The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTom Engelhardt Archive
Andrew Bacevich: Rule Number One in Warfare: Know Your Enemy
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

It’s now more than 17 years later, years in which American commanding generals in Afghanistan repeatedly hailed the U.S. military’s “progress” there and regularly applauded the way we had finally “turned a corner” in the Afghan War — only to find more Taliban fighters armed with RPGs around that very corner. Finally, in the 18th year of the war, an American general — to be specific, Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — has come to a somewhat different conclusion. This, mind you, at a moment when the Taliban has taken control of more territory than at any time since they were forced from power by the U.S. invasion of 2001. His assessment also comes in the face of the worst casualties (“unsustainable”) for the American-backed Afghan security forces in memory (more than 28,000 deaths since 2015, according to Afghan President Ashraf Ghani). In response, Dunford has offered the shocking news that — get a grip on yourself here — the Taliban “are not losing right now, I think that is fair to say…” Hmm… give America’s top general credit for finally offering up the bad news, even if a few years late, with only a modestly optimistic spin on it. Believe me, in the twenty-first-century annals of the U.S. military, that passes for realism of the first order.

Today, however, TomDispatch regular Andrew Bacevich, author of the new book Twilight of the American Century, offers us a timely reminder of another American commander who, 14 long years ago, sensed that the country’s war on terror was not going well and was unlikely to end in any imaginable future — and just why that might be. As it happens, that very general has just been nominated by the Trump administration as the U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia. And what a moment to head for Riyadh! After all, only last week the CIA leaked to the Washington Post its conclusion that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, that land’s (dys)functional ruler, had personally ordered the brutal murder of one of that paper’s contributing columnists. On the subject, President Trump continues to shuffle his feet awkwardly. Stay tuned. The war on terror may just be revving up.

(Republished from TomDispatch by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. JLK says:

    What is our real strategic interest in being there?

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    , @MarkU
  2. Anyone below the rank of general making such observations would effectively torpedo his career. It’s long past time to cut and run from this quagmire that bleeds us of blood and treasure. Let the Chi-Comms sort them out.

  3. peterAUS says:
    @JLK

    What is our real strategic interest in being there?

    Again?!

    Becoming boring.

    Anyway…..:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard

    And, of course, making money for some people.

    • Replies: @JLK
  4. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    Is it a rule that anything published by TomDispatch since the 2016 Presidential election must give a pass to the White House politicians nominally in charge of the Washington Empire from 1/20/09 to 1/20/17?

    Equally annoying: Mr. Engelhardt wrapping each kiss to Team Red in his own, adding nothing but Progressive(tm) snark and creating parallel comment threads.

  5. JLK says:
    @peterAUS

    I read the book a long time ago. “Controlling Central Asia” doesn’t seem a compelling enough reason for the blood and treasure expended.

  6. MarkU says:
    @JLK

    “What is our real strategic interest in being there?”

    Someone else has already told you about the “Grand chessboard” angle. There is also the pipeline war aspect and the need for the CIA to get their black op drug money from elsewhere after their cocaine racket was rumbled. Probably there are other motives too, it is naive to believe in a singular motive for anything in politics.

  7. “The war on terror may just be revving up.”

    Laugh.

    Excuse my levity — but that last line struck me as very funny.

  8. Renoman says:

    Are you fellas blind, you are there for the smack and to be close to Russia when the big war starts. In short FOR the MONEY!

    • Replies: @AWM
  9. Stogumber says:

    Mr. Engelhardt is undecided if he shuns “the Empire” in general, or if he wants to return to the “good Empire” when the Democrats governed. This runs like a thread through his comments. But perhaps he simply needs to serve two different parts of his public.
    In any case it damages whatever message he has about Foreign Policy.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tom Engelhardt Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Eight Exceptional(ly Dumb) American Achievements of the Twenty-First Century
How the Security State’s Mania for Secrecy Will Create You
Delusional Thinking in the Age of the Single Superpower