The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
Please Stop Talking About "Democracy"
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
“We going to build back so much better, you’re going to get tired of building back better. You’re going to say ‘Mr. Biden, please, we can’t keep building back better,’ and I’m gonna say ‘sorry, we have to keep building back better.’ We gotta do it, folks. Gotta do it.”

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Democracy” is a spook.

I am philosophically anti-intellectual, but some of these concepts, you really do just need to understand. I am not a post-Hegelian individualist anarchist, but the Max Stirner spooks meme is useful in basic discourse.

Spooks are useful and necessary abstract concepts needed to structure a human social order. Even the most primitive African tribes have spooks, which is how the Catholic Church ultimately decided that they were human beings with souls and not animals (it was a hot topic of debate).

The ability to rationally build abstract thought forms outside of the concrete world is what separates humans from animals and what it means when the Bible says that “man is made in the image of God.” Spooks are a framework through which to shape and improve physical reality.

Here’s the problem with democracy: it is too spooky to be a functional spook. It is a busted spook. It has been abstracted from an abstraction so many times that no one has any idea what it means. For contrast, “freedom” also has structural problems as an abstract, but at least people have some basic agreement that it means “options for individuals.” People disagree with which options people should have, but the basic idea of “the ability to exercise agency” is understood.

“Democracy” means literally anything to anyone. On one end, it means “universal suffrage rights” and on the other end it means “gay sex lessons for kids.” This is always getting mixed up, on purpose, so you get situations where the media and government claim that democracy is about “maximizing voting rights” and then turn around and claim people are “voting against democracy.” If democracy is popular vote, then it is actually impossible to “vote against democracy.”

The bottom line is: no one is willing to offer a definition of this term. At least no one on the left is willing to do so. They prefer to keep it as a nebulous blob of compounded and conflicting abstractions.

What’s more: America was never intended to be a “democracy.” We didn’t have universal suffrage until the late 19th century. Women did not get national universal suffrage rights until 1920 (though that is a separate issue, technically).

Democracy in its most “official” form is outlined by the United Nations in their Universal Declaration of Human Rights, almost none of which are currently associated with the term as it is commonly used by the left. I am against all forms of democracy, as it is always an oligarchy, which always reduces personal freedom. Even in its pure form, the masses will vote away other people’s right and vote away their own rights because the masses are stupid cattle.

But if we talk about “democracy going away” – that means different things to different people. Republicans now try to push the original definitions of democracy, but also say that importing new voters is a violation of democracy. Democrats literally mean that restrictions on abortion and child gay sex, if they were voted for, would destroy democracy.

What that means is that if one side gets their ideal of democracy, the other side loses it. So people’s opinions here are completely irrelevant in any real sense, and the fact that most people in both parties now believe democracy is ending just means that no one is comfortable with the current direction of society.

New York Post:

More than half of self-identified Democrats and Republicans believe the US will no longer be a “democracy” at some point in the future, according to a new poll.

The striking findings were reported in a Yahoo News/YouGov survey which found 55% of Democrats and 53% of Republicans said it was “likely” the US will “cease to be a democracy in the future.”

It was unclear how the poll defined “democracy.” The US is officially a constitutional federal republic where states run direct elections for most high offices — though not, most notably, for president.

When independents and the non-affiliated were factored in, the depressing notion was shared by 49% of all respondents — while only 25% said they consider the end of democracy to be “unlikely,” while another 25% said they were unsure.

In addition, 60% of Democrats and 61% of Republicans believe America is becoming a “less democratic country.”

Both political sides also believe they were treated more fairly “in the past” than now – 71% of Republicans and 50% of Democrats agreed with that statement.

Additionally, the poll found that 52% of Republicans, 50% of independents and 46% of Democrats believe “there will be a civil war in the United States in [their] lifetime.”

lol.

While there appears to be bipartisan hopelessness for the future of America, respondents were quick to blame the other side for the present predicament.

A plurality of Republicans — 30% — described Democrats as “out of touch with reality,” while 25% claimed they were a “threat to America.” Another 8% see the Democratic Party as “immoral” and 4% said it was a “threat to me personally.”

Democrats’ opinions of the GOP were similar, with 27% calling the Republican Party “out of touch with reality,” 23% saying they are a “threat to America,” 7% claiming the GOP is “immoral” and 4% calling it a “threat to me personally.”

I don’t know how only 4% consider the opposite party a threat to them personally. I view both parties as a threat to me personally.

But this split ultimately can be reduced to the exact same boring, obvious point:

  • The right believes reality is what it is, and you have to deal with it, and
  • The left believes man can be perfected and a utopia can be created on earth

The right, typically, wants to be left alone to figure out their lives for themselves, while the left believes that a collective utopian mission is necessary for society. That ultimately comes back to a metaphysical question: does man have a personal relationship to the divine? If so, he should be left alone to figure it out. If not, then the individual is a blob of cells irrelevant to the greater utopian project.

Of course: it is only a fraction of a fraction of the population that understands this dichotomy, and most are going on instinct. The core instincts surround two distinct spooks that have actual clear meaning:

  • Left: desire for hedonistic pleasures to maximize “happiness”
  • Right: belief in order to maximize “personal autonomy”

Simply: the left is feminine, the right is masculine.

  • Women and men with feminine spirits do not have any conception of higher purpose, so the only thing they can think about is physical pleasures – their brains releasing happiness chemicals.
  • Men with higher ideals understand that life is suffering, and the only way to live a meaningful life is to confront challenges and overcome them. To confront and overcome challenges, you have to be left alone, and free to confront dangers on your own terms.

Those remain the core drivers behind popular sentiments.

However, a secondary issue changes all of this in the political realm: the Republican Party isn’t really “right-wing” – at all.

You see this in the gun control debate:

  • The Democrats want to ban guns to stop shootings
  • The Republicans want to do background checks and militarize schools, further expand and militarize the police, and basically turn society into a gigantic prison in order to stop shootings while allowing people the “right” to own a gun

On its face, the Republican plan actually appears to reduce your freedoms more than the Democrat plan. The Ted Cruz bill to expand NICS, for example, doesn’t simply violate the Second Amendment, but also the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The same is true of “red flag laws,” which many Republicans are supporting.

The actual right-wing position is:

“The world is not perfect and sometimes people get shot.”

Clearly, you should try to reduce deaths through reasonable means, but the left is saying “if it saves one life,” which is a utopianist slogan. The logical end to utopian thinking is to put everyone in a very safe pod with a wire going into their brain to regulate the chemicals in their brain to keep them in a constant state of happiness.

The two worldviews are completely incompatible with one another. The right wants to be left alone and the left wants to control everyone.

“Democracy” is completely irrelevant to all of this. It is a busted spook. Anyone talking about democracy – including Tucker Carlson, by the way – is simply confusing the core issues.

If everyone understood the differences between right and left, we would be much closer to figuring this out – and the logical thing to do would be to split the country. Instead, everyone thinks there is going to be a civil war, because they understand there are irreconcilable differences, but they do not have the language to explicate these differences, and instead just keep on babbling about “democracy.”

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 265 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The Democratic Party

    Believes

    That

    Democracy=LEGAL IMMIGRANTS from India

    To America….breed and produce and Hindu geneline on US Soil

    Then on Nov 3 every 4 years

    In the voting both to….the Hindus in our America

    1)Nullify the Native White Working Class Vote

    2)Vote Whitey into a violently persecuted White Racial Minority within the borders of America…

    This is Nancy Pelosi’s idea of Democracy in on action…

  2. restrictions on abortion and child gay sex

    AA, why have you put those to things in the same bottle? It is arguable that the woman is sovereign of her own body, the state, therefore, not. That if abortion is a mortal sin the punishment for it will come from God. But someone feeding on a little child’s way of learning and going way beyond the tooth fairy to way, way pre-puberty sexualization and adding perversion to that … different bottle.

  3. JR Foley says:

    Democracy works —??? How can it work when more than 50% of the eligible voters do not cast a ballot??? In Taiwan—Chiang Kai Shek ran a Democracy. Voters flocked to polling station–got their ballot —went to cubicle–opened ballot and there was ONE Name –and it was NOT “Batman” !!!!

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @follyofwar
  4. saggy says: • Website

    Democracy, i.e. letting the hoi polloi decide important issues of state, is preposterous on its face. So, I agree with Anglin, let’s stop talking about democracy.

    Now that that is settled, please stop talking about ‘left’ and ‘right’.

  5. Democracy has its weaknesses but is not that bad a system; if it were the United States would not have lasted over 200 years of steadily rising wealth and power…

    The main problem is that Democracy breaks down when the population becomes strongly divided, happened in 1860 with slavery and would doubtless happen again today with our current ethnic balkanization…

    This is besides the point however, because the fact is that what we have now in the USA is much closer to OLIGARCHY than democracy; elections and representation are but the surface manifestations of democracy; in a real democracy the people have a voice in power; here and today they have NONE, one dollar, one vote is the rule of the game..so please stop dumping on democracy, it is not perfect but it is also no longer the system we live under in anything but name…

  6. @saggy

    No, there really are distinctive mindsets out there, and Anglin does a good job at drawing the distinctions. IMO, another distinction is social: leftists love humanity but hate humans, and rightists love humans but hate humanity. Leftists tend to be herd animals, rightists tend to be pack animals. Rightists tend to have concentric circles of loyalty, such that by the time you get to the Horn of Africa, we really couldn’t care less. Leftists will weep over starving Somalians while ignoring their countrymen 10 miles away who can no longer get subcontracting work because they don’t speak Spanish and insist on a 1099. Leftists view history as linear and progressive. Rightists view history as cyclical and man’s baseline as, well, rather base without higher inspiration and challenge.

    Both mindsets probably have significant hereditary inputs as well. We really are looking at things from different worlds. You are no more going to convince a leftist of the reality of human neurodiversity than you could convince a dog that a cooked steak is bad for it.

    IMO, lots of people who register Republican are leftists who are totally bought in to the democratic, blank slate, progressivist vision. Their only beef with the Democrats is on tactics and religious preference (Reform Judaism, wokeism v. Protestant and Catholic Christianity) and which groups get to wet their beaks.

    • Thanks: HammerJack
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  7. Pointing out that women and feminized men think differently from regular men gets to the fatal flaw of universal suffrage.

    They can’t admit their feels are being manipulated by the serpent in the tree.

    • Agree: Patrick in SC
  8. To the globalists, Democracy means they make the rules, we follow them. Like abortion and transgender surgery for children, which are the two most fundamental and important rights anybody can imagine! Freedom to travel and to refuse medical procedures, not so much. Any country that to some degree follows the will of the people – Russia, Iran, Venezuela – is evil and must be overthrown. (Interesting how those oligarchies get closer to the so-called democratic ideal.)

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  9. @saggy

    Agreed.

    This article pretty much epitomizes Anglin. He correctly points out how meaningless and nebulous the word “Democracy” has become, while failing to notice or understand that the terms “Left” and “Right” have become equally meaningless.

    Left and Right are teammates, they just focus on different areas. The Left sets the agenda and gets the domestic audience aboard. They get the marches for kindergarten gay sex classes or whatever going. Then the Right takes the ball with their fake patriotism and military worship. The Right says any sovereign country who doesn’t accept Jews as their masters and implement kindergarten gay sex classes must be bombed back to the stone age. (This is essentially the entire essence of Fox Jews, Kikebart, Zionhedge, etc.)

    Meanwhile, the “Right” and “Left” pretend to differ on irrelevant nonsense in order to distract the stupid goyim. Your average Amerimutt literally believes that by watching both CNN and Fox Jews, they get all sides of the story.

    • Agree: Robert Bruce
    • Replies: @Lurker
  10. @War for Blair Mountain

    Democracy in America=Hindu Race Power in America…

    And the old farting Italian Granny Pelosi supports this…along with Han Race Power in America…And Pakistani Muslim Race Power in America….

    • Replies: @denk
  11. The two worldviews are completely incompatible with one another. The right wants to be left alone and the left wants to control everyone.

    Are fascists not right-wing?

    I think the problem lies in mentality. There are “Control Freaks” (CF) and there are “Live and Let Live” (LLL) folk.

    The problems come when the CF get together and decide they’re going to use the State to force everyone to adopt their values (be it Marxist, fascist, Judeofascist, neocon, shi*tlib, etc). Often, but not always, this is done to control the wealth and resources of society. And there’s always a cause. (Oy! Oy! We have to save the ______!”)

    On the other hand, the LLL folk don’t want to control everyone, and their apathy in this regard turns them into easy marks for CF’s. They become “goyim,” and goyim are easily turned into “golem.”

    My thoughts on this dilemma? Target the ultimate ((Control Freaks)) and thus demonstrate how Junior Control Freaks are kikes, too. “Shame” the public for being kike.

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @Alrenous
    , @Anon
    , @Sisifo
    , @Xafer
  12. c matt says:
    @DeclineoftheAmericanEmpire

    Any system is only as good as the people running/involved in it. As the people decline, so does the system.

  13. Sagging tits farting Italian Granny Nancy Pelosi likes this kind of Democracy:

    THE GREAT REPLACEMENT

    WHITE GENOCIDE

    And if you don’t like this kind of Democracy

    Old farting Granny Nancy Pelosi…..Will fart in your general direction…

    Nancy Pelosi…carrying out JFKs dream of WHITE REPLACEMENT AND WHITE GENOCIDE….

  14. @Fidelios Automata

    To the globalists, Democracy means they make the rules, we follow them. . . . Any country that to some degree follows the will of the people – Russia, Iran, Venezuela – is evil and must be overthrown. (Interesting how those oligarchies get closer to the so-called democratic ideal.)

    In this discussion, Michael Hudson makes explicit the taxonomy Fidelios Automata implied:
    Globalism = democracies by force (as deployed against the German people 1933 – 1950 — see Capturing the German Eye); oligarchies are those that resist globalist democratization.

    • Thanks: Fidelios Automata
  15. Tucker is great, his program many magnitudes better than anything else on tv, but when he champions “democracy,” nearly every show, it always makes me wince.

  16. Cowboy says:

    Democracy, as it is practiced today, is a simple formula.

    Law + Order = Democracy

    Basically mob rule. Who makes the law and enforces the order is the winner. Minority losers will necessarily be subject to pain. There use to be a time when due process would mitigate against the harm done to the minority party. No longer. The courts are now abridging those rights. Now that the courts have gone political it’s strictly a power play.

    The only way to abate the power play is to fragment it.

    Which State will be the first to have a majority popular vote to succeed from the Union?

  17. Alrenous says: • Website

    most people in both parties now believe democracy is ending just means that no one is comfortable with the current direction of society

    Americans treat the government like their mom. Winning an election means winning mommy’s love.

    When mommy can only love one of two children at any time, the family is dysfunctional. This is not lost on the kids.

    When she changes her mind, it reveals she in fact never loved either of them. It’s just manipulation. She wants them so desperate for approval it consumes every waking thought; they can never consider disobedience.
    The kids sometimes fool themselves, because they’re that desperate for love. What with not getting it from their actual, biological parents. However, this sort of self-deception has a shelf life. You can only push it so far before it expires.

  18. @saggy

    Democracy, i.e. letting the hoi polloi decide important issues of state, is preposterous on its face.

    Democracy worked as it was originally designed, in Athens and colonial US: the only people allowed to vote were those who knew the difference btw “the hoi polloi” and “hoi polloi.”

    • Replies: @Alrenous
    , @geokat62
  19. @Pure Coincidence

    “‘democracy” means that Native Born White Americans must worship the constitution and be aracial…..…….while Hindus and Han in America engage in race-based political activism within the borders of America…

    La Raza had an office in the Kenyan Foreigner’s White House for 8 years….La Raza…The Race….

  20. The ability to rationally build abstract thought forms outside of the concrete world is what separates humans from animals and what it means when the Bible says that “man is made in the image of God.” Spooks are a framework through which to shape and improve physical reality.

    You claim to be an anti-intellectual, but this is a damn fine summary of Stirner. That makes sense, since Stirner himself despised professional “philosophers” as just more people deluded by spooks.

    Stirner on how “to shape and improve physical reality” through owning one’s spooks:

    https://counter-currents.com/2019/05/a-word-from-the-wise-guy-part-one/

    Arguably, Stirner was the first Edge Lord and Meme Master.

    https://counter-currents.com/2019/04/max-stirner-marxist-meme-master-or-mentor-part-one/

  21. @Cowboy

    When California goes it’s own way as a nation…California will have a billionaire Iranian born in Iran President……At that point in time…the Native Born White American Working Class will be justified in declaring war against California…

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  22. You could have said that Left and Right are artificial ideas to begin with.

    There’s no Left and Right, it’s a pair of scales they put their load of bullshit on.

    The Gnostics – the original ones, considered than mankind is composed of three kinds of people.

    The first and the most numerous kind are somatics, material people, matter-bound beings incapable of comprehension.

    The second kind are spiritual people, people of emotional intelligence capable of comprehension. These are outnumbered about one to ten.

    And the last kind are exceptional people, who are not matter-bound – pneumatics, people of pure spirit.

    So if that’s how it is, and there’s no reason to assume it isn’t, then popular vote is the rule of somatics.

    Therefore it’s evil.

    And besides, the original teaching of the New Testament is all about that. The first Christians were Gnostics.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  23. Alrenous says: • Website

    I am philosophically anti-intellectual

    Very democratic of you.

    Get intellectual so you don’t accidentally start fights with yourself.
    If you can’t get intellectual, hire someone to think on your behalf.

    Spooks are useful

    Spooks are Satanism. They are lies.

    The root cause of democracy is Sophistry.

    no one has any idea what it means.

    Hello, my middle name is “no one,” how are you?

    [MORE]
    Democracy is consent of the governed. Under democracy, the government is supposed to have to make a majority of the subjects agree to let it do anything it wants to do.

    Divine right of king mob.

    So, democracy(1) and democracy(2). The explicit formal definition is democracy(1), and it is indeed a spook. E.g. Arrow’s impossibility theorem; you can prove democracy(1) is impossible many different ways. However, attempting democracy(1) always leads to a very particular democracy(2), as the Sophists intend.

    Plato knows what democracy(2) is: “If oligarchy is greedy for money, so is democracy greedy for absolute freedom; it recognizes no authority whatever, neither familial nor militaristic nor academic.” Nor physics, biology, sociology, nor even Logic herself.

    (Of course democracy is defined logically, which means democrats, of all people, don’t know what democracy is. Or anything else, really. Ignorance uber alles.)

    The root cause of democracy is Sophistry. Some smart Machiavellians want to steal money from slightly less-smart rich people (because they have all the money) and therefore put forward egalitarianism and democracy(1) so that they can launder their opinions through the stupid and gullible masses.

    Plato was softballing it. Democracy(2) is inherently irresponsible. Democracy is lies. Democracy is Satanism.

    Thus the prepubscent pornography.

    but also say that importing new voters is a violation of democracy

    As of course it is. First, can’t print new shares without consulting the original shareholders. Second, debasing the currency.

    But if we talk about “democracy going away” – that means different things to different people.

    They’re just lying. “Associate this applause light with my personal power, please.” “Okay boss.” Sophists gonna Soph.

    the fact that most people in both parties now believe democracy is ending just means that no one is comfortable with the current direction of society.

    In shocking news, with Satanism, everyone loses.

    N.B. Both Anglin’s left and Anglin’s “right” are irresponsible.
    In a genuine right-wing polity, there is no debate, nor does there need to be any debate. Self-ownership means whatever you choose for yourself doesn’t affect me. Think what you want; it doesn’t matter unless you try to think you own me, in which case my security firm will have words with you until you change your mind.

  24. “I am against all forms of democracy, as it is always an oligarchy,”

    Here is one root of the problem.

    Politicians must conduct “campaigns” to persuade the voters to vote for them. Monied interests provide the money for those campaigns. Consequently, and logically, the politician once elected, understands that he/she must serve the monied interests in order to keep “his/her job”. He/she knows — it’s axiomatic — that if they do not serve their donor, the campaign funding will be withdrawn and given to a more obedient/compliant opposing politician. In this fashion politicians are bought, kept bought, and pass laws that enable the rich to become ever richer, while the proles, restricted to “bread and circuses” and shiny things, are lied to … and slave away .

    The other root of the problem: those same monied interests must necessarily maintain control of the cultural narrative, which they achieve through ownership of the various media. Thus they control what the polity thinks and believes. By this “mind-control”, the masses, go zombie-like to the polls and vote for one of the two “approved-by-the-wealthy” candidates. Thus controlled, and made docile by the illusion of their political agency, they acquiesce in their enslavement.

    **************************************************

    Democracy might have a chance against oligarchy if the masses could be effectively educated rather than indoctrinated — education and media removed from control by the wealthy — and if the wealthy could be prevented from buying politicians.

    Final note: the jews are the preeminent masters of the subversion of democracy through the purchase of politicians. They’ve been at it — perfected it — over several thousand years. In fact, perfected it against all the forms of governance that predated “democracy”.

    In the current age they ***OWN*** every single Western “liberal democracy”, first and foremost the United States: the UK, Canada, Australia, and every country on the European continent (except Russia since Putin came to power, though they most certainly work to gain “influence”, if not control. I often wonder to what extent Putin understands the degree to which the jews are behind the jew-subverted West’s obsession with the destruction of Russia.)

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @geokat62
  25. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Chris Moore

    Are fascists not right-wing?

    They’re not, no.

    The only reason the Nazis, the National Socialists, are considered right-wing is because Stalin needed someone to blame for getting so many Russians killed in unnecessary meatgrinder tactics. The USSA, naturally, leapt to assist their brother in Fascism with this new and exciting lie.

    [MORE]

    In the USSA, only masculine Fascism is Fascism; feminine Fascism is “democracy” instead. In the USSR, masculine Fascism was Communism or Fascism based on whether Stalin was in charge of it.

    Communism, Fascism, or Democracy are all based on demotism; the idea that the People own the State and ultimately the purpose of the State is to serve the People. All of them have elections. All of them are in fact Satanism, based on flagrant lies. The only real distinction is how hard they go on the lies.

    The solution is to notice that Satanist States are weak. America wants to be oppressive but accidentally legalized freedom.

    Adblock is a good immediate example.
    Advertisements are clearly bad civilization. So….use adblock. Problem solved. Withdraw consent; it just works.

    You can just not take the vaccine.
    You can just not abort your own kid.
    You can just not send your kid to school.
    You can just not separate from the kid’s mom.
    You can just not watch the news, and just not vote.
    You can just not work for a firm with an HR department.
    If you’re really dedicated, you can be a net tax consumer.

    Democracy, despite their best efforts, still is consent of the governed. And you can just withdraw your consent. Treat the government like inclement weather. Just use an umbrella and then think about something else.

    Admittedly, the GAE is super gay and you can’t really un-gay the place. You can’t just say no homo.
    However, if revoking consent became a thing, it would get un-gayed without you having to do anything. It only remains gay because Americans are swish.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @KDE1711
    , @Dchjk
  26. @War for Blair Mountain

    Good definition of what democracy seems to mean in the U.S. of today. Who, with eyes and ears open, could deny it?

  27. Dutch Boy says:
    @Pure Coincidence

    He makes a good point that democracy is not just about voting, it is about individual people being able to make important decisions about their lives, not some corporation (capitalism) or bureaucracy (socialism). That would require power, which means economic power. Neither capitalists nor socialists want citizens to have any such power. The capitalists want to maximize their profits by minimizing their payrolls to create a serf-like working class, the socialists want to maximize their power by making the population dependent on the largesse they distribute. They work together: the capitalists squeeze the working class and the socialists supply some of the stolen wages, minus a good cut for themselves.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  28. Cowboy says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    I would give California the best odds to date for breaking from the Union. If it could get put on the ballot today I think they could get a plurality. Then again, even the Tards in SF got rid of their Soros puppet.

  29. Democracy is now currently defined in Europe as [any] country run by Jews.

    • Thanks: Katrinka
  30. Watching CornPop Joe talk must be what it’s like in a assisted care facility where the elected head of special activities is pushing for a twice daily Ice Cream break between wheelchair aerobics and afternoon nap’s.
    It can’t get anymore embarrassing than this, something’s got to give.

  31. @War for Blair Mountain

    LaRaza got what they wanted, tens of millions of “The Race” replacing us.

    Whites need to start advocating for reservations and acquiring gambling casino licenses.

    • Agree: Katrinka
    • Replies: @Richard B
  32. Anon[764] • Disclaimer says:

    Off Topic but important:

    In German Rabbinical School a big sexual abuse scandal is exposed. Long article in the German paper of record the FAZ
    https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/vorwuerfe-wegen-belaestigung-am-abraham-geiger-kolleg-18107542.html

    (use machine translation)

  33. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Here Be Dragon

    Left = irresponsible.
    Right = responsible.

    Paying with other people’s money vs. paying with your own.
    Paying for your own mistakes vs. making someone else pay.

    Theft vs. ownership.

    Involuntary leadership is inherently left-wing. Involuntary leaders aren’t fired when they lead poorly; they are irresponsible. With a fixed leftist point, all States become more leftist over time, as contradictions with the core leftism are resolved. Normally they collapse in ten generations – 250 years. It varies some due to local conditions, but the average is rock-steady.

    • Replies: @Here Be Dragon
  34. Alrenous says: • Website
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    American rightists aren’t right-wing. They’re merely not quite as radically far left as American leftists.

    Between east and north-east is east-north-east.

    DNC = left left left leftists.
    RNC = left left left rightists.

    Horseshoe theory: “Left-left-left-leftists look a lot like these left-left-leftists.”

  35. Alrenous says: • Website
    @James J. O'Meara

    Plato on the Athenian original:

    The enormously wealthy people in a declining oligarchy will probably lend out money to the poor at exorbitant rates of interest. The debtors will spend and spend; they will be encouraged to borrow and borrow.

    In such a democratic state, everyone is more or less equally free of any responsibility to anyone else, including service to the state. No one is obliged to give orders; no one is obliged to take orders; no justice can be respected or meted out.

    Although the son may not even respect money, he will probably not respect anything else; he will become shiftless, kind of a reed in the wind, unable to control his desires, which will probably fluctuate wildly. Lacking any ability to discern differences in appetite, he will probably live solely for the moment, and he will be rudderless. His will be a life without order.

    democracy is greedy for absolute freedom; it recognizes no authority whatever, neither familial nor militaristic nor academic.

    He should know, what with having lived there. P.S. Hard to blame the Jews for the state of Athens in 400 BC. Easy to blame Protagoras, by contrast. So easy e.g. Wikipedia has to go out of its way to disavow the connection.

    I believe Plato incorrectly/unjustifiably made a distinction between democracy and tyranny.

    Then the great beast will elect a popular and violent leader to do something, and he will start killing people, and he will become feared and extremely powerful. And he will become fearful, require bodyguards, build a private army, and tax the citizenry to fund his standing army. He will trust no one, certainly not men of reason or compassion. He will surround himself with criminals, and he will finally do criminal acts against the very democrats who elected him. The tyrant will despotically rule his unhappy and fearful state.

    The democrat is desirous of all things and treats all, good and bad, equally; if his son, the tyrannical man, falls into bad company — and he will — then he will be governed entirely by the bad and the desire for the bad. He will be driven by lust, and his lust will drive him completely out of control. He will eventually become something like a wild beast, his lust will become bestial, and he will do terrible things to get what he wants. No longer able to discern right from wrong, good from bad, he will turn against every man and will earn and deserve every man’s hatred and scorn. His life will be miserable.

    • Replies: @SteeringWheelHolder
  36. Kali El says: • Website

    The reality isn’t different, the perception of reality is different, that is the difference politically between right and left. To me it seems like religion is the main difference, although there are many religious leftists and agnostic or atheist people on the right. Still, mostly it can be split between those who have faith God is in control to whatever degree, and those who see the world as chaos trying to be controlled by humans. So those on the left tend to be more hysterical and controlling because they don’t see like those on the right that at the end of the day everything we do is really controlled by God since we have no idea how to control or create thoughts, thinking, and comprehension on our own.

    • LOL: RoatanBill
  37. Glinka33 says:

    Presently, the right represents the interests of the Bigs -big business, big military, big religion, big banks, big oil, big billionaires, big agribusiness, big pharma, big media, big hi-tech, etc.

    The left -which barely exists- fights for economic democracy at the workplace, locally, regionally, nationally and globally. Political democracy is mostly a joke when we live under the tyranny of money. And the hot button culture wars issues, racism, sexism, wokism, identity politics and political correctness are weapons used by big money to both divide and conquer and divert the attentions of the system’s slaves.

    • Replies: @Kim
  38. TG says:

    In Russia, the country is ruled by one man.

    In the United States, the country is ruled by the consensus decision of about 600 billionaires.

    So you see, the United States has SIX HUNDRED TIMES as much democracy as Russia!

    USA! USA! USA!

    • LOL: Charles
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  39. anon[325] • Disclaimer says:

    Now, this, from America’s preeminent public intellectual, is perhaps unduly despondent. Of course democracy is bullshit in the US, everything is bullshit in the US. That’s the US.

    As Mr. Anglin points out, in the civilized world democracy has a tightly-drafted mensurable definition in black-letter customary international law. In the Siracusa Principles. Outside the US iron curtain, all nations know and acknowledge that the Siracusa Principles define a democratic society as one in conformity with the UDHR. That of course is US federal and state common law per 175 U.S. 677. Shit-for-brains US jurists are highly trained to rigorous ignorance of stuff like that but the fact remains. So if some partisan cock knob tells you democracy is an ideal, just backhand his nuts because, like seat belts, it’s not just a good idea, it’s the law.

    The world standard is simple and amenable to periodic monitoring by UN member states or independent experts in the UPR and associated treaty bodies. Which is why the US government got kicked off the UPR review panel; and why the US government is subject to extraordinary urgent review of its systematic and widespread foreign and domestic torture and other derogations of non-derogable rights. When the US sits down for its AP Democracy exams and tries to get into democracy college, the US gets straight Fs. They couldn’t even get into The Corinthian College of Democracy and Cosmetology with a giant fucking federally-guranteed unexpungeable loan. The US is a fucking failure, a failed state.

    Now don’t blame the masses for this, because the masses are painstakingly brainwashed into politically helpless asswipes by CIA’s propaganda blueprint, PSB D-33/2 et seq. They’re brainwashed to fight each other instead of killing the regime in Langley NHB. To fix this, you need only decapitate the CIA. They’ve gone to ground for WWIII and they’re more dispersed than they were, but any old nuclear SCO power could catch em all and cook em up this:

    Ouchi!

    One Typhoon salvo’ll do it.

    So turn that frown upside down! There’s nothing wrong with our native shithole that a RISOP-like laydown can’t fix.

  40. Basic biology obviously contradicts the “self”-invented notion that Humans occur “individual”-ly in Nature. Not any Human Being has ever showed-up here all by their “self” and without at least two people getting together in that certain way to make it possible. Neither is any mated pair viable as-such, in Nature. Nor are “nuclear” or “extended” families, or even blood kin-based “clans.” The lethal vicissitudes of in-breeding sees pretty quickly to that. So the so-called “autonomous individual” is only another artifact of the Planet-wasting “civilization” disease process, along with all the various constructs by which our Kind are classified under one contrived “social system” or another.

    On the other (“left”?) hand, Humans are not by nature “herd” animals, either. Attempts to drive us into such un- and anti-natural configurations, which efforts are also always part a “self”-serving domestication process, have never failed to result finally in man-made disasters that decimate the unfortunate populations (of every Kind) subjected to them. The current and doomed-to-be-exceedingly-short-lived “global” gulag system is already visiting upon its captive muddled “masses” a level of ruthlessly administered intentional attrition effectively incomprehensible to them.

    Since both “individual” and “herd” are equally “spook”-y, applied to the actual biological organic Form of Humans, it would likely be worthwhile to find some terms that more accurately describe the actual biological configuration of our Kind suitable to fulfillment of our organic Function within Earth’s Whole Living Arrangement. This configuration needs to be such as provides for meeting the actual requirements of sustained, healthy, mutually beneficial engagement with the Living Arrangement. This includes getting together in that certain Way with similarly functional Human configurations to maintain the health and organic fitness and genetic integrity of the Living Arrangement’s Human component.

    Approaching the (for “civilized” peoples) forever-nagging-and-still-unanswered questions about the shape and content of our actual Human Nature, from a strictly biological and organic perspective, will be for them very difficult to do. The condition their Condition is in is itself a formidable barrier to such an exercise. Most appear completely in-thrall to the homocentric delusions of “exceptional”-ism. Mr. Anglin’s own reflexive resort to the commonplace “….ability to form abstract thoughts….” conceit, as the pre-supposed difference between Human animals and all other Kinds of animals here, is not just a flimsy reed for homo-exceptionalists to put so much stock in, it is observably contrary to Natural Fact. Meanwhile, among us surviving Free Wild Natural Peoples, of all Kinds, it is their own seemingly still-unplumbed capacity for “self”-delusion and mass confusion that starkly differentiates our domesticated Human relations from all “the rest” of us.

    Besides, we all do have, in our Native languages, specific words for our natural biological form. For Lakotahs, as an example, it is approximated in English as Tiyoshpaye. It might be good for some “civilized” people to choke-down some of their biologically baseless pride, and to ask some of us what we’ve learned, in ten thousand thousand generations of lived experience, about what it actually is to be Human here in Earth’s Whole Living Arrangement. Because it’s (sometimes painfully) obvious to us that right now both these “self”-captivated and “socially-engineered” sub-species alike simply haven’t got a clue.

  41. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Alrenous

    The only reason the Nazis, the National Socialists, are considered right-wing is because Stalin needed someone to blame for getting so many Russians killed in unnecessary meatgrinder tactics. The USSA, naturally, leapt to assist their brother in Fascism with this new and exciting lie.

    Were the Nazis Control Freaks or Live and Let Live?

    One can say, Yes, they were Control Freaks because ((Jews)), Bolsheviks, Imperialists…
    etc. And that would be true.

    But the ((Jews)) knew what they were doing when they baited them into fascist counter-Judeofascism.

    The ((Jews)) are attempting to bait Russia in adopting fascist counter-Judeofascism. The ((Jews)) are attempting to bait the “Deplorables” into adopting fascist counter-Judeofascism. The ((Jews)) are attempting to bait Chinese into adopting fascist counter-Judeofascism…

    As I mentioned on another thread, Jesus dealt with Judeofascist ((Jews)) by baiting them into showing their true face, and they did. They instigated his arrest and crucifixion. And his self-sacrifice worked. And it’s taken them 2,000 years to claw their way back to the top of the heap.

    And because they are Judeofascist sociopaths, and because of free speech and the Internet, and because of latent Christianity, and because of the survival imperative of other nations, and because their Zionist and Judeofascist racket and Ponzi scheme can only accommodate a certain (Judas Class) percentage of the global population without melting down, they are melting down. The Zionist racket has been stretched too thin, and is now falling to pieces before their eyes.

    But they were destined to push it too far, because that is what sociopaths do. They simply couldn’t control themselves, because behind the façade and the propaganda and all of their corrupt or like-minded Judas useful idiots they are uninhibited, uncivilized, animal-like creatures masquerading as a “civilization.”

    Satanists. Soulless. Sociopaths. Just like Jesus said they were. The Synagogue of Satan.

    • Agree: hardlooker
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  42. Franz says:

    The pointy heads have spoken and agree with you:

    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/21/americas-oligarchy-not-democracy-or-republic-unive/

    …America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds

    …One finding in the study: The U.S. government now represents the rich and powerful, not the average citizen, United Press International reported…

    Besides, if we had a democracy, there would have been no Cold War, no Affirmative Action, no immigration…

    The last is a real weeper. In 1965 congressmen told the public they were only “changing the wording” because we aren’t taking in many immigrants at all anymore.

    Talk about a bamboozle.

  43. @Alrenous

    No, in the US everybody is paying with other people’s money, no matter Left, Right or center – you don’t have any money.

    You make other people pay for you.

    https://www.usdebtclock.org/

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  44. @Alrenous

    The Babylonian Captivity is easy to mark as judaisms intro to formalized depravity. Baal worship. Pre-dates them (and their specious claim of antiquity).

    No reason at all, then, that the philosopher isn’t speaking of the same.

    What’s a name, after all?
    Does shit not stink as foully?

    (“Name-stealer’s”’is a worthy topic.)

    .

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  45. Alrenous says: • Website
    @SteeringWheelHolder

    So Jews are so powerful they can make someone believe what they want them to believe from thousands of miles away, without social contact?

    Amazing.

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
  46. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Chris Moore

    So Hitler was so weak he couldn’t tell he was being baited? Unlike the fully-realized and self-aware Jew, Hitler was haplessly lead down the garden path, with no personal responsibility for his actions?

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  47. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Here Be Dragon

    So because nobody in America is right-wing, paying for things with your own money doesn’t make you right-wing?

    Is it really true that nobody in America makes anything of value? Does corn grown in America not feed a person who eats it? Does power generated in America not turn on a light when run through it?

    • Replies: @Here Be Dragon
  48. Alrenous says: • Website
    @DeclineoftheAmericanEmpire

    When two midgets fight, is your conclusion that the winning midget is strong and healthy?

  49. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Alrenous

    So Hitler was so weak he couldn’t tell he was being baited?

    Yes. Anyone who can’t or won’t see the Judeofascist for what it is, or who it has comprimised, is sick and weak. Hitler may have been high IQ, but he was sick and weak. And probably a sociopath, like Stalin and Churchill.

    Unlike the fully-realized and self-aware Jew

    Are ((Jews))/Judeofascists “fully realized”? Do they know who and what they are? Or do they think they’re Jews?

    Allowing them to think they’re Jews or brainwashing them into believing they’re Jews is how the Moneychanger and Zionist top dogs maintain their Praetorioan Guard.

    And yes, it is a Praetorioan Guard. Because it is guarding the “accountants” who leveraged their insider role as bookkeepers and bureaucrats for Empire into being the hidden hand puppetmasters pulling the strings on Empire. Why do you think Jesus declared these Roman Empire collaborating snakes the Synagogue of Satan? Where did they go after Rome destroyed Israel? Nowhere. They became servants of Empire.

    Only they’re not so hidden anymore. Becayse they wanted the world to know they were the brains behind the brawn. They wanted the power. They wanted the glory. And they wanted everyone to know who the big rabbi was, and to kiss his ring.

    Hubris. Chutzpah. Sociopathy. Pride goeth before the fall.

  50. @Alrenous

    they can make someone believe what they want them to believe from thousands of miles away, without social contact?

    You have heard of “electronic media” mayhap? Actually, books can do a pretty good job of non-social contact influencing too, as the C. Church found out.

    • Agree: Gordo
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  51. Corvinus says:

    ““Democracy” is a spook.”

    You are simply a disinformation agent, Mr. Anglin. Try to keep up here.

    Upon self-reflection on how we as humans conduct ourselves, especially if we are searching for a particular avenue to convince others that there is but one specific way of behaving, we delude ourselves into believing we have found the ultimate answer. But that response is run roughshod by our own confirmation biases. Stated another way, we must be wary of how fundamental attribution error affects our analysis of the human condition.

    Now, while it makes perfect sense to categorize humans in your schema, the way by which how the categorization is employed becomes nonsensical. What ends up inevitably occurring is you conveniently and neatly arranging your ideological proponents and opponents into these compartments. The end result? A self-fulfilling prophecy. While people may TEND to be rational or impulsive, one must carefully take into account the situation and context of that behavior, as well as their own prejudices. Again, you are being prone to situational and dispositional attributions, considering that rationality and impulsivity runs on a continuum.

    Indeed, when confronted with conflicting evidence that challenges one’s world view, there is self-denial and convoluted arguments. Be mindful that in a series of studies from 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. “The general idea is that it’s absolutely threatening to admit you’re wrong,” says political scientist Brendan Nyhan, the lead researcher on the Michigan study. The phenomenon — known as “backfire” — is “a natural defense mechanism to avoid that cognitive dissonance”.

    It is virtually impossible to argue with those people who cling on this “Fake News” or “media lies” meme. Any fact you bring as an argument, they immediately attack the SOURCE, rather than the substance. Thus, it is easy to deny there is ANY evidence at all. This phenomenon has been brewing for a long time, and it has reached a critical mass at our point in world history. Unfortunately, this leads more people to become ignorant by facilitating echo chambers and confirmation bias. An informed person looks CRITICALLY at the facts, considers any bias–including their own–, reads other sources on the issue, and then draws their own conclusions, realizing those conclusions will require verification from valid sources when challenged. Of course, it is vital to be honest when conducting an “internal audit” of one’s own thinking and logic.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @HeebHunter
    , @Alexandros
  52. “Democracy” is a propaganda spook, purely. A word used by America to send its sheeple into fits over great leaders like Saddam and Gaddafi and Putin.

    Look at the frenzy over Ukraine and the silence about Yemen, which has been treated vastly worse but by America’s friend.

    Sorry, gotta stop there, gotta vomit.

    • Agree: Miro23, KDE1711
  53. IronForge says:

    3 Levels of the Masonic-Zionist Murican Hegemony:

    Plutarchy
    Oligarchy
    Ochlarchy

  54. Malcolin says: • Website

    The word “Democracy” is presently used by cheap politicians simply as a shameless brainwashing to entertain the stupid ignorants.

    • Agree: Biff
  55. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,

    Now that’s a democracy where Ezra Pound’s definition doesn’t apply.

  56. bert33 says:

    “Wenn zwei sich streiten, dann freut sich der Dritte”, when two men are fighting, the third one is happy. The challenge for the journalism community is to uncover who profits by turning americans against each other. The phenomenon is also called, ‘divide and conquer’, and it may develop that some members of the journalism community do not have americans’ best interests at heart, and delight at cranking the calliope and running up the public’s stress levels with broad spectrum ‘journalism’. And that’s all I have to say about that.

  57. Anon[146] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Bland pasta.

    • Replies: @Patrick in SC
  58. Lurker says:
    @Ghan-buri-Ghan

    Your average Amerimutt literally believes that by watching both CNN and Fox Jews, they get all sides of the story.

    The same mindset applies over here too (UK). Seemingly intelligent white people claiming to me they have a balanced view by watching Channel X and Channel Y. Or newspaper A and newspaper B.

    Hopeless.

  59. @Dutch Boy

    Perhaps distributism is close to a happy medium?

    • Replies: @Dutch Boy
  60. Miro23 says:
    @saggy

    Democracy, i.e. letting the hoi polloi decide important issues of state, is preposterous on its face. So, I agree with Anglin, let’s stop talking about democracy.

    Agreed that it’s a basic misunderstanding about democracy.

    There’s nothing wrong with people discussing important group issues and having a binding vote on them. But they have to be IMPARTIALLY INFORMED (impartially given the pro and con information), have TIME to study it all, MONETARY COMPENSATION while they take time off to study it, be shielded from SPECIAL INTEREST PRESSURE and be OBLIGED TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS (fines for non-participation).

    This is more or less how Swiss issue by issue democracy works. It’s the longest running democratic system in the world and it’s expensive, slow and really hard work.

    Defined this way, then the US is not remotely a democracy. Anglin is right.

    • Replies: @saggy
  61. @War for Blair Mountain

    Democracy=LEGAL IMMIGRANTS from India

    You should also have added that in lockstep with fellow Jewish apartheid fascist “democracy”, India boasts of its own fascist brand going by the name Hindutva, one that openly calls for the genocide of some 200 million Muslims. Besides reproducing like rabbits, consider their hijacking of Mauritius, an island off the East African coast, Guyana in South America and almost succeeded in grabbing Fiji after achieving parliamentary majority. Only a coup by that country’s native military averted a certain Indian takeover. America now boasts of two powerful groups: Hindus and Jews both of whose loyalties are first and foremost towards their countries, one of which is being stolen from the Palestinians. Idi Amin saw the writing on the wall by Indians who were labeled Asian Jews, because of their economic power – and sent Uganda’s Indians packing.

  62. KDE1711 says:
    @Alrenous

    I think classical fascists can be thought of as right-wing progressives. Through their hostility towards throne and altar and glorification of the all-powerful modern state, they were distinctly revolutionary. Yet, in their valorization of social hierarchy and traditional sexual roles, they firmly rejected egalitarianism and libertinism.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  63. Do we have to live in a dictatorship where the gestapo or commissar knock on your door after midnight, take you away blind folded to make you disappear forever, in order to appreciate democracy? If people become immoral, indifferent, decadent, violent in a democracy by misusing and abusing their God-given freedoms, then how could that be the fault of democracy? Of course, being a human institution, democracy is not perfect and there are many nefarious agents who never play by the rules or who think they are above the law. Despite them, practically democracy seems to be the least bad system around. To blame the immoral choice and behavior of people on democracy is not fair. Maybe, the best one could say is that such people don’t deserve democracy since they have lost the true knowledge about the source of their freedoms and even that of their very existence, and purpose of existence.
    If we defend democracy, it’s with that one hope and condition. Otherwise, it’s much much better to live under a benevolent wise autocrat or king than in a demoncratic Sodom and Gomorrah. God forbid! The alliance between marxists and sodomites, if it’s more than tactical, means ending up with the worst of both worlds. Lord have mercy!!!

    “… Attack on the Family: The sanctity of the God-given institution of marriage is undermined in various ways. By feminism, insisting women can’t be fulfilled as wife and mother, but must rather leave the home and family to be fulfilled; men encouraged to be playboys instead of responsible husbands and fathers; divorce; same-sex “marriage” and gender ideology; parents undermined as the primary educators of their children, now to be replaced by public schools and a state-defined “Common Core Curriculum”; the introduction of pornography in the home via internet and cable TV, etc., etc., etc.
    All of this destruction of persons and values – leaving in its wake a veritable “culture of death” – had been foretold by Our Lady of Fatima, as the consequence that would follow, if her message and requests were not heeded. Many billions of deaths COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED — IF HER MESSAGE AND REQUESTS HAD BEEN HEEDED…
    https://livingfatima.com/2017/03/21/do-you-know-the-fatima-message/

    • Replies: @anno nimus
  64. @Chris Moore

    I am sorry but I think that believing one is better, superior, to other humans by dint of one’s mother’s ancestry, that you possess a different and superior soul to others, and that God chose you from all the people of the Earth for a transcendent destiny (plus MUCH more)makes you mad, in my opinion. No wonder that the best of the Jews gave up this crap, or only pretend to believe it.

  65. @TG

    IM-BECILE. Russia is ruled by many people, and Putin is President. God I hate the brainwashed ignoramuses.

    • Replies: @Sisifo
  66. geokat62 says:
    @James J. O'Meara

    the only people allowed to vote were those who knew the difference btw “the hoi polloi” and “hoi polloi.”

    I was expecting you to write…

    the only people allowed to vote were those who knew the difference btw the “hoi polloi” (the many) and the “hoi oligoi” (the few).

  67. @DeclineoftheAmericanEmpire

    The USA got rich through murdering the Indigenous, mining the richest agricultural soil, clear-felling massive forests, damming the rivers, stealing land from Mexico, ruthlessly exploiting Latin America, then the world, exploiting millions of slaves, indentured labourers and poor immigrants, surviving two World Wars intact, and creating a global economic system at Bretton Woods based on neo-imperialist looting. If that is ‘democracy’ then you may shove it.

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @apollonian
    , @Craig Nelsen
  68. @anno nimus

    ‘Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…’

    Winston S Churchill, 11 November 1947

    • Replies: @Biff
  69. Anon[399] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Moore

    Fascists are right-wing leftists.

    • Agree: Levtraro
  70. geokat62 says:
    @Jeff Davis

    Here is one root of the problem.

    Politicians must conduct “campaigns” to persuade the voters to vote for them. Monied interests provide the money for those campaigns.

    Here’s a link to an interview of former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, Forced To Sign Loyalty To Israel – Cynthia McKinney (2014)

    According to the former congresswoman, it appears the format evolved from one in which congresspeople had to sign a pre-formatted pledge to having to write a paragraph in their own words.

    … or read the transcription of the interview:

    [MORE]

    Cynthia McKinney (CM) – … not allowed to do that because I did not toe the line on US policy for Israel.
    Host – What line is that that they wanted? Were you told, directly, that you had to toe a line or… explain that for me.
    CM – Well, every candidate for Congress, at that time, had a pledge, they were given a pledge to sign, and I was new on the scene. So, the pledge had Jerusalem as the capital city, the military superiority of Israel.
    Host – American congresspeople have to sign this pledge?
    CM – Yes, you sign the pledge. If you don’t sign the pledge, you don’t get money. So, for example, it was almost like water torture for me. My parents observed this. I would get a call and the person on the other end of the phone would say “I want to do a fundraiser for you.” And then we would get into the planning. I would get really excited because, of course, you have to have money in order to run a campaign. And then two weeks, three weeks, into the planning, they would say “did you sign the pledge?” And then I would say “No, I didn’t sign the pledge.” And then my fundraiser would go kaput!
    Host – So, I just wanted to get into this pledge a little bit more. So, this is basically something that is mandatory, that every congressperson has to sign saying that… what “Jerusalem,” you said, “is the capital of Israel” and what else?
    CM – You make a commitment that you will vote to support the military superiority of Israel. That the economic assistance that Israel wants, that you would vote to provide that.
    Host – This isn’t a question for the Congresspeople that they are representing or they’re supposed to be representing the people of the United States, not a foreign country? And yet they have to pledge allegiance to a foreign state? No one questions this?
    CM – Yes, that’s what I was asked to do. And, I made it public… probably nobody had said anything about it. But, I made it public and then the excuse was “well, those were just over zealous advocates for Israel.” So, then the tactic changed… but this is what is done for 535 members of the United States Congress: 100 senators, 435 members of the House of Representatives have to now write a paragraph, which basically says the same thing. So, it’s not a pledge, but it’s a paragraph and you post it… and, you know, there are these forums you have to go to at the synagogues or whatever… and, you know, if you don’t perform appropriately then you don’t get money to run your campaign. The problem is that it requires an awful lot of money to run a campaign. And, whether it’s a woman’s organization, an environmental organization… people can read about this on the Internet, if they’re interested. If you go to Thomas dot LOC dot gov, that is the official United States Congress website. And if you put in the name Gus Savage, because Gus Savage was a black member of Congress who was targeted by the pro-Israel lobby. And he had the foresight to use his position as an incumbent in the House of Representatives to put his experience on the Congressional record. For the entire existence of the United States Congress, now, people will be able to access his experience. And what he wrote was that it was the Garden Club of New Jersey that gave his opponent \$5,000. But it wasn’t really the Garden Club of New Jersey, it was the activists who were associated with AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
    Host – Wow, unbelievable… but, we’re almost out of time.

    • Thanks: Notsofast, WhoaWaitaMinute
    • Replies: @Fred777
    , @HammerJack
  71. @Corvinus

    This poolacke, vax pushing, holohoax pushing piece of shit poolacke leech in the us just can’t stop!

    Tic toc, poolacke. Soon, there will be no more (((democracy))). Pooland will end up just like the Ukraine, in it’s rightful place in history.

    Yes, the “end of history” is returning to pooland and eastern Europe.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  72. Talking about democracy without social equality is a farce, that’s why it costs blood to impose it.

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  73. Karl1906 says:

    First of all, kudos to Anglin for consequently applying Max Stirner’s philosophy! Very much appreciated. (But you should not stop there and also give Hegel and Nietzsche a spin.)

    In regards to the US… it’s not democracy per se which is at the end of its line it’s the American brand of republicanism that’s now corrupted to the core and perverted into the ground. And, like previous empires before, the US have to END their “world police show” – which has been nothing more than gunboat diplomacy since ww2 – and FIX their domestic issues.

    Let’s be honest the two party-system has been a total disaster for the country ever since the Monroe Doctrine was pushed through congress (in 1823) and Donald J. Trump should have NEVER been able to become president at all. The latter statement may raise some eyebrows here but just imagine some 100 years earlier William Randolph Hearst becoming president in a similar vain.

    Back then it didn’t happen because Hearst was clearly “too much” of a capitalist and reckless power player for the highest office. And the majority of voters simply considered him to be morally “unfit” for the highest office. (His contemporary John D. Rockefeller never even dared to come up with the idea in public.) Whereas Trump became president because… nobody took him seriously as a candidate and Hillary Clinton’s victory was considered a “done deal” by the establishment?!?

    Sorry, but a system with such issues must be fixed! Not necessarily by civil war or splitting the country up along political lines. But the insane consequences OF THIS ISSUE are heavily reflected in foreign policy too.

    And you wouldn’t let a man drive his truck who’s clearly inebriated AND also heavily arguing with his wife on the smartphone at the same time. And American foreign policy also has one arm tied behind its back due to third party interests taking precedence – AND a blindfold on both eyes due to lobby manipulation and media gas lighting.

    No, sorry, but the Americans definitely have to leave the stage at this point. Come back when you’re sober and united again as a people and your worst criminals are all locked up in jail and not in charge of the whole country.

  74. Richard B says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    In this article AA gives an excellent demonstration of how a writer violates his own logic. Of course, he thought he was doing something else. In an article where he says that his side just wants to be left alone he’s telling us to stop using a word he doesn’t like.

    In the first place, we should no more listen to anyone who believes in God to tell us to stop using the word Democracy than we should listen to someone who claims to believe in Democracy telling us to stop using the word God.

    An individual or group might decide that a word (like Democracy or God) is meaningless (to them). But that doesn’t mean other people can’t and don’t use that word to control their behavior.

    For example, though I don’t particularly care for the word Truth, if someone wants to use it, fine. But I wouldn’t say it’s meaningless. Truth is a word of high status, that’s why people who claim to believe in God and Democracy also claim that their interpretation of those words are “The Truth.” But, though Truth is a word of high status, it only applies to propositions, not to the world, or even to human behavior. It might be useful to search for the truth in the verbal world, but in the real world we want and need to produce a result. That’s what verbal behavior is for, to get us to produce a result. If not, we’re trapped in language and just talking. Speaking of being trapped in language:

    the Max Stirner spooks meme is useful in basic discourse.

    https://the-philosophers-shirt.com/blogs/philosophical-dictionary/max-stirner-on-spooks-truth-and-sanity

    You click the link and get this:

    Max Stirner argues that most commonly accepted social institutions – including the notion of the state, property as a right, natural rights in general, and the notion of society itself – are mere illusions, “spooks,” or ghosts (depending on the translation) in one’s mind. Just about any idea can be turned into a “spook,” an idea that haunts or possesses one and supposedly motivates one’s actions above all else.

    Hauntology is a set of ideas that refer to the return or persistence of elements from the social or cultural past, as in the manner of a ghost. The term is a neologism first used by French philosopher Jacques Derrida in his 1993 book “Specters of Marx.”

    God, property, man, reason, community, money, the people, love, the worker, the race, the state, morality, etc., can all act as ghosts when they are absolutely placed – sanctified – above everything else. When they are sanctified and serve as justification (but more often excuse) for one’s actions, they haunt man.

    So he uses a metaphysical pseudo-entity (Hauntology) to explain a group of metaphysical pseudo-entities. In short, he’s trapped in language.

    Good luck finding any solid empirical evidence to support this set of ideas or uniformly conclusive results from a group of experimental psychologists, or anyone else, after they’ve attempted to test them.

    Worse, all of the above-mentioned pseudo-entities or hyposticizations are said to be illusions in one’s mind.

    But what is the mind if not a pseudo-entity? After all, if we ask someone to find Andrew Anglin it shouldn’t be too hard. But if you ask someone to find Andrew Anglin’s mind they can not in the same way find it.

    The fact is, most people use most words vaguely and indefinitely and with the assumption that there’s something in the mind that corresponds to the word, or something in the word that corresponds to the world. One could ask, How does a word get to the world? Or
    How does the world get to a word?
    But since both word and world are words the question becomes How does a word get to a word? And the obvious answer is that a word doesn’t do anything.

    That’s why the only really useful comprehension of meaning is a behavioral comprehension, What is meaning’s place in the rest of human behavior. Because that’s one thing no one can avoid. Behavior. In this case, verbal behavior, which is species-specific, the one thing that separates us from every other species.

    And one obvious proposition we can draw from a consideration of meaning’s place in human behavior is that the meaning of a word or proposition is the response to it. A fact easily confirmed by all manner of social interaction, every day, all over the world, professional or personal.

    Even people on the same side have a hard time agreeing with each other long enough to get things done or to keep what they have. And that includes one’s relationship with themselves. People, Places, and Things (including words) mean different things to us at different times.

    The fact is, most words are rarely given any serious examination. So there’s no need to stop using the word Democracy, or God, or Truth, etc. The point is to use the words we live by more intelligently by allowing those words to eventually tumble out of the ultimately circular world of language and into behavior.

    Once that’s done it becomes immediately obvious that the meaning of a word is the response to it. So then, how do you channel the responses of millions of people (even billions) over extended periods of time long enough to form what all, or most, would agree is a culture? Obviously, though that question can be answered, this isn’t the place to do it.

    One thing’s for sure, it’s going to be very difficult to do it living in an age, as we are, of complete and total Explanatory Collapse. That might be a depressing fact and a distressing state of affairs, but to more courageous spirits that collapse represents, not just an opportunity, but our only hope. It very well may be.

    • Replies: @Anon
  75. The greatest American writer, in my opinion said this about democracy – “If voting mattered, they wouldn’t let us do it.” I agree with that, 100%.

  76. @Pure Coincidence

    Tucker is great
    —————–
    Get rid of the idiotbox.

  77. G. Poulin says:

    Democracy is a way of making the serfs feel like they have some say in how the manor is run.

    • Agree: GomezAdddams
  78. Kim says:
    @Glinka33

    Your view sounds like a leg pull from the 1970s.

    • Replies: @Glinka33
  79. Johan says:

    It is in the nature of a democracy, the rule of the people, that there is also popular rule in the domain of definitions. Since democracy is characterized by a lack of unity, a destruction of tradition, standards and intelligent authority, also the definition of democracy is subject to erosion and redefinition from below. Finally voting is needed, to bind the mess of a multitude of ruling kings (democratic man) into some coherent whole, just like voting is required to combine the mess of the many into a coherent whole, to create something fit for serious policy. This is why politicians justifiably ignore the wishes of voters.

    The people’s rule potentially creates as much spooks as there are people, if they have the chance, if they have enough time.

    What is the best argument against democracy?
    Statistically probable, you yourself are the best argument.

    To be serious, democracy can best be defined in witty and satirical terms, like Oscar Wilde’s paraphrase on Lincoln:

    Democracy is the bludgeoning of the people, by the people, for the people.

    Other definitions:

    The people’s farce.

    The revolt of the people until the Utopia of ultimate Debility and Depravity.

    The rule of spooks.

    The spook of all spooks?

    The rule of King Mediocrity?

    The rule of King Vulgarian.

    Bottom line: no intelligent man will entertain a serious definition of democracy without making fun of it. Only politicians and the people take its serious. Though politicians on the longer run will likely be subject to what could be called the Churchillean realization:

    The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter

    One does not need to stop talking about democracy, humor and wit should be applied, to counter the people’s tendency:

    Democracy is the spook of the people, taking themselves too serious.

  80. Andreas says:

    At the national level, the US government is already post-democratic and neo-authoritarian.

  81. Biff says:
    @anno nimus

    Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…’

    Winston S Churchill, 11 November 1947

    Churchill was an evil corrupt drunken grifter that made Hitler look like a polite Boy Scout.

    • Replies: @Johan
    , @Johan
  82. Corvinus says:
    @HeebHunter

    LOL, all talk on your part and no action. My truth cuts you to the bone, and you flail like a little girl in response.

  83. apollonian says: • Website

    Anglin Gives Us All Useful Demonstration, Analysis Of “Democratic” Psycho-Babble, Suckers

    Andrew Anglin presents a legitimate challenge for philosophers and “intellectuals,” but Christ and Christian philosophy have already figured it out–it’s the same old TRUTH (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) vs. satanic lies and lying (JOHN 8:44).

    Thus those who assume and believe in TRUTH (= Christ) necessarily presume the objective (Aristotelian) reality (as it cannot be proven in logic, merely assumed as necessary metaphysical axiom), following the Greeks who preceded and laid basic foundation for glorious Christianity and all Western Civilization, science, etc., objective reality being necessary basis of any possible, conceivable, meaningful “truth.”

    Satanists, on the other hand, hold reality is subjective, along w. Immanuel Kant, who say consciousness/mentality creates reality–and indeed, we observe that this COLLECTIVISTIC subjectivism is what rules and dominates, the powerful, united, and highly organized collectivists making use of such as the US Federal Reserve Bank (also IMF, BIS, etc.) which is literally just legalized counterfeiting (see Mises.org for expo; use their site search-engine for particular terms, like “fiat-currency”), putting out the fake “currency,” not real MONEY, and then using these grossly inflated funds to build the vast imperial dictatorship as we see now in form of world government, enforced by UN and NATO. Q.E.D.

    Thus this huge satanic counterfeiting fraud, called “central-banking,” now creates and funds all the other devilish instruments of “Big Brother,” the tech monopolies, the “Big Pharma” corp.s which mass-exterminate the “excess” population, the Jews-media, etc., and we have what we see today, the great “globalist” beast, ruthlessly trampling all humanity and civilization before it. The Biblic “Book of Revelations” is thus confirmed for all the basic details, though it doesn’t necessarily mean the total, absolute end of all existence–just another down-turn and “decline” stage in the process of Spenglerian CYCLIC history–we’re in for a severe bear-market now, fools.

    But Anglin surely makes a lot of sense for demonstrating the various ways the Satanists, subjectivists, and liars, so skilled now in their “deconstructionist,” “post-structuralist” “interpretations,” etc. can spin-off elaborate balderdash and “theorizing” that now “intellectuals” can waste time babbling over, eh? The rest of the population is sooooo impressed.

    Truly, the world is over-populated, but by who?–it’s over-populated w. Satanists, “globalists,” and their flunkies, like “liberals” and leftists with their “noble” lies, “good intentions,” and constant dissembling–all built upon subjectivism (like “good-evil,” a perfectly “free” will, and other heresies) and regardless it’s sophisticated organization–all of it doomed to the usual destruction of lies and lying, suckers–like all the fiat-currency schemes throughout history.

  84. apollonian says: • Website
    @mulga mumblebrain

    U’re just full of the usual, typical “woke” lies and babble–which u can shove, sucker.

  85. MLK says:

    If you’re at all paying attention you’ve noticed that Democrats rarely refer to democracy. From Obama on down their phrasing is almost always “our democracy.”

    The US is a constitutional republic.

    Rather obviously, if the powers that be were genuinely interested in public sentiment they would poll on support for free and fair elections. Not on our democracy. What little they’ve done on specifics — voter ID, mass mail-in ballots, non-citizens voting, are all 80/20 for that which as a matter of common sense undergirds free and fair elections.

    Indeed, while the cruel lie has it that we are a “50-50 divided country,” on anything approaching a National Question we’re Pareto Principle 80/20.

    The ruling and governing classes, as refracted through the Democrats and their RINO filth controlled opposition, are frightened of losing their grip so they want the rest of us at each other’s throats.

    Don’t conflate civil war with going kinetic. That’s what’s already begun and will heat up in furtherance of pretexts sufficient for them to continue to make progress on Patriot Act 2.0, or whatever they’re calling their Police State thingie these days.

    This great republic isn’t going to perish because there are a lot of 40-50 year old ladies who have a bee in their bonnets over was and soon to be again POTUS Trump. Antifa/BLM, the Democrats Brown Shirts, did as much damage as they did in 2020, because “Trump Must Go!” — basically anyone who is anybody, foreign and domestic — let them run the streets. Not only are they not the Hard men of which authoritarian resolves are made, the biological males among them think they’re ladies.

    The establishment is feeding us the civil war narrative to keep Democrats that haven’t already moved to MAGA on team, angry, and still prepared to vote Democrat.

  86. The fatal flaw of “libertarian” democracy is the absence of sufficient state controls capable of foiling the wealthy class’s incessant attempts to manipulate the economy, the media and elected representatives for its own gain. Absent such safeguards, inevitably a widening gulf develops between poverty and affluence, and quiescent (or misdirected) working people are gradually dragged down to ruin. Jefferson (and Mao) quixotically hoped a revolution in every generation would remedy this tendency.

    The country is a republic, not a democracy. The Founders were Anglo-American aristocrats from a rigidly class-structured world, who deeply distrusted the ordinary people who fought for independence from English oversight on their behalf. In Federalist No. 10, Madison condemned democracies as “spectacles of turbulence … incompatible with … the rights of property [owners].” Democracies were vulnerable, Madison claimed, to “factious leaders” who could “kindle a flame” among the dangerous masses for “wicked projects” like “abolition of debts” and “an equal division of property.” To Madison and his ilk, their enemies were Americans of the lesser classes who (not unlike their slaves), “labour under all the hardships of life, and secretly sigh for a more equal distribution of its blessings.”

    In the first national election under the new government in 1788-89 only 43,782 men were able to cast votes – out of an American population of nearly four million. It’s hard to picture Madison not being pleased with today’s total surveillance, censorship, and propagandizing of “the rabble” whose potential strength he was so determined to undermine.

    Remember also that the constitutional convention met with the publicly stated purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation, which draft would then be submitted to all the state legislatures for discussion. Instead, in a virtual coup d’etat, the attendees abolished the existing loose league of “free and independent states” to create a strong central government with all real power in their hands. Their deliberations were conducted in extreme secrecy and were presented as a fait accompli when they were done. The plan was then submitted to state ratifying conventions of hand-picked delegates, rather than submitted as originally stated to the elected representatives of the people, with a two-thirds majority of these conventions, rather than unanimous approval by all the states, needed to begin the new government. Conventional histories tell of the opposition of powerful men but almost invariably omit the protests of Continental Army veterans who rallied to publicly burn the document, which they condemned as a betrayal of what they had sacrificed so much to achieve. The regime is still working just as intended, strong enough to promote the elite’s interests but too weak to ever require them to surrender any entitlement when the promised “common welfare” might require it.

    • Replies: @Johan
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  87. Dystopian says:
    @DeclineoftheAmericanEmpire

    Democracy is when two wolves and a lamb vote on lunch. We were a constitutional republic with democratically elected officials. Government was held in check by the rule of law and only men with skin in the game selected our leaders. I’m not sure when the oligarchy took over but is was most likely just after the civil war. Since then government has done pretty much whatever they wanted without regard to the powers granted by the Constitution. The oligarchy used to hide in the shadows and pretend that the people ran things but now they don’t care that we know. It is the end game.

    • Agree: Realist, Robert Bruce
  88. Democracy in the US is Jew/Zionist money and myths telling the media what to say and think so the media can pass it on to the masses. One of the politicians most sacred articles of faith is that Israel must be supported because Israel is a – you guessed it – democracy. We have all heard our darling Hillary say so.

  89. Fr. John says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    A woman is NOT sovereign of her own body, as it is the property of the Man, acting as Vice-Regent of God. Even St. Paul made that clear, ‘You are not your own….”.

    For Adam was created first, then Eve as a helpmeet.

    So, as women are roughly equated with children, and both are under male headship, the two things ARE related. Children cannot be trusted with independent thought, and women should only be trusted with same, through/under the Headship of Husband, Father, Brother.

    Yeah, I know no one wants to hear this, but one has to start somewhere to restore Christendom/Patriarchy.

    • Agree: KDE1711
    • LOL: Realist
  90. saggy says: • Website
    @Miro23

    Agreed that it’s a basic misunderstanding about democracy.

    ? I think it is the definition of democracy.

    There’s nothing wrong with people discussing important group issues and having a binding vote on them. But they have to be IMPARTIALLY INFORMED (impartially given the pro and con information), have TIME to study it all, MONETARY COMPENSATION while they take time off to study it, be shielded from SPECIAL INTEREST PRESSURE and be OBLIGED TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS (fines for non-participation).

    This sounds like nonsense. Every sentence sounds like nonsense. ‘The people’ are for the most part uninterested, uneducated, incapable of critical thought, thoroughly propagandized, and effectively stupid. No amount of time or money will change that. Orwell wrote ‘The proles and animals are free’, meaning the proles (85% of the population by his estimate) didn’t care about anything beyond creature comforts and entertainment, and therefore didn’t require propaganda, like animals).

    Not to mention, in a mixed race society like the US, ‘the people’ have conflicting interests. I lived in LA for 3 years (working at Hughes and Lockheed) and my assessment of the place was that it was a ‘war zone’.

    This is more or less how Swiss issue by issue democracy works. It’s the longest running democratic system in the world and it’s expensive, slow and really hard work.

    I’d have to see it to believe it. Got a link?

    • Replies: @Miro23
  91. Cowboy says:

    The fatal flaw of “libertarian” democracy is the absence of sufficient state controls…blah blah blah

    Lets unpack the logic. We need to give the people in power more power to stop the people in power.

    Retarded.

  92. @Fr. John

    If you really think we have to go this route, one has to start by fixing men. However as it stands now most participants in pride parades are men. Some perfume and makeup ads are targeting men now. How about all that male poufy hair and their facial hair artistry? If I watch another HGTV show where men have to have shoe closets along with a dressing room, I will scream. Quite frankly I rarely watch the shows anymore due to the intolerable effeminate men. Bring back the alpha ones, and women just might happily follow.

    • Agree: Automatic Slim
  93. Redefining the definition of words, or the perversion if you prefer, has been a genius move by the left. We on the right have never been able to combat it. As for the political parties, there really is just one. Any rebel who manages to break thru will be marginalized or corrupted.

  94. Towey says:

    Modern Democracy was simply a means by which the moneychangers ensured that citizens could not disown the debts contracted in their name by a so-called representative government with private bankers who conjured money out of thin air under the fractional reserve system.
    When usury was illegal, the refusal to recognise and pay debts was a big problem for the moneychangers. Modern Democracy solved that.
    I read that Cromwell refused to pay the debts to the moneylenders in the Netherlands who had financed his invasion of England.
    The fact that he had opened the country for unlimited Jewish immigration was not sufficient for them.
    Apparently, two of the original clauses of the Magna Carta (now supressed) restricted the amounts that the usurers could claw back from the widow and children on the death of a debtor.
    I am sure there are more knowledgeable commentators on the site that could amplify this comment.

    • Replies: @KDE1711
  95. Fred777 says:
    @geokat62

    “Wow, unbelievable… but, we’re almost out of time.“

    Ain’t that the truth.

  96. Anon[221] • Disclaimer says:

    The article is a load of rotting gobble dee gook shit !

    • Replies: @Robert Bruce
  97. Alrenous says: • Website
    @James J. O'Meara

    We’re talking about Protagoras, in the fifth century BC.

  98. Emslander says:

    Even the most primitive African tribes have spooks, which is how the Catholic Church ultimately decided that they were human beings with souls and not animals (it was a hot topic of debate).

    When starving for thought, just take a cheap bullshit shot at the Catholic Church.

  99. Alrenous says: • Website
    @KDE1711

    They didn’t firmly reject egalitarianism. Voting makes no sense if you’re not an egalitarian. Socialism even less.

  100. @Anon

    As soon as you see the word “disinformation” used without irony, you can stop reading.

  101. Anon[221] • Disclaimer says:
    @Richard B

    Democracy is when someone like you writes a comment that is more like an article full of hogwash to discuss another article that is full of hogwash.

    Democracy is when we have little or no time to dissect the verbal masturbation of either you or the author and opt instead to use our time to be more productive by taking a dump.

    Get a life man !

    • Troll: Richard B
    • Replies: @Richard B
  102. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Chris Moore

    Yes.

    Well, fair enough.

    Why do you think Jesus declared these Roman Empire collaborating snakes the Synagogue of Satan?

    Because he didn’t like the competition.

    The decay halted around 500-600 AD, after the fall of Empire. Perhaps even reverted slightly.

    Why do you think the decay restarted (e.g. new peasant uprisings) after ~1100?

    • Replies: @Swaytonious
  103. Miro23 says:
    @saggy

    This is more or less how Swiss issue by issue democracy works. It’s the longest running democratic system in the world and it’s expensive, slow and really hard work.

    I’d have to see it to believe it. Got a link?

    UK local politician and academic Kendrick Jones wrote and excellent little book comparing UK and Swiss Democracy. Some things are not moving in a good direction but it’s basically all there.

    For example, in the Canton of Geneva he talks to Monsieur Kyburz, Lord Mayor of the 46 Communes of Geneva and Mayor of the Commune of Carouge, who states that the driving force behind all Swiss democracy is the principle of subsidiarity i.e. devolving power down to the smallest viable unit that can support it. “So in Geneva,” said the Lord Mayor, “each Commune has as much power as it can usefully exploit.”. He also notes that participatory democracy can be frustrating and costly but that citizen involvement makes it more than worthwhile.

    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse
  104. “More than half of self-identified Democrats and Republicans believe the US will no longer be a “democracy” at some point in the future, according to a new poll.”

    The New York Post poll is gaslighting of Americans, if there ever was one!

  105. Joe Biden is not metaphorically a shitstain….Joe Biden is literally a shitstain in an adult diaper….I mean Holy Canoly…..

    And this shitstain is the metaphysical ontology of the Democratic Party…..Theologically the worship of shit…..Morally speaking, the worship of shit….

    Speaking of shit…Will Stacey Abrams be our Idi Amin?

  106. @Corvinus

    The world does not run on argument, it runs on force. Every winning argument is backed by force.

    Attacking the source is not a bug in the human condition, it’s a feature. It is our defense against enemies trying to trick us. If you can’t trust the information to be true or unbiased, and obviously it won’t be when emanating from a political opponent, you are right in rejecting it. Your belief being reinforced is a form of battle readiness. “Oh they almost got me, better clam up next time!”.

    There is no objectivity or true rationality in this world. Nobody possess these things in pure form so it would be folly to try and base any world order on it. The human condition is fundamentally irrational and chaotic. Part of what makes it dynamic and worth living.

    Adolf Hitler understood these things perfectly. You may not be right but you still have to make decisions. Attacking those decisions on the premise they might be wrong is counterproductive and ultimately futile. All you can hope for is that your idea prevails. To prevail you need the backing of irrational human beings, and this is where the intellectual argument has to concede defeat. What does being well informed mean when some hooligan is bashing your brains in?

    Argument only has value when complimenting force.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
    , @Corvinus
  107. @mulga mumblebrain

    The USA got rich through murdering the Indigenous,

    Everyone in the world (including the Natives) lives on land “stolen” from someone else. Everyone’s ancestors “murdered” someone else. But not everyone in the world got rich. Some, like the Chinese, were poor then rich then poor then rich then…

    It seems like with every post you succeed only in demonstrating your ignorance of the way the world works.

  108. @Alrenous

    Does corn grown in America not feed a person who eats it? Does power generated in America not turn on a light when run through it?

    Yes it does but it isn’t enough.

    Have you guys been spending as much as you can really afford you would be living in a third world country conditions – no more big houses with a pool, no more big cars, two-bedroom apartments in a multi-storey building and a small car instead, like most people in the world have.

    You are living in that bubble world of yours and are so proud of that, but it isn’t real.

    • LOL: Alrenous
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  109. @Liborio Guaso

    Talking about democracy without social equality is a farce, that’s why it costs blood to impose it.

    Talking about social equality is dystopian, and the blood it costs to impose it is a tragedy.

    De Tocqueville: In a condition of equality, men will grow to love that equality more than liberty itself, and the more equal they become, the more insatiable their desire for it.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  110. Realist says:

    I am against all forms of democracy, as it is always an oligarchy, which always reduces personal freedom. Even in its pure form, the masses will vote away other people’s right and vote away their own rights because the masses are stupid cattle.

    This is a demonstrable fact…and is the reason we find ourselves where we are today.

    • Agree: Towey
  111. anonymous[137] • Disclaimer says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Dot-dindoos suffer from deep seated inferiority complexes (especially skin colour, accent, etc.). They are shit scared of an AmeriKKKa which will treat them like “niggers,” because they kind of resemble them superficially.

    So, they go around with masks of liberalism and wokeism, and vote Democrat overwhelmingly. These rabid pagan mofers are also some of the most racist and casteist scum on earth. They show their true colours in their shithole of a homeland, by supporting the most rabid dot-dindoo nationalist parties.

    If you whitevil scum of the earth don’t trim the wings of these dotniggers, these lickspittle of the kikes will together fuck your societies. That is good too.

  112. Dutch Boy says:
    @RadicalCenter

    It is the only system compatible with actual democracy.

  113. Realist says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    It is arguable that the woman is sovereign of her own body, the state, therefore, not.

    But a woman who voluntarily enters into sexual intercourse with a man is no longer a singular sovereign of the resultant fetus’s body.

    How about the rights of the father?

    • Thanks: Mario Partisan
  114. anonymous[137] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fr. John

    What you pagan vermin need is the true monotheism of Islam.

    What you advocate comes automatically with it. A true Muslim woman understands and accepts it wholeheartedly.

    Of course, there is also the eternal bliss of Paradise to look forward to. God willing.

    But then, you supremacist whitevil scum would need to renounce your racial pride for accepting that. Not happening.

    • Replies: @KDE1711
    , @RoatanBill
  115. Agent76 says:

    Jun 2, 2022 Chicago Had 971 Shootings In First 5 Months Of The Year. Violence Is Trending Down From Pandemic Peak, But ‘Is Still Way Too High,’ Expert Says

    There were fewer shootings last month compared to previous Mays, but “if we continue to tolerate the level of gun violence that we tolerate, we are going to continue to see residents leave the city,” a violence expert said.

    https://blockclubchicago.org/2022/06/02/chicago-had-971-shootings-in-first-half-of-the-year-violence-is-trending-down-from-pandemic-peak-but-is-still-way-too-high-expert-says/

    23 States Pass NRA Constitutional Carry

    • Replies: @Jack Kennedy
  116. Realist says:
    @JR Foley

    In Taiwan—Chiang Kai Shek ran a Democracy. Voters flocked to polling station–got their ballot —went to cubicle–opened ballot and there was ONE Name –and it was NOT “Batman” !!!!

    Democracy implies an actual choice. Therefore Taiwan did not have a democracy…just as the U.S. does not.

  117. We have a good framework. America just needs a few tweaks to undo the damage done by inaction:

    [MORE]

    Our Shit Hole Congress:

    * Congressional Term Limits
    * Ban all Insider Trading from Members of Congress.
    * End the SuperPacs
    * Force AIPAC to declare itself a Zionist Organization working on the behalf of Israel.
    * Force all of Congress to tour Palestine (Not Israel) and speak to Palestinian children and their mothers. Film it and make it required watching of every American citizen. Say for a 10% reduction in taxes – you have to be educated on the plight of the Palestinian people. Their genocide has been hidden for 50 years now.
    * Immediately ban all US Tax dollars going to Israel.
    * Limit the number of Jews in politics. An ethnic group that makes up only 2% of our population should not equate to a staggering 50% of Joe Biden’s cabinet.

    The Education and Development of our Youth:

    * Update Core Education requirements championing America.
    * Ban Critical Race Theories in all schools.
    * Re-Institute the Pledge of Allegiance in every classroom. Citizenship must be championed and instilled in all youth.
    * Get the damn girls out of the Boy Scouts. Girl Scouts is where they belong. Any adult homosexual recruiting and buggering a boy scout receives the Death Sentence. The Boy Scouts of America used to be Iconic GOOD. The bedrock of developing fine upstanding CITIZENS.
    * Deport Communist University Staff Members. Get them the hell out of this country. The “Long March through the Universities” has been going on for 80 years. Time to end it.

    Drop Bizarre Pedo-Freaks into a Wood Chipper:

    * Transgenderism is a mental disorder. Any parent encouraging their six-year-old boy to cut his dick off loses their rights as a parent. Their child will be removed from that house and placed with loving, mentally sound parents.

    * Anyone touting NAMBLA gets dropped into a wood chipper.
    * Any Drag Queen dancing in front of a neon sign, “It’s not gonna suck Itself”, in front of children gets dropped into a wood chipper:

    * Celebrities engaging in foul satanic Debauchery get dropped into a Wood chipper:

    And: Of course, Drop this piece of shit into a wood chipper.

    * Why is there an entire Gay Pride MONTH and just one, single DAY day allotted to Veterans????
    * Why is there a Black History MONTH and not a WHITE HISTORY MONTH?

    * Audit the Federal Reserve annually. Bring the Federal Reserve under direct control and oversight by the US Congress. Release all Audits to the Public every year.

    * Expose the Climate HOAX. And stop the Go Green insanity. Embrace clean Nuclear energy.
    * Publicly Hang Anthony Fauci
    * Expose the COVID-19 Pandemic and publicly hang everyone involved.
    * Strip Bill Gates of his citizenship, seize all of his farmland, and deport this zionist cunt to Israel.
    * Hold MSM accountable for PROPAGANDA. Levy heavy fines for their Partisan activities. Journalists have a solemn duty to report unbiased news. “Commentators” should be held accountable for their statements.

    Illegal Drugs and our Southern Border – America’s Fentanyl Epidemic:
    * Institute summary field executions of anyone smuggling Fentenal across our southern border. Put them on their knees and shoot them in the back of the head. Mules will be executed on the spot.
    * Seal up our southern border.
    * Declare war on Mexico, invade this shit hole country – absolutely obliterate all drug cartels – no arrest…everyone dies. If their corrupt shit hole country can’t manage itself….then we will. The absolute corruption of Mexico is a bigger threat to America than all middle east countries combined.

    Big Pharma and Anthony Fauci:
    * Ban Big Pharm Advertising dollars. Big Pharma can only push its drugs through hospital visits or printed media.
    Anthony Fauci – The highest paid government official. “Dr. Fauci was appointed Director of NIAID in 1984. He oversees an extensive research portfolio of basic and applied research to prevent, diagnose, and treat established infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS, respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases, tuberculosis and malaria as well as emerging diseases such as Ebola and Zika. NIAID also supports research on transplantation and immune-related illnesses, including autoimmune disorders, asthma and allergies. The NIAID budget for fiscal year 2022 is approximately \$6.3 billion.

    This piece of shit is the gatekeeper for all US-based state-funded research. His corruption and dereliction of duty have allowed Big Pharma to escape punishment for a whole host of vacinne-related illnesses ( Autism, ADD..etc). Seize all his assets. Immediately audit him. This troll has been coving up Big Pharma corruption for 40 YEARS.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  118. Che Guava says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Full-term abortion is just an ugly euphemism for infanticide. Yet that is what many U.S. politicians of the ‘left’, almost all Democrats, support. It is truly clown
    world in the most horrid way.

    The ban should also be for much earlier
    term abortions, except from rape, in which case first trimester abortions are banned except in such cases, a woman knows when she is pregrant within a month, unless she is on heavy drugs.

    The rape exception should only apply in the first trimester, and after that, if the woman hasn’t understandably eliminated it by the second, she should have to bring it to term, and offer it suckers for adoption.

    In Japan, one of our Buddhist cult things is Jizo Bosatsu.

    Jizo has several facets, a historically recent one is

    • Replies: @KDE1711
  119. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Craig Nelsen

    In long, The Son Also Rises, by Gregory Clark.

  120. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Craig Nelsen

    Calling it liberty is softballing the issue.

    Egalitarians are envy-worshippers and the end result of unleavened egalitarianism is mass starvation.

    Egalitarians can’t speak in good faith, because what they actually want redistributed is not wealth, but social status. Anyone directly demanding social status immediately loses social status, so they have to lie.

    Egalitarianism is stone-age economics and cannot remotely support an industrial society. Indeed modern egalitarians are often childish caricatures of genuine paleolithic nomad thinkers.
    This makes it especially funny when they claim to be especially educated and cosmopolitan. So sophisticated they managed to come up with sibling rivalry as a national fiscal plan.

  121. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Alexandros

    Broke: ad hominem is a fallacy
    Woke: personnel is policy

    Caveat: ad hominem is indeed a fallacy in certain contexts, in particular when both sides are sane* and discussing purely matters of fact, not value or judgment.

    *(So, nobody on the internet.)

  122. Realist says:
    @DeclineoftheAmericanEmpire

    Democracy has its weaknesses but is not that bad a system; if it were the United States would not have lasted over 200 years of steadily rising wealth and power…

    One of those weaknesses is… steadily rising wealth and power for the few…at the expense of the rest.

  123. Che Guava says:

    I reply to myself because I accidentally hit ‘post’, and wasn’t able to finish in time.

    The historically recent one is Jizo of education.

    Traditionally, Jizo was for children who died in time of war, in childbirth, as miscarriages, or in accidents when too young.

    Now, almost certainly, except at the ‘of education’, most are praying mainly for aborted children, their own.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  124. Johan says:
    @Biff

    The reason why slanderers and fools have turned it around, is that there has actually not been so much intelligent criticism on the Nazis, and the Jews with their so called Holocaust managed to steal the show. A few years with Psycho Hitler and his gang of bandits would make all these naive slanderers of Churchill call for their mommy, unless they are bandits themselves, or unless they have a slave nature, just like many who originally voted for a gang of the most intelligent psychopaths learned the hard way what they chose for.
    Since in a democracy, totalitarianism always lives somewhere in the neighborhood, it is a good thing that the mainstream has a simplified grip on the narratives, else many fools would be invited to try their luck with a club of psychopaths.

    In one fairly innocent looking essay, Hitler gives an insight of his plans. Art, he writes, should be the expression of the general will, which is totalitarianism, where the general will, is his will. He also argues that modernity needs more light, that everything from now will be in the full light. Having the Nazi aesthetics and culture in mind, for instance, the mass gatherings, and the structures which they built for the puppet gatherings, it means that there will be no more privacy, intimacy, individuality, sollitude and gatherings and meetings of people other than the controlled gatherings in full broad light, under the tight all seeing eye and discipline of the Nazis, everything out in the open, a totalitarianism of unprecedented nature. In other words, there will be no more times and places and covers and atmosphere to think and feel your own thoughts and feelings, and to share with others. No room to create culture other than the full exposure culture which the Nazi top controlled.

    Anyway, apologists of the Nazis, whether naive fools or otherwise.. may still get their totalitarian society someday.

    The writer Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn came towards a sophisticated understanding of the totalitarianist horror which the Nazi’s stood for. But meanwhile, for the masses and their pundits, the tight control of the WWII is a good thing, though I would not be surprise if the democracies turn into another form of creeping totalitarianism, while they are staring themselves blind on the works of a gang of dead pyschopaths.

    • Replies: @Swaytonious
  125. Johan says:
    @Biff

    That Churchill was a drunkard is also the slander of a group of biased people sinking to the level of petty gossiping housewives. Especially made for losers. His usage of alcohol was limited, there are many people who live with a controlled daily intake of alcohol, able to function perfectly with it, also on high levels. It is a clever projection of slanderous writers, for those who themselves cannot handle alcohol.

  126. @Fr. John

    Yes, absolutely the Truth. It’s a hard truth for most westerners who have been fed the poison of egalitarianism. Yet it needs to be said. Perhaps a saner and future generation will appreciate it.

  127. The US is supposed to be a representative republic, but in reality it is a zionist controlled dictatorship and the control has its foundation in the zionist privately owned FED and IRS, 2 of the 10 planks of the communist manifesto.

    The veiled picture of the reptilian shape shifter, says it all about who is really in control, see David Ickes book The Biggest Secret, it can be had on amazon, also the slogan, build back better , is a communist slogan, which means to destroy the existing society and build a one world communist government in its place.

  128. @Old and Grumpy

    Well said OAG. It really does begin when men are fixed.

    • Replies: @Jack Kennedy
  129. @Mike Fridelle

    Many good things are said in your comments. I would agree with most of them. There is one that is not so good: “Limit the number of Jews in politics. An ethnic group that makes up only 2% of our population should not equate to a staggering 50% of Joe Biden’s cabinet.”

    Jews, in my view, should not be permitted in any number. They have a corrupting influence even in small numbers. They have a long historical pattern of cultural subversion, bringing economic ruin to their host countries, and these extremely divisive and neurotic people are parasitical by nature. They cannot be trusted in any numbers. They bring strife, deception, and they have strong proclivities toward perversion and vice.

    • Replies: @Mike Fridelle
  130. Johan says:
    @Observator

    Your interpretation of the words of Madison amounts to democratic propaganda, classical demagogic soapbox incitement, which the founding fathers feared, justifiable. The mass democracy will always be on its way to a people’s utopia, which is the peoples totalitarianism. The founding fathers understood very well where a democracy tends to lead to. Thus the founding fathers designed a system which should be a balance between elite rule, preventing too much power in the hand of an elite, and popular rule, preventing democratic tyranny by masses of people. The US already early on slowly morphed into a demagogic mass democracy, where corrupt elites rule through demagogy, where corruption is widespread, where money rules, the lust for power is unbridled, and cultural decline is all over the place.

    If the US would not have turned into a demagogic democracy, today it could be a cultural world leader by example, but because the culture of the US went democratically downhill, and its culture by now is extremely inferior to the culture produced during the best times of European cultural flourishing, it needs aggressive and brutal force to maintain its position in the world. Culturally the US nowadays is about a dessert, if not for the European culture which it inherited, it would be total philistinism.

  131. Truth says:

    Anglinstein, the Big Bad Nazis are coming for you and your children…

    https://worldstar.com/videos/wshhf6XokQOtoh8YZC0k/16yearold-ukrainian-boxer-diana-petrenko-raises-nazi-flag-while-accepting-silver-medal

    (Yes I know you will never have any, but it just reads more ominous that way).

  132. Richard B says:
    @Anon

    Nothing like a good old ad hominem to make my day! Thanks for proving my point.

    Democracy is when someone like you writes a comment that is more like an article full of hogwash to discuss another article that is full of hogwash.

    Where’s the hogwash in my comment or in AA’s article?
    Could you be specific? You don’t know and can’t argue. So you fly off the handle with an ad hominem like the triggered sissy mary troll that your comment proves you to be.

    If you can’t be specific or argue intelligently then it’s Denunciation without Refutation. In short, trolling.

    And exactly how long have you been suffering from the delusion that anyone needs or wants your approval? If you have a problem with your parents you haven’t worked out then seek counselling, don’t troll a website’s comment section. How pathetic can you get?

    Democracy is when we have little or no time to dissect the verbal masturbation of either you or the author and opt instead to use our time to be more productive by taking a dump.

    Since your comment also proves that your brains are for shit – you ought to know.

    Get a life man !

    Haha! A troll triggered by a comment enough to dash off a moronic ad hominem is telling someone else to get a life. Yeah, you really are delusional.

  133. KDE1711 says:
    @Towey

    Fascinating.
    What are your thoughts on student loan debt forgiveness? Since two generations of Americans were bombarded their entire childhood and adolescence with pro-college propaganda from Wall Street, the media, and the schools, I believe it’s entirely just to wipe out college debt. I know that many gender studies airheads would benefit, but that’s irrelevant. The gullibility and questionable morals of the victim never legitimizes the criminal.
    As for the people who’ve already paid off their debt or a substantial portion of it, the solution is simple: shutter most of the colleges, confiscate their wealth, and return it to the customers.

    • Replies: @Johan
    , @Johan
  134. @RockaBoatus

    don’t let the \$3 betas adopt ……… they’ll become extinct

  135. Richard B says:
    @CelestiaQuesta

    Whites need to start advocating for reservations and acquiring gambling casino licenses.

    They won’t even give whites that.

    Tax Slaves, Sex Workers, Imprisonment, Torture and Death (as violent and as nasty as they can make it). That’s the future of whites in the West, especially in the USA.

    In fact, for the most part, the future’s already here. Sertiously though, if that’s what the hostile elite really wanted, who is going to stop them? Certainly not whites.

  136. KDE1711 says:
    @anonymous

    Islam is basically just an inversion of feminism. Both belief systems view women as mere beasts guided by their clits, and allow the wealthiest and most unhinged men to hog all of them up. The only difference is that feminists want women to choose to become concubines, rather than to be forced into it. The result is the same.

    • LOL: Malla
  137. Johan says:

    What about this definition, if I may democratically contribute:

    Democracy is the people’s ban of envy on wit, humor, good taste, and intelligence, and the most successful exorcism of genius.

  138. I think H.L. Mencken had it right when he said, “Democracy is a theory of government whereby you give the people what they want, and you give it to them good and hard.”

    • Replies: @Johan
  139. @anonymous

    Look at the countries around the world where islam is prevalent. All are some of the most backward with some of the lowest IQ populations.

    If it weren’t for oil and gas found under the ground the muslims sit on they would still be cooking with camel shit. It is only with fuel revenues that they can purchase modern conveniences from actual developed nations that by and large think Islam is the religion of the violent and generally incompetent.

    • Replies: @KDE1711
  140. There has never been a version of ‘the Right’ outside of Libertarian America that thought that ‘leaving people alone’ was the goal of their political program.

    What we are seeing is that different political factions ape the manners and tactics of their opposites such that the Left aped the ‘in your face’ attitude of the European Right and then brought that totalitarian perspective to the New World.

    The only real political camps are racial-identitarian versus everything else. If you believe can have a single economic or political or social system that can provide adequate service to a ‘multi-racial’ or ‘multi-cultural’ communal space, it doesn’t matter if you call yourself ‘left’ or ‘right’ or ‘conservative’ or ‘liberal’, you’re opposed to racial identities.

    If you think that races cannot be successfully mixed within the same system, you’re doing an altogether different politics from ‘left’ or ‘right’ or ‘conservative’ or ‘liberal’ or any other brand-name that opposes racial separation and racial self-regard (at least for Whites).

  141. Johan says:
    @Minnesota Mary

    Mencken himself was a inevitably to an extent a product of US democracy, thus the style of his definition is somewhat brutally plane, American style, like flushing a toilet.

  142. KDE1711 says:
    @RoatanBill

    I agree about Islam, but have a question for you about IQ. I think it’s a disingenuous fixation on the part of race realists. I have no desire to live among blacks, but if IQ rather than healthy preference for one’s own kind is to be the deciding factor, then what are we to do about the many low-IQ whites? IQ is a rather arbitrary indicator of intelligence. The working poor are cerebrally mediocre, but isn’t the ability to cope with economic hardship through street smarts and hard work an equally valid form of intelligence as the ability to design a machine or perform surgery? Civilization wouldn’t function without laborers. I’m more cultured and literate than the average American and have taught myself five languages, but I’m also woefully absent-minded and struggle to master routine tasks. I’ve never measured my IQ, but if it’s above average, then so much for it.
    The obsession with IQ logically leads to the the transhumanist, depopulation nightmare of Schwab, Gates, and their ilk.
    Is it not better to stress natural tribal prejudice as the basis of our antipathy to multiculturalism, rather than IQ?
    Forgive me if I’ve made false assumptions about your perspective.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  143. Whites are weak. White weaklings should be called Wheaks, Wheaklings, or Whimps.

    Spiritually owned by homos, politically and morally owned by Jews, sexually owned by blacks.

    The ONLY times whites show aggressive passion is against their own race and interests.

    No white marched for white victims of blacks, but so many were willing to join black mobs to attack and burn cities when Floyd died of fentanyl overdose.

    Why are whites like that? They are weak of mind, soul, and body. They are owned by Jews, Homos, blacks, and the Other. Wheaklings have no agency, no center. They rely on Jews for the answers.

    • Agree: Miro23
    • Troll: David Burberry
  144. Johan says:
    @KDE1711

    The self conceited image of the democratic mediocre public, that they are fit for higher education is a matter of envious vanity and cultural aggressiveness, which the marketeers cleverly exploited. I am not sure whether that should be paid by others. If it has to be paid for by others, while the democratic public of mediocrity through access to higher education also seriously lowered the level of higher education, that would amount to a double burden at the expense of others.

    On the other hand, there is the argument that the education provided for is not worth the money. On account of that argument, I would argue for a full refund, rather than debt forgiveness.

  145. Johan says:
    @KDE1711

    In short, no euphemisms of any sort, trying to conceal.
    A refund, coupled with admittance of guilt on both sides: ‘we accept no forgiveness for manipulating us into obtaining your con products, and whatever of it was qualitative and worth the money, we admit it was wasted on us’.

    • Agree: KDE1711
  146. Assault Weapon or Assault Rifle should be called Defense Weapon or Defense Rifle. After all, they are NOT used for hunting but for defending one’s life, family, property, and liberty. They are for defense, therefore we need to call them DEFENSE WEAPONS or DEFENSE RIFLES.

  147. @KDE1711

    Intelligence is what moves civilization forward. The productive people in the trades (electrician, plumber, mechanic, etc) are all vital components of a functioning economy and society and these are the IQ average folks that maintain what’s already been engineered / created. An IQ north of 120 is what invents new technologies, designs new products, solves old problems and has the curiosity to become the scientists and engineers that realize what questions to ask and what issues need investigating.

    The US military has a cut off of an 82 IQ. Through testing, anyone below that figure can’t be productive in the military where intellect isn’t a high priority but having a blank slate mind that follows orders is paramount. There’s a huge portion of the US population that’s well below the 100 IQ average, uneducated by choice and temperament, entitled to “free stuff” via indoctrination and their numbers are growing. They are parasites on the working productive population.

    The low IQ people are more and more a problem as the available jobs are trending to require more intelligence. It doesn’t matter what color, religion or any other characteristic these people can claim. If they are too unintelligent, then they become a problem for the society to move forward because they are to some extent dead weight and many vote for a living to ensure their gravy train doesn’t stop.

    The “west” is in the process of self destruction due at least in part to the pandering for votes that lead to ridiculous policies. It’s the stupid in the society that’s being catered to.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Alexandros
    , @KDE1711
  148. @RoatanBill

    Intelligence is necessary to sustain civilization but it does not drive it forward. If it did the Jews would have had a civilization at one point but they never did.

    What drives it forward is innovation, and innovation is borne from the idea that there is something outside yourself. It has nothing to do with bettering yourself. If it was there would be plenty of easier, more profitable ways for an intelligent, hard working man to enrich himself. That’s why Jews end up being master merchants and bankers, their entire being is centered around self aggrandizement. Mongolians have the very same problem which is why you see so little innovation with them.

    Where you find these things is among emphatic and naive white people. Mostly German stock. They are the only ones with both the intelligence and the humanity to create advanced civilizations.

    Intelligence in the hands of immoral people is dangerous and destructive. If I was looking to sustain a civil society I would take loyalty over brains any day.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  149. KDE1711 says:
    @RoatanBill

    Even high-skilled professionals will be put out of work by AI. Software has already replaced lawyers to a large extent; it could easily replace doctors. Today’s hyper-elites are not the most intelligent and deserving; they’re rapacious misanthropes out to create a techno-communism of the 1% in which the overwhelming majority will be killed or enslaved.
    Technology that erodes our wealth and freedom doesn’t have to be invented, and it’s the mad engineers behind it who are the useless ones.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  150. I heard traffic accidents were up but this is too much.

  151. @Alexandros

    To envision a nuclear reactor, a jet engine, a new chemical process, etc requires intelligence. All innovations require intelligence.

    there is something outside yourself

    Philosophical bullshit devoid of meaning.

    • Replies: @Johan
  152. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Explain EXACTLY why one should be punished by God and the other by man?

    No word salad Orwellian NewSpeak allowed.

  153. @Priss Factor

    > Assault Weapon or Assault Rifle should be called Defense Weapon or Defense Rifle. After all, they are NOT used for hunting but for defending one’s life, family, property, and liberty

    Yeah they are stop making shit up. So called assault weapons are available in numerous hunting calibers.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  154. @Priss Factor

    Yeah you sound exactly like a typical gaslighting jew supremacist.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  155. @KDE1711

    AI is hyped to suggest that computers can think. They can’t. AI is a system that has been constructed by real human being developers that write code to allow the application to write it’s own decision tables and rewrite them based on success / failure metrics. Take away the human and there is no AI worth mentioning. AI relies on “learning” which is a term purposely chosen to imply the ability to learn which implies cognition when in actuality it is just running test scenarios that either succeed or fail and the decision tables are altered accordingly. It’s not magic.

    If a machine can put a highly skilled professional out of work, then they weren’t highly skilled to begin with.

    A lawyer has no identifiable skill except in a contrived situation. It is one of the fraudulent professions totally dependent on a given jurisdiction’s made up laws. Take that lawyer to a foreign jurisdiction and he ceases to be skilled. Now consider a chemical engineer. Take him or her anywhere in the world and they can function because they have an actual skill not dependent on some made up nonsense.

    The medical “profession” is largely made up of Big Pharma salespeople that we, the patients, get to pay for. Very few are surgeons with a clearly identifiable skill set. Very few are quality diagnosticians that ask the right questions, call for the right tests and then properly evaluate the results. The vast majority baby sit neurotics with insurance that run to the doctor for every sniffle. Take away the GP’s prescription pad by eliminating the concept of prescription medications and have everything over the counter, and huge percentages of GP’s would go bankrupt. Take away the machines that engineers invented and they would be prescribing bloodletting and leeches.

    Your prose leads me to believe that you don’t understand technology and as a result think it’s voodoo that needs to be curbed. It is the gov’t that you probably vote for that is the largest evil in the world that creates currency out of thin air via their fraud known as independent central banking that funds projects that shouldn’t exist and wouldn’t exist in a truly free market. You, the voter, are the ultimate problem.

  156. @David Burberry

    Don’t be a dammy.

    That aint gaslighting but splash of cold water or a hard paddle on the ass.

    Whites must be humiliated and shamed for their weakness.

    When even the US military caves and bend over to globo-homo, whites have come to accept their weakness as a kind of virtue. They are WHEAKS.

    They must be called out as such.

    So, what’s your idea? To tell these weak whites that they are A-Okay?

    Don’t be a wheak yourself.

    • Replies: @Malla
  157. @David Burberry

    The purpose of such weapons is military and combat, not to hunt.

    Sure, you can hunt with it, but that’s not the purpose.

    Most hunters use rifles designed for hunting and they don’t look like combat weapons.

    It’d be stupid to go hunting with something that looks like M-16.

    • Troll: RoatanBill
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  158. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Fr. John

    Most men aren’t the sovereign of their own body either.

    They keep thoughtlessly surrendering it to me when I walk into a room. I don’t want it! Go away!

    Imagine what they do with someone who’s trying and is motivated to seize their minds.

  159. Miro23 says:
    @Priss Factor

    Whites are weak. White weaklings should be called Wheaks, Wheaklings, or Whimps.

    Spiritually owned by homos, politically and morally owned by Jews, sexually owned by blacks.

    Agreed. It’s a collapsed society that has lost all its anchor points. Societies like this fade from history – which is in fact the Jewish project dating from their 22nd November 1963 Regime Change coup d’état.

  160. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    Every race was trying to conquer the world. Whites, specifically the British, managed it. (Twice.)

    I agree. Caucasians are weak.
    Goes to show the terrible state of everyone else.

    Even with the GAE in its self-tormented, crippled state, everyone else has to walk on eggshells around Aunti Sammie. Pathetic.

  161. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Che Guava

    edit
    ctrl-a for select-all
    ctrl-x for cut
    save

    This will delete your comment.

    Start new comment. ctrl-v. Back where you started, but with no timer.

    Caveat: it will fail if you get caught in the spam filter, since it also prevents you from editing a comment.

    • Thanks: Che Guava
  162. KDE1711 says:
    @RoatanBill

    The only entertaining part of Hell will be all the engineers spending eternity drafting escape blueprints.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  163. @RoatanBill

    kde1711: stuff that in your pipe and smoke it

  164. @KDE1711

    What, no detailed analysis of all the errors, mistakes and lies I told? I explain how the world works and all you’ve got is that lame comeback that just demonstrates you live in religious lala land?

    Let me help you out. There is no hell or heaven. There is no god or satan. It’s all bullshit invented by a religious oligarchy that plays you like a fiddle. That’s one of the drawbacks to being a shallow thinker.

    Before you die, consider finding the engineer nearest you and reverently kissing his ass because his brains allow for your very existence.

    • LOL: KDE1711
    • Replies: @KDE1711
    , @Emslander
  165. @Here Be Dragon

    Have you guys been spending as much as you can really afford you would be living in a third-world country condition – no more big houses with a pool, no more big cars, two-bedroom apartments in a multi-story building, and a small car instead, like most people in the world have.

    Not everyone likes to live like a slav(e)ic subhuman commie. And in China/Asia and Africa, non retarded people have their own generational houses and some pieces of land, no matter how small. This is real living. Only with godless subhuman slav(e)s/amerimutts did the world enter this phase of cramped, slave-like living even for normal, productive peasants.

    Such is the wage of genetic inferiority.

    After this is all over, the world will remember the plague of godless materialism and mammon worship and the inferior races who forced it upon the world:
    -The jews
    -The slav(e)s
    -The mixed mutt New World spawns who descended from Europe

  166. Here’s some more ‘democracy’. Doncha just love it?

    So, how does it work? The smart Jews go into finance, tech, medicine, and the like, and the idiotic ones go into politics and media? Not that the smart ones are more ethical, but…

    • Agree: Miro23
    • Replies: @Johan
  167. Johan says:
    @RoatanBill

    Philosophical bullshit is a bit strong, it is rather clumsily formulated. Healthy civilizations are based on objectivity, thus aligning with the objective world (which also implies discoveries, and thus innovation). Civilizations in decline depart (more and more) from a subjective world. Our contemporary civilization, in despite of all the science is continually moving towards a preference for the subjective. The sofists in the democracy of Athens where also subjectivists. The subjective is so to say the swamp, the inwards turned, the very limited, the illusory, that what prevents cultural growth etc.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    , @Alrenous
  168. KDE1711 says:
    @RoatanBill

    You atheistic eugenics types, for all your undoubtable intellectual prowess, have a rather peculiar strategy of promoting your viewpoint. You tell people they’re inferior, stupid, useless, dead weight, and so on, and then furiously ridicule them for rejecting your Darwinian materialist cosmology.
    You’re going to be an immortal disembodied brain hooked up to a virtual reality global mind machine, when my kind will have long since gone extinct (except for the clones to be used for sex and experimentation). Why exactly does it bother you so much what I think?
    Fortunately for decent people, God is real, and He’ll sort out the people who believe in Hell from the ones who go there.
    Good day to you, sir.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    , @GomezAdddams
  169. Johan says:
    @Priss Factor

    The democracy, to formulate it euphemistically, does not allow for the optimal arrangement and exercise of intelligence, thus those who have certain outstanding talents, steal the show, even less likely stopped when they are extremely fanatic and self centered.

  170. mcohen says:

    This article is straight out of Russian disinformation playbook 101

    https://warontherocks.com/2016/10/whodunnit-russia-and-coercion-through-cyberspace/

    • Troll: Mario Partisan
  171. @Johan

    I haven’t a clue to what you’re talking about.

    My mind was never marinated in the social sciences or humanities crap to be able to come up with your kind of word salad.

    • Replies: @Johan
  172. @KDE1711

    My viewpoint, as you call it, is the truth as I experience it. Truth is that which can be verified with evidence. All else is not truth.

    Darwinism is a theory; I don’t believe theories, only proof. That Darwin may have some things right is probable, but the theory as a whole is speculation and conjecture not to be taken too seriously.

    I don’t care what you think in general. You contacted me with some halfwit ideas and I was doing you a favor by explaining how the cow at the cabbage. Instead of thanking me for your enlightenment you placed my kind in hell. I say that makes you an ingrate.

    By mentioning religious nonsense, I felt an obligation to try to warn you that your mind is being manipulated by some of the worst criminal in the society, the clergy. Religion has been one of the two worst inventions of mankind, the other being government. You see, god didn’t create man, man created god to use as a propaganda tool against weak minds.

    Only for the willingly delusional is god real. Had you taken an education in the things that are real, like engineering, you would have been spared the indoctrination the humanities and social sciences spew.

  173. Johan says:
    @RoatanBill

    Here is a site, run by AI engineers, they are toyboys, but they appear to have plain common sense, they target hypes about AI. One of them called the robot Sofia ‘a rubber doll with a bandrecorder’, or something like that:

    https://www.skynettoday.com/

  174. Zhao says:

    Excellent writing today Mr Anglin.

    • Disagree: Corvinus
  175. @Old and Grumpy

    You’re watching TV. That’s your problem. You’re seeing what Hollywood and ilk want you to see.

    Go to a gun range, construction site or car show etc, and you won’t see any of that crap.

  176. @HeebHunter

    Yes, whatever.

    Soon we are going to bomb you into the Mad Max movie. Aqua-Cola and shit.

    Good night.

  177. denk says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    Chinese brutally attacked in USAss
    Chinese brutally attacked in FUK
    Chinese brutally attacked in CANADA
    Chinese brutally attacked in OZ
    Chinese brutally attacked in NZ

    ‘wn’

    Down with Chinese immigrants overclass

    Fuck Han Race Power

    tsk tsk tsk
    Is that a sick joke ?
    They cut you up then rub salt into the wound, ~!

  178. @Anon

    So says the resident goofball!!!

  179. Johan says:
    @Priss Factor

    The depicted weapon is a war slaughtering machine for the braindead. Real men have have weapons of which the usage is an art. War slaughtering machines for braindead beasts should be forbidden, and no one should care if the gov should come blast of your head if you own one. Freaking moron, whats next, a tank to defend ‘family, property, and liberty’?

    • Replies: @Anon
  180. Sisifo says:
    @Chris Moore

    Are fascists not right-wing?

    No, technically they are third positionists. Mussolini’s fascism was a mix of socialist policies together with nationalism, not much different from modern Chinese “communism”.

    There were many progressives among fascists, and arguably the Ventennio (the 20 years of Fascism) was the historical period when most people improved their quality of life, most schools in Italy used nowadays were built during Fascism, for examplem

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  181. Sisifo says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    IM-BECILE. Russia is ruled by many people, and Putin is President. God I hate the brainwashed ignoramuses.

    You see? When you don’t write about global warming BS you actually make sense quote often.

    By the way, Vladimir Vladimirovich yesterday in St. Petersburg couldn’t suppress a smile when he was talking about how the West is shooting itself in the foot with renewables…

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  182. Johan says:
    @RoatanBill

    As there appears to be not so much brain activity, you should not crack your head over these things anyway. And if your bored, why don’t you get a life instead of commenting on what is too difficult.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  183. Glinka33 says:
    @Kim

    If an intelligent description of America’s political system is a “leg pull from the 70s” , don’t trip over in the 20s.

  184. Glinka33 says:
    @Priss Factor

    These weapons do defend us from school children, church attendees, hospital employees, college students, concert audiences , shoppers, mall walkers, movie goers, museum gawkers and all the other vicious, horrible scum that pose an existential threat to the owners of battlefield weapons.

  185. Anonymous[356] • Disclaimer says:
    @DeclineoftheAmericanEmpire

    US was never intended to be nor has it every been a “democracy”. The Founding Fathers overwhelmingly hated democracy as did the Greeks from whom they drew their inspiration.

    • Agree: littlereddot
  186. Hoyeru says:

    let’s see…
    Ancient Greece, where this famous “democracy” comes from, had slaves, and only the rich were allowed to vote. Women, the poor and the slaves could not vote.. Yet ancient Greece was a constitutional republic, no “democracy” there. Plus ancient Greece loved pederasts.
    “Modern” USA which claims to have have that “democracy” thing: had slaves, and only the rich were allowed to vote. Women, the poor and the slaves could not vote. Yet USA is a constitutional republic, no “democracy” there. Plus, “modern” USA LOVES pederasts too.
    Yep sounds about right.

    BTW, Princeton study proved over a decade ago USA has no “democracy”.
    I’m SO sick of hearing that USA and so claled West have “democracy” and “freedom”, I have developed a Goering syndrome over the 2 words.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  187. @geokat62

    Why doesn’t someone with real nads go through the motions, sign the pledges, and once in office experience a “genuine” change of heart? Has anyone ever even tried that? Granted TPTB don’t like being double crossed, but that’s why I mentioned nads.

  188. @KDE1711

    I think you are forgetting one thing. America is not like other countries and past super-powers. It has a unique foundation. It was founded upon an idea, straight from the mind of God. That is why it is different. America is a dream come true for God, as it was His idea. It’s not going to fall. That’s why America is such a good friend of Israel’s. They have a lot in common.

  189. Xafer says:
    @Chris Moore

    Good point. But in a democratic system, only people who have lust for power will participate. The essential question is who watches the watcman!

    Also, capitalism and communism doesnt differ much. Capital tends to accumulate power, as we see today. Communism on the other hand, is a single party bureaucratic dictatorship. Only benefit of democracy therefore, is that when public opinion do gets mobilized as consequence of a focusing event, there can be some mass mobilization-however scope for such mobilization is also decreasing mainly due to cross corporate media ownership and surveillance of digital platforms.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  190. @HeebHunter

    Many Slavs owned land and houses in the countryside even during communism, as well as apartments or houses in the cities. It’s just that urban and collective lifestyles were promoted so they neglected their own land parcels while working on the collective ones and maintained their country houses as holiday homes. Probably on average they owned more property outright, and still do, than Westerners who own mortgages and debts. And taxes were also lower under communism. It was mostly the very wealthy that lost out under communism while under privatisation in former communist countries it is the common man that is losing out while the corrupt and rich are acquiring more property at the expense of the majority. It is a myth that under communism people didn’t own property, it’s just that your land and houses were considered personal property as they weren’t part of the productive system although some did work their own land for satisfying personal needs. Also, unless the government wanted your property, you were more likely to hold onto it, since selling it to private buyers who were looking for investments was unlikely, than in the post-communist world.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
    , @Alrenous
  191. Emslander says:
    @RoatanBill

    Let me help you out. There is no hell or heaven. There is no god or satan.

    It seems horribly unjust, but when the end of Roatan the god comes around he will remember what the good nuns taught him back in third grade, repent of his lack of faith and his sins and make a very heartfelt Act of Contrition. Then he’ll be there in heaven with some of the rest of us, wearing a sheepish grin.

    • LOL: RoatanBill, KDE1711
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  192. @Johan

    Why don’t you write in sentences that make sense?

  193. @Emslander

    The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can change this.
    Albert Einstein

    When you understand why you don’t believe in other people’s gods, you will understand why I don’t believe in yours.
    Albert Einstein

    • Replies: @apollonian
    , @HeebHunter
  194. Anon[275] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johan

    Are you from Sweden?

  195. Corvinus says:
    @Alexandros

    “The world does not run on argument, it runs on force. “Every winning argument is backed by force.”

    Absolutes like this do not exist in the real world. It’s only when the “losing side” of the argument resists in some way that force may be used, whether it be indirect or direct.

    “Attacking the source is not a bug in the human condition, it’s a feature. It is our defense against enemies trying to trick us.”

    Who are these “enemies” trying to “trick” you?

    “If you can’t trust the information to be true or unbiased, and obviously it won’t be when emanating from a political opponent, you are right in rejecting it.”

    Except the problem here is that when a person rejects that information without critical examination, he or she becomes a slave to confirmation bias. They only accept what they seek to conform to a preconceived idea.

    “There is no objectivity”

    A lamp is run by electricity. That is an objective.

    “or true rationality in this world.”

    From your perspective, what is “true rationality”?

    “Adolf Hitler understood these things perfectly. You may not be right but you still have to make decisions.”

    Which led to the murders of millions of innocent people.

    “Attacking those decisions on the premise they might be wrong is counterproductive and ultimately futile.”

    There is objective right and wrong. For example, it was completely wrong for Hitler to invade Czechoslovakia, a sovereign nation which had not made repeated, direct threats against Germany.

  196. apollonian says: • Website
    @RoatanBill

    The Important Part Of “Religion” Is The CORE Philosophy, Suckers

    “Roatan…,” who imagines he’s clever says,

    “there is no god or satan.”

    Roatan then, convinced he’s such a clever fellow, so satisfied w. himself, doesn’t even think to realize THERE’S NO WAY TO PROVE THERE’S NO GOD–can’t be done, sucker. Such is the simple fallacy of “atheism.” But atheism is a stage which many good Christians have to go through to complete their Oddysean-style journey of intellect.

    And “satan” (or Satanism)?–is merely ANYONE who imagines he (or she) is god by means of extreme subjectivism, as of Immanuel Kant, who says consciousness/mentality creates reality, thus making oneself to be God, the creator.

    And for Christians (though admittedly, not all who say they’re “Christian” really understand it), Christ literally = TRUTH, sucker (Gosp. JOHN 14:6). The “Christ” figure is mere anthropo-morphic substitute in the New Test. story. Just imagine truth as God then giving itself a human representation, dramatizing the great suffering that truth goes through among humans who imagine they’re soooo smart, like u.

    Especially, imagine COLLECTIVISTIC Satanism, as in form of free-masons (or other “liberal” groups) and Judaism/Talmudism (see Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best expo), whence a large group or gang insists collectively they’re God–and this really exists, and can be eminently well proven and demonstrated as has been done by many–has even been admitted and proudly proclaimed by the practitioners, sucker.

    Such then is the great glory of New Testament literature, following the Old Test. The magnificent success of New Test. then is the Christ figure, having given the metaphysical premise, goes on then to expound the ethical implications, consequences, and overall vision–which such ethics Christianity is rightly and understandably revered by all peoples of all races and cultures (even the Musselmen)–especially when Christ and Christianity is understood in rationalist manner as literature telling and teaching a certain very philosophic kind of story and moral.

    Get a clue, chump. Christian “religion” then is mere dramatic adaptation and representation for the core essential philosophy, which philosophy by itself is very notoriously difficult to grasp for 90-95 % of humanity. And the lesson for us all is that such Christian TRUTH ALWAYS RESURRECTS, just when u wouldn’t expect it–the big joke on Jews, Pharisees, and Satanists throughout history.

    • LOL: RoatanBill
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  197. @apollonian

    No one has to prove there is no god just like no one has to prove there is no rainbow unicorn. It is the believers in religious nonsense that need to show some proof for the existence of some character that died, was resurrected and floated off somewhere. The inanity of that story can only be believed by someone deluded enough to suppress their logical abilities or never seriously developed any.

    It has nothing to do with being clever. Stating the empirically obvious only requires a willingness to do so in the face of irrational people. It’s not clever to say that rainbow unicorns don’t exist, for example.

    That someone can concoct your comment is something I truly marvel at. To realize that people exist today with such primitive beliefs when the world has explained so much of what the ancients thought was due to gods shows why governments exist. Religion is the gateway drug that leads to state worship.

    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
    Voltaire

    We can contrive a royal myth. We’ll say God commands life’s places. People must harden and degrade their hearts to where they properly belong. That would convince our community and increase state loyalty. Do you think they will believe it?
    Plato

    As for your name calling:
    When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers.
    Socrates

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Swaytonious
  198. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Xafer

    Also, capitalism and communism doesnt differ much. Capital tends to accumulate power, as we see today. Communism on the other hand, is a single party bureaucratic dictatorship. Only benefit of democracy therefore, is that when public opinion do gets mobilized as consequence of a focusing event, there can be some mass mobilization-however scope for such mobilization is also decreasing mainly due to cross corporate media ownership and surveillance of digital platforms.

    The ((Jews)) and their stooges seek a Communist-like dictatorship where the ZOG party elite have all the money, power and control on a global basis, and live like royalty, and everyone else lives like serfs and Palestinians.

    They’ve basically announced this to the world via the Great Reset crowd: You will own nothing, and be happy.

    That’s why I’m cheering for the America First “Deplorables,” cheering for populists, cheering for Russia, even cheering for the China targeted by ((Soros)) and ZOG… cheering for anyone capable of poking ZOG in the eye, and ultimately bringing it to its well-deserved end.

    The ((Jews)) literally want to rule the world with an iron fist. Yes, they’re that controlling, crazy and molested (physically and spiritually) by their rabbis and gurus.

  199. @RockaBoatus

    Sure, the age-old question, “The Jewish Question”. I have not come to the point where you are at. I don’t see ALL Jews as some genetic whole – predisposed to mental illness, anarchy, corruption, and predation. They tend to be tribal and are indeed very cohesive, but ALL are not evil.

    As Ford stated, it is the “International Jew” that is “The Worlds Foremost Problem”.

    Churchill also stated the same in his famous article, “Zionism vs Bolshevism – A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”

    I think the Jewish people populate many different socioeconomic strata just like White Europeans. The elites have the wealth to hire all the menial tasks out. They do not spend their time cooking, cleaning, buying groceries, mowing their lawns, cleaning the pool…etc. They spend their time READING, growing their businesses, and teaching their kids the same. The lower-level people play X-Box and fall asleep watching TikTok videos.

    The poorer level of Jews, their middle-class Jews, struggle and work shoulder to shoulder with we Goyim. Like the South after the Civil War – The Sharecropper and his Negro employees – Shoulder to Shoulder picking cotton. These Jews are not pathological in my opinion. They are just trying to get along and raise their families and honor the traditions and religion of their fathers. It is this level of Jew that suffers the great Pogroms –the local blowback after years of the International Jew fleecing the surrounding community with their Usery schemes. The International Jews have it down to an art. Always keeping a barometer on the local population – When the shit hits the fan, they flee to their private jets in the middle of the night, their ill-gotten wealth safely wired to an offshore account. They move “Internationally” to the next great feeding ground.

    There is the same socioeconomic structure of White European Elites and the lower class White Europeans. Joe Biden does not mow his own lawn. None of the Washington DC crowd would waste their time doing so. We Americans would be hated if we moved to Afghanistan, Iraq or Iran. The “Blowback” would be awful and the average worker bee American would have no idea why the Afghani people hated our guts and wanted to kill us. And our elites would tell us, “They hate you for your Freedoms”.

    This is the same propaganda horseshit the International Jew spews out onto worldwide Jewry. The Holocaust LIE is a prime example. This LIE is used as a never-ending recruitment tool for Israel and to keep the donations flowing to the International Jews’ political party of choice.

    I include the lower-level Jew as one of the victims of the Holocaust Swindle and as the poor sap stuck holding the bag, every damn time. I dated a Jewish girl for 8 years. She was a class act with an incredible work ethic. I respected her father immensely. He was the hardest working man I ever knew and totally self-made. He was a single dad with custody of his three kids. He never remarried. He was a dedicated father, kind and considerate and wise – but driven. He died from chain-smoking. His daughter now sits on the board of his charity. One of their latest board member decisions was to send ten thousand dollars to various Holocaust Museums so they can buy violins (true story).

    The question is, of the 50% of Joe Bidens Staff that are Jewish, how many of them come from extremely wealthy International Jewish families. I would guess ALL OF THEM. And they are there to subvert and terraform our country. No Doubt.

    • Replies: @Anon
  200. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Johan

    Postmodernism is literally just Protagoranism with the serial numbers filed off. Sophists constantly end up ruining the reputation of their own name and have to disavow themselves so they can adopt a new label.

  201. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Sisifo

    “Maybe if we only take a little cyanide, it won’t be poisonous.”

    Fascism is just Communism but after your faith is broken by the need to compromise with physics to avoid omnicidal starvation.

  202. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Hoyeru

    Democracy is of course the opposite of freedom.

    To have freedom first you must have self-ownership. Democracy is directly opposed to ownership and property rights of any kind.

    Democracy is totalitarian and reliably results in a totalitarian State; yet it abhors property rights so much even the State has trouble defending its own illegitimate prerogatives. Test: empirically speaking, what laws can America not make? What civilized activity can it not meddle with? If the answer is “none,” if they even try to hassle little kids with lemonade stands, then America is a totalitarianism.

    As demotism of all kinds always is.
    Good government is unpopular government.

  203. Anonymous[387] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    When you say “if abortion is a mortal sin the punishment for it will come from God” what you really mean is “humans aren’t allowed to punish people for it”.

    In reality God can and often does use the hands of Man to carry out punishments. God tells us that there are three things that are good and that he requires of us: To do justly. To love mercy. To walk humbly with him.

    Doing justly means, among many other things, personally ensuring the proper punishment of murderers such as abortionists.

    There is a reason that BOTH justice and mercy are required: without justice first being normally enforced, there can be nothing to be merciful about. If “mercy” is applied in all situations, there is no justice carried out.

    So next time you scream about someone punishing you, consider that it may be God instead that punishes you through the hands of Man.

  204. Realist says:
    @RoatanBill

    AI is hyped to suggest that computers can think. They can’t. AI is a system that has been constructed by real human being developers that write code to allow the application to write it’s own decision tables and rewrite them based on success / failure metrics. Take away the human and there is no AI worth mentioning. AI relies on “learning” which is a term purposely chosen to imply the ability to learn which implies cognition when in actuality it is just running test scenarios that either succeed or fail and the decision tables are altered accordingly. It’s not magic.

    Excellent points on AI. The suggestion that computers can think is preposterous. Strategic and abstract thinking are two qualities that humans have over AI. AI and computers are merely tools.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  205. Johan says:
    @RoatanBill

    To stay on topic, AI is like the intelligence of thinking in a democracy, it always goes in circles, it must be hyped because it doesn’t amount to much, and it learns at a speed which would make snails unable to perceive a change.

  206. @Realist

    I keep reading about all sorts of fabulous new capabilities, when in fact, they are mostly bullshit. By next Thursday, they’re going to aerosolize nano chips that when inhaled will purposely travel to the brain connect themselves to just the right ganglia using nano robotics and turn everyone into Democrats or drag queens.

    Futurists like Ray Kurzweil have been preaching the same trash for decades. They are all famous for being famous for predictions that haven’t happened. Any fool can make outrageous technological assertions and only another fool would deem them credible.

    These futurists are the Kardashians of the tech sector that people with humanities and social science degrees listen to because they have minds polluted with non scientific nonsense and are programmed specifically to not be able to distinguish between reality and their made up fantasy realms.

    AI has capabilities in pattern recognition and is only possible because chip speeds have increased to be able to sort through billions of possibilities in time sufficient to pick a most likely correct answer before a crash happens. Sometimes the most likely correct answer is wrong. These systems are all operating to reduce the error rate to what the society is willing to accept for certain conveniences they make possible, where said conveniences will be marketed to produce manufactured consent.

    A few thousand fatal crashes per year for the convenience of sleeping behind the wheel will be accepted as being “worth it” by the generations less and less capable as time progresses. These systems are dumbing down the population with their full and enthusiastic support.

    • Agree: Realist, Towey
  207. @Commentator Mike

    It is futile to rehabilitate the ussr, and you know it. The “kulaks” were by definition not the “extremely wealthy” oligarchs. Not to mention the main goal of marxism/communism/leftism, which is for man to devolve into sub-man.

    Fuck the kikes, fuck the oligarchs and fuck the commie apologetics.

  208. KDE1711 says:
    @Che Guava

    “The ban should also be for much earlier
    term abortions, except from rape“

    And how is the woman going to prove she was raped? And if she was, why should the infant pay?

    • Agree: Towey
  209. @RoatanBill

    >low IQ lolberturdian quoting the jewish fraud and plagiarist Ein-Stein

    The irony. No wonder why (((lolberturdianism))) has never existed.

    • Agree: KDE1711
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    , @KDE1711
  210. @HeebHunter

    I’d like your expert opinion.

    Are you the dumbest person on this site or do you know of anyone here with less intellect than you?

    I’m hoping you’re of the Neanderthal species so the low end of Homo Sapien doesn’t have to be reclassified for intelligence.

  211. KDE1711 says:
    @HeebHunter

    Libertarianism is just the white male version of wokeness. They’re equally shallow, simplistic, philistine, and hateful ideologies (even though libertarians happen to be right about 25% of the time).
    It would be fun to be a guard at a labor camp for libertarian political prisoners:
    “Is your market gonna come save you?”

    • Replies: @Anon
  212. Anon[275] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mike Fridelle

    predisposed to …, anarchy

    How so?

  213. Anon[275] • Disclaimer says:
    @KDE1711

    What does Libertarians want to impose on others (ref version of wokeness)?

    “Is your market gonna come save you?”

    …turn the other cheek?

    • Replies: @KDE1711
  214. @Sisifo

    Meanwhile India and Europe burn in unprecedented early heatwaves, the AMOC continues to weaken, once in 1200 year drought grips south-west USA, Lakes Mead and Powell dry up, coral reefs bleach around the world, and brainwashed morons say it isn’t happening. How such Evil gets so entrenched in primitive psyches might be an interesting subject for alien researchers, studying or electromagnetic traces, long after we self-destruct.

    • Replies: @Anon
  215. @Craig Nelsen

    Fair enough, but that doesn’t alter the fact that Whitey stole the richest piece of land on Earth, and has fucked it over for four hundred years, reaping great wealth from it, then went abroad to rape and pillage other lands, starting with Mexico, then the Philippines, Latin America, etc. Of course, ‘the way the world works’ has delivered us to ecological catastrophe. ‘O quam cito transit gloria mundi’.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    , @Swaytonious
  216. @Observator

    Or as John Jay, the first US Supreme Court Chief Justice was happy to observe-‘Those people who own this country are going to run this country’. One dollar, one vote.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  217. @JR Foley

    50% voting is MUCH too many. Cut it down to the top 25% of mostly MALE Americans and you’re heading in the right direction.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  218. KDE1711 says:
    @Anon

    What does Libertarians want to impose on others (ref version of wokeness)?

    Enslavement to corporations. Open borders. Legal drugs. Transhumanism.
    There’s nothing wrong with imposing things on people, so long as they’re good things like patriarchy, freedom from drugs and pornography, patriotism, etc. Libertarianism is a uniquely insidious and pernicious ideology precisely because it mendaciously claims to hold no values, prejudices, or agenda for people’s lives. Hiding behind the mask of liberal impartiality, the libertarian allows the interests of the rich to override both the dignity of the individual and the welfare of the collective. Humans find happiness and purpose in community and self-sacrifice, which is why libertarianism, with its nihilistic creed of greed, is a more inhumane ideology than both Marxism-Leninism and National Socialism.
    And don’t tell me that what I’ve described isn’t real libertarianism. If you libertarians were as smart as you think you are, you’d know how you all sound just like socialists.

    • Agree: Towey
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  219. @Priss Factor

    You are way out of your depth, man.
    Stop.
    No such thing as a “hunting” or “assault rifle”.
    But I get what you mean.

    ANYTHING available to a pig or an infantryman MUST be available to citizens. High explosives included, although there will have to be a convention on the safe storage of volatile and high-yield munitions, especially in urban areas. Ballistic personal armor, thermal, infrared, camo, APCs, and other armored vehicles also. 20mm rifles are about the limit for unregulated storage, IMHO. 40mm, HE/C4/Semtex, mortars, and such certainly need discussions, since they can cause actual damage by improper handling.

    Tanks, heavier vehicles, and weapons that can cause real war casualties (like howitzers and nukes, NBC devices) are a different topic and probably should be assigned to the militia units, under the jurisdiction of the local county authority, or state level depending on the people. Tanks and fighter jets can be used by a minority to cause chaos in the country and overthrow the legitimate government, unlike pussy shit like 40mm, 50 cal, and some c4. Infantry weapon systems are only “useful” against the state in a mass uprising, which is the requirement for a righteous rebellion against a rogue leadership. Oligarchs/spooks/glowniggers will find it difficult to have only a spec-ops team and attempt to coup a whole country using rifles, MGs, and RPGs.

    And all of this will need to be reconsidered with each technological breakthrough because if mankind survives the (((West))), you know railguns and gauss rifles will be realized. And AI-managed drone swarms, etc. The current impression of weapons in the general public is still stuck at the Vietnam War level. WW1 even.

    This is assuming the people are vigilant and actually participate in local politics. Non-vigilant slobs deserve to lose their “rights”/privileges anyway, as proved by over 100 years of gun control creeping. Also, Christianity and Freedom of Speech will complement the Rights to Arms, and vice versa.

    This is the only “reasonable” take for an armed culture. Anything else you are just gimping yourself. And without God, no amount of guns will ever help, as seen with the boobus amerimuttus.

  220. @mulga mumblebrain

    Yes, and after stealing the richest piece of land on Earth, goes on to stand on a soap box clothed in the whitest robes and casts judgements on everybody else.

    The world is an imperfect place. If Americans recognised their own faults and were not so preachy and pushy about their own “values”, the rest of the world would not be so critical of them.

  221. Democracy is but a way to lull a population into believing that they some influence on their future.

    Why chain up your slave, when you can convince him that is already free to serve you?

    • Agree: Towey
    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  222. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Commentator Mike

    The very wealthy ended up on top under Communism, the same way the end up on top of anything you try to pull. Gregory Clark, Son Also Rises. See also: Chamley-Judd redistribution impossibility theorem.

    practically nothing at all was for sale in the shops of the 1980s Soviet Union, and new electric bulbs, among many other popular consumer items, could not be obtained for love nor money […] people would take the dead lightbulbs from their apartment blocks [or buy them on the black market –VV] and swap them for working bulbs at their place of work.

    https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2017/11/after-all-a-dead-electric-bulb-in-a-peaked-soviet-style-thinking-cap/

    If this is “owning more property” then give me my horrible Capitalistic privation.

  223. Alrenous says: • Website
    @follyofwar

    If more than one person is voting, too many people are voting.

  224. Alrenous says: • Website
    @KDE1711

    There’s nothing wrong with imposing things on people

    Gross.

    I decide it’s good that you give me your wallet. It’s a good thing if you’re poor, see – ref: camels and needles. I’m bravely taking on the burden on your behalf.

    The American Libertarian party is very clearly a Communist party with a slightly different breed of mental virus. When you use it to smear Capitalist ideas you’re just upholding Communism.
    And I just want to help by letting you experience Communism first hand.

  225. @littlereddot

    Yes, house-niggering is far more effective than putting slaves on chains!

    The white masters can even count on their house-niggers to defend them on the web, or get out onto the streets to cause havoc on the white masters’ behalf– as those in Hong Kong did! ;-D

  226. @mulga mumblebrain

    Watch this BBC video where their “operatives” investigate Chinese exploiting kids in Africa to make racist videos about “low IQ” Africans

    Malawi goment probe ‘Racism for Sale’ documentary

    https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/articles/cxxwwgp0dp8o

    Looks like the BBC is mobilising blacks against the Chinese in Africa. They don’t seem to make such exposes about their own charities exploiting African poverty and whatever other misdeeds but it’s open season on the Chinese. Have fun watching this.

  227. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Commentator Mike

    Oh that’s clever.

    Step 0: Make “low IQ” videos.
    Step 1: Sell the videos to dissidents.
    Step 2: Sell videos or other evidence of the buyers to anti-racists.

    Why get paid by only one set of gullible idiots when you can get paid by the idiot’s moronic sworn enemies too?

    P.S. But,
    >BBC

    Try to get a source that’s more reliable than dowsing rods.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  228. Anon[283] • Disclaimer says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    of course there’s overpopulation!

  229. @Alrenous

    Hey, I was being half ironic. The BBC are no better, it’s just that whatever they do is “official”.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  230. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Commentator Mike

    I see. Fair enough. Sorry for missing it.

  231. Malla says:
    @Priss Factor

    Whites want to be giant Jesus Christ to the non White Jews. But the real story will be different from the story in the Bible. If Whites sacrifice themselves, the non Whites will not become “Christian”, they will remain “Jewish” and do Jewy things to each other till the end of time. The only exception might be the Japanese.

  232. @Commentator Mike

    Thanks for this info.

    One thing I notice about it. In such a documentary, the BBC is obviously not trying to persuade Africans that China is bad. It is for consumption in the West. What I can interpret from this is, and their other recent media activities, is that Western MSM is no longer on offensive mode, ie. persuading the third world against China and Russia, but is actually on the defensive. It knows that its message is no longer believed in the Global South, and is instead desperately trying to shore up opinion within its own shores that they are on the side of right.

    It is actually a glimmer of hope for me.

  233. A glamorous bi-national event: Samantha (“sex-symbol
    of the 80’s”) marries Norwegian Tour Manager … Linda.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Fox#Personal_life
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10930317/Sam-Fox-Linda-Olsen-MARRIED-Singer-arrives-ceremony-umbrellas-Essex.html
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10931825/Inside-Sam-Fox-Linda-Olsens-lavish-five-star-wedding-couple-exchange-vows-Essex.html

    In the case of gang rapes of its own youth by introduced invaders, the Italian justice system is very lenient, even “tolerant”. The situation is quite different, however, with wealthy foreign directors who are accused of “sexual assault” by some random woman in need of money. https://www.freepressjournal.in/hollywood/oscar-winning-filmmaker-paul-haggis-69-arrested-in-italy-on-sexual-assault-charges

  234. @RoatanBill

    Religion is the gateway drug that leads to state worship.

    Isn’t that literally what militantly atheistic communism is at its core?

    I love to remind people that atheists murdered more people in a hundred year period than all the Inquisition and the Crusades combined. Atheism is, after all, the cornerstone of communism. There is nothing more dangerous than an atheist with political power.

    • Agree: Towey
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  235. @mulga mumblebrain

    You seem to have a bit of confusion with the definition of steal. I think the word you meant to use was conquor.

  236. @Swaytonious

    Atheism is the realization that all religion is rubbish. Anarchism is the realization that all gov’t is rubbish. I’m both.

    That some gov’t pushed atheism was just their way of eliminating the competition. Religion and gov’t are very closely related as the dolts that believe in religious nonsense are prepared to believe in state nonsense because they never developed critical thinking abilities.

    Religion is pounded into their minds from an early age and it is usually just accepted by the shallow thinkers without question. The ideology of being subservient to some sky god prepares them to think that being put upon their entire lives by a criminal gang called gov’t is just fine.

    Your hyperbole concerning atheists murdering people is outright bullshit. You know as well as I that gov’t does the murdering. In the US’s case, good christians have murdered millions in this century alone, but I wouldn’t say it was their religion that did the crimes but their devotion to the gang they decided to become a member of.

    • Replies: @Swaytonious
  237. Dchjk says:
    @Alrenous

    The only reason National Socialists were called fascists is that they allied with Italy (after their Anschluss in Austria, deposing the Fascist regime in place there, nearly provoking a war with Mussolini).

    Academics need taxonomy and classifiable categories, the tools of their trade, and warmongering politicians need Us vs. Them. The term “Fascism” is even more nebulous than “democracy”, but it serves purposes.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  238. @Alrenous

    The Empire lasted until 1453 when the Turks conquored Constantinople.

    • Troll: Alrenous
  239. @Johan

    I think you miss the fact that Nazism was designed to counter and repair the physical and spiritual damage done to the German People by the Jews in Weimer and before. Further, monarchy is the usual mode for Europeans. Hitler and Nazi leaders remembered the German Emperors.. isn’t autocracy another way of saying totalitarian?

  240. @RoatanBill

    Funny.. it wasn’t pounded into my head. I’m the only one in my family that is religious.

    I think your argument about atheists not being responsible for the murder of atheist communism would carry more weight if they didn’t go out of their way to blow up churches and murder clergy. Militant atheism was a core aspect of the communist motivation. The Soviet Union was an atheist state with no (God created) moral limits. It is this exact thing that makes them so dangerous. We’re all just clumps of cells.. like the way atheists look at an unborn humanbeing.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  241. @Swaytonious

    Religion is a direct competitor to government. Religion and gov’t each want the minds of their constituents. Religion and gov’t are two sides of the same coin. They support each other for the most part with bullshit like ‘give to caesar …’, and is why religions pay no taxes. It’s a mutual respect between thieves and criminals.

    Any dictatorial gov’t always wants to get rid of their competition. Churches have been known to preach to their mind numbed dolts to either go along with the gov’t or to go against it. When the religion isn’t lined up with gov’t objectives, they are a political organization the gov’t needs to subdue. Blowing them up is a cheap way of closing off the headquarters.

    Why not tell me about the good christian murderers that infest the US military and have murdered an estimated 20 million people in just the current century. Using your logic, its christians that murder; can’t you see that?

    I don’t ascribe the murder of other peoples to the religion of the morons that carry a weapon for gov’t and wear their costumes. Islam is the exception. I ascribe the murders to people that have the mental disorders of nationalism and patriotism to cheer the death and destruction some asshole that heads every gov’t initiates.

    Read this : https://warprayer.org/

    Ponder this :

    [MORE]

    Throne and altar were twins–two vultures from the same egg.
    To attack the king was treason; to dispute the priest, blasphemy.
    The sword and cross were allies.
    Together they attacked the rights of men; they defended each other.
    The king owned the bodies of men, the priests the souls.
    One lived on taxes collected by force, the other on alms collected by fear.
    Both robbers, both beggars.
    The king made laws, the priest made creeds.
    With bowed backs the people carried the burdens of one, with open-mouthed wonder received the dogmas of the other.
    The king said rags and hovels for you, robes and palaces for me.
    The priest said God made you ignorant and immoral; He made me holy and wise; you are the sheep, I am the shepherd; your fleeces belong to me.
    You must not reason, you must not contradict, you must believe.
    Robert G. Ingersoll

    • Replies: @geokat62
  242. geokat62 says:
    @RoatanBill

    I ascribe the murders to people that have the mental disorders of nationalism and patriotism…

    Nationalism and patriotism are mental disorders?

    If fighting to DEFEND your homeland is considered a mental disorder, then I’m afraid to ask what sanity looks like to you.

    I suspect it resembles something like the world having no borders, our homelands turned into shopping malls, in which a mishmash of people from every corner of the world live next to each other, despite the fact they have no common language, religion or ethnic heritage (see present-day Londonistan,* the stabbing capital of the world).

    This is exactly the dystopian vision of the future our Jewish Supremacist masters have in store for us. I and most nationalists are prepared to do everything in our power to prevent its implementation. I guess you and other libertarians and/or anarchists are prepared to do everything in your power to bring it to fruition.

    I’m certain that Jewish Supremacists gladly welcome your assistance in helping them usher in a world in which they feel “more comfortable.”

    *excerpt from Roche Motel Revisited: The Comfort of an Atomized Society:

    Friday rush hour. Euston station [in London]. Who’s here? Who isn’t. A kaleidoscope of skin colours. The world in one terminus. Barbara Roche can see it over the rim of her cup of Americano coffee. “I love the diversity of London,” she tells me. “I just feel comfortable.”

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/03/11/roche-motel-revisited-the-comfort-of-an-atomized-society/

    • Replies: @Alrenous
    , @RoatanBill
  243. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Dchjk

    Fascism is the manifestation of the politics of narcissism. It’s an egalitarianism theocracy.

    All Fascist states share six diagnostic features:
    1. Dogmatism and xenophobia.
    2. Utopianism and rejection of wu wei.
    3. Obsession with the Plot of a State Enemy.
    4. Monogenderism.
    5. Newspeak.
    6. Unprincipled exceptions to the demotic formula.

    A “national” Fascism runs the xenophobia along national lines. An “international” Fascism runs it straight along the dogmatic religious lines. They treat the border in exactly the same narcissistic way, notwithstanding the differences in their taste in placement.

    You can also call it Satanism. Devout Satanists always agitate for Fascism.

    Democracy is logically impossible; attempts to produce democracy result in Fascism and are intended to.
    Communism always results in the immiseration of everyone but especially the immiseration of the workers and peasants; the upper classes end up far more distinct. In other words, it produces Fascism and is intended to.
    Socialism is just Communism with a different coat of paint. The true OG Fascists were the Sophists, except lies have a shelf life; they keep ruining the reputation of whatever they choose to call themselves and have to pick a new euphemism, like [socialist].

    The Owenites found that even illiterate peasants don’t think Communism works on paper if you give it to them straight. Hence all their descendants learned to lean into the Sophism and straight lie about it.

    Fun fact, after Athens and Rome, the reputation of democracy was shit until the 1600s.

    And yet, the fundamental theorem of history is that history repeats. It merely gets faster with practice.

  244. Alrenous says: • Website
    @geokat62

    Nationalism is a scam.

    Every state in the last 10,000 years has been built on a lie. The term is political formula.

    Polisci 101 term: stationary bandit. Bandits are criminals; the ruling class is parasitic. Nationalism is the idea that if the ruling class is the same colour as you are, they’re not parasites. Nationalism, like all political formulae, is the idea that bandits aren’t bandits due to [special pleading].

    Defend your home? Sure. The closest, most violent, and most dangerous enemy of your home is anyone pushing nationalism.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  245. @geokat62

    Don’t speak for me. Speak only for yourself.

    If fighting to DEFEND your homeland is considered a mental disorder

    When in your lifetime has the US engaged in defense of the US? Every single military adventure, including WW-II has been an offensive mission, a mission of choice. Nationalism is an excuse for murdering foreigners for absolutely no reason. It give the morons that join the military a lie they can use to turn off their conscience. It’s the good christians that largely populate the US military that have murdered 20 million people in the current century alone. The amoral swine that join the US military should be brought up on war crimes charges and hung along with the entire political class.

    Nationalism in actual practice is not love of homeland and protecting it from foreign invaders. Nationalism is state worship and the idiocy of blindly following orders to enrich the bankers while murdering foreign populations and stealing their resources. Nationalism is the worship of the state religion and has nothing to do with defending family and tradition. It is defining a new tradition of blatant murder so far without consequences.

    I hope that the US faces war crimes trials for all the human shit that participated in Vietnam and all following conflicts that were wars of choice for profit. As the days of US hegemony come to a close, the nations that have been the target of US aggression should seek justice.

    It’s nationalist morons that have been in control of the US for decades and it is those morons that have produced the current conditions. Look in the mirror to see an example of the culprits that have ruined the country.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  246. geokat62 says:
    @RoatanBill

    Don’t speak for me. Speak only for yourself…

    Look in the mirror to see an example of the culprits that have ruined the country.

    All I can say to my libertarian/anarchist friends is “careful what you wish for.”

    Disparate peoples have waged battles for centuries to establish their hard-fought-for homelands. The fact that they’ve been subverted by Zionist Occupied Governments should not motivate us to turn our backs on them. We (our children and grandchildren) will rue the day, if we do.

    Here’s a challenge I’ll throw out to my libertarian/anarchist friends… if you can convince Jewish supremacists to turn their backs on their Jewish homeland, we goys would be willing to do the same.

    Good luck with that!

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  247. geokat62 says:
    @Alrenous

    Nationalism is a scam.

    See my response to RB.

  248. @geokat62

    You can’t counter a single thing I stated because it’s all too true.

    Again, speak for yourself. What I wish for is the end of the murder of innocent people by trained murderers in costume, regardless of country. I wish for the end of the force, coercion and violence that gov’t represents. I wish for the average person to start to think for himself and tell the controllers to fuck off.

    The fact that they’ve been subverted by Zionist Occupied Governments should not motivate us to turn our backs on them.

    It is you and your mentality that provides the motive power for the scum in gov’t, be it zionist, christian, black, white or purple. Stop cooperating with the shit in the political class and instead throw sand into the gears of war and aggression. By claiming to be a nationalist, you are giving moral support for the very zionists and other assorted scum you claim to detest.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  249. geokat62 says:
    @RoatanBill

    It is you and your mentality that provides the motive power for the scum in gov’t…

    Do you not make a distinction between a “homeland” and a “government”? Or are they one and the same?

    Do the Chinese and Russian people view their governments favourably or unfavourably? My sense is the overwhelming majority of Chinese or Russians view their respective governments very favourably. Why is that? I know I’m going out on a limb here, but I think it’s because they have not become Zionist Occupied. Their leaders and governments are striving to pursue policies that are in the best interests of the majority of the people.

    The same would be true in the West. If our societies hadn’t been subverted and our governments Zionist Occupied, they’d still be doing their best trying to implement the will of the majority of the people (like China and Russia), rather than doing the bidding of their Jewish supremacist masters, for the privilege of feeding at the shekel trough. .

    If we can end ZOG rule, we can restore our homelands to the imperfect entities they were before they became Zionist Occupied.

    Ethno-nationalists realise that this is the best we can achieve in an imperfect world and that every other “solution” is inferior.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  250. Do you not make a distinction between a “homeland” and a “government”?

    They are the same in the case of the US. A homeland is where there’s a homogeneity among the residents. The US is now a toilet of competing interests, different religions, different races, different cultures, different languages, different peoples. It was tolerable in the 60’s but got progressively worse thereafter.

    Do the Chinese and Russian people view their governments favourably or unfavourably?

    The Chinese are majority homogeneous as are the Russians. They are not a conglomerate of mutts. They have a chance at being satisfied with their gov’ts because they aren’t trying to satisfy but one kind of constituent.

    You keep coming back to the zionist occupied mantra. It may be true that today, the jews run US policy and most of the major corporations, but that occurred with the full cooperation of the once christian white nation due to allowing essentially unhindered immigration to every dirtbag in the world. Look at the congress, mostly white christians. Who have the presidents been? Mostly white christians. Your kind has sold you out and 150,000,000 adults voted to keep that system alive. The zionists won because the majority christians are stupid. If it wasn’t going to be jews it would have been some other clique because the system is purposely designed to produce corruption. Democracy has to be the stupidest approach to gov’t possible.

    A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising them the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal responsibility, always followed by a dictatorship. The average of the world’s great civilizations before they decline has been 200 years. These nations have progressed in this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependency; from dependency back again to bondage.
    Alexander Tyler

    If we can end ZOG rule

    You can’t end jew rule because you keep voting for it. You are your own worst enemy by waving the flag and voting for your annihilation. There isn’t a single politician that can possibly get up on stage and say plainly that all the illegals need to be thrown out along with their anchor babies. All the muslim mosques should be bulldozed and their adherents deported to somewhere, anywhere where their stupidity is the norm. All violent criminals get executed on their first offense. etc.

    Till the white european stock decides that they’ve had enough of bullshit law and order, that it’s time for vigilante justice, there is no possibility of rehabilitating the US. Your ethno-nationalism is pissing into the wind.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  251. Alrenous says: • Website
    @geokat62

    My sense is the overwhelming majority of Chinese or Russians view their respective governments very favourably. Why is that?

    Because they’re gullible and short-sighted.

    Even if da joo is the problem, nationalism already failed. It’s impotent.

    Ethno-nationalism is the idea that if your leaders are the same colour as you, they are immune to economic incentives. Utopianism.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  252. geokat62 says:
    @RoatanBill

    They are the same in the case of the US. A homeland is where there’s a homogeneity among the residents. The US is now a toilet of competing interests, different religions, different races, different cultures, different languages, different peoples. It was tolerable in the 60’s but got progressively worse thereafter.

    I see. So, the Jewish Supremacist Organizations have achieved their overarching goal with the passage of Hart-Celler in 1965? There are some who think America will inevitably undergo a process of Balkanization in which the country will be fragmented into several disparate pieces… e.g., a black one, a Hispanic one, a blended one, and a white one.

    Till the white european stock decides that they’ve had enough… Your ethno-nationalism is pissing into the wind.

    If there will indeed be a process of Balkanization, would we still be pissing in the wind?

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  253. geokat62 says:
    @Alrenous

    Even if da joo is the problem, nationalism already failed. It’s impotent.

    Tell that to da joos.

    Ethno-nationalism is the idea that if your leaders are the same colour as you, they are immune to economic incentives. Utopianism

    Utopianism? And what “ism” do you prefer?

  254. @geokat62

    I’ve been a proponent of terminating the Fed Gov for decades. The states should have long ago stepped up to their responsibility to reign in the completely out of control death machine that the US became with war after war, out of control spending and the inevitable blowback that would result. The states did nothing. The original crime was committed in 1913 when the central bank was authorized.

    When through the process of law the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world. By dividing the voter through the political party system we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance. It is thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished.
    US Banker’s Association Magazine – 1924

    The Fed Gov long ago became a detrimental force with an agenda of its own completely disconnected from any sane vision to benefit the population. As far as I’m concerned, it was the US military and their partner letter agencies that effectively took over the US when they whacked JFK. They partnered with the finance types to purposely strip mine the country by sending industry overseas and dumbing down the population so that it produced fewer and fewer thinkers (scientists and engineers) and an over abundance of bullshit artists (the entirety of the humanities and social sciences).

    DOD never passing an audit but more and more funding for more and more shitty weapons system and congress not interested in \$21 Trillion worth of accounting irregularities tells me that the military and intel agency leadership IS the deep state and elections have been theater for decades. The aim was to steal as much as possible for as long as possible and then walk away from the carcass. The end is in sight.

    What the “west” is experiencing is the culmination of decades of financial manipulation made possible because of the US’s reserve currency scam that has reached its limits. What follows will terminate the US’s hegemon status, it’s reserve currency status and produce a depression that will last years. The countries that comprise the “west” will feel the most serious repercussions. The rest of the world won’t be spared due to the US system of currency magic and bogus financial instruments having infected avery other nation.

    What comes out the other end of the depression is up for grabs. I doubt there will be an entity called the USA. I expect the governors or other actors to see this as their opportunity to become Caesar in their area. All the military weaponry will probably get used to realign borders with the US population in the same shape as the innocent Ukrainians now. Several countries will probably emerge to replace the 50 states.

    • Replies: @Ralph B. Seymour
  255. @RoatanBill

    Bring on the “greater” depression.

    That hard reality might provide what’s needed to get out from under this jewish dictatorship.

    • Agree: Towey
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  256. @Ralph B. Seymour

    The sooner the better since waiting just allows for more people to go deeper into a hole; more homeless, more foreclosed upon, more unemployed, etc.

  257. For all his limited (sometimes creditable) merits, I stifle my gag reflex at Tuck Carlson’s nightly invocations of “democracy” as the alleged founding American principle being routinely ignored or violated by our American governments. Democracy is mob rule, pure and simple: i.e. two wolves and one sheep ordering from the lunch menu.

  258. @Commentator Mike

    I’d love to see a Kalibr hit BBC HQ, but I fear most of the cockroaches would be overseas, spreading lies and hatred. Spare the BBC Gardening Show, however.

  259. Hitmarck says:

    @ Andrew Anglin

    I’ll help you out with my German brain.

    “the logical thing to do would be to split the country”

    You’re kinda new to the Jesus is the way thing I assume.
    Would an atheistic Andrew chose another half than later the religious one would?
    What about women? We know they are sexy retard children which first adopt a media- and peer pressure opinion and later, if their lifes are not totally derailed by jews, have a slightly more moderate version of their husbands opinions.

    I see a lot of reasons for (granted, inter white) border hoppellings happening.

    Democracy is a (very) limited use case of a decision finding process. One that’s femoidic as fuck and in normal life we gladly, at least as males, rarely encounter it.
    Mostly because it is intrinsicly inhumane, because it limits our male godly spark to create.

    After endless Vulva Pottery, a rape fiction topling the bible as most distributed book and endless vagina monologues I say it can be concluded that women dont have that spark, the closest they can get is being white and birthing white sons.

  260. Sarah says:

    Spooks are useful and necessary abstract concepts needed to structure a human social order. Even the most primitive African tribes have spooks, which is how the Catholic Church ultimately decided that they were human beings with souls and not animals (it was a hot topic of debate

    The Catholic Church was right to ask the question; not because they were Catholic but because there is reason to ask the question. Human or not, n……s are not even different races from white European Caucasians or Asians but a different species.

  261. Sarah says:

    The ability to rationally build abstract thought forms outside of the concrete world is what separates humans from animals and what it means when the Bible says that “man is made in the image of God.” Spooks are a framework through which to shape and improve physical reality.

    Do we have proof of this? To my knowledge, no. Who proves that some animals (chimps, gorillas and even cats or dogs) cannot develop abstract concepts? If they could talk, we might have some surprises.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  262. @Sarah

    And many upright, uptight, upstart hominids have no idea how to form rational thought.

    • LOL: Sarah
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2