Open Thread 179: Russia/Ukraine Cont
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Like it or not, but shock and disbelief is inevitable.
Follow @akarlin0

Like it or not, but shock and disbelief is inevitable.
Volnovakha taken by the DPR.
Shock and disbelief at what? Come on, Karlin, what’s your prediction?
I think that this is 70% likely: Russia keeps grinding away, and within six weeks controls much or all of eastern and southern Ukraine. But they’ll have taken a very high number of casualties — they already have — and they experience a great deal of trouble in holding and administering the territory.
20% likely: Russia is still stalled in six weeks, and has not achieved firm control over southern and eastern Ukraine.
7% likely: Negotiations succeed and Russia withdraws in exchange for recognition of Crimea, a binding neutrality agreement from Ukraine, some measure of independence for Luhansk and Donetsk, etc.
3% likely: Every other outcome, e.g.: Russia conquers the whole of the Ukraine. Or Poland enters the conflict. Or NATO enters the conflict. Or Japan attempts to take everything up to Sakhalin. Basically, every “wild card” outcome. The wild cards are not exactly unlikely on the whole, but each one is individually unlikely.
My point is that Russia turning things around and rapidly conquering the whole of the Ukraine would be shocking, but I think that it’s very unlikely. The most likely outcomes are not shocking, they are merely depressing.
Some good articles by the ambassador.
https://www.indianpunchline.com/zelensky-rubbishes-bidens-war-on-russia/
https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/4/21559/Russia-Enters-Successful-Endgame-Ukraine-Signals-No-NATO
Pointless war, knew it would end soon when world Jewry raised concerns at the money various oligarchs were losing. In that sense Ukraine truly is a Western country.
Ukraine will rebuild, the period of CIA and oligarch rule will be as discredited as the nineties were for Russia. The damage to US prestige and the dollar system will be permanent.
If we knew answers to these questions a lot about Ukraine's near future would become clear.Replies: @Seraphim, @Reactive Reaction
I think that this is 70% likely: Russia keeps grinding away, and within six weeks controls much or all of eastern and southern Ukraine. But they'll have taken a very high number of casualties -- they already have -- and they experience a great deal of trouble in holding and administering the territory.
20% likely: Russia is still stalled in six weeks, and has not achieved firm control over southern and eastern Ukraine.
7% likely: Negotiations succeed and Russia withdraws in exchange for recognition of Crimea, a binding neutrality agreement from Ukraine, some measure of independence for Luhansk and Donetsk, etc.
3% likely: Every other outcome, e.g.: Russia conquers the whole of the Ukraine. Or Poland enters the conflict. Or NATO enters the conflict. Or Japan attempts to take everything up to Sakhalin. Basically, every "wild card" outcome. The wild cards are not exactly unlikely on the whole, but each one is individually unlikely.
My point is that Russia turning things around and rapidly conquering the whole of the Ukraine would be shocking, but I think that it's very unlikely. The most likely outcomes are not shocking, they are merely depressing.Replies: @inertial
I remember 20 years ago, in the first weeks of the second Gulf War, there was a lot of talk that American offensive had stalled and that America was losing in Iraq. Wise heads responded that things would be going slowly until they reached a breaking point–and then they’d go very fast. And this is exactly what happened in Iraq. It’s still the most likely scenario in the Ukraine.
2. We had a complete and total control of the air and a whole host of advantages that the Russian military does not enjoy currently.
3. That doesn't mean Russians would not prevail ultimately, but using historical analogies that bear little resemblance to different combatants in very different conditions isn't very fruitful.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @AP, @Anatoly Karlin, @inertial
Speaking of Ukrainian oligarchs, I wonder what they are doing. Are they making deals right now? What kind? With whom?
If we knew answers to these questions a lot about Ukraine’s near future would become clear.
The trouble with Israel, from the oligarch POV, is that they could wind up with a shitty apartment surrounded by Haredim and no dock space for the yacht. And Florida is overbuilt.Replies: @Dmitry
Winston Churchill’s strategic and military analysis of the German invasion of Poland and the subsequent Soviet invasion of Poland. Why didn’t the French and British declare war on Stalin for invading Poland too?
“Russians were guilty of gross treachery during the recent negotiations, but Marshal Voroshilov’s demand that the Russian armies, if they were allies of Poland, should occupy Vilnius and Lvov was a perfectly reasonable military demand. It was rejected by Poland, whose arguments, despite their naturalness, cannot be considered satisfactory in the light of current events. As a result, Russia took up the same positions as an enemy of Poland that it might have taken as a very dubious and suspected friend. The difference is actually not as great as it might seem. The Russians mobilized a very large force and showed that they were able to move quickly and far from their pre-war positions. They now border on Germany, and the latter is completely unable to expose the Eastern front. A large German army will have to be left behind to monitor it. As far as I know, General Hamelin estimates its strength at least 20 divisions, but there may well be 25 or even more. Therefore, the Eastern front potentially exists.
Russia is pursuing a cold policy of its own interests. We would prefer that the Russian armies stand in their present positions as friends and allies of Poland, rather than as invaders. But to protect Russia from the Nazi threat, it was clearly necessary that Russian armies should stand on this line. In any case, this line exists and, consequently, the Eastern front has been created, which Nazi Germany will not dare to attack…”
Advice from the top military establishment. It created a Cold Eastern Front. They were always hoping that Hitler might attack Stalin, or that the Russians might attack Germany. Proved to be decisive. Poles are nothing but a pain in the backside. Brave lads but essentially an annoyance.
Russia is pursuing a cold policy of its own interests. We would prefer that the Russian armies stand in their present positions as friends and allies of Poland, rather than as invaders. But to protect Russia from the Nazi threat, it was clearly necessary that Russian armies should stand on this line. In any case, this line exists and, consequently, the Eastern front has been created, which Nazi Germany will not dare to attack...”Advice from the top military establishment. It created a Cold Eastern Front. They were always hoping that Hitler might attack Stalin, or that the Russians might attack Germany. Proved to be decisive. Poles are nothing but a pain in the backside. Brave lads but essentially an annoyance.Replies: @Aedib
Poland is the hyena of Europe (Winston Churchill)
https://www.indianpunchline.com/zelensky-rubbishes-bidens-war-on-russia/
https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/4/21559/Russia-Enters-Successful-Endgame-Ukraine-Signals-No-NATO
Pointless war, knew it would end soon when world Jewry raised concerns at the money various oligarchs were losing. In that sense Ukraine truly is a Western country.Replies: @Levtraro
Thanks. The ambassador is a jewel of Indian intelligentzia.
1. That all ended in tears for us Americans. We did lose in Iraq in the end.
2. We had a complete and total control of the air and a whole host of advantages that the Russian military does not enjoy currently.
3. That doesn’t mean Russians would not prevail ultimately, but using historical analogies that bear little resemblance to different combatants in very different conditions isn’t very fruitful.
Russia launched a small number of missile strikes on military objects before going up against a 95 IQ military, and yet that regardless, its rate of advance has been comparable. (In retrospect, there certainly wasn't near enough shock and awe at the beginning, naive and humane Russians underestimated the degree to which Ukrainians had been brainwashed into their Banderist cult).Replies: @Veteran of the Memic Wars, @AP, @Twinkie
- I guess it's forgotten now, but Iraq was quiescent for 2-3 months after the the active, "kinetic" phase of the war. But American civilian administration was bumbling around and the military maintained a "light footprint" (remember this phrase?) so US won the war but then eventually lost the peace. Will Russians do the same mistake? Possibly. But you can be sure that Russians know Ukrainians much better than Americans knew Iraqis.
- This is true, but on the other hand Russians do enjoy some advantages as compared to Americans in Iraq. For example, Russian army is fighting on its own turf.
- Last but not least, I didn't really intend to make an exhaustive comparison of the US campaign in Iraq vs. the Russian campaign in Ukraine. I am just using that war to make a simple point: Things happen gradually and then they happen suddenly. You shouldn't make linear extrapolations. This does not necessarily mean that the breaking point is inevitable (e.g. Russia may leave after reaching a diplomatic agreement.) But this is the way to bet.
2. We had a complete and total control of the air and a whole host of advantages that the Russian military does not enjoy currently.
3. That doesn't mean Russians would not prevail ultimately, but using historical analogies that bear little resemblance to different combatants in very different conditions isn't very fruitful.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @AP, @Anatoly Karlin, @inertial
If I travelled back in time and talked individually to each Russian partisan on this site and informed them of how the war had gone by now, they would be totally shocked and would never believe me.
If I then informed Putin of the same, he would not have launched this idiotic, cruel war. End of.
It’s like you all paid a huge amount for a buffet, found out that the food is extremely rotten and going to kill you, but keep shovelling it all down your throats to get your “money’s worth”.
Cretins.
(Sorry Twinkie, this was not aimed at you but I am still reply limited so I don’t want to delete and re-write as I get 3 in 24 hours.)
Amazing if true. Ukraine may have taken out a Russian ship using a land-based MRLS system:
2. We had a complete and total control of the air and a whole host of advantages that the Russian military does not enjoy currently.
3. That doesn't mean Russians would not prevail ultimately, but using historical analogies that bear little resemblance to different combatants in very different conditions isn't very fruitful.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @AP, @Anatoly Karlin, @inertial
What do you guess the likely outcome will be?
That goes double for any kind of combat, where there are opposing wills. Recently another commenter asked for my opinion of what would happen in a particular MMA fight, and I answered similarly. There are just too many unpredictable variables in war, as in a person-to-person fight. In the latter, there is a saying, "So-and-so is totally going to win this fight... unless he slips on a banana peel or something." Well, the world is full of banana peels. So I only offered up what I saw as strengths and weaknesses of each fighter.
I don't have anything original to add about the current Russo-Ukrainian conflict, but I will just make a few personal comments and observations:
1. I was surprised that the Russian air force has not achieved a total control of the air and has not provided a completely dominant overwatch and close air support. I read a number of different theories as to why, but the most plausible explanations (at least to me) seem to be that a) Russian air crews are not well-trained, certainly not on par with the best of Western air forces and are not proficient in mounting high-complexity joint air operations with a lot of aircraft and coordinating ground elements and b) the Russians don't appear to have a large stockpile of precision-guided munitions, with which to launch highly precise attacks on the ground. In absence of those, launching night attacks (to avoid MANPADs) with dumb bombs is bound to be inaccurate and ineffective - and much more likely incur collateral damage.
2. I was also surprised with how easily some Russian armored vehicle columns were ambushed by the Ukrainians in the early part of the war. As a number of observers pointed out, Russian ground forces - here and there - seemed not to operate well as combined arms teams, with armor, infantry, and artillery mutually supporting and covering for each other in advances. That's something one expects of poorly-trained and -motivated conscripts. Given the increasing professionalization of the Russian army in the past decade, I expected a much greater facility in combined arms operations especially at the small scale, tactical level.
3. As well, I found the Ukrainian resistance to be unexpectedly fierce so far. I generally have a pretty dim view of the training level, morale, and effectiveness of armed forces personnel below the first-tier military nations, so I thought the Ukrainians would crumble rather quickly. I think their unexpectedly better resistance forced a re-evaluation and re-thinking on the part of the Western nations, that likely would have written off the conquest of Ukraine, albeit with a lot of verbal furor, denunciations, and recriminations. I certainly did not expect the former comedian president of Ukraine to be so inspirational to his countrymen.
4. All this said, I think the conventional war is still Russia's to lose. The fact remains that there is a huge manpower and materiel disparity between the two forces in Russia's favor. I would think a more salient question wouldn't be so much about whether Russia will or will not win, but how much losses and suffering Russia is willing to incur and to inflict in order to achieve the said victory. For that matter, while Ukrainian morale seems to holding up well so far, formal resistance could collapse quickly if the Ukrainian national command authority were to be captured or killed. These are intangibles that cannot be measured or predicted.
5. Of course, that then begs the question: even if Russia were to win (which is not in any way guaranteed), what will a Russian occupation look like? Israeli military theorist Martin van Creveld once wrote that, in a post-modern world, when the strong fights the weak in a long war, the strong loses. Having failed to topple Ukraine in a lightning attack, Russia will have to use much more destructive means to achieve victory, which will only embitter the population it was supposed to "liberate," even setting aside the enormous international opprobrium. Although hardly assured one way or another, the prospect of a Russian victory being Pyrrhic and the conquest of Ukraine being a poisoned pill cannot be dismissed easily.
6. Yet another question, which I am not in any way qualified answer, is the issue of domestic consensus in Russia. Putin is an undisputed authoritarian leader, but he is not a God-Emperor. Surely he is to a varying degree sensitive to the Russian "street" opinion and domestic legitimacy. As with the CCP in China, I think Putin derives much of that domestic legitimacy from the fact that his rule has coincided with the re-rise of Russia as a world player, not to forget the rise in living standards. I cannot even begin to predict how and to what extent Russia's economy and standard of living will be affected by this war and how long the current domestic consensus (53% or something close to it supporting the war) would persist in the face of varying scenarios of negative outcomes (one shouldn't forget the effect of the Afghan War on the Soviet Union, which turned out to be far more sensitive to losses of its young men than the supposedly more brittle American domestic morale in Vietnam).
I guess this is a rather longwinded version of "Things turned out differently than I thought, and I have no clue what's going to happen next." ;)Replies: @Blinky Bill, @AP
A funny comment: why did Sleepy Joe not went to beg for oil to the “true” Venezuelan President, Juan Guaido?
-1- National leaders are busy people who do not waste their time meeting with someone who is irrelevant. Thus, Guaido refused to meet with Not-The-President Biden.
-2- Puppeteers controlling the current administration deliberately chose to "maximize evil". They can do more damage by encouraging Maduro.
PEACE 😇
Speaking of BFFs and allies:
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/9/saudi-arabia-uae-leaders-decline-calls-biden-amid-/
It doesn’t seem like that long ago that none would dare dissing the Prez like this.
Regardless of the final calculus in Ukraine the world is feeling a lot more multi-polar these days. Even Europe seems intent to chart it's own course to a greater extent.Replies: @iffen
I am curious where all this is headed.
PCR raises interesting concerns-too slow, too nice-too much time for the west to meddle.
I can only think about what I know- the slavs I know write brilliant code-but it is very buggy, lots of loose ends.
One has to remember that the west is run by the devil himself-8000 years old, the demon has seen it all and knows every angle to play. A loose end is bound to be pulled.
I am still convinced that Russia will have to waste a NATO country before it is all over.
Which probably means nuclear war.
It’s all over for the ukrocels.
While they rhapsodize over maps deluding themselves Russians only control “main roads” and trumpet individual Ukrainian victories (about 75% fake) and alleged Russian atrocities (99% fake and gay… Russia has conducted this war with truly Christ-like humaneness, American military fighting Neo-Nazi terrorists who shelter in kindergartens would have produced 5,000 civilian deaths by now instead of 500), the Donbass punishers are being progressively encircled with Mariupol fully encircled and reduced daily, the logistical hub of Izyum in particular now under Russian control, and the Lugansk forces on the verge of being completely surrounded, the ring of steel around Kiev is tightening with the main road west to Zhitomir cut off as of yesterday latest, meanwhile another armored spearhead races unopposed to encircle Nikolaev. Ukrainian air assets, AA, and armor have been progressively attritioned to very low levels, such that they no longer even bother with ridiculous claims like 30 helicopter kills and the like.
All of this will become progressively more and more obvious to the deluded and low IQ here over the next ten days. As I keep saying, the greater the delusion, the greater the resulting shock and disbelief once the inevitable comes to fruition.
Just curious, given that you seem to have high opinon of him. ;)
Recently the DrudgeReport headlines also make interesting read. It got me wondering how much I can trust the impression I got there regarding American domestic issues. 😂Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
2. We had a complete and total control of the air and a whole host of advantages that the Russian military does not enjoy currently.
3. That doesn't mean Russians would not prevail ultimately, but using historical analogies that bear little resemblance to different combatants in very different conditions isn't very fruitful.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @AP, @Anatoly Karlin, @inertial
Americans softened up the 85 IQ Iraqi military with no outside support after a month of heavy bombing including civilian infrastructure.
Russia launched a small number of missile strikes on military objects before going up against a 95 IQ military, and yet that regardless, its rate of advance has been comparable. (In retrospect, there certainly wasn’t near enough shock and awe at the beginning, naive and humane Russians underestimated the degree to which Ukrainians had been brainwashed into their Banderist cult).
But I know a lot less about Russia than you do so...
Missile strikes began March 19th. Army rolled in March 22nd.
My March 27th, the Americans had established control over Nasiriyah (population 500,000 at the time). That's after only 8 days.
After 13 days, the largest city the Russians control is Kherson (population 300,000).
American + Brits lost only 200 troops during the entire Iraq invasion.
Russians already have lost at least 1,000 by Russian estimates (they estimated 500 a few days ago), most likely 2,000 or so. So far, according to UN estimates, Russians have killed about 500 Ukrainian civilians yesterday.
Entire Iraq invasion had 3,200 to 7,000 civilian deaths so Russia is on track to kill as many Ukrainian civilians as the low estimate of Iraqi civilian deaths.
So Russians are killing about as many civilians in Ukraine as Americans did in Iraq, but are losing an order of magnitude more soldiers while gaining population centers more slowly. And they are managing to do this not on another continent but right next door to their homeland. What a senseless debacle.Replies: @Wokechoke
Prescient. Prophetic.
How so? The Russians are methodically taking over the country. It’s only the msm that claimed the Russians expected an immediate surrender. It takes time to move 100,000 troops along with supplies. We once did an exercise where we moved about 500 men from Arizona to Texas and it took us almost a week just to get set up and our only enemy was the sun. I am unaware of any war against a decent sized country that was over in less than 35 days. That was German and Soviet Union invasion of Poland in 1939. Took US 2 months to dispose of the 3rd world Iraq in a mostly open desert.
While they rhapsodize over maps deluding themselves Russians only control "main roads" and trumpet individual Ukrainian victories (about 75% fake) and alleged Russian atrocities (99% fake and gay... Russia has conducted this war with truly Christ-like humaneness, American military fighting Neo-Nazi terrorists who shelter in kindergartens would have produced 5,000 civilian deaths by now instead of 500), the Donbass punishers are being progressively encircled with Mariupol fully encircled and reduced daily, the logistical hub of Izyum in particular now under Russian control, and the Lugansk forces on the verge of being completely surrounded, the ring of steel around Kiev is tightening with the main road west to Zhitomir cut off as of yesterday latest, meanwhile another armored spearhead races unopposed to encircle Nikolaev. Ukrainian air assets, AA, and armor have been progressively attritioned to very low levels, such that they no longer even bother with ridiculous claims like 30 helicopter kills and the like.
All of this will become progressively more and more obvious to the deluded and low IQ here over the next ten days. As I keep saying, the greater the delusion, the greater the resulting shock and disbelief once the inevitable comes to fruition.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @silviosilver, @Aedib, @yakushimaru
This is a good attempt to be positive, but let’s be serious: these are Russian tasks in order of difficulty. The further down the list is the harder they will be to achieve. Basically increasing by orders of magnitude.
1. Achieve air supremacy.
2. Occupy Mariupol.
It seems like Russia will get here in a week, though it is hardly guaranteed.
3. Occupy Kharkiv.
4. Defeat all Ukrainian forces outside of cities.
5. Occupy Odesa.
6. Occupy Kyiv.
This was supposed to happen in 48 hours. It has no chance of happening any time soon. Can the Russian army be combat effective that long? Probably not.
7. Occupy Lviv
How’s this going to happen?
8. Maintain order in Russia, Belarus, Chechnya etc. under crushing economic depression.
Good luck!
9. Pacify infinitely supplied Ukrainian insurgencies.
Literally a 0% chance of this happening.
Since you’re still struggling with “1” and have no plans for anything above “4”, I would wish you luck but the endeavour is rotten and Lavrov will be sweating buckets to make something approaching a non-losers’ peace tonight.
Honestly, though, I do prefer your attempts at propaganda to someone like Pepe Escobar’s. You seem to be an honest patriot doing your best for a completely insane endeavour. People like Pepe Escobar however are just about the most cringe I can imagine. He doesn’t just write geopolitical fan fiction, he writes geo political fan fiction for late middle-aged male incels – the ultimate in cringe demographics.
And that’s before I get to Ron Unz, whose “contribution” to Putin’s propoganda was to argue that he really is like Hitler and that’s why he is great.
Anybody who isn’t Russian, isn’t directly paid money and is still on the Putin train has outed themselves as manipulatable mush-brained morons.
I respect your efforts as you’ve been dealt an awful hand, but some of your commenters are among the world’s most tragic people. Not because they suffer, but because they’re insufferable.
Anyway, I still think that Russia could play a blinder by somehow joining the EU with Belarus and Ukraine. Don’t ask me how they achieve it, but some sort of perfunctory regime change, false hope and change agenda and riding the wave of Western public elief might actually get you somewhere. At that point, the conservative Slavs really would control Europe. From defeat to victory in a few wonder manouervres.
This is also my favoured option. Probably a fantasy, but a lot more fun than pretending that this war and the sanctions are going as planned.
I don't in general read Ron's pieces because they are so goofy, but that sounds about right and very entertaining - I will have to check that out. .
Wow, well that's a fascinating idea.
There are so many ways to wage war - some of the most subtle can be the most successful.
For the "Slave empire" to actually take over the West from within rather than stupidly confronting it's power - is such subtlety even possible in our blunt, stupid, and crass age?
It would be like Christianity taking over the Roman Empire from within - precisely through a process of refusing to fight it.
Are Slavs approaching their moment in history when they can become a "world historical" people - the moment when they push the engine of history forward?
All peoples more or less get this moment.
Probably not quite yet - but maybe soon. The strength and fervor of the Ukrainian resistance is something deeply interesting and suggestive. Russia in it's current iteration seems played out - only more of the old.
I don't know...
The times are becoming interesting.Replies: @Barbarossa, @Justvisiting
Man, the propoganda war is heating up 🙂
It’s fascinating to me how in our age nothing is simple and clear cut anymore, but everything is “perspective management” and competing narratives.
There is a complete breakdown on what used to be called “consensus reality”. Now all we have is competing narratives.
It was the same with Covid. No “consensus reality” and just a bunch of competing narratives.
If Russian success was obvious and clear cut, Karlin would hardly have to come here with such strident assertions and such insistent insistences.
It was the same with Covid. A clearly deadly or serious plague would hardly have needed such perspective management.
But so it goes in our increasingly weird and not normal age…
In my view, this is a necessary stage in the evolution to something new and a good thing – the old “consensus reality” had obviously outlived its usefulness.
Two possibilities spring to mind:
-1- National leaders are busy people who do not waste their time meeting with someone who is irrelevant. Thus, Guaido refused to meet with Not-The-President Biden.
-2- Puppeteers controlling the current administration deliberately chose to “maximize evil”. They can do more damage by encouraging Maduro.
PEACE 😇
Lol, that was awesomely amusing 🙂
I don’t in general read Ron’s pieces because they are so goofy, but that sounds about right and very entertaining – I will have to check that out.
.
Wow, well that’s a fascinating idea.
There are so many ways to wage war – some of the most subtle can be the most successful.
For the “Slave empire” to actually take over the West from within rather than stupidly confronting it’s power – is such subtlety even possible in our blunt, stupid, and crass age?
It would be like Christianity taking over the Roman Empire from within – precisely through a process of refusing to fight it.
Are Slavs approaching their moment in history when they can become a “world historical” people – the moment when they push the engine of history forward?
All peoples more or less get this moment.
Probably not quite yet – but maybe soon. The strength and fervor of the Ukrainian resistance is something deeply interesting and suggestive. Russia in it’s current iteration seems played out – only more of the old.
I don’t know…
The times are becoming interesting.
--This website where we can seriously debate a variety of topics
--His amusing "resistance" to "crazy conspiracy theories"--They are all "crazy" until the magic moment when he finally believes them--one at a time. All it takes is a couple of "respectable" folks to "get it" and Ron is persuaded. That is a rather creative approach to epistemology.
;-)
The Russians haven’t yet done anything that might be considered hard. My other post to AK has 9 tasks for them to achieve and it would have been the same at the start of the war.
And to achieve nothing real, they have 12,000+ casualties, Generals being killed and ridiculous equipment losses.
The Russian military will need a cease fire in 2 weeks as it will be exhausted. Russia seems to have no operational reserve and troops are already low morale. This is just the way humans are.
Also, you see, war is not about covering miles, but, instead, it is about political goals. And nothing Russia has so far done has helped achieve those goals. In fact, Russia is far further from achieving those goals than it was 3 weeks ago.
Every military commander needs to ask themselves “what have I been told to do and why?”
And the “why?” is the key bit.
The invasion was launched in order to pacify Ukraine under Russian domination. If you can see a way for Russia to achieve that, and you’re right, then I’d wager you to be the greatest military genius of all time.
Or, if you can see anything that Russia has achieved that has contributed towards that goal, then you’re a total imbecile, or even if you can’t see how Russia is further from that goal than they have been in centuries.
And they have no cards left to play and are facing economic ruin…
Sometimes it is more honourable to know when to give up, rather than playing a losing hand to utter bankruptcy and domestic collapse. Russia still has a huge country. Why not go home and develop it? You don’t lack for land and NATO is entirely non-aggressive to you. They can’t even organise to give planes to the Ukrainians in the heaviest of circumstances. They are 0 threat to your actual homeland. NATO is mostly just a way to keep the public onside with military spending.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/945252504998932491/950867741466853436/unknown.png
An imbecile I may be, but you have no idea how high or low Russian morale is, or whether "two weeks" in what will take at least 2-6 months, has "exhausted" them. The Ukrainians have a professional military and are following their orders no matter how ridiculous they might be. Staying in the Donbass instead of retreating to a more defensible position across the Dneiper strikes me as a dangerous gambit.
The Russians say the purpose is to break the Ukrainian military and force neutrality on them. Those goals seem quite reachable. I'd say they could probably install a Vichy type government over the whole country if they choose, but we'll see. In the end, the Ukes will lose at least Crimea and the Donbass anyway, and probably more, when they could have gone along with the Minsk accords and avoided the war altogether.Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP
?
While they rhapsodize over maps deluding themselves Russians only control "main roads" and trumpet individual Ukrainian victories (about 75% fake) and alleged Russian atrocities (99% fake and gay... Russia has conducted this war with truly Christ-like humaneness, American military fighting Neo-Nazi terrorists who shelter in kindergartens would have produced 5,000 civilian deaths by now instead of 500), the Donbass punishers are being progressively encircled with Mariupol fully encircled and reduced daily, the logistical hub of Izyum in particular now under Russian control, and the Lugansk forces on the verge of being completely surrounded, the ring of steel around Kiev is tightening with the main road west to Zhitomir cut off as of yesterday latest, meanwhile another armored spearhead races unopposed to encircle Nikolaev. Ukrainian air assets, AA, and armor have been progressively attritioned to very low levels, such that they no longer even bother with ridiculous claims like 30 helicopter kills and the like.
All of this will become progressively more and more obvious to the deluded and low IQ here over the next ten days. As I keep saying, the greater the delusion, the greater the resulting shock and disbelief once the inevitable comes to fruition.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @silviosilver, @Aedib, @yakushimaru
I’m not competent to judge how well or poorly the war is going for either side, but I do find it astonishing how ready some people are to believe their own side’s propaganda (this is aimed more at the Uke side). It reminds me of Serbian claims that NATO planes were dropping like flies in 1999 (and all the dopey, desperate Serbs who fell for it) and that goofball Iraqi information minister in 2003. I guess no matter how badly you’re losing, there’s no upside to admitting the truth so why not lie. (To repeat: not saying this is definitely the case for Ukraine. Maybe they’re doing just as well – or even better – than they claim. I’m just wary of believing it.)
Ironically, I would have been better served by relying on my own CMP (2020): https://www.unz.com/akarlin/cmp-2021/
Russia/USSR: 32.8
Ukraine: 4.0
Still no real chance for Ukraine with ~70% of Russian military power concentrated against it.
For comparison, in 1991:
United States: 92.2
Iraq: 2.1
So it went much more quickly and more smoothly.
***
Nonetheless, while I might have been temporarily humiliated, it is Russia whose final victory is all but assured.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123, @Twinkie
The EaEU exists to get Russia better terms for joining the EU than it could as a country. So that one is already under way.
I am not a coping liar, unlike some, so I’ll freely admit my early speculations about a very fast victory (predicated on Ukrainians disintegrating under shock and awe) were highly incorrect. In my defense, it was a delusion apparently shared by the Russian General Staff.
Ironically, I would have been better served by relying on my own CMP (2020): https://www.unz.com/akarlin/cmp-2021/
Russia/USSR: 32.8
Ukraine: 4.0
Still no real chance for Ukraine with ~70% of Russian military power concentrated against it.
For comparison, in 1991:
United States: 92.2
Iraq: 2.1
So it went much more quickly and more smoothly.
***
Nonetheless, while I might have been temporarily humiliated, it is Russia whose final victory is all but assured.
1. he says the Russian report that they have document proof Americans were operating biological weapons facilities is solid.
2. he says the Russian report that they have document proof that major Ukraine army incursion into Donbas was imminent on Feb 22 is solid.
3. he says the civilian safe passage corridor strategy is something they hashed out in Syria and that the great tactical result is it makes it trivial for uncommitted enemy soldiers to readily desert their post.
I am on the other side of the planet and I have no idea how authentic these claims are but he is presenting them at some risk to his own safety so I have very small doubt that he believes it.
Russia can grind out a War Win via their logistics & material advantage over Ukraine. What strategy will Russia use? Especially for dense urban areas, such as Kiev:
-A- Infantry led approach would incur high casualties.
-B- Extensive artillery use before the infantry goes in would devastate infrastructure.
-C- Surround & besiege without entering. This could tie up huge #'s of troops for an extended period of time.
It would appear that Putin is thinking long term. He wants to Win The Peace. All of the options (A, B, & C) are unappealing choices. The best way forward is:
-D- Negotiating a deal that ends the offensive.
Both sides need to pull back from their initial demands. Admittedly, that is an easy phrase for an outsider like myself to write. Much harder for the participants.
Zelensky's less than friendly words about about NATO (1) is a first step, though a small one, towards the Russian position. Russian needs to make a roughly similar magnitude, symbolic gesture to keep the ball rolling and build up some good will.
If forced to put numbers on it, I would guess a 50%/50% split on the negotiations working. However, I concede that may be overly optimistic on my part.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-are-all-latest-news-and-developments-ukraine-war-march-8
And how smoothly do you think OIF went in the end?
Numbers matter, but there are many intangible elements in war. A lot of banana peels. We Americans learned that the hard way more than once. It appears the Russians need to learn it more than once too. That sounds more sober than before. Here is a more interesting use of your intellect, instead of bombastic Russian neo-imperialist slogans: what plausible conditions do you think would lead to the "but" outcomes?
While they rhapsodize over maps deluding themselves Russians only control "main roads" and trumpet individual Ukrainian victories (about 75% fake) and alleged Russian atrocities (99% fake and gay... Russia has conducted this war with truly Christ-like humaneness, American military fighting Neo-Nazi terrorists who shelter in kindergartens would have produced 5,000 civilian deaths by now instead of 500), the Donbass punishers are being progressively encircled with Mariupol fully encircled and reduced daily, the logistical hub of Izyum in particular now under Russian control, and the Lugansk forces on the verge of being completely surrounded, the ring of steel around Kiev is tightening with the main road west to Zhitomir cut off as of yesterday latest, meanwhile another armored spearhead races unopposed to encircle Nikolaev. Ukrainian air assets, AA, and armor have been progressively attritioned to very low levels, such that they no longer even bother with ridiculous claims like 30 helicopter kills and the like.
All of this will become progressively more and more obvious to the deluded and low IQ here over the next ten days. As I keep saying, the greater the delusion, the greater the resulting shock and disbelief once the inevitable comes to fruition.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @silviosilver, @Aedib, @yakushimaru
While you description is mostly true, you should concede that your “Powerful takes” claims were over-optimistic. You predicted the end of the coherent Ukrainian resistance in just 1 week. Also, the Russian side suffered a considerably number of losses, and although the Ukrainians losses are way higher, the end body-count will be quite high. In addition there is a pretty low number of deserters. I don’t buy the inflated propaganda that AP place here but the Ukrainians are still fighting. I must concede that the lost “operational mobility” and are mostly entrenched in cities. Anyway, the mess will last at least two more months. Not a cheap victory (and I’m only referring to the military dimension).
The weaklings get weeded out by history, while the truly Great Men make their own fortune.Replies: @HenryBaker, @silviosilver, @Aedib
2. We had a complete and total control of the air and a whole host of advantages that the Russian military does not enjoy currently.
3. That doesn't mean Russians would not prevail ultimately, but using historical analogies that bear little resemblance to different combatants in very different conditions isn't very fruitful.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @AP, @Anatoly Karlin, @inertial
To address the points in order:
– I guess it’s forgotten now, but Iraq was quiescent for 2-3 months after the the active, “kinetic” phase of the war. But American civilian administration was bumbling around and the military maintained a “light footprint” (remember this phrase?) so US won the war but then eventually lost the peace. Will Russians do the same mistake? Possibly. But you can be sure that Russians know Ukrainians much better than Americans knew Iraqis.
– This is true, but on the other hand Russians do enjoy some advantages as compared to Americans in Iraq. For example, Russian army is fighting on its own turf.
– Last but not least, I didn’t really intend to make an exhaustive comparison of the US campaign in Iraq vs. the Russian campaign in Ukraine. I am just using that war to make a simple point: Things happen gradually and then they happen suddenly. You shouldn’t make linear extrapolations. This does not necessarily mean that the breaking point is inevitable (e.g. Russia may leave after reaching a diplomatic agreement.) But this is the way to bet.
Pretty minor compared to the world-historical significance of incorporating at least 25M more people into your empire.
The weaklings get weeded out by history, while the truly Great Men make their own fortune.
However, I will admit that if the Eastern front collapses, it's probably over for the Ukies, at least on the conventional front.
I think many readers share my curiosity about this sensitive issue.Replies: @AP
Shut up woman.
While they rhapsodize over maps deluding themselves Russians only control "main roads" and trumpet individual Ukrainian victories (about 75% fake) and alleged Russian atrocities (99% fake and gay... Russia has conducted this war with truly Christ-like humaneness, American military fighting Neo-Nazi terrorists who shelter in kindergartens would have produced 5,000 civilian deaths by now instead of 500), the Donbass punishers are being progressively encircled with Mariupol fully encircled and reduced daily, the logistical hub of Izyum in particular now under Russian control, and the Lugansk forces on the verge of being completely surrounded, the ring of steel around Kiev is tightening with the main road west to Zhitomir cut off as of yesterday latest, meanwhile another armored spearhead races unopposed to encircle Nikolaev. Ukrainian air assets, AA, and armor have been progressively attritioned to very low levels, such that they no longer even bother with ridiculous claims like 30 helicopter kills and the like.
All of this will become progressively more and more obvious to the deluded and low IQ here over the next ten days. As I keep saying, the greater the delusion, the greater the resulting shock and disbelief once the inevitable comes to fruition.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @silviosilver, @Aedib, @yakushimaru
Have you read Sailer’s “What Lessons Will Xi Draw From Putin’s War”?
Just curious, given that you seem to have high opinon of him. 😉
Recently the DrudgeReport headlines also make interesting read. It got me wondering how much I can trust the impression I got there regarding American domestic issues. 😂
The best lesson for China is to strike first and strike hard.
https://twitter.com/akarlin0/status/1498119654908309505Replies: @silviosilver, @Twinkie, @yakushimaru
Just curious, given that you seem to have high opinon of him. ;)
Recently the DrudgeReport headlines also make interesting read. It got me wondering how much I can trust the impression I got there regarding American domestic issues. 😂Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
While I do have a high opinion of Sailer, he didn’t know who Soleimani was before his assassination, geopolitics isn’t his forte and his takes on it are highly cartoonish and informed by Twitter journo/OSINT nincompoops.
The best lesson for China is to strike first and strike hard.
Strike hard
No mercy
- Kobra KaiReplies: @songbird, @Aedib
Actually, the lesson for China should've been pretty straight forward. It is to make preparations, more preparations. And if it is made to align with general development instead of a bunker attitude, then it should be settled. The other parties can do not much at all.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
The weaklings get weeded out by history, while the truly Great Men make their own fortune.Replies: @HenryBaker, @silviosilver, @Aedib
Your true disappointment may come in the form of Russia leaving Ukraine after some sort of treaty. Be careful that the ‘shock and disbelief’ you talk of won’t be your own! You’re very invested in both the annexation, and ultimate Russian victory points of view. I think you’re leaving too many uncertainties out of your analysis here- that’s probably the nationalism. Your nationalist biases were imo quite clear in your idea that Ukraine (as a ‘fake state’) would not resist much and roll over quickly, which is more or less the same sentiment as held by colonizing European powers during the decolonization wars.
However, I will admit that if the Eastern front collapses, it’s probably over for the Ukies, at least on the conventional front.
https://i.imgur.com/Ovy8Ab6.pngReplies: @Seraphim, @Wielgus
A single phrase explains the fanatical ‘international support’ for the ‘sovereignty and territorial integrity’ of ‘Ukraine’, the abject worship of the clown Zelenski by the chorus of clowns of the “UK Parliament” under the direction of the clown in chief Blojo: ”the most important of groups in Ukraine: the Jews”.
If Putin and his generals were reading these comments he would have won the war within 24 hours of it starting, I am sure.
So many arm-chair generals so willing to offer advice!
Blinken Green Lights —
Russia launched a small number of missile strikes on military objects before going up against a 95 IQ military, and yet that regardless, its rate of advance has been comparable. (In retrospect, there certainly wasn't near enough shock and awe at the beginning, naive and humane Russians underestimated the degree to which Ukrainians had been brainwashed into their Banderist cult).Replies: @Veteran of the Memic Wars, @AP, @Twinkie
“Naive” and “Russians” never really sound good together on the lips, IMO. I think Russia calculated that they were willing to lose more of their own soldiers to minimize the “shock and awe” they have to lay down to pacify Ukraine (thus generating the minimum of hatred necessary among the Ukrainian people). They may have figured that if they give logic, Russian messaging (they may not be winning the internet war, but I think they’re probably working the bullhorns and the radios pretty hard at the tactical level), Ukrainian word of mouth time to work, and USkraine brainwashing time to wear off, they’ll be doing what they can to minimize lemming-like behavior from the population. That kind of thing tends to slow down an advance (making it, I dunno, almost “police action”-like, eh?).
But I know a lot less about Russia than you do so…
And Russia is behind an Iron Curtain once again. Do you like that?
What’s crazy is how certain everyone is. I was discussing the war with a goofy 18 year old the other day, and he was just regurgitating western mass propaganda narrative as gospel with zero critical thinking. And he’s a pretty smart kid, even if he is a shitlib. He was flabbergasted when I told him Moscow has a population of like 17-20 million people, he was like, “no, Moscow is like 3 or 4 million” and I said “bullshit, it’s like 17m” with absolute certainty, because I’d just looked it up recently. I hope I punctured his bubble a bit; maybe he’ll go back and review his other “facts.”
How are these people so certain? I keep asking them that. I guess these kids are too young to know how much western media lies? But what excuse do the people here have (Russia shills included)? They can’t all be 18.
I have done a fair amount of reading indie sources, reading between the lines, and sifting facts and thinking critically, and I have my speculative analysis, but it isn’t delivered with certainty, overall. Then again, the western narrative is so stupid that I’m pretty certain it’s wrong on the important facts (how the war is going).
Think I recall hearing that sanctions on Rhodesia were ineffective, at least on the civilian end of it, and that they were able to develop their own packaging plants for basic consumer goods, like breakfast cereal, which seems pretty remarkable, though I suppose that was with tacit support from South Africa and maybe the Portuguese colonies, which however were not as advanced as China is today.
Perhaps, Russia should invade Africa for good measure.
The Russians have taken the coastline, disabled the Ukrainian air force and navy, nearly surrounded the Ukrainian military in the Donbass, surrounded the capital as well as every large population area except Lviv. They’ve secured supply lines for all their troops. They are advancing on every front.
An imbecile I may be, but you have no idea how high or low Russian morale is, or whether “two weeks” in what will take at least 2-6 months, has “exhausted” them. The Ukrainians have a professional military and are following their orders no matter how ridiculous they might be. Staying in the Donbass instead of retreating to a more defensible position across the Dneiper strikes me as a dangerous gambit.
The Russians say the purpose is to break the Ukrainian military and force neutrality on them. Those goals seem quite reachable. I’d say they could probably install a Vichy type government over the whole country if they choose, but we’ll see. In the end, the Ukes will lose at least Crimea and the Donbass anyway, and probably more, when they could have gone along with the Minsk accords and avoided the war altogether.
Where do you get your "information?"Replies: @Rich, @Wokechoke
The weaklings get weeded out by history, while the truly Great Men make their own fortune.Replies: @HenryBaker, @silviosilver, @Aedib
Quite the transformation (into… I know not what).
The best lesson for China is to strike first and strike hard.
https://twitter.com/akarlin0/status/1498119654908309505Replies: @silviosilver, @Twinkie, @yakushimaru
Strike first
Strike hard
No mercy
– Kobra Kai
Pretty tragic, when you put it in its local context of what happened to California. Yeah, as if that would have happened in LA, in 1984! Equivalent of Jussie Smollet's accusation. And, of course, in the remake, Daniel was replaced with a black. But, then again, maybe there was a hidden message in him being Italian. LOL.Replies: @silviosilver, @LondonBob
If I were China, I would not try a repeat of Japan in the Second World War.
At least, not in the conventional sense. The Japanese did try to increase our problems with blacks, probably not to any great strategic effect. But in the current year, would be incredibly easy and effective for China to do. By Vietnam, we were already keeping draftees garrisoned in the US, to avoid problems with blacks, and America was a lot saner and more functional back then.
Strike hard
No mercy
- Kobra KaiReplies: @songbird, @Aedib
Unfortunate thing about the movie Karate Kid is that beyond the lessons of hard work from humble beginnings, they do play up the racism angle. (One scene where rednecks harass Miyagi at the beach.)
Pretty tragic, when you put it in its local context of what happened to California. Yeah, as if that would have happened in LA, in 1984! Equivalent of Jussie Smollet’s accusation. And, of course, in the remake, Daniel was replaced with a black. But, then again, maybe there was a hidden message in him being Italian. LOL.
An imbecile I may be, but you have no idea how high or low Russian morale is, or whether "two weeks" in what will take at least 2-6 months, has "exhausted" them. The Ukrainians have a professional military and are following their orders no matter how ridiculous they might be. Staying in the Donbass instead of retreating to a more defensible position across the Dneiper strikes me as a dangerous gambit.
The Russians say the purpose is to break the Ukrainian military and force neutrality on them. Those goals seem quite reachable. I'd say they could probably install a Vichy type government over the whole country if they choose, but we'll see. In the end, the Ukes will lose at least Crimea and the Donbass anyway, and probably more, when they could have gone along with the Minsk accords and avoided the war altogether.Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP
It’s a Cauldron.
An imbecile I may be, but you have no idea how high or low Russian morale is, or whether "two weeks" in what will take at least 2-6 months, has "exhausted" them. The Ukrainians have a professional military and are following their orders no matter how ridiculous they might be. Staying in the Donbass instead of retreating to a more defensible position across the Dneiper strikes me as a dangerous gambit.
The Russians say the purpose is to break the Ukrainian military and force neutrality on them. Those goals seem quite reachable. I'd say they could probably install a Vichy type government over the whole country if they choose, but we'll see. In the end, the Ukes will lose at least Crimea and the Donbass anyway, and probably more, when they could have gone along with the Minsk accords and avoided the war altogether.Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP
Not yet. They haven’t taken Odessa or Mykolaiv.
Air force still fights. Tiny Navy is gone.
Some of them.
Nonsense. Groceries still getting in. People still coming and going (a bunch of foreign volunteers just arrived). Russians to the NW and NE.
Odessa not surrounded. No Russian troops even close to Dnipro (Ukraine’s fourth largest city, population 980,000).
Where do you get your “information?”
Russia launched a small number of missile strikes on military objects before going up against a 95 IQ military, and yet that regardless, its rate of advance has been comparable. (In retrospect, there certainly wasn't near enough shock and awe at the beginning, naive and humane Russians underestimated the degree to which Ukrainians had been brainwashed into their Banderist cult).Replies: @Veteran of the Memic Wars, @AP, @Twinkie
It was more like a couple of days of heavy bombing.
Missile strikes began March 19th. Army rolled in March 22nd.
My March 27th, the Americans had established control over Nasiriyah (population 500,000 at the time). That’s after only 8 days.
After 13 days, the largest city the Russians control is Kherson (population 300,000).
American + Brits lost only 200 troops during the entire Iraq invasion.
Russians already have lost at least 1,000 by Russian estimates (they estimated 500 a few days ago), most likely 2,000 or so.
So far, according to UN estimates, Russians have killed about 500 Ukrainian civilians yesterday.
Entire Iraq invasion had 3,200 to 7,000 civilian deaths so Russia is on track to kill as many Ukrainian civilians as the low estimate of Iraqi civilian deaths.
So Russians are killing about as many civilians in Ukraine as Americans did in Iraq, but are losing an order of magnitude more soldiers while gaining population centers more slowly. And they are managing to do this not on another continent but right next door to their homeland. What a senseless debacle.
If we knew answers to these questions a lot about Ukraine's near future would become clear.Replies: @Seraphim, @Reactive Reaction
They all fled the country. The rats fleeing the sinking ship.
Where do you get your "information?"Replies: @Rich, @Wokechoke
Your information is old, and clouded by propaganda except about Dnipro. You are certainly entitled to wishful thinking. I don’t have a side in this fight, so I’m trying to look at the war as clear-eyed as possible. As we all know, “truth is the first casualty of war”.
Is Ukraine's air force gone? No. US DOD claims most of it is still operable and Russia claims the first and second class pilots have been killed but admits that it is still capable of single attempts to sorties by combat aircraft.
Is Kiev surrounded? No. The southern approach is still free. The city is still getting resupplied. It may get surrounded in another couple of days, but it certainly is not surrounded now.Replies: @Rich
Where do you get your "information?"Replies: @Rich, @Wokechoke
I’ve typed in names of various towns and hamlets around the motorway/freeway/interstate/autobahn junctions feeding into Kiev. The Ukrianians boast about tanks they’ve knocked out in various key areas at these highway junctions.
Tap in a village after scanning the Google Map, cross reference that with Ukraine claims of knocked out Russian AFV in Google word search. Boryspil Brovary Buzova all towns on the outer ring road into Kiev all places where the Russians are fighting Ukrainian checkpoints and garrisons.
Kiev is surrounded and the artillery is firing. There’s a route out to the south but all those highways are targets if there’s incoming traffic. Well Within range of howitzer, missile and direct fire. Pretty stupid of the mercs to arrive into the drum fire of artillery. I understand Poltava has been bypassed according to Jane’s and the forward elements of column are on the Dneiper near those bridging points.
::::::::::::
Overall, this was involves two things:
1. Russia is losing large numbers of men and equipment. These are not really getting resupplied (about 75% of Russia's usable military is already in Ukraine; we see junk being sent from the Far East, Russia is scraping the bottom of the barrel).
2. Ukraine is also losing men and equipment but at a lower rate after the first couple days, and Ukraine is getting largescale resupplies of both (reserves and territorial defenses and volunteers from abroad keep coming, as do arms shipments of first class weapons)
3. Russia continues to advance steadily but slowly.
I do not know how this war will end, but it seems very likely that Russia will continue to slowly advance while bleeding men and equipment. Eventually it will reach a point when it can no longer advance due to the losses in men and equipment. The question is how far will Russia get before its losses prevent further advance.
Will Russia finally surround Kiev? Likely (but do they have enough to storm the well armed city of 3 million - doubtful). Take Kharkiv? Likely. The city is only 40 km from the border and after 2 weeks and heavy losses Russia has finally managed to just surround it. I'm not sure how long it can hold out. Take Zaporizhia and then Dnipro? Maybe. Odessa too? Maybe, but that's another large well-armed city. I don't pretend to know how much Russia will grab but I know it will be harder and take longer than Russian fanboys think it will. Russia is now making concessions in its peace offerings so it recognizes that things aren't going as well for it as had been expected at the beginning.
Overall, I do expect that Russia will take a lot more than it has now, but I doubt it will be able to take the entire country. And then there will be insurgency. More bleeding.Replies: @Wokechoke
Missile strikes began March 19th. Army rolled in March 22nd.
My March 27th, the Americans had established control over Nasiriyah (population 500,000 at the time). That's after only 8 days.
After 13 days, the largest city the Russians control is Kherson (population 300,000).
American + Brits lost only 200 troops during the entire Iraq invasion.
Russians already have lost at least 1,000 by Russian estimates (they estimated 500 a few days ago), most likely 2,000 or so. So far, according to UN estimates, Russians have killed about 500 Ukrainian civilians yesterday.
Entire Iraq invasion had 3,200 to 7,000 civilian deaths so Russia is on track to kill as many Ukrainian civilians as the low estimate of Iraqi civilian deaths.
So Russians are killing about as many civilians in Ukraine as Americans did in Iraq, but are losing an order of magnitude more soldiers while gaining population centers more slowly. And they are managing to do this not on another continent but right next door to their homeland. What a senseless debacle.Replies: @Wokechoke
The Ukrainians are not Arabs.
This Jane’s map, full viewing of sources and verification requires an account. But the map astonishingly suggests a column of Russians has reached the Dneiper by bypassing Poltava. Not like anything can get over those bridges without missiles and bombs landing on them at either side of the bridges. The Dneiper is a fearsome choke point all of its own, would like to see shots of the wrecked stuff that tried to cross.
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/ukraine-crisis
The weaklings get weeded out by history, while the truly Great Men make their own fortune.Replies: @HenryBaker, @silviosilver, @Aedib
It would be interesting to read your description of the economic conditions in Russia after that USA launched all its “economic nuclear ICBMs”. They launched their entire arsenal. What is happening and what do you expect to happen?
I think many readers share my curiosity about this sensitive issue.
It just became a lot harder to buy a car or some other Western product but if you don’t happen to be in need of one at the moment this isn’t a problem. Restaurants etc. still function, rubles are worth less but so what? Russian credit cards still work in Russia. Overall life hasn’t changed. I expect it would take weeks if not months for the bank-related and other problems to filter down and result in problems for regular people.
A Russian friend in the USA was screwed though: had inherited an apartment in a large Russian city, hasn’t had time to sell it when the war started. Would have gotten a couple $100k for it but now the ruble became worthless and money can’t be taken out of the country.Replies: @silviosilver, @mal
Ironically, I would have been better served by relying on my own CMP (2020): https://www.unz.com/akarlin/cmp-2021/
Russia/USSR: 32.8
Ukraine: 4.0
Still no real chance for Ukraine with ~70% of Russian military power concentrated against it.
For comparison, in 1991:
United States: 92.2
Iraq: 2.1
So it went much more quickly and more smoothly.
***
Nonetheless, while I might have been temporarily humiliated, it is Russia whose final victory is all but assured.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123, @Twinkie
Have you seen Gonzo Lira’s report in the Unz newslinks section today? He lives in Khirkov but only has second hand sources as he is Chilean and does not speak or read Russian or Ukrainian.
1. he says the Russian report that they have document proof Americans were operating biological weapons facilities is solid.
2. he says the Russian report that they have document proof that major Ukraine army incursion into Donbas was imminent on Feb 22 is solid.
3. he says the civilian safe passage corridor strategy is something they hashed out in Syria and that the great tactical result is it makes it trivial for uncommitted enemy soldiers to readily desert their post.
I am on the other side of the planet and I have no idea how authentic these claims are but he is presenting them at some risk to his own safety so I have very small doubt that he believes it.
Strike hard
No mercy
- Kobra KaiReplies: @songbird, @Aedib
Russians suffered losses due to the order of behaving with mercy. That was an error. May be, from a strict military point of view, they should have conducted the operation on “Berserker mode” from the start. In fact they are still not operating in such a mode.
Denninger thinks Russia has already won!
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245363
Speaking of shock and disbelief, the international faith in Washington which was already in decline seems in free fall now. Things can rot on the inside for a long time before it’s apparent on the outside and the tree dies quickly.
Regardless of the final calculus in Ukraine the world is feeling a lot more multi-polar these days. Even Europe seems intent to chart it’s own course to a greater extent.
I don't in general read Ron's pieces because they are so goofy, but that sounds about right and very entertaining - I will have to check that out. .
Wow, well that's a fascinating idea.
There are so many ways to wage war - some of the most subtle can be the most successful.
For the "Slave empire" to actually take over the West from within rather than stupidly confronting it's power - is such subtlety even possible in our blunt, stupid, and crass age?
It would be like Christianity taking over the Roman Empire from within - precisely through a process of refusing to fight it.
Are Slavs approaching their moment in history when they can become a "world historical" people - the moment when they push the engine of history forward?
All peoples more or less get this moment.
Probably not quite yet - but maybe soon. The strength and fervor of the Ukrainian resistance is something deeply interesting and suggestive. Russia in it's current iteration seems played out - only more of the old.
I don't know...
The times are becoming interesting.Replies: @Barbarossa, @Justvisiting
Well done sir…Well done.
The truly great things in history don't get accomplished through sheer violence, but quietly.
Alexander the Greats conquests dissolved a generation or two after his death, the Athenian Empire barely lasted a generation or so...
The Roman Empire only lasted as long as it did because it provided a long term moral vision, peace and security, like the American Empire (although both in the end were evil).
Christianity, the "loser" philosophy, lasted two thousand years and is still with us, and ruled the fates of kingdoms...
Unprincipled violence makes a splash in the short term but never has long term staying power...
But they never understand this, the short sighted men of power...
I don't know how this Russian adventure will end, but it will not end in long term glory as Karlin expects.Replies: @Wokechoke
I think many readers share my curiosity about this sensitive issue.Replies: @AP
According to relatives in Moscow there is no noticeable difference so far.
It just became a lot harder to buy a car or some other Western product but if you don’t happen to be in need of one at the moment this isn’t a problem. Restaurants etc. still function, rubles are worth less but so what? Russian credit cards still work in Russia. Overall life hasn’t changed. I expect it would take weeks if not months for the bank-related and other problems to filter down and result in problems for regular people.
A Russian friend in the USA was screwed though: had inherited an apartment in a large Russian city, hasn’t had time to sell it when the war started. Would have gotten a couple \$100k for it but now the ruble became worthless and money can’t be taken out of the country.
My biggest concern (and so is my family's) is the "O-ring economy". Basically little things like spare parts and key ingredients. A lot of this is made in China and won't be a problem, true, but some key items may be very hard to get. This is a much bigger deal than it seems at first glance because you can have 99.999% of machinery built and ready to go, but without a key microchip it will be completely useless.
Again, this is not the end of the world, but it will take a couple of years for Russia to source those components which is why I see a serious recession risk, beyond silly GDP numbers. Disruptions will be temporary, but severe.
And on my end in the Gulf Coast, European industry is done for. We used to receive ships from Europe for resale in the US to augment our own production. Not anymore. Energy costs are so high, Europe is struggling to stay competitive. They are hedged for now, but can't throttle production on demand, and when the hedges end... I just tell Europeans to move to the Gulf Coast permanently - we have energy to run. And i think that's what's going to happen - EU will de-industrialize and move production to the US. Making America Great Again.
Not saying US industry doesn't have its own problems, but compared to EU, we are cruising.
Pretty tragic, when you put it in its local context of what happened to California. Yeah, as if that would have happened in LA, in 1984! Equivalent of Jussie Smollet's accusation. And, of course, in the remake, Daniel was replaced with a black. But, then again, maybe there was a hidden message in him being Italian. LOL.Replies: @silviosilver, @LondonBob
Karate Kid could well be my favorite ever movie. I’ve lost count of how times I’ve seen it. The bottles on the truck scene, I only noticed the gratuitous anti-racism message aspect of it as an adult. Also, virtually all the bad guys are a blond.
But that’s small potatoes compared to the crap Hollywood pulls in other movies. My main complaint about Karate Kid is the plot near the beginning. Daniel’s cool and fun, the sort of guy who’d make friends easily. Indeed, he gets invited to a beach party right away. And when he’s there he takes part in the soccer game (apparently doing well), he not only accepts the challenge to approach the babe but wins her over, and then he stands up for her when her ex is giving her a hard time.
So he loses a fight with Mr Karate Champ, big deal. At least he was man enough to fight (not only threw a punch, but connected). No shame in that. Yet somehow, everyone there immediately starts treating him as some massive loser whom it’d be insulting to be to associated with. That doesn’t even begin to make sense, not even by high school logic.
I never watched the remake with the black kid. But I watched five or six episodes into the Kobra Kai tv series, which was better than I expected it to be. I should actually finish watching that.
Movie had one of my favorite, optimistic theme songs of any movie from the '80s. Joe Esposito - You're The Best Around. (It's right up there with some of the Rocky songs, IMO). Never saw the show, but I know several people who like it.
____
Wonder where Zelenksy will set up shop, assuming he hasn't already. My money is on the UK.Replies: @silviosilver
https://twitter.com/akarlin0/status/1501105907316449282?s=20&t=nqIVd17FURHFtFC4vYBJWA
It just became a lot harder to buy a car or some other Western product but if you don’t happen to be in need of one at the moment this isn’t a problem. Restaurants etc. still function, rubles are worth less but so what? Russian credit cards still work in Russia. Overall life hasn’t changed. I expect it would take weeks if not months for the bank-related and other problems to filter down and result in problems for regular people.
A Russian friend in the USA was screwed though: had inherited an apartment in a large Russian city, hasn’t had time to sell it when the war started. Would have gotten a couple $100k for it but now the ruble became worthless and money can’t be taken out of the country.Replies: @silviosilver, @mal
Re utu’s ethnicity, from the other open thread.
Ok, I see where you’re coming from, but I think I’d need better evidence than that to feel so confident, given the enormous disparity in base rates (there are way more Poles and Czechs than Silesians).
It just became a lot harder to buy a car or some other Western product but if you don’t happen to be in need of one at the moment this isn’t a problem. Restaurants etc. still function, rubles are worth less but so what? Russian credit cards still work in Russia. Overall life hasn’t changed. I expect it would take weeks if not months for the bank-related and other problems to filter down and result in problems for regular people.
A Russian friend in the USA was screwed though: had inherited an apartment in a large Russian city, hasn’t had time to sell it when the war started. Would have gotten a couple $100k for it but now the ruble became worthless and money can’t be taken out of the country.Replies: @silviosilver, @mal
I’m not worried about that. My family in Russia got savings accounts that pay 20% (short term though) and with MIR-UnionPay deal I don’t think there will be major banking problems in Russia. Nabiullina is top class. She saved Russia before, she will do it again.
My biggest concern (and so is my family’s) is the “O-ring economy”. Basically little things like spare parts and key ingredients. A lot of this is made in China and won’t be a problem, true, but some key items may be very hard to get. This is a much bigger deal than it seems at first glance because you can have 99.999% of machinery built and ready to go, but without a key microchip it will be completely useless.
Again, this is not the end of the world, but it will take a couple of years for Russia to source those components which is why I see a serious recession risk, beyond silly GDP numbers. Disruptions will be temporary, but severe.
And on my end in the Gulf Coast, European industry is done for. We used to receive ships from Europe for resale in the US to augment our own production. Not anymore. Energy costs are so high, Europe is struggling to stay competitive. They are hedged for now, but can’t throttle production on demand, and when the hedges end… I just tell Europeans to move to the Gulf Coast permanently – we have energy to run. And i think that’s what’s going to happen – EU will de-industrialize and move production to the US. Making America Great Again.
Not saying US industry doesn’t have its own problems, but compared to EU, we are cruising.
Good point about the fight.
Movie had one of my favorite, optimistic theme songs of any movie from the ’80s. Joe Esposito – You’re The Best Around. (It’s right up there with some of the Rocky songs, IMO). Never saw the show, but I know several people who like it.
____
Wonder where Zelenksy will set up shop, assuming he hasn’t already. My money is on the UK.
Probably the two famous people/characters I've most often been told I look like are Daniel LaRusso (ie the Karate Kid) and Danny Zuko (Travolta in Grease). I can see the likeness with Daniel, but I don't think I look like Travolta at all, not even in that movie. I think it's just the slick greasy hair I've been known to sport, combined with my penchant for wearing black leather jackets that forms the association for people. Oh and Fonzie from Happy Days too, but again it's more the jacket than actually looking like him.Replies: @songbird
Have the Russian taken Odessa or Mikolaiv yet? No, they haven’t. So the Russians haven’t taken the coast.
Is Ukraine’s air force gone? No. US DOD claims most of it is still operable and Russia claims the first and second class pilots have been killed but admits that it is still capable of single attempts to sorties by combat aircraft.
Is Kiev surrounded? No. The southern approach is still free. The city is still getting resupplied. It may get surrounded in another couple of days, but it certainly is not surrounded now.
Ironically, I would have been better served by relying on my own CMP (2020): https://www.unz.com/akarlin/cmp-2021/
Russia/USSR: 32.8
Ukraine: 4.0
Still no real chance for Ukraine with ~70% of Russian military power concentrated against it.
For comparison, in 1991:
United States: 92.2
Iraq: 2.1
So it went much more quickly and more smoothly.
***
Nonetheless, while I might have been temporarily humiliated, it is Russia whose final victory is all but assured.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123, @Twinkie
I largely concur.
Russia can grind out a War Win via their logistics & material advantage over Ukraine. What strategy will Russia use? Especially for dense urban areas, such as Kiev:
-A- Infantry led approach would incur high casualties.
-B- Extensive artillery use before the infantry goes in would devastate infrastructure.
-C- Surround & besiege without entering. This could tie up huge #’s of troops for an extended period of time.
It would appear that Putin is thinking long term. He wants to Win The Peace. All of the options (A, B, & C) are unappealing choices. The best way forward is:
-D- Negotiating a deal that ends the offensive.
Both sides need to pull back from their initial demands. Admittedly, that is an easy phrase for an outsider like myself to write. Much harder for the participants.
Zelensky’s less than friendly words about about NATO (1) is a first step, though a small one, towards the Russian position. Russian needs to make a roughly similar magnitude, symbolic gesture to keep the ball rolling and build up some good will.
If forced to put numbers on it, I would guess a 50%/50% split on the negotiations working. However, I concede that may be overly optimistic on my part.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-are-all-latest-news-and-developments-ukraine-war-march-8
Not in every place where Russian vehicles have been destroyed have the Russians maintained a permanent presence. At the moment the Russians have stable forces to the NW, W and E but not to the south. The Russian forces around the city are still about 20 km or more away, and there is a large area to the south that remains open. A lot of Kiev is still quiet. The city is getting resupplied, with food weapons and volunteers.
The point is that there is still a large clear area to the south; Kiev isn’t bottled up yet.
::::::::::::
Overall, this was involves two things:
1. Russia is losing large numbers of men and equipment. These are not really getting resupplied (about 75% of Russia’s usable military is already in Ukraine; we see junk being sent from the Far East, Russia is scraping the bottom of the barrel).
2. Ukraine is also losing men and equipment but at a lower rate after the first couple days, and Ukraine is getting largescale resupplies of both (reserves and territorial defenses and volunteers from abroad keep coming, as do arms shipments of first class weapons)
3. Russia continues to advance steadily but slowly.
I do not know how this war will end, but it seems very likely that Russia will continue to slowly advance while bleeding men and equipment. Eventually it will reach a point when it can no longer advance due to the losses in men and equipment. The question is how far will Russia get before its losses prevent further advance.
Will Russia finally surround Kiev? Likely (but do they have enough to storm the well armed city of 3 million – doubtful). Take Kharkiv? Likely. The city is only 40 km from the border and after 2 weeks and heavy losses Russia has finally managed to just surround it. I’m not sure how long it can hold out. Take Zaporizhia and then Dnipro? Maybe. Odessa too? Maybe, but that’s another large well-armed city. I don’t pretend to know how much Russia will grab but I know it will be harder and take longer than Russian fanboys think it will. Russia is now making concessions in its peace offerings so it recognizes that things aren’t going as well for it as had been expected at the beginning.
Overall, I do expect that Russia will take a lot more than it has now, but I doubt it will be able to take the entire country. And then there will be insurgency. More bleeding.
Inadvertently the Ukrainian boasts about knocking out tanks here and there indicates the actual positions of the Russian advances. It’s easy enough to track live Russian positions by looking at specific hamlets Ukrainians tweet from and cross checking that on the Google map. Janes also have a map which is proprietary. But that shows Kremenchuk bridge in the Center of Ukraine under attack by the land units of the Russians. It’s hard to believe but it’s also possible given their reckless abandon in comparison to a casualty conscious British or American Army.Replies: @AP
He knows enough about Poles, Czechs and Slovaks (not just historical facts, but he captures their spirit) that he must be a Slav from this region.; and he seems less critical of Poles than of the others. He also shows a sympathy for Germans that is rare among members of all three nations. So he must be a Silesian (the only pro-German Slavic group in that area), or if not that – a southern Pole with a German grandparent.
When I first heard the Russian claims a few days ago that America had been funding biowarfare labs in Ukraine, I was pretty skeptical. It seemed like typical “black propaganda” produced in wartime and forged documents in a foreign language aren’t easy to check.
But as some of you have probably heard, Victoria Nuland seems to have admitted it’s all true in her Congressional testimony. Glenn Greenwald had an excellent column this morning and Tucker Carlson just did a great segment:
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/victoria-nuland-ukraine-has-biological
I’d say it was an extremely reckless and foolish thing for the American government to have funded the creation of bioweapons facilities controlled by an extremely hostile country bordering Russia.
And it seems to me that countries which do some extremely reckless and foolish things are much more likely to have done other extremely reckless and foolish things in the past, perhaps including things that resulted in the deaths of around a million Americans over the last couple of years:
https://www.unz.com/page/covid-biowarfare-articles/
Russia launched a small number of missile strikes on military objects before going up against a 95 IQ military, and yet that regardless, its rate of advance has been comparable. (In retrospect, there certainly wasn't near enough shock and awe at the beginning, naive and humane Russians underestimated the degree to which Ukrainians had been brainwashed into their Banderist cult).Replies: @Veteran of the Memic Wars, @AP, @Twinkie
Maybe. But what remained of Iraq’s air defense system was eliminated in the first week (not that there was much left after the first Gulf War) and the Iraqi command structure pretty much evaporated overnight (partly because the Iraqis weren’t planning to fight conventionally in the second go, having watched our plight in Somalia compared to their own utter destruction in Desert Storm).
In any case, you know what’s not comparable? The respective casualty rates.
That sounds suspiciously like a back-handed acknowledgement of the grit and courage of the Ukrainians. Morale seems to matter after all, no? 😉
Are you selling the rest of us something or are you trying to convince yourself?
Mr. Karlin, I thought you were an open-eyed, cold-calculating realist. This kind of a sloganeering is more Baghdad Bob than a sober analyst. You disappoint me.
Movie had one of my favorite, optimistic theme songs of any movie from the '80s. Joe Esposito - You're The Best Around. (It's right up there with some of the Rocky songs, IMO). Never saw the show, but I know several people who like it.
____
Wonder where Zelenksy will set up shop, assuming he hasn't already. My money is on the UK.Replies: @silviosilver
I was actually going to mention that kickass song, but I forgot. It’s been a favorite workout song of mine (and just generally too) for years now. There’s another song that sounds kickass, just as the Kobra Kai approach the beach on their motorbikes near the start, but only the part that’s played in the movie sounds any good; the song as a whole (“Ride” – by Matches) is crap. What do you mean by “never saw the show”?
Probably the two famous people/characters I’ve most often been told I look like are Daniel LaRusso (ie the Karate Kid) and Danny Zuko (Travolta in Grease). I can see the likeness with Daniel, but I don’t think I look like Travolta at all, not even in that movie. I think it’s just the slick greasy hair I’ve been known to sport, combined with my penchant for wearing black leather jackets that forms the association for people. Oh and Fonzie from Happy Days too, but again it’s more the jacket than actually looking like him.
Another optimistic '80s movie song I like is "Never Say Die" by King Cobra for the movie Iron Eagle, which probably should be considered like Delta Force, an Israeli propaganda film intended to make young American's aggressive toward Arabs.
When I was around 8 or 9, I remember several people telling me I looked like JFK, which I find unsettling, as I think he was a weird-looking guy, and I don't understand how I could have looked like him as a boy. Later, in my teens, I think I was told I look like the drummer from U2, which I can't really see either. Fact is, I don't think I have a double anywhere in the world, unless I was secretly cloned.Replies: @silviosilver
Regardless of the final calculus in Ukraine the world is feeling a lot more multi-polar these days. Even Europe seems intent to chart it's own course to a greater extent.Replies: @iffen
It may turn out that we will always owe a debt to Ukrainians if this puts us on a saner geopolitical path and compels us to hang up our world policeman’s badge.
Your reasoning is sound enough, but assigning a 90% subjective probability to it? You’re a braver man than I.
I don’t do predictions, because only fools, crazies, or people selling something offer up predictions. The fact is no one can predict the future (one might get lucky once or twice), and everyone is just guessing. Some guesses are more educated than others, but they are still speculations.
That goes double for any kind of combat, where there are opposing wills. Recently another commenter asked for my opinion of what would happen in a particular MMA fight, and I answered similarly. There are just too many unpredictable variables in war, as in a person-to-person fight. In the latter, there is a saying, “So-and-so is totally going to win this fight… unless he slips on a banana peel or something.” Well, the world is full of banana peels. So I only offered up what I saw as strengths and weaknesses of each fighter.
I don’t have anything original to add about the current Russo-Ukrainian conflict, but I will just make a few personal comments and observations:
1. I was surprised that the Russian air force has not achieved a total control of the air and has not provided a completely dominant overwatch and close air support. I read a number of different theories as to why, but the most plausible explanations (at least to me) seem to be that a) Russian air crews are not well-trained, certainly not on par with the best of Western air forces and are not proficient in mounting high-complexity joint air operations with a lot of aircraft and coordinating ground elements and b) the Russians don’t appear to have a large stockpile of precision-guided munitions, with which to launch highly precise attacks on the ground. In absence of those, launching night attacks (to avoid MANPADs) with dumb bombs is bound to be inaccurate and ineffective – and much more likely incur collateral damage.
2. I was also surprised with how easily some Russian armored vehicle columns were ambushed by the Ukrainians in the early part of the war. As a number of observers pointed out, Russian ground forces – here and there – seemed not to operate well as combined arms teams, with armor, infantry, and artillery mutually supporting and covering for each other in advances. That’s something one expects of poorly-trained and -motivated conscripts. Given the increasing professionalization of the Russian army in the past decade, I expected a much greater facility in combined arms operations especially at the small scale, tactical level.
3. As well, I found the Ukrainian resistance to be unexpectedly fierce so far. I generally have a pretty dim view of the training level, morale, and effectiveness of armed forces personnel below the first-tier military nations, so I thought the Ukrainians would crumble rather quickly. I think their unexpectedly better resistance forced a re-evaluation and re-thinking on the part of the Western nations, that likely would have written off the conquest of Ukraine, albeit with a lot of verbal furor, denunciations, and recriminations. I certainly did not expect the former comedian president of Ukraine to be so inspirational to his countrymen.
4. All this said, I think the conventional war is still Russia’s to lose. The fact remains that there is a huge manpower and materiel disparity between the two forces in Russia’s favor. I would think a more salient question wouldn’t be so much about whether Russia will or will not win, but how much losses and suffering Russia is willing to incur and to inflict in order to achieve the said victory. For that matter, while Ukrainian morale seems to holding up well so far, formal resistance could collapse quickly if the Ukrainian national command authority were to be captured or killed. These are intangibles that cannot be measured or predicted.
5. Of course, that then begs the question: even if Russia were to win (which is not in any way guaranteed), what will a Russian occupation look like? Israeli military theorist Martin van Creveld once wrote that, in a post-modern world, when the strong fights the weak in a long war, the strong loses. Having failed to topple Ukraine in a lightning attack, Russia will have to use much more destructive means to achieve victory, which will only embitter the population it was supposed to “liberate,” even setting aside the enormous international opprobrium. Although hardly assured one way or another, the prospect of a Russian victory being Pyrrhic and the conquest of Ukraine being a poisoned pill cannot be dismissed easily.
6. Yet another question, which I am not in any way qualified answer, is the issue of domestic consensus in Russia. Putin is an undisputed authoritarian leader, but he is not a God-Emperor. Surely he is to a varying degree sensitive to the Russian “street” opinion and domestic legitimacy. As with the CCP in China, I think Putin derives much of that domestic legitimacy from the fact that his rule has coincided with the re-rise of Russia as a world player, not to forget the rise in living standards. I cannot even begin to predict how and to what extent Russia’s economy and standard of living will be affected by this war and how long the current domestic consensus (53% or something close to it supporting the war) would persist in the face of varying scenarios of negative outcomes (one shouldn’t forget the effect of the Afghan War on the Soviet Union, which turned out to be far more sensitive to losses of its young men than the supposedly more brittle American domestic morale in Vietnam).
I guess this is a rather longwinded version of “Things turned out differently than I thought, and I have no clue what’s going to happen next.” 😉
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSftft2sKS6IQCxFQKzks5e9_PxeIFbMxbQWQ&usqp.jpg
https://youtu.be/z0mNYcSqQnsReplies: @Blinky Bill
I came across a very true comment - Putin managed to do what Ukrainian nationalists had failed to do in 30 years - convince even Eastern Ukrainians that Bandera was correct about the Russians.Replies: @sudden death, @utu, @Anatoly Karlin, @Pharmakon, @Twinkie
Ironically, I would have been better served by relying on my own CMP (2020): https://www.unz.com/akarlin/cmp-2021/
Russia/USSR: 32.8
Ukraine: 4.0
Still no real chance for Ukraine with ~70% of Russian military power concentrated against it.
For comparison, in 1991:
United States: 92.2
Iraq: 2.1
So it went much more quickly and more smoothly.
***
Nonetheless, while I might have been temporarily humiliated, it is Russia whose final victory is all but assured.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123, @Twinkie
What were the comparative numbers in 2003 (or 2011)?
And how smoothly do you think OIF went in the end?
Numbers matter, but there are many intangible elements in war. A lot of banana peels. We Americans learned that the hard way more than once. It appears the Russians need to learn it more than once too.
That sounds more sober than before. Here is a more interesting use of your intellect, instead of bombastic Russian neo-imperialist slogans: what plausible conditions do you think would lead to the “but” outcomes?
The fact that the US DoD has declined to accept the donation of Polish MIG-29s suggests they know something that lots of Internet Tough Guys don’t.
The best lesson for China is to strike first and strike hard.
https://twitter.com/akarlin0/status/1498119654908309505Replies: @silviosilver, @Twinkie, @yakushimaru
And you think Mr. Sailer’s takes are “cartoonish”?
In what reality do you think China will actually strike “US military bases at Guam and Japan when invading Taiwan”? I can’t think of a worse strategy for China, which will, in a stroke, eliminate any anti-war, pro-China business lobby in the U.S., hugely inflame both American and Japanese populations and likely draw all American Pacific allies into a larger regional war against China, even if China were able to occupy Taiwan quickly.
Do you get your ideas on international conflicts from video games?
I think this is a deeply wishful, and indeed “cartoonish,” thinking on your part as a Russian nationalist.
To be fair, this from Japan Times the other day, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2022/03/07/commentary/japan-commentary/japan-china-unstable-relationship/
I've looked deeply into the Second Sino-Japanese War and take a nuanced view*, but an article about Sino-Japanese relationship that does not mention it at all, and simply refers to "end of World War II", is fairly material revisionism**.
From our own John Derbyshire: Even in US textbooks, the First Sino-Japanese War is usually characterized as the nascent move of Japanese imperialism culminating to invasion of China in 1937 and Pearl Harbor. Whereas now Derbs calls it "China surrendered Taiwan to Japan".
It was Karlin I believe, who suggested that in a decade or so, Western MSM will have fully whitewashed Nazi war crimes against USSR, and Japanese war crimes against China. The latter I'm pretty sure is well on its way.
You can imagine how inflammatory this whitewashing could be to PRC Chinese (the Taiwanese may not care so much). The CCP rather, I think has been restrained, from Global Times: Exclusive: Beijing 2022 a ‘catalyst’ for Japan-China friendship. Needless to say I hope it remains the case.
*It in fact have many parallels to the Russo-Ukrainian War in which the aggressor did not lack decent intentions and whose side should be heard; and which external parties, Soviets and the West, had significant roles.
**The author, Anami Usuke 阿南友亮 would have special appreciation for "end of World War II in August 1945" for it meant for him that his grandfather, War Minister Anami Korechika 阿南惟幾 followed the emperor's order to surrender, stopped the palace coup, and committed seppuku. So maybe there are complex reasons for his obfuscation.
That goes double for any kind of combat, where there are opposing wills. Recently another commenter asked for my opinion of what would happen in a particular MMA fight, and I answered similarly. There are just too many unpredictable variables in war, as in a person-to-person fight. In the latter, there is a saying, "So-and-so is totally going to win this fight... unless he slips on a banana peel or something." Well, the world is full of banana peels. So I only offered up what I saw as strengths and weaknesses of each fighter.
I don't have anything original to add about the current Russo-Ukrainian conflict, but I will just make a few personal comments and observations:
1. I was surprised that the Russian air force has not achieved a total control of the air and has not provided a completely dominant overwatch and close air support. I read a number of different theories as to why, but the most plausible explanations (at least to me) seem to be that a) Russian air crews are not well-trained, certainly not on par with the best of Western air forces and are not proficient in mounting high-complexity joint air operations with a lot of aircraft and coordinating ground elements and b) the Russians don't appear to have a large stockpile of precision-guided munitions, with which to launch highly precise attacks on the ground. In absence of those, launching night attacks (to avoid MANPADs) with dumb bombs is bound to be inaccurate and ineffective - and much more likely incur collateral damage.
2. I was also surprised with how easily some Russian armored vehicle columns were ambushed by the Ukrainians in the early part of the war. As a number of observers pointed out, Russian ground forces - here and there - seemed not to operate well as combined arms teams, with armor, infantry, and artillery mutually supporting and covering for each other in advances. That's something one expects of poorly-trained and -motivated conscripts. Given the increasing professionalization of the Russian army in the past decade, I expected a much greater facility in combined arms operations especially at the small scale, tactical level.
3. As well, I found the Ukrainian resistance to be unexpectedly fierce so far. I generally have a pretty dim view of the training level, morale, and effectiveness of armed forces personnel below the first-tier military nations, so I thought the Ukrainians would crumble rather quickly. I think their unexpectedly better resistance forced a re-evaluation and re-thinking on the part of the Western nations, that likely would have written off the conquest of Ukraine, albeit with a lot of verbal furor, denunciations, and recriminations. I certainly did not expect the former comedian president of Ukraine to be so inspirational to his countrymen.
4. All this said, I think the conventional war is still Russia's to lose. The fact remains that there is a huge manpower and materiel disparity between the two forces in Russia's favor. I would think a more salient question wouldn't be so much about whether Russia will or will not win, but how much losses and suffering Russia is willing to incur and to inflict in order to achieve the said victory. For that matter, while Ukrainian morale seems to holding up well so far, formal resistance could collapse quickly if the Ukrainian national command authority were to be captured or killed. These are intangibles that cannot be measured or predicted.
5. Of course, that then begs the question: even if Russia were to win (which is not in any way guaranteed), what will a Russian occupation look like? Israeli military theorist Martin van Creveld once wrote that, in a post-modern world, when the strong fights the weak in a long war, the strong loses. Having failed to topple Ukraine in a lightning attack, Russia will have to use much more destructive means to achieve victory, which will only embitter the population it was supposed to "liberate," even setting aside the enormous international opprobrium. Although hardly assured one way or another, the prospect of a Russian victory being Pyrrhic and the conquest of Ukraine being a poisoned pill cannot be dismissed easily.
6. Yet another question, which I am not in any way qualified answer, is the issue of domestic consensus in Russia. Putin is an undisputed authoritarian leader, but he is not a God-Emperor. Surely he is to a varying degree sensitive to the Russian "street" opinion and domestic legitimacy. As with the CCP in China, I think Putin derives much of that domestic legitimacy from the fact that his rule has coincided with the re-rise of Russia as a world player, not to forget the rise in living standards. I cannot even begin to predict how and to what extent Russia's economy and standard of living will be affected by this war and how long the current domestic consensus (53% or something close to it supporting the war) would persist in the face of varying scenarios of negative outcomes (one shouldn't forget the effect of the Afghan War on the Soviet Union, which turned out to be far more sensitive to losses of its young men than the supposedly more brittle American domestic morale in Vietnam).
I guess this is a rather longwinded version of "Things turned out differently than I thought, and I have no clue what's going to happen next." ;)Replies: @Blinky Bill, @AP
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSftft2sKS6IQCxFQKzks5e9_PxeIFbMxbQWQ&usqp.jpg
https://youtu.be/z0mNYcSqQnsReplies: @Blinky Bill
February 8, 1861, to May 9, 1865 compared with December 1, 1991, to ????, 2022.
Pretty tragic, when you put it in its local context of what happened to California. Yeah, as if that would have happened in LA, in 1984! Equivalent of Jussie Smollet's accusation. And, of course, in the remake, Daniel was replaced with a black. But, then again, maybe there was a hidden message in him being Italian. LOL.Replies: @silviosilver, @LondonBob
Always thought Daniel was a thinly veiled East Coast Jew fighting the evil blind gentile country club kids.
The US had bribed the senior Iraqi commanders not to fight. They are such different wars, fought by different military doctrines and goals, I don’t think it is worth comparison.
I’ve been reading over your older articles, and it seems you got this right back in 2018 – https://www.unz.com/akarlin/ww3/
and most importantly
this assumed an advance from Russia proper – no Crimea, or Belarus. Given how long it took for Russia to get from its border to Kiev (about 7 days or so), this is not far off. To advance towards the Dniepr in the center, Russia probably would need to take Kharkiv (or at least its leadership thinks so), because otherwise logistics become untenable and my guess is it expected Kharkov to be declared an open city, which it almost was, until the ukies militarily occupied it.
Not sure if this is correct, as I’m not too well versed in military matters, but it seems to me that a major lesson of this war is that sieging cities is harder than expected – can’t say if the reports that Russians attempted to bypass Kharkiv is true or not, but if it is, that strongly adds to my argument
Overall, it seems that Russia is performing slightly above expectations, but not nearly as much as what you predicted directly before the war (or quite possibly even the general staff).But given how reserved the russian army is being, that’s honestly not that bad. Destruction of most of the Ukrainian army will probably take slightly more than 2 weeks after the couldron in Donbass is finished, then Kharkiv will fall, allowing Russia to occupy eastern Ukraine, along with a simultaneous push towards taking Odessa and then it seems that Ukraine will focus most of its defenses on Kiev, which will likely be besieged.
https://voxday.net/2022/03/01/ukraine-invasion-a-comparative-analysis/ – this post that estimated how long the occupation would take based on extrapolating the speed of advance up unitl 1.3. and their guess was 40 days
another interesting part of that article
I think you’re right about there being no real insurgency, though – perhaps except in parts of Galicia
For many people of color, nothing is more special than seeing someone on a TV show or in a movie that looks like them. For children, this representation in films is vital because it gives them hope.
The ultimate truth of the matter is that Russia is a relatively untalented/low human capital and utterly corrupt country – this part won’t change – with no real future. Incorporating part of the Ukraine in it won’t change that.
The future lies solely with China, the USA and the EU – the latter two if they ever decide to be realistic about some issues.
This is obvious and it’s what’s really bothering Karlin and leads him to jerk off over this war so hard with these comic book villain proclamations. It’s doubly hilarious that he supplements them with nonsense about the Russian humanitarian spirit that he doesn’t even believe himself.
China refused to supply spare parts for RF aviation needs:
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5250918
https://i.imgur.com/Ovy8Ab6.pngReplies: @Seraphim, @Wielgus
I thought Dmowski was an asshole (albeit post-1945 Poland is strangely similar to his vision in some respects) but this quote is quite insightful.
Is Ukraine's air force gone? No. US DOD claims most of it is still operable and Russia claims the first and second class pilots have been killed but admits that it is still capable of single attempts to sorties by combat aircraft.
Is Kiev surrounded? No. The southern approach is still free. The city is still getting resupplied. It may get surrounded in another couple of days, but it certainly is not surrounded now.Replies: @Rich
Odessa is blockaded by the sea. Kiev is surrounded, now, in the South, according to people on the ground in Ukraine, not in DC in the news room or at the White House propaganda office. From where are these Ukrainian jets taking off and where are they flying missions. I haven’t even heard that from the various Western propagandists. It’s soothing to believe the underdog is fighting hard and having success, and the Ukrainians are tough people, fighting hard, but they aren’t succeeding and from what I see, and I’m not there, I cold be wrong, it looks like the Russian military is steadily taking control of the country.
::::::::::::
Overall, this was involves two things:
1. Russia is losing large numbers of men and equipment. These are not really getting resupplied (about 75% of Russia's usable military is already in Ukraine; we see junk being sent from the Far East, Russia is scraping the bottom of the barrel).
2. Ukraine is also losing men and equipment but at a lower rate after the first couple days, and Ukraine is getting largescale resupplies of both (reserves and territorial defenses and volunteers from abroad keep coming, as do arms shipments of first class weapons)
3. Russia continues to advance steadily but slowly.
I do not know how this war will end, but it seems very likely that Russia will continue to slowly advance while bleeding men and equipment. Eventually it will reach a point when it can no longer advance due to the losses in men and equipment. The question is how far will Russia get before its losses prevent further advance.
Will Russia finally surround Kiev? Likely (but do they have enough to storm the well armed city of 3 million - doubtful). Take Kharkiv? Likely. The city is only 40 km from the border and after 2 weeks and heavy losses Russia has finally managed to just surround it. I'm not sure how long it can hold out. Take Zaporizhia and then Dnipro? Maybe. Odessa too? Maybe, but that's another large well-armed city. I don't pretend to know how much Russia will grab but I know it will be harder and take longer than Russian fanboys think it will. Russia is now making concessions in its peace offerings so it recognizes that things aren't going as well for it as had been expected at the beginning.
Overall, I do expect that Russia will take a lot more than it has now, but I doubt it will be able to take the entire country. And then there will be insurgency. More bleeding.Replies: @Wokechoke
A platoon or squadron of tanks cuts off incoming convoys of food ammo men medicine etc. Stable? Lol. Don’t beclown yourself. The point of tanks is to act as a disruptive element in the rear area of an enemy held position. An attacker doesn’t need to be the stable element. If the Russians are not taking approx 5% hits on their tanks they are not using them right.
Inadvertently the Ukrainian boasts about knocking out tanks here and there indicates the actual positions of the Russian advances. It’s easy enough to track live Russian positions by looking at specific hamlets Ukrainians tweet from and cross checking that on the Google map. Janes also have a map which is proprietary. But that shows Kremenchuk bridge in the Center of Ukraine under attack by the land units of the Russians. It’s hard to believe but it’s also possible given their reckless abandon in comparison to a casualty conscious British or American Army.
Here is where the Russians were earlier today:
https://i.imgur.com/UqBPudc.jpg
As you can see, the city was far from surrounded.
I spoke to my cousin who lives in the city. Her grocery store was full today, she bought some meat, bread and even pet food. So yes, things are going into the city, there is not yet a siege. Soldiers are also coming in. Her neighborhood is quiet, though just in case she sleeps in the corridor, away from windows.
OTOH Bucha (a NW suburb) where I also have cousins is a nightmare. Most got out after the early battles but there is one couple there being used as human shields by the Russians. We lost touch for a few days but were able to make contact yesterday. No safe way out. It is a nightmare. Any further evidence of this supposed land attack? This supposedly happened March 7 and then not a trace of this attack upon the Kremenchuk bridge. Looks like it did not occur.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Dmitry
Odessa is surrounded. Transnistria constitutes a Western facing blocking force. There’s a route out of Odessa but anything doing in can be bombed along the one remaining road and I’d guess the Russians have recon forces on that road anyway.
Not sure if this is correct, as I'm not too well versed in military matters, but it seems to me that a major lesson of this war is that sieging cities is harder than expected - can't say if the reports that Russians attempted to bypass Kharkiv is true or not, but if it is, that strongly adds to my argument
Overall, it seems that Russia is performing slightly above expectations, but not nearly as much as what you predicted directly before the war (or quite possibly even the general staff).But given how reserved the russian army is being, that's honestly not that bad. Destruction of most of the Ukrainian army will probably take slightly more than 2 weeks after the couldron in Donbass is finished, then Kharkiv will fall, allowing Russia to occupy eastern Ukraine, along with a simultaneous push towards taking Odessa and then it seems that Ukraine will focus most of its defenses on Kiev, which will likely be besieged.
https://voxday.net/2022/03/01/ukraine-invasion-a-comparative-analysis/ - this post that estimated how long the occupation would take based on extrapolating the speed of advance up unitl 1.3. and their guess was 40 days
another interesting part of that article I think you're right about there being no real insurgency, though - perhaps except in parts of GaliciaReplies: @Wokechoke
In the old days Kharkov would have been erased by artillery. To encourage the others.
But as some of you have probably heard, Victoria Nuland seems to have admitted it's all true in her Congressional testimony. Glenn Greenwald had an excellent column this morning and Tucker Carlson just did a great segment:
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/victoria-nuland-ukraine-has-biological
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AugzqXPYaOc
I'd say it was an extremely reckless and foolish thing for the American government to have funded the creation of bioweapons facilities controlled by an extremely hostile country bordering Russia.
And it seems to me that countries which do some extremely reckless and foolish things are much more likely to have done other extremely reckless and foolish things in the past, perhaps including things that resulted in the deaths of around a million Americans over the last couple of years:
https://www.unz.com/page/covid-biowarfare-articles/Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
It’s a damn shame that Rand Paul didn’t have the data so he could ask Fauci about this when he had him there under oath. I imagine we might maybe never see Fauci ever again.
To be great, one needs to weed out a children’s hospital? Real valiant stuff Karlin…hope you derive great satisfaction from your “fortune”. 🙁
So, yet another Banderist gayop.
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/366337610
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1501603247785717767
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1501747514420117513Replies: @Mr. Hack
Karlin forgets to mention that the Dmowskites were successfully refuted by the Pilsudskyites. Underneath his Polish/Russian posturing, he always maintained that the Russians were lowly and part of an inferior culture. Well, at least he got something right.
If we knew answers to these questions a lot about Ukraine's near future would become clear.Replies: @Seraphim, @Reactive Reaction
“Speaking of Ukrainian oligarchs, I wonder what they are doing. Are they making deals right now? What kind? With whom?”
The trouble with Israel, from the oligarch POV, is that they could wind up with a shitty apartment surrounded by Haredim and no dock space for the yacht. And Florida is overbuilt.
Half of Mariupol have been cleansed and is free of Azovites. Donetsk forces using MLRS to hunt down Azovites retreating. I think this is the beginning of the end of this infamous battalion.
Ukrainians are claiming some progress outside Kharkiv:
https://twitter.com/unsalorcun82/status/1501683326729527299?s=21Replies: @Wokechoke
Thanks.
The truly great things in history don’t get accomplished through sheer violence, but quietly.
Alexander the Greats conquests dissolved a generation or two after his death, the Athenian Empire barely lasted a generation or so…
The Roman Empire only lasted as long as it did because it provided a long term moral vision, peace and security, like the American Empire (although both in the end were evil).
Christianity, the “loser” philosophy, lasted two thousand years and is still with us, and ruled the fates of kingdoms…
Unprincipled violence makes a splash in the short term but never has long term staying power…
But they never understand this, the short sighted men of power…
I don’t know how this Russian adventure will end, but it will not end in long term glory as Karlin expects.
To be great, one needs to weed out a children's hospital? Real valiant stuff Karlin...hope you derive great satisfaction from your "fortune". :-(Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
Hospital that was occupied by Azov for 3 days beforehand, having dispersed the hospital staff and patients.
So, yet another Banderist gayop.
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/366337610
So, yet another Banderist gayop.
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/366337610
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1501603247785717767
https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1501747514420117513Replies: @Mr. Hack
Yet, more Russian fake news:
“Russia claims without evidence that the maternity hospital it bombed — which killed a child — was a Ukrainian militia base”
https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-says-mariupol-maternity-hospital-militia-base-no-evidence-2022-3
In any case, at the time of the bombing, were any Azov members inside of the hospital?
I am aganostic on the bioweapons. There were 11 sites in Soviet times. The US started to pay to have the stockpiles destroyed in 2005. Some may have been missed, deliberately hidden by Ukrainians. Pharam testing is a big indutry in Ukraine. So some of the labs are still active in pharma.
No way does Ukraine make chemical weapons with ammonia. Russia does. The ammonia plant is in Samara. It is the world's biggest. There was a pipeline to Odessa (maybe Mariupol, I forget) where there was a urea (fertilizer) factory. That was closed in 2014 post war. A new pipeline was built to a place near Taganarog. Ammonia is very energy intensive to make. Ukraine could not make industrial quantities. They couldn't afford the energy. A chemical weapon based on ammonia will be Russian whatever the propaganda claims.Replies: @Mr. Hack
I’ve looked over the photographs of the Pregnant woman, what was she doing in the maternity hospital overnight? Why is she an internet influencer? Why did they let her climb down the stairs? Then change her clothes and carry her in a stretcher over a shell crater? when there’s a perfectly good parking lot outside the building on the other side full of SUV bristling with plate carrying clad men with carbines? Why was the hospital trying to function when it’s filthy from weeks of neglect and has no visible staff to carry out care? I saw no nurses or doctors or administration staff in any of the images. Was she there for a routine late term check up or in labor?
Surely, you're not doubting or denying the wholesale bombing of civilian apartment buildings, houses, churches, medical centers, businesses that have been occurring right from the very beginning of this disastrous war?Replies: @Wokechoke, @Veteran of the Memic Wars
I don’t have any answers to you questions, however, I fail to understand why a hospital should even be considered as a legitimate object of bombardments? It seems like just pat and parcel of terror being unleashed by Russian troops against Ukrainian civilian structures.
Surely, you’re not doubting or denying the wholesale bombing of civilian apartment buildings, houses, churches, medical centers, businesses that have been occurring right from the very beginning of this disastrous war?
Surely, you're not doubting or denying the wholesale bombing of civilian apartment buildings, houses, churches, medical centers, businesses that have been occurring right from the very beginning of this disastrous war?Replies: @Wokechoke, @Veteran of the Memic Wars
I fully expect there to be a massacre in Maruipol though. The hospital according to the Maps available is on the outer north north east suburb of the city. That suburb is on the north bank of a river. A little bit like Irpin in on the Kiev front where that bridge was blown up by retreating Ukrainians. It’s probably the exact area that the Russians will assault once the bombardment stops.
The immediate area around the hospital ought to emptied out of non combatants. Yes, the Russians are sending a warning for people to get out of that area before tanks arrive.
Maybe the city ought to surrender now?
The truly great things in history don't get accomplished through sheer violence, but quietly.
Alexander the Greats conquests dissolved a generation or two after his death, the Athenian Empire barely lasted a generation or so...
The Roman Empire only lasted as long as it did because it provided a long term moral vision, peace and security, like the American Empire (although both in the end were evil).
Christianity, the "loser" philosophy, lasted two thousand years and is still with us, and ruled the fates of kingdoms...
Unprincipled violence makes a splash in the short term but never has long term staying power...
But they never understand this, the short sighted men of power...
I don't know how this Russian adventure will end, but it will not end in long term glory as Karlin expects.Replies: @Wokechoke
Alexander set up several kingdoms for his generals. The Roman Empire can be understood as a post hellenistic successor to the Diadochi. Although they came up with the idea of a Respublica and a war machine to back it. The Greeks provided the material culture and literacy. Remember the Gospel was actually written in Greek. That’s eternity right there.
https://www.amazon.com/Gospels-Modern-Library-Sarah-Ruden/dp/0399592946
Admittedly, the whole thing was just a boyish adventure, a lark, and regarded in that light it's not so bad.
But what was truly enduring about Greece was not it's military or political might but as you note, it's culture, it's language, etc.
And so it always is. Physical power never counts for much in the long run, but that's a lesson that has to be relearned again and again.
Certainly he didn't intend for 40-odd years of constant warfare as his generals carved up his conquests, exerminating the entire Makedonian royal family in the process.
But yes, Christianity is fundamentally a syncretistic faith, mixing Greek paganism and philosophy with Judaism, although the latter predominates. And of course, Rome would have had a much harder time pacifying and governing the East-Med had the region not been undergoing Hellenisation for centuries prior.
As for Aaron B's comment, despite its early spread, the idea Christianity (like any monotheistic religion) didn't owe much of its spread to extreme violence and persecution is pretty dim.Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver
Have you read any of the new Sarah Rudin translation? She has a bunch of comments regarding the meaning of the original Greek words which they never taught me any thing like it in Sunday School.
Actually, I’ve seen ZERO evidence that Fauci had anything to do with the development of Covid let alone the Ukrainian biolabs. Lots of people are (very rightfully) angry at him for all sorts of other reasons, so he’s an ideal foil for them to attack, much like that Klaus Schwab fellow of the World Economic Forum.
Incidentally, I think that Victoria Nuland’s disastrous mistake in admitting the existence of those Ukrainian biolabs greatly strengthens the case I’ve been making that the global Covid outbreak was the result of an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran), as I just pointed out in a short column:
https://www.unz.com/announcement/ukraine-and-biowarfare-conspiracy-theories/
Over the last two years, I’ve accumulated a massive amount of evidence in favor of my hypothesis and the only argument anyone has ever been able to make on the other side is that even rogue elements of the Trump Administration couldn’t possibly have done something so extremely reckless and foolish.
Well, the fact that they apparently set up deadly biowarfare labs right on Russia’s border also seems pretty reckless and foolish…
How old are the Ukrainian laboratories?
It is hard to imagine "new" facilities with "new" scientists. The idea that the U.S. would build a research facility adjacent to the Russian border, near Kharkiv, lacks plausibility.
One giant risk with closing "old" weapons development facilities relates to staff. Scientists & technicians have significant amounts of knowledge in their heads. There are huge risks if they are desperate for money and feel forced to sell that information to feed their families.
In U.S. budget terms, providing a stipend fund is cheap insurance. The scientists get to work on non-military projects and the potential threat of knowledge wandering off is averted. At least one of the "weapons labs" is an agricultural crop science research center.
PEACE 😇
Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy; F. William Engdahl
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNhPYFTXEAAzKYL.jpgReplies: @Veteran of the Memic Wars
Sure, but Alexander did not exactly create a world spanning empire lasting ages.
Admittedly, the whole thing was just a boyish adventure, a lark, and regarded in that light it’s not so bad.
But what was truly enduring about Greece was not it’s military or political might but as you note, it’s culture, it’s language, etc.
And so it always is. Physical power never counts for much in the long run, but that’s a lesson that has to be relearned again and again.
Incidentally, I think that Victoria Nuland's disastrous mistake in admitting the existence of those Ukrainian biolabs greatly strengthens the case I've been making that the global Covid outbreak was the result of an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran), as I just pointed out in a short column:
https://www.unz.com/announcement/ukraine-and-biowarfare-conspiracy-theories/
Over the last two years, I've accumulated a massive amount of evidence in favor of my hypothesis and the only argument anyone has ever been able to make on the other side is that even rogue elements of the Trump Administration couldn't possibly have done something so extremely reckless and foolish.
Well, the fact that they apparently set up deadly biowarfare labs right on Russia's border also seems pretty reckless and foolish...Replies: @Wokechoke, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Blinky Bill
That broad is a fucking disaster zone. They didn’t expect the Russians to go all in like this. So many of these Congress critters have lost their retirement plans bacause of this invasion.
Incidentally, I think that Victoria Nuland's disastrous mistake in admitting the existence of those Ukrainian biolabs greatly strengthens the case I've been making that the global Covid outbreak was the result of an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran), as I just pointed out in a short column:
https://www.unz.com/announcement/ukraine-and-biowarfare-conspiracy-theories/
Over the last two years, I've accumulated a massive amount of evidence in favor of my hypothesis and the only argument anyone has ever been able to make on the other side is that even rogue elements of the Trump Administration couldn't possibly have done something so extremely reckless and foolish.
Well, the fact that they apparently set up deadly biowarfare labs right on Russia's border also seems pretty reckless and foolish...Replies: @Wokechoke, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Blinky Bill
Mr. Unz,
How old are the Ukrainian laboratories?
It is hard to imagine “new” facilities with “new” scientists. The idea that the U.S. would build a research facility adjacent to the Russian border, near Kharkiv, lacks plausibility.
One giant risk with closing “old” weapons development facilities relates to staff. Scientists & technicians have significant amounts of knowledge in their heads. There are huge risks if they are desperate for money and feel forced to sell that information to feed their families.
In U.S. budget terms, providing a stipend fund is cheap insurance. The scientists get to work on non-military projects and the potential threat of knowledge wandering off is averted. At least one of the “weapons labs” is an agricultural crop science research center.
PEACE 😇
I don't in general read Ron's pieces because they are so goofy, but that sounds about right and very entertaining - I will have to check that out. .
Wow, well that's a fascinating idea.
There are so many ways to wage war - some of the most subtle can be the most successful.
For the "Slave empire" to actually take over the West from within rather than stupidly confronting it's power - is such subtlety even possible in our blunt, stupid, and crass age?
It would be like Christianity taking over the Roman Empire from within - precisely through a process of refusing to fight it.
Are Slavs approaching their moment in history when they can become a "world historical" people - the moment when they push the engine of history forward?
All peoples more or less get this moment.
Probably not quite yet - but maybe soon. The strength and fervor of the Ukrainian resistance is something deeply interesting and suggestive. Russia in it's current iteration seems played out - only more of the old.
I don't know...
The times are becoming interesting.Replies: @Barbarossa, @Justvisiting
I am grateful to Ron for two things:
–This website where we can seriously debate a variety of topics
–His amusing “resistance” to “crazy conspiracy theories”–They are all “crazy” until the magic moment when he finally believes them–one at a time. All it takes is a couple of “respectable” folks to “get it” and Ron is persuaded. That is a rather creative approach to epistemology.
😉
It turns out when she said “fuck the EU” she was more serious than she intended. She was just acting like a bad ass braggadocio and now look at them. : (
I have no love for Azovites or their Russian Nazi enemies. At this point however Azov is just a sideshow to the overall Ukrainian military effort, while the entire state of Russia is behaving like Germany or Italy in the late 1930s.
Ukrainians are claiming some progress outside Kharkiv:
Ukrainians are claiming some progress outside Kharkiv:
https://twitter.com/unsalorcun82/status/1501683326729527299?s=21Replies: @Wokechoke
Kharkov is surrounded. It should surrender before extermination.
Look at the train station n in Berlin.
That goes double for any kind of combat, where there are opposing wills. Recently another commenter asked for my opinion of what would happen in a particular MMA fight, and I answered similarly. There are just too many unpredictable variables in war, as in a person-to-person fight. In the latter, there is a saying, "So-and-so is totally going to win this fight... unless he slips on a banana peel or something." Well, the world is full of banana peels. So I only offered up what I saw as strengths and weaknesses of each fighter.
I don't have anything original to add about the current Russo-Ukrainian conflict, but I will just make a few personal comments and observations:
1. I was surprised that the Russian air force has not achieved a total control of the air and has not provided a completely dominant overwatch and close air support. I read a number of different theories as to why, but the most plausible explanations (at least to me) seem to be that a) Russian air crews are not well-trained, certainly not on par with the best of Western air forces and are not proficient in mounting high-complexity joint air operations with a lot of aircraft and coordinating ground elements and b) the Russians don't appear to have a large stockpile of precision-guided munitions, with which to launch highly precise attacks on the ground. In absence of those, launching night attacks (to avoid MANPADs) with dumb bombs is bound to be inaccurate and ineffective - and much more likely incur collateral damage.
2. I was also surprised with how easily some Russian armored vehicle columns were ambushed by the Ukrainians in the early part of the war. As a number of observers pointed out, Russian ground forces - here and there - seemed not to operate well as combined arms teams, with armor, infantry, and artillery mutually supporting and covering for each other in advances. That's something one expects of poorly-trained and -motivated conscripts. Given the increasing professionalization of the Russian army in the past decade, I expected a much greater facility in combined arms operations especially at the small scale, tactical level.
3. As well, I found the Ukrainian resistance to be unexpectedly fierce so far. I generally have a pretty dim view of the training level, morale, and effectiveness of armed forces personnel below the first-tier military nations, so I thought the Ukrainians would crumble rather quickly. I think their unexpectedly better resistance forced a re-evaluation and re-thinking on the part of the Western nations, that likely would have written off the conquest of Ukraine, albeit with a lot of verbal furor, denunciations, and recriminations. I certainly did not expect the former comedian president of Ukraine to be so inspirational to his countrymen.
4. All this said, I think the conventional war is still Russia's to lose. The fact remains that there is a huge manpower and materiel disparity between the two forces in Russia's favor. I would think a more salient question wouldn't be so much about whether Russia will or will not win, but how much losses and suffering Russia is willing to incur and to inflict in order to achieve the said victory. For that matter, while Ukrainian morale seems to holding up well so far, formal resistance could collapse quickly if the Ukrainian national command authority were to be captured or killed. These are intangibles that cannot be measured or predicted.
5. Of course, that then begs the question: even if Russia were to win (which is not in any way guaranteed), what will a Russian occupation look like? Israeli military theorist Martin van Creveld once wrote that, in a post-modern world, when the strong fights the weak in a long war, the strong loses. Having failed to topple Ukraine in a lightning attack, Russia will have to use much more destructive means to achieve victory, which will only embitter the population it was supposed to "liberate," even setting aside the enormous international opprobrium. Although hardly assured one way or another, the prospect of a Russian victory being Pyrrhic and the conquest of Ukraine being a poisoned pill cannot be dismissed easily.
6. Yet another question, which I am not in any way qualified answer, is the issue of domestic consensus in Russia. Putin is an undisputed authoritarian leader, but he is not a God-Emperor. Surely he is to a varying degree sensitive to the Russian "street" opinion and domestic legitimacy. As with the CCP in China, I think Putin derives much of that domestic legitimacy from the fact that his rule has coincided with the re-rise of Russia as a world player, not to forget the rise in living standards. I cannot even begin to predict how and to what extent Russia's economy and standard of living will be affected by this war and how long the current domestic consensus (53% or something close to it supporting the war) would persist in the face of varying scenarios of negative outcomes (one shouldn't forget the effect of the Afghan War on the Soviet Union, which turned out to be far more sensitive to losses of its young men than the supposedly more brittle American domestic morale in Vietnam).
I guess this is a rather longwinded version of "Things turned out differently than I thought, and I have no clue what's going to happen next." ;)Replies: @Blinky Bill, @AP
Thank you. You are by far the most knowledgeable military expert writing around here (perhaps the only military expert), your comment is much appreciated.
I have one very strongly Russian nationalist family branch in Ukraine (children of an uncle who lived in Russia and returned to Ukraine with a Russian wife). The usual stuff – “Ukrainians and Russians are one people”, staunch members of the Russian Orthodox Church, had opposed Maidan, etc. They are now messaging me about if I’ve heard if America will close the skies so that the murderous Russians will stop killing our people.
I came across a very true comment – Putin managed to do what Ukrainian nationalists had failed to do in 30 years – convince even Eastern Ukrainians that Bandera was correct about the Russians.
On the front we should see the impact of 17,000 anti-tank weapons and several hundreds of Stingers delivered in last week and a new batch of drones from Turkey that was brought to Polish-Ukrainian border two days ago.
Ukrainian propaganda should emphasize battlefield successes more for continued military support rather than Russian atrocities.
The MiG-29 debacle demonstrated that the US does not have what it takes when after publicly egging Poland on to transfer the MiGs to Ukraine it got cold feet when the ball was in its court.
Sanctions are too weak. Germany does everything to do nothing.
Zelensky is right that no-fly zone should be imposed. In the game of nuclear chicken you can't be a chicken by refusing even to enter the game.Replies: @Rich, @Dmitry, @Seaghan, @Veteran of the Memic Wars
Be well!
I came across a very true comment - Putin managed to do what Ukrainian nationalists had failed to do in 30 years - convince even Eastern Ukrainians that Bandera was correct about the Russians.Replies: @sudden death, @utu, @Anatoly Karlin, @Pharmakon, @Twinkie
Considering Ukrainians managed to shoot down 5 various RF Sukhoi bomber planes last week, they’re doing the closing job quite well themselves too.
Their assets are being destroyed in both Ukraine and Russia. That will be the biggest economic consequence of the war. Their easy gains after 1990, and now easy losses – the oligarchs basically privatized public assets and watched them go up in value as order returned. They are not happy, and Washington is desperately pleading with them and threatening them so they overthrow Russia’s government.
It is amusing to watch: soft power meets hard power. Financial ‘assets‘ meet soldiers. As in the past when those two meet, the soft power shrieks and the hard power prevails.
There is a hit to prestige, but also a reassertion of reality over virtual worlds. This will be tough on a lot of people, they will never forgive.
The Decline of the West (Oswald Spengler). No the same words but the very same idea.
I came across a very true comment - Putin managed to do what Ukrainian nationalists had failed to do in 30 years - convince even Eastern Ukrainians that Bandera was correct about the Russians.Replies: @sudden death, @utu, @Anatoly Karlin, @Pharmakon, @Twinkie
I agree that Twinkie’s comments here are good and sensible. Comments of many others and Karlin’s in particular are on subhuman level and should be ignored but not forgotten.
On the front we should see the impact of 17,000 anti-tank weapons and several hundreds of Stingers delivered in last week and a new batch of drones from Turkey that was brought to Polish-Ukrainian border two days ago.
Ukrainian propaganda should emphasize battlefield successes more for continued military support rather than Russian atrocities.
The MiG-29 debacle demonstrated that the US does not have what it takes when after publicly egging Poland on to transfer the MiGs to Ukraine it got cold feet when the ball was in its court.
Sanctions are too weak. Germany does everything to do nothing.
Zelensky is right that no-fly zone should be imposed. In the game of nuclear chicken you can’t be a chicken by refusing even to enter the game.
- Great Britain has given to Ukraine 3615 NLAW, which can destroy any tanks. Ukraine also has received probably a lot of Javelins.
Ukrainians have also some number of domestically designed anti-tank laser guided missiles "Skif" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skif_(ATGM) ). They have released about a dozen videos showing they are using allegedly this Ukrainian anti-tank missile. https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/t8yehx/this_is_how_actually_russian_columns_are_being/Replies: @songbird, @Wokechoke
It seems like the dumb Poles, who are the biggest parasites on Western Europe and the EU, are also the biggest Russo-phobic maniacs throughout this whole episode and are obsessed with trying to embroil the whole world in a wider conflict. Freeloading Russia-hating Poles are the cause of most of Europe’s problems.
Setting up the sanctions trap for China to walk into… we might end up with hostile tertiary sanctions for those who do business with targets of secondary sanctions (e.g. whoever banks and retailers depending on UnionPay since it is partnering with MIR). The 2 groups combined can be a sizable chunk of the Chinese economy, enough to trigger a private divestment campaign like the one we’re seeing with Russia. A123 will love this for an opportunity to exploit for his Trumpist bloc autarky/hard decoupling dreams.
(reposting from the dead past thread so don’t delete)
The term "Trumpist" is also wholly incorrect in terms of lingustics. The MAGA movement is much larger than a single individual. "Christian Populist" is much more accurate identification.
_____
A hard decoupling will be the 2nd Great Leap Backwards for the PRC. If Xi and his CCP Elites wish to starve millions of Chinese peasants to death... There is little the civilized world can do to intervene.
America is food independent. Energy independence is also easy for the U.S. once the science deniers are moved out. It will not be painless, but a hard decoupling will lead to long term prosperity.
PEACE 😇Replies: @iffen, @Yellowface Anon
I agree. Putin has both blood and iron and he’s also got grain, gas and oil. The last three Hitler did not have. There’s also strong sympathy for him among Arabs, Indians and Chinese.
You sound like you’re discussing a conflict with your long ago ex-wife who rejected you, or even mother, or probably actually both, not the Putinist attempt at the systematic destruction and murder of a European country of 40 million people. Go see a therapist. You have no idea what reality is.
Probably it wasn’t intentional, but this phrasing is pretty misleading, implying that Alexander had any sort of plan for succession prior to his death, intending to divide his empire up like that.
Certainly he didn’t intend for 40-odd years of constant warfare as his generals carved up his conquests, exerminating the entire Makedonian royal family in the process.
But yes, Christianity is fundamentally a syncretistic faith, mixing Greek paganism and philosophy with Judaism, although the latter predominates. And of course, Rome would have had a much harder time pacifying and governing the East-Med had the region not been undergoing Hellenisation for centuries prior.
As for Aaron B’s comment, despite its early spread, the idea Christianity (like any monotheistic religion) didn’t owe much of its spread to extreme violence and persecution is pretty dim.
Certainly he didn't intend for 40-odd years of constant warfare as his generals carved up his conquests, exerminating the entire Makedonian royal family in the process.
But yes, Christianity is fundamentally a syncretistic faith, mixing Greek paganism and philosophy with Judaism, although the latter predominates. And of course, Rome would have had a much harder time pacifying and governing the East-Med had the region not been undergoing Hellenisation for centuries prior.
As for Aaron B's comment, despite its early spread, the idea Christianity (like any monotheistic religion) didn't owe much of its spread to extreme violence and persecution is pretty dim.Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver
Well, yeah he died young. I am familiar with the Hellenistic Kingdoms that followed. Maybe his commanders murdered him. The Greek influence on the world via that trashing of Persia was pretty profound anyway.
Henry Higgins
Where were you when NATO destroyed Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan? When Georgia attacked South Ossetia and Kiev bombed Donbas for 8 years killing 10k civilians?
Was that systematic enough for you? Are only European countries worth your concern?
That is reality, it all happened. With your level of hypocrisy therapy won’t help. You hide and pretend to forget. You blubbered here about ‘Western good intentions’ in the past, a very detached naive view.
I do care more about Europeans as an abstract.
Do you have a problem with that? Good for you.
And yes, I particularly care for white Europeans. Indeed, of my 6 favourite people in the world, all are very white and all but one has light eyes and light hair. Is that morally wrong???
You can call that racist stuff, or just, you know, having a family.
I also know in my heart that every living being deserves love and compassion, but not being God, I recognise that my affection is limited and idiosyncratic. Shocking, I know!
One thing however that I am not limited in, for whatever reason, is my ability to be honest with myself. Whereas it seems that you are extremely limited in this regard. Go back, read my comment and ask yourself how come your view of geopolitics corresponds just so perfectly with your personal emotional life.
Lol, how absurd.
But don't worry. Your life was actually important and well lived. You just can't see it. Nonetheless, you needed to learn what you are in the process of learning, slowly, and you'll have such a great feeling of existence when you eventually realise it, at the near end of your this lifetime or perhaps next.
(Btw, Anatoly, I made this point about Beckow prior to seeing the news about Kanye. I promise. Pretty funny. If you want to do sterling work as a Russian propagandist you should advise that they follow online keywords like "cheap whisky", "misery" and, perhaps rather hopefully for them, "Viagra.")Replies: @Beckow
SO, I AM GOING TO PUT OUT A CALL TO ALL MY SUBSCRIBERS:
PLEASE Respond to this tweet and add suggestions for all the excellent #Twitter sources that tell the story not shown in the Western media. Thank you!
…
There are a lot of #Telegram sources in Russian.
The following one is in English—they select Russian sources and translate them. Here:
t.me
Military events in Ukraine
All important military or social events in Ukraine
https://t.me/military_events_in_Ukraine
There are good Russian sources. I will give you a few:
https://t.me/boris_rozhin
https://t.me/rybar
https://t.me/voenkorKotenok
https://t.me/mig41
https://t.me/voenacher
https://web.telegram.org/z/#-1497591396
https://web.telegram.org/z/#-1215462939
DIRECTLY FROM INSIDE #KHARKOV:
https://t.me/z_kharkovnash
Not so much on twitter. aside from Gleb Bazov there is RWApodcast, Mark Sleboda, anybody else?
If you want to follow the war developments it’s best to sign up for the Telegram app. In English on Telegram there is also Russian Min Defense English https://t.me/mod_russia_en and Bellum Acta https://t.me/BellumActaNews
Probably the two famous people/characters I've most often been told I look like are Daniel LaRusso (ie the Karate Kid) and Danny Zuko (Travolta in Grease). I can see the likeness with Daniel, but I don't think I look like Travolta at all, not even in that movie. I think it's just the slick greasy hair I've been known to sport, combined with my penchant for wearing black leather jackets that forms the association for people. Oh and Fonzie from Happy Days too, but again it's more the jacket than actually looking like him.Replies: @songbird
Heard the TV show is “woke around the edges” so to speak. Is there a tranny character or a gay, or something? If so, I don’t think I could watch it.
Reminds me a bit of Queen’s “Princes of the Universe” from the Highlander movie. I mean, not to be too harsh on Queen, but it does have a gay tinge at the very end. I suppose Freddy Mercury would still be alive, if we lived in a less tolerant world.
Another optimistic ’80s movie song I like is “Never Say Die” by King Cobra for the movie Iron Eagle, which probably should be considered like Delta Force, an Israeli propaganda film intended to make young American’s aggressive toward Arabs.
When I was around 8 or 9, I remember several people telling me I looked like JFK, which I find unsettling, as I think he was a weird-looking guy, and I don’t understand how I could have looked like him as a boy. Later, in my teens, I think I was told I look like the drummer from U2, which I can’t really see either. Fact is, I don’t think I have a double anywhere in the world, unless I was secretly cloned.
Actually, now that I think about it the spread of Greek culture, and especially it’s total adoption by Rome, provides almost as good an example as Christianity for the idea that genuine transformation isn’t accomplished with force.
It’s also interesting that twice Rome adopted the culture of a people they defeated and completely transformed themselves in their image. That’s remarkable and suggests things about what constitutes victory and defeat that the simple minded men of force cannot understand.
Back to the original idea, for Slavs and Russia to join the EU and transform it from within?
One precondition for being a cultural hegemon – or an initiator of cultural change on a vast scale – is to be physically weak, it seems. Neitzsche once made the point that one only has so much energy, and if one devotes this to military strength one will have nothing left to devote to “matters of the spirit”.
It seems to me he was largely correct in this.
The West is right now the wealthiest and most powerful culture on the planet, and has been devoting all it’s energies to building up physical wealth and power – so it’s not surprising that the West should be culturally and spiritually empty.
China of course is even worse in these departments.
So then – if we follow the rule of cultural renewal only being successfully undertaken by the physically weak, the defeated peoples, the losers in the game of power and wealth all the “smart” people think is so important, well then, we should expect global culture to be saved from some peripheral state or people, some defeated group or nation.
Ultimately, it is the fate of the smart, powerful people to be dominated by the people they physically defeat 🙂
And that is an amusing, and cheering, idea.
Oh, I am sure it wasn't just numbers. They had a certain genius, but partly that was derived from their numbers, though not entirely.
Meanwhile, early Christianity probably did a better job of maximizing fertility than other cults, so also a numbers game.
Though, it is my personal theory that Ukraine could have been conquered culturally. With a large amount of effort and thought. But I might be wrong about that. Hard to match the volume of the sinister effluvia and money coming from the West.Replies: @AaronB
The people of Mariupol ought to surrender. They are in a hopeless military situation and are effectively being held hostage by dead ender fanatics. Kharkov too. Encouraging them to fight against a conventional military besieging them is proof your position is insane.
As for Mariupol, henceforth to be known as Helm's Deep, I pray to any listening being to aid their relief. And who knows how it will turn out? It is always darkest before the dawn.Replies: @Wokechoke
You could have been writing such texts to people of Moscow and Leningrad in 1941 and even getting hefty rewards in reichsmarks for that 😉
1) You can't possibly succeed against a larger force.
2) We will deny you the status of heroes.
It's such textbook propoganda meant to sap morale.
People fight and die to be heroes.
However, for the imperialistic force to "explain" to their victims that they are not autonomous individuals but merely weak children being manipulated, and that imperialistic force "knows better" what they think - this is absolutely disastrous propoganda, but surprisingly difficult for imperialistic forces to avoid.
It's primary effect is to stiffen resistance, because it provides such an absolutely glaring reminder of the paternalistic contempt in which the imperialistic power holds it's victim - and just how much of an "inferior" he is considered by the aggressor force, with all the implications this has for what sort of treatment he will suffer should he be conquered. It's such a perfect reflection of the attitude or arrogance and contempt that led to the physical invasion to begin with.
Much better propoganda would be to recognize and express admiration for the heroism and sacrifice of your victim - to show that you do not consider him a contemptible inferior, but a fully autonomous actor - to convince him he may expect respect and dignified treatment, some level of equality, should he be conquered - to convince him his sacrifice may not be necessary.
That might stand a chance of weakening morale. But contempt only stiffens resistance.
Nevertheless, imperial empires can never resist expressing this kind of utterly counterproductive, paternalistic contempt for their victims, because it is the natural outgrowth of the imperial mindset.
They wouldn't be imperial if they didn't have this very mindset and value system, and expressing it clearly is a necessary part of the "fun" of being imperial.
So they have no choice, really, to be stupid and self defeating...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke, @John Leonard
https://twitter.com/DeItaone/status/1501298833627791360
(reposting from the dead past thread so don't delete)Replies: @A123
I have repeatedly stated that the better option is a gradual decoupling. So, “love” is clearly invalid language construction
The term “Trumpist” is also wholly incorrect in terms of lingustics. The MAGA movement is much larger than a single individual. “Christian Populist” is much more accurate identification.
_____
A hard decoupling will be the 2nd Great Leap Backwards for the PRC. If Xi and his CCP Elites wish to starve millions of Chinese peasants to death… There is little the civilized world can do to intervene.
America is food independent. Energy independence is also easy for the U.S. once the science deniers are moved out. It will not be painless, but a hard decoupling will lead to long term prosperity.
PEACE 😇
I just came from the local Wally-world and there was not a single bag of Goldfish. Just goes to show the "depth" of knowledge of an Israeli propaganda bot.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa
The State Department decides when a hard decoupling will start, and Not-your-President Brandon/Blinken are testing the water with Russia, to be extended to China when the cost to global trade is clear. It won't be stopped even if the stock market loses 70% of the value overnight and Soviet-style shortages pop up all over the West - causing the largest famine in human history doesn't stop them from cutting off potential Russian grain exports by severing Russian finance's links to the American-led economic order. Good luck.Replies: @A123, @A123
Incidentally, I think that Victoria Nuland's disastrous mistake in admitting the existence of those Ukrainian biolabs greatly strengthens the case I've been making that the global Covid outbreak was the result of an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran), as I just pointed out in a short column:
https://www.unz.com/announcement/ukraine-and-biowarfare-conspiracy-theories/
Over the last two years, I've accumulated a massive amount of evidence in favor of my hypothesis and the only argument anyone has ever been able to make on the other side is that even rogue elements of the Trump Administration couldn't possibly have done something so extremely reckless and foolish.
Well, the fact that they apparently set up deadly biowarfare labs right on Russia's border also seems pretty reckless and foolish...Replies: @Wokechoke, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Blinky Bill
https://journal-neo.org/2022/02/16/davos-and-the-purloined-letter-conspiracy/
Davos and the Purloined Letter Conspiracy; F. William Engdahl
Right, it seemed like such obvious propoganda meant to undermine morale 🙂
1) You can’t possibly succeed against a larger force.
2) We will deny you the status of heroes.
It’s such textbook propoganda meant to sap morale.
People fight and die to be heroes.
However, for the imperialistic force to “explain” to their victims that they are not autonomous individuals but merely weak children being manipulated, and that imperialistic force “knows better” what they think – this is absolutely disastrous propoganda, but surprisingly difficult for imperialistic forces to avoid.
It’s primary effect is to stiffen resistance, because it provides such an absolutely glaring reminder of the paternalistic contempt in which the imperialistic power holds it’s victim – and just how much of an “inferior” he is considered by the aggressor force, with all the implications this has for what sort of treatment he will suffer should he be conquered. It’s such a perfect reflection of the attitude or arrogance and contempt that led to the physical invasion to begin with.
Much better propoganda would be to recognize and express admiration for the heroism and sacrifice of your victim – to show that you do not consider him a contemptible inferior, but a fully autonomous actor – to convince him he may expect respect and dignified treatment, some level of equality, should he be conquered – to convince him his sacrifice may not be necessary.
That might stand a chance of weakening morale. But contempt only stiffens resistance.
Nevertheless, imperial empires can never resist expressing this kind of utterly counterproductive, paternalistic contempt for their victims, because it is the natural outgrowth of the imperial mindset.
They wouldn’t be imperial if they didn’t have this very mindset and value system, and expressing it clearly is a necessary part of the “fun” of being imperial.
So they have no choice, really, to be stupid and self defeating…
But if we take contempt as a form of bullying, then Ukraine is oppressing Donbass, Russia is oppressing Ukraine and USA is oppressing Russia.
In reality, underdogs are just as able to express contempt as overdogs are. It doesn't require great resources.
One may for instance be contemptuous of imperialists.
I came across a very true comment - Putin managed to do what Ukrainian nationalists had failed to do in 30 years - convince even Eastern Ukrainians that Bandera was correct about the Russians.Replies: @sudden death, @utu, @Anatoly Karlin, @Pharmakon, @Twinkie
They are not nationalists, they are normies. No matter. Normie opinions are as irrelevant as they are malleable.
Daily reminder: Shock and disbelief is inevitable.
The term "Trumpist" is also wholly incorrect in terms of lingustics. The MAGA movement is much larger than a single individual. "Christian Populist" is much more accurate identification.
_____
A hard decoupling will be the 2nd Great Leap Backwards for the PRC. If Xi and his CCP Elites wish to starve millions of Chinese peasants to death... There is little the civilized world can do to intervene.
America is food independent. Energy independence is also easy for the U.S. once the science deniers are moved out. It will not be painless, but a hard decoupling will lead to long term prosperity.
PEACE 😇Replies: @iffen, @Yellowface Anon
America is food independent.
I just came from the local Wally-world and there was not a single bag of Goldfish. Just goes to show the “depth” of knowledge of an Israeli propaganda bot.
I heard they are farm raised in fetid conditions in Indonesia fed on a diet of expired off brand Doritos.
Gross.Replies: @iffen
Wouldn’t you have preferred that Leningrad surrendered?
Death cults are sometimes all the rage.
1) You can't possibly succeed against a larger force.
2) We will deny you the status of heroes.
It's such textbook propoganda meant to sap morale.
People fight and die to be heroes.
However, for the imperialistic force to "explain" to their victims that they are not autonomous individuals but merely weak children being manipulated, and that imperialistic force "knows better" what they think - this is absolutely disastrous propoganda, but surprisingly difficult for imperialistic forces to avoid.
It's primary effect is to stiffen resistance, because it provides such an absolutely glaring reminder of the paternalistic contempt in which the imperialistic power holds it's victim - and just how much of an "inferior" he is considered by the aggressor force, with all the implications this has for what sort of treatment he will suffer should he be conquered. It's such a perfect reflection of the attitude or arrogance and contempt that led to the physical invasion to begin with.
Much better propoganda would be to recognize and express admiration for the heroism and sacrifice of your victim - to show that you do not consider him a contemptible inferior, but a fully autonomous actor - to convince him he may expect respect and dignified treatment, some level of equality, should he be conquered - to convince him his sacrifice may not be necessary.
That might stand a chance of weakening morale. But contempt only stiffens resistance.
Nevertheless, imperial empires can never resist expressing this kind of utterly counterproductive, paternalistic contempt for their victims, because it is the natural outgrowth of the imperial mindset.
They wouldn't be imperial if they didn't have this very mindset and value system, and expressing it clearly is a necessary part of the "fun" of being imperial.
So they have no choice, really, to be stupid and self defeating...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke, @John Leonard
They ought to surrender.
1) You can't possibly succeed against a larger force.
2) We will deny you the status of heroes.
It's such textbook propoganda meant to sap morale.
People fight and die to be heroes.
However, for the imperialistic force to "explain" to their victims that they are not autonomous individuals but merely weak children being manipulated, and that imperialistic force "knows better" what they think - this is absolutely disastrous propoganda, but surprisingly difficult for imperialistic forces to avoid.
It's primary effect is to stiffen resistance, because it provides such an absolutely glaring reminder of the paternalistic contempt in which the imperialistic power holds it's victim - and just how much of an "inferior" he is considered by the aggressor force, with all the implications this has for what sort of treatment he will suffer should he be conquered. It's such a perfect reflection of the attitude or arrogance and contempt that led to the physical invasion to begin with.
Much better propoganda would be to recognize and express admiration for the heroism and sacrifice of your victim - to show that you do not consider him a contemptible inferior, but a fully autonomous actor - to convince him he may expect respect and dignified treatment, some level of equality, should he be conquered - to convince him his sacrifice may not be necessary.
That might stand a chance of weakening morale. But contempt only stiffens resistance.
Nevertheless, imperial empires can never resist expressing this kind of utterly counterproductive, paternalistic contempt for their victims, because it is the natural outgrowth of the imperial mindset.
They wouldn't be imperial if they didn't have this very mindset and value system, and expressing it clearly is a necessary part of the "fun" of being imperial.
So they have no choice, really, to be stupid and self defeating...Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke, @John Leonard
How do you say “Glory to the heroes” in Ukrainian? Let them have their glory then.
They have earned their glory, though, and they don't need me to give it to them.
One of the creepier things I'm seeing on the alt right is this attempt to deny the Ukrainians their heroism and sacrifice, and assure them that they are merely pathetic children who can't possibly know their own minds, and they, American alt righters, know much better that Ukrainians are being manipulated, and their chosen leader who they've rallied around and been inspired by, is actually manipulating them etc etc.
I mean, it's ok to support Russia - not really, you'd have to be pretty cretinous and dumb, but I can see some kind of retarded right wing argument of the kind that Putin represents an attractive alternative to Global Liberalism etc that we would all prefer to live in lol.
Deluded, but ok, some people can't help being retarded (and as someone who deeply wants to see the current Woke Materialism replaced by a much better spiritual vision, if Putin is your more appealing alternative than you have a serious, serious, serious PR problem - and not just a PR problem, but a philosophical problem lol).
But why do the alt righters always do the ignoble and low-class trashy thing - why are their moral instincts always so reliably trashy - when it comes to how they talk about Ukrainians dying for their beliefs.
I mean, a little self-overcoming, a little respect for your enemy, is actually noble.Replies: @Justvisiting, @songbird, @Coconuts
The way world events have been shaping up in the last eight years (Russia and Ukraine were of paramount importance even for Trump's presidency), I'm afraid that you either have had to learn that Ukrainian slogan and have some hope of understanding what's going on or you haven't and are at the mercy of MSM propaganda.
In any case, it's good to see that AK accepts that he was wrong in part of his predictions due to the stubborn resistance of the Ukrainians but it seems clear that the Kremlin had similar expectations and this miscalculation is likely to have strategic consequences beyond the simple timeline of events.
You know that things have become dicey for the Russians when even Colonelcassad's telegram channel includes posts that criticize the Russians' military incompetence and attributes part of the responsibility for civilian losses to them.Replies: @Wokechoke
I just came from the local Wally-world and there was not a single bag of Goldfish. Just goes to show the "depth" of knowledge of an Israeli propaganda bot.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa
Some raving lunatic has a closet full of goldfish.
The goldfish manufacturer (which multinational owns Pepridge Farms?) loves this shit.
If you eat less goldfish and more peanuts and raisins your insulin chain will be grateful!

__________(1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/09/global-governments-begin-warning-of-critical-food-shortages/
Stalin ordered that they fight until death. Or starve until death. Or kill their children and eat them to the children’s death.
Death cults are sometimes all the rage.
It's also interesting that twice Rome adopted the culture of a people they defeated and completely transformed themselves in their image. That's remarkable and suggests things about what constitutes victory and defeat that the simple minded men of force cannot understand.
Back to the original idea, for Slavs and Russia to join the EU and transform it from within?
One precondition for being a cultural hegemon - or an initiator of cultural change on a vast scale - is to be physically weak, it seems. Neitzsche once made the point that one only has so much energy, and if one devotes this to military strength one will have nothing left to devote to "matters of the spirit".
It seems to me he was largely correct in this.
The West is right now the wealthiest and most powerful culture on the planet, and has been devoting all it's energies to building up physical wealth and power - so it's not surprising that the West should be culturally and spiritually empty.
China of course is even worse in these departments.
So then - if we follow the rule of cultural renewal only being successfully undertaken by the physically weak, the defeated peoples, the losers in the game of power and wealth all the "smart" people think is so important, well then, we should expect global culture to be saved from some peripheral state or people, some defeated group or nation.
Ultimately, it is the fate of the smart, powerful people to be dominated by the people they physically defeat :)
And that is an amusing, and cheering, idea.Replies: @songbird
Probably, it was more quotidian than that. The Greeks were influential on the Romans because they had greater numbers than them. I assume that you are also referring to the Etruscans. Same thing again.
Oh, I am sure it wasn’t just numbers. They had a certain genius, but partly that was derived from their numbers, though not entirely.
Meanwhile, early Christianity probably did a better job of maximizing fertility than other cults, so also a numbers game.
Though, it is my personal theory that Ukraine could have been conquered culturally. With a large amount of effort and thought. But I might be wrong about that. Hard to match the volume of the sinister effluvia and money coming from the West.
But if numbers were a significant factor, the much larger Near Eastern empires would have been much more culturally influential, and that tiny peninsula jutting out of the Western half of Asia would not have been the greatest cultural influencer in the history of the world :)
As for the early Christians, they achieved dominance on a timescale far too small for fertility patterns to play a significant role - assuming they even did have better fertility.
I am starting to read an interesting book called "The Patient Ferment" about the early Christians and how they spread - the thesis of the book is that the early Christians lived in a visibly more appealing way - they were, at least at first, really more loving, harmonious, kind, cheerful than their pagan neighbors, who at that late date in antiquity were often very corrupted in their personal and sexual lives, and who had lost their zest for life and were attached to uninspiring philosophies of "consolation", such as Stoicism and Epicureanism that were about reducing pain rather than living joyously.
That being said, I'm not suggesting there is some kind of absolute division between spirit and the physical - in fact the two are closely interlinked.
Spiritual health and physical health and flourishing go hand in hand! And one of the first indicators of a corrupt or dying spirituality is physical breakdown, as we are seeing today.
However, the relationship is one that is "non-obvious", in that prioritizing physical survival as the materialist does actually makes one less good at surviving long term - and making power and wealth your priority, likewise, makes flourishing and ultimate survival less certain.
Because as the oldest and truest spiritual adage has it - you must give up your life to save it.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird
Certainly he didn't intend for 40-odd years of constant warfare as his generals carved up his conquests, exerminating the entire Makedonian royal family in the process.
But yes, Christianity is fundamentally a syncretistic faith, mixing Greek paganism and philosophy with Judaism, although the latter predominates. And of course, Rome would have had a much harder time pacifying and governing the East-Med had the region not been undergoing Hellenisation for centuries prior.
As for Aaron B's comment, despite its early spread, the idea Christianity (like any monotheistic religion) didn't owe much of its spread to extreme violence and persecution is pretty dim.Replies: @Wokechoke, @silviosilver
Well, until Christians got into power, they didn’t really have the ability to systematically persecute anyone. So there certainly was an element of essentially peaceful spreading. When they became the official state religion, they really ratcheted up the persecution. If the pagans had treated Christians with the same brutality that Christians treated pagans, Christianity would never have gotten off the ground.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Triumph_of_faith_by_Eugene_Thirion.jpgReplies: @German_reader
Secularize Paganism & declare temples public goods = take bricks from them freely
https://web.archive.org/web/20160304070043/http://mosmaiorum.org/persecution_list.html
Yahya can cry about being white or peaceful monotheism. In the end, the Sword rules. Pagan or Jew
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @silviosilver
That’s if they ever tell them the truth. Now they’ve banned Russian media in the West and the information superhighway is jammed with Western propaganda we’re entering the Orwellian 1984 situation with regard to what news the public is served. Even if some speck of truth gets through it’ll be dismissed as lies and Russian propaganda. And the minute of hate is now all day long, day in day out.
Wow, nice defensive outburst that ranted totally off topic and thank you for absolutely confirming my observation about you.
I’ll go a little with you on one of your two deflections, because it helps me further explain my point and because I have nothing to be ashamed of.
I do care more about Europeans as an abstract.
Do you have a problem with that? Good for you.
And yes, I particularly care for white Europeans. Indeed, of my 6 favourite people in the world, all are very white and all but one has light eyes and light hair. Is that morally wrong???
You can call that racist stuff, or just, you know, having a family.
I also know in my heart that every living being deserves love and compassion, but not being God, I recognise that my affection is limited and idiosyncratic. Shocking, I know!
One thing however that I am not limited in, for whatever reason, is my ability to be honest with myself. Whereas it seems that you are extremely limited in this regard. Go back, read my comment and ask yourself how come your view of geopolitics corresponds just so perfectly with your personal emotional life.
Lol, how absurd.
But don’t worry. Your life was actually important and well lived. You just can’t see it. Nonetheless, you needed to learn what you are in the process of learning, slowly, and you’ll have such a great feeling of existence when you eventually realise it, at the near end of your this lifetime or perhaps next.
(Btw, Anatoly, I made this point about Beckow prior to seeing the news about Kanye. I promise. Pretty funny. If you want to do sterling work as a Russian propagandist you should advise that they follow online keywords like “cheap whisky”, “misery” and, perhaps rather hopefully for them, “Viagra.”)
The Russian military is in a hopeless position. There is no way for them to pacify Ukraine. They are being held hostage by a botoxified, aged President and his corrupt coterie. Tens of thousands of them will die for the cause of murdering Ukrainians. They should all immediately turn back home, put a 7.62 in Putin’s head and go see their mothers with some flowers to say sorry for almost breaking their hearts.
As for Mariupol, henceforth to be known as Helm’s Deep, I pray to any listening being to aid their relief. And who knows how it will turn out? It is always darkest before the dawn.
In the future, I hope someone goes through U2’s catalog and systematically purges the woke parts of it, using DeepFake to make the lyrics based. “Pride” will become a song about Enoch Powell. “Angel of Harlem” will be about a Dutchwoman. Instead of BB King, Bono will collaborate with Morrisey.
Why is assets in sneer quotes? There is much sense in what you say (and some nonsense too – “Ukes are going to desert en masse, just you watch!”), but the inner commie can’t help coming out, I guess.
Financial assets aren’t mere fictions. They inextricably tied to production. Someone has to produce something that someone wants to buy in order for there to be a claim on the cashflows that are hence produced – ie a financial asset. If I have a legal claim on a cashflow, damn straight I am thinking of that as asset.
Has anyone ever really pretended that financial assets, of themselves, could stand up to hard military force? Not as far as I know. But perhaps there is a case to be made that Europe has been too absorbed in hedonistic values and neglected the military factor that is the ultimate guarantor of prosperity.
I just came from the local Wally-world and there was not a single bag of Goldfish. Just goes to show the "depth" of knowledge of an Israeli propaganda bot.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa
They aren’t even wild caught in Alaska like they used to be.
I heard they are farm raised in fetid conditions in Indonesia fed on a diet of expired off brand Doritos.
Gross.
That's where that after taste in the Flavor Blasted Xtra Cheddar comes from!
I used to not being able to understand the English lyrics, until I do. 😩😂
The best lesson for China is to strike first and strike hard.
https://twitter.com/akarlin0/status/1498119654908309505Replies: @silviosilver, @Twinkie, @yakushimaru
I don’t believe pulling off a Pearl Harbor would be the lesson learned by China.
Actually, the lesson for China should’ve been pretty straight forward. It is to make preparations, more preparations. And if it is made to align with general development instead of a bunker attitude, then it should be settled. The other parties can do not much at all.
Oh, I am sure it wasn't just numbers. They had a certain genius, but partly that was derived from their numbers, though not entirely.
Meanwhile, early Christianity probably did a better job of maximizing fertility than other cults, so also a numbers game.
Though, it is my personal theory that Ukraine could have been conquered culturally. With a large amount of effort and thought. But I might be wrong about that. Hard to match the volume of the sinister effluvia and money coming from the West.Replies: @AaronB
Wait, there were more Greeks than Romans?
But if numbers were a significant factor, the much larger Near Eastern empires would have been much more culturally influential, and that tiny peninsula jutting out of the Western half of Asia would not have been the greatest cultural influencer in the history of the world 🙂
As for the early Christians, they achieved dominance on a timescale far too small for fertility patterns to play a significant role – assuming they even did have better fertility.
I am starting to read an interesting book called “The Patient Ferment” about the early Christians and how they spread – the thesis of the book is that the early Christians lived in a visibly more appealing way – they were, at least at first, really more loving, harmonious, kind, cheerful than their pagan neighbors, who at that late date in antiquity were often very corrupted in their personal and sexual lives, and who had lost their zest for life and were attached to uninspiring philosophies of “consolation”, such as Stoicism and Epicureanism that were about reducing pain rather than living joyously.
That being said, I’m not suggesting there is some kind of absolute division between spirit and the physical – in fact the two are closely interlinked.
Spiritual health and physical health and flourishing go hand in hand! And one of the first indicators of a corrupt or dying spirituality is physical breakdown, as we are seeing today.
However, the relationship is one that is “non-obvious”, in that prioritizing physical survival as the materialist does actually makes one less good at surviving long term – and making power and wealth your priority, likewise, makes flourishing and ultimate survival less certain.
Because as the oldest and truest spiritual adage has it – you must give up your life to save it.
1. Rome had an epidemic of demonic possession. The Christians were really skilled at exorcising demons.
2. The morals of middle class Romans had begun to imitate the upper classes in terms of drinking and promiscuity. The Christians had exemplary family values. Whether their theology made the greatest sense or not, people wanted to be like them.
The most popular preacher in Houston is Joel Osteen. He is a complete charlatan but he is great at marketing. People go to his church by the thousands because they want to be like Joel Osteen. Stoicism and Empiricism and Neoplatonism and Hermetism may have competed for thinkers, but most of the people were illiterate.Replies: @AaronB
I agree with much of the rest of your comment. What we are seeing today is the mimetic idea of wokeness spread, which is as "contagious" as early Christianity, but which encourages non-adaptive behaviors, unlike early Christianity.Replies: @sher singh
On the front we should see the impact of 17,000 anti-tank weapons and several hundreds of Stingers delivered in last week and a new batch of drones from Turkey that was brought to Polish-Ukrainian border two days ago.
Ukrainian propaganda should emphasize battlefield successes more for continued military support rather than Russian atrocities.
The MiG-29 debacle demonstrated that the US does not have what it takes when after publicly egging Poland on to transfer the MiGs to Ukraine it got cold feet when the ball was in its court.
Sanctions are too weak. Germany does everything to do nothing.
Zelensky is right that no-fly zone should be imposed. In the game of nuclear chicken you can't be a chicken by refusing even to enter the game.Replies: @Rich, @Dmitry, @Seaghan, @Veteran of the Memic Wars
Who do you want to enforce a “no-fly zone”? America? Nato? Are you really in favor of starting WW3? I understand the Ukrainians asking for it, but anyone outside of Ukraine who would try it, is obviously calling for a nuclear war. The Russians didn’t invade the US, they didn’t even invade one of our erstwhile allies, they invaded a country that’s been in their sphere of influence forever. I like Ukrainians, they’re a nice people, but I don’t remember any of them fighting alongside Americans in Korea, Vietnam, various Central American adventures, Afghanistan, Iraq, or Africa. They are not, nor have they ever been, an ally of the US.
As for Mariupol, henceforth to be known as Helm's Deep, I pray to any listening being to aid their relief. And who knows how it will turn out? It is always darkest before the dawn.Replies: @Wokechoke
The Germans were happy to have the Leningrad population starve to death. Hitler wanted that City erased. Moscow on the other hand was unconquerable. Too large to populous too sprawling. Leningrad could be hemmed in more or less and only had one supply route. It was just enough supply to resist the siege and neglect by the Germans. Who should have stormed the city.
Maruipol can’t be supplied. They should surrender. But that would mean the band of lunatics controlling the town are going to have to be heroic.
There’s a whiff of sulphur in the Ukie Case.
All Western “journalists” are in Kiev waiting for “the big battle” while the real action is west of Donbass, where Ukrainian tropos are being methodically encircled. There is just a crazy Chinese journo following the action in Mariupol and now in this front. The guy is awesome. He has guts.
2.2 million Ukrainians quit Ukraine. That’s deserting. How many more are internally refugees?
Another optimistic '80s movie song I like is "Never Say Die" by King Cobra for the movie Iron Eagle, which probably should be considered like Delta Force, an Israeli propaganda film intended to make young American's aggressive toward Arabs.
When I was around 8 or 9, I remember several people telling me I looked like JFK, which I find unsettling, as I think he was a weird-looking guy, and I don't understand how I could have looked like him as a boy. Later, in my teens, I think I was told I look like the drummer from U2, which I can't really see either. Fact is, I don't think I have a double anywhere in the world, unless I was secretly cloned.Replies: @silviosilver
Oh the tv show. Umm, not that I can remember, and I am usually highly sensitive to this sort of thing – although, again, I’ve only watched some five episodes.
I can take a gay character as long as he or his gayness is merely in the background, and even then the most I can take is a momentary direct reference to it (and I’d probably never watch that film again). “Strong” female characters don’t bother me, although recent ones – especially in “hero” roles – have me rolling my eyes every few minutes. A tranny in any capacity, I’d immediately switch it off.
I could see (I think) the direction the plot was going, and I thought it was being nicely set up. If you weren’t a fan of the movie, you probably wouldn’t care to watch, but if you were, the tv show should hold your interest.
I don’t know – I’m not Ukrainian. Maybe I should learn, though.
They have earned their glory, though, and they don’t need me to give it to them.
One of the creepier things I’m seeing on the alt right is this attempt to deny the Ukrainians their heroism and sacrifice, and assure them that they are merely pathetic children who can’t possibly know their own minds, and they, American alt righters, know much better that Ukrainians are being manipulated, and their chosen leader who they’ve rallied around and been inspired by, is actually manipulating them etc etc.
I mean, it’s ok to support Russia – not really, you’d have to be pretty cretinous and dumb, but I can see some kind of retarded right wing argument of the kind that Putin represents an attractive alternative to Global Liberalism etc that we would all prefer to live in lol.
Deluded, but ok, some people can’t help being retarded (and as someone who deeply wants to see the current Woke Materialism replaced by a much better spiritual vision, if Putin is your more appealing alternative than you have a serious, serious, serious PR problem – and not just a PR problem, but a philosophical problem lol).
But why do the alt righters always do the ignoble and low-class trashy thing – why are their moral instincts always so reliably trashy – when it comes to how they talk about Ukrainians dying for their beliefs.
I mean, a little self-overcoming, a little respect for your enemy, is actually noble.
Is that a "win" worth fighting for? It is not that Ukrainians don't "know their own minds", it is just they do not understand the end game that "victory" will bring.Replies: @AaronB
But praise amounts to social rhetoric. It is meant to encourage outcomes, or to gain status by riding someone's coattails. People called Islamic terrorists "cowards", not because they believed that, but because it would be socially malign or imprudent to praise them.
We must remember that rhetoric leads to policy, else why would policy-makers (many very odious people) be full of praise for this abstract spiritual quality called "bravery?" Who amongst these pols praising Ukrainian sacrifice would have praised the men of the Easter Rising, if it happened today? I'll answer: none because it would be against their goals and their masters.Replies: @AaronB
I have to say that I go with Russia on this one. Both sides are being atrocious in generating propaganda, naturally.
I am aganostic on the bioweapons. There were 11 sites in Soviet times. The US started to pay to have the stockpiles destroyed in 2005. Some may have been missed, deliberately hidden by Ukrainians. Pharam testing is a big indutry in Ukraine. So some of the labs are still active in pharma.
No way does Ukraine make chemical weapons with ammonia. Russia does. The ammonia plant is in Samara. It is the world’s biggest. There was a pipeline to Odessa (maybe Mariupol, I forget) where there was a urea (fertilizer) factory. That was closed in 2014 post war. A new pipeline was built to a place near Taganarog. Ammonia is very energy intensive to make. Ukraine could not make industrial quantities. They couldn’t afford the energy. A chemical weapon based on ammonia will be Russian whatever the propaganda claims.
The term "Trumpist" is also wholly incorrect in terms of lingustics. The MAGA movement is much larger than a single individual. "Christian Populist" is much more accurate identification.
_____
A hard decoupling will be the 2nd Great Leap Backwards for the PRC. If Xi and his CCP Elites wish to starve millions of Chinese peasants to death... There is little the civilized world can do to intervene.
America is food independent. Energy independence is also easy for the U.S. once the science deniers are moved out. It will not be painless, but a hard decoupling will lead to long term prosperity.
PEACE 😇Replies: @iffen, @Yellowface Anon
Screechers gonna screech.
The State Department decides when a hard decoupling will start, and Not-your-President Brandon/Blinken are testing the water with Russia, to be extended to China when the cost to global trade is clear. It won’t be stopped even if the stock market loses 70% of the value overnight and Soviet-style shortages pop up all over the West – causing the largest famine in human history doesn’t stop them from cutting off potential Russian grain exports by severing Russian finance’s links to the American-led economic order. Good luck.
Everyone rational expects Not-The-President Biden's directives to be rapidly & 100% reversed. His puppeteers lack the power to do much of anything. They could not even arrange a few MiG's for Ukraine. If the CCP Elites start a unilateral decoupling, Xi will deliver the largest famine in human history to China's workers. Ukraine is likely to have one or more poor harvests due to combat operations. Russia cannot supply all of the calories that China is currently importing from America.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Yellowface Anon
Here is a Christian Populist demonstrating the total lack of influence wielded by Not-The-President Biden's regime: (1)
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Duda-Statement-1.jpg
Serious leaders are equally dismissive of the heir apparent.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/10/during-presser-poland-president-andrzej-duda-politely-scolds-secretary-blinken-for-making-up-green-light-fighter-jet-story/
I do care more about Europeans as an abstract.
Do you have a problem with that? Good for you.
And yes, I particularly care for white Europeans. Indeed, of my 6 favourite people in the world, all are very white and all but one has light eyes and light hair. Is that morally wrong???
You can call that racist stuff, or just, you know, having a family.
I also know in my heart that every living being deserves love and compassion, but not being God, I recognise that my affection is limited and idiosyncratic. Shocking, I know!
One thing however that I am not limited in, for whatever reason, is my ability to be honest with myself. Whereas it seems that you are extremely limited in this regard. Go back, read my comment and ask yourself how come your view of geopolitics corresponds just so perfectly with your personal emotional life.
Lol, how absurd.
But don't worry. Your life was actually important and well lived. You just can't see it. Nonetheless, you needed to learn what you are in the process of learning, slowly, and you'll have such a great feeling of existence when you eventually realise it, at the near end of your this lifetime or perhaps next.
(Btw, Anatoly, I made this point about Beckow prior to seeing the news about Kanye. I promise. Pretty funny. If you want to do sterling work as a Russian propagandist you should advise that they follow online keywords like "cheap whisky", "misery" and, perhaps rather hopefully for them, "Viagra.")Replies: @Beckow
Spare us your old lady psycho-babble. You didn’t answer my points because you have no answer. That is worse than deflection, that is in effect a capitulation.
We all seem to care more Europe, so do I – but that doesn’t mean that murdering non-Europeans is not even noticed. You try desperately to ignore it, not to see it, reaffirming all the worst stereotypes about Europeans. Well, at least about elderly women semi-retarded Europeans.
I would remind you that Serbs are Europeans – the attack on Serbia by NATO was what started this unfortunate chain of events. Didn’t that bother you?
I have no idea who Kenya is, do you mean the country? You seem to live in your own head, no rules, no context, no deflections, no other viewpoints.
Russia will have a pyrrhic victory even if they can fully mobilize and throw conscripts at Ukraine, and leverage their export position.
Even a Gay and Nazi country has resolve when facing existential threat, and Russians aren’t facing the Gays, but the Nazis. Export embargoes and bans hurt both the supplier and consumer.
Opinions are not so malleable when blood is involved. Putin has managed to even lose eastern Ukrainians to Russia for a generation.
Blood is thicker than water, but so is shit.
The Ukrainian people could have avoided this by giving a little autonomy to the Donbass and pledging military neutrality.
It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
Dem Jews?Replies: @AP
Patrick Lancaster is also reporting from there and he’s still on youtube.
https://twitter.com/vicktop55/status/1502175213563219969Replies: @Blinky Bill
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbjTWVaRx6jMN5ZYgbqe2_w
for instance
Ukraine War: In Search Of Life In Ghost Towns Near Donetsk Airport (Very Sad) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b01GZoiYjaQ
Anti Ukraine DPR Evacuates Key City (Debaltsevo) By Train. (Family Members Left Behind) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX6FACY_50s
Russia & DPR Take Control Of Volnovakha (Update)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1V0ygeTGh7k
and many others. He also interviews people in Russian - there are English subtitles.
People show how their homes have been destroyed by shelling by Ukraine Banderist nationalists
Excess food calories are produced in America. Higher fertilizer prices may slightly reduce output, however the average American girth shows that the nation is nowhere near a food shortage. (1)
Spot shortages of specific SKU’s are not even panic buying. Multinational BigAg firms weaved a supply chain heavily reliant on shipping. Overreaction to the CCP’s WUHAN-19 virus generated port restrictions. Most of the products missing from shelves tie back to this. (1)
MAGA Reindustrialization is America’s long term solution to avoiding disruptions when unreliable foreign suppliers fail to deliver.
Europe needs something similar. For example, weaning itself from unreliable natural gas suppliers. It would be best to do this gradually, but Europe could survive a hard decoupling.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/09/global-governments-begin-warning-of-critical-food-shortages/
I heard they are farm raised in fetid conditions in Indonesia fed on a diet of expired off brand Doritos.
Gross.Replies: @iffen
fed on a diet of expired off brand Doritos.
That’s where that after taste in the Flavor Blasted Xtra Cheddar comes from!
Opinions are not so malleable when blood is involved.
Blood is thicker than water, but so is shit.
The Ukrainian people could have avoided this by giving a little autonomy to the Donbass and pledging military neutrality.
It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
Dem Jews?
How would you (or the regular American people) like it if the Mexican parts of the USA were given special autonomous status and given the right to veto national policies that they didn't like? One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:
http://d39raawggeifpx.cloudfront.net/styles/16_9_desktop/s3/articleimages/bnePeople_Ukraine_Vadim_Rabinovich__For_LIfe_political_party_leader_wiki.jpg_7_Cropped.jpgReplies: @iffen, @iffen, @Wokechoke
They have earned their glory, though, and they don't need me to give it to them.
One of the creepier things I'm seeing on the alt right is this attempt to deny the Ukrainians their heroism and sacrifice, and assure them that they are merely pathetic children who can't possibly know their own minds, and they, American alt righters, know much better that Ukrainians are being manipulated, and their chosen leader who they've rallied around and been inspired by, is actually manipulating them etc etc.
I mean, it's ok to support Russia - not really, you'd have to be pretty cretinous and dumb, but I can see some kind of retarded right wing argument of the kind that Putin represents an attractive alternative to Global Liberalism etc that we would all prefer to live in lol.
Deluded, but ok, some people can't help being retarded (and as someone who deeply wants to see the current Woke Materialism replaced by a much better spiritual vision, if Putin is your more appealing alternative than you have a serious, serious, serious PR problem - and not just a PR problem, but a philosophical problem lol).
But why do the alt righters always do the ignoble and low-class trashy thing - why are their moral instincts always so reliably trashy - when it comes to how they talk about Ukrainians dying for their beliefs.
I mean, a little self-overcoming, a little respect for your enemy, is actually noble.Replies: @Justvisiting, @songbird, @Coconuts
I think what you are actually seeing on the “alt right” is the belief that a Ukraine “win” will leave the country a vassal of the US and Western Europe, looted by western plutocrats, flooded with third world immigration, and dominated by Big Tech censorship.
Is that a “win” worth fighting for? It is not that Ukrainians don’t “know their own minds”, it is just they do not understand the end game that “victory” will bring.
What does - mildly - annoy me is what seems to me the slimy and trashy way they go about it. But that's more or less how they do everything.
It's possible to support Russia, while respecting Ukraine.
Honestly, I can't see how Putin's Russia represents something better than Woke Materialism - moreover, I think Russia is increasingly a materialistic culture like the West.
And I agree that Ukraine allying with the Woke West is a serious spiritual danger - but I have a feeling they will weather it.Replies: @Justvisiting, @Barbarossa
The State Department decides when a hard decoupling will start, and Not-your-President Brandon/Blinken are testing the water with Russia, to be extended to China when the cost to global trade is clear. It won't be stopped even if the stock market loses 70% of the value overnight and Soviet-style shortages pop up all over the West - causing the largest famine in human history doesn't stop them from cutting off potential Russian grain exports by severing Russian finance's links to the American-led economic order. Good luck.Replies: @A123, @A123
There is an easy solution. If you want the screeching to stop. All you have to do is stop shilling and screeching for your precious Xi. Are you related to Godfree Roberts?
Incorrect. The CCP will unilaterally decide if a hard decoupling will occur.
Everyone rational expects Not-The-President Biden’s directives to be rapidly & 100% reversed. His puppeteers lack the power to do much of anything. They could not even arrange a few MiG’s for Ukraine.
If the CCP Elites start a unilateral decoupling, Xi will deliver the largest famine in human history to China’s workers. Ukraine is likely to have one or more poor harvests due to combat operations. Russia cannot supply all of the calories that China is currently importing from America.
PEACE 😇
No one decides upon decoupling now because it will be a sectoral cascade event with a poorly recognized starting point. I singled out Russian sanctions as a possible starting point. If China hard decoupled, they could immediately run full trains with grain from Russia at rock-bottom prices - no longer any unilateral sanctions to appease. Servicing China will be enough for Russia's grain exports.
Brandon's handlers have all the power to manage things, and when it's Trump's handlers' turn again, they will keep the parts suiting their agenda and shelve the rest. No total reversal of directives relating to foreign policy. They hold back MiGs because Putin will nuke wherever airport they are transferred in Poland, which will trigger NAT Article 5 and start WWIII proper. They have decided not to escalate to the level of all-out military confrontation.
No peace for you.Replies: @A123
Inadvertently the Ukrainian boasts about knocking out tanks here and there indicates the actual positions of the Russian advances. It’s easy enough to track live Russian positions by looking at specific hamlets Ukrainians tweet from and cross checking that on the Google map. Janes also have a map which is proprietary. But that shows Kremenchuk bridge in the Center of Ukraine under attack by the land units of the Russians. It’s hard to believe but it’s also possible given their reckless abandon in comparison to a casualty conscious British or American Army.Replies: @AP
When food and people regularly come in and out of the city then the city is not blocked or surrounded. Even if a small Russian group pushes in some direction before getting destroyed.
Here is where the Russians were earlier today:
As you can see, the city was far from surrounded.
I spoke to my cousin who lives in the city. Her grocery store was full today, she bought some meat, bread and even pet food. So yes, things are going into the city, there is not yet a siege. Soldiers are also coming in. Her neighborhood is quiet, though just in case she sleeps in the corridor, away from windows.
OTOH Bucha (a NW suburb) where I also have cousins is a nightmare. Most got out after the early battles but there is one couple there being used as human shields by the Russians. We lost touch for a few days but were able to make contact yesterday. No safe way out. It is a nightmare.
Any further evidence of this supposed land attack? This supposedly happened March 7 and then not a trace of this attack upon the Kremenchuk bridge. Looks like it did not occur.
Currently, they are driving groups of tanks on the roads to Kiev. They are staying only on roads. This is the Northern roads are blockaded, not the land. This convoy has driven to North East city near Kiev, then returns after artillery.
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1501873146818969610If they had continued to drive further, there would be kilometers of forest next to roads before entering Kiev, where they could be target of infantry with panzerfaust, etc. So, who knows what the mission is? Reconnaissance? Strangely, this convoy includes a TOS-1 which would create such a large explosion to destroy the convoy, if it would be hit. Yet they added this TOS-1 to mix along with the tanks. It also include T72A which was constructed in 1970s Nizhny Tagil. https://twitter.com/raging545/status/1501860337691377667
So, these convoys driving near to Kiev are not showing currently the more modern vehicles. Although, in terms of the protection, the old T-72 is at least an improvement from those BMDs going for suicide drives in the early days.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke
Blood is thicker than water, but so is shit.
The Ukrainian people could have avoided this by giving a little autonomy to the Donbass and pledging military neutrality.
It is so simply and obvious that we must look for a reason why it was not done.
Dem Jews?Replies: @AP
Russia demanded that the autonomous territory be given veto power over the rest of the country’s policies. No country would tolerate that. It would mean EU off the table and Ukraine either forced into Eurasia or in its unaffiliated limbo that led to impoverishment after the USSR split up (in contrast to every one of its neighbors who linked to the EU and who got a lot wealthier by doing so). Majority of Ukrainian people rejected this.
How would you (or the regular American people) like it if the Mexican parts of the USA were given special autonomous status and given the right to veto national policies that they didn’t like?
One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:
Black Americans have a veto power over who the Democratic Presidential nominee will be. That translates into a more or less 50% veto over who will be the American President.
“Heroim slava”, of course.
The way world events have been shaping up in the last eight years (Russia and Ukraine were of paramount importance even for Trump’s presidency), I’m afraid that you either have had to learn that Ukrainian slogan and have some hope of understanding what’s going on or you haven’t and are at the mercy of MSM propaganda.
In any case, it’s good to see that AK accepts that he was wrong in part of his predictions due to the stubborn resistance of the Ukrainians but it seems clear that the Kremlin had similar expectations and this miscalculation is likely to have strategic consequences beyond the simple timeline of events.
You know that things have become dicey for the Russians when even Colonelcassad’s telegram channel includes posts that criticize the Russians’ military incompetence and attributes part of the responsibility for civilian losses to them.
Gen. Ben Hodges: “I Believe That Ukraine Is Going To Win”
But if numbers were a significant factor, the much larger Near Eastern empires would have been much more culturally influential, and that tiny peninsula jutting out of the Western half of Asia would not have been the greatest cultural influencer in the history of the world :)
As for the early Christians, they achieved dominance on a timescale far too small for fertility patterns to play a significant role - assuming they even did have better fertility.
I am starting to read an interesting book called "The Patient Ferment" about the early Christians and how they spread - the thesis of the book is that the early Christians lived in a visibly more appealing way - they were, at least at first, really more loving, harmonious, kind, cheerful than their pagan neighbors, who at that late date in antiquity were often very corrupted in their personal and sexual lives, and who had lost their zest for life and were attached to uninspiring philosophies of "consolation", such as Stoicism and Epicureanism that were about reducing pain rather than living joyously.
That being said, I'm not suggesting there is some kind of absolute division between spirit and the physical - in fact the two are closely interlinked.
Spiritual health and physical health and flourishing go hand in hand! And one of the first indicators of a corrupt or dying spirituality is physical breakdown, as we are seeing today.
However, the relationship is one that is "non-obvious", in that prioritizing physical survival as the materialist does actually makes one less good at surviving long term - and making power and wealth your priority, likewise, makes flourishing and ultimate survival less certain.
Because as the oldest and truest spiritual adage has it - you must give up your life to save it.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird
There were two big reasons according to the person I know who studied the history the longest. He was doing a history PhD but then he bagged that and went to another school to become a minister.
1. Rome had an epidemic of demonic possession. The Christians were really skilled at exorcising demons.
2. The morals of middle class Romans had begun to imitate the upper classes in terms of drinking and promiscuity. The Christians had exemplary family values. Whether their theology made the greatest sense or not, people wanted to be like them.
The most popular preacher in Houston is Joel Osteen. He is a complete charlatan but he is great at marketing. People go to his church by the thousands because they want to be like Joel Osteen. Stoicism and Empiricism and Neoplatonism and Hermetism may have competed for thinkers, but most of the people were illiterate.
It was a whole way of life, not based on competitive aggression, and so very unlike the basic principles of pagan life, and also obviously more joyous and optimistic in a deep sense than offered by the popular pagan philosophies.
Ultimately, by their fruits shall you judge them.
The fact is, there is a sort of "eternal Way" that may be summarized by the Sermon On The Mount, but appears in different forms in all the religions, and that mankind is continually straying from towards self-aggrandizement, but that to follow is the path to deeply rooted flourishing.
Periodically, one needs a "realignment" to bring us back into accord with the Way, after having strayed too far.
We are obviously in such a time today.
The first individuals and small groups who reject the dominant culture and return to the Way, will inevitably attract attention as they live obviously happier and more joyous lives, and flourish in ways that people in the dominant culture don't - these people will serve as catalysts for change.
The history of early Christianity is an excellent template for this.
Ultimately, no one wants to be miserable - no one looks at Karlin or Chieh and says, wow, they seem so happy I want to be like them lol - or looks at the alt-right and thinks, yeah, these ego-monsters seem so happy and flourishing let me join - but people are afraid and don't see alternatives.
So at first, small groups and individuals must provide lived evidence of the alternatives, that are seeds. That's why probably the most important thing any of us can do really is live rightly well, and not necessarily expend much effort "convincing" anyone of anything - argument and discussion can be fun, but lived example is transformative.Replies: @A123
Here is where the Russians were earlier today:
https://i.imgur.com/UqBPudc.jpg
As you can see, the city was far from surrounded.
I spoke to my cousin who lives in the city. Her grocery store was full today, she bought some meat, bread and even pet food. So yes, things are going into the city, there is not yet a siege. Soldiers are also coming in. Her neighborhood is quiet, though just in case she sleeps in the corridor, away from windows.
OTOH Bucha (a NW suburb) where I also have cousins is a nightmare. Most got out after the early battles but there is one couple there being used as human shields by the Russians. We lost touch for a few days but were able to make contact yesterday. No safe way out. It is a nightmare. Any further evidence of this supposed land attack? This supposedly happened March 7 and then not a trace of this attack upon the Kremenchuk bridge. Looks like it did not occur.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Dmitry
It’s that janes map. To be fair I didn’t believe that. However Those highways to the west are cut.
The way world events have been shaping up in the last eight years (Russia and Ukraine were of paramount importance even for Trump's presidency), I'm afraid that you either have had to learn that Ukrainian slogan and have some hope of understanding what's going on or you haven't and are at the mercy of MSM propaganda.
In any case, it's good to see that AK accepts that he was wrong in part of his predictions due to the stubborn resistance of the Ukrainians but it seems clear that the Kremlin had similar expectations and this miscalculation is likely to have strategic consequences beyond the simple timeline of events.
You know that things have become dicey for the Russians when even Colonelcassad's telegram channel includes posts that criticize the Russians' military incompetence and attributes part of the responsibility for civilian losses to them.Replies: @Wokechoke
Oh I know the phrase.
How would you (or the regular American people) like it if the Mexican parts of the USA were given special autonomous status and given the right to veto national policies that they didn't like? One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:
http://d39raawggeifpx.cloudfront.net/styles/16_9_desktop/s3/articleimages/bnePeople_Ukraine_Vadim_Rabinovich__For_LIfe_political_party_leader_wiki.jpg_7_Cropped.jpgReplies: @iffen, @iffen, @Wokechoke
veto power over the rest of the country’s policies. No country would tolerate that
Black Americans have a veto power over who the Democratic Presidential nominee will be. That translates into a more or less 50% veto over who will be the American President.
Is that a "win" worth fighting for? It is not that Ukrainians don't "know their own minds", it is just they do not understand the end game that "victory" will bring.Replies: @AaronB
Fair enough, I’m not really bothered by the fact that the alt right supports Russia.
What does – mildly – annoy me is what seems to me the slimy and trashy way they go about it. But that’s more or less how they do everything.
It’s possible to support Russia, while respecting Ukraine.
Honestly, I can’t see how Putin’s Russia represents something better than Woke Materialism – moreover, I think Russia is increasingly a materialistic culture like the West.
And I agree that Ukraine allying with the Woke West is a serious spiritual danger – but I have a feeling they will weather it.
Reading the US Constitution these days is enough to make an adult cry--almost nothing in the document represents the facts on the ground.Replies: @AaronB
It's quite distressing when they go back to Russia to see family because so many of them want to be hyper-Americanized. My friends give them a hard time because they are more traditional in America than the Russians who are actually in Russia.
My friends certainly were very Americanized for a time since their parents encouraged assimilation. They partied and imbibed pop culture and materialism, but ultimately found it deeply lacking. They saw the shallow flip side to the glittering coin of materialism.
Their Russian family back in the homeland only sees the glittering reflection of material aspiration that Hollywood reflects. They are taken in by the image of breezy convenience, sexiness, and alluring excess. They are taken in by the sales pitch.
Sometimes one only realizes what one has when it's gone, and it takes much longer to build something back than it takes to throw it away.Replies: @AaronB
The trouble with Israel, from the oligarch POV, is that they could wind up with a shitty apartment surrounded by Haredim and no dock space for the yacht. And Florida is overbuilt.Replies: @Dmitry
Israel has space for yachts, but I don’t think will receive some flood of oligarch. Although their families can of course continue moving to the EU or USA.
Sanctions for individual people have been still limited and just on a narrow circle near the political top. They only start to expand slightly from politicians.
EU just begins to sanction some of the most famous Jewish oligarchs e.g. Dmitry Pumpyansky this week. But you know their families and children could still live in the EU. BBC description of new sanctions mentions Pumpyansky and (most of his life Israeli) Vinokurov.

Also not all of the oligarchs are necessarily cynical and trying to exit. Pumpyansky is famous as paying for Jewish events in Ekaterinburg, but it can be because he actually likes it as some religion and culture activity, not just because he needs to escape to Israel.
Israel also has a negative situation in relation to taxes for the wealthy people. It might also have information sharing agreements now with both Western countries and Russia, so I’m doubting it would so good for hiding money there.
Overall, Israel has always been very good for not being attractive for wealthy people. It’s still a leading country for “anti-glamor” and “anti-luxury” in my opinion. Not so much of Monaco there yet. Relatively little even of luxury shops.
Very 'no bullshit' people, like Russians in that respect. Also why their electorate couldn't stand Peres so much, very 'European' style of politician. Of course it can have the flipside of extreme rudeness, but at least you'll almost never get any passive-aggressiveness from them, the opposite of the diaspora.Replies: @Dmitry, @Wokechoke
China cannot destroy US bases in Guam and Japan, unless China would use some kind of tactical nuclear weapons against them.
They are thousands of kilometers from China and the bases would have air superiority.
Missiles with conventional warheads can only create quite limited damage, would be limited numbers of missiles that could fire those conventional warheads at such a distance (that would not be so damaging), and those kind of bases are trained to repair such kind of damage to a airport runway almost immediately.
In my view, the best hope for the PRC in any kind of attempt to take over Taiwan is a highly limited military campaign that results in a swift decapitation and occupation. If PRC starts IJN-like with surprise attacks on US military bases around the Pacific, the former is going to get a lot more than it bargained for, even if it can swiftly defeat and occupy Taiwan. It would an American war-party's wet dream.
Contrary to Karlin's take, I think that Russia's failure to defeat and occupy Ukraine quickly lowered the chance of a prospective Chinese attempt on Taiwan in the near future, rather than raise it.
What the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and now the Russian campaign in Ukraine have demonstrated is that it is a quite the tightrope act these days for a great power to engage in a military campaign of invasion and total control of large territories, all without incurring large casualties or inflaming the locals with significant collateral damage. They certainly strengthen the argument that post-modern military operations should be limited in scope and short in duration.Replies: @Blinky Bill, @utu, @Dmitry
The State Department decides when a hard decoupling will start, and Not-your-President Brandon/Blinken are testing the water with Russia, to be extended to China when the cost to global trade is clear. It won't be stopped even if the stock market loses 70% of the value overnight and Soviet-style shortages pop up all over the West - causing the largest famine in human history doesn't stop them from cutting off potential Russian grain exports by severing Russian finance's links to the American-led economic order. Good luck.Replies: @A123, @A123
Addendum:
Here is a Christian Populist demonstrating the total lack of influence wielded by Not-The-President Biden’s regime: (1)
Serious leaders are equally dismissive of the heir apparent.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/03/10/during-presser-poland-president-andrzej-duda-politely-scolds-secretary-blinken-for-making-up-green-light-fighter-jet-story/
On the front we should see the impact of 17,000 anti-tank weapons and several hundreds of Stingers delivered in last week and a new batch of drones from Turkey that was brought to Polish-Ukrainian border two days ago.
Ukrainian propaganda should emphasize battlefield successes more for continued military support rather than Russian atrocities.
The MiG-29 debacle demonstrated that the US does not have what it takes when after publicly egging Poland on to transfer the MiGs to Ukraine it got cold feet when the ball was in its court.
Sanctions are too weak. Germany does everything to do nothing.
Zelensky is right that no-fly zone should be imposed. In the game of nuclear chicken you can't be a chicken by refusing even to enter the game.Replies: @Rich, @Dmitry, @Seaghan, @Veteran of the Memic Wars
Although those are not 17,000 weapons which can destroy a tank. More numerous of those 17,000 weapons going to Ukraine are AT4 and M72 LAW.
AT4 and M72 LAW can be used to destroy things like BMD and BMP. They would probably not be able to destroy tanks regularly, as they are very small weapons.
–
Great Britain has given to Ukraine 3615 NLAW, which can destroy any tanks. Ukraine also has received probably a lot of Javelins.
Ukrainians have also some number of domestically designed anti-tank laser guided missiles “Skif” ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skif_(ATGM) ). They have released about a dozen videos showing they are using allegedly this Ukrainian anti-tank missile.
How would you (or the regular American people) like it if the Mexican parts of the USA were given special autonomous status and given the right to veto national policies that they didn't like? One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:
http://d39raawggeifpx.cloudfront.net/styles/16_9_desktop/s3/articleimages/bnePeople_Ukraine_Vadim_Rabinovich__For_LIfe_political_party_leader_wiki.jpg_7_Cropped.jpgReplies: @iffen, @iffen, @Wokechoke
Sometimes if you don’t take the half of the loaf you starve.
That’s one thing I’ve always like about Israel, and Israelis in general.
Very ‘no bullshit’ people, like Russians in that respect. Also why their electorate couldn’t stand Peres so much, very ‘European’ style of politician. Of course it can have the flipside of extreme rudeness, but at least you’ll almost never get any passive-aggressiveness from them, the opposite of the diaspora.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK03rbc-eZQ It is one of the reasons why Netanyahu was not popular with secular Ashkenazi elite, as they seemed to break some dying historical taboo against Western materialism
But if numbers were a significant factor, the much larger Near Eastern empires would have been much more culturally influential, and that tiny peninsula jutting out of the Western half of Asia would not have been the greatest cultural influencer in the history of the world :)
As for the early Christians, they achieved dominance on a timescale far too small for fertility patterns to play a significant role - assuming they even did have better fertility.
I am starting to read an interesting book called "The Patient Ferment" about the early Christians and how they spread - the thesis of the book is that the early Christians lived in a visibly more appealing way - they were, at least at first, really more loving, harmonious, kind, cheerful than their pagan neighbors, who at that late date in antiquity were often very corrupted in their personal and sexual lives, and who had lost their zest for life and were attached to uninspiring philosophies of "consolation", such as Stoicism and Epicureanism that were about reducing pain rather than living joyously.
That being said, I'm not suggesting there is some kind of absolute division between spirit and the physical - in fact the two are closely interlinked.
Spiritual health and physical health and flourishing go hand in hand! And one of the first indicators of a corrupt or dying spirituality is physical breakdown, as we are seeing today.
However, the relationship is one that is "non-obvious", in that prioritizing physical survival as the materialist does actually makes one less good at surviving long term - and making power and wealth your priority, likewise, makes flourishing and ultimate survival less certain.
Because as the oldest and truest spiritual adage has it - you must give up your life to save it.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird
We are tempted to make a modern comparison between Italy (60 million) and Greece (10 million), but the germane ancient comparison is that the Greeks had a lot of colonies, spread around the Med, including ones in Italy. Whereas, the early Romans were more or less one city-state or small kingdom, surrounded by various groups that spoke different languages, like the Samnites and Etruscans.
Part of it is geography. In the New World, the Atlantic-facing Euro nations were the influential ones. But part of it may be that the Greeks were militarily dominant in their time. (not necessarily a pure reflection of numbers, like how the German tribes beat Rome, or how Rome beat its early neighbors)
I didn’t mean to downplay the memetic spread of Christianity. I believe that was important in capturing the elite. Though, I do think that it was partly memetic and partly because it encouraged adaptive behavior that increased TFR among its adherents. My impression is that paganism didn’t vanish overnight, but actually took hundreds of years to vanish, in the places that converted, which is why many quaint traditions survive in parts of Europe.
I agree with much of the rest of your comment. What we are seeing today is the mimetic idea of wokeness spread, which is as “contagious” as early Christianity, but which encourages non-adaptive behaviors, unlike early Christianity.
That you're neither woke nor patronized by it clouds your views.
Rich wokes have a low divorce rate & high tfr.
AaronB believes in Greek dominance because Jews are gay. A lot of the Greek stuff is 19th C Euro larping.
- Great Britain has given to Ukraine 3615 NLAW, which can destroy any tanks. Ukraine also has received probably a lot of Javelins.
Ukrainians have also some number of domestically designed anti-tank laser guided missiles "Skif" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skif_(ATGM) ). They have released about a dozen videos showing they are using allegedly this Ukrainian anti-tank missile. https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/t8yehx/this_is_how_actually_russian_columns_are_being/Replies: @songbird, @Wokechoke
These redit embeds are the worst, IMO, because they often automatically play, when you scroll (at least for me.) Ron should probably change his code to ban them or hide them, as I heavily suspect them of destabilizing these threads even more, pound for pound than the Twitter embeds.
That’s why the return of Donbass to Ukraine was never feasible, even by a successful Operation Storm.
How would you (or the regular American people) like it if the Mexican parts of the USA were given special autonomous status and given the right to veto national policies that they didn't like? One of the two main pro-Russian politicians in Ukraine, Vadim Rabinovich, is Jewish:
http://d39raawggeifpx.cloudfront.net/styles/16_9_desktop/s3/articleimages/bnePeople_Ukraine_Vadim_Rabinovich__For_LIfe_political_party_leader_wiki.jpg_7_Cropped.jpgReplies: @iffen, @iffen, @Wokechoke
Blacks in the US pick the Democratic nominee. It it quite an extraordinary power.
- Great Britain has given to Ukraine 3615 NLAW, which can destroy any tanks. Ukraine also has received probably a lot of Javelins.
Ukrainians have also some number of domestically designed anti-tank laser guided missiles "Skif" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skif_(ATGM) ). They have released about a dozen videos showing they are using allegedly this Ukrainian anti-tank missile. https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/t8yehx/this_is_how_actually_russian_columns_are_being/Replies: @songbird, @Wokechoke
Let them eat Anti Tank weaponry!
inflame both American and Japanese populations
To be fair, this from Japan Times the other day,
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2022/03/07/commentary/japan-commentary/japan-china-unstable-relationship/
I’ve looked deeply into the Second Sino-Japanese War and take a nuanced view*, but an article about Sino-Japanese relationship that does not mention it at all, and simply refers to “end of World War II”, is fairly material revisionism**.
From our own John Derbyshire:
Even in US textbooks, the First Sino-Japanese War is usually characterized as the nascent move of Japanese imperialism culminating to invasion of China in 1937 and Pearl Harbor. Whereas now Derbs calls it “China surrendered Taiwan to Japan”.
It was Karlin I believe, who suggested that in a decade or so, Western MSM will have fully whitewashed Nazi war crimes against USSR, and Japanese war crimes against China. The latter I’m pretty sure is well on its way.
You can imagine how inflammatory this whitewashing could be to PRC Chinese (the Taiwanese may not care so much). The CCP rather, I think has been restrained, from Global Times: Exclusive: Beijing 2022 a ‘catalyst’ for Japan-China friendship. Needless to say I hope it remains the case.
*It in fact have many parallels to the Russo-Ukrainian War in which the aggressor did not lack decent intentions and whose side should be heard; and which external parties, Soviets and the West, had significant roles.
**The author, Anami Usuke 阿南友亮 would have special appreciation for “end of World War II in August 1945” for it meant for him that his grandfather, War Minister Anami Korechika 阿南惟幾 followed the emperor’s order to surrender, stopped the palace coup, and committed seppuku. So maybe there are complex reasons for his obfuscation.
Here is where the Russians were earlier today:
https://i.imgur.com/UqBPudc.jpg
As you can see, the city was far from surrounded.
I spoke to my cousin who lives in the city. Her grocery store was full today, she bought some meat, bread and even pet food. So yes, things are going into the city, there is not yet a siege. Soldiers are also coming in. Her neighborhood is quiet, though just in case she sleeps in the corridor, away from windows.
OTOH Bucha (a NW suburb) where I also have cousins is a nightmare. Most got out after the early battles but there is one couple there being used as human shields by the Russians. We lost touch for a few days but were able to make contact yesterday. No safe way out. It is a nightmare. Any further evidence of this supposed land attack? This supposedly happened March 7 and then not a trace of this attack upon the Kremenchuk bridge. Looks like it did not occur.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Dmitry
I will write my post about a blockade of Kiev below the MORE tag as I will add some Tweets.
Do you mean a full blockade of Kiev or blockade of roads?
Blockade of the city, to prevent people walking across, with full “cordon” would require 90 battalion tactical groups.
Currently, they are driving groups of tanks on the roads to Kiev. They are staying only on roads. This is the Northern roads are blockaded, not the land.
This convoy has driven to North East city near Kiev, then returns after artillery.
If they had continued to drive further, there would be kilometers of forest next to roads before entering Kiev, where they could be target of infantry with panzerfaust, etc. So, who knows what the mission is? Reconnaissance?
Strangely, this convoy includes a TOS-1 which would create such a large explosion to destroy the convoy, if it would be hit. Yet they added this TOS-1 to mix along with the tanks.
It also include T72A which was constructed in 1970s Nizhny Tagil.
So, these convoys driving near to Kiev are not showing currently the more modern vehicles.
Although, in terms of the protection, the old T-72 is at least an improvement from those BMDs going for suicide drives in the early days.
If the Canadian truckers had the gear theyd have defeated Trudeau for example.
Kiev will starve.Replies: @David Davenport, @Mr. Hack
What does - mildly - annoy me is what seems to me the slimy and trashy way they go about it. But that's more or less how they do everything.
It's possible to support Russia, while respecting Ukraine.
Honestly, I can't see how Putin's Russia represents something better than Woke Materialism - moreover, I think Russia is increasingly a materialistic culture like the West.
And I agree that Ukraine allying with the Woke West is a serious spiritual danger - but I have a feeling they will weather it.Replies: @Justvisiting, @Barbarossa
We Americans may be suffering from “grass is greener” syndrome, but American politics, society and culture are going into the toilet at a very rapid speed–and we would not wish that on anyone–and certainly would not want to fight to spread it to other lands or even to preserve it.
Reading the US Constitution these days is enough to make an adult cry–almost nothing in the document represents the facts on the ground.
I first started travelling 21 years ago. Back then, some countries really were different, and felt very different. India, Thailand, Cambodia. We used to say travel could be a form of time-travel.
That's not the case anymore, or increasingly not. Thailand used to be known as the land of smiles, and used to have a mellow, gracious Buddhist culture. Today, it's people are visibly grumpy and unhappy, and smile less than anywhere in America. Modernity has taken it's toll.
This isn't a cultural issue that one can escape by turning to a different culture. It is modernity itself, and anywhere that has embraced modernity - which is everywhere - is affected.
It's tempting to think that Russia or China or some other place has escaped the hollowing out of modernity, but it's increasingly clear that no one has. You're just getting different flavors.
Currently, they are driving groups of tanks on the roads to Kiev. They are staying only on roads. This is the Northern roads are blockaded, not the land. This convoy has driven to North East city near Kiev, then returns after artillery.
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1501873146818969610If they had continued to drive further, there would be kilometers of forest next to roads before entering Kiev, where they could be target of infantry with panzerfaust, etc. So, who knows what the mission is? Reconnaissance? Strangely, this convoy includes a TOS-1 which would create such a large explosion to destroy the convoy, if it would be hit. Yet they added this TOS-1 to mix along with the tanks. It also include T72A which was constructed in 1970s Nizhny Tagil. https://twitter.com/raging545/status/1501860337691377667
So, these convoys driving near to Kiev are not showing currently the more modern vehicles. Although, in terms of the protection, the old T-72 is at least an improvement from those BMDs going for suicide drives in the early days.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke
All the Russians have to do is sit tanks at the highway/freeway/junctions set up drones and interdict incoming traffic with artillery.
If the Canadian truckers had the gear theyd have defeated Trudeau for example.
Kiev will starve.
But the Russians don't have many drones.
sit tanks at the highway/freeway/junctions ...
Easy targets to find, sitting ducks for Ukrainian drones.Replies: @Wokechoke
https://youtu.be/s0km_4kOeI0Replies: @Wokechoke
Everyone rational expects Not-The-President Biden's directives to be rapidly & 100% reversed. His puppeteers lack the power to do much of anything. They could not even arrange a few MiG's for Ukraine. If the CCP Elites start a unilateral decoupling, Xi will deliver the largest famine in human history to China's workers. Ukraine is likely to have one or more poor harvests due to combat operations. Russia cannot supply all of the calories that China is currently importing from America.
PEACE 😇Replies: @Yellowface Anon
CCP is planning for more autarky as preparation for eventual American hostility – and with even that, top nationalists are warning about premature decoupling: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3161281/china-should-stop-us-decoupling-any-cost-even-humiliation
No one decides upon decoupling now because it will be a sectoral cascade event with a poorly recognized starting point. I singled out Russian sanctions as a possible starting point. If China hard decoupled, they could immediately run full trains with grain from Russia at rock-bottom prices – no longer any unilateral sanctions to appease. Servicing China will be enough for Russia’s grain exports.
Brandon’s handlers have all the power to manage things, and when it’s Trump’s handlers’ turn again, they will keep the parts suiting their agenda and shelve the rest. No total reversal of directives relating to foreign policy. They hold back MiGs because Putin will nuke wherever airport they are transferred in Poland, which will trigger NAT Article 5 and start WWIII proper. They have decided not to escalate to the level of all-out military confrontation.
No peace for you.
Why do you believe that the handlers who accidentally started run away inflation are "all powerful"? To Main Street Americans they look like a joke, though a dangerous one. Which is good thinking. Even if the CCP could obtain 100% of Russia's food exports they would still have a massive shortfall if they received no calories from the U.S.
PEACE 😇
What does - mildly - annoy me is what seems to me the slimy and trashy way they go about it. But that's more or less how they do everything.
It's possible to support Russia, while respecting Ukraine.
Honestly, I can't see how Putin's Russia represents something better than Woke Materialism - moreover, I think Russia is increasingly a materialistic culture like the West.
And I agree that Ukraine allying with the Woke West is a serious spiritual danger - but I have a feeling they will weather it.Replies: @Justvisiting, @Barbarossa
I have some friends who are Russian emigres. They were children when they came over to escape the chaos of the 90’s. They are actually quite interested in practicing traditional Russian culture. They built a sauna which they use religiously, cook many traditional Russian dishes, teach their children Russian etc.
It’s quite distressing when they go back to Russia to see family because so many of them want to be hyper-Americanized. My friends give them a hard time because they are more traditional in America than the Russians who are actually in Russia.
My friends certainly were very Americanized for a time since their parents encouraged assimilation. They partied and imbibed pop culture and materialism, but ultimately found it deeply lacking. They saw the shallow flip side to the glittering coin of materialism.
Their Russian family back in the homeland only sees the glittering reflection of material aspiration that Hollywood reflects. They are taken in by the image of breezy convenience, sexiness, and alluring excess. They are taken in by the sales pitch.
Sometimes one only realizes what one has when it’s gone, and it takes much longer to build something back than it takes to throw it away.
The problem is this very same culture - modernity - is really taking off everywhere in the world that is even semi-developed. It's a global phenomenon now, and will have to be overcome everywhere. There is a theory that modernity was a necessary part of our spiritual evolution as a species - that we had to taste the emptiness of a life based entirely on materialism, the pain of such a life, to return to a fuller and richer way of living and truly appreciate it better.
Tradition, once dismantled, will be hard to build back - but it will be rebuilt on a renewed connection to nature, which is what traditional cultures are at their best, attempts to live in conformity to nature.
I think human cultures have a tendency to drift too far from nature, to become corrupt and artificial, and need constant return and revitalization from the Source.
Very 'no bullshit' people, like Russians in that respect. Also why their electorate couldn't stand Peres so much, very 'European' style of politician. Of course it can have the flipside of extreme rudeness, but at least you'll almost never get any passive-aggressiveness from them, the opposite of the diaspora.Replies: @Dmitry, @Wokechoke
There is also pretending to avoid too much luxury, because publicly Israel is still supposed to have a quasi-socialist, self-sacrificing mentality, despite living nowadays (since the 1990s) in a more neoliberal society.
–
Israeli bourgeoisie are still supposed to drive small modest cars (this might be slowly changing).
Millionaires are supposed to drive Hyundai. Cultural pressure is still to try to pretend to be poorer than you are. People are still supposed to enjoy wearing shabby clothes. Israelis really like to be sit on the floor on the road (like Indians?), and don’t seem to care making trousers dirty with the streetdust.
They are supposed to ignore personal appearances. Girls should be more masculine, not obsessing about beauty, just wearing comfortable but not formal clothes.
Why Israeli people sit their on ass in the middle of the road, is some kind of secret of their culture. It’s not my imagination, but YouTubers are talking about it as well. (https://youtu.be/6OO9ohgDWpI?t=118)
But I’m guessing this is mostly cultural legacy of the 1950s austerity, kibbutz, pioneer youth groups, universal military conscription, etc. The cultural programming is that people should not be fussy about getting street dust on their clothes.
I don’t see how the pretension of this culture can survive though. Israel is already a situation where the cultural superstructure will be shifting to match the economic base of neoliberal capitalism.
Netanyahu and his wife tried to rebel against the fake Israeli socialist attitude, to embrace more upper class neoliberal aesthetics and lifestyle, like to smoke luxury cigars, to drink expensive wines, to give Israeli citizenship to his wealthy friends like Australian oligarch James Packer.
Also made Netanyahu unpopular with the secular Ashkenazim, was his wife’s unembarrassed materialism.
In later years of Netanyahu rule in Israel, Netanyahu’s wife was complaining about their Prime Minister house, because it was too shabby for her. At the same time they invite people like Trump or Putin, or famous oligarchs, to drink tea in their shabby Prime Minister house.
In a cause célèbre, she made a television section, about how shabby her house was, inviting interior designers to criticize it. It looks like a kind of normal students’ house, not so bad.
It is one of the reasons why Netanyahu was not popular with secular Ashkenazi elite, as they seemed to break some dying historical taboo against Western materialism
Very 'no bullshit' people, like Russians in that respect. Also why their electorate couldn't stand Peres so much, very 'European' style of politician. Of course it can have the flipside of extreme rudeness, but at least you'll almost never get any passive-aggressiveness from them, the opposite of the diaspora.Replies: @Dmitry, @Wokechoke
You remind me of Yekoumian in Black Mischief.
… and NATO is entirely non-aggressive to you.
?
Actually, the lesson for China should've been pretty straight forward. It is to make preparations, more preparations. And if it is made to align with general development instead of a bunker attitude, then it should be settled. The other parties can do not much at all.Replies: @Yellowface Anon
Far more preparations, and knocking the priority of military reunification down to a very low place. Diplomatically nudging things and winning hearts and minds in Taiwan have been the strategy since 1992 and there is nothing that will change this direction, save American blunders that force China pay the cost before a potential attack (e.g. broad sanctions like Russia) or Taiwanese provocations.
They have earned their glory, though, and they don't need me to give it to them.
One of the creepier things I'm seeing on the alt right is this attempt to deny the Ukrainians their heroism and sacrifice, and assure them that they are merely pathetic children who can't possibly know their own minds, and they, American alt righters, know much better that Ukrainians are being manipulated, and their chosen leader who they've rallied around and been inspired by, is actually manipulating them etc etc.
I mean, it's ok to support Russia - not really, you'd have to be pretty cretinous and dumb, but I can see some kind of retarded right wing argument of the kind that Putin represents an attractive alternative to Global Liberalism etc that we would all prefer to live in lol.
Deluded, but ok, some people can't help being retarded (and as someone who deeply wants to see the current Woke Materialism replaced by a much better spiritual vision, if Putin is your more appealing alternative than you have a serious, serious, serious PR problem - and not just a PR problem, but a philosophical problem lol).
But why do the alt righters always do the ignoble and low-class trashy thing - why are their moral instincts always so reliably trashy - when it comes to how they talk about Ukrainians dying for their beliefs.
I mean, a little self-overcoming, a little respect for your enemy, is actually noble.Replies: @Justvisiting, @songbird, @Coconuts
Bravery is bravery regardless of whether it is praised, ignored, or denounced.
But praise amounts to social rhetoric. It is meant to encourage outcomes, or to gain status by riding someone’s coattails. People called Islamic terrorists “cowards”, not because they believed that, but because it would be socially malign or imprudent to praise them.
We must remember that rhetoric leads to policy, else why would policy-makers (many very odious people) be full of praise for this abstract spiritual quality called “bravery?” Who amongst these pols praising Ukrainian sacrifice would have praised the men of the Easter Rising, if it happened today? I’ll answer: none because it would be against their goals and their masters.
Thank goodness these Roman softies treated Christians with kid gloves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_the_Roman_Empire#
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diocletianic_Persecution
Silviosilver exaggerates, there were real persecutions of Christians and their position was frequently precarious during the first three centuries, but it wasn't non-stop on the level of Diocletian's persecution either.Replies: @silviosilver
If the Canadian truckers had the gear theyd have defeated Trudeau for example.
Kiev will starve.Replies: @David Davenport, @Mr. Hack
All the Russians have to do is sit tanks at the highway/freeway/junctions set up drones
But the Russians don’t have many drones.
sit tanks at the highway/freeway/junctions …
Easy targets to find, sitting ducks for Ukrainian drones.
But the Russians don't have many drones.
sit tanks at the highway/freeway/junctions ...
Easy targets to find, sitting ducks for Ukrainian drones.Replies: @Wokechoke
Ah but they do theirs are like DIVEBOMBERS. Quite interesting design. They loiter then lock onto a target and plunge in. 500lb warheads. Ao. They also have Kornets with a range of around 3,000 yards.
But praise amounts to social rhetoric. It is meant to encourage outcomes, or to gain status by riding someone's coattails. People called Islamic terrorists "cowards", not because they believed that, but because it would be socially malign or imprudent to praise them.
We must remember that rhetoric leads to policy, else why would policy-makers (many very odious people) be full of praise for this abstract spiritual quality called "bravery?" Who amongst these pols praising Ukrainian sacrifice would have praised the men of the Easter Rising, if it happened today? I'll answer: none because it would be against their goals and their masters.Replies: @AaronB
I understand all that that – but those are all merely “modern ideas”.
Modernity values “efficiency” above all, and praising an enemy isn’t the most efficient path to victory, so we do not affirm any higher moral values.
But there are much more important spiritual values involved. Older cultures would absolutely praise bravery in an enemy – medieval fighters would show the most elaborate courtesy and respect to their foes.
In fact, one is distinguished by having a brave foe. But in modern times, our enemies must always be cowardly and evil. This diminishes us.
By disconnecting ourselves from higher values in this fashion, and affirming efficiency instead, we diminish ourselves and make ourselves smaller. This is not nothing – it is a step on a path that ultimately leads to collapse in higher values, i.e, “modernity”.
Respecting an enemy manifests a higher, more comprehensive moral and spiritual vision, and affirms ourselves as anchored in higher values, not mere selfishness – this ultimately increases our self-respect, our morale and motivation, our sense of not merely being selfish and self-centered but serving a “higher power”, which all leads to a healthy culture and human flourishing.
Spiritual health is essential for human flourishing, and requires us to serve a “higher power”, and not merely our petty selves. It is our “petty selves” that wants to humiliate an enemy.
In the recent Israeli war in Gaza, Palestinians committed some very brave – but doomed – actions that earned them the praise of Israeli generals and commanders. They did not small-mindedly deny their enemy the admiration they had earned.
The Arab and Muslim enemies of Israel have not to my knowledge yet been able to express praise for Israeli bravery – although I may be wrong about this – but one sees that their culture is not flourishing.
As for the 9/11 terrorists, they attacked civilians, not opposing warriors – the weakest link – and their action was knowingly suicidal. These two factors detract heavily from any claim to moral admiration. I don’t think brave is the correct word for reckless suicide, but on the plus side one might admire their dedication to their cause and willingness to die for it. Even here, it’s good to recognize what is worthy of admiration.
Anyways, if we are to overcome modernity and recover spiritual, moral, and ultimately physical health, we will have to get past these merely modern ideas that all center around efficiency, and recover a mindset in which affirming higher values takes precedence, and where the seemingly “irrational” may actually be obeying a deeper rationality.
Modernity is at bottom superficial and stops at the merely obvious – the physical, the material, the fact. But there is a deeper law that we must recover – we cannot anymore remain stupidly superficial like this.
Maybe, it is inherently harder in modern times. First of all, we are broadly at peace. Secondly, because the conflicts that we fight tend to be asymmetric. In the first Gulf War, Iraqis surrendered to spotting drones used by battleships (used in WW2 but refurbished) ten miles away. And people who don't surrender, tend to take cover, to plant IEDs because it would be suicidal to engage on a frontline. Not a lot, practically nothing (maybe the Chinese and Indians in the Himalayas?) is man-to-man.
But there is another side to it too. As our society has become more feminized, the word "hero" has become debased. Whereas, before men were called heroes for rushing into burning buildings. Kids are called heroes for dialing 911. Maybe, those stories are necessary to popularize the service and keep in people's minds? But I think it also applies to other things. Rather than being stinting with praise, sometimes I think we are too profligate.Replies: @AaronB, @Barbarossa
It seems to me that deriding the worth of your foe speaks to a certain inadequacy in your own societal self-conception. Insecurity in one's own position makes it necessary to dehumanize and minimize the worth of opposition.
In pre-modern times we didn't have such existential doubts about the virtue of our cause. The Roman vs. Carthaginian wars were justified by the very fact that your culture and traditions, ancestors, and family demanded that you prevail. The deepest loyalties cried from the very soil to urge one on. Nowadays, those cultural anchors are all gone, replaced by empty propaganda and derision.Replies: @AP, @AaronB, @Yahya
Yes. A terrible thing is that most of the Ukrainian public still wants Donbas back.
Currently, they are driving groups of tanks on the roads to Kiev. They are staying only on roads. This is the Northern roads are blockaded, not the land. This convoy has driven to North East city near Kiev, then returns after artillery.
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1501873146818969610If they had continued to drive further, there would be kilometers of forest next to roads before entering Kiev, where they could be target of infantry with panzerfaust, etc. So, who knows what the mission is? Reconnaissance? Strangely, this convoy includes a TOS-1 which would create such a large explosion to destroy the convoy, if it would be hit. Yet they added this TOS-1 to mix along with the tanks. It also include T72A which was constructed in 1970s Nizhny Tagil. https://twitter.com/raging545/status/1501860337691377667
So, these convoys driving near to Kiev are not showing currently the more modern vehicles. Although, in terms of the protection, the old T-72 is at least an improvement from those BMDs going for suicide drives in the early days.Replies: @Wokechoke, @Wokechoke
Yasnohorodka is now occupied by 3 BTG. Check the villages around that area now.
That’s really not correct. They only seem to have that power when the party establishment wants them to have it and uses them for that purpose. There were used in that way to have Biden defeat Sanders. You’d have a hard time finding any example of their having that power otherwise.
In last several presidential primaries, there were definitely some serious moments of ideological and electoral tension between white liberals/Hispanics on the one hand and blacks on the other in the Democratic Party.Replies: @Ron Unz
It's quite distressing when they go back to Russia to see family because so many of them want to be hyper-Americanized. My friends give them a hard time because they are more traditional in America than the Russians who are actually in Russia.
My friends certainly were very Americanized for a time since their parents encouraged assimilation. They partied and imbibed pop culture and materialism, but ultimately found it deeply lacking. They saw the shallow flip side to the glittering coin of materialism.
Their Russian family back in the homeland only sees the glittering reflection of material aspiration that Hollywood reflects. They are taken in by the image of breezy convenience, sexiness, and alluring excess. They are taken in by the sales pitch.
Sometimes one only realizes what one has when it's gone, and it takes much longer to build something back than it takes to throw it away.Replies: @AaronB
I was reading that it’s quite common for immigrants from traditional cultures who have fallen for the shiny allure of America to eventually come to realize the emptiness at the heart of American life, it’s loneliness, it’s materialism.
The problem is this very same culture – modernity – is really taking off everywhere in the world that is even semi-developed. It’s a global phenomenon now, and will have to be overcome everywhere.
There is a theory that modernity was a necessary part of our spiritual evolution as a species – that we had to taste the emptiness of a life based entirely on materialism, the pain of such a life, to return to a fuller and richer way of living and truly appreciate it better.
Tradition, once dismantled, will be hard to build back – but it will be rebuilt on a renewed connection to nature, which is what traditional cultures are at their best, attempts to live in conformity to nature.
I think human cultures have a tendency to drift too far from nature, to become corrupt and artificial, and need constant return and revitalization from the Source.
On the front we should see the impact of 17,000 anti-tank weapons and several hundreds of Stingers delivered in last week and a new batch of drones from Turkey that was brought to Polish-Ukrainian border two days ago.
Ukrainian propaganda should emphasize battlefield successes more for continued military support rather than Russian atrocities.
The MiG-29 debacle demonstrated that the US does not have what it takes when after publicly egging Poland on to transfer the MiGs to Ukraine it got cold feet when the ball was in its court.
Sanctions are too weak. Germany does everything to do nothing.
Zelensky is right that no-fly zone should be imposed. In the game of nuclear chicken you can't be a chicken by refusing even to enter the game.Replies: @Rich, @Dmitry, @Seaghan, @Veteran of the Memic Wars
Speaking of subhuman, aren’t you Polish?
It seems like the dumb Poles, who are the biggest parasites on Western Europe and the EU, are also the biggest Russo-phobic maniacs throughout this whole episode and are obsessed with trying to embroil the whole world in a wider conflict. Freeloading Russia-hating Poles are the cause of most of Europe’s problems.
“Friends get to know each other in trouble, ha ha ha…”
If the Canadian truckers had the gear theyd have defeated Trudeau for example.
Kiev will starve.Replies: @David Davenport, @Mr. Hack
Perhaps, but at some point you’ve got to try to go forward and try to become offensive. Today, Russian tank movements towards Kyiv (26 tanks including missile launchers) resulted in destruction and most of the tanks were either destroyed, captured or had to retreat, 16 miles outside of the capital:
Yeah the Democrats and negroes have a really bizarre love-hate relationship. Biden promised them a black woman and negroes f’n hate Kamala Harris. His whole attitude at that time and many other occasions was like:
what are you going to do about it?
The only people who think Kamala is black are Republicans and media mouths. It will be hilarious if a Real Black Democrat decides to run in 2024, Biden is out, and RBD calls out Harris to her face in a debate. If Trump was a black Democrat he would say something to her like the closest you’ve ever been to black is sucking on it.
Surely, you're not doubting or denying the wholesale bombing of civilian apartment buildings, houses, churches, medical centers, businesses that have been occurring right from the very beginning of this disastrous war?Replies: @Wokechoke, @Veteran of the Memic Wars
You might not be ready for the adults’ table.
Take patients out put fighters in now it’s a legitimate target.
Keep patients in put fighters in who shoot out now it’s a legitimate target.
I am aganostic on the bioweapons. There were 11 sites in Soviet times. The US started to pay to have the stockpiles destroyed in 2005. Some may have been missed, deliberately hidden by Ukrainians. Pharam testing is a big indutry in Ukraine. So some of the labs are still active in pharma.
No way does Ukraine make chemical weapons with ammonia. Russia does. The ammonia plant is in Samara. It is the world's biggest. There was a pipeline to Odessa (maybe Mariupol, I forget) where there was a urea (fertilizer) factory. That was closed in 2014 post war. A new pipeline was built to a place near Taganarog. Ammonia is very energy intensive to make. Ukraine could not make industrial quantities. They couldn't afford the energy. A chemical weapon based on ammonia will be Russian whatever the propaganda claims.Replies: @Mr. Hack
How do you feel overall about the conflict? There are good reasons to favor the underdog in this one, Remember Rocky IV? The underdog had a “Burning Heart” that helped him overcome his much bigger and musclebound Russian superman. Who would have thought??……
Even if the steam roller starts to move again (when the mud dries?) and wins by sheer numbers (the time honoured Russia way), the cost will be going up. The Ukrainians know their positions and strategies now. The Ukrainians have very equipment for a very solid infantry defence and a large amount of offensive equipment donated by Russia. As mentioned above, even if all 900,000 members of the Russian military attack they will just impede each other for the time being.
They can win militarily in NovoRossiya at enormous cost. Will it be enough to keep Putin in office? Does Putin matter? Putin is the head of an Orthodox fascist cult with at least 1.5m followers: the siloviki and senior officers. Any replacement will still be from this cult. They could brood on this for 25 years rather than change tack. China won't support them once they run out of money. Economically, Russia will live in the 1980s at best.
Russian will not wholly win. Ukraine will not wholly lose. EU growth will be blocked. The US and China will be the big winners. India will not invade Kashmir. China will be slower to invade Taiwan than it was. Turkey will be a little winner in Central Asia and Syria.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @sudden death, @Mr. Hack
“Brave” has a positive connotation, and “coward” a negative connotation, so it is understandable why people called them “cowards”, though the meaning doesn’t quite match. I guess there may have been an idea that they were zealots and trading their lives for eternal pleasure, which has a sensual element to it, which is morally suspect, in itself, beyond the great crime of harming innocents.
Good point, I think it also encourages masculinity, in one’s peers and sons, to praise one’s foe.
Maybe, it is inherently harder in modern times. First of all, we are broadly at peace. Secondly, because the conflicts that we fight tend to be asymmetric. In the first Gulf War, Iraqis surrendered to spotting drones used by battleships (used in WW2 but refurbished) ten miles away. And people who don’t surrender, tend to take cover, to plant IEDs because it would be suicidal to engage on a frontline. Not a lot, practically nothing (maybe the Chinese and Indians in the Himalayas?) is man-to-man.
But there is another side to it too. As our society has become more feminized, the word “hero” has become debased. Whereas, before men were called heroes for rushing into burning buildings. Kids are called heroes for dialing 911. Maybe, those stories are necessary to popularize the service and keep in people’s minds? But I think it also applies to other things. Rather than being stinting with praise, sometimes I think we are too profligate.
But I think such claims always end up being premature. In the 2006 war in Lebanon, the Israeli army had been transitioning to a "post-heroic" battle doctrine that prioritized technology and especially the air force, and ground forces were neglected, poorly trained, poorly equipped, and poorly motivated - expected to play a marginal role.
It didn't work. As the war wore on disastrously, it was gradually discovered that nothing but good old fashioned heroism on the part of infantry would do the trick.
We are certainly trying to transition to a dehumanized society of mere technique, where human qualities play no significant role - but I don't think this will ever truly happen. Each step in this direction, makes us sicker, and closer to collapse, and is thus self defeating.
I am sure in this war there are many examples of exemplary personal bravery on both sides.
Sure, the term heroism has become greatly debased, and it would be worthwhile to restore robust standards for that word.
But the really important thing is to restore all these "old notions" that modernity has abandoned in it's infinite wisdom. I don't mean simply returning to tradition - I don't think it's possible to ever go back, because we're different now. But instead of just discarding traditional concepts, as we've done, we can reexamine them, and revitalize them, by holding them up to the light of Nature and truth.Replies: @songbird
While honor was a foundational concept through practically all of civilization (even when it was ignored) it is completely absent today. It has practically become an embarrassment to bring it up.
If one brings up concepts of honor in any conversation (at least in my experience) one is greeted by confusion, as if the concept is so archaic and foreign that they don't know what to do with it. In other words, we just don't think in those terms anymore.
As AaronB is saying, and I think our Sikh commenters would concur, a world without honor is a spiritually sick world of well armed worms blasting away at each other.Replies: @silviosilver
On the front we should see the impact of 17,000 anti-tank weapons and several hundreds of Stingers delivered in last week and a new batch of drones from Turkey that was brought to Polish-Ukrainian border two days ago.
Ukrainian propaganda should emphasize battlefield successes more for continued military support rather than Russian atrocities.
The MiG-29 debacle demonstrated that the US does not have what it takes when after publicly egging Poland on to transfer the MiGs to Ukraine it got cold feet when the ball was in its court.
Sanctions are too weak. Germany does everything to do nothing.
Zelensky is right that no-fly zone should be imposed. In the game of nuclear chicken you can't be a chicken by refusing even to enter the game.Replies: @Rich, @Dmitry, @Seaghan, @Veteran of the Memic Wars
Retard-tier. Russian anti-aircraft systems would have a field day picking NATO planes out of the sky from just outside the Ukrainian borders. And rightly so.
Russians would be right to sink a few carrier groups while they were at it.
Western media plays deliberately obtuse, keeps echoing this retarded “no fly zone” shit from the Ukrainians, and I guess we can add you to the list. All retards. Fuck you, go sign up and fight yourself, we don’t want to fight a nuclear war to save one kleptocracy from another, kthxbye.
Rocky IV had a very good soundtrack. I also like “Hearts on Fire” and “No Easy Way Out.”
If I were Putin and US or NATO genuinely tried that “no fly” shit in Ukraine – all-in, not toe in water – I’d nuke Kiev. I’d give ’em 24 hours warning to pack their shit up and go, and then I’d nuke Kiev if they refused.
Maybe, it is inherently harder in modern times. First of all, we are broadly at peace. Secondly, because the conflicts that we fight tend to be asymmetric. In the first Gulf War, Iraqis surrendered to spotting drones used by battleships (used in WW2 but refurbished) ten miles away. And people who don't surrender, tend to take cover, to plant IEDs because it would be suicidal to engage on a frontline. Not a lot, practically nothing (maybe the Chinese and Indians in the Himalayas?) is man-to-man.
But there is another side to it too. As our society has become more feminized, the word "hero" has become debased. Whereas, before men were called heroes for rushing into burning buildings. Kids are called heroes for dialing 911. Maybe, those stories are necessary to popularize the service and keep in people's minds? But I think it also applies to other things. Rather than being stinting with praise, sometimes I think we are too profligate.Replies: @AaronB, @Barbarossa
Yes, it does seem that the age of “heroic” warfare has passed and been replaced by the age of mere military technique.
But I think such claims always end up being premature. In the 2006 war in Lebanon, the Israeli army had been transitioning to a “post-heroic” battle doctrine that prioritized technology and especially the air force, and ground forces were neglected, poorly trained, poorly equipped, and poorly motivated – expected to play a marginal role.
It didn’t work. As the war wore on disastrously, it was gradually discovered that nothing but good old fashioned heroism on the part of infantry would do the trick.
We are certainly trying to transition to a dehumanized society of mere technique, where human qualities play no significant role – but I don’t think this will ever truly happen. Each step in this direction, makes us sicker, and closer to collapse, and is thus self defeating.
I am sure in this war there are many examples of exemplary personal bravery on both sides.
Sure, the term heroism has become greatly debased, and it would be worthwhile to restore robust standards for that word.
But the really important thing is to restore all these “old notions” that modernity has abandoned in it’s infinite wisdom. I don’t mean simply returning to tradition – I don’t think it’s possible to ever go back, because we’re different now. But instead of just discarding traditional concepts, as we’ve done, we can reexamine them, and revitalize them, by holding them up to the light of Nature and truth.
I guess that would be a pretty far cry from medieval times, when the elite were martial families, that had their own hereditary traditions, and which in Ireland (and I suppose other places?) had their own battle cries, which often involved shouting the family name, or the name of an old (and common) ancestor.
Reading the US Constitution these days is enough to make an adult cry--almost nothing in the document represents the facts on the ground.Replies: @AaronB
It’s a largely global phenomenon, not limited to America.
I first started travelling 21 years ago. Back then, some countries really were different, and felt very different. India, Thailand, Cambodia. We used to say travel could be a form of time-travel.
That’s not the case anymore, or increasingly not. Thailand used to be known as the land of smiles, and used to have a mellow, gracious Buddhist culture. Today, it’s people are visibly grumpy and unhappy, and smile less than anywhere in America. Modernity has taken it’s toll.
This isn’t a cultural issue that one can escape by turning to a different culture. It is modernity itself, and anywhere that has embraced modernity – which is everywhere – is affected.
It’s tempting to think that Russia or China or some other place has escaped the hollowing out of modernity, but it’s increasingly clear that no one has. You’re just getting different flavors.
Destroy or no, firing on US bases in Guam and Japan would be sheer insanity on the part of the PRC.
In my view, the best hope for the PRC in any kind of attempt to take over Taiwan is a highly limited military campaign that results in a swift decapitation and occupation. If PRC starts IJN-like with surprise attacks on US military bases around the Pacific, the former is going to get a lot more than it bargained for, even if it can swiftly defeat and occupy Taiwan. It would an American war-party’s wet dream.
Contrary to Karlin’s take, I think that Russia’s failure to defeat and occupy Ukraine quickly lowered the chance of a prospective Chinese attempt on Taiwan in the near future, rather than raise it.
What the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and now the Russian campaign in Ukraine have demonstrated is that it is a quite the tightrope act these days for a great power to engage in a military campaign of invasion and total control of large territories, all without incurring large casualties or inflaming the locals with significant collateral damage. They certainly strengthen the argument that post-modern military operations should be limited in scope and short in duration.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT678e-5oRVNQqGw7du2auzdTsJEpqgtu4Jog&usqp.jpg
https://i.redd.it/cnifhz9tvku21.png
https://i.redd.it/cnifhz9tvku21.png
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT678e-5oRVNQqGw7du2auzdTsJEpqgtu4Jog&usqp.jpgReplies: @Blinky Bill
I agree with this in general, but it is also true that blacks have an outsized political influence in the Democratic Party, particularly in regards to presidential primaries, due to the primary scheduling. Even in absence of such scheduling peculiarities, blacks are a significant and a fairly cohesive constituency in the Democratic Party.
In last several presidential primaries, there were definitely some serious moments of ideological and electoral tension between white liberals/Hispanics on the one hand and blacks on the other in the Democratic Party.
Normally, Sanders' wins in the first three races would have made him unstoppable, but since the Democratic establishment and its MSM allies didn't like him, they said otherwise, and since the MSM creates reality, especially among Democrats, that was decisive. There was also all sorts of quasi-cheating in Iowa to suppress Sanders' numbers. The political dynamics is that the Democratic Party elites are mostly Neolibs/Neocons, while rank-and-file Democrats are overwhelmingly opposed to those ideological positions. So the elites need to use all sorts of tricks to stay in control, made easier by their control of the MSM.
Unlike other groups, blacks tend to focus mostly on racial issues, and partly for that reason they're easier for the Democratic elites to manipulate. Black leaders are also generally easier to buy off. Given Biden's track record, there was no logical reason for blacks to support him, but the elites decided he was their best shot at stopping Sanders, so they got several black leaders to endorse him, and the black voters overwhelmingly went along with it.
I can't think of a single time when blacks have gotten their way in the Democratic Party on an issue the elites opposed and cared about. They mostly use blacks and black issues as a camouflage and a distraction, much like all the corporate CEOs support "woke" issues.
So its mostly the Democratic elites vs. the Democratic base, with the blacks used as cannon-fodder by the former.Replies: @Justvisiting, @A123, @Twinkie
In my view, the best hope for the PRC in any kind of attempt to take over Taiwan is a highly limited military campaign that results in a swift decapitation and occupation. If PRC starts IJN-like with surprise attacks on US military bases around the Pacific, the former is going to get a lot more than it bargained for, even if it can swiftly defeat and occupy Taiwan. It would an American war-party's wet dream.
Contrary to Karlin's take, I think that Russia's failure to defeat and occupy Ukraine quickly lowered the chance of a prospective Chinese attempt on Taiwan in the near future, rather than raise it.
What the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and now the Russian campaign in Ukraine have demonstrated is that it is a quite the tightrope act these days for a great power to engage in a military campaign of invasion and total control of large territories, all without incurring large casualties or inflaming the locals with significant collateral damage. They certainly strengthen the argument that post-modern military operations should be limited in scope and short in duration.Replies: @Blinky Bill, @utu, @Dmitry
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNdds9BacAEurOU.jpg
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBZjzn4BQ4BNsT-sjGh8f0vm1mEFen1-1kXw&usqp.jpg
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS1p3hKrh3h29vr-FviofQ31xs-1KDAbzO50Q&usqp.jpgReplies: @Blinky Bill
I came across a very true comment - Putin managed to do what Ukrainian nationalists had failed to do in 30 years - convince even Eastern Ukrainians that Bandera was correct about the Russians.Replies: @sudden death, @utu, @Anatoly Karlin, @Pharmakon, @Twinkie
This is correct. After the events of 2014, unwittingly, Putin became the godfather of present day Ukrainian ultra-nationalism. Now, he is trying to correct this huge mistake of his by becoming the undertaker of Ukrainian ultra-nationalism. The only other person (that I’m aware of) who created or erased nationalities, with a stroke of a pen, is Comrade Stalin.
Be well!
https://youtu.be/s0km_4kOeI0Replies: @Wokechoke
These clips just show the viewers where the Russians have advanced toward. I think that you’ve watched too much American footage of American ops in the Middle East. This is a real war between Europeans. This is the real thing.
In my view, the best hope for the PRC in any kind of attempt to take over Taiwan is a highly limited military campaign that results in a swift decapitation and occupation. If PRC starts IJN-like with surprise attacks on US military bases around the Pacific, the former is going to get a lot more than it bargained for, even if it can swiftly defeat and occupy Taiwan. It would an American war-party's wet dream.
Contrary to Karlin's take, I think that Russia's failure to defeat and occupy Ukraine quickly lowered the chance of a prospective Chinese attempt on Taiwan in the near future, rather than raise it.
What the American wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and now the Russian campaign in Ukraine have demonstrated is that it is a quite the tightrope act these days for a great power to engage in a military campaign of invasion and total control of large territories, all without incurring large casualties or inflaming the locals with significant collateral damage. They certainly strengthen the argument that post-modern military operations should be limited in scope and short in duration.Replies: @Blinky Bill, @utu, @Dmitry
Yes, China will put “unification” with Taiwan on the back burner.
I came across a very true comment - Putin managed to do what Ukrainian nationalists had failed to do in 30 years - convince even Eastern Ukrainians that Bandera was correct about the Russians.Replies: @sudden death, @utu, @Anatoly Karlin, @Pharmakon, @Twinkie
Thanks for the kind words, but I am pretty sure there are some commenters (and definitely readers) who are quite knowledgeable in military affairs.
As I mentioned in another comment, employing military forces in these post-modern days, especially for larger powers, is quite a balancing act that requires a high degree of competence in force projection/operations all the while managing casualty levels and collateral damage and avoiding horrendous headlines, which are almost inevitable and enormously difficult to avoid/cover-up.
I have a few follow-up thoughts:
1. Those who seem excited about further shipments of ATGMs and MANPADs to Ukraine, I think you should temper your expectations. Employing ATGMs in open terrain is to invite a quick death, and they are far more potent if used in relatively close ranges (not even close to the listed maximum ranges) against vehicle columns that enter chokepoints without effective infantry screens. I suspect the Russian military learned its lessons and won’t be giving away easy wins to the Ukrainians employing ATGMs in the future.
2. Similarly, MANPADs become very effective when aircraft are forced to fly low and slow (that’s why transport helicopters are the most perfect targets for MANPADs). Indeed, if the defenders still have a functioning integrated air defense system that can intercept aircraft that fly fast and high, MANPADs can be quite effective. In absence of that, however, the utility of MANPADs declines significantly.
3. One of the biggest differences for the U.S. forces in Desert Storm and OIF was that, in the first war, we had uncontested control of the highways behind the frontlines once the Iraqi military units either retreated or were destroyed whereas, in the second war, the Iraqi troops did not confront our mechanized thrusts, but dispersed and contested the control of the highways by attacking soft targets such as re-supply trucks. Later, of course, various militias and terrorist groups rose up and likewise made traveling along the transportation arteries hazardous. I wonder to what extent this pattern will replicate in Ukraine. It’s one thing to rally around their president while he is alive and functioning and still commands some semblance of a conventional force, but how likely is it that there is for Ukrainians a a) a plan B for widespread guerilla action and b) spontaneous rise of militias that attack the Russian forces?
4. I am watching with great interest in how the Russians intend to enter and control the cities. Urban fighting is very different from fighting on natural terrains. It is much more three-dimensional, the environment is far more chaotic and dirty (once a city is even partly damaged and maintenance/sanitation systems collapse, it becomes incredibly filthy very quickly), and there is substantially higher, almost unavoidable, likelihood of collateral damage and civilian suffering.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War
The comparison is to the Iraqi military's decision to mostly avoid contesting the US military's entry into the country. Its decision to mount an insurgency was wise, given the US tendency to avoid taking the traditional and brutal, but effective, measures to crush insurgencies via large scale exile (e.g. Siberia) or massacre. Whereas the Russians are certainly not averse to such measures, killing hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians during an earlier insurgency just after WWII.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_Insurgent_Army#End_of_UPA_resistance
Bottom line is that it's unclear a Ukrainian insurgency could survive Russian atrocities, which is why its conventional force may need to win outright.Replies: @Twinkie
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT678e-5oRVNQqGw7du2auzdTsJEpqgtu4Jog&usqp.jpg
https://i.redd.it/cnifhz9tvku21.png
https://i.redd.it/cnifhz9tvku21.png
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT678e-5oRVNQqGw7du2auzdTsJEpqgtu4Jog&usqp.jpgReplies: @Blinky Bill
Was anybody doing polls in USA around 1939-40 about attitudes towards Nazi Germany? It seems to me there was no any wholesale unity either, cause racial hierarchy ideology, including Jew hatred at the top, probably was not very repulsive (to put it mildly) at all to significant share of US population then too.
Interesting nuance. But that primary in the South really is decisive and it’s the black electorate doing it every time.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNdds9BacAEurOU.jpg
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBZjzn4BQ4BNsT-sjGh8f0vm1mEFen1-1kXw&usqp.jpg
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS1p3hKrh3h29vr-FviofQ31xs-1KDAbzO50Q&usqp.jpgReplies: @Blinky Bill
Trump’s favorite Taiwan comparison was to point to the tip of one of his Sharpie’s and say, ‘This is Taiwan,’ then point to Resolute [his desk in the Oval Office] and say, ‘This is China’.
It was very much a modern adaptation of the David and Goliath story, for the modern world, wouldn’t you say? And it’s a very good metaphor for the war we have today between Russian and Ukraine. People all over the world are very much impressed with the valiant struggle that the Ukrainians are putting up against this much larger and well equipped adversary. How the 12th round will end up is still open and to be decided.
We were discussing the dramatic “I Claudius” series before this unfortunate war started. I presume that you finally finished watching it, and I’m curious to know what you ended up thinking about it?
I think the best pure underdog story in the series is the first one. I've never been able to wrap my head around how the first Rocky movie seems fairly sophisticated (won oscar) and Stallone wrote it, but he also wrote the rather unsophisticated Expendables movies, which I thought were terrible, and I like action movies. To tell you the truth, so far I have still only seen the first episode. Haven't really watched anything else, with the exception of the first season (very short) of the Mandalorian, which I hate-watched, as a critique of current mass culture. (and I barely finished it)
I did finish that book you recommended though and thought it was quite good. I think it is nearly right up there with The Royal Road to Romance by Richard Halliburton, which is my favorite travel book of all time. It is also kind of uncanny how the story starts and ends in Detroit, and the author is pretty free in the use of his language, as we would consider it now.Replies: @Mr. Hack
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4mVFTR1KrMReplies: @Seaghan
Europeans once surrendered tend to behave. The idea of an Arab style insurgency while tantalising is about as tantalising as the Werewolf idea post Reich. It may remain out of reach.
Ever heard of post-1944 years long anti-Soviet insurgency in Ukraine while having no any direct borders and supplies from the West? All the Soviet nightmares and insecurities about scary banderites are coming exactly from that time, Arab style insurgency is child’s play compared with this.
Don’t forget Estonia.
Remember that, besides the Forest Brothers of Volyn, they also have this phenomenon of Machnovschina in their culture (of course, they were anarcho reds, but just the sheer ability to organize from below and act independently is quite remarkable, and, of course, it is stunning to see a white warlord in the 21st century). They have territorial defense and they're currently in the process of mobilizing more. There are apparently more volunteers than rifles available. But, of course, we're not at that point yet -- the VSU will first go into a counter offensive.
Перемогаемо.
Peace through victory.
Incidentally, I think that Victoria Nuland's disastrous mistake in admitting the existence of those Ukrainian biolabs greatly strengthens the case I've been making that the global Covid outbreak was the result of an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran), as I just pointed out in a short column:
https://www.unz.com/announcement/ukraine-and-biowarfare-conspiracy-theories/
Over the last two years, I've accumulated a massive amount of evidence in favor of my hypothesis and the only argument anyone has ever been able to make on the other side is that even rogue elements of the Trump Administration couldn't possibly have done something so extremely reckless and foolish.
Well, the fact that they apparently set up deadly biowarfare labs right on Russia's border also seems pretty reckless and foolish...Replies: @Wokechoke, @A123, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Blinky Bill
Indeed, the failed blitzkrieg means that the Ukrainians can entrench in the cities. Bomb them, starve them, or Stalingrad them; it won’t look pretty for the Russians
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnMXh4GynP8Replies: @Blinky Bill
I certainly have. Although that was more Galicia than Kharkov, Crimea or Kiev.
Don’t forget Estonia.
Several days old RF field diversionist veteran Strelkov’s short assesment of the offensive operations in Ukraine with English subtitles:
https://youtu.be/0ol803uuerw
The questions are: Can the Russian military achieve that without leveling the cities? Will Putin prefer that option to being perceived as a loser? Will the West resist the mounting public pressure to intervene when the media reports an even worse carnage of civilians?
Another interesting and measured article by Richard Hanania arguing why Russia is most likely to win in the end:
https://www.metaculus.com/notebooks/10226/why-forecasting-war-is-hard/Replies: @sudden death
1. Rome had an epidemic of demonic possession. The Christians were really skilled at exorcising demons.
2. The morals of middle class Romans had begun to imitate the upper classes in terms of drinking and promiscuity. The Christians had exemplary family values. Whether their theology made the greatest sense or not, people wanted to be like them.
The most popular preacher in Houston is Joel Osteen. He is a complete charlatan but he is great at marketing. People go to his church by the thousands because they want to be like Joel Osteen. Stoicism and Empiricism and Neoplatonism and Hermetism may have competed for thinkers, but most of the people were illiterate.Replies: @AaronB
I don’t think it could have just been limited to good family values. No doubt the pagans also had stable families.
It was a whole way of life, not based on competitive aggression, and so very unlike the basic principles of pagan life, and also obviously more joyous and optimistic in a deep sense than offered by the popular pagan philosophies.
Ultimately, by their fruits shall you judge them.
The fact is, there is a sort of “eternal Way” that may be summarized by the Sermon On The Mount, but appears in different forms in all the religions, and that mankind is continually straying from towards self-aggrandizement, but that to follow is the path to deeply rooted flourishing.
Periodically, one needs a “realignment” to bring us back into accord with the Way, after having strayed too far.
We are obviously in such a time today.
The first individuals and small groups who reject the dominant culture and return to the Way, will inevitably attract attention as they live obviously happier and more joyous lives, and flourish in ways that people in the dominant culture don’t – these people will serve as catalysts for change.
The history of early Christianity is an excellent template for this.
Ultimately, no one wants to be miserable – no one looks at Karlin or Chieh and says, wow, they seem so happy I want to be like them lol – or looks at the alt-right and thinks, yeah, these ego-monsters seem so happy and flourishing let me join – but people are afraid and don’t see alternatives.
So at first, small groups and individuals must provide lived evidence of the alternatives, that are seeds. That’s why probably the most important thing any of us can do really is live rightly well, and not necessarily expend much effort “convincing” anyone of anything – argument and discussion can be fun, but lived example is transformative.
Establishment lackeys of dominant culture mislabel it "Trumpist". Most cannot grasp that MAGA is more important than any individual. Some fear it undermines their aspirations for total indoctrination society.
Efforts to crush MAGA are doomed to fail because its goal is transformive... A return to traditional values, hope, & joy.
PEACE 😇Replies: @AaronB
Peace & violence are relative ie higher crime rates among christians & muslims over centuries.
Secularize Paganism & declare temples public goods = take bricks from them freely
https://web.archive.org/web/20160304070043/http://mosmaiorum.org/persecution_list.html
Yahya can cry about being white or peaceful monotheism. In the end, the Sword rules. Pagan or Jew
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Russia really has several options. It looks like LDNR will be fully liberated and the huge UkroNazi units in the cauldrons in the south completely destroyed. Russia could probably also liberate Odessa and the entire Black Sea coast of Ukraine all the way to Transnistria. All the other actions in and around Kharkov and Kiev make sense so as to keep the Ukrainian armed forces occupied and prevent any reinforcement of their units in the south which are facing certain annihilation, even at the cost of some Russian and civilian losses. Once the south has been secured and the UkroNazis in that region destroyed, Russia can decide what to do next: perhaps fight some more to liberate some more territory from the UkroNazis, go for an all out liberation of Kharkov, Kiev and other regions of eastern Ukraine at some greater cost to its own forces, total occupation of Ukraine including Lvov and Galicia at yet greater cost to its forces, or just pull back from Kiev as it did from Tbilisi in Georgia in 2008 but keeping the southern region and cutting off Ukraine’s access to the sea. Also it could combine negotiations for this withdrawal from Kiev with some significant concessions and guarantees from the Ukraine regime. It really has so many options and at a minimum it would have achieved its goal of liberating LDNR and securing its population from Ukrainian threats. Anything else would just be a bonus. How anyone can possibly talk about Russia’s defeat in Ukraine is preposterous. It’s a win all the way, any which way.
I agree with much of the rest of your comment. What we are seeing today is the mimetic idea of wokeness spread, which is as "contagious" as early Christianity, but which encourages non-adaptive behaviors, unlike early Christianity.Replies: @sher singh
Early christianity had its high tfr elites & crazy folk just like wokeness today.
That you’re neither woke nor patronized by it clouds your views.
Rich wokes have a low divorce rate & high tfr.
AaronB believes in Greek dominance because Jews are gay. A lot of the Greek stuff is 19th C Euro larping.
By the metric of the stunning German conquest of France even the sad Russian Airforce is doing alright.
The Luftwaffe lost 1,450 aircraft in the Battle of France. A further 400 were written off. That’s 28% lost and 36% combined lost/damaged. That’s with a campaign considered a classic demonstration of Airsupremacy.
The Strategic Institutes of War Understanding and Atlanticist Obtuseness estimate that the Russian Airforce lost 5% of strength over two weeks. That’s with a failure to achieve mere Air Superiority.
Maybe they should be bombing and strafing harder.
The post about a BTG having a frontage of 1km is insanely retarded.
Infantry disperses because mortars are a thing.
5m is better, and setting up checkpoints isn’t difficult. Rifles can also reach out to ~300m.
5000 men with proper support & shoot to kill orders would be enough for the majority of traffic.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
Looks like quite realistic map atm:
https://i.redd.it/03k7k5mfbnm81.pngReplies: @Wokechoke
The north bank of the lower Dneiper looks promising. Should cut off Dneipropetrovsk given a little time.
Infantry disperses because mortars are a thing.
5m is better, and setting up checkpoints isn't difficult. Rifles can also reach out to ~300m.
5000 men with proper support & shoot to kill orders would be enough for the majority of traffic.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @Wokechoke
They only need to stop vehicles entering the city, with provisions. Not difficult.
They have earned their glory, though, and they don't need me to give it to them.
One of the creepier things I'm seeing on the alt right is this attempt to deny the Ukrainians their heroism and sacrifice, and assure them that they are merely pathetic children who can't possibly know their own minds, and they, American alt righters, know much better that Ukrainians are being manipulated, and their chosen leader who they've rallied around and been inspired by, is actually manipulating them etc etc.
I mean, it's ok to support Russia - not really, you'd have to be pretty cretinous and dumb, but I can see some kind of retarded right wing argument of the kind that Putin represents an attractive alternative to Global Liberalism etc that we would all prefer to live in lol.
Deluded, but ok, some people can't help being retarded (and as someone who deeply wants to see the current Woke Materialism replaced by a much better spiritual vision, if Putin is your more appealing alternative than you have a serious, serious, serious PR problem - and not just a PR problem, but a philosophical problem lol).
But why do the alt righters always do the ignoble and low-class trashy thing - why are their moral instincts always so reliably trashy - when it comes to how they talk about Ukrainians dying for their beliefs.
I mean, a little self-overcoming, a little respect for your enemy, is actually noble.Replies: @Justvisiting, @songbird, @Coconuts
But this is very likely to happen once a cause is ostentatiously adopted by the GAE and Western progressives, the alt-right will tend to crudely counter signal Liberal expressions of moral indignation, outrage and so on.
Outside of the alt-right, one of the sharper British conservative commentators made some interesting comments about the history of the concept of patriotism, drawing parallels between what can be observed in Ukraine and British cultural history, and pointing out that the patriotic and nationalistic feeling probably inspiring Ukrainian resistance is the kind of thing Western progressives otherwise harshly condemn and are constantly trying to deconstruct.
It seems likely that in terms of the structure and form of their political beliefs if not the national content, many Ukrainians resemble the Russians much more than anything from the Anglo world, and within the EU, they are closer to the conservative wing of Polish or Hungarian politics, or AfD or Vox in Spain, the kind of politics identified by progressives as ‘Fascist threats to core EU democratic values’.
This means one of the creepiest things might be the scale and intensity of virtue signalling by the GAE around the conflict, because it likely isn’t motivated by interest in or direct concern for the Ukrainians as such, but because Russia just challenged GAE political/military hegemony in Europe.
As you note, Ukraine itself with it's patriotism and willingness to fight represents something that the right should find highly sympathetic, making this a much more complex situation than any simple crude binary. Honestly my consumption of news in general is severely limited, but just from reading blogs and writers I like I get the impression that you are correct and there is an insane, massive outpouring of demonization of Russians and hysterical anti-Russian sentiment, which is obviously wrong and terrible.
I am sure you are correct that the West is primarily motivated by fury that a power with (seemingly) different values is challenging it's hegemony in a core area, Europe.
In a way, the alt-right and the mainstream are two sides of the same coin.
I would ultimately like to see some genuine "third way" thinking that rejects the Western mainstream while at the same time not falling for political systems and cultures that in different ways are as bad, like Russia or China.
Why is it so difficult for us to have something genuinely intelligent?
When that kind of political thinking starts to seriously emerge we will be making headway towards a new culture - already, some people are discussing how left/right no longer really makes sense anymore.
https://www.eurasiareview.com/11032022-what-russia-desires-oped/
Secularize Paganism & declare temples public goods = take bricks from them freely
https://web.archive.org/web/20160304070043/http://mosmaiorum.org/persecution_list.html
Yahya can cry about being white or peaceful monotheism. In the end, the Sword rules. Pagan or Jew
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹReplies: @silviosilver
Sam Colt rules.
https://youtu.be/kQKrmDLvijoReplies: @sudden death
https://twitter.com/jvalaaa/status/1480780305132781569?s=20
Shock and Disbelief is natural.
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
iirc actually white Southerners were most pro-intervention, which isn’t too surprising given their martial culture and high degree of British ancestry. But of course the South was also the most explicitly racist part of the US then, so the divisions don’t really align with what one would expect given today’s dominant interpretation of WW2.
Antisemitism is in large parts a hate for intellectual and economic elites or maybe for the "economic middlemen". Anti-black racism is quite the opposite: it is a hate for people who are seen as rather poor and economical useless.Replies: @LondonBob
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Triumph_of_faith_by_Eugene_Thirion.jpgReplies: @German_reader
Diocletian’s persecution was really the only determined and somewhat coordinated effort by the Roman state to destroy Christianity, but even it was probably only partially enforced in the Western provinces. Before the 250s persecutions were intermittent and local. Trajan ordered Pliny when he was provincial governor in Asia minor to execute Christians if they didn’t recant, but not to go actively looking for them. Empire-wide persecutions only happened for the first time in the 250s (probably as a side effect of a general order to participate in sacrifice), but they were ended by emperor Gallienus in the early 260s. There then was a 40-year period, in which Christianity wasn’t exactly legal, but during which Christians weren’t persecuted (which probably facilitated the spread of Christianity, leading to Diocletian’s reaction, and making it all the more shocking because it was so unexpected after the previous 40 years of de facto toleration).
Silviosilver exaggerates, there were real persecutions of Christians and their position was frequently precarious during the first three centuries, but it wasn’t non-stop on the level of Diocletian’s persecution either.
There was a qualitative difference between Rome's efforts to contain Christianity and Christianity's efforts to extirpate pagans. That this extirpation was carried out over a century or so shouldn't obscure the determination that Christians had to cleanse their lands of pagans.
This eventually reached a point where one was simply not permitted to be a pagan. You couldn't pay your obeisances and be on your way, as Christians could when they were on the outer. It would have been like being an avowed atheist in Saudi Arabia today. You might get away with it for a while, but eventually the fanatics would get to you.Replies: @sher singh, @German_reader
The world’s 2nd biggest army with 71.6% modernised equipment ground and easily won air superiority ground to a halt against little more than token resistance. The only tactic they have left is long distance indiscriminate bomardment. They are already rethinking this a turning Mariupol into a new Grozny or Aleppo is not going to win them the war. They will lost the few friends they have left. So, they are now bringing in mercenaries from Syria and the Central African Republic to do the dangerous house to house fighting necessary to capture cities without indiscrimate shelling. Presumably, Russian troops do not have the stomach for it. The paratroopers did not distunguish themselves.
Even if the steam roller starts to move again (when the mud dries?) and wins by sheer numbers (the time honoured Russia way), the cost will be going up. The Ukrainians know their positions and strategies now. The Ukrainians have very equipment for a very solid infantry defence and a large amount of offensive equipment donated by Russia. As mentioned above, even if all 900,000 members of the Russian military attack they will just impede each other for the time being.
They can win militarily in NovoRossiya at enormous cost. Will it be enough to keep Putin in office? Does Putin matter? Putin is the head of an Orthodox fascist cult with at least 1.5m followers: the siloviki and senior officers. Any replacement will still be from this cult. They could brood on this for 25 years rather than change tack. China won’t support them once they run out of money. Economically, Russia will live in the 1980s at best.
Russian will not wholly win. Ukraine will not wholly lose. EU growth will be blocked. The US and China will be the big winners. India will not invade Kashmir. China will be slower to invade Taiwan than it was. Turkey will be a little winner in Central Asia and Syria.
If China is smart they can set up a SPV where Russian exports are balanced against imports to do business without actual capital movement to be sanctioned: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/03/how-europe-can-blunt-u-s-iran-sanctions-without-washington-raising-a-finger-humanitarian-spv/
Even if the steam roller starts to move again (when the mud dries?) and wins by sheer numbers (the time honoured Russia way), the cost will be going up. The Ukrainians know their positions and strategies now. The Ukrainians have very equipment for a very solid infantry defence and a large amount of offensive equipment donated by Russia. As mentioned above, even if all 900,000 members of the Russian military attack they will just impede each other for the time being.
They can win militarily in NovoRossiya at enormous cost. Will it be enough to keep Putin in office? Does Putin matter? Putin is the head of an Orthodox fascist cult with at least 1.5m followers: the siloviki and senior officers. Any replacement will still be from this cult. They could brood on this for 25 years rather than change tack. China won't support them once they run out of money. Economically, Russia will live in the 1980s at best.
Russian will not wholly win. Ukraine will not wholly lose. EU growth will be blocked. The US and China will be the big winners. India will not invade Kashmir. China will be slower to invade Taiwan than it was. Turkey will be a little winner in Central Asia and Syria.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @sudden death, @Mr. Hack
I’ve said China can be hit by hostile secondary and tertiary sanctions because of economic support to Russia. So China might end up with some crucial sectors being paralyzed (e.g. chips) at least in the short term and grow more slowly.
If China is smart they can set up a SPV where Russian exports are balanced against imports to do business without actual capital movement to be sanctioned: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/03/how-europe-can-blunt-u-s-iran-sanctions-without-washington-raising-a-finger-humanitarian-spv/
https://youtu.be/kQKrmDLvijoReplies: @sudden death
The best sword fetishism humiliation ever produced in 16 seconds, lol 🙂
Shock and disbelief.
That is again all I have to say today.
Do you think the ban hammer will soon fall?
ASBMilitary was eliminated at 200K Followers.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
Either that, or an ultimately unsatisfying outcome for both sides will be spun as a big win by both sides.
How's that for hedging my bets?
I appreciate your resolute certainty, but the only sure bet that I can come to is that all the people who "know" are ultimately posing. They may or may not have an educated reason for their pose, but any vindication or not will probably be a matter of chance or chosen perception. This isn't only directed at you specifically, but at the highly assured people on both sides around here.
Any comments on this new development. Are we going to see all the world's extremists heading to the Ukraine to fight it out over the next ... days, months, years and help keep their numbers down elsewhere?Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
Even if the steam roller starts to move again (when the mud dries?) and wins by sheer numbers (the time honoured Russia way), the cost will be going up. The Ukrainians know their positions and strategies now. The Ukrainians have very equipment for a very solid infantry defence and a large amount of offensive equipment donated by Russia. As mentioned above, even if all 900,000 members of the Russian military attack they will just impede each other for the time being.
They can win militarily in NovoRossiya at enormous cost. Will it be enough to keep Putin in office? Does Putin matter? Putin is the head of an Orthodox fascist cult with at least 1.5m followers: the siloviki and senior officers. Any replacement will still be from this cult. They could brood on this for 25 years rather than change tack. China won't support them once they run out of money. Economically, Russia will live in the 1980s at best.
Russian will not wholly win. Ukraine will not wholly lose. EU growth will be blocked. The US and China will be the big winners. India will not invade Kashmir. China will be slower to invade Taiwan than it was. Turkey will be a little winner in Central Asia and Syria.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @sudden death, @Mr. Hack
If this will happen, it will be very interesting to see with what kind of excuses for RF support will be appearing here from various Christian populists and/or Western racists when they will see Muslims and African blacks shooting at white Christian Ukrainians who are defending their own homeland in Europe?
That is again all I have to say today.Replies: @Blinky Bill, @sudden death, @Barbarossa, @Commentator Mike
19.6K Followers
Do you think the ban hammer will soon fall?
ASBMilitary was eliminated at 200K Followers.
By necessary here I mean there isn't an easy work-around. There's actually like ten people on the planet I can see who need twitter.
That is again all I have to say today.Replies: @Blinky Bill, @sudden death, @Barbarossa, @Commentator Mike
Self-awareness and self-criticism are very positive useful traits 😉
Here some videos from the crazy Chinese guy.
https://twitter.com/vicktop55/status/1502175213563219969
No one decides upon decoupling now because it will be a sectoral cascade event with a poorly recognized starting point. I singled out Russian sanctions as a possible starting point. If China hard decoupled, they could immediately run full trains with grain from Russia at rock-bottom prices - no longer any unilateral sanctions to appease. Servicing China will be enough for Russia's grain exports.
Brandon's handlers have all the power to manage things, and when it's Trump's handlers' turn again, they will keep the parts suiting their agenda and shelve the rest. No total reversal of directives relating to foreign policy. They hold back MiGs because Putin will nuke wherever airport they are transferred in Poland, which will trigger NAT Article 5 and start WWIII proper. They have decided not to escalate to the level of all-out military confrontation.
No peace for you.Replies: @A123
Your logic is internally inconsistent. If there was an all powerful side, they would be “The Decider”. GW tried that stance and Iraq went badly for him.
Why do you believe that the handlers who accidentally started run away inflation are “all powerful”? To Main Street Americans they look like a joke, though a dangerous one.
Which is good thinking. Even if the CCP could obtain 100% of Russia’s food exports they would still have a massive shortfall if they received no calories from the U.S.
PEACE 😇
Just about, it seems. We seem to have descended into reactive, crude side-taking politics that is just about as unintelligent as it gets.
As you note, Ukraine itself with it’s patriotism and willingness to fight represents something that the right should find highly sympathetic, making this a much more complex situation than any simple crude binary.
Honestly my consumption of news in general is severely limited, but just from reading blogs and writers I like I get the impression that you are correct and there is an insane, massive outpouring of demonization of Russians and hysterical anti-Russian sentiment, which is obviously wrong and terrible.
I am sure you are correct that the West is primarily motivated by fury that a power with (seemingly) different values is challenging it’s hegemony in a core area, Europe.
In a way, the alt-right and the mainstream are two sides of the same coin.
I would ultimately like to see some genuine “third way” thinking that rejects the Western mainstream while at the same time not falling for political systems and cultures that in different ways are as bad, like Russia or China.
Why is it so difficult for us to have something genuinely intelligent?
When that kind of political thinking starts to seriously emerge we will be making headway towards a new culture – already, some people are discussing how left/right no longer really makes sense anymore.
To your point, I never got the impression that even the Crusaders and the Muslims disdained the other’s courage. They naturally enough regarded the other as infidels to be driven back and destroyed, but still respected them as worthy foes.
It seems to me that deriding the worth of your foe speaks to a certain inadequacy in your own societal self-conception. Insecurity in one’s own position makes it necessary to dehumanize and minimize the worth of opposition.
In pre-modern times we didn’t have such existential doubts about the virtue of our cause. The Roman vs. Carthaginian wars were justified by the very fact that your culture and traditions, ancestors, and family demanded that you prevail. The deepest loyalties cried from the very soil to urge one on. Nowadays, those cultural anchors are all gone, replaced by empty propaganda and derision.
They seem have respected chivalrous behavior though.Replies: @RSDB
It was a whole way of life, not based on competitive aggression, and so very unlike the basic principles of pagan life, and also obviously more joyous and optimistic in a deep sense than offered by the popular pagan philosophies.
Ultimately, by their fruits shall you judge them.
The fact is, there is a sort of "eternal Way" that may be summarized by the Sermon On The Mount, but appears in different forms in all the religions, and that mankind is continually straying from towards self-aggrandizement, but that to follow is the path to deeply rooted flourishing.
Periodically, one needs a "realignment" to bring us back into accord with the Way, after having strayed too far.
We are obviously in such a time today.
The first individuals and small groups who reject the dominant culture and return to the Way, will inevitably attract attention as they live obviously happier and more joyous lives, and flourish in ways that people in the dominant culture don't - these people will serve as catalysts for change.
The history of early Christianity is an excellent template for this.
Ultimately, no one wants to be miserable - no one looks at Karlin or Chieh and says, wow, they seem so happy I want to be like them lol - or looks at the alt-right and thinks, yeah, these ego-monsters seem so happy and flourishing let me join - but people are afraid and don't see alternatives.
So at first, small groups and individuals must provide lived evidence of the alternatives, that are seeds. That's why probably the most important thing any of us can do really is live rightly well, and not necessarily expend much effort "convincing" anyone of anything - argument and discussion can be fun, but lived example is transformative.Replies: @A123
MAGA fits this pattern. It offers an escape from SJW misery and victimology.
Establishment lackeys of dominant culture mislabel it “Trumpist”. Most cannot grasp that MAGA is more important than any individual. Some fear it undermines their aspirations for total indoctrination society.
Efforts to crush MAGA are doomed to fail because its goal is transformive… A return to traditional values, hope, & joy.
PEACE 😇
If Maga is truly aligned with the Truth, then the obvious joy of following it will spontaneously attract adherents.
By their fruits ye shall judge them...
So if that's what you think, my friend, go live by it....see if it leads to deep joy and flourishing. If yes, yes. If no, no.
We shall all join you if yes :)
I am not opposed to all aspects of Maga, but I am not sure that it best represents the Way, myself...Replies: @A123
Maybe, it is inherently harder in modern times. First of all, we are broadly at peace. Secondly, because the conflicts that we fight tend to be asymmetric. In the first Gulf War, Iraqis surrendered to spotting drones used by battleships (used in WW2 but refurbished) ten miles away. And people who don't surrender, tend to take cover, to plant IEDs because it would be suicidal to engage on a frontline. Not a lot, practically nothing (maybe the Chinese and Indians in the Himalayas?) is man-to-man.
But there is another side to it too. As our society has become more feminized, the word "hero" has become debased. Whereas, before men were called heroes for rushing into burning buildings. Kids are called heroes for dialing 911. Maybe, those stories are necessary to popularize the service and keep in people's minds? But I think it also applies to other things. Rather than being stinting with praise, sometimes I think we are too profligate.Replies: @AaronB, @Barbarossa
As you say, some words have been watered down to the point of meaninglessness while others have become an embarrassment. Going back to a previous discussion I had with AaronB, I’ll bring up the word honor again.
While honor was a foundational concept through practically all of civilization (even when it was ignored) it is completely absent today. It has practically become an embarrassment to bring it up.
If one brings up concepts of honor in any conversation (at least in my experience) one is greeted by confusion, as if the concept is so archaic and foreign that they don’t know what to do with it. In other words, we just don’t think in those terms anymore.
As AaronB is saying, and I think our Sikh commenters would concur, a world without honor is a spiritually sick world of well armed worms blasting away at each other.
It seems to me that deriding the worth of your foe speaks to a certain inadequacy in your own societal self-conception. Insecurity in one's own position makes it necessary to dehumanize and minimize the worth of opposition.
In pre-modern times we didn't have such existential doubts about the virtue of our cause. The Roman vs. Carthaginian wars were justified by the very fact that your culture and traditions, ancestors, and family demanded that you prevail. The deepest loyalties cried from the very soil to urge one on. Nowadays, those cultural anchors are all gone, replaced by empty propaganda and derision.Replies: @AP, @AaronB, @Yahya
Not really. This seems to have become a phenomenon associated with Romanticism, that’s when ideas about “noble savages” became popular. Prior to that, more courageous foes were simply regarded as more noxious vermin, particularly evil.
They seem have respected chivalrous behavior though.
From Tirant lo Blanc: From the Dei Gesta per Francos: We see that Guibert of Nogent regards courage itself as a praiseworthy quality, and does not feel the need to deny the existence of good qualities in people who are committing evil acts; nor does he allow the good qualities to excuse the evil acts.
Regine Pernoud, in The Crusaders, quotes the Gesta Francorum: The chronicler adds: And yet by the grace of God they were defeated by our men.
A recognition of the courage and skill of the Turks does not prevent them from being called the "enemies of God and of holy Christianity", which they were.
A good soldier respects his enemy, so as to better be able to kill him; likewise a good Christian loves his enemy, even if it is necessary to kill him.Replies: @Barbarossa
Do you think the ban hammer will soon fall?
ASBMilitary was eliminated at 200K Followers.Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
Poor Glenn Greenwald was the toast of the town eight years ago and now he has to censor himself on twitter. I don’t know why anybody uses it. The only necessary use of it I has ever seen is when Mike Florio and Ian Rapaport and Schafter and those jackals were trying to scoop each other on who had the news about the Russell Wilson trade or whatever. *
By necessary here I mean there isn’t an easy work-around. There’s actually like ten people on the planet I can see who need twitter.
I quite like Rocky IV, but I think the underdog message is clouded a bit by the fact that the character was then rich (surely richer than Drago) and had won several big bouts, was being coached by the coach of another champion, and because it is a political story.
I think the best pure underdog story in the series is the first one. I’ve never been able to wrap my head around how the first Rocky movie seems fairly sophisticated (won oscar) and Stallone wrote it, but he also wrote the rather unsophisticated Expendables movies, which I thought were terrible, and I like action movies.
To tell you the truth, so far I have still only seen the first episode. Haven’t really watched anything else, with the exception of the first season (very short) of the Mandalorian, which I hate-watched, as a critique of current mass culture. (and I barely finished it)
I did finish that book you recommended though and thought it was quite good. I think it is nearly right up there with The Royal Road to Romance by Richard Halliburton, which is my favorite travel book of all time. It is also kind of uncanny how the story starts and ends in Detroit, and the author is pretty free in the use of his language, as we would consider it now.
Many folks can now become small time Halliburton's. I learned long ago that "thinking is the best way to travel", although I do enjoy real travel too.
Build a US base and witness black enlisted men race and murder the local women.
But I think such claims always end up being premature. In the 2006 war in Lebanon, the Israeli army had been transitioning to a "post-heroic" battle doctrine that prioritized technology and especially the air force, and ground forces were neglected, poorly trained, poorly equipped, and poorly motivated - expected to play a marginal role.
It didn't work. As the war wore on disastrously, it was gradually discovered that nothing but good old fashioned heroism on the part of infantry would do the trick.
We are certainly trying to transition to a dehumanized society of mere technique, where human qualities play no significant role - but I don't think this will ever truly happen. Each step in this direction, makes us sicker, and closer to collapse, and is thus self defeating.
I am sure in this war there are many examples of exemplary personal bravery on both sides.
Sure, the term heroism has become greatly debased, and it would be worthwhile to restore robust standards for that word.
But the really important thing is to restore all these "old notions" that modernity has abandoned in it's infinite wisdom. I don't mean simply returning to tradition - I don't think it's possible to ever go back, because we're different now. But instead of just discarding traditional concepts, as we've done, we can reexamine them, and revitalize them, by holding them up to the light of Nature and truth.Replies: @songbird
i think everyone’s nightmare is that we will soon transition to fully-automated, killer drones.
I guess that would be a pretty far cry from medieval times, when the elite were martial families, that had their own hereditary traditions, and which in Ireland (and I suppose other places?) had their own battle cries, which often involved shouting the family name, or the name of an old (and common) ancestor.
Quite quick first excuse dropped already, waiting for others into predictable collection 😉
That is again all I have to say today.Replies: @Blinky Bill, @sudden death, @Barbarossa, @Commentator Mike
It is certain that one of the true believer partisan sides is going to be shocked and disbelieving so I guess that your prediction is destined to be 100% accurate.
Either that, or an ultimately unsatisfying outcome for both sides will be spun as a big win by both sides.
How’s that for hedging my bets?
I appreciate your resolute certainty, but the only sure bet that I can come to is that all the people who “know” are ultimately posing. They may or may not have an educated reason for their pose, but any vindication or not will probably be a matter of chance or chosen perception. This isn’t only directed at you specifically, but at the highly assured people on both sides around here.
That is again all I have to say today.Replies: @Blinky Bill, @sudden death, @Barbarossa, @Commentator Mike
Putin has approved foreign volunteers to go and fight on the Russian side in Ukraine and tens of thousands of Middle Easterners are getting ready to go to the fronts. Does that qualify?
Any comments on this new development. Are we going to see all the world’s extremists heading to the Ukraine to fight it out over the next … days, months, years and help keep their numbers down elsewhere?
Certainly all kinds of far more dubious characters are fighting on Ukraine's side, and for that matter historical personages such as, say, Franco were not above using Moroccans in their conflicts.Replies: @Blinky Bill
2021 Nominal GDP Rankings
US \$22.9975 T
China \$17.7233 T
EU \$17.0919 T
United States \$22.9975 T \$USD
China ¥114.3670 T \$CNY
European Union €14.4479 T \$EUR
\$USDCNY = 6.453
\$EURUSD = 1.183
https://twitter.com/vicktop55/status/1502175213563219969Replies: @Blinky Bill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qJujhoirosReplies: @Mikel
Thanks. But in this subtitled interview with Chinese media he also says that there’s no doubt Russia will win if it fights “seriously”. It seems to be an older video but he has just posted it to his channel so he must still think so.
The questions are: Can the Russian military achieve that without leveling the cities? Will Putin prefer that option to being perceived as a loser? Will the West resist the mounting public pressure to intervene when the media reports an even worse carnage of civilians?
Another interesting and measured article by Richard Hanania arguing why Russia is most likely to win in the end:
https://www.metaculus.com/notebooks/10226/why-forecasting-war-is-hard/
Any comments on this new development. Are we going to see all the world's extremists heading to the Ukraine to fight it out over the next ... days, months, years and help keep their numbers down elsewhere?Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
Well they want to fight, why not let them, they will not be as gentle as Russians (they will likely just shoot civilians throwing Molotov cocktails at their vehicles instead of exercising Christ-like restraint) but that is on the Ukrainians for their irrational fanaticism.
Certainly all kinds of far more dubious characters are fighting on Ukraine’s side, and for that matter historical personages such as, say, Franco were not above using Moroccans in their conflicts.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FNCwBCXacAE8xy9.jpg
The March 11 show at the 74:32 mark:
https://wabcradio.com/show/the-other-side-of-midnight-with-frank-morano/
I’m hearing reports that Ukrainian fishermen have sunk four Russian battleships with some Molotov Cocktails. Those were top-of-the-line battleships with 20″ guns!
So much courage!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jCoSbslOsU
I think the best pure underdog story in the series is the first one. I've never been able to wrap my head around how the first Rocky movie seems fairly sophisticated (won oscar) and Stallone wrote it, but he also wrote the rather unsophisticated Expendables movies, which I thought were terrible, and I like action movies. To tell you the truth, so far I have still only seen the first episode. Haven't really watched anything else, with the exception of the first season (very short) of the Mandalorian, which I hate-watched, as a critique of current mass culture. (and I barely finished it)
I did finish that book you recommended though and thought it was quite good. I think it is nearly right up there with The Royal Road to Romance by Richard Halliburton, which is my favorite travel book of all time. It is also kind of uncanny how the story starts and ends in Detroit, and the author is pretty free in the use of his language, as we would consider it now.Replies: @Mr. Hack
Yes, Richard Halliburton was quite the guy, quite the adventurer. I once gave a copy of his “The Glorious Adventure” to a guy I know who likes to fly those one maned paragliders. I don’t know if he ever read it. It’s the kind of stuff that I’m sure Aaron would relish reading:
Many folks can now become small time Halliburton’s. I learned long ago that “thinking is the best way to travel”, although I do enjoy real travel too.
Even if the steam roller starts to move again (when the mud dries?) and wins by sheer numbers (the time honoured Russia way), the cost will be going up. The Ukrainians know their positions and strategies now. The Ukrainians have very equipment for a very solid infantry defence and a large amount of offensive equipment donated by Russia. As mentioned above, even if all 900,000 members of the Russian military attack they will just impede each other for the time being.
They can win militarily in NovoRossiya at enormous cost. Will it be enough to keep Putin in office? Does Putin matter? Putin is the head of an Orthodox fascist cult with at least 1.5m followers: the siloviki and senior officers. Any replacement will still be from this cult. They could brood on this for 25 years rather than change tack. China won't support them once they run out of money. Economically, Russia will live in the 1980s at best.
Russian will not wholly win. Ukraine will not wholly lose. EU growth will be blocked. The US and China will be the big winners. India will not invade Kashmir. China will be slower to invade Taiwan than it was. Turkey will be a little winner in Central Asia and Syria.Replies: @Yellowface Anon, @sudden death, @Mr. Hack
Your opinion is possibly the most realistic one I’ve read here up until now. As I understand it, you spend a lot of time in Russia and the Far East as an independent sales/businessman?
In last several presidential primaries, there were definitely some serious moments of ideological and electoral tension between white liberals/Hispanics on the one hand and blacks on the other in the Democratic Party.Replies: @Ron Unz
Not really. Iowa and New Hampshire come first and usually produce the crucial political momentum, and they have very few blacks, followed by Nevada, which is 10% black and 30% Hispanic. Heavily black South Carolina came fourth, and had almost never been important in a Democratic race.
Normally, Sanders’ wins in the first three races would have made him unstoppable, but since the Democratic establishment and its MSM allies didn’t like him, they said otherwise, and since the MSM creates reality, especially among Democrats, that was decisive. There was also all sorts of quasi-cheating in Iowa to suppress Sanders’ numbers.
The political dynamics is that the Democratic Party elites are mostly Neolibs/Neocons, while rank-and-file Democrats are overwhelmingly opposed to those ideological positions. So the elites need to use all sorts of tricks to stay in control, made easier by their control of the MSM.
Unlike other groups, blacks tend to focus mostly on racial issues, and partly for that reason they’re easier for the Democratic elites to manipulate. Black leaders are also generally easier to buy off. Given Biden’s track record, there was no logical reason for blacks to support him, but the elites decided he was their best shot at stopping Sanders, so they got several black leaders to endorse him, and the black voters overwhelmingly went along with it.
I can’t think of a single time when blacks have gotten their way in the Democratic Party on an issue the elites opposed and cared about. They mostly use blacks and black issues as a camouflage and a distraction, much like all the corporate CEOs support “woke” issues.
So its mostly the Democratic elites vs. the Democratic base, with the blacks used as cannon-fodder by the former.
However, there is massive cheating in Democratic primaries in black precincts. A lot of the "turnout" is as fake as a three dollar bill. That is where the Democratic elites work their magic.
Bernie never saw what hit him.Replies: @Justvisiting, @Ron Unz
The population most hurt by the flood uneducated illegals are low education, often black or hispanic, citizens. Maximizing the number of blacks dependant on government handouts is a very cynical technique to maintain power.
Black and hispanic employment was up during Trump's 1st term. Hispanics started flipping to the new MAGA Republican party. Blacks remain stubbornly aligned to the DNC, against their own self-interest.
PEACE 😇Replies: @A123
Normally, Sanders' wins in the first three races would have made him unstoppable, but since the Democratic establishment and its MSM allies didn't like him, they said otherwise, and since the MSM creates reality, especially among Democrats, that was decisive. There was also all sorts of quasi-cheating in Iowa to suppress Sanders' numbers. The political dynamics is that the Democratic Party elites are mostly Neolibs/Neocons, while rank-and-file Democrats are overwhelmingly opposed to those ideological positions. So the elites need to use all sorts of tricks to stay in control, made easier by their control of the MSM.
Unlike other groups, blacks tend to focus mostly on racial issues, and partly for that reason they're easier for the Democratic elites to manipulate. Black leaders are also generally easier to buy off. Given Biden's track record, there was no logical reason for blacks to support him, but the elites decided he was their best shot at stopping Sanders, so they got several black leaders to endorse him, and the black voters overwhelmingly went along with it.
I can't think of a single time when blacks have gotten their way in the Democratic Party on an issue the elites opposed and cared about. They mostly use blacks and black issues as a camouflage and a distraction, much like all the corporate CEOs support "woke" issues.
So its mostly the Democratic elites vs. the Democratic base, with the blacks used as cannon-fodder by the former.Replies: @Justvisiting, @A123, @Twinkie
Your comment is on point as far as it goes.
However, there is massive cheating in Democratic primaries in black precincts. A lot of the “turnout” is as fake as a three dollar bill. That is where the Democratic elites work their magic.
Bernie never saw what hit him.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/bridgeport-city-council-member-charged-vote-theft-conspiracy
https://connecticut.news12.com/voters-testify-that-election-fraud-occurred-in-bridgeport-mayoral-race-41132143
This is totally normal--what got the Feds interested was that white people stole black votes to defeat a black candidate in a mayoral primary--kinda amusing if you have a dark sense of humor.
Supposedly there was a great deal of manipulation and even cheating in Iowa as well, which successfully blocked Sanders' from getting momentum.
The same sort of elite/MSM effort successfully torpedoed Howard Dean in 2004.
Certainly all kinds of far more dubious characters are fighting on Ukraine's side, and for that matter historical personages such as, say, Franco were not above using Moroccans in their conflicts.Replies: @Blinky Bill
However, there is massive cheating in Democratic primaries in black precincts. A lot of the "turnout" is as fake as a three dollar bill. That is where the Democratic elites work their magic.
Bernie never saw what hit him.Replies: @Justvisiting, @Ron Unz
For those who are skeptical about “voter fraud”–in black precincts–both in primaries and general elections in the US–here are articles that drill a little deeper and shows how the sausage is made–these are two separate races in one urban area:
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/bridgeport-city-council-member-charged-vote-theft-conspiracy
https://connecticut.news12.com/voters-testify-that-election-fraud-occurred-in-bridgeport-mayoral-race-41132143
This is totally normal–what got the Feds interested was that white people stole black votes to defeat a black candidate in a mayoral primary–kinda amusing if you have a dark sense of humor.
However, there is massive cheating in Democratic primaries in black precincts. A lot of the "turnout" is as fake as a three dollar bill. That is where the Democratic elites work their magic.
Bernie never saw what hit him.Replies: @Justvisiting, @Ron Unz
I hadn’t been aware of that but it seems very plausible. Black areas tend to have the worst vote fraud, and since the Democratic elites run the Democratic primaries plus the MSM, such fraud would be much, much easier and safer to pull off than in the general election itself.
Supposedly there was a great deal of manipulation and even cheating in Iowa as well, which successfully blocked Sanders’ from getting momentum.
The same sort of elite/MSM effort successfully torpedoed Howard Dean in 2004.
Normally, Sanders' wins in the first three races would have made him unstoppable, but since the Democratic establishment and its MSM allies didn't like him, they said otherwise, and since the MSM creates reality, especially among Democrats, that was decisive. There was also all sorts of quasi-cheating in Iowa to suppress Sanders' numbers. The political dynamics is that the Democratic Party elites are mostly Neolibs/Neocons, while rank-and-file Democrats are overwhelmingly opposed to those ideological positions. So the elites need to use all sorts of tricks to stay in control, made easier by their control of the MSM.
Unlike other groups, blacks tend to focus mostly on racial issues, and partly for that reason they're easier for the Democratic elites to manipulate. Black leaders are also generally easier to buy off. Given Biden's track record, there was no logical reason for blacks to support him, but the elites decided he was their best shot at stopping Sanders, so they got several black leaders to endorse him, and the black voters overwhelmingly went along with it.
I can't think of a single time when blacks have gotten their way in the Democratic Party on an issue the elites opposed and cared about. They mostly use blacks and black issues as a camouflage and a distraction, much like all the corporate CEOs support "woke" issues.
So its mostly the Democratic elites vs. the Democratic base, with the blacks used as cannon-fodder by the former.Replies: @Justvisiting, @A123, @Twinkie
Sadly true.
The population most hurt by the flood uneducated illegals are low education, often black or hispanic, citizens. Maximizing the number of blacks dependant on government handouts is a very cynical technique to maintain power.
Black and hispanic employment was up during Trump’s 1st term. Hispanics started flipping to the new MAGA Republican party. Blacks remain stubbornly aligned to the DNC, against their own self-interest.
PEACE 😇
Here is more on the Hispanic drift towards MAGA. (1) Hispanics who are U.S. citizens are often trying to bring in family members legally. Illegals jumping to the head of the line displace those who play by the rules. They are not a monolithic block that Elite Democrats can readily manipulate.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/defcon-1-moment-new-spanish-language-conservative-network-fuels-fresh-rcna18704Replies: @silviosilver
They seem have respected chivalrous behavior though.Replies: @RSDB
This is true, but it is true in a sense which does not exclude what the other commenter is saying.
From Tirant lo Blanc:
From the Dei Gesta per Francos:
We see that Guibert of Nogent regards courage itself as a praiseworthy quality, and does not feel the need to deny the existence of good qualities in people who are committing evil acts; nor does he allow the good qualities to excuse the evil acts.
Regine Pernoud, in The Crusaders, quotes the Gesta Francorum:
The chronicler adds: And yet by the grace of God they were defeated by our men.
A recognition of the courage and skill of the Turks does not prevent them from being called the “enemies of God and of holy Christianity”, which they were.
A good soldier respects his enemy, so as to better be able to kill him; likewise a good Christian loves his enemy, even if it is necessary to kill him.
To AP: In summation, it is possible to oppose an enemy and consider him to be opposed to everything you stand for and yet respect him fully as such. Not to harp on "outdated concepts" again, but if you are formed culturally believing in and prioritizing traits such as honor and bravery, how can you fail to respect them in your enemies?
I agree with you that Romanticism took such things too far, as with the "Noble Savage" ideal, but it doesn't mean that they have no basis in reality.Replies: @Yahya
So much courage!Replies: @Barbarossa
I’m disappointed that the fishermen used Molotov cocktails. I thought they were just going to use a herring.
Split Ukraine by ethnic allegiance.
If people read more Tudman all this could have been avoided.
If the ethnic lines arent convent then just move people.
The population most hurt by the flood uneducated illegals are low education, often black or hispanic, citizens. Maximizing the number of blacks dependant on government handouts is a very cynical technique to maintain power.
Black and hispanic employment was up during Trump's 1st term. Hispanics started flipping to the new MAGA Republican party. Blacks remain stubbornly aligned to the DNC, against their own self-interest.
PEACE 😇Replies: @A123
Additional
Here is more on the Hispanic drift towards MAGA. (1)
Hispanics who are U.S. citizens are often trying to bring in family members legally. Illegals jumping to the head of the line displace those who play by the rules. They are not a monolithic block that Elite Democrats can readily manipulate.
PEACE 😇
__________
(1) https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/defcon-1-moment-new-spanish-language-conservative-network-fuels-fresh-rcna18704
From Tirant lo Blanc: From the Dei Gesta per Francos: We see that Guibert of Nogent regards courage itself as a praiseworthy quality, and does not feel the need to deny the existence of good qualities in people who are committing evil acts; nor does he allow the good qualities to excuse the evil acts.
Regine Pernoud, in The Crusaders, quotes the Gesta Francorum: The chronicler adds: And yet by the grace of God they were defeated by our men.
A recognition of the courage and skill of the Turks does not prevent them from being called the "enemies of God and of holy Christianity", which they were.
A good soldier respects his enemy, so as to better be able to kill him; likewise a good Christian loves his enemy, even if it is necessary to kill him.Replies: @Barbarossa
Thanks, that was exactly the point I was going to make to AP, but you have neatly beaten me to the punch. It saves me the time looking up citations as well, so I appreciate it.
To AP: In summation, it is possible to oppose an enemy and consider him to be opposed to everything you stand for and yet respect him fully as such. Not to harp on “outdated concepts” again, but if you are formed culturally believing in and prioritizing traits such as honor and bravery, how can you fail to respect them in your enemies?
I agree with you that Romanticism took such things too far, as with the “Noble Savage” ideal, but it doesn’t mean that they have no basis in reality.
What about this big old drone that flew over several NATO countries from the war zone and crashed in the capital of Croatia? Where were NATO air defences? Nobody even knew about the 6 tonnes drone until it crashed.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-12/drone-likely-flying-from-ukraine-war-zone-crashes-in-croatia/100904952#:~:text=A%20drone%20that%20apparently%20flew,no%20injuries%2C%20Croatian%20authorities%20say.
It’s quite the issue in Japanese areas around US bases. It’s a narrative suppressed in Germany though.
One thing that became visible already in 2014 was how independent and dispersed Ukrainian territorial groups are (well, at that time they had no other choice as the armed forces were lacking). It could’ve been a response to an existential threat, but it might also be something in the Ukrainian character (or both). These are free men who are capable of acting on their own.
Remember that, besides the Forest Brothers of Volyn, they also have this phenomenon of Machnovschina in their culture (of course, they were anarcho reds, but just the sheer ability to organize from below and act independently is quite remarkable, and, of course, it is stunning to see a white warlord in the 21st century). They have territorial defense and they’re currently in the process of mobilizing more. There are apparently more volunteers than rifles available. But, of course, we’re not at that point yet — the VSU will first go into a counter offensive.
Перемогаемо.
Peace through victory.
Recent tweet by Biden:
I totally agree, but why does he feel the need to emphasize it like this? Is this directed at Putin…or someone else?
Is it more people than ever? I confess that is the impression that I get, though it is hard to quantify these things and there were certainly crazy guys like Goldwater years ago, who wanted to roll the tanks into Eastern Europe. And not only that, but they seem to dismiss the deterrent power of nuclear weapons, and think that Putin will march on NATO next, which strikes me as crazy.
I fear that something is happening to us. Maybe, progressives have fundamentally increased emotions and outrage culture to the point, where, even people who fear nuclear power plants, don't fear the bomb. Or maybe it's because everything has gotten dumber, to cater to dumb people. Or maybe it is twitter.
What will it be like in another 20 or 30 years, with dysgenic trends? Perhaps, America should get rid of its nukes now, give them to Japan or something.Replies: @German_reader, @LatW
https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1502353759455821833I totally agree, but why does he feel the need to emphasize it like this? Is this directed at Putin...or someone else?Replies: @nickels, @LatW, @songbird, @utu
Cool. Blank check. Putin can invade any country he wants.
Three hefty Russian predator birds, just captured, admitting of carrying out criminal orders to murder Ukrainian civilians — the Xerxes in the Kremlin knew what he was going to do before he did it (at 7:50 and around 32:15, at around 39:50, admitting the futility of trying to occupy Ukraine, a long clip but has consecutive English translation):
Indeed, the fellows here are grateful for the opportunity to interact with the Ukrainian (and international public). I agree. It’s nice to sit in a warm room after you’ve catapu