The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersAudacious Epigone Blog
Congress to Attach Immigrant Welfare Provision to Upcoming SCHIP Bill
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

++Addition++The House bill passed with the provision included. The Senate version, which will likely be voted on next week, does not include it. So what happens in conference committee will be crucial. Consequently, there is still ample time to contact your Congressional representatives in front of the SCHIP expansion passage.

It appears one of the first legislative actions the 111th Congress will take is a resurrecting of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) expansion that President Bush vetoed in 2007. The funding increase previously passed with virtually unanimous Congressional Democratic support, so there is little reason to expect it will fail this time around with an even larger Democratic majority in place.

Of concern to many readers is a new provision that will make the children of legal immigrants eligible for federal SCHIP funding immediately. From the program’s inception over a decade ago, these immigrant families have had to maintain legal status for five years before becoming eligible. According to the WSJ, the new provision is expected to increase eligibility by 400,000 minors, in addition to the 6.6 million who received SCHIP benefits in 2006. Further, it will make immigrant women and children eligible for Medicaid at once.

Why, when there is an underutilized EB-5 Visa program that grants legal residency to potential immigrants who invest $500,000 or more into risky domestic financial enterprises that create ten or more American jobs, must immigrants and their charges be given access to the healthcare dole the moment they are authorized to be living stateside? Are we aiming for an immigration policy that benefits the citizenry, or is the goal to have the citizenry subsidize immigrants?

With an unemployment rate of more than 7% and the major stock indices down 40% over the last year, I suspect opinion polling would reveal an overwhelming majority in opposition to the provision. Supporters are hoping for it to fly under the public radar on the back of SCHIP. If you don’t want the furtive tactic to be successful, contact your incoming Senators and House representative to make them aware of your stance as soon as possible. A vote could come as early as this week. Please feel free to copy anything written here for that purpose.

If SCHIP expansion is something you support, perhaps because it will be funded by an increase in excise taxes on tobacco retailers, the approach to take might be to simply question why it is necessary to risk broad Congressional support for SCHIP by attaching a controversial immigration provision that was not in the previously vetoed legislation that received the support of more than two-thirds of Congress.

While the provision may seem of minor significance, it looks to be a canary in the coal mine for the Obama administration. Open borders advocates hoping to persuade the new President that pushing for things like ‘comprehensive immigration reform’ will be legistatively and politically successful:

Immigrant advocates are hoping the Obama administration and new Congress will go on to tackle bigger measures. Mr. Obama has pledged to try again for a comprehensive immigration bill that had been supported by Mr. Bush but failed in the last Congress. It’s unclear, however, how high a priority that is for Mr. Obama, who has placed greater urgency on issues such as economic stimulus, health care and climate change. …

Immigrant advocates are hopeful that the ban will be eliminated and that the victory will help make the case that pro-immigration action can be a political winner, said Jennifer Ng’andu of the advocacy group National Council of La Raza.

“We consider this the first real test of the new administration and the Congress,” she said.

And so must we. Paladins of sovereignty, it’s time to rise up again. Eternal vigilance.

(Republished from The Audacious Epigone by permission of author or representative)
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Good, let the economic system continue to endure low IQ demographic stress.

    As the proportion of immigrant NAM taxtakers increases and the proportion of white taxpayers decreases, the economic system will start to buckle and then break (assuming it has not already broken…)

    When the economy implodes because of too many people on the dole and when we confirm that those NAMS on the dole have low IQs due to genetics, the average white American will demand either an end to the welfare state or sterilization for welfare dependents.

    Personally, I favor "Welfare for Sterilization" because such a policy would drop the Hispanic birthrate like a rock.

    Just imagine: Section 8 Housing, food stamps, etc, in exchange for the chicas getting Depo Provera shots every three months and vasectomies for the chollos.

    Too many parasites and not enough hosts do not a happy voter make.

  2. Undiscovered,

    Welfare for sterilization is the kind of compassionate conservatism I can really support. Project Prevention basically does it as a not-for-profit.

    I do not want to endure a lower national average IQ and suffer the quality of life consequences in hopes that it will spur the productive class response that is thought to spring from it. I fear it will be too little, too late, for the hopeful point in time when PC omertas are no longer heeded and an empirical approach to human biodiversity adopted by a majority of the voting electorate.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Audacious Epigone Comments via RSS