The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewThe Saker Archive
The Neocons Are Pushing the USA and the Rest of the World Towards a Dangerous Crisis
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

First, my writing on the wall

In October of last year a wrote an analysis I entitled The USA are about to face the worst crisis of their history and how Putin’s example might inspire Trump and I think that this is a good time to revisit it now. I began the analysis by looking at the calamities which would befall the United States if Hillary was elected. Since this did not happen (thank God!), we can safely ignore that part and look at my prediction of what would happen if Trump was elected. Here is what I wrote:

Trump wins. Problem: he will be completely alone. The Neocons have a total, repeat total, control of the Congress, the media, banking and finance, and the courts. From Clinton to Clinton they have deeply infiltrated the Pentagon, Foggy Bottom, and the three letter agencies. The Fed is their stronghold. How in the world will Trump deal with these rabid “crazies in the basement“? Consider the vicious hate campaign which all these “personalities” (from actors, to politicians to reporters) have unleashed against Trump – they have burned their bridges, they know that they will lose it all if Trump wins (and, if he proves to be an easy pushover his election will make no difference anyway). The Neocons have nothing to lose and they will fight to the very last one. What could Trump possibly do to get anything done if he is surrounded by Neocons and their agents of influence? Bring in an entirely different team? How is he going to vet them? His first choice was to take Pence as a VP – a disaster (he is already sabotaging Trump on Syria and the elections outcome). I *dread* the hear whom Trump will appoint as a White House Chief of Staff as I am afraid that just to appease the Neocons he will appoint some new version of the infamous Rahm Emanuel… And should Trump prove that he has both principles and courage, the Neocons can always “Dallas” him and replace him with Pence. Et voilà!

I went on to suggest that Trump’s only option would be to follow Putin’s example and do the the Neocons what Putin did to the oligarchs. Clearly that did not happen. In fact, one month after the election of Trump I wrote another analysis entitled “The Neocons and the “deep state” have neutered the Trump Presidency, it’s over folks!“.

Less than a month ago I warned that a ‘color revolution ‘ was taking place in the USA. My first element of proof was the so-called “investigation” which the CIA, FBI, NSA and others were conducting against President Trump’s candidate to become National Security Advisor, General Flynn. Tonight, the plot to get rid of Flynn has finally succeeded and General Flynn had to offer his resignation. Trump accepted it. Now let’s immediately get one thing out of the way: Flynn was hardly a saint or a perfect wise man who would single handedly saved the world. That he was not. However, what Flynn was is the cornerstone of Trump’s national security policy. (…) The Neocon run ‘deep state’ has now forced Flynn to resign under the idiotic pretext that he had a telephone conversation, on an open, insecure and clearly monitored, line with the Russian ambassador. And Trump accepted this resignation. Ever since Trump made it to the White House, he has taken blow after blow from the Neocon-run Ziomedia, from Congress, from all the Hollywood doubleplusgoodthinking “stars” and even from European politicians. And Trump took each blow without ever fighting back. Nowhere was his famous “you are fired!” to be seen. But I still had hope. I wanted to hope. I felt that it was my duty to hope. But now Trump has betrayed us all. Again, Flynn was not my hero. But he was, by all accounts, Trump’s hero. And Trump betrayed him. The consequences of this will be immense. For one thing, Trump is now clearly broken. It took the ‘deep state’ only weeks to castrate Trump and to make him bow to the powers that be. Those who would have stood behind Trump will now feel that he will not stand behind them and they will all move back away from him. The Neocons will feel elated by the elimination of their worst enemy and emboldened by this victory they will push on, doubling-down over and over and over again. It’s over, folks, the deep state has won.

I then concluded that the consequences of this victory would catastrophic for the United States:

In their hate-filled rage against Trump and the American people (aka “the basket of deplorables”) the Neocons have had to show their true face. By their rejection of the outcome of the elections, by their riots, their demonization of Trump, the Neocons have shown two crucial things: first, that the US democracy is a sad joke and that they, the Neocons, are an occupation regime which rules against the will of the American people. In other words, just like Israel, the USA has no legitimacy left. And since, just like Israel, the USA are unable to frighten their enemies, they are basically left with nothing, no legitimacy, no ability to coerce. So yes, the Neocons have won. But their victory is removes the last chance for the US to avoid a collapse.

I think that what we are seeing today are the first signs of the impending collapse.

The symptoms of the agony

  • Externally, the US foreign policy is basically “frozen” and in lieu of a foreign policy we now only have a long series of empty threats hurled at a list of demonized countries which are now promised “fire and brimstone” should they dare to disobey Uncle Sam. While this makes for good headlines, this does not qualify as a “policy” of any kind (I discussed this issue at length during my recent interview with SouthFront). And then there is Congress which has basically stripped Trump from his powers to conduct foreign policy. This bizarre, and illegal, form of a “vote of no-confidence” further hammers in the message that Trump is either a madman, a traitor, or both.
  • Internally, the latest riots in Charlottesville now being blamed on Trump who, after being a Putin agent is now further demonized as some kind of Nazi (see Paul Craig Roberts’ first and second warnings about this dynamic)
  • Organizationally, it is clear that Trump is surrounded by enemies as illustrated by the absolutely outrageous fact that he can’t even talk to a foreign head of state without having the transcript of his conversation leaked to the Ziomedia.

I believe that these all are preparatory steps to trigger a major crisis and use it to remove Trump, either by a process of impeachment, or by force under the pretext of some crisis. Just look at the message which the Ziomedia has been hammeing into the brains of the US population.

The psychological preparation for the forthcoming coup: scaring them all to death

Here are three very telling examples taken from Newsweek’s front page:

PutinCovers

Ask yourself, what is the message here?

Trump is a traitor, he works for Putin, Putin wants to destroy democracy in the United States and these two men together are the most dangerous men on the planet. This is a “plot against America“, no less!

Not bad, right?

ORDER IT NOW

“They” are clearly out there go get “us” and “we” are all in terrible danger: Kim Jong-un is about to declare nuclear war on the US, Xi and Putin are threatening the world with their armies, and “our” own President came to power courtesy of the “Russian KGB” and “Putin’s hackers”, he now works for the Russians, he is also clearly a Nazi, a White supremacist, a racist and, possibly, a “new Hitler” (as is Putin, of course!).

And then, there are those truly scary Mooslims and Aye-rabs who apparently want only two things in life: destroy “our way of life” and kill all the “infidels”. This is why we need the TSA, 16 intelligence agencies and militarized police SWAT teams everywhere: in case the terrorists come to get us where we live.

Dangerous international consequences

This would all be rather funny if it was not also extremely dangerous. For one thing, the US is really poking at a dangerous foe when it constantly tries to scare Kim Jong-un and the DPRK leadership. No, not because of the North Korean nukes (which are probably not real nuclear capable ICBMs but a not necessarily compatible combination of nuclear ‘devices’ and intermediate range ballistic missiles) but because of the huge and hard to destroy conventional North Korean military. The real threat are not missiles, but a deadly combination of conventional artillery and special forces which present very little danger to the US or the US military, but which present a huge threat for the population of Seoul and the northern section of South Korea. Nukes, in whatever form, are really only an added problem, a toxic “icing” on an already very dangerous ‘conventional cake’.

[Sidebar - a real life nightmare: Now, if you *really* want to terrify yourself and stay awake all night then consider the following. While I personally believe that Kim Jong-un is not insane and that the main objective of the North Korean leadership is to avoid a war at all costs, what if I am wrong? What if those who say that the North Korean leaders are totally insane are right? Or, which I think is much more likely, what if Kim Jong-un and the North Korean leaders came to the conclusion that they have nothing to lose, that the Americans are going to kill them all, along with their families and friends? What could they, in theory, do if truly desperate? Well, let me tell you: forget about Guam; think Tokyo! Indeed, while the DPRK could devastate Seoul with old fashioned artillery systems, DPRK missiles are probably capable of striking Tokyo or the Keihanshin region encompassing Kyoto, Osaka and Kobe including the key industries of the Hanshin Industrial Region. The Greater Tokyo area (Kanto region) and the Keihanshin region are very densely populated (37 and 20 million people respectively) and contain an immense number of industries, many of which would produce an ecological disaster of immense proportions if hit by missiles. Not only that, but a strike on the key economic and financial nodes of Japan would probably result in a 9-11 kind of international economic collapse. So if the North Koreans wanted to really, really hurt the Americans what they could do is strike Seoul, and key cities in Japan resulting in a huge political crisis for the entire planet. During the Cold War we used to study the consequences of a Soviet strike against Japan and the conclusion was always the same: Japan cannot afford a war of any kind. The Japanese landmass is too small, too densely populated, to rich in lucrative targets and a war lay waste to the entire country. This is still true today, only more so. And just imagine the reaction in South Korea and Japan if some crazy US strike on the DPRK results in Seoul and Tokyo being hit by missiles! The South Koreans have already made their position unambiguously clear, by the way. As for the Japanese, they are officially placing their hopes in missiles (as if technology could mitigate the consequences of insanity!). So yeah, the DPRK is plenty dangerous and pushing them into their last resort is totally irresponsible indeed, nukes or no nukes]

What we are observing now is positive feedback loop in which each move by the Neocons results in a deeper and deeper destabilization of the entire system. Needless to say, this is extremely dangerous and can only result in an eventual catastrophe/collapse. In fact, the signs that the US is totally losing control are already all over the place, here are just a few headlines to illustrate this:

A French expression goes “when the cat is gone, the mice dance“, and this is exactly what is happening now: the US is both very weak and basically absent. As for the Armenians, they say “The mouse dreams dreams that would terrify the cat”. Well, the “mice” of the world are dancing and dreaming and simply ignoring the “cat”. Every move the cat makes only makes things worse for him. The world is moving on, while the cat is busy destroying himself.

Dangerous domestic consequences

First on my list would be race riots. In fact, they are already happening all over the United States, but they are rarely presented as such. And I am not talking about the “official” riots of Black Lives Matter, which are bad enough, I am talking about the many mini-riots which the official media is systematically trying to obfuscate. Those interested in this topic should read the book Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry by Colin Flaherty which shows that racist attack on Whites by Blacks (aka “polar bear hunting”) are on the rise pretty much all over the county. Likewise, to anybody who stubbornly persists in ignoring the strong correlation between race and crime ought to read Ron Unz’s seminal analysis Race and Crime in America. Now, before some self-appointed thought police volunteer accuses me as a racist, I am not saying anything at all about the causes of the racial problems in the United States. I am only saying that racial violence in the US is severe and rapidly getting much worse.

The second problem which I see threatening the US society is an extremely rapid delegitimization of the entire US political system and, especially, of the Federal government. For decades now Americans have been voting for ‘A’ and each time what they ended up with is ‘not-A’. Examples of that include the famous “read my lips, no new taxes”, of course, but also Obama promises to stop stupid wars and now Trump’s promise to “drain the swamp”. Americans have been lied to for decades and they know it. There is a widening chasm between the so-called “American values” taught in schools and the reality of power. While officially the US is supposed to stand for democracy, freedom and all the other good things advocated by the Founding Fathers, the disgusting reality is that the US is in bed with Wahabis, Nazis and Zionists. The all-prevailing hypocrisy of it all now threatens to bring down the entire US political system just as the no less prevailing hypocrisy of the Soviet system brought down the USSR (if interested, you can read more about this topic here). The simple truth is that no regime can survive for too long when it proactively supports the exact opposite of what it officially is supposed to stand for. The result? I have yet to meet an adult American who would sincerely believe that he/she lives in the “land of the free and the home of the brave”. Maybe infants still buy this stuff, but even teenagers know that this is a load of bull.

Third, for all the encouraging statistics about the Dow Jones, unemployment and growth, the reality is that the US society is rapidly transforming itself in a three-tired one: on top, a small number of obscenely rich people, under them, a certain amount of qualified professionals who service the filthy rich and who struggle to maintain a lifestyle which in the past was associated with the middle-class. And then the vast majority of Americans who basically are looking at making “minimal wage plus a little something” and who basically survive by not paying for health insurance, by typically working two jobs, by eating cheap and unhealthy “prolefeed” and by giving up on that which every American worker could enjoy in the 1950s and 1960s (have one parent at home, have paid holidays, a second vacation home, etc.). Americans are mostly hard workers and, so far, most of them are surviving, but they are mostly one paycheck away from seriously bad poverty. A lot of them only make ends meet because they get help from their parents and grand-parents (the same is true of southern Europe, by the way). A large segment of the US population now survives only because of Walmart and the Dollar Store. Once that fails, food stamps are the last option. That, or jail, of course.

Combine all this and you get a potentially extremely explosive situation. No wonder that when so many Americans heard Hillary’s comment about the “basket of deplorables” they took that as declaration of war.

And how do the Neocons plan to deal with all this?

By cracking down on free speech and dissent, of course! What else?

Their only response – repression of course!

YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter – they are all cracking down on “bad” speech which includes pretty much any topic a garden variety self-described ‘liberal’ frowns upon. GoDaddy and Google are even going after domain names. Oh sure, nobody gets thrown in jail for, say, defending the 2nd Amendment, but they get “demonetized” and their accounts simply closed. It’s not the cops cracking down on free speech, it’s “Corporate America”, but the effect is the same. Apparently, the Neocons do not realize that censorship is not a viable strategy in the age of the Internet. Or maybe they do, and they are deliberately trying to trigger a backlash?

Then there is the vilification campaign in the media: unless you are some kind of ‘minority’ you are assumed to be nefarious by birth and guilty of all the evils on the planet. And your leader is Trump, of course, or maybe even Putin himself, vide supra. Christian heterosexual White males better run for cover…

Whatever may be the case, by their manic insistence, on one hand, to humiliate and crush Trump and, on the other, to repress millions of Americans the Neocons are committing a double mistake. First, they are showing their true face and, second, they are subverting the very institutions they are using to control and run this country. That, of course, only further weaken the Neocons and the United States themselves and that further accelerates the positive feedback loop mentioned above which now threatens the entire international system.

Us and Them

What makes the gradual collapse of the AngloZionist Empire so uniquely dangerous is that it is by far the biggest and most powerful empire in world history. No empire has ever had the quasi monopoly on power the USA enjoyed since WWII. By any measure, military, economic, political, social, the US came out of WWII as a giant and while there were ups and downs during the subsequent decades, the collapse of the USSR only reaffirmed what appeared to be the total victory of the United States. In my admittedly subjective opinion, the last competent (no, I did not say ‘good’, I said ‘competent’) US President was George Herbert Walker Bush who, unlike his successors, at least knew how to run an Empire. After that, it is all downhill, faster and faster. And if Obama was probably the most incompetent President in US history, Trump will be the first one to be openly lynched while in office. As a result, the AngloZionist Empire is now like a huge freight train which has lost its locomotive but still has an immense momentum pushing it forward even though there is nobody in control any more. The rest of the planet, with the irrelevant exception of the East Europeans, is now scrambling in horror to get out of the path of this out of control train. So far, the tracks (minimal common sense, political realities) are more or less holding, but a crash (political, economic or military) could happen at any moment. And that is very, very scary.

ORDER IT NOW

The US has anywhere between 700 to 1000 military bases worldwide, the entire international financial system is deeply enmeshed with the US economy, the US Dollar is still the only real reserve currency, United States Treasury securities are held by all the key international players (including Russia and China), SWIFT is politically controlled by the US, the US is the only country in the world that can print as much money as it wants and, last but not least, the US has a huge nuclear arsenal. As a result, a US collapse would threaten everybody and that means that nobody would want to trigger one. The collapse of the Soviet Union threatened the rest of mankind only in one way: by its nuclear arsenal. In contrast, any collapse of the United States would threaten everybody in many different ways.

So the real question now is this: can the rest of the planet prevent a catastrophic collapse of the AngloZionist Empire?

This is the irony of our situation: even though the entire planet is sick and tried of the incompetent arrogance of the AngloZionists, nobody out there wants their Empire to catastrophically collapse. And yet, with the Neocons in power, such a collapse appears inevitable with potentially devastating consequences for everybody.

This is really amazing, think of it: everybody hates the Neocons, not only a majority of the American people, but truly the entire planet. And yet that numerically small group of people has somehow managed to put everybody in danger, including themselves, due to their ugly vindictiveness, infinite arrogance and ideology-induced short-sightedness. That this could ever have happened, and at a planetary scale, is a dramatic testimony to the moral and spiritual decay of our civilization: how did we ever let things get that far?!

And the next obvious question: can we still stop them?

I honestly don’t know. I hope so, but I am not sure. My biggest hope with Trump was that he would be willing to sacrifice the Empire for the sake of the US (the opposite of what the Neocons are doing: they are willing to sacrifice the US for the sake of their Empire) and that he would manage a relatively safe and hopefully non-violent transition from Empire to “normal country” for the US. Clearly, this is ain’t happening. Instead, the Neocons are threatening everybody: the Chinese, the Russians, the North Koreans and the Venezuelans of course, but also the Europeans (economically), the entire Middle-East (via the “only democracy in the Middle-East”), all the developing countries and even the American people. Heck, they are even threatening the US President himself, and in not-so-subtle ways!

So what’s next?

Truly, I don’t know. But my overwhelming sense is that Trump will be removed from office, either for “high crimes and misdemeanors” or for “medical reasons” (they will simply declare him insane and unfit to be the President). Seeing how weak and spineless Trump is, he might even be “convinced” to resign. I don’t see them simply murdering him simply because he is no Kennedy either. After that, Pence comes to power and it will all be presented like a wonderful event, a group-hug of the elites followed by an immediate and merciless crackdown on any form of political opposition or dissent which will immediately be labeled as racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, terrorist, etc. The evil hand of the “Russian KGB” (yes, I know, the KGB was dissolved in 1991) will be found everywhere, especially amongst US libertarians (who will probably the only ones with enough brains to understand what is taking place). The (pseudo-) “Left” will rejoice. Should this course of action result in an unexpected level or resistance, either regional or social, a 9-11 false flag followed by a war will the most likely scenario (why stray away from something which worked so well the first time around?!). Unless the US decides to re-invade Grenada or give Nauru a much deserved thrashing, any more or less real war will result in a catastrophic failure for the US at which point the use of nukes by the Neocon crazies might become a very real risk, especially if symbolic US targets such as aircraft carriers are hit (in 1991 when the US sent the 82nd AB to Iraq there was nothing standing between this light infantry force and the Iraqi armored divisions. Had the Iraqis attacked the plan was to use tactical nuclear weapons. Then this was all quickly forgotten).

There is a reason why the Neocons thrive in times of crisis: it allows them to hide behind the mayhem, especially when they are the ones who triggered the mayhem in the first place. This means that as long as the Neocons are anywhere near in power they will never, ever, allow peace to suddenly break out, lest the spotlight be suddenly shined directly upon them. Chaos, wars, crises – this is their natural habitat. Think of it as the by-product of their existence. Eventually, of course, they will be stopped and they will be defeated, like all their predecessors in history. But I shudder when I think of the price mankind will have to pay this time around.

This analysis was written for The Unz Review

 
Hide 113 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. CalDre says:

    This is all pre-planned. The thinning of the herd. About the distrust in the media, the politicians, the other institutions – if one bothers to look at the Protocols objectively, regardless of whether it is “Jews” or someone else behind the plan, it’s all coming true. All of it. Even the best crystal ball reader of the 18th Century could not have written a plot that so closely resembles the succeeding 200 years. This by itself proves, beyond any question, that this plot exists and has been ongoing for centuries.

    The Protocols even state that the slogan of the totalitarian global government will be “liberty, equality”. And that was the slogan of the Bolsheviks – who, incidentally, were largely Jews and largely funded by false Jew bankers, including the Warburgs and Rothschilds.

    In fact, part of the reason the disinformation about the Nazi alleged genocide is so prevalent is that this lie helps bury the Protocols in the dustbin of history. If you mention the Protocols, it must mean that you want all Jews dead, because the Nazis mentioned the Protocols and they wanted all Jews dead (wrong – they wanted all Jews out of Europe, much like Israel wants all Arabs out of Eretz Israel – only difference is, Israel is incapable of doing what it wants).

    No, the point of pointing out the Protocols is that you cannot fight an enemy you cannot even imagine exists. The way to defeat the Illuminati – whether ultimately it’s Blue bloods, the Jesuits, the Mafia, Jew bankers, global oligarchs, that sit at the cap of the power pyramid – is to expose them. There is no need to kill or even resettle anyone, it is only a matter of opposing the evil that sits atop that hierarchy – exposing them and subjecting them to the punishment they so richly deserve.

    But the Holohoax is an excellent propaganda device as it has been elevated into a Blinder. You simply associate something with the Holohoax, presented as the worst crime ever (even if true, it would not be, by a long shot), and the listener’s conditioning / Pavlovian response shuts down their mind; but instead of salivating, they become energetically enraged. Now that is a powerful form of control! and can be used to hide what would otherwise be the most obvious crimes.

    Read More
    • Agree: Druid, white noise
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The biggest slap in the face was on the Huff Post when Bannon was canned.

    Goy Bye.

    How arrogant can you get? It's like they can't contain themselves now.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /tsaker/the-neocons-are-pushing-the-usa-and-the-rest-of-the-world-towards-a-dangerous-crisis/#comment-1973415
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. This is really amazing, think of it: everybody hates the Neocons, not only a majority of the American people, but truly the entire planet. And yet that numerically small group of people has somehow managed to put everybody in danger, including themselves, due to their ugly vindictiveness, infinite arrogance and ideology-induced short-sightedness. That this could ever have happened, and at a planetary scale, is a dramatic testimony to the moral and spiritual decay of our civilization: how did we ever let things get that far?!

    And the next obvious question: can we still stop them?

    Stalin found a way to stop the prototype Neocon Leon Trotsky.

    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    Read More
    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    True enough. But then, Stalin had control of the party and the country. Alas! Trump does not.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. dearieme says:

    ‘A French expression goes “when the cat is gone, the mice dance“,

    Eh bien, the English expression is “When the cat’s away the mice will play”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. “The Neocons” is too vague. The people need an authoritative list with names, addresses and photographs.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WorkingClass
    Here is the closest thing to a list of names that google turned up:

    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?450257-The-Neoconservative-Reference-List
    , @white noise
    Yeah, and then publish the list in CNN, Fox, Washington Post, et al... Sure, tomorrow morning, they all will be happy to comply. They may even agree to start a massive vilification campaign against themselves.
    , @jacques sheete

    “The Neocons” is too vague. The people need an authoritative list with names, addresses and photographs.
     
    Damn. I've said this before, but you make the best damned comments on UR, and you hit the nail squarely on the head once again with that one.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. @Robert Magill

    This is really amazing, think of it: everybody hates the Neocons, not only a majority of the American people, but truly the entire planet. And yet that numerically small group of people has somehow managed to put everybody in danger, including themselves, due to their ugly vindictiveness, infinite arrogance and ideology-induced short-sightedness. That this could ever have happened, and at a planetary scale, is a dramatic testimony to the moral and spiritual decay of our civilization: how did we ever let things get that far?!

    And the next obvious question: can we still stop them?
     
    Stalin found a way to stop the prototype Neocon Leon Trotsky.


    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    True enough. But then, Stalin had control of the party and the country. Alas! Trump does not.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Sean says:

    America throws its weight about but that won’t lead to war. No danger at all of anyone taking on the unbeatable US with nuclear or conventional force. Russia’s doctrine stresses asymmetrical war because the understand shadow boxing is safer. And while the world economic system is dependent on America, it isn’t going to collapse because of a few riots–especially with the massive police apparatus that is in reserve.

    There is a reason why the Neocons thrive in times of crisis: it allows them to hide behind the mayhem, especially when they are the ones who triggered the mayhem in the first place. This means that as long as the Neocons are anywhere near in power they will never, ever, allow peace to suddenly break out, lest the spotlight be suddenly shined directly upon them. Chaos, wars, crises – this is their natural habitat. Think of it as the by-product of their existence. Eventually, of course, they will be stopped and they will be defeated, like all their predecessors in history. But I shudder when I think of the price mankind will have to pay this time around.

    Neocons are not different to anyone in history who had to take care of a state’s business. It would be irrational for a state like the US not to lead with its strengths and be aggressive with because no one knows what other state’s intentions are–or might become in the future.

    Read More
    • Replies: @white noise
    "Neocons are not different to anyone in history who had to take care of a state’s business. "

    You make it sound as if the American politicians are taking care of their rightful business... Not so. Most of them are traitors, because they work for the Jews, not for the American people. They're taking care of a state's business, alright: The state of Israel!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  7. It’s not the cops cracking down on free speech, it’s “Corporate America”, but the effect is the same.

    But hey: in a country where prisons and jails are increasingly run by private companies, what’s the difference between the cops and the corporations?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. @WorkingClass
    "The Neocons" is too vague. The people need an authoritative list with names, addresses and photographs.

    Here is the closest thing to a list of names that google turned up:

    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?450257-The-Neoconservative-Reference-List

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    A list should be easy to develop.

    In Jacques' Paradise anyone still living who's ever run for political office, and their staffs and advisers would be rounded up, they and any offspring spayed, and sent to Abu Ghraib for lifelong "treatment." This goes for anyone who's ever been connected, in any way, with the Federal Reserve or any other large bank or corporation especially one that's been bailed out. Ditto for any foreign "leader" who's ever accepted a penny in foreign "aid," or who's ever had a standing ovation or any other sort of positive recognition from the US government.

    Anyone who ever worked for any government past the age of thirty ( ...some allowance should be made for youthful ignorance and indiscretion, no?) and anyone who ever contributed so much as a nickel to a political party gets rounded up, spayed, and sent to Guantanamo for life with no chance for parole.

    That oughta buy the rest of us a couple of days of peace and quiet.

    , @Z-man
    These three to get rid of would MAGA, one is not on your list. Alan Duche-a witz, Kristol and Krauthammer.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. Sure.

    You may be simply be reaching a personal tipping-point from all the fear-mongering and apocalyptic race-war/civil-war nonsense that has had its ups-and-downs the last year-and-a-half, but which has hit record heights after Charlottesville. Hysterical group-think.

    You have always been a “predictor.” Laying out various scenarios and then going back every few months to try to fit what you said to what happened. This can quickly become self-deluded back-patting.

    You have been correct I think in certain respects and your analysis has usually been top-notch even if it doesn’t always cover all angles.

    But your record forecasting or predicting is just as bad as everybody else’s. We can’t predict. Not the price of oil. Not the lottery. Not the Super-bowl. Not the weather more than 5 days out. Not war. And not war’s unintended consequences.

    Three weeks ago nobody cared about Southern statues or White Supremacists. Two weeks from now nobody will care anymore again. Two weeks ago we were going to nuke North Korea. Now they are not in the news.

    Imagine if that one girl hadn’t been killed by that one guy at the protest or counter-protest. It doesn’t even matter. Nobody will remember her name in a month. But everybody knows who Kim Kardashian is.

    This last 6 months has been, in my opinion, a classic case of the result of cognitive dissonance that occurs when prophecy fails. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Prophecy_Fails

    The prophecy in this case was that Trump was the next Hitler. This and the lingering, very strong sour grapes.

    The whole Russia-Gate thing is slowly being exposed as a hoax but we may still have a case of “some stories are true that never happened.” A huge number of people will never think of Trump anyway other than how they do now no matter what he does or what happens – as evil, or incompetent, or immoral, or whatever.

    I am rather partial to Andrew Bacevich’s analysis that suggests Trump is actually apolitical and non-ideological.

    I think we have been in a very slow, shallow decline since about 1969. Barely noticeable. Bursts of innovation and growth have distracted the country from the fact that the standard of living for 80% of everybody has not really improved. It is unlikely that Trump will reverse this.

    People have been predicting collapse for decades. Read James Howard Kunstler. http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/total-eclipse/

    It kind of happened in 2008-2009.
    Look at the current collapse of large parts of the retail sector.

    Not surprisingly, few are predicting Trump will be in office in 2020 and that the world will look a lot like 2007 at that point. But that is where my money is.

    If “Antifa” continues to wear wear black ninja outfits and masks and continues to use violence, the State will have to crush them.

    Same old, same old. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Something like that.

    I live in Boston. I was 100 yards away from the first bomb that went off at the 2013 Marathon. I saw the National Security State response over the next week. The State Police with a LOT of support did not mess around. Over the years I have seen how the Boston and State police deal with protests and gatherings of all types. Boston is a very safe city. It is difficult to envision what happened in Charlottesville happening here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @white noise
    It may not be an accurate prediction, but this article by The Saker is excellent in that it gives a very accurate, penetrating portrait of the decadence of America, and the main culprits, the predator, parasitic Jews, and their minions: the American politicians, and other assorted traitors.

    And so, are you saying that a repressive police state is good? It's certainly going that way, but no, it's not good at all for the people of America. What America needs is repression against the invader Jews that have hijacked the government, not repression against the American people.

    , @DESERT FOX
    The Boston Marathon bombing was a false flag perpetrated by the deep state, for details see Rense.com, Veteranstoday.com, Globalresearch.ca, Davidicke.com, Whatreallyhappened.com, etc.
    , @Alden
    The difference is that the Mayor of Boston and the Governor of Massachusetts didn't order the police to stand down as the Virginia authorities did.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. trump used the neocon expression ‘drain the swamp’ on the campaign trail. he was talking about washington while the neocons were referring to the near & mid-east. both he & they were full of hubris.
    the swamp dwellers in d.c. can’t be extricated short of revolution. the mid-east is in chaos thanks to the neocons and the swamp is getting, well, swampier. trump has no plans to get us out of the mess the neocons got us in even if he could. this adds to trump’s incompetence, which when applied to his mental cardboard jungle, bodes ill for america under his term – if he serves it out.
    i tend to agree with everything the saker wrote. we are in trouble folks. obama & bush left trump with a mess. trump has not the wherewithal to get us out. but, realistically, who can?
    there is a middle eastern expression that goes something like this: one fool can create problem that 100 wise men can’t solve.
    trump is a clown show. he’s gotta go. the problem is, then we get pence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WJ
    Trump might be a clown show but he will be in the WH on January 1 2021. The political and legal obstacles for his removal are substantial. Perhaps he hasn't drained the swamp but he stopped funding for the Jihadis in Syria, which has essentially ended the war there. He has dramatically improved border security and he obtained a SC nominee who is not left wing crazy as the previous two.
    I am not convinced he will substantially escalate Afghanistan but we will find out perhaps this week.

    He is vastly superior to at least three of predecessors in the job and he is most certainly preferable to the horrendous Clinton/Kaine, open borders neocon clan.
    , @prusmc
    Lawerence Fitton:

    Who can get us out, obviously, not Trump? How about Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Senator Kaine or Devel Patrick? Maybe an experienced foreign policy hand like Joe Biden? Would Bernie accept a draft?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. DFH says:

    Has any empire ever had a ruling class as stupid (I’m talking about the gentiles in particular) as the current one?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Gentiles? The ruling class?

    Clearly you are a Zionist Jew attempting a bad joke.


    "The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone."

    - from: 'The Spirit Of Militarism', by Nahum Goldmann
    Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress
     

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. Adolph says:

    You put forth no plan to eradicate the Jew infestation. Words on top of words make no action.
    Hitler failed. Christ failed. Monoliths are scattered around the world. Make the connection or go home to Mommy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Hitler never tried.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    "holocau$t historian" Raul Hilberg, from
    https://youtu.be/2q51wqEE1fM
    said:
    "we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”
     
    , @white noise
    "You put forth no plan to eradicate the Jew infestation. Words on top of words make no action."

    I don't know if it amounts to a plan, but the only way possible is for the American people to reclaim their rapidly eroding liberties and way of life. Actively. This means a lot of civil unrest. Possibly civil war.

    But for an act of God, only the American people can save themselves.

    The politicians are, most of them, Jewish-feet-licking traitors, and they obviously don't give a shit.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @CalDre
    This is all pre-planned. The thinning of the herd. About the distrust in the media, the politicians, the other institutions - if one bothers to look at the Protocols objectively, regardless of whether it is "Jews" or someone else behind the plan, it's all coming true. All of it. Even the best crystal ball reader of the 18th Century could not have written a plot that so closely resembles the succeeding 200 years. This by itself proves, beyond any question, that this plot exists and has been ongoing for centuries.

    The Protocols even state that the slogan of the totalitarian global government will be "liberty, equality". And that was the slogan of the Bolsheviks - who, incidentally, were largely Jews and largely funded by false Jew bankers, including the Warburgs and Rothschilds.

    In fact, part of the reason the disinformation about the Nazi alleged genocide is so prevalent is that this lie helps bury the Protocols in the dustbin of history. If you mention the Protocols, it must mean that you want all Jews dead, because the Nazis mentioned the Protocols and they wanted all Jews dead (wrong - they wanted all Jews out of Europe, much like Israel wants all Arabs out of Eretz Israel - only difference is, Israel is incapable of doing what it wants).

    No, the point of pointing out the Protocols is that you cannot fight an enemy you cannot even imagine exists. The way to defeat the Illuminati - whether ultimately it's Blue bloods, the Jesuits, the Mafia, Jew bankers, global oligarchs, that sit at the cap of the power pyramid - is to expose them. There is no need to kill or even resettle anyone, it is only a matter of opposing the evil that sits atop that hierarchy - exposing them and subjecting them to the punishment they so richly deserve.

    But the Holohoax is an excellent propaganda device as it has been elevated into a Blinder. You simply associate something with the Holohoax, presented as the worst crime ever (even if true, it would not be, by a long shot), and the listener's conditioning / Pavlovian response shuts down their mind; but instead of salivating, they become energetically enraged. Now that is a powerful form of control! and can be used to hide what would otherwise be the most obvious crimes.

    The biggest slap in the face was on the Huff Post when Bannon was canned.

    Goy Bye.

    How arrogant can you get? It’s like they can’t contain themselves now.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Exactly. A historical pattern that has been repeated over and over again: Jewish ruling elites failing to suppress their limitless arrogance and thereby isolating themselves. And historically we know what usually happens next.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. virgile says:

    I don’t think the neocons want Trump out. They want him to stay as their puppet. If he fights back and start to win then they will do everything to replace him.
    Now with the departure of the strong anti-neocon Steve Bannon, Trump is loosing more chances to resist. Getting back his strength would be a miracle.
    If Trump realizes that he has lost all power and all ways to regain it, he may want to resign and be replaced by Pence who is a weak leader. Yet Pence may object to more wars that the neocons will promote and he could pose a problem for them.
    This is why I think the neocons and the zionists want to keep a powerless Trump in ‘power’

    Read More
    • Replies: @expatriot
    I agree that the Neocons don't want Trump out. I would go further and say that the Deep State wanted him in from the beginning, or at least didn't mind having him in. The reason is they wanted to have him to blame for the crises they saw coming and for the results of their own policies. They themselves realize better than anyone just how high risk are the stratagems they have been having to resort to. They probably don't even see total success as possible any more, and may see total failure as a real possibility. Hence the need for someone like Trump to be the fall guy.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. You’d think the neocons were – shudder – Trotskyists, or something.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. I think I know what the globalist capitalists are doing. It’s not that they like Antifa. I think they despise them. But they do fear the antifa and far-’left’ thugs. And they also fear BLM.

    After all, NY Libs fear blacks. NY libs got so tired of black crime that they elected Clinton to lock up record number of blacks. They elected Giuliani twice to get tough on black crime. And three times they elected Bloomberg of ‘stop and frisk’ fame. And San Fran and other cities did a lot of gentrification, which is codeword for pushing blacks out.

    The fact is the capitalists have NOTHING to fear from Alt Right or ‘nazis’ or white identitarians. White Identitarians don’t rob white yuppies. They don’t do knockout games. They don’t smash windows or burn down buildings. They don’t protest businesses. They didn’t even do the ‘antisemitic hate hoaxes’. It turns out a black guy and Jews carried out those hoaxes. (When Trump truthfully said Jews may be behind some of those bomb threats, the media went ballistic… until the truth came out. Same with Charlottesville. Trump’s crime was noticing that the Antifa scum attacked first, a fact.)

    But capitalists do fear blacks who loot, riot, and turn cities into hell. Capitalists fear antifa bottom-feeders who create havoc in places like San Fran and Seattle. If Capitalists really really feared Alt Right and White Identitarians, they would NOT be purging them. Purging is done to the weak, not to the strong. Capitalists appease whom they fear, not whom they have nothing to fear from.

    So, capitalists wanna do something about antifa and BLM constantly barking at them.

    Now, why can’t the globo-cappers just use their wealth and power to harshly clamp down on antifa and black thugs? After all, they got all the power whereas most antifa are bottomfeeding scum and most blacks are just street thugs. If the rich and powerful wanted to crack antifa skulls and lock up more blacks, they could. So, why don’t they? Because PC dogma rules over America, and it romanticizes the ‘left’ in media and academia and pop culture. And blacks have been so sacralized to prop up ‘white guilt’ that it’s difficult to move harshly against them. We have to indulge their idiocies and use more roundabout ways to control them.

    And this is where ‘nazi’ and ‘confederacy’ are very useful to the Capits or Cappers. If Capits yell, “Look, a Nazi” or “Look, a racist”, the very antifa and BLM who were growling at the capits suddenly go charging at the ‘nazis’.
    This is why Jewish supremacists also find the South so useful. Jewish Supremacists pull every dirty trick in the book to lock up blacks and use extra-policing to control black crime and violence. Also, Jews are no longer for class conflict favoring the proles against the rich and instead for elite global capitalism where Jews get richer. So, Jewish Power is the natural target of blacks and far-leftists. To prevent these people from coming at Jews, Jews create hysteria about KKK and the Sooooouth as diversionary tactic.

    It’s like, if a mad dog is barking at you, it’s smart to toss a bone so that the dog will go after the bone, not you.

    So, this isn’t really so much a Capit war on Alt Right. It is the Capitalists using the Alt Right as a bone to throw at the dogs(blacks and far-left scum) so that the dogs won’t bark and bite at Capitalists.

    Now, the Jewish supremacists are far nastier. If Capitalists just wanna distract the mad barking dogs, Jewish supremacists want to use Antifa and State terror as hunting dogs to kill the wolves of White Independent Movement.

    So, what is the solution? If Alt Right doesn’t want the cappers to treat it so shabbily, it has to make the cappers FEAR the Alt Right? How?

    Alt Right should write up a BLACK BOOK on every capper that goes after Alt Right.

    Write a BLACK BOOK ON GOOGLE like Black Book on Communism. Expose how Google has worked with every thuggish and tyrannical regime around for profit.

    Write a BLACK BOOK ON PAYPAL that details how this organization serves all kinds of terrorists, tyrants, extremists, and etc.

    Expose the cappers. March on capper headquarters.

    If Alt Right goes after the cappers, Antifa will have to defend them.. and this will discredit Antifa as stooges of Globalism.

    It’s like when Alt Right opposed Trump’s attack in Syria, Antifa made fools of themselves by attacking Alt Right than opposing the Missile strike on trumped-up charges. (The media were totally swooning about the naked act of US imperialist aggression. Zakaria said, ‘Trump became president tonight’, and Brian Williams was yammering about ‘beautiful missiles’ and quoting Leonard Cohen.) Sickos.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DFH
    That thesis doesn't make any sense. If they were afraid of antifascists then why would they create and finance them? Why does their media stoke up black resentment if that is what they wish to avoid?

    Why should they be afraid of them? Black crime doesn't affect rich whites. Even if it did, blacks are criminals for prosaic reasons that have nothing to do with BLM. Black riots have no effect on billionaire capitalists either. Its not rich white communities they burn down.
    , @War for Blair Mountain
    You nailed it...go on the attack against the Antifa.

    Over the past few days...several young White Males have been doxxed in their communities...My advice to these White Nationalist is to challenge the local Antifas to a public debate at the local park...invite the local community to attend....debate the local Antifa..point out that they voted for a nonwhite POTUS in 2008...2012 who gave a direct order to organize and fund a Neo-Nazi coup in the Ukraine.....thousands of Russian Christians were murdered...then point out that the local Antifa voted Hillary Clinton in 2016 who created Al QUEDA and ISIS......talk about Obama's coddling of BLM an organization that incited racial violence against White Cops in all over the US.....


    The Antifa are very vulnerable on these points..expose them for the terrorists and traitors that they are...start naming the names of the ANTIFAS and contact their employers...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. DFH says:
    @Priss Factor
    I think I know what the globalist capitalists are doing. It's not that they like Antifa. I think they despise them. But they do fear the antifa and far-'left' thugs. And they also fear BLM.

    After all, NY Libs fear blacks. NY libs got so tired of black crime that they elected Clinton to lock up record number of blacks. They elected Giuliani twice to get tough on black crime. And three times they elected Bloomberg of 'stop and frisk' fame. And San Fran and other cities did a lot of gentrification, which is codeword for pushing blacks out.

    The fact is the capitalists have NOTHING to fear from Alt Right or 'nazis' or white identitarians. White Identitarians don't rob white yuppies. They don't do knockout games. They don't smash windows or burn down buildings. They don't protest businesses. They didn't even do the 'antisemitic hate hoaxes'. It turns out a black guy and Jews carried out those hoaxes. (When Trump truthfully said Jews may be behind some of those bomb threats, the media went ballistic... until the truth came out. Same with Charlottesville. Trump's crime was noticing that the Antifa scum attacked first, a fact.)

    But capitalists do fear blacks who loot, riot, and turn cities into hell. Capitalists fear antifa bottom-feeders who create havoc in places like San Fran and Seattle. If Capitalists really really feared Alt Right and White Identitarians, they would NOT be purging them. Purging is done to the weak, not to the strong. Capitalists appease whom they fear, not whom they have nothing to fear from.

    So, capitalists wanna do something about antifa and BLM constantly barking at them.

    Now, why can't the globo-cappers just use their wealth and power to harshly clamp down on antifa and black thugs? After all, they got all the power whereas most antifa are bottomfeeding scum and most blacks are just street thugs. If the rich and powerful wanted to crack antifa skulls and lock up more blacks, they could. So, why don't they? Because PC dogma rules over America, and it romanticizes the 'left' in media and academia and pop culture. And blacks have been so sacralized to prop up 'white guilt' that it's difficult to move harshly against them. We have to indulge their idiocies and use more roundabout ways to control them.

    And this is where 'nazi' and 'confederacy' are very useful to the Capits or Cappers. If Capits yell, "Look, a Nazi" or "Look, a racist", the very antifa and BLM who were growling at the capits suddenly go charging at the 'nazis'.
    This is why Jewish supremacists also find the South so useful. Jewish Supremacists pull every dirty trick in the book to lock up blacks and use extra-policing to control black crime and violence. Also, Jews are no longer for class conflict favoring the proles against the rich and instead for elite global capitalism where Jews get richer. So, Jewish Power is the natural target of blacks and far-leftists. To prevent these people from coming at Jews, Jews create hysteria about KKK and the Sooooouth as diversionary tactic.

    It's like, if a mad dog is barking at you, it's smart to toss a bone so that the dog will go after the bone, not you.

    So, this isn't really so much a Capit war on Alt Right. It is the Capitalists using the Alt Right as a bone to throw at the dogs(blacks and far-left scum) so that the dogs won't bark and bite at Capitalists.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dIlOAWsh-A

    Now, the Jewish supremacists are far nastier. If Capitalists just wanna distract the mad barking dogs, Jewish supremacists want to use Antifa and State terror as hunting dogs to kill the wolves of White Independent Movement.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIwWa-WkCak

    So, what is the solution? If Alt Right doesn't want the cappers to treat it so shabbily, it has to make the cappers FEAR the Alt Right? How?

    Alt Right should write up a BLACK BOOK on every capper that goes after Alt Right.

    Write a BLACK BOOK ON GOOGLE like Black Book on Communism. Expose how Google has worked with every thuggish and tyrannical regime around for profit.

    Write a BLACK BOOK ON PAYPAL that details how this organization serves all kinds of terrorists, tyrants, extremists, and etc.

    Expose the cappers. March on capper headquarters.

    If Alt Right goes after the cappers, Antifa will have to defend them.. and this will discredit Antifa as stooges of Globalism.

    It's like when Alt Right opposed Trump's attack in Syria, Antifa made fools of themselves by attacking Alt Right than opposing the Missile strike on trumped-up charges. (The media were totally swooning about the naked act of US imperialist aggression. Zakaria said, 'Trump became president tonight', and Brian Williams was yammering about 'beautiful missiles' and quoting Leonard Cohen.) Sickos.

    That thesis doesn’t make any sense. If they were afraid of antifascists then why would they create and finance them? Why does their media stoke up black resentment if that is what they wish to avoid?

    Why should they be afraid of them? Black crime doesn’t affect rich whites. Even if it did, blacks are criminals for prosaic reasons that have nothing to do with BLM. Black riots have no effect on billionaire capitalists either. Its not rich white communities they burn down.

    Read More
    • Replies: @7.62mm
    DFH says:
    August 19, 2017 at 9:15 pm GMT • 100 Words
    @Priss Factor

    That thesis doesn’t make any sense. If they were afraid of antifascists then why would they create and finance them? Why does their media stoke up black resentment if that is what they wish to avoid?

    Why should they be afraid of them? Black crime doesn’t affect rich whites. Even if it did, blacks are criminals for prosaic reasons that have nothing to do with BLM. Black riots have no effect on billionaire capitalists either. Its not rich white communities they burn down.

    Ahhh... the redirect. Nice try.
    , @MarkinLA
    Its not rich white communities they burn down.

    Not yet.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. 7.62mm says:
    @DFH
    That thesis doesn't make any sense. If they were afraid of antifascists then why would they create and finance them? Why does their media stoke up black resentment if that is what they wish to avoid?

    Why should they be afraid of them? Black crime doesn't affect rich whites. Even if it did, blacks are criminals for prosaic reasons that have nothing to do with BLM. Black riots have no effect on billionaire capitalists either. Its not rich white communities they burn down.

    DFH says:
    August 19, 2017 at 9:15 pm GMT • 100 Words

    That thesis doesn’t make any sense. If they were afraid of antifascists then why would they create and finance them? Why does their media stoke up black resentment if that is what they wish to avoid?

    Why should they be afraid of them? Black crime doesn’t affect rich whites. Even if it did, blacks are criminals for prosaic reasons that have nothing to do with BLM. Black riots have no effect on billionaire capitalists either. Its not rich white communities they burn down.

    Ahhh… the redirect. Nice try.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    Doing a spot of redirecting yourself, aren't you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. Wally says:
    @DFH
    Has any empire ever had a ruling class as stupid (I'm talking about the gentiles in particular) as the current one?

    Gentiles? The ruling class?

    Clearly you are a Zionist Jew attempting a bad joke.

    “The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and re-organization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order, secondly, design and imposition of the new order. The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new order.

    The first task of our world revolution is Destruction. All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annihilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native milieus, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacrosanct, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was, must be gone.”

    - from: ‘The Spirit Of Militarism’, by Nahum Goldmann
    Goldmann was the founder & president of the World Jewish Congress

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Wally says:
    @Adolph
    You put forth no plan to eradicate the Jew infestation. Words on top of words make no action.
    Hitler failed. Christ failed. Monoliths are scattered around the world. Make the connection or go home to Mommy.

    Hitler never tried.

    [MORE]

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    “holocau$t historian” Raul Hilberg, from

    said:
    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. Indeed, the present Cold Civil War in the USA has world wide ramifications.
    But what would have happened had FDR’s policies been continued ?
    The USA is in the midst of a political revolution, revolutions seldom improve living conditions.
    A political revolution in the power that led the world since the Casablanca conference, where Churchill discovered he had ran into a trap, is a political revolution in the world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @7.62mm
    DFH says:
    August 19, 2017 at 9:15 pm GMT • 100 Words
    @Priss Factor

    That thesis doesn’t make any sense. If they were afraid of antifascists then why would they create and finance them? Why does their media stoke up black resentment if that is what they wish to avoid?

    Why should they be afraid of them? Black crime doesn’t affect rich whites. Even if it did, blacks are criminals for prosaic reasons that have nothing to do with BLM. Black riots have no effect on billionaire capitalists either. Its not rich white communities they burn down.

    Ahhh... the redirect. Nice try.

    Doing a spot of redirecting yourself, aren’t you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. The evil hand of the “Russian KGB” (yes, I know, the KGB was dissolved in 1991) will be found everywhere, especially amongst US libertarians (who will probably the only ones with enough brains to understand what is taking place).

    I found this line to be a somewhat mystifying exception to an otherwise fine article, unless The Saker is referring specifically to Ron Paul, whose criticisms of the administration have been spot on lately. But in the main, “US libertarians” have about as much brains as a puddle of dog drool (cf. Gary “And what is Aleppo” Johnson for illumination on this point).

    any more or less real war will result in a catastrophic failure for the US at which point the use of nukes by the Neocon crazies might become a very real risk, especially if symbolic US targets such as aircraft carriers are hit

    Coincidentally, I was just thinking the very same thing today. US conventional forces are basically worthless and would be quickly destroyed if put to the test in any general mobilization. Our nuclear deterrence is everything. Nobody will lay a finger on our aircraft carriers for fear of provoking Armageddon, so these lumbering hunks of expensive horseshit get to float around the world “projecting force” when, without the nuclear cover, they would be sent to the bottom without much ado. This cannot help but infuriate anybody who has been the target of a US intervention. I can begin to imagine how this obscene pageantry must appear to non-Western eyes—perhaps something like having a gun held to your head whilst an ill-mannered, fat princeling trashes your house for amusement. I can imagine the bitter resentment they must feel, tempered by the certain knowledge that they will overcome through time and patience as the Empire destroys itself with its hubris. Their retribution, when it comes, will be terrible. This is why we should have made every effort to withdraw from the word stage and defend our limes while we still could.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. Anglo-Zionist yes, but the ‘Zionist’ part is far more dangerous than the ‘Anglo’ part.

    Why? Anglos have no moral credit. Indeed, the only way they can justify their power is to attach to ‘Zionists’, the Jews or Holocaust-People.

    Jews are seen as Eternal Victim People.
    Anglos are seen as White Supremacists who must atone for ‘racism’ and imperialism.

    So, Jews are morally legit. Anglos are not. So, Anglos need to be associated with Jews. This explains the total toady behavior of so many Wasps in GOP. Without Jewish moral cover, they could be denounced for ‘white privilege’ and ‘white racism’. Recent events at Charlottesville showed how totally cucky these Anglos are. They were so quick to denounce Alt Right and praise Antifa as American-as-apple-pie. None of them said anything in defense of Southern Heritage even though the GOP would be NOTHING without Southern votes. Indeed, the ‘white supremacist’ card is a potent weapon for Jews. They can pull it out to make Anglos cower before them. “If you don’t serve us, we will call you ‘white supremacist’. Your whiteness will no longer be partially redeemed by association with Holocaust People.” So, even though the alliance is Anglo-Zionist, it is really Zionist masters and Anglo dogs. Jews don’t have to apologize or atone for anything. Anglos do. Of course, Jews took part in all of Western Imperialism. Jews funded it. And Jews followed Anglos everywhere they went. If Anglos wiped out Indians, Jews sold blue jeans to cowboys. If Anglos settled the south and planted cotton, Jews played a big role in southern finance and trade. But as Jews control the Narrative, we only need to know White Christians Killed Jews in WWII, so Jews are holy and washed clean of all historical crimes.

    Why does this moral thing matter? Well, the modern world is very moralistic, not least because US, the greatest power, presented itself as a moral beacon to the world. Ancient Romans didn’t. They just liked to kick butt. But Americans spread this notion that US is all about freedom, liberty, equality, and etc. Those who make the most moral claims are most vulnerable to accusations of hypocrisy.. which is why Jews fear BDS so much.

    Moral taboos matter. We like to think of business as all about cynical trade of goods and services. Supposedly, it’s all about profits and give-and-take and not about right-or-wrong. This is true enough AMONG nations. Among different nations/cultures, right-and-wrong don’t really matter. Americans may find much that is loathsome about Saudis and vice versa, but both side do trade. America was willing to trade with Red China even though ideologies were totally different. Even though Japan and China have different taboos, they trade. Russia and Turkey have lots of differences in narratives and values, but they trade. It’s all very practical. It’s like diplomacy is different from domestic politics. Inside a nation, taboos matter. But among nations, taboos become suspended because different nations have different taboos. Christian world and Muslim world have different systems of values and sacraments. If Christians insisted that Muslims follow Christian taboos and vice versa as condition for trade, nothing would be traded. So, among nations, trade is indeed really mostly about profits. The exception are the sanctions(mostly by the US) on ‘moral’ grounds, but this is really ethno-politics, with Jews using bogus moral excuse to economically cripple nations they don’t like.

    If taboos don’t matter among nations, they matter a great deal within a nation. You can insult Mao outside China and do trade with China. But if you are situated INSIDE China, you better not publicly badmouth Mao. That violates Chinese taboo, and you will not be allowed to do much in the way of business. The state will target you, and Chinese will see you as toxic, the guy who violated taboo and ‘insulted Chineseness’.

    If you want to do business with Saudis from the outside, you don’t have to be respectful of Islam or Muslim values. Tim Cook is an open homo-bung-boy who threatened Indiana with economic destruction unless it bakes homo wedding cakes for pervs. But Saudis don’t mind doing business with Apple. What Tim Cook does in America is of no concern to them. But, if Tim Cook was working INSIDE Saudi Arabia and said Saudi bakers better make homo cakes, it would be a violation of Islamic taboos, and Cook would be economically frozen and destroyed.

    So, taboos are of great importance within a nation and culture. Taboos don’t easily travel outside the nation. (This is why Jews need EU to impose same taboos on ALL of Europe. This way, every Euro nation will be made to worship Jews and Holocaust, express atonement and guilt, and silence certain kinds of voices. If each nation were allowed to decide on its own taboos, some might actually make taboo-ize things contrary to Jewish wishes. So, EU legal and cultural tyranny is essential in forcing all Europeans to think alike. Also, homomania that Jews promote around the world spread the same taboos controlled by Jews in NY and LA. Once a nation comes to worship homomania, it becomes taboo to oppose the ‘gay agenda’. As the agenda is controlled by Jews, the world will be infected with the Jewish-favored taboo.)
    A taboo goes a long way within a culture and nation. Consider the Amish. Within the community, someone who breaks a taboo and acts as renegade will be SHUNNED by the whole community. He will be shunned in friendship, gathering, and in business. Even his means to make a living will be threatened. Taboos are that important.

    Taboos change of course, depending on who controls the narrative and sacraments. There was a time when interracism with Negroes was taboo. There was a time when homosexuality was taboo. There was a time when adultery among famous people could lead to disgrace. There was a time when being communist was taboo. It was only later that Jews used media to make zealous anti-communism the bigger taboo via association with ‘McCarthyism’.

    Control of taboo is all-important in deciding who can rise and who must fall. What is true of Amish community is true of society as a whole. The taboo-breakers are shunned. In the past, a business promoting homosexuality would have been shunned and denounced. Customers would have avoided the business. And finance and loans would have dried up. Banks would have stopped lending to the pro-homo firm. And other businesses would have cut ties.
    Today, Jews have fixed things that Chick-Fil-A has been banned from many places because it refused to be Dick-Fill-Ass in supportive of ‘gay marriage’. That is how the culture has changed. Those who control the media and academia and entertainment control what is and isn’t taboo.

    There are different kinds of taboo. Some taboos are not rational but rooted in spirituality or customs. So, some culture forbid eating of certain foods. Or certain words or objects are feared or seen as obscene.
    But some taboos are moral, supposed based on ethical reasoning. And in the US, moral taboos are the most important. Still, these taboos are not morally consistent. For instance, Americans are awful proud that they don’t eat dogs and cats like those crazy Asians. But they don’t have taboos against eating pigs even though pigs are wonderful and intelligent animals. In other words, even when moral, taboos are selective depending on emotions, cultural norms, narratives, etc. If there was a massive campaign to ‘humanize’ the noble pig and sacralize piggerishness. things might change.
    It’s like massive campaign against fur made the fur coat a bit problematic for lots of women.

    Anyway, Jews understand the power of taboo. They knew they had to win a psychological war to browbeat the Anglos. Sure, Jews got smarts and can make lots of money and etc. But being rich can be disadvantageous because the have-lesses always feel more morally justified than the have-mores who are tagged with ‘greed’ and hoggishness. So, Jews had to play the narrative of holy Jewish suffering to give cover to their own wealth and privilege. But at the same time, Jews used the narrative to attack Anglo wealth and privilege as undeserved or stolen from others. Filthy rich Hollywood often portrayed Anglos as white-boys-network in exclusive golf clubs and the like.
    Worse, everything white was associated imperialism, slavery, ‘racism’, genocide, and etc. And then, feminism pit white women against white men. Feminism was never about ALL women against ALL men. It was designed to drive a wedge between white men and white women who were instilled with victim mentality vis-a-vis white males. So, Hollywood movies will show white southern women being beaten and battered by Southern Hick men while holy Negroes are presented as allies of white women against the common oppressor. The Jewish-made movie FRIEND GREEN TOMATOES conflates wife-beating with ‘racism’. So, the bad white buy beats up his wife and hates blacks. So, in the end, an alliance of white women and the Negro kills the white guy, cuts him up, bbq’s him, and feeds him to local sheriffs. And MISSISSIPPI BURNING presents white guys as wife-beaters too.

    Jews wrote the BLACK BOOK ON ANGLOS. And Jews used this narrative to denounce, defame, and degrade whiteness. So, no matter how rich or privileged a white person may be, he is a moral zero. If fact, a moral negative. So, the ONLY way he can win moral pts is by associating himself with Jews and ‘Diversity’, a weapon devised by Jews to destroy white nations like Sweden, Austria, Poland, and Hungary. Jews, as holy victim people, can have their own ethno-state and can brazenly work for tribal interests. In contrast, white gentiles have no right to their ‘racist’ identity, territory, and women. Even white women exist to be bought and sold by Jewish vice industry and womb-colonized by blacks and Muslims.

    Jews tag whatever they hate about whites with ‘white supremacism’ and ‘nazi’. Of course, this is highly selective. After all, wasn’t immigration ‘white supremacist’? Until 1965, most immigrants were whites and their arrival doomed Indians. Also, whites fought Mexico and took SW areas from Mexicans. But for some reason, there isn’t much talk of ‘genocide’ of Indians or stealing Mexican land.

    Also, it’s impossible to understand ‘white supremacism’ without element of Jewish involvement. Nazi Germans were the only ones to explicitly deny Jews any role in their imperialism and supremacism. Jews could not join in the Greater German Project. For that reason, German supremacism was indeed a Jew-free supremacism. But this cannot be said for most other kinds of ‘white supremacism’. In one way or another, Jews played a role as financiers, traders, and in other capacities. If whites did ‘genocide’ against Indians, there were Jews peddling guns, whiskey, and clothes to whites in the frontier. Jewish bankers funded much of British Imperialism. Jews played a huge role in Chinese opium trade. Even when Jews were discriminated against, they were still allowed to work in certain industries, mostly finance. And this meant Jewish money played a big role in wars, conquests, colonization, slave trade, and etc. So, most of ‘white supremacism’, except that of German Nazi, had a Jewish element in it. It was a Jewish-White Supremacism. And indeed the Confederacy was just that. So, just like the term Judeo-Christian, we should use the term Jewish-White-Supremacism. The fact is Jews historically financed much of ‘white supremacism’ or provided goods/services to whites involved in the subjugation of other folks. And I suspect, if the Nazi Germans hadn’t been anti-Jewish and allowed Jews to join the movement, a good number of German Jews would have financed Hitler’s moves into Czech, Poland, Greece, Russia, etc.

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/106227/the-forgotten-confederate-jew

    But Jews control the media and narrative, and so, most people don’t know the full extent of Jewish involvement in ‘white supremacism’. They just see Jews as historical victims of whites. They fail to see that Jewish money was often the enabler of ‘white supremacism’… thus making it Jewish-White Supremacism.
    So, many people have a blindspot when it comes to Jewish power. Also, Jews have used ‘antitsemitic’ as a potent taboo term to silence anyone who notices anything about Jewish role in world oppression. It’s okay for Jews to yell ‘nazi’, ‘white supremacist’, ‘wasp old boys network’, and etc. but whites better not notice how Jews have power and abuse it. The term ‘antisemitic’ taboo-izes any such observation.

    Because taboos have great power WITHIN a culture, Jews can destroy ANYONE with accusation of ‘white supremacism’, ‘antisemitism’, ‘racism’, or ‘nazi’. And now, even ‘homophobia’, a proxy taboo of the Jews.

    After the recent Charlottesville incident, despite the fact that Alt Right followed all the rules and were set upon by State Terror and Antifa Terror, corporate America is going after Alt Right while praising Antifa as the goon-thug squad of Jews. Paypal has targed Vdare even though it had NOTHING to do with the meeting.

    This is why, if people want to curtail Jewish supremacist power, they have to create new taboos. They have to write the Black Book of Jews just like Jews wrote the Black Book of Anglos/Whites.
    And this Black Book must shame Jews with many examples of Jewish wrongs. Jewish finance can be associated with Weimar Germany and 1990s Russia, the Rape of Russia by Jewish oligarchs aided by American Jews. And just how did Bernie Madoff get away with such rottenness for so long? Because as long as he made money for his partners by fleecing goyim, many legit Jews coddled and protected him. And there is the black book of Jewish control of media. The wars it brought, like Iraq War, Libya War, Ukraine coup, the Syria mess. And this crazy useless ‘new cold war’ with Russia, a nation with 1/14th the economy of the US. Ridiculous. And Jewish role in white slavery. In gambling and other vice. In communism. In slavery in Brazil. And so on and on. And Nakba and Palestine.

    Now, such accusations will be denounced as ‘antisemitic’ and ‘nazi’. And with ignorance. But if the accusations are made with full documentation, such denunciation(of ‘antisemitism’) will grow weaker. Also, while it would be wrong to blame Jewish Power for isolated Jewish abuses of power, there is a too much of pattern in history and too many places for any honest person to ignore. Also, those who compile the Black Book of Jews must NOT associate with loathsome Nazis who tell fairytales about the holocaust being a hoax. (Granted, Holocaust is treated like a religion, which is why those who question it are called ‘deniers’, as if they’re denying god. What we need is Holocaust Atheism that rejects holocaust as holy religion and treats it as historical event in secular mode. Such ‘atheism’ would not deny the event. Rather, it would approach it with reason, like atheists approached the world with rational and material than spiritual mindset. Holocaust Atheism would stand between Holocaust Worship and Holocaust Desecration of deniers. If Holocaust Worshipers and Holocaust Desecrators have one thing in common, it’s they both approach it as a religion.)

    Jews are smart and know & fear the power of taboos. This is why they are trying to criminalize BDS, a kind of Black Book on Jews/Israel. If BDS becomes a thing, Jews are denounced, associated with ‘racism’, ‘genocide’, and ‘supremacism’. And they are put on the moral defensive. And it might not end with BDS but open up a whole new can of worms. And this can undermine Jewish business power since nearly all of Jewish business is closely aligned with Israel. BDS will associate so much of Jewish business with imperialism, supremacism, ‘racism’, and even ‘genocide’. It might bring down the whole house of cards.
    So, Jews are seeking to ban it by buying up politicians and making them support Zionist oppression of Palestinians. But this can backfire. BDS might become more powerful once criminalized. It might spark moral outrage among many people, and things might heat up even more.

    At any rate, if a supremacist power must be brought down, its weak spot is the taboo. It controls the taboos to boost its own power, but counter-taboos can threaten this. BDS is a counter-taboo that makes Jewish Power very very afraid.

    The Black Book of Jews is most necessary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @white noise
    "This is why, if people want to curtail Jewish supremacist power, they have to create new taboos. They have to write the Black Book of Jews just like Jews wrote the Black Book of Anglos/Whites."

    Right... Exactly... Another instance, someone who has some political power and is actually a decent human being (I know, a tall call for a combo) should set up a CHRISTIAN ANTIDEFAMATION SOCIETY, and then give the Jews frequent, very public dosages of their own 'medicine' of rabid attacks, and see how they like it :D

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. I have to say, what a spectacular failure president Trump has been! Could you imagine that a 70 year old billionare could be so…helpless?

    How come a president, who won 65 million votes, cannot get a single man in his administration who shares his political views? Why is Trump admin full of people, who despise Trump. SAD.

    He did run a spirited campaign though.

    Read More
    • Replies: @white noise
    "How come a president, who won 65 million votes, cannot get a single man in his administration who shares his political views?"

    As someone mentioned here, due to Jewish infestation. And because weak people sell their souls easily in exchange of money and goods. And there are a lot of weak people.
    , @peterAUS
    Two reasons, maybe.

    He failed to keep those people mobilized.
    His opposition didn't make that mistake.

    Those people thought that casting a vote will solve all their problems.
    They failed to get organized into mass support of Trump and his policies.

    Maybe they (people) will learn something from this mistake.
    Maybe not.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. @Sean
    America throws its weight about but that won't lead to war. No danger at all of anyone taking on the unbeatable US with nuclear or conventional force. Russia's doctrine stresses asymmetrical war because the understand shadow boxing is safer. And while the world economic system is dependent on America, it isn't going to collapse because of a few riots--especially with the massive police apparatus that is in reserve.

    There is a reason why the Neocons thrive in times of crisis: it allows them to hide behind the mayhem, especially when they are the ones who triggered the mayhem in the first place. This means that as long as the Neocons are anywhere near in power they will never, ever, allow peace to suddenly break out, lest the spotlight be suddenly shined directly upon them. Chaos, wars, crises – this is their natural habitat. Think of it as the by-product of their existence. Eventually, of course, they will be stopped and they will be defeated, like all their predecessors in history. But I shudder when I think of the price mankind will have to pay this time around.
     
    Neocons are not different to anyone in history who had to take care of a state's business. It would be irrational for a state like the US not to lead with its strengths and be aggressive with because no one knows what other state's intentions are--or might become in the future.

    “Neocons are not different to anyone in history who had to take care of a state’s business. ”

    You make it sound as if the American politicians are taking care of their rightful business… Not so. Most of them are traitors, because they work for the Jews, not for the American people. They’re taking care of a state’s business, alright: The state of Israel!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. @WorkingClass
    "The Neocons" is too vague. The people need an authoritative list with names, addresses and photographs.

    Yeah, and then publish the list in CNN, Fox, Washington Post, et al… Sure, tomorrow morning, they all will be happy to comply. They may even agree to start a massive vilification campaign against themselves.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  28. @Johnny Rico
    Sure.

    You may be simply be reaching a personal tipping-point from all the fear-mongering and apocalyptic race-war/civil-war nonsense that has had its ups-and-downs the last year-and-a-half, but which has hit record heights after Charlottesville. Hysterical group-think.

    You have always been a “predictor.” Laying out various scenarios and then going back every few months to try to fit what you said to what happened. This can quickly become self-deluded back-patting.

    You have been correct I think in certain respects and your analysis has usually been top-notch even if it doesn’t always cover all angles.

    But your record forecasting or predicting is just as bad as everybody else’s. We can’t predict. Not the price of oil. Not the lottery. Not the Super-bowl. Not the weather more than 5 days out. Not war. And not war’s unintended consequences.

    Three weeks ago nobody cared about Southern statues or White Supremacists. Two weeks from now nobody will care anymore again. Two weeks ago we were going to nuke North Korea. Now they are not in the news.

    Imagine if that one girl hadn’t been killed by that one guy at the protest or counter-protest. It doesn't even matter. Nobody will remember her name in a month. But everybody knows who Kim Kardashian is.

    This last 6 months has been, in my opinion, a classic case of the result of cognitive dissonance that occurs when prophecy fails. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Prophecy_Fails

    The prophecy in this case was that Trump was the next Hitler. This and the lingering, very strong sour grapes.

    The whole Russia-Gate thing is slowly being exposed as a hoax but we may still have a case of “some stories are true that never happened.” A huge number of people will never think of Trump anyway other than how they do now no matter what he does or what happens – as evil, or incompetent, or immoral, or whatever.

    I am rather partial to Andrew Bacevich’s analysis that suggests Trump is actually apolitical and non-ideological.

    I think we have been in a very slow, shallow decline since about 1969. Barely noticeable. Bursts of innovation and growth have distracted the country from the fact that the standard of living for 80% of everybody has not really improved. It is unlikely that Trump will reverse this.

    People have been predicting collapse for decades. Read James Howard Kunstler. http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/total-eclipse/

    It kind of happened in 2008-2009.
    Look at the current collapse of large parts of the retail sector.

    Not surprisingly, few are predicting Trump will be in office in 2020 and that the world will look a lot like 2007 at that point. But that is where my money is.

    If "Antifa" continues to wear wear black ninja outfits and masks and continues to use violence, the State will have to crush them.

    Same old, same old. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Something like that.

    I live in Boston. I was 100 yards away from the first bomb that went off at the 2013 Marathon. I saw the National Security State response over the next week. The State Police with a LOT of support did not mess around. Over the years I have seen how the Boston and State police deal with protests and gatherings of all types. Boston is a very safe city. It is difficult to envision what happened in Charlottesville happening here.

    It may not be an accurate prediction, but this article by The Saker is excellent in that it gives a very accurate, penetrating portrait of the decadence of America, and the main culprits, the predator, parasitic Jews, and their minions: the American politicians, and other assorted traitors.

    And so, are you saying that a repressive police state is good? It’s certainly going that way, but no, it’s not good at all for the people of America. What America needs is repression against the invader Jews that have hijacked the government, not repression against the American people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. @Adolph
    You put forth no plan to eradicate the Jew infestation. Words on top of words make no action.
    Hitler failed. Christ failed. Monoliths are scattered around the world. Make the connection or go home to Mommy.

    “You put forth no plan to eradicate the Jew infestation. Words on top of words make no action.”

    I don’t know if it amounts to a plan, but the only way possible is for the American people to reclaim their rapidly eroding liberties and way of life. Actively. This means a lot of civil unrest. Possibly civil war.

    But for an act of God, only the American people can save themselves.

    The politicians are, most of them, Jewish-feet-licking traitors, and they obviously don’t give a shit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. A bit windy, but every point excellent.

    There is a reason why the Neocons thrive in times of crisis: it allows them to hide behind the mayhem…

    True, but it’s astonishing how so many people still don’t get it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. @WorkingClass
    "The Neocons" is too vague. The people need an authoritative list with names, addresses and photographs.

    “The Neocons” is too vague. The people need an authoritative list with names, addresses and photographs.

    Damn. I’ve said this before, but you make the best damned comments on UR, and you hit the nail squarely on the head once again with that one.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. @Priss Factor
    Anglo-Zionist yes, but the 'Zionist' part is far more dangerous than the 'Anglo' part.

    Why? Anglos have no moral credit. Indeed, the only way they can justify their power is to attach to 'Zionists', the Jews or Holocaust-People.

    Jews are seen as Eternal Victim People.
    Anglos are seen as White Supremacists who must atone for 'racism' and imperialism.

    So, Jews are morally legit. Anglos are not. So, Anglos need to be associated with Jews. This explains the total toady behavior of so many Wasps in GOP. Without Jewish moral cover, they could be denounced for 'white privilege' and 'white racism'. Recent events at Charlottesville showed how totally cucky these Anglos are. They were so quick to denounce Alt Right and praise Antifa as American-as-apple-pie. None of them said anything in defense of Southern Heritage even though the GOP would be NOTHING without Southern votes. Indeed, the 'white supremacist' card is a potent weapon for Jews. They can pull it out to make Anglos cower before them. "If you don't serve us, we will call you 'white supremacist'. Your whiteness will no longer be partially redeemed by association with Holocaust People." So, even though the alliance is Anglo-Zionist, it is really Zionist masters and Anglo dogs. Jews don't have to apologize or atone for anything. Anglos do. Of course, Jews took part in all of Western Imperialism. Jews funded it. And Jews followed Anglos everywhere they went. If Anglos wiped out Indians, Jews sold blue jeans to cowboys. If Anglos settled the south and planted cotton, Jews played a big role in southern finance and trade. But as Jews control the Narrative, we only need to know White Christians Killed Jews in WWII, so Jews are holy and washed clean of all historical crimes.

    Why does this moral thing matter? Well, the modern world is very moralistic, not least because US, the greatest power, presented itself as a moral beacon to the world. Ancient Romans didn't. They just liked to kick butt. But Americans spread this notion that US is all about freedom, liberty, equality, and etc. Those who make the most moral claims are most vulnerable to accusations of hypocrisy.. which is why Jews fear BDS so much.

    Moral taboos matter. We like to think of business as all about cynical trade of goods and services. Supposedly, it's all about profits and give-and-take and not about right-or-wrong. This is true enough AMONG nations. Among different nations/cultures, right-and-wrong don't really matter. Americans may find much that is loathsome about Saudis and vice versa, but both side do trade. America was willing to trade with Red China even though ideologies were totally different. Even though Japan and China have different taboos, they trade. Russia and Turkey have lots of differences in narratives and values, but they trade. It's all very practical. It's like diplomacy is different from domestic politics. Inside a nation, taboos matter. But among nations, taboos become suspended because different nations have different taboos. Christian world and Muslim world have different systems of values and sacraments. If Christians insisted that Muslims follow Christian taboos and vice versa as condition for trade, nothing would be traded. So, among nations, trade is indeed really mostly about profits. The exception are the sanctions(mostly by the US) on 'moral' grounds, but this is really ethno-politics, with Jews using bogus moral excuse to economically cripple nations they don't like.

    If taboos don't matter among nations, they matter a great deal within a nation. You can insult Mao outside China and do trade with China. But if you are situated INSIDE China, you better not publicly badmouth Mao. That violates Chinese taboo, and you will not be allowed to do much in the way of business. The state will target you, and Chinese will see you as toxic, the guy who violated taboo and 'insulted Chineseness'.

    If you want to do business with Saudis from the outside, you don't have to be respectful of Islam or Muslim values. Tim Cook is an open homo-bung-boy who threatened Indiana with economic destruction unless it bakes homo wedding cakes for pervs. But Saudis don't mind doing business with Apple. What Tim Cook does in America is of no concern to them. But, if Tim Cook was working INSIDE Saudi Arabia and said Saudi bakers better make homo cakes, it would be a violation of Islamic taboos, and Cook would be economically frozen and destroyed.

    So, taboos are of great importance within a nation and culture. Taboos don't easily travel outside the nation. (This is why Jews need EU to impose same taboos on ALL of Europe. This way, every Euro nation will be made to worship Jews and Holocaust, express atonement and guilt, and silence certain kinds of voices. If each nation were allowed to decide on its own taboos, some might actually make taboo-ize things contrary to Jewish wishes. So, EU legal and cultural tyranny is essential in forcing all Europeans to think alike. Also, homomania that Jews promote around the world spread the same taboos controlled by Jews in NY and LA. Once a nation comes to worship homomania, it becomes taboo to oppose the 'gay agenda'. As the agenda is controlled by Jews, the world will be infected with the Jewish-favored taboo.)
    A taboo goes a long way within a culture and nation. Consider the Amish. Within the community, someone who breaks a taboo and acts as renegade will be SHUNNED by the whole community. He will be shunned in friendship, gathering, and in business. Even his means to make a living will be threatened. Taboos are that important.

    Taboos change of course, depending on who controls the narrative and sacraments. There was a time when interracism with Negroes was taboo. There was a time when homosexuality was taboo. There was a time when adultery among famous people could lead to disgrace. There was a time when being communist was taboo. It was only later that Jews used media to make zealous anti-communism the bigger taboo via association with 'McCarthyism'.

    Control of taboo is all-important in deciding who can rise and who must fall. What is true of Amish community is true of society as a whole. The taboo-breakers are shunned. In the past, a business promoting homosexuality would have been shunned and denounced. Customers would have avoided the business. And finance and loans would have dried up. Banks would have stopped lending to the pro-homo firm. And other businesses would have cut ties.
    Today, Jews have fixed things that Chick-Fil-A has been banned from many places because it refused to be Dick-Fill-Ass in supportive of 'gay marriage'. That is how the culture has changed. Those who control the media and academia and entertainment control what is and isn't taboo.

    There are different kinds of taboo. Some taboos are not rational but rooted in spirituality or customs. So, some culture forbid eating of certain foods. Or certain words or objects are feared or seen as obscene.
    But some taboos are moral, supposed based on ethical reasoning. And in the US, moral taboos are the most important. Still, these taboos are not morally consistent. For instance, Americans are awful proud that they don't eat dogs and cats like those crazy Asians. But they don't have taboos against eating pigs even though pigs are wonderful and intelligent animals. In other words, even when moral, taboos are selective depending on emotions, cultural norms, narratives, etc. If there was a massive campaign to 'humanize' the noble pig and sacralize piggerishness. things might change.
    It's like massive campaign against fur made the fur coat a bit problematic for lots of women.

    Anyway, Jews understand the power of taboo. They knew they had to win a psychological war to browbeat the Anglos. Sure, Jews got smarts and can make lots of money and etc. But being rich can be disadvantageous because the have-lesses always feel more morally justified than the have-mores who are tagged with 'greed' and hoggishness. So, Jews had to play the narrative of holy Jewish suffering to give cover to their own wealth and privilege. But at the same time, Jews used the narrative to attack Anglo wealth and privilege as undeserved or stolen from others. Filthy rich Hollywood often portrayed Anglos as white-boys-network in exclusive golf clubs and the like.
    Worse, everything white was associated imperialism, slavery, 'racism', genocide, and etc. And then, feminism pit white women against white men. Feminism was never about ALL women against ALL men. It was designed to drive a wedge between white men and white women who were instilled with victim mentality vis-a-vis white males. So, Hollywood movies will show white southern women being beaten and battered by Southern Hick men while holy Negroes are presented as allies of white women against the common oppressor. The Jewish-made movie FRIEND GREEN TOMATOES conflates wife-beating with 'racism'. So, the bad white buy beats up his wife and hates blacks. So, in the end, an alliance of white women and the Negro kills the white guy, cuts him up, bbq's him, and feeds him to local sheriffs. And MISSISSIPPI BURNING presents white guys as wife-beaters too.

    Jews wrote the BLACK BOOK ON ANGLOS. And Jews used this narrative to denounce, defame, and degrade whiteness. So, no matter how rich or privileged a white person may be, he is a moral zero. If fact, a moral negative. So, the ONLY way he can win moral pts is by associating himself with Jews and 'Diversity', a weapon devised by Jews to destroy white nations like Sweden, Austria, Poland, and Hungary. Jews, as holy victim people, can have their own ethno-state and can brazenly work for tribal interests. In contrast, white gentiles have no right to their 'racist' identity, territory, and women. Even white women exist to be bought and sold by Jewish vice industry and womb-colonized by blacks and Muslims.

    Jews tag whatever they hate about whites with 'white supremacism' and 'nazi'. Of course, this is highly selective. After all, wasn't immigration 'white supremacist'? Until 1965, most immigrants were whites and their arrival doomed Indians. Also, whites fought Mexico and took SW areas from Mexicans. But for some reason, there isn't much talk of 'genocide' of Indians or stealing Mexican land.

    Also, it's impossible to understand 'white supremacism' without element of Jewish involvement. Nazi Germans were the only ones to explicitly deny Jews any role in their imperialism and supremacism. Jews could not join in the Greater German Project. For that reason, German supremacism was indeed a Jew-free supremacism. But this cannot be said for most other kinds of 'white supremacism'. In one way or another, Jews played a role as financiers, traders, and in other capacities. If whites did 'genocide' against Indians, there were Jews peddling guns, whiskey, and clothes to whites in the frontier. Jewish bankers funded much of British Imperialism. Jews played a huge role in Chinese opium trade. Even when Jews were discriminated against, they were still allowed to work in certain industries, mostly finance. And this meant Jewish money played a big role in wars, conquests, colonization, slave trade, and etc. So, most of 'white supremacism', except that of German Nazi, had a Jewish element in it. It was a Jewish-White Supremacism. And indeed the Confederacy was just that. So, just like the term Judeo-Christian, we should use the term Jewish-White-Supremacism. The fact is Jews historically financed much of 'white supremacism' or provided goods/services to whites involved in the subjugation of other folks. And I suspect, if the Nazi Germans hadn't been anti-Jewish and allowed Jews to join the movement, a good number of German Jews would have financed Hitler's moves into Czech, Poland, Greece, Russia, etc.

    http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/106227/the-forgotten-confederate-jew

    But Jews control the media and narrative, and so, most people don't know the full extent of Jewish involvement in 'white supremacism'. They just see Jews as historical victims of whites. They fail to see that Jewish money was often the enabler of 'white supremacism'... thus making it Jewish-White Supremacism.
    So, many people have a blindspot when it comes to Jewish power. Also, Jews have used 'antitsemitic' as a potent taboo term to silence anyone who notices anything about Jewish role in world oppression. It's okay for Jews to yell 'nazi', 'white supremacist', 'wasp old boys network', and etc. but whites better not notice how Jews have power and abuse it. The term 'antisemitic' taboo-izes any such observation.

    Because taboos have great power WITHIN a culture, Jews can destroy ANYONE with accusation of 'white supremacism', 'antisemitism', 'racism', or 'nazi'. And now, even 'homophobia', a proxy taboo of the Jews.

    After the recent Charlottesville incident, despite the fact that Alt Right followed all the rules and were set upon by State Terror and Antifa Terror, corporate America is going after Alt Right while praising Antifa as the goon-thug squad of Jews. Paypal has targed Vdare even though it had NOTHING to do with the meeting.

    This is why, if people want to curtail Jewish supremacist power, they have to create new taboos. They have to write the Black Book of Jews just like Jews wrote the Black Book of Anglos/Whites.
    And this Black Book must shame Jews with many examples of Jewish wrongs. Jewish finance can be associated with Weimar Germany and 1990s Russia, the Rape of Russia by Jewish oligarchs aided by American Jews. And just how did Bernie Madoff get away with such rottenness for so long? Because as long as he made money for his partners by fleecing goyim, many legit Jews coddled and protected him. And there is the black book of Jewish control of media. The wars it brought, like Iraq War, Libya War, Ukraine coup, the Syria mess. And this crazy useless 'new cold war' with Russia, a nation with 1/14th the economy of the US. Ridiculous. And Jewish role in white slavery. In gambling and other vice. In communism. In slavery in Brazil. And so on and on. And Nakba and Palestine.

    Now, such accusations will be denounced as 'antisemitic' and 'nazi'. And with ignorance. But if the accusations are made with full documentation, such denunciation(of 'antisemitism') will grow weaker. Also, while it would be wrong to blame Jewish Power for isolated Jewish abuses of power, there is a too much of pattern in history and too many places for any honest person to ignore. Also, those who compile the Black Book of Jews must NOT associate with loathsome Nazis who tell fairytales about the holocaust being a hoax. (Granted, Holocaust is treated like a religion, which is why those who question it are called 'deniers', as if they're denying god. What we need is Holocaust Atheism that rejects holocaust as holy religion and treats it as historical event in secular mode. Such 'atheism' would not deny the event. Rather, it would approach it with reason, like atheists approached the world with rational and material than spiritual mindset. Holocaust Atheism would stand between Holocaust Worship and Holocaust Desecration of deniers. If Holocaust Worshipers and Holocaust Desecrators have one thing in common, it's they both approach it as a religion.)

    Jews are smart and know & fear the power of taboos. This is why they are trying to criminalize BDS, a kind of Black Book on Jews/Israel. If BDS becomes a thing, Jews are denounced, associated with 'racism', 'genocide', and 'supremacism'. And they are put on the moral defensive. And it might not end with BDS but open up a whole new can of worms. And this can undermine Jewish business power since nearly all of Jewish business is closely aligned with Israel. BDS will associate so much of Jewish business with imperialism, supremacism, 'racism', and even 'genocide'. It might bring down the whole house of cards.
    So, Jews are seeking to ban it by buying up politicians and making them support Zionist oppression of Palestinians. But this can backfire. BDS might become more powerful once criminalized. It might spark moral outrage among many people, and things might heat up even more.

    At any rate, if a supremacist power must be brought down, its weak spot is the taboo. It controls the taboos to boost its own power, but counter-taboos can threaten this. BDS is a counter-taboo that makes Jewish Power very very afraid.

    The Black Book of Jews is most necessary.

    “This is why, if people want to curtail Jewish supremacist power, they have to create new taboos. They have to write the Black Book of Jews just like Jews wrote the Black Book of Anglos/Whites.”

    Right… Exactly… Another instance, someone who has some political power and is actually a decent human being (I know, a tall call for a combo) should set up a CHRISTIAN ANTIDEFAMATION SOCIETY, and then give the Jews frequent, very public dosages of their own ‘medicine’ of rabid attacks, and see how they like it :D

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    CHRISTIAN ANTIDEFAMATION SOCIETY
     
    Excellent idea.

    Muslims should do the same if they haven't already. Both should sue the media into oblivion for any scurrilous, libelous lies and/or "hate" speech as well. Freedom of the press? Fuggedaboudit. You abuse yer freedoms, you lose yer freedoms.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  33. @Felix Keverich
    I have to say, what a spectacular failure president Trump has been! Could you imagine that a 70 year old billionare could be so...helpless?

    How come a president, who won 65 million votes, cannot get a single man in his administration who shares his political views? Why is Trump admin full of people, who despise Trump. SAD.

    He did run a spirited campaign though.

    “How come a president, who won 65 million votes, cannot get a single man in his administration who shares his political views?”

    As someone mentioned here, due to Jewish infestation. And because weak people sell their souls easily in exchange of money and goods. And there are a lot of weak people.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Caterina
    Drop the anti-Jewish bigotry and I'd agree.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. @WorkingClass
    Here is the closest thing to a list of names that google turned up:

    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?450257-The-Neoconservative-Reference-List

    A list should be easy to develop.

    In Jacques’ Paradise anyone still living who’s ever run for political office, and their staffs and advisers would be rounded up, they and any offspring spayed, and sent to Abu Ghraib for lifelong “treatment.” This goes for anyone who’s ever been connected, in any way, with the Federal Reserve or any other large bank or corporation especially one that’s been bailed out. Ditto for any foreign “leader” who’s ever accepted a penny in foreign “aid,” or who’s ever had a standing ovation or any other sort of positive recognition from the US government.

    Anyone who ever worked for any government past the age of thirty ( …some allowance should be made for youthful ignorance and indiscretion, no?) and anyone who ever contributed so much as a nickel to a political party gets rounded up, spayed, and sent to Guantanamo for life with no chance for parole.

    That oughta buy the rest of us a couple of days of peace and quiet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. This is a very good article. I would quibble on a minor thing about North Korea. They could definitely cause problems with their nukes via the old “Death Shroud” technique from Dr. Strangelove.

    North Korea doesn’t need ICBMs.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34797252

    On more humorous note:

    The world is moving on, while the cat is busy destroying himself.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  36. Z-man says:
    @WorkingClass
    Here is the closest thing to a list of names that google turned up:

    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?450257-The-Neoconservative-Reference-List

    These three to get rid of would MAGA, one is not on your list. Alan Duche-a witz, Kristol and Krauthammer.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. WJ says:
    @Lawrence Fitton
    trump used the neocon expression 'drain the swamp' on the campaign trail. he was talking about washington while the neocons were referring to the near & mid-east. both he & they were full of hubris.
    the swamp dwellers in d.c. can't be extricated short of revolution. the mid-east is in chaos thanks to the neocons and the swamp is getting, well, swampier. trump has no plans to get us out of the mess the neocons got us in even if he could. this adds to trump's incompetence, which when applied to his mental cardboard jungle, bodes ill for america under his term - if he serves it out.
    i tend to agree with everything the saker wrote. we are in trouble folks. obama & bush left trump with a mess. trump has not the wherewithal to get us out. but, realistically, who can?
    there is a middle eastern expression that goes something like this: one fool can create problem that 100 wise men can't solve.
    trump is a clown show. he's gotta go. the problem is, then we get pence.

    Trump might be a clown show but he will be in the WH on January 1 2021. The political and legal obstacles for his removal are substantial. Perhaps he hasn’t drained the swamp but he stopped funding for the Jihadis in Syria, which has essentially ended the war there. He has dramatically improved border security and he obtained a SC nominee who is not left wing crazy as the previous two.
    I am not convinced he will substantially escalate Afghanistan but we will find out perhaps this week.

    He is vastly superior to at least three of predecessors in the job and he is most certainly preferable to the horrendous Clinton/Kaine, open borders neocon clan.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Erebus

    Trump might be a clown show but he will be in the WH on January 1 2021.
     
    David Goldman, (formerly blogging as Spengler) has an interesting thesis. To whit, that Trump's reaction to Charlottesville will split both parties, and his populism will unite the middle against the 2 extremes. America would suddenly find itself with 3 parties, with the middle one by far the largest. I don't know the American political climate well enough to critique this, but some here may find it interesting: http://www.atimes.com/unintended-consequences-charlottesville/
    , @EugeneGur
    Trump sure is better than Hillary, but that’s not such a big achievement: I can think of very few people who are worse than her. He did not fulfill his key promise, though: stop foreign policy BS and deal with the US problems at home (infrastructure, manufacturing, education, health care, etc.)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. Sherman says:

    Hey Andrey

    When war breaks out hopefully Smyrna Beach will stay safe.

    Sherm

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alberto Campos
    Private threats not allowed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Saker

    It is not at all obvious that you and Paul Craig Roberts are as anti-war as you both claim to be since you both appear to be on board with flooding the US with Muslims so the Muslim “Americans” can vote the Historic Native Born White American Working Class into a racial minority within the borders of the US. You both support an immigration policy that is demographically genocidal.

    What do you have to in response?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. @white noise
    "This is why, if people want to curtail Jewish supremacist power, they have to create new taboos. They have to write the Black Book of Jews just like Jews wrote the Black Book of Anglos/Whites."

    Right... Exactly... Another instance, someone who has some political power and is actually a decent human being (I know, a tall call for a combo) should set up a CHRISTIAN ANTIDEFAMATION SOCIETY, and then give the Jews frequent, very public dosages of their own 'medicine' of rabid attacks, and see how they like it :D

    CHRISTIAN ANTIDEFAMATION SOCIETY

    Excellent idea.

    Muslims should do the same if they haven’t already. Both should sue the media into oblivion for any scurrilous, libelous lies and/or “hate” speech as well. Freedom of the press? Fuggedaboudit. You abuse yer freedoms, you lose yer freedoms.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @Priss Factor
    I think I know what the globalist capitalists are doing. It's not that they like Antifa. I think they despise them. But they do fear the antifa and far-'left' thugs. And they also fear BLM.

    After all, NY Libs fear blacks. NY libs got so tired of black crime that they elected Clinton to lock up record number of blacks. They elected Giuliani twice to get tough on black crime. And three times they elected Bloomberg of 'stop and frisk' fame. And San Fran and other cities did a lot of gentrification, which is codeword for pushing blacks out.

    The fact is the capitalists have NOTHING to fear from Alt Right or 'nazis' or white identitarians. White Identitarians don't rob white yuppies. They don't do knockout games. They don't smash windows or burn down buildings. They don't protest businesses. They didn't even do the 'antisemitic hate hoaxes'. It turns out a black guy and Jews carried out those hoaxes. (When Trump truthfully said Jews may be behind some of those bomb threats, the media went ballistic... until the truth came out. Same with Charlottesville. Trump's crime was noticing that the Antifa scum attacked first, a fact.)

    But capitalists do fear blacks who loot, riot, and turn cities into hell. Capitalists fear antifa bottom-feeders who create havoc in places like San Fran and Seattle. If Capitalists really really feared Alt Right and White Identitarians, they would NOT be purging them. Purging is done to the weak, not to the strong. Capitalists appease whom they fear, not whom they have nothing to fear from.

    So, capitalists wanna do something about antifa and BLM constantly barking at them.

    Now, why can't the globo-cappers just use their wealth and power to harshly clamp down on antifa and black thugs? After all, they got all the power whereas most antifa are bottomfeeding scum and most blacks are just street thugs. If the rich and powerful wanted to crack antifa skulls and lock up more blacks, they could. So, why don't they? Because PC dogma rules over America, and it romanticizes the 'left' in media and academia and pop culture. And blacks have been so sacralized to prop up 'white guilt' that it's difficult to move harshly against them. We have to indulge their idiocies and use more roundabout ways to control them.

    And this is where 'nazi' and 'confederacy' are very useful to the Capits or Cappers. If Capits yell, "Look, a Nazi" or "Look, a racist", the very antifa and BLM who were growling at the capits suddenly go charging at the 'nazis'.
    This is why Jewish supremacists also find the South so useful. Jewish Supremacists pull every dirty trick in the book to lock up blacks and use extra-policing to control black crime and violence. Also, Jews are no longer for class conflict favoring the proles against the rich and instead for elite global capitalism where Jews get richer. So, Jewish Power is the natural target of blacks and far-leftists. To prevent these people from coming at Jews, Jews create hysteria about KKK and the Sooooouth as diversionary tactic.

    It's like, if a mad dog is barking at you, it's smart to toss a bone so that the dog will go after the bone, not you.

    So, this isn't really so much a Capit war on Alt Right. It is the Capitalists using the Alt Right as a bone to throw at the dogs(blacks and far-left scum) so that the dogs won't bark and bite at Capitalists.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dIlOAWsh-A

    Now, the Jewish supremacists are far nastier. If Capitalists just wanna distract the mad barking dogs, Jewish supremacists want to use Antifa and State terror as hunting dogs to kill the wolves of White Independent Movement.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIwWa-WkCak

    So, what is the solution? If Alt Right doesn't want the cappers to treat it so shabbily, it has to make the cappers FEAR the Alt Right? How?

    Alt Right should write up a BLACK BOOK on every capper that goes after Alt Right.

    Write a BLACK BOOK ON GOOGLE like Black Book on Communism. Expose how Google has worked with every thuggish and tyrannical regime around for profit.

    Write a BLACK BOOK ON PAYPAL that details how this organization serves all kinds of terrorists, tyrants, extremists, and etc.

    Expose the cappers. March on capper headquarters.

    If Alt Right goes after the cappers, Antifa will have to defend them.. and this will discredit Antifa as stooges of Globalism.

    It's like when Alt Right opposed Trump's attack in Syria, Antifa made fools of themselves by attacking Alt Right than opposing the Missile strike on trumped-up charges. (The media were totally swooning about the naked act of US imperialist aggression. Zakaria said, 'Trump became president tonight', and Brian Williams was yammering about 'beautiful missiles' and quoting Leonard Cohen.) Sickos.

    You nailed it…go on the attack against the Antifa.

    Over the past few days…several young White Males have been doxxed in their communities…My advice to these White Nationalist is to challenge the local Antifas to a public debate at the local park…invite the local community to attend….debate the local Antifa..point out that they voted for a nonwhite POTUS in 2008…2012 who gave a direct order to organize and fund a Neo-Nazi coup in the Ukraine…..thousands of Russian Christians were murdered…then point out that the local Antifa voted Hillary Clinton in 2016 who created Al QUEDA and ISIS……talk about Obama’s coddling of BLM an organization that incited racial violence against White Cops in all over the US…..

    The Antifa are very vulnerable on these points..expose them for the terrorists and traitors that they are…start naming the names of the ANTIFAS and contact their employers…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. Tulips says:

    I am surprised by the anti-Semitism in the comments. Reading these comments causes me to think that Canada, Mexico, Cuba, and other near-by nations should have contingency plans for Jewish refugees fleeing the USA. Not all neo-cons are Jewish and not all Jewish people are neo-cons. Similarly, not all Zionists are Jewish and not all Jewish persons are Zionists. It looks like there is a deep dislike or fear that is easily triggered by critical political essays, like Saker’s, about politics, foreign policy, banking and war. Commenters with these reactions to Saker’s essay should maybe introspect a little on what is running in the minds and emotions.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DFH

    Not all neo-cons are Jewish and not all Jewish people are neo-cons. Similarly, not all Zionists are Jewish and not all Jewish persons are Zionists.
     
    And? Neo-conservatism is a Jewish ideology; it was founded and driven by Jews as a vehicle for Jewish ethnic interests.

    Commenters with these reactions to Saker’s essay should maybe introspect a little on what is running in the minds and emotions.
     
    Isn't the appropriate response to look at the facts of the matter to determine whether opposition to Jewish influence is justified or not? What does introspection have to do with anything?
    , @nsa
    What's "running in the minds and emotions" is shoving you into an oven and setting the dial to extra crispy.
    , @white noise
    We prefer to rely on what's running through objective reality... The good old facts. In other words, the antisemitism you see is a natural reaction to the Jews anti-whiteness and anti -Christianism, anti-heterosexuality, and a long list of antis.

    If in doubt, go have a look at the Jewish press outlets, where they typically don't hide at all their scorn and even hatred for us 'goyims'... Even Menahem Begin, when he was Prime Minister, said that 'the goyim will live to serve us'... His statement is a matter of public record. That leaves no room for any doubts as to the Jewish true desire... The huge backlash they will eventually face will be a boomerang initiated by them, coming back at them.

    , @anon
    The hangman , soldiers, or the police guarding the cell are not the real architect of the legal system or of the military decision making process .

    Different gentiles figures in this NeoCon game of regime change, new wars, perpetual war, delivery of the financial instruments to enrich Israel and rob its enemies are paid and they happen to be employee of the pyramidal fraudulent system run by the Zionist. Their power come in pushing for agenda at seriously important level of governance but often against their wishes and against the interest of the ethnic groups from which they are drawn. So they look famous powerful and independent .
    They are no more independent than the hangman is .
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. Blake says:

    George W. Bush once asked his father to define Neoconservatism. “‘What’s a neocon?’ ‘Do you want names, or a description?’ answered [the elder Bush]. ‘Description.’ ‘Well,’ said the former president of the United States, ‘I’ll give it to you in one word: Israel.’” – Andrew Cockburn, Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy (New York: Scribner, 2007), 219.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  44. DFH says:
    @Tulips
    I am surprised by the anti-Semitism in the comments. Reading these comments causes me to think that Canada, Mexico, Cuba, and other near-by nations should have contingency plans for Jewish refugees fleeing the USA. Not all neo-cons are Jewish and not all Jewish people are neo-cons. Similarly, not all Zionists are Jewish and not all Jewish persons are Zionists. It looks like there is a deep dislike or fear that is easily triggered by critical political essays, like Saker's, about politics, foreign policy, banking and war. Commenters with these reactions to Saker's essay should maybe introspect a little on what is running in the minds and emotions.

    Not all neo-cons are Jewish and not all Jewish people are neo-cons. Similarly, not all Zionists are Jewish and not all Jewish persons are Zionists.

    And? Neo-conservatism is a Jewish ideology; it was founded and driven by Jews as a vehicle for Jewish ethnic interests.

    Commenters with these reactions to Saker’s essay should maybe introspect a little on what is running in the minds and emotions.

    Isn’t the appropriate response to look at the facts of the matter to determine whether opposition to Jewish influence is justified or not? What does introspection have to do with anything?

    Read More
    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @nickels


    And? Neo-conservatism is a Jewish ideology; it was founded and driven by Jews as a vehicle for Jewish ethnic interests.

     

    I would like to point out, that, as s gentile, your saying this is antisemitic.
    However Murray Friedman writing an entire book about is not. Lol.

    https://www.amazon.com/Neoconservative-Revolution-Jewish-Intellectuals-Shaping/dp/0521545013
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. The key to taking back America from the Zionists is to abolish the FED which is a privately owned Zionist creation which creates money out of thin air and loans this ether created money to the government at interest when our government should be creating the money as it had prior to 1913 and taking the control of our very lives away from the Zionists.

    Also the Zionist created IRS should also be eliminated as it was created to pay for the wars that the Zionists then got America into starting with WWI and WW2 and Vietnam and the Balkans and Iraq and Libya and Afghanistan and Syria to name just a few.

    For a look at our Zionist controlled lives and what the end result will be read Orwells 1984.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    To take back America from Jews you must first take it back from WASPs. WASP culture has always - from its hardening with the rise of the Puritans - been pro-Semitic, because Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. WASPs have always been thrilled to ally with Jews, certainly with Jewish money, in order to do major cultural damage no non-WASP whites. WASP Elites have always seen the vast majority of whites they rule as inherently inferior trash they must hold down and smack around, with the help of their Jewish BFFs.


    The source problem, the foundational problem, is WASP culture. Jews are simply the junior partner of the evil law firm who eventually took over the firm.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. @Anonymous
    The biggest slap in the face was on the Huff Post when Bannon was canned.

    Goy Bye.

    How arrogant can you get? It's like they can't contain themselves now.

    Exactly. A historical pattern that has been repeated over and over again: Jewish ruling elites failing to suppress their limitless arrogance and thereby isolating themselves. And historically we know what usually happens next.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre

    historically we know what usually happens next.
     
    Historically they've never had it wrapped up as tightly as they do now. Pretty much they own everything - virtually all the politicians, virtually all the media (including Google, FB, YouTube, Twitter). all the smartphone operating systems, the intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense and many other regulatory agencies, the banks (including the Fed), ...

    Plus they will soon have drones and AI to control them. At that point they won't have to rely on "Goy" to do their killing and controlling, they'll have a loyal and unstoppable army. And the average Americans is happily increasing surveillance and robotic powers all the time.

    No, unless there is a rather sudden awakening in the net 10 years or so, which given the degree of mind control I find quite implausible, game over.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Erebus says:
    @WJ
    Trump might be a clown show but he will be in the WH on January 1 2021. The political and legal obstacles for his removal are substantial. Perhaps he hasn't drained the swamp but he stopped funding for the Jihadis in Syria, which has essentially ended the war there. He has dramatically improved border security and he obtained a SC nominee who is not left wing crazy as the previous two.
    I am not convinced he will substantially escalate Afghanistan but we will find out perhaps this week.

    He is vastly superior to at least three of predecessors in the job and he is most certainly preferable to the horrendous Clinton/Kaine, open borders neocon clan.

    Trump might be a clown show but he will be in the WH on January 1 2021.

    David Goldman, (formerly blogging as Spengler) has an interesting thesis. To whit, that Trump’s reaction to Charlottesville will split both parties, and his populism will unite the middle against the 2 extremes. America would suddenly find itself with 3 parties, with the middle one by far the largest. I don’t know the American political climate well enough to critique this, but some here may find it interesting: http://www.atimes.com/unintended-consequences-charlottesville/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    This is certainly a plausible scenario but the more likely outcome will not so much be a splitting of the phony left-right parties, but rather a formal unification, as opposed to the current charade of opposition which Trump's candidacy exposed and (brilliantly) exploited. This is very clearly evidenced in the full display of cuckoldry of the entire Republican and movement conservative "leadership". The Republicans will have to join forces with the Democrats, who will welcome the alliance as the system requires a facade of formal (controlled) opposition politics. If Trump has any sense (an open question, I admit), he would leave the Republican Party and declare himself an Independent.
    , @Alden
    I too believe Trump will be re elected. I believe the motivation of many Trump voters is to just lash out at the democrats, anti fa, black criminals liberals and academics who hate us.

    Trump cannot help Whites. He stated several times he thinks affirmative action is "great". He is doing something about Hispanic illegal aliens.

    BUT trump does nothing about Tyson, Perdue, Kern county land company, Denny's MacDonalds every rest aunt and farmer in the country who import and employ illegal Browns If Trump were really against illegal immigration he would imprison every CEO, HR and managers in the country.

    Keep them in the city jails and state prisons with all the black and brown thugs and black and brown guards.

    Trump still wants to import more Indian and Asian educated skilled workers. To hell with him.

    Educated skilled non Whites are a bigger. threat to the White middle class than illegal hamburger flippers and gardeners.

    Why should our state universities like UCLA, Cal Berkely, Cal Davis and Irvine, Cal Polytech etc spend White American taxpayers money educating our Asian and Indian replacements?

    The non White immigrant Drs nurses medical techs engineers, accountants, software programmers and engineers are used by the elites to shove White Americans to the bottom.

    We are the most discriminated against group in America.

    BTW, every Chinese educated, skilled immigrant brings all 4 grandparents plus other elderly relatives to America to parasite on. Social security, Medicare and the other senior benefits.

    And a lot of those chain immigrants are neither 65 or related to their sponsors. 120 years ago the Chinese brought in ghost sons. Now the legal immigrant Chinese bring in ghost grandparents.

    And they all vote democrat despite the
    "Conservatism" conservatives talk about.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. USA has been extremely unbelievably lucky. The whole hegemony fell into USA hands like a ripen fruit after all of powers were ruined by successive WWI and II. USA has not even put much effort so easy that was. Easy comes easy goes as saying goes. Undeserved leadership did not last as due to psychology of a spoiled child USA plainly could not behave wisely with restrain to allow this moment to last.
    USA got lucky with soviet Union truly word number one military power. And here this whole thing went to America head and it lost it started behaving like crazy loon undermining own position at every turn. However every lucky streak sooner or later runs out. So called superpower as it turns utterly incapable to fight and win not only against peers like Russia and China where USA has no chance at all.
    Forfeiting economic power USA is left with military pillar which is lacking and financial pillar. With financial part being the most important. The moment this pillar falls and it will, USA will shrink to very local status. the sooner the better. The most important is to keep all things conventional and keep USA pinned and preoccupied until until USA cannot do no more harm.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  49. Jake says:

    Neocons are uniquely evil, rather like Bolsheviks and Nazis.

    Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern type Liberals are not evil. They are stupidly naive, and stubborn in that naive stupidity, which means they are easily manipulated by Marxists. But they are not evil.

    Neocons are just evil. Trotsky type evil.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Neocons are uniquely evil, rather like Bolsheviks and Nazis.
     
    In what sense were the Nazis evil? They were facing grave dangers from the Reds of all stripes, and the international bankster cartels to name only two sources of it.

    The Democrats and the Republicans on the other hand, never faced such an existential threat and smashed Germany and Japan for glory and profit in a war Churchill itself admitted was unnecessary.Therefore, they are morally much worse than either Germany or the other anti-Bolshies, Japan.

    Here's an excellent anti-propaganda primer. It's short and brilliantly written by a true master.

    “… this entire myth, so prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is either completely untrue or not entirely the truth.
    If people should learn this intellectual fraud about Hitler's Germany, then they will begin to ask questions, and searching questions…”

    - Murray Rothbard, Review of The Origins of the Second World War, 1966

    http://mises.org/daily/2592

     

    Here's how wars start, and the Nazis were up against this.

    Wars are inevitable, Dickinson declared, for they arise out of commercial competition between nations.

    Murray N. Rothbard, Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy.
    This first appeared in World Market Perspective (1984)
    https://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard66.html


     

    Woody Wilson also confirmed it and so did Thucydides.

    This war, in its inception was a commercial and industrial war. It was not a political war.

    -Woodrow Wilson, Address at the Coliseum in St. Louis, Missouri, September 5, 1919
    http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=117365
     

    Please note that WW2 was basically an extension of WW1, which was a crime perpetrated by some real goofballs, and they were not Germans. Several good references to back up that claim if interested.

    "The cause of all these evils was the lust for power arising from greed and ambition; and from these passions proceeded the violence of parties once engaged in contention."[58]

    Thucydides--History of the Pelopponesian War (431 BCE)

    From Book III, concerning the Corcyrean Revolution
    http://www.wright.edu/~christopher.oldstone-moore/Thucydides.htm
     

    It's illuminating to read the whole passage from which that quote was taken. Spells out how stupid people in power can be.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. @Johnny Rico
    Sure.

    You may be simply be reaching a personal tipping-point from all the fear-mongering and apocalyptic race-war/civil-war nonsense that has had its ups-and-downs the last year-and-a-half, but which has hit record heights after Charlottesville. Hysterical group-think.

    You have always been a “predictor.” Laying out various scenarios and then going back every few months to try to fit what you said to what happened. This can quickly become self-deluded back-patting.

    You have been correct I think in certain respects and your analysis has usually been top-notch even if it doesn’t always cover all angles.

    But your record forecasting or predicting is just as bad as everybody else’s. We can’t predict. Not the price of oil. Not the lottery. Not the Super-bowl. Not the weather more than 5 days out. Not war. And not war’s unintended consequences.

    Three weeks ago nobody cared about Southern statues or White Supremacists. Two weeks from now nobody will care anymore again. Two weeks ago we were going to nuke North Korea. Now they are not in the news.

    Imagine if that one girl hadn’t been killed by that one guy at the protest or counter-protest. It doesn't even matter. Nobody will remember her name in a month. But everybody knows who Kim Kardashian is.

    This last 6 months has been, in my opinion, a classic case of the result of cognitive dissonance that occurs when prophecy fails. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Prophecy_Fails

    The prophecy in this case was that Trump was the next Hitler. This and the lingering, very strong sour grapes.

    The whole Russia-Gate thing is slowly being exposed as a hoax but we may still have a case of “some stories are true that never happened.” A huge number of people will never think of Trump anyway other than how they do now no matter what he does or what happens – as evil, or incompetent, or immoral, or whatever.

    I am rather partial to Andrew Bacevich’s analysis that suggests Trump is actually apolitical and non-ideological.

    I think we have been in a very slow, shallow decline since about 1969. Barely noticeable. Bursts of innovation and growth have distracted the country from the fact that the standard of living for 80% of everybody has not really improved. It is unlikely that Trump will reverse this.

    People have been predicting collapse for decades. Read James Howard Kunstler. http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/total-eclipse/

    It kind of happened in 2008-2009.
    Look at the current collapse of large parts of the retail sector.

    Not surprisingly, few are predicting Trump will be in office in 2020 and that the world will look a lot like 2007 at that point. But that is where my money is.

    If "Antifa" continues to wear wear black ninja outfits and masks and continues to use violence, the State will have to crush them.

    Same old, same old. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Something like that.

    I live in Boston. I was 100 yards away from the first bomb that went off at the 2013 Marathon. I saw the National Security State response over the next week. The State Police with a LOT of support did not mess around. Over the years I have seen how the Boston and State police deal with protests and gatherings of all types. Boston is a very safe city. It is difficult to envision what happened in Charlottesville happening here.

    The Boston Marathon bombing was a false flag perpetrated by the deep state, for details see Rense.com, Veteranstoday.com, Globalresearch.ca, Davidicke.com, Whatreallyhappened.com, etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Jake says:
    @DESERT FOX
    The key to taking back America from the Zionists is to abolish the FED which is a privately owned Zionist creation which creates money out of thin air and loans this ether created money to the government at interest when our government should be creating the money as it had prior to 1913 and taking the control of our very lives away from the Zionists.

    Also the Zionist created IRS should also be eliminated as it was created to pay for the wars that the Zionists then got America into starting with WWI and WW2 and Vietnam and the Balkans and Iraq and Libya and Afghanistan and Syria to name just a few.

    For a look at our Zionist controlled lives and what the end result will be read Orwells 1984.

    To take back America from Jews you must first take it back from WASPs. WASP culture has always – from its hardening with the rise of the Puritans – been pro-Semitic, because Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. WASPs have always been thrilled to ally with Jews, certainly with Jewish money, in order to do major cultural damage no non-WASP whites. WASP Elites have always seen the vast majority of whites they rule as inherently inferior trash they must hold down and smack around, with the help of their Jewish BFFs.

    The source problem, the foundational problem, is WASP culture. Jews are simply the junior partner of the evil law firm who eventually took over the firm.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    These are valid points but your last paragraph seems contradictory: regardless of where Jews started (e.g. as exploitative middle men in service of the medieval nobility), they are clearly now in charge, as you seem to admit. So who really is the problem here?
    , @SolontoCroesus
    Jake,
    Do you know good sources/information for a relationship between Anglo commitment to Hebrew scripture linked to the rise of the Bank of England?

    from my limited knowledge/understanding, the creation of the Bank of England changed everything.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?315240-1/us-economists-won-world-war-ii
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    The Boston Marathon bombing was a false flag perpetrated by the deep state, for details see Rense.com, Veteranstoday.com, Globalresearch.ca, Davidicke.com, Whatreallyhappened.com, etc

    .
    Yeah. I’ll never forget that fairly calm looking “victim” with the leg supposedly blown off at the knee except for part of the bone, being wheeled away from the carnage, looking surprisingly ok. I mean–where was the follow-up? News about his prosthetics?
    Charlottesville was another psyop, complete with crisis actors and the necessary martyr to white perfidy. This follows like pieces on the chess board. Black lives matter. White lives matter. Checkmate. Rico is right, but still–it doesn’t play out exactly as predicted; but it is predictable in a general way if you know the patterns and who is trying to play the chess game.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DESERT FOX
    Other false false flags were SandyHook the school was closed in 2008 etc., for details see Wolfgang Halbigs reports, San Bernadino was another false flag, Orlando was another, Aurora theater was another,all deep state operations .

    In regards to the false flags in Europe they are perpetrated by NATO and their OPERATION GLADIO agent provocateurs, and behind it all is the NWO Zionist Cabal.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. @anonymous

    The Boston Marathon bombing was a false flag perpetrated by the deep state, for details see Rense.com, Veteranstoday.com, Globalresearch.ca, Davidicke.com, Whatreallyhappened.com, etc
     
    .
    Yeah. I'll never forget that fairly calm looking "victim" with the leg supposedly blown off at the knee except for part of the bone, being wheeled away from the carnage, looking surprisingly ok. I mean--where was the follow-up? News about his prosthetics?
    Charlottesville was another psyop, complete with crisis actors and the necessary martyr to white perfidy. This follows like pieces on the chess board. Black lives matter. White lives matter. Checkmate. Rico is right, but still--it doesn't play out exactly as predicted; but it is predictable in a general way if you know the patterns and who is trying to play the chess game.

    Other false false flags were SandyHook the school was closed in 2008 etc., for details see Wolfgang Halbigs reports, San Bernadino was another false flag, Orlando was another, Aurora theater was another,all deep state operations .

    In regards to the false flags in Europe they are perpetrated by NATO and their OPERATION GLADIO agent provocateurs, and behind it all is the NWO Zionist Cabal.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. Cyrano says:

    If the deep state removes Trump, it will show how truly superior democracy is over any other political system. It will show that democracy has mechanism to correct the mistakes that voters do at election. Which begs the question – why bother with elections? Just have the deep state select its candidate and get over with it. Actually, that’s exactly what elections are – you get to choose between two pre approved and vetted candidates by the deep state. Occasionally, a mishap happens.

    If the deep state goes for removal of Trump, they will show that not only that they are capable of mishandling every foreign policy issue that they could lay their hands on, but they are capable of doing the same for domestic policy too. I would tell the neocons to be careful, this one could have consequences, unlike the foreign policy debacles where they treated the world like a fantasy playground where no matter how badly they screwed up, they were never held accountable.

    The neocons think that they have done an excellent work preparing the ground by portraying Trump as a traitor, nazi, incompetent and so on, so when they remove him, they think that they would look like saviors to the Americans. Be careful with that one. They think that they have the numbers too.

    Their rallies have ten times the numbers of the rallies by the undesirable ones. Those numbers could be misleading. Not everybody shows up at those rallies. There is a lot of strong silent type of element there. People who bear a lot of resentment against the establishment, but still don’t want to show up in public and be smeared by the neocons.

    American establishment is grossly misreading the public. The last 2 elections showed that Americans want change. They got duped in the previous election, the only change they got was some extra melanin. And the deep state was preparing the same trick for this one too – some extra estrogen was supposed to do the trick this time.

    I think that Americans want some real meaningful change, not some cosmetic type. Removing Trump and replacing him with one of the deep state clones, might not be the change that the Americans were looking for.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  55. @Jake
    To take back America from Jews you must first take it back from WASPs. WASP culture has always - from its hardening with the rise of the Puritans - been pro-Semitic, because Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. WASPs have always been thrilled to ally with Jews, certainly with Jewish money, in order to do major cultural damage no non-WASP whites. WASP Elites have always seen the vast majority of whites they rule as inherently inferior trash they must hold down and smack around, with the help of their Jewish BFFs.


    The source problem, the foundational problem, is WASP culture. Jews are simply the junior partner of the evil law firm who eventually took over the firm.

    These are valid points but your last paragraph seems contradictory: regardless of where Jews started (e.g. as exploitative middle men in service of the medieval nobility), they are clearly now in charge, as you seem to admit. So who really is the problem here?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. @Erebus

    Trump might be a clown show but he will be in the WH on January 1 2021.
     
    David Goldman, (formerly blogging as Spengler) has an interesting thesis. To whit, that Trump's reaction to Charlottesville will split both parties, and his populism will unite the middle against the 2 extremes. America would suddenly find itself with 3 parties, with the middle one by far the largest. I don't know the American political climate well enough to critique this, but some here may find it interesting: http://www.atimes.com/unintended-consequences-charlottesville/

    This is certainly a plausible scenario but the more likely outcome will not so much be a splitting of the phony left-right parties, but rather a formal unification, as opposed to the current charade of opposition which Trump’s candidacy exposed and (brilliantly) exploited. This is very clearly evidenced in the full display of cuckoldry of the entire Republican and movement conservative “leadership”. The Republicans will have to join forces with the Democrats, who will welcome the alliance as the system requires a facade of formal (controlled) opposition politics. If Trump has any sense (an open question, I admit), he would leave the Republican Party and declare himself an Independent.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Erebus
    At the Party level, they seem to be allied already, at least nationally.

    I think Goldman's thesis is that both parties have wandered so far from their respective bases, that their vulnerability at the electorate level is showing. The Civil War monuments question is exposing their flanks, and catalysing the dissonance between them and their bases.
    Both "Centre-left" and "Centre-Right", (aka: the "Silent Majority") have been left behind and they both know it. The Silent Majority, both black and white, favours keeping the Civil War monuments as they are, and Trump's question: "Where do you stop?", resonates across the broadest part of the Dem-Rep divide. If he works that into other issues that can unite the broad spectrum centre, an enormous political movement can form almost organically.

    Does it resonate loudly enough to create the necessary schisms? I don't know, but Goldman thinks so. If he's right, an Independent coming up the middle can quite suddenly pull the carpet out from under both parties. It would be a massive tectonic shift in American politics. Trump may well not be around to take advantage of it, but he's opened the field.

    Anyhow, Goldman's take on what's happening is interesting and has that odd feel of being "on the money".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. peterAUS says:

    A dilemma.

    To point to a lot of nonsense in the article and most of the comments or just keep all that slide.

    Let’s do the later.

    What the Saker is doing is good. It’s mostly factually incorrect, but the intention is good.
    It’s like telling kids fantasy stories to make them not doing stupid and dangerous things.

    Most of the comments are, as always, just online therapy and that’s good too.

    Bottom line: the best way to prevent future Empire’s wars is to keep an average American scared of consequences for him/her or people he/she cares for.
    So, maybe toning down bad things that can happen to South Koreans and Japanese, or anybody else, could maybe help in future articles. Especially numbers. Focus on individual family, or family pets.
    Mostly focus on “how bad that could be for ME” (me being an average American) and “managing perceptions” would work better.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Ah, the burdens you must bear. I can only hope appropriate gratitude for your concern is forthcoming.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. @Jake
    To take back America from Jews you must first take it back from WASPs. WASP culture has always - from its hardening with the rise of the Puritans - been pro-Semitic, because Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. WASPs have always been thrilled to ally with Jews, certainly with Jewish money, in order to do major cultural damage no non-WASP whites. WASP Elites have always seen the vast majority of whites they rule as inherently inferior trash they must hold down and smack around, with the help of their Jewish BFFs.


    The source problem, the foundational problem, is WASP culture. Jews are simply the junior partner of the evil law firm who eventually took over the firm.

    Jake,
    Do you know good sources/information for a relationship between Anglo commitment to Hebrew scripture linked to the rise of the Bank of England?

    from my limited knowledge/understanding, the creation of the Bank of England changed everything.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?315240-1/us-economists-won-world-war-ii

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. peterAUS says:
    @Felix Keverich
    I have to say, what a spectacular failure president Trump has been! Could you imagine that a 70 year old billionare could be so...helpless?

    How come a president, who won 65 million votes, cannot get a single man in his administration who shares his political views? Why is Trump admin full of people, who despise Trump. SAD.

    He did run a spirited campaign though.

    Two reasons, maybe.

    He failed to keep those people mobilized.
    His opposition didn’t make that mistake.

    Those people thought that casting a vote will solve all their problems.
    They failed to get organized into mass support of Trump and his policies.

    Maybe they (people) will learn something from this mistake.
    Maybe not.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Felix Keverich
    My point is Trump has shown himself to be remarkably clueless as an administrator.

    I still don't understand why he is filling his cabinet with the people who hate him! It started before Trump was even inaugurated. Trump's personell choices display his lack of understanding about politics, or human relationships for that matter.

    Consider his NSA for instance. Trump could have plucked any random person off the street and he would still make a better choice than McMaster, if only because such person would be owing his job to Trump personally. By contrast, McMaster was groomed by the neocons for a long time, owes his entire career to them, so his loyalty is to the neocons, not Trump.

    The end result is that president Trump is being isolated within his own administration. It would be funny, if it wasn't so pathetic.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. nsa says:
    @Tulips
    I am surprised by the anti-Semitism in the comments. Reading these comments causes me to think that Canada, Mexico, Cuba, and other near-by nations should have contingency plans for Jewish refugees fleeing the USA. Not all neo-cons are Jewish and not all Jewish people are neo-cons. Similarly, not all Zionists are Jewish and not all Jewish persons are Zionists. It looks like there is a deep dislike or fear that is easily triggered by critical political essays, like Saker's, about politics, foreign policy, banking and war. Commenters with these reactions to Saker's essay should maybe introspect a little on what is running in the minds and emotions.

    What’s “running in the minds and emotions” is shoving you into an oven and setting the dial to extra crispy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tulips
    The comments of DFH and nsa prove my point. Try to put the anti-Semitism into a syllogism:

    Some Jewish people are neo-conservatives.
    Most neo-conservatives are Jewish.
    Ergo, all Jewish people are bad.

    That is the illogic of the anti-Semitism in these commentaries.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. Caterina says: • Website

    Time to hunt down the Neocons and end their influence (wink, wink)
    This is what our Founding Fathers did to the traitorous tories.
    Back then, just 15% of the population was active in throwing out the royalists.
    We need a purge.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  62. Caterina says:
    @white noise
    "How come a president, who won 65 million votes, cannot get a single man in his administration who shares his political views?"

    As someone mentioned here, due to Jewish infestation. And because weak people sell their souls easily in exchange of money and goods. And there are a lot of weak people.

    Drop the anti-Jewish bigotry and I’d agree.

    Read More
    • Replies: @DFH

    Drop the anti-Jewish bigotry and I’d agree.
     
    Maybe when Jews stop with the anti-goy bigotry
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    If he'd said influence instead of infestation, would you have found the statement more palatable?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. @peterAUS
    A dilemma.

    To point to a lot of nonsense in the article and most of the comments or just keep all that slide.

    Let's do the later.

    What the Saker is doing is good. It's mostly factually incorrect, but the intention is good.
    It's like telling kids fantasy stories to make them not doing stupid and dangerous things.

    Most of the comments are, as always, just online therapy and that's good too.

    Bottom line: the best way to prevent future Empire's wars is to keep an average American scared of consequences for him/her or people he/she cares for.
    So, maybe toning down bad things that can happen to South Koreans and Japanese, or anybody else, could maybe help in future articles. Especially numbers. Focus on individual family, or family pets.
    Mostly focus on "how bad that could be for ME" (me being an average American) and "managing perceptions" would work better.

    Ah, the burdens you must bear. I can only hope appropriate gratitude for your concern is forthcoming.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Quentin says:

    And English speakers say ‘when the cat’s away, the mice wil play.’ Maybe they even dance, too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  65. DFH says:
    @Caterina
    Drop the anti-Jewish bigotry and I'd agree.

    Drop the anti-Jewish bigotry and I’d agree.

    Maybe when Jews stop with the anti-goy bigotry

    Read More
    • Replies: @EugeneGur
    When in doubt, blame the Jews? This is exactly the stupid knee-jerk response the elites are hoping for. We must be smarter if we want the humanity (including ourselves) to survive.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Bill Clinton is a filthy cockroach….

    Hillary Clinton is a filthy cockroach….

    John Podesta is a filthy cockroach…

    The Antifa are filthy cockroaches…..

    Read More
    • Agree: Che Guava
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  67. EugeneGur says:

    Neocons are just hired talking heads of the faction of the US elites directly profiting from MIC. Blaming them is like blaming puppets instead of the puppeteers.
    The key problem is that those elites making fat profits via MIC got carried away, due to either their false sense of impunity or their utter stupidity. Indeed, when God wishes to punish a country, he takes away the minds of its elite. These elites do (and always did) control the US government directly and the US armed forces via the government. So they might provoke a crisis fatal for humanity (including them, even though some might question the humanity of figures like Soros). The only credible strategy to prevent this Mutual Assured Destruction (it was abbreviated MAD for a reason) is to punch the US military in the face in a way that cannot be misinterpreted, in Syria, North Korea, or elsewhere. After all, the Vietnam fiasco brought the US elites to their senses for a few decades.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  68. EugeneGur says:
    @DFH

    Drop the anti-Jewish bigotry and I’d agree.
     
    Maybe when Jews stop with the anti-goy bigotry

    When in doubt, blame the Jews? This is exactly the stupid knee-jerk response the elites are hoping for. We must be smarter if we want the humanity (including ourselves) to survive.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Except there really isn't much doubt about who deserves the lion's share of the blame, is there? Of course, we should take care to distinguish between Organized Jewry and ordinary, individual Jews, but that's not really the point here.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Alden says:
    @Johnny Rico
    Sure.

    You may be simply be reaching a personal tipping-point from all the fear-mongering and apocalyptic race-war/civil-war nonsense that has had its ups-and-downs the last year-and-a-half, but which has hit record heights after Charlottesville. Hysterical group-think.

    You have always been a “predictor.” Laying out various scenarios and then going back every few months to try to fit what you said to what happened. This can quickly become self-deluded back-patting.

    You have been correct I think in certain respects and your analysis has usually been top-notch even if it doesn’t always cover all angles.

    But your record forecasting or predicting is just as bad as everybody else’s. We can’t predict. Not the price of oil. Not the lottery. Not the Super-bowl. Not the weather more than 5 days out. Not war. And not war’s unintended consequences.

    Three weeks ago nobody cared about Southern statues or White Supremacists. Two weeks from now nobody will care anymore again. Two weeks ago we were going to nuke North Korea. Now they are not in the news.

    Imagine if that one girl hadn’t been killed by that one guy at the protest or counter-protest. It doesn't even matter. Nobody will remember her name in a month. But everybody knows who Kim Kardashian is.

    This last 6 months has been, in my opinion, a classic case of the result of cognitive dissonance that occurs when prophecy fails. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Prophecy_Fails

    The prophecy in this case was that Trump was the next Hitler. This and the lingering, very strong sour grapes.

    The whole Russia-Gate thing is slowly being exposed as a hoax but we may still have a case of “some stories are true that never happened.” A huge number of people will never think of Trump anyway other than how they do now no matter what he does or what happens – as evil, or incompetent, or immoral, or whatever.

    I am rather partial to Andrew Bacevich’s analysis that suggests Trump is actually apolitical and non-ideological.

    I think we have been in a very slow, shallow decline since about 1969. Barely noticeable. Bursts of innovation and growth have distracted the country from the fact that the standard of living for 80% of everybody has not really improved. It is unlikely that Trump will reverse this.

    People have been predicting collapse for decades. Read James Howard Kunstler. http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/total-eclipse/

    It kind of happened in 2008-2009.
    Look at the current collapse of large parts of the retail sector.

    Not surprisingly, few are predicting Trump will be in office in 2020 and that the world will look a lot like 2007 at that point. But that is where my money is.

    If "Antifa" continues to wear wear black ninja outfits and masks and continues to use violence, the State will have to crush them.

    Same old, same old. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Something like that.

    I live in Boston. I was 100 yards away from the first bomb that went off at the 2013 Marathon. I saw the National Security State response over the next week. The State Police with a LOT of support did not mess around. Over the years I have seen how the Boston and State police deal with protests and gatherings of all types. Boston is a very safe city. It is difficult to envision what happened in Charlottesville happening here.

    The difference is that the Mayor of Boston and the Governor of Massachusetts didn’t order the police to stand down as the Virginia authorities did.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @Caterina
    Drop the anti-Jewish bigotry and I'd agree.

    If he’d said influence instead of infestation, would you have found the statement more palatable?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. EugeneGur says:
    @WJ
    Trump might be a clown show but he will be in the WH on January 1 2021. The political and legal obstacles for his removal are substantial. Perhaps he hasn't drained the swamp but he stopped funding for the Jihadis in Syria, which has essentially ended the war there. He has dramatically improved border security and he obtained a SC nominee who is not left wing crazy as the previous two.
    I am not convinced he will substantially escalate Afghanistan but we will find out perhaps this week.

    He is vastly superior to at least three of predecessors in the job and he is most certainly preferable to the horrendous Clinton/Kaine, open borders neocon clan.

    Trump sure is better than Hillary, but that’s not such a big achievement: I can think of very few people who are worse than her. He did not fulfill his key promise, though: stop foreign policy BS and deal with the US problems at home (infrastructure, manufacturing, education, health care, etc.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @c matt
    He did not fulfill his key promise(s) yet, but that is not from a lack of trying. Kind of difficult to get much done when you are Trump contra mundum.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Cyrano says:

    That regime change business could be addictive. After so many disastrous regime changes abroad, at one point you lose touch with reality and you attempt one at home too.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  73. @Jake
    Neocons are uniquely evil, rather like Bolsheviks and Nazis.

    Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern type Liberals are not evil. They are stupidly naive, and stubborn in that naive stupidity, which means they are easily manipulated by Marxists. But they are not evil.

    Neocons are just evil. Trotsky type evil.

    Neocons are uniquely evil, rather like Bolsheviks and Nazis.

    In what sense were the Nazis evil? They were facing grave dangers from the Reds of all stripes, and the international bankster cartels to name only two sources of it.

    The Democrats and the Republicans on the other hand, never faced such an existential threat and smashed Germany and Japan for glory and profit in a war Churchill itself admitted was unnecessary.Therefore, they are morally much worse than either Germany or the other anti-Bolshies, Japan.

    Here’s an excellent anti-propaganda primer. It’s short and brilliantly written by a true master.

    “… this entire myth, so prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is either completely untrue or not entirely the truth.
    If people should learn this intellectual fraud about Hitler’s Germany, then they will begin to ask questions, and searching questions…”

    - Murray Rothbard, Review of The Origins of the Second World War, 1966

    http://mises.org/daily/2592

    Here’s how wars start, and the Nazis were up against this.

    Wars are inevitable, Dickinson declared, for they arise out of commercial competition between nations.

    Murray N. Rothbard, Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy.
    This first appeared in World Market Perspective (1984)

    https://archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard66.html

    Woody Wilson also confirmed it and so did Thucydides.

    This war, in its inception was a commercial and industrial war. It was not a political war.

    -Woodrow Wilson, Address at the Coliseum in St. Louis, Missouri, September 5, 1919

    http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=117365

    Please note that WW2 was basically an extension of WW1, which was a crime perpetrated by some real goofballs, and they were not Germans. Several good references to back up that claim if interested.

    “The cause of all these evils was the lust for power arising from greed and ambition; and from these passions proceeded the violence of parties once engaged in contention.”[58]

    Thucydides–History of the Pelopponesian War (431 BCE)

    From Book III, concerning the Corcyrean Revolution

    http://www.wright.edu/~christopher.oldstone-moore/Thucydides.htm

    It’s illuminating to read the whole passage from which that quote was taken. Spells out how stupid people in power can be.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. Oscar says:

    Saker

    You are puzzling in that you know about ZOG but attack “ukronazis”

    1. they are not all nazis as there are many jewish oligarchs running that country, just as they do in Putin’s Russia
    2. the “nazis” perhaps aren’t too happy that the shabbas goim russians participated in the wholesale murder of millions of their christinan ukranian forefathers led by their judeo-bolshevik masters
    3. perhaps the poles feel same way about Katyn, I don’t see any Russian persecution of those who did that

    Saker, how about a little more introspection, I guess people should just shrug off the role the shabbas goim russians played, they still hold up stalin as a most admired person

    You should read Francis Parker Yockey book Imperium written in 1948 where he says Russians after communism might be salvation of the West.. although while they are run by jewish oligarchs and kill fellow whites in Ukraine not seeing that

    PS if Putin such a statesman he would see the Ukranian squabble for some God forsaken land as BS while the declining Russian population has vast territories in the east which one day the Chinese by force or by immigration will end up owning

    Read More
    • Replies: @Felix Keverich

    PS if Putin such a statesman he would see the Ukranian squabble for some God forsaken land as BS while the declining Russian population has vast territories in the east which one day the Chinese by force or by immigration will end up owning
     
    As a Russian, allow me to educate you on this topic:

    "vast territories in the east" - it really is the "godforsaken land". It ended up Russian because no one else wanted it. Chinese had millenia to settle the Far East. They didn't, because they didn't want it. They still don't want it. Chinese immigration is a myth.

    The Ukraine is a territory where Russia originated a thousand years ago; its cultural, geopolitical significance cannot be overstated.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. Alden says:
    @Erebus

    Trump might be a clown show but he will be in the WH on January 1 2021.
     
    David Goldman, (formerly blogging as Spengler) has an interesting thesis. To whit, that Trump's reaction to Charlottesville will split both parties, and his populism will unite the middle against the 2 extremes. America would suddenly find itself with 3 parties, with the middle one by far the largest. I don't know the American political climate well enough to critique this, but some here may find it interesting: http://www.atimes.com/unintended-consequences-charlottesville/

    I too believe Trump will be re elected. I believe the motivation of many Trump voters is to just lash out at the democrats, anti fa, black criminals liberals and academics who hate us.

    Trump cannot help Whites. He stated several times he thinks affirmative action is “great”. He is doing something about Hispanic illegal aliens.

    BUT trump does nothing about Tyson, Perdue, Kern county land company, Denny’s MacDonalds every rest aunt and farmer in the country who import and employ illegal Browns If Trump were really against illegal immigration he would imprison every CEO, HR and managers in the country.

    Keep them in the city jails and state prisons with all the black and brown thugs and black and brown guards.

    Trump still wants to import more Indian and Asian educated skilled workers. To hell with him.

    Educated skilled non Whites are a bigger. threat to the White middle class than illegal hamburger flippers and gardeners.

    Why should our state universities like UCLA, Cal Berkely, Cal Davis and Irvine, Cal Polytech etc spend White American taxpayers money educating our Asian and Indian replacements?

    The non White immigrant Drs nurses medical techs engineers, accountants, software programmers and engineers are used by the elites to shove White Americans to the bottom.

    We are the most discriminated against group in America.

    BTW, every Chinese educated, skilled immigrant brings all 4 grandparents plus other elderly relatives to America to parasite on. Social security, Medicare and the other senior benefits.

    And a lot of those chain immigrants are neither 65 or related to their sponsors. 120 years ago the Chinese brought in ghost sons. Now the legal immigrant Chinese bring in ghost grandparents.

    And they all vote democrat despite the
    “Conservatism” conservatives talk about.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. @EugeneGur
    When in doubt, blame the Jews? This is exactly the stupid knee-jerk response the elites are hoping for. We must be smarter if we want the humanity (including ourselves) to survive.

    Except there really isn’t much doubt about who deserves the lion’s share of the blame, is there? Of course, we should take care to distinguish between Organized Jewry and ordinary, individual Jews, but that’s not really the point here.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. @peterAUS
    Two reasons, maybe.

    He failed to keep those people mobilized.
    His opposition didn't make that mistake.

    Those people thought that casting a vote will solve all their problems.
    They failed to get organized into mass support of Trump and his policies.

    Maybe they (people) will learn something from this mistake.
    Maybe not.

    My point is Trump has shown himself to be remarkably clueless as an administrator.

    I still don’t understand why he is filling his cabinet with the people who hate him! It started before Trump was even inaugurated. Trump’s personell choices display his lack of understanding about politics, or human relationships for that matter.

    Consider his NSA for instance. Trump could have plucked any random person off the street and he would still make a better choice than McMaster, if only because such person would be owing his job to Trump personally. By contrast, McMaster was groomed by the neocons for a long time, owes his entire career to them, so his loyalty is to the neocons, not Trump.

    The end result is that president Trump is being isolated within his own administration. It would be funny, if it wasn’t so pathetic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    My point is Trump has shown himself to be remarkably clueless as an administrator.

    I still don’t understand why he is filling his cabinet with the people who hate him! It started before Trump was even inaugurated. Trump’s personell choices display his lack of understanding about politics, or human relationships for that matter.
     
    Agree.

    The end result is that president Trump is being isolated within his own administration. It would be funny, if it wasn’t so pathetic.

     

    Agree.

    But, well, I wouldn't blame only Trump himself for that.
    It's the job of people around him to try to help, influence...stuff like that.

    My point is that focusing on a person, Trump or whoever, is just wrong.
    Or right, depends what side you are on.

    Presidency is much more than one person. Or at least it should be.

    My...feeling.....is that from the very beginning all that effort has been.....how to put it......childish.
    We are not happy->who is promising to fix it->HIM, great,let's vote for HIM and all our problems will go away, we simply can get back to our daily routines.

    Well....NO.....

    Trump obviously failed.
    But people around him failed too.

    I am not a politician (far away from it) but as soon as Dems started organizing all their s**t I really expected Trump supporters to do...something...like that.
    Do..................SOMETHING.

    Get organized, get numbers, get on the streets....keep communicating with Trump administration and other way around.....I mean, simple, basic, movement.

    Well, now we have what we have because we were lazy and/or incompetent.

    Simple.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Wally says: • Website

    What has happened is that Jews were thrown out for their despicable behavior.

    They now, however, have “that shitty little country” to run & hide in.

    Forget about the impossible ’6M’ lie, that is just part of their hateful scam … as the world is now finding out.

    [MORE]

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Hatemongering Jews have been marketing the ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1869.


    see:

    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

    “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @white noise
    "What has happened is that Jews were thrown out for their despicable behavior.

    They now, however, have “that shitty little country” to run & hide in."

    Correct. Matter of fact, as the historic public records of certain European countries show, the Jews as a community have been expelled from other countries more than once...

    1) So, this is NOT the first time they try to control another nation. Again, this is a matter of public record.

    2) The records in countries like Ukraine show the Jews were involved in ritual murder of kidnapped children, and also, in Germany, the Jews practically ran the prostitution business all on their own.

    3) In this day and time, many thousands of Russian and Ukrainian women have been lured to go to Israel with false promises of good jobs, and then forced into prostitution, as practically sexual slaves.

    Again, these are matters of public record. In fact, western universities and even UN have full studies/reports in regards to point # 3. By the way, many of the girls claim that many of their 'clients' were Jewish rabbis (and that those are particularly perverted is a common remark)! You'd be surprised that these statements appear in official papers.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Erebus says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty
    This is certainly a plausible scenario but the more likely outcome will not so much be a splitting of the phony left-right parties, but rather a formal unification, as opposed to the current charade of opposition which Trump's candidacy exposed and (brilliantly) exploited. This is very clearly evidenced in the full display of cuckoldry of the entire Republican and movement conservative "leadership". The Republicans will have to join forces with the Democrats, who will welcome the alliance as the system requires a facade of formal (controlled) opposition politics. If Trump has any sense (an open question, I admit), he would leave the Republican Party and declare himself an Independent.

    At the Party level, they seem to be allied already, at least nationally.

    I think Goldman’s thesis is that both parties have wandered so far from their respective bases, that their vulnerability at the electorate level is showing. The Civil War monuments question is exposing their flanks, and catalysing the dissonance between them and their bases.
    Both “Centre-left” and “Centre-Right”, (aka: the “Silent Majority”) have been left behind and they both know it. The Silent Majority, both black and white, favours keeping the Civil War monuments as they are, and Trump’s question: “Where do you stop?”, resonates across the broadest part of the Dem-Rep divide. If he works that into other issues that can unite the broad spectrum centre, an enormous political movement can form almost organically.

    Does it resonate loudly enough to create the necessary schisms? I don’t know, but Goldman thinks so. If he’s right, an Independent coming up the middle can quite suddenly pull the carpet out from under both parties. It would be a massive tectonic shift in American politics. Trump may well not be around to take advantage of it, but he’s opened the field.

    Anyhow, Goldman’s take on what’s happening is interesting and has that odd feel of being “on the money”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    It is true that legitimate, honest leftists should be as disgusted with the corporate liberalism of the Democratic Party as principled rightists should be with the betrayals of the Republican Party. There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy. Sadly Sanders proved to be just another Jewish liberal and Trump (to this point at least) clueless. So, we shall see. But the formal, token political representatives of the Oligarchy will continue to formally unite while trying (and failing) to portray themselves as competitors. They will doubtless seek to criminalize dissent (from the right, left, middle, whatever) as the charade fails to convince.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. @Oscar
    Saker

    You are puzzling in that you know about ZOG but attack "ukronazis"

    1. they are not all nazis as there are many jewish oligarchs running that country, just as they do in Putin's Russia
    2. the "nazis" perhaps aren't too happy that the shabbas goim russians participated in the wholesale murder of millions of their christinan ukranian forefathers led by their judeo-bolshevik masters
    3. perhaps the poles feel same way about Katyn, I don't see any Russian persecution of those who did that

    Saker, how about a little more introspection, I guess people should just shrug off the role the shabbas goim russians played, they still hold up stalin as a most admired person

    You should read Francis Parker Yockey book Imperium written in 1948 where he says Russians after communism might be salvation of the West.. although while they are run by jewish oligarchs and kill fellow whites in Ukraine not seeing that

    PS if Putin such a statesman he would see the Ukranian squabble for some God forsaken land as BS while the declining Russian population has vast territories in the east which one day the Chinese by force or by immigration will end up owning

    PS if Putin such a statesman he would see the Ukranian squabble for some God forsaken land as BS while the declining Russian population has vast territories in the east which one day the Chinese by force or by immigration will end up owning

    As a Russian, allow me to educate you on this topic:

    “vast territories in the east” – it really is the “godforsaken land”. It ended up Russian because no one else wanted it. Chinese had millenia to settle the Far East. They didn’t, because they didn’t want it. They still don’t want it. Chinese immigration is a myth.

    The Ukraine is a territory where Russia originated a thousand years ago; its cultural, geopolitical significance cannot be overstated.

    Read More
    • Agree: JL
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Tulips says:
    @nsa
    What's "running in the minds and emotions" is shoving you into an oven and setting the dial to extra crispy.

    The comments of DFH and nsa prove my point. Try to put the anti-Semitism into a syllogism:

    Some Jewish people are neo-conservatives.
    Most neo-conservatives are Jewish.
    Ergo, all Jewish people are bad.

    That is the illogic of the anti-Semitism in these commentaries.

    Read More
    • Replies: @geokat62
    I prefer putting anti-Lobby sentiments into this syllogism:

    Some Jewish people participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby.
    Most activities of The Lobby are harmful to the American people.
    Ergo, all Jewish people who participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby are promoting activities that are harmful to the American people.

    That is the logic of anti-Lobby sentiments in these commentaries.
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    Whatever the particulars of neoconservatism, it shares with almost all Jewish intellectual movements (and the political attitudes of enough individual Jews to permit generalizations) the objective of pursuing particularist, Jewish interests under the guise of universalism.

    True that most American Jews are not foaming-at-the-mouth Likudniks like the neocons. But it is doubtless true that (for the most part) they share many of the neocons' key premises to some extent, on both foreign and domestic policy (such that even a conservative Jew tends to have more in common with a liberal Jew than a conservative White). Again, the question is, can we make valid generalizations without resorting to demonization? I believe so.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. peterAUS says:
    @Felix Keverich
    My point is Trump has shown himself to be remarkably clueless as an administrator.

    I still don't understand why he is filling his cabinet with the people who hate him! It started before Trump was even inaugurated. Trump's personell choices display his lack of understanding about politics, or human relationships for that matter.

    Consider his NSA for instance. Trump could have plucked any random person off the street and he would still make a better choice than McMaster, if only because such person would be owing his job to Trump personally. By contrast, McMaster was groomed by the neocons for a long time, owes his entire career to them, so his loyalty is to the neocons, not Trump.

    The end result is that president Trump is being isolated within his own administration. It would be funny, if it wasn't so pathetic.

    My point is Trump has shown himself to be remarkably clueless as an administrator.

    I still don’t understand why he is filling his cabinet with the people who hate him! It started before Trump was even inaugurated. Trump’s personell choices display his lack of understanding about politics, or human relationships for that matter.

    Agree.

    The end result is that president Trump is being isolated within his own administration. It would be funny, if it wasn’t so pathetic.

    Agree.

    But, well, I wouldn’t blame only Trump himself for that.
    It’s the job of people around him to try to help, influence…stuff like that.

    My point is that focusing on a person, Trump or whoever, is just wrong.
    Or right, depends what side you are on.

    Presidency is much more than one person. Or at least it should be.

    My…feeling…..is that from the very beginning all that effort has been…..how to put it……childish.
    We are not happy->who is promising to fix it->HIM, great,let’s vote for HIM and all our problems will go away, we simply can get back to our daily routines.

    Well….NO…..

    Trump obviously failed.
    But people around him failed too.

    I am not a politician (far away from it) but as soon as Dems started organizing all their s**t I really expected Trump supporters to do…something…like that.
    Do………………SOMETHING.

    Get organized, get numbers, get on the streets….keep communicating with Trump administration and other way around…..I mean, simple, basic, movement.

    Well, now we have what we have because we were lazy and/or incompetent.

    Simple.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Miro23

    Get organized, get numbers, get on the streets….keep communicating with Trump administration and other way around…..I mean, simple, basic, movement.

    Well, now we have what we have because we were lazy and/or incompetent.

    Simple.
     

    The rule is that action wins, and it doesn't have to be good action. Say what you like about Lenin and the Bolsheviks or Hitler and the National Socialists but they were both very focused and active.

    The US will die through disconnected whateverness.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @Erebus
    At the Party level, they seem to be allied already, at least nationally.

    I think Goldman's thesis is that both parties have wandered so far from their respective bases, that their vulnerability at the electorate level is showing. The Civil War monuments question is exposing their flanks, and catalysing the dissonance between them and their bases.
    Both "Centre-left" and "Centre-Right", (aka: the "Silent Majority") have been left behind and they both know it. The Silent Majority, both black and white, favours keeping the Civil War monuments as they are, and Trump's question: "Where do you stop?", resonates across the broadest part of the Dem-Rep divide. If he works that into other issues that can unite the broad spectrum centre, an enormous political movement can form almost organically.

    Does it resonate loudly enough to create the necessary schisms? I don't know, but Goldman thinks so. If he's right, an Independent coming up the middle can quite suddenly pull the carpet out from under both parties. It would be a massive tectonic shift in American politics. Trump may well not be around to take advantage of it, but he's opened the field.

    Anyhow, Goldman's take on what's happening is interesting and has that odd feel of being "on the money".

    It is true that legitimate, honest leftists should be as disgusted with the corporate liberalism of the Democratic Party as principled rightists should be with the betrayals of the Republican Party. There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy. Sadly Sanders proved to be just another Jewish liberal and Trump (to this point at least) clueless. So, we shall see. But the formal, token political representatives of the Oligarchy will continue to formally unite while trying (and failing) to portray themselves as competitors. They will doubtless seek to criminalize dissent (from the right, left, middle, whatever) as the charade fails to convince.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sunbeam
    "There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy."

    Are there any liberals left? Real ones I mean. Dunno maybe it was always a fount of hypocrisy but are there any people on the left that really would vote for bringing back Glass-Steagall if their vote actually could tip things?

    It's not a new theory, but in a real sense there isn't an iota's worth of difference between Lindsay Graham, Pelosi, or even Sanders. They get on the talking head shows and spout drivel; sometimes they take a dive when there are enough votes to invade Iraq or bail out Wall Street.

    But when it really counts they seem to toe the invisible line all these freaks, Democrat and Republican obey.

    I think issues like abortion and gun control are pretty much things to rile up their base, or let them strike a pose on Press The Meat.

    God, now I've done it. I've got Lindsay Graham talking on a loop in my head about Benghazi.
    , @Erebus

    There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy.
     
    An idea who's time has yet to come, but when it does, it'll be a mammoth task to keep the gates of hell from opening on American soil.
    It took 2 elderly, underestimated men to bring that idea to the spotlight, but it'll take younger, more virile, more driven men to make it happen. The trouble is that it's often those kind of men that turn into Lenins and Maos when they get a whiff of intoxicating Power.
    OTOH, maybe America needs a Cultural Revolution to drive out the memes that got her to this point in the same way China needed theirs. Like forest fires, catharsis seems to be the preferred human mechanism for driving out the rot of the old, to give space for the new. Russia and China have gone through their's. It's looking much like it'll soon be America's turn.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. MarkinLA says:
    @DFH
    That thesis doesn't make any sense. If they were afraid of antifascists then why would they create and finance them? Why does their media stoke up black resentment if that is what they wish to avoid?

    Why should they be afraid of them? Black crime doesn't affect rich whites. Even if it did, blacks are criminals for prosaic reasons that have nothing to do with BLM. Black riots have no effect on billionaire capitalists either. Its not rich white communities they burn down.

    Its not rich white communities they burn down.

    Not yet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. nickels says:
    @DFH

    Not all neo-cons are Jewish and not all Jewish people are neo-cons. Similarly, not all Zionists are Jewish and not all Jewish persons are Zionists.
     
    And? Neo-conservatism is a Jewish ideology; it was founded and driven by Jews as a vehicle for Jewish ethnic interests.

    Commenters with these reactions to Saker’s essay should maybe introspect a little on what is running in the minds and emotions.
     
    Isn't the appropriate response to look at the facts of the matter to determine whether opposition to Jewish influence is justified or not? What does introspection have to do with anything?

    And? Neo-conservatism is a Jewish ideology; it was founded and driven by Jews as a vehicle for Jewish ethnic interests.

    I would like to point out, that, as s gentile, your saying this is antisemitic.
    However Murray Friedman writing an entire book about is not. Lol.

    https://www.amazon.com/Neoconservative-Revolution-Jewish-Intellectuals-Shaping/dp/0521545013

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Miro23 says:
    @peterAUS

    My point is Trump has shown himself to be remarkably clueless as an administrator.

    I still don’t understand why he is filling his cabinet with the people who hate him! It started before Trump was even inaugurated. Trump’s personell choices display his lack of understanding about politics, or human relationships for that matter.
     
    Agree.

    The end result is that president Trump is being isolated within his own administration. It would be funny, if it wasn’t so pathetic.

     

    Agree.

    But, well, I wouldn't blame only Trump himself for that.
    It's the job of people around him to try to help, influence...stuff like that.

    My point is that focusing on a person, Trump or whoever, is just wrong.
    Or right, depends what side you are on.

    Presidency is much more than one person. Or at least it should be.

    My...feeling.....is that from the very beginning all that effort has been.....how to put it......childish.
    We are not happy->who is promising to fix it->HIM, great,let's vote for HIM and all our problems will go away, we simply can get back to our daily routines.

    Well....NO.....

    Trump obviously failed.
    But people around him failed too.

    I am not a politician (far away from it) but as soon as Dems started organizing all their s**t I really expected Trump supporters to do...something...like that.
    Do..................SOMETHING.

    Get organized, get numbers, get on the streets....keep communicating with Trump administration and other way around.....I mean, simple, basic, movement.

    Well, now we have what we have because we were lazy and/or incompetent.

    Simple.

    Get organized, get numbers, get on the streets….keep communicating with Trump administration and other way around…..I mean, simple, basic, movement.

    Well, now we have what we have because we were lazy and/or incompetent.

    Simple.

    The rule is that action wins, and it doesn’t have to be good action. Say what you like about Lenin and the Bolsheviks or Hitler and the National Socialists but they were both very focused and active.

    The US will die through disconnected whateverness.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. Sunbeam says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty
    It is true that legitimate, honest leftists should be as disgusted with the corporate liberalism of the Democratic Party as principled rightists should be with the betrayals of the Republican Party. There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy. Sadly Sanders proved to be just another Jewish liberal and Trump (to this point at least) clueless. So, we shall see. But the formal, token political representatives of the Oligarchy will continue to formally unite while trying (and failing) to portray themselves as competitors. They will doubtless seek to criminalize dissent (from the right, left, middle, whatever) as the charade fails to convince.

    “There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy.”

    Are there any liberals left? Real ones I mean. Dunno maybe it was always a fount of hypocrisy but are there any people on the left that really would vote for bringing back Glass-Steagall if their vote actually could tip things?

    It’s not a new theory, but in a real sense there isn’t an iota’s worth of difference between Lindsay Graham, Pelosi, or even Sanders. They get on the talking head shows and spout drivel; sometimes they take a dive when there are enough votes to invade Iraq or bail out Wall Street.

    But when it really counts they seem to toe the invisible line all these freaks, Democrat and Republican obey.

    I think issues like abortion and gun control are pretty much things to rile up their base, or let them strike a pose on Press The Meat.

    God, now I’ve done it. I’ve got Lindsay Graham talking on a loop in my head about Benghazi.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. geokat62 says:
    @Tulips
    The comments of DFH and nsa prove my point. Try to put the anti-Semitism into a syllogism:

    Some Jewish people are neo-conservatives.
    Most neo-conservatives are Jewish.
    Ergo, all Jewish people are bad.

    That is the illogic of the anti-Semitism in these commentaries.

    I prefer putting anti-Lobby sentiments into this syllogism:

    Some Jewish people participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby.
    Most activities of The Lobby are harmful to the American people.
    Ergo, all Jewish people who participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby are promoting activities that are harmful to the American people.

    That is the logic of anti-Lobby sentiments in these commentaries.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CalDre
    Exactly. If a Jew asks, "Is it good for the Jews"?, he's applauded.

    When a White asks, "Is it good for Whites", he is demonized.

    Jews have extreme - really extreme - "class consciousness". Whites are not allowed to have it - that's being "supremacist". Because even a small united group will defeat a large divided one. And of course Jews almost completely control the media that spits out our "values" (they are in essence the priests of this new "religion" of "secular humanism" better known as "segway into Bolshevism".

    It is also of that way with women. Feminism allows women to be class conscious and is exalted, but class conscious men are "sexist", "chauvinist" and generally despicable.

    White men, of course, are utter trash. Because White men have historically been the group that prevents Jews from seizing global power. Jews (the global oligarch ones, by design, many of the rest, because they are tribalists and support their tribal leaders, the rest aren't tribalist and don't support the agenda but it's a small minority) want them neutered.
    , @white noise
    "Ergo, all Jewish people who participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby are promoting activities that are harmful to the American people.

    That is the logic of anti-Lobby sentiments in these commentaries."

    And this logic is correct... Because 'The Lobby', as in a pro-Jewish lobby (ie AIPAC) selfishly works for the interests of Israel, not of the USA... Therefore, harmful to the American people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. Erebus says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty
    It is true that legitimate, honest leftists should be as disgusted with the corporate liberalism of the Democratic Party as principled rightists should be with the betrayals of the Republican Party. There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy. Sadly Sanders proved to be just another Jewish liberal and Trump (to this point at least) clueless. So, we shall see. But the formal, token political representatives of the Oligarchy will continue to formally unite while trying (and failing) to portray themselves as competitors. They will doubtless seek to criminalize dissent (from the right, left, middle, whatever) as the charade fails to convince.

    There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy.

    An idea who’s time has yet to come, but when it does, it’ll be a mammoth task to keep the gates of hell from opening on American soil.
    It took 2 elderly, underestimated men to bring that idea to the spotlight, but it’ll take younger, more virile, more driven men to make it happen. The trouble is that it’s often those kind of men that turn into Lenins and Maos when they get a whiff of intoxicating Power.
    OTOH, maybe America needs a Cultural Revolution to drive out the memes that got her to this point in the same way China needed theirs. Like forest fires, catharsis seems to be the preferred human mechanism for driving out the rot of the old, to give space for the new. Russia and China have gone through their’s. It’s looking much like it’ll soon be America’s turn.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump

    I had a hope like this for Denis Kucinich and Ron Paul when they stepped into the election circus years ago. Then I realized that politics spectrum must be inverted. What is on its circumference must become a middle and what is in the middle must be ejected to the margins. Mathematically speaking you want to transform a disk |z|≤1 with the mapping

    z—>1/z
     
    Only populism can perform this transformation. The z—>1/z could be a logo for the movement.

    In the case of Kucinich and Paul neither had balls to do it and Paul lacked imagination. In case of Sanders and Trump the former lacked balls while the latter lacked brain.

    The Rulers are very much aware of the danger and will do anything to prevent potential unification of the forces on the circumference. Charlottesville, in my option, could have been well planned psyop to throw anti-establsihmnet right and the anti-establishment left at each other's throats. It succeeded. This was probably fairly easy to organize as both groups are heavily penetrated and agent provocateurs are dime a dozen.

    One can dream that people who sympathize with forces like Antifa could march together with White Power against globalization and interventionism and wars and Jubilee for college loans and better jobs. They can agree on these issues. Pumping up the identity politics is such an obvious stratagem but people do not see it that way. This is the main reason the Rulers love multi-ethnic societies and will do everything to turn the mono-ethnic ones into the multi-ethnic. Divide et impera never fails.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. expatriot says:
    @virgile
    I don't think the neocons want Trump out. They want him to stay as their puppet. If he fights back and start to win then they will do everything to replace him.
    Now with the departure of the strong anti-neocon Steve Bannon, Trump is loosing more chances to resist. Getting back his strength would be a miracle.
    If Trump realizes that he has lost all power and all ways to regain it, he may want to resign and be replaced by Pence who is a weak leader. Yet Pence may object to more wars that the neocons will promote and he could pose a problem for them.
    This is why I think the neocons and the zionists want to keep a powerless Trump in 'power'

    I agree that the Neocons don’t want Trump out. I would go further and say that the Deep State wanted him in from the beginning, or at least didn’t mind having him in. The reason is they wanted to have him to blame for the crises they saw coming and for the results of their own policies. They themselves realize better than anyone just how high risk are the stratagems they have been having to resort to. They probably don’t even see total success as possible any more, and may see total failure as a real possibility. Hence the need for someone like Trump to be the fall guy.

    Read More
    • Agree: CalDre
    • Replies: @white noise
    I'll do so when the Jews drop the anti-white and anti-Christian bigotry... And I've a feeling they won't back down tomorrow morning, as they have a (nefarious) agenda.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. CalDre says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty
    Exactly. A historical pattern that has been repeated over and over again: Jewish ruling elites failing to suppress their limitless arrogance and thereby isolating themselves. And historically we know what usually happens next.

    historically we know what usually happens next.

    Historically they’ve never had it wrapped up as tightly as they do now. Pretty much they own everything – virtually all the politicians, virtually all the media (including Google, FB, YouTube, Twitter). all the smartphone operating systems, the intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense and many other regulatory agencies, the banks (including the Fed), …

    Plus they will soon have drones and AI to control them. At that point they won’t have to rely on “Goy” to do their killing and controlling, they’ll have a loyal and unstoppable army. And the average Americans is happily increasing surveillance and robotic powers all the time.

    No, unless there is a rather sudden awakening in the net 10 years or so, which given the degree of mind control I find quite implausible, game over.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    True, sadly. Don't forget recent forays into micro-chipping employees. There is a case for pessimism, but there is also the historical tendency for overplaying their hand. I suppose we shall see which effect wins out.
    , @NoseytheDuke
    Don't forget though, once the point of "game over" is reached there will be a clear out and a culling of all entities that have been useful in attaining success but who will now simply represent a threat if allowed to remain. That does usually happen 'next'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. CalDre says:
    @geokat62
    I prefer putting anti-Lobby sentiments into this syllogism:

    Some Jewish people participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby.
    Most activities of The Lobby are harmful to the American people.
    Ergo, all Jewish people who participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby are promoting activities that are harmful to the American people.

    That is the logic of anti-Lobby sentiments in these commentaries.

    Exactly. If a Jew asks, “Is it good for the Jews”?, he’s applauded.

    When a White asks, “Is it good for Whites”, he is demonized.

    Jews have extreme – really extreme – “class consciousness”. Whites are not allowed to have it – that’s being “supremacist”. Because even a small united group will defeat a large divided one. And of course Jews almost completely control the media that spits out our “values” (they are in essence the priests of this new “religion” of “secular humanism” better known as “segway into Bolshevism”.

    It is also of that way with women. Feminism allows women to be class conscious and is exalted, but class conscious men are “sexist”, “chauvinist” and generally despicable.

    White men, of course, are utter trash. Because White men have historically been the group that prevents Jews from seizing global power. Jews (the global oligarch ones, by design, many of the rest, because they are tribalists and support their tribal leaders, the rest aren’t tribalist and don’t support the agenda but it’s a small minority) want them neutered.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. utu says:
    @Erebus

    There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump to provide meaningful, united opposition to the American oligarchy.
     
    An idea who's time has yet to come, but when it does, it'll be a mammoth task to keep the gates of hell from opening on American soil.
    It took 2 elderly, underestimated men to bring that idea to the spotlight, but it'll take younger, more virile, more driven men to make it happen. The trouble is that it's often those kind of men that turn into Lenins and Maos when they get a whiff of intoxicating Power.
    OTOH, maybe America needs a Cultural Revolution to drive out the memes that got her to this point in the same way China needed theirs. Like forest fires, catharsis seems to be the preferred human mechanism for driving out the rot of the old, to give space for the new. Russia and China have gone through their's. It's looking much like it'll soon be America's turn.

    There was brief hope that someone like Sanders could cooperate with someone like Trump

    I had a hope like this for Denis Kucinich and Ron Paul when they stepped into the election circus years ago. Then I realized that politics spectrum must be inverted. What is on its circumference must become a middle and what is in the middle must be ejected to the margins. Mathematically speaking you want to transform a disk |z|≤1 with the mapping

    z—>1/z

    Only populism can perform this transformation. The z—>1/z could be a logo for the movement.

    In the case of Kucinich and Paul neither had balls to do it and Paul lacked imagination. In case of Sanders and Trump the former lacked balls while the latter lacked brain.

    The Rulers are very much aware of the danger and will do anything to prevent potential unification of the forces on the circumference. Charlottesville, in my option, could have been well planned psyop to throw anti-establsihmnet right and the anti-establishment left at each other’s throats. It succeeded. This was probably fairly easy to organize as both groups are heavily penetrated and agent provocateurs are dime a dozen.

    One can dream that people who sympathize with forces like Antifa could march together with White Power against globalization and interventionism and wars and Jubilee for college loans and better jobs. They can agree on these issues. Pumping up the identity politics is such an obvious stratagem but people do not see it that way. This is the main reason the Rulers love multi-ethnic societies and will do everything to turn the mono-ethnic ones into the multi-ethnic. Divide et impera never fails.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @expatriot
    I agree that the Neocons don't want Trump out. I would go further and say that the Deep State wanted him in from the beginning, or at least didn't mind having him in. The reason is they wanted to have him to blame for the crises they saw coming and for the results of their own policies. They themselves realize better than anyone just how high risk are the stratagems they have been having to resort to. They probably don't even see total success as possible any more, and may see total failure as a real possibility. Hence the need for someone like Trump to be the fall guy.

    I’ll do so when the Jews drop the anti-white and anti-Christian bigotry… And I’ve a feeling they won’t back down tomorrow morning, as they have a (nefarious) agenda.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. @Tulips
    I am surprised by the anti-Semitism in the comments. Reading these comments causes me to think that Canada, Mexico, Cuba, and other near-by nations should have contingency plans for Jewish refugees fleeing the USA. Not all neo-cons are Jewish and not all Jewish people are neo-cons. Similarly, not all Zionists are Jewish and not all Jewish persons are Zionists. It looks like there is a deep dislike or fear that is easily triggered by critical political essays, like Saker's, about politics, foreign policy, banking and war. Commenters with these reactions to Saker's essay should maybe introspect a little on what is running in the minds and emotions.

    We prefer to rely on what’s running through objective reality… The good old facts. In other words, the antisemitism you see is a natural reaction to the Jews anti-whiteness and anti -Christianism, anti-heterosexuality, and a long list of antis.

    If in doubt, go have a look at the Jewish press outlets, where they typically don’t hide at all their scorn and even hatred for us ‘goyims’… Even Menahem Begin, when he was Prime Minister, said that ‘the goyim will live to serve us’… His statement is a matter of public record. That leaves no room for any doubts as to the Jewish true desire… The huge backlash they will eventually face will be a boomerang initiated by them, coming back at them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. @geokat62
    I prefer putting anti-Lobby sentiments into this syllogism:

    Some Jewish people participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby.
    Most activities of The Lobby are harmful to the American people.
    Ergo, all Jewish people who participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby are promoting activities that are harmful to the American people.

    That is the logic of anti-Lobby sentiments in these commentaries.

    “Ergo, all Jewish people who participate in or defend the activities of The Lobby are promoting activities that are harmful to the American people.

    That is the logic of anti-Lobby sentiments in these commentaries.”

    And this logic is correct… Because ‘The Lobby’, as in a pro-Jewish lobby (ie AIPAC) selfishly works for the interests of Israel, not of the USA… Therefore, harmful to the American people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. @Wally
    What has happened is that Jews were thrown out for their despicable behavior.

    They now, however, have "that shitty little country" to run & hide in.

    Forget about the impossible '6M' lie, that is just part of their hateful scam ... as the world is now finding out.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Hatemongering Jews have been marketing the '6,000,000' lie since at least 1869.

    http://balder.org/judea/billeder-judea/Scan-New-York-Times-Six-Million-Since-1869-Composite.jpg
    see:
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

    "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

    “What has happened is that Jews were thrown out for their despicable behavior.

    They now, however, have “that shitty little country” to run & hide in.”

    Correct. Matter of fact, as the historic public records of certain European countries show, the Jews as a community have been expelled from other countries more than once…

    1) So, this is NOT the first time they try to control another nation. Again, this is a matter of public record.

    2) The records in countries like Ukraine show the Jews were involved in ritual murder of kidnapped children, and also, in Germany, the Jews practically ran the prostitution business all on their own.

    3) In this day and time, many thousands of Russian and Ukrainian women have been lured to go to Israel with false promises of good jobs, and then forced into prostitution, as practically sexual slaves.

    Again, these are matters of public record. In fact, western universities and even UN have full studies/reports in regards to point # 3. By the way, many of the girls claim that many of their ‘clients’ were Jewish rabbis (and that those are particularly perverted is a common remark)! You’d be surprised that these statements appear in official papers.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. @Tulips
    The comments of DFH and nsa prove my point. Try to put the anti-Semitism into a syllogism:

    Some Jewish people are neo-conservatives.
    Most neo-conservatives are Jewish.
    Ergo, all Jewish people are bad.

    That is the illogic of the anti-Semitism in these commentaries.

    Whatever the particulars of neoconservatism, it shares with almost all Jewish intellectual movements (and the political attitudes of enough individual Jews to permit generalizations) the objective of pursuing particularist, Jewish interests under the guise of universalism.

    True that most American Jews are not foaming-at-the-mouth Likudniks like the neocons. But it is doubtless true that (for the most part) they share many of the neocons’ key premises to some extent, on both foreign and domestic policy (such that even a conservative Jew tends to have more in common with a liberal Jew than a conservative White). Again, the question is, can we make valid generalizations without resorting to demonization? I believe so.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon
    "True that most American Jews are not foaming-at-the-mouth Likudniks like the neocons. But"

    They do come out in support of Israel and they come out against the enemies of Israel in right moment without fail .

    Iraq war, sanctions against Sudan over Darfur or , Gaza war and sanction against Iran have shown that the crowd could be depended upon to carry the water for the Neocons when they need
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. @CalDre

    historically we know what usually happens next.
     
    Historically they've never had it wrapped up as tightly as they do now. Pretty much they own everything - virtually all the politicians, virtually all the media (including Google, FB, YouTube, Twitter). all the smartphone operating systems, the intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense and many other regulatory agencies, the banks (including the Fed), ...

    Plus they will soon have drones and AI to control them. At that point they won't have to rely on "Goy" to do their killing and controlling, they'll have a loyal and unstoppable army. And the average Americans is happily increasing surveillance and robotic powers all the time.

    No, unless there is a rather sudden awakening in the net 10 years or so, which given the degree of mind control I find quite implausible, game over.

    True, sadly. Don’t forget recent forays into micro-chipping employees. There is a case for pessimism, but there is also the historical tendency for overplaying their hand. I suppose we shall see which effect wins out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. c matt says:
    @EugeneGur
    Trump sure is better than Hillary, but that’s not such a big achievement: I can think of very few people who are worse than her. He did not fulfill his key promise, though: stop foreign policy BS and deal with the US problems at home (infrastructure, manufacturing, education, health care, etc.)

    He did not fulfill his key promise(s) yet, but that is not from a lack of trying. Kind of difficult to get much done when you are Trump contra mundum.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Tulips
    I am surprised by the anti-Semitism in the comments. Reading these comments causes me to think that Canada, Mexico, Cuba, and other near-by nations should have contingency plans for Jewish refugees fleeing the USA. Not all neo-cons are Jewish and not all Jewish people are neo-cons. Similarly, not all Zionists are Jewish and not all Jewish persons are Zionists. It looks like there is a deep dislike or fear that is easily triggered by critical political essays, like Saker's, about politics, foreign policy, banking and war. Commenters with these reactions to Saker's essay should maybe introspect a little on what is running in the minds and emotions.

    The hangman , soldiers, or the police guarding the cell are not the real architect of the legal system or of the military decision making process .

    Different gentiles figures in this NeoCon game of regime change, new wars, perpetual war, delivery of the financial instruments to enrich Israel and rob its enemies are paid and they happen to be employee of the pyramidal fraudulent system run by the Zionist. Their power come in pushing for agenda at seriously important level of governance but often against their wishes and against the interest of the ethnic groups from which they are drawn. So they look famous powerful and independent .
    They are no more independent than the hangman is .

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. GF says:

    I would like someone to publish a list (with a short paragraph stating affiliations, book/article links, current job etc.) of ALL the neocons in the US and any with influence upon US citizens, politicians institutions etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  103. anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Beefcake the Mighty
    Whatever the particulars of neoconservatism, it shares with almost all Jewish intellectual movements (and the political attitudes of enough individual Jews to permit generalizations) the objective of pursuing particularist, Jewish interests under the guise of universalism.

    True that most American Jews are not foaming-at-the-mouth Likudniks like the neocons. But it is doubtless true that (for the most part) they share many of the neocons' key premises to some extent, on both foreign and domestic policy (such that even a conservative Jew tends to have more in common with a liberal Jew than a conservative White). Again, the question is, can we make valid generalizations without resorting to demonization? I believe so.

    “True that most American Jews are not foaming-at-the-mouth Likudniks like the neocons. But”

    They do come out in support of Israel and they come out against the enemies of Israel in right moment without fail .

    Iraq war, sanctions against Sudan over Darfur or , Gaza war and sanction against Iran have shown that the crowd could be depended upon to carry the water for the Neocons when they need

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @Sherman
    Hey Andrey

    When war breaks out hopefully Smyrna Beach will stay safe.


    Sherm

    Private threats not allowed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. @CalDre

    historically we know what usually happens next.
     
    Historically they've never had it wrapped up as tightly as they do now. Pretty much they own everything - virtually all the politicians, virtually all the media (including Google, FB, YouTube, Twitter). all the smartphone operating systems, the intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense and many other regulatory agencies, the banks (including the Fed), ...

    Plus they will soon have drones and AI to control them. At that point they won't have to rely on "Goy" to do their killing and controlling, they'll have a loyal and unstoppable army. And the average Americans is happily increasing surveillance and robotic powers all the time.

    No, unless there is a rather sudden awakening in the net 10 years or so, which given the degree of mind control I find quite implausible, game over.

    Don’t forget though, once the point of “game over” is reached there will be a clear out and a culling of all entities that have been useful in attaining success but who will now simply represent a threat if allowed to remain. That does usually happen ‘next’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. The US government may become delegitimized? I think that ship sailed awhile back. This whole trajectory goes back to PNAC in the 90′s. Every war is a bigger disaster than the one before, yet they just keep coming. Our so-called government has completely abandoned all domestic concerns, since they are all millionaires. The neocons and neoliberals run the place, together, and put on these shows like the healthcare debate, reproductive rights, “budget stand-offs”, gun control, and so on, to keep us bickering. They make sure we have plenty of sports, oxy, and reality tv for hypnosis. Clinton, Obama, Cheney, Bush, AIPAC, PHARMA, NYT, TNR, CNBC,… run the show – one big malignant family.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  107. vetran says:

    And if Obama was probably the most incompetent President in US history …

    From a Zionist point of view and other hawks, he was certainly …
    He didn’t submit to Netanyahu’s bidding, refused to enforce his own “red line” on Syria and inked a nuclear deal with Iran.
    Not bad for the most incompetent president in US history.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    Good that you brought up Obama's standing up to Israel. People do not want to remember it. Keeping this in mind we can understand better where did Trump come from and which faction in American establishment decided to support him, though not overtly, from the very beginning. Obama was selected as the antidote for eight years of neocon policies under Bush that destroyed reputation and image of America in the world and hindered the globalization. And Obama succeeded repairing this damage to large extent but at expense of some Israel's interest. Under Obama the globalization process accelerated. Trump was selected and his nationalistic agenda was formulated to win against the liberal Trotskyist globalists whose policies are broader and global that not necessarily keep Israel in the driver seat. The only way to win was to create an impression of a candidate who will have a populist and nationalistic message. This message had three pillars: (1) less immigration (nativism), (2) national economy (better jobs) and (3) less foreign interventions (isolationism). The third pillar was a blatant lie from the very beginning. Trump's constant talk about Iran was the giveaway. The second pillar was just a pipe dream as it is impossible to implement it at this stage of global interconnections and the first pillar was the only one that could be partially fulfilled also because Israel did not care about it at all. The first pillar will be used to keep Trump's base happy. The reneging of the third pillar will not hurt Trump because Americans love their wars and nothing makes them happier than lots of flag waving. The issues about the second pillar are so complex that nobody will have patience to think about it and it will be forgotten besides the big banking interests are all against it.

    Now, what about the faction that supported Trump. Clearly there is a significant military contingent behind Trump. Who are they? Are they all Zionist who are doing it for Israel or are they some secret patriots who thought that Trump can be actually used for the benefit of America the Country not America the Empire? Or is there a quid pro quo between them and the Zionists? Or did they volunteer to save America from Trump?

    The legitimate alt-right represented by Breitbart is nothing else than a Zionist operation that is dangling some nationalist and populist memes for the naive alt-righters. Their main cause will be to purge from administration those who may want to continue Obama's policy of distance form Israel. Currently their target is McMaster.

    Finally there are the Orthodox and Chabad-Lubavitch in particular who are extreme Zionist with great influence over Netanyahu and with connections to all slum lords of NY and NJ like Trump and Kushner families. They also managed to monopolize Jewish influence in Russia. Putin deals only with them. They do not mind nationalism at least on tactical level of their host countries and they always were against the liberal wing of the world revolution. In 1812 they stood on the side of Tsar against Napoleon despite the fact that Napoleon's objective was to bring them liberty and emancipation. Trump-Netanyahu-Putin axis was created along the lines of Chabad-Lubavich connections. Obviously those three and the Orthodox are all crooks and thieves and they are all watching each other hands constantly. There is no honor among thieves. Some will be peeling off from the alliance. Putin probably will be first because he will get nothing from Trump who learned he has no permission for any initiatives on Russia front and Putin will be pressured in Syria where he was allowed to have some free reign in last two years because such was the Netanyahu's whim probably because he wanted to rub the nose of Obama. Netanyahu's tone when talking with Putin has already changed.

    Poor American people Where ever they turn they are being played by Jewish interest. Basically there are only two political forces left: the Trotskyist/Globalist Jews who have an appetite for the whole word empire and global cultural revolution or the Zionist Jews who are also for the empire but who want to make sure that Israel is the central part of the empire at all stages while the empire is being built. They do not want to be betrayed by Trotskyist who may overlook the promise given to the Zionists that the the capital of the empire would be in Jerusalem.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  108. utu says:
    @vetran

    And if Obama was probably the most incompetent President in US history ...
     
    From a Zionist point of view and other hawks, he was certainly ...
    He didn't submit to Netanyahu's bidding, refused to enforce his own "red line" on Syria and inked a nuclear deal with Iran.
    Not bad for the most incompetent president in US history.

    Good that you brought up Obama’s standing up to Israel. People do not want to remember it. Keeping this in mind we can understand better where did Trump come from and which faction in American establishment decided to support him, though not overtly, from the very beginning. Obama was selected as the antidote for eight years of neocon policies under Bush that destroyed reputation and image of America in the world and hindered the globalization. And Obama succeeded repairing this damage to large extent but at expense of some Israel’s interest. Under Obama the globalization process accelerated. Trump was selected and his nationalistic agenda was formulated to win against the liberal Trotskyist globalists whose policies are broader and global that not necessarily keep Israel in the driver seat. The only way to win was to create an impression of a candidate who will have a populist and nationalistic message. This message had three pillars: (1) less immigration (nativism), (2) national economy (better jobs) and (3) less foreign interventions (isolationism). The third pillar was a blatant lie from the very beginning. Trump’s constant talk about Iran was the giveaway. The second pillar was just a pipe dream as it is impossible to implement it at this stage of global interconnections and the first pillar was the only one that could be partially fulfilled also because Israel did not care about it at all. The first pillar will be used to keep Trump’s base happy. The reneging of the third pillar will not hurt Trump because Americans love their wars and nothing makes them happier than lots of flag waving. The issues about the second pillar are so complex that nobody will have patience to think about it and it will be forgotten besides the big banking interests are all against it.

    Now, what about the faction that supported Trump. Clearly there is a significant military contingent behind Trump. Who are they? Are they all Zionist who are doing it for Israel or are they some secret patriots who thought that Trump can be actually used for the benefit of America the Country not America the Empire? Or is there a quid pro quo between them and the Zionists? Or did they volunteer to save America from Trump?

    The legitimate alt-right represented by Breitbart is nothing else than a Zionist operation that is dangling some nationalist and populist memes for the naive alt-righters. Their main cause will be to purge from administration those who may want to continue Obama’s policy of distance form Israel. Currently their target is McMaster.

    Finally there are the Orthodox and Chabad-Lubavitch in particular who are extreme Zionist with great influence over Netanyahu and with connections to all slum lords of NY and NJ like Trump and Kushner families. They also managed to monopolize Jewish influence in Russia. Putin deals only with them. They do not mind nationalism at least on tactical level of their host countries and they always were against the liberal wing of the world revolution. In 1812 they stood on the side of Tsar against Napoleon despite the fact that Napoleon’s objective was to bring them liberty and emancipation. Trump-Netanyahu-Putin axis was created along the lines of Chabad-Lubavich connections. Obviously those three and the Orthodox are all crooks and thieves and they are all watching each other hands constantly. There is no honor among thieves. Some will be peeling off from the alliance. Putin probably will be first because he will get nothing from Trump who learned he has no permission for any initiatives on Russia front and Putin will be pressured in Syria where he was allowed to have some free reign in last two years because such was the Netanyahu’s whim probably because he wanted to rub the nose of Obama. Netanyahu’s tone when talking with Putin has already changed.

    Poor American people Where ever they turn they are being played by Jewish interest. Basically there are only two political forces left: the Trotskyist/Globalist Jews who have an appetite for the whole word empire and global cultural revolution or the Zionist Jews who are also for the empire but who want to make sure that Israel is the central part of the empire at all stages while the empire is being built. They do not want to be betrayed by Trotskyist who may overlook the promise given to the Zionists that the the capital of the empire would be in Jerusalem.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. prusmc says:
    @Lawrence Fitton
    trump used the neocon expression 'drain the swamp' on the campaign trail. he was talking about washington while the neocons were referring to the near & mid-east. both he & they were full of hubris.
    the swamp dwellers in d.c. can't be extricated short of revolution. the mid-east is in chaos thanks to the neocons and the swamp is getting, well, swampier. trump has no plans to get us out of the mess the neocons got us in even if he could. this adds to trump's incompetence, which when applied to his mental cardboard jungle, bodes ill for america under his term - if he serves it out.
    i tend to agree with everything the saker wrote. we are in trouble folks. obama & bush left trump with a mess. trump has not the wherewithal to get us out. but, realistically, who can?
    there is a middle eastern expression that goes something like this: one fool can create problem that 100 wise men can't solve.
    trump is a clown show. he's gotta go. the problem is, then we get pence.

    Lawerence Fitton:

    Who can get us out, obviously, not Trump? How about Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Senator Kaine or Devel Patrick? Maybe an experienced foreign policy hand like Joe Biden? Would Bernie accept a draft?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Gen. Flynn was not good man. Sorry. He had been bought off by Turkey.

    Trump does not have the background to kick out the Neo-cons.

    Rand Paul probably would have but not Trump.

    His muscular policies are mostly (not fully) at odds with his desire to not do nation-building.

    What kind of people are we, mostly Christian Americans, that let Jews run roughshod over us?

    “People get the kind of government they deserve.” We have failed the test – we are cowards who prize money above country.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  111. Verne says:

    the US is the only country in the world that can print as much money as it wants

    Actually, not quite. The U.S. can print a lot of money, but not as much as it might want or need. The evidence is that so many Americans are just a medical crisis from economic ruin.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  112. Verne says:

    Plus they will soon have drones and AI to control them. At that point they won’t have to rely on “Goy” to do their killing and controlling, they’ll have a loyal and unstoppable army.

    Not if the drones come from someplace the Neocons don’t completely control, such as China. Then the robot army will be unleashed against the chosen people — think untraceable and unstoppable assassins.

    It’s quite a tragedy for the Jewish people that the Neocons should have gotten so powerful. Their program (global domination) was always likely to fail, and their chosen means (deception) will cause an immense backlash against not only themselves but also the Jews in general, this time all over the world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  113. Frank1961 says:

    Is there an **editor** at UNZ? The gist of this article is very good but, the spelling, grammar, and sentence structure have several obvious errors. A high-school newspaper would be ashamed of the writing quality.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All The Saker Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?