The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
Support for BLM by Race and Partisan Affiliation
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Support for the BLM movement is primarily partisan but is also racial in nature:

Hey now, the obvious still needs quantifying!

 
• Category: Culture/Society, Race/Ethnicity • Tags: BLM, Polling 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. How about if we multiply the proportion of, or raw number of, American in each bar by the support rating? By “we”, I mean you, A.E. Can you do that? That’d tell us where we stand.

    • Replies: @Audacious Epigone
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Not sure what you mean. Wouldn't that just give us the total population net support (which is +14)?

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

  2. This information would be informative if we could cross it with information about who thinks of BLM as a political vs a racial movement. Maybe it would break down the same.

  3. Graph just shows you how Democrats keep exploiting people of courage and good will, while Republicans keep pandering to terrified folks who think any change must always be for the worse. “Independents”, heck, they’re just caught in the middle, screaming “you’re not my dad, you can’t tell me what to do, I don’t owe nobody nothin’!”

  4. Hey now, the obvious still needs quantifying!

    It’s obvious to me that the Wall Street Journal editorial page is full of fat cat baby boomer globalizer boobs who have actively engaged in the destruction of the USA and they are determined to finish the job of racially and financially destroying the USA.

    The obvious answer to Black Lives Matter propaganda crud is that IT’S OKAY TO BE WHITE.

    It is obvious that something as seemingly innocuous as IT’S OKAY TO BE WHITE will not be repeated by any rancid Republican Party politician whore because those damn dirty GOP whores are gutless and nutless and heartless and vile beyond redemption.

    The answer to Black Lives Matter propaganda crud is to remove the current owners and controllers of all the mass media from power.

    Google, Facebook, ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox News, NY Times, WSJ, and all the rest need to be obliterated and all fat ass baby boomer Trumpy will do is to cut their taxes and Tweet some empty slop.

  5. Jared Kushner is all the reason you need to write in CHARLES PEWITT for USA president on November 3.

    Think you’ve had enough?

    Think you’ve had enough of Trump and the rancid treasonites in the Republican Party?

    Write in Charles Pewitt for USA president.

    Blacks are more criminally inclined than Whites — proportionally — and FBI crime statistics tell that tale pretty damn good!

  6. @Achmed E. Newman
    How about if we multiply the proportion of, or raw number of, American in each bar by the support rating? By "we", I mean you, A.E. Can you do that? That'd tell us where we stand.

    Replies: @Audacious Epigone

    Not sure what you mean. Wouldn’t that just give us the total population net support (which is +14)?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Audacious Epigone

    In EACH bar, A.E. so net support of white D's x people identifying* as white D's, then same for the other 11. Come to think of it, yeah since it's it's a sampling, of course those numbers could not come from your civiqs data. It'd have to be looked up elsewhere.

    Since this one is not really related to voting, I guess it could just be from some reliable source of how many white D's, ... black R's there are in the country.

    This would give the relative support in (people x intensity), which ought to mean something.


    .

    * Man, now this word has lost it's usefulness with this genderbending nonsense.

  7. @Audacious Epigone
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Not sure what you mean. Wouldn't that just give us the total population net support (which is +14)?

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman

    In EACH bar, A.E. so net support of white D’s x people identifying* as white D’s, then same for the other 11. Come to think of it, yeah since it’s it’s a sampling, of course those numbers could not come from your civiqs data. It’d have to be looked up elsewhere.

    Since this one is not really related to voting, I guess it could just be from some reliable source of how many white D’s, … black R’s there are in the country.

    This would give the relative support in (people x intensity), which ought to mean something.

    .

    * Man, now this word has lost it’s usefulness with this genderbending nonsense.

    • Thanks: Audacious Epigone
  8. I am reminded of the 90% of “conservative” blacks voting for Obama in 2008. What is it with blacks that causes them to prefer their own even when their own causes stupid, destructive actions that utterly destroys the black community? I struggle to think of any other high order mammal in nature that would do such a thing.

    • Replies: @Polynikes
    @Wyatt

    What was the percentage in ‘12 among conservative blacks. That may be more telling. McCain/Palin was an atrocious set of candidates by any measure.

    Replies: @Wyatt

  9. @Wyatt
    I am reminded of the 90% of "conservative" blacks voting for Obama in 2008. What is it with blacks that causes them to prefer their own even when their own causes stupid, destructive actions that utterly destroys the black community? I struggle to think of any other high order mammal in nature that would do such a thing.

    Replies: @Polynikes

    What was the percentage in ‘12 among conservative blacks. That may be more telling. McCain/Palin was an atrocious set of candidates by any measure.

    • Replies: @Wyatt
    @Polynikes

    It got even narrower. 8% or less.

  10. @Polynikes
    @Wyatt

    What was the percentage in ‘12 among conservative blacks. That may be more telling. McCain/Palin was an atrocious set of candidates by any measure.

    Replies: @Wyatt

    It got even narrower. 8% or less.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS