The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
Perceived Political Biases of Social Media Platforms
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The following graph shows average perceived political biases of the major social media platforms by the public, computed by taking the percentages of each group who perceive social media as having a leftist bias and subtracting from that the percentages who perceive it having a rightist bias. Positive numbers thus indicate perceived liberal bias, negative numbers perceived conservative bias:

The social media giants are perceived to be calibrated precisely at the center of the Democrat distribution. Perspicacious public. Big Tech wanted Kamala Harris, not Bernie Sanders, after all.

 
• Category: Culture/Society, Ideology • Tags: Polling, Social Media 
Hide 12 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. This poll is another example of what a mean IQ of 85 means: a substantial number less than 70, which is retarded by definition. Literally retarded, as in “needs supervision to do more than tie their shoes” mental level.

    • Replies: @neutral
    @anon

    Even at retard levels, I struggle to see what more blacks would need to change their perception conservative bias. They are literally worshipped as god like beings, what can the tech tyrants do to increase their fawning of the black race?

    Replies: @John Regan, @216

  2. Shorter version:

    Social Media bias aligns perfectly … with Democrats.

  3. Sure, and the Soviet people wanted Stalin, not Trotsky.

  4. I’m with your average polled Democrat on this one. I perceive no bias. That’s probably just because I don’t participate in it though …

  5. @anon
    This poll is another example of what a mean IQ of 85 means: a substantial number less than 70, which is retarded by definition. Literally retarded, as in "needs supervision to do more than tie their shoes" mental level.

    Replies: @neutral

    Even at retard levels, I struggle to see what more blacks would need to change their perception conservative bias. They are literally worshipped as god like beings, what can the tech tyrants do to increase their fawning of the black race?

    • Replies: @John Regan
    @neutral

    While this won't apply to most blacks, maybe some of the respondents are Old Left economic Marxists, who bypass the issue of woke-ism and define "The Right" simply as pro-Big Business and anti-Humanity? By that definition, social media absolutely has an indisputable right wing bias.

    Of course, capitalism is really a left-wing ideology to begin with, designed specifically to destroy the organic communities and ways of life of traditional society (the true "Right"). But there are still all too many (on both sides of the political spectrum) who buy into the false dichotomies peddled by con artists like Bill Buckley or Charlie Kirk.

    Replies: @dfordoom

    , @216
    @neutral

    None of the Big Tech companies has a black executive in the C-Suite?

  6. @neutral
    @anon

    Even at retard levels, I struggle to see what more blacks would need to change their perception conservative bias. They are literally worshipped as god like beings, what can the tech tyrants do to increase their fawning of the black race?

    Replies: @John Regan, @216

    While this won’t apply to most blacks, maybe some of the respondents are Old Left economic Marxists, who bypass the issue of woke-ism and define “The Right” simply as pro-Big Business and anti-Humanity? By that definition, social media absolutely has an indisputable right wing bias.

    Of course, capitalism is really a left-wing ideology to begin with, designed specifically to destroy the organic communities and ways of life of traditional society (the true “Right”). But there are still all too many (on both sides of the political spectrum) who buy into the false dichotomies peddled by con artists like Bill Buckley or Charlie Kirk.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
    @John Regan


    maybe some of the respondents are Old Left economic Marxists, who bypass the issue of woke-ism and define “The Right” simply as pro-Big Business and anti-Humanity? By that definition, social media absolutely has an indisputable right wing bias.
     
    That's possible.

    Of course, capitalism is really a left-wing ideology to begin with, designed specifically to destroy the organic communities and ways of life of traditional society (the true “Right”).
     
    That just shows the uselessness of using terms like left and right.

    We need to abandon such terms. It's better to say that social media absolutely has an indisputable pro-capitalist bias. Although even that can be misleading since modern capitalism is not like your grandfather's capitalism. The current economic system is better described as globofascism.

    Replies: @Mark G.

  7. @neutral
    @anon

    Even at retard levels, I struggle to see what more blacks would need to change their perception conservative bias. They are literally worshipped as god like beings, what can the tech tyrants do to increase their fawning of the black race?

    Replies: @John Regan, @216

    None of the Big Tech companies has a black executive in the C-Suite?

  8. There’s been lots of talk of Who/Whom, but it also comes down to What/Why, or one mustn’t lose sight of the WHY in the blindsided pursuit of the WHAT. Of course, we need to nail down the WHAT, the facts of what’s really happening. But, in focusing solely on the WHAT, there’s the risk of overlooking the bigger problem of the WHY, or why do the elites who know the what(of what’s really happening) keep pretending they don’t know and push the big lie? Why the Lie?

    People like Heather MacDonald, Colin Flaherty(of “White Girls Bleed A Lot”), and Paul Kersey of SBPDL have detailed ad infinitum on the WHAT of black crime and social pathologies. They said it over and over and over and backed it with facts caught on video, recorded in statistics, and/or reported by local news. So, there is no way the elites don’t know the WHAT. They know. And blacks who live in the black community know the WHAT as well. They know most blacks are killed by blacks. And black leaders/elites know this too, the WHAT.

    If indeed the problem of the elites were ignorance and naivete, we could concentrate on the WHAT and keep hammering the nails of facts in the hope that the ruling elites will finally realize the truth of what’s really happening. But over the years, no amount of speaking the truth has done any good. The elites keep favoring lies over truth.
    There is no way Jews don’t know about the black reality. They saw what happened to New York from the 1960s to the early 1990s. And, there’s a good reason why Israel especially doesn’t want black migrants; Zionists know Africans are problematic. Jews know blacks are more muscular, aggressive, and impulsive. In private conversations among themselves and with goyim they trust, Jews will admit that 80% of America’s problems owe to blacks. (They’ll also admit Jews control the media.) So, they know privately but will not admit publicly. And when individual Jews enter media or government, they never speak the truth even though they know certain things to be absolutely true.

    So, at some point, we need to obsess less on the WHAT and focus more on the WHY. And on that score, David Duke(despite his checkered past) is actually better than most figures on the so-called Dissident Right. Dr. Duke, though kooky in certain respects, directs the focus on the fact of Jewish Supremacist Power and explains the WHY of the Jewish Lie. Duke knows the problem with the Jews and the cucked goy elites is not ignorance but malignance. Jews are for total power, and they regard Black Magic as an effective way to bait whites with ‘white guilt’ and hook them with jungle fever.

    Indeed, the Jewish Media and Elites are not suffering from the Big Ignorance but willfully indulging in the Big Lie because what matters most to them is money, power, prestige, and control than truth and justice. Jews value blacks as money-makers in sports and music industries controlled by Jews. Jews value black history/slavery as a gold mine of ‘white guilt’ that paralyzes white pride and agency, thereby turning whites into cuck-slaves of Jews and their allies, especially blacks and homos. Jews value black muscle to emasculate the white man into cuck-maggotry, thus rendering him even more servile. This way, the white man is cucked in both morality and manhood.

    Also, by having holy blacks as allies, Jews can prevent the formation of the Black-Palestinian Alliance. Why was MLK so valuable to Jews? Because, even as MLK championed racial equality in the US, he supported Jewish Supremacism in Palestine/Israel. He became holy for his struggle for justice in America but was also allied with Zionists. Thus, Jews could push the political equation: Equal Justice = Support for Israel.
    Mandela was a trickier matter for Jews because Israel was South Africa’s #1 ally whereas ANC was allied with PLO. But of course, Jews hedged their bets. Even though rich Jews worked with Afrikaners against the black majority and even though Apartheid South Africa and Zionist-Supremacist Israel were joined at the hip, there were also Jewish Communists like Joe Slovo who bet on the Black Horse in South Africa. So, when Apartheid finally ended, Jews could say to blacks, “You see, we Jews were on your side.” And Jews funneled so much cash to Mandela that he became chummy with Israel despite the fact that it had supported the Apartheid Regime and practices a far more brutal form of apartheid in the West Bank and Gaza. Of course, Jews must pay off blacks, and this isn’t cheap, but then, Jews rake in so much money from black sports/music that the whole operation pays for itself.

    It is time to focus less on the WHAT and more on the WHY. Indeed, the Power is mostly about the WHY than the WHAT. If we ponder the WHY, it’s obvious why the Power so often prefers the Lie over the Truth. The Power is all about maintaining its grip, and more often than not, the truth is usually more damaging to the Power. It’s like Elizabeth Holmes and other creeps at Theranos knew all about the WHAT, that they were pushing a fraud. So, WHY did they do it? Because they wanted the investments, profits, and adulation. No amount of facts would have convinced Holmes who only cared about How to serve the Why. Holmes was ultimately about her idolatrous apotheosis as the female Steve Jobs than about truth, health, saving lives, and etc. It was all about egotism. Likewise, the Sackler Family didn’t care about all those dead white goy lives, which were expendable. Sackers surely knew that opioids were devastating white working class Americans. But they didn’t care as long as they got the money, and with that money, they could buy moral prestige as famous philanthropists of the arts and good works.

    Then, it’s so easy to understand the WHY of Black Lives Matter. We can detail the WHAT of black crime and how BLM is built on a pack of lies, but BLM doesn’t care about facts because it is really motivated by ethnocentrism of black self-worship. Blacks, like Jews and Homos, are perfect and never to be blamed. In the Bible, God is perfect and whatever He does or whatever happens can NEVER be blamed on Him. The blame must always fall on systemically sinful humanity. In our secular age, Jews control the gods, and the three holies are Jews, blacks, and homos. We must revere them as near-perfect, and so, even when bad things happen around them due to their bad behavior, the fault is not with them but with us for having failed them. So, if blacks loot and burn down cities, it is no fault of their own but their righteous punishment and smiting of us who didn’t work hard enough to create a social order worthy of their divine presence.

    Indeed, the fact that blacks, Jews, and progs resort to yapping about ‘systemic racism’ is they know BLM is factually unsound. The statistics invalidate BLM as facts tell another story: Too many blacks kill other blacks and non-blacks as well. So, to justify BLM, they frame the protests, riots, and vandalism in the larger perspective of the history and ‘systemic racism’. Using this logic, anyone can justify anything. I can rob & steal and justify my crime as a rebellion against ‘systemic oppression’ since most of history has been about the powerful exploiting the powerless. I can invoke Cain & Abel and justify whatever I do as a rebellion against the sinfulness of humanity, i.e. since all of humanity has been so brutal and dark, I must be too in order to ‘survive’.
    It’s a general rule that people invoke ‘heaven’ and make highfalutin claims because facts on the ground go against them. If a black steals from you, the facts favor you and incriminate the black. So, the black invokes HISTORY to justify his deed: “Heaven’s on my side, so whatever I do, no matter how devilish, has the blessing from above.” (Hunter Biden, Jussie Smollett, and BLM thugs all have one thing in common. In an order where Jews control the gods, them three stooges got new heaven on their side, so whatever they do can’t be wrong.)
    Any factual investigation of the Jewish-Palestinian Conflict will favor Palestinians, a wholly innocent people who did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING but were driven off their lands by Jewish Immigrant-invaders backed by Western Imperialists and even the Soviet Union. Since facts of the matter favor Palestinians, Jews invoke the Big History of the Holocaust to justify the theft. Never mind Palestinians had nothing to do with WWII or the Shoah, and furthermore, Israel was created AFTER the defeat of Nazi Germany, which means Jews no longer faced extermination in Europe. In the modern era, Jews won the war of worming-heaven with serpent’s eggs of the new trinity of Jew-hova, Homo-mania, and Afrotheosis.

    BLM is like a holy war, and it has no use of facts or moral consistency, but then, the same could be said of the Crusades. Christianity is about love, peace, forgiveness, and pacifism. Jesus never told anyone to pick up swords and fight wars and build empires built on skulls. So, why did the Crusaders and later European Imperialists wave the banner of Jesus while carrying out massive acts of violence that clearly went against Jesus’s teachings? Because they were really about power and pride than anything else. They didn’t care about the WHAT of their deeds. Factually, they were acting against Jesus’s teachings. But, it didn’t matter because they were into power, glory, wealth, and prestige. So, Jesus mattered less as teacher than as symbolism. He was used to bless and sanctify the power and wealth of the West. This way, Westerners could go around the world conquering, plundering, slaughtering, and pillaging. As long as they carried the banner and cross of Jesus wherever they went, they could make believe they were the holy warriors of justice and love.
    BLM works much the same way. Blacks are most obsessed with pride and power that count for more than any actual black lives. Just like dead soldiers are the price for victory and glory, more dead blacks due to BLM are the worthy cost of something better: Negro godhood. More dead blacks are just casualties of a righteous war as far as many blacks are concerned. This is especially true of black elites as they won’t be the ones doing the dying. From where they’re perched, they will have gained immense prestige thanks to BLM sacralization of the Negro. (By the way, if blacks don’t care about More Dead Blacks, why should the Dissident Right make a fuss about the actual WHAT? Why should they counter BLM with real-black-lives-matter that despairs of how BLM-led policies have led to more deaths among blacks? If blacks don’t care about their actual dead and, furthermore, hate and attack your kind, the LAST THING you should be doing is worrying about more dead blacks.)

    But then, ADL, AIPAC, and SPLC operate much like BLM. They are controlled by people who secretly know the WHAT. They are no dummies or ignoramuses. They know the truth about black criminality. They also know the facts of how Jews stole land from the Palestinians and are ruthlessly plotting to wreak more havoc in the Middle East to ensure Jewish-Zionist supremacism. Those reasons are WHY they do what they do. As the WHAT undermines their WHY, they use their near-monopoly of media and institutions to push the Big Lie.

    Why does the Jewish-controlled Deep State operate as it does? Now, when it comes to small matters, the FBI probably does really good work. There’s sure to be far less politics involved in going after lesser crooks and criminals. But higher up the FBI, the issue of justice becomes intermeshed with the ways of power. People-of-Power or POP don’t want the justice to apply to them, and as they buy the politicians who appoint the top heads of FBI, CIA, and other elite institutions, the upper echelons of the Deep State operate solely on the HOW to serve the WHY than on the facts of the WHAT. Indeed, why is it that Jonathan Pollard was released and allowed a hero’s welcome in Israel? How come Arnon Milchan can walk around freely in the US and serve as king-maker when he admitted to stealing nuclear secrets for Israel? Where is the FBI and the CIA?

    It’s possible that many in the Dissident Right prefer to discuss the WHAT than the WHY because it’s less risque. By hammering on the WHAT, they can pretend that the Power is simply ignorant, benighted, or clueless. So, they go on and on with statistics like number-crunchers. They are little more than social accountants. They don’t want to deal with the WHY because they would have to focus on Jewish Power and explain why the Jews who know the truth willfully push the lie to maintain their control and power. Going there, one would be accused of ‘antisemitism’ and worse. But, this is dishonest and even cowardly. No matter how much truth you speak, you are dishonest if you keep pretending that the enemy simply doesn’t know when, in fact, you damn well know that he damn well knows but is willfully pushing the lie for power-sake.

    Suppose there is Bob and Bill. Bill keeps letting the pitbull out, and it attacks Bob. So, Bob explains to Bill that pitbulls are dangerous and can hurt people real bad; therefore, Bill should stop letting the pitbull out. Now, Bob would be right to speak the truth to Bill if indeed Bill didn’t know that pitbulls are dangerous. That way, there’s a good chance that Bill will realize the truth and no longer let the pitbull out.
    But, suppose Bill lets the dog out repeatedly and Bob gets attacked over and over. By this point, it should be obvious to Bob that Bill knows that pitbulls are dangerous, is feigning ignorance and willfully letting it out for the express purpose of having Bob attacked and bloodied. But if, after so many attacks, Bob is still discussing the WHAT of the dangers posed by pitbulls than redirecting his focus on the WHY of Bill’s viciousness and sadism, he is pretty useless regardless of the facts he lays out. He can gather all the facts and statistics about pitbulls and lay them at Bill’s feet, but Bill will keep letting the pitbull out to attack Bob because the WHY that really motivates him is to see Bob get hurt and humiliated.

    It’s like the scene in Federico Fellini’s AMARCORD. The student is feigning ineptitude just to mock the teacher in front of the class. The teacher’s earnest effort is all for naught in face of motivation whose sole purpose is to make him look ridiculous. Too many on the Dissident Right are earnestly arguing with bad faith actors. Don’t waste good facts on bad faith.

    So, whether it’s BLM or the bogus War on Terror, we need to focus less on the WHAT of the facts and more on the WHY of Jewish Power(without whose media-and-money-support, BLM wouldn’t be possible). At this point, an honest assessment of the political psychology of Jewish Power and the Deep State will be more useful than all the facts and data we can stack up. Indeed, Juliann Assange and Edward Snowden can tell you that. What did they do but reveal the facts and raw data of how the Deep State really operates? They were titans of the WHAT. So, how did the Deep State and Jewish Power react to this mountain of facts? They did everything to cover it up and destroy the lives of whistle-blowers. It’s because the Deep State isn’t about truth or justice but about the Power guarding its power to do as it pleases. The WHY directs the Deep State to focus on the HOW to keep the power than any other consideration. So, less about What’s Happening than Why Is It Happening.

  9. @John Regan
    @neutral

    While this won't apply to most blacks, maybe some of the respondents are Old Left economic Marxists, who bypass the issue of woke-ism and define "The Right" simply as pro-Big Business and anti-Humanity? By that definition, social media absolutely has an indisputable right wing bias.

    Of course, capitalism is really a left-wing ideology to begin with, designed specifically to destroy the organic communities and ways of life of traditional society (the true "Right"). But there are still all too many (on both sides of the political spectrum) who buy into the false dichotomies peddled by con artists like Bill Buckley or Charlie Kirk.

    Replies: @dfordoom

    maybe some of the respondents are Old Left economic Marxists, who bypass the issue of woke-ism and define “The Right” simply as pro-Big Business and anti-Humanity? By that definition, social media absolutely has an indisputable right wing bias.

    That’s possible.

    Of course, capitalism is really a left-wing ideology to begin with, designed specifically to destroy the organic communities and ways of life of traditional society (the true “Right”).

    That just shows the uselessness of using terms like left and right.

    We need to abandon such terms. It’s better to say that social media absolutely has an indisputable pro-capitalist bias. Although even that can be misleading since modern capitalism is not like your grandfather’s capitalism. The current economic system is better described as globofascism.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
    @dfordoom


    We need to abandon such terms. It’s better to say that social media absolutely has an indisputable pro-capitalist bias. Although even that can be misleading since modern capitalism is not like your grandfather’s capitalism. The current economic system is better described as globofascism.

     

    That's a useful distinction. Modern socialism is not like your grandfather's socialism either. The base of support for socialist parties back in the old days were the big industrial labor unions. Those old time labor union leaders were often socially conservative, patriotic and didn't back large scale immigration. Grandfather's capitalism and grandfather's socialism created a societal consensus that the goal of public policy was a large middle class and a small welfare safety net to take care of people like small children and the elderly who were unable to care for themselves. This welfare state would also provide temporary assistance for those who had lost a job or women trying to flee an abusive husband.

    This had replaced the 19th century era where the U.S. was becoming wealthier but you had high levels of income inequality. It probably lasted from the end of World War I up until the late sixties. From 1970 to the present you once again have increasing inequality but this is worse than the 19th century version because, unlike then, you also have little economic growth. The right has changed but so has the left. The big industrial labor unions have been replaced by big government employee labor unions as the base of the Democrat party. Many of these government employees have been through college and indoctrinated in the new woke leftism.
  10. @dfordoom
    @John Regan


    maybe some of the respondents are Old Left economic Marxists, who bypass the issue of woke-ism and define “The Right” simply as pro-Big Business and anti-Humanity? By that definition, social media absolutely has an indisputable right wing bias.
     
    That's possible.

    Of course, capitalism is really a left-wing ideology to begin with, designed specifically to destroy the organic communities and ways of life of traditional society (the true “Right”).
     
    That just shows the uselessness of using terms like left and right.

    We need to abandon such terms. It's better to say that social media absolutely has an indisputable pro-capitalist bias. Although even that can be misleading since modern capitalism is not like your grandfather's capitalism. The current economic system is better described as globofascism.

    Replies: @Mark G.

    We need to abandon such terms. It’s better to say that social media absolutely has an indisputable pro-capitalist bias. Although even that can be misleading since modern capitalism is not like your grandfather’s capitalism. The current economic system is better described as globofascism.

    That’s a useful distinction. Modern socialism is not like your grandfather’s socialism either. The base of support for socialist parties back in the old days were the big industrial labor unions. Those old time labor union leaders were often socially conservative, patriotic and didn’t back large scale immigration. Grandfather’s capitalism and grandfather’s socialism created a societal consensus that the goal of public policy was a large middle class and a small welfare safety net to take care of people like small children and the elderly who were unable to care for themselves. This welfare state would also provide temporary assistance for those who had lost a job or women trying to flee an abusive husband.

    This had replaced the 19th century era where the U.S. was becoming wealthier but you had high levels of income inequality. It probably lasted from the end of World War I up until the late sixties. From 1970 to the present you once again have increasing inequality but this is worse than the 19th century version because, unlike then, you also have little economic growth. The right has changed but so has the left. The big industrial labor unions have been replaced by big government employee labor unions as the base of the Democrat party. Many of these government employees have been through college and indoctrinated in the new woke leftism.

    • Agree: dfordoom, Dissident
  11. Mossberg has a new web site up. He says Zukerberg might as well be blinking “t-o-r-t-u-r-e” in Morris code while before congress.

    I think he is right. Big business did not suddenly become woke, as in a true conversion. Big business used to not piss off a major fraction of its customers for some useless social preening. It kept its personal preferences private the better to get customers with different prefences. But now the US has passed the event horizon of the black hole US government. We are all in the gravity well of the US government, which is all powerful.

    Zukerberg and all big business is trying not to be the first person to stop clapping after Comrade Stalin spoke. They are all on board demonstrating that they are for whatever Washington is for at the moment, and if Washington changes their mind they are for that too, more than the next guy.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
    @scrivener3


    Zukerberg and all big business is trying not to be the first person to stop clapping after Comrade Stalin spoke. They are all on board demonstrating that they are for whatever Washington is for at the moment, and if Washington changes their mind they are for that too, more than the next guy.
     
    I think it varies. Some Woke Capitalists are just trying to keep in good with the current regime. Some are afraid of bad publicity if they don't cheer loudly enough for SJE/Wokeist issues. And some are True Believers.

    As I've said many times I don't think the elite is monolithic. They're all vermin but they're different types of vermin, with slightly differing agendas. They're all greedy and selfish and vicious but their motivations vary.
  12. @scrivener3
    Mossberg has a new web site up. He says Zukerberg might as well be blinking "t-o-r-t-u-r-e" in Morris code while before congress.

    I think he is right. Big business did not suddenly become woke, as in a true conversion. Big business used to not piss off a major fraction of its customers for some useless social preening. It kept its personal preferences private the better to get customers with different prefences. But now the US has passed the event horizon of the black hole US government. We are all in the gravity well of the US government, which is all powerful.

    Zukerberg and all big business is trying not to be the first person to stop clapping after Comrade Stalin spoke. They are all on board demonstrating that they are for whatever Washington is for at the moment, and if Washington changes their mind they are for that too, more than the next guy.

    Replies: @dfordoom

    Zukerberg and all big business is trying not to be the first person to stop clapping after Comrade Stalin spoke. They are all on board demonstrating that they are for whatever Washington is for at the moment, and if Washington changes their mind they are for that too, more than the next guy.

    I think it varies. Some Woke Capitalists are just trying to keep in good with the current regime. Some are afraid of bad publicity if they don’t cheer loudly enough for SJE/Wokeist issues. And some are True Believers.

    As I’ve said many times I don’t think the elite is monolithic. They’re all vermin but they’re different types of vermin, with slightly differing agendas. They’re all greedy and selfish and vicious but their motivations vary.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS