The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewTom Engelhardt Archive
Alfred McCoy: A New Age of Sea Power?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The rise and fall of empires has long been a story at the heart of history. Since the Europeans first burst out of their then-marginal region on wooden sailing ships mounted with cannons in the fifteenth century, the planet seldom has had a moment in which several imperial powers weren’t competing for supremacy. In 1945, that number was reduced to two and then, for what the Washington elite briefly imagined would be forever, to one. Now, as historian Alfred McCoy, author of In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of U.S. Global Power, describes in his vivid way today, we seem to be returning to an updated imperial version of the naval contests that began modern history so many centuries ago. The Americans, the Chinese, and in a more modest way the Russians are all bolstering their forces on the high seas in increasingly challenging ways.

But there is a catch. Two actually. It’s not the fifteenth century anymore. It’s not even an early-twentieth-century moment of dreadnaughts and battleships. The tale of imperial rise and fall is now taking place in a different context: the potential fall of planet Earth itself (at least as a reasonable human habitat). As a start, since the middle of the last century, all imperial confrontations, naval or otherwise, have taken place on a globe where any confrontation between major powers has had an apocalyptically loaded and cocked gun behind it. If you wonder what I mean, just think about the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 in which a naval face-off between the Soviet Union and the United States threatened to end life as we know it on this planet. Don’t for a second think that it couldn’t happen again.

But there’s a second cocked gun on Planet Earth these days and it goes by the name of climate change. In a sense, it’s the very opposite of the nuclear one in that the potential Armageddon would arrive not with the speed of the Roman god Mercury but in dreadful slow motion as the planet slowly heats; the melting of Antarctica and Greenland causes sea levels to slowly rise, imperiling coastal cities; fire seasons lengthen; droughts and extreme weather of every sort become the norm; water becomes ever scarcer; vast human populations are set in motion; and… well, you get the idea. The question is: on a planet already beginning to degrade, what exactly does it mean for a new power like China to “rise” or an old one to “decline”?

(Republished from TomDispatch by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: American Military, China 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Oh my! Another amalgamation of festering word turds by Tom which doesn’t link to the original article by a a worthy author.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Macon Richardson
    Amen, brother!
    , @Silva
    Why? Because you don't believe in climate change or peak oil?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. @a very SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle
    Oh my! Another amalgamation of festering word turds by Tom which doesn't link to the original article by a a worthy author.

    Amen, brother!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Silva says:
    @a very SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle
    Oh my! Another amalgamation of festering word turds by Tom which doesn't link to the original article by a a worthy author.

    Why? Because you don’t believe in climate change or peak oil?

    Read More
    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    Sure, I believe in climate change, especially as we continue on down a solar-minimum that will take the planet into the next leg down in the longer-term ice-age we are in. That 3 degrees C target will seem laughable by 2030.

    Oh, and Adiabatic-oil, baby!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. @Silva
    Why? Because you don't believe in climate change or peak oil?

    Sure, I believe in climate change, especially as we continue on down a solar-minimum that will take the planet into the next leg down in the longer-term ice-age we are in. That 3 degrees C target will seem laughable by 2030.

    Oh, and Adiabatic-oil, baby!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. TBW says: • Website

    Excellent article. Humanity is like an Ostrich, it has its head buried in sand.
    The real problems are not tackled while the always ego related agendas are
    pursued.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. DanC says:

    Puhleeeeze . . . … Is there actually anyone left who’s so exceptionally uninformed that they spout AGW bullshit uncritically on a fact-based news site like Unz Review?

    My dear Mr. Engelhardt, here are a couple of sober, very fact-based descriptions by competent, non-ideological scientists of what is wrong with AGW pseudoscience:

    Hopefully they will get you to start thinking about reality-based military projections.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tom Engelhardt Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Eight Exceptional(ly Dumb) American Achievements of the Twenty-First Century
How the Security State’s Mania for Secrecy Will Create You
Delusional Thinking in the Age of the Single Superpower