The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
Yours Truly, an Overzealous Ignoramus
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Now that the last embers of Fourth of July fireworks have died down, America has entered the summer vacation months, often described by journalists as the Silly Season. As might be expected, few things better typify this description than the activities of our nation’s desperate defenders of Spanish-almost-only instruction.

 

In Colorado, diehard advocates of that state’s bilingual education system long ago correctly realized that their best—perhaps their only— realistic chance of saving their failed programs from annihilation was to prevent voters from exercising their democratic rights at the ballot box, a task made easier by that state’s notoriously convoluted petition approval laws. To that end, bilingual activists filed an enormously long and exhaustive list of what I would regard as completely frivolous legal challenges to the ballot title and summary of our English for the Children initiative prepared by Colorado’s official State Title Board. These legal challenges, and the endless appeals and revised appeals they provoked consumed close to a full year of calendar time, during which we were legally precluded from beginning our qualifying petition drive. Finally, just a few weeks ago, Colorado’s State Supreme Court, whose members were almost entirely appointed by past liberal Democratic governors, issued its final and unanimous decision in our favor, allowing our signature-gathering for the November ballot to begin.

So far, so good. But this full year of legal wrangling reduced our permitted period for obtaining the 120,000 or so required signatures from the six months allowed under the Colorado constitution to little more than six weeks if we are to make our early August cut-off date. Obviously, gathering six months worth of signatures in just six weeks represents an enormously difficult test to meet, but the remarkable enthusiasm that our issue appears to have generated leaves me cautiously optimistic that we will ultimately succeed.

Certainly, our opponents appear to be growing quite desperate. At their Denver press conference held yesterday, they apparently became quite agitated in their language, characterizing yours truly as “an overzealous ignoramus” for opposing bilingual education, as well as reportedly throwing around even more wild charges of “racism” and claims that I was a “meddlesome foreigner,” presumably because my permanent abode is in the Sovereign Nation of Palo Alto, California. Considering that five separate statewide polls by major media organizations during the last year have shown our measure enjoying a lead of around 45 percentage points among Colorado voters, such desperation is quite warranted. I am attaching a news story on these Colorado developments.

Meanwhile, our equally desperate opponents in Massachusetts have taken a completely different tack. There, our signature drive concluded weeks ago, and we have already been officially notified that our measure will appear on the November ballot.

ORDER IT NOW

This state of affairs has become a matter of enormous embarrassment to the Massachusetts Legislature, which has for the past sixteen years annually debated various proposed bilingual education reform bills without ever actually passing a single one. In 1971, Massachusetts became the first state in America to establish a statewide requirement for bilingual education, and although that extraordinarily harsh system of mandatory native-language instruction has been the subject of endless negative media coverage and condemnatory editorials, not a single word of that law has been changed in the past 31 years.

Faced with the very real and humiliating prospect of the voters doing within a few weeks what elected officials had avoided for 31 years, the Massachusetts House yesterday passed by an overwhelming margin a package of alleged reforms, which actually do almost nothing aside from providing politicians with the excuse that they have indeed done something.

One of the few significant elements of the proposed Massachusetts reform is that it would for the first time require that bilingual teachers actually know English. Presumably in another 31 years, the Massachusetts Legislature might pass an additional measure requiring them to teach English as well.

 
• Category: Race/Ethnicity • Tags: Bilingual Education 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Unz Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?