The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
Silly Assessments
Letter to the Editor
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I appreciated John Maggs’ thoughtful article on ballot initiatives (“Ballot Boxing,” 7/1/2000, p. 2144) but have a few comments.

First, Peter Schrag’s book on the harmful consequences of Proposition 13 in California claims that by limiting property taxes, that landmark measure resulted in decades of “disinvestment” in California’s public schools, and their consequent decline; and Maggs cites this argument without comment.

Although such a claim may have surface appeal, the actual statistics prove that it is very silly indeed. During the 25 years surrounding the passage of Prop. 13, per student spending in California public schools actually rose by about 150 percent in real terms. And while Schrag, a somewhat doctrinaire liberal, might regard a huge rise in real spending as “disinvestment,” few others would. The actual cause of educational decline was the growth and expansion of a whole series of disastrously unsuccessful curricular innovations such as whole language, bilingual education, and fuzzy math, and the rollback of these failed ideas has led the way back to improved test scores.

Second, Maggs suggests that David Broder’s rather negative book on initiatives cites my own anti-bilingual education measure, Prop. 227, as a prime example of the dangers of the initiative process. To the contrary, the few pages Broder devotes to my campaign are not at all critical, but are instead actually rather favorable. Furthermore, when Broder’s book tour brought him to Palo Alto, his speech before the Commonwealth Club singled out my initiative campaigns for praise, while he signed my copy of his book with the remarks that my efforts probably represented the “original intent” of the idealistic reformers who established the initiative process.

Finally, the victory of Prop. 227 in June 1998 tends to confirm Maggs’ suggestion that Broder may be exaggerating the power of money in initiative campaigns. Besides being strongly opposed by the political establishments of both parties, our “English for the Children” measure was outspent by some 25-to-1 in advertising, yet still won one of the largest landslide victories of any initiative since Prop. 13 in 1978. The rapid and dramatic subsequent rise in the academic performance of 1.4 million immigrant students in California shows that the voters were right and the politicians were wrong about dismantling bilingual education. The voters of Arizona will have the same opportunity this November.

– Ron Unz, Palo Alto, Calif.

(The writer is author of Propositions 227 and 25.)

(Republished from The National Journal (Letters) by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology 
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Unz Comments via RSS
Personal Classics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?