The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
Devon's Doing Less of It Now, Too
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

After this, I’m off the fecundity kick for awhile, promise. In the following graph, GSS respondents are broken up into five categories; Really Smarts (wordsum score of 9-10, comprising 13% of the population), Pretty Smarts (7-8, 26%), Normals (6, 22%), Pretty Dumbs (4-5, 27%), and Really Dumbs (0-3, 12%). The average number of children middle-aged adults in each category have are shown by year. To avoid English language fluency issues, only those born in the US are included:


No surprises. There is some expected year-to-year bouncing around due to randomness, but the societal patterns are clear: Those on the left side of the IQ spectrum have more children than those on the right side do, and everybody has been having fewer and fewer of them over the last four decades.

GSS variables used: WORDSUM(0-3)(4-5)(6)(7-8)(9-10), YEAR, BORN(1), AGE(36-62), CHILDS

(Republished from The Audacious Epigone by permission of author or representative)
 
• Tags: Fertility, GSS, Idiocracy, IQ 
Hide 7 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Audacious,

    Shoot me an email: I have some data that I think will interest you (I can't find your email on here).

  2. Embryonic selection would solve the dysgenic problem very quickly.

  3. Mark,

    I have it listed in my blogger profile now, sorry. It's [email protected]

    Underachiever,

    "Would", yes. "Will", also yes?

  4. Dear Audacious,

    "[email protected]"???

    Do Hulk Hogan and The Body Ventura know?

    I sense a beat down coming.

    Yours,

    Bob

  5. Bob,

    I'm not sure what you're referring to. A little help, if you would.

  6. It looks almost as if human adaptation to the modern environment is starting to show. Those fertility numbers may start increasing again.

  7. Audacious,

    If any country offers it, I would go there to have kids. Furthermore, if one country does it (such as China), every other country would almost be forced to do it. I think it likely that this would spark a national debate at the very least

    The resistance to this comes from both the blank-slate, anti-eugenicist left and the bible-thumping right who don't want scientists to play God.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS