The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
After Russian Peace Offer, US Says They Will “Not Compromise” on Lunatic NATO Expansion Plans
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Russia wants war.

Otherwise, they would have no problem with the US placing mid-range nukes on their border in a country that they overthrew with a color revolution.

RT:

The US “will not compromise” on NATO expansion, the White House reiterated on Friday, following proposals from Russia outlining how it believes Moscow and the West can deescalate ongoing tensions in the east of Europe.

“We have seen the Russian proposals. We are discussing them with our European allies and partners,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told journalists onboard Air Force One on Friday when asked about the Russian documents.

She added that the US won’t accept the idea of stopping NATO expansion in Europe, despite what Russia wants.

“We will not compromise the key principles on which European security is built, including that all countries have the right to decide their own future and form policy free from outside interference,” she said.

Moscow sees the expansion of NATO towards its border as a critical threat to its national security, based on the bloc’s confrontational stance toward Russia.

A verbal promise not to move the organisation to the east was given to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev during negotiations on the reunification of Germany. Those assurances were memory-holed after the dissolution of the USSR. In 2017, declassified US documents backed up Moscow’s version of events.

Yeah, they probably should have gotten that one in writing, lol.

Russia does this whole nice guy thing with giving these totally reasonable offers only to be insulted and threatened even harder. I don’t know if it’s for the consumption of a domestic audience or a European one, but I guess it’s a useful performance.

Obviously, everyone in Russia knows the US is fixated on war, and if Russia comes out for the six millionth time and says “what about if instead of having a war, we didn’t have a war?”, every single time, the US is going to make this face:

For the record, Hitler did all of this “please, let’s not have a war” stuff too. But of course he lost the war, so no one remembers that.

Just so, if Russia wins this war, they could just say they did all of these peace offers, even if they hadn’t actually done that.

Anyway, yeah – I think the US is going to have a hard time getting Europe on board with this.

But it does look as though the decision has already been made in Washington, and now we’re just going through the motions.

To be clear, I’m not talking about a nuclear war, or a war inside of Russia proper, but just a proxy war in the Ukraine.

Of course, all of these US ISIS terrorists in Russia will start blowing things up inside of Russia as soon as it pops off, which is going to put Russia in a tough spot.

But I mean – this war is going to be run by the exact same people who swore Kabul would hold for six months.

Interesting times.

P.S.

Daily reminder that the Jew who runs Breitbart is shilling a war with Russia.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Military, NATO, Russia, Ukraine 
Hide 88 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Let’s keep in mind that the (D) party scum also hate Russia for a very simple reason. They’re white people. They still respect classical Western civilization, culture, music . . . the very things that the American Orc loves to burn and smash.

    Why else was Trump cast as a Putin stooge/puppet/buddy? If Trump is the World’s Biggest Racist and Biggest Threat to Democracy, then obviously his “handlers” must be even worse.

  2. Emslander says:

    To be clear, I’m not talking about a nuclear war, or a war inside of Russia proper, but just a proxy war in the Ukraine.

    Are you being sarcastic with that assertion? Your humor is often deeply buried.

    A war with Russia over Ukraine would very probably turn into all out nuclear war. Remember that. Joe Biden, the old fool, wants to go out in a blaze that is smothered by mushroom clouds. He could accomplish what Trump promised but never delivered. He would drain the swamp.

    It would also clean up the streets of San Francisco, but even those benefits are probably not enough to outweigh the downside costs.

    • Replies: @Joe Paluka
  3. Anonymous[286] • Disclaimer says:

    “We will not compromise the key principles on which European security is built, including that all countries have the right to decide their own future and form policy free from outside interference,” she said.

    Funny. Ukraine’s future was decided by “Fuck Europe” (((Victoria Nudelman))) and ruled by an unbreakable chain of Jews since the coup. Meanwhile, “European security” was built on (((NATO’s))) principles of not allowing members that can immediately drag them into a war but now it’s fine when it’s likely to lead to a nuclear WW3 scenario.

    You can’t make this shit up.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  4. @American Citizen

    It’s not Whites who hate Russia, genius.

    • Agree: Fr. John
  5. @Jim Christian

    (D) Party scum was my exact term, plenty of GoodWhites whose self-loathing we see examples of everyday. It’s no surprise they can’t stand Putin, an intelligent white man who is surrounded by intelligent white men.

    • Replies: @Showmethereal
  6. anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:

    They’re loading up the unrepresentative Ukrainian dictatorship with weapons and egging them on. The US will fight the Russians to the last Ukrainian. Selling a bunch of costly weapons and getting loads of people killed seems to be a US specialty around the world, invading and bombing countries all over the map and defying anyone to do anything about it. What’s a few hundred thousand dead as opposed to a stock market surge?
    A war scare, or even a moderate involvement in one, would be a shot in the arm for the failing US regime. They’d be able to ratchet up homeland security dictatorship, muzzle contrary views, incarcerate people, impose lockdowns, explain away economic hardships. The covid lockdown and internal passport system will really come in handy for this. Just a coincidence they happened to have developed such a system of control beforehand.

  7. So, can we expect some firework over Country 404, as someone so picturesquely described Ukraine? Why Russia is playing everything by the book is a mystery to me, when the other party no longer bothers even to declare war (on somebody, anybody) before invading countries and bombing them to oblivion (Laos was the most bombed country in the world without ever being at war with the US). President Putin does this all this to what purpose – to convince the future generations that Russia played by the rules? If the morons have the last word, and we go through a WWIII, future generations may have other pressing needs than reading the history of the WWIII, looking for uncontaminated water and food, for example. To see the successor to the League of Nations disappear in a glorious cloud, on some live camera, is a very small consolation for surviving the WWIII.

    • Replies: @Bill
    , @Harold Smith
  8. Corvinus says:

    “Russia does this whole nice guy thing with giving these totally reasonable offers only to be insulted and threatened even harder. I don’t know if it’s for the consumption of a domestic audience or a European one, but I guess it’s a useful performance.”

    LOL, I didn’t realize whole nice guy Russia entailed oligarchy, the poisoning of political opponents, the suppression of the media, and the threatening of neighbors. You make a great stooge, Mr. Anglin.

    “Obviously, everyone in Russia knows the US is fixated on war”

    Projection.

  9. gottlieb says:

    The USA, $30 trillion in debt has no choice but to act the Great White Shark, relentlessly moving forward gobbling up all it can before it explodes in a biblical bout of indigestion, spewing its bile around the globe, a dark winter of greed.

    Forget masks in schools, let’s bring back duck and cover drills.

    • Agree: Fr. John
    • Replies: @Mr Black
  10. That tweet from Pollak is astonishing. It serves as a reminder that people whose job is politics, even people who ‘get it’ on many issues, can still be deeply wrong on a critical issue, based on delusion and/ or perfidy.

    It’s also worth noting someone like Glenn Greenwald does understand this is a crisis provoked by the Feds, and that said operatives are recklessly poking a bear that doesn’t actually want to fight them.

    The relationship between individuals, groups, and the state, and the way this reality is filtered and distorted through the media is nuanced, contradictory, frequently irrational, and subject to great change.

    In many ways it’s so chaotic and confusing that the unscrupulous can easily take advantage of the situation. Anyone who values honesty doesn’t possess the same capabilities.

    Society is indeed a complex affair.

    • Agree: Decoy
    • Replies: @Bill
  11. Robjil says:
    @Corvinus

    US is fixated on war

    It is reality. The US/Zion empire loves wars and coups.

    The suppression of the media is what our western MSM does 24/7. Only few sites like this and books tell the real deal about what is happening in the worst ( the former west).

    An Oligarchy of the worst kind has been ruling the west since the beginning of this Covid theme.

    US ukraine is a US puppet. Over 10,000 civilians have been killed by shelling from US puppet regime on the people of Donbass since the US coup of 2014. This is right on Russia’s border. If Ukraine invades this border region. Russia will have huge a overflow of millions of people.

    All Russia is doing by being near the border is to prevent the US puppet regime from invading this border region of Ukraine that does not want to be a US puppet.

    The projection is that the US/Zion empire is looking in a mirror.

    • Agree: Avery
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  12. Phibbs says:

    Jews dislike Russia for three main reasons: Russia is friendly to Israel’s enemies (Syria & Iran). Russian Christians are aware that the Jewish-Bolshevist Revolution of 1917, which resulted in the murders of millions of Russian Christians, was a Jewish revolution. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn stated, the Jews who took over Russia in 1917 hated Russians, Russian culture, Russian history, the Tsar and Christianity. (The Jewish publishing companies banned Solzhenitsyn’s book outlining the Jewish Communist revolution.) Finally, Russians know that it was Jews (oligarchs) who looted Russia in the 1990’s. Most Russian Christians dislike Jews — and who can blame them? We Gentile Americans have numerous reasons to hate Jews, too — starting with the blatant disloyalty of the Jews in America and their takeover of Washington D.C. and the media to keep in place the insane Mideast foreign policies which get Gentile-Americans killed and advance only Israel’s interests. Jews are the main drivers of BLM-mania, identity politics, cancel culture, wokeness and censorship. The Jews have all but destroyed this country. Jews hate everybody who is not a Jew. We Gentiles need to hate the Jews as well. Next, we need to kick all of them out of this country. It’s time for the Synagogue of Satan to get its just rewards.

    • Agree: Fr. John
  13. Petermx says:

    “there would be no negotiations on European security without European allies and partners” . But when Europe, in particular, Europe’s biggest economy Germany wants to import gas from Russia the European allies opinions don’t matter and the US will sanction German and other companies involved in building the pipeline. European security is not important in that case. They can freeze to death or buy the much more expensive gas from the USA.

    “We will not compromise the key principles on which European security is built, including that all countries have the right to decide their own future and form policy free from outside interference,” But that was not the view the USA had in 1962 when Cuba requested that the USSR install nuclear missiles on their territory. The USA almost started a nuclear war with the USSR, demanding those nuclear missiles be removed from Cuban territory.

    “Jen Psaki actually said that the test of Putin’s respect for the territorial integrity of other nations would be whether or not he invaded Ukraine. This after he seized portions of Georgia and Ukraine already. Remember that this is the crowd that claimed Trump was weak on Russia.” Lies! Georgia invaded South Ossetia and Russia defended them and South Ossetia then decided to become part of Russia and in Ukraine’s case, Crimea held a plebiscite on whether to remain part of Ukraine or join Russia after the US helped overthrow the Ukrainian government and install an anti-Russian (largely Jewish) government and the ethnically Russian Crimeans voted to join Russia. The outside world was invited to send observers to watch that vote (the US should do that for its next presidential vote, Trump should demand it) and the US and its allies refused to send anyone, but Austria sent a contingent to watch the voting and said it was done in a friendly environment and the vote was fair.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    , @raga10
  14. Corvinus says:
    @Robjil

    “It is reality.”

    More like a manufactured reality on your part. For over 50 years, I’ve heard how the U.S. or Russia or China is going to get an itchy trigger finger and start blasting. But it’s mere posturing.

    “The US/Zion empire loves wars and coups.”

    Trump and his cronies assuredly.

    “The suppression of the media is what our western MSM does 24/7. Only few sites like this and books tell the real deal about what is happening in the worst ( the former west).”

    More like tin cup narratives.

    “If Ukraine invades this border region. Russia will have huge a overflow of millions of people.”

    Probably not.

    “All Russia is doing by being near the border is to prevent the US puppet regime from invading this border region of Ukraine that does not want to be a US puppet.”

    Not really.

    So, are the Jews under your bed or in your closet this time?

    • Troll: RoatanBill, Robjil, lavoisier
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  15. @Petermx

    They really take us for utter idiots.

    The Ukraine being a 100% owned chickenswinger enterprise,
    the Usual Suspects will listen to Tuvalu before they allow “Europe”
    (read: Germany) a say.

  16. Yeah, everyone in Russia “knows” Russia doesn’t want war. That’s why putinist Russia is keeping troops in Ukraine (Crimea and Donbas), Georgia and Moldova, and is rattling nuke sabers, and is deploying troops to the Ukrainian frontier.

    Putin could easily avoid war. Pull the troops out of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, and fix his own country rather than bothering the neighbors. The only people who think Russia doesn’t want war are those that swallow Putin’s lies. a good example of those people is the author of the screed above.

    • Agree: Corvinus
    • LOL: Realist
  17. Putin did nothing about (((NATO))) gobbling up the Baltic States, Poland, Hungary, etc.

    and barely managed, at the last moment, to salvage his client in Syria.

    and he will do nothing about (((NATO))) gobbling up Ukraine, except

    talk, talk, and talk. He is now completely cocoon’d

    by (((Atlanticists))).

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  18. Bill says:
    @Old Brown Fool

    I’ve been wondering what Russia is doing since 2013/4 when she so massively underreacted to the coup in the Ukraine. Clearly they are playing to some audience. But what audience? The Western Europeans seem the most likely, but what is the point of that? Do they really think they can peel off Germany from the US side like this?

    • Replies: @Old Brown Fool
  19. Bill says:
    @Bing Bong Trump

    Pollack “gets it” the way Screwtape “gets it.” He understands what’s going on and is on the side of evil.

  20. Avery says:
    @Corvinus

    { the poisoning of political opponents, the suppression of the media, and the threatening of neighbors}

    Poisoning of political opponents: the standard issue Anglo-American lie, manufactured out of thin cloth. Same kind of lie as the so-called “Steele Dossier” manufactured by British MI6. Even your New York Times finally admitted that it was fake.

    the suppression of the media: Really? Of course nothing of the sort happens in supposedly law-abiding Anglosphere, where Assange is kidnapped, tortured for months and will be sent to US to be disappeared in the American Gulags.

    the threatening of neighbors: let’s see you produce actual sentences by President Putin, or FM Lavrov, or Kremlin spokesmen/women to that effect.

    { You make a great stooge, Mr. Anglin.}

    No, actually you do make a great stooge: you an anti-Christian, anti-American, warmongering bigot.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  21. @Anonymous

    Funny. Ukraine’s future was decided by “Fuck Europe” (((Victoria Nudelman))) and ruled by an unbreakable chain of Jews since the coup.

    EU should rename itself FU.

    • LOL: Petermx
    • Replies: @nsa
  22. raga10 says:
    @Petermx

    But that was not the view the USA had in 1962 when Cuba requested that the USSR install nuclear missiles on their territory. The USA almost started a nuclear war with the USSR, demanding those nuclear missiles be removed from Cuban territory.

    Not quite the same situation because nobody is talking about installing nuclear missiles in Ukraine. Even if (and that’s a big if) Ukraine was allowed to join NATO it would not automatically mean moving nukes to their territory.

    Speaking of which, when Soviet Union broke up Ukraine inherited significant number of nuclear warheads as well as a number of Tu-160 strategic bombers. (Fun fact: at the time they actually had more Tu-160’s than Russians themselves).

    However after some negotiations Ukraine eventually accepted Russian assurances of non-aggression and returned those weapons to Russia. Big mistake, Ukraine!

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Petermx
  23. @Emslander

    “Remember that. Joe Biden, the old fool, wants to go out in a blaze that is smothered by mushroom clouds.”

    I think that it’s more likely that Biden will go out with a jammer and a loaded diaper.

  24. @American Citizen

    1. I’m a proud Democrat

    2. I live in China and have a great deal of affection for Russia and its people

    3. If America goes to war with Russia, I believe America will lose and NATO will weaken or collapse.

    That is why I support all these Moishes banging the war drum.
    That is why I support Joe Biden.
    That is why I donate to AOC.
    That is why I am part of a Blue Wave that will strike down all of your hopes and dreams with the assistance of Chinese-made vote tallying this software.
    That is why I suggest to my students that if they are drafted into a fight against America, they refuse to take White American prisoners from the South.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
    , @Anonymous
  25. Corvinus says:
    @Avery

    “Poisoning of political opponents: the standard issue Anglo-American lie, manufactured out of thin cloth.”

    Not quite.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/poisoning-putin-opponent-renews-spotlight-deadly-russian-chemical-weapon

    https://abcnews.go.com/International/navalny-long-history-russian-poisonings/story?id=72579648

    “Same kind of lie as the so-called “Steele Dossier” manufactured by British MI6. Even your New York Times finally admitted that it was fake.”

    Not quite.

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective

    “the suppression of the media: Really? Of course nothing of the sort happens in supposedly law-abiding Anglosphere, where Assange is kidnapped, tortured for months and will be sent to US to be disappeared in the American Gulags.”

    Red herring on your part. But, i cannot wait for Assange to get his day in court. It is going to happen.

    “the threatening of neighbors: let’s see you produce actual sentences by President Putin, or FM Lavrov, or Kremlin spokesmen/women to that effect.”

    It’s his actions.

    https://breakingdefense.com/2021/04/why-putin-threatens-ukraine/

    “No, actually you do make a great stooge: you an anti-Christian, anti-American, warmongering bigot.”

    To the contrary, I am an older white man (more white than you), who is a proud citizen of the U.S.. who favors peaceful resolutions to problems and makes his own decisions about race and culture.

  26. Corvinus says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Hey, why is your love for well-endowed Jewesses blog down?

    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
  27. Robjil says:
    @raga10

    Big mistake, Ukraine!

    It was not a big mistake. The big mistake was Nuland and co. taking over Ukraine. Ukraine lost her independence on 2/22/14. Why would the world want a US puppet regime with nukes?

    https://www.rt.com/russia/543419-ukraine-border-crisis-blame/

    By October 2021, a poll from the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology revealed that his approval had collapsed to a mere 24%. When Zelensky’s deputy chief of staff, Oleg Tatarov, complained about the foreign control over the government, he was immediately suspended and indicted.

    • Replies: @raga10
  28. nsa says:
    @Priss Factor

    “EU should rename itself FU”
    How about JU?

  29. Petermx says:
    @raga10

    It’s much worse. As a NATO member they could put nuclear missiles in Ukraine at any time and they could mass NATO troops right at the Russian border. It would be a bigger threat than what Cuba would have been to the USA.

    • Agree: Joe Levantine
    • Thanks: Showmethereal
    • Replies: @Miro23
  30. Petermx says:

    “Why would the world want a US puppet regime with nukes?” World Jewry wants a US puppet regime with nukes. Jews have supreme power in the US and Ukraine and Ukrainians are oblivious to the fact that under Jewish leadership Americans have constantly referred to and treated Ukrainians as “NAZIS” since WW II. Ukraine gets big backing because Jews are in power there and Ukrainian nationalism has been exterminated.

    Instead of discussing what Bolshevik Jews did to Ukrainians and others in the Soviet Union the Ukrainians are getting drenched with holocaust propaganda and the Ukrainians are accused of being Jew killers, just as they have often been accused in the USA of the same thing. Young Ukrainians are brought to Israel and when they come home talk of “anti-Semitism” and the evil Arabs surrounding Israel. I met one when I was in Ukraine. Ukraine’s national hero Stephan Bandera and many other Ukrainians fought on the side of the Germans to free Ukraine from the communist murderers and the Jews won’t stop until the statue of him in Lviv is torn down. Despite dominating the first Soviet gov’t and founding the Soviet Union on principles central to their own interest (Christianity and “anti-Semitism” were forbidden) and tens of millions killed, the bloody Jewish leaders of the regime are covered with Teflon. They are impervious to any accusations and will come out smelling like a rose.

    That is what the USA does for Jews, Ukraine and all of Europe.

    • Thanks: Robjil
  31. @Phibbs

    I agree with you on almost every point. All except one. No, don’t kick the Jews out of the country. A horrible infliction on Gentiles elsewhere.

    Disenfranchise them, put them all in ghettos. Require banks loans to be interest-free, except for Jews, who must pay interest on all their borrowings. Verify that they are indeed paying the interest, and Gentiles have no liability.

    And make them all wear a large yellow badge in public, shaped like a pig’s snout.

  32. raga10 says:
    @Robjil

    It was not a big mistake.

    If Ukraine kept those nukes Russians would have probably thought twice before marching into Crimea and they likely would not be threatening invasion right now. Even if Ukrainian leadership had Zero approval rate Russians would find a way of living with that somehow… and btw, I’m not usually one to attack the sources rather than information, but seriously – on this subject, you’re going to quote RT with a straight face ?!

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Hunsdon
  33. Miro23 says:
    @Petermx

    It’s much worse. As a NATO member they could put nuclear missiles in Ukraine at any time and they could mass NATO troops right at the Russian border. It would be a bigger threat than what Cuba would have been to the USA.

    That looks like the idea. Escalate the pressure on Russia until they are obliged to act. Then squawk about “Russian aggression” through their owned Western media.

    A proxy conflict with Russia in Ukraine would carry a lot of benefits from the ZioGlob POV:

    – Force Europe to get back into line under US (NATO) hegemony.

    – Have gentiles kill gentiles once again. Even better when they’re Russians and Ukrainians.

    – Introduce a War Emergency and further 1) run the FED printing press 2) fill the MIC feeding trough 3) develop US totalitarianism.

    They calculate that it would stay local since an all out nuclear war would be the end of Russia. It wouldn’t really matter if Russia recaptured Ukraine since the idea is only to reinstate ZioGlob hegemony over the West.

    So what options does that leave Putin?

    His best bet would probably be to organize a reverse Colour Revolution in Kiev = chase out the Jewish CIA elite and create a non-aligned independent Western Ukraine. Germany would be OK with that, and in fact they would probably be relieved. Taking into account that they can’t get gas through Nordstream2, then it has to keep flowing through the Ukraine network (a war would cut off the supply ).

    • Replies: @Petermx
  34. R.C. says:

    Anglin: Sir: Your DS front page needs some adjustment. Articles in specific categories routinely drop off of your front page and then, some days later, one might see the lead image for the article, but often one doesn’t. I’m no net wizard but I bet that if you lowered the font size on the front page, it might show more articles so they don’t drop off so quickly.
    Fight on, fellow pureblood!
    R.C.

  35. @Supply and Demand

    4. In the event of a Russia-Ukraine War, there will be no military intervention by America or NATO, as has already been indicated by Western leaders.

    5. Commodity prices, particularly oil and gas, will skyrocket, exacerbated by new Western economic sanctions on Russia. This will precipitate the end of the USD as the World’s reserve currency.

    6. The resulting economic collapse of America will be followed by its political and social collapse. Warfare and partition will ensue. The United States of America will cease to exist.

    So, proud Democrat, you will have nothing of which to be proud.

    8. With the loss of its principal export market and the main driver of its economic expansion, China will be very seriously affected. Its $1.1tn US Treasury Bonds will be worthless, as will its other USD holdings. The whole house of cards will collapse.

    So you will have to find somewhere safer to live. If, of course, you’re still alive.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  36. S says:

    ‘Political crisis’ in Eastern Europe, in Serbia, Poland, and now it appears Ukraine, with an aim of the reduction/destruction of Russia and the Russian people being a primary objective, has been the casus belli for WWI, WWII, and now, WWIII?

    Should they succeed in this endeavor, just as happened in WWII in regards to Poland, the interests of Ukraine and the Ukranian people will likely be quickly forgotten by the war’s perpetrators, and European peoples as a whole will continue to lose what little sovereignty they may have left.

    • Agree: Robjil
  37. Robjil says:
    @raga10

    you’re going to quote RT with a straight face ?!

    Yes, the US puppet regime can not say what is really happening in Ukraine. Russians are closely connected to Ukraine culturally and ancestrally. They have a feel what is going on there. They don’t blame the Ukrainians for this mess. They blame the puppet Masters.

    https://www.rt.com/russia/543419-ukraine-border-crisis-blame/

    A recent poll by Moscow’s Levada Center, registered as a ‘foreign agent’ by Moscow’s Ministry of Justice over ties to overseas funding, reveals who Russians blame for the escalation of the situation. A colossal 50% believe NATO is responsible, while only 16% blame Ukraine and 3% point the finger at the war-torn Donbass region. Another 4% believe that Russia is the culprit. Simply put, those inside the country consider the conflict over Ukraine to be a NATO war.

    If Ukraine kept those nukes Russians

    There were 15 republics. Should they all have nukes now? If they wanted nukes then they should have stayed with Russia. Should all 50 states have nukes if the US breaks up? Nukes are not parting gifts. If you leave a nation with nukes, the control point of nukes is the capitol, a break off nation should not get nukes as a parting gift.

    Crimea was a friendship gift to Ukraine from the Russian USSR in 1954. The friendship ended in 2014, when the US empire took over Ukraine. So the gift went home to Russia again. The people of Crimea were not able to vote in 1954 about the friendship gift. In 2014, they were able to vote. Real democracy was at work here. The US empire does not like democracy if it works against its goals of world domination.

    • Agree: Mulga Mumblebrain
    • Replies: @raga10
  38. @Verymuchalive

    Your #6 cease to exist could take years to unfold. It’s that long drawn out dying that will allow totalitarianism to flourish for quite some time.

    The best option for the people is to front run the controllers plans. They aren’t ready with all their CBDC and other schemes yet, so pulling their house of cards down now will cause them to have fewer controls in place when the economic SHTF. The whole covid nonsense via the mandates, etc would get pushed aside in an instant if the population just decided to not go to work for a month or two.

    The only power the people have is their labor. If they withhold their labor, everything stops and power returns to where it belongs.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  39. Fr. John says:
    @Phibbs

    “Russian Christians are aware that the Jewish-Bolshevist Revolution of 1917, which resulted in the murders of millions of Russian Christians, was a Jewish revolution. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn stated, the Jews who took over Russia in 1917 hated Russians, Russian culture, Russian history, the Tsar and Christianity. (The Jewish publishing companies banned Solzhenitsyn’s book outlining the Jewish Communist revolution.) ”

    Orthodoxy (unlike Catholi-schism) understands the Deicide’s satanic mindset (and Yes, it is nothing, if not satanic!) and has the benefit of seventy YEARS of Bolshevikist/Jewish terror, blood-letting, and an entire people’s suffering, to use as calling cards…or as a flush in international poker…

    Some IDIOTS may pooh-pooh this, but at least Mr. Unz allows comments like mine to surface, from time to time. I’ll end with some pertinent quotes, for the historical record.

    Oh, and RUSSIA would be TOTALLY JUSTIFIED if she bombed D.C. TOTALLY. Just use a concentrated nuke, that won’t give us eternal winter over the whole East Coast, Spasiba. Gospodiye, Pomiluye…

    “The Baal religion of the ancient world was a sexual fertility cult which compelled people to commit fornication, and its purveyors were the Canaanites, who are indeed the antecedents of today’s Arabs and Jews.”- quoted in https://christogenea.org/podcasts/unpardonable-sin

    “This is the nationalism advocated by this writer and Orthodox nationalism in general. It implies that nations have every right to protect their borders and ethnic integrity. Nations are creations of God as families are.” – Dr. M. R. Johnson, https://www.rusjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Race_Orthodoxy-1.pdf

    “Communism and internationalism are in truth and in fact great virtues. Judaism may be justly proud of these virtues”
    Harry Watan, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites (New York: Committee for the Preservation of the Jews, 1939), p. 80

    “If the tide of history does not turn toward Communist internationalism … then the Jewish race is doomed.”
    George Marlen, Stalin, Trotsky, or Lenin (New York, 1937), p. 414

    “The [Jewish] Commissaries were formerly political exiles. They had been dreaming of revolution for years in their exile in Paris, in London, in New York, in Berlin, everywhere and anywhere. They saw in the Bolshevist Movement an opportunity of realizing the extreme ideas of Communism and internationalism to which their fate had compelled them.”
    Dr. D. S. Pazmanik, in The Jewish Chronicle (London), September 5, 1919, p. 14

    “Some call it Marxism – I call it Judaism.”
    Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, in the American Bulletin of May 15, 1935

    “The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution”
    The Maccabean (New York), Nov. 1905, p, 250

    “Jewry is the mother of Marxism.”
    Le Droit de Vivre, May 12, 1936

  40. Hunsdon says:
    @raga10

    Crimea was, and is, home to the Russian Black Sea fleet. Russia had a lease on Crimea through 2017, extended through 2042 through the Kharkiv Pact. In 2014 I saw some US triumphalist talk about turning Crimea into a NATO base. Right, wrong, good, bad, or indifferent, no nation-state will give up its primary naval base. (If the reconquista takes place and the southwest of America falls to Mexico, San Diego will be a notable exception.)

    This is anecdotal evidence, but the worst prejudice I have ever personally encountered was in Kiev. I was working in an (unnamed Central Asian country) in the late 1990s, and attended a wedding in Kiev for the boss of my girlfriend at the time. My girlfriend was ethnically Russian. While in Kiev, numerous people pretended that they could not understand her Russian, while they could understand me just fine. My Russian is not bad, but Elizabeta’s was far, far better.

    • Replies: @raga10
    , @Mulga Mumblebrain
  41. Petermx says:
    @Miro23

    https://dailystormer.in/russia-says-moment-of-truth-has-come/

    It is hard to believe these nutcases would actually let Europe get into another war but maybe they would. The current limp wristed leadership of France and Germany apparently are alright with another war on European soil. As the biggest economies in Europe, these two countries were supposed to speak for Europe but I don’t hear anything from them. Maybe they are alright with Europe being demolished again. But I think if war can be avoided for a while, 2022 or 2023 at the latest will be a decisive year. Inflation is rising everywhere but especially the USA and the USA is going to have its hands full with major economic problems and perhaps a dollar in freefall.

    If Russia can postpone the conflict they might get more gratification from seeing such a major economic decline of their former Cold War rival, a decline the USA won’t recover from for many years, if ever.

    • Agree: Miro23, nokangaroos
    • Replies: @Miro23
  42. @RoatanBill

    You are right. Nobody knows how long the collapse will take to happen. But happen it will. The Hostile Elite can only postpone the inevitable.

  43. Anonymous[178] • Disclaimer says:
    @Supply and Demand

    Your act is really struggling to get over.

    • Agree: bombthe3gorgesdam
  44. raga10 says:
    @Robjil

    If you leave a nation with nukes, the control point of nukes is the capitol, a break off nation should not get nukes as a parting gift.

    I don’t disagree with that in principle, but principles are one thing and reality on the ground is another. Ukraine had them in their hands and gave them up, that’s all I’m saying.

    In this conflict I am neither pro-Russian or pro-American (I’m pro-European) but I’m consistent in my belief that nuclear weapons are an effective equaliser against much larger adversaries and smaller countries have every right not to be pushed around – whether it’s North Korea against US, or Australia against China, or Ukraine against Russia.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  45. Miro23 says:
    @Petermx

    But I think if war can be avoided for a while, 2022 or 2023 at the latest will be a decisive year. Inflation is rising everywhere but especially the USA and the USA is going to have its hands full with major economic problems and perhaps a dollar in freefall.

    This could be precisely the reason that the ZoGlob want the war now – or at least a major war somewhere. Taiwan/ China could be an alternative. They need explicit Emergency (totalitarian) control of the US before things fall apart.

  46. raga10 says:
    @Hunsdon

    Right, wrong, good, bad, or indifferent, no nation-state will give up its primary naval base.

    Yeah, that’s at leaast more honest than claiming that taking over Crimea was democracy at work.
    Although Russia has direct access to the Black Sea even without Crimea and they already have another naval base there (at Novorossiysk) so it’s not a very solid argument.

    • Disagree: Petermx
  47. @Corvinus

    it’s not down. Jewgool, if that’s your browser, is just running an informal block by making it hard to get to. Just randomly keep fast-clicking the counterclockwise flowing circle until the “timed out” page comes up, then resume doing so until it goes clockwise…site will then come up. (((They) are currently trying to censor a lot of hardRight sites by doing this….VoxDay, Daily Stormer, etc.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  48. Robjil says:
    @raga10

    Ukraine against Russia.

    Ukraine was never a nation before 1991. It is a patchwork of regions cobbled together in the Soviet times. To be given nukes in 1991, as an unsteady patchwork nation would not be a good thing for this planet. Obviously it was good choice to take them away from 1991 Ukraine. Look what happened in 2014, the US swooped in and took the nation with a coup. Its unsteadiness made it easy picking for the US to grab it.

    If it had nukes as an US puppet, the US could order its puppet to use nukes on Russia. The US would not care if there is damage. The US is thousands of miles away. Europe is quite close. Thus, it was very pro-European to keep nukes from Ukraine.

    Australia is a puppet state for US empire goals. It would not be a wise choice for nukes either. Look at the insane lock downs of the entire nation in the past 2 years. An insane puppet nation like that should not have nukes either.

    North Korea is a different story. Korea has been an distinct culture for centuries before the US was created. It protects itself from the US very well.

  49. raga10 says:

    Thus, it was very pro-European to keep nukes from Ukraine.

    In a sense, yes. From European perspective, it would make sense to let Russia do what it will in what used to be their territory anyway, as long as that keeps the peace in Europe (except, when did appeasing the aggressors ever stop them from wanting more?).
    But from Ukrainian perspective they would be safer against Russian military invasion if they had nukes; that’s just the objective fact.

    Australia is a puppet state for US empire goals.

    Has it ever occurred to you that the reason countries like Australia or Ukraine become so dependent on their protectors is precisely because they have no hope of defending themselves on their own? Perhaps Australia would develop something resembling independent foreign policy if it had the strength to back it up.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Showmethereal
  50. Robjil says:
    @raga10

    But from Ukrainian perspective

    Which Ukrainian perspective?

    The Russian speaking East or the Ukrainian speaking West.

    Ukraine and Russia could have been like Canada and the US.

    The US keeps interfering in Ukraine. It created the mess.

    Australia is quite far from China. It had no problems with China. China is not bothering Australia. MSM is creating something out of nothing. The Australians have much worst problem with the people who are running their government now.

    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/thousands-of-protesters-swarm-brisbane-melbourne-sydney-to-fight-vaccine-mandates/news-story/3b6bc6769016fd751c82265d822f639f

    Thousands of protesters have hit the streets in Melbourne to fight vaccination mandates and Covid-19 restrictions.
    Thousands of demonstrators took to the streets of Melbourne for four hours chanting to police “you serve us”, as another planned protest has begun in Queensland on Saturday, where up to 10,000 protesters reportedly marched in defiance pandemic policies.

    • Replies: @raga10
    , @Mulga Mumblebrain
  51. raga10 says:
    @Robjil

    Ukraine and Russia could have been like Canada and the US.

    Sure… if Russia didn’t annex the fledgling state of Ukraine in the early 20’s, then repressed and starved millions of them so that by the time WWII came along many Ukrainians were more pro-Nazi than pro-Soviet, then subject them to another round of repressions after the war…

    Say what you will about the US, but their relationship with Canada was never quite this “complicated”.

  52. As soon as the Quisling drunk Yeltsin broke up the USSR on orders from Thanatopolis DC, and the fascist scum from Ukrainian, Belarusian and Baltic emigre’ communities flocked back in to those ‘countries’, WW3 was inevitable. Even if Putin had been a new Yeltsin, at some time Russia would have produced a leader who refused to sit back as the greatest force for Evil in history, the USA, set to breaking Russia apart and looting it. The creatures in Thanatopia DC are emanations straight from Hell, with the stink of sulphur on them, as Hugo Chavez noted. Any war in Ukraine would be a Russian cake-walk, and, hopefully Russia will take out Norwegian oil and gas wells and turn off Nordstream 2 and other pipelines, so the Euros can freeze their tits off, in tribute to the Glorious West. If it goes nuclear, well the Euros will at least keep warm, for a few micro-seconds.

  53. @Robjil

    In every country the USA supports only the most vicious, corrupt and violent Rightists. The NED only supports the hard Right, the CIA only subverts non-Rightist governments etc. The USA prefers fascists and sub-fascists because the USA itself is a fascist regime, as all the symbols of fasces spread throughout the Capitol building show. Corporate control plus State power-that is the US oligarchy.

    • Agree: Robjil
  54. @Hunsdon

    The Soviet lost thirty million in WW2, then saw the USA immediately begin planning for nuclear attacks on all major Soviet population centres. Putin made a mistake in 2014 in not realising that for the USA and its stooges and the Ukronazis WW2 had never finished, and not marching on Kiev and killing every Ukronazi he could get his hands on. The cancer has only worsened since. Now excision is absolutely unavoidable, and if we avoid thermo-nuclear war it will be a miracle.

    • Replies: @Petermx
  55. Zorost says:
    @American Citizen

    It’s weird how so many “American” “journalists” who hate Russia have a part of their ‘early life’ that says their ancestors fled either Soviet Russia or Tsarist Russia due to being persecuted for absolutely no reason.

  56. @Old Brown Fool

    President Putin does this all this to what purpose – to convince the future generations that Russia played by the rules?

    I’m beginning to think that Putin and those around him have finally come to understand the Satanic nature of their deadly implacable enemies in the West. They now realize that war is unavoidable, so they’re establishing the moral foundation for a first strike against those who seek to destroy Russia.

    • Agree: Old Brown Fool
    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  57. Petermx says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    That’s highly debatable. As we know from the holocaust lies about skin, fat, soap and lampshades and the reduction of the claimed death toll at Auschwitz from 4 million to 1 million in the early 1990’s, Germany’s former enemies have no qualms about making outrageous claims and lies, and while Germany was the most demolished nation of all the combatants their losses are never discussed and their losses were supposedly less than many others. Some people think the Germans loss few people in the war and that is because most of what is said about the war are allied lies. The mass murder by the glorious allies continued after the war ended.

    Whatever number of Soviets died (David Irving wrote that Stalin told Churchill it was 5 million) you have to first figure out how did they die or who killed them. How many Ukrainians, Latvians, Estonians and others allied with the Germans were killed by the Soviets? These were Soviet citizens killed by the USSR. How many Russian civilians were killed by Red Army for cooperating with the Germans? The Soviet Union was a brutal place to live and that was why so many Soviets welcomed the supposedly “evil NAZIS” and were glad they came. That right there blows a hole a mile wide in the outrageous lies against the Germans, because while many Soviets welcomed the Germans as liberators from the Judeo-Bolshevik mass murdering regime they lived under, no Germans welcomed the brutal Soviets or their western allies when they entered Germany. It is also of interest how many people died from enemy fire and how many died of starvation, disease or other causes. Tens of millions of Soviets also died in the 1930’s at the hands of their own government when there was no war!

    This is a review of a new book from the Norwegian academic Johannes Due Enstad. Eastern European authors are writing similar books. Many Russians hoped that Hitler would free them from Stalin. This says the allies were the evil side. Why did the British and Americans ally themselves with a regime that murdered millions of its own so that many of those that survived welcomed the German soldier?

    https://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/english/research/news-and-events/news/2018/many-russians-hoped-that-hitler-would-free-them-fr.html

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  58. @Petermx

    Dear me, you fascists are STILL smarting over getting beaten. I well remember dealings with fascist emigres in Sydney, Balts mostly, and what utterly nassty bastards they were. The Right called them, ‘Captive Nations’. As we can see from the fascist, racist, Sinophobe pipsqueak regime in Lithuania, these swine have not changed one iota.

  59. @Harold Smith

    ANYONE, anywhere on Earth, who can read and understand knows for a fact that the USA is the greatest force for Evil in history, having inherited the title from the UK.

  60. Petermx says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    You’ve been listening to your own lies for too long. You communist mass murderers made your own people welcome the fascists who opened their churches and gave them their lives back. They even joined ranks with the fascists to fight you. You are the backwards, nasty bastards and dirty gang rapists.

    • Troll: Mulga Mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  61. Corvinus says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Lol, you hate Jews but love their buxom women. Hypocrite. And interesting you mention Vox Day, as you’ve been banned from his (and other) sites for your shake oil sales pitch.

  62. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    The Baltics are still not as bad as Poland – Estonia esp. gives the joo the
    finger from time to time (I loved the “our gas is better” commercial 😛 ).
    Having your hand in Germany´s pocket while pissing in Mother Russia´s kascha,
    all from behind the hem of USrael´s skirt, would be subpar policy if you´re located in Central Africa; where they are it is suicidal. They should be more preoccupied with reviving the Hanse (including St. Petersburg).

    Peter cannot be faulted on the facts; that some of us know more history –
    for reasons that you do not wish to replicate – is not an argument.
    But as long as we keep attacking the mantilla – instead of recognizing the
    communis hostis omnium holding it – nothing will change.

    (Oh, and my kulak and pre-Nazi forbears piss on your whore and chicken thief ones too)

  63. @Petermx

    Some Ukros and Balts fought for the Nazis, some for the Soviet. The fascists who fought the Soviet were enthusiastic Jew-killers, and Pole-killers, and definitely Russian-killers. In their viciousness they even shocked the Germans. Your kinda people, eh.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    , @Petermx
  64. @Bill

    It will take a big economic calamity for the US forces to leave Germany.

  65. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    The “Latvian Bayonets” had done the dirty work of the October Revolution
    but were decimated by Bronstein when they demanded what they had been
    promised (cf. Shays´Rebellion 😛 ). There was only one major escape attempt
    from Auschwitz because the inmates were more scared of the Poles outside
    than of the Totenkopfverbände. At least two of the “enthusiasts” on
    the German side – Rodionow (recte Gil) and probably Kaminski – were Jews.
    Certain … exuberances when the Battaillon Nachtigall took Lemberg?
    Well, some people flip when they take the NKVD prison only to find themselves
    knee-deep in the still warm bodies of their friends.

    All that was more about settling scores – and unfortunately there was a shitload of
    them – than about some lofty ideals.

  66. Petermx says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    If the supposed victims you cite were not such bald faced liars they would have more credibility. Soap from fat, lampshades from skin and lying about the death toll at Auschwitz for 40 years until they reduced the claimed dead by 3 million. The 80 – 85 % Jewish run Soviet Union killed millions Russians, Ukrainians and others. Your kinda people, eh.

  67. N30rebel says:
    @Phibbs

    Jews? Be more specific, try Zionists.

  68. @Jim Christian

    Strange. I work with a white man who is a former Texan and unabashed Republic who hates Russians…. He does think the US should let Russia have Crimea.. But he hates Russians. He used to compete in sport and said those were the only people he hated. Go figure.

  69. @American Citizen

    So Regean and the two Bushes were friends of Russia?? John Mccain was a friend of Russia? All of them are white republicans. Help me out here.

  70. @raga10

    Help me understand the European perspective… How does continuing to expand NATO closer and closer and closer to Russia ease tensions….???? Almost any neutral person from another region (not including the US and Canada since they are in NATO) would see that as a provocation against Russia. Likewise – how could anyone not see the US sponsored coup in 2014 wouldnt cause Russia to take action… Or bolstering Georgia a few years earlier to make a dumb move…. I just cannot see how that is seen as good for Europe… Help me.

    • Replies: @raga10
  71. Anonymous[395] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    I’m sure your female relatives aren’t having quite the difficulty you are with the “racist Sinophobes” in Australia, Mulga.

  72. raga10 says:
    @Showmethereal

    I just cannot see how that is seen as good for Europe… Help me.

    It’s very simple – expanding NATO to include Ukraine is not good for Europe; if it happens it would be thanks to American influence. For Europe it would be perfectly fine to include Ukraine economically, eventually perhaps folding it into Schengen Area, without expanding militarily. That’s why I say that in this conflict I am specifically pro-European rather than pro-NATO. It’s not the same thing.

    Mind you, Russia is not helping here. Making demands regarding exclusion of Ukraine does impinge on sovereignty of other countries because it really is not up to Russia to dictate to anyone else what agreements they can or cannot enter between each other. Making such demands only goads them into digging in – it’s almost as if Russia *wanted* this confrontation, eh?

  73. raga10 says:
    @raga10

    expanding NATO to include Ukraine is not good for Europe

    To add to my previous post: far from entertaining “lunatic expansion plans” NATO has been remarkably reluctant to include Ukraine so far. If NATO wanted this to happen, it would’ve happened long time ago but it hasn’t, precisely because even if Americans would be in favour, European members are not actually interested in messing with Russia – subject of Ukraine’s membership only tends to come up when Ukraine is physically threatened.

    Which is why it is quite remarkable that Russia keeps prodding and provoking Ukraine. It’s Russia who wants NATO to expand into Ukraine so they can claim being endangered.

    • Disagree: Tjoe
  74. @raga10

    You miss the point. NATO leaders lied and said they would not expand. Since the 1990’s it has not stopped. The difference is Russia was in turmoil and so could do nothing about it. Putin was pro Europe… Until NATO kept encroaching more and more and more and more…

    To your second point comment.. And if you are really pro Europe – then why did Europe not push back against the US backed coup in 2014 when Nuland was recorded as saying F-U to the EU..??? The EU is obviously scared of the US or supports it. An anti Russia government was installed in Ukraine. If thats not starting trouble then I dont know what is..

  75. raga10 says:

    You miss the point. NATO leaders lied and said they would not expand. Since the 1990’s it has not stopped.

    The point is that NATO could’ve included Ukraine more easily back in the 90’s when Russia was on its knees – but it didn’t.

    An anti Russia government was installed in Ukraine. If thats not starting trouble then I dont know what is..

    What that is, is an internal Ukrainian matter. There is no law saying that Ukrainian governments must be pro-Russian. In any case Ukraine, pro- or against- Russian is not exactly a threat to Russia due to their difference in size and power.

    • Replies: @Showmethereal
  76. Anonymous[693] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Actually, the Jews are in your bed, buggering the literal shit out of you, something I’m sure your disgusting, cuck ass quite enjoys.

  77. @raga10

    NATO expansion is about more than Ukraine…. It expanded far more after saying it wouldnt already.

    Ukraine coup cannot be an internal matger when the master of NATO engineered the coup and installed who they wanted and were exposed to the whole world to have done so and stated blankly you Europeans get a middle finger.

    Next you will say the US outed spying on all European leaders is an internal matger for each country. Sure… until the whole world saw it and it makes Europeans a lughing stock because they are afraid to talk back to the US. If it was Russia you would have expelled all Russian diplomats.

    • Replies: @raga10
  78. raga10 says:
    @Showmethereal

    Ukraine coup cannot be an internal matger when the master of NATO engineered the coup and installed who they wanted and were exposed to the whole world to have done so and stated blankly you Europeans get a middle finger.

    America does have perhaps disproportional influence in affairs of NATO and your concern for our equality is touching, but that is none of Russia’s business either. I repeat, Russia is not entitled to having only pro-Russian governments on their borders. Ukraine is not a danger to Russia on its own, and if it could allow NATO’s troops or missiles on their soil – well, it can do that at any time whether it is a member of NATO or not. If Russia doesn’t want that, the best it could do is leave Ukraine alone.

    The fact is, almost all NATO countries see Ukraine as a liability rather than opportunity and they don’t need this hassle. Have you ever actually been to Europe? Do you really think that countries like Denmark, Netherlands, Italy, Greece or even Germany would want another war with Russia? They’ve gone all soft, their colonial days are long over and all they want is to be left alone.

    In any case, so Russians might have an unfriendly nation on their border? Well, cry me a fucking river! We had pro-Russian countries that could and did allow Russian troops and bases on their soil right on our borders for decades and not once did Russia consider this is perhaps unfair for us. The only difference is that those countries really did belong to the Warsaw Pact, while Ukraine is in NATO only in Russian paranoid delusions thus far.

    (yes, I do consider current Russia to be little more than continuation of Soviet Union under a different name)

  79. Anonymous[125] • Disclaimer says:
    @raga10

    Russia is not helping here. Making demands regarding exclusion of Ukraine does impinge on sovereignty of other countries because it really is not up to Russia to dictate to anyone else what agreements they can or cannot enter between each other.

    Are all jewish shills here retarded? It’s like you don’t even know about the Cuban Missile Crisis or the reasons for the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (which was killed by the US relatively recently).

    Placing nukes in Ukraine cuts their travel time to Moscow to 7 minutes – 5 when (not if) they become hypersonic. The jews in charge of NATO are obviously positioning it for a Nuclear First Strike against Russia (and China, probably). That’s why the INF treaty, and the Open Skies treaty are dead and why the NATO is ignoring its rule to not bring in countries in conflict. It’s also the reason for China’s frantic race to create its own MAD capability.

    So yes – Russia is making demands for deescalation because their other two options are to sit and wait for annihilation or get very, very proactive. Both of those are likely to kill all of us and end the world – and no, not “the world as we know it” – they can make every nuke in their possession count if faced with extinction.

    Meanwhile, a swarthy jew here is framing it like Russia is unreasonably interfering in Ukraine’s sovereign right to have tranny toilets with their newfound democracy.

    • Agree: Harold Smith
    • Replies: @raga10
  80. raga10 says:
    @Anonymous

    So yes – Russia is making demands for deescalation because their other two options are to sit and wait for annihilation or get very, very proactive.

    Russia is making demands designed to be rejected and if you can’t see that you’re blinded by their propaganda or you are on their payroll. And speaking of hypersonic missiles, who developed them first and who is playing catch up now? The answer is that Russia has them already and US is now playing catch-up.

    Russia is unreasonably interfering in Ukraine’s sovereign right to have tranny toilets with their newfound democracy.

    That is exactly what Russia is doing.

    And once again: yours is the only side taking about placing nukes in Ukraine. NATO doesn’t even want to place nukes in Poland, let alone in Ukraine.

    • Troll: Mulga Mumblebrain
  81. @raga10

    At least thermo-nuclear war would extirpate vermin like this from the cosmos.

  82. Tjoe says:

    Wow….I really think this author sucks.

  83. Tjoe says:

    Hillary murdered 3000 of her countrymen (NY Senator). They promised HER the presidency and failed twice. Imagine doing such TREASON and not getting paid.

  84. @raga10

    “I repeat, Russia is not entitled to having only pro-Russian governments on their borders. Ukraine is not a danger to Russia on its own, and if it could allow NATO’s troops or missiles on their soil – well, it can do that at any time whether it is a member of NATO or not. If Russia doesn’t want that, the best it could do is leave Ukraine alone.”

    NATO marks Russia as an enemy. To allow NATO weapons makes you an enemy of Russia. That goes for the Baltics as well as Ukraine. It is really not a difficult concept. I see others have tried to explain the same thing to you but it’s not working… so never mind.

    • Replies: @raga10
  85. raga10 says:
    @showmethereal

    That goes for the Baltics as well as Ukraine. It is really not a difficult concept.

    What I’m trying to explain to you is not a difficult concept and I can’t see why it isn’t sinking in either: NATO, with exception of US and perhaps UK, has no appetite for a fight. If you don’t want a fight, then don’t force it into position where it has to act. The same goes for Russian relations with Ukraine: No matter who is in charge over there, you are much larger and stronger than they are – if you don’t want Ukraine to turn somewhere else for protection, then quit poking it with a stick.

    • Replies: @Begemot
  86. Begemot says:
    @raga10

    What kind of poking of Ukraine by Russia occurred between 1991 and 2013?

  87. Mr Black says:
    @gottlieb

    “The Russian beer”, “The Great White Shark” Why do Russians supporters talk like they’re 7 yrs old?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism