The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
Modest Brown Slowdown
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

++Disclaimer++The 2015 data assigns a racial/ethnic classification to 99.7% of all recorded births, while the 2016 data only assigns one to 97.0% of all recorded births. I am unsure why the discrepancy is so large between the two years, but it creates the appearance of a larger decline in births by race/ethnicity across the board than actually exists in terms of total births. There was a 0.9% decline in the absolute number of births between 2015 and 2016.

The following table and graph show the change in Hispanic births from 2015 to 2016, by state (for whites see here and for blacks see here). Mixed-race births are not included in these counts:

State %▲
1) West Virginia +14.5
2) South Dakota +13.4
3) New Hampshire +9.1
4) Alabama +6.7
5) Ohio +6.4
6) Kentucky +4.5
7) Connecticut +4.2
8) South Carolina +3.9
9) Mississippi +3.3
10) Washington +2.9
11) Florida +2.8
12) Massachusetts +2.7
13) Tennessee +2.7
14) Rhode Island +2.6
15) Missouri +2.3
16) Colorado +2.1
17) Pennsylvania +2.1
18) Oklahoma +2.0
19) Iowa +1.5
20) District of Columbia +1.5
21) North Carolina +1.5
22) Arkansas +1.4
23) Nevada +1.3
24) Utah +1.1
25) Maryland +1.1
26) Wyoming +1.0
27) North Dakota +0.9
28) Virginia +0.8
29) Georgia +0.7
30) Nebraska +0.7
31) Michigan +0.5
32) Minnesota +0.4
33) Alaska +0.1
34) Kansas +0.0
35) Hawaii (0.3)
36) Oregon (0.6)
United States (0.7)
37) Idaho (0.8)
38) Arizona (0.9)
39) Wisconsin (1.5)
40) Texas (1.8)
41) New York (2.0)
42) California (2.3)
43) Indiana (2.5)
44) Louisiana (2.7)
45) New Jersey (2.8)
46) Vermont (2.9)
47) Illinois (3.7)
48) Montana (4.4)
49) Maine (5.2)
50) New Mexico (6.1)
51) Delaware (6.6)

 

Most states saw a year-over-year increase, but nationally the number of Hispanic births in 2016 declined modestly from 2015 on account of both California and Texas, together containing nearly half the country’s total Hispanic population, experiencing larger birth declines than the rest of the US.

A couple of noticeable trends are visible–fewer births in the highly Hispanic Southwest and more births in the South. While white and black births in Alaska and Hawaii are in free fall, Hispanic births are steady in the country’s non-contiguous states.

(Republished from The Audacious Epigone by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Arguably the biggest demographic shift of the last decade has been the convergence of White and Hispanic fertility rates, in 2006, Hispanic fertility was 51% higher then White fertility, 1.9 vs 2.86, by 2015, the difference was down to 21%, 1.75 vs 2.12, a radical change.

  2. Annatar II,

    Yes, it really is something. Someone on twitter directed me to TFRs from 2007 to 2014. It's staggering just how much they've dropped in less than a decade in the US. We are basically at Western European levels now. I'm in this orbit, and it caught me off guard.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS