The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
States Ranked by SPM (Supplemental Poverty Measure) Rates
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

As a provincial in the hinterlands, the title of Thomas Frank’s What’s the Matter with Kansas? has been stuck in my craw since I first started blogging nearly a decade ago. It’s not due to a necessarily strong attachment to the state I call home, but to the presumption that being in a place like Manhattan–crowded, polluted concrete jungle surrounded by millions of status-striving lemmings who are renting spaces one-third the size of the house I own–is inherently a superior way to live. Some people thrive off being engrossed in the busy anonymity of an entirely artificial world, but not everyone does, nor is such an existence necessarily superior to a more settled, personable (and generally more materially comfortable) lifestyle.

That superciliousness is palpable in a book like Frank’s, in which the author sardonically argues that red-staters in flyover country vote against their own economic interests with both persistence and ignorance. Those pathetic retrogrades, how pitiable they are being manipulated so! Such an argument rests on the assumption that said flyover states are poor. Looking merely at nominal income statistics, there is such a case to be made. The real value of a dollar, though, is what you can get in return for it, and in flyover country that dollar goes a lot farther than it does in the boroughs.

Several years ago, Steve Sailer attempted to get a handle on monetary standard-of-livings by state using ACCRA’s cost-of-living index. That index isn’t perfect (at least not the free version) since state values are calculated by an unjustifiable equal weighting of participating cities with those not participating left entirely unaccounted for.

Census data from 2012 offer another way to approach the question, with what the august institution deems the “Supplemental Poverty Measure” (SPM–my thanks to MG for the heads up). Here are a few of the major differences in the way the official poverty measure and the SPM are computed:

The SPM adjusts for things like effective household size, housing costs (for which there is enormous geographic variation), taxes, etc.

The following table inversely ranks the 50 states plus DC by their SPMs. A visual representation of the same is subsequently presented. This fares better on the smell test than the official poverty rate does in terms of comparing and contrasting relatively poor and affluent states:

State SPM%
1) Iowa 8.6
2) North Dakota 9.2
2) Wyoming 9.2
4) Minnesota 9.7
5) Nebraska 9.8
6) Vermont 10.1
7) New Hampshire 10.2
8) South Dakota 10.6
9) Wisconsin 10.8
10) Maine 11.2
11) Kansas 11.5
12) Idaho 11.6
12) Utah 11.6
14) Montana 12.1
15) Washington 12.2
16) Missouri 12.4
17) Alaska 12.5
17) Connecticut 12.5
19) Pennsylvania 12.6
20) West Virginia 12.9
21) Ohio 13.2
22) Virginia 13.3
23) Maryland 13.4
23) Oklahoma 13.4
25) Alabama 13.5
25) Michigan 13.5
27) Kentucky 13.6
27) Rhode Island 13.6
29) Colorado 13.7
30) Massachusetts 13.8
31) Delaware 13.9
31) Oregon 13.9
33) Indiana 14.2
33) North Carolina 14.2
35) Illinois 15.2
36) New Jersey 15.5
36) Tennessee 15.5
38) South Carolina 15.8
39) Mississippi 16.1
39) New Mexico 16.1
41) Texas 16.4
42) Arkansas 16.5
43) Hawaii 17.3
44) New York 18.1
45) Georgia 18.2
46) Louisiana 18.5
47) Arizona 18.8
48) Florida 19.5
49) Nevada 19.8
50) District of Columbia 22.7
51) California 23.8

The darker the state, the higher the proportion of its impoverished residents:

Jack Cashill’s riposte, What’s the Matter with California?, does a better job than Frank’s book in identifying where the real economic–among others!–problems are. The Upper Midwest is the most materially comfortable part of the country, and as one moves in pretty much any direction away from it things more-or-less tend to get worse. Yes, the weather in that part of the US isn’t what most people consider optimal, especially those of the Sun variety. But that might be seen as a feature rather than a bug. The inverse correlation between the percentage of the population that is (non-Hispanic) white and its SPM rate is a staggering .81 (p = .0000000000001). Diversity is Strength! It’s also… poverty.

Additionally, SPM rates modestly inversely correlate (.37, p = .007) with Romney’s share of the 2012 presidential vote. Republican states are more egalitarian than Democratic states are, and, as a consequence, it could be cynically be argued, Democrats have a vested political interest in perpetuating inequality since they tend to do better the more economic inequality there is. Then again, one might think the GOP would have a similar interest in promoting economic equality, but alas. Don’t say the party doesn’t earn its stupid party sobriquet!

Finally, SPM rates correlate with a couple other unflattering characteristics of New York (or California, or DC, where Frank lives, for that matter) vis-a-vis Kansas: IQ (inversely at .67, p = .000000006) and population density (.39, p = .004).

(Republished from The Audacious Epigone by permission of author or representative)
Hide 8 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anonymous [AKA "Moyniham"] says:

    For some reason proximity to Canada does not help New York out much.

  2. Anonymous [AKA "Twoson"] says:

    What sailer deemed the sand states have a pretty poor showing. Arizona is especially bad given its characteristics. Surprisingly so.

  3. Twoson,

    I thought the same. I suppose it shouldn't be too surprising though–Arizona is a sort of second California. As much as its image may be of being in contrast to Cali, there is a lot of overlap.

  4. Anonymous [AKA "Blake H"] says:

    This is one of those posts that I think would be a welcome addition to your data section on the right-side of the main page.

  5. Californians like to brag that the rest of America is just following their wake, it's a bit horrifying to consider that they may be correct

  6. If you were able to examine on a county by county basis SPM vs Non-Hispanic White population percentage and SPM versus Romney vote percentage, the former figure would be a bit higher, though at 0.81 on a state by state basis, it's over the magic number of 0.80 meaning that it's perfect correlation for all intents and purposes in a social science sense, (0.81 is as good as 0.99), just like any credit score above 750 is essentially perfect, 751 is as good as 840, and I think the 0.37 figure for state SPM vs Romney percentage would be way higher.

  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS