The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTom Engelhardt Archive
Nick Turse: The U.S. Military Moves Deeper Into Africa
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If you’re a reader of TomDispatch, then you know something of real importance about this country that most Americans don’t. As an imperial power, there’s never been anything like the United States when it comes to garrisoning this planet. By comparison, the Romans and imperial Chinese were pikers; the Soviet Union in its prime was the poorest of runners-up; even the British, at the moment when the sun theoretically never set on their empire, didn’t compare. The U.S. has hundreds of military bases ranging in size from small American towns to tiny outposts across the planet, and yet you could spend weeks, months, years paying careful attention to the media here and still have no idea that this was so. Though we garrison the globe in a historically unprecedented way, that fact is not part of any discussion or debate in this country; Congress doesn’t hold hearings on global basing policy; reporters aren’t sent out to cover the subject; and presidents never mention it in speeches to the nation. Clearly, nothing is to be made of it.

It’s true that, if you’re watching the news carefully, you will find references to a small number of these bases. In the present Korean crisis, for instance, there has been at least passing mention of Washington’s bases in South Korea (and the danger that the American troops on them might face), though often deep in articles on the subject. If, to pick another example, you were to read about the political situation in Bahrain, you might similarly find mentions of the U.S. base in that small Gulf kingdom that houses the Navy’s Fifth Fleet. Generally, though, despite the millions of Americans, military and civilian, who have cycled through American bases abroad in recent years, despite the vast network of them (the count is now approximately 800), and despite the fact that they undergird American military policy globally, they are, for all intents and purposes, a kind of black hole of non-news. Don’t even think to ask just why the U.S. garrisons the planet in this fashion or what it might mean. It would be un-American of you to do so.

ORDER IT NOW

I must admit that, until I met Chalmers Johnson back at the turn of the century, I was a typical American on the subject. I never gave much thought to what he called our “empire of bases.” My own shock on grasping the nature of this country’s highly militarized presence across this planet led me to decide that, at least at TomDispatch, American basing policy would get some of the attention it obviously deserves. This initially happened thanks to Johnson himself; later to David Vine, author of a rare book, Base Nation, on the subject; and finally to this site’s own Nick Turse, who in recent years has been following the U.S. military’s global basing policy as it moved onto the rare continent that had largely lacked them: Africa. No longer. Today, he offers his latest update on the burgeoning set of bases and outposts that the U.S. military has been building or occupying and expanding there without notice, discussion, or debate, a network that will ensure we are plunged into the spreading terror wars on that continent for decades to come.

(Republished from TomDispatch by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Africa, American Military 
Hide 5 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Nice article.

    If you’re a reader of TomDispatch, then you know something of real importance about this country that most Americans don’t.

    Likely true if one reads, or thinks, or questions anything at all.

    Ignorance is evidently bliss, and ‘Merkins seem genetically inclined to wallow in it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /tengelhardt/nick-turse-the-u-s-military-moves-deeper-into-africa/#comment-1852514
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Agent76 says:

    Here is your sign. Sep 11, 2011 General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned – Seven Countries In Five Years

    “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. anon says: • Disclaimer

    Thanks for that. But I also think the Israeli lobby is at least as important as oil to explain America’s obsession with the middle east.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Svigor says:

    Well, you see Tom, there’s this Unholy Alliance between Zionists, the military-industrial complex, and the State. The Zionists who control the media agree to keep silent about American military hegemony, as long as it props up Zionism. The military-industrial complex agree to prop up Zionism, as long as they get American military hegemony. The State agrees to prop up Zionism and maintain American military hegemony, as long as the Zionist-Media-Military-Industrial complex keeps funding the ruling political class.

    It’s all very cozy.

    In a very real sense, we garrison the planet because garrisoning (around) Zion alone would look a bit odd, and because such a small mission would support a much less robust military and military-industrial complex than Zion requires.

    Thanks for that. But I also think the Israeli lobby is at least as important as oil to explain America’s obsession with the middle east.

    More. Domestic policy has really eased oil prices, concerns over future sources, but the Zionist-media-military-industrial complex rolls on.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Svigor says:

    In a way, supporting the Jews’ conquest of Palestine was a brilliant move by the western powers. Otherwise, Jews would still have no skin in the Great Game. With Zion always at risk, Jews will always be inside the tent, pissing out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tom Engelhardt Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Eight Exceptional(ly Dumb) American Achievements of the Twenty-First Century
How the Security State’s Mania for Secrecy Will Create You
Delusional Thinking in the Age of the Single Superpower