The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
The Slutpocalypse Is Already Happening
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Hoes mad.

Hoes mad never changes.

The slutpocalypse occurred pretty much as we expected. Too many hoes, not enough hot chips or phone charges to go around. The details are trivial and pointless. The reason, as always, is pure sluttery.

That’s just a taste. There are thousands of these videos from all across the country, and many of them are getting violent.

Ethan Ralph went to the big DC protest yesterday. Here’s the replay of the stream on cozy.tv.

They’ll be out in full force tonight, and who knows how long it’s going to last. There is no demand that can be met, other than I guess expanding the Supreme Court.

Joe Biden is telling people not to riot. Good luck with that, buddy.

It looks like this could turn into George Floyd Riots 2. That’s difficult, because blacks don’t really care about this. Blacks do have more abortions than whites, but black men don’t care if women have abortions or not because they don’t really stick around either way. If anything, black men are probably vaguely opposed to abortion, though not in any serious way, just “she be out der fukin, she been gon deal wif what is.” Obviously, black men were the main driver of the George Floyd riots, whereas this is primarily about white women. They’ll be backed by Antifa of course, who also backed the BLM riots.

It’s possible that black men will come out if they think they can loot. But even then, I doubt they want to be associated with women – “dem bitches wants to keel dey keeds, dats on dem.”

We shall see.

As I’ve said: I support repealing Roe regardless, simply because it is the right thing to do. However, that doesn’t mean that this is not a gift to a struggling Democrat Party. The way this works is: there was never a federal law legalizing abortion. What the Democrats could do is promise that they will pass such a law if they are reelected in the midterms. I don’t think that would be enough to help them win in a fair election, but given that all of these fraud techniques from 2020 have now been normalized (early voting and ballot drops), it might be enough that they can reasonably get away with a lot more fraud.

That said, the more riots there are, and the longer they go on, the less of a help this is to the Democrats.

It’s probably just about time to bring back MLG memes.

We might just have to bring back Blue Lives Matter flags too.

No, I wouldn’t go that far. But a super-cut of cops beating up abortion people with that Baked Alaska song about how we love cops is probably in order.

This one goes out to all the hoes struggling with the fact that they can no longer kill their own children in red states:

If DMX was still alive, I would pay him to go perform on the pro-life side of these abortion protests, and just scream at the mad hoes.

Actually, he’d probably do it for free. I’d call him up, the conversation would go something like this:

Anglin: Yo, X – hoes mad!

DMX: They be. Ain’t a hoe ain’t mad.

Anglin: No X, seriously – they’re really, really mad.

DMX: Dawg, fer rill?

Anglin: Yeah, check that clip I sent you.

DMX: Oh shit, dawg! I ain’t seen hoes dat mad in a minute! Yo, Ima botta swoop through. We be botta deliver it to them hoes.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Abortion, Blacks, Roe vs. Wade 
Hide 173 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Alrenous says: • Website

    Okay okay.

    They deliberately got Roe overturned so that antifa wouldn’t be suspicious when they were paid to go riot, except they were actually paid to go get arrested specifically because everyone, even the Regime, hates the Woke and wants them to sit down and shut up. The orders have finally filtered through the pipeline.

    But yeah that’s a stretch. Regardless this is super weird. Something is absolutely going down behind the scenes and in the back rooms, the only question is what, exactly.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Charflodles
  2. It’s sickening to know that many of those protesting are GlobalHomo fags and lesbians who could care less about birthing children for natural human development. They’ve gone Monkey Pox crazy because the age of unlimited human sex orgies and Pedophile molestation of kids by elites have come to an end.

  3. Andrew, you kill me, man – but then, offensive humor’s always been my thing. Forgive my schadenfreude at these corrupt, brainwashed bitches who favor the killing of babies but were upset at the imaginary “murder” of that worthless POS George Floyd.

    • Replies: @Mario Partisan
  4. Notsofast says:

    it is amazing how americans don’t give a shit about their country bombing countries all over the world, murdering millions of people, displacing tens of millions, while spending trillions of dollars of future tax earnings, bankrupting the nation and destroying the future for generations yet to come.

    but if you infringe on their god given right to kill their own unborn children, they will go ape shit and burn the place to the ground.

  5. One day of largely peaceful riots down, 133 days of largely peaceful riots to go – til election day.

    Dems take the House and Senate, pack the SC with six child raping degenerates. Roe v Wade gets underturned, forever.

    Prove me wrong.

    And yo, logicfags, listen up: your logicky logicks logick that overturning Roe is totes no bigs, women know they just take a short pleasant slaycation to the nearest Dem state for their borting pleasure. Wrong. Women are being told the SC just took away their sacred right to kill babies. People believe EveryThing the media tells them as the last two years amply proved.

    The SC handed the Dems the most potent and beautiful October surprise ever – in June!

    • Agree: Hangnail Hans, meamjojo
    • Replies: @Eric Novak
    , @Alrenous
  6. Realist says:
    @Alrenous

    But yeah that’s a stretch. Regardless this is super weird. Something is absolutely going down behind the scenes and in the back rooms, the only question is what, exactly.

    What is going on is the power elite/Deep State is disrupting the society to establish total control. This is almost complete…it probably will be by the end of this year. Build Back Better

  7. @CelestiaQuesta

    I would really enjoy seeing the cue card Brandon’s aides hand him to address this problem:

    – YOU will enter the room.
    – YOU will greet and thank everyone for being there.
    – YOU will acknowledge the importance of women.
    – You will cite how your wife and daughters are women, how your mother was even a woman.
    – YOU will blame the current crisis on Putin and the Russians.
    – YOU will NOT fall over.

    • LOL: Dr. Krieger, Bumpkin
    • Replies: @Avery
    , @Richard B
  8. Anon[158] • Disclaimer says:

    A.A. Is the only one who writes Ebonics that I actually read. Bruv has an ear.

  9. Anon[251] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m worried a Supreme Court Justice is going to get murdered, and give Biden a chance to nominate a vaxx-mandating commie or two in his next two years. The riots could be used as cover for a Mossad hit team to take a particular justice out.

    • Replies: @Reverend Goody
  10. anon[330] • Disclaimer says:

    This is CIA’s standard trick to make you give a shit about your fake elections. CIA went to a lot of trouble to stuff Congress full of spies and install an actual vegetable as the perfect puppet ruler. With their secret agents in place CIA went ahead and lost WWIII and wrecked the economy and did Doktor Mengele gene experiments on your family. And now they’re nervous because people didn’t like it.

    So naturally they try to get you fighting each other, instead of just buying Ukie Army Surplus Javelins on the dark web and taking the GW Parkway to Langley and blowing the 7th floor out so it pancakes and SIS scumbags are hanging off the side by one squashed hand or foot like in Beirut.

    But really there’s nothing to fight about. Now that CIA’s got you all jabbed up, you got automatic free abortions for life. Every fetus dry rots in the womb and flops out dead. So we should all be friends👨‍❤️‍👨️!

    • LOL: 36 ulster
  11. I disagree that “Black men were the main driver of the George Floyd riots…” Black men aren’t usually the “main driver” of anything but theft and murder, and then only on an individual basis. True, they were out in force for the George Floyd riots, but only at the behest (or insistence) of Black women. Black women are the organizers, the logistics and communications for anything to do with the Black events (riots, weddings, church socials etc.), and they can be considered in taking an “active” role only when eliminating White liberals from the equation.

    • Replies: @Hangnail Hans
    , @Anymike
    , @Alden
  12. “…given that all of these fraud techniques from 2020 have now been normalized (early voting and ballot drops)…”

    Voting machines with proprietary (secret) software are more than worth a mention in this context.

  13. Is this the beginning of a backlash?? Are Whites waking up?? Have they finally had enough of the demonic, unholy influence?? Will the freaks, dregs and darkies finally be pounded back to where they belong??

    God, I hope so.

    • LOL: WHAT, Hangnail Hans, Bill
    • Replies: @bike-anarkist
  14. It sure does help distract from inflation and the 50 billion or so dollars we recently flushed down the Ukrainian toilet.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  15. Anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:

    President Biden: “I call on everyone, no matter how deeply they care about this decision, to keep all protests peaceful. Peaceful, peaceful, peaceful. No intimidation. Violence is never acceptable. Threats and intimidation are not speech.”

    Not when they stand a chance of losing your party an election, eh?

    Looking back, my guess is that the rioting in 2020 was more or less tolerated at the time because the US economy was still in fairly good condition. Anyone who wanted to feed their family could do so without too much trouble.

    However, it seems the rioting types want to try it on all over again now. Really?

    For this nonsense to crop up again, at a time when food, rent, and petrol prices are through the roof in the US, and nerves are dangerously frayed after two years of the Covid business…well, this may not be the best idea the American left has ever had.

    Frankly, if this latest outbreak of rioting in the US does not serve to sour every sane man and woman against the left for a long time to come, then my grasp of America is even poorer than I thought.

    I cannot see why any country would put up with this nonsense a second time.

  16. Avery says:
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    Good list, but you are a little behind the au courant, friend.
    The sexist term ‘woman/women’ is no longer acceptable in the new, improved America.
    The acceptable term is ‘Birthing Person’.*

    In that spirit:

    Wife -> Birthing Person Partner.
    Daughter -> Birthing Person Progeny.
    ____________________________________________
    *
    https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/06/14/biden-administration-uses-term-birthing-person-instead-of-mother/

    [In a bizarre attempt to transgender the English language, Biden has decided to bleep out the word “mother” and replace it with “birthing people”—a demeaning term that reduces women to some sort of utilitarian breeding center in another effort to eradicate gender. And yet, when Biden’s wokest leaders have been asked to explain the change, they can’t or won’t.]

  17. Steve Sailer:

    “As I’ve said: I support repealing Roe regardless, simply because it is the right thing to do.”

    But of course, you being a man you would never have to deal with a parasite growing inside you, feeding off your food and using your body, and the law telling you “no, you *cannot* remove it from your body.” When we are infected with helminths, we take protein translation inhibitors that are specific to their RNA so as to kill them. Of course a Human fetus is not a vermin, but it’s the same principle.

    It’s the “right” thing to do…no, it’s not. The right thing to do is to give people autonomy over their own bodies. Forcing a woman to carry through a pregnancy that she doesn’t want is far more inhumane than aborting a 3 month old fetus that has a brain the size of a grape fruit and is about as intelligent as a mollusc.

    This overturning will not be effective anyway, as women will not accept being told what to do with their bodies, and abortion clinics will become a big business. The more wealthy women might even go to other countries to have abortions.

    This is the kind of thing that makes *all* people on the Left, from classic liberals to progressives to socialists extremely pissed off at social conservatives. The backlash is going to be brutal. Bill Maher, for instance, who for the past couple of years has been dennouncing the insane “Woke” Left and it’s extremes, was enraged at this on his show and went on a rant against conservatives.

    But maybe this is the destiny of conservatives and liberals: to do battle against each other until one side completely destroys the other or they peacefully separate into different societies. Conservatives and liberals are just radically different kinds of human beings, and they feel like their most fundamental rights and lifestyle is attacked by the other side.

  18. @Alrenous

    The Supreme Court also cut down a bunch of gun control statutes this week, I understand.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  19. Amazing, so many demonic Americans fighting fanatically on the streets for their right to murder. Sick society.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Alrenous
  20. @Avery

    At least they did not say breeding people!

    • Agree: Avery
  21. Are these Slut Riots another step in the breakup of JSA? Then I’ll drink to that.

    To help along with the Balkanization, real Texans need to expel the woke infidels in Austin and Dallas back to Pacifica (my name for the post-Balkanization nation that will be created from California, Oregon, and Washington).

    • Agree: Cauchemar du Singe
  22. @Zero Philosopher

    The most important point about your argument is the fact that just because it’s a clump of human cells with human DNA doesn’t automatically mean it’s worthy of any special consideration.

    That goes for every trimester from the first to the four hundredth. There’s no inherent value or right to human life aside from what you do with it, and the sooner we start to admit this, the better off we’ll all be.

    God is like the GOP — if He really cared so deeply about unborn babies, he wouldn’t so relentlessly give them to scumbags to abort or raise in ignorance and poverty. He consistently fails us much more completely than we could possibly fail Him with our natural human frailty.

  23. @Zero Philosopher

    Since your comment demonstrates that you are about as intelligent as a mollusc, I wonder if it gives society the right to have an abortion to remove you from its midst?

    • LOL: Alrenous
  24. kahein says:

    awesome. i hope they go into your fucking dystopic flyover shitholes and …

    oh that’s right, there’s nothing of value there to destroy

  25. 36 ulster says:

    700 words, of which 61 were Anglin’s. Oh well, I DID enjoy some of the social media filler/crutches, and if that Iowa pickup driver has a donation page should he find himself in trouble, I’ll happily contribute. I’m pretty much in the bland consensus as regards abortion, but I will always relish every instance where the Left takes it–politically–up the ass. This time, they’re not enjoying the experience; indeed, they seem to have had something with the texture of stucco inserted ou’ le Soleil ne brille pas. I’ll leave it at that, as I can’t stand the sight of (rectal) bleeding. Time to wallow in the schadenfreude of it all.

    • LOL: Bro43rd
  26. Avery says:
    @Zero Philosopher

    {…you being a man you would never have to deal with a parasite growing inside you, feeding off your food and using your body,…}

    Please answer honestly: when you were conceived, were you a parasite inside your mother’s — sorry, like my bad — your birthing person’s body, a, you know, a parasite?
    And since a ‘parasite’ can no more become a human being than a toad can become a mammal — what say you , should be done with you?
    Or rather what should you do with yourself?

    • Agree: WHAT
    • Replies: @Zero Philosopher
  27. @Fidelios Automata

    So last night I was at this bar, sitting next to a boomer lib. He asked me what I thought about the ruling. What followed was a calm and respectful discussion about the underlying morality of abortion. I asked him – at want point, in your view, should abortion be allowed? Third trimester? Is it okay to “abort” the baby during labor? What about when the head is out, but the body still inside? Are you okay with “abortion” when the entire body is out? The answers were – “yes” to third trimester, followed by three “maybes.”

    Literal infanticide got a “maybe.”

    Anyway, that was the context. Sitting nearby were two rather attractive young women, who were eavesdropping on the discussion. They got up, came over to me, and began shouting a series of “fuck you”, “worthless piece of shit,” “people like you need to die”…etc. Wrap your head around that – it is the guy against infanticide who “needs to die.” Anyway, I told them that they were interfering in a discussion that did not involve them and calmly told them to mind their business and leave us alone. With an additional “fuck you” they obliged and left the bar.

    It got me thinking. We often hear that women want men who are willing to commit. On other hand, we have all these examples of completely unhinged females who passionately hate men who even question abortion.

    Now imagine a female having a choice between two men, who all things equal, differ in their attitude to abortion. Dude #1 does not give one shit whether she aborts his child; dude #2 really wants her to keep it and is willing to do what he needs to do to raise it. By the looks of it, these two bar demons and their fellow travelers shrieking and twerking in the streets, would opt for dude #1.

    Dude #1 shows by his lack of concern over the abortion that: 1) he has no commitment to the female, and 2) no commitment to his own genetic lineage, implying that he would be a rather shit father. Dude #2 is showing that he cares about the fruit of their union even before it is born, and thereby indicates that he is willing to make whatever sacrifices to make the best life possible for the woman and her/his child. Who do they want? The selfish piece of shit.

    Now where is Rosie to tell me its all my fault?

  28. @Anon

    I’ve thought….Why now to eliminate Roe vs. Wade? Is it because this involves body autonomy? Will the Supreme Court now rule for mandated vaccines in absence of this legal concept?

    Reality, abortion is going to be continued in most of America. And it’s a short Greyhound ride across state lines for the rest. Utahans can simply travel to Las Vegas or Denver.

  29. @Zero Philosopher

    But of course, you being a man you would never have to deal with a parasite growing inside you

    Got impulse control, you filthy slut?

  30. WHAT says:
    @Mario Partisan

    Nothing really new here, PUAs could have predicted you their reaction a decade ago. Anything and everything that goes against female hypergamy is anathema.

  31. Wokechoke says:

    Black women should be paid to abort and white females (carrying a white child) should be paid to keep it. It’s a demographic war to the end.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Here Be Dragon
  32. Wokechoke says:
    @Commentator Mike

    to be fair these cunts should be given hysterectomies. Especially the blacks.

  33. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Commentator Mike

    They’re throwing a tantrum because they think mommy (the government) doesn’t love them anymore. They’re not wrong, really. For the value of “love” that works when applied to a soulless bureaucracy.

    It’s not their fault their actual blood parents were almost complete derelicts.
    Although it is their genes’ fault, I suppose…

    Fundamentally they were told to fuck around and then have an abortion. Obediently doing this, now all of a sudden they’re told mommy doesn’t like abortions anymore. Result: whiplash. Further, given that without abortions they can’t really fuck around, how are they supposed to go back and not have been a slut in the past?

    You can’t argue it isn’t a betrayal.

    You can only argue that only a total retard, a complete idiot, a utterly shattered brain, couldn’t see (from well beyond the horizon) a betrayal coming.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  34. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Charflodles

    I consider the spiritual explanation a cop-out. Particularly because it’s nonspecific. “X happened, and therefore ~something~ will happen.” It will be very ~something~ I’m sure.

    However, without it, this is totally inexplicable. Did someone conquer USG while I wasn’t looking and are now quietly reversing everything? What changed?

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @SaneClownPosse
  35. anon[136] • Disclaimer says:

    These new riots must be costing Soros a fortune.

  36. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Sollipsist

    It’s true human life has no value, except in the sense that a human costs \$200,000 and has a stock value of \$700,000 on average. Like a high-end car except a good investment instead of a bad one. That said…

    Blaming god for disliking the consequences of your own actions? Try minding your own business, it helps.

    • Replies: @Sollipsist
  37. Wokechoke says:
    @Alrenous

    US Supremes triggered a frigging civil war.

    • Replies: @Cauchemar du Singe
  38. I wish Anglin would do more writing than just copying and pasting tweets plus links to horrible rap sites. He’s a good writer.

  39. Notsofast says:
    @Joe Paluka

    anglin appears to be attempting a montage here. cobbling together short, telling, snippets of the actual event as seen through the eyes of the woke “majority”. a very interesting blend of cinematic and literary artistic licence.

  40. frankie p says:
    @Zero Philosopher

    Andrew Anglin wrote this article, not Steve Sailer.

    “But of course, you being a man you would never have to deal with a parasite growing inside you, feeding off your food and using your body, and the law telling you “no, you *cannot* remove it from your body.” When we are infected with helminths, we take protein translation inhibitors that are specific to their RNA so as to kill them. Of course a Human fetus is not a vermin, but it’s the same principle.”

    Does this mean the US can finally get rid of (((the parasites))) growing inside our nation, feeding off of our labor, resources, and people, using our body, while the law tells us “no, you *cannot* remove it”?

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  41. @Zero Philosopher

    This is why women were “respected” by being kept chained in the kitchen. Every passing day in clown world/pedo (((West))) proves to me that our ancestors were not at all heartless nor were they brutal people. They just understood the nature of the liberal subhumans and women far too well.

  42. First of all, this is a great day.

    Other than that, I just want to say that, regarding the overturning of Roe, the muffled, muted, and sometimes downright disparaging responses of many on the Alt-Right have been sickening to behold, if not exactly surprising.

    There are those who say that this will energize the Democratic base for the midterm elections. I think this claim is entirely without foundation. It is the pro-life camp that will be energized. They are the ones just coming off an historic victory, while the pro-death camp is coming off an historic defeat. The idea that one should have the right to murder unborn babies is not going to be a very effective rallying point without the cover of the law.

    For that is what Roe did: It provided legal cover for people to act horribly and selfishly, and to do so in ways far outside the specific act of abortion. That was its tacit purpose, its intended purpose, and the explanation for its convoluted reasoning. And that is why the progressive Left fought for it with all its unhinged fury.

    Some people like to make snide comments saying that legalized abortion has been a boon to the country because it prevented millions of brown babies from clogging up the welfare rolls. Notwithstanding the monstrous immorality of such statements, these people are also oblivious to the ceteris paribus considerations that the Left seems to understand much better than they do.

    The progressive agenda is a seamless garment of evil. It advances heavily like a glacier, slowly pulverizing everything in its path. Roe was the cold heart of that glacier. Without the idea in the back of your mind that you can remove yourself from the consequences of your actions by any means, up to and including killing your own children, there never would have been that many people on welfare because the nation could not and would not have afforded it. Abortion enables the welfare state; it enables it because it smooths over the anxiety generated whenever anyone dares to ask himself the question, “How are we going to pay for all this?” Abortion then becomes the devil whispering in your ear: You can pay for it because you have no obligations, no duties, no cares. You don’t even have to care for your own children. See, you can even kill them if you want to. Consequently, you are under no obligation to defend your women from rape and lasciviousness, or to protect your daughters. Who cares if they get pregnant? There’s always a way out. Go ahead, let them dress like sluts. Let them work outside the home without chaperons. Let them sleep around. You can even screw them too, if you feel like it. You pay for the welfare state so that you can be free of care. Poverty, pregnancy, consequences, death—you don’t have to care about any of it. YOU, my man, are FREE. Small price to pay for doing anything you want. Now, doesn’t it feel good to do whatever you want?

    Abortion can do this because it is the sacrament of Satan. It is thoroughly and uniquely evil, because nothing could be more contrary to the will of nature and of God then murdering one’s own children. Killing children is the ultimate denial of reality because it is the denial of life, death, mortality, and futurity. It is the denial of time, which for every man must one day come to an end. Once you have denied this, you can deny anything else. That is the keystone in the whole edifice of moral positivism which enthrones the cult of the self.

    All of modernity and its progressivist religion exists to serve this cult of the self. Broken families, promiscuity, divorce, birth control, the welfare state, feminism, Affirmative Action (i.e. the elimination of standards), immigration, homelessness and drug addiction as a lifestyle choice, obscenity, homosexualism, transsexualism—it is all reality denial. And yes, as other commenters have said, it is all premised on the notion that the government will supply an infinite amount of money with which to fund that which is naturally counterproductive and sterile. Rather tellingly, it is all paid for not with production but with deficit spending. That is to say, it is not paid for at all.

    Roe was spiritually at the center of all of this. Now this is all at an end. Now we are about to reap what we have sown and be hammered with a giant backlog of real-world consequences the likes of which have never occurred in living memory. The bill for many evils has come due.

    This is a great day.

  43. @Anonymous

    Frankly, if this latest outbreak of rioting in the US does not serve to sour every sane man and woman against the left for a long time to come, then my grasp of America is even poorer than I thought.

    Diplomats and other visitors to Russia in 1916 and the first ten months of 1917 remarked how confused everyone was. Then the Bolsheviks struck and 66 million Russian Christians ended up murdered. It seems to me the Bolsheviks are consolidating control in the US today.

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  44. Truth says:

    Anglin, you’ve lost your ‘effin mind.

  45. Truth says:
    @Wokechoke

    Great possibility of that happening.

    Almost as great as butterscotch-flavored gumdrops falling out the sky tomorrow at 3pm.

  46. Truth says:
    @Joe Paluka

    I wish Anglin would do more writing than just copying and pasting tweets

    Well, that would take talent. Being an obnoxious little prick comes naturally.

    https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5a3d84c92100002c005f59b8.png?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale

  47. Biff says:

    I’m all in favor of these psychos killing their own babies; why would anyone want to interfere with that?

    • Agree: Hangnail Hans
  48. Anon[184] • Disclaimer says:

    This is pure speculation, but I wonder if part of the outrage is coming from women who are choosing to have sex with lower-quality men, because that’s the only way they can get any attention and anything that passes for affection from a male, but they don’t want to have children by these men. They’d rather wait around for higher-quality Alpha to impregnate them.

    What’s happening is putting an end to this scheming behavior, because it makes it a lot harder to get away with aborting the children of lower-quality men.

  49. @Intelligent Dasein

    I agree with much of what you said….Roe was a dumb ruling…..idiotic…..I read it many times and it never made sense to me.

    Now the states will decide and that is the way it should be.

    I do believe this energizes the left and makes them even crazier, if that is possible. I just listened to a crazy speech by AOC….a gibberish rant…..God that bitch is stupid.

    Of course, 14 fuck ups in the GOP signed off on red flag laws….which might hurt them….

    I hate the GOP and I’m tired of voting for cowardly assholes. What good is concealed carry if they can take your guns for some petty reason?

    Yeah, the abortion ruling is a good thing….maybe this will cause shitlibs to move to blue states, which will further solidify separation.

    • Replies: @Druid
  50. map says:
    @Zero Philosopher

    Yeah, you don’t believe in “choice” or “bodily autonomy” anyway. Did you support mask mandates and vaccine mandates? You did? Then you don’t believe in choice and autonomy. Once the government can decide what to inject into your body after declaring something good for you, then why can’t they decide whether you can have an abortion?

    The only thing that Roe supporters have to back their position is that, for some reason, they really like abortion. They like dead babies. Is this a sick fetish? Do the dead babies have some scientific value? Is this a sacrifice to Moloch or Baphomet? Who knows? Whatever it is, Roe was conceived from a very deep, dark place and it’s time for society to divorce from that darkness.

    Besides, the vaccines have nicely sterilized a lot of women. Abortion stats are about the crater. Something needs to explain that, so Roe was overturned to high one of the obvious side effects of a poison vaccine. The rest is just the usual divide and conquer strategy the ruling classes have been using for millennia. Now the sheep are all hot and bothered about something, even though they don’t know what a woman is and they can no longer qualify as birthing persons.

    Heck, I wouldn’t be surprised if this was all a planned failure of the Democratic Party. You have a potentially stolen election, massive inflation, a war in Russia, a loss of Roe, and burgeoning gun rights all under a Democrat watch. Any more temper tantrums on your part and society will beg for fascism to get rid of you.

  51. Anon[222] • Disclaimer says:
    @Zero Philosopher

    “Of course a Human fetus is not a vermin, but it’s the same principle.”

    All valid principles are derived from facts. If it is a fact that a human fetus is not a vermin, then your principle is bosh – a mere emission of emotional flatulence.

  52. Richard B says:
    @Kolya Krassotkin

    Great list!

    Since there’s probably no cue card that reads:

    YOU will NOT erupt in a fit of spasmodic mumbling, blow a loud, long and raspy old man fart, collapse from it like you’ve been shot, go into a seizure, and die on live TV!

    Maybe that’s how he’ll go.

    Probably not. But the thought does have its charms.

    • LOL: Kolya Krassotkin
  53. @classicbenz

    Most of the “peaceful protesters” I saw were white women. Not a vast majority, but a majority nonetheless.

    Now, the actually violent “peaceful protesters” were mostly POC and mystery meat males. Burning but mostly just stealing.

  54. @Anonymous

    Looking back, my guess is that the rioting in 2020 was more or less tolerated at the time because the US economy was still in fairly good condition.

    Ha! The 2020 riots were tolerated [read: promoted] because Donald Trump was president.

  55. @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    \$6 gas, \$200 grocery bills, and \$200/mo. winter heat bills prove you wrong. Nobody gives a shit about abortion.

    • Agree: Bubba
    • Disagree: Hangnail Hans
  56. @Joe Paluka

    It’s a post, not an article, so stop wishing.

  57. @Intelligent Dasein

    “Let them work outside the home without chaperones…” Who are you? A fucking rabbi?

    • Troll: Alrenous
  58. Moe Gibbs says:

    So Ho’ vs. Wade is dead. Does anyone really care? Any excuse to ‘riot’, to upset trad White America is fair game. It’s on like Donkey Kong, so let’s get crazy, yo. I don’t want to go to work on Monday morning, either.

  59. Alrenous says: • Website
    @frankie p

    If you’re really dedicated you can be a net tax consumer, feeding off the parasites rather than letting them feed off you.

    Stop giving them permission.
    If that’s what you really want.

  60. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Intelligent Dasein

    There’s nothing right-wing about being this invested in other people’s business.

    If they want to have a beef with god, that’s between them and god. God doesn’t need you to speak for him.

    • Replies: @Bill
  61. Attack the police, expect a beating. As it should be.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  62. Alrenous says: • Website
    @map

    Note that in this context “crater” refers to going down by about 4%.

    Yes the “vaccine” was poisonous, no it’s not rendering 50% of women barren or anything like that.

    That would lead to actual social change. Also, it would require competence, not mere negligence.

  63. @Mario Partisan

    You get lesbians standing up for these murderous abortion sluts. That shouldn’t concern them as they don’t get pregnant. Or maybe they go for AI and then still abort just to get nasty and do the murder, especially if the gender of the embryo displeases them.

  64. @Alrenous

    I thought they had the pill anyway so why do they need an abortion? There’s several other ways to have sex and prevent pregnancy. Do they lack imagination or information? Or is it plain lust for murder?

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  65. @Mario Partisan

    We often hear that women want men who are willing to commit.

    I do not think, even at this late date, there is a shortage of men who are willing to commit. I do believe, however, there is an acute shortage of women who view marriage as anything other than an opportunity to enrich themselves at the expense of the male.

    Who do they want? The selfish piece of shit.

    A case of like attracting like, perhaps?

    This impressive screaming and shouting from the pro-abortion crowd seems to emphasise the point that many (if not most) of today’s women are almost insuperably self-absorbed.

    (Our social media-addled society does not seem to be improving matters, either.)

    No doubt the two young women you ran into will be spending a lot of their time complaining how they just cannot seem to find a guy who is willing to commit as their looks fade. Luckily, their self-absorption will protect them from any awkward introspection as to why that might be the case.

  66. EdwardM says:

    Speaking of slutpocalypse, have you noticed all of the women commentators on MSNBC saying they “proudly” had an abortion? On my LinkedIn feed, countless career women are chiming in advertising that they had abortions (which even might be true in the case of some of them).

    It’s simply sick. Demonic. Plenty of middle-class white women earnestly believe that they should be able to have an abortion if unfortunate circumstance were to make that the best option, and I don’t begrudge them that, but no normal, sane woman is happy to have an abortion or thinks it’s something to celebrate.

    Thus, although abortion is an important issue for swing woman voters who might be inclined to vote Republican, I can see them seeing this cultural backlash and deciding that they want nothing to do with it. I don’t think this will provide a major electoral benefit for the left.

  67. anon[320] • Disclaimer says:

    Between the trannies moving into women’s sports, men on the toilet seats in the stalls next to them, and this removal of the unrestricted right to murder their babies, it finally looks like it might be woman’s turn under the bus. It couldn’t happen to a nicer sex.

  68. @Joe Paluka

    Recently it seems to me that he’s been writing a fair number of longer, higher-effort articles mixed in with the posts that are simply news articles or tweets with his commentary added. Not all of those get cross-posted to Unz, but in my estimation, he very well might be the best writer being re/published on this site right now. (Admittedly, the Unz bench is a bit lighter currently compared to previous years.)

  69. Druid says:
    @Robert Dolan

    I live in WA state which is a “blue state”. However, most of the state is actually red or pink. Only the west side, Seattle etc., if heavily blue. It’s not as clear as so many comments assume. I’m not blue

  70. Thomm says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Great comment, even if I am not as optimistic. Note the sheer speed at which the normalization of grooming of children ages 6-9 via public schools has happened. This is worse than Roe v. Wade. 2018 America was less deranged, all things considered, than July 2022 America.

    But a legal question : Since some states will legalize it and some won’t, isn’t the only real consequence that some people will have to travel 200+ miles to get an abortion that they could have previously gotten locally? Is that the only true difference that has happened?

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  71. Levtraro says:
    @Passing By

    Objection. Some molluscs are very intelligent. Consider the octopus, widely considered the philisophers of the seas.

    • Replies: @Passing By
  72. Miro23 says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Rather tellingly, it is all paid for not with production but with deficit spending. That is to say, it is not paid for at all.

    All this selfish counter-cultural junk is in fact paid for – it’s just that deficit spending spreads the cost across the whole of society. Or rather spreads the new debt cost across the whole of society.

    But even the whole of society can’t handle this much debt now. Liabilities are unfunded and will never be paid in real money with the trillions fed into the speculative casino also due to disappear and provide zero benefit to the US public.

    Now is about the right time for a proto-independent country like Texas to leave the union and start anew. It’ll work fine and others will join them.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @Cauchemar du Singe
  73. @Craig Nelsen

    If the Bolsheviks were consolidating control in the US the liquidation of all Born Again Christian movements in the US would have been a priority target and more workers than during the Civil War would have joyfully consented to die on the battlefield to kill each one of those anti-humanistic militants, up to the last one.

  74. @Levtraro

    I stand corrected. I shouldn’t have thoughtlessly returned the commenter’s argument. Especially since I’m in favour of a ban on hunting octopuses.

    • Thanks: Notsofast
  75. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Commentator Mike

    Convenience. If you forget the pill or whatever, why not just get an abortion? Takes the time pressure off. Most are sloppy, and conception is not particularly difficult for the lower classes. A nice inverse relationship between the required conscientiousness and the existing conscientiousness.

    Nobody mentions how unpleasant getting an abortion is. Almost as if your genes dislike having their reproduction interrupted. At best it’s a kind of hideously aggressive colonoscopy. The poor sluts get to find out when it’s already too late.

    Taking the pill is itself rather unpleasant for many women, so they can find themselves in a surprise sex situation where it’s too late to start up again. “I met this great guy! I had to take him home with me before I missed out!”

    Again, not really their fault that “free” love means slut-positive and requires women to regularly degrade themselves and signal low value.
    Only around 20% of women actually support feminism, but of course women are submissive, so it doesn’t much matter as long as the Regime lionizes abortion and deprecates marriage and kids.

    Women are conformist. The Regime portrays everyone as getting an abortion. Many subcultures feel the need to have their own abortion to “fit in.” Likewise if all your girlfrenemies are talking about their (horrible) experiences at the abortion clinic, can you really empathize until you’ve had your own? You don’t want to be left out, do you?

    Then the Stockholm syndrome kicks in. “I had an abortion, like I was told, therefore it must be good.” When Roe gets struck down, it harmonizes with the little voice inside them which says that, actually, getting an abortion is bad and they didn’t want to. Hence the meltdown. Ignoring the little voice is easy. Having to also drown out an outer voice means having to get…loud.

    On a personal note, I was almost aborted. My parents had been married for 20 years when I was conceived. My siblings were not exactly planned pregnancies either. Being able to control your womb is a very upper-class thing. Even if the spirit is willing, the flesh is weak.

    Especially in slut-positive love-negative times.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  76. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Thomm

    isn’t the only real consequence that some people will have to travel 200+ miles to get an abortion that they could have previously gotten locally? Is that the only true difference that has happened?

    Probably, yes.

    Unless it ends with re-legalizing marriage, it’s ultimately a distinctly symbolic gesture.

    Contrary to the us-or-them narrative pushed by the Regime, both those crying in agony and those throwing champagne parties are making mountains out of molehills. They are united in their love for clown world theatre. Teapot tempest.

  77. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Alrenous

    P.S. A lot of the reason many American women are so bitchy is because taking the pill makes them feel like shit but they feel obligated to keep doing it for a variety of reasons. They then take that stress out on you.

    By contrast Asian women are tremendously suspicious of the pill, so they have much less difficulty being nurturing or at least tolerable.

  78. @Druid

    These parts of the Left Coast will be claimed by Greater Idaho in the
    not-too-distant future.

    It has begun.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  79. @Mario Partisan

    Never confuse pretty with attractive.

  80. @rickmchale

    The fun part is they are running wild where the popo will put up with it
    and nothing much is going to change anyway (= good correlation).
    Where their oh-so-sacred reproductive nonreproductive Rites
    are really endangered they would be greeted with snipers
    (that on their home turf are reserved for just-fired White officers).
    The pattern should by now be familiar from the mostly peaceful Burn Loot Murders.

  81. The thumbnail of that one tweet with the hoe more interested in working her two mobile
    phones is instructive.

  82. @Alrenous

    It’s weird to talk about consequences concerning an omniscient subject. Can there ever be any consequences that aren’t included in His plan?

    This goes beyond the Problem of Good and Evil. If there’s a theological answer to the problem of an all-knowing, all-powerful God being disappointed with His creations, it’ll have to account for the feeling being mutual.

    I’m willing to consider the possibility that we’re an experiment in free will that didn’t go the way He hoped. But I can’t really blame any of the lab rats for being disgruntled that they’re constantly in danger of getting destroyed for not finding their way through His maze. “Well I’ll be darned — the ones that I bred to be blind keep missing the way out! How disappointing!”

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Alrenous
  83. Anon[131] • Disclaimer says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    “snide comments saying that legalized abortion has been a boon to the country because it prevented millions of brown babies from clogging up the welfare rolls. Notwithstanding the monstrous immorality of such statements”

    We also say it prevented a crime wave.

    As to “monstrous immorality,” not everyone believes the Christian dogma that all bipeds with the ability to use language are equal. That dogma is the first cancer cell of liberalism. Yes, it’s Christianity that is the root of communism and democracy, as has been pointed out many times.

    Your faux-morality is a jew-concocted weapon, a hack of the White mind. If you want to see a liberal, look in the mirror.

    • Agree: Kim
  84. Anonymous[387] • Disclaimer says:
    @Zero Philosopher

    A woman has autonomy over her own body. If she chose to have sex and risk pregnancy, that’s entirely her fault.

    The baby, however, is not her body, and she does not have the moral right to murder it, you evil freak.

  85. @Wokechoke

    It’s not a war, it’s Capitalism.

    When in the USSR a lot of children ended up becoming homeless, during and after the war, they were taken care of – special institutions were created where they were brought up as patriots.

    Having recevied decent education, most of the went on to become officers.

    This is what needs to be done instead of abortion, but that means spending money on people, and that’s wrong, right?

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  86. @CelestiaQuesta

    oh for the love of…..
    I wish you and so many other ….like-minded Americans….. would learn the ENGLISH language (exclamation MARK not point)!

    this could not be simpler:

    You mean to say ” ….COULDN’T care less” which means they have absolutley zero % care about said topic. ie:

    I couldn’t care less if my sister fucked our dog. (I care zero %)
    as opposed to:
    I could care less if my sister fucked our dog (because I secretly want to fuck him too).

    C’mon mate, wise up – and spread the word.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  87. @nokangaroos

    These parts of the Left Coast will be claimed by Greater Idaho in the
    not-too-distant future.

    Not going to happen.

    Even more Californians will move to the Northwest when the water runs out.

    That includes Idaho and Montana.

    • Agree: Bill
  88. @Sollipsist

    This goes beyond the Problem of Good and Evil. If there’s a theological answer to the problem of an all-knowing, all-powerful God being disappointed with His creations, it’ll have to account for the feeling being mutual.

    Abortion is a problem that is best described as being beyond good and evil.

    In a properly balanced society it wouldn’t need to be banned since the women wouldn’t use it as birth control in first place.

    We have two ideologies built upon race denial and neither side is willing to blink. Both are willing to ride out the destruction instead of admitting fault.

    God saw fit to isolate the Bantu from the Hebrews by a vast desert and surrounded them with all kinds of dangerous creatures. Only the White man’s will and inventions allowed them to leave the continent.

    Would he really be displeased if we allowed them abortion until the White man comes to his senses and accepts nature as it is?

    In all fairness to God this is clearly a human caused problem. Both the conservative Christian and the secular liberal are certain they can “fix” or suppress nature. Seems to me that God’s work is on full display and the modernist liberal/Con Inc Christian is the God/nature denier.

    God put the deadliest snakes near the Bantu and let the lions hunt them. Why would he care about abortion in Baltimore? Not convinced that God’s self-described representatives are taking a look at the full historic picture.

    • Replies: @Sollipsist
    , @Malla
  89. @Anonymous

    Baby is like shit in the West.

    Inside you, it’s your problem. Once outside, it’s everyone else’s.

    So, let the skank flush her shit-kid down the toilet.

    I don’t want it on my shoes.

  90. @Here Be Dragon

    The Suvorov Academies were instituted for war orphans of the
    Napoleonic Wars and always intended as officer-track;
    what do you propose to make of the girls, camp followers?

    • Replies: @Here Be Dragon
    , @Avery
  91. anonymous[429] • Disclaimer says:
    @Zero Philosopher

    Nobody is focusing on the real problem. The whitevil society’s proclivity for whorish behaviour. I mean that for both sexes.

    If you pagan godless bastards weren’t such whores for illicit sex, you would not need to murder all those babies.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  92. Anon[309] • Disclaimer says:

    Spanish Civil War coming Right up.

    • Agree: Cauchemar du Singe
  93. Escher says:

    This Anglin fellow is quite a rap fan by white nationalist standards.

  94. @anonymous

    There will be a sharp increase in ACOWW babies

  95. @John Johnson

    Morally, abortion is an automatic loser. All the “womens’ rights” in the world can’t make it a Good.

    Pragmatically, it’s a problem solver in a lot of ways. It’s a no-win issue that we have to face

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  96. martin_2 says:

    Am I being naive? Surely the issue in the present case is not whether abortion is right or wrong, but instead whether its legality or illegality should or should not be an issue for individual States to decide? These are two separate issues. That is to say, one be pro abortion yet still believe that States should have autonomy.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  97. anon[397] • Disclaimer says:

    @Zero Philosopher #18

    “This is the kind of thing that makes *all* people on the Left, from classic liberals to progressives to socialists extremely pissed off at social conservatives. The backlash is going to be brutal. Bill Maher, for instance, who for the past couple of years has been dennouncing [sic] the insane ‘Woke’ Left and it’s extremes, was enraged at this on his show and went on a rant against conservatives.”

    Do you mean to say that “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned?” We already knew that. That’s what makes this so fun. Yes, the left will be “mad as a wet hen.” But actually, it’s the left that finally got hit with a “backlash.”

  98. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Sollipsist

    Omniscience and omnipotence are clearly stupid ideas and they are absent in the real phenomenon.
    Hell is primarily a Sophism employed by unholy priests to try to manipulatively extract obedience. It’s not even true Christian theology, but a dumb Platonism. It’s obvious the original texts see sinner’s souls as mortal and finite. They aren’t tormented for torment’s sake, they cease to exist.

    Omni* is supposed to indicate “highest status” which is a dumb grass-monkey hangup to start with, and even if we take it seriously, logic outranks god. Even a creator god can’t create a married bachelor. Even a creator god can’t create a circle with corners.

    Further, for a god to be omnipotent, they first have to exist. Existence outranks logic, which outranks even the highest possible divine entity.

    The two terms are redundant. Any omniscient entity knows how to do all possible things. Any omnipotent entity can, among their actions, learn any truth. Anyone using both terms instead some gestalt indicates they’re not a serious thinker; they’re ignorant of the meaning of their own thoughts, never mind the actual external world.

    Since even a creator god is subject to logic, a creator god will also be affected by a conservation law, and won’t be omnipotent.

    Ironically, no, creation is not disappointing. It is just and generally working as intended.
    In other words, America is a tyranny because Americans want to be oppressed. Nietzsche was right; it’s slave morality. Supply is merely meeting demand, and America’s prayers are granted. It’s just that, as Satanists, the prayers aren’t what they claim the prayers are.

    You can’t openly demand to be oppressed. It looks dumb and it is dumb: the point is to appoint a leader who denies consent, not one who assents to it. Americans have to lie about what they want. Most of the complaining is humblebragging, “Damn look at what a victim I am, aren’t you soooo jealous?”

    You can tell because the Amish exist, among many other indicators. America is still, despite the Regime’s best efforts, a free country. You can just dodge the thing if you want to. Instead, Americans render unto Caesar. They believe what they’re told to believe; they only question the Regime along prescribed lines.

    P.S. Perfection is inferior to imperfection. Perfection is finite, whereas imperfection is unbounded.

    • Replies: @Sollipsist
  99. Alrenous says: • Website
    @KingChoppo

    (exclamation MARK not point)!

    Its non-bureaucratic name is [bang]. You can tell it’s a real word for real people because it’s one syllable instead of six.

  100. Alrenous says: • Website
    @martin_2

    The actual issue is whether mommy (the government) loves you or not. Just American things.

    Since this is obviously insane, they can’t really discuss it in good faith.

  101. Mike Tre says:

    I wonder is Anglin can celebrate the reversal of Roe without engaging in the semi-literate prose of dimwitted negroes.

    • Replies: @Kim
    , @Truth
  102. @Alrenous

    They are redirecting attention away from Covidocy, as that scam is unraveling at warp speed. The injuries and deaths from the killer shots are a real epidemic.

    No one is going to be prevented from getting an abortion, consumers can just cross state lines, or relocate to a abortion friendly state.

    There are probably “religious” and “humanitarian” groups preparing to provide free trips to clinics for birthing persons, who are disinterested in actual birthing and parenting.

    Unlike purchasing a firearm, which can only be accomplished in your state of residence from a FFL holder, and if you are not a criminal. Criminals have alternate access to firearms.

    Laws don’t prevent bad actions, they only provide penalties, if found guilty of a violation.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  103. @nokangaroos

    As we know girls can serve in the military as well.

  104. Avery says:
    @nokangaroos

    {what do you propose to make of the girls, camp followers?}

    Nonsense: girls can do a variety of things to support their Motherland.

    1) Intelligence: women’s linguistic brain is more advanced than guys’. Their abilities in that regard can be put to good use. I read somewhere that Bletchley Park employed lots and lots of women. (math is still man’s forte)
    2) Snipers: Red Army’s #2 sniper during WW2, after Zaitsev, was a woman. (forgot her name).
    3) Trauma surgeons.
    4) Nurses.
    5) Drone operators.
    A whole lot of things that doesn’t require brute force.

    Anywhere BUT the frontline trenches: that area is MAN only — for obvious reasons.
    Exhibit A: Ukraine SMO. Despite the incredible long range strike ability of Russian Military, they still need experienced warriors to slug it out with the enemy to take and hold ground.

    Plus, killing stuff in the field weighs a lot.
    An M777 howitzer projectile weighs ~125 pounds.
    An M60 type squad machine gun weighs about 30 pounds, not counting the belts of ammo.
    And you still have to carry your own kit, body armor, …….
    Aside from the physical aspect, a woman with a bunch of guys in the trench will distract the guys. Guys will do stupid things to “protect the woman”….

  105. Malla says:
    @John Johnson

    God saw fit to isolate the Bantu from the Hebrews by a vast desert and surrounded them with all kinds of dangerous creatures. Only the White man’s will and inventions allowed them to leave the continent.

    Arabs were moving in and Arabising the whole place anyways. There are blacks in India from the pre-European, Arab slave trade.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  106. @Avery

    If a woman is able enough to be a surgeon, the best thing she could do for her country would be to have six children.

    • Thanks: nokangaroos
  107. @Alrenous

    “Perfection is finite, whereas imperfection is unbounded.”

    I like that. A lot.

  108. @Alrenous

    As to the full extent of the damage the “vaccine” has done or will do, the jury is still out. I don’t think it wise to make any assumptions in that regard, aside from the proven fact that it is far more dangerous than any other given to the American people, including the live polio vaccine.

    The question is what might happen if widespread vax injuries become apparent.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  109. @Miro23

    It won’t happen by “States”, it’ll happen by regions; analogy: West Virginia breakng away from Virginia…different regional cultures.
    Current potential for that in, at least, Washington State; coastal West at extreme odds with Eastern part.
    Ohio, half a dozen cities are shit…countryside vastly different.
    Northern California above Sacramento, prime candidate for separation; similar divisions in Illinois and New York.
    Breakup and Balkanization is inevitable. The Feds are more distant from The People with every passing day. ZOGUSA won’t go on for much longer. Civil War will see to that. Doubt it ? There are individual States with more armed deer hunters than the entire ZOGUSA Army.
    1% of the general population could flush ZOGUSA like the pile of shit that it is, and has been since at least the assassination of JFK and the consequent coup d’etat by (((The Usual Suspects))) and their attack dogs in The CIA.

    A Whites Only (Khazars, Sephardics, various Muds and Mestizos are not White) ethnostate in Confederation with similar, with debt free currency modeled on that of The Third Reich or supported by a basket of commodities, a civilian badass militia well equipped/trained (“regulated” in 18th Century parlance), air/sea port(s) and The Will to flourish…is where I’ll be if still alive to see it happen.
    Speed The Day.

  110. @Passing By

    And of course, besides showing your retarded rage, you have given no arguments for why I am wrong. If I am as intelligent as a mollusc, you are as intelligent as lobotomized amoeba.

    • Replies: @Passing By
  111. @Sollipsist

    It’s a gradient. The fetus becomes progressively larger and more intelligent as time passes. What is the end point where it becomes “human”? There is no specific point. A 3 month old Human fetus is less sentient and intelligent than a chicken, and yet we kill and eat chickens.

    • Replies: @Charflodles
    , @Sollipsist
  112. @Avery

    Technically speaking, yes, I was a parasite. Just like you were a parasite. But I was a *wanted* parasite.

    The issue here is the woman’s ownership of her own body. Whether the fetus is a fuill Human or not is not even the issue. The issue is that you do not have the “right” to use another people’s body against their will. *That* is the issue.

    A conservative male would *never* tolerate the government to tell them what to do with their bodies. But you think it is 100% ok to force a woman to carry a pregnancy that she doesn’t want to full term. To have something inside her that feeds off her body and she has to drag around. It is outrageous your way of thinking. Worse, you are likely a man and will never have to go through this. It’s veery easy to tell others to bear a situation that you will never have to go through.

    • Replies: @Charflodles
    , @Alrenous
  113. @map

    “Yeah, you don’t believe in “choice” or “bodily autonomy” anyway. Did you support mask mandates and vaccine mandates? You did? Then you don’t believe in choice and autonomy. Once the government can decide what to inject into your body after declaring something good for you, then why can’t they decide whether you can have an abortion”

    This is an excellent point. Exactly. Conservative males don’t like the government to tell them even to wear face masks during a pandemic. Being forced to wear a mask is a very, very *very* tiny violation of one’s freedom than being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy I guess you just apply different standards to yourself and women, eh?

    “The only thing that Roe supporters have to back their position is that, for some reason, they really like abortion. They like dead babies. Is this a sick fetish? Do the dead babies have some scientific value? Is this a sacrifice to Moloch or Baphomet? Who knows?”

    This is pure ad hominem with no evidence to back it up. Nothing but hearsey. This is not about dead babies. First of all, a fetus is not a baby. Secondly, yes, aborting say, an 8 month fetus is gross. But the issue here is one of principle: body autonomy. Should a woman be forced to carry a pregnancy through when that means a living thing using her body to live? That is the key issue that consservatives ignore.

    Personally, if I were a woman and I got an unwanted preganancy, I wouldn’t abort the child. But this is not the issue. The issue is the right of the woman to own her body Vs the unborn fetus right to use her body. I think that the woman has the right ot her body, and my position on that issue is final.

    • Replies: @map
  114. The issue of abortion is the issue of the Woman’s right to her own body, Vs the right of the unborn fetus to live at the expense of using the Woman’s body against her will.

    *Personally*, if I were a woman and I had an unwanted pregnancy, I wouldn’t abort the fetus. I do agree that abortion is gruesome, especially if the fetus is over, say, 4 months old and starting to resemble a Human.

    But what conservatives don’t understand is that there is a larger issue here, an issue of ethics and philosophy even more serious than whether abortion is homicide or not, and that is the right of self-possesion.

    Conservative males got outraged over the government demanding facial masks during the pandemic because it violates personal autonomy, but they have no problem with a government that tells a woman that is pregnant that she cannot remove the unwanted fetus, and *force* her to have somebody else living inside her for 9 months against her will, carrying it around all the time, with that somebody else using her body for sustenance. That is a *serious* violation of personal autonomy, much more serious than things like mask mandates. But the double standard doesn’t hit them.

    Even worse that only women can get pregnant, so it’s very easy for a man to say that abortion is murder and that she must have the baby, when he would never be in that position in the first place.

    Another issue, not as important as the issue of personal autonomy, but still relevant: child birth in Humans is dangerous because of the huge size of the Human head. Back in the 19th century, almost half of all women died from childbirth. While the risk is lesser now, it is still traumatic, painful and dangerous with a non-neglegible risk of death. So an unwanted fetus not only uses the woman’s body against her will for 9 months, but also puts her life in jeopardy. Which is more important, the life of the woman that actually owns the body, or the fetus which is just using it? My response to this is clear: of course it’s the mother’s life that is more important.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  115. anon[294] • Disclaimer says:

    @Zero Philosopher #115

    “The issue here is the woman’s ownership of her own body.”

    Perhaps she is not the owner but merely the steward. Certainly she is the steward of the human in her belly, and there is a whole lot of accountability and responsibility connected with stewardship. You seem to arrogate to the female the right to do what *she* wants to do not only with the baby human’s body, but with its very life. If you do the f**k, honey, by God you’re stuck! You’re choice, but accept the consequences like a big girl. Otherwise, perhaps you’re too immature even to have sex. Or maybe you should just go do the lezbo thing with other like-minded life-haters. Babycide is murder.

  116. @Anonymous

    Well said. It’s not religion or ideology but simple undisputed biological science: each “Fetus” is a genetically human being, distinct from all others, and not part of someone else’s body.

    We can argue over when that helpless, not-yet-thinking human being can be killed with legal impunity, but a distinct human being he/she is, and scientifically not part of the mother or father’s body.

  117. @Zero Philosopher

    It is human at conception. It’s not a chicken, an elephant, nor an eggplant. Its DNA is completely human, not on a gradient. A one month old baby hasn’t the intelligence of a dog, and people kill and eat dogs. Seen “Infant” on the menu at your local diner?

    • Thanks: RadicalCenter
  118. @Zero Philosopher

    The sole purpose of women is to bear and nurture children. That’s why they have all these otherwise useless body adaptations. For our part, men must plow fields, hunt elk, build houses, and fight Orcs. Those who don’t carry out these functions are parasites on their communities. Let them support themselves, and die if they can’t.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  119. @Zero Philosopher

    If you were intelligent as a mollusc, you would have understood that one’s brain size or intelligence are not criteria to decide whether one’s allowed to live or not but since you’re way beneath octopuses on the evolution ladder, you are incapable of grasping it. Moreover, your comments demonstrate callousness characteristic of sociopaths.
    You are stupid and you are a sociopath, you aren’t simply a dead weight, you are a nuisance. I’m asking again, should you be aborted?

  120. @Avery

    Wife -> Birthing Person Partner.
    Daughter -> Birthing Person Progeny.

    “Men Can Give Birth Too” – coming to a street near you in three… two… one…

  121. Bill says:
    @Alrenous

    No, but the stupid, deluded people having the beef need it.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  122. Rob Lee says:

    Nice honorarium opener honoring the Fallout series.

  123. As to “monstrous immorality,” not everyone believes the Christian dogma that all bipeds with the ability to use language are equal.

    That’s a very vague statement. I would say, intentionally so. Christianity does not teach that as people differ. As far as Christ dying for them, everyone is equal and salvation is available to all. people, however, are not equally gifted. There is much more than could be posted, but I think the point is made.

  124. @Druid

    Seattle had that far left mayor who had to resign in disgrace, when it was discovered he’d been molesting young men and boys, including a foster son, when he was living in Oregon. As I recall, he was white and the kids were minority, so he used his white privilege to skate without even a slap on the wrist.

    To make things even more interesting, the investigation, if memory serves, began when he tried to make trouble for the newly inaugurated Trump administration and so the Trump administration began to expose ugly, old skeletons in the mayor’s past.

  125. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @American Citizen

    the 50 billion or so dollars we recently flushed down the Ukrainian toilet

    You mean that we used to make Pelosians “flush” with even more moolah.

    I strongly suspect Garland and other visitors to skeevy “Keev” met with Nuland’s cuck (Zelenskyy) to get their bag of gravy-train greenbacks.

    It’s “war” after all. Who’s going to keep track of all them thar skids-o’-loot?

    As for the shipped weapons: can you say “Black Market cha-ching”?

  126. @Malla

    God saw fit to isolate the Bantu from the Hebrews by a vast desert and surrounded them with all kinds of dangerous creatures. Only the White man’s will and inventions allowed them to leave the continent.

    Arabs were moving in and Arabising the whole place anyways. There are blacks in India from the pre-European, Arab slave trade.

    That was well after European exploration of South Africa.

    What are you saying anyways? Arabs would have eventually made the place Muslim?

    Probably which further makes my point which is that God was fine with the Bantu living without Christianity and would have been fine with them being Muslim.

    The Conservative Christian imagines God as a pro-capitalist globalist that expects the White Christian to save the Bantu. If that were true then God would never have isolated the Bantu in the first place. God was fine with leaving the Bantu isolated for tens of thousands of years. The chosen people had no idea that the Zulu existed.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @HallParvey
  127. @Zero Philosopher

    Personally, if I were a woman and I got an unwanted pregnancy, I wouldn’t abort the child. But this is not the issue. The issue is the right of the woman to own her body Vs the unborn fetus right to use her body. I think that the woman has the right to her body, and my position on that issue is final.

    I fully agree.
    How can that ever be refuted.

  128. @Sollipsist

    Morally, abortion is an automatic loser. All the “womens’ rights” in the world can’t make it a Good.

    I agree that it is immoral.

    Doesn’t mean that it should be illegal.

    It’s also immoral to maintain a political ideology where people that talk about human nature are ostracized and suppressed.

    Modern conservative ideology is immoral. It actively tries to suppress Whites that talk about nature and how it conflicts with their plans to pray the Bantu away. Is nature not the creation of God?

    They suppress Whites that would serve as moral and intelligent leaders. Instead they favor charlatans and entertainers that just repeat the same feel-good excuses about how Blacks just need charter schools ‘n low taxes. Conservatives favor beta level thinkers that stick to the narrative and don’t look at our problems thoughtfully.

    The legality of abortion pales in comparison to their desire to suppress reality. Whites on the frontlines shouldn’t have to live with the results while the high priests of AM radio and Fox News find refuge in the burbs.

    Modern conservatives don’t have the moral credibility to demand an end to abortion. They are unwilling to face reality and shouldn’t be allowed to create policy that allows them to live as separate from the consequences. If Con Inc leaders all had a to adopt a Black child or live in a Black neighborhood then their opinion of abortion would change overnight.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  129. heymrguda says:
    @CelestiaQuesta

    That occurred to me also. Most of the most radical protestors are radical feminists , if not outright lesbians,who want nothing to do with men let alone get impregnated by them. What are they going to do, pay \$ to be artificially impregnated so they can have an abortion?

  130. Truth says:
    @Mike Tre

    I wonder is Anglin can celebrate the reversal of Roe without engaging in the semi-literate prose

    “I wonder IF Anglin can celebrate… semi-literate prose…”

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  131. anon[232] • Disclaimer says:

    @Truth #135

    “I wonder IF Anglin can celebrate… semi-literate prose…”

    Even semi-literate prose is many steps up from ebonics.

  132. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Bizarro World Observer

    Widespread injuries are already apparent, and nothing has already happened.

    It was obvious the moment they asked for liability protection. It’s okay, nobody mind that they got liability protection; Americans took the vaccine anyway.

  133. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Bill

    Yeah you just want to help. Sure.

  134. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Zero Philosopher

    Luckily a fetus isn’t a person and thus not entitled to personal autonomy. You can tell because

    Women, of course, can’t choose not have sex. They don’t have that much personal autonomy.

    We don’t hold women responsible for the consequences of her own actions because, obviously, she is not responsible for her actions any more than a toaster or other sandwich-adjacent appliance is.

    Americans respect women’s inability to refuse whatever happens to plug into her, like an electrical socket.

    • Thanks: RadicalCenter
    • LOL: Passing By
  135. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Zero Philosopher

    But I was a *wanted* parasite.

    When I go to the grocery store, I steal food.

    It’s *wanted* theft though. Likewise, they steal my money. I, er, *want* them to steal my money?

    • Troll: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  136. @heymrguda

    That occurred to me also. Most of the most radical protestors are radical feminists , if not outright lesbians,who want nothing to do with men let alone get impregnated by them. What are they going to do, pay \$ to be artificially impregnated so they can have an abortion?

    What they have is a subconscious desire to be pregnant by someone better than a left-wing wimp and channel that resentment by demanding that even late term abortion be a “Women’s right”. If they can’t be pregnant by even an average man then no one should be pregnant.

    Just look at the angriest and unhinged ones that the protests. Always crass and unattractive. They show up with their gay friends and pet soy boys.

    The unhinged blue hair dog moms will never get an abortion. If they somehow get an Alpha male in the honey trap then it’s off to the baby store. 100% guaranteed.

  137. Mike Tre says:
    @Truth

    Ith isn’t a word, Troof!

  138. Malla says:
    @John Johnson

    Today’s conservatives of the West (at least of Britain) are the ideological descendants of the original Classical Liberals. William Joyce’s book, Twilight Over England, explains this well
    https://archive.org/details/WilliamJoyceTwilightOverEngland/WilliamJoyce-TwilightOverEngland/
    While today’s “liberals” are basically Marxists. Add to that Christianity being a universal religion, Western mainstream conservationism is by default Globalist and Universal. What the West needs is Racial Conservatives. The base of political thought in the West is itself too liberal.
    Add to that the fact that many Conservatives are controlled opposition (controlled by the same ZOG) or/and they are too gentlemanly and have no clue about the nature of the cunning, ruthless Marxist “liberals” they are facing. They somehow feel that if they give the opposition inches the opposition will calm down for good and realize that the Conservatives are not “morally inferior”, as the ruthless leftists accuse them to be. But these kind of Conservatives do not realize that the ruthless opposition will not stop until they achieve total totalitarian power and murder the Conservatives.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  139. Malla says:
    @John Johnson

    From my earlier post 143

    and they are too gentlemanly and have no clue about the nature of the cunning, ruthless Marxist “liberals” they are facing.

    And this has been going on for at least a century. From Nesta Webster’s book ‘Surrender of an Empire’, she writes about politics in 1920s Britain. From Chapter 14, ‘Conservatism in Power’, she writes.

    “How is one to explain the paralysis that seemed to come over the Conservative Party on the morrow of their victory ? Borne back to power on that wave of popular indignation against all attempts to disrupt the country and the Empire their position at this moment was impregnable.

    But the Conservatives seemed afraid to follow up their advantage. To drive home the truths they had proclaimed during the election would have seemed to them ” unsporting ” — like trampling on a vanquished opponent in the ring. No, the Labour Party must be helped on to its feet again, its wounded feelings must be smoothed, generous tributes must be paid to its administration. Conservative ex-Ministers spoke of the inevitability of “ Labour ” again assuming office at some future date, intimating that once it had been purged of its ” extreme ” elements this prospect could be faced with equanimity.

    …snip…

    To the electorate that had placed the Conservative Party in power there seemed no reason why Conservatism should not hold its own indefinitely and Socialism, at any rate, be relegated to the limbo of dead and forgotten things. The programme that whole-hearted Conservatives looked to the Government to carry out might perhaps be comprised in the following nine points :

    1. The Campbell case to be followed up with a view to exposing the Cummunist plot in England.
    2. Revolutionary agitation to be declared illegal.
    3. A Trade Disputes Bill to be passed, freeing the workers from the anomalies of the political levy and the tyranny of the trade unions.
    4. Relations with Russia to be broken.
    5. Alien immigration to be restricted.
    6. The House of Lords to be reformed.
    7. Safeguarding to be extended.
    8. A firm line to be taken with regard to foreign policy, particularly in the matter of reparations and disarmament.
    9. British interests in India, China and Egypt to be resolutely defended.

    If this programme had been put into execution the Conservative Party might have made their position secure, stopped the revolutionary movement and restored peace and prosperity not only to England but to the whole civilised world.

    …snip…

    2. Revolutionary Agitation

    In accordance with the same cricket spirit the leaders of the Conservative Party decided that no strong measures were to be taken against Communism. The huge Conservative vote had practically constituted a mandate to the Government to put down Bolshevism with an iron hand, and nothing, it seems, would have been easier than to announce at this crisis :
    ” We are determined to make an end of the revolutionary agitation which has held up the reconstruction of the country ever since the War. We place no bar on freedom of speech with regard to the statement of grievances, whether real or imaginary, but whoever preaches revolution shall be dealt with by the Law. Further, all persons found guilty of conspiring with the enemies of the country shall be arraigned for high treason.”

    Some such measure as this could surely not have failed to win the support of the great mass of the nation, and even the secret satisfaction of the Labour Party to whom the Communists were a perpetual thorn in the side, urging them to carry their theories immediately into practice with the certain result of final extinction.

    But nothing of the kind was done, and even alien Communists were not prevented from carrying on their intrigues. The present writer remembers hearing at the time that on the morrow of the Conservative victory hundreds of Bolshevist agents fled the country, but at the end of a few months, hearing all was well, returned triumphantly and resumed their work.

    As a natural consequence of this immunity, Communism steadily increased during the first years of the Conservative Government. The C.P.G.B. (Communist Party of Great Britain), that had never since its foundation in 1920 exceeded — officially at least — a membership of 5,000, grew by 1926 to 10,730, and by the end of that year to 13,000 — ^the highest figure ever recorded. Meanwhile a number of subsidiary Communist organisations had come into being. ”

    —————–

    MALLA: The truth is that the populations of the West had wisely rejected Bolshevism (and hence vicious hatred of the left for Western Civilization including White working classes) but the Conservatives were either controlled opposition of the elites who wanted Bolshevism (Orwellian Control) imposed on the population slowly, or they were too nice, chivalrous and gentlemanly to understand and fight the threat the West was facing.

    • Replies: @Malla
  140. Malla says:
    @Malla

    Relations with Russia to be broken.

    Here it means Soviet Russia.

  141. Malla says:
    @John Johnson

    Arabs would have eventually made the place Muslim?

    Yup. Even by the time of the Belgian Congo Free State, there was Tipu Tipps slave Empire nearby. Blacks natives were actually escaping Tipu Tipp’s Slave Empire to seek refuge in the King Leopold’s Congo Free State. Congo-Ziare is Central Africa already, quite deep inside the continent. Just some way to go south till Cape Town. Africa might have in a slow fashion eventually islamised and Arabised. Not saying, that would have been a bad thing. Just sayin. All the way down, Khoi San Muslims.
    Maybe the Arabs would have found logistics difficult deep South, unlike Europeans, How would they deal with Sparta like warrior tribes like the Zulus in the South with limited logistics? But they would have support from their earlier converted Black tribes.The Southern part of West Africa, the Southern parts of Ghana, Nigeria etc…would have been arabised too. There is a Islamic Christian fault line in Africa which falls in with the desert climate and tropical climate Africa fault line. It would have taken much more time to arabise the more tropical South compared to the arid north, where the Arabs were comfortable, no doubt.

    That was well after European exploration of South Africa.

    I think Arabisation and Islamisation has started way before European age of exploration. And you should read the racist stuff the Arabs wrote about Black pagans.

    Probably which further makes my point which is that God was fine with the Bantu living without Christianity and would have been fine with them being Muslim. ..If that were true then God would never have isolated the Bantu in the first place. God was fine with leaving the Bantu isolated for tens of thousands of years.

    Agreed, the black Africans should have been left alone by Europeans. Blame the Christian missionaries who wanted to bring them into the fold, save their souls and make schools and hospitals for them. Before that Africa’s population was going down, especially due to Pagan Witch Craft and other factors. The Missionaries were in the fore-front in reversing that.

    But Sub Saharan Africa fell on the way to the East Indies (Indian Subcontinent + South East Asia) via the Cape of Good Hope route, to break the Islamic monopoly of spice trade in between Europe and South Asia + East Asia. And Whitey has a good habit of exploration and studying everything int he Universe (which includes Africa) but also the bad habit of White Man’s burden.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Anymike
  142. Anonymous[970] • Disclaimer says:

    Negros gonna Negro.

  143. Malla says:
    @Malla

    Africa might have in a slow fashion eventually islamised and Arabised. Not saying, that would have been a bad thing.

    Well, bad thing according to Nigerian Nobel Prize winning Novelist Wole Soyinka, who had criticized both the “imperialist” Abrahamic religions of Islam and Christianity in favour of traditional African religions.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  144. @Zero Philosopher

    I’ve always heard that human tastes like pig, which is a bit reassuring as I’ve never especially liked pork or ham. It’d be easy to give up. Bacon, on the other hand…

    The important point about Soylent Green is not that it’s people, but that consumers were OK with the meh taste.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  145. @Kim

    AA has always been heavily influenced by blacks. Apparently it was a black nationalist who turned him onto fascism and national socialism. Thankfully it seems like he’s dropped that recently.

  146. @Avery

    Women POWs will be a great problem for the government to handle. The pressure to get them back , through prisoner exchange, etc., will be much higher. As long as there are enough men around to do the fighting, women should not be put on the front line.

  147. @Malla

    Today’s conservatives of the West (at least of Britain) are the ideological descendants of the original Classical Liberals. William Joyce’s book, Twilight Over England, explains this well

    Our conservatives and libertarians like to repeat that musing of them being “true liberals” but it isn’t true.

    What you call “classical liberals” had no problem discussing race or the limits of private capital in regard to public good.

    Today’s conservatives will flip out if you question either. They get emotional and start mumbling about Thomas Sowell and MLK. They aren’t able to keep it together. Discussing race or economics outside the accepted boundaries is very difficult for them.

    While today’s “liberals” are basically Marxists. Add to that Christianity being a universal religion

    I would describe liberalism as a universal religion.

    I have no problem with calling liberals Marxists but the typical liberal has never read Marx and at the most as has seen the motorcycle diaries while stoned. It’s largely emotional and they have all but dropped Marxist working class concern in favor of blaming Whites for everything. That shift is largely from the Frankfurt school but they have no idea as to the history of their beliefs and don’t care.

    Liberalism is mainly a religion for secular Whites. That is really what it comes down to.

    Conservatives are not “morally inferior”, as the ruthless leftists accuse them to be.

    I am anti-leftist and I hold conservatives to be morally inferior when compared to the average man. They suppress the naturally moral and strong in favor of lawyers and hacks that can repeat feel-good expressions about capitalism and promote simplistic solutions that have failed. Rush Limbaugh promoted charter schools for years even though Betsy Debois had already sunk 250 billion yes BILLION into them. These realities are kept from conservatives. It’s feel-good love fest about capitalism and churchism where the truly brave and moral are NOT welcome as they might disrupt the party with their harsh talk of reality.

    • Agree: René Fries
  148. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Alrenous

    Nerve status: direct hit.

  149. @Sollipsist

    When some blackfellas took to eating miners in Queensland, they called it ‘long pig’. Chinese were preferred-tastier, less stringy.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  150. @heymrguda

    Clarence Thomas let the cat out of the bag re. future reactionary ambitions. There is NO mention of lesbianism in The Constitution.

  151. @Charflodles

    The sole purpose of Charflodles is to make us grateful that we are not he.

  152. @John Johnson

    Probably which further makes my point which is that God was fine with the Bantu living without Christianity and would have been fine with them being Muslim.

    Depends on which God you refer to. If you mean the God who created the Heavens and the Earth, quite right. But any reference to fake God means he demands obedience and worship.

    And financial contributions. Lots of financial contributions. To feed the poor. In some cases he guarantees eternal life, instead of eternal roasting in the lake of fire. Either, Or. No other choice. Sorry.

    In other cases He promises virgins. 72 at last count. Sometimes He promises Golden Streets and Pearlie Gates. I suppose it depends on what the worshiper finds valuable.

    Fake God is easily identified. All those Gods worshiped by people other than me and my group.

  153. Anymike says:
    @classicbenz

    No. There apparently is an radical underground which is able to foment politically motivated ghetto riots on a coordinated basis. What happens, though, is that these riots quickly deteriorate into a situation of opportunistic looting and arson and nihilistic violence.

  154. Anymike says:
    @Malla

    Didn’t most of the European colonization of Subsaharan Africa take place late in the 19th Century? Didn’t the Europeans have the o9pportunity observe the American experience and consider the eventual consequences of what they were doing? Do they never learn from anybody or anything?

    If they thought they had to administer Africa, and maybe they did, they should have done it collectively, not competitively. Right now, the Chinese and the Indians are penetrating Africa economically at a steady rate. Some people complain about this, I don’t see why. The experience of the white West in Africa has been very contentious.

    If Africa need administration, let someone else try it. If we need anything they have, pay for it. If the Indians and the Chinese are the middlemen, consider them a needed buffer.

    • Agree: Cauchemar du Singe
    • Replies: @Malla
  155. @Malla

    Apparently, winning a Nobel prize doesn’t mean the winner is well-informed about any specific matter lying outside his core competence.

    Just (try to) imagine a world where there would be only traditional African religions and their likes; I only can briefly refer to Mircea Eliade who has elaborated on the matter in Le sacré et le profane, Gallimard, Paris 1965, p. 11.

    I already have elaborated on the matter under https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/written-by-a-european-for-europeans/#comment-5313749 (where the conclusion was “Thanks to the Catholic Church as shown above, we DO exist, however”), so IMO Soyinka should be grateful to the “imperialist Abrahamic religion Catholicism” for his own very existence instead of vituperating against his Mother.

    • Replies: @Malla
  156. Malla says:
    @Anymike

    Didn’t the Europeans have the o9pportunity observe the American experience and consider the eventual consequences of what they were doing?

    The Europeans considered themselves morally superior than Americans and wanted to end slavery in Africa. This competition for moral superiority among various White peoples and in between Americans and Western Europeans persists to this day. Maybe throw the Russians and white Africans in the competition as well.
    White man has a mania for competing with each other for moral superiority till the point of suicide.

    they should have done it collectively, not competitively.

    That would never have happened because it was competition in between European countries (later Japan and USA too) which drove colonial Empires in the first place. Colonialism was basically inter-European competition overflowing into the rest of the World. It started with competition in between Muslims and Europeans in trade with the east but soon the Muslims were out of the picture and the Europeans (including Russians) started competing with each other for control of territory because if we do not take this territory first, the other side would. If Europe would have been one big entity, a Baroque EU including Russia, there might have been no European colonialism as we have seen.

    If the Indians and the Chinese are the middlemen, consider them a needed buffer.

    China has all the right to be in Africa. But the earlier inter Euro competition and fears and insecurities among European powers has now transformed into fears and competitions in between various powers such as the Chinese, West, India etc.. China has to make sure that they have influence to source raw material for their industries. better to have influence or else the Wets might use its influence to sanction us in the future like they did Japan. They are completely right. But their involvement in Africa triggers further fears in the West and India who too go in and get involved further. The Chinese are now experts in building vast infrastructure projects on the cheap thanks to the lessons they learnt back home. No other party in the World can compete with them in this in scale and price. Nether the West, nor India nor Russia, not Japan. Interestingly Vietnam is slowly joining this competition.

    Some people complain about this, I don’t see why.

    From an objective point of view, there is nothing to complain about China in Africa. From a subjective Western point of view, there might be.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  157. Alfred says:

    Who needs contraception or abortion?

    Birth Rates Drop Worldwide Following Mass COVID-19 Vaccination in 2021

    Why do you think there is a shortage of “pilots”? Actually, there is a shortage of a lot more than just pilots – air traffic controllers, maintenance engineers, flight attendants etc.

    75,000 AA passengers have had flights canceled in the past 48 hours

  158. Anymike says:
    @Malla

    My thought is that an ad hoc division of labor between the Chinese and the Indians already has developed and will develop further as the economic colonization of the Global South proceeds. The Chinese will manage the infrastructure and natural resources and the Indians will manage the commercial economy and farming.

    My geopolitical argument is that if the Global South needs management, better the Chinese and Indians take care of it than the white West. They reasons are myriads but the most basic one is that there is the history of bad blood between European-descended white and people of color. It’s insuperable. In that sense, the advocates of CRT are right. There is no cure for it short of a system that utilizes the productive capabilities of European-descended whites but socially and politically diminishes them. That’s if you have a multiracial society. Even if there was utter economic parity, meticulous equal opportunity and social peace, it still wouldn’t be enough if the whites were visibly living according to their own standards of social order.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  159. Anymike says:
    @SaneClownPosse

    Laws don’t even tell you that you can’t do something. They only tell you what could happen to you if you do. If you are plotting a crime, the plotting itself also is a crime and that is why the law can interdict you before you actually begin the process of perpetration the same way it can interdict a crime in process.

  160. Anymike says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    The Vietnam vets I knew made sly references to long pig too, implying that the rural Vietnamese sometimes partook. The term might long have been all over the Global South.

  161. Anymike says:
    @heymrguda

    When I lived in the San Francisco Bay Area in the 70s, 80s and early 90s, I regularly read the various leftist free weekly papers. One of these had a feature about what essentially was a radical feminist abortion cult.

    The member of this collective did examinations of each other and had learned to detect by the appearance of the cervix whether the member was pregnant or not. I thought being several weeks late would be indication enough but the examination was part of their cult ritual. When it was determined that the member was pregnant, a procedure called “menstrual extraction” was performed, which of course terminated the pregnancy if there was one.

    According to the feature, the members of this collective went out and deliberately got themselves pregnant so that their pregnancy could be terminated by the group. That’s why I called them an abortion cult. The inner dynamics of the group were not discussed as far as I know. Whether it was a group composed entirely of peers or whether it was directed by a dominant woman or several dominant women is something that I do not know. Maybe the organizations that counsel women who have PTSD or other emotional distress because of past abortions know something about these cults, but I have never heard anything else about them.

    If anybody else knows anything, speak up.

    • Replies: @Alden
  162. map says:
    @Zero Philosopher

    This is an excellent point. Exactly. Conservative males don’t like the government to tell them even to wear face masks during a pandemic. Being forced to wear a mask is a very, very *very* tiny violation of one’s freedom than being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy I guess you just apply different standards to yourself and women, eh?

    You forgot the rest of my example, where I included the vaccine mandate. That is a huge violation of the “bodily autonomy” that you aborters are so obsessed with. You aborters lost this argument the moment you demanded the government forcibly inject you with unknown substances.

    This is pure ad hominem with no evidence to back it up. Nothing but hearsey. This is not about dead babies. First of all, a fetus is not a baby. Secondly, yes, aborting say, an 8 month fetus is gross. But the issue here is one of principle: body autonomy. Should a woman be forced to carry a pregnancy through when that means a living thing using her body to live? That is the key issue that consservatives ignore.

    A fetus is a stage in the life of a person. Left to its own devices a fetus always becomes a person eventually.

    The “My Body, My Choice” rhetoric in support of a nonexistent right to abortion has always been nonsensical. In most legal jurisdictions, a woman has no right to put certain substances inside her body, drive with certain quantities of legal substances inside her body, place her body in certain specified locations, or charge other individuals for hourly access to her body. This has been true for decades, if not centuries, and with the occasional exception of the latter example, no one seriously attempts to dispute these laws on the grounds of bodily autonomy.

  163. Malla says:
    @Anymike

    Isolating themselves more from the “Global South” will actually benefit the people of the West but the Globalist Western elite scum will not leave. And some other idealistic/commercial groups in the West need to understand this too.

    They reasons are myriads but the most basic one is that there is the history of bad blood between European-descended white and people of color. It’s insuperable.

    This “bad blood” is fake and created or hyped up by Jewish and marxist propaganda. But in doing so they actually benefit (but harmed by allowing in hostile outsiders) the West and harm the global South with fake propaganda history.
    Secondly this concept called the “Global South” will not last for long and is a fake weak construct. It will soon break up into a “Clash of civilizations”. It has already started.

  164. Malla says:
    @Anymike

    In that sense, the advocates of CRT are right.

    CRT cannot be justified in anyways. It is basically Jews/Marxists attacking the West using extremely fake paradigms promoted by Western media and academia. If CRt is to be applied, it would have to be applied to all human populations on Earth because most human populations on Earth are naturally racist/ tribalist/ sexist/ ethincist etc… We third Worlders are naturally “Nazi” (in the way the National Socialists of are portrayed by the Western Media/academia), we were always “Nazi” and we all will always be “Nazi”. The German National Socialists were too liberal for our taste. In other words, we all Third Worlders are extremely tribal and the more traditional among us believe in the (genetic or cultural) superiority of our particular tribal (racial, national, ethnic, religious, sectarian) group. This is how we Third Worlders always were and (most of us) always will be. And unlike in the West, where it has been considered immoral in being racist or tribal in anyway for many decades now, in our part of the World, being tribal or racist is considered morally superior and you are shamed for being a traitor if you do otherwise..

  165. Alden says:
    @classicbenz

    Weddings? Weddings? Blacks don’t organize weddings because they don’t get married.

  166. Alden says:
    @Anymike

    I too lived in San Francisco during those times. I was totally opposed to the influx of federally funded Jewish radicals and their endless causes to destroy the Bay Area. I too kept up
    with the radical lunatics. As far as I know, once Roe legalized abortion in 1973 the feminazies moved on to other destructive causes. Why should people with no medical training learn to do operations which only medical Drs were legally permitted to do? Even licensed midwives weren’t licensed to preform abortions. I never heard about it.

    Remember, Ronald Reagan was governor of California January 1967 to January 1975. He both lobbied for and happily signed laws legalizing homosexuality and making it far far easier to obtain legal abortions in California. By real Drs in hospitals complete with a couple days stay to recover. In fact once Reagan’s pro abortion law was passed and signed, women, mostly unmarried girls came from all over the country came to California before Roe 1973?to get abortions on the grounds of whatever the criteria were.

    The only problem in obtaining abortions that I remember was that catholic hospitals catholic drs and nurses and drs and trained in catholic university med schools refused to do abortions. Since antiquity major occupations of the Catholic Church has been hospitals and education including university med schools. So they’re was over represented in hospitals and colleges.

    For instance, the huge Kaiser med system isn’t catholic. But so many drs were catholic that even with 200 drs employee at each med center only 4 or 5 were willing to do abortions. Willing to do abortions. But they did not want to run abortion practices. They were regular oby-gyny drs who who preferred to spend most of their time delivering babies and on gynecology issues.

    That was the real reason oby-gyny separated itself from the abortionists. Abortion at abortion clinics, regular oby-gyny in hospitals.

    The problem of all the catholic and catholic hospital employees White American men Drs working in oby-gyny and abortions was also solved by the satanic supremes in 1973. Griggs vs Duke Power. Which removed all merit and reasonable criteria for everything from medical school admission to janitor jobs.

    Within a few years, because of the Griggs decision med schools stopped admitting White Americans especially men and admitted only Asians and Indians mostly women. Who have never had problems with abortions or killing newborn girl babies.

    Maybe the cult was planning for the end of abortion if Roe was ever overturned and abortion became illegal again? As if no one ever had an abortion before 1973.

    Many medical procedures are not difficult to
    learn. But I never heard of the cult. And I tried to keep up with all the weirdo causes.

    There’s really no need for medical abortions in California. Pennyroyal a very effective sure thing abortion plant grows wild and as a lawn ground cover all over the state. A wonderful and beautiful little ground cover if you don’t want the expense and trouble of a grass lawn. Only grows about one to at three inches high. So never needs to be mowed. Never needs to be watered although a little watering makes it thrive. Never gets yellow in rainless California summer’s as grass does. Does ok in shade and foggy coastal areas. Does better in hot sunny inland areas. If you lived in the Bay Area you saw it all the time everywhere, both cultivated and growing wild all over.

  167. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Je Suis Omar Mateen

    Looks like the last known riot was two weeks ago.

    Prediction vs. result. Facts, contrary to expectations, are part of logic.

    Here’s some more of the verboten stuff: when you deploy the riot police at a riot, it stops. To have the riot ongoing, you have to specifically order the riot police not to stop it. For whatever reason, they didn’t allow the abortion riots, so they ended on day 2.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
How America was neoconned into World War IV
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?