Here’s a new Open Thread for all of you. To minimize the load, please continue to limit your Tweets or place them under a MORE tag.
Obviously, Seymour Hersh’s account of the Nord Stream pipeline attacks is the big current story:
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream
My own article from last year summarizes a great deal of the background information:
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-of-pipelines-and-plagues/
I’d also recommend this RT segment featuring Ray McGovern, former head of the CIA’s Soviet analyst section and also the Morning Presidential Briefer. According to a participants, one of his German contacts allegedly confirmed the details of Hersh’s account:
And here’s Glenn Greenwald’s discussion of the story and the reaction of the American MSM:

The Winnipeg or NY Jets for the Kiev regime makes as much sense:
The Kiev regime will need recently resigned Western F15 pilots to effectively fly this plane within a 3 year or more period from the present. It takes 3 and probably more years than that to effectively fly this plane.
There was a thing on Facebook a couple years ago where nobody, not even the people in New York, care about the Jets.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMYMvNPBg/
Mr. Unz,
The new thread is appreciated.
_____
Some complain that Skallagrim is too theatrical. So, I offer a more serious review of the Messer.
PEACE 😇
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO75E139NbY
The Kiev regime will need recently resigned Western F15 pilots to effectively fly this plane within a 3 year or more period from the present. It takes 3 and probably more years than that to effectively fly this plane.Replies: @Mikhail, @Emil Nikola Richard
That’s it takes three and probably more years than that to learn how to effectively fly this plane.
“Satan tells you to not fuck niggers”
“We’re all one race the human race”
The first one.
Chronology:
US says no use of Nordstream 2, but Nordstream 1 fine.
Germany concurs and keeps Nordstream 2 closed but uses Nordstream 1.
Russia says Nordstream 1 broken, and Germany must open Nordstream 2 or freeze.
US says Russia lying.
Germany says Russia financially liable.
Russia says Nordstream 1 really broken.
Russia says Germany running out of gas and will freeze.
Germany says Russia must open Nordstream 1 but won’t use Nordstream 2.
Russia refuses to open Nordstream 1, but wants to open Nordstream 2.
Nordstream 1 gets blown up.
Nordstream 2 still functioning.
Russia says again, Nordstream 1 broken, so Germany must use Nordstream 2 or freeze.
Germany laughs because Germany has prepared for many months for this and has plenty of gas.
Putinists online declare NATO will collapse because US blew up pipeline Russia wanted and not pipeline US wanted because anonymous sources said so.
Germany and US increase funding for Ukraine, send tanks together, cooperation and continue to refuse opening Nordstream 2.
Russia still stuck outside Bakhmut, having mobilised, and using military that online Putinist declared would be in Paris in 2 weeks.
China continues to accept Russian people subsidised oil in exchange for limiting aid to Ukraine, polite words to Russia, free coffee for Putin and not recognising Crimea as Russian.
Online Putinist declared total Russian geopolitical victory.
The German Greens hate hydrocarbons
Greens join German Government
Greens kill NordStream to stop hydrocarbons
High energy prices kill German economy
Green party cannot back down
Germany forced to find expensive substitutes Then why are the Germans desperately constructing LNG import terminals? (1)
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.dw.com/en/germany-scholz-opens-countrys-first-lng-terminal/a-64134715Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
I see that American BS and "fake it till you make it" doctrine is like a religion For the last time you cretin - Germany doesn't laugh and has "prepared" for months by:1.Using much less gas ( about 1/8th)
2.Repeat...Consuming much less gas
3.Buying Russian LNG throughout the SMO. Russian LNG exports to Europe are about 25% of America's to Europe. Expect American and Russian LNG exports to increase even more to EU - but note for obese American retards that their LNG could never come close to replacing Russian pipeline gas
4.Germany still buying Russian pipeline gas for most of 2022.
5. It was always about AFTER winter of 2022/23Europe has basically had to waste 700 billion to 1 trillion USD in government bailouts to energy companies and subsidies to the public to pay for the high energy prices . Thats not practical money that defeats Russia - like by switching to different gas sources at premium price or building replacement infrastructure for different energy like NPP...Thats completely evaporated money . EU + Britain GDP is about 19-20 billion USD , so that is 3.5-5% of EU GDP eradicated in practical terms.. More importantly that is a much , much bigger percentage of government spending on schools, hospitals, social programs etc that are now thrown in a ditch. The EU-UK lemming populations should be rioting at this disgrace - but coronavirus seems to have given them the same practical effects as a lobotomy
All because of trying to keep the parasitic 404 as a gas transit country - i.e have Russia fund the military of this freakshow . These "bailout" packages are over 2-3 years, Ukraine transit money was about 2 billion per year. So basically the "geniuses" or should that be cruel satanists of NATO have sacrificed maybe $1 trillion or 700 billion.......to force 1 country to pay another (fake) country $6 billion.......an amount NATO has since more than paid over to 404 anyway. You could not make up this freakshow!
Replies: @Greasy William
It’s funny, I just last week made a comment to Yahya on the other open thread that the source of all human conflict and unhappiness is the feeling that we are somehow existentially incomplete and inadequate – an idea that I had had before, but had just been suggested to me by comments on that thread in a new and forceful way – and today I pick up – somewhat randomly – a book by Rambachan on the Vedanta of Sankara in which this idea is laid out in the most remarkably lucid and forceful form, as the basis of Vedanta.
And yet there are people who say that there is no great spirit that guides our lives and all is chance 🙂
Rambachan has a wonderful quote on the religious quest, taken, I think, from Hindu tradition – to gain the already gained, to accomplish the already accomplished 🙂
(the idea being, that ignorance of our true nature causes our sense that we are incomplete. In reality, we are Brahman, and must only wake up to that fact, not add anything to ourselves)
In various forms I’ve encountered this before – in the Diamond Sutra, the Buddha says that one does not gain a single thing from enlightenment, and in the Zen tradition, Huang Po says it is like searching for a jewel that was, all along, embedded in ones forehead.
In the wonderful Gnostic Hymn of the Pearl, which had a significant influence on Christianity and was a prevalent spiritual sensibility throughout the late ancient world (Gnosticism, that is), the same idea is given eloquent voice – that we are forgetful of our true natures, and that is the source of our suffering (the Gnostics, of course, added the element that there are sinister spiritual forces keeping us in bondage, which Paul took over into Christianity).
But it’s nice to see once again this ancient truth – which may be the most important possession of humanity – once again expressed. It had somewhat faded from view in my own life, and yet it is really the summit of spirituality, and the cure for modernity. It’s something that should never be forgotten.
There must be a catch here.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @HeavilyMarbledSteak, @Anon 2
You are a cranky new age nutcase.
While entertaining, it does not resemble reality. Try this instead:
The German Greens hate hydrocarbons
Greens join German Government
Greens kill NordStream to stop hydrocarbons
High energy prices kill German economy
Green party cannot back down
Germany forced to find expensive substitutes
Then why are the Germans desperately constructing LNG import terminals? (1)
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.dw.com/en/germany-scholz-opens-countrys-first-lng-terminal/a-64134715
https://youtu.be/gwr52HNIYks
It is like with Leopard 2s. Their delivery was arranged long before the kabuki over whether they would be or not concluded. Unsurprisingly, given that they share all of the same values, the German and American elites are thick as thieves and play people who buy into this "American occupation of Europe" fantasy like a fiddle.
The Greenwald video is a particularly good example of explaining the way “of the way” that Victoria Nuland is the President of Ukraine no matter who the Americans vote for and no matter who the Ukies vote for.
The lull in the fighting, between Donbass separatists and the Kiev government in Ukriane, coincided by Cohenicidence with her removal from power during Trump’s presidency. Between 2017 and 2021 the fighting more or less stopped.
Will anyone rid the region of this troublesome woman? Trump did.
__________(1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/02/12/heads-up-state-dept-operative-and-usaid-administrator-samantha-power-is-in-hungary-seeding-another-color-revolution-deep-state-ukraine-2-0/Replies: @QCIC
Will anyone rid the region of this troublesome woman? Trump did.Replies: @A123
Samantha Power is also back. (1)
Trump 2024 will get rid of her too.
#LetsGoBrandon 😇
__________
(1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/02/12/heads-up-state-dept-operative-and-usaid-administrator-samantha-power-is-in-hungary-seeding-another-color-revolution-deep-state-ukraine-2-0/
"We're all one race the human race"
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/777363024196796426/1073051757699158026/charismatic_churhc.mp4
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/777361459130138627/1073426401014861876/329214891_911959403264868_1304064747119195603_n.mp4Replies: @QCIC
That’s different.
The first one.
__________(1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/02/12/heads-up-state-dept-operative-and-usaid-administrator-samantha-power-is-in-hungary-seeding-another-color-revolution-deep-state-ukraine-2-0/Replies: @QCIC
That video tells the story. A really creepy person bragging about working to ruin other people’s lives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO75E139NbY
The Kiev regime will need recently resigned Western F15 pilots to effectively fly this plane within a 3 year or more period from the present. It takes 3 and probably more years than that to effectively fly this plane.Replies: @Mikhail, @Emil Nikola Richard
I agree. Give the New York Jets to Kiev.
There was a thing on Facebook a couple years ago where nobody, not even the people in New York, care about the Jets.
@ Beckow from previous Open Thread
This can be done (and is being done) on the territory Ukraine already has. No further shrinking is necessary.
If 2/3 of the refugees outside of Ukraine return to Ukraine, the current territory would have around 30 million people. A stalemate at the current lines (give or take Bakhmut and some other settlements) is the most likely result. Though Ukraine taking back more territory towards the Crimean corridor and rural Luhansk is not unlikely. (I doubt that Ukraine will be able to storm large cities like Donetsk)
If Ukraine loses more territories in the East such as Zaporizhia city or Kharkiv (unlikely) it will be a few million less than that.
If Ukraine loses Eastern territories plus Odessa (very unlikely) it will be down to 20 million or so.
The worst case and extremely unlikely scenario would be Russia taking Kiev and all the pre-1939 Soviet territory. This would leave Ukraine with around 12-15 million people, depending on how many refugees settle there from the other side of the Iron Curtain. This territory would be about 140,000 sq. kilometers in size (the map below, plus Transarpathia with Uzhorod and Bukovyna with Chernivtsi) and would thus be slightly larger than Hungary + Slovakia with a similar population of those two countries combined.

Nonsense. Lviv is a beautiful city that attracts young settlers. And it offers plenty of well paid programming jobs. The city’s population has already increased by 150,000 as a result of this war. Entire companies with their young employees have moved to Lviv from places like Kharkiv. If Kiev were lost, many of the young from that city would move to Free Lviv rather than leave Ukraine entirely, and with peace many would return from where they have been refugees in places like Poland. It would most likely be a million plus city (before the war it had a population of about 750,000).
Eastern Poland (which doesn’t have any large cities like Lviv) has a per capita GRP of around ~$11,000 which is a lot higher than Belarus’s $8,567. Within western Ukraine, rural Volhynia and Zakarpattiya would probably be similar to that, while Galicia (Lviv) would be significantly higher.
Romania has a per capita GDP that is slightly higher than Russia’s. And that is with its large gypsy population included.
Bulgaria is a lot richer than Belarus, and that is with its large gypsy population.
Moldova is a small, isolated country, it is a stupid comparison.
Because if the Russians take Donbas they will try to take more. Russians will try to take what they can until they are stopped. Better to stop them in Donbas than to allow the Russians to turn Dnipro, or Kharkiv, etc. into wastelands.
Videos are fun but meanwhile none of my 50 year old male relatives has been conscripted.
Lviv has programmers and researchers, not call centers. Median salary for programmer in Lviv was $3,000 per month in 2021:
https://www.glassdoor.com/Salaries/lviv-software-engineer-salary-SRCH_IL.0,4_IC3537517_KO5,22.htm
The largest cable manufacturers for German cars is in Lviv oblast. Those are not “trinkets.”
That’s what Ukrainians want also. To be safe from Russia’s murdering.
But NATRO was and will be a remote possibility. Though the possibility has increased since the Russian invasion.
Which one of those countries that NATO attacked has nuclear weapons?
NATO has kept Russia out of countries, though.
1,2000-2,000 civilians killed according to Yugoslav estmates.
A small fraction of the amount of civilians killed by Russia in Chechnya or Ukraine. Places that didn’t have NATO protection.
Repeating a lie doesn’t make it true. There is no war over Finland joining NATO. Finland hasn’t joined NATO yet, so there is no NATO protective shield. And Finland is much closer to getting in than Ukraine ever was. Yet Russia isn’t moving against Finland. So clearly the problem is not a nation close to Russia joining NATO.
The problem is Ukraine leaving the Russian World forever. Ukraine is strategically important for Moscow, if Moscow wants to be some sort of Great Power. The Russian Empire and the USSR both included Ukraine.
As our former host correctly summarized, between EU integration and de-Russification policies, Ukraine was leaving Russia behind and cutting itself off completely, becoming as foreign to Russia as Poland, and this was the last chance for Russia to take it back, or to at least salvage as much of it as possible. They hoped to get it all (at least outside Galicia and Volhynia), but will settle for as much as they can.
The fact that they never moved forward is more meaningful than their empty declarations year after year.
BTW, you ignored my statement about NATO as a rule not accepting any country than has ongoing territorial disputes. Russian lackeys like you were bragging how, by seizing Crimea and Donbas, Russia made NATO entrance for Ukraine impossible. It was a brilliant move by Putin.
But now you claim that Ukraine was going to enter NATO anyways, and had to be stopped.
Were Russian lackeys like you lying then, or lying now?
Or were you too stupid to keep track?
It still does, that hasn’t changed. It says that EU and NATO are strategic objectives. Crimea and Donbas are also part of Ukraine according to the Constitution.
And NATO still declares that Ukraine will join NATO. So these things haven’t changed since Russia’s invasion.
What has changed, is that Ukraine’s military has integrated far more with NATO’s military, and had proven itself as a battle-tested worthy potential member of NATO. So, as I wrote, odds of NATO membership have impr0ved as a result of this war, from 5% to 25%.
I'm not interested in which side is right, I'm interested in which side is winning. And Ukraine is clearly winning if you look at the conflict from a bird's eye view and ignore all the minutia that people online sperg about.Replies: @AnonfromTN, @LatW
The German Greens hate hydrocarbons
Greens join German Government
Greens kill NordStream to stop hydrocarbons
High energy prices kill German economy
Green party cannot back down
Germany forced to find expensive substitutes Then why are the Germans desperately constructing LNG import terminals? (1)
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.dw.com/en/germany-scholz-opens-countrys-first-lng-terminal/a-64134715Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
Here is VVP stating that Europe must open Nordstream 2 and that he’ll never deliver by Nordstream 1, literally just before someone blows up Nordstream 1 and not Nordstream 2, thereby fulfilling exactly what VVP wanted, and no one else wanted, except that German gas reserves were sufficient, which he could not have known, but the Americans and Germans playing him did.
It is like with Leopard 2s. Their delivery was arranged long before the kabuki over whether they would be or not concluded. Unsurprisingly, given that they share all of the same values, the German and American elites are thick as thieves and play people who buy into this “American occupation of Europe” fantasy like a fiddle.
AK is wrong about aliens. If anything, NPR, rap, jazz, and autotune Madonna will keep them away – radio aposematism.
Maybe, you can shoot some rock at the Earth at half the speed of light. But, maybe, the Earth is just a robotic deer, and the game warden will nab you, and then subject you to a million years of listening to Cardi B’s worst song on a loop.
This is funny:
Instead, it is just nonsense. There are no lack of beautiful people on American television. Instead,there is a lack of truly ugly people. Watch the BBC version of Pride and Prejudice to see what a television show with ordinary looking extras is like. It is shocking! Even though British people are the best looking people in the world, of course.Replies: @songbird, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Barbarossa
https://twitter.com/WorldWarWang/status/1625165049848541184?s=20&t=sLKKFn3AKc1deDwIzfYW-gReplies: @Leaves No Shadow
I don’t find it funny because I don’t have an unacknowledged burning hatred for Western women.
Instead, it is just nonsense. There are no lack of beautiful people on American television. Instead,there is a lack of truly ugly people. Watch the BBC version of Pride and Prejudice to see what a television show with ordinary looking extras is like. It is shocking! Even though British people are the best looking people in the world, of course.
The beauty standards of the Anglophone media (and some others) have degenerated substantially, since 1995.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
China needs to be appealing to Western women like Sanna Marin, or it isn't at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxdJHYIjvEEReplies: @Leaves No Shadow, @LatW
I rather like older movies for the relative normality of the actors.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird, @Leaves No Shadow, @QCIC
And yet there are people who say that there is no great spirit that guides our lives and all is chance :) Rambachan has a wonderful quote on the religious quest, taken, I think, from Hindu tradition - to gain the already gained, to accomplish the already accomplished :)
(the idea being, that ignorance of our true nature causes our sense that we are incomplete. In reality, we are Brahman, and must only wake up to that fact, not add anything to ourselves)
In various forms I've encountered this before - in the Diamond Sutra, the Buddha says that one does not gain a single thing from enlightenment, and in the Zen tradition, Huang Po says it is like searching for a jewel that was, all along, embedded in ones forehead.
In the wonderful Gnostic Hymn of the Pearl, which had a significant influence on Christianity and was a prevalent spiritual sensibility throughout the late ancient world (Gnosticism, that is), the same idea is given eloquent voice - that we are forgetful of our true natures, and that is the source of our suffering (the Gnostics, of course, added the element that there are sinister spiritual forces keeping us in bondage, which Paul took over into Christianity).
But it's nice to see once again this ancient truth - which may be the most important possession of humanity - once again expressed. It had somewhat faded from view in my own life, and yet it is really the summit of spirituality, and the cure for modernity. It's something that should never be forgotten.Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
There was a time when I was deep into this Eastern Wisdom too. But then I realized, if it is so simple –
– why it is so hard…? Can truth have only accidental realizations in this world, through the enlightened? Why should actually the way to the truth be so hard and for the chosen – shouldn’t truth be shining like the Sun upon everyone?
There must be a catch here.
On the other hand, these truths are so universally attested to in all four corners of the earth in all the great traditions that Truth is in a sense "easy" and universal.
At any moment, at any time, anyone can change their life and access these truths. It's open to anyone, always. Of course, you must change your life and behavior to really be able to see certain things, and the world does indeed seem to be organized to stop you from living the correct way and from accessing these truths - there does seem to be some malign force opposing you (this Gnostic sense is probably behind all the silly conspiracy theories that are flourishing - the feeling is quite justified, although the theories are ridiculous).
But these questions aren't really relevant to you losing or maintaining an interest in Eastern (it's Western, too) wisdom, APP - the fact is, these truths must be tried, you have to live according to them. If they don't utterly transform your life, then they simply aren't true :) That's all there is to it.
The promise is quite simple - it's not some reward in the afterlife, but bliss (ananda) here and now, as a result of living by these truths, it's the peace that passeth understanding, now.
The fruits of the Spirit, after all, are - " ..
love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control".
The promise is for now - it's quite pragmatic. If it doesn't bring joy, then they are lies. If correct practice still doesn't let you "see", then they aren't true.
But - this requires a kind of "faith", as all adventures do. Not blind faith, but the faith to experiment. There is an old Hindu anecdote about a blind man undergoing an operation to restore his vision - the doctor tells him it's a success and if he opens his eyes he will see. But he doesn't believe them and refuses to open his eyes :) Without faith, you can't discover the truth of anything.
As for the rest of mankind, eventually, all come to truth - that we are all immediately there isn't so significant.Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
and its sequel “A Course of Love” (2001). They basically say that we are gods and
goddesses in training. We live in a slow universe for our own protection.
We do create our own reality but very slowly. If our wishes became manifest
faster, we’d destroy ourselves due to all the negativity present in our conscious
and unconscious minds. So first we need to purify ourselves. Once you purify
yourself, you’ll be amazed how quickly your wishes become manifested.
It’s an empirically observable fact.
Fortunately, Poland and Czechia are Late Mature- Early Old Soul countries,
meaning that they’ve become very purified already. Hence the “Holy Poland”
meme. Poland has one of the lowest levels of social dysfunction in the
world, e.g., extremely low levels of murder, rape, and abortion.
Unfortunately, the United States is a Late Young Soul country and Western
Europe is Early Mature Soul level, so both are fairly primitive compared
to Poland or Czechia. There are much more sophisticated models of
the Evolution of Consciousness in existence, e.g., by Ken Wilber, America’s
most translated philosopher, or by Michael Washburn whose approach
employs the tools of Analytic Psychology. However, the Infant-Baby-Young-
Mature-Old Soul level sequence is the easiest to present in a blog like this
one. The Michael teachings are a good reference. I presented a very detailed
version of this model on this blog 3-4 years ago.
If you’re interested in psychedelics, then I recommend the writings of
Thaddeus Golas, evolutionary thinker famous for his mega bestseller
“The Lazy Man’s Guide to Enlightenment.” Golas was in fact a Polish-
American thinker, with a degree from Columbia University. He witnessed
it all, Greenwich Village in the 1950s and San Francisco in the 1960s-‘70s.
A fascinating man. The U.S. is very uncomfortable for the Polish - we tend
to be Late Mature-Early Old souls whereas Americans, being Young Souls,
genuflect before the Unholy Trinity of Wealth, Power, and Fame. As a result
we have very little in common.
There must be a catch here.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @HeavilyMarbledSteak, @Anon 2
If someone told you that you will realize Truth immediately but would cease to exist, would you accept that?
Pointless Truth Without Meaningful Existence is a false one.
To Coconuts and S, about the topic discussed by Charles Maurras in the excerpt posted by Coconuts.
I was going to write a lenghty and unhinged rant, same as usual, and then I learned that someone (Rolo Slavskyi) has published some Shafarevich’s translation on Unz Review.
https://www.unz.com/article/postscript-to-the-three-thousand-year-old-enigma/
https://www.unz.com/article/the-elusive-jewish-solution/
Any Euro people wishing to survive will have a lot of rebuilding to do, and probably be starting off small in size and number.
There must be a catch here.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @HeavilyMarbledSteak, @Anon 2
I don’t have an answer for that. Various traditions offer different answers – in Christianity, it’s a result of the Fall. In Hinduism, it’s the Kali Yuga – things inevitably decay before they are renewed. In Gnosticism and early Christianity, it’s dark spiritual powers on high – the Archons of this world, powers and principalities, that keep us in bondage. Another answer is that each soul has particular lessons to learn. I think they all, symbolically, get at the truth.
On the other hand, these truths are so universally attested to in all four corners of the earth in all the great traditions that Truth is in a sense “easy” and universal.
At any moment, at any time, anyone can change their life and access these truths. It’s open to anyone, always. Of course, you must change your life and behavior to really be able to see certain things, and the world does indeed seem to be organized to stop you from living the correct way and from accessing these truths – there does seem to be some malign force opposing you (this Gnostic sense is probably behind all the silly conspiracy theories that are flourishing – the feeling is quite justified, although the theories are ridiculous).
But these questions aren’t really relevant to you losing or maintaining an interest in Eastern (it’s Western, too) wisdom, APP – the fact is, these truths must be tried, you have to live according to them. If they don’t utterly transform your life, then they simply aren’t true 🙂 That’s all there is to it.
The promise is quite simple – it’s not some reward in the afterlife, but bliss (ananda) here and now, as a result of living by these truths, it’s the peace that passeth understanding, now.
The fruits of the Spirit, after all, are – ” ..
love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control”.
The promise is for now – it’s quite pragmatic. If it doesn’t bring joy, then they are lies. If correct practice still doesn’t let you “see”, then they aren’t true.
But – this requires a kind of “faith”, as all adventures do. Not blind faith, but the faith to experiment. There is an old Hindu anecdote about a blind man undergoing an operation to restore his vision – the doctor tells him it’s a success and if he opens his eyes he will see. But he doesn’t believe them and refuses to open his eyes 🙂 Without faith, you can’t discover the truth of anything.
As for the rest of mankind, eventually, all come to truth – that we are all immediately there isn’t so significant.
Instead, it is just nonsense. There are no lack of beautiful people on American television. Instead,there is a lack of truly ugly people. Watch the BBC version of Pride and Prejudice to see what a television show with ordinary looking extras is like. It is shocking! Even though British people are the best looking people in the world, of course.Replies: @songbird, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Barbarossa
Rachel Maddow is a substantial fraction Middle Eastern (a fact surely known by Anglin), but that is besides the point. She is an ugly lesbo, and that is the main thing.
Are you talking about the show made in 1995? (haven’t seen it) Maddow wasn’t even on TV, until 2005, and then not as the lead.
The beauty standards of the Anglophone media (and some others) have degenerated substantially, since 1995.
(She likes homos but you can bet most homos do not like her. She is an industrial level of un-likable.)Replies: @songbird
Charles Manson wrote a song about that. It was a big hit with the Brian Wilson Neil Young party set.
I liked his take on Boyd Rice and Michael Moynihan:
https://youtu.be/XaSnkjqeY-UReplies: @Emil Nikola Richard
The beauty standards of the Anglophone media (and some others) have degenerated substantially, since 1995.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
She has chosen to grow into that. She was the apple of her parents’ eyes when she was attending Castro Valley High School. The probability is high (~.95) she has hated all men starting with daddy for a very long time. This has nothing to do with Freud. Freud can tell you close to zilch about modern California.
(She likes homos but you can bet most homos do not like her. She is an industrial level of un-likable.)
But I get tired of this feminist rhetoric that masculine men hate women. They don't, and normal women don't like soyjacks.
BTW, I see Yahya will not accept Rachel Maddow back into the fold (however beautiful TL asserts she is.) Perhaps, Jennifer Connelly, or ScarJo, if they were younger?Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @Yahya
(She likes homos but you can bet most homos do not like her. She is an industrial level of un-likable.)Replies: @songbird
If The Picture of Dorian Gray had one message, it was that Oscar Wilde did not like women.
But I get tired of this feminist rhetoric that masculine men hate women. They don’t, and normal women don’t like soyjacks.
BTW, I see Yahya will not accept Rachel Maddow back into the fold (however beautiful TL asserts she is.) Perhaps, Jennifer Connelly, or ScarJo, if they were younger?
But, just one more thing, you think you come across as masculine?Replies: @songbird
On the other hand, these truths are so universally attested to in all four corners of the earth in all the great traditions that Truth is in a sense "easy" and universal.
At any moment, at any time, anyone can change their life and access these truths. It's open to anyone, always. Of course, you must change your life and behavior to really be able to see certain things, and the world does indeed seem to be organized to stop you from living the correct way and from accessing these truths - there does seem to be some malign force opposing you (this Gnostic sense is probably behind all the silly conspiracy theories that are flourishing - the feeling is quite justified, although the theories are ridiculous).
But these questions aren't really relevant to you losing or maintaining an interest in Eastern (it's Western, too) wisdom, APP - the fact is, these truths must be tried, you have to live according to them. If they don't utterly transform your life, then they simply aren't true :) That's all there is to it.
The promise is quite simple - it's not some reward in the afterlife, but bliss (ananda) here and now, as a result of living by these truths, it's the peace that passeth understanding, now.
The fruits of the Spirit, after all, are - " ..
love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control".
The promise is for now - it's quite pragmatic. If it doesn't bring joy, then they are lies. If correct practice still doesn't let you "see", then they aren't true.
But - this requires a kind of "faith", as all adventures do. Not blind faith, but the faith to experiment. There is an old Hindu anecdote about a blind man undergoing an operation to restore his vision - the doctor tells him it's a success and if he opens his eyes he will see. But he doesn't believe them and refuses to open his eyes :) Without faith, you can't discover the truth of anything.
As for the rest of mankind, eventually, all come to truth - that we are all immediately there isn't so significant.Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
A perceptive person will realise that Archons et co. are perhaps more powerful than all the sparks of Light around them – Archons move and enslave the sparks of Light, not vice versa.
Student of Wisdom will soon thus realize that in all these theories the matters of evil are much more convoluted than the Matters of Good, so perhaps focusing more on the former is the right choice if our final goal is the Truth which perhaps makes us aware that neither Good is so good as we wished, nor the Evil so evil as we were told, and yet the opposition does exist.
2. Theories of evil are necessarily more convoluted because it is illusory.
Otoh, I don't think it is unhealthy that you treat these things as real. The descriptive word "illusion" does not mean the descripted phenomenon lacks power, or even personality. Just that it only exists as something partial.
3. Light is there shining brightly, but humans turn away and cower, for fear of what it might reveal about themselves. And this is why they find truth so difficult, even maddening. Introduce bits of it too big for them to them, and watch them go insane.
4. When people say you would have to give up existence to live in truth, they mean you would have to give up what you currently falsely identify as you. A set of lies and copes and fears.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Barbarossa
As for the Archons, according to Christianity, Jesus already destroyed their power and authority. I think there's a lot of symbolic truth in that.
Charlie Manson is one talented individual.
I liked his take on Boyd Rice and Michael Moynihan:
I think I would have gone straight into a nun enclave but she kept on at it for a few more years. Aye ^ 7.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
The choice of Pointless Existence Without Meaningful Truth versus
Pointless Truth Without Meaningful Existence is a false one.
The pro Russian blogger “Slavland Chronicles” says that none of the young men in the families of his Ukrainian relatives have been called up nor do they have any fear of being called up. The press ganging videos that we see on Twitter are likely responses to crisis situations that pop up at various places on the first line of defense. Ukraine has been using cannon fodder to hold the front line while building up the real army in reserve.
I’m not interested in which side is right, I’m interested in which side is winning. And Ukraine is clearly winning if you look at the conflict from a bird’s eye view and ignore all the minutia that people online sperg about.
In other news:
- RF not doing very well at Vuhledar, to put it mildly.
- Wagner is no longer granted access to zeks, and apparently it is no longer allowed to mention Wagner on the Russian media. Maybe our "friend" Prigozhin took it a bit too far with his crazy PR.
But I get tired of this feminist rhetoric that masculine men hate women. They don't, and normal women don't like soyjacks.
BTW, I see Yahya will not accept Rachel Maddow back into the fold (however beautiful TL asserts she is.) Perhaps, Jennifer Connelly, or ScarJo, if they were younger?Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @Yahya
Your reply has nothing to do with my comment, so I give up.
But, just one more thing, you think you come across as masculine?
What if I told you I was wearing a green sweater, and asking for billions of dollars, exactly like Ze? What if I said that I had the same lisp and haircut as Trudeau? Or that I took photos with shirtless Africans like Macron?Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
1. There’s no such thing as “archons”.
2. Theories of evil are necessarily more convoluted because it is illusory.
Otoh, I don’t think it is unhealthy that you treat these things as real. The descriptive word “illusion” does not mean the descripted phenomenon lacks power, or even personality. Just that it only exists as something partial.
3. Light is there shining brightly, but humans turn away and cower, for fear of what it might reveal about themselves. And this is why they find truth so difficult, even maddening. Introduce bits of it too big for them to them, and watch them go insane.
4. When people say you would have to give up existence to live in truth, they mean you would have to give up what you currently falsely identify as you. A set of lies and copes and fears.
(Bows...)Replies: @Yahya
However, in the spirit world there are beings with good, bad, or neutral intent. Not so different from people in that regard.
2. Theories of evil are necessarily more convoluted because it is illusory.
Otoh, I don't think it is unhealthy that you treat these things as real. The descriptive word "illusion" does not mean the descripted phenomenon lacks power, or even personality. Just that it only exists as something partial.
3. Light is there shining brightly, but humans turn away and cower, for fear of what it might reveal about themselves. And this is why they find truth so difficult, even maddening. Introduce bits of it too big for them to them, and watch them go insane.
4. When people say you would have to give up existence to live in truth, they mean you would have to give up what you currently falsely identify as you. A set of lies and copes and fears.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @Barbarossa
Thank you Ma’am !
(Bows…)
I’m a non-dualist, so I don’t believe in two independent opposing principles. Literally everything is a form of the Good, and what we call evil is simply the absence of Good on some level.
As for the Archons, according to Christianity, Jesus already destroyed their power and authority. I think there’s a lot of symbolic truth in that.
(Bows...)Replies: @Yahya
Well we don’t have reliable data on literacy rates; but it does seem likely that literacy rates were relatively (compared to Europe) high during the Islamic Golden Age. Voltaire mentions in Philosophical Dictionary that: “Before the admirable invention of printing, books were rarer and more expensive than precious stones. Almost no books among the barbarian nations until Charlemagne, and from him to the French king Charles V., surnamed “the wise”; and from this Charles right to François, there is an extreme dearth. The Arabs alone had books from the eighth century of our era to the thirteenth. China was filled with them when we did not know how to read or write.”
It should be pointed out though that literacy and high culture activities in the Islamic world were confined to the urban areas; as in other civilizations. There are many hadiths where Muhammad proclaims to the Faithful that “seeking knowledge is obligatory upon every Muslim” and derivations thereof; but this was again predominantly pertinent to the leisured class in the urban Islamic centers. Out in the countryside; the peasants remained mostly non-Muslim (it took 3-4 centuries for Egypt to become majority Muslim) and were neglected by the new Islamic rulers; who saw non-believers first and foremost as a tax base. In the Umayad period the Arab rulers didn’t bother to convert their subjects; since they held ethnic exclusivist notions of Islam. Only in the Abbasid period did conquered people like Persians attempt to join and co-opt Islam into a more universalist faith.
Here we have the classic chicken and egg problem. Did Western domination cause the decline in the Islamic world; or was the decline itself facilitate Western colonization? Bernard Lewis argues that the turning point in power relations between the West and the Islamic world was in 1683; when the Ottomans were defeated for the second time at Vienna. He posits a variety of causes; the discovery of the New World; exhaustion of mines and precious metals; a decline in trade through the ME; prioritization of military activity over commercial ones; and the Mongol invasions. Others have advanced the notion that Al-Ghazali attacks on neoplatonism discouraged the pursuit of knowledge. But revisionist scholars such as Dr. George Saliba have attempted to refute this argument of decline; instead asserting that it was only relative to the West, not absolute; and that scholarship continued centuries after Al-Ghazali and the Mongol invasion: https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-wealth-of-notions-my-review-of-oded-galors-the-journey-of-humanity/#comment-5302518
I tend to favor the last argument; but my opinion is circumspect; as I believe it’s extremely difficult to discern causal factors when n=1. Even with a millennia behind us, scholars haven’t reached a consensus. “Only Allah encompasses all things in knowledge.”
@ Another Polish Perspective
I think almost certainly that there probably is other life outside of the Earth. However, I’m less certain about the claims of ‘alien contact’ already having been made between them and us.
I’m extremely leery of these particular contemporary ‘UFO’ claims due to the context of the times, ie a drive by some, hook or by crook, to stampede the peoples of the world to give up, whether they really want to or not, what little sovereignty and identity they have left so that these powerful people and their hangers on may unhindered create a global superstate/empire.
This meme has been out there awhile.
A Sept, ’63, episode of the sci-fi show the Outer Limits entitled ‘Architects of Fear’ featured a cabal of ‘progressive’ scientist whom, naturally for everyone else’s ‘own good’, unilaterally took it upon themselves to fake an alien invasion to drive mankind together.
One of the scientist, who has volunteered to be surgically transformed into an alien, is to use a weather balloon…err weather satellite, as an ersatz alien spaceship so he may land at the United Nations and dictate to an awed and terrified world a new era of peace and goodwill.
The plan implodes however and the ‘alien’ scientist ends up dead.
The brief clip below of the episode includes a good message at the end that explains how artificially manufactured fear and terrorization is not a productive way to go in bringing about real world peace.
‘Using Tricks to Scare People’ – The Architects of Fear (Sept ’63)
US President Ronald Reagan’s 1987 speech to the United Nations describing how an ‘alien threat’ would be the ideal device to unite mankind.
‘An Alien Threat From Outside This World’ (Sept 21, 1987)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Architects_of_Fear
https://www.cultureready.org/blog/reagans-1987-un-speech-alien-threat-resonates-now
I liked his take on Boyd Rice and Michael Moynihan:
https://youtu.be/XaSnkjqeY-UReplies: @Emil Nikola Richard
Did you ever read/hear the Tracy Twyman bit where she and husband put a curse on Boyd Rice and six weeks later husband was dead?
I think I would have gone straight into a nun enclave but she kept on at it for a few more years. Aye ^ 7.
I'm not interested in which side is right, I'm interested in which side is winning. And Ukraine is clearly winning if you look at the conflict from a bird's eye view and ignore all the minutia that people online sperg about.Replies: @AnonfromTN, @LatW
Pyrrhus was winning. But he was smarter than some people we know.
But I get tired of this feminist rhetoric that masculine men hate women. They don't, and normal women don't like soyjacks.
BTW, I see Yahya will not accept Rachel Maddow back into the fold (however beautiful TL asserts she is.) Perhaps, Jennifer Connelly, or ScarJo, if they were younger?Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @Yahya
Maddow isn’t even 1/8th Middle Eastern; you twit.
ScarJo looks Germanic/Nordic.
Jennifer Connelly looks Black Irish or Italian.
Would pass as Middle Eastern if a few facial features were tweaked though.
Wouldn’t mind accepting her to the fold. She was born in Cairo after all.
Is also beautiful and intelligent.
You can keep the other two.
I don’t recall commenting on that. Though I’m open to being wrong. You are welcome to provide a link to my comment.
Blacks do have a culture; both in Africa and America. The former is primitive and the latter depraved; but they are distinct cultures nonetheless. You are conflating “bad” with “nothing”.
There are pockets of creditable high-culture in Europe. Most of it is indeed “coasting” on previous accomplishments; but that is both a sin and a virtue. It can be good to preserve the achievements of one’s ancestors; whether in literature, music, film, art or architecture. I don’t see the issue with performing Bach or Mozart in a French cathedral every weekend. Many non-European peoples also tend to replay the same music from their golden ages. The Ancient Egyptians maintained the same aesthetic for thousands of years. On the other hand, innovation and creativity are also worthy endeavors. Contrary to what you might think; the presence of foreigners is no impediment to cultural flourishing. Rome during its imperial heights was filled with immigrants from the Middle East and the Balkans; likewise Alexandria was for a millennia the most culturally productive city in the Western world. The Chinese Golden Age occurred under the cosmopolitan Tang dynasty.
I don’t think anyone has a finger on the causes of Western cultural decline. Some posit a general downward trend starting in WW1; though I view the timeline as variable depending on cultural activity. Western music arguably reached its apex in the 19th century. James Huneker in Old Fogy contended that “no great music [has been] made since the death of Beethoven”. That was certainly far before the woke and migration wave. Nietzsche and Spengler were already discussing the decline of the West a century ago. Your racial obsession blinds you from other consequential factors. Wokeism is a symptom rather than cause of decline.
@Latw
Anglin doesn’t need to be of partial German descent to LARP as a Nazi.
Just look at the likes of songbird.
Apparently Irish-Americans now think themselves Aryan ubermenschen.
The deracination must’ve gotten to some of them. Very sad really.
On the other hand, the internet does say Connelly looks like a minor actress called Rena Sofer, both of whose parents were Russian Jews, and so somewhat Middle Eastern, and therefore actually more Middle Eastern than Maddow.
She also looks a lot like Demi Moore, who seems to have an English background and an actress called Cobie Smulders, who is Dutch and English by background too.
Please note that "black Irish" is not actually a genetic thing. Just white Irish people with dark hair and some complete myths, like the "sailors from the Spanish Armada."
As for "decline", I disagree that there's any such thing. Just a lowering of average standards, the same way the IQ of the university system inevitably decreased as the proportion of the population attending university went from 5% to 60%. The presence of foreigners is a key ingredient to cultural flourishing. This is why rulers like Catherine the Great would invite them. The exchange of ideas in person is extremely important. However, that does depend on the foreigners you import. And the types who are necessary for cultural flourishing are obviously few in number and therefore would not qualify as "mass" migration.
Anyone who thinks Rushdie, Einstein or Conrad detracted from the countries they ended up in is being stupid.Replies: @Yahya
There really isn't any close historical analogue to the modern West that was a success story. Certainly not with the same percentages. (Though it hasn't stopped a lot of revisionists from trying) I would say this is fairly self-evident. Musical tradition will be strongest when there are (1.) noble patrons, and (2.) the highest percentage of live performers. Phonograph was invented in about 1877, and first radio broadcast of music, in my very own neck of the woods, was in 1906. Right, your recurring bit where you call me a Nazi because I don't support the dispossession of my people. Tell me, are all Arab elites as high-minded and generous as you? I guess you've won me over, and I'll now choose sides in the Palestinian conflict, with the future expectation, without the slightest doubt in my mind, that the Palestinians and the Arabs who say they support them are honorable people and that my support will be reciprocal.
Keep winning friends and influencing people! You are a fine ambassador for Arabs everywhere!Replies: @S, @Yahya
A relatively common explanation of Western cultural decline, in Nietzsche but in plenty of other writers, was the rise of the mass man and the democratic spirit in politics.
Imo the current mass migration is a problem for creativity because people are inhibited from engaging freely with it and addressing all the issues it raises in an unfiltered way, just as it is becoming more relevant. People creating art are in some way in a dialogue with the society around them and need to have a feel for its values, spirit and social forms, in various Western countries mass immigration is reaching a scale where it is starting to modify these things. Now the process is also being heavily monitored and controlled by bureaucratic political authorities and mass media, taken together I feel this kills inspiration.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Hey Bashi,
Just a few additional notes to what we spoke about on the last thread re: October 1993:
Right, this is quite crucial and would be worth analyzing at some point (not that this would change much in today’s context, but it would be interesting to know). However, my point still stands – the system was established in the sense you described, as in, it was set up, but it was still too fragile (the ruling groups were not fully entrenched, we can see there was a struggle for power). Which is, of course, sad to wreck such a new, fragile system instead of trying to strengthen it. Under the Russian system, the president is also stronger than the Duma, so may have been a factor.
Ok, as long as the Communist entering power were changed into a new form of Slavic Euro democrats or something of that sort, but I doubt they would be. They would regain power and, yes, they may try to stop the oligarchs from being formed, but they would also start all kinds of revanchist activities to re-establish and re-unite the Soviet Union, most likely.
Also, they would lose Western funding. The West simply would not give money to Russian Red-Browns. Russia could probably pull it off on her own, but at the time the Western funding was important – from what I understand, there was borderline hunger (Bush elder was sending chicken drumsticks and canned food), and there was a default? This is of course sad and a disgusting factor that the Soviets had allowed the system to reach such a low bottom, but it was a factor.
I was going to write a lenghty and unhinged rant, same as usual, and then I learned that someone (Rolo Slavskyi) has published some Shafarevich's translation on Unz Review.
https://www.unz.com/article/postscript-to-the-three-thousand-year-old-enigma/
https://www.unz.com/article/the-elusive-jewish-solution/Replies: @S, @Coconuts
Thanks for the two intriguing articles. They both make many good points and are a very good description of the present situation.
Any Euro people wishing to survive will have a lot of rebuilding to do, and probably be starting off small in size and number.
I think almost certainly that there probably is other life outside of the Earth. However, I'm less certain about the claims of 'alien contact' already having been made between them and us.
I'm extremely leery of these particular contemporary 'UFO' claims due to the context of the times, ie a drive by some, hook or by crook, to stampede the peoples of the world to give up, whether they really want to or not, what little sovereignty and identity they have left so that these powerful people and their hangers on may unhindered create a global superstate/empire.
This meme has been out there awhile.
A Sept, '63, episode of the sci-fi show the Outer Limits entitled 'Architects of Fear' featured a cabal of 'progressive' scientist whom, naturally for everyone else's 'own good', unilaterally took it upon themselves to fake an alien invasion to drive mankind together.
One of the scientist, who has volunteered to be surgically transformed into an alien, is to use a weather balloon...err weather satellite, as an ersatz alien spaceship so he may land at the United Nations and dictate to an awed and terrified world a new era of peace and goodwill.
The plan implodes however and the 'alien' scientist ends up dead.
The brief clip below of the episode includes a good message at the end that explains how artificially manufactured fear and terrorization is not a productive way to go in bringing about real world peace.
'Using Tricks to Scare People' - The Architects of Fear (Sept '63)
https://youtu.be/fh7hqOkfzas
US President Ronald Reagan's 1987 speech to the United Nations describing how an 'alien threat' would be the ideal device to unite mankind.
'An Alien Threat From Outside This World' (Sept 21, 1987)
https://youtu.be/MAAHgAuti84
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Architects_of_Fear
https://www.cultureready.org/blog/reagans-1987-un-speech-alien-threat-resonates-nowReplies: @Another Polish Perspective
There is absolutely no reason to stage “alien invasion” to scare people off in order to unite them (this point is often completely missed off), UNLESS of course you have a strong suspicion (or even certainty) that aliens do exist and have an interest on Earth, and you want somehow be proactive, especially as you until now have kept your populations rather ignorant about aliens.
So even if this isn’t about [fake] aliens, it is about [real] aliens ultimately.
BTW, a standard scenario – recently presented in the “Moonfall” movie – says that not only aliens exist, but there are good aliens and bad aliens, which is not an obvious point too – why can’t aliens simply be indifferent..?!
As for the current operation, the missile which shot down the “aliens” is Sidewinder, a rather old missile from 1956, which again makes its targets pretty unlikely “real aliens”.
The real alien disclosure should have something to do with crop circles etc.
Instead, it is just nonsense. There are no lack of beautiful people on American television. Instead,there is a lack of truly ugly people. Watch the BBC version of Pride and Prejudice to see what a television show with ordinary looking extras is like. It is shocking! Even though British people are the best looking people in the world, of course.Replies: @songbird, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Barbarossa
Agree. And it’s a net loss for China to have Western men of Anglin’s profile to boost for it.
China needs to be appealing to Western women like Sanna Marin, or it isn’t at all.
A lot of highQ peoples would benefit from Bryan Caplan's subtlety pro-natalist mantra that parenting doesn't matter. It would make the men happier and more assertive, the women less shrewish, and the birth rate higher, because the cost, both monetary and in time and effort, of child-raising would go down.
Lol at trying to claim that Jennifer Connelly looks more Middle Eastern than Rachel Maddow!
On the other hand, the internet does say Connelly looks like a minor actress called Rena Sofer, both of whose parents were Russian Jews, and so somewhat Middle Eastern, and therefore actually more Middle Eastern than Maddow.
She also looks a lot like Demi Moore, who seems to have an English background and an actress called Cobie Smulders, who is Dutch and English by background too.
Please note that “black Irish” is not actually a genetic thing. Just white Irish people with dark hair and some complete myths, like the “sailors from the Spanish Armada.”
As for “decline”, I disagree that there’s any such thing. Just a lowering of average standards, the same way the IQ of the university system inevitably decreased as the proportion of the population attending university went from 5% to 60%.
The presence of foreigners is a key ingredient to cultural flourishing. This is why rulers like Catherine the Great would invite them. The exchange of ideas in person is extremely important. However, that does depend on the foreigners you import. And the types who are necessary for cultural flourishing are obviously few in number and therefore would not qualify as “mass” migration.
Anyone who thinks Rushdie, Einstein or Conrad detracted from the countries they ended up in is being stupid.
https://st3.depositphotos.com/1022904/16019/v/600/depositphotos_160190176-stock-video-portrait-of-arabic-young-woman.jpgReplies: @Greasy William, @Leaves No Shadow, @Emil Nikola Richard
Since the current system is ultimately about control, if a factor appears you cant control (eg. real aliens), you could introduce a “double” aka fake aliens to keep populations controlled. Then, when real aliens appear or make their move, you already have your populations primed, eg. “Aliens different from our [fake] aliens are bad aliens”. Note that great majority of alien movies are about hostile aliens, and even in the Star Trek Federation all high-level commanders are humans.
In the end, it is more about politics than technology.
Exactly that plot with some extra X-Files homage thrown in.
PEACE 😇
https://youtu.be/JLI4OocZHVQ
https://babylon5.fandom.com/wiki/Visitors_from_Down_the_Street#Summary
Well, British upper-class officers liked Arabs much more than Jews, and upper-class Americans used to ape the British (like Henry James, hm).Replies: @Yahya
I'm not interested in which side is right, I'm interested in which side is winning. And Ukraine is clearly winning if you look at the conflict from a bird's eye view and ignore all the minutia that people online sperg about.Replies: @AnonfromTN, @LatW
The Ukrainian General Staff are not dumb. Ukraine essentially has two armies (or should have at least). One is on the front lines right now, the other is being prepared for the spring offensive.
In other news:
– RF not doing very well at Vuhledar, to put it mildly.
– Wagner is no longer granted access to zeks, and apparently it is no longer allowed to mention Wagner on the Russian media. Maybe our “friend” Prigozhin took it a bit too far with his crazy PR.
China needs to be appealing to Western women like Sanna Marin, or it isn't at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxdJHYIjvEEReplies: @Leaves No Shadow, @LatW
I think a lot of East Asians suffer from a wounded masculinity because your mothers are too controlling. It isn’t always the case, but I imagine that it has only gotten more concentrated the fewer children those mothers have had. Same effort, fewer children, more anxiety.
A lot of highQ peoples would benefit from Bryan Caplan’s subtlety pro-natalist mantra that parenting doesn’t matter. It would make the men happier and more assertive, the women less shrewish, and the birth rate higher, because the cost, both monetary and in time and effort, of child-raising would go down.
On the other hand, the internet does say Connelly looks like a minor actress called Rena Sofer, both of whose parents were Russian Jews, and so somewhat Middle Eastern, and therefore actually more Middle Eastern than Maddow.
She also looks a lot like Demi Moore, who seems to have an English background and an actress called Cobie Smulders, who is Dutch and English by background too.
Please note that "black Irish" is not actually a genetic thing. Just white Irish people with dark hair and some complete myths, like the "sailors from the Spanish Armada."
As for "decline", I disagree that there's any such thing. Just a lowering of average standards, the same way the IQ of the university system inevitably decreased as the proportion of the population attending university went from 5% to 60%. The presence of foreigners is a key ingredient to cultural flourishing. This is why rulers like Catherine the Great would invite them. The exchange of ideas in person is extremely important. However, that does depend on the foreigners you import. And the types who are necessary for cultural flourishing are obviously few in number and therefore would not qualify as "mass" migration.
Anyone who thinks Rushdie, Einstein or Conrad detracted from the countries they ended up in is being stupid.Replies: @Yahya
Work on your reading comprehension skills.
—
Maddow only has one Jewish grandparent.
Connelly’s mother was fully Jewish. Makes her 2x more Middle Eastern by blood.
My objection to Maddow is not on phenotype; but beauty.
Her being a homosexual also automatically excludes her from the Middle Eastern club.
Connelly needs only a few facial operations and a hijab; and we’ll have her fitting into the Middle East in no-time:
A.) Has had her nose done
B.) Looks Irish as the day is long. I don't see anything remotely Near Eastern in Connelly's appearanceReplies: @Yahya
(from previous thread)
U233 is mediocre for weapons production. Only one has been tested and it was a fizzle. Worse yet the U233 cycle is poisoned by U232 which produces very undesirable, frequent, high gamma decay events. This is not a power plant issue, but it can easily break sensitive electronics in weapons applications.
Comparatively, Pu239 is a much easier pathway to a functional fission weapon.
Because breeder style power plant reactors consume the fissile material they are creating, diversion to other uses is difficult. Over accumulation is an undesirable characteristic to be minimized.
While fission bomb material is also produced by breeding, the reactor construction is quite different.
Thorium is inevitably dug up with other Rare Earth Elements. Thousands of years of fuel is not an over statement.
PEACE 😇
Did you watch B5:Crusade?
Exactly that plot with some extra X-Files homage thrown in.
PEACE 😇
https://babylon5.fandom.com/wiki/Visitors_from_Down_the_Street#Summary
China needs to be appealing to Western women like Sanna Marin, or it isn't at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxdJHYIjvEEReplies: @Leaves No Shadow, @LatW
This is actually a big one. Ok, so here it is from someone from the region.. 🙂
The man in the video, is he pure Chinese or a Hapa? Seems like pure Chinese. He has a good combo of boyish looks with a somewhat rugged masculinity – that’s always very appealing. He must also have a mellow personality – a White guy equivalent of that probably would have a more difficult personality or even motivation (not necessarily, but likely, since he’d be desirable “relationship material” for many White women) and the relationship dynamic would be very different (I’ve noticed that Asian men are much easier – not to say there aren’t attractive White guys who are easy to communicate with, of course, there are, it’s just with Asians it is immediately noticeable – they are very kind, mellow, non-confrontational or non-edgy, what little experience I’ve had talking to Chinese in particular – this may seem like a non-attractive feature for a man initially but it is actually helpful in the long term).
There are some interesting types, among the Japanese, as well. There were a couple of interesting types in the Marco Polo cast, but I think they were Hapas.
To be fully open with you, the type of Asian guy that a White woman will like, will have symmetrical features, be slightly taller than average and will be more rugged than the average Asian guy. Nothing new here and sorry to sound so blunt and vain, but it is so.
https://st3.depositphotos.com/1022904/16019/v/600/depositphotos_160190176-stock-video-portrait-of-arabic-young-woman.jpgReplies: @Greasy William, @Leaves No Shadow, @Emil Nikola Richard
Connelly:
A.) Has had her nose done
B.) Looks Irish as the day is long. I don’t see anything remotely Near Eastern in Connelly’s appearance
I wouldn’t be totally surprised if that would be “aliens” revenge for shooting down their crafts (at least it could be explained in this way).
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ohios-apocalyptic-chemical-disaster-rages
Interestingly, it happened near “Eastern Palestine, Ohio, USA” which suggests that Western forces supporting Palestinians didn’t acquire their sympathies just now and only due to the loathsome Israeli conduct. They must be much older, in fact.
Well, British upper-class officers liked Arabs much more than Jews, and upper-class Americans used to ape the British (like Henry James, hm).
https://st3.depositphotos.com/1022904/16019/v/600/depositphotos_160190176-stock-video-portrait-of-arabic-young-woman.jpgReplies: @Greasy William, @Leaves No Shadow, @Emil Nikola Richard
I didn’t even think of that. Sorry.
A female homosexual, maybe. The Middle East is definitely a land that prioritises ogling men over women.
It was the opposite before the Black October 1993. The Supreme Soviet had the legal prerogative to deposit the president. After the coup and the massacre Bor’ka alkash rewrote the constitution. Then Pynya changed it a couple times more to extend his staying at the helm. The first post-Soviet constitution was sensible and balanced. These apes used it as toilet paper. The parliament was a real legislative body, they made it a rubber stamp machine.
There was some talking about CCCP 2.0 but I think none really believed it. And the Supreme Soviet was as nationalistic as it was leftist (see the Stanislav Govorukhin being denounced below by a commie). For once, the nationalist and the communist fractions got along and worked against the common neoliberal enemy. The parliament was Red-Brown. The number one task was to stop the criminal privatization, upend the corruption and exterminate the organized crime. It was to be done before anything else. When the conflict ended in Parliament’s defeat, the corrupt nomenklatura and the organized crime, who fought together against the Red Browns, morphed into the nascent oligarchy.
The Red Browns wanted to find and clame back the “gold of the Communist Parry” that has vanished in the international financial system. They also wanted to stop Russian gold from leaving the country and bring back the part that has been sent to the US. It would have more than compensated for the loss of Western financial aid. They wanted to stop the cheap selling of Russian technology and ressources.
It was in 1998 when the scoundrels in charge stole the Western financial aid and refused to pay back the loans.
The early 90ies economic crisis was prepared and engineered to hasten the collapse of the USSR. The nomenklatura has betrayed the Soviet people. And then they simply disbanded the Union, exported all they could sell, stole the finances and the golden reserves and privatized the economy. It was not a natural process at all.
"Is Iraq the way it is because of Saddam Hussein, or is Saddam Hussein the way he is because of Iraq?"
This idea applies to most places.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @YetAnotherAnon
The Fall of Capitalism, ie the impending economic and political collapse of the United States and it's Western bloc, won't be a natural process at all either.
This event, too, will have a subsequent looting of the remnants of the Capitalist economic system by those who are behind this manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist vs Communist dialectic, the worker being 'worthy of his wages' they tell themselves.
As you allude, it's been an orchestrated top/down (rather than bottom/up) affair since the time of this man-made dialectic's birth in the proto-Capitalist American and proto-Communist French revolutions of 1776 and 1789 respectively.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
As to the actual events of the month of October, they say that there was a Двоевластие at that moment which must be a very critical and difficult situation that probably cannot last for very long. I would say it could be characterized as borderline civil war.
Of course, it is tragic and, that this was also October, is quite symbolic.
Understand that those who defended Yeltsin, the normal people (not just some ultra-liberal journalists or whatever), they didn't defend the oligarchy at the time, but as they phrased it "democracy" (the opposite of fascism and totalitarian communism in their mind).
Yes, the nullifier. You know, in Latvia we, too, had something called the Civic Congress, it was ultra-nationalist but also from what I imagine would've been against neo-liberalism (had they been allowed to function longer). They did most of the work fighting for independence and did the most risky work, but then they were pushed aside and removed from gaining any power (removed by a kind of a coalition of mostly former Commies who changed colors as well as pro-Western nationalists and democrats and what later became liberals).
But of course in Russia it was much more complex and more painful. The liberalization and privatization where needed but not as drastically, this process had to be managed more carefully. Especially in Russia. One of the problems I see there though is the ability to manage the former state properties to make them lucrative. This is understandable, but it would have taken time. Correct, but again, the issue there would have been to take what resources were left over and create lucrative businesses out of them. I think this was the crucial moment that was missed and as a result a lot of national wealth was squandered. Just because it was hard to do, at the time it was easier to sell it to get the money quickly. So at this moment the most important thing is the mechanism and the people who are able to do this. Normal people didn't yet have the skills to do it but they could've gained those skills with patience. I can see your point (and your grievance, there is some foundation in it), however, something was seriously off already in the 1980s. Yea, things were better than during the collapse, but there were serious flaws that went beyond just the lack of private enterprise - why was there such deficit? There was a productivity problem. There were several decent size factories in the Baltic States, people worked a lot but the goods were shipped out. Urbanization was still going on, more goods were needed, some kind of a ramp of productivity was needed.
Also, remember - oil prices collapsed right in the mid 80s when things were going the best.
From Brookings.edu:
"In 1973-74 the real price of crude oil more than tripled. After declining slightly in 1975-78, it doubled again in 1979-80. But the 1979-80 price increase was eroded between 1981 and 1985, as price declined by nearly 40 percent. Price then collapsed in the first half of 1986, falling by more than 50 percent."
Another factor - the arms race. It was too much, it sucked in too much effort and human capital, money. At least you got to keep the car, that's good. That is so lame, and so low calorie. :( So sorry to hear that, it makes me sad. I have a couple of really sad stories, too, but they are too private and too painful to share. It doesn't have to do with food, though. Btw, you left early, hardship continued for a while.
Just some more friendly input here: in many recent Chinese movies, usually revolving around dragons, it is quite common to see these actors who do all these amazing otherworldly jumps and tricks. Both men and women. It is quite entertaining but I wouldn’t say that in and of itself it adds much to pure sex appeal. It’s better that they lift as it adds a bit of robustness.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPXZq-jx8zw
I wasn't sure what was really the moral of the movie - it was a bit unusual for a Chinese movie to claim that everyone can be a king - but with the simple moral like "feisty women and treacherous men have no place in this world" I could agree.
- Jet Li starts off by facing off against hugely muscular white fighters, and manages to defeat them by being more skilled, thereby demonstrating the "Chinese cultural superiority over whites."
But this is actually a "self-own"-- because what if the white fighters learned become as skilled as Jet Li? whilst still being bigger and stronger.
In real-life whites are stronger in absolute basis (World's Strongest Men), but East Asians are arguably stronger on a pound-for-pound basis (Olympic weightlifting). And David vs. Goliath match-ups you have cases the smaller, more skilled Slavs (Fedor, Cro Cop) beating the hulking East Asian (Hong Man Choi).
- Jet Li's ultimate rival isn't white, but a Japanese samurai. He duels the samurai's katana with nunchaku and bests him. He only loses because the samurai's associate cheated and poisoned him. Although the samurai himself is portrayed as honorable (and the whole incident a fabrication).
But in real life nunchaku ヌンチャク is native to Okinawa, not China, and a totally unrealistic battlefield weapon. While as katana, in addition being arguably the most artistically beautiful weapon in the world, is also arguably the most effective.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK5wmpsW-Yk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pO4MZlPNU1wReplies: @A123, @AP, @LatW
A.) Has had her nose done
B.) Looks Irish as the day is long. I don't see anything remotely Near Eastern in Connelly's appearanceReplies: @Yahya
I know; that’s why I said she looks Black Irish.
I know; that’s why I said she requires some facial surgery to pass in the Middle East.
Her hair and skin color already fit the bill; just the facial features are too European for the Middle East.
On the other hand; some native Middle Easterners look more Irish than Connelly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WM_zetLvrhE&ab_channel=DalalAbuAmneh-%D8%AF%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%86%D8%A9
You could have changed the uniform for a Ukrainian soldier and nobody would know.
But the cousin looks Saudi, converted to Judaism to become a Haredi rabbi.
https://i1.wp.com/www.theyeshivaworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/63eb47c3f1c6d_1676363715.jpg
https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/2165715/family-of-heroes-the-lubavitch-cousin-of-the-bedouin-policeman-killed-in-terror-attack.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02943/izzat-al-douri-ira_2943572b.jpgReplies: @sudden death
Aaah, the typical Chinese hero movies of the genre “one against tens of thousands”.
The last one I saw, “The Shadow” was very pleasing aesthetically, it was like artsy movie + hero movie in one. Lovers joined in music there (the music below is played by them). Aside from that, there was a lot of calligraphy hanging around which wasn’t translated at all! There was one feisty girl, a princess even, but she died, luckily for everyone, making. a throne free for our true, “shadowy” hero (the treacherous brother-king of the feisty princess died too, so the throne was truly free, but of course she was a problem for her brother too). Nevertheless, a movie was pretty dark, at least dark unlike a typical Chinese hero movie.
I wasn’t sure what was really the moral of the movie – it was a bit unusual for a Chinese movie to claim that everyone can be a king – but with the simple moral like “feisty women and treacherous men have no place in this world” I could agree.
Well, British upper-class officers liked Arabs much more than Jews, and upper-class Americans used to ape the British (like Henry James, hm).Replies: @Yahya
Palestine is a common name to refer to the area also known as the Holy Land. It doesn’t necessarily indicate an expression of support for the Palestinian state or people. Edward Gibbon was referring to the area by that name all the way back in 1776:
The village in Ohio was founded in 1828, before the conflict started.
———–
The British upper class were not of one mind.
The British elite in Britain proper tended to support Zionism.
British officers who were sent to the Middle East, such as T.E. Lawrence, Glubb Pasha, and Richard Burton tended to like Arabs better.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpytwj_4Hag&ab_channel=BritishPath%C3%A9
Among the British public today, most are ambivalent, and only marginally more Britons support Palestine (22%) vs Israel (16%): https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2014/03/11/israel-and-palestine-whose-side-britain
Obviously there are Jewish ultra-progressives who hate this, and anti-Semitic true conservatives, but they're pissing into the wind. The conflict has become emblematic of two personality types. And these correlate with the bulk of what the different sides of the culture war prefer. Support will therefore inevitably circle around 50/50.Replies: @Wokechoke
Almost no issue irrelevant to culture war has been more culture warred than Israel-Palestine in Britain. The most SJW town council would fly only the rainbow and the Palestinian flags for decades before they would fly the English flag. And you’re not a political tranny if you don’t have a keffiyeh to wear over your lace bra. Meanwhile, Israel flags will get flown alongside Ulster flags and are dear to small c conservatism.
Obviously there are Jewish ultra-progressives who hate this, and anti-Semitic true conservatives, but they’re pissing into the wind. The conflict has become emblematic of two personality types. And these correlate with the bulk of what the different sides of the culture war prefer. Support will therefore inevitably circle around 50/50.
Instead you'd have to go back to the cabinet formed by Ramsay MacDonald. In this cabinet it was possible to have envisaged the small time chiseling of Arthur Greenwood as chancellor shooting down motorway building, house building car buying frenzy envisioned by, of all people, Oswald Mosley.
Apparently the following racial outbursts happened in the cabinet concerning a Keynsian Credit Boom...before ww2. "Niggers on exported Bicycles" was Chancellor Greenwood's big idea. Remind you of Boris or Sunak?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZAdBs1LDxs
that is the Treasury's Official Position, then as now.
https://st3.depositphotos.com/1022904/16019/v/600/depositphotos_160190176-stock-video-portrait-of-arabic-young-woman.jpgReplies: @Greasy William, @Leaves No Shadow, @Emil Nikola Richard
P (jennifer connaly has sucked harvey weinstein’s dick) ~ .6
Yes, I know this. But in USA you can meet names which clearly refer to the Bible, but mostly to its non-Jewish names like Moab or Canaan. Well, I just checked and there is quite a couple of Sodoms in USA too!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodom
Don’t tell me that calling your place Sodom isn’t Yahwe-trolling…!
In this context, naming something “Palestine” and not “Judea” seems like a conscious choice.
Thomas Friedman writes 99% garbage. But he did write one eminently sensible sentence.
“Is Iraq the way it is because of Saddam Hussein, or is Saddam Hussein the way he is because of Iraq?”
This idea applies to most places.
You could also say that given the country was Iraq, Saddam or someone like him may have been the best ruler. Certainly applies in spades to Gaddaffi, who was IMHO a great ruler of Libya.
And IMHO also applies to Putin. Given the oligarch dominance in 1990s Russia, it's a miracle he survived, and it was only because the oligarchs thought he was their man. Those years when he was slowly and cautiously wresting power from them, boiling the oligarch frog... my impression is that he still isn't in total control but has a modus vivendi with the surviving oligarchs. The war may have strengthened his position has a fair few ran off to Israel.
They better not be trolling me.
I’ll blow their damn airport up!
And put a curse upon their souls.
And it will not be lifted till they have repented to their Lord!
Behold.
I think I would have gone straight into a nun enclave but she kept on at it for a few more years. Aye ^ 7.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Twyman and her husband were investigating a lot of creepy stuff. They both were spiritual tourists that ended in some dark and deadly places. The stuff Charlie Manson was blabbering about Boyd and Mike applies even more to Tracy and Brian. And I don’t think that Hareth Bustani was an Arab but I wouldn’t write more about it.
"Is Iraq the way it is because of Saddam Hussein, or is Saddam Hussein the way he is because of Iraq?"
This idea applies to most places.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @YetAnotherAnon
What about the two Koreas ? There’s a limit to nature and a room for nurture.
You can literally “Go to Hell” in Norway. There is an auto race there every year.
PEACE 😇
Ah, now, would you really accept her, if she were 5/8ths?
Just how cosmopolitan was it, separated by the Himalayas, the Gobi, and the Pacific, and with the closer and more habitable places subjected to wave, after wave of Han colonization, from extremely fertile river valley bases, which had no close parallels in that geographic sphere? What would be the percentage of non-Han within core Han areas, not counting colonial expansions which brought them in contact with China’s current minorities? (quite a many of them fairly Han-looking) More than 1%? 2%? There were <20,000 foreigners in China at the time of the Boxer Rebellion (including Japanese), and that was with steamships and rail.
TBH, not much of Roman culture seems to survive. (And many say that Greek culture was superior.) The two best-preserved Roman novels Satyricon and The Golden Ass seem to both be degenerate filth. The Aeneid (not a novel) is quite good with caveats, but it is based on much older myths (How old is the first vase with Aeneas carrying his father on his shoulders?), and so it shouldn’t be considered a purely imperial product.
There really isn’t any close historical analogue to the modern West that was a success story. Certainly not with the same percentages. (Though it hasn’t stopped a lot of revisionists from trying)
I would say this is fairly self-evident. Musical tradition will be strongest when there are (1.) noble patrons, and (2.) the highest percentage of live performers. Phonograph was invented in about 1877, and first radio broadcast of music, in my very own neck of the woods, was in 1906.
Right, your recurring bit where you call me a Nazi because I don’t support the dispossession of my people. Tell me, are all Arab elites as high-minded and generous as you? I guess you’ve won me over, and I’ll now choose sides in the Palestinian conflict, with the future expectation, without the slightest doubt in my mind, that the Palestinians and the Arabs who say they support them are honorable people and that my support will be reciprocal.
Keep winning friends and influencing people! You are a fine ambassador for Arabs everywhere!
Tholian Fiend, who probably is actually a sub-continental like many think rather than an actual Scandinavian, and Yahoo, or, Yahya rather, are site trolls and sell outs. They've sold their fellow man, their own people, and ultimately their own individual selves out as well, and effectively work for a corrupt and truly genocidal global establishment.
It was for site trolls like these that they invented the 'ignore commentator' button for.Replies: @songbird, @Yahya
Yep.
The Fall of Capitalism, ie the impending economic and political collapse of the United States and it’s Western bloc, won’t be a natural process at all either.
This event, too, will have a subsequent looting of the remnants of the Capitalist economic system by those who are behind this manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist vs Communist dialectic, the worker being ‘worthy of his wages’ they tell themselves.
As you allude, it’s been an orchestrated top/down (rather than bottom/up) affair since the time of this man-made dialectic’s birth in the proto-Capitalist American and proto-Communist French revolutions of 1776 and 1789 respectively.
In early 1992 my family had enough savings to buy cash a car and a country house (datcha), six months later we were ruined and eating humanitarian aid. They gave us a few boxes of expired Slimfast noodle soup. 🙂Replies: @S
But, just one more thing, you think you come across as masculine?Replies: @songbird
It strikes me as more than a little borderline, when I blockquote you twice, and you (not replying to my actual reply to you) say that my reply doesn’t address anything you said.
To whom? You?
What if I told you I was wearing a green sweater, and asking for billions of dollars, exactly like Ze? What if I said that I had the same lisp and haircut as Trudeau? Or that I took photos with shirtless Africans like Macron?
However I am sorry for not replying to your reply. I made a misclick and replied to the wrong comment.
Nonetheless, uou don't strike me as masculine at all. In particular, your posts seem to operate only in black or white, without any shades of grey. You also seem very quick to devalue what triggers you. And you seem keen to assign your own behaviour to others.
I will show you which comments of yours directly correspond to these three observations if you request me.Replies: @songbird
Looks like Russian troops will move forward soon and that Belarus will join the war on the Russian side. I wonder whether Poles will intervene on Ukrainian side as I wrote a couple of days ago.
During the height of the Cold War between American Capitalism and Soviet Communism in 1968, one of the most progressive Multi-Cultural US TV shows there is. StarTrek, broadcast an episode entitled 'Day of the Dove'.
The episode seems to be a case of almost pure projection.
It tells the story of an 'alien entity' which has manipulated a war into being between two equally armed forces, neither side of which is actually intended to ever win. The entity feeds off the hatred generated by the never ending unwinnable war.
To defeat it, the combatants must stand down, perhaps to fight again another day, but only on their own terms.
'Two forces..., each of them equally armed. Has a war been staged for us, complete with weapons and ideology and patriotic drum beating?'
https://youtu.be/c-x2a-GjJls
'And it goes on, the good old game of war, pawn against pawn! Stopping the bad guys. While somewhere, something sits back and laughs and starts it all over again.'
https://youtu.be/AoMD_qKpCNM
Script for the very insightful Day of the Dove (Nov 1, 1968)
http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/66.htm
The Fall of Capitalism, ie the impending economic and political collapse of the United States and it's Western bloc, won't be a natural process at all either.
This event, too, will have a subsequent looting of the remnants of the Capitalist economic system by those who are behind this manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist vs Communist dialectic, the worker being 'worthy of his wages' they tell themselves.
As you allude, it's been an orchestrated top/down (rather than bottom/up) affair since the time of this man-made dialectic's birth in the proto-Capitalist American and proto-Communist French revolutions of 1776 and 1789 respectively.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Yes. Exactly. And today it is not only the Slav they are after, but the Western middle class as well. It’s Westerstroika time.
In early 1992 my family had enough savings to buy cash a car and a country house (datcha), six months later we were ruined and eating humanitarian aid. They gave us a few boxes of expired Slimfast noodle soup. 🙂
There must be a catch here.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @HeavilyMarbledSteak, @Anon 2
It isn’t as hard as many people think. I recommend “A Course in Miracles” (1976)
and its sequel “A Course of Love” (2001). They basically say that we are gods and
goddesses in training. We live in a slow universe for our own protection.
We do create our own reality but very slowly. If our wishes became manifest
faster, we’d destroy ourselves due to all the negativity present in our conscious
and unconscious minds. So first we need to purify ourselves. Once you purify
yourself, you’ll be amazed how quickly your wishes become manifested.
It’s an empirically observable fact.
Fortunately, Poland and Czechia are Late Mature- Early Old Soul countries,
meaning that they’ve become very purified already. Hence the “Holy Poland”
meme. Poland has one of the lowest levels of social dysfunction in the
world, e.g., extremely low levels of murder, rape, and abortion.
Unfortunately, the United States is a Late Young Soul country and Western
Europe is Early Mature Soul level, so both are fairly primitive compared
to Poland or Czechia. There are much more sophisticated models of
the Evolution of Consciousness in existence, e.g., by Ken Wilber, America’s
most translated philosopher, or by Michael Washburn whose approach
employs the tools of Analytic Psychology. However, the Infant-Baby-Young-
Mature-Old Soul level sequence is the easiest to present in a blog like this
one. The Michael teachings are a good reference. I presented a very detailed
version of this model on this blog 3-4 years ago.
If you’re interested in psychedelics, then I recommend the writings of
Thaddeus Golas, evolutionary thinker famous for his mega bestseller
“The Lazy Man’s Guide to Enlightenment.” Golas was in fact a Polish-
American thinker, with a degree from Columbia University. He witnessed
it all, Greenwich Village in the 1950s and San Francisco in the 1960s-‘70s.
A fascinating man. The U.S. is very uncomfortable for the Polish – we tend
to be Late Mature-Early Old souls whereas Americans, being Young Souls,
genuflect before the Unholy Trinity of Wealth, Power, and Fame. As a result
we have very little in common.
Obviously there are Jewish ultra-progressives who hate this, and anti-Semitic true conservatives, but they're pissing into the wind. The conflict has become emblematic of two personality types. And these correlate with the bulk of what the different sides of the culture war prefer. Support will therefore inevitably circle around 50/50.Replies: @Wokechoke
Teh decisive battle on Jews was fought over in the Labour Party, not the Tory Party which was partly founded by Benjamin Disraeli anyway. And I’m not talking about the Jeremy Corbyn battles.
Instead you’d have to go back to the cabinet formed by Ramsay MacDonald. In this cabinet it was possible to have envisaged the small time chiseling of Arthur Greenwood as chancellor shooting down motorway building, house building car buying frenzy envisioned by, of all people, Oswald Mosley.
Apparently the following racial outbursts happened in the cabinet concerning a Keynsian Credit Boom…before ww2. “Niggers on exported Bicycles” was Chancellor Greenwood’s big idea. Remind you of Boris or Sunak?
that is the Treasury’s Official Position, then as now.
What do you base this prediction on? I’ve been following different sources to get clues about the announced Russian winter offensive but there seems to be a general assessment that Russia has not amassed enough forces to do much more than what’s it already doing with its multiple pushes in different parts of the front. Russia (or Belarus) cannot hide from the satellites the big contingents they would need to change the situation dramatically. Today Michael Hofman did retweet some satellite images of a new field camp detected near Voronezh though.
The decisive battle on Jews was fought over in the Labour Party, not the Tory Party which was partly founded by Benjamin Disraeli anyway. And I’m not talking about the Jeremy Corbyn battles.
Instead you’d have to go back to the cabinet formed by Ramsay MacDonald. In this cabinet it is possible to see the small time chiseling of Arthur Greenwood as chancellor shooting down a domestic motorway building, house building car buying frenzy beautifully proposed by, of all people, Oswald Mosley.
Apparently the following racial outbursts happened in the cabinet concerning a domestic Keynsian Credit Boom…before ww2. “N*ggers on exported Bicycles” was Chancellor Greenwood’s big counter idea. Remind you of Boris or Sunak? it’s a 9 minute clip.
that is the Treasury’s Official Position, then as now.
aside from the latent antisemitism, this is an excellent analysis of the current state of the war and the likely trajectory of things going forward: https://roloslavskiy.substack.com/p/we-are-entering-the-final-phase-of
tl;dr: Russia is given the remainder of the Donbas in exchange for giving up the Crimea landbridge. Ukraine publicly commits to not seek NATO or EU membership.
There really isn't any close historical analogue to the modern West that was a success story. Certainly not with the same percentages. (Though it hasn't stopped a lot of revisionists from trying) I would say this is fairly self-evident. Musical tradition will be strongest when there are (1.) noble patrons, and (2.) the highest percentage of live performers. Phonograph was invented in about 1877, and first radio broadcast of music, in my very own neck of the woods, was in 1906. Right, your recurring bit where you call me a Nazi because I don't support the dispossession of my people. Tell me, are all Arab elites as high-minded and generous as you? I guess you've won me over, and I'll now choose sides in the Palestinian conflict, with the future expectation, without the slightest doubt in my mind, that the Palestinians and the Arabs who say they support them are honorable people and that my support will be reciprocal.
Keep winning friends and influencing people! You are a fine ambassador for Arabs everywhere!Replies: @S, @Yahya
Similarly, Tholian Fiend took great offence that they actually had Northern Europeans (ie ‘Whites’) playing Vikings in a recent movie by that same name, and not ‘persons of color’ instead.
Tholian Fiend, who probably is actually a sub-continental like many think rather than an actual Scandinavian, and Yahoo, or, Yahya rather, are site trolls and sell outs. They’ve sold their fellow man, their own people, and ultimately their own individual selves out as well, and effectively work for a corrupt and truly genocidal global establishment.
It was for site trolls like these that they invented the ‘ignore commentator’ button for.
I was reading a couple Russian Telegram channels that write about these new camps and also about Lukashenko telling that the time is approaching when Belarus will have to take a side in this conflict, that the decision must be made shortly.
You can disagree with parts 2 and 3 or the above statement and be reasonable, but not part 1, and this means Lukashenko is not going to join any war in any significant way, or probably any way at all. He's even gutted what there was of his military to make scrap for the Russians to use.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
In early 1992 my family had enough savings to buy cash a car and a country house (datcha), six months later we were ruined and eating humanitarian aid. They gave us a few boxes of expired Slimfast noodle soup. 🙂Replies: @S
Sounds about right.
Hopefully, when the Fall of Capitalism takes place, you and yours will not be like those Japanese who got hit at Hiroshima by the atomic bomb, and survived it, went to Nagasaki for ‘safety’, only to get hit again. [Some gallows humor there! 😀 ]
What if I told you I was wearing a green sweater, and asking for billions of dollars, exactly like Ze? What if I said that I had the same lisp and haircut as Trudeau? Or that I took photos with shirtless Africans like Macron?Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
Your reply didn’t address what I said. That’s plain.
However I am sorry for not replying to your reply. I made a misclick and replied to the wrong comment.
Nonetheless, uou don’t strike me as masculine at all. In particular, your posts seem to operate only in black or white, without any shades of grey. You also seem very quick to devalue what triggers you. And you seem keen to assign your own behaviour to others.
I will show you which comments of yours directly correspond to these three observations if you request me.
Wouldn't guess that any of this was the terminology employed by the Gaelic warrior class, who fought countless battles, and recited poems about swords and scabbards, and knew their ancestors by heart. Are you sure that you haven't attempted to reshape the definition of the masculine, so that it would be unrecognizable to anyone in the past? Whether warrior, fisherman, or farmer? Maybe, with the desire to invent some new age man?
But that first sentence I find very curious. Are you not implying that it is only men that can understand subtlety? Or women are too Manichean? Surely, what is not yang is yin? Or maybe you are overthinking things, if that is not how you are ordering your categories. I prefer introspection.
To pretend to too good a grasp into other people's heart's and minds, honestly strikes me somewhat as an attempt at witchcraft, or some other sacrilege. And the people who get on the couch the most don't seem a healthy lot either. I think they would be better off praying and going to religious services.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
Belarus doesn’t have a combat effective military. Otherwise Lukashenko might well declare genuine independence. Or the military would probably do it for him.
You can disagree with parts 2 and 3 or the above statement and be reasonable, but not part 1, and this means Lukashenko is not going to join any war in any significant way, or probably any way at all. He’s even gutted what there was of his military to make scrap for the Russians to use.
😉Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
NS2 can only be functional at half the capacity after the attack (which with it illegally prevented from launching by Pindostan German courts would have needed several months for required pressure to be able to do that), which, in a sane world , would have stopped you from writing this garbage at source.
I see that American BS and “fake it till you make it” doctrine is like a religion
For the last time you cretin – Germany doesn’t laugh and has “prepared” for months by:
1.Using much less gas ( about 1/8th)
2.Repeat…Consuming much less gas
3.Buying Russian LNG throughout the SMO. Russian LNG exports to Europe are about 25% of America’s to Europe. Expect American and Russian LNG exports to increase even more to EU – but note for obese American retards that their LNG could never come close to replacing Russian pipeline gas
4.Germany still buying Russian pipeline gas for most of 2022.
5. It was always about AFTER winter of 2022/23
Europe has basically had to waste 700 billion to 1 trillion USD in government bailouts to energy companies and subsidies to the public to pay for the high energy prices . Thats not practical money that defeats Russia – like by switching to different gas sources at premium price or building replacement infrastructure for different energy like NPP…Thats completely evaporated money . EU + Britain GDP is about 19-20 billion USD , so that is 3.5-5% of EU GDP eradicated in practical terms.. More importantly that is a much , much bigger percentage of government spending on schools, hospitals, social programs etc that are now thrown in a ditch. The EU-UK lemming populations should be rioting at this disgrace – but coronavirus seems to have given them the same practical effects as a lobotomy
All because of trying to keep the parasitic 404 as a gas transit country – i.e have Russia fund the military of this freakshow . These “bailout” packages are over 2-3 years, Ukraine transit money was about 2 billion per year. So basically the “geniuses” or should that be cruel satanists of NATO have sacrificed maybe $1 trillion or 700 billion…….to force 1 country to pay another (fake) country $6 billion…….an amount NATO has since more than paid over to 404 anyway. You could not make up this freakshow!
Economics are the one way that time is on Russia's side. The US has approximately 90 more days before it enters a long and deep recession. When the US economy finally starts its extremely overdo meltdown, we'll see how well the Western economies hold up. My guess: not very well
You can disagree with parts 2 and 3 or the above statement and be reasonable, but not part 1, and this means Lukashenko is not going to join any war in any significant way, or probably any way at all. He's even gutted what there was of his military to make scrap for the Russians to use.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Would you bet on it ?
😉
How much are we betting?Replies: @Gerard1234, @Mikel
😉Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
Yes, Belarus will, if they do join the war to help Russia, deploy no more than 48,000 soldiers to Ukraine in 2023.
How much are we betting?
But I would be very surprised myself if Lukashenko sends Belarussian troops to Ukraine at this unfavorable stage. Putin may have most of the population behind him but Luka doesn't. That's why he finally had to align himself with the Kremlin in the first place. If even Putin is unwilling to take the mobilization measures that would allow him to put an end to the misadventure he started, will shrewd Lukashenko be willing to risk much more?Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @AnonfromTN
Tholian Fiend, who probably is actually a sub-continental like many think rather than an actual Scandinavian, and Yahoo, or, Yahya rather, are site trolls and sell outs. They've sold their fellow man, their own people, and ultimately their own individual selves out as well, and effectively work for a corrupt and truly genocidal global establishment.
It was for site trolls like these that they invented the 'ignore commentator' button for.Replies: @songbird, @Yahya
I don’t recall this specifically, but I have often found Thulean to be a good sport. He likes to troll a bit occasionally, but who could blame him for that?
Haha. That makes me remember Kanye, which is doubly funny considering the context.
You are more patient than I am with folks. More power to you!
How much are we betting?Replies: @Gerard1234, @Mikel
The SMO represents a great chance for Belarus to have much, or at least the most rabid, of their white-red-white oppositionists destroyed. Maybe after as many of them as possible have drained out into 404 to be killed (as already have)…..then Belarus will take a more active role. Anyway Belarus and even the normally idiotic Gruzia have had OK side-effects from SMO – for Banderastan and Moldova it has obviously been a disaster.
What’s the point in doing this stupid bet if you are not going estimate how many troops 404 has stationed that side if any Northern front reopening?
Maybe they should’ve taken a bit more time with drafting a new constitution, because from what I understand, Yeltsin wanted to draft a new one from scratch, while Hasbulatov wanted to keep the one from the USSR and just amend it a little. Maybe none of the previous constitutions reflected the situation that was created after the USSR. Was enough time taken to figure out whether there should be parliamentary or presidential form of government?
As to the actual events of the month of October, they say that there was a Двоевластие at that moment which must be a very critical and difficult situation that probably cannot last for very long. I would say it could be characterized as borderline civil war.
Of course, it is tragic and, that this was also October, is quite symbolic.
Understand that those who defended Yeltsin, the normal people (not just some ultra-liberal journalists or whatever), they didn’t defend the oligarchy at the time, but as they phrased it “democracy” (the opposite of fascism and totalitarian communism in their mind).
Yes, the nullifier.
You know, in Latvia we, too, had something called the Civic Congress, it was ultra-nationalist but also from what I imagine would’ve been against neo-liberalism (had they been allowed to function longer). They did most of the work fighting for independence and did the most risky work, but then they were pushed aside and removed from gaining any power (removed by a kind of a coalition of mostly former Commies who changed colors as well as pro-Western nationalists and democrats and what later became liberals).
But of course in Russia it was much more complex and more painful.
The liberalization and privatization where needed but not as drastically, this process had to be managed more carefully. Especially in Russia. One of the problems I see there though is the ability to manage the former state properties to make them lucrative.
This is understandable, but it would have taken time.
Correct, but again, the issue there would have been to take what resources were left over and create lucrative businesses out of them. I think this was the crucial moment that was missed and as a result a lot of national wealth was squandered. Just because it was hard to do, at the time it was easier to sell it to get the money quickly. So at this moment the most important thing is the mechanism and the people who are able to do this. Normal people didn’t yet have the skills to do it but they could’ve gained those skills with patience.
I can see your point (and your grievance, there is some foundation in it), however, something was seriously off already in the 1980s. Yea, things were better than during the collapse, but there were serious flaws that went beyond just the lack of private enterprise – why was there such deficit? There was a productivity problem. There were several decent size factories in the Baltic States, people worked a lot but the goods were shipped out. Urbanization was still going on, more goods were needed, some kind of a ramp of productivity was needed.
Also, remember – oil prices collapsed right in the mid 80s when things were going the best.
From Brookings.edu:
“In 1973-74 the real price of crude oil more than tripled. After declining slightly in 1975-78, it doubled again in 1979-80. But the 1979-80 price increase was eroded between 1981 and 1985, as price declined by nearly 40 percent. Price then collapsed in the first half of 1986, falling by more than 50 percent.”
Another factor – the arms race. It was too much, it sucked in too much effort and human capital, money.
At least you got to keep the car, that’s good.
That is so lame, and so low calorie. 🙁 So sorry to hear that, it makes me sad. I have a couple of really sad stories, too, but they are too private and too painful to share. It doesn’t have to do with food, though. Btw, you left early, hardship continued for a while.
I can! 😀
Am glad you thought it funny. 🙂
You are more patient than I am with folks. More power to you!
I see that American BS and "fake it till you make it" doctrine is like a religion For the last time you cretin - Germany doesn't laugh and has "prepared" for months by:1.Using much less gas ( about 1/8th)
2.Repeat...Consuming much less gas
3.Buying Russian LNG throughout the SMO. Russian LNG exports to Europe are about 25% of America's to Europe. Expect American and Russian LNG exports to increase even more to EU - but note for obese American retards that their LNG could never come close to replacing Russian pipeline gas
4.Germany still buying Russian pipeline gas for most of 2022.
5. It was always about AFTER winter of 2022/23Europe has basically had to waste 700 billion to 1 trillion USD in government bailouts to energy companies and subsidies to the public to pay for the high energy prices . Thats not practical money that defeats Russia - like by switching to different gas sources at premium price or building replacement infrastructure for different energy like NPP...Thats completely evaporated money . EU + Britain GDP is about 19-20 billion USD , so that is 3.5-5% of EU GDP eradicated in practical terms.. More importantly that is a much , much bigger percentage of government spending on schools, hospitals, social programs etc that are now thrown in a ditch. The EU-UK lemming populations should be rioting at this disgrace - but coronavirus seems to have given them the same practical effects as a lobotomy
All because of trying to keep the parasitic 404 as a gas transit country - i.e have Russia fund the military of this freakshow . These "bailout" packages are over 2-3 years, Ukraine transit money was about 2 billion per year. So basically the "geniuses" or should that be cruel satanists of NATO have sacrificed maybe $1 trillion or 700 billion.......to force 1 country to pay another (fake) country $6 billion.......an amount NATO has since more than paid over to 404 anyway. You could not make up this freakshow!
Replies: @Greasy William
This is true. While I do believe that Russia dramatically overestimated the economic impact this war would have on the West, there is reason to believe that Europe will suffer long term economic problems from this conflict and that these problems will become worse with time. Remember that the economic impact of the lockdowns also didn’t show up initially.
Economics are the one way that time is on Russia’s side. The US has approximately 90 more days before it enters a long and deep recession. When the US economy finally starts its extremely overdo meltdown, we’ll see how well the Western economies hold up. My guess: not very well
They have already intervened: Russian troops keep collecting Polish KIA in areas they advance to. But Poland did not intervene on Ukrainian side, it intervened on Polish side: Polish government salivates after Western Ukraine that Stalin took from Poland in 1939. I doubt that Putin would let Poles take a piece of the pie, or even crumbs of that pie, though.
How much are we betting?Replies: @Gerard1234, @Mikel
Interesting, to see you betting on military matters after your epic Taliban prediction.
But I would be very surprised myself if Lukashenko sends Belarussian troops to Ukraine at this unfavorable stage. Putin may have most of the population behind him but Luka doesn’t. That’s why he finally had to align himself with the Kremlin in the first place. If even Putin is unwilling to take the mobilization measures that would allow him to put an end to the misadventure he started, will shrewd Lukashenko be willing to risk much more?
That's not to characterise them as lacking courage, as their methods require immense courage sometimes, but it is so totally different from the European paradigm that even someone occasionally accused of racism could not imagine it.
Well, lesson learned. But if I am guilty of extrapolating from Europeans to Afghans, most here are guilty of extrapolating from Afghans to Eastern Slavs.
We live we learn. One error over 10 days can be learned from, but it seems a thousand errors over a year somehow cannot.Replies: @Beckow, @Wokechoke
I’ve posted before how I believe the self proclaimed ‘progressives’, due to their adoption of the ends justifies the means, have long been ‘projecting’ what is in reality true of themselves upon others.
During the height of the Cold War between American Capitalism and Soviet Communism in 1968, one of the most progressive Multi-Cultural US TV shows there is. StarTrek, broadcast an episode entitled ‘Day of the Dove’.
The episode seems to be a case of almost pure projection.
It tells the story of an ‘alien entity’ which has manipulated a war into being between two equally armed forces, neither side of which is actually intended to ever win. The entity feeds off the hatred generated by the never ending unwinnable war.
To defeat it, the combatants must stand down, perhaps to fight again another day, but only on their own terms.
‘Two forces…, each of them equally armed. Has a war been staged for us, complete with weapons and ideology and patriotic drum beating?’
‘And it goes on, the good old game of war, pawn against pawn! Stopping the bad guys. While somewhere, something sits back and laughs and starts it all over again.’
Script for the very insightful Day of the Dove (Nov 1, 1968)
http://www.chakoteya.net/StarTrek/66.htm
Are you writing this in full seriousness or as a kind of an “innocent” prompt that “a Fool” would bring up?
Poles would not be alone. Our forces would intervene only at the very end and only if needed. So far it seems, it won’t be. It looks like Mykola will do all of the work for us.
However I am sorry for not replying to your reply. I made a misclick and replied to the wrong comment.
Nonetheless, uou don't strike me as masculine at all. In particular, your posts seem to operate only in black or white, without any shades of grey. You also seem very quick to devalue what triggers you. And you seem keen to assign your own behaviour to others.
I will show you which comments of yours directly correspond to these three observations if you request me.Replies: @songbird
Operate? Shades of Grey? Devalue? Trigger? Assign?
Wouldn’t guess that any of this was the terminology employed by the Gaelic warrior class, who fought countless battles, and recited poems about swords and scabbards, and knew their ancestors by heart. Are you sure that you haven’t attempted to reshape the definition of the masculine, so that it would be unrecognizable to anyone in the past? Whether warrior, fisherman, or farmer? Maybe, with the desire to invent some new age man?
But that first sentence I find very curious. Are you not implying that it is only men that can understand subtlety? Or women are too Manichean? Surely, what is not yang is yin? Or maybe you are overthinking things, if that is not how you are ordering your categories.
I prefer introspection.
To pretend to too good a grasp into other people’s heart’s and minds, honestly strikes me somewhat as an attempt at witchcraft, or some other sacrilege. And the people who get on the couch the most don’t seem a healthy lot either. I think they would be better off praying and going to religious services.
That is an attempt at genocide by any standards. Nice that you admit to it. Just remember, attempting a genocide of an ethnic group is a crime and trying it against a larger, stronger group usually doesn’t work. The enthusiasts will face consequences.
Stop lying, there is a total of 35k “IT workers” in the Lviv region, around 70-80% work in customer support, that generally means answering phones or messages. It has some research, but the overall impact on the Ukrainian economy is very marginal, 2-3%, a lot less than in other EE countries. $3k, are you kidding? that’s what a good barista makes.
It was the Ukies who started to murder the Russians in Donbas in 2014-15, nobody disputes that. You live in a lala-land of your retarded slogans.
Killed by Nato. You made my point. Plus Iraq, Libya, Syria…all done by Nato. Why is that ok with you? How can you simply gloss over it? That shows dishonesty and hypocrisy so deep that none of your statements mean much.
Your point about nukes is true, but military plans can account for that – a fatally weakened, surrounded, check-mated Russia would have a hard time defending itself even w nukes. That’s why being right on the border in close proximity and having the Russia-hating Ukies ready was so important. At a minimum it would keep Russia powerless. You want that, so you, but naturally Russia doesn’t want it.
And stop w Finland: a peaceful, rational country w 5 million people. There is simply no comparison to the Russo-phobic fuming madmen in Ukraine. You make no sense when you try to compare Finland (or Estonia) to Ukraine. Think before you write nonsense.
The ‘not meaningful’ and ‘empty‘ was not the way it was presented – that is your desperate spin. It was unquestionable that Nato would get Ukraine at the first opportunity – if you don’t get that you are too naive. At least argue reality and not silly evasive narratives. If you think that ‘territorial conflict’ would prevent it you have no understanding how weasel institutions work: they simply paper over it, declare it something else. What matters is the intent, not how exactly Nato would do it. People who deny it are not serious or idiots.
Nato has been pushed out of Ukraine unless Kiev wins the war in a big way. Nato will feed the conflict, but probably not join in. After Ukies are bled and surrender large parts of their country, Nato will pontificate but stay out. Russia with the war changed the strategic balance.
Russia is erasing towns and thousands of Russian-speaking people.
An honest person would admit which action is closer to genocide. It has increased since the war as companies have moved from places like Kharkiv and many more of Ukraine’s 200,000 IT workers have transferred to Lviv:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/22/business/ukraine-tech-companies-putin.html
The entire country of Slovakia only has 28k such workers:
https://www.itminions.be/en/blog/slovakia-tech-talent-goldmine “Call center work” isn’t IT customer support. The average wage in Slovakia is less than a thousand Euros per month. So those 35,000 + new arrivals programmers in Lviv are making 3 times the average Slovak wage per month, in a city with a very low cost of living. They are living quite well.
Average German wage is about the same as the average Lviv programmer wage.
And programmers in Bratislava make no more than do programmers in Lviv:
http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?loc=2226&loctype=3&job=3&jobtype=2
Given the Lviv us cheaper, the guys in Lviv do better than their Slovak colleagues. 1. That was started by Russians when they crossed the border into Ukraine with their volunteers and weapons. Girkin and Pavlov weren’t Ukrainians.
2. The Russian mass invasion and murder spree began in 2022, 7 years after 2015. Its already a separate event. And now you lie and claim that is “okay” by me.
A difference between NATO and Russia is that Russia kills far more Slavs though. No one is touching obnoxious but tiny North Korea, and everyone tolerates it’s missile overflies over places like Japan. But you think NATO would dare invade Russia?
NATO would forever keep Russia’s hands off Ukraine. This is why Russia doesn’t want NATO there. It wants to reabsorb Ukraine. NATO itself is secondary to the main problem for Russia, which is the eternal loss of Ukraine. Russia would seek to end Ukraine even when - as was the case prior to invasion - NATO membership was very unlikely. Now you’ve slipped and admitted that the problem wasn’t exactly NATO, but Ukraine.
Finns btw don’t like Russia either and have stronger claims on Russian territory than Ukrainians do. You keep bringing up Volyn from 80 years ago but now you’ve conveniently forgotten what Finland had been up to at that time. Like in 2008? No war then and Yushchenko was president. But it didn’t happen. Nor did it in every year since then. Your type like to conveniently change your story. First you brag about how by seizing Crimea and Donbas, Russia has blocked Ukraine from getting into NATO. Brilliant chess move by Putin! But now when you need a pending NATO membership as an excuse for a full invasion and attempt at regime change, that becomes irrelevant.
Your hypocrisy and mendacity on display again and as usual. It also shows how undignified it is, to always lick the Russian boot as you do. NATO is more in Ukraine now than it ever has been.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Beckow
I generally defend the middle class everywhere, but let’s be honest: large part of the Western middle class is simply parasitic. They consume way beyond anything productive they do. I don’t want to list the endless silly made-up activities that provide their living, from distributing gment goodies and virtual money, endless ‘charity’, green activism, protecting against “Russia”, social media, etc…all of that is possible only because the material basis (land, food, infrastructure, energy…) has been either built up or is often obtained at minimum cost from the rest of the world (that virtual money machine :)…
It is inevitable that the rulers would eventually decide to trim the ‘middle class’ nonsense. It has grown too much, consumes too much, they get in the way when elite wants to enjoy the vistas of Yosemite or Venice. So they are being put in their place – fewer of them and with less ability to consume. Given the incredible self-defeating stupidity of most of the Western middle class this is a good thing. They have become too stupid to protect what they have – they are easily led by very primitive propaganda. I say, time for them to go…
Sic transit gloria mundi... Replies: @Beckow
Also your speech. They would control your thoughts if they had the power to do so. Attempting to control our thoughts will consume an increasing fraction of resources.
Ted Kaczynski had a better plan and his plan was retarded.Replies: @Beckow
But I would be very surprised myself if Lukashenko sends Belarussian troops to Ukraine at this unfavorable stage. Putin may have most of the population behind him but Luka doesn't. That's why he finally had to align himself with the Kremlin in the first place. If even Putin is unwilling to take the mobilization measures that would allow him to put an end to the misadventure he started, will shrewd Lukashenko be willing to risk much more?Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @AnonfromTN
Was right on near everything about Putin’s invasion so far, but made a horrible and fatal calculation for Afghanistan: that anti-Taliban forces might actually try and fight. Everyone should have known that Afghans don’t really fight, they either hide and set bombs/traps, or they instantly fold and switch to whichever they think is the stronger side, but this was extreme.
That’s not to characterise them as lacking courage, as their methods require immense courage sometimes, but it is so totally different from the European paradigm that even someone occasionally accused of racism could not imagine it.
Well, lesson learned. But if I am guilty of extrapolating from Europeans to Afghans, most here are guilty of extrapolating from Afghans to Eastern Slavs.
We live we learn. One error over 10 days can be learned from, but it seems a thousand errors over a year somehow cannot.
Wouldn't guess that any of this was the terminology employed by the Gaelic warrior class, who fought countless battles, and recited poems about swords and scabbards, and knew their ancestors by heart. Are you sure that you haven't attempted to reshape the definition of the masculine, so that it would be unrecognizable to anyone in the past? Whether warrior, fisherman, or farmer? Maybe, with the desire to invent some new age man?
But that first sentence I find very curious. Are you not implying that it is only men that can understand subtlety? Or women are too Manichean? Surely, what is not yang is yin? Or maybe you are overthinking things, if that is not how you are ordering your categories. I prefer introspection.
To pretend to too good a grasp into other people's heart's and minds, honestly strikes me somewhat as an attempt at witchcraft, or some other sacrilege. And the people who get on the couch the most don't seem a healthy lot either. I think they would be better off praying and going to religious services.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
By associating “masculinity” with the basic elements of thought, I was hoping to prompt you to learn how to think.
You do?
It is a cliché that someone like you will find attention to your inner life demonic.
I was hoping you would actually give us your definition of masculinity. Does your idea of it not have any fixed qualities? Why so anti-religious? Thought that there were a lot of churches and synagogues accepting gays and trannies now.
Zimbardo (one of your party who fell into disrepute) outright said that he didn't believe in a soul. IIRC, you said you did (probably a dodge to avoid the stigma of not believing in one), but your strange attempt to redefine masculinity seems to show you don't, which is further underlined by your professed belief that you can dissect anyone's brain and see inside their thoughts. Not guess (which everyone enjoys doing), but actually observe their inner self, and then change it. Not just one person that you have rapport with, but anyone here.
I think there is something Satanic in your confidence, and I don't mind saying so. Maybe, it is simple narcissism, but compounded by new age beliefs.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
"Is Iraq the way it is because of Saddam Hussein, or is Saddam Hussein the way he is because of Iraq?"
This idea applies to most places.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @YetAnotherAnon
“Is Iraq the way it is because of Saddam Hussein, or is Saddam Hussein the way he is because of Iraq?”
You could also say that given the country was Iraq, Saddam or someone like him may have been the best ruler. Certainly applies in spades to Gaddaffi, who was IMHO a great ruler of Libya.
And IMHO also applies to Putin. Given the oligarch dominance in 1990s Russia, it’s a miracle he survived, and it was only because the oligarchs thought he was their man. Those years when he was slowly and cautiously wresting power from them, boiling the oligarch frog… my impression is that he still isn’t in total control but has a modus vivendi with the surviving oligarchs. The war may have strengthened his position has a fair few ran off to Israel.
That's not to characterise them as lacking courage, as their methods require immense courage sometimes, but it is so totally different from the European paradigm that even someone occasionally accused of racism could not imagine it.
Well, lesson learned. But if I am guilty of extrapolating from Europeans to Afghans, most here are guilty of extrapolating from Afghans to Eastern Slavs.
We live we learn. One error over 10 days can be learned from, but it seems a thousand errors over a year somehow cannot.Replies: @Beckow, @Wokechoke
An interesting way to try to get out of being wrong – rather feminine. The one error vs. thousands makes no sense – you made it up, your attempt at self-justification.
In this war you are making the error of extrapolating from partial events – you also buy the Kiev-Nato cheerful half-truths. It is a war with a stronger force grinding down a weaker one. Ukies are getting help, but not where it counts: Nato is not sending enough bodies to have a chance against larger better armed Russians.
The idea is that if Ukies manage to make it painful, Russia will agree to a compromise. The problem with that approach is that wars are not like that: the sides always polarize in the first few years – Russia is less yielding than a year ago. Ukies threw everything into it, yet the grind goes on – there is little chance of retaking Donbas-Crimea.
All else is noise, temporary events that will be irrelevant after the war. Kiev’s best hope was an internal Russian collapse – it didn’t happen. Second best was Nato coming in with actual armies-planes-navy and fighting their war – it also didn’t happen. They can hope for an eventual nuclear standoff, but it is a low-odds event.
The current Kiev-West strategy is to fight for every ditch, every tree and every house: it is costly in lives and historically I can’t recall anyone defeating Russia doing it. They are slow, often incompetent, but they don’t give up once they get going. And the numbers are hard to argue with. You will turn out equally wrong about this war as you were about Taleban.
You arguing that Ukraine was surrendering a year ago:
Do you really believe that Ukraine will win this militarily? At best they will negotiate terms of surrender – Ze. is already starting.
You were also predicting the total economic collapse of the West because of *insert some completely ignorant argument about how commodities are the global economy and everything else is financial engineering.* Meanwhile, the Russian economy went into a serious recession in 2022 and the West did not.
And I don't know what you were smoking when you wrote this absurd fantasy:
2-3 days into the fight, the results so far:
– NATO is gone. It run away and it is unlikely back for a long time. (Galicia is a possible exception that makes no strategic difference.)
– “Nazis” in Kiev are running away for their lives or dying. Zelensky is not a Nazi, he has nothing to fear other than the West or Nazis deciding that he has more value as a martyr. No rest for the wicked as they say.
As for me, I admitted I was wrong. I then explained why my imagination was lacking. And I endeavoured not to make the same mistake again. I did this with my one mistake, immediately, and have expanded my range of possible assumptions since, so that I am not again shocked by the extremity of Afghan behaviour.
Meanwhile, you just ignore, deflect, devalue and never learn your way out of everything. Indeed, you can't even seem to admit that you have been wrong, despite being wrong near every day, in every way, on this subject for an entire year!
You can call my method feminine if you like, and yours masculine, but that association will not be good for you.Replies: @Beckow
Too lazy to search, but quite confident you were writing the same about Kharkov-Kherson last summer;)
You in March:
Russia has not yet even achieved air superiority now!
You arguing that Ukraine was surrendering a year ago:
Do you really believe that Ukraine will win this militarily? At best they will negotiate terms of surrender – Ze. is already starting.
You were also predicting the total economic collapse of the West because of *insert some completely ignorant argument about how commodities are the global economy and everything else is financial engineering.* Meanwhile, the Russian economy went into a serious recession in 2022 and the West did not.
And I don’t know what you were smoking when you wrote this absurd fantasy:
2-3 days into the fight, the results so far:
– NATO is gone. It run away and it is unlikely back for a long time. (Galicia is a possible exception that makes no strategic difference.)
– “Nazis” in Kiev are running away for their lives or dying. Zelensky is not a Nazi, he has nothing to fear other than the West or Nazis deciding that he has more value as a martyr. No rest for the wicked as they say.
As for me, I admitted I was wrong. I then explained why my imagination was lacking. And I endeavoured not to make the same mistake again. I did this with my one mistake, immediately, and have expanded my range of possible assumptions since, so that I am not again shocked by the extremity of Afghan behaviour.
Meanwhile, you just ignore, deflect, devalue and never learn your way out of everything. Indeed, you can’t even seem to admit that you have been wrong, despite being wrong near every day, in every way, on this subject for an entire year!
You can call my method feminine if you like, and yours masculine, but that association will not be good for you.
One of the problems with our world is that people sometimes overcomplicate things. When one goes back to being simple-minded, things sometimes become more evident. As Pelevin once wrote : “when you don’t think a lot becomes clearer”. 😉
Yeah, I know. That’s the plan.
Taras, Gritsko and Mykola do not come in unlimited supply. Sooner rather than later, a war of attrition would lead to its logical consequences – the need for the Western backers to either fold or intervene.
Being the simple-minded fool that I am, I believe Westerners would prefer seeing the Eastern Europeans “do the job for them”, just like you would prefer it being done by “Mykola”. Any Eastern European killed is one less to neuter or euthanize during the coming population bottleneck.
I call it the Final Solution to the Slav Problem – FSSP, we could add the Baltic people to the mix, given that they seem eager to participate. Let’s make it FSBSP for inclusivity’s sake. 🙂
Woke is a special problem because of the belief it includes that cultural discourses create reality, it makes them very sensitive to how people talk about or depict things. The ideas about epistemic violence and hidden systems of power encoded in culture causing physical violence are related to this. I think putting so much emphasis on discourse control and harm elimination is obviously destructive to artistic freedom and creativity.
A relatively common explanation of Western cultural decline, in Nietzsche but in plenty of other writers, was the rise of the mass man and the democratic spirit in politics.
Imo the current mass migration is a problem for creativity because people are inhibited from engaging freely with it and addressing all the issues it raises in an unfiltered way, just as it is becoming more relevant. People creating art are in some way in a dialogue with the society around them and need to have a feel for its values, spirit and social forms, in various Western countries mass immigration is reaching a scale where it is starting to modify these things. Now the process is also being heavily monitored and controlled by bureaucratic political authorities and mass media, taken together I feel this kills inspiration.
Cold War era produced the numerous Sovoks in USSR and the numerous Western middle class in the West. Let’s call them Westmids. The Westmids only existed in high numbers because the Western system needed being more attractive than the Soviet one (an easy task). As soon as the Cold War ended, and the Sovok have been dealt with through Perestroika and the ensuing “reforms”, the elites started putting pressure on the Westmids. Mass immigration and the rise of Alphabet People and the “minorities” are tools used to bring the Westmids down. The Westmids are in no way wiser than the Sovoks. And they will also be dealt with through the unfolding Westerstroika.
Sic transit gloria mundi…
A relatively common explanation of Western cultural decline, in Nietzsche but in plenty of other writers, was the rise of the mass man and the democratic spirit in politics.
Imo the current mass migration is a problem for creativity because people are inhibited from engaging freely with it and addressing all the issues it raises in an unfiltered way, just as it is becoming more relevant. People creating art are in some way in a dialogue with the society around them and need to have a feel for its values, spirit and social forms, in various Western countries mass immigration is reaching a scale where it is starting to modify these things. Now the process is also being heavily monitored and controlled by bureaucratic political authorities and mass media, taken together I feel this kills inspiration.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Taken together it kills the Western middle class and its way of living. It is a societal regression and a cultural genocide in making.
All I asked was if that’s what you truly believe or it’s just your wishful thinking.
I neither prefer nor wish this. Do not misconstrue my words. Ukrainian people know very well who their friends are.
Dream on.
If you want something heartwarming, use the AirBnB app and go to a property in Ukraine, especially in places like Kherson. There you see endless supportive reviews from ordinary people in countries that see themselves as Ukrainian friends and who have payed for accomodation they obviously didn't stay in.
There are many similar phenomena to this. Tanks, military training, foreign volunteers and missiles are just the beginning of it.
This all doesn't make the Russian invasion good, or mean that the Ukrainians need display less bravery, but it certainly is of value. And appreciated.
Meanwhile, Russian "friends" use this occasion to scam the Russian people out of oil for half of the going price.Replies: @LatW
But one has to be logical and consequential, follow the dots: Baltics are in NATO and quite close to Kaliningrad and Belarus. If Belarus is dragged into the war, then the violence would probably be spilling to Kaliningrad accross the Suwalki Gap.
It means fighting between Belarus & RusFed on one side and Ukraine, Poland and Baltics on the other. I know that East Europeans think that the West would come to the rescue of their Eastern NATO members. But the West has its own problems. The West might well decide to leave the Balto-Slav sort it out. If I was Western I would not want my people to die for the Suwalki Gap. Just like I don't want the Balto-Slav that I consider as my people to die in retarded wars under Western patronage.
I have decried the war between Ukiestan and RusFed from day one. And I have noticed that I might have been the only one on this forum to consistently do so.Replies: @LatW, @Mikel
Comparatively, Pu239 is a much easier pathway to a functional fission weapon. Because breeder style power plant reactors consume the fissile material they are creating, diversion to other uses is difficult. Over accumulation is an undesirable characteristic to be minimized.
While fission bomb material is also produced by breeding, the reactor construction is quite different. Thorium is inevitably dug up with other Rare Earth Elements. Thousands of years of fuel is not an over statement.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
And yet thorium reactors were discontinued one by one, both in USA and Germany.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/THTR-300
Most recently, just few years ago, it was tried in Halden, Norway, where apparently some meltdown-like situation occurred, and research was discontinued again.
From what I remember, thorium salts destroy pretty fast their containment, which results in all kinds of radioactive leakage, recently in Halden.
The repeated mothballing of thorium reactors cannot have to do just with the nuclear weapons industry demanding uranium (in such a case we wouldn’t build them at all) – clearly we could have a couple of military reactors and the rest of them running on thorium.
https://thoriumnuclear.wordpress.com/
____THTR was a mixed solid U235 + Thorium "Pebble Bed Reactor" [PBR]. This has huge disadvantages versus LFTR. For example, the thorium cycle produces gases such as krypton. The LFTR can shed these gas from the operating fluid. Solid pebbles cannot. There were also science errors in the design of the pebble -- small & light enough to escape the bed.Ultimately, the German THTR was killed by the German Green party for political reasons. However, the poor choice & design of PBR plus related economics made it a pretty easy target for a take down. I do not remember news about an issue. It was a limited duration experimental scale system. (1) My understanding is that it completed it limited period test and concluded as expected.If a major warhead decrease is in the cards, this concept could return. However, that seems unlikely in this geopolitical era. Without "free" plutonium, the economics of the Norwegian test did not warrant commercialization. I am not sure where you got this bit of crazy from, but it is not scientifically sound. You have been mislead or deceived. Clean FLiBe salt can be handled with modern materials in the Hastelloy series. Removing unwanted fission products is included in every serious LFTR proposal. Incidentally, this also reconditions the FLiBe salt back to its optimum clean state. LCTR fast neutron reactor concepts do exist in the literature, however the chloride salts are more problematic versus their fluoride brethren. Liquid lead seems to be the most attractive option for this route if desired. A few nutters, funded by GE, promote liquid sodium PRISM. Guess who owns the PRISM design? Could it be GE? There has been no repeated mothballing. Again, you have been mislead or deceived. There has been only one commercial scale retirement. And, it was a poorly chosen & executed solid fuel design. Thus, not insightful to the LFTR concept. The military used cold war muscle to kill the early, government funded, LFTR work at ORNL and a few other locations. This kill shot was based on poor science, but it happened nonetheless in the quest for weapons grade plutonium.After that, the problem was more bureaucracy than military. All of the civilian laws & regulations had the U235 fuel cycle as a built in assumption. How would a thorium breeder be certified for operation when the rules expect something different? The red tape made it impossible. Also, all of the industry experts had a vested interest in keeping upstart competitors at bay.The desire for Small Modular Reactors [SMR] forced the regulators to open their committees to new ideas. And, LFTR is an excellent SMR option due to passive safety. You can read much more here:https://energyfromthorium.com/lftr-overview/PEACE 😇
__________(1) https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/160131-thorium-nuclear-reactor-trial-begins-could-provide-cleaner-safer-almost-waste-free-energyReplies: @Another Polish Perspective
+++
The "fizzle" was 22 kT, not exactly hopeless.
IIRC, the original idea for the MSRE was to remove most all of the protactinum-232 continuously from the salt bath to to improve neutron economy by avoiding losses on protactinum in the reactor. This removal was demonstrated during the experiment. The removed material decays into U-233 which is returned to the reactor as the fuel. But during this stage it exists outside the reactor as high purity U-233 which could be diverted. I think it has less U-232 than material bred in a conventional reactor and the critical mass is lower than U-235. There is low spontaneous neutron generation so a small gun-type bomb could be made, much simpler than an implosion design. This is the story I read.
The ways to address this issue include good security control over the extracted U-233 (high trust society), set up a process that denatures it immediately or design a reactor that does not remove the Pa-232 from the reactor. I think the last is the route chosen for new designs, but the reactor design is less "elegant".Replies: @QCIC
Yes, and for good reason.
If you want something heartwarming, use the AirBnB app and go to a property in Ukraine, especially in places like Kherson. There you see endless supportive reviews from ordinary people in countries that see themselves as Ukrainian friends and who have payed for accomodation they obviously didn’t stay in.
There are many similar phenomena to this. Tanks, military training, foreign volunteers and missiles are just the beginning of it.
This all doesn’t make the Russian invasion good, or mean that the Ukrainians need display less bravery, but it certainly is of value. And appreciated.
Meanwhile, Russian “friends” use this occasion to scam the Russian people out of oil for half of the going price.
If you want something heartwarming, use the AirBnB app and go to a property in Ukraine, especially in places like Kherson. There you see endless supportive reviews from ordinary people in countries that see themselves as Ukrainian friends and who have payed for accomodation they obviously didn't stay in.
There are many similar phenomena to this. Tanks, military training, foreign volunteers and missiles are just the beginning of it.
This all doesn't make the Russian invasion good, or mean that the Ukrainians need display less bravery, but it certainly is of value. And appreciated.
Meanwhile, Russian "friends" use this occasion to scam the Russian people out of oil for half of the going price.Replies: @LatW
I’m aware of that phenomena, it is heart warming indeed, but you don’t need to tell me about this – I could’ve bought a nice car with what I’ve sent. I have helped the wounded. The wounded will need a lot of help after the war, too.
Well, not only that, it looks like India will no longer be buying Russian helicopters, I guess they didn’t withstand the “combat proof”.
Why would I wish for others becoming engulfed in violence and suffering ? No sane person would. I am a fool, but I am not a sociopath.
Their friends are those who wish for this war to end. Not the ones who are cheering for the slaughter.
Again, why would I dream for something so vile ? Do I come accross in my comments as someone who would like to see other people suffering?
But one has to be logical and consequential, follow the dots: Baltics are in NATO and quite close to Kaliningrad and Belarus. If Belarus is dragged into the war, then the violence would probably be spilling to Kaliningrad accross the Suwalki Gap.
It means fighting between Belarus & RusFed on one side and Ukraine, Poland and Baltics on the other. I know that East Europeans think that the West would come to the rescue of their Eastern NATO members. But the West has its own problems. The West might well decide to leave the Balto-Slav sort it out. If I was Western I would not want my people to die for the Suwalki Gap. Just like I don’t want the Balto-Slav that I consider as my people to die in retarded wars under Western patronage.
I have decried the war between Ukiestan and RusFed from day one. And I have noticed that I might have been the only one on this forum to consistently do so.
Btw, LatW also had a hard time understanding how I can be so opposed to Putin's war now when I was equally opposed to Ukraine's actions in Donbas. It's a strange thing, actually. I used to think that we Euros have a common general view of life and the world. I actually experienced this first hand when I lived in Chile. I met many expats from Europe and the US, including even a couple of Belarussian acquaintances who tried their luck in Chile and stayed at my house for some months. I always found that it was much easier to find rapport with fellow Europeans, even from the opposite side of the continent, than with the locals.
Some years ago I would have thought that one of the things that we have in common these days is regarding war and the killing of innocent people as the most horrendous thing, only to be done as a last resort and to avoid a bigger disaster (as Christian doctrine teaches). But reality has shown me that this was an illusion. LatW is by no means alone in Europe or the US, where most people seem to have started to regard war as a legitimate course of action to solve political/territorial disputes rather than moral dilemmas. In fact, I feel like my non-religious but ethical approach to the question of war probably resonates more with non-Europeans these days than with fellow Euros. From what I read here and there, I have the impression that, unlike most Westerners, non-Euros are just aghast at the war that was once again started in Europe, hoping that it doesn't affect them too much and in general not feeling much need to take sides.Replies: @Sean, @sudden death, @Ivashka the fool
Sic transit gloria mundi... Replies: @Beckow
Precisely…Sic transit gloria mundi…
Westmids’ (let’s use it) best friend was Stalin and the commies: the fear in the Western elite after WW2 made them give and give: incomes up, nice neighborhoods, assured jobs if you behaved, good culture, travel, goodies, etc…
They only needed to do it as long as the commie threat existed – by the late 70’s when the commies went lame, the first ‘reforms’ started. The usual suspects, French, Italian, even Germans, resisted at the beginning and were left alone. The Anglos led the way; they suffer from an incredibly low sense of society and are trained to be ruthlessly individualistic. As always the beginnings were promising: privatizations made a part of the transition generation rich, the older workers were protected, and early migrants were probably more help than trouble. The 90’s were good, esp. since the accumulated Eastern wealth was generously doled out.
It no longer works: you can issue a lot of money backed by nothing, but eventually the numbers don’t work. The pyramid nature of the new capitalism created 1-2 rich generations, but it impoverishing the kids and grandkids. The open borders-mass migration-cheap labor mania has reached absurd levels – look at the US southern border.
The elites are stuck – lowering living standards is risky, although they can count on the accumulated stupidity after decades of heavy propaganda. It takes 20-30 years for people to start acting in their self-interest – we are almost there. Maybe having a war is better :)…or Greta…
And even if all Westmids turned "full Anglin" and accelerationist, what would they do against the Technosphere and the 0,01 % that can drone them to death and cut them from their CBDC bank accounts (in that order).
🙂
Time to move on. The Great White World is about to be terminated. And it happened not because the Russkies invaded from beyond the horizon in tank columns, but because the men of the West got complacent, have been betrayed by their women and sold out down the river by (((their))) elites.
And now there are talks of UFOs ! That's even a better distraction than war in Ukraine or Greta the Green.
https://youtu.be/XCbAEkfXSDE
Who could have thought that this gender neutral guy was such a genius and a prophet (I wouldn't like to find out just who was it that whispered the lyrics to his ear).
😏
Anyway, the Future belongs to those who survive, not to those who lament.
Bonne Saint Valentin à tous !
♥️♥️♥️
Just an intuitive guess with no required evidence about troop movements specifics – imho, all those lukashenkian dances with military drums, at the same time adding weasealisms like “it must be done without harming our sovereign interests”, more likely are meant to keep suspense increasing and therefore notable UA reserves at the north too, while not letting transfer them into east/south where the main RF action may come, but without any RB involvement.
But we”ll se soon as spring is just two weeks away…
And if it starts raining, it will be the worst imaginable time again to do or keep doing the serious offensive there.
Poland effectively closed its Belarussian border on on Friday, allegedly because Belarus sentenced the only member of Polish minority there I ever hear, Andrzej Poczobut, to prison. Now this is surely useful for Belarussian propaganda.
This guy seems to have inherited his position from his father, which suggests some continuity in Soviet nomenclature even in "opposition" circles. Maybe he just plays his role - I lost sympathy to him when I heard that he refused presidential pardon from Lukashenko. Now, if you oppose regime to such an extent, why do you insist on being in Belarus, and in prison for that? But he of course refuses offers of emigration too.
That's not to characterise them as lacking courage, as their methods require immense courage sometimes, but it is so totally different from the European paradigm that even someone occasionally accused of racism could not imagine it.
Well, lesson learned. But if I am guilty of extrapolating from Europeans to Afghans, most here are guilty of extrapolating from Afghans to Eastern Slavs.
We live we learn. One error over 10 days can be learned from, but it seems a thousand errors over a year somehow cannot.Replies: @Beckow, @Wokechoke
You predicted an intractable guerilla war and a Russian occupation.
See what I did with Lukashenko and the Belarussians supposedly invading Ukraine. It was the same back then.
But one has to be logical and consequential, follow the dots: Baltics are in NATO and quite close to Kaliningrad and Belarus. If Belarus is dragged into the war, then the violence would probably be spilling to Kaliningrad accross the Suwalki Gap.
It means fighting between Belarus & RusFed on one side and Ukraine, Poland and Baltics on the other. I know that East Europeans think that the West would come to the rescue of their Eastern NATO members. But the West has its own problems. The West might well decide to leave the Balto-Slav sort it out. If I was Western I would not want my people to die for the Suwalki Gap. Just like I don't want the Balto-Slav that I consider as my people to die in retarded wars under Western patronage.
I have decried the war between Ukiestan and RusFed from day one. And I have noticed that I might have been the only one on this forum to consistently do so.Replies: @LatW, @Mikel
They determine that and they have been explicit about it. They and their friends never wanted this war, they were attacked on their territory.
Who was? Was I ever?
Belarus has gone out of her way to not be dragged into it, but Belarus, unfortunately, is a party to the war by providing Russia with the platform to bomb Ukraine. The Belarusians do not want to fight Ukrainians and vice versa, that’s one of the vilest things I can imagine, but if the Belarusians decide to fight with troops, they will receive it back accordingly. They will be hit on their territory. Their army is not large and has zero experience.
Violence can spill either way. When you go this far, with such an aggressive war, it can spill in the other direction than what you imagine (or desire?). When you mess with borders and deliberately break them, you make them fluid. It can go either way.
That’s just not true. It would be a war with NATO. But it will not go that far.
You don’t know this because you only read your Telegram channels, but the normal Europeans are very angry.
That’s disingenuous. None of us wanted a war like this. If you were consistent and honest, you would have decried the vatniks for supporting it.
Anyway, you know that I like you LatW. No need to go full Latvian Rifelman on me for pointing some of your evident and natural biases.
Bonne Saint Valentin ma belle !
🙂Replies: @LatW
It seems that it is more about numerology than anything else – Russian invasion started on 8th anniversary of the beginning of conflict from Feb 2014.
Poland effectively closed its Belarussian border on on Friday, allegedly because Belarus sentenced the only member of Polish minority there I ever hear, Andrzej Poczobut, to prison. Now this is surely useful for Belarussian propaganda.
This guy seems to have inherited his position from his father, which suggests some continuity in Soviet nomenclature even in “opposition” circles. Maybe he just plays his role – I lost sympathy to him when I heard that he refused presidential pardon from Lukashenko. Now, if you oppose regime to such an extent, why do you insist on being in Belarus, and in prison for that? But he of course refuses offers of emigration too.
Yes but most poor Westmids believe in democracy. So they will try to fix it democratically for a generation and then they would look around and see that the Great Replacement has been completed, the Great Reset is done and “they own nothing and have to be happy”.
And even if all Westmids turned “full Anglin” and accelerationist, what would they do against the Technosphere and the 0,01 % that can drone them to death and cut them from their CBDC bank accounts (in that order).
🙂
Time to move on. The Great White World is about to be terminated. And it happened not because the Russkies invaded from beyond the horizon in tank columns, but because the men of the West got complacent, have been betrayed by their women and sold out down the river by (((their))) elites.
And now there are talks of UFOs ! That’s even a better distraction than war in Ukraine or Greta the Green.
Who could have thought that this gender neutral guy was such a genius and a prophet (I wouldn’t like to find out just who was it that whispered the lyrics to his ear).
😏
Anyway, the Future belongs to those who survive, not to those who lament.
Bonne Saint Valentin à tous !
♥️♥️♥️
You arguing that Ukraine was surrendering a year ago:
Do you really believe that Ukraine will win this militarily? At best they will negotiate terms of surrender – Ze. is already starting.
You were also predicting the total economic collapse of the West because of *insert some completely ignorant argument about how commodities are the global economy and everything else is financial engineering.* Meanwhile, the Russian economy went into a serious recession in 2022 and the West did not.
And I don't know what you were smoking when you wrote this absurd fantasy:
2-3 days into the fight, the results so far:
– NATO is gone. It run away and it is unlikely back for a long time. (Galicia is a possible exception that makes no strategic difference.)
– “Nazis” in Kiev are running away for their lives or dying. Zelensky is not a Nazi, he has nothing to fear other than the West or Nazis deciding that he has more value as a martyr. No rest for the wicked as they say.
As for me, I admitted I was wrong. I then explained why my imagination was lacking. And I endeavoured not to make the same mistake again. I did this with my one mistake, immediately, and have expanded my range of possible assumptions since, so that I am not again shocked by the extremity of Afghan behaviour.
Meanwhile, you just ignore, deflect, devalue and never learn your way out of everything. Indeed, you can't even seem to admit that you have been wrong, despite being wrong near every day, in every way, on this subject for an entire year!
You can call my method feminine if you like, and yours masculine, but that association will not be good for you.Replies: @Beckow
Why are you so obsessed w fighting a straw-man? You misrepresent what I write and then you argue with it. What’s the point? Dont you a better way to argue your side? Let’s get real, I wrote:
Nato is gone. If you haven’t noticed we went from an almost certain Nato in Ukraine (I have described why many times), on Russia’s borders with missiles-bases, to Nato lamely sending arms to outnumbered Ukies and losing the war. There is no chance of Ukraine in 1991 borders in Nato – it was almost certain before the war. You will deny, lie about the plans and intentions, blab nonsense about ‘but it was postponed’…but you know that is a lie. More importantly Russians believed it was happening. At this point, Kiev would have to win the war decisively for Nato to come back. Arms, slogans, decorations and verbal support, even a mini-Nato in Galicia, don’t count – they are an order of magnitude less significant that what was going happen.
Ze. was negotiating in March what was a de facto surrender – so again I was right. He was told to cut it out, a decision he will probably come to regret. And lots of people run away – literally millions, why would you deny that?
I was not, you are making it up (you couldn’t even find a quote remotely saying that). I said the war will slow down the Western economies – and it did: 2023 official projection of EU is 0.6% growth, UK 0.1%, Germany 0.3% – the numbers are squishy since the min positives are achieved by under-stating inflation (easy thing to do)
I remember everyone predicting Russia’s economy collapse and it didn’t happen, its GNP dropped by 3%. For 2023 IMF has Russia growing 0.3% – better than Germany or UK.
The real collapse happened in Ukraine, 30% down (some of it lost lands, but no a big part).
Overall you prefer to create a straw-man to discussing reality or what others say. You may also be the last person who pushes the ‘Russia blew up North Stream’, but whatever. The war has tipped in Russia’s favor, I don’t see a realistic Ukie response (maybe you do). But for the sake decency don’t misrepresent what others say. If you like to argue w yourself, why are you here?
For everyone else, those who want a profoundly credible account of how the war is being fought on the front lines, here's an American professional recounting his 10 months. For those who know anything about this subject, his words will be extremely revealing and probably confirming.
For those, like Beckow, for whom they were always right, and everything is just as planned, devalue the guy all you want, but his account is measured and detailed, rather than vague and bombastic.
https://podcastaddict.com/episode/153032226Replies: @Beckow
But I did. I wrote about the “patriotic pensioners” using this war as a compensation mechanism for their neurotic complexes. But they are not the only ones. Борьба была ровна – боролись два г☆вна…
Anyway, you know that I like you LatW. No need to go full Latvian Rifelman on me for pointing some of your evident and natural biases.
Bonne Saint Valentin ma belle !
🙂
How are you trying to argue that you’ve not been wrong all year? You’re bizarre! This shows where I get people wrong. I understand they have their insecurities, but I always struggle to imagine how controlling those insecurities can be of them. Unfortunately, I am not constitutionally built to get it. Just to see the best in them and point the way.
For everyone else, those who want a profoundly credible account of how the war is being fought on the front lines, here’s an American professional recounting his 10 months. For those who know anything about this subject, his words will be extremely revealing and probably confirming.
For those, like Beckow, for whom they were always right, and everything is just as planned, devalue the guy all you want, but his account is measured and detailed, rather than vague and bombastic.
https://podcastaddict.com/episode/153032226
Yes, if the Russian invasion didn’t fail completely, as it has. I began the war too negative on Ukraine and presented a worst case option. Given that I was talking to people who thought Russian was winning a decisive victory, when it was flailing around, this was a sensible way of hedging my bets.
See what I did with Lukashenko and the Belarussians supposedly invading Ukraine. It was the same back then.
What full scale (not lab scale) Thorium reactor was discontinued in the U.S.?
____
THTR was a mixed solid U235 + Thorium “Pebble Bed Reactor” [PBR]. This has huge disadvantages versus LFTR. For example, the thorium cycle produces gases such as krypton. The LFTR can shed these gas from the operating fluid. Solid pebbles cannot. There were also science errors in the design of the pebble — small & light enough to escape the bed.
Ultimately, the German THTR was killed by the German Green party for political reasons. However, the poor choice & design of PBR plus related economics made it a pretty easy target for a take down.
I do not remember news about an issue. It was a limited duration experimental scale system. (1)
My understanding is that it completed it limited period test and concluded as expected.
If a major warhead decrease is in the cards, this concept could return. However, that seems unlikely in this geopolitical era. Without “free” plutonium, the economics of the Norwegian test did not warrant commercialization.
I am not sure where you got this bit of crazy from, but it is not scientifically sound. You have been mislead or deceived.
Clean FLiBe salt can be handled with modern materials in the Hastelloy series. Removing unwanted fission products is included in every serious LFTR proposal. Incidentally, this also reconditions the FLiBe salt back to its optimum clean state.
LCTR fast neutron reactor concepts do exist in the literature, however the chloride salts are more problematic versus their fluoride brethren. Liquid lead seems to be the most attractive option for this route if desired. A few nutters, funded by GE, promote liquid sodium PRISM. Guess who owns the PRISM design? Could it be GE?
There has been no repeated mothballing. Again, you have been mislead or deceived.
There has been only one commercial scale retirement. And, it was a poorly chosen & executed solid fuel design. Thus, not insightful to the LFTR concept.
The military used cold war muscle to kill the early, government funded, LFTR work at ORNL and a few other locations. This kill shot was based on poor science, but it happened nonetheless in the quest for weapons grade plutonium.
After that, the problem was more bureaucracy than military. All of the civilian laws & regulations had the U235 fuel cycle as a built in assumption. How would a thorium breeder be certified for operation when the rules expect something different? The red tape made it impossible. Also, all of the industry experts had a vested interest in keeping upstart competitors at bay.
The desire for Small Modular Reactors [SMR] forced the regulators to open their committees to new ideas. And, LFTR is an excellent SMR option due to passive safety.
You can read much more here:
https://energyfromthorium.com/lftr-overview/
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/160131-thorium-nuclear-reactor-trial-begins-could-provide-cleaner-safer-almost-waste-free-energy
For everyone else, those who want a profoundly credible account of how the war is being fought on the front lines, here's an American professional recounting his 10 months. For those who know anything about this subject, his words will be extremely revealing and probably confirming.
For those, like Beckow, for whom they were always right, and everything is just as planned, devalue the guy all you want, but his account is measured and detailed, rather than vague and bombastic.
https://podcastaddict.com/episode/153032226Replies: @Beckow
Your emotional mumbo-jumbo is an admission that you lost the argument. Nobody cares about your pop-psychology. You just make a fool of yourself.
The points I made were substantial and you didn’t address them. When you lose, you run, it must be the Anglo thing. Russia’s economy didn’t collapse and the Western one slowed down. Russia squashed any realistic plan of Ukraine in Nato – and as of now, Russia is winning the war: 20% of territory, initiative, Ukies’ terrible casualties…
You are unable to address it so you hide behind happy talk ‘Kiev is winning’. It seems an Anglo affliction – you can’t accept ‘losing’ and you will make up things, create myths, lie, anything but face reality. It is your ‘marketing’ identity – you are always selling something…
Anyway, you know that I like you LatW. No need to go full Latvian Rifelman on me for pointing some of your evident and natural biases.
Bonne Saint Valentin ma belle !
🙂Replies: @LatW
Toi aussi!
I urge you to follow your own advice here. The war between Ukraine and Russia is not really all that complicated, and there’s really no reason to look for answers and causes within elaborately made up conspiracy theories etc. Believe me, it is what it looks like. You have a disgruntled player in this war (Russia) that thought that it had an invincible army, and that it was losing Ukraine to the West, and that this was the last optimal time to attack and subdue Ukraine and bring it back into the fold. How was Ukraine to react to this provocation? Quietly acquiesce to Russia’s brazen invasion, in order to maximize good Slavic DNA for future generations, while handing over the keys to its house to a really lousy neighbor?
😄Replies: @Mr. Hack
Ahem, now that Bashi has decided that treacherous “White Women” and not only Jews are responsible for the Wests decline, I think this is the perfect moment to talk about…..food! (The politics here can’t get any sillier lol).
Since returning from my trip I’ve become obsessed with Thai food, and to a lesser extent Japanese food. I’ve always enjoyed Thai food, but was never really that interested in it for some reason. I always preferred Indian food.
What is hitting me right now about Asian food is it’s intense umami flavor – I don’t know why that’s hitting me hard now. I mean, I love Italian, French, Arabic food, but something about the sheer intensity of Asian food right now is really hitting home. Maybe it’s just a phase.
Also, in the past few years there has been a revolution in ingredient availability – off Amazon, you can get all the Thai sauces you see street vendors use straight from Thailand. And, it turns out, these dishes are incredibly easy to make!
The intense, complex flavor appears to come not from some subtle skill in mixing diverse ingredients (well, some dishes do), but largely from the process of fermentation – which is really just aging and bio organisms, which I like. It’s Nature. (some skill in mixing ingredients is called for).
For instance, one of the best and most iconic Thai dishes that everyone loves – basil stir fry – only has garlic and chillies, then a sauce composed of fish sauce, oyster sauce, soy sauce, and sugar, and basil.(and your choice of meat).
But the fermented fish sauce, oyster sauce, and even soy sauce – has incredible intensity and complexity developed through the process of natural aging.
Japanese beef gyudon, which is thinly sliced fatty beef simmered, on rice, uses just soy sauce, mirin, and fish stock. But the incredible fermentation of the fish stock, the wine, the soy – it does everything!
Japanese ginger pork, another incredible dish, uses just ginger, mirin, and soy sauce – yet what deep, complex, intense flavor.
To be sure, much good Italian food is also incredibly simple and uses just a few really good ingredients. Or a good aged Spanish chorizo is just pork, garlic and paprika and salt. Simple! And what is Reggiano Parmesano but just beautifully fermented milk?
It seems that the process of aging is what makes human food incredibly deep and rich and complex – cooperating with nature, as it were. Maybe that’s why processed industrial food is so awful – it doesn’t let nature do it’s thing?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Emma_Goldman_seated.jpg
🙂
And it is not politics but anthropology!
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review/article/abs/gumilev-mystique-biopolitics-eurasianism-and-the-construction-of-community-in-modern-russia-by-mark-bassin-ithaca-cornell-university-press-2016-xiv-380-pp-bibliography-index-8995-hard-bound-2995-paper/39EA530150C55D0E65816A5AAE6E9E96
Read that while you munch on your gefilte fish.
😏Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @HeavilyMarbledSteak
It is amazing how our taste palette has changed since that time, despite living in similar environment/climate to ancient Romans.Replies: @HeavilyMarbledSteak
I think these experiments were dropped for political reasons, not technical.
+++
The “fizzle” was 22 kT, not exactly hopeless.
IIRC, the original idea for the MSRE was to remove most all of the protactinum-232 continuously from the salt bath to to improve neutron economy by avoiding losses on protactinum in the reactor. This removal was demonstrated during the experiment. The removed material decays into U-233 which is returned to the reactor as the fuel. But during this stage it exists outside the reactor as high purity U-233 which could be diverted. I think it has less U-232 than material bred in a conventional reactor and the critical mass is lower than U-235. There is low spontaneous neutron generation so a small gun-type bomb could be made, much simpler than an implosion design. This is the story I read.
The ways to address this issue include good security control over the extracted U-233 (high trust society), set up a process that denatures it immediately or design a reactor that does not remove the Pa-232 from the reactor. I think the last is the route chosen for new designs, but the reactor design is less “elegant”.
I don’t know if they (Russian Politicos) reckon themselves to be invincible. They did expect a coup in Kiev and then to hide under their nuclear umbrella if things go wrong.
+++
The "fizzle" was 22 kT, not exactly hopeless.
IIRC, the original idea for the MSRE was to remove most all of the protactinum-232 continuously from the salt bath to to improve neutron economy by avoiding losses on protactinum in the reactor. This removal was demonstrated during the experiment. The removed material decays into U-233 which is returned to the reactor as the fuel. But during this stage it exists outside the reactor as high purity U-233 which could be diverted. I think it has less U-232 than material bred in a conventional reactor and the critical mass is lower than U-235. There is low spontaneous neutron generation so a small gun-type bomb could be made, much simpler than an implosion design. This is the story I read.
The ways to address this issue include good security control over the extracted U-233 (high trust society), set up a process that denatures it immediately or design a reactor that does not remove the Pa-232 from the reactor. I think the last is the route chosen for new designs, but the reactor design is less "elegant".Replies: @QCIC
Oops. Should have written protactinium-233/ pa-233 instead of 232. 🙁
Ukraine is erasing the Russian language and culture on its territory, in accordance with the will of a majority of its people; ethnic Ukrainian kids are learning in their own language now.
Russia is erasing towns and thousands of Russian-speaking people.
An honest person would admit which action is closer to genocide.
It has increased since the war as companies have moved from places like Kharkiv and many more of Ukraine’s 200,000 IT workers have transferred to Lviv:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/22/business/ukraine-tech-companies-putin.html
The entire country of Slovakia only has 28k such workers:
https://www.itminions.be/en/blog/slovakia-tech-talent-goldmine
“Call center work” isn’t IT customer support.
The average wage in Slovakia is less than a thousand Euros per month. So those 35,000 + new arrivals programmers in Lviv are making 3 times the average Slovak wage per month, in a city with a very low cost of living. They are living quite well.
Average German wage is about the same as the average Lviv programmer wage.
And programmers in Bratislava make no more than do programmers in Lviv:
http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?loc=2226&loctype=3&job=3&jobtype=2
Given the Lviv us cheaper, the guys in Lviv do better than their Slovak colleagues.
1. That was started by Russians when they crossed the border into Ukraine with their volunteers and weapons. Girkin and Pavlov weren’t Ukrainians.
2. The Russian mass invasion and murder spree began in 2022, 7 years after 2015. Its already a separate event.
And now you lie and claim that is “okay” by me.
A difference between NATO and Russia is that Russia kills far more Slavs though.
No one is touching obnoxious but tiny North Korea, and everyone tolerates it’s missile overflies over places like Japan. But you think NATO would dare invade Russia?
NATO would forever keep Russia’s hands off Ukraine. This is why Russia doesn’t want NATO there. It wants to reabsorb Ukraine. NATO itself is secondary to the main problem for Russia, which is the eternal loss of Ukraine. Russia would seek to end Ukraine even when – as was the case prior to invasion – NATO membership was very unlikely.
Now you’ve slipped and admitted that the problem wasn’t exactly NATO, but Ukraine.
Finns btw don’t like Russia either and have stronger claims on Russian territory than Ukrainians do. You keep bringing up Volyn from 80 years ago but now you’ve conveniently forgotten what Finland had been up to at that time.
Like in 2008? No war then and Yushchenko was president. But it didn’t happen. Nor did it in every year since then.
Your type like to conveniently change your story. First you brag about how by seizing Crimea and Donbas, Russia has blocked Ukraine from getting into NATO. Brilliant chess move by Putin! But now when you need a pending NATO membership as an excuse for a full invasion and attempt at regime change, that becomes irrelevant.
Your hypocrisy and mendacity on display again and as usual. It also shows how undignified it is, to always lick the Russian boot as you do.
NATO is more in Ukraine now than it ever has been.
If true, pretty stupid planning – look what a mess that they’re in today.
Russia is erasing towns and thousands of Russian-speaking people.
An honest person would admit which action is closer to genocide. It has increased since the war as companies have moved from places like Kharkiv and many more of Ukraine’s 200,000 IT workers have transferred to Lviv:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/22/business/ukraine-tech-companies-putin.html
The entire country of Slovakia only has 28k such workers:
https://www.itminions.be/en/blog/slovakia-tech-talent-goldmine “Call center work” isn’t IT customer support. The average wage in Slovakia is less than a thousand Euros per month. So those 35,000 + new arrivals programmers in Lviv are making 3 times the average Slovak wage per month, in a city with a very low cost of living. They are living quite well.
Average German wage is about the same as the average Lviv programmer wage.
And programmers in Bratislava make no more than do programmers in Lviv:
http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?loc=2226&loctype=3&job=3&jobtype=2
Given the Lviv us cheaper, the guys in Lviv do better than their Slovak colleagues. 1. That was started by Russians when they crossed the border into Ukraine with their volunteers and weapons. Girkin and Pavlov weren’t Ukrainians.
2. The Russian mass invasion and murder spree began in 2022, 7 years after 2015. Its already a separate event. And now you lie and claim that is “okay” by me.
A difference between NATO and Russia is that Russia kills far more Slavs though. No one is touching obnoxious but tiny North Korea, and everyone tolerates it’s missile overflies over places like Japan. But you think NATO would dare invade Russia?
NATO would forever keep Russia’s hands off Ukraine. This is why Russia doesn’t want NATO there. It wants to reabsorb Ukraine. NATO itself is secondary to the main problem for Russia, which is the eternal loss of Ukraine. Russia would seek to end Ukraine even when - as was the case prior to invasion - NATO membership was very unlikely. Now you’ve slipped and admitted that the problem wasn’t exactly NATO, but Ukraine.
Finns btw don’t like Russia either and have stronger claims on Russian territory than Ukrainians do. You keep bringing up Volyn from 80 years ago but now you’ve conveniently forgotten what Finland had been up to at that time. Like in 2008? No war then and Yushchenko was president. But it didn’t happen. Nor did it in every year since then. Your type like to conveniently change your story. First you brag about how by seizing Crimea and Donbas, Russia has blocked Ukraine from getting into NATO. Brilliant chess move by Putin! But now when you need a pending NATO membership as an excuse for a full invasion and attempt at regime change, that becomes irrelevant.
Your hypocrisy and mendacity on display again and as usual. It also shows how undignified it is, to always lick the Russian boot as you do. NATO is more in Ukraine now than it ever has been.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Beckow
There’s now a case to be made, after the confirmation of the NS2 bombing that this entire war caper is designed to make sure Germany and Russia form no grand strategic alliance. You sound like a Pollack in 1938. The world didn’t revolve around the clucking Polish back then and it doesn’t revolve around posturing Ukrainians today. Great tectonic plates are moving and Ukraine as the name suggests is just a faultline. Poland as the name suggests just an empty field.
NS2 was not destroyed. Only NS1. Russia has literally said so. You guys are nuts.
3/4 of the carrying capacity was exploded away.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @A123
Exactly. You said it better than I could.
And meek acquiescence to the status of dhimmitude at the hands of track-suited Chechen gangsters under their Muscovite khan wouldn’t be a good demonstration of the fitness of the DNA they are supposed to be preserving.
The steadfast stubbornness in defending one’s families and homes from the invader reflects a universally positive attribute that is very noble in nature, despite the situation itself being horrible.
Why would an intelligent man such as yourself, write such a collection of self-righteous clichés.
🙄
Pynya the Muscovite khan...
LOL !
How should we call Zelya then?
The Kievan Khazarian Khagan ?
😉Replies: @AP
____THTR was a mixed solid U235 + Thorium "Pebble Bed Reactor" [PBR]. This has huge disadvantages versus LFTR. For example, the thorium cycle produces gases such as krypton. The LFTR can shed these gas from the operating fluid. Solid pebbles cannot. There were also science errors in the design of the pebble -- small & light enough to escape the bed.Ultimately, the German THTR was killed by the German Green party for political reasons. However, the poor choice & design of PBR plus related economics made it a pretty easy target for a take down. I do not remember news about an issue. It was a limited duration experimental scale system. (1) My understanding is that it completed it limited period test and concluded as expected.If a major warhead decrease is in the cards, this concept could return. However, that seems unlikely in this geopolitical era. Without "free" plutonium, the economics of the Norwegian test did not warrant commercialization. I am not sure where you got this bit of crazy from, but it is not scientifically sound. You have been mislead or deceived. Clean FLiBe salt can be handled with modern materials in the Hastelloy series. Removing unwanted fission products is included in every serious LFTR proposal. Incidentally, this also reconditions the FLiBe salt back to its optimum clean state. LCTR fast neutron reactor concepts do exist in the literature, however the chloride salts are more problematic versus their fluoride brethren. Liquid lead seems to be the most attractive option for this route if desired. A few nutters, funded by GE, promote liquid sodium PRISM. Guess who owns the PRISM design? Could it be GE? There has been no repeated mothballing. Again, you have been mislead or deceived. There has been only one commercial scale retirement. And, it was a poorly chosen & executed solid fuel design. Thus, not insightful to the LFTR concept. The military used cold war muscle to kill the early, government funded, LFTR work at ORNL and a few other locations. This kill shot was based on poor science, but it happened nonetheless in the quest for weapons grade plutonium.After that, the problem was more bureaucracy than military. All of the civilian laws & regulations had the U235 fuel cycle as a built in assumption. How would a thorium breeder be certified for operation when the rules expect something different? The red tape made it impossible. Also, all of the industry experts had a vested interest in keeping upstart competitors at bay.The desire for Small Modular Reactors [SMR] forced the regulators to open their committees to new ideas. And, LFTR is an excellent SMR option due to passive safety. You can read much more here:https://energyfromthorium.com/lftr-overview/PEACE 😇
__________(1) https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/160131-thorium-nuclear-reactor-trial-begins-could-provide-cleaner-safer-almost-waste-free-energyReplies: @Another Polish Perspective
If small, experimental reactors are failing, we could expect even more failure from commercial ones…
The Halden incident was heavily covered-up when it happened. I remember reading on it in real time on some French site (in English though) monitoring radiation, which claimed it was about thorium.
The official news from Oct 2016 avoid for some strange reason (lobbying, perhaps) any characterization of “fuel”, but make clear that it was a fuel problem:
https://www-news.iaea.org/ErfView.aspx?mId=8566e7fd-88e6-458c-b487-d51dde9b1049
We can get it was thorium because the experiment started in Jul 2016:
http://www.thoriumenergyworld.com/news/second-thorium-fuel-test-round-started
There was no follow-up to this experiment, which means it was a failure.
Experiments are done to discover problems before commercial scale. A shutdown event/incident is far from a catastrophe. It is industry jargon. It was clearly not an insurmountable issue. It ran for years after the 2016 event you cited. (1) 2018 was the intended research end-date I cited in my previous post, so it lasted the length of its grant.
Also, it was not a LFTR. A solid fuel technology problem is not directly tied to liquid fuel solutions. Though it is informative. No.
Successful projects often lose out on 2nd & 3rd round finding for political reasons. Sad. But True.
____
I looked at the crazy fear site that you cited earlier: It has not been updated since April 2016. According to your own logic, updates have been discontinued. Therefore, it is no longer in operation and thus is *by your own definition* a failure.
I did skim it briefly. Most of the panic is over "Thorium as a carcinogen". While true, the hysteria on the site was quite sad. Given that Thorium comes out of the ground as waste from rare earth mining, getting rid of the waste by destroying via fuel use it makes the situation better.
Most of the other points I saw are known and admitted inconveniences. Not disqualifying barriers. The primary impediments are governmental and emotional, not scientific or engineering.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://ife.no/en/project/the-halden-reactor-project/Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
The German government know who is to blame, and they don’t think it is the Americans, hence them massively increasing their support to Ukraine and allying even more solidly with the Americans:
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday offered to resume gas supplies to Europe through the intact part of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.
“The ball is in the EU’s court. If they want to, then the taps can be turned on and that’s it,” he said in a speech at an energy forum in Moscow.
Germany, however, said it would not take Russian gas via the Nord Stream 2 pipeline that has become a flashpoint in the Ukraine crisis.
Asked if Berlin would rule out the use of Nord Stream 2, German government spokeswoman Christiane Hoffmann said, “Yes.”
“Independently of the possible sabotage of the two pipelines, we have seen that Russia is no longer a reliable energy supplier, and that even before the damage to Nord Stream 1 there was no longer any gas flowing,” Hoffmann told reporters.
https://www.dw.com/en/putin-offers-europe-gas-through-nord-stream-2-germany-declines/a-63416138
Since returning from my trip I've become obsessed with Thai food, and to a lesser extent Japanese food. I've always enjoyed Thai food, but was never really that interested in it for some reason. I always preferred Indian food.
What is hitting me right now about Asian food is it's intense umami flavor - I don't know why that's hitting me hard now. I mean, I love Italian, French, Arabic food, but something about the sheer intensity of Asian food right now is really hitting home. Maybe it's just a phase.
Also, in the past few years there has been a revolution in ingredient availability - off Amazon, you can get all the Thai sauces you see street vendors use straight from Thailand. And, it turns out, these dishes are incredibly easy to make!
The intense, complex flavor appears to come not from some subtle skill in mixing diverse ingredients (well, some dishes do), but largely from the process of fermentation - which is really just aging and bio organisms, which I like. It's Nature. (some skill in mixing ingredients is called for).
For instance, one of the best and most iconic Thai dishes that everyone loves - basil stir fry - only has garlic and chillies, then a sauce composed of fish sauce, oyster sauce, soy sauce, and sugar, and basil.(and your choice of meat).
But the fermented fish sauce, oyster sauce, and even soy sauce - has incredible intensity and complexity developed through the process of natural aging.
Japanese beef gyudon, which is thinly sliced fatty beef simmered, on rice, uses just soy sauce, mirin, and fish stock. But the incredible fermentation of the fish stock, the wine, the soy - it does everything!
Japanese ginger pork, another incredible dish, uses just ginger, mirin, and soy sauce - yet what deep, complex, intense flavor.
To be sure, much good Italian food is also incredibly simple and uses just a few really good ingredients. Or a good aged Spanish chorizo is just pork, garlic and paprika and salt. Simple! And what is Reggiano Parmesano but just beautifully fermented milk?
It seems that the process of aging is what makes human food incredibly deep and rich and complex - cooperating with nature, as it were. Maybe that's why processed industrial food is so awful - it doesn't let nature do it's thing?Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Ivashka the fool, @Another Polish Perspective
I’ve been a big fan of Thai food for at least 15 years, and before that Chinese and Vietnamese. I’ve probably been to at least half of all of the Thai restaurants in the Phoenix area (and that’s saying a lot!). I really enjoy Thai curry dishes, but am also quite acquainted with their eggplant and more “umami” type of dishes too (have you ever tasted Thai “Tom Kha Gai” soup? the only soup that gives Ukrainian borshch a run for the money, yum!). Covid put the quash on one of m favorite Thai restaurants here, closing their all you can eat buffet. $12.95 for a trip to culinary heaven. I think of you whenever I put some curry powder in my boiling white rice – thanks for the tip! 🙂
What you eat on the streets of Bangkok is most of the time quite different - much more intense and spicy!
Which is not to say you aren't getting some idea of the incredible flavors of Thai food in America, and even if very different it can be good in it's own right (perhaps it can be a new cuisine :) )
One must travel to Thailand or make it oneself to get the real deal, alas. However, curries are closest to what you find in Thailand, so you can enjoy that in Phoenix :)
Vietnamese can be quite good too and more authentic - there used to be this chain of bread and Ban Mhi shops in Phoenix that I thought was quite decent for a chain - Lees Bakery, maybe? I don't quite remember - I ate at it in Scottsdale once.
NYC has a lot of really good Banh Mi shops :)
Believe it or not, I've never had Borscht before - but recently I was in a part of Brooklyn that had a community from Tashkent, and I picked up a prepared Borscht soup completely on a whim - I have to confess, it was amazing! I was quite surprised. The sour flavors were unexpected but perfect. Thai soups can be excellent too.
Here's to fermentation and the contribution it makes to deliciousness.Replies: @Mr. Hack
Since returning from my trip I've become obsessed with Thai food, and to a lesser extent Japanese food. I've always enjoyed Thai food, but was never really that interested in it for some reason. I always preferred Indian food.
What is hitting me right now about Asian food is it's intense umami flavor - I don't know why that's hitting me hard now. I mean, I love Italian, French, Arabic food, but something about the sheer intensity of Asian food right now is really hitting home. Maybe it's just a phase.
Also, in the past few years there has been a revolution in ingredient availability - off Amazon, you can get all the Thai sauces you see street vendors use straight from Thailand. And, it turns out, these dishes are incredibly easy to make!
The intense, complex flavor appears to come not from some subtle skill in mixing diverse ingredients (well, some dishes do), but largely from the process of fermentation - which is really just aging and bio organisms, which I like. It's Nature. (some skill in mixing ingredients is called for).
For instance, one of the best and most iconic Thai dishes that everyone loves - basil stir fry - only has garlic and chillies, then a sauce composed of fish sauce, oyster sauce, soy sauce, and sugar, and basil.(and your choice of meat).
But the fermented fish sauce, oyster sauce, and even soy sauce - has incredible intensity and complexity developed through the process of natural aging.
Japanese beef gyudon, which is thinly sliced fatty beef simmered, on rice, uses just soy sauce, mirin, and fish stock. But the incredible fermentation of the fish stock, the wine, the soy - it does everything!
Japanese ginger pork, another incredible dish, uses just ginger, mirin, and soy sauce - yet what deep, complex, intense flavor.
To be sure, much good Italian food is also incredibly simple and uses just a few really good ingredients. Or a good aged Spanish chorizo is just pork, garlic and paprika and salt. Simple! And what is Reggiano Parmesano but just beautifully fermented milk?
It seems that the process of aging is what makes human food incredibly deep and rich and complex - cooperating with nature, as it were. Maybe that's why processed industrial food is so awful - it doesn't let nature do it's thing?Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Ivashka the fool, @Another Polish Perspective
Treacherous (((White))) women !
🙂
And it is not politics but anthropology!
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review/article/abs/gumilev-mystique-biopolitics-eurasianism-and-the-construction-of-community-in-modern-russia-by-mark-bassin-ithaca-cornell-university-press-2016-xiv-380-pp-bibliography-index-8995-hard-bound-2995-paper/39EA530150C55D0E65816A5AAE6E9E96
Read that while you munch on your gefilte fish.
😏
So you were talking about White women, who betrayed, whereas White men were only guilty of a naive complacency, poor things. (One wonders where you situate all those White male philosophers, artists, and thinkers who advanced the cause of decadence - like Macdonald, they seem invisible to you in the story of Western decline :) )
Do you remember commenter Rosie? She was this female White nationalist who used to post on Audacious Epigones blog, and often Sailers and other blogs. She was intelligent and rather inoffensive, I thought, but for some reason she was viciously persecuted by the boys on that on other parts of this site. I never really understood why they hated her so. She hated Jews, but even I wasn't as mean to her as they were.
But as a general principle, I once tried explaining to her that once you let the genie of "othering" out of the bottle, it does not stop at gender. In fact, gender is one of the primary divisions and examples of "othering" available to the human species - each gender is rather mysterious and confusing to the other, lol.
A society that hates Jews and minorities is going to be misogynistic, simply because all "others" are suspect to the majority power holders. And it's no accident that women's liberation went in tandem with anti-racism.
Can there be a "sweet spot" for "othering", so that you limit it to other races but not to the opposite gender? So far signs are not promising, and I don't know. Can one fine tune these things I winder. Maybe.
But I guess we shall see :) All sorts of interesting anthropological experiments are beginning to take place - no group identity has ever in the past been founded primarily on race, but that is being attempted to.
We shall see.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Of course this letter is a fake, why would the Germans prosecute an Ukie for wearing SS insignia anyway? The Germans already know who they are training here. Good Russian trolling.
Cyberspec1 is a fun twitter feed to follow. Heavy Russian bias but it’s a good mood barometer, with no crazy swings of uncalled for despair and elation.
О Господи…
Why would an intelligent man such as yourself, write such a collection of self-righteous clichés.
🙄
Pynya the Muscovite khan…
LOL !
How should we call Zelya then?
The Kievan Khazarian Khagan ?
😉
These two political ways are incompatible, and thus the deadly friction until there is a permanent break and Russia leave Ukraine alone, and focuses eastward.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool
Mr Hack, simple-minded doesn’t mean stupid.
😄
Hey friend, I'm only trying to have a good conversation with you - I expect better from you!Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Since returning from my trip I've become obsessed with Thai food, and to a lesser extent Japanese food. I've always enjoyed Thai food, but was never really that interested in it for some reason. I always preferred Indian food.
What is hitting me right now about Asian food is it's intense umami flavor - I don't know why that's hitting me hard now. I mean, I love Italian, French, Arabic food, but something about the sheer intensity of Asian food right now is really hitting home. Maybe it's just a phase.
Also, in the past few years there has been a revolution in ingredient availability - off Amazon, you can get all the Thai sauces you see street vendors use straight from Thailand. And, it turns out, these dishes are incredibly easy to make!
The intense, complex flavor appears to come not from some subtle skill in mixing diverse ingredients (well, some dishes do), but largely from the process of fermentation - which is really just aging and bio organisms, which I like. It's Nature. (some skill in mixing ingredients is called for).
For instance, one of the best and most iconic Thai dishes that everyone loves - basil stir fry - only has garlic and chillies, then a sauce composed of fish sauce, oyster sauce, soy sauce, and sugar, and basil.(and your choice of meat).
But the fermented fish sauce, oyster sauce, and even soy sauce - has incredible intensity and complexity developed through the process of natural aging.
Japanese beef gyudon, which is thinly sliced fatty beef simmered, on rice, uses just soy sauce, mirin, and fish stock. But the incredible fermentation of the fish stock, the wine, the soy - it does everything!
Japanese ginger pork, another incredible dish, uses just ginger, mirin, and soy sauce - yet what deep, complex, intense flavor.
To be sure, much good Italian food is also incredibly simple and uses just a few really good ingredients. Or a good aged Spanish chorizo is just pork, garlic and paprika and salt. Simple! And what is Reggiano Parmesano but just beautifully fermented milk?
It seems that the process of aging is what makes human food incredibly deep and rich and complex - cooperating with nature, as it were. Maybe that's why processed industrial food is so awful - it doesn't let nature do it's thing?Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Ivashka the fool, @Another Polish Perspective
was very popular in ancient Roman cuisine, and was known as garum.
It is amazing how our taste palette has changed since that time, despite living in similar environment/climate to ancient Romans.
It's remarkable that we've completely lost this in the West, but most of Asia uses fish sauce. I am a huge fan of it.
In fact, I was first introduced to it years ago in SEA by two Italian travelers I met who described it as "liquid parmesan"" :) That's what induced me to try it, as the idea of fermented anchovies did not initially appeal to my simplistic American palate.
The real question is why Americans and Geemanics are known for only liking bland food? There is some very good food in northern Europe and America, of course, but we do have a blandness issue we just overcome.
May Garum return once again to the West!
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Emma_Goldman_seated.jpg
🙂
And it is not politics but anthropology!
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review/article/abs/gumilev-mystique-biopolitics-eurasianism-and-the-construction-of-community-in-modern-russia-by-mark-bassin-ithaca-cornell-university-press-2016-xiv-380-pp-bibliography-index-8995-hard-bound-2995-paper/39EA530150C55D0E65816A5AAE6E9E96
Read that while you munch on your gefilte fish.
😏Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @HeavilyMarbledSteak
Don’t let yourself slide into this rabbit hole. You may never escape and then you’ll end up like every other lunatic who descended into that world of projection and delusion. Unhappy, bitter and unable to recognise yourself. It might be a necessary path for you, but there are easier ways ones should you design to choose them. If you can read between the lines of my comments and have the level of spiritual understanding which you communicate sometimes, you’ll know that I give good advice in this area. Or at least that it is worth genuine consideration.
I am learning to hate no one. Karma will take care of everyone equally, me included. We will all be sorted out.
I agree with Greasy here, it's not even worth trying to level the scores. Quite the opposite. Let it go to its logical conclusions, let it accelerate.
It is about time the circus lights go off...
https://youtu.be/_T6GhYdwI7g
Poland is building what will be the strongest military in Europe, and Ukraine if it endures will be its equal and close partner. The reemergence of a powerful version of the PLC will probably be the most important European geopolitical event in 150 years. No wonder the Germans are dragging their feet.
Could be wrong, but I don't really see how Balts would want to be culturally and politically swamped by some much bigger country.
Or are you imagining it, without them?Replies: @LatW
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/IlkhanidHorseArcher.jpghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adil_GirayCrimean Khan. "In 1666 he was placed on the throne by the Ottomans, who were displeased with khan Mehmed IV. At the time he was in exile at Rhodes. He came into conflict with his nobles, especially the Shirin clan, because of his Polish ancestry and high taxes. It is said he strongly supported the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, and was one of the candidates in the Polish royal election of 1669". Let's not even get into the list of Polish girls in the Istanbul Harem over the centuries.
Them disappearing will include (P~.98) totalitarian control on your consumption of wine, t-bone steak, cannabis, gasoline, heating and cooling energy, and an ad infinitum of consumer goods.
Also your speech. They would control your thoughts if they had the power to do so. Attempting to control our thoughts will consume an increasing fraction of resources.
Ted Kaczynski had a better plan and his plan was retarded.
Ah, Mr Hack, American Thai restaurants can be quite good, but they are notorious for changing the flavor to suit American palates!
What you eat on the streets of Bangkok is most of the time quite different – much more intense and spicy!
Which is not to say you aren’t getting some idea of the incredible flavors of Thai food in America, and even if very different it can be good in it’s own right (perhaps it can be a new cuisine 🙂 )
One must travel to Thailand or make it oneself to get the real deal, alas. However, curries are closest to what you find in Thailand, so you can enjoy that in Phoenix 🙂
Vietnamese can be quite good too and more authentic – there used to be this chain of bread and Ban Mhi shops in Phoenix that I thought was quite decent for a chain – Lees Bakery, maybe? I don’t quite remember – I ate at it in Scottsdale once.
NYC has a lot of really good Banh Mi shops 🙂
Believe it or not, I’ve never had Borscht before – but recently I was in a part of Brooklyn that had a community from Tashkent, and I picked up a prepared Borscht soup completely on a whim – I have to confess, it was amazing! I was quite surprised. The sour flavors were unexpected but perfect. Thai soups can be excellent too.
Here’s to fermentation and the contribution it makes to deliciousness.
Are you sure that is not how you became a tranny?
I was hoping you would actually give us your definition of masculinity. Does your idea of it not have any fixed qualities?
Why so anti-religious? Thought that there were a lot of churches and synagogues accepting gays and trannies now.
Zimbardo (one of your party who fell into disrepute) outright said that he didn’t believe in a soul. IIRC, you said you did (probably a dodge to avoid the stigma of not believing in one), but your strange attempt to redefine masculinity seems to show you don’t, which is further underlined by your professed belief that you can dissect anyone’s brain and see inside their thoughts. Not guess (which everyone enjoys doing), but actually observe their inner self, and then change it. Not just one person that you have rapport with, but anyone here.
I think there is something Satanic in your confidence, and I don’t mind saying so. Maybe, it is simple narcissism, but compounded by new age beliefs.
https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/russias-attack-nord-stream-pipelines-means-putin-has-truly-weaponized
So you do take the Heritage Foundation Position that Russia blew up, I mean partially blew up, NS2 and NS1?
That’s your position.
Rather than the US did exactly what it threatened it would do to the pipelines a few times?
and then chuckled about leaks being under investigation and the bombing being “in No One’s interest”…
“steep discount on oil” goys…
You’ve no need to pretend that The Sullivan, Nuland & Blinken sabotage group didn’t do it. War in Ukraine was a mere pretext for the effort to separate out Russian and German business.
But I would be very surprised myself if Lukashenko sends Belarussian troops to Ukraine at this unfavorable stage. Putin may have most of the population behind him but Luka doesn't. That's why he finally had to align himself with the Kremlin in the first place. If even Putin is unwilling to take the mobilization measures that would allow him to put an end to the misadventure he started, will shrewd Lukashenko be willing to risk much more?Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @AnonfromTN
Luka is wily, or, to be exact, he is best described by my grandma’s phrase in Ukrainian “дурний, та хитрий” (stupid, but cunning). For many years he tried to maneuver between the RF, China, and the EU to maximize goodies Belarus gets from all sides (Belarus cannot live as well as it does on its own resources). However, the West made a strategic mistake in Belarus: instead of cultivating Luka and nudging him towards pro-Western position, the West attempted a color revolution against him. Luka is not a coward, like Ukrainian Yanuk, he did not surrender before the battle was lost, but fought back vigorously and prevailed. Net result: Western morons pushed him into Putin’s camp. Today Putin firmly holds his balls in his hand and can squeeze as hard as he needs. What’s more, now Luka has nothing to loose: Belarus is already under a bunch of idiotic Western sanctions. So, if Putin wants Belarus to join the RF in Ukraine, he is going to get his wish. Whether he wants it is another question.
However, it is possibly a good thing that the protests didn't go too far and eventually calmed down with no bloodbath. The average person in Belarus is probably better off under a dictatorial regime than in a state of chaos and armed conflict like their southern neighbors. Besides, it is not very clear that a Jeffersonian democracy is the optimal social arrangement among Eastern Slavs. I'm not sure it has ever worked very well there. His throne and maybe even his head if a stream of coffins starts coming to their families from Ukraine a few years after he showed the middle finger to the people who voted in the elections.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/03/Emma_Goldman_seated.jpg
🙂
And it is not politics but anthropology!
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/slavic-review/article/abs/gumilev-mystique-biopolitics-eurasianism-and-the-construction-of-community-in-modern-russia-by-mark-bassin-ithaca-cornell-university-press-2016-xiv-380-pp-bibliography-index-8995-hard-bound-2995-paper/39EA530150C55D0E65816A5AAE6E9E96
Read that while you munch on your gefilte fish.
😏Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @HeavilyMarbledSteak
Yes, we know the Jews, both male and female, are responsible – that much is obvious. But above you sounded a new note, that “their” women – the women of White men, whose only sin was being complacent – betrayed them.
So you were talking about White women, who betrayed, whereas White men were only guilty of a naive complacency, poor things. (One wonders where you situate all those White male philosophers, artists, and thinkers who advanced the cause of decadence – like Macdonald, they seem invisible to you in the story of Western decline 🙂 )
Do you remember commenter Rosie? She was this female White nationalist who used to post on Audacious Epigones blog, and often Sailers and other blogs. She was intelligent and rather inoffensive, I thought, but for some reason she was viciously persecuted by the boys on that on other parts of this site. I never really understood why they hated her so. She hated Jews, but even I wasn’t as mean to her as they were.
But as a general principle, I once tried explaining to her that once you let the genie of “othering” out of the bottle, it does not stop at gender. In fact, gender is one of the primary divisions and examples of “othering” available to the human species – each gender is rather mysterious and confusing to the other, lol.
A society that hates Jews and minorities is going to be misogynistic, simply because all “others” are suspect to the majority power holders. And it’s no accident that women’s liberation went in tandem with anti-racism.
Can there be a “sweet spot” for “othering”, so that you limit it to other races but not to the opposite gender? So far signs are not promising, and I don’t know. Can one fine tune these things I winder. Maybe.
But I guess we shall see 🙂 All sorts of interesting anthropological experiments are beginning to take place – no group identity has ever in the past been founded primarily on race, but that is being attempted to.
We shall see.
https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/bbb0b03df5094073b8ba258d71bd1ec7/3000.jpeg
Not yet human.
https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/rockcms/2022-06/220623-roe-v-wade-abortion-scotus-protest-2-se-805p-2ef18c.jpg
TFR ~ 1...
Divorce rate for an American marriage.
https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2020/07/Share-of-marriages-end-in-divorces-in-US-Stevenson-Wolfers-800x545.png
Sexual promiscuity.
https://cdn-adklk.nitrocdn.com/vAlLOcBPjCSUTuqFpgWoGejnngKOaInw/assets/images/optimized/rev-fc9d120/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Here_s-the-list-of-states-in-the-U.S.-with-the-highest-averages..jpg
Children born out of wedlock.
https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/figure14-w640.png
Happy St. Valentine's Day !Replies: @HeavilyMarbledSteak, @Another Polish Perspective, @Emil Nikola Richard
How popular is this idea in the Baltics? And in Ukraine?
Could be wrong, but I don’t really see how Balts would want to be culturally and politically swamped by some much bigger country.
Or are you imagining it, without them?
I'm not exactly sure I understand what you mean by "culturally and politically swamped". Everyone has their own country and culture, many of the political views are aligned, and it would be more about coordination, rather than creating a full on confederation. Substance and content is more important than formalities.Replies: @songbird
It is amazing how our taste palette has changed since that time, despite living in similar environment/climate to ancient Romans.Replies: @HeavilyMarbledSteak
Right, I’ve heard of this – I think it was as valued as gold, or something, to the Romans.
It’s remarkable that we’ve completely lost this in the West, but most of Asia uses fish sauce. I am a huge fan of it.
In fact, I was first introduced to it years ago in SEA by two Italian travelers I met who described it as “liquid parmesan”” 🙂 That’s what induced me to try it, as the idea of fermented anchovies did not initially appeal to my simplistic American palate.
The real question is why Americans and Geemanics are known for only liking bland food? There is some very good food in northern Europe and America, of course, but we do have a blandness issue we just overcome.
May Garum return once again to the West!
No.
Experiments are done to discover problems before commercial scale.
A shutdown event/incident is far from a catastrophe. It is industry jargon. It was clearly not an insurmountable issue. It ran for years after the 2016 event you cited. (1)
2018 was the intended research end-date I cited in my previous post, so it lasted the length of its grant.
Also, it was not a LFTR. A solid fuel technology problem is not directly tied to liquid fuel solutions. Though it is informative.
No.
Successful projects often lose out on 2nd & 3rd round finding for political reasons. Sad. But True.
____
I looked at the crazy fear site that you cited earlier:
It has not been updated since April 2016. According to your own logic, updates have been discontinued. Therefore, it is no longer in operation and thus is *by your own definition* a failure.
I did skim it briefly. Most of the panic is over “Thorium as a carcinogen”. While true, the hysteria on the site was quite sad. Given that Thorium comes out of the ground as waste from rare earth mining, getting rid of the waste by destroying via fuel use it makes the situation better.
Most of the other points I saw are known and admitted inconveniences. Not disqualifying barriers. The primary impediments are governmental and emotional, not scientific or engineering.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://ife.no/en/project/the-halden-reactor-project/
lol! Berliners and Muscovites take note. The Winged Tarta…Hussars are back on the frontier and crimea…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adil_Giray
Crimean Khan.
“In 1666 he was placed on the throne by the Ottomans, who were displeased with khan Mehmed IV. At the time he was in exile at Rhodes. He came into conflict with his nobles, especially the Shirin clan, because of his Polish ancestry and high taxes. It is said he strongly supported the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, and was one of the candidates in the Polish royal election of 1669”.
Let’s not even get into the list of Polish girls in the Istanbul Harem over the centuries.
I like the experimental approach. That’s why I’ve already gone through this rabbit hole and emerged on the other side. Now it’s cool where I am.
I am learning to hate no one. Karma will take care of everyone equally, me included. We will all be sorted out.
I agree with Greasy here, it’s not even worth trying to level the scores. Quite the opposite. Let it go to its logical conclusions, let it accelerate.
It is about time the circus lights go off…
3 pipes were ruptured by explosives. A 4th pipe was left alone for unknow reasons which we can speculate about…or the bomb on the 4th failed to detonate for some reason. Either technical failure or perhaps counter measures.
3/4 of the carrying capacity was exploded away.
Three pipes ruptured in a manner consistent with a heavy industrial accident.
What could happen if Russia dropped pressure at the fill end to reverse flow & recovery salable material?
• The operators opened valves at their end 1,200 km from Germany.
• Hydrate slug #1 created a rupture.
• Hydrate slug #2 quickly followed, resembling a single event.
• Pipe #3 had a pressure differential end to end 1,200 km. 17 hours lucky it had a slug movement & rupture.
• Pipe #4 luck smiled, no issue
If the operators were clever, they may have been trying to repressurize their end of pipes #3 and #4.
Unfortunately, it is sort of like the CCP's lab at WIV. We will never get an opportunity to thoroughly investigate.
PEACE 😇Replies: @QCIC
Experiments are done to discover problems before commercial scale. A shutdown event/incident is far from a catastrophe. It is industry jargon. It was clearly not an insurmountable issue. It ran for years after the 2016 event you cited. (1) 2018 was the intended research end-date I cited in my previous post, so it lasted the length of its grant.
Also, it was not a LFTR. A solid fuel technology problem is not directly tied to liquid fuel solutions. Though it is informative. No.
Successful projects often lose out on 2nd & 3rd round finding for political reasons. Sad. But True.
____
I looked at the crazy fear site that you cited earlier: It has not been updated since April 2016. According to your own logic, updates have been discontinued. Therefore, it is no longer in operation and thus is *by your own definition* a failure.
I did skim it briefly. Most of the panic is over "Thorium as a carcinogen". While true, the hysteria on the site was quite sad. Given that Thorium comes out of the ground as waste from rare earth mining, getting rid of the waste by destroying via fuel use it makes the situation better.
Most of the other points I saw are known and admitted inconveniences. Not disqualifying barriers. The primary impediments are governmental and emotional, not scientific or engineering.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://ife.no/en/project/the-halden-reactor-project/Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
Halden was closed after a string of failures, of which that of 2016 was the last one AFAIK.
Closing research project does not mean closing reactor; that are two different matters. Therefore closing the Halden reactor in 2018 does not necessarily mean the research project was run successfully. Anyway, secrecy which clouded it after the 2016 class 2 nuclear incident is rather telling.
Commercial Thorium reactors are still more theoretical than real possibility
So you were talking about White women, who betrayed, whereas White men were only guilty of a naive complacency, poor things. (One wonders where you situate all those White male philosophers, artists, and thinkers who advanced the cause of decadence - like Macdonald, they seem invisible to you in the story of Western decline :) )
Do you remember commenter Rosie? She was this female White nationalist who used to post on Audacious Epigones blog, and often Sailers and other blogs. She was intelligent and rather inoffensive, I thought, but for some reason she was viciously persecuted by the boys on that on other parts of this site. I never really understood why they hated her so. She hated Jews, but even I wasn't as mean to her as they were.
But as a general principle, I once tried explaining to her that once you let the genie of "othering" out of the bottle, it does not stop at gender. In fact, gender is one of the primary divisions and examples of "othering" available to the human species - each gender is rather mysterious and confusing to the other, lol.
A society that hates Jews and minorities is going to be misogynistic, simply because all "others" are suspect to the majority power holders. And it's no accident that women's liberation went in tandem with anti-racism.
Can there be a "sweet spot" for "othering", so that you limit it to other races but not to the opposite gender? So far signs are not promising, and I don't know. Can one fine tune these things I winder. Maybe.
But I guess we shall see :) All sorts of interesting anthropological experiments are beginning to take place - no group identity has ever in the past been founded primarily on race, but that is being attempted to.
We shall see.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Feminism. Women Rights. My body my choice.
Not yet human.
TFR ~ 1…
Divorce rate for an American marriage.
Sexual promiscuity.
Children born out of wedlock.
Happy St. Valentine’s Day !
After years of having my computer flooded with Game of Thrones nonsense, yesterday I found out Daneris was John Snow's aunt. Why the hush hush about this feature? Hmmm?Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Leaves No Shadow, @songbird, @Ivashka the fool
😄Replies: @Mr. Hack
So now I’m “stupid” for my opinion (and a few others here who happened to support my comment).
Hey friend, I’m only trying to have a good conversation with you – I expect better from you!
I have always been the one who was the most dismissive of Pynya's "geopolitical genius" and RusFed's "might" on this forum. I remember AP writing that Pynya was doing the right thing for Russian people, while I was always of the opposite opinion. I remember AK being dismissive of me writing that RusFed was corrupt to the bone and weakened. The only thing I got wrong is the degree to which it was rotten and corrupt. It is way worse than I would have thought possible.
I am against this was, always was since 2014. And I always considered and always will that the responsibility for its start lies equally with RusFed, Ukiestan and Western sociopathic elites. That are Globalist, all of them.
And yes, I would prefer keeping as many as possible Eastern Slav genetic lineages alive and well, growing towards a better future, but hey who am I to decide for them if they decided otherwise ?
We are entering a population bottleneck, only a fraction of our lineages will emerge on the other side. I will do what I can to ensure that mine goes on. And good luck to anyone else's.
🙂Replies: @Mr. Hack
3/4 of the carrying capacity was exploded away.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @A123
What a coincidence that the pipeline that Russian wanted open is still able to be open as they wanted, and the one they wanted closed is now forever closed!
Russia, clearly, wanted NS1 & NS2 opened and in operation. What they did not want open is the GTS of Ukraine /404 open.....and guess what - its the one that the lemming-slave-prostitute nazis in Ukraine are refusing to touch. The idea of "feeding the Kremlin's war economy" goes into a mysterious blackhole.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @Wokechoke
https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/bbb0b03df5094073b8ba258d71bd1ec7/3000.jpeg
Not yet human.
https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/rockcms/2022-06/220623-roe-v-wade-abortion-scotus-protest-2-se-805p-2ef18c.jpg
TFR ~ 1...
Divorce rate for an American marriage.
https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2020/07/Share-of-marriages-end-in-divorces-in-US-Stevenson-Wolfers-800x545.png
Sexual promiscuity.
https://cdn-adklk.nitrocdn.com/vAlLOcBPjCSUTuqFpgWoGejnngKOaInw/assets/images/optimized/rev-fc9d120/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Here_s-the-list-of-states-in-the-U.S.-with-the-highest-averages..jpg
Children born out of wedlock.
https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/figure14-w640.png
Happy St. Valentine's Day !Replies: @HeavilyMarbledSteak, @Another Polish Perspective, @Emil Nikola Richard
I think you may want to develop a more sophisticated notion of agency – are any of us really to blame for our delusions?
Western women grew up in a culture where the Gods have been dethroned – a culture that told her that reality is composed of dead matter and that life is best compared to a mechanical machine.
Who created this culture? A rather long line of male European philosophers and thinkers – and yet, are they “guilty”, or did they fall into a delusion? And was it incremental, mistake following mistake, and collective?
Moreover, Western women grew up in a culture that only valued masculine power as expressed through technology and the domination of nature – it had no use for the softer feminine qualities.
How were they to respond to that? One can talk about women’s liberation all one wants, but in a culture where technology and the domination of nature is the dominant mode of engaging with reality, every young girl gets the message about what society really respects and what qualities she should develop on herself.
But who is responsible for all this? Men? Women? Jews? Westerners?
What exactly are we fighting – flesh and blood?
And how, by the way, are men doing – any better?
And what about the growing listlessness and nihilism of East Asia? The nihilistic violence of the Middle East?
I was hoping you would actually give us your definition of masculinity. Does your idea of it not have any fixed qualities? Why so anti-religious? Thought that there were a lot of churches and synagogues accepting gays and trannies now.
Zimbardo (one of your party who fell into disrepute) outright said that he didn't believe in a soul. IIRC, you said you did (probably a dodge to avoid the stigma of not believing in one), but your strange attempt to redefine masculinity seems to show you don't, which is further underlined by your professed belief that you can dissect anyone's brain and see inside their thoughts. Not guess (which everyone enjoys doing), but actually observe their inner self, and then change it. Not just one person that you have rapport with, but anyone here.
I think there is something Satanic in your confidence, and I don't mind saying so. Maybe, it is simple narcissism, but compounded by new age beliefs.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow
Your ability to see me is zero, whereas I have no barriers between my conscious, what would be my unconscious, the unconscious and yours. Of course I believe in a soul. That is the world I am at home in. My confidence comes from direct perception. Where does your fear come from?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shadow
https://youtu.be/wMk-CA_Gi7o
Am no expert on heresy, but sounds like a big one.
https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Engineers_of_the_human_soulReplies: @Leaves No Shadow
Hey friend, I'm only trying to have a good conversation with you - I expect better from you!Replies: @Ivashka the fool
Nowhere have I written that you are stupid Mr Hack. But ignoring everything that in the last 8 years preceded the outright war between RusFed and Ukiestan would indeed been stupid on my part.
I have always been the one who was the most dismissive of Pynya’s “geopolitical genius” and RusFed’s “might” on this forum. I remember AP writing that Pynya was doing the right thing for Russian people, while I was always of the opposite opinion. I remember AK being dismissive of me writing that RusFed was corrupt to the bone and weakened. The only thing I got wrong is the degree to which it was rotten and corrupt. It is way worse than I would have thought possible.
I am against this was, always was since 2014. And I always considered and always will that the responsibility for its start lies equally with RusFed, Ukiestan and Western sociopathic elites. That are Globalist, all of them.
And yes, I would prefer keeping as many as possible Eastern Slav genetic lineages alive and well, growing towards a better future, but hey who am I to decide for them if they decided otherwise ?
We are entering a population bottleneck, only a fraction of our lineages will emerge on the other side. I will do what I can to ensure that mine goes on. And good luck to anyone else’s.
🙂
I may not always agree with you, but I always respect your opinions!
The Shadow could also turn invisible by some trick of hypnotism. But, IIRC, he was originally voiced by Orson Welles, and it had some kind of modulation effect, so it was believable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shadow
https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/bbb0b03df5094073b8ba258d71bd1ec7/3000.jpeg
Not yet human.
https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/rockcms/2022-06/220623-roe-v-wade-abortion-scotus-protest-2-se-805p-2ef18c.jpg
TFR ~ 1...
Divorce rate for an American marriage.
https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2020/07/Share-of-marriages-end-in-divorces-in-US-Stevenson-Wolfers-800x545.png
Sexual promiscuity.
https://cdn-adklk.nitrocdn.com/vAlLOcBPjCSUTuqFpgWoGejnngKOaInw/assets/images/optimized/rev-fc9d120/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Here_s-the-list-of-states-in-the-U.S.-with-the-highest-averages..jpg
Children born out of wedlock.
https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/figure14-w640.png
Happy St. Valentine's Day !Replies: @HeavilyMarbledSteak, @Another Polish Perspective, @Emil Nikola Richard
Women are more promiscuous than men, and their strategy is mating-up: early mating has polygamic structure, resulting in fewer men having more sex, and more men having less sex – the fact is well reflected not only through phenomenon of groupies but in the little noted fact that more young women than young men will have typical heterosexual veneral diseases (if you take into account that a fraction of men are gays, this statistically visible polygamy is even more pronounced) – one man will have sex with many women, who are thus lost for other men. Thus the wisdom of old cultures which always chaperoned young women.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/622809/gonorrhea-rate-in-the-us-by-age-and-sex/
Such early polygamic promiscuity does not suits well monogamic marriages (creating a shadow of an ideal lover a woman once had – together with many other women; on the male side, it could create resentment of the not-ideal-lovers class, also not useful for marriage building), which maybe should be polygamic too in order to accommodate women unbridled preferences. So I am afraid women did not betray white men, they never really coveted them except few alpha cases!
But as we worship Nature now, it is all ok. So maybe worshipping Nature is not so good after all…?!
I also remember that in the book it was a Jewish character who was incel, which I took as parody (of the meme of Jewish sexual revolution) or/and commentary on the death of Judeochristian monogamy ;(Replies: @Coconuts
You seem to be saying that you can enter into people’s souls at will and sift through them and correct their deficiencies.
Am no expert on heresy, but sounds like a big one.
https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Engineers_of_the_human_soul
I have always been the one who was the most dismissive of Pynya's "geopolitical genius" and RusFed's "might" on this forum. I remember AP writing that Pynya was doing the right thing for Russian people, while I was always of the opposite opinion. I remember AK being dismissive of me writing that RusFed was corrupt to the bone and weakened. The only thing I got wrong is the degree to which it was rotten and corrupt. It is way worse than I would have thought possible.
I am against this was, always was since 2014. And I always considered and always will that the responsibility for its start lies equally with RusFed, Ukiestan and Western sociopathic elites. That are Globalist, all of them.
And yes, I would prefer keeping as many as possible Eastern Slav genetic lineages alive and well, growing towards a better future, but hey who am I to decide for them if they decided otherwise ?
We are entering a population bottleneck, only a fraction of our lineages will emerge on the other side. I will do what I can to ensure that mine goes on. And good luck to anyone else's.
🙂Replies: @Mr. Hack
That’s much better, more in line with what I ‘ve come to expect from you.
I may not always agree with you, but I always respect your opinions!
Likely the potential for this is why there is the current level of control over engaging with it culturally.
I was working in an arts related field myself and for a long time (my adult life till then really) my interests were more on religious traditions and consumer society, I was maybe becoming more curious about Northern European themes because of spending time in the Baltic and Belarus.
Seeing mainstream demographic projections in around 2019 got me more interested in major ethnic and cultural change and after the 2020 events it became the main thing I was thinking about. But it’s hard to do anything with that theme at present if you need to earn a living.
If I remember well, Houllebecq book “The Extension Of War Zone” ( Extension du domaine de la lutte) was about this. When I read it, I wasn’t sure how real was the phenomenon, but apparently statistics (indirectly of course, since the average number of sexual partners per person can be misleading, as some have 1 and some have 20 which again is visible in the statistics of veneral diseases) are on Houllebecq’s side
I also remember that in the book it was a Jewish character who was incel, which I took as parody (of the meme of Jewish sexual revolution) or/and commentary on the death of Judeochristian monogamy ;(
For the last time, retard. HALF of the pipeline Russia “wanted” open is open. Obviously volume brings money and Russia in no way benefits from……..can’t be bothered explaining this idiocy
Russia, clearly, wanted NS1 & NS2 opened and in operation. What they did not want open is the GTS of Ukraine /404 open…..and guess what – its the one that the lemming-slave-prostitute nazis in Ukraine are refusing to touch. The idea of “feeding the Kremlin’s war economy” goes into a mysterious blackhole.
Why would an intelligent man such as yourself, write such a collection of self-righteous clichés.
🙄
Pynya the Muscovite khan...
LOL !
How should we call Zelya then?
The Kievan Khazarian Khagan ?
😉Replies: @AP
History repeating as farce, but still repeating. Muscovy/Russia consistently follows a template, which is hard to break, even if Khans have been Germans, or that Georgian. Larping as wigged European aristocrats, Byzantine emperors, saviours and dictators of proles, etc.
That’s what Bykov was writing. But that pattern has not been maintained since Sviatoslav. Rather, Ze’s (ex?) sponsor had stepped into the traditional role of magnate, in a system whose democratic instincts (so different from Russia’s inevitable Asiatic despotism) continue the Rzeczpospolita’s legacy.
These two political ways are incompatible, and thus the deadly friction until there is a permanent break and Russia leave Ukraine alone, and focuses eastward.
Nowadays, the time of classical Empires is over. Now it is time for federations and confederations. Vyacheslav Chornovil, one of the most respected Ukrainian nationalists of the early independent Ukraine, had in his time warned that the Ukrainian state would better be a federation instead of attempting at imposing an unified "one size fits all" approach to all the regions. He had also suggested giving a very large level of autonomy to Crimea.
He was an intelligent person. If Ukrainian political circles would have headed his advice, there would have been no war.Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP
I thought we worshipped “choice”? In other words, absolutely undetermined freedom to choose anything without any horizon determining the direction of our wills? Isn’t that modernity?
Traditionally, it was thought our wills were naturally oriented towards the Good – a rational being was not absolutely free to choose anything, but would only want to choose the Good.
But at some point, this was felt to be an intolerable infringement on our freedom to choose absolutely anything – creatures whose nature’s determined them to choose the Good were, in the modern sense, not “free”, although in the classical sense, freedom was precisely the ability to choose the Good (someone whose faculties were impaired, and who chose the bad, was considered “unfree”, under a constraint preventing him from doing what he would naturally want to do, choose the Good).
But isn’t a will not oriented towards the Good, but just randomly acting, the purest expression of nihilism? Random actions undetermined by a particular horizon are meaningless events, not rational acts, just chance events that have no leaning, like a muscular tic.
Worshipping Nature would be a will oriented towards a particular horizon, a determined will and not “free” in the modern sense, and also not nihilistic (although problematic in other ways if not modified by an understanding of what’s Good in nature).
In fact, we worship the Nothing – and not the good “nothing” of the mystics which is actually the incomprehensible plenitude of Being, but genuine nothing, the nihil of emptiness.
Russia, clearly, wanted NS1 & NS2 opened and in operation. What they did not want open is the GTS of Ukraine /404 open.....and guess what - its the one that the lemming-slave-prostitute nazis in Ukraine are refusing to touch. The idea of "feeding the Kremlin's war economy" goes into a mysterious blackhole.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @Wokechoke
That half would bring more gas than could be sold and Russia most certainly didn’t want NS1 open, as they had previously closed it despite Germany’s objections.
Meanwhile, for you and everyone else here are a couple of nice additional interviews, one with Douglas Macgregor and one with Seymour Hersh:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHi1AvTtyL8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4BuMaGlKp0
Ideologically, they're obviously poles-apart, but they both think that the US government is totally delusional and self-destructive in its Russia/Ukraine policy, with the MSM following along behind.
Hersh wonders whether the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines will cause the collapse of NATO, something I'd suggested from almost the day it occurred. He also seems to think that the Ukrainian forces are currently suffering crushing defeats.
It's hardly surprising that when the West is submerged in a sea of dishonest propaganda, those most visibly standing tall above the lies are often the highest-ranking figures, individuals such as Hersh, Macgregor, John Mearsheimer, Jeffrey Sachs, and Ray McGovern. I discussed all of this in my current piece:
https://www.unz.com/runz/standing-upright-amid-a-sea-of-lies/
So either a good number of America's most eminent academic scholars, journalists, and national security experts have all gone totally insane, or the claims of our political and MSM elites are entirely divorced from reality. Personally, I'm betting on the latter.Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Leaves No Shadow, @A123, @Brás Cubas, @Yevardian
Am no expert on heresy, but sounds like a big one.
https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Engineers_of_the_human_soulReplies: @Leaves No Shadow
You can’t travel anyone’s journey for them. That would be the heresy. It would take away their free will.
Russia, clearly, wanted NS1 & NS2 opened and in operation. What they did not want open is the GTS of Ukraine /404 open.....and guess what - its the one that the lemming-slave-prostitute nazis in Ukraine are refusing to touch. The idea of "feeding the Kremlin's war economy" goes into a mysterious blackhole.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @Wokechoke
Funny that isn’t it? The one umbilical cord to Moscow they don’t sever. Just everyone else’s.
3/4 of the carrying capacity was exploded away.Replies: @Leaves No Shadow, @A123
We have still seen no evidence of explosives. That is based on anonymous sources.
Three pipes ruptured in a manner consistent with a heavy industrial accident.
What could happen if Russia dropped pressure at the fill end to reverse flow & recovery salable material?
• The operators opened valves at their end 1,200 km from Germany.
• Hydrate slug #1 created a rupture.
• Hydrate slug #2 quickly followed, resembling a single event.
• Pipe #3 had a pressure differential end to end 1,200 km. 17 hours lucky it had a slug movement & rupture.
• Pipe #4 luck smiled, no issue
If the operators were clever, they may have been trying to repressurize their end of pipes #3 and #4.
Unfortunately, it is sort of like the CCP’s lab at WIV. We will never get an opportunity to thoroughly investigate.
PEACE 😇
Gerard’s frequent use of the word “cretin” has caused me to become interested in its etymology. Theory seems somewhat tenuous but interesting:
https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/bbb0b03df5094073b8ba258d71bd1ec7/3000.jpeg
Not yet human.
https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/rockcms/2022-06/220623-roe-v-wade-abortion-scotus-protest-2-se-805p-2ef18c.jpg
TFR ~ 1...
Divorce rate for an American marriage.
https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2020/07/Share-of-marriages-end-in-divorces-in-US-Stevenson-Wolfers-800x545.png
Sexual promiscuity.
https://cdn-adklk.nitrocdn.com/vAlLOcBPjCSUTuqFpgWoGejnngKOaInw/assets/images/optimized/rev-fc9d120/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Here_s-the-list-of-states-in-the-U.S.-with-the-highest-averages..jpg
Children born out of wedlock.
https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/figure14-w640.png
Happy St. Valentine's Day !Replies: @HeavilyMarbledSteak, @Another Polish Perspective, @Emil Nikola Richard
What are the statistics for cousin couples?
After years of having my computer flooded with Game of Thrones nonsense, yesterday I found out Daneris was John Snow’s aunt. Why the hush hush about this feature? Hmmm?
Caveat: I do not watch this series, but I heard dragons are important there.
But they say that Charles II of Spain was more inbred than if his parents were normal brother and sister, and supposedly, his sister was a beautiful woman, even though he was ugly. Previously, I've theorized here that incest might have a worse effect on male births.
Wonder what embryo selection would do to the congenital pathologies associated with incest.
How many embryos would you need to select to cancel out or minimize the effects of first cousin marriage (non double)? Am guessing it wouldn't be that many.
Also, just for the heck of it, wonder how far one could get with doing it for siblings. How difficult to reduce the risk to be equivalent to first cousin marriage? And what is the max you could do with iterative selection for siblings?Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123
But one has to be logical and consequential, follow the dots: Baltics are in NATO and quite close to Kaliningrad and Belarus. If Belarus is dragged into the war, then the violence would probably be spilling to Kaliningrad accross the Suwalki Gap.
It means fighting between Belarus & RusFed on one side and Ukraine, Poland and Baltics on the other. I know that East Europeans think that the West would come to the rescue of their Eastern NATO members. But the West has its own problems. The West might well decide to leave the Balto-Slav sort it out. If I was Western I would not want my people to die for the Suwalki Gap. Just like I don't want the Balto-Slav that I consider as my people to die in retarded wars under Western patronage.
I have decried the war between Ukiestan and RusFed from day one. And I have noticed that I might have been the only one on this forum to consistently do so.Replies: @LatW, @Mikel
You must have skipped my comments during the past year. But that’s OK, we all have a life outside of this blog.
Btw, LatW also had a hard time understanding how I can be so opposed to Putin’s war now when I was equally opposed to Ukraine’s actions in Donbas. It’s a strange thing, actually. I used to think that we Euros have a common general view of life and the world. I actually experienced this first hand when I lived in Chile. I met many expats from Europe and the US, including even a couple of Belarussian acquaintances who tried their luck in Chile and stayed at my house for some months. I always found that it was much easier to find rapport with fellow Europeans, even from the opposite side of the continent, than with the locals.
Some years ago I would have thought that one of the things that we have in common these days is regarding war and the killing of innocent people as the most horrendous thing, only to be done as a last resort and to avoid a bigger disaster (as Christian doctrine teaches). But reality has shown me that this was an illusion. LatW is by no means alone in Europe or the US, where most people seem to have started to regard war as a legitimate course of action to solve political/territorial disputes rather than moral dilemmas. In fact, I feel like my non-religious but ethical approach to the question of war probably resonates more with non-Europeans these days than with fellow Euros. From what I read here and there, I have the impression that, unlike most Westerners, non-Euros are just aghast at the war that was once again started in Europe, hoping that it doesn’t affect them too much and in general not feeling much need to take sides.
Re. the acceptability of war in Europe. I think we are undergoing a regression of social norms. My opinion is that it started in the West in 2001 after the Twin Towers attack. It started in the former USSR earlier in late 80ies and early 90ies with all the ethnic strife and the criminal and political violence.
I think we are devolving toward more tribalism everywhere. I don't think that this is entirely negative. Humans need a clan and a tribe to rely upon. Progress has deprived them from that, the regression & archaization would probably bring it back.Replies: @Mikel
After years of having my computer flooded with Game of Thrones nonsense, yesterday I found out Daneris was John Snow's aunt. Why the hush hush about this feature? Hmmm?Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Leaves No Shadow, @songbird, @Ivashka the fool
Well, they aren’t Dragon-bloodlines for nothing…?
Caveat: I do not watch this series, but I heard dragons are important there.
These two political ways are incompatible, and thus the deadly friction until there is a permanent break and Russia leave Ukraine alone, and focuses eastward.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool
The Jew King of Kiev either way you slice it.
How was Britain under Disraeli?
https://twitter.com/blackrepublican/status/844767698009505792?s=20&t=YS2SlZDVRLrXxsVmRh2Fzg
https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1584853051105738754?s=20&t=YS2SlZDVRLrXxsVmRh2Fzg
Disraeli did indeed encourage anti Irish sentiment.
After years of having my computer flooded with Game of Thrones nonsense, yesterday I found out Daneris was John Snow's aunt. Why the hush hush about this feature? Hmmm?Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Leaves No Shadow, @songbird, @Ivashka the fool
It was a twist to do with the circumstances of Snow’s birth, and therefore probably related to the biggest twist in the series. In the books, the fact that the Targaryens marry their siblings is extensively detailed.
Disraeli stirred-up anti-Irish animus, in order to prevaricate and dissimulate about his true identity and allegiance:
After years of having my computer flooded with Game of Thrones nonsense, yesterday I found out Daneris was John Snow's aunt. Why the hush hush about this feature? Hmmm?Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Leaves No Shadow, @songbird, @Ivashka the fool
Her parents and grandparents were brother and sister, so they were even closer. Not sure if that is even biologically possible.
But they say that Charles II of Spain was more inbred than if his parents were normal brother and sister, and supposedly, his sister was a beautiful woman, even though he was ugly. Previously, I’ve theorized here that incest might have a worse effect on male births.
Wonder what embryo selection would do to the congenital pathologies associated with incest.
How many embryos would you need to select to cancel out or minimize the effects of first cousin marriage (non double)? Am guessing it wouldn’t be that many.
Also, just for the heck of it, wonder how far one could get with doing it for siblings. How difficult to reduce the risk to be equivalent to first cousin marriage? And what is the max you could do with iterative selection for siblings?
This should have been handled better in TV season 8. Setting up a new royal family that cannot have an heir is absurd for the universe as established. Assuming George RR Martin lives long enough to finish the novels, we should find out more in a few years.
PEACE 😇Replies: @songbird
Disraeli’s government fell when the Redcoats in Islandwana were nigger rushed by the Zulus.
“A very remarkable people the Zulu. They defeat our generals; they convert our bishops; they have settled the fate of a great European dynasty.” Here he is referring to the death in combat of Prince Louis Napoleon at Islandwana in a battle he instigated. It also ended Disraeli.
Disraeli also had the hots for Zulus after they crushed Lord Chelmsford’s encampment.
Disraeli did indeed encourage anti Irish sentiment.
No. Lukashenko just overplayed his hand by first imprisoning opposition candidates on trumped-up charges and then publishing elections results that nobody over 10 years of age could believe in, although you seemed to believe that the Kherson and Zaporizhia referendums were legitimate, but well, the thing is that lots of people in Belarus weren’t so gullible and reacted strongly in the streets. The West did try to meddle, of course, but you make it sound like some CIA operatives went to Belarus and arranged a revolution out of the blue. Western intervention in the Belarus election crisis was in fact much more subdued than during the Maidan uprising.
However, it is possibly a good thing that the protests didn’t go too far and eventually calmed down with no bloodbath. The average person in Belarus is probably better off under a dictatorial regime than in a state of chaos and armed conflict like their southern neighbors. Besides, it is not very clear that a Jeffersonian democracy is the optimal social arrangement among Eastern Slavs. I’m not sure it has ever worked very well there.
His throne and maybe even his head if a stream of coffins starts coming to their families from Ukraine a few years after he showed the middle finger to the people who voted in the elections.
But they say that Charles II of Spain was more inbred than if his parents were normal brother and sister, and supposedly, his sister was a beautiful woman, even though he was ugly. Previously, I've theorized here that incest might have a worse effect on male births.
Wonder what embryo selection would do to the congenital pathologies associated with incest.
How many embryos would you need to select to cancel out or minimize the effects of first cousin marriage (non double)? Am guessing it wouldn't be that many.
Also, just for the heck of it, wonder how far one could get with doing it for siblings. How difficult to reduce the risk to be equivalent to first cousin marriage? And what is the max you could do with iterative selection for siblings?Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123
The days of telling your daughter who to marry are over with so the question is moot.
I read a good old biologist who said humans are instinctively perpetually asexual towards other humans they were closely familiar with aged 3-7. My own personal data collection provides no argument contra to this. I had a stepsister who was hot enough and I never had any attraction towards her at all even when my hormone flux was 11 on a scale of 10. I have a cousin that might even be acceptable by Yahya’s elite criteria.
Again absolute zippo.
The people who write Game of Thrones &c seem oblivious to this however or I could be completely erroneous.
Greg Cochran once seemed to say that he thought that at least with the Ptolemies it was fake or part fake. (Too much leads to sterility) Cleopatra is described as quite a scholar, and I think beautiful? But historians could have been lying.
Lots of theories about why George R. R. Martin (wrote the books) had so much incest in them. Some say it was because he wanted to promote genetics (such as recessive genes for controlling dragons.) Mostly think it was because he thought it was titillating. One case didn't involve dragons, but evil twins, but mentions hair color.
Jon and Dany could possibly fall under genetic attraction theory. Wikipedia says it is bunk (and could be) but take it with a grain of salt because they do that with everything even remotely related to race.
"You will be made to desire Lizzo."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_sexual_attraction
Super not scientific, but I have only been very mildly attracted to one second cousin. (not that I would necessarily look at her in a room of girls) I'm laughing about the idea of them devising some sort of test to see whether everyone is lying or not. About how old were you when you first met? (<6?) Does it support this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect
Btw, LatW also had a hard time understanding how I can be so opposed to Putin's war now when I was equally opposed to Ukraine's actions in Donbas. It's a strange thing, actually. I used to think that we Euros have a common general view of life and the world. I actually experienced this first hand when I lived in Chile. I met many expats from Europe and the US, including even a couple of Belarussian acquaintances who tried their luck in Chile and stayed at my house for some months. I always found that it was much easier to find rapport with fellow Europeans, even from the opposite side of the continent, than with the locals.
Some years ago I would have thought that one of the things that we have in common these days is regarding war and the killing of innocent people as the most horrendous thing, only to be done as a last resort and to avoid a bigger disaster (as Christian doctrine teaches). But reality has shown me that this was an illusion. LatW is by no means alone in Europe or the US, where most people seem to have started to regard war as a legitimate course of action to solve political/territorial disputes rather than moral dilemmas. In fact, I feel like my non-religious but ethical approach to the question of war probably resonates more with non-Europeans these days than with fellow Euros. From what I read here and there, I have the impression that, unlike most Westerners, non-Euros are just aghast at the war that was once again started in Europe, hoping that it doesn't affect them too much and in general not feeling much need to take sides.Replies: @Sean, @sudden death, @Ivashka the fool
All depends what you are willing to put up with. Re General Milley’s recent remarks that Russia has after one year lost strategically, operationally and tactically in its brutal and illegal invasion, while that is true the invasion was most certainly not as Miley alleges “unprovoked.”
It may have been illegal and brutal, but it was not unprovoked. Russia warned they would not stand for Ukraine getting close to the American led anti Russian military alliance known as Nato, and the top US diplomat in Moscow (now head of the CIA) told the White House that Russia was serious. The invasion came after the US and Ukraine knowingly challenged the Kremlin, which set out to show that Russia was not the sort of country that could be affronted with impunity .
Btw, LatW also had a hard time understanding how I can be so opposed to Putin's war now when I was equally opposed to Ukraine's actions in Donbas. It's a strange thing, actually. I used to think that we Euros have a common general view of life and the world. I actually experienced this first hand when I lived in Chile. I met many expats from Europe and the US, including even a couple of Belarussian acquaintances who tried their luck in Chile and stayed at my house for some months. I always found that it was much easier to find rapport with fellow Europeans, even from the opposite side of the continent, than with the locals.
Some years ago I would have thought that one of the things that we have in common these days is regarding war and the killing of innocent people as the most horrendous thing, only to be done as a last resort and to avoid a bigger disaster (as Christian doctrine teaches). But reality has shown me that this was an illusion. LatW is by no means alone in Europe or the US, where most people seem to have started to regard war as a legitimate course of action to solve political/territorial disputes rather than moral dilemmas. In fact, I feel like my non-religious but ethical approach to the question of war probably resonates more with non-Europeans these days than with fellow Euros. From what I read here and there, I have the impression that, unlike most Westerners, non-Euros are just aghast at the war that was once again started in Europe, hoping that it doesn't affect them too much and in general not feeling much need to take sides.Replies: @Sean, @sudden death, @Ivashka the fool
It all depends on what is your own prefered definition and chosen moment of starting the war, because if not RF’ian intervention, everything would have ended in UA/Crimea/Donbas circa 2014 no any different than it ended in Spain/Catalunya after the most recent independence referendum there.
You may say that Catalans (and Basques) don't have what it takes to become independent, if you want. But how much they're willing to sacrifice for that political objective is their legitimate choice to make. ETA, that still retains plenty of support in some parts of the Basque Country, did kill around 800 people to try to achieve independence, many of them civilians and even some children, if that makes them more likeable to you, since the Spaniards started it all when they invaded the Kingdom of Navarre in the 16th century.Replies: @sudden death
What you eat on the streets of Bangkok is most of the time quite different - much more intense and spicy!
Which is not to say you aren't getting some idea of the incredible flavors of Thai food in America, and even if very different it can be good in it's own right (perhaps it can be a new cuisine :) )
One must travel to Thailand or make it oneself to get the real deal, alas. However, curries are closest to what you find in Thailand, so you can enjoy that in Phoenix :)
Vietnamese can be quite good too and more authentic - there used to be this chain of bread and Ban Mhi shops in Phoenix that I thought was quite decent for a chain - Lees Bakery, maybe? I don't quite remember - I ate at it in Scottsdale once.
NYC has a lot of really good Banh Mi shops :)
Believe it or not, I've never had Borscht before - but recently I was in a part of Brooklyn that had a community from Tashkent, and I picked up a prepared Borscht soup completely on a whim - I have to confess, it was amazing! I was quite surprised. The sour flavors were unexpected but perfect. Thai soups can be excellent too.
Here's to fermentation and the contribution it makes to deliciousness.Replies: @Mr. Hack
I can only imagine. I always get this carousel placed on my table with about 4 different types of hot spices that I can use to increase the voltage, if I think it’s necessary (and I almost always put at least a little into my main dish). If I feel a cold coming on, I put a lot on, so that I can feel the heat in the nasal cavities in my head, and stop the progression right there on the spot. 🙂
But the nice thing about Thai food is that it doesn’t need to be very spicy at all. Flavors like peanuts, Thai basil, lemon grass, can be real tasty and are often used as the main taste profile of many dishes. Another thing about Thai food that most Americans don’t realize is that it’s a very varied sort of cuisine, changing a lot depending on the region within Thailand that you find yourself. I watch Thai food shows on the tube and have learned about this, even while I’m at some of the restaurants where they often play Thai foodie travelogs within the premises. We really are only experiencing the “tip of the iceberg”, here in the states.
Walking through a Thai food market, or a Japanese, you are treated to an astonishing explosion of food variety - little stalls selling everything imaginable. It's quite a delight, what I imagine a market in Medieval Europe to have been like, before everything was "rationalized" and made "efficient" :)
I want to write more about this - my sense is that Asia is "horizontally creative" while the West is - or has been, hopefully it's changing - "vertically creative".
What I mean is, Asia doesn't really change so very much or invent anything really new or dramatic, but explores the incredibly rich possibilities of being human as it is now - so we all love to eat, so Asia will really get down to exploring the full range of what that might mean. Or just being human in general - Asian cities pack a maximum of human "stuff" in the space available - nothing streamlined or efficient - to create maximum entertainment for being human.
The West on the other hand will focus on creating rather streamlined and efficient - and perhaps somewhat boring, comparatively speaking - spaces, but focus on creative "ascent" - the next big thing moving forward, etc, the next new technology or thing that will transform human life, etc.
It's an interesting difference, but perhaps changing - I do think so. (Vertical ascent is a mistake, imo).
And it ties into your point about regional differences in cuisine - India and China, too, have incredible regional variety, and even a relatively small country like Thailand. And that's great!
Maximum exploration of the human condition it is now is what I favor :)
These two political ways are incompatible, and thus the deadly friction until there is a permanent break and Russia leave Ukraine alone, and focuses eastward.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Ivashka the fool
I agree that Muscovite tradition has been authoritarian since Ivan the Terrible at least, probably even since his father’s time. That was the price of survival as the only Orthodox Slav country (with the notable exception of Montenegro) not conquered by some German or Turkic neighbor. It was also the price of building an Empire. Something that the Rzezcpospolita failed at.
Nowadays, the time of classical Empires is over. Now it is time for federations and confederations. Vyacheslav Chornovil, one of the most respected Ukrainian nationalists of the early independent Ukraine, had in his time warned that the Ukrainian state would better be a federation instead of attempting at imposing an unified “one size fits all” approach to all the regions. He had also suggested giving a very large level of autonomy to Crimea.
He was an intelligent person. If Ukrainian political circles would have headed his advice, there would have been no war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentyn_Moroz
Rzeczpospolita was in trouble because it was landlocked and surrounded. The Germans had a similar problem and despite being more numerous than Poles, their 2nd and 3rd Reichs didn’t last nearly as long as did PLC.
Russian despotism was a product of a selection process within the Horde wherein the most loyal and collaborationist of the Rus princes monopolized power (with Tatar patronage) over those who were less loyal. This resulted in a Russian ruling class that was both close to the Tatars in terms of their political folkways and that had less loyalty to their own subjects and native traditions. Indeed. A federation of Poland, Ukraine, the Baltics, and maybe liberation/restoration of Belarus would be a very good thing. Add Czechia and perhaps Slovakia. Crimea and the Russian-populated parts of Donbas should have been expelled from the start. The rest of Ukraine - that had a solid Ukrainian majority in each region - could have been federated.
If this had occurred from the beginning, Ukraine would have been in the EU and NATO and there would have been no war.
A federation with parts populated by ethnic Russian majorities and loyal to Russia would have been a terrible thing for Ukraine (but good for Russia). It would have been a repetition of late-stage PLC where Russia used a few Russia-friendly magnates to paralyze the whole system for its own purposes.Replies: @Gerard1234
I also remember that in the book it was a Jewish character who was incel, which I took as parody (of the meme of Jewish sexual revolution) or/and commentary on the death of Judeochristian monogamy ;(Replies: @Coconuts
I read it when I was about 19, it felt like there was some truth to it just from personal observation. This was more than 20 years ago, afaik before the ‘Red Pill’ movement started and when data to back it up wasn’t easily available.
It has the classic passage:
I didn’t notice the incel guy being Jewish, I remember that he is described as short, swarthy and looking frog like, iirc the narrator draws a comparison between him and a 6’4″ chisel jaw Nordic guy he also works with and comments on the differing sexual market value.
There is a section where the narrator meets one of his old friends who is a Catholic priest in an inner city parish and I recall the priest makes some over enthusiastic comments on the vitality of the era of Louis XIV compared to the present, but the narrator doesn’t take it further.
Btw, LatW also had a hard time understanding how I can be so opposed to Putin's war now when I was equally opposed to Ukraine's actions in Donbas. It's a strange thing, actually. I used to think that we Euros have a common general view of life and the world. I actually experienced this first hand when I lived in Chile. I met many expats from Europe and the US, including even a couple of Belarussian acquaintances who tried their luck in Chile and stayed at my house for some months. I always found that it was much easier to find rapport with fellow Europeans, even from the opposite side of the continent, than with the locals.
Some years ago I would have thought that one of the things that we have in common these days is regarding war and the killing of innocent people as the most horrendous thing, only to be done as a last resort and to avoid a bigger disaster (as Christian doctrine teaches). But reality has shown me that this was an illusion. LatW is by no means alone in Europe or the US, where most people seem to have started to regard war as a legitimate course of action to solve political/territorial disputes rather than moral dilemmas. In fact, I feel like my non-religious but ethical approach to the question of war probably resonates more with non-Europeans these days than with fellow Euros. From what I read here and there, I have the impression that, unlike most Westerners, non-Euros are just aghast at the war that was once again started in Europe, hoping that it doesn't affect them too much and in general not feeling much need to take sides.Replies: @Sean, @sudden death, @Ivashka the fool
You’re right Mikel. You have also been a voice for peace and sanity. I apologize for having omitted mentioning that.
Re. the acceptability of war in Europe. I think we are undergoing a regression of social norms. My opinion is that it started in the West in 2001 after the Twin Towers attack. It started in the former USSR earlier in late 80ies and early 90ies with all the ethnic strife and the criminal and political violence.
I think we are devolving toward more tribalism everywhere. I don’t think that this is entirely negative. Humans need a clan and a tribe to rely upon. Progress has deprived them from that, the regression & archaization would probably bring it back.
People may rationalize the necessity of war in many different ways but it all boils down to our very deep, ancestral instincts. However, we don't live in tribal structures anymore at all. Nation states are a very novel, abstract structure that mimics the tribe that, as you correctly point out, we still feel the need to belong to but are radically different. People being rounded up in Odessa to be forced to kill what they perhaps consider their own kin is the perfect example of this difference.
Besides, we are the only rational species on this planet. Chimpanzees may go to war against a neighboring group and use much more violence than necessary without giving it any thought or feeling any moral compunction but our brains evolved too much and we are not like that.
In fact, our brains have evolved so much that we have now made our planet enter the nuclear era and we can turn one of our old territorial disputes into a global catastrophic event, which history and human nature suggest will happen sooner or later. So, paradoxically, our survival now depends on being able to put under strict control an instinct that until recently was beneficial for our survival.
In other words, I agree with you on the importance of the human tribal dimension but I disagree on the benefits of turning back to it in the present circumstances.Replies: @Coconuts
After years of having my computer flooded with Game of Thrones nonsense, yesterday I found out Daneris was John Snow's aunt. Why the hush hush about this feature? Hmmm?Replies: @Another Polish Perspective, @Leaves No Shadow, @songbird, @Ivashka the fool
I would guess they are more stable. At least they are more so in Yemen and Afghanistan. 🙂
This got me thinking about Rousseau, it’s been said that he took the idea of the Catholic Beatific Vision (or possibly human life after the Second Coming) and applied it to his imagined primeval state of nature before humanity was corrupted by social life and civilisation. Rousseau seems to have believed he had rediscovered this state via his sincerity and introspection, and it made him ‘…the best of men’. Like a sort of reductio and deist version of radical ‘inner light’ Protestantism.
It’s also often linked to the way Hume’s scepticism had undermined belief in Natural Law and the traditional metaphysical arguments for God’s existence and nature. Famously one of the implications was that morality and value judgements could only be based on sentiment and emotion. I think Helvetius was making some similar arguments in the Francophone world at the same time.
You can see how Jean Jacquesism might have taken on in the post-Hume period.
I'd rather be the type of creature that wants the Good, that is compelled to choose the valuable. Am I crazy? Whence comes this desire to be capable of choosing "whatever"? And yet I see it everywhere.
Its been said that mankind models itself after it's conception of God, and at some point in the West, God's "omnipotence" began to take precedence over his Goodness. This was a fatal mistake - whence this obsession with "power"? The power to will anything at all?
Rousseau was on some level hearkening back to a pre-Fall primordial state of perfection, but also prefiguring the modern obsession with the freedom to will "anything" - he was a confused man, although he had some good in him.
In Taoism, "freedom" is aligning oneself with the Tao - it's not the freedom to will anything at all, but the freedom to will what is natural for us to will, to be the sorts of creatures who align ourselves with Good. The freedom to realize our determined nature.
In a sense, the greatest freedom is the greatest un-freedom :) When we humans are what we are by necessity, when we follow our natures, we are freest.
Humean logic is limited logic - one step further, and it undermines itself. Sure, logic alone and purely can't provide a basis for morality and value judgements - but logic also can't provide a basis for itself :) All these years, and we humans can't provide a "ground" for logic.
Why is modernity so afraid to take that next step?
Either there is some correspondence between human thought and "reality" or there isn't - if there isn't, then the very logic that tells us there isn't can't be trusted, and is self-undermining. But if there is, then....
Then?Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
Targaryen family (lot of incest in tree) was probably based on different god-king dynasties, like the Pharaohs or Inca, where they were supposed to always marry close relatives.
Greg Cochran once seemed to say that he thought that at least with the Ptolemies it was fake or part fake. (Too much leads to sterility) Cleopatra is described as quite a scholar, and I think beautiful? But historians could have been lying.
Lots of theories about why George R. R. Martin (wrote the books) had so much incest in them. Some say it was because he wanted to promote genetics (such as recessive genes for controlling dragons.) Mostly think it was because he thought it was titillating. One case didn’t involve dragons, but evil twins, but mentions hair color.
Jon and Dany could possibly fall under genetic attraction theory. Wikipedia says it is bunk (and could be) but take it with a grain of salt because they do that with everything even remotely related to race.
“You will be made to desire Lizzo.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_sexual_attraction
Super not scientific, but I have only been very mildly attracted to one second cousin. (not that I would necessarily look at her in a room of girls) I’m laughing about the idea of them devising some sort of test to see whether everyone is lying or not.
About how old were you when you first met? (<6?) Does it support this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect
Who really wants the freedom to choose “whatever”? I’d rather choose the Good 🙂
I’d rather be the type of creature that wants the Good, that is compelled to choose the valuable. Am I crazy? Whence comes this desire to be capable of choosing “whatever”? And yet I see it everywhere.
Its been said that mankind models itself after it’s conception of God, and at some point in the West, God’s “omnipotence” began to take precedence over his Goodness. This was a fatal mistake – whence this obsession with “power”? The power to will anything at all?
Rousseau was on some level hearkening back to a pre-Fall primordial state of perfection, but also prefiguring the modern obsession with the freedom to will “anything” – he was a confused man, although he had some good in him.
In Taoism, “freedom” is aligning oneself with the Tao – it’s not the freedom to will anything at all, but the freedom to will what is natural for us to will, to be the sorts of creatures who align ourselves with Good. The freedom to realize our determined nature.
In a sense, the greatest freedom is the greatest un-freedom 🙂 When we humans are what we are by necessity, when we follow our natures, we are freest.
Humean logic is limited logic – one step further, and it undermines itself. Sure, logic alone and purely can’t provide a basis for morality and value judgements – but logic also can’t provide a basis for itself 🙂 All these years, and we humans can’t provide a “ground” for logic.
Why is modernity so afraid to take that next step?
Either there is some correspondence between human thought and “reality” or there isn’t – if there isn’t, then the very logic that tells us there isn’t can’t be trusted, and is self-undermining. But if there is, then….
Then?
No, and you’re proving my point. Regardless of who started the conflict, you always have the choice of not shooting at civilians. Ukrainian authorities decided that their country’s territorial integrity was more valuable than the lives of innocent civilians living in those territories and possibly most people in Ukraine found that decision correct, or eventually came to find it inevitable, including many practicing Christians. The public in the West was carefully kept ignorant of this fact but right now I wouldn’t be too surprised if many Westerners also approved of Ukraine’s decision to shell civilians areas because “Russia started first”.
You’re wrong. People on both sides in Ukraine were willing to kill and die, as proven by the Maidan events and later on in Donbas, Kharkiv, Odessa, etc. Nobody was really willing to die in Spain/Catalonia and nobody actually died. In fact, the Catalonian autonomous government had already declared the Catalan Republic in the 30s, at a time of much more political turbulence, but the rebellion also fizzled out in a couple of days when the Spanish authorities, backed by armed forces that in those days were definitely willing to kill, appeared on the scene.
You may say that Catalans (and Basques) don’t have what it takes to become independent, if you want. But how much they’re willing to sacrifice for that political objective is their legitimate choice to make. ETA, that still retains plenty of support in some parts of the Basque Country, did kill around 800 people to try to achieve independence, many of them civilians and even some children, if that makes them more likeable to you, since the Spaniards started it all when they invaded the Kingdom of Navarre in the 16th century.
Worshipping nature is hard to equate with TFR ~ 1. The fecund natural human couple would naturally behave according to the selfish gene theory. It is the individualistic and hedonistic deviation of the selfish gene instinct that leads to sexual promiscuity and conjugal instability. The dopamine that is naturally coupled with copulation is aimed at ensuring posterity. When sex is completely detached from any prospects of childbirth, it is not a natural pleasure, but more of an artificial and civilized one. Anyway, we’re all Calhoun’s mice nowadays. None among us is still truly natural. We have been thoroughly domesticated.
Also mating with alphas is not so universal among animals, many birds will have just one partner for life.In general, I think the explanatory power of selfish gene theory is over-advertised.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
In most of history, the population was stable i.e. fertility rates historically were not above replacement, while today it is increasing (i.e. fertility rates are above replacement, which is something unusual of recent human history).
The large population of humans is because of recent humans being able to create artificial nature, i.e. is a result of engineering the environment and unnatural by the definition.*
For most of history, the human population was not increasing. To create the first population of 1 billion humans, required 200,000 years (196,200 BC- 1800 AD, while another 1 billion humans has been added to the population in the last 11 years.
So, the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD) has added more humans to world population, than the first 200,000 years of human history (196,200 BC- 1800 AD).
Natural population of humans was around 20,000 people for most our history. While today there are 60 times more Latvians, than the world population of humans our ancestors were living in.
This is one of the main examples where we are not psychologically adapted. For example, we lived in societies with around 80 people.
Our mind is designed for these societies of 80 people, not societies with 146,000,000 people (or Chinese now in a society of 1,400,000,000 people, while their minds were designed for 80 people).
If you live in a society with 80 people, it would be normal to see familiar people as your friends. But in the 21st century, familiar people are celebrities, politicians.
They are people who rationally have no connection to us, but emotionally we view like they are friends. Sometimes they can be even the most dangerous people (i.e. our politicians), but our mind perceives them like a friendly relative.
-
*Constant increase in population of humans is because of creating artificial nature. Normal animals in our level in the food chain are like polar bears, lions, great apes or bears.
Animals which are high in the food chain like humans are designed for small populations like 1000-10,000, not 8,000,000,000. Only other large animals with those numbers are artificial animals which humans farm for food like cows and sheeps.
We think about our nonhuman ancestors which we still primarily continue. We are primarily constitution of nonhuman history as human history is only recent part of story.There is our ancestor "Purgatorius", who is the first primate. A very high proportion of our current genes would be used by, or using (in "self gene theory"), "Purgatorius". https://i.imgur.com/dO8vumu.jpg
Our early vertebrate ancestor was something which lived in coastal waters as this, which also already would have mostly the same genes we have. https://i.imgur.com/1JD4PeC.jpg But are we as "eukaryotes" created by conjunction of single-cell animals entering each other. https://i.imgur.com/BjSNeoZ.jpg
Is categorization as a single animal just a language concept or is it related to the consciousness?Replies: @Ivashka the fool
I'd rather be the type of creature that wants the Good, that is compelled to choose the valuable. Am I crazy? Whence comes this desire to be capable of choosing "whatever"? And yet I see it everywhere.
Its been said that mankind models itself after it's conception of God, and at some point in the West, God's "omnipotence" began to take precedence over his Goodness. This was a fatal mistake - whence this obsession with "power"? The power to will anything at all?
Rousseau was on some level hearkening back to a pre-Fall primordial state of perfection, but also prefiguring the modern obsession with the freedom to will "anything" - he was a confused man, although he had some good in him.
In Taoism, "freedom" is aligning oneself with the Tao - it's not the freedom to will anything at all, but the freedom to will what is natural for us to will, to be the sorts of creatures who align ourselves with Good. The freedom to realize our determined nature.
In a sense, the greatest freedom is the greatest un-freedom :) When we humans are what we are by necessity, when we follow our natures, we are freest.
Humean logic is limited logic - one step further, and it undermines itself. Sure, logic alone and purely can't provide a basis for morality and value judgements - but logic also can't provide a basis for itself :) All these years, and we humans can't provide a "ground" for logic.
Why is modernity so afraid to take that next step?
Either there is some correspondence between human thought and "reality" or there isn't - if there isn't, then the very logic that tells us there isn't can't be trusted, and is self-undermining. But if there is, then....
Then?Replies: @Another Polish Perspective
Logical truths exist in their own kingdom (“Third Kingdom”), independently of anything human, so also of ethics: so said the great Gottlob Frege.
This somehow sounds very Marxist, Marx allegedly saying that “freedom is conscious necessity” (thus Marxism is the only rational choice), so at least the running saying during the communist times.
But Marxian "necessity" is not at all what I mean - the question is, discover your necessity. Marx was just trying to make his laws, "inevitable". A sleight of hand.
But what is, truly, inevitable? What is your nature? What do you truly want?
Not sure whether this can be explain with selfish gene theory – by mating only with alpha male, in the long run women decrease fitness of their own community (everyone becomes cousin of everyone).
Also mating with alphas is not so universal among animals, many birds will have just one partner for life.
In general, I think the explanatory power of selfish gene theory is over-advertised.
Well, Marx didn’t exist in a vacuum – he borrowed from pre-existing philosophies.
But Marxian “necessity” is not at all what I mean – the question is, discover your necessity. Marx was just trying to make his laws, “inevitable”. A sleight of hand.
But what is, truly, inevitable? What is your nature? What do you truly want?
I was going to write a lenghty and unhinged rant, same as usual, and then I learned that someone (Rolo Slavskyi) has published some Shafarevich's translation on Unz Review.
https://www.unz.com/article/postscript-to-the-three-thousand-year-old-enigma/
https://www.unz.com/article/the-elusive-jewish-solution/Replies: @S, @Coconuts
https://www.unz.com/article/the-elusive-jewish-solution/
There is an interesting quote in the above post:
About the views of Lev Gumilev.
It reminded me a bit of Maurras’ idea of human societies as something like organisms:
I think Aristotle might have been the first to set out an organic view of human societies?
Maurras thought the problems with hidden ethnic oligarchies could be solved by the establishment of a decentralised, corporatist monarchy, because the king would have enough independent power to control them, and the familial, organic structure of political society would make their existence and activities more obvious. He was writing pre-globalisation though, in the early 20th century.
It's just that we are animals capable of culture and metaphysics. Therefore, natural human clans and tribes are also biological phenomena organized for the survival of a given genomic pool (a human population). Selfish gene again.
Today we see the child-free, homosexual and trans propaganda directed at the younger population. It is done by those who want their clans to outbreed the clans of these kids. Kids must know that future belongs to those who show up to face it. No offspring offering a promess of posterity - no future.
Maurras was right in a situation where the Monarch is part and parcel of the population he lords upon. But when a Monarch belongs to a foreign clan, it doen't necessarily lead to a better chance of survival for his subjects. If the elite is alien, then there is a higher chance for it to be a predatory one.Replies: @Dmitry
But they say that Charles II of Spain was more inbred than if his parents were normal brother and sister, and supposedly, his sister was a beautiful woman, even though he was ugly. Previously, I've theorized here that incest might have a worse effect on male births.
Wonder what embryo selection would do to the congenital pathologies associated with incest.
How many embryos would you need to select to cancel out or minimize the effects of first cousin marriage (non double)? Am guessing it wouldn't be that many.
Also, just for the heck of it, wonder how far one could get with doing it for siblings. How difficult to reduce the risk to be equivalent to first cousin marriage? And what is the max you could do with iterative selection for siblings?Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123
Bringing back Drogo rendered Daenerys sterile, “only death can pay for life”. She admits this in a TV episode. In terms of reproductive genetics, the overlapping lineage with Jon Snow (a.k.a. Jon Targaryen) is not relevant.
This should have been handled better in TV season 8. Setting up a new royal family that cannot have an heir is absurd for the universe as established. Assuming George RR Martin lives long enough to finish the novels, we should find out more in a few years.
PEACE 😇
Mice can be inbred in the lab for a number of generations. But I think they are different because they are very r-selected, and may have had more purifying selection in nature. (Just my wild theory)
As far as a heir goes, I would say they could either fake it. i.e. have Jon knock up some woman and pretend it was Dany's, or else legitimize a bastard. But probably Martin would not go for either of those things, but will just make Jon kill her.
Don't know if Martin has 1.25 more books in him, at this point. Think he said he doesn't want anyone else to finish it if he dies, but pretty sure they will just rob the bones from his grave and force a pen in the skeleton's hand. Brandon Sanderson could probably pump it out in two years.
BTW, I was recently just exposed to this old Trump tweet, and I thought it was pretty good:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/423780333687808001?s=20&t=bYyJH1I-FT4WXtKM62-IhA
Also mating with alphas is not so universal among animals, many birds will have just one partner for life.In general, I think the explanatory power of selfish gene theory is over-advertised.Replies: @Ivashka the fool
In the natural environment, it never got to this point. Men and women being what they are, we always had some cheating going on, and therefore some genetic diversification. Although it is true that some Y haplotypes performed better. However, this is due to the alpha providing more to the offspring and ensuing a better protection. Women seeking alphas is good and natural and fits well with selfish gene. But we probably have less of family oriented alphas nowadays. Today being an alpha is being a hedonistic playboy who is mainly interested in sex. Girls like it until they grow older and realize that there is a risk they end up lonely when getting older and less sexually attractive. Then they settle for a beta. Some women also basically settle for anyone if their baby-craving / pregnancy-craving gets strong enough.
Marxism has taught us about the basis (economy) and the superstructure (culture, societal norms, religion etc.) But even before economy, we have biology. Humans pretend they are not animals, but they are.
It’s just that we are animals capable of culture and metaphysics. Therefore, natural human clans and tribes are also biological phenomena organized for the survival of a given genomic pool (a human population). Selfish gene again.
Today we see the child-free, homosexual and trans propaganda directed at the younger population. It is done by those who want their clans to outbreed the clans of these kids. Kids must know that future belongs to those who show up to face it. No offspring offering a promess of posterity – no future.
Maurras was right in a situation where the Monarch is part and parcel of the population he lords upon. But when a Monarch belongs to a foreign clan, it doen’t necessarily lead to a better chance of survival for his subjects. If the elite is alien, then there is a higher chance for it to be a predatory one.
It was 200,000 years of human population to increase to the first 1 billion, while since 2011 the population has increased by 1 billion. This is the first 200,000 years of our history (198,200 BC - 1800 AD) added the same number of people to the population, as the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD). So, the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD) has added more humans to world population, than the first 200,000 years of human history (196,200 BC- 1800 AD).Natural population of humans was around 20,000 people for most our history. While today there are 60 times more Latvians, than the world population of humans our ancestors were living in.This is one of the main examples where we are not psychologically adapted. For example, we lived in societies with around 80 people.Our mind is designed for these societies of 80 people, not societies with 146,000,000 people (population of the Russian Federation), or 330,000,000 (population of the United States of America), or 1,400,000,000 people (population of China). There is a bit of different between what we are designed for, 80 people, or where Chinese live today 1,400,000,000.If you live in a society with 80 people, it would be normal to see familiar people as your friends. But in the 21st century, familiar people are celebrities, politicians.They are people who rationally have no connection to us, but emotionally we view like they are friends. Sometimes they can be even the most dangerous people (i.e. our politicians), but our mind perceives them like a friendly grandfather.–*Constant increase in population of humans is because of creating artificial nature. Normal animals in our level in the food chain are like polar bears, lions, great apes or bears.Animals which are high in the food chain like humans are designed for small populations like 1000-30,000, not 8,000,000,000. Except humans, the only large animals with those numbers are semi-artificial animals, which humans farm for food like cows and sheeps.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @AP
You may say that Catalans (and Basques) don't have what it takes to become independent, if you want. But how much they're willing to sacrifice for that political objective is their legitimate choice to make. ETA, that still retains plenty of support in some parts of the Basque Country, did kill around 800 people to try to achieve independence, many of them civilians and even some children, if that makes them more likeable to you, since the Spaniards started it all when they invaded the Kingdom of Navarre in the 16th century.Replies: @sudden death
Despite that willingness to die/kill from some most passionate groups/individuals, the only place from above mentioned, where it ended differently than Spain eventually, was the place with armed intervention from RF’ians.
Kiev, Kharkov and Odessa especially, got ugly riots and even one classical early 20th century style pogrom in one building with tens of victims, but still did not result in anything too drastic on grand scale, because the organized, sponsored and armed intervention was absent.
But it's you who is making a comparison that objectively doesn't stand. In all the places I've mentioned I remember at least two things: people killed by their political opponents (they even shot the major of Kharkiv, who had to be evacuated to a hospital in Israel) and HRW documenting tortures, disappearances and arbitrary detentions. In Catalonia one person lost her eye and it wasn't intentional. There were some rather brutal scenes too, captured by the international press at the polling stations. That was all. Different situations and a very different history and social evolution during the 20th century that led to opposite consequences.
The Spanish public opinion, from what I can gather, is massively in favor of the Ukrainians in this war anyway, so things may sadly be transitioning towards a higher acceptance of violence, like in the 30s.Replies: @sudden death
A Bedouin soldier was killed in Israel.
You could have changed the uniform for a Ukrainian soldier and nobody would know.
But the cousin looks Saudi, converted to Judaism to become a Haredi rabbi.
https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/2165715/family-of-heroes-the-lubavitch-cousin-of-the-bedouin-policeman-killed-in-terror-attack.html
Three pipes ruptured in a manner consistent with a heavy industrial accident.
What could happen if Russia dropped pressure at the fill end to reverse flow & recovery salable material?
• The operators opened valves at their end 1,200 km from Germany.
• Hydrate slug #1 created a rupture.
• Hydrate slug #2 quickly followed, resembling a single event.
• Pipe #3 had a pressure differential end to end 1,200 km. 17 hours lucky it had a slug movement & rupture.
• Pipe #4 luck smiled, no issue
If the operators were clever, they may have been trying to repressurize their end of pipes #3 and #4.
Unfortunately, it is sort of like the CCP's lab at WIV. We will never get an opportunity to thoroughly investigate.
PEACE 😇Replies: @QCIC
Will you drop this theory when someone admits they bombed it?
-- resources
-- motive
-- capabilities & competence Then answer key questions:-- Why this geography? (1)
https://thelawdogfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/nord-292x300.jpg
-- Why a 17 hour delay on pipe #3?
-- Why leave pipe #4 undamaged? UR being a conspiracy site creates issues. It attracts commenters prone to leap to complex solution when more straightforward ones are available. • Did the event have overlap with politicians talking about a problem? Certainly. • Does that make those politicians the most likely explanation? No. That is a leap. • How competent are politicians? They are skilled enough to commission such a plan. The plan delivers a foul up. And, they talk so much they bring suspicion themselves. Ask these questions about the WUHAN-19 virus or NordStream. It is easy to see conspiracy explanations popping out that the woodwork that ultimately make little sense. PEACE 😇
__________(1) https://thelawdogfiles.com/2022/10/nordstream-ii-electric-instapundit.htmlReplies: @QCIC
I remember my mom reading it around mid 90ies. She tried to make me go through it, but I phased out after a couple of pages. At the time she was also reading the books of Vissaryion the Minusinsk pseudo-Jesus that the RusFed authorities have recently arrested under fake accusations to seize his community’s land because it is supposedly sitting atop of some ore deposits. RusFed was full of various sects and cults back then.
Apparently the guy who started the sect was really stinkin' rich and he gave all his money away?
Maybe it was like the Wittgenstein deal where he just signed it all over to his sister who worshiped him their whole lives.
She didn’t tell you the part about the psilocybin mushrooms I’m guessing.
Apparently the guy who started the sect was really stinkin’ rich and he gave all his money away?
Maybe it was like the Wittgenstein deal where he just signed it all over to his sister who worshiped him their whole lives.
Could be wrong, but I don't really see how Balts would want to be culturally and politically swamped by some much bigger country.
Or are you imagining it, without them?Replies: @LatW
Getting more attention than before but, unfortunately, not yet fully mainstream. There are some newly established political formats, which is not bad.
You’re correct that most Balts are focused more on the nation state type of ideas as well as partly on the EU, but the world has changed a lot, and is still changing rather fast.
I’m not exactly sure I understand what you mean by “culturally and politically swamped”. Everyone has their own country and culture, many of the political views are aligned, and it would be more about coordination, rather than creating a full on confederation. Substance and content is more important than formalities.
But beyond that, we have seen the path of the EU, and I am convinced that it is the organic path of any such organization. Meaning, I think you would need to design a system which would prevent the elites from eroding national boundaries, and it is probably harder than just putting a law or regulation down on paper. It would need to be incentivized and run through simulations, and be over-engineered by a factor of four. That is, if you want to keep some national identity.
But even for those who aren't attached to it, and don't mind their neighbors. There is the tendency to keep growing and accepting new neighbors, and new peoples. You still would need a new national identity to prevent that, and it is not guaranteed they would give it to you.Replies: @LatW, @A123, @AP
World fertility rate now is higher above replacement than most of human history.
In most of history, the population was stable i.e. fertility rates historically were not above replacement, while today it is increasing (i.e. fertility rates are above replacement, which is something unusual of recent human history).
The large population of humans is because of recent humans being able to create artificial nature, i.e. is a result of engineering the environment and unnatural by the definition.*
For most of history, the human population was not increasing. To create the first population of 1 billion humans, required 200,000 years (196,200 BC- 1800 AD, while another 1 billion humans has been added to the population in the last 11 years.
So, the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD) has added more humans to world population, than the first 200,000 years of human history (196,200 BC- 1800 AD).
Natural population of humans was around 20,000 people for most our history. While today there are 60 times more Latvians, than the world population of humans our ancestors were living in.
This is one of the main examples where we are not psychologically adapted. For example, we lived in societies with around 80 people.
Our mind is designed for these societies of 80 people, not societies with 146,000,000 people (or Chinese now in a society of 1,400,000,000 people, while their minds were designed for 80 people).
If you live in a society with 80 people, it would be normal to see familiar people as your friends. But in the 21st century, familiar people are celebrities, politicians.
They are people who rationally have no connection to us, but emotionally we view like they are friends. Sometimes they can be even the most dangerous people (i.e. our politicians), but our mind perceives them like a friendly relative.
–
*Constant increase in population of humans is because of creating artificial nature. Normal animals in our level in the food chain are like polar bears, lions, great apes or bears.
Animals which are high in the food chain like humans are designed for small populations like 1000-10,000, not 8,000,000,000. Only other large animals with those numbers are artificial animals which humans farm for food like cows and sheeps.
I do not want this to sound like any kind of moral comparison between Southwestern Europeans versus Eastern Slavs. I don’t have any particular sympathy for the imperialist Spaniards or the woke Catalans separatists. I don’t even sympathize much with my old countrymen. When I go there I feel like a foreigner surrounded by people stuck in a different era. Even when I lived there I felt that the ones who didn’t support violence were too cowardly to oppose it openly and confront the radical bullies who imposed a reign of silence in every town.
But it’s you who is making a comparison that objectively doesn’t stand. In all the places I’ve mentioned I remember at least two things: people killed by their political opponents (they even shot the major of Kharkiv, who had to be evacuated to a hospital in Israel) and HRW documenting tortures, disappearances and arbitrary detentions. In Catalonia one person lost her eye and it wasn’t intentional. There were some rather brutal scenes too, captured by the international press at the polling stations. That was all. Different situations and a very different history and social evolution during the 20th century that led to opposite consequences.
The Spanish public opinion, from what I can gather, is massively in favor of the Ukrainians in this war anyway, so things may sadly be transitioning towards a higher acceptance of violence, like in the 30s.
This should have been handled better in TV season 8. Setting up a new royal family that cannot have an heir is absurd for the universe as established. Assuming George RR Martin lives long enough to finish the novels, we should find out more in a few years.
PEACE 😇Replies: @songbird
Technically, a Jon and Dany combination would still be less inbred than either Dany or Jon’s father. (supposing such a thing is possible) I was speaking about the two generations of brother-sister marriages, of Dany’s parents and grandparents.
Mice can be inbred in the lab for a number of generations. But I think they are different because they are very r-selected, and may have had more purifying selection in nature. (Just my wild theory)
As far as a heir goes, I would say they could either fake it. i.e. have Jon knock up some woman and pretend it was Dany’s, or else legitimize a bastard. But probably Martin would not go for either of those things, but will just make Jon kill her.
Don’t know if Martin has 1.25 more books in him, at this point. Think he said he doesn’t want anyone else to finish it if he dies, but pretty sure they will just rob the bones from his grave and force a pen in the skeleton’s hand. Brandon Sanderson could probably pump it out in two years.
BTW, I was recently just exposed to this old Trump tweet, and I thought it was pretty good:
It's just that we are animals capable of culture and metaphysics. Therefore, natural human clans and tribes are also biological phenomena organized for the survival of a given genomic pool (a human population). Selfish gene again.
Today we see the child-free, homosexual and trans propaganda directed at the younger population. It is done by those who want their clans to outbreed the clans of these kids. Kids must know that future belongs to those who show up to face it. No offspring offering a promess of posterity - no future.
Maurras was right in a situation where the Monarch is part and parcel of the population he lords upon. But when a Monarch belongs to a foreign clan, it doen't necessarily lead to a better chance of survival for his subjects. If the elite is alien, then there is a higher chance for it to be a predatory one.Replies: @Dmitry
Current fertility rates are higher above replacement than in most of human history, as the population is increasing today, while in most of history the population was stable.
For the human population to increase, is a result of humans changing their environment artificially, engineering an artificial nature. It is because of recent humans being able to create artificial nature, i.e. is a result of engineering the environment to create this artificial world we live in (just look at the objects in your room) that population increases.*
It was 200,000 years of human population to increase to the first 1 billion, while since 2011 the population has increased by 1 billion.
This is the first 200,000 years of our history (198,200 BC – 1800 AD) added the same number of people to the population, as the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD).
So, the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD) has added more humans to world population, than the first 200,000 years of human history (196,200 BC- 1800 AD).
Natural population of humans was around 20,000 people for most our history. While today there are 60 times more Latvians, than the world population of humans our ancestors were living in.
This is one of the main examples where we are not psychologically adapted. For example, we lived in societies with around 80 people.
Our mind is designed for these societies of 80 people, not societies with 146,000,000 people (population of the Russian Federation), or 330,000,000 (population of the United States of America), or 1,400,000,000 people (population of China).
There is a bit of different between what we are designed for, 80 people, or where Chinese live today 1,400,000,000.
If you live in a society with 80 people, it would be normal to see familiar people as your friends. But in the 21st century, familiar people are celebrities, politicians.
They are people who rationally have no connection to us, but emotionally we view like they are friends. Sometimes they can be even the most dangerous people (i.e. our politicians), but our mind perceives them like a friendly grandfather.
–
*Constant increase in population of humans is because of creating artificial nature. Normal animals in our level in the food chain are like polar bears, lions, great apes or bears.
Animals which are high in the food chain like humans are designed for small populations like 1000-30,000, not 8,000,000,000. Except humans, the only large animals with those numbers are semi-artificial animals, which humans farm for food like cows and sheeps.
No, she didn’t tell me about it. But I remember that the guy who was the author of this “esoteric novel” and who started the “Anastasian Movement” was supposedly a businessman who decided to downshift in Siberia or the Russian Far East (what a ridiculous idea when one can downshift in Thailand). But I suspect that he made even more money selling these books than he supposed lost due to mafia taking over his business or someone.
BTW thanks for making me nostalgic, these were crazy times, but there were some really funny moments. Like a young female Jews for Jesus missionary trying to have a discussion with me in Moscow, Gipsy guys inviting me to an “Orthodox Gipsy Church” (I declined their invitation) or me sharing a night train between Moscow and Piter, drinking with a Chechen mafia dude until we both passed out.
Ah yeah, also me receiving my first book of translation of the Gnostic Nag Hammadi texts as a gift from a Muscovite intelligentsia couple who wanted me to date their daughter (she was probably smart, but she wasn’t sexy) they added a Krishnamurti picture to the book for some unknown reason.
Anyways, those were the times.
It was 200,000 years of human population to increase to the first 1 billion, while since 2011 the population has increased by 1 billion. This is the first 200,000 years of our history (198,200 BC - 1800 AD) added the same number of people to the population, as the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD). So, the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD) has added more humans to world population, than the first 200,000 years of human history (196,200 BC- 1800 AD).Natural population of humans was around 20,000 people for most our history. While today there are 60 times more Latvians, than the world population of humans our ancestors were living in.This is one of the main examples where we are not psychologically adapted. For example, we lived in societies with around 80 people.Our mind is designed for these societies of 80 people, not societies with 146,000,000 people (population of the Russian Federation), or 330,000,000 (population of the United States of America), or 1,400,000,000 people (population of China). There is a bit of different between what we are designed for, 80 people, or where Chinese live today 1,400,000,000.If you live in a society with 80 people, it would be normal to see familiar people as your friends. But in the 21st century, familiar people are celebrities, politicians.They are people who rationally have no connection to us, but emotionally we view like they are friends. Sometimes they can be even the most dangerous people (i.e. our politicians), but our mind perceives them like a friendly grandfather.–*Constant increase in population of humans is because of creating artificial nature. Normal animals in our level in the food chain are like polar bears, lions, great apes or bears.Animals which are high in the food chain like humans are designed for small populations like 1000-30,000, not 8,000,000,000. Except humans, the only large animals with those numbers are semi-artificial animals, which humans farm for food like cows and sheeps.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @AP
Did you watch Ancient Apocalypse ?
Also René Barjavel would have disagreed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ice_People_(Barjavel_novel)
Just kidding because you’re too serious.
I agree with what you wrote. We are living in a completely unnatural way. Desmond Morris in the Naked Ape and the Naked Couple had adequately described the problem. I’ve read both books when I was in my early twenties, but I didn’t really consider it that important. Now I think otherwise. But I have since also read the Unabomber Manifesto and discussed metaphysics with Chat GPT. Perhaps I should re-read Desmond Morris…
🙂
https://youtu.be/Ss8vJNx-iw8?t=73.Replies: @Yahya
Should have been a reply to Emil
I was going to ask not about “Ancient Apocalypse” but something maybe more metaphysical https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-205/#comment-5766648
The concept of “selfish gene”, is that genes from evolution view are not interested in the animal, but only in the genes’ replication through animals. This is the idea that the animal is not using genes, but genes are using the animal.
It’s opposition to the idea that intention of evolution would be seen in terms survival of the animal or survival of the animal’s species.
This is more problem of language to explain. For example, are we a single animal? From some viewpoint, we can each be viewed as a colony of animals with mitochondria. microbiome. And what is the relation of consciousness to animals?
Finally, because genes can be using the animals, does this mean the animal can be reduced to the genetic information. Of course, the animal are including physical parts which cannot be reduced to the particular instructions or the physical media for storing instructions (chain of amino acids).
–
We think about our nonhuman ancestors which we still primarily continue. We are primarily constitution of nonhuman history as human history is only recent part of story.
There is our ancestor “Purgatorius”, who is the first primate. A very high proportion of our current genes would be used by, or using (in “self gene theory”), “Purgatorius”.
Our early vertebrate ancestor was something which lived in coastal waters as this, which also already would have mostly the same genes we have.

But are we as “eukaryotes” created by conjunction of single-cell animals entering each other.

Is categorization as a single animal just a language concept or is it related to the consciousness?
From a very tangible and material pov, we are not individuals, but colonies of specialized cells working together as an organism. Our consciousness allows us to see ourselves as an entity, but this view is misleading and is due to the way our brain processes information. I think we should see our personality as an attractor for the many non linear streams of information that our being is woven from.
Regarding the selfish gene and the Evolution, you are right about our genome carrying information from our ancestors from the different biological entities that have existed before us up to the Last Universal Common Ancestor. Some has been lost, some has been produced through the duplication, segregation and evolution of novel functions, but some is quite ancient too. So yes, it is the genetic information that is climbing the stairs of evolution towards some Omega point while we are just the carriers.
That is one of the reasons I care so much about my genetic lineage. It is in very real and material terms a chain linking me both to the beginnings of life on this planet, and (if things go well and we don't get a nuclear war because of Bakhmut or Artyomovsk), to some future lifeforms whom might well one day live somewhere far away outside our small blue sphere.Replies: @Dmitry
I'm not exactly sure I understand what you mean by "culturally and politically swamped". Everyone has their own country and culture, many of the political views are aligned, and it would be more about coordination, rather than creating a full on confederation. Substance and content is more important than formalities.Replies: @songbird
I have a lot of trouble categorizing AP, on various grounds, but I am not altogether convinced that he wants the same endpoint as you. Outside of Ukraine (where he seems to be some weird Poland-Galician integrationalist), he appears to be a vehement anti-nationalist.
But beyond that, we have seen the path of the EU, and I am convinced that it is the organic path of any such organization. Meaning, I think you would need to design a system which would prevent the elites from eroding national boundaries, and it is probably harder than just putting a law or regulation down on paper. It would need to be incentivized and run through simulations, and be over-engineered by a factor of four. That is, if you want to keep some national identity.
But even for those who aren’t attached to it, and don’t mind their neighbors. There is the tendency to keep growing and accepting new neighbors, and new peoples. You still would need a new national identity to prevent that, and it is not guaranteed they would give it to you.
Keeping control of education is key. Many have warned of this: (1) If the "have nots" can destroy workers via wealth extraction -- cohesiveness is a pipe dream. Similarly, if multiculturalists can swamp unifying nationalism, the system will inevitability fail.
If nations are to have elections, then the system needs restrictions. Heinlein's Starship Troopers introduced the idea of full citizens with the vote, recognized residents with rights but no vote. However it was not dwelled on in depth. Limiting the vote to only committed nationalists makes a great deal of sense. How would one design such a system?
PEACE 😇
___________
(1) https://www.thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/Replies: @songbird
I am basically a traditionalist. I like Austria-Hungary and PLC more then I like nation-states. Monarchs, Churches, aristocrats, parliaments (depending on one’s traditions) rather than demagogue-led “peoples assemblies” in charge. Monarchs constrained by tradition rather than “enlightened despots.” From this perspective, the American experiment has been an interesting mixed bag, both counter-revolutionary and revolutionary at the same time.
I am more of a fan of local identities than of “national identities” constructed by some 19th century Romantics. But I share with my local Romantics an aversion towards foreign invaders.Replies: @Greasy William, @LatW
We think about our nonhuman ancestors which we still primarily continue. We are primarily constitution of nonhuman history as human history is only recent part of story.There is our ancestor "Purgatorius", who is the first primate. A very high proportion of our current genes would be used by, or using (in "self gene theory"), "Purgatorius". https://i.imgur.com/dO8vumu.jpg
Our early vertebrate ancestor was something which lived in coastal waters as this, which also already would have mostly the same genes we have. https://i.imgur.com/1JD4PeC.jpg But are we as "eukaryotes" created by conjunction of single-cell animals entering each other. https://i.imgur.com/BjSNeoZ.jpg
Is categorization as a single animal just a language concept or is it related to the consciousness?Replies: @Ivashka the fool
An excellent question.
From a very tangible and material pov, we are not individuals, but colonies of specialized cells working together as an organism. Our consciousness allows us to see ourselves as an entity, but this view is misleading and is due to the way our brain processes information. I think we should see our personality as an attractor for the many non linear streams of information that our being is woven from.
Regarding the selfish gene and the Evolution, you are right about our genome carrying information from our ancestors from the different biological entities that have existed before us up to the Last Universal Common Ancestor. Some has been lost, some has been produced through the duplication, segregation and evolution of novel functions, but some is quite ancient too. So yes, it is the genetic information that is climbing the stairs of evolution towards some Omega point while we are just the carriers.
That is one of the reasons I care so much about my genetic lineage. It is in very real and material terms a chain linking me both to the beginnings of life on this planet, and (if things go well and we don’t get a nuclear war because of Bakhmut or Artyomovsk), to some future lifeforms whom might well one day live somewhere far away outside our small blue sphere.
From a very tangible and material pov, we are not individuals, but colonies of specialized cells working together as an organism. Our consciousness allows us to see ourselves as an entity, but this view is misleading and is due to the way our brain processes information. I think we should see our personality as an attractor for the many non linear streams of information that our being is woven from.
Regarding the selfish gene and the Evolution, you are right about our genome carrying information from our ancestors from the different biological entities that have existed before us up to the Last Universal Common Ancestor. Some has been lost, some has been produced through the duplication, segregation and evolution of novel functions, but some is quite ancient too. So yes, it is the genetic information that is climbing the stairs of evolution towards some Omega point while we are just the carriers.
That is one of the reasons I care so much about my genetic lineage. It is in very real and material terms a chain linking me both to the beginnings of life on this planet, and (if things go well and we don't get a nuclear war because of Bakhmut or Artyomovsk), to some future lifeforms whom might well one day live somewhere far away outside our small blue sphere.Replies: @Dmitry
In this theory, the genes use the animal as a physical media (of course, the genes are also physical, but the information encoded surpasses the chains of protein).
Then genes could be seen as information encoded by the physical media (animals). In the interaction of physical media (animals) with environment and time, the animals are like the past answer sheets for exams. How correct the answers can be, is regularly tested by evolution. It is a data processing (with some competitive activities similar to some methods already used in machine learning like generative adversarial networks).
I was asking about this film https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.I._Artificial_Intelligence#Plot I think people in the forum could find the story interesting.
It reminded of your posts. Although the answer of the writers is different.
I am wondering why this movie brought my ramblings on this forum to your mind and how you have linked it with the evolution of information towards consciousness. I haven't had any philosophical musings about it at the time, unlike after seeing the Matrix. I have just found it touching and sad, and in a sense it made me think of Solaris (the book by Lem, not the movie by Tarkovsky) because of the unrequited love of the robot kid for "his mother" and the impossibility of reaching an objective state of connection to the other.
But yes, coming back to what we discussed earlier, basically what we are witnessing is information evolving towards forms of organisation that are more adapted to manipulate matter/energy/information itself, these three semantic categories being human-made descriptors for the Ontological Reality (Whole of Being in itself).
I (perhaps wrongly) believe that the True Nature of Ontological Reality is ineffable. Anything that can be said about it is just descriptors - human made definitions - words. These words are the product of our consciousness effected by our perception that has been shaped and biased in a certain (practical and useful) sense by the evolution. As an example, we see colors and not wavelengths of photons, we feel solid and material something that is made of 99,9999... void etc. Of course what I write here is platitudes and clichés, but I think that they correspond to our existential situation which is basically wrong perception inevitably leading to ignorance (that's the core of Buddhadharma here).
What is more peculiar is that we have a difficult time defining information itself. My idiosyncratic definition of information is "any pattern of distribution of matter/energy that can be detected by any type of receptor". It doesn't necessarily contain meaning and is not necessarily connected to anything except a stochastic distribution of bits. Now, out of necessity,any receptor is itself a "pattern of distribution of matter/energy" therefore it is itself a sum of information - an "information system". Following from here information is perceived by information and processed as information. We live in an information Reality we are information ourselves.
If we add to it that according to modern physics, everything can be reduced to quarks, leptons, gluons etc. and that those can be described as potential in their respective quantum fields that "permeate" (for a lack of better word) our Universe, and that quantum fields are basically more aptly described as mathematical functions, then we see that the closest we can get to Ontological Reality is information expressed as mathematics which are inherently incomplete in Gödel's meaning.
Perhaps that's what a Sufi could term "the Veil of ignorance" that is made as an Orthodox Christian would perhaps say of "subtle energies" of the Palamite Theology hiding the Essence (Ousia) of God. Then the Sufi and the Orthodox Christian might discuss it with a Buddhist who would note that the experience of this Ontological Reality is of necessity a physico-psychological one, made in the here and now, as constructed from elemental units - the dharmas. And the Hinduist would concur that "Tat tvam asi" (You are that).
Then the Atheist would call 911 and send them all to a mental asylum for not stopping at the Veil of Ignorance and trying to imagine something beneath it.
Sorry, I digresses again. Same as usual.
Not sure whether what I wrote makes any sense. But I would like to read what you think of it. And thanks of making me think realize that AI algorithms are sometimes (or is it always?) using competing neural network models. Very interesting, I will have to read about it.
🙂Replies: @Dmitry
It was 200,000 years of human population to increase to the first 1 billion, while since 2011 the population has increased by 1 billion. This is the first 200,000 years of our history (198,200 BC - 1800 AD) added the same number of people to the population, as the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD). So, the last 11 years (2011-2022 AD) has added more humans to world population, than the first 200,000 years of human history (196,200 BC- 1800 AD).Natural population of humans was around 20,000 people for most our history. While today there are 60 times more Latvians, than the world population of humans our ancestors were living in.This is one of the main examples where we are not psychologically adapted. For example, we lived in societies with around 80 people.Our mind is designed for these societies of 80 people, not societies with 146,000,000 people (population of the Russian Federation), or 330,000,000 (population of the United States of America), or 1,400,000,000 people (population of China). There is a bit of different between what we are designed for, 80 people, or where Chinese live today 1,400,000,000.If you live in a society with 80 people, it would be normal to see familiar people as your friends. But in the 21st century, familiar people are celebrities, politicians.They are people who rationally have no connection to us, but emotionally we view like they are friends. Sometimes they can be even the most dangerous people (i.e. our politicians), but our mind perceives them like a friendly grandfather.–*Constant increase in population of humans is because of creating artificial nature. Normal animals in our level in the food chain are like polar bears, lions, great apes or bears.Animals which are high in the food chain like humans are designed for small populations like 1000-30,000, not 8,000,000,000. Except humans, the only large animals with those numbers are semi-artificial animals, which humans farm for food like cows and sheeps.Replies: @Ivashka the fool, @AP
Why do you think our evolution stopped 20,000 years ago?
In most of Europe, Middle East, and Asia people have lived in populated agricultural communities for thousands of years and in urban environments for many hundreds of years.
Writing was invented by Sumerians around 200 generations past. For many of our ancestors only had experience of writing for 4-8 generations. Humans were living for over 8000 generations without writing and the pre-humans (which is most of our adaptations for the environment) 1000,000,000,000 of generations without writing.Replies: @AP, @Yahya
Re. the acceptability of war in Europe. I think we are undergoing a regression of social norms. My opinion is that it started in the West in 2001 after the Twin Towers attack. It started in the former USSR earlier in late 80ies and early 90ies with all the ethnic strife and the criminal and political violence.
I think we are devolving toward more tribalism everywhere. I don't think that this is entirely negative. Humans need a clan and a tribe to rely upon. Progress has deprived them from that, the regression & archaization would probably bring it back.Replies: @Mikel
This is the crux of the issue, imho. I don’t have much time to elaborate but we humans evolved for hundreds of thousands of years as a tribal species. During all of that time using violence to keep outsiders away from our hunting-gathering space made perfect sense, from a survival perspective. Defending your tribe was just a natural extension of defending your family, which not even the most extremist pacifists would object to, I think. And even if we hadn’t have that particular evolution we have the same territorial instinct of all members of the animalia group in the eukaryotes domain.
People may rationalize the necessity of war in many different ways but it all boils down to our very deep, ancestral instincts. However, we don’t live in tribal structures anymore at all. Nation states are a very novel, abstract structure that mimics the tribe that, as you correctly point out, we still feel the need to belong to but are radically different. People being rounded up in Odessa to be forced to kill what they perhaps consider their own kin is the perfect example of this difference.
Besides, we are the only rational species on this planet. Chimpanzees may go to war against a neighboring group and use much more violence than necessary without giving it any thought or feeling any moral compunction but our brains evolved too much and we are not like that.
In fact, our brains have evolved so much that we have now made our planet enter the nuclear era and we can turn one of our old territorial disputes into a global catastrophic event, which history and human nature suggest will happen sooner or later. So, paradoxically, our survival now depends on being able to put under strict control an instinct that until recently was beneficial for our survival.
In other words, I agree with you on the importance of the human tribal dimension but I disagree on the benefits of turning back to it in the present circumstances.
But beyond that, we have seen the path of the EU, and I am convinced that it is the organic path of any such organization. Meaning, I think you would need to design a system which would prevent the elites from eroding national boundaries, and it is probably harder than just putting a law or regulation down on paper. It would need to be incentivized and run through simulations, and be over-engineered by a factor of four. That is, if you want to keep some national identity.
But even for those who aren't attached to it, and don't mind their neighbors. There is the tendency to keep growing and accepting new neighbors, and new peoples. You still would need a new national identity to prevent that, and it is not guaranteed they would give it to you.Replies: @LatW, @A123, @AP
I took a long time “categorizing” him, too, but I was able to finally (he’s rather complex, with a mix of ideas and predispositions that are not always consistent or immediately visible to non-Anglos, but in the US it is possible to be that way).
Yes, that is problematic, but he has a right to his ideology and outlook, this may be what happens when you have an immigrant country (at home he would be more balanced, and, btw, there is nothing wrong with Poland-Galician integrationalism at all). America has to pay for everyone she takes in that way. So far America has been strong… but at this point America’s burden is not light. It attests to America’s strength.
Not fully, but there is a rather significant overlap. I won’t dissect him because, in this particular time and space, he’s a friendly. Besides, the “endpoint”, as you say, will not be something that either he, nor I, nor you will decide on our own, most likely. It will be a larger collective of people. We can only contribute our energy and hopes.
There are such systems in the Intermarium, but they are not ideal. These things need to be constantly managed. Elites and the military, as well as the police, need to be held to high standards but also have respect. The civic society needs to be free but similarly as the state institutions, needs to be held to a high accountability.
And even tough and rigorous bureaucracy. A bureaucrat gets to approve somebody’s asylum or immigration application – you don’t want to leave that decision to be based on their mood or what they had for lunch, but based on intelligence, a strong patriotic conviction and, ideally, the interests of the nation (hopefully, in a way that you and I understand it). All of these components need to be in place. Ideology is important, even if it is not voiced in words and political documents, but in other symbols and gestures that everyone understands without saying.
We used to have a totalitarian society where others took care of this. But when one has freedom, the most valuable gift, one has to have self-discipline. The classical Greek culture teaches us to question things the way Socrates did, the Socratic method is still useful – when someone proposes something for your state and nation, question it. Ask simple questions – “Is this needed?”, “Why?”, “How is this good for the children?”. Do not just accept it. Question it just for the sake of it.. question it openly. 🙂
No need to exaggerate, just have a normal, strict common sense approach. That’s why formalities are a good thing to have, as I said, but they are not the most important. A nation, a tribe, a family, a family of similar peoples, needs to be able to stand without a state (most nations in history have been that way). But a strong state and an ideology is still important, to have more than one layer of protection. A nation is like a warrior and a strong, nationalist state is like a shield.
Our neighbors are static and have been static for millennia or for hundreds of years. I guess we are lucky that way. But the EU neighbors, in the future, will need a discussion. We go back to Socrates, we question, instead of just accepting things as a given.
It is our own job to nurture our identity, but I don’t agree that “they” can give us anything or take our national identity, as easily as you seem to assume. They know how important it is, they are careful, that’s why they have had a “soft” approach. More dangerous for us that way, actually. You know how you walk during a blizzard on a snowed in path, really freezing? When you reach the limit of your strength you fall down comfortably in the snow and start falling asleep.. they say it’s the most pleasant feeling. It’s the feeling right before you die and they teach you to fight that pleasant sleep, to bring yourself out of it, to keep yourself alert.
I'm in full agreement with Kevin MacDonald that at the time the Immigration Act of 1924 was signed the imported by diktat East European wage slaves (aka 'immigrants') should of been deported en masse back to their countries of origin.
With some noble exceptions, they would seem to be a bunch of narcissistic, self-centered, arrogant, shameless, grifters, willing tools of the so called 'progressives', AP being a prime example of the type whose own words condemn him.
The other Anglosphere countries should of done the very same thing.Replies: @LatW, @sudden death, @AP, @Leaves No Shadow
IMO, you must look West and seek to prevent what happened there, and it requires more than optimism and resolve. It requires vigilence, tactics, and strategy. Organization, and mechanism.
Make an analogy to war. War has changed and evolved dramatically. Nobody would think of bringing Macedonian tactics, as good as they were in their day, to a modern battlefield.
Well, there is another kind of war, today: the war for identity. And I hope you will not be so dismissive of us Western Euros as to think that we wanted to give up our identity. Honestly, to a large extent, it has been usurped. We may not all recognize the claims of the usurpers, but it is easy to recognize their level of success.
The promotion of terms, like 'white Irish' and 'white British.' Once, 'American' even meant something highly specific. In the dictionary, for American, it said 'white person', but that was really just shorthand for a narrow circle of the world, NW Europe, where we had a lot in common culturally and genetically. I don't think anyone really wanted to give that up - actual meaning to the word, an ethnic label - but it has been usurped. And it is funny to see all sorts of genetically distant people, alien-looking and acting, unalike in every conceivable way, and severely wanting in some, demand that Chinese and Japanese recognize them as Americans, and portray them as such. What loyalty have they shown us? And yet they want our identity, and indeed have robbed us of it to a very large extent.
This is why I tell you that I think that identity is important, and you need a strong conception of it, which must extend beyond the spiritual and into the physical. Into public organizations with resources, intelligence and hierarchy. Perhaps, I am preaching to the choir, but just so you don't misunderstand my meaning.Replies: @LatW
Nowadays, the time of classical Empires is over. Now it is time for federations and confederations. Vyacheslav Chornovil, one of the most respected Ukrainian nationalists of the early independent Ukraine, had in his time warned that the Ukrainian state would better be a federation instead of attempting at imposing an unified "one size fits all" approach to all the regions. He had also suggested giving a very large level of autonomy to Crimea.
He was an intelligent person. If Ukrainian political circles would have headed his advice, there would have been no war.Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP
It’s been a long, long time since I’ve read his famous political manifesto “Boomerang”, and he may have been another Skoropadsky type who was all over the board depending on the time of day, but I don’t remember him advocating a federative approach for Ukraine? During my college days, I was involved in getting him to come to Mpls when he first was released, even met with him privately in his hotel room after he got through with his big meeting with the whole diaspora crowd.
This is the Valentyn Moroz that I remember:
I don’t think that he would chacterize Zelensky as such today.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentyn_Moroz
Also your speech. They would control your thoughts if they had the power to do so. Attempting to control our thoughts will consume an increasing fraction of resources.
Ted Kaczynski had a better plan and his plan was retarded.Replies: @Beckow
Well, I am glad you took my screed against the lazy, parasitic Western middle classes seriously :)…
On second thought, given the risks to my steaks, I will reconsider and let them stay…could they in turn be nice enough to stay mostly home, watch their stupid tv and video games, and refrain from marching around nature and picturesque old towns? Also, leave the fat wives (of all genders) home…we need to get back to some semblance of civilization…
As for your picturesque old towns, perhaps you might maybe lobby with your local tourist board to discourage fat tourists? Those fat bus seats look like a juicy target. If nothing else works you could send them an anonymous message that if they don't retire the buses it would be a real shame if something happened to them.
Do your local grocery stores have fat shopper vehicles? They have been standard in American grocery stores for many years and are as good a coal mine canary as any society could ever want.
On the other hand this probably is a subject you don't want to get me started on. : )
https://c8.alamy.com/comp/R4096E/large-heavy-woman-shopper-on-in-store-use-only-electric-shopping-scooter-R4096E.jpgReplies: @Mikhail, @Beckow
Russia is erasing towns and thousands of Russian-speaking people.
An honest person would admit which action is closer to genocide. It has increased since the war as companies have moved from places like Kharkiv and many more of Ukraine’s 200,000 IT workers have transferred to Lviv:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/22/business/ukraine-tech-companies-putin.html
The entire country of Slovakia only has 28k such workers:
https://www.itminions.be/en/blog/slo