◄►◄❌►▲ ▼▲▼ • BNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
The underlying motives behind U.S. involvement in Taiwan are complex and deeply rooted in historical context. The U.S. has historically viewed Taiwan as a strategic partner following the Chinese Civil War, where the island became a stronghold for the Kuomintang nationalists. However, as Taiwan's economic ties with the mainland have strengthened, the narrative of defending democracy becomes increasingly tenuous. The political landscape shifted dramatically with the election of Tsai Ing-wen in 2016, whose administration has been perceived as more confrontational towards China. Critics argue that U.S. President Joe Biden’s policies have exacerbated tensions, particularly through military maneuvers and arms sales to Taiwan that provoke Chinese reactions.
Furthermore, there is a narrative suggesting that the U.S. is manufacturing a crisis in the Taiwan Strait as a pretext for broader geopolitical objectives. The argument posits that the U.S. aims to undermine the Chinese government, using Taiwan as a catalyst for conflict that could destabilize the region and shift global power dynamics. This perspective paints the U.S. as a rogue state, intent on global dominance through chaotic intervention rather than fostering cooperation among nations. Critics assert that the U.S. is increasingly isolated and its aggressive posturing is not only counterproductive but also viewed unfavorably by many nations that seek a multipolar world order.
The underlying sentiment in these discussions reflects a broader frustration with U.S. foreign policy, which many perceive as driven by ideological motivations rather than pragmatic solutions. The insistence on promoting certain social values, such as LGBTQ+ rights, is seen by some as incompatible with the diverse cultural identities of various nations, leading to increased animosity towards the U.S. As tensions rise, the prospect of either a peaceful resolution or a significant conflict looms large, with many observers advocating for a re-evaluation of the U.S. role on the global stage to prevent an impending crisis. The future of U.S.-China relations and Taiwan's fate hinges on whether mutual understanding and cooperation can replace the current trajectory of confrontation.
## I. Introduction
A. Shift in U.S. rhetoric regarding China from trade to military confrontation.
B. Statement by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul on military response if China attacks Taiwan.
## II. McCaul's Statements on Military Action
A. Congressional authorization for military action against China if Taiwan is attacked.
1. McCaul's commentary from Taipei during a bipartisan visit.
2. Condition of American public support influencing Congress's decision.
B. McCaul's assertion that conflict is a last resort.
1. Purpose of the U.S. delegation to Taiwan as deterrence against China.
2. Historical context of U.S.-China relations and the significance of Taiwan.
## III. Critique of U.S. Justifications for Military Action
A. Skepticism towards the narrative of defending democracy.
1. Suggestion that it serves as a pretext for war.
2. Critique of American public's understanding and support for military action.
B. Examination of Taiwan's historical context.
1. U.S. influence on Taiwan post-1940s communist revolution.
2. Taiwan as a U.S. base for influence against mainland China.
C. Economic and cultural factors driving Taiwan's relationship with China.
1. Recent trends towards reunification and cooperation between Taiwan and mainland.
2. Political shifts influenced by the election of Tsai Ing-wen in 2016.
## IV. Escalation of Tensions under Biden Administration
A. Biden's approach towards Taiwan and China.
1. Lifting of restrictions on U.S.-Taiwan relations.
2. Increased military support and provocative actions towards China.
B. Impact of U.S. actions on Chinese military response.
1. Perception of U.S. as the aggressor in escalating tensions.
## V. Analysis of U.S. Strategic Objectives
A. Questioning the validity of U.S. objectives in Taiwan.
1. Assertion that U.S. created the current conflict.
2. Allegation that U.S. aims to destabilize China for global dominance.
B. Critique of U.S. actions as rogue state behavior.
1. Contrast with international norms of cooperation among nations.
2. Perception of the U.S. as a destabilizing force globally.
## VI. Global Perspective on U.S. Actions
A. World view of U.S. aggressiveness.
1. Perception that China is not the aggressor and has shown restraint.
2. Growing global frustration with U.S. interventions and conflicts.
B. Contrast between U.S. values and traditional identities worldwide.
1. Discussion on the implications of U.S. cultural values on foreign relations.
2. The role of LGBTQ+ rights in shaping U.S. alliances and hostilities.
## VII. Historical Context of U.S. Foreign Policy
A. Reflection on past U.S. efforts for peace (e.g., North Korea negotiations).
B. Comparison of Trump’s foreign policy approach with that of other U.S. leaders.
1. Trump’s focus on peaceful coexistence versus aggressive U.S. strategies.
2. Criticism of bipartisan consensus favoring conflict over diplomacy.
## VIII. Conclusion
A. Speculation on future outcomes of U.S.-China tensions.
1. Possible resolutions through peaceful means or large-scale conflict.
2. Call for nations to resist U.S. global influence and assert independence.
B. Final thoughts on the necessity for a re-evaluation of global alliances and strategies.
This outline summarizes the article's main points regarding the evolving tensions between the U.S. and China, particularly surrounding Taiwan, while critiquing the justifications for U.S. military posturing and exploring the implications of these actions on global relations.
🇺🇸 🇹🇼 🇨🇳Sending US troops to Taiwan is "on the table," says Chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs of the US Michael McCaul pic.twitter.com/b5EDQ7d3Rr
— AZ 🛰🌏🌍🌎 (@AZgeopolitics) April 8, 2023
Well, that escalated quickly.
Seriously – a couple years ago, Donald Trump was the president, and the whole discussion about China was around trade. Now they’re just openly threatening China with war?
What is the purpose of this?
RT:
US Congress would authorize a direct military confrontation with China if Beijing launched an attack against Taiwan, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul told Fox News on Friday evening. The Texas Republican representative was talking from Taipei during a three-day bipartisan delegation visit to the self-governing island.
American lawmakers would consent to putting boots on the ground if people in the US support the measure, McCaul said, without elaborating on how exactly such support would be measured. “If communist China invaded Taiwan, it would certainly be on the table and something that would be discussed by Congress and with the American people,” he said, adding that “if the American people support this, the Congress will follow.”
Yeah, because discussing things with the American people is something that happens in America.
I’m being sarcastic, by the way. That does not happen, ever. The government does whatever it wants and people just have to take it.
That said, at this point, Americans are so fat, and so obsessed with anal sex, that they probably do support war with China because they view all healthy heterosexuals as an existential threat to their existence.
However, McCaul insisted that a “conflict is always a last resort” and described the US delegation’s visit as a way to “provide deterrence to China.” US-Chinese relations have previously been strained by the visits of American delegations to Taiwan, which China considers an inalienable part of its sovereign territory.
The representative also maintained that discussions about a potential use of force by America in the Indo-Pacific region serve as a “deterrent for peace” since “you don’t have NATO in the Pacific.” Doing otherwise would mean inviting “aggression and war,” McCaul claimed.
Okay, so.
Let’s see.
There are so many different layers of bullshit here. It’s all very obvious and well-understood by me, but apparently, it’s not obvious to everyone.
Firstly, I guess everyone gets that the whole “defending democracy” thing is nonsense. No one cares about democracy, and no one even knows what the word means. Civilian supporters of democracy support it because they love gay sex, while government people use it as an excuse for war and terrorism.
So, obviously, this is about some “strategic objectives.” But that is also total bullshit, and I’m going to tell you why.
Everyone understands that Taiwan is effectively a US occupation of a part of China. The US helped nationalists flee to Taiwan during and after the communist revolution of Mao in the 1940s, and then established it as a US base of influence inside China. The claim at the time was that Taiwan’s government was a competing government – the “Republic of China” contrasted to the mainland’s “People’s Republic of China.” The goal was for the Taiwan government to somehow eventually become the government of all of China.
In general, however, Taiwanese people liked being a part of this project not because of some vague, confusing, convoluted “values,” but because Taiwan was financially better off than the mainland. In recent years, with the mainland establishing a better quality of life, and people getting very rich, the lines between Taiwan and the mainland had started to dissolve. There was open movement between the two places, with all kinds of business going back and forth. The KMT, which is the party of the nationalists who founded Taiwan, is pretty much in support of full reunification under the mainland government of Xi Jinping, because that is viewed as what is best economically and culturally for the people of Taiwan.
So, everything was fine and well. These two parts of China were moving toward reunification. However, there was some uneasiness, and the mainland did not really care. In the 1970s, the US had already recognized the “One China Policy,” which says that there is only one China, and the goal is eventual reunification. There was no need for a rush.
Things started to deteriorate in 2016 with the election of that ugly old bitch Tsai. She is a warmongering figure, associated with the neocons.
But, though her election was a negative event, everyone realized she was not going to be in power for long, because the tides had turned towards peace between Chinamen.
Then, all of a sudden, Joe Biden takes office, and he starts going totally nuts. With this horrible woman Tsai, he starts purposefully aggravating the mainland government for no reason. He starts sailing warships in and out, he starts flying warplanes back and forth, he starts making all of these outrageous claims, at one point going so far as to say that Taiwan is an independent country. Saying that is considered an act of war by the CCP government, because it actually is a kind of soft declaration of war.
Biden first, in 2021, lifted any restrictions on limiting the US relationship with Taiwan. Then he started aggressively arming the Taiwanese government, and he sent in Nancy Pelosi to create this horrible, humiliating scene for the CCP.
China of course had to respond to this, and military exercises began, and you get to where we are now.
The point is: the entire problem was created by the United States. The problem was first created in the 1940s – maybe with good intentions – and that was naturally resolving itself until, in 2021, they started escalating the aggression.
Now we’re at the point where the government is openly threatening China with war.
Insofar as the US has “strategic objectives” in Taiwan, those objectives were not under threat until the US started aggravating the situation, and forced China to respond.
The only way any of this makes any sense is if the obvious is true: the United States is intent on overthrowing the government of China, and they are using Taiwan as a wedge to bring about a conflict which, they believe, will result in the collapse of the mainland government.
The reason they would want this is that they want clear global dominance, and do not want any other system threatening their “democracy” order of gay sex, feminism, and submission to Jews and Jewish values.
Overthrowing foreign governments, especially when they are not hostile and were up until recently considered an ally, is not a valid “strategic objective” in a world of cooperating nations. These are the actions of a rogue state.
The thing is: the entire world sees what the US is doing. Everyone, save for the fat, gay Americans, are able to see that China is not the aggressor, China has shown extreme restraint, and the US has been fixated on creating and then escalating tensions.
In general, the world is getting pretty sick of the United States going around the world and making problems for people. We are living in a technological age. There is no reason for the backward barbarism that the US represents. Nations can and should be cooperating as independent nations, but the US is fixated on a globalist order where there are no nations, no races, no religions or identities – they want everything to be subservient to a godless world system controlled by Jews.
The rainbow flag is the absolute symbol of Jewish dominion over nations. Support of gay anal sex is incompatible with any religion, with every traditional identity. If you fly the rainbow flag, you are submitting to the globalist system entirely by denying every aspect of your identity. That is why they are so obsessed with gay sex, and why gay sex seems to be the core meaning of “democracy.”
The US is allied with every country that flies the gay flag, and is now hostile towards every country that does not fly the gay flag. Previously, the US had relations with Islamic countries that were anti-gay, but those relationships have all but ended entirely.
This is all clearly coming to some kind of head, given that the US is becoming both increasingly isolated and increasingly hostile towards the outside world (everyone outside of Europe, Australia, and Japan).
The US is responsible for all of this. Every other nation – including even North Korea – has tried to make peace with the US, and the US has slapped away any and all gestures of the kind.
Remember when Trump wanted to reunite the Koreas, and Kim was on-board with that? Remember when John Bolton went in and sabotaged the whole thing, for literally no reason other than a disposition towards global war?
This is really the core of the difference between Trump and every other American politician: he wanted a peaceful and prosperous world, where nations are allowed to exist, and everyone else in the US government – including and maybe even especially the Republicans – want to dominate the world and force everyone to have gay sex with men.
The only solution at this point is for the US to fall on its face, to be removed from the world stage, and for independent nations to come together and refuse to be a part of this “anal world order.”
We are seeing it happen now. Everyone is coming together, other than the Western nations who are deep into anal.
The situation will be resolved peacefully or through a massive world war, but it will be resolved relatively soon.

RSS










