The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersSBPDL Blog
Because 98% of Those Arrested for Violating Shreveport, Louisiana's "Saggy Pants" Law Were Black, City Abolishes the Law
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Not much needed to add to this one…[City to end ‘Saggy pants’ law that mostly affects black men, EastTexasMatters.com, June 12, 2019]

The city of Shreveport, Louisiana, has moved to abolish a 2007 ordinance banning people from wearing pants below their waistline.

The Shreveport Times reports the City Council voted 6-1 Tuesday to abolish the law. Police data show it resulted in the arrests of a total of 699 black men and 12 white men.

The law has been questioned since 31-year-old Anthony Childs died in February after an officer tried to stop him for sagging pants. Police say Officer Traveion Brooks chased and shot Childs three times. A coroner’s report says Childs was ultimately killed by a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

The ordinance said arrests and searches couldn’t solely be based on violating the ordinance. Police Chief Ben Raymond says it’s unclear if anybody was arrested for the violation alone.

For those wondering, Shreveport has been awarded a crime index of 2 from the website NeighborhoodScout.com, meaning the city is safer than exactly two percent of American cities…

 
Hide 62 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Heck, if I lived a crappy place like that I’d just not bother wearing pants at all. Who would really give a damn?

    • Replies: @Boy the way Glenn Miller played

    Heck, if I lived a crappy place like that I’d just not bother wearing pants at all. Who would really give a damn?
     
    As I understand things, in africa, wearing a loin cloth is all the rage.
  2. Not to mention the fact that for young black males, that billboard is both redundant and contradictory – which must have created a lot of confusion. ツ

  3. He punched a guy and it made his eye pop out. Then he punched the popped out eye, causing it to “explode”.

    https://foxbaltimore.com/news/nation-world/man-arrested-after-punching-another-mans-eyeball-that-already-popped-out-of-its-socket

  4. • Replies: @Loren
    reminds me of the 2 male brits raped and killed by a black youth in a black area of florida...Uk daily mail reported on what happened. the guys were drunk and wandered too far into a bad area.
  5. One young Black man interpreted my glance as unwanted commentary on his sagging.Opened my vest to show him the “no assatall “suspenders. Nuff said. Don’t need those “sagging” laws.Just feed the old guys a biscuit,and have them hang out beltless in the mall food court..2 weeks of that,and you couldn’t pay Jarrifus to flash his panties.

  6. Of course the ordinance is idiotic on its face – to us; a glaring example of the less the Law is respected the more laws are needed.

    But to Them …
    running around threatening people is to assert themselves, their dominance and muh dik.
    (much the same goes for bling, grills, rims an sheet)
    It is, quite literally, Life Itself; take it away, and what are they still living for?

    – That some White women fall for this shit is direct incontrovertible proof of the caveperson brain.
    (reminds me of those German RomComs from the 1950s – the daughter comes of age and has to have an Italian before she settles down – back when that was cute 😉 )

    – I trust the 12 wiggers are not traumatized for life by learning some rules 😛

    They are not like us.

    • Replies: @Nina
    I am white and I WOULD NOT BE interested in anybody who wore their pants down around their knees. I would be too embarrassed to be seen with them.
    , @TimothySZ
    I have been told that the saggy pants trend originated to show solidarity with those who had been arrested. The belt is one of the first things taken from prisoners. I would fully support an ordinance which required you be arrested if you were wearing saggy pants AND a belt.

    A friendly PSA to young black men.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlKL_EpnSp8

    "a glaring example of the less the Law is respected the more laws are needed."
    Why are we always just one more law away from utopia?

    In prison, there is a tendency for law to resolve the circuitous forms of legislation into a more primitive, logical form. Cops, corrections officers and prosecutors charged with upholding the law each make their own "little" compromises.
    The habit of coverups, abuse of process and sadism have been accepted for generations. The incompetence and divided loyalties of legislators is perennial. This will take countless acts of personal moral courage. "More laws" are neither useful nor welcome.

  7. “Officer Traveion Brooks”?

    OK, let’s have a look at Officer Traveon, shall we?

    Sorry, I can’t get an image anywhere. Lots of reports that Officer Traveon Brooks fired 8 or 9 shots into Anthony Child’s carcass, but no picture at all of Traveon.

    Hmmm. What can we surmise from this incident?

    • Replies: @Truth-hammer
    Odd name for a white guy.
  8. “Saggin” spelled backwards is…

    😃

    • Agree: CENTURION
    • LOL: Anonymoose
    • Replies: @Truth-hammer
    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
  9. You have to wonder why politicians try. In the history of humankind has there ever been any legislation that actually cured the black dysfunction it sought to remedy?

    • Agree: CENTURION
    • Replies: @Anon
    I believe many people refer to this as "segregation" or "Jim Crow".

    ; )
  10. White teen shot dead by saggy pants in Gary;
    • in front of the victim’s father
    • while attempting to sell Xbox (online robbery set up)

    https://dailykenn.blogspot.com/2019/06/white-teen-shot-dead-in-front-of-his.html

    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    For $50?

    Throw the piece of shit out and buy your next one. Or trade it in at the store you’re buying the new one from.

    Meeting two nogs on the street -unarmed - is a recipe for disaster.

    Here’s an idea, give your kid the $50 and throw it out yourself. Tell him you sold it for him.

    I couldn’t imagine a scenario as described here. I don’t want to.

    Cities would burn.
  11. I have always observed that wherever you find the negro, his pants are falling down around him. –Robert E. Levi

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    That was a stroke of genius!
  12. Post white America deserves to fall.

  13. It’s almost funny but here you have an ordinance designed for the betterment of the community and focused directly on the black men who’s behavior you are trying to correct. The numbers show the desired outcome – young black males who drop their pants in public have been issued summonses at a rate of almost 60-1, putting a price tag on one of their vulgar habits.

    Roll forward to current BRA, where the negro is becoming the new ‘untouchable’ and now we’re toldnthat we’re all racist for not accepting the vulgar behavior as ‘cultural expression’ and the law is reversed.

    I’d say ‘how stupid are we?’, but it’s not ‘we’ at all. This is the work of the communist influence that invaded our government and is allowed to remain. Until we remedy that by one means or another, we will continue losing OUR culture, OUR history and OUR country as statuary, artwork and our past is erased.

    It’s tantamount to making home invasion legal after finding that most of the aggressors are black. You’re not fighting crime, you’re restricting trade. How else is Jedbxishifnfjiam supposed to support a

    To call this a slippery slope would be an understatement. If we allow this to continue unchallenged we may as well hand over the keys to this once great land to the handlers of the black hordes.

    • Agree: 95Theses
    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
    AGREE on all points.


    ((( communist influence )))

    ((( handlers of the orcs )))
    , @Justvisiting

    It’s tantamount to making home invasion legal after finding that most of the aggressors are black.
     
    White people are going to have to learn how the average Nigerian citizen deals with this challenge.
    Make sure your house looks like it is going to fall apart (peeling paint a necessary accessory). Keep useless garbage on the front lawn.

    It is called camouflage--works reasonably well in the animal kingdom.
    , @nokangaroos
    (never you fret - all that is already in the pipeline; shoplifting: check; rape and mob assault are already de facto sibbyl rites, and so on ... :( )

    You cannot "correct" their biology by a few simple rules - even if you took away their pants or
    tackered them onto their sorry posteriors, they´d find some other way of looking
    ("baaad" is the preferred term; "pathetic" be WAYCISS :P ).

    The sensible thing (meaning it won´t happen) would be to shoot on sight everything that struts, shucks, jives, dresses and makes noises like a thug; colorblind, cheap, quick and natural cure for
    well north of 80% of all social pathologies including gun bilence and racism.

    (Disclaimer: The humble one explicitely rejects and perempts whatever liability or responsibility for LaTrina´s and D´Gonorrhea´s sex lives :D )

  14. @Kenn Daily
    White teen shot dead by saggy pants in Gary;
    • in front of the victim's father
    • while attempting to sell Xbox (online robbery set up)

    https://dailykenn.blogspot.com/2019/06/white-teen-shot-dead-in-front-of-his.html

    For $50?

    Throw the piece of shit out and buy your next one. Or trade it in at the store you’re buying the new one from.

    Meeting two nogs on the street -unarmed – is a recipe for disaster.

    Here’s an idea, give your kid the $50 and throw it out yourself. Tell him you sold it for him.

    I couldn’t imagine a scenario as described here. I don’t want to.

    Cities would burn.

    • Replies: @The Captain
    When I used to sell items on Craig’s List, I always kept a gun in my pocket. Nowadays, I don’t want anybody visiting my house from online sales sites.
  15. @nokangaroos
    Of course the ordinance is idiotic on its face - to us; a glaring example of the less the Law is respected the more laws are needed.

    But to Them ...
    running around threatening people is to assert themselves, their dominance and muh dik.
    (much the same goes for bling, grills, rims an sheet)
    It is, quite literally, Life Itself; take it away, and what are they still living for?

    - That some White women fall for this shit is direct incontrovertible proof of the caveperson brain.
    (reminds me of those German RomComs from the 1950s - the daughter comes of age and has to have an Italian before she settles down - back when that was cute ;) )

    - I trust the 12 wiggers are not traumatized for life by learning some rules :P

    They are not like us.

    I am white and I WOULD NOT BE interested in anybody who wore their pants down around their knees. I would be too embarrassed to be seen with them.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    I didn´t mean our women are debased, only wont to fall for dominance ;)
    Sorry if my biologistic terms came over wrong.
    , @Boy the way Glenn Miller played
    I

    am white and I WOULD NOT BE interested in anybody who wore their pants down around their knees. I would be too embarrassed to be seen with them.
     
    I'm so old that I can remember when ladies and men tried to dress as other than whores and prisoners before they went out in public.
  16. @Jim in Jersey
    It’s almost funny but here you have an ordinance designed for the betterment of the community and focused directly on the black men who’s behavior you are trying to correct. The numbers show the desired outcome - young black males who drop their pants in public have been issued summonses at a rate of almost 60-1, putting a price tag on one of their vulgar habits.

    Roll forward to current BRA, where the negro is becoming the new ‘untouchable’ and now we’re toldnthat we’re all racist for not accepting the vulgar behavior as ‘cultural expression’ and the law is reversed.

    I’d say ‘how stupid are we?’, but it’s not ‘we’ at all. This is the work of the communist influence that invaded our government and is allowed to remain. Until we remedy that by one means or another, we will continue losing OUR culture, OUR history and OUR country as statuary, artwork and our past is erased.

    It’s tantamount to making home invasion legal after finding that most of the aggressors are black. You’re not fighting crime, you’re restricting trade. How else is Jedbxishifnfjiam supposed to support a

    To call this a slippery slope would be an understatement. If we allow this to continue unchallenged we may as well hand over the keys to this once great land to the handlers of the black hordes.

    AGREE on all points.

    ((( communist influence )))

    ((( handlers of the orcs )))

  17. I’m sure that after all of the white-history statues have been removed from Shreveport and other southern urban areas, someone will want to erect a statue to the memory of the saggy-pants heros of the early 21st century. Goes along with the communist-inspired dismantling of the white influence in American society. Next, if not already, prosecutions of blacks for killing whites will become accepted cultural practice just as the fanatical social-justice left advocates killing babies up to and including the time they are born. In truth, life means nothing to the sjw leftists and they will do anything and everything to solidify their power. Giving the African knee-grow freedom to act and do as he likes is part of sowing the seeds of chaos required for a communist take-over of Amerika. Me thinks its going to get very ugly.

  18. @Anon
    Average age of his most current three vicrims...

    75!

    https://amp.local10.com/news/florida/broward/man-28-pleads-not-guilty-in-canadian-couples-killings-in-pompano-beach

    reminds me of the 2 male brits raped and killed by a black youth in a black area of florida…Uk daily mail reported on what happened. the guys were drunk and wandered too far into a bad area.

  19. @Anonymous0619
    “Saggin” spelled backwards is...

    😃

    Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

  20. @Raccoon
    "Officer Traveion Brooks"?

    OK, let's have a look at Officer Traveon, shall we?


    Sorry, I can't get an image anywhere. Lots of reports that Officer Traveon Brooks fired 8 or 9 shots into Anthony Child's carcass, but no picture at all of Traveon.

    Hmmm. What can we surmise from this incident?

    Odd name for a white guy.

  21. @Jim in Jersey
    It’s almost funny but here you have an ordinance designed for the betterment of the community and focused directly on the black men who’s behavior you are trying to correct. The numbers show the desired outcome - young black males who drop their pants in public have been issued summonses at a rate of almost 60-1, putting a price tag on one of their vulgar habits.

    Roll forward to current BRA, where the negro is becoming the new ‘untouchable’ and now we’re toldnthat we’re all racist for not accepting the vulgar behavior as ‘cultural expression’ and the law is reversed.

    I’d say ‘how stupid are we?’, but it’s not ‘we’ at all. This is the work of the communist influence that invaded our government and is allowed to remain. Until we remedy that by one means or another, we will continue losing OUR culture, OUR history and OUR country as statuary, artwork and our past is erased.

    It’s tantamount to making home invasion legal after finding that most of the aggressors are black. You’re not fighting crime, you’re restricting trade. How else is Jedbxishifnfjiam supposed to support a

    To call this a slippery slope would be an understatement. If we allow this to continue unchallenged we may as well hand over the keys to this once great land to the handlers of the black hordes.

    It’s tantamount to making home invasion legal after finding that most of the aggressors are black.

    White people are going to have to learn how the average Nigerian citizen deals with this challenge.
    Make sure your house looks like it is going to fall apart (peeling paint a necessary accessory). Keep useless garbage on the front lawn.

    It is called camouflage–works reasonably well in the animal kingdom.

  22. as anti-gay as most are.. never understood their attraction to it..
    my understanding.. it began as a prison thing.. signifying you’re a bitch.. you’re up for it, cuz ya pants are down for it……………… *shrugz*

    cops love it, makes ’em easier to catch on the run.

    • Replies: @Sick 'n Tired
    I heard a good correlation about police shootings and sagging pants.

    When these future pillars of society are running from the cops, their sagging pants start falling down, so they have to use one hand to hold them up. To the officer chasing them, it looks like they are reaching into their waistband to grab a gun, so the officer shoots them, only to find out it's just another "unarmed teen" that was trying to keep his pants from falling down.
    , @Boy the way Glenn Miller played

    as anti-gay as most are.. never understood their attraction to it..
    my understanding.. it began as a prison thing.. signifying you’re a bitch.. you’re up for it, cuz ya pants are down for it……………… *shrugz*
     
    It may be an "urban legend" (?) but as I understand it, the idea of wearing ones pants that way in prison was a walking billboard that you were a sissy. You were advertising what you were willing to do for a few cigarettes, a candy bar, or for any bigger guy to stop the other men from beating you up.
    , @Achmed E. Newman

    cops love it, makes ’em easier to catch on the run.
     
    AGREED, Kikz. I remember thinking this when I first saw this sort of thing (how many years ago, 25?)
  23. @Feedsackroad
    You have to wonder why politicians try. In the history of humankind has there ever been any legislation that actually cured the black dysfunction it sought to remedy?

    I believe many people refer to this as “segregation” or “Jim Crow”.

    ; )

  24. Looks like I have to be the lefty contrarian this time.

    Not simply a case of blacks breaking the law more that White Folks, though they certainly do.

    It was known ahead of time this is something done by the lowest sort of blacks and a few extreme wiggers only. Therefore a discriminatory law from the start.

    On a personal note, I do not mind such people making themselves even more visible.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @MarkU
    Here in the UK we have a slightly different version of the same problem, the police numbers have been cut to save money so we can't enforce the laws we do have, but that stop them passing newer and even less enforceable laws. Its a bit like the law is just a catch all these days, only to be enforced if you are a dissident.
  25. @Jim in Jersey
    It’s almost funny but here you have an ordinance designed for the betterment of the community and focused directly on the black men who’s behavior you are trying to correct. The numbers show the desired outcome - young black males who drop their pants in public have been issued summonses at a rate of almost 60-1, putting a price tag on one of their vulgar habits.

    Roll forward to current BRA, where the negro is becoming the new ‘untouchable’ and now we’re toldnthat we’re all racist for not accepting the vulgar behavior as ‘cultural expression’ and the law is reversed.

    I’d say ‘how stupid are we?’, but it’s not ‘we’ at all. This is the work of the communist influence that invaded our government and is allowed to remain. Until we remedy that by one means or another, we will continue losing OUR culture, OUR history and OUR country as statuary, artwork and our past is erased.

    It’s tantamount to making home invasion legal after finding that most of the aggressors are black. You’re not fighting crime, you’re restricting trade. How else is Jedbxishifnfjiam supposed to support a

    To call this a slippery slope would be an understatement. If we allow this to continue unchallenged we may as well hand over the keys to this once great land to the handlers of the black hordes.

    (never you fret – all that is already in the pipeline; shoplifting: check; rape and mob assault are already de facto sibbyl rites, and so on … 🙁 )

    You cannot “correct” their biology by a few simple rules – even if you took away their pants or
    tackered them onto their sorry posteriors, they´d find some other way of looking
    (“baaad” is the preferred term; “pathetic” be WAYCISS 😛 ).

    The sensible thing (meaning it won´t happen) would be to shoot on sight everything that struts, shucks, jives, dresses and makes noises like a thug; colorblind, cheap, quick and natural cure for
    well north of 80% of all social pathologies including gun bilence and racism.

    (Disclaimer: The humble one explicitely rejects and perempts whatever liability or responsibility for LaTrina´s and D´Gonorrhea´s sex lives 😀 )

  26. “Louisiana’s “Saggy Pants” Law ”

    Itz a genetic/cultural (nature/nurture) thing. Back in Africa because of their inherent low IQ they never invented belts and consequently it became a cultural thing. Most of their African DNA is still intact from when they roamed the jungles. Itz going to take a few thousand years for them to catch up but of course that’s not going to happen because stupid White people give them food and money to breed. Itz going to get a lot worse in the future.

    I see a dark age coming upon the world where Mother Nature will cleanse the world of man’s meddling in upsetting her Laws of Nature.

  27. @Nina
    I am white and I WOULD NOT BE interested in anybody who wore their pants down around their knees. I would be too embarrassed to be seen with them.

    I didn´t mean our women are debased, only wont to fall for dominance 😉
    Sorry if my biologistic terms came over wrong.

  28. Anonymous[651] • Disclaimer says:

    Many point out how inverted reality is depicted on television. Virtually every commercial on TV features either blacks lecturing white people, black doctors/scientists/millionaires, and/or interracial couples. Criminals and the butt of jokes are always portrayed by white men. These propagated themes are now all painfully obvious to all of us who notice.

    But there are even more subtle layers of engineering going on in the most sterile of commercials. I just saw a commercial for a anti-diabetes drug where a doctor was talking with a group of patients. What was odd was that, save for one black man, every single one of the twenty or so patients was an old white person. Even though blacks are known to be two to three times more likely to develop diabetes than whites, the commercial intentionally skews the demographic reality of what a group of older diabetics would look like, I guess since that could potentially be seen as portraying blacks in a negative light. If the commercial tried to accurately portray an accurate demographic distribution of diabetes in the older population, a quarter or a third of the patients in the commercial should have been black. Meanwhile, in commercials for the national forests, half of the families depicted camping together are black.

  29. This Sunday is Baby Daddy Day aka Bastard’s Day in da hood as most blacks are born as bastards and bastettes. Be careful as you take Dad out to dinner for Father’s Day as the sight of an intact, healthy, functional white family will be an expression of white privilege and might enrage a sow with six fatherless chilluns. Even more offensive is the white name of the holiday which is culturally insensitive and dismissive of black brood sows and their penchant for having lots of bastard chilluns all with different last names. It’s a very stressful time for Sharonika as she has a hard time rounding up her six kids and six suspected baby daddies and getting them all to a restaurant as she doesn’t have da money to rent a mini-bus. Besides, other sows are after those same baby daddies too and that creates a conflict. Even if they all do get to a restaurant somehow, there’s going to be a brawl that breaks out with weaves being ripped out everywhere, chairs being thrown and lots of loud cursing and screaming. It’s traditional!

    Unless Dad wants a floor show with his meal, avoid cheap buffets and go to an expensive restaurant.

  30. This just goes to show that belts are not available to the “community” in the same numbers as white, former slaveholding, rayciss Americans. Until we solve this problem, dare l say no justice, no peace!

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    It's a big problem here. Most of Shreveport is a belt desert.

    (just piling on your quip.)
  31. @nokangaroos
    Of course the ordinance is idiotic on its face - to us; a glaring example of the less the Law is respected the more laws are needed.

    But to Them ...
    running around threatening people is to assert themselves, their dominance and muh dik.
    (much the same goes for bling, grills, rims an sheet)
    It is, quite literally, Life Itself; take it away, and what are they still living for?

    - That some White women fall for this shit is direct incontrovertible proof of the caveperson brain.
    (reminds me of those German RomComs from the 1950s - the daughter comes of age and has to have an Italian before she settles down - back when that was cute ;) )

    - I trust the 12 wiggers are not traumatized for life by learning some rules :P

    They are not like us.

    I have been told that the saggy pants trend originated to show solidarity with those who had been arrested. The belt is one of the first things taken from prisoners. I would fully support an ordinance which required you be arrested if you were wearing saggy pants AND a belt.

    A friendly PSA to young black men.

    “a glaring example of the less the Law is respected the more laws are needed.”
    Why are we always just one more law away from utopia?

    In prison, there is a tendency for law to resolve the circuitous forms of legislation into a more primitive, logical form. Cops, corrections officers and prosecutors charged with upholding the law each make their own “little” compromises.
    The habit of coverups, abuse of process and sadism have been accepted for generations. The incompetence and divided loyalties of legislators is perennial. This will take countless acts of personal moral courage. “More laws” are neither useful nor welcome.

  32. @kikz
    as anti-gay as most are.. never understood their attraction to it..
    my understanding.. it began as a prison thing.. signifying you're a bitch.. you're up for it, cuz ya pants are down for it.................. *shrugz*

    cops love it, makes 'em easier to catch on the run.

    I heard a good correlation about police shootings and sagging pants.

    When these future pillars of society are running from the cops, their sagging pants start falling down, so they have to use one hand to hold them up. To the officer chasing them, it looks like they are reaching into their waistband to grab a gun, so the officer shoots them, only to find out it’s just another “unarmed teen” that was trying to keep his pants from falling down.

  33. Bill Cosby spoke out against faggy, I mean saggy pants. Now he’s in prison.

  34. Marine Veteran accidentally cuts off another driver. Attempted to apologize at the next light, and is then gunned down in front of one of his daughters. At least he returned fire and killed the perp. Small comfort to his girls, who won’t have a dad around.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7141581/Marine-veteran-41-shot-killed-road-rage-outburst.html

  35. Far be from me to criticize the cops for being too tough on black men. But I think the NYPD went a little overboard in parading around Cuba Gooding Jr. in handcuffs. A couple nights ago a woman accused him of groping her at a nightclub. It looks like very possibly a set-up.

    He turned himself in and appeared composed but there they are frog marching him around to his hearing. As if he was going to make a run for it.

    • Agree: Cortes
  36. @Sick of Orcs
    I have always observed that wherever you find the negro, his pants are falling down around him. --Robert E. Levi

    That was a stroke of genius!

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
    Thank you. We can all use a laff in these dark times.
  37. @Joe Magarac
    Looks like I have to be the lefty contrarian this time.

    Not simply a case of blacks breaking the law more that White Folks, though they certainly do.

    It was known ahead of time this is something done by the lowest sort of blacks and a few extreme wiggers only. Therefore a discriminatory law from the start.

    On a personal note, I do not mind such people making themselves even more visible.

    Here in the UK we have a slightly different version of the same problem, the police numbers have been cut to save money so we can’t enforce the laws we do have, but that stop them passing newer and even less enforceable laws. Its a bit like the law is just a catch all these days, only to be enforced if you are a dissident.

  38. @kikz
    as anti-gay as most are.. never understood their attraction to it..
    my understanding.. it began as a prison thing.. signifying you're a bitch.. you're up for it, cuz ya pants are down for it.................. *shrugz*

    cops love it, makes 'em easier to catch on the run.

    as anti-gay as most are.. never understood their attraction to it..
    my understanding.. it began as a prison thing.. signifying you’re a bitch.. you’re up for it, cuz ya pants are down for it……………… *shrugz*

    It may be an “urban legend” (?) but as I understand it, the idea of wearing ones pants that way in prison was a walking billboard that you were a sissy. You were advertising what you were willing to do for a few cigarettes, a candy bar, or for any bigger guy to stop the other men from beating you up.

  39. @Say what
    This just goes to show that belts are not available to the “community” in the same numbers as white, former slaveholding, rayciss Americans. Until we solve this problem, dare l say no justice, no peace!

    It’s a big problem here. Most of Shreveport is a belt desert.

    (just piling on your quip.)

  40. @kikz
    as anti-gay as most are.. never understood their attraction to it..
    my understanding.. it began as a prison thing.. signifying you're a bitch.. you're up for it, cuz ya pants are down for it.................. *shrugz*

    cops love it, makes 'em easier to catch on the run.

    cops love it, makes ’em easier to catch on the run.

    AGREED, Kikz. I remember thinking this when I first saw this sort of thing (how many years ago, 25?)

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    I remember strolling along the Kings Rd in London in the late 70's?
    Seeing my first proto-punks, I couldn't believe that these morons, presenting themselves as bad-asses had a chain of safety pins linking their nostril and earlobe,
    Never had any trouble with them.
  41. @Nina
    I am white and I WOULD NOT BE interested in anybody who wore their pants down around their knees. I would be too embarrassed to be seen with them.

    I

    am white and I WOULD NOT BE interested in anybody who wore their pants down around their knees. I would be too embarrassed to be seen with them.

    I’m so old that I can remember when ladies and men tried to dress as other than whores and prisoners before they went out in public.

    • Agree: Anonymous0619
  42. @Anon
    Heck, if I lived a crappy place like that I'd just not bother wearing pants at all. Who would really give a damn?

    Heck, if I lived a crappy place like that I’d just not bother wearing pants at all. Who would really give a damn?

    As I understand things, in africa, wearing a loin cloth is all the rage.

  43. OT: A little background: The problem people accuse a local restaurant of racism. The restaurant owner, Captain Steve, responds with his version and surveillance video of the events. The entire response is too lengthy to post here but these excerpts pretty much sum it up. We’re all familiar with the tactics of the problem people.

    From there, certain members of the group, began to argue loudly and raise their voices. This is occurring in the entrance to a large dining room where many people are dining and attempting to enjoy their meal.

    One particular member of the party flew into a rage and had to be escorted out by members of her own group. She was cursing and screaming and could be heard well above the sound of an already crowded restaurant.

    ‘Restaurant Responds To Accusations Of Racism With Statement And Surveillance Video’

    June 14, 2019

    Captain Steve’s has broken its silence about an incident that occurred on June 1st at their Fort Mill location, which sparked accusations of racism against the restaurant and its employees…

    https://www.wccbcharlotte.com/2019/06/14/another-restaurant-under-fire-accused-of-racism/

    • Replies: @Anon
    “It’s about how we was treated, how we was thrown out on my husband’s birthday. We didn’t get to go have no cake and ice cream because we already go back to the house,” said Sylvia Blair.

    Poor them. The only thing worse than blacks in restaurants is large groups of blacks in restaurants. At least nobody got to be their server and lose out on tip money or even waste their time with them.
  44. The Shreveport Times reports the City Council voted 6-1 Tuesday to abolish the law. Police data show it resulted in the arrests of a total of 699 black men and 12 white men.

    What are the names of these 12 bitch boys? Back in the day, ostracism worked wonders. Failing that, there’s always the wood shampoo.

  45. THANKS UK DAILY MAIL

    Kellen Winslow Jr, 35, was convicted of raping a 58-year-old homeless woman

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7142493/Kellen-Winslow-Jr-masturbated-NFL-teammates-watched-porn.html

  46. @Achmed E. Newman

    cops love it, makes ’em easier to catch on the run.
     
    AGREED, Kikz. I remember thinking this when I first saw this sort of thing (how many years ago, 25?)

    I remember strolling along the Kings Rd in London in the late 70’s?
    Seeing my first proto-punks, I couldn’t believe that these morons, presenting themselves as bad-asses had a chain of safety pins linking their nostril and earlobe,
    Never had any trouble with them.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
    Haha! Same thoughts I had on this too, Bill. It's even worse. It's one thing to lose your pants and just keep on running, but another to catch that chain on the top of a chain link fence and rip a chunk of your nose off, or earlobe, or whatever is the weakest link in the chain (idiom intended!). You may as well just get arrested.
  47. @Achmed E. Newman
    That was a stroke of genius!

    Thank you. We can all use a laff in these dark times.

  48. Utopia awaits. San Francisco leads the way. AI to determine when criminal charges are filled.

    Let me help.

    If Race = “White” Then
    FileCharges = True
    Else
    FileCharges = False
    End If

    San Francisco prosecutors turn to AI to reduce racial bias

    June 12, 2019

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — In a first-of-its kind experiment, San Francisco prosecutors are turning to artificial intelligence to reduce racial bias in the courts, adopting a system that strips certain identifying details from police reports and leaves only key facts to govern charging decisions.

    District Attorney George Gascon announced Wednesday that his office will begin using the technology in July to “take race out of the equation” when deciding whether to accuse suspects of a crime.

    Criminal-justice experts say they have never heard of any project like it, and they applauded the idea as a creative, bold effort to make charging practices more colorblind…

    https://www.apnews.com/7e9305d3bccf4f8caee9960e772079f7

    • Replies: @Mr. Rational

    San Francisco prosecutors turn to AI to reduce racial bias
     
    We already know that AIs trained on data like scholastic and criminal records and records of re-offenses come out as "rabid racists," aka realists.

    If Race = “White” Then
    FileCharges = True
    Else
    FileCharges = False
    End If

     
    It would literally have to be that "woke".
    , @nokangaroos
    - As usual, sounds good in theory but the really smart money is on just one more intransparent way of tweaking the outcomes (didn´t work in Chicago either), which in turn are the system´s input parameter for "bias".

    On second thought this might backfire - AI is incapable of cognitive dissonance i.e. the machine cannot say "ahrm well institutional microconstruct of vulnerable zip privilege" but will QUANTIFY all correlations and biases and give you the exact anti-White bias (over and above the current one) necessary to achieve equality of outcome.

    - I doubt their intent really was to make justice colorblind, so this is either CYA ("Our SPLC-approved Decolorizer (tm) Core CANNOT be racist!") or they are not going to like the numbers one bit.
    Don´t you just love the smell of FOIA in the morning ? :P

    , @Glock45
    Utopia awaits. San Francisco leads the way. AI to determine when criminal charges are filled.

    Hilarity ensues when ever greater numbers of blacks are arrested for crimes.

    AI won't worry about being accused of being "racist" because AI has no feelings, reputation, or a job to protect.

    This is just more make-believe shitlib thinking that is GUARANTEED to backfire, and we should all get ready with the "I told you so's" when it does.

    The shitlibs did the same stunt with bodycams, which, they insisted, would show poor, sweet innocent negroes being abused and brutalized by "racist cops."

    ...turns out the bodycams showed that blacks really are a bunch of violent criminals after all, and are not the sweet, innocent cherubs as shown on the talmudvision.
    , @Achmed E. Newman
    Oops, FSR, I see that you are the original code monkey, so LOL.
    , @Raccoon
    FSR, I'm sure that a simple algorithm would sort the sheep from the goats, without determination of "race".

    First Name (used to be called a "Christian name", but is now a "heathen name"):

    If it doesn't appear in a 1950s or 1960s edition of "Baby Names for Boys and Girls", then FileCharges=False
    Else
    FileCharges=True

    No need at all to mention race, which of course is raaaayciss in itself.

  49. @Feedsackroad
    Utopia awaits. San Francisco leads the way. AI to determine when criminal charges are filled.

    Let me help.

    If Race = "White" Then
    FileCharges = True
    Else
    FileCharges = False
    End If

    San Francisco prosecutors turn to AI to reduce racial bias

    June 12, 2019

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — In a first-of-its kind experiment, San Francisco prosecutors are turning to artificial intelligence to reduce racial bias in the courts, adopting a system that strips certain identifying details from police reports and leaves only key facts to govern charging decisions.

    District Attorney George Gascon announced Wednesday that his office will begin using the technology in July to “take race out of the equation” when deciding whether to accuse suspects of a crime.

    Criminal-justice experts say they have never heard of any project like it, and they applauded the idea as a creative, bold effort to make charging practices more colorblind...

    https://www.apnews.com/7e9305d3bccf4f8caee9960e772079f7

    San Francisco prosecutors turn to AI to reduce racial bias

    We already know that AIs trained on data like scholastic and criminal records and records of re-offenses come out as “rabid racists,” aka realists.

    If Race = “White” Then
    FileCharges = True
    Else
    FileCharges = False
    End If

    It would literally have to be that “woke”.

    • LOL: Achmed E. Newman
  50. Anon[126] • Disclaimer says:
    @Feedsackroad
    OT: A little background: The problem people accuse a local restaurant of racism. The restaurant owner, Captain Steve, responds with his version and surveillance video of the events. The entire response is too lengthy to post here but these excerpts pretty much sum it up. We're all familiar with the tactics of the problem people.

    From there, certain members of the group, began to argue loudly and raise their voices. This is occurring in the entrance to a large dining room where many people are dining and attempting to enjoy their meal.

    One particular member of the party flew into a rage and had to be escorted out by members of her own group. She was cursing and screaming and could be heard well above the sound of an already crowded restaurant.

    'Restaurant Responds To Accusations Of Racism With Statement And Surveillance Video'

    June 14, 2019

    Captain Steve’s has broken its silence about an incident that occurred on June 1st at their Fort Mill location, which sparked accusations of racism against the restaurant and its employees...

    https://www.wccbcharlotte.com/2019/06/14/another-restaurant-under-fire-accused-of-racism/

    “It’s about how we was treated, how we was thrown out on my husband’s birthday. We didn’t get to go have no cake and ice cream because we already go back to the house,” said Sylvia Blair.

    Poor them. The only thing worse than blacks in restaurants is large groups of blacks in restaurants. At least nobody got to be their server and lose out on tip money or even waste their time with them.

  51. @Feedsackroad
    Utopia awaits. San Francisco leads the way. AI to determine when criminal charges are filled.

    Let me help.

    If Race = "White" Then
    FileCharges = True
    Else
    FileCharges = False
    End If

    San Francisco prosecutors turn to AI to reduce racial bias

    June 12, 2019

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — In a first-of-its kind experiment, San Francisco prosecutors are turning to artificial intelligence to reduce racial bias in the courts, adopting a system that strips certain identifying details from police reports and leaves only key facts to govern charging decisions.

    District Attorney George Gascon announced Wednesday that his office will begin using the technology in July to “take race out of the equation” when deciding whether to accuse suspects of a crime.

    Criminal-justice experts say they have never heard of any project like it, and they applauded the idea as a creative, bold effort to make charging practices more colorblind...

    https://www.apnews.com/7e9305d3bccf4f8caee9960e772079f7

    – As usual, sounds good in theory but the really smart money is on just one more intransparent way of tweaking the outcomes (didn´t work in Chicago either), which in turn are the system´s input parameter for “bias”.

    On second thought this might backfire – AI is incapable of cognitive dissonance i.e. the machine cannot say “ahrm well institutional microconstruct of vulnerable zip privilege” but will QUANTIFY all correlations and biases and give you the exact anti-White bias (over and above the current one) necessary to achieve equality of outcome.

    – I doubt their intent really was to make justice colorblind, so this is either CYA (“Our SPLC-approved Decolorizer ™ Core CANNOT be racist!”) or they are not going to like the numbers one bit.
    Don´t you just love the smell of FOIA in the morning ? 😛

    • Agree: Mr. Rational
  52. @Jim in Jersey
    For $50?

    Throw the piece of shit out and buy your next one. Or trade it in at the store you’re buying the new one from.

    Meeting two nogs on the street -unarmed - is a recipe for disaster.

    Here’s an idea, give your kid the $50 and throw it out yourself. Tell him you sold it for him.

    I couldn’t imagine a scenario as described here. I don’t want to.

    Cities would burn.

    When I used to sell items on Craig’s List, I always kept a gun in my pocket. Nowadays, I don’t want anybody visiting my house from online sales sites.

  53. @Feedsackroad
    Utopia awaits. San Francisco leads the way. AI to determine when criminal charges are filled.

    Let me help.

    If Race = "White" Then
    FileCharges = True
    Else
    FileCharges = False
    End If

    San Francisco prosecutors turn to AI to reduce racial bias

    June 12, 2019

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — In a first-of-its kind experiment, San Francisco prosecutors are turning to artificial intelligence to reduce racial bias in the courts, adopting a system that strips certain identifying details from police reports and leaves only key facts to govern charging decisions.

    District Attorney George Gascon announced Wednesday that his office will begin using the technology in July to “take race out of the equation” when deciding whether to accuse suspects of a crime.

    Criminal-justice experts say they have never heard of any project like it, and they applauded the idea as a creative, bold effort to make charging practices more colorblind...

    https://www.apnews.com/7e9305d3bccf4f8caee9960e772079f7

    Utopia awaits. San Francisco leads the way. AI to determine when criminal charges are filled.

    Hilarity ensues when ever greater numbers of blacks are arrested for crimes.

    AI won’t worry about being accused of being “racist” because AI has no feelings, reputation, or a job to protect.

    This is just more make-believe shitlib thinking that is GUARANTEED to backfire, and we should all get ready with the “I told you so’s” when it does.

    The shitlibs did the same stunt with bodycams, which, they insisted, would show poor, sweet innocent negroes being abused and brutalized by “racist cops.”

    …turns out the bodycams showed that blacks really are a bunch of violent criminals after all, and are not the sweet, innocent cherubs as shown on the talmudvision.

  54. AWM says:

    Having used to run a Pharmacy in an “economically depressed” area I was once asked why I thought the young black males wore their pants falling off their ass.

    I just told them I figured it was a “Down Low” thing, after all, what other explanation could there be?
    Clearly they are signaling to other young black males, as well as females, that they are good for a little action, any action. The STD rates confirm my suspicions. So there you are. The poof is in the pudding, or something like that.

    After that, they never asked me about any of that stupid shit again.

  55. @Feedsackroad
    Utopia awaits. San Francisco leads the way. AI to determine when criminal charges are filled.

    Let me help.

    If Race = "White" Then
    FileCharges = True
    Else
    FileCharges = False
    End If

    San Francisco prosecutors turn to AI to reduce racial bias

    June 12, 2019

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — In a first-of-its kind experiment, San Francisco prosecutors are turning to artificial intelligence to reduce racial bias in the courts, adopting a system that strips certain identifying details from police reports and leaves only key facts to govern charging decisions.

    District Attorney George Gascon announced Wednesday that his office will begin using the technology in July to “take race out of the equation” when deciding whether to accuse suspects of a crime.

    Criminal-justice experts say they have never heard of any project like it, and they applauded the idea as a creative, bold effort to make charging practices more colorblind...

    https://www.apnews.com/7e9305d3bccf4f8caee9960e772079f7

    Oops, FSR, I see that you are the original code monkey, so LOL.

  56. @Bill Jones
    I remember strolling along the Kings Rd in London in the late 70's?
    Seeing my first proto-punks, I couldn't believe that these morons, presenting themselves as bad-asses had a chain of safety pins linking their nostril and earlobe,
    Never had any trouble with them.

    Haha! Same thoughts I had on this too, Bill. It’s even worse. It’s one thing to lose your pants and just keep on running, but another to catch that chain on the top of a chain link fence and rip a chunk of your nose off, or earlobe, or whatever is the weakest link in the chain (idiom intended!). You may as well just get arrested.

  57. Anonymous[651] • Disclaimer says:

    Re: the restaurant story

    When I first read that, I thought perhaps the restaurant was at fault or had instituted a policy designed to preferentially affect blacks. I had never heard of a restaurant that wouldn’t seat a group that had made reservations at a certain time just because a few people hadn’t shown up.

    But then I realized what I had taken for granted–simple foresight, future/time orientation, etc. Of course, a large group of blacks would decide to show up to a crowded restaurant on a Saturday night without a reservation and expect to have a table for 18 immediately prepared for them. Furthermore, they wouldn’t see the imposition placed on the restaurant and other customers waiting for a table that setting up additional tables to accommodate 5 others that may or may not decide to show up after getting high in the next two to three hours.

    What was left unsaid in the restaurant’s defense of itself is that, aside from the manufactured outrage this incident caused, they were not in the least concerned about the “black dollars” they missed out on that night. What with all the food and drinks that were going to be sent back, the lack of tip that would be left, all the potential customers that would be driven to dine elsewhere upon seeing a large, racous group of blacks sitting in the middle of the dining area when they came to ask what the wait time was for a table was, and the high probability several of the party of 18 would likely skip out before pitching in for the bill, leading to it not getting paid in full, the restaurant was surely looking at a large net monetary loss from that group. In fact, when this all dies down, it will probably be a big win for this restaurant as blacks will now stay away since they’ve got the idea in their heads that it’s a racist establishment.

    • Replies: @Mr. Rational

    when this all dies down, it will probably be a big win for this restaurant as blacks will now stay away since they’ve got the idea in their heads that it’s a racist establishment.
     
    There may be something to this.  I recall another anonymous SBPDL commenter who'd been in the restaurant business.  They would do things like making blacks wait indefinitely to be seated while claiming that white customers had reservations, and otherwise just frustrate them until they went away.  That kept blacks from disrupting their business and scaring off their actual profitable customers.

    It's such a pity that you can't just do this legally and explicitly.  We have all learned why it was right, proper and necessary by seeing what happens when we are forbidden to "discriminate".  It's time for change:  change it back.
  58. @Anonymous
    Re: the restaurant story

    When I first read that, I thought perhaps the restaurant was at fault or had instituted a policy designed to preferentially affect blacks. I had never heard of a restaurant that wouldn't seat a group that had made reservations at a certain time just because a few people hadn't shown up.

    But then I realized what I had taken for granted--simple foresight, future/time orientation, etc. Of course, a large group of blacks would decide to show up to a crowded restaurant on a Saturday night without a reservation and expect to have a table for 18 immediately prepared for them. Furthermore, they wouldn't see the imposition placed on the restaurant and other customers waiting for a table that setting up additional tables to accommodate 5 others that may or may not decide to show up after getting high in the next two to three hours.

    What was left unsaid in the restaurant's defense of itself is that, aside from the manufactured outrage this incident caused, they were not in the least concerned about the "black dollars" they missed out on that night. What with all the food and drinks that were going to be sent back, the lack of tip that would be left, all the potential customers that would be driven to dine elsewhere upon seeing a large, racous group of blacks sitting in the middle of the dining area when they came to ask what the wait time was for a table was, and the high probability several of the party of 18 would likely skip out before pitching in for the bill, leading to it not getting paid in full, the restaurant was surely looking at a large net monetary loss from that group. In fact, when this all dies down, it will probably be a big win for this restaurant as blacks will now stay away since they've got the idea in their heads that it's a racist establishment.

    when this all dies down, it will probably be a big win for this restaurant as blacks will now stay away since they’ve got the idea in their heads that it’s a racist establishment.

    There may be something to this.  I recall another anonymous SBPDL commenter who’d been in the restaurant business.  They would do things like making blacks wait indefinitely to be seated while claiming that white customers had reservations, and otherwise just frustrate them until they went away.  That kept blacks from disrupting their business and scaring off their actual profitable customers.

    It’s such a pity that you can’t just do this legally and explicitly.  We have all learned why it was right, proper and necessary by seeing what happens when we are forbidden to “discriminate”.  It’s time for change:  change it back.

    • Agree: Jim in Jersey
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    I remember a manager of a place I used to go to years ago told a group of us that they made sure that their cheapest beer on tap cost at least 50 cents to a dollar more than the cheapest beer on the restaurants located nearby on this main street. This town had a decent sized black population which had been growing over the past two decades (now around 35-40%), but the blacks only seemed to frequent the places in town that had the cheapest beer and booze. Food prices did not factor into their decisions on where to go out. Even fifty cents less for a beer was enough to get most of the black business in town.

    The manager said at first, some places tried to monopolize the "black dollar" by tricking the blacks in town due to their unfamiliarity with the basics of math and desire to get the "best deal". They'd advertise "dollar drafts" which were only 8 ounce pours and get all the black business in town even though all the other places were selling 2 dollar pints of beer. Predictably, having a large black clientele eventually doomed these places as their bad behavior drove non-black customers away and after that happened, between the cheapness, destruction, and theft of their remaining black customers, the restaurants were forced to close. The restaurants in town eventually stopped offering drink "deals" after the first few who did shut down, but the blacks continued to zero in on whatever place had the cheapest beer and liquor. And inevitably, one by one, each of those places were forced to close. The manager said that by keeping their beer prices tolerable for their working class white customers but high enough to send blacks looking elsewhere, they have been able to stay in business for over 20 years while most other places in the area had a shelf life of only 5 years or less. I never knew if they practiced other legitimately discriminatory practices, but it wouldn't surprise me as keeping this demographic away was in the forefront of the minds of management and their regular customers.
  59. Anonymous[651] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Rational

    when this all dies down, it will probably be a big win for this restaurant as blacks will now stay away since they’ve got the idea in their heads that it’s a racist establishment.
     
    There may be something to this.  I recall another anonymous SBPDL commenter who'd been in the restaurant business.  They would do things like making blacks wait indefinitely to be seated while claiming that white customers had reservations, and otherwise just frustrate them until they went away.  That kept blacks from disrupting their business and scaring off their actual profitable customers.

    It's such a pity that you can't just do this legally and explicitly.  We have all learned why it was right, proper and necessary by seeing what happens when we are forbidden to "discriminate".  It's time for change:  change it back.

    I remember a manager of a place I used to go to years ago told a group of us that they made sure that their cheapest beer on tap cost at least 50 cents to a dollar more than the cheapest beer on the restaurants located nearby on this main street. This town had a decent sized black population which had been growing over the past two decades (now around 35-40%), but the blacks only seemed to frequent the places in town that had the cheapest beer and booze. Food prices did not factor into their decisions on where to go out. Even fifty cents less for a beer was enough to get most of the black business in town.

    The manager said at first, some places tried to monopolize the “black dollar” by tricking the blacks in town due to their unfamiliarity with the basics of math and desire to get the “best deal”. They’d advertise “dollar drafts” which were only 8 ounce pours and get all the black business in town even though all the other places were selling 2 dollar pints of beer. Predictably, having a large black clientele eventually doomed these places as their bad behavior drove non-black customers away and after that happened, between the cheapness, destruction, and theft of their remaining black customers, the restaurants were forced to close. The restaurants in town eventually stopped offering drink “deals” after the first few who did shut down, but the blacks continued to zero in on whatever place had the cheapest beer and liquor. And inevitably, one by one, each of those places were forced to close. The manager said that by keeping their beer prices tolerable for their working class white customers but high enough to send blacks looking elsewhere, they have been able to stay in business for over 20 years while most other places in the area had a shelf life of only 5 years or less. I never knew if they practiced other legitimately discriminatory practices, but it wouldn’t surprise me as keeping this demographic away was in the forefront of the minds of management and their regular customers.

    • Replies: @Jim in Jersey
    This is exactly right.

    Before you make the decision to chase ‘black dollars’ understand that they will eventually be the only dollars you’ll be receiving.

    A black clientele will push out the white clientele in no time flat.

    On the flip side, you can get away with selling the lowest quality of everything; beer, booze, food, snacks...you name it! Generic pretzels and grape drink, Colt 45 and Hennessy! Add some pre-made Restaurant Depot crap to themmenu and you’ve got yourself a restaurant!

    Now you can overserve your growing(in their seats) clientele as they battle “the sugars” and morbid obesity.

    If you survive the daily mingling without losing your life, you could likely make a good living for yourself.

    Anyone ever watch “Bar Rescue”? The most hysterical rescues are the negro bars and clubs.
  60. @Anonymous
    I remember a manager of a place I used to go to years ago told a group of us that they made sure that their cheapest beer on tap cost at least 50 cents to a dollar more than the cheapest beer on the restaurants located nearby on this main street. This town had a decent sized black population which had been growing over the past two decades (now around 35-40%), but the blacks only seemed to frequent the places in town that had the cheapest beer and booze. Food prices did not factor into their decisions on where to go out. Even fifty cents less for a beer was enough to get most of the black business in town.

    The manager said at first, some places tried to monopolize the "black dollar" by tricking the blacks in town due to their unfamiliarity with the basics of math and desire to get the "best deal". They'd advertise "dollar drafts" which were only 8 ounce pours and get all the black business in town even though all the other places were selling 2 dollar pints of beer. Predictably, having a large black clientele eventually doomed these places as their bad behavior drove non-black customers away and after that happened, between the cheapness, destruction, and theft of their remaining black customers, the restaurants were forced to close. The restaurants in town eventually stopped offering drink "deals" after the first few who did shut down, but the blacks continued to zero in on whatever place had the cheapest beer and liquor. And inevitably, one by one, each of those places were forced to close. The manager said that by keeping their beer prices tolerable for their working class white customers but high enough to send blacks looking elsewhere, they have been able to stay in business for over 20 years while most other places in the area had a shelf life of only 5 years or less. I never knew if they practiced other legitimately discriminatory practices, but it wouldn't surprise me as keeping this demographic away was in the forefront of the minds of management and their regular customers.

    This is exactly right.

    Before you make the decision to chase ‘black dollars’ understand that they will eventually be the only dollars you’ll be receiving.

    A black clientele will push out the white clientele in no time flat.

    On the flip side, you can get away with selling the lowest quality of everything; beer, booze, food, snacks…you name it! Generic pretzels and grape drink, Colt 45 and Hennessy! Add some pre-made Restaurant Depot crap to themmenu and you’ve got yourself a restaurant!

    Now you can overserve your growing(in their seats) clientele as they battle “the sugars” and morbid obesity.

    If you survive the daily mingling without losing your life, you could likely make a good living for yourself.

    Anyone ever watch “Bar Rescue”? The most hysterical rescues are the negro bars and clubs.

  61. @Feedsackroad
    Utopia awaits. San Francisco leads the way. AI to determine when criminal charges are filled.

    Let me help.

    If Race = "White" Then
    FileCharges = True
    Else
    FileCharges = False
    End If

    San Francisco prosecutors turn to AI to reduce racial bias

    June 12, 2019

    SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — In a first-of-its kind experiment, San Francisco prosecutors are turning to artificial intelligence to reduce racial bias in the courts, adopting a system that strips certain identifying details from police reports and leaves only key facts to govern charging decisions.

    District Attorney George Gascon announced Wednesday that his office will begin using the technology in July to “take race out of the equation” when deciding whether to accuse suspects of a crime.

    Criminal-justice experts say they have never heard of any project like it, and they applauded the idea as a creative, bold effort to make charging practices more colorblind...

    https://www.apnews.com/7e9305d3bccf4f8caee9960e772079f7

    FSR, I’m sure that a simple algorithm would sort the sheep from the goats, without determination of “race”.

    First Name (used to be called a “Christian name”, but is now a “heathen name”):

    If it doesn’t appear in a 1950s or 1960s edition of “Baby Names for Boys and Girls”, then FileCharges=False
    Else
    FileCharges=True

    No need at all to mention race, which of course is raaaayciss in itself.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Paul Kersey Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?