The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTom Engelhardt Archive
Nick Turse: The Pentagon Makes History the First Casualty
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Call me human. It turns out that I’m no better at predicting the future than the rest of humanity. If as a species we were any good at it, right now I would undoubtedly be zipping through the gloriously spired skies over my hometown, New York City, my jet pack strapped to my back, just as I was promised by those imagining the future in my youth. I’ve been an editor in the book business for almost four decades and I still wouldn’t put a buck at decent odds on my predictions about which books will make it. When it came to Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam, whose focus is American war crimes in Vietnam, I spent years assuring its author, Nick Turse, that in the America we both knew, the odds were it would promptly fall into the abyss where unnoticed books go to die. Mind you, I never had a second’s doubt that it would be a great book — but a great, ignored book was my best guess. Of course, as most readers of TomDispatch know, it hit the New York Times bestseller list.

It was published in January 2013 and it’s fair to say that my predictive inadequacies have been brought home to me in the most literal way every single day since. I’ve never had an experience like it. Because Nick is the managing editor of and, as today, often publishes his work at this site, it’s natural that people would often write him about his book care of TomDispatch. Nonetheless, in the last year plus I doubt a single day has passed without at least one such email, and often a slew of them, arriving at the site. Thirteen months and still going.


Sometimes book editors work their whole lives on manuscripts they think the universe needs to read and never quite see how the books they’ve shepherded into existence settle into our world, how reading them touches, affects, changes lives. It’s been a rare honor to be a sideline witness to exactly that through those emails. My role since publication has fallen somewhere between messenger boy and peeping Tom. I always at least glance at them, since from the subject lines it’s seldom initially clear what they are, and I have to say that they have been eye-opening. Many come from Vietnam vets, who want to thank Nick for documenting their war, for confirming their own experiences or those of their buddies. Some want to tell him stories — horrors, really — they witnessed, experienced, or committed more than 40 years ago as exceedingly young men in “Nam” and have been living with ever since. Often, by their own accounts, until writing Nick they have been incapable of confiding in a soul, including their own wives and children. There were also letters from those children, letting Nick know that, thanks to his book, they finally understood what their silent, unnerved, disturbed dads had gone through in lives shadowed by, or even cut short by, the pain of memories that remained unbearable and acts, witnessed or committed, that were worse.

If I didn’t admit that these have been moving private accounts to read, I’d be a liar. I’ve never quite seen anything like them, nor while working on the book did it ever cross my mind that such a thing might happen. The new afterword to the just published paperback of Kill Anything That Moves focuses on the emails, letters, and encounters that followed publication of the hardcover. Nick writes: “I had spent years painstakingly tracking down witnesses, victims, and perpetrators. Now, people with stories to tell were finding me.”

In his book, Nick has created a one-man Grand Guignol of the real American war in Vietnam. Admittedly, it’s not the sort of thing that countries like to commemorate when they hand out medals, pump up their populaces, or “remember” their wars. A series of visits Nick paid to a website billed by the Pentagon as a 50th anniversary commemoration of Vietnam makes the point well. (And by the way, 1962, the year chosen for the beginning of that commemoration, ludicrously enough, was the anniversary of nothing, neither of the end of the war and a staggering defeat nor of its beginning and the sad path ahead.)

(Republished from TomDispatch by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy, History • Tags: Iraq War, Vietnam War 
Hide 2 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. redwood says:

    The USA used chemical wepons in Vietnam, Laos & Cambodia. George Warmonger Bush said one of the reasons for going to war with Iraq was that Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons against his own people. Very few people in the media talk about the USA using chemical weapons in Southeast Asia, Korea and many other places

  2. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Mr. Turse trashes the American Soldier and his country by the use of dogged research combined with cohesive writing, poisoned by logical fallacy. He brings up an example of an atrocity, say, and then facilely tries to convince us that “everybody did it,” like a teenager trying to convince his parents to let him go to Woodstock. I admit that body count and attrition are not strategies consistent with the good of the population. However, were his theories of Vietnam taken to their logical conclusion, we should have wiped out the entire population of the former Republic of Vietnam more than once, and then where would we get our shoes and athletic clothing today? Did the millions of Vietnam veterans whom Mr. Turse did not showcase simply slack off on their atrocity quota, or perhaps is Mr. Turse misreading the higher meaning of what he puts forth?

    Mr. Turse has taken his shots at Vietnam veterans and veterans of more recent wars alike. While I do not doubt that some Vietnam veterans (and faux Vietnam veterans) may have found Mr. Turse’s book cathartic for reasons of their own, the nation moved beyond shouting “Babykiller!” at its returning war veterans decades ago. Brian DePalma’s near-identical movies on the same theme of American atrocities in two different wars played to ever-decreasing audiences. This is not because we seek to bury the truth, it is because we cannot get past the false boot-strapping argument that one or ten atrocities represent who we are or what we did as American Soldiers collectively.

    So ultimately, I believe that Mr. Englehardt’s prophesy that Mr. Turse’s book will fall into the abyss will be proven correct, though not for the reasons he offered.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tom Engelhardt Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Eight Exceptional(ly Dumb) American Achievements of the Twenty-First Century
How the Security State’s Mania for Secrecy Will Create You
Delusional Thinking in the Age of the Single Superpower