The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
GSS Respondent Interview Comprehension Over Time
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In response to the previous post, Steve Sailer suggested the slight but steady rise over time in the percentage of GSS respondents deemed to have “good” comprehension of the interview questions asked them could be an illustration of the Flynn effect at work. The following graph quantifies the rise. The value displayed is derived by taking the percentage of respondents judged to have “poor” comprehension and subtracting it from the percentage assessed as having good comprehension. The middling assessment (“fair”) is left neutral:


There’s a bit of apparently random variation from year to year (most conspicuously the ‘spike’ in 1985), but the general trend is upward until 2006, the first year those not fluent in English were included in the survey. The slide beginning after 2004 might be a result of the Spanish version of the Wordsum test being more difficult than its English equivalent, but it is more likely simply a consequence of the fact that among people residing in the US, thoseable to converse in the Anglo-Frisian subgroup are sharper than those who unable to .

Steve also wrote the following:

It would be interesting to see who is overrated and underrated relative to their test scores. My impression is that people in New York City seem mentally quicker than people elsewhere. Some of that is actually mean IQ difference, but some of it is different affect.

To calculate predicted comprehension by geography, I took the percentages of each of the five intelligence categories (wordsum scores of 0-3, 4-5, 6, 7-8, and 9-10) by region and determined what each region’s mean comprehension would be if that region’s five groups showed good comprehension at the national rate. The following table shows how respondents in each region were assessed by interviewers relative to what their wordsum scores alone predicted their aggregate assessments would be. Positive values indicate respondents being assessed as having better comprehension than wordsum performance predicts they should have (they appear sharper than they actually are); negative values indicate respondents being assessed as having worse comprehension than wordsum predicts (they appear duller than they actually are):

Region
East North Central (IL, IN, MI, OH, WI) 1.1
New England (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT) 0.6
Pacific (AK, CA, HA, OR, WA) 0.4
Mountain (AZ, CO, ID, MT, NV, NM, UT, WY) 0.3
South Atlantic (DE, DC, FL, GA, MD, NC, SC, VA, WV) 0.2
West North Central (KS, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD) 0.1
Middle Atlantic (NJ, NY, PA) (0.3)
East South Central (AL, KY, MI, TN) (1.1)
West South Central (AR, LA, OK, TX) (1.3)

The variances are extremely modest, to the extent that the table should be taken very lightly. There is no way to tell if individual states within each of the nine regions are representated proportionally to their respective populations. Further, the interviewers presumably tend to be from the areas they are conducted the surveys in, so should conceivably already have already factored in any artificial increase or decrease in perceived intelligence by differences in affect.

Despite all this, the results still strike me as having some face validity. When I come across someone with a distinct upper midwestern accent, it creates a bit of a competency halo, in the same way British accents do. Southern drawls, on the other hand, have the opposite effect. The Boston affect does it for me (though it also makes me wary–must be too much Simpsonian influence growing up), yet so does the rapidity of the New Yorker’s word delivery. Consequently, the Middle Atlantic’s position feels the most out of place. But I have NYC in mind, to the exclusion of the bucolic expanse between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.

GSS variables used: WORDSUM, COMPREND, REGION

(Republished from The Audacious Epigone by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 5 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Nice finding. I wonder how that looks by age and cohort. Does comprehension go up as people age, like vocab? Do people born in the 80s have the best interview comprehension?

    The WORDSUM measure shows an almost opposite Flynn Effect, with white vocab highest for those born in the 1950s, and those born in the 30s,40s,60s, and 70s having lower scores. Those born in the 1970s appear to score worse than those born in the 1940s.

  2. Jason,

    Definitely worth taking a look at, and I will.

    There is hope in Ron's post, though. The smartest decade–those born in the 50s–did marginally worse on wordsum when they were in their twenties than my (our?) decade did in theirs. Hopefully we keep pace going forward.

  3. "with white vocab highest for those born in the 1950s"

    Granted, we're insufferable to have around, but you all are going to miss us Baby Boomers when we're gone.

  4. "you all are going to miss us Baby Boomers when we're gone."

    Nah, we won't wait till you are gone. We will miss you when you retire and the load then shifts to us!

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    [url=http://tinyurl.com/y9qxher][img]http://i069.radikal.ru/1001/35/75e72b218708.jpg[/img][/url]

    Related keywords:
    prepare Tramadol capsules for intravenous injection
    purchase Tramadol
    lowest cost Tramadol
    buy cheap overnight Tramadol
    buy cheap Tramadol here
    buy cheapest Tramadol price online without prescription
    Tramadol acetomimophen
    Tramadol 50 mg tabs
    [url=http://www.zazzle.com/AlexanderBlack]cash for Tramadol [/url]
    [url=http://seobraincenter.ru]http://seobraincenter.ru[/url]
    Tramadol medication
    Tramadol online pharmacy
    pharmacy salary tech buy Tramadol now
    Tramadol controversy
    buy no perscription Tramadol
    Tramadol controversy
    best price for Tramadol generic Tramadol

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS