The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 The Saker ArchiveBlogview
First They Came for the Nazis and Pedophiles…
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)

I have to begin this analysis by asking for your understanding for the fact that it will include a lot of full-length quotes. Under normal circumstances, I would have simply provided links, but considering the topic I will be discussing, and how some things suddenly “disappear” on the Internet, full-length quotes is probably the best option. The topic I want to deal with is the brutal crackdown on free speech by the AngloZionist Empire by means of its ‘loyal corporations’.

First they came for The Daily Stormer

I will begin this discussion by a summary of what recently happened to the Nazi website “The Daily Stormer” as described by Wikipedia. The reason why I am using Wikipedia is because it is clearly hostile to The Daily Stormer, so it cannot be accused of sympathy or of exaggerating what happened. Here is this account: (emphasis added)

The Daily Stormer helped organize the Unite the Right rally, a far-right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia on August 11 and 12, 2017, in which a counter-protester, Heather Heyer, was killed in a vehicular ramming. Weev also called for readers of The Daily Stormer to locate and attend Heyer’s funeral, calling her a “fat skank”.

On August 13, the website was informed by its domain registrar GoDaddy that it had violated the terms of service by mocking Heyer, and Anglin was given 24 hours to locate a new registrar for the site. The next day it moved to Google which almost immediately cancelled its registration for violation of terms, also terminating the website’s YouTube account.The following day, the website registered with Tucows, who canceled it hours later for regularly inciting violence. On August 15, it was announced by weev that the site had moved to the dark web, and that it was now only accessible via Tor, while Facebook banned links to the site and Discord banned its channel. On August 16, Cloudflare, the DNS provider and proxy service used to protect The Daily Stormer also terminated their service. Cloudflare had traditionally refused to terminate sites based on their content, but CEO Matthew Prince made an exception, posting a public announcement and explanation on the company blog. On August 17, after a relocation to dailystormer.ru, the Russian media watchdog Roskomnadzor requested a shutdown of the domain.

The Daily Stormer briefly returned to the clearnet with a .lol gTLD, dailystormer.lol, administered by Namecheap, but after two days, Namecheap canceled the domain. The company’s CEO Richard Kirkendall stated that “the quality and context of the material, paired with the support for violent groups and causes passes from protected free speech into incitement”, specifically quoting one published statement from The Daily Stormer: “It doesn’t take a Ph.D. in mathematics to understand that White men + pride + organization = Jews being stuffed into ovens.” The site returned to the web as punishedstormer.com on August 24, hosted by DreamHost, whose other far-right clients include National Vanguard and the North-West Front. DreamHost stated that they were “standing up for freedom and democracy”; denial-of-service attacks from Anonymous caused all of their sites to go offline.

Next, and even more appallingly, it is the Swiss encrypted email provider Protonmail (yes, the one I recently recommended to our community) which shut down the account of The Daily Stormer. This is how Lee Rogers, member of The Daily Stormer, describes what happened:

I Was Just Banned From ProtonMail
Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
August 23, 2017

ProtonMail just banned me from their email service claiming I committed abuse or fraud.

ProtonMail just banned me from their email service claiming I committed abuse or fraud.

Cross ProtonMail off the list of companies to do business with.

I signed up for an email account with them when the shutdown began. I needed a mechanism for people to contact me. A few folks suggested ProtonMail so I figured I’d give it a shot.

Fast forward a few days later and I find myself locked out of the account stating that it has been disabled due to abuse or fraud. How can one make such a determination in just a few days worth of time? They obviously banned me because a bunch of hate filled people complained to them.

As many folks already know, I like posting cute kitten photos and funny jokes on the Internet. Even though I get much enjoyment from those things, I get the most enjoyment out of providing financial support to the starving Jewish children in Israel. It is something that I am very passionate about. By banning me from their email service, it means I will have a more difficult time supporting those poor Jewish children. This upsets me greatly as I will no longer be able to email all the Christian donors I had lined up who wanted to support this very worthy cause.

By banning me from their email service, ProtonMail has proven that their hearts are filled with hatred towards Jewish children. They sure have lots of explaining to do! What should I tell those poor Jewish kids who go to bed hungry each and every day?

Curiously enough, they posted this tweet around the same time my account got banned. No idea if this means anything or not but I have never called for violence against anybody. I completely oppose such things.

Besides Andrew Anglin, I think I’ve been banned from more Internet services than anybody in history. The only thing these tech companies haven’t done to me yet is refuse service on my registered domain names. I’m sure that’s the next step though!

ORDER IT NOW

Before I proceed any further, let’s get something immediately out of the way: I have no use for Nazis (or any other kind of racists or racialists) and I have absolutely zero interest in what The Daily Stormer might or might not publish. In fact, until very recently, I had never heard of these people or their website.

Three question about Nazis which must be asked

However, there are many very good reasons to be appalled by what is taking place:

First, why was The Daily Stormer singled out for such crazy persecutions? Okay, okay – they are racists and Nazis. So? Does that really make them worse than anybody else? Last time I checked, none of the people involved with, or working for, The Daily Stormer had committed any personal crimes. Furthermore, had they committed any such crimes, why not go after them individually instead of going after their website? Why are the loyal corporations trying to shut down the speech of some individuals? Because they are ‘inciting violence’? That is ridiculous. The entire body of Marxist ideology is one long and never-ending incitations to (revolutionary) violence, yet nobody has ever tried to shut down all Marxist websites! Heck, the French national anthem is an incitation to violence! Since when does “free speech” exclude the incitation to violence?! Every single US President has made innumerable calls for violence (Trump recently against the DPRK), and yet nobody is censoring them? Could it be that the only reason The Daily Stormer is singled out is because it is relatively/comparably weak/poor and unable to defend itself?

Next, let’s look at the insipid notion that the Nazis were some kind of “horror of horrors”, some exceptionally evil phenomenon in human history and that therefore they deserve some special and unique form of political persecution. Here, again, let me get something immediately out of the way: I consider the Nazis of have been an abhorrent gang of arrogant genocidal racists maniacs. I do, I really do. I have *nothing* good to say about them. But what I categorically reject is the notion that they were somehow worse than all the other participants in WWII. Think of it, the Soviets? Peuhleeze! Just read Trotsky’s “Terrorism and Communism” or Lenin’s “Lessons of the Moscow Uprising” if you have any doubts about the fact that the Bolsheviks were genocidal maniacs! The Anglos? Need I remind everybody that the Anglos committed a butchery unique in world history: the genocidal extermination of all the ethnic groups of an entire continent (I call that a “pan-genocide”). How about Hiroshima, Nagasaki or the genocidal bombings of civilians in Germany? Yeah, I know, the Nazi genocide not only got a special name – the Holocaust, a misnomer by the way – but their genocide is the only one that has a mandatory casualty figure attached to it: 6 million (do you know of ANY other genocide which is always named along with an obligatory casualty figure? how about any other genocide whose exact number of victims cannot be legally investigated?). For seven decades now (actually, less, but nevermind that) we are told to mantrically repeat “Holocaust 6 million, Holocaust 6 million, Holocaust 6 million”. Why? Could it be that the real crime of the Nazis was not that they were genocidal maniacs, but that they lost WWII and that their (no less genocidal) enemies got to write the history of that war?

Then, it is true that nowadays everybody hates Nazis. Some for the right reasons (they were evil genocidal maniacs) and some for the wrong ones (the believe the anti-Nazi propaganda of the Ziomedia). But whether this is for the right or for the wrong reasons, most people hate Nazis. Not only that, but the simply use of the words “Nazi” or “Hitler” immediately disconnects the (already generally poor) critical/analytics capabilities of the vast majority of the people and that makes Nazis ideal villains. Could it be that the Nazis were singled out for repression by the AngloZionist Empire because they were ideal villains, “consensus villains” if you prefer?

I want to add here that even if we conclude that The Daily Stormer was singled out because it was weak and unable to defend itself, if we also conclude that the main crime of the Nazis was losing WWII and even if we conclude that the Nazis are perfect “consensus villains” this is no way implies that the Nazis were not every bit as bad as the imperial propaganda describes them. If I say that a murderer is not a rapist, that in no way implies that this murderer is a fine upstanding citizen since he still is a murderer. In the case of the Nazis this very much applies. For example, even if the Nazis did not kill 6 million Jews in gas chambers, it is established beyond any reasonable doubt, and not only by propagandists, that the Nazi Einsatzgruppen murdered a huge number of civilians. In fact, Raul Hilberg, probably the foremost expert on Nazi atrocities, estimates that these units killed over 2 million people. So even if somebody could prove that gas chambers and crematoria were never used to kill anybody, this will not whitewash the Nazis from their atrocities.

[Sidebar: there is a paradox here. Jewish propagandists very unwisely used the 6 million figure and the gas chambers + crematoria to show that Nazis were monsters. Now the Nazi propagandists are flipping the argument around and they say that since there is pretty good evidence that 6 million did not die and that gas chambers and crematoria were never used for mass murder of people, Nazis were snow-white pure doves who never committed any kind of atrocities. They are both lying of course. There is, in reality absolutely no need to stubbornly stick to the 6 million + gas chambers + crematoria narrative, which are extremely dubious claims, to establish that Nazis were genocidal monsters. After all, even if the Nazis murdered “only” 2-3 million civilians using bullets, disease, starvation and torture, that would still place them in the same league as Pol Pot. But that is something which neither Jews nor Nazis are willing to even look into, they stick to to their own myths in spite of all factual evidence].

I would note that there is another “consensus villain” out there which the Empire loves to single out for fear and hatred: the pedophiles. Okay, before somebody blows a coronary, let me also immediately and clearly state that I have nothing but disgust for pedophiles. That is not the point.

The point is that the AngloZionist Empire designates “consensus villains” to develop tools of repression (legal, technological, political, social) which then can be used against everybody and anybody.

Creating consensus villains

Check out the little collage I did representing a “Nazi pedophile”:

The Nazi pedophile: the ideal consensus villain
The Nazi pedophile: the ideal consensus villain

What I am trying to show with this image is how powerful the emotional response of each one of us is to an image combining a child in distress and Nazi Swastikas. What this kind of image does is create an emotional tsunami which easily smashes through any critical, rational, skeptical or analytical barrier in the brain of the person exposed to it. Though an image is probably stronger, the words “Nazi” and “pedophile” often have the same effect: to make us stop thinking and agree to anything to stop the putative Nazi and/or pedophiles. All that’s left is to give a name like “Protecting Our Children from Pedophile Nazis law” and you can pass anything, even laws justifying torture, arbitrary arrest or daily mandatory cavity searches for the entire population.

Still dubious? Okay.

Then ask yourself the following question: how is it that in a society saturated by pornography and in which homosexuals are slowly achieving what can only be called a hero status, how is it that everybody is SO concerned by child pornography? Seriously – do you *really* believe that anybody in our elites actually cares about children? If yes, I have a collection of bridges to sell you at unbeatable prices!

Of course our rulers don’t give a damn about our kids: the only use they have for our kids is to use them in the pedophile sex rings, that’s it (oh yes, while pedophilia is a crime for the commoner, it is a universal status symbol for our masters and overlords; Pizzagate anybody?). Ditto for pornography (the US porn industry is far bigger than Hollywood) or morals (we are in the “God is dead” post-Christian society, are we not?).

No, the pedophile has been singled out for the same reason as the Nazi: not because they are bad (which they, of course, are!) but because they are both easy, almost defenseless, targets and ideal ‘consensus villains’. Let me repeat this: for the AngloZionist the function of pedophiles and Nazis is to provide an ideal defenseless villain and their purpose is to make it possible to create the tools used to oppress us all.

[Sidebar: To get a sense of how much Nazis have been demonized, just look at this Wikipedia list of organizations advocating pedophilia (this time I left the footnotes so you can check the source)

International

Ipce (formerly International Pedophile and Child Emancipation, changed its name in 1998 to disassociate with the full name). Founded in the early 1990s; in 2005, it had 79 members in 20 countries.[1][2][3] The organization has websites available in English,[4] French,[5] German,[6] and Spanish.[7]

Australia

Australian Man/Boy Love Association (AMBLA).[8]

Australian Paedophile Support Group (APSG). Founded in 1980 or 1983 according to other sources. It was succeeded by the Boy Lovers and Zucchini Eaters (BLAZE), another group dismantled by police.[9]

Belgium

Dokumentatiedienst Pedofilie.[10]

Centre de recherche et d’information sur l’enfance et la sexualité (fr), 1982–1986. Founded by Philippe Charpentier. The group published the magazine L’Espoir.[11]

Fach Und Selbsthilfegruppe Paedophilie. Founded at the early 1970s.[10]

Stiekum.[10]

Studiegroep Pedofilie.[10] Defunct.

Canada

Coalition Pédophile Québécois.[8]

Fondation Nouvelle. Defunct.[1]

Denmark

Danish Pedophile Association (DPA), 1985–2004. One of the most important pedophile associations in Europe.[10][12]

France

Groupe de Recherche pour une Enfance Différente (GRED), 1979–1987. The group published the bulletin Le Petit Gredin (The Little Rogue).[10]

Germany

See also: 1970s and 1980s pedophilia debate (in German)

AG-Pädo. Founded in 1991 by the association Arbeitsgruppe des Bundesverbandes Homosexualität.[8][13]

Aktion Freis Leben (AFL).[8]

Arbeitskreis Päderastie-Pädophilie (APF). Active in the early 1980s.[10]

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Humane Sexualität (de) (AHS).

Arbeitsgemeinschaft “Schwule, Päderasten und Transsexuelle” (“working group ‘gays, pederasts and transsexuals’”). Faction of the German Green Party involved in pro-pedophile activism.[14][15][16][17] See de:Pädophilie-Debatte (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) (“Pedophilia Debate (Alliance ’90/The Greens”)

Deutsche Studien- und Arbeitsgemeinschaft Pädophilie (DSAP). 1979–1983.[8]

Fach und Selbsthilfegruppe Paedophilie.[8]

Indianerkommune. Active from the 1970s through the mid-1980s.[10] Self-defined as children’s liberation commune, strongly identifying as pedophile, active late 1970s-late 1980s; according to some authors there are several independent local groups active in Germany today.[18]

Kanalratten. Offshoot of the Indianerkommune but for female pedophiles.[19]

Kinderfrühling.[20]

Krumme 13 (K13), 1993– aktuell bis heute und im Internet präsent.[21][22]

Pädoguppe, Rat und Tat-Zentrum.[8]

Pädophile Selbsthilfe- und Emanzipationsgruppe München (SHG).[23] Founded in 1979.[24] Starting in 2003, police began raiding its members, resulting in more than half a million items of child pornography seized and multiple arrests.[25]

Verein für sexuelle Gleichberechtigung. Founded in Munich. 1973–1988[26]

Werkgruppe Pedophilie.[27]

Italy

Gruppo P. Founded in 1989 by Francesco Vallini.[28] Despite its legitimate status, Vallini spent three years in prison for running a criminal association. Despite this, the well-established gay magazine Babilonia continues to employ Vallini, and to support his ideas, although Gruppo P as such may be no more. The group published the bulletin Corriere del pedofili.[29]

Netherlands

Enclave Kring. Founded in the 1950s by the psychologist Frits Bernard.[30]

Jon. Founded in 1979 by the Dutch Society for Sexual Reform.[8]

Party for Neighbourly Love, Freedom, and Diversity, 2006–2008. Dutch political party that advocated lowering the legal age of consent to 12 years old and legalizing child pornography.[31]

ORDER IT NOW

Vereniging Martijn. Founded in 1982. The most important pedophile association in Europe. On 27 June 2012 a Dutch court ruled that the group was illegal and ordered it to disband immediately.[32] However this decision was overturned by a higher court in April 2013. The judge motivated his or her decision by stating that the club did not commit crimes and had the right of freedom of association.[33] Nevertheless, on 27 June 2012 a Dutch court ruled that the group was illegal and ordered it to disband immediately. This decision was overturned by a higher court, which itself was overturned by The Dutch Supreme Court on 18 April 2014, resulting in a final ban of the association. The association filed an appeal at the European Court of Human Rights but it was rejected. The group published the bulletin OK Magazine.[34]

Norway

Norwegian Pedophile Group.[27]

Amnesty for Child Sexuality.[27]

Switzerland

Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft Pädophile.[10]

United Kingdom

Paedophile Action for Liberation, 1974, merged with PIE in 1975.[10]

Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), 1974–1984. It was affiliated to the National Council for Civil Liberties, now known as Liberty, between 1978 and 1983, the year in which it was expelled.[35] It published the magazines Magpie, Understanding Paedophilia and Childhood Rights.[10][36]

United States

Childhood Sensuality Circle (CSC). Founded in 1971 in San Diego (California) by a student of Wilhelm Reich.[10]

North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). 1978–present. Considered to be largely defunct.[37][38]

Pedophile Information Society.[39]

Project Truth. One of the organizations which was expulsed from ILGA in 1994 as a pedophile organization.[3] Defunct.

René Guyon Society. Possibly fictitious. Its slogan was “sex before eight, or it’s too late”.[27]

Noticed something interesting? These pedophile organizations ALL have their websites. And yet nobody in the doubleplusgoodthinking community has event tried to shut them down, nevermind systematically persecuting them like The Daily Stormer! Why is that? Are Nazis so much worse than even pedophiles?]

 

There is also another particularly toxic side-effect for creating “consensus villains”: it makes it easy for non-consensus villains to hide. Let’s take a very simple example: the so-called “Holocaust”. It is often said that there is a need for, I kid you not, “Holocaust education” to make absolutely sure that “such an abomination does not happen again”. Not happen again?! It never stopped!!! The decolonization of Africa was a bloodbath, US wars in Korea and Vietnam killed millions of people, as did the US sponsored civil war in Indonesia. The Cambodian genocide, the Bangladesh war of Independence, Mozambican Civil War – all saw millions of people murdered. More recently, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the genocide in Rwanda, the US occupation of Iraq, the 2nd Congo war – they all killed several million of people. It is obscene, grotesque and outrageous to say “never again” it in reality it never stopped. Or let’s take the example of pedophilia: I am absolutely convinced that the Empire publicly persecutes pedophiles only because it refuses to look at the horrors the porn industry generates, not only amongst its “performers”, but in the millions of individuals and families it affects (and if you think that these are the paranoid ravings on a prudish Christian fundamentalist, just read this article and wake up to the real world! I also highly recommend the second chapter “The Illusion of Love” in Chris Hedges wonderful book “Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle” which I consider to be a “must read” to understand the United State’s society).

The horrible truth is that neither Nazis nor pedophiles are in any way exceptional. They are just the typical products of a world gone mad with arrogance, hatred and maniacal perversion. You don’t just do away with any and all forms of spirituality, with any sense of the sacred or absolute, and not pay the consequences of that kind of folly. The condemnation of Nazis and pedophiles is just a particularly hypocritical form of virtue-signaling by forces and individuals which are every bit as evil and perverted as the Nazis and pedophiles which they so vehemently denounce and condemn. We should not let the tree hide the forest, and neither should we allow one SOB to hide a multitude of other SOBs.

Subcontracting the repression of free speech to private contractors

What is taking place right now is that the Neocons have found a clever way to circumvent the constitutional guarantees (such as the First Amendment) by privatizing the repression of free speech. This is really nothing new: the Pentagon has been waging illegal wars by using “private contractors” just as the “3 letter” agencies have been illegally spying on us by also using private intelligence companies. Now the Neocons are using the private sector to crack down on our freedoms: ain’t capitalism just wonderful?!

Let’s take the example of the The Daily Stormer again: if the US government had barred The Daily Stormer from having a website or from using email, the ACLU would have been up in arms. But since this is done by the private sector and not by the government, the ACLU has absolutely nothing to say. Why? Because the “terms of service” (which nobody ever reads) give IT companies practically limitless power to do what they want with your data and the power to deny you any and all of their services. To use Google (or any other IT company’s services) is not a right. That’s that simple.

The key problem here is that, taking the example of the The Daily Stormer, Godaddy+Google+YouTube+Facebook pretty much *is* the Internet. Oh sure, right now The Daily Stormer is hiding in the “dark web” (at http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/ ) and can only be accessed by using a Tor router and where it is not indexed by search engines (also, at the time of writing, it is also located here: https://dailystormer.al/ but God only knows for how long). But this is irrelevant. The Empire does not give a damn about what happens in some remote corner of the Internet, it only cares about being able to control what happens in about 90% of the Internet, and that 90% is controlled by a relatively short list of loyal corporations which are more than happen to do the Empire’s bidding even without a court order.

It now also appears that, at least according to the Wikipedia article above, Anonymous is willing to act as the Empire’s enforcer. Of course, this might be the NSA pretending to be Anonymous. We will never know.

This was inevitable I would add. The Founding Fathers crafted the US Constitution (and other legal instruments) to protect the people from government abuse. They could never have imagined that the ruling elites would dismantle as much of the government as possible (mostly the most useful parts) and replace it with private corporations. US civil right leaders were so obsessed with Uncle Sam that they never even noticed how the US corporate world quietly and legally enslaved them, on behalf of the ‘deep state’, of course, whose main component today are the Neocons.

So what must we do about this?

The liberation of our minds and of the technologies we use

I think that we must accept the Neocons’ conceptual challenge: they are literally daring us to oppose the persecution of Nazis and pedophiles. We, therefore, must do exactly that – try to make it impossible for the Neocons to persecute the Nazis and the pedophiles. Not for their sake, of course, but for *ours*! Because if the Empire can do this to the Nazis, then the Empire can do it to anybody next. Truly, “first they came for the Nazis and pedophiles”…

[Sidebar: seventy two years after the end of WWII, the tables have been fully turned, and now the famous verses by Pastor Niemöller should begin by “First they came for the Nazis and pedophiles”. I can imagine how absolutely appalled Pastor Niemöller would be if he found out that his famous anti-Nazis words are now being used to defend the freedoms of Nazis and pedophiles. He would be appalled, yes, and saddened, but I am sure that he would also understand and agree.]

I submit that it is high time for all of us to refuse to be treated like laboratory rats who are trained by operant conditioning to worship X (Barack Obama) and loathe Y (Nazis). Nazis and pedophiles fully deserve our disgust and rejection, but not because we have been brainwashed to hate them, not because they represent some kind of ‘super-evil’, but simply because they truly are abhorrent. Those who want to brainwash us into hating them don’t trust us to come to that conclusion without brainwashing and that is, I submit, is very offensive and demeaning for us. We need to tell those who would have us terminally brainwashed that we can come to our own conclusions, thank you very much, and that they can keep their brainwashing to themselves.

Besides liberating us for the ideological yoke imposed on us by the imperial propaganda machine, there are also technological issues which need to be looked into. For example, having a website and using encrypted emails. We all need this, right? Except that now, this might be a very hard thing to find. What if there was a corporation out there which would openly declare that this corporation’s services would not be denied to anybody for any reasons? What if a corporation declared, on principle, that Nazis, pedophiles and terrorists accounts would never be closed or otherwise compromised? Would that not be exactly the corporation you would want to open an account with?

First, let’s be realistic and not ask any service provider to ignore a court order. In the abstract, that could be very noble, but not very realistic. However, our first condition could be that the service provider would only close down or otherwise limit our account if given a legal court order. Terms of service which would include that provision could, in theory, make even the United States a fairly safe jurisdiction. Switzerland or Iceland would be even better.

I don’t know if this is technically feasible, but it would be even better if the service provider made it technically impossible for itself to shut down an account. There have been some steps taken towards this kind of setup. For example, Protonmail encrypts the user inbox in such a way that even if a Swiss court ordered Protonmail to produce a user’s inbox contents Protonmail would only be able to hand over highly encrypted files but not the plaintext. This makes me wonder if it would be possible to have one authority (the service provider) deal with the creation of one account but that this account, once created, would be technically impossible to close down for the service provider. What if that account was hosted on a P2P network or if the credentials to create an account were insufficient to close it down? I don’t know, I am just thinking out loud here. Any opinions?

Second, the corporate headquarters, financial assets and servers would have to be located in fairly safe jurisdictions. Protonmail has its corporate headquarters and bank accounts in Switzerland (their servers are distributed, some are even in Israel, sigh…). Maybe it would be better to separate them all in different jurisdictions? Distributed jurisdictions maybe?

[Sidebar: here I have to admit to my great regret and shame that Russia under Putin is no better than the USA and, frankly, Russia is even worse in many aspects. The sad reality is that the Russian government, under the pious pretext of anti-terrorism, has passed many freedom and privacy crushing laws and that the legal guarantees offered to free speech in Russia are close to zero. Yeah, *right now* there is a good guy in power, but if tomorrow, God forbid, some kind of “Eltsinoid” comes to power there is nothing preventing the Russian government from totally banning encryption, shutting down “politically incorrect” websites, etc. The sames goes for Iran and China, by the way. I am personally lucky that my blog is not blocked in Iran – yes, I had this checked – but many others are. China might be the worst offender of them all: they now want to introduce the mandatory registration of passport data for each person using any social media! This is paradoxical, but the countries who are at the forefront of the resistance to the AngloZionist Empire have even less of a culture of freedom, especially on the Internet, than the USA or most EU countries. This is very bad news for us because that means that we are probably more likely to find a solution to our problems in the West than we are in countries such as Russia, Iran or China. It is quite telling (see above) that Roskomnadzor instead of providing a safe heaven in Russia for The Daily Stormer actually demanded (and obtain) that their Russian domain be shot down. Shame on Russia, is all I can say!]

Will such a service provider ever be created? I want to hope that yes. I was tremendously encouraged by the reaction of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (see here for full text) which strongly condemned the actions of the loyal corporations and who clearly said:

Protecting free speech is not something we do because we agree with all of the speech that gets protected. We do it because we believe that no one—not the government and not private commercial enterprises—should decide who gets to speak and who doesn’t.

God bless their hearts! I am proud to be a member of the EFF.

The Free Software Foundation (FSF), of which I am also a member, might have to come up with the technology to guarantee that nobody, including “consensus villains” is stripped form the right to present ideas or to securely communicate.

I can hear the objection “what about the terrorists?” To this I would reply two things:

  1. As far as I know, all terrorists are state-sponsored.
  2. Terrorists can *easily* bypass any forms of state control (mostly by not revealing which email accounts they use).

So this “we will give the terrorists the means to communicate” is a total canard.

ORDER IT NOW

As a tool for freedom, the Internet has truly been fantastic. But we also have to recognize that it has its weak points, especially its “points of entry” (the so-called Network Access Points or NAPs) and domain name registration mechanism (via ICANN). Governments cannot shot down the Internet. Government and the private sector together probably can.

And then there is the problem of search engines. Right now Google reigns supreme, and the runner-up (Yandex) is very much is focusing on the Russian Internet. There are plenty of other search engines, but none of them offer any guarantees of being a-political. Yet again, this is a challenge for the free software community which will have to come up with a solution, but this will take time.

Preempting some inevitable accusations

Did you notice how many times in this article I had to go out of my way to preempt the accusation that I have some kind of sympathy for the Nazis? Well, I am pretty sure that some dimwit will try to post a comment accusing me of being a Nazi anyway. When that happens, please consider it an example of how easily the word “Nazi” turns some brains into mush. Some will also accuse me of being a crypto-Nazi (or something to the same effect) not because they really believe that, but because they will lack any logical and fact based arguments to dispute my points. They will hope that the “Nazi” label will serve to simply remove my arguments from the awareness of the well-conditioned readers. Finally, there will also be the inevitable “offended Nazis” who will be absolutely outraged that a guy who dares question the 6 million + gas chambers + crematoria ALSO calls Nazis evil racist genocidal maniacs (they also hate it when I speak of Ukronazis – apparently the fact that there are plenty of Jews in the Ukie leadership is evidence that the Ukronazis are not Nazis. Makes me wonder if these guys realize how much Nazis and Zionists are alike or whether they don’t understand that the Israeli government is, ideologically speaking, simply a Jewish version National-Socialist ideas, policies and even methods). That kind of arguments usually begin with “it sounds like” or “in other words” or “so what you are saying” etc. My reply is simple: I wrote what I wrote. If I wanted to write something different, I would have. So, please, spare us the usual “creative paraphrasing” of what it actually says.

Conclusion: the last groups of resistance

The current hysteria around the Alt-Right, the Daily Stormer or Trump as the “KKK Candidate” are not just the result of the corporate media being controlled by sensationalist idiots. This is a deliberate strategic psyop campaign whose aim is to topple Trump and crackdown on the legitimate aspirations of millions of Americans who simply want their country back. It all began by a color revolution against Trump, followed by a successful coup and now the Neocons are turning their attention to us, the regular people. In their sick minds, if we are not brainwashed Clintonbots then we are all neo-Nazis of some kind. For them, the Daily Stormer or the Alt-Right are just the evidence and the pretext they need to crack-down on our civil liberties and human rights. To make thing worse, the so-called Left (I say “so-called” because, let me tell you, there is no real Left in the USA, only ignorant dumbasses would call Obama a Socialist!) has totally failed to understand that “first they came for the Alt-Right” and, instead, the participate in the “Trump is a racist” campaign. Frankly, I find the US liberals beyond any hope, terminally brain-dead, and politically they are idiots at the service of the Neocons. We all know where the Neocons stand. So that leaves only two groups who are still capable of thought and these are the paleoconservatives and the libertarians. They are not exactly my cup of tea with their economic ideas and myths, but that really is irrelevant at this point. What matters is that they are the last ones standing for the following basic principles:

  1. Support for Constitutional freedoms and civil rights
  2. Opposition to empire and foreign wars
  3. Resistance against the social and political agenda of the “coalition of minorities

I think that by now most paleoconservatives and libertarians have understood that “the Trump presidency is over” as Bannon put it. Trump is a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons. But what Trump stood for during his election still deserves to be fought for. Forget the man, but remember the values, the ideas, the principles which got him elected. These values are all that stands between us and a life of servitude to the Neocons and their AngloZionist Empire. This is also all that stands between mankind and a possible world war.

[Sidebar: to my (real) Leftist friends: no, I am not endorsing the political views of the paleoconservatives or the libertarians. But I am saying that in the US context these are the only two political forces left which are mentally capable of resistance. As I said, there is no real organized Left north of the Rio Grande, sorry. And, before you ask, the Antifa who are just dumb tools in the hands of the Neocons. Yes, there are some real Leftist individuals in the USA, surprisingly many I would say, but nothing organized, no movement. This is a disaster and a tragedy, but this is also the sad reality.]

What the Neocon propaganda machine has been doing is to try to place the paleoconservatives and the libertarians into either the category “Putin agent” (Ron Paul) or Nazi (Pat Buchanan). If they succeed, then it’s really the end, folks. But they probably won’t because in a dialectical response to the challenge from the Neocons the paleocons and libertarians are slowly transforming themselves into a kind of patriotic movement (as opposed to party) whose views are shared by most of those who had hopes that Trump would “drain the swamp”. This is the real target of the Neocons, not the tiny minority of US Neo-Nazis or the basically irrelevant pedophiles. One their legal, technical and organizational capabilities are fully developed, the Neocons will come after US patriots because they are the last thing standing between them and total control of the United States.

 
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. “America isn’t easy. America is advanced citizenship. You’ve gotta want it bad, ’cause it’s gonna put up a fight. It’s gonna say, “You want free speech? Let’s see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who’s standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.” You want to claim this land as the land of the free? Then the symbol of your country cannot just be a flag. The symbol also has to be one of its citizens exercising his right to burn that flag in protest. Now show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms. ”

    –Michael Douglass as a fictional US President in “The American President”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /tsaker/first-they-came-for-the-nazis-and-pedophiles/#comment-1989090
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Brabantian says: • Website

    Slight correction to Saker’s initial version of article above … in fact you do not need the Tor browser to access the Daily Stormer on the Dark Web or Darknet, you can use the work-around developed by a group including the late suicided hacker Aaron Swartz with his ‘Tor2Web’ project … you can read Andrew Anglin & his Daily Stormer by slightly amending the Tor ‘onion’ address with a ‘link’ enabling you to see a Tor site in your regular web browser, like this:

    https://dstormer6em3i4km.onion.link/

    It looks like the Albanian web host for Daily Stormer, ‘Bulletproof Domains’, finally also folded after several days, as the dailystormer-dot-al address seems to be not working as of the moment

    Andrew Anglin who runs the Daily Stormer quite resents being forced onto Tor as his platform, which Anglin describes as follows:

    “The Tor Project is primarily run by Jewish paedophiles who have created a huge networking platform for child pornography & slave trafficking while hiding behind some gobbledygook about Chinese political dissidents who can easily just use a normal VPN & host their site on any western server.” [VPN - Virtual Private Network, tool hiding your actual internet 'IP' address]

    “The Darkweb [accessible through Tor] is mainly used by paedophiles to share child pornography. … The Tor project claims to be designed for Chinese political dissidents – or whatever – but the main use of the software has been for child porn, & it is not believable that this amount of resources would be expended on some shite for Chinese political dissidents who can just buy a normal VPN if they need it. Slave traffickers, terrorists, assassins & drug dealers also use the Tor service … The Tor development team had never given comment on paedophiles or anyone else using the service, but felt the need to come out & condemn the [neo-Nazi] Daily Stormer [after the Daily Stormer was forced to host via Tor]”

    Indeed the ‘China dissident’ pretext for Tor seems fake … Governments can easily & simply block usage of Tor, it seems, as China & Iran apparently do … Plus it is easy for any government / internet provider to see if you have downloaded Tor, even if they couldn’t tell where you go using it.

    And Tor does seem rather Jewish. One former Tor top figure, Jacob Appelbaum, left Tor amidst large public sexual abuse scandals. Here, a link to a photo of Jewish Tor board members with large Jewish synagogue ceremonial Torah scroll

    Read More
  3. I think that by now most paleoconservatives and libertarians have understood that “the Trump presidency is over” as Bannon put it. Trump is a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons.

    What if Trump doesn’t know he’s “a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons.” ? What if he does know this and doesn’t give a damn? What if only a crushed and neutered intellectual midget with guts can prevail in this chaos? If not Trump, who? If not Trump, when? Times running out, friends.

    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    Read More
    • Agree: Sowhat
    • Replies: @Realist
    "What if Trump doesn’t know he’s “a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons.” ? What if he does know this and doesn’t give a damn? What if only a crushed and neutered intellectual midget with guts can prevail in this chaos?"

    Then the Deep State will kill him.
    , @therevolutionwas
    Trump has no philosophical base. If he does the "right thing" it would be a chance event. The man is all over the place. Sadly.
    , @JVC
    Robert--The swamp has swallowed up Trump, and I suspect he knows it. The country is now being openly run by a military junta (which has been in charge all along-since WWII anyway). Trump knows that the only way he remains upright and breathing is to do what he is told to do. Unfortunately, the fact that elections (in this country and elsewhere) do not and can not change anything has been made perfectly clear this go round.
  4. So that leaves only two groups who are still capable of thought and these are the paleoconservatives and the libertarians.

    I don’t think any of them (and especially not the libertarians) are going to help you. It’s just like the ACLU: whatever private actors do, whomever they ban, it’s all fine. If you want to publish a public-enemy-style website, and no hosting company wants you — then get rich and open your own hosting company, your own email service, and your own search engine. End of story.

    This is capitalism, man. What do you suggest should happen?

    Read More
    • Replies: @cricket
    I believe The Saker is referring to the intellectual horsepower of said groups, not the logistics to affect dissemination of said ideas. Also, libertarians are often misunderstood in their core philosophy, which is primarily philosophical, not economic, (the economics are more of a corollary to the political idea of small-government or de-centralized government). Thus, their radar is by nature far more attune to government overreach. See antiwar.com for instance.

    If you want to argue that they lack numeric quantity to make much of a difference, I would probably agree, in large part due to their political marginalization.
    , @Eagle Eye

    China might be the worst offender of them all: they now want to introduce the mandatory registration of passport data for each person using any social media!
     
    China is way behind the curve.

    Go to any public library in the U.S. and ask to use their computer. They will insist that you log on with your library card which itself is based on government ID. I.e., in the U.S. you are required to register "passport data" before you can go online. (BTW why do public libraries, supposedly run locally, all follow the same practice? Still think they don't share your lending records?)

    But you are not at the library, you are using a private provider? The quasi-public AT&T? Your IP address is registered with various government agencies, known to Google (go to maps.google.com using a virgin browser), etc.

    Using VPN servers? Input and output are monitored through the ISP, even if the VPN operator itself doesn't sell you out directly (which they probably do, having been told that theirs is a nice little business, and it would be a shame if anything were to happen to it).

    Using WiFi at a cafe? Your individual computer has an online fingerprint that can be ascertained cheaply and reliably from certain communications parameters which the NSA and others can readily link back to your real-world ID. All of this is happening reliably, automatically 24/7.

    OK - you're ultra-paranoid and using TOR. Who finances TOR? Do you have access to all their records? Do you personally know each of their programmers (including those of bought-in software components)? Oh but they told you you can trust them? Have you personally screened every line of TOR's source code? Do you know what happens upstream and downstream of the TOR system?

  5. Cyrano says:

    The reason why the Anglo-Saxon elites of the US will milk the holocaust for propaganda purposes forever is because it makes them the good guys. The holocaust did happen, but it has been so over exploited by US and the chosen ones that it’s starting to lose its appeal.

    At the closing stages of WW2 when the Russians first reported the atrocities that they discovered in the liberated concentration camps, the US elites refused to believe that their Anglo-Saxon brothers, a highly civilized nation such as they were, would commit such barbarities. They called it – of course – communist propaganda. When the evidence became overwhelming, the US elites had to regroup and come up with a new strategy to exploit this newly developed situation.

    What they came up with was this: Primary victors of WW2 were the communists, the victory in WW2 is easily attributable to USSR to the tune of at least 80%. The primary victims of WW2 in absolute numbers were also the citizens of the same communist country – USSR , 26 million of them died.

    This was really a bad material for propaganda which can serve US interests. It definitely wasn’t in their interest to promote the communists as the biggest victims and victors of WW2.Then the brilliant idea occurred to them, what if we declare the Jews as the primary victims of WW2 (which in all fairness they were in terms of % of their population exterminated in Europe, but not in absolute numbers)?

    Nevertheless, by designating the Jews as the primary victims of WW2 and coming out as their biggest supporters – the US became the ultimate good guys of WW2. Nazis were vilified for obvious reasons, communists can’t be the good guys no matter what, but being the biggest friends of the biggest victims, made US the nicest people that participated in WW2. That’s why they can never let go of that story. If they stop supporting the chosen ones, they whole narrative of US being the good guys by association with the biggest victims will collapse, which doesn’t serve the interests of either of them.

    By the way here is my formula for explaining the theory of relativity:

    Chosen people = ubermensch = Exceptional people

    They all talk about the same thing. The first are chosen by God, the second are chosen by Mother Nature (superior genes), and the third ones are chosen by themselves.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    "The reason why the Anglo-Saxon elites of the US will milk the holocaust for propaganda purposes forever is because it makes them the good guys."

    That is true, but it is NOT the primary reason, not the foundational reason. That reason is that WASP culture is formed by the Reformation hitting the revived Germanic (Anglo-Saxon) sense among the English. WASP culture was crystalized, fully formed, by the start of the English Civil War. WASP culture goes hand in hand with the Puritans, and Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. Judaizing heresy will always breed pro-Jewish culture.

    And that is easily observable in the Purtians. Oliver Cromwell made the deal with Jews, taking their money and granting Jews special privileges that were not available to the vast majority of British Isles white Christians, so he could continue to wage war to exterminate as much of the heritage of Christendom as possible.

    WASP culture has always been pro-Jewish and violently opposed to the interests and desires of the vast majority of non-WASP whites.
    , @anarchyst
    If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD THEY KEEP RECORDS?? WHY would they build “camps” hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, recreational, medical and other ancillary facilities. Would it not have been easier to just “eliminate” them without going through all of this trouble? The jewish communist Bolsheviks did just that with the non-communist civilian populations of the conquered countries in the communist orbit. In fact, only Christian and Russian Orthodox church property was "repurposed" into stables and warehouses. Not one synagogue was touched.

    Something BIG “stinks” in this whole jewish “holocaust ™” deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made “deals” with the Nazis in order to make life “uncomfortable” for jewish Germans.

    The establishment of a “homeland” was a Zionist “dream” since the 1800s. What better way to encourage “emigration” to a strange land than to make things difficult for the “cream of German society” (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” is out . . .

    The so-called jewish “holocaust ™” has been turned into a de-facto “religion” in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish “holocaust ™” truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the “tribe” that FEAR the real truth of the jewish “holocaust ™” being exposed is evident.

    The truth about this minor event in human history will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a “cash cow” that “keeps on giving”. . . “there’s NO business like “SHOAH business”.

    Zionist Jewish complicity in this event is carefully “covered up”.

    It is curious to note that Zionist jewish interests will hunt down and imprison a 90 plus year-old German “camp guard” while looking the other way when their “own kind” was involved in truly brutal actions. Camp “capos” and “sonderkommandos” (who were primarily jewish) come to mind. Not one of these jewish “collaborators” has been brought to justice. I guess blood is thicker than water.

    A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question “official” jewish “holocaust” orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the “official” jewish “holocaust” story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to “all things holocaust”.

    Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment. . .

    If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the “chosen”) to engineer the jewish “holocaust”, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish “holocaust” was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state. In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many “holocausts” of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish “holocaust” is the only one that counts . . .

    Many jews will never be satisfied with knowing that those that commit evil deeds on earth in this lifetime will pay for it in the next life . . . they have taken vengeance from the Creator and appointed themselves the exacter of vengeance (in contradiction to mosaic law but not their anti-gentile talmud).

    Many jews are vengeful people that will never pass up a chance to “make a buck” by screwing a gentile (goyim) out of money or property. jews were hated in Germany for taking advantage of the non-jew Germans between the two world wars. The average German did not have a pot to piss in while his wealthy jewish neighbor was trading food for land . . . taking advantage of the jewish bankster situation in Germany.

    Look at the “commercialization” of the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” while the much larger communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten. To assure a continuing supply of jewish “holocaust ™” “survivors”, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean “camp” numbers) on their children and grandchildren.

    Since "world jewry" (Judea) declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), Germany had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least).. This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a “homeland” – Israel.

    Zionists have been predicting a jewish “homeland” for the last two-hundred years while predicting a “holocaust ™” of 6 million for the same amount of time. The ACTUAL number of non-combatant deaths in the European theater of operations is approximately 731,000, NOT 6 million (official International Red Cross figures).

    Regarding that “holocaust ™” “showplace” Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called “gas chambers”. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called “gassing” took place”. From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the “operators” of these supposed “gas chambers”.

    American execution expert, Fred Leuchter traveled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported “gas chambers”, had them tested and published his results. The absence of methylene blue in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the “gas chambers” did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing.

    Mr. Leuchter was rewarded for his search for TRUTH by his professional and personal character assassination by those of the “tribe”. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts “law” for “practicing engineering without a license” – a law which had never been used before or since. . .

    It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets attempted to “create” the “death camps” for propaganda purposes.

    The engineering inconsistencies proves that these “death camps” were recreated for communist propaganda purposes. Germans were excellent engineers, and as such, would not have made the engineering “mistakes” that are evident.

    Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering–many people perished. However, the prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

    After the end of WW2, German civilians were interned. These German civilians were subject to much greater deprivation and suffering than the “occupants” of the “camps”. In fact, jews were controlling these camps, at the behest of the Allied forces, and were vicious in their treatment of those interned. In fact, the German civilians interned were defined as “disarmed enemy combatants” despite being civilians, so that Geneva Convention rules would not apply to them.

    In fact, it was JEWS that ran the internment camps after WW2. I guess vengeance was theirs, as the Germans made the Zionist jews WORK (manual labor in the camps) for the first time in their lives…
  6. cricket says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    So that leaves only two groups who are still capable of thought and these are the paleoconservatives and the libertarians.
     
    I don't think any of them (and especially not the libertarians) are going to help you. It's just like the ACLU: whatever private actors do, whomever they ban, it's all fine. If you want to publish a public-enemy-style website, and no hosting company wants you -- then get rich and open your own hosting company, your own email service, and your own search engine. End of story.

    This is capitalism, man. What do you suggest should happen?

    I believe The Saker is referring to the intellectual horsepower of said groups, not the logistics to affect dissemination of said ideas. Also, libertarians are often misunderstood in their core philosophy, which is primarily philosophical, not economic, (the economics are more of a corollary to the political idea of small-government or de-centralized government). Thus, their radar is by nature far more attune to government overreach. See antiwar.com for instance.

    If you want to argue that they lack numeric quantity to make much of a difference, I would probably agree, in large part due to their political marginalization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    I believe The Saker is referring to the intellectual horsepower of said groups, not the logistics to affect dissemination of said ideas.
     
    Yeah, but like I said, the libertarians don't see any problem with private actors banning unpopular (or undesirable, i.e.: communist) speech. And that will always happen.

    As for the paleoconservatives, they may not be too unsympathetic to the Nazis specifically, but I don't think they would have any problem with suppressing and banning the forms of discourse that they consider subversive, harmful to 'the nation'.
  7. cricket says:

    I am pretty sure I get what The Saker is trying to say. However, I wish he would reconsider some of the context/tactics that weaken the overall argument he lays out.

    1. Pedophiles are the most disgusting form of human on Earth. By nature, being a pedophile requires an action, which is both illegal and immoral, and has nothing to do with 1st amendment/free speech rights. It is prosecutable under law as it should be.

    2. The hypocrisy between allowing child molester (chomo) websites and deleting Nazi-sympathizing websites is duly noted and correct; however, simply “hating” people is not an action, where being a chomo is. There is a fundamental difference and no slippery slope insofar as this particular analogy. For example, a declaration of “I hate Jews” is not the same as actually raping a child. One is an action, the other is talk.

    3. The 1st amendment is quite specific as what you can and can’t do, as well as legal (and moral) precedent over obscenity, which chomo websites likely violate with regularity (I won’t be visiting any). As long as direct, specific violence isn’t advocated by daily stormer, they should be on solid legal grounds. Here, the corporations have circumvented their legal rights.

    4. the 1st amendment’s primary, and only real functionary concern was to allow the citizenry to speak out against the government. You don’t get to do the proverbial yelling of “Fire!” in a crowded theater when there isn’t one. In other words, its largely a political context. Chomos are not political; they are just the most disgusting form of criminal. Nazis, as despicable as their position may be, are a dissident political view and as such have protected 1st amendment rights (as long as they are not actually engaging directly in violence).

    I hope The Saker were to consider some of this in order to form a more well founded argument, as I believe his overall thesis is correct and that he in no way is an advocate of chomos or Nazis. This is why it is important to have free discussion: to refine and flesh out political opinion.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
    "Pedophiles are the most disgusting form of human on Earth."

    Anti-semite.
    , @TheJester
    One of the first arguments for the total surveillance of the populations of the United States and Great Britain was ...

    "We're looking for pedophiles. Total surveillance is necessary to find these despicable creatures and protect our children."
     
    I suppose that means if the security agencies don't find one, they throw the data away.

    "No, we keep the data just in case we discover after the fact that someone was a pedophile and we need to put together a profile."

     

    The above was the justification by the British government for recording and keeping data on every website visited by everyone in the UK. I recall the same sputterings from Washington DC when G. W. Bush's illegal surveillance programs were exposed post-911. Finding and punishing pedophiles is always the first and fallback position for total surveillance programs.

    P.S. Strange that the British have such problems finding pedophiles given the disposition of their upper class toward homosexuality and pedophilia. Note the investigation into pedophile rings among prime ministers, judges, professors, and other elite in the UK that has gone on since the 1990s without result. Whistleblowers claim that the police were repeatedly ordered to stand down due to national security concerns.

    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vdxbw4/everything-we-know-so-far-about-the-pedophilia-allegations-against-former-uk-prime-minister-edward-heath-804

    The Saker suggests we have the same kind of thing going on in the United States.


    Of course our rulers don’t give a damn about our kids: the only use they have for our kids is to use them in the pedophile sex rings, that’s it (oh yes, while pedophilia is a crime for the commoner, it is a universal status symbol for our masters and overlords; Pizzagate anybody?).
     
    , @JoaoAlfaiate
    "You don’t get to do the proverbial yelling of “Fire!” in a crowded theater when there isn’t one. "

    Yeah and if S 720 passes you'll get seven years in the pen for supporting BDS.
    , @AndrewR
    "By nature, being a pedophile requires an action"

    You don't know what pedophile means. Being a pedophile means having an erotic attraction to prepubescent children. We'll likely never know the real numbers but I imagine the vast majority of pedophiles never commit any illegal acts, just as most men attracted to grown women never commit rape, and most people who have had homicidal fantasies have never killed.

    Someone who engages in sexual acts is a pederast.
    , @Bill

    I am pretty sure I get what The Saker is trying to say.
     
    No, you are one of the propaganda victims he is talking about.
  8. iffen says:

    First They Came for the Nazis and Pedophiles

    Good riddance!

    Articles like this one make me wish they would hurry up and get to people like you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Shahna
    They will.
    And then they will get to you.

    Make no mistake, they aren't interested in some Nazis and pedophiles - are you nuts?
    They're interested in stifling dissent. Nazis and pedophiles is how they get you used to the idea of stifling and how they get the mechanisms in place to make it easy, simple, already a done thing; no debate required - just a little more each time.

    Now it's Nazis and pedophiles, in 6 months time it's The Saker and a year or two from now, it's you.
    It's only by protecting the right of the worst of us to speak today that we can guarantee our own right to speak tomorrow.
  9. DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts.

    Stormfront is something that might be called genuinely neo-nazi. It is serious or thinks it is.

    In contrast, Daily Stormer reads like a sendup of neo-nazism, and one could take it almost as parody,and it may well be in the case of Weev, who I think is mainly in it for the notoriety. As for Anglin, some believe he’s an agent. He could be. He is such a freak. He looks like some mixed-race redneck inbred retard. And yet, and this is what’s strange, he comes across as reasonably intelligent and even thoughtful(if he wants to be). I wish Spencer didn’t stoop to sharing a forum with Anglin, but Anglin can come across as half-intelligent if he tries:

    Because he seems too smart to have such retarded views, some say he must be a FBI agent, a plant. But if he is such, why the clampdown on him? But then, maybe that’s part of the plan. Anglin acts totally outrageous, and his behavior justifies the shutdown, and that is used to shut down other people as well.

    Also, I don’t think most people who went to Daily Stormer went for serious opinions. They just relished the sense of outrage, crank-up of outlandish headlines.

    Still, DS issue is important for free speech. If DS today, what tomorrow? It’s the principle that counts.

    I must take issue with the idea that Nazism was abhorrent. If anything, its problem was a kind of pathological normalism. Nazism showed that excessive and radical attention to health, order, normality, and cleanliness can also be a kind of sickness and perversion. It was excessively anti-septic. In contrast, the problem of something like pedophilia, homomania, and etc is they are excessively septic.

    It’s like it isn’t healthy either to wallow in filth & mud OR be concerned compulsively with purity & cleanliness. Someone who never washes and acts gross is disgusting. But a germ-freak who obsessively-compulsively tries to maintain hygiene and order is also sick. Organism must seek health and order away from mess and chaos, but it must also accept that it too, as a lifeform, is always in a process of growth and decay. Nazism was like life frozen into perfection. It looked good but wasn’t organic.
    You can’t drink frozen milk. Of course, you can’t drink spoiled milk either. Weimar Germany just let the milk of Germany go bad. For milk to turn into useful culture(like yogurt or sour cream), it has to allow certain kinds of germs to grow under certain conditions. That way, milk is both alive as culture and healthy to consume.

    To an extent, elements in Nazism was a healthy reaction to the excesses of Weimar Germany. But then, Nazism, a kind of radical racist Mormonism, went the other extreme and was excessively obsessed with normality, purity, order, beauty, hygiene, and perfection.

    What people need is a kind of humanism that strives for health, order, and normality but also understands that life is, at its core, chaotic, messy, imperfect, and filled with germs. No matter how much one washes, one can only clean the skin, the surface. The body itself if filled with all sorts of bacteria, viruses, and other foreign elements. And there are all sorts of problems of health, emotions, psychology, etc. There is a broad sense of normality, but there is no perfect normal. And even most normal people have tendencies that are abnormal. Humanism urges us to be tolerant and forgiving of imperfections and problems that are inherent to life. Also, abnormality is often the stuff of genius and inspiration in certain individuals.
    But Nazism was so much into normality, beauty, healthy, and striving for perfection that it turned into a kind of perversion in its own right.
    Also, despite the heroic and noble iconography of Nazism with its ‘Aryan’ art and such, the key figures of Nazism were pathological dark-souled individuals like Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, and etc. In a way, radical normality and cult of perfection were crutches for their sense of insecurity, inferiority, and anxiety. Now, it’s okay for people to have anxieties as no one is god or some superhero. Everyone has weaknesses and disadvantages. A smart person can be ugly. A handsome person can be dumb. A beautiful woman can have unpleasant voice, like in SINGING IN THE RAIN. A woman with beautiful voice may not be much of a looker, like those fat broads in opera. But the cretinous leaders of Nazism could never address their own complexes and neuroses and just buried them under the cult of heroism and megalomania. And this repression fueled their neuroses even further.

    Nazism also failed because many sane and sound people with normal dispositions tend to be weak in personality and haven’t the will to step forth and take control. A good example would be Albert Speer. He was essentially a decent man but of weak personality. Not the kind to step forth and take charge of things. Instead, such men let others with stronger personality to take center stage. And they latch onto such figures. (We see this with Neocons and cucks too. Whatever one may say about Jews, they have strong forceful personalities and take charge of power, narrative, and authority. Those with weaker personalities, the Peter Keatings of the world, latch onto forceful Jews. Look at cucks like Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Rich Lowry, Lindsey Graham, and etc. McCain has a temper but no personality. These types only know how to latch onto the Strong personality. And today’s ‘new hitlers’ are the Zionist globalist with a diabolical lust for world control. They got super-chutzpah, and weaker-souled white gentile cucks just go along with stuff like ‘gay marriage’, Russia Hacking hysteria, ‘diversity is our strength’, and homo symbols in christian churches.)
    This was true of Mao and those around him. Mao had a very strong personality, and others latched onto him. Zhou En-Lai was more sensible and more intelligent, but he didn’t have a strong personality. He didn’t know how to take charge. So, the strong personality took charge, and others latched onto him.

    Now, over time, as a system becomes firmly established, there is no more need for strong personalities. Look at China today, and it’s impossible for anyone like Mao to come to power. And USSR after Stalin’s death could no longer tolerate strong personalities. Consensus of Power was what mattered. When Khrushchev was deemed too erratic, they got rid of him, and the system was ruled by a collective politburo. If Nazism had survived, something similar might have happened after Hitler’s death. But Hitler came to power in a world of chaos, and in such a time, a man with forceful personality and magnetism had the clear advantage. And Hitler had it. Normal Germans failed to restore order and balance during the Weimar yrs. They lacked the will, guts, courage, and vision. In contrast, Hitler, for all his deficiencies, had those qualities. And for a time, he restored Germany to its greatness. And if he’d died in 1939, it might have been mostly a happy story for Germany. But he lived on, and his pathological nature simply couldn’t stop gambling with history as the new Man of Destiny. And normal sane Germans like Albert Speer who’d failed during the Weimar yrs also failed by lacking the will to say NO to Hitler. But then, the opponents of Nazism also deserve much blame because they squandered their chance to create a sane healthy democracy during the Weimar yrs. Those yrs were not only economically catastrophic. People can weather material hard times with morale and dignity under inspired leadership. It was the cultural filth and moral collapse of Germany that led to so much anger and frustration, like in SERPENT EGG by Bergman.

    [MORE]

    Obviously, Weimar Germany was culturally sick. Granted, there were genuine artistic achievements in many fields in this period, but society as a whole had lost its bearing, much like Russia in the 90s when it too fell prey to globalists. But instead of combating the disease with national humanism or national spiritualism like Putin did, Hitler and co. pushed for the extreme opposite. IF someone is fat disgusting slob, you try to bring him to health. You don’t try to make him pump iron and swallow tons of vitamins and protein supplements to become invincible Terminator. But then, Nazism was bound to be contradictory as it was a Radical Normal Ideology led by bohemians and eccentrics. Hitler and Goebbels were would-be artists who felt at ease with bohemian lifestyles. And yet, esp Hitler had mostly bourgeois tastes and was a misfit in the modernist cultural milieu. Hitler’s bohemianism felt at odds with respectable society, but his taste for beauty and form made him a misfit among modernism then in rage. If Nazi leaders had been more honest about their own contradictions, they might have found ways to resolve them. But they repressed them and played the role of transcendent visionary saviors of the nation. And so, their complexes fueled their madness further. In a way, their excessive radical normalism was a desperate way to repress their anxieties and neuroses that were more in tune with modernity. Though MAX isn’t a very good movie, it does touch on the contradiction of Hitlerism, a 19th century bohemian romantic sensibility trapped in the world of modernity.

    An eccentric man too discomfited with his obvious strangeness and unable to confront his own demons, thereby seeking escapism in mythic heroism of history as a grand opera. Hitler couldn’t confront his demons so he turned them into avenging angels.

    As for pornography, I think it’s made all the worse by homomania. Because homos have been sacralized, we aren’t supposed to say negative things about dangerous practice of fecal penetration that greatly increases the likelihood of anal cancer. So, it’s spread to real-sexual people too. Also, with pornographic images being so ubiquitous, people need extra kink to get excited. Also, with Negro men increasingly conquering white vaginas, white guys feel a need to feel power over women by some ‘extreme’ act, and that is bungholery. Since there’s a good chance that the vagina of some white ‘thot’ has already been taken by a Negro, the only way a white guy can act like he’s conquering the white female is by violating her bungy.

    But far more problematic than porn itself is the pornification of culture, i.e. the barrier that used to exist between porn and rest of culture is rapidly dissolving. Ariana Grande is supposed to be entertainment for young girls, and yet her songs are totally porny. When 10 yr old girls are allowed to attend her concert by her parents, pornification is seeping down to children. And if kids are thus sexualized, doesn’t it essentially normalize pedophilia, at least step by step? If pornified pop culture is suitable for kids, it means kids are sexual creatures. If so, why shouldn’t they engage in sex? Furthermore, if even elementary school kids are taught about ass-buggery, won’t young boys think, “it’s okay to have pee pee in my poo poo?” If adults allow young kids to think like this, pedophilia will gradually become normalized.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Michelle
    I can see from your comment that you have a lot on your mind. After reading your comment, I have a lot on my mind.
    , @Alden
    You need to lay off the meth. Your post reminds me of Jack Kerouac's style.
    , @Seraphim
    Well said.
    Wouldn't you think that at the bottom of the 'perversions' of Nazism, Communism, Greenism is the same utopian desire to build the 'Kingdom of God' on earth, an impossibility by definition? Striving after wind ("And I set my mind to seek and explore by wisdom concerning all that has been done under heaven. It is a grievous task which God has given to the sons of men to be afflicted with. 14I have seen all the works which have been done under the sun, and behold, all is vanity and striving after wind. 15What is crooked cannot be straightened and what is lacking cannot be counted.…" - Eccl. 1:13-15)?
    , @Wally
    Oh Yawn.

    Feeble try, but no cigar.

    You're right out of Zionist Wm. Shirer's grade school play book.
    'Soap made from Jews', 'human skin lampshades', and the whole laughable bit.

    IOW, you talk a lot, but ultimately are just another of the conditioned lemmings.


    "One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one."

    - signed by 34 "reputable historians" and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979
     

    Simply stated, there were the ‘Nazis’ with the impossible '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the 'holocaust' scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    , @SMK
    The Indian wars and ultimate defeat and dispossession of 3-3.5 million stone-age savages and cannibals -necessary for whites to settle the continent and create the United States- was a "unique" act of "genocide" worse than the Holocaust and the murders and killings of over a 100 million people by communists!
    , @Stonehands
    "...DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts."


    It is a simple and brutal fact of life that the average American is a functional illiterate with the attention span of a house fly.

    They have been engineered that way by the same people who are the primary subject matter of the DAILY STORMER, (largely as a matter of their own self- defense) to make sure that they will never be able to read and
    understand books such as 200 Years
    Together by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
    .


    Even if he or she desires to read Solzhenitsyns great work ( It is de facto banned in the U.S.) any American born after about 1980 and who went to a public school will have difficulty in reading a long block of text for content, because it is a skill no longer taught to American school children; the public educational system now relies almost entirely on electronic screens and moving images.

    It quite literally hurts younger peoples heads to make the attempt!

    Through memes and humor DS publisher Andrew Anglin took center stage among this cohort- the "maul"right, generation Z(yclon).

    No virtue signalling here, Anglin made white- ethno National Socialism "cool" and "squared away"- as opposed to the cuck libertarians; like that stoner "what's Allepo?" guy...

    The average Joe has to be made to understand, somehow, if there is to be any hope for any kind of a livable future, that the same people who won't publish one of the greatest writers of the 20th century are the same cabal that has declared that White cohesion is racist and uniquely evil.

  10. I’m not entirely sure what to make of this article, but my general opinion is that Saker is focusing on the wrong aspects of the overall situation.

    As far as these huge internet technopolies go (e.g. Facebook, Google, Youtube), I believe that they will be defunct in 5 to 10 years anyway, along with most of what we currently call the internet. The world is visibly marching towards an extreme day of economic reckoning and massive military escalation. Tech companies, which are basically profitless, cash-burning furnaces that produce nothing of value and are strategic liabilities given the ease of electronic espionage and cyber-attacks, are simply not going to survive the fin de siecle. The social mood will turn against their whole twerpy, metrosexual elan, and the trade wars with China will spell an end to the importation of cheap electronics from the sweatshops of the East. When the next iPhone costs $3500 and comes with a mandatory social justice speech code, most Americans will find that they do not want one, nor will they be able to afford one.

    It is wrong to look at the current de-platforming solely in the context of “free speech.” Free speech, which has never existed in fact, is simply a catchword regularly employed by anyone wishing to challenge the reigning authorities. As a Traditional Catholic, I hold to the adage that “error has no rights.” Therefore I am not in principle opposed to placing limits on what can be said in public. The battle of ideas, which is a battle in the metaphorical sense only, must eventually become an an actual battle of arrayed forces, factions, tactics, subterfuge, and violence. This is where we are today. The divisions throughout Western society are both real and deep and vitally consequential; they can no longer be papered over by the illusion of a common polity, nor held in check by imperial force. One part of the mass insanity currently gripping the West is the delusion that meaningless concepts like social justice, racial equality, and technological innovation actually matter in the long run, that they have some substantive reality about them. That delusion is about to be dispelled.

    The crackdown by tech companies on unapproved speech is only a footnote in the larger story. It is important in the immediate present, but it will soon be swept away by broader trends. This is not yet the Civil War; it is not even Fort Sumter; it is the preliminary spray of flysheets and grandstanding before the situation turns serious. But it must be remembered that the war is coming. The age of compromise is at an end.

    Read More
    • Agree: Bill
    • Replies: @yeah
    You make some very interesting points and I salute you for your bravery in outright heresy. However, I fear you may be wrong, even as a part of me is equally sick and tired of what has come to be regarded as "Progress".

    If times do indeed turn towards major war and destruction, it is not just the IT world and its social media culture that will take a hit. Everything will collapse, 99% of everything that can be traced back to the industrial revolution. Short of that, social media and its culture of banality, self-absorption, and devotion to the flim-flams and gizmos of technology will survive. Facebook is not just a company or a product, it has become "Life" itself, and is Soma for alienated minds.

    The dogmas of political correctness and the obsessions with gender and identity are beasts that have to be fought apart and separate from the struggle for a better balance in free speech. Reason and Logic will have to be rediscovered and reintroduced into public discourse. If that human quest succeeds, obsessive and juvenile infatuations with social media, identity politics and the like will evaporate on their own.
  11. Readers includng The Saker should be aware that there was another case of censorship as egregious and sinister if not more that occurred several months ago.

    The details can be easily found in an internet search, but I will relate what details I know and you may, if you wish, fill in with your own research.

    A music group calle PWR BTM, which (I think) consists of 2 gay guys, had some album success and performance success. A woman accused one of the members of the band of some kind of sex harassment (or worse, not sure), I believe on Facebook initially. This claim was never charged by an law enforcement entity and there also was never any civil suit filed.

    But this was enough that all of their songs were removed from Spotify, Beats, the iTunes store, and their record distributor dropped them and erased their catalog.

    The music sites that I read on this story were almost all unversally proud of the censorshp, because “we” don’t support sexual “predators.”

    To say that this is “chilling” would be an understatement.

    I have seen exactly one article protesting this sinister act of censorship.

    You article is a good article. I think the only thing that will save us and save the internet at this point in time is if a new de-centralized paradigm is somehow given birth (Kim Dotcom has hinted that is what he and his team are working on) that makes it impossible for anyone to control what people say and do on the internet.

    If no one controls the servers, then the internet (and people) will be free once again.

    Time will tell.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    Interesting story about the destruction of the musicians career by an unsubstantiated claim in Facebook.

    Probably she came on to him, he turned her down so she posted her story and destroyed her career. People are evil.
  12. nsa says:

    The jooies own the fed government, the media especially ziovision, the federal judiciary, the banking system including the central bank, many of the largest corporations (goog, fakebook, etc)…….so of course they are going to hammer the handful of post modern self-identified nazis. For all anyone knows, DailyStormer and StormFront are jooie (or secret police) projects designed to create virtual enemies and societal tension. Think this is far fetched? Drudge and Breitbart are jooie owned neocon sites……and yes, even Unz could be just another disinfo propaganda innoculation site. ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE IN THIS AGE OF TOTAL DECEIPT.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Intelligent Dasein
    I am beginning to entertain such suspicions as well. The whole "Unite the Right" rally is looking ever more like one vast psy-op, and The Daily Stormer was instrumental in its organization.
    , @utu
    DailyStormer and StormFront are jooie (or secret police) projects designed to create virtual enemies and societal tension.

    I do not have a proof I know it can't be otherwise.

    Drudge and Breitbart are jooie owned neocon sites

    This should be obvious to everybody.
  13. @nsa
    The jooies own the fed government, the media especially ziovision, the federal judiciary, the banking system including the central bank, many of the largest corporations (goog, fakebook, etc).......so of course they are going to hammer the handful of post modern self-identified nazis. For all anyone knows, DailyStormer and StormFront are jooie (or secret police) projects designed to create virtual enemies and societal tension. Think this is far fetched? Drudge and Breitbart are jooie owned neocon sites......and yes, even Unz could be just another disinfo propaganda innoculation site. ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE IN THIS AGE OF TOTAL DECEIPT.

    I am beginning to entertain such suspicions as well. The whole “Unite the Right” rally is looking ever more like one vast psy-op, and The Daily Stormer was instrumental in its organization.

    Read More
  14. Thanks, Saker, for the shout out to us libertarians. I’d like to point out that even though we support the rights of companies to set their own policies, it doesn’t mean we support said policies. And certainly much of the concentration of monopoly power is due to government policy. For this reason, I support the breakup of the big banks even though they’re private entities.

    Read More
  15. Technomad says:

    Whenever someone starts screaming about “pedophiles,” I want to know what age-range they’re talking about. A two-year-old is not a five-year-old is not a ten-year-old is not a thirteen-year-old is not a seventeen-year-old.

    And it has occurred to me that the “OMG PEDOPHILIA!!!” hysteria could be used to destroy anybody. All that would be needed would be access to the target’s computers and a file of whatever constitutes “child pornography” these days by a reasonably-skilled computer technician. Once those images are found on the target’s hard drive, it’s all over but the lynching.

    One thing I have always wondered is why “white nationalists” or “white supremacists” have any time at all for the Nazis. They killed more white people than almost anybody. Poles are white! Slavs are white! Adolf Hitler was a German nationalist, first, last, and all the time. There were huge chunks of the white race he wanted to see extinct.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Alden
    And Poles are a lot blonder and bluer than the Germans and a bit taller too.

    Hitler was a loser who lost a war and gave half of Europe to the Soviet Union.
    , @Avery
    {One thing I have always wondered is why “white nationalists” or “white supremacists” have any time at all for the Nazis. They killed more white people than almost anybody. Poles are white! Slavs are white! Adolf Hitler was a German nationalist, first, last, and all the time. There were huge chunks of the white race he wanted to see extinct.}

    Well said.
    , @utu
    “OMG PEDOPHILIA!!!” was created exactly for control and new means of attack. It produced tangible results like putting Catholic Church were they wanted it to be? Any anti-war statements from Catholic bishops recently?
    , @Bill
    Skill is not especially necessary. If the police haul away your computer and then later say in court that they found child pornography on it, then you are cooked. Is thinking that the police lie about such things a conspiracy theory? Well, the FBI lab lied for years about forensic evidence.
  16. Michelle says:
    @Priss Factor
    DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts.

    Stormfront is something that might be called genuinely neo-nazi. It is serious or thinks it is.

    In contrast, Daily Stormer reads like a sendup of neo-nazism, and one could take it almost as parody,and it may well be in the case of Weev, who I think is mainly in it for the notoriety. As for Anglin, some believe he's an agent. He could be. He is such a freak. He looks like some mixed-race redneck inbred retard. And yet, and this is what's strange, he comes across as reasonably intelligent and even thoughtful(if he wants to be). I wish Spencer didn't stoop to sharing a forum with Anglin, but Anglin can come across as half-intelligent if he tries:

    https://youtu.be/Rm-AIZib0io?t=11m40s

    Because he seems too smart to have such retarded views, some say he must be a FBI agent, a plant. But if he is such, why the clampdown on him? But then, maybe that's part of the plan. Anglin acts totally outrageous, and his behavior justifies the shutdown, and that is used to shut down other people as well.

    Also, I don't think most people who went to Daily Stormer went for serious opinions. They just relished the sense of outrage, crank-up of outlandish headlines.

    Still, DS issue is important for free speech. If DS today, what tomorrow? It's the principle that counts.

    I must take issue with the idea that Nazism was abhorrent. If anything, its problem was a kind of pathological normalism. Nazism showed that excessive and radical attention to health, order, normality, and cleanliness can also be a kind of sickness and perversion. It was excessively anti-septic. In contrast, the problem of something like pedophilia, homomania, and etc is they are excessively septic.

    It's like it isn't healthy either to wallow in filth & mud OR be concerned compulsively with purity & cleanliness. Someone who never washes and acts gross is disgusting. But a germ-freak who obsessively-compulsively tries to maintain hygiene and order is also sick. Organism must seek health and order away from mess and chaos, but it must also accept that it too, as a lifeform, is always in a process of growth and decay. Nazism was like life frozen into perfection. It looked good but wasn't organic.
    You can't drink frozen milk. Of course, you can't drink spoiled milk either. Weimar Germany just let the milk of Germany go bad. For milk to turn into useful culture(like yogurt or sour cream), it has to allow certain kinds of germs to grow under certain conditions. That way, milk is both alive as culture and healthy to consume.

    To an extent, elements in Nazism was a healthy reaction to the excesses of Weimar Germany. But then, Nazism, a kind of radical racist Mormonism, went the other extreme and was excessively obsessed with normality, purity, order, beauty, hygiene, and perfection.

    What people need is a kind of humanism that strives for health, order, and normality but also understands that life is, at its core, chaotic, messy, imperfect, and filled with germs. No matter how much one washes, one can only clean the skin, the surface. The body itself if filled with all sorts of bacteria, viruses, and other foreign elements. And there are all sorts of problems of health, emotions, psychology, etc. There is a broad sense of normality, but there is no perfect normal. And even most normal people have tendencies that are abnormal. Humanism urges us to be tolerant and forgiving of imperfections and problems that are inherent to life. Also, abnormality is often the stuff of genius and inspiration in certain individuals.
    But Nazism was so much into normality, beauty, healthy, and striving for perfection that it turned into a kind of perversion in its own right.
    Also, despite the heroic and noble iconography of Nazism with its 'Aryan' art and such, the key figures of Nazism were pathological dark-souled individuals like Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, and etc. In a way, radical normality and cult of perfection were crutches for their sense of insecurity, inferiority, and anxiety. Now, it's okay for people to have anxieties as no one is god or some superhero. Everyone has weaknesses and disadvantages. A smart person can be ugly. A handsome person can be dumb. A beautiful woman can have unpleasant voice, like in SINGING IN THE RAIN. A woman with beautiful voice may not be much of a looker, like those fat broads in opera. But the cretinous leaders of Nazism could never address their own complexes and neuroses and just buried them under the cult of heroism and megalomania. And this repression fueled their neuroses even further.

    Nazism also failed because many sane and sound people with normal dispositions tend to be weak in personality and haven't the will to step forth and take control. A good example would be Albert Speer. He was essentially a decent man but of weak personality. Not the kind to step forth and take charge of things. Instead, such men let others with stronger personality to take center stage. And they latch onto such figures. (We see this with Neocons and cucks too. Whatever one may say about Jews, they have strong forceful personalities and take charge of power, narrative, and authority. Those with weaker personalities, the Peter Keatings of the world, latch onto forceful Jews. Look at cucks like Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Rich Lowry, Lindsey Graham, and etc. McCain has a temper but no personality. These types only know how to latch onto the Strong personality. And today's 'new hitlers' are the Zionist globalist with a diabolical lust for world control. They got super-chutzpah, and weaker-souled white gentile cucks just go along with stuff like 'gay marriage', Russia Hacking hysteria, 'diversity is our strength', and homo symbols in christian churches.)
    This was true of Mao and those around him. Mao had a very strong personality, and others latched onto him. Zhou En-Lai was more sensible and more intelligent, but he didn't have a strong personality. He didn't know how to take charge. So, the strong personality took charge, and others latched onto him.

    Now, over time, as a system becomes firmly established, there is no more need for strong personalities. Look at China today, and it's impossible for anyone like Mao to come to power. And USSR after Stalin's death could no longer tolerate strong personalities. Consensus of Power was what mattered. When Khrushchev was deemed too erratic, they got rid of him, and the system was ruled by a collective politburo. If Nazism had survived, something similar might have happened after Hitler's death. But Hitler came to power in a world of chaos, and in such a time, a man with forceful personality and magnetism had the clear advantage. And Hitler had it. Normal Germans failed to restore order and balance during the Weimar yrs. They lacked the will, guts, courage, and vision. In contrast, Hitler, for all his deficiencies, had those qualities. And for a time, he restored Germany to its greatness. And if he'd died in 1939, it might have been mostly a happy story for Germany. But he lived on, and his pathological nature simply couldn't stop gambling with history as the new Man of Destiny. And normal sane Germans like Albert Speer who'd failed during the Weimar yrs also failed by lacking the will to say NO to Hitler. But then, the opponents of Nazism also deserve much blame because they squandered their chance to create a sane healthy democracy during the Weimar yrs. Those yrs were not only economically catastrophic. People can weather material hard times with morale and dignity under inspired leadership. It was the cultural filth and moral collapse of Germany that led to so much anger and frustration, like in SERPENT EGG by Bergman.

    https://youtu.be/R2nIe1G6R1s?t=7m16s

    https://youtu.be/rAB2qGdh_lY?t=13m22s

    Obviously, Weimar Germany was culturally sick. Granted, there were genuine artistic achievements in many fields in this period, but society as a whole had lost its bearing, much like Russia in the 90s when it too fell prey to globalists. But instead of combating the disease with national humanism or national spiritualism like Putin did, Hitler and co. pushed for the extreme opposite. IF someone is fat disgusting slob, you try to bring him to health. You don't try to make him pump iron and swallow tons of vitamins and protein supplements to become invincible Terminator. But then, Nazism was bound to be contradictory as it was a Radical Normal Ideology led by bohemians and eccentrics. Hitler and Goebbels were would-be artists who felt at ease with bohemian lifestyles. And yet, esp Hitler had mostly bourgeois tastes and was a misfit in the modernist cultural milieu. Hitler's bohemianism felt at odds with respectable society, but his taste for beauty and form made him a misfit among modernism then in rage. If Nazi leaders had been more honest about their own contradictions, they might have found ways to resolve them. But they repressed them and played the role of transcendent visionary saviors of the nation. And so, their complexes fueled their madness further. In a way, their excessive radical normalism was a desperate way to repress their anxieties and neuroses that were more in tune with modernity. Though MAX isn't a very good movie, it does touch on the contradiction of Hitlerism, a 19th century bohemian romantic sensibility trapped in the world of modernity.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jrs7qk503Y

    An eccentric man too discomfited with his obvious strangeness and unable to confront his own demons, thereby seeking escapism in mythic heroism of history as a grand opera. Hitler couldn't confront his demons so he turned them into avenging angels.

    As for pornography, I think it's made all the worse by homomania. Because homos have been sacralized, we aren't supposed to say negative things about dangerous practice of fecal penetration that greatly increases the likelihood of anal cancer. So, it's spread to real-sexual people too. Also, with pornographic images being so ubiquitous, people need extra kink to get excited. Also, with Negro men increasingly conquering white vaginas, white guys feel a need to feel power over women by some 'extreme' act, and that is bungholery. Since there's a good chance that the vagina of some white 'thot' has already been taken by a Negro, the only way a white guy can act like he's conquering the white female is by violating her bungy.

    But far more problematic than porn itself is the pornification of culture, i.e. the barrier that used to exist between porn and rest of culture is rapidly dissolving. Ariana Grande is supposed to be entertainment for young girls, and yet her songs are totally porny. When 10 yr old girls are allowed to attend her concert by her parents, pornification is seeping down to children. And if kids are thus sexualized, doesn't it essentially normalize pedophilia, at least step by step? If pornified pop culture is suitable for kids, it means kids are sexual creatures. If so, why shouldn't they engage in sex? Furthermore, if even elementary school kids are taught about ass-buggery, won't young boys think, "it's okay to have pee pee in my poo poo?" If adults allow young kids to think like this, pedophilia will gradually become normalized.

    I can see from your comment that you have a lot on your mind. After reading your comment, I have a lot on my mind.

    Read More
  17. Alden says:
    @restless94110
    Readers includng The Saker should be aware that there was another case of censorship as egregious and sinister if not more that occurred several months ago.

    The details can be easily found in an internet search, but I will relate what details I know and you may, if you wish, fill in with your own research.

    A music group calle PWR BTM, which (I think) consists of 2 gay guys, had some album success and performance success. A woman accused one of the members of the band of some kind of sex harassment (or worse, not sure), I believe on Facebook initially. This claim was never charged by an law enforcement entity and there also was never any civil suit filed.

    But this was enough that all of their songs were removed from Spotify, Beats, the iTunes store, and their record distributor dropped them and erased their catalog.

    The music sites that I read on this story were almost all unversally proud of the censorshp, because "we" don't support sexual "predators."

    To say that this is "chilling" would be an understatement.

    I have seen exactly one article protesting this sinister act of censorship.

    You article is a good article. I think the only thing that will save us and save the internet at this point in time is if a new de-centralized paradigm is somehow given birth (Kim Dotcom has hinted that is what he and his team are working on) that makes it impossible for anyone to control what people say and do on the internet.

    If no one controls the servers, then the internet (and people) will be free once again.

    Time will tell.

    Interesting story about the destruction of the musicians career by an unsubstantiated claim in Facebook.

    Probably she came on to him, he turned her down so she posted her story and destroyed her career. People are evil.

    Read More
    • Replies: @restless94110
    No one, man or woman, should be able to do such a thing.

    The reason? You provided it. People are evil. Don't let them take freedom of expression away.
  18. utu says:

    not because they are bad (which they, of course, are!) but because they are both easy, almost defenseless, targets and ideal ‘consensus villains’

    You forgot about the smokers as the ideal ‘consensus villains’.

    Read More
  19. Alden says:
    @Technomad
    Whenever someone starts screaming about "pedophiles," I want to know what age-range they're talking about. A two-year-old is not a five-year-old is not a ten-year-old is not a thirteen-year-old is not a seventeen-year-old.

    And it has occurred to me that the "OMG PEDOPHILIA!!!" hysteria could be used to destroy anybody. All that would be needed would be access to the target's computers and a file of whatever constitutes "child pornography" these days by a reasonably-skilled computer technician. Once those images are found on the target's hard drive, it's all over but the lynching.

    One thing I have always wondered is why "white nationalists" or "white supremacists" have any time at all for the Nazis. They killed more white people than almost anybody. Poles are white! Slavs are white! Adolf Hitler was a German nationalist, first, last, and all the time. There were huge chunks of the white race he wanted to see extinct.

    And Poles are a lot blonder and bluer than the Germans and a bit taller too.

    Hitler was a loser who lost a war and gave half of Europe to the Soviet Union.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    {Hitler was a loser who lost a war and gave half of Europe to the Soviet Union.}

    The parts of Europe that were under Soviet rule - e.g. Poland, Hungary, etc - are the only European countries that today are actively resisting Globalist EU's attempts to forcibly Islamize them.

    Probably because the 70 years of Soviet rule prevented their populations from being Sorosabrainwashed, lobotomized, and infected by various viruses of the Neocon/Globalist West.


    [Poland to Muslims: " Here, Jesus is our King, so get out "]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_BjPy19bYs

    Can you imagine such a march in any Western European country?
    Maybe Eastern Europeans will actually come out the winners in the long run.
    They will maintain their unique cultures and nationalities.
    They will remain Christians.
  20. Alden says:
    @Priss Factor
    DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts.

    Stormfront is something that might be called genuinely neo-nazi. It is serious or thinks it is.

    In contrast, Daily Stormer reads like a sendup of neo-nazism, and one could take it almost as parody,and it may well be in the case of Weev, who I think is mainly in it for the notoriety. As for Anglin, some believe he's an agent. He could be. He is such a freak. He looks like some mixed-race redneck inbred retard. And yet, and this is what's strange, he comes across as reasonably intelligent and even thoughtful(if he wants to be). I wish Spencer didn't stoop to sharing a forum with Anglin, but Anglin can come across as half-intelligent if he tries:

    https://youtu.be/Rm-AIZib0io?t=11m40s

    Because he seems too smart to have such retarded views, some say he must be a FBI agent, a plant. But if he is such, why the clampdown on him? But then, maybe that's part of the plan. Anglin acts totally outrageous, and his behavior justifies the shutdown, and that is used to shut down other people as well.

    Also, I don't think most people who went to Daily Stormer went for serious opinions. They just relished the sense of outrage, crank-up of outlandish headlines.

    Still, DS issue is important for free speech. If DS today, what tomorrow? It's the principle that counts.

    I must take issue with the idea that Nazism was abhorrent. If anything, its problem was a kind of pathological normalism. Nazism showed that excessive and radical attention to health, order, normality, and cleanliness can also be a kind of sickness and perversion. It was excessively anti-septic. In contrast, the problem of something like pedophilia, homomania, and etc is they are excessively septic.

    It's like it isn't healthy either to wallow in filth & mud OR be concerned compulsively with purity & cleanliness. Someone who never washes and acts gross is disgusting. But a germ-freak who obsessively-compulsively tries to maintain hygiene and order is also sick. Organism must seek health and order away from mess and chaos, but it must also accept that it too, as a lifeform, is always in a process of growth and decay. Nazism was like life frozen into perfection. It looked good but wasn't organic.
    You can't drink frozen milk. Of course, you can't drink spoiled milk either. Weimar Germany just let the milk of Germany go bad. For milk to turn into useful culture(like yogurt or sour cream), it has to allow certain kinds of germs to grow under certain conditions. That way, milk is both alive as culture and healthy to consume.

    To an extent, elements in Nazism was a healthy reaction to the excesses of Weimar Germany. But then, Nazism, a kind of radical racist Mormonism, went the other extreme and was excessively obsessed with normality, purity, order, beauty, hygiene, and perfection.

    What people need is a kind of humanism that strives for health, order, and normality but also understands that life is, at its core, chaotic, messy, imperfect, and filled with germs. No matter how much one washes, one can only clean the skin, the surface. The body itself if filled with all sorts of bacteria, viruses, and other foreign elements. And there are all sorts of problems of health, emotions, psychology, etc. There is a broad sense of normality, but there is no perfect normal. And even most normal people have tendencies that are abnormal. Humanism urges us to be tolerant and forgiving of imperfections and problems that are inherent to life. Also, abnormality is often the stuff of genius and inspiration in certain individuals.
    But Nazism was so much into normality, beauty, healthy, and striving for perfection that it turned into a kind of perversion in its own right.
    Also, despite the heroic and noble iconography of Nazism with its 'Aryan' art and such, the key figures of Nazism were pathological dark-souled individuals like Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, and etc. In a way, radical normality and cult of perfection were crutches for their sense of insecurity, inferiority, and anxiety. Now, it's okay for people to have anxieties as no one is god or some superhero. Everyone has weaknesses and disadvantages. A smart person can be ugly. A handsome person can be dumb. A beautiful woman can have unpleasant voice, like in SINGING IN THE RAIN. A woman with beautiful voice may not be much of a looker, like those fat broads in opera. But the cretinous leaders of Nazism could never address their own complexes and neuroses and just buried them under the cult of heroism and megalomania. And this repression fueled their neuroses even further.

    Nazism also failed because many sane and sound people with normal dispositions tend to be weak in personality and haven't the will to step forth and take control. A good example would be Albert Speer. He was essentially a decent man but of weak personality. Not the kind to step forth and take charge of things. Instead, such men let others with stronger personality to take center stage. And they latch onto such figures. (We see this with Neocons and cucks too. Whatever one may say about Jews, they have strong forceful personalities and take charge of power, narrative, and authority. Those with weaker personalities, the Peter Keatings of the world, latch onto forceful Jews. Look at cucks like Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Rich Lowry, Lindsey Graham, and etc. McCain has a temper but no personality. These types only know how to latch onto the Strong personality. And today's 'new hitlers' are the Zionist globalist with a diabolical lust for world control. They got super-chutzpah, and weaker-souled white gentile cucks just go along with stuff like 'gay marriage', Russia Hacking hysteria, 'diversity is our strength', and homo symbols in christian churches.)
    This was true of Mao and those around him. Mao had a very strong personality, and others latched onto him. Zhou En-Lai was more sensible and more intelligent, but he didn't have a strong personality. He didn't know how to take charge. So, the strong personality took charge, and others latched onto him.

    Now, over time, as a system becomes firmly established, there is no more need for strong personalities. Look at China today, and it's impossible for anyone like Mao to come to power. And USSR after Stalin's death could no longer tolerate strong personalities. Consensus of Power was what mattered. When Khrushchev was deemed too erratic, they got rid of him, and the system was ruled by a collective politburo. If Nazism had survived, something similar might have happened after Hitler's death. But Hitler came to power in a world of chaos, and in such a time, a man with forceful personality and magnetism had the clear advantage. And Hitler had it. Normal Germans failed to restore order and balance during the Weimar yrs. They lacked the will, guts, courage, and vision. In contrast, Hitler, for all his deficiencies, had those qualities. And for a time, he restored Germany to its greatness. And if he'd died in 1939, it might have been mostly a happy story for Germany. But he lived on, and his pathological nature simply couldn't stop gambling with history as the new Man of Destiny. And normal sane Germans like Albert Speer who'd failed during the Weimar yrs also failed by lacking the will to say NO to Hitler. But then, the opponents of Nazism also deserve much blame because they squandered their chance to create a sane healthy democracy during the Weimar yrs. Those yrs were not only economically catastrophic. People can weather material hard times with morale and dignity under inspired leadership. It was the cultural filth and moral collapse of Germany that led to so much anger and frustration, like in SERPENT EGG by Bergman.

    https://youtu.be/R2nIe1G6R1s?t=7m16s

    https://youtu.be/rAB2qGdh_lY?t=13m22s

    Obviously, Weimar Germany was culturally sick. Granted, there were genuine artistic achievements in many fields in this period, but society as a whole had lost its bearing, much like Russia in the 90s when it too fell prey to globalists. But instead of combating the disease with national humanism or national spiritualism like Putin did, Hitler and co. pushed for the extreme opposite. IF someone is fat disgusting slob, you try to bring him to health. You don't try to make him pump iron and swallow tons of vitamins and protein supplements to become invincible Terminator. But then, Nazism was bound to be contradictory as it was a Radical Normal Ideology led by bohemians and eccentrics. Hitler and Goebbels were would-be artists who felt at ease with bohemian lifestyles. And yet, esp Hitler had mostly bourgeois tastes and was a misfit in the modernist cultural milieu. Hitler's bohemianism felt at odds with respectable society, but his taste for beauty and form made him a misfit among modernism then in rage. If Nazi leaders had been more honest about their own contradictions, they might have found ways to resolve them. But they repressed them and played the role of transcendent visionary saviors of the nation. And so, their complexes fueled their madness further. In a way, their excessive radical normalism was a desperate way to repress their anxieties and neuroses that were more in tune with modernity. Though MAX isn't a very good movie, it does touch on the contradiction of Hitlerism, a 19th century bohemian romantic sensibility trapped in the world of modernity.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jrs7qk503Y

    An eccentric man too discomfited with his obvious strangeness and unable to confront his own demons, thereby seeking escapism in mythic heroism of history as a grand opera. Hitler couldn't confront his demons so he turned them into avenging angels.

    As for pornography, I think it's made all the worse by homomania. Because homos have been sacralized, we aren't supposed to say negative things about dangerous practice of fecal penetration that greatly increases the likelihood of anal cancer. So, it's spread to real-sexual people too. Also, with pornographic images being so ubiquitous, people need extra kink to get excited. Also, with Negro men increasingly conquering white vaginas, white guys feel a need to feel power over women by some 'extreme' act, and that is bungholery. Since there's a good chance that the vagina of some white 'thot' has already been taken by a Negro, the only way a white guy can act like he's conquering the white female is by violating her bungy.

    But far more problematic than porn itself is the pornification of culture, i.e. the barrier that used to exist between porn and rest of culture is rapidly dissolving. Ariana Grande is supposed to be entertainment for young girls, and yet her songs are totally porny. When 10 yr old girls are allowed to attend her concert by her parents, pornification is seeping down to children. And if kids are thus sexualized, doesn't it essentially normalize pedophilia, at least step by step? If pornified pop culture is suitable for kids, it means kids are sexual creatures. If so, why shouldn't they engage in sex? Furthermore, if even elementary school kids are taught about ass-buggery, won't young boys think, "it's okay to have pee pee in my poo poo?" If adults allow young kids to think like this, pedophilia will gradually become normalized.

    You need to lay off the meth. Your post reminds me of Jack Kerouac’s style.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    Not just the meth but the mandingos as well ... it's a deadly combo!
  21. utu says:
    @nsa
    The jooies own the fed government, the media especially ziovision, the federal judiciary, the banking system including the central bank, many of the largest corporations (goog, fakebook, etc).......so of course they are going to hammer the handful of post modern self-identified nazis. For all anyone knows, DailyStormer and StormFront are jooie (or secret police) projects designed to create virtual enemies and societal tension. Think this is far fetched? Drudge and Breitbart are jooie owned neocon sites......and yes, even Unz could be just another disinfo propaganda innoculation site. ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE IN THIS AGE OF TOTAL DECEIPT.

    DailyStormer and StormFront are jooie (or secret police) projects designed to create virtual enemies and societal tension.

    I do not have a proof I know it can’t be otherwise.

    Drudge and Breitbart are jooie owned neocon sites

    This should be obvious to everybody.

    Read More
  22. Avery says:
    @Technomad
    Whenever someone starts screaming about "pedophiles," I want to know what age-range they're talking about. A two-year-old is not a five-year-old is not a ten-year-old is not a thirteen-year-old is not a seventeen-year-old.

    And it has occurred to me that the "OMG PEDOPHILIA!!!" hysteria could be used to destroy anybody. All that would be needed would be access to the target's computers and a file of whatever constitutes "child pornography" these days by a reasonably-skilled computer technician. Once those images are found on the target's hard drive, it's all over but the lynching.

    One thing I have always wondered is why "white nationalists" or "white supremacists" have any time at all for the Nazis. They killed more white people than almost anybody. Poles are white! Slavs are white! Adolf Hitler was a German nationalist, first, last, and all the time. There were huge chunks of the white race he wanted to see extinct.

    {One thing I have always wondered is why “white nationalists” or “white supremacists” have any time at all for the Nazis. They killed more white people than almost anybody. Poles are white! Slavs are white! Adolf Hitler was a German nationalist, first, last, and all the time. There were huge chunks of the white race he wanted to see extinct.}

    Well said.

    Read More
  23. utu says:
    @Technomad
    Whenever someone starts screaming about "pedophiles," I want to know what age-range they're talking about. A two-year-old is not a five-year-old is not a ten-year-old is not a thirteen-year-old is not a seventeen-year-old.

    And it has occurred to me that the "OMG PEDOPHILIA!!!" hysteria could be used to destroy anybody. All that would be needed would be access to the target's computers and a file of whatever constitutes "child pornography" these days by a reasonably-skilled computer technician. Once those images are found on the target's hard drive, it's all over but the lynching.

    One thing I have always wondered is why "white nationalists" or "white supremacists" have any time at all for the Nazis. They killed more white people than almost anybody. Poles are white! Slavs are white! Adolf Hitler was a German nationalist, first, last, and all the time. There were huge chunks of the white race he wanted to see extinct.

    “OMG PEDOPHILIA!!!” was created exactly for control and new means of attack. It produced tangible results like putting Catholic Church were they wanted it to be? Any anti-war statements from Catholic bishops recently?

    Read More
  24. peterAUS says:

    Agree with most of the article.

    Slightly disagree with “what to do”. Just don’t think it’s important to have an Internet presence to disseminate thoughts and ideas. As said in one of other article comments by somebody else, all that has to be said has already been said. All material already exists…….
    If THEY shut down “alternative” Internet now they can’t erase all that information.
    I, actually, believe it would be even beneficial. It would filter out lazy and feckless. True persons WOULD find ways to get informed and communicate with peers.
    And it would mean THEY are getting really nervous, meaning things are really, in real world, getting worse and the unthinking masses are getting truly unhappy.
    Just a personal example…when I want to REALLY talk about something, say, “sensitive”, I do it in person or over encrypted email.
    True persons would just need to up their communication game a bit in a real world receptive for the change.

    In essence, things SHOULD get worse before there is a possibility for a meaningful change.

    It’s another thing, of course, who will seize that opportunity.

    Read More
  25. The article is far too long, I just read the beginning.
    But nevertheless I can make a comment, how great internet is in demonstrating that the majority of mankind, judging from the written reactions, is totally incapable of sensible discussion.
    In the good old days pub talk just could be heard in the local pub, nowadays pub talk goed around the world.

    ‘He’s a Nazi’ apparently is supposed to be an argument.
    Forgotten, not known, is that to to turn this assertion into an argument the following is needed;
    - a description of what is a Nazi
    - argument why the person is a Nazi
    - argument of why being a Nazi is wrong.

    Homo sapiens, the knowing man, a big mistake.
    ‘Homo with a large brain, hardly used’, should be the name of our species.

    If indeed our large brains are an inheritage of the ice ages, then one must conclude that this brain is used only then when immediate survival is the issue.
    And by exception, people like Chomsky.

    Read More
  26. Don’t Be Evil | Oh Really, Google?

    The Tower of Google. Googliath. We need a lot of Davids.

    [Sidebar: here I have to admit to my great regret and shame that Russia under Putin is no better than the USA and, frankly, Russia is even worse in many aspects. The sad reality is that the Russian government, under the pious pretext of anti-terrorism, has passed many freedom and privacy crushing laws and that the legal guarantees offered to free speech in Russia are close to zero.

    But this shouldn’t be surprising. Russia never had the First Amendment. So, it’s Speech culture is closer to that of EU and Canada. US would be the same except for its First Amendment. But had Hillary won, she would have packed the Supreme Court with ‘hate speech’ judges who would have interpreted the law differently to take away speech rights.
    But then, US almost never practiced absolute free speech for most of its history. Absolute Free Speech only took hold with activism in the 60s, and the ACLU played a significant role in this. The radicals and boomers back then needed more free speech to spread radical ideas and pornography. Now that they got the power, they want to clamp down on free speech. Interestingly, the boomers who did most for free speech have ultimately created a climate that wants to do away with it.

    Though I believe in free speech, it was lack of such protections that made the rise of Putin possible, along with the sidelining of globalist oligarchs.
    After all, the power of free speech will always be dominated by the super-rich who gain control of media and buy up politicians and institutions. A billionaire and a poor person may have same free speech rights, but who has more Power Speech? The billionaire who can buy up media and hire propagandists to his liking.

    Free Speech was a huge boost for oligarchs in the 90s. They had great wealth and bought up all the big media. Berezhovsky was a media mogul in Russia. In order for Putin to gain power and restore some degree of Russian sovereignty, he had to curtail the Power Speech of the oligarchs. Unfortunately, this affected speech rights of the masses. But it also took away Power Speech of the oligarchs. (It’s like the anti-terrorist measure in the Moscow theater killed both terrorists and audience members.) As the state gained control of information and news, it could combat the power of Mogul Media financed by globalist oligarchs. Now, this was a bargain with the devil as state-run media have their own problems and commit their own kind of abuses. Also, if globalists take over power in Russia, they will use state media to spread their brand of trash… like BBC does.

    But the fact is expanded free speech in the 90s actually undermined Russian independence and sovereignty. Russian oligarchs, many of them Jewish, in collusion with globalist oligarchs, pretty much came to own the real power of ‘free speech’ since they gained monopoly control of media. Look how free speech worked in the 1996 election. Yeltsin was very unpopular, but Mogul Media only fed pro-Yeltsin propaganda while vilifying his opponents.

    So, Russian situation is difficult. It would be nice if Russia had more free speech rights. But for now, such will be taken advantage by globalists with the money to take over media and penetrate media-sphere. (But with the rise of internet, Putinism in media control may no longer be necessary. Prior to spread of internet, Big Money meant media monopoly. Moguls could own free speech. But if Russia were to allow free use of internet to all, it would equalize every Russian voice. As there are more Russian patriots than cucks in the Current Russia, free speech on the internet will be good for Russian nationalism. But then, maybe Putin and his circle want a managed and controlled nationalism. Maybe they are too chummy with globalists after all. Also, maybe they are fearful of voices calling for end of corruption and cronyism that are all too rife in Russia.)

    As for China, there are advantages to state control. Though it’s repressive and stifling, the Chinese media won’t allow the kind of homomaniacal filth that is spread by Western media and its cuck dog media in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Because the West is so dominant in media, finance, and etc, when non-western nations allow free speech, too often the Western narrative and agenda come to dominate. Until non-western nations build up their own power of media and counter-propaganda, their embrace of free speech and open forum will only lead to Western Globalist domination, not least because so many elite non-western professionals are educated in the West.

    Granted, the internet has changed the nature of the game. Prior to the ubiquity of the internet, information and influence were totally dominated by media, academia, and the state. Even in a nation with total free speech protections, only a handful had control of the flow of information. So, Moneyed Speech was the only real effective Free Speech.

    But the rise of the internet changed all that. It was the great equalizer. Some nobody on youtube with catchy style, personality, and interesting take can gain tremendous number of followers and gain as much influence as NY Times or some media giant owned by billionaires. A gork like Pewdiepie was reaching tens of millions of kids. Black Pigeon Speaks’ WHY WOMEN DESTROY CIVILIZATION got more than a million views.
    So, even though these internet platforms were owned by super-billionaires, they were empowering nobodies with just a voice. While the internet age made the rich ever richer — with Bezos taking all of retain and Brin & Zuck grabbing all the platforms — , it gave voice to even to the poorest. It was the strangest phenom in history. Even as globalist oligarchs took away economic security for the peons, their internet services gave peons a voice like never before. So, Google oligarchs push globalism and grow ever richer while the white middle class sink lower. But stuff like youtube allows middle class and working class peons the means to air their grievances and gain millions of viewers, in some cases more than MSM.

    And this played a role in the election of Trump. And now, the oligarchs are beginning to clamp down on the platform. They fear the beast they’ve unleashed. It made them richer than ever, but it also gave voice to the peons. Brin and Page may be super-smart and super-rich with the services they provide and market, but in some ways, some peon with youtube channel and lots of audiences have more influence than Brin, Page, Zuck, Bezos, and etc combined simply by making videos and sharing inconvenient ideas.

    In some ways, the internet even has advantage over academia. While academics know much more than the average peon, there’s a lot they cannot say in order to keep their positions and careers. If they aren’t properly PC or obsequious to the narrative or dogma, they can be fired, demoted, or blacklisted. So, they are always looking over their shoulders. Also, as part of the establishment, they have to be team-players. If they go rogue, they will be fired or shunned.

    But peons have no such worry. They have nothing to lose, so they just shoot their mouths like they feel it. And this means more honesty and courage. Also, peons nowadays can know considerably a lot by doing their own research via the internet. Even though they don’t have the kind of access to info that academics and professionals and government operatives do, the internet provides them with lots of research material if they know where to look.

    Prior to the internet, academics had access to tons of stuff while most people had access only to local libraries. Most local libraries had limited collection of books and interlibrary loans were cumbersome. But now, even a peon can gain plenty of information on a host of stuff. And they can know enough to discuss stuff with semi-expertise. Indeed, Wikipedia is an amateur project.

    The oligarchs would not have bothered with all such if Hillary had won and if the official narrative sailed on smoothly. But the peons caught the nationalist bug and they got awfully politically incorrect and began to question the nature of oligarchic power. And Trump won.

    So, Googliath went about de-monetizing the peons. This had nothing to do with complaints by companies. That’s all bogus. It was really a means to take away shekels from the peons who served as alternative news people for pennies. Take away those pennies and maybe they’ll stop. But the peons kept it up, so now, the hideous Wojcicki ganged up with ADL to strike down entire videos that speak truth to PC tyranny.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sowhat

    Interestingly, the boomers who did most for free speech have ultimately created a climate that wants to do away with it.
     
    I may agree with most of your comment. Included within the term- "boomer",I feel it is far too encompassing in this sentence and, you'll prbably agree after even a little reflection.
  27. Seraphim says:
    @Priss Factor
    DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts.

    Stormfront is something that might be called genuinely neo-nazi. It is serious or thinks it is.

    In contrast, Daily Stormer reads like a sendup of neo-nazism, and one could take it almost as parody,and it may well be in the case of Weev, who I think is mainly in it for the notoriety. As for Anglin, some believe he's an agent. He could be. He is such a freak. He looks like some mixed-race redneck inbred retard. And yet, and this is what's strange, he comes across as reasonably intelligent and even thoughtful(if he wants to be). I wish Spencer didn't stoop to sharing a forum with Anglin, but Anglin can come across as half-intelligent if he tries:

    https://youtu.be/Rm-AIZib0io?t=11m40s

    Because he seems too smart to have such retarded views, some say he must be a FBI agent, a plant. But if he is such, why the clampdown on him? But then, maybe that's part of the plan. Anglin acts totally outrageous, and his behavior justifies the shutdown, and that is used to shut down other people as well.

    Also, I don't think most people who went to Daily Stormer went for serious opinions. They just relished the sense of outrage, crank-up of outlandish headlines.

    Still, DS issue is important for free speech. If DS today, what tomorrow? It's the principle that counts.

    I must take issue with the idea that Nazism was abhorrent. If anything, its problem was a kind of pathological normalism. Nazism showed that excessive and radical attention to health, order, normality, and cleanliness can also be a kind of sickness and perversion. It was excessively anti-septic. In contrast, the problem of something like pedophilia, homomania, and etc is they are excessively septic.

    It's like it isn't healthy either to wallow in filth & mud OR be concerned compulsively with purity & cleanliness. Someone who never washes and acts gross is disgusting. But a germ-freak who obsessively-compulsively tries to maintain hygiene and order is also sick. Organism must seek health and order away from mess and chaos, but it must also accept that it too, as a lifeform, is always in a process of growth and decay. Nazism was like life frozen into perfection. It looked good but wasn't organic.
    You can't drink frozen milk. Of course, you can't drink spoiled milk either. Weimar Germany just let the milk of Germany go bad. For milk to turn into useful culture(like yogurt or sour cream), it has to allow certain kinds of germs to grow under certain conditions. That way, milk is both alive as culture and healthy to consume.

    To an extent, elements in Nazism was a healthy reaction to the excesses of Weimar Germany. But then, Nazism, a kind of radical racist Mormonism, went the other extreme and was excessively obsessed with normality, purity, order, beauty, hygiene, and perfection.

    What people need is a kind of humanism that strives for health, order, and normality but also understands that life is, at its core, chaotic, messy, imperfect, and filled with germs. No matter how much one washes, one can only clean the skin, the surface. The body itself if filled with all sorts of bacteria, viruses, and other foreign elements. And there are all sorts of problems of health, emotions, psychology, etc. There is a broad sense of normality, but there is no perfect normal. And even most normal people have tendencies that are abnormal. Humanism urges us to be tolerant and forgiving of imperfections and problems that are inherent to life. Also, abnormality is often the stuff of genius and inspiration in certain individuals.
    But Nazism was so much into normality, beauty, healthy, and striving for perfection that it turned into a kind of perversion in its own right.
    Also, despite the heroic and noble iconography of Nazism with its 'Aryan' art and such, the key figures of Nazism were pathological dark-souled individuals like Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, and etc. In a way, radical normality and cult of perfection were crutches for their sense of insecurity, inferiority, and anxiety. Now, it's okay for people to have anxieties as no one is god or some superhero. Everyone has weaknesses and disadvantages. A smart person can be ugly. A handsome person can be dumb. A beautiful woman can have unpleasant voice, like in SINGING IN THE RAIN. A woman with beautiful voice may not be much of a looker, like those fat broads in opera. But the cretinous leaders of Nazism could never address their own complexes and neuroses and just buried them under the cult of heroism and megalomania. And this repression fueled their neuroses even further.

    Nazism also failed because many sane and sound people with normal dispositions tend to be weak in personality and haven't the will to step forth and take control. A good example would be Albert Speer. He was essentially a decent man but of weak personality. Not the kind to step forth and take charge of things. Instead, such men let others with stronger personality to take center stage. And they latch onto such figures. (We see this with Neocons and cucks too. Whatever one may say about Jews, they have strong forceful personalities and take charge of power, narrative, and authority. Those with weaker personalities, the Peter Keatings of the world, latch onto forceful Jews. Look at cucks like Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Rich Lowry, Lindsey Graham, and etc. McCain has a temper but no personality. These types only know how to latch onto the Strong personality. And today's 'new hitlers' are the Zionist globalist with a diabolical lust for world control. They got super-chutzpah, and weaker-souled white gentile cucks just go along with stuff like 'gay marriage', Russia Hacking hysteria, 'diversity is our strength', and homo symbols in christian churches.)
    This was true of Mao and those around him. Mao had a very strong personality, and others latched onto him. Zhou En-Lai was more sensible and more intelligent, but he didn't have a strong personality. He didn't know how to take charge. So, the strong personality took charge, and others latched onto him.

    Now, over time, as a system becomes firmly established, there is no more need for strong personalities. Look at China today, and it's impossible for anyone like Mao to come to power. And USSR after Stalin's death could no longer tolerate strong personalities. Consensus of Power was what mattered. When Khrushchev was deemed too erratic, they got rid of him, and the system was ruled by a collective politburo. If Nazism had survived, something similar might have happened after Hitler's death. But Hitler came to power in a world of chaos, and in such a time, a man with forceful personality and magnetism had the clear advantage. And Hitler had it. Normal Germans failed to restore order and balance during the Weimar yrs. They lacked the will, guts, courage, and vision. In contrast, Hitler, for all his deficiencies, had those qualities. And for a time, he restored Germany to its greatness. And if he'd died in 1939, it might have been mostly a happy story for Germany. But he lived on, and his pathological nature simply couldn't stop gambling with history as the new Man of Destiny. And normal sane Germans like Albert Speer who'd failed during the Weimar yrs also failed by lacking the will to say NO to Hitler. But then, the opponents of Nazism also deserve much blame because they squandered their chance to create a sane healthy democracy during the Weimar yrs. Those yrs were not only economically catastrophic. People can weather material hard times with morale and dignity under inspired leadership. It was the cultural filth and moral collapse of Germany that led to so much anger and frustration, like in SERPENT EGG by Bergman.

    https://youtu.be/R2nIe1G6R1s?t=7m16s

    https://youtu.be/rAB2qGdh_lY?t=13m22s

    Obviously, Weimar Germany was culturally sick. Granted, there were genuine artistic achievements in many fields in this period, but society as a whole had lost its bearing, much like Russia in the 90s when it too fell prey to globalists. But instead of combating the disease with national humanism or national spiritualism like Putin did, Hitler and co. pushed for the extreme opposite. IF someone is fat disgusting slob, you try to bring him to health. You don't try to make him pump iron and swallow tons of vitamins and protein supplements to become invincible Terminator. But then, Nazism was bound to be contradictory as it was a Radical Normal Ideology led by bohemians and eccentrics. Hitler and Goebbels were would-be artists who felt at ease with bohemian lifestyles. And yet, esp Hitler had mostly bourgeois tastes and was a misfit in the modernist cultural milieu. Hitler's bohemianism felt at odds with respectable society, but his taste for beauty and form made him a misfit among modernism then in rage. If Nazi leaders had been more honest about their own contradictions, they might have found ways to resolve them. But they repressed them and played the role of transcendent visionary saviors of the nation. And so, their complexes fueled their madness further. In a way, their excessive radical normalism was a desperate way to repress their anxieties and neuroses that were more in tune with modernity. Though MAX isn't a very good movie, it does touch on the contradiction of Hitlerism, a 19th century bohemian romantic sensibility trapped in the world of modernity.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jrs7qk503Y

    An eccentric man too discomfited with his obvious strangeness and unable to confront his own demons, thereby seeking escapism in mythic heroism of history as a grand opera. Hitler couldn't confront his demons so he turned them into avenging angels.

    As for pornography, I think it's made all the worse by homomania. Because homos have been sacralized, we aren't supposed to say negative things about dangerous practice of fecal penetration that greatly increases the likelihood of anal cancer. So, it's spread to real-sexual people too. Also, with pornographic images being so ubiquitous, people need extra kink to get excited. Also, with Negro men increasingly conquering white vaginas, white guys feel a need to feel power over women by some 'extreme' act, and that is bungholery. Since there's a good chance that the vagina of some white 'thot' has already been taken by a Negro, the only way a white guy can act like he's conquering the white female is by violating her bungy.

    But far more problematic than porn itself is the pornification of culture, i.e. the barrier that used to exist between porn and rest of culture is rapidly dissolving. Ariana Grande is supposed to be entertainment for young girls, and yet her songs are totally porny. When 10 yr old girls are allowed to attend her concert by her parents, pornification is seeping down to children. And if kids are thus sexualized, doesn't it essentially normalize pedophilia, at least step by step? If pornified pop culture is suitable for kids, it means kids are sexual creatures. If so, why shouldn't they engage in sex? Furthermore, if even elementary school kids are taught about ass-buggery, won't young boys think, "it's okay to have pee pee in my poo poo?" If adults allow young kids to think like this, pedophilia will gradually become normalized.

    Well said.
    Wouldn’t you think that at the bottom of the ‘perversions’ of Nazism, Communism, Greenism is the same utopian desire to build the ‘Kingdom of God’ on earth, an impossibility by definition? Striving after wind (“And I set my mind to seek and explore by wisdom concerning all that has been done under heaven. It is a grievous task which God has given to the sons of men to be afflicted with. 14I have seen all the works which have been done under the sun, and behold, all is vanity and striving after wind. 15What is crooked cannot be straightened and what is lacking cannot be counted.…” – Eccl. 1:13-15)?

    Read More
  28. @cricket
    I believe The Saker is referring to the intellectual horsepower of said groups, not the logistics to affect dissemination of said ideas. Also, libertarians are often misunderstood in their core philosophy, which is primarily philosophical, not economic, (the economics are more of a corollary to the political idea of small-government or de-centralized government). Thus, their radar is by nature far more attune to government overreach. See antiwar.com for instance.

    If you want to argue that they lack numeric quantity to make much of a difference, I would probably agree, in large part due to their political marginalization.

    I believe The Saker is referring to the intellectual horsepower of said groups, not the logistics to affect dissemination of said ideas.

    Yeah, but like I said, the libertarians don’t see any problem with private actors banning unpopular (or undesirable, i.e.: communist) speech. And that will always happen.

    As for the paleoconservatives, they may not be too unsympathetic to the Nazis specifically, but I don’t think they would have any problem with suppressing and banning the forms of discourse that they consider subversive, harmful to ‘the nation’.

    Read More
  29. Wally says:

    The facts are that the National Socialists were ….. well socialists.

    So ‘the socialists came for the socialists’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Yes. But you must highlight, repeatedly, the problem. Martin Niemoller was a rather typical German ultra Liberal Lutheran and Socialist, and bleeding-heart German Socialists, like Jews everywhere, were damned determined make certain that the world would NOT see the NAZIs for the Socialists they were.
    , @Parfois
    Wally, as I have suspected, is an idiot. If a raven says he's white, so he must be white. Funny logic...
  30. Although I like the intent of the quote used at the beginning, I would add another that I think states the same idea from another angle. It is from Robert Bolt’s “A Man For All Seasons”.

    “William Roper: “So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!”

    Sir Thomas More: “Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?”

    William Roper: “Yes, I’d cut down every law in England to do that!”

    Sir Thomas More: “Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned ’round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s! And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake!”

    Read More
    • Replies: @iKnowYouAreButWhatAmI
    LOVE that play and that scene in particular has been on my mind a lot lately. But don't worry this isn't Spain :)
  31. Wally says: • Website
    @Priss Factor
    DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts.

    Stormfront is something that might be called genuinely neo-nazi. It is serious or thinks it is.

    In contrast, Daily Stormer reads like a sendup of neo-nazism, and one could take it almost as parody,and it may well be in the case of Weev, who I think is mainly in it for the notoriety. As for Anglin, some believe he's an agent. He could be. He is such a freak. He looks like some mixed-race redneck inbred retard. And yet, and this is what's strange, he comes across as reasonably intelligent and even thoughtful(if he wants to be). I wish Spencer didn't stoop to sharing a forum with Anglin, but Anglin can come across as half-intelligent if he tries:

    https://youtu.be/Rm-AIZib0io?t=11m40s

    Because he seems too smart to have such retarded views, some say he must be a FBI agent, a plant. But if he is such, why the clampdown on him? But then, maybe that's part of the plan. Anglin acts totally outrageous, and his behavior justifies the shutdown, and that is used to shut down other people as well.

    Also, I don't think most people who went to Daily Stormer went for serious opinions. They just relished the sense of outrage, crank-up of outlandish headlines.

    Still, DS issue is important for free speech. If DS today, what tomorrow? It's the principle that counts.

    I must take issue with the idea that Nazism was abhorrent. If anything, its problem was a kind of pathological normalism. Nazism showed that excessive and radical attention to health, order, normality, and cleanliness can also be a kind of sickness and perversion. It was excessively anti-septic. In contrast, the problem of something like pedophilia, homomania, and etc is they are excessively septic.

    It's like it isn't healthy either to wallow in filth & mud OR be concerned compulsively with purity & cleanliness. Someone who never washes and acts gross is disgusting. But a germ-freak who obsessively-compulsively tries to maintain hygiene and order is also sick. Organism must seek health and order away from mess and chaos, but it must also accept that it too, as a lifeform, is always in a process of growth and decay. Nazism was like life frozen into perfection. It looked good but wasn't organic.
    You can't drink frozen milk. Of course, you can't drink spoiled milk either. Weimar Germany just let the milk of Germany go bad. For milk to turn into useful culture(like yogurt or sour cream), it has to allow certain kinds of germs to grow under certain conditions. That way, milk is both alive as culture and healthy to consume.

    To an extent, elements in Nazism was a healthy reaction to the excesses of Weimar Germany. But then, Nazism, a kind of radical racist Mormonism, went the other extreme and was excessively obsessed with normality, purity, order, beauty, hygiene, and perfection.

    What people need is a kind of humanism that strives for health, order, and normality but also understands that life is, at its core, chaotic, messy, imperfect, and filled with germs. No matter how much one washes, one can only clean the skin, the surface. The body itself if filled with all sorts of bacteria, viruses, and other foreign elements. And there are all sorts of problems of health, emotions, psychology, etc. There is a broad sense of normality, but there is no perfect normal. And even most normal people have tendencies that are abnormal. Humanism urges us to be tolerant and forgiving of imperfections and problems that are inherent to life. Also, abnormality is often the stuff of genius and inspiration in certain individuals.
    But Nazism was so much into normality, beauty, healthy, and striving for perfection that it turned into a kind of perversion in its own right.
    Also, despite the heroic and noble iconography of Nazism with its 'Aryan' art and such, the key figures of Nazism were pathological dark-souled individuals like Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, and etc. In a way, radical normality and cult of perfection were crutches for their sense of insecurity, inferiority, and anxiety. Now, it's okay for people to have anxieties as no one is god or some superhero. Everyone has weaknesses and disadvantages. A smart person can be ugly. A handsome person can be dumb. A beautiful woman can have unpleasant voice, like in SINGING IN THE RAIN. A woman with beautiful voice may not be much of a looker, like those fat broads in opera. But the cretinous leaders of Nazism could never address their own complexes and neuroses and just buried them under the cult of heroism and megalomania. And this repression fueled their neuroses even further.

    Nazism also failed because many sane and sound people with normal dispositions tend to be weak in personality and haven't the will to step forth and take control. A good example would be Albert Speer. He was essentially a decent man but of weak personality. Not the kind to step forth and take charge of things. Instead, such men let others with stronger personality to take center stage. And they latch onto such figures. (We see this with Neocons and cucks too. Whatever one may say about Jews, they have strong forceful personalities and take charge of power, narrative, and authority. Those with weaker personalities, the Peter Keatings of the world, latch onto forceful Jews. Look at cucks like Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Rich Lowry, Lindsey Graham, and etc. McCain has a temper but no personality. These types only know how to latch onto the Strong personality. And today's 'new hitlers' are the Zionist globalist with a diabolical lust for world control. They got super-chutzpah, and weaker-souled white gentile cucks just go along with stuff like 'gay marriage', Russia Hacking hysteria, 'diversity is our strength', and homo symbols in christian churches.)
    This was true of Mao and those around him. Mao had a very strong personality, and others latched onto him. Zhou En-Lai was more sensible and more intelligent, but he didn't have a strong personality. He didn't know how to take charge. So, the strong personality took charge, and others latched onto him.

    Now, over time, as a system becomes firmly established, there is no more need for strong personalities. Look at China today, and it's impossible for anyone like Mao to come to power. And USSR after Stalin's death could no longer tolerate strong personalities. Consensus of Power was what mattered. When Khrushchev was deemed too erratic, they got rid of him, and the system was ruled by a collective politburo. If Nazism had survived, something similar might have happened after Hitler's death. But Hitler came to power in a world of chaos, and in such a time, a man with forceful personality and magnetism had the clear advantage. And Hitler had it. Normal Germans failed to restore order and balance during the Weimar yrs. They lacked the will, guts, courage, and vision. In contrast, Hitler, for all his deficiencies, had those qualities. And for a time, he restored Germany to its greatness. And if he'd died in 1939, it might have been mostly a happy story for Germany. But he lived on, and his pathological nature simply couldn't stop gambling with history as the new Man of Destiny. And normal sane Germans like Albert Speer who'd failed during the Weimar yrs also failed by lacking the will to say NO to Hitler. But then, the opponents of Nazism also deserve much blame because they squandered their chance to create a sane healthy democracy during the Weimar yrs. Those yrs were not only economically catastrophic. People can weather material hard times with morale and dignity under inspired leadership. It was the cultural filth and moral collapse of Germany that led to so much anger and frustration, like in SERPENT EGG by Bergman.

    https://youtu.be/R2nIe1G6R1s?t=7m16s

    https://youtu.be/rAB2qGdh_lY?t=13m22s

    Obviously, Weimar Germany was culturally sick. Granted, there were genuine artistic achievements in many fields in this period, but society as a whole had lost its bearing, much like Russia in the 90s when it too fell prey to globalists. But instead of combating the disease with national humanism or national spiritualism like Putin did, Hitler and co. pushed for the extreme opposite. IF someone is fat disgusting slob, you try to bring him to health. You don't try to make him pump iron and swallow tons of vitamins and protein supplements to become invincible Terminator. But then, Nazism was bound to be contradictory as it was a Radical Normal Ideology led by bohemians and eccentrics. Hitler and Goebbels were would-be artists who felt at ease with bohemian lifestyles. And yet, esp Hitler had mostly bourgeois tastes and was a misfit in the modernist cultural milieu. Hitler's bohemianism felt at odds with respectable society, but his taste for beauty and form made him a misfit among modernism then in rage. If Nazi leaders had been more honest about their own contradictions, they might have found ways to resolve them. But they repressed them and played the role of transcendent visionary saviors of the nation. And so, their complexes fueled their madness further. In a way, their excessive radical normalism was a desperate way to repress their anxieties and neuroses that were more in tune with modernity. Though MAX isn't a very good movie, it does touch on the contradiction of Hitlerism, a 19th century bohemian romantic sensibility trapped in the world of modernity.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jrs7qk503Y

    An eccentric man too discomfited with his obvious strangeness and unable to confront his own demons, thereby seeking escapism in mythic heroism of history as a grand opera. Hitler couldn't confront his demons so he turned them into avenging angels.

    As for pornography, I think it's made all the worse by homomania. Because homos have been sacralized, we aren't supposed to say negative things about dangerous practice of fecal penetration that greatly increases the likelihood of anal cancer. So, it's spread to real-sexual people too. Also, with pornographic images being so ubiquitous, people need extra kink to get excited. Also, with Negro men increasingly conquering white vaginas, white guys feel a need to feel power over women by some 'extreme' act, and that is bungholery. Since there's a good chance that the vagina of some white 'thot' has already been taken by a Negro, the only way a white guy can act like he's conquering the white female is by violating her bungy.

    But far more problematic than porn itself is the pornification of culture, i.e. the barrier that used to exist between porn and rest of culture is rapidly dissolving. Ariana Grande is supposed to be entertainment for young girls, and yet her songs are totally porny. When 10 yr old girls are allowed to attend her concert by her parents, pornification is seeping down to children. And if kids are thus sexualized, doesn't it essentially normalize pedophilia, at least step by step? If pornified pop culture is suitable for kids, it means kids are sexual creatures. If so, why shouldn't they engage in sex? Furthermore, if even elementary school kids are taught about ass-buggery, won't young boys think, "it's okay to have pee pee in my poo poo?" If adults allow young kids to think like this, pedophilia will gradually become normalized.

    Oh Yawn.

    Feeble try, but no cigar.

    You’re right out of Zionist Wm. Shirer’s grade school play book.
    ‘Soap made from Jews’, ‘human skin lampshades’, and the whole laughable bit.

    IOW, you talk a lot, but ultimately are just another of the conditioned lemmings.

    “One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”

    - signed by 34 “reputable historians” and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

    Simply stated, there were the ‘Nazis’ with the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:

    http://codoh.com

    No name calling, level playing field debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
  32. Wally says:

    It’s revealing that many homosexuals & their groups advocate FOR pedophilia.

    Where’ the Limousine Left’s outrage at that?

    plus:
    left wing violence forgotten by media

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/08/30/ann-coulter-media-never-ending-hunt-right-wing-violence/

    The entire Charlottesville event was a staged event, a classic strategy of provocation operation which is going to be used as psywar pushing for national imposition of martial law and the deep state coup against Trump and the remnants of the Republic.

    Read on.

    The facts about Charlottesville that the Zionist dominated MSM do not allow:

    http://www.unz.com/article/narrative-collapse-is-charlottesvilles-james-alex-fields-the-next-george-zimmerman/

    and:
    Proof of staging, see video:
    different cars, different driver than alleged driver, photo shopped ‘flying people’ & crash backgrounds, lot’s more.
    It’s not difficult, just open your eyes.

    Charlottesville, a set-up

    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/08/charlottesville_and_its_aftermath_what_if_it_was_a_setup.html

    “We have been working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to, during, and after the rally.”
    - Zionist Anita Gray, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League.
    must read: http://www.unz.com/article/how-the-jews-won-the-battle-of-charlottesville/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Please identify 3 homosexual groups advocating for pedophilia.
    , @Anon
    Right. And the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is democratic and a republic.
    , @anarchyst
    You are correct. Homosexuality and pedophilia are inextricably linked. It is ADULT homosexuals who prey on pre-pubescent and teen-age BOYS, recruiting them into the "lifestyle", before their (normal) heterosexual mores are set.
    The so-called Catholic priest "child abuse sex scandal" was actually homosexual pedophilic recruitment in action. Of course, the "mainstream media" could not afford to offend its readership by calling it by its true definition--homosexual pedophilia.
    It is a loosely-guarded secret that there was (is still?) a "lavender lobby" in the American seminary system. Good, straight, heterosexual candidates for the priesthood were purposely discouraged and de-selected from applying for the priesthood, so that the homosexual types could recruit and appoint "their own kind" to the priesthood. One has to wonder how "high-up" the "lavender lobby" goes...how many bishops and cardinals are part of this sordid group?
    That being said, there is actually MORE homosexual pedophilic behavior among ministers of other faiths, media types and politicians, school and public officials, than there ever was in the Catholic Church. Look at the "pass" pedophiles Jeff Epstein and Bill Clinton get despite their sordid behavior. There is a large pedophilia scandal involving many high-ranking public officials in the UK that is being covered up on "national security" grounds. Sorta tells you something...
    While I am glad this sordid behavior was exposed and is being remedied in the Catholic Church, it is clear that the "lugenpresse" has a visceral hatred of the Catholic Church, splashing Catholic transgressions all over the media while conveniently ignoring the greater numbers outside the Catholic hierarchy.
  33. @cricket
    I am pretty sure I get what The Saker is trying to say. However, I wish he would reconsider some of the context/tactics that weaken the overall argument he lays out.

    1. Pedophiles are the most disgusting form of human on Earth. By nature, being a pedophile requires an action, which is both illegal and immoral, and has nothing to do with 1st amendment/free speech rights. It is prosecutable under law as it should be.

    2. The hypocrisy between allowing child molester (chomo) websites and deleting Nazi-sympathizing websites is duly noted and correct; however, simply "hating" people is not an action, where being a chomo is. There is a fundamental difference and no slippery slope insofar as this particular analogy. For example, a declaration of "I hate Jews" is not the same as actually raping a child. One is an action, the other is talk.

    3. The 1st amendment is quite specific as what you can and can't do, as well as legal (and moral) precedent over obscenity, which chomo websites likely violate with regularity (I won't be visiting any). As long as direct, specific violence isn't advocated by daily stormer, they should be on solid legal grounds. Here, the corporations have circumvented their legal rights.

    4. the 1st amendment's primary, and only real functionary concern was to allow the citizenry to speak out against the government. You don't get to do the proverbial yelling of "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there isn't one. In other words, its largely a political context. Chomos are not political; they are just the most disgusting form of criminal. Nazis, as despicable as their position may be, are a dissident political view and as such have protected 1st amendment rights (as long as they are not actually engaging directly in violence).

    I hope The Saker were to consider some of this in order to form a more well founded argument, as I believe his overall thesis is correct and that he in no way is an advocate of chomos or Nazis. This is why it is important to have free discussion: to refine and flesh out political opinion.

    “Pedophiles are the most disgusting form of human on Earth.”

    Anti-semite.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Che Guava
    I would just use the 'LOL' button but for the one-hour limit.

    The LOL and Troll buttons are always ambiguous, is one LOLling with or at? Is one saying good troll, or the recipient is just a stupid troll? I tend to use both in both ways, doubtless leading to misunderstandings.

    Read, only two days ago, an article on a Jewish site about a Hassidic rabbi (now shunned) who campaigns against man-boy paedo behaviour at ritual baths. It was horrifying.

    Eve Einsler included a seduction of an underaged girl (early teens) in the original version of the horrid Vagina Monologues. 'Moy vaijina' etc. She changed the age ref. more recently.

    The vaunted Allen Ginsberg, bad poet, was a founding member of NAMBLA.

    So I am thinking your association made so concisely has reason on its side.
  34. I cannot resist adding two more quotes from Robert Bolt’s “A Man For All Seasons”. It is clear to me from the article that the intersection of law and morality is a difficult and often dangerous place to find oneself. Human nature, being what it is, does not like difficult and dangerous situations. On the question of society and human nature and the value of moral clarity, Bolt has Sir Thomas More state:

    “If we lived in a State where virtue was profitable, common sense would make us good, and greed would make us saintly. And we’d live like animals or angels in the happy land that /needs/ no heroes. But since in fact we see that avarice, anger, envy, pride, sloth, lust and stupidity commonly profit far beyond humility, chastity, fortitude, justice and thought, and have to choose, to be human at all… why then perhaps we /must/ stand fast a little –even at the risk of being heroes.”

    And the temptation to appear solidly virtuous while adjusting our actiions to avoid the difficulties and dangers that result seems to me to be clearly summarised with this quote:

    “Thomas More: Will, I’d trust you with my life. But not your principles. You see, we speak of being anchored to our principles. But if the weather turns nasty you up with an anchor and let it down where there’s less wind, and the fishing’s better. And “Look,” we say, “look, I’m anchored! To my principles!”

    Read More
  35. Realist says:
    @Robert Magill

    I think that by now most paleoconservatives and libertarians have understood that “the Trump presidency is over” as Bannon put it. Trump is a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons.
     
    What if Trump doesn't know he's "a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons." ? What if he does know this and doesn't give a damn? What if only a crushed and neutered intellectual midget with guts can prevail in this chaos? If not Trump, who? If not Trump, when? Times running out, friends.


    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    “What if Trump doesn’t know he’s “a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons.” ? What if he does know this and doesn’t give a damn? What if only a crushed and neutered intellectual midget with guts can prevail in this chaos?”

    Then the Deep State will kill him.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sowhat
    Perhaps, but he could die trying. I've tweeted his (The Whitehouse hash tag, too) with links of revelatory articles, just hoping.
  36. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    All that brain-washing since birth about those nasty Nazis and how Hitler was the biggest mass-murderer of the 20th Century is now paying off. Americans see a swastika or a pic of Hitler and recoil in disgust, making for fertile ground for those Antifa Thugs to recruit.

    But Hitler WASN’T the biggest mass murderer of the 20th Century, that title goes to the Russian Jew Genrikh Yagoda, Stalin’s personal butcher who was very good at murdering Russians, mostly Christian peasants who refused to bow down to Godless Communism.

    And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the “bloodthirsty dwarf.”

    In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin.

    https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

    Read More
    • Replies: @Parfois
    @ Greg Bacon

    Please don't try to replace Superman Stalin from his position of the most murderous man in human history. Robert Conquest (The Great Terror) was the first to come up with the figure of 60 million although in the second edition of the book he reduced it to a more believable 20 million. The snag is, if you go through the trouble of checking the demographics of the USSR you will not find any decrease of its population except during the WWII years!

    Yes, Yagoda was a nasty piece of shit, like many others of the tribe who jumped into the Communist bandwagon to positions of power and committed atrocities against the Russian people, starting with Trotsy himself when he massacred the rebellious sailors of Kronstadt. But he was not Stalin's executioner - he was very capable of taking the initiative without any prompting from above - and in fact he was executed for his crimes.

    Glad to know that 10 million can now be deducted from Stalin's score!
    , @Thirdeye
    The 10 million figure for premature deaths during the collectivization is pure horseshit. The Soviets were short of manpower due to the demographic collapse from the privations of the First World War and the Civil War and they knew it. They were not gratuitously eliminating much-needed manpower.

    The biggest death toll from Communist policy was in China during the Great Leap Forward, 20 million minimum.. Mao regarded peasant lives as expendable in furtherance of his goals.
  37. Shahna says:
    @iffen
    First They Came for the Nazis and Pedophiles

    Good riddance!

    Articles like this one make me wish they would hurry up and get to people like you.

    They will.
    And then they will get to you.

    Make no mistake, they aren’t interested in some Nazis and pedophiles – are you nuts?
    They’re interested in stifling dissent. Nazis and pedophiles is how they get you used to the idea of stifling and how they get the mechanisms in place to make it easy, simple, already a done thing; no debate required – just a little more each time.

    Now it’s Nazis and pedophiles, in 6 months time it’s The Saker and a year or two from now, it’s you.
    It’s only by protecting the right of the worst of us to speak today that we can guarantee our own right to speak tomorrow.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    Every theoretical idea, including sociopolitical Rights, come with the understanding that in the practical arena there are limits to the theoretical. Thus when Saker writes the following:

    This is paradoxical, but the countries who are at the forefront of the resistance to the AngloZionist Empire have even less of a culture of freedom, especially on the Internet, than the USA or most EU countries.
     
    he has in fact, through this apparent paradox, arrived at that simple truth; every government, to a greater or lesser extent, realises that total laissez faire will result in anarchy. The key for successful states are the checks and balances written into their Constitutions. The USA has the best.
    , @iffen
    It’s only by protecting the right of the worst of us to speak today that we can guarantee our own right to speak tomorrow.

    I understand the concept, I just can't get into whining about there not being safe spaces for Nazis.

    I don't believe it works unless there is a political consensus.

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.
  38. Parfois says:

    Fully agree with The Saker: our concept of freedom (which includes the freedom to say anything) is in conflict with a state or corporate control of what is being said. If what one says is offensive to someone else and causes harm, the courts of law have the power to make amends and order compensation to the plaintiff. This is not a perfect system of course (money talks louder through corporate control of media outlets and legal expenses in litigation) and the state should intervene to prevent abuse of power by the media corporations by outlawing one-sided contracts.

    Fully agreeing with the sentiments of The Saker, it is lamentable that he does not practise what he preaches. His site is littered with the shadows of many ex-contributors who left in disgust because of his autocratic censorship against commenters whose opinions deviated from the established orthodoxy even on trivial subject matters. Perhaps it’s about time he considered a self-criticism session and public admission of overreach to aspire to credibility.

    Read More
  39. Poke646,0 says:

    “I have no use for Nazis (or any other kind of non state sanctioned racists or racialists)…”

    Fixed that sentence for you.

    Read More
  40. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    It's revealing that many homosexuals & their groups advocate FOR pedophilia.

    Where' the Limousine Left's outrage at that?

    plus:
    left wing violence forgotten by media
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/08/30/ann-coulter-media-never-ending-hunt-right-wing-violence/

    The entire Charlottesville event was a staged event, a classic strategy of provocation operation which is going to be used as psywar pushing for national imposition of martial law and the deep state coup against Trump and the remnants of the Republic.

    Read on.

    The facts about Charlottesville that the Zionist dominated MSM do not allow:
    http://www.unz.com/article/narrative-collapse-is-charlottesvilles-james-alex-fields-the-next-george-zimmerman/
    and:
    Proof of staging, see video:
    different cars, different driver than alleged driver, photo shopped 'flying people' & crash backgrounds, lot's more.
    It's not difficult, just open your eyes.
    https://youtu.be/o3De-coZyGc

    Charlottesville, a set-up
    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/08/charlottesville_and_its_aftermath_what_if_it_was_a_setup.html

    “We have been working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to, during, and after the rally."
    - Zionist Anita Gray, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League.
    must read: http://www.unz.com/article/how-the-jews-won-the-battle-of-charlottesville/

    Please identify 3 homosexual groups advocating for pedophilia.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Read for yourself, simpleton.

    Gays Rights May Open Door for Pedophile Rights
    Democrats have attempted to normalize pedophilia as a sexual orientation

    https://www.infowars.com/gays-rights-may-open-door-for-pedophile-rights/
  41. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    It's revealing that many homosexuals & their groups advocate FOR pedophilia.

    Where' the Limousine Left's outrage at that?

    plus:
    left wing violence forgotten by media
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/08/30/ann-coulter-media-never-ending-hunt-right-wing-violence/

    The entire Charlottesville event was a staged event, a classic strategy of provocation operation which is going to be used as psywar pushing for national imposition of martial law and the deep state coup against Trump and the remnants of the Republic.

    Read on.

    The facts about Charlottesville that the Zionist dominated MSM do not allow:
    http://www.unz.com/article/narrative-collapse-is-charlottesvilles-james-alex-fields-the-next-george-zimmerman/
    and:
    Proof of staging, see video:
    different cars, different driver than alleged driver, photo shopped 'flying people' & crash backgrounds, lot's more.
    It's not difficult, just open your eyes.
    https://youtu.be/o3De-coZyGc

    Charlottesville, a set-up
    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/08/charlottesville_and_its_aftermath_what_if_it_was_a_setup.html

    “We have been working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to, during, and after the rally."
    - Zionist Anita Gray, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League.
    must read: http://www.unz.com/article/how-the-jews-won-the-battle-of-charlottesville/

    Right. And the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is democratic and a republic.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    What are you talking about, do you even know?

    Anyway, while you're babbling, according to Zionists like yourself "that shitty little country" is the only democracy in the Middle East.
    Now that's hilarious.

  42. I would note that there is another “consensus villain” out there which the Empire loves to single out for fear and hatred: the pedophiles … Of course our rulers don’t give a damn about our kids: the only use they have for our kids is to use them in the pedophile sex rings, that’s it (oh yes, while pedophilia is a crime for the commoner, it is a universal status symbol for our masters and overlords; Pizzagate anybody?).

    The pedo thing, just like the Nazi thing, is just some double standard the system can selectively deploy — or downplay — based on their interests at the moment. Pedophilia? Well, it’s a crime if you’re a Catholic priest; but if, like the Pizzagate people, you’re a ‘Friend of Bill’, they’ll cover for you. Same with Naziism. If you’re a white nationalist or traditionalist who wants to exercise your constitutional rights of free speech/assembly here in the good ole US of A, they’re going to declare war and send in the Antifa cavalry. But what about Nazis in Ukraine? Perish the thought! Russian propaganda! The Azov Battalion, the Dnepr Battalion, the Svoboda Party, and Pravy Sektor are all figments of your febrile imagination!

    See how it works?

    I can hear the objection “what about the terrorists?”

    Groups like ISIS, al Nusra Front, Ahrar al Sham have very little trouble running websites and networking through standard social media platforms, such as Fakebook. How do you think they were able to recruit people from all over the world so easily? Another double standard (see above).

    Read More
  43. Parfois says:
    @Greg Bacon
    All that brain-washing since birth about those nasty Nazis and how Hitler was the biggest mass-murderer of the 20th Century is now paying off. Americans see a swastika or a pic of Hitler and recoil in disgust, making for fertile ground for those Antifa Thugs to recruit.

    But Hitler WASN'T the biggest mass murderer of the 20th Century, that title goes to the Russian Jew Genrikh Yagoda, Stalin's personal butcher who was very good at murdering Russians, mostly Christian peasants who refused to bow down to Godless Communism.

    And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name "Genrikh Yagoda," the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the "bloodthirsty dwarf."

    In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin.

    https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html
     

    @ Greg Bacon

    Please don’t try to replace Superman Stalin from his position of the most murderous man in human history. Robert Conquest (The Great Terror) was the first to come up with the figure of 60 million although in the second edition of the book he reduced it to a more believable 20 million. The snag is, if you go through the trouble of checking the demographics of the USSR you will not find any decrease of its population except during the WWII years!

    Yes, Yagoda was a nasty piece of shit, like many others of the tribe who jumped into the Communist bandwagon to positions of power and committed atrocities against the Russian people, starting with Trotsy himself when he massacred the rebellious sailors of Kronstadt. But he was not Stalin’s executioner – he was very capable of taking the initiative without any prompting from above – and in fact he was executed for his crimes.

    Glad to know that 10 million can now be deducted from Stalin’s score!

    Read More
    • Replies: @fnn

    The snag is, if you go through the trouble of checking the demographics of the USSR you will not find any decrease of its population except during the WWII years!
     
    Yeah, the USSR never produced any fake statistics.
  44. TheJester says:
    @cricket
    I am pretty sure I get what The Saker is trying to say. However, I wish he would reconsider some of the context/tactics that weaken the overall argument he lays out.

    1. Pedophiles are the most disgusting form of human on Earth. By nature, being a pedophile requires an action, which is both illegal and immoral, and has nothing to do with 1st amendment/free speech rights. It is prosecutable under law as it should be.

    2. The hypocrisy between allowing child molester (chomo) websites and deleting Nazi-sympathizing websites is duly noted and correct; however, simply "hating" people is not an action, where being a chomo is. There is a fundamental difference and no slippery slope insofar as this particular analogy. For example, a declaration of "I hate Jews" is not the same as actually raping a child. One is an action, the other is talk.

    3. The 1st amendment is quite specific as what you can and can't do, as well as legal (and moral) precedent over obscenity, which chomo websites likely violate with regularity (I won't be visiting any). As long as direct, specific violence isn't advocated by daily stormer, they should be on solid legal grounds. Here, the corporations have circumvented their legal rights.

    4. the 1st amendment's primary, and only real functionary concern was to allow the citizenry to speak out against the government. You don't get to do the proverbial yelling of "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there isn't one. In other words, its largely a political context. Chomos are not political; they are just the most disgusting form of criminal. Nazis, as despicable as their position may be, are a dissident political view and as such have protected 1st amendment rights (as long as they are not actually engaging directly in violence).

    I hope The Saker were to consider some of this in order to form a more well founded argument, as I believe his overall thesis is correct and that he in no way is an advocate of chomos or Nazis. This is why it is important to have free discussion: to refine and flesh out political opinion.

    One of the first arguments for the total surveillance of the populations of the United States and Great Britain was …

    “We’re looking for pedophiles. Total surveillance is necessary to find these despicable creatures and protect our children.”

    I suppose that means if the security agencies don’t find one, they throw the data away.

    No, we keep the data just in case we discover after the fact that someone was a pedophile and we need to put together a profile.”

    The above was the justification by the British government for recording and keeping data on every website visited by everyone in the UK. I recall the same sputterings from Washington DC when G. W. Bush’s illegal surveillance programs were exposed post-911. Finding and punishing pedophiles is always the first and fallback position for total surveillance programs.

    P.S. Strange that the British have such problems finding pedophiles given the disposition of their upper class toward homosexuality and pedophilia. Note the investigation into pedophile rings among prime ministers, judges, professors, and other elite in the UK that has gone on since the 1990s without result. Whistleblowers claim that the police were repeatedly ordered to stand down due to national security concerns.

    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vdxbw4/everything-we-know-so-far-about-the-pedophilia-allegations-against-former-uk-prime-minister-edward-heath-804

    The Saker suggests we have the same kind of thing going on in the United States.

    Of course our rulers don’t give a damn about our kids: the only use they have for our kids is to use them in the pedophile sex rings, that’s it (oh yes, while pedophilia is a crime for the commoner, it is a universal status symbol for our masters and overlords; Pizzagate anybody?).

    Read More
  45. escobar says:

    Saker ignores the numbers of Jews killed in the Holocaust provided by historians like Timothy Snyder.
    For example:
    “Of the 5.7 million Jews killed, roughly 3 million were pre-war Polish citizens…” and more specific numbers based on his extensive research for “Bloodlands.”
    In “Holocaust: The Ignored Reality,” New York Review of Books, July 16, 2009
    But it is true that many (most?) Jewish organizations and the media cling to the “6 million” account.
    Tell both to read books on the topic by American, German, British historians.

    Read More
  46. It appears that The Daily Stormer was an agent provocateur site an was funded by Zionists as these type of sites often are not what they appear t0 be.

    Read More
  47. @Robert Magill

    I think that by now most paleoconservatives and libertarians have understood that “the Trump presidency is over” as Bannon put it. Trump is a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons.
     
    What if Trump doesn't know he's "a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons." ? What if he does know this and doesn't give a damn? What if only a crushed and neutered intellectual midget with guts can prevail in this chaos? If not Trump, who? If not Trump, when? Times running out, friends.


    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    Trump has no philosophical base. If he does the “right thing” it would be a chance event. The man is all over the place. Sadly.

    Read More
  48. Sowhat says:
    @Realist
    "What if Trump doesn’t know he’s “a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons.” ? What if he does know this and doesn’t give a damn? What if only a crushed and neutered intellectual midget with guts can prevail in this chaos?"

    Then the Deep State will kill him.

    Perhaps, but he could die trying. I’ve tweeted his (The Whitehouse hash tag, too) with links of revelatory articles, just hoping.

    Read More
  49. Saker

    You and the Hindus and the Muslims don’t mind enjoying the full benefits of the Anglo Saxon conquest of North America…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jake
    Those benefits include, they feature,: 1) Jews as the now dominant partner in a culture war against the vast majority of white Christians; 2) blacks as the sacred cow race used to be the low IQ riot squad and sponge sucking up the wealth of the non-rich whites; 3) gays made another sacred cow, to the extent of insanity that we see with transgendersim; 4) Moslems made yet another sacred cow, including by Jews, which is utterly insane; 5) unrelenting war to damn and then obliterate America's conservative white Christian past.

    Are you in favor of those benefits?
    , @Anonymous
    Given that anglo-saxons enjoyed the 'full benefits' of colonising hindu and muslim lands through conquest, is it really that bad if hindus and muslims come here 'legally' and earn their wages legally and upon 'invitation' (note the word invitation) of the anglo-saxon govts and companies themselves?
  50. Jake says:

    “… the brutal crackdown on free speech by the AngloZionist Empire by means of its ‘loyal corporations’.”

    And that is nothing new.

    Read More
  51. Banning The Daily Stormer has done more to give it publicity than Andrew Anglin could have imagined in his wildest dreams. What was once a fairly obscure website is now world famous.

    And of course, once you ban or censor something it becomes that much more fascinating and appealing, particularly to the young.

    Read More
  52. Jake says:
    @Wally
    The facts are that the National Socialists were ..... well socialists.

    So 'the socialists came for the socialists'.

    Yes. But you must highlight, repeatedly, the problem. Martin Niemoller was a rather typical German ultra Liberal Lutheran and Socialist, and bleeding-heart German Socialists, like Jews everywhere, were damned determined make certain that the world would NOT see the NAZIs for the Socialists they were.

    Read More
  53. @cricket
    I am pretty sure I get what The Saker is trying to say. However, I wish he would reconsider some of the context/tactics that weaken the overall argument he lays out.

    1. Pedophiles are the most disgusting form of human on Earth. By nature, being a pedophile requires an action, which is both illegal and immoral, and has nothing to do with 1st amendment/free speech rights. It is prosecutable under law as it should be.

    2. The hypocrisy between allowing child molester (chomo) websites and deleting Nazi-sympathizing websites is duly noted and correct; however, simply "hating" people is not an action, where being a chomo is. There is a fundamental difference and no slippery slope insofar as this particular analogy. For example, a declaration of "I hate Jews" is not the same as actually raping a child. One is an action, the other is talk.

    3. The 1st amendment is quite specific as what you can and can't do, as well as legal (and moral) precedent over obscenity, which chomo websites likely violate with regularity (I won't be visiting any). As long as direct, specific violence isn't advocated by daily stormer, they should be on solid legal grounds. Here, the corporations have circumvented their legal rights.

    4. the 1st amendment's primary, and only real functionary concern was to allow the citizenry to speak out against the government. You don't get to do the proverbial yelling of "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there isn't one. In other words, its largely a political context. Chomos are not political; they are just the most disgusting form of criminal. Nazis, as despicable as their position may be, are a dissident political view and as such have protected 1st amendment rights (as long as they are not actually engaging directly in violence).

    I hope The Saker were to consider some of this in order to form a more well founded argument, as I believe his overall thesis is correct and that he in no way is an advocate of chomos or Nazis. This is why it is important to have free discussion: to refine and flesh out political opinion.

    “You don’t get to do the proverbial yelling of “Fire!” in a crowded theater when there isn’t one. ”

    Yeah and if S 720 passes you’ll get seven years in the pen for supporting BDS.

    Read More
  54. Jake says:
    @War for Blair Mountain
    Saker

    You and the Hindus and the Muslims don't mind enjoying the full benefits of the Anglo Saxon conquest of North America...

    Those benefits include, they feature,: 1) Jews as the now dominant partner in a culture war against the vast majority of white Christians; 2) blacks as the sacred cow race used to be the low IQ riot squad and sponge sucking up the wealth of the non-rich whites; 3) gays made another sacred cow, to the extent of insanity that we see with transgendersim; 4) Moslems made yet another sacred cow, including by Jews, which is utterly insane; 5) unrelenting war to damn and then obliterate America’s conservative white Christian past.

    Are you in favor of those benefits?

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    When the Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class is demographically eleminated across America...The Hindus in Charlottesville will get to enjoy the full benefits of the Anglo Saxon conquest of North America. And White Liberal Tears for the American Injun will be quickly flushed down the toilet bowl.... never to be heard from again.
  55. Joe Hide says:

    Saker,
    Great great great article. Great different ways to look at what we already know, great descriptions of things we didnt know, and great listing of potential solutions.
    I’m still a great Trump fan, mostly because his election and Presidency has stirred up a hornets nest of opposing views …. what with everywhere “Citizen’s Surveillance” because everyone has cell phones, instant internet posting, and access to millions of on-line discussions. We live in the most informational dense time in human existence, in no small part due to Your insightful articles and the comments which get attached. Keep it up Saker!

    Read More
  56. This is utterly silly. Did Bannon really have so much influence over Trump that his dismissal justifies the wild panic it has set off? I have always believed that the real power behind the throne in the Trump White House was, and still is, Ivanka. All that is really happening is that Ivanka is slowly eliminating her rivals.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sowhat
    I would enjoy exploring your rationale. Would you happen to have chapter and verse?
  57. Jake says:
    @Cyrano
    The reason why the Anglo-Saxon elites of the US will milk the holocaust for propaganda purposes forever is because it makes them the good guys. The holocaust did happen, but it has been so over exploited by US and the chosen ones that it’s starting to lose its appeal.

    At the closing stages of WW2 when the Russians first reported the atrocities that they discovered in the liberated concentration camps, the US elites refused to believe that their Anglo-Saxon brothers, a highly civilized nation such as they were, would commit such barbarities. They called it – of course – communist propaganda. When the evidence became overwhelming, the US elites had to regroup and come up with a new strategy to exploit this newly developed situation.

    What they came up with was this: Primary victors of WW2 were the communists, the victory in WW2 is easily attributable to USSR to the tune of at least 80%. The primary victims of WW2 in absolute numbers were also the citizens of the same communist country – USSR , 26 million of them died.

    This was really a bad material for propaganda which can serve US interests. It definitely wasn’t in their interest to promote the communists as the biggest victims and victors of WW2.Then the brilliant idea occurred to them, what if we declare the Jews as the primary victims of WW2 (which in all fairness they were in terms of % of their population exterminated in Europe, but not in absolute numbers)?

    Nevertheless, by designating the Jews as the primary victims of WW2 and coming out as their biggest supporters – the US became the ultimate good guys of WW2. Nazis were vilified for obvious reasons, communists can’t be the good guys no matter what, but being the biggest friends of the biggest victims, made US the nicest people that participated in WW2. That’s why they can never let go of that story. If they stop supporting the chosen ones, they whole narrative of US being the good guys by association with the biggest victims will collapse, which doesn’t serve the interests of either of them.

    By the way here is my formula for explaining the theory of relativity:

    Chosen people = ubermensch = Exceptional people


    They all talk about the same thing. The first are chosen by God, the second are chosen by Mother Nature (superior genes), and the third ones are chosen by themselves.

    “The reason why the Anglo-Saxon elites of the US will milk the holocaust for propaganda purposes forever is because it makes them the good guys.”

    That is true, but it is NOT the primary reason, not the foundational reason. That reason is that WASP culture is formed by the Reformation hitting the revived Germanic (Anglo-Saxon) sense among the English. WASP culture was crystalized, fully formed, by the start of the English Civil War. WASP culture goes hand in hand with the Puritans, and Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. Judaizing heresy will always breed pro-Jewish culture.

    And that is easily observable in the Purtians. Oliver Cromwell made the deal with Jews, taking their money and granting Jews special privileges that were not available to the vast majority of British Isles white Christians, so he could continue to wage war to exterminate as much of the heritage of Christendom as possible.

    WASP culture has always been pro-Jewish and violently opposed to the interests and desires of the vast majority of non-WASP whites.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    A thought provoking comment.
    Could you, please, expand on that?
    And/or maybe provide some pointers/links/online material?
    , @Bill
    Spot on. Very nice.
  58. Sowhat says:
    @Priss Factor
    Don't Be Evil | Oh Really, Google?

    The Tower of Google. Googliath. We need a lot of Davids.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwggrnlyYGo

    [Sidebar: here I have to admit to my great regret and shame that Russia under Putin is no better than the USA and, frankly, Russia is even worse in many aspects. The sad reality is that the Russian government, under the pious pretext of anti-terrorism, has passed many freedom and privacy crushing laws and that the legal guarantees offered to free speech in Russia are close to zero.

    But this shouldn't be surprising. Russia never had the First Amendment. So, it's Speech culture is closer to that of EU and Canada. US would be the same except for its First Amendment. But had Hillary won, she would have packed the Supreme Court with 'hate speech' judges who would have interpreted the law differently to take away speech rights.
    But then, US almost never practiced absolute free speech for most of its history. Absolute Free Speech only took hold with activism in the 60s, and the ACLU played a significant role in this. The radicals and boomers back then needed more free speech to spread radical ideas and pornography. Now that they got the power, they want to clamp down on free speech. Interestingly, the boomers who did most for free speech have ultimately created a climate that wants to do away with it.

    Though I believe in free speech, it was lack of such protections that made the rise of Putin possible, along with the sidelining of globalist oligarchs.
    After all, the power of free speech will always be dominated by the super-rich who gain control of media and buy up politicians and institutions. A billionaire and a poor person may have same free speech rights, but who has more Power Speech? The billionaire who can buy up media and hire propagandists to his liking.

    Free Speech was a huge boost for oligarchs in the 90s. They had great wealth and bought up all the big media. Berezhovsky was a media mogul in Russia. In order for Putin to gain power and restore some degree of Russian sovereignty, he had to curtail the Power Speech of the oligarchs. Unfortunately, this affected speech rights of the masses. But it also took away Power Speech of the oligarchs. (It's like the anti-terrorist measure in the Moscow theater killed both terrorists and audience members.) As the state gained control of information and news, it could combat the power of Mogul Media financed by globalist oligarchs. Now, this was a bargain with the devil as state-run media have their own problems and commit their own kind of abuses. Also, if globalists take over power in Russia, they will use state media to spread their brand of trash... like BBC does.

    But the fact is expanded free speech in the 90s actually undermined Russian independence and sovereignty. Russian oligarchs, many of them Jewish, in collusion with globalist oligarchs, pretty much came to own the real power of 'free speech' since they gained monopoly control of media. Look how free speech worked in the 1996 election. Yeltsin was very unpopular, but Mogul Media only fed pro-Yeltsin propaganda while vilifying his opponents.

    So, Russian situation is difficult. It would be nice if Russia had more free speech rights. But for now, such will be taken advantage by globalists with the money to take over media and penetrate media-sphere. (But with the rise of internet, Putinism in media control may no longer be necessary. Prior to spread of internet, Big Money meant media monopoly. Moguls could own free speech. But if Russia were to allow free use of internet to all, it would equalize every Russian voice. As there are more Russian patriots than cucks in the Current Russia, free speech on the internet will be good for Russian nationalism. But then, maybe Putin and his circle want a managed and controlled nationalism. Maybe they are too chummy with globalists after all. Also, maybe they are fearful of voices calling for end of corruption and cronyism that are all too rife in Russia.)

    As for China, there are advantages to state control. Though it's repressive and stifling, the Chinese media won't allow the kind of homomaniacal filth that is spread by Western media and its cuck dog media in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Because the West is so dominant in media, finance, and etc, when non-western nations allow free speech, too often the Western narrative and agenda come to dominate. Until non-western nations build up their own power of media and counter-propaganda, their embrace of free speech and open forum will only lead to Western Globalist domination, not least because so many elite non-western professionals are educated in the West.

    Granted, the internet has changed the nature of the game. Prior to the ubiquity of the internet, information and influence were totally dominated by media, academia, and the state. Even in a nation with total free speech protections, only a handful had control of the flow of information. So, Moneyed Speech was the only real effective Free Speech.

    But the rise of the internet changed all that. It was the great equalizer. Some nobody on youtube with catchy style, personality, and interesting take can gain tremendous number of followers and gain as much influence as NY Times or some media giant owned by billionaires. A gork like Pewdiepie was reaching tens of millions of kids. Black Pigeon Speaks' WHY WOMEN DESTROY CIVILIZATION got more than a million views.
    So, even though these internet platforms were owned by super-billionaires, they were empowering nobodies with just a voice. While the internet age made the rich ever richer -- with Bezos taking all of retain and Brin & Zuck grabbing all the platforms -- , it gave voice to even to the poorest. It was the strangest phenom in history. Even as globalist oligarchs took away economic security for the peons, their internet services gave peons a voice like never before. So, Google oligarchs push globalism and grow ever richer while the white middle class sink lower. But stuff like youtube allows middle class and working class peons the means to air their grievances and gain millions of viewers, in some cases more than MSM.

    And this played a role in the election of Trump. And now, the oligarchs are beginning to clamp down on the platform. They fear the beast they've unleashed. It made them richer than ever, but it also gave voice to the peons. Brin and Page may be super-smart and super-rich with the services they provide and market, but in some ways, some peon with youtube channel and lots of audiences have more influence than Brin, Page, Zuck, Bezos, and etc combined simply by making videos and sharing inconvenient ideas.

    In some ways, the internet even has advantage over academia. While academics know much more than the average peon, there's a lot they cannot say in order to keep their positions and careers. If they aren't properly PC or obsequious to the narrative or dogma, they can be fired, demoted, or blacklisted. So, they are always looking over their shoulders. Also, as part of the establishment, they have to be team-players. If they go rogue, they will be fired or shunned.

    But peons have no such worry. They have nothing to lose, so they just shoot their mouths like they feel it. And this means more honesty and courage. Also, peons nowadays can know considerably a lot by doing their own research via the internet. Even though they don't have the kind of access to info that academics and professionals and government operatives do, the internet provides them with lots of research material if they know where to look.

    Prior to the internet, academics had access to tons of stuff while most people had access only to local libraries. Most local libraries had limited collection of books and interlibrary loans were cumbersome. But now, even a peon can gain plenty of information on a host of stuff. And they can know enough to discuss stuff with semi-expertise. Indeed, Wikipedia is an amateur project.

    The oligarchs would not have bothered with all such if Hillary had won and if the official narrative sailed on smoothly. But the peons caught the nationalist bug and they got awfully politically incorrect and began to question the nature of oligarchic power. And Trump won.

    So, Googliath went about de-monetizing the peons. This had nothing to do with complaints by companies. That's all bogus. It was really a means to take away shekels from the peons who served as alternative news people for pennies. Take away those pennies and maybe they'll stop. But the peons kept it up, so now, the hideous Wojcicki ganged up with ADL to strike down entire videos that speak truth to PC tyranny.

    Interestingly, the boomers who did most for free speech have ultimately created a climate that wants to do away with it.

    I may agree with most of your comment. Included within the term- “boomer”,I feel it is far too encompassing in this sentence and, you’ll prbably agree after even a little reflection.

    Read More
  59. Che Guava says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome
    "Pedophiles are the most disgusting form of human on Earth."

    Anti-semite.

    I would just use the ‘LOL’ button but for the one-hour limit.

    The LOL and Troll buttons are always ambiguous, is one LOLling with or at? Is one saying good troll, or the recipient is just a stupid troll? I tend to use both in both ways, doubtless leading to misunderstandings.

    Read, only two days ago, an article on a Jewish site about a Hassidic rabbi (now shunned) who campaigns against man-boy paedo behaviour at ritual baths. It was horrifying.

    Eve Einsler included a seduction of an underaged girl (early teens) in the original version of the horrid Vagina Monologues. ‘Moy vaijina’ etc. She changed the age ref. more recently.

    The vaunted Allen Ginsberg, bad poet, was a founding member of NAMBLA.

    So I am thinking your association made so concisely has reason on its side.

    Read More
  60. @Jake
    Those benefits include, they feature,: 1) Jews as the now dominant partner in a culture war against the vast majority of white Christians; 2) blacks as the sacred cow race used to be the low IQ riot squad and sponge sucking up the wealth of the non-rich whites; 3) gays made another sacred cow, to the extent of insanity that we see with transgendersim; 4) Moslems made yet another sacred cow, including by Jews, which is utterly insane; 5) unrelenting war to damn and then obliterate America's conservative white Christian past.

    Are you in favor of those benefits?

    When the Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class is demographically eleminated across America…The Hindus in Charlottesville will get to enjoy the full benefits of the Anglo Saxon conquest of North America. And White Liberal Tears for the American Injun will be quickly flushed down the toilet bowl…. never to be heard from again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thales the Milesian
    WfBM,

    I sense you have some problems with people like vonBraun, Tesla, Igor Sikorsky, Zworykin, Yul Brynner, Prokofiev, Fermi, Delbrueck ...

    I purposely omitted Szilard, von Neuman, Einstein, Edward Teller...
  61. schrub says:

    In the past The Electronic Frontier Foundation has been the main advocate of freedom on the Internet.

    However, that might be changing. The current chairman of the board at EFF is Bruce Behlendorf.

    Who does Behlendorf work for?

    None other than Alex Soros, son and heir of George Soros. Check him out below. The EFF has so far been strangely silent about the increasing censorship on the Internet.

    http://tau-investment.com/en_US/team/alexander-soros/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dissenter
    Thanks for the information, and then everything fits accordingly.
    It happens that almost every organization including "Whatever Open, Freedom, Frontier and Foundation has something to do with Soros and the controlers in the so called ( by The Saker himself )" deep state".

    So, most probably, as I guessed already quite time ago, the very Saker is part of that "deep state", in the lackey version, of course.
    He sounds quite demagogic when he cries about the freedom of hate-speech for the Nazis ( not neo, since there is nothing new here, not even the hairdo of Spencer is new ) from Daily Stormer or paedophiles who are criminals, when he himself displays a harsh censure at his blog, where any opinion against Trump, Flynn, Bannon, or in favour of leftist ideas, or debunking the blatant lies that systematically are published there about the Bolshevik Revolution, is authomaticaly banned. Not to mention any cuestioning of his ideas, which, in case it appears published, it is only to be object of plain and gross insults by The Saker himself, to then be deleted, leaving only his insults to the guessing of whoever could came after imagining any barbarity said by the banned commenter which originally was not there.
    So, for a man who uses such dirty tricks in his own internet blog, I wonder what arguments he has to accuse the Russians and the Chinese of lacking freedom of speech, since another civilizations, for whom sane speech, could easily mean something completely opposite to what an Americanized Swiss, who had "Mein Kampf" as bedhead book from his teens, understands his biased idea of freedom ( full freedom for him and none for the rest, from what facts show ).

    Not to mention that in a capitalist world, of which he is a convinced promoter ( saying one time after another that everything that could sound communist is nuts ) any internet media outlet has the right of admission, of which he himself makes use in his own site. So, why he does not think the same freedom of right of admission for the Russian and Chinese hosts?

    He simply has an agenda, which consists in spreading the alt-right mantra on "Bolsheviks being as evil, and even more, than Nazis", so as to whithewash the Nazis, since Bolsheviks do not exsit anymore, and this strategy has been designed around the US election for making Trump win, and, after that, spreading International Fascism to the rest of the world, which was the real goal of all the ideologues behind this presidency.

    Why do you think that there is a wave of attacks on monuments dedicated to those ( Communists, International Brigadists, Soviets, Socialists, Anarchists, etc... ) who lost their lives fighting fascism in Europe and around the world right now ?
    Why do yo think that even OTAN twitter account is publishing whitewashing stories about the Nazi collaborators so called "Forest Brothers"?

    And, last, why The Saker, who wears a most visibly banner in his website preposterously claiming "Stop the Empire´s War on Russia" has never said a word about this?
    He might definitely consider changing the banner for "Stop the falling of the US Empire at any cost", to start being a bit honest, then, perhaps, I would consider giving any credibility to what he writes.
  62. Sowhat says:
    @Michael Kenny
    This is utterly silly. Did Bannon really have so much influence over Trump that his dismissal justifies the wild panic it has set off? I have always believed that the real power behind the throne in the Trump White House was, and still is, Ivanka. All that is really happening is that Ivanka is slowly eliminating her rivals.

    I would enjoy exploring your rationale. Would you happen to have chapter and verse?

    Read More
  63. Wally says:
    @Anon
    Right. And the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is democratic and a republic.

    What are you talking about, do you even know?

    Anyway, while you’re babbling, according to Zionists like yourself “that shitty little country” is the only democracy in the Middle East.
    Now that’s hilarious.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Yeah, I've never said that.

    Turkey is a democracy. So is Tunisia. And Lebanon. The rest kind of aren't.
  64. anarchyst says:
    @Wally
    It's revealing that many homosexuals & their groups advocate FOR pedophilia.

    Where' the Limousine Left's outrage at that?

    plus:
    left wing violence forgotten by media
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/08/30/ann-coulter-media-never-ending-hunt-right-wing-violence/

    The entire Charlottesville event was a staged event, a classic strategy of provocation operation which is going to be used as psywar pushing for national imposition of martial law and the deep state coup against Trump and the remnants of the Republic.

    Read on.

    The facts about Charlottesville that the Zionist dominated MSM do not allow:
    http://www.unz.com/article/narrative-collapse-is-charlottesvilles-james-alex-fields-the-next-george-zimmerman/
    and:
    Proof of staging, see video:
    different cars, different driver than alleged driver, photo shopped 'flying people' & crash backgrounds, lot's more.
    It's not difficult, just open your eyes.
    https://youtu.be/o3De-coZyGc

    Charlottesville, a set-up
    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/08/charlottesville_and_its_aftermath_what_if_it_was_a_setup.html

    “We have been working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to, during, and after the rally."
    - Zionist Anita Gray, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League.
    must read: http://www.unz.com/article/how-the-jews-won-the-battle-of-charlottesville/

    You are correct. Homosexuality and pedophilia are inextricably linked. It is ADULT homosexuals who prey on pre-pubescent and teen-age BOYS, recruiting them into the “lifestyle”, before their (normal) heterosexual mores are set.
    The so-called Catholic priest “child abuse sex scandal” was actually homosexual pedophilic recruitment in action. Of course, the “mainstream media” could not afford to offend its readership by calling it by its true definition–homosexual pedophilia.
    It is a loosely-guarded secret that there was (is still?) a “lavender lobby” in the American seminary system. Good, straight, heterosexual candidates for the priesthood were purposely discouraged and de-selected from applying for the priesthood, so that the homosexual types could recruit and appoint “their own kind” to the priesthood. One has to wonder how “high-up” the “lavender lobby” goes…how many bishops and cardinals are part of this sordid group?
    That being said, there is actually MORE homosexual pedophilic behavior among ministers of other faiths, media types and politicians, school and public officials, than there ever was in the Catholic Church. Look at the “pass” pedophiles Jeff Epstein and Bill Clinton get despite their sordid behavior. There is a large pedophilia scandal involving many high-ranking public officials in the UK that is being covered up on “national security” grounds. Sorta tells you something…
    While I am glad this sordid behavior was exposed and is being remedied in the Catholic Church, it is clear that the “lugenpresse” has a visceral hatred of the Catholic Church, splashing Catholic transgressions all over the media while conveniently ignoring the greater numbers outside the Catholic hierarchy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    The RCC is a homosexual, Freemasonic, multi-culti grand lodge. As long as you accept black/Asian priests-popes, you are part of the problem.
  65. Wally says:
    @Anon
    Please identify 3 homosexual groups advocating for pedophilia.

    Read for yourself, simpleton.

    Gays Rights May Open Door for Pedophile Rights
    Democrats have attempted to normalize pedophilia as a sexual orientation

    https://www.infowars.com/gays-rights-may-open-door-for-pedophile-rights/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Good source there. Couldn't find your copy of The Late Great Planet Earth?
  66. Logan says:

    “Need I remind everybody that the Anglos committed a butchery unique in world history: the genocidal extermination of all the ethnic groups of an entire continent (I call that a “pan-genocide”).”

    Which continent is that?

    Read More
  67. Woop says:

    People better realize that its not really about the Nazis. Its about stifling dissent. They dont like the fact that you are not down with their agenda and not buying into what they are selling. You cant very well control the population when they dont like your agenda.

    You mark my words this is just he beginning. Stuff is being taken down that has nothing do with the Nazis. You just have to be accused of being racist, pro-white, whatever…. Than you are toast.

    Speaking as an IT guy there is lot more to this than just hosting web sites. Yes the hosting companies and domain registrars can shut you down by refusing your business. But what happens if you build your own data center – a very costly endeavor I might add and the network companies refuse to allow you access to the Internet backbone because you host stuff that they consider offensive.

    Only a handful of companies control the Internet’s backbone in the USA – what if they decide to not allow you access? It would be very easy for them to refuse too let you tap into the backbone of the Internet. Than it wont matter what hosting company and registrar you have.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    But what happens if you build your own data center – a very costly endeavor I might add and the network companies refuse to allow you access to the Internet backbone because you host stuff that they consider offensive.
     
    That's the crux.

    Actually, building a decent "data center" can be done even at home, really.
    With fibre access to the Internet it could work.

    But, the elephant in the living room is, as you pointed out, the very access to the Internet.
    From local ISP to the backbone.
    All it's required is backbone providers rejecting/filtering out the content.

    Easy, technically, to implement and that's THEIR next step I expect.
    Chinese example.....

    "Alternative" views will get pushed out of mainstream Internet (not totally out because there will always be workarounds).
    Those workarounds will filter out "pub/schoolyard" mentality all over the sphere.
    Good.
  68. fnn says:
    @Parfois
    @ Greg Bacon

    Please don't try to replace Superman Stalin from his position of the most murderous man in human history. Robert Conquest (The Great Terror) was the first to come up with the figure of 60 million although in the second edition of the book he reduced it to a more believable 20 million. The snag is, if you go through the trouble of checking the demographics of the USSR you will not find any decrease of its population except during the WWII years!

    Yes, Yagoda was a nasty piece of shit, like many others of the tribe who jumped into the Communist bandwagon to positions of power and committed atrocities against the Russian people, starting with Trotsy himself when he massacred the rebellious sailors of Kronstadt. But he was not Stalin's executioner - he was very capable of taking the initiative without any prompting from above - and in fact he was executed for his crimes.

    Glad to know that 10 million can now be deducted from Stalin's score!

    The snag is, if you go through the trouble of checking the demographics of the USSR you will not find any decrease of its population except during the WWII years!

    Yeah, the USSR never produced any fake statistics.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cyrano
    Yeah, and there is always "explanation" for everything. If everything else fails - there is always the conspiracy theory.
  69. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    Read for yourself, simpleton.

    Gays Rights May Open Door for Pedophile Rights
    Democrats have attempted to normalize pedophilia as a sexual orientation

    https://www.infowars.com/gays-rights-may-open-door-for-pedophile-rights/

    Good source there. Couldn’t find your copy of The Late Great Planet Earth?

    Read More
  70. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Wally
    What are you talking about, do you even know?

    Anyway, while you're babbling, according to Zionists like yourself "that shitty little country" is the only democracy in the Middle East.
    Now that's hilarious.

    Yeah, I’ve never said that.

    Turkey is a democracy. So is Tunisia. And Lebanon. The rest kind of aren’t.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    Right,because any time a candidate Israel doesn't like wins an election, it means that the nation isn't a democracy . Funny how that works.
  71. Anon says: • Disclaimer

    Time to ban this site too. This site wittingly or unwittingly ‘incites’ violence too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Please identify 3 homosexual groups advocating for pedophilia.


    Homo groups don't explicitly push for pedophilia. And there are many homos who are totally against pedo stuff.

    But there are homo groups with rather cozy ties with pedos. In San Fran, some pedo groups were allowed to march in homo parades.

    A lot of homos are in the 'creative' community, which also has its share of pedo pervs. Just look at the Renaissance, esp with Caravaggio. Paglia said pederasty was long a part of Western cultural tradition. Also, homo boys tend to be pervier at a younger age. So, Milo was only half-kidding when he said HE initiated the sexual fling with a priest. George Too Gay Takei said he loved being molested by a homo boy scouts leader at camp.

    Anyway, most homos don't push pedo stuff explicitly or rhetorically. Rather, all those homos in pop culture and fashion keep sexualizing children. I don't know if higher percentage of Jews are homo, but Jewish homos are esp influential. Walt Disney is now Schwarz Jizzney. When homos in media and entertainment keep sexualizing children and push pornified music videos to kids as 'wholesome' entertainment, culture will become more pedo-pornized.
  72. schrub says:

    Cui bono: who eventually benefits. This is something you always have to keep in mind.

    When you try to discover who was behind Charlottesville you should go back in history and do a little research about who exactly benefitted from the infamous March on Skokie way back in 1977.

    The March on Skokie was supposed to be a proposed march of Nazis through the heavily Jewish town of Skokie, Illinois. News of the proposed march was all over the national media for months before the march was too take place. And I mean ALL over.

    The day of the march finally arrived a few uniformed, ragtag Nazis showed up and then the March simply fizzled out. There was NO actual March Through Skokie

    Cui bono?

    The Anti-Defamation League apparently managed to receive $100 million dollars in additional donations as a result of the publicity about this March and the resulting paranoia..

    A curious thing then happened a short time after this non- March.

    The Leader of the March was someone named Frank Collin. It was revealed that Collin’s original family name was in fact Cohen.

    Did Collin/Cohen then become an object of derision and isolation for his Nazi past in the ensuing years ?

    Not exactly. After the March he seems to have entered a rather luxurious sort of retirement that provides enough (mysterious) funds for him to finance (under his new name Frank Joseph) an expensive, glossy new age, nationally distributed and apparently very heavily money losing magazine. He is still considered readily acceptable among his new age cronies not only despite his Nazi past but despite the fact that Collin/Cohen/Joseph had to serve two years in prison for a pedophilia conviction. His friends seem to be mighty forgiving.

    Who benefitted from Charlottesville? According to the very reliable Palestinian activist Alison Weir, The Anti Defamation League has managed to increase its donations by about 1000% because of it. The Southern Poverty Law Center probably profited accordingly.

    https://israelpalestinenews.org/racist-organization-receives-bonanza-anti-racism-donations/

    It seems like Charlottesville was Skokie all over again.

    Read More
  73. Mulegino1 says:

    As Wally pointed out above, there are the National Socialists with the alleged 6 million and there are the National Socialists without them. That makes all of the difference in the world. Could it just be that the NSDAP were able to successfully tackle catastrophic unemployment, hopeless indebtedness, unbelievable societal and cultural corruption and restore both prosperity and dignity to a nation- all without resorting to usurious slavery? Could it be that the real sin of the “Nazis” was in resorting to the international barter trade and circumventing both the very “semitic” City of London and Wall Street? Could that- and not some outlandish and mad aggressive quest for “lebensraum” and destruction of the world’s “untermenschen” be the real reason that they had to be demonized and destroyed? It sure looks that way, in retrospect. Nobody that I know now, in 2017, will refuse to admit that, in the light of current events, Europe lost the Second World War back in 1945.

    I am a big fan of the Saker, and I understand his visceral anti-Nazism, just as I understand the visceral anti-British sentiments of some of my Irish forebears. The “Great Patriotic War” is far more constitutive of the Russian identity than our own Hollywoodesque “Saving Private Ryan” nonsense is of our American one.

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @nickels
    Yes, although the events in Germany were nothing new in the history of the west. What was new, and why the Germans were so vilified, is that their enemies had, by this time, gained a measure of world domination and immense power.
    Europe lost the war in the 1850s.
    , @Carroll Price
    It never seems to occur to all the Nazis experts that everything they think they know about Nazism (and repeat over and over like faithful little robots) was force-fed to them by a 100% Jewish-owned news media.
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    The role of German barter agreements with Central Europe (German industrial goods swapped for raw materials) in engendering Anglo-American hostility, and the obvious threat this posed to their crisis-ridden parasitical financial system, is discussed by the brilliant libertarian Rothbard here (starting around p. 469 of the PDF):

    https://mises.org/library/history-money-and-banking-united-states-colonial-era-world-war-ii

    More generally, a German-Russian alliance makes too much historical sense, which is why the British have gone to such appalling lengths to prevent it.
    , @Anon
    You seem to suggest that if the Nazis had only arrested Jews, put them in concentration camps, shot a few here and there, and expelled them from their homes -- but not killed them -- that would have made the Nazis totally swell guys. They also, by the way, expelled ethnic Poles from the Warthegau in the name of ethnic cleansing. Still swell? What about the euthanasia program? Swell, nevertheless?

    You tell me. You tell me what you're willing to concede they did and we can talk about whether 6 million Jews matters or not to their reputation. Try to answer without engaging in a tu quoque fallacy. We're talking about the Nazis.
    , @Stonehands
    Damnit! I used my one "agree" upthread.

    Well said.
  74. Sam Shama says:
    @Shahna
    They will.
    And then they will get to you.

    Make no mistake, they aren't interested in some Nazis and pedophiles - are you nuts?
    They're interested in stifling dissent. Nazis and pedophiles is how they get you used to the idea of stifling and how they get the mechanisms in place to make it easy, simple, already a done thing; no debate required - just a little more each time.

    Now it's Nazis and pedophiles, in 6 months time it's The Saker and a year or two from now, it's you.
    It's only by protecting the right of the worst of us to speak today that we can guarantee our own right to speak tomorrow.

    Every theoretical idea, including sociopolitical Rights, come with the understanding that in the practical arena there are limits to the theoretical. Thus when Saker writes the following:

    This is paradoxical, but the countries who are at the forefront of the resistance to the AngloZionist Empire have even less of a culture of freedom, especially on the Internet, than the USA or most EU countries.

    he has in fact, through this apparent paradox, arrived at that simple truth; every government, to a greater or lesser extent, realises that total laissez faire will result in anarchy. The key for successful states are the checks and balances written into their Constitutions. The USA has the best.

    Read More
  75. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer
    @War for Blair Mountain
    Saker

    You and the Hindus and the Muslims don't mind enjoying the full benefits of the Anglo Saxon conquest of North America...

    Given that anglo-saxons enjoyed the ‘full benefits’ of colonising hindu and muslim lands through conquest, is it really that bad if hindus and muslims come here ‘legally’ and earn their wages legally and upon ‘invitation’ (note the word invitation) of the anglo-saxon govts and companies themselves?

    Read More
    • Replies: @War for Blair Mountain
    Wow...you are so clever!!!....not...

    Most Europeans did not enjoy the benefits of colonizing Hindu and Muslim Lands...and it would have been a very good idea if Christian Europe and Christian Russia became friends and annihilated the Ottoman Turks and wiped them off the Planet during the Crimea War Era....so as to put a permanent end to European Christian Women being sold off into Ottoman Slave Markets...


    But your fundamental point is irrelevant...The Historic Native Born White American Majority is under no obligation to tolerate a hostile and arrogant Hindu Fifth Column on American Soil and a hostile and arrogant Muslim Fifth Column....CAIR.. on American Soil voting them into a violently persecuted White racial minority on US Soil.


    The only moral obligation that the Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class has is to secure an existence for their Native Born White American Children as an overwhelming Racial Majority within the borders of America....whether Hindu-Jamaican POTUS Kamala Harris and her hostile Hindu Attorney General Preet Bharra like it or not.....The Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class will not consent to be governed by a hostile Jamaican-Hindu skank POTUS and her highly racialized Hindu Fifth Column Attorney General...

    What I have written above is my answer to Vincent Law's very interesting comments today over at Altright.com.....I fully expect Native Born White American Working Class Racial Tribalism to kick in post-Nov 3 2020....

  76. schrub says:

    A correction: the current board chairman of the Electronic Frontier Foundation is Brian Behlendorf, not Bruce. Check him out below. (scroll down)

    http://tau-investment.com/en_US/team/alexander-soros/

    Read More
  77. Excellent article. What the Saker failed to mention, though, is that the Nazi movement was not only full of pedophiles, but also of gays — the Nazi movement was born at a gay bar in Munich. Paradoxically, the only countries in the past century where gays were in control of the government and homosexuals were interned in concentration camps were Nazi Germany and Castro’s Cuba.
    This may be difficult to understand if you ignore that, contrary to what has been spoon fed to us by the media presstitutes and the academia, gay and homosexual are not synonyms, but the terms denote two very different concepts. Of course, the fact that gay and homosexual are two very different things is perhaps the best-kept secret of the gay movement.
    For the difference between gay and homosexual see Servando Gonzalez, Psychological Warfare and the New World order, pp. 236-241.

    Read More
  78. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/30/nationalise-google-facebook-amazon-data-monopoly-platform-public-interest

    I would argue the threat to free speech comes not so much from monopoly per se but ethno-monopoly. After all, Youtube got ADL, not BDS, to censor videos. So, rules of censorship has a ethno-bias.

    Also, much of the blame must go to academia and media that spread the culture of PC far and wide. Corporations are conforming to the kind of PC pushed by The Guardian and its ilk. Most elites focus on success and get their values from educators at elite colleges and think thanks. They are all PC.

    Nationalization is not a good idea. It will just lead to government censorship.

    What the state should do is regulate certain internet near-monopolies or oligopolies as utilities.
    Keep it private but make it serve the public good in fairness to all.

    After Charlottesville — where a Jewish mayor pulled a dirty trick — , Google didn’t just deny platform to Daily Stormer but took down Andy Nowicki’s Alternative Right that had always denounced Anglin as a loony and phony. Nowicki and Liddell were nowhere near Charlottesville.

    They got the blog going again at wordpress, but how long will that last?

    https://www.blogger.com/blogin.g?blogspotURL=https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/

    https://alternativeright.blog/

    Read More
    • Replies: @nsa
    Surprise, surprise.........Joogle took down the DailyStormer site. Imagine that. And Joogle continues to heavily censor its JooTube content. Who woulda thunk..........
    , @Intelligent Dasein

    Google didn’t just deny platform to Daily Stormer but took down Andy Nowicki’s Alternative Right that had always denounced Anglin as a loony and phony.
     
    After careful consideration, I am now fairly certain that Anglin is a loony and a phony, myself. The one good thing about the Stormer being down is that I will no longer be pestered by that idiotic White Sharia crap, which had to have been just about the stupidest meme ever invented.
  79. nickels says:
    @Mulegino1
    As Wally pointed out above, there are the National Socialists with the alleged 6 million and there are the National Socialists without them. That makes all of the difference in the world. Could it just be that the NSDAP were able to successfully tackle catastrophic unemployment, hopeless indebtedness, unbelievable societal and cultural corruption and restore both prosperity and dignity to a nation- all without resorting to usurious slavery? Could it be that the real sin of the "Nazis" was in resorting to the international barter trade and circumventing both the very "semitic" City of London and Wall Street? Could that- and not some outlandish and mad aggressive quest for "lebensraum" and destruction of the world's "untermenschen" be the real reason that they had to be demonized and destroyed? It sure looks that way, in retrospect. Nobody that I know now, in 2017, will refuse to admit that, in the light of current events, Europe lost the Second World War back in 1945.

    I am a big fan of the Saker, and I understand his visceral anti-Nazism, just as I understand the visceral anti-British sentiments of some of my Irish forebears. The "Great Patriotic War" is far more constitutive of the Russian identity than our own Hollywoodesque "Saving Private Ryan" nonsense is of our American one.

    Yes, although the events in Germany were nothing new in the history of the west. What was new, and why the Germans were so vilified, is that their enemies had, by this time, gained a measure of world domination and immense power.
    Europe lost the war in the 1850s.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nickels
    (Which is not to ignore the brutality of the Germans, just their being singled out as the villians of all time when it is clear than other regimes were far more murderous.)
    , @Priss Factor
    Yes, although the events in Germany were nothing new in the history of the west.

    While I think it's wrong and stupid to sacralize the Holocaust into a neo-religion and turn 6 million into a catechism, it's disingenuous to say there wasn't something especially sinister about it.

    True, there have been other mass killings and atrocities in the 20th century and all of human history.
    But a confluence of factors make the Holocaust seem especially sinister.

    It's true that US has committed massive horrors in Japan, Korea, Vietnam. Some of those bombings were near-genocidal. In the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US seemed to argue that it had to carry out micro-genocide to prevent macro-genocide(that would result from full invasion of Japan). Of course, one may ask why the US had to press for unconditional surrender.
    Still, the fact remains the US had no ideological design to wipe out an entire people. And even though Warmongers were ruthless and heartless and even though many Americans did harbor racial animus against another people, there was no explicit ideology that said 'Japs' are subhuman and must be wiped out to every man, woman, and child.

    But Nazism had such an ideology, and ideology does matter.

    Suppose I belong to a community and feel much anger about my community being attacked by another community, and suppose my people take revenge and attack the other community and kill 1000.

    In the other scenario, suppose I belong to a community that believes the other community is subhuman and should be wiped out, and we attack and manage to kill 1000.

    Are the two acts of violence of the same degree because both ended up with 1000 dead?

    No. The second is worse. In the first, my community would have been motivated by rage and anger, desire for revenge and raw justice. But in the second, my community wants to wipe out the other community simply because it is deemed subhuman.
    Also, once the rage is satiated and subsides in the first scenario, my community no longer feels hatred toward the other community. But in the second scenario, my community goes on wanting to wipe out the other community even if we feel no rage or even burning hatred. We feel this contempt for their mere existence.

    In the case of Japan, US was fueled by rage. But once the war ended and rage subsided, Americans wanted to make amends and build good ties with Japan. US carried out war crimes against Japan(who were nasty themselves), but once the peace was at hand, US no longer wanted to hurt or harm the Japanese.
    In contrast, suppose Nazis had won in Russia. Even with victory and peace, the Nazis would have aimed to kill 20 to 30 million Russians and reduce the rest to helot status.
    Consider how both Nazis and Soviets did horrible things to each other. And Soviet rape in Germany was horrible enough. But it was fueled by rage and revenge, not an ideology that said Germans were subhuman. So, when the rage subsided, Russians embraced East Germans as comrades. And this is why communism wasn't as evil as Nazism(even though it was worse than Fascism that rejected radical racism).

    Now, in terms of body count, some of the things done by US, UK, France(esp in Algeria), and etc are comparable to Nazi crimes. But 'comparable' doesn't mean 'equal'.
    It's like there's difference between first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and manslaughter.

    In the case of Japan vs US, the rage was understandable since Japan pulled off a dirty sneak attack.
    In the case of Korea and Vietnam, US crime was one of sheer indifference at the mass slaughter of civilians. As neither nation attacked the US, rage was hardly an issue. Besides, it was US intervention and division of those nations that led to war. Still, there was no ideology to wipe out everyone. This makes US war crimes comparable to Nazi crimes but still not of the same degree.

    There is violence as means and violence as as end. US sometimes used violence as means to achieve what it considered to be commendable goals: containing communism. Once the goal was met, there was no more need for violence.
    But it was different with the Nazis. Even with victory over Russia, they would not have been content with peace. They still would have carried out massive violence against Russians on grounds that they're subhuman. We tend to think of Holocaust as directed only at Jews and consider Russian dead as mere casualties of war. But there was a Nazi design to commit genocide on Russians as well. (This is where Jews miscalculated Nazi pathology. They though its violence would subside once Germans were satiated with revenge against Jews. Many Jews instinctively felt that their community had done bad things to Germans in the interwar yrs. After all, Jews spearheaded communist movements. Many Jews were involved in drugs and prostitution. There were Jews who exploited banking to make big profits while Germans were losing everything. So, when Nazis came to power, many German Jews braced for some hard times. They figured Germans would be understandably nasty for awhile until their rage eventually reached a crescendo and ebbed away. And that may have been the case if not for racial ideology of Nazism. It's like when Pearl Harbor happened, there were American riots against the Japanese-Americans who were dispossessed and herded into camps. But once the war came to a close and rage subsided, Americans lost their hatred. But Nazi Ideology and Hitler's rule meant that Germans would never be satiated until something more radical was done.)

    Anyway, even though it's valid to draw comparisons among various war crimes, ideas do matter. In the end, even if US did similar things that Japan and Germany did, it was still the Good Guy overall cuz it was driven by nobler ideas. This cannot be said today as the US has gone utterly cuckoo with Jewish-Homo Globalist supremacism, waging real wars and 'cold wars' to feed the insatiable appetite of the GLOB that attacks all national sovereignty as an affront to the New Empire with likes of Mark Zuckerberg as Caesar over us all.

    PS. In the 20th century, I would say three or four crimes are comparable to the Holocaust. One may be worse. One is the killing fields by Khmer Rouge, possibly the most insane mass killing ever as it was mostly Cams killing cams. (Khmer Rouge were not only extreme Maoists but ultra radical racists, wiping out non-Cams in Cambodia.) Another is Hutu massacre of Tutsis in Rwanda. But one could argue that Cambodians and Rwandans are not very civilized people, so whaddya expect. The third horror would be US bombing of North Korea that just turned into kill-as-many-people-as-possible. It was an act of utter disregard for civilians. Still, the murderousness was one of indifference than radical hate. And the fact that US was defending the South from the North shows US wasn't targeting all Koreans as a race. Some may include Stalin and Mao's famines, and they were horrible enough, but they were more the results of gross miscalculation and negligence than desire to wipe out millions.

    Anyway, the Nazi Holocaust(against Jews and Russians) seem worse because Germany was a civilized nation with a highly educated populace. As McCarthur said, Japan is like a boy of 14 but Germany, as a full-grown civilization, should have known better. But then, maybe ultra-civilizationism is the problem. After all, civilization grows by NOT tolerating what is deemed uncivilized and low. It is inherently discriminatory and eradicationist. First, it wipes out all dangerous animals. It only keeps those animals that can be pets or domesticated cattle. Second, it wipes out those unfit for Rule of Law... like red savages. Indeed, the reason why the civilized races are less aggressive and wild than Negroes is because of this weeding-out process. In bongo-wongo Africa, if a bunch of guys acted like thugs and chucked spears at rhinos, they were deemed badass and had most women and passed down most genes. But as civilization grew in Middle East, Asia, and Europe, men who acted like that were exiled, killed, or locked up. Thus, their genes got weeded out. (It's too bad slave owners in the South didn't weed out black genes in such manner. So, if a Negro looked and acted like Sonny Liston or Mike Tyson, weed his ass out. Favor the genes of Negroes who look and act like Gary Coleman and Emmanuel Lewis. But then, such gork-Negroes wouldn't have had the strength to carry bales of cotton.)

    Was it 'genocide' to expel American Indians? Or was it comparable to Russian takeover of Siberia and Chinese takeover of Tibet and Xianjiang? And Jewish takeover of Palestine? Anyway, civilization can only be built by suppressing or wiping out savagery or barbarism. If you let such modes of behavior loose, you have Detroit. So, in that sense, it makes sense that the ultra-civlizational agenda of Nazism was bound to be intolerant of anything deemed unworthy. It's like elite institutions keep out most rabble.

    But, Jews and Russians were not barbarians or savages. It seems the Jews were excessively civilized for the Germans. Excessive civilization, according to blood-and-soil Kulturist Germans, leads to cosmopolitanism, rootlessness, decadence, and degeneration. It becomes disassociated with organic blood-and-soil. It becomes obsessed with money than with matter. It disassociates sex from its functions and turns it into a commodity to be traded. As for Russians, they were civilized but apparently not civilized enough to the Germans. And it's true enough that many Russian peasants were hardly in the 20th century. When they invaded Germany, they drank out of toilet bowls and grabbed watches as the greatest treasure. Mario Puzo mentioned a Soviet soldier who thought water came out of the faucet itself. He had no concept of plumbing.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=Ze77qLEAaj4C&pg=PT18&lpg=PT18&dq=mario+puzo+faucet+soviet&source=bl&ots=eofc06ppnv&sig=JAWSydQZh6x2WXGWALgvnJ8uVqw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjxub6FmYLWAhXHrVQKHY5HAXsQ6AEIPDAH#v=onepage&q=mario%20puzo%20faucet%20soviet&f=false

    So, from the POV of Nazis, Jews were excessively civilized to the point of rootlessness and the Russians were not civilized or civilizable enough since they were too close to the soil and dung.

    If we take all of history as a whole, the saddest tragedy is maybe the takeover of South America and Mexico by Europeans. North America was sparsely populated by red savages, so the takeover was easy with limited bloodshed.
    But by some estimates, there were more than 60 million people in what is now called Latin America and diseases wiped out 55 million. Also, unlike red savages in the north, there were hindu-like civilizations in the South. And then, mass rape led to Diversity of mestizo, and then mass slave trade spread ghastly Negroes and mulattoes all over the continent. So, that was a total collapse of indigenous civilizations. Anyway, why is it esp sad? Because most peoples got their lands back. Asians got their lands back from imperialists. Africans and Muslims got their lands back from European imperialists. If anything, they are now colonizing Europe.
    But the indigenous folks of 'Latin America' will never get their lands back. It's lost to Empire of Diversity forever.
  80. schrub says:

    Finally: a very critical article about the Southern Poverty Law Center. Let’s see if this gets any traction.

    http://freebeacon.com/issues/southern-poverty-law-center-transfers-millions-in-cash-to-offshore-entities/

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Corporations fund SPLC for reasons other than fighting 'hate'. It's just a cover. SPLC is a 'guilt-washing' institution as well as an extortion racket.

    A corporation like Apple has lots of skeletons in the closet, especially in the age of globalism with so much worker abuse around the world. So, it can easily be targeted by progs and antifa types. By funding SPLC to gain 'anti-hate' credentials, Apple can avoid 'leftist' ire.

    It's like a store putting up a sign, 'We are progressive, so don't attack and loot us. Get the OTHER businesses."

    It pays Protection Money.
  81. @Anonymous
    Given that anglo-saxons enjoyed the 'full benefits' of colonising hindu and muslim lands through conquest, is it really that bad if hindus and muslims come here 'legally' and earn their wages legally and upon 'invitation' (note the word invitation) of the anglo-saxon govts and companies themselves?

    Wow…you are so clever!!!….not…

    Most Europeans did not enjoy the benefits of colonizing Hindu and Muslim Lands…and it would have been a very good idea if Christian Europe and Christian Russia became friends and annihilated the Ottoman Turks and wiped them off the Planet during the Crimea War Era….so as to put a permanent end to European Christian Women being sold off into Ottoman Slave Markets…

    But your fundamental point is irrelevant…The Historic Native Born White American Majority is under no obligation to tolerate a hostile and arrogant Hindu Fifth Column on American Soil and a hostile and arrogant Muslim Fifth Column….CAIR.. on American Soil voting them into a violently persecuted White racial minority on US Soil.

    The only moral obligation that the Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class has is to secure an existence for their Native Born White American Children as an overwhelming Racial Majority within the borders of America….whether Hindu-Jamaican POTUS Kamala Harris and her hostile Hindu Attorney General Preet Bharra like it or not…..The Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class will not consent to be governed by a hostile Jamaican-Hindu skank POTUS and her highly racialized Hindu Fifth Column Attorney General…

    What I have written above is my answer to Vincent Law’s very interesting comments today over at Altright.com…..I fully expect Native Born White American Working Class Racial Tribalism to kick in post-Nov 3 2020….

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Dont worry she wont be POTUS. She blew her chances by making statements like 'white supremacists'. And preet bhara was/is just doing is legal and constitutional job...even before she came onto the scene. And he is not as powerful or dangerous politically as you think he is. Whether you want to believe it is not....is your call. But thats the truth. He is just one among many attorney generals. He is a political lightweight who wont enter mainstream politics.
    , @Pachyderm Pachyderma
    "...it would have been a very good idea if Christian Europe and Christian Russia became friends..."

    The Russian were just told to shut down the San Francisco consulate and two annexes in New York and Washington.

    , @Needler
    @War-for-Blair-Mountain

    We really enjoy your frustration. None of your predictions will come true and you will continue to be increasingly frustrated and impotent.

    Preet brara and Kamala Harris are irrelevant front-ends you "highly literate and bright non-working class" genius (just as that buttlicking keener Nicky "sellout" Haley is nothing more than a powerless frontend and puppet).

    Have you forgotten that Obama was either a half-Kenyan or half-Indonesian or whatever. There was nothing you could do about that either other than bite a pillow. Get ready for more of the same pillow biting my dear working class white entitled nativist. You can keep burning with jealousy as bright and successful immigrants continue to rise to the top . Only a loser relies on corrupt entitlement of tribal /white-racial/nativist affiliation to protect his job rather than having the manhood to fight for his success based on his own competitiveness & hardwork. Yours represents the mindset of lazy entitled slobs who would rather wallow in some corrupt "right of tribe" entitlement rather that work hard and be competitive. The girly level of whining this entails is bile inducing.

    Meanwhile you're too gutless to mention the Anglophile 5th column in your government that eggs the US into wars that benefit the UK and the EU (Madaleine Albright and her pet project of hijacking US Power to destroy the Serbs to create space for EU expansion). Or Anglophile & Europhile 5th columnists traitors in the State Dept and CIA and their neocon allies egging the US into a direct fight with Russia (because the slimely Limeys of west minister can never get over their butthurt agony that their thieving, bloodsucking and drug-dealing British empire was destroyed but the Russian empire stills survives as a superpower in the form of Putin's Asiatic & European Russia.)

    You seem to be too deluded to understand that the biggest reason Trump won was was that Hillary Clinton was the biggest, most putrid and obviously evil bag of sheiss that white Anglo America produced. Most of white working class voters would have voted for Obama over the (now) blowhard in chief, Donald Trump (if Obama could have run for a 3rd term).

  82. @Anon
    Yeah, I've never said that.

    Turkey is a democracy. So is Tunisia. And Lebanon. The rest kind of aren't.

    Right,because any time a candidate Israel doesn’t like wins an election, it means that the nation isn’t a democracy . Funny how that works.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    If I missed a democracy in the Middle East other than those four, please let me know which country/ies it/they is/are.
  83. Just exactly who is a neo-Nazi? Is it someone who displays a swastika? Does he have certain beliefs like, “Hitler was a good guy”? Does he believe Aryans are a superior race? Is he someone who belongs to a political party that does and professes to believe these things? Are we to hate someone for doing one of these things? Or do we fear him as someone who has the power to call some unimaginable horror back from the dead? The bogey man.

    Read More
  84. @Anon
    Time to ban this site too. This site wittingly or unwittingly 'incites' violence too.

    Please identify 3 homosexual groups advocating for pedophilia.

    Homo groups don’t explicitly push for pedophilia. And there are many homos who are totally against pedo stuff.

    But there are homo groups with rather cozy ties with pedos. In San Fran, some pedo groups were allowed to march in homo parades.

    A lot of homos are in the ‘creative’ community, which also has its share of pedo pervs. Just look at the Renaissance, esp with Caravaggio. Paglia said pederasty was long a part of Western cultural tradition. Also, homo boys tend to be pervier at a younger age. So, Milo was only half-kidding when he said HE initiated the sexual fling with a priest. George Too Gay Takei said he loved being molested by a homo boy scouts leader at camp.

    Anyway, most homos don’t push pedo stuff explicitly or rhetorically. Rather, all those homos in pop culture and fashion keep sexualizing children. I don’t know if higher percentage of Jews are homo, but Jewish homos are esp influential. Walt Disney is now Schwarz Jizzney. When homos in media and entertainment keep sexualizing children and push pornified music videos to kids as ‘wholesome’ entertainment, culture will become more pedo-pornized.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig

    Walt Disney is now Schwarz Jizzney.
     
    Good one, Priss! Too bad I already used up my LOL for the hour.
  85. @schrub
    Finally: a very critical article about the Southern Poverty Law Center. Let's see if this gets any traction.

    http://freebeacon.com/issues/southern-poverty-law-center-transfers-millions-in-cash-to-offshore-entities/

    Corporations fund SPLC for reasons other than fighting ‘hate’. It’s just a cover. SPLC is a ‘guilt-washing’ institution as well as an extortion racket.

    A corporation like Apple has lots of skeletons in the closet, especially in the age of globalism with so much worker abuse around the world. So, it can easily be targeted by progs and antifa types. By funding SPLC to gain ‘anti-hate’ credentials, Apple can avoid ‘leftist’ ire.

    It’s like a store putting up a sign, ‘We are progressive, so don’t attack and loot us. Get the OTHER businesses.”

    It pays Protection Money.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Again, good one.

    I can remember that, as late as the 90s, most progs and leftists were still opposed to globalization. Remember the 'Black Bloc' anarchists smashing windows at the "Battle of Seattle" WTO Convention in 1999? Then came the Bush Administration and ... where were they suddenly? I don't remember any of them protesting the Iraq War, the PATRIOT Act, PRISM or anything else. Or how about during the Obama Administration? Again, I never remember seeing any balaclavaed faces at the Occupy Wall Street protests. But then suddenly, Trump gets elected, and it's like Hurricane Harvey pouring down Antifa all over the place. But where were they for 18 long years?

    Rather than protection money, I think basically what has happened is that these globalist CEOs, corporations, and gazillionaires have just bought out all the prog protest groups, and are now more or less using them to target their enemies, such as the alt-Right. Isn't it true that that home of protectionism, nativism and non-interventionism is now on the alt-Right? That makes us their #1 enemy at the moment. We know for a fact that Soros is armpit-deep in financing prog protest movements both domestically and abroad. And I'm pretty sure he's not the only one.

    Be ware of Rich Spencer, by the way. Even if he isn't an out-and-out plant, he's about the least media-savvy activist I can think of.

  86. nsa says:
    @Priss Factor
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/30/nationalise-google-facebook-amazon-data-monopoly-platform-public-interest

    I would argue the threat to free speech comes not so much from monopoly per se but ethno-monopoly. After all, Youtube got ADL, not BDS, to censor videos. So, rules of censorship has a ethno-bias.

    Also, much of the blame must go to academia and media that spread the culture of PC far and wide. Corporations are conforming to the kind of PC pushed by The Guardian and its ilk. Most elites focus on success and get their values from educators at elite colleges and think thanks. They are all PC.

    Nationalization is not a good idea. It will just lead to government censorship.

    What the state should do is regulate certain internet near-monopolies or oligopolies as utilities.
    Keep it private but make it serve the public good in fairness to all.

    After Charlottesville -- where a Jewish mayor pulled a dirty trick -- , Google didn't just deny platform to Daily Stormer but took down Andy Nowicki's Alternative Right that had always denounced Anglin as a loony and phony. Nowicki and Liddell were nowhere near Charlottesville.

    They got the blog going again at wordpress, but how long will that last?

    https://www.blogger.com/blogin.g?blogspotURL=https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/

    https://alternativeright.blog/

    Surprise, surprise………Joogle took down the DailyStormer site. Imagine that. And Joogle continues to heavily censor its JooTube content. Who woulda thunk……….

    Read More
  87. @Priss Factor
    Please identify 3 homosexual groups advocating for pedophilia.


    Homo groups don't explicitly push for pedophilia. And there are many homos who are totally against pedo stuff.

    But there are homo groups with rather cozy ties with pedos. In San Fran, some pedo groups were allowed to march in homo parades.

    A lot of homos are in the 'creative' community, which also has its share of pedo pervs. Just look at the Renaissance, esp with Caravaggio. Paglia said pederasty was long a part of Western cultural tradition. Also, homo boys tend to be pervier at a younger age. So, Milo was only half-kidding when he said HE initiated the sexual fling with a priest. George Too Gay Takei said he loved being molested by a homo boy scouts leader at camp.

    Anyway, most homos don't push pedo stuff explicitly or rhetorically. Rather, all those homos in pop culture and fashion keep sexualizing children. I don't know if higher percentage of Jews are homo, but Jewish homos are esp influential. Walt Disney is now Schwarz Jizzney. When homos in media and entertainment keep sexualizing children and push pornified music videos to kids as 'wholesome' entertainment, culture will become more pedo-pornized.

    Walt Disney is now Schwarz Jizzney.

    Good one, Priss! Too bad I already used up my LOL for the hour.

    Read More
  88. Dissenter says:
    @schrub
    In the past The Electronic Frontier Foundation has been the main advocate of freedom on the Internet.

    However, that might be changing. The current chairman of the board at EFF is Bruce Behlendorf.

    Who does Behlendorf work for?

    None other than Alex Soros, son and heir of George Soros. Check him out below. The EFF has so far been strangely silent about the increasing censorship on the Internet.

    http://tau-investment.com/en_US/team/alexander-soros/

    Thanks for the information, and then everything fits accordingly.
    It happens that almost every organization including “Whatever Open, Freedom, Frontier and Foundation has something to do with Soros and the controlers in the so called ( by The Saker himself )” deep state”.

    So, most probably, as I guessed already quite time ago, the very Saker is part of that “deep state”, in the lackey version, of course.
    He sounds quite demagogic when he cries about the freedom of hate-speech for the Nazis ( not neo, since there is nothing new here, not even the hairdo of Spencer is new ) from Daily Stormer or paedophiles who are criminals, when he himself displays a harsh censure at his blog, where any opinion against Trump, Flynn, Bannon, or in favour of leftist ideas, or debunking the blatant lies that systematically are published there about the Bolshevik Revolution, is authomaticaly banned. Not to mention any cuestioning of his ideas, which, in case it appears published, it is only to be object of plain and gross insults by The Saker himself, to then be deleted, leaving only his insults to the guessing of whoever could came after imagining any barbarity said by the banned commenter which originally was not there.
    So, for a man who uses such dirty tricks in his own internet blog, I wonder what arguments he has to accuse the Russians and the Chinese of lacking freedom of speech, since another civilizations, for whom sane speech, could easily mean something completely opposite to what an Americanized Swiss, who had “Mein Kampf” as bedhead book from his teens, understands his biased idea of freedom ( full freedom for him and none for the rest, from what facts show ).

    Not to mention that in a capitalist world, of which he is a convinced promoter ( saying one time after another that everything that could sound communist is nuts ) any internet media outlet has the right of admission, of which he himself makes use in his own site. So, why he does not think the same freedom of right of admission for the Russian and Chinese hosts?

    He simply has an agenda, which consists in spreading the alt-right mantra on “Bolsheviks being as evil, and even more, than Nazis”, so as to whithewash the Nazis, since Bolsheviks do not exsit anymore, and this strategy has been designed around the US election for making Trump win, and, after that, spreading International Fascism to the rest of the world, which was the real goal of all the ideologues behind this presidency.

    Why do you think that there is a wave of attacks on monuments dedicated to those ( Communists, International Brigadists, Soviets, Socialists, Anarchists, etc… ) who lost their lives fighting fascism in Europe and around the world right now ?
    Why do yo think that even OTAN twitter account is publishing whitewashing stories about the Nazi collaborators so called “Forest Brothers”?

    And, last, why The Saker, who wears a most visibly banner in his website preposterously claiming “Stop the Empire´s War on Russia” has never said a word about this?
    He might definitely consider changing the banner for “Stop the falling of the US Empire at any cost”, to start being a bit honest, then, perhaps, I would consider giving any credibility to what he writes.

    Read More
  89. nickels says:
    @nickels
    Yes, although the events in Germany were nothing new in the history of the west. What was new, and why the Germans were so vilified, is that their enemies had, by this time, gained a measure of world domination and immense power.
    Europe lost the war in the 1850s.

    (Which is not to ignore the brutality of the Germans, just their being singled out as the villians of all time when it is clear than other regimes were far more murderous.)

    Read More
  90. @Priss Factor
    Corporations fund SPLC for reasons other than fighting 'hate'. It's just a cover. SPLC is a 'guilt-washing' institution as well as an extortion racket.

    A corporation like Apple has lots of skeletons in the closet, especially in the age of globalism with so much worker abuse around the world. So, it can easily be targeted by progs and antifa types. By funding SPLC to gain 'anti-hate' credentials, Apple can avoid 'leftist' ire.

    It's like a store putting up a sign, 'We are progressive, so don't attack and loot us. Get the OTHER businesses."

    It pays Protection Money.

    Again, good one.

    I can remember that, as late as the 90s, most progs and leftists were still opposed to globalization. Remember the ‘Black Bloc’ anarchists smashing windows at the “Battle of Seattle” WTO Convention in 1999? Then came the Bush Administration and … where were they suddenly? I don’t remember any of them protesting the Iraq War, the PATRIOT Act, PRISM or anything else. Or how about during the Obama Administration? Again, I never remember seeing any balaclavaed faces at the Occupy Wall Street protests. But then suddenly, Trump gets elected, and it’s like Hurricane Harvey pouring down Antifa all over the place. But where were they for 18 long years?

    Rather than protection money, I think basically what has happened is that these globalist CEOs, corporations, and gazillionaires have just bought out all the prog protest groups, and are now more or less using them to target their enemies, such as the alt-Right. Isn’t it true that that home of protectionism, nativism and non-interventionism is now on the alt-Right? That makes us their #1 enemy at the moment. We know for a fact that Soros is armpit-deep in financing prog protest movements both domestically and abroad. And I’m pretty sure he’s not the only one.

    Be ware of Rich Spencer, by the way. Even if he isn’t an out-and-out plant, he’s about the least media-savvy activist I can think of.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    Be ware of Rich Spencer, by the way. Even if he isn’t an out-and-out plant, he’s about the least media-savvy activist I can think of.

    In a way, that's why I like him. He's blunt and forthright about things.

    And Alt Right must be a blunt instrument than a violin.

    Truth is a statement, not a song.
  91. yeah says:
    @Intelligent Dasein
    I'm not entirely sure what to make of this article, but my general opinion is that Saker is focusing on the wrong aspects of the overall situation.

    As far as these huge internet technopolies go (e.g. Facebook, Google, Youtube), I believe that they will be defunct in 5 to 10 years anyway, along with most of what we currently call the internet. The world is visibly marching towards an extreme day of economic reckoning and massive military escalation. Tech companies, which are basically profitless, cash-burning furnaces that produce nothing of value and are strategic liabilities given the ease of electronic espionage and cyber-attacks, are simply not going to survive the fin de siecle. The social mood will turn against their whole twerpy, metrosexual elan, and the trade wars with China will spell an end to the importation of cheap electronics from the sweatshops of the East. When the next iPhone costs $3500 and comes with a mandatory social justice speech code, most Americans will find that they do not want one, nor will they be able to afford one.

    It is wrong to look at the current de-platforming solely in the context of "free speech." Free speech, which has never existed in fact, is simply a catchword regularly employed by anyone wishing to challenge the reigning authorities. As a Traditional Catholic, I hold to the adage that "error has no rights." Therefore I am not in principle opposed to placing limits on what can be said in public. The battle of ideas, which is a battle in the metaphorical sense only, must eventually become an an actual battle of arrayed forces, factions, tactics, subterfuge, and violence. This is where we are today. The divisions throughout Western society are both real and deep and vitally consequential; they can no longer be papered over by the illusion of a common polity, nor held in check by imperial force. One part of the mass insanity currently gripping the West is the delusion that meaningless concepts like social justice, racial equality, and technological innovation actually matter in the long run, that they have some substantive reality about them. That delusion is about to be dispelled.

    The crackdown by tech companies on unapproved speech is only a footnote in the larger story. It is important in the immediate present, but it will soon be swept away by broader trends. This is not yet the Civil War; it is not even Fort Sumter; it is the preliminary spray of flysheets and grandstanding before the situation turns serious. But it must be remembered that the war is coming. The age of compromise is at an end.

    You make some very interesting points and I salute you for your bravery in outright heresy. However, I fear you may be wrong, even as a part of me is equally sick and tired of what has come to be regarded as “Progress”.

    If times do indeed turn towards major war and destruction, it is not just the IT world and its social media culture that will take a hit. Everything will collapse, 99% of everything that can be traced back to the industrial revolution. Short of that, social media and its culture of banality, self-absorption, and devotion to the flim-flams and gizmos of technology will survive. Facebook is not just a company or a product, it has become “Life” itself, and is Soma for alienated minds.

    The dogmas of political correctness and the obsessions with gender and identity are beasts that have to be fought apart and separate from the struggle for a better balance in free speech. Reason and Logic will have to be rediscovered and reintroduced into public discourse. If that human quest succeeds, obsessive and juvenile infatuations with social media, identity politics and the like will evaporate on their own.

    Read More
  92. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Chris Mallory
    Right,because any time a candidate Israel doesn't like wins an election, it means that the nation isn't a democracy . Funny how that works.

    If I missed a democracy in the Middle East other than those four, please let me know which country/ies it/they is/are.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    Egypt had elections, but Israel didn't like who won, so the army took over. The Palestinians hold elections, but Israel doesn't like who wins, so they don't count. Iran holds democratic elections. But the Iranians are hiding nukes under BiBi's bed, so we can't count them.



    Turkey isn't much of a democracy, if they held honest elections the Muslim Brotherhood would win in a landslide.
  93. @nickels
    Yes, although the events in Germany were nothing new in the history of the west. What was new, and why the Germans were so vilified, is that their enemies had, by this time, gained a measure of world domination and immense power.
    Europe lost the war in the 1850s.

    Yes, although the events in Germany were nothing new in the history of the west.

    While I think it’s wrong and stupid to sacralize the Holocaust into a neo-religion and turn 6 million into a catechism, it’s disingenuous to say there wasn’t something especially sinister about it.

    True, there have been other mass killings and atrocities in the 20th century and all of human history.
    But a confluence of factors make the Holocaust seem especially sinister.

    It’s true that US has committed massive horrors in Japan, Korea, Vietnam. Some of those bombings were near-genocidal. In the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US seemed to argue that it had to carry out micro-genocide to prevent macro-genocide(that would result from full invasion of Japan). Of course, one may ask why the US had to press for unconditional surrender.
    Still, the fact remains the US had no ideological design to wipe out an entire people. And even though Warmongers were ruthless and heartless and even though many Americans did harbor racial animus against another people, there was no explicit ideology that said ‘Japs’ are subhuman and must be wiped out to every man, woman, and child.

    But Nazism had such an ideology, and ideology does matter.

    Suppose I belong to a community and feel much anger about my community being attacked by another community, and suppose my people take revenge and attack the other community and kill 1000.

    In the other scenario, suppose I belong to a community that believes the other community is subhuman and should be wiped out, and we attack and manage to kill 1000.

    Are the two acts of violence of the same degree because both ended up with 1000 dead?

    No. The second is worse. In the first, my community would have been motivated by rage and anger, desire for revenge and raw justice. But in the second, my community wants to wipe out the other community simply because it is deemed subhuman.
    Also, once the rage is satiated and subsides in the first scenario, my community no longer feels hatred toward the other community. But in the second scenario, my community goes on wanting to wipe out the other community even if we feel no rage or even burning hatred. We feel this contempt for their mere existence.

    In the case of Japan, US was fueled by rage. But once the war ended and rage subsided, Americans wanted to make amends and build good ties with Japan. US carried out war crimes against Japan(who were nasty themselves), but once the peace was at hand, US no longer wanted to hurt or harm the Japanese.
    In contrast, suppose Nazis had won in Russia. Even with victory and peace, the Nazis would have aimed to kill 20 to 30 million Russians and reduce the rest to helot status.
    Consider how both Nazis and Soviets did horrible things to each other. And Soviet rape in Germany was horrible enough. But it was fueled by rage and revenge, not an ideology that said Germans were subhuman. So, when the rage subsided, Russians embraced East Germans as comrades. And this is why communism wasn’t as evil as Nazism(even though it was worse than Fascism that rejected radical racism).

    Now, in terms of body count, some of the things done by US, UK, France(esp in Algeria), and etc are comparable to Nazi crimes. But ‘comparable’ doesn’t mean ‘equal’.
    It’s like there’s difference between first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and manslaughter.

    In the case of Japan vs US, the rage was understandable since Japan pulled off a dirty sneak attack.
    In the case of Korea and Vietnam, US crime was one of sheer indifference at the mass slaughter of civilians. As neither nation attacked the US, rage was hardly an issue. Besides, it was US intervention and division of those nations that led to war. Still, there was no ideology to wipe out everyone. This makes US war crimes comparable to Nazi crimes but still not of the same degree.

    There is violence as means and violence as as end. US sometimes used violence as means to achieve what it considered to be commendable goals: containing communism. Once the goal was met, there was no more need for violence.
    But it was different with the Nazis. Even with victory over Russia, they would not have been content with peace. They still would have carried out massive violence against Russians on grounds that they’re subhuman. We tend to think of Holocaust as directed only at Jews and consider Russian dead as mere casualties of war. But there was a Nazi design to commit genocide on Russians as well. (This is where Jews miscalculated Nazi pathology. They though its violence would subside once Germans were satiated with revenge against Jews. Many Jews instinctively felt that their community had done bad things to Germans in the interwar yrs. After all, Jews spearheaded communist movements. Many Jews were involved in drugs and prostitution. There were Jews who exploited banking to make big profits while Germans were losing everything. So, when Nazis came to power, many German Jews braced for some hard times. They figured Germans would be understandably nasty for awhile until their rage eventually reached a crescendo and ebbed away. And that may have been the case if not for racial ideology of Nazism. It’s like when Pearl Harbor happened, there were American riots against the Japanese-Americans who were dispossessed and herded into camps. But once the war came to a close and rage subsided, Americans lost their hatred. But Nazi Ideology and Hitler’s rule meant that Germans would never be satiated until something more radical was done.)

    Anyway, even though it’s valid to draw comparisons among various war crimes, ideas do matter. In the end, even if US did similar things that Japan and Germany did, it was still the Good Guy overall cuz it was driven by nobler ideas. This cannot be said today as the US has gone utterly cuckoo with Jewish-Homo Globalist supremacism, waging real wars and ‘cold wars’ to feed the insatiable appetite of the GLOB that attacks all national sovereignty as an affront to the New Empire with likes of Mark Zuckerberg as Caesar over us all.

    PS. In the 20th century, I would say three or four crimes are comparable to the Holocaust. One may be worse. One is the killing fields by Khmer Rouge, possibly the most insane mass killing ever as it was mostly Cams killing cams. (Khmer Rouge were not only extreme Maoists but ultra radical racists, wiping out non-Cams in Cambodia.) Another is Hutu massacre of Tutsis in Rwanda. But one could argue that Cambodians and Rwandans are not very civilized people, so whaddya expect. The third horror would be US bombing of North Korea that just turned into kill-as-many-people-as-possible. It was an act of utter disregard for civilians. Still, the murderousness was one of indifference than radical hate. And the fact that US was defending the South from the North shows US wasn’t targeting all Koreans as a race. Some may include Stalin and Mao’s famines, and they were horrible enough, but they were more the results of gross miscalculation and negligence than desire to wipe out millions.

    Anyway, the Nazi Holocaust(against Jews and Russians) seem worse because Germany was a civilized nation with a highly educated populace. As McCarthur said, Japan is like a boy of 14 but Germany, as a full-grown civilization, should have known better. But then, maybe ultra-civilizationism is the problem. After all, civilization grows by NOT tolerating what is deemed uncivilized and low. It is inherently discriminatory and eradicationist. First, it wipes out all dangerous animals. It only keeps those animals that can be pets or domesticated cattle. Second, it wipes out those unfit for Rule of Law… like red savages. Indeed, the reason why the civilized races are less aggressive and wild than Negroes is because of this weeding-out process. In bongo-wongo Africa, if a bunch of guys acted like thugs and chucked spears at rhinos, they were deemed badass and had most women and passed down most genes. But as civilization grew in Middle East, Asia, and Europe, men who acted like that were exiled, killed, or locked up. Thus, their genes got weeded out. (It’s too bad slave owners in the South didn’t weed out black genes in such manner. So, if a Negro looked and acted like Sonny Liston or Mike Tyson, weed his ass out. Favor the genes of Negroes who look and act like Gary Coleman and Emmanuel Lewis. But then, such gork-Negroes wouldn’t have had the strength to carry bales of cotton.)

    Was it ‘genocide’ to expel American Indians? Or was it comparable to Russian takeover of Siberia and Chinese takeover of Tibet and Xianjiang? And Jewish takeover of Palestine? Anyway, civilization can only be built by suppressing or wiping out savagery or barbarism. If you let such modes of behavior loose, you have Detroit. So, in that sense, it makes sense that the ultra-civlizational agenda of Nazism was bound to be intolerant of anything deemed unworthy. It’s like elite institutions keep out most rabble.

    But, Jews and Russians were not barbarians or savages. It seems the Jews were excessively civilized for the Germans. Excessive civilization, according to blood-and-soil Kulturist Germans, leads to cosmopolitanism, rootlessness, decadence, and degeneration. It becomes disassociated with organic blood-and-soil. It becomes obsessed with money than with matter. It disassociates sex from its functions and turns it into a commodity to be traded. As for Russians, they were civilized but apparently not civilized enough to the Germans. And it’s true enough that many Russian peasants were hardly in the 20th century. When they invaded Germany, they drank out of toilet bowls and grabbed watches as the greatest treasure. Mario Puzo mentioned a Soviet soldier who thought water came out of the faucet itself. He had no concept of plumbing.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=Ze77qLEAaj4C&pg=PT18&lpg=PT18&dq=mario+puzo+faucet+soviet&source=bl&ots=eofc06ppnv&sig=JAWSydQZh6x2WXGWALgvnJ8uVqw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjxub6FmYLWAhXHrVQKHY5HAXsQ6AEIPDAH#v=onepage&q=mario%20puzo%20faucet%20soviet&f=false

    So, from the POV of Nazis, Jews were excessively civilized to the point of rootlessness and the Russians were not civilized or civilizable enough since they were too close to the soil and dung.

    If we take all of history as a whole, the saddest tragedy is maybe the takeover of South America and Mexico by Europeans. North America was sparsely populated by red savages, so the takeover was easy with limited bloodshed.
    But by some estimates, there were more than 60 million people in what is now called Latin America and diseases wiped out 55 million. Also, unlike red savages in the north, there were hindu-like civilizations in the South. And then, mass rape led to Diversity of mestizo, and then mass slave trade spread ghastly Negroes and mulattoes all over the continent. So, that was a total collapse of indigenous civilizations. Anyway, why is it esp sad? Because most peoples got their lands back. Asians got their lands back from imperialists. Africans and Muslims got their lands back from European imperialists. If anything, they are now colonizing Europe.
    But the indigenous folks of ‘Latin America’ will never get their lands back. It’s lost to Empire of Diversity forever.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nickels
    Points taken, and I did end my comment with an addendum in that direction.
    Expelling was certainly nothing new.
    And, per Irving, it is not clear that the ideology was more than years of pent up anger and rhetoric. Irving argues that, in the end, the Furher only wanted exportation and that his weak control of the generals (coupled with his previous rhetoric) led to unsanctioned violence in the form of murderous thuggery.
    Seemingly Stalin's extinction of the kulaks is in this realm.
    The fog of centuries of propaganda, NPR poetry pieces, movies, school indoctrination at every level--all makes it difficult to know where true parity lies.
    It will all culminate in the AntiChrist, in time.
  94. @Seamus Padraig
    Again, good one.

    I can remember that, as late as the 90s, most progs and leftists were still opposed to globalization. Remember the 'Black Bloc' anarchists smashing windows at the "Battle of Seattle" WTO Convention in 1999? Then came the Bush Administration and ... where were they suddenly? I don't remember any of them protesting the Iraq War, the PATRIOT Act, PRISM or anything else. Or how about during the Obama Administration? Again, I never remember seeing any balaclavaed faces at the Occupy Wall Street protests. But then suddenly, Trump gets elected, and it's like Hurricane Harvey pouring down Antifa all over the place. But where were they for 18 long years?

    Rather than protection money, I think basically what has happened is that these globalist CEOs, corporations, and gazillionaires have just bought out all the prog protest groups, and are now more or less using them to target their enemies, such as the alt-Right. Isn't it true that that home of protectionism, nativism and non-interventionism is now on the alt-Right? That makes us their #1 enemy at the moment. We know for a fact that Soros is armpit-deep in financing prog protest movements both domestically and abroad. And I'm pretty sure he's not the only one.

    Be ware of Rich Spencer, by the way. Even if he isn't an out-and-out plant, he's about the least media-savvy activist I can think of.

    Be ware of Rich Spencer, by the way. Even if he isn’t an out-and-out plant, he’s about the least media-savvy activist I can think of.

    In a way, that’s why I like him. He’s blunt and forthright about things.

    And Alt Right must be a blunt instrument than a violin.

    Truth is a statement, not a song.

    Read More
  95. SMK says: • Website
    @Priss Factor
    DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts.

    Stormfront is something that might be called genuinely neo-nazi. It is serious or thinks it is.

    In contrast, Daily Stormer reads like a sendup of neo-nazism, and one could take it almost as parody,and it may well be in the case of Weev, who I think is mainly in it for the notoriety. As for Anglin, some believe he's an agent. He could be. He is such a freak. He looks like some mixed-race redneck inbred retard. And yet, and this is what's strange, he comes across as reasonably intelligent and even thoughtful(if he wants to be). I wish Spencer didn't stoop to sharing a forum with Anglin, but Anglin can come across as half-intelligent if he tries:

    https://youtu.be/Rm-AIZib0io?t=11m40s

    Because he seems too smart to have such retarded views, some say he must be a FBI agent, a plant. But if he is such, why the clampdown on him? But then, maybe that's part of the plan. Anglin acts totally outrageous, and his behavior justifies the shutdown, and that is used to shut down other people as well.

    Also, I don't think most people who went to Daily Stormer went for serious opinions. They just relished the sense of outrage, crank-up of outlandish headlines.

    Still, DS issue is important for free speech. If DS today, what tomorrow? It's the principle that counts.

    I must take issue with the idea that Nazism was abhorrent. If anything, its problem was a kind of pathological normalism. Nazism showed that excessive and radical attention to health, order, normality, and cleanliness can also be a kind of sickness and perversion. It was excessively anti-septic. In contrast, the problem of something like pedophilia, homomania, and etc is they are excessively septic.

    It's like it isn't healthy either to wallow in filth & mud OR be concerned compulsively with purity & cleanliness. Someone who never washes and acts gross is disgusting. But a germ-freak who obsessively-compulsively tries to maintain hygiene and order is also sick. Organism must seek health and order away from mess and chaos, but it must also accept that it too, as a lifeform, is always in a process of growth and decay. Nazism was like life frozen into perfection. It looked good but wasn't organic.
    You can't drink frozen milk. Of course, you can't drink spoiled milk either. Weimar Germany just let the milk of Germany go bad. For milk to turn into useful culture(like yogurt or sour cream), it has to allow certain kinds of germs to grow under certain conditions. That way, milk is both alive as culture and healthy to consume.

    To an extent, elements in Nazism was a healthy reaction to the excesses of Weimar Germany. But then, Nazism, a kind of radical racist Mormonism, went the other extreme and was excessively obsessed with normality, purity, order, beauty, hygiene, and perfection.

    What people need is a kind of humanism that strives for health, order, and normality but also understands that life is, at its core, chaotic, messy, imperfect, and filled with germs. No matter how much one washes, one can only clean the skin, the surface. The body itself if filled with all sorts of bacteria, viruses, and other foreign elements. And there are all sorts of problems of health, emotions, psychology, etc. There is a broad sense of normality, but there is no perfect normal. And even most normal people have tendencies that are abnormal. Humanism urges us to be tolerant and forgiving of imperfections and problems that are inherent to life. Also, abnormality is often the stuff of genius and inspiration in certain individuals.
    But Nazism was so much into normality, beauty, healthy, and striving for perfection that it turned into a kind of perversion in its own right.
    Also, despite the heroic and noble iconography of Nazism with its 'Aryan' art and such, the key figures of Nazism were pathological dark-souled individuals like Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, and etc. In a way, radical normality and cult of perfection were crutches for their sense of insecurity, inferiority, and anxiety. Now, it's okay for people to have anxieties as no one is god or some superhero. Everyone has weaknesses and disadvantages. A smart person can be ugly. A handsome person can be dumb. A beautiful woman can have unpleasant voice, like in SINGING IN THE RAIN. A woman with beautiful voice may not be much of a looker, like those fat broads in opera. But the cretinous leaders of Nazism could never address their own complexes and neuroses and just buried them under the cult of heroism and megalomania. And this repression fueled their neuroses even further.

    Nazism also failed because many sane and sound people with normal dispositions tend to be weak in personality and haven't the will to step forth and take control. A good example would be Albert Speer. He was essentially a decent man but of weak personality. Not the kind to step forth and take charge of things. Instead, such men let others with stronger personality to take center stage. And they latch onto such figures. (We see this with Neocons and cucks too. Whatever one may say about Jews, they have strong forceful personalities and take charge of power, narrative, and authority. Those with weaker personalities, the Peter Keatings of the world, latch onto forceful Jews. Look at cucks like Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Rich Lowry, Lindsey Graham, and etc. McCain has a temper but no personality. These types only know how to latch onto the Strong personality. And today's 'new hitlers' are the Zionist globalist with a diabolical lust for world control. They got super-chutzpah, and weaker-souled white gentile cucks just go along with stuff like 'gay marriage', Russia Hacking hysteria, 'diversity is our strength', and homo symbols in christian churches.)
    This was true of Mao and those around him. Mao had a very strong personality, and others latched onto him. Zhou En-Lai was more sensible and more intelligent, but he didn't have a strong personality. He didn't know how to take charge. So, the strong personality took charge, and others latched onto him.

    Now, over time, as a system becomes firmly established, there is no more need for strong personalities. Look at China today, and it's impossible for anyone like Mao to come to power. And USSR after Stalin's death could no longer tolerate strong personalities. Consensus of Power was what mattered. When Khrushchev was deemed too erratic, they got rid of him, and the system was ruled by a collective politburo. If Nazism had survived, something similar might have happened after Hitler's death. But Hitler came to power in a world of chaos, and in such a time, a man with forceful personality and magnetism had the clear advantage. And Hitler had it. Normal Germans failed to restore order and balance during the Weimar yrs. They lacked the will, guts, courage, and vision. In contrast, Hitler, for all his deficiencies, had those qualities. And for a time, he restored Germany to its greatness. And if he'd died in 1939, it might have been mostly a happy story for Germany. But he lived on, and his pathological nature simply couldn't stop gambling with history as the new Man of Destiny. And normal sane Germans like Albert Speer who'd failed during the Weimar yrs also failed by lacking the will to say NO to Hitler. But then, the opponents of Nazism also deserve much blame because they squandered their chance to create a sane healthy democracy during the Weimar yrs. Those yrs were not only economically catastrophic. People can weather material hard times with morale and dignity under inspired leadership. It was the cultural filth and moral collapse of Germany that led to so much anger and frustration, like in SERPENT EGG by Bergman.

    https://youtu.be/R2nIe1G6R1s?t=7m16s

    https://youtu.be/rAB2qGdh_lY?t=13m22s

    Obviously, Weimar Germany was culturally sick. Granted, there were genuine artistic achievements in many fields in this period, but society as a whole had lost its bearing, much like Russia in the 90s when it too fell prey to globalists. But instead of combating the disease with national humanism or national spiritualism like Putin did, Hitler and co. pushed for the extreme opposite. IF someone is fat disgusting slob, you try to bring him to health. You don't try to make him pump iron and swallow tons of vitamins and protein supplements to become invincible Terminator. But then, Nazism was bound to be contradictory as it was a Radical Normal Ideology led by bohemians and eccentrics. Hitler and Goebbels were would-be artists who felt at ease with bohemian lifestyles. And yet, esp Hitler had mostly bourgeois tastes and was a misfit in the modernist cultural milieu. Hitler's bohemianism felt at odds with respectable society, but his taste for beauty and form made him a misfit among modernism then in rage. If Nazi leaders had been more honest about their own contradictions, they might have found ways to resolve them. But they repressed them and played the role of transcendent visionary saviors of the nation. And so, their complexes fueled their madness further. In a way, their excessive radical normalism was a desperate way to repress their anxieties and neuroses that were more in tune with modernity. Though MAX isn't a very good movie, it does touch on the contradiction of Hitlerism, a 19th century bohemian romantic sensibility trapped in the world of modernity.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jrs7qk503Y

    An eccentric man too discomfited with his obvious strangeness and unable to confront his own demons, thereby seeking escapism in mythic heroism of history as a grand opera. Hitler couldn't confront his demons so he turned them into avenging angels.

    As for pornography, I think it's made all the worse by homomania. Because homos have been sacralized, we aren't supposed to say negative things about dangerous practice of fecal penetration that greatly increases the likelihood of anal cancer. So, it's spread to real-sexual people too. Also, with pornographic images being so ubiquitous, people need extra kink to get excited. Also, with Negro men increasingly conquering white vaginas, white guys feel a need to feel power over women by some 'extreme' act, and that is bungholery. Since there's a good chance that the vagina of some white 'thot' has already been taken by a Negro, the only way a white guy can act like he's conquering the white female is by violating her bungy.

    But far more problematic than porn itself is the pornification of culture, i.e. the barrier that used to exist between porn and rest of culture is rapidly dissolving. Ariana Grande is supposed to be entertainment for young girls, and yet her songs are totally porny. When 10 yr old girls are allowed to attend her concert by her parents, pornification is seeping down to children. And if kids are thus sexualized, doesn't it essentially normalize pedophilia, at least step by step? If pornified pop culture is suitable for kids, it means kids are sexual creatures. If so, why shouldn't they engage in sex? Furthermore, if even elementary school kids are taught about ass-buggery, won't young boys think, "it's okay to have pee pee in my poo poo?" If adults allow young kids to think like this, pedophilia will gradually become normalized.

    The Indian wars and ultimate defeat and dispossession of 3-3.5 million stone-age savages and cannibals -necessary for whites to settle the continent and create the United States- was a “unique” act of “genocide” worse than the Holocaust and the murders and killings of over a 100 million people by communists!

    Read More
  96. peterAUS says:
    @Jake
    "The reason why the Anglo-Saxon elites of the US will milk the holocaust for propaganda purposes forever is because it makes them the good guys."

    That is true, but it is NOT the primary reason, not the foundational reason. That reason is that WASP culture is formed by the Reformation hitting the revived Germanic (Anglo-Saxon) sense among the English. WASP culture was crystalized, fully formed, by the start of the English Civil War. WASP culture goes hand in hand with the Puritans, and Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. Judaizing heresy will always breed pro-Jewish culture.

    And that is easily observable in the Purtians. Oliver Cromwell made the deal with Jews, taking their money and granting Jews special privileges that were not available to the vast majority of British Isles white Christians, so he could continue to wage war to exterminate as much of the heritage of Christendom as possible.

    WASP culture has always been pro-Jewish and violently opposed to the interests and desires of the vast majority of non-WASP whites.

    A thought provoking comment.
    Could you, please, expand on that?
    And/or maybe provide some pointers/links/online material?

    Read More
  97. peterAUS says:
    @Woop
    People better realize that its not really about the Nazis. Its about stifling dissent. They dont like the fact that you are not down with their agenda and not buying into what they are selling. You cant very well control the population when they dont like your agenda.

    You mark my words this is just he beginning. Stuff is being taken down that has nothing do with the Nazis. You just have to be accused of being racist, pro-white, whatever.... Than you are toast.

    Speaking as an IT guy there is lot more to this than just hosting web sites. Yes the hosting companies and domain registrars can shut you down by refusing your business. But what happens if you build your own data center - a very costly endeavor I might add and the network companies refuse to allow you access to the Internet backbone because you host stuff that they consider offensive.

    Only a handful of companies control the Internet's backbone in the USA - what if they decide to not allow you access? It would be very easy for them to refuse too let you tap into the backbone of the Internet. Than it wont matter what hosting company and registrar you have.

    But what happens if you build your own data center – a very costly endeavor I might add and the network companies refuse to allow you access to the Internet backbone because you host stuff that they consider offensive.

    That’s the crux.

    Actually, building a decent “data center” can be done even at home, really.
    With fibre access to the Internet it could work.

    But, the elephant in the living room is, as you pointed out, the very access to the Internet.
    From local ISP to the backbone.
    All it’s required is backbone providers rejecting/filtering out the content.

    Easy, technically, to implement and that’s THEIR next step I expect.
    Chinese example…..

    “Alternative” views will get pushed out of mainstream Internet (not totally out because there will always be workarounds).
    Those workarounds will filter out “pub/schoolyard” mentality all over the sphere.
    Good.

    Read More
  98. peterAUS says:
    @Sam Shama
    Every theoretical idea, including sociopolitical Rights, come with the understanding that in the practical arena there are limits to the theoretical. Thus when Saker writes the following:

    This is paradoxical, but the countries who are at the forefront of the resistance to the AngloZionist Empire have even less of a culture of freedom, especially on the Internet, than the USA or most EU countries.
     
    he has in fact, through this apparent paradox, arrived at that simple truth; every government, to a greater or lesser extent, realises that total laissez faire will result in anarchy. The key for successful states are the checks and balances written into their Constitutions. The USA has the best.

    Agree.

    Read More
  99. I think maybe the worst effect of the Holocaust following WWII is every side can claim, “Yeah, we did some bad things but not as bad as what the Nazis did.”

    That may well be true, but making oneself look better by contrasting one’s deeds with the Worst is a weasel trick.

    It’s like a murderer saying, “Sure, I killed those people, but it was nothing like what John Gacy did.”

    Therefore, your murders aren’t so bad because Gacy was much worse.

    So, no matter what horrible thing a government or nation, it can always say, “But we aren’t as bad as the Nazis.”

    Apologetics by comparing oneself with the Worst.

    Just as bad is the tendency to conflate anything one doesn’t like with ‘Nazis’ or ‘new Hitler’. So, if you wanna invade and destroy a nation, spread the word that Hussein or Gaddafi or Putin is the new hitler.

    If Hitler were around today as ruler of Germany, he might invade Poland by claiming that Polish rulers are the ‘new hitlers’.

    Read More
  100. first, let me say that free speech includes ugly speech, but should not be abridged.
    second, the nazis in germany started small. but they were a lot cleverer than today’s american nazis. look what they did. and they had a majority behind them.
    if the american nazis want power, they’d better change their name to something with the word freedom or liberty in it. the term ‘nazi’ is toxic.

    Read More
  101. Cyrano says:
    @fnn

    The snag is, if you go through the trouble of checking the demographics of the USSR you will not find any decrease of its population except during the WWII years!
     
    Yeah, the USSR never produced any fake statistics.

    Yeah, and there is always “explanation” for everything. If everything else fails – there is always the conspiracy theory.

    Read More
    • Replies: @fnn
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Census_(1937)
    "The Soviet Census held on January 6, 1937 was the most controversial of the censuses taken within the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The census results were not published because the census showed much lower population figures than anticipated, although it still showed a population growth from the last census in 1926, from 147 million to 162 million people in 1937."

    At least they did refrain from publishing them.
  102. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @War for Blair Mountain
    Wow...you are so clever!!!....not...

    Most Europeans did not enjoy the benefits of colonizing Hindu and Muslim Lands...and it would have been a very good idea if Christian Europe and Christian Russia became friends and annihilated the Ottoman Turks and wiped them off the Planet during the Crimea War Era....so as to put a permanent end to European Christian Women being sold off into Ottoman Slave Markets...


    But your fundamental point is irrelevant...The Historic Native Born White American Majority is under no obligation to tolerate a hostile and arrogant Hindu Fifth Column on American Soil and a hostile and arrogant Muslim Fifth Column....CAIR.. on American Soil voting them into a violently persecuted White racial minority on US Soil.


    The only moral obligation that the Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class has is to secure an existence for their Native Born White American Children as an overwhelming Racial Majority within the borders of America....whether Hindu-Jamaican POTUS Kamala Harris and her hostile Hindu Attorney General Preet Bharra like it or not.....The Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class will not consent to be governed by a hostile Jamaican-Hindu skank POTUS and her highly racialized Hindu Fifth Column Attorney General...

    What I have written above is my answer to Vincent Law's very interesting comments today over at Altright.com.....I fully expect Native Born White American Working Class Racial Tribalism to kick in post-Nov 3 2020....

    Dont worry she wont be POTUS. She blew her chances by making statements like ‘white supremacists’. And preet bhara was/is just doing is legal and constitutional job…even before she came onto the scene. And he is not as powerful or dangerous politically as you think he is. Whether you want to believe it is not….is your call. But thats the truth. He is just one among many attorney generals. He is a political lightweight who wont enter mainstream politics.

    Read More
  103. @Alden
    You need to lay off the meth. Your post reminds me of Jack Kerouac's style.

    Not just the meth but the mandingos as well … it’s a deadly combo!

    Read More
  104. Ramz on how the elites use antifa to silence certain enemies of globalism.

    Read More
  105. AndrewR says:
    @cricket
    I am pretty sure I get what The Saker is trying to say. However, I wish he would reconsider some of the context/tactics that weaken the overall argument he lays out.

    1. Pedophiles are the most disgusting form of human on Earth. By nature, being a pedophile requires an action, which is both illegal and immoral, and has nothing to do with 1st amendment/free speech rights. It is prosecutable under law as it should be.

    2. The hypocrisy between allowing child molester (chomo) websites and deleting Nazi-sympathizing websites is duly noted and correct; however, simply "hating" people is not an action, where being a chomo is. There is a fundamental difference and no slippery slope insofar as this particular analogy. For example, a declaration of "I hate Jews" is not the same as actually raping a child. One is an action, the other is talk.

    3. The 1st amendment is quite specific as what you can and can't do, as well as legal (and moral) precedent over obscenity, which chomo websites likely violate with regularity (I won't be visiting any). As long as direct, specific violence isn't advocated by daily stormer, they should be on solid legal grounds. Here, the corporations have circumvented their legal rights.

    4. the 1st amendment's primary, and only real functionary concern was to allow the citizenry to speak out against the government. You don't get to do the proverbial yelling of "Fire!" in a crowded theater when there isn't one. In other words, its largely a political context. Chomos are not political; they are just the most disgusting form of criminal. Nazis, as despicable as their position may be, are a dissident political view and as such have protected 1st amendment rights (as long as they are not actually engaging directly in violence).

    I hope The Saker were to consider some of this in order to form a more well founded argument, as I believe his overall thesis is correct and that he in no way is an advocate of chomos or Nazis. This is why it is important to have free discussion: to refine and flesh out political opinion.

    “By nature, being a pedophile requires an action”

    You don’t know what pedophile means. Being a pedophile means having an erotic attraction to prepubescent children. We’ll likely never know the real numbers but I imagine the vast majority of pedophiles never commit any illegal acts, just as most men attracted to grown women never commit rape, and most people who have had homicidal fantasies have never killed.

    Someone who engages in sexual acts is a pederast.

    Read More
  106. As usual The Saker post highly relevant articles with important points of view.
    It saddens me though the He continues the ATROCITY PROPAGANDA and GERMAN BASHING little changed from what he himself admits was a PROPAGANDA LIE ie the KZ Gas Chamber LIE
    The SAKER states ” that Nazi Einsatzgruppen murdered a huge number of civilians.” The SAKER appoints a JEW , Raul Hilberg, to be the foremost expert on Nazi atrocities, estimating that these units killed over 2 million people.” .. in some far away , difficult to locate ,isolated locations in the War zones of Russia and Ukraine ….. HOW CONVENIENT ! … 2 Million Jews is a tough task .. especially when one simultaneously has to fight the Heroic and Invincible BOLSHEVIK ARMY !.. This NEW ATROCITY SCENARIO has gained Traction synchronously with the WITHERING MYTHOS of NAZI GAS CHAMBER KILLINGS , which in any informed discussion has been sent to The ZIONIST GARBAGE HEAP of PROPAGANDA LIES….. The really smart thing about this new scenario of huge numbers of Killed people by the Evil Nazis is ..they are almost IMPOSSIBLE to verify or doccument .. a smart move … totally IGNORING the huge numbers of Guerillas especially JEWISH which were operating in Battle Zones., completely ignoring the REALITIES of WAR and totally ignoring STALINS Torch-Men Order “, No # 0428 confirmed by today’s Russian Government declaring That Russian partisans in German uniforms, particularly Those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements within a swathe of about 40 60 km depth from the main battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population., IMPLICATING the EVIL NAZIS in the necesary brutality carrying out this Military Scorched Earth Tactic … And here Mr Saker ..You are DISHONEST and BIASED .. because You so much need a COUNTER PICTURE to diminish the EVIL carried out by Your beloved fellow Countrymen .. and to uphold the MYTHOS of the GREAT FATHERLAND WAR against an EVIL GERMANY .. which Russia needs desperately to hold together your great country .. to day facing the same Relentless Attacks as did Hitlers Germany …. Mr SAKER… Nobody denies that a Lot of people DIED in the FRONTS between Germany and the SOVJET ….because IT WAS WAR … Millions died ..Yes ..but NOT as now RETROSPECTIVELY INVENTED .. as older Lies have fallen to the ground … I WANT PROOF … I WANT GRAVES , REMAINS , BODIES and SKELETONS !…. and i want at least 2 millions jews among them !..It really amazes me that this NEW ATROCITY SCENARIO was NOT USED by the BOLSHEVIKS …as they most certainly must have been aware of it ! Had it really Happened ..I am sure it would have been PUBLISHED in ALL MAJOR NEWS PAPERS of the WORLD …long Time ago ! Come on Saker .. RESPECT YOUR own Intelligence ! That said .. Your Article is very good and timely .. You have an uncanny ability to write about pressing matters ! …. But You do not have a solution … neither have I .. but I and You and all good people desperately need to address the issue brought forward by you .. and we better do it fast ….. I would prefer PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS and ACTION .. in stead of Endless Scriblings in Magazines and On Line ..and i really am surprised .. that there is not enough TALENT , CREATIVITY and WILLPOWER among all those who lament our SERFDOM .. to START working on Practical Solutions to overcome our PREDICAMENT .. ! … Iceland has very strict laws guaranteing FREE SPEECH and should therefore be a good STARTING PLACE .. the rest is TECHNICAL !

    Read More
    • Replies: @Heros
    Good comment Ole, despite too much usage of Caps.

    I think we all should commend Saker for coming out and stating, at much personal risk, that the figures we are forced to accept about the holocaust as bogus. Thank you Saker.

    This one fact makes it indisputable that all history around this "event" have to be re-examined in an open environment accepting of the truth. This is what we need and it will never happen because of people like Greenblatt at SPLC.

    The Allies and Stalin wrote the post war history, and as is evidenced by the fatally flawed Nuremburg trials, the Germans were never even allowed to present their case. All the history about the war needs to be rolled back, and if we could re-examine the real history I am confident the Germans would end up far with cleaner hands than the Soviets or any of the the Allies.

    Saker just doesn't get it about the dailystormer. It is like an alt-right mad magazine, and Anglin is a little like Alfred E. Neumann. Their post about the "death" (still no autopsy) of the crisis actor Heather Heyer was exactly the kind of think one would see in Mad. Its been going on in the Jewish mind control press for 50 years without complaint. (Check out https://www.youtube.com/user/SonofNewo)

    SPLC's vendetta against Anglin is personal. It goes way back to where they got Anglin fired years ago, as I recall. And there is a SPLC suit going on against dailystormer this very minute. This is the reason Anglin is so relentless in his pursuit of these Jewish "charities".

    So the SPLC, by using millions from Apple, Google, Facebook and Clooney, are waging a war against Anglin and dailystormer. They are trying to starve them of oxygen (money) for their defence in the lawsuit.

    I will mention that these are the same tactics Lerner used at the IRS to deprive the teaparty of contributions and swing the re-election of Obama in 2012.

  107. ‘They’ came for the ‘nazis’, but it seems like the Africans are coming for free gibs, free rides, and free access to white wombs.

    Read More
  108. JVC says:
    @Robert Magill

    I think that by now most paleoconservatives and libertarians have understood that “the Trump presidency is over” as Bannon put it. Trump is a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons.
     
    What if Trump doesn't know he's "a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons." ? What if he does know this and doesn't give a damn? What if only a crushed and neutered intellectual midget with guts can prevail in this chaos? If not Trump, who? If not Trump, when? Times running out, friends.


    http://robertmagill.wordpress.com

    Robert–The swamp has swallowed up Trump, and I suspect he knows it. The country is now being openly run by a military junta (which has been in charge all along-since WWII anyway). Trump knows that the only way he remains upright and breathing is to do what he is told to do. Unfortunately, the fact that elections (in this country and elsewhere) do not and can not change anything has been made perfectly clear this go round.

    Read More
  109. @anarchyst
    You are correct. Homosexuality and pedophilia are inextricably linked. It is ADULT homosexuals who prey on pre-pubescent and teen-age BOYS, recruiting them into the "lifestyle", before their (normal) heterosexual mores are set.
    The so-called Catholic priest "child abuse sex scandal" was actually homosexual pedophilic recruitment in action. Of course, the "mainstream media" could not afford to offend its readership by calling it by its true definition--homosexual pedophilia.
    It is a loosely-guarded secret that there was (is still?) a "lavender lobby" in the American seminary system. Good, straight, heterosexual candidates for the priesthood were purposely discouraged and de-selected from applying for the priesthood, so that the homosexual types could recruit and appoint "their own kind" to the priesthood. One has to wonder how "high-up" the "lavender lobby" goes...how many bishops and cardinals are part of this sordid group?
    That being said, there is actually MORE homosexual pedophilic behavior among ministers of other faiths, media types and politicians, school and public officials, than there ever was in the Catholic Church. Look at the "pass" pedophiles Jeff Epstein and Bill Clinton get despite their sordid behavior. There is a large pedophilia scandal involving many high-ranking public officials in the UK that is being covered up on "national security" grounds. Sorta tells you something...
    While I am glad this sordid behavior was exposed and is being remedied in the Catholic Church, it is clear that the "lugenpresse" has a visceral hatred of the Catholic Church, splashing Catholic transgressions all over the media while conveniently ignoring the greater numbers outside the Catholic hierarchy.

    The RCC is a homosexual, Freemasonic, multi-culti grand lodge. As long as you accept black/Asian priests-popes, you are part of the problem.

    Read More
  110. nickels says:
    @Priss Factor
    Yes, although the events in Germany were nothing new in the history of the west.

    While I think it's wrong and stupid to sacralize the Holocaust into a neo-religion and turn 6 million into a catechism, it's disingenuous to say there wasn't something especially sinister about it.

    True, there have been other mass killings and atrocities in the 20th century and all of human history.
    But a confluence of factors make the Holocaust seem especially sinister.

    It's true that US has committed massive horrors in Japan, Korea, Vietnam. Some of those bombings were near-genocidal. In the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US seemed to argue that it had to carry out micro-genocide to prevent macro-genocide(that would result from full invasion of Japan). Of course, one may ask why the US had to press for unconditional surrender.
    Still, the fact remains the US had no ideological design to wipe out an entire people. And even though Warmongers were ruthless and heartless and even though many Americans did harbor racial animus against another people, there was no explicit ideology that said 'Japs' are subhuman and must be wiped out to every man, woman, and child.

    But Nazism had such an ideology, and ideology does matter.

    Suppose I belong to a community and feel much anger about my community being attacked by another community, and suppose my people take revenge and attack the other community and kill 1000.

    In the other scenario, suppose I belong to a community that believes the other community is subhuman and should be wiped out, and we attack and manage to kill 1000.

    Are the two acts of violence of the same degree because both ended up with 1000 dead?

    No. The second is worse. In the first, my community would have been motivated by rage and anger, desire for revenge and raw justice. But in the second, my community wants to wipe out the other community simply because it is deemed subhuman.
    Also, once the rage is satiated and subsides in the first scenario, my community no longer feels hatred toward the other community. But in the second scenario, my community goes on wanting to wipe out the other community even if we feel no rage or even burning hatred. We feel this contempt for their mere existence.

    In the case of Japan, US was fueled by rage. But once the war ended and rage subsided, Americans wanted to make amends and build good ties with Japan. US carried out war crimes against Japan(who were nasty themselves), but once the peace was at hand, US no longer wanted to hurt or harm the Japanese.
    In contrast, suppose Nazis had won in Russia. Even with victory and peace, the Nazis would have aimed to kill 20 to 30 million Russians and reduce the rest to helot status.
    Consider how both Nazis and Soviets did horrible things to each other. And Soviet rape in Germany was horrible enough. But it was fueled by rage and revenge, not an ideology that said Germans were subhuman. So, when the rage subsided, Russians embraced East Germans as comrades. And this is why communism wasn't as evil as Nazism(even though it was worse than Fascism that rejected radical racism).

    Now, in terms of body count, some of the things done by US, UK, France(esp in Algeria), and etc are comparable to Nazi crimes. But 'comparable' doesn't mean 'equal'.
    It's like there's difference between first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and manslaughter.

    In the case of Japan vs US, the rage was understandable since Japan pulled off a dirty sneak attack.
    In the case of Korea and Vietnam, US crime was one of sheer indifference at the mass slaughter of civilians. As neither nation attacked the US, rage was hardly an issue. Besides, it was US intervention and division of those nations that led to war. Still, there was no ideology to wipe out everyone. This makes US war crimes comparable to Nazi crimes but still not of the same degree.

    There is violence as means and violence as as end. US sometimes used violence as means to achieve what it considered to be commendable goals: containing communism. Once the goal was met, there was no more need for violence.
    But it was different with the Nazis. Even with victory over Russia, they would not have been content with peace. They still would have carried out massive violence against Russians on grounds that they're subhuman. We tend to think of Holocaust as directed only at Jews and consider Russian dead as mere casualties of war. But there was a Nazi design to commit genocide on Russians as well. (This is where Jews miscalculated Nazi pathology. They though its violence would subside once Germans were satiated with revenge against Jews. Many Jews instinctively felt that their community had done bad things to Germans in the interwar yrs. After all, Jews spearheaded communist movements. Many Jews were involved in drugs and prostitution. There were Jews who exploited banking to make big profits while Germans were losing everything. So, when Nazis came to power, many German Jews braced for some hard times. They figured Germans would be understandably nasty for awhile until their rage eventually reached a crescendo and ebbed away. And that may have been the case if not for racial ideology of Nazism. It's like when Pearl Harbor happened, there were American riots against the Japanese-Americans who were dispossessed and herded into camps. But once the war came to a close and rage subsided, Americans lost their hatred. But Nazi Ideology and Hitler's rule meant that Germans would never be satiated until something more radical was done.)

    Anyway, even though it's valid to draw comparisons among various war crimes, ideas do matter. In the end, even if US did similar things that Japan and Germany did, it was still the Good Guy overall cuz it was driven by nobler ideas. This cannot be said today as the US has gone utterly cuckoo with Jewish-Homo Globalist supremacism, waging real wars and 'cold wars' to feed the insatiable appetite of the GLOB that attacks all national sovereignty as an affront to the New Empire with likes of Mark Zuckerberg as Caesar over us all.

    PS. In the 20th century, I would say three or four crimes are comparable to the Holocaust. One may be worse. One is the killing fields by Khmer Rouge, possibly the most insane mass killing ever as it was mostly Cams killing cams. (Khmer Rouge were not only extreme Maoists but ultra radical racists, wiping out non-Cams in Cambodia.) Another is Hutu massacre of Tutsis in Rwanda. But one could argue that Cambodians and Rwandans are not very civilized people, so whaddya expect. The third horror would be US bombing of North Korea that just turned into kill-as-many-people-as-possible. It was an act of utter disregard for civilians. Still, the murderousness was one of indifference than radical hate. And the fact that US was defending the South from the North shows US wasn't targeting all Koreans as a race. Some may include Stalin and Mao's famines, and they were horrible enough, but they were more the results of gross miscalculation and negligence than desire to wipe out millions.

    Anyway, the Nazi Holocaust(against Jews and Russians) seem worse because Germany was a civilized nation with a highly educated populace. As McCarthur said, Japan is like a boy of 14 but Germany, as a full-grown civilization, should have known better. But then, maybe ultra-civilizationism is the problem. After all, civilization grows by NOT tolerating what is deemed uncivilized and low. It is inherently discriminatory and eradicationist. First, it wipes out all dangerous animals. It only keeps those animals that can be pets or domesticated cattle. Second, it wipes out those unfit for Rule of Law... like red savages. Indeed, the reason why the civilized races are less aggressive and wild than Negroes is because of this weeding-out process. In bongo-wongo Africa, if a bunch of guys acted like thugs and chucked spears at rhinos, they were deemed badass and had most women and passed down most genes. But as civilization grew in Middle East, Asia, and Europe, men who acted like that were exiled, killed, or locked up. Thus, their genes got weeded out. (It's too bad slave owners in the South didn't weed out black genes in such manner. So, if a Negro looked and acted like Sonny Liston or Mike Tyson, weed his ass out. Favor the genes of Negroes who look and act like Gary Coleman and Emmanuel Lewis. But then, such gork-Negroes wouldn't have had the strength to carry bales of cotton.)

    Was it 'genocide' to expel American Indians? Or was it comparable to Russian takeover of Siberia and Chinese takeover of Tibet and Xianjiang? And Jewish takeover of Palestine? Anyway, civilization can only be built by suppressing or wiping out savagery or barbarism. If you let such modes of behavior loose, you have Detroit. So, in that sense, it makes sense that the ultra-civlizational agenda of Nazism was bound to be intolerant of anything deemed unworthy. It's like elite institutions keep out most rabble.

    But, Jews and Russians were not barbarians or savages. It seems the Jews were excessively civilized for the Germans. Excessive civilization, according to blood-and-soil Kulturist Germans, leads to cosmopolitanism, rootlessness, decadence, and degeneration. It becomes disassociated with organic blood-and-soil. It becomes obsessed with money than with matter. It disassociates sex from its functions and turns it into a commodity to be traded. As for Russians, they were civilized but apparently not civilized enough to the Germans. And it's true enough that many Russian peasants were hardly in the 20th century. When they invaded Germany, they drank out of toilet bowls and grabbed watches as the greatest treasure. Mario Puzo mentioned a Soviet soldier who thought water came out of the faucet itself. He had no concept of plumbing.

    https://books.google.com/books?id=Ze77qLEAaj4C&pg=PT18&lpg=PT18&dq=mario+puzo+faucet+soviet&source=bl&ots=eofc06ppnv&sig=JAWSydQZh6x2WXGWALgvnJ8uVqw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjxub6FmYLWAhXHrVQKHY5HAXsQ6AEIPDAH#v=onepage&q=mario%20puzo%20faucet%20soviet&f=false

    So, from the POV of Nazis, Jews were excessively civilized to the point of rootlessness and the Russians were not civilized or civilizable enough since they were too close to the soil and dung.

    If we take all of history as a whole, the saddest tragedy is maybe the takeover of South America and Mexico by Europeans. North America was sparsely populated by red savages, so the takeover was easy with limited bloodshed.
    But by some estimates, there were more than 60 million people in what is now called Latin America and diseases wiped out 55 million. Also, unlike red savages in the north, there were hindu-like civilizations in the South. And then, mass rape led to Diversity of mestizo, and then mass slave trade spread ghastly Negroes and mulattoes all over the continent. So, that was a total collapse of indigenous civilizations. Anyway, why is it esp sad? Because most peoples got their lands back. Asians got their lands back from imperialists. Africans and Muslims got their lands back from European imperialists. If anything, they are now colonizing Europe.
    But the indigenous folks of 'Latin America' will never get their lands back. It's lost to Empire of Diversity forever.

    Points taken, and I did end my comment with an addendum in that direction.
    Expelling was certainly nothing new.
    And, per Irving, it is not clear that the ideology was more than years of pent up anger and rhetoric. Irving argues that, in the end, the Furher only wanted exportation and that his weak control of the generals (coupled with his previous rhetoric) led to unsanctioned violence in the form of murderous thuggery.
    Seemingly Stalin’s extinction of the kulaks is in this realm.
    The fog of centuries of propaganda, NPR poetry pieces, movies, school indoctrination at every level–all makes it difficult to know where true parity lies.
    It will all culminate in the AntiChrist, in time.

    Read More
  111. Darin says:

    There are real Nazis, and real pedophiles, and there are real Nazi pedophiles. Fortunately they are few and are overwhelmingly rejected by both Nazi and pedophile communities.

    Like this guy, allegedly major “alt-right” thinker, who managed to disgust even hardcore Nazis.

    http://www.renegadetribune.com/jims-blog-bastion-pedophilia-normalization/

    Read More
  112. iffen says:
    @Shahna
    They will.
    And then they will get to you.

    Make no mistake, they aren't interested in some Nazis and pedophiles - are you nuts?
    They're interested in stifling dissent. Nazis and pedophiles is how they get you used to the idea of stifling and how they get the mechanisms in place to make it easy, simple, already a done thing; no debate required - just a little more each time.

    Now it's Nazis and pedophiles, in 6 months time it's The Saker and a year or two from now, it's you.
    It's only by protecting the right of the worst of us to speak today that we can guarantee our own right to speak tomorrow.

    It’s only by protecting the right of the worst of us to speak today that we can guarantee our own right to speak tomorrow.

    I understand the concept, I just can’t get into whining about there not being safe spaces for Nazis.

    I don’t believe it works unless there is a political consensus.

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.
     
    the irony is that it was the Stalinists who created the Nazis by wanting to kill them

    and so the Nazis said 'hey, those fuckers want to kill us, we should kill them first'

    and that was the origin of hate speech

    and today the alt-right are saying, 'hey, those fuckers want to knock down our heritage and demonize our ancestors and replace us with non-whites, let's tell them to fuck off'

    and so you have today's version of "Nazis' and Stalinists and 'hate speech'

    , @Mao Cheng Ji

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.
     
    Typically, speech doesn't kill, by itself.

    Rational argument against banning extremist speech is that suppressing extremist elements, making them feel like they have no stake in the political system, will only drive them underground and radicalize them more, leading, long-term, to much bigger problems.

    On the contrary, allowing extremist speech would allow the elites (competent elites, that is) to monitor, to analyze the dynamics of popular sentiment, and, hopefully, to alleviate by addressing the underlying social and economic issues.
  113. @War for Blair Mountain
    Wow...you are so clever!!!....not...

    Most Europeans did not enjoy the benefits of colonizing Hindu and Muslim Lands...and it would have been a very good idea if Christian Europe and Christian Russia became friends and annihilated the Ottoman Turks and wiped them off the Planet during the Crimea War Era....so as to put a permanent end to European Christian Women being sold off into Ottoman Slave Markets...


    But your fundamental point is irrelevant...The Historic Native Born White American Majority is under no obligation to tolerate a hostile and arrogant Hindu Fifth Column on American Soil and a hostile and arrogant Muslim Fifth Column....CAIR.. on American Soil voting them into a violently persecuted White racial minority on US Soil.


    The only moral obligation that the Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class has is to secure an existence for their Native Born White American Children as an overwhelming Racial Majority within the borders of America....whether Hindu-Jamaican POTUS Kamala Harris and her hostile Hindu Attorney General Preet Bharra like it or not.....The Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class will not consent to be governed by a hostile Jamaican-Hindu skank POTUS and her highly racialized Hindu Fifth Column Attorney General...

    What I have written above is my answer to Vincent Law's very interesting comments today over at Altright.com.....I fully expect Native Born White American Working Class Racial Tribalism to kick in post-Nov 3 2020....

    “…it would have been a very good idea if Christian Europe and Christian Russia became friends…”

    The Russian were just told to shut down the San Francisco consulate and two annexes in New York and Washington.

    Read More
  114. Rurik says: • Website
    @iffen
    It’s only by protecting the right of the worst of us to speak today that we can guarantee our own right to speak tomorrow.

    I understand the concept, I just can't get into whining about there not being safe spaces for Nazis.

    I don't believe it works unless there is a political consensus.

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.

    the irony is that it was the Stalinists who created the Nazis by wanting to kill them

    and so the Nazis said ‘hey, those fuckers want to kill us, we should kill them first’

    and that was the origin of hate speech

    and today the alt-right are saying, ‘hey, those fuckers want to knock down our heritage and demonize our ancestors and replace us with non-whites, let’s tell them to fuck off’

    and so you have today’s version of “Nazis’ and Stalinists and ‘hate speech’

    Read More
  115. @Anon
    If I missed a democracy in the Middle East other than those four, please let me know which country/ies it/they is/are.

    Egypt had elections, but Israel didn’t like who won, so the army took over. The Palestinians hold elections, but Israel doesn’t like who wins, so they don’t count. Iran holds democratic elections. But the Iranians are hiding nukes under BiBi’s bed, so we can’t count them.

    Turkey isn’t much of a democracy, if they held honest elections the Muslim Brotherhood would win in a landslide.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Seamus Padraig
    Erdogan's AKP is Turkey's chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood, and he did not win in a landslide.
    , @Wally
    Touche'. Anon bites the dust with his feeble hasbarist nonsense.

    In the meantime:
    Statue of Jew Confederate slave owner stands untouched in Florida

    https://revisionistreview.blogspot.it/2017/08/statue-of-judaic-confederate-slave.html

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2lnJKN7CQko/WZrpNr-v9JI/AAAAAAAAC1U/nxwUAqrnTmMj8rzsTnY4nURWtaR8GQhkACLcBGAs/s640/David%2BLevy%2BYulee.jpg

    David Levy Yulee statue in Florida

    https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LFUnAoF2_yM/WZrplON619I/AAAAAAAAC1Y/zHnw9Yl3CUsuo8gTORGzR-DM14FET9LHwCLcBGAs/s640/David_Levy_Yulee_-_Brady.jpg

    Yulee’s inflammatory pro-slavery rhetoric in the U.S. Senate earned him the nickname, “the Florida Fire Eater.” He resigned his senate seat to support the Confederacy.
  116. Kevin Alfred Strom is an American Neo-Nazi who was accused/convicted of being a kiddie diddler. Well convicted of kiddie porn.

    Read More
  117. Eagle Eye says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    So that leaves only two groups who are still capable of thought and these are the paleoconservatives and the libertarians.
     
    I don't think any of them (and especially not the libertarians) are going to help you. It's just like the ACLU: whatever private actors do, whomever they ban, it's all fine. If you want to publish a public-enemy-style website, and no hosting company wants you -- then get rich and open your own hosting company, your own email service, and your own search engine. End of story.

    This is capitalism, man. What do you suggest should happen?

    China might be the worst offender of them all: they now want to introduce the mandatory registration of passport data for each person using any social media!

    China is way behind the curve.

    Go to any public library in the U.S. and ask to use their computer. They will insist that you log on with your library card which itself is based on government ID. I.e., in the U.S. you are required to register “passport data” before you can go online. (BTW why do public libraries, supposedly run locally, all follow the same practice? Still think they don’t share your lending records?)

    But you are not at the library, you are using a private provider? The quasi-public AT&T? Your IP address is registered with various government agencies, known to Google (go to maps.google.com using a virgin browser), etc.

    Using VPN servers? Input and output are monitored through the ISP, even if the VPN operator itself doesn’t sell you out directly (which they probably do, having been told that theirs is a nice little business, and it would be a shame if anything were to happen to it).

    Using WiFi at a cafe? Your individual computer has an online fingerprint that can be ascertained cheaply and reliably from certain communications parameters which the NSA and others can readily link back to your real-world ID. All of this is happening reliably, automatically 24/7.

    OK – you’re ultra-paranoid and using TOR. Who finances TOR? Do you have access to all their records? Do you personally know each of their programmers (including those of bought-in software components)? Oh but they told you you can trust them? Have you personally screened every line of TOR’s source code? Do you know what happens upstream and downstream of the TOR system?

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    Your individual computer has an online fingerprint that can be ascertained cheaply and reliably from certain communications parameters which the NSA and others can readily link back to your real-world ID. All of this is happening reliably, automatically 24/7.
     
    Would you please explain "online fingerprint" and how it "can be ascertained cheaply and reliably", and if possible, what are those "certain communications parameters".
    Don't worry about IT lingo, hit me with any you want.

    Just to make my position clear, say, MAC address doesn't leave the first routing device.
    All bits in the frame/packet in OSI model are visible and well known.
    Don't think there is anything there that defines my personal machine.
    So...how can that be pointed back to, say, my laptop in public WiFi?

    Now, to also make something clear.
    I am talking about an average user using the Internet, not any previous exposure enticing THEIR interest.
    Because....if THEY are interested in your communication on the Internet, you have a much bigger problem than your communication being monitored.

    If they can't plant malware/spyware on your machine(s) they'll put you on REAL surveillance.
    And from there to questioning is a short walk.
    And from polite conversation to ...something else.........could also be a short walk.
    So, let's don't mix things here.

    My position is, with clean OS install and regular patching, a bit of "netstat-a" or Wireshark here and there and with Sysinternals tools like Process Monitor (yes, yes, all Windows world) on a public WiFi, one should be OK.

    Or I am missing something?
  118. This is getting nuts.

    Youboob is censoring everyone, even a Negress.

    I wonder if these Negresses will be next.

    Read More
  119. Neocons will come after US patriots because they are the last thing standing between them and total control of the United States.

    \True and it’s important to note that the Nazis were nearly the last things standing between the remnants of the “free” world and the world revolution-fomenting, bankster-backed Reds of the time.

    The Nazis weren’t the only ones to lose the big battle against gangster money lender world hegemony.

    Read More
  120. Avery says:
    @Alden
    And Poles are a lot blonder and bluer than the Germans and a bit taller too.

    Hitler was a loser who lost a war and gave half of Europe to the Soviet Union.

    {Hitler was a loser who lost a war and gave half of Europe to the Soviet Union.}

    The parts of Europe that were under Soviet rule – e.g. Poland, Hungary, etc – are the only European countries that today are actively resisting Globalist EU’s attempts to forcibly Islamize them.

    Probably because the 70 years of Soviet rule prevented their populations from being Sorosabrainwashed, lobotomized, and infected by various viruses of the Neocon/Globalist West.

    [Poland to Muslims: " Here, Jesus is our King, so get out "]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_BjPy19bYs

    Can you imagine such a march in any Western European country?
    Maybe Eastern Europeans will actually come out the winners in the long run.
    They will maintain their unique cultures and nationalities.
    They will remain Christians.

    Read More
  121. Saker: “… create the tools to oppress us all.”

    Thanks for that, Mr. Shaker and I respect your having alluded to “psyops.

    Over the past 3-months or so, I observed a very weird TV commercial which advertised a pharma drug product & I regret having forgotten the brand.

    At any rate, a rather attractive couple and a child is depicted luxuriating at a beach. While peaceful Bon Iver music plays, the child [perhaps 7-years old) is shown mounted upon the woman’s butt in a freaky position.

    In this case, a drug is available to help the human condition but for me, the TV commercial also introduced a scene which could arouse a sexually distorted person. (Sigh) “Psops” everywhere.

    Finally, allegiance to libertarian and paleoconservatism is a pretty good way to resist, and such does not arrive with a dozen or so “side effects.”

    But in the midst of mindless attacks on Russia for subverting our ZUSA nation’s election, I am longing for a mighty Russian Orthodox voice to appear and advertise Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s essay, “Repentance and The Self Limitation of Nations.” The Zionists have a “bag of tricks” for all forms of resistance. They need to get “psyop’d” by that which is confined beneath our rib cages.

    Thanks.

    Read More
  122. @Alden
    Interesting story about the destruction of the musicians career by an unsubstantiated claim in Facebook.

    Probably she came on to him, he turned her down so she posted her story and destroyed her career. People are evil.

    No one, man or woman, should be able to do such a thing.

    The reason? You provided it. People are evil. Don’t let them take freedom of expression away.

    Read More
  123. peterAUS says:
    @Eagle Eye

    China might be the worst offender of them all: they now want to introduce the mandatory registration of passport data for each person using any social media!
     
    China is way behind the curve.

    Go to any public library in the U.S. and ask to use their computer. They will insist that you log on with your library card which itself is based on government ID. I.e., in the U.S. you are required to register "passport data" before you can go online. (BTW why do public libraries, supposedly run locally, all follow the same practice? Still think they don't share your lending records?)

    But you are not at the library, you are using a private provider? The quasi-public AT&T? Your IP address is registered with various government agencies, known to Google (go to maps.google.com using a virgin browser), etc.

    Using VPN servers? Input and output are monitored through the ISP, even if the VPN operator itself doesn't sell you out directly (which they probably do, having been told that theirs is a nice little business, and it would be a shame if anything were to happen to it).

    Using WiFi at a cafe? Your individual computer has an online fingerprint that can be ascertained cheaply and reliably from certain communications parameters which the NSA and others can readily link back to your real-world ID. All of this is happening reliably, automatically 24/7.

    OK - you're ultra-paranoid and using TOR. Who finances TOR? Do you have access to all their records? Do you personally know each of their programmers (including those of bought-in software components)? Oh but they told you you can trust them? Have you personally screened every line of TOR's source code? Do you know what happens upstream and downstream of the TOR system?

    Your individual computer has an online fingerprint that can be ascertained cheaply and reliably from certain communications parameters which the NSA and others can readily link back to your real-world ID. All of this is happening reliably, automatically 24/7.

    Would you please explain “online fingerprint” and how it “can be ascertained cheaply and reliably”, and if possible, what are those “certain communications parameters”.
    Don’t worry about IT lingo, hit me with any you want.

    Just to make my position clear, say, MAC address doesn’t leave the first routing device.
    All bits in the frame/packet in OSI model are visible and well known.
    Don’t think there is anything there that defines my personal machine.
    So…how can that be pointed back to, say, my laptop in public WiFi?

    Now, to also make something clear.
    I am talking about an average user using the Internet, not any previous exposure enticing THEIR interest.
    Because….if THEY are interested in your communication on the Internet, you have a much bigger problem than your communication being monitored.

    If they can’t plant malware/spyware on your machine(s) they’ll put you on REAL surveillance.
    And from there to questioning is a short walk.
    And from polite conversation to …something else………could also be a short walk.
    So, let’s don’t mix things here.

    My position is, with clean OS install and regular patching, a bit of “netstat-a” or Wireshark here and there and with Sysinternals tools like Process Monitor (yes, yes, all Windows world) on a public WiFi, one should be OK.

    Or I am missing something?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Eagle Eye

    MAC address doesn’t leave the first routing device.
    All bits in the frame/packet in OSI model are visible and well known.
     
    I was talking about what happens in the real world between Joe Schmoe's computer and his ISP (and further upstream).

    You are talking about a theoretical "model" to describe communications for engineering purposes..


    Or I am missing something?
     
    Yes. Your car does not have a biological fingerprint. You do. But your car has numerous characteristics that differentiate it from other cars - color, smell, sound, trim, serial numbers of parts and assemblies, etc.

    Similarly, you have numerous characteristics that distinguish you from other individuals - a myriad of appearance parameters, blood type, smell, movement patterns, speech patterns, etc.

    The question to ask is: what characteristics of a computer or its user(s) can be readily captured on a world-wide scale, using off-the-shelf computer and router technology, and can then be built up over time to identify personal habits etc.?

    Quick experiment: look over your credit card statements for the last 3 months. List all "merchants" that you paid by total amount. How many people worldwide did business with ALL your top 10 during the same period?

  124. Anonymous says: • Disclaimer

    Ultimately, the White Race will survive, prosper and re-assert itself. It’s inevitable. The Jews have overplayed their hand, again, and there’s nothing they can do to save themselves, this time. They wanted a global solution and that’s where it will all end.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Indeed, the world would regress to a lower state without whites.

    fyi:
    Statue of Jew Confederate slave owner stands untouched in Florida

    https://revisionistreview.blogspot.it/2017/08/statue-of-judaic-confederate-slave.html

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2lnJKN7CQko/WZrpNr-v9JI/AAAAAAAAC1U/nxwUAqrnTmMj8rzsTnY4nURWtaR8GQhkACLcBGAs/s640/David%2BLevy%2BYulee.jpg

    David Levy Yulee statue in Florida

    https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LFUnAoF2_yM/WZrplON619I/AAAAAAAAC1Y/zHnw9Yl3CUsuo8gTORGzR-DM14FET9LHwCLcBGAs/s640/David_Levy_Yulee_-_Brady.jpg

    Yulee’s inflammatory pro-slavery rhetoric in the U.S. Senate earned him the nickname, “the Florida Fire Eater.” He resigned his senate seat to support the Confederacy.

  125. It just occurred to me that we here in many respects serve as one sector of the intelligentsia of the deep state.

    The deep State always co-opts/infiltrates any legitimate politicalish group, so that when the time comes they can make them look outlandish and foolish, keeping the mission centered.

    Steve Sailer is the head of the SS.

    Well played sir.

    Read More
  126. Parfois says:
    @Wally
    The facts are that the National Socialists were ..... well socialists.

    So 'the socialists came for the socialists'.

    Wally, as I have suspected, is an idiot. If a raven says he’s white, so he must be white. Funny logic…

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    IOW, you, like a lemming, voted for Hillary, or was it Bernie?
  127. @Mulegino1
    As Wally pointed out above, there are the National Socialists with the alleged 6 million and there are the National Socialists without them. That makes all of the difference in the world. Could it just be that the NSDAP were able to successfully tackle catastrophic unemployment, hopeless indebtedness, unbelievable societal and cultural corruption and restore both prosperity and dignity to a nation- all without resorting to usurious slavery? Could it be that the real sin of the "Nazis" was in resorting to the international barter trade and circumventing both the very "semitic" City of London and Wall Street? Could that- and not some outlandish and mad aggressive quest for "lebensraum" and destruction of the world's "untermenschen" be the real reason that they had to be demonized and destroyed? It sure looks that way, in retrospect. Nobody that I know now, in 2017, will refuse to admit that, in the light of current events, Europe lost the Second World War back in 1945.

    I am a big fan of the Saker, and I understand his visceral anti-Nazism, just as I understand the visceral anti-British sentiments of some of my Irish forebears. The "Great Patriotic War" is far more constitutive of the Russian identity than our own Hollywoodesque "Saving Private Ryan" nonsense is of our American one.

    It never seems to occur to all the Nazis experts that everything they think they know about Nazism (and repeat over and over like faithful little robots) was force-fed to them by a 100% Jewish-owned news media.

    Read More
  128. @Priss Factor
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/30/nationalise-google-facebook-amazon-data-monopoly-platform-public-interest

    I would argue the threat to free speech comes not so much from monopoly per se but ethno-monopoly. After all, Youtube got ADL, not BDS, to censor videos. So, rules of censorship has a ethno-bias.

    Also, much of the blame must go to academia and media that spread the culture of PC far and wide. Corporations are conforming to the kind of PC pushed by The Guardian and its ilk. Most elites focus on success and get their values from educators at elite colleges and think thanks. They are all PC.

    Nationalization is not a good idea. It will just lead to government censorship.

    What the state should do is regulate certain internet near-monopolies or oligopolies as utilities.
    Keep it private but make it serve the public good in fairness to all.

    After Charlottesville -- where a Jewish mayor pulled a dirty trick -- , Google didn't just deny platform to Daily Stormer but took down Andy Nowicki's Alternative Right that had always denounced Anglin as a loony and phony. Nowicki and Liddell were nowhere near Charlottesville.

    They got the blog going again at wordpress, but how long will that last?

    https://www.blogger.com/blogin.g?blogspotURL=https://alternative-right.blogspot.com/

    https://alternativeright.blog/

    Google didn’t just deny platform to Daily Stormer but took down Andy Nowicki’s Alternative Right that had always denounced Anglin as a loony and phony.

    After careful consideration, I am now fairly certain that Anglin is a loony and a phony, myself. The one good thing about the Stormer being down is that I will no longer be pestered by that idiotic White Sharia crap, which had to have been just about the stupidest meme ever invented.

    Read More
  129. @Mulegino1
    As Wally pointed out above, there are the National Socialists with the alleged 6 million and there are the National Socialists without them. That makes all of the difference in the world. Could it just be that the NSDAP were able to successfully tackle catastrophic unemployment, hopeless indebtedness, unbelievable societal and cultural corruption and restore both prosperity and dignity to a nation- all without resorting to usurious slavery? Could it be that the real sin of the "Nazis" was in resorting to the international barter trade and circumventing both the very "semitic" City of London and Wall Street? Could that- and not some outlandish and mad aggressive quest for "lebensraum" and destruction of the world's "untermenschen" be the real reason that they had to be demonized and destroyed? It sure looks that way, in retrospect. Nobody that I know now, in 2017, will refuse to admit that, in the light of current events, Europe lost the Second World War back in 1945.

    I am a big fan of the Saker, and I understand his visceral anti-Nazism, just as I understand the visceral anti-British sentiments of some of my Irish forebears. The "Great Patriotic War" is far more constitutive of the Russian identity than our own Hollywoodesque "Saving Private Ryan" nonsense is of our American one.

    The role of German barter agreements with Central Europe (German industrial goods swapped for raw materials) in engendering Anglo-American hostility, and the obvious threat this posed to their crisis-ridden parasitical financial system, is discussed by the brilliant libertarian Rothbard here (starting around p. 469 of the PDF):

    https://mises.org/library/history-money-and-banking-united-states-colonial-era-world-war-ii

    More generally, a German-Russian alliance makes too much historical sense, which is why the British have gone to such appalling lengths to prevent it.

    Read More
  130. Cyrano says:

    As a public service gesture, I’ll give you my theory about the main difference between the Nazis and the Communists. There are lot of geniuses (sarcasm) on this site that don’t know the difference between those 2.

    Here it goes: Communism is based on inferiority complex and Nazism (and democracy by the way) are based on the superiority complex. After all, the theory of Communism is to give chance to the inferiors to rule for the first time, while Nazi ideology was all about the superior ones having their way with the inferior.

    Nazis wanted to exterminate all the inferior ones – even within their own nation, but mainly they wanted to make the world a better place by eliminating all the inferior nations, which is far bigger undertaking than what communists attempted to do.

    Stalin looked to eliminate only those within his own country whom he feared are superior to him – which can mean pretty much everyone, since he wasn’t that great of an intellect. I bet that even if he ever attempted to read Das Capital (I highly doubt it), he probably couldn’t get past page 3. But even with Stalin’s paranoia, it was much easier for him to run out of suitable victims than it was for the Nazis.

    The main victims of the Nazis were foreign nations – except for the Jews, but as far as the Germans were concerned they were foreign too, so no real exception there. The main victims of the communists were the populations of their own countries. Call me naïve, but I believe it’s much easier to get rid of a domestic tyrant – all it takes is one gun in the right hands, at the right place.

    With the Nazis, one gun was extremely inadequate, you can’t stop whole armies with only one gun, and the assassination attempt on Hitler by his own kind in 1944 doesn’t count, because the assassins didn’t do it for the love of the inferior nations, but were afraid for the fate of their own one again, and one single foreign national had no chance in hell of getting close enough to Hitler to make the world a better place from his perspective.

    My point is that since the main target group of the communists were the homegrown intelligentsia, their ambitions by definition were much smaller compared to the Nazis. Given enough time, the Nazis would have eliminated 90% of the world population, because the definition of inferiority can really be expanded to include 9/10 of the world, at least when calculated by the Nazis, who were extremely generous with their admission guidelines into the inferiors club.

    What I am trying to say is that the target group of the communists – the intelligentsia was much smaller – let’s say 10% of the population of their own country can fit into this category of people that they were after, while the Nazis could really let their imagination go wild when trying to figure out how many nations could qualify as inferior by their standards.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Are you going for irony here?
    , @Avery
    Very good juxtaposition.

    Bolsheviks/Communists surely killed and murdered large numbers of people, but it was not based on one's ethnicity. With some exceptions, anyone could choose to become Bolshevik/Communist.
    Pretty much all nationalities of the Tsarist Russian Empire (later Soviet Union) were represented in Bolshevik/Communist leadership and ranks.
    (There was an over-representation of Jews in Bolshevik leadership, but that's a different subject.)

    Nazi ideology sought to exterminate all Untermenscen - everywhere and anywhere their Einsatzgruppen could reach in force,
    If you were an Untermensch, you couldn't become an (supposed) Aryan/MasterRace even if you tried. You were dead meat.
  131. This is a very courageous article. And a very wise one. Of course, “liberal” corporations like Google and YouTube (owned by Google) and GoDaddy come for the Nazis and the pedophiles first. But things are evolving so fast that Google is even actually already directing searches on civil rights questions away from the ACLU! These are dark times indeed! As for Saker’s remarks about “The” Holocaust, a few quick observations. (1) While scholarly Jewish sources typically state that “6 million Jews” died in the Holocaust (meaning primarily concentration camps), most of these same sources go on to state, if only as a footnote, that “5 million goyem” (i.e. non-Jews) also died in the Holocaust. “Non-Jews” include Slavs, gypsies, Russian POWs, homosexuals, mental defectives, etc. Thus the total number of deaths in the Holocaust, even according to scholarly Jewish sources, should be 11 million–if “goyem” are counted as “human.” However, I understand that Talmudic scholars differ as to whether we should be considered “human” or not. Perhapa the Nazis just turned the question around. (2) It is also important to note that Hitler hated Slavs every bit as much as Jews and that his Plan Ost (Plan East) called for the extermination of Slavs throughout the whole of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, using the many genocidal techniques perfected by White America in its extermination of 114 million Native Americans over 111 years–from Gen. George Washington’s incineration of 25 large Indian towns with its inhabitants burned alive inside in 1779 during the Revolutionary War to the slaughter of sleeping Indian men, women, children, infants, and old folks fleeing to Canada on a cold December dawn at Wounded Knee in 1890. Hitler, who had grown reading American cowboy and Indian comics, watching silent C & I movies, and playing C & I with his friends, considered white America to have set “the gold standard in genocide” and demanded that his generals study American genocide methods closely. While Hitler did succeed in killing 10 million Russian civilians, this is nothing compared with 114 million Native Americans white America killed. (3) Auschwitz–which was financed and built by Prescott Bush, the father of George H.W. Bush and the grandfather of George W. Bush (acc0rding to official US Treasury Dept. documents, which seized one of Prescott’s banks in 1943, but stopped there)–killed 1.5 millions Jews and goyem during its 3 years of operation. That’s the same number of Russian Slavs who died of starvation in 3 years time at Leningrad: which Hitler saw as a model Slavic “reservation.” (5) Finally, for reasons I don’t understand, Jewish historians tend to ignore earlier Holocausts in their history, such as the Roman Holocaust of 70 AD, in which Titus “kettled” all the Jews from towns and cities all over Palestine into Jerusalem: stopped all food and water coming into the city; knocked down the aqueducts; crucified anyone who sought to surrender before the walls of Jerusalem; continued the siege for 3 months till nearly everyone was dead; then scaled the walls; killed the sick and dying; set fire to the city; and leveled every building to the point that “not one stone stood upon another”–including those of the
    Second Temple, while killing 1.5 million Jews in all. Yet Jewish scholars generally only refer to “the Destruction of the Temple”–as if the loss of human life were of no account. I have no idea why.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    Can you please provide a source for your claim that the Germans planned to kill Slavs en mass in the occupied SU, in particular using methods employed by the Americans against the Indians?
  132. Miro23 says:

    Trump is a crushed and neutered intellectual midget in the hands of the Neocons. But what Trump stood for during his election still deserves to be fought for. Forget the man, but remember the values, the ideas, the principles which got him elected.

    The deep Neocon/corporate state finds it much easier to go after a single person – in this case Trump, with a daily barrage of attacks until he is crushed, but it has to be more difficult to go after his base.

    There are interesting parallels with the Soviet Union.

    After their coup, the Bolsheviks resolved the problem of “Rightists” by creating powerful local Soviets across Russia to enforce their power at a local level, made up of sympathizers /opportunists and excluding everything to do with traditional Russia.

    In the US, the Neocon/corporate/deep state doesn’t yet have absolute power, but it’s close, and if they do get it (through some kind of National Emergency), they would need to follow the same route with Neocon/corporate/SJW “Soviets” holding absolute power in all red states and counties to compel obedience to the Neocon/corporate/SJW agenda.

    The points seems to be that it worked in Russia because the Bolsheviks were ready to use extreme violence against any opposition.

    In the US, the Neocons wouldn’t hesitate, but I have doubts about their corporate and SJW allies. Also the fake “liberation” wave that the Bolsheviks were riding had the partially credible narrative of “socialist worker freedom” whereas the ZioGlob can mostly only offer the sad package of Weimar style degeneracy that doesn’t really appeal to anyone.

    The ZioGlobs certainly aren’t trying to liberate the Deplorables and improve their lot, in fact they are more like France’s Ancien Régime trying to protect their wealth and private aristocratic system against revolutionaries.

    Read More
  133. Bardamu says:

    I don’t see anyone going for the pedos but I do see Jews (if you can mention NAZIS you can mention Jews, right?) going for the NAZIS, i.e. the people Jews hate.

    Read More
  134. Wally says:

    Sorry to confuse you with facts.

    Parfois, as is obvious, is a slimy Zionist hasbarist.

    Read More
  135. Wally says:
    @Anonymous
    Ultimately, the White Race will survive, prosper and re-assert itself. It's inevitable. The Jews have overplayed their hand, again, and there's nothing they can do to save themselves, this time. They wanted a global solution and that's where it will all end.

    Indeed, the world would regress to a lower state without whites.

    fyi:
    Statue of Jew Confederate slave owner stands untouched in Florida

    https://revisionistreview.blogspot.it/2017/08/statue-of-judaic-confederate-slave.html


    David Levy Yulee statue in Florida

    Yulee’s inflammatory pro-slavery rhetoric in the U.S. Senate earned him the nickname, “the Florida Fire Eater.” He resigned his senate seat to support the Confederacy.

    Read More
  136. Heros says:
    @Ole C G Olesen
    As usual The Saker post highly relevant articles with important points of view.
    It saddens me though the He continues the ATROCITY PROPAGANDA and GERMAN BASHING little changed from what he himself admits was a PROPAGANDA LIE ie the KZ Gas Chamber LIE
    The SAKER states " that Nazi Einsatzgruppen murdered a huge number of civilians." The SAKER appoints a JEW , Raul Hilberg, to be the foremost expert on Nazi atrocities, estimating that these units killed over 2 million people." .. in some far away , difficult to locate ,isolated locations in the War zones of Russia and Ukraine ..... HOW CONVENIENT ! ... 2 Million Jews is a tough task .. especially when one simultaneously has to fight the Heroic and Invincible BOLSHEVIK ARMY !.. This NEW ATROCITY SCENARIO has gained Traction synchronously with the WITHERING MYTHOS of NAZI GAS CHAMBER KILLINGS , which in any informed discussion has been sent to The ZIONIST GARBAGE HEAP of PROPAGANDA LIES..... The really smart thing about this new scenario of huge numbers of Killed people by the Evil Nazis is ..they are almost IMPOSSIBLE to verify or doccument .. a smart move ... totally IGNORING the huge numbers of Guerillas especially JEWISH which were operating in Battle Zones., completely ignoring the REALITIES of WAR and totally ignoring STALINS Torch-Men Order ", No # 0428 confirmed by today's Russian Government declaring That Russian partisans in German uniforms, particularly Those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements within a swathe of about 40 60 km depth from the main battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population., IMPLICATING the EVIL NAZIS in the necesary brutality carrying out this Military Scorched Earth Tactic ... And here Mr Saker ..You are DISHONEST and BIASED .. because You so much need a COUNTER PICTURE to diminish the EVIL carried out by Your beloved fellow Countrymen .. and to uphold the MYTHOS of the GREAT FATHERLAND WAR against an EVIL GERMANY .. which Russia needs desperately to hold together your great country .. to day facing the same Relentless Attacks as did Hitlers Germany .... Mr SAKER... Nobody denies that a Lot of people DIED in the FRONTS between Germany and the SOVJET ....because IT WAS WAR ... Millions died ..Yes ..but NOT as now RETROSPECTIVELY INVENTED .. as older Lies have fallen to the ground ... I WANT PROOF ... I WANT GRAVES , REMAINS , BODIES and SKELETONS !.... and i want at least 2 millions jews among them !..It really amazes me that this NEW ATROCITY SCENARIO was NOT USED by the BOLSHEVIKS ...as they most certainly must have been aware of it ! Had it really Happened ..I am sure it would have been PUBLISHED in ALL MAJOR NEWS PAPERS of the WORLD ...long Time ago ! Come on Saker .. RESPECT YOUR own Intelligence ! That said .. Your Article is very good and timely .. You have an uncanny ability to write about pressing matters ! .... But You do not have a solution ... neither have I .. but I and You and all good people desperately need to address the issue brought forward by you .. and we better do it fast ..... I would prefer PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS and ACTION .. in stead of Endless Scriblings in Magazines and On Line ..and i really am surprised .. that there is not enough TALENT , CREATIVITY and WILLPOWER among all those who lament our SERFDOM .. to START working on Practical Solutions to overcome our PREDICAMENT .. ! ... Iceland has very strict laws guaranteing FREE SPEECH and should therefore be a good STARTING PLACE .. the rest is TECHNICAL !

    Good comment Ole, despite too much usage of Caps.

    I think we all should commend Saker for coming out and stating, at much personal risk, that the figures we are forced to accept about the holocaust as bogus. Thank you Saker.

    This one fact makes it indisputable that all history around this “event” have to be re-examined in an open environment accepting of the truth. This is what we need and it will never happen because of people like Greenblatt at SPLC.

    The Allies and Stalin wrote the post war history, and as is evidenced by the fatally flawed Nuremburg trials, the Germans were never even allowed to present their case. All the history about the war needs to be rolled back, and if we could re-examine the real history I am confident the Germans would end up far with cleaner hands than the Soviets or any of the the Allies.

    Saker just doesn’t get it about the dailystormer. It is like an alt-right mad magazine, and Anglin is a little like Alfred E. Neumann. Their post about the “death” (still no autopsy) of the crisis actor Heather Heyer was exactly the kind of think one would see in Mad. Its been going on in the Jewish mind control press for 50 years without complaint. (Check out https://www.youtube.com/user/SonofNewo)

    SPLC’s vendetta against Anglin is personal. It goes way back to where they got Anglin fired years ago, as I recall. And there is a SPLC suit going on against dailystormer this very minute. This is the reason Anglin is so relentless in his pursuit of these Jewish “charities”.

    So the SPLC, by using millions from Apple, Google, Facebook and Clooney, are waging a war against Anglin and dailystormer. They are trying to starve them of oxygen (money) for their defence in the lawsuit.

    I will mention that these are the same tactics Lerner used at the IRS to deprive the teaparty of contributions and swing the re-election of Obama in 2012.

    Read More
  137. @iffen
    It’s only by protecting the right of the worst of us to speak today that we can guarantee our own right to speak tomorrow.

    I understand the concept, I just can't get into whining about there not being safe spaces for Nazis.

    I don't believe it works unless there is a political consensus.

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.

    Typically, speech doesn’t kill, by itself.

    Rational argument against banning extremist speech is that suppressing extremist elements, making them feel like they have no stake in the political system, will only drive them underground and radicalize them more, leading, long-term, to much bigger problems.

    On the contrary, allowing extremist speech would allow the elites (competent elites, that is) to monitor, to analyze the dynamics of popular sentiment, and, hopefully, to alleviate by addressing the underlying social and economic issues.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Rational argument against banning extremist speech is that suppressing extremist elements, making them feel like they have no stake in the political system, will only drive them underground and radicalize them more, leading, long-term, to much bigger problems.

    This is a very sound argument. It has been making the rounds in the MSM for the last few weeks.

    would allow the elites (competent elites, that is) to monitor, to analyze the dynamics of popular sentiment, and, hopefully, to alleviate by addressing the underlying social and economic issues

    You are hoping against hope here as competent (and caring) elites are missing. If those sorts of elites were present we wouldn’t be in the situation that we are in now, much less be in need of a way out.

    I am conflicted on the free speech issue. I do love the ideal, especially muh Murican version. I guess I will have to put it in the same category with all the other virtues. Free speech until Armageddon, then fight to win.

  138. @Cyrano
    As a public service gesture, I’ll give you my theory about the main difference between the Nazis and the Communists. There are lot of geniuses (sarcasm) on this site that don’t know the difference between those 2.

    Here it goes: Communism is based on inferiority complex and Nazism (and democracy by the way) are based on the superiority complex. After all, the theory of Communism is to give chance to the inferiors to rule for the first time, while Nazi ideology was all about the superior ones having their way with the inferior.

    Nazis wanted to exterminate all the inferior ones – even within their own nation, but mainly they wanted to make the world a better place by eliminating all the inferior nations, which is far bigger undertaking than what communists attempted to do.

    Stalin looked to eliminate only those within his own country whom he feared are superior to him – which can mean pretty much everyone, since he wasn’t that great of an intellect. I bet that even if he ever attempted to read Das Capital (I highly doubt it), he probably couldn’t get past page 3. But even with Stalin’s paranoia, it was much easier for him to run out of suitable victims than it was for the Nazis.

    The main victims of the Nazis were foreign nations – except for the Jews, but as far as the Germans were concerned they were foreign too, so no real exception there. The main victims of the communists were the populations of their own countries. Call me naïve, but I believe it’s much easier to get rid of a domestic tyrant – all it takes is one gun in the right hands, at the right place.

    With the Nazis, one gun was extremely inadequate, you can’t stop whole armies with only one gun, and the assassination attempt on Hitler by his own kind in 1944 doesn’t count, because the assassins didn’t do it for the love of the inferior nations, but were afraid for the fate of their own one again, and one single foreign national had no chance in hell of getting close enough to Hitler to make the world a better place from his perspective.

    My point is that since the main target group of the communists were the homegrown intelligentsia, their ambitions by definition were much smaller compared to the Nazis. Given enough time, the Nazis would have eliminated 90% of the world population, because the definition of inferiority can really be expanded to include 9/10 of the world, at least when calculated by the Nazis, who were extremely generous with their admission guidelines into the inferiors club.

    What I am trying to say is that the target group of the communists – the intelligentsia was much smaller – let’s say 10% of the population of their own country can fit into this category of people that they were after, while the Nazis could really let their imagination go wild when trying to figure out how many nations could qualify as inferior by their standards.

    Are you going for irony here?

    Read More
  139. @Dr. Charles
    This is a very courageous article. And a very wise one. Of course, "liberal" corporations like Google and YouTube (owned by Google) and GoDaddy come for the Nazis and the pedophiles first. But things are evolving so fast that Google is even actually already directing searches on civil rights questions away from the ACLU! These are dark times indeed! As for Saker's remarks about "The" Holocaust, a few quick observations. (1) While scholarly Jewish sources typically state that "6 million Jews" died in the Holocaust (meaning primarily concentration camps), most of these same sources go on to state, if only as a footnote, that "5 million goyem" (i.e. non-Jews) also died in the Holocaust. "Non-Jews" include Slavs, gypsies, Russian POWs, homosexuals, mental defectives, etc. Thus the total number of deaths in the Holocaust, even according to scholarly Jewish sources, should be 11 million--if "goyem" are counted as "human." However, I understand that Talmudic scholars differ as to whether we should be considered "human" or not. Perhapa the Nazis just turned the question around. (2) It is also important to note that Hitler hated Slavs every bit as much as Jews and that his Plan Ost (Plan East) called for the extermination of Slavs throughout the whole of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, using the many genocidal techniques perfected by White America in its extermination of 114 million Native Americans over 111 years--from Gen. George Washington's incineration of 25 large Indian towns with its inhabitants burned alive inside in 1779 during the Revolutionary War to the slaughter of sleeping Indian men, women, children, infants, and old folks fleeing to Canada on a cold December dawn at Wounded Knee in 1890. Hitler, who had grown reading American cowboy and Indian comics, watching silent C & I movies, and playing C & I with his friends, considered white America to have set "the gold standard in genocide" and demanded that his generals study American genocide methods closely. While Hitler did succeed in killing 10 million Russian civilians, this is nothing compared with 114 million Native Americans white America killed. (3) Auschwitz--which was financed and built by Prescott Bush, the father of George H.W. Bush and the grandfather of George W. Bush (acc0rding to official US Treasury Dept. documents, which seized one of Prescott's banks in 1943, but stopped there)--killed 1.5 millions Jews and goyem during its 3 years of operation. That's the same number of Russian Slavs who died of starvation in 3 years time at Leningrad: which Hitler saw as a model Slavic "reservation." (5) Finally, for reasons I don't understand, Jewish historians tend to ignore earlier Holocausts in their history, such as the Roman Holocaust of 70 AD, in which Titus "kettled" all the Jews from towns and cities all over Palestine into Jerusalem: stopped all food and water coming into the city; knocked down the aqueducts; crucified anyone who sought to surrender before the walls of Jerusalem; continued the siege for 3 months till nearly everyone was dead; then scaled the walls; killed the sick and dying; set fire to the city; and leveled every building to the point that "not one stone stood upon another"--including those of the
    Second Temple, while killing 1.5 million Jews in all. Yet Jewish scholars generally only refer to "the Destruction of the Temple"--as if the loss of human life were of no account. I have no idea why.

    Can you please provide a source for your claim that the Germans planned to kill Slavs en mass in the occupied SU, in particular using methods employed by the Americans against the Indians?

    Read More
    • Replies: @simplyamazed
    Start with Mein Kampf for both. Also the concept of Lebensraum for the Nazis requird the extermination of what they felt were inferior, savage races on land that should belong to the ubermensch. Hitler apparantly admired the U.S. approach to the Indians as a model for the final solution and Lebensraum.
    , @Seamus Padraig
    I don't know if the methods to be used would have been exactly like those used against the Indians, but Hitler's plan for western Russia was brutal. It was know as Generalplan Ost.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost
    , @Dr. Charles
    Mein Kampf is the primary source. Followed by a number of recent books, such as "Hitler's American Model." Indian scholars have also done a lot of work on this. But Google is now disabling those sites. Your best route is to find a scholarly Indian/Native American site. And then do your search from there. Sorry I can't be of more help. But I have my hands full battling cancer.
    , @simplyamazed
    Further to my previous reply:

    Writing in, Mein Kampf (My Struggle), in 1924, Hitler declared,

    "We National Socialists consciously draw a line through the foreign policy trend of our pre-War period. We take up at the halting place of six hundred years ago. We terminate the endless German drive to the south and west of Europe, and turn our gaze toward the lands in the east. We finally terminate the colonial and trade policy of the pre-War period and proceed to the territorial policy of the future … if we talk about new soil and territory in Europe today, we can think primarily only of Russia and its vassal border states."

    Minutes of Hitler Conference, 17 October 1941
    "There is only one task: Germanization through the introduction of Germans [to the area] and to treat the original inhabitants like Indians. … I intend to stay this course with ice-cold determination. I feel myself to be the executor of the will of History. What people think of me at present is all of no consequence. Never have I heard a German who has bread to eat express concern that the ground where the grain was grown had to be conquered by the sword. We eat Canadian wheat and never think of the Indians."

    And speaking of the Ukraine, Himmler stated:
    “Without end, the steppes of the Russian area extend [to] eastern Europe. Abrupt and sudden is the difference between the cultural levels of central Europe and the gigantic districts [to the east]. And yet, on both sides of the frontier there is the same soil, but not the same people. Only man alone is able to impress his stamp upon the country. Therefore, on the one side the well ordered fertility, planned harmony of fields and carefully designed villages of Germany, and on the other side the zones of an impenetrable jungle, of the steppes, of never ending primeval forests, where silting rivers painfully cut their ways.

    Badly exploited, fertile soil of black earth that could be a paradise, a California of Europe, and in reality abandoned, dreadfully neglected, branded with the stamp of a crime against culture beyond imagination even today, is a perpetual accusation against the sub-human and his rule."
  140. iffen says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    It is irrational to allow Nazis and Stalinists to use free speech in order to kill you.
     
    Typically, speech doesn't kill, by itself.

    Rational argument against banning extremist speech is that suppressing extremist elements, making them feel like they have no stake in the political system, will only drive them underground and radicalize them more, leading, long-term, to much bigger problems.

    On the contrary, allowing extremist speech would allow the elites (competent elites, that is) to monitor, to analyze the dynamics of popular sentiment, and, hopefully, to alleviate by addressing the underlying social and economic issues.

    Rational argument against banning extremist speech is that suppressing extremist elements, making them feel like they have no stake in the political system, will only drive them underground and radicalize them more, leading, long-term, to much bigger problems.

    This is a very sound argument. It has been making the rounds in the MSM for the last few weeks.

    would allow the elites (competent elites, that is) to monitor, to analyze the dynamics of popular sentiment, and, hopefully, to alleviate by addressing the underlying social and economic issues

    You are hoping against hope here as competent (and caring) elites are missing. If those sorts of elites were present we wouldn’t be in the situation that we are in now, much less be in need of a way out.

    I am conflicted on the free speech issue. I do love the ideal, especially muh Murican version. I guess I will have to put it in the same category with all the other virtues. Free speech until Armageddon, then fight to win.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    You are hoping against hope here as competent (and caring) elites are missing.
     
    Agreed, depending on your definition of "caring". What's missing is a competent elite invested in the national economy and national stability. What we have instead is the globalist elite, invested mainly in hedge funds, international finance, and such.

    I do love the ideal, especially muh Murican version.
     
    I don't like the 'ideal', dogmatic version at all; not as the concept of a 'right', as it's usually presented and trumpeted. There's no 'human right' to do anything. It's always a balance between individual and public interests, and the balance point fluctuates depending on the circumstances.
  141. @iffen
    Rational argument against banning extremist speech is that suppressing extremist elements, making them feel like they have no stake in the political system, will only drive them underground and radicalize them more, leading, long-term, to much bigger problems.

    This is a very sound argument. It has been making the rounds in the MSM for the last few weeks.

    would allow the elites (competent elites, that is) to monitor, to analyze the dynamics of popular sentiment, and, hopefully, to alleviate by addressing the underlying social and economic issues

    You are hoping against hope here as competent (and caring) elites are missing. If those sorts of elites were present we wouldn’t be in the situation that we are in now, much less be in need of a way out.

    I am conflicted on the free speech issue. I do love the ideal, especially muh Murican version. I guess I will have to put it in the same category with all the other virtues. Free speech until Armageddon, then fight to win.

    You are hoping against hope here as competent (and caring) elites are missing.

    Agreed, depending on your definition of “caring”. What’s missing is a competent elite invested in the national economy and national stability. What we have instead is the globalist elite, invested mainly in hedge funds, international finance, and such.

    I do love the ideal, especially muh Murican version.

    I don’t like the ‘ideal’, dogmatic version at all; not as the concept of a ‘right’, as it’s usually presented and trumpeted. There’s no ‘human right’ to do anything. It’s always a balance between individual and public interests, and the balance point fluctuates depending on the circumstances.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    depending on your definition of “caring”.

    Agree

    What’s missing is a competent elite invested in the national economy and national stability.

    Agree, except there is a lot contained within “national economy” and “stability.”

    I don’t like the ‘ideal’, dogmatic version at all; not as the concept of a ‘right’,

    Disagree

    Create it, will it into existence, exercise it, declare it to be an essential and inviolable part of human dignity.

    Build it and they will come.
  142. iffen says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    You are hoping against hope here as competent (and caring) elites are missing.
     
    Agreed, depending on your definition of "caring". What's missing is a competent elite invested in the national economy and national stability. What we have instead is the globalist elite, invested mainly in hedge funds, international finance, and such.

    I do love the ideal, especially muh Murican version.
     
    I don't like the 'ideal', dogmatic version at all; not as the concept of a 'right', as it's usually presented and trumpeted. There's no 'human right' to do anything. It's always a balance between individual and public interests, and the balance point fluctuates depending on the circumstances.

    depending on your definition of “caring”.

    Agree

    What’s missing is a competent elite invested in the national economy and national stability.

    Agree, except there is a lot contained within “national economy” and “stability.”

    I don’t like the ‘ideal’, dogmatic version at all; not as the concept of a ‘right’,

    Disagree

    Create it, will it into existence, exercise it, declare it to be an essential and inviolable part of human dignity.

    Build it and they will come.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    Create it, will it into existence, exercise it, declare it to be an essential and inviolable part of human dignity.
     
    Any dogma is problematic. I mean, it might work well as a propaganda tool, but eventually parts of the elite get brainwashed by their own bullshit and that's a problem.

    Also, who made the vague and utterly subjective concept of 'human dignity' such a supreme value?
  143. @iffen
    depending on your definition of “caring”.

    Agree

    What’s missing is a competent elite invested in the national economy and national stability.

    Agree, except there is a lot contained within “national economy” and “stability.”

    I don’t like the ‘ideal’, dogmatic version at all; not as the concept of a ‘right’,

    Disagree

    Create it, will it into existence, exercise it, declare it to be an essential and inviolable part of human dignity.

    Build it and they will come.

    Create it, will it into existence, exercise it, declare it to be an essential and inviolable part of human dignity.

    Any dogma is problematic. I mean, it might work well as a propaganda tool, but eventually parts of the elite get brainwashed by their own bullshit and that’s a problem.

    Also, who made the vague and utterly subjective concept of ‘human dignity’ such a supreme value?

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Also, who made the vague and utterly subjective concept of ‘human dignity’ such a supreme value?

    I do and many others do as well. It is choosing what to value. You don't value the concept of human dignity?

  144. Avery says:
    @Cyrano
    As a public service gesture, I’ll give you my theory about the main difference between the Nazis and the Communists. There are lot of geniuses (sarcasm) on this site that don’t know the difference between those 2.

    Here it goes: Communism is based on inferiority complex and Nazism (and democracy by the way) are based on the superiority complex. After all, the theory of Communism is to give chance to the inferiors to rule for the first time, while Nazi ideology was all about the superior ones having their way with the inferior.

    Nazis wanted to exterminate all the inferior ones – even within their own nation, but mainly they wanted to make the world a better place by eliminating all the inferior nations, which is far bigger undertaking than what communists attempted to do.

    Stalin looked to eliminate only those within his own country whom he feared are superior to him – which can mean pretty much everyone, since he wasn’t that great of an intellect. I bet that even if he ever attempted to read Das Capital (I highly doubt it), he probably couldn’t get past page 3. But even with Stalin’s paranoia, it was much easier for him to run out of suitable victims than it was for the Nazis.

    The main victims of the Nazis were foreign nations – except for the Jews, but as far as the Germans were concerned they were foreign too, so no real exception there. The main victims of the communists were the populations of their own countries. Call me naïve, but I believe it’s much easier to get rid of a domestic tyrant – all it takes is one gun in the right hands, at the right place.

    With the Nazis, one gun was extremely inadequate, you can’t stop whole armies with only one gun, and the assassination attempt on Hitler by his own kind in 1944 doesn’t count, because the assassins didn’t do it for the love of the inferior nations, but were afraid for the fate of their own one again, and one single foreign national had no chance in hell of getting close enough to Hitler to make the world a better place from his perspective.

    My point is that since the main target group of the communists were the homegrown intelligentsia, their ambitions by definition were much smaller compared to the Nazis. Given enough time, the Nazis would have eliminated 90% of the world population, because the definition of inferiority can really be expanded to include 9/10 of the world, at least when calculated by the Nazis, who were extremely generous with their admission guidelines into the inferiors club.

    What I am trying to say is that the target group of the communists – the intelligentsia was much smaller – let’s say 10% of the population of their own country can fit into this category of people that they were after, while the Nazis could really let their imagination go wild when trying to figure out how many nations could qualify as inferior by their standards.

    Very good juxtaposition.

    Bolsheviks/Communists surely killed and murdered large numbers of people, but it was not based on one’s ethnicity. With some exceptions, anyone could choose to become Bolshevik/Communist.
    Pretty much all nationalities of the Tsarist Russian Empire (later Soviet Union) were represented in Bolshevik/Communist leadership and ranks.
    (There was an over-representation of Jews in Bolshevik leadership, but that’s a different subject.)

    Nazi ideology sought to exterminate all Untermenscen – everywhere and anywhere their Einsatzgruppen could reach in force,
    If you were an Untermensch, you couldn’t become an (supposed) Aryan/MasterRace even if you tried. You were dead meat.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Bolsheviks/Communists surely killed and murdered large numbers of people, but it was not based on one’s ethnicity. ...
    .
    (There was an over-representation of Jews in Bolshevik leadership, but that’s a different subject.)
     
    tell that to the white Ukrainians who were genocided in the most horrific way imaginable.. not for anything they did, but for being what they were; independently prosperous white people of ability.

    a phonotype that seems to drive commie-type Jews insane with genocidal hatred

    just as we see today

    so it was prudent of the Nazis to want to protect themselves from such people, and that's why millions of Ukrainians and Poles and Russians and Cossacks and Estonians and Latvians and Croatians and Norwegians and Finns and so many others fought the psychotic, genocidal Bolsheviks.

    It's just too bad that Germany fell under the thrall of racists full of hubris. It would have been better for all if the world would have coalesced to destroy the Bolsheviks, and then reined in Germany.
  145. iffen says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    Create it, will it into existence, exercise it, declare it to be an essential and inviolable part of human dignity.
     
    Any dogma is problematic. I mean, it might work well as a propaganda tool, but eventually parts of the elite get brainwashed by their own bullshit and that's a problem.

    Also, who made the vague and utterly subjective concept of 'human dignity' such a supreme value?

    Also, who made the vague and utterly subjective concept of ‘human dignity’ such a supreme value?

    I do and many others do as well. It is choosing what to value. You don’t value the concept of human dignity?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    You don’t value the concept of human dignity?
     
    I'm just as much for everything good and against everything bad as the next guy. "Human dignity" is something that can mean almost anything. In the Soviet Union, for example, it included, among other things: no unemployment, no homelessness, and completely free medical care. Other ideological constructs ignore all that and emphasize something else, often far less straightforward (like 'free speech').
  146. Rurik says: • Website
    @Avery
    Very good juxtaposition.

    Bolsheviks/Communists surely killed and murdered large numbers of people, but it was not based on one's ethnicity. With some exceptions, anyone could choose to become Bolshevik/Communist.
    Pretty much all nationalities of the Tsarist Russian Empire (later Soviet Union) were represented in Bolshevik/Communist leadership and ranks.
    (There was an over-representation of Jews in Bolshevik leadership, but that's a different subject.)

    Nazi ideology sought to exterminate all Untermenscen - everywhere and anywhere their Einsatzgruppen could reach in force,
    If you were an Untermensch, you couldn't become an (supposed) Aryan/MasterRace even if you tried. You were dead meat.

    Bolsheviks/Communists surely killed and murdered large numbers of people, but it was not based on one’s ethnicity. …
    .
    (There was an over-representation of Jews in Bolshevik leadership, but that’s a different subject.)

    tell that to the white Ukrainians who were genocided in the most horrific way imaginable.. not for anything they did, but for being what they were; independently prosperous white people of ability.

    a phonotype that seems to drive commie-type Jews insane with genocidal hatred

    just as we see today

    so it was prudent of the Nazis to want to protect themselves from such people, and that’s why millions of Ukrainians and Poles and Russians and Cossacks and Estonians and Latvians and Croatians and Norwegians and Finns and so many others fought the psychotic, genocidal Bolsheviks.

    It’s just too bad that Germany fell under the thrall of racists full of hubris. It would have been better for all if the world would have coalesced to destroy the Bolsheviks, and then reined in Germany.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    We have been thru this many times before in many threads.

    Nazis had in mind to exterminate every Slav West of the Urals.
    Every last Slav who was 'useless', and to work the able-bodied to death serving the alleged Master Race.
    If Hitler had satisfied himself with Sudetenland, Germany today would not be a Globalist/Neocon occupied country today, completely neutered, and having sunk so low that their so-called leaders produce PSAs whoring their young German women to Islamist "rapefugees".
    Disgusting.

    As to Bolsheviks/Soviets:

    Hitler and Nazis were totally defeated by Bolsheviks/Communists/Soviets.
    The Read Army did enter Berlin.
    Communists/Soviets did occupy Eastern Europe.
    Life was hard.
    There was political repression.
    But nobody was exterminated because they were Polish, or Hungarian, or......

    In fact, an unintended side-benefit of Soviet occupation was that Eastern Europeans were not corrupted by the Globalist virus, and thus remained Polish, Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks,....
    Only Eastern Europeans in Europe have maintained their nationality, traditions, and Christianity.

    Russia today is a defender of Orthodox Christianity.
    After 70 years of Communist/Soviet misrule, Soviet people themselves rejected Bolshevism/Communism, and solved their problems without Hitler's "help".
    Russia today is slowly, but relentlessly reverting to its ethno-Russian, Orthodox Christian roots and traditions. While decadent Western Europe is rapidly sinking into a putrid swamp.

    Tell me if a march like this could take place in any Western European country today.
    [Poland to Muslims: " Here, Jesus is our King so get out "]
    http://www.unz.com/tsaker/first-they-came-for-the-nazis-and-pedophiles/#comment-1991224

  147. Well, the truth is what is left when the lies die. Unfortunately we are seeing lies defend to the death.

    Read More
  148. @iffen
    Also, who made the vague and utterly subjective concept of ‘human dignity’ such a supreme value?

    I do and many others do as well. It is choosing what to value. You don't value the concept of human dignity?

    You don’t value the concept of human dignity?

    I’m just as much for everything good and against everything bad as the next guy. “Human dignity” is something that can mean almost anything. In the Soviet Union, for example, it included, among other things: no unemployment, no homelessness, and completely free medical care. Other ideological constructs ignore all that and emphasize something else, often far less straightforward (like ‘free speech’).

    Read More
    • Agree: Cyrano
    • Replies: @iffen
    Good valid points.

    My opinion is that I get to do my own valuing (or have the illusion that I am) as opposed to having someone else do my choices for me.
    , @iffen
    among other things: no unemployment, no homelessness

    Strictly speaking, I guess a home and job in the Gulag would qualify; job and home being subjective ideas.
  149. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Mulegino1
    As Wally pointed out above, there are the National Socialists with the alleged 6 million and there are the National Socialists without them. That makes all of the difference in the world. Could it just be that the NSDAP were able to successfully tackle catastrophic unemployment, hopeless indebtedness, unbelievable societal and cultural corruption and restore both prosperity and dignity to a nation- all without resorting to usurious slavery? Could it be that the real sin of the "Nazis" was in resorting to the international barter trade and circumventing both the very "semitic" City of London and Wall Street? Could that- and not some outlandish and mad aggressive quest for "lebensraum" and destruction of the world's "untermenschen" be the real reason that they had to be demonized and destroyed? It sure looks that way, in retrospect. Nobody that I know now, in 2017, will refuse to admit that, in the light of current events, Europe lost the Second World War back in 1945.

    I am a big fan of the Saker, and I understand his visceral anti-Nazism, just as I understand the visceral anti-British sentiments of some of my Irish forebears. The "Great Patriotic War" is far more constitutive of the Russian identity than our own Hollywoodesque "Saving Private Ryan" nonsense is of our American one.

    You seem to suggest that if the Nazis had only arrested Jews, put them in concentration camps, shot a few here and there, and expelled them from their homes — but not killed them — that would have made the Nazis totally swell guys. They also, by the way, expelled ethnic Poles from the Warthegau in the name of ethnic cleansing. Still swell? What about the euthanasia program? Swell, nevertheless?

    You tell me. You tell me what you’re willing to concede they did and we can talk about whether 6 million Jews matters or not to their reputation. Try to answer without engaging in a tu quoque fallacy. We’re talking about the Nazis.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    What is your definition of a "swell guy", incidentally? Yeah, the "Nazis" may have shot a few of them here or there, but "tu quoque" is also a basis for the concept of reciprocity. Just what crime can you realistically accuse the National Socialists of that the Allies-whether Anglo-American or Soviet- did not commit in far greater orders of magnitude? It is quite evident that the greatest crime of Hitler and the Reich was losing the war.
  150. @Chris Mallory
    Egypt had elections, but Israel didn't like who won, so the army took over. The Palestinians hold elections, but Israel doesn't like who wins, so they don't count. Iran holds democratic elections. But the Iranians are hiding nukes under BiBi's bed, so we can't count them.



    Turkey isn't much of a democracy, if they held honest elections the Muslim Brotherhood would win in a landslide.

    Erdogan’s AKP is Turkey’s chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood, and he did not win in a landslide.

    Read More
  151. iffen says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    You don’t value the concept of human dignity?
     
    I'm just as much for everything good and against everything bad as the next guy. "Human dignity" is something that can mean almost anything. In the Soviet Union, for example, it included, among other things: no unemployment, no homelessness, and completely free medical care. Other ideological constructs ignore all that and emphasize something else, often far less straightforward (like 'free speech').

    Good valid points.

    My opinion is that I get to do my own valuing (or have the illusion that I am) as opposed to having someone else do my choices for me.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji
    Yeah, illusion is more like it. We're socially conditioned to take things for granted, to unconsciously accept basic assumptions, cultural values, artifacts, and attitudes.
  152. Cyrano says:

    Happy Nazi day y’all. Today is the day when 78 years ago the Nazis stood up to (the yet to happen to them) Communist oppression, but thank God they were clairvoyant, so we can all enjoy today what they did for humanity.

    They cared so much for all of us that they went into the trouble to stage being attacked by the clueless Polaks, in order not to let the opportunity that wasn’t there slip away. They remind me of some other country, which often stages phony attacks in order to justify aggression – but I’ll let you come up with the name of the culprit.

    I feel that there is a lot of love on this site. Great many humanists who couldn’t be fooled by the Racist ideology of the Nazis, and who know that behind all that rude facade there was a heart of gold beating for all humanity (as long as they were Germans).

    I think that it’s not a coincidence that the Nazis choose the 1st day of school to start the mayhem, because they were planing to take the world to school and teach them something. Luckily, the world never graduated and is as stupid as it has ever been, and soon somebody may take it to school again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    a heart of gold beating for all humanity (as long as they were Germans).
     
    Yeah, exactly. This should also provide the definite answer to the apparently burning question of whether they were socialists or not: yes, for the Germans; slavery for the rest.
  153. iffen says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    You don’t value the concept of human dignity?
     
    I'm just as much for everything good and against everything bad as the next guy. "Human dignity" is something that can mean almost anything. In the Soviet Union, for example, it included, among other things: no unemployment, no homelessness, and completely free medical care. Other ideological constructs ignore all that and emphasize something else, often far less straightforward (like 'free speech').

    among other things: no unemployment, no homelessness

    Strictly speaking, I guess a home and job in the Gulag would qualify; job and home being subjective ideas.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji

    I guess a home and job in the Gulag would qualify
     
    See, this is what meant by 'unconsciously accepting basic assumptions', cultural myths. 'GULAG' was (till late 1950s, when it disappeared) the Soviet equivalent of American 'BOP' (the Bureau of Prisons).

    If you watch 1967 film Cool Hand Luke, you might, perhaps, find it even more damning than One Day of Ivan Denisovich, and yet the word 'BOP' has no cultural significance, produces no emotional response. There's been no massive decades-long campaign to popularize and mythologize the evils of any western prison system. Not because they were so much better, but simply because there's no reason to do it.
    , @Cyrano
    You are so witty that they should put you in a witless protection program.
  154. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Can you please provide a source for your claim that the Germans planned to kill Slavs en mass in the occupied SU, in particular using methods employed by the Americans against the Indians?

    Start with Mein Kampf for both. Also the concept of Lebensraum for the Nazis requird the extermination of what they felt were inferior, savage races on land that should belong to the ubermensch. Hitler apparantly admired the U.S. approach to the Indians as a model for the final solution and Lebensraum.

    Read More
  155. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Can you please provide a source for your claim that the Germans planned to kill Slavs en mass in the occupied SU, in particular using methods employed by the Americans against the Indians?

    I don’t know if the methods to be used would have been exactly like those used against the Indians, but Hitler’s plan for western Russia was brutal. It was know as Generalplan Ost.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost

    Read More
  156. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Can you please provide a source for your claim that the Germans planned to kill Slavs en mass in the occupied SU, in particular using methods employed by the Americans against the Indians?

    Mein Kampf is the primary source. Followed by a number of recent books, such as “Hitler’s American Model.” Indian scholars have also done a lot of work on this. But Google is now disabling those sites. Your best route is to find a scholarly Indian/Native American site. And then do your search from there. Sorry I can’t be of more help. But I have my hands full battling cancer.

    Read More
  157. @iffen
    Good valid points.

    My opinion is that I get to do my own valuing (or have the illusion that I am) as opposed to having someone else do my choices for me.

    Yeah, illusion is more like it. We’re socially conditioned to take things for granted, to unconsciously accept basic assumptions, cultural values, artifacts, and attitudes.

    Read More
  158. @Beefcake the Mighty
    Can you please provide a source for your claim that the Germans planned to kill Slavs en mass in the occupied SU, in particular using methods employed by the Americans against the Indians?

    Further to my previous reply:

    Writing in, Mein Kampf (My Struggle), in 1924, Hitler declared,

    “We National Socialists consciously draw a line through the foreign policy trend of our pre-War period. We take up at the halting place of six hundred years ago. We terminate the endless German drive to the south and west of Europe, and turn our gaze toward the lands in the east. We finally terminate the colonial and trade policy of the pre-War period and proceed to the territorial policy of the future … if we talk about new soil and territory in Europe today, we can think primarily only of Russia and its vassal border states.”

    Minutes of Hitler Conference, 17 October 1941
    “There is only one task: Germanization through the introduction of Germans [to the area] and to treat the original inhabitants like Indians. … I intend to stay this course with ice-cold determination. I feel myself to be the executor of the will of History. What people think of me at present is all of no consequence. Never have I heard a German who has bread to eat express concern that the ground where the grain was grown had to be conquered by the sword. We eat Canadian wheat and never think of the Indians.”

    And speaking of the Ukraine, Himmler stated:
    “Without end, the steppes of the Russian area extend [to] eastern Europe. Abrupt and sudden is the difference between the cultural levels of central Europe and the gigantic districts [to the east]. And yet, on both sides of the frontier there is the same soil, but not the same people. Only man alone is able to impress his stamp upon the country. Therefore, on the one side the well ordered fertility, planned harmony of fields and carefully designed villages of Germany, and on the other side the zones of an impenetrable jungle, of the steppes, of never ending primeval forests, where silting rivers painfully cut their ways.

    Badly exploited, fertile soil of black earth that could be a paradise, a California of Europe, and in reality abandoned, dreadfully neglected, branded with the stamp of a crime against culture beyond imagination even today, is a perpetual accusation against the sub-human and his rule.”

    Read More
  159. I see the old myth about Lebensraum and Mein Kampf is being trotted out (along with the good ol’ Generalplan Ost boogeyman).

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    The best thing about this site, and Internet in general, is again and again confirming the essentials of human nature.
    Regardless of accumulated knowledge and advances in technology we are, on average, the same as, say, in Roman times.

    I truly believe Jews rule the world for one reason only: they, being hardworking and intelligent, have really developed, throughout history, great social intelligence and read and understand people better than the rest.
    And, of course, use that knowledge to their advantage.

    For example, here, as everywhere, around 90 % of people aren't to debate to learn something, so, maybe change, based on facts, some of their approach.
    No, they are here to reinforce their own preexisting thoughts.
    And feelings.....sort of therapy. Scott Adams could say more about it.
    Method is simple: keep hammering own approach.....just.....keep.....hammering.....
    As everywhere else.
    Just.......keep............hammering........

    There is no reflection, introspection......

    I've been on the Internet since its inception, and it's funny how it's not only the same in general, it's getting worse.
    At least before not everybody had PC and dialup, so there was some filtering out of pub/schoolyard mentality.
    Now, whoah...............

    One has to skim through 100 comments to find a couple of lines of useful input.
    Everywhere.

    Good thing about this site is, apparently, not fast banning of....."dissent".....
    So far.

    Nazi/Hitler worshipers will never, ever, get Slavic peoples to accept that ideology and person.
    Save certain very small elements within, mostly, Catholic Slavs (Croats and Ukrainians in particular).
    Having said that, of course, those peoples do accept some elements within that ideology and person.
    Exemplary nationalism, some parts of economy/society in general.
    Military wise, could write 10 pages. For example, Soviets used their own version of Blitzkrieg.
    Hitler own self-discipline
    Etc.

    It's really interesting watching online debates about the treatment of Slavs by Nazis.
    Not because of the topic but because of personalities involved.
    One can see a PhD material (intelligence, education, erudition...knowledge of certain facts) capable of such.....delusion.....that's truly fascinating.
    Good fun actually.

    , @simplyamazed
    You asked for proof and you got it. Closed minds admit no light or understanding.
  160. Avery says:
    @Rurik

    Bolsheviks/Communists surely killed and murdered large numbers of people, but it was not based on one’s ethnicity. ...
    .
    (There was an over-representation of Jews in Bolshevik leadership, but that’s a different subject.)
     
    tell that to the white Ukrainians who were genocided in the most horrific way imaginable.. not for anything they did, but for being what they were; independently prosperous white people of ability.

    a phonotype that seems to drive commie-type Jews insane with genocidal hatred

    just as we see today

    so it was prudent of the Nazis to want to protect themselves from such people, and that's why millions of Ukrainians and Poles and Russians and Cossacks and Estonians and Latvians and Croatians and Norwegians and Finns and so many others fought the psychotic, genocidal Bolsheviks.

    It's just too bad that Germany fell under the thrall of racists full of hubris. It would have been better for all if the world would have coalesced to destroy the Bolsheviks, and then reined in Germany.

    We have been thru this many times before in many threads.

    Nazis had in mind to exterminate every Slav West of the Urals.
    Every last Slav who was ‘useless’, and to work the able-bodied to death serving the alleged Master Race.
    If Hitler had satisfied himself with Sudetenland, Germany today would not be a Globalist/Neocon occupied country today, completely neutered, and having sunk so low that their so-called leaders produce PSAs whoring their young German women to Islamist “rapefugees”.
    Disgusting.

    As to Bolsheviks/Soviets:

    Hitler and Nazis were totally defeated by Bolsheviks/Communists/Soviets.
    The Read Army did enter Berlin.
    Communists/Soviets did occupy Eastern Europe.
    Life was hard.
    There was political repression.
    But nobody was exterminated because they were Polish, or Hungarian, or……

    In fact, an unintended side-benefit of Soviet occupation was that Eastern Europeans were not corrupted by the Globalist virus, and thus remained Polish, Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks,….
    Only Eastern Europeans in Europe have maintained their nationality, traditions, and Christianity.

    Russia today is a defender of Orthodox Christianity.
    After 70 years of Communist/Soviet misrule, Soviet people themselves rejected Bolshevism/Communism, and solved their problems without Hitler’s “help”.
    Russia today is slowly, but relentlessly reverting to its ethno-Russian, Orthodox Christian roots and traditions. While decadent Western Europe is rapidly sinking into a putrid swamp.

    Tell me if a march like this could take place in any Western European country today.
    [Poland to Muslims: " Here, Jesus is our King so get out "]

    http://www.unz.com/tsaker/first-they-came-for-the-nazis-and-pedophiles/#comment-1991224

    Read More
    • Replies: @Avery
    [Poland to Muslims: " Here, Jesus is our King so get out "]


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LizUthm_Sw
    , @Rurik

    But nobody was exterminated because they were Polish, or Hungarian, or……
     
    tell that to the people at Katyn, or Bela Kun's victims, or the Kulaks...

    how many of those thousands of Polish officers and priests and professors and authors and poets and others who had their hands tied behind their backs and forced to stand at the edge of a ditch while a NKVD orc but a bullet in their brain, were Jewish? Eh? The only Jews at katyn were wearing NKVD officer uniforms.

    Bolshevism was a genocidal agenda to slaughter the best of the Gentiles (where have we heard that before) and then enslave the remaining masses.

    it is written

    I've never been a fan of the Nazis. I think they were arrogant and full of racial hubris. But when I see what's happening today, as the world's Jews are hell bent on destroying Western civilization and its people, and heaping scorn on our heritage and demonizing our very phenotype as evil...

    I start to wonder if perhaps the Nazis had no choice but to fight those Bolsheviks, or risk coming under their genocidal fist of hatred.

    If you had a choice to be a Palestinian today, and see your loved ones humiliated and murdered and their property stolen by their worst enemies...

    or fight them. Which would you do?

    Everything I have ever heard from the PTB about the Palestinians since I've been alive, has been sinister lies that blame the victim, while giving a pass to the murderers and criminals (indeed, making the genocidal murderers out to be the victims!). Why should I think the ((PTB)) are going to be any more fair to the Nazis as they make their billionth movie and write their trillionth lie?

    were the Nazis racial supremacists and capable of murder? I suppose so, and for that I revile them. But were their enemies a thousand times worse? It sure seems like that to me.

    How different were the Nazis at their rallies from the Poles in that video Avery?

    Nationalistic and racially proud- demanding their unwillingness to let International Jewry destroy their nation - like it did in the last century.

    whether their rallying cry is religious or racial. The only thing missing from that video of the Polish march and rally is roman salutes.

  161. @Cyrano
    Happy Nazi day y’all. Today is the day when 78 years ago the Nazis stood up to (the yet to happen to them) Communist oppression, but thank God they were clairvoyant, so we can all enjoy today what they did for humanity.

    They cared so much for all of us that they went into the trouble to stage being attacked by the clueless Polaks, in order not to let the opportunity that wasn’t there slip away. They remind me of some other country, which often stages phony attacks in order to justify aggression – but I’ll let you come up with the name of the culprit.

    I feel that there is a lot of love on this site. Great many humanists who couldn’t be fooled by the Racist ideology of the Nazis, and who know that behind all that rude facade there was a heart of gold beating for all humanity (as long as they were Germans).

    I think that it’s not a coincidence that the Nazis choose the 1st day of school to start the mayhem, because they were planing to take the world to school and teach them something. Luckily, the world never graduated and is as stupid as it has ever been, and soon somebody may take it to school again.

    a heart of gold beating for all humanity (as long as they were Germans).

    Yeah, exactly. This should also provide the definite answer to the apparently burning question of whether they were socialists or not: yes, for the Germans; slavery for the rest.

    Read More
  162. Though an image is probably stronger, the words “Nazi” and “pedophile” often have the same effect:

    What irony.

    Though homos are sold as victims of Nazis, anti-Nazi voices tried to discredit Hitler and Nazis as a bunch of homos.

    http://www.irishexaminer.com/lifestyle/features/the-peculiar-sex-life-of-adolf-hitler-offers-insight-into-the-dictators-gay-partners-391500.html

    By the early 1930s, the homosexual ethos at the top of the Nazi Party was so evident that one anti-Nazi newspaper called the political organisation “The Brotherhood of Poofs”. The media ridicule became so widespread that Hitler decided to do something drastic to change public perceptions.

    http://thepeculiarsexlifeofadolfhitler.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-peculiar-sex-life-of-adolf-hitler_5.html

    Read More
  163. Mulegino1 says:
    @Anon
    You seem to suggest that if the Nazis had only arrested Jews, put them in concentration camps, shot a few here and there, and expelled them from their homes -- but not killed them -- that would have made the Nazis totally swell guys. They also, by the way, expelled ethnic Poles from the Warthegau in the name of ethnic cleansing. Still swell? What about the euthanasia program? Swell, nevertheless?

    You tell me. You tell me what you're willing to concede they did and we can talk about whether 6 million Jews matters or not to their reputation. Try to answer without engaging in a tu quoque fallacy. We're talking about the Nazis.

    What is your definition of a “swell guy”, incidentally? Yeah, the “Nazis” may have shot a few of them here or there, but “tu quoque” is also a basis for the concept of reciprocity. Just what crime can you realistically accuse the National Socialists of that the Allies-whether Anglo-American or Soviet- did not commit in far greater orders of magnitude? It is quite evident that the greatest crime of Hitler and the Reich was losing the war.

    Read More
  164. peterAUS says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty
    I see the old myth about Lebensraum and Mein Kampf is being trotted out (along with the good ol' Generalplan Ost boogeyman).

    The best thing about this site, and Internet in general, is again and again confirming the essentials of human nature.
    Regardless of accumulated knowledge and advances in technology we are, on average, the same as, say, in Roman times.

    I truly believe Jews rule the world for one reason only: they, being hardworking and intelligent, have really developed, throughout history, great social intelligence and read and understand people better than the rest.
    And, of course, use that knowledge to their advantage.

    For example, here, as everywhere, around 90 % of people aren’t to debate to learn something, so, maybe change, based on facts, some of their approach.
    No, they are here to reinforce their own preexisting thoughts.
    And feelings…..sort of therapy. Scott Adams could say more about it.
    Method is simple: keep hammering own approach…..just…..keep…..hammering…..
    As everywhere else.
    Just…….keep…………hammering……..

    There is no reflection, introspection……

    I’ve been on the Internet since its inception, and it’s funny how it’s not only the same in general, it’s getting worse.
    At least before not everybody had PC and dialup, so there was some filtering out of pub/schoolyard mentality.
    Now, whoah……………

    One has to skim through 100 comments to find a couple of lines of useful input.
    Everywhere.

    Good thing about this site is, apparently, not fast banning of…..”dissent”…..
    So far.

    Nazi/Hitler worshipers will never, ever, get Slavic peoples to accept that ideology and person.
    Save certain very small elements within, mostly, Catholic Slavs (Croats and Ukrainians in particular).
    Having said that, of course, those peoples do accept some elements within that ideology and person.
    Exemplary nationalism, some parts of economy/society in general.
    Military wise, could write 10 pages. For example, Soviets used their own version of Blitzkrieg.
    Hitler own self-discipline
    Etc.

    It’s really interesting watching online debates about the treatment of Slavs by Nazis.
    Not because of the topic but because of personalities involved.
    One can see a PhD material (intelligence, education, erudition…knowledge of certain facts) capable of such…..delusion…..that’s truly fascinating.
    Good fun actually.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    The Jews as a collective were, historically, a very backward people consigned to the obscurantism of the Talmudic ghetto until the late eighteenth century, when their more enlightened elements decided to make a Faustian bargain with high European culture, and cast off their servitude to Talmdudic rubbish for some genuine civilization. Their intellectual and scientific history is essentially Asiatic, since they are not innovators nor particularly creative, but appropriators and- to a certain degree- are able to improve upon prototypes.

    As a people, their chief claim to fame will always be their rejection of the Divine Logos in deference to servitude - and perhaps, privilege- in Caesar's Empire. The remedy for them is conversion, not the obstinant insistence that the rest of the world defer to their chauvinism or crystalline sensibilities.

  165. Avery says:
    @Avery
    We have been thru this many times before in many threads.

    Nazis had in mind to exterminate every Slav West of the Urals.
    Every last Slav who was 'useless', and to work the able-bodied to death serving the alleged Master Race.
    If Hitler had satisfied himself with Sudetenland, Germany today would not be a Globalist/Neocon occupied country today, completely neutered, and having sunk so low that their so-called leaders produce PSAs whoring their young German women to Islamist "rapefugees".
    Disgusting.

    As to Bolsheviks/Soviets:

    Hitler and Nazis were totally defeated by Bolsheviks/Communists/Soviets.
    The Read Army did enter Berlin.
    Communists/Soviets did occupy Eastern Europe.
    Life was hard.
    There was political repression.
    But nobody was exterminated because they were Polish, or Hungarian, or......

    In fact, an unintended side-benefit of Soviet occupation was that Eastern Europeans were not corrupted by the Globalist virus, and thus remained Polish, Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks,....
    Only Eastern Europeans in Europe have maintained their nationality, traditions, and Christianity.

    Russia today is a defender of Orthodox Christianity.
    After 70 years of Communist/Soviet misrule, Soviet people themselves rejected Bolshevism/Communism, and solved their problems without Hitler's "help".
    Russia today is slowly, but relentlessly reverting to its ethno-Russian, Orthodox Christian roots and traditions. While decadent Western Europe is rapidly sinking into a putrid swamp.

    Tell me if a march like this could take place in any Western European country today.
    [Poland to Muslims: " Here, Jesus is our King so get out "]
    http://www.unz.com/tsaker/first-they-came-for-the-nazis-and-pedophiles/#comment-1991224

    [Poland to Muslims: " Here, Jesus is our King so get out "]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LizUthm_Sw

    Read More
  166. Mulegino1 says:
    @peterAUS
    The best thing about this site, and Internet in general, is again and again confirming the essentials of human nature.
    Regardless of accumulated knowledge and advances in technology we are, on average, the same as, say, in Roman times.

    I truly believe Jews rule the world for one reason only: they, being hardworking and intelligent, have really developed, throughout history, great social intelligence and read and understand people better than the rest.
    And, of course, use that knowledge to their advantage.

    For example, here, as everywhere, around 90 % of people aren't to debate to learn something, so, maybe change, based on facts, some of their approach.
    No, they are here to reinforce their own preexisting thoughts.
    And feelings.....sort of therapy. Scott Adams could say more about it.
    Method is simple: keep hammering own approach.....just.....keep.....hammering.....
    As everywhere else.
    Just.......keep............hammering........

    There is no reflection, introspection......

    I've been on the Internet since its inception, and it's funny how it's not only the same in general, it's getting worse.
    At least before not everybody had PC and dialup, so there was some filtering out of pub/schoolyard mentality.
    Now, whoah...............

    One has to skim through 100 comments to find a couple of lines of useful input.
    Everywhere.

    Good thing about this site is, apparently, not fast banning of....."dissent".....
    So far.

    Nazi/Hitler worshipers will never, ever, get Slavic peoples to accept that ideology and person.
    Save certain very small elements within, mostly, Catholic Slavs (Croats and Ukrainians in particular).
    Having said that, of course, those peoples do accept some elements within that ideology and person.
    Exemplary nationalism, some parts of economy/society in general.
    Military wise, could write 10 pages. For example, Soviets used their own version of Blitzkrieg.
    Hitler own self-discipline
    Etc.

    It's really interesting watching online debates about the treatment of Slavs by Nazis.
    Not because of the topic but because of personalities involved.
    One can see a PhD material (intelligence, education, erudition...knowledge of certain facts) capable of such.....delusion.....that's truly fascinating.
    Good fun actually.

    The Jews as a collective were, historically, a very backward people consigned to the obscurantism of the Talmudic ghetto until the late eighteenth century, when their more enlightened elements decided to make a Faustian bargain with high European culture, and cast off their servitude to Talmdudic rubbish for some genuine civilization. Their intellectual and scientific history is essentially Asiatic, since they are not innovators nor particularly creative, but appropriators and- to a certain degree- are able to improve upon prototypes.

    As a people, their chief claim to fame will always be their rejection of the Divine Logos in deference to servitude – and perhaps, privilege- in Caesar’s Empire. The remedy for them is conversion, not the obstinant insistence that the rest of the world defer to their chauvinism or crystalline sensibilities.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    As I said:

    One can see a PhD material (intelligence, education, erudition…knowledge of certain facts) capable of such…..delusion…..that’s truly fascinating.
     
    Exploring that....trait/characteristic.....is interesting.

    I've seen that all over the board, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion.

    A lot of that against Jews, of course.

    I really admire that capability.

    "Jews are stupid"----"They rule the world"
    "US Empire is weak"----"US Empire destroys the world"
    "Western way of life is s&*t"----"We don't want any border control" (direction of travel is obvious).
    "THEIR military is weak"----"We must invest more in our military to defend against THEM".
    Etc...etc.....
    LONG list.

    Related to topic:
    China and Russia are the beacons of civilized world----They censor the free speech at least as West.

    And, true, for the author of the article, as a couple of commentators posted here, blatant censorship on own site.
    Let alone "Russia is so better than USA"----"I, with strong ethnic Russian roots, prefer living in USA".

    Oh, there is more.

    "We are so concerned about preserving free Internet, privacy there...blah...blah.."----"We have no clue how all that works in technical sense. And of course, it's just BOOOORIING learning that."

    Good fun.

  167. peterAUS says:
    @Mulegino1
    The Jews as a collective were, historically, a very backward people consigned to the obscurantism of the Talmudic ghetto until the late eighteenth century, when their more enlightened elements decided to make a Faustian bargain with high European culture, and cast off their servitude to Talmdudic rubbish for some genuine civilization. Their intellectual and scientific history is essentially Asiatic, since they are not innovators nor particularly creative, but appropriators and- to a certain degree- are able to improve upon prototypes.

    As a people, their chief claim to fame will always be their rejection of the Divine Logos in deference to servitude - and perhaps, privilege- in Caesar's Empire. The remedy for them is conversion, not the obstinant insistence that the rest of the world defer to their chauvinism or crystalline sensibilities.

    As I said:

    One can see a PhD material (intelligence, education, erudition…knowledge of certain facts) capable of such…..delusion…..that’s truly fascinating.

    Exploring that….trait/characteristic…..is interesting.

    I’ve seen that all over the board, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion.

    A lot of that against Jews, of course.

    I really admire that capability.

    “Jews are stupid”—-”They rule the world”
    “US Empire is weak”—-”US Empire destroys the world”
    “Western way of life is s&*t”—-”We don’t want any border control” (direction of travel is obvious).
    “THEIR military is weak”—-”We must invest more in our military to defend against THEM”.
    Etc…etc…..
    LONG list.

    Related to topic:
    China and Russia are the beacons of civilized world—-They censor the free speech at least as West.

    And, true, for the author of the article, as a couple of commentators posted here, blatant censorship on own site.
    Let alone “Russia is so better than USA”—-”I, with strong ethnic Russian roots, prefer living in USA”.

    Oh, there is more.

    “We are so concerned about preserving free Internet, privacy there…blah…blah..”—-”We have no clue how all that works in technical sense. And of course, it’s just BOOOORIING learning that.”

    Good fun.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    The "Jews" are not stupid and they do not rule the world. They are clever, in their social networking and collective indulgence with self-promotion, but individually, they are not all that. Their putative "genius" lies mostly with social networking and publicity hounding - not too difficult when they control the message and the media.

    Their international leadership, however, incarnates the spirit of Antichrist, so they have powerful allies in their metaphysical battles against all that is good, decent, innocent, truthful and beautiful. That is why they- as a collective - have never been good at architecture, music, the arts or industry. They are good at flim flam, superficial noise making, cheap publicity, and common crimes such as white slavery, pornography and the international drug trade.

    The very best of the Jews- the Bobby Fischers, the Gerard Menuhins, the Gilad Atzmons, the Israel Shahaks, the Brother Nathaniels, inter alia - are good because their common humanity eclipses their own tribal chauvinism.

  168. Seraphim says:

    Brilliant confirmation of Godwin’s Law.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Veritatis
    Interesting comment as usual. Thought you could be interested in: http://magister.blogautore.espresso.republics.it/2017/08/29/liturgy-the-counterstatement-of-cardinal-sarah/ There is a mention of epiclesis at the end.
  169. @Priss Factor
    DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts.

    Stormfront is something that might be called genuinely neo-nazi. It is serious or thinks it is.

    In contrast, Daily Stormer reads like a sendup of neo-nazism, and one could take it almost as parody,and it may well be in the case of Weev, who I think is mainly in it for the notoriety. As for Anglin, some believe he's an agent. He could be. He is such a freak. He looks like some mixed-race redneck inbred retard. And yet, and this is what's strange, he comes across as reasonably intelligent and even thoughtful(if he wants to be). I wish Spencer didn't stoop to sharing a forum with Anglin, but Anglin can come across as half-intelligent if he tries:

    https://youtu.be/Rm-AIZib0io?t=11m40s

    Because he seems too smart to have such retarded views, some say he must be a FBI agent, a plant. But if he is such, why the clampdown on him? But then, maybe that's part of the plan. Anglin acts totally outrageous, and his behavior justifies the shutdown, and that is used to shut down other people as well.

    Also, I don't think most people who went to Daily Stormer went for serious opinions. They just relished the sense of outrage, crank-up of outlandish headlines.

    Still, DS issue is important for free speech. If DS today, what tomorrow? It's the principle that counts.

    I must take issue with the idea that Nazism was abhorrent. If anything, its problem was a kind of pathological normalism. Nazism showed that excessive and radical attention to health, order, normality, and cleanliness can also be a kind of sickness and perversion. It was excessively anti-septic. In contrast, the problem of something like pedophilia, homomania, and etc is they are excessively septic.

    It's like it isn't healthy either to wallow in filth & mud OR be concerned compulsively with purity & cleanliness. Someone who never washes and acts gross is disgusting. But a germ-freak who obsessively-compulsively tries to maintain hygiene and order is also sick. Organism must seek health and order away from mess and chaos, but it must also accept that it too, as a lifeform, is always in a process of growth and decay. Nazism was like life frozen into perfection. It looked good but wasn't organic.
    You can't drink frozen milk. Of course, you can't drink spoiled milk either. Weimar Germany just let the milk of Germany go bad. For milk to turn into useful culture(like yogurt or sour cream), it has to allow certain kinds of germs to grow under certain conditions. That way, milk is both alive as culture and healthy to consume.

    To an extent, elements in Nazism was a healthy reaction to the excesses of Weimar Germany. But then, Nazism, a kind of radical racist Mormonism, went the other extreme and was excessively obsessed with normality, purity, order, beauty, hygiene, and perfection.

    What people need is a kind of humanism that strives for health, order, and normality but also understands that life is, at its core, chaotic, messy, imperfect, and filled with germs. No matter how much one washes, one can only clean the skin, the surface. The body itself if filled with all sorts of bacteria, viruses, and other foreign elements. And there are all sorts of problems of health, emotions, psychology, etc. There is a broad sense of normality, but there is no perfect normal. And even most normal people have tendencies that are abnormal. Humanism urges us to be tolerant and forgiving of imperfections and problems that are inherent to life. Also, abnormality is often the stuff of genius and inspiration in certain individuals.
    But Nazism was so much into normality, beauty, healthy, and striving for perfection that it turned into a kind of perversion in its own right.
    Also, despite the heroic and noble iconography of Nazism with its 'Aryan' art and such, the key figures of Nazism were pathological dark-souled individuals like Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, and etc. In a way, radical normality and cult of perfection were crutches for their sense of insecurity, inferiority, and anxiety. Now, it's okay for people to have anxieties as no one is god or some superhero. Everyone has weaknesses and disadvantages. A smart person can be ugly. A handsome person can be dumb. A beautiful woman can have unpleasant voice, like in SINGING IN THE RAIN. A woman with beautiful voice may not be much of a looker, like those fat broads in opera. But the cretinous leaders of Nazism could never address their own complexes and neuroses and just buried them under the cult of heroism and megalomania. And this repression fueled their neuroses even further.

    Nazism also failed because many sane and sound people with normal dispositions tend to be weak in personality and haven't the will to step forth and take control. A good example would be Albert Speer. He was essentially a decent man but of weak personality. Not the kind to step forth and take charge of things. Instead, such men let others with stronger personality to take center stage. And they latch onto such figures. (We see this with Neocons and cucks too. Whatever one may say about Jews, they have strong forceful personalities and take charge of power, narrative, and authority. Those with weaker personalities, the Peter Keatings of the world, latch onto forceful Jews. Look at cucks like Marco Rubio, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Rich Lowry, Lindsey Graham, and etc. McCain has a temper but no personality. These types only know how to latch onto the Strong personality. And today's 'new hitlers' are the Zionist globalist with a diabolical lust for world control. They got super-chutzpah, and weaker-souled white gentile cucks just go along with stuff like 'gay marriage', Russia Hacking hysteria, 'diversity is our strength', and homo symbols in christian churches.)
    This was true of Mao and those around him. Mao had a very strong personality, and others latched onto him. Zhou En-Lai was more sensible and more intelligent, but he didn't have a strong personality. He didn't know how to take charge. So, the strong personality took charge, and others latched onto him.

    Now, over time, as a system becomes firmly established, there is no more need for strong personalities. Look at China today, and it's impossible for anyone like Mao to come to power. And USSR after Stalin's death could no longer tolerate strong personalities. Consensus of Power was what mattered. When Khrushchev was deemed too erratic, they got rid of him, and the system was ruled by a collective politburo. If Nazism had survived, something similar might have happened after Hitler's death. But Hitler came to power in a world of chaos, and in such a time, a man with forceful personality and magnetism had the clear advantage. And Hitler had it. Normal Germans failed to restore order and balance during the Weimar yrs. They lacked the will, guts, courage, and vision. In contrast, Hitler, for all his deficiencies, had those qualities. And for a time, he restored Germany to its greatness. And if he'd died in 1939, it might have been mostly a happy story for Germany. But he lived on, and his pathological nature simply couldn't stop gambling with history as the new Man of Destiny. And normal sane Germans like Albert Speer who'd failed during the Weimar yrs also failed by lacking the will to say NO to Hitler. But then, the opponents of Nazism also deserve much blame because they squandered their chance to create a sane healthy democracy during the Weimar yrs. Those yrs were not only economically catastrophic. People can weather material hard times with morale and dignity under inspired leadership. It was the cultural filth and moral collapse of Germany that led to so much anger and frustration, like in SERPENT EGG by Bergman.

    https://youtu.be/R2nIe1G6R1s?t=7m16s

    https://youtu.be/rAB2qGdh_lY?t=13m22s

    Obviously, Weimar Germany was culturally sick. Granted, there were genuine artistic achievements in many fields in this period, but society as a whole had lost its bearing, much like Russia in the 90s when it too fell prey to globalists. But instead of combating the disease with national humanism or national spiritualism like Putin did, Hitler and co. pushed for the extreme opposite. IF someone is fat disgusting slob, you try to bring him to health. You don't try to make him pump iron and swallow tons of vitamins and protein supplements to become invincible Terminator. But then, Nazism was bound to be contradictory as it was a Radical Normal Ideology led by bohemians and eccentrics. Hitler and Goebbels were would-be artists who felt at ease with bohemian lifestyles. And yet, esp Hitler had mostly bourgeois tastes and was a misfit in the modernist cultural milieu. Hitler's bohemianism felt at odds with respectable society, but his taste for beauty and form made him a misfit among modernism then in rage. If Nazi leaders had been more honest about their own contradictions, they might have found ways to resolve them. But they repressed them and played the role of transcendent visionary saviors of the nation. And so, their complexes fueled their madness further. In a way, their excessive radical normalism was a desperate way to repress their anxieties and neuroses that were more in tune with modernity. Though MAX isn't a very good movie, it does touch on the contradiction of Hitlerism, a 19th century bohemian romantic sensibility trapped in the world of modernity.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jrs7qk503Y

    An eccentric man too discomfited with his obvious strangeness and unable to confront his own demons, thereby seeking escapism in mythic heroism of history as a grand opera. Hitler couldn't confront his demons so he turned them into avenging angels.

    As for pornography, I think it's made all the worse by homomania. Because homos have been sacralized, we aren't supposed to say negative things about dangerous practice of fecal penetration that greatly increases the likelihood of anal cancer. So, it's spread to real-sexual people too. Also, with pornographic images being so ubiquitous, people need extra kink to get excited. Also, with Negro men increasingly conquering white vaginas, white guys feel a need to feel power over women by some 'extreme' act, and that is bungholery. Since there's a good chance that the vagina of some white 'thot' has already been taken by a Negro, the only way a white guy can act like he's conquering the white female is by violating her bungy.

    But far more problematic than porn itself is the pornification of culture, i.e. the barrier that used to exist between porn and rest of culture is rapidly dissolving. Ariana Grande is supposed to be entertainment for young girls, and yet her songs are totally porny. When 10 yr old girls are allowed to attend her concert by her parents, pornification is seeping down to children. And if kids are thus sexualized, doesn't it essentially normalize pedophilia, at least step by step? If pornified pop culture is suitable for kids, it means kids are sexual creatures. If so, why shouldn't they engage in sex? Furthermore, if even elementary school kids are taught about ass-buggery, won't young boys think, "it's okay to have pee pee in my poo poo?" If adults allow young kids to think like this, pedophilia will gradually become normalized.

    “…DAILY STORMER is a freakshow of sorts.”

    It is a simple and brutal fact of life that the average American is a functional illiterate with the attention span of a house fly.

    They have been engineered that way by the same people who are the primary subject matter of the DAILY STORMER, (largely as a matter of their own self- defense) to make sure that they will never be able to read and
    understand books such as 200 Years
    Together by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
    .

    Even if he or she desires to read Solzhenitsyns great work ( It is de facto banned in the U.S.) any American born after about 1980 and who went to a public school will have difficulty in reading a long block of text for content, because it is a skill no longer taught to American school children; the public educational system now relies almost entirely on electronic screens and moving images.

    It quite literally hurts younger peoples heads to make the attempt!

    Through memes and humor DS publisher Andrew Anglin took center stage among this cohort- the “maul”right, generation Z(yclon).

    No virtue signalling here, Anglin made white- ethno National Socialism “cool” and “squared away”- as opposed to the cuck libertarians; like that stoner “what’s Allepo?” guy…

    The average Joe has to be made to understand, somehow, if there is to be any hope for any kind of a livable future, that the same people who won’t publish one of the greatest writers of the 20th century are the same cabal that has declared that White cohesion is racist and uniquely evil.

    Read More
  170. @Mulegino1
    As Wally pointed out above, there are the National Socialists with the alleged 6 million and there are the National Socialists without them. That makes all of the difference in the world. Could it just be that the NSDAP were able to successfully tackle catastrophic unemployment, hopeless indebtedness, unbelievable societal and cultural corruption and restore both prosperity and dignity to a nation- all without resorting to usurious slavery? Could it be that the real sin of the "Nazis" was in resorting to the international barter trade and circumventing both the very "semitic" City of London and Wall Street? Could that- and not some outlandish and mad aggressive quest for "lebensraum" and destruction of the world's "untermenschen" be the real reason that they had to be demonized and destroyed? It sure looks that way, in retrospect. Nobody that I know now, in 2017, will refuse to admit that, in the light of current events, Europe lost the Second World War back in 1945.

    I am a big fan of the Saker, and I understand his visceral anti-Nazism, just as I understand the visceral anti-British sentiments of some of my Irish forebears. The "Great Patriotic War" is far more constitutive of the Russian identity than our own Hollywoodesque "Saving Private Ryan" nonsense is of our American one.

    Damnit! I used my one “agree” upthread.

    Well said.

    Read More
  171. @War for Blair Mountain
    When the Historic Native Born White American Majority Working Class is demographically eleminated across America...The Hindus in Charlottesville will get to enjoy the full benefits of the Anglo Saxon conquest of North America. And White Liberal Tears for the American Injun will be quickly flushed down the toilet bowl.... never to be heard from again.

    WfBM,

    I sense you have some problems with people like vonBraun, Tesla, Igor Sikorsky, Zworykin, Yul Brynner, Prokofiev, Fermi, Delbrueck …

    I purposely omitted Szilard, von Neuman, Einstein, Edward Teller…

    Read More
  172. Why are there still neo-nazis?

    Some are federal agents. Some are just goofballs hungry for attention, like kids shoving frogs down girls’ dresses. But there are some people who really are hardcore and into all that 88 and Holocaust Desecration stuff. Why?

    I think the answer lies not in ideology or morality but in personality.

    There are Extreme Personalities, and they must have things hardcore. They are ‘phobic’ of moderation or balance.

    We see this in everything. Take tattoos. All tats are ugly, but some people have just a little, and that’s okay. But for some, that is not enough. They gotta cover their whole bodies.
    Take alcohol. Most drinkers just wanna get a bit tipsy and feel good. But some just gotta got smashing drunk. They just gotta. Enough is never enough. Some gotta go even beyond with meth and heroin.
    Take religion. Most religious folks are content to be faithful. But some religious folks feel this need to be fanatical and zealous. They feel good only when they go whole hog on salvation.
    Take sci-fi nerds. Most like some decent novels and movies. But there are some lunatics who gotta watch everything and attend every sci-fi convention.

    Take someone like Mickey Rourke and Lindsey Lohan. They simply didn’t know when or how to say no. They had to debauch themselves totally. It was part of their extreme personality.

    And that seems to be the main root of why some people have to become hardcore neo-nazi, hardcore antifa/communist, hardcore neocon, hardcore homomaniacal, hardcore Islamist(like with ISIS) etc.
    And it’s why some people must go beyond sexual licentiousness. They feel a need to become strippers, prostitutes, or sex workers.

    So, it’s a personality defect. And yet, it is disingenuous for our society to condemn neo-nazis since extremism(especially of fringe or transgressive nature) has been promoted relentlessly and widely.
    EXTREME has been a brand in pop culture. Extreme games, extreme sports, extreme sex, extreme everything. How else did a fringe culture like homo stuff turn into homomania as the new religion? How did tattoos go from subculture to mainstream culture where you see entire families covered with that slime? Why are educated women making their hair blue or green? How did rap and twerking become part of what we are ‘proud’ of as Americans? How did mainstream culture become pornified? Why do parents let their kids grow up playing the most violent kinds of videogames?
    So, given the cultural mode of all-around extremism, why wouldn’t there be neo-nazis who are into extreme ideology? Ironically, even though Alt-Right is smeared as neo-nazi, it’s real sin is it is anti-extremist in a world of extremism as new normal. It seeks a balance of things with proper sex roles, sound borders, rule of law, respect for tradition, etc.

    The normalization of extremist tendencies has paralleled the normalization of what were once deemed vice industries run by gangsters and organized crime. Gambling is surely the biggest. A totally useless and parasitic industry, it has penetrated every state and every community. And no one is outraged and shocked anymore. And with the opiod crisis, we don’t know what is legal or illegal drug anymore. What is a fix and what is a ‘fix’. It’s like the media accusing Trump of being vulgar when the media and even academia have been promoting vulgarity all around. I mean the holiest expression of Americanism today is the ‘gay’ or ‘pride’ parade in celebration of bungholery.

    When extremist tendencies that were kept in the margins, fringes, or peripheries of societies are allowed to take center stage, then extremism is the ‘new moderation’, and that kind of formula simply cannot hold since extreme tendencies cannot last long as the main support system of an order. It’s like the world economy cannot go on with gangsterism as its ruling principle. It’s like Maoism as the ‘new normal’ of China eventually had to burn out. The current ‘new normal’ of America must also go.

    Read More
  173. Mulegino1 says:
    @peterAUS
    As I said:

    One can see a PhD material (intelligence, education, erudition…knowledge of certain facts) capable of such…..delusion…..that’s truly fascinating.
     
    Exploring that....trait/characteristic.....is interesting.

    I've seen that all over the board, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion.

    A lot of that against Jews, of course.

    I really admire that capability.

    "Jews are stupid"----"They rule the world"
    "US Empire is weak"----"US Empire destroys the world"
    "Western way of life is s&*t"----"We don't want any border control" (direction of travel is obvious).
    "THEIR military is weak"----"We must invest more in our military to defend against THEM".
    Etc...etc.....
    LONG list.

    Related to topic:
    China and Russia are the beacons of civilized world----They censor the free speech at least as West.

    And, true, for the author of the article, as a couple of commentators posted here, blatant censorship on own site.
    Let alone "Russia is so better than USA"----"I, with strong ethnic Russian roots, prefer living in USA".

    Oh, there is more.

    "We are so concerned about preserving free Internet, privacy there...blah...blah.."----"We have no clue how all that works in technical sense. And of course, it's just BOOOORIING learning that."

    Good fun.

    The “Jews” are not stupid and they do not rule the world. They are clever, in their social networking and collective indulgence with self-promotion, but individually, they are not all that. Their putative “genius” lies mostly with social networking and publicity hounding – not too difficult when they control the message and the media.

    Their international leadership, however, incarnates the spirit of Antichrist, so they have powerful allies in their metaphysical battles against all that is good, decent, innocent, truthful and beautiful. That is why they- as a collective – have never been good at architecture, music, the arts or industry. They are good at flim flam, superficial noise making, cheap publicity, and common crimes such as white slavery, pornography and the international drug trade.

    The very best of the Jews- the Bobby Fischers, the Gerard Menuhins, the Gilad Atzmons, the Israel Shahaks, the Brother Nathaniels, inter alia – are good because their common humanity eclipses their own tribal chauvinism.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    Well.........

    Re Jews.....maybe they are so successful because they exploit other peoples' weaknesses.
    As all social groups do, all the time......
    Maybe they are just better players.
    Maybe they are better players because they had it not easy...........

    Maybe the "Jew question" shouldn't be "how to defeat the spirit of Antichrist" (or any other derogatory expression about them), but "how come we are so weak"?

    I am fat...blame the food.
    I am ignorant...blame the educational system.
    I am physically weak...find any excuse imaginable.

    There is a ...gut feeling...........that blaming the Jew is just an excuse for own weaknesses.
    Not on personal level...people aware of the issue are O.K.
    But the same people blabbing about own race (say, whites about greatness of that race)?!
    Well...look around you.
    Facts...........
    And then blame the Jews for it.

    That's..........weak.

    Back to the topic of the article.

    Two elements.
    Web presence and accessing that presence.
    For Web presence, well....true...with tightening "hate laws" it will be more and more difficult to maintain it. Good thing is, more THEY stomp on it, more curious an average person will be. True, demographics is the important element, so, we'll see.......it can go both ways (just ask South African whites how it feels like...).
    For accessing that presence, no problem with elementary IT knowledge; actually, there are plenty of very good advice/procedures already documented on Internet how to do that.

    Just briefly, for true paranoids:
    Spare laptop. Non SSD hard drive. Clean OS (Windows 64 bit OS) install plus all the patches. Basic antivirus, updated. Virtualization software, say, Vmware Player. Again, clean OS Windows 64 bit OS install plus the patches. Any browser really, with the latest patches. Basic antivirus, updated.
    Now, the important part. Take the image of hard drive on usb hard drive. Eject.
    Get to the public WiFi...browse...whatever....enjoy the Internet.
    When finish, "destroy" the hard drive (plenty of utilities for that; Hiren boot disk has some of them, for example). Some laptops have proprietary software for that.
    Re image back from the backup. Get the updates.
    When finished go to the public WiFi..browse..whatever.....
    "Destroy"...reimage.....rinse and repeat.
    Simple.

    That will take care of all "non-targeted" tracking.

    For "targeted" tracking.....totally different game and way beyond the topic of the article.
    Water boarding part of that process...

    My 2 cents.

  174. peterAUS says:
    @Mulegino1
    The "Jews" are not stupid and they do not rule the world. They are clever, in their social networking and collective indulgence with self-promotion, but individually, they are not all that. Their putative "genius" lies mostly with social networking and publicity hounding - not too difficult when they control the message and the media.

    Their international leadership, however, incarnates the spirit of Antichrist, so they have powerful allies in their metaphysical battles against all that is good, decent, innocent, truthful and beautiful. That is why they- as a collective - have never been good at architecture, music, the arts or industry. They are good at flim flam, superficial noise making, cheap publicity, and common crimes such as white slavery, pornography and the international drug trade.

    The very best of the Jews- the Bobby Fischers, the Gerard Menuhins, the Gilad Atzmons, the Israel Shahaks, the Brother Nathaniels, inter alia - are good because their common humanity eclipses their own tribal chauvinism.

    Well………

    Re Jews…..maybe they are so successful because they exploit other peoples’ weaknesses.
    As all social groups do, all the time……
    Maybe they are just better players.
    Maybe they are better players because they had it not easy………..

    Maybe the “Jew question” shouldn’t be “how to defeat the spirit of Antichrist” (or any other derogatory expression about them), but “how come we are so weak”?

    I am fat…blame the food.
    I am ignorant…blame the educational system.
    I am physically weak…find any excuse imaginable.

    There is a …gut feeling………..that blaming the Jew is just an excuse for own weaknesses.
    Not on personal level…people aware of the issue are O.K.
    But the same people blabbing about own race (say, whites about greatness of that race)?!
    Well…look around you.
    Facts………..
    And then blame the Jews for it.

    That’s……….weak.

    Back to the topic of the article.

    Two elements.
    Web presence and accessing that presence.
    For Web presence, well….true…with tightening “hate laws” it will be more and more difficult to maintain it. Good thing is, more THEY stomp on it, more curious an average person will be. True, demographics is the important element, so, we’ll see…….it can go both ways (just ask South African whites how it feels like…).
    For accessing that presence, no problem with elementary IT knowledge; actually, there are plenty of very good advice/procedures already documented on Internet how to do that.

    Just briefly, for true paranoids:
    Spare laptop. Non SSD hard drive. Clean OS (Windows 64 bit OS) install plus all the patches. Basic antivirus, updated. Virtualization software, say, Vmware Player. Again, clean OS Windows 64 bit OS install plus the patches. Any browser really, with the latest patches. Basic antivirus, updated.
    Now, the important part. Take the image of hard drive on usb hard drive. Eject.
    Get to the public WiFi…browse…whatever….enjoy the Internet.
    When finish, “destroy” the hard drive (plenty of utilities for that; Hiren boot disk has some of them, for example). Some laptops have proprietary software for that.
    Re image back from the backup. Get the updates.
    When finished go to the public WiFi..browse..whatever…..
    “Destroy”…reimage…..rinse and repeat.
    Simple.

    That will take care of all “non-targeted” tracking.

    For “targeted” tracking…..totally different game and way beyond the topic of the article.
    Water boarding part of that process…

    My 2 cents.

    Read More
  175. @iffen
    among other things: no unemployment, no homelessness

    Strictly speaking, I guess a home and job in the Gulag would qualify; job and home being subjective ideas.

    I guess a home and job in the Gulag would qualify

    See, this is what meant by ‘unconsciously accepting basic assumptions’, cultural myths. ‘GULAG’ was (till late 1950s, when it disappeared) the Soviet equivalent of American ‘BOP’ (the Bureau of Prisons).

    If you watch 1967 film Cool Hand Luke, you might, perhaps, find it even more damning than One Day of Ivan Denisovich, and yet the word ‘BOP’ has no cultural significance, produces no emotional response. There’s been no massive decades-long campaign to popularize and mythologize the evils of any western prison system. Not because they were so much better, but simply because there’s no reason to do it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    See, this is what meant by ‘unconsciously accepting basic assumptions’, cultural myths.

    So how is it that you were able to escape this while the rest of us were brought low? Or is that a trade secret?



    Captain: What we've got here is failure to communicate.
     
  176. @Beefcake the Mighty
    I see the old myth about Lebensraum and Mein Kampf is being trotted out (along with the good ol' Generalplan Ost boogeyman).

    You asked for proof and you got it. Closed minds admit no light or understanding.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
    I asked for proof that the Germans had a plan to exterminate (mass-kill) Slavs in an occupied post-war East, not whether the demographic outcome for Slavs would have been grim after a German victory. No such proof is forthcoming here, because there is NO evidence for such a claim (any more than there is evidence of a German plan to exterminate the Jews). Fair point that the Germans may indeed have been influenced by American treatment of Indians in their expansion westward.

    I mention Lebensraum because there is this complete misconception that Hitler was referring (before he became German leader, BTW) to plans for future conquest of the East. In fact he was referring to the instability of the post-revolution SU and its likelihood for collapse (the leadership being dominated by Jews, Hitler regarded its ability to lead long term as low), leading to opportunities for German expansion. He was hardly alone in thinking of these things in Germany after the First World War. The point is, it had nothing to do with the decision to attack the SU in 1941, since Stalin's regime was in no danger of collapse, and Barbarossa was hardly evidence of German designs for conquest.
  177. @simplyamazed
    You asked for proof and you got it. Closed minds admit no light or understanding.

    I asked for proof that the Germans had a plan to exterminate (mass-kill) Slavs in an occupied post-war East, not whether the demographic outcome for Slavs would have been grim after a German victory. No such proof is forthcoming here, because there is NO evidence for such a claim (any more than there is evidence of a German plan to exterminate the Jews). Fair point that the Germans may indeed have been influenced by American treatment of Indians in their expansion westward.

    I mention Lebensraum because there is this complete misconception that Hitler was referring (before he became German leader, BTW) to plans for future conquest of the East. In fact he was referring to the instability of the post-revolution SU and its likelihood for collapse (the leadership being dominated by Jews, Hitler regarded its ability to lead long term as low), leading to opportunities for German expansion. He was hardly alone in thinking of these things in Germany after the First World War. The point is, it had nothing to do with the decision to attack the SU in 1941, since Stalin’s regime was in no danger of collapse, and Barbarossa was hardly evidence of German designs for conquest.

    Read More
    • Replies: @simplyamazed
    Perhaps you missed my quote from Mein Kampf above in which Hitler laid out his view that German future lay in occupying the Russian lands. I repeat it here:

    Writing in, Mein Kampf (My Struggle), in 1924, Hitler declared,

    “We National Socialists consciously draw a line through the foreign policy trend of our pre-War period. We take up at the halting place of six hundred years ago. We terminate the endless German drive to the south and west of Europe, and turn our gaze toward the lands in the east. We finally terminate the colonial and trade policy of the pre-War period and proceed to the territorial policy of the future … if we talk about new soil and territory in Europe today, we can think primarily only of Russia and its vassal border states.”

    How was this understood upon implementation of Operation Barbarossa? Here are two quotes with references:

    Words of Colonel-General Hoepner, commander of Panzer Group 4 in the invasion of the Soviet Union on sending his troops into battle, As quoted in Omar, Bartov, Hitler's Army: Soldiers, Nazis and War in the Third Reich, New York, Oxford University Press, 1992, p.129.

    "The war against the Soviet Union is an essential component of the German people's struggle for existence. It is the old struggle of the Germans against the Slavs, the defense of European culture against the Muscovite-Asiatic flood, the warding off of Jewish Bolshevism. This struggle must have as its aim the demolition of present Russia and must therefore be conducted with unprecedented severity. Both the planning and execution of every battle must be dictated by an iron will to bring about a merciless, total annihilation of the enemy."

    Words of Einsatzgruppe cheif, Franz Alfred Six, As quoted by Alex J. Kay. The Purpose of the Russian Campaign is the Decimation of the Slavic Population by Thirty Million", The Radicalization of German Food Policy in Early 1941, in Alex J. Kay, Jeff Rutherford and David Stahel, eds., Nazi Policy on the Eastern Front, 1941: Total War, Genocide, and Radicalization, Rochester, NY. University of Rochester Press, 2012, p.113

    "Hitler intends to extend the eastern border of the Reich as far as the line Baku-Stalingrad-Moscow-Leningrad. Eastward of this line as far as the Urals, a "blazing strip" will emerge in which all life is to be erased. It is intended to decimate (i.e. exterminate) the around thirty million Russians living in this strip through starvation, by removing all foodstuffs from this enormous territory. All those involved in this operation are to be forbidden on pain of death to give a Russian even a piece of bread. The large cities from Leningrad to Moscow are to be razed to the ground..."

    The policies of decimation and starvation were outlined in directives prior to the start of Operation. Barbarossa. Himmler is quoted as stating at a dinner party shortly before the invasion of Russia that, "The purpose of the Russian campaign is to decimate the Slavic population by thirty millions."
  178. Barbie says:

    What’s the difference between Nazis and zionists?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    What’s the difference between Nazis and zionists?
     
    the Nazis were telling hostile foreigners to leave ancient German lands

    the Zionists are telling the Palestinians to leave ancient Palestinian lands

    its the difference between telling an obnoxious guest to leave your house

    vs.

    going to someone else's house and telling them to get out, you're stealing their house

    http://www.palestinephotoproject.org/

    https://photos.smugmug.com/Gallery-Folder/City-Life/i-g5FsWKL/0/f405c931/X2/Aircraft%20Hanno%2C%20Imperial%20Airways%2C%20Gaza%2C%20ca.%201935-13615u-X2.jpg
  179. Anon says: • Disclaimer
    @Mulegino1
    What is your definition of a "swell guy", incidentally? Yeah, the "Nazis" may have shot a few of them here or there, but "tu quoque" is also a basis for the concept of reciprocity. Just what crime can you realistically accuse the National Socialists of that the Allies-whether Anglo-American or Soviet- did not commit in far greater orders of magnitude? It is quite evident that the greatest crime of Hitler and the Reich was losing the war.

    How about forced euthanasia?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    Forced euthanasia was wrong from a moral standpoint, which is why the leaders of the Christian Churches in Germany protested vehemently against it from the pulpit. Nobody says that the National Socialists were saints or boy scouts, only that the allegations against them were grossly exaggerated. If innocent people were killed in the anti-partisan operations, then that was also morally wrong, but not against the laws governing land warfare at the time.

    Abortion on demand is also morally wrong but it is celebrated as a human right in the west today. The indiscriminate slaughter of civilians by area bombing, a policy instituted by the British and not the Germans, was morally wrong as well.

    There is no mystery to me why the National Socialists are portrayed as the ultimate evil:

    It is because:

    A: They lost the war.

    B: The victorious Allies needed to deflect from their own horrendous crimes (which dwarfed those of the Germans, probably by orders of magnitude) so they had to demonize their defeated adversaries.

    C: The burgeoning Military Industrial Complex in the west, headed by Atlanticist Zionist NATO, needed a raison d'etre for its continued existence and bullying hegemony, so it had to create the idiotic notion of the "Good War" , allegedly fought for (it now sounds comical) things like the "Four Freedoms" and the "Atlantic Charter." The latter document is a sick joke, claiming that the US and Great Britain sought no territorial expansions. Why would they, when, between them, they controlled nearly one third of the world's land surface at the time?

    D: The creation of the Judenstaat required that the Jews become the innocent victims of the "Greatest Crime in history", so their "moral victimhood" would both enable and justify their seizure of others' land and the brutalization of the Palestinian Christians and Muslims.
  180. iffen says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    I guess a home and job in the Gulag would qualify
     
    See, this is what meant by 'unconsciously accepting basic assumptions', cultural myths. 'GULAG' was (till late 1950s, when it disappeared) the Soviet equivalent of American 'BOP' (the Bureau of Prisons).

    If you watch 1967 film Cool Hand Luke, you might, perhaps, find it even more damning than One Day of Ivan Denisovich, and yet the word 'BOP' has no cultural significance, produces no emotional response. There's been no massive decades-long campaign to popularize and mythologize the evils of any western prison system. Not because they were so much better, but simply because there's no reason to do it.

    See, this is what meant by ‘unconsciously accepting basic assumptions’, cultural myths.

    So how is it that you were able to escape this while the rest of us were brought low? Or is that a trade secret?

    Captain: What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji
    Nah, I'm the same as you. With slightly different assumptions.
  181. Rurik says: • Website
    @Avery
    We have been thru this many times before in many threads.

    Nazis had in mind to exterminate every Slav West of the Urals.
    Every last Slav who was 'useless', and to work the able-bodied to death serving the alleged Master Race.
    If Hitler had satisfied himself with Sudetenland, Germany today would not be a Globalist/Neocon occupied country today, completely neutered, and having sunk so low that their so-called leaders produce PSAs whoring their young German women to Islamist "rapefugees".
    Disgusting.

    As to Bolsheviks/Soviets:

    Hitler and Nazis were totally defeated by Bolsheviks/Communists/Soviets.
    The Read Army did enter Berlin.
    Communists/Soviets did occupy Eastern Europe.
    Life was hard.
    There was political repression.
    But nobody was exterminated because they were Polish, or Hungarian, or......

    In fact, an unintended side-benefit of Soviet occupation was that Eastern Europeans were not corrupted by the Globalist virus, and thus remained Polish, Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks,....
    Only Eastern Europeans in Europe have maintained their nationality, traditions, and Christianity.

    Russia today is a defender of Orthodox Christianity.
    After 70 years of Communist/Soviet misrule, Soviet people themselves rejected Bolshevism/Communism, and solved their problems without Hitler's "help".
    Russia today is slowly, but relentlessly reverting to its ethno-Russian, Orthodox Christian roots and traditions. While decadent Western Europe is rapidly sinking into a putrid swamp.

    Tell me if a march like this could take place in any Western European country today.
    [Poland to Muslims: " Here, Jesus is our King so get out "]
    http://www.unz.com/tsaker/first-they-came-for-the-nazis-and-pedophiles/#comment-1991224

    But nobody was exterminated because they were Polish, or Hungarian, or……

    tell that to the people at Katyn, or Bela Kun’s victims, or the Kulaks…

    how many of those thousands of Polish officers and priests and professors and authors and poets and others who had their hands tied behind their backs and forced to stand at the edge of a ditch while a NKVD orc but a bullet in their brain, were Jewish? Eh? The only Jews at katyn were wearing NKVD officer uniforms.

    Bolshevism was a genocidal agenda to slaughter the best of the Gentiles (where have we heard that before) and then enslave the remaining masses.

    it is written

    I’ve never been a fan of the Nazis. I think they were arrogant and full of racial hubris. But when I see what’s happening today, as the world’s Jews are hell bent on destroying Western civilization and its people, and heaping scorn on our heritage and demonizing our very phenotype as evil…

    I start to wonder if perhaps the Nazis had no choice but to fight those Bolsheviks, or risk coming under their genocidal fist of hatred.

    If you had a choice to be a Palestinian today, and see your loved ones humiliated and murdered and their property stolen by their worst enemies…

    or fight them. Which would you do?

    Everything I have ever heard from the PTB about the Palestinians since I’ve been alive, has been sinister lies that blame the victim, while giving a pass to the murderers and criminals (indeed, making the genocidal murderers out to be the victims!). Why should I think the ((PTB)) are going to be any more fair to the Nazis as they make their billionth movie and write their trillionth lie?

    were the Nazis racial supremacists and capable of murder? I suppose so, and for that I revile them. But were their enemies a thousand times worse? It sure seems like that to me.

    How different were the Nazis at their rallies from the Poles in that video Avery?

    Nationalistic and racially proud- demanding their unwillingness to let International Jewry destroy their nation – like it did in the last century.

    whether their rallying cry is religious or racial. The only thing missing from that video of the Polish march and rally is roman salutes.

    Read More
    • Troll: Cyrano
    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
    "... wonder if the Nazis had no choice but to fight those Bolsheviks."

    Hey Rurik,

    Your quote above is good inquiry.

    Author Viktor Suvorov's book "The Chief Culprit" broadens
    , @Anon
    People at Katyn, etc. were not murdered because of their race*. Stalin was not kind to the Jewish intelligentsia either-- haven't you been reading Karlin's threads?

    People at rallies are not that different from each other-- it's what they do AFTER the rallies that counts.

    You don't like the "Red Hordes" invading Europe? Then give a big hand to the one man who made it all possible-- Adolf Hitler, everybody!

    You like defending Europe? The Poles actually did defend Europe (and Germany) from those Red Hordes-- what gratitude did they get? They got their country destroyed over (if you believe the Nazi apologists) one lousy city. Sheesh. Hitler should have GIVEN them Danzig, with his personal and heartfelt thanks.

    *Some Chechens were, that's another story.
  182. @Beefcake the Mighty
    I asked for proof that the Germans had a plan to exterminate (mass-kill) Slavs in an occupied post-war East, not whether the demographic outcome for Slavs would have been grim after a German victory. No such proof is forthcoming here, because there is NO evidence for such a claim (any more than there is evidence of a German plan to exterminate the Jews). Fair point that the Germans may indeed have been influenced by American treatment of Indians in their expansion westward.

    I mention Lebensraum because there is this complete misconception that Hitler was referring (before he became German leader, BTW) to plans for future conquest of the East. In fact he was referring to the instability of the post-revolution SU and its likelihood for collapse (the leadership being dominated by Jews, Hitler regarded its ability to lead long term as low), leading to opportunities for German expansion. He was hardly alone in thinking of these things in Germany after the First World War. The point is, it had nothing to do with the decision to attack the SU in 1941, since Stalin's regime was in no danger of collapse, and Barbarossa was hardly evidence of German designs for conquest.

    Perhaps you missed my quote from Mein Kampf above in which Hitler laid out his view that German future lay in occupying the Russian lands. I repeat it here:

    Writing in, Mein Kampf (My Struggle), in 1924, Hitler declared,

    “We National Socialists consciously draw a line through the foreign policy trend of our pre-War period. We take up at the halting place of six hundred years ago. We terminate the endless German drive to the south and west of Europe, and turn our gaze toward the lands in the east. We finally terminate the colonial and trade policy of the pre-War period and proceed to the territorial policy of the future … if we talk about new soil and territory in Europe today, we can think primarily only of Russia and its vassal border states.”

    How was this understood upon implementation of Operation Barbarossa? Here are two quotes with references:

    Words of Colonel-General Hoepner, commander of Panzer Group 4 in the invasion of the Soviet Union on sending his troops into battle, As quoted in Omar, Bartov, Hitler’s Army: Soldiers, Nazis and War in the Third Reich, New York, Oxford University Press, 1992, p.129.

    “The war against the Soviet Union is an essential component of the German people’s struggle for existence. It is the old struggle of the Germans against the Slavs, the defense of European culture against the Muscovite-Asiatic flood, the warding off of Jewish Bolshevism. This struggle must have as its aim the demolition of present Russia and must therefore be conducted with unprecedented severity. Both the planning and execution of every battle must be dictated by an iron will to bring about a merciless, total annihilation of the enemy.”

    Words of Einsatzgruppe cheif, Franz Alfred Six, As quoted by Alex J. Kay. The Purpose of the Russian Campaign is the Decimation of the Slavic Population by Thirty Million”, The Radicalization of German Food Policy in Early 1941, in Alex J. Kay, Jeff Rutherford and David Stahel, eds., Nazi Policy on the Eastern Front, 1941: Total War, Genocide, and Radicalization, Rochester, NY. University of Rochester Press, 2012, p.113

    “Hitler intends to extend the eastern border of the Reich as far as the line Baku-Stalingrad-Moscow-Leningrad. Eastward of this line as far as the Urals, a “blazing strip” will emerge in which all life is to be erased. It is intended to decimate (i.e. exterminate) the around thirty million Russians living in this strip through starvation, by removing all foodstuffs from this enormous territory. All those involved in this operation are to be forbidden on pain of death to give a Russian even a piece of bread. The large cities from Leningrad to Moscow are to be razed to the ground…”

    The policies of decimation and starvation were outlined in directives prior to the start of Operation. Barbarossa. Himmler is quoted as stating at a dinner party shortly before the invasion of Russia that, “The purpose of the Russian campaign is to decimate the Slavic population by thirty millions.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Thales the Milesian
    I hope the Swidomite scum from wojewodstwo Lwow and their immigrants to North America will read this.

    Disgusting helots!
    , @Beefcake the Mighty
    A dinner party? Really? What was served?
  183. Rurik says: • Website
    @Barbie
    What's the difference between Nazis and zionists?

    What’s the difference between Nazis and zionists?

    the Nazis were telling hostile foreigners to leave ancient German lands

    the Zionists are telling the Palestinians to leave ancient Palestinian lands

    its the difference between telling an obnoxious guest to leave your house

    vs.

    going to someone else’s house and telling them to get out, you’re stealing their house

    http://www.palestinephotoproject.org/

    Read More
  184. @iffen
    See, this is what meant by ‘unconsciously accepting basic assumptions’, cultural myths.

    So how is it that you were able to escape this while the rest of us were brought low? Or is that a trade secret?



    Captain: What we've got here is failure to communicate.
     

    Nah, I’m the same as you. With slightly different assumptions.

    Read More
  185. Cyrano says:
    @iffen
    among other things: no unemployment, no homelessness

    Strictly speaking, I guess a home and job in the Gulag would qualify; job and home being subjective ideas.

    You are so witty that they should put you in a witless protection program.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Don't you need to get back to arguing with Polacks and Ukrainians over who has the longest pecker?
  186. iffen says:
    @Cyrano
    You are so witty that they should put you in a witless protection program.

    Don’t you need to get back to arguing with Polacks and Ukrainians over who has the longest pecker?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cyrano
    No, we need an independent observer to anal-ize the competition – if you catch my drift.
  187. @simplyamazed
    Perhaps you missed my quote from Mein Kampf above in which Hitler laid out his view that German future lay in occupying the Russian lands. I repeat it here:

    Writing in, Mein Kampf (My Struggle), in 1924, Hitler declared,

    “We National Socialists consciously draw a line through the foreign policy trend of our pre-War period. We take up at the halting place of six hundred years ago. We terminate the endless German drive to the south and west of Europe, and turn our gaze toward the lands in the east. We finally terminate the colonial and trade policy of the pre-War period and proceed to the territorial policy of the future … if we talk about new soil and territory in Europe today, we can think primarily only of Russia and its vassal border states.”

    How was this understood upon implementation of Operation Barbarossa? Here are two quotes with references:

    Words of Colonel-General Hoepner, commander of Panzer Group 4 in the invasion of the Soviet Union on sending his troops into battle, As quoted in Omar, Bartov, Hitler's Army: Soldiers, Nazis and War in the Third Reich, New York, Oxford University Press, 1992, p.129.

    "The war against the Soviet Union is an essential component of the German people's struggle for existence. It is the old struggle of the Germans against the Slavs, the defense of European culture against the Muscovite-Asiatic flood, the warding off of Jewish Bolshevism. This struggle must have as its aim the demolition of present Russia and must therefore be conducted with unprecedented severity. Both the planning and execution of every battle must be dictated by an iron will to bring about a merciless, total annihilation of the enemy."

    Words of Einsatzgruppe cheif, Franz Alfred Six, As quoted by Alex J. Kay. The Purpose of the Russian Campaign is the Decimation of the Slavic Population by Thirty Million", The Radicalization of German Food Policy in Early 1941, in Alex J. Kay, Jeff Rutherford and David Stahel, eds., Nazi Policy on the Eastern Front, 1941: Total War, Genocide, and Radicalization, Rochester, NY. University of Rochester Press, 2012, p.113

    "Hitler intends to extend the eastern border of the Reich as far as the line Baku-Stalingrad-Moscow-Leningrad. Eastward of this line as far as the Urals, a "blazing strip" will emerge in which all life is to be erased. It is intended to decimate (i.e. exterminate) the around thirty million Russians living in this strip through starvation, by removing all foodstuffs from this enormous territory. All those involved in this operation are to be forbidden on pain of death to give a Russian even a piece of bread. The large cities from Leningrad to Moscow are to be razed to the ground..."

    The policies of decimation and starvation were outlined in directives prior to the start of Operation. Barbarossa. Himmler is quoted as stating at a dinner party shortly before the invasion of Russia that, "The purpose of the Russian campaign is to decimate the Slavic population by thirty millions."

    I hope the Swidomite scum from wojewodstwo Lwow and their immigrants to North America will read this.

    Disgusting helots!

    Read More
  188. Wally says:
    @Anon
    Good source there. Couldn't find your copy of The Late Great Planet Earth?

    You stand refuted, Zionist.

    Read More