The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
The Fuentes Rises?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Like Hector and Ajax, Kirk and Fuentes have fought to a standstill. Google search volumes over the last three months for the two variants of contemporary American conservatism:

Though interest across the entire country is near parity, there are marked regional differences:

Fuentes’ America first populism has an important edge in the upper Midwest and Pennsylvania. As demographic change forever surrenders the once reliably red states of Georgia and Texas, Republicans will have to not only lock down Trump’s big flips in 2016 but also clinch Minnesota, New Hampshire, and Maine to remain politically viable at the national level.

If from the 2016 election Democrats gain Georgia and Texas but give up Maine, Minnesota, and New Hampshire, the electoral college splits, 269-269. That even configuration won’t survive the 2020 Census, though, as Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan are all projected to lose electoral votes.

Shortly after Georgia and Texas go blue, the demographic transition will come for Florida and Arizona. At that point the Republican path to victory requires flips outside of what is currently perceived as possible. The GOP will have to win something like Illinois, Oregon, and Washington–not one of them, but all three.

For any hope of realizing this realignment, Republicans will have to aggressively become the party of working Americans. Trump provided the template. More skilled political craftsmen will need to trace it with more deftness and greater precision than Trump has.

As a humorous aside, Kirk’s highest search volume comes in Colorado, followed by Nevada. What’s smoked in the Rockies dissipates in the Rockies and what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. That’s how the culture war is won!

 
• Category: Culture/Society, Ideology • Tags: Media, Politics 
Hide 47 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Nick will be a good litmus test for how long you can push against a certain (((agenda))) before the agenda makers decide to ruin your life in its entirety.

    God bless that little Nicker.

  2. Problem is, Fuentes is this classical variant of le every race and creed under muh constitushen, which is destined for failure. He evolved quite a bit in two years though, so maybe this will change.
    Kirk is full homo.

    • Replies: @Athletic and Whitesplosive
    @WHAT

    Most of that is just a smokescreen for plausible deniability, much like AE's "no potty-mouth in the comments" policy, and just as ineffective.

    Sure, neither of them is actually a "nazi" or "supremacist", but they do hold positions regarding ethnic politics which are waaaay outside the acceptable window of the globalist paradigm, and this is trivial to prove. The media and big tech in general have not been held accountable for making these proper distinctions, so they almost definitely won't; meaning that taking the effort to weakly make the liberal case for a sane immigration policy or justify white activism is mostly a waste of time. It's not convincing and it won't protect you from whatever the powers that be might want to persecute you with should you catch their attention.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  3. @WHAT
    Problem is, Fuentes is this classical variant of le every race and creed under muh constitushen, which is destined for failure. He evolved quite a bit in two years though, so maybe this will change.
    Kirk is full homo.

    Replies: @Athletic and Whitesplosive

    Most of that is just a smokescreen for plausible deniability, much like AE’s “no potty-mouth in the comments” policy, and just as ineffective.

    Sure, neither of them is actually a “nazi” or “supremacist”, but they do hold positions regarding ethnic politics which are waaaay outside the acceptable window of the globalist paradigm, and this is trivial to prove. The media and big tech in general have not been held accountable for making these proper distinctions, so they almost definitely won’t; meaning that taking the effort to weakly make the liberal case for a sane immigration policy or justify white activism is mostly a waste of time. It’s not convincing and it won’t protect you from whatever the powers that be might want to persecute you with should you catch their attention.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Athletic and Whitesplosive

    Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages. How far outside the acceptable window is that?

    I don’t know if he wants to ban such relationships however. Being against interracial marriages is merely a personal view and, as such, shouldn’t trouble anyone. But banning! That’s something to fight or support!

    Replies: @Sgt. Joe Friday, @Corvinus, @Jay Fink

  4. Anonymous[211] • Disclaimer says:
    @Athletic and Whitesplosive
    @WHAT

    Most of that is just a smokescreen for plausible deniability, much like AE's "no potty-mouth in the comments" policy, and just as ineffective.

    Sure, neither of them is actually a "nazi" or "supremacist", but they do hold positions regarding ethnic politics which are waaaay outside the acceptable window of the globalist paradigm, and this is trivial to prove. The media and big tech in general have not been held accountable for making these proper distinctions, so they almost definitely won't; meaning that taking the effort to weakly make the liberal case for a sane immigration policy or justify white activism is mostly a waste of time. It's not convincing and it won't protect you from whatever the powers that be might want to persecute you with should you catch their attention.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages. How far outside the acceptable window is that?

    I don’t know if he wants to ban such relationships however. Being against interracial marriages is merely a personal view and, as such, shouldn’t trouble anyone. But banning! That’s something to fight or support!

    • Replies: @Sgt. Joe Friday
    @Anonymous

    I don't advocate banning interracial marriage, but I learned the hard way that it's not a good idea. Men and women have a tough enough time communicating without throwing in the extra added bonus of differing cultural norms and expectations.

    , @Corvinus
    @Anonymous

    "Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages."

    Considering that his descendants are from different racial stock, I would say he is being his normal posturing, hypocritical self.

    Fuentes was recently taken to task by the intensifying crabbiness of Alt Right leader Vox Day.

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/12/little-nicky-debate-challenge-take-three.html

    Replies: @Anon, @Audacious Epigone

    , @Jay Fink
    @Anonymous

    I'll admit it. The only interracial couples that bother me are black man/white woman. In a fantasy world I would ban them. Every other combination is fine with me including the popular white man/Asian woman pairings.

    Replies: @Anonymous

  5. The problem with both gentlemen is that when it comes to tackling issues, they seem incapable attending to critiques of substance. And in my view,

    The Constitution matters (as do data sets and there most accurate rendering)

    dismissing it merely because it causes your position hurdles exposes just how shallow the thought process is regarding what is being advocated.

    They should at least have the courage to reject the founding principles and why the country should adopt some other standard.

    —————————–

    I will continue to reject the “populist” label. It’s application was adopted by anyone who opposed the conservative turn back practices that benefit US citizens. I will speak for myself. I voted for the president for reasons that were decidedly policy oriented not merely on my emotional opposition against the alternative.

    • Replies: @anon
    @EliteCommInc.

    The Constitution matters

    To whom?

  6. Anon[399] • Disclaimer says:

    You need to consider that two things will be happening simultaneously here.

    Yes, states like TX and AZ will shift toward the Ds based on racial demographics. But whites in general will be shifting toward the Rs at the same time. That includes both the populists and the cuckservatives (who will continue to claim that Dems are the real racists).

    As whites shift right, a lot of these states become more competitive. TX and GA and FL and VA will be competitive, not solidly blue. Several of those states are only in danger of becoming blue because they have a lot of left-leaning whites. But those whites will be waking up in the 2020s once the threat becomes more obvious. Once you adjust for whites shifting right over time, the maps become a lot less lopsided.

    Eventually (in the 2030s or 2040s), the racial and geographic differences will become the basis for either partition or a military coup (as is common in Latin America, most recently in Bolivia).

    • Replies: @216
    @Anon


    But those whites will be waking up in the 2020s once the threat becomes more obvious.
     
    We're talking about unmarried white women here, one of the most difficult demographics for the GOP.

    I do predict that the "cat lady phenomenon" will result in an abrupt turn to the right, but there's nothing that ensures that it will happen and that the GOP will benefit. Neoliberal Dems might benefit instead.

    In Occupied Redstan states like VA and CO, the elected Dems are all neoliberals that have little to do with labor unions, nor have they used legislative majorities to raise taxes. That would have to change in order to shift left-of-center moderates back to the right.

    Replies: @216

  7. Nick Fuentes is using his own name and he is making it clear that there is an abundance of patriotic daylight between the interests of the American Empire and the interests of Israel and he is talking about mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and demography and Fuentes is challenging the donor whores to debates and he is preparing the groundwork to either take over the Republican Party or destroy it and replace it with a new patriotic party that advances the interests of the European Christian ancestral core of the USA.

    Somewhere in between Sam Huntington’s British Protestant settler nation and Pat Buchanan’s European Christian nation is the simple use of the term European Christian to bridge the gap between the people who got to this land by sail power on wooden ships or by steam power and coal power in steel boats.

    Nick Fuentes is displaying the courage of one who won’t bow down to the smelly little orthodoxies that hobble the minds of filthy cowards who won’t honestly discuss the JEW QUESTION or demography or immigration policy.

    If the choice is between this extremely young Nick Fuentes and this extremely annoying donor whore scamp named Charlie Kirk, then I say it is Nick Fuentes.

    The Groypers and Nick Fuentes must be congratulated and thanked for asking tough questions of donor whores such as Charlie Kirk and Dan Crenshaw and others.

    Dan Crenshaw is a Republican Party donor whore politician from the Houston area, and Dan Crenshaw pushes nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration. Dan Crenshaw also puts the interests of Israel over and above the interests of the American Empire.

    I admire the guts of Nick Fuentes and the Groypers as they take on the Republican Party donor whores and the ruling class.

    Let’s have an old timer’s day walk down memory lane to 2007 when this writer went after US Senator John McCain on McCain’s support for mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    Charles Pewitt Confronts US Sen. John McCain On Immigration Policy(2007) at minute 58:00:

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?201489-1/mccain-campaign-event

    Tweet from 2015:

  8. Doesn’t it matter that Kirk is already much more well known? More people need to google Fuentes to find out who he is. Just for fun, I checked Andrew Yang versus Joe Biden, they get about equal search activity, very unlikely that means they’re equally popular.

  9. @Anonymous
    @Athletic and Whitesplosive

    Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages. How far outside the acceptable window is that?

    I don’t know if he wants to ban such relationships however. Being against interracial marriages is merely a personal view and, as such, shouldn’t trouble anyone. But banning! That’s something to fight or support!

    Replies: @Sgt. Joe Friday, @Corvinus, @Jay Fink

    I don’t advocate banning interracial marriage, but I learned the hard way that it’s not a good idea. Men and women have a tough enough time communicating without throwing in the extra added bonus of differing cultural norms and expectations.

  10. Genuinely surprised that Kirk gets such a big part of the map. Guess astroturfing is more effective than I thought.

  11. CO and NV intensity for Kirk = CA refugee boomercons?

    Maybe the same thing across the south – NorthEast retiree boomers

  12. @Anonymous
    @Athletic and Whitesplosive

    Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages. How far outside the acceptable window is that?

    I don’t know if he wants to ban such relationships however. Being against interracial marriages is merely a personal view and, as such, shouldn’t trouble anyone. But banning! That’s something to fight or support!

    Replies: @Sgt. Joe Friday, @Corvinus, @Jay Fink

    “Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages.”

    Considering that his descendants are from different racial stock, I would say he is being his normal posturing, hypocritical self.

    Fuentes was recently taken to task by the intensifying crabbiness of Alt Right leader Vox Day.

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/12/little-nicky-debate-challenge-take-three.html

    • Replies: @Anon
    @Corvinus

    Being against mixed race marriage, when the result of a mixed race union oneself, is not posturing nor hypocritical. Its selfless.

    Hypocrisy is defined by the difference between two conscious actions or life choices. Being born is not a choice. Welcome to the English language.

    There are myriad of reasons to be against inter-racial marriage: the best one possibly being that it creates offspring who will not neatly fit into a sociopolitical group and therefore will represent the beginning of a new one with all of its conflicting needs and hostility to out-groups.

    Beyond that, its isolating and unpleasant for the offspring.

    Creating new groups is pointless and counter to peace. We already have enough of them who are trying and failing to get along. Though, we do recognize the Jewish drive to stoke chaos and create new political armies to combat their White enemies, and so I understand the Semitic endorsement of inter-racial marriage outside of the Jewish group. You predictably conform with this pattern of anti-White hostility.

    Nick Funetes is selfless in that he knows that standing up for the correct, God determined order of the World will both promote morality and reduce conflict and suffering over the long term. All the while possibly working against his own procreative ambition. That's the perspective of a moral human being, and it stands in stark contrast with the Semitic perspective that is willing to destroy the World's Order and morality in order to reduce competition and therefore assure more Semitic procreation.

    Replies: @Corvinus, @MikeatMikedotMike

    , @Audacious Epigone
    @Corvinus

    Would you say the same about the child of divorced parents who advocates for parents staying together to raise their children?

    I don't take a hardline on the question, but it is important that prospective parents realize the potential issues surrounding parents and children who do not look like one another. That doesn't mean it can't work, but it can complicate things.

  13. @Anonymous
    @Athletic and Whitesplosive

    Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages. How far outside the acceptable window is that?

    I don’t know if he wants to ban such relationships however. Being against interracial marriages is merely a personal view and, as such, shouldn’t trouble anyone. But banning! That’s something to fight or support!

    Replies: @Sgt. Joe Friday, @Corvinus, @Jay Fink

    I’ll admit it. The only interracial couples that bother me are black man/white woman. In a fantasy world I would ban them. Every other combination is fine with me including the popular white man/Asian woman pairings.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    @Jay Fink

    Lol. If course you being a white male, you don't like black guys taking your women.

    Here is the real deal for you. Too bad. Black men with white women is only growing in popularity.

    Replies: @Jay Fink

  14. Anon[170] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus
    @Anonymous

    "Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages."

    Considering that his descendants are from different racial stock, I would say he is being his normal posturing, hypocritical self.

    Fuentes was recently taken to task by the intensifying crabbiness of Alt Right leader Vox Day.

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/12/little-nicky-debate-challenge-take-three.html

    Replies: @Anon, @Audacious Epigone

    Being against mixed race marriage, when the result of a mixed race union oneself, is not posturing nor hypocritical. Its selfless.

    Hypocrisy is defined by the difference between two conscious actions or life choices. Being born is not a choice. Welcome to the English language.

    There are myriad of reasons to be against inter-racial marriage: the best one possibly being that it creates offspring who will not neatly fit into a sociopolitical group and therefore will represent the beginning of a new one with all of its conflicting needs and hostility to out-groups.

    Beyond that, its isolating and unpleasant for the offspring.

    Creating new groups is pointless and counter to peace. We already have enough of them who are trying and failing to get along. Though, we do recognize the Jewish drive to stoke chaos and create new political armies to combat their White enemies, and so I understand the Semitic endorsement of inter-racial marriage outside of the Jewish group. You predictably conform with this pattern of anti-White hostility.

    Nick Funetes is selfless in that he knows that standing up for the correct, God determined order of the World will both promote morality and reduce conflict and suffering over the long term. All the while possibly working against his own procreative ambition. That’s the perspective of a moral human being, and it stands in stark contrast with the Semitic perspective that is willing to destroy the World’s Order and morality in order to reduce competition and therefore assure more Semitic procreation.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    @Anon

    "Being against mixed race marriage, when the result of a mixed race union oneself, is not posturing nor hypocritical. Its selfless."

    Was his ancestors the product of a forced race mixing or one by mutual appreciation? That latter would be the selfless act.

    "Hypocrisy is defined by the difference between two conscious actions or life choices. Being born is not a choice. Welcome to the English language."

    Being born is the choice of the parents, along with their decision to race mix.

    "The best one possibly being that it creates offspring who will not neatly fit into a sociopolitical group and therefore will represent the beginning of a new one with all of its conflicting needs and hostility to out-groups."

    Assuming that there will be conflict and hostility that results. You do realize that the mixing of a Catholic-Jew or a Polish-Italian had also created this other than neat fit sociologically, right?

    "Beyond that, its isolating and unpleasant for the offspring."

    Thank you for the virtue signaling wrapped up with concern trolling. In the end, it is up to the parents and their mixed race children to decide how to approach whatever is thrown their way.

    "Creating new groups is pointless and counter to peace."

    According to Who/Whom?

    "Nick Funetes is selfless in that he knows that standing up for the correct, God determined order of the World will both promote morality and reduce conflict and suffering over the long term."

    Here is the correct, God determined order of the World.

    Proverbs 6:16-19
    There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.

    People look down on others for different reasons; it might be related to their education, their accomplishments, their obedience...OR THEIR BACKGROUND! Pride has many different faces: some people are “holier than thou” while others are “worldlier than thou”; one person is proud of being so well-read while another person say, “I’m not book smart; I’m street smart”; one person is proud of being fashionable while another person is proud of being oblivious to fashion. Pride is an insidious, pervasive thing, especially if it is related to one's whiteness, blackness, or redness.

    Deuteronomy 10:17-19--God loves the orphan, the widow, and the stranger.

    One is able to infer from this simple, beautiful passage that regardless of a person's station in life, God commands his disciples to be dignified and show dignity.

    John 4:1-42

    Jesus broke with societal and religious customs to honor the dignity of the Samaritan woman. He associated with a woman of mixed origins, a moral and social outsider, in public and asked her for a drink of water. He demonstrated dignity of the most highest degree-every person is precious.

    God has commanded his disciples to love all of humanity. When God communicates Himself, when He fills us with Himself, He fills us with His Divine Life, with His infinite Love, for He is Love. He confirms that we must share in this Divine nature for God to attract us to Himself because sharing His Grace is His nature.

    , @MikeatMikedotMike
    @Anon

    Well stated regarding your points about the race mixing, and I would say that the bigger the observable differences are (like, most aptly, between Africans and Europeans) the more confused these mixed offspring are going to be, especially in a culture like that of the US that currently celebrates one of the races and vilifies the other.

  15. intercolor relations — a sideshow and not even a miniscule contributor to the issues that matter concerning US identity.

    His personal preference won’t have any impact on identity of citizens. Work, pay their taxes, abide by the rules as set astride the founding document, take care of family, support the US as a nation and be loyal to the same —- and seek to maintain our national existence —-

    here’s an issue —

    english as the national language and no one coming to the US should even be permitted if they cannot fill out the required documents and pass said exam.

    oppose the current border fence as opposed to a wall as promised.

    oppose the current farm legislation that will grant amnesty to illegal aliens —

    support the practice by some property owners to deny housing to those here illegally

    good grief intercolor marriage —

    whether they like pumpkin pie, apple or both is of no consequence

  16. I love his America First podcast, he has a lot of popularity among us youth in Central Florida. Voter registration trends supports that.

    First is that the south is predicted to have a lot of climate related issues throughout the 21st century and GDP loss. My overall prediction is massive white flight from the South + Violence

    That said the future of the traditional South is very complex. Thanks to the Voter Rights Act the Southern states are required to post voter registration data. Black people are over-registered for actual population size for Gen Z/Millennials, especially in Louisiana and Georgia (47% of registrants) and if we look at Florida’s midterm black young women overvoted for the actual % they represent or Mississippi in 2012. Worse for us is that non-college/some college whites don’t begin voting till much later in life (45+) but do follow others of their sociology group, that said we’re still winning white millennials in all southern states (Virginia isn’t southern) of various degrees with Louisiana being the best.

    Between 2006 to 2016, the only states where black turnout exceeded white turnout in presidential elections on average were Alabama, the District of Columbia, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.

    In districts in which African Americans enjoy political prominence, white constituents are more likely to remain on the margins of the electoral process. Black congressional incumbents routinely experience white
    turnout rates that are 5–18 points lower than at polling places elsewhere in the state. This consistent pattern of white demobilization is not offset by an equally consistent pattern of black mobilization. – Study 1

    Both Black and White voter turnout increases 2-3 percentage points with each New Black Democrat on the ballot. Given the groups’ representations in the population, the White response is numerically greater. Whites of both parties are less likely to vote for their parties’ candidate when s/he is Black. The turnout findings are not explained away by voter, election, or politician characteristics. However, the fact that there is no turnout response to Black Republicans suggests that a perception of Blacks’ ideology may be a factor. – Study 2

    We find little evidence that African American voter turnout increases when voters are moved to African American candidates. We find some evidence that white voters, however, tend to vote at lower rates when they are represented by African American candidates. – Study 3

    Large scale empirical study of thousands of districts at once has shown the same thing: Dem areas zone tighter, and leftward shifts are followed by tighter local zoning. Studies have shown demolishing predominantly African-American housing projects makes nearby white people immediately start voting for Democrats (and Blacks who bought homes in a suburb of Washington, DC, were considerably less politically active than whites who gentrified the central city, it also seems to lower black vote according to Georgia, and South Carolina data) – Study 4

    This research focuses on whites’ reactions to the racial composition of the local population. Multilevel modeling is applied to a micro/macro data file that links 1990 General Social Survey responses to census information about respondents’ localities. On summary scales representing traditional prejudice, opposition to race-targeting, and policy-related beliefs, white negativity swells as the local black population share expands. Among non-Southern whites, a 10-point rise in the local percentage of blacks brings an increase in traditional prejudice greater than the decrease in prejudice that comes with three additional years of education. South/non-South differences in whites’ views about blacks are generally reduced to about one-half of their original size and fall short of statistical significance when local racial composition is controlled. Interestingly, concentrations of local Asian American and Latino populations do not engender white antipathy toward these groups. If whites’ reactions to the presence of blacks is a threat response, the specific dynamics of this threat await description.

    White left youth become more racially tolerant as the black percentage increases to about 35 percent and then become more intolerant as the black percentage increases beyond 35 percent. On the other hand, the effects of percentage Asian and percentage Latino on young liberal whites’ racial attitudes are linear. As the proportion of Asian and Latino students in a school grows young whites’ become more racially tolerant.

  17. If y’all have any state specific questions I’ll give you what i know.

  18. @Jay Fink
    @Anonymous

    I'll admit it. The only interracial couples that bother me are black man/white woman. In a fantasy world I would ban them. Every other combination is fine with me including the popular white man/Asian woman pairings.

    Replies: @Anonymous

    Lol. If course you being a white male, you don’t like black guys taking your women.

    Here is the real deal for you. Too bad. Black men with white women is only growing in popularity.

    • Replies: @Jay Fink
    @Anonymous

    The one consolation is for the most part (with exceptions of course) the white women with black men are not attractive to me, they are often overweight or obese.

    Replies: @216, @Oblivionrecurs, @Anonymous

  19. For any hope of realizing this realignment, Republicans will have to aggressively become the party of working Americans.

    If either party was saying up with work and wages and down with war and welfare it would have all the voters it would ever need. But is there any real money in that? And what does Conservatism have to do with it?

  20. @Anon
    @Corvinus

    Being against mixed race marriage, when the result of a mixed race union oneself, is not posturing nor hypocritical. Its selfless.

    Hypocrisy is defined by the difference between two conscious actions or life choices. Being born is not a choice. Welcome to the English language.

    There are myriad of reasons to be against inter-racial marriage: the best one possibly being that it creates offspring who will not neatly fit into a sociopolitical group and therefore will represent the beginning of a new one with all of its conflicting needs and hostility to out-groups.

    Beyond that, its isolating and unpleasant for the offspring.

    Creating new groups is pointless and counter to peace. We already have enough of them who are trying and failing to get along. Though, we do recognize the Jewish drive to stoke chaos and create new political armies to combat their White enemies, and so I understand the Semitic endorsement of inter-racial marriage outside of the Jewish group. You predictably conform with this pattern of anti-White hostility.

    Nick Funetes is selfless in that he knows that standing up for the correct, God determined order of the World will both promote morality and reduce conflict and suffering over the long term. All the while possibly working against his own procreative ambition. That's the perspective of a moral human being, and it stands in stark contrast with the Semitic perspective that is willing to destroy the World's Order and morality in order to reduce competition and therefore assure more Semitic procreation.

    Replies: @Corvinus, @MikeatMikedotMike

    “Being against mixed race marriage, when the result of a mixed race union oneself, is not posturing nor hypocritical. Its selfless.”

    Was his ancestors the product of a forced race mixing or one by mutual appreciation? That latter would be the selfless act.

    “Hypocrisy is defined by the difference between two conscious actions or life choices. Being born is not a choice. Welcome to the English language.”

    Being born is the choice of the parents, along with their decision to race mix.

    “The best one possibly being that it creates offspring who will not neatly fit into a sociopolitical group and therefore will represent the beginning of a new one with all of its conflicting needs and hostility to out-groups.”

    Assuming that there will be conflict and hostility that results. You do realize that the mixing of a Catholic-Jew or a Polish-Italian had also created this other than neat fit sociologically, right?

    “Beyond that, its isolating and unpleasant for the offspring.”

    Thank you for the virtue signaling wrapped up with concern trolling. In the end, it is up to the parents and their mixed race children to decide how to approach whatever is thrown their way.

    “Creating new groups is pointless and counter to peace.”

    According to Who/Whom?

    “Nick Funetes is selfless in that he knows that standing up for the correct, God determined order of the World will both promote morality and reduce conflict and suffering over the long term.”

    Here is the correct, God determined order of the World.

    Proverbs 6:16-19
    There are six things that the Lord hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.

    People look down on others for different reasons; it might be related to their education, their accomplishments, their obedience…OR THEIR BACKGROUND! Pride has many different faces: some people are “holier than thou” while others are “worldlier than thou”; one person is proud of being so well-read while another person say, “I’m not book smart; I’m street smart”; one person is proud of being fashionable while another person is proud of being oblivious to fashion. Pride is an insidious, pervasive thing, especially if it is related to one’s whiteness, blackness, or redness.

    Deuteronomy 10:17-19–God loves the orphan, the widow, and the stranger.

    One is able to infer from this simple, beautiful passage that regardless of a person’s station in life, God commands his disciples to be dignified and show dignity.

    John 4:1-42

    Jesus broke with societal and religious customs to honor the dignity of the Samaritan woman. He associated with a woman of mixed origins, a moral and social outsider, in public and asked her for a drink of water. He demonstrated dignity of the most highest degree-every person is precious.

    God has commanded his disciples to love all of humanity. When God communicates Himself, when He fills us with Himself, He fills us with His Divine Life, with His infinite Love, for He is Love. He confirms that we must share in this Divine nature for God to attract us to Himself because sharing His Grace is His nature.

  21. The “Illinois, Oregon and Washington” or Bust strategy…

    Ouch

    • Replies: @indocon
    @216

    Sounds more plausible than trying to convert Mr. and Mrs. Patel.

    Replies: @216

  22. @Anon
    You need to consider that two things will be happening simultaneously here.

    Yes, states like TX and AZ will shift toward the Ds based on racial demographics. But whites in general will be shifting toward the Rs at the same time. That includes both the populists and the cuckservatives (who will continue to claim that Dems are the real racists).

    As whites shift right, a lot of these states become more competitive. TX and GA and FL and VA will be competitive, not solidly blue. Several of those states are only in danger of becoming blue because they have a lot of left-leaning whites. But those whites will be waking up in the 2020s once the threat becomes more obvious. Once you adjust for whites shifting right over time, the maps become a lot less lopsided.

    Eventually (in the 2030s or 2040s), the racial and geographic differences will become the basis for either partition or a military coup (as is common in Latin America, most recently in Bolivia).

    Replies: @216

    But those whites will be waking up in the 2020s once the threat becomes more obvious.

    We’re talking about unmarried white women here, one of the most difficult demographics for the GOP.

    I do predict that the “cat lady phenomenon” will result in an abrupt turn to the right, but there’s nothing that ensures that it will happen and that the GOP will benefit. Neoliberal Dems might benefit instead.

    In Occupied Redstan states like VA and CO, the elected Dems are all neoliberals that have little to do with labor unions, nor have they used legislative majorities to raise taxes. That would have to change in order to shift left-of-center moderates back to the right.

    • Replies: @216
    @216

    Remember this

    https://twitter.com/pewresearch/status/1091876428189192192

    Replies: @Rosie

  23. In looking at incremental areas of opportunity, don’t overlook a place like Rhode Island, heavily white, Catholic, ethnic, and has not voted for a Republican since 1984. It will only have 3 EV post 2020, but it’s currently represented by two of the most obnoxious liberal white senators, any change in the state politics will have a direct impact on what type of people get elected.

    • Replies: @216
    @indocon

    Some of the leftist tilt of the Northeast is thanks to Puerto Ricans.

    The Hispanic "archetype" is a working class person of Mexican descent in the Southwest. But the picture is more complex than that.

    The Northeast is the most unionized region of the country, and the GOP's instinct is still to slash-and-burn the public sector.

    Even worse, the Northeast is loaded to the gills with universities, the graduates and employees of which hate the GOP with even more venom.

    Replies: @Oblivionrecurs

  24. @216
    The "Illinois, Oregon and Washington" or Bust strategy...

    Ouch

    Replies: @indocon

    Sounds more plausible than trying to convert Mr. and Mrs. Patel.

    • Replies: @216
    @indocon

    Probably easier to just have us all learn Russian and meme "Belarus or Bust" into reality.

    Replies: @indocon

  25. @indocon
    @216

    Sounds more plausible than trying to convert Mr. and Mrs. Patel.

    Replies: @216

    Probably easier to just have us all learn Russian and meme “Belarus or Bust” into reality.

    • Replies: @indocon
    @216

    Well pilgrim I have already immigrated once and have no desire to do so one more time, it's the USA or bust.

  26. The TPUSA conference featured the President of the United States, Senator Cruz, Ann Coulter, and the Project Veritas guy, as well as the usual menagerie of worthless neocons and grifters, and their videos still got less views than the “Groyper Leadership Conference” did.

    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
    @John Gruskos


    The TPUSA conference featured the President of the United States, Senator Cruz, Ann Coulter, and the Project Veritas guy, as well as the usual menagerie of worthless neocons and grifters, and their videos still got less views than the “Groyper Leadership Conference” did.

     

    Trump and Teddy Cruz openly push nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and they refuse to deport the upwards of 30 million illegal alien invaders in the USA.

    Ann Coulter gets her grit from Kentucky and her German blood. I'd say something more nice about Coulter but she ain't got no time for guys under 6 feet tall and she was once a supporter and booster for Mormon Mammonite Globalizer Romney. That tall dope in the White House that Coulter likes is a wife beater and a treasonous bastard who sides with the Chinese Communist Party and the Swamp City DC China First Lobby over the interests of the USA.

    The Project Veritas guy and the Neo-Conservatives and the Conservatism Inc. grifters are bought and paid for whores and they wouldn't tell the truth unless you outbid their whoremasters.

    Trump and Teddy Cruz also put the interests of Israel ahead of the interests of the USA.

    The Jew billionaire GOP donors and the GOP Cheap Labor Faction and other business interests are grooming Tom Cotton and Josh Hawley and Dan Crenshaw to add to their kept politician whores such as Marco Rubio and Teddy Cruz and Lindsey Graham and others.

    The Groypers are smart enough to know that the Republican Party is a donor-controlled outfit that would rather lose elections than push the kinds of America First policies that regular Whites want.

    The answer is to destroy the Republican Party and vote for and support the new political party called WHITE CORE AMERICA.

    White Core America Immigration Policy Pledge:

    Immigration Moratorium Now!

    Deport All Illegal Alien Invaders Now!
  27. @indocon
    In looking at incremental areas of opportunity, don't overlook a place like Rhode Island, heavily white, Catholic, ethnic, and has not voted for a Republican since 1984. It will only have 3 EV post 2020, but it's currently represented by two of the most obnoxious liberal white senators, any change in the state politics will have a direct impact on what type of people get elected.

    Replies: @216

    Some of the leftist tilt of the Northeast is thanks to Puerto Ricans.

    The Hispanic “archetype” is a working class person of Mexican descent in the Southwest. But the picture is more complex than that.

    The Northeast is the most unionized region of the country, and the GOP’s instinct is still to slash-and-burn the public sector.

    Even worse, the Northeast is loaded to the gills with universities, the graduates and employees of which hate the GOP with even more venom.

    • Replies: @Oblivionrecurs
    @216

    Puerto Ricans are one of the largest demicrat voting blocs, depending how you feel on Brazilians they're the most Dem Hispanic bloc.

  28. @216
    @Anon


    But those whites will be waking up in the 2020s once the threat becomes more obvious.
     
    We're talking about unmarried white women here, one of the most difficult demographics for the GOP.

    I do predict that the "cat lady phenomenon" will result in an abrupt turn to the right, but there's nothing that ensures that it will happen and that the GOP will benefit. Neoliberal Dems might benefit instead.

    In Occupied Redstan states like VA and CO, the elected Dems are all neoliberals that have little to do with labor unions, nor have they used legislative majorities to raise taxes. That would have to change in order to shift left-of-center moderates back to the right.

    Replies: @216

    Remember this

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @216

    They're also not very enthusiastic about the direction the party is taking.

    https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/396155-can-democrats-motivate-their-voters-actually-show-up-for-the

    Replies: @216

  29. @216
    @216

    Remember this

    https://twitter.com/pewresearch/status/1091876428189192192

    Replies: @Rosie

    They’re also not very enthusiastic about the direction the party is taking.

    https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/396155-can-democrats-motivate-their-voters-actually-show-up-for-the

    • Replies: @216
    @Rosie

    The Millennial women show a spike in '08 Obama enthusiasm, and then wildly swung against Trump and the GOP by proxy after he announced.

    UK exit polls from 2017 record the same pattern, so unless they were voting Labour to protest Trump (which is possible), there's something bigger going on.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_United_Kingdom_general_election#Voter_demographics

    New!

    Looks like the pattern has again shown up this year.

  30. @Rosie
    @216

    They're also not very enthusiastic about the direction the party is taking.

    https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/396155-can-democrats-motivate-their-voters-actually-show-up-for-the

    Replies: @216

    The Millennial women show a spike in ’08 Obama enthusiasm, and then wildly swung against Trump and the GOP by proxy after he announced.

    UK exit polls from 2017 record the same pattern, so unless they were voting Labour to protest Trump (which is possible), there’s something bigger going on.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_United_Kingdom_general_election#Voter_demographics

    New!

    Looks like the pattern has again shown up this year.

  31. @Anonymous
    @Jay Fink

    Lol. If course you being a white male, you don't like black guys taking your women.

    Here is the real deal for you. Too bad. Black men with white women is only growing in popularity.

    Replies: @Jay Fink

    The one consolation is for the most part (with exceptions of course) the white women with black men are not attractive to me, they are often overweight or obese.

    • Replies: @216
    @Jay Fink

    The question for public policy is whether black men pairing out (as much as stereotype, versus data) will lead to either poly with black women on the side, or to a larger number of black women becoming spinters. In order to be attractive to more white guys, obesity rates would have to drop considerably.

    Will those spinsters use sperm donors?

    And will it be from Tyrone, or from Chad?

    , @Oblivionrecurs
    @Jay Fink

    Black men love overweight and boisterous blonde women with attitude. Absolutely love it

    Replies: @iffen

    , @Anonymous
    @Jay Fink

    That sounds like wishful thinking.

    "The kneegrows are only taking our worst women."

    If you go to a tier 1 city like New York or LA you see many many of the hottest white women with a black guy on their arm.

    In fact I would say the majority of top tier white women in a big city have burned coal at some point.

    Replies: @Marty T

  32. @Jay Fink
    @Anonymous

    The one consolation is for the most part (with exceptions of course) the white women with black men are not attractive to me, they are often overweight or obese.

    Replies: @216, @Oblivionrecurs, @Anonymous

    The question for public policy is whether black men pairing out (as much as stereotype, versus data) will lead to either poly with black women on the side, or to a larger number of black women becoming spinters. In order to be attractive to more white guys, obesity rates would have to drop considerably.

    Will those spinsters use sperm donors?

    And will it be from Tyrone, or from Chad?

  33. @Anon
    @Corvinus

    Being against mixed race marriage, when the result of a mixed race union oneself, is not posturing nor hypocritical. Its selfless.

    Hypocrisy is defined by the difference between two conscious actions or life choices. Being born is not a choice. Welcome to the English language.

    There are myriad of reasons to be against inter-racial marriage: the best one possibly being that it creates offspring who will not neatly fit into a sociopolitical group and therefore will represent the beginning of a new one with all of its conflicting needs and hostility to out-groups.

    Beyond that, its isolating and unpleasant for the offspring.

    Creating new groups is pointless and counter to peace. We already have enough of them who are trying and failing to get along. Though, we do recognize the Jewish drive to stoke chaos and create new political armies to combat their White enemies, and so I understand the Semitic endorsement of inter-racial marriage outside of the Jewish group. You predictably conform with this pattern of anti-White hostility.

    Nick Funetes is selfless in that he knows that standing up for the correct, God determined order of the World will both promote morality and reduce conflict and suffering over the long term. All the while possibly working against his own procreative ambition. That's the perspective of a moral human being, and it stands in stark contrast with the Semitic perspective that is willing to destroy the World's Order and morality in order to reduce competition and therefore assure more Semitic procreation.

    Replies: @Corvinus, @MikeatMikedotMike

    Well stated regarding your points about the race mixing, and I would say that the bigger the observable differences are (like, most aptly, between Africans and Europeans) the more confused these mixed offspring are going to be, especially in a culture like that of the US that currently celebrates one of the races and vilifies the other.

  34. h/t Patrick

    I think the lesson is here that we have to refashion our content as “partisan right”.

    The word “c*nspiracy” can no longer be used. “I*entitar*an” is also verboten. I suggest “identity politics”. I don’t see how they can defeat “white” with an algorithm.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    @216

    File under :

    Who is this "they" you claim is trying to control your thoughts

  35. @216
    h/t Patrick

    https://twitter.com/mark_ledwich/status/1210743168246771716

    I think the lesson is here that we have to refashion our content as "partisan right".

    The word "c*nspiracy" can no longer be used. "I*entitar*an" is also verboten. I suggest "identity politics". I don't see how they can defeat "white" with an algorithm.

    Replies: @Rosie

    File under :

    Who is this “they” you claim is trying to control your thoughts

  36. @EliteCommInc.
    The problem with both gentlemen is that when it comes to tackling issues, they seem incapable attending to critiques of substance. And in my view,

    The Constitution matters (as do data sets and there most accurate rendering)

    dismissing it merely because it causes your position hurdles exposes just how shallow the thought process is regarding what is being advocated.


    They should at least have the courage to reject the founding principles and why the country should adopt some other standard.

    -----------------------------


    I will continue to reject the "populist" label. It's application was adopted by anyone who opposed the conservative turn back practices that benefit US citizens. I will speak for myself. I voted for the president for reasons that were decidedly policy oriented not merely on my emotional opposition against the alternative.

    Replies: @anon

    The Constitution matters

    To whom?

  37. @Jay Fink
    @Anonymous

    The one consolation is for the most part (with exceptions of course) the white women with black men are not attractive to me, they are often overweight or obese.

    Replies: @216, @Oblivionrecurs, @Anonymous

    Black men love overweight and boisterous blonde women with attitude. Absolutely love it

    • Replies: @iffen
    @Oblivionrecurs

    God has a way of creating a place for everyone; evening things out, if you will.

  38. @216
    @indocon

    Some of the leftist tilt of the Northeast is thanks to Puerto Ricans.

    The Hispanic "archetype" is a working class person of Mexican descent in the Southwest. But the picture is more complex than that.

    The Northeast is the most unionized region of the country, and the GOP's instinct is still to slash-and-burn the public sector.

    Even worse, the Northeast is loaded to the gills with universities, the graduates and employees of which hate the GOP with even more venom.

    Replies: @Oblivionrecurs

    Puerto Ricans are one of the largest demicrat voting blocs, depending how you feel on Brazilians they’re the most Dem Hispanic bloc.

  39. @John Gruskos
    The TPUSA conference featured the President of the United States, Senator Cruz, Ann Coulter, and the Project Veritas guy, as well as the usual menagerie of worthless neocons and grifters, and their videos still got less views than the "Groyper Leadership Conference" did.

    Replies: @Charles Pewitt

    The TPUSA conference featured the President of the United States, Senator Cruz, Ann Coulter, and the Project Veritas guy, as well as the usual menagerie of worthless neocons and grifters, and their videos still got less views than the “Groyper Leadership Conference” did.

    Trump and Teddy Cruz openly push nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and they refuse to deport the upwards of 30 million illegal alien invaders in the USA.

    Ann Coulter gets her grit from Kentucky and her German blood. I’d say something more nice about Coulter but she ain’t got no time for guys under 6 feet tall and she was once a supporter and booster for Mormon Mammonite Globalizer Romney. That tall dope in the White House that Coulter likes is a wife beater and a treasonous bastard who sides with the Chinese Communist Party and the Swamp City DC China First Lobby over the interests of the USA.

    The Project Veritas guy and the Neo-Conservatives and the Conservatism Inc. grifters are bought and paid for whores and they wouldn’t tell the truth unless you outbid their whoremasters.

    Trump and Teddy Cruz also put the interests of Israel ahead of the interests of the USA.

    The Jew billionaire GOP donors and the GOP Cheap Labor Faction and other business interests are grooming Tom Cotton and Josh Hawley and Dan Crenshaw to add to their kept politician whores such as Marco Rubio and Teddy Cruz and Lindsey Graham and others.

    The Groypers are smart enough to know that the Republican Party is a donor-controlled outfit that would rather lose elections than push the kinds of America First policies that regular Whites want.

    The answer is to destroy the Republican Party and vote for and support the new political party called WHITE CORE AMERICA.

    White Core America Immigration Policy Pledge:

    Immigration Moratorium Now!

    Deport All Illegal Alien Invaders Now!

  40. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jay Fink
    @Anonymous

    The one consolation is for the most part (with exceptions of course) the white women with black men are not attractive to me, they are often overweight or obese.

    Replies: @216, @Oblivionrecurs, @Anonymous

    That sounds like wishful thinking.

    “The kneegrows are only taking our worst women.”

    If you go to a tier 1 city like New York or LA you see many many of the hottest white women with a black guy on their arm.

    In fact I would say the majority of top tier white women in a big city have burned coal at some point.

    • Replies: @Marty T
    @Anonymous

    I live in a big blue city and the majority of white women I see with black guys are unattractive. I even see more attractive white women with Asians than with blacks.

  41. There are certain trends that are inevitable. Hopping on board those trends will be required by the Republican party in order to survive. The shrinking white majority will require outreach to working class whites, as you mentioned. Another inevitable trend is the end of America’s interventionist foreign policy. Britain reached a point in the nineteen twenties where their national debt was so large that half of all tax revenues went to paying interest on it. They had to abandon their policy of having the largest navy in the world and make major changes in their foreign policy. The U.S. is going to have to do the same thing.

    Trump was a big disappointment because his isolationist foreign policy didn’t lead to any cuts in military spending. I’ve worked for the army for 35 years and it’s business as usual for the military. If you pick up any of the conservative magazines like National Review they are still espousing the same tired old clichés about the need for a strong military.

    Foreign policy is just one example. What is needed is to just identify what are the things that can’t continue forever and craft policies that deal with the looming changes that are going to happen whether we want them to or not. Trump has been ineffective at that and if the Republicans want to have a future they need to do better.

  42. @Oblivionrecurs
    @Jay Fink

    Black men love overweight and boisterous blonde women with attitude. Absolutely love it

    Replies: @iffen

    God has a way of creating a place for everyone; evening things out, if you will.

  43. “The Constitution matters”

    To every single US citizen — everyone.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    @EliteCommInc.

    that's: every single US citizen — every one (US citizen).

  44. @216
    @indocon

    Probably easier to just have us all learn Russian and meme "Belarus or Bust" into reality.

    Replies: @indocon

    Well pilgrim I have already immigrated once and have no desire to do so one more time, it’s the USA or bust.

  45. @EliteCommInc.
    "The Constitution matters"


    To every single US citizen -- everyone.

    Replies: @EliteCommInc.

    that’s: every single US citizen — every one (US citizen).

  46. @Corvinus
    @Anonymous

    "Fuentes said on Milo’s show that he is against mixed race marriages."

    Considering that his descendants are from different racial stock, I would say he is being his normal posturing, hypocritical self.

    Fuentes was recently taken to task by the intensifying crabbiness of Alt Right leader Vox Day.

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/12/little-nicky-debate-challenge-take-three.html

    Replies: @Anon, @Audacious Epigone

    Would you say the same about the child of divorced parents who advocates for parents staying together to raise their children?

    I don’t take a hardline on the question, but it is important that prospective parents realize the potential issues surrounding parents and children who do not look like one another. That doesn’t mean it can’t work, but it can complicate things.

  47. @Anonymous
    @Jay Fink

    That sounds like wishful thinking.

    "The kneegrows are only taking our worst women."

    If you go to a tier 1 city like New York or LA you see many many of the hottest white women with a black guy on their arm.

    In fact I would say the majority of top tier white women in a big city have burned coal at some point.

    Replies: @Marty T

    I live in a big blue city and the majority of white women I see with black guys are unattractive. I even see more attractive white women with Asians than with blacks.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS