The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
Young, Red States Are the Most Solvent; Old, Blue States the Least So
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Mercatus Center at GMU recently released a report on the fiscal health of each of the states–or more precisely, the fiscal health of each state’s government. The methodology looks sophisticated and reasonable. Since the report wasn’t commissioned to be evaluated on the factors I’m evaluating it on, I’m comfortable using it as a plausible proxy measure for actual state government solvency.

On social science measures like these–IQ, health, standard-of-living, etc–that’s unusual. The Dakotas do well on most things, but Mississippi and Alabama don’t. Massachusetts tends to turn in a good performance, but California usually doesn’t.

So what caught my attention immediately is how red states do noticeably better than blue states. Puerto Rico wasn’t included in the analysis, but it would’ve fit the framework perfectly.

The correlation between fiscal health and Romney’s share of the ’12 vote is an impressive .42 (p = .002). The contrasts between demographically similar but politically dissimilar states like the Dakotas-v-Minnesota and Indiana-v-Illinois put in stark relief the tendency for red states to be in better fiscal shape than blue states.

Another strong (inverse) correlation exists between fiscal health and median age, .44 (p = .001). Old states are in more trouble than young states are. This isn’t surprising because one of the largest liabilities states face comes in the form of state employee pensions. In older states more people are getting to the point where they’re able to draw on them and many more already are drawing on them and have been doing so for years or even decades.

Average IQ and the percentage of the population that is non-Hispanic white don’t correlate with fiscal health at the state level, inversely and positively at just .08 and .10, respectively. The percentage of the population that is black and foreign-born are only modestly more telling, correlating inversely at .21 and .23 (p = .15 and p = .12), respectively. So while it’s not that pronounced, it is still the case that while diversity is strength… it’s also fiscal insolvency.

The so-called ‘resource curse‘–which is mostly just a convenient explanation blank slatists superficially plug in when it works (Saudi Arabia) but ignore when it doesn’t (Norway)–is nowhere to be found. Or rather it’s there, but it takes the form of a resource boon. North Dakota and Alaska are energy producing machines and are also among the most fiscally sound states in the country.

(Republished from The Audacious Epigone by permission of author or representative)
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Isn't Puerto Rico the red 51 in the lower right corner? I'm too lazy to look up the original study for a chart/table/appendix.

  2. Dan,

    Yes. I didn't have all of the available metrics to correlate it with the rest of the states, but it is the worst shape by far.

    Here's to Puerto Rican independence!

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS