The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
Blake Masters on the Root of America’s Gun Violence Problem: "Black People, Frankly"
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Peter Thiel’s losing streak is up. I don’t agree with everything the man endorses, and I don’t think he agrees with everything he endorses, but JD Vance and Blake Masters are going to change the entire game.

Masters is better than Vance, frankly. Masters is woke on Uncle Ted, he’s married to a white women with sons despite some possibly questionable mannerisms, and now he’s dropping the red pills we all wanted to hear: the truth about the root of “America’s gun violence problem.”

NBC News:

Blake Masters, a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in Arizona who was recently endorsed by former President Donald Trump, said on a podcast this year that “Black people, frankly” are to blame for America’s gun violence problem.

“We do have a gun violence problem in this country, and it’s gang violence,” Masters said on “The Jeff Oravits Show” in April. “It’s gangs. It’s people in Chicago, St. Louis shooting each other. Very often, you know, Black people, frankly. And the Democrats don’t want to do anything about that.”

Masters also claimed Democrats “are weak on crime” and “don’t like the Second Amendment” because “it frankly blocks a lot of their plans for us.”

There are three separate issues here:

  • Blacks are the ones doing the shooting
  • Democrats don’t want to talk about the blacks
  • The blacks fit into a plan that the Democrats have for America

The last one is really the most important.

But Masters – who I am now calling “Master Masters” – didn’t stop there.

During the same podcast, when asked what he thought about President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman confirmed to the court, Masters said she was “a horrible pick” and that she was an “affirmative action candidate.”

Masters did not immediately return a request for comment Tuesday.

Masters has promoted Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. He has also repeatedlyechoed the “great replacement theory” — a white supremacist conspiracy theory that there is a plot to diminish the influence of white people in the U.S. — by baselessly claiming that Democrats want to grant amnesty to thousands of immigrants in order to “make them voters.”

Imagine calling that a “baseless claim.” Democrats are constantly claiming that they want to give all of these illegal Mexicans voting rights. They’ve been trying to do this for decades.

Remember the “Gang of Eight”?

But note – please, I implore you to note – they did not claim that Master Masters’ statements about the blacks being at the root of the gun violence epidemic was a “baseless claim.” No one wants to touch that one. And the media didn’t even bring it up until now – months after the podcast was recorded.

No one in the media wants to have that argument, because someone is going to start waving around FBI crime statistics that show that blacks – who are 13% of the population – do 50% of violent crime, and in some cities, well over 80% of gun crime.

(These are 2016 numbers – it’s much worse now)
(These are 2016 numbers – it’s much worse now)

No one can argue that or call it a “baseless claim.” Without even looking at the statistics, everyone knows it. No one crosses the street when a group of white guys are walking towards them.

Democrats just simply do not want to talk about this issue at all, as their entire gun control narrative reverses – if blacks are doing virtually all of the violent crime, then white people need to keep their guns to protect themselves from these blacks, and Democrats – who are the ones who have made themselves the protectors of the blacks – need to figure out a way to get their little pets to stop killing everyone.

If blacks were doing 10% more gun crime than whites, you could haggle about it. But when they’re doing 1000% more gun crime than whites, well – someone has to explain this shit.

The burden to explain it falls on the people who are talking about it nonstop.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 262 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. A. Clifton says: • Website

    Truth is hate to those who hate the truth.

    John 8:44.

    There are no {{{PROSELYTES}}} to Talmudic Judaism in the Old Testament.

    Isaiah 13:14.

    • Agree: CSFurious
    • Thanks: omegabooks
  2. Watch this and note the color of the people doing the crimes and the idiots pretending they have solutions.

    • Replies: @CelestiaQuesta
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
  3. Alrenous says: • Website

    Reminder that the Bantu crime problem is approximately 20% biology and 80% the DNC.

    Before NAACP the Bantu bastardy rate was like 10%, after NAACP 20%, and after so-called civil rights, 80%. This is easy to measure, but correlates strongly with all forms of dysfunction.

    What you really want is a dysfunction constant. Crime has threshold effects. If you’re less dysfunctional than some value you don’t become a criminal, and if you are more dysfunctional, you do. It hasn’t even occurred to anyone to measure this, and if it did it would be super hard. You can proxy it sufficiently with bastardy, though.

    Likewise when the UN was kicked out of Somalia, conditions there improved dramatically. (Reminder: the UN headquarters are in New York.) Did things like going from ranked 45th in Africa to 3rd on some measures. Though Somalia is only 5% Bantu, which helps. Turns out the UN, like USG as a whole, really is Satanic, and Satanism is bad for you. (The world, she is a mysterious place.)

    Bantu make good slaves because they’re naturally obedient. The DNC tells them to be violent and dysfunctional, and sometimes to riot for them like a paramilitary, and they just do. Back in the 1800s folk were telling them to grow up and responsibly hold a family together instead, so they did. Of course there were never as good at this as Europeans but biology can’t explain both a 10% bastardy rate and an 80% bastardy rate. By contrast if you assume it’s deliberate sabotage the timing works out perfectly.

    The DNC would love if deprecated-Americans had the 80% bastardy rate and Bantu-Americans had the 50% rate, but deprecated-Americans aren’t quite that cucked. It’s not really for a reason; the DNC just wants to gloat about it and to cause as much suffering and agony among deprecated-Americans as possible, in that order.

    Meanwhile, bastards vote left. The more criminal, the more reliable the vote. Might as well lay absolute waste to the Bantu family while they wait for someone to finally convince European women to never stay married.
    I dunno why they care about more votes, since they’re just going to defraud the vote anyway if they don’t like it, but nevertheless if you follow the money it always comes down to making more left-voters and punishing right-voters for voting wrong. E.g. [defund the police] was allowed because cops vote right. NYPD consistently donates to the RNC, not the DNC.

    Perhaps it’s this: America is a theocracy and voting against the left is heresy. All Americans agree.

    Sadly if they really did defund the police, in the long term the crime rate would go down. Can’t have that.

  4. Emslander says:

    If he wins the election, the conversation will definitely change. SF DA getting beat in the recall is a pretty good shift already.

    • Replies: @Rooster15
  5. Notsofast says:

    it would be interesting to see at what point the rise in black gun violence began. my hunch would be right around the time crack cocaine was invented and distributed by the c.i.a.

  6. AceDeuce says:

    I would sometimes go on “liberal” news sites, back when they allowed comments (LOL) and would purposely “set the cat among the pigeons”, as the Brits say-basically, stir up trouble, by pointing out that blacks pretty much ruin everything they touch, offering concrete statistics and factual information about the net negative effect of blacks, especially the crime rate.

    The responses were telling. There would be outraged cries of “Well, who made them that way?” and ” If I were enslaved and lynched and segregated for hundreds of years, I’d be the same way” and “We’re lucky that’s all they’re doing, considering what we did to them”

    I’d then point out to those people that they evidently agreed with what I was saying. That none of them disagreed, or refuted my claims. The only difference was they were offering excuses for that behavior. That would set them off like a skyrocket.

  7. JD Vance and Blake Masters are going to change the entire game.

    Fool me every day of the week that ends in the letter ‘y’ then shame on… HEY LOOK! Yay! This is the politician I’ve been waiting for who will now turn things around! And just in time!!

    You’re like a kid getting emotionally invested in a WrestleMania character.

    The system is totally rigged and voting merely ratifies what the oligarchs have chosen for you.

    In 2022 if a political candidate (other than a billionaire celebrity) wins the nomination of a major party for a Congressional seat you can safely assume that TPTB have given their assent to their candidacy after receiving sufficient evidence that this candidate will if in office defer to the cabal on issues of importance to them (i.e., the important issues).

  8. anon[158] • Disclaimer says:

    Not just blacks, Hispanics also. Just look at how violent most Central American countries are.

  9. Kim says:
    @Alrenous

    In 1965 the White illegitimacy rate was 3%. The black rate was over 24%.

    Nowadays, the White rate is around 30%. The black rate is around 70%.

    Is there any clear relationship between illegitimacy and crime by race? Well, since 1970, White incarceration rates have roughly tripled, from 46.3 per 100,000 to 133 per 100,000 – although that figure is heavily asterisked by the fact that it is very common for non-Whites to claim to be Whites.

    As for blacks, well in 1970 they already had a disgraceful record of crime and incarceration, being incarcerated at the incredible rate of 365 per 100,000. Today, the black incarceration rate is 465 per 100,000.

    In other words

    1. Blacks have always been criminals. You can’t blame welfare for that.

    2. If your illegimacy/crime relationship holds any water, it is Whites who have been damaged proportionally more than blacks.

    You can’t blame black dysfunction and criminality on welfare. They were criminals long before welfare ever came on the scene.

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/816699/local-jail-inmates-in-the-united-states-by-race/

    https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/black-incarceration-rate-united-states-nationwide-problem

    • Agree: AceDeuce, 3g4me
  10. Kim says:
    @AceDeuce

    You are doing good work there.

    • Thanks: AceDeuce
  11. Not you says:
    @El Piloto, Air America

    The ideas he’s espousing are being given a platform and a microphone right now though and that’s a good thing.

    • Agree: Ben the Layabout, Nancy
  12. Kim says:
    @Notsofast

    Another one looking for excuses for black violence and dysfunction. Here is a list of murder rates per 100,000 worldwide.

    Black countries take many of the top positions. Compare crowded and poor Indonesia (Java has 850 people per square mile) with a mere 0.4 murders per 100,000, with Jamaica (43.85) Lesotho (43.86), Nigeria (34.52), South Africa (36.4) and on and on.

    The CIA did not introduce crack to these people all around the globe. Welfare did not make them violent and impulsive with no long term planning. The simple fact is, blacks are violent and dysfunctional.

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/murder-rate-by-country

    • Agree: AceDeuce, Ace
    • Replies: @Notsofast
  13. Bill H. says:

    “… JD Vance and Blake Masters are going to change the entire game.”

    Even if Masters wins the election, and I will take pretty much any odds that being not approved by his party he will not, being 1 of 100 Senators he will change precisely nothing.

  14. he’s not from phoenix either, which is a good thing. he maybe has some real arizona in him now. but one wonders what a stanford duke grad is doing in the sonoran desert. making america great again…perhaps…

    • Replies: @mocissepvis
  15. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @AceDeuce

    The responses were telling. There would be outraged cries of “Well, who made them that way?” and ” If I were enslaved and lynched and segregated for hundreds of years, I’d be the same way” and “We’re lucky that’s all they’re doing, considering what we did to them”

    It’s telling that these White liberals, neocons and ((Jews)) (Zionists all, in the vein of Joe “I am a Zionist” Biden) confess that they were behind the slave trade.

    A lot of government policy towards Blacks is precipitated upon ((Jew)) bad conscience, only, as always, they project their guilty past onto Whites who had nothing to do whatsoever with their money-grubbing slave trade, so they can continue to portray themselves as perfect and “chosen.”

    ((Jews)) and ((Jew)) stooges are a psychological mess, fit for incarceration in mental asylums for the criminally insane. They’re incapable of participating as functioning members of American democracy because of their psychological defects and the massive baggage their criminal pasts bring into the current day politics. And they just keep digging themselves deeper and deeper — today, lying us into the “War on Islamofascism” for Israel, declaring war on White America and framing it for their crimes, lying us into backing the war on Russia… on and on and on…

    And the corrupt political class that backs up their narratives and their globalization agenda (a new version of slavery) is as psychologically unfit and now criminally guilty as they are.

    • Agree: Richard B
  16. Danindc says:

    Good stuff – you should stop calling him Master Masters though because it sounds sort of gay

  17. Ole_ed says:

    I’d vote for Masters, if I still voted.

    Vance…not so much.

  18. Dr. Rock says:

    This is a good start-

    Next, talk about the US FBI rape statistics-

    black on white (16,000 – 26,000 per year),

    versus,

    white on black (statistically 0 per year, and for that stat, Hispanics are considered white)

    If the general public knew this, like so many other indisputable facts, the entire discussion would change, which is EXACTLY why they hide it!

    The same reason why they refuse to report all of the crimes committed by illegal aliens.

  19. bwuce wee says:

    this ‘answer’ is waaay toooo simplistic!
    1. first off- how come george soros gets a pass here? he is the one who financed all these black mayors and communist DAs across the country! you think they don’t do exactly like he tells them? THEY DO EXACTLY WHAT HE TELLS THEM TO DO. ‘he who pays the piper calls the tune’. george soros is directly responsible for the ‘new wave’ of urban gun crime, looting, carjacking, robbing and raping. AND WHY IS IT NO ONE TRACED THE PURCHASES OF GUNS HANDED OUT AT ANTIFA RIOTS and to BLM protesters?
    2. next level of blame is the democRAT mayors, city councils and DAs. and NOT all of them are black. white, asian, hispanic dems are ALL TO BLAME, too. they facilitate the ‘no bail, catch-and-release’ police policy.
    3. not all blacks are crazed shooters, so blaming all blacks for the actions of the ghetto rats is a WAR CRIME! that is correct. it is called COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT and it is a war crime, and it is typical NAZI behavior. same as blaming all gun owners for gun crime- that, too is collective punishment. same as blaming all muslims for the actions of jihadis, collective punishment. israel is a very good example of the perpetual use of nazi-style collective punishment, and we are seeing democRATS calling for it every day. libs are the modern NAZIs!
    4. not all shooters are gang members. sure gang crime is a large portion, but they already have special gang task forces in most major PDs. gang task force doesn’t cover loner deranged shooters.
    5. the education system is broken, and each year it get’s more inept.
    all these black kids were allowed to terrorize regular students, and were given a pass on all transgressions on and off campus, and have their charges driopped, juvenile records sealed, so let’s put some blame where it belongs: the teachers and school administraters who are basically nurturing the young criminals into a life of crime from which there is NO RETURN.
    6. illegal immigrants are ALSO responsible for lot of crime. we can blame democRATS for this, too. let’s not forget, oxycondin, fentanyl, MS-13, cartel human trafficking, cartel sex trafficking, cartel weapons trafficking…

    so to recap, we blame, george soros, democRATic regimes of all colors, the liberal education system, open border policies, as well as urban black rap culture which spawns black violence- not just in gang members.

    • Replies: @Swaytonious
    , @迪路
  20. When I first read the headline, I said to myself, “Black Masters” on gun control???

    Is he a new aspiring rapper dat I’m not familiar wit?

    Nigga Pleez, don’t scare me like dat.

    I’d like to know the stats on GlobalHomo, how many they murder, rape, assault, bla bla bla. Now there’s a violent segment of society that are totally out of control.

    Since they’re so many genders that may be difficult.

  21. The language taboos are destroying our ability to exercise public reason. Seriously. Basic liberalism is itself too racist and antisemitic to be allowed under Zog. Even basic liberalism, the ability to exercise reason publicly and sort out political problems in open debate is banned by the Jewish extremists that have taken over our country.

    • Agree: Harold Smith
    • Replies: @Not you
  22. Notsofast says:
    @Kim

    you missed my point all together, i’m not making excuses, i’m pointing out that our deep state wants blacks to be as violent as possible and encourages that by setting the conditions in place that ensure that outcome. soros funded d.a.’s revoloving door policy exasperates the situation by not holding criminals and decriminalizing theft under \$1000. they want the general population terrified of blacks and even more terrified of saying anything about it, as we are told the greatest danger is white supremacist terrorists.

    • Replies: @Swaytonious
  23. @RoatanBill

    Thing are changing fast, just yesterday I saw a black gardening crew at the local gas station mowing grass and trimming bushes. At first I thought they were dark Mexicans and them it dawned on me, them be black. Watching gas prices climb faster than a speeding poleez car on a donut run, I decided to fill up my truck with a half empty gas tank, I watched as the price rolled passed \$100.00. \$5.99 a gallon for regular, then it dawned on me, government doesn’t give rats ass about the price of gas, all it means is more tax revenue for them and higher prices for us.

    What would be the tipping point should gas and food become so expensive, people start hanging elected officials and their underbelly bureaucrats at overpasses and lampposts.

    I’m buying a thousand feet of rope rated for five thousand pounds, just in case you need to double or triple the hangings in order to conserve resources.

    Imma do my share for climate change, how bout you?

    • Replies: @Ben the Layabout
  24. Not you says:
    @Dr. Rosenpenis MD

    ” Even basic liberalism, the ability to exercise reason publicly and sort out political problems in open debate is banned by the Jewish extremists that have taken over our country.”

    Agreed. And it’s long past due that the question is publicly posed, loudly and constantly, as to why the Israeli’s get a continued pass on their genocide of the Palestinians. These people should have been cut-off from civilized society and given a bounce. And I’m being polite about it here.

  25. I love how they link to a Youtube video of Blake Masters talking about how the 2020 election was stolen to support their assertion that Trump’s claim the election was rigged is “false.” They don’t link to some comprehensive, non-partisan investigation commissioned by NBC news or the FBI (LOL) or the Department of Justice. “False” is just joined to “claims” like a Siamese twin because they say so.

  26. @El Piloto, Air America

    Masters and Vance are establishment tools. See Barack Obama’s hope and change and Oprah Winfrey all teary eyed on election night 2008.

    F’n Peter Thiel is a spook. He probably has a spreadsheet with a row for every Masters and Vance ejaculation and a column for what was in their mind at the instant of ejaculation. P~.6. The mind’s eye estimation algorithm still has a few bugs.

    • Replies: @Thim
  27. @Kim

    Good points.
    I am not an American, but have relatives and friends who are. Over the years, there has been a shift in most narratives, that manifest themselves in many different ways. For example, the “unjust” British imposed taxes that allegedly sparked the revolution have morphed from paying an “unjust tax” to paying no taxes, which has drifted into the Confederacy’s cause rebelling against what they saw as an “unjust tax” disappearing and replaced with slavery.
    In looking at the US, Henry Ford’s analysis of the veracity of the origins of the Protocols is accurate – it is irrelevant, because it fits what is happening today – one of which is the “promotion of the Negro”. Ironic that “I don’t see much future for the Americans … it’s a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social inequalities … my feelings against Americanism are feelings of hatred and deep repugnance … everything about the behaviour of American society reveals that it’s half Judaised, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together?” is attributed to Hitler.

    • Agree: JR Foley
  28. Richard B says:
    @Alrenous

    Reminder that the Bantu crime problem is approximately 20% biology and 80% the DNC.

    Yep!

    That’s why The DNC = Demonic Narcissistic Criminals,
    while The RNC = Really Never Cared (leadership) and Repressed Neo Cucks (base).

    For the DNC the USA = United Sadists of America.
    For the RNC the USA = United Scapegoats of America.

    The USA isn’t a country anymore. It’s a geographical location. A name on a map.

  29. @Notsofast

    Actually, IT’S TWO SOAPS IN ONE!! IT’S A CLEANSER AND SKIN MOISTURIZER!

    You are both right, of course. Nature and Nurture play a part. Bad breeding habits enlarge the bad genetic distribution, i.e., low quality and high quantity. Nurture is indisputable. High bad thresholds and low good thresholds spectra.

    They want to live, work, and exist away and separately from Whites, as do many Brown Indigenous. What is keeping us from partitioning the JUSA into three republics??

    • Replies: @Anymike
    , @Goddard
  30. Anon[131] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kim

    Thank you.

    The Boomercons’ views are always dead wrong. “It’s Democrats that cause crime, not our precious Corn Pops!” is only one of their many lies, which they will never tire of telling. But remember and take heart, everyone: the Day of the Pillow cometh.

    • Troll: Notsofast
  31. Just let me ask one question: How many mass-shootings were there in the USA 70 years ago – 1952?

    What was America doing right in 1952 that they are screwing up so bad in 2022?

  32. We should have picked our own fucking cotton.

    • Agree: mocissepvis
  33. @anon

    Just look at how violent most Central American countries are.

    But how can that be?

    They all have strict gun control laws!

    • Replies: @René Fries
  34. Unfortunately, despite an empty throw-away line denouncing the military industrial complex, Masters’ website (https://www.blakemasters.com/) does not specify a single war that he would end or a single country or region from which he would withdraw U.S. forces. Instead, he speaks like a neocon of “winning wars” and how be would “Support military action … in defense of … our allies like Israel,” “Get tough on China,” and “have dominant military capability” over the entire world, presumably.

    Also, he’s pro-immigration.

    Aside from that, I guess he’s our guy!

  35. Getaclue says:
    @AceDeuce

    That’s the reason they got rid of comment sections – people actually went there over the lame Leftist “articles” by the phony jOuRnAlisTs — even good sites finally had to get rid of them as they were being used to ban them based on “violence” of comments not liked by the Leftists

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @G. Poulin
  36. northeast says:

    If you are guided by the philosophy of voting for the lesser of two evils then voting for Vance & Masters is sensible. It’s certainly not going to radically change things in this country.

  37. This article is pure bullshit. Definitely not up to the standards of a typical Unz posting. Any simple minded moron would know that most mass shootings are committed by white males between the ages of 18 and 21, or a bit higher. In other words by social losers who should never have access to a firearm.

    The black on black teenage shooting crimes are a totally different issue, no doubt aggravated by the easy availability of firearms across state lines. If there ever were an argument for an interstate commerce regulation on gun sales, this is it.

  38. Getaclue says:
    @Ratiocinator

    LOL – Clown on – you desperately want to pin this garbage on “Whites” but like all your ilk you need to obfuscate and lie to do it — get lost loser:

    https://www.crisismagazine.com/2021/most-mass-shooters-are-not-white

    https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2019/08/51-mass-shooters-2019-were-black-only-29-were-daniel-greenfield/

    This is the truth as to why the Commie Left pimps “gun control” but doesn’t want gang bangers disarmed/incarcderated (Chicago great example-recently a gang murderer was not even prosecuted for a shoot out….) nor stats on Blacks being the overwhelming cause of gun violence discussed — they want their Political Enemies disarmed and subject to Mobs as we saw in “The Summer of Floyd” and they know ARs stand in the way of that Political Agenda:

  39. @Ratiocinator

    Whateva you say, nigga!

    • Replies: @HammerJack
  40. @Chris Moore

    ‘A lot of government policy towards Blacks is precipitated upon ((Jew)) bad conscience, only, as always, they project their guilty past onto Whites who had nothing to do whatsoever with their money-grubbing slave trade, so they can continue to portray themselves as perfect and “chosen.”’

    Given that the slaves were already slaves in Africa — and often headed for a fate considerably worse than that awaiting them in the Americas — why should anyone have a guilty conscience about transporting them from there to here?

    Consistently, blacks have proven reluctant to return to Africa. What is there to feel guilty about? Merchants should have bought them and set them free?

  41. @Dr. Rock

    I’ve never seen the actual statistic, but I would wager that at least in case where the rapist is a stranger, white women are more likely to be raped by a black man than a white man. And also consider that if there are 16,000-26,000 black-on-white rapes per year, there are also considerably higher numbers of black-on-black rapes. Black men are just exceedingly rapey.

  42. @Getaclue

    That’s the reason they got rid of comment sections – people actually went there over the lame Leftist “articles” by the phony jOuRnAlisTs — even good sites finally had to get rid of them as they were being used to ban them based on “violence” of comments not liked by the Leftists

    What would happen is that a liberal journalist would spend all week on an article only to have it picked apart in minutes.

    Liberals figured out pretty quickly that comments don’t benefit them. Their claims about being “reality based” fell apart rather quickly.

    The remaining MSM websites that allow comments heavily censor them. Anything that even remotely undermines the credibility of liberalism is removed within 48 hours. NYTimes must have a full time team of comment scrubbers. They pretend to allow debate and then go back and censor comments.

  43. Sasu says:
    @El Piloto, Air America

    Vance has only contempt for his class and kind, and it’s too bad that some of those hillbillies voted for him in the primary on the strength of Trump’s endorsement.

    • Replies: @Seanlove88
  44. @Kim

    We really don’t have good data on Black crime prior to integration.

    Conservatives are convinced that Blacks were just as moral as Whites before 1965.

    Books describing Black areas suggest that this is wishful thinking.

    What happened is that White police looked the other way on what happened in Black areas and both sides were fine with the arrangement.

    I had to read Richard Wright in my left-wing classes and he depicts life in Black areas in the 1930s. It had the opposite effect of what the professor intended. I thought…..this is supposed to make me pity Blacks????? Good God what are they not telling us if this is the left-wing approved book? The protagonist of Native Son is a straight up murderer and you are actually supposed to pity him for being born into a White world. I couldn’t believe that such a disgusting book would be celebrated by leftists.

    • Replies: @Seanlove88
  45. @Sorel McRae

    He’s playing 4d chess clearly.

    Still, it was nice to hear such a based take from a political critter.

    • Replies: @Sorel McRae
  46. Bill O’reilly said the same a few years back. “We don’t have a gun problem – we have a black male problem.”

  47. Laughing

    Crime and blacks politics is an old dog and pony show. If the gentleman really want to make hay and do some serious damage t liberal aspirations,

    He’d beg off the old hat tricks of black criminals in large financially damaged cities and run for Governor of Arizona. As the senator from Arizona, he’s not going to accomplish much about the plight of major metropolitan communities. A nice dog whistle for elections . . and then . . .

    the front lines are the states of CA, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Texas . . . Oregon.

  48. This shows how ineffective gun laws are. Federal and state laws ban felons from having guns . But all these black felons still get guns and kill people.

  49. @bwuce wee

    Excuses excuses..

    Collective punishment is fair to be inflicted on blacks because they are currently inflicting collective punishment on whites. I may not agree with the concept but I think the best justice is hoisting one upon their own petard.. that said, I will expend exactly as much effort restraining my more… animated coethnics as “good blacks” spend restraining baser cousins.. which is to say, none at all.

    • Replies: @bwuce wee
  50. @Jimmy le Blanc

    Ya have a point there, Jimmy!
    My, how different things would have been.
    It’s an interesting idea to ponder.

  51. Ghali says:

    What a racist trash? The recent violent mass shootings had nothing to do with gangs or Black people. Black people were/are the victims. Black Master is a White stooge under black mask.

    • LOL: Emslander
  52. @Chris Moore

    lying us into the “War on Islamofascism” for Israel

    hmmm… is it a lie to quote qur’ân passages making jihâd an OBLIGATION for each and every Muslim? BTW, islam = fascism, so “islamofascism” is useless

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @Druid55
  53. @Notsofast

    Cannon Hinnert and Cash Gernon and so many others require a reckoning.

  54. @Notsofast

    it would be interesting to see at what point the rise in black gun violence began.

    Began in the early 60s, was turbocharged by the late 60s, and off the scale during the 70s. Nothing to do with crack cocaine, though that did sort of coincide with the peak around 92.

  55. SafeNow says:

    The blacks fit into a plan that the Democrats have for America
    ….really the most important.

    The plan is to abolish the suburbs as a safe, decent, pleasant place. Urban murders and other crimes and affronts are a bit player (if anyone still use that expression). They want to ruin your suburbs, and, they will.

  56. @Ratiocinator

    ..most mass shootings are committed by white males between the ages of 18 and 21, or a bit higher. In other words by social losers

    They are a primo category for recruitment by Deep State types to drug, get psychologically-screwed by shrinks, weapons-trained and unleashed to execute false flag attacks. That is quite a bit different than what you believe is the case.

    (Btw, where exactly did 18 yrd old Salvador Ramos get the approx \$12,000 for all the equipment he supposedly had? Fishy, right? Oh and, no doubt, that school in Uvalde had interior cameras trained to show who is coming in the doors. So, WHERE is the video of Ramos coming in with weapons? Walking down the hall? LOL, does he even exist? Or is he a Hollywood production? Let’s see the school video of him on that day or I say he doesn’t exist.)

    Some have theorized that there is a feeder type system of school counselors and/or shrinks identifying the screwy and susceptible ones. Getting them on pharma drugs, into head shrinkage and hypnosis and it goes from there. MK Ultra type stuff. Not nearly a crazy idea.

    Give this article a good skim. Written in 2013, reposted this week.
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/06/mark-reynolds/list-of-45-different-murders-and-pharma-drugs-they-were-on/

  57. nsa says:
    @Dr. Rock

    “white on black rape….statistically 0”
    No surprise. Black chicks average like 300 lbs…..mean too and beat the crap out of most white guys.

    • LOL: mark green
  58. @Sir Launcelot Canning

    What was America doing right in 1952 that they are screwing up so bad in 2022?

    Will you accept everything as an answer?

    Korean War being one possible exception.

  59. @Jimmy le Blanc

    Homie! Homie! That gun done cross state lines! You know you can’t use that! Put that down now!

    • LOL: ThreeCranes
  60. @Bill Jones

    So also has Luxembourg. Just look at how non-violent West European countries are (…true, the increasing numbers of Muslims and Blacks mean that this will change over time or rather, is already changing)

    • Replies: @Druid55
  61. In Ukraine a few years ago a billionaire named Igor Kolomoisky bought himself a puppet – Volodymyr_Zelenskyy. The Z fellow promised to seek peace, and was supported by most Russian-speaking Ukranians. All this was to get into office so he could start working on the agenda of his real boss.

    In the US a billionaire named Peter Thiel has found himself a puppet by the name of Blake Masters. This M fellow will say anything at all to get into the Senate. What he has written in years past:

    The evolution of Blake Masters

    The Arizona GOP Senate candidate — who just earned Trump’s blessing — decries ‘open borders’ but once called for ‘unrestricted’ immigration while praising drug smugglers as ‘heroes’

    https://jewishinsider.com/2022/06/blake-masters-arizona-senate-livejournal/

    What will Arizona voters get if this wealthy puppet goes to DC? A racist Trump suckup as currently portrayed, or a fanatical Libertarian who will serve his wealthy puppeteer by maximizing the profits from the “immigration” issue.

    • Replies: @Sorel McRae
  62. What – wait till Black people get guns – then you’ll see what the govenment will do

    – or such is the logic of thsis talk-show of enraged women – : –

    • LOL: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @Anymike
  63. anonymous[294] • Disclaimer says:
    @A. Clifton

    When I say the truth that your accursed 3in1 “in-his-image” pagan polytheist mangods-worship is a godless abomination (how different is it from Dot-Dindoo mangods-worship?), do you view that as hate?

    Your kind’s entire spiritual existence is one big irony. You quote all these scriptures like mindless albino apes, blissfully unaware that your core spirituality is founded on Lies.

    GOD IS NOT MAN!!!

    Is this simple truth so difficult to comprehend?

  64. Anymike says:

    Speaking of people named Masters, Roy Masters, the British-born once host of a conservative and religious-oriented human potential themed talk radio show, said that when he first came to America in the late 1940s, the black people he met were gracious and personable. What happened, he wondered?

    Well, a lot things happened, and a lot of people were affected. A certain small but ferociously effective secretive political faction worked to promote the decline of traditional values. Under the influence of Hug Hefner and others, the definition of success in life changed. Once, success meant earning a high income and having prestige in your local community. By the end of the 1950s, success meant living out your own idiosyncratic fantasy and letting the world peep in on it now in then, in Hefner’s case peep literally in the pages of his magazine.

    Then there was a revolution in avant garde art, notably in popular music, which overtly sought to transform the values of each succeeding younger generation.

    Then in the 1990s, yet a new definition of success came along, exemplified by the decade’s transcendent popular figures, Michael Jordan and Bill Clinton. Once, success meant taking your talent and doing your best to a high level. Not anymore. Now, your best had to be better than anyone else’s best or you were a failure.

    Is it any wonder everyone is crazy? Or that blacks, a very emotional and socially-oriented people isolated in their own separatist culture, have a very high rate of youth and young adult violence and have experienced a proliferation of gangster culture? If you can’t be an athletic star or a pop star, another way to live out your own fantasy and be a little flamboyant about it is to become a gangster. Every man his own Al Capone.

  65. @Sir Launcelot Canning

    Just let me ask one question: How many mass-shootings were there in the USA 70 years ago – 1952?

    What was America doing right in 1952 that they are screwing up so bad in 2022?

    Is this a trick question? Everyone knows where we went off the rails the dates and activities are well known.

    1) Ended segregation which kept feral niggers on a VERY short leash, hence, chimping out was unheard of back then. They are all children mentally. Just as you would not expect a child to control himself given unlimited freedom, so to is it with the pavement ape.

    2) Destructions of the nuclear family and loss of all social capital. White teenagers and young men would have found the thought of shooting up the school inconceivable because what would Mom & Dad say? The rest of the neighbors he grew up with?

    Unleash negroid bioweapon, destroy social capital, destroy nuclear family, convince women they are ‘unhappy’ and should live & compete as men. The list goes on. All that I can say — Thanks Jews.

  66. @WizardWhoKnocks

    OK, but who’s getting played? If you have to ask, it’s probably you.

  67. 迪路 says:
    @bwuce wee

    However, George Soros is not a communist, but a pure evil who has incited riots in both communist and capitalist countries. You can read George Soros’s teacher Karl Popper’s book, The Open Society and Its Enemies. Karl Popper is a critic of Karl Marx.

  68. Anymike says:
    @Poupon Marx

    The practical reason why people don’t want to split the USA is because they want to keep the common market the USA represents, they want to keep their federal benefits and their federal subsidies, and they want the right to live anywhere and travel anywhere. Many people have lived in the more than one of the possible sections the U.S, would split up into and most people have relatives living in the more than one of them.

    In my lifetime, I have lived in three different section for long period of time and two more for short residencies. I have relatives living in three of the sections.

    Maybe the concerns people have don’t quite rise to the level of Lincoln’s “mystic chords of memory” from his first inaugural, but they mean something. People are going to recoil from breaking it up entirely. They don’t want to lose the benefits they get and most do not want to lose the guaranteed rights either. Many see the federal government as their protector in the face of potential local excesses as much as they see localism as a bulwark against federal excesses.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    , @mark green
  69. anonymous[294] • Disclaimer says:
    @AceDeuce

    The crimes of slavery were committed by whitevil mofers. The crimes of racism and economic oppression continues to this day. All this is undeniable. All criminals must be punished.

    I personally don’t understand negro behavior, but they are being the judge and jury to the whitevil criminal civilisation, in many cases retrospectively for the crimes of your soulless cracker bastard ancestors.

    Their thought process appears to be; for our plight we will take you albinoniggers down with us.

    It appears they are succeeding.

    Good!

  70. Anonymous[129] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Moore

    ((Jews)) and ((Jew)) stooges are a psychological mess, fit for incarceration in mental asylums for the criminally insane. They’re incapable of participating as functioning members of American democracy because of their psychological defects and the massive baggage their criminal pasts bring into the current day politics.

    While perhaps intended as hyperbole, I think the description is close to the simple truth. I’ve dealt extensively with Jews, and they have always at some point turned out to be hostile and treacherous, at which point I cut end contact.

    Up until now, I’ve tried to conform to the societal/propaganda theme that Jews as individuals can be at least harmless and possibly friends. Experience has not borne that out, and I have to reconsider my stance.

    In fact, I’d say that having the government we do, one that is structurally democratic but utterly unresponsive to popular interests (which it calls “populism” in a denigrating way), causes a mild mental illness in us all, “mental illness” in that our mental model of “what is” quite different from “what is”. The Jews have a severe case of it, coupled with a gnosticism that enables them to think of those around them as non-player characters that have gone wrong.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  71. @Zachary Smith

    … and a neocon shill who will help get us in more wars for Israel and try to provoke one with China (without ending a single one in which we are now engaged). That’s his platform. Check it out.

  72. Kat Grey says:

    The large black population is the main reason why Americans are armed to the teeth and won’t relinquish their guns. Had Reginald Denny been carrying he wouldn’t have been pulled out of his truck and beaten to within an inch of his life in the 1992 LA riots. Here in Europe the indigenous people are increasingly at the mercy of feral African migrants who carry out violent attacks on public transport and in the streets.

  73. @Richard B

    What about the American habit of going around the world to kill and torture people, does that also have to do with 20% biology and 80% the DNC?

    Is America a terrorist “nation” ?

    Drive-by shooting gone international !!!

    • Replies: @Kim
    , @bispora
    , @Mefobills
    , @Alrenous
  74. Anymike says:
    @Dieter Kief

    Black people do have guns. Many of the gun laws in the United States were passed with the intent of controlling black crime more than anything else. Consider the 1968 federal firearms act. That was a law intended more to anything to prevent gun possession by black criminals. They make the white ex-offenders into the poster boys but it was black crime that was the issue. Some of New York’s very strict gun laws also were aimed at organized crime and the street level soldiers of the mafia and other gangs.

    Blacks who are legal gun owners are treated just like anyone else. They are ignored and left alone unless some incident requiring a law enforcement response occurs.

    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
  75. No matter how many turns the issue is given, weapons like drugs are a problem created by white racist hatred as a way to destroy the rest of the population that is not. It is part of eliminating the competition for life.

    • Troll: Jimmy le Blanc
  76. bispora says:

    Yesterday in Hungary, the alarming number of US gun homicides was discussed on a TV talk. It was brought up that beer can only be bought over 21 and guns over 18 in the US, so it might be worth reversing the two rules. Then someone mentioned Finland and Switzerland where there are a lot of individuals with firearms but the murder rate is extremely low. The discussants agreed that this was very strange and that the explanation of the extreme murder rate in USA might be different cultures. There was no mention of blacks. The key here is the stunning lies of the American media and the European media underneath it. The globalist-liberal media do not report facts, but opinions. For some reason the journalists and reporters of the NYT, CNN, Guardian, BBC etc. do not see the black hand holding the gun…

  77. padre says:
    @anon

    Yeah right, white people never did anybody no harm in the history!

    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
  78. @anonymous

    And who are they punishing when they slaughter each other in sub-Saharan Africa as just recently in an attack on a church in Nigeria? They kill more of each other in US too than they kill whites. Maybe a few think like you do, or try to justify their crimes with such reasoning, usually after the act, but I doubt it plays any role in their thought processes when they set out to commit mindless crimes. When they draw their guns and start shooting it’s usually other blacks that get hit. There’s no hope in hell of them organising any meaningful insurgency against the white system they complain about.

  79. Kim says:
    @Charles Martel France

    The chaos that jews foment around the world is 100% DNA, and the DNC is just a vehicle for that DNA.

  80. @Anymike

    Black people do have guns. Many of the gun laws in the United States were passed with the intent of controlling black crime more than anything else.

    Go tell this those fabulous talking heads I’ve linked above!

    My point is rather this one: What does it tell about the public debate in the US, that these women – obviously – think they can get away with such a blatant negation of what’s actually up in the US, gun-wise.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  81. I’m only here for the next stormer web address

    • Replies: @Thim
  82. @anonymous

    I personally don’t understand negro behavior, but they are being the judge and jury to the whitevil criminal civilisation, in many cases retrospectively for the crimes of your soulless cracker bastard ancestors.

    You’re right. You don’t understand negro behavior.

    Aside from a few Ivy League-nursed black quasi-scholars, their minds are anywhere but on trials and punishment for historic wrongs. Their obsessive motivation is gimme.

  83. bispora says:
    @Charles Martel France

    Ever since the Russians put their Avantgarde hypersonic missile into service, US aircraft carriers all belong to Titanic-class …

    • LOL: Thim
    • Replies: @Avery
    , @Alrenous
  84. anon[424] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Moore

    Yet, why should they change? They run the country, and whites are gutless. We are now seeing the American mentality at work: let someone else assume the danger, bitch about your masters and injustice, but insist that others place themselves in the way of harm. The ((jews)) figured out Americans were gutless a long time ago, so your imprecations and threats fall on death ears. Watching an American treat POC in different lands like garbage, then return home and grovel at the feet of his ((jew)) masters, is one of the ugliest things in nature. Overweight cowards with a condescending attitude. Is it any wonder they are hated around the globe?

  85. Masers is definitely right about the blacks and shooting overall.
    ————————————————————————-
    But these mass shootings done by young White guys is the result of these SSRI (Ritilin, Paxil, Prozac, Xanax, etc.) medications they’re all found to be on but is never reported.

  86. anarchyst says:
    @Anonymous

    Your statement: “((Jews)) and ((Jew)) stooges are a psychological mess, fit for incarceration in mental asylums for the criminally insane. They’re incapable of participating as functioning members of American democracy because of their psychological defects and the massive baggage their criminal pasts bring into the current day politics.”…is spot on.
    It starts with the cruel procedure of male genital mutilation (circumcision). Removing a healthy body part despite no medical necessity is one thing, but the dirty “mohel” fellating the infant is an excellent way to introduce STDs to the infant. As STDs do not manifest themselves until well into adulthood, this is a major reason why many jews are so f#cked up. It’s the mental illness caused by the STDs that is the problem.

  87. G. Poulin says:
    @Getaclue

    I used to visit Catholic websites, and I noticed the same trend. Almost all of them got rid of their comment sections. The reason given is that the comments had become “toxic” (toxic being defined as anything the people running the site didn’t want to hear). Their guiding principle is “keep the bubble intact at all costs!” Lot of that going around.

  88. anarchyst says:

    Take away the black crime statistics from the equation and the USA ranks near the bottom of violent crime statistics.
    It’s black criminality, not firearms.

  89. Goddard says:
    @Poupon Marx

    What is keeping us from partitioning the JUSA into three republics?

    Even a partitioning would require from whites more intra-racial cohesion than exists now. What whites need is not to flee like rabbits from the advancing brown hordes, but to cohere. Instead of separation, racially conscious whites should be planning for conquest of the entire nation and expulsion of the parasites.

    If whites cohere again and emerge from their doldrums, then the question becomes what to do with the parasites leeching off us. In a separatist scenario, the black and Hispanic bantustans soon fail, the failure being especially evident in comparison to the strong nation that the whites in their nation will build. The white rump state would then effect a reconquista of the weak black and Hispanic republics. After the reconquest, expulsion would then be the wise course. Otherwise, you live with the newly reconquered black and brown serfs, but under a system of apartheid. We would be right back where we were when we started with desegregation back in the Fifties and Sixties. All that would be needed is another plunge into sentimentality, and the cycle we have been living through these past six decades would begin anew.

    No, I say, perform the expulsion now. Make the separation not on the territory of the former United States, but on a continental scale. Banish the parasites not to Aztlán but to Mexico, banish them not to a bantustan carved out of the Southeast but to Wakanda (Africa). Banish the losers to wherever the hell we want—enforce the expulsion at the point of a gun, and let the parasites be thankful that we require only their banishment, not their lives.

    American whites have lost their cohesion and their restraint and are in disarray. Democratic-republicanism is dying. The American Caesar is on his way. Whites’ task is to cohere again and make sure that the coming Caesar is a right-wing Caesar.

    • Agree: Kim
    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  90. The photo of Schumer smirking over Pelosi is a perfect image of America in that the latter is a bitch of the former and willing to be ‘guided’ by him, so long as the bank account continues to grow and with harlots like her in the position of power Historic American Nation will continue to suffer degradation.

    • Replies: @anon
  91. bwuce wee says:
    @Swaytonious

    nope. 2 wrongs don’t make a right. you are basically MAKING AN EXCUSE by saying it is OK to kill and eat blacks if they blacks killed and ate white people first. and by your faulty logic you should offer yourself as a slave to blacks because some white ancestors owned slaves. sound about right mr ‘eye-for-an-eye’? how does your own petard feel, retard?

  92. AceDeuce says:
    @anonymous

    I see by your spelling of “civilization” that you’re not an American. Meaning that you don’t know shit from shoe polish about any of this. Spineless cuck. Of course, you could be some mystery meat non-White who has infected some European country. In any event, you’re an idiot. But I think you’re going to see some interesting things in the future. Try to find someone intelligent who can explain it to you.

  93. It’s absolutely true that blacks account for the majority of gun crime in America.

    But when is Andrew Anglin going to take responsibility for making a hero out of Brendon Tarrant?

    Grifters never accept accountability.

    And Weev is Jewish. No matter how you try to spin it:. “Oh no bro, he was playing Jewish for publicity purposes. Gawd,can’t you wignats understand?”

  94. Anon[272] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    But Roatan, you live in Belize where there are a lot of Blacks. Google tells me the murder rate there is 38/ 100,000. In Chicago the rate is 18.2/ 100,000. In Rio de Janeiro the rate is around 20.6/ 100,000

    A friend told me that the jails in Belize are a living hell. Yet it looks like the Homies could care less about sharing a blazing hot cell with 15 other criminals, bathing once in a while, shitting in a bucket and having to have a friend or family member bring food and other necessities to the jail house.

    I find it intriguing that you are living in a place with a higher incidence of terminal violence while pointing out the black crime problem in the US. Could you justify your stance on this ?

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  95. Nat X says:

    And come the day of the rope we will be committing 100% of the violence, quite frankly…

  96. Anon[272] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    Watch this and note the color of the people doing the crimes and the idiots pretending they have solutions.

    A very interesting video, shocking at times and amusing at others. Well RB, if you had absolute power what would you do ?

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  97. Mefobills says:
    @Kim

    In other words

    1. Blacks have always been criminals. You can’t blame welfare for that.

    Blacks do ok where there is an omnipresent “man” ready to kick their ass if they get out of line.

    So, absent sending blacks back to Africa, then segregation is the best solution. Then the schools have to be segregated by sex, and then older black men are trained by older white men.

    The older black men then put the hammer down on young black males, whenever the buck steps out of line.

    Plenty of studies are already done showing that blacks are more impulsive, and have high “now” time preference. They also have to learn with movement, they cannot sit in class like a little girl – they have to be jumping around so that motor neurons are also involved in the learning association process.

    Making them run laps outside when they get froggy is another way to discipline.

    White people in the old American south figured out how to deal with blacks. It is Northern White Liberals and their fellow Jewish travelers that are the real problem, as their heads are not screwed on straight.

    With regards to Negro expulsion, that is easy to do with a “bill system.” A bill system is a type of economy where treasury issues bills of credit, and also some debt free money to pay interest on the bills.

    NSDAP not so secretly used a bill system to avoid a great depression, and it seems practically no historian acknowledges this.

    The Bill of Credit looks like a check, and has three parties involved. Basically, the negro gets a check to move to Africa. The “bill” is redeemed in a bank in Africa, and through ledger mechanics it is easy enough to pay in dollars, which then demand American goods. This then employs American Whites (and browns) to unscrew the future. The future is improved by removing problems.

    Of course, the finance oligarchy that runs America has always opposed negro removal, because that is just a hop and skip away from Jew removal.

    Robert Morris (((crypto?))) prevented Bills of Credit from being included in article 1 section 8, even though the Colonials operated with this type of money and economy. HE wanted to be the creditor for the new country, not Treasury through a state bank.

    Its not possible to understand the world without following the Jew and their manipulations, including the Negro problem.

    • Replies: @Sir Launcelot Canning
  98. Trinity says:

    Crime stats be wayciss, yo.

  99. @Colin Wright

    Shouldnt free them?

    When the jews enslave “whites”jews are white to me), please have that same energy.

    It’s only right….lmao

  100. anon[109] • Disclaimer says:
    @American Bulwark

    and you can thank past generations of WASP cucks for selling out. WASPS had their panties in a bunch about Catholic ethnics while enabling the niggers and kikes to become as powerful as they are today

    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
  101. @Sasu

    The groups on here are dumb. Do you expect them to know this?

  102. @John Johnson

    Funny how you all (whites), believe DATA only when it doesn’t go against your beliefs.

    Strange concept.

  103. Anonymous[372] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    The crimes of racism and economic oppression continues to this day. All this is undeniable. All criminals must be punished.

    Right you are. End the crimes of racism and economic oppression! Abolish the 1965 Civil Rights Act, and punish those who try to defend it by driving them out of politics!

  104. Avery says:
    @bispora

    US/NATO aircraft carriers are not meant to intimidate, much less militarily threaten large land powers like Russia and China. They are meant to terrorize little defenseless countries around the globe, like say Libya*. Or in the case of China to “show the flag” around Taiwan.: a ridiculous, childish display of one’s alleged military prowess.

    btw: Chinas has developed ballistic missiles specifically for sinking US carriers**.

    The second reason is to bloat the defense budget even more: 10s of US\$ billions more for MIC.
    Our civilian infrastructure is crumbling all around us and these morons are gloating about supercarrier this,, supercarrier that.

    The era of carrier battle ship groups battling it out in the middle of the ocean ended at the Battle of Midway (between US Navy and Japanese Imperial Navy).

    ___________________________________________
    * The French carrier Charles de Gaulle participated in the NATO terrorist attack on Libya. Completely immune to any Libyan military response.

    **
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DF-26

    • Agree: bispora
    • Replies: @Avery
  105. I live in a county in Florida that is lower middle class and 95% white. Redneck if you will. Diehard Trump country. I am beginning to see more and more blacks in my county and every once in a while will see one walking down the street. No one bothers them or verbally abuses them. Now imagine a white person walking down the street in a neighborhood that is 95% black. He wouldn’t get two blocks before he is lying in a crumpled bloody heap in the middle of the street.

  106. Angharad says:
    @Colin Wright

    Negroes should be NOWHERE NEAR White Civilizations PERIOD.

    • Agree: Kim
  107. @Sorel McRae

    White Americans,who are 90 percent of Republican party voters, have to wake up and smell the shit on the 12 foot long ,homosexual dong that has been ramming them in their collective, taxpaying asses for decades. The GOP and the DNC are two retail outlets of the same malignant political organism that has been used by the Jewish controlled mass media to dismantle the United States and transform the Republic into a totalitarian, Marxist third world slum. Graham, Rubio, Romney, et. al. are accomplices to the destruction, dispossession and impoverishment of white working people in the United States. Even when the kosher conservative GOP is the voting majority in Congress and a nominal conservative is in the White House, somehow the United States southern border remains as wide open as Mexican whore in Tijuana with millions of non-whites pouring in every year, somehow 3.8 billion USD in taxpayer money makes its way to Israel every year, while millions of Americans are unemployed, homeless, literally starving and drowning in consumer debt, struggling to put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads in an increasingly inflationary economic environment. Somehow, the mass media are allowed to maintain an illegal de facto monopoly ( technically, an incestuous oligopoly, with 6 corporations controlling 90 percent of the media industry) , giving an inordinate degree of political power to a Jewish dominated economic elite of billionaire cultural Marxists, pumping out the same degenerate antiwhite propaganda in the entertainment and news industry, and the CRT and homosexuality propaganda being pushed in the school system and colleges and universities. President Richard Nixon was caught on tape lamenting to Billy Graham in the 1970s that Jewish control of the American mass media was an existential threat to the security of the United States. And what did the Republican president do about? He launched Operation Nickelback during the 1973 Yom Kippur War, which dangerously drew down American/ NATO military stockpiles in Europe at the height of the Cold War in order to resupply the Israeli Army, which was getting annihilated by the Egyptian and Syrian forces . Had Nixon allowed the Arab military forces to prevail, our problem in the Middle East regarding the big fat ,swollen Zionist parasite would have been done, and a major center of Jewish power would have been destroyed. And that was in 1973, only 6 years after the arrogant Jews attacked the USS Liberty, killing 34 US servicemen and severely wounding 171 others during the Six Day War.
    The Republican Pary is not the savior for white Americans, it is the other pair of hands operating the guillotine. What is needed is a political party that unambiguously advances the collective, long term interests of white Americans as an ethnic group, just as every other ethnic group does. Contact the American Freedom Party.

    Amfreeparty.org

    • Replies: @abcdef
  108. Mefobills says:
    @Charles Martel France

    What about the American habit of going around the world to kill and torture people, does that also have to do with 20% biology and 80% the DNC?

    All humans have a new god, and it is prices and money.

    How often do you think about money and the price of things?

    Are you an Aryan looking up at the stars and pondering the universe like your fore-bearers? The Swastika is an ancient Aryan symbol, which symbolizes the universe rotating in movement as you look up.

    Time is circular, life is circular, and there is seasonal movement. Does any modern brain washed person think that time is circular anymore? They think that time is linear, and that debts must grow and be paid, and when they die, they are done.

    The American brain became parasitized soon after the English brain. Judeo Christianity, and then Atlantacism, and then “international FRN credit as money” and then the world priced in dollars.

    So no, it is not biology, it is brainwashing. Washington advised against “permanent alliances,” whereas Jefferson, in his inaugural address on 4 March 1801, declared his devotion to “peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.”

    America became imperialist and formed entangling alliances, when it became parasitized by Atlantacist insertion. This happened around the time of the Spanish American War.

    In the case of negroes, they are brainwashed in the same way as American whites, as they are immersed in the same culture. The difference in behavior does relate to biology.

    Think of it like a Venn diagram, there is some overlap for races, but also divergence. The races are not the same in those regions with no overlap.

    Immigration is a really bad idea due to racial differences.

  109. @padre

    No, we brought civilization to the dark hordes.

  110. @Anon

    I don’t live in Belize. I live in arguably a worse country, Honduras. Everything you describe about prisons in Belize also applies to Honduras.

    Roatan island is 40 miles off the coast of Honduras and was historically British. Many of the “white islander” families are named Hyde, McNabb, Jackson, etc. The island was gifted to Honduras but the white islanders own most of the land and any they’ve sold off has been bought largely by people mostly from the US and Canada of which there are thousands of expats on the island along with many Italians and other Europeans. Roatan may be part of Honduras, but it’s not part of Honduras if you catch my drift.

    White expats on the island eventually get to realize that they have “the force”, as it’s known. Just by showing up at a gated community, the guard will open the gate. When I want to enter the cruise ship dock, I don’t get questioned, the gate just opens. Many people move here and go back home after a year or two because they expect things will run like back home. Pink haired Democrats that “Back the Blue” and wouldn’t dream of protecting themselves won’t make it here.

    I don’t speak Spanish but have absolutely no problems dealing with the business community on the island because they are all English speakers. Even gov’t services are staffed by people that speak English. The black population on the island is bilingual but think in English. Some blacks have a hard time translating Spanish because their Spanish isn’t that good.

    I was shot and stabbed on 3 occasions by blacks in New York while in high school and is why by 16, I carried a pistol, law or no law. I haven’t been so much as accosted for money or anything else while on Roatan for 16 years. I have been victimized by things not nailed down going missing, but no violence. I believe “thief” is a valid job description here since whole families are known to be thieves. Once one understands this, one takes the necessary precautions.

    Prior to the covid fiasco, I ran several successful businesses and learned to only hire blacks as employees. I was invited to their weddings and funerals and attended them. There is no such thing as “welfare” here, so legitimate work or the drug trade are used for income. I know the drug dealers, my customers, and they’re just business people.

    The general attitude toward crime around here is self reliance since the cops here are just as useless as anywhere else. Let me give you one example. A white islander kept telling a local thief, well known to the cops, to stay off his boat dock. One day, an outboard motor went missing. Some time after that, the thief was discovered on the boat dock shot dead. The police arrived and the white islander told them he knew nothing about it. That was the end of the investigation.

    I have legally purchased weapons and carry when I feel the need. Through my employees and our long time association, they got to know my attitude on many things. They know that I’ll kill anyone that comes at me, law or no law. That information is known by a wider audience via “coconut telegraph” and signals that I’m a hardened target.

  111. Everything that is Jewish is artificial and against nature.
    You have to imagine this: How natural is it to give a wo-
    man a “pill” that prevents her pregnancy? How natural
    is it to put a piece of rubber between the reproductive
    organs of two lovers that prevents their genetic fusion?

  112. @anon

    That is far from clear. Yes, on the surface they appear more violent. El Salvador is (supposedly) the world’s most violent country by far, yet they have near-zero Negroid population. But wait — we should dig deeper. In the first place “Hispanic” is a poor racial description. There are too many mixes of races and ethnicity. It is dishonest to equate a pure European Iberian (“White”) ancestry Hispanic with a mixed or full blood indigenous one. Secondly, there are wildly differing legal systems in nations. While dueling is not legal most places, it may be so informally. If so , a death that would be murder in the USA might not get counted. This, and any number of other reasons, including simple inability to accurately record statistics, are all factors that should cast doubt on “statistics.” A third argument against Hispanic violence is in the USA. It may be higher than Anglo rates, but it’s much less than Black crime. Unz in prior articles has even argued that the Hispanic crime rate is actually non-existent. I take no position on the validity of this, but share it for those interested in further research.

    Summary: Take statistics with a grain, perhaps a shaker or even an entire mine, of salt.

  113. Anonymous[372] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dieter Kief

    What does it tell about the public debate in the US, that these women – obviously – think they can get away with such a blatant negation of what’s actually up in the US, gun-wise.

    Hi, Dieter! Here’s a serious attempt to answer your question. Please at least look at the footnote URLs, which give examples both temporal and mythological to your question. IMHO we’re looking at a real tragedy here, in the sense of “protagonists who are doomed by their own, possible their best, qualities”. Hamlet is reluctant to kill the king, for example, but reluctance to commit regicide is ordinarily considered a virtue — people get all upset after a regicide.

    So here’s the attempt at an answer:

    [MORE]

    Men have their hero stories about overcoming the physical or social world.

    The women’s equivalent is taming their man, and possibly making their own children civilized.

    One of the aspects of taming their men that European descended women find important is keeping their man and kids from being killed while trying to become real life heroes. That was the theme, for example, of many of the anti-war songs in the 1960s [1]. I have heard no song that intended to emphasize that women also have to keep the kids from being killed or castrated.

    Point: Women think that they are keeping their man and the men of other women alive by keeping firearms out of the men’s possession. Simple as that. Secondarily, they are keeping their kids from being killed by accident (and so favor firearm locks). Women think that they are being the heroines of their own stories, and saving the men and children from their folly. The net effect, however, is equivalent to that of the White Feather social phenomenon in WW I [2]: it doesn’t save the men, it kills them. [3]

    This is not a condemnation of women, but rather a note on how men and women’s specializations (evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) [4]) differ. If you want to see what women are good at, watch a man trying to raise children vs. a woman trying to raise children, or for that matter watch an Xy couple trying to stay married.

    So, what women’s behavior re: “guns in the US” means is that women haven’t changed much since the Greek dark ages. Nor have men. They are locked in the tragedy of their evolutionary stable strategies. It also tells you that neither side need be right – When an ESS results in species extinction, well, the species goes extinct, although some variant of the species may survive through luck or mutation.

    ****************************
    1] “Where have all the flowers gone” was an early anti-war song, and emphasized how women couldn’t marry crosses in a cemetary, and would wither like the flowers if the men’s hero stories killed the men.

    “Ruby, don’t take your love to town” was once considered the final and most successful of the anti-war songs. Note that it emphasizes that both the men’s and women’s hero stories can end in disaster.

    2] This URL, as you might expect, emphasizes the loss caused by the white feather activities: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/nov/11/first-world-war-white-feather-cowardice

    3] Here is an early Greek myth in which a real hero is killed by his wife’s actions (taken on the advice of an obvious foe of her husband) while trying to preserve their marriage:
    https://www.thoughtco.com/how-did-greek-hero-hercules-die-118952
    Women’s hero stories are as hard to live in real life as men’s stories. Women tend to be a bit more gullible than men, being faced with a hero story whose outcome depends more on luck of the draw in choosing her man than on any action subsequent to the choice and thus being rewarded less for skepticism than for blind faith. Deianeira had faith in the wrong entity, and ended up with no family at all (and quite likely a very guilty conscience).
    The Samson and Delila story could be taken as a second example, even one closer to the “white feather” events, for in this story Delila is deliberately trying to kill her husband in order to please her relatives.

    4] Definition and discussion of ESS:
    https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199830060/obo-9780199830060-0228.xml

    • Thanks: Dieter Kief
  114. @Anon

    San Franshitsco needs a new prosecutor that simply tells the business community that he won’t prosecute business owners that kill thieves. What needs to happen is the business community telling the gov’t how the cow is going to eat the cabbage (twist on a Texas expression) and just start killing the criminals. This is the application of common sense, nothing more.

    If I were dictator, there would be no prisons. There would only be one law as regards to violence. Anyone that uses violence in any manner is deemed a predator. All predators get killed on their first offense at the discretion of the victim, not some asshole judge. Any victim that spares the criminal becomes responsible for their future actions.

    Crimes not involving violence means working to make restitution at 5 times the loss rate which can’t happen while sitting in prison where the citizenry is currently victimized by the gov’t to provide food, clothing, shelter and medical care for human trash. There would be no street cops but more detectives, forensics professionals and their support staff to discover criminals not caught in the act. Any adult that wants to be armed can be armed and the weapons training open to the useless street cop now is made available to the citizenry free of cost.

    All welfare is ended for anyone physically able to work. The gov’t would be the employer of last resort with lousy jobs that refurbish infrastructure or provide some beneficial service for basic food, clothing, shelter and a minimum of spending money. There would be no option to just sit around and live off the rest of the population.

    The added benefit of this approach is that school board meeting, meetings where the gov’t official and the citizenry share a space becomes one where the politician is no longer protected for his actions and policies. There would be an overnight change in attitude as to who reports to whom.

    • Replies: @Nancy
    , @Anymike
  115. @CelestiaQuesta

    Minor correction needed: unless it’s changed, State and Federal gas taxes are a fixed number of cents per gallon, not a percentage. Now, if a State levies a sales tax, I grant your statement as valid.

  116. Dystopian says:
    @Ratiocinator

    If you take out the gun murders commit ed by blacks and hispanics in this country, we have one of the lowest rates of gun homicide in the first world. It isn’t white people who are shooting up the place. Mass shootings committed by whites are widely publicized but it’s hard to find anything on the mayhem committed by blacks and hispanics every week in Chicago or Philadelphia. You may buy into the propaganda but it does not take much digging to find the truth. Get off your posterior and learn something.

    • Thanks: Ben the Layabout
  117. @SafeNow

    That allegation is certainly a plausible one. For historical interest, and a question that be broached very few places except like Unz. Three or maybe even two generations back, most American cities had large White populations. People lived, worked, played in the big city. Then things began to change. What, precisely, were the factors that drove away Whites and the quality of life in these city went to shit? Numerous examples exist: Detroit, Baltimore, etc.

    • Replies: @The True Nolan
  118. @Alrenous

    false
    the black/white crime ratio was the same in the 50s, actually probably a bit worse

    there has never been a time when black crime was low
    fatherlessness is not the cause
    biology is

  119. @Richard B

    The Republican Party is by definition the Party of those who really never care for society, justice and other like matters and so it was since Lincoln. In particular they never cared for the Blacks : they just used them to destroy their economic competitors. You join them only for personal advantages. Me seems that was always the name of the game. The Democratic Party was always the party of control-freaks, since Jackson, and of war without end.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  120. @Mefobills

    My uncle told me that some of his best sergeants in Vietnam were black. Could it be that blacks might actually have something useful to offer the world if a regimented, disciplined framework is imposed on them? As opposed to “doin’ they thang.”

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @Thim
  121. @Ratiocinator

    your statement is totally false

    you depend on a very limited definition of “mass shooting” that effectively forces it to be defined as “…done by a white person”
    the MAJORITY by far of mass shootings, which are shootings of multiple people at one time, are done by blacks

    NOT gang-related, but black related, meaning someone got dissed or something and they came and shot up a bunch of people

  122. @Jimmy le Blanc

    You would have an Irish problem. They would still be speaking their own dialect, their mean IQ would still be one standard deviation below average, boxing would be their main get-ahead in life, they would take delight in shooting down all intellectuals.

    • Replies: @Anon
  123. @Ratiocinator

    “Any simple minded moron would know that most mass shootings are committed by white males between the ages of 18 and 21, or a bit higher.”

    You’re half right. While not all simple-minded morons would “know that most mass shootings are committed by white males”, it’s certainly true that only a simple-minded moron could fall for that.

    • Thanks: Charon
  124. Mefobills says:
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    Could it be that blacks might actually have something useful to offer the world if a regimented, disciplined framework is imposed on them? As opposed to “doin’ they thang.

    Yeah sure.

    You have empathy in your heart if you want good things for other racial groups.

    In other words, you can be a racist and have empathy at the same time. It is a Jewish idea that “racists” are somehow defectives. That sort of brainwashing is so that normies don’t take a close look at the Jew, or for that matter any sort of oligarchical overlord class. They want you to not have “bad thoughts” to self-censor. If you are a white racist, then you are Hitler, and want Jews dead… right?

    When you think in racial terms, then allowing blacks to live in accordance with their racial predilections is a kindness.

    A regimented disciplined framework for blacks is a BLACK PATRIARCHY. The black men and the white men patriarchy (no Jews) get together and work things out.

    You’ve already answered the question, with your example of the military. Blacks do fine in the military.

    Booker T. Washington pretty much had it figured out, but he was thwarted by the (((usual))) suspects.

  125. As both an Arizona resident and a committed non-voter, I’m almost tempted to register to vote just to be able to cast another vote for Masters.

    But then I remind myself of the overtly criminal acts surrounding the last major election in this state (the one that gave us two Democrat Senators that EVERYONE here loathes and certainly didn’t vote for). I also remind myself of the obvious fact that the Deep State targets populists like Masters witha vengeance and will ensure that he’s defeated, either by stealing the election from him or having him “meet with an unfortunate accident” (murder by a niggroe thug?) just before the voting starts.

    • Replies: @Not you
  126. Nancy says:
    @RoatanBill

    I agree with most of this… but, maybe business owners could just legally taze thieves… shooting might just ‘muddy the waters’ in the legalization effort. BTW, anywhere in the world where policies like these are in effect? and what are the results? rate of stealing drop when losing a hand is the penalty, etc?

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  127. CSFurious says:

    I heard a statistic that only 6 out of 1,000 Americans are married. I wonder what it is when just applied to Blacks. I often call them “Fatherless Ghetto Thugs”.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  128. Mefobills says:
    @Colin Wright

    Consistently, blacks have proven reluctant to return to Africa. What is there to feel guilty about? Merchants should have bought them and set them free?

    You have to pay them to leave. It is basic psychology… they don’t want to go because it is scary and unknown. So, you convince them the new place is not scary, and help ease the transition.

    But, that is not possible as long as a privateering creditor oligarchy runs the country. The last chance was Lincoln, but he was assassinated.

    A smaller minority of Negroes wanted to leave, especially during hard economic times, on the Black Star Line.

    https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/black-star-line-1919-1923/

    What is not said at above link, is that Garvey was jacked with and harassed by the usual suspects, who did not want negroes to leave.

  129. G J T says:

    Vance is a two-faced race-mixer who would be considered a liberal just a few decades ago, if that. He’s garbage.

    Masters has said some good things, but we’ll find out real quick how “based” he is when he’s forced into a situation where anti-semitism or Our Greatest Ally™️ are the matter at hand. Remember Joe Kent? Yea, I’m not holding my breath for anything better.

    It simply doesn’t matter how “based” any politician is if they’re going to just grovel to the Synagogue of Satan if pressed. Every other problem America has is a symptom of our Jewish problem.

    I suppose DeSantis is sort of an exception, because what he’s doing is actually clearing a path forward towards what is likely our only chance of salvaging what’s left of white America. If enough state level politicians start following his lead, highlighting and exacerbating the irreconcilable differences of the peoples inhabiting this “country,” there will be no way to justify forcibly holding this thing together.

  130. Mr Darcy says:
    @Alrenous

    Good Lord! What a lot of verbiage. Useless and boring.

    Here’s the thing: Segregation always worked and will work again. It’s the *only* sensible, practical, or practicable solution. SEGREGATION. This is not rocket science, and you don’t need to go on yammering about statistics and heredity and all the rest of it.

    DON’T HATE; SEPARATE!

    Just keep saying it. Don’t stop.

    SEGREGATION. The ONLY way forward.

    • Replies: @beau
    , @Alrenous
  131. Mr Darcy says:
    @Notsofast

    IT began to change when everything they do began to change: when they began to get money; a regular income. That’s the Great Society. LBJ.

    Negroes were *always* violent. They have adolescent emotions. It’s as simple as that. But before they had money buy buy guns, they stabbed each other or threw lye in one another’s faces (specifically a brand called “Red Devil” lye). They always had lye on hand to make soap in their back yards. (This was obviously before your time.) It was always in the morning paper how Queen Esther Dubose had thrown Red Devil lye into the face of Johnnie Mae Battle over some controversy or other. Or that Tom Brown had stabbed Leroy Greene at some ni**er dive on the East Boundary for (reason).

    This is the way. It’s who and what they are. Nothing will change that. Nowadays they have a guaranteed cash income, so they have guns, but that is entirely incidental to anything.

    Guns are immaterial to this or to school shootings and any of the rest of it (fill in the blank). The sensible thing would be to outlaw murder, but that’s too obvious, so they go for the guns.

    You can’t fix stupid.

  132. Overall a very well argued essay. A few criticisms:

    The rates for Blacks are even worse than reported. In fairness, so are other races. Why? Simple: No one includes “assailant unknown” category (roughly 30% of homicides.) It is intellectually dishonest to omit this category. Most likely, it’s simply an oversight. Admittedly it’s true that we don’t have precise data, but reasonable assumptions can (and should) be made. For example, if Blacks commit about 57% of the known homicides, isn’t it reasonable to assign them 57% of the unknown too? If not, why not? Doing so brings their share up to nearly 75% of all killings.

    At first, Anglin’s claim that Blacks commit 1000% mre murders than Whites sounds like hyperbole. But it’s not. Blacks kill at roughly six times everyone else’s rate per-capita. When compared to Whites, then it is closer to ten times, which is 1000%.

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/fbi-murders-up-4901-black-share-of-known-murder-offenders-reaches-record-56-5/

    Another (from memory, simplified) few facts I keep in mind: Firearms by far are the preferred tool for killings in the USA. Of all killings, about 60% are suicides. Of the remainder, about 80% are young black and brown males shooting each other.

    “Baseless claims” when repeated in the mainstream media: This is, of course, often an attempt to discredit the opponent. But ironically, they do the opponent (Masters, here) a favor by merely mentioning his claim. To even mention an enemy’s (true) assertions, even with the intent to dismiss them as a lie, is very risky. This, I suspect, is why most propaganda is mostly of the “What we say is true, our enemy lies and is mentally ill (or racist, etc.)” with the the implication nearly always, that there is never a need to actually air the issues and investigate them. Of course, doing so might weaken the official propaganda.

  133. @Nancy

    When you realize that every gov’t needs routine criminals to scare the workers is when you wake up to the fact that every gov’t is nothing but a sophisticated mafia operation that extorts an enormous amount of wealth from workers to ensure that the common man is forever unable to change his plight. Common sense solutions to kill off the criminals is never an option because it’s bad for politicians that want people disarmed for the politician’s safety. Why else would all gov’ts make it difficult to impossible for the average person to protect himself while offering only phony rhetoric of ‘to serve and protect’ the public? The political class is the highest order of criminality in any jurisdiction.

    I don’t want to taze or incapacitate some POS that has decided with premeditation to do me harm; I want him dead. I want my natural right of self defense respected, under law if possible, but with or without law, I intend to assert my right. Any thinking person should realize that it is kill or be killed should a criminal target you, so obeying ridiculous laws, to be unarmed, is a guaranteed negative outcome.

    I ask you why you think you need some moral support from other countries to implement a plan that obviously terminated crime past the first offense, knowing that all the programs, money spent and rehabilitation efforts have failed for decades? Haven’t you got the self confidence to express your own opinion without holding a show of hands for support?

  134. Mr Darcy says:
    @Dr. Rock

    “If the general public knew this, like so many other indisputable facts, the entire discussion would change, … .”

    Rubbish. Wishful thinking. The mass of the population–to the extent that they think AT ALL–will think whatever their TV sets tell them to think. Nothing else matters. NOTHING.

  135. Not you says:
    @mocissepvis

    Fellow Arizonan and non-voter here. Masters won’t get any farther than the Deep State operatives/MIC interests and mob-alliances allow him. No one running for office can or will, plain and simple. It’s easy to forget the rich history of violence and corruption that’s embedded and part of the political fabric of the natural beauty of the state, if one is even aware of it. Just ask Dan Bolles or Michael Piper Collins.

    https://davidduke.com/mccains-zionist-mob-ties-suppressed-by-major-media/

    • Replies: @Not you
    , @Not you
    , @hhsiii
  136. @Anymike

    Is it good for the White People? I see no other alternative except partition and secession. I welcome any comments to the assent or dissent.

    • Replies: @Avery
  137. @Goddard

    Beyond theoretical. Impractical, impossible, and not doable. This is pure fantasy. Come back to Reality with resources, assets, opposition, tactics, strategy.

    “Let’s get together, yeah, yeah, yeah”.

    “Onward Christian Soldiers, marching as to war….”

    Show me some real world accomplishments in your chosen vocation or profession, not some bong is dong is gone, is wrong, not strong.

    Reads like a sucker ploy by a Sanhedrin. Send me the shekels that you dream on.

  138. beau says:

    divide the nation into at least 2, if not more, parts.

    i don’t want to live with those people and collectivists in general any more than they want to live in the same nation with me. give them a land area of their own so their violence is contained within their community and will continue until that community stands up, says ENOUGH and ends the problem itself. anything else is cheap talk leading to expensive bullshit.

    • Replies: @Anon
  139. Avery says:
    @Poupon Marx

    {I see no other alternative except partition and secession. I welcome any comments to the assent or dissent.}

    Partition and secession was tried in 1860s: it failed.
    The North crushed South’s attempt to secede.

    Any attempt by any sates(s) to secede will be similarly crushed by the Federal Government, which is far more powerful now — technology, social control, monetary control*, etc — than the North was vis-à-vis the South during the Civil War (…War of Invasion and Conquest).

    On a separate note: how exactly one would go about partitioning the US along White and Black lines What about the Hispanics?

    And despite what people might believe, there is no homogenous White population, politically speaking: anywhere from 30% to 40% of Whites despise the other Whites and wouldn’t want to live with them.
    ___________________________________________
    * to wit Canada: the peaceful anti-Covid truckers were crushed without use of force: their bank accounts were seized and they were treated by the State as criminals, terrorists.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @No Tattoos
  140. Not you says:
    @Not you

    I suppose it’s like the opening scene from David Lynch’s Blue Velvet everywhere in the world, actually. Underneath the idyllic and wholesome is an underworld of the violent and repulsive and disgusting. Full of symbolism if one pays close attention:

  141. Bo Bo says:

    I have a perfect solution for (nearly most) gun crime. It is not discriminatory or racist. It affects ALL men who commit crimes with guns. It does not affect law abiding gun owners. Any male who commits a gun crime will be castrated and then imprisoned. Castration should reduce his aggressive tendencies. After prison (unless they are in for life or executed), if the former perp commits another gun crime, after prison, if he is black deport him to Liberia, Africa. If white, Hispanic, of Asian, deport him elsewhere. If a female can legally have an abortion to murder her unborn child, then a male can be castrated to significantly reduce gun crime. This solution will preserve the second amendment rights for law abiding citizens and very significantly reduce gun crime. How does all this apply to any women committing gun crimes? Someone else can figure that out.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  142. Mefobills says:
    @Avery

    Partition and secession was tried in 1860s: it failed.
    The North crushed South’s attempt to secede.

    Lincoln wanted to send the negro packing. Lincoln was looking at Panama as a destination country, but then he was assassinated, and by the (((usual))) agents from London. The native Indians in panama weren’t thrilled about the idea.

    The south was falling back into London’s Colonial System, and did not want to pay the Morrill tariffs, which were the real reason for the war.

    Basically, if you go to skoool in America you have to unbrainwash yourself (I’m American).

    OK? The south would have filled up with Negroes, who were tractors, to then grow king cotton, to then export said cotton to England.

    The North wanted to industrialize, and wanted the South to send cotton north.

    The tragedy is that the mammonites in the North were greedy and refused to rebate the Morrill tariffs back to the South, and hence there was war. There is every indication post war, that Lincoln wanted negro removal, and he wanted to industrialize the South.

    So, now we have this:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10897099/American-tourist-causes-25-000-damage-throwing-electric-scooter-Romes-Spanish-Steps.html

    Notice that it is black Americans destroying remnants of an ancient civilization. It is something they did not build, and probably could not build unless “guided” and controlled by whites or north east Asians.

    Generally, if you have a group of people who are ugly and stupid, they resent the population they are hosted in. They especially resent something if it is beautiful.

    I was once in Norway, and my fellow Americans, many of who were ugly by comparison to the Norwegians, would not go out in public.

    One of the reasons Jews are for immigration, is because many Jews are ugly and they don’t want to stand out. They want to be able to “swim” in the population, and not be noticed.

    No democracy has the civilizational testicular fortitude to prevent ugly and stupid people from breeding, nor does democracy have the ability to eject negroes or jews.

    • Agree: Druid55
    • Replies: @A B Coreopsis
  143. Agent76 says:

    January 10th, 2022 Innocents Betrayed – Gun Control History – Genocide Disarming Populations

    170,000,000. That’s the number of civilians that have been murdered by their own governments in the 20th century alone. 170,000,000 men, women, and children who were defenseless to protect themselves. 170,000,000 victims of gun control. You have never seen anything like Innocents Betrayed.



    Video Link

    May 31, 2022 From Concealed Carry to Eliminating Permits, Gun Restrictions Have Loosened Since Sandy Hook

    KENNESAW, Ga. — One day before a mass shooting in Texas killed 19 fourth-graders and two adults, former vice president Mike Pence stood onstage at a campaign rally here and praised Governor Brian Kemp for eliminating the need to get a gun permitto carry a concealed weapon in public, drawing cheers from Kemp’s delighted Republican base.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/05/28/nation/many-states-gun-restrictions-have-loosened-since-sandy-hook/

    • Replies: @Druid55
    , @Ben the Layabout
  144. @fray juan crespi

    but one wonders what a stanford duke grad is doing in the sonoran desert

    Yes, that’s a BIG bright red flag, just as DeSantis’s Yale background is for him.

  145. Thim says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Emil, you rightly say Thiel is a spook. Who did you think Anglin works for?

  146. Ohh brother . . .

    let’s play the numbers game to the assail — again

    in 2020 there were 10,000 black citizens who were murdered. For the sake of being generous, let’s say that all ten were killed by guns. examining that number all by itself would lead less critical thinking policy makers to assume, that gun violence is the fault of skin color.

    “Those darn blacks . . . if could just get rid of them the world would be so cool.”

    But anyone seeking to develop policy would or should hardly be so tunneled. Because it just happens that those ten thousand deaths and let’s be generous, let’s add five thousand murderers, assuming that each person was killed by one person, so the generosity makes sense. So 15,000 murderous black people. Now Mr. Masters is claiming that its blacks is such and such place are indicative of the whole. So in the mind of Mr Masters

    0.0041208791% of the black population represent some character of the hole. uhhh excuse me. But if I were on Mr. Maters staff, i caution him against making such a generalization because on its face — it’s wrong . And suggests that the murder rate in Chicago is not indicative of blacks in general. And uh oh . . .

    even by examination of the back population in Chicago, say some 858,555 citizens the percentage engaged in murder would be a whopping

    1.7471216171%

    I hate to break the news but 1.8% of a population is unlikely to be an indication of the whole – even in Chicago.

    And note, the numbers regarding murder were the national, not merely Chicago. So blacks who murder is apparently a rare anomaly in Chicago or the nation as a whole. I hate the term racist but ion this instance, the comments around based on their content and Mr. Masters own rhetoric sound like the old dog whistle of color baiting for votes.

    Now crime response is always an issue. But the depth about crime really sounds bold and new, but point of fact, its old. it will work, because most people are not going to critically think out the gentleman’s comments. They are going to fall back of expedient reasons to vote.

    Part of this attitude is of course the backlash for vocal advocates concerning the nation being foundationally racist.

    Additional note: blacks have left cities they consider too high in crime in the same way and for the same reasons people flee such conditions all over the world. i have never found any unique virtue in whiteness regarding a response to crime than one finds anywhere else.

    • Replies: @Ben the Layabout
  147. Thim says:
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    Sir Launce, your Uncle lied to you.

  148. @Sir Launcelot Canning

    What was America doing right in 1952 that they are screwing up so bad in 2022?

    America of 1952 wasn’t a decaying nation of drugged zombies from dysfunctional, broken homes. Niggroes were also kept in their rightful place, whereas today they’re allowed to roam wild like feral animals.

  149. I love how apologetic White people have become when they refer to black criminality….
    the fact that he use the adjective “frankly” as though self conscious it indicative of the reluctance that so many Whites have about telling the truth about black crime.

  150. Mefobills says:
    @RoatanBill

    Individualists, Libertarians, and Anarchists are all hypocrites.

    All humans live in a society, and are only individuals if said society bequeaths it. Your range of free-dumb is birthright from what your ancestors carved out and handed you.

    I ran several successful businesses and learned to only hire blacks as employees. I was invited to their weddings and funerals and attended them.

    The anarchist hires only negroes, who are known to form in-groups.

    Hondurans are Mestizos, or Amerindians. Those Hondurans who have small amounts of negro admixture will never admit to it, due to social stigma. Negroes are what 1 or 2 percent of the population?

    You are not a hard target by carrying a gun, you are a hard target by virtue of your in-group of negroes for whom you have attracted and attached to. Your in-group is a posse, and there is strength in numbers, not being an individual.

    Here is James Frazier, the Golden Bough, on how Roman social fabric was destroyed. Rome was basically fascist, a form of government good for white people.

    Greek and Roman society was built on the concept of the subordination of the individual to the community, of the citizen to the state. It set the safety of the commonwealth as the supreme aim of conduct, above the safety of the individual. Trained from infancy in this unselfish ideal, the citizens devoted their lives to the public service and were ready to lay them down for the common good; or if they shrank from supreme sacrifice, it never occurred to them that they acted otherwise than basely in preferring their personal existence to the interests of their country.

    Frazier goes on to blame this “individualism” on the Oriental Religions (middle east), including Christianity.

    “The communion of the soul with god and its eternal salvation was all that was worth living for.”

    The hyper-individualistic oriental religions today include materialism and liberalism. He who dies with the most toys wins!

    Fascist Italy kept Christianity, and it seemed to work out ok.

    I also formed a posse of negroes when I was a bouncer. But, I didn’t lie to myself about their motives – they were hunting white women, and I allowed only a few of them into the club, under the proviso they come to my aide during an altercation. I also used them as a shield to ward off other negroes wanting to get in.

    You should stop lying to yourself. Anarchists are not virtuous.

    • Thanks: Mario Partisan
  151. Thim says:
    @John DoeYo

    John Doe, just check in with Anglin’s handlers at the FBI. They will assign him a new address after the Rwanda site fails.

  152. @SafeNow

    They want to ruin your suburbs, and, they will.

    It all depends upon where those suburbs are located. If they’re in Blue states where the population has already been largely disarmed, then yeah, there will definitely be a niggroe invasion and conquest. In the Deep Red states? Don’t bet on it being so easy for (((them))) to destroy the White QOL with their armies of simian criminal stooges. Bullets aren’t called “niggroe stoppers” for nothing.

    • Troll: The Real World
  153. White People are better off voting Democrats: Why, you ask so succinctly. I’ll tell you…

    did you ever wonder why most of this black crime is in Dem cities with many times run by black pols, black police chiefs and DA? Well, it’s because they don’t give a shit about those blacks who kill each other, that’s why…(blacks seems to have a pecking order on whom they like or don’t like, kinda like Bantustans in Southern Africa.

    Dems are not necessarily racists. However, they know better than anyone else the nature of the black race. Therefore they have perfected, or close to it, the science of “containment”. It’s all about letting blacks do what they naturally are inclined to do, (violence and chaos) but within the scope of segregated spaces.

    By keeping blacks segregated in the hoods, they can leave us and the black bourgeoisie hell alone. The black bourgeoisie see themselves as “honorary Whites” and thus play along with whatever the White Massa tells them; they have no choice.

    Republicans, on the other hand, are too busy imploring their bullshit Christian morality, and literally want to see integration of all races and Americanization of all citizens who live in America. Oddly, it’s Republicans who are idealistic about race, and as long as “Jesus” speaks to them in tongues they’ll follow the “human brotherhood” meme ’till the end of days.

    In the meantime, I’ll vote Dem so that they’ll continue delivering on the killing fields in dah Ghetto.

    • LOL: Ben the Layabout
    • Replies: @Jimmy le Blanc
  154. @Anymike

    The practical reason why people don’t want to split the USA is because they want to keep the common market the USA represents, they want to keep their federal benefits and their federal subsidies, and they want the right to live anywhere and travel anywhere.

    The solution is not to necessarily break up (or secede) from the US. That inspiring idea might, alas, be politically impossible. (Wasn’t is tried once before?) Indeed, an attempt to break up the ‘glorious union’ might produce another extended period of organized destruction, mayhem, and violence. But Americans could possibly agree to (1) scale back and de-fang the Federal government and, from there (2) empower/allow each individual state to be more independent and self-governing.

    Let Blue states go blue and Red states go red. America’s population has gotten too huge and too diverse for the present One Size Fits All arrangement. The Federal government has also gotten far too intrusive, wasteful and dangerous. Time for change.

    Americans could still travel freely and enjoy the benefits of belonging to one powerful and coordinated country. Our nationhood would endure, but with far greater cultural and legal diversity within each semi-independent state. Scale back Federal waste, power and tyranny. Restore independence and self-government.

    This might be the only practical way forward.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  155. @Bo Bo

    Since this is such a well thought out proposal for men criminals, I suggest sewing on the liberated balls on to the women for women criminals.

    My proposal makes as much sense as yours, that is, none at all.

  156. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    Given that the slaves were already slaves in Africa — and often headed for a fate considerably worse than that awaiting them in the Americas — why should anyone have a guilty conscience about transporting them from there to here?

    ((Jews)) and their subhuman partners in crime transport African slaves into the West, rewrite history to memory hole their central role and simultaneously scapegoat all Whites for their crimes, and you don’t have a problem with that?

  157. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @René Fries

    So you think the Zionist/Judeofascist 9/11 inside job and subsequent MSM and political class campaign to lie American into endless ((Jew)) and Zionist enriching wars was just and smart? Even though the ((Jews)) and their subhuman partners in crime have used some of the proceeds to wage a simultaneous, insidious war on Christianity, Whites, Western values, Western Civilization, etc — all under the auspices of ((Jew)) enriching, humanity destroying “globalization”?

    And then they have the temerity to declare to the West You will own nothing and be happy?

    I suppose you considered the Zionist and Judeofascist Moneychanger conspiracy to set up the Fed and start WW1 and WW2 a smart move as well?

    I don’t really care what ((Jews)) claim Islam is doing in Islamic lands. They’re allied with Wahhabi and ISIS “Islamofacists” in the Petrodollar Ponzi scheme anyway — so subhuman ((Jew)) stooges like Joe “I am a Zionist” Biden could enrich himself and has gang of scum, and enslave humanity.

    And Iranian “Islamofascists” are simply defending themselves against Judeofascists and Zionists.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  158. Blaming crime on the people doesn’t stop crime. In a healthy society there is a small number who chose a criminal life because of psychological problems. In the US empire peasants lives are worth nothing, a cop can execute a person because they tried to run away, The empire approve piracy, mass murder, police robbery of peasants{asset forfeiture} because your poor you don’t need the money you saved, terrorism in other country’s,murdering foreign leaders who dare to mention the Empire crimes, and they say respect law. The only reason the US isn’t being torn apart is that almost 10 million of those peasants are on government issued untested anti-psychotics

  159. @anon

    The mistake was made when the Papists were allowed to get a foothold which directly lead to the invasion of the Jews.

    All immigration has been bad for America and Americans. It was the Irish and the Germans who let the coloreds run wild.

  160. Alrenous says: • Website
    @bispora

    All surface ships have been worth more as scrap than afloat since like gen 2 submarines. You can neutralize an aircraft carrier with a few Cessnas. I don’t mean by retrofitting weapons to them. Nowadays the pilot doesn’t even have to be in the plane.

    In related news, tanks have been obsolete since the RPG, and perhaps since the bazooka.

  161. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Charles Martel France

    Quite possibly, yes, though it’s more American culture as a whole rather than specifically the DNC.

    The difference being that Bantu-Americans could be unsabotaged, whereas deprecated-American Satanism is so deeply ground in you can guarantee it’s never coming out again.

  162. JR Foley says:
    @A. Clifton

    Master bait indeed —Buffalo — Texas —black as coal—indeed indeed indeed.
    Zylenskyy will be freed up in a few weeks time–he can head to DC and tend to matters with Avoz.

  163. KenH says:

    Republican candidates generally run as right wing then become centrists once elected. Trump is the most recent and best example but George W. Bush was another one. Dubya opposed affirmative action as a candidate then promptly did a 180 after becoming president. Nixon opposed busing before becoming president then enforced the unconstitutional court ruling mandating it.

    Most Democrats run as centrists but once elected govern as leftists and far leftists. Obama is the best example of this. Obama ran as a post racial mulatto then the mask fell after he was elected and he revealed himself as just a more articulate and slimmer Al Sharpton.

  164. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Richard B

    Recently I’ve been thinking about how everyone is in a bubble. A tiny bubble. Everyone has been out of touch since at least 1945.

    We know fuck all about our fellow serfs.

    Small example: a show with 6 million in ratings is considered a smash hit.

    There are well over 300 million Americans. Oops. We don’t even know what TV everyone else is watching.

    Game of Thrones, which “everyone” was talking about, was watched by at most 14 million. Not even approaching 5%.

    There’s those motivational-poster episodes for teenagers which sometimes say that nobody fits in. Usually motivational posters are comically mendacious, but this one might not be wrong? No wonder everyone is so insecure about fitting in if it’s so blatantly not true. Nearly everyone is putting up a false facade, and it’s not just a bit of spackle here and there.

    It’s probably intentional. An obvious divide-and-conquer motive.
    The social norms are clearly specifically designed to ensure you never really get to know anyone unless you absolutely have to, making the bubbles as thickly siloed as possible.

  165. Dr Do Max says:
    @Chris Mallory

    You wouldn’t know jack fucking shit about Jesus or the Bible, without “the Papists”, retard.

    So take it easy, huh.

    • Replies: @American Bulwark
  166. Anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    Your post explains much that I hadn’t realized. Thanks for the description. The US might end up after the next social reorganization with a patchwork of societies much like the society you describe. Alternative is ending up like Union of South Africa. Note that in your system the under-85 IQ people can still find work with animal husbandry or as low level drug vendors/thieves. There are ecological/social niches for such people, and they will fill those niches. In the US, the niches of “vote farm” and “social worker/government regulator” is much greater than the niche for drug vendors/thieves in your society, and the population of these niches is correspondingly greater.
    For a discussion of why this is so in the US, and much of the First and Third World, see G. Copleys’ Uncivilization: Urban geopolitics in a time of chaos, 2012. Copley does not mention the bankruptcy of cities, but does explain their political rise very well. In the meantime, I suspect that Roatan Island will be able to retain its independence through the approaching troubles, in the same way that Singapore has since WW II.

    As for Mefoblis’ comments, the US is not a “proposition nation”, as, perhaps, was the old USSR. The supreme goal in life is not living up to a list of propositions. The idea that life is living up to a list of socially approved propositions is what has left us unable to define “woman”. The supreme goal of life is, if anything, the respect of your fellow group members, who are usually in your ethnic group and related about as closely as one of your more distant (but traceable) cousins. Respect comes from deeds, and the criteria for respect is, like most of what’s important in human society, usually too complex to write down. Examples: think of what it takes to give a Black gang member respect, or what it takes to get respect in the Democratic Party. Life today is largely about the collision between different groups with different ideas of respect.

    If you’ve put together a group that supports you when you’re not around (grants you social legitimacy), and you have to carry a firearm to do that, well, good for you.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  167. @Dr Do Max

    Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason, Part I, Chapter I …

    “I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.

    I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church. All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.

    Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and tortuous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we call it the word of a demon than the word of God. It is a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind; and, for my part, I sincerely detest it, as I detest everything that is cruel.”

  168. Anymike says:
    @RoatanBill

    You have a career as a dystopian novelist ahead of you. You need to consider the “what can go wrong” factor. That’s as a novelist. My thought about writing opinion is that you do not as I term it, divide your views. What I mean by that is that you are not obligated to present other people’s views or account for them. But that’s in opinion writing. In fiction writing, maybe it’s different.

    One way you could do it is to have some sort of “director” or member of the “world controller” board or whatever explain to the naive or idealistic character what the history of the situation is and what things were done to prevent past troubles from arising again. That’s in a pro-establishmentarian novel.

    The other kind is the one where the rebel is the hero. The rebel can either be trying to restore freedom and equity (what could go wrong?) or be trying to restore virility and strength to a weak breed of people.

    Take your pick. Either way, it leads to dystopia. But you don’t have to say that. You are in the entertainment business if you are a novelist.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  169. abcdef says:
    @Arminius1933

    what is needed is a functioning democracy.. one that can overpower, subdue and contain or eliminate the corporate monopoly powers that are used by the oligarch to own, rule, keep hidden, and to profit from everything.
    It is these corporate powers over media, physical and intangible assets, and governments that deliver ownership and control over what happens in our world to the corporations. The MSM is a set of privately owned entities (corporations); its source of financing comes from nearly every other privately owned entity and from government itself (advertising is tax deductible). Collectively, monopoly power is established in private corporate hands. Monopoly power controls “content access” to the media, and content access determines not only the narrative but also it provides the source of details that support the information that makes the narrative seem relevant, accurate or true.

    It is impossible to hold content providers responsible for their corruptions without defining false or misleading contents and the context of their narratives. Content which contains details that are lies, or out of character contextual claims or that corrupt the truth in some way should make the provider of that content responsible for their corruptions if such content is published and causes a member of the audience actual or implied harms?

    The media presents information, 1st amendment guarantees content providers the freedom to express themselves, and it guarantees publishers the right to publish content provider expressions such media select to publish. Can anyone find anywhere in the constitution that courts are exempt from making whole members of the audience of media presented content, who are harmed by content presented on, in or through media?

    As things stand today, the media has more say-so over what goes on the world and in USA governed America than all of the other forces from what ever source you can name.. including what the president, VP, Congress, democratic or Republican party have to say.. The privately owned media is so powerful it can bring down a politician, deny a writer market publication of a book, article or whatever and it can promote a person to President or defeat a person running for political office, it can impeach the President, it can stop, start or continue a war. The media has more power than the government, and the media is better support by advertising dollars, paid mostly from other corporations, than are governments themselves, as governments must be content with tax dollars. Corrupt narrative or false or misleading content cannot be allowed in the political space, if ever, humanity is to have a government which responds to the will and wish of the majority it governs.

    The over arching need is to hold content providers who distort any published untruth media financially responsible for their distortions. To do that, I propose that tort law, could serve that purpose..
    If we don’t clean falsehood and context corruption out of content, and make those who generate the content the media distributes responsible for corruptions in the content, we will never, not ever, discover our government responding to the demands of the governed. Governments that fail to respond to the demands of the governed, are tyrannies.

    I think we can blame the distortion of the truth about gun violence on the content providers that produce the content the media presents to the governed public. Its the privately owned corporate sponsored content that media presents to media audiences that is the real problem, because its exposure to the masses, keeps us so polarized our votes are cancelled out. Without the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, it is impossible to keep the electorate well enough informed, to gain a concensus on who to elect next and to arm our vote with orders which obligate elected politicians to conform their activities to the will of those who voted to elect them. Split the vote factionalism has allowed the corporations to control staffing of our government.

  170. Anymike says:
    @mark green

    The left is the branch that has a problem with this idea. The way I put it us, conservatives are willing to let Portland be Portland and Boise be Boise. The liberals and progressives are not willing. They may say they are but look carefully and listen carefully, and you will see that they always are looking for some way to subsume traditional elements into their Popular Front coalition and take over education.

    Except for the hippies, what is left of that subculture, they can’t handle just being a subculture like everyone else can. They want hegemony.

  171. Anon[325] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Mallory

    Protestant colonists facilitated the importation of slaves into North America, not the Papacy. From the 17th century to the early 19th century the vanquished Irish Catholics were, for the most part, still in Ireland under the boot of the victorious Protestants. German Catholics had yet to arrive in large numbers to America. Was it one or was it two Catholics that signed the Declaration of Independence?

    • Agree: JR Foley
  172. Avery says:
    @Avery

    Interesting article about US Navy super-carriers — at one of the US MSMs, of all places.

    (even the Warmongering Propaganda Channels apparently have to acknowledge some inconvenient facts.)

    [US Navy aircraft carriers may be useless in a war with China]
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-navy-aircraft-carriers-may-be-useless-in-a-war-with-china/ar-AAYgqkw?bk=1&bk=1&ocid=msedgntp&cvid=0e7b035dae2845679e41dc79ec63c652

    [Yet these capital ships are also large and tempting targets for anti-ship missiles. Now China, which has missiles that can strike ships up to 2,500 miles away, has reportedly found a way to track U.S. aircraft carriers in real-time.]

    [Last June, a Chinese satellite equipped with artificial intelligence detected the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman during naval exercises off the coast of Long Island, New York, allowing China’s military to follow the ship’s movements, the South China Morning Post first revealed.
    Task & Purpose has not independently verified the claim made by Chinese space scientists that they had spotted the Harry S. Truman. The Navy referred questions about the possible implications of this claim to the Pentagon, which did not provide a comment for this story.]

    [“Given China’s long-range anti-ship ballistic missiles, the only hope that a U.S. carrier has for surviving a battle near Taiwan is to hide from Chinese sensors,” Heath told Task & Purpose. “If this report is true, then the carriers’ last defense against anti-ship ballistic missiles is now gone. The carrier can be found, identified, and tracked, and that data undoubtedly can be passed to Chinese targeteers who could then target the warship.”]

    [“The military officers I’ve talked to said they have been planning for years to deploy carriers so far away from Taiwan that they’re out of range of the [Chinese] missiles, but frankly, also irrelevant to the combat,” Heath said. “The bottom line is if the U.S. is relying on carriers to save Taiwan, that’s a lost cause. It’s just not viable.”]

  173. Moe Gibbs says:

    “Black people, factually.”

    FIFY

  174. @Anonymous

    I should have mentioned that Roatan Island is a tourist destination with an international airport and two cruise ship docks, one exclusively for Carnival. Roatan is the above water projection of the 2nd largest barrier reef in the world and attracts divers from all over. My wife and I discovered Roatan when our Dallas dive club announced it as the next club destination. Everyone liked it so much that it was also the following year’s destination.

    The island has the best sand beach I’ve ever experienced and I’ve been to almost all the Caribbean islands and the Tahitian chain. There are numerous resorts, one world class golf course, gated communities with million dollar homes, and many less prosperous communities. There’s one primary paved road, no stop signs or traffic lights and I might see a cop a few times a year. I drove for years with no license plates on the vehicle and no one cared.

    Tourism is the major source of income for everyone on the island. The “white islanders” work for their family businesses while the black and hispanic work anything and everything available. Non residents (tourists, dive bums, etc) may not compete for work by law and that prohibition works around here.

    I met the first illiterate person in my life on the island and since discovered there’s a large segment that is both illiterate and innumerate. None of the people I’ve hired can do fractions, decimals, write an intelligible sentence in English or Spanish and they all speak Roaglish among themselves but can speak proper English when necessary. Roaglish is a term I coined which is a version of English I still can’t understand.

    To give you a taste of what it’s like having low IQ people as employees, one year, all the employees came to me as a group to ask if they were going to die because an eclipse was imminent. When Honduras decided to try daylight savings time one year, the employees wanted to know if they should come to work the new 7 o’clock or the old 7 o’clock. Seriously.

    I’ve closed all of our businesses since the covid shutdown. The island is limping along but I suspect major trouble when the US and Canadian tourists stay away because they are broke due to price inflation and their credit cards are maxed out. I’m waiting to see what happens by year end to determine if we start up again. When the SHTF, there will be no place unaffected but at least we won’t freeze.

    • Thanks: René Fries
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anonymous
  175. @White Men Are Awesome

    Agree. Republicans sell firearms to the very blacks that will murder them.

  176. @Anymike

    I’m and engineer and professional software developer. I have a very technical 1100 page book on Amazon that I estimate about 20,000 people worldwide can possibly comprehend.

    I don’t have an artistic bone in my body, so writing fiction isn’t possible. My mind simply won’t go there.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  177. @Mefobills

    The relationship between beauty and its appreciation by a culture is complex but certain observations can be made. In serious music, Meyerbeer, the most financially successful composer of the 19th century, produced the the most popular operas of the period. In this century, his reputation and appeal and productions have fallen to essentially zero. This is particularly striking as most western opera house Intendants are Jews (eg Gelb at the Met).

    As for the 20th century, the deeply ugly music of Schoenberg (despite academic promotion by the likes of Charles Rosen) continues to repel audiences and is a programming risk. This contrasts with the schmaltz of gay Jews (Copland, Bernstein, Gershwin, Sondheim etc) which is popular if musically insubstantial. The inability to create serious, timeless beauty across so many artistic fields is an ongoing irritation to those who otherwise control the western world.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  178. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    If we’re talking about mass shootings specifically, then the CIA was founded in 1947 and five years isn’t even enough for government workers to finish decorating their offices and settling in.

    Crime in general has been going up for over 120 years.

  179. Alrenous says: • Website
    @CSFurious

    The share of adults ages 25 to 54 who are currently married fell from 67% in 1990 to 53% in 2019,

    https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/

    Some great stats here too. https://www.brookings.edu/research/an-analysis-of-out-of-wedlock-births-in-the-united-states/
    “Black out-of-wedlock births would have increased only 40 percent as much.”

    Of course, as with Wikipedia, you have to rectify all their pious religious catechism. The stats are cool, the analysis is cope and lies.

  180. Alrenous says: • Website
    @American Bulwark

    Don’t you want to be Christian so you can learn to be an admirable pillar of the community like Dr Do Max here?

    Know them by their fruits. (Who said it?)

  181. Rooster15 says:
    @Emslander

    The pendulum has started to swing back, anyone else feel it? Some major cultural shifts have started to take place in the last few months, quite a few by comedians. Many might scoff at it, but comedians have a pretty good pulse of the nation. When you have big name guys starting to take shots at the approved narrative, you know something is afoot. Heck, even Kimmel last night took a quick jab at Biden with the “biracial commercial” comment right before the break. I would expect the suppression effort by the left to go into hyperdrive at this point; expect a complete meltdown in the next 6 months.

    • LOL: Charon
    • Replies: @Emslander
  182. Anymike says:
    @RoatanBill

    You never know, but it is an ordeal writing fiction and another ordeal marketing it. In our system, you need an agent and what are agents? They’re social climbers and all they care about is their own station in the business. The agents employ readers who very often are recent female graduates of Harvard or Yale. I don’t see why I should have to pass through someone who is so young they might still go to their pediatrician when they need a doctor to get my work read by a real person. My guess is, about one in 50 of these readers ever make it to senior agent or book editor. They’re not going to jeopardize their already slim chances for a full career for you no matter what the merit of your work may be.

    The publishing business is a sewer of antitrust violation, just like tech is. But who’s going to do anything about it? The people with the resources don’t need to, and the people who need to don’t have the resources.

    My situation is extremely bad in this business. Everything I have written or want to write is a one-off in its genre or marketing category. The agents especially don’t like that because they specialize themselves and want writers who will do the same kind of work over and over again. The publishers are not so hostile to that although they want writers with a steady market too.

    A while back, I saw a feature about writers worldwide who were trying to break into their national markets. The one from Sweden said, because I’m Swedish I have the choice of having an agent or submitting my own work directly to the publisher.

    Well, I would like to know what is wrong with me because I am an American that makes me unfit to submit my own literary property directly to the publisher. Why do I have to live my whole life as someone else’s….someone else’s….someone else’s….

    Sorry, I can’t the word, but I think it starts with “n”, or maybe, somebody else might say, the letter “b”.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  183. Anon[192] • Disclaimer says:
    @A. Clifton

    There was no Talmud during the Old or New Testament.

  184. Anymike says:
    @AceDeuce

    True, but still coffeehouse logic and word games. We need an agenda of we wants. Jobs and academic admission above all.

  185. Anonymous[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @American Bulwark

    Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and tortuous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we call it the word of a demon than the word of God.

    I’m constantly amazed that people can read the Old Testament, which is a history of God’s interaction with the Jewish nation as told by the Jewish nation, and not realize that it catalogs one Jewish failure after another. Apparently, the Jewish nation can’t be trusted with the simplest of tasks. Point to a star and they ignore the star and see God’s finger, every time, and most of the time they worship the finger.

    The Old Testament is clearly a south pointing compass, the story of a people who misbehaved so badly that they ended up by killing God’s son, and then, according to history, committed mass suicide by rebelling against Rome thrice, each time committing horrible crimes and each time being nearly destroyed when they lost (as it was obvious they would lose in each case). The Son of God pretty clearly told the Jewish people just how they could manage to avoid being killed by the Roman Empire. As a last act, the Jewish people ignored and killed the Son of God.

    So how does this make the Jewish People almost unquestionable law givers to Christians, which appears to be the general belief even within the context of contemporary Christian theology? It seems a little strange, rather like having the Russian Mafia assume the duties of the US Supreme Court.

  186. Protogonus says: • Website

    Yes, Mr. Anglin, but what is a Negro? Does he himself understand his own racialism? Why, for example, does he hate himself above all, according to clinical psychologists? Why does he despise mulattoes like Obama? (This phenomenon is the fundamental cause of Haiti’s hell-on-earth!)

    The first writer to unravel the distinctly created basis of Negro attitudes (as “Masters of Vanity”) was an obscure self-taught idealist who lived 500 years ago. (The NAACP ought to look at this.)

    From hence it can be derived precisely how the Negro brain differs from the Asian (“Masters of Pride”) and the Caucasian (“Masters of Greed”). Oh! Each of them is defective as created? Yes! And each of them has the Mark of Cain written on his adult face to prove it!

    With proper formulation of questions about Trifurcated Man, the answers can elevate all three races toward self-understanding and reconstruction from within. Interested? Look here:

    https://www.academia.edu/49131287/Brief_Exposition_on_the_Depth_of_the_Negrid_Face

  187. JR Foley says:

    Good points. Isaiah and others were drawn and quartered—they finally got Christ in exchange for Barabbas and earlier times Moses broke the original 2 commandments —the stone –and headed back up to get another 8 —- and Pontius Pilate “What is truth” and ” I see no fault in this man”——but WHO cried out ” We have NO KING but Caesar!!!” and today the Americans have no KING but Zylenskyy???

    • Thanks: Emslander
  188. @Anymike

    I wrote my book and self published on Amazon because I needed to get it out of my system. I certainly never made enough on it to pay me for the almost one year it took to write. I wrote it and now I’m free of that itch.

    If you want to make money as a book author in today’s world where few read anything, good luck. People in technical fields are forced to read technical books to stay current because videos just aren’t detailed enough in most cases. Everyone else listens to a broadcast or watches a video for entertainment. Older women read what I term slut novels, but I think it takes a woman to write them. For the younger set, reading is like, you know, so last century.

    I’ll admit that the last non technical book I attempted to read was The Camp of the Saints. I’ve started it several times and put it down because the prose never seems to get to the point; too wordy for my taste. Prior to that it was a book by Rupert Sheldrake. I liked his videos on morphic resonance but discovered as an author, he sucks.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  189. Anon[337] • Disclaimer says:
    @Francis Miville

    How does Ireland compare to African countries?

  190. Anymike says:
    @RoatanBill

    I got Camp of the Saints from the regional library system. Even in English, it’s a circuitous French novel. The original is available for free online. The known English translation is not free. I think, frankly, that an abridged version of it that gets to the juicy parts might be in order.

    So much has been written about the novel by now, why bother to read it?

  191. Druid55 says:
    @René Fries

    And you just proved you’re and ignorant MORON!

  192. beau says:
    @Mr Darcy

    it is, indeed, time for a peaceful separation.

  193. @Chris Moore

    Have you read the qur’ân? I have it in German (Goldmann, ISBN 3-442-07904-7). My understanding of the fascistic nature of “islam” (quotation marks) furthermore is based on 5473 pages of the best scientific knowledge currently available, i.e. 8 of the 9 books — the 9th has been ordered — of a series elaborated at the Universität des Saarlandes and called “Inârah” (“enlightenment”), you can get some clues at http://inarah.net/.

    But of course, other narratives as the Islamic or Christian or Jewish or Buddhist or Zoroastrian are possible (and plausible): “Awonawílono (‘the maker and container of all’) transformed himself into Sun and, of its own substance, produced two germs which it impregnated the Great Waters with. From Awitelin Tsíta (‘the Fourfold Containing Mother Earth’) and Apoyan Tächu (‘the All-covering Father Sky’) issued later the Master, Póshaiyank’ya – etcaetera” (Mircea Eliade, Mythes, rêves et mystères, éditions folio/essais Gallimard, Paris 1957, pp. 196-7). So I must concede your narrative on the same footing.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  194. @El Piloto, Air America

    I agree. The time for polite politics is past. Now is the time for preparing for violence and retribution to lay waste to our enemies.

  195. @Avery

    Not exactly.

    Whites in Blue States are fleeing to Red States like Idaho and South Carolina to get away from diversity and live with those Whites they despise. The first exodus was from California to Colorado which they turned red, now it is from all the Pacific Coast states to farther inland and from the Northeast to Florida and other southern states.

  196. The violence of the black US underclass is a tiny blip on the radar compared with the murderous butchery, torture, theft and destruction unleashed on the world in the last 70 years by the Anglo-Saxon MICIMATT complex.

  197. @Anonymous

    Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason, Part II, Chapter III, Conclusion …

    “The most detestable wickedness, the most horrid cruelties, and the greatest miseries, that have afflicted the human race have had their origin in this thing called revelation, or revealed religion. It has been the most dishonourable belief against the character of the divinity, the most destructive to morality, and the peace and happiness of man, that ever was propagated since man began to exist. It is better, far better, that we admitted, if it were possible, a thousand devils to roam at large, and to preach publicly the doctrine of devils, if there were any such, than that we permitted one such impostor and monster as Moses, Joshua, Samuel, and the Bible prophets, to come with the pretended word of God in his mouth, and have credit among us.”

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  198. Druid55 says:
    @Agent76

    A few things wrong but otherwise good

  199. Emslander says:
    @Rooster15

    It’s why the tired old controllers have been trying to suppress thought and commentary for the past seven years. I can’t say Trump was a very good president, but he was a lifted middle finger at the media and the monetized influence whores.

    I agree that the humor is a very good sign. As the Soviet Union lost its hold on the Russian people in the sixties and seventies, some of the funniest stuff ever uttered were Russian jokes at the expense of the rock-headed apparatchiks.

  200. Anon[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    RB

    Thanks very very much for the replies. I read them over and over again. They are well thought out, intelligent and methodical and make a lot of sense.

    I am always aghast at the behaviour of the black man which defies all logic.

    A friend of mine who returned to the Islands told me he had decided to kill anyone who got in his way. He woke up one night in his new island home to find two blacks in his house both of whom he took out with a shotgun. One guys jaw and most of his face ended up on the floor and walls and the other one was shot in the back and almost cut in half. He told me that he mixed up a glass of sorrel drink and had that when the curious crowd gathered and the rumour spread he was drinking blood.

    The police arrived several HOURS later and he had already dragged the bodies into the yard and dumped them there so the blood could run off into the concrete gutters. Like Honduras, the Police did not give a shit as the fellow were well known to them. As a matter of fact the Police were pissed because he had disrupted their routine (dominoes, drinks and chatting with each other and their girlfriends). Since then he has been able to leave his motor bike, boat and assorted goodies unprotected as no one wants to tangle with him.

    Besides he has put out the word that he is a mental case, bipolar, an Obeah practitioner and freaks out for no apparent reason all of which is bullshit. So the word has spread via the mango telegraph that he is a serious individual who walks a thin line between normality and insanity and he has been left alone.

    Blacks seem to understand only violence and respect you when you SHOW your violence is more ultra than anything they themselves can even imagine. These people are a group all onto themselves.

    Anyway Roatan is on my to do list. Once again thanks for the reply !

    • Thanks: Ben the Layabout
  201. Alrenous says: • Website
    @American Bulwark

    Though remember Thomas Paine is exactly the kind of pretender that’s he’s condemning. He says he doesn’t believe in god as a trick to make you think he’s isn’t religious. Atheism is a sect of Christianity.

    • Replies: @American Bulwark
  202. Anon[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @beau

    divide the nation into at least 2, if not more, parts.

    i don’t want to live with those people and collectivists in general any more than they want to live in the same nation with me. give them a land area of their own so their violence is contained within their community and will continue until that community stands up, says ENOUGH and ends the problem itself. anything else is cheap talk leading to expensive bullshit.

    I dont think dividing the nation or continent would solve the problem. After they frig up their area and turn it into a wasteland they will cross the border into White space and the existing problems will be manifest once again.

    What is needed is an island, say in the Pacific where they can all be dumped. There, they can be free to rob and murder each other. All non-white immigration also needs to be terminated. Indians have India, the Chinese have China and Whites will have the US. Few of us want to go live in India, China or Africa. As for the Mexico border jumpers the Jews have already given us the blue print. You get knee capped by a sniper and left in the desert. A few examples as such and a lot of problems will be solved. The caravans will be forced to remain in Mexico whose government, unable to look after them, will kick them the fuck out.

    Fair is fair. They have their own lands and they should stay there.. We dont want them and we dont need them !

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  203. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Mr Darcy

    As if they didn’t end segregation deliberately as part of their pro-crime policy campaign.

    You’re welcome to sit down and do your homework at any time. Until then you will remain hopelessly ignorant, completely at the mercy of your betters.

    Or is that because you’re so weak you will remain at the mercy of your betters regardless of whether you know anything or not? Is that why knowing things is useless for you?

  204. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @René Fries

    Let’s put the ((Jews)) under similar scrutiny, given that their damage is far older, graver, and more enduring than Islam’s. In addition to the Mideast wars, they’re responsible for WW1 and WW2. And that’s just in the last century.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  205. anarchyst says:
    @Chris Mallory

    You must be a Catholic-hating Baptist that takes selected parts of the Bible and ignores the rest. Handle any snakes lately?
    It appears that the Baptist clergy is just as foul as the pedo Catholic priest hierarchy.
    Since Baptist congregations are somewhat autonomous, it will be interesting to see them answer charges of their pedo clergy committing the same acts as the pedo Catholic priests. Will the congregations themselves be responsible for paying their clergy’s victims?
    The Catholic Church recognized the perfidy of the jews until it was hijacked by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.

  206. anarchyst says:
    @Anonymous

    I agree…
    One of Christianity’s biggest mistakes was adopting the Old Testament and making it a part of scripture.
    The Old Testament “god” was a “god of conquest” and demanded total annihilation of its “enemies”, men women, children, livestock, plants–EVERYTHING alive. NOTHING was to be left standing. Jews were told to destroy EVERYTHING in their paths. This sure sounds like GENOCIDE to me.
    Yes, it is very possible that the Old Testament was the “work of satan”. even then, “satan” had to constantly correct his subjects–jews–as they were always misbehaving.
    I cringe when I hear well-meaning people talk about out judeo-Christian heritage.
    Nothing could be further from the truth.
    The god of judaism is a vengeful god, totally unlike the merciful and welcoming God of Christianity.
    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality or social status, not true of judaism.
    Jews DID murder Jesus Christ and TOOK FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DOING SO.
    Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II Ecumenical Council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and murder.
    As is the case, even today, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ.
    How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution? (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way).
    It makes absolutely no sense at all.
    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.
    It is time the Jewish lobbies and the American Government leaders as well as the evangelical Christian leaders who mislead the poor American young into joining the military and believing that they are doing something for God and Christianity by fighting Israel’s wars were named, shamed and arrested and tried for treason.
    In a perverse sort of way, israel’s favorite “war song” is “Onward Christian Soldiers”…
    There…I’ve said it…

    • Agree: Charon
    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @Charles Martel France
  207. Anonymous[324] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    I’m waiting to see what happens by year end to determine if we start up again. When the SHTF, there will be no place unaffected but at least we won’t freeze.

    You might want to consider some contingency planning. If you want to keep legitimacy over your core group (or some subset thereof), you should at the least ensure their food supply. Nothing upsets the troops as much as no food, unless it’s no toilet paper. Tailor the number of people you retain to your resources — probably to just what you can afford to lose if somehow nothing happens.

    For an aid in planning:
    Here’s a worst case but feasible scenario, roughly like the one you outlined but with a few more details and an historical analog. Highest risk of failure are just prior to US elections, 2022/10 and 2024/10.

    [MORE]

    As I understand it, the legal situation back in the US is that all European descended Whites (and now anybody who is Jewish is also White, except maybe the Ethiopian Jews) are a suspect group, as they are guilty of oppression (“discrimination”) until a Federal Court says they aren’t guilty. This is under the 1964 Civil Rights Act as interpreted by the Judicial Branch of the US Federal government. No other group, including the Whites from North Africa, is considered guilty until ruled innocent [1].

    Last night (2022/05/09/08:00 EDT) the Democrats 1/6 committee announced that an entire Branch of government had found that the European descended Whites had attempted to overthrow the US government. While this is not a judicial ruling, it could be claimed that a group presumed to be oppressors was and is still attempting to overthrow the US Federal Government, and that prompt emergency action against this particular clear and present danger is justified. This action could include at least two components:
    1) Destroy the leadership structure of the insurrectionists: Arrest former President Trump and his known supporters, including Senators and Representatives.
    2) Destroy the political base of the insurrectionists: Eliminate the Electoral College and include Puerto Rico and Washington, DC, as States.

    Such a course of action would be, ah, highly destructive, very uncertain of success, and would leave the resulting government, any resulting government, with little national or international legitimacy [2].

    Second “worst case”:
    US withdrawal from Europe. Russia escalates, US has no alternative to using nuclear weapons, and does not. Or, perhaps, US or Russia uses one nuclear weapon. In either event, Europe panics over the perceived danger of Europe’s destruction. US loss of prestige and evident reckless leadership results in a de facto loose confederation between Germany and the Russian Federation, with consequent cascade failures and interruptions in international trade. The flow of goods in the US [3] results in the fall of the current government.

    Third worst case: Combination of case 1 and case 2 through cascade failure.

    Two years ago neither case would have been possible. However, Obama’s style of African politics makes both cases possible [4].

    With any luck, neither case will happen. However, it seems likely that something will [5]. The major urban areas are not being maintained (“Why spend money on sewer system maintenance when you could be spending it on registered voters?”), and are due at some point to become uninhabitable, perhaps after the blackouts predicted for this Summer produce highly destructive riots that soak up enough money to make even vital maintenance/replacement infeasible.

    In that worst case, I’d expect that many parts of the world would be left to their own devices, and their own crops [6].

    ****************************
    1] Christopher Caldwell; The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties; 2020/01/21.
    2] Schlecter, Crisis, 2020/11/19. Potboiler, but the Congress takeover scene was written before the events of 2021/01/06, and could serve as a template for future events. Schecter is a successful lawyer, among other things.
    3] The Mandibles, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mandibles
    4] Compare the career of Mobutu (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlJwDXelMcM) with that of Obama. Same general pattern: get near the center of power, do whatever you need to do at whatever cost to somebody else to get power, then keep it. The re-classification of Jewish organizations as White is the US analog to Mobutu’s killing Lumumba. Also, see Mobutu’s discussion of the office of Bantu “Chief”.
    5] See: Turchin, Ages of Discord; also
    https://peterturchin.com/age-of-discord/ and https://peterturchin.com/
    6] During WW II, Bengal, in India, had a famine (partly due to refugees from Burma’s conquest by Imperial Japan), that in 1930, would have been ended by shipped in food. However, the war effort made that and other measures impossible, and much of Bengal’s population starved (2 to 4 million Bengalis starved to death; the exact number cannot be determined). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  208. @Mefobills

    > think you can talk sense into a lolberg boomer

    You said it yourself, his “hardness” is solely from the words spread by his low IQ black employees, whose reason for not ganging up on the plump huwhite man is most likely sentimental/social. I bet he doesn’t act all lolberg around his employees either, lets them see him as some sick, perverted, anti-social foreign devils.

    He also talked about how he, as a dictator, would provide firearm courses free of charge to all citizens. I wonder how this would be funded in a lolberturdian “society”.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  209. @Anonymous

    One of my businesses was food related. We already have enough to last us well over a year. My wife wants to use up an \$800 credit we have with a wholesale food distributor in the US, so we’ll get some more soon. We have enough toilet paper and other paper, foil, plastic bags, soap, detergent, etc for years, since it was intended to be used up for customers that disappeared due to lockdown.

    My operating thesis is that the dollar has a better than even chance of seriously degrading, if not collapsing, by year end. Fed machinations will continue till something breaks and then it’s back to QE and roaring inflation. The next shock will cause a serious loss of confidence in the Dollar and then foreigners will commence dumping for real thinking they need to get out before everyone else; that last snowflake causes the avalanche.

    If Putin doesn’t push to destroy NATO, then he’s an idiot. Now is the time to attack outside of Ukraine to show the Europeans that their NATO is a mirage of security, while continuing to supply them with fuel and soon, food. Destroying US assets illegally occupying Syria would be a good start. Shooting down Israeli planes would reverberate in DC. Leaving Europe alone sends a signal to the population to regime change their political fools.

    At some point, the Europeans will switch allegiance and throw the US out of Europe since US policies are destined to destroy their economies with the full cooperation of Brussels. The Euro will crash soon since their banks are leveraged far worse than US banks and the blowback in sanctions is hammering their economies.

    Things that cannot go on forever have a tendency to stop.
    Herbert Stein

    • Agree: René Fries
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Anonymous
  210. c matt says:

    “That was a horrible, divisive, racist thing for him to say”

    “But was he wrong?”

    “….”

    • Thanks: Ben the Layabout
  211. @RoatanBill

    If Putin doesn’t push to destroy NATO, then he’s an idiot.

    You are still repeating his NATO excuse? The one that never made sense? Ukraine never applied nor qualified for NATO and Russia never game them any type of ultimatum regarding neutrality.

    Anyways I guess you didn’t read today’s news.

    Putin compares himself to Peter the Great and admits that the war is about taking territory
    https://nypost.com/2022/06/10/vladimir-putin-compares-himself-to-peter-the-great/

    Well that is what you get for trusting the word of a half pint dictator that originally claimed the war would never happen and that it was all just a training exercise on the border.

    Shooting down Israeli planes would reverberate in DC.

    Why would he shoot down Israeli planes? He sells Israel their oil because the Arabs won’t do it. Do I need to post pictures of his trips to Israel again? Do you just live under some bizarre delusion where Putin is going to stick it to the Jews? He has sent in Muslims to kill Orthodox Christians. All he cares about are his dictator games and will happily sell Israel its oil to fund them.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  212. @John Johnson

    You and I have crossed swords several times and you’ve never come out ahead. Your shallow thinking and your propensity to make shit up and build elaborate straw men is a consistent characteristic that eventually bites you in the ass. Why not wise up?

    You are still repeating his NATO excuse? The one that never made sense? Ukraine never applied nor qualified for NATO and Russia never game them any type of ultimatum regarding neutrality.

    I never claimed that, and it has nothing to do with the comment I made; more making shit up on your part.

    Putin needs to get rid of NATO because it is a bullshit organization that forever wants to further encroach on territory alongside Russia to sell inferior weapons systems while maligning Russia as a sales strategy. Getting rid of NATO effectively also gets rid of the US in Europe so that Putin can continue trading with a reformed Europe after the EU fails and the dolts in their various gov’ts get regime changed by their populations once winter hits. It’s a longer term strategy that you probably can’t comprehend.

    I’m not going to bother reading the Post article as it’s a tabloid rag with no credibility.

    Why would he shoot down Israeli planes?

    Maybe because he’s getting tired of their interference in Syria and threatening Russia’s partner, Iran. From an Israeli source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/354706

    Putin is selling energy to Europe while Europe’s faux “leaders” are sanctioning Russia. Putin is an astute businessman. He is making a fortune on the sanctions, so why should he stop. As for selling oil to Israel, it’s a business deal till such time that Russia wants to weaken Israel. In the interim, money is money.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  213. @Alrenous

    Paine was a Deist not an Atheist.

  214. Well as a “Black ” Man, I’m going to have to agree with the statement about Black People being the problem but i really don’t know how to fix it. I’m 63 years old and have always wondered about my People (as someone called us Bantu from Africa). I mean, you can’t round us all up and send us back to Africa because I for one have no desire to go to Africa because America is my home, and you can’t just kill all of ua or put us back into slavery or give us some remote corner of America to call our own country (It would be destroyed in a month). I really don’t know what can be done about the Black man in America. I just live my life as righteously as the bible calls for and treat people with respect and kindness but “Bantu” people are not know for living like that. WHAT DO WE DO about this issue.

    I do read some ugly stuff in the comments but that’s what’s expected, I figured White people would get fed up eventually, and I don’t blame you.

  215. @Rod T Factor

    Rod – I am not black and, whereas, I understand the racial component to plenty of crime today don’t let some of the extremists on here make you believe they represent the views of most white or non-black people. They don’t.

    There are individuals and gangs of whites, Hispanics and Asians and others who commit plenty of serious crimes too. I’m not going to dicker over percentages.

    The bottom line is the issue of CRIME. It doesn’t matter the color of skin of who commits them. What matters is that solid deterrents are in place, that criminals be caught and seriously punished. All of that must be followed-through upon.

    But, that’s where much of the problem is now. There have been many radical, stealth-operator DA’s installed around the country. They are a huge issue as they ARE NOT working for the USA, they are abiding by what those who installed them want. Which is nothing less than to destroy this country. There are also installed, bought or blackmailed police chiefs, judges, governors, AGs and more.

    We are triangulated, Rod, and IT IS a fvcking problem! The more people focus on the skin colors of anyone, the more they are not seeing the real picture of nationwide legal corruption that (intentionally) prevents this from improving.

    • Agree: Ben the Layabout
  216. Black, white, green or purple, it’s all just Amerikastani on Amerikastani violence to me. I lost all sympathy for Amerikastani blacks long ago. They’re no different from the rest of you.

  217. Anonymous[655] • Disclaimer says:

    The solution is simpler than you’d think: make it illegal for blacks to own a weapon, make it 15-year jail time with no parole for possession.

  218. @Anon

    Indians have India, the Chinese have China and Whites will have the US.

    An excellent plan….except one minor point that needs to be changed. Whites have Europe. Everybody goes back to their lands of origin. Now that’s a better plan.

    • Thanks: Deep Thought
    • Replies: @Anymike
  219. Anonymous[421] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rod T Factor

    Good summary, and one I’ve had in mind for some time.

    The present US system has, IMHO, transitioned.

    It was formerly from one controlled by the Jewish coalition (after the obvious and quite public fight of the 1960s that featured Jewish coalition elements physically assaulting the Democrat National Convention, a nation wide bombing campaign (https://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/27/1969-a-year-of-bombings/), and a dead President. All of which stopped after the Jewish coalition dominated US politics.

    However, it is now controlled by former President Obama. The key historical marker was loss of control over national propaganda by the Jewish Coalition, effective earlier this year. The condition of the US since Pres. Biden took over is strictly African in its style — take charge, do what you want, destroy any opposition so there won’t be anyone to criticize. Eventually get taken down when the leader gets old and sick.

    What’s my point? Well, the course of events isn’t up to you or to me, or even to the writers and commenters that haunt https://www.unz.com. Not even to Mr. Unz himself. Although his maintenance of this web site is a minor miracle, Mr. Unz can’t work the major miracle needed to turn the US around. Nobody can.

    The wheels have come off. We’re not in a steerable car now, we’re in a nation side toboggan. I don’t know what will happen, just what has. The most that can be said is that we are entering a social singularity, and, although none of the people going into that singularity will be very happy with what comes out of it, the winners will start referring to the 2020s as “those fortunate events that led to our present dominance.”

    Sorry I can’t be more comforting, but I don’t believe that painting a rosy picture will help just now.

  220. Anonymous[421] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    You’re in good shape that way.

    What I’ve done is considered the problem of home invasion. Home invasions are usually well organized, and consist of one or two cars, a driver for each car, and an assault element, from three to six people. They use the usual methods of surprise and shock: zero dark hundred assault, get the front door open (breacher shot of powdered lead from a shotgun will do that), spread out through the house at a dead run, shoot the beds and anything live that isn’t in the assault element.

    To stop that, you need to delay the assault enough to get yourself up and organized; you need some covered area you can defend in a low intensity firefight, and you might also need to have a reaction force on call.

    Would you ever have to do this? Well, home invasions were fairly common in California back in 2020. I haven’t bothered to see what they are like now. Usually they were Black assaults on Asians, who tended to avoid banks back then. The failed Black assaults shown on YouTube tended to become routes when the defenders started shooting, but if the stakes are high enough I’d expect more determined assaults.

    How to stop this? Layered defenses to delay the assault, alarms when breaching attempts occur, cameras to let you detect the false alarms, a “safe room” with at least enough cover to stop rifle rounds and give you a place to return fire.

    Or, you could just put in a few layers of defense and post a sentry.

    Note that if there is no relief force, then the home invaders can just wait you out, set fire to the house, and so on.

    And that’s the source of the advice to retain your retainers, as it were. The ability of Turchin to predict the early 2020s accurately a decade in advance has me a bit worried [1]. Another analyst has pointed out that the death rate in these cultural reorganizations has been increasing for a few hundred years (perhaps because of increasing world population), and if trends hold than this time around deaths might go to about 2 billion people. In such a monumental screwup, it would make sense to consider home invasion as possible, and it might make sense to try to live through it as part of a group, preferably a group that you led or that needs your services, possibly your services in holding down a logistics base of operations.

    Or, it might not. The above is just an attempt at either planning or panic, I’m not quite sure which.

    *******************

    1] The classic story of successful trend analysis is this one: http://www.weylmann.com/The_Year_of_the_Jackpot.pdf

  221. @Chris Moore

    Let’s put the Jews under similar scrutiny

    why not? The “Inârah” series are giving serious insight in the religions Islam has drawn from (Judaism, Christianism, Zoroastrism, Buddhism essentially), thereby providing some info that may come as a surprise, not only to Jews: “in der Bibelwissenschaft besteht ein Konsens darüber, dass es Abraham nicht gegeben hat // in the ‘Bibelwissenschaft’ there is a consensus that Abraham did not exist”, in: Der frühe Islam, Verlag Hans Schiler, Berlin 2007, p. 310, and “(…) konstitutive religiöse Neuanfänge und Zäsuren werden oft mit Erzählungen über ihre Begründer verbunden, seien sie gänzlich fiktiv wie bei Laotse, den biblischen Patriarchen oder Mose, oder (usw.) // constitutive religious new beginnings and caesura often are linked with stories about their founders, be they entirely fictitious as in the case of Laotse, the Biblical patriarchs or Moses (etc)”, ibid. p. 346.

  222. @anarchyst

    anarchyst says:

    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.

    You do not know Mohammed , Islam and the pervert muslims very well. Read and get informed to save yourself from perversion and lies. Islam doesn’t honour and respect Christians.Muslims insult Christians every time they get an opportunity to do so in their mosques , through satellite television channels and on the internet.

    https://www.meforum.org/6554/muhammad-and-the-virgin-mary

    At a time when non-Muslims are constantly warned to speak respectfully of Muhammad, or else offended Muslims might respond with violence—to the shame and blame of those who exercise their freedom of expression—consider what Muslims regularly say about the things non-Muslims hold dear.

    Recently during his televised Arabic-language program, Dr. Salem Abdul Galil—previously deputy minister of Egypt’s religious endowments for preaching—gleefully declared that, among other biblical women (Moses’ sister and Pharaoh’s wife), “our prophet Muhammad—prayers and peace be upon him—will be married to (the Virgin) Mary in paradise.”

    (Note: the Arabic word for “marriage” denotes “legal sexual relations” and is devoid of Western, “romantic,” or Platonic connotations.)

    According to an Islamic hadith, Muhammad declared, “Allah will wed me in paradise to Mary.”

    Where did Galil—this governmental official who also holds that Muslims can wear the hated crucifix to deceive Christians—get this idea?

    As usual, from Muhammad himself. In a hadith that was deemed reliable enough to be included in the renowned Ibn Kathir’s corpus, Muhammad declared that “Allah will wed me in paradise to Mary, Daughter of Imran”[1] (whom Muslims identify with Jesus’ mother).

    If few Christians today know about this Islamic claim, medieval Christians living in Muslim-occupied nations were aware of it.

    Thus, Eulogius of Cordoba, an indigenous Christian of Muslim-occupied Spain, once wrote, “I will not repeat the sacrilege which that impure dog [Muhammad] dared proffer about the Blessed Virgin, Queen of the World, holy mother of our venerable Lord and Savior. He claimed that in the next world he would deflower her.”

  223. @A B Coreopsis

    Agree. But remember Mendelssohn and Mahler. Both very great favorites of mine – only Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, Monteverdi, Berlioz and Chopin can compete.

  224. Mefobills says:
    @HeebHunter

    > think you can talk sense into a lolberg boomer

    No.

    They have to be put in concentration camps. That or they have to die off.

    You can explain things to them all day, but they are immune from logic. Their brains are calcified.

    HITLER WAS RIGHT!

    (OK, he screwed up on a few things, but consider he did not receive training, and used instinct.)

  225. @Agent76

    Curious. I thought GA was an open carry state. My data is from 40 years ago. I was stationed at Ft. Gordon, GA. Off post, I was playing a video game (it WAS the 1980s, after all!!!) in some store and a Negro next to me was playing a pinball machine and left his handgun on top of the the machine. I was momentarily freaked out, but quickly recovered. I figured if he was playing a game he was not intent upon any mischief. Still, it’s weird the first time one experiences it.

  226. @EliteCommInc.

    Your argument is laughable on its face. Consult some more statistics Einstein. I already made a case (with linked article) that Blacks commit about 75% of the homicides in the USA. For violent crimes, there too they are by far the biggest “producer” of this dubious service. Numbers vary, but their overall violent crime rate is probably ten times that of Whites. The convicted felon rate is not quite 7x that of whites, if I recall correctly. About ten percent of ALL black males are currently in jail or prison. Estimates vary, but between 25% and 33% of black males (not sure if all ages, or just the peak criming years, roughly 14-39) are already convicted felons.

    Black males are so self-destructive that Black women actually face a shortage of potential mates. Too many males are dead or in prison (or, dare I add, dating White girls). Such imbalances are usually only seen in a society after a major war has claimed men, as was seen in the Soviet Union after WW II.

    If your Chicago calculation is correct, I will concede that the vast majority of citizens are not killing offers some relief, until you realize that 2% are. That’s not very reassuring.

    “Racist?” You’re damned right it’s racist. Racism at bottom is the claim (“without proof” says my PC dictionary from 1990s) that one race is better than another. Well, friend, there are plenty of statistics for crime and many other pertinent data that consistently show that there are significant, predictable differences between the races.

    Is the nation or its laws racist to some degree? No doubt it is. Especially in legacy laws. Long ago the problems of Blacks were recognized and laws written with the intent to restrict them, to minimize harm to Whites and (perhaps) to try and help the Blacks too. Once legal changes gutted most of those laws and proclaimed “equality under the law,” a bigger problem cropped up. In the first place, no large group of human beings is of equal attributes. The differences are even more glaring between races (see below).

    So by all means call Masters (or me) “racist” if you like. It’s a badge I will wear with pride, and I’ve got the data to back me up. In contrast, those who call themself “Egalitarian” or a synomym with the assumption that all men are equal, has a very tough proof ahead of him, assuming he can ever get past the empty rhetoric and name-calling phase, which is damned rare when dealing with a Leftist/Liberal.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  227. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Ben the Layabout

    Egalitarianism is Satanism. The elite commie wants to cause as much suffering as possible.

    Reminder that Bantu-American criminals primarily victimize other Bantu. They themselves suffer the brunt of the problem, especially the poor. Elite commie, like all egalitarians, is viciously racist in the true sense: sadistic spite directed along racial lines. He/she/it defends the anti-Bantu pro-crime laws precisely because, as far as elite commie is concerned, they’re working as intended.

    Not to suggest elite commie doesn’t hate deprecated-Americans as well. After all, he/she/it is also classist. Rake the proles.

  228. @Rod T Factor

    Thank you for your candid and sincere comment. I am not trying to infer anything, but am genuinely interested in the roots of the issue. I am very interested to hear from your point of view as a Black man.

    Why do you think that Black people are over represented in gun violence …ie. do you think it stems from genetic inheritance? Or is it to do with African American culture / collective perception?

    I must tell you that I have met many African Americans in my travels to the US, and I have had the fortune only to meet lovely Black people. Perhaps my sampling is somehow skewed, but my own countrymen have returned with similar observations, so it cannot be my fluke shot.

  229. …but am genuinely interested in the roots of the issue.

    I don’t know if this very long article helps. The link is no longer active:

    [MORE]

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/06/19/obama-s-former-spiritual-advisor-joshua-dubois-on-the-fight-for-black-men.html

    The Fight for Black Men

    There are more African-Americans on probation, parole, or in prison today than were slaves in 1850. It is not a crisis of crime. It is a crisis of people being left behind.

    By Joshua DuBois

    There is an easy way to meet Joe Jones, and a hard way. Let’s start with the easy way. If you and I were at a cocktail party, I’d introduce you to a tall, bald, black man, standing a shoulder above most everybody else. Knowing Joe Jones, he’d probably be wearing a tan suit and muted tie. Joe’s subdued, square-rimmed glasses fit nicely with his veiled intellect—he’s the kind of guy who readily drops six-dollar words without a hint of pretense.

    I’d probably ask Joe to tell you about the nonprofit he runs, the Center for Urban Families on Baltimore’s West Side. CFUF is a national model for helping men and women who are confronting addiction, poverty, and despair turn their lives around, and teaching absent fathers how to reconnect with their kids. Joe’s a modest guy, so I’d have to brag on his behalf, about the bigwigs who have dropped by his center, and all the awards the organization has won.

    Finally, I’d say in passing: “You know, Joe has a powerful personal story himself. His own father wasn’t around, he struggled in the streets for a while, and then pulled himself up, and made it out.” Nice and neat. Joe would nod and smile. You’d nod and smile. I’d nod and smile. We’d all be smiling—appropriately inspired.

    VimeoJoe Jones recalls the day his father walked out on his family.

    That’s the easy way to meet Joe Jones. But there’s also the hard way. The hard way is to grapple with the fact that Joe’s family didn’t just emerge from some unseen ghetto thousands of miles away. No, his grandfather migrated to Baltimore from North Carolina, and started a business—a waste-management facility, one of the city’s more successful ones. His grandparents were “models of stability,” Joe told me. A few generations before that, Joe’s family were slaves.

    It’s hard to figure out what happened to Joe’s dad, and thousands of other black fathers like him. Joe’s dad was training to be a teacher, but one day in the mid-’60s he hopped into the driver side of a Ford Thunderbird, visibly angry, slung his duffel bag on the passenger side, and drove off for good. Joe saw the whole thing from his upstairs window in the Lafayette Court housing projects; he thought his dad was going to the laundromat, and sat waiting for him, for hours.

    After falling into addiction, Joe Jones turned his life around—and helps others to do the same.

    It’s tough to stomach what happened later. How Joe, an adorable kid of 13—never a smoker, never a drinker—met a guy a couple years older than him. And this person put it into Joe’s young head that maybe it wouldn’t be a bad thing to stick a needle in his arm, and let a bit of heroin rush in. So, as a 13-year-old, he did. Joe’s two cousins shared the needle with him—their dad wasn’t around either—and his best friend, Barry, also fatherless, did too.

    So now Joe’s an adolescent junkie, hanging out on Edmonson Avenue in West Baltimore and shooting up wherever he can find a shadow long enough to hide himself: sometimes in a bowling alley bathroom, sometimes in his aunt’s basement. He was 14 when he was busted for the first time for using drugs, along with his two cousins and Barry. The other boys’ parents bailed them out, thank God, but the police suggested that Joe, the ringleader, should stew for a little while to learn his lesson—you know, “tough on crime.”

    Turns out, this wasn’t the best move for Joe. During his few extra days in jail, in the throes of heroin withdrawal that his young system wasn’t handling well, Joe met a local kingpin who taught him how to be a more efficient junkie, and a more effective criminal. Or as Joe puts it now (in his always-impeccable phrasing): “This man created a pathway for me to negotiate the street environment in a way that I hadn’t anticipated. It was the worst thing that could’ve happened to me.”

    “The Negro in America” series won Newsweek a National Magazine Award in 1968. Newsweek recycled its 1966 cover line “Black and White” in 2007 for Obama’s fifth appearance on the cover.

    So in the span of a few years, Joe went from a stable household to a single-parent family. From a middle-school honor student to a street-corner addict. From the grandson of a businessman and great-great-great-grandson of slaves to the son of an absent father, and a future deadbeat dad himself. It was a jumble of inputs—bad parenting and bad policy, misguided culture and tragic history—resulting in one clear output: a woefully lost kid.

    There is a lot more to Joe Jones’s story—more pain than most can bear; more beauty than you’d expect. We’ll get to all of that, including his fateful encounter with the president of the United States.

    But first, a few words about the world Joe comes from: the world of low-income black men. Why talk about this world? After all, it’s simple enough to ignore. We can safely tuck these men away in our inner cities and allow them to interact largely among themselves. We can rush past them in front of the gas station, murmur silently when the nightly news tells us of a shooting across town, or smile when we meet a nice, inspiring man like Joe. We can keep them in these places. It’s safe and easy for us.

    Yet if we’re honest, we’ll have to admit that when one single group of people is conspicuously left behind, it never bodes well for society as a whole. In many ways, black men in America are a walking gut check; we learn from them a lot about ourselves, how far we’ve really come as a country, and how much further we have to go.

    I spent the past few months talking to dozens of experts who are working to address the crisis among black men. It was clear from these conversations that the reasons for this crisis are complex—as are the solutions. But it was also clear that the fight for black men, which is currently being waged by activists, politicians, celebrities, and everyday people alike, can indeed be won.

    As with Joe Jones, it starts by understanding their history, and their stories.

    DuBois Black MenFrom left: Christopher Gregory/The New York Times/Redux,Walter McBride/WM Photography,Terrence Jennings/Picturegroup/AP,Chester Higgins Jr/The New York Times/Redux30 LEADERS IN THE FIGHT FOR BLACK MEN: Click the image to see author Joshua DuBois’s list of activists, politicians, and writers who are working to change the future for African-American men.

    THE EARLIEST chapter in that story is a tough one. I’d rather skip it. You’d rather that I skip it. But as Ralph Ellison once remarked, channeling Faulkner, our complicated racial past is “a part of the living present”; it’s a past that “speaks even when no one wills to listen.”

    The facts are a bit overwhelming, but not in much dispute. Africans were imported to the United States as purchased goods beginning around 1620. By 1770, when Crispus Attucks, a free black man, spilled the first drop of blood in the cause of the American Revolution, nearly 18 percent of the American population—almost 700,000 people—were slaves. By the time of the Emancipation Proclamation, that number had exploded to over 4 million.

    Beneath these sterile facts lay a grisly reality. Blacks were systemically dehumanized for hundreds of years, a practice that had unique social and psychological effects on men. They were worked and whipped in fields like cattle. Any semblance of pride, any cry for justice, any measure of genuine manhood was tortured, beaten, or sold out of them. Marriage was strictly prohibited. Most were forbidden from learning to read and write. The wealth derived from their labor—the massive wealth derived from cotton, our chief export throughout much of the 19th and early 20th centuries—was channeled elsewhere.

    But, because slavery ended 150 years ago, we often assume that this dehumanization is ancient history. It is not. As Douglas Blackmon of The Wall Street Journal meticulously documents in his Pulitzer Prize–winning book, Slavery by Another Name, blacks were kept in virtual bondage through Jim Crow laws, sharecropping, and, quite often, a form of quasi-slavery called peonage, which endured well into the middle of the 20th century.

    Here’s how it worked: black men (it was usually men) were arrested for petty crimes or no crimes at all; “selling cotton after sunset” was a favorite charge. They were then assessed a steep fine. If they could not pay, they were imprisoned for long sentences and forced to work for free. This allowed savvy industrialists to replace thousands of slaves with thousands of convicts.

    ‘Black men are the most incarcerated people on the planet … warehoused in prison for nonviolent crimes.’

    While some whites were caught up in this system, the forced labor camps were 80 to 90 percent populated by black men. This practice endured until 1948, when the federal criminal code was rewritten to helpfully clarify that the law forbade involuntary servitude.

    Around that time, determined activists—from the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. to Fannie Lou Hamer—organized to demand equal treatment. We know the civil rights story well: Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, which overturned the separate-but-equal doctrine; the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed various forms of discrimination; and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which carved a clear path to the unfettered right to vote.

    And that, we told black men, was that. Immediately following the civil rights movement, in the early 1970s, we assured these men, with fingers perhaps gently crossed behind our backs, that all the discrimination they had faced was behind them; that there would be no further barriers to opportunity, even unspoken ones; that it was time for them to wake up. Get a job. Get married, and start a family. Build wealth. Take hold of the American dream. We won’t stop you—we promise.

    We focused our social investments in this period—our brief War on Poverty—on women and children, because men were supposed to figure it out. But in the 1970s and 1980s, many of these black men didn’t. Just like their great-grandfathers never fully figured out how to teach their sons about manhood while being lashed in a field. Just like their grandfathers never completely figured out how to pass on lessons about building wealth when theirs was stolen through peonage and sharecropping.

    Their fathers tried to rally around Martin Luther King as a symbol of what they could be—but he was gunned down on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel. In the post–civil rights era, many of these black men, men like Joe Jones’s father, weren’t quite figuring it out either. And neither are many of their sons and grandsons, those bright if often scowling men we see on our streets.

    Dubois-fe0123-BlackMen-embed3

    Eduardo Martinez/ReutersThe NYPD made arrests at protests for 16-year-old Kiki Gray, who was killed by police bullets.

    Why not? The reasons are as complicated as the difficult history, and simple debates about government spending versus personal responsibility are woefully insufficient.

    But one of the key reasons has to do with our criminal justice system. And it points the way toward one of the key solutions—perhaps the single most important thing government can do to help win the fight for black men.

    No one has done more to shed light on this issue than Michelle Alexander. Alexander may be this century’s Harriet Beecher Stowe, the storied author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin about whom President Lincoln remarked, “So you’re the little woman who wrote the book that made this Great War?” But instead of making a war, Alexander wrote a book to end one.

    Alexander was a young civil rights attorney working for the ACLU of California and trying to find a model plaintiff for a civil rights case against the Oakland Police Department, which at the time was rife with corruption. One day, a 19-year-old black man walked into her office, and he looked like the perfect case to prove that the Oakland PD had gone bad.

    The man had been stopped and released dozens of times, for no reason at all. He had been forced to lie on the ground spread-eagle and been subjected to invasive searches, after which the police found nothing. And, important, he had taken meticulous notes of all this—every stop, every date, every badge number. “I was getting more and more excited,” Alexander told me, “because I thought this was our plaintiff.”

    However, at the end of his presentation, the man shared one final fact: he had a felony record, having been busted for a drug offense years earlier and convicted as an adult. Alexander stopped him there. “I explained to him that I couldn’t take his case,” she told me. “It wouldn’t be fair to him or to us. With his felony record he’d have no credibility on the witness stand; he’d be cross-examined about his past.”
    Alexander realized that the “war on drugs” had created what she calls a “permanent under-caste” of men convicted of drug offenses.

    Alexander tried to explain to the young man that it wouldn’t work out, but he pushed back in protest. He said that the conviction was for a minor offense, and that he’d just taken a plea deal to avoid more jail time. He said his past should have no bearing on the repeated abuse he had experienced.

    But Alexander didn’t budge, and eventually the young man had enough. Fighting back tears, he yelled at her, “You’re no better than anyone else! The minute I tell you I have a criminal record, you stop listening. I can’t get a job. I can’t feed my family. Where am I supposed to sleep? How long am I supposed to pay for my record?”

    The man stormed out in a huff, leaving Alexander stunned. At that point, something clicked with her, something that pulled together all of her prior experience in civil rights law and history. Alexander realized that, not unlike the peonage system in the early 20th century, the “war on drugs” had created what she calls a “permanent under-caste” of men convicted of drug offenses. Men who, even after their release from incarceration for relatively minor crimes, would never again be able to navigate the world on equal footing with the rest of us. Men like the young man she met but could not serve.

    Morgan Norman/Gallery StockThe United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world.

    The full explanation of this permanent under-caste of black men and the devastation it has wrought is meticulously and powerfully delivered in The New Jim Crow—Alexander’s book about the war on drugs, which was on The New York Times bestseller list for nearly a year and today can be found in the hands of decision makers across the country, from federal courtrooms to the halls of Congress. In the book, she describes the ramp-up of criminal-justice spending in the 1980s as the result of an intentional political strategy rather than a reasoned law enforcement response. The result has been the mass incarceration of African-Americans, mostly men, with little connection to actual rates of crime.

    Alexander shows that there are more African-Americans in the corrections system today—in prison or on probation or parole—than there were enslaved in 1850. As of 2004, more black men were denied the right to vote because of a criminal record than in 1870, when the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified, giving blacks the right to vote. In the three decades since the war on drugs began, the U.S. prison population has exploded from 300,000 to more than 2 million people, giving our country the highest incarceration rate in the world—higher than Russia, China, and other regimes we consider repressive. A significant majority of black men in some urban areas are labeled felons for life; in and around Chicago, when you include prisoners, that number approaches 80 percent.

    But isn’t this just a function of more crime in black communities? Aren’t we arresting violent super-predators, the type we see on television? Alexander makes clear: in most communities, the answer is no.

    ‘We’re in the best of times and worst of times, at the same time,’ says the Rev. Al Sharpton.

    “It has nothing to do with crime rates,” she told me. “Crime rates have fluctuated over time—we’re currently at historic lows—but incarceration rates have consistently soared.” People of color are arrested in large numbers for relatively minor offenses—four out of five drug arrests in 2005 were for possession, not sales—and then given sentences that outpace their white counterparts. In fact, in the 1990s, when the war on drugs was at its peak, almost 80 percent of the increase in drug arrests was for possession of marijuana.

    The result of all of this is the “under-caste,” an apt if cringe-worthy term describing the massive numbers of black men who cannot access housing, who are screened out of employment, and who in many states are denied the right to vote. Facing severely limited options and few opportunities for rehabilitation, millions of these men re-offend, creating more victims in our communities and landing themselves back in jail.

    These men are increasingly isolated from the rest of America—including from middle-class African-Americans. As the Rev. Al Sharpton, the nationally known civil rights activist and founder of the National Action Network, told me in an interview, “We’re in the best of times and worst of times, at the same time.” “It’s the best-time times,” Sharpton continued, “because we have a black president, black attorney general, black CEOs. But it’s the worst of times because millions of African-American men are being locked up and left out like never before.”

    Dubois-fe0123-BlackMen-embed5.jpgAlex Wong/GettyJob training, instead of mass incarceration, would undoubtedly benefit urban communities.

    Ben Jealous, the president of the NAACP, agrees. In an interview, Jealous declared to me that “black men are the most incarcerated people on the planet … warehoused in prison for nonviolent crimes that two decades ago would have resulted in little to no jail time.”

    But Jealous is also hopeful. The NAACP is going state by state, attaching practical solutions to Alexander’s thesis. And because of strained prison budgets and concern about bloated government, they are finding receptive audiences not just among liberals but among conservatives too. For example, they are presently working with Gov. Nathan Deal of Georgia, a Tea Party Republican, to, in Jealous’s words, “make their prison system dramatically smaller.” “Our allies on the right are beginning to think about criminal-justice reform,” Jealous says. “They are finally getting beyond ‘tough on crime’ slogans, and actually focusing on what works.”

    In fact, bipartisan efforts on criminal-justice reform are growing. On the Democratic side, Attorney General Eric Holder has confronted the issue head on, spearheading an initiative to tackle youth violence and create new reentry programs for returning offenders, while working with Congress to reduce racial disparities in sentencing. He’s been joined on the right by Republican Congressman Frank Wolf, who has taken a particular interest in “smart on crime” approaches, driven by his relationship with Prison Fellowship, an evangelical Christian organization that believes in giving second chances to people who’ve been incarcerated.

    Dubois-fe0123-BlackMen-embed7Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post/GettyDaughters of incarcerated fathers were invited to a Date With Dad event at the Richmond City Jail.

    Meanwhile, from the halls of Congress to statehouses across the country, people are reading Michelle Alexander’s book. On a recent afternoon, I drove to the office of U.S. Congressman Bobby Rush, sitting for an hour with this stalwart of the Congressional Black Caucus whose experience on the issue of black men in America spans from a stint in the Black Panther party to Christian pulpits to losing his own son to gun violence. Rush recently had a spat with a fellow Illinoisan, Republican Sen. Mark Kirk, who made headlines recommending that Chicago spend \$30 million more to lock up young gang members. “I sent him a copy of The New Jim Crow,” Rush told me. “He promised me that he would read it.”

    IF MICHELLE Alexander is worried about black men’s criminal records, John Hope Bryant is concerned with their wallets. “I believe that 99 percent of black leaders are digging in the wrong hole,” Bryant told me. “If you’re poor, your health care’s going to suck, your housing is going to suck, your infrastructure is going to suck … if you’re poor, everything sucks.”

    Bryant speaks like Martin Luther King on an auctioneer’s stand—a frenetic ball of energy and ideas, seamlessly mixing civil rights maxims with financial advice at 100 miles an hour. He started his first business in Compton, California, at the age of 10, when the corner store in his neighborhood stopped selling the type of candy kids wanted. He opened up his own store in his mother’s living room, and in three months was so successful that, in his words, “I put the corner store out of business.”

    Since then, Bryant has been convinced that the way out for black men is through a burgeoning bank account, not a social service program. “The whole world pivots on economic issues. If you don’t solve that, you can’t solve anything else,” Bryant says. “But if you do solve that, you have a chance at solving everything else.”

    Bryant has put his money—and substantial energy—where his mouth is. He runs the largest network of financial literacy centers in the country—HOPE Financial Dignity Centers—which help low-income Americans access credit for small businesses, manage their budgets, open bank accounts, and purchase homes.

    VimeoFinancial literacy is the new civil rights issue, Hope says.

    Like Michelle Alexander and others, Bryant is concerned with the mass incarceration of young black men but from a slightly different angle. “There’s a very good chance that we’re actually locking up the only potential we’ve got to revitalize inner-city neighborhoods in America,” Bryant told me. “Drug dealers, gang organizers—they’re all natural entrepreneurs. They get up early, they work late, they hustle—but they have misplaced values and terrible role models.”

    Bryant created the HOPE Business in a Box program to help troubled youth start, fund, and operate small businesses. He also thinks that black businessmen should help young black boys ditch the “rappers and ball players” that they currently hold up as role models, and look in a different direction for examples of success. “These young men are the best chance we have to create jobs and GDP in our neighborhoods,” Bryant says, “if we can just get them back on the right track.”

    BRYANT’S EFFORT is just one of a growing number of innovative private and public programs that are making real inroads on this issue. Many of these initiatives are taking place under the umbrella of George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, which has created a Campaign for Black Male Achievement and a Leadership and Sustainability Institute to knit together previously disparate programs for black men and boys, and help the field outlast funding from any one source. The effort is led by Shawn Dove, a burly man who speaks with a thick New York accent that has hints of all five boroughs at once. In fact, he’s lived in all of them, but he cut his teeth mostly at 80th Street and Amsterdam Avenue.

    It was on that corner that Dove sold loose joints as a teenager, teetering between a strict Jamaican household, where his single mother ruled with an iron fist, and the warm glow of New York evenings and the allure that hustling brings.

    One day some friends invited Shawn to a basketball game on the Upper West Side, and he met a guy named John Simon, who ran a youth program called DOME (Developing Opportunities for Meaningful Education). Simon told Shawn that he had the potential for greatness if he would only focus. “I took him up on his offer,” Shawn told me.

    The Young Men’s Initiative is about building a ‘continuum of services,’ including job training, mentoring, and male-friendly health care.

    From there it was a fast track to Wesleyan University, a stint in the garment industry, and a career as a shining star among nonprofit executives in New York. But several years ago, Shawn received a call that would change his life.

    It was from the Open Society Institute—now Open Society Foundations. They were looking for someone to start a project on low-income black men, and wondered if Shawn would be interested in the job. Shawn said yes, and six years later he has helped create an entire field of “black male achievement,” an ecosystem of organizations, programs, and leaders with one straightforward if daunting goal: give low-income African-American men and boys an opportunity to succeed, a pathway to the American dream.

    Under this umbrella is a Black Male Achievement Fellows Program, which supports social entrepreneurs in urban communities, in partnership with the Echoing Green Foundation. Then there is “BMe,” a collection of thousands of video testimonials that allow black men to tell their story in their own voices. Dove’s institute has also partnered with Mayor Michael Bloomberg in New York on the Young Men’s Initiative, a citywide effort to redirect black and Latino boys bound for prison to another path. Linda Gibbs, the deputy mayor of health and human services of New York, told me that the Young Men’s Initiative is about building a “continuum of services,” including job training, mentoring, and male-friendly health care to give troubled young men the best chance to succeed. In less than two years of running the program, Gibbs says they’ve seen a “dramatic reduction in the number of young men who are serving time,” as well as a reduction in re-arrests. (The program has sparked a similar effort in other cities called Cities United—in which Mayor Mitch Landrieu of New Orleans, Mayor Michael Nutter of Philadelphia, Casey Family Programs, and the National League of Cities are leading participants.)

    Dubois-fe0123-BlackMen-embed8Alex Wong/Getty“Racism is the belief that there’s something wrong with black people … something in our bones.”

    Dove has also convened other major funders—including William Bell of Casey and Robert Ross at the California Endowment—into a new Black Male Achievement Funders coalition, each with a different approach to a previously intractable problem. Ross, the California Endowment’s president and a pediatrician from the South Bronx who took a three-month sabbatical to study the issue of young black men in America, focuses on behavioral health and education. The California Endowment is funding programs to close the achievement gap in third-grade reading scores and develop alternative approaches to suspension when dealing with troubled boys. “Overly harsh discipline and suspension marginalizes, stigmatizes, and criminalizes these boys,” Ross told me. “When an African-American male in eighth grade has defiant behavior in the classroom, it’s like seeing a burn on their body; we need to treat their behavior as evidence of a problem to be solved rather than a kid to lock up.”

    There’s powerful work happening outside of Dove’s network as well. For example, Michael Curtin, CEO of D.C. Central Kitchen, believes the food industry can help to empower black men and women. Since 1989, the kitchen has served over 25 million meals to low-income people in the D.C. area—but don’t call it a food bank. Instead, Curtin, a former restaurateur, runs a rigorous culinary job-training program, using the process of meal preparation to help formerly homeless, addicted, and incarcerated men and women learn culinary skills and then find employment in the hospitality industry.

    I visited D.C. Central Kitchen recently and saw lines of men and women who were previously on the streets chopping vegetables, barking orders, and managing a full-scale industrial operation. Curtin told me at the time, “When I look back on my personal experience, I recognized that I was incredibly fortunate—I had a phenomenal family, I grew up in safe communities, and went to good schools. I made reckless decisions, but always had someone there to put me back on track. Many of the men and women who come to us grew up in very different circumstances—when they messed up, they didn’t have someone to help get them back on track. What we’re trying to do at D.C. Central Kitchen is provide people with that opportunity.”

    THE FIGHT for black men is being waged through policy and programs, as the work of Shawn Dove and Michelle Alexander shows. But there’s also a concurrent fight going on for their culture and soul—and in that battle, Ta-Nehisi Coates is at the forefront.

    Coates, a senior editor at The Atlantic, is a reluctant spokesman. He has shut down his Twitter account more than once. After penning several landmark columns for The New York Times, he declined the Times’s offer of a permanent weekly slot. And he does not write solely, or even primarily, about race. His recent topics of interest range from the conflict in Syria to Kurt Vonnegut. He speaks fluent French, and analyzes the hit show Mad Men with gusto.

    “Those triumphs over Southern segregation now seem suddenly pale against the shadows of poverty and despair in the ghetto,” Newsweek wrote in its 1967 story “Which Way for the Negro Now?”

    But try as he might, Coates cannot escape the mantle of leading cultural envoy. He writes in a way that’s inherently viral, moving fast from black hands to white and then around the world. What Henry Louis Gates says about race painstakingly, like an intricate symphony, and Cornel West declares elliptically, like a Pentecostal preacher or alto saxophonist, Coates offers straight up, with just a splash of hip-hop as a chaser.

    Consider his New York Times essay “The Good, Racist People,” which summed up in nine paragraphs what black men have been trying to get off their chests for the last 30 years. Through personal stories, he cast racism in America as “invisible violence,” perpetrated by well-meaning folks all around. Or his landmark piece for The Atlantic, “Fear of a Black President,” about what he calls the “false promise and double standard of integration” in the era of President Obama.

    Coates is at the fulcrum of a resurgent cultural conversation about black men, one that is advancing in a number of sectors. There is the painter Kehinde Wiley, who mixes classical techniques with contemporary subjects to create stunning portraits of blacks in America. There are rappers like Lupe Fiasco and Kendrick Lamar, who are using their lyrics to put new spins on old truths. In sports, Miami Heat great Dwyane Wade has teamed up with a cast of unlikely characters—including Grammy Award–winning artist Lecrae and conservative funder Foster Friess—to launch the “This Is Fatherhood” challenge, which encourages young people around the country, and particularly black men, to tell stories of what fatherhood means to them. In film, the talent agent Tamara Houston has launched a new organization, ICON MANN, to create a space for Hollywood’s leading black male actors to learn from one another and project their values to the world.

    But Coates is in many ways this movement’s biographer. In an interview, he told me that the goal of his writing is not to “fix” race relations in America. “I have folks who write me and want me to help out with their racist uncle; I don’t want any part of that,” he said with light-hearted sarcasm. But when pushed, he admitted that he does see himself as “an agent in pursuit of the truth of this country, of which I’m a citizen, in which I was raised, which I love.” “I want to understand it,” he continued. “I want to explore it, and make that exploration as honest as I can.”

    ‘My job,’ says Coates, ‘is to help close the gap between what they see in us and who we actually are.’

    I asked Coates about the best way to help black men who are struggling, and he didn’t point to a particular program. Instead, he said, “If there’s one thing that’s missing in our country, it’s an acknowledgment of the broad humanity of black folks. Racism—and anti-black racism in particular—is the belief that there’s something wrong with black people … and I mean something in our bones.” He continued, “In our own community, we’ve internalized this. We wonder if we lack moral courage.”

    “I want the country to understand that there’s nothing wrong with us,” Coates says, with urgency in his voice. “Things have happened in this country, but there’s nothing wrong with us. My job is to help close the gap between what they see in us and who we actually are.”

    “WHO WE actually are.” It took Joe Jones about two decades to figure that out. That’s how long he was strung out—after his dad pulled off in the Thunderbird, his mom went away to work, and he made a series of bad decisions on Edmonson Avenue; after jail made him more of a criminal and a junkie, not less. By 1986, Joe was spending \$800 to \$900 a day on a mixture of heroin and crack.

    There were some bright moments—the birth of his son, a job at the Social Security Administration. But in one way or another, they all were deflated, pricked by the same needle that he regularly thrust into his arm.

    Finally, facing a five-year prison sentence for drug possession, Joe argued and cajoled his way into an in-patient treatment program instead. He told me: “There was a six-month wait for the program, but I knew I needed to get in now. The only way you could get in was if you were crazy, so I acted as crazy as I could.”

    Dubois-fe0123-BlackMen-embed10Eric Thayer/ReutersRenowned educator Geoffrey Canada says kids need to be listened to.

    It worked. And from the moment he got serious treatment, things kept working for Joe. I asked him how it all came together, and he told me it was pretty simple: people listened to him, got to know him, and they liked him.

    There was the staff at the treatment center who grew to know Joe Jones as not just an addict but a man, “counselors and therapists who could help me understand why I did the things that I did.”

    There was the dean at Baltimore City Community College, who admitted Joe despite his criminal record. He and Joe became so close that Joe ended up counseling the dean when the dean’s son was struggling with his own drug addiction. Joe graduated from the college with an accounting degree, at the top of his class. There was also the young woman Joe met in the financial aid office at this community college—she liked him so much that she later became his wife.

    This phenomenon of knowing, and liking, was repeated over and over in my interviews with experts on troubled youth. As Geoffrey Canada, CEO of the Harlem Children’s Zone—our country’s go-to model for turning around tough neighborhoods—told me, “First you have to know them, and then you have to like them, enough to respect what they’re going through but not accept responses that may be inappropriate.”

    Canada continued, “You really do have to like them. Boys, when they’re threatened and angry, they act out in ways that make them difficult to deal with. They can become threatening, sullen, disrespectful. They learn to be frightening as a defense mechanism in the environments they have to navigate.”
    Obama’s relationship with his father—years of absence and brief flickers of presence—is one of the defining aspects of his life.

    “When you don’t like them,” he said, “those are reasons to get rid of them—to put them out of programs, put them out of schools, to call the police to deal with them, lock them up. But when they’re kids that you actually know, and actually like, they will listen to you, and you will listen to them. And that’s where change starts.”

    A few people got to know Joe Jones, and then like him. And his life changed. Joe entered a series of nonprofit jobs, from HIV counseling to health care, and eventually began working for the Baltimore Health Department. He persuaded the city of Baltimore to start a fatherhood program, along with programs on maternal and child health. These efforts were so successful that the mayor of Baltimore at the time, Kurt Schmoke, helped Joe spin them off into a larger, independent organization, which became the Center for Urban Families, the organization that Joe runs today.

    At CFUF, Joe uses evidenced-based models to help the same types of men and women he grew up around. Funded in part by Shawn Dove’s campaign, Joe’s center has a successful job-training program, including partnerships with major Baltimore employers. They have a fatherhood program that gives dads practical skills to reconnect with their kids and pay back child support. Joe also wrote state legislation called “Couples Advancing Together”; it’s based on a simple but powerful idea that low-income men and women who are romantically involved should develop life plans and financial goals together. Social programs focusing on job training and financial literacy have traditionally served these couples separately, instead of acknowledging that their goals and life plans are inherently intertwined. Joe’s couples-services concept has the potential to dramatically change how these programs work; it passed the Maryland legislature in April and was signed into law by Gov. Martin O’Malley in May.

    Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty ImagesWe may be “locking up the only potential we’ve got to revitalize inner-city neighborhoods. ”

    And a few weeks ago, something special happened. The man who perhaps most radically symbolizes both the hope of black men in America and the challenges from which they spring stopped by to see Joe Jones. President Obama, himself a product of a single-parent household, visited the Center for Urban Families to say hello to Joe and the men he serves. Obama met with employers, people being trained for jobs, and dads getting back on track. His remarks were private, candid, and—based on accounts from those in attendance—had quite an impact on a bunch of guys from West Baltimore who were struggling to make it by.

    Later that same weekend, Obama traveled to Morehouse College in Atlanta to deliver a speech to the black male graduates there. He was to talk about fatherhood and responsibility, and what African-American men must do to compete in the world. But in one brief, unscripted moment at Morehouse, the two dichotomized worlds of black men—Joe’s new one and his old one; the soaring heights of the presidency and the depths of the streets—briefly and powerfully collided.

    I had been a small part of the planning process for the speech. Obama’s relationship with his father—years of absence and brief flickers of presence—is one of the defining aspects of his life. While I grew up with a strong and supportive stepfather, my own biological father had a beautiful, tragic, and deeply complicated story—a black man who received a Ph.D. from Cornell University, and ended his life in a federal penitentiary in North Carolina. Out of this common set of experiences, I worked for years with the president on his fatherhood initiative, an effort to help absent fathers around the country get back on the right track.

    I had the text in front of me as Obama was delivering the speech. So it came as a surprise when, as the president neared his close, something pulled him away from the prepared remarks. He was supposed to be moving to a final story about one of the graduates, but instead started talking about men who had been left behind. I have to imagine he was picturing men like those he saw at the Center for Urban Families, men like those he had known his whole life. Men like Joe.

    “Whatever success I have achieved,” the president said, “whatever positions of leadership I have held have depended less on Ivy League degrees or SAT scores or GPAs, and have instead been due to that sense of connection and empathy—the special obligation I felt, as a black man like you, to help those who need it most, people who didn’t have the opportunities that I had.”

    He continued, “Because there but for the grace of God go I. I might have been in their shoes. I might have been in prison”—a jarring thing to hear from the president of the United States. “I might have been unemployed. I might not have been able to support a family. And that motivates me …”

    Obama’s voice faded off into a trail of emotion and applause, and he returned to the text. But the point was made.

    We have walked a winding road with black men in this country, with no small amount of pain and tears along the way. But all Americans have walked that road together. Our connection to each other is, as James Baldwin once said of the relationship between blacks and whites, “far deeper and more passionate than any of us like to think.” And it’s that connection, that empathy, that “there but for the grace of God go I” mentality, that must motivate our society’s efforts on behalf of low-income black men. Because our history, our present circumstance, and our humanity demand it. Because there are boys walking the streets of this country with the brightest of futures—the next Shawn Dove, the next Joe Jones, the next Barack Obama—if only they were given a shot.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  230. @Chris Mallory

    no, it was literally the WASPS who let them run wild. but don’t get your panties in a bunch, Mallory. i’m sure you profited greatly from it all.

  231. @American Bulwark

    My own mind is my own church. All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.

    he could have just said “i am a greedy gay ignorant freemason whose mind is a closed lodge with no windows, and i project my actions and intentions on other people”

    but that would have required honesty, and it wouldn’t have looked good in print, right?

  232. @Ben the Layabout

    “Detroit, Baltimore, etc.”

    Let me specifically add Memphis to that list. Back in the 1950s Memphis was predominantly White, prosperous, had a good school system, and was clean and safe. Every decade since then has increased the percentage of Blacks and decreased the percentage of Whites. Result? Metaphorically speaking, what used to be a four course meal of delicious food has been digested into a pile of hot steaming feces.

    I really, really, REALLY wish it were not so, but as near as I can tell, EVERY MAJOR CITY which goes to majority Black rule turns to feces. If there were even ONE counterexample I would encouraged with the hope that maybe that city could become an example to others. So far, no luck.

    Here are some pics of the Detroit Public Schools Book Depository:

    • Thanks: Drapetomaniac
  233. @Deep Thought

    Thanks for this! It looks very informative.

  234. @Alrenous

    Voters make the best slaves.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  235. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Drapetomaniac

    “Consent of the governed” reads as “governed are commanded to consent” and then they just do. “Yessir, consenting right away sir.”

  236. Dani says:
    @AceDeuce

    In my cyber travels over the past several years, and in my quest to help wake up normies, I have found myself receiving comments very similar to the ones you shared, where race and crime are concerned. I just hate that cyber world does not provide enough background info on people you talk to – and I can’t download my personal experience into their brains. I am not and was never, hate to use the word, but for arguments sake, “racist”. I was lucky enough to live in a place during a time where I experienced 4 years of high school having witnessed ZERO racial incident, and I absolutely mean that. I enjoyed the company of my black friends more than my white friends for a time (platonic only, interracial dating was unheard of and not instigated by either race, at least not openly) because I found them to be less boring at a certain age. We did not have anything even remotely resembling White guilt shoved down our throats and everyone was better for it. I saw and experienced what was possible and nobody can take that memory from me.
    To hear: “Well, who made them that way?” and ” If I were enslaved and lynched and segregated for hundreds of years, I’d be the same way” and “We’re lucky that’s all they’re doing, considering what we did to them” only serves to make me cringe now, as I’ve gone on to learn more realities of history that the average dope will go from cradle to grave without knowing. Whites are NOT responsible for slavery – I am FIRM on this and there is nothing anybody can show me or have me read to think differently than I am now aware of, and I trust what I have read implicitly. Lynching is a word that needs to go away and was only brought about recently for more White-hate incitement. Almost as many White men were lynched as were Black men – and of course they NEVER seem to mention anything whatsoever as to why black men were lynched – in some cases it was for the very reason White men were – STEALING. However, in the early days of emancipation (when many WHITES were still enslaved, mind you, but that’s another story), many Black men did not know what to do with their freedom – which in and of itself isn’t necessarily a problem, but becomes a problem when raping White women and young girls becomes a bit of an epidemic. I saw old newspapers that were converted from microfiche into digitized format & my eyes did not lie to me. This was a rampant problem even as late as the first decade of the 20th century – young white girls were abducted out of bedroom windows and often died after being raped – yes, White men didn’t take kindly to that. But our fucked up mainstream media says nothing about this and instead creates a false impression that blacks were being lynched on every available lamp-post in the country and it is pathetic.
    I very much believe things were OK for a while and would have stayed that way, but (((they))) saw fit to destroy any possible of that. I cringe to hear of de-segregation of schools because blacks did not ask for this – we had it thrust upon us and BOTH RACES suffered as a result. Fast forward to today, and we see the Whites have suffered egregiously since the 1960s, with the implementing of the completely RACIST, anti-White Civil Rights act. Black Americans are the only people within a nation that failed to establish their own society within a society, and instead, through letting the jews hijack them and their voices and over power them, asked, DEMANDED, to integrate into the White mans society. Look at the state of our society ever since – it’s all a JOKE. Blacks majoring in “gender studies” for doctorates – EFFING SORRY ASS JOKE.

    • Thanks: mark green
  237. What a circle jerk of inadequacy.

    Blacks are the violent ones – as told by people who would stand in a long line with maces, run at, and gore each other to death, and call it war.

    Blacks are the violent ones – as told by the global Crusaders, Inquisitors, Genocidists, World War ejaculators, Holocausters, Continental Invaders, Enslavers, pillagers and plunderers.

    Blacks are the violent ones – Yet a few whites were able to go control, mass steal from and enslave an entire continent of them, coming out unscathed, but oh dear, they need guns to protect themselves from black violence, not the looming revenge for the violence perpetuated upon them.

    Blacks are the violent ones – Yet the North and South American continents, in a 100 year span, saw the slaughter of hundreds of millions of it inhabitants who had been there for 13000 years, by non blacks.

    Blacks are the violent ones….. 300 plus comments from dolts trying so hard to hide from their innate documented nature by projecting hard. While they all see themselves as whip smart, not one would bring up the logic of historical deeds as harbinger. A few hundred years it took them to fuck up global social structures and ecology yet, here they are falling over each other to point at Blacks. lol.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  238. anarchyst says:
    @Los Audacity

    Observe any “inner-city” urban area where blacks are the majority and you will find a “combat zone”–no exceptions.

    • Replies: @Los Audacity
  239. @RoatanBill

    Why not wise up?

    Yes I am in complete awe of your libertarian ramblings like getting rid of the police. You really have it all figured out. Defunding the police was a complete success in Seattle and Portland. Worked out so great that the Seattle council is now begging police to return. The libertarian plan to legalize all drugs is just as genius. Selling crack in stores in Seattle will certainly make it better. Too bad we don’t have an island to test all these retarded Randian ideas that are centered in race denial.

    Putin needs to get rid of NATO because it is a bullshit organization that forever wants to further encroach on territory alongside Russia to sell inferior weapons systems while maligning Russia as a sales strategy.

    Do you deny any of the following:
    1. Ukraine doesn’t qualify for NATO
    2. Ukraine hasn’t applied for NATO
    3. France and Germany said they wouldn’t vote yes (it requires a unanimous vote)
    4. Nuclear missiles launched from Ukraine would be no more interceptable than nukes in Germany or Atlantic submarines. An attack from either side is suicidal even if zero nukes existed in continental Europe.
    6. Putin has since changed his explanation of the war from NATO to Donbass

    I’m not even sure why you even bring up NATO. Putin no longer talks about it. He has since admitted that the war is about territory:
    https://news.yahoo.com/putin-likens-himself-peter-great-092408553.html

    That is what I have said from the beginning. If NATO was the reason then he would have issued an ultimatum first. No need for a full scale invasion.

    Why would he shoot down Israeli planes?

    Maybe because he’s getting tired of their interference in Syria and threatening Russia’s partner, Iran. From an Israeli source:

    So you believe that he should shoot down Israeli plans in Syria even though he sells Israel its oil? Is that right?

    I got news for you which is that Putin will not be shooting down Israeli planes. He is pals with them and needs their oil and diamond money. Israel isn’t expected by the West to pass sanctions because the Arabs won’t sell them oil. Israel gets to play both sides and Putin enjoys the arrangement. You are seriously deluded if you think Russia will act aggressively towards Israel.

    You picked the wrong side in this war. Trying to defend a half-pint lying dictator was a bad idea. So in your history will we find you claiming that the war isn’t going to happen? Because the dictator says it is just a training exercise on the border?

    Israel will continue to get cheap oil from Russia because they are pals. Your dictator in height enhancing shoes thinks the Jews are great and loves doing business with them. Now go read some Rand and murmur to your crazy brain about how the Jews are the problem as you follow an ideology whose founders are nearly 100% Jewish. Nothing crazier than a Jew hating libertarian.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    , @RoatanBill
  240. @John Johnson

    Putin needs to get rid of NATO because it is a bullshit organization that forever wants to further encroach on territory alongside Russia to sell inferior weapons systems while maligning Russia as a sales strategy.

    Do you see any mention of Ukraine in that sentence? Ukraine is of no consequence as I’ve said before. NATO is a problem for Russia because it is constantly attempting to set up more and more weapons systems along Russia’s border. When the stupid Fins and Swedes announced their intent to join NATO, the red carpet was rolled out for them. NATO always wants more antagonism toward Russia because that means increased weapons sales for the US, the primary weapons supplier to NATO. It’s about the money.

    Russia invaded Ukraine to stop the slaughter of the Russian speaking people in the East after 8 years of harassment as Ukraine gov’t policy.

    Russia needs to show up NATO as a bad investment and have NATO cancelled. NATO disintegration further means the US loses their leverage over Europe. Once the US loses its influence, relation between the Europeans and Russia will improve and is why Russia hasn’t retaliated in kind to all the stupidity coming out of Brussels as a proxy for the entire EU member states.

    NATO, in the long run, is dead anyway; Russia just has to wait. As the US and European economies crumble and as winter sets in, the European populations will realize that their politicians have created an existential crisis for them. Regime change will happen to remove the people antagonizing Russia to bring in a fresh crew intent on better relation with the only reasonable supplier of energy and other resources available. This realization will sink in as temperatures decrease and as unemployment and cost of living increase, all due to idiotic sanctions and in general, the policies the bureaucrats have invented to commit slow suicide economically.

    Russia’s actions in Syria are a mixed bag. So far, all Russia has done is prevent the collapse of the Syrian gov’t and prevented more US arranged aggression. Turkey, the US, Iran and Israel all have cards to play in Syria. At some point, something will upset the equilibrium. I hope it takes Israel down a notch.

    The Ukraine operation shows Russia taking more and more territory with Ukraine now stipulating they are losing up to 1000 military personnel daily to death or injury. It’s a war of attrition for Ukraine while Russia has only involved a small percentage of their available forces. So, I consider Russia the eventual party that will stipulate the terms of a cessation of hostilities. If I were giving advice, I’d suggest taking the entire east of Ukraine leaving a land locked rump and not signing anything. I’d draw a line on the map and tell Ukraine that the fighting is over if they respect that line. If not, I’d pound them into the dirt.

    I don’t have a side in this conflict. I was against Russian boots on the ground if you check my history, but was for Russia taking out all military installations throughout all of Ukraine along with as many soldiers as possible using air power and missiles. When I see a Ukraine murdering their own citizens in the east, I naturally align with anyone that stops the carnage. Russia stepped in when the Europeans didn’t, so that means that in this one instance, Russia wears the white hat.

    BTW – I’m not a libertarian. I’m an anarchist and that means I have no respect for any head of any gov’t.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  241. @John Johnson

    Now, as a separate issue, I’ll address your dishonest straw man, make shit up screed about defund police.

    My position is to defund street cops because they are useless as so many incident clearly demonstrate, Uvalde being the latest. I have stated on numerous occasions that I would take the money saved by eliminating street cops and using that money for more detectives, forensics people and their support staff that actually do provide a necessary service.

    Check my comment history.

    Further, my position has been to simultaneously give the people their 2nd amendment rights by allowing adults to carry their weapon of choice without obtaining any permission from gov’t to act as their own street cop thus providing them with their natural right of self protection that no legitimate gov’t can interfere with.

    Your pointing to Portland is your dishonesty on display since Portland never allowed their citizenry to take care of the shit in their city.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  242. “Your argument is laughable on its face. Consult some more statistics Einstein. I already made a case (with linked article) that Blacks commit about 75% of the homicides in the USA. For violent crimes, there too they are by far the biggest “producer” of this dubious service. Numbers vary, but their overall violent crime rate is probably ten times that of Whites. The convicted felon rate is not quite 7x that of whites, if I recall correctly. About ten percent of ALL black males are currently in jail or prison. Estimates vary, but between 25% and 33% of black males (not sure if all ages, or just the peak criming years, roughly 14-39) are already convicted felons.”

    ohhh boy another long winded assail. You have totally missed the point. And missing the point you proceed to make a list of contentions, I don’t dispute. It is well known that whatever population hold the most of the worst aspects of poverty, etc. will almost by definition also hold the the highest rates of social dysfunction — shock of shock. An artifact of the human condition well known world wide.

    First, the article addressed the use of firearms. nd I limited my comments to firearms.

    Second, based on that very narrow issue. given the comments on that issue by Mr. Masters, his comments suggest an over generalizations regarding black citizens in general. Such overgeneralizations could classified as “racist” and i would advise against using the tats as they are in the article.

    Third, as opposed to tackling your breakdown. I thought first I would examine some of your major contends. It only took one to conclude — that you are overstating your case as well as missing my point in a an attempt to score some social credit or points.

    The back male population all encompassing is around 22 million. The entire prison population hovers around 2.4 million. If in fact 10% f the black male population was in jail or prison that would constitute. That would essentially equate to the entire black population comprising 2.2 million or nearly the entire prison system, That simply is not the case. Roughly there about 750 thousand black males in prison, that’s 3.4090909091% of the black male population. You are simply wrong on the basics. Now against the entire black population, it’s about 1.7%.

    Neither statistic descriptive of the black population on the whole. And that any would make such a generalizations — a typical practice among many — it could reasonably be implied that such use iof numbers is a “racist”. As I note, it’s a term I rarely use. And even here, I am careful to limit its application to the rhetoric, not ay character trait of anyone. There is a difference.

    Hmmmmm . . . I think your grasp of the numbers ion context is shallow. I used bandy about these numbers. Even when the numbers are correct, its a tad less descriptive of truth than you claim. I just don’t think there is enough numerical support to the general conclusion. Now both liberals and conservatives, republicans, “law and order folks” use these numbers for their own purposes.

    one to insist that the black population needs more restrictive treatment and punishment and or they deserve the illegal and social maltreatment they have been delivered

    the other to insist on increased funding for untested and sloppy programs all of which need more government money.

    ————————————————–

    “Egalitarianism is Satanism. The elite commie wants to cause as much suffering as possible.”

    Hmmm . . .

    well,

    I do believe that all US citizens and US citizens in particular are entitled to equal standing before our system of governance. Does not equate to equal everything as human beings or citizens. But absolutely before the law and our system of governance and the like.

    My moniker, has no political implications at all. I tend to lean, conservative, certainly far more than Pres Reagan. I tend to lean to the New testament and the old testament on matter of faith and practice. My preferred economy practices are capitalist in nature, with caveats, as businesses and their institutional cohorts have demonstrated that given the opportunity — they will engage in dishonest dealings — a primary violation of

    conservative ethos
    christian faith and practice
    and capitalism

    I lean very heavily nationalist — we don’t need s single immigrant from anywhere until we get our own ducks in line for our citizens.

    and contrary top the sentiments expressed, the back population on the whole and myself have major canyons politically — I consider myself risk. Laugh

  243. @anarchyst

    You tried.

    Your logic though, if we can even call it that, is so shallow, fraught and devoid of thought. No wonder you could not touch any of the laid out points. I will leave you in your utter blindness. as it would take gargantuan effort to give you eyes.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  244. Anymike says:
    @Francis Miville

    That’s a dismal picture and prognosis then.

  245. Anymike says:
    @littlereddot

    Not going to run down the whole thing, but with modern transportation, sending everybody in North America back where they came from, except for those who are certifiably Native is possible and could be accomplished in no more than 20 years, probably less. The trick is, you don’t have to remove everyone, just the people of reproductive age. The older people could be withdrawn to enclaves where they would be allowed to peacefully die out

    All of North America could then be turned into a reservation. No, sorry I said that, a human biodiversity zone. What was I thinking anyway?

    Yes, it could be done. I estimate it would take a fleet of about 150 widebody jets and maybe a dozen modern cruise ships shuttling across the Atlantic. As the operation proceeded, more and more people would age out of the reproducing population and many of the existing children would become old enough that they would be legal adults and not need to be accompanied.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  246. Anymike says:
    @Rod T Factor

    The plausible plans for partition of the United States on racial lines do not postulate giving blacks a “remote” corner but in fact some prime real estate in the Southeastern United States, including most or all of Georgia and some of the other territory in the surrounding states.

    Years ago, racial dissenter Jared Taylor proposed a three-sided partition which would divide the United States into a Black Separatist State (BSS), a White Separatist State (WSS) and an integrated or multi racial state which would be the continuation and legal successor to the present United States. The only thing you might need to add is an Hispanic territory legally independent of both Mexico and the United States. Most whites would not want to live in the WSS. One effect of this partition could be that the black families who have been in the North for generation and never adapted to Northern life would leave. I am not going to say that they should be forced too but with a combination of strong incentives and social pressure, they could be seriously encouraged to do so.

    The point of the integrated state would be that the cities would no longer be packed with the landless peasants of the world. In politics, the block vote these represent would no longer exist and two-party politics could return to being something less than a blood sport. The political system might even become functional again and people could chose their party affiliation for reasons that were not entirely ideological but more related to personal, family and local traditions.

    It would not be a paradise, but it would be functional society. The WSS would be prosperous. In the BSS, something would have to be done to force everyone into some kind of economically productive activity. Only the avant garde artist class could be exempted and supported.

  247. Alrenous says: • Website
    @RoatanBill

    Just have to violently overthrow the illegitimate government first, that’s all. It’s not like they’re going to leave peacefully.

    And outlaw democracy for causing it in the first place.

    If it were possible it would have already happened.

  248. @RoatanBill

    Do you see any mention of Ukraine in that sentence? Ukraine is of no consequence as I’ve said before. NATO is a problem for Russia because it is constantly attempting to set up more and more weapons systems along Russia’s border.

    Do tell which weapons system and how exactly it is a threat in the context of Russia having over 10k nukes.

    Russia invaded Ukraine to stop the slaughter of the Russian speaking people in the East after 8 years of harassment as Ukraine gov’t policy.

    Well that may be your opinion but Putin has changed his explanation 4 times now. The latest explanation is for territory:
    https://nypost.com/2022/06/10/vladimir-putin-compares-himself-to-peter-the-great/

    NATO, in the long run, is dead anyway; Russia just has to wait.

    Fascinating analysis. After the invasion NATO funding has increased and more countries like Finland want to join thanks to Putin threatening them.

    Well done Putin.

    But in your mind NATO is somehow dying.

    NATO is not going anywhere after this stupid invasion. They will expand because Putin has proven that shared security is needed to protect European countries from lunatic Russian dictators. Putin is not trying to strategize against NATO. That is why there was never an ultimatum. He is simply dying and wants to go down as a Tsar that took land.

    When I see a Ukraine murdering their own citizens in the east, I naturally align with anyone that stops the carnage. Russia stepped in when the Europeans didn’t, so that means that in this one instance, Russia wears the white hat.

    So why does Russia shell residential areas if they are trying to save people? Why did they try to take Kiev? Why not issue an ultimatum over Donbass?

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  249. @John Johnson

    NATO is a US proxy. NATO has nuclear weapons. Combined, the US and NATO have lots of nuclear weapons. These weapons aren’t the sole issue. The US has bases all over Europe that are there to counter a Russian threat that’s completely manufactured to sell US weapons. Russia has no Russian bases all over Europe, the US or anywhere near the US. It’s the asymmetry that’s the problem. It’s the constant threat, that’s the problem.

    You can shove the NY Post. It’s a propaganda organ just like all the controlled media in the US.

    Increased NATO funding using from thin air currency is going to do nothing but help to stimulate price inflation and quicken the Euro and Dollar demise. Well done, Europe and the US. You’re correct in that NATO won’t disappear due to Russia. NATO will disappear when the European and US economies fail.

    The Ukraine forces embed themselves where the civilians are, so they use civilian shields. Russia has tried to avoid civilian casualties as much as possible, but civilians are always casualties in war. Russia could have sent in heavy bombers to take out whole cities, but hasn’t. Russia never tried to take Kiev. The Minsk accords were the agreement that Ukraine decided not to implement.

    • Agree: Realist, Pat Kittle
  250. anarchyst says:
    @Los Audacity

    If you are white, get dropped off at 7-Mile Road and Van Dyke Avenue in Detroit and see how long you last.
    If you are black, you will fit right…and will not have a problem with the “locals”.

    • Replies: @Detroit Refugee
  251. @anarchyst

    No thanks! I am fully aware of what takes place up in that ‘hood.

  252. @Anymike

    Actually you are very right. But it would apply to across the planet. My hunch is that the human population is now near its peak. If the Chinese plans come to fruition, then all those under developed countries with sky high population growth will start to develop. With development, population growth will start falling. The examples are all around us. The population growth rates of the East Asian tigers are already amongst the lowest, if not the lowest in the world.

    When this happens, we will have to start putting serious thought into how we can hand back all the lands we have occupied back to nature in a responsible way.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  253. Anymike says:
    @littlereddot

    The problem is, by then there may be no “we” anymore, and it won’t be our problem. Nature has a way of taking over lands that are left fallow and unoccupied all without our help. Remember, nature has been rebuilding and repurposing the dry land of the world for 400,000,000 years now. Si ella puede. Yes she can.

  254. @Mefobills

    While I lean in your favor, I have to say that the back and forth between you and Roatan across articles is among the most valuable contributions to the individualist vs collectivist debate I have come across. Kudos to you both.

    On his side, you have the basic material fact that a human individual is exactly that, something that cannot be divided in two, without destroying it. For this reason, a libertarian is, in a way, a help to collectivism, in that he is willing to preserve himself no matter what: after all, a collective cannot exist without individuals.

    On your side, humans are mammals whose mode of life depends on a clan of similar beings supporting each other. Left to our individual selves we would all die. We are not reptiles. We need each other, and for more than a momentary fuck. So, if we all decided that we would never sacrifice our own existence for the group, we would all vanish, thus destroying our individual selves.

    It is between the ideologies of individualism and collectivism that real human life is lived. The dialectic tension between the two poles is the eternal struggle that characterizes our species.

    That struggle is, however, constantly being complicated by technological development. In our hyper modern society we are living two extremes – we are as lonely as ever, and don’t know our own neighbors, yet we are materially dependent on distant others more than ever before. In short, the ability to be private from our neighbors depends on dependency from people we will never meet.

    Why are we here? I don’t know, but maybe the purpose of our existence is to extract the knowledge of good and evil, right and wrong, from the inescapable dialectical tension of our material existence.

    Keep up the good work. Cheers to you and Roatan as well.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2