Finally, Dunderhoff is upping his AI game. This is exactly how I pictured this news story.

One of the problems the Jews have with AI is that an open source AI model will tell people about Holocaust math or racial IQ statistics.

But they also want to use robots to brainwash people into believing in their stupid hoaxes.

The Guardian:

Whether it is the mistaken idea that the moon landings never happened or the false claim that Covid jabs contain microchips, conspiracy theories abound, sometimes with dangerous consequences.

Those are two stupid theories.

Well, except the Moon landing. That’s a hoax.

Also, to be fair, I don’t know that the covid vax doesn’t contain microchips. I don’t think it does, but it might.

Now researchers have found that such beliefs can be altered by a chat with artificial intelligence (AI).

“Conventional wisdom will tell you that people who believe in conspiracy theories rarely, if ever, change their mind, especially according to evidence,” said Dr Thomas Costello, a co-author of the study from American University.

…

“The AI knew in advance what the person believed and, because of that, it was able to tailor its persuasion to their precise belief system,” said Costello.

Well, two can play at that game.

I am already deploying bots to make people think the Moon landing was fake and vaccines contain microchips.

My bots are also warning people about seed oils and condoms.

Writing in the journal Science, Costello and colleagues reported how they carried out a series of experiments involving 2,190 participants with a belief in conspiracy theories.

…

“About one in four people who began the experiment believing a conspiracy theory came out the other end without that belief,” said Costello.

Oh, come on.

That’s fake.

“In most cases, the AI can only chip away – making people a bit more sceptical and uncertain – but a select few were disabused of their conspiracy entirely.”

The researchers added that reducing belief in one conspiracy theory appeared to reduce participants’ belief in other such ideas, at least to a small degree, while the approach could have applications in the real world – for example, AI could reply to posts relating to conspiracy theories on social media.

Are they going to build reeducation centers run by robots?

They probably won’t have to.

They can just track everyone online who believes things the government doesn’t like, and then send robots into their DMs, like, “hey, buddy, I just wanted to talk to you about some comments you made about vaccines…”

They use these examples of “Moon landing” and “vax microchips” in the article to distract from what they actually want to do, which is make people believe obvious falsehoods, like Jewish victimhood, global warming, and democracy.

(They also want them to believe vaccines are safe, but “microchip vaccines” was always a fake theory designed to make vaccine skeptics look stupid.)

The biggest threat to the government is information. I’ve said that from the beginning.

There has been much hand-wringing & consternation about the fact that we need to regulate AI. But much less so about how to actually do it.

The example set by the FDA is one we should closely consider, @Emilia_Javorsky argues.https://t.co/zg8xzi3PjG

— Noema Magazine (@NoemaMag) September 9, 2024

There are a lot more citizens than there are cops, so this system is entirely based on people believing in it.

If people stopped believing, you could never have enough cops to control them.