The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Announcements
Has the ADL Gone Into Hiding?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Jonathan Greenblatt, National Director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League since 2015. Credit: Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0
Jonathan Greenblatt, National Director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League since 2015. Credit: Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I’ve recently taken a bit of a break after three long months of writing in my American Pravda series, during which I finally got around to publishing many of the very surprising discoveries I had made over the last fifteen-odd years. That total came to more than 90,000 words of text, and required me to read or (mostly) reread some 40-50 books, so I was quite exhausted by the end of the cycle.

However, the results were quite encouraging, with my small series of articles generating nearly half a million pageviews of readership over that short period, while helping to drive our small webzine to record-setting traffic. Even more remarkably, those articles provoked nearly 13,000 comments, totaling an astonishing 1.8 million words of text. Indeed, the three most heavily-commented articles in our webzine’s history came from that group, as did five of our seven most widely-read pieces from the last six months.

Furthermore, several of these articles appear to have very strong “legs” and are still attracting enough readership to remain on the front page many weeks after they were first released, suggesting that they may end up accumulating remarkable aggregate traffic across the coming months and years.

Although all items in my American Pravda series have certainly been controversial, many of this group were especially so, with numerous observers noting that I had leaped four-square onto the deadliest “Third Rail” of journalist topics and some of them predicting that I would quickly be annihilated as a consequences of my foolhardy undertaking. I think the following is a reasonable list of these especially “touchy” pieces:

After the first and most innocuous of these pieces ran, an ultra-right-wing blogger quite unfriendly to me claimed that I had gone completely insane and for some bizarre reason had decided to commit immediate journalistic suicide by writing about such utterly forbidden topics. But that statement was made in early June and those reports of my demise seem rather premature.

Another right-winger bitterly hostile to my views said he was astonished that I had dared to publish the “Jewish Religion” article, and declared that if that piece didn’t immediately kill The Review, then absolutely nothing could. Ten weeks have now gone by, and I see no apparent need for any burial shroud.

Several much friendlier readers commended me for my remarkable bravery, but warned that I should prepare myself for one of the most ferocious onslaughts of attacks and denunciations in recent Internet history. Offhand, that might seem a very plausible prediction. After all, writers with far less visibility and readership have sometimes been fried to a crisp by a blast of vituperation for daring to cautiously mention even just one percent of the controversial claims I had boldly made in my columns. Yet almost no such attacks ensued, except from a couple of rather obscure and marginal quarters.

Surely the ADL ranks as the leading enforcer of silence on these sorts of forbidden issues, with Hollywood stars and powerful politicians trembling at merely a cross word from that fearsome organization. But their own silence over the last three months has been absolutely deafening, and without their apparent willingness to participate in any such attack, what other group or individual of any significance would dare to take the lead?

A very shrewd observation, widely misattributed to Voltaire, states that “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” Or put another way, individuals are reluctant to publicly challenge those whose power they fear. Certainly, this simple standard helps to explain many important aspects of America’s severely malfunctioning political system.

But suppose that same test were applied to the reaction of the ADL and its close allies toward this small series of articles, which have already been read nearly half a million times. What does such total silence indicate about the organization’s opinion on the relative power relationship they would face? I very much doubt that the ADL fears me in the least as an individual, but I do think they may be absolutely terrified of the many facts contained within the series of recent columns that I have now published, and such abject terror is what keeps them far, far away.

The easiest means of testing this hypothesis would for readers to bring these columns to the direct attention of the ADL and any journalists or activists who may be aligned with it. Perhaps the entire leadership of the ADL has merely been on an extended summer vacation, and remains unaware of the existence of this body of highly controversial material, which they normally would attack in such harsh terms. Surely, they would be grateful at an opportunity to begin earning their munificent salaries.

I don’t use Twitter myself, but I believe it’s very good means for passing along such information and links, and the ADL and its top leadership have several public Twitter addresses, as do their friends and allies.

 

ORDER IT NOW

Meanwhile, I’ve recently spent some time reading a couple of the essay collections of Israel Shamir published in the mid-2000s. These had been sitting on my shelf for three or four years, and found the material extremely interesting.

I was very pleased to discover that he had come to so many conclusions quite similar to my own, though his analysis was usually derived from a vastly greater base of historical and personal knowledge rather than my own casual readings here and there. A portion of his articles from such years as 2005 and 2006 are conveniently available here, and provide a flavor of his views.

ORDER IT NOW

I first encountered his writings on Counterpunch a few years ago, and I remember the late Alex Cockburn once telling me that no other writer they published received such tremendous support from some of their readers but also such enormous hostility from others. Apparently, the latter group eventually triumphed, and his last column ran there just over three years ago, apparently making him one of the first of their regular contributors to fall in the ongoing purge.

Anyway, I’d strongly recommend his books, which so far at least have not yet been banned from Amazon.com.

 

Update – Here’s a nice example of a Tweet someone sent out

 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: Anti-Semitism, Israel, Jews, World War II 
Hide 483 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Tyrion 2 says:

    “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

    You criticise Jews for months by obscenely blaming them for all modern evil and nothing happens…what’s the conclusion?

    Oh, right, it is that these all-powerful demon -ike creatures are scared of your globe spanning unique intellectual valour!

    This doesn’t sound like psychosis at all…no sirreee.

  2. I don’t have many followers but I have done my bit and Tweeted the link to this article.
    This is an excellent site and you have many interesting columnists and commenters. Well done, and good luck.

  3. Wade says:

    Thanks Ron for writing this. I’ll admit that ever since the David Irving article, not only have I read each of your successive articles with much anticipation, I also kept doing Google searches for “Ron Unz” to see what the backlash, which to my mind was inevitable, would be.

    It never came! I’ve wondered and wondered why not.

    The only thing I can think of is that since you are already a generally well regarded, professionally accomplished individual, with political views many of which are fairly moderate, of Jewish ancestry, with the pieces in question well researched and articulated, the usual denunciations like “antisemite!” simply do not apply and would not stick if they were used anyway. They literally have no M.O. for dealing with a guy like you. The only thing a media campaign against you would serve to do is direct more traffic to your website and force a confrontation on these highly embarrassing issues.

    The only thing they can do now I guess is stay quiet.

  4. Sean says:
    @Tyrion 2

    More Quixotic than obscene. Just for the sake of argument, let us assume you agreed with Ron Unz about all this stuff. Would you have what it takes to publicly say so? I remember reading that the ADL was silent about Henry Ford’s the International Jew because the lomg time leader of the organisation said begining a controversy over the book would be starting ” a fire” that might prove uncontrollable. But then the old conservative leader died and the ADL went after Ford,who was forced to recant under threat of a business boycott by car dealerships. I suspect Unz will not be left wondering where the ADL are for all that long.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  5. Arioch says:

    Re: The JFK Assassination, Part II

    I recently was told about one quite damned coincidence (controversial, as usual, maybe a one that did not happen at all, definitely did not happen officially)

    And seeing recent downing of Russian military aircraft at the height of Israel attack on Syria, with some other false flags we learned about, the very possibility of it looks quite grim.

    Could it be that US Nuclear forces got foreign command to attack USSR and JFK tried to investigate who was dispatching such commands, for which he the president of USA would be held responsible after the fact? And then his real crime would be not “attack at FRS” nor “attack at CIA” (the latter would just mutate into other agencies like NED, simulating her defeat and death, but actually merely forgoing rebranding), but preventing the nuclear WW3, once and forever (or at least for years to come).

    https://the-arioch.livejournal.com/86899.html

  6. Wade says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Nice try. But to me this falls flat. First of all I don’t think Ron has literally blamed Jews for all the world’s evils any more than Southern Christians like me have been blamed for all the world’s evils by Hollywood.

    The issue is that Jewish leadership plays really dirty. And they are good at it. But having them in control of the West’s media means that their negative impact on society goes unremarked upon while the positive things they do are trumpeted from the rooftops. We are allowed to notice Jewish power in relation to their main accomplishments, but we are referred to the nearest holocaust museum when we notice any negative impact that Jewish power has. It’s one of the many wars on “noticing” the media is engaged in.

    I don’t see how all of this ends in mass pogroms, let alone a holocaust if you want my opinion. We’re just hoping for a much overdue correction in perspective. Topics like Israel’s founding and influence in US politics, The Holocaust, WWII and 911 are being desacralized so they can be discussed rationally, and that’s good for everyone. Those who doubt Oswald was the lone assassin have been treated for decades with a smorgasbord of conspiracy theories about JFK ranging from Cuba and Castro, to anti-Castro Cubans, LBJ, The Mafia, the KBG, the CIA all being cast as possible suspects, but not even once has Israel being fingered by anyone anywhere (except by the indefatigable Michael Collins Piper) as a possible suspect, even though they had as clear (or clearer) motives and opportunity than nearly anyone else. Why hasn’t this possibility been more fully explored by JFK researchers? Everyone needs to know how much Israel has benefited from 911. Their role in this also needs to be explored much more by researchers and brought out into the open.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    , @F0337
    , @Anon
    , @Karl
    , @pensword
  7. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Wade

    You sound like a feminist who says feminism is just about equal rights for women. Tell me, is there any situation involving Jews where you don’t see them as the protagonists of evil and anyone else involved as their victims?

    Among the anti-Semites on this site the only disagreement on whether the Jews dunnit or not is when the two anti-Semites disagree on whether the particular action was bad or not. In others words, when you lot say the Jews did it you are using that attribution as a synonym for you disagreeing with the action. It’s obviously crazy.

    Perhaps you see a practical purpose to all of this and you are not actually mad? Maybe you feel you can take SJW theology, focus it on Jews and use them as a scapegoat? Maybe you can. Maybe this will defeat SJWism? But I think probably not, as it all seems a bit silly to blame everything on such a small number of people. I don’t know…

  8. The Unz Review is a tremendous site. It attracts superior writers as well as commentators. And Ron Unz, fortunately, is untouchable. The ADL understands this. Better for them to remain silent. They want to keep you as obscure as possible. Thus, the silent treatment.

    Thus, the MSM would rather talk about crude ‘white power’ sites than the perspicacious Unz Review. But you can bet, Ron, that they will pounce on you if given the opportunity.

    Says Ron: “I do think [the ADL] may be absolutely terrified of the many facts contained within the series of recent columns that I have now published, and such abject terror is what keeps them far, far away.” That covers it. In the meantime, I look forward to seeing the UNZ review grow in influence and readership.

    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @animalogic
    , @c matt
  9. anonymous[144] • Disclaimer says:

    Hey Ron, I did my little bit: I called in to C Span and mentioned the Unz website on air.

    Interesting thing: along with the archived video, C Span publishes a transcript derived from the closed-captioning system. A reader can conduct a word-search of C Span programming, presumably, based on those transcripts.

    Now, the transcripts are frequently inaccurate , the most frequent error being that of omission. (Some of us are so conspiracy-minded that we check the ‘script against the video and notice more than a few omissions that have to be deliberate). However, in the case of the “Unz” reference, the transcript took the unprecedented trouble to insert an ellipsis in the place of “Unz,” which, if I recall correctly, I spelled out and repeated.

    I think C Span needs more calls to let them know that American Enterprise Institute, WINEP, Hudson, etc. are not the only non-crustacean fish in the sea; C Span needs to add the rare, beautiful and oh-so-colorful Unz-fish to its menu: superb with Bay Seasoning and butter.

    (Dang! Auto-correct turns UNZ into UNO!)

  10. @Tyrion 2

    Tyrion 2—it all seems a bit silly to blame everything on such a small number of people

    On page 389 of Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil, Gerard Menuhin explains it like this:

    ‘Jews make up an infinitesimal part of the world’s population. If this is not a case of the tail wagging the dog, what is? But that is not the point. The point is that Jews benefit from an inter-connected support group which behaves like electrical circuitry reacting to a central conductor. It is sometimes claimed that Jews can’t help getting ahead so quickly and gaining the top jobs, they are simply more intelligent than non-Jews. But sharp practices and low cunning are not the same as superior ability. If gentiles behaved like an army in civilian clothes and spent every waking hour planning how to ballyhoo and haggle, they might have the same success rate as Jews. The trouble is that non-Jews can’t profit from a dedicated network. They are just ordinary people, who, despite their overwhelming majority and wish for peaceful coexistence, cannot defeat this paltry minority, for they cannot see the truth. They simply cannot conceive of such organized malevolence, raised to the level of a religion.’

  11. The quote “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” comes from Tacitus The Life of Agricola
    other nice quotes are-

    “It is the rare fortune of these days that one may think what one likes and say what one thinks.”
    ― Tacitus, Histories of Tacitus
    “It is a principle of nature to hate those whom you have injured.”
    ― Tacitus
    “Crime, once exposed, has no refuge but in audacity.” Annals

    and finally
    “They have plundered the world, stripping naked the land in their hunger… they are driven by greed, if their enemy be rich; by ambition, if poor… They ravage, they slaughter, they seize by false pretenses, and all of this they hail as the construction of empire. And when in their wake nothing remains but a desert, they call that peace.”
    ― Tacitus, The Agricola and the Germania

  12. The SPLC seem strangely determined to ignore Unz, as well. To them, in 2014, at least, he’s merely a ‘far-right businessman and failed Republican political candidate’.

    • Replies: @gregor
  13. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    Oh, cool. All Jews are engaged in inconceivable organised evil. Yes, yes, yes, that must come from a balanced individual. Woo hoo.

    • Replies: @F0337
    , @Svigor
    , @Kratoklastes
    , @utu
  14. Wade says:
    @Tyrion 2

    I talked about “Israel’s founding and influence in US politics, The Holocaust, WWII and 911 are being desacralized so they can be discussed rationally, and that’s good for everyone. “… and then the JFK assassination.

    Me including WWII in that probably leaves me open to criticism by you so I will clarify. It was not in the interests of the US to enter WWII in my view. I know that Great Britain and her spies played a roll in getting us into it, and obviously it was something FDR wanted as well. It is obvious that Jewish media played a roll in getting the US into both wars and this I believe is due to their unique interests as well. In addition, the majority of FDR’s advisors were Jewish Communists who hated Germany. Of course, US Ambassador to Britain Joseph P Kennedy didn’t hate Germany and did his best to keep us out of the war. For that he became labelled and hated as an “antisemite.”

    As for Winston Churchill there were wealthy Jewish bankers that backed both his political career and gave him his employment opportunities even from when he got out of college, this not unlike John McCain who sold his sole to Lucifer and acted to get the US into every single war imaginable and now is praised by the Jewish press, left and right. This high praise is difficult to explain without first excepting his relationship with neocons and their mutual connivance against the public’s interest on behalf of Israel’s interests.

    In any case, there was a confluence of causes of WWII. But one of those causes was definitely *not* the interests of the US people or their opinions in the matter since the vast majority of the US citizenry were opposed to entering both world wars.

    As I mentioned in my first reply to you, I believe that Jews play a huge roll in shaping the political scene and I allowed for the fact that they play a positive roll in society as well. I just said their positive roll is held up for all to see and any negative impact is successfully hidden away from most of the public. I don’t feel like a victim. I feel that Gentiles are still largely in control of our society. That’s why I’m speaking up. I think Gentiles by and large are ignorant of the interests involved in keeping us in the Middle East. Its only a matter of getting the truth out and most people, including Evangelical Christians, will become fed up with our involvement in the Middle East on behalf of Israel. When that happens, our policies will change.

    However, isn’t it patently obvious who the organized opposition to us doing this is? Every single major media news outlet supports these continued wars and so does Israel.

    • Agree: Carroll Price
    • Replies: @Anon
  15. Perhaps the ADL considers Unz useful?

    This site distracts attention away from the American far right’s traditional emphasis on a very concrete platform (immigration restriction, non-interventionist foreign policy, balanced trade, federalism, etc.), and instead redirects energies towards dead ends such as “Holocaust Denial”, “9/11 Trutherism”, “JFK Conspiracy Theories”, “Creationism” etc.

    Instead of being the deadly serious brains and hard-core activists behind the America First platform, which achieved unprecedented electoral upsets such as defeating a house majority leader in a primary election and electing a president who lacked prior political or military experience, the ADL hopes the American far right will devolve into a bunch of kooks and cranks content to harmlessly plunge down the rabbit hole.

    Furthermore, each of the alternative narratives promoted at Unz.com actually strengthens the globalist / cultural-marxist establishment:

    1. Holocaust denial – creates unreasonable levels of skepticism about early 20th century mass murders, thus shielding from scrutiny the Jewish role in the crimes of the Ottomans and Bolsheviks. If we’re too skeptical to believe in the reality of Nazi crimes, even though the Nazis were “caught red handed”, then we are forced to completely exonerate regimes that “got away with it”.

    2. Trutherism – lets Al-Qaeda off the hook for 9/11 and other similar terror attacks, thus diminishing popular outrage at the Israel lobby’s policy of supporting Al-Qaeda in Syria and Yemen.

    3. JFK Conspiracy Theories – tend to make JFK into a hero, thus validating his political positions (open borders, liberal activist foreign policy, unilateral free trade, social engineering via judicial decree, etc.)

    4. Creationism – perpetuates the unnatural feud between evangelical Christianity and Darwinian hard science. As Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique makes clear, Darwinian hard science is an invaluable ally against pseudo-scientific, anti-Christian intellectual movements such as Boasian anthropology, Marxist economics, Freudian psychology and Frankfurt School sociology.

  16. FKA Max says:

    “Selected Tweeters” page not displaying any tweets: http://www.unz.com/tweeters/
    [...]
    There are some more glitches in the system I am aware of, but they are only minor. I will report/share them when you post another “Announcement”.

    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-post-war-france-and-post-war-germany/#comment-2415283

    The “Switch Ascending/Descending Order” button on commenters’ comments archives, e.g. http://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Ron+Unz , is not working and instead directs one to the Unz Review front/home page via this link: http://www.unz.com/?CommentOrder=ASC

    http://www.unz.com/announcement/the-remarkable-historiography-of-david-irving/#comment-2372958

    Thank you very much.

  17. FKA Max says:
    @John Gruskos

    Instead of being the deadly serious brains and hard-core activists behind the America First platform, which achieved unprecedented electoral upsets such as defeating a house majority leader in a primary election and electing a president who lacked prior political or military experience, the ADL hopes the American far right will devolve into a bunch of kooks and cranks content to harmlessly plunge down the rabbit hole.

    If I were you I’d be more worried about the MAGA crowd and movement being distracted and their attention being diverted by the QAnon psyop/meme than by the Unz Review:

    [MORE]


    People like to call Qanon “Pizzagate on steroids,” but it’s really both emotionally and socioeconomically Pizzagate on bath salts.
    https://www.mediaite.com/online/msnbcs-hallie-jackson-covers-insane-qanon-conspiracy-theories-pizzagate-on-bath-salts/

    Although the amount of anti-Semitism in QAnon-related content is currently very low, it has the potential to proliferate especially quickly given the viral nature of the subculture.https://www.adl.org/resources/reports/quantifying-hate-a-year-of-anti-semitism-on-twitter#qanon

    QAnon Conspiracists Believe Trump and Mueller are Working Together (HBO)

    The Trump Fans Of Q-Anon (HBO)

    I also suggest you read or re-read this article by Mr. Unz to understand his strategy:

    A crucial aspect enabling such a rebel alliance is the typically narrow focus of each particular constituent member. Most groups or individuals opposing establishment positions tend to be ideologically zealous about one particular issue or perhaps a small handful, while being much less interested in others. Given the total suppression of their views at the hands of the mainstream media, any venue in which their unorthodox perspectives are provided reasonably fair and equal treatment rather than ridiculed and denigrated tends to inspire considerable enthusiasm and loyalty on their part. So although they may have quite conventional views on most other matters, causing them to regard contrary views with the same skepticism or unease as might anyone else, they will usually be willing to suppress their criticism at such wider heterodoxy so long as other members of their alliance are willing to return that favor on their own topics of primary interest.

    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-breaching-the-media-barrier/#p_1_15

    However, suppose that an entirely different strategy were adopted. Instead of attempting to make a case “beyond any reasonable doubt,” proponents merely provide sufficient evidence and analysis to suggest that there is a 30% chance or a 50% chance or a 70% chance that the unorthodox theory is true. The very fact that no claim of near certainty is being advanced provides a powerful defense against any plausible accusations of fanaticism or delusional thinking. But if the issue is of enormous importance and—as is usually the case—the unorthodox theory has been almost totally ignored by the media, despite apparently having at least a reasonable chance of being true, then the media may be effectively attacked and ridiculed for its laziness and incompetence. These charges are very difficult to refute and since no claim is being made that the unorthodox theory has necessarily been proven correct, merely that it might possibly be correct, any counter-accusations of conspiratorial tendencies would fall flat.

    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-breaching-the-media-barrier/#p_1_26:1-162

  18. Rich says:

    Well thought out, common sense arguments written in easily understood language, if the ADL, or any totalitarian organization were to argue with Mr Unz, they know they would lose. They’d rather fight the three guys left still wearing KKK robes, and the handful of neo-Nazis who will never influence the majority of people. Ron Unz is a gift to all freedom loving individuals who believe in the pursuit of truth. Keep it up, Ron, you’re doing a great service.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  19. It is not easy to access the most controversial pages (Jewish religion, holocaust denial, 9/11) from the UK. Google Chrome times out immediately, Opera with VPN gets to the first two slowly, even over a proxy server sited in the USA. I have still not got to the last one. Is there an inner secret which we who rely on the MSI or mainstream internet do not know?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Ron Unz
  20. Ron Unz says:
    @Philip Neal

    Unfortunately, it’s quite possible that the sheer size of the pages is the problem, given that each of them has 1,600 to 2,200 comments, many of them quite long. All of the HTML pages are 8-15 MB in size, which is very large. Since you’re using an overseas connection, maybe there’s some issue with CloudFlare we can address at our end.

    And my deepest thanks to many of the other commenters for their very kind words.

  21. FKA Max says:
    @John Gruskos

    One of my comments appears to have vanished, here the information on QAnon I shared:

    WikiLeaks Calls QAnon A Likely ‘Pied Piper’ Operation

    https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/wikileaks-calls-qanon-a-likely-pied-piper-operation-e5c4f4fac4a

    Archived link: http://archive.is/3yTZl

    The thread is worth reading in its entirety, easier done here in this thread reader due to its size. Dawson explains how QAnon uses standard psyop tactics, first establishing credibility and then implementing gamification and spirituality to suck followers into an energized, cultish mentality which leaves them susceptible to suggestion, manipulation and direction.

    Thread here: https://archive.is/gS1PJ

  22. gregor says:
    @Henry's Cat

    The SPLC’s “extremist” list looks like a stratified selection of their political enemies, but it’s fairly exclusive. They’ve got white nationalist types like Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer, plus more academic types like Charles Murray, Arthur Jensen, Philippe Rushton, Kevin MacDonald, and Harry Harpending (but not Greg Cochran). Ron’s recent articles are way beyond anything Charles Murray has ever written. But lowly bloggers and independent online writers fall outside “prestige” publishing, so I think they feel less need to bother defaming them individually. IRL activism and organization seems to be another dimension.

    The left’s strategy will be to 1) continue to control the “prestige” outlets: academia, newspapers, major publishers, 2) censor the huge online platforms like Twitter and YouTube, 3) confine the samizdat to small-scale blogs and independent websites, 4) crush any sort of offline right-wing activism through violence (to keep the right wing confined to online ghettos). It’s not going to work, though.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  23. Another similar character that gets left alone, as far as I can tell, is Brother Nathaniel.

    I find it odd that nutty Alex Jones, who ironically, never spoke ill of Jews has been kicked off the internet and yet the much smarter, more dangerous and heretical Ron and Brother Nathaniel are still here.

    My best guess is that the ADL and others know that the more cerebral alt right sites like Unz and Counter Currents will always have very limited appeal to the masses. And so it’s best to just ignore them so as not to draw attention to the very convincing ideas people might find within.

    • Agree: Mike P
  24. MikeB says:

    @Philip Neal

    I have had similar problems and I suspect Ron is correct and they are due to the enormous size of the pages. I have had no problems when using a Linux browser on a pc, but my antique IPhone shunts me out of Safari if I try to access the longer articles.

  25. anon[317] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    The Unz Review website is a 2nd C span..its a peace prize in the making.
    Time will find most thinking people at the Unz Review.

    @ Johnny Rottenborough @ Tyrion 2

    In response to “blame everything on such a small number” I recall that just two Atom bombs ended years of WWII, returned 6 million soldiers to their homes, and established a highly successful Jewish Holocaust propaganda that serves to this day as cover for the largest theft in the world, (Arab Oil became Zionist Oil)

    In response to ordinary people not understanding ‘organized malevolence, raised to a level of religion.. I say, the genus among us have failed to articulate the problem, its meaning and its impact on the many.. needed are lie revealing tools, flexible enough for the masses to use to discover and counter deceitful propaganda

    How should ordinary peaceful coexistence people[the masses] discover ..
    What should ordinary peaceful coexistence people [the masses] discover..
    do we blame Tryone 2 or the peaceful coexistence majority for failing to understand or care?

    • Replies: @annamaria
  26. F0337 says:
    @Wade

    Indeed, TPTB know full well that some things (Ron Unz among them) are better left ignored.

    numerous observers noting that I had leaped four-square onto the deadliest “Third Rail” of journalist topics and some of them predicting that I would quickly be annihilated as a consequences of my foolhardy undertaking.

    I didn’t see anyone predicting any kind of annihilation, though I could easily have missed it. What I did see–and what I agree with–is that a lot of that ‘third rail’ material fell into the category of ‘own goal’ and ‘shooting oneself in the foot’ and other such activities the purpose of which really eludes me.

    Mind you, I’m still sorry to have seen it, because this site is an important locus of free speech online and having its credibility so thoroughly besmirched by its own founder represents a wound far graver than the ADL is likely to administer. Daresay they could hardly be happier just now.

    • Replies: @Wade
    , @sarz
  27. F0337 says:
    @Tyrion 2

    You’d probably be a tad more persuasive without the hysterical exaggeration.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  28. JackOH says:

    FWIW-We’re living in an America, in my opinion, where the radical is and has been in the ascendant, and censorship is and has been internalized. Many of the comments here admit to that explicitly or implicitly.

    Last week heard a Jewish speaker whose views I like. I was thinking of saying to the woman I was with something like: “Yeah, he probably got shoved out of that one job because they didn’t like pushy Jews.” I’d intended that without rancor, a neutral observation that stereotypes about ethnic and racial behaviors and the responses to those stereotypes are grounded in some reality. It was meant as a conversational bit, that’s all.

    I refrained. Because I felt sure she’d toss me into the “toxic anti-Semite” trash bin.

    Those of us who regard ourselves as moderate, or maybe “traditionalist”, in our views don’t have a lot of places to work out our thinking without being regarded as “haters”. Ron deserves some major props.

    • Replies: @Anon
  29. Svigor says:

    Ron drops three nukes* on three Jewish cities, “astonished” at fallout.

    Lol, you crack me up, dude. I’m guessing you don’t get invited to many Jewish parties.

    *At least four, really, if you count the Meritocracy thing, which I do.

  30. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    You criticise Jews for months by obscenely blaming them for all modern evil

    This is a weird form of projection that I’m going to name “inverse projection”:

    1. Jews are the original dindus: they literally believe Jews never did nuffin.
    2. Jews literally believe all evil is down to goys.
    3. These two Jewish delusions combine in strange fashion in their ethnocentric heads, and out pops “goys blame Jews for everything!”

    Jews’ heads are truly a mess. It’s astounding that they are so prominent in psychotherapy; it’s like knowingly putting pedos in charge of child care.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    , @Frankie P
  31. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    You sound like a feminist who says feminism is just about equal rights for women. Tell me, is there any situation involving Jews where you don’t see them as the protagonists of evil and anyone else involved as their victims?

    What an odd question. So easily answered: yes, of course, there are myriad such situations – every situation involving Jews that we don’t bitch about.

    It’s funny that you accuse your adversaries of sounding like leftists, when it’s you who sounds like a leftist. To put your question in context, imagine an American asking a question like that about Germans in 1942. We were at war with Germany at the time: of course our focus on the Germans was dominated by that conflict. Asking “gosh, why are you so negative about Germans” really shows how badly you’ve lost the plot. Obviously nobody cared much about German charity work or the lovely recipes coming out of their kitchens at the time.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Tyrion 2
  32. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    “I can’t deal with the crit I want to deal with, so I’ll create a straw man and wrestle with that instead.”

    I suppose this works on the room-temp-IQ crowd.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  33. Svigor says:
    @John Gruskos

    While I agree, in general, with your point about conspiracy theory being a maze of blind alleys and dead ends that distract from the real issues, I don’t think holocaust revisionism is a conspiracy theory in this sense.*

    In fact, I think that holocaust revisionism is exactly the sort of high-risk, high-reward strategy that Jews would engage in, if they found themselves on the other side of the issue. It’s probably not something that they’d put all their eggs into, but I think a minority would engage in it, while leaving room for the majority to quietly refrain.

    *Or, perhaps, any sense at all; it’s worth pointing out that the shoah is a conspiracy theory, and holocaust revisionism is an attempt to debunk that conspiracy theory.

    • Replies: @AKAHorace
  34. Svigor says:
    @John Gruskos

    1. Holocaust denial – creates unreasonable levels of skepticism about early 20th century mass murders, thus shielding from scrutiny the Jewish role in the crimes of the Ottomans and Bolsheviks. If we’re too skeptical to believe in the reality of Nazi crimes, even though the Nazis were “caught red handed”, then we are forced to completely exonerate regimes that “got away with it”.

    I don’t think I buy this. For one thing, the Jewish Bolshevik thing is barely on the radar. So we aren’t sacrificing much, if we do wind up sacrificing it. For another, the two aren’t actually joined at the hip; one can advocate increased awareness of Jewish Bolshevik mass murder while simultaneously advocating shoah revisionism – just look at how Jews approach the subjects, and invert the tactics.

    When someone makes the argument, “why should we believe your narrative on the Jewish Bolsheviks when you refuse to believe the Jewish narrative on the shoah,” there are a couple of rejoinders:

    1. Don’t believe me. Do your own research and your own thinking.
    2. There is no massive regime in place to enforce my narrative. The opposite situation obtains with regard to the shoah; that massive regime demands that I question the shoah (as does any regime of reward and punishment in pursuit of an orthodoxy). The shoah is indeed unique in its need to be questioned, because it is unique in its being propped up by massive gov’t power.
    3. They really are two different issues, you know, and should be judged separately. The facts of one do not depend on the facts of the other.
    4. When you question the Jewish Bolshevik crimes against humanity, you are strengthening my arguments against the alleged Nazi crimes against humanity. Thank you. (Jews have a lot more to lose here than we do)

    This is all win-win territory, AFAICT.

  35. Svigor says:
    @gregor

    The risk is that condemning such targets amounts not to deconstruction, but to free advertising.

    • Replies: @2stateshmustate
  36. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    What a painfully self-serving post! Also, onr that contradicts its own thesis, if you’d bothered to think about.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Johnny Smoggins
  37. Svigor says:
    @Svigor

    I mean seriously, how clueless can you be there, guy?

    How much writing have the Jews done about the good work of the Hitler Youth?

  38. Tyrion 2 says:
    @F0337

    Nope, I didn’t exaggerate his words at all. He wrote words with the same meaning that I gave him

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  39. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    What am I projecting? Who have I blamed for all modern evil? You dredge up one example of me doing so and I’ll dredge up ten examples of the commenters going to absurd lengths to satisfy their psychosis. Sound fair?

    • Replies: @Svigor
  40. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    What a painfully self-serving post!

    Oy, the irony.

  41. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Again, try to follow along:

    1. Jews are the original dindus: they literally believe Jews never did nuffin.
    2. Jews literally believe all evil is down to goys. (Update for the slow crowd: this is the corollary of “Jews dindu nuffin”)
    3. These two Jewish delusions combine in strange fashion in their ethnocentric heads, and out pops “goys blame Jews for everything!”

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  42. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    Again, try to follow along:

    1. Jews are the original dindus: they literally believe Jews never did nuffin

    I can name loads of Jews who have done bad things. I can also name loads of Jews who have done good things. Unsuprising, being people and all.

    In fact, if you look through my comments here you’ll see I frequently do. I think labelling Rothkopf a cynical charlatan, Krugman a bad faith bugman and Ezra Klein even worse are all fine examples.

    I am quite happy for Jews to be “called out” even as Jews. But you’re arguing in the worst faith if you don’t concede that the theories floated here are manichean in their framing.

    2. Jews literally believe all evil is down to goys. (Update for the slow crowd: this is the corollary of “Jews dindu nuffin”)

    Most evil is down to people who aren’t Jewish only because most people aren’t Jewish. Regardless, I will happily list off a lot of Jews who did evil.

    Furthermore, Jews aren’t afraid of pointing out when Jews did wrong. Our most important text is basically only that subject!

    3. These two Jewish delusions combine in strange fashion in their ethnocentric heads, and out pops “goys blame Jews for everything!”

    I don’t think it would have been possible for me to disprove your silly assertions most completely than I have above…even if your assertion were that the world is flat.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Svigor
    , @Herald
    , @Anon
  43. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    You think that you’re at war with Jews the same way the Allies were at war with the Axis powers in 1942?

  44. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    I think the Jews are waging war on Europeans.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  45. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Yeah but the Jews did nothing wrong, amirite?

  46. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Furthermore, Jews aren’t afraid of pointing out when Jews did wrong. Our most important text is basically only that subject!

    Got anything more recent than 1500 years ago? LoL.

  47. @Svigor

    “(((Our)))”

    Consider my shock imagined.

    Also, how arrogant do you have to be to use a fictional character who’s smarter than everyone around him as your username?

    • Replies: @Svigor
  48. Anonymous[410] • Disclaimer says:

    I see.

    The ADL calling out and drawing attention to these Unz articles would be clear evidence of their malice, and thus general evidence of organized Jewish deceit and evil.

    The ADL not calling out and drawing attention to these Unz articles is also clear evidence of their malice, and thus general evidence of organized Jewish deceit and evil.

    According to some commenters here even Unz.com itself is an elaborate ploy to discredit and/or fracture antisemitism in general, which would be thus general evidence of organized Jewish deceit and evil

    organized Jewish deceit and evil = unfalsifiable

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Svigor
  49. @Tyrion 2

    No, the Juws think that they’re at war with us the same way the Allies were at war with the Axis powers in 1942.

    Fear of Refugees: A Flashback to the Holocaust [adl.org]

    Closing the Borders to Refugees: Wrong in the 1930s, and Wrong Today [adl.org]

    Voters For Trump Ad – SNL

    Michael Moore Warns Trump Could Use Hitler-like Terror Attack to Grab Power

    What My Escape From Hitler’s Germany Taught Me About Trump’s America [thenation.com]

    Trump and Hitler: A Responsible Consideration by Horace Bloom [amazon.com]

    Historian on comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler … Historian Richard Frankel, an expert on Nazi Germany, says history doesn’t have to repeat itself — if we stop it [salon.com]

    If it talks like a Hitler and walks like a Hitler … [miamiherald.com]

    Donald Trump Is The Next Hitler, And Only We Can Stop Him / Donald Trump using Adolf Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ playbook / Dem candidate ‘struck by the parallels’ between Trump’s rise and Hitler’s / Barack Obama accused of comparing Donald Trump with Hitler / How Hitler’s Rise to Power Explains Why Republicans Accept Donald …/ Paper apologizes for photo of Trump with mustache resembling Hitler’s

    • Replies: @animalogic
  50. Anon[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    I noticed that about Brother Nathaniel as well. Odd that he hasn’t been purged. Am really mad at Colin Flaherty being deplatformed, I cannot access Minds.com and can find no other venue for his videos ( hint hint Ron).

  51. Svigor says:
    @Anonymous

    No, the ADL is malicious, quite apart from how they approach the Unz Question. We don’t need their approach on the matter to know they’re malefactors.

    Their approach to the Unz Question does suggest that they’ve deemed Unz’ profile below a certain threshold to justify a response.

    Or maybe they’re just moving all their pieces into place first.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  52. Svigor says:
    @Anonymous

    According to some commenters here even Unz.com itself is an elaborate ploy to discredit and/or fracture antisemitism in general, which would be thus general evidence of organized Jewish deceit and evil

    organized Jewish deceit and evil = unfalsifiable

    How are these fringe loonies commentworthy? Shall I go into some of the fringe loony Jews in the world? We can start with Messianic cults: every year, a new Jeebus.

    When I started my deep dive on the JQ (in 2002 or maybe 2003), I resolved not to pay much attention to the loonies. That’s because I was interested in getting at the truth.

    If I was interested in obscuring the truth, the loonies would be my only focus.

    Which seems to be most Jews’ focus.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  53. Svigor says:
    @Svigor

    It could also be down to Unz not being loony enough, but IIRC, Jews don’t let that stop them when it comes to more than a few goys – hey, maybe it’s the optics of Ron being Jewish.

  54. Ron Unz says:
    @Philip Neal

    It is not easy to access the most controversial pages (Jewish religion, holocaust denial, 9/11) from the UK. Google Chrome times out immediately, Opera with VPN gets to the first two slowly, even over a proxy server sited in the USA.

    I made some changes in the code that I’ve been meaning to do for a long time, and the HTML size of pages with enormous numbers of lengthy comments has now been reduced by roughly 40%.

    They’re still very large, but if size had been your problem, perhaps that reduction has fixed it. Why don’t you give it another try and let me know.

  55. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion haz teh gay

    IIRC, he’s a mischling. Halfsies, I mean.

    And he’s a right winger!

    Chew on that for a bit. With friends like these…

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  56. Svigor says:
    @Svigor

    It’s sorta like when we were at war with Germany. We knew that whatever the Germans were doing, they were up to no good, from our perspective. It might take a bit of sussing out to get at the particulars, but we could rest assured they were working against our interests.

    It’s gotten to that point with the Jews, AFAICT. If you assume they’re fucking Whites over, you’re not likely to be proven wrong.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Svigor
  57. @Tyrion 2

    On the contrary my Hebrew friend. I’m humbled to be in the company of so many great minds.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  58. So, something’s going on, I just don’t know what it is. there must be a reason, maybe several for the ADL delay. By now I was expecting, at the least, your site would be targeted with dealys, and all sorts of interference. Good it be because you do the research and quote your sources well., and they would look foolish trying to prove it? #2. or, and most nefarious. The ADL handed your file over to the JDL, which is worrisome.
    You have a great site with tier 1 bloggers. I wish you the best.

  59. AKAHorace says:
    @Svigor

    It all happened a long time ago. Endless debates about the Holocaust, who is or is not a Nazi/Stalinist? Were the Russians the real victors or the second war?, what about the Ukrainians were they Nazis? How much did the Poles help ? Were all the communists Jews ? What about the Balts ? Who was responsible for the 1939 pact ? Was Chamberlain right at Munich to play for time ? Could the Maginot line have worked if properly manned ? Was the Spitfire really a better plane than the Hurricane ? Were the Nazis pro-Muslim as their support of the Mufti of Jerusalem shows ? Were the Muslims pro-Nazi as the Bosnian SS shows ? Death of Patton, accident or something more ? Was the Atomic bomb dropped to stop the Japs or the Russians ? Alan Turing, white priviledged cryptographer ?

    Are very interesting. They are not a useful guides to the times that we live in now. Obsessing about the past is not a good way to understand the present. We live in a different world. The only history that everyone knows is the second world war, so this is how commentators have to present things. We need a more intelligent debate.

    • Agree: byrresheim
    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Skeptikal
    , @m___
  60. @Tyrion 2

    I’m no fan of visiting the sins of the father onto the son, nor the reverse. I tend to eschew ideas like “His Dad was not ‘alf bad – maybe the kid’s on to something“.

    That aside, you know who Gerard Menuhin is, right? He’s Yehudi Menuhin’s son – you know, the fiddle guy.

    He’s also the grandson of Moshe Menuhin (a virulent anti-Zionist) and 5×great-grandson of the Alter Rebbe (the first Rebbe of Chabad, and also a virulent anti-Zionist). Maybe some things run in the family.

    Yehudi Menuhin’s other son is a talented piano-guy, too.

    Still – nice to see you keeping it classy: “He thinks that Jews organise qua Jews, like Freemasonry with sillier hats and more mental-patient rocking and mumbling? Fuck him, then – I’d better “yarmulke up” imply that he’s mentally ill”.

    • Replies: @Wally
  61. Weaver1 says:

    The following book was previously available at Amazon:

    The Crucifixion of Russia: A History of the Russians and the Jews A new English translation of Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together
    Falco, Columbus

    But it is currently unavailable. I own it, English version. The Russian is still available.

    -

    The New Jerusalem (including last chapter on Zionism) by GK Chesterton is still for sale.

    It’s just interesting to see what gets censored.

  62. @Tyrion 2

    ‘You think that you’re at war with Jews the same way the Allies were at war with the Axis powers in 1942?’

    Sometimes I begin to think we are. Look at who’s lined up where. Look at who’s flailing –however ineptly — to try to save America and who seems to be determinedly sabotaging the effort.

    As I say, I’m merely beginning to think this way. It’s not a settled conviction, but…

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  63. @Svigor

    ‘…It’s gotten to that point with the Jews, AFAICT. If you assume they’re fucking Whites over, you’re not likely to be proven wrong.

    It’s hard to think of many counterexamples.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  64. @Johnny Smoggins

    ‘I find it odd that nutty Alex Jones, who ironically, never spoke ill of Jews has been kicked off the internet and yet the much smarter, more dangerous and heretical Ron and Brother Nathaniel are still here.’

    It may be that the ‘nutty’ is the clue. They waited until Alex Jones gave them the sound bite they needed, then they banned him. Ron will slip up eventually, and then they’ll take care of him as well.

  65. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    You are confusing me with someone else. Possibly a character in your head.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  66. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    Even at circus school there’s still a class clown.

  67. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    I think the Jews are waging war on Europeans.

    Your actions belie your words.

  68. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    Yes, it is called Haaretz. It comes out every day and is helpfully published in English.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  69. Svigor says:
    @Colin Wright

    Anti-semitism has predictive power.

  70. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    That’s not a denial.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  71. Svigor says:
    @Svigor

    Trump has been really great for smoking out these cockroaches. Many a mask has slipped. Jews have done a wonderful job of becoming waaaaaaay more obvious in their allegiances and totalitarianism in the last 2 years.

  72. Svigor says:
    @AKAHorace

    It’s not all in the past, though. Jews keep dredging it up, year in, year out. Jews are obsessed with it. And they are the regime.

    It’s sorta like how you may not be interested in race, White man, but race is interested in you.

  73. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    So, help a brother out. What historical guilt do Jews have to answer for? Cuz I can name a Hell of a lot of historical guilt that Jews say Whites have to answer for.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  74. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    I’ve given you two almost endless lists of bad things done by Jews that span thousands of years and will continue into the future.

    But now you change the question while pretending it is the same. I don’t believe that people have to answer for “historical guilt”. I believe in individual justice (normally known simply as justice) but not your favoured “social justice”.

    I get it. You’re driven crazy by the social justice dystopia we live in and you’ve spun your own narrative where you are a super special victim while some other group (in this case Jews, not whites generally) is guilty of everything that afflicts you – even things you’ve seemingly done – as Jews have power or some nonsense.

    If awfulness occurs but Jews cannot be tenuously linked to its cause, did it really happen? Or was it really bad?

    Are you really this crazy?

    Your’s is a cartoon mirror version of SJWism. Which is tragic, because SJWism is already grotesque.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  75. Svigor says:

    Tyrion and the other “right wing Jews” need to stop taking “right wing Jew” to mean “Jew with license to preach at right-wing whites in jingoistic defense of the Jews” and start taking it to mean “Jew with the enormous task of righting the Jewish ship.”

    Stop shirking and go do your duty, “right wing” Jews. Go clean up your own back yard. Go straighten out your own people. We are beyond fucking tired of hearing you people yap.

    • Agree: Johnny Smoggins
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    , @Anon
    , @Stan d Mute
  76. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    No, it isn’t. This is a denial: “I am a full Jew, not a half Jew.” This is a denial: “I am not Jewish.” Etc.

    I really have to explain contractual specificity to you?

  77. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Ok, since you (laughably) clearly meant it in earnest:

    Insofar as the OT is the story of Jews behaving badly, it’s the story of Jews not being ethnocentric enough, and not living up to their end of the “God’s Chosen People” contract.

    It’s humblebrag and Jewish racism.

    Sailer’s written about this spurious “Jewish Guilt”:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/white-american-guilt-catholic-guilt/

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  78. Svigor says:

    But now you change the question while pretending it is the same. I don’t believe that people have to answer for “historical guilt”. I believe in individual justice (normally known simply as justice) but not your favoured “social justice”.

    You’re just another (yawn) unpricipled Jew. You are ethnocentrically defending your tribe, not upholding some universalistic principle of “individual justice over collective guilt.” If you were really principled, YOU WOULDN’T BE HERE, you’d be OUT THERE, opposing Jews, who are far bigger violators of your phony principle than we are. Jews are everywhere, violating your supposed principles with giant megaphones, but here you are in some backwater, with us, defending your tribe.

    Fuck you, you phony fuck.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  79. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    There is no racism in the Old Testament. There is plenty of nationalism though. That you can’t tell the difference is classic SJWism.

    For example there are loads of converts who star. Or have you gone full SJW and believe in Dolezal-esque transracialism?

    Not that it is likely that you have read it. You don’t get that there are endless examples of Jews doing bad things. Like David sending off one of his soldiers to die so he can marry the widow.

    You don’t read the text. You just screech racism. Truly you have become the freak you feared.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  80. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    You need to stop acting like such a psycho. It makes rehabilitating nationalism so much harder.

    I think we can both agree that those who understand their enemy are much more successful than those who don’t. Tell me: who do the successful Western nationalists like those in charge in of Hungary, Poland and Italy identify?

    Hint: they disagree with you.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  81. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    Like it or not, I get associated with people like you all of the time. Thankfully, since there’s no hate in my heart I can wriggle out of being burnt on the fire of your making. But it is so tiresome to have to.

    Also, I’ve been reading stuff like Sailer all my life, but it is only since Ron went full Don Quixote that I’ve felt the need to comment like this.

    Sailer is 80% correct on Jews. Plus his stuff is useful. Treacherous ingratitude is still treacherous ingratitude even if it is mostly adopted with (confused) good intentions. That Jews have, disproportionately compared to other whites, shown that to their respective Western nations is not something I shy away from. Calling out individuals on it is effective – I know, I do it when decency dictates it should be done, but not if such calling out is tied to whackadoodle conspiracy theories.

    How is any of this hard to grasp?

    • Replies: @Svigor
  82. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Colin Wright

    Sometimes I begin to think we are. Look at who’s lined up where. Look at who’s flailing –however ineptly — to try to save America

    Who’s doing the flailing?

  83. Svigor says:

    There is no racism in the Old Testament.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA good one.

  84. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Thankfully, since there’s no hate in my heart

    And you have the nerve to say others sound like SJWs, lol.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  85. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Not that it is likely that you have read it. You don’t get that there are endless examples of Jews doing bad things. Like David sending off one of his soldiers to die so he can marry the widow.

    That’s not “the Jews” committing an historical crime they must answer for. Hell, this whole tangent of yours is ludicrous.

    Jew: “whites must answer for slavery and the Holocaust”
    White: “yeah, well, Jews must answer for David muh Bible bla bla bla”
    Jews: “ROTFLMAO he’s bringing up the Bible”

    You’re a piece of shit, Tyrion.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  86. Svigor says:

    Actual crimes THE JEWS must answer for:

    Exploitation of non-Jews pretty much everywhere they went in Europe, in the middle ages and early modern period in particular. See Israel Shahak and others’ work.

    The Genocidal Phase of Soviet History (amazingly cohencidental overlap with the phase of Soviet history during which Jews had the most power).

    Various acts of subversion and villainy too numerous to name here.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  87. Svigor says:

    Jews are working collectively to shut down free speech in the west, and you’re talking about the Bible. Fuck you, you weaselly little second-rate mamzer.

    ADL: plz send a competent Jew liar.

    • Disagree: Tyrion 2
  88. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Hungary basically names the Jew, lol. “Globalists” and “rootless cosmopolitans” and “anti-Soros” laws, and such. And OF COURSE, organized Jewry calls that “anti-semitism.”

    Jew Agenda: gender studies for the west (Hungary included).
    Orban Agenda: “no” to Jewish agenda for Hungary. Removed “gender studies” from Hungarian universities.

    LOL @ your buffoonery.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  89. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    That’s not “the Jews” committing an historical crime they must answer for. Hell, this whole tangent of yours is ludicrous.

    We’ve been through this. I don’t believe in people being guilty of historical crimes. I am not a social justice warrior who believes in the oxymoronic term “social justice”. It seems you are.

    Jew: “whites must answer for slavery and the Holocaust”

    Any Jew who does that is spreading poison. Just as any person who does that is spreading poison. It is as much blood libel as the “blood libel”. The people who had to answer for the Holocaust was the perpetrators, like Eichman, and it seems they did answer for it.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Svigor
  90. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    Pure SJWism. Just an even sillier target.

  91. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    They display their hatred with every sentence. Where have I shown any?

    Come on, you have plenty of comments of mine to sift through. Many even written when less than lucid – ha!

    • Replies: @Svigor
  92. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    You’re making stuff up again.

    Here’s the most popular politician in Europe:

    “We are proud that in Hungary, self-identifying Jews, who celebrate and preserve Jewish tradition can feel safe.”

    Here’s how he described his attitude to anti-Semitism: “zero tolerance”.

    Here’s him on Israel: “A Hungarian patriot and a Jewish Israeli patriot will always find something in common”.

    Or finally, as anathema to you, he pledged to cooperate in “anything related to the war against anti-Semitism” and said the phenomenon was on the rise in Western Europe and on the decline in Eastern Europe and also took the form of “utterances against the State of Israel”.

    Orban is a lot more philo-Semitic than me.

    He has also been the most successful and popular European nationalist leader in decades.

    What lesson do you choose to learn from this?

    https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-israel-hungary-orban-netanyahu/hungarys-orban-tells-israel-that-jews-in-his-country-can-feel-safe-idUKKBN1K918W

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @John Gruskos
  93. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    We’ve been through this. I don’t believe in people being guilty of historical crimes.

    So fuck off and go police your people on their routine violations of your “principles.”

  94. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    So Jews are collectively quite guilty of spreading poison. Good to know.

  95. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Thankfully, since there’s no hate in my heart

    There’s where you sounded like an SJW, you low-rent mamzer.

  96. Tyrion 2 says:

    Svigor: the ADL could not have created a better bot to (somehow) further discredit anti-Semitism and (sadly) nationalism if they tried. Well done! You approximate the bot of their dreams.

  97. Svigor says:

    Great, then your Precious tribe is happy, and you can STFU now.

  98. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Yeah, they can feel safe (they say the opposite, but Jews are inveterate liars – whaddayagonnado?). And their agenda is fucked. So, OF COURSE, organized Jewry calls him “ANTI-SEMITE!!!”

    So, what can we deduce about Jews, from this lil’ exercise? From organized Jewry?

    LOL @ u.

    • Replies: @KDM
  99. Anonymous[237] • Disclaimer says:

    I remember when the MSM journalists uncovered Milo’s (completely reasonable) statements about the age of consent; I had known about them for months earlier, having heard them in a video by Sinead(more like S***head amiright?) McCarthy. This is a similar case. The eye of Soros is destructive, but it can only focus on so many people at a time, allowing many others to slip through the cracks, at least temporarily. In part, you were aided by your Jewish ancestry, high intelligence, and the size of your posts, which few MSM writers will take the time to read through. The ADL usually goes looking for the stupid,(c.f. Andrew Anglin) but when they do find you, they will come for you.

  100. RobinG says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron,

    Thanks for your continued independence. I hope you will republish Suzie Dawson’s article, “Being Julian Assange.” https://contraspin.co.nz/beingjulianassange/

  101. MKR says:

    @Ron Unz

    I am certainly not surprised at this. The ADL prefers to put the spotlight on crude anti-semites, those people with complaints about the shape of Jewish noses and the like. They certainly would not like to bring attention to your well written articles.

  102. Wally says:
    @Kratoklastes

    Speaking of Gerard Menuhin:

    “Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish “holocaust” and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the “survivors”? Because it “dishonors the dead”? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble.”

    - Gerard Menuhin / righteous Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the laughable ‘holocaust’ story is the message.

    No immense human remains as alleged, no ‘holocaust’.

    http://www.codoh.com

  103. Wally says:
    @Wade

    Ron:
    What can they say that hasn’t already been discredited?
    Your article and the irrefutable Revisionist comments simply obliterate the fake ‘holocaust’ narrative:
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz

    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    That thread has become a mini database of Revisionist research & responses which shred their fake & impossible ‘holocaust’. I recommend it for everyone.

    The last thing the “Holocau$t Industry” wants is for more attention to be given to you, a Jew, and the comments that have been made here.
    The more they speak the worse it becomes for their fake, but heretofore profitable scam.

    We may see some extraneous blog posts which attempt to discredit you personally , but they will never be truthful about what you actually say and what Revisionists have posted in response.
    The ‘holocaust’ Big Lie simply does not stand up to rational, scientific scrutiny.
    After all, that’s why there are laws against free speech concerning it, and that’s why Revisionists are attacked, persecuted, & demonized.

    Pour it on Ron, there’s no letting up now.

    Many thanks.
    http://www.codoh.com

  104. For a short time rons Wikipedia profile said his site promoted Holocaust denial but now that’s gone. No mention now.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  105. Tyrion 2 says:
    @John Gruskos

    They sent a letter. It got reported. They’re idiots. That doesn’t change Orban’s opinion on anti-Semitism.

    The important news is that the European Parliament voted to censure Orban even as the British Conservative party voted to not.

    Thankfully we’re leaving but equally thankfully I suspect the vote will be very different after 2019 when Bannon et al organise a Europe wide nationalist coalition.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Svigor
  106. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Wade

    The only thing I can think of is that since you are already a generally well regarded, professionally accomplished individual, with political views many of which are fairly moderate, of Jewish ancestry, with the pieces in question well researched and articulated, the usual denunciations like “antisemite!” simply do not apply and would not stick if they were used anyway. They literally have no M.O. for dealing with a guy like you.

    I disagree with this sentiment.

    Being right about something, having evidence to back up your arguments, is no defense against the witch hunters.

    James Watson was destroyed because he dared to suggest that various human populations have different cognitive abilities on average. Central to that destruction came from individuals who accused the man who co-discovered the structure of the DNA molecule and wrote the definitive book on genetics as being ignorant of genetics!!

    Chutzpah does not even come close to describing such behavior.

    No, competence and clarity of thought will not protect Ron from the witch hunters.

    They will come for him in the same way they came for Watson. Count on it. It already started with David Cole who was incapable of expressing a complete sentence without using profanity or calling names in his argument with Ron Unz.

    Ron has a lot of courage and he will pay a price for that courage.

    In this land of the free and home of the brave you are either with the program or you are a pariah.

    • Replies: @Wade
  107. Anonymous[410] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Tyrion, I just wanted to say that I and probably many people appreciate you wading into these comments to call out the dumbassery and tomfoolery. It requires a hero’s amount of patience, which is why it is seemingly rarely done.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    , @Svigor
    , @Svigor
  108. Svigor says:
    @Yellowford

    Oy vey, shut it down!

    Lulz.

  109. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    You mean Orban’s public pose on anti-semitism. He’s got powerful, vengeful, anti-white Zhids to worry about.

    Organized Jewry knows he’s an anti-semite (as all good men are; c.f. this site’s proprietor).

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  110. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    Perhaps Orban, a man known for his candour, is saying the opposite of what he is thinking. Anything is possible. But my point still stands. Successful European nationalists don’t do anti-Semitism. You can obfuscate all you want but you won’t change this fact, the obvious conclusion of which is that they’re better Generals in this “war” than you because they can at least correctly identify their enemy.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Svigor
  111. Anne says:

    The technical term for the silence with which Mr. Unz’s sensational American Pravda series has met is “dynamic silence.” This was described in Benjamin Ginsberg’s “The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State.” Any open discussion by the ADL and the controllers of American mass culture would simply risk drawing too much attention to topics and facts which the ruling class have striven for decades and decades to occult.

    • Agree: Svigor
    • Replies: @Wally
  112. Svigor says:
    @Anonymous

    Yeah if only the Jooz had a voice, lulz.

  113. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    It’s division of labor, stupid. They do what they have to do, and leave the anti-semitism to people in free(r) countries.

    Sort of like how your verminous cotribalists eliminate free speech elsewhere, and then “right wing” Jews like you work to obfuscate the truth wherever it can’t be eliminated.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  114. Svigor says:
    @Anonymous

    (((Anonymous[410])))

    (You’re wondering how I knew; because only Jews and their paid stooges care. Lol.)

  115. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    It’s division of labor, stupid. They do what they have to do, and leave the anti-semitism to people in free(r) countries

    You think that supermajority Orban has left the crucial muh anti-Semitism to you while all he says are nice things because you’re so great and it is so important?

    Right…

    Or, Orban is a candid guy who speaks what he thinks on Jews (whom he likes) as he speaks what he thinks on everything else, even when it is shockingly un-pc.

    Next you’re going to claim that your mental will is what won the Hungarian election…bizarre.

  116. Svigor says:

    You think that supermajority Orban has left the crucial muh anti-Semitism to you while all he says are nice things because you’re so great and it is so important?

    Right…

    Jew can’t handle actual opponents, so he wrestles strawmen instead.

  117. @Tyrion 2

    Why bother with obsessional anti-Semites? Their world-view stems from something akin to religious revelation: I was blind but now I see. Rational discourse has no place in such a mindset.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Anon
  118. Wade says:
    @lavoisier

    I agree with your sentiments. My only point is that in the case of Ron, they are likely not attacking him to avoid drawing all the media’s attention to his articles. It’s probably a risk-benefit analysis on their part. Unlike Watson, no one can “fire” Ron or banish him from anything. All they can do is call him names and they know that isn’t going to stop Ron.

    They don’t have any recourse right now. Better not draw any undue attention to this website then!

    They may be scheming to do something. I just hope they aren’t planning to do something illegal/unconstitutional like find a way to have his website filtered off of internet searches and things.

  119. Wade says:
    @F0337

    Yeah people were predicting it in the comment sections to Ron’s articles (and other posts) just basically like you are:

    because this site is an important locus of free speech online and having its credibility so thoroughly besmirched by its own founder represents a wound far graver than the ADL is likely to administer. Daresay they could hardly be happier just now.

    You are very wrong. If they were happy and genuinely believed Ron just sunk his own ship, they would be leading the attack by piling it on thick so everyone could watch it go down. People don’t lose credibility by speaking the truth.

  120. Lot says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Unz’s revenge on his Tribe for failing to provide him with a pretty bride has fallen flat. He slanders and slanders, but the ADL just yawns and his old paleocon friends mostly wince and sigh.

  121. Lot says:
    @Tyrion 2

    American Pravda was good for some laughs at Taki’s Mag

    http://takimag.com/article/holocaust-denial-triumphant/

    Ironically the article was written by the prior holder of the title “USA’s Leading Jewish Holocaust Denier.”

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @MannyShovitz
    , @annamaria
  122. Svigor says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Muh dime-store (((psychoanalysis))).

    Congenital Jewish belief: Jews dindunuffin.

  123. Anon[126] • Disclaimer says:

    to Ron Unz

    1) Why isn’t this entry visible at all in the Mobile version homepage?
    2) Why isn’t this entry visible by clicking your name and going to the archive for your entries?

    • Replies: @Dn
  124. Anon[126] • Disclaimer says:
    @JackOH

    It hasn’t been. long since I saw the results of a poll wherein some 80-85% of the responders (North European countries, where they receive top-quality education, have access to every information source, live in multiracial — called “multicultural” — societies) SAID they believe all races ethnicities or whatever are cognitively equal.

    If you have that woman on your romance radar, or just don’t want her opinion of you drop, don’t say to her anything it would surprise you to read on The Guardian or the HuppPo.

    • Replies: @JackOH
  125. I’m sure the ADL is well aware of your article, but they obviously have to make the calculation of whether condemning it, and thereby spreading it to a much bigger audience, is really preferable to ignoring it and more-or-less confining it to Unz.com. They have chosen the latter, which, all in all, seems sensible–for them. The attack/ignore decision is probably what the ADL spends mosts of its decision-making time on.

    But I’d watch your back. I’m sure your truth-telling has not gone unnoticed. They’re probably digging and looking for things that could be used against you, a la Kavanaugh, as we speak. In what way, you should probably ask yourself (at the risk of becoming paranoid), can they possibly “get” you.

  126. Anon[275] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Ron doesn’t meet the ADL’s threshold for notoriety that they feel is necessary to counter with a statement.

    The ADL knows that their comments are widely read, and thus draw attention to whomever they are criticizing.

    Ron put out some powerful articles.

    The ADL’s calculation is that the relatively low readership doesn’t warrant drawing more attention to the articles.

    If Ron wanted to better assure a mention by the ADL, he would have been better served by putting out less-incisive work.

    What they likely will do is allow their SPLC lackeys include Ron in their next cycle of “hate list” additions (if he isn’t included already).

    It won’t be enough to draw significant attention, but will be enough to allow them to reference Ron’s inclusion on the list whenever they have a need to dismiss his work outright.

    As an aside, the ADL seems content to pick guys that look like evil Jewish caricatures for its leaders. That’s curious.

  127. Anon[711] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lot

    David Cole, in his response to Ron, reads like someone who knows how to craft a legitimate argument but needs to avoid doing so because he has a lie to uphold.

    Cole knows better than to rely so heavily on ad hominem attacks, let alone paper thin counter-arguments. They reduce credibility. He really is smarter than that.

    Cole has no other option but to engage in both of those things, because he has a lie to defend.

    Cole’s exchange with Ron was wholly embarrassing for Cole. TakiMag doesn’t have a comments section anymore for a reason. That reason is because they have intellectually dishonest authors on staff like Cole.

    It follows that no one was laughing over at Takimag because Takimag needed to silence the forum just so they wouldn’t be laughed into oblivion on their own website.

    • Agree: Ron Unz
    • Replies: @FKA Max
  128. Anon[926] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Interesting perspective on a people who have been expelled from other nations hundreds of times,

    need highly funded and devoted agencies just to keep the reactionary hostility against them down to a barely manageable level, and

    who felt the need to engage in a decades-long campaign to wholly change the core social values of the major adjacent group just to assure that they wouldn’t be either again kicked out or (once) murdered outright en masse for being who they are and doing what they do.

    And even after all of that, their efforts are falling apart at a medium pace.

    Most psychologists would tell you to save your money (and your projection) and instead to look within.

    That you can’t / won’t is, ironically, precisely we do what we do and you do what you do.

    I’m assured that the current trend against is irreversible. What allows you to sleep at night?

    • Replies: @Wally
  129. JackOH says:
    @Anon

    She’s a deeply conservative Roman Catholic, who, I think, attends a Latin Mass thing locally. Not sure I’m at all right about that.

    My area of Northeast Ohio is accustomed to bluff, hearty characterizations of people from other ethnic and racial groups, characterizations that are essentially throwaway descriptions void of any animus or political content. Maybe I ought to blame Norman Lear’s Archie Bunker for demonizing the idle talk of working stiffs who were trying to find a calculus for getting along with one another in a “multi-culti” America before the intellectuals and politicos started “working it”.

  130. FKA Max says:
    @Anon

    He made a major blunder when he likened the Allies to the Confederacy, in my opinion:

    Also, David Cole’s analogy comparing Jews/The Allies to The Confederacy is dumb and ahistorical, in my opinion, since Jews/The Allies were the victors whereas The Confederacy were the vanquished in their respective conflicts/wars:
    [...]
    The equivalent of this Confederacy analogy and an accurate comparison for World War 2 would be if Germany and Germans had started erecting statues and monuments to honor and commemorate Hitler, Rommel, the Waffen SS, et al. after the German reunification in the 1990s.

    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/#comment-2517842

    Cole might have been genuine in his younger years but I think the JDL aka the Mossad likely got to him, and he is probably working for or at least cooperating with them, in my opinion, as many people in Hollywood do and have done:

    Another factor was a death threat from the Jewish Defense League, a militant, violent group. In January 1998, wanting to start anew, Cole wrote a letter to the JDL, recanting his views.

    The threat was lifted. Cole, his credibility shredded on all sides, adopted the name Stein, chosen because it was simple and short, he said. Only a few close friends knew the secret.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/03/david-stein-cole-holocaust-revisionist

    Hollywood Producer Opens Up About Past as Israeli Operative

    ‘It was like being a 20-something guy whose country decided to let him be James Bond,’ says Arnon Milchan.

    https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-arnon-milchan-secret-agent-1.5294466

    These are also good, skeptical pieces on him:

    I Just Don’t Believe David Cole-Stein

    http://archive.is/kplUe

    David Cole, the Holocaust and Israel

    https://archive.is/ql0x9

    I don’t think Mr. Unz should let his guard down just quite yet or too quickly, since I believe he is really being watched by the Mossad rather than just by the ADL, because, in my opinion, he has been found to be a credible threat to Israel that can’t just be eliminated through character assassination alone, which the ADL specializes in. The Mossad on the other hand doesn’t just assassinate people’s character…

    Hollywood spy: Inside movie producer’s secret past

  131. ADL holds the title of pioneer of US censorship.
    (not good.)

  132. Frankie P says:
    @Svigor

    Dear Svigdor,

    The projection that you are attempting to coin a name for is known as “accusatory inversion”, and it of course entails accusing one’s enemies of committing the very crimes that one is guilty of. The most prevalent manifestation of this mental illness is the concept of antisemitism, which has always been a reactionary phenomenon, an answer to the inherent antigentilism found in Jewish religion, culture, and especially behavior.

    I strongly recommend that you watch some of the videos produced by Herve Ryssen, a Frenchman who has studied and published many works on the Jews. Unfortunately but unsurprisingly, his videos that are subtitled in English are disappearing from youtube. Too much truth.

    Frankie P

  133. @Lot

    The only way a jew could get a pretty bride would be by marrying a Shiksa, but Shiksas don’t like jews, and Dad will threaten to disinherit him if he tries, oh well there’s always the brothels. A Korean working girl told me about her time in an Asian Incall in a jewish neighborhood(Steeles&Bathurst, Toronto) and how a number of her orthodox clients would remove their fake beards before doing the deed.

    • LOL: Mike P
  134. Wally says:
    @Anon

    said:
    “(once) murdered outright en masse for being who they are and doing what they do.”

    Except that they were not murdered “en masse”, just for clarity.

    recommended:
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    http://www.codoh.com

  135. I posted this before on one of Sailer’s articles but I believe as usual he didn’t post it or posted it after the article was listed. You have a problem with Sailer and a lot of people know it. I believe it will eventually hurt you.

    Here it goes: Cochran at westhunt.blogspot.com is having a field day calling you a kook and a few other things. What’s kind of amazing is that many people in the heavy duty scientific field of genetics and evolutionary biology think he’s a kook and is very limited in his understanding of the subject. So perhaps it takes one to know one. Since Sailer posts there a lot I believe this is the problem.

    • Agree: utu
  136. Reading 40 to 50 books in fifteen years, exhausting.
    I’m getting proud of myself, in the last 20 years I read several hundred.
    What I’d never expected is that I would have an opportunity to use the knowledge I got by all this reading.
    Nearly always facts are simply denied.

    Just now in the Netherlands a Muslim conspiracy, yes, conspiracies do exist, has been discovered, seven or so Muslims preparing a bloodbath with a car bomb, kalashnikovs and bomb belts.
    They were not very far, just five handguns, 100kg of fertilizer, and substances for making explosives for bomb belts have been found.

    Of course, the evil Islam, Quran with the jihad is the cause.
    When I try to explain that if one bombs people out of their countries, and forces them to flee to the enemy, that one cannot expect that after arrival there they will love the enemy, great upheaval.
    Muslims are bad because of the evil Islam, w’re the good guys.
    That suicide resistance is nothing special in history, it cannot be true.

    My reading taught me that there is no group of people comparable to jews in the world.
    There is not a shred of doubt with me that they were persecuted from, say around the year zero, until the 19th century, when they got equal rights nearly anywhere.
    They had murdered the son of the christian god, the real explanation, in my view, they made it clear that the pope was not almighty.
    Few people know that the first crusade was against the Albigensians in what now is SE France and NE Spain.
    All of them were killed, a christian genocide.
    Jews somehow, escaped this, bribery is often mentioned as policy.
    Yet jews were killed, pogroms, or left to drown, as is described after they were expelled from England around 1100.

    What I still am unable to understand is why jews, after getting equal rights, and stopped being religious, most of them, remained jews, whatever an assimilated atheistic jew is.
    Maybe just the identity of innocently persecuted people over nearly 2000 years.
    This not to say that before say 1850 jews cannot be blamed of anything.
    Or after, Russian pogroms had to do with ruthless jewish business behaviour, as Solsjenytsyn describes.

    As I stated before, around 1890 one Rothschild wrote to another ‘the only enemy of jews is jews’.
    Who wants to see impossible jewish behaviour decribed I can recommend
    Simon Schama, ´Two Rothschilds and the land of Israel’, London, 1978

    Bernard Baruch is dead, but his virtual son, Soros, does not seem to understand what harm he does to jews or judaism, a Netanyahu to me seems as blind as Soros.
    Paranoia has been mentioned here as cause, one sees this in the writings of Stephen Steinlight, not understanding politics, as he writes that ‘if ever jews are driven out of the USA, they can go to Israel’.
    He does not understand that without USA support Israel is finished.

    The silent ADL, well, an old jewish discussion rule is something like ‘begin with arguments, if that does not held try to smear the opponent, if that also fails, be silent’.

    Harold L Ickes already wrote in his diaries in the thirties that it seemed a good idea to him that the jewish owners of the big papers ignored father Coughlin.

    • Replies: @Mike P
  137. Maybe they let you live so they can identify your readers. I was a musician back in the day. For a few months I had a gig at a road house near a large college campus. The place was always packed with underage drinkers. At closing time there was always one or more deputies idling their cruisers in the parking lot. But they very seldom hassled the drunk students. The Sheriff liked keeping them all in the same place so he could keep an eye on them.

  138. @mark green

    I hesitate to imply any virtue signalling here, but I would be rather strict in terms of evidence & objectivity should some outside organisation see fit to criticise Ron Unz re: his Pravda series. Most regular readers at this site recognise that Mr Unz has been very cautious, even humble, (& yes, courageous) in the marshalling of his evidence & the reaching of conclusions.

    • Agree: mark green
  139. m___ says:

    Congrats!

    Attacking more rational approaches like those of unz.com, and yours (Ron Unz and Pravda) takes more energy, more formal knowledge, all opening up to leveling a debate up. That is not what censure can do best, has the energy for. The niche value, (some of half a million readers with rational mindsets do not compare to the five hundred million crowds that can hold any contradictions taking turns in their same minds) saves you, at least that could be one argument.

    To jump step, Assange was probably silenced because of his Twitter bursts, footing “real life”, American obnoxious elections, before anything else. To compare Ron to Julian is a small step. The difference is probably opinion and research of opinion as to these “bursts” as Twitter requires of Julian.

    A Ron Unz is best silenced by ignoring him, that is the argument we’d like to make regarding the state of unz.com. If and it cannot probably by the nature of the content (all the crap at unz.com is smaller then one can put into one single weekend edition of the New York Times), unz.com would be copy pasted to Twitter, Facebook and Tabloids, to Hollywood productions, TV, only then some flags would to be razed.

    Quality information was never an issue, and yes, many conventional minds must enjoy reading your Pravda series but they will handle the “dangerous” suggestions as most nocive to their careers and not come out on it.

    In that sense, what you are doing Ron is suggesting to the middle class what some there suspect as highly probable in their own limited fields. unz.com has little or no impact on the masses, the most of the deaf middle class and elite circles, by tone (identical to that of the New York Times, with allowance for far better and nimbler editing, statistic relevant analysis, better software, breaking the monopoly of the narrative, collaboration, subject of choice, but the narrative element is there), by content, by level of cognizance, by intellectual requirement, by abject and independent courage, by lack of prime emotion. That is not the most dangerous communication to rouse the back offices.

    Only simple, erroneous, abject ideas are dangerous, hence the Koran, the Bible, Torah, and foremost advertising and targeted info-mercials, suggestions of prime indigenous drift. Crowds are raised and toned by anger, exuberance, fear, genetic drift. That has not changed, indeed you are a suicidal mutation.

    Want to have an impact?, take a knee and have it tweeted globally.

  140. TheBoom says:

    I was also expecting Unz to be in the line of fire of the ADl. In retrospect, Ron may have avoided a full assault because Unz is as anti fragile as a website can be. Ron doesn’t use social media, advertising, or fundraising to build his brand and traffic and stay afloat financially. That leaves them with taking the URL and I don’t think they are ready for that yet. Since they have no immediate way of hurting Unz.com they risk drawing more traffic to it and exposing more people to the thought crimes on it by attacking Ron and Unz.com.

    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
    • Replies: @m___
  141. @Hippopotamusdrome

    Ah, yes, that perennial favorite, that oldie but goldie – the “so & so is Hitler” comparison.
    Love it. It has such great utility: it tells you that the writer is both motivated by malice & is intellectually lazy & unimaginative.

  142. Unz rides again!

    WOOOHOOOO!!!

    The easiest means of testing this hypothesis would for readers to bring these columns to the direct attention of the ADL …

    Poking the dragon in the eye, are you? Gutsy move, Mr. Unz! Keep up the good work …

  143. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    It could be that ADL is ignoring you because it knows that your articles are truth and doesn’t want to draw attention.

    Maybe they are too busy trying to take over Australia.

  144. Cybad says:

    Not so much hiding, and more of not wanting to draw more attention to your articles.

  145. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor

    I’ve been skipping over Tyrion and the posts arguing with him.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  146. Druid says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    I’ve personally witnessed this electrical circuitry in practice!

  147. I suspect the ADL is engaging in the same tactic the Jewish community used against “The Israel Lobby” when it came out, which is to say they realize it’s best to confront it with total silence. No mention of that book on television, no book reviews, none of their usual public pee-in-their-pants-with-hysteria denunciations. The last thing they want to do is deliberately create attention for something (or someone) they desperately want to go away.

    That’s not to say the American Pravda series has not been met with resistance by censors–I know on my end access to these articles as they were published online was damn near impossible on either phone or desktop computer until I downloaded the Tor browser.

    I personally consider the American Pravda series the most important writing done in America in decades.

  148. Anon[382] • Disclaimer says:

    They wait until Ron starts to bubble to the surface of “the conversation,” and then they gingerly poke him back down. When he ran on a slate with Ralph Nader for the toothless Harvard Board of Overseers two and a half years ago, the headlines started to appear, e.g., Boston Globe:

    Leader of bid to shake up Harvard board linked with white supremacist writers

    Which quickly became the anodyne:

    Harvard critic faces scrutiny on donations

    But that was too late to affect the “white supremacist” in the URL. It’s a little taste. Ronny boy, you want more? Just keep on coming.

    I would recommend that Ron do another California initiative. It would have to be carefully crafted to hit some hot buttons that are widely enough supported to give it a chance with today’s California demographics.

    Maybe an initiative that makes University of California employees personally liable in civil court for constitutional violations that involve deliberately conspiring to get around Constitutional limits … such as Proposition 209. Any Californian would have standing to sue.

    Another recommendation for Ron: Submits some stuff to Quillette. That would involve being about to write shorter pieces. But publication in an independent, respected, edited website would help, image-wise.

    Also, apply for membership in the Intellectual Dark Web, and appear on podcasts.

    • Replies: @Sean
  149. Dn says:
    @Anon

    I am just reading this entry from mobile device. I did not do anything about settings, so I guess default behavior is to deliver mobile version to me.

  150. Mike P says:
    @jilles dykstra

    If you have done so much reading – and I don’t doubt it, you have some references at the ready on any subject that comes up here – then you should consider “giving back” and writing some up-to-date and balanced reviews or books on things or events that are misunderstood or ignored by the mainstream. If you do, I’d be happy to help with proofreading/formatting etc. (I have some experience with that, including writing/formatting two books for a major publisher.)

    • Agree: Zumbuddi
  151. Ahoy says:

    I believe a distinction must be made between indigenous Jews of the M.E. and Chazarians Jews of Europe. The indigenous Jews form sizeable communities within the various States of the M.E. and live in peace. In Iran, for instance, they have five members in Parliement. The Chazars are a diferent story. They are a Siberian race like the Slavs and coming to Europe they created the Chazarian Empire and they had no religion. In 700 ad chose the Jewish religion. In 1000 ad they were defeated by the Russians and faned out all over Europe. Mayer Rothchild, the starter of the clan, is a Chazarian Jew as are all European Jews. The Rockefellers, the Kissingers, the Soros and so on are European or white Jews. It is within this group that the Zionist theory was developed for world domination. They are driven by their Rabbis, that never stop to remind them that the goyim must be eradicated from the face of the earth.

    Nasser once said, *There will never be peace in the M,E, because you left Black and came back White*. In today’s Israel the indigenous Jews are a small minority. The vast majority are Chazarian Jews.

    The American scene today has all the signs of going through a huge turmoil. The British Enpire, under the ownership of Mayer Rothchild, could not accept the cry *Give me Liberty or give me Death*, Patrick Henry, 1775, church of St. John, Richmond, Va. A war started for the absolute enslavement of America. After the acquisition of the FED by the gang of Morgan, Rockefeller, Sciff the subjugation was complete. Kennedy tried to turn the game around, but other centers of power had in the mean time acquired higher authority than the Oval Office.

    Trump seems to have khowledge of this small detail and acts differently than Kennedy. Who khnows, may be he will subdue the monster.

    • Replies: @Anon
  152. Svigor says:
    @Anon

    This isn’t even arguing. Tyrion doesn’t rise to the level of “serious and honest enough to argue with.”

  153. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    This is like how successful leftist movements didn’t advocate for suppressing speech…until they gained power. On the contrary, they cynically used free speech advocacy to gain power.

  154. CornCod1 says:

    The correct answer to the question is Overton Window shift. If you wrote this stuff in 1995 there would be a thousand Levantines outside your door with torches. Also, to the current Left anything slightly to the right of RINOism is evil racist, sexist, homophobia ect and in this mid-term election time they would rather attack the moderate Trumpist alt-light than guys like you. BTW, I like the articles very much.

  155. Anonymous[101] • Disclaimer says:

    There seems to be a strategy of attack or ignore. In Mr. Unz’s case, or in some respects Kevin MacDonald’s case, the ignore option is probably the best option for the ADL.

    Ron has money and he’s a very capable guy. MacDonald is also well informed and can win a debate if given the opportunity, and his income is now (I assume) secure. MacDonald was attacked personally and professionally, but his ideas were rarely dealt with in public.

    The attack dog strategy is most effective on those who have less means of defending themselves. Conflict and acrimony will only create publicity for ideas best kept away from the general public.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Carroll Price
  156. @Svigor

    Stop shirking and go do your duty, “right wing” Jews. Go clean up your own back yard. Go straighten out your own people. We are beyond fucking tired of hearing you people yap.

    This is why I am endlessly critical of the Yeshuan cultists. The biggest problems I and my progeny face are those of our forebears’ creation. How do you blame Jews for you or your ancestors being stupid enough to subscribe to their bullshit? We did this to ourselves. Blaming Jews won’t fix it, only purging the stupid amongst ourselves can cure us.

    And by exactly the same lights, how can I have the faintest shred of respect for Jews who do nothing but excuse Jew shenanigans throughout history and our current paradigm?

    If you take a stroll down Rosa Parks Blvd at midnight and get robbed, raped, murdered, then raped again, are you a victim? Or just a retard who got exactly what he should have expected? If you adopt an alien religion as the central organizing feature of your civilization, should you be surprised when it turns out to be toxic to your genome?

    Why are Jews special? That’s the question. And the answer is that we gave them this status. If we hadn’t, they’d be of no more importance here than some hinpoo crapping on the sidewalk and screeching about us eating his sacred cow. Stop worshipping a Jew and Jews generally, and Jews are just another bunch of delusional idiots like Quakers or Mormons. It’s a couple thousand years overdue that we kill YHWH and Yeshua.

  157. @John Gruskos

    Where does Unz publish Creationism?

    • Replies: @John Gruskos
  158. Sean says:
    @Anon

    That is dreadful advice. I am not sure being seen as a threat to Israel is something that would keep one healthy, but if that is the objective I have a suggestion or two.

    There are a couple of reasons that come to mind as explanation for the ADL’s apparent passivity. First, the ADL does not wants to be in the news for taking down a Jewish dissident, that is not going to get the donations rolling in to cover potential cost of a battle against someone with formidable resources. Second, although he may not realise the reason for it (our host looks like he has been burning the midnight oil and lack of REM sleep has a very negative effect on decoding the emotional meaning of events) one recent attempted take down of Ron had a very, very large head-shot apparently because that was thought to discredit the subject better that anything in the text could. If one wants to get his message across he needs to look the part. Let us put it into Hollywood terms. Actor Michael Chiklis interviewed:

    A. If you are an executive at a studio or a network, you’re looking at millions of dollars in budgets, and thousands of working parts. It’s easy to look at people as pieces of a puzzle. This guy fits into that part of the puzzle, and that guy fits in that part of the puzzle. I understood that.

    Q. How did your image change
    A. I had been in a string of shows playing the affable guy, and after one show called “Daddio,” I was really frustrated. I never got a shot at playing the smart, nuanced, grown-up roles. It was my wife who said, “It’s incumbent on you to re-invent yourself. It’s not incumbent upon the networks to re-invent you.” I thought that was brilliant. She was right. But I asked her if she knew what that meant. I would have to change physically, and I would have to refuse to work until I found the right thing. That could get very uncomfortable.

    Don’t get me wrong I am the same age and look worse, but my picture is not part of putting a case in the court of public opinion. With better representation of the author (ie stop allowing oneself to be photographed looking like someone the FBI dragged out of a cabin in Western Montana) the writings would be more effective and the ADL would be getting phone calls from Israeli leaders demanding something be done.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Anon
  159. ADL has their hands full with that terrible antisemite Jeremy Corbyn at the moment. They’ve been pretty busy censoring youtube and fighting Al Jazeera over The Lobby documentary also.

    We’ve got upcoming elections here in ZOG USA too, so they’re probably pretty swamped meddling in all of those…

    It ain’t eazy being sleezy.

    Don’t worry Mr. Unz, you’re on the list, they’ll get around to you eventually. :)

  160. Ron I am thoroughly enjoying your American Pravda series- learning so much. This winter you better treat yourself to a nice short vacation to someplace warm –just lie back for a bit and not burn out.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  161. It’s entirely possible that 1) Unz is an useful idiot, 2) useless idiot but part of the Tribe thus almost protected from harm or 3) in total cahoots with the cabal distracting the readership from totally important things to do… we shall never know his true motivation in continuing with the writings about the esoteric details regarding his own. Nevertheless, it’s informative, elucidating and absolutely fun to read, for who else would give up so much for so little credit… thank you Ron!

  162. tanabear says:
    @John Gruskos

    2. Trutherism – lets Al-Qaeda off the hook for 9/11 and other similar terror attacks, thus diminishing popular outrage at the Israel lobby’s policy of supporting Al-Qaeda in Syria and Yemen.

    The FBI never listed Osama bin Laden for being wanted in the 9/11 attacks either. He was only listed for the embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998.

  163. utu says:
    @Sean

    It would be wise for Ron Unz to carefully review your comments. He his cognizant of various trolls but I am no sure if you are on his radar. You should be.

    You like to get under people’s skin. I see your mind games. I see your relentless pro Israel message and advocating of Palestinian final solution. Also you like to talk about killing dissidents quite a lot with understanding or even with approval. You express surprise when some of them are still alive.

    So when in one sentence you put “take down of Ron” and ” head-shot” I do not think you talk about photography and visage. If I were Ron Unz I would look into it.

    • Replies: @Sean
  164. Ron is able to elide most of their standard tools for enforcement, economic marginalization, denouncements in the media, etc.

    If they can’t get him directly, they can use him to smear others by association or as a poster child for internet censorship.

    I heard they had offshored much of their considerable fortune for reasons unknown. Or maybe that was the Southern Poverty Law Center.

    I share the same concerns voiced by others. These people don’t fight fair. So don’t expect it.

  165. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wade

    Jews have been “in control of the West’s media” for 2000 years.

    John 4:22 We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.

    What “salvation” does the white man need, anyway?

    • Replies: @Svigor
  166. @Johnny Rottenborough

    I think you are correct and I notice one of the shills has already attacked you.

  167. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wade

    I think Gentiles by and large are ignorant that Jewsus thought evil of Gentile’s White Patriarchy (Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, Luke 22:25). Why do Gentiles worship this degenerate Rabbi anyway?

  168. Karl says:
    @Wade

    6 Wade > It’s one of the many wars on “noticing” the media is engaged in

    it’s not the ADL’s fault that you are addicted to the Mass Media

    They are just running their clever racket…. which YOU ARE ENABLING by playing along with the premises

    Has Wade yet thrown away his television?

    • Replies: @Wade
  169. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Tyrion 2, you have never criticized the Jewish State for its support of Nazi revival in Ukraine. This is an ultimate test of your honesty.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  170. Herald says:
    @Tyrion 2

    You really do protest too much.

  171. utu says:
    @Tyrion 2

    This may apply to you:

    In a similar way, a Jew rarely knows or understands what the Jews want from themselves and from bewildered mankind. This lack of understanding causes many fine men and women to proclaim their support (or opposition) to the body politic called ‘the Jews’. Being born and raised a Jew does not help at all, just as belonging to the elite troops does not provide you with understanding of the General Staff’s plans.

    A person of little knowledge is described in the Jewish lore as ‘tinok shenishba’, ‘a kidnapped child’. A kidnapped Jewish child has no knowledge of Jewish customs beyond knowing that he belongs to the Jews. Recently, Israeli President Moshe Katzav described non-religious Jews as ‘kidnapped children’, and even religious Jews have a very limited understanding of the Jewish plans to reorganise the world. Many Israelis vented their anger at Katzav’s words, but he was right!

    Our goal is to understand and explain what ‘the Jews’ want. This task will be a hard one, for the Jews have no obvious leaders who create a single strategy — no headquarters or central command. It is difficult to accept that the Jews can have a strategy yet no strategist; the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are popular precisely because they posit such a supreme (if obscure) strategist. However, ‘the locusts have no king, yet but they attack in formation’ (Proverbs 30:27) — and devastate whole countries as if by plan!

    From: http://www.israelshamir.net/Books/pardes.htm

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    , @Tyrion 2
  172. annamaria says:
    @Sean

    You can also add the following for the sake of argument: https://www.alternet.org/print/world/how-israel-lobby-protected-ukrainian-neo-nazis

    https://www.reddit.com/r/worldpolitics/comments/2r3xx4/how_the_israel_lobby_protected_ukrainian_neonazis/

    “How the Israel Lobby protected Ukrainian neo-Nazis: Rep. John Conyers wanted to block U.S. funding to neo-Nazis in Ukraine, but Jewish civil rights groups ADL and Simon Wiesenthal Center refused to help because the Ukraine fascists are allied with Israel.”

    – And here is the evidence that the Ukraine fascists are indeed allied with Israel: http://www.countdown2040.com/ShowNews/1552/Israel-is-Arming-Neo-Nazis-in-Ukraine/

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  173. Ron Unz says:
    @Anonymous

    There seems to be a strategy of attack or ignore. In Mr. Unz’s case, or in some respects Kevin MacDonald’s case, the ignore option is probably the best option for the ADL…The attack dog strategy is most effective on those who have less means of defending themselves. Conflict and acrimony will only create publicity for ideas best kept away from the general public.

    Yes, that’s certainly correct, and exactly why I doubted they would launch an attack when so many others believed otherwise. But it really is a tricky calculation…

    As I’d mentioned, my recent articles have gotten something like a half-million total pageviews. Obviously, that’s not quite at the CNN.com level, but it’s not entirely trivial either. Furthermore, our overall website traffic has been rising very sharply, so that according to Alexa.com it’s now up to almost 2/3rds of NewRepublic.com, despite the latter’s decades-long headstart. Again not totally trivial…

    Furthermore, I have a couple of hundred reasonably prominent journalists and intellectuals on my regular distribution list, and I’d assume that the overwhelming majority have read at least a few of my “intriguing” articles. Presumably, they’ve also noticed the absolutely deafening silence from the ADL and its friends over the last four months, and therefore drawn their own conclusions on some of the factual points I make. I’ve also been credibly informed that various people at the White House have been reading my articles and been very impressed by some of my analysis.

    Here’s another issue. If the ADL-types have made it a strict policy-decision to avoid attacking me, they obviously can’t attack The Unz Review either. And if they can’t attack UR, they can’t effectively attack any of the other writers for anything they publish here, thereby opening a larger window of freedom for a dozen or more other individuals, which they may gradually decide to start exercising.

    Obviously, there’s a huge downside-risk for the ADL to attack me. But after four months, I think there’s also a growing risk they face if they don’t. And at some point, it’s possible that the two risk-projections may cross, so things will become much more “interesting”…

  174. annamaria says:
    @anon

    “… just two Atom bombs ended years of WWII…”
    – You need to make a research on what actions, and what kinds of sacrifice and efforts, had ended the WWII, and why the atomic bombs were dispatched on the highly populated Japanese cities.
    For instance: https://antinuclear.net/2013/08/13/atomic-bombs-were-dropped-on-high-density-civilian-populations-in-japan-to-make-a-political-statement/

    [MORE]

    “It had been agreed at a conference in Yalta in February 1945 that the Soviet Union would join the U.S. in its war against Japan three months after the Germans were defeated in Europe. At the Potsdam conference between Britain, the U.S., and the Soviet Union in July this was reaffirmed. Germany had surrendered on May 8, and so the Russian army would be marching into Manchuria on August 9, 1945, and soon thereafter on into the Japanese mainland…
    The important question for Truman was how to impress upon the Russians that Japan was not to go the way of a divided Germany as per the Potsdam agreement. The decision to bomb the civilian populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki into oblivion was Truman’s answer to this question. …
    As the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey made very clear, it was of the utmost importance to Truman that “Japan”capitulate to US occupying forces rather than Soviet…” …
    The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not used as weapons of war, but rather as uniquely persuasive negotiating tools to effect a political settlement with our Russian allies, a settlement that would serve as a constant reminder to Russia of its subordinate status on the postwar world stage. Truman’s Secretary of War Henry Stimson wrote in his diary that following the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki there developed in the State Department “a tendency to think of the bomb as a diplomatic weapon,” and that “American statesmen were eager for their country to browbeat the Russians with the bomb held rather ostentatiously on our hip.”
    The real purpose in incinerating two high-density civilian population centers, says Stimson, was “to persuade Russia to play ball.”

    • Replies: @nsa
  175. Sean says:
    @utu

    You may want to look at this

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derailment_(thought_disorder)

    In psychiatry, derailment (also loosening of association, asyndesis, asyndetic thinking, knight’s move thinking, or entgleisen) is a thought disorder characterized by discourse consisting of a sequence of unrelated or only remotely related ideas. The frame of reference often changes from one sentence to the next

    I do wonder about people like David Ray Griffin who write book after book about recent conspiracies such as 9/11 being the work of the US government, pubilise them ever more widely without hindrance, and yet seem oblivious to the possibility of being targeted short of being shot by the conspiracy they profess to have proven. There is more that one way to skin a cat and many ways to discredit, impoverish, frame and imprison people for a government. Maybe the people who really believe in US government 9/11 collusion never talk about it at all. Unlike you.

  176. For my part Ron, I’ve posted numerous of your articles on Facebook (including this one) and will continue doing so as long as Facebook allows my account to remain active.

  177. bucky says:

    Frankly, there is bewilderment. The most notorious is when Unz declares that he has discovered significant fact behind “blood libel” claims and demon worship claims. What do you do with that? He doesn’t lay it out, he just states kind of off-hand that there is significant proof that this happened and he saw this proof and it is convincing. At least lay out the proof. It is just…don’t know where to begin. Not really worth the effort. The readership here are not organized violent people like storefront and others, which is a site with the most convicted murderers posting.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Svigor
  178. @Ron Unz

    Yes Cloudfare is a problem. I also use it for DNS. If I use a VPN with a European IP, it invariably times out and says Unz.com not found.

    Turning off the European VPN allows me to see the pages. Most pages are not a problem, but the ones with 1000+ comments will usually time out.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Ron Unz
    , @Anon
  179. Mr Unz, when you count your supporters count me twice. Thank you for your courageous and honest articles.

  180. @Tyrion 2

    Gosh, it’s enough to make you wonder why such a small number of harmless Jews have been expelled from well over 1oo countries over the past four or five hundred years.

    https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2014/08/15/over-a-hundred-locales-expelled-jews-before-zionism-was-even-a-factor-why/

  181. It reminds me of the famous Sherlock Holmes observation: “The dog didn’t bark”. The ADLs “silent treatment” of you is very interesting. And shows the value of courage. Not “halfway courage”, but the real thing.

  182. Kelso says:

    Your report on the Holohoax is a gem. I have read over
    a hundred books on the subject and find the Hoax
    is an enormous fraud and evidence of rabid goyim
    hatred.
    I suggest those interested read everything by Douglas Reed and Gilad Atzmon. Reed’s “The Controversy of Zion” is a classic on the origins of the Bolesheviks
    and Zionism.

  183. @Lot

    The ADL has only 90,000 followers on Twitter.

    The leader of the ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt, has about 62,000 followers.

    The ADL and Greenblatt are boring boobs who push open borders mass immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    Does the ADL and Greenblatt push open borders mass immigration for Israel?

  184. Ron Unz says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    Yes Cloudfare is a problem. I also use it for DNS. If I use a VPN with a European IP, it invariably times out and says Unz.com not found.

    Turning off the European VPN allows me to see the pages. Most pages are not a problem, but the ones with 1000+ comments will usually time out.

    That’s unfortunate. I’d hoped my software change reducing the HTML size by around 40% might fix that, but I guess not. I’ll take another look about whether anything can be done on the CloudFlare side.

  185. Mike P says:
    @Ron Unz

    As long as they let you, please keep growing the UR – it’s an oasis of freedom and an important public service.

    Some of the themes that you wrote about recently do deserve some ongoing coverage – I’m thinking in particular about 9/11. Maybe for example someone from ae911truth.org would be willing to provide fresh content on this topic? Also, have you seen David Ray Griffin’s new book? Amazon lists it as “temporarily out of stock” – yeah, right. Maybe you could get permission to post it here online? I’d be happy to contribute $1,000 toward any fees involved (maybe more if it makes a difference – if the cost is considerable, a gofundme campaign pitched to UR readers might do the trick).

    Another theme that could do with more public exposure is the scientific fraud referred to as “climate change,” which is nothing but another bit of scare propaganda intended to bring about a world government. (It is pushed relentlessly by the MSM – that alone should suffice to make one suspicious.) This subject is harder to parse than 9/11 or the holocaust – the latter two really took me only days to understand, whereas the climate nonsense took me months. I still don’t understand the science involved as well as I’d like, but I do recognise fraud when I see it.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  186. @Johnny Rottenborough

    But that is not the point. The point is that Jews benefit from an inter-connected support group which behaves like electrical circuitry reacting to a central conductor. It is sometimes claimed that Jews can’t help getting ahead so quickly and gaining the top jobs, they are simply more intelligent than non-Jews.

    In the business world, it’s called “leveraging” which refers to using someone else’s money to make a quick profit based on inside information etc. Politics work the same way, with Jews being masters at both.

  187. Mike P says:
    @Ron Unz

    Maybe offer some website-wide option for not showing comments, or only a limited number of them?

  188. @Lot

    Ironically the article was written by the prior holder of the title “USA’s Leading Jewish Holocaust Denier.”

    And, judging by the puerile tone of its author, worthy of ignoring.

  189. Ron Unz says:
    @bucky

    The most notorious is when Unz declares that he has discovered significant fact behind “blood libel” claims and demon worship claims. What do you do with that? He doesn’t lay it out, he just states kind of off-hand that there is significant proof that this happened and he saw this proof and it is convincing.

    Well, look. I’m absolutely no expert on the activities of Medieval European Jewry, and certainly don’t claim to be. But I cited the 500pp book of Prof. Ariel Toaff, professor of Jewish Renaissance and Medieval Studies at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv and the son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome. He *is* one of the world’s foremost scholars on that subject, and I found his book quite convincing. So just go ahead and buy it on Amazon.com or read the PDF copy available on the Internet, or read two of Israel Shamir’s articles on the subject, all of which I linked in my article, then decide for yourself.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521203083/

    http://www.unz.com/ishamir/the-bloody-passovers-of-dr-toaff/

    Similarly, Prof. Israel Shahak’s books are available at Amazon.com and the most interesting one may also be read on the Internet. All sorts of famous intellectuals have praised his scholarship, so maybe it should be taken seriously. Since I don’t read Hebrew or Aramaic myself, that’s about the most I can say.

    http://ifamericaknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html

  190. The ADL – like the rest of the Zionist organizations – are branches of the British intelligence.

    See: “B’nai B’rite British weapon against America” by Paul Goldstein

    p.16: http://wlym.com/archive/campaigner/7812.pdf

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  191. pensword says:
    @Ron Unz

    As I’d mentioned, my recent articles have gotten something like a half-million total pageviews. Obviously, that’s not quite at the CNN.com level, but it’s not entirely trivial either. Furthermore, our overall website traffic has been rising very sharply, so that according to Alexa.com it’s now up to almost 2/3rds of NewRepublic.com, despite the latter’s decades-long headstart. Again not totally trivial…

    Furthermore, I have a couple of hundred reasonably prominent journalists and intellectuals on my regular distribution list, and I’d assume that the overwhelming majority have read at least a few of my “intriguing” articles. Presumably, they’ve also noticed the absolutely deafening silence from the ADL and its friends over the last four months, and therefore drawn their own conclusions on some of the factual points I make. I’ve also been credibly informed that various people at the White House have been reading my articles and been very impressed by some of my analysis.

    Fantastic news. Thank you for sharing this.

  192. As someone who thinks that the Unz Review is the best site of it’s kind that I’ve stumbled across, my question is how to get more people aware of it?
    Here’s a suggestion; I suspect that many here comment on other sites mainstream or not. If you do then a way to create awareness of the Unz Review is to change your name on these comment sections to something along the lines of UnzReview1 and so on. It’s a easy guerrilla marketing way to advertise this great site. Just a suggestion.

  193. @Ron Unz

    One solution you may consider is pagination to break the page into multiple smaller ones with the option to arrange by recent/oldest/hottest, etc. It does make the site a tad more complicated to navigate, but as your popularity grows, the number of comments will too.

    • Agree: Hippopotamusdrome
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  194. Josecanuc says:
    @Tyrion 2

    “This doesn’t sound like psychosis at all…no sirreee.”

    “Jews are not simply enjoined to study Torah, but to be Torah.” Rabbi Michael Goldberg

    “After you – O Israel – have inherited the earth… and achieved dominion over every living thing on earth…then… shall one nation not lift up sword against another nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.” The Torah

    “You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America.”
    Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache, Israeli Parliament, 2009

    “The whole world is mentally sick, much more so, we Jews.”
    Arthur Ruppin 1876 –1943 Zionist, sociologist, one of the founders of Tel Aviv, taught Sociology of the Jews at Hebrew University, Jerusalem

    “If scholars will only be persuaded to lay aside their prejudices and apply themselves to studying the evidences…I shall be fully content to await the final decision.” Charles Peirce

    “We are only attracted by one circumstance, namely that certain facts, which are far more concealed in other cases, can be observed very clearly in those highly organized groups which are protected from dissolution in the manner that has been mentioned.” Freud, Group Psychology

    “This is the character of truth: it is for all men and it has only to show itself to be recognized, and one cannot argue against it.” Voltaire

  195. m___ says:
    @TheBoom

    Unz has no control of the physical hardware his “cloud” runs on, the Geo-location of the servers, the backbones, the routers, that makes unz.com as vulnerable as can be. “He who controls the routers, the servers, the power switch, his and he only has any control of what creeps through the cables.” Ask the Chinese, and shortly the Russians.

    Though we agree with you, censuring parties might not understand the ground layer of the phenomenon. And Ron, if any-one probably does understand how things are set up, but there is no one single way around it if the receiving end of the communication is not as specialized as he himself. To set up secure communications both ends need to be knowledgeable. Hardware, not software is the ultimate barrier to control.

    • Replies: @TheBoom
  196. Svigor says:
    @Anon

    Oh, it’s the kike again. John 4:22:

    New International Version
    You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.

    New Living Translation
    You Samaritans know very little about the one you worship, while we Jews know all about him, for salvation comes through the Jews.

    English Standard Version
    You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews.

    Berean Study Bible
    You worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.

    Berean Literal Bible
    You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is of the Jews.

    [MORE]

    New American Standard Bible
    “You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews.

    King James Bible
    Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

    Christian Standard Bible
    You Samaritans worship what you do not know. We worship what we do know, because salvation is from the Jews.

    Contemporary English Version
    You Samaritans don’t really know the one you worship. But we Jews do know the God we worship, and by using us, God will save the world.

    Good News Translation
    You Samaritans do not really know whom you worship; but we Jews know whom we worship, because it is from the Jews that salvation comes.

    Holman Christian Standard Bible
    You Samaritans worship what you do not know. We worship what we do know, because salvation is from the Jews.

    International Standard Version
    You don’t know what you’re worshiping. We Jews know what we’re worshiping, because salvation comes from the Jews.

    NET Bible
    You people worship what you do not know. We worship what we know, because salvation is from the Jews.

    New Heart English Bible
    You worship that which you do not know. We worship that which we know; for salvation is from the Jews.

    Aramaic Bible in Plain English
    You are worshiping what you do not know. We know what we are worshiping, for The Life is of the Jews.

    GOD’S WORD® Translation
    You don’t know what you’re worshiping. We [Jews] know what we’re worshiping, because salvation comes from the Jews.

    New American Standard 1977
    “You worship that which you do not know; we worship that which we know, for salvation is from the Jews.

    Jubilee Bible 2000
    Ye worship what ye know not; we worship what we know, for saving health is of the Jews.

    King James 2000 Bible
    You worship you know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

    American King James Version
    You worship you know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

    American Standard Version
    Ye worship that which ye know not: we worship that which we know; for salvation is from the Jews.

    Douay-Rheims Bible
    You adore that which you know not: we adore that which we know; for salvation is of the Jews.

    Darby Bible Translation
    Ye worship ye know not what; we worship what we know, for salvation is of the Jews.

    English Revised Version
    Ye worship that which ye know not: we worship that which we know: for salvation is from the Jews.

    Webster’s Bible Translation
    Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship, for salvation is from the Jews.

    Weymouth New Testament
    You worship One of whom you know nothing. We worship One whom we know; for salvation comes from the Jews.

    World English Bible
    You worship that which you don’t know. We worship that which we know; for salvation is from the Jews.

    Young’s Literal Translation
    ye worship what ye have not known; we worship what we have known, because the salvation is of the Jews;

    Actual context:

    19“Sir,” the woman said, “I see that You are a prophet. 20Our forefathers worshiped on this mountain, but you Jews say that the place where one must worship is in Jerusalem.”

    21“Believe Me, woman,” Jesus replied, “a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22You worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23But a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for the Father is seeking such as these to worship Him. 24God is Spirit, and His worshipers must worship Him in spirit and in truth.”

    25The woman said, “I know that Messiah” (called Christ) “is coming. When He comes, He will explain everything to us.”

    26Jesus answered, “I who speak to you am He.”

    The Disciples Return and Marvel

    He’s just talking chain of custody. Salvation WAS from the Jews. The Jews of the time, who are all gone, by the way; Torah Jews, not Talmud Jews. God gave it to them, then took it away and gave it to the Christians. Now the Jews (all Talmud Jews, none of which existed at the time of John, and to whom Christ was not referring) got shit.

    • Replies: @Anon
  197. @Ron Unz

    I wanted to bring to light a POLITICAL PERSECUTION that is taking place in California right now. YEGORTHERUSSIAN, a youtube commentator that has many videos critiquing US Foreign Policy and public sector corruption was charged with an eavesdropping crime for recording a public official. Russian language channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO3O2bw8YVtryekGYVzop1A/videos [62,000 Subscribers] and English channel https://www.youtube.com/yegorstv [4,700 Subscribers]

    Yegor moved to America in his teens, the son of two Russian Jewish PHd’s. Please write to the City of Hesperia CA and ask for his release. Visit his Youtube Channel and leave comments of support. This is a politically motivated hit on a critic of corruption in California. Ron Unz if you see this, please look into this case. Thank you for your support!

  198. Svigor says:
    @bucky

    Just heard on one of the TRS shows about a Jew/Israeli pedo-murder ring. “Russian” Israeli-led ring was kidnapping Slavic orphans, raping them, then murdering them, all on film. They were based out of Italy, IIRC, but don’t quote me on that part. Might’ve been Greece. Leader escaped to Israel.

  199. Skeptikal says:
    @AKAHorace

    “Obsessing about the past is not a good way to understand the present. ”

    Actually, we don’t live “in a different world.” We live in the same world, a world that is constantly buildng current theories, arguments, and policies on the bones of past events, and the narratives of past events that supposedly underlie and explain them.

    Also, the players are essentially the same, sprung from the actual or the ideological loins of the past players.

    And the interests are mainly the same, the goals.

    In short, it is the same game.
    Denying that—asserting that the game and the game board have changed—is a gambit, one whose aim is to confuse and distract.

    In fact, yours is a trollish argument.

  200. Skeptikal says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    “the option to arrange by recent/oldest/hottest, etc.”

    Please, do not do that!

    The way the comments system works at UR is IMO the best there is and sets it apart from any other blogs I know of in terms of the logical presentation of comments and replies.

    • Replies: @Erebus
  201. @utu

    This task will be a hard one, for the Jews have no obvious leaders who create a single strategy — no headquarters or central command.

    Excuse me for butting-in to add my 2 cents, but the only single strategy Jews seem to share in common is a love for permanent revolution. Why? Who knows? All I know is that, for some strange reason they find it impossible to enjoy anything short of social and political chaos.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  202. @annamaria

    Since Jews will ally themselves with virtually anyone to get even with an enemy (in this case Putin who kicked them out of power) I would not read too much into their current love affair with the Ukrainian Nazis.

  203. @Brooklyn Dave

    Good advice, but I would not recommend Ron getting on an airplane.

  204. annamaria says:
    @Lot

    “Ironically the article was written by the prior holder of the title “USA’s Leading Jewish Holocaust Denier.”
    – You have mistaken Ron Unz for Bibi Mileikovsky: “ISRAEL IS ARMING NEO-NAZIS IN UKRAINE” https://popularresistance.org/israel-is-arming-neo-nazis-in-ukraine/
    “The Azov Battalion uses the Nazi Wolfsangel symbol as its logo. Israeli arms are being sent to a heavily armed neo-Nazi militia in Ukraine. Azov Battalion online propaganda shows Israeli-licensed Tavor rifles in the fascist group’s hands…:”
    – And don’t forget that Ukraine is under a supervision of the ziocon-installed Jewish prime minister Groysman (Yiddish: וואָלאָדימיר באָריסאָוויטש גרויסמאַן)

    https://popularresistance.org/israel-is-arming-neo-nazis-in-ukraine/

  205. AHB says:
    @Wade

    They no longer fear the truth or those who tell it. They sense that their censorship noose has been drawn tight enough already and there is no longer a point to challenging anything said by the censored class.

    Their game is no longer to discredit, its to deplatform, and the free internet is the prize. Anyone who thinks that the constitution, courts, public, or anyone can stand in the way of this is living in a past that simply no longer exists. It doesn’t matter that a few old free thinkers can still read or even find this information. The masses have been inoculated against the truth in an irreversible way, and will be ignored in the same way as we do a homeless person talking to them self.

  206. Ron Unz says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    Turning off the European VPN allows me to see the pages. Most pages are not a problem, but the ones with 1000+ comments will usually time out.

    Actually, could you run some tests for me? The list of articles I’d linked at the top have various different HTML sizes, and if you try them all and let me know which work and which fail, I may be able to figure out whether it’s a size threshold and the value. Then I can decide how best to handle it.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
    , @Cloak And Dagger
  207. @Wade

    I wrote my book Other Losses, 1989 Canada, then der Geplante Tod in Germany, and they left me alone for weeks because the book had amazed them, IE the German haters of this world. It became a best-seller in Germany and Canada because it accused the Americans and French of murdering a million POWS in their camps after the war.
    A year or more went by while they got their engines started but then they were able to shut me down in my own country, Canada, where I had already written a best-selling novel. Not a single book of mine, or article, not even a letter to the editor, has been published since then, unless it was subsidized by me or by a foreign publisher, e.g. Little, Brown in the UK. A Canadian subsidiary of LB “sold” the book in Canada where it was on the best-seller list on the day of publication, then fell off because the publisher ran out of stock!!!! Then Little,Brown Canada told me they had lost 700 hardcover copies in December although the book had been a bestseller and they said they were flying copies across the Atlantic to satisfy orders.
    I have advised Ron to avoid the terms Jews and Jewish and to refer to German-haters because it is more accurate. We all share the hatred of Germans and Germany that we fondly think signifies our virtues.

    James Bacque
    Penetanguishene ON

  208. Erebus says:
    @Skeptikal

    The way the comments system works at UR is IMO the best there is…

    Absolutely agree.
    It remains the best even at 2000 comments, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be improved when it hits whatever size thresholds cause things to slow down.

    Once threads get up over 1000 or so, things slow down grossly for me, often to the point of hanging indeterminately partway through the load. FWIW, I think simply breaking it into pages of (say) 500 comments, with all pages independently accessible from the front page header would solve everything for the likes of myself. Everything else should remain as it is. To be especially avoided are gimmicks like “Best/Hottest”.

    I say “simply” in ignorance of what it would take to do that. Perhaps it simply (ahem) requires too much coding to be worth the candle for what are a relatively small number of articles.

  209. Wally says:
    @John Gruskos

    said:
    “1. Holocaust denial – creates unreasonable levels of skepticism about early 20th century mass murders, thus shielding from scrutiny the Jewish role in the crimes of the Ottomans and Bolsheviks. If we’re too skeptical to believe in the reality of Nazi crimes, even though the Nazis were “caught red handed”, then we are forced to completely exonerate regimes that “got away with it”.”

    [MORE]

    -What’s “unreasonable” about demonstrating the scientific impossibility of the fake ’6M Jews & 5M others’?
    -What’s “unreasonable” about debunking the laughable & impossible ‘gas chambers’?
    - What “Nazi crimes” are you referring to? Please present proof of your allegations.
    - Please present proof for your “red-handed” allegation.
    - Please show us the alleged immense human remains of the alleged total of 11,000,ooo that are claimed to in known locations.

    As Ron Unz has said: “Does anybody seriously believe something so totally ridiculous?”
    see:
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    You seriously do not know what you are talking about. You’ve been called on your BS.

    http://www.codoh.com

  210. Anon[364] • Disclaimer says:
    @Svigor

    Your projection/lying is ironic. I’m not a kike. But you worship one. Worshiping the Jews is getting a bit difficult to defend, isn’t it? Your strained excuse-making is hilarious, trying to hairsplit this Jew from that Jew, as if it matters. You’ve got levels of cognitive dissonance that you never thought possible roaring through your poor head.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  211. Anonymous[364] • Disclaimer says:
    @james bacque

    Or Gentile-haters. Jews don’t seem to hate just Germans. But yours is a good term nonetheless.

    German-haters! Indeed.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  212. FKA Max says:
    @General Hummus

    The ADL – like the rest of the Zionist organizations – are branches of the British intelligence.

    I doubt it… I think the British Royals would have visited Israel more often if that were or had been the case. The Vatican and the organized Jewish community formed an alliance to expel White-Anglo-Saxon Protestants from power in the United States (and in the U.K. for that matter, i.e. Tony Blair’s conversion to Roman Catholicism and his open-borders policies to bring more Catholics from the E.U., e.g. Poland, etc. into the U.K., etc.), e.g. see today’s Supreme Court, Ivy League, etc., which are heavily Catholic and Jewish dominated.

    First Royal Visit to Israel Is Sign of Britain’s Diminished Status in the World

    The Brits are hoping the road to improved relations with Trump and Putin runs through Jerusalem and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

    https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/first-royal-visit-to-israel-shows-britain-s-diminished-status-in-world-1.5866326

    [MORE]

    Why Prince William is the first British royal to visit Israel on a state trip

    https://www.express.co.uk/travel/articles/979726/prince-william-pictures-news-israel-royal-tour-queen-elizabeth

    Prince Charles decried White House’s failure to take on ‘Jewish lobby’ over Israel http://mondoweiss.net/2017/11/charles-decried-courage/

    http://www.unz.com/jthompson/first-year-at-unz/#comment-2123490

    The real power behind the throne and the real threat to “Neoplatonic humanism” and the U.S. has always been the Vatican, through the left-wing, pro-Catholic immigration Jesuits, right-wing, militaristic Knights of Malta and the CIA (aka Catholics in Action), not the so much the British, and Samuel Morse knew that. From the article you linked:

    Samuel Morse, who was part of the overall U.S. political intelligence service numbering Edgar Allen Poe, Winfield Scott, and Washington Irving among its active agents, exposed the Scottish-Hapsburg Rite deployment of Jesuits to America with his pamphlet, “Foreign Conspiracy Against Liberties of the United States.” At approximately the same time, “Oxford Movement” leader John Newman proposed to the Anglican Church that it create a Jesuitical order of its own, so impressed was he with the work of the order in America.

    http://archive.is/XBQU2#selection-489.0-489.521

    Foreign conspiracy against the liberties of the United States. The numbers of Brutus, originally published in the New-York observer, revised and corrected, with notes
    by Morse, Samuel Finley Breese, 1791-1872

    https://archive.org/details/foreignconspiracy00morsrich/page/n3

    This was so since American Judaism, like American Catholicism, having penetrated both political parties, could affect the policies of any USA administration.http://www.unz.com/article/the-elites-have-no-credibility-left/#comment-2037187

    William F. Buckley, a Knight of Malta, Skull and Bones member and CIA operative, was the most notable example in this regard in the modern era, in my opinion, when he purged “respectable” American conservatism of “conspiracy theorists”, anti/counter-Papists, anti/counter-Semites, etc.

    In the Diaspora: William F. Buckley and the Jews
    Steering clear of ‘crackpot alley.’
    https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/In-the-Diaspora-William-F-Buckley-and-the-Jews Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20180930000503/https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/In-the-Diaspora-William-F-Buckley-and-the-Jews

    CIA DOMINATED BY VATICAN, REPORTS NEW JERSEY PROFESSOR INVESTIGATING IT

    (Lest readers of Puritan News believe our assertions regarding significant Vatican influences over the C.I.A. are merely the delusions of crazed Christian radicals, we offer this article which was submitted by correspondent Al Hembd.)

    In fact, almost all the heads and major ranking officers of the CIA have either been Knights of Malta or FreeMasons (as was George Bush Sr–here’s that FreeMason/Roman Catholic alliance again).

    http://www.puritans.net/news/cia122302.htm Archived link: http://archive.is/h2UUu

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  213. @james bacque

    I am gratified that someone of your standing has commented. Sadly, John 8:32 no longer seems to apply to Western Societies: “Then you will know the truth and the truth will set you free. “

    • Replies: @anonymous
  214. FKA Max says:
    @Ron Unz

    Mr. Unz,

    I just noticed that the webzine sidebar in the “Books” section http://www.unz.com/book/ appears not to update and seems to be stuck in July, 2018.

    Thank you very much.

  215. @Ron Unz

    Mr. Unz, why can’t you have a link to each article that is an “article-only” version without comments for:

    a) People like the gentleman above who are having a hard time getting it loaded (if that’s indeed the problem.

    b) People like me who feel they need to read through all of them and don’t get enough sleep some nights. (Yes, I’m blaming you people ;-} Once I get started, I’m kinda obsessed with reading through them. Anything with over 400 that I have not already delved into is one that I’m gonna skip (but may or may not read the article).

    Glad to hear you get lots of views, though I don’t say this in complete agreement with the stuff I did read. I will say that of the millions of page views, once you get lots of comments, most of them will be people looking for replies, replying back, etc. I’d like to know the numbers for unique visits monthly. Heck, I’d like you to explain some of that to me even, as I get stats for my blog and am not always certain what all of them mean.

  216. @Mike P

    I am agreement with your view of Global Climate Disruption(TM) as being one of the biggest pieces of intentional and unintentional propaganda ever accomplished. If Mr. Unz will forgive me for a bunch of links, let me just say this: There is no working mathematical model of the world’s climate, dammit:

    Part 1

    Part 2

    Part 3

    Part 4

    Part 5

    Summary – 1

    Summary – 2

    • Replies: @Mike P
  217. FKA Max says:
    @Anonymous

    They don’t seem to hate German cars and German Dolphin-class diesel submarines ;-)

    Why I’m Ending My Boycott of German Cars

    [MORE]

    My boycott has targeted cars only. Many Jews, of course, don’t participate in this unofficial boycott (proof that it is only partially honored can be found in my synagogue’s parking lot on Rosh Hashanah) and I have recognized for a long while that this boycott is not rational, or rooted in smart policy thinking.

    The first time I visited Israel, I was surprised to see a large number of German cars on its roads. Most taxis are German, and many trucks as well. This is the vestigial byproduct of the reparations paid to Israel, and to Shoah survivors living in Israel, by Germany. I’m guessing that many American Jews who see these vehicles in Israel are at first shocked, and then discomfited, and then find themselves accepting this strange post-World War II reality. I know a couple of people who bought German cars only after visiting Israel. (By the way, for an interesting discussion of German reparations, please see Ta-Nehisi Coates on the subject, toward the end of his important article on the issue of reparations for African-Americans.)

    There’s an even deeper and highly symbolic connection between German industry and Israel—one of potentially world-historical importance—that has helped move my thinking on this subject, and that is the make-up of Israel’s submarine fleet. At this moment, nuclear-armed Israeli submarines are patrolling the Persian Gulf, off the coast of Iran, making sure that the regime in Tehran understands the second-strike consequences of threatening Israel’s existence. The first two Dolphin-class diesel submarines in Israel’s fleet were gifts from Germany, made in the days following the first Gulf War. (German companies had been identified as having sold chemical-weapons precursors to Saddam Hussein’s regime—a very embarrassing development.) Two more were subsequently purchased, and a fifth is on its way.

    The point is, if German submarines are good enough for the Israeli Navy, they should be good enough for a Shoah-haunted American Jew.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/08/why-im-ending-my-boycott-of-german-cars/379310/

  218. @Tyrion 2

    Jews are the most evil people in the history of the world. Just about everything wrong with the world can be directly or indirectly attributed to them.

  219. Anon[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    unz.com has been loading badly on TOR for the last week. I have to hit “new TOR circuit” about 5 times average to get a page to actually load. I also use a European VPN, and for the last 5 weeks, it absolutely will not load dailystormer.name. They’ve gone full cuck over there. I have to use TOR.

    I use both now. Probably isn’t enough. I’m on the Main Core list for sure.

    “There exists a database of Americans, who, often for the slightest and most trivial reason, are considered unfriendly, and who, in a time of panic, might be incarcerated. The database can identify and locate perceived ‘enemies of the state’ almost instantaneously.”

    Main Core Last roundup final roundup

    https://harpers.org/blog/2008/05/main-core-the-last-round-up/

  220. Mike P says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    You are correct – there is no quantitative theory of natural climate variation, so there is no known baseline against which one could quantify any human-made climate change. It is all nonsense top to bottom.

  221. Biff says:

    ADL is possibly worried about the Streisand effect.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

  222. BB753 says:

    What about the Southern Poverty Center? Is Heidi Beirich asleep at the wheel?

  223. m___ says:
    @AKAHorace

    Indeed, history can be detracting from a present with many new variables. History means expression of human nature, and no change in the present but to reference and copy historical pathways and behavior, will lay waste to the future, deaden timeliness, prohibits original aptitudes.

    Historical shabloons is just confirmation to the individual that somehow he is in tune with what human nature stands for. Nothing much, short term vision, exclusiveness, conflictive-ness, no planetary, long time desires, a myopic quantitative (how many comments, as to the few that have any meaning) versus qualitative ambitions of humankind. Once understood, history has served it’s meaning.

    Once oriented, one should focus on the complexity of our times rather then getting lost in the past. Historians are the lows on the scale of intellectual excercion.

  224. Anonymous[423] • Disclaimer says:
    @Carroll Price

    Jews seem to share in common is a love for permanent revolution, say you?

    Matthew 10:35 For I have come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

    Every. Single. Time.

    I suppose I’ll get accused of hating christians again, just because I’m quoting a Jewish Rabbi from the Jew Testament. Why is quoting the Jew Testament so upsetting to christian, anyway? You’d think the Jewsus-worshipers would be overjoyed at the “good news” (lol) being spread.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  225. Anon[382] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean

    You’re talking about this, I presume:

    It’s unfortunate that this photo exists, but it probably accurately represents how Ron looks. I would say, get a shorter haircut, and get shirts and a suit that fit, are smaller, and keep the collar buttoned and the tie unloosened in public. And don’t wear T-shirts when being photographed by the press (as in a couple of other unfortunate photos). Maybe get an update to this head shot:

    The best way to get rid of unflattering photos in the press is to bury them with flattering photos. Journalists don’t like to feel that they are being unfair, even to people they hate, and if only a few available photos are unflattering, most of them will sigh and use the better photos.

    In general, the more video that is available the better, because people get to know how you are as a moving, living being. So appearing on video podcasts would be a good idea.

  226. anonymous[718] • Disclaimer says:
    @Verymuchalive

    John 8:32 should never apply to Western Societies; it’s an example of Jewish back-and-forth boring, boring religious infighting. The white man is stupid to take sides in Jewish infighting between various religious factions within Judaism. Who cares what one Jew thinks of another? Who cares if Jews kill another one?

    White men need to rise above worrying about internal Jewish issues. White men need not worry that some cuckspawn magical Jew from 2ooo years ago thought they needed “saved” from “sin.”

  227. nsa says:
    @annamaria

    Twelve captured American fliers were being held prisoner in Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945. The American authorities knew it and incinerated the city anyways. Want to bet none of the cremated Hiroshima POWs were jooies, hence expendable?

  228. pensword says:
    @Wade

    Nice try.

    No, it isn’t.

    It’s more the raving of a troll.

    Please do not rouse him to leave his hollow beneath the bridge. It’ll be safer for him there.

  229. FKA Max says:
    @FKA Max

    see today’s Supreme Court, Ivy League, etc., which are heavily Catholic and Jewish dominated.

    Off-topic, but I think highly interesting, even for Mr. Unz who is an expert on this particular topic, since I had been wondering for a while how many Catholics versus Protestants attend Ivy League schools. These numbers are for Yale and Harvard. Catholics increased from about 12% of the Yale student body in the 1930s to about 27% in the 2010s:

    [MORE]

    Yale 1930s:

    Yale 2010s:

    What are the religions that most Ivy League students practice?

    The Chaplain’s Office gives a number of 16% non-religious, atheist, and agnostic with 26% Catholic and 16% Jewish. One thing worth noting is that the Protestant group has significantly shrunk over the years where as the Catholics and Jews have grown in number.

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-religions-that-most-Ivy-League-students-practice Archived link: http://archive.is/OjWNr#selection-611.0-611.260

    Here another article on the topic:

    There are more atheists and agnostics entering Harvard than Protestants and Catholics

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/09/09/there-are-more-atheists-and-agnostics-entering-harvard-than-protestants-and-catholics/

    The Whites of the Harvard Class of 2019 are 9.5% Other, 18.7% Atheist, 19.9% Agnostic, 0.5% Mormon, 1.7% Muslim, 17.1% Jewish, 13.3% Protestant and 19.3% Catholic.

    Catholics are actually the biggest religious group at Harvard today, even before religious, but not ethnic, Jews.

    Religion by Ethnicity

    https://features.thecrimson.com/2015/freshman-survey/lifestyle/

    Protestants are likely the most underrepresented group at the Ivy League, even though they founded it and still are about 50% of the U.S. population in 2018.

    This is what the Transformation of America and the American elite looks like…

  230. Anonymous[161] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    This isn’t fashion advice. It’s fashion science. Men’s proper fashion is not an opinion. It has been ested by A/B testing, an application of statistical hypothesis testing.

    [MORE]

    If you have hair, you need to get it cut three times a month by a professional barber. If you have a receding hairline or simply prefer not to have hair, trim it every other day with an electric razor on a “1” setting. Unless you are completely bald, in which case you can use a “0.”

    Self-Help Sunday: Fashion is Not a “Sense,” It is a Science

    https://dailystormer.name/self-help-sunday-fashion-is-not-a-sense-it-is-a-science/

    I f***ing love science!

    The Power Cut: Men With Shaved Heads Look More Dominant

    https://www.livescience.com/23766-shaved-head-dominant.html

  231. FKA Max says:
    @Anon

    Very good PR advice!

    Maybe even hire an image consultant for a while.

    It is probably the last thing Mr. Unz wants to do, but this is how warfare is being conducted in the information age.

  232. nsa says:
    @Ron Unz

    This is the AGE OF PROPAGANDA. unz.com and Ron Unz will never be harmed as they provide a very valuable service to the PTBs in general and the jooies in particular by INNOCULATING the masses of wavering believers against counter arguments. This technique is particularly useful when counteracting “conspiracy theories”. The PTBs and MSM say demented arab terrorists did 911. Unz says some conniving jooies probably did it as they had the most to gain. The PTBs and MSM mention the views of Unz in passing and have a good laugh…..the public has been innoculated against the Unz argument. This is how the JFK assassination “grassy knoll” became the butt of so many MSM jokes. INNOCULATION THEORY was first postulated by Bill McGuire, a Yale psychologist, and one of our favorite assets up until his death in 2007. In short, if unz.com did not exist….it would be necessary for us in Ft. Meade to create something very similar…..and it is very doubtful we could concoct a propaganda vaccine near as effective and entertaining.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @JackOH
  233. Dan Hayes says:
    @Anon

    Anon[382]:

    While appearances are of some importance; much, much more important is the work of any individual. And this especially holds for the person who provides the wherewithal for this wonderful site (namely proprietor Ron Unz).

  234. Anon[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ahoy

    If, as seems likely, you are a troll, you may well succeed in wasting people’s time. But mine not so much, because your absurd disregard of facts as in relating Mayer [sic] Rothschild to the British Empire or anything British circa 1775 completely disqualifies anything you assert from being worthy of attention. (The child of Meyer Amschel Rothschild who eventually became important in England – 1815 notably – was Nathan).

  235. @John Gruskos

    That’s not Creationism. That’s Fred Reed’s clever and funny poking at Darwinist dogmatism.

  236. @nsa

    Propaganda is as old as the world
    Philip M. Taylor, ‘Munitions of the Mind, A History of Propaganda from the Ancient World to the Present Day’, 1995, Manchester
    The idea of objective history even did not always exist.
    ‘Historians’ resided at courts, so they wrote what pleased the ruler.

  237. @james bacque

    My second hand copy in German has a margin annotation ‘I was in this death camp’.
    I wonder if you know
    Paul Bonnecarrère, ´Par le sang versé, La Legion étrangère en Indochine’ , Paris, 1968, 2006,
    it confirms that Germans in French camps could escape the hunger there by joining the Foreign Legion.
    Then there is
    Charles A. Lindbergh, ´The Wartime Journals of Charles A. Lindbergh’, New York, 1970
    He describes a visit to one of the open air camps to interview a German who had been developing an engine for the VIII, that should have been able to reach the USA.
    The man was dying.
    Lindbergh in vain spoke on his behalf to the camp commander.
    Günter Grass, ‘Beim Häuten der Zwiebel’, München 2008
    also was in an open air camp, all he got for weather protection was a piece of tent cloth.

  238. Sean says:
    @Anon

    I am sure he knows all that stuff and more from contact with the press going back decades. And there is also the thing that the picture brings out that no one looks more Jewish than Ron Unz. It’s defiance.

    From a couple of things he has said I get the impression that out host takes pride in operating as a one man army. Guardian a month ago:

    LAST week, an emotional Elon Musk described how he was working so hard to keep production of the Tesla Model 3 on track that he missed his own birthday. “All night – no friends, nothing,” he told the New York Times, apparently “struggling to get the words out”. Musk had, he said, been working 120-hour weeks, often not leaving the factory for three or four days. When he did get home, he said, the choice was between no sleep or taking an Ambien, an insomnia drug intended for short-term use (and blamed by some of Tesla’s board members for his erratic night-time tweeting).

    How Sleep Resets The Brain’s ‘Emotional Compass’. There was a TV program about how Wernher von Braun get to be an American hero and one of his people recalled visiting the rival and then officially backed US rocket team and saw they were going without rest to complete the project. Their rocket blew up on the launch pad.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  239. sarz says:
    @F0337

    I didn’t see anyone predicting any kind of annihilation…

    I have mentioned the possibility, on this site and elsewhere. If it happens to Ron Unz it will probably not be a dramatic event, like the car crashes of Michael Hastings, or, on another continent, Joerg Haider. It would be more deniable, like the deaths of Aaron Russo, another libertarian of Jewish origin, or Hugo Chavez, both by exotic cancers, a known specialty of the CIA and its associates and allies.

    I think Ron knows the score but is now choosing to raise the stakes. Despite the fluoride in the water supply. Mazel und brucha.

    It would be sensible at this point to plan for the future, whatever it might be. Not just a means of assuring editorial succession, but also a feasible way of making the webzine financially self-sustaining, or better, growing into a media empire – a path it is already on, but as a charitable enterprise.

    It could start by offering for commercial sale all the books that Amazon is censoring. Michael Hoffman mentioned what a loss it was that Amazon is no longer offering his e-books. Potential buyers get sucked in by getting the first few chapters for free. This could be done with several living authors who are giving away their life’s work for free. That would also make it feasible to get someone to put up a good, well-produced translation of Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together. And who knows what else. Tomorrow, the world!

  240. @Sean

    The USA obsession with working hard has amazed me for many decades.
    A sensible man organises his work so that he needs eight hours a day.
    After eight hours ral work the battery is empty.
    Nobody can ‘work’ for sixty or more hours a week for longer than a few weeks.
    I always thought that this working hard was no more than being there.
    In the Musk case, who cares if he works ten hours a week or his claimed 120.
    What counts are results, not the effort.

    Around 1980 there was a USA company MMWOPS, Making Money While Other People Sleep, the owner fooled a conglomerate of Dutch near bankrupt shipyards into thinking that he would sell coal digging machines, they trusted him, and produced these things.
    I do suppose they advanced him money.
    Not one was sold.
    The company owner was making long hours, with poker, drink and car racing, if I remember correctly.

    The disaster, the conglomerate was state subsidized with a lot of money, led to a parliamentary investigation, about RSV, Rijn Schelde (?) Verolme.
    Impressive, the investigation, in public, stupidity all around, except, I must admit, by the MMWOPS owner.

    • Replies: @Sean
  241. JackOH says:
    @nsa

    nsa, thanks for the mention of Dr. McGuire and his inoculation theory. I hadn’t heard of him or his theory, so I did a quick search.

    Back when I was a sales manager, I was much interested in sales resistance and sales acceptance. After plenty of experience with a specific product, it seemed as though the tactics for gaining sales acceptance followed mechanical laws. The biological metaphor adopted by Dr. McGuire is no big surprise to me.

    I’ve used the term “political equilibrium” in speech and writing, and I’ve meant it in the sense that one faction’s power of initiative is exactly cancelled by another faction’s power of veto. Breaking up a bad “political equilibrium” is damn near impossible, even when the bad consequences are pretty much right in your face. These damned “equilibria” gather constituents who want things to stay right the way they are.

    I’m a fan of Unz Review, but, yep, I can readily see where the ideas talked about here could be regarded as an inoculant against their being accepted. There’s plenty of thoughtfulness and detail in many of the posts and comments. Just enough to rankle, not enough to rank. As I’d mentioned in a previous comment, there won’t be an Unzian faction informing either major party soon. Still, UR is a good place to muster the rhetoric of dissent.

  242. CornCod1 says:

    A lot of these anti-Christian commenters know very little about the history of Christianity or the Bible. A large number of Christians only became Jew-cucks around 1966 or so with the exception of the idiotic Plymouth Brothers sect and the dumb Schofield Reference Bible in the 19th Century. Google “The Jews and Their Lies” by Martin Luther or translations of the writings of St. John Chrysostom on the Jews. Read the Bible itself and see how St. Paul, a Jew himself, screams at the Jewish converts to Christianity and St. Peter for being snobby toward gentile Christians. Pre-1966, virtually every Christian group and denomination were at the very least politely disdainful of the Jews.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  243. @Anonymous

    I understand the word has gone-out to, when possible ignore holocaust deniers rather than engaging them in debates in which knowledgeable deniers often prove to casual observers that the holocaust is indeed a fraud.

    • Replies: @j2
    , @Zumbuddi
    , @Svigor
  244. @Anon

    WRONG

    Tailcoat with beaver hat and monacle.

  245. @Anon

    LOL. Posted under an article with a picture of a bald guy with dark circles around his eyes.

  246. j2 says:
    @Carroll Price

    “I understand the word has gone-out to, when possible ignore holocaust deniers rather than engaging them in debates in which knowledgeable deniers often prove to casual observers that the holocaust is indeed a fraud.”

    But there are the official story believers and trolls (I think all trolls here come from the same family) and these never change their views. Even if you for one comment get one to admit that the Jewish number for the death toll is 4.5 million, not 5-6 million, he will take it back in the next post, or even if you can for one comment get a believer to accept that the JFK Dictabelt does prove there were more than three shots, he will take it back next time. As this is what they do, the comments on every Unz article can be presented as that the believers of the official story won as they had the last word and never changed their views.

    Therefore the response is that Unz has written some articles on controversial topics. They do not need to be addressed as they already have been fully answered and debunked by commenters on the site. Naturally all crazies do not change their views, but that we have to expect, it is enough that our highly intelligent trolls debunked all claims. A casual observer will not have the energy to read the comments and will indeed believe that this is a fair evaluation of the bulk of comments.

    • Replies: @utu
  247. Sean says:
    @jilles dykstra

    I am reading Matthew Walker’s book https://twitter.com/sleepdiplomat?lang=en

    Musk should pay attention to NASA research cited by Walker showing spiders’ webs on various drugs including caffeine, which is surprisingly deleterious

    Sleep also rebalances your immune system, activated innate immunity has a profound effect on one’s state of mind. (The Inflamed Brain is another good book). A solid eight hours is a lot in middle age, fantastic if you get it though. I think Musk needs to stop putting people off. Once you are on a team you are willing to do the extra because they are your team. That is human nature.

    I half jokingly asked a relative (who actually has the CV) if he was going to seek employment in Musk’s space business, and was instantly told he would not even consider doing that as Musk has announced that anyone who he gives a high level job to must be prepared to work 100 hour weeks. He discourages a lot of highly qualified potential applicants right there. Then he wonders why the people he does choose (from a restricted pool) make all those mistakes. You need one day of rest.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Svigor
  248. Zumbuddi says:
    @Carroll Price

    Re <>

    I’ve also noticed that media outlets deemed highly credible by American public has mounted a sustained effort to broadcast WWII propaganda and film reels glorifying “the Good War” and US nobility in it, as well as continued demonization of Germany, pre-war, in war, post-war.

    The campaign to valorize Jews and vilify Germany is active, multi-media, and relentless.

    Popular fiction is one of the most potent weapons of ADL and those it serves/leads. Pop fiction does not make NYYimes Bestseller list unless Jews are enobled and Germans, Italians, Russians, Arabs and Iranians are vilified.

  249. Tyrion 2 says:
    @annamaria

    I don’t know much about the Ukraine but I don’t believe that the Israelis are big players there nor that Nazis are a sizeable faction on either side.

    Please link me to some evidence that Israel has intentionally and directly supported some actual Nazis there.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  250. Tyrion 2 says:
    @utu

    You might as well substitute in “shapeshifting interdimensional reptiles” for your use of “Jews”. It would make a lot more sense.

  251. Buttweh says:

    My sincerest compliments on your world-class needling of these manipulative whiny worms. I’m at a loss to think how you can top this, but I look forward to seeing you rub it in.

  252. Allan says:

    The ADL’s people are temporarily distracted by partisan concern about the elections this fall, and they may have decided to consult with the ADL’s founding organization for advice about how to manage your special case of Judeophobia with “the best treatment options available”. Who knows what options they are considering. Perhaps visits by prominent Jewish figures or their envoys. Even Sheldon and George? Improbable, yes, but not impossible and it would take some time to plan given busy schedules and the delicacy required.

    You might consider preparing for such a meeting. If it doesn’t happen, cultivate some envoys of your own and send them to George, Sheldon, and others. If they erect stone walls of isolation around theirselves, publish an open letter calling for private meetings to explore options for a peaceful resolution.

    It so happens that the ADL’s mission appears to overlap partially with your own efforts to expose Israelite malevolence. This makes it more difficult to develop a reaction plan. They don’t want to be seen acting contrary to their own alleged values.

    Here is evidence of the ADL’s complementary mission, and as you can see, it relates to a fringe figure.

    ADL Slams Shas Spiritual Leader for Saying non-Jews ‘Were Born to Serve Jews’

    Rabbi Ovadia Yosef says in Saturday sermon that ‘Goyim have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel’; ADL chief calls Yosef’s words ‘hateful’ and ‘divisive’.

    Natasha Mozgovaya, Haaretz Service, 20.10.2010

    Criticisms of Judaism published at The UR, however, are often aimed at the very heart of contemporary Jewish orthodoxy. This makes the ADL’s response, if any, even more complicated. Why would the ADL®, while “Fighting Hate For Good”, want to be maneuvered into the PR fiasco of appearing to be at war with Talmudism? It’s not obvious that the ADL is Karaite, and such bad PR would be bad for their revenues, bad for their salaries, and bad for their resumes and LinkedIn profiles.

    Whatever happens, don’t doubt that you won’t get the attention that you deserve. “Judah” needed seven or eight years to arrange its response of frequent genocidal bombings of German cities after publicly declaring war on Germany in March of 1933. And Hitler’s national communism was far more dangerous to Judah than your website given the more advanced state of German scholarship concerning Judah and its religion.

  253. Anon[560] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Your religion is predicated on corrupting the West toward a future where all people serve Jews who do not work. The proof is littered throughout your texts and speeches, and widely observed in Jewish action. Its the literal basis for your religious eschatology.

    You can’t defend that.

    Its the literal reason why Jews lead the charge (fully create and maintain) dichotomous and ahistorical so-called “conservatism” (Neoconservatism) that is merely gatekeeping for communist social ideals. No natural political structure would so exist. Its existence and lie of good-faith representation disenfranchised conservative voters for decades, essentially creating the power vacuum that has allowed communist social ideals to gain a death grip on this nation.

    Corrupting Jewish political action is much more aggressive than any marginally White non-Jewish actor groups who get caught up in your group’s political wake. The modern communist Left would not exist in any meaningful form without Jews. Again, this all stems out of Jewish eschatological goals.

    However, you are having a conversation that is many years too late. We’re past the point of discussing this. This is not a debate. This is the short process of drawing lines in the sand.

    • Agree: Svigor
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    , @Anonymous
    , @Svigor
  254. utu says:
    @Tyrion 2

    I’m disappointed with you reaction. I thought that the piece by Israel Shamir I posted was framing the issue quite correctly. And possibly shed some light on your intense activity here.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  255. Ron Unz says:

    I just noticed that LewRockwell.com, one of the biggest libertarian websites, just republished my 9/11 Conspiracy article on their Weekend Edition:

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/09/ron-unz/american-pravda-9-11-conspiracy-theories/

    I might easily be mistaken, but I think this is the first time they’ve ever run a 9/11 Truth article, and if so, many of the ideas may reach a category of readers previously unaware of them, which is potentially significant.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Tyrion 2
    , @Art
  256. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Anon

    There is no gap between you and the stupidest black American SJW.

    Let’s see:

    Your race is predicated on corrupting the world toward a future where all people serve whites who do not work. The proof is littered throughout your texts and speeches, and widely observed in white action. Its the literal basis for your so-called civilization.

    You can’t defend that.

    Its the literal reason why whites lead the charge (fully create and maintain) dichotomous and ahistorical so-called “conservatism” that is merely gatekeeping for Nazi ideals. No natural political structure would so exist. Its existence and lie of good-faith representation disenfranchised person of colour voters for decades, essentially creating the power vacuum that has allowed communist social ideals to gain a death grip on this nation.

    Corrupting white political action is much more aggressive than any marginal person of colour actor groups who get caught up in your group’s political wake. The modern neoliberal order would not exist in any meaningful form without whites. Again, this all stems out of white racist goals.

    However, you are having a conversation that is many years too late. We’re past the point of discussing this. This is not a debate. This is the short process of drawing lines in the sand.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  257. @Sean

    At the risk of Fred Reed’s derision at a kind of Just So story which assumes Darwinian evolution based on genetic mutation and natural selection I note that the restorative functions of sleep are likely to be as underpinned by a myriad of genes as intelligence. Accordingly one should expect that the efficiency of a person’s sleep is to be found on a bell curve (maybe with a g factor as well as specifics like analogues to spatial abilities and short term verbal memory).

    Broadly that would lead one to expect that the average adult needs an optimal 7.25 hours and that there is a standard deviation of about one hour. So…. about 1 person in a 1000 could get by on a little over 4 hours without disaster. I suspect that, amongst the many complications one would find that a good proportion of that 1 in a 1000 whose 20 hour a day cognitive abilities one admired would be suffering physical degeneration, maybe even of the arteries, which would kill them young.

    • Replies: @Sean
  258. @Ron Unz

    To conclude the 9/11 story with truth the key must be an inquiry which starts with the examination of the facts alleged to make the four hijacked planes and fire plus gravity caused collapses version untenable. Can you not feed some suitable Congressmen with material sufficient, with persistence, to get up an inquiry without making fools of themselves?

    Mind you I remain of the view that the architectsandengineersfor911truth’s 2 or 3 thousand signatures is deeply unimpressive. I recall that the AGW activists provocations allowed a very prompt signing up of 32,000 “scientists” (probably no better or worse credentialed than the 9/11 truthers) against the alleged 97 per cent “consensus”.

  259. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Ron Unz

    Yeah, visitors to an anarcho-capitalist website have never read any 9/11 conspiracy theories! They’re too enmeshed in the Overton Window?

  260. Anonymous[362] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    You really make one wonder about the intelligence of the Intelligent Designer who allowed hominid progression on the verbal front to a point where one with your problems could string together more or less grammatical correctly spelled English words while factually away in Lalaland. Most Jews are secular. To blame their religion for what you see as pathological behavior is barmy: the madness that consists of ranting on about the stuff of dreams as if it is factual. *Jewish eschatological goals” is the stuff of pure fantasy expressed in almost random words!

    As for their Communist social ideals!! Have you ever met a Jew? WTF are you talking about? From what comic book did you get it?

    • Replies: @utu
  261. utu says:
    @j2

    if you can for one comment get a believer to accept [...], he will take it back next time

    This is pretty common. Not only here. I think this is the nature of beliefs. People do not believe in, say, 9/11 official narrative because they looked at evidence, so you won’t be able to dislodge their belief easily with evidence. Their belief in a particular narrative was created differently with a lot of emotional imprinting, so shedding it would be psychologically devastating for them. And then there are trolls who argue in bad faith. And there are some who might be on your side but make bad arguments which does not help you.

    • Replies: @j2
    , @Zumbuddi
  262. Tyrion 2 says:
    @utu

    I stick a hundred percent behind my last post. Humans don’t work like you describe and the only people that I’ve met IRL who think so are either legitimately stupid or clearly unhinged.

    I imagine the unhinged ones write this babble and the stupid ones read and believe it to feel enlightened.

    • Replies: @utu
  263. utu says:
    @Anonymous

    Most Jews are secular.

    Why do they consider themselves Jewish? Judaism is a part of Jewish identity whether they are atheist or Buddhist or communist. They share the same prejudices as religious Jews in terms of group identity. There are exceptions but very few. It seems that only a genuine conversion to Christianity can successful cure somebody from their Jewishness. This explains why both religious and atheist Jews hate Christianity and Catholicism in particular with equal intensity.

    Israel Shamir addressed the issue in Zeno’s Arrow.

    https://www.unz.com/ishamir/zenos-arrow/

    “You can’t say anything valid about Jews because we all are different”. Probably you have encountered this line. Without recognising it, the responders actually give you the Paradox of Zeno. This Greek philosopher ‘proved’ that Paris did not kill Achilles: at every chosen moment, Paris’s arrow was at a certain point in space, thus it did not move and couldn’t kill.[ii] There is a branch of mathematics called Integral Analysis that helps to deal with the paradox and proves what we know anyway: while an arrow rests at every chosen moment, it actually moves and kills. Likewise Jews: while being different they are perfectly able to act in unison.

    This question is far from trivial; “know thy enemy” is the first political decision, stated the legalist Carl Schmitt. We can’t win until we identify the adversary. For pure Hegelians, “the spirit of Judaic supremacy” is the most suitable culprit, but if the choice is between “Jews, Israelis, and Zionists” the belligerent party is probably the Jewish polity, world Jewry, the carrier of the spirit of Judaic supremacy, despite their plurality of opinions. It is not an enemy of our choosing: it would be easier to have just Hebron and Gaza settlers as the enemy; or some Zionists, at least. But the Jewish polity decided to wage war, and thus became a belligerent party.

  264. j2 says:
    @utu

    ” Their belief in a particular narrative was created differently with a lot of emotional imprinting, so shedding it would be psychologically devastating for them. And then there are trolls who argue in bad faith.”

    I do not think this Unz site is really dangerous to ADL and their ilk. As an example, I think that Iris solved the JFK case beyond any doubt, but I am sure that a casual visitor would conclude that there was a long discussion leading nowhere, the believers did not change their views, neither did the conspiracy geeks.

    There should be something like conclusion, Ron Unz concluding in the next article that we got this far and now can consider the following things as proven, but that may be a bad idea in practice.

    • Replies: @Heros
  265. utu says:

    Iris solved the JFK case

    Do you have a link?

    • Replies: @j2
  266. utu says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Humans don’t work like you describe

    What did I describe? Did you even read my comment which was not really mine because it was an excerpt from Israel Shamir? Yet you responded with “reptilian’ straw man.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  267. Zumbuddi says:
    @utu

    Skinner may be right: rewards reinforce, punishments eradicate.

    I.E. pop fiction authors who hew to the ADL & CIA narrative are rewarded, Thor, Baldacci, Silva, Ignatius are very wealthy despite their less than mediocre talents.

    Those who write a contrary narrative see only rejection letters, or no reviews, or sabotaged readings.

    “Lies are what the world lives on, and those who seek the truth and live their lives in accord are not the many but the few.”

    iow Truth is neither democratic nor ewuivalent to the Majority Opinion.

    Nor is Truth an emotional reaction — that mainstay of hasbara.

    Truth is the mind’s assent to reality, via Logos — Reason = the Order of the Universe.

    Abrahamism explicitly rejects those who “follow the stars” , Logic applied to observation of nature — in favor of an ideology produced by Abraham’s ego.

    What is the solution?

    The Magi– three wise Persians — studied the stars, applied Logos, and found Jesus aka salvation.

    Rather than succumb to Herod’s offer of a reward, The Three Magi took a different route.

    Y’all know the rest of the story.

    Zionisn is Jewry’s 2000 year old ideology of resentment over the destruction of the temple that Herod built.

    The temple is long gone, but Abrahamics and neo-Herodians are still killing people by the millions, in pursuit of that fantasized past.

    But the same stars still trace the Order of the Universe, and Wise Men still follow Logos to achieve salvation (aka The Good Life).

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  268. Tyrion 2 says:
    @utu

    It wasn’t a strawman, it was an accurate characterisation of the words you were quoting in place of your own.

    • Replies: @utu
  269. utu says:
    @Tyrion 2

    In our cultural tradition admission of making a mistake is rewarded. Is it different in Jewish tradition? You deny until you die?

  270. Zumbuddi says:
    @Ron Unz

    Face it, Ron; Unz Review simply does not pose the threat to ADL power that Jason Kessler & his three colleagues did in DC last August.

    ADL & pals organized a counter-protest that cost taxpayers $2.3 million to police.

    ADL also got most of the major religious pooh bahs in DC region to sign onto a letter opposing Kessler’s band, or trio, of “Haters. I’d post the names of that trio but I don’t remember them, never heard of them before or since.

    ADL apparently prefers small, weak targets, just like IDF prefers shooting unarmed Palestinians.

    Or maybe ADL will attempt to destroy individual content-contributors in order to weaken the social fabric of the Unz community – i.e. the Iran Sanctions tactic that Trump boasted of at UN.

    Whatever.

    Probably not prudent to assume ADL will remain quiescent.

    Also, probably a good idea to heed Machiavelli’s caution concerning Savanarola: the monk was bold, and articulate, and no coward.

    But he lacked an army to support and defend him.

    We, who have freely and without risk made use of your Forum, owe it to you to organize Unz’s Army.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  271. Ahoy says:

    The quiet in all fronts could be an order by him.

  272. Ron Unz says:
    @Ron Unz

    Obviously, there’s a huge downside-risk for the ADL to attack me. But after four months, I think there’s also a growing risk they face if they don’t. And at some point, it’s possible that the two risk-projections may cross, so things will become much more “interesting”…

    Just as I suggested, I think the risks of the ADL continuing to avoid battle may gradually grow over time. After all, I’d think there’s a VAST amount of silent dissatisfaction with their decades of oppressive control, and if individuals perceive them as growing weak, there might be a massive revolt against their power.

    For example, I just noticed this new column by PCR, and although I’m extremely embarrassed to reference it, I’ll do so anyway:

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/09/30/ron-unz-for-president/

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @JackOH
  273. Agent76 says:

    9/23/1975 Tom Charles Huston Church Committee Testimony

    Tom Charles Huston testified before the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, commonly known as the Church Committee, on the 43-page plan he presented to the President Nixon and others on ways to collect information about anti-war and “radical” groups, including burglary, electronic surveillance, and opening of mail.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?408953-1/tom-charles-huston-testimony-church-committee

  274. greencrow says: • Website

    I am one of the readers who have enjoyed your recent articles, Ron. I have linked to them on my own blog: Greencrowasthecrowflies. No, the ADL likely has not gone on vacation. They are responding to your facts in their usual way…ignoring…as in “first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you…then you win.” This quote is sometimes attributed to Gandhi. When they “ignore” they are like a duck gliding effortlessly on the surface of the pond, while paddling furiously underneath. There are many “troublemakers” that I can mention that were ignored. Michael Collins Piper being one of the most recent. Just as a tip. Do not spend any weekends in remote hotel rooms.

  275. Sean says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Lack of sleep quite quickly cause one causes one to start believing in daft things.

    [MORE]

    Insomnia and paranoia – NCBI – NIH

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2697325/

    by D Freeman – ‎2009 – ‎Cited by 107 – ‎Related articles
    Keywords: Delusions, Persecutory, Paranoia, Insomnia, Psychosis … 2008a); therefore it is germane that sleep deprivation has long been noted to produce … This sleep disturbance is associated with anxiety and depression (Taylor et al., … Each of the sixteen items (e.g. ‘I was convinced there was a conspiracy

    http://www.alphr.com/science/1001880/17-things-elon-musk-believes
    “The absence of any noticeable life may be an argument in favour of us being in a simulation. Like when you’re playing an adventure game, and you can see the stars in the background, but you can’t ever get there. If it’s not a simulation, then maybe we’re in a lab and there’s some advanced alien civilisation that’s just watching how we develop, out of curiosity, like mould in a Petri dish.”

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  276. JackOH says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron, your call, buddy.

    My nomination for a #1 issue? Affirmative action in all its manifestations. Far from overcoming invidious distinctions that had been drawn by individuals and corporations before the 1970s, affirmative action created new invidious distinctions enforceable by law and by decades of customary practice.

    Again, though, it’s your call.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  277. Ron Unz says:
    @JackOH

    My nomination for a #1 issue? Affirmative action in all its manifestations.

    Ha, ha… Here’s my WSJ column from 20 years ago. Max Boot was their Op-Ed page editor back then, and in hindsight, he may regret having greenlighted it…

    http://www.unz.com/runz/some-minorities-are-more-minor-than-others/

  278. geokat62 says:
    @Ron Unz

    My nomination for a #1 issue? Affirmative action…

    My nomination for a #1 issue? Repeal of Hart-Cellar

    As Lawrence Auster cogently demonstrates in his Path to National Suicide, America’s salvation hinges, in large part, on the repeal of Hart-Cellar.

    http://jtl.org/auster/PNS.pdf

    Ron, do you agree with Lawrence Auster’s thesis in PNS? And if not, why not?

  279. @Sean

    Yes, but do you reject the idea that the bad effects of lack of sleep are likely to be approximately normally distributed for the same reason that equally well fed children of the same parents are likely to be of notably different heights? I.e. polygenetic causes.

    • Replies: @Sean
  280. My dear man, you’re in the best company in your pursuit and unflagging defence of the truth; never fear what the friends of The Enemy may conspire against you, for: “Foul deeds will rise, tho’ all the earth o’erwhelm them to men’s eyes!”, Hamlet. With best wishes, and most grateful thanks.

  281. @Ron Unz

    Indignant responses to your WSJ article like those to your much later TAC article “The Myth of American Meritocracy”?

  282. TheBoom says:
    @m___

    Daily Stormer has shown that there are workarounds for most of what they can do to you technically. The biggest threat unz faces in the near term is bring banned from search and having the URL taken. Unz can exist without appearing in search results and the time isn’t right for them to take URLs. Eventually, they will take the URL but, at least so far, Daily Stormer has shown there is life after that.

    The biggest threat Unz may face in the near term is Ron’s personal safety. If they decide Unz is a big enough threat they may send antifa goons after him but Unz probably doesn’t have enough mass appeal for that to happen yet.

    In the longer term there will be hate speech laws that will be used against Ron but for now that isn’t a threat.

  283. Ron Unz says:

    Actually, there’s one more point I think I should make about the ADL’s strange reluctance to challenge me…

    Here’s a big article that ran in my morning San Jose Mercury News about the high-ranking ADL leader who’s responsible for “policing” Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, namely the person who probably terrifies every right-winger on the Internet:

    https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/09/27/fighting-hate-on-facebook-twitter-youtube-brittan-heller/

    Surprise, surprise—It’s just some silly young woman in her early 30s who majored in English, got a Yale law degree, and now has two cats named Luna and Stella!

    Basically, she’s the person who decides whether Charles Murray or maybe even Donald Trump gets kicked off Twitter!

    It’s not entirely impossible that if she actually read some of my horrifying articles and began checking the references, she’d go into convulsions and lapse into catatonia.

    I’d suspect that most of the ADL activists are a pretty ignorant lot, and perhaps the top ADL leaders are scared to have them actually come into contact with some of the 200-proof Kryptonite information that I provide…

    • Troll: Tyrion 2
  284. @james bacque

    You are absolutely right about referring to “them” as German-haters.
    The Germans have been terribly slandered and libeled by these folks. As one who’s German named born in the US grandfather was treated badly during WWI, I am outraged at the way the great country of Germany has been dragged through the mud by these con artist liars.

    I suggest that this is another important way to fight these folks. There are still a lot of Americans of German decent. If you can get them to understand that the slanders against Germany are not true and that the whole WWI and WW II narratives are BS; this is another way to motivate people to fight. I think a lot of people of German decent would love to learn that Germany is not the bad guy we are supposed to believe it is.
    Yes, call them German-haters and Bolshie s because that is what they are.

    And BTW how can they respond; they call you anti-Semitic, you call them German haters. Why is one worse than the other?

  285. FKA Max says:
    @2stateshmustate

    I suggest that this is another important way to fight these folks. There are still a lot of Americans of German de[s]cent. If you can get them to understand that the slanders against Germany are not true and that the whole WWI and WW II narratives are BS; this is another way to motivate people to fight.

    They already fought back by electing Trump, who is half-German:

  286. hrk says:

    It’s hard for me to imagine the ADL not being aware of these articles, just given the sheer volume of hits. I assumed the website was already experiencing attacks once cloudfare came along. Instead they do nothing, and now Ron has rubbed it in their face (whether intentional or not). I love it.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  287. j2 says:
    @utu

    Do you have a link?

    I mean the two articles by Ron Unz on JFK, the end of the comments. Dal-Tex building being the sniper’s nest and who owned it, including a 32 degree Freemason Zapruder, strange.

  288. utu says:
    @Ron Unz

    The first casualty: C.J. Hopkins kicked out from Counter Punch for Ron Unz claiming that Alexander Cockburn was not 100% Holocaust believer. The theme of Holocaust and Cockburn is repeated in Jeffrey St. Clair emails.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  289. @2stateshmustate

    It cannot be denied that since 1870, German unity made possible by the French attack, problems arose in Germany between jews and non jews.
    Katz, a jewish historian, blames jews, no doubt about it.
    A later jewish defence, Schorsch, just shows, in my opinion, that nobody can defend his own case.
    Then there were jews wrestling with their identity, were they jews or were they Germans ?
    It is difficult to form a moral judgment, but I agree with Katz, jews, not all of them, of course, did not behave very sensibly.
    ‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA
    Ismar Schorsch, ‘Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870 – 1914′, New York 1972
    Jakob Wassermann, ‘MEIN WEG ALS DEUTSCHER UND ALS JUDE’, Berlin 1921
    The title is difficult to translate, but is is something like ‘how to be a German and a Jew’.

    • Replies: @Anon
  290. @2stateshmustate

    Those who do not understand have no idea how many of the present problems in the world find their origin in the victors history: the evil Germans caused two world wars and perpetrated the holocaust.
    Just yesterday in München Germany Erdogan opened a gigantic mosque, in my opinion this would never have happened had Germany been able to to write German history herself.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  291. @Zumbuddi

    ” Zionisn is Jewry’s 2000 year old ideology of resentment over the destruction of the temple that Herod built. ”
    It cannot be denied that jews were persecuted from the time the Roman empire adopted christianity, until the mid 19th century.
    No denial is possible about anti jewish measures in Hungary and Germany in the thirties of the 20th century.
    Also no denial is possible about anti jewish sentiments in for example Poland and Lithuania, before WWII.
    Even in 1967 Poland made it possible for jews to leave.
    That all this causes feelings in a group of people, is their identity, one might say, I’m not surprised.
    What does surprise me is that, as far as I know, no jewish author analyses present jewish behaviour, dangerous to themselves, and dangerous to the world.
    The only exception, Katz.

    • Replies: @Anon
  292. @Ron Unz

    They are ignorant.
    Zuesse wrote here about a 1926 anti jewish speech by Hitler.
    When I explained that at the time Hitler had enough reasons not to like jews, it was just after the German hyperinflation, the result of Versailles, at the time seen as a jewish conference, he got into such a rage against me that did not see that I did not write about the 1929 Wall Street crash.
    Now it is possible that he never heard of the around 1924 German hyperinflation disaster, but being unable to read properly and not google what this hyperinflation was, it does not point to rational behaviour.
    Now this irrational behaviour is not uncommon, alas, the EU is based on the quicksand of the evil Germans who caused two world wars and perpetrated the holocaust.
    Very few historians dare to write that Hitler never wanted war, what anyone can know who reads detailed accounts of the attack on Poland, going into France after this country had declared war, and the defensive war against Stalin.
    I know of just one German book describing the good things Hitler did.
    Kai S. Schreyber (Hrsg.), ´Warum wir ADOLF HITLER wählten, Jungwähler von 1933/38 berichten’, 2001 Kiel

  293. @hrk

    Suppose they are considering the alternatives: silence, or attack.
    Difficult choice nowadays.
    The zionists never foresaw the negative propaganda that Israel would be.

  294. Heros says:
    @j2

    “… a long discussion leading nowhere, the believers did not change their views, neither did the conspiracy geeks.

    There should be something like conclusion”

    I have commented several times on these AP pieces that they were very “milquetoast”. I stand by that assessment in general and specifically for this latest piece which is really just a taunt to what you, J2, call “conspiracy geeks”.

    For example, in his holocaust piece Ron Unz pulled a CYA and stated something like “It is highly likely that far less than 6m were murdered”. He left himself what I called “plausible holocaust denier deniability”.

    In his weird jewish practices piece Ron Unz walked to the precipice of Blood Sacrifice, but would not delve into the depravity of these acts and the ramifications for world history stemming from the fact that they were true, but that there has been an active and militant effort to keep them covered up for centuries.

    I only started reading AP in the last several months, but one thing that has surprised me is the depth of Ron Unz’s personal and professional contacts with what most people now refer to as the “deep state”. Being a jew, Ron Unz already has a leg up when it comes to relations with the deep state because the majority of them are jews, crypto-jews and masons. Ron Unz not only benefits immensely from jewish privilege today, he would have also have had massive “privilege” during the Judaic-Bolschevic takeover of Russia too.

    J2 writes that some kind of a “conclusion” is missing. I think Ron Unz avoids this for the same reasons he avoids analyzing the depths of jewish evil and depravity as has been documented in his past AP articles. To do so would cross the line and invite (((their))) opprobrium, which up until this point they, according to this very article, have withheld. They are willing to tolerate a little truth from a jew on a short leash, and certainly no non-jew would dare calling a jew like Ron Unz “anti-semite”. This same jewish privilege that permeates life throughout the west. When it is beneficial, jews are “whites”, when it is good for the jews then jews are jews.

    So although I am grateful for Ron Unz running this AP series, and even though I thought he would face the wrath of the JP, the fact that ADL and other militant jewish organizations have not come after him is not proof that they do not seek to punish goyim who speak the truth to JP. It is merely proof that Ron Unz has stayed safely behind the red line that JP has drawn for “dissident” jews having close ties to the US deep state. Goyim do not have this privilege.

    • Agree: Mike P
  295. Sean says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Short (4 hour sleepers) tend to have have the CED2 gene. As only 1 in a thousand short sleep there must be some great disadvantage.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  296. JackOH says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron, thanks, I read it. I’m semi-retired, so a lot of stuff is over the dam and under the bridge for me. But, for those White guys who believe affirmative action may have unfairly squelched their job prospects, there’s really no partisan recourse that I’m aware of. I’m not even sure there’s a good way of framing the subject in a letter to the editor, for example, without sounding like a whiny dinosaur.

  297. @Sean

    You naturally prompt thinking about the disadvantages for individuals when you put it that way and I don’t profess to be able to muster even a good guess. But I have often joked that a tribe would want some larks and some owls to ensure protective alertness at all hours but couldn’t have too many Margaret Thatchers who were alert and bossy at almost all hours or there would be dangerous competition for the top jobs.

    • Replies: @Sean
  298. @utu

    That’s a bit hard to follow without access to those Jeffrey St Clair emails. Can you help?

  299. @jilles dykstra

    Presumably there would have been a Turkish leader opening a mosque in Germany if enough Turks had been recruited as cheap labour despite, or before, current levels of automation. So what’s your alternative history which avoids that?

  300. @Zumbuddi

    What makes you think it would be recognisably ADL that attacked?

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Zumbuddi
  301. That Kevin Barrett tweet needs updating: @ADL_National is the ADL’s twitter handle, not @ADL.

  302. utu says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Great question, Wiz. It might be a fall flag with Palestinian or KKK patsies.

  303. Art says:
    @Ron Unz

    For twenty years LewRockwell.com suppressed free speech about Israel.

    Lew had a Jew fund raiser – Lew’s evil bargain was web site funding for silence on Israel. The Jew died, and Lew is now publishing some anti-Israel articles.

    What power – the freedom of the whole libertarian establishment to speak the truth about the apartheid state of Israel was killed by one Little Jew. There is one of those coercive Little Jews in every cultural organization in America.

    Think Peace — Art

  304. fool says:

    Im pretty sure adl never existed as such beyond a nominal board of members.
    Much was done in the orgs name, but the actual resources and labor came from elsewhere.

    Instead it was likely wiesenthal, and as the old fart died and inheritors took over they were expected to do as jewish inheritors do as a rule…. plunder and destroy. With all funds stripped into private pockets, activity ceased and thus adl etc just kinda shriveled up and died. Its not like the members were ding anything for conviction, it was all about a pretty penny that could be earned on german taxpayers-
    Instead southern (levantine) law(-lessness) and poverty (read: wealth) took over some of the policing.
    As i understand it fecesbook uses them to tell fascesbook which accounts writings are evil.

  305. Sean says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Your line of reasoning is becoming useful to me. Four hours a night for both Thatch and Trump. Reading a little it was speculated that the REM sleep is more efficient in these types. However if REM is there to allow one to be a good interpreter of others’ emotional states, then perhaps the advantage of short sleepers is they really don’t care very much what others think because to a great extent they are oblivious to it.

    But, unless you are really very clever and capable, it is usually a terrible disadvantage to be so oblivious that you just go straight ahead and do your own thing. Trump has some very intelligent people in his family tree https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Trump

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Anonymous
  306. Anon[879] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    It cannot be denied that jews were persecuted from the time the Roman empire adopted christianity, until the mid 19th century.

    You’re wholly ignorant of history. Step back a few hundred years (or so) before that, when the Jews tried to destroy Roman culture with their Sabazius cult, for which they were expelled from Rome in 139 BC. The cult had survived as the Baachic cult, to which Rome rightly replied by executing 7000 cult members as threats to the state.

    You’re merely one to cite reactions to Jewish subversion. The Jews, as a politically driven people hostile to foreign states (as they are now), deserved every ounce of so called “persecution” and then some. In all honesty, it obviously wasn’t enough. They Romans ultimately failed to sufficiently stem the tide of Semitic Greek subversion, and the cult reformed and returned as Christianity. That was cultural end (an thus functional end) of ancient Rome.

    Where do you get off asserting that foreigners have the right to exist, and often build a mini state within the borders of other nations? Such a concept undermines the concept of “nation state”.

    No denial is possible about anti jewish measures in Hungary and Germany in the thirties of the 20th century.

    Also no denial is possible about anti jewish sentiments in for example Poland and Lithuania, before WWII.

    See above.

  307. Anon[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Fake angst.

    To be a Jew is to believe in an ‘end of history’ where all non-Jews openly serve Jewish interests with money, work, as well as an agreement to be ultimately governed by Jews.

    That belief system precludes any dual identity (a laughable concept, in general) that would theoretically have a person serve two masters: in this case, the interests of Jews and then of gentile Germans in the German state. The interests of the two groups are in severe conflict.

    Stop with the double talk.

    Stop with the disingenuous efforts to cast a gray pall on what are actually black and white sociopolitics and history. At best, you are rehashing defensive Jewish propaganda.

    One is a Jew or not a Jew. One can not be a Jew and not believe in the Jewish messianic eschatology that I describe above. Thus, if one is a Jew, one cannot be a German. In fact, note the specific first root in ‘Ger-man’, which has an undeniable “not a Jew” connotation in Judaism.

    This conversation is over on the broad stage. You are arguing with no-one.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  308. @Sean

    I’m glad to find someone else interested when the media is so chock a block about the importance of people getting enough sleep – possibly rightly, but seemingly based on the view that we are all average. I would love to be able to get by on much less sleepin more than short bursts. One entrepreneurial billionaire’s mother who eventually lived to be 102 told me she had averaged 51/2 hours a night throughout her adult life (probably not including the naps I remember observing at musical performances she sponsored). Her son is still going strong!

  309. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    “I don’t know much about the Ukraine but I don’t believe that the Israelis are big players there nor that Nazis are a sizeable faction on either side. Please link me to some evidence that Israel has intentionally and directly supported some actual Nazis there.”

    Well, Tyrion 2,
    1. “I don’t believe that the Israelis are big players there nor that Nazis are a sizeable faction on either side.” — Have you consulted with the ADL and Simon Wiesenthal Center on the permissible scale of the Jewish State’s cooperation with the neo-Nazi and banderites in Ukraine?

    2. “Please link me to some evidence that Israel has intentionally and directly supported some actual Nazis there.” — Please check the links that were posted for your personally on the Jewish State’s (Knesset’? the “most moral” IDF’?) support for the neo-Nazis, by providing the neo-Nazis with Israeli-made rifles and with the license to manufacture the Israeli-designed rifles. Again, where has the first Jewish prime-minister of Ukraine Mr. Groysman been when the Jewish State was arming the neo-Nazis?

    3. Don’t forget to check the amazing deeds of the Israeli citizen Kolomojsky, the main financier of the neo-Nazi Battalion Azov. https://quedicenen.blogspot.com/2014/08/ultranacionalistas-ucranianos-del.html

    – Most important, do the research on how Israel “intentionally and directly supported some actual Nazi” on your own. Ask the ADL and Simon Wiesenthal Center to help you financially (these two are very wealthy organizations). Though, considering the both these main squealers about “anti-semitism” REFUSED TO CONDEMN the glorification of Nazism as well as the use of Nazi symbols by Ukrainian civilians and by the Ukrainian military, your will have more luck by doing the research on your own.

    “Rep. John Conyers wanted to block U.S. funding to neo-Nazis in Ukraine. But the ADL and Simon Wiesenthal Center refused to help:” https://www.alternet.org/world/how-israel-lobby-protected-ukrainian-neo-nazis

    http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/foreign_policy_and_government/news.php?q=1417630958

    “If passed, Conyers’ amendment would have explicitly barred those found to have offered “praise or glorification of Nazism or its collaborators, including through the use of white supremacist, neo-Nazi, or other similar symbols” from receiving any form of support from the US Department of Defense.
    The amendment was presented by congressional staffers to lobbyists from Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, two of the country’s largest established Jewish pressure groups. Despite their stated mission to combat anti-Semitism and violent extremism, the ADL and Wiesenthal Center refused to support Jeffries and Conyers’ proposal.”

    Pictures speaks louder than words:

    • Replies: @Mike P
    , @Tyrion 2
  310. Anonymous[276] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean

    Matthew Walker, the author of the recent book on sleep you’re currently reading, says that deep sleep, a phase of non-REM sleep, is the most important for healing and resting the body and brain, restoring and strengthening the immune system, and making people feel rested and refreshed.

    https://www.npr.org/2018/07/20/630792401/sleep-scientist-warns-against-walking-through-life-in-an-underslept-state

    [MORE]

    But we also know that it’s not just the quantity of sleep that changes with aging; it’s also the quality of sleep. And it seems to be particularly the deepest stage of sleep, something that we call non-rapid movement sleep or non-REM sleep and the very deepest stages of non-REM sleep. Those are selectively eroded by the aging process. By the time you’re in your 50s, you’ve perhaps lost almost 40 to 50 percent of that deep sleep that you were having, for example, when you were a teenager. By age 70, you may have lost almost 90 percent of that deep sleep…

    The second discovery, though, is that the sewage system in the brain actually kicks into high gear when we go into sleep and particularly deep sleep. And one of the toxic byproducts that it actually removes at night is a sticky protein called beta amyloid, which is one of the leading causes that – we believe – underlying Alzheimer’s disease.

    So firstly, we start to understand now why short sleep seems to predict a far higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. And it does. That data now from epidemiological studies is there, and I think it’s quite clear. But now we’re starting to understand exactly why insufficient sleep is one of the most significant lifestyle factors determining whether or not you will develop Alzheimer’s disease.

    The two-way street, sadly, is that if that toxic, sticky protein, beta amyloid, builds up in the brain, it doesn’t simply build up everywhere in the brain constantly. It seems to build up in some regions more quickly and more severely than others. And sadly, the regions that it targets very early on and aggressively are the deep sleep-generating regions.

    • Replies: @Sean
  311. c matt says:
    @mark green

    Agree. The ADL can attack you, only bringing more attention and perhaps cause objective observers to question the ADL narrative, or they can hope you remain in relative obscurity. Or, they can get TFAG to non-person you as best as possible. I would see the last as the most probable course of action.

  312. Mike P says:
    @annamaria

    That modified swastika symbol is inspired – if you wanted to denote “Zionazi”, this would be perfect.

  313. Cornelius says:

    Well Ron, by this time in Oct you’ll be America’s leading pedophile. As we speak, the powers that b are lining up testimony from several adults that can testify you’re a friggin perv

  314. Several much friendlier readers commended me for my remarkable bravery, but warned that I should prepare myself for one of the most ferocious onslaughts of attacks and denunciations in recent Internet history. Offhand, that might seem a very plausible prediction. After all, writers with far less visibility and readership have sometimes been fried to a crisp by a blast of vituperation for daring to cautiously mention even just one percent of the controversial claims I had boldly made in my columns. Yet almost no such attacks ensued, except from a couple of rather obscure and marginal quarters.

    I think the answer is that the mainstream Thought Police have collectively decided that they cannot even recognize the existence of any intelligent “alt-right” outlets, as publicly engaging with their ideas and data would only serve to attract attention to inconvenient facts and “normalize” Crimethink.

    When the Left can’t intimidate a speaker into silence by calling him racist, sexist and anti-semitic, their Plan B is to exert behind-the-scenes pressure to “de-platform” the dissenting ideas. But Unz Review is very fortunate to not be dependent on any third-party social media platform, advertising, or PayPal funding. So it is immune for now from the Left’s two main tactics.

    As a result, the Review currently occupies a sweet spot where it is able to fly under the radar of the mainstream SJW mob, while still reaching a mass audience of rational and influential free thinkers. They can’t address it, and they can’t ban it, so they just ignore it.

  315. @Tyrion 2

    Go ‘prove’ yourself yid.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  316. tac says:

    The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today welcomed progress announced by Google and YouTube in blocking and removing extremist content on YouTube. Google recently started using machine learning technology, which has allowed it to remove more than 75 percent of violent extremism videos during the past month.

    ADL is a select contributing member of YouTube’s Trusted Flagger program, created in 2012 to enable organizations to notify the platform of content that violates their community guidelines. Google is a longstanding member of ADL’s Silicon Valley Anti-Cyberhate Working Group.

    https://www.adl.org/news/press-releases/adl-applauds-google-and-youtube-in-expanding-initiative-to-fight-online-hate

    Here is a recent David Icke show that covers Israel’s growing influence and arrogance as it flaunts its international influence while at the same time it shows its disdain for International Law (A good portion of the video covers the downing of the Russian IL-20 over Lebanon but it touches on many other points of Israeli International Influence):

    When Is The World Going to Tell This Man ‘Enough Is Enough’ – The David Icke DotConnector Videocast

    As Israelis are becoming more brazen–and the Western politicians more subservient to a Foreign’s entities wishes, to the detriment of its own citizenry–it becomes more important to wake up more people to this growing threat. Here is just one small token:

    Goyim Defense League (#GDL__National)

    • Replies: @Sean
  317. @Anon

    ” Stop with the disingenuous efforts to cast a gray pall on what are actually black and white sociopolitics and history. ”

    History is never black and white.
    But indeed, the more one, I, knows about history, the more grey it becomes, in the end indeed a thick fog, especially morally, but also to some extent about facts.
    Who can know what at present Trump or Merkel really want ?
    Intentions cannot be observed directly, one can try to deduct them from what policians do.
    Somewhere long a ago I read ‘w’re attacked from all sides, so we must be right’.
    Any, in my opinion, good historian does not paint a black and white picture.
    One of the present day problems is that most people assume one can learn about history by visiting wikipedia.
    Any book of say 350 or more pages presented there in one and a half page.
    Despite now some 20 years of reading mainly history books, several hundred, I am learning every day.
    At present a book about the history of North Africa, where for the first time I find an explanation on how Islam was able to conquer there in a very short time.
    The basis for this was laid centuries before Islam.
    It is quite an effort reading, the book is in French, my fourth language, and the writer is a very cautious one, explaining where he got his views, what doubts exist about them, and why nevertheless he reached conclusions.
    My old brain cracks with the strain of absorbing new facts, rearranging facts already there, and replacing some of them.
    One very interesting thing, the biblical Joshua driving the Phoenicians from present Israel and Lebanon to the west.

  318. Tyrion 2 says:
    @annamaria

    I don’t get it. Can you actually explain how your post answers my previous request?

    I don’t believe that the Israelis are big players in Ukraine there nor that Nazis are a sizeable faction on either side. Please link me to some evidence that Israel has intentionally and directly supported some actual Nazis there.

    Somebody “refusing to condemn” some gotcha type question is simply not that.

    Keep it concise and on topic.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  319. Tyrion 2 says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    No idea what that means but it’d be “sep” not “yid” for me.

  320. Sean says:
    @Anonymous

    I suppose the deep part is what is disrupted by caffeine. I bet the comments here would be quite different if they were all written in the morning after a good night’s sleep. The witching hour is a bad time for being logical. H.P. Lovecraft slept though the day although not very well I expect.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  321. Sean says:
    @tac

    Above is the part of a BBC radio program where you hear about the successful young woman journalist who started seeing conspiracies and things in pictures that were not there. She had an autoimmune disease

    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/jan/13/susannah-cahalan-brain-fire-interview

    David Icke has had the autoimmune disease rheumatoid arthritis since he was 21 years old.

  322. Ron, if you want to grab their immediate attention, slice up the articles into scripts for 10 minute videos to be narrated and posted on YouTube. Maybe pay some video editors to gather relevant clips or graphics like the stuff put out by Prager U. Half a million article views is really not that much when compared to the millions of views such videos could rack up if left on a mainstream platform like YouTube, where random people might accidentally find them. Plus, the videos could be translated by people from around the globe to broaden their exposure. I guarantee it wouldn’t take long for such a project to get blacklisted by ADL’s “limited state”.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  323. gT says:

    “has-the-adl-gone-into-hiding” ???

    Here are 2 possible explanations:

    Firstly, the ADL is unconcerned about UNZ. To borrow from the wording of a 1%’er article found on the web and apply it to UNZ.COM, UNZ might be too insignificant to make a difference, probably reaches only 100 thousand people in a world of 7 billion. And we all know who controls the media, they fill the info spectrum with nonsense, including Kim Kardashian’s rear end, so its highly unlikely that any truth can become widely know.

    Secondly, the ADL doesn’t care about the truth being revealed no more. Can’t remember where I read it now, but the Jews were bragging that in the end, when the New World Order is about to arise with God’s Chosen People in charge, they will reveal all their past sinister activities to World, only it won’t make any difference because their plan is so far down the pipeline that its unstoppable.

  324. JackOH says:
    @Ron Unz

    Well, I’ll go for the gusto here by suggesting a debating tack with respect to ending affirmative action.

    “My opponents would have you believe they and their views are in the cause of justice. Yet, to end an undeserved color bar, they wish to retain an undeserved color bar–against Whites. To break the undeserved glass ceiling, the wish to retain the undeserved glass ceiling–for men.”

    “So confused are my opponents about the nature and meaning of justice, that they would have preferred our 1861-1865 War be fought to enslave Whites.”

    “Ending injustice isn’t about creating new chains. It’s about removing those chains all together to allow free people to live peaceably among themselves as they see fit.”

    You need meaningful pauses and the right body language to make this work. Hey, it’s a thought.

  325. @Ron Unz

    https://spectator.us/2018/09/ron-unz/

    While the ADL itself has been silent about you other mainstream outlets have taken note. The Spectator claims that you’re just a contrarian who went “too far”. He never really addresses the facts of your claims because he thinks repeating them is self-discrediting enough. The minor exception is when he quoted one of Lipstadt’s historians who claimed to have totally discredited David Irving without really backing that up with any specifics.

    The purpose of this article was definitely to scare people away from following your path. You are a prominent person who has come to accept “out there” ideas. If that weren’t bad enough you cite evidence and reasoning which means they can’t just smear you. Furthermore I think your Jewish ancestry would make any accusations of “anti-Semitism” sound absurd.

    What do you think of this article?

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @Sean
    , @JackOH
  326. annamaria says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Let’s keep it on topic: “I don’t believe that the Israelis are big players in Ukraine there nor that Nazis are a sizeable faction on either side. Please link me to some evidence that Israel has intentionally and directly supported some actual Nazis there.”

    Two Qs for the shy Tyrion 2 who cannot believe that the holo-biz narrative has been crumbling before his/her own eyes:

    1. Is Jewish State a player in the zionized and nazified Ukraine?
    2. Is Israeli citizen Kolomojsky, the founder and financier of the neo-Nazi Azov battalion, still an Israeli citizen?

    “Rights groups demand Israel stop arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine. Human rights activists petition the court to cease Israeli arms exports to Ukraine since some of these weapons reach neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine’s security forces:: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/rights-groups-demand-israel-stop-arming-neo-nazis-in-the-ukraine-1.6248727
    “…this is not the first time in which the defense establishment [of the Jewish State] is arming forces that embrace a national socialist ideology.”

    —The Jewish Lobby in the US is on a same page with the Jewish State: “If passed, Conyers’ amendment would have explicitly barred those found to have offered “praise or glorification of Nazism or its collaborators, including through the use of white supremacist, neo-Nazi, or other similar symbols” from receiving any form of support from the US Department of Defense.

    The amendment was presented by congressional staffers to lobbyists from Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, two of the country’s largest established Jewish pressure groups. Despite their stated mission to combat anti-Semitism and violent extremism, the ADL and Wiesenthal Center refused to support Jeffries and Conyers’ proposal.”

    “German ZDF television observed Azov battalion fighters wearing helmets with swastikas and “the ‘SS runes’ of Hitler’s infamous black-uniformed elite corps”, and on other occasions some of the soldiers have been reported to have SS tattoos. … The regiment’s commander and founder is Andriy Biletsky who in the past made statements about “crusade” of “White races” against “Semitic Untermenschen” and is a leader of a Ukrainian organisation called the Social National Assembly which according to the BBC has “typical neo-Nazi narrative” http://military.wikia.com/wiki/Azov_Battalion

    — Do your own research on the collaboration between the zionists and nazis. It has a long history…

  327. Heros says:
    @Bill Smith

    According to duckduck,”Ben Sixsmith” is a Brit millenial twerp who lives in Poland and he has no biographical data on Spectator or anywhere else. He seems awfully judaic to me, especially when I read the typical standard holohoaxer article he wrote. Lives in Poland? Hmmm. Hates Russians like Saker that Unz allows to cross-post? Hmmm.

    I think (((Benjamin))) may be an indication that the tsunami of jewish spittle-flecking fury may be starting to hit.

    At Zerohedge, which used to pride itself in being a commentor “fight club” with no rules, they have recently implemented a new commenting system with all the ADL style bells and whistles like comment filters for keywords and comment flagging by categories that even allows flag comments. Lawyers are forcing ZH to cover its ass from this looming yid-censorship tsunami. This is the trend, and if a chosen website resists jewish demands, it gets threatened and punished in a continuing escalation until it ends up dailystormered or alexjonesed.

  328. Sean says:
    @Ron Unz

    Going by what you said about Leo Frank when mentioning The Jew Accused by Albert Lindemann, your close attention on Frank case would hit the ADL where it hurts. But it would need to be thoroughly researched for months and without the “I am no expert” disclaimers. I think you need to go after their foundational dissimulation. Staking your generalizations on this canonical case, after you have made yourself an unbeatable expert on it, would be the best way.

    • Agree: Wade
  329. Sean says:
    @Bill Smith

    I think Ron stops short of totally endorsing the viewpoints of authors he publicizes. Perhaps he has been misunderstood, but I think the recent articles by him have been trying to say too much. One thing in detail would be more effective.

    The Spectator article is very careless. Emmett Till’s father was the murderer of an Italian woman, not just a rapist. No one denies that he frightened the woman into getting a gun, and Till was in line for a serious pistol whipping, not death. He got himself killed by being recalcitrant and refusing to apologise. Interesting how Ron himself says his wealth is more modest that reported. A super-rich man would have more to lose.

  330. geokat62 says:

    Excerpts from Paul Krugman’s, The Angry White Male Caucus:Trumpism is all about the fear of losing traditional privilege:

    In other words, hatred can go along with high income, and all too often does…

    What distinguished Trump voters was, instead, racial resentment. Furthermore, this resentment was and is driven not by actual economic losses at the hands of minority groups, but by fear of losing status in a changing country, one in which the privilege of being a white man isn’t what it used to be…

    So what we got last week was a view into the soul of Trumpism. It’s not about “populism” — it would be hard to find a judge as anti-worker as Brett Kavanaugh. Instead, it’s about the rage of white men, upper class as well as working class, who perceive a threat to their privileged position. And that rage may destroy America as we know it.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/opinion/kavanaugh-white-male-privilege.html

    So, rather than blaming the cause (The Lobby, in an effort to eradicate antisemitism, pushing for 100 years to fling open the floodgates to mass immigration), Krugman prefers to pin the blame on the effect (what he accurately calls “racial resentment”).

    We need to keep reminding everyone that The Lobby has brought this set of circumstances about. It’s The Lobby, therefore, that must be held accountable for doing so.

  331. geokat62 says:

    Paul Krugman was kind enough to elaborate on the thesis he presented in The Angry White Male Caucus

    Here’s the transcript:

    Now, I do think that this is not a permanent condition. The craziness really comes from almost more from cultural, ethnic issues than anything else. Because you have a lot of the real craziness comes, if you like, from rural, white Americans who feel that they’re loosing their country… they’re loosing ownership of the country. And they’re right. We are becoming more diverse, more multicultural and they are, in the end, they are not the future. In the end, the power they still have will go away. But, it’s a very difficult time until then. So, the future is Mayor de Blasio of New York. But Ted Cruz of Texas is still out there with the ability to do a lot of damage.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  332. Anonymous[276] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean

    Trump drinks about 12 cans of Diet Coke per day, which is the equivalent of about 5 or 6 cups of coffee per day in terms of caffeine.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2017/12/12/trump-reportedly-drinks-12-cans-of-diet-coke-each-day-is-that-healthy/

  333. Hhsiii says:

    Aggregate traffic. Yeah, it’s gonna be like the Dark Side of the Moon or Don Sutton of an article series. Heavy on the sustained counting stat pile up. Which ain’t faint praise. Sustained interest is impressive.

    And Svigor and Tyrion should get a room.

  334. JackOH says:
    @Bill Smith

    Bill, one of my intros to Ron’s work was his piece on Chinese melamine vs. American Vioxx. Maybe 4 or 5 years ago. If my memory’s okay, that piece helped demolish those American clichés we want to believe–meaningful rule of law, respect for the individual, treating people as ends and not means, all that. My take-away was that it supported my growing belief that America wasn’t just at odds with its clichés, but massively at odds with its clichés.

    I read the Spectator piece. Maybe a better question is not whether Ron is a contrarian gone haywire, but whether he hasn’t gone haywire enough. I write that as a selective reader of these pages who finds some of the contentious opinions here a bit “out there”. I’m inclined to give Ron a lot of slack in his publishing choices and his own opinion pieces.

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @geokat62
  335. Anonymous[101] • Disclaimer says:
    @Stanley Parable

    This is actually a good idea. There is an ocean of video on YouTube, some of it very informative, but it’s usually produced by amateurs – and it shows. The poor presentation, unfortunately, can sometimes diminish it’s credibility.

    It would be amazing to get something with a really tight script and high level production values. A series of short films aimed at the sort of people who aren’t necessarily stupid, but who may not read a website such as UR.

    Some enterprising producer (who never wants to work again!) must be out there and up for a challenge?

  336. Anonymous[101] • Disclaimer says:
    @geokat62

    Whenever there is absurd, disturbing, grotesque, freakish, violent activity on TV, it is rarely emanating from ‘Rural America’. Rural America is relatively stable compared to the tense circus of the multi-cultural metropolis.

    You could get rid of Rural America completely and the ‘crazyness’ factor of America would barely be affected. This is obviously just a bias held by Paul Krugman.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  337. Anonymous[353] • Disclaimer says:

    Has the ADL Gone Into Hiding?

    Hardly. Four of my comments have been disappeared from another IP.

  338. Blindlight says: • Website

    Looking at your arsenal of writers, I would say they don’t want to rock your boat. Also, I have detected this in general on this site, touchy subject matter is delivered in as friendly way as possible

  339. I think Anamaria in her exchanges with Tyrion2 has explained well why the power elite supports more exposure of jewish wrongdoing: To provoke revanchist reactions against Russia.
    It isnt new, nazism and zionism were both created by the British elites and later the angloamericans have been working the Ukraine since the thirties (in addition early on using some german nazis even before Hitler rose to power if I remember correctly) to foment disunity.
    Nikolai Starikov has shown a pattern used by the empire, first Britain than the angloamericans.
    The pattern consists in creating an anti. For Russia it is now Ukraine. For China it was Taiwan.
    For India it was Pakistan. For the mid 1800s in the US the anti was the Confederates, but that time the anti was brought back partly because the Russians came to support Lincoln.
    All the zionist jewish organisations spring originally from British freemasonry and the initial motive was for Britain to use the jewish networks as proxies to gain control over the Us.
    That kind of info is entirely absent in everything I have read from Ron Unz. I dont insinuate that this is deliberate on his part, just saying. Britain is by a wide margin the true elephant in the room as far as historical truth is concerned.
    Otherwise I also came to similar conclusions about the jewish authors he cites while I consider Ron to have fallen into a trap when he tried to rationalise Hitler.
    The reason why it is dangerous to rationalise Hitler is because it hides that he was a duped entity who never understood that he was Britains useful fool all the way. A recent addition to the slowly surfacing honest history regarding Britains true role is the discussion about Rudolf Hess by Sylvain LAFOREST. The original in parts posted at orientalreview.org
    John Allen at Veteransnewsreports has apparently posted the whole text therefrom.

  340. geokat62 says:
    @Anonymous

    You could get rid of Rural America completely and the ‘crazyness’ factor of America would barely be affected. This is obviously just a bias held by Paul Krugman.

    Speaking of craziness, check out this video:

    Liz Hayes of 60 Minutes Australia interviewed Jared Taylor about Donald Trump, race differences, “hate speech,” interracial relationships, and white identity.

    The program first aired April 30, 2017.

    Here is the most pertinent excerpt, starting @ 48:49

    LH: That’s why I was asking you: when did this happen? Because everything seems to point to it not happening to you.

    JT: Most of the time it does not happen to people. But, you seem to treat it as some sort of a psycho-pathalogical condition (LH: no, no, no) and sort of seeking the ideology of this absurd development. No, I stumbled onto the truth and I resisted the truth for many years. And, as I say, I would prefer to remain a liberal in all these respects. But, I don’t think you could build a successful society based on illusion. Adlai Steveson once said that: given a choice between disagreeable fact and agreeable fantasy, Americans will go for the phantasy every time. The idea that we’re going to build this successful, happy society which race could be made not to matter is a beautiful fantasy. Just as the communists tried to build a society on a fantasy. They thought they could build a society in which selfishness was going to be eliminated: from each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Doesn’t that sound lovely? And it inspired many, many people. And look at the millions of cadavers that were left behind in that attempt. I believe that the United States and practically every western European country is trying to build a society on an illusion that is equally mistaken as that of the communists. And, finally, more and more white people are waking up to this illusion. And, that is why you have Donald Trump’s success in the United States, why what is called, I think mistakenly, the “extreme right” is rising in Europe, and it is why we had Brexit. White people are finally waking up to find that what they’ve been told all of these years is wrong. There is something about race that is part of identity and that it’s genetic. And that we must, while we have the chance, seize the opportunity to pursue our own destiny and not be submerged by people who are unlike ourselves.

  341. geokat62 says:
    @JackOH

    I read the Spectator piece.

    I read it, as well. And, if what was published in the Spectator – USA article is indeed true, it appears that while Ron may have no major concerns with the introduction of Hart-Cellar, he does have serious issues with its potential consequences – i.e., the growth of white nationalism.

    Excerpt from, The curious case of Ron Unz
    The former publisher of The American Conservative is a case study in contrarianism gone haywire
    :

    … but [Unz’s] most significant and controversial essay, for the neoconservative journal Commentary, put Proposition 227 into the context of ‘California and the End of White America’. Unz approved of the demographic transformation of the state and the US but emphasised the need to promote assimilation or else face native discontent. ‘There are few forces that could so easily break America as the coming of white nationalism,’ his essay concluded.

    https://spectator.us/2018/09/ron-unz/

    Excerpts from, California and the End of White America: In the state that is a laboratory of our ethnic future, the choices about to confront us as a nation

    [MORE]

    Two alternate futures present themselves—which might be labeled the new American melting pot and the coming of white nationalism—and the recent politics of California lends some plausibility to each. America’s continued viability as a nation may well depend upon which of these two paths we choose…

    But the ideology that evolved to justify these programs also radically changed the terms of the American social compact, replacing the emphasis on assimilation with an emphasis on ethnic difference.

    Two further events occurred simultaneously with the completion of the old American racial agenda, and they drastically magnified the impact of this ideological change: the passage of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act, which reopened America to large-scale immigration after a 40-year hiatus

    Over the past 30 years and at a growing pace, more than 25 million new immigrants—80 percent of non-European origin—have entered America, and they and their descendants now constitute a rapidly growing fraction of our total population.

    Well over half of these new immigrants have been Hispanic, and this ethnic group—today defined in racial terms, with all the attendant special treatment under official government policies—will by itself represent between 20 and 25 percent of America by the middle of the approaching century, at which point Americans of European origin will have become a minority of the population…

    Since the 1960’s, the deepening ideological decay of the American melting pot, especially among the journalists and intellectuals who shape our thoughts, has transformed our official self-image from that of a nation of individuals living in a common culture into that of a nation of groups arrayed against one another in an ethnic spoils system. Multiculturalism and “diversity” thoroughly dominate our nation’s schools and politics and public discourse, encouraging minorities to exercise influence through the mobilization of ethnic or racial grievance. Under this framework, the rise of a similar ethnic-grievance movement among America’s emerging white minority is likely, perhaps inevitable.

    Already there are early warning signs of such a movement… Although so far these developments and others like them are minuscule, and the individuals involved make every effort to avoid even a hint of extremism, evolving white-bloc politics could eventually develop a white-nationalist orientation or fringe

    But surface appearances are deceiving. Underlying social dynamics, whether in California or in the nation at large, have not changed, and ethnic conflict, temporarily submerged, has far from disappeared. To the contrary, given the nature of the demographic processes now at work in the country, the potential for such conflict is growing rather than diminishing, and any sudden crack in our unprecedented economic prosperity might well be the occasion for its revival

    It is therefore a tragedy of the first order that, even as the reality of the American melting pot remains as powerful as ever, the ideology behind it has almost disappeared, having been replaced by the “diversity” model and by the politics of grievance. A social ideology that allots to blacks and Latinos and Asians their own separatist institutions and suggested shares of society’s benefits cannot long be prevented from extending itself to whites as well, especially as whites become merely one minority among many minorities. Before it is altogether too late, those who support this status quo must realize that the diversity prescription contains the seeds of national dissolution.

    America today stands as one of the very few examples in history of a large and successful multiethnic society. If we are to continue and extend our success—which is hardly foreordained—we can only do so by returning to the core principles of Propositions 209 and 227: ethnic assimilation, and individual equality under the law. Otherwise, we face the very real threat of future movements along the lines of Proposition 187, each worse than the last, and on a national scale. There are few forces that could so easily break America as the coming of white nationalism.

    https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/california-and-the-end-of-white-america/

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  342. Ron Unz says:
    @geokat62

    I read it, as well. And, if what was published in the Spectator – USA article is indeed true, it appears that while Ron may have no major concerns with the introduction of Hart-Cellar, he does have serious issues with its potential consequences – i.e., the growth of white nationalism.

    (1) Actually, I think the (not unreasonable) piece in The Spectator is the exception that supports the rule. The Spectator is a UK publication, and hence probably outside the “zone of influence” of the ADL.

    (2) Regarding immigration, I’ve published a vast amount on that subject over the years, and if you’re interested in my opinions, you might want to take a look at a couple of my more recent pieces:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-republicans-and-the-end-of-white-america-singlepage/

    http://www.unz.com/runz/a-grand-bargain-on-immigration-reform-2/

    Basically, I have a pretty practical and empirical view on immigration, which sometimes can be positive and sometimes negative, depending upon the particular current circumstances.

    (3) Asking my opinion on the Hart-Celler 1965 Immigration Act is a little tricky, mostly because 99% of the anti-Immigration activists are totally confused.

    Contrary to the almost universal belief, the 1965 Immigration Act didn’t OPEN the door to heavy immigration, it CLOSED the door.

    The key point is that the 1924 Immigration Act put in place very sharp restrictions upon *European* immigration, but kept an absolutely “Open Borders” policy towards immigration from Mexico and the rest of Latin America (and the Western Hemisphere in general). Prior to 1965, there were NO LIMITS to Latin American immigration to the US. So if the 1965 Act hadn’t passed, there might very well be 2x or 3x more Latin Americans living in the US today, something that really, *really* surprises anti-immigration types when I explain it to them.

    I’m sure you’ll be shocked and disbelieving about this, but here’s a brief passage in Kevin MacDonald’s book that discusses it:

    http://www.unz.com/book/kevin_macdonald__the-culture-of-critique/#p_53_26

    The reason everyone’s confused is that (A) The 1965 Act was described as loosing immigration restrictions and (B) within a decade or two, there was a large increase in Latin American immigration. But (A) and (B) actually had absolutely no connection.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @mark green
    , @Sean
  343. Ron Unz says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    The last two links failed, the threshold seems to be around 2000 comments and 10,000 words:

    I made some changes in the code, now implementing various things via Javascript so as to reduce the size of those very large HTML files by another 25-30%. Let me know if that’s enough to allow you to now load those 2000+ comment pages.

    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
  344. geokat62 says:
    @Ron Unz

    (3) Asking my opinion on the Hart-Celler 1965 Immigration Act is a little tricky, mostly because 99% of the anti-Immigration activists are totally confused.

    Totally confused, Ron? They might be after reading this passage:

    Contrary to the almost universal belief, the 1965 Immigration Act didn’t OPEN the door to heavy immigration, it CLOSED the door.

    That’s not what the data suggest:

    It appears that immigration was at its lowest levels in the period subsequent to 1924 and prior to 1965.

    The key point is that the 1924 Immigration Act put in place very sharp restrictions upon *European* immigration, but kept an absolutely “Open Borders” policy towards immigration from Mexico and the rest of Latin America (and the Western Hemisphere in general).

    While it’s true that the legislation set no limits on immigration from other countries of the Americas, including Latin America, I don’t think you’ve fairly characterized the intent of this legislation.

    According to this reliable source, the purpose of the 1924 Immigration Act was “to preserve the ideal of American homogeneity.”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924

    Here’s another source:

    In all of its parts, the most basic purpose of the 1924 Immigration Act was to preserve the ideal of U.S. homogeneity.

    https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/immigration-act

    Here’s a fuller description of the legislators purpose:

    The law was primarily aimed at further decreasing immigration of Southern Europeans, especially Italians; and, to a lesser extent, immigrants from countries with Roman Catholic majorities, Eastern Europeans, Arabs, and Jews. The law affirmed the longstanding ban on the immigration of other non-white persons, with the exception of black African immigrants (who had long been exempt from the ban). Thus, virtually all Asians were forbidden from immigrating to America under the Act. Subsequent court rulings would determine that Indians and Arabs were not white and could not immigrate…

    And here’s the part that speaks to what most Americans will be surprised to learn – i.e., that hispanics were considered to be whites back then:

    Contrary to popular belief, Latin Americans were not prohibited or limited from immigrating under the law. In most states and under federal law, persons of mixed white and Native American ancestry were considered white; this principle was interpreted under the Act to allow Latin Americans to immigrate as “white persons.” Moreover, unlike Eastern and Southern Europe, no nationality-based quotas were placed on Latin American immigrants. Thus, the law allowed unlimited Latin American immigration, just as it allowed unlimited northwestern European immigration. Ironically, the 1965 immigration law that replaced the 1924 Act, though abolishing racial preferences and national quotas, would effectively place greater restriction on Latin American immigration.

    Prior to 1965, there were NO LIMITS to Latin American immigration to the US. So if the 1965 Act hadn’t passed, there might very well be 2x or 3x more Latin Americans living in the US today, something that really, *really* surprises anti-immigration types when I explain it to them.

    Perhaps you could explain the following data to this anti-immigration type:

    Both the size and composition of the U.S. foreign-born population have grown since 1960, rising from 9.7 million to nearly 40 million in 2010. Latin Americans were a major driver of this trend, as their numbers soared from less than one million in 1960 to nearly 19 million in 2010. – excerpt from, Latin American Immigration to the United States

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/

    Now let’s contrast Johnson-Reed with Hart-Cellar.

    Source #1:

    Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965

    The Hart–Celler Act abolished the quota system based on national origins that had been American immigration policy since the 1920s. The 1965 Act marked a change from past U.S. policy which had discriminated against non-northern Europeans. In removing racial and national barriers the Act would significantly alter the demographic mix in the U.S.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

    Source #2:

    The Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Celler Act, abolished an earlier quota system based on national origin and established a new immigration policy based on reuniting immigrant families and attracting skilled labor to the United States. Over the next four decades, the policies put into effect in 1965 would greatly change the demographic makeup of the American population, as immigrants entering the United States under the new legislation came increasingly from countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America, as opposed to Europe.

    https://www.history.com/topics/immigration/us-immigration-since-1965

    I’m sure you’ll be shocked and disbelieving about this, but here’s a brief passage in Kevin MacDonald’s book that discusses it:

    Odd you would cite this passage by MacDonald, as it concludes with the following sentence:

    Clearly the forces of liberal immigration really wanted unlimited immigration into the United States.

    As i’ve previously mentioned, Lawrence Auster was convinced America was on the path to national suicide. For America to survive, he believed that it had to retain its European identity and that immigration policy should be crafted to achieve that end.

    I believe that Auster was right and that is why I favour the repeal of Hart-Cellar, notwithstanding the fact that the definition of “white” may need to be revised to exclude mestizos, this time around.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  345. @Ron Unz

    Ron- For lack of a better word, you seem ‘confused’ about the intent and impact of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act. This amazes me.

    Have you read MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique”? Did you read the entire chapter you cite on Jewish activism vis-a-vis US immigration laws?

    In the chapter on Immigration, Kevin MacDonald makes it clear that Jewish groups have worked tirelessly and brilliantly for many decades to transform the ethnic composition of the United States, to the deliberate disadvantage of its founding, European stock. Do you dispute this?

    Jewish intellectuals have also helped establish double-standards to the detriment of Anglo Saxon Americans and to the advantage of ‘hyphenated’ Americans, which also includes Jewish Americans.

    According to MacDonald, Jewish organizations have also used blacks and black ‘civil rights organizations’ as battering rams against America’s fading Protestant establishment. He presents powerful and copious evidence to substantiate this case.

    The names of the original founders and leaders of the NAACP, for instance, reads like the guest list at an orthodox Jewish wedding. It’s astounding. Yet, as MacDonald makes clear, Jews never allowed blacks to penetrate any of their own pro-Jewish organizations. Jews have cleverly used blacks to undermine White civilization. But they have steadfastly refused to take the medicine that they prescribe for others.

    Top-tier Jews have been waging a quiet and concerted war on White America for over the past century. Henry Ford complained about this bitterly 100 years ago. Indeed, Jewish duplicity and Jewish subversion are among the major topics of “Culture of Critique”.

    The subversive Immigration Reform Act of 1965 was endorsed and sponsored by numerous Jewish politicians (Jacob Javitz, Emmanuel Cellar, et al) as well as powerful and influential Jewish NGOs such as the ADL and the American Jewish Committee.

    So please, let’s make no mistake about it: the ‘liberal’ and ‘humanitarian’ 1965 Immigration Reform Act did, in fact, open the floodgates to problematic, non-White immigrants from far outside of Western and Northern Europe. This change may make Jews ‘feel safer’ in America, but what about the rest of us?

    Crypto-Jewish groups such as the ACLU have also been on the forefront of ‘de-Christianizing’ the US, as MacDonald ably demonstrates.

    Race loyalists such as Madison Grant spoke out against these insidious movements, and predicted our modern-day dilemma if the pro-immigrationist prevailed; which they have. Prof. MacDonald explores this also.

    The 1965 Act not only ‘upset’ America’s racial status quo, but planted the seeds of an unsought, unwelcome, and dangerous ethno-racial transformation that is still underway.

    Millions of White Americans quietly believe that this change is damaging our nation irreversibly. Moreover, the unsought changes that Jewish groups have championed for (White) America are anathema to pro-Jewish policies that have been and are being implemented inside Israel today. Talk about hypocrisy! No. Actually, it is far worse than mere hypocrisy. Is it deliberate sabotage and strategic subversion.

    • Agree: geokat62
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  346. JackOH says:

    “Why The Unz Review’s American Pravda Essays Are Absolutely Must Reading for America’s Presidential Candidates in 2020″.

    Put together an essay that tells readers why your American Pravda series is important for the contenders in the 2020 election. Distribute to partisan leaders, think tanks, media. The responses will help you make a decision on whether to run yourself. Plus, you’ll help frame the Pravda series for the convenience of readers who want some guidance on how to handle it when they recommend these pages to colleagues and friends.

  347. Sean says:
    @Ron Unz

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407978/#S6title

    Yet, as Figure 6 clearly indicates, Mexicans nonetheless bore the brunt of the deportation campaign launched in the name of the war on terrorism, comprising 72 percent of those removed in 2009. The likely dynamic by which this outcome unfolded is summarized by the path diagram shown in Figure 7, which uses time-series data from 1965 through 2009 to estimate the effects of the two principal Islamic terrorist attacks on the number of deportations and through them on the conservative reaction, in addition to the ongoing effect through border apprehensions.

  348. Ron Unz says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    An improvement, but one still fails:

    That’s too bad, but at least I now know the size-limit is right around 5 MB. Maybe it’s a CloudFlare limit that I can somehow adjust. And even if not, it was probably worth making that change.

    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
  349. Ron Unz says:
    @geokat62

    It appears that immigration was at its lowest levels in the period subsequent to 1924 and prior to 1965….

    While it’s true that the legislation set no limits on immigration from other countries of the Americas, including Latin America, I don’t think you’ve fairly characterized the intent of this legislation.

    According to this reliable source, the purpose of the 1924 Immigration Act was “to preserve the ideal of American homogeneity.”

    Sure, that’s all true, but the 1924 Immigration Act did NOT apply to Latin America or the rest of the Western Hemisphere. It continued to allow UNLIMITED immigration from Mexico and those other countries.

    In fact, Lothrop Stoddard and some of the other anti-Immigrationists of the era tried to extend the 1924 Act to include Latin America, but in Congress they were defeated by Texas business interests, which said immigration was too important to be restricted.

    The main reason Mexican immigration stayed low was that Mexico was under-populated back then, and it was the Mexican population boom in the 1960s and afterward that caused the large rise in immigration. If the 1965 Act had NOT been passed, Mexican immigration to the US might have been vastly larger.

    For example, in the 1920s, there was a huge wave of French-Canadian immigration into New England, greatly resented by the local citizens. But since there were no legal limits on Canadian immigration, there was nothing they could do about it.

    I realize it takes some time digesting the fact that everything you know about a subject important to you is actually upside-down or backwards, but that happens to be the case.

    Over the last dozen years, I’ve periodically pointed out this mistake to various anti-immigration websites denouncing the 1965 Act. They’ve checked, said Oops!, and stopped talking about the 1965 Act for a while. But obviously they can’t take down the 1000+ pieces they’ve previously published and they’d look ridiculous if they admitted their mistake, while everyone else on the Internet continues denouncing the 1965 Act. So after a couple of years, they usually go back to doing the same.

    I’m pretty much given up on setting the record straight, and I probably shouldn’t have bothered raising the issue here, since it’s now forced me to waste some time explaining it.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  350. Ron Unz says:
    @mark green

    Ron- For lack of a better word, you seem ‘confused’ about the intent and impact of the 1965 Immigration Reform Act. This amazes me.

    Sure, the “intent” was exactly what you say, and certainly Jewish groups were very heavily involved in the effort. The 1965 Act was publicly aimed at *liberalizing* immigration policy, and that’s absolutely correct. It certainly did so with regard to European, Asian, and African immigration.

    However, back then nobody cared or paid much attention to Latin American immigration, and in that case, the legal impact was exactly the *opposite*. It sharply restricted Latin American immigration for the first time in American history since the 1924 Act had kept an Open Borders policy there.

    Now for the half century after 1965, Latin American immigration turned out to be much larger than European, Asian, and African immigration combined, and would have been *vastly* greater still if not for the 1965 Act.

    So the “intent” of the 1965 Act was liberalizing but the actual “impact” was restrictive. My other long comment discusses this in further detail.

    Don’t feel too bad. Like I said, probably 99% of people interested in immigration issues are similarly confused about the situation.

    • Replies: @mark green
  351. Svigor says:
    @Anon

    No, sorry Jew, God is not a Jew, and Jesus was not a Jew (his father was not Jewish). And he certainly wasn’t a Talmudic Jew, which is all they have now.

    Talmudic Jewry is all there is left, the inheritance of the Jews who killed Christ.

    Yes, specificity is hard for stupid people; the biggest war in the history of the universe was fought between National Socialists and International Socialists but some people are too dumb to see the difference, or its importance.

  352. Svigor says:
    @Anonymous

    You and the Jews, united in hating Christianity.

    What am I saying? You’re united in your Jewishness.

  353. Svigor says:
    @CornCod1

    A lot of them are probably just yids acting out the congenital yid anti-Christian impulse.

  354. Svigor says:
    @Carroll Price

    The real problem is not “proving” anything, it’s just the alarming gap between the official narrative, and what emerges after holocausts and revisionists do battle. It’s enormous. There’s really no way to “win,” in a strict sense, but the inevitable exposure of this gap is extremely unsettling for normies, and devastating for Jews. It’s like hearing your whole life how Mike Tyson is this invincible negro god of boxing, then watching some 150 lb. Russian nobody fight him to a standstill for 12 rounds. The Russian doesn’t have to win; the deity has been destroyed, regardless.

    They have a religion to protect.

  355. Svigor says:
    @Sean

    SpaceX’s “mistakes” seem to be succeeding in grand fashion.

  356. Svigor says:
    @Anon

    Yes, Jews are too late. WNism is now past the point where it could be strangled in its crib. Now begins the long Jewish rearguard action.

  357. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    There are several problems with the “WNs sound like blacks” thing:

    1. Jews and blacks. Politically, they’re pretty much identical. Jews are like blacks with a 108 mean IQ. They vote the same, approach the world the same way, etc.

    2. Whites don’t follow Jews or blacks around. Whites don’t mind being excluded from Jewish or black spaces.

    3. Jews and blacks go ape at mere mention of the notion of being excluded from White spaces.

    4. Jews are the original dindunuffins. Centuries before blacks adopted the dindunuffin mantra, Jews had already been practicing the Jews dindunuffin mantra for centuries. Whites don’t do this.

    Etc.

    “Right wing” Jews always “revert” into leftists, once Jews become the topic. It’s too tedious to go into here in detail, but once you know to look for it, you can’t miss it. Try it the next time you hear a “right wing” Jew defending his tribe from right-wing crit. Itemize his “arguments” and look for how many are leftist arguments (that the same Jew was debunking five minutes ago when a black was using them).

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  358. Svigor says:
    @Ron Unz

    Tyrion: LOL, thanks for fighting the good fight on behalf of the ADL, my man!

  359. @Ron Unz

    And even if not, it was probably worth making that change.

    Yes, reduction of data transmitted is always worth it. As your articles increase in popularity, so will the number of comments, and the accompanying size of the page to be loaded. Even the link above that now loads, takes quite a while to do so even with my 1 Gbps connection (I don’t know what your upload bandwidth is). If CloudFlare has some sort of a cap, and you are unable to raise it, perhaps you can consider pagination at the 5MB threshold.

  360. Wade says:
    @Karl

    I watch virtually no television.

  361. Svigor says:

    Anonymous[364] • Disclaimer:

    Clicking a commenter’s handle-link will provide access to a complete archive of all comments under that handle, allowing other commenters to better judge the views of the individual in question. This mechanism allows commenters to gradually develop a “reputation,” which they would put at risk by ignorant or unfair comments.

    However, any commenter may also freely leave comments under the Anonymous/Anon handles, which are absolutely anonymous. But such totally anonymous comments may easily be misused for back-biting or malicious, unfair attacks on others, and should be taken much less seriously than comments that come “have a return address,” perhaps coming from individuals with established credibility.

    Shitbags like Nobody[364] don’t want you going back through their comment history and finding out how many anti-Christian comments they make, vs. how many anti-Jewish comments they make.

  362. geokat62 says:
    @Ron Unz

    I realize it takes some time digesting the fact that everything you know about a subject important to you is actually upside-down or backwards, but that happens to be the case.

    So, help me out here. You are seriously maintaining that whereas Johnson-Reed should be characterized as Open Borders, Hart-Cellar should be characterized as Restrictionist… not just in the sense of practical outcomes, but, more importantly, in terms of the intent of these respective pieces of legislation? Do I have that right, Ron?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  363. Ron Unz says:
    @geokat62

    So, help me out here. You are seriously maintaining that whereas Johnson-Reed should be characterized as Open Borders, Hart-Cellar should be characterized as Restrictionist… not just in the sense of practical outcomes, but, more importantly, in terms of the intent of these respective pieces of legislation? Do I have that right, Ron?

    Not at all. Everyone was focused on European immigration, so the 1924 Act was seen by everyone as Restrictionist and the 1965 Act as liberalizing. But with regard to Latin American immigration, the 1965 Act was the opposite.

    In fact, I remember reading somewhere that the limits on Latin American immigration in the 1965 Act were actually added by the *pro-Immigration* side as a very minor sop to the anti-Immigrationists, but nobody cared much one way or the other.

    Here’s the historical sequence:

    (1) Pre-1920s: Unlimited immigration from Europe, unlimited immigration from Latin America.

    (2) Post-1924: Strict quotas on Europe, unlimited immigration from Latin America.

    (3) Post-1965: Loosened quotas on Europe, new quotas on Latin America.

    • Replies: @phil
    , @geokat62
  364. geokat62 says:

    Here’s the historical sequence:

    Ok, that’s helpful.

    Having clarified these 3 phases of US immigration, I still maintain that it makes sense for America to retain it’s European identity and to do that it should immediately repeal Hart-Cellar. Rather than reinstating Johnson-Reed as is, however, perhaps an amendment could be introduced that restricts immigration from Latin America.

    Bottom Line: Do you agree with supporting an immigration policy whose intent is to preserve and protect the European-majority. And, if not, why not?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  365. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    https://forward.com/news/national/411355/revealed-canary-mission-blacklist-is-secretly-bankrolled-by-major-jewish/

    ADL is silent on the power money and ethnic angles – combination of which deny and refuse the basic rights to the campus activist

  366. Ron Unz says:
    @geokat62

    Bottom Line: Do you agree with supporting an immigration policy whose intent is to preserve and protect the European-majority. And, if not, why not?

    Actually, I don’t have particularly strong views one way or the other, and therefore regard various other factors as more important.

    If you want my views on this complex immigration subject, you’re really much better off reading my articles that I linked upthread since they can’t easily be summarized in a short comment.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @jilles dykstra
  367. Ron Unz says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    An improvement, but one still fails:

    Well, I squeezed another few percent from the HTML size, though this is about the effective limit of what I can easily do. Maybe that last remaining article will now load for you.

    The trouble with pagination is that it greatly complicates this system, especially given the forward/back popup views and links to other comments, and it extraordinarily unlikely we’ll get too many additional articles with 2000+ often very lengthy comments.

    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
  368. Jett Rucker says: • Website

    The three stages of the Establishment’s reaction to a paradigm-shifting new idea:

    1. Make fun of it.
    2. Ignore it.
    3. Say it’s obvious(ly true).

    I think Unz’s ideas have been promoted to Stage 2 above.

  369. Tyrion 2 says:

    1. Jews and blacks. Politically, they’re pretty much identical. Jews are like blacks with a 108 mean IQ. They vote the same, approach the world the same way, etc.

    Jewish SJWs overlap with Black SJWs. That’s correct. White WNs act like SJWs but on the other polarity. White SJWs do just as other SJWs do.

    2. Whites don’t follow Jews or blacks around. Whites don’t mind being excluded from Jewish or black spaces

    SJWs aren’t actually excluded from spaces. They just say they are. Much like the WNs here do as regards fantasy Jewish spaces.

    3. Jews and blacks go ape at mere mention of the notion of being excluded from White spaces.

    At least they don’t tend to make up a millenia old conspiracy and go ape about being excluded from that….

    4. Jews are the original dindunuffins. Centuries before blacks adopted the dindunuffin mantra, Jews had already been practicing the Jews dindunuffin mantra for centuries. Whites don’t do this.

    There is a venerable history of Jewish self-critique going back from the Old Testament to Jesus to Spinoza to the Jewish Reform thinkers of the Enlightenment to Jewish Communists to Haaretz, Mondoweiss and Unz.

    Even the foundation of the state of Israel was largely predicated on a Jewish self-critique. That of pathetic, uprooted diaspora Jews who didn’t work the land and were mewling in the face of oppression.

    You just don’t know this stuff because you’re very ignorant on this subject. I am too, which is why I only scratched the surface.

    Right wing” Jews always “revert” into leftists, once Jews become the topic. It’s too tedious to go into here in detail, but once you know to look for it, you can’t miss it. Try it the next time you hear a “right wing” Jew defending his tribe from right-wing crit. Itemize his “arguments” and look for how many are leftist arguments (that the same Jew was debunking five minutes ago when a black was using them).

    I will look for it. You know also this is what I am accusing you of?

    Anyway, I hope you enjoyed the proof that SJW feminism and Mein Kampf are remarkably similar!

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Svigor
    , @Svigor
    , @Svigor
  370. The ADL has not gone into hiding but has grown silent in the face of an awakening about Jewish deception of non Jews that is spreading everywhere for the first time since Germany. Other than to censor free speech everywhere, there is nothing the ADL can do to prevent the truth about Jewish lies and deception from spreading everywhere. This web site walks on the border between telling the truth and promoting blatant lies like 9-11 and the moon landing hoaxes as the truth. Still I come here to glean what truth I can.

  371. @Ron Unz

    The trouble with pagination is that it greatly complicates this system, especially given the forward/back popup views and links to other comments

    I understand the trouble with pagination having written a few front-end apps myself.

    Well, I squeezed another few percent from the HTML size, though this is about the effective limit of what I can easily do.

    Unfortunately, I still can’t load that final link. It is a pity that many people will be denied the opportunity to read that excellent post or many of the excellent comments.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  372. Ron Unz says:

    Unfortunately, I still can’t load that final link. It is a pity that many people will be denied the opportunity to read that excellent post or many of the excellent comments.

    That’s very irritating. Since I’m a pretty stubborn person, I think I’ll go back and see whether I can’t squeeze another few percent from the HTML. Since the 9/11 page started working for you with my last round of changes, I must be very, very close to getting the last one working as well.

    Meanwhile, I’m wondering whether anyone else has been having this load-problem with the Holocaust Denial page. It works fine for me, and people are still commenting on it, so it must be working for others as well.

    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
  373. Ron Unz says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    Unfortunately, I still can’t load that final link. It is a pity that many people will be denied the opportunity to read that excellent post or many of the excellent comments.

    Well, I went back and somehow figured out how to trim off another few percent of the HTML. Now the size is about what the 9/11 size was this morning, so I think it may finally work.

    Fortunately, very few additional comments are being added, so if it works it should stay working.

    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
  374. geokat62 says:
    @Ron Unz

    …you’re really much better off reading my articles that I linked upthread…

    Not sure I’d agree the first article sheds much light on your views on immigration. It was more of an assessment of various scenarios of political strategies the Republican Party could adopt – i.e., the Rove Strategy vs. the Sailer Strategy.

    Of much more interest was the second article, A “Grand Bargain” on Immigration Reform?

    Its thesis:

    Thus, these two powerful ideological coalitions [immigrant and anti-immigrant advocates] have fought each other to a complete stalemate, and each also views the current situation as totally unacceptable. But if they were to join forces, both might achieve their fondest goals while sacrificing relatively little in return…

    Only some sort of unexpected “grand bargain” crossing ideological lines might break the current political deadlock.

    In other words, the “grand bargain” could see the anti-immigrant advocates concede on amnesty as long as the immigrant advocates conceded on much reduced new immigration levels.

    As far as the following observation is concerned:

    Demographic changes so enormous and rapid on a continental scale are probably unprecedented in all human history, and our political establishment was remarkably blind for having failed to anticipate the possible popular reaction.

    I don’t know, Ron. I kind of see this as analogous to what is currently happening with the so-called I/P peace process. As this neverending peace process is stuck in infinite loop, the Israelis are busy gobbling up as much Palestinian land as they possibly can.

    The same applies to the immigration debate. I believe those that have been pushing the big lie that Diversity Is Our Strength are quite pleased to see both sides of this issue dig in their heals, while year after year non-white legal immigrants and illegal aliens continue to flood across the borders, ensuring the deplacement of the European majority.

    No, it’s too late for a grand bargain, Ron. As you rightly pointed out in your article:

    As a consequence of these sharply divergent demographic trends, American whites have fallen to little more than 60% of the total, and are now projected to become a minority within just another generation or two, already reduced to representing barely half of all children under the age of 10.

    No, I think Paul Krugman summed up where things are headed quite well:

    We are becoming more diverse, more multicultural and [white Europeans] are, in the end, they are not the future. In the end, the power they still have will go away. But, it’s a very difficult time until then. So, the future is Mayor de Blasio of New York. But Ted Cruz of Texas is still out there with the ability to do a lot of damage.

    That’s why I think it behooves those of us who wish to forestall this outcome to call for the immediate repeal of Hart-Cellar. Every day that goes by is a day in which another nail is driven into the heart of a European-majority. Unfortunately, your proposed compromise will simply not cut it.

  375. Macs says:

    Cass Sunstein’s paper on countering conspiracy theories lists ignoring them at the top. Any response can elicit the opposite effect of actually supporting the paranoia since obviously “that is exactly what conspirators would say.” I think your style and approach is especially apt to this since you take the topic in in such a straightforward manner and you have an earnestness in your writing. Naturally, should you Garner enough attention, other steps will be taken. Sunstein suggests infiltration, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the response is more dangerous when and if it comes. But I also don’t know your circles and how hard you would be to set-up, ect. Best of luck, keep it coming!

    • Replies: @Dan Hayes
    , @Ron Unz
  376. @Ron Unz

    Meanwhile, I’m wondering whether anyone else has been having this load-problem with the Holocaust Denial page. It works fine for me, and people are still commenting on it, so it must be working for others as well.

    Remember I am using a VPN with a European IP to access that page. If I turn off the VPN and use my normal San Francisco IP, the page loads.

  377. @Ron Unz

    Well, I went back and somehow figured out how to trim off another few percent of the HTML. Now the size is about what the 9/11 size was this morning, so I think it may finally work.

    Unfortunately, still not able to load that final link. Again, this is through the European VPN IP. Without it, it loads. It is also a possibility that there are other forces at work in Europe, e.g. selective blocking…

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  378. VeVePe says:

    There needs to be an effort to define what may be termed as the “Zionist Mafia”, understand their goals, and to devise strategies for dealing with them.

    It is simplistic to identify Zionism with the state of Israel. Israel is indeed an important base for the Zionist mafia, and also has a deep religious significance. But Zionism is a much larger concept. As Ben Gurion said:

    “In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah.”

    The Zionist Mafia includes not only Jews, but also crypto-Jews, part Jews, and huge numbers of brainwashed non-Jews, recruited through Freemasonry-like hierarchical secret societies, and through various front organizations ostensibly dedicated to various noble-sounding public causes.

    Having said that, it is always good to state that the vast majority of Jews are good human beings who have nothing to do with this Mafia. Three prominent examples being Israel Shamir, Gideon Levy, and Ron Unz himself.

    For Americans who want to regain their independence, the most urgent task is to ensure that there is a transparent paper trail for every voting machine. Tulsi Gabbard is one Congressperson who has actually tried get legislation passed for this. See her recent podcast with Joe Rogan. People need to support her more.

    • Agree: Wade
    • Replies: @Wade
  379. Dan Hayes says:
    @Macs

    Macs:

    Infiltration of the UR may not be a serious option since I have the impression that it is essentially a one-man operation in the person of its impresario Ron. (The only other individual listed on UR’s Masthead is its National Security Editor, Philip Giraldi.)

  380. @Ron Unz

    White America’s political response to illegal immigration from Mexico in 1954:

    Operation Wetback

  381. Ron Unz says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    Unfortunately, still not able to load that final link. Again, this is through the European VPN IP. Without it, it loads. It is also a possibility that there are other forces at work in Europe, e.g. selective blocking…

    Actually, here’s a useful test. This particular HTML Book page is even larger, but totally innocuous, so see if you can load it:

    http://www.unz.com/book/elbert_hubbard__little-journeys-to-the-homes-of-the-great/

    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
  382. Ron Unz says:
    @Macs

    Cass Sunstein’s paper on countering conspiracy theories lists ignoring them at the top.

    Exactly, and that’s almost certainly the main reason that the ADL and its MSM circle have been so silent. However, there’s a serious downside to this approach.

    If almost no one denounces and attacks these articles, they’re certainly not considered “radioactive” and gradually people recognize that reality and lose their fears, beginning to consider them in objective terms. And to the extent that they find them well-argued and a useful summary of the controversial topic, they begin to get quoted or even republished, especially since such a large fraction of other articles on that subject may be considered “radioactive.”

    For example, LewRockwell, one of the biggest libertarian websites just republished my 9/11 Conspiracy article in its Weekend edition, just about the first time they’ve ever published something in that area.

    Furthermore, Russia Insider, one of the biggest pro-Russia websites, just republished both the Holocaust Denial and 9/11 articles, along with this summary column, with the first two being among the most popular pieces they’re recently run.

    As a result, these articles have gathered tens of thousands of additional pageviews and gotten into circles that previously might not have encountered them. Which is an obvious downside of the ADL “Silent Treatment.”

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Wizard of Oz
  383. anarchyst says:
    @Svigor

    You are correct.
    Jews were at the forefront of the so-called “civil-rights” movement of the 1950s and 1960s. Blacks were too stupid to see that they were being “used” by their jewish handlers for nefarious purposes.
    Living through the civil-rights “struggles” (actually well-orchestrated violence), I observed for myself the shenanigans that the jewish civil-rights workers fomented.
    Violence was a part of the equation.
    We used to have a saying: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”.
    No truer words were spoken…

  384. AaronB says:

    While they seem to have finally noticed Ron, its a rather tepid and lukewarm condemnation. Almost a gentle rapping over the knuckles.

    They just don’t seem to really be taking this seriously.

    I wonder what direction future developments will take.

    • Replies: @Sean
  385. @Ron Unz

    There is nothing complex about immigration into the EU member states:
    Thilo Sarrazin, ‘Deutschland schafft sich ab, Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen’, München 2010
    The title ‘Germany destroys itself’.
    As the immigration goes on, Ockams Razor, the goal is the destruction of the cultures of the EU member states, so that these states, that hardly exist politically any more, also disappear culturally.
    See the Brussels hysterics against the E European states who refuse immigrants in order to remain as nations.
    The EU, it should be a USA clone.
    If it will succeed is another matter, more and more willingness at the left, open society, and the right, nationalism, to resort to violence.
    But is is possible to suspect that this is also what Brussels wants, being the Peacemaker, you know, the first Colt revolver.
    Timmermans already said ‘diversity, or war’.
    What war, why diversity, it is not explained.
    The now yearly, still just a battle of words, abour Black Pete, who appears on Dec 5, has begun already in the Netherlands.

  386. @Ron Unz

    Actually, here’s a useful test. This particular HTML Book page is even larger, but totally innocuous, so see if you can load it:

    Well that page loaded! So, something more than size is afoot here. Perhaps the ADL is not being as docile as you suggest and has a covert offensive launched under the covers…

  387. Sean says:
    @AaronB

    I think it is pretty clear that the ADL see and portray Ron as a Bobby Fischer type ( in every way), and while they are happy for him to cast doubt on the innocence of Dreyfus, they don’t want him touching the Leo Frank case.

    Dreyfus, an innocent Jewish artillery officer who, in a well-documented outburst of anti-Semitism in France, was put on trial for treason in 1894; and the anti-Semitic lynching in 1915 of Leo Frank, a Jewish businessman in Georgia who was convicted after a sham trial for the murder of a young girl who worked in his factory.

    Ron can wait, the the ADL have other priorities. They are aghast at the success of Trump accelerating as he seemed to ignore their very existence. The final Trump campaign ad:-

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-closing-campaign-ad-seen-as-striking-anti-semitic-tones/
    Donald Trump’s latest campaign ad, likely the final one wrapping up nearly a year of campaigning, contains content that has been criticized for having anti-Semitic overtones and implying a vast international Jewish conspiracy behind Hillary Clinton. The two-minute long ad features audio from Trump’s West Palm Beach speech in mid-October, which was criticized by the Anti-Defamation League for “rhetoric and tropes that historically have been used against Jews and still spur antisemitism.”
    Philanthropist investor George Soros, Federal Reserve head Janet Yellen and Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, all of whom are Jewish, appear onscreen as Trump inveighs against “levers of power in Washington” and “global special interests” — both considered anti-Semitic dog-whistles

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/as-anti-semitic-incidents-in-us-soar-adl-says-trump-is-part-of-the-problem/

    But

    https://thehill.com/opinion/international/406306-defunding-aid-for-palestinian-refugees-is-not-a-road-to-peace

    The ADL’s problem is that Trump is giving Israel everything it wants and then some. Trump is using the Israel Lobby against his own domestic Jewish opponents. He has the Kryptonite .

    • Replies: @AaronB
  388. AaronB says:
    @Sean

    I think the problem is that Ron went too far too fast.

    The way to challenge mainstream opinion is to cloak yourself in respectability – you agree with 90% of public opinion to gain credibility. That way they listen to you and think you’re basically one of them ( no one listens to an “outsider”). Then you challenge 10% of public opinion. And then again and again. You chip away.

    You can’t just go full hog right away.

    Another issue is that Ron appears a bit kooky by mainstream standards (not my standards), which renders him somewhat innocuous.

    The ADL will attack two types that represent an actual social threat – semi-respectable buttoned up types like Charles Murray or Jared Taylor, and symbolically evil types like neo-Nazis.

    In the end, who cares? Ron will have an effect in his own subtle way, it will percolate throughout the social chain, and it’s more interesting to just say what you think and boldly discuss your ideas without carefully crafting some strategy, which is tedious and best left to fanatics.

    I disagree with tons of whst Ron says about Jews and other topics, but I find him hilarious and fun, with a great website, so what the heck.

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @Ron Unz
  389. Ronnie says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    This is a good point. Brother Nathaniel was dissing the jews in public long ago and is a very perceptive critic. I have always enjoyed his videos. The usual Zionist irrationals do not seem to take him seriously. They act like no normal person would believe anything he says. Not true. He looks like an old rabbi so perhaps this protects him. Or maybe it is his cross? Or maybe it is the undiluted stark truth he speaks like Ron Unz.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  390. geokat62 says:

    From the ADL article linked, above:

    This is the latest step in Ron Unz’s quixotic trajectory as an education reformer, English-language advocate, failed candidate for US senate, anti-immigrant activist, and funder of anti-Israel and anti-immigrant websites.

    After reading the two articles you referred me to, I was surprised the ADL accused you of being anti-immigrant. What on earth are they talking about?

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Svigor
    , @Ron Unz
  391. UNZ readers may be interested in this recent commentary which explains in detail the terrible record and hypocrisy of the ADL:

    Link: http://www.armenianlife.com/2018/08/26/no-to-the-anti-defamation-league-in-glendale-and-elsewhere/

    It is titled “No to the Anti-Defamation League in Glendale and Elsewhere”, and is by the Armenian Americans for Human Rights organization, of which I am the Chair.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  392. geokat62 says:
    @David Boyajian

    UNZ readers may be interested in this recent commentary…

    “A Lobby is like a night flower. It thrives in the dark and dies in the sun.” – Steve Rosen #2 man at AIPAC

    Thank-you for sharing this commentary with Unz readers. I found the information under the heading “A very bad deal” of particular interest:

    Unfortunately — and contrary to the advice of Boston-area Armenian activists who had initiated and continued the 2007-8 campaign against the ADL — a small group of Armenians unwisely rushed in and in 2016 made a terrible deal with the ADL.
    The ill-advised deal resulted in ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt’s acknowledging — but only on the ADL website’s “blog” page — the Armenian Genocide and claiming that his organization “would support” (not “does support” or “will support”) an Armenian Genocide resolution in Congress.
    Only the ADL’s National Executive Committee and National Commission, however, not Greenblatt, can make official ADL policy. It’s unclear whether these two bodies have ever formally done so.
    Moreover, as the AAHR letter points out, the ADL has yet to publicly confirm that it actively supports the Armenian Genocide resolution. Indeed, the ADL has never fulfilled Armenian Americans’ original demand of 11 years ago — namely that as partial atonement for its reprehensible behavior the ADL must lobby as vigorously for an Armenian Genocide resolution as it has for Holocaust legislation.
    Even a former top ADL leader has called Greenblatt’s 2016 “blog” post “inadequate … assets, land … everything that Holocaust reparations … has represented should be on the table.”
    AAHR’s letter also notes that the ADL has never once apologized for its many wrongdoings against Armenians. Nor has the ADL explained, and opened its files regarding, its collusion with a foreign power — Turkey — to sway a U.S. Congressional vote. Thus the 2016 ADL deal made by a few Armenians was ill-conceived and unacceptable.

    The more sunlight, the better.

  393. Anon[146] • Disclaimer says:
    @geokat62

    Consider it as nothing more than a perceived, low cost chance for the ADL to link Far Right Zionism with the Leftist cause.

    Getting that paradoxical signal through, in low noise, was likely much more valuable to the ADL than rebuking Ron in a forceful sense.

    For the ADL, any chance to actively present nonsensical realities is a primary win, as this is what they are forced to traffic in.

  394. Tyrion 2 says:

    In order to discredit Ron’s writings the ADL needed only to summarise them; which is what they did. The sum total is so outlandish as to make David Icke look sensible.

    • Replies: @Sean
    , @Anon
  395. @Ronnie

    Years ago, in the early days of the World Wide Web, extended excerpts of Alfred Lilienthal’s works were online — his own website, if I recall correctly.

    Lilienthal’s life’s mission was opposition to zionism. The Introduction to his capstone work,
    “The Zionist Connection II: What Price Peace?”
    is accessible here: http://www.realnews247.com/the_zionist_connection_ii_what_price_peace_online_selections.htm

    Lilienthal’s books are not among Ron Unz’s extensive collection, perhaps because they are not that old, and copyrights have been renewed from 1978 until 2002. Perhaps next year the book will go out of copyright.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  396. Sean says:
    @AaronB

    The way to challenge mainstream opinion is to cloak yourself in respectability – you agree with 90% of public opinion to gain credibility. That way they listen to you and think you’re basically one of them ( no one listens to an “outsider”). Then you challenge 10% of public opinion. And then again and again. You chip away.

    By his own account he waited 15 years. Then he almost killed himself to bring it all out quickly Why everything now if not because his intent was to go slow, but Trump’s success forced Ron to cut to the chase?

    Another issue is that Ron appears a bit kooky by mainstream standards (not my standards), which renders him somewhat innocuous

    He cannot be called anti semetic because he is halachically Jewish. (so was Bobby Fischer). The ADL are probably reluctant to start calling Jews “self hating”, and like the rest of us are not sure what to make of Ron.

    In the end, who cares? Ron will have an effect in his own subtle way, it will percolate throughout the social chain, and it’s more interesting to just say what you think and boldly discuss your ideas without carefully crafting some strategy, which is tedious and best left to fanatics.

    Oh. I think he has some strategy in mind. But on the other hand his haircut, or rather the lack of one, makes me wonder if he really understands what is motivating him from the hidden depths.

  397. JackOH says:

    Chrissake, I’ve got to be the only dumbass who thinks Ron’s iconoclastic writings actually revitalize the view of Jews acting in concert with other Jews throughout history. Sometimes that action has Jews as perpetrators, sometimes as victims, and, mostly, of course, Jews are trying to make a living wherever they’re located, and just don’t have the time for that big-picture stuff.

    The ADL criticism seems to me very mild, sort of a bureaucrat-quality, ho-hum press release.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  398. geokat62 says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    The Introduction to his capstone work…

    Two killer quotes from his excellent intro:

    Rarely has the deceit of so few been so widely practiced to the disastrous detriment of so many, as in the formulation and implementation of U.S. Middle East policy. Guilt, fear, and the preoccupation with domestic politics rather than consideration of policy, justice, and security interests have molded the direction of the deep U.S. involvement…

    It is out of sadness, not anger, that I am forced to conclude that in embarking upon the new path that Organized Jewry has hewn for it, prophetic Judaism has incurred an incalculable loss in moral values, which author Moshe Menuhin has described as “the Decadence of Judaism in Our Times.” What else can account for the anomaly by which the once-persecuted have adopted the philosophy of their chief persecutor?

  399. phil says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron,

    You’re making some good points, but you skipped over the Bracero Program (1942-1964) and Operation Wetback (1954).

    The importation of farm labor was regulated.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  400. geokat62 says:
    @Ron Unz

    (3) Post-1965: Loosened quotas on Europe, new quotas on Latin America.

    I just realized that your characterization of the third phase of US immigration is not completely accurate.

    It should be revised to include a third segment of immigrants:

    (3) Post-1965: Loosened quotas on Europe, new quotas on Latin America, and allowed increased numbers of people to migrate to the United States from all over the world.

    • Agree: Ron Unz
  401. kiismerhe says:

    It was an extremely interesting series by an extremely brave author. One wonders though in retrospect if it should have been called “Jewish American Pravda”.

    Also, if there was anything left out? I could only think of the possible Jewish involvement in the starting of WWI and II and/or bringing the US into them.

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

  402. Sean says:
    @Tyrion 2

    I’m sorry, but as Ron says the “overwhelming likelihood” is that Leo Frank murdered little Mary Phagan. The ADL was founded in a fit of paranoia, or exists to defend Jews against accusations irrespective of whether they are guilty.

  403. TheJester says:

    My two cents: The ADL has not (yet) acted to destroy Ron Unz for fear that the thousands of very intelligent, highly educated commenters that frequent the Unz Review would scatter to a hundred other blogs and, from there, pick up the crusade against Jewish hegemony.

    From the ADL perspective, better to ignore a single source of anti-Jewish agitation in one place than try to track down the remnants bringing sound logic and reason to the subject on a hundred different platforms. It’s called containment.

  404. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Jewish SJWs overlap with Black SJWs. That’s correct. White WNs act like SJWs but on the other polarity. White SJWs do just as other SJWs do.

    :Jewish SJWs” and “Black SJWs” are unlike White SJWs because SJWs are actually traitors to their race, ethnically self-abnegating Uncle Toms. Jewish SJWs and Black SJWs are not, don’t talk shit about Jews or Blacks (respectively), don’t blame them for anything, and both support their respective collective ethnonationalistic endeavors; e.g., organized Jewry and Zionism for Jews, gibsmedat coalition for Blacks. White SJWs don’t do anything equivalent. If White SJWs advocated for more gibs or an ethnostate for Whites, if other White SJWs didn’t kill them, Jewish or Black SJWs would.

    Just look at organized Jewry; it’s not “deconstruct ourselves, deconstruct the Jews,” it’s “deconstruct Whitey.” That’s not Uncle Tommery or ethnic self-abnegation, it’s ethnonationalistic hostility.

    But this whole “SJW” construction is disingenuous. Jews voted 75% against Trump (pretty much a monolithic “leftist” bloc, just like Blacks). It’s not really SJWism, so much as the overwhelming Jewish majority. So this leftist thing you’re doing where “you know a bad one” is silly, because it ignores rates, as leftists are wont to do.

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Tyrion 2
  405. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    SJWs aren’t actually excluded from spaces. They just say they are. Much like the WNs here do as regards fantasy Jewish spaces.

    It’s almost like you aren’t smart enough for the job you’ve taken on. Jews go ape when whites give any indication of even contemplating having for themselves what Jews have for themselves in Israel. WNs don’t want to live in Israel. They want Jews off their back and out of their polities. They want the right to live apart from Jews. Jews go ape at the idea of any 1st world White population living apart from them, unless it’s by dint of the fact that Jews are keeping them out, as in Israel.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  406. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    At least they don’t tend to make up a millenia old conspiracy and go ape about being excluded from that….

    This makes no sense. But you constructed it in the form of “I’m rubber and you’re glue,” so, kudos, I guess.

  407. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    There is a venerable history of Jewish self-critique going back from the Old Testament to Jesus to Spinoza to the Jewish Reform thinkers of the Enlightenment to Jewish Communists to Haaretz, Mondoweiss and Unz.

    Even the foundation of the state of Israel was largely predicated on a Jewish self-critique. That of pathetic, uprooted diaspora Jews who didn’t work the land and were mewling in the face of oppression.

    You just don’t know this stuff because you’re very ignorant on this subject. I am too, which is why I only scratched the surface.

    It always takes on the form of a kind of humblebrag, though. “Ve vere veak in da face of de oppressive, monstrous goyim!” That’s not a critique of Jews. It’s anti-goy hate.\

    You’re one of those Jews who’s simply incapable of altering your POV. Don’t worry, the vast majority of your tribe has the same congenital defect. It’s sort of tautological; if you didn’t, you wouldn’t be Jews. Your open-minded, insufficiently-ethnocentric ancestors would’ve assimilated.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    , @APilgrim
  408. Svigor says:
    @Svigor

    I mean, this is how dopey Jew “logic” gets when they start their reflexive Jews dindunuffin routine:

    Jew: “I hate whites.”
    White: “I hate whites.”
    Tyrion: “see? They’re the same, goy!”

    No, Jew, they’re not the same. They’re very different. One is betraying his tribe (and is probably too ignorant to know the Jew isn’t in that tribe). The other is attacking another tribe.

    Part Deux:

    Jew: “down with white ethnonationalism! Open borders for the west!”
    White: “down with white ethnonationalism! Open borders for Israel!”
    Jew (strangling White): “ANTISEMITE!!!”

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  409. Svigor says:
    @geokat62

    It’s just a thing Jews do. If they don’t like an enemy’s position, they replace it with one they do.

  410. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    If you want a safe space from your imagined Jewish conspiracy, try reality.

    • Replies: @Anon
  411. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    But this whole “SJW” construction is disingenuous. Jews voted 75% against Trump

    No doubt exactly the same as other whites living in the same places and of the same level of education.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  412. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    There’s so many articles celebrating Kissinger as the first POC Secretary of State, Schumer as the first POC Senate party leader and all those POC Oscar winners like Dustin Hoffman, Daniel Day-Lewis and Stanley Kubrick.

    Oh, no, Svigor doesn’t care for logic. All he wants to do is flung his own faeces at the walls and scream anti-Jewish insults.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  413. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    I gave you an avalanche of evidence. None if which you dismissed; instead you doubled down, so you said that I “am incapable of changing my POV”!

    Svigor, don’t broadcast your mental insufficiencies so easily.

    As my father told me “the difference between the wise man and the fool is that the wise man knows when to shut up”.

  414. APilgrim says:

    The ADL, HIAS, NYTimes, Soros, ACLU, & Jewish Politicians went aggressive against conservative Christianity as well as conservative Christian spokesmen & leaders. These Jews and substantially Jewish groups, actively undermined Western Civilization and their own safety, with ‘Open-Borders’ and sponsorship of mass Muhammadan immigration to Europe and the Americas.

    Robert Borq, Clarence Thomas, Sarah Palin, Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh committed the singular offense of being Christian Conservative leaders. Their faith and opposition to Globalisives, Progressives, Anarchists, & Totalitarianism, together with their religious faith have subjected them to unparalleled defamation and personal attacks, in the public forums.

    These ongoing scurrilous attacks on all things Christian and Conservative, have certainly engendered a substantial, personal, hostility toward many Jewish leaders and causes. The tendency of American Jews to serve in the IDF, to the exclusion of US Armed Forces, and the widespread dual citizenship in the USA and Israel is also deeply troubling. Jewish opposition to classic ‘Sound Public Policy’ has also taken a toll.

    The ADL is hiding, because the ADL has poisoned the well.

  415. APilgrim says:
    @Svigor

    “There is a venerable history of Jewish self-critique going back from the Old Testament to Jesus to Spinoza to the Jewish Reform thinkers of the Enlightenment to Jewish Communists to Haaretz, Mondoweiss and Unz.”

    Svigor left out Josephus, author of ‘The Antiquities of the Jews’ and ‘The Wars of the Jews’.

    Titus Flavius Josephus, born Yosef ben Matityahu, (born ad 37/38, Jerusalem—died ad 100, Rome) was a first-century Romano-Jewish scholar, historian and hagiographer, who was born in Jerusalem—then part of Roman Judea—to a father of priestly descent and a mother who claimed royal ancestry.

    Josephus is widely considered by Jews to be their greatest traitor and greatest historian.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  416. APilgrim says:

    “There is a venerable history of Jewish self-critique going back from the Old Testament to Jesus to ‘Saul of Tarsus’ to Josephus to Spinoza to the Jewish Reform thinkers of the Enlightenment to Jewish Communists to Haaretz, Mondoweiss and Unz.”

  417. APilgrim says:

    Dear Ron Unz, You are God Damn STRAIGHT,

    MODERN Jewish stridency against Christians & Conservatives is exponentially increasing hostility to Ashkenazim, Sephardim, Mizrahim and Ethiopian Jews. I am infuriated enough over ONGOING Jewish defamation of:

    Robert Borq, Clarence Thomas, Sarah Palin, Donald Trump, Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh

    To personally load: George Soros, Chuck Schumer, Dianne Feinstein, & Richard Blumenthal into cattle cars destined for the Auschwitz Concentration Camp.

  418. Ron Unz says:
    @geokat62

    After reading the two articles you referred me to, I was surprised the ADL accused you of being anti-immigrant. What on earth are they talking about?

    Yes, they just got their facts on that particular issue totally garbled, presumably by reading that claim somewhere else.

    Also, their lazy ideological mindset is “Sharply criticizing Jewish behavior = Ultra-rightwing = Anti-immigrant.”

  419. Svigor says:
    @APilgrim

    Yeah, Josephus was, IIRC, a Hellenized Jew who didn’t care too much for the Zealot type Jews.

  420. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    This is a zero-calorie dodge. You can make up any excuse you like for why Jews are enemies of the White race, doesn’t affect the facts of the matter at all. Like I care why Jews are trying to destroy me.

    It’s like when people say “Jews are over-represented in the anti-white elite because merit.” Great, thanks for that calorie-free take on the heavily Jewish nature of the elite I want overthrown.

    And again, “right-wing” Jew suddenly ignores rates (as leftists are wont to do), when the topic turns to Jews. And again, White leftists and Jewish “leftists” aren’t the same:

    Jew: “I hate whites.”
    White: “I hate whites.”
    Tyrion: “see? They’re the same, goy!”

    No, Jew, they’re not the same. They’re very different. One is betraying his tribe (and is probably too ignorant to know the Jew isn’t in that tribe). The other is attacking another tribe.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  421. Ron Unz says:
    @JackOH

    The ADL criticism seems to me very mild, sort of a bureaucrat-quality, ho-hum press release.

    Yes, now that I finally provoked the ADL into responding to my recent series, I thought their summary of the positions presented in my articles was actually reasonably accurate though obviously provided with a sharply critical spin. My main disappointment was that they failed to provide links to the individual articles…for obvious reasons. But obviously anyone whose curiosity is piqued by the ADL piece can surely locate them via Google.

    Amusingly enough, my other complaint is that they actually *excluded* mention of some of my most controversial material, especially with regards to the JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks. This must surely be one of the first times the ADL has *failed* to denounce someone they attacked as being a “conspiracy theorist” when they could have so easily done so.

    I also found it amusing that in some respects their attacks on the “anti-Semitism” of the late Prof. Israel Shahak were considerably harsher than what they said about me. Given that Shahak was a long-time and highly-regarded Israeli academic, whose works were fulsomely praised by prominent public intellectuals such as Noam Chomsky, Edward Said, Gore Vidal, and Christopher Hitchens, I’m not sure an unsigned column by the ADL is really so dispositive.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Tyrion 2
    , @utu
    , @JackOH
  422. Svigor says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Do you suppose you’re making some point with that POC Jew this, POC Jew that bit? Because I don’t know what it is.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  423. geokat62 says:
    @Ron Unz

    Amusingly enough, my other complaint is that they actually *excluded* mention of some of my most controversial material, especially with regards to the JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks.

    Amusing, indeed. I think that omission is very telling.

  424. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    You wouldn’t. You’re so unselfaware I doubt you’d pass the (recognise yourself in) the mirror test.

  425. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Ron Unz

    Yeah, they’re scared of your looney tunes…it isn’t that you’ve sung so many that they lacked the will to list them all.

  426. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Svigor

    Even if your wet dreams came true and all Jews were tortured to death, you’d still be in exactly the same political position. Actually, you might be a bit more pro-Muslim immigration…

    Yay, for you!

    • Replies: @Anon
  427. utu says:
    @Ron Unz

    What seems to be new in this ADL write up is that Israel Shahak was promoted from the self-hating Jew position to a full Anti-Semite or rather demoted from a Jew to mere goy. It is possible that you, Mr. Unz, will be demoted to mere goy as well. So just as well you may get yourself a Christmas tree this year and develop taste for white bread bologna sandwiches.

    Shanda fur di Goyim!

    http://www.doronkornbluth.com/articles.asp?AID=25#.W7qj3C3MzzU

    As if Bernie Madoff wasn’t enough. And as if Jack Abramowitz wasn’t enough. And as if riots in Jerusalem weren’t enough. Now we have a group of very religious looking Jews being handcuffed by the FBI in a massive fraud case that has brought down three mayors and scores of lawmakers and politicos in New Jersey.

    The Yiddish phrase “Shanda fur di goyim” refers to (Jewish) embarrassment at a fellow Jew doing something Really Bad in front of non-Jews. In other words, don’t wash your dirty linen in public. Do we have problems? Of course. There have always been problems. But, the phrase suggests, be careful: the world tends to look at “the Jews” as one people and what one Jew does reflects well – or badly – on the rest of us. According to this idea, doing something bad is bad enough, but it becomes much worse when it reflects badly on the entire Jewish people.

  428. KDM says:
    @Svigor

    It seems to me there is a Jewish Left & a Jewish Right w/ a Jewish middle as well. I’m not agreeing or disagreeing with your argument with Tyrion but I don’t like being collectivized as a generic “white person” by the SJW left. Is it possible to just call out the Jewish Left on these issues without conflating the J Right? It seems to me that the Right has some Jews who don’t want mass immigration and actually really like the constitution and not just for Israel. I’m not Jewish (I’m a generic white American of/ Irish, English and Native American descent raised nominally Protestant) but I’ve read a lot of the history and a lot of current Jewish writers, they are always abundant in anything intellectual, I really don’t think the conservative American Jews (not the Max Boot neocon variety) are trying to subvert America. It seems like they really love the U.S.

    However, I get what you’re saying about Europe as in specifically George Soros, who is also trying to subvert Israel as well and Barbara Lerner Spectre on Jews taking the leading roll in multicultural Europe. If I were a Jew I would disavow that lady pronto! She’s not only helping to spread antisemitism but also anti americanism. No one wants their society to be socially engineered by some foreigner.

    • Replies: @Anon
  429. Anon[298] • Disclaimer says:
    @KDM

    No.

    “White” is a racial category with no specific ideology attached, aside from natural human group survival instincts, if one controls for the Whites who had had their mind’s co-opted away from those natural instincts by Far Left anti-White propaganda.

    Most Leftist Whites have not thought through the eventual result of their politics: the eradication of all White people aside from the occasional genetic anomaly (survivor). If they would be forced to think through and confront this eventual result, many would change their political orientation. Most people operate on emotion rather than true analysis.

    In contrast, “Jewish” is both a racial and ideological category. To identify as a Jew is to cosign a belief in the defining event of Judaism: the Jewish messianic age.

    If one believes in the eventuality and desirability of the Jewish messianic age, whether “Left”, “Right”, or “Center”, then that Jew believes in most/all of the things that the gentile Right is hostile to and warning against: widespread denationalization and miscagenation except for Jews, worldwide Jewish judicial control, and a de facto slave status for non-Jews.

    Max Boot and the rest of the Neocons want to “subvert” America. This is more than obvious through his support of cultural Marxist policies (supporting such Marxism directly or indirectly) and his anti-nationalist rhetoric, which he would never support for Israel. He is the worst type of hostile Jew, because he makes an attempt to seem to be other than what he is to gentiles who truly don’t know any better.

    Jews are never going to disavow Lerner Spectre. She is not saying anything different than what their mainstream political apparatus believes and wants. She is merely advancing Judaism, as Judaism. Why would they disavow?

    With all due respect, you seem to be relatively new to these politics. You’ll catch up, though I don’t envy your road.

  430. Anon[263] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    That’s untrue. Jews are the only thing keeping other minorities alive in the West. There is no possibility of their successful self defense, in any arena, without Jews. The natural impulse of Whites is to defend their genetic pool against southern DNA. That defense is what made us.

    If Jews were to disappear, or I strongly suspect if they ever all get successfully recalled to Israel by choice or by force (this return being the certain reality over the former suggestion), the removal of all minorities is the exact outcome that you will witness. Mark my words.

    The return of Jews to Israel will mark the beginning of the end of multiculturalism. This symbolism is inherent in the Jewish-Christian religions.

    There is no other true political competition, aside from Jews. There is no true morality keeping minorities present here, aside from that which was invented by Judaism. The dissemination of Jews in “the nations” is the central spiritual symbol of multiculturalism (for lack of a better term). Their withdrawal will mark the end of multiculturalism’s possibility.

    • LOL: Tyrion 2
  431. Anon[239] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Is the Jewish messianic age, which is the central belief and goal of Judaism, an imagined conspiracy?

    I don’t think so.

    When Jews wish for an age where everyone else is a de facto slave, their is no “anti-Judaism”. There is only pro-humanity and self-defense.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  432. Anon[365] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Your circuitous reasoning is truly worthy of your education, and is reflective of your laziness.

    There aren’t any statements, which exist and aren’t self-referential and self-nullifying, which are discredited by their mere existence.

    Every statement requires rebuttal in some forum. Ron’s articles more so than usual, since they are reflective of a wide and deep worldwide outcry on the issues that he addresses. The lack of mainstream address of such, under no obvious manipulation and oppression, looking like oppression.

    The ADL’s conflicting primary moral positions render it constitutionally and credibly unable to discredit anything.

    The ADL simultaneously advocates for social Marxism for everyone else, but nationalism for Jews.

    This type of non-universal ethical position is antithetical to Western ethics in general, and thus it deprives them of a credible moral platform. Which, today, is all that matters. So, the ADL has no legitimate / effective platform to critique anyone else.

    At this point, the ADL is more than likely to have a strong opposite political effect in regard to anything that it critiques or endorses. That’s the general effect of the actions of explicitly unethical organizations in today’s society.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  433. Ron Unz says:
    @phil

    You’re making some good points, but you skipped over the Bracero Program (1942-1964) and Operation Wetback (1954).

    The importation of farm labor was regulated.

    Yes, that’s entirely correct. As I recall, the private *recruitment* of foreign labor from Mexico and other countries was prohibited, so immigrants normally had to decide to cross the border on their own. It’s been a dozen years, but I think the immigration fee was something like $20 and immigrants also had to wait a day or two to be officially processed.

    But since nobody much cared about the border and Mexican immigrants were poor and impatient, they often avoided the $20 fee and the delay by just crossing illegally. Therefore, every now and then, the US government would round up and deport hundreds of thousands of those illegals.

    However, suppose the 1965 Immigration Act hadn’t passed, and unlimited numbers of Latin Americans could *legally* immigrate to the US by paying $20 and waiting a couple of days. Wouldn’t you think that immigration would have been something like 5 million per year rather than just a tenth of that?

    Obviously, you and your friends could lobby Congress to raise the fee to something much higher but with all the business groups lobbying on the other side. Do you think you would have won that battle and overcome a filibuster?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  434. geokat62 says:
    @Ron Unz

    However, suppose the 1965 Immigration Act hadn’t passed, and unlimited numbers of Latin Americans could *legally* immigrate to the US by paying $20 and waiting a couple of days. Wouldn’t you think that immigration would have been something like 5 million per year rather than just a tenth of that?

    Ron, when I wrote the purpose of the 1924 Immigration Act was “to preserve the ideal of American homogeneity.”

    You responded, “Sure, that’s all true…”

    You now contend:

    Do you think you would have won that battle and overcome a filibuster?

    If the purpose of Johnson-Reed was, indeed, to preserve the ideal of American homogeneity, do you really believe the representatives of the European-majority of that time would have allowed 5 million Mexicans to cross the border every year? By allowing this level of Mexican immigration into the US, you don’t think it may have occurred to those same representatives that they may have been encouraging the Reconqista of the lands America had conquered from Mexico a century earlier through war?

  435. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Anon

    What on earth are you talking about?

    They shall beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks; nation will not lift sword against nation and they will no longer study warfare.

    — Isaiah 2:4

  436. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Anon

    There aren’t any statements, which exist and aren’t self-referential and self-nullifying, which are discredited by their mere existence.

    If I said that I was the best singer I knew, that would credible. If I added that I was also the best writer, I’d start to sound odd.

    If I then went on and on and on about how I was the best fighter, lover, cook, swimmer, artist, driver, physicist, surgeon etc etc etc that I knew, then I’d be self-discrediting. I’d be an obvious loon.

    Ron’s list of all of the evil of Jews is so extraordinary that it self-discredits. No humans are like that. Even shapeshifting lizards couldn’t be that bad.

    Whether he has Daddy issues like Ariel Toaffe, has had a minor psychotic break or just feels lonely and this is a sick game, I don’t know. Maybe it is all three…maybe he just finds it amusing that he has so easily outcompeted all previous anti-Semitic sites written in English and now holds a de facto monopoly…

    Nonetheless if you list even half of Ron’s accusations, as the ADL did, with all of the filler subtracted, you are left with an utterly self-discrediting rant.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @jacques sheete
  437. APilgrim says:

    Blacks & Jew political leaders, despite their vast IQ differences, have gone FULL SOCIALIST & GLOBALIST. There is clearly a shared hatred for The Republic and all things American. This hatred is manifested against the Christian (Evangelical) Right and the constitutional rule of law. Symbols of the American Republic, such as our Flag and National Anthem are openly mocked by Blacks on the sports field, and Jews in the halls of power.

    The pagan political liturgy of ‘leader Jews and follower Blacks’, embraces orgies and abortions. This is somewhat similar to the forbidden ancient Hebrew worship of Baal and Molloch. Baal was the fertility god, while Moloch required infant sacrifice.

    Everything old is new again.

  438. APilgrim says:

    The most extreme Jewish hatred is directed against Male, Caucasian, Evangelical, Christian Leaders.

    Sarah Palin, Clarence Thomas, and Robert Borq each lacked one of the hated traits. Brett Kavanaugh is a Male, Caucasian, Evangelical, Christian Leader.

    And the Jews are howling for his blood.

  439. JackOH says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron, thanks.

    You have your critics, Ron, but as I mentioned, dumbass that I may be, I’m seeing Jews restored as vital players in history. Sometimes they’re Jews acting in concert with other Jews to pursue interests that are seen as distinctly Jewish, or Zionist. This doesn’t bust me up, and I think it would have been common knowledge among reasonably educated people of a century ago.

    People ought to consider the alternative, that the free pass given to “victimization” and “perpetrator” ideologies promoted by the ADL, SPLC, Urban League, and all those other advocacy groups turns people into dehumanized and manipulable stick figures, Gumby and Pokey characters maybe, for the convenience of debate and ease of policy-making. That seems to me a real problem.

  440. APilgrim says:

    Ten (10) Jewish Members of the US Senate hold Dual Citizenship in Israel, which long was, and should again be disqualifying, to hold political office, on the basis of divided loyalty.

    Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Benjamin Cardin (D-MD), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Carl Levin (D-MI), Bernie Sanders (Independent-VT), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Michael Bennet (D-CO). Recent senators with Dual Citizenship, include Barbara Boxer, Joe Lieberman & Al Franken.

    I am sick and God Damned TIRED of this Open Betrayal of America.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  441. APilgrim says:

    Dual-citizenship, should be an automatic disqualifier to political office, voting, or jury service.

    Most particularly for Mexico & Israel.

    Pick a country, or we shall kick your disloyal ass out of this American Nation.

  442. APilgrim says:

    Reportedly, the Israel rules for members of their parliament/legislature/Knesset.

    15. (a) A Knesset member shall make a declaration of allegiance as follows: “I pledge myself to bear allegiance to the State of Israel and faithfully to discharge my mandate in the Knesset.” (b) Arrangements for the declarations shall be set by law.

    16. If the speaker of the Knesset has called upon its members to make their declarations of allegiance and a member has not done so, that member shall not enjoy the rights of membership as long as he has not made the declaration.

    16A. If a Knesset member holds an additional, non-Israeli citizenship, and the laws of the country whose citizenship he holds permit him to be released from such citizenship, he shall not declare allegiance until after he has done everything required on his part to be released from such citizenship, and he shall not enjoy the rights of a Knesset member until he makes his declaration.

  443. geokat62 says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Ron’s list of all of the evil of Jews is so extraordinary that it self-discredits. No humans are like that. Even shapeshifting lizards couldn’t be that bad.

    Extraordinary, really? Your fallacious argument would suggest that serial killers do not exist – i.e., that “no humans are like that.”

    How long is this list of crimes that Ron is attributing to Jews?

    In a list of serial killers with the highest known victim count, the “most prolific modern serial killer is Harold Shipman, with 218 proven kills and possibly as many as 250”:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_killers_by_number_of_victims

    So compared to Shipman, the list of evils Ron has attributed to Jews is relatively small.

    • Disagree: Tyrion 2
  444. APilgrim says:

    [Too many off-topic comments. Change this if you want your comments published.]

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  445. APilgrim says:

    The ADL (Anti Defamation League) has been replaced by the Jewish Attack Brigade (JAB).

    The JAB mission is to DESTROY:

    JAB despises Conservative Caucasian Evangelicals, Borq, Thomas, Palin, Moore & Kavanaugh.
    JAB undermines border security & immigration control.
    JAB replaces the presumption of innocence with scurrilous accusations.
    JAB renounces American citizenship duties, in favor of military service to Israel.
    JAB attacks every clause of the Constitution of the United States.
    JAB robs the national treasury, to bail out speculators.

    JAB is financed by Atheist Jew George Soros.

  446. APilgrim says:
    @APilgrim

    Perhaps the moderator will discuss wherein particular comments appear to be ‘off-topic’.

    IMHPO, American Jewish Political Leaders have renounced ‘Anti-Defamation’ in favor of scurrilous attacks on Caucasian, Male, Conservative, Patriotic, Evangelical Leaders. Brett Kavanaugh is a ‘Perfect Storm’, because he is ALL of those things, as is Judge Roy Moore. Borq, Thomas, Palin, and Trump each lacked at least one of the DESPISED characteristics.

    Or perhaps my discussion of the INHERENTLY DISLOYAL practice of Jewish political leaders holding Dual Citizenship, is considered ‘Off Topic’.

    Are these two contemporary Jewish behaviors giving RISE to justified attacks, on the perps? I rather think so. Perhaps others may disagree with my recitation of these facts, or the conclusions which I draw from those facts.

    • Replies: @Koseki
  447. JackOH says:

    OT: The last 24 hours I’ve noticed new comments under some posts without the usual “17 new“, for example, in bold. I only saw an article with, say, “81 comments” early in the morning, then “112 comments” late in the afternoon, without the “31 new” in bold. I didn’t keep track of the articles. Just thought it worth a quick mention. Everything else seemed okay.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  448. Wade says:
    @VeVePe

    The Zionist Mafia includes not only Jews, but also crypto-Jews, part Jews, and huge numbers of brainwashed non-Jews, recruited through Freemasonry-like hierarchical secret societies, and through various front organizations ostensibly dedicated to various noble-sounding public causes.

    Having said that, it is always good to state that the vast majority of Jews are good human beings who have nothing to do with this Mafia. Three prominent examples being Israel Shamir, Gideon Levy, and Ron Unz himself.

    This seems like a pretty good assessment.

  449. Ron Unz says:
    @JackOH

    OT: The last 24 hours I’ve noticed new comments under some posts without the usual “17 new“, for example, in bold. I only saw an article with, say, “81 comments” early in the morning, then “112 comments” late in the afternoon, without the “31 new” in bold. I didn’t keep track of the articles. Just thought it worth a quick mention. Everything else seemed okay.

    I did make a few small changes in the code in the last couple of days, but those were unlikely to have broken that feature, and it seems to be working fine on my computers.

    The “New” count relies upon the storage of a local cookie, and maybe your particular cookie somehow got deleted.

  450. Koseki says:
    @APilgrim

    …Brett Kavanaugh is a ‘Perfect Storm’, because he is ALL of those things

    He’s not Evangelical. He’s traditional Roman Catholic.

    But that’s worse, right? Evangelicals are fairly modern; authentic RC are anti-abortion AND anti-birth control AND anti-feminist AND hierarchical. Ouch…he gotta go :-).

    But this seems to merely be about preventing Conservatives from getting their turn with SCOTUS with a little the MeToo mixed in. I can’t see the Jewish connection here (it’s not like Mel Gibson or anything). But I’m willing to be corrected.

  451. Ron Unz says:
    @AaronB

    The way to challenge mainstream opinion is to cloak yourself in respectability – you agree with 90% of public opinion to gain credibility. That way they listen to you and think you’re basically one of them ( no one listens to an “outsider”). Then you challenge 10% of public opinion. And then again and again. You chip away.

    Actually, I don’t think that’s correct, for two unrelated reasons.

    First, a pattern of behavior is a powerful analytical tool. Suppose one suggests that the MSM account of some particular Jewish issue is massively in error. Well, most people would say that seems quite unlikely. But suppose that the same pattern of error or bias is demonstrated in 47 separate cases. At that point, the pattern becomes quite convincing.

    When I read in my morning papers that some unknown woman had accused Bill Cosby of raping her, I dismissed it as implausible. But when 73 separate women came forward with the same accusation, I immediately assumed that he was guilty.

    The other issue is indicated by a famous anecdote in Michael Lewis’s Liars Poker, about the Salomon trading desk. Their top trader used to play a simple gambling game with his colleagues, and one day, the Salomon CEO came by and decided to put him in his place by challenging him to play a single hand for $1M. The trader agreed, but only if they played for $10M. The CEO wasn’t worried about losing $1M, but $10M was very serious money to him, so he declined and walked away.

    Suppose I had written a column raising only on one or two of the issues so “touchy” to the ADL and similar groups. They might well have ferociously attacked me, thinking they would probably win, but in any event, there was little downside risk. But by the time they began considering their reaction, I had already published a series of articles raising 30 or 40 of their “touchy” issues, so if they chose to sharply attack me and thereby raise the profile of my writings, they might risk very serious damage indeed.

    Thus, they stayed far away until I finally provoked them into doing something, and even then their critique was rather perfunctory and they apparently made little attempt organize a broader media attack.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  452. Christo says:

    Lord that Greenblatt character is one sick looking fish faced evil freak.

    Anyway , no the ADL is just doing stuff more covertly like getting the “Charlotteville 5 ” thrown in jail. And are working on getting anyone who showed up there for white people thrown in jail. And they will continued to do this for future demonstrations , as the police agencies of the US are acting hand in h]and with them . Or more like being lead by the nose.

  453. Ahoy says:

    The ADL hasn’t gone into hiding. There are in a convention to create some new slogans, because the ones in current use are kind of old.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=uW3a1bw5XlE&ab_channel=91177info

  454. geokat62 says:

    The ADL’s Center on Extremism has just released their latest report on how the Alt-Right is driving the resurgence of white supremacy.

    As I’ve repeatedly pointed out, rather than ceasing and desisting from engaging in their nefarious activities, The Lobby is doubling down. Rather than admitting they are responsible for creating this backlash by relentlessly pushing for a non-restrictionist immigration policy that would inevitably lead to the displacement of the European-majority, these Jewish supremacists have the Chutzpah to blame their victims of the policies they plumped for, by portraying them as as a bunch of losers, a fringe group of skin heads or KKKers.

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY of New Hate and Old: The Changing Face of American White Supremacy:

    [MORE]

    White supremacists in the United States have experienced a resurgence in the past three years, driven in large part by the rise of the alt right.

    The white supremacist “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, on August 11-12, 2017, attracted some 600 extremists from around the country and ended in deadly violence. These shocking events served as a wake-up call for many Americans about a resurgent white supremacist movement in the United States.

    Modern white supremacist ideology is centered on the assertion that the white race is in danger of extinction, drowned by a rising tide of non-white people who are controlled and manipulated by Jews. White supremacists believe that almost any action is justified if it will help “save” the white race.

    The white supremacist resurgence is driven in large part by the rise of the alt right, the newest segment of the white supremacist movement. Youth-oriented and overwhelmingly male, the alt right has provided new energy to the movement, but has also been a destabilizing force, much as racist skinheads were to the movement in the 1980s and early 1990s.

    The alt right has a white supremacist ideology heavily influenced by a number of sources, including paleoconservatism, neo-Nazism and fascism, identitarianism, renegade conservatives and right-wing conspiracy theorists. The alt right also possesses its own distinct subculture, derived especially from the misogynists of the so-called “manosphere” and from online discussion forums such as 4chan, 8chan and Reddit.

    Though aspects of the alt right date back to 2008, it was Donald Trump’s entry in 2015 into the 2016 presidential race that really energized the alt right and caused it to become highly active in support of Trump. This activism drew media attention that provided publicity for the alt right and allowed it to grow further. The alt right interpreted Trump’s success at the polls in November 2016 as a success for their own movement as well.

    After the election, the alt right moved from online activism into the real world, forming real-world groups and organizations and engaging in tactics such as targeting college campuses. The alt right also expanded its online propaganda efforts, especially through podcasting.

    As the alt right received increased media scrutiny—in large part due to its own actions, such as the violence at Charlottesville—the alt right experienced dissension and disunity in its own right, including the departure of many extremists who did not advocate explicit white supremacy (the so-called “alt lite”). The backlash against the alt right after Charlottesville hurt many of its leading spokespeople but has not resulted, as some have claimed, in a decline in the movement as a whole.

    Other white supremacists—neo-Nazis, traditional white supremacists, racist skinheads, white supremacist religious sects, and white supremacist prison gangs—have also continued their activities. Some white supremacists, such as neo-Nazis, seem to have been buoyed by the alt right to some extent, while others— most notably racist skinheads—may experience a loss of potential recruits at the hands of the alt right.

    Violence and crime represent the most serious problems emanating from the white supremacist movement. White supremacists have killed more people in recent years than any other type of domestic extremist (54% of all domestic extremist-related murders in the past 10 years). They are also a troubling source of domestic terror incidents (including 13 plots or attacks within the past five years).

    Murders and terror plots represent only the tip of the iceberg of white supremacist violence, as there are many more incidents involving less serious crimes, including attempted murders, assaults, weapons and explosives violations, and more. In addition, white supremacists engage in a lot of non-ideological crime, including crimes of violence against women and drug-related crimes.

    https://www.adl.org/new-hate-and-old#executive-summary-

  455. Zumbuddi says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    That it was “recognizably” ADL that (was behind) Charlottesville debacle:

    – I worked for community leaders in C’ville. I and many other locals observed how, over time, a certain element moved into C’ville from NYC & DC & gradually took positions of influence in politics and UVa.

    I visited w/ C’ville friends & participated in 3 or 4 of the post-riot ‘reconciliation’ sessions at 3 separate churches.
    Each of the 3 churches used the same mayerials based on the same books published by ADL. More than a coincidence that Catholic, Episcopal, a d Unitarians all use same material.

    Re DC event:
    – The week before Unite the Right2 an Episcopal church in DC distributed a letter drafted and circulated by ADL to > 125 churches in DC region, demanding tbat UTR2 be shut down, forbidden to assemble or speak. A copy of letter is in my file. ADL spearheaded this censorship action.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Koseki
  456. Koseki says:

    Unz:…critique perfunctory…little attempt organize a media attack.

    I’ve thought about your tactics here for some time (pattern of behavior, high stakes, mulit-prong attack). I think you are probably correct at far as it goes.

    However I see potential miscalculations (all due to too much humility, false or real). Look, the ADL isn’t completely dumb and is genuinely afraid to engage you. Why?

    1) Lack of real talent there; what the hell, how much brains works at a loser place like the ADL? Who is going to write the pieces attacking you, and then address your invariable and rapid response? Not me!

    2) You cannot easily be deplatformed or shamed (being tied to other deplatformed popular writers Sailer, Derb).

    3) You have the time, will, and talent to engage. Nobody else does. Like Alcatraz, if you escape, it will ruin their greatest weapon: intimidation. Why play into your hands?

    4) Corollary to #3, you have too much “connection” potential (real or imagined). Politics, business, and let’s face it, Jewish. There is too much unknown from their POV. Too much risk.

    Really want a battle? Start a pattern of behavior defending other (carefully selected) folk the ADL attacks. But do so in an honest, rigorous, and mocking way. Then you cannot easily be ignored.

    Just please wear a bullet-proof vest and get a food-tester first. I’m starting to like this place.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  457. Ron Unz says:
    @Koseki

    Sure, those points about why they’re reluctant to seriously attack are pretty similar to my own reasoning.

    Since I’ve been preparing my response, I went back and reread their piece again, and I really think the staffer who wrote it seemed a bit intimidated by all the material I’d covered. His descriptions of my arguments seemed much more respectful than I would have expected.

    Incidentally, before I recently went back to writing, I’d been tied up for almost two years on software work, so it’s possible that some of the newer readers may be unfamiliar with my previous articles. Here’s the final piece I’d done, providing something of an overview of my broader strategy:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-breaching-the-media-barrier/

    Personally, I suspect that one serious weakness of the ADL is that at least 95% of its own staffers probably know less about their own organization than I do. I plan to help enlighten them in that regard…

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @JackOH
  458. @Zumbuddi

    Wow! How blatant. Still ADL attacks could easily be sneakier. If we look hard we may see some sign that they have already begun though we should be wary of paranoia.

  459. @Ron Unz

    Looking, as ever, for reason to quibble (oops! I almost said “cavil” but looked it up) I considered the case of accusations against multiple priests of sexual abuse, or multiple cover ups by bishops. Undoubtedly retired cop Seamus O’Hara is going to be dismissed as a nutter if he comes out (circa 1980) with an allegation that sexual abuse and it’s cover up is rife throughout the Catholic Church rather than make a specific limited accusation.. So, what’s the difference? Multiple sources. Different lines of evidence leading to the same conclusion. With your generally wide reading (albeit necessarily selective from within a vast field) that’s what you have provided. So not much of an attack by ADL.

    Nonetheless I wonder if it wasn’t a junior ADL staffer who decided to do his minuscule bit in editing the James Petras Wikipedia entry by adding to the references to his being a regular contributor to Counterpunch and Atlantic Free Press the words [preceded by a full stop, which proves that it is a later addition] “and the far right right website Unz.com”.

  460. @Ron Unz

    I have just caught up with what I take to be the ADL’s (mild toned) reply under discussion. I.e.

    https://www.adl.org/blog/california-entrepreneur-ron-unz-launches-a-series-of-rhetorical-attacks-on-jews

    It is well judged by whoever decided to publish. It won’t encourage anyone, Jewish or not, to take a further interest in your series but provide some inoculation for those who might think of it or are sampling. And it is better than the alternative, until in the end they might think it is forced on them, of mustering a vast Is dotted Ts crossed reaearch effort and its editing for publication which would convince an unprejudiced reader. Better because, apart from perhaps having to make unwelcome admissions, the great cost in money and time might lead to almost no one reading the output from the mighty labours. So it might provide nothing more productive than a security blanket for journalists and all purpose pundits who want to be able to say with assurance that all the refutations are contained in ADL’s Unziad volume that they hope to finish reading some day.

  461. @Tyrion 2

    Nonetheless if you list even half of Ron’s accusations, as the ADL did, with all of the filler subtracted, you are left with an utterly self-discrediting rant.

    You, being a practitioner of self-discrediting rants, ought to know about such things, but apparently don’t, and continuously self-discredit. Furthermore, you’ve discredited nothing about RU’s claims.

  462. Koseki says:
    @Zumbuddi

    I’m always torn by these sort of claims. I don’t doubt the “post event” involvement, but a planned setup? With serious lead time? How does that even work?

    over time, a certain element moved into C’ville from NYC & DC & gradually took positions of influence in politics and UVa.

    This is serious, long-term planing. A change-agent, not a reaction. If true, the ADL is no loser org at all as I claimed, but a serious foe with bold initiative and talent. Look, I’m a skeptic. Convince me.

  463. Dear Mr. Unz,

    I cannot ‘deny’ the Holocaust, because I was not there when it allegedly occurred. What Americans–indeed all citizens of the world–should know is that Jews who WERE there, and who claimed to have witnessed the gassing of their fellow Jews within concentration camps testified in a court-of-law during the Zundel “False News” Trial. Each of those Jews were revealed as charlatans, who merely parroted rumors that spread around the camps of homicidal gassing and other atrocities, most of which were the product of War Atrocity Propaganda efforts. The entire Jewish Holocaust consists of nothing more than the visceral, histrionic reaction by Jews and their coterie of defenders toward any attempt to verify it. Once this event is subjected to ANY scrutiny, it dissolves into a compilation of conflicting stories and outright baloney.

  464. anon[410] • Disclaimer says:

    maybe its a case where (((they))) refuse to accept any criticism, no matter how valid, from the lowly cattle.

    Ron isn’t one of the cattle so……

  465. @Ron Unz

    As I couldn’t remember anything about Mark Weber – if I had ever heard of him – I did some Googling and came across this

    http://vho.org/GB/Journals/JHR/11/3/Weber353-359.html

    from which you can extract the exact Deborah Lipstadt quote, and its context, from an essay she wrote for the ADL, to the effect that

    “to debate them [Historical Revisionists] is to risk giving their efforts the imprimatur of a legitimate historical opinion”.

    It occurs to me that the corollary is that dismissive contradiction is better than debate for ADL purposes. And misrepresentation, as practised by Lipstadt according to Weber, could be a tactic as there is advantage for some in boring most readers with back and forth over relatively small details if the misrepresented party actually bothers to counter the offence.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  466. JackOH says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron, FWIW, I’ve “sold” UR to junior faculty at our local state university. Several people there know I comment regularly here. Norman Finkelstein spoke here a while back, and I’d like to think I had some distant influence on that happening. I’ve mentioned your name in locally published writing, and Sailer’s “coalition of the fringes” phrase likewise.

    The big smorgasbord of topics here, the analytical length at which some controversial subjects are covered, the many studious and nuanced comments offered beneath the articles here, etc., pretty much make a simple slash ‘n’ burn hit job difficult, at least in my opinion. Not impossible, just difficult. Just a thought.

  467. @Wizard of Oz

    It is my belief that the “Alinsky Method” described in his “Rules for Radicals” tome is required reading for Jews in their Yeshivas. Each of them, particularly their Holocaust polemics, demonstrates that form of discourse when gentiles dare to confront members of the tribe on that topic.

  468. @Rich

    “…if the ADL, or any totalitarian organization were to argue with Mr. Unz, they would lose.” Good luck with that. There’s a reason why a 40 foot Menorah is erected on the White House Lawn during Hanukkah, while our leaders journey to Jerusalem to demonstrate their servile status to Israel by standing at the Wailing Wall. They also take time out to legislate and bolster “Hate Crime Laws” which protect Jews. (All this while smarmy Jewish celebrities emphasize the “Separation of Church and State”….) Perhaps you need to study this tribe more thoroughly. You may begin to grasp the gravity of many perils gentiles face when they publicly oppose Jewish power, or deny their precious Holocaust. France at least has had their fill. Russia, too, is in the process of removing their diaspora. Trump is marching in lockstep to the dictates of the Knesset. That may provide you a clue as to how much success fed up Americans will have trying to warn our populations about this tribe.

    • Replies: @Wade
  469. Begins first paragraph with the word “I” then proceeds to mention it plenty;
    almost as if he is writing in a diary to himself.
    One would think he did not take english grammar in those ivy vines.

  470. Wade says:
    @David Baker

    Russia, too, is in the process of removing their diaspora.

    Didn’t Putin pass a law recently criminalizing Holocaust Denial?

    • Replies: @APilgrim
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
Personal Classics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.