The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersSBPDL Blog
Those Vancouver Riots: The Difference Is Black and White
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Has anyone read where alcohol had a hand in aiding the Mahogany Mobs in Chicago? Perhaps alcohol is the reason Baltimore is investing curfew centers this summer? Can alcohol explain why Atlanta is becoming a police state this summer, in hopes of containing potential Mahogany Mobs (what the media calls “youth” or “packs of teens” is actually a Black-only “Flash Mob)?

The Great White North: Social Media and white people do ‘snitch’ you Maple Leaf wearing thug
The Great White North: Social Media and white people do ‘snitch’ you Maple Leaf wearing thug

Major cities throughout the nation are bracing for the type of violence being perpetrated in Chicago right now, by a group of people the media persistently refuses to identify with any racial information as to who is engaging in non-alcoholic fueled attacks on the general public.

By now, people should know that a purported large contingent of Vancouver hockey fans rioted when their beloved hockey team lost game seven of the Stanley Cup finals to Boston. Knowing that anti-Olympic protesters rioted in 2010, you might get a different picture on whom the rioters were.

The Vancouver mayor blames anarchists, and he could be right. The likely disreputable ally in disabling proper judgment from many of the participants in mob behavior is probably alcohol.
When you put on the “Black Goggles” for only a second, it all makes sense.

People need to know that I’m not excusing the behavior of these cretins; I’m a strong law and order type guy. But people who invest time, money and energy into following a sports team, only to see their team lose in game seven, after imbibing a plethora of alcohol, undoubtedly had their judgment impaired.

Can you excuse away Black criminality and those Black people who people who participate in Knockout King in St. Louis merely for the fun of it? Or those Black people who participate in Polar Bear Hunting? In police descriptions of the incidences of Mahogany Mobs in Chicago, alcohol consumption has never been mentioned as a probable cause for the attacks.

Recall that in Washington, that states supreme court recently overturned a murder conviction because the prosecution used racist language in describing the Black communities well-known aversion to ‘snitching’ out family, friends and racial confederates to the police. Better to have a killer running around then another brother in jail.

Here’s an article from The Atlantic that describes the problem:

In many Baltimore neighborhoods, talking to the law has become a mortal sin, a dishonorable act punishable by social banishment—or worse. Prosecutors in the city can rattle off a litany of brutal retaliations: houses firebombed, witnesses and their relatives shot, contract hits on 10-year-olds. Witness intimidation, they say, badly hampers their ability to fight crime, and it affects nearly every murder case they try.

Prosecutors in most major U.S. cities tell similar stories. Two years ago in Philadelphia, a drug kingpin was convicted of witness intimidation after he was taped threatening to kill those who testified against him. Five relatives of one witness in the case had already died, in a house fire that prosecutors believe was the drug lord’s doing. Last year in San Francisco, two gang members beat a murder rap after the state’s star witness turned up dead. Several years ago in Denver, a key homicide witness was sexually assaulted in what prosecutors believe was a “contract” attack designed to frighten him out of testifying.

Police and prosecutors have been contending with reluctant witnesses for decades. But according to law-enforcement experts, the problem is getting dramatically worse, and is reflected in falling arrest and conviction rates for violent crimes. In cities with populations between half a million (for example, Tucson) and a million (Detroit), the proportion of violent crimes cleared by an arrest dropped from about 45 percent in the late 1990s to less than 35 percent in 2005, according to the FBI. Conviction rates have similarly dropped. At the same time, crime has spiked. Murder rates have risen more or less steadily since 2000. Last December, the FBI voiced concern over a jump in violent crime, which in 2005 showed its biggest increase in more than a decade.

The reasons for witnesses’ reluctance appear to be changing and becoming more complex, with the police confronting a new cultural phenomenon: the spread of the gangland code of silence, or omerta , from organized crime to the population at large. Those who cooperate with the police are labeled “snitches” or “rats”—terms once applied only to jailhouse informants or criminals who turned state’s evidence, but now used for “civilian” witnesses as well. This is particularly true in the inner cities, where gangsta culture has been romanticized through rap music and other forms of entertainment, and where the motto “Stop snitching,” expounded in hip-hop lyrics and emblazoned on caps and T-shirts, has become a creed.

The metastasis of this culture of silence in minority communities has been facilitated by a gradual breakdown of trust in the police and the government. The erosion began during the civil-rights era, when informants were a favorite law-enforcement tool against groups like the Black Panthers. But it accelerated because of the war on drugs. David Kennedy, the director of the Center for Crime Prevention and Control at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, in New York, told me: “This is the reward we have reaped for 20 years of profligate drug enforcement in these communities.” When half the young black men in a neighborhood are locked up, on bail, or on parole, the police become the enemy. Add to this the spread of racialized myths—that crack was created by the CIA to keep blacks in their place, for example—and you get a toxic mix. Kennedy thinks the silence of many witnesses doesn’t come from fear, but from anger.

Now juxtapose this aversion to ‘snitching’ by Black people to the actions by Vancouver’s law-abiding population in the hours that followed the riot after the Stanley Cup game seven playoff loss:

Then, something happened which killed the buzz dead in its tracks: the Canucks lost to the Bruins 4-0. And, for the second time in franchise history, Canucks fans rioted after losing the 7th game of a Stanley Cup playoff. The first riot was on June 14th 1994 when the Canucks lost to the New York Rangers. Twenty years later, the scene was eerily similar. Angry and disappointed fans took to Vancouver streets, starting fires, looting from stores, and causing general havoc for hours after the game.

What’s worse? Vancouver was sure it had matured. Leading up to the game radio hosts, journalists, and fans all agreed: rioting wasn’t a risk this time. This morning, everyone is hanging their heads and wondering: is this Vancouver – a city with the emotional capacity of a toddler?

ORDER IT NOW

While news reports paint one picture of Vancouver, social media provides – if not a different image – a different perspective of the city. Within hours of the riots, pages popped up on Facebook to try and create a different kind of mob mentality: one to help. A campaign aimed to identify rioters attracted 20, 000 people in less than twelve hours. On it, users are encouraged to post pictures and video of rioters in hopes they can be identified. The wall reads:

“People need to be held accountable for their actions and face the consequences under any circumstances”

A similar Tumblr site titled the Vancouver Riot Criminals List is also trying to help police catch those involved.

Another Facebook page was created late Wednesday; it called for people to help with clean up. It reads: “Invite all of your friends! Let’s see if we can get Vancouver looking like a new city by noon Thursday!” The site’s copy is positive, affirmative and respectful of the needs of police to keep parts of downtown closed.

On June 15th, 2011 the online Vancouver and the offline Vancouver were vastly different. Which one was indicative of the city’s true identity? While the volume of followers on social media makes it tempting to vouch for the online community, Vancouver must acknowledge last night’s riots. Once is a blip. Twice is the beginning of a pattern. Perhaps, Vancouver’s biggest issue was that it refused to believe the riots could happen again. With ocean and mountains, Vancouver is a geographically stunning city. It is accepting and diverse. It’s easy to ignore the under belly. What is it that compels Vancouver residents to riot? To answer this, Vancouver needs to take a good look at itself.

But that look should include Facebook campaigns and Tumblr pages. What does a city do when its residents do the unthinkable? Well, it depends on the city. Some would get angry. Some would blame politicians. Others, however, would show strength in numbers – create Facebook groups and Tumblr pages whose 1000’s of followers vastly outnumber the few hundred troublemakers on the street.

All across the Western world, similar examples of Black people engaging in irrational behavior without alcohol to fuel their peculiar behavior are transpiring; in London, the majority of violent crime is perpetrated by the recent Black immigrants who comprise a growing percentage of the population though they were near zero percent only 70 years ago.

Civilization can only exist when those who commit crime are shunned – violently if they must be – and castigated to the fullest extent the law can provide. When police and government can no longer guarantee the safety of civilians, people must shame the laws inadequacies to ensure peace and stability.

Black people refuse to snitch; Vancouver citizens have utilized social media to find those responsible for the violence in their city:

Vancouver vigilantes have set up a website encouraging people to upload their photos of last night’s riot, in the hopes that other people will identify the worst offenders and report them to the police.

The idea is to get people to tag the photos using Facebook, and the let the cops take it from there.

There’s definitely no shortage of pictures, not just here, but on other websites and we imagine quite few people (like the setting a cop car on fire) will be getting visits from the Mounties in the next few weeks.

This summer, many American cities will see similar violence that Vancouver saw on June 15th. Alcohol will not be an ingredient in the violence – it has not been discussed as the a culprit or aid in instigating the Mahogany Mobs that plague Chicago – but the failure to properly identify those Black people engaging in thuggery will be.

Whereas whites use social media in the aftermath of the Vancouver riot to identity those who would bring shame to their city, Black people use social media to organize Mahogany Mobs, Smash and Grab attack, Polar Bear Hunts, and Knockout King games. Not an ounce of shame is lost in the process.

Their parents – more than likely, their mom – will excuse away their behavior and Black people will refrain from ‘snitching’ to ensure that miscreants go free to engage in Black mobbery again unimpeded.

(Republished from SBPDL by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Riots, Snitching 
Hide 54 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. If anyone by chance recognizes any of the rioters in Vancouver, contact the Vancouver Police at [email protected].

  2. They won't riot over their province/country and government selling them out, but they will riot over losing a game. What a sad world.

  3. I guess their pissed cause their parents gave them such dufus names.

  4. Paul…

    Sunday that will be celebrated by White people…by acknowledging "THEIR FATHERS"…will be a different day for black American…in more ways than one…

    Houston will have a FREE concent at Hermann Park…for Juneteenth…and people are allowed to bring chairs and coolers…(no restrictions to the contents)

    Here in Houston…we are in the MIDDLE of a FLIPPING huge heat wave…a HUGE drought and frayed nerves…

    I wonder if a SPARK will ignite? Hot heads, high temperatures, malt liquor and black celebration…

    May become interesting…however the good news is…the riots if they were to erupt are across the street from a tax payer trauma center…HA!

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    As these Vancouver riots show, any race of people can commit crimes. However – as SBPDL points out – when whites riot, they are overwhelmingly CONDEMNED by their fellow whites. The facebook group that Vancouverites started is proof of their determination to make sure these hooligans are brought to justice.

    I invite any of you trolls/DWLs/apologists to find a comparable example of black people being this proactive in hunting down their own criminals.

    Remember the OJ Simpson verdict. I guarantee you if Timothy McVeigh or Ted Bundy were acquitted, white people would not be jumping up in celebration the way blacks did for the juice.

    When your motto is "stop snitching,"are you surprised that your neighborhoods have become slums?

  6. "Stop Snitching" in our communities is like taking a "Stop Weeding" approach to lawn care. If you let the weeds survive, the entire lawn will become overrun by them.

    -Black Guy.

  7. Black Guy, "snitching" is merely a pejorative black term for what is properly confronting a criminal and reporting a crime. For all the talk about "community" and it "takes a village," blacks do not enforce any commonly accepted civilized standards of behavior. If there existed any sort of parenting or nurturing of children, rather than the indifference/neglect/abuse which is the norm today, perhaps black children might learn standard (i.e. White European or civilized) norms of behavior acceptable in a modern Western country, rather than growing up to be conscienceless psychopaths as so many do.

    Children are not born sinless and civilized; standards of behavior must be taught and modeled, and love/good parenting demands that misbehavior be corrected and, when necessary, punished. This includes reporting such behavior to proper authorities when warranted. My children have been told since they were young not to expect me to ever lie for them, or for them or defend them when they have committed a crime. Actions have consequences, and rights demand responsibilities. Blacks reject both consequences and responsibilities, and demand complete license without reproof. Many Whites, such as the majority of posters here, have had enough of this. So take your "snitching = weeds" analogy back to a primitive, tribal society where it belongs.

  8. Newspapers and other media outlets purposely not reporting the race of criminals is nothing new. Go to http://www.shorpy.com/node/10466 and scroll down from the picture and read the paragraphs below "Washington Confidential".

    As long as you are on the Shorpy site, check out some of the photos of our great cities that were taken prior to negro-infestation.

  9. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I've just found out about this riot, but I don't think it's a completely negative event. Yes, a sports loss is a stupid reason to riot. Yes, I see from the videos that quite a few rioters seemed to want to be seen as "badass", getting their photo snapped before burning cars. Yes, I regret the property losses, especially the poor slobs who had their cars destroyed.

    But, in spite of the above, I am heartened by the fact that at least some of our people have the balls to be disobedient, to act forcefully on their feelings. Being by nature law-abiding puts us at a disadvantage when so many others aren't, and are attacking us in so many ways.

    Consider this: it may be that thousands of Whites in Vancouver now feel more courageous, or entitled to act forcefully for what they want. We need more of these kind of people.

  10. "We need more of these kind of people."

    We do not need more whites who behave like negroes.

  11. This is off topic but worth noting.

    McDonalds received $203 million in bail out money – according to the Fed bailout data released in December.

    That may explain 365Black.

    http://www.vegsource.com/news/2010/12/mcdonalds-got-millions-in-bail-out-money.html

  12. I read in an article about the riots that the rioters were chanting, "Fuck the Police," which, as we all know, is the title of a famous NWA song.

    Canadian wigger anarchists. Brrr…

  13. What's with the new term 'Flash Mob'? It was called 'Wilding' in the 1980's. I wonder what term the media used in the 1880's.

  14. I'm seeing a lot of internet comments along the lines of "oh man now we're as bad as Americans now". Yeah, that's exactly what you see in your typical American inner city riot, a bunch of whitebread "Americans".

  15. @ FoxSnooze…

    did you see this perp?

    Deshawn James Chappell??

  16. @ ANON 11:50

    in the 1880's they were called…

    "the enemy"

  17. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "We do not need more whites who behave like negroes."

    Sure, it was unfocused hooligan behavior. But you have missed my point. It's the willingness to break rules, the assertiveness I am looking at. The rules which are part of our oppression will need to be broken. I didn't think White Americans or Canadians had that in them anymore. And I really don't care if they get the idea from Negroes.

    Who is going to defend you and your family if all Whites are afraid to defend themselves, or God-forbid actually strive for our collective rights out in the real world, if even White police are afraid of being called names?

  18. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "But you have missed my point. It's the willingness to break rules"

    Look, I understand your point, I just disagree.

    I see it as nothing more than senseless anarchy and lawlessness, with no intelligent goal whatsoever. I expect such criminality from negroes, I hold whites to a higher standard.

    I respect your right to see things differently.

  19. I know some Canadians. They're not as squishy as many suppose. There's definitely a large contingent who see through the bullshit.

  20. Anon @ 10:05,

    Sorry, but I disagree.

    Lowering one's standards is never a boon. NEVER.

    What you perceive as "white" fear is simply civilized people behaving in a civilized manner. However, you should not misinterpret civility to mean that we are not ready, willing and quite able to defend ourselves against thugs and thuggery.

    I cannot conceive of a circumstance that would cause me to become "Shequanda the Horrible" acting like savage. I do not, and would not go looking for or creating trouble – I'm white.

    However, should circumstances get "out of hand", in a very civilized manner I would unholster my weapon and defend myself with little or no fanfare.

  21. So when black people riot following sporting events (or break the law), it's 'genetic'.

    When white people riot after a sporting event (or break the law), it's alcohol induced, cultural, outside of the 'norm'…? It's okay because a favorite team of the rioters lost.

    They rioted in Vancouver in 1994, as well (apparently this is a bit of a pattern).
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Il3UlV2ars

    When white people living in a country with a scant amount of blacks riot, they are acting like 'Negroes'…?

    Example: http://www.praguepost.com/sports/8876-soccer-hooligans-ignite-riots.html

    Why do you make bullshit excuses? Why not accept that white people are just as capable of acting a fool and breaking the law as everyone else? Only you may 'see it less' since about 1 in 11 whites are poor and 1 in 4 blacks are poor.

    The problem is that your logic is shallow, beyond it's obvious flaws. I cannot believe you wrote this meandering screed in an attempt to invalidate the 'bad' in bad white behavior.

    What are you going to defend next?

    This?
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/16/tennessee-woman-rape-murder-toddler_n_877698.html

    This?
    http://www.ajc.com/news/dekalb/man-accused-of-bestiality-966598.html

    This?
    http://www.buffalonews.com/city/article448699.ece

    This?
    http://www.seattlepi.com/default/article/Oak-Harbor-toddler-needs-surgery-after-rape-1409083.php

    This?
    http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/arrest-in-sex-assualt-on-elderly-woman/?ref=nyregion

    This?
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20066925-504083.html

    I don't make excuses for crime, why do you? Just because they're white?

    How's that cognitive dissonance feeling today?

    By the way, most people in prison are there for drug-related offenses and a large amount who've committed felonies were under the influence of a chemical substance.

    http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/dcf/duc.cfm#jailinmates

    http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/us0309web_1.pdf

    http://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/2000/usa/Rcedrg00.htm#P54_1086

    You have no idea what 'blacks' are on when they break the law. Noting the previous statistics, odds are they were under the influence. And is that not your argument in this piece? That law breaking is 'understandable' if one is chemically impaired?

    Wow, you are a fucking moron!

  22. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    The problem with this article is what it's comparing. 'Snitching' against the corner drug dealer in the black inner city neighborhood, where you may have to actually testify in court, may bring you or your family harm. Compare this to what is mentioned in the article regarding the riots in Vancouver which is videos that are run on media sites so anyone can anonymously call the police with information regarding possible suspects in the riots.

    I am a black man who is more than upset with the 'no snitching' mentality in our inner cities. We are at many times, our own worst enemy. But, keep in mind, EVERY DAY blacks give 'snitch' on suspects from everything from robbery to murder. It's one of the most effective tools the police use to apprehend a suspect.

    This article makes it appear that blacks do it one way, and whites do it another, and that's not entirely true.

  23. "So when black people riot following sporting events (or break the law), it's 'genetic'."

    Yes, it's genetic, negroes are uncivilized, like animals.

    Diarrhea, aren't you banned?

  24. Dreko: Read this very slowly and pretend that it's your kind, libtard special education teacher telling you a story.

    Those of us who frequent this site on a regular basis are far more familiar with statistics about race and crime that you think we are. We know that your examples of White people fucking up over a lengthy period are outdone daily by the bruthas who end up on Thug Report. We learned about the Color of Crime from The New Century Foundation via American Renaissance and from Occidental Dissent. We know Blacks commit 90% of the interracial violent crime and we know that 90% of their victims are White.

    We also notice that when Blacks riot and do a billion dollars worth of damage that their defenders write articles in every liberal newspaper that explain that it was really not their fault. Have you seen any stories that mollycoddle those dumbass canooks who broke some windows and trashed a few cars? I haven't.

    Did you see any prominent White race hustler preachers run to their side to defend their actions? Did the National Association of Canadian White People sue anybody on their behalf? Did the Canadian Civil Liberties Union step in to make sure that the perps were properly pampered during their arrests?

    The reason it's big news when Whites behave like Blacks is that it rarely happens.

    I personally would not have argued that the canooks' behavior was due in a large part to alcohol consumption. I have over-imbibed at many a sports or music event and I have never rioted. The blame for drunken misbehavior still falls on the shoulders of the people who poured too much booze down their throats.

    The bottom line is this: The 13% of Americans who are descendants of Sub-Saharan semi-humans riot more, murder more, rape more, assault more and rob more than the 65% of Americans who descended from European humans. I have read statistics that indicate that the numbers are about the same in Canada.

    So, remember that your audience here isn't nearly as gullible as your soft-headed circle of friends who erroneously believe that you are smart and well informed.

  25. @Desiree,

    "So when black people riot following sporting events (or break the law), it's 'genetic'.

    When white people riot after a sporting event (or break the law), it's alcohol induced, cultural, outside of the 'norm'…? It's okay because a favorite team of the rioters lost."

    A black complaining about a double standard? Will wonders never cease.

  26. Wow. You completely nailed it. And for those complaining about "whites snitching," they can go to hell as it was not the internet vigilantes who betrayed these criminals, it was the criminals that betrayed their city. Any loyalty to the rioters that attacked their own city should be rescinded.

  27. Hello all,

    As a long time Vancouverite I am no fan of hockey, but a big fan of this blog! What happened at these riots was truly atrocious, but like Paul and others have pointed out, the VAST majority of us utterly condemned what was going on. And, far from being typical, the last time a debacle of this magnitude occurred was in 1994, under the same circumstances—a Stanley Cup final which was lost in the final game. (Told you I don't like hockey!)

    The Facebook and social networking sites are starting to have the desired effect. As of this posting, it has been reported that about a half dozen of the main rioters have voluntarily turned themselves in to the police.

    http://www.theprovince.com/sports/rioters+turn+themselves+police+upping+investigation+team/4965041/story.html

    The story also mentions how the Vancouver Police Department (VPD) website was overwhelmed and crashed because of the OVERWHELMING amount of viral evidence being sent in.

    Also, as of early the following morning, volunteers were out in force to help clean up the mess.

    http://www.theprovince.com/sports/Vancouver+unites+clean+shattered+city/4960109/story.html

    I’m not trying to portray us as saints or anything. We have plenty of problems here, not the least the result of a government forcing multiculturalism down our throats at every opportunity. However, TNB is not (yet) one of them.

    Nonetheless, I would like to apologize to the fine Americans here for those smug “we’re getting to be just as bad as them!” type of comments. The ranks of Those Who Can See are growing here too. And every time I get one of those “I’m sure glad I live up here and not down there!” remarks, I always remind that person to not get so smug. The U.S. should serve as a bit of a heads up for us north of the border as to what’s going to happen here—soon–if we continue on this destructive trajectory. After all, we’re all in this together.

    Thanks for reading, have a good July 4th!

    W.J. aka “Vancouver Guy”

    p.s. good game, Boston!

  28. Whites acting like savages ARE savages and need to be put down!

    Blacks acting like savages ARE savages and need to be put down!

    What's the problem here. It's really just simple decorum, when you have uncivilized criminality you just nip it in the bud, with what ever means necessary.

    Black/White really shouldn't be the main issue in this instance.

  29. "A black complaining about a double standard? Will wonders never cease."

    Thank you for acknowledging the double standard predicated upon horseshit pseudoscience. Kudos, "Bro".

    "Dreko: Read this very slowly and pretend that it's your kind, libtard special education teacher telling you a story."

    Blah.

    "We know that your examples of White people fucking up over a lengthy period"

    Wishful thinking. Those links were gathered from June 2011.

    "We learned about the Color of Crime…"

    You're quoting the Color of Crime? That has to be one of the most speciously rationalized pieces I've ever read. I adore their section on police bias, wherein they compare victim/witness perception of an offender to actual arrests made and then make the claim that blacks are basically under arrested.

    Uh, no. One should not compare something as nebulous as 'perception' with actual arrests. A negative difference in arrests compared with perception could simply indicate that the victim/witness' perception was incorrect. It's one thing to deny police bias but another to imply that blacks receive special treatment.

    The report's comparisons were just odd. They relied too much on the NCVS, which I think is terribly risky. It's a dubious report, primarily due to the very questionable extrapolations on their source data and obvious political bias. I am not doubting their numbers, just how they got to them.

    Forgive me if I roll my eyes at your mentioning of it. It's just really bad scholarship.

    I will hand it to them, though: they could NOT deny sentencing bias, even when 'controlling' for prior convictions.

    "We also notice that when Blacks riot…defenders write articles in every liberal newspaper that explain that it was really not their fault."

    Well, it's dishonesty to not acknowledge the obvious difference between rioting as a form of social protest and rioting because your team lost.

    "Did you see any prominent White race hustler preachers run to their side to defend their actions?"

    No one should defend the destructive actions of booze-addled idiots pissed their team lost.

    "The reason it's big news when Whites behave like Blacks is that it rarely happens."

    If it's big news to you, you live in a cloistered fantasyland. Last time I checked, European prisons were not empty.

    "The 13% of Americans who are descendants of Sub-Saharan semi-humans riot more, murder more, rape more, assault more and rob more than the 65% of Americans who descended from European humans."

    How rational. 'More' is easily explained by the fact that, in the US alone, 1 in 4 blacks are in poverty compared to 2 in 10 whites, and, globally speaking, white Americans and Europeans own exponentially more capital than black Americans and Africans. 'More', as already explained by virtue of poverty and lack of capital, is consistent even when comparing Eastern Europe to Western/Northern Europe and Japan to any shit-hole country in SE Asia.

    "So, remember that your audience here isn't nearly as gullible as your soft-headed circle of friends who erroneously believe that you are smart and well informed."

    'Gullible', in this direction, would be incorrect but you are gullible enough to cite the Color of Crime and be on a site and read books written about black people by a white in a cloistered whitopia who has had very little life contact with blacks.

    W.r.t 'soft-headed', there's a correlation between liberalism and high IQ. Your credibility is in the port-o-potty.

  30. Check up "Brock Anton" on facebook boasting about being maced in the riots.Hope "The Right" is "Maintain"ed on him.

  31. @Desiree,

    "Thank you for acknowledging the double standard predicated upon horseshit pseudoscience. Kudos, 'Bro.'"

    I didn't say it was a meaningful or truthful double standard, just that you, a black, were complaining about one, when the whole of Black Run America is predicated on racial double standards, in your favor. In fact, you could say that the right of blacks to complain about double standards when it suits them, despite the way whites are treated when THEY complain about double standards, is another hallmark of BRA and "black skin privilege" — a double standard about double standards, if you will.

    BTW, as someone else around here has been saying…aren't you banned?

  32. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "You're quoting the Color of Crime"

    The Color Of Crime is not only meticulously documented and 100% accurate, but it affirms what we have all witnessed our entire lives…rampant negro crime and anti-social behavior.

    Definitely required reading for all white people.

    "1 in 4 blacks are in poverty"

    This is a direct result of poor choices and atrocious, irresponsible behavior. Blacks throughout the globe have high illegitimacy, which leads to both high crime and high poverty.

  33. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "…in the US alone, 1 in 4 blacks are in poverty compared to 2 in 10 whites…"

    Sooooo…25% of negroes compared to 20% of whites? Are you implying that if "we" could somehow lower the percentage of negro poverty victims to 20%, the violence, etc, that negroes bring would fall to the level of same that whites bring??

    This negress is seriously delusional. But ain't they all?

    Joe

  34. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    How rational. 'More' is easily explained by the fact that, in the US alone, 1 in 4 blacks are in poverty compared to 2 in 10 whites, and, globally speaking, white Americans and Europeans own exponentially more capital than black Americans and Africans.

    25% v 20%. Did you do a Chi-square test to find the significance?

  35. "The Color Of Crime is not only meticulously documented and 100% accurate"

    Meticulously documented ≠ 100% accurate, FYI. I typically don't question statisticians' numbers and I've never denied that, all things considered, blacks seem to be breaking the law more than whites.

    No one should debate the 'what', just the 'how' and the 'why'.

    I questioned their (a) methodology and (b) their extrapolations based upon their methodology. Tangentially, I question the obvious level of bias in their analysis that affects their dubious conclusions.

    They couldn't rationalize away sentencing bias nor did they prove there was no police bias. They tried, though. Of course, we all now that this leads to blacks being more fully represented in the criminal justice system.

    "but it affirms what we have all witnessed our entire lives…rampant negro crime and anti-social behavior."

    If you live in the ghetto, I imagine so…

    "Definitely required reading for all white people."

    I suppose, if the goal is entertainment, not hard scholarship.

    "This is a direct result of poor choices and atrocious, irresponsible behavior. Blacks throughout the globe have high illegitimacy, which leads to both high crime and high poverty."

    There is a correlation between domestic instability and crime. This a given; all male inmates and female inmates seem to be from broken, impoverished homes. However, illegitimacy only increases the odds of domestic instability and, if the mother is young, poverty.

    As we all know, women are penalized for having children at inopportune times in their lives; additionally we live in a society wholly different than 50-60 years ago where an individual with a high school diploma could make at least a good, living wage. If all of this was not the case, I doubt illegitimacy → domestic instability → crime for poor people.

    "In fact, you could say that the right of blacks to complain about double standards when it suits them, despite the way whites are treated when THEY complain about double standards, is another hallmark of BRA and "black skin privilege""

    'Bro', blacks will no longer complain about double standards–such as the ones in this piece–when race-based double standards cease to exist. End them, end the 'complaining'.

    BTW, besides the 'racism' double standard–as in whites are the only ones who can be 'racist', which, personal biases notwithstanding, is true since racism is largely economic and whites hold enough economic and political power to affect race-based oppression (i.e. Apartheid)–what other double standards exist that penalize white people?

  36. @Desiree,

    "besides the 'racism' double standard–as in whites are the only ones who can be 'racist', which, personal biases notwithstanding, is true since racism is largely economic and whites hold enough economic and political power to affect race-based oppression (i.e. Apartheid)–what other double standards exist that penalize white people?"

    Well, the ones involving the banning of trolls, apparently 😉

    "blacks will no longer complain about double standards–such as the ones in this piece–when race-based double standards cease to exist. End them, end the 'complaining.'"

    You've got this weirdly backwards because it suits your argument at this particular moment, but otherwise this makes absolutely no sense. Negro logic spins round and round and round…

    "Snape" exhibited a similarly circular form of logical thought, but beyond that, he was definitely your most convincing creation. Now you aren't even trying….

  37. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "…BTW, besides the 'racism' double standard–as in whites are the only ones who can be 'racist', which, personal biases notwithstanding, is true since racism is largely economic and whites hold enough economic and political power to affect race-based oppression (i.e. Apartheid)–what other double standards exist that penalize white people?"

    Again. THIS passes for reason and logic by negroes, and is exactly why all attempts to reason with this sub-species, are pointless.

    Discrimination CAN BE economic; racism is a belief.

    "Apartheid", BTW, was awesome. Negroes were kept largely under control, and the country prospered. America desperately needs the same or a similar system, or there is no hope for its survival. Negroes simply cannot live amongst white people without their being kept completely under control.

    Joe

  38. "Again. THIS passes for reason and logic by negroes, and is exactly why all attempts to reason with this sub-species, are pointless."

    Indeed. And the hidden motivational factor causing rational argument to curve and circle back upon itself is, "Blame whitey."

  39. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Let's not appease the D disease. It's unrelenting and has many dark faces ( all puns intended ).
    Since Paul won't ban it, I suggest we stop feeding this flaming troll. Do not feed the beast, it depends on us for it's daily sustenance , we have far better things to do than to give any credence to it.

  40. The Africans(black and white or any other race) that immigrate to any country of the 2 American continents are always the best of the best of all types of immigrants.

    How come blacks that have been here from slavery have such high criminality and low IQ?It may be that we let them survive through BRA and letting them play victim to anything.

    Rather than worrying about "snitching",they had better learn that they're not in Africa where a lot of bad things happen and only the good get to emigrate out of there and get a better life.

  41. WHY CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?? Jesus.

  42. So you are telling me that rioting is not a black-only enterprise? Well, good to know. Thanks for the heads up, SBPDL.

  43. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "June 18, 2011 5:11 PM
    Spencer said…

    How come blacks that have been here from slavery have such high criminality and low IQ?It may be that we let them survive through BRA and letting them play victim to anything."

    You just answered your question. Maybe centuries of slavery, Jim Crow, and unfathomable poverty had something to do with it.

    How would you and your descendants fare if a bunch of Africans kidnapped you and enslaved you in Africa, forced you to lose your culture, your language, your religion, rapes your significant other at whim, breeds you for your muscles, and kills you when you show any sign of intelligence (e.g. literacy). You and your descendants will probably have large muscles but less intelligence, and will probably curse these "Niggers" for eternity.

    And then one day somebody tells you you are free to go, with no culture to call your own, except a Pidgin form of white culture, no education, no money, just barely clinging to humanity, nobody willing to hire you to do anything except being a sharecropper, aka rent slave, no vote and thus no political power, and somehow you are supposed to miraculously become a self-sufficient yeoman farmer? You can thank the white men for bringing this upon themselves.

  44. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    How would you and your descendants fare if a bunch of Africans kidnapped you and enslaved you in Africa, forced you to lose your culture, your language, your religion, rapes your significant other at whim, breeds you for your muscles, and kills you when you show any sign of intelligence (e.g. literacy).

    You are absolutely correct!
    It is all the fault of African slave traders who sold their fellow africans as slaves!
    Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability, and I want you to know that we are with you, hatta al-nasr, hatta al-nasr, hatta al-franken

  45. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Anon @ 8:09

    More tired shit.

    First off, "our" negroes weren't kidnapped – they were SOLD to "us" by THEIR OWN, WONDERFUL, SAVAGE, BRETHREN. Facts suck, huh?

    Further, if you want to blame whitey for American negro failure, you are obliged to explain negro failure (and lack of intelligence) everywhere else on the friggin planet. Jackass.

    Joe

  46. Diarrhea alert – June 19, 8:09AM !

    She posts under Anonymous now. I really thought she was banned from posting here, I recognize her truculent style, she's terminally obsessed with this blog.

  47. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    @ Anon.,June 18, 5:11 You whined: "How would you and your descendants fare if a bunch of Africans kidnapped you and enslaved you in Africa, forced you to lose your culture, your language, your religion, blah, blah…."
    OK…, SO HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THE FACT THAT THERE ISN'T ONE…NOT ONE…SUCCESSFUL & PROSPEROUS NEGRO SOCIETY/CIVILIZATION ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH????

  48. Indiana Black Expo's Summer Celebration features a hair styling competition??? Black kids can't read or write and this is this is what they offer?? How about a hotwiring a car competition, seminars on how to clean your grillz and how not to trip while your pants sag??? What a bunch of idiots. Follow this foaming at the mouth doggy, dirtydog1776 on Twitter.

  49. Diarrhea, which part of "Seek Professional Help!" do you not understand??

  50. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    "unfathomable poverty"

    It's not "unfathomable". In fact, the poorest negroes in America have a higher standard of living that the world's negro population.

    Poverty results from poor choices, primarily the choice to have out-of-wedlock children. Blacks in poverty are there because of their own irresponsible behavior.

  51. I gather that the Canadians are busting these shit-for-brains punks. Some water- polo-scholarship-Olympic-team-shoo-in allowed his stupid self to be caught on camera/phone/ipod/whatever while lighting a rag stuffed into a cop car's gas tank. These Whites clearly come from the thin left hand side of the bell curve. Only their skin is White.

  52. Dumb Canucks.It is "Maintain the Right" not maintain the riot!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Kersey Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?