Here's my conversation with Volodymyr Zelenskyy (@ZelenskyyUa).
It was an intense and heartfelt conversation, my goal for which was to do my small part in pushing for peace.
We spoke in a mix of 3 languages: English, Ukrainian, and Russian. It's fully dubbed in each of those 3… pic.twitter.com/2zoxM0FG89
— Lex Fridman (@lexfridman) January 5, 2025
In Bizarro World, Batman is the world’s worst detective. His name is “Batzarro.”
Just so, Lex Fridman is the Bizarro World version of Joe Rogan. Lex Fridman is the world’s worst podcaster. He started his show based entirely on the Rogan model, and got popular purely as a result of Jewish nepotism.
You can say what you want about Joe Rogan. I have some negative things to say about him. But he has a good podcast. He has all of the traits of a good podcaster: he’s friendly, well-informed, charismatic, good at talking to people, curious and interested in things. Joe is the kind of guy that anyone would feel comfortable talking to, and this comes out in his interviews, as he gets the most interesting conversations out of people. Fridman is the opposite of all of that.
But Lex and Volognomdomor Zielinseyyyieyy are cousins, so the Ukrainian dictator did his big Western media interview with Bizarre Joe Rogan instead of the normal world’s Joe Rogan.
This is hilarious. These ratty, smelly-looking Jews are both like 4’9″. They both wear lifts, but they can’t lift on each other.
The show was horrible. As horrible as you can imagine.
I didn’t watch the whole thing, because who has time for that, but several people did watch it, apparently, and it’s clear that Lex agreed beforehand not to ask any questions about the war which were not pre-scripted.
In the clips, you can see Zelensky saying ridiculous, nonsense things, and Lex doesn’t push back.
Zelensky said that Putin was planning to invade and conquer all of Europe.
Zelenskyy to Fridman: If you say there’s a risk that President Trump will withdraw from NATO, it’s a U.S. decision, but if it happens, Putin will destroy Europe. pic.twitter.com/TI7V0wFQWG
— UNITED24 Media (@United24media) January 5, 2025
I would think even like, a CNN host would push back on that. No one anywhere thinks that. Certainly, podcast audiences tend to be better informed than TV-watchers, and I think even Ukraine-supporters (trannies, neo-Nazis) know this isn’t true. They’ll say Putin will invade Poland, maybe, but to say he’s going to “destroy Europe” is like a parody of hysterical trannies.
Zelensky took the opportunity of the interview to call for Ukraine to be allowed in NATO.
He admitted that Trump would have to support him, because European allies don’t have the military to defend the Ukraine. Lex of course did not ask why, if Putin is getting ready to conquer Europe and Europeans can’t fight him, they are not doing mass conscription and building up a huge military to repel the Russian invasion. It seems like even a very stupid person would be asking that question in his head, but Lex pretends as though he didn’t think of it. (Maybe he didn’t, he does appear uniquely dumb. But that further shows how ridiculous it is that Zelensky appeared on his show instead of with Joe or Tucker Carlson.)
Lex did ask if “Ukraine people” could simply forgive Russia.
Zelensky responded by claiming that Russians were ripping the heads off of babies and no one could ever be forgiven for such an action.
Lex Fridman asks Zelensky: “Can’t Ukrainians just forgive Russia?”
Watch Zelensky’s response pic.twitter.com/0bEV6hECBD
— Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 (@DrewPavlou) January 5, 2025
Obviously, this is part of an attempt by Zelensky’s people to get some kind of inroads into Western internet culture as they are trying to cozy up to Donald Trump. But the handlers are too uptight. He could have done a normal interview with Joe Rogan, without a translator (his English is fine, frankly, but they used dubbing for the most of the show because Lex speaks Russian). Even if Joe would have pressed him on some of the issues, it would come off better than this garbage, which should, frankly, destroy Lex’ career. This is an abomination, to present this fake interview, a propaganda piece for the war, as real internet journalism.
No one is going to take this seriously.
Maybe Donald Trump will continue to support the war. He has definitely wobbled bigly on the issue. But Zelensky is not making that any easier. There is a certain level of lies you can get away with, but telling people on the internet that Russia is going to march on Paris is beyond that level. Zelensky looks much worse for having done this stupid fake interview.

RSS









Lex is hooked hard on Valium. Jesus, I always think he is the most somnambulant interviewer in recorded history. He kinda looks like a sloth.
“They’ll say Putin will invade Poland, …”
Poland is chocked the fuck full, FULL of grouchy Polacks who do NOT want to be invaded and are in no way gonna till the land, bend the knee and hand over resources to the Russians.
Jesus. The Donbas is 66% Russian and it took 2 fuckin years to take that.
Even Hitler on cocaine would not invade Poland now.
Imagine how much money it would cost to keep the Polacks “down on the farm” after you rolled in with tanks and troops.
I can just see the millions of neocon whack jobs all over the world jumping in the air, clicking their heels together at the realization that a new land war in Europe was under way.
Vicky Nuland and Liz Cheney would clear the shelves as they leaked uncontrollably into their drawers.
https://www.graylinemedical.com/products/kimberly-clark-poise-extra-absorbency-incontinence-pads-poise-incontinence-pad-liner-extra-absorbency-9-12-19564?variant=31853460357177&msclkid=11921b0702de1d37aa1f7c7ceb100ac6
NO ONE IS INVADING FUCK’N POLAND.
Andrew’s writing is kray kray.
And that’s why I luv ‘im.
I kind of like Lex. And he’s certainly not dumb, he has a Ph.D. in computer and electrical engineering and his dad is a physics professor. He just has a very laid back demeanor. I think having Zelensky as a guest was for the ratings and/or attention and I’m sure the State Department and CIA was pestering to have him on.
Zelensky’s star is fading fast and he’ll be dead or in obscure exile in the near future. And Ukraine will be the size of Czechia (after Poland, Hungary, Romania, Moldova gobble up western Ukraine). Sad for 1.5 million Ukrainians who gave up their lives and limbs.
Yeah, too bad Lex hasn’t read Scott Horton’s new book, Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine, and asked just a few simple questions based on it.
But I guess if he had, the interview would’ve ended with Lex having to use his MMA skills to restrain Zelensky, with a rear naked choke hold or reverse armbar submission.
Vicky Nuland and Liz Cheney would clear the shelves as they leaked uncontrollably into their drawers.
What did Nuland do exactly? I don’t understand the obsession with a 4th level diplomat.
Please use rational cause and effect thinking like a White man to explain how a Jewish diplomat who was 4 levels from the director was able to cause a coup.
Do explain how it was Nuland and not the Ukrainian Parliament that removed a corrupt pro-Russian president who is on video looting his own mansion before fleeing to Russia.
Note that said president’s own pro-Russian party disavowed him as a criminal.
I’m also waiting for an explanation from Anglin on why White people should support Russia and not Ukraine.
Please provide a rational explanation based on gains/losses instead of sounding like Scooby Doo and repeating JEWBY JEWBY JEWS as if that is enough.
Or just fill in this sentence:
Christian Slavs on both sides need to kill each other in trenches because……….?
Please show us your ability to think and speak rationally like a White man on Ukraine. Thank you.
Not the first interview in which Lex is showing no depth and all grift.
Publishing as a metronome, on any field of expertise, is a dead venue for most alt. channels. It is obvious in a society based on greed. We should as an elite(agency of some kind) tweak the systemics, not our standing to the most. Another Alexander Mercouris peddling t-shirts, a Scott Ritter(hammering on morals, while our elites exclude this from any call to action), a Nima(wise enough to leave all initiative to guests, which is exploited to the listener’s benefit by the likes of a Krainer(some good core understandings) and some others).
Leave the rest to youtube, tweaking algorithms, to coders, all for open source, as in begging “plea…se google pick me up as corporate fodder”. They(the above) have a word for it, “monetise”.
Well Anglin, do you think Putin should invade and conquer all of Europe?
Probably the best thing that could happen to Europe, but why would a sane Russian want to get himself so covered with trash?
What’s wrong with neutrality?
“Lex Fridman is a fascinating case study – and a great litmus test of a person’s judgment, in a sense..
On the surface, he’s the most soft, kindly, unoffensive baby-faced fellow, with the most impressive list of guests, some of whom are legitimately fascinating and worthwhile listens.
But watch closely as to the net-effects of this ‘can’t we all just get along and love one another’ attitude and approach, and how it manifests:
He called Epstein ‘just some rich guy’, completely denying any larger conspiracy, even the patently obvious m05sad connections.
He repeatedly (if indirectly) defends many of the worst people on earth, seemingly denying even the possibility of corruption, conspiracy, or any happenings that are readily visible at a superficial glance.
He did more effective damage control for big pharma than perhaps anyone else in the public sphere, bringing several of these execs on and allowing them to state their case in full, relatively unchallenged and uninterrupted.
I could go on citing enough examples like this to fill a novel..
Leaving aside his intelligence/Israeli connections for a moment, and his out-of-nowhere rise to extreme prominence (reminiscent of ‘h3h3’ and others) practically overnight – consider for a moment that the net-effect of his approach is to both provide a platform for some of the most shamelessly and brazenly corrupt individuals and institutions in the world, while disarming the audience, and then working to reorient their framework into one of oblivious and naive trust. “Let’s just give everyone the benefit of the doubt – even if they’ve proven time and time again to not deserve it, and the costs of being wrong here are astronomical, lets just be kind!”
By kind, he seems to mean ‘permissive’, ‘passive’.. ‘unthinking’ and ‘uncritical’.
For the longest time I wanted to like the guy, the nice-guy routine is superficially convincing.. yet I’d suggest it’s figures like this that most powerfully work to keep us from reacting in a healthy and natural way to men like Gates, Soros, jab manufacturers, Epstein/Maxwell.
It’s almost like that’s his very role.
Though, if true, this would be something of a conspiracy – and Lex makes it clear that these essentially don’t exist.
If certain forces were to manufacture a pop culture figure who would most efficiently keep people from asking the most important questions – or arriving at the most reasonable suspicions based on the totality of our context picture – I suspect it’d be an exacting duplicate of Lex
important postscript…
Many of those most hoodwinked by his approach are genuinely good people, who deserve some patience (not mockery). A reminder that many innately trustworthy people can’t help but become overly trusting, as resulting side-effect..
a strength, in healthy and well-oriented and relatively homogeneous environments in which corruption isn’t rampant and all-pervasive.
a weakness, in environments like our own at the present.. in which they risk being thoroughly (often effortlessly) duped, at every turn.
They’re also the type that once they understand, once they’re able to make that turn or shift, make for sturdy, principled, invaluable allies.”
“Neutrality” is not an option. The Ukraine can either exist within the American sphere or it can exist within the Russian sphere. If one wants it to exist within the American sphere, then he wants Russia to be defeated and destroyed, which means he also wants China to be defeated, which means he wants American global domination. There is no possible neutral stance. It’s obvious why John Johnson wants American domination, since he is a Jew (as revealed by his histrionic reaction to that Jewish rave slut being “raped” and killed), but there is no reason for anyone who is not a Jew or a homosexual to desire this.
Glad we are that you took some time away from helping OJ look for the real killers to weigh in on issues in some deep intellectual water.
Oh…, that’s right, your grasp of the obvious, is commensurate with your tenuous erudition re: history and current events over the last 75 years.
Let’s start off with the fact that we have had our asses handed to us in most every conflict since Vietnam (Gulf of Tonkin = Lies – WMD = Lies 20 years of lies in Afghanistan etc.) but now, oh sure, what is a couple of hundred billion to prop up some Jew fuck that answers to the Rothschilds, BlackRock, Boeing, Lockheed Martin and the panoply of Neocon killers who live all along the Acela Corridor making bank on the backs of the dead and fooling toaster oven IQ’s like yours into knots every time someone busts out a new flag (This one is so, so pretty, yellow and blue!) and waxes less than poetically about “democracy”.
How ’bout this gargoyle.
In 1823 Americans sorely sick of nations all over the globe interfering in our affairs, produced, President Monroe’s “Monroe Doctrine”. Essentially, it stated that if you came too close, got into our backyard, we would react and react violently. We used this doctrine to invade Panama and Grenada and, oh yeah, when the Russians put missiles in Cuba.
Now, not being very informed on our freshly remembered past, you might not be aware of the use of this doctrine, by the Russians, to do EXACTLY WHAT THE RUSSIANS DID IN THE UKRAINE WHEN WE DECIDED TO HAVE THEM JOIN NATO, PUT BIOLOGICAL LABS FULL OF GOD KNOWS WHAT THERE AND TO YES, PUT FUCK’N MISSILES THERE.
There are actually many, many more reasons why the Russians should resist the NATO NEOCON whack jobs that want suzerainty over lands 10s of thousands of miles away from their own countries (Greedy Jews wanting control of oil, ((Soros has been at war with Russia in Ukraine in one way or another for 25 years)) cash and seeking more wage slaves to “work” the highest quality land on earth – Ukraine is like Iowa in that the glaciers stopped there and anything will grow there.) and of course, just the genetic disposition that Jews have to control everything by tricking salt of the earth fools like you into signing up for a “forever war” to save “democracy”.
Hope that is “white” enough for ya.
The powers-that-be are pushing for a Trump war in Ukraine.
The English voiceover sounds weird, but Volodymyr can be hard to listen to. This approach also may have a wider audience.
I assume it is full Western propaganda designed to establish a so-called “moderate” Ukrainian position which is completely unacceptable to Russia and therefore keeps the fighting alive.
These two do not seem to be the brightest bulbs. Are there any points where they trip on the narrative and give away a useful tidbit?
This is true. These areas are so concrete and rebar these days.
Every large town is like a bunker complex.
Johnson has got to be Jewish given his reactions to various triggers.
It’s like the Bob Zimmerman album. It’s just Jew on Jew instead of Blonde on Blonde.
Namely fake folksy shit.
What did Nuland do exactly? I don’t understand the obsession with a 4th level diplomat.
Weeks after the war began in 2022 both sides were on the verge of a peace agreement until Nuland and Boris Johnson convinced Ukraine to back out, according to then-Israeli PM Naftali Bennett and Ukraine’s lead negotiator Davyd Arakhamia.
In fact Nuland herself admitted it:
Video Link
Both Zelensky and Friedman are JMJ or Jewish-made-Jews.
Weeks after the war began in 2022 both sides were on the verge of a peace agreement until Nuland and Boris Johnson convinced Ukraine to back out, according to then-Israeli PM Naftali Bennett and Ukraine’s lead negotiator Davyd Arakhamia.
That is not what the video shows.
Here is the story from a Russian source:
https://www.rt.com/news/603708-ukraine-istanbul-us-nuland/
She was giving her opinion in an interview.
Your video does not show that she pressured a head of state into accepting a position. It only shows her opinion on the subject.
The peace agreement you are referring to was never proposed to Zelensky and the host of that video (Glenn Greenwald, a known Putin supporter) did not investigate the weapons clause to which she referred.
The proposal included requiring that Ukraine hand over their long range artillery and also not be a part of NATO. That is why it was rejected and not because of a Jewish conspiracy.
Or go ahead and explain as to how that wouldn’t simply be a trick to get Ukraine to demilitarize so Russia can then invade again.
I asked for how she caused a coup with her Jew powers. That is the common accusation that no one has explained.
Johnson has got to be Jewish given his reactions to various triggers.
Everyone note that Wokechoke is still unable to provide a rational explanation for his support of Putin. The 2.5 week special operation has been going on for 3 years and Wokechoke is still unable to articulate 2 or 3 sentences on why it is pro-White to support Russia.
As with the estrogen ridden liberal woman he can only make personal accusations against those damn critical thinking White men that undermine his precious narrative.
He still calls the critics Jews even though we were right about this war being a stupid idea where Christian Slavs would die and the Western status quo wouldn’t change. NATO has expanded by two countries and US defense companies have had record profits. He doesn’t deny that at all.
He doesn’t deny that around half a million Christians have died or that Russia’s birth rate is at an all time low. Russian Slavs actually had more children under the USSR.
He doesn’t deny that the Ruble hit a 10 year low against the dollar. Hey remember all the “dollar is doomed” posters when this war started? They also called the critics Jews even though one of the main proponents of the theory was Jewish. But I guess that Jewish youtube bloggers get a pass if they play the right notes.
He can’t explain how this war does anything for us.
All he can do is yell JEW and hope the critics get bored with the idiots and move on to something else.
Say it again Wokechoke, it’s all you have. You’re unable to explain yourself just like the frustrated liberal woman who is faced with unwanted facts.
Max:
While Anglin calls Fridman “bizarro Rogan” I think he’s closer to “bizarro Nima” of Dialogue Works.
Yea Anglin why would anyone dare suggest that Russia would attack a NATO member. Only idiots would discuss such ideas.
Russian state media discusses nuking Britain.
Video Link
In another recent video they talk about how cutting internet cables is fair game. Well that is actually an attack since it wasn’t in international waters.
Oh and the Dr.No looking host is Putin’s proudly Jewish chief propagandist who hides a male model son in London:
https://mythdetector.com/en/what-do-we-know-about-the-modelling-career-of-daniil-solovyov-and-who-is-depicted-on-the-viral-pictures/
Looks like he married a tall White woman to offset his short genes. Both he and Putin are around 5’1.
Seems you don’t know the dwarf and his henchmen. Or you just go out of your way to ignore his Jewish media pal while railing about Jewish media in the West.
I’d love to see the millions of Muslims in Western Europe, after Putin invaded, being told that there is no more free ride. I’d really love to see them shot after they started rioting under Russian occupation. Unlike the Western cucks, the Russians will not play games.
{….after Putin invaded…..}
IF Putin invaded.
Which will never happen.
Putin will not even invade Ukraine West of the Dnieper river: why in the world would Putin or any Russian leader after Putin invade Western Europe?
What for?
There is nothing in Western Europe that Putin/Russia needs or wants.
Nothing but trouble.
If NATO/Western Europe attacks Russia — for Ukraine — then it will go nuclear very quickly and it will be lights out for Western Europe. Oreshniks with nuclear warheads will be raining down on England, France , Germany, Poland,…….
JJ, you are a consistent troll. I guess your style of trolling is distraction and exhaustion. If you were not intentionally misleading people your consistency might be comforting.
Nuland is half of a Neocon power couple. She is married to Robert Kagan who is the cofounder of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which created one of the most evil warmongering projects in Western history. The NATO and CIA and Neocon schemes to break up Russia are well known. Flipping Ukraine has always been a central part of this pressure campaign against Russia.
The West turned Ukraine into a pawn to fight a proxy war against Russia. I don’t know why you try to hide this information. Your fellow travelers are proud of this evil project and are not shy about throwing it in everyone’s face.
Moscow wants a buffer zone between Russia and the West (NATO). I think the value of this buffer to the Kremlin is 2/3 symbolic and 1/3 practical. If the Russian border gets moved to the Dniepr then Western Ukraine may become this buffer. Russia does not want to control this area, but the West may force this state of affairs in an effort to weaken Russia. At the moment this seems pretty likely. It will take several years.
Finland dropping out of NATO might be one way to avoid this. This would be a tacit acknowledgement that Russia’s buffer idea has validity. At some point the Finns will realize that joining NATO was the stupidest thing they could ever do.
The Awesome Negress says it like it is.
Thanks for posting an article that backs up Greenwald’s claims. BTW that article contains this gem:
Nuland played a key role in the violent Western-backed coup in Kiev in 2014, which toppled Ukraine’s democratically elected president, Viktor Yanukovich.
Your video does not show that she pressured a head of state into accepting a position. It only shows her opinion on the subject.
Now you’re just playing dumb. Nuland was representing the US gov’t, Ukraine’s top backer. She was not a private citizen from a think tank.
(Glenn Greenwald, a known Putin supporter)
Are Naftali Bennet and Davyd Arakhamia also Putin supporters?
JJ, you are a consistent troll. I guess your style of trolling is distraction and exhaustion. If you were not intentionally misleading people your consistency might be comforting.
Did you want to give an explanation for why pointing out Jews in US government is acceptable but pointing out Jews in Russian government is trolling?
Nuland is half of a Neocon power couple.
I really don’t care if she is part of a 4 way satanic dyke couple. I’ve asked for an explanation of how she caused a pro-Russian president to take millions in bribes and then be removed by Parliament. Still no explanation. You’re not working with reality as it exists. You want everything to be about some Jewish conspiracy and with no questions asked.
The West turned Ukraine into a pawn to fight a proxy war against Russia. I don’t know why you try to hide this information. Your fellow travelers are proud of this evil project and are not shy about throwing it in everyone’s face.
Did you want to try explaining how it is the pro-White position to support Russia?
What do rural Russians gain from this war? Go ahead and explain. As with the “Nuland coup” there hasn’t been a rational explanation.
I judge wars based on who gains and loses. What do Russians gain from this war? We know that US defense industries are having record profits. You can allege conspiracy and malice on the part of US leaders but that still isn’t an explanation for why the Russian people should die for land beyond their 1991 borders. You simply haven’t given a rational explanation for why they should lose sons and fathers. Russia has plenty of land. Why should some Russian girl lose her father? Why is that needed? What do the people gain over US shareholders?
Exactly. Both make you wonder how they attracted so many famous guests.
Geographically, Europe is an appendix to the Eurasian landmass. Given how full of faeces it has become, the only thing Russia could gain by invading it is appendicitis.
Putin will not even invade Ukraine West of the Dnieper river: why in the world would Putin or any Russian leader after Putin invade Western Europe?
Scott Ritter made a similar argument in Russian News. He wrote a long rant about how Russia won’t invade Ukraine and it’s all the imagination of the CIA.
What for?
There is nothing in Western Europe that Putin/Russia needs or wants.
They would like the Baltics back under their control and that is openly discussed on Russian totalitarian state tv.
Russians commonly view the Baltics and Poland as deserving to be ruled by Moscow. Putin is on record stating that the USSR should not have fallen and that it was an extension of the Russian empire.
They view the Baltics as lost territories. The Poles are viewed as a subclass of people. It’s very similar to the 1930s German view of Poland. Basically not a real state since they have had so many rulers.
If not for NATO they would absolutely try to take them back. When Putin was in the KGB he was adamantly against letting GDR leave.
A large majority of Russians (80%+) support Putin and the SMO in Ukraine, they know what they gain. You are trolling by pretending not to know.
NATO wanted to expand directly to the Russian border, flipping Russia’s strongest ally against it in the process. Because of the positive ties between Russia and Ukraine, bringing it into NATO is much more serious than the Balts or Finland joining NATO.
For a time, Nuland was the face of the Western regime change operation in Ukraine against Russia. I agree she is not the architect of this project, but she was working to make it happen at a critical juncture (Maidan).
Avoiding nuclear war is pro-everyone.
I know nothing about rural Russians.
Why should all Ukrainians want to die because they hate Russians so much, because they want to destroy the Russian Orthodox Church, because they want to close down all Russian media, because they want to close down Russian political parties, because they want to ban Russian language, burn Russian books, ban Russian culture, tear down Russian monuments, join NATO and the EU, celebrate Bandera and the UkroNazis? Does this make sense? Well, if so they want so they should have. The only criticism one can have is that Russians are doing it peacemeal, instead of pressing the button and wiping them all out in an instant without incurring any losses of their own. As if anyone could do anything about it except complain in their yellow press, and complain about nothing at all. So an entire nation of hateful Nazi scum gets wiped out. Big deal. Pity for any decent few among them. It’s called “collateral” according to the terminology introduced by the West.
When the Soviets allowed for Germany’s reunfication, they were promised that NATO wouldn’t move an inch eastward. But it moved by hundreds of miles. Well, it’s time to roll NATO back to where it used to be. Liars and cheats deserve their comeuppance.
Propaganda jew interviews NWO jew.
What more do you need to know?
What a joke!
When the Soviets allowed for Germany’s reunfication, they were promised that NATO wouldn’t move an inch eastward.
That was never a promise made by NATO.
Go ahead and source it.
Fact Check: NATO Did NOT Sign Agreement Not To Expand Eastwards After Soviet Union’s Fall
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2023/05/fact-check-nato-did-not-sign-an-agreement-not-to-expand-eastwards-after-soviet-union-fall.html
A single member cannot speak on the behalf of the organization. A change in policy would require a vote which didn’t happen.
You might want to fact-check what you read from pro-Putin bloggers.
Russia did however sign an agreement to recognize the 1991 borders of Ukraine. That was signed by Russian as part of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.
“Budapest memorandum” was not an agreement. It was just as it says on the cover: a memo, non-binding.
Friedbrain is just another kike nepo-baby who came out of nowhere using dark money to dominate a choke point that a truth-speaking goyim might have dominated, and we can’t have that, now can we?
He’s obviously got an IQ around 100.
Actually, the USG did lie to the Russians and say NATO wouldn’t expand eastward (after “expanding” eastward to include all of reunified Germany).
Stupid flathead Russians didn’t get it in writing, of course, but that doesn’t mean the lying kike-simp American gov’t didn’t tell the lie. Which they did.
“Russia did however sign an agreement to recognize the 1991 borders of Ukraine. That was signed by Russian as part of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.”
And they do recognized them. They had to know where they were before rolling over them and fucking the idiot kike-tool Ukrainians in the ass.
“Please use rational cause and effect thinking like a White man to explain how a Jewish diplomat who was 4 levels from the director was able to cause a coup.”
Please explain why it takes explaining as to how Nuland could foment a coup. It’s one of those ipso facto things. I’d think a reasonable person would need an explanation as to why someone in Nuland’s position isn’t capable of fomenting a coup.
“Do explain how it was Nuland and not the Ukrainian Parliament that removed a corrupt pro-Russian president who is on video looting his own mansion before fleeing to Russia.”
Explain how these things are mutually exclusive, the way you’re implying.
P.S., are you a kike or a zionist? If you are, I’ll save us both some time and stop engaging with you as if you might be human.
P.P.S., never mind, life’s too short, and you absolutely stink of kike.
“Budapest memorandum” was not an agreement. It was just as it says on the cover: a memo, non-binding.
A memo huh? Just jotting down a memo?
Well you’re wrong as it is a signed agreement that contains these sections:
Refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of the signatories to the memorandum, and undertake that none of their weapons will ever be used against these countries, except in cases of self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
Respect the signatory’s independence and sovereignty in the existing borders (in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act).[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
Which means Russia signed an agreement to not attack Ukraine and respect their 1994 borders.
Video Link
Actually, the USG did lie to the Russians and say NATO wouldn’t expand eastward (after “expanding” eastward to include all of reunified Germany).
Who exactly made that claim and how would it be legally binding?
Could a diplomat from Siberia make a verbal claim that is legally binding to BRICS?
NATO has very clear rules and procedures. Limiting NATO membership would require a vote by all members.
It isn’t the fault of NATO if the Russians didn’t understand how the organization works. In any case you are working on hearsay. You are correct that they had nothing in writing.
Russia would never agree to security limits based on an American diplomat retelling a conversation. That’s ridiculous and such a standard would never be held to any country. It’s basically “Cause Bob Johnson said so at lunch”.
And they do recognized them. They had to know where they were before rolling over them and fucking the idiot kike-tool Ukrainians in the ass.
So you agree that they violated the 1994 Budapest Memorandum by invading then, correct?
Do you think they should have invaded Finland first if the goal was to stop NATO from expanding?
“Scott Ritter made a similar argument in Russian News. He wrote a long rant about how Russia won’t invade Ukraine and it’s all the imagination of the CIA.”
Who gives a shit? Ritter’s a retard.
“It’s obvious why John Johnson wants American domination, since he is a Jew (as revealed by his histrionic reaction to that Jewish rave slut being “raped” and killed),”
Lol, it’s obvious from his loyalties, his shitty posting style, his shitty takes, his shitty attitude, and the large amount of time he has to do Hasbara on the clock (maybe he’s getting chatgpt to write that scheisse, so caveat emptor on the time thing). I sussed him out in like 1m flat from like two paragraphs in this thread.
Kikes can’t hide their stink. It’s too easy anymore: nobody who isn’t a kike or in their pay supports Weimerica’s vileness. Fucking zoomer normies know the kikes have to go. (Hey kike, explain to us how I knew you were a kike after reading you for 30 seconds. I mean, you’d think being a stark raving antisemite would impair my faculties, but it seems to have sharpened them in this case – how does that feel, knowing I smelled the stink on you from – presumably – hundreds or thousands of miles away?)
“Russians commonly view the Baltics and Poland as deserving to be ruled by Moscow [lie, citation needed]. Putin is on record stating that the USSR should not have fallen and that it was an extension of the Russian empire [so what? Tendentious irrelevant bullshit].
They view the Baltics as lost territories [They ARE lost territories, smooth-brain]. The Poles are viewed as a subclass of people. It’s very similar to the 1930s German view of Poland. Basically not a real state since they have had so many rulers.”
Lol, yes, you kikes’ view of the Russians is very similar to the traditional kike view of Germans, and all goyim among whom your slithering tribe can “pass” (Europeans and Southwest Asians); you have to enslave us.
“If not for NATO they would absolutely try to take them back [lie, unfalsifiable]. When Putin was in the KGB he was adamantly against letting GDR leave [irrelevant].”
Your (phony) insistence on rigor and evidence seems to have faltered, when it comes to your own pronouncements. Of course Russia wouldn’t try to “take” Poland if there was no NATO. And you have zero evidence that they would. You’re a fucking clown, and you say stupid shit.
I forgot to mention that kikes are fraudsters, terrorists, murderers, child-traffickers, sodomites, pimps, organ-traffickers, drug-dealers, transsexuals, perverts, saboteurs, traitors, liars, baby-killers and genocidaires, and they committed slow-rolling suicide, starting on October 8th, 2023; at the risk of a lowbrow pop culture reference, as the darkie said in Gladiator, “he must kill your name before he kills you.” But the kikes have done it to themselves. I’m all stocked up on popcorn.
Again, this memo was non-binding.