The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 The Saker ArchiveBlogview
Manipulated Minorities Represent a Major Danger for Democratic States
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_701691037
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

First, a quick disclaimer or, should I say, a clarification: When I speak of minorities, as I will below, I do that as a person who belongs to a long list of minorities. I was born in a family of Russian refugees. Right there, that makes me part of a (rather small) minority. Furthermore, I lived most of my life in the French speaking part of Switzerland, that again makes me part of a minority. Then, I am an Orthodox Christian. That is also a minority inside of the so-called “Christian” world (in reality a post-Christian world, of course). Moreover, I am a traditionalist Orthodox Christian, a small minority inside the much bigger “world Orthodoxy”. And inside that, I am a Russian inside a majority Greek Church. I also lived for 5 years in Washington, DC, which was something like 70% Black and, at the time, openly and often rudely hostile to Whites (I never thought of myself as a color before, but I sure felt like one during those 5 years). And now I am a “legal alien” living in the US. Anyway, while I am “White” (what a nonsensical category!) I suppose, that hardly makes me a typical WASP. So I am quite used to “being a minority” (and I quite like that, would I add). Just thought this might a useful clarification before I engage in the following thoughtcrimes.

* * *

Question: why does the US foreign policies always support various minorities? Is it out of kindness? Or a sense of fairness? Could it be out of a deep sense of guilt of having committed the only “pan-genocide” in human history (the genocide of all the ethnic groups of an entire continent)? Or maybe a deep sense of guilt over slavery? Are the beautiful words of the Declaration of Independence “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal” really inspiring US foreign policies?

Hardly.

I submit that the real truth is totally different. My thesis is very simple: the reason why the US always support foreign minorities to subvert states and use domestic minorities to suppress the majority US population is because minorities are very easy to manipulate and because minorities present no threat to the real rulers of the AngloZionist Empire. That’s all there is to it.

I think that minorities often, but not always, act and perceive things in a way very different from the way majority groups do. Here is what I have observed:

Let’s first look at minorities inside the US:

  1. They are typically far more aware of their minority identity/status than the majority. That is to say that if the majority is of skin color A and the minority of skin color B, the minority will be much more acutely aware of its skin color.
  2. They are typically much more driven and active then the majority. This is probably due to their more acute perception of being a minority.
  3. They are only concerned with single-issue politics, that single-issue being, of course, their minority status.
  4. Since minorities are often unhappy with their minority-status, they are also often resentful of the majority.
  5. Since minorities are mostly preoccupied by their minority-status linked issue, they rarely pay attention to the ‘bigger picture’ and that, in turn, means that the political agenda of the minorities typically does not threaten the powers that be.
  6. Minorities often have a deep-seated inferiority complextowards the putatively more successful majority.
  7. Minorities often seek to identify other minorities with which they can ally themselves against the majority.

To this list of characteristics, I would add one which is unique to foreign minorities, minorities outside the US: since they have no/very little prospects of prevailing against the majority, these minorities are very willing to ally themselves with the AngloZionist Empire and that, in turn, often makes them depended on the AngloZionist Empire, often even for their physical survival.

The above are, of course, very general characterizations. Not all minorities display all of these characteristics and many display only a few of them. But regardless of the degree to which any single minority fits this list of characteristics, what is obvious is that minorities are extremely easy to manipulate and that they present no credible (full-spectrum) threat to the Empire.

The US Democratic Party is the perfect example of a party which heavily relies on minority manipulation to maximize its power. While the Republican Party is by and large the party of the White, Anglo, Christian and wealthy voters, the Democrats try to cater to Blacks, women, Leftists, homosexuals, immigrants, retirees, and all others who feel like they are not getting their fair share of the proverbial pie. Needless to say, in reality there is only one party in the US, you can call the the Uniparty, the Republicracts or the Demolicans, but in reality both wings of the Big Money party stand for exactly the same things. What I am looking at here is not at some supposed real differences, but the way the parties present themselves. It is the combined action of these two fundamentally identical parties which guarantees the status quo in US politics which I like to sum up as “more of the same, only worse”.

I would like to mention an important corollary of my thesis that minorities are typically more driven than the majority. If we accept that minorities are typically much more driven than most of the population, then we also immediately can see why their influence over society is often out of proportion with the numerical demographical “weight”. This has nothing to do with these minorities being more intelligent or more creative and everything to do with them willing to being spend much more time and efforts towards their objectives than most people.

So we have easy to manipulate, small groups, whose agenda does not threaten the 1% (really, much less!), who like to gang up with other similar minorities against the majority. Getting scared yet? It gets worse.

Western ‘democracies’ are mostly democracies only in name. In most of them instead of “one man one vote” we see “one dollar one vote” meaning that big money decides, not “the people”. Those in real power have immense financial resources which they cynically use to boost the already totally disproportional power of the various minorities. Now this is really scary:

Easy to manipulate, small groups, highly driven, whose agenda does not threaten the ruling plutocracy, who like to gang up with other similar minorities against the majority and whose influence is vastly increased by immense sums of money invested in them by the plutocracy. How is that for a threat to real people power, to the ideals of democracy?!

The frightening truth is that the combination of minorities and big money can easily hijack a supposedly ‘democratic’ country and subjugate the majority of its population to the “rule of the few over the many”.

ORDER IT NOW

Once we look this reality in the face we should also become aware of a very rarely mentioned fact: while we are taught that democracies should uphold the right of the minorities, the opposite is true: real democracies should strive to protect majorities against the abuse of power from minorities!

I know, I have just committed a long list of grievous thoughtcrimes!

At those who might be angry at me, I will reply with a single sentence: please name me a western country where the views of the majority of its people are truly represented in the policies of their governments? And if you fail to come up with a good example, then I need to ask you if the majority is clearly not in power, then who is?

I submit that the plutocratic elites which govern the West have played a very simple trick on us all: they managed to focus our attention on the many cases in history when minorities were oppressed by majorities but completely obfuscated the numerous cases whereminorities oppressed majorities.

Speaking of oppression: minorities are far more likely to benefit and, therefore, use violence than the majority simply because their worldview often centers on deeply-held resentments. To put it differently, minorities are much more prone to settling scores for past wrongs (whether real or imagined) than a majority which typically does not even think in minority versus majority categories.

Not that majorities are always benign or kind towards minorities, not at all, humans being pretty much the same everywhere, but by the fact that they are less driven, less resentful and, I would argue, even less aware of their “majority status” they are less likely to act on such categories.

Foreign minorities play a crucial role in US foreign policy. Since time immemorial rulers have been acutely aware of the “divide et impera” rule, there is nothing new here. But the US has become the uncontested leader in the art of using national minorities to create strife and overthrow a disobedient regime. The AngloZionist war against the Serbian nation is the perfect example of how this is done: the US supported any minority against the Serbs, even groups that the US classified as terrorists, as long as this was against the Serbs. And, besides being Orthodox Slavs and traditional allies of Russia, what was the real ‘crime’ of the Serbs? Being the majority of course! The Serbs had no need of the AngloZionists to prevail against the various ethnic (Croats) and religious (Muslims) minorities they lived with. That made the Serbs useless to the Empire. But now that the US has created a fiction of an independent Kosovo, the Kosovo Albanians put up a statue of Bill Clinton in Prishtina and, more relevantly, allowed the Empire to build the Camp Bondsteel mega-base in the middle of their nasty little statelet, right on the land of the Serbian population that was ethnically cleansed during the Kosovo war. US democracy building at its best indeed…

The same goes for Russia (and, the Soviet Union) where the US went as far as to support the right of self-determination for non-existing “captive nations” such as “Idel-Ural” and “Cossakia. I would even argue that the Empire has created several nation ex nihilo (What in the world is a “Belarussian”?!).

I am fully aware that in the typical TV watching westerner any discussion of minorities focusing on their negative potential immediately elicits visions of hammers and sickles, smoking crematoria chimneys, chain gangs, lynchmobs, etc. This is basic and primitive conditioning. Carefully engineered events such as the recent riots in Charlottesville only further reinforce this type of mass conditioning. This is very deliberate and, I would add, very effective. As a result, any criticism, even just perceived criticism, of a minority immediately triggers outraged protests and frantic virtue-signaling (not me! look how good I am!!).

Of course, carefully using minorities is just one of the tactics used by the ruling plutocracy. Another of their favorite tricks is to created conflicts out of nothing or ridiculously bloat the visibility of an altogether minor topic (example: homo-marriages). The main rule remains the same though: create tensions, conflicts, chaos, subvert the current order (whatever that specific order might be), basically have the serfs fight each other while we rule.

In Switzerland an often used expression to describe “the people” is “the sovereign”. This is a very accurate description of the status of the people in a real democracy: they are “sovereign” in the sense that nobody rules over them. In that sense, the issue in the United States is one of sovereignty: as of today, the real sovereign of the US are the corporations, the deep state, the Neocons, the plutocracy, the financiers, the Israel Lobby – you name it, anybody BUT the people.

In that system of oppression, minorities play a crucial role, even if they are totally unaware of this and even if, at the end of the day, they don’t benefit from it. Their perception or their lack of achievements in no way diminishes the role that they play in the western pseudo-democracies.

How do with deal with this threat?

I think that the solution lies with the minorities themselves: they need to be educated about the techniques which are used to manipulate them, and they need to be convinced that their minority status does not, in reality, oppose them to the majority and that both the majority and the minorities have a common interest in together standing against those who seek to rule over them all. Striving to remain faithful to my “Putin fanboy” reputation, I will say that I believe that Russia under Putin is doing exactly the right thing by giving the numerous Russian minorities a stake in the future of the Russian state and by convincing the minorities that their interests and the interest of the majority of the people are fundamentally the same: being a minority does not have to mean being in opposition to the majority. It is a truism that minorities need to be fully integrated into the fabric of society and yet this is rarely practiced in the real world. This is certainly not what I observe today in Europe or the US.

The French author Alain Soral has proposed what I think is a brilliant motto to deal with this situation in France. He has called his movement “Equality and Reconciliation” and as of right now, this is the only political movement in France which does not want to favor one group at the expense of the other. Everybody else either wants to oppress the “français de souche” (the native, mostly White and Roman-Catholic majority) on behalf of the “français de branche” (immigrants, naturalized citizens, minorities), or oppress the “français de branche” on behalf of the “français de souche”. Needless to say, the only ones who benefit from this clash is the ruling Zionist elite (best represented by the infamous CRIF, which makes the US AIPAC look comparatively honorable and weak). As for Soral, he is vilified by the official French media with no less hate than Trump is vilified in the US by the US Ziomedia.

Still, equality and reconciliation are the two things which the majorities absolutely must offer the minorities if they want to prevent the latter to fall prey to the manipulation techniques used by those forces who want to turn everybody into obedient and clueless serfs. Those majorities who delude themselves and believe that they can simply solve the “minority problem” by expelling or otherwise making these minorities disappear are only kidding themselves. To ‘simply’ solve the “minority problem’ by cracking down on these minorities inevitably pushes them directly into the warm embrace of the big manipulators, it turns these minorities into a powerful anti-majority weapon. This is the big danger of movements like Alt-Right or the National Front in France – their actions only serve to “weaponize” minorities. Mind you, this does not mean that the concerns and grievances voiced by these movements are without merits, not at all, it’s their (pseudo) “solutions” which are the real danger.

There is only effective way defuse the explosive potential of minorities:

  1. Educate minorities and explain to them that they are being manipulated
  2. Educate those joining anti-minority movements that they are also being manipulated
  3. Offer the minorities a future based on equality and reconciliation
  4. Put the spotlight on those who fan the flames of conflict and try to turn minorities and majorities against each other

At the end of the day, this is an identity issue. While we all typically have several co-existing identities inside us (say, German, retired, college-educated, female, Buddhist, vegetarian, exile, resident of Brazil, etc. as opposed to just “White”) in manipulated minorities one such identity (skin color, religion, etc.) becomes over-bloated and trumps all the others. By restoring a healthy identity balance inside its various minorities and by fostering those identities which most residents have in common a society can counteract the toxic effects of those who strive on conflict, chaos and mayhem. Truly, the latter are our only real enemy and they ought to be treated as such.

 
    []
  1. “While we all typically [have] several co-existing identities inside us (say, German, retired, college-educated, female, Buddhist, vegetarian, exile, resident of Brazil, etc. as opposed to just “White”), in manipulated minorities one such identity (skin color, religion, etc.) becomes over-bloated and trumps all the others.” — The Saker

    That’s a great critique of “identity politics” … and one reason why identity politics is self-limiting, maybe even self-destructive (as well as destructive of democracy).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /tsaker/manipulated-minorities-represent-a-major-danger-for-democratic-states/#comment-1983844
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. To distill it to an aphorism, “A million guys with one buck, are no match for one guy with a million bucks.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Here is the mantra of political fund raisers. " it's easier to get one donor to give $1,000 than to get 20 donors to give $50 apiece."
    , @WorkingClass
    Unless a million guys are organized.
  3. Another point:

    The poorer people are, the more vulnerable they are to identity politics.

    It’s like an Indian movie I once saw that was constructed as a family history. When the family experienced many setbacks, one after another, until they were all disheartened, the patriarch of the family spoke up, saying, “Remember, we are Bengali!” That was the turning point in the film: after that things began to improve for the family so that the film could have a happy Bolliwood ending.

    That was like saying, “Remember, we have a proud history!”

    There was also a Yiddish joke that someone told me, like this: There was a young Jewish man in some place like Minsk, somewhere in Eastern Europe, and he saw an advertisement by none other than a great member of the Rothschild banking family. The ad said “Wanted: young Jewish man for difficult and physically challenging assignment.” So the hero (or anti-hero?) of this story set out immediately for Paris. Unfortunately, our hero experienced many tragedies, even losing an arm and a leg. But he was determined and he persevered, with the help of a crutch. Finally, he had to camp out in front of the gate of the Rothschild mansion outside of Paris. Eventually, the great Rothschild had his carriage stop and spoke to the man, saying, “You know, I’ve seen you standing here day after day … what is it that you want?” Our hero brought out the advertisement that he had carried with him through all his misadventures. The great Rothschild read the advertisement and exclaimed, “What’s the matter with you? Did you not read that the job was physically challenging?” To which our hero responded, “Yes, but, Mr. Rothschild, the ad says “young Jewish man.”

    Being myself a gentile, I did not at first get the joke, but eventually I got a chuckle out of it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Get the Apu trilogy by the late Satyajit Ray if you're into varied cinema... You won't be disappointed!
  4. What do all races, genders, nationalities and creeds have in common? An overwhelming majority of them are working class. That’s why I am white and Nationalist but not a White Nationalist. The working class wants work and wages. The ruling class gives us war and welfare. Solidarity is the only effective defense against concentrated wealth. Absent solidarity the working class is a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. Witness the American prole. Simultaneously under the lash and at each others throats.

    Read More
    • Agree: Grandpa Charlie
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    The working class wants work and wages.
     
    Which is a key reason that things are not likely to improve for at least a few more millennia. Accepting wages is a form of slavery, and most folks simply cannot see beyond that trap. The system has evolved so that people readily accept the idea of wages as a necessity (along with the extortion and theft known as taxes). There's a huge difference between making (earning) a living and holding a job for wages, but I doubt I'll ever be able to convince anyone of that.

    Tolstoy wrote about the concept of wage slavery over a century ago and it makes good reading to this day.


    “But in reality the abolition of serfdom and of [chattel] slavery was only the abolition of an obsolete form of slavery that had become unnecessary, and the substitution for it of a firmer form of slavery and one that holds a greater number of people in bondage.”

    - Leo Tolstoy

    A few typos, but otherwise a fine summary: Tolstoy, Slavery of Our Times, Chap 8, 11 July, 1900 http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/WorldeBookLibrary.com/slaverytol.htm#1_0_7


    The ruling class gives us war and welfare. Solidarity is the only effective defense against concentrated wealth. Absent solidarity the working class is a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. Witness the American prole. Simultaneously under the lash and at each others throats.
     
    All true, except the part about solidarity, which would definitely be a huge step in the right direction for us proles and peasants, but is probably as unobtainable as true education of the masses.

    As I see it, the best an individual can do is to toss a monkey wrench into the system whenever we can get away with it, but that requires an understanding of who are enemies are and that seems nearly impossible to achieve. Thus it's effective only in theory. In practice, it's probably as ephemeral as a gas emission in a tornado.

    , @War for Blair Mountain
    The Chinese in California are Chinese Race Nationalist...The Hindus in California are Hindu Race Nationalists...You are a Civic Nationalist Cuck.
    , @boogerbently
    Why don't they understand that if we give them what they think they want, we'll turn into the country they escaped from ?
  5. Could it be out of a deep sense of guilt of having committed the only “pan-genocide” in human history

    I guess Saker’s never heard of the Ukranian Holodomor, perpetrated by his beloved Russia. And what were Spain, Portugal and Britain up to in the New World? This guy’s a left-wing Euro clown.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Logan
    If we had ever made a serious consistent effort to kill all the Indians, they'd be gone. But there seem to be quite a few of them still around. About 5M, in fact, considerably more than lived in the boundaries of the USA in 1491.

    Argentina had similar Indian problems during the same time period (late 19th century) we were fighting our final Indian wars. But they had a different approach: extermination.

    Quite successful at it, too. Very few Indians left in Argentina. And they didn't import any other minorities, which means Argentina is now upwards of 90% "white." Much more so than USA, in fact.
    , @Sarah Toga

    Could it be out of a deep sense of guilt of having committed the only “pan-genocide” in human history (the genocide of all the ethnic groups of an entire continent)?
     
    Another thought - while probably not intended to this end, the "Indian Reservations" effectively preserved a fair number of full-blood "Native Americans." Preserved them as tribes. Today, they are re-grouping. Not so many full-bloods these days. But enough who identify as whatever Tribe instead as White, regardless of the small quantum of tribal blood.

    Unfair, rough treatment? Yes. And the SCOTUS of the day declared some of those actions unconstitutional. But hardly a genocide.
    I do see Saker's intro point as a preface to his main points.
    , @Hcat
    Argentina and Chile disposed of the Patagonians about the same time we were putting down Crazy Horse and Geronimo. So we aren't at all the only ones.
  6. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    I also lived for 5 years in Washington, DC, which was something like 70% Black and, at the time, openly and often rudely hostile to Whites (I never thought of myself as a color before, but I sure felt like one during those 5 years). And now I am a “legal alien” living in the US. Anyway, while I am “White” (what a nonsensical category!)

    Nonsensical? Really? Both the DC blacks and their DC (((paymasters))) hate your “category” but you’re still confused and want to hold hands and educate them? Do you have children?

    The French author Alain Soral has proposed what I think is a brilliant motto to deal with this situation in France. He has called his movement “Equality and Reconciliation” and as of right now, this is the only political movement in France which does not want to favor one group at the expense of the other.

    Demographically speaking, the native French group (white category FYI) is already doomed to lose their homeland unless they reverse the invasion and punish the plotters. Reconciling with their invaders would be assisted suicide, surely. Almost as bad as the forced miscegenation idea proposed by Nicolas “Jew Midget” Sarkozy a few years back.

    You need to wake up and check for any vitamin/mineral deficiencies you might have, Saker. Our ancestors butchered countless invaders to give us the land we’re standing on – they didn’t reconcile it away.

    Read More
  7. Bartolo says:

    Excellent diagnosis, ridiculous therapy.

    One single question shows how profoundly silly The Saker’s his “solution” is:

    Why would it be easier to convince resentful, envious minorities to just get along with the majority than to convince the elites to act better, according to the noblesse oblige principle?

    Elites will always misuse their power. Minorities/majorities will always quarrel and resent each other.

    Give us (back) ethnically homogeneous states instead. No panacea, but the besf we can hope for.

    Read More
  8. Cyrano says:

    The ruling elites of US (both democrats and republicans) can be divided into 2 categories:
    1. The ones who think that they are better because of their race.
    2. The ones who think that they are better because they were able to overcome the feeling of being better because of their race. In other words – the morally superior ubermensch instead of racially superior ubermensch.

    In reality, category 2 doesn’t exist (at least not among the ruling elites) – they are all liars. They haven’t been able to overcome any feeling of superiority, they just added another one – the one of moral superiority. Actually, the ruling elites for the most part are still category 1, only pretending to be category 2. Not only do they feel they are superior to other races, they feel they are superior to their own race – the poorer members of it.

    The ruling elites are manipulating the population of US into declaring that they belong in either one of these 2 camps. Result: Charlottesville riots.

    Read More
  9. Issac says:

    This post would sound eminently reasonable if the white identitarians had any kind of state blessing, but they are a de facto criminal element being suppressed. Not for the sake of democracy, but for the sake of the elite who are Jewish, not Zionist, and not very Anglo.

    White nationalism would have zero credibility if actual white leadership were transparently in control over the state. The wellspring of their support comes from the fact that what whites do exist in the power structure are absolutely and transparently subservient to other interests.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Arithtoddle
    "White nationalism would have zero credibility if actual white leadership were transparently in control over the state."

    Nope, but thanks for playing. White nationalism would have zero credibility if the leadership actually promoted American--WASP--interests. There is no escaping the Posterity clause, period. There is no magic dirt, no civic nationalism, no immersion in American culture, that can replace descendants of the English colonists that understand the importance of the Rights of Englishmen. The US was never intended to be the world's largest rest stop for every poor downtrodden person on Earth. Minorities now all undocumented immigrants since 1965 (Hart-Cellar).

    Homogeneous nation's are born from Heterogeneous nation's. We are witnesses to the birth pains. The length of the labor depends on how long the majority will tolerate the minorities. Reconciliation isn't just impossible--its not even on the table, unless you reverse time. They. Have. To. Go. Back.
  10. Ricard says:

    While we all typically several co-existing identities inside us

    Spot the missing verb.

    Read More
  11. Alden says:
    @Fran Macadam
    To distill it to an aphorism, "A million guys with one buck, are no match for one guy with a million bucks."

    Here is the mantra of political fund raisers. ” it’s easier to get one donor to give $1,000 than to get 20 donors to give $50 apiece.”

    Read More
  12. jocose says:

    One of the problems is that the US was (and still is) a republic-with a small r. The republican form of government assumes that the voters are too stupid or ignorant to pass laws, so they have to hire professional political types to write their governing laws for them. The politicos are easy targets for the powers that be to manipulate, evidently.

    Read More
  13. ogunsiron says:

    Soral is well meaning but i don’t think his “réconciliation nationale” is possible. It’s just not realistic.

    The maghrebians/arabs who ally themselves with Soral are mostly preoccuppied with the “sionisme” question. They happen to agree with the traditional french right wing that the ((())) are a really big problem. A certain number of arabs/maghrebians are willing to rub shoulders with french extreme rightists to collaborate on fighting zion, but when Soral addresses legitimate grievances of the White French majority, I notice that the arabs/maghrebians are less interested.

    There are a few, very few maghrebians who truly care about the White French people and who can see things from their perspective. A guy like Aldo Sterone is a good example of an arab who basically takes the White European side by default.

    There are even fewer Black people who are able to get past their deep, deep resentment of Whites. Soral’s reconciliation is already a very hard undertaking when it comes to arabs. It’s pretty much a waste of time when it comes to Black Africans. Kemi Seba is a rare, very rare example of a black nationalist who has done a lot of work with White French nationalists. The rest of the black population in France can’t be convinced to let go of their resentment, imho.

    Read More
  14. Wally says: • Website

    Saker tellingly left out direct mention of the usual enemies of free speech.

    The facts are that Jews support Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY, while they demand massive 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe?

    He did say something which deserves praise:

    “I am fully aware that in the typical TV watching westerner any discussion of minorities focusing on their negative potential immediately elicits visions of hammers and sickles, smoking crematoria chimneys, chain gangs, lynchmobs, etc. This is basic and primitive conditioning. Carefully engineered events such as the recent riots in Charlottesville only further reinforce this type of mass conditioning.”

    Mass conditioning indeed.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

    “Some stories are true that never happened.”
    - Elie Wiesel

    Read More
    • Replies: @Lawrence Fitton
    okay wally, i'm only going to say this once, so please pay attention. the gas chambers were but one method by which jews were killed. starvation, disease, forced labor, firing squads, killed legions. what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better.
    one last thing: elie wiesel is not the wonderful man he is purported to be.
  15. Beckow says:

    The problem is – as always – with the numbers. The large influx of migrants is changing the demographics and that changes the goals and behaviour of each group. The minority groups can see the promised land in the future when they will take over. The majority knows that they cannot stop it by “equality and reconciliation” (whatever that would mean in practise, maybe endless workshops to whine about each other?).

    The numbers game has gone too far and there is no easy way to restore stability. E.g. the labor markets in the West cannot be fixed without drastic restrictions on supply of new labor from the Third World. The article has some valuable insights, but the lame ‘solution’ it suggests is useless.

    Another issue not addressed is that many minorities are a majority in their regions leading to a geographic instability by putting borders in question. That separation actually makes sense in many cases.

    What we have had for some time are the elites behaving badly, they have stopped being responsible and thoughtful. The best solution I can see would be for the elites to sober up and start taking their role seriously again. Short of that, we will have chaos, and not the fun type of chaos. Those are the wages of the baby boomer idiocy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    Short of that, we will have chaos, and not the fun type of chaos.
     
    Chaos is on the march.

    It appears the minority has magically organized itself and planned a 10-day march from Charlottesville to DC, there to demand the impeachment/removal of Donald Trump, and to carry on a non-violent occupation (irony alert).


    http://thehill.com/homenews/news/348136-ten-day-march-from-charlottesville-to-dc-to-start-monday
  16. Manipulated majorities are an even greater danger.
    At the last French elections the political elite did anything possible to prevent Front National getting legal political power.
    With fifteen % of the votes, of those who bothered to vote, some 44%, Macron got an absolute majority in French parliament, some 360 seats.
    FN six or so.
    Yet, alas, anyone knows he won the elections, but not the streets.
    As his popularity goes down, Sun King habits, the strikes announced for 11 and 12 September will show who really is in power in France.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Manipulated majorities are an even greater danger.
     
    An even bigger threat is the manipulating minorities aka certain (most?) elements of the money bag crowd.

    This problem has been recognized for millennia and was discussed in detail by many early Americans who nevertheless argued in favor of a constitution and a centralized bureaucracy that favored the rich.

    Virtue cannot dwell with wealth either in a city or in a house.

    -Diogenes of Sinope, quoted by Stobaeus, iv. 31c. 88

     


    But if you will take note of the mode of proceedings of men, you will see that all those who come to great riches and great power have obtained them either by fraud or by force; and afterwards, to hide the ugliness of acquisition, they make it decent by applying the false title of earnings to things they have usurped by deceit or by violence.

    - Niccolo Machiavelli , HISTORY OF FLORENCE AND OF THE AFFAIRS OF ITALY, Book 3 chap 3Para 8
    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2464/2464-h/2464-h.htm#link2H_4_0022

     


    “…wealth is no proof of moral character; nor poverty of the want of it. On the contrary, wealth is often the presumptive evidence of dishonesty; and poverty the negative evidence of innocence.”

    THOMAS PAINE, DISSERTATION ON FIRST-PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT, 1795
    http://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ecco/004809392.0001.000/1:2?rgn=div1;view=fulltext

     

  17. Some minorities are more equal than others. The Deep State, for example.

    Read More
  18. If you want to lesson the influence of minorities in western democracies, then its essential to provide a more a la carte form of democracy that is less open to elite manipulation. Options include getting rid of political parties and voting directly for heads of government departments, or allowing voters to vote on which party gets to run each of the key government departments.

    It’s impossible to have a functional political system when the political parties themselves are allowed to decide what issues voters get to vote on, and can racially divide the electorate by providing policy packages which play to voter weaknesses. This results in absurd results like blacks in the US voting for mass unskilled immigration via the Democrats, and poor American whites voting for increased defense spending and financial liberalisation via the Republicans.

    There is no way around this problem without radically changing the political system.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    then its essential to provide a more a la carte form of democracy that is less open to elite manipulation.
     
    you mean something like state's sovereignty, which is what Robert E Lee stood for?
  19. Jason Liu says:

    Easier said than done. Most minorities would support anti-majority politics even IF they knew they were being manipulated. You severely underestimate the human attraction to tribalism.

    A more plausible plan would be to turn minorities against so-called ‘AngloZionist’ values, which is already partially complete, since minorities are rarely Anglos and therefore don’t subscribe to their values as much. Have a look at any SJW gathering. Always disproportionately white, even in very diverse cities. It’s much easier to convince even longtime resident minorities like blacks that things like transgenderism is bullshit, than it is to convince emotionally committed whites.

    This would result in a country that allows multiple competing tribalisms, but none of which would be very useful as pawns by the elites. Not as good as homogeneity, but better than the current situation.

    “Everybody gang up against the WEIRDs” is a nice thought and I would love to see it, but it’s just not very likely.

    Read More
  20. peterAUS says:

    There is only effective way defuse the explosive potential of minorities:

    Educate minorities and explain to them that they are being manipulated
    Educate those joining anti-minority movements that they are also being manipulated
    Offer the minorities a future based on equality and reconciliation
    Put the spotlight on those who fan the flames of conflict and try to turn minorities and majorities against each other

    Surprisingly weak and naive.

    A simple question:
    What’s wrong with Serb approach in Kosovo before Western intervention?
    Spare me “virtue signalling”….. if you can.

    I think it would’ve worked if West hadn’t stepped up with overwhelming FORCE.
    It worked in “Operation Storm”. Serbs as victims but that’s precisely the point.
    Perfect example how it CAN work.

    So…….following the same logic……..if…IF….West used the same approach……why it wouldn’t work?
    Say….French government does exactly the same as Croats did with Serbs in Croatia…or Serbs with Albanians/whatever in Kosovo.

    Just curious.

    Anyone?

    Read More
  21. Excellent piece.

    There is only effective way defuse the explosive potential of minorities:

    Educate minorities and explain to them that they are being manipulated
    Educate those joining anti-minority movements that they are also being manipulated

    While those ideas have merit, I predict they’ll be impossible to implement. Education is an active process and one cannot “be” educated in the passive sense. People, like other creatures, can be schooled and trained, but that’s not the same as acquiring an education.

    There are several reasons why the majority will never acquire any meaningful education. Most people simply do not possess the requisite curiosity to begin any sort of educational process and would rather make decisions based on immediate emotions. A true education requires active questioning of the standing myths and myths are evidently too comfortable for most to discard or even doubt. Most folks appear too lazy and or too timid to face the hard truths and would rather follow the dictates of some slick Peruna peddler.

    A shocking percentage of people apparently love the feeling of “superiority” of “knowing” something even if their belief is utter, easily discardable, hogwash and actively reject any challenges to it. For example, the mindless charge of “conspiracy theorist” is used to dismiss, without thinking, anything but the spoon fed drivel they see on teevee.

    I could go on, but this is already too long and is mostly preaching to the choir.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Well stated.

    And of course, what 'education' would these minorities be given?

    Take a look at what is given them now in our systems.
    Absolute lies about, and hatred of, white gentiles.

    Then there is the simple fact of minorities low IQs.
    What, we think we're going to train dumb Africans to be engineers?

    By and large these people are unemployable in a modern society.

    The entire matter of somehow 'educating' these people in the true sense of the word is laughable.
    Just look at the countries they come from.

    , @prusmc
    Jacquez:

    Educate the minorities! I have bwen hearing that for over 50 years. I believe that was a substantial rationale for Federal Aid to education. How has it worked? What does the US Census data show for the indicator median education level persons over 25 years of age in 1960 demonstrate when compared to 2010? Compare for both white and black. Wow! we all are much smarter. Okay, as Rodney King so aptly stated it "why can' t everbody just get along?"
  22. @WorkingClass
    What do all races, genders, nationalities and creeds have in common? An overwhelming majority of them are working class. That's why I am white and Nationalist but not a White Nationalist. The working class wants work and wages. The ruling class gives us war and welfare. Solidarity is the only effective defense against concentrated wealth. Absent solidarity the working class is a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. Witness the American prole. Simultaneously under the lash and at each others throats.

    The working class wants work and wages.

    Which is a key reason that things are not likely to improve for at least a few more millennia. Accepting wages is a form of slavery, and most folks simply cannot see beyond that trap. The system has evolved so that people readily accept the idea of wages as a necessity (along with the extortion and theft known as taxes). There’s a huge difference between making (earning) a living and holding a job for wages, but I doubt I’ll ever be able to convince anyone of that.

    Tolstoy wrote about the concept of wage slavery over a century ago and it makes good reading to this day.

    “But in reality the abolition of serfdom and of [chattel] slavery was only the abolition of an obsolete form of slavery that had become unnecessary, and the substitution for it of a firmer form of slavery and one that holds a greater number of people in bondage.”

    - Leo Tolstoy

    A few typos, but otherwise a fine summary: Tolstoy, Slavery of Our Times, Chap 8, 11 July, 1900 http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/WorldeBookLibrary.com/slaverytol.htm#1_0_7

    The ruling class gives us war and welfare. Solidarity is the only effective defense against concentrated wealth. Absent solidarity the working class is a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. Witness the American prole. Simultaneously under the lash and at each others throats.

    All true, except the part about solidarity, which would definitely be a huge step in the right direction for us proles and peasants, but is probably as unobtainable as true education of the masses.

    As I see it, the best an individual can do is to toss a monkey wrench into the system whenever we can get away with it, but that requires an understanding of who are enemies are and that seems nearly impossible to achieve. Thus it’s effective only in theory. In practice, it’s probably as ephemeral as a gas emission in a tornado.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WorkingClass
    1 Timothy 5:18 ESV /
    For the Scripture says, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain,” and, “The laborer deserves his wages.”

    Wages are as old as dirt. I can understand why you find them objectionable. But with what will you replace them?

    There’s a huge difference between making (earning) a living and holding a job for wages, but I doubt I’ll ever be able to convince anyone of that.
     
    Try me.

    I was a union man back in the day when private sector unions were active and had support in Washington. We had a contractual relationship with employers that was qualitatively different from serfdom or chattel slavery and a huge improvement over the wage slavery that prevailed before the American labor movement.

    As ideologies go the Anarchists have the best of it. But even they are Utopians. Capitalism sux. There will never be a free market utopia. But neither will there be a workers paradise. Human beings are limited in what they can accomplish by human nature. That's the law. I'm only interested in what works in the real world, however imperfectly.
    , @Logan
    Since you consider "working for wages" as not "making a living," I'm curious what you would consider to constitute "making a living."

    Yeoman farmer?

    Small businessman?

    Bank robber?
  23. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Beckow
    The problem is - as always - with the numbers. The large influx of migrants is changing the demographics and that changes the goals and behaviour of each group. The minority groups can see the promised land in the future when they will take over. The majority knows that they cannot stop it by "equality and reconciliation" (whatever that would mean in practise, maybe endless workshops to whine about each other?).

    The numbers game has gone too far and there is no easy way to restore stability. E.g. the labor markets in the West cannot be fixed without drastic restrictions on supply of new labor from the Third World. The article has some valuable insights, but the lame 'solution' it suggests is useless.

    Another issue not addressed is that many minorities are a majority in their regions leading to a geographic instability by putting borders in question. That separation actually makes sense in many cases.

    What we have had for some time are the elites behaving badly, they have stopped being responsible and thoughtful. The best solution I can see would be for the elites to sober up and start taking their role seriously again. Short of that, we will have chaos, and not the fun type of chaos. Those are the wages of the baby boomer idiocy.

    Short of that, we will have chaos, and not the fun type of chaos.

    Chaos is on the march.

    It appears the minority has magically organized itself and planned a 10-day march from Charlottesville to DC, there to demand the impeachment/removal of Donald Trump, and to carry on a non-violent occupation (irony alert).

    http://thehill.com/homenews/news/348136-ten-day-march-from-charlottesville-to-dc-to-start-monday

    Read More
    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
    I hope they act like they have at every event they have been a part of and the president acts accordingly. Trump needs to hire people to record the whole thing and put it all up on a new website thats created just to host the event. Dozens of live feeds from dozens of angles. All put up on this new website just so there will be no confusion. Once the left riots, because they will riot, National guard needs to be called and these domestic terrorists need to be put down. He then needs to put out an executive order to shut down all propaganda news agencies that are spinning this, and if people want to see what happened, view the live feeds from dozens of angles on the newly created website. And if people bitch about how its wrong to have this up, fuck them. Its time to take off the kiddy gloves.
    , @Anon
    This march isn't a normal protest. The left is going to try to turn it into a violent insurrection to attack Washington and run the Trump administration physcially out of office. The military needs to be there to protect the city, and a large police presence is needed to start grabbing protestors and charging them with riot and insurrection. It's a simple thing to arrange. Just deny them any permit to protest, and they're all automatically guilty of breaking the law if they go ahead. Perfect legal justification to arrest them all.

    Trump needs to crack down and show them he's in charge, not them, and they have to obey the rule of law. They need to be investigated and charged with RICO, and forced to pay fines so large their finances are depleted. We don't need a upper-middle class or a lot of trust fund babies who are fundamentally disloyal to this country, disloyal to their own race, and disloyal to its freely elected government. They have worn out their welcome. Let's wipe out their finances with fines and send them to the back of the line. We need to get rid of them the way the sans-culottes wiped out the rotten French aristocracy. These people deserve to be kicked down into the lower class and forced to struggle their way up again. From a Darwinian perspective, they're disfunctional organisms.
  24. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @unpc downunder
    If you want to lesson the influence of minorities in western democracies, then its essential to provide a more a la carte form of democracy that is less open to elite manipulation. Options include getting rid of political parties and voting directly for heads of government departments, or allowing voters to vote on which party gets to run each of the key government departments.

    It's impossible to have a functional political system when the political parties themselves are allowed to decide what issues voters get to vote on, and can racially divide the electorate by providing policy packages which play to voter weaknesses. This results in absurd results like blacks in the US voting for mass unskilled immigration via the Democrats, and poor American whites voting for increased defense spending and financial liberalisation via the Republicans.

    There is no way around this problem without radically changing the political system.

    then its essential to provide a more a la carte form of democracy that is less open to elite manipulation.

    you mean something like state’s sovereignty, which is what Robert E Lee stood for?

    Read More
  25. @jilles dykstra
    Manipulated majorities are an even greater danger.
    At the last French elections the political elite did anything possible to prevent Front National getting legal political power.
    With fifteen % of the votes, of those who bothered to vote, some 44%, Macron got an absolute majority in French parliament, some 360 seats.
    FN six or so.
    Yet, alas, anyone knows he won the elections, but not the streets.
    As his popularity goes down, Sun King habits, the strikes announced for 11 and 12 September will show who really is in power in France.

    Manipulated majorities are an even greater danger.

    An even bigger threat is the manipulating minorities aka certain (most?) elements of the money bag crowd.

    This problem has been recognized for millennia and was discussed in detail by many early Americans who nevertheless argued in favor of a constitution and a centralized bureaucracy that favored the rich.

    Virtue cannot dwell with wealth either in a city or in a house.

    -Diogenes of Sinope, quoted by Stobaeus, iv. 31c. 88

    But if you will take note of the mode of proceedings of men, you will see that all those who come to great riches and great power have obtained them either by fraud or by force; and afterwards, to hide the ugliness of acquisition, they make it decent by applying the false title of earnings to things they have usurped by deceit or by violence.

    - Niccolo Machiavelli , HISTORY OF FLORENCE AND OF THE AFFAIRS OF ITALY, Book 3 chap 3Para 8

    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2464/2464-h/2464-h.htm#link2H_4_0022

    “…wealth is no proof of moral character; nor poverty of the want of it. On the contrary, wealth is often the presumptive evidence of dishonesty; and poverty the negative evidence of innocence.”

    THOMAS PAINE, DISSERTATION ON FIRST-PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT, 1795

    http://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ecco/004809392.0001.000/1:2?rgn=div1;view=fulltext

    Read More
  26. AfroAmericans who are descended from slaves should take into account the fact that their ancestors were protected because they had value. As a result they now number some 42 million and produced the last President. Comparison with the indigenous natives who after centuries of genocide number about 2 million and are mostly on reservations should give pause.

    https://robertmagill.wordpress.com/2017/08/26/issues-seen-and-not-seen/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    Barack Obama was not the descendant of any African slaves, you idiot.
  27. Dear Saker

    Nonwhites within the borders of the US are not innocent bystanders…They are enthusiastically voting The Historic Native Born White American Majority into a violently persecuted racial minority within the borders of America..

    If you have a greater identification with Muslim “Americans” and Hindu “Americans” than European American Natives…then just go back to Russia..and take the Hindus and Muslims with you.

    It wasn’t very nice of you not to let my comment go through yesterday…in response to commenter Eric….on The Vineyard of the Saker…

    You are waging demographic warfare against my Racial Tribe….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    I didn't see the comment that Saker rejected, however, if it was anything like your other rants then I could not blame the Russian. It behooves you to be calm and sedate when posting your comments... originality would help save it!
  28. @Robert Magill
    AfroAmericans who are descended from slaves should take into account the fact that their ancestors were protected because they had value. As a result they now number some 42 million and produced the last President. Comparison with the indigenous natives who after centuries of genocide number about 2 million and are mostly on reservations should give pause.
    https://robertmagill.wordpress.com/2017/08/26/issues-seen-and-not-seen/

    Barack Obama was not the descendant of any African slaves, you idiot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Francis G.
    Damned right. If anything, he is the descendant of African slave traders. But his skin is sort of black and he's got a funky name, so he can pass as one of the "oppressed" minorities.
    , @Logan
    Actually, if we go back a dozen or two generations, it's probable most people on the planet are descended from both slaveowners and slaves. Especially if you're a little loose with the definition of slave.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Still he raises an interesting comparison. It would make an interesting PhD thesis to trace the two populations from the post small pox nadir of native population on.
    , @sarz
    The Kenyan Obama was not 'Barack Hussein Obama's' biological father. Look up 'Obama's real father', or better, see Wayne Madsen's work on the topic.
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    He didn't say he was. Re-read his comment, see if you can find the real error that's there.
  29. @WorkingClass
    What do all races, genders, nationalities and creeds have in common? An overwhelming majority of them are working class. That's why I am white and Nationalist but not a White Nationalist. The working class wants work and wages. The ruling class gives us war and welfare. Solidarity is the only effective defense against concentrated wealth. Absent solidarity the working class is a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. Witness the American prole. Simultaneously under the lash and at each others throats.

    The Chinese in California are Chinese Race Nationalist…The Hindus in California are Hindu Race Nationalists…You are a Civic Nationalist Cuck.

    Read More
  30. Using minorities as an excuse to oppress majorities is a classic colonial technique. The British set themselves up as the “protectors” of the Muslims in India, the Turks in Cyprus and the Protestants in Ireland, for example. Putin justifies his actions in Ukraine by claiming that he is “protecting” the ethnic Russian minority from the dastardly ethnic Ukrainian majority. Ditto for the various cyber-attacks on Estonia. One assumes that the same treatment would be meted out to the Belarusians if they dared to assert their national sovereignty. The US captive nations legislation the author refers to includes Belarus (designated “White Ruthenia”), Ukraine and the three Baltic republics. I am unaware of any alliance ever having existed, or existing today, between Serbia and Russia. Like “Eurasia”, that “alliance” seems to have been invented by US neocons when they were trying to use Putin as an “asset”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein

    I am unaware of any alliance ever having existed, or existing today, between Serbia and Russia.
     
    There was a little tiff called World War One. It was in a couple of papers.
  31. Saker

    Is it ok with you that the Chinese and Hindus in California voted The Historic Native Born White American Majority in California into a racial minority?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger

    Is it ok with you that the Chinese and Hindus in California voted The Historic Native Born White American Majority in California into a racial minority?
     
    Please elaborate on what you mean. I definitely do not see myself as a racial minority in California.
  32. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    “Manipulated minorities represent a major danger to democratic states.”

    Well, yes. But the manipulation of minorities to change legal frameworks or disassemble governments has been ongoing since the French Revolution. ‘They’ first foster a sense of oppression, more or less justified, then move to grant the new rights. Monarchies suffered the strategy. Europe should know the drill, witness the received oral tradition “Czechoslovaquia is another spelling for Rothschild.”

    Breaking up the US along racial lines is exactly what ‘they’ want. They want the fighting “whites” to come out, give the reason for changes in law. The Trump impeachment is deliberate provocation.

    There has never been a ‘white nation’, it is a silly, ahistorical idea. Nations are built around culture. Fight for the culture. Use the damn high IQ.

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Well..you are wrong about that..America since it's inception has always been a White Nation...If you don't believe me..just ask Professor Noel Ignatieve-the Father of White Studies. Where I differ from Professor Noel Ignatieve:I think it's GREAT that America has historically been a White Nation...as did Socialist Labor Leader Samuel Gompers.


    As far as your last two sentences go:Bring back the 1888 Chinese Legal Immigrant Exclusion Act!!!!

    Saker

    The highly racialized Nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc is the Voting Bloc for War on Christian Russia...not Trump's Whitey Racist Voting Bloc..

  33. @Michael Kenny
    Using minorities as an excuse to oppress majorities is a classic colonial technique. The British set themselves up as the “protectors” of the Muslims in India, the Turks in Cyprus and the Protestants in Ireland, for example. Putin justifies his actions in Ukraine by claiming that he is “protecting” the ethnic Russian minority from the dastardly ethnic Ukrainian majority. Ditto for the various cyber-attacks on Estonia. One assumes that the same treatment would be meted out to the Belarusians if they dared to assert their national sovereignty. The US captive nations legislation the author refers to includes Belarus (designated “White Ruthenia”), Ukraine and the three Baltic republics. I am unaware of any alliance ever having existed, or existing today, between Serbia and Russia. Like “Eurasia”, that “alliance” seems to have been invented by US neocons when they were trying to use Putin as an “asset”.

    I am unaware of any alliance ever having existed, or existing today, between Serbia and Russia.

    There was a little tiff called World War One. It was in a couple of papers.

    Read More
  34. @Issac
    This post would sound eminently reasonable if the white identitarians had any kind of state blessing, but they are a de facto criminal element being suppressed. Not for the sake of democracy, but for the sake of the elite who are Jewish, not Zionist, and not very Anglo.

    White nationalism would have zero credibility if actual white leadership were transparently in control over the state. The wellspring of their support comes from the fact that what whites do exist in the power structure are absolutely and transparently subservient to other interests.

    “White nationalism would have zero credibility if actual white leadership were transparently in control over the state.”

    Nope, but thanks for playing. White nationalism would have zero credibility if the leadership actually promoted American–WASP–interests. There is no escaping the Posterity clause, period. There is no magic dirt, no civic nationalism, no immersion in American culture, that can replace descendants of the English colonists that understand the importance of the Rights of Englishmen. The US was never intended to be the world’s largest rest stop for every poor downtrodden person on Earth. Minorities now all undocumented immigrants since 1965 (Hart-Cellar).

    Homogeneous nation’s are born from Heterogeneous nation’s. We are witnesses to the birth pains. The length of the labor depends on how long the majority will tolerate the minorities. Reconciliation isn’t just impossible–its not even on the table, unless you reverse time. They. Have. To. Go. Back.

    Read More
  35. @Anon
    "Manipulated minorities represent a major danger to democratic states."

    Well, yes. But the manipulation of minorities to change legal frameworks or disassemble governments has been ongoing since the French Revolution. 'They' first foster a sense of oppression, more or less justified, then move to grant the new rights. Monarchies suffered the strategy. Europe should know the drill, witness the received oral tradition "Czechoslovaquia is another spelling for Rothschild."

    Breaking up the US along racial lines is exactly what 'they' want. They want the fighting "whites" to come out, give the reason for changes in law. The Trump impeachment is deliberate provocation.

    There has never been a 'white nation', it is a silly, ahistorical idea. Nations are built around culture. Fight for the culture. Use the damn high IQ.

    Well..you are wrong about that..America since it’s inception has always been a White Nation…If you don’t believe me..just ask Professor Noel Ignatieve-the Father of White Studies. Where I differ from Professor Noel Ignatieve:I think it’s GREAT that America has historically been a White Nation…as did Socialist Labor Leader Samuel Gompers.

    As far as your last two sentences go:Bring back the 1888 Chinese Legal Immigrant Exclusion Act!!!!

    Saker

    The highly racialized Nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc is the Voting Bloc for War on Christian Russia…not Trump’s Whitey Racist Voting Bloc..

    Read More
    • Replies: @Daniel Chieh
    Highly entertaining rants. Never change, Witch of Blair Mountain.
  36. Wally says:
    @jacques sheete
    Excellent piece.

    There is only effective way defuse the explosive potential of minorities:

    Educate minorities and explain to them that they are being manipulated
    Educate those joining anti-minority movements that they are also being manipulated
     
    While those ideas have merit, I predict they'll be impossible to implement. Education is an active process and one cannot "be" educated in the passive sense. People, like other creatures, can be schooled and trained, but that's not the same as acquiring an education.

    There are several reasons why the majority will never acquire any meaningful education. Most people simply do not possess the requisite curiosity to begin any sort of educational process and would rather make decisions based on immediate emotions. A true education requires active questioning of the standing myths and myths are evidently too comfortable for most to discard or even doubt. Most folks appear too lazy and or too timid to face the hard truths and would rather follow the dictates of some slick Peruna peddler.

    A shocking percentage of people apparently love the feeling of "superiority" of "knowing" something even if their belief is utter, easily discardable, hogwash and actively reject any challenges to it. For example, the mindless charge of "conspiracy theorist" is used to dismiss, without thinking, anything but the spoon fed drivel they see on teevee.

    I could go on, but this is already too long and is mostly preaching to the choir.

    Well stated.

    And of course, what ‘education’ would these minorities be given?

    Take a look at what is given them now in our systems.
    Absolute lies about, and hatred of, white gentiles.

    Then there is the simple fact of minorities low IQs.
    What, we think we’re going to train dumb Africans to be engineers?

    By and large these people are unemployable in a modern society.

    The entire matter of somehow ‘educating’ these people in the true sense of the word is laughable.
    Just look at the countries they come from.

    Read More
  37. @Intelligent Dasein
    Barack Obama was not the descendant of any African slaves, you idiot.

    Damned right. If anything, he is the descendant of African slave traders. But his skin is sort of black and he’s got a funky name, so he can pass as one of the “oppressed” minorities.

    Read More
  38. @jacques sheete

    The working class wants work and wages.
     
    Which is a key reason that things are not likely to improve for at least a few more millennia. Accepting wages is a form of slavery, and most folks simply cannot see beyond that trap. The system has evolved so that people readily accept the idea of wages as a necessity (along with the extortion and theft known as taxes). There's a huge difference between making (earning) a living and holding a job for wages, but I doubt I'll ever be able to convince anyone of that.

    Tolstoy wrote about the concept of wage slavery over a century ago and it makes good reading to this day.


    “But in reality the abolition of serfdom and of [chattel] slavery was only the abolition of an obsolete form of slavery that had become unnecessary, and the substitution for it of a firmer form of slavery and one that holds a greater number of people in bondage.”

    - Leo Tolstoy

    A few typos, but otherwise a fine summary: Tolstoy, Slavery of Our Times, Chap 8, 11 July, 1900 http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/WorldeBookLibrary.com/slaverytol.htm#1_0_7


    The ruling class gives us war and welfare. Solidarity is the only effective defense against concentrated wealth. Absent solidarity the working class is a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. Witness the American prole. Simultaneously under the lash and at each others throats.
     
    All true, except the part about solidarity, which would definitely be a huge step in the right direction for us proles and peasants, but is probably as unobtainable as true education of the masses.

    As I see it, the best an individual can do is to toss a monkey wrench into the system whenever we can get away with it, but that requires an understanding of who are enemies are and that seems nearly impossible to achieve. Thus it's effective only in theory. In practice, it's probably as ephemeral as a gas emission in a tornado.

    1 Timothy 5:18 ESV /
    For the Scripture says, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain,” and, “The laborer deserves his wages.”

    Wages are as old as dirt. I can understand why you find them objectionable. But with what will you replace them?

    There’s a huge difference between making (earning) a living and holding a job for wages, but I doubt I’ll ever be able to convince anyone of that.

    Try me.

    I was a union man back in the day when private sector unions were active and had support in Washington. We had a contractual relationship with employers that was qualitatively different from serfdom or chattel slavery and a huge improvement over the wage slavery that prevailed before the American labor movement.

    As ideologies go the Anarchists have the best of it. But even they are Utopians. Capitalism sux. There will never be a free market utopia. But neither will there be a workers paradise. Human beings are limited in what they can accomplish by human nature. That’s the law. I’m only interested in what works in the real world, however imperfectly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Wages are as old as dirt. I can understand why you find them objectionable. But with what will you replace them?
     
    Dear Sir, as I've often stated, I like what you have to say and agree with 99% of it. I also respect the fact that your reply to me was obviously respectful and sincere.

    My usual answer to your question is to replace them with nothing. For example if I had a case of the gleet, I'd rather not replace it; I'd rather do without. Instead of wages and a time clock, I advocate finding other (hopefully respectable) sources of income.

    I realize that in this environment, it's nearly impossible to do without wages, but that shows how much our system sux, hence my objection to them and the system. I pretty much became disgusted with the concept after working at a few jobs that were really akin to slavery or some other unsavory paid profession, so I worked to make a living without punching time clock. That's not to say that I did not receive money for my services, but I managed to do without a direct boss during my earning days. Several other rather cantankerous members of my family manged to do the same, and some still do. I'm not saying that to brag, but to point out that it can be done.

    I do admit that it now seems nearly impossible to do that sort of thing, but a close neighbor, in his thirty's, manages to do that and does quite well. He does have the advantage of both a good work ethic and access to a family business though.

    The bottom line for me is that it's too bad that we have to submit to bosses for the most part to earn a living. From that we seem to learn to submit to other forms of "authority" with little or no questioning, and it seems to be a downhill slide from there. Also, the more power the bosses get, they more they control, and the less chance there is for people to become independent. that's no way to live.
  39. anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Who said this:

    Nature does not know political frontiers. She first puts the living beings on this globe and watches the free game of energies. He who is strongest in courage and industry receives, as her favorite child, the right to be the master of existence.

    If a people limits itself to domestic colonization, at a time when other races cling to greater and greater surfaces of the earth’s soil, it will be forced to exercise self-restriction even while other nations will continue to increase.

    For some day this case will occur, and it will arrive the earlier the smaller the living space is that a people has at its disposal. As, unfortunately only too frequently, the best nations, or, better still, the really unique cultured races, the pillars of all human progress, in their pacifistic blindness decide to renounce the acquisition of new soil in order to content themselves with ‘domestic* colonization, while
    inferior nations know full well how to secure enormous areas on this earth for themselves, this would lead to the following result:

    The culturally superior, but less ruthless, races would have to limit, in consequence of their limited soil, their increase even at a time when the culturally inferior, but more brutal and more natural, people, in consequence of their greater living areas, would be able to increase themselves without limit.

    In other words: the world will, therefore, some day come into the hands of a mankind that is
    inferior in culture but superior in energy and activity.

    For then there will be only two possibilities in the no matter how distant future: either the world will be ruled according to the ideas of our modern democracy, and then the stress of every decision falls on the races which are stronger in numbers, or the world will be dominated according to the law of the natural order of energy, and then the people of brute strength will be victorious, and again, therefore, not the nations of self-restriction.

    But one may well believe that this world will still be subject to the fiercest fights for the existence of mankind.
    In the end, only the urge for self-preservation will eternally succeed. Under its pressure so-called ‘humanity,’ as the expression of a mixture of stupidity, cowardice, and an imaginary superior intelligence, will melt like snow under the March sun. Mankind has grown strong in eternal
    struggles and it will only perish through eternal peace.

    Hint: today in an appearance on an internationally broadcast program, a minion from Foundation for Defense of Democracy (FDD) dismissed as “conspiracy theory” the suggestion that the USA/(Trump admin) is involved in Afghanistan “because Afghanistan has vast lithium resources, which US needs for new technologies” [see this 2010 report, Read More

  40. yeah says:

    Minorities are nothing but trouble, even though political correctness demands that we not see that or dare to say so. History offers not a single – NOT ONE SINGLE – example of harmony and mutual love between the minorities and the majority in any community/country/nation. Prove me wrong, cite one significant exception.

    Don’t cite Italian-Americans and Polish-Americans in the American melting pot. They came with full intent to be melted, they came white, Christian, and western in outlook and culture. They came pre-cooked for the melting pot. Can’t say the same for the Muslims streaming in today. Nor for the Hindus and the Orientals coming in today. Leaving aside the Muslims (not even worth discussing in any talk of assimilation), the Hindus and Orientals today stand aside and apart, both groups highly conscious of their groups’ share in the American pie. The Hispanics will make Spanish the lingua Franca – already largely done in California. So what exactly can the melting of Spanish and English languages produce? Spanglish? No, it will be one or the other, depending on which group acquires demographic majority and sufficient political clout. Who will melt whom?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Texan1
    "The Hispanics will make Spanish the lingua Franca – already largely done in California."

    Lots of my family don't know any Spanish.

  41. @Fran Macadam
    To distill it to an aphorism, "A million guys with one buck, are no match for one guy with a million bucks."

    Unless a million guys are organized.

    Read More
  42. @War for Blair Mountain
    Saker

    Is it ok with you that the Chinese and Hindus in California voted The Historic Native Born White American Majority in California into a racial minority?

    Is it ok with you that the Chinese and Hindus in California voted The Historic Native Born White American Majority in California into a racial minority?

    Please elaborate on what you mean. I definitely do not see myself as a racial minority in California.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nsa
    Non-Hispanic white is now down to 37.7% of the California population as of 2016 according to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts.....probably less if you include all the uncounted illegals.
  43. Art says:

    Manipulated Minorities Represent a Major Danger for Democratic States

    The solution is an easy one – we must abandon the Jew Matrix of identity politics and return to the Christian Matrix of neighborliness.

    Jew thought is about biological identity, and all the fear and hate associated with it – the Christian philosophical mindset is an intellectual entreaty to “love your neighbor as you love yourself.” Hmm – one favors gonad driven actions – the other using our brains to overcome our biology, and make peace and abundance.

    The differences are stark and profound – we can see what the Jew way has brought us – Jew tribalism is killing America and the West.

    If we want a just kind world we cannot abandon philosophical Christianity.

    Philosophical Christianity is not about “the virgin birth” and “the ascension into heaven” – it is about a practical way to peaceably live with each other and build an abundance for all.

    Think Peace — Art

    Read More
  44. nsa says:
    @Cloak And Dagger

    Is it ok with you that the Chinese and Hindus in California voted The Historic Native Born White American Majority in California into a racial minority?
     
    Please elaborate on what you mean. I definitely do not see myself as a racial minority in California.

    Non-Hispanic white is now down to 37.7% of the California population as of 2016 according to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts…..probably less if you include all the uncounted illegals.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ivy
    Will the increased supply of labor result in lower gardening bills? Or take-out food bills?
  45. Ivy says:
    @nsa
    Non-Hispanic white is now down to 37.7% of the California population as of 2016 according to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts.....probably less if you include all the uncounted illegals.

    Will the increased supply of labor result in lower gardening bills? Or take-out food bills?

    Read More
    • Replies: @nsa
    The white trash (as of 2016, down to 37.7% of California's population) has simply been replaced by brown trash in California. The only question remaining is which ethnic elite will run the state.....the jooies or the chinkies or the hindus. Or will the ethnics simply rule via a de facto coalition? Whitey's demise in CA is an accomplished fact.....with AZ and TX soon to follow......and eventually OR, WA, ID, and CO. The efforts of James K. Polk are soon to be fully reversed. And yes, Ivy, you will have employment.....every Chinese has been promised a white house boy and white concubine by 2050.
  46. Logan says:

    “I would even argue that the Empire has created several nation ex nihilo (What in the world is a “Belarussian”?!).”

    Hey, us Anglo-Zionists didn’t create Belarus. That was an indigenous or possibly German puppet state created (sort of) in early 1918. It was then conquered by the Bolsheviks and reborn as the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, a constituent republic of the USSR till it fell apart, at which point it became (sort of) independent.

    The Anglo-Zionists had nothing to do with any of this, with probable exception of the collapse of the USSR.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    Belorusian.
    One r.
    , @anonymous
    Chaim Weizmann, who obtained the Balfour Declaration from the British, and went on to become first president of Israel, hailed from Belarus.
  47. Logan says:
    @jacques sheete

    The working class wants work and wages.
     
    Which is a key reason that things are not likely to improve for at least a few more millennia. Accepting wages is a form of slavery, and most folks simply cannot see beyond that trap. The system has evolved so that people readily accept the idea of wages as a necessity (along with the extortion and theft known as taxes). There's a huge difference between making (earning) a living and holding a job for wages, but I doubt I'll ever be able to convince anyone of that.

    Tolstoy wrote about the concept of wage slavery over a century ago and it makes good reading to this day.


    “But in reality the abolition of serfdom and of [chattel] slavery was only the abolition of an obsolete form of slavery that had become unnecessary, and the substitution for it of a firmer form of slavery and one that holds a greater number of people in bondage.”

    - Leo Tolstoy

    A few typos, but otherwise a fine summary: Tolstoy, Slavery of Our Times, Chap 8, 11 July, 1900 http://ebooks.gutenberg.us/WorldeBookLibrary.com/slaverytol.htm#1_0_7


    The ruling class gives us war and welfare. Solidarity is the only effective defense against concentrated wealth. Absent solidarity the working class is a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. Witness the American prole. Simultaneously under the lash and at each others throats.
     
    All true, except the part about solidarity, which would definitely be a huge step in the right direction for us proles and peasants, but is probably as unobtainable as true education of the masses.

    As I see it, the best an individual can do is to toss a monkey wrench into the system whenever we can get away with it, but that requires an understanding of who are enemies are and that seems nearly impossible to achieve. Thus it's effective only in theory. In practice, it's probably as ephemeral as a gas emission in a tornado.

    Since you consider “working for wages” as not “making a living,” I’m curious what you would consider to constitute “making a living.”

    Yeoman farmer?

    Small businessman?

    Bank robber?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Since you consider “working for wages” as not “making a living,”
     
    That is a false statement. It is both illogical and unreasonable based on what I actually said.

    Working for wages in one of several ways of earning a living. It just happens to be, in my way of thinking, one of the least desirable for many reasons.

    I’m curious what you would consider to constitute “making a living.”

    Yeoman farmer?

    Small businessman?

    Bank robber?
     
    All of the above, and many more.
  48. Logan says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    Barack Obama was not the descendant of any African slaves, you idiot.

    Actually, if we go back a dozen or two generations, it’s probable most people on the planet are descended from both slaveowners and slaves. Especially if you’re a little loose with the definition of slave.

    Read More
  49. Logan says:
    @Bragadocious
    Could it be out of a deep sense of guilt of having committed the only “pan-genocide” in human history


    I guess Saker's never heard of the Ukranian Holodomor, perpetrated by his beloved Russia. And what were Spain, Portugal and Britain up to in the New World? This guy's a left-wing Euro clown.

    If we had ever made a serious consistent effort to kill all the Indians, they’d be gone. But there seem to be quite a few of them still around. About 5M, in fact, considerably more than lived in the boundaries of the USA in 1491.

    Argentina had similar Indian problems during the same time period (late 19th century) we were fighting our final Indian wars. But they had a different approach: extermination.

    Quite successful at it, too. Very few Indians left in Argentina. And they didn’t import any other minorities, which means Argentina is now upwards of 90% “white.” Much more so than USA, in fact.

    Read More
  50. Miro23 says:

    If we accept that minorities are typically much more driven than most of the population, then we also immediately can see why their influence over society is often out of proportion with the numerical demographical “weight”. This has nothing to do with these minorities being more intelligent or more creative and everything to do with them willing to being spend much more time and efforts towards their objectives than most people.

    It’s true that there is greater activism, but the key ingredient is probably ethnic patronage.

    A.H. gave an (approving) explanation of how it works:

    “In the old Austria, nothing could be done without patronage. That’s partly explained by the fact that nine million Germans were in fact rulers, in virtue of an unwritten law, of fifty million non-Germans. This German ruling class took strict care that places should always be found for Germans. For them this was the only method of maintaining themselves in this privileged situation. The Balts of German origin behaved in the same way towards the Slav population.”

    Hitler’s Table Talk. Conversation Nº 109, 15th-16th January 1942

    American Jewry has been following the same policy since the early 1900′s, pushing for Jewish candidates in key placings, who if successful, are expected to return the favour. On a “level playing field” this has a ratchet effect whereby corporate management and key media, finance and government positions can be gradually taken over with Anglos squeezed out in a rather unobvious way (“He wasn’t the right candidate for reasons A,B,C……X,Y,Z”).

    Read More
  51. prusmc says:
    @jacques sheete
    Excellent piece.

    There is only effective way defuse the explosive potential of minorities:

    Educate minorities and explain to them that they are being manipulated
    Educate those joining anti-minority movements that they are also being manipulated
     
    While those ideas have merit, I predict they'll be impossible to implement. Education is an active process and one cannot "be" educated in the passive sense. People, like other creatures, can be schooled and trained, but that's not the same as acquiring an education.

    There are several reasons why the majority will never acquire any meaningful education. Most people simply do not possess the requisite curiosity to begin any sort of educational process and would rather make decisions based on immediate emotions. A true education requires active questioning of the standing myths and myths are evidently too comfortable for most to discard or even doubt. Most folks appear too lazy and or too timid to face the hard truths and would rather follow the dictates of some slick Peruna peddler.

    A shocking percentage of people apparently love the feeling of "superiority" of "knowing" something even if their belief is utter, easily discardable, hogwash and actively reject any challenges to it. For example, the mindless charge of "conspiracy theorist" is used to dismiss, without thinking, anything but the spoon fed drivel they see on teevee.

    I could go on, but this is already too long and is mostly preaching to the choir.

    Jacquez:

    Educate the minorities! I have bwen hearing that for over 50 years. I believe that was a substantial rationale for Federal Aid to education. How has it worked? What does the US Census data show for the indicator median education level persons over 25 years of age in 1960 demonstrate when compared to 2010? Compare for both white and black. Wow! we all are much smarter. Okay, as Rodney King so aptly stated it “why can’ t everbody just get along?”

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    Educate the minorities! I have bwen hearing that for over 50 years. I believe that was a substantial rationale for Federal Aid to education.
     
    Most folks are entirely ineducable and seem to like it that way. Of course, it's a fine sounding pretext for mass brainwashing and it's attendant bureaucracy and source of profits.

    How has it worked?
     
    It's probably worked just as intended but not at all as advertised!

    See John Taylor Gatto and Upton Sinclair's "The Goslings" and the Goosestep" which basically describe schooling in America as a tool for corporations.
  52. Better still, they are making more enemies than they can put to any good use.

    In that world, enemies validate, in the real world, it invites total destruction.

    None of them, being religious and all, never count the costs, which Jesus suggested.

    Read More
  53. @Wally
    Saker tellingly left out direct mention of the usual enemies of free speech.

    The facts are that Jews support Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY, while they demand massive 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe?

    He did say something which deserves praise:

    "I am fully aware that in the typical TV watching westerner any discussion of minorities focusing on their negative potential immediately elicits visions of hammers and sickles, smoking crematoria chimneys, chain gangs, lynchmobs, etc. This is basic and primitive conditioning. Carefully engineered events such as the recent riots in Charlottesville only further reinforce this type of mass conditioning."

    Mass conditioning indeed.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

    "Some stories are true that never happened."
    - Elie Wiesel
     

    okay wally, i’m only going to say this once, so please pay attention. the gas chambers were but one method by which jews were killed. starvation, disease, forced labor, firing squads, killed legions. what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better.
    one last thing: elie wiesel is not the wonderful man he is purported to be.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tim Howells

    what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better?
     
    Well, in several countries you can go to jail, and many have, for saying it was less than 6, so go figure. Norman Finkelstein was destroyed by the "Holocaust Industry" for showing in the simplest terms that if you add up the numbers of supposed "victims" and "survivors", the official figures are patently absurd. The more you dig, the more absurd it gets.
    , @Cloak And Dagger

    the gas chambers were but one method by which jews were killed
     
    There is much contention as to whether even a single jew was killed in a gas chamber. Asserting that statement can land you in jail in much of Europe.
    , @Wally
    No one was killed in any gas chamber by the Germans, period.
    The claims are laughable and scientifically impossible.

    And no 'millions' of any quantity were murdered by the Germans.

    You do not even know the impossible storyline you are absurdly trying to defend, you are a lightweight.

    pay attention now:

    We're talking about an alleged '6M Jews & 5M others' ... 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.
    Note: actually show us excavations & their contents, not some Zionist liar claiming mass graves where none exist, and not showing the alleged, verifiable enormous human remains of Jews.

    The 'holocau$t' Industry now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please show us actual excavated enormous mass graves and their contents that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.
    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?
     
    The "Holocau$t Industry" in court:

    'Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, ... but, but, well, umm, we can't show the court. You must trust us, we're Zionists.'
  54. @WorkingClass
    1 Timothy 5:18 ESV /
    For the Scripture says, “You shall not muzzle an ox when it treads out the grain,” and, “The laborer deserves his wages.”

    Wages are as old as dirt. I can understand why you find them objectionable. But with what will you replace them?

    There’s a huge difference between making (earning) a living and holding a job for wages, but I doubt I’ll ever be able to convince anyone of that.
     
    Try me.

    I was a union man back in the day when private sector unions were active and had support in Washington. We had a contractual relationship with employers that was qualitatively different from serfdom or chattel slavery and a huge improvement over the wage slavery that prevailed before the American labor movement.

    As ideologies go the Anarchists have the best of it. But even they are Utopians. Capitalism sux. There will never be a free market utopia. But neither will there be a workers paradise. Human beings are limited in what they can accomplish by human nature. That's the law. I'm only interested in what works in the real world, however imperfectly.

    Wages are as old as dirt. I can understand why you find them objectionable. But with what will you replace them?

    Dear Sir, as I’ve often stated, I like what you have to say and agree with 99% of it. I also respect the fact that your reply to me was obviously respectful and sincere.

    My usual answer to your question is to replace them with nothing. For example if I had a case of the gleet, I’d rather not replace it; I’d rather do without. Instead of wages and a time clock, I advocate finding other (hopefully respectable) sources of income.

    I realize that in this environment, it’s nearly impossible to do without wages, but that shows how much our system sux, hence my objection to them and the system. I pretty much became disgusted with the concept after working at a few jobs that were really akin to slavery or some other unsavory paid profession, so I worked to make a living without punching time clock. That’s not to say that I did not receive money for my services, but I managed to do without a direct boss during my earning days. Several other rather cantankerous members of my family manged to do the same, and some still do. I’m not saying that to brag, but to point out that it can be done.

    I do admit that it now seems nearly impossible to do that sort of thing, but a close neighbor, in his thirty’s, manages to do that and does quite well. He does have the advantage of both a good work ethic and access to a family business though.

    The bottom line for me is that it’s too bad that we have to submit to bosses for the most part to earn a living. From that we seem to learn to submit to other forms of “authority” with little or no questioning, and it seems to be a downhill slide from there. Also, the more power the bosses get, they more they control, and the less chance there is for people to become independent. that’s no way to live.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WorkingClass
    I understand you quite well I think. I have worked on commission. I have been self employed. For a time I was a soldier. I have worked for wages for mom and pop business and for large corporations and held both union and non union jobs. I did a few years working for a not for profit homeless shelter. I am a Jack of all trades and (unfortunately) master of none.

    On union jobs (IBEW and Teamsters) I had the great benefit of having a contract with my employer that spelled out the duties and privileges of both the worker and the company. This meant that both labor and management worked from the same set of rules. The path to promotion was defined as was the possible cause for termination. Personalities had nothing to do with anything. The boss and I followed the same rules. It was nothing like being subject to the whims and prejudices of one man.

    " For example if I had a case of the gleet, I’d rather not replace it; I’d rather do without."

    Having a "job" can be worse than the gleet.
    Unfortunately a mans gotta eat.

    Thanks for coming back.
  55. @Logan
    Since you consider "working for wages" as not "making a living," I'm curious what you would consider to constitute "making a living."

    Yeoman farmer?

    Small businessman?

    Bank robber?

    Since you consider “working for wages” as not “making a living,”

    That is a false statement. It is both illogical and unreasonable based on what I actually said.

    Working for wages in one of several ways of earning a living. It just happens to be, in my way of thinking, one of the least desirable for many reasons.

    I’m curious what you would consider to constitute “making a living.”

    Yeoman farmer?

    Small businessman?

    Bank robber?

    All of the above, and many more.

    Read More
  56. Skeptikal says:
    @Logan
    "I would even argue that the Empire has created several nation ex nihilo (What in the world is a “Belarussian”?!)."

    Hey, us Anglo-Zionists didn't create Belarus. That was an indigenous or possibly German puppet state created (sort of) in early 1918. It was then conquered by the Bolsheviks and reborn as the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, a constituent republic of the USSR till it fell apart, at which point it became (sort of) independent.

    The Anglo-Zionists had nothing to do with any of this, with probable exception of the collapse of the USSR.

    Belorusian.
    One r.

    Read More
  57. @prusmc
    Jacquez:

    Educate the minorities! I have bwen hearing that for over 50 years. I believe that was a substantial rationale for Federal Aid to education. How has it worked? What does the US Census data show for the indicator median education level persons over 25 years of age in 1960 demonstrate when compared to 2010? Compare for both white and black. Wow! we all are much smarter. Okay, as Rodney King so aptly stated it "why can' t everbody just get along?"

    Educate the minorities! I have bwen hearing that for over 50 years. I believe that was a substantial rationale for Federal Aid to education.

    Most folks are entirely ineducable and seem to like it that way. Of course, it’s a fine sounding pretext for mass brainwashing and it’s attendant bureaucracy and source of profits.

    How has it worked?

    It’s probably worked just as intended but not at all as advertised!

    See John Taylor Gatto and Upton Sinclair’s “The Goslings” and the Goosestep” which basically describe schooling in America as a tool for corporations.

    Read More
  58. @Lawrence Fitton
    okay wally, i'm only going to say this once, so please pay attention. the gas chambers were but one method by which jews were killed. starvation, disease, forced labor, firing squads, killed legions. what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better.
    one last thing: elie wiesel is not the wonderful man he is purported to be.

    what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better?

    Well, in several countries you can go to jail, and many have, for saying it was less than 6, so go figure. Norman Finkelstein was destroyed by the “Holocaust Industry” for showing in the simplest terms that if you add up the numbers of supposed “victims” and “survivors”, the official figures are patently absurd. The more you dig, the more absurd it gets.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    It was more like around 300,000 in all of the German camps since their inception back in the mid-1930's, according to the International Red Cross. And that refers to all camp inmates of all ethnic backgrounds.

    It is entirely possible that many Jews may have been killed on the Eastern Front or in the Soviet Union, but that can hardly be blamed solely upon the Germans, who were not known to be savagely cruel or vengeful- even though the anti-partisan actions may have led to some excesses.

    In any case, there is zero evidence for "millions of Jews" killed by the Germans. There are no mass graves commensurate with such figures, nor is there any documentary evidence of a deliberate plan of "extermination."
    , @Wally
    And that tells the world that the narrative doesn't withstand scrutiny.

    Science, rational thought, & logic simply demolish the 'holocaust' storyline.
    And that's why there are Thought Crime Laws that imprison those who engage in free speech about it.

    Truth is hate to those that hate the truth.

    See the 'holocaust' scam easily & thoroughly debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com
    , @Wizard of Oz
    I ask genuinely, though a bit sceptically, if you can back up your statement that several people have gone to gaol for saying that fewer than 6 million Jews were killed. I am not interested in cases where they went to gaol for something else and also happened to deny the 6 million figure.

    Also can you give a brief (or extended) summary of your reasons for saying Norman Finkelstein was "destroyed". I wasn't aware of him having been shut up or discredited.
  59. The Saker: You are not a “minority.” You are a Caucasian, the European branch, ethnically Russian. You are Christian, specifically Orthodox. You are one of the interesting groups that make up the Caucasian peoples. You have nothing in common with blacks/Asians.

    The Democratic party is the party of nonwhites, non-Christians, sexual degenerates. Manipulation has nothing to do with this. Minorities know they are inferiors. What they are doing is because they realize they can never accomplish what Caucasians/Europeans/ Christians/neopagans have accomplished. This means it is time for separation/deportation/repatriation.

    This is coming. An RCC priest “confessed” to having been in the KKK when he was a teenager. The US Conference of Bishops has established an ad hoc committee to address racism. This is the final nail in the coffin of the RCC. Homosexuals have taken over the priesthood. Priests do not preach about hell, sin, repentance. Now that this KKK priest has been exposed, from now on sermons will only cover “racism,” the worst sin.

    Caucasian Christans/pagans have to deal with the reality that world history can be summed up in two words: IQ, which is tied to race. The past 2000 years of Western civilization united under the RCC are gone. There has to be a new paradigm shift to deal with the future and what needs to be done.

    Read More
  60. @anonymous

    Short of that, we will have chaos, and not the fun type of chaos.
     
    Chaos is on the march.

    It appears the minority has magically organized itself and planned a 10-day march from Charlottesville to DC, there to demand the impeachment/removal of Donald Trump, and to carry on a non-violent occupation (irony alert).


    http://thehill.com/homenews/news/348136-ten-day-march-from-charlottesville-to-dc-to-start-monday

    I hope they act like they have at every event they have been a part of and the president acts accordingly. Trump needs to hire people to record the whole thing and put it all up on a new website thats created just to host the event. Dozens of live feeds from dozens of angles. All put up on this new website just so there will be no confusion. Once the left riots, because they will riot, National guard needs to be called and these domestic terrorists need to be put down. He then needs to put out an executive order to shut down all propaganda news agencies that are spinning this, and if people want to see what happened, view the live feeds from dozens of angles on the newly created website. And if people bitch about how its wrong to have this up, fuck them. Its time to take off the kiddy gloves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Can magic thinking get rid of the First Amendment as you propose?
  61. Mulegino1 says:
    @Tim Howells

    what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better?
     
    Well, in several countries you can go to jail, and many have, for saying it was less than 6, so go figure. Norman Finkelstein was destroyed by the "Holocaust Industry" for showing in the simplest terms that if you add up the numbers of supposed "victims" and "survivors", the official figures are patently absurd. The more you dig, the more absurd it gets.

    It was more like around 300,000 in all of the German camps since their inception back in the mid-1930′s, according to the International Red Cross. And that refers to all camp inmates of all ethnic backgrounds.

    It is entirely possible that many Jews may have been killed on the Eastern Front or in the Soviet Union, but that can hardly be blamed solely upon the Germans, who were not known to be savagely cruel or vengeful- even though the anti-partisan actions may have led to some excesses.

    In any case, there is zero evidence for “millions of Jews” killed by the Germans. There are no mass graves commensurate with such figures, nor is there any documentary evidence of a deliberate plan of “extermination.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tim Howells

    There are no mass graves commensurate with such figures, nor is there any documentary evidence of a deliberate plan of “extermination.”
     
    And even though the British famously had broken the German secret codes by the time the event was allegedly occurring, there is not a trace of this logistically incredible feat in a single intercepted communication.
  62. @jacques sheete

    Wages are as old as dirt. I can understand why you find them objectionable. But with what will you replace them?
     
    Dear Sir, as I've often stated, I like what you have to say and agree with 99% of it. I also respect the fact that your reply to me was obviously respectful and sincere.

    My usual answer to your question is to replace them with nothing. For example if I had a case of the gleet, I'd rather not replace it; I'd rather do without. Instead of wages and a time clock, I advocate finding other (hopefully respectable) sources of income.

    I realize that in this environment, it's nearly impossible to do without wages, but that shows how much our system sux, hence my objection to them and the system. I pretty much became disgusted with the concept after working at a few jobs that were really akin to slavery or some other unsavory paid profession, so I worked to make a living without punching time clock. That's not to say that I did not receive money for my services, but I managed to do without a direct boss during my earning days. Several other rather cantankerous members of my family manged to do the same, and some still do. I'm not saying that to brag, but to point out that it can be done.

    I do admit that it now seems nearly impossible to do that sort of thing, but a close neighbor, in his thirty's, manages to do that and does quite well. He does have the advantage of both a good work ethic and access to a family business though.

    The bottom line for me is that it's too bad that we have to submit to bosses for the most part to earn a living. From that we seem to learn to submit to other forms of "authority" with little or no questioning, and it seems to be a downhill slide from there. Also, the more power the bosses get, they more they control, and the less chance there is for people to become independent. that's no way to live.

    I understand you quite well I think. I have worked on commission. I have been self employed. For a time I was a soldier. I have worked for wages for mom and pop business and for large corporations and held both union and non union jobs. I did a few years working for a not for profit homeless shelter. I am a Jack of all trades and (unfortunately) master of none.

    On union jobs (IBEW and Teamsters) I had the great benefit of having a contract with my employer that spelled out the duties and privileges of both the worker and the company. This meant that both labor and management worked from the same set of rules. The path to promotion was defined as was the possible cause for termination. Personalities had nothing to do with anything. The boss and I followed the same rules. It was nothing like being subject to the whims and prejudices of one man.

    ” For example if I had a case of the gleet, I’d rather not replace it; I’d rather do without.”

    Having a “job” can be worse than the gleet.
    Unfortunately a mans gotta eat.

    Thanks for coming back.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    I, too, think I understand from whence you come.

    I agree with the concept of labor unions but recognize that they too can be turned against the interests of the workers, and unfortunately, have been.

    I do applaud you for your success working within the system and I have no doubt that you did it as a sincere, able and good man. I also respect your views and thank you for sharing them.

    As for bosses, I loathe them so much that I myself never hired employees because I didn't want to be a boss any more than I wanted to answer to one. I almost get physically sick when I see that the window of opportunity for youngsters to follow a independent lifestyle is next to nil and getting tougher all the time.

    I do still counsel my younger relatives to acquire as much experience as they can so that they are in a position to have some control over their own lives. I'm also actively involved in fortifying my grandkids with both defiance and the attitudes and skills to back it up.

    Is that attitude Utopian? No doubt to some degree it is, but so is the attitude of submission, i.e., the wish for everything to be taken care of so long as one submits.
  63. nsa says:
    @Ivy
    Will the increased supply of labor result in lower gardening bills? Or take-out food bills?

    The white trash (as of 2016, down to 37.7% of California’s population) has simply been replaced by brown trash in California. The only question remaining is which ethnic elite will run the state…..the jooies or the chinkies or the hindus. Or will the ethnics simply rule via a de facto coalition? Whitey’s demise in CA is an accomplished fact…..with AZ and TX soon to follow……and eventually OR, WA, ID, and CO. The efforts of James K. Polk are soon to be fully reversed. And yes, Ivy, you will have employment…..every Chinese has been promised a white house boy and white concubine by 2050.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ivy
    I'll be long dead by 2050 but will miss those Chinese masseuses.
  64. Ivy says:
    @nsa
    The white trash (as of 2016, down to 37.7% of California's population) has simply been replaced by brown trash in California. The only question remaining is which ethnic elite will run the state.....the jooies or the chinkies or the hindus. Or will the ethnics simply rule via a de facto coalition? Whitey's demise in CA is an accomplished fact.....with AZ and TX soon to follow......and eventually OR, WA, ID, and CO. The efforts of James K. Polk are soon to be fully reversed. And yes, Ivy, you will have employment.....every Chinese has been promised a white house boy and white concubine by 2050.

    I’ll be long dead by 2050 but will miss those Chinese masseuses.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Hopefully, you will die in ripe old age while getting a happy-ending...
  65. @Lawrence Fitton
    okay wally, i'm only going to say this once, so please pay attention. the gas chambers were but one method by which jews were killed. starvation, disease, forced labor, firing squads, killed legions. what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better.
    one last thing: elie wiesel is not the wonderful man he is purported to be.

    the gas chambers were but one method by which jews were killed

    There is much contention as to whether even a single jew was killed in a gas chamber. Asserting that statement can land you in jail in much of Europe.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete

    There is much contention as to whether even a single jew was killed in a gas chamber.
     
    Not only is there much contention, but there is no credible evidence that it really happened. Besides, the numbers are farcical.

    Where do they get 6 million?

    “Allowing for a maximum of 100,000 who succeeded in emigrating from Europe, this would bring the total number of Jews under the direct rule of Nazi Germany to about 3,200,000.”

    Distribution of the Jewish Population of Europe 1933-. 1940," prepared by Mr. Moses Moskowitz
    AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK 1941-1942, page 662

    http://www.ajcarchives.org/AJC_DATA/Files/1941_1942_9_Statistics.pdf
     
    I haven't checked in a while, but I wonder if the link is still active...
  66. anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @Logan
    "I would even argue that the Empire has created several nation ex nihilo (What in the world is a “Belarussian”?!)."

    Hey, us Anglo-Zionists didn't create Belarus. That was an indigenous or possibly German puppet state created (sort of) in early 1918. It was then conquered by the Bolsheviks and reborn as the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, a constituent republic of the USSR till it fell apart, at which point it became (sort of) independent.

    The Anglo-Zionists had nothing to do with any of this, with probable exception of the collapse of the USSR.

    Chaim Weizmann, who obtained the Balfour Declaration from the British, and went on to become first president of Israel, hailed from Belarus.

    Read More
  67. hunor says:

    the same tolerant technology has been applied five thousand years ago in the Sumerian civilization
    what was a non semitic composed society. Few hundred years prior to the destruction of that culture
    semitic tribes were allowed to settle in, first in smaller numbers , then in the name of tolerance larger migrating groups were allowed , and enjoyed benefits of education, comfortable, cultured living. The original majority of the population were builders and workers , the migrants for the most part were users, who’s interest were to find an easy way to become the more. The complete opposite of mentality. In time the semitic migrants were able to build up a fifth column , moved in to powerful positions such as religion and astrology , and from then on destruction has begun. The original populous were pushed out, part of them were forcefully crossbred , the rest of them flee and
    build new countries in Europa . The migrants of that time gained written culture , tailored clothing ,
    the benefit of toilet so not to go to the bushes to relieve themselves . This time around there is no place left to flee.

    Read More
  68. @WorkingClass
    I understand you quite well I think. I have worked on commission. I have been self employed. For a time I was a soldier. I have worked for wages for mom and pop business and for large corporations and held both union and non union jobs. I did a few years working for a not for profit homeless shelter. I am a Jack of all trades and (unfortunately) master of none.

    On union jobs (IBEW and Teamsters) I had the great benefit of having a contract with my employer that spelled out the duties and privileges of both the worker and the company. This meant that both labor and management worked from the same set of rules. The path to promotion was defined as was the possible cause for termination. Personalities had nothing to do with anything. The boss and I followed the same rules. It was nothing like being subject to the whims and prejudices of one man.

    " For example if I had a case of the gleet, I’d rather not replace it; I’d rather do without."

    Having a "job" can be worse than the gleet.
    Unfortunately a mans gotta eat.

    Thanks for coming back.

    I, too, think I understand from whence you come.

    I agree with the concept of labor unions but recognize that they too can be turned against the interests of the workers, and unfortunately, have been.

    I do applaud you for your success working within the system and I have no doubt that you did it as a sincere, able and good man. I also respect your views and thank you for sharing them.

    As for bosses, I loathe them so much that I myself never hired employees because I didn’t want to be a boss any more than I wanted to answer to one. I almost get physically sick when I see that the window of opportunity for youngsters to follow a independent lifestyle is next to nil and getting tougher all the time.

    I do still counsel my younger relatives to acquire as much experience as they can so that they are in a position to have some control over their own lives. I’m also actively involved in fortifying my grandkids with both defiance and the attitudes and skills to back it up.

    Is that attitude Utopian? No doubt to some degree it is, but so is the attitude of submission, i.e., the wish for everything to be taken care of so long as one submits.

    Read More
    • Replies: @WorkingClass
    I don't see the desire for independence or the decision to resist or submit as ideological. Most people in my experience don't know they have a choice. You have made your choice and I say more power to you. Thank you for your patience in conveying your point of view. Go in peace jacques sheete.
  69. @Cloak And Dagger

    the gas chambers were but one method by which jews were killed
     
    There is much contention as to whether even a single jew was killed in a gas chamber. Asserting that statement can land you in jail in much of Europe.

    There is much contention as to whether even a single jew was killed in a gas chamber.

    Not only is there much contention, but there is no credible evidence that it really happened. Besides, the numbers are farcical.

    Where do they get 6 million?

    “Allowing for a maximum of 100,000 who succeeded in emigrating from Europe, this would bring the total number of Jews under the direct rule of Nazi Germany to about 3,200,000.”

    Distribution of the Jewish Population of Europe 1933-. 1940,” prepared by Mr. Moses Moskowitz
    AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK 1941-1942, page 662

    http://www.ajcarchives.org/AJC_DATA/Files/1941_1942_9_Statistics.pdf

    I haven’t checked in a while, but I wonder if the link is still active…

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    ...there were MORE "holocaust ™" survivors immediately AFTER WW2 than there were populating all of Europe and Palestine at the time.
    You see, anyone who claims jewish ancestry is automatically a "holocaust ™" survivor...
    , @Cloak And Dagger
    Well, it continues to be terminal in Europe to question the Holocaust and the myth of gassing jews. They don't hesitate to throw grandmothers in jail for questioning this sacred event:

    ′Nazi grandma′ Ursula Haverbeck sent to prison for holocaust denial
    http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/nazi-grandma-ursula-haverbeck-sent-prison-holocaust-denial-1637098


    An 88-year-old woman known as the 'Nazi grandma' has been sentenced to two years in jail for denying the holocaust and inciting hatred. Holocaust denier Ursula Haverbeck was handed a two-year prison sentence after she lost her appeal to reverse a 10-month sentence she received earlier this year.

    Earlier this year, Haverbeck was found guilty of sedition, the offence of inciting others to hatred and rebellion, after she published several articles in which she denied that the holocaust occurred in local newspaper Stimme des Reiches (Voices of the Reich).

    She also wrote a letter to the mayor of Detmold, a city in northern Germany, in which she referred to Auschwitz as a "lie" and claimed that the concentration camp was not an extermination camp, but rather a work camp.

    She denied that Nazis had gassed Jewish people to death, claiming that it was "not historically proven."

     

    I can't think of a single historical event other than this one that relegates an investigator to prison merely for casting doubt on its occurrence. There are people running around claiming that the Earth is flat, and nobody has been imprisoned for such scientific blasphemy. Why this one?
  70. Jake says:

    “I submit that the real truth is totally different. My thesis is very simple: the reason why the US always support foreign minorities to subvert states and use domestic minorities to suppress the majority US population is because minorities are very easy to manipulate and because minorities present no threat to the real rulers of the AngloZionist Empire. That’s all there is to it.”

    That is pretty much it, save for the origins. WASP culture’s Germanic basis began by hating the native British Isles. That set the pattern:WASPs most hate those from whom they steal or otherwise wrong gravely. The Reformation provided the perfect theological and philosophical justifications for that pattern to become something much greater.

    The Anglo-Saxon Puritans were Judaizing heretics. You cannot over-emphasize that point. WASAP culture from the moment it was crystalized, truly formed, was one that saw the world through Jewish-influenced, Jewish-fawning, eyes. Naturally and inevitably, once the true WASPs gained total control of the government, with the Puritan Revolution, their fearless leader, Oliver Cromwell, allied with Jews. He took Jewish money to wage war, to exterminate cultures and make at least virtual serfs of whole populations.

    White Christian populations.

    WASP culture began with an alliance with Jews, allowing Jews back into England, with special rights and privileges that the vast majority of British Isles native Christians did not have, that allowed the WASPs to continue waging war to exterminate white Christian cultures.

    When WASPs encountered non-whites, they began to grasp the value of using them – non-whites and non-Christians – as tools and weapons with which to batter the white Christians they wished to destroy.

    That is the reason the ‘Anglo-Zionist Empire’ uses minorities as it does.

    You cannot separate the Jewish Problem from the WASP Problem. You cannot solve the Jewish Problem without solving the ‘WASP Problem.

    Read More
  71. @Grandpa Charlie
    Another point:

    The poorer people are, the more vulnerable they are to identity politics.

    It's like an Indian movie I once saw that was constructed as a family history. When the family experienced many setbacks, one after another, until they were all disheartened, the patriarch of the family spoke up, saying, "Remember, we are Bengali!" That was the turning point in the film: after that things began to improve for the family so that the film could have a happy Bolliwood ending.

    That was like saying, "Remember, we have a proud history!"

    There was also a Yiddish joke that someone told me, like this: There was a young Jewish man in some place like Minsk, somewhere in Eastern Europe, and he saw an advertisement by none other than a great member of the Rothschild banking family. The ad said "Wanted: young Jewish man for difficult and physically challenging assignment." So the hero (or anti-hero?) of this story set out immediately for Paris. Unfortunately, our hero experienced many tragedies, even losing an arm and a leg. But he was determined and he persevered, with the help of a crutch. Finally, he had to camp out in front of the gate of the Rothschild mansion outside of Paris. Eventually, the great Rothschild had his carriage stop and spoke to the man, saying, "You know, I've seen you standing here day after day ... what is it that you want?" Our hero brought out the advertisement that he had carried with him through all his misadventures. The great Rothschild read the advertisement and exclaimed, "What's the matter with you? Did you not read that the job was physically challenging?" To which our hero responded, "Yes, but, Mr. Rothschild, the ad says "young Jewish man."

    Being myself a gentile, I did not at first get the joke, but eventually I got a chuckle out of it.

    Get the Apu trilogy by the late Satyajit Ray if you’re into varied cinema… You won’t be disappointed!

    Read More
  72. @War for Blair Mountain
    Dear Saker

    Nonwhites within the borders of the US are not innocent bystanders...They are enthusiastically voting The Historic Native Born White American Majority into a violently persecuted racial minority within the borders of America..

    If you have a greater identification with Muslim "Americans" and Hindu "Americans" than European American Natives...then just go back to Russia..and take the Hindus and Muslims with you.


    It wasn't very nice of you not to let my comment go through yesterday...in response to commenter Eric....on The Vineyard of the Saker...

    You are waging demographic warfare against my Racial Tribe....

    I didn’t see the comment that Saker rejected, however, if it was anything like your other rants then I could not blame the Russian. It behooves you to be calm and sedate when posting your comments… originality would help save it!

    Read More
  73. @Ivy
    I'll be long dead by 2050 but will miss those Chinese masseuses.

    Hopefully, you will die in ripe old age while getting a happy-ending…

    Read More
  74. The Saker always writes interesting, informative, and sometimes provocative articles. The problem with this particular article is that terms like “majorities,” “minorities,” and “democracies,” are rather misleading in that few, if any real democracies still exist. I certainly know of none. But then the only nation I am that well acquainted with to have an informed opinion about is the United States. And the United States has never been one in my 80 years of life as a black man. I suppose the US came closest to being one in 1965 with the signing of the Voting Rights Act. But with the assassinations of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy and many other black and white leaders and the imprisonment of thousands more, that brief “excess of democracy,” as the right-wing called it, was quickly crushed. Today we have no democracy at all, as Trump’s speech on Afghanistan clearly shows. What we have, instead, is a made-for-TV “democracy” melodrama , in which now “minorities,” now “majorities,” are roused to perform certain democratic “roles.” However, if they go “off script,” they are quickly silenced. It’s all for show. Yes, as in the early days of the Roman Empire under Augustus, where certain dramatic forms of a republic, such as voting, are preserved for a time, it is possible for a majority or even a very vocal minority to disrupt the show for a moment, as in the election of Donald Trump. But then as they say: “The dog barks once; and the caravan moves on.” To strain the metaphor a bit: Has the Saker no idea of where the caravan is headed right now? THE SAKER IS ABOUT TO BE CLOSED DOWN. AS IS THE UNZ REVIEW, RT, SPUTNIK, ANTIWAR.COM, AND EVERY OVER NON-MAINSTREAM-MEDIA SITE. IN THE US ANYWAY. The Deep State believes that it has now created enough of a new Red Scare that it will not encounter significant opposition if it basically ends free speech in this country under the guise of “protecting” the public from pro-Russian, pro-Putin, pro-peace, pro-human-survival propaganda. And if that does happen and all dissent and contact with external reality is cut off long enough, the majority can be persuaded to believe ever crazier things, as happened to the increasingly delusional Nazi Germany of the 1930′s that, in turn, became the totally psychotic Nazi Germany of the 1940′s. IT CAN AND IS HAPPENING HERE–NOW!

    Read More
  75. @jacques sheete
    I, too, think I understand from whence you come.

    I agree with the concept of labor unions but recognize that they too can be turned against the interests of the workers, and unfortunately, have been.

    I do applaud you for your success working within the system and I have no doubt that you did it as a sincere, able and good man. I also respect your views and thank you for sharing them.

    As for bosses, I loathe them so much that I myself never hired employees because I didn't want to be a boss any more than I wanted to answer to one. I almost get physically sick when I see that the window of opportunity for youngsters to follow a independent lifestyle is next to nil and getting tougher all the time.

    I do still counsel my younger relatives to acquire as much experience as they can so that they are in a position to have some control over their own lives. I'm also actively involved in fortifying my grandkids with both defiance and the attitudes and skills to back it up.

    Is that attitude Utopian? No doubt to some degree it is, but so is the attitude of submission, i.e., the wish for everything to be taken care of so long as one submits.

    I don’t see the desire for independence or the decision to resist or submit as ideological. Most people in my experience don’t know they have a choice. You have made your choice and I say more power to you. Thank you for your patience in conveying your point of view. Go in peace jacques sheete.

    Read More
  76. @Intelligent Dasein
    Barack Obama was not the descendant of any African slaves, you idiot.

    Still he raises an interesting comparison. It would make an interesting PhD thesis to trace the two populations from the post small pox nadir of native population on.

    Read More
  77. Wally says: • Website
    @Lawrence Fitton
    okay wally, i'm only going to say this once, so please pay attention. the gas chambers were but one method by which jews were killed. starvation, disease, forced labor, firing squads, killed legions. what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better.
    one last thing: elie wiesel is not the wonderful man he is purported to be.

    No one was killed in any gas chamber by the Germans, period.
    The claims are laughable and scientifically impossible.

    And no ‘millions’ of any quantity were murdered by the Germans.

    You do not even know the impossible storyline you are absurdly trying to defend, you are a lightweight.

    [MORE]

    pay attention now:

    We’re talking about an alleged ’6M Jews & 5M others’ … 11,000,000.
    There is not a single verifiable excavated enormous mass grave with contents actually SHOWN, not just claimed, (recall the claim of 900,000 buried at Treblinka, 1,250,000 at Auschwitz, or 250,000 at Sobibor, 34,000 at Babi Yar) even though Jews claim they still exist and claim to know exactly where these alleged enormous mass graves are.
    Note: actually show us excavations & their contents, not some Zionist liar claiming mass graves where none exist, and not showing the alleged, verifiable enormous human remains of Jews.

    The ‘holocau$t’ Industry now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please show us actual excavated enormous mass graves and their contents that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.
    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?

    The “Holocau$t Industry” in court:

    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, … but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    Read More
  78. Wally says: • Website
    @Tim Howells

    what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better?
     
    Well, in several countries you can go to jail, and many have, for saying it was less than 6, so go figure. Norman Finkelstein was destroyed by the "Holocaust Industry" for showing in the simplest terms that if you add up the numbers of supposed "victims" and "survivors", the official figures are patently absurd. The more you dig, the more absurd it gets.

    And that tells the world that the narrative doesn’t withstand scrutiny.

    Science, rational thought, & logic simply demolish the ‘holocaust’ storyline.
    And that’s why there are Thought Crime Laws that imprison those who engage in free speech about it.

    Truth is hate to those that hate the truth.

    [MORE]

    See the ‘holocaust’ scam easily & thoroughly debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Hey, here's an interesting fact. Of all the immigrant groups in the United States, the group with the highest percentage holding PhDs is Nigerians -- 4% of them have doctorates. That's in addition to their very high percentages holding bachelor's and master's degrees. Also, many Nigerian immigrants send their children back to Nigeria for boarding school before college.

    And Nigerians aren't alone in doing well academically or economically among African immigrants. Immigrants from Ghana, Malawi, Botswana, and Kenya all do pretty well when coming here. Interestingly, among engineers who are black, the clear majority are of recent African ancestry rather than African American -- again, Nigerians form the largest percentage.

    Now, you make a good point -- look at the countries they come from. None of the countries listed above are particularly nice. Presumably, you'd say the same thing about an immigrant from Belfast, or Belgrade? People immigrate in part because they want to leave terrible places. That's hardly a surprise.

    But the other point to note about the countries sending the most successful immigrants from Africa to the U.S. is this: They all have very large natural resources, they all have enjoyed relative political stability, and they all have English as an official language, so if you come from the middle class in one of these countries and attend a high school, it's likely that you speak fluent English.

    So here's the rub: African American by and large come from the same part of Africa as Nigerians and Ghanains, particularly the latter (Malawi and Botswana are in southern Africa; Kenya is east central). So why don't American blacks do as well as Nigerians and Ghanaians? Because it would seem to me that genetics is going to fail as an explanation. Wanna give it a try?
  79. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @anonymous

    Short of that, we will have chaos, and not the fun type of chaos.
     
    Chaos is on the march.

    It appears the minority has magically organized itself and planned a 10-day march from Charlottesville to DC, there to demand the impeachment/removal of Donald Trump, and to carry on a non-violent occupation (irony alert).


    http://thehill.com/homenews/news/348136-ten-day-march-from-charlottesville-to-dc-to-start-monday

    This march isn’t a normal protest. The left is going to try to turn it into a violent insurrection to attack Washington and run the Trump administration physcially out of office. The military needs to be there to protect the city, and a large police presence is needed to start grabbing protestors and charging them with riot and insurrection. It’s a simple thing to arrange. Just deny them any permit to protest, and they’re all automatically guilty of breaking the law if they go ahead. Perfect legal justification to arrest them all.

    Trump needs to crack down and show them he’s in charge, not them, and they have to obey the rule of law. They need to be investigated and charged with RICO, and forced to pay fines so large their finances are depleted. We don’t need a upper-middle class or a lot of trust fund babies who are fundamentally disloyal to this country, disloyal to their own race, and disloyal to its freely elected government. They have worn out their welcome. Let’s wipe out their finances with fines and send them to the back of the line. We need to get rid of them the way the sans-culottes wiped out the rotten French aristocracy. These people deserve to be kicked down into the lower class and forced to struggle their way up again. From a Darwinian perspective, they’re disfunctional organisms.

    Read More
  80. @Mulegino1
    It was more like around 300,000 in all of the German camps since their inception back in the mid-1930's, according to the International Red Cross. And that refers to all camp inmates of all ethnic backgrounds.

    It is entirely possible that many Jews may have been killed on the Eastern Front or in the Soviet Union, but that can hardly be blamed solely upon the Germans, who were not known to be savagely cruel or vengeful- even though the anti-partisan actions may have led to some excesses.

    In any case, there is zero evidence for "millions of Jews" killed by the Germans. There are no mass graves commensurate with such figures, nor is there any documentary evidence of a deliberate plan of "extermination."

    There are no mass graves commensurate with such figures, nor is there any documentary evidence of a deliberate plan of “extermination.”

    And even though the British famously had broken the German secret codes by the time the event was allegedly occurring, there is not a trace of this logistically incredible feat in a single intercepted communication.

    Read More
  81. Pilger says:

    Bragadocious, I am not sure what the Saker knows about Holodomor, but I do know a thing or two about it, especially as my own grandparents have been affected by it.

    So let me clarify a few points. Holodomor was not perpetrated by Russia against Ukraine. It was perpetrated by the Stalinist Communist government of the USSR against all peasants of the USSR. It did not affect only Ukraine, it affected all the Soviet countryside – Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc., etc., etc. (Stalin, by the way, was not an ethnic Russian, he was a Georgian, his real name was Jugashvili).

    It was a famine caused by the collectivisation – forced unification of private peasant households into collective farms, in the course of which millions of wealthier peasants all over the Soviet Union suffered confiscation of their property and, more often than not, were exiled into the more inhospitable parts of the country were they lived and often died in absolutely conditions. Some were arrested and killed. As a result, the Soviet agricultural output plummeted and large numbers of people died of hunger, while others suffered severe food shortages.

    Ukrainians have no privilege of suffering. They just complain more loudly than others.

    As for modern Ukraine, it has developed in an ultranationalist State where the nationalistic majority is persecuting the Russian-speaking minority. There is also a lot of anti-Semitism (not surprising, as modern Ukraine has proclaimed the notorious nazi butcher Bandera its national hero). Some other minorities, like ethnic Hungarians are not feeling comfortable in modern Ukraine either. But the Ukrainian regime is trying (rather clumsily) to instrumentalise Crimean Tartars in their struggle against Russia.

    If you need an example of a majority oppressing a minority, look at Ukraine. It is a good one.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Bragadocious
    Thanks for that wall of text. Doesn't change a thing. It was a form of extermination, committed by Russia, as the USSR was centered in Russia. Stalin's place of birth has fuck all to do with anything. You're trying to employ some fancy footwork to exonerate Russia for reasons I can only guess at, but it won't work. Saker's still a left-wing Euro tool.
    , @AP

    Ukrainians have no privilege of suffering. They just complain more loudly than others.
     
    Ukrainians were starved at a higher rate than other ethnicities within Ukraine and throughout the USSR. Ukrainians were about 1/3 the Soviet population but about 1/2 the starvation victims.

    modern Ukraine has proclaimed the notorious nazi butcher Bandera its national hero)
     
    Bandera was obviously a bad guy, but the Russians building him up as some unheard-of monster is ridiculous. His followers killed up to 100,000 Poles (or as little as 60,000) and around 50,000 Jews within Ukraine. They wanted to cleanse Ukraine of perceived enemies, colonists and occupiers. They weren't interested in invading anyone, but brutally murdered these non-Ukrainians, women and children among them, in Ukraine (note that Banderists were active in Krakow and Warsaw but unlike Chechens in Moscow they didn't kill civilians there, they had no problems with Poles being in Poland).

    At the same time Banderists killed up to 100,000-150,000 people in Ukraine, Americans and Brits murdered millions of German and Japanese civilians. Burned them alive through terror bombing, or nuked them (a horrible slow death for those not right under the bomb). Poland had occupied Ukraine and claimed its territory, but what did the Germans do the the Americans? And the of course we can examine Soviet atrocities.

    The same people whining about Bandera in Ukraine, often whine about Lenin statues being pulled down. Before he died, Lenin's regime murdered millions. Funny, no?


    the nationalistic majority is persecuting the Russian-speaking minority.
     
    Which is also exaggerated in the Russian media.
  82. @Tim Howells

    what if it was only 4 million jews who perished in the camps? or 3? does that make it better?
     
    Well, in several countries you can go to jail, and many have, for saying it was less than 6, so go figure. Norman Finkelstein was destroyed by the "Holocaust Industry" for showing in the simplest terms that if you add up the numbers of supposed "victims" and "survivors", the official figures are patently absurd. The more you dig, the more absurd it gets.

    I ask genuinely, though a bit sceptically, if you can back up your statement that several people have gone to gaol for saying that fewer than 6 million Jews were killed. I am not interested in cases where they went to gaol for something else and also happened to deny the 6 million figure.

    Also can you give a brief (or extended) summary of your reasons for saying Norman Finkelstein was “destroyed”. I wasn’t aware of him having been shut up or discredited.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tim Howells

    I ask genuinely, though a bit sceptically, if you can back up your statement that several people have gone to gaol for saying that fewer than 6 million Jews were killed. I am not interested in cases where they went to gaol for something else and also happened to deny the 6 million figure.
     
    For a dispassionate summary see the Wikipedia entry on Laws against Holocaust denial, which is defined as "the denial of the systematic genocidal killing of 6 million Jews and people of various ethnic groups in Europe by Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 1940s." Twenty victims of this legal persecution are listed, with brief summaries of their offenses, including disputing the 6- million number.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_against_Holocaust_denial

    The sacrosanct nature of the 6-million figure is witnessed by the fact that when the death count at Auschwitz was reduced by over 2-million this had no effect on the overall total of 6-million.

    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-05-07/news/9202100662_1_death-wall-auschwitz-memorials

    Also can you give a brief (or extended) summary of your reasons for saying Norman Finkelstein was “destroyed”. I wasn’t aware of him having been shut up or discredited.
     
    I should not have said that Finkelstein was destroyed, since he is still a prolific and important writer, including even here at Unz. His academic career was devastated however. After a series of prestigious academic appointments he was up for tenure at DePaul, when the Holocaust Industry spearheaded by Alan Dershowitz intervened.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Finkelstein#Tenure_denial_and_resignation

    Since that time his academic career has been limited to an obscure school in Turkey as far as I know. To get a good feeling exactly what it's like to be targeted by these people see the documentary Defamation, which just happened to have interviews with Finkelstein ongoing when the hammer came down.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNWF9CeoZdE
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    Perhaps google "Gayssot Act".
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    You could also search for, "people who have gone to jail for holocaust denial". It is true: google is your friend.
  83. @Delinquent Snail
    I hope they act like they have at every event they have been a part of and the president acts accordingly. Trump needs to hire people to record the whole thing and put it all up on a new website thats created just to host the event. Dozens of live feeds from dozens of angles. All put up on this new website just so there will be no confusion. Once the left riots, because they will riot, National guard needs to be called and these domestic terrorists need to be put down. He then needs to put out an executive order to shut down all propaganda news agencies that are spinning this, and if people want to see what happened, view the live feeds from dozens of angles on the newly created website. And if people bitch about how its wrong to have this up, fuck them. Its time to take off the kiddy gloves.

    Can magic thinking get rid of the First Amendment as you propose?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
    Seeing as that amendment has already been stomped on so many times in the last 2 decades, im not sure why you think it would be a problem.

    Especially seeing as how the major news outlets are starting a civil war by fanning the race flame. They lie regulary, and ommit facts that contradict their lies.

    The left has been shutting down free speech, freedom of press, and the right to assemble. Examples: talking about how blacks are more likely to rob and kill, hate speech, you can lose everything for it. The major media networks pushed the "fake news" story and blacklisted how many sites?
    Everytime peaceful americans get together legally to oppose the powers that be and defend the first amendment, who shows up?
  84. sarz says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    Barack Obama was not the descendant of any African slaves, you idiot.

    The Kenyan Obama was not ‘Barack Hussein Obama’s’ biological father. Look up ‘Obama’s real father’, or better, see Wayne Madsen’s work on the topic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    Would love to see a link to the Madsen piece you reference.
    Thanks.
  85. @Wizard of Oz
    I ask genuinely, though a bit sceptically, if you can back up your statement that several people have gone to gaol for saying that fewer than 6 million Jews were killed. I am not interested in cases where they went to gaol for something else and also happened to deny the 6 million figure.

    Also can you give a brief (or extended) summary of your reasons for saying Norman Finkelstein was "destroyed". I wasn't aware of him having been shut up or discredited.

    I ask genuinely, though a bit sceptically, if you can back up your statement that several people have gone to gaol for saying that fewer than 6 million Jews were killed. I am not interested in cases where they went to gaol for something else and also happened to deny the 6 million figure.

    For a dispassionate summary see the Wikipedia entry on Laws against Holocaust denial, which is defined as “the denial of the systematic genocidal killing of 6 million Jews and people of various ethnic groups in Europe by Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 1940s.” Twenty victims of this legal persecution are listed, with brief summaries of their offenses, including disputing the 6- million number.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_against_Holocaust_denial

    The sacrosanct nature of the 6-million figure is witnessed by the fact that when the death count at Auschwitz was reduced by over 2-million this had no effect on the overall total of 6-million.

    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1992-05-07/news/9202100662_1_death-wall-auschwitz-memorials

    Also can you give a brief (or extended) summary of your reasons for saying Norman Finkelstein was “destroyed”. I wasn’t aware of him having been shut up or discredited.

    I should not have said that Finkelstein was destroyed, since he is still a prolific and important writer, including even here at Unz. His academic career was devastated however. After a series of prestigious academic appointments he was up for tenure at DePaul, when the Holocaust Industry spearheaded by Alan Dershowitz intervened.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Finkelstein#Tenure_denial_and_resignation

    Since that time his academic career has been limited to an obscure school in Turkey as far as I know. To get a good feeling exactly what it’s like to be targeted by these people see the documentary Defamation, which just happened to have interviews with Finkelstein ongoing when the hammer came down.

    Read More
  86. @Wizard of Oz
    I ask genuinely, though a bit sceptically, if you can back up your statement that several people have gone to gaol for saying that fewer than 6 million Jews were killed. I am not interested in cases where they went to gaol for something else and also happened to deny the 6 million figure.

    Also can you give a brief (or extended) summary of your reasons for saying Norman Finkelstein was "destroyed". I wasn't aware of him having been shut up or discredited.

    Perhaps google “Gayssot Act”.

    Read More
  87. @Wizard of Oz
    I ask genuinely, though a bit sceptically, if you can back up your statement that several people have gone to gaol for saying that fewer than 6 million Jews were killed. I am not interested in cases where they went to gaol for something else and also happened to deny the 6 million figure.

    Also can you give a brief (or extended) summary of your reasons for saying Norman Finkelstein was "destroyed". I wasn't aware of him having been shut up or discredited.

    You could also search for, “people who have gone to jail for holocaust denial”. It is true: google is your friend.

    Read More
  88. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    And that tells the world that the narrative doesn't withstand scrutiny.

    Science, rational thought, & logic simply demolish the 'holocaust' storyline.
    And that's why there are Thought Crime Laws that imprison those who engage in free speech about it.

    Truth is hate to those that hate the truth.

    See the 'holocaust' scam easily & thoroughly debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Hey, here’s an interesting fact. Of all the immigrant groups in the United States, the group with the highest percentage holding PhDs is Nigerians — 4% of them have doctorates. That’s in addition to their very high percentages holding bachelor’s and master’s degrees. Also, many Nigerian immigrants send their children back to Nigeria for boarding school before college.

    And Nigerians aren’t alone in doing well academically or economically among African immigrants. Immigrants from Ghana, Malawi, Botswana, and Kenya all do pretty well when coming here. Interestingly, among engineers who are black, the clear majority are of recent African ancestry rather than African American — again, Nigerians form the largest percentage.

    Now, you make a good point — look at the countries they come from. None of the countries listed above are particularly nice. Presumably, you’d say the same thing about an immigrant from Belfast, or Belgrade? People immigrate in part because they want to leave terrible places. That’s hardly a surprise.

    But the other point to note about the countries sending the most successful immigrants from Africa to the U.S. is this: They all have very large natural resources, they all have enjoyed relative political stability, and they all have English as an official language, so if you come from the middle class in one of these countries and attend a high school, it’s likely that you speak fluent English.

    So here’s the rub: African American by and large come from the same part of Africa as Nigerians and Ghanains, particularly the latter (Malawi and Botswana are in southern Africa; Kenya is east central). So why don’t American blacks do as well as Nigerians and Ghanaians? Because it would seem to me that genetics is going to fail as an explanation. Wanna give it a try?

    Read More
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    OK--here goes...
    It is no secret that most African slaves who were shipped to the "New World" were not the "best and brightest", but were the unfortunate "dregs" of their respective African societies. You see, the African chieftains sold off their low-IQ, dull-witted morons, slackers and troublemakers, as well as their conquests of the various internecine wars that have been going on for centuries.
    We are the recipients of the ancestors of these "dregs"... as they are responsible for most of our racial problems, to this day...
    , @Wally
    More fake numbers from a Zionist.
    , @Priss Factor
    What would happen to those black Africans in the US if they weren't showered with Affirmative Action that was meant for American Blacks?

    And why aren't they using their talents to fix their own much troubled nations? Why did they leave behind their own kind to live in the West?
  89. anarchyst says:
    @Anon
    Hey, here's an interesting fact. Of all the immigrant groups in the United States, the group with the highest percentage holding PhDs is Nigerians -- 4% of them have doctorates. That's in addition to their very high percentages holding bachelor's and master's degrees. Also, many Nigerian immigrants send their children back to Nigeria for boarding school before college.

    And Nigerians aren't alone in doing well academically or economically among African immigrants. Immigrants from Ghana, Malawi, Botswana, and Kenya all do pretty well when coming here. Interestingly, among engineers who are black, the clear majority are of recent African ancestry rather than African American -- again, Nigerians form the largest percentage.

    Now, you make a good point -- look at the countries they come from. None of the countries listed above are particularly nice. Presumably, you'd say the same thing about an immigrant from Belfast, or Belgrade? People immigrate in part because they want to leave terrible places. That's hardly a surprise.

    But the other point to note about the countries sending the most successful immigrants from Africa to the U.S. is this: They all have very large natural resources, they all have enjoyed relative political stability, and they all have English as an official language, so if you come from the middle class in one of these countries and attend a high school, it's likely that you speak fluent English.

    So here's the rub: African American by and large come from the same part of Africa as Nigerians and Ghanains, particularly the latter (Malawi and Botswana are in southern Africa; Kenya is east central). So why don't American blacks do as well as Nigerians and Ghanaians? Because it would seem to me that genetics is going to fail as an explanation. Wanna give it a try?

    OK–here goes…
    It is no secret that most African slaves who were shipped to the “New World” were not the “best and brightest”, but were the unfortunate “dregs” of their respective African societies. You see, the African chieftains sold off their low-IQ, dull-witted morons, slackers and troublemakers, as well as their conquests of the various internecine wars that have been going on for centuries.
    We are the recipients of the ancestors of these “dregs”… as they are responsible for most of our racial problems, to this day…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha

    You see, the African chieftains sold off their low-IQ, dull-witted morons, slackers and troublemakers
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyer%27s_remorse

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7b/df/ed/7bdfeddf1ece7cdfb6d8ba281b8f12bb.jpg

    , @Anon
    So then here's the next part of the problem. Afro-Caribbeans are also descended from slaves, who presumably would be drawn from these putatively low IQ people. Now certainly there is low achievement among some of the populations, notably Haitians. However, most of the populations who became free under the British do much better -- again particularly when they immigrate to the U.S. Brooklyn and Queens are full of high-achieving Afro-Caribbean populations who are genetically indistinguishable from African Americans, with one distinction, i.e., African Americans have more European ancestry than most Afro-Caribbeans. Now genetics tells us that heterozygosity endows several genetic advantages, so I'm not prepared to say that African Americans having low IQs is a matter of a higher rate of whites raping blacks during slavery. But the people here seem to be the experts, so you guys tell me.
  90. anarchyst says:
    @jacques sheete

    There is much contention as to whether even a single jew was killed in a gas chamber.
     
    Not only is there much contention, but there is no credible evidence that it really happened. Besides, the numbers are farcical.

    Where do they get 6 million?

    “Allowing for a maximum of 100,000 who succeeded in emigrating from Europe, this would bring the total number of Jews under the direct rule of Nazi Germany to about 3,200,000.”

    Distribution of the Jewish Population of Europe 1933-. 1940," prepared by Mr. Moses Moskowitz
    AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK 1941-1942, page 662

    http://www.ajcarchives.org/AJC_DATA/Files/1941_1942_9_Statistics.pdf
     
    I haven't checked in a while, but I wonder if the link is still active...

    …there were MORE “holocaust ™” survivors immediately AFTER WW2 than there were populating all of Europe and Palestine at the time.
    You see, anyone who claims jewish ancestry is automatically a “holocaust ™” survivor…

    Read More
    • Replies: @b4real
    Are you familiar with Mark Twains' tale of puddinhead wilson? There might be a clue or two in it for you.

    b4real
  91. Talha says:
    @anarchyst
    OK--here goes...
    It is no secret that most African slaves who were shipped to the "New World" were not the "best and brightest", but were the unfortunate "dregs" of their respective African societies. You see, the African chieftains sold off their low-IQ, dull-witted morons, slackers and troublemakers, as well as their conquests of the various internecine wars that have been going on for centuries.
    We are the recipients of the ancestors of these "dregs"... as they are responsible for most of our racial problems, to this day...

    You see, the African chieftains sold off their low-IQ, dull-witted morons, slackers and troublemakers

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyer%27s_remorse

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    So whites were really the victims here (of unscrupulous black slave salesmen)?

    :)
  92. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Talha

    You see, the African chieftains sold off their low-IQ, dull-witted morons, slackers and troublemakers
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyer%27s_remorse

    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7b/df/ed/7bdfeddf1ece7cdfb6d8ba281b8f12bb.jpg

    So whites were really the victims here (of unscrupulous black slave salesmen)?

    :)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    I'm just saying - you buy it, you own it. Don't come whining 4 centuries after the fact.

    Peace.
    , @Talha
    One has to ask; were they in the market for intelligent slaves to do book keeping or governance or were they looking for dull-minded, strong ones that could be used for difficult manual labor and not be able to organize revolts or escape?

    If you plan to buy a horse, what breed will you get? What temperament do you want? Well it depends; do you want a war horse, a race horse or one to till the fields or lug heavy wagons. You can't buy a draft-horse and complain it doesn't run fast - that's just silly.

    Ottomans procured plenty of Black (and other) slaves and many of them reached high positions that required intelligence and skills:
    "But much more mystifying is the honor accorded to senior eunuchs. Many were among those governors and generals, and under the Ottomans, one black eunuch was chief administrator of Mecca and Medina. In the late 19th century, an observer noticed that 'when any eunuch . . . enters one of the tramcars in Stamboul, all the Turks who may happen to be in the vehicle immediately rise, salaam profoundly and remain standing till the great man has chosen a seat.'"
    http://www.nytimes.com/books/01/03/04/reviews/010304.04hochsct.html?mcubz=0&mcubz=0

    You get what you pay for.

    Peace.
  93. There is only effective way defuse the explosive potential of minorities:
    1.Educate minorities and explain to them that they are being manipulated
    2.Educate those joining anti-minority movements that they are also being manipulated
    3.Offer the minorities a future based on equality and reconciliation
    4.Put the spotlight on those who fan the flames of conflict and try to turn minorities and majorities against each other

    Rottsa Ruck. You’ll be fighting fallen human nature, and that’s what has gotten us to this pass in the first place.

    Read More
  94. @Pilger
    Bragadocious, I am not sure what the Saker knows about Holodomor, but I do know a thing or two about it, especially as my own grandparents have been affected by it.

    So let me clarify a few points. Holodomor was not perpetrated by Russia against Ukraine. It was perpetrated by the Stalinist Communist government of the USSR against all peasants of the USSR. It did not affect only Ukraine, it affected all the Soviet countryside - Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc., etc., etc. (Stalin, by the way, was not an ethnic Russian, he was a Georgian, his real name was Jugashvili).

    It was a famine caused by the collectivisation - forced unification of private peasant households into collective farms, in the course of which millions of wealthier peasants all over the Soviet Union suffered confiscation of their property and, more often than not, were exiled into the more inhospitable parts of the country were they lived and often died in absolutely conditions. Some were arrested and killed. As a result, the Soviet agricultural output plummeted and large numbers of people died of hunger, while others suffered severe food shortages.

    Ukrainians have no privilege of suffering. They just complain more loudly than others.

    As for modern Ukraine, it has developed in an ultranationalist State where the nationalistic majority is persecuting the Russian-speaking minority. There is also a lot of anti-Semitism (not surprising, as modern Ukraine has proclaimed the notorious nazi butcher Bandera its national hero). Some other minorities, like ethnic Hungarians are not feeling comfortable in modern Ukraine either. But the Ukrainian regime is trying (rather clumsily) to instrumentalise Crimean Tartars in their struggle against Russia.

    If you need an example of a majority oppressing a minority, look at Ukraine. It is a good one.

    Thanks for that wall of text. Doesn’t change a thing. It was a form of extermination, committed by Russia, as the USSR was centered in Russia. Stalin’s place of birth has fuck all to do with anything. You’re trying to employ some fancy footwork to exonerate Russia for reasons I can only guess at, but it won’t work. Saker’s still a left-wing Euro tool.

    Read More
  95. Talha says:
    @Anon
    So whites were really the victims here (of unscrupulous black slave salesmen)?

    :)

    I’m just saying – you buy it, you own it. Don’t come whining 4 centuries after the fact.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    But if my grandfather bought an atom bomb the salesman told him was a radio, can I recover from the company?

    Of course in Africa the companies are out of business, and thus probably not taking returns.
  96. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Talha
    I'm just saying - you buy it, you own it. Don't come whining 4 centuries after the fact.

    Peace.

    But if my grandfather bought an atom bomb the salesman told him was a radio, can I recover from the company?

    Of course in Africa the companies are out of business, and thus probably not taking returns.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Talha
    Yeah but this is totally not analogous - they saw and examined the slaves at the slave markets before shipping them. First off, you needed strong, healthy ones to survive the Middle Passage. They were looking for strong slaves that wouldn't cause much trouble. Nobody ripped them off - it's not like some guy sold them a lot of 50 slaves and like 20 of them were cripples. Now they have buyer's remorse because they have less need for plantation slaves - they need office slaves.

    and thus probably not taking returns
     
    Well, the item is not in original condition and packaging now is it?

    Peace.
  97. Talha says:
    @Anon
    So whites were really the victims here (of unscrupulous black slave salesmen)?

    :)

    One has to ask; were they in the market for intelligent slaves to do book keeping or governance or were they looking for dull-minded, strong ones that could be used for difficult manual labor and not be able to organize revolts or escape?

    If you plan to buy a horse, what breed will you get? What temperament do you want? Well it depends; do you want a war horse, a race horse or one to till the fields or lug heavy wagons. You can’t buy a draft-horse and complain it doesn’t run fast – that’s just silly.

    Ottomans procured plenty of Black (and other) slaves and many of them reached high positions that required intelligence and skills:
    “But much more mystifying is the honor accorded to senior eunuchs. Many were among those governors and generals, and under the Ottomans, one black eunuch was chief administrator of Mecca and Medina. In the late 19th century, an observer noticed that ‘when any eunuch . . . enters one of the tramcars in Stamboul, all the Turks who may happen to be in the vehicle immediately rise, salaam profoundly and remain standing till the great man has chosen a seat.’”

    http://www.nytimes.com/books/01/03/04/reviews/010304.04hochsct.html?mcubz=0&mcubz=0

    You get what you pay for.

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Well, that's a more serious discussion than I was attempting to have. And in all fairness I should probably post something more than the joke which follows:

    The Ottomans (at least Muhammad Ali*) developed an interesting solution to slave problems in 1805, which they occasionally applied thereafter.

    *Before he took up boxing.

    ... but I don't really have anything serious to say on the topic.
  98. Talha says:
    @Anon
    But if my grandfather bought an atom bomb the salesman told him was a radio, can I recover from the company?

    Of course in Africa the companies are out of business, and thus probably not taking returns.

    Yeah but this is totally not analogous – they saw and examined the slaves at the slave markets before shipping them. First off, you needed strong, healthy ones to survive the Middle Passage. They were looking for strong slaves that wouldn’t cause much trouble. Nobody ripped them off – it’s not like some guy sold them a lot of 50 slaves and like 20 of them were cripples. Now they have buyer’s remorse because they have less need for plantation slaves – they need office slaves.

    and thus probably not taking returns

    Well, the item is not in original condition and packaging now is it?

    Peace.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Darn, I was hoping you'd say human beings weren't atom bombs, since then I'd have this great link: http://www.qissa-khwani.com/2013/03/haseena-atom-bomb.html .
  99. Minorities are not really educable. That has been tried for decades, and it has failed spectacularly. They are generally low-IQ, nonWhite savages. All they care about is being told how precious they are and being given free money/goods.

    The only solution to the minority problem in historically White countries is to eject the nonWhites; summarily and entirely. Whites have the means to do this, but what the immediate future holds is a civil war between Leftist Whites and their third-world-savage foot soldiers, and awakened Whites who reject Leftist lies and who understand that they have every right in the world to their hard-won territories.

    This will not be pretty or pleasant, but it is the best-case scenario.
    In any case, it’s been building for decades. Nothing can stop it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    The only solution to the minority problem in historically White countries is to eject the nonWhites; summarily and entirely. Whites have the means to do this, but what the immediate future holds is a civil war between Leftist Whites and their third-world-savage foot soldiers, and awakened Whites who reject Leftist lies and who understand that they have every right in the world to their hard-won territories.

    This will not be pretty or pleasant, but it is the best-case scenario.
    In any case, it’s been building for decades. Nothing can stop it.
     
    Agree.
    But....it appears that alt-right in general isn't comfortable entertaining that idea.
    Smells of.....that magical word "violence" which is frown upon by erudite Internet thinkers.
    And, probably, could shut down this Website as well.
    Enticing violence.

    So, people can talk all they want about everything except real solution.

    Funny a?
  100. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Talha
    One has to ask; were they in the market for intelligent slaves to do book keeping or governance or were they looking for dull-minded, strong ones that could be used for difficult manual labor and not be able to organize revolts or escape?

    If you plan to buy a horse, what breed will you get? What temperament do you want? Well it depends; do you want a war horse, a race horse or one to till the fields or lug heavy wagons. You can't buy a draft-horse and complain it doesn't run fast - that's just silly.

    Ottomans procured plenty of Black (and other) slaves and many of them reached high positions that required intelligence and skills:
    "But much more mystifying is the honor accorded to senior eunuchs. Many were among those governors and generals, and under the Ottomans, one black eunuch was chief administrator of Mecca and Medina. In the late 19th century, an observer noticed that 'when any eunuch . . . enters one of the tramcars in Stamboul, all the Turks who may happen to be in the vehicle immediately rise, salaam profoundly and remain standing till the great man has chosen a seat.'"
    http://www.nytimes.com/books/01/03/04/reviews/010304.04hochsct.html?mcubz=0&mcubz=0

    You get what you pay for.

    Peace.

    Well, that’s a more serious discussion than I was attempting to have. And in all fairness I should probably post something more than the joke which follows:

    The Ottomans (at least Muhammad Ali*) developed an interesting solution to slave problems in 1805, which they occasionally applied thereafter.

    *Before he took up boxing.

    … but I don’t really have anything serious to say on the topic.

    Read More
  101. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Talha
    Yeah but this is totally not analogous - they saw and examined the slaves at the slave markets before shipping them. First off, you needed strong, healthy ones to survive the Middle Passage. They were looking for strong slaves that wouldn't cause much trouble. Nobody ripped them off - it's not like some guy sold them a lot of 50 slaves and like 20 of them were cripples. Now they have buyer's remorse because they have less need for plantation slaves - they need office slaves.

    and thus probably not taking returns
     
    Well, the item is not in original condition and packaging now is it?

    Peace.

    Darn, I was hoping you’d say human beings weren’t atom bombs, since then I’d have this great link: http://www.qissa-khwani.com/2013/03/haseena-atom-bomb.html .

    Read More
  102. @Wizard of Oz
    Can magic thinking get rid of the First Amendment as you propose?

    Seeing as that amendment has already been stomped on so many times in the last 2 decades, im not sure why you think it would be a problem.

    Especially seeing as how the major news outlets are starting a civil war by fanning the race flame. They lie regulary, and ommit facts that contradict their lies.

    The left has been shutting down free speech, freedom of press, and the right to assemble. Examples: talking about how blacks are more likely to rob and kill, hate speech, you can lose everything for it. The major media networks pushed the “fake news” story and blacklisted how many sites?
    Everytime peaceful americans get together legally to oppose the powers that be and defend the first amendment, who shows up?

    Read More
  103. peterAUS says:
    @Fisk Ellington Rutledge IV
    Minorities are not really educable. That has been tried for decades, and it has failed spectacularly. They are generally low-IQ, nonWhite savages. All they care about is being told how precious they are and being given free money/goods.

    The only solution to the minority problem in historically White countries is to eject the nonWhites; summarily and entirely. Whites have the means to do this, but what the immediate future holds is a civil war between Leftist Whites and their third-world-savage foot soldiers, and awakened Whites who reject Leftist lies and who understand that they have every right in the world to their hard-won territories.

    This will not be pretty or pleasant, but it is the best-case scenario.
    In any case, it's been building for decades. Nothing can stop it.

    The only solution to the minority problem in historically White countries is to eject the nonWhites; summarily and entirely. Whites have the means to do this, but what the immediate future holds is a civil war between Leftist Whites and their third-world-savage foot soldiers, and awakened Whites who reject Leftist lies and who understand that they have every right in the world to their hard-won territories.

    This will not be pretty or pleasant, but it is the best-case scenario.
    In any case, it’s been building for decades. Nothing can stop it.

    Agree.
    But….it appears that alt-right in general isn’t comfortable entertaining that idea.
    Smells of…..that magical word “violence” which is frown upon by erudite Internet thinkers.
    And, probably, could shut down this Website as well.
    Enticing violence.

    So, people can talk all they want about everything except real solution.

    Funny a?

    Read More
  104. A real jackpot. BAMMAMA and ACOWW in single incident.

    1. Blacks Are More Muscular and More Aggressive

    2. Afro-Colonization of White Wombs

    Diversity sure is vibrant.

    Read More
  105. I have follow this Saker guy for a while, and what is evident is that he is another moron, “I’m proud Russian but love the US.” type of dumb-ass who has no sense of history and reality.

    “Minorities often have a deep-seated inferiority complex towards the putatively more successful majority.”

    The statement above says it all. Inferiority complex, really. Tell that to the Iraqis, Libyans, The entire indigenous Aboriginals, Americans, and the Africans–who have been exterminated, subverted, and destroyed for centuries and still now…by the so-called “…more successful majority.” This Saker guy is a racist to the core. After reading his childish rants about his beloved Russia being victim to the so-called AngloZionist, for what we may ask? Geo-politics. But he never fails to rail against the people under the western oppression, overt and covert. The US he now calls home, while preaching about being a proud Russia was built with blood and death, this fact goes un-noticed. This guy is am imbecile, a low level intellect pretending to be smart. A real intellect will use analysis of historical fact because writing this garbage. Everything you’re enjoying in was built by blood, and you will pay the price. Karma.

    What’s happening to western civilization is their own doing. You speak about Americans in the Ukraine and Russia is the victim, yeah right, what about Europe and America in Africa, Asia, and the America for 450 years of nothing but death and destruction. What about that? The Saker is Anti-semite, and a racist. The hatred of Jews is the driving logic, not the humanity.

    If anyone want to read a great Russian, a man of conviction who writes about the crimes of western man that guys like the Saker always omit, read Andre Vitchek. Now, this is a write that love humanity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sowhat
    Thanks for the advice. I'm ALWAYS looking for a "second opinion and bookmarked the site for addition reading. Are you Jewish? Lol I don't really care. Blessings or cursings of follow.
    , @peterAUS
    An excellent post.
    Nice to see that hatred and desire for a payback.

    Keyword...PAYBACK.

    That's the thing that...khm...educated...... Westerners just don't get.
    "If we only right our past treatments of other peoples all will be fine and we all will live happily".

    Well...how about "if we keep helping those peoples getting more and more power one day they'll rule over us and then we are F*^&ED"?

    But, hopefully, more sentiments like this made public, more Westerners will, hopefully, come to their senses.

    Hopefully.

    Keep up the good work, please.
    Looking forward to more of the same.

    , @Anonymous
    So, your argument is that the white race should be hated and punished for its historical sins.

    All the more reason for us whites to wake up and expel every last Jew and shitskin from our lands. This will get ugly and you're not going to like the outcome.
  106. @Intelligent Dasein
    Barack Obama was not the descendant of any African slaves, you idiot.

    He didn’t say he was. Re-read his comment, see if you can find the real error that’s there.

    Read More
  107. This is how State Terror works in the 21st century.

    In the past, the state used government goons to attack political enemies and repress opposition and dissidents.

    In American democracy, as well in EU, state uses a different kind of terror.
    Instead of ordering state goons to attack the people, it orders state goons NOT to protect the people.

    So, who attacks the people? The new breed of ‘Red Guards’ indoctrinated with PC by public education, Hollywood, and anarcho-music scene.

    The state doesn’t need its own hired goons to suppress the voice of the people since so many of the people themselves have been brainwashed to hate and attack patriots. So many young people are vapid and empty and looking for some big meaning in life, and the establishment fooled them into thinking there are lots of nazis to hunt.

    So, with Antifanissary goons(members of civilian population) attacking and suppressing patriots, the ONLY thing the tyrannical state has to do is order the police and other lawmen to ‘stand down’ and do NOTHING to protect people from thug violence.
    That way, the state keeps its hands ‘clean’ since it didn’t order anyone to attack anyone. It just told the police to do nothing. Such neglect of duty may be construed as ‘criminal’, but the state argues that it is allowing ‘freedom of speech and expression’ for leftist dissidents, like it did for BLM.

    As for the media(dominated by Jewish globalists), the antifa thug violence is either unreported or spun as ‘fighting nazis’.

    This is what globalist-minority supremacism looks like.

    What’s truly weird is that the violence isn’t even directed as dissidents or radicals but bona fide American patriots who believe in red, white, and blue.
    The victims are not radical dissidents but normal Americans.

    But this may backfire on the Lib Establishment, just like BLM did. BLM madness just made the cops to ‘stand down’ and step back, and then cities got more violent.

    Once these Antifanissary thugs run out of ‘nazis’ to punch and beat up, they will turn their anger on something else. And as they all mill around Libby areas, they will make life most difficult for libby yuppie types…as in Seattle.

    Read More
  108. Wally says:
    @Anon
    Hey, here's an interesting fact. Of all the immigrant groups in the United States, the group with the highest percentage holding PhDs is Nigerians -- 4% of them have doctorates. That's in addition to their very high percentages holding bachelor's and master's degrees. Also, many Nigerian immigrants send their children back to Nigeria for boarding school before college.

    And Nigerians aren't alone in doing well academically or economically among African immigrants. Immigrants from Ghana, Malawi, Botswana, and Kenya all do pretty well when coming here. Interestingly, among engineers who are black, the clear majority are of recent African ancestry rather than African American -- again, Nigerians form the largest percentage.

    Now, you make a good point -- look at the countries they come from. None of the countries listed above are particularly nice. Presumably, you'd say the same thing about an immigrant from Belfast, or Belgrade? People immigrate in part because they want to leave terrible places. That's hardly a surprise.

    But the other point to note about the countries sending the most successful immigrants from Africa to the U.S. is this: They all have very large natural resources, they all have enjoyed relative political stability, and they all have English as an official language, so if you come from the middle class in one of these countries and attend a high school, it's likely that you speak fluent English.

    So here's the rub: African American by and large come from the same part of Africa as Nigerians and Ghanains, particularly the latter (Malawi and Botswana are in southern Africa; Kenya is east central). So why don't American blacks do as well as Nigerians and Ghanaians? Because it would seem to me that genetics is going to fail as an explanation. Wanna give it a try?

    More fake numbers from a Zionist.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Are you serious? Is that the best you can do?
  109. Sowhat says:
    @The Saker is DUMB
    I have follow this Saker guy for a while, and what is evident is that he is another moron, "I'm proud Russian but love the US." type of dumb-ass who has no sense of history and reality.

    "Minorities often have a deep-seated inferiority complex towards the putatively more successful majority."

    The statement above says it all. Inferiority complex, really. Tell that to the Iraqis, Libyans, The entire indigenous Aboriginals, Americans, and the Africans--who have been exterminated, subverted, and destroyed for centuries and still now...by the so-called "...more successful majority." This Saker guy is a racist to the core. After reading his childish rants about his beloved Russia being victim to the so-called AngloZionist, for what we may ask? Geo-politics. But he never fails to rail against the people under the western oppression, overt and covert. The US he now calls home, while preaching about being a proud Russia was built with blood and death, this fact goes un-noticed. This guy is am imbecile, a low level intellect pretending to be smart. A real intellect will use analysis of historical fact because writing this garbage. Everything you're enjoying in was built by blood, and you will pay the price. Karma.

    What's happening to western civilization is their own doing. You speak about Americans in the Ukraine and Russia is the victim, yeah right, what about Europe and America in Africa, Asia, and the America for 450 years of nothing but death and destruction. What about that? The Saker is Anti-semite, and a racist. The hatred of Jews is the driving logic, not the humanity.

    If anyone want to read a great Russian, a man of conviction who writes about the crimes of western man that guys like the Saker always omit, read Andre Vitchek. Now, this is a write that love humanity.

    Thanks for the advice. I’m ALWAYS looking for a “second opinion and bookmarked the site for addition reading. Are you Jewish? Lol I don’t really care. Blessings or cursings of follow.

    Read More
  110. Ace says:

    ** Educate minorities . . . **

    A pleasant fantasy but the shoal upon which Mr. Saker’s plan will go aground. “Minorities” in Russia are not the same as “minorities” in the U.S.

    Empty EBT card accounts will be educational but that’s a ways down the pike.

    Read More
  111. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    More fake numbers from a Zionist.

    Are you serious? Is that the best you can do?

    Read More
  112. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @anarchyst
    OK--here goes...
    It is no secret that most African slaves who were shipped to the "New World" were not the "best and brightest", but were the unfortunate "dregs" of their respective African societies. You see, the African chieftains sold off their low-IQ, dull-witted morons, slackers and troublemakers, as well as their conquests of the various internecine wars that have been going on for centuries.
    We are the recipients of the ancestors of these "dregs"... as they are responsible for most of our racial problems, to this day...

    So then here’s the next part of the problem. Afro-Caribbeans are also descended from slaves, who presumably would be drawn from these putatively low IQ people. Now certainly there is low achievement among some of the populations, notably Haitians. However, most of the populations who became free under the British do much better — again particularly when they immigrate to the U.S. Brooklyn and Queens are full of high-achieving Afro-Caribbean populations who are genetically indistinguishable from African Americans, with one distinction, i.e., African Americans have more European ancestry than most Afro-Caribbeans. Now genetics tells us that heterozygosity endows several genetic advantages, so I’m not prepared to say that African Americans having low IQs is a matter of a higher rate of whites raping blacks during slavery. But the people here seem to be the experts, so you guys tell me.

    Read More
  113. peterAUS says:
    @The Saker is DUMB
    I have follow this Saker guy for a while, and what is evident is that he is another moron, "I'm proud Russian but love the US." type of dumb-ass who has no sense of history and reality.

    "Minorities often have a deep-seated inferiority complex towards the putatively more successful majority."

    The statement above says it all. Inferiority complex, really. Tell that to the Iraqis, Libyans, The entire indigenous Aboriginals, Americans, and the Africans--who have been exterminated, subverted, and destroyed for centuries and still now...by the so-called "...more successful majority." This Saker guy is a racist to the core. After reading his childish rants about his beloved Russia being victim to the so-called AngloZionist, for what we may ask? Geo-politics. But he never fails to rail against the people under the western oppression, overt and covert. The US he now calls home, while preaching about being a proud Russia was built with blood and death, this fact goes un-noticed. This guy is am imbecile, a low level intellect pretending to be smart. A real intellect will use analysis of historical fact because writing this garbage. Everything you're enjoying in was built by blood, and you will pay the price. Karma.

    What's happening to western civilization is their own doing. You speak about Americans in the Ukraine and Russia is the victim, yeah right, what about Europe and America in Africa, Asia, and the America for 450 years of nothing but death and destruction. What about that? The Saker is Anti-semite, and a racist. The hatred of Jews is the driving logic, not the humanity.

    If anyone want to read a great Russian, a man of conviction who writes about the crimes of western man that guys like the Saker always omit, read Andre Vitchek. Now, this is a write that love humanity.

    An excellent post.
    Nice to see that hatred and desire for a payback.

    Keyword…PAYBACK.

    That’s the thing that…khm…educated…… Westerners just don’t get.
    “If we only right our past treatments of other peoples all will be fine and we all will live happily”.

    Well…how about “if we keep helping those peoples getting more and more power one day they’ll rule over us and then we are F*^&ED”?

    But, hopefully, more sentiments like this made public, more Westerners will, hopefully, come to their senses.

    Hopefully.

    Keep up the good work, please.
    Looking forward to more of the same.

    Read More
  114. @WorkingClass
    What do all races, genders, nationalities and creeds have in common? An overwhelming majority of them are working class. That's why I am white and Nationalist but not a White Nationalist. The working class wants work and wages. The ruling class gives us war and welfare. Solidarity is the only effective defense against concentrated wealth. Absent solidarity the working class is a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. Witness the American prole. Simultaneously under the lash and at each others throats.

    Why don’t they understand that if we give them what they think they want, we’ll turn into the country they escaped from ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Well...probably for the same reason majority of native people thinks the same.
    Or, better, doesn't think.
    Hasn't "I feel" replaced "I think"?
    I wonder....NOT.....how many.....educated... people are aware of "Cogito ergo sum".

    As for thinking minority of those minorities (pun intended), well, they know exactly what they want.
    Like..."Better to be first among roosters than last among bulls".
    Or....better to rule in, say, Nigeria....then to be a part of Western precariat.

    Simple.

  115. Skeptikal says:
    @sarz
    The Kenyan Obama was not 'Barack Hussein Obama's' biological father. Look up 'Obama's real father', or better, see Wayne Madsen's work on the topic.

    Would love to see a link to the Madsen piece you reference.
    Thanks.

    Read More
  116. peterAUS says:
    @boogerbently
    Why don't they understand that if we give them what they think they want, we'll turn into the country they escaped from ?

    Well…probably for the same reason majority of native people thinks the same.
    Or, better, doesn’t think.
    Hasn’t “I feel” replaced “I think”?
    I wonder….NOT…..how many…..educated… people are aware of “Cogito ergo sum”.

    As for thinking minority of those minorities (pun intended), well, they know exactly what they want.
    Like…”Better to be first among roosters than last among bulls”.
    Or….better to rule in, say, Nigeria….then to be a part of Western precariat.

    Simple.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sarah Toga

    Hasn’t “I feel” replaced “I think”?
    I wonder….NOT…..how many…..educated… people are aware of “Cogito ergo sum”.
     
    Check out a book titled: Credentialed To Destroy.
    And a website: InvisibleSerfsCollar dot com.
    The education "blob" is one of our worst enemies.
  117. @Bragadocious
    Could it be out of a deep sense of guilt of having committed the only “pan-genocide” in human history


    I guess Saker's never heard of the Ukranian Holodomor, perpetrated by his beloved Russia. And what were Spain, Portugal and Britain up to in the New World? This guy's a left-wing Euro clown.

    Could it be out of a deep sense of guilt of having committed the only “pan-genocide” in human history (the genocide of all the ethnic groups of an entire continent)?

    Another thought – while probably not intended to this end, the “Indian Reservations” effectively preserved a fair number of full-blood “Native Americans.” Preserved them as tribes. Today, they are re-grouping. Not so many full-bloods these days. But enough who identify as whatever Tribe instead as White, regardless of the small quantum of tribal blood.

    Unfair, rough treatment? Yes. And the SCOTUS of the day declared some of those actions unconstitutional. But hardly a genocide.
    I do see Saker’s intro point as a preface to his main points.

    Read More
  118. while we are taught that democracies should uphold the right of the minorities, the opposite is true: real democracies should strive to protect majorities against the abuse of power from minorities!

    Agreeance!

    However . . . Brown v. Board of Education put an end to that.
    Majority rule abolished.

    The so-called civil rights acts of the 1960′s in tandem with the 1965 immigration law and its millions of imported new “minorities” to exploit the moved goal posts on the newly-tilted playing field added fuel to the fire.

    Quite a brilliant set-up by the anti-White, anti-America forces. Historic America has yet to even begin to think up a response.

    Read More
  119. KenH says:

    Manipulated minorities? This suggests non-white/third world minorities are in no way responsible for how they behave and that they just putty in the hands of the (((elites))). Most of these minorities are intensely racially and ethnically, or in the case of Muslims, religiously conscious and are naturally hostile to groups unlike themselves. It doesn’t take very much to inflame their passions and their hatreds of whitey.

    An educational effort and quarterly roundtable discussions between the majority and hostile minorities isn’t the answer either as it would just devolve into a shouting match and finger pointing. If this is all the Saker can come up with then I’m disappointed as he can do better than that.

    Partition along racial, ethnic and ideological lines is the only thing that will bring peace to this hapless land called America. Dumping disparate racial, ethic and religious groups into formerly white living spaces and forcing everyone to live together is tyranny of the worst kind.

    Read More
  120. @peterAUS
    Well...probably for the same reason majority of native people thinks the same.
    Or, better, doesn't think.
    Hasn't "I feel" replaced "I think"?
    I wonder....NOT.....how many.....educated... people are aware of "Cogito ergo sum".

    As for thinking minority of those minorities (pun intended), well, they know exactly what they want.
    Like..."Better to be first among roosters than last among bulls".
    Or....better to rule in, say, Nigeria....then to be a part of Western precariat.

    Simple.

    Hasn’t “I feel” replaced “I think”?
    I wonder….NOT…..how many…..educated… people are aware of “Cogito ergo sum”.

    Check out a book titled: Credentialed To Destroy.
    And a website: InvisibleSerfsCollar dot com.
    The education “blob” is one of our worst enemies.

    Read More
  121. AP says:
    @Pilger
    Bragadocious, I am not sure what the Saker knows about Holodomor, but I do know a thing or two about it, especially as my own grandparents have been affected by it.

    So let me clarify a few points. Holodomor was not perpetrated by Russia against Ukraine. It was perpetrated by the Stalinist Communist government of the USSR against all peasants of the USSR. It did not affect only Ukraine, it affected all the Soviet countryside - Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc., etc., etc. (Stalin, by the way, was not an ethnic Russian, he was a Georgian, his real name was Jugashvili).

    It was a famine caused by the collectivisation - forced unification of private peasant households into collective farms, in the course of which millions of wealthier peasants all over the Soviet Union suffered confiscation of their property and, more often than not, were exiled into the more inhospitable parts of the country were they lived and often died in absolutely conditions. Some were arrested and killed. As a result, the Soviet agricultural output plummeted and large numbers of people died of hunger, while others suffered severe food shortages.

    Ukrainians have no privilege of suffering. They just complain more loudly than others.

    As for modern Ukraine, it has developed in an ultranationalist State where the nationalistic majority is persecuting the Russian-speaking minority. There is also a lot of anti-Semitism (not surprising, as modern Ukraine has proclaimed the notorious nazi butcher Bandera its national hero). Some other minorities, like ethnic Hungarians are not feeling comfortable in modern Ukraine either. But the Ukrainian regime is trying (rather clumsily) to instrumentalise Crimean Tartars in their struggle against Russia.

    If you need an example of a majority oppressing a minority, look at Ukraine. It is a good one.

    Ukrainians have no privilege of suffering. They just complain more loudly than others.

    Ukrainians were starved at a higher rate than other ethnicities within Ukraine and throughout the USSR. Ukrainians were about 1/3 the Soviet population but about 1/2 the starvation victims.

    modern Ukraine has proclaimed the notorious nazi butcher Bandera its national hero)

    Bandera was obviously a bad guy, but the Russians building him up as some unheard-of monster is ridiculous. His followers killed up to 100,000 Poles (or as little as 60,000) and around 50,000 Jews within Ukraine. They wanted to cleanse Ukraine of perceived enemies, colonists and occupiers. They weren’t interested in invading anyone, but brutally murdered these non-Ukrainians, women and children among them, in Ukraine (note that Banderists were active in Krakow and Warsaw but unlike Chechens in Moscow they didn’t kill civilians there, they had no problems with Poles being in Poland).

    At the same time Banderists killed up to 100,000-150,000 people in Ukraine, Americans and Brits murdered millions of German and Japanese civilians. Burned them alive through terror bombing, or nuked them (a horrible slow death for those not right under the bomb). Poland had occupied Ukraine and claimed its territory, but what did the Germans do the the Americans? And the of course we can examine Soviet atrocities.

    The same people whining about Bandera in Ukraine, often whine about Lenin statues being pulled down. Before he died, Lenin’s regime murdered millions. Funny, no?

    the nationalistic majority is persecuting the Russian-speaking minority.

    Which is also exaggerated in the Russian media.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    A thought-- why don't you keep Lenin's statues and Bandera's if he has any, but add a plaque describing their crimes?

    Or at least remove any inscriptions praising them.
  122. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @AP

    Ukrainians have no privilege of suffering. They just complain more loudly than others.
     
    Ukrainians were starved at a higher rate than other ethnicities within Ukraine and throughout the USSR. Ukrainians were about 1/3 the Soviet population but about 1/2 the starvation victims.

    modern Ukraine has proclaimed the notorious nazi butcher Bandera its national hero)
     
    Bandera was obviously a bad guy, but the Russians building him up as some unheard-of monster is ridiculous. His followers killed up to 100,000 Poles (or as little as 60,000) and around 50,000 Jews within Ukraine. They wanted to cleanse Ukraine of perceived enemies, colonists and occupiers. They weren't interested in invading anyone, but brutally murdered these non-Ukrainians, women and children among them, in Ukraine (note that Banderists were active in Krakow and Warsaw but unlike Chechens in Moscow they didn't kill civilians there, they had no problems with Poles being in Poland).

    At the same time Banderists killed up to 100,000-150,000 people in Ukraine, Americans and Brits murdered millions of German and Japanese civilians. Burned them alive through terror bombing, or nuked them (a horrible slow death for those not right under the bomb). Poland had occupied Ukraine and claimed its territory, but what did the Germans do the the Americans? And the of course we can examine Soviet atrocities.

    The same people whining about Bandera in Ukraine, often whine about Lenin statues being pulled down. Before he died, Lenin's regime murdered millions. Funny, no?


    the nationalistic majority is persecuting the Russian-speaking minority.
     
    Which is also exaggerated in the Russian media.

    A thought– why don’t you keep Lenin’s statues and Bandera’s if he has any, but add a plaque describing their crimes?

    Or at least remove any inscriptions praising them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AP
    Unlike Robert E Lee in the South, Lenin statues were placed in Ukraine and throughout Eastern Europe by an occupying force, often obnoxiously in the center town, against locals' wishes from the very beginning. This isn't true of every single Lenin statue (there was a lot of commie support in Kharkiv, for example) but true of most of them.
  123. AP says:
    @Anon
    A thought-- why don't you keep Lenin's statues and Bandera's if he has any, but add a plaque describing their crimes?

    Or at least remove any inscriptions praising them.

    Unlike Robert E Lee in the South, Lenin statues were placed in Ukraine and throughout Eastern Europe by an occupying force, often obnoxiously in the center town, against locals’ wishes from the very beginning. This isn’t true of every single Lenin statue (there was a lot of commie support in Kharkiv, for example) but true of most of them.

    Read More
  124. Texan1 says:
    @yeah
    Minorities are nothing but trouble, even though political correctness demands that we not see that or dare to say so. History offers not a single - NOT ONE SINGLE - example of harmony and mutual love between the minorities and the majority in any community/country/nation. Prove me wrong, cite one significant exception.

    Don't cite Italian-Americans and Polish-Americans in the American melting pot. They came with full intent to be melted, they came white, Christian, and western in outlook and culture. They came pre-cooked for the melting pot. Can't say the same for the Muslims streaming in today. Nor for the Hindus and the Orientals coming in today. Leaving aside the Muslims (not even worth discussing in any talk of assimilation), the Hindus and Orientals today stand aside and apart, both groups highly conscious of their groups' share in the American pie. The Hispanics will make Spanish the lingua Franca - already largely done in California. So what exactly can the melting of Spanish and English languages produce? Spanglish? No, it will be one or the other, depending on which group acquires demographic majority and sufficient political clout. Who will melt whom?

    “The Hispanics will make Spanish the lingua Franca – already largely done in California.”

    Lots of my family don’t know any Spanish.

    Read More
  125. @Anon
    Hey, here's an interesting fact. Of all the immigrant groups in the United States, the group with the highest percentage holding PhDs is Nigerians -- 4% of them have doctorates. That's in addition to their very high percentages holding bachelor's and master's degrees. Also, many Nigerian immigrants send their children back to Nigeria for boarding school before college.

    And Nigerians aren't alone in doing well academically or economically among African immigrants. Immigrants from Ghana, Malawi, Botswana, and Kenya all do pretty well when coming here. Interestingly, among engineers who are black, the clear majority are of recent African ancestry rather than African American -- again, Nigerians form the largest percentage.

    Now, you make a good point -- look at the countries they come from. None of the countries listed above are particularly nice. Presumably, you'd say the same thing about an immigrant from Belfast, or Belgrade? People immigrate in part because they want to leave terrible places. That's hardly a surprise.

    But the other point to note about the countries sending the most successful immigrants from Africa to the U.S. is this: They all have very large natural resources, they all have enjoyed relative political stability, and they all have English as an official language, so if you come from the middle class in one of these countries and attend a high school, it's likely that you speak fluent English.

    So here's the rub: African American by and large come from the same part of Africa as Nigerians and Ghanains, particularly the latter (Malawi and Botswana are in southern Africa; Kenya is east central). So why don't American blacks do as well as Nigerians and Ghanaians? Because it would seem to me that genetics is going to fail as an explanation. Wanna give it a try?

    What would happen to those black Africans in the US if they weren’t showered with Affirmative Action that was meant for American Blacks?

    And why aren’t they using their talents to fix their own much troubled nations? Why did they leave behind their own kind to live in the West?

    Read More
  126. @jacques sheete

    There is much contention as to whether even a single jew was killed in a gas chamber.
     
    Not only is there much contention, but there is no credible evidence that it really happened. Besides, the numbers are farcical.

    Where do they get 6 million?

    “Allowing for a maximum of 100,000 who succeeded in emigrating from Europe, this would bring the total number of Jews under the direct rule of Nazi Germany to about 3,200,000.”

    Distribution of the Jewish Population of Europe 1933-. 1940," prepared by Mr. Moses Moskowitz
    AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK 1941-1942, page 662

    http://www.ajcarchives.org/AJC_DATA/Files/1941_1942_9_Statistics.pdf
     
    I haven't checked in a while, but I wonder if the link is still active...

    Well, it continues to be terminal in Europe to question the Holocaust and the myth of gassing jews. They don’t hesitate to throw grandmothers in jail for questioning this sacred event:

    ′Nazi grandma′ Ursula Haverbeck sent to prison for holocaust denial

    http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/nazi-grandma-ursula-haverbeck-sent-prison-holocaust-denial-1637098

    An 88-year-old woman known as the ‘Nazi grandma’ has been sentenced to two years in jail for denying the holocaust and inciting hatred. Holocaust denier Ursula Haverbeck was handed a two-year prison sentence after she lost her appeal to reverse a 10-month sentence she received earlier this year.

    Earlier this year, Haverbeck was found guilty of sedition, the offence of inciting others to hatred and rebellion, after she published several articles in which she denied that the holocaust occurred in local newspaper Stimme des Reiches (Voices of the Reich).

    She also wrote a letter to the mayor of Detmold, a city in northern Germany, in which she referred to Auschwitz as a “lie” and claimed that the concentration camp was not an extermination camp, but rather a work camp.

    She denied that Nazis had gassed Jewish people to death, claiming that it was “not historically proven.”

    I can’t think of a single historical event other than this one that relegates an investigator to prison merely for casting doubt on its occurrence. There are people running around claiming that the Earth is flat, and nobody has been imprisoned for such scientific blasphemy. Why this one?

    Read More
  127. Hcat says: • Website
    @Bragadocious
    Could it be out of a deep sense of guilt of having committed the only “pan-genocide” in human history


    I guess Saker's never heard of the Ukranian Holodomor, perpetrated by his beloved Russia. And what were Spain, Portugal and Britain up to in the New World? This guy's a left-wing Euro clown.

    Argentina and Chile disposed of the Patagonians about the same time we were putting down Crazy Horse and Geronimo. So we aren’t at all the only ones.

    Read More
  128. Seems you are advocating collaborating with evil. Remember, all will kneel before Christ and be judged perfectly, and all evil will burn forever.

    Read More
  129. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @The Saker is DUMB
    I have follow this Saker guy for a while, and what is evident is that he is another moron, "I'm proud Russian but love the US." type of dumb-ass who has no sense of history and reality.

    "Minorities often have a deep-seated inferiority complex towards the putatively more successful majority."

    The statement above says it all. Inferiority complex, really. Tell that to the Iraqis, Libyans, The entire indigenous Aboriginals, Americans, and the Africans--who have been exterminated, subverted, and destroyed for centuries and still now...by the so-called "...more successful majority." This Saker guy is a racist to the core. After reading his childish rants about his beloved Russia being victim to the so-called AngloZionist, for what we may ask? Geo-politics. But he never fails to rail against the people under the western oppression, overt and covert. The US he now calls home, while preaching about being a proud Russia was built with blood and death, this fact goes un-noticed. This guy is am imbecile, a low level intellect pretending to be smart. A real intellect will use analysis of historical fact because writing this garbage. Everything you're enjoying in was built by blood, and you will pay the price. Karma.

    What's happening to western civilization is their own doing. You speak about Americans in the Ukraine and Russia is the victim, yeah right, what about Europe and America in Africa, Asia, and the America for 450 years of nothing but death and destruction. What about that? The Saker is Anti-semite, and a racist. The hatred of Jews is the driving logic, not the humanity.

    If anyone want to read a great Russian, a man of conviction who writes about the crimes of western man that guys like the Saker always omit, read Andre Vitchek. Now, this is a write that love humanity.

    So, your argument is that the white race should be hated and punished for its historical sins.

    All the more reason for us whites to wake up and expel every last Jew and shitskin from our lands. This will get ugly and you’re not going to like the outcome.

    Read More
  130. @War for Blair Mountain
    Well..you are wrong about that..America since it's inception has always been a White Nation...If you don't believe me..just ask Professor Noel Ignatieve-the Father of White Studies. Where I differ from Professor Noel Ignatieve:I think it's GREAT that America has historically been a White Nation...as did Socialist Labor Leader Samuel Gompers.


    As far as your last two sentences go:Bring back the 1888 Chinese Legal Immigrant Exclusion Act!!!!

    Saker

    The highly racialized Nonwhite Democratic Party Voting Bloc is the Voting Bloc for War on Christian Russia...not Trump's Whitey Racist Voting Bloc..

    Highly entertaining rants. Never change, Witch of Blair Mountain.

    Read More
  131. b4real says:
    @anarchyst
    ...there were MORE "holocaust ™" survivors immediately AFTER WW2 than there were populating all of Europe and Palestine at the time.
    You see, anyone who claims jewish ancestry is automatically a "holocaust ™" survivor...

    Are you familiar with Mark Twains’ tale of puddinhead wilson? There might be a clue or two in it for you.

    b4real

    Read More
  132. Well, they like it that way. Makes them feel important gives them an excuse to misbehave: all religions do that.

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All The Saker Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
A simple remedy for income stagnation
Confederate Flag Day, State Capitol, Raleigh, N.C. -- March 3, 2007
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored