The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
The Death of a Citizen
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I associate the idea of being a citizen of the world with cosmopolitan SWPL types. It’s not an inaccurate association when they are compared with badwhites, but it’s a tendency more fully characteristic of the entire Fringe coalition than I would have guessed.

In 2014, the GSS asked respondents if they “feel more like a citizen of the world than of any country”. The following table shows the percentages of respondents who either disagreed or strongly disagreed with the sentiment. Thus the higher the percentage, the less globalist and more nationalist a group’s identification.

Another way to read “citizen of the world” in this context, though, is as someone with hostility to the concept of the United States as a unified political entity. As is often the case with broad survey questions like these, the list of potential responses is not as clarifying or exhaustive as we’d like them to be. I don’t identify much as a citizen of the United States but I identify even less as a citizen of the world. There simply isn’t an obvious response indicative of localism here. If the choice is dichotomous, though, I’m coming down as a citizen of the country rather than of the world:

Race %NotGlobCit
White 58.6
Black 36.7
Hispanic 36.8
Asian 37.2
Male 55.9
Female 50.4
18-29 40.5
30-44 54.2
45-64 54.9
65+ 58.8
Political orientation
Liberal 32.0
Moderate 50.0
Conservative 69.9
Educational attainment
Less than high school 31.2
High school grad 50.0
Some college 53.3
Bachelor’s degree 65.1
Graduate level 60.7
Native-born 54.9
Foreign-born 42.3
Social class
Lower 35.3
Working 47.4
Middle 62.2
Upper 48.6

The young, the non-white, the poorly educated, the lower classes, the foreign-born, the politically leftist–these are the people who don’t feel much attachment to the idea of being American citizens. Demography is destiny, and our destiny looks to be a disunited America. Remove 30 million, virtually all of whom fall into one of these groupings, and there might be a snowball’s chance in hell of avoiding that fate, but even then I doubt it.

GSS variables used: CITWORLD(1-3)(4-5), AGE(18-29)(30-44)(45-64)(65-89), RACECEN1(1)(2)(4-10)(15-16), CLASS, SEX, EDUC(0-11)(12)(13-15)(16-17)(18-20), POLVIEWS(1-2)(4)(6-7), BORN

(Republished from The Audacious Epigone by permission of author or representative)
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. The foreign born may be less of a problem than the indoctrination by the media, advertising, public schools and universities. I mean, people's diet consists almost entirely in the globalist universalist bull crap.

  2. Anonymous [AKA "The Way"] says:

    Start the WORLD!!!

  3. Anon,

    Yes, that distinction is hardly surprising, though the idea–a pretty dumb idea that I assume very few people actually believe to be true–that newly minted immigrants eagerly embrace their citizenship more enthusiastically than natives do is incorrect.

  4. I think the switcharound at Upper class levels, and to a lesser degree at Graduate vs Bachelor, is interesting.

    It suggests to me that thinking of yourself first and foremost as an American citizen is likely to be linked to a) actually being like the average citizen (you think of yourself as being part of a nation because you genuinely are like people in your nation) and b) peaking at just above average status (your life is going pretty well, so why not give the nation the benefit of the doubt?).

    Graphing this question against respondent income and wordsum (as a proxy for beneficial life outcomes) might be revealing as well.

    Age differences seem likely to link to wealth and race – more minorities and foreign born among youngers (and Whites are like a mere plurality among them) and wealth is lower for them.

  5. It's kind of a weird question in any case; citizen implies ownership to some extent. I'd rather just check an "other" box and write-in "subject of the crown".

  6. Very interesting. I find it especially ironic that the least educated would regard themselves as global citizens, since they would be the ones least likely to have a passport.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS