The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
Time Machine in a Bottle
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Randall Parker has a fun post on hypothetical* time machine travel and what he fantasizes about being able to accomplish if given access to the requisite technology. In that spirit, the first three things that came to this rank amateur’s mind:

– 326, modern-day Serbia. Locate the place Constantine’s (probably) illegitimate but competent son Crispus was being held and hold off the assassin the irascible emperor dispatched to off him. Next, make Constantine and his court aware that Fausta framed Crispus and allow the emperor to gas her as he did.

The intent of this bit of social engineering being to avoid the in-fighting between Constantine’s three succeeding sons and prevent the breakup of the empire and the eventual collapse of its western half. A contiguous empire is maintained through the time of Justinian (or whoever wore the purple as a consequence of my meddling) and the wealth secured by Anastasius isn’t squandered on a quixotic and crippling quest to make the thing whole again.

Parenthetically, in a sort of wish-for-more-wishes move, I’d go back past Seneca all the way to Aristotle to inform tutors that their most important function was to instill a sense of just how damned important succession planning is. It should be the first order of business! In WEIRD societies we take the smooth transfer of power for granted in our own countries, but that’s not even the contemporary global norm, and it certainly hasn’t been the historical one. Staying with Rome, it barely made it 60 years after Augustus before a lack of prudent succession planning threatened imperial collapse.

– Circa 1190, England. Prince John would be informed in no uncertain terms that he was not to repeat the treachery he’d taken part, in league with his older brother Richard, against his father by doing the same to said older brother while the latter was on crusade. So doing would result in him becoming a unwilling teetotaler. Not because there wouldn’t be anymore alcohol in England, but because he’d be dead (a threat I’d rather not have to make good on, because as a good little-R republican, I wouldn’t want to indirectly keep the Magna Carta from coming into existence!). Instead, he would loyally and dutifully work to maintain his brother’s holdings in England and Normandy until Richard had completed the third crusade’s stated objective of retaking Jerusalem.

Staying in Acre for a few months longer than he actually did, Richard joyfully receives the news of Saladin’s death. Taking advantage of the internecine fighting between Saladin’s sons and their uncle for control of the Ayyubid dynasty, Richard reestablishes the Kingdom of Jerusalem to something like it’s borders after the first crusade. If things shake out right, maybe he eventually even takes Egypt.

Perhaps this just pushes the ultimate collapse of the crusader states back a few decades, but alternatively maybe it leads to substantial amounts of Islamic territory reverting to Christianity. The fourth crusade doesn’t happen–or if it does, it gets to Egypt–so Byzantium doesn’t fall to the Latins. Instead, it becomes more than a moribund shell of its former self for the next three centuries before ultimately falling to the Ottomans. Obscenely optimistically, this gets us to a 21st century in which Antioch Christians in Syria and Coptics in Egypt constitute majorities of their respective countries’ populations.

Less sexily, I could shoot for pretty much the same thing by pulling Frederick Barbarossa out of the Saleph river before he drowned.

– 1600, modern-day Gifo Prefecture. Prior to the decisive battle of Sekigahara, I’d appear–attempting to replicate something similar to Constantine’s putative Milvian Bridge conversion experience–to both Ieyasu and Mitsunari, explaining to both in turn that promising to open Japan up to European influence would guarantee each one of them the ability to consolidate the country under his family’s rule. If that results in the Tokugawa shogunate settling in as it did or if it leads to an Ishida shogunate filling the void isn’t important, so long as the winning side welcomes the Dutch and Portuguese with open arms instead of keeping them at arm’s length for decades and decades. Commodore Perry can force his way into somewhere in Southeast Asia instead.

Let’s give Japan a two centuries’ head start on what history gave her. It’ll trickle down to Korea and China. We might be opening a Pandora’s box, but maybe a more serious East keeps Europe from ripping itself apart in WWI.

These necessarily presume a Great Man approach to history. While I personally lean a little more in the direction of Herbert Spencer, it doesn’t matter much in this context since it’s presumably beyond the scope of a single time traveler to engineer meaningful changes of entire social environments. If a single man is going to change history, it’s going to have to be by changing the outcomes of the great men of history.

* The specific word choice here is deliberate, since it strikes me as blatantly obvious that travelling backwards in time is impossible. If it were possible, we’d see evidence of it all the time. Yes, in the future it is conceivable that for understandable reasons there would be lots of restrictions on journeying into the past like not allowing anyone or anything to realize you were there, but that’s an impossibly high standard to maintain–unless, I suppose, humanity (or whatever would travel backwards in time) had been so completely altered from humans today so as to be characterized by a nature unrecognizable to us in the early 21st Century. They’d all have to be members of the hivemind or surely somewhere some teenager would go out on a time travel joyride without his parents’ permission.

(Republished from The Audacious Epigone by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 5 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. So far as I know, no teenager has set out to develop a nuke without parental permission. Some things are expensive enough to be somewhat regulated.
    -dumb

  2. I might go the other way, and help Hannibal win his Punic War. Rome would not been destroyed, just greatly weakened. Instead of having a Pax Romana which, although having a short term economic benefit, led to stagnation in pretty much all forms of learning, and a collapse leading to a long Dark Age. The more multipolar word that would have emerged out of a Carthaginian victory would have led to an ancient world more resembling Renaissance Europe. There might not have been a Dark Age, and the Phoenicians might have help off Islam.

    Plus I would have found a way to help the Athenians at Delium.

  3. Anon,

    Severely messing up the past wouldn't require nuclear technology. There is a lot of havoc a 21st century man equipped with 21st century personal gadgets could wreak.

    BTL,

    I understand the balance of power approach. There was a lot of overlap between the socio-political structures of Rome and Carthage.

    How do you bring Rome to defeat without causing her to collapse entirely, though? Hannibal thought he had done so after Trasimene and then surely after Cannae, but Rome wouldn't come to terms. Pyrrhus was just the most infamous non-Roman to suffer from Rome's tenacity.

  4. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    20th century Germans would have invented a time machine had it not been for ww2. Most likely, some demi-Hitler comes to power, disenfranchises and breaks the cultural and banking power of the Jews. Demi-Hitler makes no international forays, but mounting pressure from Jews in Western Europe and the US lead the to premature attempts at revolution and the political and social repression, yet all without any genocide. The civil rights movement in the US fails to achieve much, there is no mass immigration, and the ethnic make up of Western cities and institutions maintains its stability. As peace and prosperity spreads, some Jews, jealous of their lost power and enraged by the happiness of Europeans in general, utilize the time machine to kill baby demi-Hitler. Hitler comes to power in his place.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS