The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewThe Saker Archive
A Crash Course on the True Causes of “Anti-Semitism”, Part II
The hunt for anti-Semites
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_1035753562

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

First, anti-Semites everywhere!

It has been over a year since I wrote an article entitled “A Crash Course on the True Causes of “Anti-Semitism.” I tried to illustrate how the kind of ideology and worldview of what ought to be called Rabbinical Phariseeism but is, alas, usually referred to as “Orthodox Judaism,” results in an inevitable hostile backlash from those whom this ideology and worldview even deny the status of “human being.” Today, I want to do something a little different: look at a political tactic which appears to give Jews a very desirable position but which in reality places them all at risk: the use of the accusation of “anti-Semitism” on practically anybody who dares to be critical of anybody and anything Jewish. The following recent headline on RT was what inspired me to discuss this issue:

Trump accused of anti-Semitism over claim Soros funds ‘elevator screamers.’

I won’t take up space here by quoting the article at length so please check it out on the original RT page. Here is just a short excerpt:

Critics of US President Donald Trump were quick to accuse him of anti-Semitism over a tweet claiming that women accosting senators over Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh were paid by liberal billionaire George Soros. “The very rude elevator screamers are paid professionals only looking to make Senators look bad. Don’t fall for it!” Trump tweeted on Friday. “Also, look at all of the professionally made identical signs. Paid for by Soros and others. These are not signs made in the basement from love!” Outrage ensued, obviously. ThinkProgress, the media arm of John Podesta’s Center for American Progress think tank, immediately accused the president of anti-Semitism. A Slate editor chimed in, calling Trump’s words an “anti-Semitic dog whistle.” And a staff writer for The Atlantic called it a “conspiracy theory that a rich Jewish boogeyman is making women claim to have been raped and assaulted.

I have no idea why the RT reporter wrote that outrage ensued “obviously,” but let’s first note that none of those who accuse Trump of anti-Semitism makes any effort to explain why exactly Trump’s words are anti-Semitic.

I know, “anti-Semitism” is a misleading and basically meaningless notion. In this article “What is Antisemitism” Michael Neumann how this already ambiguous and misleading concept became fundamentally meaningless (he concluded his analysis by saying “the real scandal today is not antisemitism but the importance it is given”). I will be using this term only because it is so widely used by Jewish organizations to discredit pretty much all those who dare to express a critical thought.

Think Progress simply tweeted this: “Trump tweets out anti-Semitic conspiracy theory about George Soros.” Here we have a classical double-whammy: anti-Semitism, of course, but also a “conspiracy theory.” We will come back to this conceptual pair.

But first, the basics.

Is there any doubt at all that Soros sponsors all kind of protests in many different countries including the USA?

Let’s check the hyper-politically correct and doubleplusgoodthinking Wikipedia and see what we find there. In the 6th paragraph of the introduction to Soros’ entry, we see the following sentence:

“Soros is a well-known supporter of American progressive and American liberal political causes, to which he dispenses donations through his foundation, the Open Society Foundations.”

Really?! Not only does Wikipedia unambiguously state that Soros is sponsoring various US progressive and liberal causes, but he has also even created a special foundation to do that. Does this entry mean that Wikipedia is also part of an anti-Semitic campaign and is spreading conspiracy theories? Did Trump not say precisely the same thing as Wikipedia when he tweeted about “screamers are paid professionals” and “professionally made identical signs? Paid for by Soros and others”? It sure looks to me that Trump and Wikipedia are saying the exact same thing, yet one gets accused of being anti-Semitic while the other is left in peace. Why? Besides, what Trump said is really something which is common knowledge and which is not even denied by Soros himself. Even better, the “elevator screamers” themselves don’t even deny it either.

And yet, in spite of that, the Daily Beast says that “Trump goes full conspiracy nut” while the Deputy Washington Editor of The New York Times, Jonathan Weisman tweeted that “I’m sorry but the “Soros is paying them” trope from the president of the United States is … wow” and then proceeded to plug his book (((Semitism))) Being Jewish in American in the Age of Trump. That book was enthusiastically endorsed by The Washington Post: (“a passionate call to arms”), the Jewish Book Council: (“Could not be more important or timely”) and the inevitable Bernard-Henri Lévy: (“It would be wonderful if anti-Semitism was a European specialty and stopped at the border with the United States. Alas, this is not the case”).

Wait!

How do you go from “professional elevator screamers” to anti-Semitism?!

Trump says something which is both undeniable and actually undenied, and that somehow makes him a conspiracy nut and an anti-Semite and that, in turn, is supposed to suggest to us that Jews are in great peril in the USA (“call to arms” + “could not be more important”).

Does that make any sense to you at all?!

Trump is accused of being an anti-Semite because he had the nerve to actually openly state an undisputed fact. More specifically, Trump is guilty not just of stating an undisputed fact, but of stating an undisputed fact in reference to a Jew (hence the specific accusation of anti-Semitism and not of some other form of crimethink). But since Wikipedia and Soros himself pretty much say the same thing as Trump, albeit in a more educated way, what is the problem?

Setting aside the fact that Trump has proven to be the best shabbos-goy the Likud ever had (just his move of the US embassy to occupied Jerusalem was an act of truly abject servility to Israel), let’s deconstruct what is really going on here.

ORDER IT NOW

I submit that for all the official propaganda, everybody knows that free speech in the AngloZionist Empire is strictly limited: in the European colonies by means of fines and incarceration and in the USA by means of political hysterics. The methods are different (no First Amendment in Europe!) but the goal is the same: to smear, discredit and eventually silence the crimethinkers.

Let us look at two examples:

Next, anti-anti-Semites everywhere

First, check out this article about “conspiracy theories” in which the author writes: (emphasis added)

The term “conspiracy theory” is used to describe any theory that attempts to characterize observed events as the result of some secret conspiracy. The term is often used dismissively, implying that the theory is implausible. Although conspiracy theories (particularly aimed at Jews and Bankers) date back hundreds of years, the earliest usage of “conspiracy theory” does not always have this connotation, although the theories are quite often dismissed in other ways. Usually, it’s simply a way of identifying the theory from other theories – as in “the theory that happens to have a conspiracy.”

Therefore, since discussing Jews and Bankers is a typical “conspiracy theory” and since the term “conspiracy theory” is often used dismissively, implying that it is implausible, it is therefore implausible that Jews and bankers would have any special political or historical importance. But if this is so implausible, why are such theories particularly aimed at Jews and bankers and not at Buddhists and bakers? Where is the logic here?

The second example is from an article entitled “Holocaust denial and 9/11 “Truth”: Two crappy tastes that taste crappy together” which clearly states: (emphasis added)

Holocaust denial fits into the 9/11 “Truth” movement hand-in-glove. Think about it. Whenever you see claims by 9/11 Truthers that there was some sort of “conspiracy” to bring down the World Trade Center towers, who is inevitably part of the conspiracy in the paranoid vision of the “Truth” movement? Well, there’s usually the U.S. government, but almost invariably the Mossad is said to be involved. Yep, the Jews.

This is interesting. Let’s assume that 9/11 truthers mostly think that Israel was involved in the 9/11 false flag (I certainly believe that!), how does that in any way imply that “the Jews” did something wrong or, even more so, the denial of the so-called “Holocaust”?! Furthermore, how does reaching the basic and inevitable conclusions implied by high-school level Newtonian physics about WTC 7 in any way indicate that somebody is paranoid? Maybe the label of “paranoid” ought to be applied to everybody not trusting the government?

Would it not be much more fitting to apply the term “paranoid” to those who manage to jump from “paid elevator screamers” to anti-Semitism or from doubts about 9/11 to Holocaust denial? I think that the paranoid nutcases are the anti-anti-Semites who are constantly doing two very dangerous things:

1) strenuously denying obvious and well-known facts

2) accusing anybody capable of critical thought of being an anti-Semite

Make no mistake, those still capable of critical thought will challenge the official narratives about 9/11 or about the “Holocaust”. I would even argue that any good and interesting history book will always be revisionist, at least to some degree. Good historiography should always challenge widely accepted beliefs, should it not?

In a mentally sane and politically free society challenges to the official 9/11 conspiracy theory (because, make no mistake, the official fairy tale about 9/11 is quite literally a “conspiracy theory” and a most unlikely and most implausible one!) or to the official narrative about the “Holocaust” should be treated just like the “no moon landing” or “flat earth” or any other theory which should be discussed on its merits and not treated as a form of egregious and evil crimethink. Alas, as we all know, this is far from being the case today.

Personally, I don’t blame “the Jews” for this state of affairs, if only because I don’t even use a category like “the Jews” which I consider to be meaningless. However, I do lay the blame for this situation on organized Jewry; that is, the main Jewish/Zionist organizations who by their constant efforts to place such utterly ridiculous limits on free speech (and even free thought!) create a world in which two main camps struggle against each other:

  • First, the doubleplusgoodthinkers who are fully zombified by the mass media and who have fully internalized all the characteristics of the doublethink Orwell described in his book 1984: these brainwashed zombies can fully accept and believe two mutually contradictory things with no cognitive dissonance whatsoever.
  • Second, the crimethinkers who dare to doubt the official views about any topic and who, once they realize that they have been lied to about almost anything which matters, distrust and even challenge those ideas which are the most widely and systematically propagandized.

Of course, this state of affairs is bad for non-Jews, but it is even much worse for Jews because it creates an extremely dangerous mechanism: by rabidly enforcing such outrageous limits on free speech, Jewish organizations are profoundly alienating all those capable of independent thought. Even worse, once they start doubting one thing, e.g., the official narrative about 9/11, they inevitably wonder if they have been lied to in another matter, e.g., the “Holocaust.” In fact, what this pressure to conform to the official doxa of the day, the Zeitgeist if you wish, results in, is what I would call a “chain reaction of doubts,” including very unreasonable doubts. Let me give just one example:

After having read many books and articles about this topic, I find it extremely unlikely that the Nazis used gas chambers or crematoria in any large numbers. I would never presume to say that this “never” happened, but I personally don’t believe that this happened in any large numbers (this is why I consider the word “Holocaust,” which means “all/whole-burning,” a very misleading term). I also believe that the (quasi-obligatory) figure of 6 million is a vast exaggeration. Why? Because I read a lot about it, from both sides, and, frankly, the “revisionists” have much stronger arguments, both factual and logical.

However,

There is also no doubt in my mind at all that the Nazis were genocidal maniacs and self-worshiping racists who butchered millions of totally innocent people, including a very large number of Jews. I just believe that most of their victims were either murdered by the SS Einsatzgruppen or starved to death in various concentration camps (including many smaller, lesser known ones). Is that really less evil than using gas chambers or crematoria? I sure don’t think so. Neither do I think that four, three, two or even “just” one million murdered innocent is much better than six million. I know that there are many others out there who came to similar conclusions. But the problem is that there are also those who, once they began having doubts about gas chambers or crematoria, then decided the entire narrative about the “Holocaust” was one big lie and that no Jews at all were targeted or murdered by the Nazis.

My personal observation is that the vast majority of those who come to such a (completely unwarranted) conclusions are, indeed, Jew-hating folks who want to whitewash the Nazis and who would gladly parrot any inanity as long as it is somehow anti-Jewish or pro-Nazi. Not very smart, for sure, but it is nonetheless true that their hostility towards anything Jewish or their sympathies for the Nazis did not come out of nowhere but are a reaction to what they feel is the toxic and oppressive power of “the Jews” over their countries or society. Replace the “the Jews” with “Jewish and Zionist political organizations,” and they have a point, don’t they? One quick but honest look at US or French politics will immediately and easily confirm this.

Conclusion: anti-Semitism is something artificially kept alive

It seems to me that Jewish/Zionist organizations are apparently dead-set on creating as many enemies as possible or, at least, to alienate as many thinking people as possible. I can see how a rabid Zionist would find such a situation helpful for the Aliyah, but is it really good for the Jewish people? I very much doubt it.

The same goes for the mindset which makes any criticism of Soros or of Jewish bankers into a manifestation of anti-Semitism? Again, great for the Aliyah I suppose, but it is good for regular Jewish people? What about applying the label of “nutcase” to all those who dare to question an official theory? In the bad old days of the Soviet Union quite a few “dissidents” were declared suffering from “slowly-progressing schizophrenia” (вялотекущая шизофрения) by “official” psychiatrists and the “free and democratic world” was outraged (in spite of the fact that quite a few of these dissidents truly were suffering from mental issues). Is that profoundly different from placing the label of “nutcase” on somebody expressing doubts about an official theory?

What Jewish/Zionist organizations are trying to impose on the rest of the planet is a blanket immunity from any criticism for all Jews (except the “self-hating” ones, of course!) combined with a grim determination to crush anybody daring to oppose such plans.

The chances that most of the world will ever accept such mental shackles are virtually nil. What is much more likely is that the resistance to such efforts will grow, no doubt reported to the public as an “emergence of a new anti-Semitism” or something equally vapid. And at the end of the road, there will always be a powerful backlash against those who started it all. So what is the point?

I am left wondering whether all these Jewish/Zionist organizations are staffed merely by incompetent people, or whether creating more, not less, anti-Semitism might not be the real goal of these organizations.

Whatever may be the case, anti-Semitism is not something which “just exists.” It is something which must be rekindled over and over again. Left alone, it would just fizzle out.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Media, Anti-Semitism, Jews 
Hide 183 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Many ‘conspiracy theorists’ are really Conspiracy Realists.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @M Radant
  2. Biff says:

    I find it extremely unlikely that the Nazis used gas chambers or crematoria in any large numbers.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Death:_The_Rise_and_Fall_of_Fred_A._Leuchter,_Jr.

    • Replies: @Patricus
  3. I think that the paranoid nutcases are the anti-anti-Semites

    I think I would be paranoid if my community had embarked last century on a madcap scheme to undermine white Christian nations through mass immigration, only to find that a new means of communication, the Internet, was alerting those nations to my community’s leadership of the scheme.

    Douglas Murray wrote in 2015, ‘When the European migration crisis reached its latest peak earlier this year, a Jewish friend said to me: “This will come round to hurt the Jews—you’ll see.” At the time, I dismissed it. “The only group this might affect are Muslims,” I replied. He knew better. “You’ll see,” he warned. And now I have.’

    Murray concludes: ‘…it could yet be a problem for European Jews if their leaders and visible figures get ahead of (and are seen to be the progenitors of) a mass movement of peoples that looks likely in the near future to go unimaginably sour, thus bearing out my pessimistic Jewish friend’s worst fears.’

    • Replies: @romar
  4. When I was 18 or 25 or even 30 years old I felt no animosity toward Jewish people. But I feel so alienated by them and their relentless, reckless cries of anti-Semite that when the world finally turns on them in a decade or two I won’t be taking any Anne Franks in. I will say, “Your people have been so hard on my people that you can go find another attic to live in.” I tell you, the good ones, like Ron, really need to reel them in, and soon.

  5. romar says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    Interesting. So, then, the current worst enemy of the Jews is old Soros?
    in which case, why is he allowed to continue?

  6. Giuseppe says:

    Of course, this state of affairs is bad for non-Jews, but it is even much worse for Jews because it creates an extremely dangerous mechanism: by rabidly enforcing such outrageous limits on free speech, Jewish organizations are profoundly alienating all those capable of independent thought.

    Yes, I am feeling very alienated right now, as someone by culture and upbringing was disposed to appreciate the Jews. I first noticed with surprise a few years ago that the National Review began to label use of *neoconservative* as anti-Semitic, even though the particular use of the term was not directed at Jews or Jewish organizations, only at militarism in US foreign policy. Once an acquaintance accused me of anti-Semitism when I criticized *the most ethical army in the world* for strafing and killing 5 or 6 little boys playing soccer on a beach in Gaza when the issue was the destruction of children and not religious affiliation.

    …the official narrative about the “Holocaust” should be treated just like the “no moon landing” or “flat earth” or any other theory which should be discussed on its merits and not treated as a form of egregious and evil crimethink.

    It should all be fairly debated, and in the end, the truth should be left standing. But the charge of anti-Semitism, one of the tools in the Left’s toolkit to shut down intelligent discussion, has become the last refuge of those who are either at a loss for a cogent argument or too lazy to formulate one.

    • Replies: @alexander
  7. oscar67 says:

    seems russian nationalists like saker cannot shake off their complicity in judeo bolshevik massacres of non russians so go out of the way to show that counter reaction as homicidal, no saker it was a natural act of revenge that arose against the homicidal judeo bolsheviks aided and abetted by shabbas goim russians. the einstazgruppenn liquidated partisan jews like the Bibis and russian shabbas goim, with feeble minds like that, Bandera was right and ukranians need to steer a course away from russia but mainly the EU

  8. There is also no doubt in my mind at all that the Nazis were genocidal maniacs and self-worshiping racists who butchered millions of totally innocent people, including a very large number of Jews. . . .

    You’ve got that Michael Hoffman meme going on here: “self-worshiping racists” I honestly do not understand the logic behind that description. National Socialists had seen how Bismarck divided Germans against each other, Catholic vs. Protestants; they sought a common unifying factor — German pride. Perhaps that is “self-worship,” as in “German-worship,” but I fail to see the pathology in it. Contrary to Allied propaganda produced by those Zionist leaders you correctly implicate, National Socialism’s unifying propaganda narrative was NOT hatred of Jews, it was valorization of Germanness.

    As for “genocidal maniacs” — dial it back a bit, Saker, at least so that you don’t look like a fool when you contradict yourself a few sentences later, when you reflect that certain reactions “did not come out of nowhere.”
    Furthermore, was Churchill a “genocidal maniac” when he ordered firebombing of German civilians in 131 German cities; or when he acquiesced to Morgenthau plan, or when he agreed to ethnic transfer of millions of German civilians, or when the Russian rape of 2 million women went unprotected?

    But the problem is that there are also those who, once they began having doubts about gas chambers or crematoria, then decided the entire narrative about the “Holocaust” was one big lie and that no Jews at all were targeted or murdered by the Nazis.

    Newton’s Cradle is my favorite symbol.
    My public library is loaded with books (online catalog sorts “2,261 titles” under “Jewish holocaust”) that repeat the position of the left-most balls, exemplified by David Engel, who teaches Holocaust at New York University: “Nazis deliberately planned and used industrial means to kill every single Jewish man, woman and child they could get their hands on” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_x4zgDCaOc

    But that same library stores not a single publication, nor have I viewed or heard a single video, seminar, speech or even conversation that claimed that “no Jews at all were murdered by the Nazis.”
    Newton’s Cradle is busted!

    My personal observation is that the vast majority of those who come to such a (completely unwarranted) conclusions are, indeed, Jew-hating folks who want to whitewash the Nazis and who would gladly parrot any inanity as long as it is somehow anti-Jewish or pro-Nazi.

    Have you met people who “whitewash Napoleon?” Or who “whitewash Hannibal?” Or Julius Caesar? What ad hominem labels are attached to them?

    Why is it that any exploration or explanation other than the dogmatized narrative is considered “anti-Jewish” or “pro-Nazi?”

    Truth lies in the middle, where all of Newton’s balls are clustered.

    Not very smart, for sure, but it is nonetheless true that their hostility towards anything Jewish or their sympathies for the Nazis did not come out of nowhere but are a reaction to what they feel is the toxic and oppressive power of “the Jews” over their countries or society.

    You’re contradicting yourself all over the place: “Not smart” but “did not come out of nowhere.”

    Furthermore, you’re stuck in the realm of emotion, not logic and reason: you pit “Jew-hating” against “whitewash Nazis” and “hostility” against “sympathy.”

    Historian Thomas Fleming has observed that it takes fifty years or so for history to be written; before that, it’s emotion speaking, not cool, objective weighing of the evidence in the archives.

    http://www.c-span.org/video/?164982-1/book-discussion-new-dealers-war

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @Curmudgeon
  9. nsa says:

    The word “jew” when hurled directly at someone is considered a severe insult by almost everyone, including jews. Hence the cultural use of coded euphemisms like “anti-semite”, “zionist”, “neocon”, “banker”, “shyster”, etc. Maybe “jews” are just neurotic relentlessly self-serving assholes and everyone knows it, at least sub-consciously, including even the legions of useful idiot chrissie zios.

    • Replies: @trulee
    , @Eckbach
  10. alexander says:
    @Giuseppe

    Good comment.

    It is interesting how people choose to define “neoconservative”.

    I never associated it with any specific ethnicity but more with an ideology.

    That ideology is distinct in that it promotes “war of aggression” as an acceptable tool of foreign policy.

    Which , since WWII ,is recognized as the supreme international crime……by everybody….including the United States.

    Furthermore, there is nothing within the U.S. constitution which permits or abides “war of aggression”, for any reason.

    The crime of “war of aggression” is akin to “mass murder” under US statutory law.

    Given these facts , it is an extraordinary thing that “neoconservatives” ever came into existence.

  11. While I am sure that the historical evidence really supports the allegations about the organised Nazi murder of Jews, I also know that the number of others murdered by the Nazi regime equalled or exceeded those who happened to be Jewish. Otherwise, I fully agree with the Saker’s statement and feel that the whole antisemitism accusation thing will soon lead to a major backlash which will in fact be anti-semitic, particularly against “professional” pro-Israeli elements. The fact that this is itself being propagated in part to defend pro-war demands and even war crimes will intensify this wave, as well as the fact that, as indicated, the entire effort is being mounted against those who recognize reality and the dangerous implications of what is being propagated and the almost unlimited power of those doing the propagation.

  12. @exiled off mainstreet

    While I am sure that the historical evidence really supports the allegations about the organised Nazi murder of Jews,

    Please share with us the sources, context and nature of the “historical evidence” that is the foundation for your certainty.

    Is it a vague belief derived from the zeitgeist; a body of knowledge acquired via mass media/TV/movies, or the result of study in primary and secondary documents and histories?

  13. Svigor says:

    Today, I want to do something a little different: look at a political tactic which appears to give Jews a very desirable position but which in reality places them all at risk: the use of the accusation of “anti-Semitism” on practically anybody who dares to be critical of anybody and anything Jewish. The following recent headline on RT was what inspired me to discuss this issue:

    “Right-wing” Jews throw up their hands and claim they can’t do anything about these “Jewish Berserkers,” as Unz calls them. It’s true enough that members of a group aren’t personally responsible for the behavior of others, but they are responsible for their own. E.g., the white political class are Uncle Toms and race-traitors, and pro-whites certainly aren’t responsible for their behavior. But – and this is the important part – pro-whites are a rather noticeable dissident resistance to the white Uncle Toms and race-traitors.

    Where are the “right wing” Jews collectively resisting and opposing the “Jewish berserkers”? That’s right – there aren’t enough to form a collective dissident resistance. In other words, “Jewish berserkers” are far more representative of Jews as a whole, and even “right wing” Jews, than White Uncle Toms are of Whites as a whole, especially pro-Whites.

    “Right wing” Jews who oppose the bad actors in their tribe are a rounding error. They are statistically meaningless.

    Keep this in mind, the next time a “right wing” Jew gives you grief over painting Jews with a broad brush; he has time to defend his tribe, but no time to form a statistically meaningful resistance to anti-White organized Jewry. He’s effectively on the same team as they are. Rather than spend his time fighting for the right, he spends it fighting for the Jews.

    All this while his tribe paints yours with a broad brush from the commanding heights of Big Media (“white privilege,” “white men this, white men that,” bla bla bla). Funny how that doesn’t stir him to action.

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
  14. Svigor says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Maybe they learned it from the Jews; if any group could be accused of self-worship, they’d be it.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  15. @romar

    romar—So, then, the current worst enemy of the Jews is old Soros?

    Gilad Atzmon, speaking with inside knowledge, believes that the Jews are their own worst enemy:

    ‘Basically, Jews are tormented by anti Semitism because they assume that their own “goy hatred” is echoed by “Jew hatred” from their gentile neighbours. As Martin Heidegger noted in the 1930s, the Jews opposed in the Nazis the racism which they recognized from themselves. Heidegger wrote in his Black Notebooks: the Jewish people, with their talent for calculation, were so vehemently opposed to the Nazi’s racial theories because “they themselves have lived according to the race principle for longest.”’

  16. Anon[223] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Because of the constant use of “anti-semitic” or “anti-semitism” on anyone critical of Israel, Israel’s treatment of Palestinians, Israel’s seeming ownership of the US govt., Israel’s seeming ownership of US Christianity under the guise of Christian Zionism (an apostasy IMHO), “Judeo-Christianity” (an oxymoron IMHO), anyone critical of Talmudic Jewry (the synagogue of Satan IMHO), or anyone who sticks up for us goyim-cattle-slaves of the Jews…because of this crap, “anti-semitism” and “anti-semitic” has not only become meaningless, but has also become a badge of honor! It is a badge of honor to stand against genocide of Palestinians, abominations like Christian Zionism and the Talmud-Zohar-Kabbalah, and the notion that us gentiles are not human or sub-human!

    And for anyone (Jew or not Jew) who calls me “anti-semitic” I will says this–if you are Ashkenazi, then you are of JAPHETH (Ashkenaz is the grandson of Japheth, and his father Gomer is considered the father of the Khazars, where these Ashkenazis come from, among other Turkic tribes)…so, if you are Ashkenazi, you aren’t even a SEMITE! but guess who is? THE PALESTINIANS!

    • Agree: jacques sheete
  17. peterAUS says:

    those still capable of critical thought will challenge the official narratives about 9/11 or about the “Holocaust”. I would even argue that any good and interesting history book will always be revisionist, at least to some degree.

    Yes.

    Jewish organizations are profoundly alienating all those capable of independent thought.

    True. Not many of those, though.

    I find it extremely unlikely that the Nazis used gas chambers or crematoria in any large numbers. I would never presume to say that this “never” happened, but I personally don’t believe that this happened in any large numbers (this is why I consider the word “Holocaust,” which means “all/whole-burning,” a very misleading term). I also believe that the (quasi-obligatory) figure of 6 million is a vast exaggeration.

    Yup.

    I’d change this

    There is also no doubt in my mind at all that the Nazis were genocidal maniacs and self-worshiping racists who butchered millions of totally innocent people, including a very large number of Jews.

    Into

    There is also no doubt in my mind at all that the Nazis executed millions of people, including a very large number of Jews.

    I just believe that most of their victims were either murdered by the SS Einsatzgruppen or starved to death in various concentration camps (including many smaller, lesser known ones). Is that really less evil than using gas chambers or crematoria? I sure don’t think so. Neither do I think that four, three, two or even “just” one million murdered innocent is much better than six million. I know that there are many others out there who came to similar conclusions. But the problem is that there are also those who, once they began having doubts about gas chambers or crematoria, then decided the entire narrative about the “Holocaust” was one big lie and that no Jews at all were targeted or murdered by the Nazis.

    Yup.

    My personal observation is that the vast majority of those who come to such a (completely unwarranted) conclusions are, indeed, Jew-hating folks who want to whitewash the Nazis and who would gladly parrot any inanity as long as it is somehow anti-Jewish or pro-Nazi.

    You are onto something here.

    What Jewish/Zionist organizations are trying to impose on the rest of the planet is a blanket immunity from any criticism for all Jews (except the “self-hating” ones, of course!) combined with a grim determination to crush anybody daring to oppose such plans.

    Yup.

    The chances that most of the world will ever accept such mental shackles are virtually nil. What is much more likely is that the resistance to such efforts will grow, no doubt reported to the public as an “emergence of a new anti-Semitism” or something equally vapid. And at the end of the road, there will always be a powerful backlash against those who started it all. So what is the point?

    Ah………THAT is something you could write your next article about, perhaps.
    Because

    I am left wondering whether all these Jewish/Zionist organizations are staffed merely by incompetent people, or whether creating more, not less, anti-Semitism might not be the real goal of these organizations.

    They aren’t incompetent and that’s not they goal. On a good path, though. Keep on it.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  18. This link has lots of info that includes: “The protester who cornered Jeff Flake, Colombia-born Ana Maria Archila, is the co-executive director of the Soros-funded Center for Popular Democracy.”

    https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=59177

  19. Skeptikal says:
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    I have to say that I agree with this—it is similar to my own experience.
    For a long time I had no feelings whatsoever about whether someone was Jewish or not.
    A lot of the first intelligent, “interesting” people I met happened to be secular Jews from Westchester County–because they were summer visitors in the area where I grew up.

    As time went on I became more positively disposed toward Jews generally, in particular I came to appreciate my own (1/4) Jewish background and the fact that my grandfather had NOT been a Zionist or supporter of the Zionist cause.

    Then, when a friend of mine joined the first Freedom Flotilla, I became aware of the Palestinian cause and crisis. As my knowledge of that situation, and of the actual history of the Zionist state, grew, I became more critical of Jews generally and especially of American Jews and their support of the Zionist state. The more I learn about the Jewish religion, the more the whole idea of Judaism turns me off (and I do feel that with all the demerits of Christianity and its history, it still has a heck of a lot more to offer than Judaism, and the effort to convert Jews should continue; the poor Jews, they need to have some kind of alternative!). Meanwhile, most of the secular Jews I had known had become religious, and had become fanatic supporters of Israel while being paranoid about the danger they were in in the USA and hypersensitive toward “anti-Semitism” and expect everyone to share their priorities and their paranoia. Stories about Jews became more and more prominent in the local newspaper. Why? Who was interested in the navel gazing of this small community? The more power neocons gained in American govt, the more alienated I became from Jews in general. The more I hear of the power of dual citizens in our govt, such as Rahm Emanuel, the more disgusted I am with the whole American Jewish community, and with our elites for kowtowing to these individuals and this faction (except now so many in the “elite” are in fact neocons and their water carriers). The economic crash of 2008 and the appointments of Larry Summers and other top-level Jewish financiers to positions where they could engineer the bailout of their pals was another nail in the coffin of my positive regard for American Jews. I feel that I have actually become something of an anti-Semite. I am kind of sick of reading constantly about Jews and the constant stream of self-serving films, etc. that show just one point of view: Jews as virtuous innocent victims. No one dares show a naughty Jew, such as Fagin!

    • Replies: @Svigor
    , @animalogic
  20. the root cause of anti-Jewiism is

    Jews. So

    the only way to end the scourge of anti-Jewism is

    liquidate the Jews. Or

    everybody else. Clearly,

    the Jews have chosen the latter course. And

    who are we to blame them?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  21. Them Guys says:

    They have greatly ramped up to almost a daily 24/7 constant theme and non stop complaints of…..Antisemite this and that. Most every day of every week, several tv channels keep showing repeat episodes of….Hitler, Nazis, Hitler’s SS, Hitler and his Drugs, Hitler’s women, His dog, His bicycle as a small child, his everything possible Hitler some Hollywood Jews can conjure up and create a new tv show on.

    There is but One main reason this is happening and why its Now so promoted like at no other previous times, and done in every form media possible. Jewspapers, Magazines, Online, Big Hollywood movies, TV shows, every MSM News station. And scores of new books that always make Jew York Times Best seller lists within Hours of release.

    And that main reason is due to Jewry in general, and especially pro Jew orgs such as ADL-SPLC and a few Hundred more same type pro Jew orgs and non profits…..Which always seem to profit massively by magnitudes of Hundreds of Millions per year……Has realized that their constant use of Weaponized words like, anti-Semite and Nazi-Jew Hater, etc….Is soon going to have close to zero effect. In other words…Jews know they have so over done it, that now those word weapons have All either fully Lost its MoJo effect….Or will soon join words used by angry Militant and violence prone Negroes when they over use the word of, Racist, against Whites.

    Racist as a word weapon has totally lost its prior MoJo effects, period. Yes there always will be that aprox. 10 to 20% of American Whiteys such as radical lib losers and dems who never will shed their massive guilt feelings and beliefs. But they matter Not. For in all other ways, calling a White person a Racist is ignored or literally laughed at by the rest or the aprox 90+% Whites with a brain.

    And Jews and their many orgs Know their weaponized words of antisemite and nazi Jew hater will very soon join with Racist, when the little left of its MoJo effects have finally ended.

    This makes perfect sense too….Jews invented use of weapon words today heard constantly, they are who brought Negroes here firstly, then watched blacks grow into a huge population, knowing all along that if any White nation has a negro pop that reaches about 10% of total pop, that means curtains for that nation is soon at hand…Of course Jewry speeded it up by training and teaching their pet monkys to become so wild and militant, and so violent against Whites.

    First Jews used Antisemite and Jew Hater as weapons, then thru Jew run MSM and fed govnt laws etc got blacks to use Racist in same way as a word weapon, and always against Whites.

    So ergo it follows logically that if Racist has Lost its MoJo effects, so too shall Antisemite lose its MoJo effects soon…..Both invented by Jews, Both employed by Jews, and with added benefit of Jews pets aka african savages to boot, assisting Jewry in anti-Whitey efforts.

    Many folks well know what comes next once all their former huge MoJo effects are gone in America.

    And since Jews and their pet monkeys both put all they have into One basket. Then like that old saying of, Do not put all your eggs into one basket, is certain to apply to Jewry and Blackie both. They each have Zero remaining MoJo effect Maker options left to use. This they Fear big time.

    They greatly Fear Whitey going all out Nazi on their sorry asses. Perhaps they should, as maybe most do deserve what some call the Karma effect, eh.

    Good to remember that…Negroes wreck and ruin Cities and burn em down….And International Jewry wrecks and ruins entire Nations!……However, once Whitey gets really fed up enough, which typically takes much longer time wise to occur, but occur it shall, and once it does….Entire Continents get wrecked and Burned down to ground…With those folks contained within it!

    Gated with private cops and retired trained police dogs at gate communities many nation wrecker Jews reside in, wont stop it. That’s “If” their Pet Monkeys leave anything still standing after blackie gets wized up too and goes berzerko on their Jewish trainers/Owners, eh.

    Tic-Toc….Tic-Toc….Karma soon calling!

    ps: We haven’t even yet discussed the added Woes to occur if and when Divine Intervention is put into play, on behalf of the real True Children of God, aka The True Christians that Jews so hate like none others. Thats when Khazar Jewry realizes they are actually Edmonites of Esua, and Not any so called, self-chozens. Not a single rock left to hide under when that day arrives. OyVehy!

    • Replies: @Wade
  22. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:

    ‘Antisemitism’ is now a trick term used by Jewish Elites to discredit any criticism of Jewish power and influence.

    Strange thing about US politics… the Power didn’t go from Wasp Elite Rule to All-American-rule. In other words, the power didn’t go from the Wasp tower to the American square. Rather, it passed from Wasp tower to Jewish tower. It went from Anglo-elitism to Judeo-elitism. THAT is the problem of American Power.

    According to the Jewish Narrative, Bad Old America was about Wasp elites hogging most power and privilege for themselves. So, the Good New America would be about that power passing to all Americans equally. But it didn’t happen that way. The once-Wasp-Power went mostly to Jewish elites instead of to All of America equally. THIS is what Jews are trying to hide. They want us to believe either that

    (1) The Power went from Wasp elitism to All of America equally(than to Jews)

    or

    (2) The Power still remains with Big Bad White Male Privilege, and therefore, Jews and non-whites must work together to bring down this Nasty Wasp Country Club Power.

    The problem with this Narrative is that it totally ignores the fact that Wasp Elite Power passed over to Jewish Elite Power. In other words, Jews are the ‘new wasps’. Actually, it’s worse. If Wasp Power was out in the open, Jewish Power remains hidden. It is plain-as-day for anyone who wants to notice it, but if the observer says something about it, he is denounced and destroyed as an ‘anti-Semite’.

    If ‘antisemitism’ awareness in the past was about protecting vulnerable Jews, it is now about safeguarding the ultra-power of the super-privileged Jewish elites. Jewish elites simply want us to remain mum about the fact that Wasp elite power did NOT surrender to All-American Power of All Groups, white and non-white, but instead surrendered to Jewish elite power.
    Jews want non-Wasp Americans to see Jews as allies and fellow comrades against Wasp elite power. In other words, the American People are to believe that Jews have been anti-elitist and working hard to transform the elitist nature of American Power(in the hands of Wasps) into something more democratic and egalitarian. Burn down the country clubs of power and turn American Power into one big square for everyone.

    But in fact, Jewish power did no such thing. Rather, it took over the elite institutions from Wasps and has been ruling America on the basis of “Is it good for the Jews?” Jews didn’t burn down the country clubs. They took them over or built bigger and more lavish ones for themselves. To hide this fact, Jews train and hire yellow dogs like Sarah Jeong to bark at the never-fading specter of White Privilege.
    The fact that Jewish power hates Populism so much gives the game away though. Elitism is their thing.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  23. Svigor says:
    @Skeptikal

    If one is:
    1 reasonably intelligent
    2 reasonably honest
    3 paying attention
    4 not a Jew

    Then one is an antisemite.

  24. The US government attacked its own people on that day without a name.

    You patriots can’t stomach it. But that’s what happened.

    • Replies: @Wally
  25. Anonymous[748] • Disclaimer says:

    Whatever may be the case, anti-Semitism is not something which “just exists.” It is something which must be rekindled over and over again. Left alone, it would just fizzle out.

    - Please stop. Can we please stop this insanity after 2+ millennia?

    - Sweden is trying your “live – bring them in – and let live” approach. They’re getting raped, killed and decimated as we speak. They’ll be exterminated within a decade if they can’t figure out that the Jews are using the Muslims – once again – as useful idiots.

    - If you can’t figure out what your ancestors did, in similar circumstances, to save you and the rest of their children, you’re lost and you shouldn’t be using the Net to spread your suicidal ignorance.

  26. Maybe the Soros plan is to make Jews uncomfortable in Europe? Someone has to fill all those settler homes they are building on stolen Palestinian land, and perhaps the local Jews aren’t breeding fast enough to keep up?

  27. Patricus says:
    @Biff

    Wikipedia is an unfortunate choice as a source of credible facts. It is political.

    • Replies: @Biff
  28. Jett Rucker says: • Website

    (Screams of) anti-Semitism are the lifeblood of present-day Judaism. Without it, the movement, so to call it, would wither and blow away.

    • Replies: @Drapetomaniac
  29. anon[278] • Disclaimer says:

    More for me. Less for you. 3/for me .3/for you….

    Sorry. Just counting the anti-goyim insults and mis-appropriation of culture and patents by those scheming semites. Scum. They are vermin. My God.promised jews to me as slaves. What are they babbling about now? Knew I should have shot more of.’em.

  30. Biff says:
    @Patricus

    Yea, that should be a “duh” moment for everyone, but unfortunately it isn’t.

    In the movie Morris never decides for the viewer, but Wikipedia does infact decide for the reader, which renders it propaganda.

    In addition, the review on Morris’ website of the movie review is written by someone other than Morris, and decides for the reader as well, but from what I can tell is he has been steadfastly silent on the subject probably knowing it is pure kryptonite for a movie career, but still that has been his modus of brilliant movie making – just staying silent.

    Also, the reviews of the movie discuss it in only one dimension “Holocaust denial”, when there are a half a dozen other angles/issues happening, and another half a dozen that remain untouched – i.e. half life of the gas used, what types of gas(some stop breathing, while other paralyze nerves) how exactly is it vented, static pressures in and outside gas chambers, etc…

    Yet cost and risk was mentioned and that is where I thought Leuchter was onto something.

  31. @alexander

    Neoconservatism is a Jewish ideology that seeks to make the mainstream American right more amenable to Jewish interests. To the extent that it’s largely succeeded in that goal, it may in truth make little sense to speak of neoconservatism, since most (non-Jewish) American conservatives embrace its core precepts.

  32. Are you retarded, Saker?
    No one will contest censorship laws protecting Jews for the same reason no one did against the laws who forbid questioning the holocaust in Europe, or those new one who outlaw calls for boycot and criticism of Israel:

    No one knows the importance of any of this, and thinks of these things are vastly distant and irrelevant things.

    Come on.

  33. Nazi-ism is the mirror image of Judaism;
    ingroup preference
    outgroup hostility
    genetic purity

    The Germans were NOT homicidal maniacs, but the Bolsheviks certainly WERE, and that is why the Germans were forced to fight back.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  34. Wally says:

    My my, the classic strawman approach by you, Saker. No one said that ‘the Nazis loved Jews’, but let’s cut to the chase. Here’s a few basic questions which you should be able to answer, IF you know what you are talking about. Please, no name calling.

    [MORE]

    - Please present your proof of ‘millions of totally innocent people butchered by the ‘Nazis’.’
    - Please present your proof for your claims about the Einsatzgruppen.
    - Please present your proof about your “starved to death in various concentration camps”, I assume you meant ‘intentionally’.
    - I challenge you to show us the immense human remains that would necessarily exist, recall that the alleged locations of these, what would be truly immense, remains are allegedly known.
    - I remind you that Jews have been promoting their fake ’6M’ (not 4M, not 3M, not 2M) since at least 1823.
    - I suggest that you or anyone apply the same critical, rational, & scientific thought to my above questions / points, as you to do to the utterly impossible, laughable ‘Nazi gas chambers’ … which you cannot present proof of a single example.

    We await your responses.
    For much more I suggest that you first review American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/
    and the comments made by myself and others which simply refute your ‘holocaust-lite’, which you use as a way to deal with your cognitive dissonance.

    “Does anybody seriously believe something so totally ridiculous?” – Ron Unz

    I do appreciate your claimed willingness to support free speech on the matter, though your unwarranted harshness causes grave doubts about your sincerity.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Amber Dekstris
  35. ” There is also no doubt in my mind at all that the Nazis were genocidal maniacs and self-worshiping racists who butchered millions of totally innocent people, including a very large number of Jews. ”

    I wonder on what this no doubt is based.
    I was born in the occupied Netherlands, though of course my parents were anti German, my father so anti German that he refused to march with his students to the German Kulturkammer, both of them never described Germans as genocidal maniacs.
    A jewish friend of my father was in the Dutch resistance, was caught and executed, even this caused no hatred of Germans.
    After my father left his job, went ‘underground’ with his parents, the local Wehrmacht commander knew very well that he was there, and warned my grandfather for razzia’s.

    For France the same, a allied officer with the Normandy invasion forces said ‘the French were not at all happy with us, we disturbed their cozy lives under German occupation’.

    Then there is
    Milovan Djilas, ‘Wartime. With Tito and the Partisans’, London, 1980
    Djilas was sent by Tito to negotiate with the Germans, and found out, to his surprise that they were normal people, not the robotic killers of the propaganda.

    This then leaves Russia, and the Einsatz Kommndo’s.
    The whole ‘evidence ‘ about these Einsatz Kommando’s, said to be some twenty, in total a thousand men, is based on the ‘confessions’ of some twelve of them at the Neurenverg show trials.
    Anyone interested in how the Neurenberg ‘confessions’ were obtained I recommend
    Richard Overy, ‘Interrogations, the Nazi elite in Allied hands, 1945’, London 2001
    Who is interested in the miracles performed by an Einsatz Gruppe I can recommend
    Léon Poliakov, ‘Bréviaire de la Haine, Le IIIe Reich et les Juifs’, 1951, 1974, Paris
    Quite sure there is an english translation.
    I for one think it is a mircacle how on average fifty men succeeded in killing 40.000 people, leaving no trace whatsoever.

    This leaves us with one thing, Russian resistance, partisans, to a large extent organised by Stalin by dropping communist agents behind German lines, and providing them with weapons.
    In combating this resistance the Germans were not zimperlich, they behaved radically.
    Bogdan Musial, ´Sowjetische Partisanen 1941 – 1944, Mythos und Wirklichkeit’, Paderborn 2009

    But this was on both sides:
    Alfred M. de Zayas, ´Die Wehrmacht-Untersuchungsstelle, Dokumentation allierter Kriegsverbrechen im Zweiten Weltkrieg’ , 1979, 2001, München
    UN human rights specialist de Zayas describes mainly Russian war crimes.

  36. My definition of an antisemite: someone hated by jews.
    But let there be no misunderstanding, before getting equal rights during the 19th century jews were persecuted, for nearly two thousand years.

    But, I cited this book often,
    jewish Israeli historian
    ‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA
    explains in clear terms how antisemitism, people not liking jews, was caused by jews themselves after getting equal rights.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  37. @oscar67

    Ukronazi warning! The Banderites still trying to provoke a war which will destroy Ukraine.

  38. Da Wei says:

    Dear Mr. The Saker,

    I’m confused and maybe you can help me out here. You write:

    “Personally, … I don’t even use a category like “the Jews” which I consider to be meaningless. However, I do lay the blame for this situation on organized Jewry …”

    So … what is true of the whole is not true, in varying degrees, of the constituent parts?
    If this is so, does something happen when Zionist individuals organize that creates a moral opprobrium? Is the whole — the organization — greater (or more obnoxious) than the sum of the parts? Are their individual tendencies amplified, or does something new take over?

    We’re in a real pickle.

    I realize you are being reasonable and humanistic and fair, but what is the solution, to deny Jews organization? Shut down the FED and take back our money system they stole? Close the banks and the US Congress? Or just stop kissing Israel’s ass and funding their wars?

    A conspiracy is an agreement between 2 or more individuals to do something unlawful or immoral. Is this the “organized Jewry” that you speak of, and is yours a conspiracy theory?

    I want to be a kind and reasonable guy, too, but Douglas Reed’s haunting book, The Controversy of Zion, details more than two thousand years of chicanery. Did it all start when Jews formed their first club? Does it not appear that where there’s smoke there’s fire?

  39. Renoman says:

    Why people hate the Jews? Let me count the reasons, no wait the list is too long, just follow the money, you’ll get it.

    • Replies: @Da Wei
  40. @Wally

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.

    What in your view is the correct number for Jews? And for Others? Thank you.

  41. RouterAl says:

    Being a post war baby , I grew up with the story of our heroic victory against the evils of the Nazi’s and the death camps. When I retired recently freed from having to read material relating to work I was free to read more widely and on other matters.
    I found the http://www.codoh.com site and downloaded all their books, after having read them all , I then read yet more on the war and the holocaust.

    My take on it, is it was all about banking and usury, the Germans and the Japanese got rid of Jewish usurers , and started state banks , and the Jewish usurers in London and Wall street via their stooges Roosevelt and Churchill and the Jewish Bolsheviks attacked them and re-introduced usury and debt slavery. In the process another large number Christians were killed , and there is little evidence that many Jews were killed, certainly not deliberately by the Germans.

    The Einsatzgruppen are supposed to have killed millions and yet not a mass grave has ever been found of Jews, while mass graves from Jewish NVKD killings , including Katyn litter Eastern Europe, and just recently a mass grave of 2k Germans mainly women and children killed by the Poles was found in Malbork. Even the Jewish favourite massacre Bibi Yar has failed to produce even a bullet or shell casing from the site and the aerial pictures of the time show no activity at the site.

    There are now few historian’s willing to say there were any gas chambers in any German camps, except for clothing sterilisation, one even had the worlds first micro wave cloths steriliser.It’s hard to believe the Germans would use as a killing agent Zyklon B , and use it by dropping it on a cold concrete floor to vaporise , when they had some really nasty nerve gas agents which would have done the job way more efficiently.

    John 8:44 indicates we have had trouble with Jews telling the truth for some time.

    My advice read for yourself and make up your own mind , but if you come to the same conclusion as I did , be careful where you express your doubts, especially in Germany.

  42. trulee says:
    @nsa

    So tell us NSA, what exactly does the “euphemistically coded” “anti-semite”/”zionist”/ “neocon”/ “banker”/ “shyster” hurl at those not of their ilk – more needless war to be waged and paid for by the United States on behalf not of its own interests, but those of Israel?

    That’s not merely a “severe insult” – that’s a direct threat to a citizen of the United States.

  43. Miro23 says:
    @Anon

    Conspiracy Fact in the case of 9/11, which itself raises the question, Why take the enormous risks of this operation?

    If it failed – which it more or less has on the US side (the US is still a roughly functioning democracy) – and given our digital age, and given the complexity and number of moving parts, the truth filters out and the public “get it” – What then?

    Awareness of new information follows an “S” curve over time.

    Reliable 9/11 knowledge has passed the early adopter phase and is accelerating fast. When the majority of the US public “get” what really happened to the WTC towers, their Congressional representatives will have to choose between their base and AIPAC (commit to MAGA or MIGA).

  44. @Skeptikal

    I suspect your experience reflects that of many others who are mentally open to history & politics.
    There (at least) two (interconnected) aspects to “Jewish issues”.
    1. Israel – Zionism.
    2. Organised Jewry outside Israel.
    The two are mutually self reinforcing. Money/power flows each way. Each can excuse the crimes of the other. Each can shape shift from one to the other as expedience demands.
    It’s a neat trick while you can get away with it.

  45. @romar

    Interesting. So, then, the current worst enemy of the Jews is old Soros?
    in which case, why is he allowed to continue?

    He’s right up there with the goofy Izzy firsters.

    Many decent Jews predicted, anticipated and condemned such things and consequently opposed and criticized the Zionist project in Palestine.

    Here, Hannah Arendt, former Zionist writing from Jerusalem shortly after the formation of the state, describes the pit,

    What would have been possible in this pigsty that calls itself the Near East is incredible…From a political standpoint, things are even more hopeless than I thought…Everyone, with very few exceptions, is idiotic,often to an outlandish degree. the galut-and -ghetto mentality is in full bloom. And the idiocy is right in front of everyone’s eyes…

    On top of that, they treat the Arabs, those still here, in a way that in itself would be enough to rally the whole world against Israel.

    -Hannah Arendt, letter to Heinrich Blücher, 10.22.55 as published in “Within Four Walls: The Correspondence between Hannah Arendt and Heinrich Blücher, 1936-1968” (1996), p282

    The worst anti-Semites in the world are obviously the Izzy firsters.

  46. @Johnny Rottenborough

    Superb insight, excellent comment. Sooo true.

    Israel ought to be renamed Projectors-R-Us.

    • Replies: @Anon
  47. @Anon

    Excellent analysis, superb conclusion.

    Elitism is their thing.

    What else to expect from “The Chosen?” :)

  48. The US government attacked its own people on that day without a name.

    The day has a name, but you dare not name in whose name the gubbermint rules.

    Here’s a memory aid for yi.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  49. Wade says:
    @Them Guys

    It’s like the chronic liar who always needs to tell more lies to avoid getting caught in previous lies. Jews got political power through lying, cheating the democratic process through buying off both sides –wars included– suppressing descent through accusations of “anti-semitism”, dirty business dealings such as the housing bubble and subsequent collapse in 2007 (this was proven to have been a conspiracy. David Brooks of the New York Times wrote about it. Of course he didn’t blame Jews. His angle was that it was a “liberal” conspiracy against the Republican POV. He pointed his critique at Paul Krugman types), etc…

    So, now that they know antisemitism is catching on they have to ratchet things up with ever increasing levels of chutzpah to keep everyone in their place. That’s how the US is behaving towards its citizens and the rest of the world: more lies and more war. If they did the right thing by improving their relations with gentiles through genuinely honest dealings, it would threaten to expose their whole infrastructure of control which has accreted over the decades.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  50. @Bennis Mardens

    The Germans were NOT homicidal maniacs, but the Bolsheviks certainly WERE, and that is why the Germans were forced to fight back.

    Amen.

    And that should be all that needs to be said. You summed up the bulk of 20th century history in one sentence. Bravo!

  51. Da Wei says:
    @Renoman

    Yes, “follow the money” through the rubble of destruction, and “you’ll get it.”

    • Agree: jacques sheete
  52. @Amber Dekstris

    What in your view is the correct number for Jews? And for Others? Thank you.

    Who knows, but you may be interested in this. Note the source and date.

    Allowing for a maximum of 100,000 who succeeded in emigrating from Europe, this would bring the total number of Jews under the direct rule of Nazi Germany to about 3,200,000.

    664 AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK (1942)

    http://www.ajcarchives.org/AJC_DATA/Files/1941_1942_9_Statistics.pdf

    Since there are endless numbers of “H” survivors, it’s apparent not all of the 3.2 million were snuffed, so the figure of 6 million is utterly bogus.

    Also, any Jews in camps were probably Commies and other enemies of the state and many deaths both inside and outside the camps could no doubt be blamed on the Brit starvation blockade during and after the war just as happened with WW1

  53. Dumbest Race in the world: white trash airyans… Never learn with the experiences…

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  54. Wraith says:

    When a Jew in Alaska gets fucked with and overnight a Jew from South Africa is printing something online coming to his defense, I will conclude that a conspiracy is exactly what we have on our hands. Jews come out of the woodwork from around the globe almost immediately to denounce anything they feel threatening their interests. How could this be anything other than a conspiracy? The communication ties, the speed of organization, the coordinated attack on perceived enemies. This is what a conspiracy looks like.

  55. How could this be anything other than a conspiracy?

    This thread has produced a number of excellent points. Yours is one of them.

  56. @Santoculto

    Dumbest Race in the world: white trash airyans… Never learn with the experiences…

    I know and have known many who are not white trash, but they are overwhelmingly airheads at least in a political sense. They are just as guilty vis a vis never learning, and that, I think, accounts for a goodly portion of our troubles.

  57. Steve Hayes says: • Website

    George Soros is not a Jew, he is an atheist. The people who claim that critical comment about Soros is anti-Semitic are themselves engaging in the kind of racialising that the Nazis practised.

  58. @Wade

    That’s how the US is behaving towards its citizens and the rest of the world: more lies and more war.

    Yup.

    No one has ever doubted that truth and politics are on rather bad terms with each other…

    Seen from the viewpoint of politics, truth has a despotic character. It is therefore hated by tyrants, who rightly fear the competition of a coercive force they cannot monopolize, and it enjoys a rather precarious status in the eyes of governments that rest on consent and abhor coercion.

    -Hannah Arendt, TRUTH AND POLITICS, https://idanlandau.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/arendt-truth-and-politics.pdf

    Trumpsters and Hillarynas alike, take note.:

    I might add that truth enjoys a rather precarious status even in the eyes of governments that supposedly rest on consent, protect liberty and abhor coercion.

  59. @Steve Hayes

    George Soros is not a Jew, he is an atheist.

    Lots of secular Jews claim to be atheists, I think.

    However, they may not be atheists so much as worshippers of mammon or Satan or whoever the G-d of sadism (?Yaweh?) is and the like.

    Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.
    Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew.
    What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.

    -Karl Marx, On The Jewish Question, 1844

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  60. @Steve Hayes

    George Soros is, and is not, a Jew.

    Like so many others he wants to have his cake

    And eat it too.

    (My apologies for another cringeworthy jingle to Sam the Divine Maven who’s sadly left us.)

  61. Wally says:
    @Amber Dekstris

    The Red Cross disease caused death numbers seem reasonable. The numbers that the German recorded themselves make sense.

    I have seen no proof of exterminations in gas chambers or by any other means. Do you have any such proof?

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Amber Dekstris
  62. Wally says:
    @jilles dykstra

    informative discussions here:

    [MORE]

    ‘The Einsatzgruppen Trial’ / from the journal, Inconvenient History.

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11791

    former Einsatzgruppen Members Reject Bizarre Claims of Mass Shootings / Babi Yar, etc.: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11396

    On one of the biggest alleged Einsatzgruppen actions:
    !! Excavation Result: No Enormous Human Remains as Alleged at Babi Yar !! … of course: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11314

    aerial of Babi Yar at exact time of the absurdly alleged shooting of 34,000 Jews:

    Nothing happening that would necessarily be happening IF the story was factual.

    much more: American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    http://www.codoh.com

  63. anarchyst says:

    Jews were behind the destructive “civil-rights” marches and legislation imposed on the majority of Americans. It was jewish Supreme Court “justices” (I use that term loosely) who outlawed “freedom of association” (but only for whites), overturning Plessey v. Ferguson and imposing Brown v. Board of Education.This rulings turned white Americans into second-class citizens. It was jewish and black Supreme Court justices who made these flawed rulings. It is interesting to note that Brown v. Board of Educationwas decided as a result of a test of white v. black dolls (toys) and showed that black children still had a preference for white dolls, thereby showing that there was a dysfunction that whites were forced to rectify.
    It is interesting to note, that even in the 1950s and 1960s, us whites had a saying: Behind every negro, there is a jew”. No truer words were spoken…

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  64. Very interesting. If it is pointed out that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is being used by Wall Street bankers to embezzle trillions from the US government, would that be labeled anti-semitic ?

    If Trump wanted to strike at the Federal Reserve/Wall Street, military cabal and their ceaseless war-mongering [and their apparent plan to blame an economic collapse on Trump), he could instruct the GAO conduct an audit of specific accounts of government Treasury security auctions handled by the US fiscal agent, FRBNY, involving $10 trillion annually. The accounts are exclusively handled by the FRBNY and have never been audited. Ref. 31 CFR 375.3. Crimes are alleged, with specific unavoidable detailed actions, to have occurred. Ref. https://thedailycoin.org/2018/08/16/a-look-at-the-federal-reserve-through-a-different-lens/.

    But then again, Benjamin Ginsberg has already confirmed the link in FATAL EMBRACE; JEWS AND THE STATE when he elaborates on the national bankruptcies brought by medieval Rothschild banking. He even identifies the Magna Carta was the result of the Baron’s revolt against the war-mongering by his clan of London bankers. He laments the resultant seizure of estates, physical abuse, and exiles that resulted.
    .
    .

  65. Wally says:
    @Steve Hayes

    Soros describes himself as a Jew.
    Jews describe Soros as a Jew.
    Oops!

    Got proof of ‘Nazi gas chambers? Nope.

    http://www.codoh.com

  66. @Johnny Rottenborough

    When the Nuremburg laws of 1935 were drawn up to segregate Jews from German life, the question of “Who is a Jew?” had to be addressed. The Nazis’ definition of Jew, 1/2 Jew, mischlinge, etc. was basically taken from the Jews’ own self-definition rules.

    • Agree: Che Guava
  67. “There is also no doubt in my mind at all that the Nazis were genocidal maniacs and self-worshiping racists who butchered millions of totally innocent people, including a very large number of Jews.”

    There should be doubt since there is no evidence to back up your accusations. The Nazis executed some people, but hardly millions. Allied bombing caused the starving in the camps and in the general German populace. If being “self-worshiping racists” is a crime, how can jews be included among the “millions of totally innocent people”?

    The Saker is prejudiced against Germans…

    J’accuse…

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  68. EugeneGur says:
    @jilles dykstra

    In combating this resistance the Germans were not zimperlich, they behaved radically.

    I truly admire you the Europeans – such a nice choice of words! Squamish the Germans were certainly not: to burn entire villages with all their inhabitants as they did all over Belorussia, to cut off breasts and throw into the mine shaft teenage girls who dared to post information about the events in the front in an occupied city, to starve to death a million people in the blockage, one has to be, well, radical.

    But for our Dutch friend the Germans aren’t homicidal maniacs but normal people. Tell you what – it’s not that the Germans were normal, it’s that the French and the Dutch and the rest of Europe, with few exceptions, were pathetic.

    This leaves us with one thing, Russian resistance, partisans, to a large extent organised by Stalin by dropping communist agents behind German lines, and providing them with weapons.

    Yes, that was our country, and the Germans were the invaders bombing and burning our cities and killing our people. So we defended our country and ourselves. It case you are wondering, that’s how normal people defend their country from invaders. This wasn’t your miserable “resistance” “the local Wehrmacht commander knew” about but the real one.

    And again note the choice of words – as if it was Stalin who did something bad. There were Stalin and communists in the picture – so, its OK to kill the Russians, all of them by any means necessary, and remain the “normal” people while accomplishing that worthy goal. Fascism of some sort is always present in the European psyche, isn’t it?

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    , @ploni almoni
    , @Wally
  69. @jacques sheete

    The definition of atheistic jews of themselves is something like ‘those who feel attached to the jewish culture’.

  70. @Miro23

    What enormous risk ?
    I fear everything went wrong on Sept 11, and yet it succeeded, through control of media, politicians, involvement of CIA, and whatever.
    That FDR deliberately provoked Pearl Harbour is now since decades without any reasonable doubt, but does the USA general public know ?
    Who followed the holocaust discussions here, a similar risk, but does also here the public know ?
    As to why Sept 11, the plan was to destabilise the whole ME, it succeeded to a large extent.
    If the destabilising of Europe was also planned, as a logical result, it would not surprise me.
    But possibly today Merkel falls, elections in Bayern.
    In her fall she may well topple the whole EU.
    But even if this happens, we still have the Merkel mass immigration disaster.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @jacques sheete
  71. @Steve Hayes

    Oh my God. Fantastic! How did you manage to land your spaceship on Earth without anybody noticing.

  72. yehway says:

    The Saker is doing his typical cake-walk with the jews. Trying to convince them to be good rational citizens instead war-mongering maniacs lead by the God of Chaos and War [Yahweh].

    Let’s do the jews a favor–and change the term antisemitism [most ashkenazi jews are no more semitic than I am] to antijudaism–that should be a much more appropriate description–lest we wrap Islam in with Judaism–and fine ourselves living out Albert Pike’s prescient nightmare of semitic obliteration and the ensuing WWIII:http://libertyforlife.com/nwo/albert_pike.htm.

    This whole thing regarding the jews goes back to the pre-biblical times–the enmity between Issac’s two sons Israel [gentiles] and Esau [jews]–and more recently the dozens of expulsions, from various countries, since 1240 AD. I would suggest that your readers listen to some of John Lamb Lash’s on Yahweh’s chosen [Xenosh].

    With these people it’s all or nothing: Either we [gentiles and jews] bend over–or the Great War to end all wars is right around the corner.

  73. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @jacques sheete

    The New Elitism of Jewish domination is even more unequal and unfair than the Old Elitism of Wasp domination. After all, Anglo-Americans made up a huge part of America. So, Wasp elites were representative of large part(the majority well into the 20th century) of America. In contrast, Jews are only 2% of America, and that means Jewish Elite Rule is really about domination of the 98% by the 2%.
    Jewish powerites will flatter themselves by saying their power is used for the good of all Americans and all peoples around the world. Really? Just ask the Palestinians. In fact, Jewish power makes US support Zionist oppression of Palestinians. And Jewish power uses US power to subvert Russia, Iran, Syria, or any nation hated by Jewish globalists. Also, Jewish Power shuts down BDS movement in the US. Also, Jewish power favors the network of Jewish oligarchs in Las Vegas, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and Hollywood concentrate and coordinate their profits for the Tribe. And the ONLY reason Jewish ‘progressives’ push for Mass Immigration-invasion is to increase Diversity among goyim so as to play divide-and-conquer over them. Notice Jewish globo-homo power does NOT push for non-Jewish immigration to Israel…. even as they demean Hungary and Poland for wanting to maintain their ethnic, cultural, and territorial integrity.

    Even though the power has passed from Wasp elites to Jewish elites, the former Wasp elites carry on with the charade of White Power even though they take their orders from the Jewish Bosses. Why? Because as long as they obey the New Jew Bosses and keep with the PC Narrative, they are given a seat at the table. Clintons and Bidens and Bushes can have a seat at the table as long as they sing hosannas to Jews and Israel while turning up their noses at Deplorables.
    So, we have Wasp politicians signing on to Wars for Israel and promoting Hate against any people Jews don’t like: Palestinians, Russians, Iranians, Syrians, etc. Also, cucky Wasp toadies kinda like the idea of ‘White Privilege’ because, despite its anti-white rhetoric, it gives the impression that Wasps still have the Top Power. Thus, Wasp comprador elites(who suck up to Jewish Power) can play at being magnanimous and ‘inclusive’ of non-whites and helpful to Holy Holocaust Jews even though, in actuality, they are just toadying up to Jewish Power that uses the smokescreen of ‘white privilege’ to hide the reality of Jewish Dominance.

    • Agree: Miro23, renfro
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  74. peterAUS says:
    @EugeneGur

    Good post.

    I guess you could be onto something here:

    ….so, its OK to kill the Russians, all of them by any means necessary, and remain the “normal” people while accomplishing that worthy goal….

    As for

    Fascism of some sort is always present in the European psyche, isn’t it?

    it is. Why not? Not all fascists had/have/will have that grudge against Russians. Mussolini wasn’t so keen on going East.
    Franco, Salazar, Vargas, O’Duffy…..?

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  75. @Sir Launcelot Canning

    Jews pioneered much of modern psychotherapy, and the popular culture they generate assumes that ordinary Americans have some familiarity with the concept.

    So what do psychotherapists tell us to do for good mental health? Let go of the past; accept people unconditionally, regardless of the imperfections that we all have; and live in the moment.

    But what do Jews do in practice regarding the things they really care about? They obsess over their history of persecution, especially the Holocaust; they find fault all the time with white people; and they worry constantly about the rise of another Nazi movement led by Literally Hitler.

    Jews really need to follow their own psychotherapists’ advice and get over themselves.

  76. Agent76 says:

    Jun 6, 2017 America’s Reign of Terror: A Nation Reaps What It Sows

    The U.S. government is creating the terror. It is, in fact, the source of the terror. Just think about it for a minute: almost every tyranny being perpetrated against the citizenry—purportedly to keep us safe and the nation secure—has come about as a result of some threat manufactured in one way or another by the U.S. government.

  77. @Steve Hayes

    Congratulations, dumbest comment on a thread full of them.

  78. Miro23 says:
    @jilles dykstra

    As to why Sept 11, the plan was to destabilise the whole ME, it succeeded to a large extent.
    What enormous risk ?

    I fear everything went wrong on Sept 11, and yet it succeeded, through control of media, politicians, involvement of CIA, and whatever.

    All I’m saying is that there’s a learning curve concerning the fakery of 9/11.

    On the day of 9/11, everyone (excepting a few specialists) accepted the Arab terrorist story with airliners crashing into and demolishing high rise buildings. These one or two specialists knew that aircraft impacts and jet fuel fires could never bring down these buildings, but no one else knew that. Personally, I didn’t have the slightest doubt about the MSM account, and it was only 8 years later that I stumbled on the fact that another high rise (WTC7) collapsed that day, and it wasn’t hit by an aircraft. It only had some minor office fires (check the video) and strangely didn’t appear in the 9/11 Commission Report . Then with some research one thing led to another, and it all became a lot clearer.

    My impression is that despite ” control of media, politicians, involvement of CIA, and whatever” there’s now a considerably higher public awareness that the “Collapse by Fire” story is a fabrication. There’s a greater openness to other explanations, and accelerating awareness of Zionist/Israeli involvement.

    Any serious look at events shows Zionist activists in critical enabling positions, and makes them the prime suspects. Also, the operation was way beyond the capabilities of the Saudis.

    The enormous risk for US Zionists/Israelis, is that with rising public awareness this same public will turn on them to revenge for this day of mass murder of Americans, regardless of the talking heads in Washington and the MSM with their cries of Antiemitism.

    • Replies: @Agent76
    , @jilles dykstra
  79. @peterAUS

    I am waiting,waiting waiting,………………………….I cannot take this suspense anymore.
    Its you who has to tell me!!!!
    When you will start issuing grades for commentators????

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @peterAUS
  80. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    In a nutshell, it seems unaware people are angry with the migrant-invaders of Diversity Invasion, whereas as aware people are angry with Jewish globalists for promoting migration-invasion and Diversity to create divide-and-rule scenario in the West.

    Unaware people are upset with the symptom. Aware people are upset with the cause behind the symptom.

    Unaware people hope to ally with White Jews against the Invaders of Color. Aware people see that Jews are encouraging the Invaders of Color to inundate the West.

  81. Che Guava says:
    @Svigor

    I was reading last week about Rabbinical Judaism, mainly because I always have serious doubts about references to Jesus as ‘Rabbi’ in some modern translations of the N.T.

    Since rabbinical Judaism did not exist until it later emerged as an anti-Christian cult, i am unable to see how those translations can be accurate.

    Svigor, one pertinent point from my reading, sorry, forget the source, but to paraphrase

    ‘With the fall of the temple, there was no focus for worship. The re-focus was on Jews as such, as objects of worship.’

    Note, the source is better expressed, but I have accurately paraphrased it.

  82. Agent76 says:
    @Miro23

    A very informative comment and just share these with the Truth deniers.

    Sep 5, 2016 9/11 Suspects: Rudy Giuliani

    Mayor Giuliani oversaw the illegal destruction of the 9/11 crime scene and is criminally liable for the deaths of hundreds of emergency workers.

    September 07, 2016 September 11, 2001: The 15th Anniversary of the Crime and Cover-up of the Century “What Really Happened”?

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/september-11-2001-the-15th-anniversary-of-the-crime-and-cover-up-of-the-century/5544414

  83. Che Guava says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Ilyana.

    He is a blockhead, but will also (to a limited extent) argue for his ideas, so you may try a more direct post next time.

  84. The US government attacked its own people on that day. No-one else.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  85. @jilles dykstra

    ” There is also no doubt in my mind at all that the Nazis were genocidal maniacs and self-worshiping racists who butchered millions of totally innocent people, including a very large number of Jews. ”

    I wonder on what this no doubt is based.

    I, too would like an answer to that. It is no doubt based on bullshit, but I’d like to read his take on it.

  86. Graukopf says:

    That Jewish Hollywood went to war on behalf of the U.S. ( or do I have that backwards) by producing anti German/Japanese propaganda films is not questioned by anyone. PBS made a salutory documentary about it, recognizing thier vital part in defeating the forces of “evil” The problem for those who want to continue positing that the Jews were intentionally mass murdered by Germany, is that:
    1. There is little proof other than Jews own testimony
    2.Jews had and continue to have a near monopoly on the mechanisms of mass propaganda
    3. Jews today use the holocaust narrative
    to stifle criticism to their great advantage in many ways
    4. It is commonly understood that to
    openly question ANY aspect of this narrative is to commit professional suicide

    All of which suggests that if it hadn’t happened as (((they))) say, they had both the means and the motive to invent it, and the ability make the world go along with it.

  87. @jilles dykstra

    That FDR deliberately provoked Pearl Harbour is now since decades without any reasonable doubt, but does the USA general public know ?

    Sadly, the answer to that has to be, “no!”

    Whenever I’ve mentioned it I’ve been attacked as a “conspiracy theorist.” The great mass of Americans has been so thoroughly brainwashed that one can’t even think of beginning to fight it. All one can do is stand in awe of it.

    Bring something like that into a discussion, and people react as if they’re genuinely afraid of you.

  88. @Anon

    Already used up my “Agree” button. You speak the truth!

  89. @obwandiyag

    The US government attacked its own people on that day. No-one else.

    Well yes, but on orders from their bosses.

  90. @George F. Held

    George, he obviously doesn’t know the difference between the Nazis and the International Commies.

    He really ought to consider ideas such as this, unless of course he’s into discrediting himself as a masochistic moron.

    You protest, and with justice, every time Hitler jails an opponent; but you forget that Stalin and company have jailed and murdered a thousand times as many. It seems to me, and indeed the evidence is plain, that compared to the Moscow brigands and assassins, Hitler is hardly more than a common Ku Kluxer and Mussolini almost a philanthropist. If you will denounce the orgy of sadistic fury that has gone on in Russia in terms at least as violent as those you have applied to your political opponents for years past, then I’ll be glad to print your denunciation, and to hail you with joy as a convert to fair play.

    - H. L. MENCKEN Baltimore, letter to Sinclair Lewis, 1936
    The American Mercury, Vol 38, No. 150, June 1936, THE OPEN FORUM, pp vi- vii.

    http://www.unz.org/Pub/AmMercury-1936jun:4?Period=1936&Text=protest+with+justice&HitList=03548a2b519d922a1e0d1f871c9fa8c4

  91. peterAUS says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    When you will start issuing grades for commentators????

    Interesting question.

    Haven’t thought about that. Why? Something in female psyche? Or more personal. “Father thing”, perhaps?

    Having said that, I do have a sort of list:
    1. Commentators I seek here, follow, and read. Around “%5″.
    2. Commentators I don’t mind reading when come across their posts.Around “20 %”.
    4. Commentators whose posts I skim read . Around 30 %.
    5. The rest I don’t read/skip over.
    Makes sense?

    Obviously, you are 4.So, you can take that as a grade if you wish and makes you happy.
    Just trying to be a gentleman. Ladies first and such.

  92. Some notes; one should not be too lenient on jews, their crimes have been documented.

    At the same time, there’s plenty of jewish intellectuals dismissed outright by ignoramuses. Our half-blood host is one we should appreciate.

    I have learned, and you should too, from ludwig von mises, viennese jew, the fountainhead of austrian school of economics, carl menger the founder of the aforementioned, murray rothbard, one of the minds behind the resurgence of paleoconservatism, fused with anarchism, and sound historiography (revisionism), and who-whom approach to the political.

    There’s walter block with his defending the undefendable and siring scholars without giving a fuck about their politics, an admirable trait in this day and age.

    The current scions of this school culminate with modern catholics; hoppe, fusing the austranism-anarchism with hbd, or jeff deist, current president of the mises institute, giving voice to the cultural aspect of our struggle, same with bionic mosquito, a relative newcomer, making sense of the rich catholic heritage.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  93. APilgrim says:

    There are FAR MORE Right-Wing Christian ‘Zionists’ than anti-Semitics.

    50 MILLION ‘FRIENDS OF ZION’ WELCOME CHRISTIAN MEDIA SUMMIT, BY MIKE EVANS, Jerusalem Post, Opinion, OCTOBER 13, 2018 22:34, https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/50-million-Friends-of-Zion-welcome-Christian-Media-Summit-569324

    Earlier this month, the Friends of Zion Museum surpassed 50 million members on social media, making it one of the largest Pro-Israel platforms in the world.

    Today (10/13/2018) is Christian Media Summit, a major gathering of Christian broadcasters and journalists from all over the world. These Christian broadcasters are one of the keys to building bridges as well as creating friends for Israel and her people. As the Founder of the Friends of Zion Museum, a sanctuary of strengthening Israel’s relationships, I am honored to be leading them, connecting them to Israel and standing with them in the fight against anti-Israel forces.

    The Christian Media Summit will include some of Israel’s highest government officials. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Reuven Rivlin, Mayor of Jerusalem Nir Barkat and I will be speaking to these vital Christian broadcasters about how they can stand up for Israel on campus, online and in person.

  94. @Steve Hayes

    Most Jews are atheists. They are Jewish atheists. In fact, how could a Jew believe in God?

  95. Meteor says:

    Maybe some squads of Ukrainian Nazi’s could be of use and come into western Europe and clean up…..instead of fighting Russians on the new Eastern Front….

  96. I wasn’t born an anti-Semite, I wasn’t home schooled to be an anti-Semite, but events, facts, and common sense have made me who I am today, and that is an anti-Semite. It’s my right and privileged to be anti-Semitic, just as it is the right of jews to hate Christ, and look at all non jews as cattle, and less than.
    I don’t think I am going out on a limb in thinking; jews better be careful or they just may get what they wish for.
    The NY Times among other rags are endangering the lives of, dare I say, good jews.

  97. @ploni almoni

    He’s an idiot. I don’t think there’s any deeper explanation than that.

  98. @oscar67

    the Ukraine is being set up for destruction, by you guessed it the jews, for it is their preferred homeland, or new location. After all the desert van be tiresome.

  99. @Hardcore Libertardian

    Rothbard is one of my intellectual heroes, and von Mises was probably the greatest economic theorist of all time. Walter Block leaves a lot to be desired, however:

    Apart from the usual annoying paranoia, he’s essentially arguing that Jews should support Ron Paul because under a non-interventionist US administration, Israel would be free to engage in even more aggression against its neighbors! Rather strange position for a supposedly pro-peace “libertarian”.

  100. Anon[282] • Disclaimer says:

    Saker on the jews: huge Yawn

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  101. APilgrim says:

    The Israeli Fan Club in Conservative Christendom FAR outnumbers the number of Jews on earth. Quite Possibly outnumbering all the Jews who have EVER LIVED.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  102. Saker said “There is also no doubt in my mind at all that the Nazis were genocidal maniacs and self-worshiping racists who butchered millions of totally innocent people, including a very large number of Jews.”
    How did you get brainwashed? The Nazis were certainly more normal than the Americans who shot their POWs. A Russian officer told me that during the beginning of WW II he watched through binoculars and saw the Germans bury the Russian dead and fire a salute over them. Somebody calls you an Antisemite and you bend over backwards, eh? Good dog.

    • Replies: @wayfarer
    , @Bobolink
  103. @Wally

    Sorry, your reply is not particularly helpful. Repeatedly you claim that the numbers of 6 and 5 million are impossible so what numbers are you proposing in their stead? I would like to know. This is a legitimate question.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
    , @Bobolink
  104. wayfarer says:
    @ploni almoni

    Knew a number of WW II veterans, there was one from the 10th Mountain Division (“shock troops”) and another from the 442nd Infantry Regiment (“go for broke”), both of whom had absolute respect for German combat infantry.

    According to one veteran, the 10th Mountain Division did in fact execute German prisoners. As an order was once given to some grunts, “take them to headquarters and be back in fifteen minutes.” Those prisoners were led off, shortly after which gunfire was heard, with the grunts soon returning.

    In the core of my being, I have deep disdain for the heartless profiteers and aristocratic architects of human warfare.

  105. M Radant says:
    @Anon

    Jews need to be attacked and killed all over the world. Especially in the USA!

  106. M Radant says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    He’s a filthy joo, they all need to be wiped out!

    • Troll: Cloak And Dagger
  107. But the problem is that there are also those who, once they began having doubts about gas chambers or crematoria, then decided the entire narrative about the “Holocaust” was one big lie and that no Jews at all were targeted or murdered by the Nazis.

    One of the best articles I’ve read on anti-Semitism, but which unfortunately contains the above falsehood that anyone, including the most virulent holocaust denier, ever suggested that “no Jews were targeted or murdered by the Nazis.”

  108. @alexander

    …it is an extraordinary thing that “neoconservatives” ever came into existence.

    It would take a lot better writer than I am to explain it. but the only people who could have possibly pulled-off the neoconservative movement are Jews, who continue to be as successful today as they were in 2001.

  109. @exiled off mainstreet

    the historical evidence really supports the allegations about the organised Nazi murder of Jews,

    Disregarding Jew-owned, Jew-monitored, Jew-edited Wikipedia, please provide historical evidence supporting organized Nazis murder of Jews. Take all the time you need.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  110. Eckbach says:
    @nsa

    In the old English dictionaries “jew” is a verb.

  111. @Miro23

    When the majority of the US public “get” what really happened to the WTC towers, their Congressional representatives will have to choose between their base and AIPAC (commit to MAGA or MIGA).

    What makes you think that? With practically all Americans now understanding that the CIA murdered JFK, what have they done about it?

  112. Wally says:
    @exiled off mainstreet

    said:
    “While I am sure that the historical evidence really supports the allegations about the organised Nazi murder of Jews, I also know that the number of others murdered by the Nazi regime equalled or exceeded those who happened to be Jewish.”

    Are you really “sure”, or do you just faithfully believe?

    Please present this so called “evidence”, we are eager to see it. Recommended:
    ‘Holocaust Skepticism: 20 Questions & Answers about Holocaust Revisionism’ !! / now available: https://shop.codoh.com/book/456/469
    free .pdf: http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/HolocaustSkepticism.pdf
    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos: http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    http://www.codoh.com

  113. @Amber Dekstris

    Estimates by researches who have studied the issue vary from a low of 200,000 to a high of not more than 350,000. The 6 million figure is laughable at best.

  114. Wally says:
    @EugeneGur

    said:
    “Squ[e]amish the Germans were certainly not: to burn entire villages with all their inhabitants as they did all over Belorussia, to cut off breasts and throw into the mine shaft teenage girls who dared to post information about the events in the front in an occupied city, to starve to death a million people in the blockage, one has to be, well, radical.”

    LOL.

    Except there is no proof. Got any? Nope.

    Your twisted propaganda says more about you & the Tribe of Arrested Development (who BTW have claimed their fake 6M since at least 1823) than anything else.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @EugeneGur
  115. Wally says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Rothbard was indeed a figure of note:

    “Revisionism has the general function of bringing historical truth to a public that had been drugged by wartime lies and propaganda.
    Now revisionism teaches us that this entire myth, so prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is either completely untrue or not entirely the truth. If people should learn this intellectual fraud about Hitler’s Germany, then they will begin to ask questions, and searching questions, about the current World War III version of the same myth. Nothing would stop the current headlong flight to war faster, or more surely cause people to begin to reason about foreign affairs once again, after a long orgy of emotion and cliché.

    For the same myth is now based on the same old fallacies. And this is seen by the increasing use that the Cold Warriors have been making of the “Munich myth”: the continually repeated charge that it was the “appeasement” of the “aggressor” at Munich that “fed” his “aggression” (again, the Fu Manchu, or Wild Beast, comparison), and that caused the “aggressor,” drunk with his conquests, to launch World War II. This Munich myth has been used as one of the leading arguments against any sort of rational negotiations with the Communist nations, and the stigmatizing of even the most harmless search for agreement as “appeasement.” It is for this reason that A.J.P. Taylor’s magnificent Origins of the Second World War received probably its most distorted and frenetic review in the pages of National Review.

    The task of revisionism has been to penetrate beneath these superficialities and appearances to the stark realities underneath — realities which show, certainly in this century, the United States, Great Britain, and France — the three great “democracies” — to be worse than any other three countries in fomenting and waging aggressive war. Realization of this truth would be of incalculable importance on the current scene.

    For revisionism, in the final analysis, is based on truth and rationality. Truth and rationality are always the first victims in any war frenzy; and they are, therefore, once again an extremely rare commodity on today’s “market.” Revisionism brings to the artificial frenzy of daily events and day-to-day propaganda, the cool but in the last analysis glorious light of historical truth. Such truth is almost desperately needed in today’s world.”

    - Righteous Jew, Murray Rothbard, Review of The Origins of the Second World War, 1966

    http://mises.org/daily/2592

  116. @anarchyst

    True. Jews have never given a damn about Negroes, in fact they despise them. They used Negros as a convenient battering ram with which to push civil rights legislation banning discrimination based on race, religion, or national origin. Civil rights legislation actually set blacks back by 30 years while benefitted Jews more than anyone else.

  117. Wally says:
    @obwandiyag

    Indeed, the acronym ZOG, Zionist Occupied Government, fits the description of “the US government” rather well.

  118. Anonymous[316] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    before getting equal rights during the 19th century jews were persecuted, for nearly two thousand years.

    True, but they were persecuted for a reason. After more than 2 thousand years, what we have here is an equivalent of a 100+-time divorcee complaining that all the women in his life were somehow wrong, deluded and unworthy of his attention.

    It’s kinda’ amazing that he’s still roaming our streets unmolested. Every woman in his past has been raped, killed or abused – but the (((MSM))) is telling you otherwise. In (((their))) story, those women have been misled into protecting themselves and their own.

    A) Nationalism, Democracy and sovereignty are (((bad))) – unless it’s non-white – and especially Jewish.

    B) Racial group strategy is (((bad))) – unless it’s non-white – and especially Jewish.

  119. @Miro23

    It took me three years to accept the unthinkable: the USA government deliberately murdered some 3000 of its own citizens in order to get a pretext for war.
    Then the inevitable question, how could our saviour from Hitler have become an evil regime ?
    And I found out that indeed Sept 11 was ‘the new Pearl Harbour’, what PNAC of AEI wanted.
    Would there have been a WWII without FDR ?
    Not, is my idea now.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  120. APilgrim says:
    @Carroll Price

    Carroll Price, is most likely, a Muhammadan.

    Few others are that stupid.

    We should DEPORT ALL Muhammadans, Post Haste.

    • Troll: Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @annamaria
  121. APilgrim says:
    @Amber Dekstris

    However you asked the question to someone who appears to be a low-IQ, lying, Muhammadan.

    And you will NOT receive any satisfactory reply.

  122. APilgrim says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    There are MORE ‘Jew Lovers’ in the USA than ‘Jew Haters’.

    Irrational Hatred for Jews, (mostly by Muhammadans), is cancelled out by Irrational Admiration, (mostly by Conservative Evangelical Christians), for Jews.

    IMHPO

    • Replies: @nsa
  123. Anonymous[316] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Yawn, indeed.

    Personally, I have no idea why a guy who’s so obviously compromised, subjective and emotionally stubborn should be acknowledged as an analyst of any kind. It’s perplexing TBH.

    His own website’s comment section is a heavily-censored graveyard of epic proportions. It’s difficult to find an “intellectual” less prepared to face any kind of criticism. It’s beyond sad.

  124. APilgrim says:

    George Soros, George W. Bush, Barack Hussein Obama, HIAS & Communist Church Charities imported MILLIONS of ‘Jew-Hating-Muhammadans, into Western Civilization.

    Western Civilization approaches COLLAPSE, under the BURDEN of these Muslims.

    Muhammadans should (AGAIN) be expelled from Western Civilization.

  125. Bobolinky says:

    If a contribution to history is not in some way revisionist, what is the point in writing it?

  126. Bobolink says:
    @Amber Dekstris

    TV host Larry King once spoke of seven million.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  127. Bobolink says:
    @ploni almoni

    Is he referring to “genocidal maniacs and self-worshiping racists” like John Rabe?

  128. nsa says:
    @APilgrim

    The very common phrase “jew ‘em down” captures the popular culture’s schizo hatred / admiration for the relentlessly self-serving tribe. Around here, WalMart is referred to as “JewMart”….encapsulating the same toxic combination of hatred and admiration in the popular psyche. Most decent people who come in actual contact with jews eventually learn to hate them………including the chrissie zio useful idiots.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  129. @SolontoCroesus

    You left out The Saker’s cognitive dissonance.
    - If the prisoners were being intentionally starved to death, why weren’t the guards, who had the same rations, being starved to death?
    - If Auschwitz-Birkenau were massive industrial plants manufacturing war materiel, what benefit would there be in starving the prisoners who were making the materiel?
    - If they were intentionally starving people, how is it that there were so many babies, who were born at camp hospitals, that survived, and survived without brain damage caused by malnutrition?
    - If the Nazis were mass murderers, why were more French killed by the Allies during their invasion of France than in the entire German occupation?
    - If the “Nazis” hated Jews, then why was a commemorative medal struck for Nazi-Zionist co-operation? https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5072424,00.html

    The list is very long, but the kicker is that, according to Jewish sources, the pre and post WWII Jewish population numbers showed an increase in the number of Jews.

    https://20thcenturytruth.wordpress.com/jewish-population-records-before-and-after-wwii/

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  130. @peterAUS

    You “yupped”:

    I just believe that most of their victims were either murdered by the SS Einsatzgruppen

    The alleged “murders” committed by the SS Einsatzgruppen includes the massacre at Babi Yar, where 100,000 were “murdered” and there were fountains of blood gushing up months later. Even if I believed that fairy tale, let’s set aside the numbers and the drama. The Einsatzgruppen were tasked with locating not-in-uniform combatants. For the previous 200 years, the “rules of war” accepted that combatants were supposed to be in uniforms. Those not in uniform were spies, and could be shot on the spot. Additionally, other civilians aiding and abetting the spies could also be shot. It wasn’t until the Stalinist show trial/kangaroo court at Nuremberg that what they had done became a crime. Just one of many ex post facto “crimes” dreamed up at Nuremberg.

  131. @Wally

    Interestingly, A.J.P. Taylor despised Hitler, yet was able to come to his conclusion.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @Wally
  132. @Bobolink

    TV host Larry King once spoke of seven million.

    He was momentarily confused and flipped the notion of Jewish lives

    Rabbi Yaakov Perrin, who stated without blushing that–
    ‘One million Arabs is not worth one Jewish fingernail…’

    Therefore, 7 million = 7 Jews.

  133. @jilles dykstra

    Like Woodrow Wilson who gave us WW 1, a majority of FDR’s cabinet members and advisors were Marxist Jews, with the same holding true for every US presidential administration since, including Donald Trump who may have more Jews around him than any of the others. Which explains why, regardless of who is elected president, America’s domestic and foreign policies change little if any, and always for the worse.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  134. anarchyst says:
    @Sir Launcelot Canning

    Anne Frank’s family was involved in “black marketeering” and was not the “innocent jewish family” hiding out from German troops. In fact, they made loads of shekels supplying the market with stolen and purloined goods…typical jewish behavior.
    Anne Frank’s “diary” is a fraud, portions of it being written with a ball-point pen, not invented till after the conclusion of WW2.
    Otto Frank swindled the co-writer and publisher out of his deserved shekels for getting the book out in print…more typical jewish behavior.
    Anne Frank died of typhus, while her relatives who were also interned lived out their lives well after WW2.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  135. EugeneGur says:
    @Wally

    Except there is no proof. Got any? Nope.

    My dear friend, besides that silly website of yours, there is also the real world. Come to Belorussia, and you’ll see places where the villages once stood, erased by the German Nazis, with their inhabitants killed. There is a memorial in one of these villages, Khatyn, which is well-known. Naive as I was, I used to think that was the only village to suffer such fate. As it turned out, there were more than 300 of them.

    The problem with executions like that, you can never kill them all. There are survivors and, consequently, witness testimonies. There were also neighbors, soldiers who liberated the area as well as war correspondent who documented these things. There are miles of documentaries and volumes of witness testimonies as to how “nice” the German Nazis really were. There are plenty of books and movies in the West available for you. If you choose to remain ignorant, it’s your choice.

    But you don’t consider the Russia or other peoples of the Soviet Union to be victims worthy of recognition, do you? So, you dismiss all of this as propaganda and that allows you to stay comfortable in that narrow world of yours. Forgive me, Sir, for saying this but I have nothing but contempt for such position.

  136. @anarchyst

    If black marketeering is sufficient for deportation, one of my grandfathers could have been deported too.
    Under any rationing system there is black marketeering.
    Illegal slaughter of pigs, my mother once came from her parents in law by bicycle, when she stepped off the bike it fell backwards.
    This half sleughtered pig somehow she got from my other grandfather.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  137. @Curmudgeon

    A good historian ignores his feelings

  138. @Carroll Price

    Elisabeth Dilling, ´The Roosevelt Red record and its background’, 1936, Chicago

  139. @Wally

    It is not understood that professional history is being revised continually.
    A good example is Ceasar’s war propaganda against the Gauls, it was believed until archeology proved that the Gauls, also tribes living in what now is Germany, had highly developed cultures.
    Anyone interested should visit the Celt Museum in Halle Austria.
    Suppose they have a site.

  140. anarchyst says:
    @jilles dykstra

    As the German government needed “warm bodies” for the war effort, it would not surprise me that a smuggling of black marketeering charge could go a long way in making it possible to intern these “poor innocent jews” who were hiding from the German government.
    The Franks and their associates who were arrested got what what was coming to them. It is unfortunate that Anne Frank died, but that was the way it was…
    Regards,

  141. @EugeneGur

    ” There are miles of documentaries and volumes of witness testimonies as to how “nice” the German Nazis really were ”
    Such a pity that in the offical Dutch history of WWII, written by jew Lou de Jong, one finds just one or two thefts by German occupying forces, in ten or eleven volumes.
    The perpetrators were sentenced by German military courts.

    • Replies: @EugeneGur
  142. EugeneGur says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Such a pity that in the offical Dutch history of WWII, written by jew Lou de Jong, one finds just one or two thefts by German occupying forces, in ten or eleven volumes.

    Of that, I have not the slightest doubt, for I have read some of your “historical” publications about WWII. This tells more about the quality, or rather lack thereof, of the “official” Dutch history that about the real events.

    Besides, it might surprise you to learn that the area of the German Nazi operations, wasn’t confined by the Netherlands borders.

  143. @EugeneGur

    ” Come to Belorussia, and you’ll see places where the villages once stood, erased by the German Nazis, with their inhabitants killed. There is a memorial in one of these villages, Khatyn, which is well-known. Naive as I was, I used to think that was the only village to suffer such fate. As it turned out, there were more than 300 of them. ”

    Ever read a good book about partisan activity in Russia ?
    Stalin dropped communist agitators and weapons all the time behind German lines.
    In eradicating it the Germans did take drastic measures.
    Contrary to popular thought, in any case in WWII, resistance was illegal, reprisals were legal.
    Even in British military handbooks reprisals were allowed until 1948.
    Bogdan Musial, ´Sowjetische Partisanen 1941 – 1944, Mythos und Wirklichkeit’, Paderborn 2009
    Otto Weidinger, ´Kameraden bis zum Ende, Das SS-Panzergrenadier-Regiment 4 „Der Führer“, 1978, 2007, Dresden
    Milovan Djilas, ‘Wartime. With Tito and the Partisans’, London, 1980
    Karl Knoblauch, ´Zwischen Metz und Moskau, Als Soldat der 95. Infanteriedivision in Frankreich und als Fernaufklärer mit der 4.(F)/14 in Russland’, Würzburg 2007

    • Replies: @EugeneGur
  144. peterAUS says:
    @EugeneGur

    Pretty much.

    As for

    But you don’t consider the Russia or other peoples of the Soviet Union to be victims worthy of recognition, do you? So, you dismiss all of this as propaganda and that allows you to stay comfortable in that narrow world of yours. Forgive me, Sir, for saying this but I have nothing but contempt for such position.

    you give them too much credit.
    As Saker said

    ….folks who want to whitewash the Nazis and who would gladly parrot any inanity …

    There is a peculiar mindset there.

    As long as its tiny minority simply doing their online therapy, no prob.

    Besides, good to be aware that those types are among us. Say…..1 in 100?
    So,say in my neighborhood 1 or 2 of those.

    Good to keep that in mind. Not only for “I have nothing but contempt for such position” I am afraid. For, say, more…….how to put it…..active approach if/when necessary.
    I am sure you understand.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  145. peterAUS says:
    @peterAUS

    Having said all that in my previous post, the ….ahm…mindset…isn’t so much about ideology (or religion when we are on it).

    The opposite (or not so much at all ) side had, HAS, fair share of the same. Extreme left.
    The pretty much same attitude we can hear from Stalin/Soviet/Communist advocates/apologist side.

    While we are on religion we could mention all major denominations here, with ease.

    I just have a gut feeling that the bottom line, really, is that 1 % of us.
    Interesting number.

    That’s all nice theory. What matters is practical, of course. Just feels that “taking care” of 1 % shouldn’t be a problem in any organized society. Should be easy and fast if…if done in time.

    Those numbers tend to rise quickly if not “solved” at the very beginning.

    Makes sense?

  146. @Jett Rucker

    Successful religions attach themselves to successful cultures for their survival. Judaism attaches itself to the governments of successful cultures for its survival. Its use of antisemitism-ingroup outgroup morality-is to allow it to commit more egregious acts than would normally be acceptable.

  147. @EugeneGur

    No occupying army tolerates partisan activity behind their lines. Suggesting, as you do, that German troops routinely razed entire villages for no reason is nothing more than post-war propaganda.

    • Replies: @EugeneGur
  148. @EugeneGur

    Judging by your earlier post, I assume you were subjected to WW 2 Soviet propaganda from a very young age. Chances are, you mistake the gas chamber myth, which is also Soviet propaganda as fact.

  149. @Beefcake the Mighty

    Walter block is certainly not perfect, i’d ignore his entire stance on israel, it’s rote to the core.

    There’s plenty to be aghast about his intellectual output, but he’s almost as prolific as rothbard, that comes with the territory. I’d say the same thing about unz.

    Btw i’ve listened to the first 6 minutes of the linked video, it was mostly sound.

  150. anon[349] • Disclaimer says:

    if for some reason a person or group of people don’t like me i usually find out its something i’ve said or done.

  151. @EugeneGur

    Stupid reaction, grandparents, parents, uncles, aunts, all experienced WWII.
    Two brothers of my mother were caught for forced labour in Germany.
    Both were ill, Huntingdon, though at the time this illness was not recognised, it was diagnosed as beginning multiple sclerosis.
    The younger brother went to where they already were concentrated, argued with the Germans, and came home with both of them.

  152. Erebus says:

    I would never presume to say that this “never” happened, but I personally don’t believe that this happened in any large numbers (this is why I consider the word “Holocaust,” which means “all/whole-burning,” a very misleading term). I also believe that the (quasi-obligatory) figure of 6 million is a vast exaggeration.

    The problem is the word “Holocaust” itself. When first propagated, the “Holocaust” narrative claimed that state mandated, systematically operated death camps, featuring gas chambers, diesel asphyxiations, mass executions / graves / cremations (and/or suitable variants thereof), were employed towards a state goal, namely Extermination.

    That original narrative has long since been stripped bare by the Revisionists, and indeed by many Holocaust proponents. Yad Vashem’s definition of the term changed accordingly, but is the new one really any sort of Holocaust at all?

    Here it is:

    “The Holocaust, as presented in this resource center, is defined as the sum total of all anti-Jewish actions carried out by the Nazi regime between 1933 and 1945: from stripping the German Jews of their legal and economic status in the 1930s`; segregating and starvation in the various occupied countries; the murder of close to six million Jews in Europe.”
    https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/holocaust/resource_center/the_holocaust.asp

    How much of YD’s defining “sum total” can be removed before the narrative dissolves into a laundry list of nasty things that happened to Jews in WWII?

    Reduce YV’s “six million” to 1M or 500k and there will of course still be a “sum total of anti-Jewish actions”, but what sort of “Holocaust” is that?
    By my lights, it joins the ranks of the countless “sum totals” of horrors that was visited on many peoples caught in the war’s crossfires, not least the Germans themselves.

    To speak of the Holocaust as a “sum total” is to strip it of its distinction as a historical claim. IOW, a “sum total” is equivalent to no Holocaust at all.

  153. @Erebus

    The “Holocaust” could apply to the sum total of the Jewish Conspiracy against mankind.

  154. @Erebus

    The problem is that the holocaust must remain the most horrible thing that ever happened on earth, see
    Ward Churchill, ‘A Little Matter of Genocide, Holocaust and Denial in the Americas, 1492 to the Present’, San Francisco 1997

  155. APilgrim says:
    @nsa

    The blogger/BOT/Troll nsa does not live in the real world.

  156. APilgrim says:

    There are several Jews who I believe should be hanged, for espionage, fraud, &/or treason.

    There are also several Lutherans, Presbyterians, Atheists, & Catholics as well as Caucasians, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Native-Americans. And I would be honored to ‘Spank-the-Pony’ @ each ‘necktie-party’. I also know several exemplary and many ‘so-so’ members of each group.

    So far, I have NOT located any admirable Muhammadans; but they probably exist.

  157. Wally says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Most revealing:

    “we’ve often fantasized about drawing up an indictment against Adolf Hitler himself. And to put into that indictment the major charge: the Final Solution of the Jewish question in Europe, the physical annihilation of Jewry. And then it dawned upon us, what would we do? We didn’t have the evidence.”

    - so called “holocaust historian” Raul Hilberg

    http://www.codoh.com

  158. @Curmudgeon

    Thank you, from one curmudgeon to Another.

  159. Corvinus says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    “the root cause of anti-Jewiism is Jews. Sothe only way to end the scourge of anti-Jewism is liquidate the Jews. Or everybody else. Clearly, the Jews have chosen the latter course. And who are we to blame them?”

    Given your flair for the melodramatic, which is indicative of a soy boy, and your knack for showcasing nude Jewesses on your website, I surmise that you are being sarcastic. Otherwise, someone who advocates the destruction of an entire group of people, yet receives sexual gratification as a result of Jewesses bustiness, needs serious and significant psychological counseling.

    As far as anti-Semitism is concerned, along with the other “isms”–racism, sexism–the meaning has been lost due to the machinations of the Coalition of the Fringes, Left and Right, by which The Saker is an integral member.

  160. @Corvinus

    Don’t all gentiles purchase what Jews sell, including dirty pictures of Jewesses who make up a significant number of the female performers in adult movies?

    Aren’t many gentiles using Jew-owned or Jew-invented things like FACEBOOK even if they profess a dislike for Jews?

    On this site one gentile wrote about Jews and then finished up with a Simon and Garfunkel quote.

    It is schizophrenic.

    Jews do one thing well. They seem to invent a supply for some demand.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  161. Anon[109] • Disclaimer says:

    As far as anti-Semitism is concerned, along with the other “isms”–racism, sexism–the meaning has been lost due to the machinations of the Coalition of the Fringes, Left and Right,

    Unadulterated bullshit.

    The meaning of anti-Semitism, if it has ever had a legitimate meaning (its getting increasingly difficult to tell given the obvious and deeply hostile mainstream Jewish political machinations), has been wholly compromised by the decades long (at least) political abuse of he term by the Jews themselves.

    Citing specific organizations that have contributed to this isn’t even necessary, because the phenomenon is near-universal to include from Jewish political orgs that sit at the highest levels of Jewish politics.

    The Jews are not some magic and just-Right Wing survivor group. The Jews are a deeply manipulative and highly internationally active ethnic group , with a large and aggressive communist contingent who is as deeply ethnocentric as their Right, who fights as hard as it can to not get blamed for anything and to suppress all true competitors: even in their own nations.

    The Jews shall not condemn nor lament the loss of meaning of the political isms. The Jews invented most of those concepts as weapons against the out-group, and have been primarily influential in molding any evolution in their meaning. If you’d like specifics, they are available.

  162. @Corvinus

    The resident cuck is late to the party.

  163. annamaria says:
    @APilgrim

    Chill out, APilgrim.

    — This is your beloved Jewish State arming neo-Nazi thugs: https://therealnews.com/stories/israel-is-arming-ukraines-blatantly-neo-nazi-militia-the-azov-battalion
    – Israeli thugs are the best friends of Ukrainian banderites — ask Israeli citizen Kolomojsky, the main benefactor of Ukrainian neo-Nazi.

    – And this is your pro-rapist/murderer-Leo-Frank ADF tacitly supporting the revival of Nazism in Ukraine: “How the Israel Lobby Protected Ukrainian Neo-Nazis” https://www.alternet.org/world/how-israel-lobby-protected-ukrainian-neo-nazis

    “If passed, Conyers’ amendment would have explicitly barred those found to have offered “praise or glorification of Nazism or its collaborators, including through the use of white supremacist, neo-Nazi, or other similar symbols” from receiving any form of support from the US Department of Defense.

    Despite their stated mission to combat anti-Semitism and violent extremism, the ADL and Wiesenthal Center refused to support Jeffries and Conyers’ proposal.”

    – You see, APilgrim, the Jewish Power always understands realpolitik, whether it is the Jewish support for banderites or denial of Armenian genocide.

  164. annamaria says:
    @EugeneGur

    You may be right, but do you seriously intend to ignite sympathy for the murderous prison guards of Gaza Ghetto and the bloodthirsty American ziocons? People had enough of Shoah-business profiteering and its disrespect towards the memory of the victims of WWII to take Jewish whining seriously.

    If you want to discuss the WWII atrocities, then you should mention the roots of the WWII. What was the role of American Jewry in initiation of the WWII?

    And, closer in time, what was the role of American Jewry in initiation of the ongoing slaughter in the Middle East?

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @EugeneGur
  165. @annamaria

    Senator Hollings in a 2004 speech stated that Bush jr promised AIPAC the war on Iraq if he got the jewish votes.
    Miraculously, the ‘new Pearl Harbour’ that PNAC of AEI wanted, did happen.
    About destabilising the ME, I do not file anything, but the plans seem to have been developed in Israel.
    If the destabilisation of Europe by mass migration was part of the plan, it would not surprise me, my suspicion increased by recent statement of Soros ‘that Europe is lost without mass immigration’.
    I interprete his words as ‘Soros’ intended Europe, a USA clone, cannot be realised without mass immigration, the existing cultures in Europe must be destroyed’.

  166. APilgrim says:

    Blogger annamaria is quite the stupid beotch.

    I neither praise, nor condemn Jews in general.

    I do condemn Muhammadans, Communists, & Fascists & all their works & ways.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  167. This is all B. S,
    War itself brings out bestiality in best of people.
    There was case in Malvina’s when beloved English commander was killed by Argentinians in combat.
    Than when the Argentinian unit surrendered, English did executed them to the last man.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  168. EugeneGur says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Contrary to popular thought, in any case in WWII, resistance was illegal, reprisals were legal.

    So, what you are saying is that if someone is trying to rob you, rape you, or murder you, it’s illegal to resist? And then a cop comes along and punishes you if you do? What kind of warped mind could come up with something like that? Truly, you European mentality is incomprehensible to normal people.

    Every German soldier that set foot on our soil was an enemy to be fought against by any means necessary – in the front, behind the enemy lines, in occupied cities and villages. That is how the Russian people treated all invaders since times immemorial, and that is why all the invaders met similar fates.

    And the Germans killed – everybody everywhere, not only those that resisted but anybody. For example, when they started the advancement at Voronesh, the first thing the Germans did was precision bomb a children park killing dozens of small children in the process. When they captured a portion of the city, they shot all the patients in the psychiatric hospital. Some legal reprisal.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @peterAUS
  169. EugeneGur says:
    @Carroll Price

    Suggesting, as you do, that German troops routinely razed entire villages for no reason is nothing more than post-war propaganda.

    I wish it were, my friend, by it isn’t, unfortunately. And if they did it for a reason – would it make a difference? I cannot imaging what kind of reason could possibly be for killing everyone young and old that’d make it OK in the eyes of any normal person.

    Yes, the Germans gave the “reason” – support for partisans, and most likely they did. Likely, every village supported partisans, in thought if not in action. So what? Who should’ve they supported, the occupiers?

    How hard is that to understand that the very presence of German occupiers on our land killing and destroying was a crime engendering all others?

  170. @EugeneGur

    International law was, maybe still is, do not know, quite simple: the occupier has to take care of the occupied, the occupied have to accept the rule of the occupier.

    ” Every German soldier that set foot on our soil was an enemy to be fought against by any means necessary – in the front, behind the enemy lines, in occupied cities and villages. That is how the Russian people treated all invaders since times immemorial, and that is why all the invaders met similar fates. ”
    I begin vaguely to remember that the USSR did never recognise international law.
    If so, USSR choice.

    We in the Netherlands, and in France and Belgium, acted otherwise.
    We did not suffer the consequences.
    ‘Cozy occupation’, as a USA officer of the Normandy invading forces, said.

    As to how the Russian people treated invaders, they did not.
    Read L.N. Tolstoy, ‘War and peace’, 1869, 1978, Harmondsworth.

    And you obviously know nothing about the armies of Russians, three million, from memory now, that fought on the German side against Stalin, after the war betrayed, sent to a certain death, by Churchill and FDR
    Nicholas Bethel, ´Das letzte Geheimnis, Die Auslieferung russischer Fluchtlinge an die Sovjets durch die Allierten 1944-47’, 1975 Frankfurt am Main, ( The last secret. Forcible repatriation to Russia 1944-7, London, 1974)
    Henning von Vogelsang, ‘Die Armee, die es nicht geben durfte, Russen in deutscher Uniform und ihre Rettung in Liechtenstein’, 1995 Ulm-Kissleg

    The word Hiwi also seems unknown to you, Hilfs Willige, ‘willing to help’, Russians who cooperated with the German troops in Russia, as interpreters, cooks, washing women,whatever.

  171. Corvinus says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    “Don’t all gentiles purchase what Jews sell, including dirty pictures of Jewesses who make up a significant number of the female performers in adult movies?”

    Actually, it’s not that high a number as you think as far as producers and performers.

    “Aren’t many gentiles using Jew-owned or Jew-invented things like FACEBOOK even if they profess a dislike for Jews?”

    Assuming that indeed the people who use Facebook have that dislike for Jews. Methinks you are projecting.

    “Jews do one thing well. They seem to invent a supply for some demand.”

    If true, then that would mean white men and women are easily swayed and duped. So much for their alleged high IQ and high time preference.

  172. peterAUS says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    War itself brings out bestiality in best of people.

    Something like that.

    There was case in Malvina’s when beloved English commander was killed by Argentinians in combat.

    Falklands, school at Goose Green. A lieutenant, platoon Officer Commanding , 2nd Battalion, Parachute Regiment.

    Than when the Argentinian unit surrendered, English did executed them to the last man.

    No.
    There was a local truce, miscommunication, misunderstanding and the lieutenant was shot and killed. The truce was broken, fighting resumed, Paras assaulted, overrun Argentine position and killed most of them.Some Argentine (infantry) escaped falling back into Goose Green settlement.

    The Argentinians in the settlement surrendered day later and were, after the hostilities ended, repatriated to Argentina.

    All that well documented and publicly available.
    For those willing to know it, of course. Takes time and effort, though, so unlikely, apparently.

  173. annamaria says:
    @APilgrim

    I regret that you parents did not teach you good manners.

    You have been consistently a defender of the Jewish State. Your visceral hatred for non-Jews is disgusting.

  174. EugeneGur says:
    @annamaria

    You may be right, but do you seriously intend to ignite sympathy for the murderous prison guards of Gaza Ghetto and the bloodthirsty American ziocons?

    I don’t get the connection. What do what I said has to do with “prison guards of Gaza Ghetto and the bloodthirsty American ziocons”? I was talking about the people of the Soviet Union , not even necessarily Jewish, being killed by the German Nazis. True, the Jew were killed first but the others very often soon followed.

    The subject of the Jews being deliberately targeted during WWII has nothing whatsoever to do with the present day Israel and its policies. For the record, personally, I despise the Israel’s behavior and don’t for a second think that the suffering of the Jews during the war is any excuse for it.

    However, disapproval of Israel should not be transformed into approval of the Nazis’ practices. On the contrary, the two act in a very similar way. So, if you don’t like one, why should you like the other?

    • Replies: @annamaria
  175. annamaria says:
    @EugeneGur

    Point taken. My response did not do justice to your post.

  176. @EugeneGur

    ” German occupiers on our land killing and destroying was a crime engendering all others? ”
    But did they kill and destroy ?

    Germany fought the Red Army, Hitler attacked three weeks before Stalin’s planned attack, as Russian archives show:
    Bogdan Musial, ‘Kampfplatz Deutschland, Stalins Kriegspläne gegen den Westen’, Berlin 2008

    A truly great man, Stalin, the Molotov Ribbenrop deal, the occupation of E Poland, the Katyn massacre, the Russian war crimes:
    Alfred M. de Zayas, ´Die Wehrmacht-Untersuchungsstelle, Dokumentation allierter Kriegsverbrechen im Zweiten Weltkrieg’ , 1979, 2001, München

    Then, how Red Army officers behaved towards their own soldiers
    V.L. Kondratjev, ‘De schande van Rzjev’, 1997 Amsterdam (Iskupit krovju, Znamka, december 1991)

    And then, after the war, the genocide on all those Russians who fought on the German side against Stalin
    Nicholas Bethel, ´Das letzte Geheimnis, Die Auslieferung russischer Fluchtlinge an die Sovjets durch die Allierten 1944-47’, 1975 Frankfurt am Main, ( The last secret. Forcible repatriation to Russia 1944-7, London, 1974)
    Quite interesting what
    Colin Thubron, ‘In Siberia’, Londen, 1999
    found about the camps where those deported died.

    If anyone in human history was a monster:
    Hellmut Andics, ‘Rule of terror, Russia under Lenin and Stalin’, New York, 1969 (Vienna, 1967)
    Milovan Djilas, ‘Gesprekken met Stalin’, George Urban, ‘Gesprek met Milovan Djilas’, Bloemendaal 1991 (Conversations with Stalin, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1962)
    Edward Radinsky, ‘Stalin’, 1996, London, Amsterdam

  177. @EugeneGur

    Since most, if not all German troops involved in the razing Russian villages are now dead, you would probably have to ask American veterans of Vietnam and Middle East wars what their motivation was for doing the same. My guess is that it happens on both sides in all wars, bringing to mind a favorite quote: “The difference between war criminals and war heroes is which side they’re on when the war ends.”

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  178. @Carroll Price

    ” Since most, if not all German troops involved in the razing Russian villages are now dead, ”
    What makes you think that German troops razed for fun ?
    They had more urgent things to do.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All The Saker Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.