The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersSBPDL Blog
FBI's 2018 Hate Crime Data Shows Blacks 2.6 Times More Likely Than Whites to Commit Hate Crimes
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Let’s paraphrase an article from American Thinker back in 2017. It’s an important one, helping us understand the truly malevolent forces of the corporate media.

Here we go.

Data contradicting the approved narrative of the anti-white left rarely garner headlines. Non-whites must always be victims of the heartless white majority, correct? So our helpful government bureaucrats bury data contradicting the approved story, forcing those interested in the truth to bring out their calculators and crunch the numbers a little.

You might have heard or read a story regarding the FBI’s release of 2018 Hate Crime Statistics.

Buried below the headlines in the report was this nugget of racial pertinent information

In 2018, race was reported for 6,266 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:

  • 53.6 percent were White.
  • 24.0 percent were Black or African American.
  • 6.9 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (group of multiple races).
  • 1.3 percent were Asian.
  • 1.0 percent were American Indian or Alaska Native.
  • 0.3 percent (19 offenders) were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.
  • 12.9 percent were unknown.

Odd the FBI doesn’t break out Hispanic offenders, right? Are they lumped in with whites?

According to US Census data for 2018, blacks made up 13.3 percent and whites made up 76.9 percent of the population, respectively. If blacks and whites committed hate crimes at the same rate, you would have expected Whites to commit five times as many hate crimes as African-Americans, and three quarters of all hate crimes would be attributed to white offenders. In reality, when you adjust for population, you find that blacks are about 2.6 times more likely to commit a hate crime than a white person.

What percent of those 12.9 percent of individuals whose race was “unknown” who were reported to have committed a hate crime were probably black? Does the corporate media even acknowledge a news story where a black person is accused of committing a hate crime?

In a country where Jussie Smollett was capable of motivating every major corporate media institution into publishing stories attacking white people wearing MAGA hats as the ultimate embodiment of hate, it’s worth noting blacks in 2018 were 2.6 times more likely to commit hate crimes than whites.

If democracy dies in darkness, why isn’t this fact universally known?


Hide 35 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Ha! No Hispanics. That’s hilarious.

    How obviously deliberate can you get? Deliberately skewing the data by lumping browns in with whites to falsely alter the percentages should be a prosecutable offense.

    Basically, it renders their numbers unusable – deliberately. I don’t know who gets to make those sorts of rulings but you can’t convince me that it can’t be tracked back one person.

    Either someone given a position of power at the FBI or someone outside the agency having ‘placed’ a minion in position to be of service.

    • Agree: Mr. Rational
  2. The FBI as a matter of course counts Hispanics as “White” when they perpetrate but as separate victim category (the same goes for Jews, Arabs, …), part methodology and part “cooking the books”.

    What´s more important is that blacks cannot commit hate crimes against Whites – i.e. the thousands of rapes and mob assaults do not count no matter what is uttered – , only against groups protecteder than theysselves.
    This more or less leaves Jews and homos – and the statistic a wee bit crass 😀

  3. eah says:

    Again: there should not be ‘hate crimes’ — they will be used against/to further punish Whites 99% of the time; they are another tool the Establishment uses to oppress and intimidate Whites — whether ‘hate’ was a factor or not in a crime should just be investigated as part of the motive — don’t do anything to legitimize ‘hate crime’ laws.

    OT (‘teens’)

    Teens killed woman for $100, grabbed fast food after dumping body, police say

    • Replies: @eah
  4. blacks are about 2.6 times more likely to commit a hate crime than a white person.

    Sorry, but this isn’t remotely accurate. Given identical circumstances, whites are charged with so-called “hate crimes” if they’re merely accused of looking sideways at minorities, while those same minorities get off scot-free from crimes of actual violence perpetrated upon white people.

    Look at the FBI crime stats by race and you’ll see that blacks are responsible for 26 times as many crimes of violence upon whites as the reverse, adjusted for population. That’s an astronomical difference, and an appropriate starting point for judging the relative incidences of “hate crimes”.

    the FBI doesn’t break out Hispanic offenders, right? Are they lumped in with whites?

    Experience in virtually every jurisdiction has shown that latino offenders are indeed lumped together with whites. It’s latino victims who are separated out, in order to support the Narrative.

  5. Check your math.
    I get 2.6X as likely, not more likely.
    There is a difference
    I suspect you are right, Hispanics are included with whites.

  6. and always remember, even these statistics under represent black hate crimes because a black would have to be screaming racial slurs, carrying very explicit signs and all of this on camera in front of hundreds of witnesses for it to be called a hate crime.

    • Agree: Charon
  7. And you know the data collection methodologies and institutional bias of the deep staters in the DOJ is tweaked to Nth degree to minimize at all costs “noticing”.

  8. unit472 says:

    Given that the threshold for what constitutes a ‘hate crime’ for whites is lower( it can be as low as leaving a loop on a rope that a negro sees on your desk) whereas a negro can escape being charged, like Jussie Smollet, when his actions were INTENDED to be interpreted as a hate crime the data itself is likely fraudulently compiles. Toss in the fact that is was the Comey, McCabe, Strzok FBI doing the counting and its really Garbage In, Garbage Out compiled to minimize the reality that hate crimes against whites are a dime a dozen and one committed against a negro a rarity.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @Charon
  9. eah says:


    Toronto is now a post-Canadian city — reminder: there is no endpoint for ‘diversity’ — for all white countries, there will never come a time when it’s decided OK, that’s enough ‘diversity’.

    • Replies: @Flubber
  10. loren says:

    any crime with a victim is a hate crime.
    the term hate crime is them controlling the dialog.

    • Agree: Gunga Din, Charon
  11. @HammerJack

    Per capita blacks are about 20x more wont to murder Whites than vice versa,
    mob assault (what may pass for “lynching”) 300x,
    rape >1000x.

    But these are not “hate” crimes, see 😛

    • Agree: HammerJack
  12. KenH says:

    If we make the logical and fair assumption that hispanics commit hate crimes in proportion to their percentage in the general population than you’d have to subtract 18% from the white offense rate which knocks it down to 35.6% which means whites are underrepresented by a factor of 1.7.

    The other thing that keeps the black offense rate artificially lower IMO is the seeming reluctance to charge blacks with hate crimes. I’ve lost count of the stories I’ve read where blacks are clearly profiling and targeting whites but the cops play dumb as to the facts and/or the corrupt prosecutor refuses to charge the blacks with hate crimes.

    A circumstantial case can be made that hate crime laws are being selectively enforced against whites.

    The concept of hate crimes are antithetical to the Constitution and should be repealed immediately. Even a former SCOTUS justice (can’t remember his name) said as much because they punish the thoughts and speech of the offender.

    It was Jewish pressure groups like the ADL and SPLC who lobbied tirelessly for hate crime laws. Draw your own conclusions.

  13. Eric “My People” Holder told us to our faces on National Tv that Hate Crime Legislation was not for his people: It was for Whites and Whites alone.

    He was telling the truth

  14. All “hate crime” laws must be abolished. Even were they applied fairly (instead of targeting Whites) they give governments way too much power.

  15. Swamp Fox says: • Website

    Perhaps what blacks are committing are “love crimes,” as in they would love to have your possessions, your woman, your life.
    The real hate crimes are the endless hoaxes that
    these menthol lovers try to perpetrate.
    They’ll spray paint their house or business to get out from a mortgage or to manipulate a landlord.
    These are the people who need to be tried under the ridiculous hate crime statutes.

  16. I’ve pointed it out before but in my town’s 24 hour arrest list (with photos) I’ve sometimes seen multiple Hispanics on the list with some being listed as white and some listed as Hispanic. In every case, they look like Juan Valdez just rode his donkey down off the coffee plantation in Cental America and there’s no mistaking they aren’t white by any stretch of the imagination. Might as well post a picture of a donkey and call it an Arabian stallion, a picture of a parakeet and label it as a red tailed hawk or a picture of a goldfish and call it a great white shark. Makes just as much sense.

    Oh wait! Maybe I’m just not “woke” and PC enough! Maybe the Hispanics identify as white just like Lizzie Warren identifies as Native American and Rachel Dolezal identifies as a Negro! That must be it! And the donkey, parakeet and goldfish all identify respectively as an Arabian Stallion, a red tailed hawk and a great white shark! Gaaah! I’m committing micro-aggressions by refusing to acknowledge their inner reality! Someone please check my cis-gendered white patriarchal privilege and boomer bigotry by verbally flogging me to death! I deserve it! Give me that tongue lashing now! Maybe a man who’s having his period can school me on how evil I am?

    All mockery aside, there’s no doubt when the arrest stats are reported to the state that the Hispanics listed as white remain listed as such in order to skew the stats. The funny thing though is that I’ve never seen an Asian, Arab or Indian listed as white. I guess they aren’t committing enough crime as a demographic yet to get that special treatment.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
  17. Anonymous[355] • Disclaimer says:

    The fact that the data that gets recorded indicates blacks commit a relatively high rate of hate crimes is damning.

    The fact that blacks even supposedly commit them 2.6 times more often than whites is due to major data manipulation and gross non-reporting.

    The fact that Hispanics supposedly committed no hate crimes at all means all of theirs are lumped in with whites to inflate their baseline number.

    Meanwhile, the only hate crimes blacks are reported to commit are against people as high as them or higher on the Victim Pyramid. Blacks will only get reported as committing hate crimes if the victims are homo/transsexuals, Muslims, and possibly Jews and East Asians. Any crime they commit against white people, no matter how many slurs and racial taunts they are recorded yelling while standing over their incapacitated victims, is not considered a hate crime. Add these in, and they would probably be committing well over half of all hate crimes.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  18. HT says:

    It would not matter if blacks were a million times more likely to commit hate crimes than whites, the media and the government would never let on. We joke about the Orwellian aspects of life today, but it’s really no joke as it manifests itself in issues like this. Whites must be demonized and destroyed and blacks protected no matter the reality.

  19. If democracy dies in darkness, why isn’t this fact universally known?

    Because it’s already dead, killed by the keepers of The Narrative.  Seriously.  If we had democracy, Proposition 187 WOULD have come into force, and WOULD have cut off public benefits to illegal aliens in California.  If we had democracy, Arizona SB 1070 would have gone into force and Arizona would have started cleaning up its illegal alien problem.

    How many people “know” that anal sodomy is no more likely to spread HIV than vaginal intercourse?  That’s BS, of course, and it is OBVIOUS that it’s BS because PrEP is ONLY given to sodomites and other “high-risk” groups, but you have people who lose their minds if you say that such acts are literally dangerous to public health and should be punished to keep people from doing them.  How can people properly vote on an issue if all the authorities they trust for information are lying to them?  How can you have democracy when people vote based on lies… and when they vote based on truth, their votes are cancelled by unelected judges?

    Democracy is dead in the USA.

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @KenH
    , @anon
  20. KenH says:
    @Mr. Rational

    Kritarchy > Democracy

    For proposition 187 the Jewish judge essentially ruled that illegal aliens have a constitutional right to the tax dollars of U.S. citizens via various welfare programs. Rights and privileges are constantly being read into and out of the Constitution every year by the corrupt judiciary.

    • Replies: @HammerJack
    , @Charon
  21. @Non PC Infidel

    Lots of MENA type Arabs and Persians are identified as white when they are apprehended for crime.

  22. @KenH

    One ruling among many. It’s quite telling that TPTB rolled out the big guns when a few people dared to use the word Kritarchy recently.

    They don’t want the noticing to spread. Though you’d have to be living under a rock not to notice the federal judges making law lately. That or watching t.v.

    Because in the media they’re not activist judges but freedom fighters protecting us from the great big bad orange man.

  23. @HammerJack

    HammerJack———No,you can’t be serious.How dare you imply that our beloved Uncle Sam can’t be trusted.

  24. @Anonymous

    More than 80% if they use a colorblind definition that doesn´t violate the equal protection clause and the Fourteenth.

    Like the fabled Nuremberg standard, “hate crimes” cannot be codified in a form that doesn´t hit THEM in the clit first 😀

  25. lgarou says:

    Translation: FBI’s 2018 Hate Crime Data Shows Blacks 10 Times More Likely Than Whites to Commit Hate Crimes.

  26. anon[384] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Rational

    The latest election outdid the props mentioned. The gas tax; even the libtards believed that was a fix, and the landlord rights proposition. In a state with out of control rents, REITs and Airbnb investors, it’s pretty amazing that all the wage coolies and welfare types agreed with the slumlords that 3000% rental increases per annum are a good thing. That the gas tax was even on the ballot was a concession to Nor Cal commuters, but to think that every Hispanic (51% of the pop..legally anyway), along with the long distance commuting rural and So Cal drivers would stab themselves in the pocketbook? These issues pretty much cemented the feeling that California government is anything but voter driven.

    For the fags and their AIDS drugs? Simple really. Big Pharma has a taxpayer subsidized cash cow for every Positive fruit. 20 years of 20000/year meds (they croak by 20 years on average). That’s just the retrovirals. And since the drugs don’t prevent the spread in the gay lifestyle, it’s just like a vampire scourge with exponential reproduction of the various STDs that become chronic. Which makes for many more health issues before they finally expire in a noxious puddle of their own stench and filth, all of which are covered by Obamacare. Bend over taxpayers, we’re all on the receiving end here. Without Vaseline either

  27. Odd the FBI doesn’t break out Hispanic offenders, right? Are they lumped in with whites?

    Is the Pope Argentine?

  28. anon[155] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Black savages attack female employee at Philadelphia McDonald’s

    Interesting stat:
    Chicago police respond to more than 20 911 calls to McDonald’s restaurants daily.

  29. Flubber says:

    There is an endpoint – zero white people.

    • Replies: @Charon
  30. These figures are misleading because isn’t doesn’t adjust for income, IQ, or testosterone levels.

  31. @anon

    It’s a pity that such McDonalds outlets are not shut down as public nuisances.

    Of course, the same would have to be done for every bit of Section 8 housing.

  32. @anon

    They’ll be crying racisim, discrimination, and job loss when McDonalds replaces all of their workers in the hood with robots behind 6 inches of plexiglass, and touch kiosks where you order & pay for your food first, then they make it. Once it gets to that point, I might feel safe enough to eat & order fast food again.

  33. Charon says:

    The bar is much lower than that for whites. And by the way, I’ve never heard of anyone casually leaving a noose on anyone’s desktop. Except for hate-crime hoaxes, that is, of which there have been quite a number.

    • Troll: AR in Illinois
  34. Charon says:

    It’s possible that the endpoint will be when electricity and water stop flowing. Before that final day there will be lurching stops and starts, but at some point it will be too late.

  35. Charon says:

    illegal aliens have a constitutional right to the tax dollars of U.S. citizens

    That’s the crux of the matter right there.

    Just as with free medical care, non-citizens have more rights than citizens. Does it then follow that if we renounce our citizenship we can get in on the gravy train? Somehow I doubt it.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Kersey Comments via RSS