The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Ron Unz ArchiveBlogview
American Pravda: The KKK and Mass Racial Killings
shutterstock_339962798

Over the last few decades, I doubt that any American political organization has received greater negative attention in our national news and entertainment media than the Ku Klux Klan, or KKK. For example, although white activist David Duke left that group over 35 years ago, the media still often identifies him as one of its former leaders, and partly as a consequence Duke’s support for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has regularly been treated as headline news.

Such massive coverage may be objectively demonstrated. Googling “KKK” yields over 72 million results, considerably more than the joint total for “Communist” and “Communists,” and well over twice what you get for “Communism.” Such prominence seems rather excessive, given that throughout most of the 20th century, Communism controlled some one-third of the world’s population, and the resulting political conflict periodically threatened to unleash global thermonuclear war. Even today, a self-described Communist Party governs China, a nation 1.4 billion strong, which by some measures has now passed the U.S. to become the world’s largest economy. Meanwhile, the last time the KKK held any significant political power was almost 100 years ago, during its Midwestern heyday of the 1920s.

And if we focus on the sanguinary consequences of the two movements, the imbalance is even greater. The famous Black Book of Communism, published in 1991, claimed that across the 20th century, Communist regimes had racked up a peacetime total of roughly 100 million human fatalities, and although that latter figure has been widely disputed as a considerable exaggeration, the true number is surely in the many tens of millions, with merely the famine deaths induced by Mao’s disastrous Great Leap Forward of 1959-1961 usually pegged at 35 million or more.

Meanwhile, the victims of the notorious KKK seem rather fewer in number. The Wikipedia entry for the KKK is over twice as long as that for Communism, and hardly seeks to airbrush the misdeeds of that violent organization, but only manages to provide some 15 murder victims, all listed by name, drawn from the combined decades of the 1950s and 1960s, which represented the height of the Klan’s modern power. This apparent gap between 15 deaths and perhaps 70,000,000 or so seems rather wide.

Not only does the KKK total pale in comparison with Stalin and his considerable body-count, but during its two decades of greatest infamy all those hundreds or thousands of armed Klansmen accounted for fewer victims than the number sometimes sent to the Chicago city morgue over a long holiday weekend these days, let alone what various half-forgotten teenage spree-killers produced during their individual short rampages. For example, a decade ago disgruntled Virginia Tech student Seung-Hui Cho killed 33 people within a couple of hours, and he hardly remains a household name these days. Meanwhile, the last of those infamous 15 KKK racial killings took place a full half-century ago.

A considerable disproportionality between media attention and actual activity seems undeniable.

However, there are obviously some mitigating factors in this critique. Communism never came to America in serious form, while the ideological foundations of our culture these days tend to regard racial killings by organized groups as particularly heinous offenses, especially when these are aimed at inflicting terror. By contrast, lunatics attacking their classmates or drug-dealers disputing their business transactions are committing much more mundane offenses. So under this particular victimological standard, the 15 victims of the KKK over the two decades from 1950 more reasonably justify the massive attention they have received.

Furthermore, America has always been fascinated with killings that take place over an extended period of months or years, especially if they involve some sort of unusual pattern, with the monikers of strange serial killers often resonating for decades. There was Richard Ramirez, the Los Angeles Night Stalker, an avowed Satanist who slaughtered at least fourteen victims, mostly in the Los Angeles area during 1985. And who can forget Jeffrey Dahmer, the Milwaukee Cannibal, who killed and devoured some 17 young men in a career spanning a dozen years? So the unusual circumstances or motivation of such murders can easily compensate for the relative lack of raw numbers, and surely this helps to explain the enormous attention paid to the KKK’s rather meager list of actual victims.

As an extreme example of the importance of murder quality over murder quantity, there was the famed Zodiac Killer who prowled Northern California during the late 1960s and early 1970s, but was never caught. Although he may have accounted for as few as five actual victims, the sensational nature of the case inspired several movies and many dozens of books, while the fictionalized plotline of a serial killer who sends taunting letters to the newspapers has probably been repeated in scores of television crime episodes and films. As a child growing up in Southern California, the phrase “Zodiac Killer” was certainly familiar to me.

But oddly enough, another long series of killings centered in that same time and place has received far less attention. When I first encountered mention of the “Zebra killings” some years ago, the term was completely unfamiliar to me, and due to the similarities in name and location, I initially wondered whether it might be an alternate designation for the Zodiac attacks. But despite the chronological and geographical overlap, the Zebra case was actually quite different, and given its explosive details the almost total absence of any subsequent media attention is really quite curious.

Indeed, one advantage of exploring the Zebra killings is there exists only one detailed, somewhat contemporaneous account, and a couple of years ago with my curiosity getting the better of me, I finally ordered the book from Amazon. Zebra was published in 1979 by Clark Howard, an award-winning crime writer, who drew extensively on newspaper archives, court testimony, and personal interviews, with his text running over 400 pages.

ORDER IT NOW

ZebraHoward The story of the Zebra killers almost sounds like something out of a movie, although no movie was ever made. For decades, the Nation of Islam—the so-called “Black Muslims”—had been preaching that whites were “devils,” the product of a mad scientist’s controlled-breeding experiment, and that killing such “devils” was a virtuous religious act. Then, some time in 1972, certain elements of the sect decided to transform religious dogma into actual practice, and began an organized campaign to randomly kill as many white men, women, and children as they could, with the attacks occurring throughout California but especially centered in the Bay Area and the city of San Francisco. One of the alleged motives was to terrorize the local whites into eventually fleeing that city, thereby allowing the establishment of a black-dominated metropolis.

The black attackers typically went out alone or in pairs to commit the killings, usually selecting any seemingly vulnerable victims on the streets at dusk or in the dark, with their weapons of choice being guns, hatchets, or machetes. Sometimes, victims were kidnapped and brought back to safe-houses to be tortured and killed by the entire group, with their bodies afterward dismembered and discarded.

According to the later court testimony, black participants each needed to kill a total of nine white men to be awarded the coveted title of “Death Angel,” earning them the right to have their photos displayed in the Black Muslim meeting halls, while roughly double points were awarded for slaughtering white women or children, on the grounds that such killings were more psychologically difficult. Based on the number of such distinctive homicides—well-dressed black men randomly attacking whites on the street—police officials estimated that there were over 70 such killings throughout California, though based on his extensive research Howard himself believed that the true statewide total may have been close to 270 dead victims.

The period of the killings lasted for almost half a year, and once the newspapers and public grew aware of the situation, the city of San Francisco became gripped by a sense of terror, with public officials desperate to crack the case. Sometimes even politically-connected individuals fell victim, with future mayor Art Agnos barely surviving a random gunshot attack. In desperation, Mayor Joseph Alioto, a staunch liberal, initiated stop-and-search patrols that targeted a majority of the local population of adult black males as possible killers. Eventually, eight of the suspects were arrested with the aid of an informant, with four of these being convicted and sentenced to life, at which point the attacks ceased. But it appears that the majority of the participants were never caught, let alone punished.

Zebra may be purchased for as little as $4 on Amazon, shipping included, and also found online both as a PDF and in various other formats at Archive.org. But for those too busy to read it, a much shorter summary of the story may be found in an article entitled “Remembering the Zebra Killing” published in 2001 by conservative writer James Lubinskas, with his presentation closely matching the book’s facts, while the San Francisco Chronicle also ran a short retrospective around the time of the 2002 DC Sniper Attacks. There are also a handful of other small websites here and there, discussing the case and republishing some newspaper articles, including coverage of the Zebra killings in other cities.

Meanwhile, the events themselves have almost totally disappeared from public memory. When noted author David Talbot published his widely-praised 2012 book Season of the Witch covering that general era of San Francisco history, he included a discussion of the Zebra killings, and some knowledgeable San Francisco natives mentioned that it was the first time they had ever heard of the story. Indeed, the complete absence of any subsequent media coverage or investigation forced Talbot, a mainstream liberal, to cite an obscure white racialist blogsite devoted to the Zebra case as one of his only sources of documentary information on the wave of murders.

Not only did the Zebra killings represent the greatest instance of racially-motivated killings in modern American history, but the number of victims was quite possibly greater than the combined total for all other such examples over nearly the last 100 years of our history. Based on that reality, the near-absolute media blackout has been quite remarkably Orwellian and deeply disturbing. Prior to the development of the Internet, neither I nor almost anyone else would have ever encountered this important history, and I suspect that if anyone had presented us with the true facts back then, his claims might easily have been dismissed as the ravings of a lunatic.

 

We naively tend to assume that our media accurately reflects the events of our world and its history, but instead what we all too often see are only the tremendously distorted images of a circus fun-house mirror, with small items sometimes transformed into large ones, and large ones into small. The contours of historical reality may be warped into almost unrecognizable shapes, with some important elements completely disappearing from the record and others appearing out of nowhere. I’ve often suggested that the media creates our reality, but given such glaring omissions and distortions, the reality produced is often largely fictional. Our standard histories have always criticized the ludicrous Soviet propaganda during the height of Stalin’s purges or the Ukrainian famine, but in its own way, our own media organs sometimes seem just as dishonest and absurd in their own reporting. And until the availability of the Internet, it was difficult for most of us to ever recognize the enormity of this problem.

Just a couple of weeks ago it was discovered that an attractive white teenage girl had been kidnapped by a group of black men in Florida, held captive and gang-raped for days, then finally killed and discarded, with her body fed to alligators. I found no mention of this grotesque tale in any of my major national newspapers, even as The New York Times reported that Hollywood was in the planning stages of three different major movies about the infamous Emmett Till murder case from 60 years ago. By hiding certain events and heavily emphasizing others, our media apparatus can create any desired picture of the world, and until recently almost none of us would have been the wiser.

The Black Lives Matter movement has increasingly dominated our political discourse for the last couple of years, and its protests have led to major shifts in policing policy, with some critics claiming that these changes have been responsible for a large, unexpected spike in urban homicides in some heavily black cities. But as near as I can tell, many of the major incidents sparking that movement were more or less complete media hoaxes, and quickly revealed as such to anyone who even casually consulted the unfiltered information available on the Internet, thereby avoiding the dishonest MSM gatekeepers.

For example, Trayvon Martin seems to have been a violent young thug and his antagonist, George Zimmerman, a half-Hispanic Dudley-Do-Right, whose main offense was attempting to defend himself while at risk of being beaten to death after he was attacked late at night without provocation in his own community. Similarly, Michael Brown of Ferguson fame was a gigantic, thuggish criminal, who casually committed the strong-arm robbery of a convenience store at night, then suddenly attacked the local police officer who attempted to stop and question him soon afterward.

These and many of the other BLM incidents would hardly seem likely to inspire mass public outrage, whether among blacks or anyone else, except that our dishonest media successfully transformed them into things they were not, thereby agitating the ignorant and the gullible, with prominent media pundits sometimes themselves stunned at the total avoidance of the true facts. I have little doubt that during the 1930s Soviet Pravda managed to instill boiling outrage among ordinary Russians when it fabricated all the monstrous crimes and horrific treacheries purportedly committed by the Trotskyite wreckers and other political deviationists.

In fact, the evidence suggests that the overwhelming majority of all racially-motivated violent attacks in America each year are committed by blacks, usually against whites, though sometimes against Asians or Hispanics. But these attacks are almost always ignored by the media, while the newscasters and politicians seem almost desperate to shine a spotlight on any that occur in the opposite direction, even if they are almost nowhere to be found. Indeed, a few years ago I pointed out that for decades the statistical correlation across all our urban centers between the prevalence of blacks and the prevalence of serious crime has been among the highest found anywhere in the social sciences, strongly suggesting that marginal urban crime is essentially a black phenomenon. But individuals who form their view of the world primarily from our mainstream media would probably remain unaware of these important facts. Before the Internet, only gossip and rumor might have challenged media-endorsed falsehoods.

A pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long produces obvious consequences. On a whole range of issues, certainly including racial ones, the American media may be fast approaching the point of possessing negative credibility, with increasing numbers of people tending to assume that the facts may be exactly opposite to what the media claims.

This is hardly unprecedented. During the 1970s I read Edgar Snow’s fascinating books on Maoist China, wherein a shrewd peasant once told the author how easy it was to disentangle reality from official news reports: if the media launched a huge propaganda campaign emphasizing the tremendous safety of Chinese railways, then surely some horrific train wreck must have recently occurred. It’s sad to consider that many Americans may be beginning to follow similar rules.

Consider a biological metaphor. When soft flesh suffers a serious wound, scar tissue protectively forms, and the eventual result is a new skin integument usually tougher and more resistant than the original. Thus, long after the damage has been repaired, left behind is a permanent, telltale marker of defensive overcompensation. Media narratives aimed at hiding unpleasant facts sometimes seem to follow that same pattern of overcompensation, producing an inverted reality that may provide a useful clue to the suppressed truth.

For example, last year I published an article examining the considerable evidence that John McCain’s true wartime record in Vietnam may have been one of a notorious enemy collaborator, but that the dishonest effort to obscure or excuse the reality of his treachery took on a life of its own, and growing enormously over time, eventually established him in the mind of the public as one of America’s most patriotic war-heroes.

Or consider the fascinating historical case of Emmett Till, mentioned earlier, whose murder in 1955 became the archetypal case of an innocent black youngster lynched by murderous Southern whites, perhaps even lending some inspiration to Harper Lee’s public school classic To Kill a Mockingbird. There was enormous national media coverage of the Till murder, which uniformly reported that the black fourteen-year-old child had merely made rude and provocative remarks to the young wife of a white shopkeeper—a “Wolf whistle”—leading to his abduction and brutal killing. Yet oddly enough, only long afterward did it emerge out that his father, a violent criminal, had been executed for multiple rapes and murder, and that Till himself, weighing 150 pounds and quite large and muscular for his age, also had a violent history. Indeed, these facts had remained totally unknown to me until quite recently.

When we discover that the media has shamelessly concealed certain potentially significant details, we may naturally wonder what else might have remained permanently hidden in those pre-Internet days. I’ve sometimes wondered whether Till’s actions may have been far more substantial than merely a harmless “wolf whistle,” perhaps even amounting to some sort of sexual assault, with his killing therefore being the sort of rough justice not uncommon in backward rural communities. Under such a hypothetical scenario, the husband of his victim would surely have made every effort to conceal from public knowledge the terrible indignity of the actual attack his wife had suffered. Perhaps such disturbing speculation is mistaken, but given the revealed pattern of deception, I do not think it is entirely unwarranted. In pre-Internet days, Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown might have easily joined Till in the roster of tragically martyred youngsters.

ORDER IT NOW

A long history of overwhelming media dishonesty may produce broader consequences that many may find distressing. The public remarks of Donald Trump often seem quite ignorant or even ridiculous, and surely no presidential candidate in the last one hundred years has been subjected to such strong and uniformly hostile media coverage. Yet the insular members of the Fourth Estate have been stunned that their endless attacks and denunciations have had so little impact upon public opinion, with Trump having recently regained the national lead in several presidential polls. Surely journalists must realize that decades of deceit have stretched their credibility past the breaking point on a whole range of sensitive issues, with huge numbers of voters simply disregarding anything said about Trump in what they consider “the lying press.”

Once Americans conclude that our supposedly objective media functions merely as a corrupt propaganda machine, why should the statements of prominent establishment pundits or reporters count for anything more than the sarcastic Tweets of some angry, anonymous blogger? Those who have allowed the currency of journalistic integrity to become totally debased have only themselves to blame when they discover it is no longer accepted by the general public.

 
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
The American Pravda Series
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
[Filtered by Reply Thread]
  1. I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it’s collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan’s pro-ww1 activites, and it’s alliance with woodrow wilson’s blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    • Replies: @deplorable frog
    its true that Zimmerman should have "backed down", but there was no reason for Martin to assault him. If someone follows you from a distance, you don't turn around and deliberately confront them, and then attack them

    that kind of terrible judgement, and the subsequent details of Martin's life revealed through the fiasco showed that Martin really was a low-life thug and a criminal waiting to happen, and that Zimmerman's instincts about Martin being trouble were correct from the beginning.
    , @Jim Christian
    Nah, fuck Trayon. He was in the neighborhood to steal, he didn't live there. Like with the cop and Michael Brown, Zimmerman was an inconvenience to his prowling and he was enraged because: Black privilege to steal. And like Michael Brown, the criminal Travon assaulted someone he shouldn't have and got what was coming to him like any thug. The jury let Zimmerman go. But the cops knew what they knew, they covered it, cowed by the press as they were. Furthermore, the Black-run Federal government, try as mightily as they possibly could to blame the cop, had to admit the truth, much too late as even they knew the truth immediately (never waste a good opportunity). They KNEW Michael Brown, from the start of the investigation, initiated the fight with the cop. But to allow plenty of time for #Blacklivesmatter and all that came from that, they withheld the truth. The Feds knew from the outset that "Hands up don't shoot" was a fucking lie and they held out the truth for months.

    Spare us your platitudes about disagreeable material. Dragging out the benign WASPS is ridiculous. This is Black America at it's finest and YOUR objections on the reportage is just more coverup. You are of the very same reprehensible element that would put the mothers of certified criminal psychopaths on the stage of the Democrat National Convention. These are the mothers of criminal Blacks justifiably killed in righteous police shootings by those commissioned to protect us. And these mothers are celebrated for the monsters THEY created that the arm of the law put down. Don't turn reality upside down, Bob. This is 2016, not the KKK of the 40s-70s, who were all Democrats in any case.

    , @Jonathan Revusky

    I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material.
     
    I'd have to second that. I have also found Ron's articles to be consistently very worthwhile, but this one is really a very bad article. It made me cringe to read it. On the Trayvon Martin thing, I think a fair-minded assessment is that we simply don't know what happened. There were two people who did know. One is dead and the other has every reason to be less than truthful.

    I think the worst aspect of the article is his treatment of this Zebra murders case. This recently came to my attention because Steve Sailer alluded to it. I had not heard of the case. I went and looked at the wikipedia page and did some googling and it immediately struck me that the official version of events must be a total fiction. I wrote a response to that here:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/gerald-early-on-muhammad-ali/#comment-1443598

    Sailer never deigned to respond to me. Ron writes here:


    According to the later court testimony, black participants each needed to kill a total of nine white men to be awarded the coveted title of “Death Angel,” earning them the right to have their photos displayed in the Black Muslim meeting halls, while roughly double points were awarded for slaughtering white women or children, on the grounds that such killings were more psychologically difficult.
     
    The above looks utterly preposterous to me. What really happened is something quite different, I assume. For starters, it looks impossible simply because all of these groups are (and were) completely infiltrated by agents of the State.

    But, in general, the idea that people went to a temple or mosque, a place of worship, and were recruited to kill random white people and then they were going to have their pictures put on the wall.... a person with a certain level of BDQ has to be skeptical of such a narrative, I think.

    Look, the business of the Nation of Islam having some weird theology where they say that white folks are collectively the devil or the spawn of the devil -- that really has nothing to do with the notion that the NOI was actively encouraging their members to go kill random white people. The rank and file of NOI, as far as I can tell, are actually quite law abiding religious people. Even leaving aside the issue that all these groups were infiltrated and could not conduct a killing campaign over a period of half a year without the authorities knowing about it, the whole notion that, within the NOI, they are openly discussing killing random white people and everybody there is somehow okay with that -- this is all preposterous, and that Ron Unz takes this at face value is rather cringeworthy.

    My reading of the situation is that the Zebra murders were a Deep State psyop since it is impossible for a group like NOI to just be plotting and carrying out these murders without the organs of the State knowing about it. Certainly not for half a year. Probably the people they did ultimately imprison were patsies of some sort and framed for it. If that is the case, and the real killers were never caught, that could well be because there was no intention of catching them. If this was a psyop, as I suspect, the reason is obvious. It gives them a pretext for a violent crackdown on this group that they don't like. Okay, it doesn't seem that such a crackdown followed, but they would have been setting up the narrative.

    All the above said, as in the Trayvon Martin case, I simply don't know what really did happen. However, I see no sign that Ron Unz does either.
    , @Chico
    I agree. Many if not most adolescent males in urban or suburban areas have had the unpleasant experiance of being stalked by a "chickenhawk." Happened to me and my friends in the 1970s, This started when we were 12-13 years old, we had to run. It must be ten times worse now with gay liberation and discrimination laws.

    To Trayvon, Zimmerman probably looked like a creep stalker like Jeff Dahmer following him down an alley.

    Spoiled a good article.

    , @Randal

    nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor.
     
    The honest truth is that nobody knows exactly how the confrontation developed, so the only way to reach a conclusion such as yours is to make extensive assumptions and to disbelieve Zimmerman's own account.

    Personally, given the general nature of Martin (which was, as Unz suggests, a violent, personally aggressive and physically confident young thug), Zimmerman's account of how the actual fight began is perfectly plausible. That kind of ""who you looking at?" confrontation followed by physical aggression is commonplace amongst young thugs, and especially black ones, as anyone who's ever been young ought to have learned from experience.

    But you are incorrect in your rather self-serving assertion that a physical confrontation of a suspected follower is the "reasonable" response. The reasonable response from somebody normal who wants to avoid unnecessary violence, if followed by a stranger at night, is either to avoid confrontation or to confront in a manner that avoids violence. As far as we know, Zimmerman had lost track of Martin before he was attacked. There was nothing we know of that would have prevented Martin from just going home safely, if he had chosen that course of action.

    As I pointed out, we have no direct knowledge of how the confrontation developed except Zimmerman's own evidence. But the overall circumstances, of Zimmerman being a concerned, basically defensive neighbourhood watch type in his own area, and the more mature of the two, and Martin being an aggressive young thug, should give the benefit of the doubt to Zimmerman every time unless there is strong evidence to doubt it.

    Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist
     
    Unz's point is clearly that it would not be at all surprising if he had, and that the pattern of US media deception means that the lack of reporting of such actions cannot be regarded as evidence to suggest that it didn't happen.

    The standard here is not that of a trial, but rather the historical one of balance of possibilities.
    , @silly billy
    The case of "white" George Zimmerman and the "innocent" Trayvon Martin is particularly interesting.

    George Zimmerman, in fact, is so dark that wouldn't have looked out of place in any Mexican village and yet the media still chose to describe him as "white." This made this shooting simply another example of "white racism."

    The pictures of George Zimmerman that were taken immediately after the shooting are quite revealing . It took a long time for the first pictures of of the injuries inflicted on Zimmerman to finally come out in the MSM. The first ones that finally appeared showed him after having been treated and cleaned and stitched up by by medical personnel, either at the scene or at an emergency room afterwards.

    In these very sanitized photos we still see some still obvious serious injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head that showed that Martin had apparently been on top of Zimmerman and had been on top of Zimmerman while banging the back of his head into the pavement. No wonder Zimmerman was upset when he shot Trayvon.

    The lack of blood in these pictures however made Zimmerman's injuries appear less serious than they might have been. In fact this picture was finally probably but reluctantly distributed by the media specifically to downplay the actual extent of Zimmerman's injuries.The writer of this comment apparently feels that Zimmerman should have let Martin continue to bang his head on the ground to prove that he wasn't a racist.

    Then, another picture finally suddenly appeared after an even longer delay. It was not distributed by the MSM however, I personally discovered it during an internet search.It showed Zimmerman's head right after the attack and before treatment. The back of his head was absolutely covered in a huge amount of blood, maybe as much as a half or full pint When I first saw it I was reminded me of one of the more gruesome wound you see in war movies.. Trayvon had in fact apparently been beating the hell out of the weak and puggy Zimmerman. Very few people have ever been shown this far bloodier picture since it never appeared in the MSM.. The MSM had totally censored it. This bloody picture was undoubtedly a major factor in Zimmerman being acquitted at his criminal trial.

    Then the question must be what exactly was Zimmerman doing out there in the first place bothering outstanding citizens like Trayvon? Was he walking around just to be mean to black folks?

    Actually , he was a member of a "neighborhood watch" group that was attempting to counter a staggering rise in the number of black on white crimes that were occurring with increasingly frequency against the non black members of the Ferguson community. I seem to remember that there had been over 2400 property crimes and physical attacks in recent times committed n this middle class, racially mixed neighborhood. by the members of the nearby ghetto. I remember reading that some white residents reported having been burglarized five (or more) times over a fairly short period of time . Zimmerman was patrolling simply because of this increasing crime wave was making living in Ferguson for whites simply untenable. The white folks were desperate. Hence the citizen patrols.

    But it was already simply too late, It was increasingly futile and dangerous for him to even be making his patrol rounds and the MSM has now made this futility complete. Now Ferguson has become yet another failed black majority community, sor of like a mini east Oakland. The whites have now apparently disappeared but only after having sold their houses at firesale prices.
    , @gwynedd1
    That's some solid speculation you have there. And yes , its an oxymoron.

    Zimmerman may have escalated it at a particular stage , but Martin escalated it from that point based on the evidence. So unless Zimmerman is a master manipulator, even faking his own injuries , you'd have to be pretty tool worthy not to see the escalation continues until Martian got more than he could handle.

    Even so we don't really know, and that's the problem. What we do know however is the media used old baby pictures to create a narrative that a 12 year old child was looking for candy as a substitute for a near adult adolescent, 17 year old looking to make a drug cocktail.
    , @Colleen Pater
    youre wrong trayvon was sent to his dads because he had one assaulted a bus driver, two been caught with stolen jewelry and burglar tools in his school locker, three assaulted another student four been all over social media posing with drugs and guns gang signs and messaging about how to buy pills and make the drug lean/drizz etc, his autopsy showed extensive liver damage do to lean use, he was in fact that night buying the ingrediants to make lean and to use marijuanna. so basically zimmermans instincts were spot on trayvon was a violent drug addict casing the hood to more burglaries he may have even been responsible for some that had been going on. zimmerman was a licenced firearm carrier, neighborhood watch. he called 911 and stayed back trayvon spotted him and confronted him and attacked him and tried to kill him. the baby pictures of trayvon are agitprop. the reality i outlined is well documented but completely suppressed.
    , @Fred Reed
    Actually a great deal is known about the Trayvon affair, but most know only what appeared in the media. Worth a read isl If I Had a Son

    https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=if+i+had+a+son

    I don-t think many people are aware of the level of distortion that occurred in the MSM
    , @ben tillman

    I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman.
     
    That's true if by "nothing" you mean "everything".
    , @seeker searcher
    Nothing suggests Trayvon Martin was in the wrong you say? Only the fact the jury found Zimmerman acted in self defense when he shot Trayvon. Nor was he told not to follow Trayvon, but instead a non police 911 operator told him you don't have to do that at which point he responded in the affirmative and was in the process of returning to his car when assaulted. More interesting than the Klans history, during which 1 out 3 of their victims were white, is that neither the ADL or the SPLC estimate their current membership in excess of 6000, which means liberals invest a lot of ink on a group with virtually zero political clout. As to whether Till sexually assaulted the shooters wife, it is of course gospel among liberals that whether a sexual assault occurs or not is in the eye of the victim, unless of course the perp is black and the victim white.
    , @anon
    Zimmerman didn't follow Trayvon after the dispatcher said he didn't need him to. If you actually listen to the recording of the call, after the dispatcher says "We don't need you to do that.", Zimmerman stays on the line for ninety seconds giving his information.

    Ninety seconds would have been plenty of time for Trayvon to walk the distance from where Zimmerman's car was parked to the house. If Zimmerman had continued following him, he would have caught up to him before he even hung up the phone.

    But in reality, it's even worse than that. Trayvon's body was only about one hundred feet from Zimmerman's car. So unless he was walking at the speed of around one foot per second, he couldn't have been walking toward the house. And, again, unless Zimmerman was following him at that ridiculously slow speed, he would have caught him before he was even off the phone.

    Of course, Trayvon didn't HAVE to walk home. What's more likely is that he either went someplace near where his body was found and waited for Zimmerman to come back (which would be "lying in wait"), or he went somewhere else and then came back towards Zimmerman's car.

    We'll almost certainly never know which he did, but the fact is, Zimmerman wasn't "following" him at that point, because it's simply impossible to follow someone who is either not moving, or is moving toward you.
    , @No_0ne
    Still trying to justify Martin's unprovoked attack on Zimmerman? Pitiful.
    , @Axeman
    With the documentation of the dispatch call so available to the public, it's amazing how many people repeat the same errant time line. First of all, the 911 operator never told Zimmerman not to follow Martin, he was told "we don't need you to do that". Besides that we don't live in a country where 911 dispatchers can order us to do anything, those words came after they detected that Zimmerman was walking at a brisk pace, or running, from the wind whistling by his phone mic. This prompted the dispatcher to ask "are you following him?" To which Zimmerman replied "Yeah", and then was told "We don't need you to do that".

    Still, Zimmerman has always maintained that at that point he walked back to his truck, and we stop hearing the wind whistling over the phone, meaning whether or not he did, although he felt he was losing Martin to begin with, he still slackened his pace for the remainder of the call, if he pursued Martin at all after that. And while the police are arranging to meet with him at his truck, he cuts off giving his home address and says "I don't know where the kid is". That wrapup takes ~60 seconds. Roughly a minute that ends up with Zimmerman saying he doesn't know where the kid is. So he slackened his pace and lost the kid, after saying "OK" when told "we don't need you to do that".

    However, the timeline and analysis of the layout seem to support this case, better than those that "just know" that he continued to follow Martin. Star witness Jeantel testified Martin's father expectation that he would be closer to the house than he ended up. Likely indicating events that match Zimmerman's recounting of being ambushed on the way back to his truck, rather than catching up with Martin.

    However, given that all this has tape and official testimony to back up, the number of times I have heard "he was ordered not to leave his truck" is staggering. The wind whistles and he pants "f---ing cold" markedly before , the dispatcher says anything that can dimly be characterized as an "order" (per that standard narrative, that seems to situationally prefer a police state, and vigilante death for those who violate police state rule). And that's after the dispatcher questions "are you running" and Zimmerman answers "yes".

    In fact the curious state of the pro-Martin side seems to indicate both passing support for a civilian subjection to police order, and at the same time the dispensation of vigilante justice deserving somebody who "disobeys" police order. Meanwhile, the movement that has taken the symbol of Martin as a whole seems to argue, at least in part for a summary distrust of police, to the extent of disbanding the police entirely.

    Thus, containing elements of both that the police were entirely within their prerogative to restrain the right of a citizen to pursue his interests in the way he thinks, and a total distrust of the honesty and integrity of the policing structure as some arbitrary, and expendable authority. In fact, a proper combination of the two narratives would have us believe that the cops didn't need Zimmerman to follow Martin, because they would kill that n----- when they got there. That would hardly present a case for Zimmerman not to leave his truck and comply, especially given that Zimmerman might have been more likely to witness the cops shooting Martin (we don't need you to be a witness to what we will do), and Zimmerman had a record for accosting a police officer for a mistreatment of a black man.

    In fact, it's even suggested that one of the reasons that young black males have more run ins with cops is because the reserve the right not to comply with a police officer
    , @Adar.
    At that exact moment Treyvons socked Zimmerman, breaking the nose of George, jumped on top of George, then continued beat him for up to a minute without allowing George to rise to his feet, including slamming the head of George into the concrete several times, Treyvons became the aggressor and demonstrated a determined intent to KILL.
    , @DrD
    "Nothing suggests Trayvon was wrong "?!
    I refer you to Jack Cashill's book "If I Had a Son", and to Masaad Ayoob's series of online essays on the matter. Educate yourself.
    , @Calion
    Agreed. Yes, it turns out that Michael Brown was a bad poster child for BLM, and the Treyvon Martin case was probably decided correctly, but neither of those facts negates the reality that there definitely seems to be a different standard of justice applied to blacks, especially urban blacks, than to other people. And Eric Garner, another catalyst of BLM, isn't mentioned at all. The institutional injustices turned up in the investigation of the Ferguson police department and court system are by themselves indications of the need for such a movement, even if many of the specific practices and demands of BLM are not warranted.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are only available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also only be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-kkk-and-mass-racial-killings/#comment-1576601
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. During ww2, some klansman-like lewis button-even collaborated with the government against opponents of the war http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/p/jpj1/hoods.htm They were joined by rabidly anti-catholic socialists- like warmongerer kenneth leslie, whose rhetoric about germany resembles hannity’s about iran

  3. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    The white iSteve crowd here will probably take from this article “Why is the white man always being targeted etc etc.”

    But those whites, and apparently not Unz himself, care to dig deeper and find out why this is the case. What group would benefit from this arrangement?

    Why keep antogonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people? Just look at who actually started the KKK. It was a Jew who started it to trap all those angry white iSteve types into hating blacks and to serve their role in creating a boogeyman the elites could use.

    • Replies: @deplorable frog
    Your basic position is the discredited libertarian nonsense

    here the leftists are correct: your colorblindness, your desire to "be the world" and sing kumbaya, against those amorphous "elites" is an example of white privilege.
    , @Anonymous
    Got a source for that allegation?

    Fascinating article in any case.
    , @Erik Sieven
    what an unworthy comment under a great article
    , @westernerer
    By your logic, black thuggery is to be excused because ultimately some Jew "antagonized" them into doing it? And likewise, all it takes for White americans to work against their self-interest is a cunning Jew?
    That's precisely the sort of dumb reasoning that cripples nationalism. I have vastly more in common with Mr Unz (a jew) than globalists like the Clintons (whites). In fact, there's nothing more useful than a Jew with proper ideals - because unlike Whites they can't be disregarded by liberals and their far-fetched Holocaust-associations.
    Thanks for the article and a great website.
    , @imbroglio
    I thought the Klan was founded on Christmas Eve, 1865, in Tennessee, by Gen. Bedford Forrest and a few ex-Confederate soldiers.

    Who was the Jew?
    , @Wizard of Oz
    This seems quite inconsiztent with the media suppression that Ron notes.
  4. and yet Obama hands off the internet to international institutions, out from under the protective cover of that meddlesome first amendment

  5. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    its true that Zimmerman should have “backed down”, but there was no reason for Martin to assault him. If someone follows you from a distance, you don’t turn around and deliberately confront them, and then attack them

    that kind of terrible judgement, and the subsequent details of Martin’s life revealed through the fiasco showed that Martin really was a low-life thug and a criminal waiting to happen, and that Zimmerman’s instincts about Martin being trouble were correct from the beginning.

    • Replies: @boogerbently
    You are a victim of the aforementioned media brainwashing.
    It took weeks for the true story to be released. By then, everyone had been told the lie and for weeks seen the pic of the 12 year old Trayvonn.
    In fact, I bet when you hear the name (Trayvonn) this is the image you see in your head,
    NOT the gold toothed, tattooed, gangster photographed with his gun and loot from a robbery.
    , @ben tillman

    its true that Zimmerman should have “backed down”, but there was no reason for Martin to assault him.
     
    Zimmerman was not pursuing Trayvon when Trayvon attacked him. Z was going back to his car.
  6. @Anonymous
    The white iSteve crowd here will probably take from this article "Why is the white man always being targeted etc etc."

    But those whites, and apparently not Unz himself, care to dig deeper and find out why this is the case. What group would benefit from this arrangement?

    Why keep antogonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people? Just look at who actually started the KKK. It was a Jew who started it to trap all those angry white iSteve types into hating blacks and to serve their role in creating a boogeyman the elites could use.

    Your basic position is the discredited libertarian nonsense

    here the leftists are correct: your colorblindness, your desire to “be the world” and sing kumbaya, against those amorphous “elites” is an example of white privilege.

  7. Great article , Ron! The best I’ve read from you so far. Kudos!

    I don’t have time for a lengthy comment at the moment, but I’m going to reread this piece (to enjoy it again, and to make sure I didn’t accidentally miss anything) tomorrow and comment on the important points you brought to light.

    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith
    Again, Ron, damn good article!

    I'm a hunt-n-peck typist, so lemme get right to it.

    First things first. You wrote about the dishonesty of the MSM, and I couldn't agree with you more, but you failed to give anything more than a superficial treatment of what is, in reality, an incomprehensively massive problem. Volumes could be written about the depravity of the MSM, I know, I just feel like you could have used stronger language in your descriptions of them. But, let's move on...

    In order to effectively fight against something you have to "know thine enemy." So, in order to know this enemy, the MSM, we have to dig into the guts of these organizations and find out who the hell is calling the shots. So, let's do that. Let us start with the owners/chief operators of the various MSM corporations.

    Viacom: Chairman and CEO, Sumner Redstone. Sumner is Jewish.
    Comcast: Chairman and CEO, Brian L. Roberts. Brian is Jewish.
    The Walt Disney Company: Chairman and CEO, Robert A. Iger. Robert is Jewish.
    Time Warner: Chairman and CEO, Jeff Bewkes. Jeffrey is Jewish.
    News Corp: Chairman and CEO, Rupert Murdoch. Rupert is a Jew, by Jewish law.
    CBS: President and CEO, Leslie Moonves. Les is Jewish.

    These six corporations control more than 90% of the media in the US. The other 10% of the US media is also effectively controlled by the Jews through strategic infiltration into high level executive positions, and into all other levels (writers, producers, directors, editors, columnists, etc., etc.) of corporate operations.

    The Jews control the MSM. They're also vastly overrepresented in the Cultural Marxism/Social Justice movement, which is heavily propagandized to the American people through the MSM, numerous Jewish controlled NGO's, and, of course, the entire educational system.

    Let's move on.

    Check this out...

    http://clashdaily.com/2015/12/breaking-17-black-thugs-arrested-for-burning-white-girl-alive-the-msm-is-silent/

    It's hard to plumb the depths of human barbarity...every time I think I've heard, or seen, the worst example of man's inhumanity something new comes along to take it's place.

    In order to comprehend the true magnitude of black-on-white criminality (and where we're headed (Race/Civil War) if we fail to get control of the beast) we need to look for news aggregation websites that specialize in black-on-white crime. I've only found one to date...

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw

    There may be others, I don't know...if anyone knows of other sites like this one lemme know.
  8. “… By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor…”

    So if White people, or Mexicans or mixed race people, follow Blacks they should have their heads pounded into concrete?

    Good to know and certainly clarifies the differences between the races.

    • Replies: @josh
    Did he follow after he was told that he didn't "need to do that" (not ordered to stop btw)? If you listen to the 911 call on youtube, Zimmerman is running and breathing heavily, after he is told he doesn't need to follow, he stops running and breathing heavily and tell the 911 operator that he has lost visual contact with Martin. So at what point does Zimmerman follow Martin after being told to stop?
  9. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    Nah, fuck Trayon. He was in the neighborhood to steal, he didn’t live there. Like with the cop and Michael Brown, Zimmerman was an inconvenience to his prowling and he was enraged because: Black privilege to steal. And like Michael Brown, the criminal Travon assaulted someone he shouldn’t have and got what was coming to him like any thug. The jury let Zimmerman go. But the cops knew what they knew, they covered it, cowed by the press as they were. Furthermore, the Black-run Federal government, try as mightily as they possibly could to blame the cop, had to admit the truth, much too late as even they knew the truth immediately (never waste a good opportunity). They KNEW Michael Brown, from the start of the investigation, initiated the fight with the cop. But to allow plenty of time for #Blacklivesmatter and all that came from that, they withheld the truth. The Feds knew from the outset that “Hands up don’t shoot” was a fucking lie and they held out the truth for months.

    Spare us your platitudes about disagreeable material. Dragging out the benign WASPS is ridiculous. This is Black America at it’s finest and YOUR objections on the reportage is just more coverup. You are of the very same reprehensible element that would put the mothers of certified criminal psychopaths on the stage of the Democrat National Convention. These are the mothers of criminal Blacks justifiably killed in righteous police shootings by those commissioned to protect us. And these mothers are celebrated for the monsters THEY created that the arm of the law put down. Don’t turn reality upside down, Bob. This is 2016, not the KKK of the 40s-70s, who were all Democrats in any case.

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
    In much the same fashion the Klan actually devoted most of its efforts to paying a night time "spiritual adjustment" visit to some white trash guy who was pissing his money away on booze, card games and whores while his wife and children went barefoot and hungry, Bob Johnson is in desperate need of an unexpected nocturnal visit.
    , @Ace
    Thank you.
  10. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    A really well-paced, sequential argument.

    • Replies: @Ralph Raico
    That's what struck me also on this well-balanced, entirely rational piece by Ron. The Martin-Zimmerman case illustrates another of his points: the massive bias of the media, nationally and internationally (the Guardian). For quite a while, the photo of Martin that was spread about was of a smiling 12-year-old schoolboy. Only later were we able to see what a hulking thug he was when he confronted Zimmerman.
  11. Bob Johnson is totally clueless about the Zimmerman case. Zimmerman did nothing wrong. He was violently attacked by Martin and merely defended himself when (the 17 year-old, 6 foot tall “child”) Martin tried to kill him. That’s the reason the jury declared Zimmerman not guilty. Even the media’s lynch mob hysteria couldn’t overwhelm the clear facts of the case.

  12. The liberal media’s obsession with the KKK, to the point where is regarded with the same horror as the Waffen SS, is probably down to the scary visuals – the ghost-like masks, haunting chants and burning crosses. No doubt these were intended to scare black petty criminals and other targets of the KKK, but they probably ended up scaring everyone else as well.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    During the 1950s and '60s, the Klan was a very effective force in keeping Black wanna-be thugs and sorry while trash in line. As a result, violent crime directed at innocent Blacks or Whites was virtually unheard of, as well as child abuse and non-support of children. I know, because I grew to maturity in the Deep South in that era when one's neighborhood was the safest place anyone could be and where no one locked doors while sleeping or when leaving home for extended periods of time. So explain to me again what was so bad about the Klan and why we would not be extremely lucky to have it back in our neighborhoods today.
  13. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material.

    I’d have to second that. I have also found Ron’s articles to be consistently very worthwhile, but this one is really a very bad article. It made me cringe to read it. On the Trayvon Martin thing, I think a fair-minded assessment is that we simply don’t know what happened. There were two people who did know. One is dead and the other has every reason to be less than truthful.

    I think the worst aspect of the article is his treatment of this Zebra murders case. This recently came to my attention because Steve Sailer alluded to it. I had not heard of the case. I went and looked at the wikipedia page and did some googling and it immediately struck me that the official version of events must be a total fiction. I wrote a response to that here:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/gerald-early-on-muhammad-ali/#comment-1443598

    Sailer never deigned to respond to me. Ron writes here:

    According to the later court testimony, black participants each needed to kill a total of nine white men to be awarded the coveted title of “Death Angel,” earning them the right to have their photos displayed in the Black Muslim meeting halls, while roughly double points were awarded for slaughtering white women or children, on the grounds that such killings were more psychologically difficult.

    The above looks utterly preposterous to me. What really happened is something quite different, I assume. For starters, it looks impossible simply because all of these groups are (and were) completely infiltrated by agents of the State.

    But, in general, the idea that people went to a temple or mosque, a place of worship, and were recruited to kill random white people and then they were going to have their pictures put on the wall…. a person with a certain level of BDQ has to be skeptical of such a narrative, I think.

    Look, the business of the Nation of Islam having some weird theology where they say that white folks are collectively the devil or the spawn of the devil — that really has nothing to do with the notion that the NOI was actively encouraging their members to go kill random white people. The rank and file of NOI, as far as I can tell, are actually quite law abiding religious people. Even leaving aside the issue that all these groups were infiltrated and could not conduct a killing campaign over a period of half a year without the authorities knowing about it, the whole notion that, within the NOI, they are openly discussing killing random white people and everybody there is somehow okay with that — this is all preposterous, and that Ron Unz takes this at face value is rather cringeworthy.

    My reading of the situation is that the Zebra murders were a Deep State psyop since it is impossible for a group like NOI to just be plotting and carrying out these murders without the organs of the State knowing about it. Certainly not for half a year. Probably the people they did ultimately imprison were patsies of some sort and framed for it. If that is the case, and the real killers were never caught, that could well be because there was no intention of catching them. If this was a psyop, as I suspect, the reason is obvious. It gives them a pretext for a violent crackdown on this group that they don’t like. Okay, it doesn’t seem that such a crackdown followed, but they would have been setting up the narrative.

    All the above said, as in the Trayvon Martin case, I simply don’t know what really did happen. However, I see no sign that Ron Unz does either.

    • Replies: @westernerer
    Ahh, the Revusky school of reasoning: "I know nothing, but my intuition tells me I'm right"
    Like some contemporary shaman of the internet.
    , @Rurik
    OK JR,

    Since we're usually in agreement, I'll bounce my thoughts on this into the blogosphere..

    This is a brave and powerful article by Mr. Unz. It touches on a verboten subject and eviscerates and holds high the dripping entrails of the Orwellian mendacity enshrouding the length and breath of our entire society, from top to bottom. - That there is a knee-jerk hostility to Western (white) culture and people emanating out of all of our cultural institutions (and especially Hollywood) is so plainly obvious to anyone with eyes and ears that we all just take it for granted.

    That the rape and murder (and horrific treatment) of that teenage white girl wasn't reported in the news isn't going to raise eyebrows anywhere. We all know that's how it works. It's a one way street. If a black person is a victim, (or even if they aren't, as in the case of the Duke "rapists", or Travon, or Michael Brown, etcetera ad nauseam.. ) the media will shriek hysterically for days on end, until the whole world! (literally) knows about the Duke "rapists" or the numinous Travon, with his picture at 12 years old. Obama's son.

    But if it's a white victim, like the young people who died during the Wichita massacre, or Channon Christian and her boyfriend, then no one will have ever heard of them outside the local news.

    It goes like this with every crime and even historical events. Everything is filtered through the sieve of political correctness.

    Have you ever heard of the Holocaust JR? It seems to me there was a movie, or perhaps even two that were made about that event, yet there were over a hundred million victims of communism during the 20th century. Now, I can't remember the names of all those movies they made about the Holodomor (the genocide of white Christians by the millions by starvation). Didn't Steven Spielberg direct and Harvey Weinstein produce that big budget one?

    Have you ever heard about the black slavery that was once practiced in this country JR?

    I think they made a movie about it, if I'm not mistaken. But how many movies have they made about the genocidal treatment of innocent German civilians (who died by the millions after the second war was over). How many movies have they made about the monstrous and historical war crime of Dresden JR?

    Is it possible that our cultural institutions, and the media in particular- are in the hands of a people with a near monolithic contempt (hatred) for all things German? and consider their suffering and deaths by the millions to be of no consequence or concern? Just like the little white girl who is gang raped for days on end and then fed to alligators- when the sub-humans got done with her.

    Indeed, I suspect that right now, reading these words I'm typing, there is a very large percentage of people who're far more 0utraged at my characterization of these savage animals as "sub-humans" than they are at the incomprehensible suffering of that little girl, (and her loved ones). And that is all part of our carefully constructed programming. We're more sensitive to racial epitaphs than to a girl being fed to alligators.

    And all of that is to be expected. Because they don't do what they do for nothing JR. All of our memes and paradigms and narratives that make us all think and feel about events and the world around us are all part of our programming. None of us are born knowing the truth about the world and our place in it. We rely first on our parents and family to understand the world, and then on the media, the print and radio and television, (and only recently the Internet). So if the media, is (and I use the singular present tense verb 'is' deliberately) telling us that most all young, black teenage males are desperately trying to graduate and get their degrees so they can rise above all the racism that permeates our (irredeemably racist) society but then almost always while in their prime, and unarmed and walking around with their hands up and pleading not to get shot at least this one time- by yet another racist white [redundant] man with a gun, (often but not always with a badge too)- then this meme will take hold. It's guaranteed to, and that of course is the point.

    Now just for the record, there are racist white (and black and brown, etc..) men. And there are criminals and thugs and even murderers with guns and badges. But from what I've glimmered, most of America's cops, while being far too arrogant and thuggish, are nominally professionals. And if you, the reader, had to pick between your family's health and well being at the at the mercy of your typical urban young black men in America vs. the police, well then I can tell you that I know the streets, and I know Detroit and Miami, and there are places that they'd cut you to pieces as much as look at you. We get a very skewed version of reality from our msm, than exists in the real world, let me tell ya.

    And what follows is the obvious question why?

    Anyone with two peanuts rolling around in their noggins knows that Jews overwhelmingly own and control our msm. Duh. So the question becomes why do they treat white Americans with such overt hostility? Why are we (especially white, straight, southern, Christian men) always depicted as evil or pathetic- always deplorable? And irredeemable?

    (Perhaps not always, of course. But that is the meme. And we all know it).

    Is this hostility cultural, religious, or something more intractable?

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men - as congenital, if latent Nazis? Is that why they relentlessly foist non-white immigration on all white nations? Are they trying to protect themselves from a future potential holocaust by eliminating the threat in advance? What are the chances they might be creating the threat where none exists- with their 'cure'?

    Anyways, sorry for ruminating here on larger philosophical ramblings, but this article for me brings up important and extremely relevant questions.
    , @dahoit
    Zimmerman was half Jewish right?
    He certainly doesn't strike me as having any righteous character,and with all the subsequent crap he's done, I wouldn't believe him an iota.
    , @Jus' Sayin'...
    I'm going to have to respond here because this comment illustrates only too well exactly the points that Mr. Unz is trying to make.

    First on Trayvon Williams: A lot of facts came out during the trial that NPR and other MSM outlets have chosen to ignore and bury: (1) Williams was obviously casing his new neighborhood for burglary opportunities when accosted by Zimmerman. On a rainy night he had been wandering for over 45 minutes through his new neighborhood when his path crossed Zimmerman's. A ten minute walk would have got him back to his house where his cousin was waiting for him. (2) Testimony of Williams's Haitian girlfriend established that Williams attacked Zimmerman based on the false belief that Zimmerman was a homosexual looking to hire Williams for a sexual tryst. (3) THe respected forensic pathologist, Vincent DeMaio, testified that ballistic and other evidence conclusivelt proved every aspect of Zimmerman's testimony; that Zimmerman was attacked by Williams; that Williams was sitting atop Zimmerman , leaning over him, and beating his head into the ground; that Zimmerman fired up into Williams at extremely close range in a last ditch effort to save his life.

    Second on the Zebra case: Mr. Unz left out a lot of the most damning information presented in the book he cites. The FBI was involved in the case early on. They actually established a connection between the murders and a prominent, and politically connected, member of the Nation of Islam based in Chicago. FBI agents, promised that the author would not reveal their names nor that of the Chicago suspects, told the author that a decision was made in Washington not to further pursue the case because of the racial tensions it might arouse. These agents were convinced that a large number of other Negro murderers could have been brought to justice, including some very high ranking members of the Nation of Islam cult had these leads been pursued.
    , @Ace
    Your idea that this was a Deep State psyop is bizarre, assuming as it does an objective that necessarily involved the murder of 270 whites. That is some sick thinking and when, pray tell, did that "crackdown" on the NOI occur?

    You seem to think that there had to be a sign up sheet in the mosques of these loveable people with no virulent hatred of whites at all. That the NOI just wasn't implicated. In point of fact, Farrakhan rushed to provide legal representation to four of the NOI men charged. The one he wouldn't provide representation for was a fifth guy who turned state's evidence.

    One can argue that Farrakhan only provided a defense because his peeps would see him as not standing by the brothers. The fact that Farrakhan preaches unrelenting hatred of whites is, however, consistent with the methods and goals of the Zebra killers. Seeing his defense of the men prosecuted as only an after-the-fact exercise in PR just isn't credible. Many NOI people were involved. The likelihood that it was a local effort by psychopaths is slim.
    , @john7
    Keep drinkin the kool aid... the 'nation of islam' quite respectable law abiding etc'?!?!?! when their leaders openly call for a race war against whites? [and WHY havent THEY been charged with hate crimes?]
    saint trayvon got exactly what he deserved, as did brown. Period.
    The KKK as the original group was started, was solely there to protect white people - women in particular - from criminals of every colour - they lynched several whites -due to the governments lax treatment of same. The FACT that the blacks make up a disproportionate percentage of criminals is simply played out. The occupying government - still in place - was and is giving blacks a pass and actually encouraging their behaviour. Back when men were still men, some fellows decided to do something about it. Were the KKK still active in its original form [the current group is a government sponsored front] then we wouldnt have problems like Charlotte, Baltimore, Ferguson etc. Nor would we have nation of islam.
    The smearing of the Klan, as the author points out, is just more anti-white sensationalism designed to bolster the narrative.
  14. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @Anonymous
    The white iSteve crowd here will probably take from this article "Why is the white man always being targeted etc etc."

    But those whites, and apparently not Unz himself, care to dig deeper and find out why this is the case. What group would benefit from this arrangement?

    Why keep antogonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people? Just look at who actually started the KKK. It was a Jew who started it to trap all those angry white iSteve types into hating blacks and to serve their role in creating a boogeyman the elites could use.

    Got a source for that allegation?

    Fascinating article in any case.

  15. Ron,

    Thanks for bringing light on this important story from the past.

    The Zebra Killers made headlines in the SF Chronicle during the time that I was separated from my wife and young daughter (2 years old). They were living in the City while I was located in Fresno for a couple of years, and, believe me, I became very concerned and upset as San Francisco seemed enveloped by a spate of murders commited by blacks against whites there.

    I had no idea that similar was happening in other parts of the state, and was incredibly relieved when the Chron announced that the killers had been caught. I don’t know why more of these killings weren’t brought to light then, and more of the killers were not pursued. It is of concern to me that this was not done. Thanks for pointing to the book: I will check it out.

    I was back living in San Francisco during most of the Zodiac killings, and would, through the years after they stopped, periodically read an article (again) in the Chronicle speculating on possible suspects (I think the prime one was a guy who had suffered a serious head injuly in a car accident that the detectives still on the case may have provoked homocidal tendencies, yet the “suspect” had died before they could take it any further).

    So, I can tell you that both of these cases received a lot of press and attention at the time they were ongoing. But you are right to point out that only the Zodiac case was made into a feature film and had many books written about it, while the much more terrorizing (with higher body count) Zebra killings case has fallen into the memory hole.

    I’ve lived long enough and in enough large American cities to be acutely aware of black crime and violent behavior, but I must say I haven’t taken the time to frame it in a way to really think about it until just the past few years.

    It’s an issue, an important issue, something that should be on the tip of everyone’s tongues, black and white, and yet people, including myself in times past, have turned away from it. It’s not just the press. And it’s not just white guilt or liberal tolerance either. I don’t understand it, either, but I hope that it becomes more prominent in the public square from now on.

    How can we deal with a social problem if we ignore it and don’t talk about it honestly and bluntly?

  16. So under this particular victimological standard, the 15 victims of the KKK over the two decades from 1950 more reasonably justify the massive attention they have received.

    A rather tightly restricted usage of “reasonably justify”, I think.

    A pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long

    This better covers the aberrant victimological standard to which you referred earlier. It is pretty clear that there are reasons for this remarkably consistent pattern of exaggerating white on black crime and suppressing news of black on white, and even black on black, crime. It’s not an accident that powerful groups in the societies of the US sphere have adopted this practice and either co-opted or coerced the media wholesale into the ongoing manipulation of politics and society.

    On a whole range of issues, certainly including racial ones, the American media may be fast approaching the point of possessing negative credibility, with increasing numbers of people tending to assume that the facts may be exactly opposite to what the media claims.

    But this only applies, so far at least, to a cynical, sharper minority and to those (many of them in the powerless underclass) who have really felt the sharp edge of reality, having been in the wrong place at the wrong time or been unable to escape it (in the case of the aforementioned underclass). I fear there will be a lot of too nice, mostly middle and working class children who will fall badly foul of the harsh reality that their schools and news and opinion sources will not have prepared them for.

    Those who have allowed the currency of journalistic integrity to become totally debased have only themselves to blame when they discover it is no longer accepted by the general public.

    I get the impression it’s a long time since there was even any pretence in journalistic circles of trying (even if the result is inevitably ultimately imperfect by definition) to present unbiased information, rather than a “narrative” based upon the journalist’s understanding of underlying rights and wrongs.

    Another fascinating piece, overall, thanks.

    • Replies: @Private school mom
    "I fear there will be a lot of too nice, mostly middle and working class children who will fall badly foul of the harsh reality that their schools and news and opinion sources will not have prepared them for"
    Look up poor 17 yr old Lily Burk, whose insulated upbringing coupled with SJW parents led to her being murdered by a black ex-con whom she was trying to help. Cameras show her at 2 ATMs getting cash for him and riding in the passenger seat while he drove her car. She even called her parents for advice on how to get cash with her credit card while she was with this guy. I'm sure she had the opportunity to escape or ask for help at one of the public ATMs, but I doubt she even realized she was in danger at that point. After all, I'm sure she was taught that poor black people just need a helping hand.
  17. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    I agree. Many if not most adolescent males in urban or suburban areas have had the unpleasant experiance of being stalked by a “chickenhawk.” Happened to me and my friends in the 1970s, This started when we were 12-13 years old, we had to run. It must be ten times worse now with gay liberation and discrimination laws.

    To Trayvon, Zimmerman probably looked like a creep stalker like Jeff Dahmer following him down an alley.

    Spoiled a good article.

    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...

    ...Many if not most adolescent males in urban or suburban areas have had the unpleasant experiance of being stalked by a “chickenhawk.”...
     
    Congratulations! You just made the Zimmerman defense case air tight, as did Williams's stupid, tub-of-lard, Haitian girlfriend during her trial testimony. You and she provided the reasoning that provoked Williams to attack Zimmerman. And once Zimmerman was attacked he had a perfect right - as do we all - to defend himself.
    , @ben tillman

    I agree. Many if not most adolescent males in urban or suburban areas have had the unpleasant experiance of being stalked by a “chickenhawk.” Happened to me and my friends in the 1970s, This started when we were 12-13 years old, we had to run. It must be ten times worse now with gay liberation and discrimination laws.

    To Trayvon, Zimmerman probably looked like a creep stalker like Jeff Dahmer following him down an alley.
     
    The problem with this defense is that the stalking had ended. Zimmerman lost Trayvon (who had made it to the place he was staying) and was heading back to his car when Trayvon leapt from the bushes to attack him.
  18. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor.

    The honest truth is that nobody knows exactly how the confrontation developed, so the only way to reach a conclusion such as yours is to make extensive assumptions and to disbelieve Zimmerman’s own account.

    Personally, given the general nature of Martin (which was, as Unz suggests, a violent, personally aggressive and physically confident young thug), Zimmerman’s account of how the actual fight began is perfectly plausible. That kind of “”who you looking at?” confrontation followed by physical aggression is commonplace amongst young thugs, and especially black ones, as anyone who’s ever been young ought to have learned from experience.

    But you are incorrect in your rather self-serving assertion that a physical confrontation of a suspected follower is the “reasonable” response. The reasonable response from somebody normal who wants to avoid unnecessary violence, if followed by a stranger at night, is either to avoid confrontation or to confront in a manner that avoids violence. As far as we know, Zimmerman had lost track of Martin before he was attacked. There was nothing we know of that would have prevented Martin from just going home safely, if he had chosen that course of action.

    As I pointed out, we have no direct knowledge of how the confrontation developed except Zimmerman’s own evidence. But the overall circumstances, of Zimmerman being a concerned, basically defensive neighbourhood watch type in his own area, and the more mature of the two, and Martin being an aggressive young thug, should give the benefit of the doubt to Zimmerman every time unless there is strong evidence to doubt it.

    Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    Unz’s point is clearly that it would not be at all surprising if he had, and that the pattern of US media deception means that the lack of reporting of such actions cannot be regarded as evidence to suggest that it didn’t happen.

    The standard here is not that of a trial, but rather the historical one of balance of possibilities.

  19. Phenomenal article, Ron. You’re a sovereign asset. The UnzReview is the best thing going in journalism–though that’s not as complimentary as I mean it to be!

    One quibble:

    I found these statements to be in some tension:

    1. “Meanwhile, the last time the KKK held any significant political power was almost 100 years ago, during its Midwestern heyday of the 1920s.”

    and

    2. “…the combined decades of the 1950s and 1960s, which represented the height of the Klan’s modern power.”

    Perhaps you meant something that didn’t quite come through here.

    Thanks for all your hard work!

  20. @Anonymous
    The white iSteve crowd here will probably take from this article "Why is the white man always being targeted etc etc."

    But those whites, and apparently not Unz himself, care to dig deeper and find out why this is the case. What group would benefit from this arrangement?

    Why keep antogonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people? Just look at who actually started the KKK. It was a Jew who started it to trap all those angry white iSteve types into hating blacks and to serve their role in creating a boogeyman the elites could use.

    what an unworthy comment under a great article

  21. Only 3 movies about Emmett Till? Hollywood is so anti-Black because 3 is not enough. Even Jesus Christ had more than 3 films made about him and Jesus was nowhere near Emmett’s league.

  22. I’ll read it tomorrow Ron, great picture…some of my Indiana kin were members!

    If you know the photo of the lynching in Marion in the ’3o’s… I think I can pick out my Great Grandad and Great uncle in the crowd there. Not too sure, they were Cumberland Gappers, Williamsburg English…some Jews too supposedley. Up through the Cumberland Gap, stopped over in Kentucky/ Tennessee/ Virginia… that’s the folks that populated the rest of the Midwest.

  23. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    The case of “white” George Zimmerman and the “innocent” Trayvon Martin is particularly interesting.

    George Zimmerman, in fact, is so dark that wouldn’t have looked out of place in any Mexican village and yet the media still chose to describe him as “white.” This made this shooting simply another example of “white racism.”

    The pictures of George Zimmerman that were taken immediately after the shooting are quite revealing . It took a long time for the first pictures of of the injuries inflicted on Zimmerman to finally come out in the MSM. The first ones that finally appeared showed him after having been treated and cleaned and stitched up by by medical personnel, either at the scene or at an emergency room afterwards.

    In these very sanitized photos we still see some still obvious serious injuries to the back of Zimmerman’s head that showed that Martin had apparently been on top of Zimmerman and had been on top of Zimmerman while banging the back of his head into the pavement. No wonder Zimmerman was upset when he shot Trayvon.

    The lack of blood in these pictures however made Zimmerman’s injuries appear less serious than they might have been. In fact this picture was finally probably but reluctantly distributed by the media specifically to downplay the actual extent of Zimmerman’s injuries.The writer of this comment apparently feels that Zimmerman should have let Martin continue to bang his head on the ground to prove that he wasn’t a racist.

    Then, another picture finally suddenly appeared after an even longer delay. It was not distributed by the MSM however, I personally discovered it during an internet search.It showed Zimmerman’s head right after the attack and before treatment. The back of his head was absolutely covered in a huge amount of blood, maybe as much as a half or full pint When I first saw it I was reminded me of one of the more gruesome wound you see in war movies.. Trayvon had in fact apparently been beating the hell out of the weak and puggy Zimmerman. Very few people have ever been shown this far bloodier picture since it never appeared in the MSM.. The MSM had totally censored it. This bloody picture was undoubtedly a major factor in Zimmerman being acquitted at his criminal trial.

    Then the question must be what exactly was Zimmerman doing out there in the first place bothering outstanding citizens like Trayvon? Was he walking around just to be mean to black folks?

    Actually , he was a member of a “neighborhood watch” group that was attempting to counter a staggering rise in the number of black on white crimes that were occurring with increasingly frequency against the non black members of the Ferguson community. I seem to remember that there had been over 2400 property crimes and physical attacks in recent times committed n this middle class, racially mixed neighborhood. by the members of the nearby ghetto. I remember reading that some white residents reported having been burglarized five (or more) times over a fairly short period of time . Zimmerman was patrolling simply because of this increasing crime wave was making living in Ferguson for whites simply untenable. The white folks were desperate. Hence the citizen patrols.

    But it was already simply too late, It was increasingly futile and dangerous for him to even be making his patrol rounds and the MSM has now made this futility complete. Now Ferguson has become yet another failed black majority community, sor of like a mini east Oakland. The whites have now apparently disappeared but only after having sold their houses at firesale prices.

    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    Then the question must be what exactly was Zimmerman doing out there in the first place bothering outstanding citizens like Trayvon? Was he walking around just to be mean to black folks?

    Actually , he was a member of a “neighborhood watch” group that was attempting to counter a staggering rise in the number of black on white crimes that were occurring with increasingly frequency against the non black members of the Ferguson community. I seem to remember that there had been over 2400 property crimes and physical attacks in recent times committed n this middle class, racially mixed neighborhood. by the members of the nearby ghetto. I remember reading that some white residents reported having been burglarized five (or more) times over a fairly short period of time . Zimmerman was patrolling simply because of this increasing crime wave was making living in Ferguson for whites simply untenable. The white folks were desperate. Hence the citizen patrols.
     
    Ferguson??? Zimmerman and Trayvon were in Sanford, Florida.
    , @Gandydancer
    silly billy says: "Zimmerman was patrolling...."

    Actually, no. Zimmerman was on his way to the store when he saw Martin coming into the gated community from the direction of a hole in the fence.

    And, oh, btw: Unz writes, "...Michael Brown of Ferguson fame was a gigantic, thuggish criminal, who casually committed the strong-arm robbery of a convenience store at night..."

    Actually, the robbery was just before noon. Brown's death was shortly after noon. And I'm unaware that Brown had a criminal record. He did, however, seem to be suffering from some mental problems. Google "Satan chasing angels" in connection with his name to find the NYT article with the relevant illuminating material.

    And, while I'm offering random corrections, unpc downunder wrote "the KKK... is regarded with the same horror as the Waffen SS..." Well, horror at "Waffen SS" is also a bit misplaced. If you were a member of Hitler's bodyguard, "Liebstandart Adolf Hitler", in, say, 1936 you had to be a committed Nazi and proven Aryan. If you were a member of SS Panzerkorps "Liebstandart Adolf Hitler" in, say, 1944, it might indicate nothing more than that the SS had used its pull to draft you before the Army had the opportunity to do so. Gestapo and concentration camp guards, e.g., were SS but not Waffen SS, and the distinction is somewhat important but often ignored.
  24. Once again, Ron Unz lets the facts speak for themselves, as he did years ago with his study indicating that violent crime rates by Mexicans in the US would be similar to rates by white Americans if age demographics were factored in. (Mexicans having a higher proportion of young men, a category more prone to crime than other age groups.)

    “Progressives” nevertheless will tend to object to this article’s conclusions as much if not more vehemently than many conservatives did to the counter-intuitive conclusions about Mexican crime rates. They will be inclined to dismiss it as an apology for the KKK. Facts can interfere with a social need for acceptance in the community of the “enlightened.” One cheap entry into that community is through ostentatious disassociation with one’s own ethnic or cultural roots, even when the sins of the latter are entirely blown out of proportion and the achievements underplayed.

    I’ve frequently quoted diplomat/historian George F. Kennan’s observation about the “self-flagellating conscience of the west.” It comes across as less populist than the current “ethno-masochism” explanation for the mea culpa compulsion among Europeans and Americans of European heritage. But it describes a rather peculiar western phenomenon that social psychologists should and might pay more attention to – if their own academic discipline itself were not so ideologically burdened by the phenomenon.

    As Ron Unz points out, the field of journalism has been similarly corrupted. The internet is a bit like the cliché of the old Wild West with many shooting from the hip. But it does indeed offer a ray of hope that more honest journalism uninhibited by the pressures of political correctness will increasingly make its mark.

  25. I just read this related piece about memory-holed racially motivated violence in the New Yorker:

    http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/09/19/a-buried-coup-detat-in-the-united-states?mbid=social_twitter

    One more thing:

    I object to your characterization of the Emmett Till murder. Though his father’s criminality is indeed ironic, I don’t think it has much bearing on the matter at hand. It would, for instance, be immediately be ruled as inadmissible and prejudicial in court. And rightly so. (And, yes, I do believe blacks are genetically more prone to criminality!)

    Emmett Till’s cousins were with him, if memory serves. It doesn’t seem at all likely that this white woman was raped or even assaulted in such a grave way that would have extenuated the brutal manner in which that boy was murdered.

    • Replies: @Erik Sieven
    the judiciary system is something different from journalism, social science or history. In court there are very high thresholds to sentence somebody, and it is good that this thresholds exist. Yet truth is more than what is legally true. What everybody is interested is interested in is the bigger picture, the general patterns.
    Those people who have made a legend out of Emmet Till for decades know this aswell, as they want to draw the well-known bigger picture of a little bit more than equal, a little bit more human, healthy and good black people vs wicked white people. It is not necessary to legally "prove" that Till actually raped the alleged victim, it is enough to show that once again a seemingly simple case could be something else than most people believe.
    Simple probabilistic thinking then leads to to conclusion that when those high-profile model-cases might show a picture of black violence with non-zero likelihood, than the general picture might even more so lean in this direction.
    , @Sean
    The lady in question was 5 ft tall with large breasts, which Till had been talking about in crude terms with his cousins outside after they had been in earlier. He towered over her. She told an FBI agent that she'd thought Till was an adult male, not a boy. Till had come back in and went behind the counter, blocked her way grabbed her wrist and held her around the waist and simulated sex. His cousins, who had dared him to go back in and prove his boasts on what he got up to with white girls in Chicago were not present during the incident, but an old black came out quickly and told them "You've got a crazy cousin".

    The woman then went to her car, which the boys correctly suspected was her going to retreive a gun. Till and his cousins were advised to leave immediately, but he leaned out the car and loudly called her baby. She tried to keep it a secret, but lots of people had heard the shout of Till.

    Till's behaviour towards a married woman would have been risking a severe beating in any black area. He looked like a man, and acted like a jackass. He was also too tough for his own good because the husband and brother of the woman had been told of the incident by local blacks a few day later (almost uniformly they disliked the arrogant Till). He was in line for a severe beating, what the men agreed on would be a fitting punishment but they couldn't breack him and he refused to apologise or even admit he was in the wrong, and that failure to be contrite when it was called for is what got him killed.

    , @Chrisnonymous
    It seems entirely possible to me that in a town where everybody knows everybody, the people who knew Till's father's penchants for violence and rape saw Till's behavior and decided to nip that criminal in the bud. I can't agree with that Minority Report style justice, but it does seem like some Old Testament behavior--in the order of Melchizidek, so to speak.
    , @Mark
    I was born less than 10 miles from where Emmett Till tried to swim the Tallahatchie river with the gin fan he stole. Poor little negro, that fan was just too heavy.
  26. “… the near-absolute media blackout has been quite remarkably Orwellian and deeply disturbing.”

    Not really … this is how the ruling class hope to keep the lid on a pot that always seems close to boiling over. In the old days, letting it boil over would have led to ethnic cleansing or even genocide, but if you delay and pray long enough while you re-balance the ethnic makeup of he nation, then you merely get civil war. The again, look at the ethnic cleansing going on in SoCal; seems there isn’t as much solidarity among the oppressed classes as the elite might have hoped to achieve.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Are you suggesting that there is much tacit support (as well as some open suport that I have heard) for offsetting black numbers with Latino, and also, perhaps that the MSM has been scared of stirring up more blacks to join in the racial violence against whites?
  27. “Silent Majority” whites: the sleeping giant that seems to be doing a Rip Van Winkle.

    Thanks for the “Zebra” tip. I’d never heard of the case, but now have the book.

    The KKK: seventy million?! That would have been a bit less than half the entire US population in 1955! Surely this can’t be correct? I’ve always imagined them as a fringe group of men in silly costumes, but now I have another topic to investigate, although not with Wikipedia, given its also not-always-objective portrayal of topics.

    “Communism never came to America in serious form”. Not as an openly declared organization, no. The CPUSA was outlawed as a political party in the early 50s if memory serves, but cultural Marxism was and still is very much present, particularly in the media and educational establishments. Mr. Unz deserves kudos for his work in exposing the extent of it.

    • Replies: @unadorned
    You seem confused. The 70 millions was the number killed by communism.
  28. @Anonymous
    The white iSteve crowd here will probably take from this article "Why is the white man always being targeted etc etc."

    But those whites, and apparently not Unz himself, care to dig deeper and find out why this is the case. What group would benefit from this arrangement?

    Why keep antogonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people? Just look at who actually started the KKK. It was a Jew who started it to trap all those angry white iSteve types into hating blacks and to serve their role in creating a boogeyman the elites could use.

    By your logic, black thuggery is to be excused because ultimately some Jew “antagonized” them into doing it? And likewise, all it takes for White americans to work against their self-interest is a cunning Jew?
    That’s precisely the sort of dumb reasoning that cripples nationalism. I have vastly more in common with Mr Unz (a jew) than globalists like the Clintons (whites). In fact, there’s nothing more useful than a Jew with proper ideals – because unlike Whites they can’t be disregarded by liberals and their far-fetched Holocaust-associations.
    Thanks for the article and a great website.

  29. Ron Unz disappoints me in this article, he’s supposed to be so smart and rational but the level of irrationality displayed in some parts of this article is stunning and so disappointing. Let me just pick one example to dissect, here’s an excerpt from the article:

    There was enormous national media coverage of the Till murder, which uniformly reported that the black fourteen-year-old child had merely made rude and provocative remarks to the young wife of a white shopkeeper—a “Wolf whistle”—leading to his abduction and brutal killing. Yet oddly enough, only long afterward did it emerge out that his father, a violent criminal, had been executed for multiple rapes and murder, and that Till himself, weighing 150 pounds and quite large and muscular for his age, also had a violent history

    So in the first part of the statement, Unz makes it sound like the media downplayed the severity of Till’s offense towards the white lady, but then he gives no evidence of what the supposedly more serious offense was. He points out Till’s father was a convicted murderer. Unz doesn’t mention that his dad was put to death in 1945, when Emmett was 4 years old. Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him? And HOW is that relevant to Emmett Till’s case?? Unz also points out Emmett was a large, scary 150 lb beast – lol, last time I checked, 150 lb is not big, I’m 180 lb and I wouldn’t be considered scary by a long shot. Unz also points out he had a violent history, without providing details or explaining how any of that is relevant to his encounter with the white woman. Besides, if even all these things were true, it’s still hard to argue that being lynched and murdered is a justifiable and understandable punishment for verbally harassing someone.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    And now we have an avalanche of Black on White violence, homicide, and rape, and Black on Black as well. As a White, ask me which society I would rather live in.
    , @Anonymous Nephew
    "He points out Till’s father was a convicted murderer. Unz doesn’t mention that his dad was put to death in 1945, when Emmett was 4 years old. Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him?"

    Thar depends on whether you think behaviours can be inherited.

    There's a lot of nit-picking with Mr Unz's given examples, but I don't think anyone can deny that white-on-black crime gets far more airtime and space than black-on-white crime. No one in the UK has ever heard of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom, for example, just as no one in the US has heard of Kriss Donald. Google his name, then Stephen Lawrence's, to see the difference in coverage.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    You have misunderstood the way RU was treating this story. He was using it as an illustration of possible systematic informal cover up and unless you dispute the relevance of Till being fatherless (or was there a stepfather?) except for having had a violent criminal provide half his genes and himself having a record of violence - plus the motive for not disclosing a sexual assault - it surely seems plausible to suppose that he was being punished for something much more than a wolf whistle.
    , @Anonymous Smith
    Hello.

    You wrote: "Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him?"

    Emmett Till's father would have had a huge influence on Emmett's DNA, his genetics. Psychopathy is mostly a genetic thing, whereas Sociopathy is mostly an epigenetic thing (genetic mutations arising from environmental influences, such as: blows to the head, poor diet, frequent spankings or beatings, poverty, etc.). Both are classified as antisocial personality disorders (ASPD) and both can lead to extremely violent behavior...especially in males.

    Although we can't, with any confidence, analyze Emmett Till's case from where we are today, we can glean at least one small, but important, clue from the Unz article, and that is the reference to the "wolf whistle". A wolf-whistle (I had to look it up) is when you stick your fingers in your mouth in order to amplify and project the whistling sound. Now, for a young black male to do that (which would almost certainly have been accompanied by sexually orientated proclamations of one kind or other) toward a white women, in that day and age, in Mississippi, I would say that there is a strong possibility of ASPD demonstrated in that.

    Hope this helps.
  30. @Jonathan Revusky

    I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material.
     
    I'd have to second that. I have also found Ron's articles to be consistently very worthwhile, but this one is really a very bad article. It made me cringe to read it. On the Trayvon Martin thing, I think a fair-minded assessment is that we simply don't know what happened. There were two people who did know. One is dead and the other has every reason to be less than truthful.

    I think the worst aspect of the article is his treatment of this Zebra murders case. This recently came to my attention because Steve Sailer alluded to it. I had not heard of the case. I went and looked at the wikipedia page and did some googling and it immediately struck me that the official version of events must be a total fiction. I wrote a response to that here:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/gerald-early-on-muhammad-ali/#comment-1443598

    Sailer never deigned to respond to me. Ron writes here:


    According to the later court testimony, black participants each needed to kill a total of nine white men to be awarded the coveted title of “Death Angel,” earning them the right to have their photos displayed in the Black Muslim meeting halls, while roughly double points were awarded for slaughtering white women or children, on the grounds that such killings were more psychologically difficult.
     
    The above looks utterly preposterous to me. What really happened is something quite different, I assume. For starters, it looks impossible simply because all of these groups are (and were) completely infiltrated by agents of the State.

    But, in general, the idea that people went to a temple or mosque, a place of worship, and were recruited to kill random white people and then they were going to have their pictures put on the wall.... a person with a certain level of BDQ has to be skeptical of such a narrative, I think.

    Look, the business of the Nation of Islam having some weird theology where they say that white folks are collectively the devil or the spawn of the devil -- that really has nothing to do with the notion that the NOI was actively encouraging their members to go kill random white people. The rank and file of NOI, as far as I can tell, are actually quite law abiding religious people. Even leaving aside the issue that all these groups were infiltrated and could not conduct a killing campaign over a period of half a year without the authorities knowing about it, the whole notion that, within the NOI, they are openly discussing killing random white people and everybody there is somehow okay with that -- this is all preposterous, and that Ron Unz takes this at face value is rather cringeworthy.

    My reading of the situation is that the Zebra murders were a Deep State psyop since it is impossible for a group like NOI to just be plotting and carrying out these murders without the organs of the State knowing about it. Certainly not for half a year. Probably the people they did ultimately imprison were patsies of some sort and framed for it. If that is the case, and the real killers were never caught, that could well be because there was no intention of catching them. If this was a psyop, as I suspect, the reason is obvious. It gives them a pretext for a violent crackdown on this group that they don't like. Okay, it doesn't seem that such a crackdown followed, but they would have been setting up the narrative.

    All the above said, as in the Trayvon Martin case, I simply don't know what really did happen. However, I see no sign that Ron Unz does either.

    Ahh, the Revusky school of reasoning: “I know nothing, but my intuition tells me I’m right”
    Like some contemporary shaman of the internet.

  31. @Melchizidek
    I just read this related piece about memory-holed racially motivated violence in the New Yorker:

    http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/09/19/a-buried-coup-detat-in-the-united-states?mbid=social_twitter

    One more thing:

    I object to your characterization of the Emmett Till murder. Though his father's criminality is indeed ironic, I don't think it has much bearing on the matter at hand. It would, for instance, be immediately be ruled as inadmissible and prejudicial in court. And rightly so. (And, yes, I do believe blacks are genetically more prone to criminality!)

    Emmett Till's cousins were with him, if memory serves. It doesn't seem at all likely that this white woman was raped or even assaulted in such a grave way that would have extenuated the brutal manner in which that boy was murdered.

    the judiciary system is something different from journalism, social science or history. In court there are very high thresholds to sentence somebody, and it is good that this thresholds exist. Yet truth is more than what is legally true. What everybody is interested is interested in is the bigger picture, the general patterns.
    Those people who have made a legend out of Emmet Till for decades know this aswell, as they want to draw the well-known bigger picture of a little bit more than equal, a little bit more human, healthy and good black people vs wicked white people. It is not necessary to legally “prove” that Till actually raped the alleged victim, it is enough to show that once again a seemingly simple case could be something else than most people believe.
    Simple probabilistic thinking then leads to to conclusion that when those high-profile model-cases might show a picture of black violence with non-zero likelihood, than the general picture might even more so lean in this direction.

  32. Tuskegee remains the single most complete source of statistics and records on this crime since 1882. As of 1959, which was the last time that their annual Lynch Report was published, a total of 4,733 persons had died as a result of lynching since 1882.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Statistics

    The KKK is associated in the public mind with lynching (and beating) of black people. Yes, the magnitude of their crimes is overstated but understating it does not help.

    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police. When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.

    You could have made your point without understating the crimes of the KKK or making a hero/victim of George Zimmerman.

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. “Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?” Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    Working Class: You simply lied, ignored accepted findings and evidence. Your drivel is nothing more than a fiction and agitprop. You choose to ignore the larger point of the article. If you think lying and manipulative falsehoods are a benefit to Blacks, then you are delusional and weak-minded.
    , @MQ
    Yes, I wondered why Ron didn't look up the easily available statistics on lynchings. About 3,400 of those lynchings were of black people -- a number far higher than the 15 murders he ascribes to the KKK. It doesn't justify some of the other reality distortions he mentions, but it gives a much better understanding of how violence was used to uphold the old Southern system.
    , @fnn
    It doesn't clarify matters to conflate lynching as a phenomenon with "the KKK" (which was never a centralized organization like, for example, the CPUSA even at its most organized in the 1920s). Also, about one-third of lynching victims were whites who were killed because of their (alleged) ordinary criminal activity.

    "Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police."

    Maybe Zimmerman didn't know he was living in a police state.
    , @Randal

    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman....When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.
     
    LOL! You have no reasons beyond (ironically, but not surprisingly) prejudice to assume Martin was "standing his ground". The latter does not include aggressively confronting someone with a variant of the universal thug's characteristic "who you looking at?" followed by physical violence, which is what happened according to the only witness account (Zimmerman's, obviously) we have of what happened.

    Nor is there any reason to suppose Martin had the slightest legitimate reason to fear for his life. As far as we are aware Martin had no knowledge Zimmerman was even armed until he had already attacked Zimmerman and was on top of him, beating him.

    If Martin had acted reasonably, either just going home once he had lost Zimmerman (just before he chose instead to confront him aggressively), or simply approaching him with reasonable conversation, then as far as we are aware there is no reason to suppose both men would not have been able to return to their homes perfectly safely.

    Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police.
     
    He was acting against the cowardly and self-serving advice of a police telephone operative presumably following corporate policy to advise people not to protect their property for fear of lawsuits against said police for not doing so. He was, on the other hand, doing exactly what decent citizens in a good society do do, which is to investigate potentially suspicious strangers in their own residential area.

    Good for him. The more of us who do so, the better.

    And the more aggressive thugs like Martin who die as a result of their own lack of self control and personal aggression, the better for society as a whole as a deterrent effect, if we can just somehow cure the present problem of media and others such as yourself immediately trying to defend them and demonise the good guys, for political manipulation reasons, or perhaps out of some personal mental sickness.
    , @utu
    "Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well." - This is too much to ask from race realists. Race realists and all the racists among them are serving designed for them purpose in the greater scheme of divide and rule played by the top caste.
    , @Anon

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. “Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?” Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.
     
    Why did the British carry on divide-and-conquer policies among Indians?

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/09/07/has-israel-effectively-colonized-the-united-states/
    , @Gene Su
    WorkingClass, I was looking for someone to mention the Tuskegee survey. It's too bad you didn't compare them to black on black murder rates in modern times.

    This was written by Walter Williams a few years ago:
    http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/williamns021313.php3#.V-CebtQrJhc

    Each year, more than 7,000 blacks are murdered. Close to 100 percent of the time, the murderer is another black person.

    According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, between 1976 and 2011, there were 279,384 black murder victims. Though blacks are 13 percent of the nation's population, they account for more than 50 percent of homicide victims. Nationally, the black homicide victimization rate is six times that of whites, and in some cities, it's 22 times that of whites. Coupled with being most of the nation's homicide victims, blacks are also most of the victims of violent personal crimes, such as assault and robbery. The magnitude of this tragedy can be seen in another light. According to a Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute study, between 1882 and 1968, 3,446 blacks were lynched at the hands of whites.
    , @Eagle Eye
    Are you seriously suggesting a police dispatcher with two weeks' training gets to decide whether you have a right to protect your life?
  33. Unz is the best site, period, left or right, that I have experienced. The level of discourse, and the relative freedom to express it. The authors are top shelf. Mr. Unz writes with exceptional clarity, logic, and detail. All in all, a real pleasure and asset in a World gone mad, mediocre, and venal.

  34. @WorkingClass
    Tuskegee remains the single most complete source of statistics and records on this crime since 1882. As of 1959, which was the last time that their annual Lynch Report was published, a total of 4,733 persons had died as a result of lynching since 1882.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Statistics

    The KKK is associated in the public mind with lynching (and beating) of black people. Yes, the magnitude of their crimes is overstated but understating it does not help.


    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police. When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.

    You could have made your point without understating the crimes of the KKK or making a hero/victim of George Zimmerman.

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. "Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?" Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.

    Working Class: You simply lied, ignored accepted findings and evidence. Your drivel is nothing more than a fiction and agitprop. You choose to ignore the larger point of the article. If you think lying and manipulative falsehoods are a benefit to Blacks, then you are delusional and weak-minded.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    It is extremely unhelpful and uncivil to bandy about the word "lie", and worse than that when you offer no proof of a lie - or even indeed identify what deliberate untruth the commenter has perpetrated. I say that as one who does not tend to agree with Working Class but as one who sees andllutely mo justification for your offensiveness to him.
  35. @Gail
    Ron Unz disappoints me in this article, he's supposed to be so smart and rational but the level of irrationality displayed in some parts of this article is stunning and so disappointing. Let me just pick one example to dissect, here's an excerpt from the article:

    "There was enormous national media coverage of the Till murder, which uniformly reported that the black fourteen-year-old child had merely made rude and provocative remarks to the young wife of a white shopkeeper—a “Wolf whistle”—leading to his abduction and brutal killing. Yet oddly enough, only long afterward did it emerge out that his father, a violent criminal, had been executed for multiple rapes and murder, and that Till himself, weighing 150 pounds and quite large and muscular for his age, also had a violent history"

    So in the first part of the statement, Unz makes it sound like the media downplayed the severity of Till's offense towards the white lady, but then he gives no evidence of what the supposedly more serious offense was. He points out Till's father was a convicted murderer. Unz doesn't mention that his dad was put to death in 1945, when Emmett was 4 years old. Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him? And HOW is that relevant to Emmett Till's case?? Unz also points out Emmett was a large, scary 150 lb beast - lol, last time I checked, 150 lb is not big, I'm 180 lb and I wouldn't be considered scary by a long shot. Unz also points out he had a violent history, without providing details or explaining how any of that is relevant to his encounter with the white woman. Besides, if even all these things were true, it's still hard to argue that being lynched and murdered is a justifiable and understandable punishment for verbally harassing someone.

    And now we have an avalanche of Black on White violence, homicide, and rape, and Black on Black as well. As a White, ask me which society I would rather live in.

    • Replies: @Insipidwhitetrash
    What's your source for your racist allegations, poop Marx?
  36. anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Most of these race legends fall apart when inspected closely. The woman in the Till case was apparently so agitated that she ran from her store, where the incident took place, to her vehicle to get the gun that was in it. Does that sound like only a ‘wolf-whistle’ was at issue? Her husband was later out looking for Till with the assistance of his friend JW Washington, a black man, which sort of takes the air out of the race angle.
    There’s been a number of spinoffs from the cult ideology of the Zebra killers. Illinois had the De Mau Mau group who are known to have killed at least nine whites but who knows what the actual numbers are. Looking it up there’s apparently a much larger number of these sorts of cases, some cult-like and others just crude hate killings. A person chronicling all of it would find it to be a full-time job.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Presumably the brave perpetrators get their scores up by targetting the homeless and alcoholic poor. Not much grist for the young journalist on the make's mill there.
  37. @WorkingClass
    Tuskegee remains the single most complete source of statistics and records on this crime since 1882. As of 1959, which was the last time that their annual Lynch Report was published, a total of 4,733 persons had died as a result of lynching since 1882.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Statistics

    The KKK is associated in the public mind with lynching (and beating) of black people. Yes, the magnitude of their crimes is overstated but understating it does not help.


    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police. When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.

    You could have made your point without understating the crimes of the KKK or making a hero/victim of George Zimmerman.

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. "Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?" Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.

    Yes, I wondered why Ron didn’t look up the easily available statistics on lynchings. About 3,400 of those lynchings were of black people — a number far higher than the 15 murders he ascribes to the KKK. It doesn’t justify some of the other reality distortions he mentions, but it gives a much better understanding of how violence was used to uphold the old Southern system.

    • Replies: @Randal

    Yes, I wondered why Ron didn’t look up the easily available statistics on lynchings
     
    He might well have looked them up (and he surely is aware of them), but most probably he didn't mention them in this article because he was writing about KKK killings (there are clear clues you might have spotted in the title and in the content - for instance the fact that he referenced the Wikipedia article on the KKK), rather than about lynchings or murders in general.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    As well as Randal's point is the point about the contrast in the Wikipedia write up that Ron was making.
    , @Anonymous
    Once again for you math-ignorant working-class idiots. Now try to follow along.

    34oo divided by 77 (1882 - 1959) years equals 44 lynchings per year. According to the census, in 1880 there were 7.5 million blacks in the USA. In 1960, 18.9 million. That's a mean average (good enough for our purposes) of 13.2 million blacks per year of whom 44 were lynched which works out to 1 out of 300,000 blacks lynched per year.

    Now, given that black males commit murder, rape, armed robbery, assault and burglary at the world's highest rates (in multiples of tens per 100,000), are you trying to make the argument that none of those thugs deserved to be lynched? For murder alone there would be roughly 60 black perpetrators per year. Throw in rape and armed robbery or assault and the number of perpetrators skyrockets into the hundreds. If anything, whites have been far too lenient on black males.

    This year, 1 out of 8400 Americans will be killed in automobile accidents. Thus, the likelihood of a black person's having been lynched in any year was 36 times less than of his being killed in an auto accident today.

    Try to educate yourself so that you can acquire a sense of perspective. The world makes much more sense when you see the big picture.
  38. Excellent article, Mr Unz. I particularly liked your comment about Wikipedia’s article on the Ku Klux Klan being twice the size of their article on Communism. Anyone tempted to regard Wikipedia seriously need only be directed to this. Keep up the good work, even if some of your wet blanket commenters still need to be properly enlightened about the truth concerning black violence and criminality.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    Jews who control the Western press have always held a soft spot in their hearts for Communism. Which should come as no surprise to anyone since Jews are the authors of Communism and it's most active and enthusiastic supporters. Absent Jews, there would have been no Soviet Union, and no 20 million victims of Red Terror.
  39. “the 1950s and 1960s, which represented the height of the Klan’s modern power”

    Based on my knowledge: A Formal KKK organization existed during reconstruction and a second comedic KKK revival appears either with the Stone Mountain etching, or the movie Birth of a Nation and ends with WWII *. Nostalgia-ists constantly try to revive everything, but no Klan exists after WWII just like the Nazi party of Germany and Fascist party of Italy cease to exist. And the Communist party of Russia ceases to exist after 1990.

    The Second Klan is fairly non violent for a political movement, although at this time America might have been such a non violent place, their outbursts seemed shocking. Unmentioned is the the second Klan was mostly concerned about Roman Catholic influence and immigration to the US. You can read their propaganda, for example the books of Alma Bridwell White.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alma_Bridwell_White

    The wp page claims she was antisemetic without any mention of what she did. I read one of her books “Restoration of Israel: The Hope of the World”. Crazy maybe, but not anti semetic.

    * Leo Frank most likely was not lynched by the Klan which did not exist when he was killed.

  40. There is a need for an objective summary of racial killings, i.e. black on white, white on black. Problematic to include only unjustified killings, e.g. Zebra. Better to include all. Time period arbitrary; 1900 to present by decade would work.

  41. @WorkingClass
    Tuskegee remains the single most complete source of statistics and records on this crime since 1882. As of 1959, which was the last time that their annual Lynch Report was published, a total of 4,733 persons had died as a result of lynching since 1882.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Statistics

    The KKK is associated in the public mind with lynching (and beating) of black people. Yes, the magnitude of their crimes is overstated but understating it does not help.


    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police. When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.

    You could have made your point without understating the crimes of the KKK or making a hero/victim of George Zimmerman.

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. "Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?" Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.

    It doesn’t clarify matters to conflate lynching as a phenomenon with “the KKK” (which was never a centralized organization like, for example, the CPUSA even at its most organized in the 1920s). Also, about one-third of lynching victims were whites who were killed because of their (alleged) ordinary criminal activity.

    “Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police.”

    Maybe Zimmerman didn’t know he was living in a police state.

  42. Ron, Google “Emmett Till trial transcript”. There is lots more information.

    Interesting facts (from recent memory): Emmett boasted to his young black friends how he fscked white women in Chicago. He went into the country store to show off to his buddies. He asked the young white wife for a “date”, and when she moved away from him, he either grabbed her arm or pushed her up against the counter, saying “Don’t worry, I been with [i. e. fscked] white women before.” She pulled away and retreated. He left with his friends and drove off.

    Neither the wife or her mother-in-law (also at the store) told anyone. However, Emmett’s black friends circulated the story (doubtless boosting Emmett’s street cred!) so widely that by the time the husband got back to town from his business trip, some Negro youth approached him and told him what happened.

    The husband angrily confronted his wife and extracted the full story. Later, he gathered a white buddy and two or three black hired hands. The black men got in the back of a pickup truck, the white buddy and the husband in the front, and they went looking for Emmett. At least one black eyewitness said they saw the pickup with the black men in the back restraining Emmett Till going down the road.

    The trial transcripts really flesh the story out. What we need is a REAL Emmett Till movie. I am sure we won’t get one. Emmett was a big mouth braggart who thought he was still in Chicago chasing white women. His mother warned him to behave, but he just wouldn’t.

    His death is an honor killing, that’s all. It is the same as the countless honor killings between blacks in the ghetto that occur to this very day. Once the black community started spreading the story around (particularly to the husband!), Emmett’s fate was sealed.

    • Replies: @Anon
    Regarding Till. I see a couple of points.

    First, Non Southerners were looking for a symbol. The surprising fact -- from Wikipedia, no less -- is that Southerners were disgusted with the crime.

    Mississippi's governor, Hugh L. White, deplored the murder, asserting that local authorities should pursue a "vigorous prosecution". He sent a telegram to the national offices of the NAACP promising a full investigation and assuring them "Mississippi does not condone such conduct". Delta residents, both black and white, also distanced themselves from Till's murder, finding the circumstances abhorrent. Local newspaper editorials denounced the murderers without question.[26][46] Leflore County Deputy Sheriff John Cothran stated, "The white people around here feel pretty mad about the way that poor little boy was treated, and they won't stand for this."[47]
     
    The second is that there were likely black accomplices. I don't know exactly why this was denied. But now, that will never get any traction. But is adds some nuance.

    And then, Mississippi went into a totally defensive posture.

    Till's story continued to make news for weeks following the trial, especially sparking debate between Southern, Northern, and black newspapers, the NAACP and various high-profile segregationists about justice for blacks and the propriety of Jim Crow society.

    In October 1955, the Jackson Daily News reported facts about Till's father that had been suppressed by the U.S. military. While serving in Italy, Louis Till raped two women and killed a third. He was court-martialed and hanged by the Army near Pisa in July 1945. Mamie Till Bradley and her family knew none of this, having been told only that Louis had been killed for "willful misconduct".
     
    History is always messy. Look at where we are today. 1 in every 15 African American men and 1 in every 36 Hispanic men are incarcerated in comparison to 1 in every 106 white men. 2.Mar 13, 2012
    I'm sure this statistic is supposed to illustrate that society is racist, since all men are equal. But, of course, extra judicial intimidation was no longer ignored, and this is where we end up.
  43. @MQ
    Yes, I wondered why Ron didn't look up the easily available statistics on lynchings. About 3,400 of those lynchings were of black people -- a number far higher than the 15 murders he ascribes to the KKK. It doesn't justify some of the other reality distortions he mentions, but it gives a much better understanding of how violence was used to uphold the old Southern system.

    Yes, I wondered why Ron didn’t look up the easily available statistics on lynchings

    He might well have looked them up (and he surely is aware of them), but most probably he didn’t mention them in this article because he was writing about KKK killings (there are clear clues you might have spotted in the title and in the content – for instance the fact that he referenced the Wikipedia article on the KKK), rather than about lynchings or murders in general.

  44. A good article, but Ron makes the mistake of being rational (focusing on death tolls), when everyone knows the real crime of the KKK pertains to thought, not to mention those spoooooky outfits. This makes them 1000 times worse than Stalin and Pol Pot combined, according to Hillary supporters. Except in Robert Byrd’s case; that was a youthful indescretion.

  45. @Anonymous
    The white iSteve crowd here will probably take from this article "Why is the white man always being targeted etc etc."

    But those whites, and apparently not Unz himself, care to dig deeper and find out why this is the case. What group would benefit from this arrangement?

    Why keep antogonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people? Just look at who actually started the KKK. It was a Jew who started it to trap all those angry white iSteve types into hating blacks and to serve their role in creating a boogeyman the elites could use.

    I thought the Klan was founded on Christmas Eve, 1865, in Tennessee, by Gen. Bedford Forrest and a few ex-Confederate soldiers.

    Who was the Jew?

  46. @WorkingClass
    Tuskegee remains the single most complete source of statistics and records on this crime since 1882. As of 1959, which was the last time that their annual Lynch Report was published, a total of 4,733 persons had died as a result of lynching since 1882.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Statistics

    The KKK is associated in the public mind with lynching (and beating) of black people. Yes, the magnitude of their crimes is overstated but understating it does not help.


    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police. When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.

    You could have made your point without understating the crimes of the KKK or making a hero/victim of George Zimmerman.

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. "Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?" Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.

    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman….When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.

    LOL! You have no reasons beyond (ironically, but not surprisingly) prejudice to assume Martin was “standing his ground”. The latter does not include aggressively confronting someone with a variant of the universal thug’s characteristic “who you looking at?” followed by physical violence, which is what happened according to the only witness account (Zimmerman’s, obviously) we have of what happened.

    Nor is there any reason to suppose Martin had the slightest legitimate reason to fear for his life. As far as we are aware Martin had no knowledge Zimmerman was even armed until he had already attacked Zimmerman and was on top of him, beating him.

    If Martin had acted reasonably, either just going home once he had lost Zimmerman (just before he chose instead to confront him aggressively), or simply approaching him with reasonable conversation, then as far as we are aware there is no reason to suppose both men would not have been able to return to their homes perfectly safely.

    Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police.

    He was acting against the cowardly and self-serving advice of a police telephone operative presumably following corporate policy to advise people not to protect their property for fear of lawsuits against said police for not doing so. He was, on the other hand, doing exactly what decent citizens in a good society do do, which is to investigate potentially suspicious strangers in their own residential area.

    Good for him. The more of us who do so, the better.

    And the more aggressive thugs like Martin who die as a result of their own lack of self control and personal aggression, the better for society as a whole as a deterrent effect, if we can just somehow cure the present problem of media and others such as yourself immediately trying to defend them and demonise the good guys, for political manipulation reasons, or perhaps out of some personal mental sickness.

  47. The thing about lynchings is that there were no local PD’s in most small towns at the time, just a sheriff at most, so communal justice was the norm.

    • Replies: @unadorned
    I don't believe communal justice was the norm. Many people fail to understand that hanging was the means of execution long before electric chairs and lethal injection; and remained the method of putting criminals to death, in some states, even after these more modern methods became available.
  48. @Gail
    Ron Unz disappoints me in this article, he's supposed to be so smart and rational but the level of irrationality displayed in some parts of this article is stunning and so disappointing. Let me just pick one example to dissect, here's an excerpt from the article:

    "There was enormous national media coverage of the Till murder, which uniformly reported that the black fourteen-year-old child had merely made rude and provocative remarks to the young wife of a white shopkeeper—a “Wolf whistle”—leading to his abduction and brutal killing. Yet oddly enough, only long afterward did it emerge out that his father, a violent criminal, had been executed for multiple rapes and murder, and that Till himself, weighing 150 pounds and quite large and muscular for his age, also had a violent history"

    So in the first part of the statement, Unz makes it sound like the media downplayed the severity of Till's offense towards the white lady, but then he gives no evidence of what the supposedly more serious offense was. He points out Till's father was a convicted murderer. Unz doesn't mention that his dad was put to death in 1945, when Emmett was 4 years old. Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him? And HOW is that relevant to Emmett Till's case?? Unz also points out Emmett was a large, scary 150 lb beast - lol, last time I checked, 150 lb is not big, I'm 180 lb and I wouldn't be considered scary by a long shot. Unz also points out he had a violent history, without providing details or explaining how any of that is relevant to his encounter with the white woman. Besides, if even all these things were true, it's still hard to argue that being lynched and murdered is a justifiable and understandable punishment for verbally harassing someone.

    “He points out Till’s father was a convicted murderer. Unz doesn’t mention that his dad was put to death in 1945, when Emmett was 4 years old. Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him?”

    Thar depends on whether you think behaviours can be inherited.

    There’s a lot of nit-picking with Mr Unz’s given examples, but I don’t think anyone can deny that white-on-black crime gets far more airtime and space than black-on-white crime. No one in the UK has ever heard of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom, for example, just as no one in the US has heard of Kriss Donald. Google his name, then Stephen Lawrence’s, to see the difference in coverage.

  49. @Sam J.
    "... By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor..."

    So if White people, or Mexicans or mixed race people, follow Blacks they should have their heads pounded into concrete?

    Good to know and certainly clarifies the differences between the races.

    Did he follow after he was told that he didn’t “need to do that” (not ordered to stop btw)? If you listen to the 911 call on youtube, Zimmerman is running and breathing heavily, after he is told he doesn’t need to follow, he stops running and breathing heavily and tell the 911 operator that he has lost visual contact with Martin. So at what point does Zimmerman follow Martin after being told to stop?

  50. Lynchings

    http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynchingyear.html

    White 1297
    Black 3445
    Total 4742

    A disparity that understates black comparative predilection for violent crime today.

    • Replies: @Barnard
    The state breakdown is also interesting. Virginia and North Carolina had relatively low numbers compared with the rest of the South.

    http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynchingsstate.html

    The thing about lynchings is that there were no local PD’s in most small towns at the time, just a sheriff at most, so communal justice was the norm.
     
    A lot these lynchings were how rural law enforcement of serious crimes was handled by communities without their own police. The cause listed in 41% of lynches is homicide and rape is listed in 19%. I would be interested in seeing what is all covered by "all other causes" at 22%.

    http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/Lynchcauses.html
  51. @Jim Christian
    Nah, fuck Trayon. He was in the neighborhood to steal, he didn't live there. Like with the cop and Michael Brown, Zimmerman was an inconvenience to his prowling and he was enraged because: Black privilege to steal. And like Michael Brown, the criminal Travon assaulted someone he shouldn't have and got what was coming to him like any thug. The jury let Zimmerman go. But the cops knew what they knew, they covered it, cowed by the press as they were. Furthermore, the Black-run Federal government, try as mightily as they possibly could to blame the cop, had to admit the truth, much too late as even they knew the truth immediately (never waste a good opportunity). They KNEW Michael Brown, from the start of the investigation, initiated the fight with the cop. But to allow plenty of time for #Blacklivesmatter and all that came from that, they withheld the truth. The Feds knew from the outset that "Hands up don't shoot" was a fucking lie and they held out the truth for months.

    Spare us your platitudes about disagreeable material. Dragging out the benign WASPS is ridiculous. This is Black America at it's finest and YOUR objections on the reportage is just more coverup. You are of the very same reprehensible element that would put the mothers of certified criminal psychopaths on the stage of the Democrat National Convention. These are the mothers of criminal Blacks justifiably killed in righteous police shootings by those commissioned to protect us. And these mothers are celebrated for the monsters THEY created that the arm of the law put down. Don't turn reality upside down, Bob. This is 2016, not the KKK of the 40s-70s, who were all Democrats in any case.

    In much the same fashion the Klan actually devoted most of its efforts to paying a night time “spiritual adjustment” visit to some white trash guy who was pissing his money away on booze, card games and whores while his wife and children went barefoot and hungry, Bob Johnson is in desperate need of an unexpected nocturnal visit.

  52. There is not, and never has been, any one organization identifiable as THE Ku Klux Klan; there have been and continue to be, various similar but distinct organizations existing concurrently; at present it’s doubtful that the combined membership of all these groups exceeds 1000.

    Just thought I’d throw that in, folks.

  53. @Anonymous
    The white iSteve crowd here will probably take from this article "Why is the white man always being targeted etc etc."

    But those whites, and apparently not Unz himself, care to dig deeper and find out why this is the case. What group would benefit from this arrangement?

    Why keep antogonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people? Just look at who actually started the KKK. It was a Jew who started it to trap all those angry white iSteve types into hating blacks and to serve their role in creating a boogeyman the elites could use.

    This seems quite inconsiztent with the media suppression that Ron notes.

  54. @Jonathan Revusky

    I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material.
     
    I'd have to second that. I have also found Ron's articles to be consistently very worthwhile, but this one is really a very bad article. It made me cringe to read it. On the Trayvon Martin thing, I think a fair-minded assessment is that we simply don't know what happened. There were two people who did know. One is dead and the other has every reason to be less than truthful.

    I think the worst aspect of the article is his treatment of this Zebra murders case. This recently came to my attention because Steve Sailer alluded to it. I had not heard of the case. I went and looked at the wikipedia page and did some googling and it immediately struck me that the official version of events must be a total fiction. I wrote a response to that here:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/gerald-early-on-muhammad-ali/#comment-1443598

    Sailer never deigned to respond to me. Ron writes here:


    According to the later court testimony, black participants each needed to kill a total of nine white men to be awarded the coveted title of “Death Angel,” earning them the right to have their photos displayed in the Black Muslim meeting halls, while roughly double points were awarded for slaughtering white women or children, on the grounds that such killings were more psychologically difficult.
     
    The above looks utterly preposterous to me. What really happened is something quite different, I assume. For starters, it looks impossible simply because all of these groups are (and were) completely infiltrated by agents of the State.

    But, in general, the idea that people went to a temple or mosque, a place of worship, and were recruited to kill random white people and then they were going to have their pictures put on the wall.... a person with a certain level of BDQ has to be skeptical of such a narrative, I think.

    Look, the business of the Nation of Islam having some weird theology where they say that white folks are collectively the devil or the spawn of the devil -- that really has nothing to do with the notion that the NOI was actively encouraging their members to go kill random white people. The rank and file of NOI, as far as I can tell, are actually quite law abiding religious people. Even leaving aside the issue that all these groups were infiltrated and could not conduct a killing campaign over a period of half a year without the authorities knowing about it, the whole notion that, within the NOI, they are openly discussing killing random white people and everybody there is somehow okay with that -- this is all preposterous, and that Ron Unz takes this at face value is rather cringeworthy.

    My reading of the situation is that the Zebra murders were a Deep State psyop since it is impossible for a group like NOI to just be plotting and carrying out these murders without the organs of the State knowing about it. Certainly not for half a year. Probably the people they did ultimately imprison were patsies of some sort and framed for it. If that is the case, and the real killers were never caught, that could well be because there was no intention of catching them. If this was a psyop, as I suspect, the reason is obvious. It gives them a pretext for a violent crackdown on this group that they don't like. Okay, it doesn't seem that such a crackdown followed, but they would have been setting up the narrative.

    All the above said, as in the Trayvon Martin case, I simply don't know what really did happen. However, I see no sign that Ron Unz does either.

    OK JR,

    Since we’re usually in agreement, I’ll bounce my thoughts on this into the blogosphere..

    This is a brave and powerful article by Mr. Unz. It touches on a verboten subject and eviscerates and holds high the dripping entrails of the Orwellian mendacity enshrouding the length and breath of our entire society, from top to bottom. – That there is a knee-jerk hostility to Western (white) culture and people emanating out of all of our cultural institutions (and especially Hollywood) is so plainly obvious to anyone with eyes and ears that we all just take it for granted.

    That the rape and murder (and horrific treatment) of that teenage white girl wasn’t reported in the news isn’t going to raise eyebrows anywhere. We all know that’s how it works. It’s a one way street. If a black person is a victim, (or even if they aren’t, as in the case of the Duke “rapists”, or Travon, or Michael Brown, etcetera ad nauseam.. ) the media will shriek hysterically for days on end, until the whole world! (literally) knows about the Duke “rapists” or the numinous Travon, with his picture at 12 years old. Obama’s son.

    But if it’s a white victim, like the young people who died during the Wichita massacre, or Channon Christian and her boyfriend, then no one will have ever heard of them outside the local news.

    It goes like this with every crime and even historical events. Everything is filtered through the sieve of political correctness.

    Have you ever heard of the Holocaust JR? It seems to me there was a movie, or perhaps even two that were made about that event, yet there were over a hundred million victims of communism during the 20th century. Now, I can’t remember the names of all those movies they made about the Holodomor (the genocide of white Christians by the millions by starvation). Didn’t Steven Spielberg direct and Harvey Weinstein produce that big budget one?

    Have you ever heard about the black slavery that was once practiced in this country JR?

    I think they made a movie about it, if I’m not mistaken. But how many movies have they made about the genocidal treatment of innocent German civilians (who died by the millions after the second war was over). How many movies have they made about the monstrous and historical war crime of Dresden JR?

    Is it possible that our cultural institutions, and the media in particular- are in the hands of a people with a near monolithic contempt (hatred) for all things German? and consider their suffering and deaths by the millions to be of no consequence or concern? Just like the little white girl who is gang raped for days on end and then fed to alligators- when the sub-humans got done with her.

    Indeed, I suspect that right now, reading these words I’m typing, there is a very large percentage of people who’re far more 0utraged at my characterization of these savage animals as “sub-humans” than they are at the incomprehensible suffering of that little girl, (and her loved ones). And that is all part of our carefully constructed programming. We’re more sensitive to racial epitaphs than to a girl being fed to alligators.

    And all of that is to be expected. Because they don’t do what they do for nothing JR. All of our memes and paradigms and narratives that make us all think and feel about events and the world around us are all part of our programming. None of us are born knowing the truth about the world and our place in it. We rely first on our parents and family to understand the world, and then on the media, the print and radio and television, (and only recently the Internet). So if the media, is (and I use the singular present tense verb ‘is’ deliberately) telling us that most all young, black teenage males are desperately trying to graduate and get their degrees so they can rise above all the racism that permeates our (irredeemably racist) society but then almost always while in their prime, and unarmed and walking around with their hands up and pleading not to get shot at least this one time- by yet another racist white [redundant] man with a gun, (often but not always with a badge too)- then this meme will take hold. It’s guaranteed to, and that of course is the point.

    Now just for the record, there are racist white (and black and brown, etc..) men. And there are criminals and thugs and even murderers with guns and badges. But from what I’ve glimmered, most of America’s cops, while being far too arrogant and thuggish, are nominally professionals. And if you, the reader, had to pick between your family’s health and well being at the at the mercy of your typical urban young black men in America vs. the police, well then I can tell you that I know the streets, and I know Detroit and Miami, and there are places that they’d cut you to pieces as much as look at you. We get a very skewed version of reality from our msm, than exists in the real world, let me tell ya.

    And what follows is the obvious question why?

    Anyone with two peanuts rolling around in their noggins knows that Jews overwhelmingly own and control our msm. Duh. So the question becomes why do they treat white Americans with such overt hostility? Why are we (especially white, straight, southern, Christian men) always depicted as evil or pathetic- always deplorable? And irredeemable?

    (Perhaps not always, of course. But that is the meme. And we all know it).

    Is this hostility cultural, religious, or something more intractable?

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men – as congenital, if latent Nazis? Is that why they relentlessly foist non-white immigration on all white nations? Are they trying to protect themselves from a future potential holocaust by eliminating the threat in advance? What are the chances they might be creating the threat where none exists- with their ‘cure’?

    Anyways, sorry for ruminating here on larger philosophical ramblings, but this article for me brings up important and extremely relevant questions.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men – as congenital, if latent Nazis?
     
    jeezus krist on tortilla, Rurik.

    try to analyze Nazism for what it actually was, not what the very same "Jewish controlled media" has brainwashed you to believe it was.

    Unz essayed on the massive propaganda effort the British executed to involve USA in WWII (as also WWI, but that's another story).

    Jews were equally involved in propagandizing USA to get Americans to acquiesce to WWII.
    Jews were deeply involved in psychological warfare against Germans for over five years post-war
    to substantiate both points, see Cora Sol Goldstein, "Capturing the German Eye."

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.

    Every time you use the analogy, "zionism = Nazi;" or Jews = 'latent Nazis,' you're fellating Bibi, deep and long, and he's in pervert heaven.

    Hitler had the effrontery to resist "Jewish control of media," and for that offense, Deutschland delenda est.

    Move beyond the brainwashing.

    Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from "Jewish control of media," nonviolently -- or to borrow Richard Breitman's phrase, "semi-legally," and in your cogitations, consider how the example of the destruction of Germany serves as a warning; and how the people of the USA are to avoid the same treatment.
    , @roofgoat
    your post should be required reading for all middle school students.
    , @Anonymous Smith
    I agree with almost every thing you said, Rurik. The only things I disagree with are your thoughts on the Holocaust, and your characterization of the causes of Jewish paranoia.

    It's obvious that you know next to nothing about the Holocaust. It's nothing to be ashamed of, mind you, as we have all been subjected to the relentless brainwashing program centered on the Jewish Holocaust mythology. I urge you to investigate the Holocaust with much more diligence, and rigor, than you have. By doing this you will be able to clear your mind of a huge cloud of Jewish brainwashing. A great place to start would be the writings of David Irving...the Jews absolutely despise him and have gone to great lengths to smear and attack him; there is "anti-Irving" propaganda that has been inserted into one or two Hollywood movies. Irving has also been viciously attacked by the MSM...they accused him of providing the trigger mechanisms for the Oklahoma city bomb! Ernst Zundel is another good one...he's been jailed several times for his efforts to get the truth out to the people. Fred Leuchter and Robert Faurisson are also good...the Jews beat the shit out of Faurisson on a couple of occasions.

    The Hostile Jewish Elite do not fear and distrust white folks because they might be closet-Nazi's. They practically invented the entire Nazi-as-mass-murderer narrative, so, why would they be apprehensive about some fictitious idea that they themselves created? The real reason they fear and distrust white people in particular is because they're up to no good and they're deeply afraid we'll discover their treacheries!

    Well, we are uncovering their intrigues and bringing them into the light. They are terrified by our rapid progress and are frantically trying to impede us in every possible way. It's good that people are waking up to the clandestine programs of the International Jew, but, there is a massive downside to our truth-telling efforts...the more truth we expose the more hostile and violent they become!
    , @Rehmat
    You're suffering from "White Victim Mentality" dude. The White race has long been made impotent by the Organized Jewry which not only rule Europe now, but also United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Therefore, there is no chance of a new Jewish ethnic-cleansing in the White societies.

    The reasons the pro-Israel Jewish groups support Muslim immigration to the West, is, a)get rid of anti-Israel Arabs from the Middle East, and 2) to use Muslim immigrants to create anti-West false flag operations to prove that Europe has not got rid of its centuries-old anti-Semitism.

    There 15 European nations where insulting Islam is "freedom of speech", but challenging the 6-million Jewish death myth is a crime punishable with 3-year in jail or a heavy fine - or both.

    But don't worry, Israel has found several HITLERS among non-Whites such as Bishop Tutu, Ahmadinejad, Bashar al-Assad, etc. who are set to leash another Jewish Holocaust.

    In September 2014, South African Jewish weekly, 'The Jewish Report' in an Op-Ed, entitled ‘Arch no better than Hitler or Stalin’ written by country’s Israeli Likud party president Leon Reich, equating South Africa’s former Archbishop Desmond Tutu with Adolf Hitler and Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

    “Just as it was more important for Hitler to kill Jews than protect the fatherland in the last days of (WW II) war so it is more important for Tutu to kill Jews rather to protect his fellow Christians,” wrote Reich.....

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/09/16/s-a-jew-leader-bishop-tutu-is-adolf-hitler/
    , @Rehmat
    You're suffering from "White Victim Mentality" dude. The White race has long been made impotent by the Organized Jewry which not only rule Europe now, but also United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Therefore, there is no chance of a new Jewish ethnic-cleansing in the White societies.

    The reasons the pro-Israel Jewish groups support Muslim immigration to the West, is, a)get rid of anti-Israel Arabs from the Middle East, and 2) to use Muslim immigrants to create anti-West false flag operations to prove that Europe has not got rid of its centuries-old anti-Semitism.

    There 15 European nations where insulting Islam is "freedom of speech", but challenging the 6-million Jewish death myth is a crime punishable with 3-year in jail or a heavy fine - or both.

    But don't worry, Israel has found several HITLERS among non-Whites such as Bishop Tutu, Ahmadinejad, Bashar al-Assad, etc. who are set to leash another Jewish Holocaust.

    In September 2014, South African Jewish weekly, 'The Jewish Report' in an Op-Ed, entitled ‘Arch no better than Hitler or Stalin’ written by country’s Israeli Likud party president Leon Reich, equating South Africa’s former Archbishop Desmond Tutu with Adolf Hitler and Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

    “Just as it was more important for Hitler to kill Jews than protect the fatherland in the last days of (WW II) war so it is more important for Tutu to kill Jews rather to protect his fellow Christians,” wrote Reich.....

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/09/16/s-a-jew-leader-bishop-tutu-is-adolf-hitler/
    , @Jonathan Revusky
    Rurik, you should know by now that I am very fact oriented. I don't object to your various "philosophical ramblings" mind you, and I suppose I agree with much of it -- though not all.... BUT the thing is that my problems with Ron's article are not philosophical so much as factual issues.

    Most of the comment you are replying to, I am expressing my extreme skepticism about this account of the Zebra murders in the 1970's. I read the official story and have a very hard time believing that this is what really happened.

    Moreover, Ron makes no mention of things like Cointelpro, and the sheer extent to which any anti-system sort of group from black nationalists to white nationalists were infiltrated by Deep State agents. I mean, probably the main reason that there has been no significant violence from the KKK in the last half century or so is that the group is so entirely infiltrated by Deep State agents that it would be impossible for them to do squat anyway. And, yes, the continued existence of some sort of KKK that never does shit is something useful. It's just an element of Deep State theater. In the terms of my last article, "it's part of the show".

    And then when any of these groups actually do something, I think the baseline assumption should be that it is some sort of sting operation, run by the FBI, say. If tomorrow the KKK came out of their lethargy and lynched some black folks for real, or whatever other act of terrorism, I would immediately wonder whether this is some sort of Deep State psy op. I would reason that these people are so infiltrated by the organs of the State that they can't really plan and execute anything without the authorities knowing about it.

    Moreover, what you have with these Zebra murders is a narrative in which these Black Muslims are committing all these murders with no real motive. I mean, they just hate white folks, if that's a motive. And somehow they're doing this for 6 months straight and the authorities have no idea what is going on.... You know, I see patterns, Rurik. Why did Oswald kill Kennedy? He was a commie? He was fucked up in the head? Bottom line: no motive. Why did Jack Ruby kill Oswald? He wanted to show that "Jews have balls". Bullshit. Why did James Earl Ray kill Martin Luther King? I looked that one up recently. I assumed that it was ascribed to a racial motive, but no, apparently James Earl Ray killed King to obtain something called "ego gratification". In other words, he murdered MLK because it would make him feel good about himself. Again, bullshit. No motive.

    Normally when you have a crime, you look for means and motive. All this sequence of crimes where the alleged perpetrators have no motive... it gives off a funny smell to me...

    And all that above stuff is bullshit, right? Oswald, James Earl Ray.... those two guys certainly didn't kill anybody. Jack Ruby did but it wasn't to show that Jews have balls.

    So when you tell me that these Zebra murders happened because these people hated white people so much to just kill random white people, alarm bells go off with me, because, over the last few years, I have devoted some energy to studying these false flag terrorism events, like Gladio in Italy and so forth. And I look at these things in Europe more recently, and YES, 9/11.....

    You argue as if I'm saying things I'm not saying. I never said there was no black criminal element and so on and I never contested that the media was under-reporting black on white crimes. You're arguing as if I was saying things I was not saying.

    The main thing I want to get across is that this Zebra murders narrative is very very strange. Even if it were to turn out (much to my surprise) that the official story on this is true, it is not within the normal run of black on white crimes. I assume the "normal" black on white crime is some thug hitting you over the head and taking your wallet or something. Or they rob a liquor store. Or something. This Zebra murders thing is something very very different. It's taking something very exceptional and then waving one's hands and creating generalizations about it. There is something very strange about what Ron is doing in this article. It makes me very uncomfortable on various levels. But primarily, it's the factual level. I just find this official story on the Zebra murders very hard to believe. It feels to me like there is something else going on here -- Cointelpro, Deep State sort of stuff.
    , @Ace
    Very good but I your point that America's cops are far too arrogant and thuggish is not well taken. I've had dealings with a fair number of American cops and they've been uniformly courteous and reasonable but for one minor case where it was an obvious speed trap at the bottom of the hill.
  55. Wonderful article.

    We hear of young black men and their complaints about being stereotyped as violent. But that’s like complaining about the stereotype that the sky is blue or that water is wet. If any man said “I’m sad because I get stereotyped as more violent than a woman” people would laugh at him, and rightly so. Black men, as a group, rob, rape, and kill in astronomical numbers. Instead of worrying about this fact and trying to do something about it, the media focuses on the natural and inevitable consequence that people will develop stereotypes about this fact.

    Liberals’ belief in racial equality is so absurd and so contradicted by reason that, like communist economics, it requires nonstop censorship and propaganda for anyone to believe it.

    • Replies: @David In TN
    A stereotype is based on reality.
    , @Insipidwhitetrash
    "Black men, as a group, rob, rape and kill in in astronomical numbers." Based in which source? Do you even know the definition of "astronomical"? Here are some statistics for you bitch:
    Homicides in the US by victim and perpetrator.
    Blacks killed by white 4.4 *
    Whites killed by black 1.8 *
    Whites killed by white 10.1 *
    *As a share of each ethnic group's population.
    By the way, I'm Mexican
  56. @WorkingClass
    Tuskegee remains the single most complete source of statistics and records on this crime since 1882. As of 1959, which was the last time that their annual Lynch Report was published, a total of 4,733 persons had died as a result of lynching since 1882.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Statistics

    The KKK is associated in the public mind with lynching (and beating) of black people. Yes, the magnitude of their crimes is overstated but understating it does not help.


    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police. When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.

    You could have made your point without understating the crimes of the KKK or making a hero/victim of George Zimmerman.

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. "Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?" Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.

    “Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.” – This is too much to ask from race realists. Race realists and all the racists among them are serving designed for them purpose in the greater scheme of divide and rule played by the top caste.

    • Replies: @Rurik

    Race realists and all the racists among them are serving designed for them purpose in the greater scheme of divide and rule played by the top caste.
     
    while I agree that much of the BLM and media hysteria surrounding some non-racist crimes turned into racist crimes by the media (Travon) is intended to create hatred in the black community for white folks in general, and thereby foist a distraction from the real crimes of wars and monumental Wall Street swindles, etc...

    there does in my mind remain the quandary of 'race realism'

    let's put it this way...

    your seventeen year old daughter tells you she's going out with some friends for the night, and might be back late

    when they drive up to pick up your daughter, you notice the fellows in the car are the men in the photos of this story.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3762863/Girl-17-went-missing-Myrtle-Beach-2009-gang-raped-shot-fed-alligators-says-FBI-agent.html

    They seem age appropriate, don't get out of the car to come greet you but rather hang out with their hip-hop music thumping.. waiting for your daughter

    Now, what do you do as a father. Last weekend you let your daughter go out with some young white boys from her school and they brought her home safe after a fun evening. Now if you tell your daughter that you have reservations about her going with these fellows, guess what she's going to say? She's going to tremble, and perhaps begin shaking a little and her skin may flush and other subtle signs of intense agitation at the creeping moral horror and nauseating realization that OMG! - her very own dad is.. Oh God she can't even say it. A racist !

    She'll never look at you the same. She'll whisper to her friends (since at least she's still alive) that she never would have imagined that her own papa is a fucking racist

    Your reputation with her entire group of friends and their parents and the entire community will be destroyed, perhaps for ever.

    That for me is the kind of conundrum that must be happening all over the increasingly diverse Western world when it comes to hard race realism. Can you imagine an American father telling his seventeen year old daughter to perhaps have a little suspicion of young black men in hoodies and acting like thugs. It might cause a rift between you and your daughter that might never heal. But at least she'd be less likely to be gang raped for day on end and then fed to alligators.
    , @WorkingClass
    I have no problem with race realists. They are at pains to point out that race is real and that there are real behavioral differences between races. It's the groupies I object to. People who take a scum bag like George Zimmerman for a hero. I maintain that all participants in identity politics are tools of the ruling class. And that black and white can hate each other on their own time if they want to but our day job is to unite against the .01%
  57. @Jonathan Revusky

    I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material.
     
    I'd have to second that. I have also found Ron's articles to be consistently very worthwhile, but this one is really a very bad article. It made me cringe to read it. On the Trayvon Martin thing, I think a fair-minded assessment is that we simply don't know what happened. There were two people who did know. One is dead and the other has every reason to be less than truthful.

    I think the worst aspect of the article is his treatment of this Zebra murders case. This recently came to my attention because Steve Sailer alluded to it. I had not heard of the case. I went and looked at the wikipedia page and did some googling and it immediately struck me that the official version of events must be a total fiction. I wrote a response to that here:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/gerald-early-on-muhammad-ali/#comment-1443598

    Sailer never deigned to respond to me. Ron writes here:


    According to the later court testimony, black participants each needed to kill a total of nine white men to be awarded the coveted title of “Death Angel,” earning them the right to have their photos displayed in the Black Muslim meeting halls, while roughly double points were awarded for slaughtering white women or children, on the grounds that such killings were more psychologically difficult.
     
    The above looks utterly preposterous to me. What really happened is something quite different, I assume. For starters, it looks impossible simply because all of these groups are (and were) completely infiltrated by agents of the State.

    But, in general, the idea that people went to a temple or mosque, a place of worship, and were recruited to kill random white people and then they were going to have their pictures put on the wall.... a person with a certain level of BDQ has to be skeptical of such a narrative, I think.

    Look, the business of the Nation of Islam having some weird theology where they say that white folks are collectively the devil or the spawn of the devil -- that really has nothing to do with the notion that the NOI was actively encouraging their members to go kill random white people. The rank and file of NOI, as far as I can tell, are actually quite law abiding religious people. Even leaving aside the issue that all these groups were infiltrated and could not conduct a killing campaign over a period of half a year without the authorities knowing about it, the whole notion that, within the NOI, they are openly discussing killing random white people and everybody there is somehow okay with that -- this is all preposterous, and that Ron Unz takes this at face value is rather cringeworthy.

    My reading of the situation is that the Zebra murders were a Deep State psyop since it is impossible for a group like NOI to just be plotting and carrying out these murders without the organs of the State knowing about it. Certainly not for half a year. Probably the people they did ultimately imprison were patsies of some sort and framed for it. If that is the case, and the real killers were never caught, that could well be because there was no intention of catching them. If this was a psyop, as I suspect, the reason is obvious. It gives them a pretext for a violent crackdown on this group that they don't like. Okay, it doesn't seem that such a crackdown followed, but they would have been setting up the narrative.

    All the above said, as in the Trayvon Martin case, I simply don't know what really did happen. However, I see no sign that Ron Unz does either.

    Zimmerman was half Jewish right?
    He certainly doesn’t strike me as having any righteous character,and with all the subsequent crap he’s done, I wouldn’t believe him an iota.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    I haven't heard either about Zimmerman being "part Jewish" or the "subsequent crap" so would be pleased to read your elucidation.
    , @Jonathan Revusky
    Well, I already stated my position on the Trayvon case. My position is simply that I don't know.

    What fascinates me about the situation is how people who cannot possibly know either express such certainty that they know what happened. That is a very interesting phenomenon.
  58. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @WorkingClass
    Tuskegee remains the single most complete source of statistics and records on this crime since 1882. As of 1959, which was the last time that their annual Lynch Report was published, a total of 4,733 persons had died as a result of lynching since 1882.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching_in_the_United_States#Statistics

    The KKK is associated in the public mind with lynching (and beating) of black people. Yes, the magnitude of their crimes is overstated but understating it does not help.


    Trayvon Martin was stalked by a violence prone and armed George Zimmerman. Zimmerman was acting against the instructions of local police. When Martin turned to stand his ground he was murdered by Zimmerman.

    You could have made your point without understating the crimes of the KKK or making a hero/victim of George Zimmerman.

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. "Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?" Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. “Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?” Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.

    Why did the British carry on divide-and-conquer policies among Indians?

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/09/07/has-israel-effectively-colonized-the-united-states/

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Thanks for the Counterpunch link. At least very clever. What a pity Rehmat isn't in the same league.
  59. The notorious KKK’s record of burning Blacks pales to the victims of Las Vegas Jewish crime mafia.

    Interestingly, while the America’s Jewish-controlled politicians and media never stop demonizing Dr. David Duke for supporting Donald Trump – they glorify members of their tribal murderers and looters.

    In 2012, the Jewish Mayor of Las Vegas Carolyn Goodman opened to public ‘The National Museum of Organized Crime and Law Enforcement’ on February 15, honoring some of America’s most notorious Jewish mobsters. The museum is located in downtown Las Vegas, a city created by crime gangsters. The project was her husband, the former Mayor of Las Vegas, Oscar Goodman. The museum has already picked a rightful name: the Mob Museum. Watch a video below.

    Oscar Baylin Goodman, former attorney of many top Jewish crime bosses. In 2010, Goodman called Obama “someone with psychological hang-up” for advising Americans not to waste their hard-earned money on gambling and prostitution. Goodman is in favor of legalized prostitution to increase city’s tax income.

    Goodman’s Jewish gangster clients included Meyer Lansky, Frank ‘Lefty’ Rosenthal and Herbert Blitzstein. The other well-known Jewish gansters were Bugsy Siegal, Longy Zwillman, Dutch Schultz, Abraham Twist Kid Reles, Pep Strauss, Mendy Weiss, Gurrah Shapiro, Red Levine, Moe Dalitz, Berman and many others. Most of these Jewish gansters were involved in the numbers rackets, illegal drug dealing, prostitution, gambling and loan sharking. Some of them were “good Jews” who helped their fellow Jews around the world including Zionist terrorist groups in Germany, Italy and Palestine. And why these Jews adopted the crime life? Well the Zionist Jewish historians do have the obvious excuse – those gangsters were victims of ‘anti-Semitism’!

    Some of these Jewish gangsters provided funds and guns to Jewish terrorist groups to terrorize native Palestinian Muslims and Christians and grab 78% of their land.

    https://rehmat1.com/2012/04/04/las-vegas-museum-honors-jewish-mobsters/

  60. @The Alarmist

    "... the near-absolute media blackout has been quite remarkably Orwellian and deeply disturbing."
     
    Not really ... this is how the ruling class hope to keep the lid on a pot that always seems close to boiling over. In the old days, letting it boil over would have led to ethnic cleansing or even genocide, but if you delay and pray long enough while you re-balance the ethnic makeup of he nation, then you merely get civil war. The again, look at the ethnic cleansing going on in SoCal; seems there isn't as much solidarity among the oppressed classes as the elite might have hoped to achieve.

    Are you suggesting that there is much tacit support (as well as some open suport that I have heard) for offsetting black numbers with Latino, and also, perhaps that the MSM has been scared of stirring up more blacks to join in the racial violence against whites?

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    No, I am suggesting there is open support for offsetting the native-born somewhat creme au lait for a darker variety, but that the consequences for this preference are not quite what was expected.
  61. @Jonathan Revusky

    I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material.
     
    I'd have to second that. I have also found Ron's articles to be consistently very worthwhile, but this one is really a very bad article. It made me cringe to read it. On the Trayvon Martin thing, I think a fair-minded assessment is that we simply don't know what happened. There were two people who did know. One is dead and the other has every reason to be less than truthful.

    I think the worst aspect of the article is his treatment of this Zebra murders case. This recently came to my attention because Steve Sailer alluded to it. I had not heard of the case. I went and looked at the wikipedia page and did some googling and it immediately struck me that the official version of events must be a total fiction. I wrote a response to that here:

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/gerald-early-on-muhammad-ali/#comment-1443598

    Sailer never deigned to respond to me. Ron writes here:


    According to the later court testimony, black participants each needed to kill a total of nine white men to be awarded the coveted title of “Death Angel,” earning them the right to have their photos displayed in the Black Muslim meeting halls, while roughly double points were awarded for slaughtering white women or children, on the grounds that such killings were more psychologically difficult.
     
    The above looks utterly preposterous to me. What really happened is something quite different, I assume. For starters, it looks impossible simply because all of these groups are (and were) completely infiltrated by agents of the State.

    But, in general, the idea that people went to a temple or mosque, a place of worship, and were recruited to kill random white people and then they were going to have their pictures put on the wall.... a person with a certain level of BDQ has to be skeptical of such a narrative, I think.

    Look, the business of the Nation of Islam having some weird theology where they say that white folks are collectively the devil or the spawn of the devil -- that really has nothing to do with the notion that the NOI was actively encouraging their members to go kill random white people. The rank and file of NOI, as far as I can tell, are actually quite law abiding religious people. Even leaving aside the issue that all these groups were infiltrated and could not conduct a killing campaign over a period of half a year without the authorities knowing about it, the whole notion that, within the NOI, they are openly discussing killing random white people and everybody there is somehow okay with that -- this is all preposterous, and that Ron Unz takes this at face value is rather cringeworthy.

    My reading of the situation is that the Zebra murders were a Deep State psyop since it is impossible for a group like NOI to just be plotting and carrying out these murders without the organs of the State knowing about it. Certainly not for half a year. Probably the people they did ultimately imprison were patsies of some sort and framed for it. If that is the case, and the real killers were never caught, that could well be because there was no intention of catching them. If this was a psyop, as I suspect, the reason is obvious. It gives them a pretext for a violent crackdown on this group that they don't like. Okay, it doesn't seem that such a crackdown followed, but they would have been setting up the narrative.

    All the above said, as in the Trayvon Martin case, I simply don't know what really did happen. However, I see no sign that Ron Unz does either.

    I’m going to have to respond here because this comment illustrates only too well exactly the points that Mr. Unz is trying to make.

    First on Trayvon Williams: A lot of facts came out during the trial that NPR and other MSM outlets have chosen to ignore and bury: (1) Williams was obviously casing his new neighborhood for burglary opportunities when accosted by Zimmerman. On a rainy night he had been wandering for over 45 minutes through his new neighborhood when his path crossed Zimmerman’s. A ten minute walk would have got him back to his house where his cousin was waiting for him. (2) Testimony of Williams’s Haitian girlfriend established that Williams attacked Zimmerman based on the false belief that Zimmerman was a homosexual looking to hire Williams for a sexual tryst. (3) THe respected forensic pathologist, Vincent DeMaio, testified that ballistic and other evidence conclusivelt proved every aspect of Zimmerman’s testimony; that Zimmerman was attacked by Williams; that Williams was sitting atop Zimmerman , leaning over him, and beating his head into the ground; that Zimmerman fired up into Williams at extremely close range in a last ditch effort to save his life.

    Second on the Zebra case: Mr. Unz left out a lot of the most damning information presented in the book he cites. The FBI was involved in the case early on. They actually established a connection between the murders and a prominent, and politically connected, member of the Nation of Islam based in Chicago. FBI agents, promised that the author would not reveal their names nor that of the Chicago suspects, told the author that a decision was made in Washington not to further pursue the case because of the racial tensions it might arouse. These agents were convinced that a large number of other Negro murderers could have been brought to justice, including some very high ranking members of the Nation of Islam cult had these leads been pursued.

    • Replies: @wanderer
    Pity you got his name wrong.
    , @David In TN
    "Mr. Unz left out a lot of the most damning information presented in the book he cites."

    Absolutely. The so-called Zebra case was far worse than most people who have heard of it know. In October 1973, there was a meeting of California law enforcement officials in which it was determined over 70 white people had been killed in California in the last 2 years or so by Nation of Islam members. This was before the San Francisco "Zebra murders" had begun.

    Thomas Peele's recent book, "Killing the Messenger," about the murder of black journalist Chauncey Bailey, has a chapter on the Zebra murders. Peele tells of the "East Bay killings" taking place at the same time, which were run out a mosque in Oakland. It is believed there were 30 white victims in the East Bay, none were solved. Peele indicates the mosques in San Francisco and Oakland were in league with each other.

    There were killings in Sacramento in 1974. In this one, two NOI members were convicted. Both were paroled a few years ago after admitting their guilt and expressing remorse. One said higher-ups in the NOI had held meetings instructing them to kill white people.
    , @Jonathan Revusky

    The FBI was involved in the case early on.
     
    Uhh, yeah, I believe that. How early? :-)

    FBI agents, promised that the author would not reveal their names nor that of the Chicago suspects, told the author that a decision was made in Washington not to further pursue the case because of the racial tensions it might arouse.
     

    Well, that's that then. FBI people are straight arrow guys. They would never tell a lie.
  62. @Gail
    Ron Unz disappoints me in this article, he's supposed to be so smart and rational but the level of irrationality displayed in some parts of this article is stunning and so disappointing. Let me just pick one example to dissect, here's an excerpt from the article:

    "There was enormous national media coverage of the Till murder, which uniformly reported that the black fourteen-year-old child had merely made rude and provocative remarks to the young wife of a white shopkeeper—a “Wolf whistle”—leading to his abduction and brutal killing. Yet oddly enough, only long afterward did it emerge out that his father, a violent criminal, had been executed for multiple rapes and murder, and that Till himself, weighing 150 pounds and quite large and muscular for his age, also had a violent history"

    So in the first part of the statement, Unz makes it sound like the media downplayed the severity of Till's offense towards the white lady, but then he gives no evidence of what the supposedly more serious offense was. He points out Till's father was a convicted murderer. Unz doesn't mention that his dad was put to death in 1945, when Emmett was 4 years old. Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him? And HOW is that relevant to Emmett Till's case?? Unz also points out Emmett was a large, scary 150 lb beast - lol, last time I checked, 150 lb is not big, I'm 180 lb and I wouldn't be considered scary by a long shot. Unz also points out he had a violent history, without providing details or explaining how any of that is relevant to his encounter with the white woman. Besides, if even all these things were true, it's still hard to argue that being lynched and murdered is a justifiable and understandable punishment for verbally harassing someone.

    You have misunderstood the way RU was treating this story. He was using it as an illustration of possible systematic informal cover up and unless you dispute the relevance of Till being fatherless (or was there a stepfather?) except for having had a violent criminal provide half his genes and himself having a record of violence – plus the motive for not disclosing a sexual assault – it surely seems plausible to suppose that he was being punished for something much more than a wolf whistle.

  63. @Chico
    I agree. Many if not most adolescent males in urban or suburban areas have had the unpleasant experiance of being stalked by a "chickenhawk." Happened to me and my friends in the 1970s, This started when we were 12-13 years old, we had to run. It must be ten times worse now with gay liberation and discrimination laws.

    To Trayvon, Zimmerman probably looked like a creep stalker like Jeff Dahmer following him down an alley.

    Spoiled a good article.

    …Many if not most adolescent males in urban or suburban areas have had the unpleasant experiance of being stalked by a “chickenhawk.”…

    Congratulations! You just made the Zimmerman defense case air tight, as did Williams’s stupid, tub-of-lard, Haitian girlfriend during her trial testimony. You and she provided the reasoning that provoked Williams to attack Zimmerman. And once Zimmerman was attacked he had a perfect right – as do we all – to defend himself.

  64. The Chinese peasant’s and the Soviet citizens’ cynicism regarding the ‘news’ invite the acronym: INI, the Inverse News Indicator.

  65. @Poupon Marx
    Working Class: You simply lied, ignored accepted findings and evidence. Your drivel is nothing more than a fiction and agitprop. You choose to ignore the larger point of the article. If you think lying and manipulative falsehoods are a benefit to Blacks, then you are delusional and weak-minded.

    It is extremely unhelpful and uncivil to bandy about the word “lie”, and worse than that when you offer no proof of a lie – or even indeed identify what deliberate untruth the commenter has perpetrated. I say that as one who does not tend to agree with Working Class but as one who sees andllutely mo justification for your offensiveness to him.

  66. @Bill Jones
    Lynchings
    http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynchingyear.html

    White 1297
    Black 3445
    Total 4742

    A disparity that understates black comparative predilection for violent crime today.

    The state breakdown is also interesting. Virginia and North Carolina had relatively low numbers compared with the rest of the South.

    http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynchingsstate.html

    The thing about lynchings is that there were no local PD’s in most small towns at the time, just a sheriff at most, so communal justice was the norm.

    A lot these lynchings were how rural law enforcement of serious crimes was handled by communities without their own police. The cause listed in 41% of lynches is homicide and rape is listed in 19%. I would be interested in seeing what is all covered by “all other causes” at 22%.

    http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/Lynchcauses.html

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome


    I would be interested in seeing what is all covered by “all other causes” at 22%.

     

    Here's one example:


    The Washington herald., January 14, 1908, Page 6, Image 6
    ... A mob of North Carolina negroes lynched the proprietor of a negro theatrical outfit because his show did not come up to the advance agent's promises.

     

  67. @Rurik
    OK JR,

    Since we're usually in agreement, I'll bounce my thoughts on this into the blogosphere..

    This is a brave and powerful article by Mr. Unz. It touches on a verboten subject and eviscerates and holds high the dripping entrails of the Orwellian mendacity enshrouding the length and breath of our entire society, from top to bottom. - That there is a knee-jerk hostility to Western (white) culture and people emanating out of all of our cultural institutions (and especially Hollywood) is so plainly obvious to anyone with eyes and ears that we all just take it for granted.

    That the rape and murder (and horrific treatment) of that teenage white girl wasn't reported in the news isn't going to raise eyebrows anywhere. We all know that's how it works. It's a one way street. If a black person is a victim, (or even if they aren't, as in the case of the Duke "rapists", or Travon, or Michael Brown, etcetera ad nauseam.. ) the media will shriek hysterically for days on end, until the whole world! (literally) knows about the Duke "rapists" or the numinous Travon, with his picture at 12 years old. Obama's son.

    But if it's a white victim, like the young people who died during the Wichita massacre, or Channon Christian and her boyfriend, then no one will have ever heard of them outside the local news.

    It goes like this with every crime and even historical events. Everything is filtered through the sieve of political correctness.

    Have you ever heard of the Holocaust JR? It seems to me there was a movie, or perhaps even two that were made about that event, yet there were over a hundred million victims of communism during the 20th century. Now, I can't remember the names of all those movies they made about the Holodomor (the genocide of white Christians by the millions by starvation). Didn't Steven Spielberg direct and Harvey Weinstein produce that big budget one?

    Have you ever heard about the black slavery that was once practiced in this country JR?

    I think they made a movie about it, if I'm not mistaken. But how many movies have they made about the genocidal treatment of innocent German civilians (who died by the millions after the second war was over). How many movies have they made about the monstrous and historical war crime of Dresden JR?

    Is it possible that our cultural institutions, and the media in particular- are in the hands of a people with a near monolithic contempt (hatred) for all things German? and consider their suffering and deaths by the millions to be of no consequence or concern? Just like the little white girl who is gang raped for days on end and then fed to alligators- when the sub-humans got done with her.

    Indeed, I suspect that right now, reading these words I'm typing, there is a very large percentage of people who're far more 0utraged at my characterization of these savage animals as "sub-humans" than they are at the incomprehensible suffering of that little girl, (and her loved ones). And that is all part of our carefully constructed programming. We're more sensitive to racial epitaphs than to a girl being fed to alligators.

    And all of that is to be expected. Because they don't do what they do for nothing JR. All of our memes and paradigms and narratives that make us all think and feel about events and the world around us are all part of our programming. None of us are born knowing the truth about the world and our place in it. We rely first on our parents and family to understand the world, and then on the media, the print and radio and television, (and only recently the Internet). So if the media, is (and I use the singular present tense verb 'is' deliberately) telling us that most all young, black teenage males are desperately trying to graduate and get their degrees so they can rise above all the racism that permeates our (irredeemably racist) society but then almost always while in their prime, and unarmed and walking around with their hands up and pleading not to get shot at least this one time- by yet another racist white [redundant] man with a gun, (often but not always with a badge too)- then this meme will take hold. It's guaranteed to, and that of course is the point.

    Now just for the record, there are racist white (and black and brown, etc..) men. And there are criminals and thugs and even murderers with guns and badges. But from what I've glimmered, most of America's cops, while being far too arrogant and thuggish, are nominally professionals. And if you, the reader, had to pick between your family's health and well being at the at the mercy of your typical urban young black men in America vs. the police, well then I can tell you that I know the streets, and I know Detroit and Miami, and there are places that they'd cut you to pieces as much as look at you. We get a very skewed version of reality from our msm, than exists in the real world, let me tell ya.

    And what follows is the obvious question why?

    Anyone with two peanuts rolling around in their noggins knows that Jews overwhelmingly own and control our msm. Duh. So the question becomes why do they treat white Americans with such overt hostility? Why are we (especially white, straight, southern, Christian men) always depicted as evil or pathetic- always deplorable? And irredeemable?

    (Perhaps not always, of course. But that is the meme. And we all know it).

    Is this hostility cultural, religious, or something more intractable?

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men - as congenital, if latent Nazis? Is that why they relentlessly foist non-white immigration on all white nations? Are they trying to protect themselves from a future potential holocaust by eliminating the threat in advance? What are the chances they might be creating the threat where none exists- with their 'cure'?

    Anyways, sorry for ruminating here on larger philosophical ramblings, but this article for me brings up important and extremely relevant questions.

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men – as congenital, if latent Nazis?

    jeezus krist on tortilla, Rurik.

    try to analyze Nazism for what it actually was, not what the very same “Jewish controlled media” has brainwashed you to believe it was.

    Unz essayed on the massive propaganda effort the British executed to involve USA in WWII (as also WWI, but that’s another story).

    Jews were equally involved in propagandizing USA to get Americans to acquiesce to WWII.
    Jews were deeply involved in psychological warfare against Germans for over five years post-war
    to substantiate both points, see Cora Sol Goldstein, “Capturing the German Eye.”

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.

    Every time you use the analogy, “zionism = Nazi;” or Jews = ‘latent Nazis,’ you’re fellating Bibi, deep and long, and he’s in pervert heaven.

    Hitler had the effrontery to resist “Jewish control of media,” and for that offense, Deutschland delenda est.

    Move beyond the brainwashing.

    Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from “Jewish control of media,” nonviolently — or to borrow Richard Breitman’s phrase, “semi-legally,” and in your cogitations, consider how the example of the destruction of Germany serves as a warning; and how the people of the USA are to avoid the same treatment.

    • Replies: @Rurik

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.
     
    Yes I know that SC

    we all know that

    but when I use the word 'Nazi', especially in this context, I'm not talking about the National Socialists who took Germany to such heights in the 30s until it all came crashing down in the 40s. No. What I'm talking about is the characterization of what the word has come to mean today, and especially to Jews in particular. You may believe that most of the things said about Nazis were and are war propaganda intended to justify burning the German cities and civilians by the hundreds of thousands if not millions. But I suspect that there are a lot of people who believe all that stuff; that Germans were and are congenitally evil and inclined to murder helpless and innocent Jews simply out of some innate and nefarious and irrational proclivity towards anti-Semitism. And if so, then perhaps that would help explain why the Jews of the world seem so keen on replacing Germans in Germany with a less threatening tribe, like radical Islamic Muslims for instance. And by extension, all potential "Nazis" in all white homelands the world over.

    And more to the point vis-a-vis the article, this hostility Jews have towards Germans in particular and white Christians in general, might just explain the one-sided raging double standard that Ron Unz is writing about when it comes to things like the dishonest media hysteria over the KKK vs. communism and the Orwellian reporting on racial crimes. No?

    Basically SC, I don't think that even if you and I and a thousand others tried day and night to resurrect the reputation of the Nazis (even if there were a sound moral reason for doing so - an endeavor of dubious merit IMHO) could it be done. It's a hopeless cause.

    Not that I don't agree that the Nazis, just like the Palestinians and the honorable Confederate soldiers or simply heterosexual, southern white Christians -(and of us assorted deplorables and irredeemables) have gotten and do get a raw deal by the Jewish press and monopolistic media domination.

    it seems to me that what we marinate in vis-a-vis the matrix of our "reality', is all basically a direct consequence of the collective id and psyches and fear and loathing of those who own and control the (monolithic) media. It really is that simple.

    the people writing here about Travon, one way or another, are only doing so because that whole narrative was inserted into our collective consciences deliberately by the masters of our media/reality.

    in many was it is like the wizard in the Wizard of Oz, in that they pull those levers and push those buttons and turn those nobs and out comes this huge illusion that we all treat as reality.

    Who ever it is behind that curtain and whatever their agenda, will determine what we all see and hear - and 'think'
    , @L.K
    Solonto wrote:

    jeezus krist on tortilla, Rurik.
    try to analyze Nazism for what it actually was, not what the very same “Jewish controlled media” has brainwashed you to believe it was.
     
    Hehe, I know right, I have tried myself a couple times with Rurik to make that exact point, and I think your post as a whole has done a much better job of it.

    But no go...

    Nevertheless, Rurik is one of the best posters here, a truth seeker, even when we disagree on this or that issue.


    Solonto:

    Hitler had the effrontery to resist “Jewish control of media,” and for that offense, Deutschland delenda est.
     
    And they suceeded, Germany is really dead, IMHO, its soul destroyed by all the atrocity propaganda, an occupied country, mentally and physically( think of all the fucking US bases & troops there).

    Solonto:

    Every time you use the analogy, “zionism = Nazi;” or Jews = ‘latent Nazis,’ you’re fellating Bibi, deep and long, and he’s in pervert heaven.
     
    Buahahaha, good one!
    , @Bill Jones
    Plus this little beauty from 1933 seems to have been memory-holed

    https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http:%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-xWGfRzA7VCw%2FVLFSSlqD8QI%2FAAAAAAAAUNI%2F3-3SzDzhzVU%2Fw1200-h630-p-nu%2FJews_declare_war_on_Germany.png&sp=4e1204e7b4b940b4440f81a7bb90c743

    "Jews declare war on Germany"
    , @Sam Shama
    [Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from “Jewish control of media,” nonviolently or to borrow Richard Breitman’s phrase, “semi-legally,”]

    Well wouldn't the straightforward route to that end be purchasing said media enterprises from Jewish hands? Organise a "Jewish Media Buyout Fund".

    Start with Ron Unz. I estimate opening bids at $25m.

    Semi-legal would be an LBO using Nazi Gold.

  68. @anonymous
    Most of these race legends fall apart when inspected closely. The woman in the Till case was apparently so agitated that she ran from her store, where the incident took place, to her vehicle to get the gun that was in it. Does that sound like only a 'wolf-whistle' was at issue? Her husband was later out looking for Till with the assistance of his friend JW Washington, a black man, which sort of takes the air out of the race angle.
    There's been a number of spinoffs from the cult ideology of the Zebra killers. Illinois had the De Mau Mau group who are known to have killed at least nine whites but who knows what the actual numbers are. Looking it up there's apparently a much larger number of these sorts of cases, some cult-like and others just crude hate killings. A person chronicling all of it would find it to be a full-time job.

    Presumably the brave perpetrators get their scores up by targetting the homeless and alcoholic poor. Not much grist for the young journalist on the make’s mill there.

  69. The theme of Klan versus Communist Party reminds me of a high school classmate back in the time when long hair was an issue between sons and parents. He told us that his father told him that his father didn’t care what he thought, as long as he had short hair. I thought to myself: what would your father say if he had told him, “Dad, I’ve joined the Klan,” or “Dad, I’ve joined the Communist Party.” Would his father still not cared what his son thought?

    Those were at the time the salient examples of organizational evil I could come up with. As the Civil Rights bill had been passed several years before, the Klan was in our awareness. Not only was the Communist Party in my awareness because of the Cold War, but I knew a fair number of Iron Curtain refugees and had taken an Introduction to Politics course which courtesy of reading Solzhenitsyn’s A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovitch, gave me a gut understanding of the evil of Communism.

    Years later I did a Google search on the classmate’s father and found out that his father had spent a decade as an operative- not a mere member- for the CPUSA. His father had left the Party soon after Krushchev’s 1956 speech denouncing Stalin. His father’s refusal to name names to the FBI resulted in a court case that made the papers, which he won on appeal.

    If the son had told his father he had joined the Communist Party, his father’s reaction would have been interesting, to say the least.

  70. @MQ
    Yes, I wondered why Ron didn't look up the easily available statistics on lynchings. About 3,400 of those lynchings were of black people -- a number far higher than the 15 murders he ascribes to the KKK. It doesn't justify some of the other reality distortions he mentions, but it gives a much better understanding of how violence was used to uphold the old Southern system.

    As well as Randal’s point is the point about the contrast in the Wikipedia write up that Ron was making.

  71. @dahoit
    Zimmerman was half Jewish right?
    He certainly doesn't strike me as having any righteous character,and with all the subsequent crap he's done, I wouldn't believe him an iota.

    I haven’t heard either about Zimmerman being “part Jewish” or the “subsequent crap” so would be pleased to read your elucidation.

    • Replies: @Alden
    His father is Jewish. It's a common German and Jewish last name Every Zimmerman I have ever known is a Jew, not a goy of German descent. Of course the few zimnermans I've known doesn't mean much but the family made it clear Dad is Jewish I don't know in what if any religion they raised the children

    If he had used his Mom's Spanish name no one except for his town in Florida would have ever heard of the incident

    Someone mentioned Zimmerman was stalking Martin. Actually, Martin was stalking him and there is a cell phone recording to his friend that "Ima gooh geh
    duh muh fughin cracka " English translation I'm going to get the mother f..king cracker.
  72. @utu
    "Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well." - This is too much to ask from race realists. Race realists and all the racists among them are serving designed for them purpose in the greater scheme of divide and rule played by the top caste.

    Race realists and all the racists among them are serving designed for them purpose in the greater scheme of divide and rule played by the top caste.

    while I agree that much of the BLM and media hysteria surrounding some non-racist crimes turned into racist crimes by the media (Travon) is intended to create hatred in the black community for white folks in general, and thereby foist a distraction from the real crimes of wars and monumental Wall Street swindles, etc…

    there does in my mind remain the quandary of ‘race realism’

    let’s put it this way…

    your seventeen year old daughter tells you she’s going out with some friends for the night, and might be back late

    when they drive up to pick up your daughter, you notice the fellows in the car are the men in the photos of this story.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3762863/Girl-17-went-missing-Myrtle-Beach-2009-gang-raped-shot-fed-alligators-says-FBI-agent.html

    They seem age appropriate, don’t get out of the car to come greet you but rather hang out with their hip-hop music thumping.. waiting for your daughter

    Now, what do you do as a father. Last weekend you let your daughter go out with some young white boys from her school and they brought her home safe after a fun evening. Now if you tell your daughter that you have reservations about her going with these fellows, guess what she’s going to say? She’s going to tremble, and perhaps begin shaking a little and her skin may flush and other subtle signs of intense agitation at the creeping moral horror and nauseating realization that OMG! – her very own dad is.. Oh God she can’t even say it. A racist !

    She’ll never look at you the same. She’ll whisper to her friends (since at least she’s still alive) that she never would have imagined that her own papa is a fucking racist

    Your reputation with her entire group of friends and their parents and the entire community will be destroyed, perhaps for ever.

    That for me is the kind of conundrum that must be happening all over the increasingly diverse Western world when it comes to hard race realism. Can you imagine an American father telling his seventeen year old daughter to perhaps have a little suspicion of young black men in hoodies and acting like thugs. It might cause a rift between you and your daughter that might never heal. But at least she’d be less likely to be gang raped for day on end and then fed to alligators.

    • Replies: @hhsiii
    Yes, the above article says it was in Florida, but it was in Myrtle Beach and McClellanville , SC where she was killed.
    , @gwynedd1
    If that father waited until 17 to tell her about how race works, its too late. At the individual level, and at the individual context, its statistical noise. At the group level it matters. White individuals around blacks are in a higher state of danger, relatively speaking. Circumstances may arise that blacks would be in danger around whites(prison for example). Latinos also may be at risk. This has nothing to do with individuals one may know. Hell even STI risk is much higher.

    More or less one does not need to make it a black thing . Does he have a dad? If he did, and he was raised in a middle class neighborhood , then he probably isn't really a statistical risk anyway. What's his GPA? There is a kid having issues in my kid's class, bullying and the like. He has a single mama, and no daddy around. A black guy with a dad and a good GPA is going to be better than a random white from the docks.
    , @utu
    Her father should recognize that it was most of all the class issue. He should not let her daughter go out with low class whites either.
  73. @Jus' Sayin'...
    I'm going to have to respond here because this comment illustrates only too well exactly the points that Mr. Unz is trying to make.

    First on Trayvon Williams: A lot of facts came out during the trial that NPR and other MSM outlets have chosen to ignore and bury: (1) Williams was obviously casing his new neighborhood for burglary opportunities when accosted by Zimmerman. On a rainy night he had been wandering for over 45 minutes through his new neighborhood when his path crossed Zimmerman's. A ten minute walk would have got him back to his house where his cousin was waiting for him. (2) Testimony of Williams's Haitian girlfriend established that Williams attacked Zimmerman based on the false belief that Zimmerman was a homosexual looking to hire Williams for a sexual tryst. (3) THe respected forensic pathologist, Vincent DeMaio, testified that ballistic and other evidence conclusivelt proved every aspect of Zimmerman's testimony; that Zimmerman was attacked by Williams; that Williams was sitting atop Zimmerman , leaning over him, and beating his head into the ground; that Zimmerman fired up into Williams at extremely close range in a last ditch effort to save his life.

    Second on the Zebra case: Mr. Unz left out a lot of the most damning information presented in the book he cites. The FBI was involved in the case early on. They actually established a connection between the murders and a prominent, and politically connected, member of the Nation of Islam based in Chicago. FBI agents, promised that the author would not reveal their names nor that of the Chicago suspects, told the author that a decision was made in Washington not to further pursue the case because of the racial tensions it might arouse. These agents were convinced that a large number of other Negro murderers could have been brought to justice, including some very high ranking members of the Nation of Islam cult had these leads been pursued.

    Pity you got his name wrong.

  74. I am just shaking and trembling at the moment because the Wikipedia page on the Zebra Killings leaves out so many of the details that Ron has unearthed.

  75. One of the best and most important articles I might have ever read. Mr. Unz is doing a lot for truth and diversity of opinions (these two subjects being different, btw).

    The subject of reality distortion by the media is extremely serious and even threatening, and the US is not the only country where it happens – nor is race/ethnicity the only subject concerned, although it might be the one where the distortion is most grotesque.

    An encouraging phenomenon: distrust of the lying press is way more widespread among the young. But not nearly enough. I have stopped reading a lot of media, thanks to a large extent to the opportunity that the Unz review has provided me to compare and judge alternative versions of reality – one made out of whole cloth, the other facts-based. Than you, Mr. Unz.

  76. “Yet oddly enough, only long afterward did it emerge out that his father, a violent criminal, had been executed for multiple rapes and murder(…)”

    Not true. It emerged shortly after the trial.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Does it affect Ron's case? The fact of suppression till after the trial suggests that, by the standards of the other common law countries, American criminal justice was on its best behaviour - or the media were.
  77. @Anon

    And Anonymous asks a pertinent question. “Why keep antagonizing blacks and why keep blaming white people?” Who benefits from identity politics Mr Unz? Race realists could, by extension, be class realists as well.
     
    Why did the British carry on divide-and-conquer policies among Indians?

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/09/07/has-israel-effectively-colonized-the-united-states/

    Thanks for the Counterpunch link. At least very clever. What a pity Rehmat isn’t in the same league.

  78. Ron – have you considered how far a mixture of fear and what may be thought of as prudence keeps the lid on reporting large scale black violence against whites? Apart from journalists not being interested in the lower classes and homeless who may suffer they might instinctively recoil from the idea of encouraging blacks to imagine getying away with killing lots of whites

  79. @Jason Bayz
    "Yet oddly enough, only long afterward did it emerge out that his father, a violent criminal, had been executed for multiple rapes and murder(...)"

    Not true. It emerged shortly after the trial.

    Does it affect Ron’s case? The fact of suppression till after the trial suggests that, by the standards of the other common law countries, American criminal justice was on its best behaviour – or the media were.

  80. @Gail
    Ron Unz disappoints me in this article, he's supposed to be so smart and rational but the level of irrationality displayed in some parts of this article is stunning and so disappointing. Let me just pick one example to dissect, here's an excerpt from the article:

    "There was enormous national media coverage of the Till murder, which uniformly reported that the black fourteen-year-old child had merely made rude and provocative remarks to the young wife of a white shopkeeper—a “Wolf whistle”—leading to his abduction and brutal killing. Yet oddly enough, only long afterward did it emerge out that his father, a violent criminal, had been executed for multiple rapes and murder, and that Till himself, weighing 150 pounds and quite large and muscular for his age, also had a violent history"

    So in the first part of the statement, Unz makes it sound like the media downplayed the severity of Till's offense towards the white lady, but then he gives no evidence of what the supposedly more serious offense was. He points out Till's father was a convicted murderer. Unz doesn't mention that his dad was put to death in 1945, when Emmett was 4 years old. Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him? And HOW is that relevant to Emmett Till's case?? Unz also points out Emmett was a large, scary 150 lb beast - lol, last time I checked, 150 lb is not big, I'm 180 lb and I wouldn't be considered scary by a long shot. Unz also points out he had a violent history, without providing details or explaining how any of that is relevant to his encounter with the white woman. Besides, if even all these things were true, it's still hard to argue that being lynched and murdered is a justifiable and understandable punishment for verbally harassing someone.

    Hello.

    You wrote: “Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him?”

    Emmett Till’s father would have had a huge influence on Emmett’s DNA, his genetics. Psychopathy is mostly a genetic thing, whereas Sociopathy is mostly an epigenetic thing (genetic mutations arising from environmental influences, such as: blows to the head, poor diet, frequent spankings or beatings, poverty, etc.). Both are classified as antisocial personality disorders (ASPD) and both can lead to extremely violent behavior…especially in males.

    Although we can’t, with any confidence, analyze Emmett Till’s case from where we are today, we can glean at least one small, but important, clue from the Unz article, and that is the reference to the “wolf whistle”. A wolf-whistle (I had to look it up) is when you stick your fingers in your mouth in order to amplify and project the whistling sound. Now, for a young black male to do that (which would almost certainly have been accompanied by sexually orientated proclamations of one kind or other) toward a white women, in that day and age, in Mississippi, I would say that there is a strong possibility of ASPD demonstrated in that.

    Hope this helps.

    • Replies: @Gail

    Although we can’t, with any confidence, analyze Emmett Till’s case from where we are today, we can glean at least one small, but important, clue from the Unz article, and that is the reference to the “wolf whistle”. A wolf-whistle (I had to look it up) is when you stick your fingers in your mouth in order to amplify and project the whistling sound. Now, for a young black male to do that (which would almost certainly have been accompanied by sexually orientated proclamations of one kind or other) toward a white women, in that day and age, in Mississippi, I would say that there is a strong possibility of ASPD demonstrated in that.
     
    I see. So let me summarize your line of reasoning, tell me if I'm missing something:

    Wolf-whistling at white woman + Psychopath Father + Possible inheritance of father's ASPD = Grounds for Execution ?
  81. @SolontoCroesus

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men – as congenital, if latent Nazis?
     
    jeezus krist on tortilla, Rurik.

    try to analyze Nazism for what it actually was, not what the very same "Jewish controlled media" has brainwashed you to believe it was.

    Unz essayed on the massive propaganda effort the British executed to involve USA in WWII (as also WWI, but that's another story).

    Jews were equally involved in propagandizing USA to get Americans to acquiesce to WWII.
    Jews were deeply involved in psychological warfare against Germans for over five years post-war
    to substantiate both points, see Cora Sol Goldstein, "Capturing the German Eye."

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.

    Every time you use the analogy, "zionism = Nazi;" or Jews = 'latent Nazis,' you're fellating Bibi, deep and long, and he's in pervert heaven.

    Hitler had the effrontery to resist "Jewish control of media," and for that offense, Deutschland delenda est.

    Move beyond the brainwashing.

    Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from "Jewish control of media," nonviolently -- or to borrow Richard Breitman's phrase, "semi-legally," and in your cogitations, consider how the example of the destruction of Germany serves as a warning; and how the people of the USA are to avoid the same treatment.

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.

    Yes I know that SC

    we all know that

    but when I use the word ‘Nazi’, especially in this context, I’m not talking about the National Socialists who took Germany to such heights in the 30s until it all came crashing down in the 40s. No. What I’m talking about is the characterization of what the word has come to mean today, and especially to Jews in particular. You may believe that most of the things said about Nazis were and are war propaganda intended to justify burning the German cities and civilians by the hundreds of thousands if not millions. But I suspect that there are a lot of people who believe all that stuff; that Germans were and are congenitally evil and inclined to murder helpless and innocent Jews simply out of some innate and nefarious and irrational proclivity towards anti-Semitism. And if so, then perhaps that would help explain why the Jews of the world seem so keen on replacing Germans in Germany with a less threatening tribe, like radical Islamic Muslims for instance. And by extension, all potential “Nazis” in all white homelands the world over.

    And more to the point vis-a-vis the article, this hostility Jews have towards Germans in particular and white Christians in general, might just explain the one-sided raging double standard that Ron Unz is writing about when it comes to things like the dishonest media hysteria over the KKK vs. communism and the Orwellian reporting on racial crimes. No?

    Basically SC, I don’t think that even if you and I and a thousand others tried day and night to resurrect the reputation of the Nazis (even if there were a sound moral reason for doing so – an endeavor of dubious merit IMHO) could it be done. It’s a hopeless cause.

    Not that I don’t agree that the Nazis, just like the Palestinians and the honorable Confederate soldiers or simply heterosexual, southern white Christians -(and of us assorted deplorables and irredeemables) have gotten and do get a raw deal by the Jewish press and monopolistic media domination.

    it seems to me that what we marinate in vis-a-vis the matrix of our “reality’, is all basically a direct consequence of the collective id and psyches and fear and loathing of those who own and control the (monolithic) media. It really is that simple.

    the people writing here about Travon, one way or another, are only doing so because that whole narrative was inserted into our collective consciences deliberately by the masters of our media/reality.

    in many was it is like the wizard in the Wizard of Oz, in that they pull those levers and push those buttons and turn those nobs and out comes this huge illusion that we all treat as reality.

    Who ever it is behind that curtain and whatever their agenda, will determine what we all see and hear – and ‘think’

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus

    Who ever it is behind that curtain and whatever their agenda, will determine what we all see and hear – and ‘think’
     
    Rurik, you are breaking my heart.

    No no no.
    Whoever is behind the curtain does NOT determine what I think.

    I will be judged on my actions -- whether I get to collect 72 virgins or 72 STD polluted skanks (Samantha Power X 72? Is that not a definition of hell?)

    That being the case, I am responsible for what I think.

    Your squishy approach to the topic is disappointing.

    Nobody is out to whitewash Nazis. Rather, it is imperative that the entire story be presented: it's impossible to make accurate policy decisions if the historical data is distorted =- as we see playing out in Iraq etc.
    With so many lives already lost or ruined, and so many more on the line, I think it's vitally, as in "a matter of life and death" -- that we get the story straight.

    The story pushed by "Jewish controlled media" has not been straight since at least 1881.

    Believe it or not I've been told that the task of undoing that false narrative is a near impossibility.

    That may be so.
    What is the alternative? To allow the status quo to persist? That's the posture of a coward.

    What other nations will we wipe out based on obeisance to the sacred lie of the holocaust? How many more people have to die before we summon the courage to say, STOP! You are lying; We will not tolerate this for one more minute.

    imho you are misquided in your squishy 'yes, I know but that's not what I meant and anyway it's so hard and everybody thinks that and I don't want to ruffle feathers so I just go along.'

    You do realize, don't you, that by recklessly using Nazi terminology you are effectively chopping off the second-largest segment of White Americans, namely Germans, who are, incidentally, among the smartest and most productive members of White American society.
  82. @Anonymous
    A really well-paced, sequential argument.

    That’s what struck me also on this well-balanced, entirely rational piece by Ron. The Martin-Zimmerman case illustrates another of his points: the massive bias of the media, nationally and internationally (the Guardian). For quite a while, the photo of Martin that was spread about was of a smiling 12-year-old schoolboy. Only later were we able to see what a hulking thug he was when he confronted Zimmerman.

  83. This may be the most important article Mr. Unz has yet to write. As bad as the 20th century KKK was at times, it was nothing compared to at least a dozen different black groups. Our lying media, back even before the 1960s, back to at least the 1850s, has portrayed blacks as the race dusky angelic victims and non-genteel whites as the group of evil oppressors casually slaughtering innocence. Long before the Bolshevik Revolution, the American press was creating disrupting lies about race and violent crime that were as divorced from facts as anything the Stalinists ever imagined.

  84. Today, it is not important how we feel about afro americans. Most of us would just go about our own business & daily lives, and not even think about them. If black racial obsessions were not constantly forced upon us by the MSM (They are less than 20% population, and are more than 80% of the media content), and whites were not victims of afro american violence, we would not have an adverse thought about them.

    Our negative thoughts are the result of negative experiences, not the other way around. Further, we are not responsible for what people did in the past, we are responsible for ourselves & our own actions. The whole concept of collective guilt is nothing but a leftist perpetuated fraud in order to manipulate us, through guilt, to accept the unacceptable (radical afro american behavior).

    It is the way they feel about us that is the actual problem, which is fanatical self initiated hatred towards whites, without any provocation from the whites themselves. The leftist solution is more pandering, praise, and entitlements, that constantly yields negative results. Yet we are told that not enough is being done, and by continuing to repeat a failed ideology, it will eventually produce a successful result. And there is no foreseeable end to this angry afro rhetoric because the leftist and radical afro americans do not believe that there is anything wrong with it.

    So any expectation that this current trend line will all somehow end peacefully, I am afraid, is just a lot of wishful thinking. This is because nothing is being done to alter/correct the current trend line, and is instead being naively encouraged & promoted by the leftist enablers.
    Racial Balkanization plus economic decline equals social instability. I wish it was a different story, but it is not; and that is the reality of our current situation regarding race relations.

  85. Excellent article. The MSM continues to play the ‘white racism’ card by amplifying the connection between white identity (and white security interests) to wanton, race-driven murder/mayhem committed by whites. The threat of black criminality and black degeneracy is inevitably downplayed or ignored.

    These dual campaigns delegitimize white identity and undermine white community.

    White Americans have been divided up and separated from one another via ideology and media-imposed guilt. The modern taboos against ‘white racism’ (the natural inclination among whites to form homogeneous communities) is a politically-correct Trojan horse. It poisons white community and white political solidarity.

    Meanwhile, the media speaks approvingly of ‘the black vote’, the ‘Jewish vote’, and the ‘Hispanic vote’. But there’s no such thing (in TV-land) as the ‘white vote’–only white racism.

    White Americans are not permitted to have racial identities or racial agendas which translate into political action. What caused this to happen?

    Whites may identify as ‘liberals’, ‘conservatives’, Democrats or Republicans. These ideological boundaries keep us squabbling among ourselves and it renders us ill-equipped to resist the ongoing multi-cult juggernaut that is transforming our culture. Similar taboos make us powerless in resisting Zionist-driven wars and hegemony.

    White Americans have become observers and political non-participants. This is due in part to the fact that whites are not allowed to possess or to proclaim collective interests as a distinct people.

    We are however expected to welcome the media-driven campaign that celebrates miscegenation and unsought multiculturalism. The collective interests of European-derived peoples in America remains unaddressed. In fact it is reviled as ‘racism’.

    Meanwhile, blacks, Hispanics and Jews are permitted–encouraged even–to coalesce strictly along racial/ethnic lines. This freedom to unite energizes them and empowers them beyond their numbers.

    The media’s campaign against ‘white racism’ also dovetails with the media’s never-ending campaign against ‘anti-Semitism’. They’re two sides of the same duplicitous coin.

  86. @Rurik

    Race realists and all the racists among them are serving designed for them purpose in the greater scheme of divide and rule played by the top caste.
     
    while I agree that much of the BLM and media hysteria surrounding some non-racist crimes turned into racist crimes by the media (Travon) is intended to create hatred in the black community for white folks in general, and thereby foist a distraction from the real crimes of wars and monumental Wall Street swindles, etc...

    there does in my mind remain the quandary of 'race realism'

    let's put it this way...

    your seventeen year old daughter tells you she's going out with some friends for the night, and might be back late

    when they drive up to pick up your daughter, you notice the fellows in the car are the men in the photos of this story.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3762863/Girl-17-went-missing-Myrtle-Beach-2009-gang-raped-shot-fed-alligators-says-FBI-agent.html

    They seem age appropriate, don't get out of the car to come greet you but rather hang out with their hip-hop music thumping.. waiting for your daughter

    Now, what do you do as a father. Last weekend you let your daughter go out with some young white boys from her school and they brought her home safe after a fun evening. Now if you tell your daughter that you have reservations about her going with these fellows, guess what she's going to say? She's going to tremble, and perhaps begin shaking a little and her skin may flush and other subtle signs of intense agitation at the creeping moral horror and nauseating realization that OMG! - her very own dad is.. Oh God she can't even say it. A racist !

    She'll never look at you the same. She'll whisper to her friends (since at least she's still alive) that she never would have imagined that her own papa is a fucking racist

    Your reputation with her entire group of friends and their parents and the entire community will be destroyed, perhaps for ever.

    That for me is the kind of conundrum that must be happening all over the increasingly diverse Western world when it comes to hard race realism. Can you imagine an American father telling his seventeen year old daughter to perhaps have a little suspicion of young black men in hoodies and acting like thugs. It might cause a rift between you and your daughter that might never heal. But at least she'd be less likely to be gang raped for day on end and then fed to alligators.

    Yes, the above article says it was in Florida, but it was in Myrtle Beach and McClellanville , SC where she was killed.

    • Replies: @David In TN
    "Yes, the above article says it was in Florida, but it was in Myrtle Beach and McClellanville. SC where she was killed."

    Her name was Britanee Drexel.
  87. In fact, the evidence suggests that the overwhelming majority of all racially-motivated violent attacks in America each year are committed by blacks

    This claim isn’t supported by your source, which is a Thomas Sowell article that doesn’t delve into the statistics at all.

    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014

    In 2014, race was reported for 5,192 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:

    52.0 percent were White.

    23.2 percent were Black or African American.

    in 2014, there were 3,227 victims of racially motivated hate crime.

    62.7 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Black or African American bias.

    22.7 percent were victims of anti-White bias.

    Now, this data isn’t perfect. Certainly not all racially motivated attacks will be labelled as hate crimes. But there is no evidence here that blacks commit more racially motivated attacks, let alone the “overwhelming majority” of them.

    • Replies: @Randal
    Those FBI figures are utterly useless. First, undoubtedly black victims of racist abuse are far more likely to report it than white, and general abuse is far more likely to be classified as racist if it is by a white person against a black person, for the obvious reason that racism is an obsession of blacks and of anti-white whites, not of whites in general, and also because most whites simply would not expect a report of racist abuse against them to be taken seriously.

    Second, note that Unz referred specifically to "violent" attacks, which I would interpret to mean aggravated assaults, or worse, against the person, not what the FBI classifies as "intimidation" (in this context, giving verbal offence to a member of one of the specially protected groups), simple assault (not included in the FBI's classification of violent crimes, which are: Murder, Forcible Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Assault), or property crimes. These categories account for the vast majority of the FBI's "hate crimes" (77%).

    It will be interesting to see whether Unz will substantiate this point and provide his reasoning and evidence, but it seems reasonable on its face that the majority of violent race hatred crimes would be committed by blacks against whites because blacks are per capita far more criminally violent (as the statistics prove) in general, and many if not most blacks are also obviously obsessed with race issues and chock full of race resentment, stoked by our media and their own race-baiting identity lobbyist politicians. Whether that is sufficiently the case to overcome the fact that they represent only 12% or so of the US population is all you need reliable figures for. In the absence of such figures, it seems a reasonable presumption that it is.
    , @Wanderer
    Conveniently for Doris, the data only goes up to 2014.

    Now, what happened in 2015 and 2016 that might affect the data?
    , @John Jeremiah Smith

    This claim isn’t supported by your source, which is a Thomas Sowell article that doesn’t delve into the statistics at all.

    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014
     
    LOL. Oh, excuuuuuuse me. The 'hate-crime stats', you say? Har, har, har, har, har. You mean the small number of crimes that are defined as "hate crimes" by law-enforcement under media pressure?

    Just look up the plain-vanilla violent crime stats, pal. Blacks commit violent crime at a rate TEN TIMES HIGHER than that of whites. And that's using stats padded with Mexicans as "white".
    , @ben tillman

    Now, this data isn’t perfect. Certainly not all racially motivated attacks will be labelled as hate crimes. But there is no evidence here that blacks commit more racially motivated attacks, let alone the “overwhelming majority” of them.
     
    People who live in the real world know that 95% of hate crimes fall into one of two categories:

    (1) Blacks attacking whites or, less often, other non-blacks; and

    (2) Non-queers attacking queers or people perceived to be queer.
    , @KenH
    These data confirms that by blacks committing 23.2% of hate crimes they are doing so at almost twice their rate in the generate population, whereas whites at 62.0% of the population are committing hate crimes at a lower rate of 52.0%. However, mestizos/latinos offenders are often lumped in with whites and if we make reasonable assumption that they are committing hate crimes at equal their percentage of the general population (16%) than the white figure decreases to 36.0%.

    In 2014, blacks committed 561,000 violent crimes against whites while whites only committed 99,000 violent crimes against blacks. Adjusted for percentages this means blacks are 25 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites than the reverse. Blacks choose white victims almost as much as black victims and if the FBI were honest they would consider some of these hate crimes since blacks are clearly targeting whites based on their race.

    http://www.amren.com/news/2015/07/new-doj-statistics-on-race-and-violent-crime/

    , @Hippopotamusdrome


    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014

     

    LOL FBI hate-crime stastistics.

    On one hand a white guy spray painting ‘no more Chinese’ counts as 1 hate crime. On the other hand a gang of blacks beating up two whites while yelling “Get those crackers!” and “Get that white whore!” isn't charged as a hate crime and not counted on the stastistics.

    P.S. Where is the Hispanic category in the stats?

    White graffiti is a hate-crime:

    Vandalism, hate-crime charges in ‘no more Chinese’ graffiti case

    Alleged Northwestern chapel vandals indicted on a dozen hate crime charges

    Teen Faces Possible Hate Crime Charges After Winthrop School Vandalism

    Former NYPD officer charged with hate crimes in anti-Semitic vandalism

    Hate crimes charges laid in graffiti case

    1 graffiti suspect to be charged with hate crimes, Madison police say

    Texas Students Write ‘Whites Only,’ Face Hate Crime Charges After Senior Prank At James Martin High School In Arlington

    Two Mizzou students arrested for cotton ball hate crime

    Black racist attacks are not a hate-crime:


    Hate crime charges dropped against black teens accused of beating white Brooklyn couple
    ... the suspects allegedly yelling “Get those crackers!” and “Get that white whore!”

     



    Bias Ruled Out in the Death of NYU Student
    The death of a white New York University student who was struck by a car in East Harlem last week while allegedly fleeing a group of black would-be muggers crying "get the white boy" was not a hate crime, police said yesterday.

     


    No Hate Crime Charges for 8 Black Youths Accused in Brutal Beating of White Teen…


    Police claim mother of two who was attacked by 'dozens of black youths' with her young children in car and told she didn't belong in neighborhood because she was white was NOT a victim of a hate crime

    Three black soldiers arrested for stabbing white comrade to death 'called him a cracker' - so why are police now so sure it was NOT a hate crime?

    No Hate Crime Charges For Black Woman Who Attacked White Man Saying She ‘Kills Crackers All The Time’
  88. Looking at some other sources, some are claiming that 4000 blacks were lynched in the US. These numbers don’t include Reconstruction, so lets say that 5000 blacks were killed during Reconstruction by Southerners trying to rid their states of the Carpetbagger/Black governments.

    That gives us 9000 blacks “murdered” in 100 years, we will pretend they were all killed by the KKK. Obama has been president for 8 years. The blacks murdered by blacks each year is roughly 2300. So under the Obama Regime, blacks have killed double the number (18,400) of blacks than were murdered in 100 years of Klan activity.

  89. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    That’s some solid speculation you have there. And yes , its an oxymoron.

    Zimmerman may have escalated it at a particular stage , but Martin escalated it from that point based on the evidence. So unless Zimmerman is a master manipulator, even faking his own injuries , you’d have to be pretty tool worthy not to see the escalation continues until Martian got more than he could handle.

    Even so we don’t really know, and that’s the problem. What we do know however is the media used old baby pictures to create a narrative that a 12 year old child was looking for candy as a substitute for a near adult adolescent, 17 year old looking to make a drug cocktail.

    • Replies: @joef
    Agreed. It is improbable that Trayvon caused Zimmerman's injuries after Trayvon was fatally shot. Thus Zim reacted to deadly force that was being used against him. Even if Zim was the initial primary aggressor, that does not negate his right to defend himself against the escalation to deadly force by Trayvon. The right to self defense, & to preserve one's life, is an absolute right, which is so self evident, the Founding Fathers probably did not see a need to include it in the Bill of Rights. Only a reality challenged liberal would not agree. That is why if it were not for modern protections, liberals would die off from natural selection (the denial of reality is not a skill for survival).
  90. @SolontoCroesus

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men – as congenital, if latent Nazis?
     
    jeezus krist on tortilla, Rurik.

    try to analyze Nazism for what it actually was, not what the very same "Jewish controlled media" has brainwashed you to believe it was.

    Unz essayed on the massive propaganda effort the British executed to involve USA in WWII (as also WWI, but that's another story).

    Jews were equally involved in propagandizing USA to get Americans to acquiesce to WWII.
    Jews were deeply involved in psychological warfare against Germans for over five years post-war
    to substantiate both points, see Cora Sol Goldstein, "Capturing the German Eye."

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.

    Every time you use the analogy, "zionism = Nazi;" or Jews = 'latent Nazis,' you're fellating Bibi, deep and long, and he's in pervert heaven.

    Hitler had the effrontery to resist "Jewish control of media," and for that offense, Deutschland delenda est.

    Move beyond the brainwashing.

    Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from "Jewish control of media," nonviolently -- or to borrow Richard Breitman's phrase, "semi-legally," and in your cogitations, consider how the example of the destruction of Germany serves as a warning; and how the people of the USA are to avoid the same treatment.

    Solonto wrote:

    jeezus krist on tortilla, Rurik.
    try to analyze Nazism for what it actually was, not what the very same “Jewish controlled media” has brainwashed you to believe it was.

    Hehe, I know right, I have tried myself a couple times with Rurik to make that exact point, and I think your post as a whole has done a much better job of it.

    But no go…

    Nevertheless, Rurik is one of the best posters here, a truth seeker, even when we disagree on this or that issue.

    Solonto:

    Hitler had the effrontery to resist “Jewish control of media,” and for that offense, Deutschland delenda est.

    And they suceeded, Germany is really dead, IMHO, its soul destroyed by all the atrocity propaganda, an occupied country, mentally and physically( think of all the fucking US bases & troops there).

    Solonto:

    Every time you use the analogy, “zionism = Nazi;” or Jews = ‘latent Nazis,’ you’re fellating Bibi, deep and long, and he’s in pervert heaven.

    Buahahaha, good one!

  91. @Hepp
    Wonderful article.

    We hear of young black men and their complaints about being stereotyped as violent. But that's like complaining about the stereotype that the sky is blue or that water is wet. If any man said "I'm sad because I get stereotyped as more violent than a woman" people would laugh at him, and rightly so. Black men, as a group, rob, rape, and kill in astronomical numbers. Instead of worrying about this fact and trying to do something about it, the media focuses on the natural and inevitable consequence that people will develop stereotypes about this fact.

    Liberals' belief in racial equality is so absurd and so contradicted by reason that, like communist economics, it requires nonstop censorship and propaganda for anyone to believe it.

    A stereotype is based on reality.

  92. @Rurik

    Race realists and all the racists among them are serving designed for them purpose in the greater scheme of divide and rule played by the top caste.
     
    while I agree that much of the BLM and media hysteria surrounding some non-racist crimes turned into racist crimes by the media (Travon) is intended to create hatred in the black community for white folks in general, and thereby foist a distraction from the real crimes of wars and monumental Wall Street swindles, etc...

    there does in my mind remain the quandary of 'race realism'

    let's put it this way...

    your seventeen year old daughter tells you she's going out with some friends for the night, and might be back late

    when they drive up to pick up your daughter, you notice the fellows in the car are the men in the photos of this story.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3762863/Girl-17-went-missing-Myrtle-Beach-2009-gang-raped-shot-fed-alligators-says-FBI-agent.html

    They seem age appropriate, don't get out of the car to come greet you but rather hang out with their hip-hop music thumping.. waiting for your daughter

    Now, what do you do as a father. Last weekend you let your daughter go out with some young white boys from her school and they brought her home safe after a fun evening. Now if you tell your daughter that you have reservations about her going with these fellows, guess what she's going to say? She's going to tremble, and perhaps begin shaking a little and her skin may flush and other subtle signs of intense agitation at the creeping moral horror and nauseating realization that OMG! - her very own dad is.. Oh God she can't even say it. A racist !

    She'll never look at you the same. She'll whisper to her friends (since at least she's still alive) that she never would have imagined that her own papa is a fucking racist

    Your reputation with her entire group of friends and their parents and the entire community will be destroyed, perhaps for ever.

    That for me is the kind of conundrum that must be happening all over the increasingly diverse Western world when it comes to hard race realism. Can you imagine an American father telling his seventeen year old daughter to perhaps have a little suspicion of young black men in hoodies and acting like thugs. It might cause a rift between you and your daughter that might never heal. But at least she'd be less likely to be gang raped for day on end and then fed to alligators.

    If that father waited until 17 to tell her about how race works, its too late. At the individual level, and at the individual context, its statistical noise. At the group level it matters. White individuals around blacks are in a higher state of danger, relatively speaking. Circumstances may arise that blacks would be in danger around whites(prison for example). Latinos also may be at risk. This has nothing to do with individuals one may know. Hell even STI risk is much higher.

    More or less one does not need to make it a black thing . Does he have a dad? If he did, and he was raised in a middle class neighborhood , then he probably isn’t really a statistical risk anyway. What’s his GPA? There is a kid having issues in my kid’s class, bullying and the like. He has a single mama, and no daddy around. A black guy with a dad and a good GPA is going to be better than a random white from the docks.

    • Replies: @Rurik

    A black guy with a dad and a good GPA is going to be better than a random white from the docks.
     
    well, I'd certainly prefer my daughter date a young Ben Carson over a young Charles Manson, but all things being what they are, if I saw those two young men in the photos coming to get my daughter, I suspect there'd be lead in the air before she'd be driving off with those two.

    The reason blacks present a greater threat to specifically white folks is because of their bile-dripping thug-life culture + having marinated in a toxic stew of media spun lies about all the terrible things white people have and are doing to them to keep them down. It (deliberately) creates hatred, and that hatred often expresses itself in horrible ways. And then, there's an argument for wondering if blacks are just more violent and primitive than whites in general. Actually I think that may be one of their charms to the ladies. No girl wants a pasty, namby-pamby do-gooder. But then again all too often gals dance with the devil and get burned.

    But anyways, yea, a decent black (or brown or yellow or whatever) fella is always going to be better than a white scumbag. But a father always should want the best for his little princesses, no?
  93. @Jus' Sayin'...
    I'm going to have to respond here because this comment illustrates only too well exactly the points that Mr. Unz is trying to make.

    First on Trayvon Williams: A lot of facts came out during the trial that NPR and other MSM outlets have chosen to ignore and bury: (1) Williams was obviously casing his new neighborhood for burglary opportunities when accosted by Zimmerman. On a rainy night he had been wandering for over 45 minutes through his new neighborhood when his path crossed Zimmerman's. A ten minute walk would have got him back to his house where his cousin was waiting for him. (2) Testimony of Williams's Haitian girlfriend established that Williams attacked Zimmerman based on the false belief that Zimmerman was a homosexual looking to hire Williams for a sexual tryst. (3) THe respected forensic pathologist, Vincent DeMaio, testified that ballistic and other evidence conclusivelt proved every aspect of Zimmerman's testimony; that Zimmerman was attacked by Williams; that Williams was sitting atop Zimmerman , leaning over him, and beating his head into the ground; that Zimmerman fired up into Williams at extremely close range in a last ditch effort to save his life.

    Second on the Zebra case: Mr. Unz left out a lot of the most damning information presented in the book he cites. The FBI was involved in the case early on. They actually established a connection between the murders and a prominent, and politically connected, member of the Nation of Islam based in Chicago. FBI agents, promised that the author would not reveal their names nor that of the Chicago suspects, told the author that a decision was made in Washington not to further pursue the case because of the racial tensions it might arouse. These agents were convinced that a large number of other Negro murderers could have been brought to justice, including some very high ranking members of the Nation of Islam cult had these leads been pursued.

    “Mr. Unz left out a lot of the most damning information presented in the book he cites.”

    Absolutely. The so-called Zebra case was far worse than most people who have heard of it know. In October 1973, there was a meeting of California law enforcement officials in which it was determined over 70 white people had been killed in California in the last 2 years or so by Nation of Islam members. This was before the San Francisco “Zebra murders” had begun.

    Thomas Peele’s recent book, “Killing the Messenger,” about the murder of black journalist Chauncey Bailey, has a chapter on the Zebra murders. Peele tells of the “East Bay killings” taking place at the same time, which were run out a mosque in Oakland. It is believed there were 30 white victims in the East Bay, none were solved. Peele indicates the mosques in San Francisco and Oakland were in league with each other.

    There were killings in Sacramento in 1974. In this one, two NOI members were convicted. Both were paroled a few years ago after admitting their guilt and expressing remorse. One said higher-ups in the NOI had held meetings instructing them to kill white people.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky

    One said higher-ups in the NOI had held meetings instructing them to kill white people.
     
    It's a very strange narrative. Did they allege a motive for this?
  94. @gwynedd1
    That's some solid speculation you have there. And yes , its an oxymoron.

    Zimmerman may have escalated it at a particular stage , but Martin escalated it from that point based on the evidence. So unless Zimmerman is a master manipulator, even faking his own injuries , you'd have to be pretty tool worthy not to see the escalation continues until Martian got more than he could handle.

    Even so we don't really know, and that's the problem. What we do know however is the media used old baby pictures to create a narrative that a 12 year old child was looking for candy as a substitute for a near adult adolescent, 17 year old looking to make a drug cocktail.

    Agreed. It is improbable that Trayvon caused Zimmerman’s injuries after Trayvon was fatally shot. Thus Zim reacted to deadly force that was being used against him. Even if Zim was the initial primary aggressor, that does not negate his right to defend himself against the escalation to deadly force by Trayvon. The right to self defense, & to preserve one’s life, is an absolute right, which is so self evident, the Founding Fathers probably did not see a need to include it in the Bill of Rights. Only a reality challenged liberal would not agree. That is why if it were not for modern protections, liberals would die off from natural selection (the denial of reality is not a skill for survival).

  95. @Rurik

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.
     
    Yes I know that SC

    we all know that

    but when I use the word 'Nazi', especially in this context, I'm not talking about the National Socialists who took Germany to such heights in the 30s until it all came crashing down in the 40s. No. What I'm talking about is the characterization of what the word has come to mean today, and especially to Jews in particular. You may believe that most of the things said about Nazis were and are war propaganda intended to justify burning the German cities and civilians by the hundreds of thousands if not millions. But I suspect that there are a lot of people who believe all that stuff; that Germans were and are congenitally evil and inclined to murder helpless and innocent Jews simply out of some innate and nefarious and irrational proclivity towards anti-Semitism. And if so, then perhaps that would help explain why the Jews of the world seem so keen on replacing Germans in Germany with a less threatening tribe, like radical Islamic Muslims for instance. And by extension, all potential "Nazis" in all white homelands the world over.

    And more to the point vis-a-vis the article, this hostility Jews have towards Germans in particular and white Christians in general, might just explain the one-sided raging double standard that Ron Unz is writing about when it comes to things like the dishonest media hysteria over the KKK vs. communism and the Orwellian reporting on racial crimes. No?

    Basically SC, I don't think that even if you and I and a thousand others tried day and night to resurrect the reputation of the Nazis (even if there were a sound moral reason for doing so - an endeavor of dubious merit IMHO) could it be done. It's a hopeless cause.

    Not that I don't agree that the Nazis, just like the Palestinians and the honorable Confederate soldiers or simply heterosexual, southern white Christians -(and of us assorted deplorables and irredeemables) have gotten and do get a raw deal by the Jewish press and monopolistic media domination.

    it seems to me that what we marinate in vis-a-vis the matrix of our "reality', is all basically a direct consequence of the collective id and psyches and fear and loathing of those who own and control the (monolithic) media. It really is that simple.

    the people writing here about Travon, one way or another, are only doing so because that whole narrative was inserted into our collective consciences deliberately by the masters of our media/reality.

    in many was it is like the wizard in the Wizard of Oz, in that they pull those levers and push those buttons and turn those nobs and out comes this huge illusion that we all treat as reality.

    Who ever it is behind that curtain and whatever their agenda, will determine what we all see and hear - and 'think'

    Who ever it is behind that curtain and whatever their agenda, will determine what we all see and hear – and ‘think’

    Rurik, you are breaking my heart.

    No no no.
    Whoever is behind the curtain does NOT determine what I think.

    I will be judged on my actions — whether I get to collect 72 virgins or 72 STD polluted skanks (Samantha Power X 72? Is that not a definition of hell?)

    That being the case, I am responsible for what I think.

    Your squishy approach to the topic is disappointing.

    Nobody is out to whitewash Nazis. Rather, it is imperative that the entire story be presented: it’s impossible to make accurate policy decisions if the historical data is distorted =- as we see playing out in Iraq etc.
    With so many lives already lost or ruined, and so many more on the line, I think it’s vitally, as in “a matter of life and death” — that we get the story straight.

    The story pushed by “Jewish controlled media” has not been straight since at least 1881.

    Believe it or not I’ve been told that the task of undoing that false narrative is a near impossibility.

    That may be so.
    What is the alternative? To allow the status quo to persist? That’s the posture of a coward.

    What other nations will we wipe out based on obeisance to the sacred lie of the holocaust? How many more people have to die before we summon the courage to say, STOP! You are lying; We will not tolerate this for one more minute.

    imho you are misquided in your squishy ‘yes, I know but that’s not what I meant and anyway it’s so hard and everybody thinks that and I don’t want to ruffle feathers so I just go along.

    You do realize, don’t you, that by recklessly using Nazi terminology you are effectively chopping off the second-largest segment of White Americans, namely Germans, who are, incidentally, among the smartest and most productive members of White American society.

    • Replies: @Rurik

    Whoever is behind the curtain does NOT determine what I think.

    ...

    ...I am responsible for what I think.
     
    I was referring to the sheeple. The narrative, if you will. It is what it is.

    if you poll ten thousand Americans randomly and ask them, 'were the Nazis racists who considered themselves superior to others? ; 9,999 of those people would say yes. (myself included)

    What is the alternative? To allow the status quo to persist? That’s the posture of a coward.
     
    I believe there are very few people who are more tenacious as I in pointing out the lies told about Nazi Germany. But I'll only go so far. From everything I know about them, their uber fascism and so forth, they would have killed a guy like be for being unwilling to shut off my brain and blindly support the Fuhrer in all things. I'd prefer to imagine myself in the mold of Rommel, who Hitler forced to commit suicide for Rommel's unwillingness to give his support to the disastrous Nazi regime. No to Nazis, yes to truth!

    What other nations will we wipe out based on obeisance to the sacred lie of the holocaust?
     
    have to go

    suffice to say I consider the immediate 'big lie' being 911 today. And it's that lie that is responsible for the wars today.
  96. @Rurik
    OK JR,

    Since we're usually in agreement, I'll bounce my thoughts on this into the blogosphere..

    This is a brave and powerful article by Mr. Unz. It touches on a verboten subject and eviscerates and holds high the dripping entrails of the Orwellian mendacity enshrouding the length and breath of our entire society, from top to bottom. - That there is a knee-jerk hostility to Western (white) culture and people emanating out of all of our cultural institutions (and especially Hollywood) is so plainly obvious to anyone with eyes and ears that we all just take it for granted.

    That the rape and murder (and horrific treatment) of that teenage white girl wasn't reported in the news isn't going to raise eyebrows anywhere. We all know that's how it works. It's a one way street. If a black person is a victim, (or even if they aren't, as in the case of the Duke "rapists", or Travon, or Michael Brown, etcetera ad nauseam.. ) the media will shriek hysterically for days on end, until the whole world! (literally) knows about the Duke "rapists" or the numinous Travon, with his picture at 12 years old. Obama's son.

    But if it's a white victim, like the young people who died during the Wichita massacre, or Channon Christian and her boyfriend, then no one will have ever heard of them outside the local news.

    It goes like this with every crime and even historical events. Everything is filtered through the sieve of political correctness.

    Have you ever heard of the Holocaust JR? It seems to me there was a movie, or perhaps even two that were made about that event, yet there were over a hundred million victims of communism during the 20th century. Now, I can't remember the names of all those movies they made about the Holodomor (the genocide of white Christians by the millions by starvation). Didn't Steven Spielberg direct and Harvey Weinstein produce that big budget one?

    Have you ever heard about the black slavery that was once practiced in this country JR?

    I think they made a movie about it, if I'm not mistaken. But how many movies have they made about the genocidal treatment of innocent German civilians (who died by the millions after the second war was over). How many movies have they made about the monstrous and historical war crime of Dresden JR?

    Is it possible that our cultural institutions, and the media in particular- are in the hands of a people with a near monolithic contempt (hatred) for all things German? and consider their suffering and deaths by the millions to be of no consequence or concern? Just like the little white girl who is gang raped for days on end and then fed to alligators- when the sub-humans got done with her.

    Indeed, I suspect that right now, reading these words I'm typing, there is a very large percentage of people who're far more 0utraged at my characterization of these savage animals as "sub-humans" than they are at the incomprehensible suffering of that little girl, (and her loved ones). And that is all part of our carefully constructed programming. We're more sensitive to racial epitaphs than to a girl being fed to alligators.

    And all of that is to be expected. Because they don't do what they do for nothing JR. All of our memes and paradigms and narratives that make us all think and feel about events and the world around us are all part of our programming. None of us are born knowing the truth about the world and our place in it. We rely first on our parents and family to understand the world, and then on the media, the print and radio and television, (and only recently the Internet). So if the media, is (and I use the singular present tense verb 'is' deliberately) telling us that most all young, black teenage males are desperately trying to graduate and get their degrees so they can rise above all the racism that permeates our (irredeemably racist) society but then almost always while in their prime, and unarmed and walking around with their hands up and pleading not to get shot at least this one time- by yet another racist white [redundant] man with a gun, (often but not always with a badge too)- then this meme will take hold. It's guaranteed to, and that of course is the point.

    Now just for the record, there are racist white (and black and brown, etc..) men. And there are criminals and thugs and even murderers with guns and badges. But from what I've glimmered, most of America's cops, while being far too arrogant and thuggish, are nominally professionals. And if you, the reader, had to pick between your family's health and well being at the at the mercy of your typical urban young black men in America vs. the police, well then I can tell you that I know the streets, and I know Detroit and Miami, and there are places that they'd cut you to pieces as much as look at you. We get a very skewed version of reality from our msm, than exists in the real world, let me tell ya.

    And what follows is the obvious question why?

    Anyone with two peanuts rolling around in their noggins knows that Jews overwhelmingly own and control our msm. Duh. So the question becomes why do they treat white Americans with such overt hostility? Why are we (especially white, straight, southern, Christian men) always depicted as evil or pathetic- always deplorable? And irredeemable?

    (Perhaps not always, of course. But that is the meme. And we all know it).

    Is this hostility cultural, religious, or something more intractable?

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men - as congenital, if latent Nazis? Is that why they relentlessly foist non-white immigration on all white nations? Are they trying to protect themselves from a future potential holocaust by eliminating the threat in advance? What are the chances they might be creating the threat where none exists- with their 'cure'?

    Anyways, sorry for ruminating here on larger philosophical ramblings, but this article for me brings up important and extremely relevant questions.

    your post should be required reading for all middle school students.

  97. yes stalin killed more people than the kkk. so, an apologia must be penned for the kkk.
    who falls for this crap?

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
    My dear Lawrence--

    You heartily conflate apologies with the suggestion that media hysteria and histrionic history rewriters rake measure of themselves.
  98. @Boris

    In fact, the evidence suggests that the overwhelming majority of all racially-motivated violent attacks in America each year are committed by blacks
     
    This claim isn't supported by your source, which is a Thomas Sowell article that doesn't delve into the statistics at all.

    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014

    In 2014, race was reported for 5,192 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:

    52.0 percent were White.

    23.2 percent were Black or African American.

    in 2014, there were 3,227 victims of racially motivated hate crime.

    62.7 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Black or African American bias.

    22.7 percent were victims of anti-White bias.
     
    Now, this data isn't perfect. Certainly not all racially motivated attacks will be labelled as hate crimes. But there is no evidence here that blacks commit more racially motivated attacks, let alone the "overwhelming majority" of them.

    Those FBI figures are utterly useless. First, undoubtedly black victims of racist abuse are far more likely to report it than white, and general abuse is far more likely to be classified as racist if it is by a white person against a black person, for the obvious reason that racism is an obsession of blacks and of anti-white whites, not of whites in general, and also because most whites simply would not expect a report of racist abuse against them to be taken seriously.

    Second, note that Unz referred specifically to “violent” attacks, which I would interpret to mean aggravated assaults, or worse, against the person, not what the FBI classifies as “intimidation” (in this context, giving verbal offence to a member of one of the specially protected groups), simple assault (not included in the FBI’s classification of violent crimes, which are: Murder, Forcible Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Assault), or property crimes. These categories account for the vast majority of the FBI’s “hate crimes” (77%).

    It will be interesting to see whether Unz will substantiate this point and provide his reasoning and evidence, but it seems reasonable on its face that the majority of violent race hatred crimes would be committed by blacks against whites because blacks are per capita far more criminally violent (as the statistics prove) in general, and many if not most blacks are also obviously obsessed with race issues and chock full of race resentment, stoked by our media and their own race-baiting identity lobbyist politicians. Whether that is sufficiently the case to overcome the fact that they represent only 12% or so of the US population is all you need reliable figures for. In the absence of such figures, it seems a reasonable presumption that it is.

    • Replies: @Boris

    Those FBI figures are utterly useless. First, undoubtedly black victims of racist abuse are far more likely to report it than white
     
    Undoubtedly? It seems you are just making things up to support your conclusions. We are trying to deduce the number of "racially motivated violent attacks" here, and it makes no sense to assume that white people are just not reporting them.

    These categories account for the vast majority of the FBI’s “hate crimes” (77%).
     
    As I said, the data aren't perfect. Unless we implausibly assign all intimidation and property crimes to whites, the data don't come close to supporting the claim.
  99. @Boris

    In fact, the evidence suggests that the overwhelming majority of all racially-motivated violent attacks in America each year are committed by blacks
     
    This claim isn't supported by your source, which is a Thomas Sowell article that doesn't delve into the statistics at all.

    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014

    In 2014, race was reported for 5,192 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:

    52.0 percent were White.

    23.2 percent were Black or African American.

    in 2014, there were 3,227 victims of racially motivated hate crime.

    62.7 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Black or African American bias.

    22.7 percent were victims of anti-White bias.
     
    Now, this data isn't perfect. Certainly not all racially motivated attacks will be labelled as hate crimes. But there is no evidence here that blacks commit more racially motivated attacks, let alone the "overwhelming majority" of them.

    Conveniently for Doris, the data only goes up to 2014.

    Now, what happened in 2015 and 2016 that might affect the data?

    • Replies: @roofgoat
    the data Boris posted is as truthful as the unemployment and inflation data we have been getting for years.

    I don't think that more than a day goes by where I don't see an article buried in the news along the likes of.......Jarvniasious Williams, 28, Quanalitha Moore, 24, N'talah Jenkins, 23, were arrested for the beating, burning, rape and robbery of (white granny) Agatha Proctor, 82.

    Every f'n day this happens but hey, white privilege and BLM.

    The delusion and denial in our country and (the west) is incalculable. There is no longer any excuse to not know exactly what is happening in Obama's America. Sure, the media could fool us years ago with no internet. I too was naïve.

    What I have seen every day is unforgiveable. Yet the power to deny is still heavy in the air.

    Mengele said it best..."the more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it".

    Amazing how that quote applies to those that should know better. Those meaning right leaning, gun owning, Christ believing, US mil loving white guys today.
    , @Boris
    Yes, the rise of Trump might have inspired more white offenders. Anecdotally I remember one such case from Boston.
  100. Perhaps such disturbing speculation is mistaken

    It strikes me as rather offensive victim-blaming. Even by the wife’s testimony, no sexual assault occurred and there is no evidence for it. I’m not sure how Till being 150 lbs. or having a criminal father weighs into the facts of the case. Both seem irrelevant to me and I don’t think they would change the public perception of the case one bit.

  101. If, as Ron suggests, the majority of the American public is becoming inoculated against virus of the Media, then they will have already noticed it and must have started planning to reduce the new-found immunity …

    I wonder what the plans are?

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    You've not noticed the wave after wave of proposals for control of the internet?
    Unique biometric ID's are on the way for internet access.

    One Hillary Clinton was whingeing as far back as 1998 about the lack of a gate-keeping function.
    http://www.spectacle.org/398/hillary.html

    (What happened in 1998? Think blue dress)

  102. @Lawrence Fitton
    yes stalin killed more people than the kkk. so, an apologia must be penned for the kkk.
    who falls for this crap?

    My dear Lawrence–

    You heartily conflate apologies with the suggestion that media hysteria and histrionic history rewriters rake measure of themselves.

  103. @dahoit
    Zimmerman was half Jewish right?
    He certainly doesn't strike me as having any righteous character,and with all the subsequent crap he's done, I wouldn't believe him an iota.

    Well, I already stated my position on the Trayvon case. My position is simply that I don’t know.

    What fascinates me about the situation is how people who cannot possibly know either express such certainty that they know what happened. That is a very interesting phenomenon.

    • Replies: @utu
    "What fascinates me about the situation is how people who cannot possibly know either express such certainty that they know what happened. That is a very interesting phenomenon." - Yes, it is very interesting phenomena. I discovered it in me during the Anita Hill/ Clarence Thomas controversy when after each testimony I was willing to believe the side that just presented their case. After this experience I concluded that humans cannot easily sustain the state of unknowing. Actually it is evolutionary detrimental to not know because this may paralyze your decision process. For this reason I do not believe that there are true agnostics. People either believe there is god or that there is no god. So, unknowing is only a quasi stable state from which one very quickly drops to the stable and thus comfortable position of knowing this or that. The more stupid person is the most like is the case that the person never experience a conscious state of unknowing for a prolonged time period. It require a significant intellectual apparatus and strong exertion of will to sustain the unknowing state. Being in the unknowing state is further made more difficult by the fact that you are surrounded almost w/o exceptions by those who do know.

    The state of knowing is a psychological state that has nothing to do whether what a person know is objectively true. Long time ago I worked on a mathematical problem that I could not solve for days. And one night I had a dream in which the solution to the problem presented to myself. I had an immense sense of knowing. Once I woke up I stared working on the problem and the feeling of knowing was slowly dissipating as realization was coming to me that the solution presented in the dream was totally false.

    It seems that the word to know should always be put in quotation marks.
  104. Bravo!

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
    Hey Fred, why aren't you writing comments under your own recent "Tinfoil hat" article defending yourself against all the torrent of criticism coming from various people (me and many others).

    I have only written 3 articles on this site so far, but I was very serious about it. If I write something, I stand by it and anybody who tried to attack anything I said logically or factually, I debated with them. You, on the other hand, just seemed to have gone AWOL.

    What's going on here? Are you just conceding that you can't really defend anything you wrote because it all just came out of your ass?

    Well, I guess the thing is that I like to think I am a serious person. You apparently don't suffer from that hangup.
  105. @Rurik
    OK JR,

    Since we're usually in agreement, I'll bounce my thoughts on this into the blogosphere..

    This is a brave and powerful article by Mr. Unz. It touches on a verboten subject and eviscerates and holds high the dripping entrails of the Orwellian mendacity enshrouding the length and breath of our entire society, from top to bottom. - That there is a knee-jerk hostility to Western (white) culture and people emanating out of all of our cultural institutions (and especially Hollywood) is so plainly obvious to anyone with eyes and ears that we all just take it for granted.

    That the rape and murder (and horrific treatment) of that teenage white girl wasn't reported in the news isn't going to raise eyebrows anywhere. We all know that's how it works. It's a one way street. If a black person is a victim, (or even if they aren't, as in the case of the Duke "rapists", or Travon, or Michael Brown, etcetera ad nauseam.. ) the media will shriek hysterically for days on end, until the whole world! (literally) knows about the Duke "rapists" or the numinous Travon, with his picture at 12 years old. Obama's son.

    But if it's a white victim, like the young people who died during the Wichita massacre, or Channon Christian and her boyfriend, then no one will have ever heard of them outside the local news.

    It goes like this with every crime and even historical events. Everything is filtered through the sieve of political correctness.

    Have you ever heard of the Holocaust JR? It seems to me there was a movie, or perhaps even two that were made about that event, yet there were over a hundred million victims of communism during the 20th century. Now, I can't remember the names of all those movies they made about the Holodomor (the genocide of white Christians by the millions by starvation). Didn't Steven Spielberg direct and Harvey Weinstein produce that big budget one?

    Have you ever heard about the black slavery that was once practiced in this country JR?

    I think they made a movie about it, if I'm not mistaken. But how many movies have they made about the genocidal treatment of innocent German civilians (who died by the millions after the second war was over). How many movies have they made about the monstrous and historical war crime of Dresden JR?

    Is it possible that our cultural institutions, and the media in particular- are in the hands of a people with a near monolithic contempt (hatred) for all things German? and consider their suffering and deaths by the millions to be of no consequence or concern? Just like the little white girl who is gang raped for days on end and then fed to alligators- when the sub-humans got done with her.

    Indeed, I suspect that right now, reading these words I'm typing, there is a very large percentage of people who're far more 0utraged at my characterization of these savage animals as "sub-humans" than they are at the incomprehensible suffering of that little girl, (and her loved ones). And that is all part of our carefully constructed programming. We're more sensitive to racial epitaphs than to a girl being fed to alligators.

    And all of that is to be expected. Because they don't do what they do for nothing JR. All of our memes and paradigms and narratives that make us all think and feel about events and the world around us are all part of our programming. None of us are born knowing the truth about the world and our place in it. We rely first on our parents and family to understand the world, and then on the media, the print and radio and television, (and only recently the Internet). So if the media, is (and I use the singular present tense verb 'is' deliberately) telling us that most all young, black teenage males are desperately trying to graduate and get their degrees so they can rise above all the racism that permeates our (irredeemably racist) society but then almost always while in their prime, and unarmed and walking around with their hands up and pleading not to get shot at least this one time- by yet another racist white [redundant] man with a gun, (often but not always with a badge too)- then this meme will take hold. It's guaranteed to, and that of course is the point.

    Now just for the record, there are racist white (and black and brown, etc..) men. And there are criminals and thugs and even murderers with guns and badges. But from what I've glimmered, most of America's cops, while being far too arrogant and thuggish, are nominally professionals. And if you, the reader, had to pick between your family's health and well being at the at the mercy of your typical urban young black men in America vs. the police, well then I can tell you that I know the streets, and I know Detroit and Miami, and there are places that they'd cut you to pieces as much as look at you. We get a very skewed version of reality from our msm, than exists in the real world, let me tell ya.

    And what follows is the obvious question why?

    Anyone with two peanuts rolling around in their noggins knows that Jews overwhelmingly own and control our msm. Duh. So the question becomes why do they treat white Americans with such overt hostility? Why are we (especially white, straight, southern, Christian men) always depicted as evil or pathetic- always deplorable? And irredeemable?

    (Perhaps not always, of course. But that is the meme. And we all know it).

    Is this hostility cultural, religious, or something more intractable?

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men - as congenital, if latent Nazis? Is that why they relentlessly foist non-white immigration on all white nations? Are they trying to protect themselves from a future potential holocaust by eliminating the threat in advance? What are the chances they might be creating the threat where none exists- with their 'cure'?

    Anyways, sorry for ruminating here on larger philosophical ramblings, but this article for me brings up important and extremely relevant questions.

    I agree with almost every thing you said, Rurik. The only things I disagree with are your thoughts on the Holocaust, and your characterization of the causes of Jewish paranoia.

    It’s obvious that you know next to nothing about the Holocaust. It’s nothing to be ashamed of, mind you, as we have all been subjected to the relentless brainwashing program centered on the Jewish Holocaust mythology. I urge you to investigate the Holocaust with much more diligence, and rigor, than you have. By doing this you will be able to clear your mind of a huge cloud of Jewish brainwashing. A great place to start would be the writings of David Irving…the Jews absolutely despise him and have gone to great lengths to smear and attack him; there is “anti-Irving” propaganda that has been inserted into one or two Hollywood movies. Irving has also been viciously attacked by the MSM…they accused him of providing the trigger mechanisms for the Oklahoma city bomb! Ernst Zundel is another good one…he’s been jailed several times for his efforts to get the truth out to the people. Fred Leuchter and Robert Faurisson are also good…the Jews beat the shit out of Faurisson on a couple of occasions.

    The Hostile Jewish Elite do not fear and distrust white folks because they might be closet-Nazi’s. They practically invented the entire Nazi-as-mass-murderer narrative, so, why would they be apprehensive about some fictitious idea that they themselves created? The real reason they fear and distrust white people in particular is because they’re up to no good and they’re deeply afraid we’ll discover their treacheries!

    Well, we are uncovering their intrigues and bringing them into the light. They are terrified by our rapid progress and are frantically trying to impede us in every possible way. It’s good that people are waking up to the clandestine programs of the International Jew, but, there is a massive downside to our truth-telling efforts…the more truth we expose the more hostile and violent they become!

    • Replies: @Rurik

    I disagree with are your thoughts on the Holocaust, and your characterization of the causes of Jewish paranoia.
     

    The real reason they fear and distrust white people in particular is because they’re up to no good and they’re deeply afraid we’ll discover their treacheries!
     
    and then what? Another Holocaust!

    I agree that much of what we've been told vis-a-vis the Holocaust was a fraud. (And some of it was true). But be that as it may, I suspect that most Jews are raised to believe it was all true. And that the goyim have been persecuting them for 2000 years, blah, blah, blah. You see what that does is it reinforces the idea that the Jews need to stick together and support their leaders- the rabbis who need money to keep them all protected, and stay suspicious of the dangerous and eternally anti-Semitic goyim. And have your fun with the shiksas, but don't marry them!

    It's a scam, but it works for the rabbis and the powerful Jews, so they keep the common Jews under their thrall. Divide and conquer.
  106. @Randal
    Those FBI figures are utterly useless. First, undoubtedly black victims of racist abuse are far more likely to report it than white, and general abuse is far more likely to be classified as racist if it is by a white person against a black person, for the obvious reason that racism is an obsession of blacks and of anti-white whites, not of whites in general, and also because most whites simply would not expect a report of racist abuse against them to be taken seriously.

    Second, note that Unz referred specifically to "violent" attacks, which I would interpret to mean aggravated assaults, or worse, against the person, not what the FBI classifies as "intimidation" (in this context, giving verbal offence to a member of one of the specially protected groups), simple assault (not included in the FBI's classification of violent crimes, which are: Murder, Forcible Rape, Robbery, Aggravated Assault), or property crimes. These categories account for the vast majority of the FBI's "hate crimes" (77%).

    It will be interesting to see whether Unz will substantiate this point and provide his reasoning and evidence, but it seems reasonable on its face that the majority of violent race hatred crimes would be committed by blacks against whites because blacks are per capita far more criminally violent (as the statistics prove) in general, and many if not most blacks are also obviously obsessed with race issues and chock full of race resentment, stoked by our media and their own race-baiting identity lobbyist politicians. Whether that is sufficiently the case to overcome the fact that they represent only 12% or so of the US population is all you need reliable figures for. In the absence of such figures, it seems a reasonable presumption that it is.

    Those FBI figures are utterly useless. First, undoubtedly black victims of racist abuse are far more likely to report it than white

    Undoubtedly? It seems you are just making things up to support your conclusions. We are trying to deduce the number of “racially motivated violent attacks” here, and it makes no sense to assume that white people are just not reporting them.

    These categories account for the vast majority of the FBI’s “hate crimes” (77%).

    As I said, the data aren’t perfect. Unless we implausibly assign all intimidation and property crimes to whites, the data don’t come close to supporting the claim.

    • Replies: @Randal

    Undoubtedly? It seems you are just making things up to support your conclusions.
     
    "Undoubtedly" clearly indicates that it's my opinion. You might well think, or claim to think, that whites are as likely to report a crime against them as "racist" as blacks, but obviously I (and I think most honest and informed folks) would regard such a claim as, frankly, pretty silly.

    We are trying to deduce the number of “racially motivated violent attacks” here, and it makes no sense to assume that white people are just not reporting them.
     
    No, what is likely is that whites are reporting the crimes just as robberies, aggravated assaults, etc, whereas blacks are doing their usual "victim of whitey" thing and reporting such things as racist (including when the whole thing is made up - see the well established phenomenon of hate hoaxes).
  107. @SolontoCroesus

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men – as congenital, if latent Nazis?
     
    jeezus krist on tortilla, Rurik.

    try to analyze Nazism for what it actually was, not what the very same "Jewish controlled media" has brainwashed you to believe it was.

    Unz essayed on the massive propaganda effort the British executed to involve USA in WWII (as also WWI, but that's another story).

    Jews were equally involved in propagandizing USA to get Americans to acquiesce to WWII.
    Jews were deeply involved in psychological warfare against Germans for over five years post-war
    to substantiate both points, see Cora Sol Goldstein, "Capturing the German Eye."

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.

    Every time you use the analogy, "zionism = Nazi;" or Jews = 'latent Nazis,' you're fellating Bibi, deep and long, and he's in pervert heaven.

    Hitler had the effrontery to resist "Jewish control of media," and for that offense, Deutschland delenda est.

    Move beyond the brainwashing.

    Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from "Jewish control of media," nonviolently -- or to borrow Richard Breitman's phrase, "semi-legally," and in your cogitations, consider how the example of the destruction of Germany serves as a warning; and how the people of the USA are to avoid the same treatment.

    Plus this little beauty from 1933 seems to have been memory-holed

    https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http:%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-xWGfRzA7VCw%2FVLFSSlqD8QI%2FAAAAAAAAUNI%2F3-3SzDzhzVU%2Fw1200-h630-p-nu%2FJews_declare_war_on_Germany.png&sp=4e1204e7b4b940b4440f81a7bb90c743


    “Jews declare war on Germany”

  108. @Rurik
    OK JR,

    Since we're usually in agreement, I'll bounce my thoughts on this into the blogosphere..

    This is a brave and powerful article by Mr. Unz. It touches on a verboten subject and eviscerates and holds high the dripping entrails of the Orwellian mendacity enshrouding the length and breath of our entire society, from top to bottom. - That there is a knee-jerk hostility to Western (white) culture and people emanating out of all of our cultural institutions (and especially Hollywood) is so plainly obvious to anyone with eyes and ears that we all just take it for granted.

    That the rape and murder (and horrific treatment) of that teenage white girl wasn't reported in the news isn't going to raise eyebrows anywhere. We all know that's how it works. It's a one way street. If a black person is a victim, (or even if they aren't, as in the case of the Duke "rapists", or Travon, or Michael Brown, etcetera ad nauseam.. ) the media will shriek hysterically for days on end, until the whole world! (literally) knows about the Duke "rapists" or the numinous Travon, with his picture at 12 years old. Obama's son.

    But if it's a white victim, like the young people who died during the Wichita massacre, or Channon Christian and her boyfriend, then no one will have ever heard of them outside the local news.

    It goes like this with every crime and even historical events. Everything is filtered through the sieve of political correctness.

    Have you ever heard of the Holocaust JR? It seems to me there was a movie, or perhaps even two that were made about that event, yet there were over a hundred million victims of communism during the 20th century. Now, I can't remember the names of all those movies they made about the Holodomor (the genocide of white Christians by the millions by starvation). Didn't Steven Spielberg direct and Harvey Weinstein produce that big budget one?

    Have you ever heard about the black slavery that was once practiced in this country JR?

    I think they made a movie about it, if I'm not mistaken. But how many movies have they made about the genocidal treatment of innocent German civilians (who died by the millions after the second war was over). How many movies have they made about the monstrous and historical war crime of Dresden JR?

    Is it possible that our cultural institutions, and the media in particular- are in the hands of a people with a near monolithic contempt (hatred) for all things German? and consider their suffering and deaths by the millions to be of no consequence or concern? Just like the little white girl who is gang raped for days on end and then fed to alligators- when the sub-humans got done with her.

    Indeed, I suspect that right now, reading these words I'm typing, there is a very large percentage of people who're far more 0utraged at my characterization of these savage animals as "sub-humans" than they are at the incomprehensible suffering of that little girl, (and her loved ones). And that is all part of our carefully constructed programming. We're more sensitive to racial epitaphs than to a girl being fed to alligators.

    And all of that is to be expected. Because they don't do what they do for nothing JR. All of our memes and paradigms and narratives that make us all think and feel about events and the world around us are all part of our programming. None of us are born knowing the truth about the world and our place in it. We rely first on our parents and family to understand the world, and then on the media, the print and radio and television, (and only recently the Internet). So if the media, is (and I use the singular present tense verb 'is' deliberately) telling us that most all young, black teenage males are desperately trying to graduate and get their degrees so they can rise above all the racism that permeates our (irredeemably racist) society but then almost always while in their prime, and unarmed and walking around with their hands up and pleading not to get shot at least this one time- by yet another racist white [redundant] man with a gun, (often but not always with a badge too)- then this meme will take hold. It's guaranteed to, and that of course is the point.

    Now just for the record, there are racist white (and black and brown, etc..) men. And there are criminals and thugs and even murderers with guns and badges. But from what I've glimmered, most of America's cops, while being far too arrogant and thuggish, are nominally professionals. And if you, the reader, had to pick between your family's health and well being at the at the mercy of your typical urban young black men in America vs. the police, well then I can tell you that I know the streets, and I know Detroit and Miami, and there are places that they'd cut you to pieces as much as look at you. We get a very skewed version of reality from our msm, than exists in the real world, let me tell ya.

    And what follows is the obvious question why?

    Anyone with two peanuts rolling around in their noggins knows that Jews overwhelmingly own and control our msm. Duh. So the question becomes why do they treat white Americans with such overt hostility? Why are we (especially white, straight, southern, Christian men) always depicted as evil or pathetic- always deplorable? And irredeemable?

    (Perhaps not always, of course. But that is the meme. And we all know it).

    Is this hostility cultural, religious, or something more intractable?

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men - as congenital, if latent Nazis? Is that why they relentlessly foist non-white immigration on all white nations? Are they trying to protect themselves from a future potential holocaust by eliminating the threat in advance? What are the chances they might be creating the threat where none exists- with their 'cure'?

    Anyways, sorry for ruminating here on larger philosophical ramblings, but this article for me brings up important and extremely relevant questions.

    You’re suffering from “White Victim Mentality” dude. The White race has long been made impotent by the Organized Jewry which not only rule Europe now, but also United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Therefore, there is no chance of a new Jewish ethnic-cleansing in the White societies.

    The reasons the pro-Israel Jewish groups support Muslim immigration to the West, is, a)get rid of anti-Israel Arabs from the Middle East, and 2) to use Muslim immigrants to create anti-West false flag operations to prove that Europe has not got rid of its centuries-old anti-Semitism.

    There 15 European nations where insulting Islam is “freedom of speech”, but challenging the 6-million Jewish death myth is a crime punishable with 3-year in jail or a heavy fine – or both.

    But don’t worry, Israel has found several HITLERS among non-Whites such as Bishop Tutu, Ahmadinejad, Bashar al-Assad, etc. who are set to leash another Jewish Holocaust.

    In September 2014, South African Jewish weekly, ‘The Jewish Report’ in an Op-Ed, entitled ‘Arch no better than Hitler or Stalin’ written by country’s Israeli Likud party president Leon Reich, equating South Africa’s former Archbishop Desmond Tutu with Adolf Hitler and Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

    “Just as it was more important for Hitler to kill Jews than protect the fatherland in the last days of (WW II) war so it is more important for Tutu to kill Jews rather to protect his fellow Christians,” wrote Reich…..

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/09/16/s-a-jew-leader-bishop-tutu-is-adolf-hitler/

  109. @Wanderer
    Conveniently for Doris, the data only goes up to 2014.

    Now, what happened in 2015 and 2016 that might affect the data?

    the data Boris posted is as truthful as the unemployment and inflation data we have been getting for years.

    I don’t think that more than a day goes by where I don’t see an article buried in the news along the likes of…….Jarvniasious Williams, 28, Quanalitha Moore, 24, N’talah Jenkins, 23, were arrested for the beating, burning, rape and robbery of (white granny) Agatha Proctor, 82.

    Every f’n day this happens but hey, white privilege and BLM.

    The delusion and denial in our country and (the west) is incalculable. There is no longer any excuse to not know exactly what is happening in Obama’s America. Sure, the media could fool us years ago with no internet. I too was naïve.

    What I have seen every day is unforgiveable. Yet the power to deny is still heavy in the air.

    Mengele said it best…”the more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it”.

    Amazing how that quote applies to those that should know better. Those meaning right leaning, gun owning, Christ believing, US mil loving white guys today.

    • Replies: @Boris

    the data Boris posted is as truthful as the unemployment and inflation data we have been getting for years.
     
    Are you kidding? White nationalists love FBI crime data. You mean their love was based on results and not an objective understanding of the methodology and limitations? I'm shocked.
    , @SolontoCroesus

    Mengele said it best…”the more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it”.
     
    I googled that quote. Among the links on the first page was one to the project of Ms. Rene Brown's Language Arts class at Peters Township middle school.

    The student-writers posted their references -- almost all to websites, except for notes from Ms. Brown's lectures. The Mengele quote was sourced to http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote/joseph_mengele_quote_e5e2

    The student writing contained numerous spelling and grammar errors, but hey, they're just 12- and 13- year olds (or were 6 years ago; now they're old enough to vote).

    Here's what else they had to say about Dr. Mengele:

    He killed women with injections that caused horrible pain, stomach spasms, and bleeding (Auschwitz). Dr. Herta Oberhauser also came to Auschwitz (Auschwtiz). She worked mostly with adults. She gave them oil injections, took out main organs, and threw sawdust and chipped glass into open wounds (Auschwitz).

    . . .

     Josef Mengele was always the fist doctor that was called when an "experiment" needed to be done (The Holocaust). He preformed untrained spinal surgery, body dissection, and twin sketches on his patients (Auschwitz). The get his experimental bodies he went into the barracks and offered clothes and candy to people (Auschwitz). Then he took them personally to the laboratory (Auschwitz). He mostly experimented on the children rather than the adults (Auschwitz).
    . . .
    Tortures were only done to amuse people . . .to find cheaper and easier ways to kill people.
     
    Of special interest was Ms. Brown's students' mention of Mengele's experiments on twins:

     When a pair of twins was found they would be killed at the exact same time to keep the body cycle in sync (Auschwitz). Mengele then dissected each twin personally because he liked to sketch every part of their bodies exactly (Auschwitz). Josef Mengele did numerous tests to see how the twins reacted (Gates). He put dye in their eyes to attempt to change their eye color (Gates). Mengele stated, "The more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it"(Dr. Joseph Mengele). He was almost fanatical about drawing and exchanging blood (The Holocaust). The victims were usually left without bandages and died because of infection if they did not die during the experiment (The Holocaust). If the victims did not die during or after the experiment cycle they were killed (Auschwitz).
     
    I find this passage interesting because it is very similar to the conversation an 86-year old holocaust survivor had with an interviewer on NPR last year. The occasion was the trial of a 93-year old German man on trial as an accomplice to murder based on his work as a baggage handler at trains to concentration camps. The woman said she had been contacted by legal staff in the prosecution of the German. She said that she and her twin sister were at Auschwitz, where she became very ill. "Dr. Mengele stood by my bed and said I would die in two or three days. I was determined not to die because if I died he would kill my twin sister."

    No doubt it was her "determination not to die" rather than the care she received in the hospital at Auschwitz that accounts for her survival to the fine age of 86, still healthy enough to travel to Europe to participate in the prosecution of a 93-year old baggage handler. (He was convicted and sentenced to prison.)

    ---

    What happens when the 12- to 14-year old students in Ms. Brown's class grow up? They posted on the world wide web, in about 2009:

    Around eleven million people were killed during the Holocaust. Six million of the people killed were Jewish and killed just because it was possible. The other five million people were non-Jews. They were killed because Hitler did not want them in his perfect race. His perfect race was known as the Aryian [sic] race. They were either killed on the spot or taken to death camps to suffer. In death camps people were killed by gassing, starvation, shooting, disease, burning, and any other way that was thought of. [emphasis theirs]
     
    Do they ever challenge these claims?

    They wrote:

    When prisioners [sic] first arrived in death camps, they were killed on the spot or sent straight to the gas chambers unless they were fit to work (The Holocaust). They would be forced into the gas chambers or just shot on the spot (Gates). They could also die of starvation, disease, shooting, and burning (Auschwitz). The gas chambers were used to exterminate large sums of people using Zyklon-B gas (The Holocaust). Jews, gypsies, Soviet POWs and other prisoners were all killed (The Holocaust). If the prisioners [sic] were fit to work they would receive [sic] hard and pointless jobs (Auschwitz). Ms. Brown stated, “Some of the jobs were even assisting in the killings of  their friends and family”(Brown).  Some prisioners were also killed through brutal medical experiments.
     
    Ron Unz wrote:

    “We naively tend to assume that our media accurately reflects the events of our world and its history, but instead what we all too often see are only the tremendously distorted images of a circus fun-house mirror, with small items sometimes transformed into large ones, and large ones into small. The contours of historical reality may be warped into almost unrecognizable shapes, with some important elements completely disappearing from the record and others appearing out of nowhere. I’ve often suggested that the media creates our reality, but given such glaring omissions and distortions, the reality produced is often largely fictional. Our standard histories have always criticized the ludicrous Soviet propaganda during the height of Stalin’s purges or the Ukrainian famine, but in its own way, our own media organs sometimes seem just as dishonest and absurd in their own reporting.”

    Does the same apply to America's teachers?

    What happens when our young people -- those then-13-year olds, now 19- to 20-year olds-- discover that "the historical reality" they learned in Ms. Brown's 3rd Period Language Arts class at Peters Township Middle School (a Blue Ribbon School!) was "warped into almost unrecognizable shapes . . . dishonest and absurd . . ."

    Does the same pattern that Unz claimed applies to media, apply also to the public education system in the US?

    “A pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long produces obvious consequences. On a whole range of issues, certainly including racial ones, [as well as claims about Nazis and holocaust] the American media education system may be fast approaching the point of possessing negative credibility, with increasing numbers of people tending to assume that the facts may be exactly opposite to what the media their teachers claim."
     
    Several years ago Jeremy ben Ami, founder of J-Street, spoke about a book he had just written, about the I-P conflict. In the audience was a man who teaches Ben Ami's children. That teacher asked, "What shall we teach our children?"

    ben Ami acknowledged that the question had very personal import.
    He answered the question: "We must tell them the truth, otherwise there will be resentment."
    ben Ami's voice trailed off and the book event ended.
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?301263-1/new-voice-israel

    Who is going to tell Rene Brown's 3rd Period Literary Arts class that they were lied to, and how will they react?

    (And who is going to tell them that they really ought to spell-check their work.)
  110. @Rurik
    OK JR,

    Since we're usually in agreement, I'll bounce my thoughts on this into the blogosphere..

    This is a brave and powerful article by Mr. Unz. It touches on a verboten subject and eviscerates and holds high the dripping entrails of the Orwellian mendacity enshrouding the length and breath of our entire society, from top to bottom. - That there is a knee-jerk hostility to Western (white) culture and people emanating out of all of our cultural institutions (and especially Hollywood) is so plainly obvious to anyone with eyes and ears that we all just take it for granted.

    That the rape and murder (and horrific treatment) of that teenage white girl wasn't reported in the news isn't going to raise eyebrows anywhere. We all know that's how it works. It's a one way street. If a black person is a victim, (or even if they aren't, as in the case of the Duke "rapists", or Travon, or Michael Brown, etcetera ad nauseam.. ) the media will shriek hysterically for days on end, until the whole world! (literally) knows about the Duke "rapists" or the numinous Travon, with his picture at 12 years old. Obama's son.

    But if it's a white victim, like the young people who died during the Wichita massacre, or Channon Christian and her boyfriend, then no one will have ever heard of them outside the local news.

    It goes like this with every crime and even historical events. Everything is filtered through the sieve of political correctness.

    Have you ever heard of the Holocaust JR? It seems to me there was a movie, or perhaps even two that were made about that event, yet there were over a hundred million victims of communism during the 20th century. Now, I can't remember the names of all those movies they made about the Holodomor (the genocide of white Christians by the millions by starvation). Didn't Steven Spielberg direct and Harvey Weinstein produce that big budget one?

    Have you ever heard about the black slavery that was once practiced in this country JR?

    I think they made a movie about it, if I'm not mistaken. But how many movies have they made about the genocidal treatment of innocent German civilians (who died by the millions after the second war was over). How many movies have they made about the monstrous and historical war crime of Dresden JR?

    Is it possible that our cultural institutions, and the media in particular- are in the hands of a people with a near monolithic contempt (hatred) for all things German? and consider their suffering and deaths by the millions to be of no consequence or concern? Just like the little white girl who is gang raped for days on end and then fed to alligators- when the sub-humans got done with her.

    Indeed, I suspect that right now, reading these words I'm typing, there is a very large percentage of people who're far more 0utraged at my characterization of these savage animals as "sub-humans" than they are at the incomprehensible suffering of that little girl, (and her loved ones). And that is all part of our carefully constructed programming. We're more sensitive to racial epitaphs than to a girl being fed to alligators.

    And all of that is to be expected. Because they don't do what they do for nothing JR. All of our memes and paradigms and narratives that make us all think and feel about events and the world around us are all part of our programming. None of us are born knowing the truth about the world and our place in it. We rely first on our parents and family to understand the world, and then on the media, the print and radio and television, (and only recently the Internet). So if the media, is (and I use the singular present tense verb 'is' deliberately) telling us that most all young, black teenage males are desperately trying to graduate and get their degrees so they can rise above all the racism that permeates our (irredeemably racist) society but then almost always while in their prime, and unarmed and walking around with their hands up and pleading not to get shot at least this one time- by yet another racist white [redundant] man with a gun, (often but not always with a badge too)- then this meme will take hold. It's guaranteed to, and that of course is the point.

    Now just for the record, there are racist white (and black and brown, etc..) men. And there are criminals and thugs and even murderers with guns and badges. But from what I've glimmered, most of America's cops, while being far too arrogant and thuggish, are nominally professionals. And if you, the reader, had to pick between your family's health and well being at the at the mercy of your typical urban young black men in America vs. the police, well then I can tell you that I know the streets, and I know Detroit and Miami, and there are places that they'd cut you to pieces as much as look at you. We get a very skewed version of reality from our msm, than exists in the real world, let me tell ya.

    And what follows is the obvious question why?

    Anyone with two peanuts rolling around in their noggins knows that Jews overwhelmingly own and control our msm. Duh. So the question becomes why do they treat white Americans with such overt hostility? Why are we (especially white, straight, southern, Christian men) always depicted as evil or pathetic- always deplorable? And irredeemable?

    (Perhaps not always, of course. But that is the meme. And we all know it).

    Is this hostility cultural, religious, or something more intractable?

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men - as congenital, if latent Nazis? Is that why they relentlessly foist non-white immigration on all white nations? Are they trying to protect themselves from a future potential holocaust by eliminating the threat in advance? What are the chances they might be creating the threat where none exists- with their 'cure'?

    Anyways, sorry for ruminating here on larger philosophical ramblings, but this article for me brings up important and extremely relevant questions.

    You’re suffering from “White Victim Mentality” dude. The White race has long been made impotent by the Organized Jewry which not only rule Europe now, but also United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Therefore, there is no chance of a new Jewish ethnic-cleansing in the White societies.

    The reasons the pro-Israel Jewish groups support Muslim immigration to the West, is, a)get rid of anti-Israel Arabs from the Middle East, and 2) to use Muslim immigrants to create anti-West false flag operations to prove that Europe has not got rid of its centuries-old anti-Semitism.

    There 15 European nations where insulting Islam is “freedom of speech”, but challenging the 6-million Jewish death myth is a crime punishable with 3-year in jail or a heavy fine – or both.

    But don’t worry, Israel has found several HITLERS among non-Whites such as Bishop Tutu, Ahmadinejad, Bashar al-Assad, etc. who are set to leash another Jewish Holocaust.

    In September 2014, South African Jewish weekly, ‘The Jewish Report’ in an Op-Ed, entitled ‘Arch no better than Hitler or Stalin’ written by country’s Israeli Likud party president Leon Reich, equating South Africa’s former Archbishop Desmond Tutu with Adolf Hitler and Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

    “Just as it was more important for Hitler to kill Jews than protect the fatherland in the last days of (WW II) war so it is more important for Tutu to kill Jews rather to protect his fellow Christians,” wrote Reich…..

    https://rehmat1.com/2014/09/16/s-a-jew-leader-bishop-tutu-is-adolf-hitler/

  111. @Fred Reed
    Bravo!

    Hey Fred, why aren’t you writing comments under your own recent “Tinfoil hat” article defending yourself against all the torrent of criticism coming from various people (me and many others).

    I have only written 3 articles on this site so far, but I was very serious about it. If I write something, I stand by it and anybody who tried to attack anything I said logically or factually, I debated with them. You, on the other hand, just seemed to have gone AWOL.

    What’s going on here? Are you just conceding that you can’t really defend anything you wrote because it all just came out of your ass?

    Well, I guess the thing is that I like to think I am a serious person. You apparently don’t suffer from that hangup.

    • Replies: @Anymous
    As is often the case, I have to disagree with you, more on the form than the substance, but for once also on the substance.

    It's hard to have read more than a little by Reed and not realize he is a writer of above-doubt integrity (and intelligence). And, well yes, patriotism.

    I find him undependable only when the topic comes to Mexico, Mexicans, and — to a minor degree — Jews. He then loses every objectivity.

    Still, he's a paradigm of objectivity 90% of the times or more, then, and I'm not going to speak in terms of "ass" and "seriousness" about somebody just because they let their personal preferences and life events (like his being married to a Mexican Jew and living in Mexico) sway them.
  112. @Wanderer
    Conveniently for Doris, the data only goes up to 2014.

    Now, what happened in 2015 and 2016 that might affect the data?

    Yes, the rise of Trump might have inspired more white offenders. Anecdotally I remember one such case from Boston.

    • Replies: @David In TN
    Did the "rise of Trump" inspire a black teen to burn alive an 85-year old white man named Gene Dacus recently in Birmingham, Alabama?
  113. @Wanderer
    If, as Ron suggests, the majority of the American public is becoming inoculated against virus of the Media, then they will have already noticed it and must have started planning to reduce the new-found immunity ...

    I wonder what the plans are?

    You’ve not noticed the wave after wave of proposals for control of the internet?
    Unique biometric ID’s are on the way for internet access.

    One Hillary Clinton was whingeing as far back as 1998 about the lack of a gate-keeping function.

    http://www.spectacle.org/398/hillary.html

    (What happened in 1998? Think blue dress)

  114. @Boris

    Those FBI figures are utterly useless. First, undoubtedly black victims of racist abuse are far more likely to report it than white
     
    Undoubtedly? It seems you are just making things up to support your conclusions. We are trying to deduce the number of "racially motivated violent attacks" here, and it makes no sense to assume that white people are just not reporting them.

    These categories account for the vast majority of the FBI’s “hate crimes” (77%).
     
    As I said, the data aren't perfect. Unless we implausibly assign all intimidation and property crimes to whites, the data don't come close to supporting the claim.

    Undoubtedly? It seems you are just making things up to support your conclusions.

    “Undoubtedly” clearly indicates that it’s my opinion. You might well think, or claim to think, that whites are as likely to report a crime against them as “racist” as blacks, but obviously I (and I think most honest and informed folks) would regard such a claim as, frankly, pretty silly.

    We are trying to deduce the number of “racially motivated violent attacks” here, and it makes no sense to assume that white people are just not reporting them.

    No, what is likely is that whites are reporting the crimes just as robberies, aggravated assaults, etc, whereas blacks are doing their usual “victim of whitey” thing and reporting such things as racist (including when the whole thing is made up – see the well established phenomenon of hate hoaxes).

    • Replies: @Boris

    I (and I think most honest and informed folks) would regard such a claim as, frankly, pretty silly.
     
    Informed? What information are you talking about?


    No, what is likely is that whites are reporting the crimes just as robberies, aggravated assaults, etc,
     
    So white people are withholding evidence of hate crimes? When they give their statements, they are leaving out details intentionally? That doesn't make much sense.


    whereas blacks are doing their usual “victim of whitey” thing and reporting such things as racist
     
    Well, first this seems to be built from nothing but your own prejudice. But also you don't seem to understand how crimes are reported and prosecuted. Nobody goes in and reports things as "racist" or "not racist." They give their statements, evidence is collected and police and DAs decide what charges to file.

    I still see no real evidence for Unz's claim.
  115. @SolontoCroesus

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men – as congenital, if latent Nazis?
     
    jeezus krist on tortilla, Rurik.

    try to analyze Nazism for what it actually was, not what the very same "Jewish controlled media" has brainwashed you to believe it was.

    Unz essayed on the massive propaganda effort the British executed to involve USA in WWII (as also WWI, but that's another story).

    Jews were equally involved in propagandizing USA to get Americans to acquiesce to WWII.
    Jews were deeply involved in psychological warfare against Germans for over five years post-war
    to substantiate both points, see Cora Sol Goldstein, "Capturing the German Eye."

    Jews have dominated anti-German anti-Nazi narratives from the time Hitler was appointed to chancellorship until this very day.

    Every time you use the analogy, "zionism = Nazi;" or Jews = 'latent Nazis,' you're fellating Bibi, deep and long, and he's in pervert heaven.

    Hitler had the effrontery to resist "Jewish control of media," and for that offense, Deutschland delenda est.

    Move beyond the brainwashing.

    Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from "Jewish control of media," nonviolently -- or to borrow Richard Breitman's phrase, "semi-legally," and in your cogitations, consider how the example of the destruction of Germany serves as a warning; and how the people of the USA are to avoid the same treatment.

    [Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from “Jewish control of media,” nonviolently or to borrow Richard Breitman’s phrase, “semi-legally,”]

    Well wouldn’t the straightforward route to that end be purchasing said media enterprises from Jewish hands? Organise a “Jewish Media Buyout Fund”.

    Start with Ron Unz. I estimate opening bids at $25m.

    Semi-legal would be an LBO using Nazi Gold.

    • Replies: @iffen
    Organise a “Jewish Media Buyout Fund”.

    Would this be legal? Can I publish a guide to non-Jewish influenced or owned media? Can I refuse to employ Jews in my media company simply because they are Jews?
    , @SolontoCroesus

    Semi-legal would be an LBO using Nazi Gold.
     
    1. Allies cleaned out every cave and castle they could find that held Nazi papers. The claims that Nazis "stole" someone else's gold strikes me as farcical. More likely the other way around.

    2. We know for a fact that Allies removed nearly 9 000 pieces of artwork from German museums and shipped them to New York. Allies also destroyed untold thousands of other items of German art. ("Capturing the German Eye," by Cora Sol Goldstein)

    3. According to Rick Atkinson, who hopes to be America's Homer to the story of WWII, US troops removed all manner of treasure from Germany (and France, Italy & North Africa). He recounts that military personnel tasked with recovering and returning to their loved ones the bodies of soldiers who died in Europe, would first remove all of the stolen items still remaining with that corpse. The goods included gems, watches, jewelry, gold, weapons, textiles, manuscripts and the like. The items were warehoused.

    4. Robert Wolfe, (late) director of the German archive at the National Archives, observed in a speech that the USA is in possession of a great deal of valuable items that have never been returned to the Germans.

    So here's what i would suggest about that leveraged buy-out, Sam: Jewish owners of media should consider that they have already been paid.
    Multiple times.
    If they agree to quietly quit any claim to resources of the American people that they have used to pernicious ends and to the disadvantage of the American people, the US legal system will refrain from prosecuting those who have acted as foreign agents for years, without properly registering.

    The US legal system will refrain from prosecuting certain Jews for lies that embroiled the USA in wars that cost the American taxpayers billions of dollars.

    The US legal system will allow them to keep their desk, chair, a suit of clothes and a pair of shoes. Make them good shoes, preferably ones that float, and start walking, all the way to Tel Aviv.

    (heh. again with the shoes. maybe it's freudian. )
  116. @Jonathan Revusky
    Well, I already stated my position on the Trayvon case. My position is simply that I don't know.

    What fascinates me about the situation is how people who cannot possibly know either express such certainty that they know what happened. That is a very interesting phenomenon.

    “What fascinates me about the situation is how people who cannot possibly know either express such certainty that they know what happened. That is a very interesting phenomenon.” – Yes, it is very interesting phenomena. I discovered it in me during the Anita Hill/ Clarence Thomas controversy when after each testimony I was willing to believe the side that just presented their case. After this experience I concluded that humans cannot easily sustain the state of unknowing. Actually it is evolutionary detrimental to not know because this may paralyze your decision process. For this reason I do not believe that there are true agnostics. People either believe there is god or that there is no god. So, unknowing is only a quasi stable state from which one very quickly drops to the stable and thus comfortable position of knowing this or that. The more stupid person is the most like is the case that the person never experience a conscious state of unknowing for a prolonged time period. It require a significant intellectual apparatus and strong exertion of will to sustain the unknowing state. Being in the unknowing state is further made more difficult by the fact that you are surrounded almost w/o exceptions by those who do know.

    The state of knowing is a psychological state that has nothing to do whether what a person know is objectively true. Long time ago I worked on a mathematical problem that I could not solve for days. And one night I had a dream in which the solution to the problem presented to myself. I had an immense sense of knowing. Once I woke up I stared working on the problem and the feeling of knowing was slowly dissipating as realization was coming to me that the solution presented in the dream was totally false.

    It seems that the word to know should always be put in quotation marks.

    • Replies: @Rurik

    I do not believe that there are true agnostics. People either believe there is god or that there is no god.
     
    well utu, I'm here to tell ya that I certainly am and basically always have been a true agnostic. I have no problem with not knowing if there's a God or not or if there's life after death or anything on the other side at all. I don't need to know what happened before time or the advent of the universe or universes. I don't need to understand what's on the other side of the border of the universe, or even if there is one. And on and on. I'm perfectly comfortable not knowing, since I'm 100% convinced that I can't know. Nobody can, IMHO. And that's alright with me because I have no choice in the matter. The only choice I have is whether or not to believe in things I can't understand or have knowledge about, and I do chose not to believe such things.

    Whatever, fine.

    But what got me thinking about all of this was your comment combined with JR's observation about Travon, et al.

    the Trayvon case. My position is simply that I don’t know.

    What fascinates me about the situation is how people who cannot possibly know either express such certainty that they know what happened. That is a very interesting phenomenon.
     
    I agree with JR here, because I've felt the same way about these issues. When the Travon affair first came to light, I simply waited to see the details emerge before I drew any conclusions. I was agnostic on the issue. I said at one point that if Zimmerman was lying about screaming for help or anything else, that justice should be merciless. But then when it all came out that Travon acted like a violent thug, and was assaulting Zimmerman in a potentially deadly way, I said fine. Although I still don't know if Zimmerman acted inappropriately during the whole affair. But just the way the media tried to lynch him and lied about what he actually said, I more or less was glad he got off.

    When Michael Green was left dead in the middle of the street, I was skeptical of the official account. But when I saw the video of him throttling the little store clerk, I basically considered him a thug. A nigger if you will, who lived by violence and died by violence.

    And when it came to some of the others, like Freddy Grey, I'm convinced that young man was not just murdered, but murdered in a cruel and monstrous way.

    But I always hold my verdict until the facts are in. Both with these sensational media circuses, or the existence of God.

    Just for the record. But I do like your characterization of the word 'know', nonetheless.
  117. @Rurik

    Race realists and all the racists among them are serving designed for them purpose in the greater scheme of divide and rule played by the top caste.
     
    while I agree that much of the BLM and media hysteria surrounding some non-racist crimes turned into racist crimes by the media (Travon) is intended to create hatred in the black community for white folks in general, and thereby foist a distraction from the real crimes of wars and monumental Wall Street swindles, etc...

    there does in my mind remain the quandary of 'race realism'

    let's put it this way...

    your seventeen year old daughter tells you she's going out with some friends for the night, and might be back late

    when they drive up to pick up your daughter, you notice the fellows in the car are the men in the photos of this story.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3762863/Girl-17-went-missing-Myrtle-Beach-2009-gang-raped-shot-fed-alligators-says-FBI-agent.html

    They seem age appropriate, don't get out of the car to come greet you but rather hang out with their hip-hop music thumping.. waiting for your daughter

    Now, what do you do as a father. Last weekend you let your daughter go out with some young white boys from her school and they brought her home safe after a fun evening. Now if you tell your daughter that you have reservations about her going with these fellows, guess what she's going to say? She's going to tremble, and perhaps begin shaking a little and her skin may flush and other subtle signs of intense agitation at the creeping moral horror and nauseating realization that OMG! - her very own dad is.. Oh God she can't even say it. A racist !

    She'll never look at you the same. She'll whisper to her friends (since at least she's still alive) that she never would have imagined that her own papa is a fucking racist

    Your reputation with her entire group of friends and their parents and the entire community will be destroyed, perhaps for ever.

    That for me is the kind of conundrum that must be happening all over the increasingly diverse Western world when it comes to hard race realism. Can you imagine an American father telling his seventeen year old daughter to perhaps have a little suspicion of young black men in hoodies and acting like thugs. It might cause a rift between you and your daughter that might never heal. But at least she'd be less likely to be gang raped for day on end and then fed to alligators.

    Her father should recognize that it was most of all the class issue. He should not let her daughter go out with low class whites either.

    • Replies: @Rurik

    He should not let her daughter go out with low class whites either.
     
    I agree, but what do you do here if you're her father and your teenage daughter is dating this guy?

    https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/jessica-chambers-quinton-tellis.jpeg?quality=65&strip=all&w=780

    When police found her later the night of December 6, 2014, not far from her mother's Courtland home, her car was on fire and Chambers had burns over 98% of her body. She said something to a firefighter -- authorities wouldn't say what -- before she was rushed to a hospital, where she died the next day.


    http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/24/us/jessica-chambers-killing-arrest-mississippi/index.html
  118. @Rurik
    OK JR,

    Since we're usually in agreement, I'll bounce my thoughts on this into the blogosphere..

    This is a brave and powerful article by Mr. Unz. It touches on a verboten subject and eviscerates and holds high the dripping entrails of the Orwellian mendacity enshrouding the length and breath of our entire society, from top to bottom. - That there is a knee-jerk hostility to Western (white) culture and people emanating out of all of our cultural institutions (and especially Hollywood) is so plainly obvious to anyone with eyes and ears that we all just take it for granted.

    That the rape and murder (and horrific treatment) of that teenage white girl wasn't reported in the news isn't going to raise eyebrows anywhere. We all know that's how it works. It's a one way street. If a black person is a victim, (or even if they aren't, as in the case of the Duke "rapists", or Travon, or Michael Brown, etcetera ad nauseam.. ) the media will shriek hysterically for days on end, until the whole world! (literally) knows about the Duke "rapists" or the numinous Travon, with his picture at 12 years old. Obama's son.

    But if it's a white victim, like the young people who died during the Wichita massacre, or Channon Christian and her boyfriend, then no one will have ever heard of them outside the local news.

    It goes like this with every crime and even historical events. Everything is filtered through the sieve of political correctness.

    Have you ever heard of the Holocaust JR? It seems to me there was a movie, or perhaps even two that were made about that event, yet there were over a hundred million victims of communism during the 20th century. Now, I can't remember the names of all those movies they made about the Holodomor (the genocide of white Christians by the millions by starvation). Didn't Steven Spielberg direct and Harvey Weinstein produce that big budget one?

    Have you ever heard about the black slavery that was once practiced in this country JR?

    I think they made a movie about it, if I'm not mistaken. But how many movies have they made about the genocidal treatment of innocent German civilians (who died by the millions after the second war was over). How many movies have they made about the monstrous and historical war crime of Dresden JR?

    Is it possible that our cultural institutions, and the media in particular- are in the hands of a people with a near monolithic contempt (hatred) for all things German? and consider their suffering and deaths by the millions to be of no consequence or concern? Just like the little white girl who is gang raped for days on end and then fed to alligators- when the sub-humans got done with her.

    Indeed, I suspect that right now, reading these words I'm typing, there is a very large percentage of people who're far more 0utraged at my characterization of these savage animals as "sub-humans" than they are at the incomprehensible suffering of that little girl, (and her loved ones). And that is all part of our carefully constructed programming. We're more sensitive to racial epitaphs than to a girl being fed to alligators.

    And all of that is to be expected. Because they don't do what they do for nothing JR. All of our memes and paradigms and narratives that make us all think and feel about events and the world around us are all part of our programming. None of us are born knowing the truth about the world and our place in it. We rely first on our parents and family to understand the world, and then on the media, the print and radio and television, (and only recently the Internet). So if the media, is (and I use the singular present tense verb 'is' deliberately) telling us that most all young, black teenage males are desperately trying to graduate and get their degrees so they can rise above all the racism that permeates our (irredeemably racist) society but then almost always while in their prime, and unarmed and walking around with their hands up and pleading not to get shot at least this one time- by yet another racist white [redundant] man with a gun, (often but not always with a badge too)- then this meme will take hold. It's guaranteed to, and that of course is the point.

    Now just for the record, there are racist white (and black and brown, etc..) men. And there are criminals and thugs and even murderers with guns and badges. But from what I've glimmered, most of America's cops, while being far too arrogant and thuggish, are nominally professionals. And if you, the reader, had to pick between your family's health and well being at the at the mercy of your typical urban young black men in America vs. the police, well then I can tell you that I know the streets, and I know Detroit and Miami, and there are places that they'd cut you to pieces as much as look at you. We get a very skewed version of reality from our msm, than exists in the real world, let me tell ya.

    And what follows is the obvious question why?

    Anyone with two peanuts rolling around in their noggins knows that Jews overwhelmingly own and control our msm. Duh. So the question becomes why do they treat white Americans with such overt hostility? Why are we (especially white, straight, southern, Christian men) always depicted as evil or pathetic- always deplorable? And irredeemable?

    (Perhaps not always, of course. But that is the meme. And we all know it).

    Is this hostility cultural, religious, or something more intractable?

    are the Jews that control our media infused with a deep distrust of white, Christian men - as congenital, if latent Nazis? Is that why they relentlessly foist non-white immigration on all white nations? Are they trying to protect themselves from a future potential holocaust by eliminating the threat in advance? What are the chances they might be creating the threat where none exists- with their 'cure'?

    Anyways, sorry for ruminating here on larger philosophical ramblings, but this article for me brings up important and extremely relevant questions.

    Rurik, you should know by now that I am very fact oriented. I don’t object to your various “philosophical ramblings” mind you, and I suppose I agree with much of it — though not all…. BUT the thing is that my problems with Ron’s article are not philosophical so much as factual issues.

    Most of the comment you are replying to, I am expressing my extreme skepticism about this account of the Zebra murders in the 1970′s. I read the official story and have a very hard time believing that this is what really happened.

    Moreover, Ron makes no mention of things like Cointelpro, and the sheer extent to which any anti-system sort of group from black nationalists to white nationalists were infiltrated by Deep State agents. I mean, probably the main reason that there has been no significant violence from the KKK in the last half century or so is that the group is so entirely infiltrated by Deep State agents that it would be impossible for them to do squat anyway. And, yes, the continued existence of some sort of KKK that never does shit is something useful. It’s just an element of Deep State theater. In the terms of my last article, “it’s part of the show”.

    And then when any of these groups actually do something, I think the baseline assumption should be that it is some sort of sting operation, run by the FBI, say. If tomorrow the KKK came out of their lethargy and lynched some black folks for real, or whatever other act of terrorism, I would immediately wonder whether this is some sort of Deep State psy op. I would reason that these people are so infiltrated by the organs of the State that they can’t really plan and execute anything without the authorities knowing about it.

    Moreover, what you have with these Zebra murders is a narrative in which these Black Muslims are committing all these murders with no real motive. I mean, they just hate white folks, if that’s a motive. And somehow they’re doing this for 6 months straight and the authorities have no idea what is going on…. You know, I see patterns, Rurik. Why did Oswald kill Kennedy? He was a commie? He was fucked up in the head? Bottom line: no motive. Why did Jack Ruby kill Oswald? He wanted to show that “Jews have balls”. Bullshit. Why did James Earl Ray kill Martin Luther King? I looked that one up recently. I assumed that it was ascribed to a racial motive, but no, apparently James Earl Ray killed King to obtain something called “ego gratification”. In other words, he murdered MLK because it would make him feel good about himself. Again, bullshit. No motive.

    Normally when you have a crime, you look for means and motive. All this sequence of crimes where the alleged perpetrators have no motive… it gives off a funny smell to me…

    And all that above stuff is bullshit, right? Oswald, James Earl Ray…. those two guys certainly didn’t kill anybody. Jack Ruby did but it wasn’t to show that Jews have balls.

    So when you tell me that these Zebra murders happened because these people hated white people so much to just kill random white people, alarm bells go off with me, because, over the last few years, I have devoted some energy to studying these false flag terrorism events, like Gladio in Italy and so forth. And I look at these things in Europe more recently, and YES, 9/11…..

    You argue as if I’m saying things I’m not saying. I never said there was no black criminal element and so on and I never contested that the media was under-reporting black on white crimes. You’re arguing as if I was saying things I was not saying.

    The main thing I want to get across is that this Zebra murders narrative is very very strange. Even if it were to turn out (much to my surprise) that the official story on this is true, it is not within the normal run of black on white crimes. I assume the “normal” black on white crime is some thug hitting you over the head and taking your wallet or something. Or they rob a liquor store. Or something. This Zebra murders thing is something very very different. It’s taking something very exceptional and then waving one’s hands and creating generalizations about it. There is something very strange about what Ron is doing in this article. It makes me very uncomfortable on various levels. But primarily, it’s the factual level. I just find this official story on the Zebra murders very hard to believe. It feels to me like there is something else going on here — Cointelpro, Deep State sort of stuff.

    • Replies: @Rurik

    Moreover, what you have with these Zebra murders is a narrative in which these Black Muslims are committing all these murders with no real motive.
     
    this one set my spine into almost a pretzel

    my neck kept on snapping back and doing a WTF over and over, reading the words to make sure they were really written like that, on purpose

    it's almost like you really don't know.. as impossible as that sounds. Wow!

    perhaps if you are that far from living in these "United" States of America, and getting a lot of your info from the same msm that Mr. Unz is talking about in this article, you might, just might be that staggeringly, monumentally, colossally naïve

    talk about duped and swallowing whatever you read or see in the media JR!

    OK, let me explain something to you. Most American black men hate American white men with a burning passion along the lines of ten gazillion super nova stars exploding simultaneously. They simmer with quite rage and festering, roiling murderous loathing. And that's an understatement. You just have no idea.

    Now please understand that I'm not talking about the blacks you see in Hollywood movies, but even some of them are filled to the brim with race hate. Just consider for instance the move Hurricane Carter, about a black man who murdered white men and women out of black racist rage and hate. He was convicted twice for the race motivated murders, but was eventually released because a judge had said race was mentioned at the trial, (of course race was mentioned at the trial, that was the whole motive!!!) But since blacks can never, ever be considered guilty of racial crimes, they let him go. OK, fine. But then Denzel goes on to deify the man as if he were some kind hero, because he shot white people with a shot gun.

    How can I quantify this to you. I'm trying to point out that even our exalted celebrities with millions of dollars and every perk you could imagine hate the white man with a white hot simmering rage.

    Read some of the stuff I've read about Spike Lee. Or that famous jazz musician and trumpet player Miles Davis.

    If somebody told me I only had an hour to live, I'd spend it choking a white man. I'd do it nice and slow.

    and these are famous celebrities that have been given every perk imaginable

    now consider the urban blacks on the streets, having had it hammered in at every moment and opportunity that the white man enslaved their ancestors and raped their great grandmothers and whipped them and beat them mercilessly, and lynched them for the slightest slight. And that even today it's the white man who is holding them down and persecuting them and oppressing them relentlessly. It's almost no wonder that every chance they get they rape white women (often if possible in front of their husbands or boyfriends). It's no wonder that they go around and play knock out game and other assorted racist revenge violence.

    That you're apparently unaware of the pure, raw, murderous hatred that many (not all!) American blacks have for the white man is staggering JR. How else do you rape a man in front of his girlfriend, and then mutilate him and set him on fire, before bringing your attention to the girl, and then gang raping her for days, and torturing her mercilessly, and then when your done, putting her into a garbage bag to suffocate slowly with bleach poured in her face and down her throat? How does a human do that to another (beautiful young) human unless the hatred is demonic, and otherworldly?

    Reminds me of what the Apache used to do to the white man when he got one. And there was hatred there too JR. Only the Apache didn't marinate in 24/7 propaganda blaming all the struggles and strife in the black man's life directly on the white man's eternal and intractable and cruel and unjust racism.

    If you don't think that those early Nation of Islam or Black Panthers hate the white man with a white hot passion, you just haven't lived in the places I have, I suppose. Here's an eloquent fellow:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXG_AqVMM5c

    now I know this guy is not representative of most blacks, but just listen to the raw hate this man has marinated in

    or watch the video of Oprah pining for the day all white people just die

    or the professor that says all white people need to be "exterminated".

    for you to act like blacks would have no motive for killing whites, is well, it's just f'n amazing. I'm almost jealous of your naiveté. I wish I could live somewhere where blacks don't hate whites and pine for the day when they could kill each and every last one of them. Like they did in Haiti. There's a huge percentage of them that would do the exact same thing here JR. That's a certainty.

    now I've ranted and I have to go tend to some things, alas.

    I agree with some of the other points you're making, but I got sidetracked by your utterly bizarre and incomprehensible claim about a lack of motive !
  119. @silly billy
    The case of "white" George Zimmerman and the "innocent" Trayvon Martin is particularly interesting.

    George Zimmerman, in fact, is so dark that wouldn't have looked out of place in any Mexican village and yet the media still chose to describe him as "white." This made this shooting simply another example of "white racism."

    The pictures of George Zimmerman that were taken immediately after the shooting are quite revealing . It took a long time for the first pictures of of the injuries inflicted on Zimmerman to finally come out in the MSM. The first ones that finally appeared showed him after having been treated and cleaned and stitched up by by medical personnel, either at the scene or at an emergency room afterwards.

    In these very sanitized photos we still see some still obvious serious injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head that showed that Martin had apparently been on top of Zimmerman and had been on top of Zimmerman while banging the back of his head into the pavement. No wonder Zimmerman was upset when he shot Trayvon.

    The lack of blood in these pictures however made Zimmerman's injuries appear less serious than they might have been. In fact this picture was finally probably but reluctantly distributed by the media specifically to downplay the actual extent of Zimmerman's injuries.The writer of this comment apparently feels that Zimmerman should have let Martin continue to bang his head on the ground to prove that he wasn't a racist.

    Then, another picture finally suddenly appeared after an even longer delay. It was not distributed by the MSM however, I personally discovered it during an internet search.It showed Zimmerman's head right after the attack and before treatment. The back of his head was absolutely covered in a huge amount of blood, maybe as much as a half or full pint When I first saw it I was reminded me of one of the more gruesome wound you see in war movies.. Trayvon had in fact apparently been beating the hell out of the weak and puggy Zimmerman. Very few people have ever been shown this far bloodier picture since it never appeared in the MSM.. The MSM had totally censored it. This bloody picture was undoubtedly a major factor in Zimmerman being acquitted at his criminal trial.

    Then the question must be what exactly was Zimmerman doing out there in the first place bothering outstanding citizens like Trayvon? Was he walking around just to be mean to black folks?

    Actually , he was a member of a "neighborhood watch" group that was attempting to counter a staggering rise in the number of black on white crimes that were occurring with increasingly frequency against the non black members of the Ferguson community. I seem to remember that there had been over 2400 property crimes and physical attacks in recent times committed n this middle class, racially mixed neighborhood. by the members of the nearby ghetto. I remember reading that some white residents reported having been burglarized five (or more) times over a fairly short period of time . Zimmerman was patrolling simply because of this increasing crime wave was making living in Ferguson for whites simply untenable. The white folks were desperate. Hence the citizen patrols.

    But it was already simply too late, It was increasingly futile and dangerous for him to even be making his patrol rounds and the MSM has now made this futility complete. Now Ferguson has become yet another failed black majority community, sor of like a mini east Oakland. The whites have now apparently disappeared but only after having sold their houses at firesale prices.

    Then the question must be what exactly was Zimmerman doing out there in the first place bothering outstanding citizens like Trayvon? Was he walking around just to be mean to black folks?

    Actually , he was a member of a “neighborhood watch” group that was attempting to counter a staggering rise in the number of black on white crimes that were occurring with increasingly frequency against the non black members of the Ferguson community. I seem to remember that there had been over 2400 property crimes and physical attacks in recent times committed n this middle class, racially mixed neighborhood. by the members of the nearby ghetto. I remember reading that some white residents reported having been burglarized five (or more) times over a fairly short period of time . Zimmerman was patrolling simply because of this increasing crime wave was making living in Ferguson for whites simply untenable. The white folks were desperate. Hence the citizen patrols.

    Ferguson??? Zimmerman and Trayvon were in Sanford, Florida.

    • Replies: @silly billy
    Sorry. My mistake. This is starting to happen frequently that so often I am starting to get my thugs and their abodes mixed up.The figures for the crime rate in Trayvon's and Zimmerman's town are correct however.
  120. @roofgoat
    the data Boris posted is as truthful as the unemployment and inflation data we have been getting for years.

    I don't think that more than a day goes by where I don't see an article buried in the news along the likes of.......Jarvniasious Williams, 28, Quanalitha Moore, 24, N'talah Jenkins, 23, were arrested for the beating, burning, rape and robbery of (white granny) Agatha Proctor, 82.

    Every f'n day this happens but hey, white privilege and BLM.

    The delusion and denial in our country and (the west) is incalculable. There is no longer any excuse to not know exactly what is happening in Obama's America. Sure, the media could fool us years ago with no internet. I too was naïve.

    What I have seen every day is unforgiveable. Yet the power to deny is still heavy in the air.

    Mengele said it best..."the more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it".

    Amazing how that quote applies to those that should know better. Those meaning right leaning, gun owning, Christ believing, US mil loving white guys today.

    the data Boris posted is as truthful as the unemployment and inflation data we have been getting for years.

    Are you kidding? White nationalists love FBI crime data. You mean their love was based on results and not an objective understanding of the methodology and limitations? I’m shocked.

    • Replies: @Randal

    White nationalists love FBI crime data. You mean their love was based on results and not an objective understanding of the methodology and limitations? I’m shocked.
     
    The point, which is directly connected to the situation described in Unz's piece above, is that government data (and most information in most of our mainstream media) can safely be assumed to be subject to colossal bias in provenance, selection and display, intended to favour antiracist (and globalist, but that's another aspect) political interests. So it is wholly reasonable to accept data from such sources when it goes against antiracist interests (and assume it is if anything an understatement of the reality), while regarding it with extreme scepticism when it tends to support them.

    That's the direct and inevitable result of the "pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long " that Unz describes above.

    I understand that you might not like that harsh reality. Complain to the antiracists and globalists who have variously either believed or pretended to believe for decades that such dishonesty was a "noble lie", and continue to do so today.
  121. Donald Trump’s missteps are eagerly reported, but other politicians do not receive the same treatment.

    Justin Webb, a BBC journalist wrote:

    During the decades I have been a BBC reporter, I have interviewed thousands of people: angry people, sad people, political duckers and weavers, serious thinkers — all human life.

    But nothing prepared me for the day after Barack Obama beat Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party presidential nomination in 2008. You might remember it for the balloons and tears of joy inside the building. I remember it for one interview outside.

    ‘How do you feel?’ was my imaginative question. But it was enough. The woman let rip. Ghastly, she said. Devastated. Bitter. In fact, she told me: ‘I was raped as a teenager but I have never felt as violated as I do today.’

    My jaw dropped. We couldn’t use her comments on the news. Too tasteless and offensive, particularly given the racial tinge — the victor being a black man and Hillary a white woman — but those words have stuck with me since.

    The key words are “We couldn’t use her comments on the news.” If they had done so, a whole chain of BBC staff would immediately have lost their jobs. The instinct of the organisation’s leaders to protect senior liberal politicians quickly becomes internalised as self-censorship.

    Whenever I see Donald Trump or Nigel Farage say something foolish in an interview, I remember the BBC man’s story, and I know that if Hillary Clinton says something equally offensive, her comments will never be broadcast.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3441623/Humiliation-Hillary-spouts-feminism-women-say-s-dishonest-bully.html

  122. @Wizard of Oz
    I haven't heard either about Zimmerman being "part Jewish" or the "subsequent crap" so would be pleased to read your elucidation.

    His father is Jewish. It’s a common German and Jewish last name Every Zimmerman I have ever known is a Jew, not a goy of German descent. Of course the few zimnermans I’ve known doesn’t mean much but the family made it clear Dad is Jewish I don’t know in what if any religion they raised the children

    If he had used his Mom’s Spanish name no one except for his town in Florida would have ever heard of the incident

    Someone mentioned Zimmerman was stalking Martin. Actually, Martin was stalking him and there is a cell phone recording to his friend that “Ima gooh geh
    duh muh fughin cracka ” English translation I’m going to get the mother f..king cracker.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Thanks. I had temembered that Zimmer means "room" in German but not, until I did the obvious that Zimmerman(n) means "carpenter". Presuming that Zimmermann wasn't the kind of Getman name forbidden to Jews (amusing that "Liechtenstein" wasn't protected in the Hapsburg territories!) I wasn't surprised to find that it is said to be likely to be Jewish in Israel but German in Kansas. By analogy Florida is with NYC and Woody Allen...
  123. @Sam Shama
    [Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from “Jewish control of media,” nonviolently or to borrow Richard Breitman’s phrase, “semi-legally,”]

    Well wouldn't the straightforward route to that end be purchasing said media enterprises from Jewish hands? Organise a "Jewish Media Buyout Fund".

    Start with Ron Unz. I estimate opening bids at $25m.

    Semi-legal would be an LBO using Nazi Gold.

    Organise a “Jewish Media Buyout Fund”.

    Would this be legal? Can I publish a guide to non-Jewish influenced or owned media? Can I refuse to employ Jews in my media company simply because they are Jews?

  124. @Boris

    In fact, the evidence suggests that the overwhelming majority of all racially-motivated violent attacks in America each year are committed by blacks
     
    This claim isn't supported by your source, which is a Thomas Sowell article that doesn't delve into the statistics at all.

    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014

    In 2014, race was reported for 5,192 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:

    52.0 percent were White.

    23.2 percent were Black or African American.

    in 2014, there were 3,227 victims of racially motivated hate crime.

    62.7 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Black or African American bias.

    22.7 percent were victims of anti-White bias.
     
    Now, this data isn't perfect. Certainly not all racially motivated attacks will be labelled as hate crimes. But there is no evidence here that blacks commit more racially motivated attacks, let alone the "overwhelming majority" of them.

    This claim isn’t supported by your source, which is a Thomas Sowell article that doesn’t delve into the statistics at all.

    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014

    LOL. Oh, excuuuuuuse me. The ‘hate-crime stats’, you say? Har, har, har, har, har. You mean the small number of crimes that are defined as “hate crimes” by law-enforcement under media pressure?

    Just look up the plain-vanilla violent crime stats, pal. Blacks commit violent crime at a rate TEN TIMES HIGHER than that of whites. And that’s using stats padded with Mexicans as “white”.

    • Replies: @Boris

    LOL. Oh, excuuuuuuse me. The ‘hate-crime stats’, you say? Har, har, har, har, har. You mean the small number of crimes that are defined as “hate crimes” by law-enforcement under media pressure?
     
    Evidence?


    Just look up the plain-vanilla violent crime stats, pal. Blacks commit violent crime at a rate TEN TIMES HIGHER than that of whites.
     
    We're talking interracial crime, chief.

    16% (446/2651) of black murderers killed white victims.
    8% (187/2675) of white murderers killed black victims.

    There doesn't appear to be any targeting in those numbers. If blacks were randomly selecting victims, ~70% would be white. So relying on "but..but..VIOLENT CRIME THO!" doesn't substantiate your claim. There's in no evidence for hate crimes in those numbers.
  125. Mr Unz

    Very brave essay you are no doubt correct in your facts and reasonable in your assertion the media may be lying far far far more than we even we skeptics suspect.I understand you are a ‘liberal’ of the variety rare but still existing that can be persuaded by evidence.Still to have dared weighed the evidence enough to have written this was fearless I myself a natural race realist as NY city natives are without rancor and as a conservative since my early twenties i was numb with shock rage disbelief and terror of what the implications were, when i finally came to understand the true racial situation in our nation. suffice it to say youre toast, its one thing to host a blogsite with dissident perspectives quite another to question the sainted black martyrs like till martin and brown. For what its worth I think youre right its highly unlikely mrs Bryant ran for a gun because a negro whistled, which means just about everyone was lying about what happened. Its equally unlikely a week later her husband would murder a 14 year old for a whistle in fact its really unlikely he would have been told about a mere whistle a week later.The fact of the matter is white fear of black violence and sexual predation was not some mental aberration of southern whites as we have been told but a problem going back before the civil war.
    well maybe if liberals are even waking up there is hope, hope we will survive i can see no hope that this will not get worse before better

  126. @Randal

    Undoubtedly? It seems you are just making things up to support your conclusions.
     
    "Undoubtedly" clearly indicates that it's my opinion. You might well think, or claim to think, that whites are as likely to report a crime against them as "racist" as blacks, but obviously I (and I think most honest and informed folks) would regard such a claim as, frankly, pretty silly.

    We are trying to deduce the number of “racially motivated violent attacks” here, and it makes no sense to assume that white people are just not reporting them.
     
    No, what is likely is that whites are reporting the crimes just as robberies, aggravated assaults, etc, whereas blacks are doing their usual "victim of whitey" thing and reporting such things as racist (including when the whole thing is made up - see the well established phenomenon of hate hoaxes).

    I (and I think most honest and informed folks) would regard such a claim as, frankly, pretty silly.

    Informed? What information are you talking about?

    No, what is likely is that whites are reporting the crimes just as robberies, aggravated assaults, etc,

    So white people are withholding evidence of hate crimes? When they give their statements, they are leaving out details intentionally? That doesn’t make much sense.

    whereas blacks are doing their usual “victim of whitey” thing and reporting such things as racist

    Well, first this seems to be built from nothing but your own prejudice. But also you don’t seem to understand how crimes are reported and prosecuted. Nobody goes in and reports things as “racist” or “not racist.” They give their statements, evidence is collected and police and DAs decide what charges to file.

    I still see no real evidence for Unz’s claim.

    • Replies: @Randal

    Informed? What information are you talking about?

     

    Information that has not been warped by the “pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long ” that Unz describes above.

    So white people are withholding evidence of hate crimes? When they give their statements, they are leaving out details intentionally? That doesn’t make much sense.
     
    When white people are attacked by negroes they probably pay little or no attention to being called "honky" or "cracka" or whatever the modern form of abuse is, and either don't report it or downplay it significantly. Whites are only just starting to be fully trained in the arts of race grievance-mongering, as blacks have been schooled for generations. In the rare cases when black people are violently attacked by whites, they undoubtedly will make huge play of any use of terms like "nigger", and so will the people recording the crime. They are also quite likely to make up such use (see aforementioned hate hoaxes) because they know it will gain them greater sympathy and perhaps get bigger punishments for the person they've had an altercation with.

    Well, first this seems to be built from nothing but your own prejudice. But also you don’t seem to understand how crimes are reported and prosecuted. Nobody goes in and reports things as “racist” or “not racist.” They give their statements, evidence is collected and police and DAs decide what charges to file.
     
    See above.

    I still see no real evidence for Unz’s claim.
     
    Unsurprising. Granted, Unz hasn't substantiated it with hard evidence. As far as I'm concerned it's you who needs to find the evidence to contradict such a common sense assertion.
    , @vinteuil
    A few years ago, I posted an article at Richard Spencer's original Alt-Right site, in which I demonstrated, based entirely on government statistics, that blacks commit "hate crimes" against whites about ten times more frequently than the other way 'round.

    In other words, the usual, predictable ratio of black vs. white crime.

    If I dug it up again, would you read it?

    Or you could look it all up yourself. The important point is that you have to look at the NCVS - the National Crime Victimization Survey - and not the FBI stats.
  127. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/09/14/midtown-women-set-on-fire/

    Get this. Black boy sets muslim woman on fire. It is called a hate crime. But then, the guy and other(s)? tried to set other women on fire.

    This is now a hate crime against women. Is this a first? First time I ever heard of it.

    Blacks need to wise up. Intersectionality is going to bite them in the ass. Tony Parker is a rapist, so it is black oppression against rape — but the especially heinous crime of raping a college girl who he knew and dated.

    Whites might be privileged and immune from hate crimes, but we are a nation of nations, and there is a long line of victims and some of them are pushing toward the front. A lot of black males aren’t too keen on LGBT victimhood, but they better get used to be a minority among minorities.

    Women might want to get on board and start telling the truth about the race of rape perpetuators. If they care. I don’t know. Drunken college sex is a problem. But that isn’t why rape used to be a capital crime. It was reserved for someone that was hit over the head on the street by a stranger.

    The feminist rhetoric about the judicial system punishing women who pursue sexual assault charges — especially 60 years ago — might have some sympathy for why there was extra judicial attempts to address it.

  128. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    youre wrong trayvon was sent to his dads because he had one assaulted a bus driver, two been caught with stolen jewelry and burglar tools in his school locker, three assaulted another student four been all over social media posing with drugs and guns gang signs and messaging about how to buy pills and make the drug lean/drizz etc, his autopsy showed extensive liver damage do to lean use, he was in fact that night buying the ingrediants to make lean and to use marijuanna. so basically zimmermans instincts were spot on trayvon was a violent drug addict casing the hood to more burglaries he may have even been responsible for some that had been going on. zimmerman was a licenced firearm carrier, neighborhood watch. he called 911 and stayed back trayvon spotted him and confronted him and attacked him and tried to kill him. the baby pictures of trayvon are agitprop. the reality i outlined is well documented but completely suppressed.

  129. @David In TN
    "Mr. Unz left out a lot of the most damning information presented in the book he cites."

    Absolutely. The so-called Zebra case was far worse than most people who have heard of it know. In October 1973, there was a meeting of California law enforcement officials in which it was determined over 70 white people had been killed in California in the last 2 years or so by Nation of Islam members. This was before the San Francisco "Zebra murders" had begun.

    Thomas Peele's recent book, "Killing the Messenger," about the murder of black journalist Chauncey Bailey, has a chapter on the Zebra murders. Peele tells of the "East Bay killings" taking place at the same time, which were run out a mosque in Oakland. It is believed there were 30 white victims in the East Bay, none were solved. Peele indicates the mosques in San Francisco and Oakland were in league with each other.

    There were killings in Sacramento in 1974. In this one, two NOI members were convicted. Both were paroled a few years ago after admitting their guilt and expressing remorse. One said higher-ups in the NOI had held meetings instructing them to kill white people.

    One said higher-ups in the NOI had held meetings instructing them to kill white people.

    It’s a very strange narrative. Did they allege a motive for this?

  130. Anon says:     Show CommentNext New Comment

    Zimmerman is a trouble magnet.

    We have all known someone that is never content to live without being involved in conflict.

    Why bother with Travon. There are better examples. There is room for objective people to disagree.

    • Replies: @Randal

    Why bother with Travon. There are better examples. There is room for objective people to disagree.
     
    The advantage of the Trayvon Martin case is that it is very high profile, and almost everyone can directly recall the active mendacity of almost all the mainstream media in deliberately mis-portraying him as an innocent-looking child long after they knew better.

    There is no room for honest objective people to disagree about that straightforward fact, which directly supports Unz's point about a “pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long ”.
  131. @deplorable frog
    its true that Zimmerman should have "backed down", but there was no reason for Martin to assault him. If someone follows you from a distance, you don't turn around and deliberately confront them, and then attack them

    that kind of terrible judgement, and the subsequent details of Martin's life revealed through the fiasco showed that Martin really was a low-life thug and a criminal waiting to happen, and that Zimmerman's instincts about Martin being trouble were correct from the beginning.

    You are a victim of the aforementioned media brainwashing.
    It took weeks for the true story to be released. By then, everyone had been told the lie and for weeks seen the pic of the 12 year old Trayvonn.
    In fact, I bet when you hear the name (Trayvonn) this is the image you see in your head,
    NOT the gold toothed, tattooed, gangster photographed with his gun and loot from a robbery.

  132. all listed by name, drawn from the combined decades of the 1950s and 1960s, which represented the height of the Klan’s modern power.

    The 1920s marked the Klan’s 2oth century apogee.

  133. @Boris

    the data Boris posted is as truthful as the unemployment and inflation data we have been getting for years.
     
    Are you kidding? White nationalists love FBI crime data. You mean their love was based on results and not an objective understanding of the methodology and limitations? I'm shocked.

    White nationalists love FBI crime data. You mean their love was based on results and not an objective understanding of the methodology and limitations? I’m shocked.

    The point, which is directly connected to the situation described in Unz’s piece above, is that government data (and most information in most of our mainstream media) can safely be assumed to be subject to colossal bias in provenance, selection and display, intended to favour antiracist (and globalist, but that’s another aspect) political interests. So it is wholly reasonable to accept data from such sources when it goes against antiracist interests (and assume it is if anything an understatement of the reality), while regarding it with extreme scepticism when it tends to support them.

    That’s the direct and inevitable result of the “pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long ” that Unz describes above.

    I understand that you might not like that harsh reality. Complain to the antiracists and globalists who have variously either believed or pretended to believe for decades that such dishonesty was a “noble lie”, and continue to do so today.

  134. @Boris

    I (and I think most honest and informed folks) would regard such a claim as, frankly, pretty silly.
     
    Informed? What information are you talking about?


    No, what is likely is that whites are reporting the crimes just as robberies, aggravated assaults, etc,
     
    So white people are withholding evidence of hate crimes? When they give their statements, they are leaving out details intentionally? That doesn't make much sense.


    whereas blacks are doing their usual “victim of whitey” thing and reporting such things as racist
     
    Well, first this seems to be built from nothing but your own prejudice. But also you don't seem to understand how crimes are reported and prosecuted. Nobody goes in and reports things as "racist" or "not racist." They give their statements, evidence is collected and police and DAs decide what charges to file.

    I still see no real evidence for Unz's claim.

    Informed? What information are you talking about?

    Information that has not been warped by the “pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long ” that Unz describes above.

    So white people are withholding evidence of hate crimes? When they give their statements, they are leaving out details intentionally? That doesn’t make much sense.

    When white people are attacked by negroes they probably pay little or no attention to being called “honky” or “cracka” or whatever the modern form of abuse is, and either don’t report it or downplay it significantly. Whites are only just starting to be fully trained in the arts of race grievance-mongering, as blacks have been schooled for generations. In the rare cases when black people are violently attacked by whites, they undoubtedly will make huge play of any use of terms like “nigger”, and so will the people recording the crime. They are also quite likely to make up such use (see aforementioned hate hoaxes) because they know it will gain them greater sympathy and perhaps get bigger punishments for the person they’ve had an altercation with.

    Well, first this seems to be built from nothing but your own prejudice. But also you don’t seem to understand how crimes are reported and prosecuted. Nobody goes in and reports things as “racist” or “not racist.” They give their statements, evidence is collected and police and DAs decide what charges to file.

    See above.

    I still see no real evidence for Unz’s claim.

    Unsurprising. Granted, Unz hasn’t substantiated it with hard evidence. As far as I’m concerned it’s you who needs to find the evidence to contradict such a common sense assertion.

    • Replies: @Boris

    overnment data (and most information in most of our mainstream media) can safely be assumed to be subject to colossal bias in provenance, selection and display, intended to favour antiracist (and globalist, but that’s another aspect) political interests.
     
    This isn't a safe assumption at all. It assumes a conspiracy not in evidence. After all, the things you now know about the Trayvon Martin case and the Michael Brown case came from the media and the government that you say is untrustworthy.

    So it is wholly reasonable to accept data from such sources when it goes against antiracist interests
     
    That's not the way reason works. All you are doing is proclaiming a conspiracy and then choosing to believe what makes you happy. You can replace "antiracist" with anything and come up with the same illogical argument. The government is antipickles, so I know that when I hear bad things about pickles, those are the lies, and when I hear good things about pickles, that is the truth. Yum, pickles! But, honestly, this kind of faulty reasoning is probably why you're a racist in the first place.

    Whites are only just starting to be fully trained in the arts of race grievance-mongering, as blacks have been schooled for generations.
     
    Don't downplay white people's genetic talents for "grievance-mongering." They go to the Supreme Court over a middling student not getting into her first choice of law school. Of course, black people had actual grievances, you know.

    As far as I’m concerned it’s you who needs to find the evidence to contradict such a common sense assertion.
     
    Ah, yes, common sense. The flat-earthers appeal to that too.
  135. @John Jeremiah Smith

    This claim isn’t supported by your source, which is a Thomas Sowell article that doesn’t delve into the statistics at all.

    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014
     
    LOL. Oh, excuuuuuuse me. The 'hate-crime stats', you say? Har, har, har, har, har. You mean the small number of crimes that are defined as "hate crimes" by law-enforcement under media pressure?

    Just look up the plain-vanilla violent crime stats, pal. Blacks commit violent crime at a rate TEN TIMES HIGHER than that of whites. And that's using stats padded with Mexicans as "white".

    LOL. Oh, excuuuuuuse me. The ‘hate-crime stats’, you say? Har, har, har, har, har. You mean the small number of crimes that are defined as “hate crimes” by law-enforcement under media pressure?

    Evidence?

    Just look up the plain-vanilla violent crime stats, pal. Blacks commit violent crime at a rate TEN TIMES HIGHER than that of whites.

    We’re talking interracial crime, chief.

    16% (446/2651) of black murderers killed white victims.
    8% (187/2675) of white murderers killed black victims.

    There doesn’t appear to be any targeting in those numbers. If blacks were randomly selecting victims, ~70% would be white. So relying on “but..but..VIOLENT CRIME THO!” doesn’t substantiate your claim. There’s in no evidence for hate crimes in those numbers.

    • Replies: @John Jeremiah Smith

    We’re talking interracial crime, chief.

    16% (446/2651) of black murderers killed white victims.
    8% (187/2675) of white murderers killed black victims.

    There doesn’t appear to be any targeting in those numbers. If blacks were randomly selecting victims, ~70% would be white. So relying on “but..but..VIOLENT CRIME THO!” doesn’t substantiate your claim. There’s in no evidence for hate crimes in those numbers.
     
    Ah, I see. The FBI now politically-correctifies its statistics. I just checked through what the FBI now posts online as "statistics". Typical government scumbaggery. Too bad.

    Up through 2013, the on-line FBI crime tables contained some amount of breakdown by race, usually as Tables 43A through 67C. I have copies of them. Probably won't copy/paste into this comment space, but, let me try ... see below, not so good. That is a copy of Excel spreadsheet columns A1-M39.

    I have spreadsheets for 17 FBI tables having some, but somewhat mixed, race stats for 2013. I guess I kinda had a feeling that PC would come to the, er, people's national law-enforcement agency.

    Table 55A
    Arrests
    Metropolitan Counties
    by Race, 2013
    [1,374 agencies; 2013 estimated population 57,208,460]
    Offense charged Total arrests Percent distribution1
    Race
    Total White "Black or
    African
    American" "American
    Indian or
    Alaska
    Native" Asian "Native
    Hawaiian
    or Other
    Pacific
    Islander" Total White "Black or
    African
    American" "American
    Indian or
    Alaskan
    Native" Asian "Native
    Hawaiian
    or Other
    Pacific
    Islander"
    TOTAL 1,693,094 1,230,918 425,496 13,587 21,751 1,342 100.0 72.7 25.1 0.8 1.3 0.1
    Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter 1,607 929 647 10 20 1 100.0 57.8 40.3 0.6 1.2 0.1
    Rape3 2,433 1,818 576 13 24 2 100.0 74.7 23.7 0.5 1.0 0.1
    Robbery 9,856 4,574 5,134 39 99 10 100.0 46.4 52.1 0.4 1.0 0.1
    Aggravated assault 55,370 38,958 15,194 480 665 73 100.0 70.4 27.4 0.9 1.2 0.1
    Burglary 38,997 29,270 9,172 183 342 30 100.0 75.1 23.5 0.5 0.9 0.1
    Larceny-theft 130,507 88,508 39,426 707 1,796 70 100.0 67.8 30.2 0.5 1.4 0.1
    Motor vehicle theft 10,130 7,758 2,126 76 148 22 100.0 76.6 21.0 0.8 1.5 0.2
    Arson 1,340 1,054 236 16 32 2 100.0 78.7 17.6 1.2 2.4 0.1
    Violent crime4 69,266 46,279 21,551 542 808 86 100.0 66.8 31.1 0.8 1.2 0.1
    Property crime4 180,974 126,590 50,960 982 2,318 124 100.0 69.9 28.2 0.5 1.3 0.1
    Other assaults 160,541 115,504 42,191 1,140 1,621 85 100.0 71.9 26.3 0.7 1.0 0.1
    Forgery and counterfeiting 9,908 6,201 3,532 33 137 5 100.0 62.6 35.6 0.3 1.4 0.1
    Fraud 26,284 17,971 7,896 157 256 4 100.0 68.4 30.0 0.6 1.0 *
    Embezzlement 2,404 1,468 905 9 21 1 100.0 61.1 37.6 0.4 0.9 *
    Stolen property; buying, receiving, possessing 15,152 10,861 4,084 75 125 7 100.0 71.7 27.0 0.5 0.8 *
    Vandalism 28,150 21,214 6,414 249 261 12 100.0 75.4 22.8 0.9 0.9 *
    Weapons; carrying, possessing, etc. 18,484 12,258 5,939 74 186 27 100.0 66.3 32.1 0.4 1.0 0.1
    Prostitution and commercialized vice 3,318 1,916 1,146 29 223 4 100.0 57.7 34.5 0.9 6.7 0.1
    Sex offenses (except rape and prostitution) 9,696 7,771 1,746 66 110 3 100.0 80.1 18.0 0.7 1.1 *
    Drug abuse violations 237,935 174,210 59,636 1,204 2,693 192 100.0 73.2 25.1 0.5 1.1 0.1
    Gambling 721 393 193 7 122 6 100.0 54.5 26.8 1.0 16.9 0.8
    Offenses against the family and children 31,065 18,290 12,465 174 135 1 100.0 58.9 40.1 0.6 0.4 *
    Driving under the influence 227,077 191,702 28,277 1,358 5,441 299 100.0 84.4 12.5 0.6 2.4 0.1
    Liquor laws 35,568 31,091 3,419 529 523 6 100.0 87.4 9.6 1.5 1.5 *
    Drunkenness 34,919 29,924 4,228 355 369 43 100.0 85.7 12.1 1.0 1.1 0.1
    Disorderly conduct 43,164 27,607 14,851 355 345 6 100.0 64.0 34.4 0.8 0.8 *
    Vagrancy 2,024 1,537 455 12 18 2 100.0 75.9 22.5 0.6 0.9 0.1
    All other offenses (except traffic) 553,863 386,456 154,885 6,220 5,886 416 100.0 69.8 28.0 1.1 1.1 0.1
    Suspicion 43 36 7 0 0 0 100.0 83.7 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Curfew and loitering law violations 2,538 1,639 716 17 153 13 100.0 64.6 28.2 0.7 6.0 0.5
  136. @Anon
    Zimmerman is a trouble magnet.

    We have all known someone that is never content to live without being involved in conflict.

    Why bother with Travon. There are better examples. There is room for objective people to disagree.

    Why bother with Travon. There are better examples. There is room for objective people to disagree.

    The advantage of the Trayvon Martin case is that it is very high profile, and almost everyone can directly recall the active mendacity of almost all the mainstream media in deliberately mis-portraying him as an innocent-looking child long after they knew better.

    There is no room for honest objective people to disagree about that straightforward fact, which directly supports Unz’s point about a “pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long ”.

  137. @Boris

    I (and I think most honest and informed folks) would regard such a claim as, frankly, pretty silly.
     
    Informed? What information are you talking about?


    No, what is likely is that whites are reporting the crimes just as robberies, aggravated assaults, etc,
     
    So white people are withholding evidence of hate crimes? When they give their statements, they are leaving out details intentionally? That doesn't make much sense.


    whereas blacks are doing their usual “victim of whitey” thing and reporting such things as racist
     
    Well, first this seems to be built from nothing but your own prejudice. But also you don't seem to understand how crimes are reported and prosecuted. Nobody goes in and reports things as "racist" or "not racist." They give their statements, evidence is collected and police and DAs decide what charges to file.

    I still see no real evidence for Unz's claim.

    A few years ago, I posted an article at Richard Spencer’s original Alt-Right site, in which I demonstrated, based entirely on government statistics, that blacks commit “hate crimes” against whites about ten times more frequently than the other way ’round.

    In other words, the usual, predictable ratio of black vs. white crime.

    If I dug it up again, would you read it?

    Or you could look it all up yourself. The important point is that you have to look at the NCVS – the National Crime Victimization Survey – and not the FBI stats.

    • Replies: @roofgoat
    Bill Whittle on Racial Violence

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGTUcS-yQtQ
    , @Wanderer
    Who cares about Boris.

    Why don't you post the link for the rest of us to read?
  138. @gwynedd1
    If that father waited until 17 to tell her about how race works, its too late. At the individual level, and at the individual context, its statistical noise. At the group level it matters. White individuals around blacks are in a higher state of danger, relatively speaking. Circumstances may arise that blacks would be in danger around whites(prison for example). Latinos also may be at risk. This has nothing to do with individuals one may know. Hell even STI risk is much higher.

    More or less one does not need to make it a black thing . Does he have a dad? If he did, and he was raised in a middle class neighborhood , then he probably isn't really a statistical risk anyway. What's his GPA? There is a kid having issues in my kid's class, bullying and the like. He has a single mama, and no daddy around. A black guy with a dad and a good GPA is going to be better than a random white from the docks.

    A black guy with a dad and a good GPA is going to be better than a random white from the docks.

    well, I’d certainly prefer my daughter date a young Ben Carson over a young Charles Manson, but all things being what they are, if I saw those two young men in the photos coming to get my daughter, I suspect there’d be lead in the air before she’d be driving off with those two.

    The reason blacks present a greater threat to specifically white folks is because of their bile-dripping thug-life culture + having marinated in a toxic stew of media spun lies about all the terrible things white people have and are doing to them to keep them down. It (deliberately) creates hatred, and that hatred often expresses itself in horrible ways. And then, there’s an argument for wondering if blacks are just more violent and primitive than whites in general. Actually I think that may be one of their charms to the ladies. No girl wants a pasty, namby-pamby do-gooder. But then again all too often gals dance with the devil and get burned.

    But anyways, yea, a decent black (or brown or yellow or whatever) fella is always going to be better than a white scumbag. But a father always should want the best for his little princesses, no?

    • Replies: @gwynedd1
    In statistics the rule is that when you can find no correlation, always predict the mean.

    At the level of a large population , odds of bad things happening to your daughter are higher with blacks, certainly . However , you should not be in the position to predict the mean. You should always know the specifics ans she should already know from a young age that without your guidance there are consequences. If you are just going to rely on the the statistics of race and when she is already a teenager, you have already gone very wrong. A passport and a library card would screen better than race.
  139. Anonymous says:     Show CommentNext New Comment
    @MQ
    Yes, I wondered why Ron didn't look up the easily available statistics on lynchings. About 3,400 of those lynchings were of black people -- a number far higher than the 15 murders he ascribes to the KKK. It doesn't justify some of the other reality distortions he mentions, but it gives a much better understanding of how violence was used to uphold the old Southern system.

    Once again for you math-ignorant working-class idiots. Now try to follow along.

    34oo divided by 77 (1882 – 1959) years equals 44 lynchings per year. According to the census, in 1880 there were 7.5 million blacks in the USA. In 1960, 18.9 million. That’s a mean average (good enough for our purposes) of 13.2 million blacks per year of whom 44 were lynched which works out to 1 out of 300,000 blacks lynched per year.

    Now, given that black males commit murder, rape, armed robbery, assault and burglary at the world’s highest rates (in multiples of tens per 100,000), are you trying to make the argument that none of those thugs deserved to be lynched? For murder alone there would be roughly 60 black perpetrators per year. Throw in rape and armed robbery or assault and the number of perpetrators skyrockets into the hundreds. If anything, whites have been far too lenient on black males.

    This year, 1 out of 8400 Americans will be killed in automobile accidents. Thus, the likelihood of a black person’s having been lynched in any year was 36 times less than of his being killed in an auto accident today.

    Try to educate yourself so that you can acquire a sense of perspective. The world makes much more sense when you see the big picture.

    • Replies: @Gail

    34oo divided by 77 (1882 – 1959) years equals 44 lynchings per year. According to the census, in 1880 there were 7.5 million blacks in the USA. In 1960, 18.9 million. That’s a mean average (good enough for our purposes) of 13.2 million blacks per year of whom 44 were lynched which works out to 1 out of 300,000 blacks lynched per year.

    Now, given that black males commit murder, rape, armed robbery, assault and burglary at the world’s highest rates (in multiples of tens per 100,000), are you trying to make the argument that none of those thugs deserved to be lynched? For murder alone there would be roughly 60 black perpetrators per year. Throw in rape and armed robbery or assault and the number of perpetrators skyrockets into the hundreds. If anything, whites have been far too lenient on black males.
     

    Here's where your logic breaks down. You're using recent and current crime rates of blacks to make inferences about their crime rates between 1882 and 1959. It's well-known that crime rates among blacks skyrocketed after the civil rights era. So these numbers are probably a gross overestimate of pre-civil rights crime rates among blacks. Is it so hard to accept that some of the lynched blacks may have been innocent, or may not have deserved punishments as severe as lynching? And I love how you add in rape/armed robbery/assault to the numbers, as though execution by lynching is a perfectly justifiable punishment for these crimes.
    , @Anonymous
    Reply to my own post. A correction.

    At the rate blacks commit murder today, (approximately 6000 per 42 million) by extrapolation, blacks would have murdered an average of 2000 persons per year over the time period in question, not 60 as I mistakenly posted. Of that 2000, 44 were hung, or, roughly 1 out of 45 murderers were strung up in rough frontier justice. This is a remarkably low ratio and testifies to the native decency, forbearance and reasonableness of White Americans. It is a record we can all be proud of.
  140. @roofgoat
    the data Boris posted is as truthful as the unemployment and inflation data we have been getting for years.

    I don't think that more than a day goes by where I don't see an article buried in the news along the likes of.......Jarvniasious Williams, 28, Quanalitha Moore, 24, N'talah Jenkins, 23, were arrested for the beating, burning, rape and robbery of (white granny) Agatha Proctor, 82.

    Every f'n day this happens but hey, white privilege and BLM.

    The delusion and denial in our country and (the west) is incalculable. There is no longer any excuse to not know exactly what is happening in Obama's America. Sure, the media could fool us years ago with no internet. I too was naïve.

    What I have seen every day is unforgiveable. Yet the power to deny is still heavy in the air.

    Mengele said it best..."the more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it".

    Amazing how that quote applies to those that should know better. Those meaning right leaning, gun owning, Christ believing, US mil loving white guys today.

    Mengele said it best…”the more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it”.

    I googled that quote. Among the links on the first page was one to the project of Ms. Rene Brown’s Language Arts class at Peters Township middle school.

    The student-writers posted their references — almost all to websites, except for notes from Ms. Brown’s lectures. The Mengele quote was sourced to http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote/joseph_mengele_quote_e5e2

    The student writing contained numerous spelling and grammar errors, but hey, they’re just 12- and 13- year olds (or were 6 years ago; now they’re old enough to vote).

    Here’s what else they had to say about Dr. Mengele:

    He killed women with injections that caused horrible pain, stomach spasms, and bleeding (Auschwitz). Dr. Herta Oberhauser also came to Auschwitz (Auschwtiz). She worked mostly with adults. She gave them oil injections, took out main organs, and threw sawdust and chipped glass into open wounds (Auschwitz).

    . . .

     Josef Mengele was always the fist doctor that was called when an “experiment” needed to be done (The Holocaust). He preformed untrained spinal surgery, body dissection, and twin sketches on his patients (Auschwitz). The get his experimental bodies he went into the barracks and offered clothes and candy to people (Auschwitz). Then he took them personally to the laboratory (Auschwitz). He mostly experimented on the children rather than the adults (Auschwitz).
    . . .
    Tortures were only done to amuse people . . .to find cheaper and easier ways to kill people.

    Of special interest was Ms. Brown’s students’ mention of Mengele’s experiments on twins:

     When a pair of twins was found they would be killed at the exact same time to keep the body cycle in sync (Auschwitz). Mengele then dissected each twin personally because he liked to sketch every part of their bodies exactly (Auschwitz). Josef Mengele did numerous tests to see how the twins reacted (Gates). He put dye in their eyes to attempt to change their eye color (Gates). Mengele stated, “The more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it”(Dr. Joseph Mengele). He was almost fanatical about drawing and exchanging blood (The Holocaust). The victims were usually left without bandages and died because of infection if they did not die during the experiment (The Holocaust). If the victims did not die during or after the experiment cycle they were killed (Auschwitz).

    I find this passage interesting because it is very similar to the conversation an 86-year old holocaust survivor had with an interviewer on NPR last year. The occasion was the trial of a 93-year old German man on trial as an accomplice to murder based on his work as a baggage handler at trains to concentration camps. The woman said she had been contacted by legal staff in the prosecution of the German. She said that she and her twin sister were at Auschwitz, where she became very ill. “Dr. Mengele stood by my bed and said I would die in two or three days. I was determined not to die because if I died he would kill my twin sister.”

    No doubt it was her “determination not to die” rather than the care she received in the hospital at Auschwitz that accounts for her survival to the fine age of 86, still healthy enough to travel to Europe to participate in the prosecution of a 93-year old baggage handler. (He was convicted and sentenced to prison.)

    What happens when the 12- to 14-year old students in Ms. Brown’s class grow up? They posted on the world wide web, in about 2009:

    Around eleven million people were killed during the Holocaust. Six million of the people killed were Jewish and killed just because it was possible. The other five million people were non-Jews. They were killed because Hitler did not want them in his perfect race. His perfect race was known as the Aryian [sic] race. They were either killed on the spot or taken to death camps to suffer. In death camps people were killed by gassing, starvation, shooting, disease, burning, and any other way that was thought of. [emphasis theirs]

    Do they ever challenge these claims?

    They wrote:

    When prisioners [sic] first arrived in death camps, they were killed on the spot or sent straight to the gas chambers unless they were fit to work (The Holocaust). They would be forced into the gas chambers or just shot on the spot (Gates). They could also die of starvation, disease, shooting, and burning (Auschwitz). The gas chambers were used to exterminate large sums of people using Zyklon-B gas (The Holocaust). Jews, gypsies, Soviet POWs and other prisoners were all killed (The Holocaust). If the prisioners [sic] were fit to work they would receive [sic] hard and pointless jobs (Auschwitz). Ms. Brown stated, “Some of the jobs were even assisting in the killings of  their friends and family”(Brown).  Some prisioners were also killed through brutal medical experiments.

    Ron Unz wrote:

    “We naively tend to assume that our media accurately reflects the events of our world and its history, but instead what we all too often see are only the tremendously distorted images of a circus fun-house mirror, with small items sometimes transformed into large ones, and large ones into small. The contours of historical reality may be warped into almost unrecognizable shapes, with some important elements completely disappearing from the record and others appearing out of nowhere. I’ve often suggested that the media creates our reality, but given such glaring omissions and distortions, the reality produced is often largely fictional. Our standard histories have always criticized the ludicrous Soviet propaganda during the height of Stalin’s purges or the Ukrainian famine, but in its own way, our own media organs sometimes seem just as dishonest and absurd in their own reporting.”

    Does the same apply to America’s teachers?

    What happens when our young people — those then-13-year olds, now 19- to 20-year olds– discover that “the historical reality” they learned in Ms. Brown’s 3rd Period Language Arts class at Peters Township Middle School (a Blue Ribbon School!) was “warped into almost unrecognizable shapes . . . dishonest and absurd . . .”

    Does the same pattern that Unz claimed applies to media, apply also to the public education system in the US?

    “A pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long produces obvious consequences. On a whole range of issues, certainly including racial ones, [as well as claims about Nazis and holocaust] the American media education system may be fast approaching the point of possessing negative credibility, with increasing numbers of people tending to assume that the facts may be exactly opposite to what the media their teachers claim.”

    Several years ago Jeremy ben Ami, founder of J-Street, spoke about a book he had just written, about the I-P conflict. In the audience was a man who teaches Ben Ami’s children. That teacher asked, “What shall we teach our children?”

    ben Ami acknowledged that the question had very personal import.
    He answered the question: “We must tell them the truth, otherwise there will be resentment.”
    ben Ami’s voice trailed off and the book event ended.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?301263-1/new-voice-israel

    Who is going to tell Rene Brown’s 3rd Period Literary Arts class that they were lied to, and how will they react?

    (And who is going to tell them that they really ought to spell-check their work.)

    • Replies: @roofgoat
    Solonto, my quote regarding Mengele has nothing to do with him being the monster he was - it is a quote that sheds light on the power of denial. And it applies to ALL people, not just jews WW2 Germany.

    Thus my point later in that post stating those that should know better what is going on today are just as in a strong state of denial. It's just a slower boil.
  141. @Randal

    Informed? What information are you talking about?

     

    Information that has not been warped by the “pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long ” that Unz describes above.

    So white people are withholding evidence of hate crimes? When they give their statements, they are leaving out details intentionally? That doesn’t make much sense.
     
    When white people are attacked by negroes they probably pay little or no attention to being called "honky" or "cracka" or whatever the modern form of abuse is, and either don't report it or downplay it significantly. Whites are only just starting to be fully trained in the arts of race grievance-mongering, as blacks have been schooled for generations. In the rare cases when black people are violently attacked by whites, they undoubtedly will make huge play of any use of terms like "nigger", and so will the people recording the crime. They are also quite likely to make up such use (see aforementioned hate hoaxes) because they know it will gain them greater sympathy and perhaps get bigger punishments for the person they've had an altercation with.

    Well, first this seems to be built from nothing but your own prejudice. But also you don’t seem to understand how crimes are reported and prosecuted. Nobody goes in and reports things as “racist” or “not racist.” They give their statements, evidence is collected and police and DAs decide what charges to file.
     
    See above.

    I still see no real evidence for Unz’s claim.
     
    Unsurprising. Granted, Unz hasn't substantiated it with hard evidence. As far as I'm concerned it's you who needs to find the evidence to contradict such a common sense assertion.

    overnment data (and most information in most of our mainstream media) can safely be assumed to be subject to colossal bias in provenance, selection and display, intended to favour antiracist (and globalist, but that’s another aspect) political interests.

    This isn’t a safe assumption at all. It assumes a conspiracy not in evidence. After all, the things you now know about the Trayvon Martin case and the Michael Brown case came from the media and the government that you say is untrustworthy.

    So it is wholly reasonable to accept data from such sources when it goes against antiracist interests

    That’s not the way reason works. All you are doing is proclaiming a conspiracy and then choosing to believe what makes you happy. You can replace “antiracist” with anything and come up with the same illogical argument. The government is antipickles, so I know that when I hear bad things about pickles, those are the lies, and when I hear good things about pickles, that is the truth. Yum, pickles! But, honestly, this kind of faulty reasoning is probably why you’re a racist in the first place.

    Whites are only just starting to be fully trained in the arts of race grievance-mongering, as blacks have been schooled for generations.

    Don’t downplay white people’s genetic talents for “grievance-mongering.” They go to the Supreme Court over a middling student not getting into her first choice of law school. Of course, black people had actual grievances, you know.

    As far as I’m concerned it’s you who needs to find the evidence to contradict such a common sense assertion.

    Ah, yes, common sense. The flat-earthers appeal to that too.

    • Replies: @Randal

    This isn’t a safe assumption at all. It assumes a conspiracy not in evidence.
     
    There is no assumption of any overarching conspiracy, in the sense of knowingly dishonest collaboration imposed top-down by a particular organisation. All that is required is the kind of convergence of interests and shared ideological bias the consequences of which are well illustrated in the media context by Unz in the piece above.

    For sure it means there are lots of little conspiracies involved, where people tacitly agree to suppress information that "it wouldn't do" to have get out, or to present information in the manner best "for the greater good". But we know that antiracist ideology is privileged and represents the elite dogma in the social and government establishments of the countries of the US sphere because it is openly illegal to be racist in many contexts and in most others it will, in practice, be grounds for harassment and dismissal. In this context, such petty conspiracies are inevitable.

    After all, the things you now know about the Trayvon Martin case and the Michael Brown case came from the media and the government that you say is untrustworthy.
     
    Systematically biased and dishonest does not equate to empty of information. But no doubt you knew that before you wrote this false assertion.

    That’s not the way reason works.
     
    LOL!

    All you are doing is proclaiming a conspiracy and then choosing to believe what makes you happy. You can replace “antiracist” with anything and come up with the same illogical argument. The government is antipickles, so I know that when I hear bad things about pickles, those are the lies, and when I hear good things about pickles, that is the truth. Yum, pickles! But, honestly, this kind of faulty reasoning is probably why you’re a racist in the first place.
     
    Merely a repeat of your false assertion that I have suggested some kind of over-arching conspiracy when in fact I have made no such argument. As explained above, a convergence of interests and shared ideological bias is not an overarching conspiracy. Again though, I suspect you knew that.

    As for the point about government information, when you have a source with a known bias, that bias can reasonably be taken into account when assessing information from that source. It gives more credibility to information provided that goes against that bias and reduces the credibility of information that is favourable to it. That's not rocket science, as it were, and I doubt you genuinely lack the intellect required to understand the point.

    Don’t downplay white people’s genetic talents for “grievance-mongering.” They go to the Supreme Court over a middling student not getting into her first choice of law school. Of course, black people had actual grievances, you know.
     
    You know you have no real answer to the point, so you try to muddy the waters by conflating grievance-mongering on other issues with race-based grievance mongering, when the point at issue was the relative prevalence of race-based grievance-mongering specifically. Again, I doubt you really lack the intellect to grasp your own dishonesty here.

    Ah, yes, common sense. The flat-earthers appeal to that too.
     
    You seem to be doing a lot of flailing.
  142. @Boris
    Yes, the rise of Trump might have inspired more white offenders. Anecdotally I remember one such case from Boston.

    Did the “rise of Trump” inspire a black teen to burn alive an 85-year old white man named Gene Dacus recently in Birmingham, Alabama?

    • Replies: @Boris
    You guys are obsessed by anecdotal evidence. You need to kick the habit.
  143. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    Actually a great deal is known about the Trayvon affair, but most know only what appeared in the media. Worth a read isl If I Had a Son

    https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=if+i+had+a+son

    I don-t think many people are aware of the level of distortion that occurred in the MSM

    • Replies: @Azote
    Distortion in the MSM?!

    But Fred, are you trying to imply that the mainstream newspapers and TV stations and websites of the planet have formed a secret society and conspired together to "distort" the information output in order to manipulate public opinion on the Trayvon affair?

    So you are going to join the "legion" at last after your last week's mental diarrhea interesting essay on 911...

    Let us welcome ol' Fred gentlemen, please someone bring a Texas sized tinfoil hat and champagne!

  144. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    I usually love Unz’s articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman.

    That’s true if by “nothing” you mean “everything”.

  145. @hhsiii
    Yes, the above article says it was in Florida, but it was in Myrtle Beach and McClellanville , SC where she was killed.

    “Yes, the above article says it was in Florida, but it was in Myrtle Beach and McClellanville. SC where she was killed.”

    Her name was Britanee Drexel.

  146. @deplorable frog
    its true that Zimmerman should have "backed down", but there was no reason for Martin to assault him. If someone follows you from a distance, you don't turn around and deliberately confront them, and then attack them

    that kind of terrible judgement, and the subsequent details of Martin's life revealed through the fiasco showed that Martin really was a low-life thug and a criminal waiting to happen, and that Zimmerman's instincts about Martin being trouble were correct from the beginning.

    its true that Zimmerman should have “backed down”, but there was no reason for Martin to assault him.

    Zimmerman was not pursuing Trayvon when Trayvon attacked him. Z was going back to his car.

  147. @vinteuil
    A few years ago, I posted an article at Richard Spencer's original Alt-Right site, in which I demonstrated, based entirely on government statistics, that blacks commit "hate crimes" against whites about ten times more frequently than the other way 'round.

    In other words, the usual, predictable ratio of black vs. white crime.

    If I dug it up again, would you read it?

    Or you could look it all up yourself. The important point is that you have to look at the NCVS - the National Crime Victimization Survey - and not the FBI stats.

    Bill Whittle on Racial Violence

  148. @SolontoCroesus

    Who ever it is behind that curtain and whatever their agenda, will determine what we all see and hear – and ‘think’
     
    Rurik, you are breaking my heart.

    No no no.
    Whoever is behind the curtain does NOT determine what I think.

    I will be judged on my actions -- whether I get to collect 72 virgins or 72 STD polluted skanks (Samantha Power X 72? Is that not a definition of hell?)

    That being the case, I am responsible for what I think.

    Your squishy approach to the topic is disappointing.

    Nobody is out to whitewash Nazis. Rather, it is imperative that the entire story be presented: it's impossible to make accurate policy decisions if the historical data is distorted =- as we see playing out in Iraq etc.
    With so many lives already lost or ruined, and so many more on the line, I think it's vitally, as in "a matter of life and death" -- that we get the story straight.

    The story pushed by "Jewish controlled media" has not been straight since at least 1881.

    Believe it or not I've been told that the task of undoing that false narrative is a near impossibility.

    That may be so.
    What is the alternative? To allow the status quo to persist? That's the posture of a coward.

    What other nations will we wipe out based on obeisance to the sacred lie of the holocaust? How many more people have to die before we summon the courage to say, STOP! You are lying; We will not tolerate this for one more minute.

    imho you are misquided in your squishy 'yes, I know but that's not what I meant and anyway it's so hard and everybody thinks that and I don't want to ruffle feathers so I just go along.'

    You do realize, don't you, that by recklessly using Nazi terminology you are effectively chopping off the second-largest segment of White Americans, namely Germans, who are, incidentally, among the smartest and most productive members of White American society.

    Whoever is behind the curtain does NOT determine what I think.

    …I am responsible for what I think.

    I was referring to the sheeple. The narrative, if you will. It is what it is.

    if you poll ten thousand Americans randomly and ask them, ‘were the Nazis racists who considered themselves superior to others? ; 9,999 of those people would say yes. (myself included)

    What is the alternative? To allow the status quo to persist? That’s the posture of a coward.

    I believe there are very few people who are more tenacious as I in pointing out the lies told about Nazi Germany. But I’ll only go so far. From everything I know about them, their uber fascism and so forth, they would have killed a guy like be for being unwilling to shut off my brain and blindly support the Fuhrer in all things. I’d prefer to imagine myself in the mold of Rommel, who Hitler forced to commit suicide for Rommel’s unwillingness to give his support to the disastrous Nazi regime. No to Nazis, yes to truth!

    What other nations will we wipe out based on obeisance to the sacred lie of the holocaust?

    have to go

    suffice to say I consider the immediate ‘big lie’ being 911 today. And it’s that lie that is responsible for the wars today.

    • Replies: @L.K
    Rurik:

    if you poll ten thousand Americans randomly and ask them, ‘were the Nazis racists who considered themselves superior to others? ; 9,999 of those people would say yes. (myself included)

     

    First of all, vast majority of Americans are as dumb as a rock, so polling 10,000 of them means nothing. A lot of muricans cannot tell u which countries the US shares borders with.
    Take a look a this;
    Stupid Americans Clueless About September 11th Attack Fifteen Year Anniversary
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX68N0OLYPQ

    BTW, the propaganda works, eh? Noticed how many of those idiots replied Saddam Hussein?

    Also, You see, Rurik, it is not that the fucking idiots interviewed are too busy, they r just lazy, just don’t care... that is, btw, what Zionist vermim, like Sam shame, count on besides their enormous control of Media, Academia, etc.

    Now, If you poll 10 thousand well informed people and ask them, ‘were the Muricans of the 1940s racists who considered themselves superior to others? ; 10,000 of those people would say yes. (myself included). :-P
    Back in those days, even East Asians were considered inferior.
    In fact, many muricans still today think they are superior to others, particularly to 'third worlders’ & non-whites. We see some of them posting here at Unz all the time.


    Rurik:

    From everything I know about them, their uber fascism and so forth, they would have killed a guy like be for being unwilling to shut off my brain and blindly support the Fuhrer in all things.
     
    Ok, written by a middle-class(?) – successful businessman? – writing from Zusa in the 21st Century. But, but, if you were an unemployed and downtrodden working class German in the 30s b4 the National Socialists came to power & vastly improved your lot, u might be willing to trade a bit of your – largely imaginary – freedom for the more palpable gains offered.


    Rurik:

    I’d prefer to imagine myself in the mold of Rommel, who Hitler forced to commit suicide for Rommel’s unwillingness to give his support to the disastrous Nazi regime. No to Nazis, yes to truth!

     

    Hmm... Rommel actually for a long time b4 and during the war supported Hitler and the N.S party.
    The circunstances surrounding his death & whether or not he really participated in the July plot are not entirely clear.
    IMO, if he did, at that point he then betrayed his country, for one, cause even if the conspirators had succedeed, it would not have mattered at all, given the unconditional surrender BS.
    So yes, yes to the truth.
  149. @vinteuil
    A few years ago, I posted an article at Richard Spencer's original Alt-Right site, in which I demonstrated, based entirely on government statistics, that blacks commit "hate crimes" against whites about ten times more frequently than the other way 'round.

    In other words, the usual, predictable ratio of black vs. white crime.

    If I dug it up again, would you read it?

    Or you could look it all up yourself. The important point is that you have to look at the NCVS - the National Crime Victimization Survey - and not the FBI stats.

    Who cares about Boris.

    Why don’t you post the link for the rest of us to read?

    • Replies: @vinteuil
    To my surprise, the short version I published at Alt-Right is still available at RadixJournal:

    http://www.radixjournal.com/altright-archive/altright-archive/main/blogs/hbd/the-big-lie-of-the-hate-crime

    The original, with lots more details, must be sitting on one of my old hard-drives somewhere.
  150. @Chico
    I agree. Many if not most adolescent males in urban or suburban areas have had the unpleasant experiance of being stalked by a "chickenhawk." Happened to me and my friends in the 1970s, This started when we were 12-13 years old, we had to run. It must be ten times worse now with gay liberation and discrimination laws.

    To Trayvon, Zimmerman probably looked like a creep stalker like Jeff Dahmer following him down an alley.

    Spoiled a good article.

    I agree. Many if not most adolescent males in urban or suburban areas have had the unpleasant experiance of being stalked by a “chickenhawk.” Happened to me and my friends in the 1970s, This started when we were 12-13 years old, we had to run. It must be ten times worse now with gay liberation and discrimination laws.

    To Trayvon, Zimmerman probably looked like a creep stalker like Jeff Dahmer following him down an alley.

    The problem with this defense is that the stalking had ended. Zimmerman lost Trayvon (who had made it to the place he was staying) and was heading back to his car when Trayvon leapt from the bushes to attack him.

    • Replies: @Chico
    Sez Zimmerman. Trayvon did not get to testify.

    Zimmerman followed Martin down an alley between house rows. I don't discount that Martin might have thrown the first punch, but it probably looked like stalking to him and 17 year olds do not always use the best judgment.

    Since then Zimmerman been in various trouble with the law, obviously a screwup.
  151. The only entry in David Talbot’s book, Season of the Witch, under “documents” is my blog about the Nation of Islam murders in San Francisco (the Zebra Murders), Sacramento, Oklahoma City and New York City: http://thezebraproject.blogspot.com/ , which Ron Unz linked to above.

    Since 2004, I have done more research on the NOI’s murders of whites across the country than anyone but Clark Howard, the author of: Zebra: The True Account of 179 Days of Terror in San Francisco (downlaodable for free online!), and since 1989-1990, I have done more research on black supremacism and black-on-white violence than anyone, period. (My main blog, which is not limited to black supremacism, and contains over 10,000 entries, is: http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/ .)

    Oddly, Talbot’s claims in his book (e.g., that the NOI murders were limited to San Francisco, and that black detective, and future affirmative action chief of police Earl Sanders made any contribution on the case), completely contradict what he found in Zebra and at my blog. He gives no explanation for that. Talbot also gets the number of Zebra victims wrong.

    Ron Unz has graciously archived 15 of my articles and reports here: http://unz.org/Author/StixNicholas, and reprinted a sixteenth article of mine here: http://www.unz.com/article/the-death-of-first-amendment/?highlight=Stix

    My race war exposés for VDARE (2004-) are archived here: http://www.vdare.com/users/nicholas-stix .

    Free Zebra book download: http://www.archive.org/details/Zebra-Clark-Howard

  152. @Sam Shama
    [Put your energies to figuring out how the USA is going to extricate itself from “Jewish control of media,” nonviolently or to borrow Richard Breitman’s phrase, “semi-legally,”]

    Well wouldn't the straightforward route to that end be purchasing said media enterprises from Jewish hands? Organise a "Jewish Media Buyout Fund".

    Start with Ron Unz. I estimate opening bids at $25m.

    Semi-legal would be an LBO using Nazi Gold.

    Semi-legal would be an LBO using Nazi Gold.

    1. Allies cleaned out every cave and castle they could find that held Nazi papers. The claims that Nazis “stole” someone else’s gold strikes me as farcical. More likely the other way around.

    2. We know for a fact that Allies removed nearly 9 000 pieces of artwork from German museums and shipped them to New York. Allies also destroyed untold thousands of other items of German art. (“Capturing the German Eye,” by Cora Sol Goldstein)

    3. According to Rick Atkinson, who hopes to be America’s Homer to the story of WWII, US troops removed all manner of treasure from Germany (and France, Italy & North Africa). He recounts that military personnel tasked with recovering and returning to their loved ones the bodies of soldiers who died in Europe, would first remove all of the stolen items still remaining with that corpse. The goods included gems, watches, jewelry, gold, weapons, textiles, manuscripts and the like. The items were warehoused.

    4. Robert Wolfe, (late) director of the German archive at the National Archives, observed in a speech that the USA is in possession of a great deal of valuable items that have never been returned to the Germans.

    So here’s what i would suggest about that leveraged buy-out, Sam: Jewish owners of media should consider that they have already been paid.
    Multiple times.
    If they agree to quietly quit any claim to resources of the American people that they have used to pernicious ends and to the disadvantage of the American people, the US legal system will refrain from prosecuting those who have acted as foreign agents for years, without properly registering.

    The US legal system will refrain from prosecuting certain Jews for lies that embroiled the USA in wars that cost the American taxpayers billions of dollars.

    The US legal system will allow them to keep their desk, chair, a suit of clothes and a pair of shoes. Make them good shoes, preferably ones that float, and start walking, all the way to Tel Aviv.

    (heh. again with the shoes. maybe it’s freudian. )

    • Replies: @Sam Shama
    I enjoy your humour on occasion, but urge you to raise a credible plan for buyouts. Sorry, but your desire to turn the U.S. into Germania 1933-45 shall only be confined to reveries.
  153. Ron, for a brilliant mind, why should anyone take you seriously after this article? I have not always agreed with you but have always enjoyed reading your articles. But this article is just pathetic for the many reasons alluded to above. I will not bother repeating them.
    I regret to say you have just debased yourself. Please go back to the Ron that has made this website one of the very best on the web. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
    PS. This is my first comment on this blog.

    • Replies: @Peripatetic commenter
    A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

    Yours seems closed, on the other hand.
    , @Bill Jones
    PS. This is my first comment on this blog.
    One hopes it is you last.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    " the many reasons alluded to above" doesn't absolve you from the duty not to waste people's time with totally unparticularised generalities and an absence of reasoned argument.

    We know how you feel, but can you think?
  154. In your own numbers Boris, black murderers are twice as likely to kill white persons as white murderers are to kill black persons (16% versus 8%).

    Seems like quite an imbalance to me and suggests that blacks may well be more likely to engage in hate crime than whites.

    And for such a small population, there seems to be an awful lot of killing.

    • Replies: @Boris

    In your own numbers Boris, black murderers are twice as likely to kill white persons as white murderers are to kill black persons (16% versus 8%).
     
    You missed this part:

    If blacks were randomly selecting victims, ~70% would be white.
     
    You have to take into account the population distribution. Since the black on white murder rate is so far below even the rate for victims picked completely at random, this is good evidence that blacks are not targeting whites. The hate crime statistics support the same conclusion.

    The same is true of whites of course. They are less likely to kill a black person than we would expect based on the population distribution.
  155. @Anonymous Smith
    Hello.

    You wrote: "Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him?"

    Emmett Till's father would have had a huge influence on Emmett's DNA, his genetics. Psychopathy is mostly a genetic thing, whereas Sociopathy is mostly an epigenetic thing (genetic mutations arising from environmental influences, such as: blows to the head, poor diet, frequent spankings or beatings, poverty, etc.). Both are classified as antisocial personality disorders (ASPD) and both can lead to extremely violent behavior...especially in males.

    Although we can't, with any confidence, analyze Emmett Till's case from where we are today, we can glean at least one small, but important, clue from the Unz article, and that is the reference to the "wolf whistle". A wolf-whistle (I had to look it up) is when you stick your fingers in your mouth in order to amplify and project the whistling sound. Now, for a young black male to do that (which would almost certainly have been accompanied by sexually orientated proclamations of one kind or other) toward a white women, in that day and age, in Mississippi, I would say that there is a strong possibility of ASPD demonstrated in that.

    Hope this helps.

    Although we can’t, with any confidence, analyze Emmett Till’s case from where we are today, we can glean at least one small, but important, clue from the Unz article, and that is the reference to the “wolf whistle”. A wolf-whistle (I had to look it up) is when you stick your fingers in your mouth in order to amplify and project the whistling sound. Now, for a young black male to do that (which would almost certainly have been accompanied by sexually orientated proclamations of one kind or other) toward a white women, in that day and age, in Mississippi, I would say that there is a strong possibility of ASPD demonstrated in that.

    I see. So let me summarize your line of reasoning, tell me if I’m missing something:

    Wolf-whistling at white woman + Psychopath Father + Possible inheritance of father’s ASPD = Grounds for Execution ?

    • Agree: Boris
    • Replies: @Anonymous Smith
    Wow, that's a fancy equation you've formulated there. Where'd you learn that...the Noel Ignatiev School of Libtard Mathematics? Oops! I hope I didn't trigger you.

    Now, let's see if we can get things cleared up...

    In my previous post, I was simply saying that Emmette Till could have been a psychopath, or a sociopath, since his father was a convicted rapist and a murderer. The father's genetic filth could easily have been infected into his male offspring. Couple that with a background of abject poverty, and all the crap that goes along with that, and you've got the perfect environment for the development of violent psychopathy/sociopathy.

    I find it extremely difficult to believe that someone would hang a 14 yo boy for simply whistling at a white woman. There MUST be something more to it than that...I think we're being misled. I think the Till boy was a psychopath, just like his father, and he sexually assaulted that woman. No one holds a murderous rage in check for three full days and then goes out to kill. That's not the way it works at all. I think the woman was profoundly humiliated by the experience (rape) and couldn't bare to tell her husband the truth. Then, after three days of urging, the poor woman finally broke down and told her worried husband the terrible truth. Upon hearing this hideous tale, he THEN flew into a murderous rage and quickly formulated a plan for revenge. They waited till nightfall, kidnaped the violent Negro, took him out and hung him. Case closed.

    Now, If that were me and my wife was raped by that Negro, ida done a whole lot more than just hang him. I would have taken him out to an abandoned shack in the middle of nowhere, and ida gone to work on his black ass with a pair of plyers and a blowtorch. His suffering would be, to this very day, the stuff of Mississippi legend!

    I hope I cleared every thing up to your satisfaction.

    Have a nice day!
  156. @Anonymous
    Once again for you math-ignorant working-class idiots. Now try to follow along.

    34oo divided by 77 (1882 - 1959) years equals 44 lynchings per year. According to the census, in 1880 there were 7.5 million blacks in the USA. In 1960, 18.9 million. That's a mean average (good enough for our purposes) of 13.2 million blacks per year of whom 44 were lynched which works out to 1 out of 300,000 blacks lynched per year.

    Now, given that black males commit murder, rape, armed robbery, assault and burglary at the world's highest rates (in multiples of tens per 100,000), are you trying to make the argument that none of those thugs deserved to be lynched? For murder alone there would be roughly 60 black perpetrators per year. Throw in rape and armed robbery or assault and the number of perpetrators skyrockets into the hundreds. If anything, whites have been far too lenient on black males.

    This year, 1 out of 8400 Americans will be killed in automobile accidents. Thus, the likelihood of a black person's having been lynched in any year was 36 times less than of his being killed in an auto accident today.

    Try to educate yourself so that you can acquire a sense of perspective. The world makes much more sense when you see the big picture.

    34oo divided by 77 (1882 – 1959) years equals 44 lynchings per year. According to the census, in 1880 there were 7.5 million blacks in the USA. In 1960, 18.9 million. That’s a mean average (good enough for our purposes) of 13.2 million blacks per year of whom 44 were lynched which works out to 1 out of 300,000 blacks lynched per year.

    Now, given that black males commit murder, rape, armed robbery, assault and burglary at the world’s highest rates (in multiples of tens per 100,000), are you trying to make the argument that none of those thugs deserved to be lynched? For murder alone there would be roughly 60 black perpetrators per year. Throw in rape and armed robbery or assault and the number of perpetrators skyrockets into the hundreds. If anything, whites have been far too lenient on black males.

    Here’s where your logic breaks down. You’re using recent and current crime rates of blacks to make inferences about their crime rates between 1882 and 1959. It’s well-known that crime rates among blacks skyrocketed after the civil rights era. So these numbers are probably a gross overestimate of pre-civil rights crime rates among blacks. Is it so hard to accept that some of the lynched blacks may have been innocent, or may not have deserved punishments as severe as lynching? And I love how you add in rape/armed robbery/assault to the numbers, as though execution by lynching is a perfectly justifiable punishment for these crimes.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Phrases like "its well known…" always disguise the fact that the author has no evidence to back up what they are saying.

    Black crime didn't skyrocket after the civil rights era. Blacks have always been the most violent people around. Past black writers on negro crime;

    "It seems plain in the first place that the 4 percent of the population of Philadelphia having Negro blood furnished from 1885 to 1889, 14 percent of the serious crimes, and from 1890 to 1895, 22 ½ percent. (p. 249)"

    and

    "DuBois and associates say:
    It seems fair to conclude that Negroes in the United Sates, forming about 1/8 of the population were responsible in 1890 for nearly 1/5 of the crime."

    etc.

    For more evidence read The Negro in Negroland. Slavery was endemic in African tribal culture, some 40 to 60% of all African negros were enslaved to other negros. Cannabalism was rife. When a tribal leader was hungry, some of his slaves were murdered and eaten. These were very primitive stone-aged people who were forced to adapt to an agricultural and then post-industrial revolution society in the span of a few generations.

    Conflict was (and still is) inevitable.
  157. @Boris

    LOL. Oh, excuuuuuuse me. The ‘hate-crime stats’, you say? Har, har, har, har, har. You mean the small number of crimes that are defined as “hate crimes” by law-enforcement under media pressure?
     
    Evidence?


    Just look up the plain-vanilla violent crime stats, pal. Blacks commit violent crime at a rate TEN TIMES HIGHER than that of whites.
     
    We're talking interracial crime, chief.

    16% (446/2651) of black murderers killed white victims.
    8% (187/2675) of white murderers killed black victims.

    There doesn't appear to be any targeting in those numbers. If blacks were randomly selecting victims, ~70% would be white. So relying on "but..but..VIOLENT CRIME THO!" doesn't substantiate your claim. There's in no evidence for hate crimes in those numbers.

    We’re talking interracial crime, chief.

    16% (446/2651) of black murderers killed white victims.
    8% (187/2675) of white murderers killed black victims.

    There doesn’t appear to be any targeting in those numbers. If blacks were randomly selecting victims, ~70% would be white. So relying on “but..but..VIOLENT CRIME THO!” doesn’t substantiate your claim. There’s in no evidence for hate crimes in those numbers.

    Ah, I see. The FBI now politically-correctifies its statistics. I just checked through what the FBI now posts online as “statistics”. Typical government scumbaggery. Too bad.

    Up through 2013, the on-line FBI crime tables contained some amount of breakdown by race, usually as Tables 43A through 67C. I have copies of them. Probably won’t copy/paste into this comment space, but, let me try … see below, not so good. That is a copy of Excel spreadsheet columns A1-M39.

    I have spreadsheets for 17 FBI tables having some, but somewhat mixed, race stats for 2013. I guess I kinda had a feeling that PC would come to the, er, people’s national law-enforcement agency.

    [MORE]

    Table 55A
    Arrests
    Metropolitan Counties
    by Race, 2013
    [1,374 agencies; 2013 estimated population 57,208,460]
    Offense charged Total arrests Percent distribution1
    Race
    Total White “Black or
    African
    American” “American
    Indian or
    Alaska
    Native” Asian “Native
    Hawaiian
    or Other
    Pacific
    Islander” Total White “Black or
    African
    American” “American
    Indian or
    Alaskan
    Native” Asian “Native
    Hawaiian
    or Other
    Pacific
    Islander”
    TOTAL 1,693,094 1,230,918 425,496 13,587 21,751 1,342 100.0 72.7 25.1 0.8 1.3 0.1
    Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter 1,607 929 647 10 20 1 100.0 57.8 40.3 0.6 1.2 0.1
    Rape3 2,433 1,818 576 13 24 2 100.0 74.7 23.7 0.5 1.0 0.1
    Robbery 9,856 4,574 5,134 39 99 10 100.0 46.4 52.1 0.4 1.0 0.1
    Aggravated assault 55,370 38,958 15,194 480 665 73 100.0 70.4 27.4 0.9 1.2 0.1
    Burglary 38,997 29,270 9,172 183 342 30 100.0 75.1 23.5 0.5 0.9 0.1
    Larceny-theft 130,507 88,508 39,426 707 1,796 70 100.0 67.8 30.2 0.5 1.4 0.1
    Motor vehicle theft 10,130 7,758 2,126 76 148 22 100.0 76.6 21.0 0.8 1.5 0.2
    Arson 1,340 1,054 236 16 32 2 100.0 78.7 17.6 1.2 2.4 0.1
    Violent crime4 69,266 46,279 21,551 542 808 86 100.0 66.8 31.1 0.8 1.2 0.1
    Property crime4 180,974 126,590 50,960 982 2,318 124 100.0 69.9 28.2 0.5 1.3 0.1
    Other assaults 160,541 115,504 42,191 1,140 1,621 85 100.0 71.9 26.3 0.7 1.0 0.1
    Forgery and counterfeiting 9,908 6,201 3,532 33 137 5 100.0 62.6 35.6 0.3 1.4 0.1
    Fraud 26,284 17,971 7,896 157 256 4 100.0 68.4 30.0 0.6 1.0 *
    Embezzlement 2,404 1,468 905 9 21 1 100.0 61.1 37.6 0.4 0.9 *
    Stolen property; buying, receiving, possessing 15,152 10,861 4,084 75 125 7 100.0 71.7 27.0 0.5 0.8 *
    Vandalism 28,150 21,214 6,414 249 261 12 100.0 75.4 22.8 0.9 0.9 *
    Weapons; carrying, possessing, etc. 18,484 12,258 5,939 74 186 27 100.0 66.3 32.1 0.4 1.0 0.1
    Prostitution and commercialized vice 3,318 1,916 1,146 29 223 4 100.0 57.7 34.5 0.9 6.7 0.1
    Sex offenses (except rape and prostitution) 9,696 7,771 1,746 66 110 3 100.0 80.1 18.0 0.7 1.1 *
    Drug abuse violations 237,935 174,210 59,636 1,204 2,693 192 100.0 73.2 25.1 0.5 1.1 0.1
    Gambling 721 393 193 7 122 6 100.0 54.5 26.8 1.0 16.9 0.8
    Offenses against the family and children 31,065 18,290 12,465 174 135 1 100.0 58.9 40.1 0.6 0.4 *
    Driving under the influence 227,077 191,702 28,277 1,358 5,441 299 100.0 84.4 12.5 0.6 2.4 0.1
    Liquor laws 35,568 31,091 3,419 529 523 6 100.0 87.4 9.6 1.5 1.5 *
    Drunkenness 34,919 29,924 4,228 355 369 43 100.0 85.7 12.1 1.0 1.1 0.1
    Disorderly conduct 43,164 27,607 14,851 355 345 6 100.0 64.0 34.4 0.8 0.8 *
    Vagrancy 2,024 1,537 455 12 18 2 100.0 75.9 22.5 0.6 0.9 0.1
    All other offenses (except traffic) 553,863 386,456 154,885 6,220 5,886 416 100.0 69.8 28.0 1.1 1.1 0.1
    Suspicion 43 36 7 0 0 0 100.0 83.7 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Curfew and loitering law violations 2,538 1,639 716 17 153 13 100.0 64.6 28.2 0.7 6.0 0.5

  158. So in the first part of the statement, Unz makes it sound like the media downplayed the severity of Till’s offense towards the white lady, but then he gives no evidence of what the supposedly more serious offense was. He points out Till’s father was a convicted murderer. Unz doesn’t mention that his dad was put to death in 1945, when Emmett was 4 years old. Exactly how much influence could his murdering/rapist dad have had on him?

    1. The fact that, in this day and age, you remain ignorant of DNA is duly noted.

    2. Ron doesn’t need any evidence of a “supposedly more serious offense”. The point is that there is no reason whatsoever to believe the account we have been given.

  159. @Bob Johnson
    I usually love Unz's articles, but this one has some very disagreeable material. While you are right about michael brown robbing the store owner, nothing suggests trayvon martin was in the wrong for attacking zimmerman. Imagine being stalked, walking home from a grocery store, by a creepy, violent, armed man. By following Martin in the first place, after he was told not to by 911, zimmerman was the aggressor. Nothing suggests emmet till sexually harassed anyone, even if his dad was a rapist

    On the Klan, an interesting angle might be it's collaboration-during the progressive era-with the US government. The Klan had a lot of cross membership with the ultrapatriotic, WASP supremacist, pro-war American Protective League. The Klan enthusiastically supported ww1, prohibition, public education, eugenics, and other programs of the political establishment. An article on the klan's pro-ww1 activites, and it's alliance with woodrow wilson's blackshirts, the APL, would be interesting.

    Nothing suggests Trayvon Martin was in the wrong you say? Only the fact the jury found Zimmerman acted in self defense when he shot Trayvon. Nor was he told not to follow Trayvon, but instead a non police 911 operator told him you don’t have to do that at which point he responded in the affirmative and was in the process of returning to his car when assaulted. More interesting than the Klans history, during which 1 out 3 of their victims were white, is that neither the ADL or the SPLC estimate their current membership in excess of 6000, which means liberals invest a lot of ink on a group with virtually zero political clout. As to whether Till sexually assaulted the shooters wife, it is of course gospel among liberals that whether a sexual assault occurs or not is in the eye of the victim, unless of course the perp is black and the victim white.

  160. @Anonymous Smith
    Great article , Ron! The best I've read from you so far. Kudos!

    I don't have time for a lengthy comment at the moment, but I'm going to reread this piece (to enjoy it again, and to make sure I didn't accidentally miss anything) tomorrow and comment on the important points you brought to light.

    Again, Ron, damn good article!

    I’m a hunt-n-peck typist, so lemme get right to it.

    First things first. You wrote about the dishonesty of the MSM, and I couldn’t agree with you more, but you failed to give anything more than a superficial treatment of what is, in reality, an incomprehensively massive problem. Volumes could be written about the depravity of the MSM, I know, I just feel like you could have used stronger language in your descriptions of them. But, let’s move on…

    In order to effectively fight against something you have to “know thine enemy.” So, in order to know this enemy, the MSM, we have to dig into the guts of these organizations and find out who the hell is calling the shots. So, let’s do that. Let us start with the owners/chief operators of the various MSM corporations.

    Viacom: Chairman and CEO, Sumner Redstone. Sumner is Jewish.
    Comcast: Chairman and CEO, Brian L. Roberts. Brian is Jewish.
    The Walt Disney Company: Chairman and CEO, Robert A. Iger. Robert is Jewish.
    Time Warner: Chairman and CEO, Jeff Bewkes. Jeffrey is Jewish.
    News Corp: Chairman and CEO, Rupert Murdoch. Rupert is a Jew, by Jewish law.
    CBS: President and CEO, Leslie Moonves. Les is Jewish.

    These six corporations control more than 90% of the media in the US. The other 10% of the US media is also effectively controlled by the Jews through strategic infiltration into high level executive positions, and into all other levels (writers, producers, directors, editors, columnists, etc., etc.) of corporate operations.

    The Jews control the MSM. They’re also vastly overrepresented in the Cultural Marxism/Social Justice movement, which is heavily propagandized to the American people through the MSM, numerous Jewish controlled NGO’s, and, of course, the entire educational system.

    Let’s move on.

    Check this out…

    http://clashdaily.com/2015/12/breaking-17-black-thugs-arrested-for-burning-white-girl-alive-the-msm-is-silent/

    It’s hard to plumb the depths of human barbarity…every time I think I’ve heard, or seen, the worst example of man’s inhumanity something new comes along to take it’s place.

    In order to comprehend the true magnitude of black-on-white criminality (and where we’re headed (Race/Civil War) if we fail to get control of the beast) we need to look for news aggregation websites that specialize in black-on-white crime. I’ve only found one to date…

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEbta5E_jqlZmEJsriTEtnw

    There may be others, I don’t know…if anyone knows of other sites like this one lemme know.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Total rubbish about Rupert Murdoch being Jewish and it really would be interesting to know how this crap gets started and repeated. (Maybe you should learn touch typing so you have more reading, listening and thinking time).

    What possible relevance to anything worth writing about (apart from family history for family) is the fact that Rupert's DNA may be one eighth Ashkenazi because his mother's mother's mother was Jewish? What if he were like some Catholic cousins of mine who are blonde and blue-eyed and of three quarters Ashkenazi descent but couldn't claim their Biblical patrilineal rights even if Dad had been a Cohen because of their mother's mother....?

  161. @SolontoCroesus

    Mengele said it best…”the more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it”.
     
    I googled that quote. Among the links on the first page was one to the project of Ms. Rene Brown's Language Arts class at Peters Township middle school.

    The student-writers posted their references -- almost all to websites, except for notes from Ms. Brown's lectures. The Mengele quote was sourced to http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote/joseph_mengele_quote_e5e2

    The student writing contained numerous spelling and grammar errors, but hey, they're just 12- and 13- year olds (or were 6 years ago; now they're old enough to vote).

    Here's what else they had to say about Dr. Mengele:

    He killed women with injections that caused horrible pain, stomach spasms, and bleeding (Auschwitz). Dr. Herta Oberhauser also came to Auschwitz (Auschwtiz). She worked mostly with adults. She gave them oil injections, took out main organs, and threw sawdust and chipped glass into open wounds (Auschwitz).

    . . .

     Josef Mengele was always the fist doctor that was called when an "experiment" needed to be done (The Holocaust). He preformed untrained spinal surgery, body dissection, and twin sketches on his patients (Auschwitz). The get his experimental bodies he went into the barracks and offered clothes and candy to people (Auschwitz). Then he took them personally to the laboratory (Auschwitz). He mostly experimented on the children rather than the adults (Auschwitz).
    . . .
    Tortures were only done to amuse people . . .to find cheaper and easier ways to kill people.
     
    Of special interest was Ms. Brown's students' mention of Mengele's experiments on twins:

     When a pair of twins was found they would be killed at the exact same time to keep the body cycle in sync (Auschwitz). Mengele then dissected each twin personally because he liked to sketch every part of their bodies exactly (Auschwitz). Josef Mengele did numerous tests to see how the twins reacted (Gates). He put dye in their eyes to attempt to change their eye color (Gates). Mengele stated, "The more we do to you, the less you believe we are doing it"(Dr. Joseph Mengele). He was almost fanatical about drawing and exchanging blood (The Holocaust). The victims were usually left without bandages and died because of infection if they did not die during the experiment (The Holocaust). If the victims did not die during or after the experiment cycle they were killed (Auschwitz).
     
    I find this passage interesting because it is very similar to the conversation an 86-year old holocaust survivor had with an interviewer on NPR last year. The occasion was the trial of a 93-year old German man on trial as an accomplice to murder based on his work as a baggage handler at trains to concentration camps. The woman said she had been contacted by legal staff in the prosecution of the German. She said that she and her twin sister were at Auschwitz, where she became very ill. "Dr. Mengele stood by my bed and said I would die in two or three days. I was determined not to die because if I died he would kill my twin sister."

    No doubt it was her "determination not to die" rather than the care she received in the hospital at Auschwitz that accounts for her survival to the fine age of 86, still healthy enough to travel to Europe to participate in the prosecution of a 93-year old baggage handler. (He was convicted and sentenced to prison.)

    ---

    What happens when the 12- to 14-year old students in Ms. Brown's class grow up? They posted on the world wide web, in about 2009:

    Around eleven million people were killed during the Holocaust. Six million of the people killed were Jewish and killed just because it was possible. The other five million people were non-Jews. They were killed because Hitler did not want them in his perfect race. His perfect race was known as the Aryian [sic] race. They were either killed on the spot or taken to death camps to suffer. In death camps people were killed by gassing, starvation, shooting, disease, burning, and any other way that was thought of. [emphasis theirs]
     
    Do they ever challenge these claims?

    They wrote:

    When prisioners [sic] first arrived in death camps, they were killed on the spot or sent straight to the gas chambers unless they were fit to work (The Holocaust). They would be forced into the gas chambers or just shot on the spot (Gates). They could also die of starvation, disease, shooting, and burning (Auschwitz). The gas chambers were used to exterminate large sums of people using Zyklon-B gas (The Holocaust). Jews, gypsies, Soviet POWs and other prisoners were all killed (The Holocaust). If the prisioners [sic] were fit to work they would receive [sic] hard and pointless jobs (Auschwitz). Ms. Brown stated, “Some of the jobs were even assisting in the killings of  their friends and family”(Brown).  Some prisioners were also killed through brutal medical experiments.
     
    Ron Unz wrote:

    “We naively tend to assume that our media accurately reflects the events of our world and its history, but instead what we all too often see are only the tremendously distorted images of a circus fun-house mirror, with small items sometimes transformed into large ones, and large ones into small. The contours of historical reality may be warped into almost unrecognizable shapes, with some important elements completely disappearing from the record and others appearing out of nowhere. I’ve often suggested that the media creates our reality, but given such glaring omissions and distortions, the reality produced is often largely fictional. Our standard histories have always criticized the ludicrous Soviet propaganda during the height of Stalin’s purges or the Ukrainian famine, but in its own way, our own media organs sometimes seem just as dishonest and absurd in their own reporting.”

    Does the same apply to America's teachers?

    What happens when our young people -- those then-13-year olds, now 19- to 20-year olds-- discover that "the historical reality" they learned in Ms. Brown's 3rd Period Language Arts class at Peters Township Middle School (a Blue Ribbon School!) was "warped into almost unrecognizable shapes . . . dishonest and absurd . . ."

    Does the same pattern that Unz claimed applies to media, apply also to the public education system in the US?

    “A pattern of blatant dishonesty that is too large and continues for too long produces obvious consequences. On a whole range of issues, certainly including racial ones, [as well as claims about Nazis and holocaust] the American media education system may be fast approaching the point of possessing negative credibility, with increasing numbers of people tending to assume that the facts may be exactly opposite to what the media their teachers claim."
     
    Several years ago Jeremy ben Ami, founder of J-Street, spoke about a book he had just written, about the I-P conflict. In the audience was a man who teaches Ben Ami's children. That teacher asked, "What shall we teach our children?"

    ben Ami acknowledged that the question had very personal import.
    He answered the question: "We must tell them the truth, otherwise there will be resentment."
    ben Ami's voice trailed off and the book event ended.
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?301263-1/new-voice-israel

    Who is going to tell Rene Brown's 3rd Period Literary Arts class that they were lied to, and how will they react?

    (And who is going to tell them that they really ought to spell-check their work.)

    Solonto, my quote regarding Mengele has nothing to do with him being the monster he was – it is a quote that sheds light on the power of denial. And it applies to ALL people, not just jews WW2 Germany.

    Thus my point later in that post stating those that should know better what is going on today are just as in a strong state of denial. It’s just a slower boil.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    If Mengele was such a monster why was he not tried at Nuremberg?

    what is the basis for your declaration that Mengele was a monster?

    We know that anti-German propaganda was purveyed, by the British, Americans, and Jews, from at least 1933 until the present, and that much of it was grotesquely distorted.

    Ron Unz expressed at least half-a-dozen times in the article above that when reality, truth, the facts, etc. are distorted, seen thru a fun-house mirror, etc. consistently and relentlessly, eventually the purveyors of those distortions lose all credibility, and the only way to discern what is real is by assuming the opposite to be true.

    Do you believe the systems Ron described applies to all other phenomenon but not to the narratives of WWII/ Nazis / holocaust?

    Are you claiming that THOSE narratives were true and real in every respect, but every other instance of fun house distortions of reality should be mistrusted?

    If that's not what you intend, then why resort to quoting something that may or may not have been said by Mengele, whose actual character we really can't know because it has been so completely distorted by anti-German propagandists?

    I don't understand your explanation about the "power of denial." Nevertheless, imo you cloud the issue when you introduce information attributed to a "monster" like Mengele, or any other "Nazi" related source, because anything and everything Nazi is ipso facto loaded, and distorted beyond all ability to convey any measure of credibility.

    --
    OK -- I read your comment again, and again.
    You think Black people are sources of some of the biggest problems USA faces.
    I don't.
    You think most people are "in denial" that Blacks are a major problem. Maybe. But see above -- I don't think Blacks are the biggest problem, so "denial" or not denial is irrelevant.

    I think Black people are being used.

    How many Black people are in charge of media?
    How many Black people have the power to involve USA in wars?
    How many Black people can pull levers that destabilize the economies of millions -- tens of millions of people, the way the US Treasury is destabilizing Iran, Syria, Russia?
    Bibi comes to DC and the entire Congress jumps up and down like kindergartners on meth.
    The best Black people can come up with is to trot out John Lewis to lead a sit-in -- an ineffective and embarrassing exercise in silliness.

    Black people are pawns -- stupid pawns, fawning ignorant sheeple suck-up pawns, but they are not power brokers.
    White people are starting to recognize how unempowered, or disempowered, they are. Blacks have known about disempowerment for a long time. Whites and Blacks are converging toward mutual disempowerment and it is scaring the crap out of Whites who have not been accustomed to impotence.

    Colin Powell was not calling the shots when he stood at the UN and said Saddam had to go, he was being used, because he was a Black man who had attained some stature. He was the Used one, not the User. NOTHING that Powell said redounded to his benefit -- or to the benefit of a single Black American, for that matter. There are probably more Black men who died in Iraq than any other group. And Black people got nada out of the whole debacle.



    ---

    Rurik argues that the maybe-false information people believe about Nazis, etc. cannot be undone.
    That maybe so.
    But why continue to reinforce it?
    And are you making the strongest argument you can make if you rely on information that is held -- however firmly -- largely on the basis that it has been heavily propagandized? Aren't there negative implications for holding onto information that may be false? How can an accurate analysis, or diagnosis, be conducted if the factors used in the calculation are of dubious credibility?
  162. @Boris

    In fact, the evidence suggests that the overwhelming majority of all racially-motivated violent attacks in America each year are committed by blacks
     
    This claim isn't supported by your source, which is a Thomas Sowell article that doesn't delve into the statistics at all.

    And FBI statistics tend to contradict you: https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2014

    In 2014, race was reported for 5,192 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:

    52.0 percent were White.

    23.2 percent were Black or African American.

    in 2014, there were 3,227 victims of racially motivated hate crime.

    62.7 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Black or African American bias.

    22.7 percent were victims of anti-White bias.
     
    Now, this data isn't perfect. Certainly not all racially motivated attacks will be labelled as hate crimes. But there is no evidence here that blacks commit more racially motivated attacks, let alone the "overwhelming majority" of them.

    Now, this data isn’t perfect. Certainly not all racially motivated attacks will be labelled as hate crimes. But there is no evidence here that blacks commit more racially motivated attacks, let alone the “overwhelming majority” of them.

    People who live in the real world know that 95% of hate crimes fall into one of two categories:

    (1) Blacks attacking whites or, less often, other non-blacks; and

    (2) Non-queers attacking queers or people perceived to be queer.

    • Replies: @Boris

    People who live in the real world know
     
    In the real world we ask for evidence. I think you are think of fairly tales?
  163. @roofgoat
    Solonto, my quote regarding Mengele has nothing to do with him being the monster he was - it is a quote that sheds light on the power of denial. And it applies to ALL people, not just jews WW2 Germany.

    Thus my point later in that post stating those that should know better what is going on today are just as in a strong state of denial. It's just a slower boil.

    If Mengele was such a monster why was he not tried at Nuremberg?

    what is the basis for your declaration that Mengele was a monster?

    We know that anti-German propaganda was purveyed, by the British, Americans, and Jews, from at least 1933 until the present, and that much of it was grotesquely distorted.

    Ron Unz expressed at least half-a-dozen times in the article above that when reality, truth, the facts, etc. are distorted, seen thru a fun-house mirror, etc. consistently and relentlessly, eventually the purveyors of those distortions lose all credibility, and the only way to discern what is real is by assuming the opposite to be true.

    Do you believe the systems Ron described applies to all other phenomenon but not to the narratives of WWII/ Nazis / holocaust?

    Are you claiming that THOSE narratives were true and real in every respect, but every other instance of fun house distortions of reality should be mistrusted?

    If that’s not what you intend, then why resort to quoting something that may or may not have been said by Mengele, whose actual character we really can’t know because it has been so completely distorted by anti-German propagandists?

    I don’t understand your explanation about the “power of denial.” Nevertheless, imo you cloud the issue when you introduce information attributed to a “monster” like Mengele, or any other “Nazi” related source, because anything and everything Nazi is ipso facto loaded, and distorted beyond all ability to convey any measure of credibility.


    OK — I read your comment again, and again.
    You think Black people are sources of some of the biggest problems USA faces.
    I don’t.
    You think most people are “in denial” that Blacks are a major problem. Maybe. But see above — I don’t think Blacks are the biggest problem, so “denial” or not denial is irrelevant.

    I think Black people are being used.

    How many Black people are in charge of media?
    How many Black people have the power to involve USA in wars?
    How many Black people can pull levers that destabilize the economies of millions — tens of millions of people, the way the US Treasury is destabilizing Iran, Syria, Russia?
    Bibi comes to DC and the entire Congress jumps up and down like kindergartners on meth.
    The best Black people can come up with is to trot out John Lewis to lead a sit-in — an ineffective and embarrassing exercise in silliness.

    Black people are pawns — stupid pawns, fawning ignorant sheeple suck-up pawns, but they are not power brokers.
    White people are starting to recognize how unempowered, or disempowered, they are. Blacks have known about disempowerment for a long time. Whites and Blacks are converging toward mutual disempowerment and it is scaring the crap out of Whites who have not been accustomed to impotence.

    Colin Powell was not calling the shots when he stood at the UN and said Saddam had to go, he was being used, because he was a Black man who had attained some stature. He was the Used one, not the User. NOTHING that Powell said redounded to his benefit — or to the benefit of a single Black American, for that matter. There are probably more Black men who died in Iraq than any other group. And Black people got nada out of the whole debacle.

    Rurik argues that the maybe-false information people believe about Nazis, etc. cannot be undone.
    That maybe so.
    But why continue to reinforce it?
    And are you making the strongest argument you can make if you rely on information that is held — however firmly — largely on the basis that it has been heavily propagandized? Aren’t there negative implications for holding onto information that may be false? How can an accurate analysis, or diagnosis, be conducted if the factors used in the calculation are of dubious credibility?

  164. @Anonymous Smith
    I agree with almost every thing you said, Rurik. The only things I disagree with are your thoughts on the Holocaust, and your characterization of the causes of Jewish paranoia.

    It's obvious that you know next to nothing about the Holocaust. It's nothing to be ashamed of, mind you, as we have all been subjected to the relentless brainwashing program centered on the Jewish Holocaust mythology. I urge you to investigate the Holocaust with much more diligence, and rigor, than you have. By doing this you will be able to clear your mind of a huge cloud of Jewish brainwashing. A great place to start would be the writings of David Irving...the Jews absolutely despise him and have gone to great lengths to smear and attack him; there is "anti-Irving" propaganda that has been inserted into one or two Hollywood movies. Irving has also been viciously attacked by the MSM...they accused him of providing the trigger mechanisms for the Oklahoma city bomb! Ernst Zundel is another good one...he's been jailed several times for his efforts to get the truth out to the people. Fred Leuchter and Robert Faurisson are also good...the Jews beat the shit out of Faurisson on a couple of occasions.

    The Hostile Jewish Elite do not fear and distrust white folks because they might be closet-Nazi's. They practically invented the entire Nazi-as-mass-murderer narrative, so, why would they be apprehensive about some fictitious idea that they themselves created? The real reason they fear and distrust white people in particular is because they're up to no good and they're deeply afraid we'll discover their treacheries!

    Well, we are uncovering their intrigues and bringing them into the light. They are terrified by our rapid progress and are frantically trying to impede us in every possible way. It's good that people are waking up to the clandestine programs of the International Jew, but, there is a massive downside to our truth-telling efforts...the more truth we expose the more hostile and violent they become!

    I disagree with are your thoughts on the Holocaust, and your characterization of the causes of Jewish paranoia.

    The real reason they fear and distrust white people in particular is because they’re up to no good and they’re deeply afraid we’ll discover their treacheries!

    and then what? Another Holocaust!

    I agree that much of what we’ve been told vis-a-vis the Holocaust was a fraud. (And some of it was true). But be that as it may, I suspect that most Jews are raised to believe it was all true. And that the goyim have been persecuting them for 2000 years, blah, blah, blah. You see what that does is it reinforces the idea that the Jews need to stick together and support their leaders- the rabbis who need money to keep them all protected, and stay suspicious of the dangerous and eternally anti-Semitic goyim. And have your fun with the shiksas, but don’t marry them!

    It’s a scam, but it works for the rabbis and the powerful Jews, so they keep the common Jews under their thrall. Divide and conquer.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    I'm scratching my bald head trying to figure out why you'd want to reinforce the scams the rabbis are running, but whatever . . .

    Here's a challenge for you, Rurik: You think the Achilles heel is the falseness of 9/11.

    Prepare a 3 minute talk to those kids in Middle School (@ 142) -- the ones whose teacher let them get away with writing that a Nazi doctor "put sawdust and broken glass" into wounds.

    Explain to those kids why and how 9/11 is a false narrative.

    Peters Township is an upper- middle-class (mostly white collar), prosperous suburb, generally high educational achievement, diverse population. According to Mapquest, there's a Chabad house not too far away, and the school is across from a large Catholic church. Your audience will include Christians, Jews, Muslims, a few Blacks, several different ethnic groups.

    How would you explain to them that 9/11 is false, and what the implications are?

    Would kids who were 5 yrs old when 9/11 happened, and who wrote as gospel --and apparently their teacher's approval -- that Mengele and Nazis shot or stuffed into gas chambers the people they didn't first kill, believe you if you said that 9/11 was NOT pulled off by 19 Muslims with box cutters?
    , @Sam Shama
    [And have your fun with the shiksas, but don’t marry them!]
    c'mon, have you checked on Jewish out-marriage rates?
  165. @Wizard of Oz
    Are you suggesting that there is much tacit support (as well as some open suport that I have heard) for offsetting black numbers with Latino, and also, perhaps that the MSM has been scared of stirring up more blacks to join in the racial violence against whites?

    No, I am suggesting there is open support for offsetting the native-born somewhat creme au lait for a darker variety, but that the consequences for this preference are not quite what was expected.

  166. @lavoisier
    In your own numbers Boris, black murderers are twice as likely to kill white persons as white murderers are to kill black persons (16% versus 8%).

    Seems like quite an imbalance to me and suggests that blacks may well be more likely to engage in hate crime than whites.

    And for such a small population, there seems to be an awful lot of killing.

    In your own numbers Boris, black murderers are twice as likely to kill white persons as white murderers are to kill black persons (16% versus 8%).

    You missed this part:

    If blacks were randomly selecting victims, ~70% would be white.

    You have to take into account the population distribution. Since the black on white murder rate is so far below even the rate for victims picked completely at random, this is good evidence that blacks are not targeting whites. The hate crime statistics support the same conclusion.

    The same is true of whites of course. They are less likely to kill a black person than we would expect based on the population distribution.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
    Boris,

    Thank you for arguing from the standpoint of numbers and facts.

    I did not say black murderers on average are deliberately targeting whites. I said that there is strong evidence that you provided that suggests blacks are far more likely to kill whites than the other way around.

    As far as the argument from the population distribution that goes both ways. While black murderers have more of an opportunity to find a white victim than white murderers have to find a black victim, the low percentage of murderers in either population should, all else being equal, result in roughly the same percentage of inter-racial murder if murderers did not prejudice one race or the other. Indeed, given the segregation of the races in this country black murderers should rarely interact with white victims unless there was more of a deliberate targeting. That black murderers commit twice the rate of inter-racial murder as white murderers suggests to me that there is a greater likelihood of hate crimes being committed against white people by black people than the other way around. In terms of absolute numbers and proportional representation on the basis of population size, blacks are far more likely to kill a white person than the other way around.

    I appreciate your honesty in argumentation. But I do believe, on average, the statistics support the theory that white people have far more to fear from black people than the other way around. But if you listen to the media, you would believe the exact opposite.

    That is the point of this excellent article. The media lies about black criminality and it does not serve any legitimate purpose other than to convince us that they are despicable liars. Their lies perpetuate black antagonism towards whitey while deepening the divide in this country between the races.
  167. @Alden
    His father is Jewish. It's a common German and Jewish last name Every Zimmerman I have ever known is a Jew, not a goy of German descent. Of course the few zimnermans I've known doesn't mean much but the family made it clear Dad is Jewish I don't know in what if any religion they raised the children

    If he had used his Mom's Spanish name no one except for his town in Florida would have ever heard of the incident

    Someone mentioned Zimmerman was stalking Martin. Actually, Martin was stalking him and there is a cell phone recording to his friend that "Ima gooh geh
    duh muh fughin cracka " English translation I'm going to get the mother f..king cracker.

    Thanks. I had temembered that Zimmer means “room” in German but not, until I did the obvious that Zimmerman(n) means “carpenter”. Presuming that Zimmermann wasn’t the kind of Getman name forbidden to Jews (amusing that “Liechtenstein” wasn’t protected in the Hapsburg territories!) I wasn’t surprised to find that it is said to be likely to be Jewish in Israel but German in Kansas. By analogy Florida is with NYC and Woody Allen…

  168. @David In TN
    Did the "rise of Trump" inspire a black teen to burn alive an 85-year old white man named Gene Dacus recently in Birmingham, Alabama?

    You guys are obsessed by anecdotal evidence. You need to kick the habit.

    • Replies: @David In TN
    You refuse to face reality. You need to kick the habit.