Joe Sobran famously quipped “in their mating and migratory habits, liberals are indistinguishable from members of the Ku Klux Klan.” That observation, astute for its time, is covered in dust and growing moldy. The percentages of whites, by age, who have a non-white spouse or partner:

Just 1-in-20 young white Republicans are flirting with the idea of having children who don’t look like them. Have a white pill, then.
It’s often observed that, absent immigration, political conservatism would win in the US because white Republicans have more kids than white Democrats do.
We can take that a step further. Given the zeitgeist’s flight-from-white and non-white one-drop rule, the 1.2 children resulting from white leftist miscegenation will identify almost without exception as non-white. Due to the heritability of political beliefs, this will have the effect of ‘purging’ the most racially-unaware and racially-masochistic whites from whiteness as it is culturally understood. The anti-white hatred dial will be turned up that much faster but the remaining whites will be less susceptible to self-hatred than whites in the current year are.
The clarification before the storm.

RSS



I WOULD NOT COUNT ON THIS, BUT ON THAT.
The differences are really small, and the way the Jewish controlled media promotes miscegenation, I would not count on it to save the white race.
Whites need to marry whites early and have many kids—that will make a bigger difference.
But Judaists are waking up and realizing they have been scammed by their Rabbis.
Here is one:
Honest Jewish man upset that Exodus story and “Jews were slaves” story is fake and does not approve of Judaists defaming innocent Egyptians:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/staks-rosch/the-biblical-exodus-story-is-fiction_b_1408123.html
Therefore, they are getting out of Judaism:
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-report-intermarriage-threatenes-u-s-jewry-s-future-1.5482043
I am sure they also do not want anything to do with evil alienists like Soros, Sarah Silverman, Schumer and the lying scamming NYTs.
Who wrote that headline, Stormy Daniels?
Is there a gender breakdown?
Almost what I was thinking: What percentage have a spouse of different gender?
Meanwhile, back on the ranch….
“Minnesota Woman”
So she didn’t use a seat belt or close the car door. The miracle is that she was using a baby seat–they don’t have those back in Minnesota, where “Minnesota Woman” is from.
More news about America which isn’t reported in America:
In the second case, the real tragedy is that the White Devils who pressured and manipulated the boys into a situation obviously not of their own making have not yet been arrested.Replies: @Trevor H.
They, their mamas, and all their brothers and sisters should be summarily shipped to Monrovia.
Has this graph accounted for what percentage of those people have any partner at all?
For example, since only 30% of Millennials cohabit with a partner (is that the definition for having a partner?) would the 5% not more accurately represent 1 in 6 not 1 in 20? That would also make Democrats 1 in 2 and therefore it 1 in 3 overall, given a 50/50 partisan split.
The conclusions one can draw from the above, for America's identity centred politics, are very big and cut in many ways.
For example, since only 30% of Millennials cohabit with a partner (is that the definition for having a partner?) would the 5% not more accurately represent 1 in 6 not 1 in 20? That would also make Democrats 1 in 2 and therefore it 1 in 3 overall, given a 50/50 partisan split.Replies: @Tyrion 2, @Audacious Epigone
Further to the post above, the graph does defines “partner” as “living with”. It is therefore only 30% of Millennials and strongly suggests that 1 in 3 matings involving white Millennials also involves a partner of another race/ethnicity. This is very big. It also affects more than 1 in 3 given that people have siblings they are close to, best friends and cousins and so on.
The conclusions one can draw from the above, for America’s identity centred politics, are very big and cut in many ways.
I don’t think we need to investigate the facts further. The man who first approaches the vibrant toddler in the first video looks to be a person of non-color. Obviously he is trying to kidnap the girl. He needs to be locked up for life.
In the second case, the real tragedy is that the White Devils who pressured and manipulated the boys into a situation obviously not of their own making have not yet been arrested.
In the second case, the real tragedy is that the White Devils who pressured and manipulated the boys into a situation obviously not of their own making have not yet been arrested.Replies: @Trevor H.
Wow, you are a pro at this! (Tips hat)
Even if they’re non-white, they’re not necessarily lost to the pro-white cause. The key is to get them to identify as (a) anti-anti-white (b) anti-black – even if they’re “black” by one-drop standards. Pro-whites need to use the fact that people the world over prefer to distance themselves from association with blackness, even in cases where their blackness is quite apparent.
Such a turn from anti-white, pro-black sympathies to anti-anti-white (perhaps even pro-white), anti-black sympathies among the general public would be tremendously useful to pro-whites, allowing us to make our racial case in an environment receptive to – or at least tolerant of – implicitly, and perhaps even explicitly, pro-white speech. Gone would be the automatic, reflexive deference to black grievances, replaced by a widely held assumption that pro-white talking points are generally true and fair.
Why the focus on anti-blackness? Because blacks are by far the easiest race to rally against. No race on earth has anything to gain by sharing living space with blacks; all have a great deal to lose. In a world in which blacks will soon become the most populous racial group, and begin rapidly radiating out of Africa, the undesirability of blacks will all of a sudden become a very important political consideration. Pro-whites need to prepare for this eventuality, and turn it to our advantage.
At the top of the chart is says …”a spouse or partner of a different race or ethnicity.” Is the mention of ethnicity there to only include Hispanics? If ethnicity was being considered, it would be certainly much higher as various White ethnicities (e.g. German Americans and English Americans) marry one another at high rates.
The differences are really small, and the way the Jewish controlled media promotes miscegenation, I would not count on it to save the white race.
Whites need to marry whites early and have many kids—that will make a bigger difference.
But Judaists are waking up and realizing they have been scammed by their Rabbis.
Here is one:
Honest Jewish man upset that Exodus story and “Jews were slaves” story is fake and does not approve of Judaists defaming innocent Egyptians:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/staks-rosch/the-biblical-exodus-story-is-fiction_b_1408123.html
Therefore, they are getting out of Judaism:
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-report-intermarriage-threatenes-u-s-jewry-s-future-1.5482043
I am sure they also do not want anything to do with evil alienists like Soros, Sarah Silverman, Schumer and the lying scamming NYTs.Replies: @Shawn Returns
We will always have the Amish! Their disdain for technology cocoons them. They have a high birthrate. They have large families. If Whites become a small minority in the USA they are sitting ducks though.
The poll says partner of “different race or ethnicity”. Hence, a Sicilian dating a Latino is dating a “different race or ethnicity”. I suspect a liberal is more likely to claim their relationship is “mixed” than a conservative, though the mating results are probably similar (except that the conservative is possibly more likely to be rural, and have less choice in exotic partners). Given that most American “whites” are mutts with some smattering of Northern European ancestry, most “white” relationships probably involve mixed ethnicity (German/English with Swede or Irish/English with French).
In other words, its meaningless except as a measure of attitude, intended to provoke the defenders of “whiteness” and intended to reassure the enemies of “whiteness” that they are conforming to the ark of history. Remember 1/2020th makes you Native American in liberal land, so Elizabeth Warren’s husband is crossing the “race line”. The real question is how to get those dissident right folks to swear off the East Asian chicks.
Appalachians are clearly an ethnic group, but not identified as such. Most other sub-white identifiers are of decreased political salience. Recall when Brett Kavanagh was attacked as a "WASP". Identification as a "Midwesterner" or "Southerner" is generally higher than identification with the country-of-origin on surname.
It does appear that Gen Z rightists are less likely to chase AZN grills than the preceding Millennials. Our people would swear it off if an East Asian male married to a white woman gained some ascedency in cuckservative circles. We don't see anyone fetishizing Indian girls, even though some of them are "white". Thank Dinesh for that. There's a presumed thinking that the father's culture will win out, which is ludicrious considering the "flight from white".Replies: @Tulip
The implied argument for “ethnicity” refers to either Hispanic or Arab. No other ethnicities are identified by the Census.
Appalachians are clearly an ethnic group, but not identified as such. Most other sub-white identifiers are of decreased political salience. Recall when Brett Kavanagh was attacked as a “WASP”. Identification as a “Midwesterner” or “Southerner” is generally higher than identification with the country-of-origin on surname.
It does appear that Gen Z rightists are less likely to chase AZN grills than the preceding Millennials. Our people would swear it off if an East Asian male married to a white woman gained some ascedency in cuckservative circles. We don’t see anyone fetishizing Indian girls, even though some of them are “white”. Thank Dinesh for that. There’s a presumed thinking that the father’s culture will win out, which is ludicrious considering the “flight from white”.
O/T
lolololololol
Coming crack up right here
ADL kommisar begins to realize that his brown pets have a mind of their own.
The legacy media attempted to ruin these kids for nothing. They can't find any real White racism, so they have to make it up, and they are increasingly getting caught. Constant racial shaming is the mechanism by which anti-Whites keep the lid on White identity politics. Without it, the Double Standard becomes totally untenable.Replies: @neutral
Audacious Epigone has written of Mormon eugenics before: https://www.unz.com/anepigone/eugenic-mormons/
I’d love to read an analysis of what direction (dysgenic / eugenic) things are going for each ethnic and religious group for the next 20 years. With graphs. Maybe that’s more of a book than a blogpost.
lolololololololololol
I don’t think Sobran’s analysis is wrong. I doubt if more than 10-15% of that group are marrying blacks.
https://twitter.com/egavactip/status/1086808626713542656
ADL kommisar begins to realize that his brown pets have a mind of their own.Replies: @Rosie
I find this whole Covington Catholic episode to be tremendously White pilling.
The legacy media attempted to ruin these kids for nothing. They can’t find any real White racism, so they have to make it up, and they are increasingly getting caught. Constant racial shaming is the mechanism by which anti-Whites keep the lid on White identity politics. Without it, the Double Standard becomes totally untenable.
lolol.
I guess that the rate of abortion ‘favors white republicans too.
And the population becomes less and less intelligent. The easier to makes slaves of.
Its hardly our brightest and best that are miscegenating.
The stupid, the desperate, the easily led.
The legacy media attempted to ruin these kids for nothing. They can't find any real White racism, so they have to make it up, and they are increasingly getting caught. Constant racial shaming is the mechanism by which anti-Whites keep the lid on White identity politics. Without it, the Double Standard becomes totally untenable.Replies: @neutral
There have been multiple stories of grooming gangs in Britain of young white girls and you have teenagers being blown up in a concert. In Germany you have mass rapes in Cologne, in France you have a massacre in Batlacan and the people there overwhelmingly ended up voting for Macron. None of those resulted in white pilling, the only thing that happened that anti white laws and enforcement increased. The same will happen here, there can never be a whitepilling until jewish control of the media is eliminated.
Jewish control of the media will continue as long as Whites remain unaware of it. Failed hoaxes like this are useful precisely because they expose media hostility to the White population.
Owning the megaphone makes this possible. Poisoning people's minds for decades with their entertainment/propaganda ensures that people will forever be receptive to their lives and dismissive of the truth. Suggestions welcome.Replies: @Rosie, @Audacious Epigone
About 40% of 18-34 year olds are non white. Why I ask are only 15% of left wing whites in mixed relationships? If they were true believers in social equality then the number would be 40%. Obviously 25% of young democrats are still in the KKK. I can see no other explanation.
The stupid, the desperate, the easily led.Replies: @silviosilver, @Mr. Rational, @Audacious Epigone
CDC birth data, which is sortable by educational attainment (a proxy for intelligence), confirms this: miscegenation is much more pronounced among less educated whites.
Lol what is the liner if this? All this does is that America is a true multicultural society and that right wing white supremacists are a minority thank God
The number is quite small overall.
America is a Eurocentric society, and should it not be Eurocentric it is not America.
Only, it happens over and over and over, and nothing ever changes. Because each time they get caught, they quickly memory-hole the event and move on to the next hoax, which people again fall for, hook line and sinker.
Owning the megaphone makes this possible. Poisoning people’s minds for decades with their entertainment/propaganda ensures that people will forever be receptive to their lives and dismissive of the truth. Suggestions welcome.
Owning the megaphone makes this possible. Poisoning people's minds for decades with their entertainment/propaganda ensures that people will forever be receptive to their lives and dismissive of the truth. Suggestions welcome.Replies: @Rosie, @Audacious Epigone
We’ll see. I predict that in another year or so, new pro-White converts will be telling us that their red pilling started with Covington Catholic.
No doubt some will. Meanwhile, FWIW, my liberal friends and family firmly believe that Jackie Coakley was ‘basically’ telling the truth and that Charlottesville is a hotbed of neo-nazis. Few have the time or inclination to look beyond the headlines. Which is why control of the headlines is everything.
On topic
Honestly surprised, I thought she was a closet lesbian
Appalachians are clearly an ethnic group, but not identified as such. Most other sub-white identifiers are of decreased political salience. Recall when Brett Kavanagh was attacked as a "WASP". Identification as a "Midwesterner" or "Southerner" is generally higher than identification with the country-of-origin on surname.
It does appear that Gen Z rightists are less likely to chase AZN grills than the preceding Millennials. Our people would swear it off if an East Asian male married to a white woman gained some ascedency in cuckservative circles. We don't see anyone fetishizing Indian girls, even though some of them are "white". Thank Dinesh for that. There's a presumed thinking that the father's culture will win out, which is ludicrious considering the "flight from white".Replies: @Tulip
And what exactly is the difference between an Arab, a Berber, a Hispanic, a Sicilian, an Irishman, a Persian, a Northern Indian, a Greek, a Ukrainian, a Turk, and a person from the Caucasus? If a Hispanic marries a Berber, or a Sicilian marries an Irishman, or Turk marries a Persian, what does any of it have to do with the white race? Which of these is a mixed “ethnic” marriage, which is a mixed “race” marriage? Its all B.S. There are Caucasians and non-Caucasians, but 98.5% of American marriages are “mixed ethnicity” or, more often, different pedigrees of Euro-mutts.
https://youtu.be/PcZCGMCDzbU
Amazing how the bottom-left, who could not be older than 14 per the article, looks at least 35.
They, their mamas, and all their brothers and sisters should be summarily shipped to Monrovia.
The stupid, the desperate, the easily led.Replies: @silviosilver, @Mr. Rational, @Audacious Epigone
I was at a bar last night and a couple late-30’s (my estimate) White women paired up next to me.
They had 3 kids between them, sitting at another table. One was obviously mixed-African (obese and ugly as sin). These women were LSMV but not obviously low-class. Not sure what to make of this.
The other two kids were White, good-looking and seemed talented.
If I had to point to a publicly-identifiable event I would say mine started with Tawana Brawley, but in truth my red-pilling was already more than a decade old when that evil lying nikker hit the news.
The epigone’s source for this one is Charles Murray, of course!
https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1087447507351756805
Honestly surprised, I thought she was a closet lesbianReplies: @Audacious Epigone, @Stan d Mute
Does this disprove that?
There will be.
Ha, that breakdown isn’t possible based on the data, unfortunately!
For example, since only 30% of Millennials cohabit with a partner (is that the definition for having a partner?) would the 5% not more accurately represent 1 in 6 not 1 in 20? That would also make Democrats 1 in 2 and therefore it 1 in 3 overall, given a 50/50 partisan split.Replies: @Tyrion 2, @Audacious Epigone
No, it was restricted to those in a relationship, so it’s true it may not capture the tendencies of those not in relationships at all (though I don’t see an obvious reason to think the two things would diverge significantly).
Steve Sailer has suggested an electoral strategy for the GOP–make the Democrats out to be the black party. Not the POC party, but the black party.
I think a slight improvement on his idea would be to present Democrats as the pro-black party, rather than the black party. If the purpose is to shift the most prominent political racial cleavage from pro/anti-white to pro/anti-black, then it's important to highlight organizations and institutions that are pro-black and generate a reaction against them.
It doesn’t specify. I thought about mentioning this, though I don’t think it’s particularly important. Most boomers polled obviously aren’t thinking that, as third-generation Irishmen, their sixth-generation Midlanders are of a different ethnicity–were that the case, the figures would be far higher across the board.
The stupid, the desperate, the easily led.Replies: @silviosilver, @Mr. Rational, @Audacious Epigone
Yes, especially the mudsharks and oil drillers.
Owning the megaphone makes this possible. Poisoning people's minds for decades with their entertainment/propaganda ensures that people will forever be receptive to their lives and dismissive of the truth. Suggestions welcome.Replies: @Rosie, @Audacious Epigone
I’ve been in this game since the mid-2000s. I’m not sure how old you are and how long you’ve been red-pilled, but I can emphatically assure that the landscape has changed a lot in 15 years, for the better. The responses to it have correspondingly become more harsh, but they’re not devastating, especially for those who have financial freedom, either through accumulated wealth or skills that can be provided anonymously.
Agree. We still don’t appreciate how big an event this is, and it’s a totally route as far as unengaged whites are concerned. All the Fake News outlets are backtracking. To discover that the initial narrative was total bullshit takes almost no effort, less so even than in the Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown cases.
I don’t know about that.
The number is quite small overall.
Yes, I know, I remember when he first explained that idea. I wasn’t sold on it at the time, but it’s grown on me over the years.
I think a slight improvement on his idea would be to present Democrats as the pro-black party, rather than the black party. If the purpose is to shift the most prominent political racial cleavage from pro/anti-white to pro/anti-black, then it’s important to highlight organizations and institutions that are pro-black and generate a reaction against them.
He complains that “nothing changes,” but he seems unaware that much of the change is subterranean. But not all of it – some of the change is overt. As you say, for more seasoned campaigners it ought to be clear that the mainstream right is closer to our views today than it was during Dubya’s presidency – and that the anti-white left, already crazy back then, has become even crazier. That’s why a Trump (a) appeared, and (b) shot to the head of the Republican pack so swiftly and easily. It’s also possible that, like for many people, enthusiasm or urgency causes him to overestimate the degree of change that is possible in the short run, but grossly underestimate the degree of change possible in the long run.
Apologies. You’re right. So just 1 in 20 Republican Millennials not 1 in 3 Millennials in general. I was absolutely blown-away by “seeing” the latter. I probably should have realised how unlikely that would be since less than half of Millennials are not white so it’d take a big majority of those not white Millennials to be marry whites for that to be the case.
However, thought of as the above, it should still be the death knell for affirmative action.
https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1087447507351756805
Honestly surprised, I thought she was a closet lesbianReplies: @Audacious Epigone, @Stan d Mute
Is he allowed to touch her “hair”?
Well, insofar as Sicilians, there’s this inconvenient truth:
Mine started at birth when my piece of shit boomer mother abandoned me at an orphanage a couple blocks and a couple months from ground zero of the 1967 riots. But despite your lack of precociousness, I’m glad you came around to Rational thinking.
And that may be the smartest thing Sailer has ever said. Nobody (except self-hating whites) likes negroes. And even the self-hating whites can’t bring themselves to actually live amongst their cannibal gods.
Scoot over to http://www.nytimes.com/projects/census/2010/map.html and select "racial/ethnic distribution" and you can zoom into data by census tract that shows the changes in racial proportions from 2000 to 2010. Eg, check out the black neighborhoods in Queens, NY, the proportion of whites in many census tracts there skyrocketed, and presumably the trend has only gathered pace since 2010. The same is true for much of the northeast.Replies: @Stan d Mute
I didn’t realise that native Americans came from Europe is that your claim? Or are you claiming that Spain is not part of Europe? It’s that your argument? Please enlighten me on what exactly you are saying
Really? Did they perform Vivaldi’s Four Seasons in G-minor or E-flat?
Yes, now the problem is that only card-carrying republicans would be stupid enough to believe it when they see 85% of the Democrat legislative body of 3oo being non-black.
I hope Derb and Reed don’t catch you alone at the Amren Conference.
And I pair up with Z-Man from the beginning of the conference to the end, so they won't be able to isolate me!Replies: @Truth
Is this shift that you perceive happening more quickly than the increase in the third-world population in the USA, or more slowly? Needless to say, it would have to be quick indeed to get out in front of that.
Over in my last rebuttal to Cuck Dave in another thread, I put this link to an African complaining that everyone else on earth hates them. Figured you’d get a kick out of it if you hadn’t seen it yet.
I tend to look at things from a really big picture perspective and to me the story of the negro is akin to the story of the Neanderthal or Denisovan if not an even more primitive sub-species. A whole lot of speciation can occur in 70,000+ years. Why does every other tribe have revulsion at the negro? 70,000 years of evolution, that’s why. He simply doesn’t fit any more than a frozen and reanimated Neanderthal would fit today. Doesn’t make him bad or make me hate him, just don’t reverse my tribes evolutionary progress or weigh us down with his burden.
What’s alarming is that if we don’t do something to remedy this situation, in 70,000 years hence WE may be the Neanderthal in the story of ancient history. Nature recognizes only winners and losers. Since I love my tribe best, I’ll work to help us win. It’s that simple.
That’s not as true as it once was. Maybe your perception is skewed by being from Detroit, but white leftards (presumably) have actually been moving into numerous uberblack neighborhoods over the last couple of decades.
Scoot over to http://www.nytimes.com/projects/census/2010/map.html and select “racial/ethnic distribution” and you can zoom into data by census tract that shows the changes in racial proportions from 2000 to 2010. Eg, check out the black neighborhoods in Queens, NY, the proportion of whites in many census tracts there skyrocketed, and presumably the trend has only gathered pace since 2010. The same is true for much of the northeast.
Yes, I’m informed by motor city mayhem. By the way, if you have Bezos Prime, watch Season 3 Episode 1 of Grand Tour which was filmed in Detriot. It’s a massively subversive bit of film disguised as a funny show about new model extreme muscle cars. Jeremy Clarkson and Andy Wilman are brilliant.Replies: @M. Hartley
You have more tolerance and patience than I my friend. I quit when the self-aggrandizing begins. One, I’m not going to be baited into citing my resume and doxxing myself. Two, my achievements have zero to do with the validity of my arguments. And three, sanctimonious pukes who’ve in no way improved the world incite in me a visceral disgust.
I tend to look at things from a really big picture perspective and to me the story of the negro is akin to the story of the Neanderthal or Denisovan if not an even more primitive sub-species. A whole lot of speciation can occur in 70,000+ years. Why does every other tribe have revulsion at the negro? 70,000 years of evolution, that’s why. He simply doesn’t fit any more than a frozen and reanimated Neanderthal would fit today. Doesn’t make him bad or make me hate him, just don’t reverse my tribes evolutionary progress or weigh us down with his burden.
What’s alarming is that if we don’t do something to remedy this situation, in 70,000 years hence WE may be the Neanderthal in the story of ancient history. Nature recognizes only winners and losers. Since I love my tribe best, I’ll work to help us win. It’s that simple.
Scoot over to http://www.nytimes.com/projects/census/2010/map.html and select "racial/ethnic distribution" and you can zoom into data by census tract that shows the changes in racial proportions from 2000 to 2010. Eg, check out the black neighborhoods in Queens, NY, the proportion of whites in many census tracts there skyrocketed, and presumably the trend has only gathered pace since 2010. The same is true for much of the northeast.Replies: @Stan d Mute
Isnt this just Sailer’s scarce land theory in action? Is the same thing happening in Cincinnati or Columbus? Indianapolis or Chicongo? Des Moines or Denver?
Yes, I’m informed by motor city mayhem. By the way, if you have Bezos Prime, watch Season 3 Episode 1 of Grand Tour which was filmed in Detriot. It’s a massively subversive bit of film disguised as a funny show about new model extreme muscle cars. Jeremy Clarkson and Andy Wilman are brilliant.
Since you’re more of an old-timer, did you notice any Gamergate redpilling bump post 2014?
Back in my day, in the dark ages of the 1980’s, kids showed respect for their elders..
Yeah, thanks for that you whippersnapper.
Back in my day, in the dark ages of the 1980’s, kids showed respect for their elders..
I’ve met Derb multiple times. I was going to stay with him last December but his trip to Mexico conflicted with it. He understands that “spice in the stew” means that miscegenation is okay only in small numbers.
And I pair up with Z-Man from the beginning of the conference to the end, so they won’t be able to isolate me!
Yes, definitely, even though it wasn’t on my radar. I’ve subsequently met multiple people IRL who’ve told me GamerGate was what knocked the scales from their eyes.
Parenthetically, though I’ve been around the HBD-sphere since 2005, I’m not as old as might be assumed. I’m 35 and plan to live until 105 so only a third of the way to the grave!
Whew, that’s hard to tell, but probably more slowly, but the gap is closing.
And I pair up with Z-Man from the beginning of the conference to the end, so they won't be able to isolate me!Replies: @Truth
Now there’s a dude who looks adept with his knuckles.
Fake hoaxes? What about the real ones?!
I have approximately a million flight miles acrued on three carriers just to illustrate the rarity. Much worse are the lardasses requiring seat belt extenders and the slightly smaller lardasses who can manage without the extenders. Those are completely mundane.
What these stories don’t explain is that if you complain there’s a 50:50 chance (probably better than even odds if you’re a blond haired blue eyed man of evil) that YOU will be the one booted off and left to find your way 3,000 miles to a can’t miss meeting or even worse to your much needed weekend at home with wife and kids.
A gender breakdown would also be interesting because certain pairings will imply a high rate of single-parenthood. And single never-married mothers are also pretty strong Dem voters IIRC.
(Re Mr McKenna’s post – the last people who recognise they have BO are those with it, because its in their nostrils always and they cease to notice)
This is relatively uncommon, but miserable as hell when it happens. I was stuck in the front exit row of a 757 on a transcontinental red eye with a dude who smelled dead once. I endured the entire flight with my face wrapped up like a Bedouin in a sandstorm. And on a LaGuardia to Miami flight a family of Israeli Jews was one row behind and on opposite side of my first class window seat smelling like a spilled bottle of really cheap dollar store cologne.
I have approximately a million flight miles acrued on three carriers just to illustrate the rarity. Much worse are the lardasses requiring seat belt extenders and the slightly smaller lardasses who can manage without the extenders. Those are completely mundane.
What these stories don’t explain is that if you complain there’s a 50:50 chance (probably better than even odds if you’re a blond haired blue eyed man of evil) that YOU will be the one booted off and left to find your way 3,000 miles to a can’t miss meeting or even worse to your much needed weekend at home with wife and kids.
Yes, I’m informed by motor city mayhem. By the way, if you have Bezos Prime, watch Season 3 Episode 1 of Grand Tour which was filmed in Detriot. It’s a massively subversive bit of film disguised as a funny show about new model extreme muscle cars. Jeremy Clarkson and Andy Wilman are brilliant.Replies: @M. Hartley
You’re right. NYC is a special case.
Sadly this fits. The ultra majority of racemixers I see are ugly/fat or have other issues (usually drugs). The ones that aren’t seem to be walking, talking examples of ultra-narcissism. But they’re always, without fail, stupid.
This goes from pathetic to mildly amusing as they get angry that no white guy wants anything to do with them when they’re the single mother of a clearly not-white kid.
I would like to put up the following link for your perusal: https://www.girlsaskguys.com/dating/q2605346-finding-love-in-a-racist-society-as-a-single-mother-with-a-biracial
The comments from the (obviously white) guys are amusing and the emotional ‘you poor thing’ comments from girls equally so. I’d link to the black nationalist forums I found this on where the replies are a thousand times more hilarious, but unfortunately it’s closed since.