The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
Mr. Bean Speaks Out About Restrictions on Speech
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

And now… Mr. Bean.

(It’s been a slow news cycle, folks. But just wait. I can make this into something.)

Metro:

Rowan Atkinson has had his say on cancel culture and the effect it can have on comedy, believing you should be allowed to make jokes about ‘absolutely anything’.

Many comedians over recent years have come under fire for their material being too near the knuckle, but Rowan doesn’t believe anything should be off-limits to be politically correct.

Rowan has previously rallied against cancel culture and even campaigned for a modification to the UK’s Religious Hatred Bill in the mid-naughties to allow performers are leeway to criticise religion within their act, as well as to have the notion of ‘insult’ removed from the UK’s Public Order Bill.

He told the Irish Times: ‘It does seem to me that the job of comedy is to offend, or have the potential to offend, and it cannot be drained of that potential.

‘Every joke has a victim. That’s the definition of a joke. Someone or something or an idea is made to look ridiculous.’

The Mr Bean star also hit back at the suggestion that comedy should exclusively punch up at those in power and never down at those who are more defenceless.

He explained: ‘I think you’ve got to be very, very careful about saying what you’re allowed to make jokes about. You’ve always got to kick up? Really?

‘What if there’s someone extremely smug, arrogant, aggressive, self-satisfied, who happens to be below in society? They’re not all in houses of parliament or in monarchies.

‘There are lots of extremely smug and self-satisfied people in what would be deemed lower down in society, who also deserve to be pulled up. In a proper free society, you should be allowed to make jokes about absolutely anything.’

This is all just very obviously true.

But it’s also true that the people you’re not supposed to punch down at are not really “down.”

Jews, for example – who are the number one people you’re not allowed to joke about – are admittedly the richest and most powerful people on earth. They won’t even deny that outright – if you point it out, they’ll just start talking about how they’re better and smarter than you, and you’re just jealous.

Gays are also not doing too bad – they are also very rich and powerful and have some of the most powerful lobbying groups in the Western world, second only to the Jews. Or women. I don’t know if the gay or women’s lobby is bigger – per capita the gay lobby is obviously much bigger, but the women’s lobby might be technically bigger.

Black people are legitimately down in their station in life – though it’s pretty much entirely their own fault.

And even while I’m not going to try to claim that blacks are powerful or live good lives, in terms of their social status, they are effectively worshiped as gods, with the most powerful people in the world explaining away all their bad behavior.

Meanwhile, the reverse is true – Jews, the most powerful group, are allowed to make fun of poor whites, who are only doing slightly better than blacks because they don’t compulsively kill each other for no reason.

Remember that Jew “comedian” who was doing a joke about how people at Charlottesville are stupid for chanting “Jews will not replace us” and he said that Jews are rich and don’t want your poor people jobs? Then someone in the audience yelled “TV” (as in “we don’t want you using nepotism to replace us in our jobs in the media”), and he started whining about how he was the victim? Then the entire media spammed the clip talking about how victimized Jews are?

The entire thing of “you should punch up, not down” is the joke. No one ever gets attacked for punching down. Well, I mean, if someone was like “have you seen these niggers on crack shooting each other? What is the deal with crackhead niggers shooting each other? They say ‘don’t call me a nigger,’ and it’s like, ‘nigger, I only called you a nigger because you act like a complete nigger,’” that could arguably apply to what Atkinson is talking about. But that’s a rare example, and not really something any white person would have said on a comedy stage since like, the 1970s anyway.

Comedians are currently being attacked for attacking the powerful or those who are deemed by the powerful to be protected classes.

I started this website as more or less a comedy project for edgy teenagers. You see what happened to me. A more somber and perhaps darker tone was struck when I saw what these people will do to you for making fun of them. Then, I decided on genocide.

Haha, just joking. See? Not allowed to make that joke. Can’t say “the Holocaust didn’t happen – but it should have!”

But that’s the bigger issue here: you can’t restrict comedy without restricting all speech. Atkinson campaigned for having a caveat in the “hate” bill for comedy, but comedy is the biggest threat in the first place.

No one is afraid of this:

They’re afraid of this:

Here’s the thing: people have to be allowed to say whatever they want, without really any restrictions. The restrictions there should be on speech have already gone through the courts in America with regard to the First Amendment – obscenity is not speech (if it has no artistic value and exists purely to titillate), you’re not allowed to threaten someone specifically in an imminent manner, and… well, that’s pretty much it.

It’s not actually illegal to yell “fire” in a crowded theatre. If it were, then black people who talk all the way through movies (loudly) would constantly be arrested for yelling “damn, nigga, that shit is fire, dawg!”

If you actually yelled “fire” in a crowded theatre, you could get charged with inducing a panic, but that’s not really a speech issue, and is not federal law. There is no “theatre fire yelling exemption” to the First Amendment. No one has ever shouted fire in a crowded theatre and then taken the case to the Supreme Court, because this is a ridiculous analogy designed to classify any speech that the establishment considers incendiary as criminal. The internet is not a crowded theatre, and anyone can click off of your post or turn their computer off if whatever you wrote is causing them to panic.

Everyone fundamentally understands all of this, aside from stupid people who are manipulated by the media using childlike appeals to emotionality. It would have been nice if more celebrity artists would have spoken out against these restrictions on speech when they were coming into place. For whatever reason, the people speaking out now seem to mostly be British – along with Atkinson, John Cleese and Ricky Gervais are two that come to mind. Joe Rogan has spoken out in America, but he’s a lot more famous for podcasting than he is for being a comedian – his comedy is not good. (Side note: Joe Rogan is a good example of someone who tried really hard at everything he liked and eventually, at 50-something, really got somewhere. So, chin-up, lad. Just keep at it.)

But they didn’t start with comedy, they started with stuff no one liked. That’s when people should have spoken out – before the idea of censoring “distasteful” speech became solidified. Now, it is just accepted that censorship is okay, so it’s simply a matter of modifying what is considered “distasteful.” We call that “the slippery slope” – something that they still claim is “a fallacy.”

Remember when they told you the legalization of homosexuality wouldn’t lead to gay marriage? And then that the legalization of gay marriage wouldn’t lead to grooming children into homosexuality?

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 71 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. What would Oliver Wendall Holmes, Jr. do with Anglin?

    Holmes gave us the “clear and present danger” exception to the First Amendment in his noxious, notorious, neo-Cohen friendly opinion in Schenk V. U.S.

    • Replies: @awry
  2. I enjoyed the video of the armed black thief on whom the tables were turned. But then, I’m an old white supremacist who writes hate-filled things about Jews and blacks on the Internet, so what would you expect?

    Have the Houston branches of Antifa and BLM staged any Stop the Hate protests yet, or do they already have more eighty-inch TVs and power tools than they can use or resell on eBay? Also, I await the announcement of the jailing of the store owner for unlawful imprisonment of an innocent customer. With an extra five years tacked on for a hate crime offense, the people who locked him in will probably get out of prison around 2050.

    • Replies: @HallParvey
    , @Mike Tre
  3. The actual laws are relegated to a secondary importance in today’s American courts. What matters now under the neo-Bolsheviks is the same thing that mattered in 1918 in Russia: Who? Whom?

    Enemy of the people? Execution!

    White? Enemy of the People!

    • Agree: fnn, Rich
  4. Saw the Jewish comedian clip. He really turned nasty when he heard, “TV”. That’s all; nothing more. “Do you mean Jews control Hollywood? Then leave”. Well, the “hacker” never said that; the comedian puts word into his mouth. Ok, even then, there could be only two possibilities: 1. that statement is true, in which case it is not a joke worth laughing, or 2. that statement is not true, in which case, one can simply laugh it off. What was the need to tell the “hacker” to leave? But then the “hacker” deserves it, if he has paid for hearing this comedian.

    So, he, a Jew, can make fun of Whites of Charlottesville, but not the other way round? Why? Because Hitler killed six million Jews? But then it was the American Whites who fought Hitler! Surely the American Whites have a right to make fun of anyone, if anyone can make fun of them?

    When a whole establishment turns itself to decide what should be laughed at, and what should not be, it is only a matter of time before people start laughing at the establishment.

    • Agree: Angharad, Wokechoke
    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
  5. Rights, desires, necessities:

    Free speech is a right, which means we pretend that everybody automatically deserves it when we really mean that the government giveth when it doesn’t cost them anything and the government taketh away when we’re naughty. Somebody with guns or other coercive power always has to win it or prevent it, because isn’t that what inalienable means?

    Free speech is a desire, which means we want it because we like it, and due to religion and moral nutrition, anything we like has to be bad for us in some way. Therefore anything we like must be alternately doled out and denied by moral authorities. That’s why nobody feels justified in saying “I want x just because” instead of “I deserve x because reasons.”

    Free speech is a basic necessity because when the truth has to be implied and coded (like under every government, religion, or social order ever) only the intelligent and experienced can know truth and express it. And if only thoughtful and responsible people are permitted to express themselves, we’re missing out on all the enrichment that comes from irresponsible idiots.

    Denying free speech is like denying essentials like water or food or heat or electricity, and we’d never do that just because someone disagreed with us or did something that we don’t like (such as, I don’t know, invade the Ukraine or something).

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  6. I don’t know about all of you but CQ will be transitioning soon. I’m going to start identifying as a black/she/he/they, start listening to rap, going to gay pride parades and BLM/Antifas protest and beating up old white people while burn loot Murdering and raping white bitches.
    I figured after all that, I can start saying nigga, wetback, hoe, bla bla bla without being labeled a bigot, racist, white supremacist, domestic terrorist.
    Schitt, I just might like it and stay that way if I can get my own Spotify podcast making \$50 dollaz uh minute.

  7. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Meanwhile, the reverse is true – Jews, the most powerful group, are allowed to make fun of poor whites, who are only doing slightly better than blacks because they don’t compulsively kill each other for no reason.

    The question is, who are the ((Jews))? You’ve got your open, obvious Synagogue and Bolshevik ((Jews)), but then you’ve got your crypto-((Jews)), aka ((Jew))-stooges, aka the Judas Class, aka ((Jew)) partisans.

    Really, anyone who gives succor to ((Jews))/”Israel”/Satan/Organized Sociopaths.

    At this point, that’s the entire US Congress. That’s why most people in the Anglosphere are pretending to believe the narrative on the ((Jew))-instigated war in Ukraine: Oy! Oy! Russians are Nazis! All Whites are Nazis! All Christians are Nazis! Anyone who opposes us is a Nazi!, for example.

    It’s not that people “don’t know the truth.” It’s that they know the truth and are lying or playing dumb, or that they don’t want to know the truth because then they’d either have to do something about the ((Jews)) or admit that they themselves are Satanists.

    Like Paul Craig Roberts writing: “Clearly Zelensky, a Jew who somehow heads a neo-Nazi state, lies when he claims Ukraine had no intention of reconquering the breakaway Donbass republics.”
    https://www.unz.com/proberts/ukraines-future/
    Why is Roberts pretending to be surprised that a ((Jew)) could lead a neo-Nazi state when he knows full well the ((Jews)) collaborated with the Nazis to beget “Israel” and he knows full well the nature and character of Zionist/Judeofascist Israel?

    For ((Christians)), it is particularly difficult to admit they’re Satanists. For ((liberals)) and ((neocons)), not so much. Eventually ((Christians)) will just drop the farce and become ((liberals)) and ((neocons)) and open Satanists.

    For America and the world, there’s one way out of this, and one way only: Give the Satanists the Moses treatment, and be done with it.

    The alternative — the slow, torturous, disintegration into Satanism and then oblivion, ends in the same place anyway: the mass, self-imposed and well-deserved death of Satanists. Just like that Black in the video above, a rat caught in a trap.

    Why put ourselves through that for 30 pieces of temporal silver?

    • Replies: @Anon
  8. Look no further: Michael Kikel Hudson, the great economistyrian on this page does not like my kind of criticism or “negative input” and has banned me and others from commenting his crap spread.

    Eat your hut son!

    The opposite to the Hutson is the Pepe of Escobar: He took a lot below the beltline and had far far more reason to censor, but he does not at all. He just took it in and is even greater now.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
    • LOL: 36 ulster
  9. MarkU says:

    When a whole establishment turns itself to decide what should be laughed at, and what should not be, it is only a matter of time before people start laughing at the establishment.

    Once that would have been true, now I’m not so sure. When you live in an age where parents are OK with having their children sterilised, as in ‘gender reassignment surgery’, how is it possible to believe in the innate sense of humans anymore?

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  10. awry says:
    @Liberty Mike

    He was the one of those who ruled in Buck v. Bell that the forced sterilization of the “feeble minded” is constitutional.

    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
    , @Anon
  11. Now since in Russia a number of media outlets had been banned, such as the Liberal radio Echo of Moscow and their website, the atmosphere has improved.

    Those people were trolling the entire nation under the guise of freedom of speech. Looking for a Pokemon in the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, mocking the Russian culture.

    A small group of people can create a toxic environment. Freedom has to be contained.

    • Replies: @ia
  12. @awry

    Yet, he is heralded as a brilliant and heroic jurist.

  13. kihowi says:

    He’s being a dishonest old man. He doesn’t want absolute joking freedom, he’s just nostalgic for the taboos of his youth. He wants to get back to an age when it was just racist jokes that ruined your life, not all this newfangled and confusing stuff about genders.

    Just look at his “not the nine o’clock news” stuff from the eighties or his theater show. Jokes were about racists, never about blacks.

    • Agree: dimples
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  14. ia says:
    @Here Be Dragon

    Looking for a Pokemon in the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, mocking the Russian culture.

    You gotta have sacred spaces that cannot be violated. This is a universal truth. Probably “safe spaces” is an unintentionally comical attempt to do this very thing by modernists.

  15. @Old Brown Fool

    If that subpar Jew is a comedian then I’m Emperor of Galactic Quadrant Three. I’m sure most Jews are more intelligent than to pay money to listen to this guy. The audience must be mostly Shabbas Goys, performing a ritual act of abasement.

  16. Cowboy says:

    Didn’t Trump start the whole “fake news” trope punching at the Media then the Media and the Tech twats used the trope to punch down on the masses? Now we have a disinformation board. Ya I would say they don’t like being punched.

    Good punching Anglin!

  17. Anonymous[420] • Disclaimer says:

    Black people are legitimately down in their station in life – though it’s pretty much entirely their own fault

    Bullshit. I used to believe that. I also used to believe what I read in popular history books.

    Read EMJ’s Slaughter of Cities. Or see if Ron Unz will allows to borrow his Nation of Islam Historical Research Division books (btw, Here’s a downloadable audio version of one of the NOI books Ron cites

    Blacks were the victims by being proxy warrior pawns during some of the most ruthless social engineering for much of the 20th century.

  18. Anonymous[657] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sollipsist

    As E. Michael Jones points out, Jews push for free speech when they’re not in power. Once they’re in power they push for hate speech laws.

    One of the best known free speech advocates was Alan Dershowitz. Back when the WASPs were still in charge (albeit just barely) back in the 60’s and early 70’s Dershowitz argued for the legalization of vulgarity, pornography, and the whole nine yards. Today he wants to criminalize speech, particularly criticism of Israel.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
  19. Notsofast says:

    the real target, is humor itself and this is why the deepstate has embraced the lgbtqetc, blm and other poc communities, in order to use them as cudgels to intimidate critics of their policy into silence. humor and satire are actually very effective and nonviolent methods of speaking out against tyranny.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  20. @Anonymous

    Blacks were the victims by being proxy warrior pawns during some of the most ruthless social engineering for much of the 20th century.

    Even without such a PLAN, blacks would have been problematic for genetic factors: BAMMAMA or blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. And less intelligent and more impulsive, and bongo-wongo jungle wild.

    While it’s true a certain race can be used as a proxy force, the social impact is nevertheless different. For instance, massive Chinese-Hindu immigration to Canada has led to housing problems for white natives. One could argue the Asians were proxy force of globalism. Still, they haven’t turned cities into something like Detroit or Baltimore.

    Mass immigration has done so much to push whites out of so many parts of NY, which is now a white-minority city. Still, whites have nothing to fear from any race but the blacks.

  21. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Still, whites have nothing to fear from any race but the blacks.

    Blacks are as criminal and degenerate as they’re allowed to be. The ((Jew)) and ((Grifter)) “race” is downright Satanic. And the Satanic establishment is using them as Golem against the last of the civilized folk and Christendom.

    Are Satanists a “race”? I don’t know, but they’re carrying out a genocidal race war against White Christians, then all Christians, then all non-Satanic humanity.

    What the hell are you talking about, “nothing to fear from any race but blacks”?

    I think Satanists are forming a race. I think the Satanic race goes back to even before those reptilian Hebrews that Moses dealt with. Or tried to.

    • Replies: @hardlooker
    , @Alrenous
    , @j3
  22. @Pierre de Craon

    But then, I’m an old white supremacist who writes hate-filled things about Jews and blacks on the Internet, so what would you expect?

    How deplorable.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  23. @MarkU

    Humans, schmumans. I’ve always known myself as a dog. Pretty soon I’m gonna get species reassignment therapy so everyone can recognise me for what I am: Badger Down! Pretty Black Shiba-inu Up!

  24. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    Blacks were the victims by being proxy warrior pawns during some of the most ruthless social engineering for much of the 20th century.

    Were Whites also victims of the “social engineering” of WWI and WW2 designed and instigated by ((Jews))/Sociopaths/Satanists?

    What are you doing to stop these Satanists? What are Blacks doing? Practicing Satanic Voodoo?

    Cry me a river for Satanists and Voodooists.

  25. The powers that be are only scared of free speech because they’re on such shaky ground, they can’t stand any criticism that demonstrates the false premises of the ideas that they push. I admire Rowan Atkinson standing up for freedom for comedians to say whatever they want in Britain. I think I heard that John Cleese did the same thing a while back.

  26. JR Foley says:

    American Model appears to be either broken or psychotic —do not export.

  27. anon[428] • Disclaimer says:

    What do North Korean entertainers think? That’s much more important.

    Britain is a pathetic little satellite state that plays with Trident rubber duckies but can’t shoot the nukes off unless they ask CIA pretty please. Their military’s shit, bumboys rubbing up against each other in homoerotic sissy play. The fucking cowards are good at torturing helpless prisoners,

    https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2017/3289.html

    especially Assange, who they torture extra hard to suck CIA dick. They don’t mind sucking CIA dick because they’re used to crawling for their drunk syphilitic Queen and their corpsefucking Knight Bachelor and their kiddyfucking prince. Their major contribution to the balance of power is the Queen’s pendulous labia so Sefcovic is gonna fuck em like a twelve-year-old on Jim’ll Fix It and then they’ll disappear up Langley’s asshole as East Puerto Rico. DoD’ll make the islet a DU munition target range to replace Vieques and Brits will go extinct in mutant sodomy for ever more.

    So nobody gives a shit what Mister Bean thinks. Little cunt’s not even funny. Wake me up when somebody who knows their ass from their elbow weighs in. Somebody with the minimal intellect and habits of mind to test their mental masturbation against irrevocable free expression rights with the most authoritative guidance.

    https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/GC34.pdf

    • Replies: @Lurker
  28. @Anonymous

    Probably worth repeating:

    • Agree: Sollipsist, neutral
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  29. @Anonymous

    Nonsense. Low IQ, lack of impulse control and other genetic factors all work together to explain the state of blacks.

    Have a look at black history, not just in the U.S., but in South Africa since the end of apartheid, or in Zimbabwe under Mugabe.

    Blacks in America are the luckiest of their race. As Muhammad Ali said after the George Foreman fight in Kinshasa, “Thank God my granddaddy got on that boat!”.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  30. @ia

    You gotta have sacred spaces that cannot be violated. This is a universal truth.

    Indeed you must, and indeed it is.

    Probably “safe spaces” is an unintentionally comical attempt to do this very thing by modernists.

    I agree that “safe spaces” are modeled on “sacred spaces,” but, with respect, I am quite certain that the (((modernist))) modeling is intentional rather than unintentional and openly sacrilegious rather than comical.

    • Agree: Passing By
  31. Rowan Atkinson on the need for Free Speech:

    The clip below from the 80’s comedy show ‘Not the Nine o’clock News’ in which Atkinson appeared, features a sketch revealing why many criminals are never apprehended or cases not investigated – this is applicable to the U.S and elsewhere (watch the first 4 mins) :

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  32. “Look at the way they look at each other. It’s like something out of Der Sturmer.” https://stormer-daily.rw/jew-attorney-general-pops-up-in-keev-to-declare-loyalty-to-jew-zelensky/

    (Important: Stürmer has nothing to do with Stormer!)



    Video Link

  33. Wokechoke says:
    @kihowi

    I tend to agree. Not the Nine O’Clock was funny, at the time.

    But he is just pining-ing for the 1980s and those passed mores.

    would he ever crack a Jewish joke about Hollywood or the press or political donors? not a fucking chance.

  34. Wokechoke says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Strangling the Darkie … parking the breakfast.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    , @Lurker
  35. Wokechoke says:
    @Notsofast

    A good joke breaks the fake tension. However it’s also a punch in the gut or a poke in the eye so it is a form of power.

  36. “Well, I mean, if someone was like “have you seen these niggers on crack shooting each other? What is the deal with crackhead niggers shooting each other? They say ‘don’t call me a nigger,’ and it’s like, ‘nigger, I only called you a nigger because you act like a complete nigger,’””

    I read that in Dave Chapelle’s voice.

  37. @Wokechoke

    To get what was being said in the second skit (that went from around 4:00 to 8:00), you need a grasp of Cockney rhyming slang.

    In rhyming slang, they use a word or phrase that rhymes with the actual word to be said.
    Example: When the first guy says: ‘I’ve bounced a few Gregory’s’, Gregory’s is short for saying ‘Gregory Pecks’.

    And ‘Gregory Pecks’ rhymes with CHEQUES.

    In other words, he’s saying: ‘I’ve bounced a few cheques’ in my day – implying he hasn’t always been a model citizen.

    He also says: ‘This is Hans Christian’ – referencing Hans Christian Andersen, the writer of fairy tales. In other words, he’s implying that the others have concocted a fairy tale to implicate him.

    Later on the fat copper said: ‘I was in the jam jar and I gets a bell’.

    ‘Jam jar’ rhymes with ‘car’.
    In other words, he was saying: ‘I was in my car and I got a call’.

    If you’re an American woman who’s visiting the U.K, and wearing a top that shows a bit of cleavage, don’t be surprised if one of the locals greets you with:
    ‘Hello Madam – it’s great that you’re showing some ‘threepenny-bit’.

    (‘Threepenny-bit rhymes with tit).

    Can’t say I’m familiar with all the phrases of British rhyming slang but you can check out a small sampling here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhyming_slang

    I’m in Australia, and although there’s some overlap with the Cockney version, we have our own vocabulary.
    One Aussie will often greet another with: ‘G’Day China’.
    ‘China’ is short for ‘China plate’, which rhymes with ‘mate’.
    It’s another way of saying ‘G’Day mate’.

    You may hear some old timers in Australia (not know for being p.c at the best of times), who lived through the White Australia Policy (Asian immigration into Australia was not allowed until the ban was rescinded in the 1960’s), say something like:
    ‘I don’t like that part of town. It has too many ‘ping-pongs’.
    (ping-pongs rhymes with Ching-Chongs, so you get my drift).

    Be sure to brush up on it before you visit downunder.

  38. Anon[372] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Moore

    Chris, what’s up with the double parentheses? We know that triple parentheses means “Jew,” but why does practically everyone else mentioned by you get double parentheses? Are you retarded, like those Boomers who capitalize every other noun, or are you trolling, or are you actually inventing a new punctuation system which you are teaching the world?

  39. Anon[292] • Disclaimer says:
    @awry

    So he did one good thing, and had one good line. (“Three generations of morons are enough.”) So what?

    • Replies: @awry
  40. RestiveUs says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Seems to me that the term ‘ping-pongs’ would more likely allude to the Chinese prowess at table tennis.

  41. @ia

    You gotta have sacred spaces that cannot be violated.

    That’s a good idea, a good way to put it.

    But look – is it good that pornography is available everywhere, one click away from any child, from any adult, with that unhealthy and perverted sex? Perhaps it would be better if it was restricted – no access for children, subscription for adults.

    And what about the Darknet and rape videos, torture videos, bestiality videos and all that – should it be available for freaks, so they can share it with each other and with all those who are curious, because it’s freedom of expression, or whatever?

    Freedom cannot and should not be absolute, it doesn’t make sense. Sometimes we have to prefer discipline to freedom.

  42. Petermx says:

    I took ten minutes to look a little into the Jewish comedians claim that Jews don’t have extraordinary influence in Canadian media. I don’t intend on researching it further right now but I wanted to look into the obnoxious Jew’s claim so I did a search on Shaw in relation to media. It has different branches, including for television. Shaw was the family name of the founder of the original company in the 1960’s. I have no idea whether they were Jewish or not.

    The mass media company Disney wasn’t founded by Jews but they have dominated it for many years now and changed the images in its movies from family friendly to having princesses with increased bust sizes. CNN was founded by the Christian Ted Turner but Jews have had huge power in CNN for at least a decade and its former president Jeff Zucker fired Rick Sanchez, a host of one of CNN’s shows about 10 years ago when Sanchez suggested Jews have huge power in American media. When I searched Shaw Media it brought me to the television division of Shaw so apparently they own newspapers and / or other media also. At the top of its Wikipedia page it discusses its history and mentions one name, the only name mentioned in the article. It says “In 1974, a group led by Israel Asper bought the assets of Pembina, North Dakota television station KCND-TV….”. Israel Asper’s Wikipedia page says ‘Israel Harold “Izzy” Asper OC OM QC (August 11, 1932– October 7, 2003) was a Canadian tax lawyer and media magnate……Israel Asper was born on August 11, 1932, to a Jewish family’.

    The definition of the word “magnate” I found is “a person of rank, power, influence, or distinction often in a specified area”. How many media magnates does the obnoxious Jewish comedian think Canada has? The first one I found was Jewish.

  43. Lurker says:
    @anon

    Wake me up when somebody who knows their ass from their elbow weighs in

    I say old chap, I think you’ll find that’s their arse from their elbow.

  44. Mike Tre says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    This is the funniest negro breaking into a liquor store footage I have ever seen.

    Pretty much wraps up the negro’s entire existence in 3 minutes.

  45. @Chris Moore

    “I think Satanists are forming a race.”

    Quite possibly. A literal interpretation of the words chosen by Jesus of Nazareth to condemn the Pharisees and scribes (rabbis) would seem to identify a novel lineage described in stark terms as comprising enemies of God; the devil was not just inspirational, but their very “father”.

    I would imagine that exchanging God for the devil as one’s spiritual father is no mean undertaking. It must surely involve extensive, informed, and voluntary disavowals of one’s divine heritage as preparation for adopting sinister new oaths and covenants.

    • Agree: Chris Moore
  46. Wokechoke says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    I know what they are referring to and parodying. Strangling the Darkie, is one of the classics.

    It’s a sketch from another age though. Same streets are run by nigs and pakis now.

  47. Wokechoke says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    The other part of the sketch is the Cornish slang use by Gryff Rhys-Jones. West Country Boys…

    The layers of translation between the Metropol and the Village.

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
  48. frankie p says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    The best Cockney slang is “the trouble and strife”, which of course means “the wife”.

    The “dog and bone” was the “phone” I recall.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  49. @beavertales

    Note that they always go after people who can’t fight back.

    • Replies: @beavertales
  50. @Passing By

    This is the direct result of the abolishment of free speech.

    Canada and Britain are unlike the U.S., in that there are no 1A constitutional protections. If the government passes speech laws against insults, mockery, satire, and someone’s definition of ‘hate’, people like A. Anglin and most of the dissident conservatives in America will be facing charges for ‘hate speech’. After that they’ll go after people of no status.

    Jews will police speech with a vengeance, because their religion commands them to destroy ‘Amalek’ (the enemies of the Israelites). It’s a sacred duty to them.

    Some may think it can’t happen here, but the 1A is already being eroded by states who are making it a crime to criticize Israel or Jews in general.

  51. Libel and slander laws should not exist. Death threats should be legal. You should be free to yell “fire” in a crowded theatre since if it was legal no one would be pay attention to the yeller.

    Should there be any banned speech?. Well – you can’t let people lie under oath in a courtroom. That’s the only exception i can think of.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  52. @Mike Tre

    It is pretty darn funny. Thanks for sharing.

    I can’t help thinking that if the video were used as the basis of a scene in a Hollywood movie, a white guy would be cast as the clumsy burglar.

  53. Rowan Atkinson was born on January 6 (!), 1955. Free speech is so “Boomer”!

    Have at him, kids! Wave those tattoos!

  54. j3 says:

    It’s an attempt to destroy the human spirit by those who don’t have that spirit.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  55. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Chris Moore

    One faction of so-called “whites” is half-assing a genocidal campaign against another faction of so-called “whites,” using da joos as storm troopers.

    White isn’t even a race. It’s a Regime shibboleth. It’s an American legal category invented for the convenience of the envy bureaucracy. Anglo is a race. Teutonic is a race. Spaniard is a race. Speaking of, Bantu is a race. Colours aren’t races.

    Blaming envy on a particular race suggests you want to cling to envy. Even if you manage to finally solve the race problem, the envy problem will remain. It will accomplish nothing.

    The Regime is weak because, for some reason, the rich envy the poor. They’re afraid the paupers will take all their stuff? They desire a tranquil, trouble-free life and thought having lots of real estate would provide this?

    They desperately wish they weren’t addicted to power?

    In any case, when the rich envy the poor, they stab themselves and twist the knife. No wonder they can’t get anything done.

    Except when the poor are Nietzschean slave moralists, and want to be oppressed. Want to get their v-card punched, which in this case stands for [victim]. Need a perpetrator farm to supply the demand for victimization.

    As a bonus, American wealthy get money by stealing, which means they feel agonizing envy for anyone who can get wealth without stealing.

    Thus, rich Americans envy lords, and envy the lord’s peasants too.

  56. Alrenous says: • Website
    @HammerJack

    In other words a completely bog-standard hierarchy where everyone is insecure and has to punch down, except they’re lying about it more than usual.

    They used to deal with their insecurity by bragging about their wealth and deliberately pretending everyone desperately needs to be rich(er) the way they do. Now they double down on the lies, pretending that the lower classes are in fact the oppressive upper classes.

  57. Lurker says:
    @Wokechoke

    Choking a darkie is another variation.

    Some in there I recognise.

    ‘Germans’ meaning German bands = hands.

    ‘Mincers’ meaning mince pies = eyes.

  58. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Wade Hampton

    Okay, let’s look at history.

    When the UN was kicked out, Somalia experienced stronger-than-Chinese economic growth. Half a decade to make half their social problems simply vanish.

    The problem with blacks is mainly exposure to Americans.

    Let’s look at history again.

    Early 1900 American Bantu: 10% bastardy rate.
    Soon after civil rights: 80% bastardy rate.

    Biology can’t explain both a 10% bastardy rate and an 80% bastardy rate.

    Progressives are hyper-racist. The point of all those anti-racist screeds is to repeat the anti-Bantu rumours in a plausibly-deniable way. White man’s burden is still white man’s burden when it’s reversed; whether it’s your duty to help or your duty to stop harm, it really is racism, meaning a race-motivated crime. The term [meddling] sounds mild, and is in fact quite possibly the worst possible sin. Meddling is the core of leftism.

    Indeed Bantu weren’t underperforming nearly enough to satisfy Progressive status anxiety, so Bantu-Americans were sabotaged repeatedly. Their desperation for superiority is insatiable.

    I especially enjoy how Obama’s main draw was acting white. Just in case you weren’t sure Progressives have a rancid hatred for Bantu.

    The point is to get everyone full of Pride and the concomitant spiteful Envy. Sure they want it to be backhanded the way they do it, but your straightforward nosiness is the backup plan. It’s a trap. Obey the Regime or reverse-obey the Regime and think you’re a dissident.

    Ultimately, Progressives are a kind of Puritan. They are terrified that god might love anyone more than they’re loved. Hence, they must drive everyone else to sin even more than they do. Superbia, luxuria, gula, invidia. Otherwise daddy will leave, see?

    Move away from Bantu, then forget they exist. Their problems are not your problems. Stop letting Progressives make it your problem.

  59. Alrenous says: • Website
    @beavertales

    If you aim at the king, you best not miss.

    If you play the game of thrones, you win thorny prizes.

  60. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Hang All Text Drivers

    Murder is eugenic. Legalize homicide.

  61. j3 says:
    @Chris Moore

    Either my eyes and ears are opening up or UNZ comments are getting a lot better these days.

  62. Wokechoke says:
    @frankie p

    “trouble on the dog” would be the “wife on the phone”. You drop the second word too smooth out the code speak.

  63. A few weeks ago I wrote a comment describing how I’ve observed Jews simultaneously assert and deny something within the same breadth.

    The comedian clip is a good example of this. The guy says:

    “When I heard “Jews will not replace us” I laughed so hard. What the fuck job do you have, that Jews are coming for ya – we don’t want to work at Hobby Lobby…Heckler: “TV!”

    The Jew’s word could be rephrased as:

    “We don’t want your shitty jobs. We have good jobs…[Heckler: for example, TV jobs!]”

    The Jew simultaneously asserts that Jews are disproportionally well-off and then claims it is anti-semitic to give an example of the type of “good jobs” that Jews have. Simultaneous assertion and denial.

    Later in the clip, after the audience couple says they work in TV, the Jew asks them for their employer and threatens to send the clip to the employer. Of course, he would say that the threat is being made ironically, but it is still a threat, based on the thing he is denying is true, which he, being in show biz and from the couple’s statments, knows to be true.

    I have experienced similar things like:

    Jew: “I am going to have you blacklisted on Wall Street by saying you are an anti-semite, Mario!”
    Mario: so it’s true? Jews run Wall Street?
    Jew: “how dare you!”

    This ties into Anglin and others’ observations that Jews have female personalities. They don’t evaluate statements based on their truth value, but on whether the statement either serves their interests or makes them feel good. So if a Jew wants to talk about how smart and awesome they are, they will admit that they run [insert prestigious Jew run industry.] They are especially inclined to do this if they think it will make a goy feel inferior to them. But if a goy observes the same thing, they will object because they feel that such a revelation will deny them intersectional pokemon oppression points.

    It’s kind of like how skanks will get half-naked and go on “Slut marches” to prove they are not sluts. They want to be sluts and to celebrate their sluttery, while demanding that you simultaneously notice and not notice.

    Everything with Jews is doublethink: Ukraine needs more weapons both because they are winning so hard and losing so hard. The vaxx is so effective that you should take it, but so not effective that you need endless doses. Juan Guaido is the president of Venezuela, but they have to beg Maduro for oil. Israel is threatened by Palestinians, but they are our greatest ally because their military is so good that they can crush anyone they feel like. Jews are oppressed, but if you make a joke about them, they will use their powerful network to crush you or call on the government to arrest you…

    I think part of the reason people have a special hatred for Jews is this constant switching they do between “pity play” and “power play.” Both are paths to getting something from someone else – one yields sympathy and the other yields fear/respect. But when played simultaneously they cancel each other out – one does pity one who intimidates and one does not fear someone pitiful, but watching someone shamelessly use both naturally disgusts any right thinking person.

    It’s all so tiresome.

    • Replies: @Mario Partisan
  64. @Mario Partisan

    Another example of Jew doublethink from an internet discussion forum that I just came across:

    Most people do not realize that The Federal Reserve was initially created by a secret cabal of rich elite via deceptive maneuvers.

    Anti-Semitic tirade. Not necessarily limited to Jews, but certainly inclusive. Some people know how to interpret the codewords.

    https://community.oilprice.com/topic/31198-the-federal-reserve-and-moneyaspects-which-are-not-widely-known/

    The Jew replying can’t stop themselves from revealing that they immediately think “Jew” when someone mentions a secret cabal that runs the Fed. But it’s “anti-Semitic” which is a Jew code word for “false.”

    Jew doublethink is so pervasive that examples “literally” fall in your lap right when you are posting about it. LOL!

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  65. @j3

    We’ve had our fill of j2 so now we get j3.

  66. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Mario Partisan

    The Jew replying can’t stop themselves from revealing that they immediately think “Jew” when someone mentions a secret cabal that runs the Fed. But it’s “anti-Semitic” which is a Jew code word for “false.” Jew doublethink is so pervasive

    Another word for doublethink is schizophrenia.

  67. Richard B says:
    @Mike Tre

    This is the funniest negro breaking into a liquor store footage I have ever seen.

    Agreed!

    Pretty much wraps up the negro’s entire existence in 3 minutes.

    Worse.

    It’s why the USA has been blessed with Junteenth. To celebrate the likes of guys like him.

  68. awry says:
    @Anon

    Good line, but she wasn’t a “moron”. She attended school for five years, then gave birth to an illegitimate child. Her adoptive family had her institutionalized as “feeble-minded” out of embarrassment, because their nephew raped her. Researchers who saw her later in life claimed she was of normal intelligence. Her daughter attended school until she died at 8 and was apparently of normal intelligence too. Carrie Buck’s mother was probably feeble-minded though.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2