“Serial philanderer… wrote having sex with an unconscious woman in college isn’t rape… member of a church led by a guy who thinks women shouldn’t vote… says no women in combat…”
This @JuddLegum list about Hegseth (who lives in TN) is something else. https://t.co/GQYVvZ7l33 pic.twitter.com/V4WGoBqDuI
— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) November 18, 2024
Women are the ones who vote for these wars and support them. The entire Ukraine war was a gigantic vagina operation from top to bottom.
They should have to go fight these wars. The fact that you have people who can vote and then not be forced to deal with the consequences of that vote is completely insane on its face.
We are going to need a big draft to do Zionism, maybe to do Ukrainian transsexual neo-Nazism and Taiwan gay pride marches, and these sluts need to be on the frontlines getting their tops popped off.
Pete Hegseth is a faggot.
AP:
President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has reignited a debate that many thought had been long settled: Should women be allowed to serve their country by fighting on the front lines?
The former Fox News commentator has made it clear, in his own book and in interviews, that he believes men and women should not serve together in combat units. If Hegseth is confirmed by the Senate, he could try to end the Pentagon’s nearly decade-old practice of making all combat jobs open to women.
Pete Hegseth
“I’m straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles. It hasn’t made us more effective. Hasn’t made us more lethal. Has made fighting more complicated,” he said in a podcast hosted by Shawn Ryan on Nov. 7. Women have a place in the military, he said, just not in special operations, artillery, infantry and armor units.
Pete Hegseth 5 days ago: "I'm straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles." pic.twitter.com/0W3LDSakud
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) November 13, 2024
Hegseth’s remarks generated a barrage of praise and condemnation. And they raised a question:
“Who’s going to replace them? Men? And we’re having trouble recruiting men into the Army right now,” said Lory Manning, a retired Navy captain who works with the Service Women’s Action Network.
The military services have struggled for years to meet recruiting goals, facing stiff competition from companies that pay more and offer similar or better benefits. And a growing population of young people aren’t interested in joining or can’t meet the physical, academic and moral requirements.
Removing women from contention for jobs, said Manning, could force the services to lower standards to bring in more men who have not graduated high school, have criminal records or score too low on physical and mental tests.
…
Hegseth has said he is not suggesting women should not be combat pilots, but that they should not be in jobs such as SEALs, Army Rangers, infantry, armor and artillery where “strength is a differentiator.” He insists the military lowered standards to get more women into combat roles. The services have said they did not decrease the standards for any of the combat jobs.
Hegseth’s view on women in combat reflects much of the debate over the past nine years, in the wake of then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter’s order in late 2015 that the military open all military jobs to women. That change followed three years of study and wrangling and was a formal recognition that thousands of women had served — and many were wounded or killed — on battlefields in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Obviously, women are not good at the military. Women are not good at anything, in fact. They are weak and stupid.
Related: New Zealand Defends Lesbian Captain After Country Loses First Warship Since WWII
But how can you allow them to vote, allow them to have power in society, if they’re not required to sign up for the draft?
Furthermore, it doesn’t matter if they can’t fight. Just send them on suicide missions where they start crying while brutal Russian psychopaths gun them down.
If you’re going to defend women not having to serve in the military, you have to also call for stripping them of all of their power in society. There is simply nothing else that makes any sense. Military services (or the willingness to engage in it in case it’s needed), from the time of prehistoric tribes, has been a prerequisite for participating in public society.
1. Pete Hegseth published a column in college that claimed having sex with an unconscious woman is not rape
The piece published by Hegseth claimed that rape required both the failure to consent and "duress," and women who are passed out cannot experience "duress" pic.twitter.com/fFW1BkLveo
— Judd Legum (@JuddLegum) November 18, 2024

RSS









(((Troll)))
Hegseth is a lunatic. Discount anything he might say.
However, given our feminized society, I think it is about time ‘strong’ women (and they are all stong, and truthful) take up arms against their male oppressors. Especially in countries outside the ‘rules based order’. Countries that hate women.
First, there’s the Russian patriarchy. You can tell how much Russians hate and oppress women just by looking at the 2024 Miss Russia pageant. Then, Chinese misogynists, who are using Black Myth Wukong to subtly indoctrinate young teenage boys into believing that women should be outwardly slim and attractive, but at the same time are evil fox spirits, deep inside. And don’t get me started about the Moslems, who tent them up so they can’t show off their breasts in public, and then take away their god-given human right of abortion.
Women ought to be clamoring to get into the fight. Shoulder to shoulder with Emma, and her two moms. Taking it to the enemy in ways they couldn’t possibly imagine. When that happens, it’ll be like Patton said:
“By god I actually pity these poor bastards we’re going up against, by God I do. We’re not just going to shoot the bastards, we’re going to rip out their living goddamned guts and use it to grease the treads of our tanks. We’re going to murder those lousy cocksuckers by the bushel-fucking-basket.”
I know George would have been behind these women. Unless he was more of an ‘on top’ kind of guy.
Hegseth strikes me as one of those guys who can’t keep his prick in his pants but he is no faggot, unless Anglin just uses the term as a generic expression of disapproval (as teenagers do). Women have no business in combat positions, period. The military would do well to revive the WACs, where women did good work outside of combat.
You sound like you are in favor of the military. There is your mistake.
People who think that Women should be in combat roles have never had a punch in the face. The US military has become a joke, they were always considered to be morons but now they are a laughing stock.
Anglin (almost) succeeds in making the dood sound reasonable;
of course I can only speak for engineers, recon and mountain (I was once young,
stupid and horny too 😜) … if the dame in question can:
– lift 300lbs with one hand
– calculate a bridge while running over it with full assault gear and 120lbs
of explosives
– run point all day in knee-deep snow with 100lbs of gear
– (I leave out the really debilitating stuff)
… I am willing to consider her application but not guarantee her tender feelz from
my other pretties; if not, her net value is negative (like a nigger in academia only
much worse) – a tax.
If she is just infatuated with large sweaty dik, everybody knows the watering holes
where the sort congregate; if she just wants to play soldier but remain respectable.
the institution of the “marching band” makes for a patriotic and taut derriére.
If she is otherwise unemployable, the DMV.
Jessica Lynch was the (admittedly cute) microcosm of everything wrong –
400 innocent Rackies had to die because she could neither drive a car nor keep
her gun in working order and a brigade-day went up for rescuing the
damsel-not-in-any-distress.
As long as no one is harmed by letting them play “equal” I say let them
(Holy Saint Gambrinus) but there have to be limits
(I am not “in favor of the military” but it´s good education – the Panthers also
encouraged their members to enlist, back in the day).
On the contrary I say we let all these rabid leftist women go fight the Russians on the Russian front and the Chinese in the Pacific. That will at least get rid of some of the cultural and civilizational problems they have caused in the country. I think this is a good idea.
I am in favor of the military defending the USA (e.g., ridding the country of illegal aliens), not Israel or Ukraine.
The people who benefit the most, and take the most, from society should be serving in the military. White women benefit from American society far more than their sons or brothers or uncles/male cousins do. They should have to serve in the military, or at least should be denied the right to vote on matters that may involve US military involvement somewhere. It’s a barbarous society where one gender is forced to die for the privileges of another. And anyway, women are so tough and smart that I’m sure they can handle Russians and Chinese on the battlefield.
We have a long way to go before we can break the glass ceiling. A good first step would be putting females in dangerous combat situations. Studies show that females are significantly underrepresented as cannon fodder and meat shields. As a feminist myself, I believe we can do better. Females should not only be allowed in combat, they should be drafted first and sent straight to the front lines.
With now three quarters of every cohort too fat, stupid and/or violent
for the Marines, some serious rethinking may be in order …
the Ottoman armies had the Yayalars (religious psychos) to lead the assault
and absorb the first volley – the pussy hatters seem made for the job.
Men can’t do those things either, you dork. At least the same man can’t do all those things. You dork. Do you actually know any men?
A real loon, but all we really had to do is look at him bare-chested to know he is a loon
The Farce has always been strong with you, Obi-wan 😁
That used to be fairly standard officer selection (except for the lifting,
an engineer specialty so dangerous they couldn´t make it official);
of course you have to be soft in the noggin to submit to that shit in the first place
(as noted I did not touch upon the really bad stuff).
As I said it´s very educational – like drinking.