The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTom Engelhardt Archive
Andrew Bacevich: Not So Great Wars, Theirs and Ours
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In case you hadn’t noticed — and it wasn’t exactly front-page news — America’s eighth war commander in Afghanistan (and keep in mind that we’re only talking about this country’s second Afghan War), General John Nicholson, is about to be history. Sometime in the coming months, the ninth, Lieutenant General Austin “Scott” Miller, who spent much of his career commanding Special Operations forces, will take over. The previous commanders included figures like generals David Petraeus and Stanley McChrystal, who made more than their share of news, and ones like Nicholson’s predecessor, General John Campbell or General David McKiernan (back in distant 2009), whom no one today is likely to remember. But they each had one striking thing in common. Whatever they did, whether they were commanding a few thousand American troops or more than 100,000 of them, and no matter what strategies they employed, they were invariably succeeded by another commander.

And let me add one more bit of news. The Taliban, our original enemy there (along with al-Qaeda), was driven from the last Afghan provincial capital it held early in 2002, just months after the U.S. launched its invasion of that country. Only a couple of weeks ago, almost 17 years after the “liberation” of Afghanistan, the Taliban took Farah, a provincial capital in the west of the country, for a day. They now control or maintain influence in as much territory — almost half of that country’s districts — as at any time since 2002. The capital, Kabul, is practically under siege and casualties nationwide are on the rise. And that’s just to begin a list of the “successes” of the mightiest military force on the planet against groups of modestly armed Islamic militants more than a decade and a half after the “successful” invasion of the country.

Now, a small warning (not that the U.S. military or politicians in Washington really need such a caution): after a mere 16-plus years in Afghanistan, making it the longest war in American history, it’s important not to jump to rash conclusions. For that, you would undoubtedly need a far more extensive set of experiences (18 commanders?). In the meantime, as TomDispatch regular Andrew Bacevich, author of America’s War for the Greater Middle East, suggests today, Washington’s war on terror simply stretches on into… well, infinity, without a new thought or a disconcerting question in sight.

(Republished from TomDispatch by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Afghanistan, American Military 
Hide 5 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[391] • Disclaimer says:

    Well it stands to reason that the generals are rotated in and out like the troops. There are so many of them that they all can’t get a piece of the war action otherwise.

  2. Why argue over WHERE TO KILL THEM? … I rather we carpet bomb Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Syria, … under ANY pretense … than to wait for them to storm the gates of Ellis Island.

    I want them GONE … men, women, kids…. yes, kids… because they grow up to be breeding Muslims. And breeding Muslims kill me and mine… given the chance.

    I don’t want to discern which, if any, are vanilla Muslims… let’s sort that out over there… not here.

    Again… kill em wholesale … under some pretense of war .. because as European diplomacy has shown us…. they are playing us for saps.

    It’s National Geographic meets the Old Testament folks….. Time to grow up.

    • Replies: @Iris
    , @Per/Norway
  3. Why do they hate us?

    They hate not for our lifestyle, not for our ‘freedom’, not for our beliefs.

    They hate us for our deeds.

    Until Zio-Washington is contained, is prevented from invading other sovereign states and slaughtering innocents with impunity, the chaos and blowback will continue.

    • Agree: Per/Norway
  4. Iris says:
    @gustafus21

    Above all, you need a good psychiatrist.

  5. @gustafus21

    bah bah bah sheeple talk, you need professional help.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tom Engelhardt Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Eight Exceptional(ly Dumb) American Achievements of the Twenty-First Century
How the Security State’s Mania for Secrecy Will Create You
Delusional Thinking in the Age of the Single Superpower