The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTed Rall Archive
Will Clinton Democrats Vote for a Progressive Against Trump?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

History, they say, doesn’t so much repeat. It rhymes.

The campaign for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination appears to be an exception. Once again, the contest appears to be coming down to a choice between a “centrist” establishmentarian corporatist with institutional backing (Joe Biden) and a left-leaning populist progressive (Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders) preferred by Democrats, of whom 3 out of 4 voters self-identify as progressives.

In 2016, the Democratic National Committee smooshed their thumbs all over the scale, brazenly cheating the insurgent progressive Sanders so they could install their preferred choice, the right-leaning Hillary Clinton. They won the battle but lost the war. Fewer than 80% of Democrats who supported Bernie in the primaries voted for Hillary in the general election. Disgruntled progressive voters — especially those who sat at home on Election Day — cost her the race.

Who’s to blame for President Donald Trump? Democrats have been arguing about this ever since.

Centrists call Bernie’s backers sore losers and say leftists are myopic beyond understanding, untrustworthy supporters of a man who never officially declared fealty to the Democratic Party. Why didn’t progressives understand that nothing was more important than defeating the clear and present danger to the republic represented by Trump?

Progressives counter that after decades of dutifully falling in line after their candidates fell to primary-time centrist-favoring chicanery — Ted Kennedy to a sleazy last-minute change in delegate rules, Howard Dean to a media-engineered audio smear, John Edwards to censorship — the party’s sabotage of Bernie was one crushed leftie dream too far. Democrats, progressives say, had to be taught a lesson. The left isn’t a wing; it’s the base. Anyway, who’s to say that Trump is so much worse than Hillary would have been? At least Trump doesn’t seem to share her lust for war.

The fight for the Democratic Party matters because it informs dynamics as well as the strategic logic of the current primary clash. At this writing, pollsters are calling it a three-way race between Biden, Warren and Sanders, but this campaign is really a repeat of 2016: Biden versus (Warren or Sanders).

(If Warren or Sanders drops out, it’s a safe bet the surviving progressive receives the exiting contestant’s endorsement and his or her voters.)

Democrats tell pollsters they care about electability, i.e., choosing a candidate with a strong chance of defeating Trump. But who is that? Biden or Warren/Sanders?

In current theoretical head-to-head matchup polls, Biden beats Trump by 12 points, Warren wins by 5, and Sanders bests the president by 7. But it’s a long way to November 2020. At this point, these numbers are meaningless except to say that there’s a credible case for any of the top three as viable challengers to Trump.

2016 clearly illustrates the risk of nominating Biden: Progressives probably won’t vote for him. Some might even defect to Trump, as did a substantial number of Bernie voters in 2016.

ORDER IT NOW

If anything, Biden is even less appealing to the progressive base than Hillary was. Clinton offered the history-making potential of a first woman president and a sharp mind; Biden is another old white man, one whose repeated verbal stumbles are prompting pundits to wonder aloud whether he is suffering from dementia. Assuming he survives another 14 months without winding up in memory care, Biden will probably lose to Trump.

If Biden secures the nomination, centrists will again argue that nothing matters more than beating Trump. I see no sign that progressives will agree.

The real question is one that nobody is asking: What if Warren or Sanders gets the nod? Will centrists honor their “blue no matter who” slogan if the shoe is finally on the other foot and the Democratic nominee hails from the left flank of the party?

There isn’t enough data to say one way or the other.

The party’s silent war on Sanders broke out into the open earlier this year. “I believe a gay Midwestern mayor can beat Trump. I believe an African American senator can beat Trump. I believe a western governor, a female senator, a member of Congress, a Latino Texan or a former vice president can beat Trump,” Jon Cowan, president of then right-wing Democratic organization Third Way, said in June. “But I don’t believe a self-described democratic socialist can win.” On the other hand, he is the “second choice” of most Biden supporters.

As Sanders stalls at the 20% mark, self-described capitalist Warren continues to receive more media coverage and, thus, increasing popular support. But would Bidenites show up for her in November? No one knows.

Progressives haven’t had a chance at the brass ring since November 1972, when George McGovern suffered one of the unfairest losses in American electoral history to a warmongering sleazeball who was forced to resign less than three years later over a Watergate scandal that had already broken out. It was a bitter conclusion to a campaign that was in many ways ahead of its time. McGovern wanted universal health care. Like Andrew Yang, McGovern proposed a universal basic income to lift up the poor.

Even after the party convention, centrist Democratic leaders like John Connally formed Democrats for Nixon, an oxymoron if there ever was one, to try to undermine McGovern’s candidacy. It’s hard to imagine their modern-day counterparts resorting to such brazen treason. More likely, they would withhold their enthusiastic support for a progressive like Sanders or Warren.

If Biden withdraws from the race — a real possibility, given his obviously deteriorating mental state and the long arc to next summer’s nominating convention — centrists will have to choose between four more years of Trump and atoning for the sins of 1972.

 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2020 Election, Democratic Party 
Hide 8 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Biden is a pedophile. Perfect for the true power behind the curtain. Let Biden defy the prop masters and his illicit activities with underage girls gets exposed. His mental state is to their advantage. Less likelihood exists that he come up with his own ideas

  2. Warren sounded good when she said “let’s break up the banks” but of course she sold out her economic common sense to the Dem’s corporate masters and had to embrace hard-core lefty identity politics as a poor substitute.

  3. wake up mr rall the democratic party is not monolithic and is in real likelihood of disintegrating over the next few years into 2 parties: the hillary clinton democrats (in reality part of the uniparty repubocrats) nad the progressive democrats who are obviously unable to swallow any longer the fascism that IS the uniparty.

    should trump be re elected i fully expect the democrats to split into 2 factions but still use democrat in the name in whole or in part.

  4. Anonymous[425] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s all so crazy. This is what goes by ‘hate speech’. Truth is now hate. In a way, it makes sense because truth hates falsehood.

  5. I once was a member of what we called the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party. I voted for McGovern and Nader and given the chance would have voted for Kucinich. I also liked Goldwater and Perot.

    All that was before the Democrats declared war on white people. Now I keep it simple. I vote a straight Republican ticket.

  6. The article is hilarious.

    Black turnout (or lack of it) is what doomed Hillary.

    It is not even discussed.

    Do any of these “political experts” actually look at numbers?

  7. Democrats have decided that Socialism is the future, I really don;t think most Americans want to emulate Venezuela.

    Trump will win re-election.

  8. Nixon may have been many things, but he was not a warmonger.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ted Rall Comments via RSS