The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
Hunt for the Great White Speech Criminal
Glenn Greenwald has Written the Defining Article of 2021
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

He might be a homosexual Jew, but Glenn Greenwald is a legend and a hero, and his recent piece ripping apart the hall monitor censorship beat of the mainstream media is the article of the year.

Most importantly, it inspired me to write the funniest article of the year, “Suspicions of Racial Bias Abound After Illinois Trampoline Park Cancels Teen Night.”

If you look out at the media landscape, there is virtually no one willing to tell the truth, and Glenn always does. I would even say he’s better than Tucker Carlson, because Tucker Carlson, wittingly or not, puts out State Department and Israeli government propaganda about China.

You can say whatever you want about Glenn. Obviously, he’s not a repentant Jew (which is the only theoretical “good Jew”), because if he was he wouldn’t be engaging in homosexuality. Maybe he’s just supporting the freedom of people who Jews hate for the purposes of being transgressive. It’s possible or perhaps probable that he’s literally a Jew transgressing against collective Judaism.

Or, maybe it all goes back to a queer spat with David Brock.

Whatever his motivations, he is doing God’s work. That is the lesson we learn: that everyone ultimately reports to God, and if God wants to use a homosexual Jew to do his work, God will use a homosexual Jew to do his work.

Glenn’s latest piece on Substack is really too good to just pull quotes from. You have to read it in full. I will just quote the first six paragraphs, so that you are motived to go finish it over on Substack.

From the piece, entitled “The Journalistic Tattletale and Censorship Industry Suffers Several Well-Deserved Blows“:

A new and rapidly growing journalistic “beat” has arisen over the last several years that can best be described as an unholy mix of junior high hall-monitor tattling and Stasi-like citizen surveillance. It is half adolescent and half malevolent. Its primary objectives are control, censorship, and the destruction of reputations for fun and power. Though its epicenter is the largest corporate media outlets, it is the very antithesis of journalism.

I’ve written before about one particularly toxic strain of this authoritarian “reporting.” Teams of journalists at three of the most influential corporate media outlets — CNN’s “media reporters” (Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy), NBC’s “disinformation space unit” (Ben Collins and Brandy Zadrozny), and the tech reporters of The New York Times (Mike Isaac, Kevin Roose, Sheera Frenkel) — devote the bulk of their “journalism” to searching for online spaces where they believe speech and conduct rules are being violated, flagging them, and then pleading that punitive action be taken (banning, censorship, content regulation, after-school detention). These hall-monitor reporters are a major factor explaining why tech monopolies, which (for reasons of self-interest and ideology) never wanted the responsibility to censor, now do so with abandon and seemingly arbitrary blunt force: they are shamed by the world’s loudest media companies when they do not.

Just as the NSA is obsessed with ensuring there be no place on earth where humans can communicate free of their spying eyes and ears, these journalistic hall monitors cannot abide the idea that there can be any place on the internet where people are free to speak in ways they do not approve. Like some creepy informant for a state security apparatus, they spend their days trolling the depths of chat rooms and 4Chan bulletin boards and sub-Reddit threads and private communications apps to find anyone — influential or obscure — who is saying something they believe should be forbidden, and then use the corporate megaphones they did not build and could not have built but have been handed in order to silence and destroy anyone who dissents from the orthodoxies of their corporate managers or challenges their information hegemony.

Oliver Darcy has built his CNN career by sitting around with Brian Stelter petulantly pointing to people breaking the rules on social media and demanding tech executives make the rule-breakers disappear. The little crew of tattletale millennials assembled by NBC — who refer to their twerpy work with the self-glorifying title of “working in the disinformation space”: as intrepid and hazardous as exposing corruption by repressive regimes or reporting from war zones — spend their dreary days scrolling through 4Chan boards to expose the offensive memes and bad words used by transgressive adolescents; they then pat themselves on the back for confronting dangerous power centers, even when it is nothing more trivial and bullying than doxxing the identities of powerless, obscure citizens.

But the worst of this triumvirate is the NYT’s tech reporters, due to influence and reach if no other reason. When Silicon Valley monopolies, publicly pressured by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and other lawmakers, united to remove Parler from the internet, the Times’ tech team quickly donned their hall-monitor goggles and Stasi notebooks to warn that the Bad People had migrated to Signal and Telegram. This week they asked: “Are Private Messaging Apps the Next Misinformation Hot Spot?” One reporter “confess[ed] that I am worried about Telegram. Other than private messaging, people love to use Telegram for group chats — up to 200,000 people can meet inside a Telegram chat room. That seems problematic.”

These examples of journalism being abused to demand censorship of spaces they cannot control are too numerous to comprehensively chronicle. And they are not confined to those three outlets. That far more robust censorship is urgently needed is now a virtual consensus in mainstream corporate journalism: it’s an animating cause for them.

Go read the rest.

The single issue I take with this is that he misspells “doxing.”

Because I know some of you won’t go read it, I need to pull a couple more quotes:

  • “Thus do we have the unimaginably warped dynamic in which U.S. journalists are not the defenders of free speech values but the primary crusaders to destroy them.”
  • “So settling on this penny-ante, trivial bullshit — tattling, hall monitoring, speech policing: all in the most anti-intellectual, adolescent and primitive ways — is all they have. It’s all they are. It’s why they have fully earned the contempt and distrust in which the public holds them.”

And that’s a mic drop.

Of course, all he is saying is stuff I’ve been saying for four years. This is true. I’m sure like most or perhaps even all important people, he follows this site. But he’s got nothing to win by putting this out there, and ripping them to shreds. And that is what he has done. Every single journalist on the planet knows who Glenn Greenwald is. He’s the single most famous living journalist.

He just brutally and absolutely humiliated all of these pieces of shit. He went through and named and shamed them.

What he did to that sickening bitch Taylor Lorenz is the equivalent of ripping off a fat woman’s clothes on the street, throwing her in the mud, spitting in her face, and then zooming in on her fat rolls with a high definition camera and broadcasting it to every person on earth.

As a framing device for the larger issue of journalism having been transformed into a tattletale industrial complex, he tells the mind-numbing tale of how this Lorenz bitch snuck into a private chat on Clubhouse, after she’d already been blocked, and secretly recorded them, before falsely accusing Silicon Valley entrepreneur Marc Andreessen of using “the r-word” (that’s “retard,” by the way – you’re not allowed to say that anymore). Glenn explains that the accusation was false – it was someone else who said it, and they were quoting a third party from reddit – and the bitch was called out on it. Instead of apologizing and retracting, she said “thanks for clarifying” and then locked her account when people criticized her, pretending that she is herself the victim.

The only way Glenn could have hit her harder would be to photoshop her head onto that OG Nazi meme. But it’s cool – I got you Glenn. Feel free to share this in your next article, buddy:

Lorenz has now unlocked her account, and has some kind of special privilege they invented just for her where she gets to decide who can reply to her. They have literally made this belligerent, vindictive, hateful bitch above reproach. She cannot be questioned.

What kind of a person thinks that “journalists” should be beyond being questioned? Isn’t that the opposite of what a journalist should be?

But you cannot shame them.

These people do not have shame. They are all patting each other’s backs and jacking each other off in a circle as they hunt down the last free thinkers on planet earth to tell them what they can and can’t say. However, what Glenn has done is make this “Tattletale Industrial Complex” radioactive. These people are now officially the lowest of the low. Other journalists, and professionals of any kind, perhaps even their own family members, are now going to be ashamed to be seen with them in public.

Anyone who has any association with the industry at all will have seen these tweets, which Glenn included in his article:

That right there sums it all up. What these people are doing has absolutely nothing to do with the public interest. They are mercenaries working for a corrupt establishment run by billionaire oligarchs who control the population through regulating what they are allowed to think.

There can no longer be a pretense in the professional world of words that it is somehow fashionable to be the scum-sucking internet hall monitor. Everyone now knows what these people are: they are morbidly deranged sadists who are too cowardly to become real serial killers.

The Daily Mail put these people on a wall of shame.

Notably, few of these reporters are Jewish. Especially if you compare it to the average percentage of Jews in the journalism industry in total. Of the eight names Glenn featured, there on the wall of shame, the only one that is confirmed as Jewish is Frenkel, who is clearly some kind of brown person (I don’t think she’s Sephardic, she looks like a Jewlatto). She worked at BuzzFeed, and got bumped up to the New York Times to do this Stasi witch-hunt.

Why are there so few Jews? Well, it’s obvious: Jews know how humiliating this work is. When I was on the cover of The Atlantic, that almost entirely Jewish publication brought in a temporary non-Jew from Huffington Post to write the story, because none of them wanted their names attached to it.

I talk to a lot of people through encrypted messaging apps. People that everyone knows, including a lot of leftists. All of Washington, Silicon Valley and New York know that I have the most zipped lips on earth, so surprising people contact me. Some interrogate me on specific topics, some want to ask my opinion on things that happen with stuff. I like to be as helpful as possible to people who have influence. I have never talked to anyone in academia, the tech industry, journalism or whatever, who thinks what the censorship complex is doing is good. It always comes up because of what happened to me. Everyone believes that censorship and thought-policing is bad for society. Anyone with a thinking brain knows that. I cannot tell you how many times I have heard the sentence: “didn’t millennials read 1984 in high school?”

The reason that no one speaks out is the obvious reason: people are afraid. I always say, “well, you could write or say a general thing in defense of freedom of speech on principle, without saying anything specific.” They all reply something to the effect of: “that would just make me a target. For the rest of my life I’ll have these people after me.”

Indeed, Glenn tells the story of New York Times journalist Donald McNeil, who was recently crucified for saying “the n-word” (the word is “nigger”) in the context of discussing the harm that saying that word causes while on a high school field trip in Peru.

Everyone is on constant alert already, and speaking out against these people just draws their attention. They are soulless monsters, fixated on power. People who have accomplished nothing in their lives, these failed novelists, failed poets, failed comedians, failed whatevers are, via this tattletale mercenary work, able to exercise the power to destroy the lives of people who have accomplished things. As stated above, it is akin to serial killing, but along with being more cowardly, it is also more sadistic.

A serial killer can take your life. He can even torture you before he does so. But he can’t take away what you’ve done in your life. He can’t destroy your reputation and accomplishments. But a tattletale “journalist” can erase a man. Donald McNeil is not someone I particularly admired, but he was a real journalist in that he went around the world and interviewed people and tried to find out what was going on. He started working at the Times in 1976, wrote some things he would have liked to be remembered for I’m sure, if only as a citation in a footnote. But now, his entire life is “the nigger guy.”

There wasn’t much new to me in Glenn’s article, and I felt like I was reading myself (if I had time to proofread my own work over the course of an entire day instead of writing 10,000+ words a day that don’t get proofread). But because of who Glenn is, and how surgical this article was, this is the piece that will define the year 2021: the year of the tattletale.

Many people feel like this speech police apparatus has been implemented overnight. They feel that we went from being a relatively free society, to a society where people are jailed for memes and hunted down by journalists in private chat rooms for saying banned words. We know that it didn’t happen overnight – it started right here at the Daily Stormer, when journalists and the entire tech industry colluded to remove me from the internet in 2017. Ostensibly, this attempt to unperson me was a response to jokes I made about a morbidly obese woman who died of a heart attack during the Antifa attack on the peaceful Charlottesville rally of August 11th of that year.

At that time, I was targeted by the entire media, which conspired against me. Also at that time, the Daily Stormer was among the most visited alternative news websites. We were competing with Breitbart and Infowars, and if it wouldn’t have been for the unprecedented censorship, I would now be competing with the New York Times and CNN. They knew that, and that is why they released the hounds. Furthermore, if I wouldn’t have been banned, the coronavirus hoax wouldn’t have happened, and Donald Trump would have won the election.

They’re going big time now. This is no longer just political censorship. Now, you can be censored for “disinformation,” which means “disagreeing with the media at all.”

The agenda is to somehow silence half of the population of the United States. They obviously can’t single them all out for humiliation, professional destruction and prison, so they are going to freeze targets, personalize them, and make examples of them. This is called “a chilling effect,” and it is the current core plan of the ruling class to maintain control over a population that views them as illegitimate masters.

Glenn Greenwald’s exposé of these trash pickers is not going to change the course of history, but it points a light on what is happening in this country, so as no one involved can later claim that they didn’t know what was going on.

Eighty years from now, 100-year-old CNN interns will be dragged in front of courts and put on trial for the role they played in destroying free speech on the internet.

Finally, I just want to make a personal note: I’ve been writing on this website every single day for nearly 8 years. During this time, the punishment that I have suffered has gone much deeper than the censorship. These people have threatened and harassed my family, and friends that I haven’t seen in over a decade. My finances were obviously destroyed, and I’ve been bullied by intelligence agencies. That’s what I got for pushing back against the power. But here is what I know: I created something that was powerful enough for the most powerful people to take note of it. I worked, and I created something that mattered.

These journalists are not simply tools of the ruling elite, enforcers of a bizarre set of ever-shifting rules about what you are allowed to think, and they are not simply anti-intellectual witch-hunters lashing out at things they can’t hope to understand. It is deeper than that. These odious fiends are fundamentally destroyers of creativity. They seek to smash the imaginative spiritual energy inside of men, that piece of God that was breathed into us. What they are seeking is to create what effectively amounts to a blank world, free from any form of diversity whatsoever.

They are the embodiment of evil.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 309 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Joel Ryan says:

    “He might be a homosexual Jew” is one of the stupidest opening sentences I’ve ever seen. The religious BS in the fourth paragraph further adds to the perception that this writer needs remedial help. Maybe there’s some satiric commentary there regarding Nazis killing both Jews and gays. If Mr. Anglin is trying to be edgy, or comically factual, it falls flat and comes across as juvenile and bigoted.

  2. jsinton says:

    On the obsession with “homosexual Jew”… Get a life. A true Christian knows “Judge not and ye shall not be judged”. Stick to the issue. Greenwald focuses on truth. He’s a true journalist. Who cares what he does with his johnson.

  3. he is doing God’s work

    I agree 100%. Greenwald is great. Here is 10-minutes of him on Jimmy Dore’s show blasting censorship and criticizing Israel.

    • Thanks: Richard B, moi, Nancy, Agent76
    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
    , @JM
  4. geokat62 says:

    The single issue I take with this is that he misspells “doxing.”

    Excerpt from Doxing and doxxing:

    Doxing is the act of publishing private information and identifying information about an individual online with intent to harm. Doxing is done in order to shame someone, encourage other online users to intimidate someone, or put the person being doxed in actual danger. Doxing may be spelled with two “x‘s”, as in doxxing.

    https://grammarist.com/new-words/doxing-and-doxxing/

    • Replies: @mikemikev
    , @FoSquare
  5. And why is all this? Because ANY truth thrown in the face of a public lie is a threat to the BIG LIE, COVID.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  6. Not too great but there are some good points here and there.

    • Agree: Realist
  7. Biff says:

    While I agree with the premise of the article, I mostly agree with comment #1.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Disagree: Emslander
  8. Three of the first four comments here are why the world is no longer fun.

    Lorenz has now unlocked her account, and has some kind of special privilege they invented just for her where she gets to decide who can reply to her. They have literally made this belligerent, vindictive, hateful bitch above reproach. She cannot be questioned.

    Bill Gates also enjoys this privilege.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  9. lloyd says: • Website

    The language of the new censorship has a certain prissiness and lack of objectivity about it that recalls Women’s Commons room. That is the one aspect of it that even Andrew seems to avoid. As the new censors say, they are always on the look out for dog whistles. Old style Communism and its adversaries were still preenimently white male crusades although plenty of women made themselves martyrs for it. Lewis Carrol with his Queens in his Alice stories and C S Lewis with his white witch in his first Narnia story both imagined dystopias that seem to most fit this era.

    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
    , @lloyd
  10. anon[405] • Disclaimer says:

    “Eighty years from now, 100-year-old CNN interns will be dragged in front of courts and put on trial for the role they played in destroying free speech on the internet.”

    Best sentence so for for 2021.

  11. SND says:

    Ron Unz is so naughty! He’s purposely burdening poor Glenn Greenwald with Andrew Anglin & The Daily Stormer’s unqualified praise. Broadcast it, baby! Now Glenn gets to spend all his time defending himself from this ultimate guilt by association charge. Ha ha ha. Good thing Greenwald loves to get down in just that kind of fight. Popcorn, please!

    • Replies: @Abbybwood
  12. Hammer says:
    @Joel Ryan

    Man. Either the first 2 comments are trolls, or they are the subversives from intelligence agencies that “don’t exist.”

    • Troll: Realist
  13. @Joel Ryan

    Greenwald is a hero, period. Thx.

    • Agree: moi, Joseph Doaks
  14. Icy Blast says:
    @Joel Ryan

    Are you actually Brian Stelter?

    • LOL: Schuetze
  15. Icy Blast says:

    Whenever I see a photograph of Brian Stelter, I think of Lavrenty Beria for some reason.

  16. @Joel Ryan

    ‘He might be a homosexual Jew’ is not stupid at all. Anglin is a nationalist and homosexual Jews are not normally the favorite people of nationalists. Yet Anglin praises Greenwald’s courage to tell the Truth and his accurate aim in hitting the target. Your objection to Anglin calling Greenwald ‘unrepentant’ for his gayness strikes at the very issue under consideration. Freedom of Speech means we can criticize each other’s choices but we cannot silence each other. And it appears you want Anglin silenced by sending him back for remedial education.

    • Agree: chris, Stan d Mute
  17. Dumbo says:

    I liked this article. Anglin has grown up somewhat. Did he convert? I don’t remember him writing like this before. I never liked Greenwald, but I respect him much more now. At least he’s not a paid hack like so many (all?) others.

  18. Rahan says:

    Many people feel like this speech police apparatus has been implemented overnight. They feel that we went from being a relatively free society, to a society where people are jailed for memes and hunted down by journalists in private chat rooms for saying banned words. 

    On a larger scale, this substitution is taking place via a process of moving from “constraints A” to “constraints B”, with an intermediate period of loosening of constraints. A temporary “near total freedom”, which peaked circa 2000 – 2010 mostly, before going into decline.

    As was with race. At first, one was supposed to view people as individuals, and view them in a color-blind manner. Today, viewing people as individuals in a color-blind manner is already defined as “racist” by GloboHomo, and we’re back to mandatory viewing of people through a racial group filter, but not the old “filter A”, but a new “filter B”.

    Race used to be a “social construct”, as did gender, but now both are again being presented as manifestations of a transcendental reality, only a redefined one.

    Like with sexuality. Everybody screwing everybody turned out to be a temporary transition from “fascism A” to “fascism B”, and now this transition is over and there are even more rules and traps in the mating ritual, than back in the 19th century.

    And gender and fetish-wise, people are now “born this way”, sometimes “into the wrong body”, as society has regressed all the way to bronze-age metaphysics. But use modern tech to enforce them.

    Same with censorship. For a number of decades there was less and less censorship, in the west, then this temporary period of freedom peaked, and now it’s also all regressing back to 19th century levels of censorship, but through a new filter, applied by the new hidden elites.

    Another excellent gas-lighting misdirection by GloboHomo—those normal liberals who want back the political and lifestyle freedoms of the 1990s are “the fascists”. Bravo. Just like every time urban blacks with illegal pistols chimpout, this means it’s all the fault of white peasants with legal rifles.

    The autogenophylia mental-beakdown-promoting sissy hypno porn of today also works like this. First it promises “infinite pleasure and freedom” by deconstructing the vulnerable user’s current personality, and then after this transitional freedom from restrictions and resulting waves of dopamine, starts building up forcefully new structures, even more rigid than the initial ones, thus producing a new artificial personality. Thus a mostly functional depressed autist is first dismantled, and then reconstructed by a computer program into a psycho who maintains a permanent manic phase through relentless use of drugs and dildo riding, and if during the inevitable depressive crash he off himself—then this is simply proof how fascist this cruel world is. Kek.

    **

    The larger misdirection: who are the elites and what is the system? Apparently the institutional, corporate, creative, academic, and media components of the system are all constantly fighting the system. Neither Harvard, nor Google, nor Parliament, nor ministers, nor governors, nor CNN, nor NYT, nor CNBC, nor the mayor, nor the chief of FBI are “the system, no, they are all in fact “fighting the system”. Who is them this mysterious system? Why, it’s the white provincial. He is “the system” somehow, and everything is his fault. And after you finally put this filthy kulak in his place (or “deprogram” him from his fascism), then the injustices and inefficiencies of life will evaporate.

    The larger transitional freedom phase: In a sense WWI was the culmination of the dismantling of the old “king-and-aristocracy” based world order. This was followed by a period in which “all sane people” promoted democracy based on transparency of institutions, rotation of elites through fair elections, freedom of speech, all that jazz. Now, however, a new layer of unelected elites has taken the place of the old pre-WWI unelected elites, with all that entails. The 20th century was to a large extent a larger transitional phase of temporary freedom from “rigidity A” to “rigidity B”, with many smaller cycles taking places, especially after WWII.

    **

    Everyone is on constant alert already, and speaking out against these people just draws their attention. They are soulless monsters, fixated on power. People who have accomplished nothing in their lives, these failed novelists, failed poets, failed comedians, failed whatevers are, via this tattletale mercenary work, able to exercise the power to destroy the lives of people who have accomplished things.

    Back in Soviet times if one is a dissident this is impossible, thus one is either a) clinically insane, or b) a foreign agent, or c) a domestic terrorist. At certain times it was more fashionable to label people foreign agents, in others—insane psychos.

    To this day people get lost in the cloud of bullshit how “private censorship” is OK and “state censorship” isn’t (although in places like the UK and Canada the distinction is already mostly imaginary). Like with any cloud of bullshit, you just take a step back and look at the facts, and do not allow GloboHomo to change definitions and descriptions.

    You take a step back, and from outside the cloud of bullshit you ask: “Can a person tell off-color jokes and state their political or religious values in this country without being censored and punished? Yes or no? No but no if. Yes or no?” If the answer is yes, then this is a free society. If the answer is no, then this is not a free society, and it doesn’t matter in the least what mechanisms the system uses to achieve this un-freedom–”private” institutions or “state” institutions, “hired bullies”, or “activist volunteers”.

    Lesson 1: private companies above a certain size become political actors. They should be treated as such. Possibly defined by a mix of variable including annual profits, budget, reach, direct and indirect employee number. Those definitions should be anchored by the state and reviewed say once a decade.
    Lesson 2: private companies have the right to enforce dress, speech, and behavior codes inside their offices, within reason. They cannot have the right to enforce the same when their workers are not at work, and certainly can’t be allowed to punish workers for how they dressed or talked when not at work.
    Lesson 2a: private companies should have the state-protected right to refuse service in non-essentials (who to bake a cake for), but not have the right to refuse essentials (staple foods, electricity, water, banking). What is essential and non-essential should be decided via public debate and anchored to specific rules about once a decade.
    Lesson 3: the right to freely expressing political opinion must be recognized as a basic human right protected by national and international law. It is not a privilege, it is a right. If it is not a right, then this is not a democracy, or even a modern civilization, but actual neo-feudalism.

    **

    Jesters like Trump and Farage, God bless them, forced the new system to stop with the pretense, and shift from the slow boil to high speed, so that every sane person could finally also stop pretending and accept what is taking place.

    Now the new elites-not elites finally stopped also pretending that the masses are “citizens” and began treating them for real like “dumb filthy serfs”.
     
    Did you really think you can just simply vote any way you want to?
    Did you really think you can just simply say what you want to say?
    Did you really think you can just simply have freedom of faith and morals?
    Did you really think you can just simply protest in front of Parliament?
    Did you really think that constitutional mechanisms will simply remain functional?
    Did you really think the media will just simply be neutral and truthful?
    Did you really think you can just simply tell any joke you want?
    Did you really think you can just simply remain middle class with normal incomes and private property?
    Did you really think the police will just simply protect you from looters and arsonists?
    Did you really think you can just simply defend yourself if the police doesn’t interfere?
    Did you really think you can just simply decide what is democratic and what isn’t and what state institutions can and can’t do?
    Did you really think you can just simply decide what is and what isn’t a monopoly, and what corporations can and can’t do?
    Did you really think you can just simply get to have a say in how much money we’ll print and which businesses get to be propped up?
    Did you really think you can just simply have a say in what gets taught in schools? 
    Did you really think you can just simply have your kids not snitch on you to the authorities? 
    Did you really think you can just simply decide which medications to take and which not to take?

    **

    They’re going big time now. This is no longer just political censorship. Now, you can be censored for “disinformation,” which means “disagreeing with the media at all.”

    This moving of goalposts and renaming things is a very important part of GloboHomo’s instrumentarium.

    Moving goalposts: (especially in terms of various “minorities”) from “we are totally like you let us have equal rights” to “you’re the pathological ones, now we get to control your life”.
    Changing names and meanings: especially terms like “fascism”, “racism”, “terrorism”, “hate”, “radical”, “rape”, “abuse” and such, and constant fluidity of what these terms mean is not harmless, far from it.

    Because once the branders brand you as one of those, the system reacts as a whole to punish you. Once definitions are not anchored, but constantly reinterpreted by the modern equivalent of self-appointed “Old Testament judges”, you’ve just lost your civilization. They’ll even define what is a political opinion or religious belief and what is “unhinged hate”, and the system will react to you according to their definition.

    Lesson: any sane society must have a) anchored major goalposts that can only be changed through referendum; b) must have language purity rules and laws that do not allow definitions to be changed willy-nilly, and those who do are shamed and fined. Any change in definition must be debated and approved by some body such as a national academy of science.

    The agenda is to somehow silence half of the population of the United States. They obviously can’t single them all out for humiliation, professional destruction and prison, so they are going to freeze targets, personalize them, and make examples of them. This is called “a chilling effect,” and it is the current core plan of the ruling class to maintain control over a population that views them as illegitimate masters.

    Hopefully this produces the effect of them being increasingly seen as just “a dangerous part of life”, a permanent external irritant that exists on the spectrum from “annoying” to “lethal”. Thus in turn means a total loss of any moral authority they may have wielded even just 5 years ago, so that’s go.

    Let’s hope they have not succeeded in poisoning culture to the extent of the inevitable reaction backlash actually being fashy.

    These journalists are not simply tools of the ruling elite, enforcers of a bizarre set of ever-shifting rules about what you are allowed to think, and they are not simply anti-intellectual witch-hunters lashing out at things they can’t hope to understand. It is deeper than that. These odious fiends are fundamentally destroyers of creativity. They seek to smash the imaginative spiritual energy inside of men, that piece of God that was breathed into us.

    This is also why you matter, Mr. Wang Lin. Your stuff is so real it instantly becomes alive, and becomes part of the noosphere. Whereas they are servant of death and cannot create. On a wider scale, this is why every institution they touch collapses. They cannot create their own institutions—they can merely infiltrate existing ones and kill them from the inside.
    On a more narrow scale, this is what they do with the media environment as well.

    Which is also why the new dopamine freedoms they promote come at the expense of older traditional liberties. Again, it’s a cannibalizing effect. They are not creating additional stuff. They simply substituting stuff, narrowing choice and freedoms, while pretending to be expanding them.

    Lesson 1: Freedoms—when you promote certain freedoms, do they expand the existing pool or liberties, or do they come at the price of extinguishing older liberties. If the new freedoms you promote expand the overall pool of liberties, you are helping the traditional democratic socium survive and evolve. If the new freedoms you promote come at the price of extinguishing older liberties, then you are a destroyer who pretends to be a creator.

    Lesson 2: Institutions—if when promoting new rights, freedoms, and identities, you are capable of building new institutions for them, and these institutions mesh in a positive manner with the pre-existing institutions of your society—you are a builder and a force for good. If, however, you an only infiltrate and overtake already existing institutions in order to promote your new rights, freedoms, and identities, or your attempts to build new institutions come into conflict with preexisting ones—you are a destroyer.

    Do you add, or do you subtract? Did life become more free or less free because of your actions? Do you build or do you destroy? Are you a dopamine-addicted slave of chaos, or are you capable of enjoying the pleasures of life while also being a builder?

    **

    Anyway, thank you for doing what you do, Mr. Wang Lin.

    Back when in the days of your high-octane performance art persona that attempted to counteract through shock-humor the overtone window hijacking by GloboHomo, the humorless malignant drama whores couldn’t tell when you’re serious and when not, or perhaps they pretended to not being able to tell.

    Today, with the outrageous clownish persona toned down into mildly edgy deadpan mode, the saner adults start not being able to tell what’s what.

    But those of us who can tell salute you.

  19. Ghali says:

    Any one knows (for sure) Greenwald’s opinion and attitude towards the Palestinian people who are being persecuted, ethnically cleansed and starved to death by his fellow Jews?

  20. That frog gave me headache.

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  21. Dumbo says:
    @jsinton

    According to Christianity (and most religions, really, even Judaism), homosexuality is a serious sin. In more scientific terms, it’s associated with a lot of behaviours that are not very healthy or good for you. Of course, being probably genetic, there’s not much gays can do about it except being celibate. Which might be the best option, psychologically.

    I don’t think Greenwald does much with his johnson, I think he’s the passive one. Still, a good journalist with integrity. I am actually surprised.

  22. Richard B says:

    If they’re trolling the Internet to bully, dox and destroy people who run websites, or contribute content, etc. then why haven’t they gone after The Unz Review?

    Leaving that question aside…

    “So settling on this penny-ante, trivial bullshit — tattling, hall monitoring, speech policing: all in the most anti-intellectual, adolescent and primitive ways — is all they have. It’s all they are. It’s why they have fully earned the contempt and distrust in which the public holds them.”

    It’s also why the institutions they and those who think like them control won’t last.

    With social institutions come problems, with problems comes problem-solving, with problem-solving comes a set of skills that these child-people do not have. Unfortunately, neither do a lot of people who complain about them.

    They’re all deposits of Dunning-Kruger Nation.

    Not to underestimate the damage they can do, especially since it seems to be the only thing they’re capable of, but the fact is, the best they’ll ever manage is a Pyrrhic Victory.

    So, let’s call this The Pyrrhic Victory of Dunning-Kruger Nation.

  23. Richard B says:
    @Joel Ryan

    Good comment and great article from Greenwald. It’s always good to see him on Tucker.

    I mean on Tucker’s show.

    • LOL: Niebelheim, Trinity, Thim
  24. Jiminy says:

    I don’t like how he’s going to strip down the fat lady. My wife’s got big bones, and I know if she saw that paragraph , she belt the bejesus out of me. Just to prove a point. And as for pillow biters, my only fear is that they make it compulsory. We’ll all have funny looks on our faces then.

    • LOL: Twodees Partain
    • Replies: @Che Guava
  25. Joel Ryan: “The religious BS in the fourth paragraph …”

    I agree. It appears Anglin has been fatally infected with the lethal mind virus of Christianity. It’s probably only a matter of time before he realizes that he can’t serve two masters, and renounces his racist beliefs to please the race-mixing Prince of Peace, the God of Love. Sooner or later he’ll turn up on a Jerry Springer-type show, telling anyone who will listen that he used to be a hater until Jesus showed him that loving Jews and negroes is a better way to go.

    It’s too bad that he spoils his prose with these lapses into preachy treacle. He’s got a lively writing style, and I find him perceptive about many things, but this sort of stuff is really intolerable. The worst part about it is that it blinds him to Christianity’s preeminent role in the destruction of the white race.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • LOL: Hans
  26. @Joel Ryan

    If Mr. Anglin is trying to be edgy, or comically factual, it falls flat and comes across as juvenile and bigoted.

    You sound rather edgy yourself, deary. Did Mr. Anglin really spill some bigotry on your sheets, or is that something left over from last night’s hopefully non-juvenile pursuit of same-sex happiness? Be it remembered your mask when worn up over the eyes also protects you from the dangerous spatter of visual BS and religious words.

    I do agree how “He may be a homosexual jew” may be one of the stupidest opening sentences only because those words have been joined at the hip for years and are completely worn-out from overuse. What form of “remedial help” are you offering Mr. Anglin, maybe a Yiddish primer on poopoo prose for all occasions?

    Glenn Greenwald don’t go where the truth ain’t. His truth is unvarnished, and like it or not, he discusses it. Anglin doesn’t hold anything back either. So why not consider maybe entering the voir dire of things, instead of sitting outside the courthouse and simply heckling the participants for their use of flat and unvarnished facts?

  27. So good to see Anglin at Unz.com again. Hope he becomes a regular here!

  28. @jsinton

    Not just gay and Jewish, Greenwald was also one of the predominantly Jewish US entrepreneurs selling pornography, of the gay variety, ‘hairystuds’ apparently, in his past careers

    But indeed that’s just a curiosity … more significantly, it is not true that Greenwald “focuses on truth”. Greenwald hoaxed one of the largest media frauds of the previous decade, as well as other failings – ironically, ‘constitutional lawyer’ Greenwald had been in some trouble for invading people’s privacy – And innocent people have gone to jail trusting in faker Greenwald

    Greenwald is a tool who has worked in turn for three deep-state billionaire families, those of Bill Gates, the Rothschilds, and then Pierre Omidyar

    His leg-up to fame was in the early stages of the oligarchy deploying the ‘Edward Snowden’ game … Mr ‘Snowden’, it was claimed, first ‘leaked’ to Bart Gellman, the good friend and biographer of no less than Dick Cheney, at the CIA-tied Washington Post … whilst Zbig Brzezinski’s daughter Mika pumped the story on telly

    Then they realised that was all too fake … so they shifted the story of Snowden ‘leaking’ to fake ‘brave Jewish journalist’ Greenwald, working under the Rothschild operatives on the board of the UK Guardian … Greenwald replaying the role of ‘brave Jewish journalist’ Carl Bernstein, who partnered with US Navy intelligence officer Bob Woodward, on the fake ‘leaking of Deep Throat’ in Watergate, the ‘Silent Coup’ run by Woodward’s Navy boss Admiral Maurer, Joint Chiefs head

    As a fake ‘constitutional lawyer’ Greenwald always served oligarch masters, refusing to run stories on legal corruption, even tho one of those stories – US Virginia federal judge bribery involving Robert Mueller, that led Bill Barr to order the wind-down of Mueller’s anti-Trump forays – that file, having helped block other extraditions, would make impossible the extradition of Edward Snowden … the file in the hands of UK Judge Baraitser when she ordered blocking Assange’s extradition –
    More here:
    https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/11/assange-snowden-rat-traps.html
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/09/21/russia-govt-report-snowden-greenwald-are-cia-frauds/

  29. Rocha says:

    Greenwald is the most vociferous supporter of the most corrupt government in Brazilian history, that of Lula and the Brazilian Labour party who are very adept at Stalinist tactics and misinformation campaigns. He has no credibility as far as I’m concerned.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  30. BlackFlag says:

    So Greenwald would agree with Yarvin that the force behind big tech censorship is the legacy media rather than from woke acolytes within the tech companies although those do exist and make the tech companies more amendable to complying.

  31. @jsinton

    On your obession with alternative facts … How do you survive the real facts of life?

    If a guy points a gun at others, do you jump in and say “Judge Not ….forsooth!!”

    The issue is homosexuality pointed at society and at your children, with the heterosexuals as the breeders who supply prey to homosexuals. Oh, but let’s not “judge” that. Very intolerant.

    You are an absolutely clueless armchair “christian” who twists the words of the bible for purposes of your own virtue signalling. By this you obtain the right to say . . . the queers love me because I refrain from exercising any judgment on what they are, much less their intentions for society in general–if not my child in particular.

    From the Hammurabi code, from Roman law, there was no such thing as a criminal judgment imposed in the absence of a corresponding punishment attached. Hence, the Son of God was NOT saying, “Do not exercise personal judgment for your own purposes of discernment” Rather, He was saying do not impose punishment on others for their beliefs. He was real clear in saying the law of Moses remained intact, and that God will avenge and mete out real punishment for every idle word spoken by others, much less every evil belief they impose on others in the name of “tolerance” and “who cares what he does with his johnson”.

    Be sure and tell your child it will only hurt his rectum for a while, and will thereafter become a life of insatiable sexual depravity, Or as Tchaikovsky said of his own sexual entrapment, “it is suicide committed daily.” These guys advocate putting their tongue and sexual orgains into the poo poo. Dogs, on the other hand, only lick their own asses.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
  32. GeeBee says:
    @jsinton

    While I understand your defence of homosexuals, I would point out two things. First, Andrew Anglin has a terse wit, and one must always read him in the light of his tongue being firmly in his cheek. Second, it is undoubtedly the case that sexual perversion and dysphoria are today deliberately employed in order to spread confusion and to undermine society, and we should all be at least aware of the cynicism with which this deleterious project is being conducted.

    One should also ask, however, what kind of a philosophy for functioning, coherent human societies is “Judge not and ye shall not be judged”? Although it is not immediately apparent, it is none the less true that it is this defining characteristic of Christian axiology that lies at the heart of the collapse of Western civilisation. You don’t have to have read Nietzsche to grasp that any credo espousing such nonsense is doomed from the outset. Quite apart from the fact that those of us with any vestige of reason and evidence know that there is no “judgement” awaiting us after death, and thus, any strictures adjuring us to act in certain ways in order to avoid this non-existent post-mortem analysis are intellectually redundant, there is the small matter of that most revolting sect, the Puritans, who were very much in favour of carrying just such ‘judgement’ of their own upon each and every infraction of their monstrous, life-denying, bigoted worldview, and meting out the most sickening and cruel punishments attendant upon their judgement.

    And it is apt to cite the Puritans of seventeenth century England and of New England, because what are the ‘tattlers’ of whom Greenwald writes and whom Anglin lampoons if not latter-day Puritans?

    • Replies: @Mark.
  33. AA isn’t against censorship on principle – he’s always urging Russia, China, Myanmar, etc. to ban the Internet. It’s a propaganda war out there so someone’s gonna ban somebody sometime.

  34. Felicity says:

    Glad that Greenwald called them all out. A very enjoyable read. Now we must pray that he stops being a pervert, committing that sin which cries to heaven for vengeance. I shudder to think of it. May God have mercy on us all. Well done, Andre.

    • Replies: @Jimmy-McBee
  35. Levtraro says:

    Thanks for pointing to Greenwald’s article. I’ve just one editorial comment. You may re-think approvingly putting a picture and quote by George Orwell in a piece about tattletales. Near the end of his life, Orwell was a snitch for the UK gov’t, giving names of suspected wrong-thinkers along with their possibly embarrasing habits or tendencies to an agent of a semi-secret UK office dealing with disinformation and propaganda. He also offered (to a NY commie magazine) making another list of names of suspected rightists that would go to the Nazi side in the case of England being conquered by Nazi Germany. So he offered to snitch not only about leftists to the UK gov’t but also about rightists to commie organs. His novels were quite imaginative but his character left much to be desired, especially at old age.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    , @nsa
  36. Shamil says:

    I am an American Muslim who left the US and relocated to a Muslim country 2 years ago because my daughter’s(1st grade) school in Bay Area California thought it was a good idea to have a transgender activist visit children that young and introduce them to non binary genders. I had enough with that BS and within a month I was out of the country. I put up with the Patriotic Act, I put up with “random” pat downs and 5 hour detentions at the airport. But I won’t put up with calling an apple orange. Now that I am in this Muslim country free from all that BS transgender/BLM/Zionism/Satanism, I only regret why I didn’t do this earlier. Yes, I witness poverty, coffee is not that great, clean parks are limited, pollution is a daily reality…..but guess what, I am happier! My kids get to experience normal childhood. They know what a male is and what a female is and what are their responsibilities, rights and obligations. In line with thousands of years of civilization.
    Recently, their school started a PenPal project where our kids interact with British and American kids and talk about human rights, robotics, fake news, and human dignity. I kid you not. I didn’t want any of that crap. I know behind these slogans is a Soros or an Omidyar. I visited the principal of school and told her about my concerns about this project. I escaped America for my kids only to have them interact with the brianwashed American kids virtually!!! While my kids are not attending the project but it’s clear that the elites want the entire world to sing the new hymns of morality and ethics. Their influence and reach is truly global. The education ministers of these third world counties are in their pay rolls so it’s not that hard to introduce whatever measure they please.
    My prayers and wishes go to all Western parents who have to deal with the challenges of saving their children from the clutches of these Kabbalah Satanists!!
    I know there are many fronts and battles to choose in this war. But nothing can be more loftier and practically satisfying then saving the children from their traps.

  37. Miro23 says:

    From Greenwald’s fine article ref. the “n” word (nigger):

    The same stunted mentality just resulted in the destruction of the career and reputation of Lorenz’s far more accomplished colleague, science reporter Donald McNeil. On a 2019 field trip for rich high school kids to Peru, he used the “n-word” after a student asked him whether he thought it was fair that one of her classmates was punished for having used it in a video. McNeil used it not with malice or as a racist insult but to inquire about the facts of the video so he could answer the student’s question.

    After New York Times senior editors — including African-American editor-in-chief Dean Baquet — investigated and concluded that “only” a reprimand was appropriate — “it did not appear to me that his intentions were hateful or malicious,” said Baquet — dozens of McNeil’s colleagues wrote a furious letter demanding far more severe punishment. “Our community is outraged and in pain,” said the 150 Times employee-signatories, adding: “intent is irrelevant.” Intent is irrelevant when judging how harshly to punish this storied journalist for uttering this word.

    They got what they wanted. McNeil wrote a grovelling, abject apology, and then the Times announced he was gone from his job after forty-five years with the paper…

    So what even if he had used the “nigger” word maliciously – the MSM are engaged in a constant barrage of anti-white racism, encouraging physical violence against whites (they deserve it – so they’re getting it).

    Or what about the current target, singer Morgan Wallen (top of the Billboard 200 – Most Sold Albums). He’s been taken off all major radio stations, had his music delisted by Spotify, Apple etc. His recording contract suspended (Big Loud Records) with their distributor Republic Records saying,

    “We fully supports Big Loud’s decision and agrees such behavior will not be tolerated.”

    And TV. For example CMT TV:

    “We do not tolerate or condone words and actions that are in direct opposition to our core values that celebrate diversity, equity & inclusion,”

    Wallens problem is that he makes music and videos about white teenagers having fun together with no LGBT/ rappers/ sleaze/ porn in sight. There are sometimes even illusions to Christianity (!!):

    Also he’s a nice guy:

    What was the supposed crime? Here it is:

    • Thanks: Peripatetic Itch
  38. Schuetze says:

    Andrew Anglin is one of the wittiest journalists on the planet, and he is 100% correct when he claims that is why dailystormer had to die, at least in the eyes of the kabbalists. He also creates great memes, as this article illustrates (I love the “Why do they persecute me so”). On dailystormer during the good old days they used to have a “memetic Monday” article that had some of the best, and certainly edgiest, memes from the past week.

    The comments section at Dailystormer also was great back in the day, but after World War Anglin it was forced into the dark web and only is accessible with the Tor browser. I just don’t go there.

    Ron Unz has had good things to say about Anglin too:

    The two “alt right” news sources I regularly read are Unz and The Daily Stormer. Andrew Anglin called this as a hoax in February, looks like he was right.

    Well, I happen to have my own “conspiracy theory” about what’s really going on behind the scenes of these controversies…

    That Anglin fellow seems like a pretty sharp guy and I used to regularly look at his website, though a great deal of the material is obviously over-the-top satire or performance art.

    My suggestion is for Ron Unz to put a blog stream on the side bar ala Steve Sailor or Paul Kersey. That way we could get a regular dose of Anglin’s best work, plus we would have a forum to discuss his provocative articles. At least we could be certain that Anglin won’t delete comments wily nily like the menstrual Sailer and Kersey do.

  39. cranc says:

    The day that Glenn Greenwald writes an extensive book detailing the role of highly organised, highly funded Jewish power groups buying up, blackmailing, spying on, censoring, or otherwise subverting the political culture of the United States for their own tribal interests, that is the day I will take him seriously as ‘an adversary of the establishment’.
    Critics need to first look in the mirror. The Greenwlads, the Blumenthals, the Goodmans, the Mates of the world, unless and until they (the more sucessful Leftwing Jewish journalists) can take a deep and uncompromising look at Jewish identity and its influence upon ‘the marketplace of ideas’ which shapes war, finance, media and politics, then I just take their views as rather superficial.
    Greenwald has been ploughing this furrow for well over a decade, but despite his fame and profile, what has the effect been, other than he has become rich and won some glitzy journalism awards ?

    • Thanks: Hans
    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  40. Schuetze says:

    What has happened to “journalism” is merely one of the yid Octopuses tentacles. These same purges have been going on in Hollywood for decades, just ask Mel Gibson or Marlon Brando. It is no wonder that the sewage flowing out of the “entertainment industry” has been become unwatcheable. Anyone want to stand up for Hollywood?

    It also happened to the Music industry where all the record studios were yid owned going back to the early days of “Rock and Roll”. Of course everyone reading this article would attest to what kind of feces the “music industry” produces now. Anyone care to defend what is now called “music”?

    What happened to pro-sports after all the franchises were bought up by the yids can be summarized by one word: “niggerization”. I certainly find pro-sports to be unwatcheable even if I block all the illuminati hogwash during commercial breaks. Anyone besides Sailer want to explain how great it is watching a bunch of blacks chimping-out on the playing field?

    Technology has also been judeafied, with all the major tech companies forced to move their IP and development centers to Eretz Israel. There is a constant stream of dot-indian and jew spokesmen and PR people who are sent to prove to whites how stupid they are, and the H1B visas are about a purge of white Christian engineers from all corners of the American economy. The owners of these corporations are also to a very high degree ashkenazi. Anyone want to talk about white privilege in Tech?

    Of course Tech’s sister, “science” has also long been a playground for God’s chosen yids.

    So along comes Glen Greenwald, the “good globo-homo jew”. Sorry, I’ll take Assange or Snowden any day. They cannot hide behind their jewish privilege like Greenwald. If Greenwald really wants to prove that he is a brave hero to the goy and defender of free speech then lets see him write articles telling the truth about the holocaust, the protocols, blood sacrifice and the “Nazis”.

    • Agree: Che Guava, Wally, Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @FoSquare
    , @FLgeezer
    , @Che Guava
  41. noname27 says: • Website
    @jsinton

    The sin of condoning is deemed far worse by God than the sin of the original sinner. In Truth YOU are a partaker in that sin having given it your blessing through your silence (tacit agreement) or not speaking out against it

    • Replies: @The Soft Parade
  42. noname27 says: • Website

    Anglin is 100% disinformation and/or controlled opposition. He banned me from his crap site years ago – pay him no heed.

    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
  43. “Eighty years from now, 100-year-old CNN interns will be dragged in front of courts and put on trial for the role they played in destroying free speech on the internet.”
    Do you think we might be just a little more sprightly ? Maybe it’s just me but I just can’t work myself up too much over the sins & crimes of 80 year olds…. That, & I’d actually like to be alive to see it…?

    • Replies: @Cauchemar du Singe
  44. Schuetze says:
    @Joel Ryan

    Good ol (((Joel))) gets his panties all in a bunch when Anglin mentions that Greewald disco dances at the front of the gay disco. Oy Vey.

    Here is (((Joel’s))) hero on emotionally retarded and sexually deviant transsexuals:

    “I’m open to a scientific consensus that develops hormonal and other medicinal protocols for how trans girls and women can fairly compete with CIS women in sporting competitions.”

    I think Joel is lashing out because he has a man crush on Greenwald. Either that or he wants to compete in women’s “sports”.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
  45. Schuetze says:
    @jsinton

    Homosexuality is a mental illness. Jewishness too. Greenwald is a poster child for what homosexuality and judaism do to a “mensch”. Here is proof directly from the article and his jewlatto fellating mouth:

    “That I was one of AOC’s first and most active supporters back in 2018 when she ran against incumbent Joe Crowley — when people like Reese and Boelhert had not even heard of her — and that I have defended her more times than I can count, while also criticizing her on occasion, obviously goes unmentioned and does not matter (for those asking why I supported her, I interviewed AOC during her primary run and she gave impressive answers now unrecognizable from her politics). ”

    Greenwald was “one of AOC’s first and most active supporters”. What a jerk.

  46. Levtraro says:
    @Shamil

    I am an American Muslim who left the US and relocated to a Muslim country 2 years ago because my daughter’s(1st grade) school in Bay Area California thought it was a good idea to have a transgender activist visit children that young and introduce them to non binary genders.

    Thanks for pointing out at least one good aspect of transgenderist activism.

    • Replies: @Shamil
  47. gotmituns says:

    He might be a homosexual Jew, but Glenn Greenwald is a legend and a hero
    —————————————————————————————
    “homosexual jew” precludes any idea of “legend and a hero” to all decent people.

  48. Z-man says:

    He might be a homosexual Jew, but Glenn Greenwald is a…

    I wouldn’t fawn over the guy so much but after getting to know him on Tucker Carlson yes, he’s a righteous Jew.
    Thanks for letting me know about the article, because I will probably never read it.
    Personal observations;
    Taylor Lorenz-cute even if she is a Jewess.
    Kevin Roose, Brandy, ‘Ben’ Collins, Isaac and Oliver Darcy, lol, that’s what you get when you let Jews intermarry with Gentiles. Darcy, a name that conjures up the product of a union of Keira Knightly with Mathew McFadyen but one gets the mongrel dog you see here. ROFL .

  49. Smith says:

    Andrew Anglin is a christian grifter, not to be trusted.

    I wonder why Unz entertains the likes of him here.

    • Replies: @Marckus
    , @Sam the Man
  50. The demon-eyed Inquisitor comes
    With blue-flamed torch and screeching drill,
    To rule with fear over muted drones,
    ever cowardly devil’s shill.

  51. Realist says:

    I would even say he’s better than Tucker Carlson, because Tucker Carlson, wittingly or not, puts out State Department and Israeli government propaganda about China.

    Excellent observation. But to me, there is no question about Carlson’s motive…he is a willing China basher. He is willingly pushing the Deep State China bad narrative representing the conservative side of the Deep State coin…as opposed to the liberal side of the same coin, Russia bad.
    Heads they win…tails you lose.

  52. Marckus says:

    I dont pay any heed to members of the tribe and their pronouncements. I am not interested in anything a back door boy has to vomit up. He has nothing to say that would interest me.

    Nevertheless, here is the author, who should know better, fawning and gushing over this wretched pervert. Surely if kneeling, grovelling and subservience is an enjoyable habit, the author can find someone higher up the food chain to slobber over.

  53. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    The God of Christianity who behooved you “to be fruitful and multiply” is not the problem. It’s the selfish men and women such as yourself that have embraced technology ( the Pill, abortion ) in order to sustain a childish, carefree hedonistic lifestyle. Like Narcissus- you’d rather spend your life admiring your reflection in the mirror while “pumping iron.”
    Now that the chickens have come home to roost and white births plummet, a more sanguine people ( Mexicans, Muslims) have been imported to do the tedious work of forming families, reproducing and paying taxes.

    You reap what you sow: You are biological dead- end.

    • Replies: @Shamil
    , @Stan d Mute
    , @Alden
  54. Marckus says:
    @Smith

    Into every life comes unhappiness. Into every life comes a bit of sleaze.

    Unz holds the Grifter up as a gob of slimy scum for all to see. That way when Andy “writes” we can regard his boot licking propaganda with knowing eyes.

  55. John Hagan says: • Website

    I am continually amazed that Americans miss the obvious. The answer to bigotry is satire of that bigotry. From Shakespeare onwards satire was the weapon that most angered and frightened the bigots. Two examples I will post here …

  56. Realist says:
    @Joel Ryan

    “He might be a homosexual Jew” is one of the stupidest opening sentences I’ve ever seen. The religious BS in the fourth paragraph further adds to the perception that this writer needs remedial help.

    Yes, it was a gratuitous, irrelevant comment. It shows Anglin’s hatred of both Jews and homosexuals…which has no relevance to the subject.

  57. BuelahMan says:

    He might be a homosexual Jew

    Exactly what I was thinking about Anglin.

    • LOL: Trinity
  58. John Hagan says: • Website

    I am continually amazed that Americans miss the obvious. The answer to bigotry is satire of that same bigotry. From Shakespeare onwards satire was the weapon that most angered and frightened the bigots. George Carlin and today Jimmy Dore were and are satirists. Two strong and extreme examples I will post here which have passed the censors on twitter an youtube as well as many other sensitive social media operations and their aim is to destroy the mainstream media’s reporting. That US audiences are so superficial and educationally unsophisciated is exactly why such dumbells on CNN and elsewhere have an audience …

    and

  59. @Smith

    Is that you, Striker? LMAO

    • Replies: @Smith
  60. @Joel Ryan

    I knew I would not be disappointed that someone would breed “triggered” and immediately perform their little holier than thou bit.

    I don’t disagree that the crudeness with which Anglin went about was not necessary and it really does take a certain personality type that is archetypal of the author’s cohort, and always sabotages their own points; however, he’s also not wrong to point out that even if Greenwald is making good points well and more effectively than Anglin, homosexuality is still a detrimental characteristic to humanity, no different than Judaism and it’s awful beliefs are. Ironically about your also archetypal perfection of Godwin’s Law, is that the very reason that both gays and Jews were punished “for no reason whatsoever” is precisely the kinds of abuses and degeneracy pushed by those very exact same groups.

    You reference that persecution, but I even suspect that Glenn Greenwald is probably smart enough to know that what he is doing by blatantly calling out these abuses and perversions will have one or both of the following impacts. 1) it will either save both gays and Jews from a “persecution for no reason whatsoever” by preventing people becoming so totally fed up and end up saying “fu*k it!”, precisely for the very same reasons they happened last time. And/or 2), he is or has been told to try to put the throttle on the very thing that is deliberate and intentional subversion and perversion and destruction of all Europeans in line with Jewish prophecy, because it has just gone too far and its way too obvious and it may lead to #1 rather than actually destroying Edom and the Amalek (it all European people and all countries Europeans created) as Jewish books and rabbis say it’s prophecy and therefore dictated.

  61. In order to view this article I had to adjust my monitor’s resolution upward to 2560×1440 to accommodate Anglin’s ego.

    • Agree: Sollipsist
  62. Emslander says:
    @Joel Ryan

    It’s the perfect opening to this article about the generation that has become a perpetual junior high school sentimentality party. It says, “Hey, this shit from the NYT is too much for any thinking human being, even a guy who fits into two of the categories that ought to be slavishly following the daily rule changes on Big Brother’s video feed.”

    What Anglin is good at is putting up front what remains in the back of your mind when reading commentary, because you’ve been conditioned by soccer coaches, kindergarten teachers, third grade fat girls and the New York Times never to express or even think about. Anglin always says just what needs to be said, if the attempt is being undertaken to report on the dominant Weltanschauung.

    • Replies: @cronkitsche
  63. @Dumbo

    Greenwald lives in Brazil with his lover.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  64. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    It appears Anglin has been fatally infected with the lethal mind virus of Christianity.

    Christianity is the greatest force for genius the world has known. It embraces the doctrine of natural law found in the Hebrew Bible. It cherishes a legacy of Christ which is human rights. Human rights allow the full expression of human creativity and endeavor. Yet this freedom is balanced with reverence for divine order and responsibility to Him, I AM.

    God is the author of love and brilliance in man. Michelangelo knew this in his Sistine Chapel. Rublev showed this in his Trinity icon. All good, truth, dignity, and honor flow from God. Glory to His Name forever!

    • Agree: Emslander, gsjackson
  65. @jsinton

    Is not homosexuality one of the gravest sins? One that “cries out to Heaven for justice?”

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  66. Hillaire says:
    @Joel Ryan

    points to be made …

    1: greenwald is a homo jew.

    2:’joel’ may be a homo jew (doesn’t like the christian references).

    3: could be be brian stelter tone policing.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  67. “Whatever his motivations, he is doing God’s work. That is the lesson we learn: that everyone ultimately reports to God, and if God wants to use a homosexual Jew to do his work, God will use a homosexual Jew to do his work.”

    Of course, if there is no God then the whole idea is null and void… a homosexual Jew is no different from other Jews when it comes to money … they all worship Mammon.

  68. @Shamil

    “I am an American Muslim who left the US and relocated to a Muslim country 2 years ago because my daughter’s(1st grade) school in Bay Area California thought it was a good idea to have a transgender activist visit children that young and introduce them to non binary genders.”

    You did the right thing… America wasn’t discovered and built into a powerhouse by the White Christian Europeans for the benefit of Muslims.

    • Replies: @Shamil
  69. While what Greenwald says is truthful, I find it hilarious that he doesn’t look at his own tribe’s contribution to today’s media manipulation. None of this is new. It’s been going on since the small hats started to infiltrate American media and academia in the 1920s. The damage they have done has been incalculable. Today it is just a question of scale, given the technological advances.

    Kudos to Anglin for his fine article.

  70. I read the greewald screed, read the AA piece.

    hardly noticed the fag jew parts, but the commenters here were fixated on it. hardly a mention of the destruction going on at the hands of fags jews and women around the world..the commenters working here have a ways to go in understanding the destruction and ways of the world. mammon worshipping doesn’t win.
    edomites don’t win
    homos don’t win.

    Thanks RU
    Thanks AA

  71. @Joel Ryan

    Disagree.

    Andrew Anglin is a performance artist.

    Yes, (like many such theatrical types), he probably isn’t sure what is his persona and what is him; but he is funny.

    There’s an intellectual humility to his humour. By laughing at himself and others, he is conceding that his ideas may be wrong; which is true of everyone; and therefore he is clearly distinct from the psychopathic monomaniacal Jew haters who often comment here.

    Beware of those who cannot laugh at themselves for they cannot see how they could possibly be wrong, and therefore will be able to do every wrong completely blindly. No one is protected by their sense of humanity as they don’t even see themselves human.

    Also, let him who is without sin cast the first stone. And therefore let us all not cast stones (except to arrest others when they are mid-stone throwing!)

    Cheers Andrew. Life is life and these progressives are death. I’d much rather have a drink with you.

  72. @noname27

    Yes.

    Andrew Anglin is a stalking horse for the intelligence agencies, who for some odd reason think that white nationalists are a real threat that needs to be infiltrated and controlled.

    Andrew Anglin is not to be taken seriously.

    The Daily Stormer, even when it was not yet banned, was so filled to the brim with trolls, bots, and sock puppets that it was difficult to find a real human being on there. That place had more rats than The Departed, with Anglin playing some sort of hybrid Sullivan/Costello role.

    I would certainly advise against getting involved with Anglin. It won’t lead to anything good.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    , @noname27
  73. Shamil says:
    @Levtraro

    You don’t want Muslims in the West. That’s fine.
    Listen, I think it’s fair for the natives of a country to choose who to let and don’t let in their countries. But with one condition: the host country did not have a hand in destroying the country from where the refugees are coming. I am from Afghanistan so I don’t need reminding you the role the US played in a) arming drug lords who destroyed it, b) invaded it based on lies. Even if it was the government that did that, the average people also have a responsibility towards the action of their governments.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  74. Rich says:
    @Shamil

    You’re lucky that there is a place where you, as a Muslim, can go and not be constantly assaulted with degeneracy. Christians have nowhere. Portugal, Spain, Italy, Ireland, they were all once serious Catholic countries that have recently swallowed Satan’s poison. Now Poland, the country that saved the Christian West, is under assault from all sides. The world is heading for dark times, we’ll be going to Mass in the Catacombs again, soon.

    • Replies: @Shamil
  75. Shamil says:
    @Stonehands

    Good point. The people who will survive the coming cataclysms are the ones who love life. What better way to love life then to bring kids and build healthy families. White folks are losers in this department. I have a white friend who is in his 30s and single, he lost his job due to Covid. He could not afford housing in San Francisco and asked his parents if he could stay with them till he found a job. His parents refused to host him. Their convenience was more important than the poor guy’s situation. He ended up in a shelter. you will never hear of a Muslim going without shelter. Friends, family, local community, they all will come to each other’s help. White folks whine a lot about Jews, but conveniently forget how weak and untenable their own communal networking is.

    • Thanks: TTSSYF
  76. Shamil says:
    @Temporary Insanity

    Discovered? What are you smoking? more like invaded and pillaged from the Native Americans, through treachery and brutality. You built nothing worth keeping. And it is now being brutally pillaged by the Judaics through treachery. You reap what you sow.

  77. Well it’s a good article but I kinda think Glenn is not exercising his right to chose not to be gay the same way I am choosing not to exercise my right not to be attracted to girls. It’s either there or it ain’t. Judaism invented this morbid obsession about homosexuality because the tribal imperative was to reproduce quickly, to make more warriors to battle other superstitious barbarian tribes for grazing rights in the desert. Plus, even if YHWH cursed you with a girl child, she could always be sold for hard cash in the slave market if times got tough. Charming folks, one and all.

    Advanced cultures, Greeks and Romans, had no word for homosexual as it did not occur to them that there was anything unusual about the fact that some people fell in love with members of their own gender. When the Christians continued this bizarre Jewish horror of gays, Romans thought it hilarious that their pitiful god evidenced such a strange fixation about what people did with their private parts.

    • Replies: @MGB
    , @Crawfurdmuir
    , @Dumbo
  78. Emslander says:
    @Shamil

    Shamil, you are correct.

    I do wonder which Muslim country you now live in, because the practices vary pretty significantly between them.

    • Replies: @Shamil
  79. @Joel Ryan

    It is sad that you are so witless that you cannot see that the purpose of the first ten words or so was specifically to attract the attention of the hall monitors. That it made me smile was, I am sure, secondary.

    • Thanks: gsjackson
    • Replies: @Joel Ryan
  80. moi says:
    @Icy Blast

    For me, Wolf Blitzer comes to mind. Both he and Stelter are shills for Israel.

    • Replies: @Mustapha Mond
  81. @Hammer

    Yeah. It makes you wonder. Maybe they are just millennials. Public schooling destroyed their brains.

  82. MGB says:

    Frankly, I couldn’t give a dried fig about Greenforest’s personal life, but professionally he is not to be trusted. Even if his article is spot on, which it is, any semi-literate, objective observer of the press would have already reached this conclusion by the beginning of the anti-Trump hysteria. His association with ‘the intercept’, its screwing of sources, and his screeching response to any criticism of the financialization and selective disclosure of Snowden materials sums it up.

    • Replies: @MGB
  83. FoSquare says:
    @geokat62

    I prefer the double X. It’s as if you got kicked in the nuts twice.

    • LOL: geokat62
  84. WJ says:
    @Shamil

    The Siberian immigrants you call Native Americans, had no written language, had no technology, no method of counting. They didn’t have the horse and wouldn’t have them until the Spaniards brought them back to the continent. They slaughtered the continent’s megafauna over the 1000 years of their initial occupation . I don’t get to see a sabre tooth tiger, a giant ground sloth or a wooly mammoth due their 1000 year long bbq. White Europeans didn’t first discover NA but they made it great. More than can be said for for any Muslim occupation anywhere on the globe. You made the right choice to move. Good luck.

    • Agree: TTSSYF
    • Replies: @Shamil
    , @Mefobills
  85. MGB says:
    @Observator

    That seems about right. Strange that ancient civilizations would have a more developed sense of privacy than we do. That, in my opinion, is at the root of the current fixation on ‘identities’, good and bad. Just another tool for obliterating any private space, and a way to vacuum up information. And I don’t think it is so much of a process of homogenization, turning everyone into mongrels like the racialists believe, it’s to prevent any standard belief system from forming at all. Right now ‘woke’ is the secret decoder ring for a new, select sect, even allowing some of the poors to get into the act. ‘Woke’ will be dispensed with in a few years for some novel ideology, dreamt up by Kurzweil or Thiel or some other tech psychopath, when being human is the sin in the face of the singularity.

  86. @Levtraro

    Orwell was a snitch for the UK gov’t, giving names of suspected wrong-thinkers along with their possibly embarrasing habits or tendencies to an agent of a semi-secret UK office dealing with disinformation and propaganda

    Sources, please. Or retract.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Levtraro
  87. Mike Tre says:
    @Hammer

    The very first comment is by someone with 3 comments in their history, and the other 2 are from June of 2020. So I’d say a sockpuppet.

  88. Shamil says:
    @Emslander

    I am from Afghanistan originally. Came to the US in 1999 as an asylum seeker with my parents. I live between Jordan and Pakistan. The latter mostly.

    • Replies: @Emslander
    , @BlackFlag
  89. @Leander Starr

    You’re not supposed to eat endangered multihued tropical rainforest frogs you dummy. Now go put some Gorilla Glue on your head.

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @durd
    , @Achmed E. Newman
  90. @cranc

    The day that Glenn Greenwald writes an extensive book detailing the role of highly organised, highly funded Jewish power groups buying up, blackmailing, spying on, censoring, or otherwise subverting the political culture of the United States for their own tribal interests, that is the day I will take him seriously as ‘an adversary of the establishment

    Bravo. Greenwald is no angel – and has never had anything whatever to say about those who, to quote Mel Gibson, (((are responsible for all the problems on earth))).

  91. geokat62 says:

  92. Shamil says:
    @Rich

    You are right. Not too many places comes to mind to live as an upright Christian I guess. I should say as a European Christian. There still are countries in Africa that have not sold themselves to the devil yet. But even I wouldn’t contemplate living in Africa.

  93. Emslander says:
    @Shamil

    So, even a fairly unrestricted Muslim country allows children to grow up normally. That’s encouraging. My children didn’t attend public school here in US. There were problems anyway.

  94. Che Guava says:
    @Jiminy

    Big bones? Just a poor excuse from grossly obese women.

    • Replies: @Polistra
  95. Shamil says:
    @WJ

    “They slaughtered the continent’s megafauna over the 1000 years of their initial occupation”.

    Its open to debates whether technology is a good thing in the long scheme of things. But you can not possibly argue that the Native Americans were bad for the environment over the Europeans. The latter has single handedly disturbed the balance of the ecosystem more than any other race or group of people in history.

    • Disagree: TTSSYF
  96. @Intelligent Dasein

    intelligence agencies, who for some odd reason think that white nationalists are a real threat that needs to be infiltrated and controlled

    No, the “intelligence agencies” do not think any such thing.

    (((Those who control and direct the intelligence agencies from above))) think that.

    • Replies: @Not Only Wrathful
  97. Lyrac says: • Website

    Bravo, Mr. Anglin. That was such a great point, that these people are destroyers of creativity.

    Also want to share with you a great quote re shame: “Shame is a mental attitude without which man would not be under the degree of pressure which is needed for the production of truth.” (Rosestock-Huessy)

    The lies emitted from the mouths of Demonrats and DC bureaucrats is astonishing. I suppose liars never really achieve adulthood.

    We have a reckoning in this country with truth. A meeting, a confrontation: and if we fail to be present, it really will be the end.

  98. Mike Tre says:
    @Jimmy le Blanc

    And that’s not a coincidence.

  99. saggy says:

    If you look out at the media landscape, there is virtually no one willing to tell the truth, and Glenn always does.

    If only. Greenwald is controlled opposition and will never tell the truth about the holohoax,i.e. that it did not happen, the starting point of understanding post WW II history.

  100. nsa says:
    @Levtraro

    Three well known snitches: Orwell, Ron Reagan, Tim Leary. Orwell (real name Eric Blair) fought with the anarchists in the Spanish Civil War, and never forgot his communist allies turning on and hunting down anarchists. He had a long memory and later settle scores with the communists. Ron Reagan as president of the Screen Actors Guild had a direct line to Hoover at the FBI, ratting out lefty actors including his friends. Tim Leary ratted out those who sprang him from jail in order to return to the US. As to the “especially at old age” comment, Orwell had no old age. He died of TB at age 49.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  101. Che Guava says:
    @Dave Bowman

    Sorry, I can’t supply sauces, but have read the same ones. Blair/Orwell’s diaries and collected writings give much evidence for Levtrano’s claim. Other sources are post-humous. They do, or did, exist.

    This is not to detract from his many great works.

    … but then, Homage to Catalonia, when Blair was still a Trotskyite, pales against For Whom the Bell Tolls.

  102. FoSquare says:
    @Schuetze

    If Greenwald really wants to prove that he is a brave hero to the goy and defender of free speech then lets see him write articles telling the truth about the holocaust…

    Agree! He could start with 9/11.

  103. Jiminy says:

    I find it’s strange how with all of the dramatic news reports ranging from societal destroying viruses, blm riots, to terrorists plots, the end result seems to be a ploy to keep the great unwashed controlled, in a constant state of anxiety. The public feels that they have to go to sleep at night with one eye open and always on edge. It’s like a crime, to be able to relax and smell the roses.
    Seemingly more and more people are at each other’s throats. And yet the western world has never really had it so good, especially since at least the middle of last century. I find that it becomes more noticeable the less news you watch. When you finally turn on the squawk-box it hits you like a sledgehammer-so much negativity. I know that I can handle it, but there are a lot of people who seem to take it all to heart. Often you can see it on their faces or hear it in their voices. It’s clearly a well thought out diversion that appears to have no end.

  104. @Jimmy le Blanc

    To the people of The Book, the Jews, Christians and Muslims, homosexuality is an abomination deserving of capital punishment ever since the time of Leviticus. I don’t know what happened to these people today.

  105. At the deepest level, no one can speak for another persons thoughts, motivations or actions. Trump could be a bad guy, a really bad guy. Or, he might have had the country’s best interests at heart, as he had always claimed in the past, Who knows? One thing is clear however, about his four year term as president, to wit, he revealed the absolute extent of D.C.’s criminal political culture, the big institutions, including the Congress, Senate and the so called Fourth Estate, the establishment news media. Watching the ‘show trials” the last couple of weeks, only made me marvel all the more at how real and true the corruption is. The guilty, trying to pass judgement on one who is obviously less guilty than they are.. Trump was acquitted by the cooler and less hypocritical heads among his peers.

    • Agree: davidgmillsatty
  106. @Hammer

    more likely anglin himself is a cointelpro asset, ye bleached-white shitstain

  107. First of all, to Mr. Anglin, I’d never read your writing before, but I love your style, Sir! I’d tried to get on your site right about the time your being hounded by the speech police. (Actually, I think that was the impetus for my searching for your writing.) Yes, there were plenty of supposedly free-speech-supporting pundits with their excuse “oh, Mr. Anglin is just too much, but don’t get me wrong, I support free speech”. Well, you know it, “first they came for …” and all that.

    The Peak Stupidity blog noted that the specific subset of behavior used to struggle against, if I may, those who don’t even use a disparaging unWoke term, but just mention the word, is very much like a certain Monty Python skit. It used to be the case that American understood that it was comedy, not to be taken seriously as it is now. Using the McNeil episode as one of many examples, Peak Stupidity posted “Cancelling the Cancellers”, with the Monty Python movie scene in question.

    Mr. Greenwald indeed notes this point, the difference between use of a disparaging term as opposed to mention of it (thanks, commenter MBlanc46). However, as much as I respect Mr. Greenwald, I still see him wimping out. Everyone wants to point out that he still is against “hate” or something. The virtual signaling is almost universal:

    To declare any discussion of that term off-limits — as Lorenz tried to do — is deeply anti-intellectual. To pretend that there is no difference in the use of that term by the Redditors and its discussion in Clubhouse on the one hand, and its malicious deployment as an insult to the cognitively disabled on the other, is dishonest in the extreme.

    I guess I’ll have to virtue signal too, but I can honestly say that I’d feel terrible for accidentally using the term “retard” in front of the parents of a, well, lets just say retarded child. (Yes, I use the old term. I still say Peking, Burma, and occasionally Ceylon too – Sue me. I own nothing!) However, I use the term “retard” disparagingly whenever the hell I want to on my own site.

    Yes, there is a difference, Mr. Greenwald, but if Mr. Andersen had said the word “retards” and said it disparagingly too, that’s still no damn business of this fat broad who calls herself a journalist!

  108. @Joel Ryan

    Doug Anglin has at least three things that Joel Ryan lacks: (1) a respect for what freedom of speech entails; (2) a sense of humor; (3) intelligence. But thanks, Joel, for helping to make Anglin’s point that at present we are infested with dangerous losers like you, a combination of uber-sensitive snowflake and viciously efficient gauleiter.

  109. Yes they are evil, but what is even more evil is the idea that they matter. The population does what it is told. That someone is forced to grovel because he might have said something “hurtful” reveals that the whole population is a bowl of chicken soup. What if he said “Of course it was hurtful. It was meant to be.” Populations that are tuned into reports of and ready to be outraged by the news that someone said something “hurtful” are simply slaves ready for the whip. Greenwald did not slay a dragon, he stepped on an ant. That this is big news is a bad sign.

  110. I didn’t want to make that last comment too long, so I am pasting this clip in as my attempt to show the proper use of the word “retarded”. One can’t go wrong by relying on the expertise of the Scranton, Penn, branch office manager of Dunder Mifflin Paper, Michael Scott. He explains in 11 seconds. Pay attention “journalists”:

  111. @lloyd

    The language of the new censorship has a certain prissiness and lack of objectivity about it that recalls Women’s Commons room. That is the one aspect of it that even Andrew seems to avoid.

    If one regularly checks out the Daily Stormer, one quickly learns that Mr. Anglin expends plenty of his apt and amusing vitriol on today’s females.

  112. I keep getting “checking your browser before accessing” when trying to get on this website. It doesn’t go away on duck but it goes away after 5 seconds, on, of course, Google, so that a red flag gets flagged, I guess. Anybody else have this problem? Think it’s the opening salvos in a cancellation?

  113. @Rahan

    Please consider using the “Insert MORE Tag” button.

  114. R2b says:
    @Joel Ryan

    What an ureadable article.
    What does it even say.
    Please explain.
    Instead comments is about men penetrating men.
    The gay Rockefeller right?
    Or?

  115. Kouroi says:

    So what is new under the Sun I ask?

    Since the beginning of the domestication of humans and even before, in the hominid groups, a small group with the alpha male has strived to control the rest. When at the beginning was the fist and the bite, with intelligence and speech, more subtle means of control have been devised. And ultimately, the group, even in more or less egalitarian settings, like the village, has used shame to control those perceived as not “normies”.

    There were of course a lot of people eagerly and shamelessly engaged as “mercenaries” in this activity of “control”. Power is in itself a thing to behold…

    And one mean of control is to first not allow the other to have a voice.

    For instance, the fabled “The Economist”, many years ago has cancelled the comments section on its online site because 95% of the comments/commentators were disagreeing with the paper’s position.

    This is the world we live in and this is who we are as a species, and if we really do not want that the future to be a boot on our faces we need to continue speaking up, fighting, with courage and honesty. That will shine through and most of the population (which sits on the sideline and watches, because it is never fun to stick your neck out) will see it and might even make their opinion known.

  116. Here is the key sentence by Glenn Greenwald

    tech monopolies, which never wanted the responsibility to censor

    His piece is an attempt to exculpate the tech monopolies, while heaping the guilt on the hacks, not even on the media lords. It is fun to beat the hacks; but they are nothing without their lords’ backing or orders; and their lords are not much next to Big Tech, whom Glenn finds innocent. Sorry, but in my view this item is as misleading as practically everything written by Greenwald.

  117. GeeBee says:
    @Rahan

    ‘Mr ‘Wang Lin’ – very good! I found your long comment to be full of sound insight and perspicacity. I especially liked your concept of ‘A & B’ regarding constraints, filter, fascism etc. I should like to develop your theme, and possibly refine it also.

    First, when you state that: ‘In a sense WWI was the culmination of the dismantling of the old “king-and-aristocracy” based world order. This was followed by a period in which “all sane people” promoted democracy based on transparency of institutions, rotation of elites through fair elections, freedom of speech, all that jazz.’ you are right, but I feel it should be born in mind that the gestation of today’s dystopian nightmare began long before 1914. ‘The Grand Rebellion’ in England truly saw the framework (and many of the details) put in place. The murder of Charles I was not merely outrageous (every bit as much as the Bolsheviks’ killing of the Tsar and his family almost 270 years later) but saw the last defender of the excellent paternalism embodied under Traditionalism dealt a mortal blow.

    The ensuing decades, and in course of time centuries, saw the ambitions of the burgeoning merchant class come to full fruition. Whereas the king and aristocracy up until The Grand Rebellion (which is to say up until the 1640s) cared for the masses, and exercised their responsibilities that were ineluctably bound up with privilege in this regard, the new merchant class felt no such ties to what had been, until they set out on the path of self-enrichment, no more than their own peer group, whom they came largely to despise.

    Once their triumph was complete, however, this vulgar cohort of upstarts made sure that ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’ were universally perceived as being diametrically opposite to their true nature. For the reality of these perennial twin cries of the callous despot and the scheming agent of rapine is that ‘the people’ are put under a far heavier yoke than that which they are meekly persuaded was hitherto so burdensome.

    As for the agency that facilitated this deception, we need look no further than Protestant Christian axiology, and especially that foul manifestation of it we know as Puritanism. Indeed, the close connection which the commercial element in England bore to Puritanism cannot be over stressed. Neither can the hold which Puritanism began to take of the Parliamentary party in the struggle with the King in 1628. Indeed, as Anthony Ludovici noted, “The triumph of Parliament did not mean the triumph of the liberties of the people. It meant the triumph of a new morality, a new outlook on life, and a new understanding of what life was worth. It meant the triumph of the morality of unrestricted competition, of uncontrolled and unguided trade, and of a policy of neglect in regard to all things that really mattered.”

    Indeed, Rogers tells us, in his The industrial and commercial history of England (1892) that “the war between King and Parliament is the beginning of the modern system of finance.”

    But it was more than that. As Ludovici added: “The success of Puritanism meant the triumph of the new commercial morality, which held good among moneyed men; capitalists had established their right to secure a return for their money, and there was no authority to insist upon any correlative duty, when they organised industrial undertakings and obtained a control of the means of production. This was what the Grand Rebellion achieved, and this, in the main, was the sole object of the Grand Rebellion.”

    And as for England in the seventeenth-century, so the entire Western world today.

    • Thanks: MrVoid, Rahan
    • Replies: @Kouroi
    , @Rocha
  118. Sbin says:

    Glenn Greenwald is good.
    But Covid nonsense and Trump would be president if author wasn’t disappeared?
    Think the gentleman does protest to much.

  119. @Emslander

    Mr. Unz could have selected a more temperate author’s summary and praise of Greenwald’s condemnation of corporate-backed investigative censors. But in publishing Anglin’s blunt, vulgar piece, the editor can trespass every boundary and bruise every group’s sensibility. He succeeds in rejecting all censorious restrictions: Christians’, Jews’, Liberals’, anti-Jews’, Conservatives’, Sexual Extremists’, Libertines’, Traditionalists’, and Muslims’. (To those who object to Anglin’s opening statement, I point out that Mr. Greenwald is not simply a privately homoerotic man; he is “married” to a man and they “have” two children. His Jewishness seems to be entirely ethnic, with no allegiance at all to the Jewish religion.) Between Mr. Anglin’s activism and that of the lawyer-journalist he praises, there’s enough inclusiveness and exclusiveness to outrage everybody.

  120. Kudos to Ron Unz for publishing Anglin. If this doesn’t make their heads explode, nothing will..

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
  121. Wally says:
    @Joel Ryan

    said:
    ” Maybe there’s some satiric commentary there regarding Nazis killing both Jews and gays. ”

    Except Germans did neither and there is no proof they did.

    It’s really amazing how easy it is to expose liars, just call them out and ask for proof of their lies.

  122. @Icy Blast

    Did Beria also have a head that looked like a glans penis with facial features drawn on it ?

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  123. @Dumbo

    It’s all genetic. Murder is a genetic urge. That’s why it’s an acceptable form of existence to exercise your genetic rights! Don’t tinker with groovy Mother Nature! Science is real !

    I don’t think Greenwald does much with his johnson. .

    . . does Wikipedia provide definitions for “much” ? Their editors are soo helpful.

  124. @israel shamir

    It’s a classic exercise in diversion, reifying one section of the whole complex as the root of the problem – reminiscent of Mencius Moldbug’s “Cathedral”. Another almost-there Jew eager to assign blame extra carefully to avoid the old cognitive dissonance.

    Can’t pat these guys on the back for sort of siding against the complex. They didn’t when Daily Stormer was purged, they still don’t, so whatever.

    Exculpating Big Tech is just retarded.

  125. @obwandiyag

    The explanation goes something like this:

    -On some occasions, Cloudflare is checking your browser on behalf of other
    organizations.
    -By checking your browser before accessing their website, companies ensure your device won’t push
    harmful elements.
    -So what does checking my browser mean? you might say.
    -It means that on the other side they want to prevent DDoS attacks and make sure your PC is real.

    https://windowsreport.com/cloudflare-checking-browser/

    Or in other words Cloudfare is spying on you!

    And what does the “make sure your PC is real” even mean? What can a non-real PC do? Can a non-PC access the Internet, or even exist as an “unreal PC”?

    And why does the duration of this check vary from very quick to very long? Perhaps more thorough “checking”, “vetting”, i.e. spying.

  126. @obwandiyag

    I thought that message was somehow related to Unz’ own defenses against a potential denial-of-service attack from its enemies

  127. @Dave Bowman

    What reason do they have for thinking such groups are a genuine threat?

  128. @israel shamir

    That was a howler — much as I enjoyed Greenwald’s overall critique, as an editor I’d have to ask where he was getting that idea from

  129. lloyd says: • Website
    @lloyd

    I had wondered if someone might point out that the Cultural revolution in China was led by men. Then I remembered Madam Chiang, Mao’s wife, brought it to its worst most hysterical excesses. The mainland Chinese blame her entirely and from my experience completely exonerate Mao. The most fanatical supporters of Charlie Manson were his girls. Of course those who carry out most of the physical dirty work of revolutions are men.

    • Replies: @The Soft Parade
  130. Kouroi says:
    @GeeBee

    Excellent comment good sir! Tip of the hat to you.

  131. @noname27

    When you saw a thief, you consented with him, And have been a partaker with adulterers.
    Psalm 50:18

    • Replies: @noname27
  132. @Cauchemar du Singe

    Do you mean that Beria had a cathead dick for a face?

  133. Borger says:

    Taylor Lorenz also quickly deleted tweets that were sympathetic to James fields on that fateful say. She waS a witness to the event and concealed this.

  134. @Schuetze

    The Daily Stormer’s comment section, including memetic Monday, is now here:

    https://gameruprising.to/index.php

    Seems like it might be under DOS attack now, but it’s usually reliable. Bookmark it!

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  135. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    It appears Anglin has been fatally infected with the lethal mind virus of Christianity.

    It’s especially hilarious that a guy who’s supposed to be insightful and funny fails to recognize the truth that he is a Jew worshipper while criticizing Jews. I can only wonder if the same dynamic underlies his criticism of the shirt lifters.

    Tell the truth Anglin! You are a power bottom like Greenwald aren’t you?

  136. @obwandiyag

    When this process appears upon approaching site I simply remove all presence of my shape, shadow, size, shine or sillouette until it’s gone. [click] Maybe it is Ron Unz.

    Please let’s not get started on how or why Ron Unz to date has avoided the inevitable.

  137. Skeptikal says:
    @Joel Ryan

    That opener and the subsequent obsessive off-the-wall “identity” comments really turned me off.
    Does this guy have an ounce of judgment?

    Glenn Greenwald’s being a homosexual is irrelevant to anything unless he chooses to write about that subject.
    His being Jewish is only a tiny iota less irrelevant.

    There is no need to let this guy speak for Greenwald. I wish Ron Unz had arranged for Greenwald’s piece to be published directly at UR. Makes me question also Unz’s judgment.

    It certainly creates a no-win for GG where a supposed fan frames him in an insulting, patronizing fashion.

    AA, why don’t you go and jerk off in front of your wife instead of here at UR.

  138. @lloyd

    Little running dog barketh aspersions at our Madam “WinnieMandela” Chiang….?
    YOU GO NOW

  139. @animalogic

    It’s an oblique reference to the current German Leftist Gubbamint prosecuting a 100 year old former camp guard…and another aged office secretary at another DERENTION/LABOR camp.

    btw, if The Third Reich was going to kill millions of Noses as soon as they got to the camps, why bother with the ID tattoos, and roofs under which to sleep.
    They cpould have left them out in cold wet weather with NOTHING, like Eisenhower did to thousands of surrendered Wehrmacht soldiers…that died from that treatment.

    • Replies: @dimples
    , @animalogic
  140. he can only say those things BECAUSE he’s a jewish homo, not despite being one. and it’s not clear how much longer he’ll be allowed to talk about this stuff anyway.

    • Agree: Crescent Moon
  141. 15 yrs ago a guy from Iran that I knew said “Social media, the Jews want to know if we are talking about them.”
    And he was exactly right because of what they have done to Western Civilization they are paranoid.
    Rightfully so…

    • Agree: FLgeezer, Trinity
  142. Schuetze says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    I went to gameruprising, I had been there a few months ago. A couple of comments:
    – I cannot easily determine how to register to comment…. at Unz it is far more simple
    – The memes are not full sized and I cannot make them full sized without having a registered user
    – There is no clear link between the comments on gameruprising and the dailystormer article
    – The number of comments for this article there is now 27
    For this reason it would be good if UR still put a dailystormer blog roll on the right ala Sailer and Kersey.

  143. saggy says:

    By the way, what in hell happened to AA. He used to be one of my go-tos, when he recognized Trump for the shill and idiot that he is …. but at some point he made a 180 and is now a full on Trumpidiot, calling for a revolution in the streets to install Trump, etc. …. Weird …. AA has become an idiot, although he still produces some good stuff, like this article …

  144. Nazism suits these ‘liberals’ so very well. The progression from neo-capitalist oligarchy to fascism then destruction is pretty plain to see.

  145. @Carlton Meyer

    I’m very suspicious of his role in the disappearance of most of the Snowden revelations. Working with Omidyar gets the olfactory apparatus working furiously.

    • Agree: Schuetze
  146. @Skeptikal

    AADS (Andrew Anglin Derangement Syndrome) Victim No. _____
    who did depose and say:

    “…obsessive off-the-wall “identity” comments really turned me off . . .AA, why don’t you go and jerk off in front of your wife instead of here at UR.”

    brought to you by an AADS victim who visualizes his journalistic oppressor jerking off . . .

  147. @Czoykowski

    The Biggest Big Lie of all is ‘liberal democracy’.

  148. @Skeptikal

    If Greenwald’s homosexuality is irrelevant to his work, then why did he himself inform us of his persuasion? Same with his ethnic identity. All Anglin did was repeat what Greenwald had previously told us, yet you take offense why? Because you are a supremacist. You believe some people have privilege to say things that others don’t. Grow up!

    • Replies: @Joel Ryan
  149. Joel Ryan says:
    @Chris in Cackalacky

    Does it really appear that I want Anglin silenced? Thanks to freedom of speech, you’re welcome to assert this illogical leap, Anglin is welcome to say pretty much anything about gay Jews, and I’m able to to push back at both of you.

    Whether the “homosexual Jew” line was an edgy sendup, bigoted stereotype perpetuation, or questionable satiric attempt, using it in combination with muddled religious dogmas creates a certain kind of perception. Hence the suggestion that Mr. Anglin bolster his education in hopes of avoiding similar stupidities in the future. “Sending him back” was your choice of phrase — I’d rather see him move forward without the puerile comments on homosexuality, casual slurs, and religious psychobabble.

    • Agree: Skeptikal
    • Replies: @Chris in Cackalacky
  150. @Stonehands

    a more sanguine people ( Mexicans, Muslims) have been imported

    I see. So you believe yourself entitled to replace us if we don’t produce the number of sprogs that you demand?

    And here we were thinking that all the nifty technologies that we’ve created would reduce the number of sprogs necessary.

    • Replies: @Stonehands
  151. I would vote Greenwald for president. He has far more guts and integrity than Trump, Clinton and Obama combined!

    • LOL: Trinity
  152. Franz says:

    All I know of Glenn Greenwald is he spent years crafting interesting and often well-reasoned articles, slowly building his rep. Then the Cancel Club got his number.

    In a way, it’s the Greenwalds of the world who have the most to lose from all this. Go back a century or so when Ernest Hemingway was a young veteran learning his craft at newspapers and wire services and just trying to get by. A respected byline, a rep you could count on, was where you wanted to end up. Putting in the time, polishing the prose to make timely points simple and make sense of the day to day human zoo is what the game amounts to. If you win, you have a serious and loyal audience.

    What we see now is all that discipline and work can get flushed by one lazy twat with a grudge. The man should hit back, and hit back however he chooses. He chose the high road and tried to stay on it, but that ain’t possible in the lunatic environment the scumbags have been hired to create.

    And that last is key: This is happening because all the years of centralizing the media is over. The MSM is now a shark pool owned by a handful of billionaires with tons of money and not one iota of honor. The MSM is now weaponized and we’re the target.

    The only good thing here is Greenwald built enough of a following over the years to throw some punches back effectively. Here’s hoping he does. Hit hard, hit often.

    • Agree: niceland
  153. Rubicon says:

    WHY would any well educated individual spend even a millisecond on what we’ve learned about the US media in the year 2021???

    Secondly, why would Glenn Greenwald even bother acknowledging these fruit cakes?

    It boogles the mind. The Unz Review provides LOTS of insightful news/events from around the world.
    Time to get out of the mire to pursue knowledge & insight to ALL the events going on in The World.

    All of you can do better.

  154. Skeptikal says:
    @Hillaire

    “3: could be be brian stelter tone policing. ”

    I don’t know who Brian Stelter is, but I don’t see this as tone policing.
    My understanding of which is when a commenter polices what others say and especially how they say it, without participating in discussing the actual topic of the thread. Like a sancimonious referee.

    That doesn’t seem to be the case here. “Joel” called out AA for his opener and some agreed with him—that is, already had the same reaction to the opener. Like me, for one.

  155. FLgeezer says:
    @Schuetze

    Excellent summation Schuetze! Thank you,

  156. Abbybwood says:
    @SND

    Many years ago when I was a regular commenter at Crooksandliars (I think during the Obama/Hillary primaries?), I found some awesome anti-Hillary article at The Daily Stormer (a link I found from a link to another link).

    I didn’t know The Daily Stormer from World Wide Storms.

    Anyhow, I posted the DS link and was immediately banned by John Amato!

    Haven’t looked at their website for many years. Same with Commondreams. Same with Truthdig and HuffPo.

    Sad.

  157. @Shamil

    Discovered? What are you smoking? more like invaded and pillaged from the Native Americans, through treachery and brutality. You built nothing worth keeping. And it is now being brutally pillaged by the Judaics through treachery. You reap what you sow.

    LOL…Another nigger who hates ( in this case a SAND nigger ) who hates Western Civilization.

    Basically a Jew with a towel on his head instead of a kippa.

  158. Art says:

    Phony – phony – phony!

    All this over the word “retard”.

    Hmm — we had a much nicer and honest culture when we could call people “bitches and bastards.”

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
  159. durd says:
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Dude, do you know that you just called ‘her’ a frog? And also implied that Leander ate her? Don’t you know ‘her’ has always identified with the colors of the rainbow instead of the mundane colors one is born with, this is how ‘her’ chooses to express ‘her’ self in the truest sense.

    Those who put Gorilla Glue on their head usually identify as blonde afro when used with a little water.Is that what you are saying Leander is? A ‘her’ eating blonde afro thingy?

    Since this is your first offense that I am aware of, I will not post where you live, even though my fingers are aching to do so. In the future could you refrain from your divisive coloring of others as it threatens our democracy. Thank you.

    • LOL: Jim Bob Lassiter
  160. @Rahan

    Hell of a comment, Rahan, and though I understand Jus’ Sayin’ reply, I am kind of glad you didn’t use the [More] tag on this one.

    My only one very small beef is that I think censorship now is MUCH WORSE than in 19th century anywhere-I-can-thing-of. I’d say it’s damn close to USSR and Red China Communism at this point. We don’t have to let it keep going though, unlike those who let themselves get disarmed. It’s unfortunate, but the way it’s going, it will come to that.

    • Agree: Rahan
  161. @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Supposed to be an LOL, Mr. Lassiter. (One used to be able to change that right away.)

  162. dimples says:
    @Cauchemar du Singe

    “btw, if The Third Reich was going to kill millions of Noses as soon as they got to the camps, why bother with the ID tattoos, and roofs under which to sleep.”

    I believe it was the case that the ones to be gassed, mainly old persons and children, were separated out before the tattooing of those deemed to be fit for slave labor, at least at the Auschwitz camp. This is basic holocaust 101. But don’t quote me.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  163. Smith says:
    @Sam the Man

    Hai, I’m a recent converted of Richard Spencer-ism, Eric Striker-ism, Jimmy Dore-ism and general “wignat”-ism.

  164. Rocha says:
    @GeeBee

    Read the History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland by William Cobbett, a Protestant, to understand that the care of the poor ceased with the dissolution of the monasteries under Henry VIII. The new aristocracy that became wealthy on the spoils and attached to them were behind the removal of the rightful king James II to replace him by William of Orange who would not impede the establishment of a central bank and the legalization of usury.
    To compensate for the lack of provision for the poor which was the result of the Protestant Reformation and the teaching that good works were not necessary for salvation, Elizabeth I introduced the dreaded workhouse which continued in existence until 1960 when the last one closed.

    • Thanks: GeneralRipper
  165. @Stan d Mute

    Not my decision. That’s known as Manifest Destiny. Reap/Sow.

  166. Alden says:
    @Stonehands

    How many White children do you have?

    • Replies: @Stonehands
  167. Agent76 says:

    December 4, 2020 No Escape from Our Techno-Feudal World

    The political economy of the Digital Age remains virtually terra incognita. In Techno-Feudalism, published three months ago in France (no English translation yet), Cedric Durand, an economist at the Sorbonne, provides a crucial, global public service as he sifts through the new Matrix that controls all our lives.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/no-escape-techno-feudal-world/5731239

    SEPTEMBER 03, 2020 Press in His Pocket: Bill Gates Buys Media to Control the Messaging

    A Columbia Journalism Review expose reveals that, to control global journalism, Bill Gates has steered over \$250 million to the BBC, NPR, NBC, Al Jazeera, ProPublica, National Journal, The Guardian, the New York Times, Univision, Medium, the Financial Times, The Atlantic, the Texas Tribune, Gannett, Washington Monthly, Le Monde, Center for Investigative Reporting, Pulitzer Center, National Press Foundation, International Center for Journalists, and a host of other groups. To conceal his influence, Gates also funneled unknown sums via subgrants for contracts to other press outlets.

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/press-in-his-pocket-bill-gates-buys-media-to-control-the-messaging/

  168. Alden says:
    @obwandiyag

    It happens occasionally. Nothing new been happening for years.

  169. @Observator

    Advanced cultures, Greeks and Romans, had no word for homosexual…

    Neither did modern European languages until the late nineteenth century. My old copy of the Shorter OED gives a date for first use in English of 1897. It was at about this period that psychiatrists began to try to make a medical condition out of what had previously been regarded as a moral failing.

    …as it did not occur to them that there was anything unusual about the fact that some people fell in love with members of their own gender.

    Latin has a specific word for a male homosexual – cinædus – which is paralleled by and derived from the Greek word κίναιδος. There are many other Latin and Greek words denoting the same behavior in more specialized senses, e.g., catamitus (derived from the name Ganymede, in Greek mythology the cupbearer to Zeus), meaning a kept boy.

    The ancients were well acquainted with homosexuality, whatever they called it. See for example Plato’s Symposium, the Satiricon of Petronius, the second and ninth satires of Juvenal, some epigrams of Martial, and the entire twelfth volume of the Palatine Anthology, which is best characterised as a collection of dirty jokes about the subject. Classical civilisations did not consider the behavior a sin in the Jewish or Christian sense, but outside of certain very narrow contexts in which they approved of it, generally regarded it as a lapse of self-discipline. Social discredit was particularly attached to adult males that allowed themselves to be sodomized.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  170. One-off says:
    @Rahan

    First and perhaps only comment to this site:

    Amazing analysis and commentary.

    “Do you add or do you subtract?”

    You add much.

    As lamps go out all across this once-great nation I find more treasures such as this one in the oddest of places. Did they exist all along or has the widening shadow forced people (me) into narrower but still accessible fringes? No clue, but whether it is false hope or cause for hope, these finds are truly impressive.

    Thank you

    • Thanks: Rahan
  171. I can’t take Anglin too seriously ,he ran away from Charlottlesville. You’ll probably find him hiding in the library with Richard Spencer.

  172. Icy Blast says:
    @Joel Ryan

    What’s wrong with bigotry? You’re an insufferable, comically self-righteous bigot yourself!

    • Replies: @Biff
  173. Icy Blast says:
    @jsinton

    Do you think Dennis Praeger, or Ben Shapiro, or Charlie Kirk are going to offer you a job as a reward for your cringe-inducing, Neoconservative virtue-signalling? Don’t forget to renew your subscription to “National Review.”

  174. SeekerofthePresence: “Christianity is the greatest force for genius the world has known.”

    Genius? According to Christianity, there is no such thing.

    18Let no one deceive himself. If any of you thinks he is wise in this age, he should become a fool, so that he may become wise. 19For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God’s sight. As it is written: “He catches the wise in their craftiness.” 20And again, “The Lord knows that the thoughts of the wise are futile.”
    – 1 Corinthians 18-20

    SeekerofthePresence: “It embraces the doctrine of natural law found in the Hebrew Bible. It cherishes a legacy of Christ which is human rights.”

    Human rights? Jesus never heard of them. The Jesus of the Bible is okay with slavery, and his disciples think so little of human freedom they actually aspire to be his slaves. Also, anent the topic of this article, he says not a word about free speech. Free speech is something derived from white racial traditions, not Jewish scribblings.

    SeekerofthePresence: “Human rights allow the full expression of human creativity and endeavor. … All good, truth, dignity, and honor flow from God. ”

    Your God is a folie en masse, a collective hallucination. Good, truth, dignity, and honor preceded his invention and will exist long after he’s been forgotten.

  175. Biff says:
    @Icy Blast

    Other people’s “opinions” got you down?

    • Replies: @Icy Blast
  176. @Alden

    I have white children. And so do you; you are the exception not the rule.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  177. @Dumbo

    This is the current Andrew Anglin, now a veterano whose head is bloody but unbowed. I started reading his articles again about 3 months ago. He has indeed matured and writes a better brand of commentary these days. In earlier days, I’d read his stuff just for the hilarious insults he directed at those who richly deserved them, but I didn’t take his thinking seriously back then. Now I do.

  178. Glenn may be an unbelieving sodomite but he nails this particular issue quite well.

  179. @moi

    As I’m sure you are aware, Wolf Blitzer was formerly an editor working for AIPAC (https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/wolf-blitzer), as well as having a career that initially almost exclusively focused on jewish and Israeli issues.

    When it comes to Israel and jewish matters, it is more than apparent he is far from unbiased, to put it as mildly as possible.

    • Replies: @Art
  180. @israel shamir

    Hello Israel-

    Thanks for that. From the first time I started reading Greenwald’s stuff long ago, I felt he was a sugar-coated sayan, as his criticisms of Israel never went to core, critical issues that others tackled with courage and selflessness. He always mouthed the obvious, his criticisms were cotton puff balls when literary nuclear annihilation was called for. Another Unzer posted a while back that Greenwald admitted in a response to a comment on an article Glenn wrote years ago that in fact, he was a zionist. If so, that would be entirely consistent with what I have read of his work on that subject.

    Exculpating the ‘tech monopolies’ about censorship is ludicrous, but as those monopolies are almost exclusively controlled by people of Irish descent, it is to be expected from Mr Greenwald.

    Once again, it’s those darned Irish……. 😉

  181. What’s the other ingredient in a brandy Zadrozny? Slivovitz? Vermouth? Kvas?

  182. Art says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Free speech is something derived from white racial traditions

    Personal rights came about through Christian peoples intellectually agreeing to give each other the freedom of speech and assembly. Until that happened there was only vertical tribal hierarchical organization, based around biological prowess.

    p.s. Your anger and hate are showing. They diminish you.

  183. Art says:
    @Mustapha Mond

    As I’m sure you are aware, Wolf Blitzer was formerly an editor working for AIPAC (https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/wolf-blitzer), as well as having a career that initially almost exclusively focused on jewish and Israeli issues.

    Do any of those coercive Jew on CNN ever smile? They are sterile clones.

  184. “less advanced in mental, physical, or social development than is usual for one’s age.
    OFFENSIVE
    very foolish or stupid.”

    https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en/

    It seems a retarded practice to go about chasing down retarded speech. Especially when there is some speech that is retarded and dangerous, i.e.

    — false allegations of colluding with russians to undermine democracy with no evidence — that’s retarded.

    — given what we know of male female biology it’s beyond strange to make women compete against men — that just retarded.

    — importing people into the country illegally and giving them monies and benefits denied to the citizens that liver there — that’s retarded.

    — i don’t know, but bailing out those responsible for careless financial dealings sending millions homeless — that’s retarded.

    putting 250 million people out of work and sending money to bolster transgender operations overseas — that’s retarded.

    Human beings do some pretty retarded things in their short lives on the planet. Making it a crime, even a social crime to call such retardation — is

    well retarded.

    The retarded who actually have mental disabilities, might appreciate the reality that they don’t have to suffer acknowledging the retardation of those of who have no such disabilities, but act retarded nonetheless. But I harbor a suspicion that maybe, they are having quite a chuckle at just how retarded we are.

    And dangerous

  185. Mr. Anglin is basically the Vaush of the low IQ right wingers. Bruh, you got the same politics as BLM, DSA, and the 1619 project peddlers, you ain’t no threat to the ruling class. Greenwald has gotten slightly better over the years, but he’s still just a pretty standard liberal.

    “But Hooch, the Jews and Demonrats totally support BLM and DSA, bruh”

    Yea, thats how the capitalist elite play each side against one another bruh, they boost racial and identity politics to get each side backed into their own corner, create boogeymen that you are fearful and suspicious of, then appear to favor one over the other. This serves to divide the groups further, and cause each side to double down on the rhetoric and extremism. This is how divide and conquer works, read a book nigga. None of this is natural or accidental. You think its a coincidence that the CIA and financial elite want to push young white men towards fascism? Hahahaha. They’ve done it all before!

    The CIA and the Ford/Rockefeller foundations have been working this race and gender identity politics for a long time now, back then it was used to turn the American and European socialists against the Soviet Union, nowdays its used to prevent discussion of class and economics. Plus it really pisses the conservative leaning folks off, bonus.

    Don’t play their game bruh, you will lose. Don’t be a puppet, get back to your video games Mr. Anglin. Racial politics is bourgeoisie politics bruh. The only good thing about racial/identity politics is being useful for identifying the idiots and provocateurs among us. You are doing “Da Jews” dirty work for them Mr. Anglin! You and every cracka here is a nigger in the eyes of the capitalist elite, and yes, that includes your hero Trump! Haha

  186. @Joel Ryan

    Yes, you want Anglin silenced. When you show up first day at university Pre-Cal class and professor tells you you need remedial help, that is not a compliment. He is not moving you forward. In fact he is kicking you out of his class because your skills and intelligence are not adequate for the course work. He is not going to invite you to stand before the class and and solve the equation for ‘X.’ Anglin is a brilliant writer while you prove yourself dull, yet you feel qualified to disqualify him. Did your rabbi encourage that attitude? Did he also bugger you and turn you into a twink?

    • Agree: Twodees Partain
    • Disagree: Skeptikal
  187. @Felicity

    ‘We must pray that [Greenwald] stops being a pervert, committing that sin which cries to heaven for vengeance. I shudder to think of it.’

    A word of advice, Felicity: Don’t knock it till you’ve tried it…

  188. Read the article. All I can say is ‘Rat row. Ditto, Rush.’

    Seriously, it was good.

  189. Mark. says:
    @GeeBee

    I think you misunderstand Christianity and what it means for western thought and Western Civilization.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  190. Art: “Personal rights came about through Christian peoples intellectually agreeing to give each other the freedom of speech and assembly. Until that happened there was only vertical tribal hierarchical organization, based around biological prowess.”

    Total, ahistorical nonsense. Pagan Iceland had a parliament called the Althing:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Althing

    Also, see Tacitus’ Germania. Wiki:

    In chapter 7, Tacitus describes their government and leadership as somewhat merit-based and egalitarian, with leadership by example rather than authority, and punishments are carried out by the priests. He mentions (chapter 8) that the opinions of women are given respect. In chapter 11, Tacitus describes a form of folk assembly rather similar to the public Things recorded in later Germanic sources: in these public deliberations, the final decision rests with the men of the group as a whole.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_(assembly)

    Art: “Your anger and hate are showing. They diminish you.”

    You’re projecting again. Not that hate and anger are bad things though. Imo, we need more of each. Give hate and anger a chance, I say. Also war and genocide. Give them a chance too! I got a list.

  191. BlackFlag says:
    @Shamil

    Your story is reasonable except for the part about bad coffee. How can it be that you can’t find good coffee?

  192. utu says:
    @israel shamir

    The full sentence:

    These hall-monitor reporters are a major factor explaining why tech monopolies, which (for reasons of self-interest and ideology) never wanted the responsibility to censor, now do so with abandon and seemingly arbitrary blunt force: they are shamed by the world’s loudest media companies when they do not.

    Another manipulation by Shamir.

    • Replies: @Anon
  193. @Rocha

    This is all true and quite easily verifiable. Hilaire Belloc frequently made the same point in his voluminous writings.

  194. Andrew Anglin is a genius. For the simple reason that in an world where truth and reality itself has been inverted, and therefore many are unknowingly in thrall to evil, he sees what is going on clearly and reports on it in a way that is accessible to everyone. I almost think he is a prophet, but he has simply retained the natural ability to see reality clearly and explain it in such a way that it becomes obvious to everyone. He is certainly bringing people to God, but a huge part of that is that he is bringing people back to reality, to the obvious, to common sense. God bless him. He is doing so much more for the white race, than most people realize. History will remember him. Most importantly, he offers valuable guidance to our boys. I love him.

  195. JWalters says:
    @israel shamir

    I agree Greenwald is whacking the low handing fruit. But from his interview with Matt Taibbi, I see him as inching his way toward the main targets, e.g. CIA.
    “Glenn Greenwald On Censorship + Neera Tanden’s Greatest Hits | Useful Idiots”

    As he says, everybody is afraid. Specifically, in my view, they are afraid to talk about the control center of this highly coordinated corporate empire, because it is so dangerous. If we follow the money we arrive at a mafia of financiers in the City of London, explained well in
    “The Great Red Dragon Or London Money Power” by L. B. Woolfolk, 1890.
    https://ia801200.us.archive.org/17/items/LondonMoneyPowerGreatRedDragonWoolfolk1890/London%20Money%20Power%20Great%20Red%20Dragon%20Woolfolk%201890.pdf

    How this mafia uses their financial dominance to plunder the resources of foreign countries, using their home country’s military, through controlling their government and media, is explained in
    “Imperialism. A Study” by John Hobson, 1902, especially in Part I of Chapter IV: “Economic Parasites of Imperialism”.
    https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/hobson-imperialism-a-study

    The primary members of this mafia are Jewish, which is why Israel is their pet project, and is immune from criticism by mainstream pundits and politicians. More on the head of this dangerous octopus and its tentacles in Britain and America is in
    “War Profiteers and Israel’s Bank”
    https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-israels-bank.html

    I see quite a few people in the press and politics who seem like they are dancing around this topic, but are simply too afraid to go there alone. Put plainly, they are afraid of being assassinated.
    “American Pravda: Mossad Assassinations: The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?”
    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-mossad-assassinations/

    • Thanks: ziggurat
  196. @Rocha

    How do you know Lula is/was corrupt? What made Lula so popular?

  197. GeeBee says:
    @Rocha

    You are right in everything you say, and I am of course familiar with good old Cobbett. Anthony Ludovici revered him, and actually wrote one of his own books under the nom-de-plume ‘Cobbett’, namely his Jews and the Jews in England of 1938 (one understands his reason given the date and the subject matter).

    In terms of my comment I felt that I’d be better confining myself to a core event which beyond doubt cemented the triumph of materialism over traditionalism, otherwise it would have been more of a monograph than a comment. But of course, as you rightly state, Henry VIII’s ‘nationalising’ the church lands and selling them (occasionally actually giving them away) to those he trusted, did indeed establish a new component to the old aristocracy, which led in no small part to the Grand Rebellion. This was and still is often referred to as the ‘landed gentry’. They were the nouveau riches portion of the English upper-class who, along with the Puritans it must be added, agitated for the removal of the Stuart kings, and who, as you rightly observe, facilitated the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688.

    I don’t know if you are English (I am) but there is still today, among the aristocracy, an understanding that the old families (pre Henry VIII) are the ‘real’ aristocracy. A good chum of mine, for example, recently inherited the family estate in Lincolnshire that has been in his family since William I – almost a thousand years. I have heard him refer to titled neighbours, who came to the peerage in the nineteenth-century, as ‘newcomers’!

    The subject matter of Sir Walter Scott’s Waverley (sub-titled ’tis sixty years ago’) is largely concerned with the ‘new’ (and often far wealthier) aristocracy and their support for the Parliament-installed Hanoverians (upstarts supporting upstarts if you like) at the time of the Jacobite rebellion, while many of the old aristocracy favoured the Stuarts.

    In other words, it is a complex history, that is best distilled into the rather more digestible idea that for all the talk of ‘Left’ vs ‘Right’ in political history, there is really only one crucial bifurcation, that of Traditionalism vs Modernism. The former embodied aristocratic paternalism, and what might be thought of as the spiritual virtues of duty, honour, self-sacrifice, goodness, truth and, yes, beauty, while the latter is concerned solely with materialism and the primacy of money, animated as it is by covetousness, lust, selfishness, greed and rapine. The seventeenth-century in England might therefore be thought of as a crucial point in history, in which Modernism was set on course to supplant Traditionalism, in which the ambitions of the commercial interest gave birth to today’s shoddy Materialism, assisted by the midwife of Puritanism. Or as I like to put it, it saw the merchant installed upon the ruins of throne and altar.

    As for Elizabeth’s workhouses and their descent as far as 1960, that is another story, but I have written too much already! (Except I will share with you a little-known snippet regarding one of those last workhouses closed in 1960: on closure it was bought by the notorious Kray twins and run is a night club. I refer to the one on the east side of what is today the A140 road between Diss and Norwich, close to the village of Pulham Market).

    Thanks again for your excellent comment.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @Rocha
  198. Levtraro says:
    @Dave Bowman

    Just do a search for “Orwell’s list”. Many links will show the evidence. Essentially, the snitch’s list of leftists for the UK Foreign Office was released by the Foreign Office to Timothy Garton Ash, a historian that requested the list (to Jack Straw, British Foreign Secretary) and published an article about it in the NY Review of Books in 2003. The same historian discovered a letter sent by Orwell to the NY commie organ Partisan Review in 1942 where he offered to make a list of rightists. So no, no retraction here. Orwell was a snitch, subreptitiously informing about people he knew and trusted him. You may say he was in real life one of his 1984 characters, not a good one.

    Ok, I did what you should have done before posting your naive comment:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20160305071504/http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2003/09/25/orwells-list/

    • Replies: @DrWatson
  199. Levtraro says:
    @nsa

    I know he died young for today’s standards. I was speaking of HIS old age, sick of tuberculosis, stricken to a hospital bed for months. BTW, thanks for info about the other two snitches.

  200. GeeBee says:
    @Mark.

    On the contrary. I would maintain that it is the great majority of those living under the yoke of Protestant Christianity who understand neither the great debility it has placed upon their lands nor its life-denying curse placed upon each individual.

  201. @Cauchemar du Singe

    “It’s an oblique reference to the current German Leftist Gubbamint prosecuting a 100 year old former camp guard…”
    Yes, indeed.
    I dislike, intensely seeing the geriatric charged etc with “historical” crimes. Shows that “Justice” is about remorseless retribution, not — “justice”.

  202. @Crawfurdmuir

    May be wrong, but I don’t think the UK had a law against female homosexuality for quite some time. Apparently it’s b/c the mere concept was so foreign as to be inexpressible. [?]

    • Replies: @Catdog
  203. Dumbo says:
    @Observator

    Bullshit. Even the Greeks and Romans knew what homosexuality was all about, and yes, they had words for passive sodomy, and it was not exactly well regarded.

    Homosexuals are more prone to disease, to being suicidal, to being serial killers, to die young.

    Homosexuals are to be pitied and helped, not hated, but also not celebrated.

    I know quite a few homosexuals, some can be nice, witty people but their idea of fun is to go to saunas and have oral and anal sex with strangers. And those are the “normal” ones. You don’t want to hear what those a bit more kinky like to do.

    Most people who didn’t like Anglin’s remarks are probably homosexuals.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  204. Beyond the noise and confusion, has anyone stopped to ask nigger retards what they think?

  205. Rahan says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    It appears Anglin has been fatally infected with the lethal mind virus of Christianity. It’s probably only a matter of time before he realizes that he can’t serve two masters, and renounces his racist beliefs to please the race-mixing Prince of Peace, the God of Love. Sooner or later he’ll turn up on a Jerry Springer-type show, telling anyone who will listen that he used to be a hater until Jesus showed him that loving Jews and negroes is a better way to go.

    Certainly not the way it went with Roosh, for example. Or anyone else who (re)discovered their Christian heritage over the last 3-4 years. Rather went into the opposite direction, in fact. Theirs is also a rebellion against the castrated evangelical and crypto-evangelical zionist Christianity of the post-WWII West. Which is what you described as them heading towards. Maybe, but for now they appear to be making intensive efforts and paying serious prices while en route into the very much opposite side of the spectrum.

    Anyway, admitting that there are more than enough excellent people who happen to be Jews, or Blacks, or Turks, or Hindus, or what have you, is very sane behavior. It’s jumping to the conclusion “and therefore we must replace ourselves with Turks and Hindus and give up our rights and freedoms” that’s insane, but one certainly does not have to lead to the other.

    In contemporary Russia, for example, it appears to be possible to both publish mainstream books on “the Jewish question” and have Jewish friends. Or be a vocal opponent of Chechen crime gangs, but have a Chechen wife. Or celebrate the three-day 2008 victory against Georgia, but be a regular patron of Georgian restaurants and enjoy Georgian songs.

    The “everything or nothing” approach, as in either “total racial purity”+ “scientific proof of everybody else’s inferiority” or the opposite “we are inherently evil and must replace ourselves with the noble Somalians”–THAT’s insane.

    And yes, the Anglo-Germanic white races seem to be poisoned with this “everything or nothing” insanity on a genetic level, just like Ashkenazi Jews for example are infected with other insanities on a genetic level, but everyone has baggage. The question is can you rise above it? Perhaps the current civilizational purgatory of the West will teach the surviving Anglo-Germanic whites to transcend their genetic defects and amplify their genetic awesomeness, instead of psychopathically jumping from “must enslave and exterminate inferiors” to “must kiss their feet and give them my stuff” and back again.

    Just like excellent Jews, Slavs, Hispanics, Celts, and Arabs (and gays and sadomasochists) are capable of transcending their inborn defects and become self-actualizing free beings.

    Being skeptical of organized Jews and their hoaxes does not have to mean “you hate Jews”.
    Being skeptical of black crime and IQ potential does not have to mean “you hate blacks”.
    Being skeptical of the agendas of organized gay and transvestite and feminist groups does not have to mean “you hate gays”, or dudes in wigs, or fat women with blue hair.

    That’s GloboHomo bullshit, that you can only be one or the other. We all have been infected with this bullshit at some point, but hey, we also visit sites such as this one here, in order to shake the programming off.

    Anyway, Isaac Asimov and Robert Silverberg are terrific. So is Israel Shamir, so is David Cole, so is Mr. Unz.

    Ben Shapiro, not so much.

    • Thanks: Dumbo, HeebHunter
    • Replies: @Dumbo
  206. Thim says:

    Wanglin is a bit naive, and no practitioner of free speech. He banned all of us from his site who were opposing the Capitol Storm. Tried to warn them it was a trap, and got banned, so it’s bizarre to see Wanglin posing as a defender of free speech.

    Now people are getting arrested, or are about to be arrested, because Wanglin told them to go to the FBI’s event on January 6. People on the board were being told, if you don’t go you are a faggot.

    Greenwald is Intel, always has been. Tucker, unfortunately is “former” CIA, but there are actually no former CIA. I like Tucker, and I think he should be CIA director, but like Greenwald, he dwells in that world.

    A crafty one Ron Unz is, hanging Wanglin’s name around Greenwald’s neck. I like it.

  207. noname27 says: • Website
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Oh yes the spook connection does not surprise me at all.

    Have no fear, once I ‘out’ someone I avoid them like the plague. Thanks for your input.

  208. DanFromCT says:

    . . . dangerous losers like [Joel “Ryan”], a combination of uber-sensitive snowflake and viciously efficient gauleiter.

    Exactly, and as Samuel Johnson observed of their kind, they have the unspeakable cruelty only the worst sort of cowards are capable of when the tables are turned. The 900 pages of The Black Book of Communism are an insight into America’s leftist Jews’ capability for unspeakable horrors as much as a record of their great grandparents’ acts as the butchers of the abattoirs a century ago in Russia.

    At least we’ve having a good laugh at how these effeminate losers behave in the catbird seat, or seeing who they really are, such as with Jeffrey Toobin, who exposed an entire class as much as himself. It defies belief that these rootless cosmopolitans have no power and never have without the police they hate and call pigs kissing their ass and taking out their cruelty on the innocent so the Brian Stelters whom they serve need not.

  209. noname27 says: • Website
    @The Soft Parade

    James 4:17 (KJV) Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

    Romans 1:32 (KJV) Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

  210. The problem is that in the name avoiding offense we have manufactured some terms that are essentially universal in what they mean and turned them. The use of the term retarded is not a reference about people with mental disabilities in negative light unless it placed in said context.

    It is not akin to the “n-word” in its implications or usage.

    The Mcneil incident as it turns out was something much richer in tone and from the details of the conversations, that becomes very clear. In general name calling should be voided. But trolling the earth looking for offense is not required. But ears pricked up for the next and every “n word” as though all name calling was equal —

    tad over zealous.

    Laugh, it’s hard to imagine taking etiquette language cues from New Yorkers or Hollywood.

  211. Juvenalis says:
    @Dumbo

    Even Judaism? The desert cult of Judaism invented the Puritanical obsession with homosexuality as “sin” (in fact pretty much all sexuality as sin, the same reason both Jews and fundamentalist Protestants in America came up with the idea of chopping off newborn baby boys’ foreskins to attempt to stop them from sexual pleasure as adolescents/adults), Judeo-Christians’ favorite passages on homosexuality as “sin” literally come from the Jewish Torah, from a book full of deranged ridiculous rules on purity for the Jewish priestly class (Levites). No indigenous European religion shared the Abrahamic desert cult Puritan obsession with sexuality as “sin”.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  212. Catdog says:

    Christian White men- who were, on average, far more devout than the average Christian White man living today- conquered the globe with wooden ships and bronze cannons. They were both Catholic and Protestant. The assertion that Christianity caused the White collapse, when Christianity itself is at its nadir, is retarded.

    • Agree: Twodees Partain
  213. Catdog says:
    @animalogic

    It’s probably because there is no such thing as female homosexuality.

  214. partacus says:

    Greenwald is a typical jewish conservative and his writing as toothless and insipid as Shapiro’s. This article only makes me conclude the Daily Stormer is an FBI baiting op.
    I will never read Anglin or Greenwald from today.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  215. HZ says:

    Glad to see mr. Anglin here. He’s got the spiciest takes.

  216. @Ghali

    “Apartheid, Rogue, Terrorist State”: Glenn Greenwald on Israel’s Murder of Gaza Protesters, Reporter

    • Replies: @Ghali
  217. GeeBee says:
    @dimples

    In which case you believe in the propaganda as opposed to the truth. Anyone who immerses themselves in impartial research into the holyhoax religious mania cannot but emerge from it with their belief in this propaganda intact. I did so , and it changed my mind entirely.

    As for the number of Jews who were killed by the Third Reich for being Jews, let me quote David Irving. He memorably stated at one of his lectures: “more people died in Senator Ted Kennedy’s car at Chappaquiddick than were gassed to death at Auschwitz”.

  218. schrub says:

    The article by Greenwald is much less than it initially appears because it only mentions lower level flunkies and not the bosses who hired and encouraged then to run amuck. It is like blaming the dishwasher for a bad restaurant meal. Talk about low hanging fruit!

    Here are some of the groups and individuals we should hear far more criticisms of. The first two choices are well known and obvious, the third definitely isn’t.

    1) The New York Times Newspaper which has been misinforming the American public about the ZOG’s activities ever since the Sulzberger family took it over in 1896. It is still American’s newspaper of record despite using its malignant influence to push the US into two world wars. Despite this, it is still “America’s newspaper of record”. Why?

    2) The Anti-defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) which has been actively harassing gentiles’ right to free speech ever since it was founded way back in 1913. It was the ADL that single-handedly invented the concept known as “hate speech”. It has been the ADL that has had a long history, going all the way back to its founding, of encouraging the organized doxxing of its enemies’ families and their businesses. During the Trump presidency, it was the ADL that directly supplied MSM with many or most its talking points opposing the Trump regime.

    While the first two choices are fairly well known, our third choice isn’t. This time it is a particular person, not a group:

    3) That individual is Larry Fink. Who is Fink you ask? You can’t understand much of our current situation without knowing about him. He is the head of the immensely powerful, 8.6 trillion dollar large, Blackrock Investment Company whose exchange traded index funds (ETFs) now control immense blocs of voting shares on many (or most) large American corporations boards of directors.

    Fink has been quoted as bragging that it was he who had threatened corporate heads that if their companies did not display sufficient “woke-ness” during or recent era of nationwide riots that he would use his voting bloc shares to simply remove them from their positions while at the same time organizing boycotts of their products. Fink is probably the main reason that American companies, many of them led by Republicans, ended up caving in and donating to groups like Black Lives Matter and in some cases even Antifa. Fink is probably the major reason why “diversity” rather than profits has become the main theme of terrified American corporations. It was also Fink that was the primary voice pushing formerly right wing American corporation to donate to Biden’s campaign.

    BTW, Fink probably has deep connections into selection #2,the ADL as well since both Blackrock’s and the ADL’s press releases on social issues look remarkably similar. In many cases they appear to have been written by the same hand.

    Remember that name, Larry Fink. Fink is far more important than any powerless and easily disposable reporter of the type that people like Greenwald like to grouse about. They are simply minor cogs in the wheel. Fink is most definitely one of the wheels.

    • Thanks: Craig Nelsen
  219. Dumbo says:
    @Juvenalis

    I disagree, fertility cults notwithstanding, sexuality has always been in opposition to spirituality, vestals needed to be virgins, and there were many restrictions in particular to female sexuality, for obvious reasons. Greece and Rome were extremely patriarchal. As for homosexuality, well, I guess there are some homosexual alt-right LARPer types who dream of muscular Spartan soldiers covered in oil….

    But being the sodomized part had obvious negative connotations, even back then:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catullus_16

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Anonymous
  220. Glenn Greenwald is a true American hero. Okay, a Brazilian hero who fights for American founding principles. Nobody savages social media censorship and mainstream media complicity more consistently and savagely than him, and nobody articulates it as well. I could care less his true motivations. Maybe he is butthurt over previous treatment by media insiders and his stance is really just a personally motivated vendetta. A man is defined by his actions and stated positions, not by your unproven suspicions of his underlying motives. It’s too bad that Andrew Anglin was compelled right at the beginning to make sure everyone knew that Greenwald is a “homosexual Jew.” It’s idiotic. Any intelligent people here should consider added commentary like that beneath them. It’s unreasonable anti-intellectual bullshit.

    I visit Unz regularly for its relatively unfiltered news and opinions. I wish many here would wise up and cease all these idiotic blanket statements about Jews. I agree that there is an Israel-firster cabal in our government that has for decades seriously compromised the health of our faux republic. But the people I’m talking about are not privileged power center swamp creatures like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Eliot Abrams, and other 21st century American traitors (including Christian Zionist shills like Mike Pompeo and Ted Cruz). I’m talking about average, regular, everyday Jews who have regular jobs not all that unlike most of the readers here, I’d wager. Nitpick the definition of “regular” all you want. You know what I mean. I know many such Jews and they’re just as generous and friendly, on average, as the average non-Jew down the block. I know firsthand because I have the misfortune of living in a highly Jewish town. Why do I say “misfortune” and stand up for Jews at the same time? It’s because I’m not Jewish and the rather orthodox Jewish culture here isn’t my own. I don’t belong. The Jewish domination has ramifications for public schools. None of their kids go, which starves public schools of their academic work ethic and leaves primarily black and Latino students (the two groups with the worst academic performance by far). Asians never live in Jewish towns like this, so schools are also starved of their brainpower. In short, social life here sucks (music, restaurants, etc), I don’t belong to the very tight and exclusionary Jewish culture, and the schools are at best subpar thanks to the lack of whites, Asians, and Jews. As we know, any entity that’s nearly all black/Latino qualifies as “diverse” to our MSM propagandists and their parrots on school boards.

    So, I don’t like living in this Jewish town. That doesn’t mean I don’t like Jews. I have Jewish friends who are very intelligent and generous. They will invite my family into their homes in the rare moments they’re not hurriedly scuttling off to sabbath or something with the rest of their tribe. They’re just regular people who, while supportive of Israel, aren’t part of a mustache/payot twirling conspiracy to eliminate all non-Jewish white people as a political and intellectual force in Europe and the USA. That conspiracy may indeed exist among the TRUE power centers in the Israeli and American governments, as well as among the disgusting billionaires like Soros and Adelson who fund them (even beyond the grave).

    I think Unz readers and commenters would be wise to remember the distinction between a people and the actions of their government. I’m appalled by the USA’s disastrous interventions and murder in Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, to name just a few of recent note. But I don’t feel “responsible” for that, even if it chips at the little bit of American pride I have left. Similarly, you shouldn’t equate all Jews with the Israeli government and their supportive, wretched shills who enable them in our government. Enough with these idiotic swipes, especially in an article of praise for a person’s actions like this one. If Glenn Greenwald has been involved in undermining the USA in a fundamental way that’s obviously motivated by his Jewish/Israeli allegiance, then say so directly and cite the evidence. If not, try to resist these dumb qualifiers like “homosexual Jew” that only feed into the perception of equally idiotic people who will automatically label you a Nazi for it. Do you want to be better than that or are you content to be viewed by outsiders as knuckledragging, bigoted morons? (note: I’m talking about perception of others here, not my opinion)

  221. Miro23 says:
    @GeeBee

    … there is really only one crucial bifurcation, that of Traditionalism vs Modernism. The former embodied aristocratic paternalism, and what might be thought of as the spiritual virtues of duty, honour, self-sacrifice, goodness, truth and, yes, beauty, while the latter is concerned solely with materialism and the primacy of money, animated as it is by covetousness, lust, selfishness, greed and rapine.

    Aristocratic paternalism was much weakened (it wasn’t working) by the time it arrived in the 20th Century – but it still held power – and it had reached a decadent state. For example, by 1914 Great Britain had a mostly useless upper class – aesthetes, orientalists and some inflexible and delusional military leaders, clouded by the idea of the natural superiority of the “Englishman”. Same story in Czarist Russia with its endless rounds of aristocratic entertainment, balls, hunting parties and disdain for “their villages” which they never visited as a point of pride.

    I’m not disagreeing that the modern combination of money primacy, lust, greed, selfishness and sleaze is toxic – but the degenerate aristocracy prepared the ground for its own overthrow.

    For me, the situation pre WW1 was nicely summed up in two books on the same subject (expeditions to the South Pole ) – both written by participants – one recounting the British expedition led by Scott, Apsley Cherry-Garrard “The Worst Journey in the World”, and the other the Norwegian expedition led by Amundsen Roald Amundsen “The South Pole: An Account of the Norwegian Antarctic Expedition in the Fram, 1910-1912” :

    From my notes after reading them (at about the same time):

    SCOTT – An example of the way that British Imperial machismo had lost touch with reality at the start of the 20th century. Scott’s Antarctic expedition relies to an inordinate degree on Englishmen Pulling Through as a justification for bad preparation and bad decisions such as his famous man pulled sledges. Cherry-Garrard accepts that Scott’s death was a national tragedy and example of heroism, while at the same time showing in detail the rotten organization of this expedition in which he took part.

    AMUNDSEN – Amundsen relies on very careful preparation and training, using an experienced team + a great respect for the conditions. Everything works right for him in this excellent account of turn of the century polar exploration.

    The interesting point, is that both expeditions were animated by nationalist sentiments. But Scott’s were of the decadent imperialistic type while Amundsen’s were realistic and serious – strictly following survival rules.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  222. Anonymous[905] • Disclaimer says:
    @Marshall Lentini

    They are made by the same type of bottom-feeders mentioned in the article..

  223. Gwen says:
    @Rahan

    Thank you for this comment. I’ve cut and pasted it to keep along with the responses from GeeBee and Rocha. I echo @One-off’s comment also.

  224. Mefobills says:
    @WJ

    They slaughtered the continent’s megafauna over the 1000 years of their initial occupation . I don’t get to see a sabre tooth tiger, a giant ground sloth or a wooly mammoth due their 1000 year long bbq.
    ___________________

    That is probably myth. Human populations, especially stone age Amerindians, were too small and did not have industrial scale killing techniques to wipe out megafauna.

    https://www.iflscience.com/environment/did-a-comet-impact-cause-massive-wildfires-that-extended-the-ice-age/

    There is a growing body of data suggesting the Comet hypothesis; and this body of data includes geological evidence such as the earth being scoured by torrential floods. Something odd happened 12000 years ago, and it wasn’t the Amerindians.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  225. Rahan: “The “everything or nothing” approach, as in either “total racial purity”+ “scientific proof of everybody else’s inferiority” or the opposite “we are inherently evil and must replace ourselves with the noble Somalians”–THAT’s insane. ”

    Yes, of course. Wanting your own race to survive and taking steps to ensure it does is INSANE. Wanting a racially mixed society such as you envision, and in fact, such as we have now (and we can see how well it’s working out), THAT is the only sanity. The fact that such societies are always in turmoil and result in the death of discrete races is a mere detail. It’s a feature, not a bug, according to you.

    This is the sort of meritocratic bullshit for which Christianity provides a rationale. It’s the race-mixing foundation of empire that once destroyed the Romans and is now happening again.

    • Replies: @Rahan
  226. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Your God is a folie en masse, a collective hallucination. Good, truth, dignity, and honor preceded his invention and will exist long after he’s been forgotten.

    Indeed!

    I’ll add that concepts of fairness and “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” exist as simple matters of human principle whether promoted by an organized religion or not. Plenty of non-religious people abide by them.

  227. @Johnny Nada

    I visit Unz regularly for its relatively unfiltered news and opinions. I wish many here would wise up and cease all these idiotic blanket statements about Jews. I agree that there is an Israel-firster cabal in our government that has for decades seriously compromised the health of our faux republic. But the people I’m talking about are not privileged power center swamp creatures like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Eliot Abrams, and other 21st century American traitors (including Christian Zionist shills like Mike Pompeo and Ted Cruz).

    I agree with that whole statement. Regarding the part I bolded, and given the fact that Israel has many non-Jewish shills, as you say, perhaps the proper identifying term should simply be: Zionists.

    Any halfway aware person would understand who is being identified. And not all Jews are Zionists so, the term doesn’t mean ‘Jew’.

    (Btw, I think some get a little obsessed because as long as they have boogeyman to point a finger at, it absolves them from doing anything about the problems. Weak!)

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  228. @Mefobills

    That is probably myth. Human populations, especially stone age Amerindians, were too small and did not have industrial scale killing techniques to wipe out megafauna.

    That didn’t require industrial scale killing techniques.

    American Indians would set forest fires to make it easier to hunt game animals. It is suspected that is what happened in Australia.
    https://theconversation.com/did-fire-kill-off-australias-megafauna-19679

    But yes I realize this isn’t taught in the typical history course where American Indians are depicted as completely innocent natives that live in ecological harmony with the earth.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  229. @Dumbo

    I disagree, fertility cults notwithstanding, sexuality has always been in opposition to spirituality, vestals needed to be virgins, and there were many restrictions in particular to female sexuality, for obvious reasons.

    That is not a universal pattern.

    Numerous religions have had gods of fertility where female sexuality was celebrated.

    I sometimes wonder if the problems with female sexuality are in fact related to the Abrahamic religions trying so hard to control it. This could crudely be described as the Catholic slut phenomenon.

    You make sex a forbidden fruit and it just becomes all the more tempting.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @Miro23
  230. Just because someone’s able to eloquently write and talk, should not excuse them for using an anal cavity for a vagina. I can’t think of any other species in nature that is obsessed with same sex partnering, gender mutilation or trans humanism.
    Keep it in the closet, it’s not normal.

  231. @Dumbo

    I know quite a few homosexuals, some can be nice, witty people but their idea of fun is to go to saunas and have oral and anal sex with strangers. And those are the “normal” ones. You don’t want to hear what those a bit more kinky like to do.

    This is similar to my experience. The men tend to be crassly perverted while the women tend to be bitter.

    The everyday homo on TEEVEE that is completely normal in every way is an aberration. Mr. American who just happens to have a husband at home. Yea right.

    Billions upon billions are spent each year because so many gays insist on multiple partners and unprotected sex. Lesbians are actually quite monogamous. Amusingly I have seen liberals blame gay promiscuity on mainstream society. Your prejudicial attitude made them take part in group sex. But not for lesbians.

  232. @Joel Ryan

    “…juvenile and bigoted.”

    Pfft, Andrew the Lemon Head is actually too soft on you kikes and like most racially ambigous inhabitants of the new world, still cant say national socialist properly.

    For me, you have no idea what is coming, yid.

    • LOL: 36 ulster
  233. Anonymous[144] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dumbo

    “But being the sodomized part had obvious negative connotations, even back then:”

    But important to note that Catullus wanted to fuck the other guys, to sodomize them. It was an accepted way for Roman men to express their virility.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  234. Dumbo says:
    @John Johnson

    You make sex a forbidden fruit and it just becomes all the more tempting.

    I thought the hippie movement and other 70s fads had thought everyone that “free love” doesn’t work? (Or at least, not for most).

    I agree that the idea of constant sex with anyone you like can be tempting, but most people are ugly, fat or not really that attractive to each other.

    Numerous religions have had gods of fertility where female sexuality was celebrated.

    Modernity is, well, I wouldn’t call it a “fertility cult”, more an “anti-fertility” cult with abortion and all that, but, free female sexuality is certainly celebrated. The results are not good so far…

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  235. Dumbo says:
    @Anonymous

    It was an accepted way for Roman men to express their virility.

    But that’s true even today. Do you think that guys who rape other men in prison think of themselves as “gay”? In many third-world countries, being the active part is not considered homosexuality, at least, not in theory (variations of Cathullus insults are common).

    So, I don’t think that much has changed. Except that now we pretend that “love is love” and that gay couples behave exactly the same way as heterosexual couples.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Anonymous
  236. Dumbo says:
    @Rahan

    The “everything or nothing” approach, as in either “total racial purity”+ “scientific proof of everybody else’s inferiority” or the opposite “we are inherently evil and must replace ourselves with the noble Somalians”–THAT’s insane.

    “Either at your throat or at your feet” is another way of putting it.

    LOL. I don’t know about anglos, but that seems to be the German mentality. For all their admirable qualities, they are not known as a people with lots of nuance and flexibility.

    Except, this “everything or nothing” is really the same thing; their constant obsession today about phantom “nazis” is just the reverse of their previous obsession. I don’t think it’s really “tolerance” or even true interest in other races that motivates them, but just that there is a certain authoritarian mentality and that there are things you are not supposed to question.

    Leni Riefehnstal started celebrating the Aryan body and then ended up taking pictures of some tribes in Africa and celebrating them too. Did she change? Or just what was accepted and had to be celebrated change?

    • Agree: Miro23
    • LOL: Rahan
  237. GeeBee says:
    @Miro23

    Aristocratic paternalism was much weakened (it wasn’t working) by the time it arrived in the 20th Century – but it still held power – and it had reached a decadent state.

    I certainly wouldn’t disagree with this. I quoted Ludovici earlier, and he makes this very point most trenchantly in his A Defence of Aristocracy – A Text Book for Tories (2nd edition, 1933), in which he states that the British aristocracy fully deserved to be marginalised by the Parliament Act of 1911. This does not, however, detract from his thesis that when it works properly – as it did in large part in past times, and more so prior to the Tudors – it was an excellent system of governance.

    I always like to cite Benjamin Disraeli in this regard, who, in a speech he made to parliament in 1842 in defence of the corn laws, said:

    “When [in 1066] the Conqueror carved out parts of the land, and introduced the feudal system, he said to the recipient, “You shall have that estate, but you shall do something for it: you shall feed the poor; you shall endow the Church; you shall defend the land in case of war; and you shall execute justice and maintain truth to the poor for nothing. It is all very well to talk of the barbarities of the feudal system, and to tell us that in those days when it flourished a great variety of gross and grotesque circumstances and great miseries occurred but these were not the result of the feudal system; they were the result of the barbarism of the age. They existed not from the feudal system, but in spite of the feudal system. The principle of the feudal system, the principle which was practically operated upon, was the noblest principle, the grandest, the most magnificent and benevolent that was ever conceived by sage, or ever practised by patriot.”

    Far more recently, I personally recall those vestiges of aristocratic paternalism from my own experiences, which are many. When staying at an old girlfriend’s parents’ estate in Hampshire many years ago, for example, her father and I would often, on Sunday mornings, get in his Land Rover and drive to his head gamekeeper’s cottage to discuss the upcoming shooting days. The keeper’s little cottage was neat and comfortable, and always had logs for the fire from the estate at no charge. His employer, my girlfriend’s father, paid all bills, and gave the keeper and his wife much in the way of food from the estate. The cottage was naturally in great contrast to the large and superb William & Mary house that formed the hub of the estate, and which had been in my girlfriend’s father’s family for many generations, replete as it was wit butler, housekeeper, cook and various maids. Unlike his master, however, the keeper had few worries and absolute security of tenure (which continued after he retired) A happier man I never met.

    I could recount numerous similar examples, but the point of them all is that until very recently – and even today – there are such examples of this paternalism being discharged out of a sense of noblesse oblige on the part of the ‘squire’.

    This of course leads to an understanding of what Carlyle was getting at when he wrote, in his Shooting Niagara (1867):

    Our accepted axioms about ” Liberty,” ” Constitutional Government,” ” Reform,” and the like objects, [might] begin to be suspected as perhaps only conditionally true; that taken unconditionally, or under changed conditions, they are not true, but false and even disastrously and fatally so. Ask yourself about ” Liberty,” for example; what do you really mean by it, what in any just and rational soul is that Divine quality of liberty? That a good man be ” free,” as we call it: that he be permitted to unfold himself in works of goodness and nobleness, is surely a blessing to him and to those about him. But that a bad man be “free,” permitted to unfold himself in his particular way, is contrariwise the fatallest curse you could inflict on him and all his neighbours.
    ‘Him the very Heavens call upon you to persuade, to urge, induce, compel, into something of well-doing; but if you absolutely cannot – if he will continue in ill-doing – then for him (I can assure you, though you will be shocked to hear it), the one “blessing” left is the speediest gallows you can lead him to.

    Or as Oscar Levy (under whom Ludovici studied as a young man and who, incidentally, was Jewish) described these bogus cries of ‘Liberté, égalité, fraternité’ from the French Revolution:

    “The Ideal of Democracy contained in this appeal of the Jews to the people was their successful battle cry, their most wonderful propaganda work, their Deus vult! that finally forced the world to follow them. With it they have inspired—or, if you will, infected—Lollards and Hussites, Protestants and Puritans, Socialists and Bolshevists alike. Now Democracy, as we all know, declares—or pretends to proclaim— everybody free and equal: it was therefore bound to destroy the bond, feudal or patriarchal, between lord and serf, master and servant, and it replaced it, had to replace it, by another bond (a bond it had to invent for the occasion) that of wages and salaries. Democracy, as we all know, abolished slavery—that natural slavery in which the master took an interest in his slaves, because they were part and parcel of his most valuable property; but it re-introduced it in the form of Wage Tyranny, by means of which the ” freed ” serf could be freely exploited and even squashed out like a lemon without any harm being done to the Master’s interests. Thus ended this glorious liberty principle of the Reformation and the Revolution: the finest theory that has ever been invented for the most miserable of all practices, that have ever defiled this world. No doubt the Jews are responsible for this, as they are responsible for everything, because they are the spiritual fathers of Democracy and therefore of plutocracy.”

    The world of Modernism, as you rightly state, is toxic.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  238. JM says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    The Far Left have a very long history of expressing a policy of “no rights of free speech to fascists”. Of course they define “fascist” to suit their broader purposes. Their behavior against Trump’s rights is just the latest. They howled down/closed meetings/etc way back…Enoch Powell…Hans Eysenck…David Irving…etc etc, and nationalist politicians in many countries have all fallen victim to these bastards. Schadenfreude is the appropriate response to the latest assertion of historic “justice” that befell members of the the equally misnamed ‘SEP’.

  239. DrWatson says:
    @Levtraro

    Orwell was a snitch, subreptitiously informing about people he knew and trusted him. You may say he was in real life one of his 1984 characters, not a good one.

    I outright reject your slanderous notion that our hero (and here I speak for the entire former Eastern Bloc), Orwell, was a snitch. If you had taken the time to read the essay you just linked above you could have come to this conclusion yourself: “If the charge is that he was a secret police informer, the answer is plainly no.” http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2003/09/25/orwells-list/

    He was a deeply moral individual, a political genius, who was concerned and warned about the world turning into what it is today. At the beginning of the Cold War (he concocted the term) he foresaw (rightly so, cf. the Rosenbergs) the danger of people in Britain in charge to pass on military secrets to the Soviets.

    Over the last decade, “Orwell’s List” has been the subject of many articles with lurid headlines such as “Big Brother of the Foreign Office,” “Socialist Icon Who Became an Informer,” and “How Orwell’s Blacklist Aided Secret Service.” All this speculative denunciation of the author of 1984 has been based on three incomplete sources: the publication of many (but not all) entries from the strictly private notebook in which Orwell attempted to identify “cryptos” and “F.T.” (his abbreviation for fellow travelers), his published correspondence with Celia Kirwan, and the partial release seven years ago of the relevant files from the Information Research Department of the Foreign Office. But in file FO 1110/189 a card was inserted, next to a copy of Orwell’s letter to Celia of April 6, 1949, saying a document had been withheld.

    That is equally slanderous that “he offered to make a list of rightists” in 1942. (Note the year, blockhead!) What you call “rightists”, is clearly about his other concern that Britain would fall into the hands of Nazis, he equally despised.

    See this link too for a thoughtful essay: https://www.e-ir.info/2012/08/28/wrong-about-orwell-being-on-the-right/

    Orwell was a deeply decent and thoughtful individual, who was true to his ideals to his last breath, unfortunately drawn far too early.

    • Thanks: Brás Cubas
    • Replies: @Levtraro
  240. Rahan says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    There’s a delightful writer, who like all of us has specific bees in his bonnet, and those lately include a serious case of China Derangement Syndrome, but also super narrow race purity views on the USA.

    He has many interesting ideas which lots of people can enjoy without agreeing with the two bees mentioned above (and various others), but in your case it may turn out you’ll appreciate the full package.

    Here’s a recent article on how letting in the Irish was the beginning of the end.
    Enjoy.
    http://www.amerika.org/politics/how-integration-of-an-older-sort-has-failed/

  241. @Dumbo

    Modernity is, well, I wouldn’t call it a “fertility cult”, more an “anti-fertility” cult with abortion and all that, but, free female sexuality is certainly celebrated. The results are not good so far…

    You could say that the act of sex is celebrated while fertility is not.

    What we call modernity certainly isn’t the natural state of things.

    Modernity is heavily influenced by both Christianity and liberalism.

    The latter is more of a secular equality cult that has mixed views on female sexuality.

    Their main goal is to undermine Whites and so they obviously do not want to encourage natural fertility in White women. But they also want to believe they are liberating White women from traditional society.

    So they want to let the genie out of the bottle but not entirely.

    If White women started worshipping a Germanic fertility god the left would be horrified. But why not? It’s anti-Christian and celebrates female sexuality. Isn’t that undermining the Christian patriarchy? Modernism/liberalism is really just an equality cult that will always exist in a state of contradiction because it can’t honestly state what it really wants.

  242. @Dumbo

    In many third-world countries, being the active part is not considered homosexuality, at least, not in theory (variations of Cathullus insults are common).

    Weirdly enough there are Arab subcultures where it is acceptable as long as the male is young.

    So these Arab men have sex with 18 year olds and both sides tell themselves that they aren’t gay.

    As for the Romans the homosexual relations among straight men is exaggerated.

    Upper class Romans could do what they wanted with slaves male or female and it was certainly looked down upon to be on the receiving end. But the upper class was a very small percentage of the population and we don’t know how widespread the practice was. I would guess it to be rare since these same men had access to women.

    It wasn’t like prison or Arab cultures where they don’t have available women.

  243. Miro23 says:
    @John Johnson

    You make sex a forbidden fruit and it just becomes all the more tempting.

    Sort of obviously nature’s plan in promoting the specialness of women, protecting them socially and safeguarding their procreative role. Cover up women – and even if they’re naked their sex is physically hidden.

    It’s taken the counter-cultural destruction of social taboos, the mass use of the internet and shaved pussies to remove the “forbidden fruit” aspect with the resulting boredom and pervasive lack of interest in sex in general.

  244. Miro23 says:
    @GeeBee

    Thanks for that great quote that I’d never heard of:

    Or as Oscar Levy (under whom Ludovici studied as a young man and who, incidentally, was Jewish) described these bogus cries of ‘Liberté, égalité, fraternité’ from the French Revolution:

    “The Ideal of Democracy contained in this appeal of the Jews to the people was their successful battle cry, their most wonderful propaganda work, their Deus vult! that finally forced the world to follow them. With it they have inspired—or, if you will, infected—Lollards and Hussites, Protestants and Puritans, Socialists and Bolshevists alike. Now Democracy, as we all know, declares—or pretends to proclaim— everybody free and equal: it was therefore bound to destroy the bond, feudal or patriarchal, between lord and serf, master and servant, and it replaced it, had to replace it, by another bond (a bond it had to invent for the occasion) that of wages and salaries. Democracy, as we all know, abolished slavery—that natural slavery in which the master took an interest in his slaves, because they were part and parcel of his most valuable property; but it re-introduced it in the form of Wage Tyranny, by means of which the ” freed ” serf could be freely exploited and even squashed out like a lemon without any harm being done to the Master’s interests. Thus ended this glorious liberty principle of the Reformation and the Revolution: the finest theory that has ever been invented for the most miserable of all practices, that have ever defiled this world. No doubt the Jews are responsible for this, as they are responsible for everything, because they are the spiritual fathers of Democracy and therefore of plutocracy.”

    It’s obvious that Putin’s (nationalist) Russia works better for the Russian public that did Yeltsin’s (neoliberal – plutocratic) Russia.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  245. Rocha says:
    @GeeBee

    Thank you very much for your generous comment. You are far more knowledgeable about English history than I am and mix in far more elevated circles.
    William Cobbett’s book was a startling revelation to me as I had previously, without thinking very much about it, swallowed the usual lies about the Reformation and had been left with a very elementary knowledge of the Reformation and it’s consequences.
    For me, the most damning indictment of the Reformation in England was that it resulted in the debt financial system that has enslaved humanity for the last three hundred years and that is something that has been carefully glossed over.
    I am a Catholic and interested in Catholic history but nowhere in the histories I had read previously had this rupture with the previous economic systems been noticed or commented on.
    For me it was as a revelation as I realised that every war and revolution since then has been to impose this nefarious system on the rest of the world including, post 9/11 , the illegal wars being waged by the USA and the UK in the Middle East.
    Because usury is a sin for Muslims too, I believe Iran and Syria are the only countries left in the Middle East without a Rothschilds controlled central bank.
    I believe that the debt based financial system is about to implode and that one of the reasons for the COVID scam was to postpone that day or impose a controlled demolition.
    We are definitely living in interesting times.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @GeeBee
  246. @Johnny Nada

    I agree with your post regarding ordinary Jews. I lurk a lot because I like to read the diversity of opinions here. But like you, I know ordinary Jews who have nothing to do with the cabal/elite and their agenda. Blanket statements of any group just don’t resonate with me. Ordinary people are deceived by the cabal/elite, as we once were. We just need the truth to continue to be told such as happens here on Unz.

  247. @Shamil

    “Discovered?”

    Yes! it was DISCOVERED by the White Christian of European nations… you can quibble over semantics all you want but it ain’t gonna change the history.

    “What are you smoking?”

    Not the same thing your main man “Moe” was (khat) chewing when he mounted a donkey (Yaʽfūr) to fly to Jerusalem.

  248. Anonymous[144] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dumbo

    So, I don’t think that much has changed. Except that now we pretend that “love is love” and that gay couples behave exactly the same way as heterosexual couples.

    Yes, It needs to be said that homosexual love relationships also developed in Rome. Not only “prison sexuality”. For example, the love of the emperor Hadrian for Antinous, was the most intense love story (hetero or homo) in all Roman history.

  249. Mefobills says:
    @John Johnson

    Any stone age people, and especially the Amerindians weren’t namby- pamby hug nature type people.

    Most everybody at UNZ, knows the liberalism is a mental disorder, and what liberals imagine in their febrile brains has nothing to do with reality.

    Amerindian’s favorite form of amusement was to hang others, especially white people, on a trellis, and then torture them. It was stone-age teevee. Only it was interactive, they could do little tortures that didn’t kill right away to string along the viewing pleasure.

    Still, the actual data becoming available now does not point to the Amerindians wiping out America’s megafauna. There was a cataclysmic event, probably a comet.

    Try not to make statements at odds with data and evidence. You lose credibility if you do. Clown world is bad enough without making it worse.

  250. GeeBee says:
    @Miro23

    You’re welcome! It is rather good. I have kept quite a few of Levy’s little gems over the years.

    As for ‘It’s obvious that Putin’s (nationalist) Russia works better for the Russian public that did Yeltsin’s (neoliberal – plutocratic) Russia’ I couldn’t agree more. Today’s Russia and China are hopeful beacons of light for Traditionalists. One has to remind oneself that Western hegemony is rather a recent thing, dating back perhaps 500 years. Russia and China also appear to understand the utterly fatal poison that we in the West have willingly or unwittingly had foisted upon us (a la Levy), in the form of Finance Capitalism.

    Let us look to them to give the Zio-USA what they so richly deserve, and hopefully Europe will have the sense (and not least, the spine) to pivot east.

    • Agree: Mefobills
  251. Mefobills says:
    @The Real World

    I agree with that whole statement. Regarding the part I bolded, and given the fact that Israel has many non-Jewish shills, as you say, perhaps the proper identifying term should simply be: Zionists.

    Jewish usury and predatory methods predate Zionism.

    When Herzyl conceived of Zionism, he wanted a homeland to make jews “normal” people. Herzyl admired the Germans he lived among. My theory is that if he could go forward in time (he died in 1904), and see the horrors his invention spawned, he would never have done it.

    Herzyl’s Zionism merged with Rothschild and finance capitalism at the first Zionist conference in 1897. From then on, usurious money flows out of private banking funded and controlled the movement.

    Jews have been usurers practically since the beginning. I suggest you look beyond Zionism. Usury in Judaism became indurated into religion, especially after the Talmud was written.

    Expulsions from some 108 countries predate Zionism, and Jews were expelled because they were operating the usury mechanism.

    Usury isn’t “interest” on money, it is much more sophisticated constructs, designed to steal productive capital and life energy from producers. There are money system that have positive interest, which relates to productive capital.

    Every attempt at defining usury and limiting the jew, has been met by Jews fighting back, and creating counter narratives, to then allow continuing thefts.

    When Jesus arrived on the scene, it was during the Jubilee year, where the Hillel’s Pharisee class was attempting a creditor take-over by making debts permanent. The Jewish establishment of that era was enjoying extracting permanent tribute in the form of forever debts on their then Jewish population.

    “Super Predator” is a term that comes to mind, and the word “Zionism” does not fit. Zionism was initially a counter to super-predator Jewish behavior, and then Zionism was subsumed.

    • Agree: GeeBee
    • Replies: @The Real World
  252. GeeBee says:
    @Rocha

    Thanks. Yes, I think that many of us on ‘the dissident Right’ had swallowed those same lies about the Reformation, until we had the audacity to peer above the parapet of propaganda! And you are so right in observing that the ‘debt financial system that has enslaved humanity for the last three hundred years…is something that has been carefully glossed over’.

    If only more people would come to see – as you have – that ‘every war and revolution since then has been to impose this nefarious system on the rest of the world’ how much easier would be our task! I began by questioning the orthodox history of World War II, and came to the rather shocking realisation that the Allies’ ‘great victory’ on 8th May 1945 was actually the blackest day in the history of the European-derived people, and it was a concomitant triumph for those same forces who have always benefitted from that same ‘debt financial system’.

    Naturally, having committed such an atrocious crime, the ‘victorious’ Allies had to come up with some excuses. For make no mistake, the Allies’ unspeakable destruction of a civilised and proud nation, that had newly found (or so it thought) a way to free itself from the appalling shackles of usury and exploitation, and to have – for once in recent history – a country of their own, rather than a meekly compliant Jewish satrapy, deliberately set up for extraction and ruin, was a crime without equal in all the long annals of history.

    Armed with this knowledge, we can look at all the nonsense endlessly invoked to justify this litany of horrors with fresh eyes. A veritable moraine of propaganda has, for the past eighty years (starting during the war of course) been spewing from the unending spigot of lies regarding that war. There will never be any progress until and unless a critical mass of people is prepared to put aside all this nonsense, to swallow their pride and admit to having been duped, and to understand that Germany’s only ‘crime’ was to free itself from the stranglehold of that same ‘debt financial system’ all too successfully ushered in after Cromwell’s odious malefactions were visited upon seventeenth century England.

    Well done for seeing so far through the gloom and emerging into the refulgent light of truth!

    • Replies: @Rocha
  253. My evaluation of Glen Greenwald’s writings is that he is a competent journalist. What choices he makes is his affair and the resulting effects as well. I tend to look at his finished products as opposed to looking at his personal choices.

  254. @Mefobills

    Thanks for the info. I think it would be fair to say that the concept of Zionism, or Jewish superiority, existed long before the term was coined and it was only a matter of time before it would become globally coordinated. Herzyl or, no Herzyl.

    Okay, so we can call them ‘globalists’ and, if one wants to specify the particular tribal membership of some, they can identify them as Jewish globalists – which certainly doesn’t mean every Jewish person.

    (Btw, to my mind, one of the worst and orchestrated usury offenses in the USA has been the college debt scam. Simply mind-boggling how that has put a ball and chain on so many young adults AND made college profs and administrators very well-to-do! No accident there.)

    • Agree: Mefobills
  255. Whitewolf says:
    @Dumbo

    I liked this article. Anglin has grown up somewhat.

    Somewhat yes. Some of his articles are top notch but he still throws out the occasional call for forced child marriage or other nonsense to blackwash them.

    He was also very vocal about getting everyone to dc for the fiasco that erupted there on the 6th.

  256. Levtraro says:
    @DrWatson

    I outright reject your slanderous notion that our hero (and here I speak for the entire former Eastern Bloc), Orwell, was a snitch

    Entire Former Eastern Bloc, you forgot to tell that Orwell also gave us proof positive that French chefs do indeed spit on their preparations (“Down and Out in Paris and London”). That was truly heroic.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  257. Rocha says:
    @GeeBee

    Thank you! You don’t happen to have your own blog? I am very impressed with your knowledge and literacy. I would enjoy reading more of your comments.
    I read Hellstorm and I want to hang my hand in shame that I ever swallowed the lies of the ‘good war’.
    At least my Irish ancestors had the wisdom to remain neutral, a sin for which they are now being punished with spiritual, racial, cultural and economic annihilation finishing the work that Cromwell started.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  258. @partacus

    Greenwald is a leftist, so it’s hard to see why you would think of him as a conservative. I doubt that either writer will miss having you as a reader. You don’t have to read what you don’t like. It’s a free country.

    • Replies: @Freedomstillisntfree
  259. @Johnny Nada

    No offense, Johnny, but you’re about the 20th person in this thread to miss the sardonic humor that’s so typical of Anglin. The observation that Glenn is a homosexual jew, who happens to be right, is humor. If you don’t get it, say so.

    • Replies: @Joel Ryan
    , @The Real World
  260. GeeBee says:
    @Rocha

    I used to write regularly for a blog, now sadly ‘de-platformed’, and as of now confine myself to commenting here on Unz. I have also written pieces for ‘Morgoth’s Review’, but that was four or five years ago. Apart from that, I have no other pretensions to being a writer on the subjects we deal with as part of our political movement (if so it can be described).

    I am, however, a published author in quite a different field, having been commissioned to write a two-volume history of a non-related subject more than ten years ago. I enjoy writing (one of the meagre selection of talents I was born with) and might well be tempted to return to the fray if the circumstances appear to be propitious. It is always gratifying to receive encouragement such as you have kindly offered. I do wonder, however, whether in the present climate I expose myself to the machinations of the ‘Thought Police’, who with increasing confidence stalk our benighted lands. Certainly, one stands with Hamlet in discerning that “something is rotten in the state of Denmark”.

  261. GoodTwin says:

    Anglin has been doing some great work in the past year and it is a shame that the tech companies have locked him out from being viewed so effectively. Unz needs more Anglin, preferably some of his content that is more original than this piece which largely quites from Greenwald. There is no shortage of great writing on tge Daily Stormer, please help this man get some exposure Ron.

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  262. @Levtraro

    I don’t know if calling Orwell a “snitch” for compiling that list on his deathbed is appropriate. As the article you linked in your earlier comment shows, his comments were fairly vague. Anyway, almost anyone could have compiled such a list based on what they knew about those named as many of the named did not hide their sympathies. I can imagine that towards the end of his life Orwell wanted to hurt the Stalinists and their sympathisers as revenge for the murder of his comrades in purges behind the front lines in the Spanish Civil War and considering that he barely escaped alive not from the fascists he was fighting but from the communists who were supposedly his fellow fighters, but it was a vain attempt.

  263. GeeBee says:
    @GoodTwin

    Anglin is, of course, stark staring bonkers. But he has an uncanny knack of calling crucial political events aright, and of accurately analysing and indeed predicting our present world and its bizarre trajectory and egregious outcomes. He also has a terse wit, and is exceedingly well informed.

    Apart from the fact that he occasionally ‘jumps horses’ (witness his new-found faith in the Christian god, whereas until about 2017 it was all about our beloved Fuehrer) his is a refreshingly mischievous and prescient take on today’s uniquely puerile tyranny that passes for politics. Let’s have him inside the tent pissing out, rather than outside the tent pissing in, say I.

    • Replies: @Ghan-buri-Ghan
  264. @Icy Blast

    Whenever i see one, i get physically sick.

  265. @Twodees Partain

    Liberal is not the same as leftist.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  266. Mazasapa says:

    What these people all have in common is that they look like they were the last ones chosen for 5th grade kickball.

  267. @Freedomstillisntfree

    Of course it isn’t. ‘Liberal’ is the term that leftists adopted as cover for their opposition to liberalism.

  268. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Good, truth, dignity, and honor preceded his invention and will exist long after he’s been forgotten.

    ‘Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them….

    ‘Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good. So the evening and the morning were the sixth day.’
    Genesis 1: 26, 27, 31 NKJV

    Glory to Him who was, and is, and is to come!

  269. Joel Ryan says:
    @Bill Jones

    Bill Jones, my comment mentioned Anglin’s attempt to be “edgy”, “comically factual” — are you witless enough to argue that these terms don’t explicitly acknowledge the intention to attract attention from the monitors? Are you seriously attempting to defend the morality of saying “despite being a gay Jew”?

  270. Joel Ryan says:
    @Chris in Cackalacky

    How does questioning the relevance of Greenwald’s sexuality or ethnicity make Skeptikal a “supremacist”? I’ve seen some fucked up perspectives on Unz but you’re getting into elevated territory with that one. And no, “all Anglin did” was not just repeat what Greenwald had already told us, he framed it with a “despite being a gay Jew” construction. Big difference.

    • Troll: Twodees Partain
    • Replies: @Chris in Cackalacky
  271. AReply says:

    This is a stranger and more hypocritical than usual Unz article…

    The author praises himself, massively name drops Spleenwald for no other reason that to keep talking about himself, brags about sucking up to influentials, bitches about hall-monitor journalistic gatekeeping, then goes on a vitriolic gatekeeping tirade, all the while lamenting how niggers annoy him, indulging in gay bashing, and dropping 4chan-style mutant Pepe bombs. Then, in a wild rhetorical pelvic thrust he complains how his hated others don’t value freedom of speech, while claiming they also should be censored because they are evil (Nazi alert!) and most deplorably, they serve no redeeming public value. It’s all over the place upside-down and backwards enjoy-every orifice ’til it hurts polemics! It’s so weird and so bad I again wonder if Unz and co. are just training AI and letting it drop little algorithmically formed turds to see how much shit the forum regulars will eat before their high IQs kick in and detect rabbit pellets as they bloviate reminders about how ancient Greeks really understood philosophy and sodomy!

    Great stuff Unz!

  272. @Shamil

    Thats good that you left, but what were you doing here in the first place? This is a Christian country, always has been since it was founded, none if this nonsense you mentioned represents the true culture of this country so it is up to those of us who live here to take back the country. Anyway good luck to you.

  273. @GeeBee

    Anglin is weird. I agree he’s mostly right about things, and he’s actually written some excellent articles. But the constant kindergarten humor and attempts at shock value just become unbearable after a while, and I had to stop reading him because of it. Anglin himself has admitted he doesn’t even like that style of writing and it’s purely a façade to try and appeal to kids or something. Yet he still keeps doing it.

    He also has a tendency to obsessively promote Jew-worshipping morons to his followers for some reason. Examples include Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, and that young Mexican catboy. Fuentes or something like that.

  274. Icy Blast says:
    @Biff

    You’re projecting. “Progressives” want to silence criticism. That’s why they are always threatening their political foes with concentration camps and drone strikes. (And yes, even if you call a concentration camp a “re-education camp” or an “enlightenment center” it’s still a concentration camp.)

  275. Anglin writes thousands of articles every year that receive no treatment here. The one time he says something nice about a slimy Jew, it’s at the top of this site.

  276. Bookish1 says:

    What is with all the attention given to Anglin. All he is doing is giving a parody of people and events. For the true nuts and bolts of what is happening go too Stormfront.org. that is who the iberals and leftists are really afraid of. And that’s why they never mentioned Stormfront because they don’t want people drawn to that site.

  277. Joel Ryan says:
    @Twodees Partain

    Partain, you’re a *haha* racist piece of garbage who *haha* shouldn’t be allowed near a *haha* keyboard to post your obnoxious *haha* intellect-free views, it must be blissful to be so ignorantly bigoted and not even know it *hahahaha*! Just kidding, of course you should be allowed to post, sunlight being the best disinfectant and all. “Despite be a gay Jew” is straight up indefensible but hey, keep trying.

  278. MGB says:
    @MGB

    more of greenwald stiff arming his own investigative journalism. douche bag.

  279. @Joel Ryan

    “Despite be a gay Jew” is straight up indefensible

    How about: “Despite supporting free speech and opposing censorship Glenn Greenwald is a ******* gay Jew.” ? Would that be more acceptable?

  280. @Chris in Cackalacky

    Well said. But this might be Greenwald’s most persuasive article (so far) of 2021.

    https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-false-and-exaggerated-claims

    • Replies: @Chris in Cackalacky
  281. @Chris in Cackalacky

    Well said. And allow me to suggest that below is Greenwald’s best article of 2021 (so far):

    https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-false-and-exaggerated-claims

    • Thanks: Levtraro
  282. @Twodees Partain

    No, it’s not humor, it’s just stupid and makes Anglin look like a cheap hack.

    The statement is passive-aggressive. He can’t just hand Greenwald the compliment/accolade, he has to slug an attempted belittlement at him before acknowledging his good work. It says far more about the author than Greenwald.

    Is Anglin really a 20-something, Southern female?

  283. @Ghali

    I haven’t kept up with Glenn Greenwald in years but my recollection is that he is decidedly pro-Palestinian. In fact, that’s probably how I came across him on twitter back in the day, before the Snowden stuff made him a household name. He’s not *perfect* but at least he isn’t a brazen hypocrite like the vast majority of Jewish leftists.

  284. Sirius says:

    I talk to a lot of people through encrypted messaging apps.

    It made me wonder which encrypted messaging apps you would consider reliable.

  285. Tough Guy says:

    I used to be a homophobic anti-Semite but then I recognized the indefensible nature of my positions and wish I would have recognized the shallow, hateful nature of these positions sooner.

    The opening six words of the essay here are more than just unnecessary. They detract from the praise Glenn Greenwald deserves for his excellent essay.

    Glenn Greenwald’s site just got another subscriber. The internet is, net, a boon for humankind but it does make it more difficult for some good writers to make a living. Rather than be a free rider, I’ll pay for what I expect to be a worthwhile trip.

    I’d write more but need to make a donation for Fred Reed’s most recent, most excellent essay.

  286. Rabb says:

    ““He might be a homosexual Jew” is one of the stupidest opening sentences I’ve ever seen.”

    Apparently, I don’t have enough history here to be able to have clicked ‘agreed’ with the above sentiment …so I copied it.

    Anyway author, work on your personal issues and don’t let them distract from more important things that you write.

  287. @Joel Ryan

    Enough of your pilpul nonsense. If Greenwald can call himself a homosexual Jew, then Anglin can state that Truth as well. If Anglin wants to make a rhetorical point or even insult Greenwald for being a Jew and a homosexual, that is his right. Quit trying to control people Jew!

  288. Che Guava says:
    @Schuetze

    You are also wrong. Most of the big songwriters in 1919 (and before and later) were yids. This is not because they had a particular talent, only because of their nepotism,

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  289. redflame says:

    The more out in the open vitrol against Whites will cause self censoring to spread into the once more free thinking less indoctrinated, less neutered rural class Whites. I’ve already been seeing it. They will literally divert their eyes and nervously shuffle. Scary.

    https://www.persuasion.community/p/americans-are-self-censoring-at-record

    • Agree: Polistra
  290. redflame says:
    @jsinton

    Different strokes for different folks in different times and places, in regards to Christianity. Never know what you’re going to get. It can be utilized into a hell march type guard or poofy rainbow wavers. It’s versatility is one of the positive points. I just prefer plain ole panentheistic/deist blood religion.

  291. Anon[393] • Disclaimer says:
    @utu

    OT: even if not a fan, this zoom presentation (in English) might interest:

    It bored me plenty, because it didn’t say much about the points of interest to me, which are treatment and vaccine.
    A few thoughts:
    – how can an epidemiologist not mention the word “treatment” or lack thereof? It’s relevant to Ro and to any policy proposals.
    – how can an epidemiologist not mention known two-year cycle, even if only to say prediction is impossible given a, b, or c? (Examples: 1918-1919 Spanish Flu, the 1957-1958 Asian grippe, the 1968-1970 Hong Kong grippe, the 2002-2003 SARS Cov 2, the 2009-2010 Swine Flu..)
    – Raoult is always saying we cannot predict, but in the Q&A he does venture into saying why he thinks Covid19 will vanish this year.
    – Ioannidis struck me as a careful establishmentarian. Raoult —whom I admire— has an advanced case of the French Freemason’s disgust with European civilization.

  292. Example of Orwellian communist speech talk: “Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to “connect”over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending(nine months and counting) article commenting”( and keeping users from connecting over interests and passions) LOL—-Yahoo news….

  293. Thinking that was the funniest article of the year is funnier than the actual article, which wouldn’t make the Babylon Bee, let alone the onion. More work on the comedic writing chops, less on the grandiose self promotion, please.

  294. Schuetze says:
    @Che Guava

    I assume you are referring to this sentence:

    It also happened to the Music industry where all the record studios were yid owned going back to the early days of “Rock and Roll”

    Before there was the record industry, there was the sheet music industry. It was also very large, very profitable, and very jew dominated. I concur with your statement. Jews have understood the importance of narrative control for centuries. This is one reason their fangs dig so deep into the bible.

  295. Factorize says:

    Why now? What societal change has provoked this dramatic change in personal interaction? I have yet to see the answer to this online; oh well I will just have explain it — I don’t think anyone will be able to figure this out. It is especially easy for me to understand this because of my personal constitution. I have went through life constantly saying the wrong things, annoying all the wrong people — social interaction for me has always meant constant conflict.

    After carefully studying my genome, there is no great mystery as to why this would be. There are numerous highly unusual genetic features in my exome that would suggest substantial problems in interacting effectively with others (possibly autistic spectrum issues and many others). When online education became available I jumped in right away and have thrived ever since. The transformation that I underwent was truly profound. Filling in forms, waiting in lines.. I couldn’t handle any of that. With an online environment you don’t have to. It is so much more affordable and convenient to do everything online.

    In online educational environments there is virtually zero opportunity for social conflict — largely because there is no social contact. It is a miracle! I have been saved! Hallelujah! “L’enfer, c’est les autres” I thought there was No Exit; there was. I thought that it would be my life, my destiny– D’autres personnes me détruiraient. This had always been my life. Destroyed by others one bit at a time. Yet, the online world (including unz.com) has been such a blessing.

    Non-synchronous conversation makes all the difference. Those who want to pull strings and push emotional buttons no longer have such an easy time in cyberspace. For someone who is a first-hand expert (on the receiving end) of these tactics I can confirm that outside of physical space these rhetorical strategies lose their emotional power. Manipulative behavior has likely coevolved in human society for many thousands of years. Being able to manipulate the emotion and thought of others especially those without normal psychological defenses almost certainly must be a universal feature in acquiring social and political control.

    The obvious problem is that those like me who were especially incompetent in social interaction have left the sand box. We have escaped society. Probably a fair number of the potential school shooters now finally have a realistic way out and they will be much much happier. Oddly the school system had always thought it was somehow plausible that upwards of 100% of the public school students in their district were psychologically equipped to handle society.

    I know that that is completely false. For me about all I would have to do now to get a pass out of compulsory schooling is pull out my genome file and just wait for them to beg me to leave. There are variants that all you can do is shutter at what might happen to the human mind if this protein were disabled or changed in a way that could be almost unique to a particular family. Given the current development of genomic science it might be many years before some of the more unusual genetics variants can be decrypted. We just do not know. Hopefully this will help to motivate a constructive conversation about using genetic technology to select genotypes to fit environments; create environments so that we can all thrive. Everyone loses when this does not happen.

    Returning to the initial direction of this post, there is a fairly clear line of logic that brings us to our increasingly divided society. After those on the extreme low end of social incompetence have left the playing field, who is left to play the provocation game with? (Maniacal laughter) Schadenfreude! Normal people! YOU! YOU can all experience my torrents. Without incompetents, it is necessary to create incompetents from those still in the game. But it now needs to be much much more subtle. Any potential indirect reference to nation or creed becomes offensive. This is exactly because much of the public space has been vacated by those who are socially incompetent or just want to get things done. Who is left? Exactly! Virtualization has created a nearly perfectly divided society into mutually opposing psychological types. There is a complete lack of balance now in the bricks and mortar world. The virtualists have left the building. The equilibrium has been driven to bipolar extremes. The entire system is now driving everyone to a bipole– the middle has collapsed.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Becker update V1.3.2
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.