The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
American Pravda: Holocaust Denial
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
EuropeanDenial

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Reason Magazine and Holocaust Denial

A few years ago I somehow heard about a ferocious online dispute involving a left-leaning journalist named Mark Ames and the editors of Reason magazine, the glossy flagship publication of America’s burgeoning libertarian movement. Although I was deep in my difficult programming work, curiosity got the better of me, so I decided to take a look.

During the Immigration Wars of the 1990s, I’d become quite friendly with the Reason people, frequently visiting their offices, especially during my “English” campaign of 1998, when I’d located my own political headquarters in the same small Westside LA office building they used. As my content-archiving software project began absorbing more and more of my time during the early 2000s, I’d gradually lost touch with them, but even so, the 40-odd years of their magazine archives had become the first publication I’d incorporated into my system, and I was now pleased to discover that both sides in the ongoing feud had put my system to good use in exploring those old Reason issues.

Apparently, the libertarians grouped around Reason had successfully been making political inroads into Silicon Valley’s enormously wealthy technology industry, and had now organized a major conference in San Francisco to gather together their supporters. Their left-leaning rivals decided to nip that project in the bud by highlighting some of the more unsavory ideological positions that mainstream libertarian leaders had once regularly espoused. Perhaps Ron Paul and other libertarians might oppose overseas wars and drug laws, and support cutting taxes and regulations, but they and their Republican Party allies were unspeakably vile on all sorts of other issues, and all “good thinkers” should therefore stay very far away.

The debate began in rather mundane fashion with an article by Ames entitled “Homophobia, Racism, and the Kochs” denouncing Reason for sharing a platform with a high-ranking Republican Congresswoman of Christian conservative views, as well as the magazine’s reliance upon Koch funding and its alleged support for Apartheid South Africa during the 1970s and 1980s. The response by the Reason editor seemed quite persuasive, and he rightfully dismissed the guilt-by-association attacks. He also outlined the gross errors and omissions in the charges regarding South Africa, and ridiculed Ames as a notoriously error-prone “conspiracy theorist.” Surely few outsiders would have paid any attention to such a typical exchange of mudslinging between rival ideological camps.

But then things took a very different turn, and a week later Ames returned with a 5,000 word article bearing a title sure to grab attention: “Holocaust Denial.” He claimed that in 1976 Reason had published an entire special issue devoted to that explosive topic.

Surely everyone on the Internet has encountered numerous instances of Holocaust Denial over the years, but for a respectable magazine to have allotted a full issue to promoting that doctrine was something else entirely. For decades, Hollywood has sanctified the Holocaust, and in our deeply secular society accusations of Holocaust Denial are a bit like shouting “Witch!” in Old Salem or leveling accusations of Trotskyism in the Court of the Red Czar. Progressive Sam Seder’s Majority Report radio show devoted a full half-hour segment to the charges against Reason, and Googling “Reason Magazine”+”Holocaust Denial” today yields thousands of hits. This substantial explosion of Internet controversy was what caught my own attention at the time.

My initial reaction was one of puzzlement. Reason had been the first periodical I had digitized in my system a dozen years earlier, and surely I would have noticed an entire issue promoting Holocaust Denial. However, I soon discovered that February 1976 had been excluded from the supposedly complete set the magazine had shipped me for processing, an omission that itself raises serious suspicions. But Ames had somehow located a copy in a research library and produced a full PDF, which he conveniently placed on the Internet to support his accusations.

 

Carefully reading his article and then glancing through the contents, I decided that his accusation was technically false but substantially true. Apparently the actual theme of the issue was “Historical Revisionism” and except for a couple of paragraphs buried here and there among the 76 pages, Holocaust Denial never came up, so characterizing it as a Holocaust Denial issue was obviously a grotesque exaggeration. But on the other hand, although few of the authors were familiar to me, it seemed undeniably true that they were numbered among America’s more prominent Holocaust Deniers, and most of them were deeply associated with organizations situated in that same camp. Furthermore, there were strong indications that their positions on that topic must certainly have been known to the Reason editors who commissioned their pieces.

The clearest case comes when Ames quoted the explicit statements of Dr. Gary North, a prominent libertarian thinker who had served as one of Ron Paul’s earliest Congressional aides and later became his longtime partner in politics and business:

Probably the most far-out materials on World War II revisionism have been the seemingly endless scholarly studies of the supposed execution of 6 million Jews by Hitler. The anonymous author [Hoggan] of ‘The Myth of the Six Million’ has presented a solid case against the Establishment’s favorite horror story—the supposed moral justification for our entry into the war…The untranslated books by the former Buchenwald inmate Prof. Paul Rassinier, have seriously challenged the story…A recent and very inexpensive book in magazine form, Did Six Million Really Die?, appeared in 1973, written by Richard Harwood.

A later issue carried a thousand word letter by Prof. Adam Reed of Rockefeller University, a past Reason contributor, strongly affirming the mainstream Holocaust narrative by quoting from standard works, and taking Dr. North to task for his citation of Holocaust Denial works of doubtful quality. But North firmly stood his ground:

“The second point, that about 6 million Jews really did die in the concentration camps, is one that will be open until the records of the period become fully available. I am not convinced yet, one way or the other. I am happy to have Dr. Reed’s interpretation of the data, but until the publishing companies and academic guild encourage the re-examination of the data, I shall continue to recommend that those interested in revisionist questions read The Myth of the Six Million and Did Six Million Really Die? as reasonable (though not necessarily irrefutable) pieces of historical revisionism. If a person can’t make up his mind, he should do more reading.”

Dr. James J. Martin was the lead contributor to the February Revisionism issue, and the preceding January issue had featured an extended Q&A by the editors, with one of the queries directly addressing the controversial topic:

REASON: Dr. Martin, do you believe (1) that the specific charge against the Nazis of having a mass extermination program of several million Jews is true, and (2) that the Allied atrocities were as great or greater than those of the Germans, from your study of the question?

MARTIN: Well, I never made a head count of all who lost their lives in the War-we’ve seen a wide variety of statistical materials, some of which have been pulled out of thin air. As a consequence, it’s hard to make any kind of estimate of this sort, whether ten more were killed on the one side or the other is not a particularly entrancing subject as far as I’m concerned. Whether allegations can be proven it remains to be seen. I don’t believe that the evidence of a planned extermination of the entire Jewish population of Europe is holding up. I have been influenced over the years by the works of Paul Rassinier, and he still has to be reckoned with. His works have been ignored for a long time, and sooner or later somebody’s going to have to do a decent job of coping with what he has presented. I think Rassinier’s general case is sound at the moment and I haven’t seen any strong evidence to upset his allegations or his assertions that there was no planned program for the extermination of European Jews. His other main case is that there were no gas chamber extermination programs. The fact that a great many people lost their lives is incontrovertible—that the German concentration camps weren’t health centers is well known-but they appear to have been far smaller and much less lethal than the Russian ones.

Another major contributor to the issue was Dr. Austin J. App, and just three years earlier he had published a short book bearing the lurid title The Six Million Swindle: Blackmailing the German People for Hard Marks with Fabricated Corpses.

In a follow-up column by Ames’ own editor, the stunned reactions of various journalists are listed, with one of them Tweeting out “I had no idea that Reason Magazine was once a haven for Holocaust Revisionism. Holy Moly.” Despite the angry obfuscations of present-day Reason staffers, this description seems quite correct.

Indeed, there seems considerable circumstantial evidence that around that time “Holocaust Skepticism” extended rather broadly within the entire nascent libertarian movement. Aside from the sharp critique of the aforementioned Prof. Reed, the overwhelming majority of the reader responses seemed totally favorable, with Samuel Konkin III, editor of New Libertarian Weekly and various similar publications, suggesting that the February issue was one of the best they had ever published. David Nolan, founder of America’s Libertarian Party, also praised the issue as “outstanding.”

The two editors of the issue in question even today remain quite prominent figures at Reason and within American libertarianism, while the masthead then carried names such as David Brudnoy and Alan Reynolds, who both later became influential figures in conservative and libertarian politics. There seems no evidence of any resignations or angry recriminations following the issue’s publication, which seems to have been digested with total equanimity, apparently arousing less rancor than might have been generated by a dispute over monetary policy.

I’d never paid much attention to Holocaust discussions over the years, but the name of Murray Rothbard on the 1976 Reason masthead prompted a memory. Rothbard is widely regarded as the founder of modern libertarianism, and I recalled in the 1990s reading somewhere that he had often ridiculed the Holocaust as being total nonsense, which had stuck in my mind as a typical example of libertarian eccentricity. A quick Google search seemed to confirm my recollection that Rothbard was an avowed Holocaust Denier.

 

Although the whole controversy regarding Reason’s editorial line of the mid-1970s soon died down, it remained a nagging puzzle in the back of my mind. I’d always been quite skeptical of libertarian ideology, but my Reason friends from the 1990s had certainly seemed like smart and rational people to me, hardly raving lunatics of any sort, and two of the ones I’d known best had been the co-editors of the controversial issue in question.

I could easily understand how zealous libertarian ideologues might be swept past the point of rationality on certain matters—perhaps arguing that the police and the army should be abolished as statist institutions—but the factual question of what had or had not happened to the Jews of Europe during World War II hardly fell into that sort of category. Furthermore, libertarianism had always attracted a very large Jewish contingent, especially in its upper ranks, and one of the issue editors came from that background, as did Rothbard and numerous others featured on the masthead. While deranged anti-Semitism is not impossible among Jews, I would think that it is somewhat less likely. Clearly something very odd must have been going on.

I was then too busy with my work to focus on the matter, but some months later I had more time, and began a detailed investigation. My first step was to carefully read the Reason articles produced by those controversial writers previously unknown to me. Although those pieces were not Holocaust-related, I thought they might give me a sense of their thinking.

To my surprise, the historiography seemed outstandingly good, and almost certainly accurate based on what I had picked up over the years from perfectly mainstream sources. Dr. Martin’s long article on the notorious framing of “Tokyo Rose” was probably the best and most comprehensive treatment I had ever encountered on that topic, and Dr. App’s analysis of the tragedy of the Sudeten-Germans was equally strong, raising several points I had previously not known. Percy Greaves effectively summarized many of the very suspicious aspects of the Pearl Harbor attack, and although his case for the prosecution against FDR was certainly not airtight, it accorded with the views presented by numerous scholars in other books on the subject. Moreover, his position was seconded by a young Bruce Bartlett, later a prominent Reagan and Bush official, and still later a strong Republican opponent of George W. Bush, routinely feted by the New York Times. Most of the other writings also seemed of very high quality, including Dr. North’s summary of World War II Revisionism. In general, the academic scholarship of those articles greatly surpassed anything found in opinion magazines of more recent decades, Reason itself included. Those so interested can click on the above links, read the articles in question, and decide for themselves.

Back then, Reason was a young and struggling magazine, with a shoestring staff and budget. Publishing articles of such obvious quality was surely a remarkable achievement for which the editors could feel justifiably proud, and the overwhelmingly positive letters they received seemed absolutely warranted. Meanwhile, the nasty attacks by Ames appeared to be those of a mere political hack who may not have even bothered actually reading the articles whose authors he vilified.

As a further sign of Ames’ dishonesty, he flung the epithet “Nazi” some two dozen times in his hack-job, along with numerous uses of “anti-Semitic” as well, and Greaves was certainly the subject of many of those slurs. But although Greaves and Bartlett wrote back-to-back articles on exactly the same Pearl Harbor topic, and according to Wikipedia, the former was the academic advisor to the latter on that subject, Bartlett’s name appears nowhere in Ames’s hit-piece, presumably because denouncing a prominent policy expert much beloved by the New York Times as an “anti-Semitic Neo-Nazi” might prove self-defeating. Even leaving that aside, accusing the Jewish libertarians running Reason of being Nazi propagandists must surely be the sort of charge that would strain the credulity of even the most gullible.

Deborah Lipstadt and Holocaust Denial

With Ames’ credibility totally shredded, I decided to carefully reread his article again, looking for what clues I could find to the whole bizarre situation. Academic scholars who publish very good history on certain subjects might still have totally irrational views on others, but normally one would assume otherwise.

It appeared that much of Ames’ understanding of the issue had come from a certain Deborah Lipstadt, whom he characterized as a great Holocaust expert. Her name was very vaguely familiar to me as some sort of academic activist, who years before had won a major legal victory over a rightwing British historian named David Irving, and Irving himself received further denunciations in the Ames article.

However, one name did stick out. Apparently based on Lipstadt’s information, Ames described Harry Elmer Barnes as “the godfather of American Holocaust denial literature” and Martin’s “Holocaust denial guru.”

A dozen years earlier, the name “Barnes” would have meant almost nothing to me. But as I produced my content-archiving system and digitized so many of America’s most influential publications of the last 150 years, I had soon discovered that many of our most illustrious public intellectuals—Left, Right, and Center—had been suddenly purged and “disappeared” around 1940 because of their stalwart opposition to FDR’s extremely aggressive foreign policy, and Barnes, an eminent historian and sociologist, had been among the most prominent of those. He had been one of the earliest editors at Foreign Affairs and for many years afterward his important articles had graced the pages of The New Republic and The Nation, while even after his fall, he had edited Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, an important 1953 collection of essays by himself and other once-prominent figures. But to have a figure of such intellectual stature accused of being a Holocaust Denier, let alone the “godfather” of the entire movement, seemed rather bizarre to me.

ORDER IT NOW

Since Ames was merely an ignorant political hack transmitting the opinions of others, I moved on Lipstadt, his key source. Anyone who has spent much time on the comment-threads of relatively unfiltered websites has certainly encountered the controversial topic of Holocaust Denial, but I now decided to try to investigate the issue in much more serious fashion. A few clicks on the Amazon.com website, and her 1993 book Denying the Holocaust arrived in my mailbox a couple of days later, providing me an entrance into the mysterious world.

Reading the book was certainly a tremendous revelation to me. Lipstadt is a professor of Holocaust Studies with an appointment in Emory University’s Department of Theology, and once I read the opening paragraph of her first chapter, I decided that her academic specialty might certainly be described as “Holocaust Theology.”

The producer was incredulous. She found it hard to believe that I was turning down an opportunity to appear on her nationally televised show. “But you are writing a book on this topic. It will be great publicity.” I explained repeatedly that I would not participate in a debate with a Holocaust denier. The existence of the Holocaust was not a matter of debate. I would analyze and illustrate who they were and what they tried to do, but I would not appear with them…Unwilling to accept my no as final, she vigorously condemned Holocaust denial and all it represented. Then, in one last attempt to get me to change my mind, she asked me a question: “I certainly don’t agree with them, but don’t you think our viewers should hear the other side?”

Lipstadt’s absolute horror at having someone actually dispute the tenets of her academic doctrine could not have been more blatant. Surely no zealous theologian of the European Dark Ages would have reacted any differently.

The second chapter of her book supported that impression. Since many of the individuals she castigates as Holocaust Deniers also supported the Revisionist perspective of the underlying causes of the First and Second World Wars, she harshly attacked those schools, but in rather strange fashion. In recent years, blogger Steve Sailer and others have ridiculed what they describe as the “point-and-sputter” style of debate, in which a “politically-incorrect” narrative is merely described and then automatically treated as self-evidently false without any accompanying need for actual refutation. This seemed to be the approach that Lipstadt took throughout her rather short book.

For example, she provided a very long list of leading academic scholars, prominent political figures, and influential journalists who had championed Revisionist history, noted that their views disagree with the more mainstream perspective she had presumably imbibed from her History 101 textbooks, and thereby regarded them as fully debunked. Certainly a Christian preacher attempting to refute the evolutionary theories of Harvard’s E.O. Wilson by quoting a passage of Bible verse might take much the same approach. But few evangelical activists would be so foolish as to provide a very long list of eminent scientists who all took the same Darwinist position and then attempt to sweep them aside by citing a single verse from Genesis. Lipstadt seems to approach history much like a Bible-thumper, but a particularly dim-witted one. Moreover, many of the authors she attacked had already become familiar to me after a decade of my content-archiving work, and I had found their numerous books quite scholarly and persuasive.

Barnes, in particular, figured quite prominently in Lipstadt’s chapter and throughout her book. The index listed his name on more than two dozen pages, and he is repeatedly described as the “godfather” of Holocaust Denial, and its seminal figure. Given such heavy coverage, I eagerly examined all those references and the accompanying footnotes to uncover the shocking statements he must have made during his very long scholarly career.

I was quite disappointed. There is not a single reference I could find to his supposed Holocaust Denial views until just the year before his death at age 79, and even that item is hardly what I had been led to believe. In a 9,300 word article on Revisionism for a libertarian publication, he ridicules a leading Holocaust source for claiming that Hitler had killed 25 million Jews, noting that total was nearly twice their entire worldwide population at the time. In addition, Barnes several times applied the word “allegedly” to the stories of the Nazi extermination scheme, an sacrilegious attitude that appears to have horrified a theologian such as Lipstadt. Finally, in a short, posthumously published review of a book by French scholar Paul Rassiner, Barnes found his estimate of just 1 million to 1.5 million Jewish deaths quite convincing, but his tone suggested that he had never previously investigated the matter himself.

So although that last item technically validated Lipstadt’s accusation that Barnes was a Holocaust Denier, her evidence-free claims that he was the founder and leader of the field hardly enhances her scholarly credibility. Meanwhile, all the many tens of thousands of words I have read by Barnes has suggested that he was a careful and dispassionate historian.

A notorious incident that occurred soon after the Bolshevik Revolution came to my mind. Eminent philologist Timofei Florinsky, one of Russia’s most internationally renowned academic scholars, was hauled before a revolutionary tribunal for a public interrogation about his ideas, and one of the judges, a drunken Jewish former prostitute, found his answers so irritating that she drew her revolver and shot him dead right there and then. Given Lipstadt’s obvious emotional state, I have a strong suspicion that she might have wished she could deal in a similar fashion with Barnes and the numerous other scholars she denounced. Among other things, she noted with horror that more than two decades after his 1940 purge from public life, Barnes’ books were still required reading at both Harvard and Columbia.

 

All of us reasonably extrapolate what we already know or can easily check against what is more difficult to verify, and the remaining chapters of Lipstadt’s book left me very doubtful about the reliability of her work, all of which was written in a similar near-hysterical style. Since she had already been vaguely known to me from her well-publicized legal battle against historian David Irving more than a dozen years earlier, I was hardly surprised to discover that many pages were devoted to vilifying and insulting him in much the same manner as Barnes, so I decided to investigate that case.

I was only slightly surprised to discover that Irving had been one of the world’s most successful World War II historians, whose remarkable documentary findings had completely upended our knowledge of that conflict and its origins, with his books selling in the many millions. His entire approach to controversial historical issues was to rely as much as possible upon hard documentary evidence, and his total inability to locate any such documents relating to the Holocaust drove Lipstadt and her fellow ethnic-activists into a frenzy of outrage, so after many years of effort they finally managed to wreck his career. Out of curiosity, I read a couple of his shorter books, which seemed absolutely outstanding historiography, written in a very measured tone, quite different from that of Lipstadt, whose own 2005 account of her legal triumph over Irving, History on Trial, merely confirmed my opinion of her incompetence.

ORDER IT NOW

Lipstadt’s first book Beyond Belief, published in 1986, tells an interesting story as well, with her descriptive subtitle being “The American Press and the Coming of the Holocaust, 1933-1945.” Much of the volume consists of press clippings from the American print media of that era interspersed with her running rather hysterical commentary, but providing little analysis or judgment. Some of the journalists reported horrifying conditions for Jews in pre-war Germany while others claim that such stories were wildly exaggerated, and Lipstadt automatically praised the former and denounced the latter without providing any serious explanation.

Lenni Brenner’s remarkable book Zionism in the Age of the Dictators had been published three years earlier. Although I only discovered it very recently, surely any half-competent specialist in her own topic would have noticed it, yet Lipstadt provided no hint of its existence. Perhaps the reality of the important Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s, with Nazi officials traveling to Palestine as honored Zionist guests and leading Nazi newspapers praising the Zionist enterprise might have complicated her simple story of fanatic German Jew-hatred under Hitler steadily rising towards an exterminationist pitch. Her faculty appointment in a Department of Theology seems very apt.

Lipstadt’s wartime coverage is just as bad, perhaps worse. She catalogs perhaps a couple of hundred print news reports, each describing the massacre of hundreds of thousands or even millions of Jews by the Nazis. But she expresses her outrage that so many of these reports were buried deep within the inside pages of newspapers, a placement suggesting that they were regarded as hysterical wartime atrocity propaganda and probably fictional, with the editors sometimes explicitly stating that opinion. Indeed, among these under-emphasized stories was the claim that the Germans had recently killed 1.5 million Jews by individually injecting each one of them in the heart with a lethal drug. And although I don’t see any mention of it, around that same time America’s top Jewish leader Rabbi Stephen Wise was peddling the absurd report that the Nazis had slaughtered millions of Jews, turning their skins into lampshades and rendering their bodies into soap. Obviously, separating truth from falsehood during a blizzard of wartime propaganda is not nearly as easy as Lipstadt seems to assume.

Ordinary Americans were apparently even more skeptical than newspaper editors. According to Lipstadt:

Writing in the Sunday New York Times Magazine, [Arthur] Koestler cited public opinion polls in the United States in which nine of ten average Americans dismissed the accusations against the Nazis as propaganda lies and flatly stated that they did not believe a word of them.

Lipstadt convincingly demonstrates that very few Americans seem to have believed in the reality of the Holocaust during the Second World War itself, despite considerable efforts by agitated Jewish activists to persuade them. Over the years, I have seen mention of numerous other books making this same basic point, and therefore harshly condemning the American political leaders of the time for having failed “to save the Jews.”

Explicit and Implicit Holocaust Denial After World War II

Yet as I began further investigating the history of Holocaust Denial in the wake of the Reason contretemps, I was very surprised to discover that this same pattern of widespread disbelief in the Holocaust seems to have continued unabated after the end of the war and throughout the 1950s, being especially strong among high-ranking American military figures, especially top generals and individuals with an Intelligence background, who seemingly would have had the best knowledge of the true events.

ORDER IT NOW

Some years ago, I came across a totally obscure 1951 book entitled Iron Curtain Over America by John Beaty, a well-regarded university professor. Beaty had spent his wartime years in Military Intelligence, being tasked with preparing the daily briefing reports distributed to all top American officials summarizing available intelligence information acquired during the previous 24 hours, which was obviously a position of considerable responsibility.

As a zealous anti-Communist, he regarded much of America’s Jewish population as deeply implicated in subversive activity, therefore constituting a serious threat to traditional American freedoms. In particular, the growing Jewish stranglehold over publishing and the media was making it increasingly difficult for discordant views to reach the American people, with this regime of censorship constituting the “Iron Curtain” described in his title. He blamed Jewish interests for the totally unnecessary war with Hitler’s Germany, which had long sought good relations with America, but instead had suffered total destruction for its strong opposition to Europe’s Jewish-backed Communist menace.

Beaty also sharply denounced American support for the new state of Israel, which was potentially costing us the goodwill of so many millions of Muslims and Arabs. And as a very minor aside, he also criticized the Israelis for continuing to claim that Hitler had killed six million Jews, a highly implausible accusation that had no apparent basis in reality and seemed to be just a fraud concocted by Jews and Communists, aimed at poisoning our relations with postwar Germany and extracting money for the Jewish State from the long-suffering German people.

He was scathing toward the Nuremberg Trials, which he described as a “major indelible blot” upon America and “a travesty of justice.” According to him, the proceedings were dominated by vengeful German Jews, many of whom engaged in falsification of testimony or even had criminal backgrounds. As a result, this “foul fiasco” merely taught Germans that “our government had no sense of justice.” Sen. Robert Taft, the Republican leader of the immediate postwar era took a very similar position, which later won him the praise of John F. Kennedy in Profiles in Courage. The fact that the chief Soviet prosecutor at Nuremberg had played the same role during the notorious Stalinist show trials of the late 1930s, during which numerous Old Bolsheviks confessed to all sorts of absurd and ridiculous things, hardly enhanced the credibility of the proceedings to many outside observers.

Then as now, a book taking such controversial positions stood little chance of finding a mainstream New York publisher, but it was soon released by a small Dallas firm, and then became enormously successful, going through some seventeen printings over the next few years. According to Scott McConnell, founding editor of The American Conservative, Beaty’s book became the second most popular conservative text of the 1950s, ranking only behind Russell Kirk’s iconic classic, The Conservative Mind.

Moreover, although Jewish groups including the ADL harshly condemned the book, especially in their private lobbying, those efforts provoked a backlash, and numerous top American generals, both serving and retired, wholeheartedly endorsed Beaty’s work, denouncing the ADL efforts at censorship and urging all Americans to read the volume. Although Beaty’s quite explicit Holocaust Denial might shock tender modern sensibilities, at the time it seems to have caused barely a ripple of concern and was almost totally ignored even by the vocal Jewish critics of the work.

ORDER IT NOW

Much of this very interesting story is told by Joseph Bendersky, an expert in Holocaust Studies, who devoted ten years of archival research to his 2000 book The “Jewish Threat.” His work chronicles the extremely widespread anti-Semitism found within the U.S. Army and Military Intelligence throughout the first half of the twentieth century, with Jews being widely regarded as posing a serious security risk. The book runs well over 500 pages, but when I consulted the index I found no mention of the Rosenbergs nor Harry Dexter White nor any of the other very numerous Jewish spies revealed by the Venona Decrypts, and the term “Venona” itself is also missing from the index. Reports of the overwhelmingly Jewish leadership of the Russian Bolsheviks are mostly treated as bigotry and paranoia, as are descriptions of the similar ethnic skew of America’s own Communist Party, let alone the heavy financial support of the Bolsheviks by Jewish international bankers. At one point, he dismisses the link between Jews and Communism in Germany by noting that “less than half” of the Communist Party leadership was Jewish; but since fewer than one in a hundred Germans came from that ethnic background, Jews were obviously over-represented among Communist leaders by as much as 5,000%. This seems to typify the sort of dishonesty and innumeracy I have regularly encountered among Jewish Holocaust experts.

Meanwhile, with the copyright having long lapsed, I’m pleased to add Beaty’s work to my Controversial HTML Books selection, so individuals interested can read it and decide for themselves:

 

Beaty’s very brief 1951 discussion has been the earliest instance of explicit Holocaust Denial I have managed to locate, but the immediate postwar years seem absolutely rife with what might be described as “implicit Holocaust Denial,” especially within the highest political circles.

Over the years, Holocaust scholars and activists have very rightfully emphasized the absolutely unprecedented nature of the historical events they have studied. They describe how some six million innocent Jewish civilians were deliberately exterminated, mostly in gas chambers, by one of Europe’s most highly cultured nations, and emphasize that monstrous project was often accorded greater priority than Germany’s own wartime military needs during the country’s desperate struggle for survival. Furthermore, the Germans also undertook enormous efforts to totally eliminate all possible traces of their horrifying deed, with huge resources expended to cremate all those millions of bodies and scatter the ashes. This same disappearance technique was even sometimes applied to the contents of their mass graves, which were dug up long after initial burial, so that the rotting corpses could then be totally incinerated and all evidence eliminated. And although Germans are notorious for their extreme bureaucratic precision, this immense wartime project was apparently implemented without benefit of a single written document, or at least no such document has ever been located.

Lipstadt entitled her first book “Beyond Belief,” and I think that all of us can agree that the historical event she and so many others in academia and Hollywood have made the centerpiece of their lives and careers is certainly one of the most very remarkable occurrences in all of human history. Indeed, perhaps only a Martian Invasion would have been more worthy of historical study, but Orson Welles’s famous War of the Worlds radio-play which terrified so many millions of Americans in 1938 turned out to be a hoax rather than real.

The six million Jews who died in the Holocaust certainly constituted a very substantial fraction of all the wartime casualties in the European Theater, outnumbering by a factor of 100 all the British who died during the Blitz, and being dozens of times more numerous than all the Americans who fell there in battle. Furthermore, the sheer monstrosity of the crime against innocent civilians would surely have provided the best possible justification for the Allied war effort. Yet for many, many years after the war, a very strange sort of amnesia seems to have gripped most of the leading political protagonists in that regard.

Robert Faurisson, a French academic who became a prominent Holocaust Denier in the 1970s, once made an extremely interesting observation regarding the memoirs of Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle:

Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s The Second World War (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959). In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.

Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.

Given that the Holocaust would reasonably rank as the single most remarkable episode of the Second World War, such striking omissions must almost force us to place Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle among the ranks of “implicit Holocaust Deniers.”

 

ORDER IT NOW

Many others seem to fall into that same category. In 1981, Lucy S. Dawidowicz, a leading Holocaust scholar, published a short book entitled The Holocaust and the Historians, in which she denounced so many prominent historians for having so totally ignored the reality of the Holocaust for many years following World War II. Indeed, discussion of that topic was almost entirely confined to the Jewish Studies programs which Jewish ethnic activists had newly established at numerous universities throughout the country. Although Lipstadt’s poor scholarly habits and hysterical style hardly impressed me, she appears to have been among the most successful academics who began a career in those ethnic studies departments, which suggests that their average quality was far below her own.

Meanwhile, Dawidowicz emphasizes that mainstream histories often entirely omitted the Holocaust from their presentations:

But it is plain from the most cursory review of textbooks and scholarly works by English and American historians that the awesome events of the Holocaust have not been given their historic due. For over two decades some secondary school and college texts never mentioned the subject at all, while others treated it so summarily or vaguely as to fail to convey sufficient information about the events themselves or their historical significance.

With regard to serious scholarship, she notes that when Friedrich Meinecke, universally acknowledged as Germany’s most eminent historian, published The German Catastrophe in 1946, he harshly denounced Hitler as the leader of “a band of criminals” but made absolutely no mention of the Holocaust, which surely would have represented the height of such criminality. Major British accounts of Hitler and World War II by leading historians such as A.J.P. Taylor, H.R. Trevor-Roper, and Alan Bullock were almost as silent. A similar situation occurred in America as late as 1972 when the massive 1,237 page Columbia History of the World, having a Jewish co-editor, devoted a full chapter to World War II but confined its discussion of the Holocaust to just two short and somewhat ambiguous sentences. One almost gets a sense that many of these experienced professional historians treated discussion of the Holocaust as a considerable embarrassment, a subject that they sought to avoid or at least completely minimize.

Dawidowicz even castigates Slaughterhouse-Five, the 1969 fictional masterpiece by Kurt Vonnegut, for its bald assertion that the firebombing of Dresden was “the greatest massacre in European history,” a claim that seems to reduce the Holocaust to non-existence.

I myself had noticed something similar just a couple of years before Dawidowicz’s book appeared. The English translation of German journalist Joachim Fest’s widely praised Hitler had been published in 1974 and I had read it a few years later, finding it just as excellent as the critics had indicated. But I remember being a little puzzled that the 800 page book contained no more than a couple of pages discussing the Nazi death camps and the word “Jews” never even appeared in the index.

The vast majority of Hitler’s Jewish victims came from Russia and the Eastern European nations included in the Soviet Bloc. That was also the location of all the extermination camps that are the central focus of Holocaust scholars, and therefore the Soviets were the source of most of the key evidence used at the Nuremberg Trials. Yet Dawidowicz notes that after Stalin grew increasingly suspicious of Jews and Israel a few years after the end of the war, virtually all mention of the Holocaust and German wartime atrocities against Jews vanished from the Soviet media and history books. A similar process occurred in the Warsaw Pact satellites, even while the top Communist Party leadership of many of those countries often remained very heavily Jewish for some years. Indeed, I recall reading quite a number of newspaper articles mentioning that after the Berlin Wall fell and the sundered halves of Europe were finally reunited, most Eastern Europeans had never even heard of the Holocaust.

These days, my morning newspapers seem to carry Holocaust-related stories with astonishing frequency, and probably no event of the twentieth century looms so large in our public consciousness. According to public survey data, even as far back as 1995, some 97% of Americans knew of the Holocaust, far more than were aware of the Pearl Harbor attack or America’s use of the atomic bombs against Japan, while less than half our citizenry were aware that the Soviet Union had been our wartime ally. But I’d suspect that anyone who drew his knowledge from the mainstream newspapers and history books during the first couple of decades after the end of the Second World War might never have even been aware that any Holocaust had actually occurred.

ORDER IT NOW

In 1999 Peter Novick published a book on this general theme entitled The Holocaust in American Life, citing that survey, and his introduction began by noting the very strange pattern the Holocaust exhibited in its cultural influence, which seems quite unique among all major historical events. In the case of almost all other searing historical occurrences such as the massive bloodshed of the Somme or the bitter Vietnam War, their greatest impact upon popular consciousness and media came soon afterward, with the major books and films often appearing within the first five or ten years when memories were fresh, and the influence peaking within a couple of decades, after which they were gradually forgotten.

Yet in the case of the Holocaust, this pattern was completely reversed. Hardly anyone discussed it for the first twenty years after the end of the World War II, while it gradually moved to the center of American life in the 1970s, just as wartime memories were fading and many of the most prominent and knowledgeable figures from that era had departed the scene. Novick cites numerous studies and surveys demonstrating that this lack of interest and visibility certainly included the Jewish community itself, which had seemingly suffered so greatly under those events, yet apparently had almost completely forgotten about them during the 1950s and much of the 1960s.

I can certainly confirm that impression from my personal experience. Prior to the mid- or late-1970s, I had had only the vaguest impression that virtually all the Jews and Gypsies of Europe had been exterminated during the Second World War, and although the term “Holocaust” was in widespread use, it invariably referred to a “Nuclear Holocaust,” a term long-since supplanted and scarcely used today. Then, after the Berlin Wall fell, I was quite surprised to discover that Eastern Europe was still filled with vast numbers of unexterminated Gypsies, who quickly flooded into the West and provoked all sorts of political controversies.

The Rediscovery of the Holocaust

The late scholar Raul Hilberg is universally acknowledged as the founder of modern Holocaust studies, which began with the 1961 publication of his massive volume The Destruction of the European Jews. In his very interesting 2007 Hilberg obituary, historian Norman Finkelstein emphasizes that prior to Hilberg’s work, there had been virtually no writing on the Holocaust, and discussion of the topic was considered almost “taboo.” For a recent event of such apparent enormity to have been so completely wiped away from public discussion and the consciousness of historians and political scientists can be explained in several different ways. But once I began to investigate the circumstances behind Hilberg’s ground-breaking work, I encountered all sorts of strange ironies.

According to Wikipedia, Hilberg’s family of Austrian Jews coincidentally arrived in the United States on the exact day in 1939 that war broke out, and in his early teens he was soon horrified to read all the news reports of the ongoing extermination of his fellow Jews in the continent his family had left behind, even telephoning Jewish leaders asking why they were doing so little to save their kinsmen from annihilation. He subsequently served in the U.S. military in Europe, then majored in Political Science at Brooklyn College after the end of the conflict. The inspiration for his future scholarly focus seems to have come when he was shocked by a remark made by one of his lecturers, Hans Rosenberg:

The most wicked atrocities perpetrated on a civilian population in modern times occurred during the Napoleonic occupation of Spain.

When Hilberg asked how Rosenberg, himself a German-Jewish refugee, could have so totally ignored the murder of 6 million Jews, a monstrous crime committed just a couple of years earlier, Rosenberg sought to deflect the question, saying that “it was a complicated matter” and “history doesn’t teach down into the present age.” Since Rosenberg was a student of Meinecke, whom Lipstadt has bitterly denounced as an implicit Holocaust Denier, one wonders whether Rosenberg may have shared the beliefs of his mentor but was reluctant to admit that fact to his overwhelmingly Jewish students in emotionally-charged postwar Brooklyn.

Later, Hilberg conducted his doctoral research at Columbia under Franz Neumann, another German-Jewish refugee scholar. But when Hilberg indicated he wanted his research to focus on the extermination of Europe’s Jews, Neumann strongly discouraged that topic, warning Hilberg that doing so would be professionally imprudent and might become “his academic funeral.” When he attempted to publish his research in book form, it received numerous negative reviews, with Israel’s Yad Vashem fearing it would encounter “hostile criticism,” and over a six year period, it was rejected by several major publishing houses along with Princeton University, based on the advice of the influential Jewish intellectual Hannah Arendt. One naturally wonders whether all these established scholars may have quietly known something that a naive young doctoral candidate such as Hilberg did not. His book only appeared in print because a Jewish immigrant whose business had suffered under the Nazis funded the entire publication.

 

I’d never paid much attention to Holocaust issues, but the supporters of my local Palo Alto Library operate a monthly book sale, and with serious nonfiction hardcovers often priced at just a quarter each, my personal library has grown by hundreds of volumes over the years, now including several of the thickest and most influential Holocaust texts. Aside from Hilberg’s classic volume, these include Nora Levin’s The Holocaust (1968), Lucy Dawidowicz’s The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945 (1975), Martin Gilbert’s The Holocaust (1985), and Daniel Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners (1996).

I claim absolutely no expertise in Holocaust issues, and analyzing the evidence and argumentation these voluminous works offer is entirely beyond my ability. But I decided to attempt to assess their overall credibility by exploring a few particular items, without actually bothering to read the thousands of pages of text they provided.

Consider the interesting case of Field Marshal Erhard Milch, Hermann Goering’s very powerful number-two in the German Luftwaffe. His father was certainly a Jew, and according to researchers Robert Wistrich and Louis Snyder, there is archival evidence that his mother was Jewish as well. Now is it certainly not impossible that a Third Reich supposedly dedicated with grim fanaticism to the extermination of each and every Jew might have spent the entire war with a full- or half-Jew near the absolute top of its military hierarchy, but surely that puzzling anomaly would warrant careful explanation, and Milch’s apparent Jewish background was certainly known during the Nuremberg Trials.

Yet when I carefully consulted the very comprehensive indexes of those five books, totaling over 3,500 pages, there is virtually no discussion of Milch, except a few very brief mentions of his name in connection with various military operations. Either the authors were unaware of Milch’s Jewish background, or perhaps they hoped to keep that fact away from their readers lest it cause “confusion.” Neither of these possibilities enhances the trust we should place in their research skills or their scholarly objectivity.

Indeed, the fascinating and widely-praised 2002 book Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg notes that aside from Milch, Hitler’s military contained over a dozen half-Jewish generals and admirals and another dozen quarter-Jews of that same high rank, plus a total of roughly 150,000 additional half- or quarter-Jewish soldiers, with a large fraction of these being officers. All of these individuals would have had some fully-Jewish parents or grand-parents, which seems decidedly odd behavior for a regime supposedly so focused on the total eradication of the Jewish race.

Another obvious matter casts further doubt upon the historical quality of those five immensely thick volumes of standard Holocaust narrative, which together occupy nearly a linear foot on my bookshelves. For prosecutors of any crime, establishing a plausible motive is certainly an important goal, and in the case of the Jewish Holocaust, these authors would seem to have an easy task at hand. Hitler and his German colleagues had always claimed that the Jews overwhelmingly dominated Bolshevik Communism, and much of their struggle against the former was in order to prevent further bloody deeds of the latter. So surely devoting an early chapter or so to describing this central Nazi doctrine would provide an airtight explanation of what drove the Nazis to their fiendish slaughters, rendering fully explicable the horrifying events that would occupy the remainder of their text.

Yet oddly enough, an examination of their indexes for “Bolsheviks,” “Communism,” and all variants reveals almost no discussion of this important issue. Goldhagen’s 1996 book provides just a couple of short sentences spread across his 600 pages, and the other works seem to contain virtually nothing at all. Since all of these Holocaust books almost totally avoid Hitler’s self-declared motive for his anti-Jewish actions, they are forced to desperately search for alternative explanations, seeking clues buried deep within the German past or turning to psychanalytical speculations or perhaps deciding that what they describe as the greatest massacre in all human history was undertaken out of sheer Nazi wickedness.

The obvious reason for this glaring omission is that the authors are constructing a morality-play in which the Jews must be portrayed as absolutely blameless victims, and even hinting at their role in the numerous Communist atrocities that long preceded the rise of the Third Reich might cause readers to consider both sides of the issue. When purported historians go to absurd lengths to hide such glaring facts, they unmask themselves as propagandists, and we must be very cautious about trusting their reliability and candor in all other matters, whether great or small.

 

Indeed, the issue of Communism raises a far larger matter, one having rather touchy implications. Sometimes two simple compounds are separately inert, but when combined together may possess tremendous explosive force. From my introductory history classes and readings in high school, certain things had always seemed glaringly obvious to me even if the conclusions remained unmentionable, and I once assumed they were just as apparent to most others as well. But over the years I have begun to wonder whether perhaps this might not be correct.

Back in those late Cold War days, the death toll of innocent civilians from the Bolshevik Revolution and the first two decades of the Soviet Regime was generally reckoned at running well into the tens of millions when we include the casualties of the Russian Civil War, the government-induced famines, the Gulag, and the executions. I’ve heard that these numbers have been substantially revised downwards to perhaps as little as twenty million or so, but no matter. Although determined Soviet apologists may dispute such very large figures, they have always been part of the standard narrative history taught within the West.

Meanwhile, all historians know perfectly well that the Bolshevik leaders were overwhelmingly Jewish, with three of the five revolutionaries Lenin named as his plausible successors coming from that background. Although only around 4% of Russia’s population was Jewish, a few years ago Vladimir Putin stated that Jews constituted perhaps 80-85% of the early Soviet government, an estimate fully consistent with the contemporaneous claims of Winston Churchill, Times of London correspondent Robert Wilton, and the officers of American Military Intelligence. Recent books by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Yuri Slezkine, and others have all painted a very similar picture. And prior to World War II, Jews remained enormously over-represented in the Communist leadership, especially dominating the Gulag administration and the top ranks of the dreaded NKVD.

Both of these simple facts have been widely accepted in America throughout my entire lifetime. But combine them together with the relatively tiny size of worldwide Jewry, around 16 million prior to World War II, and the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close. And yet, by the astonishing alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years have somehow been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a transformation so seemingly implausible that future generations will surely be left gasping in awe.

Today’s American Neocons are just as heavily Jewish as were the Bolsheviks of a hundred years ago, and they have greatly benefited from the political immunity provided by this totally bizarre inversion of historical reality. Partly as a consequence of their media-fabricated victimhood status, they have managed to seize control over much of our political system, especially our foreign policy, and have spent the last few years doing their utmost to foment an absolutely insane war with nuclear-armed Russia. If they do manage to achieve that unfortunate goal, they will surely outdo the very impressive human body-count racked up by their ethnic ancestors, perhaps even by an order-of-magnitude or more.

Holocaust Frauds and Confusions

Since the Holocaust only became a major public topic after wartime memories had grown dim, the story has always seemed to suffer from the problems traditionally associated with “recovered memory syndrome.” Truths and falsehoods were often mixed together in strange ways, and the door was opened wide to an astonishing number of outright frauds and liars.

For example, in the late 1970s I remember many of my high school classmates devouring The Painted Bird by Jerzy Kosinski, perhaps the first widely popular Holocaust memoir. But then a few years later, the media revealed that Kosinski’s national best-seller was simply fraudulent, and the plagiarizing author eventually committed suicide. Indeed, there have been so many fake Holocaust memoirs over the years that they nearly constitute a literary genre of their own.

Probably the most world’s most famous Holocaust survivor was Elie Wiesel, who parlayed the stories of his wartime suffering into becoming an enormous political celebrity. His career was capped with a Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, and the announcement declared him “a messenger to mankind.” Yet journalist Alexander Cockburn has persuasively argued that Wiesel was simply a fraud, and his famous autobiographical work Night just another literary hoax.

Although the iconic figure of “the Six Million” has been endlessly repeated by our media, the estimated numbers of the dead have actually been shockingly variable over the years. Although I never paid much attention to Holocaust issues, I have closely read my major newspapers and magazines for decades, and had regularly seen the statement that the Nazi death machine had brutally exterminated five million Gentiles along with the six million Jews. But just last year, I was stunned to discover that former total was simply a whole-cloth invention by prominent Holocaust-activist Simon Wiesenthal, who simply made the figure up one day with the intent of giving non-Jews more of a stake in the Holocaust story. And despite being based on absolutely no evidence or research, his casual claim was never effectively refuted by actual Holocaust scholars, who knew it to be total nonsense, and therefore it was so regularly repeated in the media that I probably read it hundreds of times over the years, always assuming it had some firm grounding in proven reality.

Similarly, for decades I had always read the undeniable fact that the Nazis had exterminated 4 million inmates at Auschwitz, with most of the victims being Jews, and Lipstadt certainly treated that number as absolutely rock-solid historical reality. But in the early 1990s after the fall of Communism, the official total was quietly revised downwards to as little as 1.1 million. The fact that a sudden reduction in the official Holocaust body-count by 3 million has had so little impact upon our public Holocaust media narrative hardly seems to inspire great confidence in either the total figures or the media reporting of them.

Over the last couple of generations, our media has engraved that figure of Six Million so deeply onto the minds of every Western citizen that the meaning of the iconic number is universally understood, and those who question it risk a prison sentence in many European countries. Yet its actual origin is somewhat obscure. According to some accounts, Jewish groups lobbied President Truman into casually inserting it into one of his speeches, and thereafter it has endlessly echoed in the media down to the present day. Some angry Internet activist has put together a graphic displaying extracts from dozens of New York Times stories between 1869 and 1941 all citing the figure of 6 million Eastern European Jews as being threatened with death, suggesting that our official Holocaust body-count actually predated World War II by as much as three generations. I really wouldn’t be surprised if that might be the original source of the number.

Sometimes the creation of a new Holocaust hoax was only narrowly averted. Throughout most of the twentieth century, Jews and blacks had been close political allies in America, with the top leadership of the NAACP almost invariably being Jewish, as were nearly all of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s top white advisors and a very large fraction of the key white activists involved in the black Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s. But by the late 1960s, a schism had erupted, with many younger black activists becoming deeply hostile to what they perceived as overwhelming Jewish influence, while more militant blacks, whether Muslim or otherwise, began siding with the Palestinians against Zionist Israel. This growing conflict became especially bitter during Jesse Jackson’s presidential campaign of 1988 and reached a flash-point in the New York City of the early 1990s.

A couple of film-makers sought to help heal this rift by producing a major 1992 PBS documentary entitled The Liberators, recounting how black American troops had been among the first units that captured the Buchenwald and Dachau concentration camps, thereby freeing the tens of thousands of Jewish inmates from Nazi captivity. A historical narrative of such deep symbolic resonance quickly attracted overwhelming support from both black leaders and Jewish ones, with Jesse Jackson sharing the stage with Holocaust survivors and numerous Jewish luminaries at the Harlem premiere, and the film received an Oscar nomination. However, in early Febuary 1993 Jeffrey Goldberg took to the pages of The New Republic to reveal that the story was merely a hoax, based on falsified history. Although the film’s Jewish co-producer angrily denounced her critics as racists and Holocaust Deniers, those charges stuck, and were eventually reported in the New York Times and other major media outlets. The leading Jewish organizations and Holocaust centers that had been heavily promoting the film soon distanced themselves, and in 2013 The Times of Israel even marked the twenty-year anniversary of what it described as a notorious hoax. But I suspect that if matters had gone a little differently, the story might soon have become so deeply embedded in the canonical Holocaust narrative that anyone questioning the facts would have been vilified as a racist.

 

A few years earlier, The New Republic had actually been in the forefront of promoting a different hoax also relating to Jewish issues, one which might have had far greater international political significance when Joan Peters, an obscure Jewish writer, published a major historical work in 1984. She claimed that her extensive archival research had revealed that the bulk of the present-day Palestinians were actually not native to Palestine, but instead were recently-arrived immigrants, drawn there by the heavy economic development produced by the Zionist settlers who had actually preceded them.

Her shocking findings received hundreds of glowing reviews and academic endorsements across the entire spectrum of the mainstream and elite American media, and her book quickly became a huge bestseller. Leading Jewish Holocaust luminaries such as Dawidowicz and Wiesel took center stage in praising her remarkable scholarship, which seemed likely to completely demolish the claims of the expelled Palestinians, thereby reshaping the nature of the Middle East conflict to Israel’s great advantage.

ORDER IT NOW

However, a young graduate student in History at Princeton named Norman Finkelstein had considerable interest in the history of Zionism, and being very much surprised by her findings, decided to investigate those claims. Once he began carefully checking her footnotes and her alleged sources, he discovered they were entirely fraudulent, and her groundbreaking research merely amounted to a hoax, which some later suggested had been concocted by an intelligence organization and merely published under her name.

Although Finkelstein widely distributed his important findings, they were totally ignored by all the American journalists, scholars, and media organizations he contacted, with the sole exception of Noam Chomsky, and the growing Joan Peters Hoax might have destroyed the legal basis of the international Palestinian claims to their own Palestine homeland. But some independent-minded British publications eventually picked up his information, and the resulting wave of media embarrassment caused the Peters claims to fade into oblivion. Meanwhile, Finkelstein himself suffered severe retaliation as a consequence, and according to Chomsky was completely blacklisted by his Princeton department and the wider academic community.

ORDER IT NOW

More than a dozen years later, Finkelstein’s work became the focus of a second major controversy. In the late 1990s, international Jewish organizations launched a major effort to extract many billions of dollars from the largest Swiss banks, arguing that such funds were the rightful property of European Jews who had died in the Holocaust. When the banks initially resisted, arguing that no solid evidence was being presented for such enormous claims, they were harshly denounced by America’s Jewish-dominated media, and Jewish lobbying led the American government to threaten them with severe financial sanctions that could have destroyed their businesses. Faced with such serious extortionate pressure, the banks finally gave way and paid out the bulk of the funds being demanded, with those billions mostly retained by the Jewish organizations leading the campaign and spent on their own projects since the purported Jewish heirs were impossible to locate.

This situation led historian Finkelstein to publish a short book in 2000 entitled The Holocaust Industry, in which he harshly critiqued what he characterized as a global Jewish money-making enterprise aimed at unfairly extracting wealth on behalf of the supposed Holocaust victims, often with little regard for truth or fairness. Although almost entirely ignored by the American media, it became a major bestseller in Europe, which eventually forced American publications to give it some attention. Among other things, Finkelstein noted that more than a half-century after the end of the Holocaust, the number of officially designated Holocaust survivors had grown so large that simple mortality considerations seemed to imply that huge numbers of European Jews must have survived the war. This obviously raised serious questions about how many might have actually died during that conflict and its accompanying Holocaust.

Over the years, I had noticed the same sorts of media reports claiming enormous totals of Holocaust survivors still alive now six or seven decades after the event. For example, even as late as 2009 an official at Israel’s Jewish Agency justified laws criminalizing Holocaust Denial by explaining that almost 65 years after the end of the war “there are still hundreds of thousands of living Holocaust survivors,” a statement which itself seems to constitute rather explicit Holocaust Denial. Indeed, a very noticeable number of all the New York Times obituaries I read these days in my morning newspapers seem to include Holocaust survivors still expiring in their eighties and nineties.

Anyone who reads serious history books knows that Jews have generally enjoyed a reputation for producing many of the world’s greatest swindlers and frauds, hardly surprising given their notorious tendency to lie and dissemble. Meanwhile, the Jewish community also seems to contain far more than its fair share of the emotionally disturbed and the mentally ill, and perhaps as a consequence has served as a launching-pad for many of the world’s religious cults and fanatic ideological movements. Any exploration of the Holocaust certainly tends to support this rather negative appraisal.

The Holocaust and Hollywood

Although the Holocaust began to enter American consciousness during the 1960s and 1970s with the publication of major books by Hilberg, Levin, Dawidowicz, and others, together with the resulting articles and reviews that these generated, the initial social impact was probably not substantial, at least outside the Jewish community. Even highly successful books selling in the many tens of thousands of copies would have little impact in a population of more than 200 million.

Our media completely shapes our perceived reality of the world, and although intellectuals and many of the highly educated are greatly influenced by books and other forms of printed content, the vast majority of the population understands the world through electronic media, especially that of popular entertainment.

Consider, for example, the 1974 publication of Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery, a magisterial two volume analysis by economists Robert William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman. By applying quantitative methods, the study overturned generations of assumptions about the American social institution, demonstrating that black slaves in the South were encouraged to marry and maintain their households, while having diets and medical care comparable to that of the free white population and often superior to that of Northern industrial wage-earners. Moreover, following emancipation the life expectancy of freedmen declined by ten percent and their illnesses increased by twenty per cent. All of this is summarized in the extensive Wikipedia entry.

Although their results were controversial, the authors had the strongest possible academic credentials, with Fogel, an eminent scholar, being a leading figure in a school of economics who went on to win a Nobel Prize. And Fogel’s ideological credentials were even more robust, given that he had had a lifelong commitment to black Civil Rights starting with the eight years he had spent as a young Communist Party organizer, while his 1949 marriage to a black woman had often subjected the couple to the indignities of the anti-miscegenation laws of that era. Consequently, their findings received unprecedented coverage in the mainstream media for an academic study and surely influenced numerous historians and journalists. Yet I think the long-term impact upon popular perceptions about slavery has been almost nil.

By contrast, in 1976 the ABC television network ran the prime-time miniseries Roots, a multi-generational account of a slave family. The story closely adhered to the traditionally harsh slavery narrative, while supposedly being based upon the recorded family history of Alex Haley, the author of the best-selling book of that same title. But although his work was later found to be fraudulent and apparently plagiarized, the ratings were stellar and the social impact enormous due to the audience of 100 million Americans who watched those episodes. Thus, even the most impressive written scholarship had absolutely no chance of competing with fictionalized television drama.

All three of America’s television networks were under Jewish ownership or control, so it was hardly surprising that two years later ABC decided to repeat this process with the 1978 television miniseries Holocaust, which also achieved an audience of 100 million and generated enormous profits. It seems quite possible this may have been the first time many American families discovered that colossal but almost entirely invisible event of World War II.

The following year, William Styron published Sophie’s Choice, a heart-rending tale involving deeply buried memories of the extermination of Christian Polish children in the Auschwitz gas chambers. Although such an occurrence was absolutely contrary to the doctrines of all Jewish Holocaust scholars, the novel became a huge national best-seller anyway, and a 1982 film of the same name soon followed, with Meryl Streep winning an Oscar for Best Actress. A decade later, Steven Spielberg’s 1993 Schindler’s List won a remarkable seven Oscars, while grossing nearly $100 million.

With Hollywood so overwhelmingly Jewish, the consequences were hardly surprising, and a huge cinematic genre soon developed. According to Finkelstein, Hollywood produced some 180 Holocaust films just during the years 1989-2004. Even the very partial subset of Holocaust films listed on Wikipedia has grown enormously long, but fortunately the Movie Database has winnowed down the catalog by providing a list of the 50 Most Moving Holocaust Films.

Many billions of dollars have surely been invested over the years on the total production costs of this ongoing business enterprise. For most ordinary people, “seeing is believing,” and how could anyone seriously doubt the reality of the Holocaust after having seen all the gas chambers and mounds of murdered Jewish corpses constructed by highly-paid Hollywood set designers? Doubting the existence of Spiderman and the Incredible Hulk would be almost as absurd.

Some 2% of Americans have a Jewish background, while perhaps 95% possess Christian roots, but the Wikipedia list of Christian films seems rather scanty and rudimentary by comparison. Very few of those films were ever widely released, and the selection is stretched to even include The Chronicles of Narnia, which contains no mention of Christianity whatsoever. One of the very few prominent exceptions on the list is Mel Gibson’s 2004 The Passion of the Christ, which he was forced to personally self-fund. And despite the enormous financial success of that movie, one of the most highly profitable domestic releases of all time, the project rendered Gibson a hugely vilified pariah in the industry over which he had once reigned as its biggest star, especially after word got around that his own father was a Holocaust Denier.

 

In many respects, Hollywood and the broader entertainment media today provide the unifying spiritual basis of our deeply secular society, and the overwhelming predominance of Holocaust-themed films over Christian ones has obvious implications. Meanwhile, in our globalized world, the American entertainment-media complex totally dominates Europe and the rest of the West, so that the ideas generated here effectively shape the minds of many hundreds of millions of people living elsewhere, whether or not they fully recognize that fact.

In 2009, Pope Benedict XVI sought to heal the long-standing Vatican II rift within the Catholic Church and reconcile with the breakaway Society of St. Pius X faction. But this became a major media controversy when it was discovered that Bishop Richard Williamson, one of the leading members of that latter organization, had long been a Holocaust Denier and also believed that Jews should convert to Christianity. Although the many other differences in Catholic doctrinal faith were fully negotiable, apparently refusing to accept the reality of the Holocaust was not, and Williamson remained estranged from the Catholic Church. Soon afterward he was even prosecuted for heresy by the German government.

Internet critics have suggested that over the last couple of generations, energetic Jewish activists have successfully lobbied Western nations into replacing their traditional religion of Christianity with the new religion of Holocaustianity, and the Williamson Affair certainly seems to support that conclusion.

Consider the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. Funded by Jewish interests, it spent years launching vicious attacks against Christianity, sometimes in crudely pornographic fashion, and also periodically vilified Islam. Such activities were hailed by French politicians as proof of the total freedom of thought allowed in the land of Voltaire. But the moment that one of its leading cartoonists made a very mild joke related to Jews, he was immediately fired, and if the publication had ever ridiculed the Holocaust, it surely would have been immediately shut down, and its entire staff possibly thrown into prison.

Western journalists and human rights advocates have often expressed support for the boldly transgressive activities of the Jewish-funded Femen activists when they desecrate Christian churches all around the world. But such pundits would certainly be in an uproar if anyone were to act in similar fashion toward the growing international network of Holocaust Museums, most of them built at public expense.

Indeed, one of the underlying sources of bitter Western conflict with Vladimir Putin’s Russia seems to be that he has restored Christianity to a favored place in a society where the early Bolsheviks had once dynamited churches and massacred many thousands of priests. Western intellectual elites held far more positive feelings toward the USSR while its leaders retained a stridently anti-Christian attitude.

The Rise and Suppression of Holocaust Denial

Since the Holocaust had been almost unknown in America until the mid-1960s, explicit Holocaust Denial was equally non-existent, but as the former grew in visibility following the publication of Hilberg’s 1961 book, the latter soon began to awaken as well.

Lipstadt’s vilification of Barnes as the “godfather” of Holocaust Denial does contain a nugget of truth. His posthumously-published 1968 review endorsing Rassinier’s denialist analysis seems to be the first such substantial statement published anywhere in America, at least if we exclude Beaty’s very casual 1951 dismissal of the Jewish claims, which seem to have attracted negligible public attention.

Near the end of the 1960s, a right-wing publisher named Willis Carto came across a short and unpolished Holocaust Denial manuscript, apparently produced some years earlier, and he ignored legal niceties by simply putting it into print. The purported author then sued for plagiarism, and although the case was eventually settled, his identity eventually leaked out as being that of David L. Hoggan, a Barnes protege with a Harvard Ph.D. in history serving as a junior faculty member at Stanford. His desire for anonymity was aimed at preventing the destruction of his career, but he failed in that effort, and further academic appointments quickly dried up.

Meanwhile, Murray Rothbard, the founding father of modern libertarianism, had always been a strong supporter of historical Revisionism, and greatly admired Barnes, who for decades had been the leading figure in that field. Barnes had also briefly hinted at his general skepticism about the Holocaust in a lengthy 1967 article appearing in the Rampart Journal, a short-lived libertarian publication, and this may have been noticed within those ideological circles. It appears that by the early 1970s, Holocaust Denial had become a topic of some discussion within America’s heavily Jewish but fiercely free-thinking libertarian community, and this was to have an important consequence.

A professor of Electrical Engineering at Northwestern named Arthur R. Butz was casually visiting some libertarian gathering during this period when he happened to notice a pamphlet denouncing the Holocaust as a fraud. He had never previously given any thought to the issue, but such a shocking claim captured his attention, and he began looking into the matter early in 1972. He soon decided that the accusation was probably correct, but found the supporting evidence, including that presented in the unfinished and anonymous Hoggan book, far too sketchy, and decided it needed to be fleshed out in much more detailed and comprehensive fashion. He proceeded to undertake this project over the next few years, working with the methodical diligence of a trained academic engineer.

His major work, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, first appeared in print late in 1976, and immediately became the central text of the Holocaust Denial community, a position it still seems to retain down to this present day, while with all the updates and appendices, the length has grown to well over 200,000 words. Although no mention of this forthcoming book appeared in the February 1976 issue of Reason, it is possible that word of the pending publication had gotten around within libertarian circles, prompting the sudden new focus upon historical Revisionism.

Butz was a respectable tenured professor at Northwestern, and the release of his book laying out the Holocaust Denial case soon became a minor sensation, covered by the New York Times and other media outlets in January 1977. In one of her books, Lipstadt devotes a full chapter entitled “Entering the Mainstream” to Butz’s work. According to a December 1980 Commentary article by Dawidowicz, Jewish donors and Jewish activists quickly mobilized, attempting to have Butz fired for his heretical views, but back then academic tenure still held firm and Butz survived, an outcome that seems to have greatly irritated Dawidowicz.

Such a detailed and comprehensive book laying out the Holocaust Denial case naturally had a considerable impact on the national debate, especially since the author was a mainstream and apparently apolitical academic, and an American edition of Butz’s book soon appeared in 1977. I’m very pleased to have made arrangements to include the volume in my collection of Controversial HTML Books, so those interested can easily read it and decide for themselves.

 

The following year, these Holocaust Denial trends seemed to gain further momentum as Carto opened a small new publishing enterprise in California called the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), which launched a quarterly periodical entitled The Journal of Historical Review in 1980. Both the IHR and its JHR publication centered their efforts around Revisionism in general, but with Holocaust Denial being their major focus. Lipstadt devotes an entire chapter to the IHR, later noting that most of the main authors of the February 1976 Reason issue soon became affiliated with that project or with other Carto enterprises, as did Butz, while the editorial board of the JHR was soon well-stocked with numerous Ph.D.’s, often earned at highly-reputable universities. For the next quarter century or so, the IHR would hold small conferences every year or two, with David Irving eventually becoming a regular presenter, and even fully mainstream figures such as Pulitzer Prize-winning historian John Toland occasionally appearing as speakers.

As an important example of IHR efforts, in 1983 the organization published The Dissolution of Eastern Europe Jewry, a very detailed quantitative analysis of the underlying demographics and population movements around the period encompassed by World War II, apparently the first such study undertaken. The author, writing under the pen-name Walter N. Sanning, sought to revise the extremely simplistic population analysis casually assumed by Holocaust historians.

Before the war, millions of Jews had lived in Eastern Europe, and after the war, those communities had mostly vanished. This undeniable fact has long stood as an implicit central pillar of the traditional Holocaust narrative. But drawing upon entirely mainstream sources, Sanning persuasively demonstrates that the situation was actually far more complicated than it might seem. For example, it was widely reported at the time that vast numbers of Polish Jews had been transported by the Soviets to locations deep within their territory, on both voluntary and involuntary terms, with future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin being including in those transfers. In addition, huge numbers of heavily urbanized Soviet Jews were similarly evacuated ahead of the advancing German forces in 1941. The exact size of these population movements has long been uncertain and disputed, but Sanning’s careful analysis of postwar Soviet census data and other sources suggests that the totals were likely towards the upper end of most estimates. Sanning makes no claim that his findings are definitive, but even if they are only partially correct, such results would certainly preclude the reality of traditional Holocaust numbers.

Another regular IHR participant was Robert Faurisson. As a professor of literature at the University of Lyons-2, he began expressing his public skepticism about the Holocaust during the 1970s, and the resulting media uproar led to efforts to remove him from his position, while a petition was signed on his behalf by 200 international scholars, including famed MIT professor Noam Chomsky. Faurisson stuck to his opinions, but attacks persisted, including a brutal beating by Jewish militants that hospitalized him, while a French political candidate espousing similar views was assassinated. Jewish activist organizations began lobbying for laws to broadly outlaw the activities of Faurisson and others, and in 1990, soon after the Berlin Wall fell and research at Auschwitz and other Holocaust sites suddenly became far easier, France passed a statute criminalizing Holocaust Denial, apparently the first nation after defeated Germany to do so. During the years that followed, large numbers of other Western countries did the same, setting the disturbing precedent of resolving scholarly disputes via prison sentences, a softer form of the same policy followed in Stalinist Russia.

Since Faurisson was a literary scholar, it is not entirely surprising that one of his major interests was The Diary of Anne Frank, generally regarded as the Holocaust’s iconic literary classic, telling the story of a young Jewish girl who died after being deported from Holland to Auschwitz. He argued that the text was substantially fraudulent, written by someone else after the end of the war, and for decades various determined individuals have argued the case back and forth. I cannot properly evaluate any of their complex arguments, which apparently involve questions of ballpoint pen technology and textual emendations, nor have I ever read the book itself.

But for me, the most striking aspect of the story is the girl’s actual fate under the official narrative, as recounted in the thoroughly establishmentarian Wikipedia entry. Apparently disease was raging in her camp despite the best efforts of the Germans to control it, and she soon became quite ill, mostly remaining bedridden in the infirmary, before eventually dying from typhus in Spring 1945 at a different camp about six months after her initial arrival. It seems rather odd to me that a young Jewish girl who fell severely ill at Auschwitz would have spent so much time in camp hospitals and eventually die there, given that we are told the primary purpose of Auschwitz and other such camps was the efficient extermination of its Jewish inmates.

 

By the mid-1990s the Holocaust Denial movement seemed to be gaining in public visibility, presumably aided by the doubts raised after the official 1992 announcement that the estimated deaths at Auschwitz had been reduced by around 3 million.

For example, the February 1995 issue of Marco Polo, a glossy Japanese magazine with a circulation of 250,000, carried a long article declaring that the gas chambers of the Holocaust were a propaganda hoax. Israel and Jewish-activist groups quickly responded, organizing a widespread advertising boycott of all the publications of the parent company, one of Japan’s most respected publishers, which quickly folded in the face of that serious threat. All copies of the issue were recalled from the newspapers, the staffers were dismissed, and the entire magazine was soon shut down, while the president of the parent company was forced to resign.

In exploring the history of Holocaust Denial, I have noticed this same sort of recurrent pattern, most typically involving individuals rather than institutions. Someone highly-regarded and fully mainstream decides to investigate the controversial topic, and soon comes to conclusions that sharply deviate from the official truth of the last two generations. For various reasons, those views become public, and he is immediately demonized by the Jewish-dominated media as a horrible extremist, perhaps mentally-deranged, while being relentlessly hounded by a ravenous pack of fanatic Jewish-activists. This usually brings about the destruction of his career.

In the early 1960s Stanford historian David Hoggan produced his anonymous manuscript The Myth of the Six Million, but once it got into circulation and his identity became known, his academic career was destroyed. A dozen years later, something along the same lines happened with Northwestern Electrical Engineering professor Arthur Butz, and only his academic tenure saved him from a similar fate.

Fred Leuchter was widely regarded as one of America’s leading expert specialists on the technology of executions, and a long article in The Atlantic treated him as such. During the 1980s, Ernst Zundel, a prominent Canadian Holocaust Denier, was facing trial for his disbelief in the Auschwitz gas chambers, and one of his expert witnesses was an American prison warden with some experience in such systems, who recommended involving Leuchter, one of the foremost figures in the field. Leuchter soon took a trip to Poland and closely inspected the purported Auschwitz gas chambers, then published the Leuchter Report, concluding that they were obviously a fraud and could not possibly have worked in the manner Holocaust scholars had always claimed. The ferocious attacks which followed soon cost him his entire business career and destroyed his marriage.

David Irving had ranked as the world’s most successful World War II historian, with his books selling in the millions amid glowing coverage in the top British newspapers when he agreed to appear as an expert witness at the Zundel trial. He had always previously accepted the conventional Holocaust narrative, but reading the Leuchter Report changed his mind, and he concluded that the Auschwitz gas chambers were just a myth. He was quickly subjected to unrelenting media attacks, which first severely damaged and then ultimately destroyed his very illustrious publishing career, and he later even served time in an Austrian prison for his unacceptable views.

Dr. Germar Rudolf was a successful young German chemist working at the prestigious Max Planck Institute when he heard of the controversy regarding the Leuchter Report, which he found reasonably persuasive but containing some weaknesses. Therefore, he repeated the analysis on a more thorough basis, and published the results as the Chemistry of Auschwitz, which came to the same conclusions as Leuchter. And just like Leuchter before him, Rudolf suffered the destruction of his career and his marriage, and since Germany treats these matters in harsher fashion, he eventually served five years in prison for his scientific impudence.

Most recently, Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, who had spent eleven years as a historian of science on the staff of University College, London, suffered this same fate in 2008. His scientific interests in the Holocaust provoked a media firestorm of vilification, and he was fired with a single day’s notice, becoming the first member of his research institution ever expelled for ideological reasons. He had previously provided the Isaac Newton entry for a massive biographical encyclopedia of astronomers, and America’s most prestigious science journal demanded that the entire work be pulped, destroying the work of over 100 writers, because it had been fatally tainted by having such a villainous contributor. He recounted this unfortunate personal history as an introduction to his 2014 book Breaking the Spell, which I highly recommend.

Kollerstrom’s text effectively summarizes much of the more recent Holocaust Denial evidence, including the official Auschwitz death books returned by Gorbachev after the end of the Cold War, which indicate that Jewish fatalities were some 99% lower than the widely-believed total. Furthermore, Jewish deaths actually showed a sharp decline once plentiful supplies of Zyklon B arrived, exactly contrary to what might have been expected under the conventional account. He also discusses the interesting new evidence contained in the British wartime decrypts of all German communications between the various concentration camps and the Berlin headquarters. Much of this material is presented in an interesting two hour interview on Red Ice Radio, conveniently available on YouTube:

The lives and careers of a very sizable number of other individuals have followed this same unfortunate sequence, which in much of Europe often ends in criminal prosecution and imprisonment. Most notably, a German lawyer who became a bit too bold in her legal arguments soon joined her client behind bars, and as a consequence, it has become increasingly difficult for accused Holocaust Deniers to secure effective legal representation. By Kollerstrom’s estimates, many thousands of individuals are currently serving time across Europe for Holocaust Denial.

EuropeanDenial

My impression is that by the late 1960s, the old Soviet Bloc countries had mostly stopped imprisoning people merely for questioning Marxist-Leninist dogma, and reserved their political prisons only for those actively organizing against the regime, while Holocaust Denial is treated today in far harsher fashion. One clear difference is that actual belief in Communist doctrine had entirely faded away to almost nothing even among the Communist leadership itself, while these days Holocaustianity is still a young and deeply held faith, at least within a small slice of the population that exerts enormously disproportionate leverage over our public institutions.

Another obvious factor is the many billions of dollars currently at stake in what Finkelstein has aptly characterized as “the Holocaust Industry.” For example, potentially enormous new claims are now being reopened against Poland for Jewish property that was lost or confiscated during the World War II era.

In America, the situation is somewhat different, and our First Amendment still protects Holocaust Deniers against imprisonment, though the efforts of the ADL and various other groups to criminalize “hate speech” are clearly aimed at eventually removing that obstacle. But in the meantime, crippling social and economic sanctions are often used to pursue the same objectives.

Furthermore, various Internet monopolies have been gradually persuaded or co-opted into preventing the easy distribution of dissenting information. There have been stories in the media over the last few years that Google has been censoring or redirecting its Holocaust search results away from those disputing the official narrative. Even more ominously, Amazon, our current near-monopolistic retailer of books, last year took the unprecedented step of banning thousands of Holocaust Denial works, presumably lest they “confuse” curious readers, so it is fortunate that I had purchased mine a couple of years earlier. These parallels with George Orwell’s 1984 are really quite striking, and the “Iron Curtain Over America” that Beaty had warned about in his 1951 book of that title seems much closer to becoming a full reality.

Various figures in the Holocaust Denial community have attempted to mitigate this informational blacklist, and Dr. Rudolf some time ago established a website HolocaustHandbooks.com, which allows a large number of the key volumes to be purchased or easily read on-line in a variety of different formats. But the growing censorship by Amazon, Google, and other Internet monopolies greatly reduces the likelihood that anyone will readily encounter the information.

 

Obviously, most supporters of the conventional Holocaust narrative would prefer to win their battles on the level playing fields of analysis rather than by utilizing economic or administrative means to incapacitate their opponents. But I have seen little evidence that they have enjoyed any serious success in this regard.

Aside from the various books by Lipstadt, which I found to be of poor quality and quite unpersuasive, one of the most energetic Holocaust supporters of the last couple of decades seems to have been Michael Shermer, the editor of Skeptic magazine, who had earned his degrees in psychology and the history of science.

ORDER IT NOW

In 1997, he published Why People Believe Weird Things, seeking to debunk all sorts of irrational beliefs popular in certain circles, with the book’s subtitle describing these as “pseudo-science” and “superstition.” His cover text focused on ESP, alien abductions, and witchcraft, but rebutting Holocaust Denial was the single largest portion of that book, encompassing three full chapters. His discussion of this latter subject was rather superficial, and he probably undercut his credibility by grouping it together with his debunking of the scientific reality of “race” as a similar right-wing fallacy, one also long since disproved by mainstream scientists. Regarding the latter issue, he went on to argue that the alleged black-white differences claimed in works such as The Bell Curve by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray was entirely pseudo-scientific nonsense, and he emphasized that book and similar ones had been promoted by the same pro-Nazi groups who advocated Holocaust Denial, with those two pernicious doctrines being closely linked together. Shermer had recruited Harvard professor Stephen Jay Gould to write the Foreword for his book and that raises serious questions about his knowledge or his judgment since Gould is widely regarded as one of the most notorious scientific frauds of the late twentieth century.

ORDER IT NOW

In 2000, Shermer returned to the battle, publishing Denying History, entirely focused on refuting Holocaust Denial. This time he recruited Holocaust scholar Alex Grobman as his co-author and acknowledged the generous financial support he had received from various Jewish organizations. A large portion of the text seemed to focus on the psychology and sociology of Holocaust Deniers, trying to explain why people could believe in such patently absurd nonsense. Indeed, so much space was devoted to those issues that he was forced to entirely skip over the official reduction of the Auschwitz body-count by 3 million just a few years earlier, thus avoiding any need to explain why this large shift had had no impact on the canonical Holocaust figure of Six Million.

 

Although various writers such as Shermer may have been encouraged by generous financial subsidies to make fools of themselves, their more violent allies on the extreme fringe have probably had a greater impact on the Holocaust debate. Although judicial and economic sanctions may deter the vast majority of Holocaust Deniers from showing their face, extra-legal violence has also often been deployed against those hardy souls who remain undeterred.

For example, during the 1980s the offices and warehouse storage facilities of the IHR in Southern California were fire-bombed and totally destroyed by Jewish militants. And although Canada has traditionally had little political violence, in 1995 the large, ramshackle house that served as the residence and business office of Canada’s Ernst Zundel, one of the world’s leading publishers and distributers of Holocaust Denial literature, was similarly fire-bombed and burned to the ground. Zundel had already faced several criminal prosecutions on charges of spreading “false news,” and eventually served years in prison, before being deported back to his native Germany, where he served additional imprisonment. Various other prominent Holocaust Deniers have even faced threats of assassination.

Most historians and other academic scholars are quiet souls, and surely the looming threat of such serious terroristic violence must have dissuaded many of them from involving themselves in such obviously controversial issues. Meanwhile, relentless financial and social pressure may gradually wear down both individuals and organizations, causing them to eventually either abandon the field or become far less active, with their places sometimes taken by newcomers.

The year after the 9/11 attacks, the JHR ceased print publication. The growth of the Internet was probably an important contributing factor, and with the national focus shifting so sharply toward foreign policy and the Middle East, its IHR parent organization became much less active, while much of the ongoing debate in Revisionism and Holocaust Denial shifted to various other online venues. But at some point over the years, the JHR digitized many hundreds of its articles and posted them on its website, providing over three million words of generally very high-quality historical content.

Over the last couple of months, I have been repeatedly surprised to discover that the historians associated with the IHR had long ago published articles on topics quite parallel to some of my own. For example, after I published an article on the Suvorov Hypothesis that Germany’s Barbarossa attack had preempted Stalin’s planned attack and conquest of Europe, someone informed me that a reviewer had extensively discussed the same Suvorov book twenty years earlier in an issue of JHR. I also discovered several pieces by CIA defector Victor Marchetti, a important figure for JFK assassination researchers, who had received little attention in the mainstream media. There were also articles on the fate of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, a topic almost entirely excluded from the mainstream media.

Casually browsing some of the archives, I was quite impressed with their quality, and since the archives were freely available for anyone to republish, I went ahead and incorporated them, making the millions of words of their Revisionist and Holocaust Denial content much more conveniently available to interested readers. The material is fully searchable, and also organized by Author, Topic, and Time Period, with a few sample links included below:

The Journal of Historical Review, 1980-2002 Issues

Author Archives:

Topic Archives:

So for those particularly interested in Holocaust Denial, well over a million words of such discussion may now be conveniently available, including works by many of the authors once so highly regarded by the early editors of Reason magazine.

Secretive Holocaust Denial

The steadily growing economic and political power of organized Jewish groups, backed by Hollywood image-making, eventually won the visible war and crushed the Holocaust Denial movement in the public arena, enforcing a particular historical narrative by criminal prosecutions across most of Europe and severe social and economic sanctions in America. But a stubborn underground resistance still exists, with its size being difficult to estimate.

Although my interest in the Holocaust had always been rather minimal, once the Internet came into being and my circle of friends and acquaintances greatly expanded, the topic would very occasionally come up. Over the years, a considerable number of seemingly rational people at one time or another privately let slip their extreme skepticism about various elements of the canonical Holocaust narrative, and such doubts seemed to represent merely the tip of the iceberg.

Every now and then someone in that category spoke a little too freely or became a target for retaliation on a different matter, and our media went into a feeding frenzy of Holocaust Denial accusations and counter-accusations.

For example, during the impeachment battles of the late 1990s, Clinton partisans believed that prominent liberal pundit Christopher Hitchens had betrayed the personal confidences of presidential aide Sidney Blumenthal, and journalist Edward Jay Epstein decided to retaliate in kind, widely circulating a memo to the media accusing Hitchens of secretly being a Holocaust Denier. He alleged that at a 1995 dinner gathering following a New Yorker anniversary celebration, Hitchens had drunk a little too much wine and began expounding to his table-mates that the Holocaust was simply a hoax. Epstein backed his claim by saying he had been so shocked at such statements that he had entered them into his personal diary. That telling detail and the fact that most of the other witnesses seemed suspiciously vague in their recollections persuaded me that Epstein was probably being truthful. A bitter feud between Hitchens and Epstein soon erupted.

In 2005 Hitchens denounced various opponents of Bush’s Iraq War as anti-Semites, and in retaliation Alexander Cockburn published a couple of Counterpunch columns resurrecting that 1999 controversy, which is when I first discovered it. As a regular reader of Counterpunch, I was intrigued and Googling around a bit, quickly located media accounts of Epstein’s explicit accusations. Numerous reports of the the incident still survive on the web, including one from the NY Daily News as well as a portion of an MSNBC piece, and although some of the more extensive ones have disappeared over the last dozen years, the media text I remember reading in 2005 has been preserved on the static HTML pages of several websites:

Epstein told MSNBC that Hitchens had misspoken himself on the Holocaust on Feb. 12, 1995 – in fact, practically four years ago – as the two of them, along with some other friends, were dining in New York.

Epstein was so shocked, he says, and considered Hitchens doubts so grave, that he went home and noted them in his diary!

According to the Epstein diary: “Once seated in a booth, and freely sipping his free red wine, Hitchens advanced a theory more revealing than anything going on at the Hudson theater. His thesis, to the shock of everyone at the table, was that the Holocaust was a fiction developed by a conspiracy of interests bent on ‘criminalizing the German Nation’”

“He explained that no evidence of German mass murder had ever been found – and what gruesome artifacts had been found had been fabricated after the event,” Epstein confided to his diary.

“What of the testimony of Nazi generals at Nuremberg about the death camps,” he asked.

Hitchens, according to the Epstein diary notation, explained “. . . without missing a beat, that such admissions were obtained under Anglo-American torture.” Epstein then asked, as noted in his diary: “‘But what happened to the Jews in Europe?’ Hitch shrugged and said, ‘Many were killed by local villagers when they ran away, others died natural deaths, and the remainder made it to Israel.”

 

After reading these interesting columns, I began noticing that Cockburn himself sometimes provided hints suggesting that his own personal opinion on the Holocaust might be somewhat heretical, including his cryptical remarks that huge hoaxes were actually much easier to create and maintain than most people realized.

Just a few months after his attack on Hitchens, Cockburn published a two-part article strongly arguing that Nobel Peace Prize Winner Elie Wiesel, the most famous of all Holocaust survivors, was simply a fraud. I had always been taught that Zyklon B was the deadly agent used by the Nazis to exterminate the Jews of Auschwitz and I had vaguely become aware that Holocaust Deniers absurdly claimed the compound had instead been employed as a delousing agent in the camps, aimed at preventing the spread of Typhus; but then the following year, I was shocked to discover in one of Cockburn’s columns that for decades the U.S. government had itself used Zyklon B as the primary delousing agent for immigrants entering at its Mexican border. I recall several other columns from the mid-2000s dancing around Holocaust issues, but I now seem unable to locate them within the Counterpunch archives.

My growing realization 15-odd years ago that substantial numbers of knowledgeable people appeared to be secret adherents of Holocaust Denial certainly reshaped my own unquestioning assumptions on that subject. The occasional newspaper account of a Holocaust Denier being discovered and then flayed and destroyed by the media easily explained why the public positions on that subject remained so unanimous. Being busy with other things, I don’t think I ever had a conversation with anyone on that controversial subject or even so much as an email exchange, but I did keep my eyes and ears open, and huge doubts had certainly entered my mind many years before I ever bothered reading my first book on the subject.

Meanwhile, the concurrent collapse of my belief in our official American Pravda narrative on so many other controversial topics played a major role as well. Once I realized to my dismay that I couldn’t believe a word of what our media and political leaders said about major events in the here and now, their credibility on controversial happenings so long ago and far away entirely disappeared. For these reasons, I had grown quite suspicious and held a very open mind on Holocaust matters as I eventually began reading books on both sides of the issue in the wake of the Reason controversy.

The Future of Holocaust Denial

For many years following the end of World War II very little seems to have been written about the momentous topic now known as the Holocaust. But from the 1960s onward, interest surged so enormously that many thousands or even tens of thousands of volumes on that once-ignored event have been produced. Therefore, the fifteen or twenty books that I have personally read is merely a sliver of that total.

I have invested only a few weeks of reading and research in studying this large and complex subject, and my knowledge is obviously dwarfed by that of the considerable number of individuals who have devoted many years or decades of their lives to such activity. For these reasons, the analysis I have presented above must surely contain numerous gaping errors that others could easily correct. But sometimes a newcomer may notice things that deeply-involved professionals might normally miss, and may also better understand the perspectives of those who have likewise never paid much attention to the subject.

Any conclusions I have drawn are obviously preliminary ones, and the weight others should attach to these must absolutely reflect my strictly amateur status. However, as an outsider exploring this contentious topic I think it far more likely than not that the standard Holocaust narrative is at least substantially false, and quite possibly, almost entirely so.

Despite this situation, the powerful media focus in support of the Holocaust over the last few decades has elevated it to a central position in Western culture. I wouldn’t be surprised if it currently occupies a larger place in the minds of most ordinary folk than does the Second World War that encompassed it, and therefore possesses greater apparent reality.

However, some forms of shared beliefs may be a mile wide but an inch deep, and the casual assumptions of individuals who have never actually investigated a given subject may rapidly change. Also, the popular strength of doctrines that have long been maintained in place by severe social and economic sanctions, often coupled by criminal ones, may possibly be much weaker than anyone realizes.

Until thirty years ago, Communist rule over the USSR and its Warsaw Pact allies seemed absolutely permanent and unshakeable, but the roots of that belief had totally rotted away, leaving behind nothing more than a hollow facade. Then one day, a gust of wind came along, and the entire gigantic structure collapsed. I wouldn’t be surprised if our current Holocaust narrative eventually suffers that same fate, perhaps with unfortunate consequences for those too closely associated with having maintained it.

Related Readings:

 
The American Pravda Series
Hide 2327 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous[679] • Disclaimer says:

    I had lamented the absence of an American Pravda column on the past couple Mondays, as it has become a treasured little pleasure of mine to read through a new one on my Monday commute. Yet seeing that a new one of considerable length and dealing with a very important issue has been published certainly lightens my day, even before I’ve read it. Keep up the great work, Mr. Unz!

  2. ‘…Lipstadt convincingly demonstrates that very few Americans seem to have believed in the reality of the Holocaust during the Second World War itself, despite considerable efforts by agitated Jewish activists to persuade them…’

    A bit of what is now ancient history becomes relevant here. Forty-fifty years before the Second World War, Jews had started retailing what turned out to be grossly exaggerated accounts of their sufferings in Russian pogroms. Anything from one or two to perhaps a score of deaths became hundreds, and innuimerable utterly fictitious atrocity tales were reported as fact.

    Eventually, of course, the exaggeration became obvious. However, it was repeated at the time of the Russian Civil War. Once again, vast death tolls from pogroms, etc. Yet again, that the tales were a mixture of exaggeration and outright fabrication eventually became obvious.

    Hence, when reports of massive Nazi death camps started coming out of Eastern Europe a generation later, they were understandably greeted with skepticism — the more so as the First World War had also seen vast quantities of spurious German atrocity stories. For example, there was some ridiculous tale about the Germans killing Belgians and turning their bodies into soap or something — in camps, no less.

    People were skeptical about the camps for good reason. These sort of lies had been being produced — and subsequently shown to be lies — for a good sixty years preceding the Second World War. No doubt the Germans were being beastly to the Jews — but actually killing them by the million? That elicited a collective raised eyebrow.

  3. Rational says:

    HOLOCAUST IS A FANTASY…..

    Thanks for the excellent article, Sir. You make many great points. Psychologically……

    Holocaust means to burn the whole animal alive. It is barbecuing a whole animal live.

    Holo = whole.

    Caust = burn.

    So who loves Holocaust?

    Yahweh.

    He demand quarbanot, i.e. sacrifice, as the ultimate act of love and devotion to him, like Avram tried to kill his own son as a sacrifice to Yahweh.

    The whole of Torah is about quarbanot, and Yahweh loves the smell of burning flesh—quarbanot. This phrase appears over and over in the Torah.

    That was the whole purpose of the Jewish temple—quarbanot. That is what the temple priests demanded—quarbanot. That is the biggest mitzvah–quarbanot.

    The holiest quarbanot is of the whole live animal, i.e. holocaust.

    The deepest Jewish fantasy is to become holy, to become one with Yahweh, to become his quarbanot, his holocaust and to become holy, as his chosen one.

    • Replies: @corstopitum
    , @caveman
  4. Wally says:

    The fraud is coming to an end.

    There is simply no proof to sustain the holocaust’ narrative, none.

    The claims defy laws of science, logic & rational thinking. IOW, it is a hateful & destructive religion that has been very profitable for Jews in general and “that shitty little country” in particular.

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. Only lies require laws against free speech & persecution of those who speak freely.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  5. Rational says:

    ADDENDUM ON KORBAN:

    Per Wikipedia article on Korban and its subtype, called Olah:

    The Hebrew noun olah (עֹלָה) occurs 289 times in the Masoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible…………..It means “that which goes up [in smoke]“.[3]. Olah’s traditional name in English is “holocaust”,[3] and the word olah has traditionally been translated as “burnt offering.”[4][5][6] The term was translated as holocauston in the Septuagint. Today, some English Bible translations render the word as holocaust, and others translate it as “burnt offering”.

    Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnt_offering_%28Judaism%29

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Eckbach
  6. phil says:

    Auschwitz has lost some of its luster, but the Holocaust establishment still stands by many of the longstanding narratives. Meanwhile, much attention has been shifted to Treblinka. Excavations at two of the other Reinhardt camps did not find much to substantiate claims of hundred of thousands of victims, and the early use of ground-based radar at Treblinka has not yielded very much either, BBC pronouncements notwithstanding.

    On the other hand, although Carlo Mattogno has produced several fascinating documents which point to many of the Jewish campers having been transited to destinations in Byelorussia, Ukraine, and the Baltics, there are more than 1.2 million people to be accounted for, and it is understandable that many onlookers are not persuaded by the Holocaust Revisionists. It would be helpful if Putin would do more to make Soviet-era archives available, but he is upholding the standard Holocaust narratives thus far.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @CalDre
  7. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:

    If only it were just ‘denial’ that were prohibited. In many places it’s verboten even to ask impertinent questions, and in some places all questions are deemed impertinent.

    “It is clear that thought is not free if the profession of certain opinions makes it impossible to earn a living. It is clear also that thought is not free if all the arguments on one side of a controversy are perpetually presented as attractively as possible, while the arguments on the other side can only be discovered by diligent search.”

    ― Bertrand Russell, Sceptical Essays

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Jett Rucker
  8. Here we go: Holocaust Denial.

    Don’t worry. Personally, I think the Holocaust occurred substantially as described, but if others want to argue differently, I don’t see it as heresy. I’m no more offended than if someone wants to argue the Japanese could have successfully invaded Hawaii. Not my opinion, but…

    I will point out that while he has flirted with outright Holocaust Denial in the past, David Irving has found and published on his website what he regards as irrefutable evidence that 2.5 million Jews were killed in the ‘Operation Reinhard’ camps alone. While he is skeptical about the importance of Auschwitz, I imagine he’d agree at least a million additional Jews were killed by the Einsatzgruppen in the East, died of starvation in the Warsaw Ghetto, etc, etc.

    So we’re at 3.5 million as a minimum figure — I’d go with at least 5 million myself. Obviously, the difference would have been very important to Jew #3,773,751 but as a moral matter, I don’t see the distinction. 3.5 million is substantially as awful as 5 million. Have 6 million if it’s important to you. No one will ever know with any great precision anyway. As far as I’m concerned, it’s like arguing about what proportion of Iran’s population the Mongols killed. Past a point, a definitive answer simply isn’t to be found, and it’s certainly not something that’s worth assaulting elderly men in the streets over.

    Actually, the only significant area of controversy I see is whether Hitler knew and approved. There’s no clear evidence. Irving argues he didn’t — I’d guess he did. That particular question could do with some dispassionate analysis.

    As to why not many paid attention to the Holocaust before 1961 — it’s bloody dull. Lining unresisting victims up and shooting them is objectively about as interesting and appealing a subject for study as the operations of a slaughterhouse. This actually is the worst effect of the whole Holocaust Industry phenomenon. Lately it seems that every text dealing with Germany in the Second World War feels obliged to spend half its pages recounting the tale of the Holocaust yet again, and it’s bloody dull.

    Finally, the unique horror escapes me. We are all individuals; what matters above all to us is that it is us being killed, not our precise relationship to our fellow victims. How it was somehow consolation to a Russian POW starving to death that he wasn’t being killed because he was Jewish, or solace to a four year old girl being baked alive in a cellar in Dresden that it wasn’t being done because she was Jewish totally escapes me.

    The Holocaust. It happened, it was wrong, and it’s dull.

  9. They say that in war truth is the first casualty. Unfortunately, multicultural societies like ours are always at war, n the MSM are the chief weapons.

  10. A few weeks back I opined that Ron was almost there and we could anytime expect “American Pravda the Holocaust and here we are

    Kaboom, the 50 megaton Tsar Bomba has exploded.

    However, as an outsider exploring this contentious topic I think it far more likely than not that the standard Holocaust narrative is at least substantially false, and quite possibly, almost entirely so.

    Welcome to the club Ron, I suspect that you were there a long time ago and have come out. It takes tremendous moral and physical courage to take this position and I salute you. As the Americans say to their military personnel – Thank you for your service.

    • Replies: @Jett Rucker
  11. Ron,

    Carlo Mattogno is probably the most distinguished of the Holocaust revisionist historians, he’s written tens of thousands of densely referenced pages spanning decades of work. He’s definitely worth archiving. It’s telling that the orthodox historians have completely ignored this brilliant hard working scholar, imagine that even the biblical authorities argued with Darwinian scholars when evolution started capturing the minds of scholars but not these Holocaust theologians.

    https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?author_id=5

    • Replies: @Paw
  12. Meimou says:

    Took me an hour to through but it was worth it. Wonderfully informative

    Reading about the persecutions of
    revisionist made me angry, but I take comfort in the fact the we have been winning the information war for some time; the number of dead [email protected] being reduced, the number of gas Chambers being reduced, push back in the comment sections against the official narrative…

    The holocau$t ON is on it’s last legs.

    holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com

    OT

    The links in the article are a must read for any anti holocauster researcher . If you are using android you can save them by using clipper+.

    • Replies: @Anon
  13. My revisionist story,

    I was a babe in the woods whistling and strolling here when that cruel man SS-Obersturmbannführer Wally selected me for the special treatment, he shoved me into the Gas Chamber and gave me the Leuchter and Rudolf Germar Prussian Blue treatment till I was completely stained blue then he shoved me into a Carlo Mattogno designed special oven and gave me a savage roasting till my old world view of the Holocaust went up in flames. And now here I am. Over a period of 3 months from Jan-March 2018 the old me got Shoahed.

    BTW a big shoutout to Wally.

  14. For a forum discussion I once made a list of my books on the WWII persecutions of the jews, nearly forty books.
    So I just glanced through the article.

    What I do not see mentioned is that ‘holocaust denial’ already is propaganda, denial in criminal cases exists when the crime is obvious.
    The holocaust discussion exists because the crime is not obvious.

    What I’m unable to understand is why nobody takes the trouble, apparently, to read a few books on how the concentration camps functioned, I listened them often enough.
    The descriptions are the same; the camps had self management, as had the ghetto in Warsaw.
    This management fed itself very well, Rassinier estimates them of 25% of the inmates.
    Unless food came in food packets, as with Rassinier, death in about six months time.
    Poliakov describes the same for the Warsaw ghetto.

    I’m not taking the trouble to list the books again, I just mention the authors I know: Elie Wiesel, Rassinier, Poliakov, Burg, nom de plume for Ginsberg, Kogon.
    After WWII Rassinier was thrown out of the French socialist party, it of course was impossible that camp management consisting of socialists and communists had misbehaved on this scale.
    Burg describes the exclusively jewish camp E of the river Bug, near Brest Litovsk.
    As Poliakov describes for the ghettohow, Burg describeshow rich jews ate well in good restaurant, he does not mention jewish deaths through hunger, but he does mention hungry children at the door of the restaurant.

    One more thing, Stephen J Gould explains the terrible situation in Bergen Belsen by the allies blocking any transport in Germany since early 1945, fighter bombers destroying anything that moved.
    Forgot in which book camp commanders are mentioned, desperately trying to find food.
    Of course also Zyklon B for delousing was no longer available, Anne Frank died of typhoid.

    • Replies: @JoeFour
  15. What a momentous day, I still can’t believe that it happened, I am trembling with excitement, how I wish I could take the day off and go to my room and open up a 15 year single malt and post on this 50 megaton thread. What a singularly courageous man our host is? He’s detonated all the bridges with his community – there’s no going back after this never ever.

  16. Once again a well written and researched essay. Ron it will be hard to ever get the truth out because the Jewish Gangbanging of Society is in full force. They invented the Social Mob Government that now runs the opinions of the Main Stream Media which as you said is in total control of the Jews. What we are seeing is Tribalistic Control of Society. As soon as anyone disagrees with anything the Social Mob of Facebook, Twitter and the rest of the clowns kick into gear. This is especially appealing to Blacks and other minorities who wish to riot, take down statues, and burn things. This isn’t much different to the way things work in Africa where for instance there are over 100 different Tribes fighting for control in places like Uganda. There is no time for reason or discussion. The Jews just kick these people into action. In Ferguson Michael Brown never had his hands up and tried to take the gun of the police officer. It doesn’t matter. These actors aren’t interested in truth or facts they demand some Cosmic Justice. The MSM during these riots just kept pouring more gasoline on the fire with lies and fake reports. When the Justice Dept. investigation by Obama’s Eric Holder was released no one cared about the truth the MSM went on to their next plan of attack. You cannot have a civilization with this type of mentality and that’s why we are doomed.

    Much of the Social Mob Movement in the US is funded by Soros and friends. Of course he is never criticized in the MSM because he is Jewish and that would be antisemitic. On the other side the so called Repubs have been bought out by Sheldon Anderson, the Zionist Jew who is a big supporter of the Holocaust Hoax and Israel’s wars with the US funding most of them. It seems hopeless because they have control of everything world wide and the view of everything is first filtered through a Jewish Lens before anyone sees it.

    Here are some interesting reads in line with the history that are seldom read:

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2013/the-sexual-decadence-of-weimar-germany/

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/torture-and-testicle-crushing-at-nuremberg/

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/german-victims-how-the-allied-victors-of-wwii-tortured-and-killed-their-german-prisoners-part-1-of-2/

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/german-victims-how-the-allied-victors-of-wwii-tortured-and-killed-their-german-prisoners-of-war-part-2-of-2/

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2013/the-liberation-of-the-death-camps/

  17. Polymath says:

    It seems like by far the best way to go about this is to estimate the pre-and post-war Jewish populations by all the usual methods historians and economists have tried. What, in your opinion, are the best attempts to do this?

    • Replies: @Don Chandler
    , @Occams
  18. utu says:

    I always thought that the reason Raul Hilberg’s book was not too popular (I did not know he had difficulty in publishing it.) was because it showed a very ugly picture of cooperation of Judenrats and Jewish police with Germans. Hannah Arendt had access to Hilberg’s book manuscript (which she did not acknowledge) and used it in her Einstein in Jerusalem (which was initially serialized by New Yorker) highlighting Jewish cooperation and passivity. I would not be surprised if both her Einstein in Jerusalem and Hilberg’s The Destruction of the European Jews were still not translated into Hebrew.

    Kapo (2000) is an Israeli documentary film about the Jewish kapos who collaborated with the Nazis in the concentration camps during World War II.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapo_(2000_film)

    The responses to the film were mixed, among Jewish and non-Jewish audiences alike. At a screening before a Jewish audience in Munich, Setton said that the younger members of the audience were pleased that someone had dared to broach the subject, while older audience members were outraged.[2] Only a censored version of the film was aired on German television in fear of a hostile reaction by the viewing audience. In France, opposition to the film was so severe that La 25e Heure, the show on which it was screened, was taken off the air.

    I wonder if the film was shown in Israel.

  19. [In] General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s The Second World War (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959). …. no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.

    This is a blatant lie by Faurrisson. Churchill in vol 6, p 597 (appendix C):

    Prime Minister to Foreign Secretary 11 July 44

    There is no doubt that this [persecution of Jews in Hungary and
    their expulsion from enemy territory] is probably the greatest and
    most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world,

    and it has been done by scientific machinery by nominally civilised
    men in the name of a great State and one of the leading races of
    Europe. It is quite clear that all concerned in this crime who may fall
    into our hands, including the people who only obeyed orders by
    carrying out the butcheries, should be put to death
    after their associa-
    tion with the murders has been proved.

    I cannot therefore feel that this is the kind of ordinary case which is
    put through the Protecting Power, as, for instance, the lack of feeding
    or sanitary conditions in some particular prisoners’ camp
    . There should
    therefore, in my opinion, be no negotiations of any kind on this
    subject. Declarations should be made in public, so that everyone
    connected with it will be hunted down and put to death.

    That is, dead Hungarian Jews in the German camps have fallen to “scientific machinery” used by “nominally civilized men in the name of a great State”, and not simply to poor “conditions in some particular prisoners’ camp”. The latter is the usual Holocaust revisionists’ explanation and Churchill is totally rejecting it in a letter written in July 1944 before the word “holocaust” had entered the lexicon. Instead, Churchill describes (and assumes as known to his Foreign Minister) the Germans as murdering the Hungarian Jews with scientific technology in what he calls the greatest crime of human history, with any involvement to be punished by death. Obviously his words also imply a massive scale to the murder by scientific machinery, of a similar order of magnitude to the Hungarian Jewish population. Which again happens to match the standard un-revised account.
    Incidentally, the camp used (according to the standard account) for scientifically murdering the Hungarian Jews was Auschwitz.

    https://archive.org/details/WinstonChurchillTheSecondWorldWarTriumphAndTragedyVolume6

    Eisenhower’s memoir barely mentions anything about Jews. You would not learn from his book, or Churchills’, or de Gaulle’s that Kristallnacht, boycotts, and Nuremberg laws had ever existed in Nazi Germany, or that Hitler had any negative thoughts about Jews. Nevertheless those things are extremely well documented and not disputed by historical revisionists (anti-historians). That a personal political memoir of the war doesn’t mention these events is more of an indicator that the author assumes that the reader is already familiar with them, than that they never occurred or are unimportant.

    Eisenhower in fact specifically anticipated Holocaust revisionism and made a point of being personally photographed at German concentration camps in front of piles of dead prisoners, to bear witness and (in his words) help pre-empt the possibility that some people would later dismiss the massacres as “mere propaganda”. He also demanded that photographs and films be made at the camps and witness testimony be taken, for the same reason. This, too, is fairly well known and documented enough to never have been a subject of any historical revisionism. Faurrison chose to be a weasel and say that Eisenhower, who made a point of documenting the Holocaust in 1945, suddenly maintained a suspicious silence on the matter in 1948. The more honest interpretation is that the army films of the camps that he himself had commissioned, and newspaper articles by reporters he had had invited into the camps, were in such wide circulation in the year or two after the German surrender that Eisenhower treated the basic facts of extermination camps as already known to the public. He was writing a memoir, not a textbook.

    Crusade in Europe http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.208955

    de Gaulle doesn’t mention Jews at all, not because nothing happened to them, but because the Vichy collaboration made the whole subject radioactive in France for decades after the war. Those are not points in dispute by revisionists, and Faurisson knew perfectly well that the lack of Jewish references in de Gaulle’s book has no bearing on any historical questions.

    This excerpt is the first I have read anything by Faurrisson, but the level of dishonesty he packed into a few sentences is entirely consistent with the appraisal of his credibility made at the time by everyone except his lone defender, Chomsky.

  20. Renoman says:

    Waaaaay tooooo looong!

    • Disagree: for-the-record
    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Meimou
    , @Anon
  21. Brabantian says: • Website

    From the website of Ron Unz’s fellow rebel Jew, Henry Makow in Canada – The story of Josef Ginsburg aka ‘Joseph G Burg’ (1908-90), the German-speaking Jew who:

    Had his books burned (!) repeatedly over many years by post-war, modern Germany, after he dared to question the official Shoah / Holocaust narrative

    A rabbi’s son who became a fervent Communist … Ginsburg joined advancing Soviet troops as part of official Soviet teams entering into & inspecting Nazi camps in Poland such as Auschwitz, Birkenau, Majdanek, Treblinka, & Sobibor, known today as the ‘death camps’

    As Ginsburg visited Auschwitz in 1945 & spoke to hundreds of surviving inmates, anti-Nazi Jew Ginsburg “formed the opinion that there were no ‘extermination’ camps at all, that gas chambers had never existed & that there had been no plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe.” Ginsburg said he could find no gas chambers which were not de-lousing stations, nor witnesses who had seen any

    Technically himself a ‘Holocaust survivor’, Ginsburg wrote books saying the ‘Holocaust’ was a fraud … West Germany’s government continually attacked Ginsburg, confiscating & burning 7 of Ginsburg’s 13 major books — the West German regime ice-cold to the irony of burning a Jew’s books over a much longer period than Nazis themselves ever did.

    Josef Ginsburg [gave] striking testimony at a Canadian ‘Holocaust denial’ trial of his friend Ernst Zündel … the Canadian crown prosecution refused to cross-examine him:

    http://www.zundelsite.org/archive/harwood/dsmrd/dsmrd24burg.html

    Ginsburg’s story is in process of being internet-scrubbed, close to being effectively ‘erased’ … the response to this Jewish writer & WW2 survivor was to burn his books & near-erase him from media & now the internet.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  22. Hilberg challenged the “4 million at Auschwitz” in his first edition. Another matter: Hannah Arendt’s motivation for blocking the publication of Hilberg’s work was not his conclusion of the German-lead destruction of European Jews, but rather his conclusion that Jews played an important role in the destruction.

    FWIW, Hilberg’s Memoirs of a Holocaust Historian discuss Dawidowicz and company in much negative detail.

    Hilberg was forced to abide by political correctness for the third (Yale) edition of his major work, where he devoted four pages of the US government’s standard version of Rwanda. Said propaganda was largely debunked by the defense at the various trials and appeals at Arusha, especially Military II. The US governmental psuedo-historical outfits e.g. Human Rights Watch continues to peddle the party line.

  23. Another matter. With regards to your lumping Hilberg with Dawidowicz and company, and lumping Finkelstein with Hilberg’s “Holocaust Denial” opponents, could you comment on Finkelstein and Birn’s A Nation On Trial?

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  24. Yevardian says:
    @utu

    Israelis are actually far more tolerant of such opinions and/or portrayals than the diaspora, or indeed probably most Western Europeans.

  25. @academic gossip

    Unz says:

    no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war

    You say:

    This is a blatant lie

    Churchill’s letter:

    the greatest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world

    Not a mention of “gas chambers”, “genocide”, or “six million”.

    it has been done by scientific machinery

    Not a mention of “gas chambers”, “genocide”, or “six million”.

    carrying out the butcheries

    Not a mention of “gas chambers”, “genocide”, or “six million”.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  26. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Renoman

    Did you read it? If not, then how would you know?

  27. Pointless discussion. There is level of exaggeration on both sides.
    I only want to point out one fact.
    The treatment of internees was relatively best in Germany ad was gradually worse depending on increased distance from Germany.

  28. Greg Bacon says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    I will point out that while he has flirted with outright Holocaust Denial in the past, David Irving has found and published on his website what he regards as irrefutable evidence that 2.5 million Jews were killed in the ‘Operation Reinhard’ camps alone.

    Link? None, as you won’t find any to back up your assertions.

    I purchased and read Mr. Irvings/ “Hitler’s War,” a magnificent 838 pages of that time–with over 100 pages of notes and sources–that goes into intimate detail about WWII. There is NO mention of Operation Reinhard, or ‘Aktion Reinhard’ in German.

    I checked Mr. Irving’s site and found “Holocaust Denial and Operation Reinhard.” Did some research at that link–below–but couldn’t find any definitive figures like you claim.

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/Belzec/Belzec%20etc.pdf

    And the ‘Final Solution’ phrase was warped by the holocaust junkies as the real term is TERRITORIAL Final Solution. Hitler did NOT want to mass-murder Juden, just round them up and move them to the new land conquered from Russia. Another ‘Pale of the Settlement,’ if you will.

    There are so many LIES told about the holocaust, how can anyone seriously believe the 6 million figure?
    Lies like the Nazi masturbation machine that literally milked Jew males to death. Or the giant electrical chair that could hold and electrocute 10,000 Juden at once?
    Or the secret Buck Rogers like invention, a space ray that vaporized 20,000 Auschwitz Jews all at once.
    Or the now disproved soap made from Jew ashes/fat. Or the human skin lamp shades. Or the giant steam chambers used to cook Jews to death. Another LIE.

    Shall I go on? I certainly can, but for brevity’s sake, I’ll stop with the LIES here.

    Tell me Mr. Wright, what made the Nazis help over 60,000 of German Jews move to Palestine, from 1933-42, even helping them set up industries, business and living quarters, which the Germans had to quit in 1942, since the war on the Eastern Front was going badly and the Germans needed those assets to help with the war?
    It was called “The Transfer Agreement” and it’s what got former London Mayor Livingstone in trouble with the holocaust fanatics because he mentioned a bit of truth from that period.

    Since the holocaust is listed as being from 1942-45, we’re supposed to believe that literally, overnight, the Germans went from helping Jews move to their nation of choice to pushing them in gas chambers?

    Sorry, but like someone already said, “Truth needs no defense; truth can stand on its own.”
    Evidently not in at least 17 European nations, where it is VERBOTEN to ask questions about that time.
    Even asking a sensible question like, “Why did the Auschwitz sign declaring that four million were killed here get changed to a little over 1 million, and that included Gypsies, criminal, political dissidents, Commies etc. Ask that and risk getting arrested, tried, convicted and heavily fined while you sit in prison for five years.
    Ditto for the numbers at Majdanek, which dropped from around 600,000 to around 70,000, but don’t ask why, unless you want to go to prison.

    When someone tells that many lies and then gets horrified when people don’t believe their BS, it’s their own fault for telling such whoppers to begin with.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute, Druid
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Stan d Mute
  29. @Brabantian

    Burg, Ginsberg, feared for his life.
    The last pages of J.G. Burg, Schuld und Schicksal, Europas Juden zwischen Henkern und Heuchlern, München, 1962 state that in case of his death a Swiss solicitor would automatically publish documents in the possession of the solicitor.

    • Replies: @Anon
  30. brander says:

    I would like to raise attention to David Cole, the Jewish Revisionist of http://www.takimag.com

    He has written a book about his experience as a Jewish holocaust revisionist, “Republican Party Animal”

    • Replies: @conatus
  31. @Hippopotamusdrome

    Scientific ?
    The description of the asserted gas chambers, and how they functioned, show something far from scientific, on the contrary, primitive.
    This is one of the reasons these gas chambers for humans are improbable, the highly efficiënt Germans not devising an efficiënt killing and cremation process.
    Any chicken slaughter factory is more scientific.

    • Replies: @Anon
  32. dearieme says:

    “aside from Milch, Hitler’s military contained over a dozen half-Jewish generals and admirals and another dozen quarter-Jews of that same high rank, plus a total of roughly 150,000 additional half- or quarter-Jewish soldiers”: one explanation immediately suggests itself. (Whether it is anywhere near the mark I have no idea.)

    Perhaps many Germans were not much worried about assimilated German Jews, especially if they were seen as valuable to the military and if unconnected to Bolshevism. Perhaps German hatred was directed mainly at East European Jews.

    Then again, maybe views simply differed among the Germans.

    • Agree: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @syonredux
    , @Wally
  33. Bucky says:

    While a lot of it likely is exaggerated, especially the part about Germany using scarce resources to perpetuate the killings while they were losing the war, saying that “only” 1.5 million were killed vs 3.5 million is splitting hairs.

    Given widespread scapegoating occurring before the war, and how Hitler was the leader, it only makes sense that some sort of attitude would take a hold among the bureaucracy in Germany. Though the vast majority likely were simply shot. Because if the goal is extermination of Jews, the most direct way to that goal is shooting, not constructing a camp.

    But if the real number is say, 2 million, that is still a tragedy.

  34. This should be fun. Pass the popcorn.

  35. Both of these simple facts have been widely accepted in America throughout my entire lifetime. But combine them together with the relatively tiny size of worldwide Jewry, around 16 million prior to World War II, and the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close. And yet, by the astonishing alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years have somehow been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a transformation so seemingly implausible that future generations will surely be left gasping in awe.

    I do hope nothing happens to you.

  36. Svigor says:

    Mark Ames, Mark Ames…that name seems familiar. Ohhh, right, now I remember; Ames is one of the moral cretins who managed to run Russia’s most popular “edgy,” “independent,” English-language paper in post-Soviet Russia without mentioning the Jewishness of the Russian oligarchs. Or without much mentioning the Jewish “Russian” oligarchs at all.

    Yeah, I remember those guys.

    The idea of them calling anyone out for moral turpitude is laughable. Anyone who takes that shit seriously never read The Exile.

  37. Never forget: ‘One may not ask oneself whether such mass murder was technically possible. It was technically possible because it happened.’ (Le Monde, 21 February 1979, 34 French historians)

  38. @Colin Wright

    Actually, the only significant area of controversy I see is whether Hitler knew and approved. There’s no clear evidence. Irving argues he didn’t — I’d guess he did. That particular question could do with some dispassionate analysis.

    Of course he did. Rebirth through ordeal & fire was the center of his world-view, Jews being considered to be something like pestilence, or rats who destroy high culture through their intrinsic & unalterable pervy rottenness.

    Hitler’s apologists do him disservice by portraying him as some uninformed hick. He was not a great leader comparable to Alexander, Caesar or Napoleon (these guys were almost superhuman), but he remains one of 3-4 most important 20th C political figures (Lenin, Stalin, Mao could be competitors, although I would choose Lenin over the rest).

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @peterAUS
    , @Svigor
  39. phil says:
    @Colin Wright

    Irving’s conclusion was based on the Korherr Report and the German term for “special treatment” of the Jews. The report concerned what was claimed to be an enormous reduction in the Jewish population in “Europe.” It included mention of the more than 1.2 million Jews who had been sent to the Reinhardt camps in what had been Eastern Poland. Sometimes “special treatment” (in German) did indeed refer to killing.

    However, Carlo Mattogno in the Holocaust Handbooks (esp. SOBIBOR) has argued that the “special treatment” involved rounding up and sending Jews to what were actually transit camps. The camps were not outfitted with any crematoria, whereas other camps which no one regarded as “death camps” did have them–death from disease and other natural causes being very substantial. Many Jews were then deported into the western part of the USSR, which the German military had occupied.

    Korherr refers to the camps as having been “evacuation stations” and in Section X he refers to the “Eastern Territories” (east of Poland) as being counted by him as “off-going,” which meant they were no longer being considered as part of “Europe.” So it’s possible that Irving’s interpretation is wrong and that what you refer to as the minimum figure for the Holocaust may be well under 1 million. Rather than being killed, the deported Jews were no longer “Europeans.”

  40. Very long, but well worth the effort. Ron Unz’s writings are the marks of a highly disciplined, superb mind and his work on historical revisionism is truly remarkable for its far reach into the relevant documents, its measured, dispassionate approach, and the courage to challenge an orthodoxy of vast power and unlimited resources. This piece, perhaps, more than any of his others, reinforces his broader “American Pravda” thesis that our major cultural institutions (media, entertainment industry, schools and universities) and government flourish are ruthless instruments of propaganda.

    Also, a recent outing of yet another fake holocaust survivor, this one a Spaniard, Enric Marco, from Catalonia detailed in a recently published book, The Impostor, by Javier Cercus reviewed by the famous Peruvian novelist, Mario Vargas Llosa in El Pais (Spanish) and the Wall Street Journal. https://elpais.com/elpais/2014/12/11/opinion/1418316858_779129.html
    Marco (now in his 90s), seems to be a sort of Iberian Elie Wiesel, outed a short while ago after a decade long, high-profile career of peddling his fictitious history, including a stint in Mauthausen, in prestigious venues.

    Typically, the historian who outed him has taken abuse.

  41. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Here’s a book I read from the UCLA library. I couldn’t find it on amazon. Its probably in other college libraries and since it was published in translation in the US there must be a copy in the Library of Congress. Library of Congress will make and send copies of books if requested

    Author Rabbi Chaim Michael Dov Weissmandel. Book title From the Depths in English Min haihzeitzar in Hebrew. The Hebrew word means depths of despair.

    He was the civil and religious leader of a large Jewish community in Slovakia and Hungary that was destroyed during the war. He claims the destruction was a joint effort by the Zionist communists and Germans

    He got through the war and ended up in the US. First wife and children died in Auschwitz

    His book claims that the Zionist and communist Jews worked with the Germans to kidnap children and teens to convert them to communism and Zionism and send them to Palestine to create Israel and the new Zionist socialist communist Jewish people.

    He claims the communist Zionist Jews helped the Germans to kill off the religious and socially and economically conservative Jews.

    Weissmandel succeeded in getting some of his people to Russia. The Russians placed them and other Jewish refugees on the collective farms. That was fine.

    But the Zionists were in charge of the Jews on the farms and immediately separated the kids and teens from the parents and Rabbis. The kids were indoctrinated in communism and Zionism and sent through the smuggling routes to Palestine to be the new Zionist Jews.

    Weissmandel touches a bit in the Zionist Jews the Germans put in charge of the ghettoes as well. His thesis is that the destruction of European Jews was a conspiracy between the communist Zionists and the Germans with the Zionists as enthusiastic as the Germans.

    Motive of the zionists; get rid of the religious and bourgeois capitalist nuclear family good table manners comfortable home marriage and children homemaker wife provider husband type of Jews. And create the New Jew Zionist socialist working mothers kids raised in kibbutz childcare centers women in the military in combat free love as it was called then.

    The good Rabbi was very bitter about it all.

    It’s quite a book. If it’s in the UCLA library it must be in the Stanford and other college libraries

    • Replies: @Mike P
    , @Anon
  42. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @academic gossip

    It’s pretty well known that Eisenhower decided to film, take photos and make a visual record of the camps as soon as he saw them.

  43. Two of the best books on the subject, not mentioned here and both now banned by Amazon:

    The Great Holocaust Trial (2010 Edition) by Michael Hoffman
    Covers the 1985 trial and subsequent re-prosecution of Ernst Zündel in Canada, which pitted Faurisson, Butz, Leuchter, Irving, and Zündel himself, against the most famous eyewitness survivers, as well as defenders of holocaust orthodoxy such as Raul Hilberg.

    Despite unfair limitations imposed by pro-prosecution judges on the defense team, Zündel’s defense team destroyed the traditional narrative in two separate trials. The prosecution eyewitnesses all fell apart on cross-examination, and Hilberg was forced to admit that he not only relied on a single untrustworthy document for his account on Auschwitz, but that he concealed the problems in his source material from his audience (see the Kurt Gerstein affidavit). Zündel was convicted anyway, mostly due to the judges instructing jurors how to vote on the issue of whether the Holocaust happened. But both convictions in Canada were ultimately reversed on appeal.

    This book is critical, because it is a first hand account of the only instances in which the claims of the pro-Holocaust theorists have ever been subject to cross-examination in court. All future kangaroo court judges avoided this embarrassment in the future by taking “judicial notice” that the Holocaust happened.

    Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides by Thomas Dalton
    A must-read intro, which summarizes the most compelling arguments for and against the Holocaust narrative. The author claims to have begun his research favorable to the orthodoxy, but ended clearly in the revisionist camp.

    • Replies: @J. Masterson
  44. Meimou says:
    @Colin Wright

    As to why not many paid attention to the Holocaust before 1961 — it’s bloody dull

    A weak explanation. The most likely explanation is that the OS is a lie, it doesn’t help you that Eisenhower and Churchill didn’t mention it in their books.

    Why the Allies didn’t use it as wartime propaganda?

    How do you keep the murder of millions s secret anyway?

    If it was so “dull” why did the OS get more important over time?

    • Replies: @Henry's Cat
    , @Colin Wright
  45. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:

    I perused this article and will go back to read it more slowly. But damn, Ron Unz has totally shattered my confidence in believing any of the official narrative. My knowledge of history is wholly inadequate and I always try to rectify this. But now I hesitate to undertake any historical self-education for fear I might be doing damage (garbage in).

    When I read reviews on Amazon regarding math books, I always cringe and run away when I read a reviewer mention that a book contains many errors. I don’t have confidence in my ability to spot these errors, especially in a subject new to me, and fear I might be vitiated for life by “knowing” wrong information. And worse, being wrong with confidence.

    It’s funny, but prior to the rise of Trump and the complete and jaw-dropping exposure of the blatant lies and fabrication of news and the official narrative, I wonder if I would’ve been receptive to Unz’s American Pravda pieces. Mostly likely not. I think I’d dismiss them outright in a Lipstadtian “come on”.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  46. @utu

    and used it in her Einstein in Jerusalem

    [Freudian?] slip?

    • Replies: @utu
  47. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome

    And the last words of the article are “the numbers are unbelievable”!

  48. @Colin Wright

    “David Irving has found and published on his website what he regards as irrefutable evidence that 2.5 million Jews were killed in the ‘Operation Reinhard’ camps alone.”

    If I’m wrong, please link to the Irvin site explaining this, but from my understanding, his “irrefutable evidence” is a single decoded telegram that he interprets to describe fatalities at the Reinhard camps.

    Others who translated this document say it only describes arrivals at the camps, not necessarily deaths.

    I think Irving damn well knows the difference, but after 20 years of abuse, imprisonment and terrorism, he’s a broken man at this point. Poor chap.

  49. @Johan Meyer

    What nation on trial, the jewish or the German ?
    Anyone can know that GB wanted WWI, it could not compete economically with the Germany united in 1870 by the French attack.
    On top of that, GB feared German economic expansion to the SE, the Berlin Bagdad railway, that would have given Germany access to the Mosul oil fields, on top of that GB feared export from Basra of German products to India.
    The line was to be extended to Basra.
    Versailles was designed to keep Germany weak forever.
    At the time it was seen as a jewish conference, Bernard Baruch and Frankfurter for example were there.
    Wilson was an important man there, Morgenthau had financed his election.
    Alas for GB, Versailles was so stupid that Germany came into such misery and poverty that it democratically elected Hitler, who took full power.
    This full power enabled Schacht to resurrect Germany economically in just three years.
    Thus, a new war, as Churchill said ‘the whole period 1914 1945 can best be seen as one long war’.
    Jews were important in the second war against Germany, the jewish declaration of war in 1933.
    As to Hitler wanting to deminish jewish influence in Germany, see the statistics in
    Ismar Schorsch, ‘Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870 – 1914′, New York 1972

    • Replies: @Johan Meyer
  50. @Anon.Benefactor

    24 French ‘intellectuals’.
    Very stupid people, the assertion that it happened used as an ‘argument’ that thus it was technically possible.

  51. Meimou says:
    @academic gossip

    Eisenhower in fact specifically anticipated Holocaust revisionism and made a point of being personally photographed at German concentration camps in front of piles of dead prisoners, to bear witness and (in his words) help pre-empt the possibility that some people would later dismiss the massacres as “mere propaganda”.

    Revisionist don’t refute that prisoners died in large numbers. How did the piles of dead prisoner die?

    He also demanded that photographs and films be made at the camps and witness testimony be taken, for the same reason. This, too, is fairly well known and documented enough to never have been a subject of any historical revisionism

    No one refutes the existence of camps, so you don’t get a point for bringing it upWhat was the nature of this witness testimony? Does it substantiate genocide?

    Stop knocking down strawman.

  52. Meimou says:
    @Renoman

    Waaaaay to short an attention span!

  53. @Anon

    Indeed, of the misery the allies, especially the USA, had caused: Stephen Jay Gould in:
    Wim Kayzer, ‘Een Schitterend Ongeluk, Wim Kayzer ontmoet Oliver Sacks, Stephen Jay Gould, Stephen Toulmin, Daniel C. Dennett, Rupert Sheldrake en Freeman Dyson’, 1993 Amsterdam

    • Replies: @Anon
  54. DFH says:
    @Svigor

    Ames is one of the moral cretins who managed to run Russia’s most popular “edgy,” “independent,” English-language paper in post-Soviet Russia without mentioning the Jewishness of the Russian oligarchs. Or without much mentioning the Jewish “Russian” oligarchs at all.

    But they did mention their Jewishness many times, including a piece with little profiles of the oligarchs called ‘The Jews; Where are they now?’. This even made its way (through plagiarism) into the Guardian.

    http://exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=8575&IBLOCK_ID=35

  55. Anonymous[142] • Disclaimer says:

    Holocaust denial is a red-herring, used by the Zios to whatever advantage it might add to any given scenario.

    World War II is over. The disposition of individuals in several concentration/detainment camps in the 1940s is entirely, dismissively irrelevant. In 2018, it makes absolutely no difference at all, and discussion of it, in any form, has one and only one effect: to aid and protect Zionist dominance of world economy and world political conditions.

    • Replies: @Anon
  56. @Colin Wright

    Lipstadt knows how to write.
    When I had read
    Deborah Lipstadt, ‘Denying the holocaust’, 1993, New York
    now some fifteen years ago, when I still believed mainstream history, I was upset about those denying this historical truth.
    I now call Lipstadt Lyingstadt, her book is just lies and accusations, without any factual basis.
    A similar book is
    Brigitte Hammann, ‘Hitler’s Vienna, A Dictator’s Apprenticeship’, Oxford New York, 1999

  57. Hans says:

    Here’s a link to the Charlie Hebdo (((double standard))) firing of Sine: I’m not Charlie . . . I’m Maurice Sinet, fired by Charlie for anti-semitism – https://shareverything.com/2015/01/14/im-not-charlie-im-maurice-sine-fired-by-charlie-for-anti-semitism/

    Great and essential work Mr. Unz! Bravo!

    • Replies: @Hrw-500
  58. @Colin Wright

    I will point out that while he has flirted with outright Holocaust Denial in the past, David Irving has found and published on his website what he regards as irrefutable evidence that 2.5 million Jews were killed in the ‘Operation Reinhard’ camps alone.

    You refer, no doubt, to the so-called Hoefle telegram. By ‘found’ you unfortunately give the wrong impression that Irving discovered it himself. But how does he extrapolate from the 1.25 million sent to the camps (that’s minus the 25,000 sent to Majdanek) to the end of 1942 to 2.5 million by the end of 1943? The revisionist position, as you know, is that these were transit camps. Irving, if he wished to argue in good faith, would have to have subjected the alleged methods of mass gassings and body disposal at the camps to the same scrutiny that he’d applied to Auschwitz.

  59. A few notes to this stimulating article….
    1. My father played good golf before WW2 at a moderately overweight 210 lbs. When released from German POW camp in 1945 he weighed about 115 lb. Easy to see why the Belsen and Buchenwald corpses and survivors looked as they did. Easy to see too why Auschwicz guards wouldn’t have to kill many of the inmates they induced to leave when whatever deadly activities previously practised had been prudently abandoned.
    2. What happened at Wannsee conference? Crucial if not decisive.
    3. What were the before and after figures for Jews in the part of (western) Poland occupied by Germany from September 1939?
    4. What were the before and after figures for Hungarian Jews who seem to have been the biggest group of Jewish Auschwicz victims?
    5. Why did Jewish women and children have to be transported from France, Belgium and Holland?
    4. The big question you don’t define: what is the Holocaust story you are casting doubt on? Was there perhaps no plan with or without Hitler’s approval which covers the said transport of women and children? Granted the Einsatzgruppen *could* have been aimed mainly to kill enemies comprehensively with Jews naturally classed with Communists, and granted that the numbers of Jews actually killed were probably well under 6 million is there really a problem in believing that, if a Final Solution was agreed at Wannsee, extermination was agreed after other possible solutions had failed? After all “extermination” had been suggested for the Jews before, by anti-Dreyfusards in France and by Kaiser Wilhelm ll. And there are plenty of precedent uses in America.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @peterAUS
  60. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    The Diary of Anne Frank was written by Meyer Levin, a prolific early and mid 20th century American author.

    Otto Frank went to New York and contracted with Levin to write the book based on Anne’s real diary for $50,000 Levin wrote the book. Frank didn’t pay him. Levin sued Frank. Levin used the copy of Anne’s real diary as proof that the published Levin book was very different from Anne’s diary.

    Levin won his case and was awarded the money owed. Frank never did pay him.

    There are always new translations and lost pages published to great publicity and angst.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Wally
  61. utu says:
    @for-the-record

    Must be but I do not know what it suppose to signify.

  62. Ron Unz, the greatest Athenian of our time. Thank you so much.

    Readers may like to know that if the 2012 documentary Auschwitz: The Surprising Hidden Truth is blocked for them on YouTube, it can be watched on the Internet Archive, here.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  63. @Anonymous

    The interesting thing about truth is that it is consistent.
    It was, maybe even this is changing, impossible to control any writing.
    Thus inconsistencies show what it true and what is not.
    But it takes a lot of time an effort to see through the lies.
    A few books do not suffice.

    An maybe interesting example is the assertion that Hess had never met the Scottish count to whom he was flying in May 1941, thus making his peace mission improbable, or a lunatic act;
    Yet Hess had breakfast with this count during the 1936 Berlin Olympic games:
    Robert Rhodes James, ‘CHIPS, The Diaries of Sir Henry Channon’, London 1967
    Even
    Lynn Picknett, Clive Prince and Stephen Prior, ‘Double standards, The Rudolf Hess cover-up’, London 2002 does not mention this meeting.

    Another example is the letter attributed to our late Prince Bernhard, written to Hitler, asking him te let him, Bernard, rule the Netherlands.
    There was considerable controvery if this letter was ever written.
    However, writing the letter is completely consistent with the last mentioned book, that concludes that Hess died in an unexplained flying boat accident in Scotland, in which also a brother of the British king was killed.
    Bernard dined with the brother the day before the accident.
    The flying boat is supposed to have been on its way to Stockholm, to declare peace between Germany and GB, Hitler stepping down, Hess replacing him.

    For those seeing conspiracies anywhere, it was an accident, the pilot in ascending from a Scottish lake where Hess came on board chose the wrong, higher valley.
    There was a body to many when the wreckage was examined.
    There never was an official explanation what the, for the time, huge flying boat was doing in starting from a small lake.
    The extra body, also never explained officially.
    The Hess at Nüremberg, and in Spandau, was not the real Hess, the USA prison doctor explained this is a book.
    Who he was, w’ll never know, I suppose.

  64. @Greg Bacon

    I find it very difficult to believe that any legislation in Europe could be so illiberal and so stupid as to make it an offence, let alone one for which the penalty might be imprisonment, to draw attention to the change in numbers said to be killed at Auschwicz. Would you please back up you assertions with sources/links and quotes.

    • Replies: @Greg Bacon
  65. @Greg Bacon

    Therein lies the immense value of Ron’s exhaustive effort here. It’s not a question of “did Jews suffer during WWII” – hell, everyone suffered. It’s debunking the propaganda that Jews are the most special people and most extraordinary victims in all human existence. What difference does it make if 6 million or 6 hundred thousand really? Or killed by firing squad or gas chamber? Both are better than the typhus and starvation that likely killed most of them. And Jews surely suffered no more than many German, French, and Eastern European Yeshuans.

    The greatest benefit of Ron’s work is showing (1) the Jews had agency and (2) we’ve all been fed a nonstop diet of lies about essentially everything (holocaust included) for our entire lives.

  66. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    7I think the expression “scientific” was picked up from Churchill’s communication with the Foreign Secretary. It is just the kind of expression a layman might have adopted as a shorthand way of making a distinction between using electricity or gas rather than shooting or hanging.

    In answer to your point about likely German methods you should consider how efficient it was to (allegedly) persuade people they were going to be cleansed/deloused so their resistance would not be roused, and then to drop poison on them from above. No need for higher level science or engineering.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  67. @Bucky

    You omit to notice that Germany’s labor shortage was made up for by slave or otherwise forced labor. If they were Jews who were lowest on the list for survival they could just be worked and starved to death.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wally
    , @bucky
  68. “…Surely no zealous theologian of the European Dark Ages would have reacted any differently…”

    Look up “summa” and Thomas Aquinas. You may change your mind.

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  69. Che Guava says:

    My own sequence, and thanks to Mr. Unz for also noticing most.

    Being at a western university, where Mr. Irving (certainly far more deserving of an honorary doctorate than most holders of that empty title) was ‘no-platformed’ by a combination of the Zionist and Trotskyist students.

    I did not understand the reasons at the time, but knowing he was a military historian with a great reputation, the offense against freedom of expression really annoyed me.

    Saw a couple of TV documentaries that had info. from Leuchter and Gelmar, among others, in retrospect, think that was the main factor driving the wasp’s nest into hyperactivity, the simple fact that the narrative was being questioned on television.

    I read The Painted Bird, then later found out it was a total fake.

    Saw and later read Slaughterhouse 5, later found that Vonnegut, a direct witness of the Dresden atrocity, was essentially forced to write Mother Night as a mea culpa for it.

    Read a couple of the popular Holocaust porn novels from Israel, translated into English, thinking, oh, so sad, then noticing the small-print disclaimers ‘This is entirely a work of fiction.’

    As something of a student of military history, I was thinking ‘Why were the presumably logical military giving priority to transport for this, when they were having much more pressing needs?’ In the end, I was realising it was likely just not true.

    Am glad that you mention the magazine Marco Polo , I enjoyed it in general, though do not have a copy of the banned issue, unfortunately only saw it and briefly scanned at a book shop.

    The reaction, as you say, was crazy, that was the factor pushing me into absolute scepticism.

    Still makes me wonder what power the Holocaustians were using to close the mag., have people fired and resign.

    Perhaps the US embassy.

    Doubt that it was the Israeli, because the campaign of Israeli illegal workers for a ‘Holocaust’ museum in an outer Tokyo suburb abt. seven yrs. later collapsed when the govt. cracked down on Israeli illegal workers around that time. Nothing to do with the stupid museum project, just because they were doing illegal work and trading, including illegal drugs.

    It was nice to see the posters for their stupid museum project disappear at the time.

  70. nglaer says:
    @academic gossip

    Nice little bit of research and knowledge, needed and appreciated.

  71. @Colin Wright

    The story, Moishe, is not the hoax. The story is that we can tell the goyim what they are allowed and what they are not allowed to think. And they do as they are told, and make it the law.

  72. @Meimou

    The Western Allies did use the alleged gassing of Jews as propaganda during the last couple of years of the war and through until at least the end of the Nuremberg trials. A plausible theory as to why it was largely abandoned is that the Communist threat became paramount and, besides, West Germany had been completely pacified already.

    The re-birth of the Holocaust as a cultural phenomenon didn’t happen in 1961; it kicked off in the late 1960s. Novick (or is it Finkelstein?) argues that Jewish political organizations used it in the wake of the Six Day War in 1967 as a tool to garner sympathy for Israel. Once the ball and the cash got rolling it took on a momentum all of its own…

  73. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    That’s true. You’re right He just took photos and didn’t go into the allied bombings that disrupted Germany and supplies to the camps.

  74. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Renoman

    Read it when you have the time. It’s not a short read it while drinking morning coffee article.

  75. utu says:
    @Che Guava

    ‘Why were the presumably logical military giving priority to transport for this, when they were having much more pressing needs?’

    Just the other day I was reading wiki entry on Field Marshal Erich von Manstein. In April 1944 he was dismissed by Hitler and went on medical leave. Then in October 1944 he bought an estate in East Pomerania.

    What was he thinking? How did he pay for the estate and who sold it?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @lysias
  76. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Thanks for the information

  77. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:

    I believe in the Holocaust, but I think the numbers were much much lower than stated and I think Jews were definately complicit thenselves.

    No matter how many Jewish bussinesses were vandalized, many Jews liked Germany and considered themselves more German than Jew. I think the extreme Zionist wing used the holocaust as a way to eliminate the undesirable Jews that opposed Isreal and were too German.

    • Replies: @Felix Krull
    , @Wally
  78. EugeneGur says:

    Before the war, millions of Jews had lived in Eastern Europe, and after the war, those communities had mostly vanished. This undeniable fact has long stood as an implicit central pillar of the traditional Holocaust narrative. . . vast numbers of Polish Jews had been transported by the Soviets to locations deep within their territory..

    Yes, some Jews were evacuated ahead of the advancing German troops, some ran away on their own knowing what was in store for them – what does it prove? The remaining ones, however, were exterminated. For example, in Crimea alone about half of the pre-War Jews escaped before the German occupation, but the remaining half was killed – almost all of them – approximately 40,000.

    The German conducted complete clearance on the Soviet territory, and most Soviet Jews never even made it to the concentration camps. This applied to the civil population as well as to the Russian Army. Every group of POW was sorted, with Jews and communists most often killed on the spot, and there are millions of testimonies to that.

    Obviously, the number is imprecise. Perhaps, the Nazis left good records in the concentrations camps, but in most mass massacres on the Soviet territory the exact numbers are unknown, and the estimates vary pretty widely.

    However, no matter how you minimize the total number (and how do you know that at a closer look it’s going to go down, not up?), the fact remains: the Nazis targeted the Jews for extermination based on their nationality, and that the definition of holocaust.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Wally
    , @peterAUS
  79. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    If there weren’t holocaust denial, the Jews would create it; just as they created the myth of the late 19th century E European pogroms to facilitate the mass immigration to America, S Africa and W. Europe

    I can always tell when the Israeli Bonds and AIPAC fundraisers are coming to town, there’s a rash of anti Semitic threats, mostly graffiti on the walls of Jewish buildings. It’s to spread fear of “ “ it could happen again if we don’t give money to AIPAC”

    A lot of the Jewish buildings in Los Angeles are fortified with huge 10 foot walls, security guards at the gate showing dr licenses to enter.

  80. @Meimou

    ‘How do you keep the murder of millions s secret anyway?

    If it was so “dull” why did the OS get more important over time?’

    It wasn’t a secret. My father had an enormous library of World War Two books — most dating from the fifties. I started reading them around 1964; I can remember several books dealing with the extermination of the jews in his collection.

    Of course the Holocaust happened. It’s tedious that there are so many who so monotonously insist otherwise.

    Ironically, the problem is that they’re dull too.

  81. Antiwar7 says:
    @Che Guava

    Mother Night was published 7 years before Slaughterhouse-Five.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  82. utu says:
    @Che Guava

    Saw and later read Slaughterhouse 5, later found that Vonnegut, a direct witness of the Dresden atrocity, was essentially forced to write Mother Night as a mea culpa for it.

    You are confabulating. Mother Night was published seven years before Slaughterhouse 5.

    Vonnegut published Slaughterhouse 5 (which imo is one of the greatest anti-war novels) during the Vietnam War. The U.S. was bombing Vietnam for over 4 years already. East Germany was permitted by Soviets to present Dresden bombing as the greatest atrocity by American and British allies against civilians. The bombings of German cities were referred to as terrorist bombings just as the American bombings of Vietnam. After Germany’s reunification this stopped and building of new narrative aiming at British-German reconciliation was started. German and British historians got very busy to drive the number of dead in Dresden from over 100,000 to below 25,000 in a futile attempt to achieve parity with Coventry (178 killed) that presumably was to justify the bombing of Dresden. You see, lowering the number of German victims is OK while any attempts to lower Jewish victim is a crime.

    Vonnegut most likely was influenced by 1963 David Irving’s The Destruction of Dresden. What is interesting that Poland produced a very sympathetic to German suffering film about Dresden (Tonight a City Will Die) already in 1961. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonight_a_City_Will_Die. The film is available with Russian subtitles at Youtube:

    Сегодня ночью погибнет город / Tonight a City Will Die (1961)

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Che Guava
  83. One of the curiosities about Lipstadt (and others) is that she has her academic position at the otherwise rather unnoticed Emory University.

    Emory came to a settlement concerning accusations that its school of dentistry discriminated against Jewish applicants in the past. Now it appears to have a school of Holocaust worship/Israel support (the two tend to involve the same people).

    I mention this because Lipstadt isn’t the only such character I’ve seen connected with Emory. A few years back, on another board, some self-appointed advocate of Israel showed up who evidently considered himself a great intellectual showed up and started trying to ‘reason’ with us. I remember tearing him a new one to my complete satisfaction — but the point is that he was a ‘professor’ of Holocaustry at Emory as well.

    I’d be interested to know the precise terms of the settlement Emory reached in the anti-semitism suit.

  84. anarchyst says:

    If one honestly investigates the jewish holocaust ™ and comes to the conclusion that many of the claims concerning the jewish holocaust ™ are not only false but scientifically impossible, one can still be prosecuted for “improper thoughts”.
    You see, in Canada, and in many European countries, ANY deviation from the official holocaust ™ fable is punishable by fines and imprisonment. In addition, Canadian and European courts utilize the concept of “judicial notice” in which “commonly accepted beliefs” are sacrosanct, even if they can be proven false. Defendants in these “kangaroo courts” are not permitted to enter into evidence PROOF that certain holocaust ™ claims are indeed false, EVEN IF THEY CAN BE PROVEN SO. “Judicial notice”, in itself, turns the concept of “equal justice under law” on its head, and lends credibility to the fact that these “kangaroo courts” are not interested in the TRUTH, but have a deeper, far more insidious purpose–keeping the (false) claims of the jewish holocaust ™ alive and safe from scrutiny.
    You see, TRUTH is not part of these “kangaroo courts”. The jewish holocaust ™ has been turned into a “religion” in which NO deviation from the “official story” (orthodoxy) is allowed–even when holocaust ™ claims can be proven to be false.
    It is said that the light of day is the best disinfectant–except when it comes to “all things holocaust ™”.
    Monika Schaefer…
    Ursula Haverbeck…
    Both are grandmothers who are serving hard-time in German maximum-security prisons for daring to deviate from the “official” jewish holocaust ™ story.
    Question to holocaust ™ promoters…why are you so afraid of the TRUTH?

  85. anarchyst says:

    There is NOT ONE DOCUMENT outlining any extermination plan for jews or others. In fact, prominent Zionists collaborated with the German government and formulated plans at the highest level of the German government for the “transfer” of jews to what was then known as Palestine. Absolutely nothing about extermination.

    Official International Red Cross figures for all camp “deaths” total around 731,000–NOT “6 million”. In fact, population totals pre-WW2 and post-WW2 show an INCREASE in the jewish population in post-WW2 Europe immediately after the cessation of the war…

    If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD IT KEEP RECORDS?? WHY would it build “camps” hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, medical, recreational and other ancillary facilities? Would it not have been easier to just “eliminate” them without going through all of this trouble? Why would they expend massive effort on logistical movement utilizing their limited energy resources if the goal was extermination? Things do not “add up”…

    Something BIG “stinks” in this whole jewish “holocaust ™” deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made “deals” with the German government in order to make life “uncomfortable” for jewish Germans. In fact, it was jewish Zionist leaders who first proposed that all jews wear the “yellow Star of David” armband so that they could be easily identified. German jews considered themselves Germans first and had no desire to emigrate.

    The establishment of a “homeland” along with the 6,000,000 figure was a Zionist “dream” since the 1800s. Many periodicals of the day starting with the 1800s touted the “six-million” figure.

    What better way to encourage “emigration” to a foreign land than to make things difficult for the “cream of German society” (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” is out . . .

    As cremation of ONE human body takes hours, the amount of time claimed by holocaust ™ promoters is a physical, scientific and statistical impossibility. Their claims also do not account for the “downtime” that crematoria require for maintenance, etc. In addition, there are no mass burial sites that are commensurate with the claims of “six-million” or even “one-million”. There is also a jewish prohibition on excavation of claimed possible burial sites. WHY?? Because THEY DO NOT EXIST. There is even a prohibition on the use of ground penetrating radar to search for burial sites. WHY?? If millions were gassed and cremated, the activities would have lasted well into the 1950s.

    The so-called jewish “holocaust ™” has been turned into a de-facto “religion” in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish “holocaust ™” truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the “tribe” that FEAR the real truth of the jewish “holocaust ™” being exposed is evident. A questionable judicial “trick” used in “holocaust ™” trials is that of “judicial notice” in which TRUTH CANNOT BE USED AS A DEFENSE OR ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE IN THE “KANGAROO COURTS” THAT PROSECUTE THOSE WHO DARE TO INVESTIGATE THIS HISTORICAL EVENT. Judicial notice, once invoked against a defendant, disallows the introduction of evidence that does not conform to “commonly accepted beliefs” about the “holocaust ™”, EVEN IF THE EVIDENCE EXPOSES THE “HOLOCAUST ™” LIES AND FABRICATIONS THAT CAN EASILY BE DEBUNKED. A question for you “holocaust ™” promoters–why are there laws that criminalize the search for truth?? What are you afraid of??

    When the truth about this historical event comes out, it will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a “cash cow” that “keeps on giving”. . . “there’s NO business like “SHOAH business”. Zionist complicity in this event is carefully “covered up”.

    A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question “official” jewish “holocaust” orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the “official” jewish “holocaust” story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to “all things holocaust ™”. Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment.

    The latest “vicitms” of “holocaustianity ™” are Ursula Haverbeck and Monika Schaefer, both grandmothers who have been prosecuted and sentenced to maximum-security prisons in Germany for “incorrect thoughts”.

    If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the “chosen”) to engineer the jewish “holocaust”, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish “holocaust” was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state. In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many “holocausts” of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish “holocaust ™” is the only one that counts . . . It is interesting to note that the term “holocaust ™” to mean “mass extermination” was never used during or immediately after WW2, only coming to vogue in the 1960s, when it was noted that “guilt” could be assigned and reparations could be procured.

    Look at the “commercialization of the so-called jewish “holocaust ™” while the much larger communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten. To assure a continuing supply of jewish “holocaust ™” “survivors”, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean “camp” numbers) on their children and grandchildren. In addition, jewish psychologists have come up with a new concept, and “disease”–”holocaust ™ “transference syndrome”. You see, children and grandchildren of jewish “holocaust ™” survivors are infected with this “disease” and should also be considered “holocaust ™” survivors, eligible for “holocaust ™” reparations. According to these jewish psychiatrists, even unrelated individuals can be “infected” with this “malady”.

    Since the Zionist jews declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), the Germans had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least).. This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a “homeland”–Israel. It is interesting to note that the German boycott of jewish businesses lasted for one day, whil the jewish boycott (actually the jews’ declaration of war on Germany) started in 1933 and lasted until the summation of WW2.

    Zionists have been predicting a jewish “homeland” for the last two-hundred years while predicting a “holocaust ™” of 6 million for the same amount of time. The ACTUAL number of non-combatant deaths in the European theater of operations is approximately 731,000, NOT 6 million (official International Red Cross figures). The International Red Cross had full access to all of the camps for the duration of the war, yet reported NOT ONE INSTANCE of extermination or mass murder.

    Regarding that “holocaust ™” “showplace” Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called “gas chambers”. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called “gassing” took place”. There is a “gas chamber” chimney that is not connected to anything. From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the “operators” of these supposed “gas chambers”. As Germans were excellent engineers, it is difficult to observe the glaring engineering errors that presently exist in these “camps”.

    American execution expert, Fred Leuchter travelled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported “gas chambers”, had them tested and published his results. The absence of Prussian blue (ferricyanide) in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the “gas chambers” did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing. In fact, the “chimney” for the supposed “gas chamber” does not connect to anything.

    Mr. Leuchter’s was rewarded for his search for TRUTH by his professional and personal character assassination by those of the “tribe”. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts “law” for “practicing engineering without a license”–a law which had never been used vindictively before or since. . .After his report was published, he was harassed by Israeli “deep state” types (mossad) who he successfully “outed”.

    It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets attempted to “create” the “death camps” for propaganda purposes. Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering–many people perished. The prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

    It is interesting to note that, before the camps were “liberated” by the “allies”, the camp occupants chose to flee with the German troops, rather than be “liberated” by the Russian “allies”.

    It is said that “the light of day is the best disinfectant in the search for truth” Unfortunately this quote does not apply to “all things holocaust ™”. It appears that there are those “holocaust ™” promoters who are afraid of the TRUTH. Hence the prosecution and incarceration of those who dare question aspects of this historical event.

    I urge all “holocaust ™” believers to check these things out for yourselves–IF YOU DARE. You will not like what you find…

  86. For literature on the Holocaust in several languages go to AAARGH:

    http://aaargh.vho.org/index.html

    The works of Butz, Faurisson, Irving, etc. are available there for download.

    Below are some of the works that I have translated for AAARGH:

    Maurice Bardèche: Nuremberg or the Promised Land
    This is perhaps the first work of post-WWII revisionism.

    http://aaargh.vho.org/fran/livres7/BARDECHEnureng.pdf

    Serge Thion: A Brief History Of Revisionism

    http://aaargh.vho.org/fran/livres8/STBriefHist.pdf

    Pierre Guillaume: Law and History

    http://aaargh.vho.org/fran/livres7/PGLawhistory.pdf

    Georges Theil: Our Mission: Dismantle the Planetary Slander In Order to Help Build an Honest World

    http://aaargh.vho.org/fran/livres8/GTOurMission.pdf

  87. @EugeneGur

    ‘…The German conducted complete clearance on the Soviet territory, and most Soviet Jews never even made it to the concentration camps. This applied to the civil population as well as to the Russian Army. Every group of POW was sorted, with Jews and communists most often killed on the spot, and there are millions of testimonies to that.

    Obviously, the number is imprecise. Perhaps, the Nazis left good records in the concentrations camps, but in most mass massacres on the Soviet territory the exact numbers are unknown, and the estimates vary pretty widely…’

    Add too that many Jews must have run off into the forests and swamps and starved or frozen to death in the winter; in the accounts of the Holocaust in Christopher Browning’s ‘Ordinary Men’ there were enormous numbers of such Jews.

    Generally, they weren’t able to survive for long; the forests of Eastern Europe aren’t hospitable places in the winter. Browning even recounts instances of Jews coming out of the woods and giving themselves up for certain execution; it beat slowly starving and freezing to death.

    …but how many simply died and rotted in the forests? There’s no way of coming to more than a rough approximation.

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
  88. anarchyst says:

    The facts about the Nuremberg Show Trials:

    It was accepted at Nuremberg that Jews were steamed to death at Treblinka in gas chambers,
    see: ‘All Steamed up at Treblinka and superlatively accurate / The importance of the Steam Tales’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11684

    The official use of torture in extracting “confessions” from Germans has been confirmed repeatedly.

    - All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:” 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months..The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head, punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. Observer & American judge, van Roden

    - Judge van Roden’s allegation of torture to gain “confessions” is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    ” The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history.”
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in ‘The Wrexham Leader’, October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    “They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks,” recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation.”
    “We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance,” said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.

    -When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.
    and:
    - “The London Cage was used partly as a torture centre, inside which large numbers of German officers and soldiers were subjected to systematic ill-treatment. In total 3,573 men passed through the Cage, and more than 1,000 were persuaded to give statements about war crimes. The brutality did not end with the war, moreover: a number of German civilians joined the servicemen who were interrogated there up to 1948.
    more:
    -TORTURE: verifiable, acknowledged, damning. What Does It Mean for Revisionism?’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11697&p=87703

    and:
    - Nuremberg – Fair Trial or Show Trial ?’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11053

    • Replies: @red-ice
  89. Wally says:
    @Anon

    Very old news and repeatedly debunked here:

    The Speech of Heinrich Himmler: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1184
    exc.:

    - No human remains to back up the unfounded claims. Not a single enormous mass grave as alleged has ever been excavated, contents verified and shown. Not one. The storyline says 6M Jews & 5M others = 11M, now just think about that.
    How bizarre, claims of mass murder where there is no evidence to support it. The gas chambers are scientifically impossible as alleged and have been debunked ad nauseum by Revisionists, and the alleged 1,000,000 – 2,000,000 supposed mass shootings of thousands at a time in claimed known sites have produced no mass graves at those sites. Why is that?

    - In 1993, Robert Wolfe, supervisory archivist for captured German records at the National Archives admitted that a more precise translation of ‘ausrottung’ would be extirpation or tearing up by the roots. Wolfe also pointed out that in Himmler’s handwritten notes for the speech, that Himmler used the term, ‘judenevakuierung’, or evacuation of the Jews, not ‘extermination’.

    - There are missing pages, retyped pages by different hands, even pages have been re-numbered..

    - Then we have a so called “secret” speech in front of thousands. Frankly the assertions about it are laughable.

    - Yivo (Yiddish Scientific Institute) of New York was very active in the Rosenberg Ministry to process documents for submittal to the Nuremberg trials.

    - Members of the audience like SS-OGruF Gottlob Berger denied that Himmler was talking about the extermination of the Jews at all. I suggest reading: NMT, vol 13. p. 457-487

    - This alleged (recorded) speech, as German judge Staeglich has adroitly pointed out, is a hodgepodge of non-sequitors, nonsense, and re-worked text,see:
    ‘Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence, by Wilhelm Stäglich’: http://codoh.com/library/document/230

    - To have a speech with such alleged secret content recorded? Right. SS General Berger did not recognize Himmler’s voice listening to the tape.

    - the complete lack of orders for the desperate assumptions made about it.[/quote]more here:
    ‘Posen speech’: http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=372
    and here:
    Heinrich Himmler’s Posen Speech from 04.10.1943, , By Heinrich Himmler
    Published: 1943-10-04, Given at Posen 4 October 1943, Translation of Document No. 1919-PS, Nuremberg Trial, by Carlos Porter: http://codoh.com/library/document/891/

    http://www.codoh.com

  90. ‘…The German conducted complete clearance on the Soviet territory, and most Soviet Jews never even made it to the concentration camps. This applied to the civil population as well as to the Russian Army. Every group of POW was sorted, with Jews and communists most often killed on the spot, and there are millions of testimonies to that…’

    This actually raises another, statistically intractable problem.

    About three-quarters of all the Russian P.O.W.’s died — most in 1941, and most as a consequence of deliberate starvation. So do we count the Jewish ones as ‘Holocaust victims’ when they probably would have been deliberately murdered anyway simply by being virtue of Soviet P.O.W.’s?

    As I recall, the first group of victims gassed at Auschwitz were Russian P.O.W.’s. If one of them was Jewish, does he count as simply a dead P.O.W. or a ‘Holocaust victim’?

  91. “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” – Voltaire

    The fate of anyone who dares question the “Holocaust” proves Voltaire to be absolutely correct.
    Great article Ron !!

    • Replies: @unseated
  92. escobar says:

    Unz needs to learn German and read the documents left by the camp commanders and and guards, their testimony at the Frankfurt Auschwitz trials in the 1960s, the documents in Eastern Europe and interviews conducted there by historians like Timothy Snyder (who learned several languages spoken there)…but that would spoil his confessional. By the way, no serious historian has mentioned the “Six Million” figure for years, in Germany and the USA they’ve settled on 5.1 to 5.2 million. The fake memoirs and plagiarized accounts do not change what happened.
    Yeah, there is a “Holocaust Industry” and the Holocaust has been used and abused to make money and to excuse evil stuff done by Jews–from Wall Street to Tel Aviv. But the core of the Holocaust “narrative” stands. Expose and denounce those who did thew embellishing for fame or profit or Zionism, but claiming that the Holocaust is a “fake” or “myth” is noxious nonsense. But, stick with it and have fun making yourself look as foolish as the ninnies screaming about “white privilege” and “white supremacy” and white deviltry in general. Why not join the “dumb and dumber” parade? It’s all the rage now.

    • Troll: L.K
  93. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    said:
    ” Forty-fifty years before the Second World War, Jews had started retailing what turned out to be grossly exaggerated accounts of their sufferings in Russian pogroms.”

    “Grossly exaggerated” if at all. But that’s nothing compared to:

    Since at least 1823 Jews have been pushing their fake 6,000,000:

    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF

    and:
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

    http://www.codoh.com

  94. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    said:
    “No doubt the Germans were being beastly to the Jews — but actually killing them by the million? That elicited a collective raised eyebrow.”

    Really? Please present your proof of this ‘beastliness’

    The Germans did nothing that wasn’t being done by the Allies and others worldwide.

    http://www.codoh.com

  95. Wally says:
    @phil

    - Of course, when liars lies, they must then defend those lies with more lies.
    ‘O, what a tangled web they weave when first they practise to deceive’.

    Sobibor ‘monument’ supposedly over the remains of 250,000 Jew, actual remains of the alleged 250,000 cannot be shown.

    Alleged “ash pond” for 1,100,000 Jew remains at Auschwitz, no actual remains can be shown.

    Alleged location of Treblinka mass graves / remains of 900,000 Jews according to Treblinka officials, no alleged remains can be shown

    http://www.codoh.com

  96. @utu

    ‘…After Germany’s reunification this stopped and building of new narrative aiming at British-German reconciliation was started. German and British historians got very busy to drive the number of dead in Dresden from over 100,000 to below 25,000 in a futile attempt to achieve parity with Coventry (178 killed) that presumably was to justify the bombing of Dresden. You see, lowering the number of German victims is OK while any attempts to lower Jewish victim is a crime…’

    I see the motive as being to steal the thunder of the German far-right. No Dresden victim cult.

    It infuriates me on two scores. First, there’s the obvious mendacity. A comparison with the statistics for the Hamburg firestorm and a consideration of the various factors that would have tended to drive the death toll up for Dresden makes it clear that the older figure of 135,000 was probably about right to begin with, and in any case, 25,000 is absurdly low.

    Secondly, there’s the moral question. If it is an outrage to burn 135,000 people alive, how does it somehow become acceptable to burn ‘only’ 25,000 alive? It would seem that only those incinerated in the biggest bonfire get a victims’ halo.

    Germany could do with a victim cult. Collective guilt is a moral travesty to begin with — but in any case, the German people amply suffered in 1943-1948 for ‘their’ crimes. I’d hate to see the German people veer towards wanting ‘revenge,’ but there’s no need for them to feel guilt. To the extent that they can collectively be held responsible for anything, they paid, that’s for sure.

  97. @Anon

    It’s pretty well known that Eisenhower decided to film, take photos and make a visual record of the camps as soon as he saw them.

    Here’s some…

    German civilians visit the Buchenwald concentration camp in Weimar, Germany. HD Stock Footage

    Mentioned:
    Lampshade made of human skin.
    Pieces of skin used to draw art on.
    Two shrunken heads.
    Bad case of trench foot.
    Bodies appearing possibly to have died of typhus.

    Not mentioned:
    Gas chambers.
    Jews.

    First Newsreel Pictures Of The Liberation Of The Nazi Death Camps

    Not mentioned:
    Gas chambers.
    Jews.

  98. “Indeed, the fascinating and widely-praised 2002 book Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg notes that aside from Milch, Hitler’s military contained over a dozen half-Jewish generals and admirals and another dozen quarter-Jews of that same high rank, plus a total of roughly 150,000 additional half- or quarter-Jewish soldiers, with a large fraction of these being officers. All of these individuals would have had some fully-Jewish parents or grand-parents, which seems decidedly odd behavior for a regime supposedly so focused on the total eradication of the Jewish race.”

    If one considers the nature of Judaism- with it’s dispositions towards amorality, nihilism, subversion, the peculiarly fluid nature of Jewish ethnicity (seeing themselves as a distinct race, yet at same time throughout history showing themselves to have gone through periods of extensive mixing with surrounding populations, considering one to be Jewish if they have a Jewish mother even if this makes no real sense from a genetic perspective etc.), the fact many of the most dedicated anti-semites have often been Jewish (and Jews being neo-nazis or involved in the “far right” not being unheard of even today) etc., it might not be unsurprising a large number of mixed Jews were Nazis. After all, in your article “American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion”, you also noted that Nazism appears to have drawn inspiration from Judaism itself, and Nazism has long struck me as a rather schizophrenic ideology (like Judaism is a schizophrenic religion), as it’s adherents run the gamut of coming off as humanitarian in a sense with wanting self-determination for all people, to bonafide, foaming at the mouth white supremacists who want most or all other races exterminated.

    That this has not been explored of course raises unsavory questions about Judaism, hence why their massive role in Bolshevism and Communism has gone unremarked/ignored.

    “But just last year, I was stunned to discover that former total was simply a whole-cloth invention by prominent Holocaust-activist Simon Wiesenthal, who simply made the figure up one day with the intent of giving non-Jews more of a stake in the Holocaust story. And despite being based on absolutely no evidence or research, his casual claim was never effectively refuted by actual Holocaust scholars, who knew it to be total nonsense, and therefore it was so regularly repeated in the media that I probably read it hundreds of times over the years, always assuming it had some firm grounding in proven reality.”

    I don’t think Wiesenthal actually made those up, atleast that he didn’t actually fabricate a 5 million that wasn’t in pre-existing death tolls. What he seems to have done is come up with this 5 million figure on the basis of accepted deaths from non-Jews, mostly Soviet POW’s, but also Roma and other minorities, or he just came up with this 5 million figure and others used accepted deaths of non-jews as comprising these 5 million.

    The article nonetheless really does reveal Jewish attitudes about the centrality of Jewish suffering while claiming that’s not their intent, particularly this passage:

    ““I have been to many Yom Hashoah observances — including those sponsored by synagogues and Jewish communities — where eleven candles were lit,” she wrote in an article in the Jewish Review of Books in which she lacerated Wiesenthal’s ethical standards. “When I tell the organizers that they are engaged in historical revisionism, their reactions range from skepticism to outrage. Strangers have taken me to task in angry letters for focusing ‘only’ on Jewish deaths and ignoring the five million others. When I explain that this number is simply inaccurate, in fact made up, they become even more convinced of my ethnocentrism and inability to feel the pain of anyone but my own people.”

    The problem, according to Bauer, who has debunked the number repeatedly in his writings over the decades, is not that non-Jews were not victims; they were. It is that Wiesenthal’s arbitrarily chosen tally of non-Jewish victims diminishes the centrality to the Nazi ideology of systematically wiping any trace of the Jewish people from the planet.

    In fact, he said, the term “genocide” could accurately be applied to the 2 million to 3 million Poles murdered and millions more enslaved by the Nazis. But the mass murder of the Poles, Roma and others should not come under the rubric “Holocaust,” a term that Holocaust historians generally dislike because of its religious connotations but nonetheless have accepted as describing only the annihilation that the Nazis hoped to visit on the Jews.

    “All Jews of the world had to be annihilated,” Bauer said. “That was the intent. There was never an idea in Nazi minds to murder all the Russians.”

    The number 5 million also adheres to no known understanding of the number of non-Jews killed by the Nazis: While as many as 35 million people were killed overall because of Nazi aggression, the number of non-Jews who died in the concentration camps is no more than half a million, Bauer said.”

    It is widely accepted that Nazi Germany had broadly exterminationist policies targeted at many non-Jews (and were apparently interested in exterminating various non-Jewish groups altogether as well), and even if these were considered a “genocide”, the label “Holocaust” must not be applied to them because of the centrality of wiping out all Jews. This really doesn’t square with his denial of ethnocentrism. And it’s even more remarkable with the last passage, that “there was never an idea in Nazi minds to murder all the Russians”- really? Despite the immeasurable casualties on the eastern front the occurred in just a few years, the brutality Nazi Germany showed towards the Soviets and other Slavic nations, the fact many Nazis did indeed regard many Slavs as sub-human, and we still these attitudes today among various Neo-Nazis? Not one Nazi back then wanted to wipe out all Russians? Get out.

    “Some angry Internet activist has put together a graphic displaying extracts from dozens of New York Times stories between 1869 and 1941 all citing the figure of 6 million Eastern European Jews as being threatened with death, suggesting that our official Holocaust body-count actually predated World War II by as much as three generations. I really wouldn’t be surprised if that might be the original source of the number.”

    I’ve lost track of a specific cite on this, but the “angry Internet activist” should tell you something about the credibility of this. That span of 71 years concerning pending mass Jewish deaths related to various eastern european catastrophes should tell you something- “6 million” is not the only claimed figure. Those estimates of pending Jewish deaths encompassed a very wide ranged of figures claimed in the NYT over a period of many decades, and “6 million” was a minority of purported estimates. This is not a very good piece of evidence in favor of the “6 million” figure being fabricated.

    • Replies: @Unstremian
    , @Colin Wright
  99. phil says:
    @Anon

    Himmler (Posen): “I also want to mention a very difficult subject before you here, completely openly. It should be discussed amongst us, and yet, nevertheless, we will never speak about it in public. . . . I am talking about the “Jewish evacuation”: the [Ausrottung] of the Jewish people. It is one of those things that is easily said. “The Jewish people is being [ausgerottet],” every Party member will tell you, “perfectly clear, it’s part of our plans, we’re [ausschalten] the Jews, [ausrotten] them, ha!, a small matter.” . . . Most of you will know what it means when 100 bodies lie together, when there are 500, or when there are 1000. And to have seen this through, and — with the exception of human weaknesses — to have remained decent, has made us hard and is a page of glory never mentioned and never to be mentioned. . . . We have taken away the riches that they had, and I have given a strict order, which Obergruppenführer Pohl has carried out, we have delivered these riches completely to the Reich, to the State. We have taken nothing from them for ourselves. A few, who have offended against this, will be [judged] in accordance with an order, that I gave at the beginning: He who takes even one Mark of this is a dead man.”

    “Extermination” is an English word which can be interpreted figuratively or literally according to the context. The German referred to above can also be translated as “rooting out.” So translated, it is also consistent with a policy of mass deportations or “evacuations.” During WWII did the words and actions of Germans in some cases cross the line into the realm of murder that is not even justified in war? I think so, but there is a big difference between hundreds of thousands, or a million, and 6 million. More archaelogical work and archival (Russian) work would be desirable in this respect.

  100. @Anonymous

    I believe in the Holocaust, but I think the numbers were much much lower than stated.

    Those two statements are mutually exclusive. You are, de jure, guilty of Holocaust denial and your post may land you in prison if you ever visit Germany, since you voice doubt about the holy six million.

    And I’m not kidding either. Furthermore, you will have problems finding legal representation, since it is illegal for lawyers to argue substantially on the issue, because doing so will amount to compounding the Holocaust denial

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  101. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    said: “So we’re at 3.5 million as a minimum figure — I’d go with at least 5 million myself. ”
    Yet you have zero proof. Your engaging in garbage in, garbage out.

    Let us know where we can see the alleged human remains in allegedly known locations.

    On Irving, who BTW was released from prison early, hmm:
    Irving’s ‘holocaust’ lite / but what ’2.4 million document’?

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=4548

    and :
    ‘Irving attempts ‘rehabilitation’ via the Hoefle Telegram’

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=4558

    and:
    Grubach’s Open Letter to David Irving on his recent change of mind about the Holocaust

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4563

    on the Einsatzgruppen:
    Per their alleged ‘Holocaust by Bullets’ the ‘holocau$t’ Industry now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.
    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?

    http://www.codoh.com

  102. bookish1 says:

    a few simple but true facts can demolish that holocaust story forever: https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t553062/

  103. Wally says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    said:
    “Of course he did. Rebirth through ordeal & fire was the center of his world-view, Jews being considered to be something like pestilence, or rats who destroy high culture through their intrinsic & unalterable pervy rottenness. ”

    IOW, you have no proof for the ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and hope to distract.

    - Kruschev said “We will bury you.” Are we buried?

    - Ayatollah Khomeini called the US the “Great Satan” Are we in hell? LOL

    Netanyahu’s Racist Incitement, Dehumanizing non-Jews, Palestinians Designated as “Wild Beasts

    https://www.mondialisation.ca/netanyahus-racist-incitement-dehumanizing-non-israelis-palestinians-designated-as-wild-beasts/5508659

    Jews mock killing of pregnant Palestinians and children.

    and:
    Two teenage Israeli girls carrying a placard in Hebrew reading: “Hating Arabs is not racism, it’s values.”

    http://www.codoh.com

  104. Patricus says:

    Killing with gas chambers has been debunked pretty thoroughly. I think there were systematic persecutions and slaughters of Jews and others, usually shootings or hangings. It might not be six million, maybe two million?? and most deaths came by typhus or malnutrition just as German POWs died in American and Soviet camps. It was awful but just a fraction of the tens of millions slaughtered in that war. Let’s hope we don’t see more of these mass killings anytime soon.

  105. Greg Bacon says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    Since your browser is apparently broken, here’s one of many links on that subject. They might call it hate speech or in Germany, ” Incitement to hatred,” but it’s the same; deny the holocaust and risk fines and prison in 21 European nations and Russia.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_against_Holocaust_denial

    Some nations can hit you with up to 1o years for merely asking questions about the historical accuracy of the holocaust story or harass you endlessly, like they’ve do to Alison Chaboz in England–who got probation, fined and community service–or Monika Schaefer of Canada, who was arrested in Germany for Incitement to hatred back in January and has been sitting in a maximum security prison while awaiting trial, which finally started mid-July.

    She was visiting her brother in Germany when she got arrested for singing a song in Canada two years earlier and putting it on Youtube.

    This video is her crime, singing a song, “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust.” Although if you’re in Britain, you won’t be able to view it, as it has been blocked.

    Or the 88 yo German Ursula Haverbeck, who got hit with a two year sentence for denying the holocaust, about the same time some idiot German judge let a pack of young illegal aliens go free who had violently raped–nearly to death–a 14 yo girl. His reasoning was that they didn’t understand that NO meant NO and prison wouldn’t be good for them.

    Now if that ain’t a fugged up world, then we’re all mad.

    https://www.dw.com/en/nazi-grandma-loses-appeal-in-top-german-court-over-holocaust-denial-sentence/a-44944546

    What are they afraid of? Methinks the truth.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @kiismerhe
  106. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    said:
    “Of course the Holocaust happened. It’s tedious that there are so many who so monotonously insist otherwise.”

    Yet you still have produced no proof. You’re just reciting Zionist propaganda. We wonder why?

    It’s so “boring” yet we hear about it 24/7/365.

    Proof, Colin, why can’t you produce it?

    http://www.codoh.com

  107. macilrae says:

    Back in the 1970s I knew a gentleman of Polish origin, now long dead, who told me he spent five years as an inmate of Dachau concentration camp. He recounted that he was given a role there which included the supervision of those who were to be killed – many of whom were ethnic Polish intellectuals and activists like him but, also included, and specially mentioned for their bravery, were the Jehovah’s Witnesses who, he said, went to their deaths with a sort of “gleam” in their eyes. According to him, around ten percent of the inmates of Dachau were Jewish.

    He explicitly stated therefore that extermination took place – and apparently this is debatable in the case of Dachau – I assumed at the time he referred to ‘gassing’ yet I don’t recall him specifying this as the means – equally the victims could have been shot.

    I wish now that I could question him further but, alas, it’s too late.

  108. Sparkon says:

    This article is a courageous and comprehensive tour de force by Ron Unz.

    Bravo!

    For me, the bludgeon that smashed the Hollow Cost piñata was the authoritative Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948, which I had stumbled upon while looking under rocks in the aftermath of 9/11.

    In 1960, I was a student at a Catholic grade school, and I recall one day when the nun seemingly out of nowhere started talking about the Nazi program to gas all the Jews, which was the first I’d heard of it, although by then everyone knew the Nazis were evil, wicked, and mean, and don’t you forget it:


    Man’s Story, November 1962, illustration by Norman Saunders

    • Replies: @DFH
  109. Che Guava says:
    @Antiwar7

    Mea culpa for the error, I have never read Mother Night, only seen the film, on checking, film and book of it are very different.

    I am always trying to not make such errors, but bad assumption on my part. I read all of his novels of that time (never at the time), except that one.

    So thank you, and also to utu for the correction. Am feeling terrible for the error.

    • Replies: @Antiwar7
  110. annamaria says:
    @Colin Wright

    Two heavy gravestones upon the perfidious Holocaust biz
    1. “… the reality of the important Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s, with Nazi officials traveling to Palestine as honored Zionist guests and leading Nazi newspapers praising the Zionist enterprise…
    … aside from Field Marshal Erhard Milch, Hermann Goering’s very powerful number-two in the German Luftwaffe, Hitler’s military contained over a dozen half-Jewish generals and admirals and another dozen quarter-Jews of that same high rank, plus a total of roughly 150,000 additional half- or quarter-Jewish soldiers, with a large fraction of these being officers…”
    2. “…the death toll of innocent civilians from the Bolshevik Revolution running well into the tens of millions … the Bolshevik leaders were overwhelmingly Jewish…Although only around 4% of Russia’s population was Jewish, Jews constituted perhaps 80-85% of the early Soviet government…
    And prior to World War II, Jews remained enormously over-represented in the Communist leadership, especially dominating the Gulag [a system of the murderous concentration camps] administration and the top ranks of the dreaded NKVD…
    …the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close.”

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  111. sarz says:

    It’s a real relief to see you using the phrase “Holocaust denial” rather than the weasly “Holocaust revisionism. I wish people like Gilad Atzmon would follow your lead. He says the best we can do is revise away, and so, since nothing is final, he can never ever say the Holocaust story is a crock of shit — just that he’s revising away. He calls it being in time, and that’s better than Heidegger (that old Nazi). Then there’s people like Israel Shamir, who’s on record that his guru on the Holocaust is Raoul Hilberg, and he’s one of your own stable of authors. And there’s the very Norman Finkelstein you respectfully mention, who gets a few shekels more from being the son of Auschwitz survivors and never, as it happens, denies the Holocaust, just denounces the racket.

    And these are truth-telling Jews, supposedly, as unnatural as a dog walking on its hind legs. So where the hell did you come from? If it’s something in the water somewhere, let’s bottle it.

  112. @Unstremian

    I also forgot to mention this part:

    “The number 5 million also adheres to no known understanding of the number of non-Jews killed by the Nazis: While as many as 35 million people were killed overall because of Nazi aggression, the number of non-Jews who died in the concentration camps is no more than half a million, Bauer said.””

    “No known understanding”, yet then goes on to admit half a million non-Jews died in concentration camps. And that’s still a lot of people. I have also again seen the “5 million” claimed to be comprise primarily of Soviet POW’s (who often died in prison camps) and many other non-Jews- Roma, homosexuals, political prisoners, various other ethnic and religious minorities etc. are the most often mentioned. There is “known understanding” of how all those people were killed, and Bauer admits to some of it. Besides, I don’t think any serious “Holocaust Scholar” or other historian who believes the standard figure and narrative would say every single Jew was killed in a concentration camp. So why fixate solely on concentration camp deaths?

    Bauer remarks on how his denial of the 5 million non-Jews dying in the Holocaust is often met with people being “more convinced of my ethnocentrism and inability to feel the pain of anyone but my own people.” And he exhibits exactly that in this article. Typical.

  113. Damn! Ron. Unz. Is. My. Hero.

    Meanwhile, the Jewish community also seems to contain far more than its fair share of the emotionally disturbed and the mentally ill, and perhaps as a consequence has served as a launching-pad for many of the world’s religious cults and fanatic ideological movements. Any exploration of the Holocaust certainly tends to support this rather negative appraisal.

    If I’m not mistaken, I believe it was Sigmund Freud himself who once speculated that Abraham had been a schizophrenic hearing the ‘voice of God’ telling him to smash the pagan idols in the temple of Ur. If so, then Judaism was founded by an insane man. This same Abraham, by the way, later again heard the ‘voice of God’ commanding him to sacrifice his only son, Isaac. What a nutbag!

    I recall several other columns from the mid-2000s dancing around Holocaust issues, but I now seem unable to locate them within the Counterpunch archives.

    I doubt you ever will , since CounterPurge has now been take over by a (((gang of four))) intent on getting rid of any of Cockburn’s excellent legacy. Very sad what happened to that once fine publication. But at least we now have Unz.com, which is even better.

    Thank you for your honesty, courage, and volume-reading, Ron. It means a lot … more than you know.

    • Replies: @Hans
  114. Ron Unz says:
    @academic gossip

    That is, [according to Churchill] dead Hungarian Jews in the German camps have fallen to “scientific machinery” used by “nominally civilized men in the name of a great State”

    Well, it all sounds kind of vague to me. Maybe he was referring to the report mentioned by Lipstadt that 1.5 million Jews had been killed by being individually injected near the heart by a lethal drug, which certainly requires science. And Rabbi Stephen Wise was claiming that millions of Jews had been killed and made into soap and human lampshades, which obviously also requires “scientific machinery.” Weren’t shrunken human heads exhibited at the Nuremberg Trials? And wasn’t there also some claim floating around that vast numbers of Jews had been killed by electrified floors or something like that?

  115. Even as late as 2009 an official at Israel’s Jewish Agency justified laws criminalizing Holocaust Denial by explaining that almost 65 years after the end of the war “there are still hundreds of thousands of living Holocaust survivors”

    2018 update:

    By the year 2035 [!], there will only be about 26,200 Holocaust survivors living in the country [Israel], according to a report the Central Bureau of Statistics released ahead of International Holocaust Remembrance Day on January 27.

    The researchers said that according to forecasts, in 2020 there will be some 142,000 survivors living in Israel and by 2025 this number will have decreased to 92,600 survivors.

    At the end of 2016, there were an estimated 186,500 Holocaust survivors living in Israel, the report said. This compared to 202,600 survivors at the end of 2015.

    Note, however, that the definition of “Holocaust survivor” is a very broad one: “A Holocaust survivor is a person who lived in one of the countries occupied by or under the direct influence of the Nazi regime between 1933 and 1945, and/or refugees who were forced to leave their homes due to the Nazi regime”.

    Hence the breakdown of the current total of 186,500:

    about 57,500 are survivors from the ghettos, hideouts, labor camps and concentration camps, with 77% of the survivors originating in European countries, a plurality – 32% – from Romania. . .

    An additional 101,000 lived in countries under Nazi rule, of whom 55% were born in North Africa, primarily Morocco, Tunisia and Libya, and some 28,100 were refugees, of whom 76% were born in the Soviet Union, the report found.

    https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Only-26200-Holocaust-survivors-will-be-living-in-Israel-by-2035-539668

  116. Ron Unz says:
    @GaiusOptimus

    “…Surely no zealous theologian of the European Dark Ages would have reacted any differently…”

    You nailed me! Actually, when I write my long articles I normally go through several drafts, changing a few words here and there, and an earlier version read “no zealous mid-level theologian,” but I decide the excise the extra adjective, which perhaps I shouldn’t have done…

  117. anarchyst says:
    @Anon

    Not only was the “diary” ghost-written by Otto Frank, most of it was written with a “ball-point pen”, not invented until well after WW2.
    The Frank’s were rounded up and arrested because of their black-market activities–nothing more…

    • Replies: @Anon
  118. conatus says:
    @brander

    Yeah, he writes funny pieces over at Taki…a funny guy, really. In the Republican Party Animal book he discusses death totals in the last chapter. He says 3 to 3.5 mil, mostly by the Einsatzgruppen.

  119. Wally says:
    @EugeneGur

    said:
    “Yes, some Jews were evacuated ahead of the advancing German troops, some ran away on their own knowing what was in store for them – what does it prove? The remaining ones, however, were exterminated. For example, in Crimea alone about half of the pre-War Jews escaped before the German occupation, but the remaining half was killed – almost all of them – approximately 40,000. The German conducted complete clearance on the Soviet territory, and most Soviet Jews never even made it to the concentration camps. This applied to the civil population as well as to the Russian Army. Every group of POW was sorted, with Jews and communists most often killed on the spot, and there are millions of testimonies to that. ”

    - No they didn’t, that’s pure nonsense. It’s really a simple matter. You have absolutely no proof that they were “exterminated”. If you did you would present it here.

    - What “millions of testimonies”? Give us some. Specifics, not unfounded, bizarre Zionist propaganda.
    Who exactly said what …. specifically? Tell us what courts they ‘testified’ in and show us the verbatim transcripts & cross examination records of what they supposedly said.

    The Germans supposedly ‘tried to kill every Jew they could get there hands on’, yet there are currently ca. 1,000,000 ‘holocaust survivors’

    It’s claimed that there are immense Jew remains in allegedly known place. Please show us those claimed remains.

    Confession & Testimonies on Auschwitz, 40 ‘Gas Chamber Witnesses’Scrutinized

    available in German, https://shop.codoh.com/book/480/494
    English edition soon

    http://www.codoh.com

  120. @Unstremian

    ‘…The problem, according to Bauer, who has debunked the number repeatedly in his writings over the decades, is not that non-Jews were not victims; they were. It is that Wiesenthal’s arbitrarily chosen tally of non-Jewish victims diminishes the centrality to the Nazi ideology of systematically wiping any trace of the Jewish people from the planet…’

    It’s also almost comically obvious that the number ‘five million’ was chosen because it’s slightly less than ‘six million’ — there were other victims, but Jews were the biggest victims.

    Let’s leave aside the moral absurdity of being the ‘biggest’ victim. First off, perfectly respectable figures have plumped for figures other than six million for the number of Jews killed; didn’t Raul Hilberg settle on 5.1 million? Secondly, the number of gentiles killed is almost completely a matter of definition. Figures from German anti-partisan sweeps make it painfully clear many, many outright civilians were killed in them — just how many can never be known. Do we count Serbians caught in partisan zones? Russian POW’s who starved to death? Soldiers simply killed in combat? Only those taken to a camp and gassed? Have five million, have two million, have twenty million — have almost any number you like. Just adjust your definition to get what you want.

    The ‘Five million/six million’ figures are a contemptible bit of rhetorical legerdemain. ‘You were victims too — but we’re number one.’ For what it’s worth, in absolute numbers, Jews obviously didn’t get to be the Everest of corpse mountains. That dubious honor would go either to Chinese civilians or to the Soviet soldier — although here Hitler would have to share hangman’s honors with Stalin, who did at least as much to get so many killed as Hitler did.

    • Replies: @EugeneGur
    , @Unstremian
  121. Ron Unz says:

    Thanks to everyone who had kind words for my long article…or even bothered reading through the whole thing!

    Once again, I’d like to very forcefully reemphasize that I’m *absolutely* no sort of expert on the Holocaust. I’d never really had any serious suspicions until I read Cockburn’s columns about Hitchens beliefs a dozen years ago, and only decided to seriously investigate the topic in the mid-2010s. Furthermore, I really doubt I’ve spent more than just a few weeks total in reading and researching the complex subject. So how could my knowledge possibly compare with that of so many others on both sides, who’d devoted their entire professional lives to the issue?

    When I looked into the Holocaust, I read some of the most prominent Holocaust Denial books and a considerably larger number of debunkers on the other side. As near as I could tell, the most visible writers in that latter camp were Lipstadt and Shermer, and I was very unimpressed with their quality, which certainly impacted my opinion.

    For those interested in spending a little time on the topic, I’d recommend just listening to the two hour YouTube radio interview of Nicholas Kollerstrom that I linked above.

    He came across as being quite credible to me. For those who agree, I’d recommend buying his short book, that can be read in just a long afternoon. Among other things, he seems to persuasively estimate that the total Jewish deaths at Auschwitz were something like 99% lower than the traditional figure. Maybe he’s just a lunatic—who knows? But if you find him credible, I think that would tend to support my strong suspicion that the conventional narrative of the Holocaust is at least “substantially false.”

  122. Wally says:
    @Anonymous

    Why do you “believe”? You have no proof.

    You sound like a believing religious fanatic, a True Believer. Really nutty stuff.

    http://www.codoh.com

    To believe in the ‘holocaust’ one must want or need to believe in it.

  123. Wally says:
    @utu

    A wiki entry? LOL

    Seriously? Laughable Zionist controlled Wikipedia?
    It’s amazing why anyone would cite Wikipedia as a reference for anything which Jews have a special interest in promoting. It’s rather like asking the wolf to guard the chicken coop.

    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet

    http://www.unz.com/article/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/?highlight=wikipedia

    http://www.codoh.com

  124. utu says:

    Before the WWII over 3 million Jews lived in Poland. It is believed that approx. 85% of them were ultra Orthodox and Hasidic. After the WWII approx. 300,000 Polish Jews were found alive in Poland. But there were not many ultra-Orthodox and Hasidic Jews among them. The ones who survived were the assimilated ones, Bundists, Zionists and Communist. The deeply religious Jews did not show up in Poland after the WWII. They did not become ardent Zionist and hid in Israel. Hasidic Jews did not join Komsomol or Communist party while in the USSR and hid in the Workers’ Paradise. They can’t be accounted as DPs in Germany. They did not show up in America or Argentina or Brazil. They were gone. If the Holocaust revisionism is to be taken seriously it must come up with the story for the vanished religious Jews of Poland. But it can’t present a credible story of survival because these Jews indeed died during the WWII while in a custody of German occupying forces. Claiming that they did not die is exactly what Holocaust industry wants. The extreme Holocaust denialism serves Zionist interests. Codoh and Wally’s of this world are agent of Zionist interests as unwitting useful idiots at best. The questions why did the religious Jews die and that nobody wanted to hear about their death during the WWII is a much bigger story. The revisionists should consider looking into the stories that are being told by Neuterei Karta and Satmar Hassidic Jews. What Eichmann could have told us if he was not executed in Israel? Why the Holocaust narrative was downplayed before his death? This is a crime mystery where we want to find all the culprits and their motives while the Holocaust deniers want us to believe there was no crime, no victim and thus there was no culprit.

  125. @annamaria

    ‘Two heavy gravestones upon the perfidious Holocaust biz…’

    You need to learn to think with greater precision. Even when true, most of your cited facts do nothing to disprove the reality of the Holocaust or even make it less probable. How does the fact that many of the Bolshevik leaders were Jewish demonstrate that the Holocaust didn’t happen?

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Anon
  126. @Ron Unz

    Unz, what is the best way to contact you directly?

  127. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “Slave labor”? You mean the same “slave labor” that the Allies used?

    Jews were not “worked and starved to death.” there no proof.

    Using your logic, why would German starve to death their valuable “slave labor”?

    http://www.codoh.com

    Healthy Jews at Auschwitz ‘liberation’:http://fcit.coedu.usf.edu/holocaust/PICS31/66935a.jpg

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @cassandra
  128. @Ron Unz

    ‘…He came across as being quite credible to me. For those who agree, I’d recommend buying his short book, that can be read in just a long afternoon. Among other things, he seems to persuasively estimate that the total Jewish deaths at Auschwitz were something like 99% lower than the traditional figure…’

    I think it may well be true that Auschwitz’s prominence in the Holocaust has been exaggerated.

    There are two reasons for this. First, the Poles and Soviets started out by claiming four million had been exterminated there — and although that figure’s long since been abandoned, we’re still stuck with the paradigm of Auschwitz as extermination camp no. 1.

    Secondly, Auschwitz exists. You can go see it. Want to go see Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor? They’re level fields. There’s nothing there. So Auschwitz continues to be where you go to pay your respects, so to speak. As with the MIA/POW controversy, it’d be awkward to change the story at this point. There needs to be a shrine. Auschwitz is it. ‘Don’t talk shit about Auschwitz!’

    However, and this is important, it doesn’t follow from this that the Holocaust didn’t occur. It — or at least most of it — just happened someplace other than at Auschwitz. That’s all.

    • Replies: @Hamlet's Ghost
    , @Wally
  129. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    On the “extermination camp”, “slave labor camp” Auschwitz”:

    An “extermination camp” where thousands of Jews chose to stay behind when the Germans left.

    An “extermination camp” where most of the inmates, more thousands, chose to leave WITH the Germans.

    An “extermination camp” where 1,250,000 human remains are supposedly buried, but no one can show us these remains.

    An “extermination camp” where many Jews gave birth.

    An “extermination camp” where the absurdly alleged homicidal ‘gas chambers’ could not have worked as alleged, as proven repeatedly, scientifically impossible.

    An “extermination camp” where fake ‘gas chambers’ were “reconstructed” AFTER THE WAR.

    An “extermination camp” where detailed aerial photos of the period show nothing that is alleged to have been happening.

    An “extermination camp” where there are even obvious, laughable attempts to tamper with aerial photos that make a mockery of the fake storyline.
    see:
    Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11669

    An “extermination camp” where there are countless Jew “survivors”.

    An “extermination camp” where so called “survivors” say the most impossible and conflicting things that do not hold up to scrutiny, would be laughed out of a legit court of law.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Anon
  130. EugeneGur says:
    @Colin Wright

    So do we count the Jewish ones as ‘Holocaust victims’ when they probably would have been deliberately murdered anyway simply by being virtue of Soviet P.O.W.’s?

    You right that presenting the Jewish Holocaust as something uniques is incorrect. The Jews were the first group destined for extermination but so were the Russians and other nations of the Soviet Union. It is estimated that approximately 3 millions of Soviet POWs of all nationalities perished in the Nazi captivity. The number is quite comparable to the Holocaust estimate but it is politically incorrect, so it’s hardly ever mentioned in the West.

    Most of those Soviet POW who dies in captivity weren’t Jewish. As I said, most Soviet Jewish soldiers didn’t make it to the camps unless they manages somehow to hide their Jewish identity. Some did, because many Soviet Jews were of mixed blood and did not have an obviously Jewish appearance. So, they could conceal their nationality unless someone betrayed them.

  131. Wally says:
    @Anon

    The fake Anne Frank diary utterly exposed below.

    You’ll love seeing the many different handwritings.

    Anne Frank’s Diary Gains ‘Co-Author’ / and much, much more: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9924

    That’s the same Anne Frank that was transferred out of the alleged “pure extermination camp” Auschwitz to get medical treatment.

    http://www.codoh.com

  132. @utu

    ‘Before the WWII over 3 million Jews lived in Poland. It is believed that approx. 85% of them were ultra Orthodox and Hasidic…’

    This is a constructive line of inquiry. I’m not sure I’m going to agree with wherever you’re going to go with it, but I’m curious to hear more.

    …and indeed and at a minimum, secular Jews would be more capable of blending in with the gentile population and/or finding gentile friends to shelter them and help them out. The religious Jews would have been visibly alien, and exactly what the Nazis had in mind when they were looking for their appointed victims.

    See also Hitler’s Mein Kampf. He mentions that he had met assimilated Jews, and while he professed to regard them with some distaste, he felt no great antagonism. It was the Ostjuden — I assume religious Jews from Galicia et al — who filled him with revulsion and horror.

    As so often, the whole field could do with some exact and disciplined inquiry. I’ve little patience with outright Holocaust Denial, but stuff such as Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners is almost equally useless.

    • Replies: @J. Masterson
  133. @Colin Wright

    Add too that many Jews must have run off into the forests and swamps

    Partisans?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Colin Wright
  134. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    So why haven’t you found your answers from the “Holocaust Industry”?

    All those questions have been easily answered at: http://www.codoh.com
    use the search function

    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com
    use the search function

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the ‘holocaust’ storyline is the message.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  135. syonredux says:
    @dearieme

    one explanation immediately suggests itself. (Whether it is anywhere near the mark I have no idea.)

    Perhaps many Germans were not much worried about assimilated German Jews, especially if they were seen as valuable to the military and if unconnected to Bolshevism. Perhaps German hatred was directed mainly at East European Jews.

    I think that there is something to that notion. German Jews were commonly seen as superior to the Ostjuden . You can see something of this attitude in a letter* written by GeneralKommissar for Belorussia Wilhem Kube concerning the treatment of German Jews:

    I wish to ask you personally for an official directive for the conduct of the civilian administration toward the Jews deported from Germany to Belorussia. Among these Jews are men who fought at the front [during World War I] and have the Iron Cross, First and Second Class, war invalids, half-Aryans, even three-quarter Aryans.

    Up to now only 6,000 to 7,000 Jews have arrived, of the 25,000 who were expected. I am not aware what has become of the others. In the course of several official visits to the ghetto I noted that among these Jews, who differ from the Russian Jews in their personal cleanliness, there are also skilled workers capable of doing five times as much in a day as Russian Jews.

    On my own responsibility I will not give the SD any instructions with regard to the treatment of these people, although certain units of the Wehrmacht and the police already have an eye on the possessions of the Jews from the Reich, and has also confiscated various other things. I am certainly a hard [man] and willing to help solve the Jewish question, but people people who come from our own cultural sphere just are not the same as the brutish hordes in this place. Is the slaughter to be carried out by the Lithuanians and Letts, who are themselves rejected by the population here? I couldn’t do it. I beg you to give clear directives [in this matter], with due consideration for the good name of our Reich and our Party, in order that the necessary action can be taken in the most humane manner.

    http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/german/einsatzgruppen/esg/trials/profiles/kubeletter.html

    *Yes, Ron, I know that you hate it when I quote anything……

    • Replies: @Wally
  136. @Anon

    And in the process documented many hundreds of deaths from various causes. Often it was ugly stuff, too, but there had been this thing called a war going on, you see.

    I believe it’s fair to conclude from all available evidence that many thousands of Jews died during the war, with typhus being a leading cause. It’s only fitting that we focus exclusively on Jewish deaths, as opposed to the millions of others. Though I’m not quite sure why. The “why” might tell us something about our own society, and our own time.

  137. @for-the-record

    ‘…about 57,500 are survivors from the ghettos, hideouts, labor camps and concentration camps, with 77% of the survivors originating in European countries, a plurality – 32% – from Romania. . .

    An additional 101,000 lived in countries under Nazi rule, of whom 55% were born in North Africa, primarily Morocco, Tunisia and Libya, and some 28,100 were refugees, of whom 76% were born in the Soviet Union, the report found…’

    ! But few of these would be ‘Holocaust survivors’ in any meaningful sense. Most of the 55% born in North Africa merely experienced the temporary loss of their privileged status as French Citizens for two years, while my impression is that while the Romanians engaged in genocidal behavior in the recovered territories of Bessarabia et al, Jews in Romania proper were merely subjected to the usual regime of mildly anti-semitic discrimination. Moreover, inasmuch as Romania never fell under German occupation, unlike Hungary, there’s no reason to think this changed. Finally, the Soviet refugees didn’t necessarily suffer anything that the average Russian didn’t suffer, and so aren’t ‘Holocaust survivors’ in any meaningful sense at all.

    Add that the 186,000 figure would seem to include the many German Jews who got out in good time after losing their business and perhaps getting beaten up by a stormtrooper, and we’ve got a very questionable pool of ‘Holocaust survivors.’ Some of these people would be no more victims than some American white who decided it would be a good idea to move to suburbia in 1972 after a few distressing experiences.

    …which suggests something. Can we demand reparations too?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Nog
  138. @Colin Wright

    ‘Holocaust survivor’ conjures up images of someone who managed to survive the Warsaw ghetto, or looked into the ovens of Auschwitz.

    As the figures make clear, there were very few of those. Ironically, the very reality of the Holocaust implies that there weren’t many genuine ‘Holocaust survivors’ to begin with, and now, after seventy three years, they must be genuinely few and far between.

    • Replies: @Wally
  139. bucky says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I don’t disagree. the treatment of Jews in Germany is similar to what Trump is doing to Mexicans now. There is this general attitude of disdain towards a certain class of people that emanates from the leadership. those lower down continually push the envelope as to cruel behavior towards the targeted group.

    Mexicans are alleged to be undercutting American labor, just like Jews were accused of destabilizing governments and societies. Increasingly cruel behaviors were enacted on them. We have the family separations on the border going on with Mexicans, and there are even stories of ICE officers unleashing pedophilic tendencies upon Mexican children. This isn’t a result of a master plan handed down by aliens. It is a result of leadership.

    Also, prison populations are used for many heavy labor activities. Many inmates are tasked with firefighting. They are the lowest population in America, are heavily minority, and while there is significant truth to the allegations made against them, their ill treatment comes from a collective attitude of disdain.

    • LOL: JMcG
    • Troll: utu, Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @Anon
  140. One thing, among propaganda left & right, seems to be neglected: sheer number of prominent Jews (or people of Jewish extraction) who perished during WWII. If we can say, with certainty that:

    1. great mathematician Felix Hausdorff was a victim of “racial” persecution: http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Hausdorff.html

    Bonn University requested that the Hausdorffs be allowed to remain in their home and this was granted. By October 1941 they were forced to wear the “yellow star” and around the end of the year they were informed that they would be sent to Cologne. Bessel-Hagen wrote that he knew this was (see [24] and [6]):-

    … a preliminary to deportation to Poland. And what one hears concerning the accommodation and treatment of Jews there is completely unimaginable.

    They were not sent to Cologne but in January 1942 they were informed that they were to be interned in Endenich. Together with his wife and his wife’s sister, he committed suicide on 26 January. He wrote to a friend on Sunday 25 January (see [24] and [6]):-

    Dear Friend Wollstein
    By the time you receive these lines, we three will have solved the problem in another way – in the way which you have continually attempted to dissuade us. …
    What has been done against the Jews in recent months arouses well-founded anxiety that we will no longer be allowed to experience a bearable situation. …
    Forgive us, that we still cause you trouble beyond death; I am convinced that you will do what you are able to do (and which perhaps is not very much). Forgive us also our desertion! We wish you and all our friends will experience better times
    Yours faithfully
    Felix Hausdorff

    On the night of Sunday 25 January all three took barbiturates. Both Hausdorff and his wife Charlotte were dead by the morning of the 26 January. Edith, Charlotte’s sister, survived for a few days in a coma before dying.

    2. Chekhov’s fiance Dunya Efros was gassed in Nazi CC, after being handed over by Vichy government. She was in her 80s. See, for instance, Rayfiled’s celebrated bio: http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=490A9DAACAF1878F0798ACB15CA67D4D

    3. Kafka’s sisters all perished.

    https://www.butterfliesintheghetto.com/?tag=franz-kafkas-family

    Another fact that is seldom mentioned about Franz Kafka is that his closest sister ended up in Terezin. Franz’s three younger siblings, his sisters Ellie, Valli, and Ottilie all died in the Holocaust.

    4.Freud’s sisters

    http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/ghettos/freud.html

    Freud’s Sisters and the Holocaust

    Freud’s sisters

    Three of Freud’s sisters Marie, Pauline Winternitz, and Rosa Graf-Freud were deported to Treblinka, on Transport Number BQ on the 23 September 1942 and murdered, in the gas chambers.

    An eyewitness has recorded that one of Freud’s sisters, possibly Rosa, approached SS- Untersturmfuhrer Kurt Franz on the ramp and asked “to be given lighter walk on account of her poor health.”

    Franz “assured her that her arrival in Treblinka was a mistake, in view of her poor health and that as soon as she had had her bath, she would be put on the first available train back to Vienna. “

    Freud lost another sister Adolfine who was born in 1862 in Vienna. Deported to Theresienstadt she died on the 5 February 1943 from internal haemorrhaging.

    So-if those “famous” (or relatives & acquaintances of the “famous”..) simply vanished into the night, and we know about them- what about vastly numerous “others” ?

    I am against all brainwashing & taboos, but hard-core holo-deniers, whichever their motives, seem to me a bunch of lunatics not worthy to be bothered about.

  141. Wally says:
    @utu

    Yawn, the old ‘where did they go’ canard by faker utu*.

    Jews & their “Holocaust Industry” say that ’6M Jews & 5M others’ went to huge mass graves, they claim to know the exact locations of these alleged enormous mass graves, yet they cannot show us the alleged massive human remains. Hapless utu cannot show us either. LOL

    recommended:
    See here, some links about Jews being moved around, & much more.:
    ‘J. Graf and the illogical canard: ‘Where did Jews go then?’ / & more’
    viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8272

    Postwar locations of Jews? Child’s play:
    “That shitty little country” Israel, US, S. America, Australia, wherever Jews are.

    After the war, many Jews stayed in Europe and many others scattered throughout the world, settling in nearly sixty countries. So it was that in the late 1990s the teams put in charge by Steven Spielberg of gathering survivors’ testimonies had to go to nearly SIXTY different countries to record the said “testimonies” on video.

    https://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2009/03/alleged-holocaust-of-jews-is-proving.html

    * See the bizarre unhinged shill utu slapped own on his laughable ‘gas chambers’ claim: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-post-war-france-and-post-war-germany/ comment 429

    http://www.codoh.com

  142. @Che Guava

    It is worth noting that Schindler’s List is classified as fiction.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  143. @Bucky

    No one denies that a substantial number of Jews were killed in WW2 (along with many, many more non Jews) or that Hitler and the National Socialists singled out Jews for mistreatment (whether justified or not is an entirely different topic).

    But the real issue is the fact that so much of what we’ve been told about the holocaust is obviously lies and exaggeration and that Jews and Israel have both profited handsomely from these lies and exaggerations.

    This would be like me setting up a GoFundMe for my cancer treatment and then telling you that actually I just have the flu…….but I’m still sick so I should be able to keep the money.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @bucky
    , @Wally
    , @Amber Dekstris
  144. EugeneGur says:
    @Colin Wright

    although here Hitler would have to share hangman’s honors with Stalin, who did at least as much to get so many killed as Hitler did.

    Actually, he didn’t – Stalin, I mean. Stalin was just an apprentice by comparison. According to the latest research, the number of people executed from 1924 to 1953 is slightly above 800,000. The whole number gone through the Gulag system is about 4 millions – and this number includes criminals, collaborators, traitors, not just political prisoners.

    This number was first reported to Khrushchev by the Chief of KGB in 1953. This means that Khrushchev knew the real situation full well when he put out a lie about “12 million executed” to defeat his political opponents.

    The 800,000 is a number well supported by the documents as well as numerous testimonies. Also, the “Memorial” society has been trying for more than a quarter of a century to list every prisoner of Gulag by name, but their list never exceeded 2 millions. Again, the numbers are politically incorrect, so the Western sources keep pretending they doesn’t exist.

    As you see, Hitler did a better job and did it a lot faster, too.

    • Agree: Cyrano
    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Colin Wright
  145. anarchyst says:
    @for-the-record

    The latest jewish “holocaust ™” swindle is that of the “holocaust ™ transference syndrome” where (only) jewish “holocaust™ memories are transferred to their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and even to unrelated persons. This claim by two jewish psychiatrists is gaining traction among jewish “holocaust ™” promoters in order to “keep the dream alive” and to “keep the reparations and shekels flowing”. You see, these children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and other unrelated individuals are also seen as jewish “holocaust ™” survivors, worthy of reparations and special treatment.
    When will it end?
    NEVER…

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  146. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    Nope, there are claims of upward to 1,000,000 “survivor$”.
    Many claimed to have ‘witnessed’ the impossible gas chambers’.

    Former inmate, Moshe Peer, recalled a miraculous escape from death as an eleven-year-old in the camp. In a 1993 interview with a Canadian newspaper, the French-born Peer claimed that he “was sent to the camp gas chamber at least six times…maybe children resist better, I don’t know.

    - Gazette, Montreal, Canada, August 5, 1993

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  147. bucky says:

    I think you’re going at it all wrong.

    As Greg Johnson has put it, the lesson to be gleaned from the Holocaust is that forced multiculturalism leads to strife which on the extreme end results in atrocities like the Holocaust, and WWII in general, which did ultimately lead to a genocide of ethnic Germans, a tarnishing of the German culture, and a divided country for fifty years. This was their own agency, not anyone else’s.

    The way towards peace is to recognize group differences which exist in people, and live and let live. Good fences make good neighbors Let people make their own choices as to who to associate with, who to do business with. You can’t ever “eliminate racism” rather the goal of a ruler should be to not inflame racism by enacting policies which will lead to backlash.

    • Replies: @Wally
  148. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    Thank you very much for all these great articles you have written over the last several months (and before) and your comprehensive research into all these diverse and controversial subject matters, Mr. Unz.

    I read the entire article right way last night after I saw it published. You have an incredible and rare talent to write about complex topics in great detail and at the same time keep your writing flowing and easily comprehensible.

    I’m very glad and grateful that you are dedicating more of your time and talent to writing again.

    P.s.: The formatting of the Unz Review Video homepage is off again, i.e., the side menu is moved to the bottom of the page: http://www.unz.com/video/

    P.p.s.: We had a very detailed discussion on the Holocaust, etc. in the following Unz Review comments threads for any readers and commenters who have not yet made up their mind on the Holocaust, Hitler, etc. and might be interested to get more information:

    Auschwitz: The Dwindling Death Toll

    510.000 persons according to Fritjof Meyer (2002), of whom 356.000 were gassed Jews.[35] – http://vho.org/tr/2003/1/Faurisson17-23.html Archived link: http://archive.is/huN3E

    Various numbers of victims of the Auschwitz concentration camp as claimed by official authorities and historians:
    Second column from the right: the lowest estimate so far by Fritjof Meyer. Right-most column: maximum figure according to revisionist opinion (ca. 150,000). You have the free choice! At most one of these figures can be correct, but all the rest may potentially incite to hatred, and uttering them can lead to criminal prosecution in many European countries. But most importantly, it is considered highly offensive, if not outright illegal in those countries to make such compilations in the first place![40]
    https://www.unz.com/article/against-david-irvings-view-of-hitler/#comment-2391562

    The Wrong Family Holocaust Story: Survival of Polish Jews in Stalin’s Russia

    Source: https://www.unz.com/article/against-david-irvings-view-of-hitler/#comment-2393330

    [MORE]

    More highly interesting information from the same very knowledgeable commenter “michael mills”
    [...]
    According to the 1940 report by Karski mentioned above, there was a transit camp at Belzec in December 1939. Its purpose was to hold Jews who were trying to cross from the German Zone of Occupation into the Soviet (at least 300,000 Jews from the German Zone made that crossing in the months after the German conquest of Poland).

    https://www.unz.com/article/against-david-irvings-view-of-hitler/#comment-2395448

    But similar to Dorpat, Vinnai explains the destructive potential in Hitler’s psyche not so much as a result of early childhood experiences, but rather due to trauma that Hitler had suffered as a soldier in World War I. Not only Hitler, but a substantial part of the German population was affected by such war trauma. Vinnai then leaves the psychoanalytical discourse and comments on social psychological questions, such as how Hitler’s political world view could have emerged from his trauma and how this could appeal to large numbers of people.
    [...]
    Understanding Madmen: A DSM-IV Assessment of Adolf Hitler

    https://www.uccs.edu/Documents/dsegal/DSM-Assessment-of-Hitler-IDR-2007.pdf

    It was an unexpected finding that the PTSD scale was so highly elevated. The consensus mean T score (76) was the highest of all the Axis I scales, and two of the four raters saw Hitler three standard deviations above the normative mean while two others rated him above two standard deviations. Even the rater with the lowest T score was a full standard deviation above the normative mean.

    https://www.unz.com/article/against-david-irvings-view-of-hitler/#comment-2388131

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  149. iuztrg says:

    According to public survey data, even as far back as 1995, some 97% of Americans knew of the Holo.caust, far more than were aware of the Pearl Harbor attack or America’s use of the atomic bombs against Japan, while less than half our citizenry were aware that the Soviet Union had been our wartime ally.

    Yes, well, contrary to ‘The Holöcaust’ they didn’t ‘kill’ ’6 Million of The J€ws’ (who later mysteriously reappeared in Isräel).

  150. DFH says:
    @Sparkon

    Mr. Unz should upload the back issues of this. I want to find out what ‘I cracked the Reds’ Lust Capital’ is all about.

    • LOL: Dr. Krieger
  151. annamaria says:
    @Colin Wright

    “…most of your cited facts do nothing to disprove the reality of the Holocaust or even make it less probable.”

    – What is unclear about this well-documented fact? –”the Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s, with Nazi officials traveling to Palestine as honored Zionist guests and leading Nazi newspapers praising the Zionist enterprise… — Germans wanted the Jews to relocate to Palestine.
    — Also, have you read the above article and comments? For instance, comment 46: “Despite unfair limitations imposed by pro-prosecution judges on the defense team, Zündel’s defense team destroyed the traditional narrative in two separate trials. The prosecution eyewitnesses all fell apart on cross-examination, and Hilberg was forced to admit that he not only relied on a single untrustworthy document for his account on Auschwitz, but that he concealed the problems in his source material from his audience.” — Or you want us to believe the “research” of the hysterical dim-wit Deborah Lipstadt?

    “How does the fact that many of the Bolshevik leaders were Jewish demonstrate that the Holocaust didn’t happen?”
    – The same way the Jewish Lobby has sequestered the documentary “Two Hundred Years Together” to cover the enormous crimes by the Jewish Bolsheviks against Russian people, the tribal zealots have been preventing any research of the foundations of Holo-biz. This alone suggests that the Holo-biz is based on lies and more lies. Considering the persecution of the honest historians by the Jewish bandit-devotees of Holocaustianity and the blatant violation of the First Amendment under the pressure from Jewish zealots, it is now the responsibility of the Holocaustians to present the facts that would support their claims on special victimhood aka Holocaust.

    In short, “One naturally wonders whether all these established scholars [Franz Neumann and Hannah Arendt] may have quietly known something that a naive young doctoral candidate such as Hilberg did not.”

  152. @Colin Wright

    Majdanek is still standing. Furthermore, it is very close to the Lublin city center. I reached it a few years ago by taking a city transit bus that barely took 10 minutes from the center. Strange place to locate a supposed extermination center so close to a major city.

  153. Wally says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    We see no proof they were murdered. I can cite claims of and “eyewitnesses” to witchcraft & sea monsters too. That hardly makes them true. Science over propaganda & religion,

    Did the occasional Jew commit suicide? Maybe & so what? Mental illness has always been a problem.

    But then “Holocau$t Industry” Jews say that they all went to immense mass graves and that that the human remain exist in known locations, but those remains do not exist. Therefore what you claim are necessarily lies. Pretty basic stuff, really.

    We note that you do not name the alleged “eyewitnesses”, nor do you tell us exactly what they said, where & when. Telling.

    You mentioned Treblinka:
    Alleged location of Treblinka mass graves / remains of 900,000 Jews according to Treblinka officials, no alleged remains can be shown
    photo from ‘Surviving Treblinka’, by Samuel Willenberg.It is captioned: “crane lifting corpses destined for cremation”.
    Does anyone see any “corpses”? LOL

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Anon
  154. Truth says:

    The ridiculous Holocaust myth was not a war on Khazars by the Germans, but a war on Germans by the Khazars.

  155. Antiwar7 says:
    @Che Guava

    Don’t feel bad! We all make mistakes, including me. We should always remember that. Yours was very minor.

  156. utu says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    This would be like me setting up a GoFundMe for my cancer treatment and then telling you that actually I just have the flu…….but I’m still sick so I should be able to keep the money.

    Excellent analogy.

  157. Wally says:
    @syonredux

    Naturally we see no original, authentic German document, only English text by who knows who.

    Try that in a legit court of law.

    The Kube canard crushed here:

    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=kube

    and:
    ‘Irrefutable Response’ Falls Flat, book review by John Weir

    https://codoh.com/library/document/2590/

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @syonredux
  158. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    It’s not lifting anything. It’s dumping a load

  159. Wally says:
    @bucky

    Except that until those like Greg Johnson realize that the ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are fake & impossible scams, there will never be peace.

    The impossible ‘holocaust’ is used by Jews & their leftist shills for just about everything to their advantage.
    And that advantage is why it was conjured up in the first place.

    Thanks.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @bucky
  160. syonredux says:
    @Wally

    The Kube canard crushed here:

    What exactly is the “Kube canard”? And how exactly has it been crushed?

    Naturally we see no original, authentic German document, only English text by who knows who.

    Try that in a legit court of law.

    Have people questioned the authenticity of the letter?

    • Replies: @Henry's Cat
    , @Wally
  161. Wally says:
    @EugeneGur

    said:
    “As you see, Hitler did a better job and did it a lot faster, too.”

    So, that’s why you cannot present proof? LOL

    This is your big chance. Why do you dodge challenges to your claims?

    We know why.

    It’s amazing how simple it is to slap down lies, just ask for proof.

    http://www.codoh.com

  162. bucky says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    How many people really still care about it? I can’t remember the last holocaust movie that came out.

    You know, Hitler’s approach and the Nazi party approach was completely the wrong way to go about it. Dualities require an opposing force. To this day, Jews practically worship Hitler, and will deploy his image for local election ads.

    Disputing the reality of the event is kind of a petty thing to do. The approach shouldn’t be to dispute the reality, it is to dispute the significance. And amends have been made, and you know what? Many of those amends were legitimate. But they’ve been made.

    Acknowledge the error. Move on. That is how to go about it.

    Sure, several million were killed in the context of a war. The lesson should be to not to go war so that such deprivations happen. That actually is Pat Buchanan’s take on it, and he’s got it right. He doesn’t dispute that some sort of mass killing occurred. His take is that if the United States hadn’t entered WWII, the deprivation which led to the killing of Jews and other minorities would not have occurred.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wally
  163. Wally says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    said:
    “No one denies that a substantial number of Jews were killed in WW2″

    Really?
    How were they supposedly “killed”?
    How many are considered “substantial”?
    Where is your proof they were “killed”?

    We’re talking about an alleged massive crime, physical proof, forensics required

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Johnny Smoggins
  164. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @bucky

    I used to be a Probation Officer. I knew guys who’d lived in the fire fighting camps. When they got sentenced again they hoped to be sent to a firefighting camp. They have to speak and understand English to fight fires so they’re mostly black.

    California inmates love the fire fighting camps. They live in nice outdoor camps in the mountains. They have pets although they aren’t supposed too.

    They don’t fight fires as a regular job, just when there are fires. They do most of the work in the camps. They have classes in all sorts of trades and occupations. Unfortunately, they can’t get jobs when they get out because evil American liberal capitalists only went illegal Hispanics for most jobs

    Getting accepted into the camps is difficult. They need a record of good behavior and ability to follow instruction and cooperate with fellow fire workers.

    The camps are open. They can walk away easily. But they don’t
    California convicts like those camps and they like the machoness and adrenaline rush of fire fighting.

    They aren’t in much danger because they are’nt skilled and experienced. They live life in the firefighting camps and are proud of being firefighters.

    The cause of American crime is that too many criminals are out committing crimes and too few are in prison.

    • Replies: @utu
  165. @Ron Unz

    Well, it all sounds kind of vague to me. Maybe [Churchill] was referring to …

    Churchill’s memo (11 July 11 1944) records that it was in reference to “Foreign Secretary[ Anthony Eden]‘s minute of 6.7.44 replying to M 782/4 of 2.7.44 about the persecution of Jews in Hungary, and the evacuation of Jews from enemy-controlled territory”.

    https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/churchill/interactive/_html/wc0213_3.html

    Note that four days earlier on July 7, and one day after Eden’s referenced communication, Churchill also wrote to him to support the request by the Jewish Agency (via Chaim Weizmann) to bomb the rail lines going to Auschwitz.

    https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/churchill/interactive/_html/wc0213_2.html

    The Eden document from July 7 presumably discussed the extermination camp at Auschwitz and possibly the German extermination program more generally. By “science” Churchill is probably talking about gas chambers. But the Eden communique and Churchill memorandum 782/4 should be publicly available somewhere, so this part could be checked.

    The bottom line is still the same: Faurrison is a weasel, and Churchill’s book contains a succint statement of the standard Holocaust account as uniquely exceptional, technologically specialized, state-organized murder of Jews.

    • Replies: @bj
    , @annamaria
    , @Felix Krull
  166. bucky says:
    @Wally

    No, Greg Johnson simply is looking beyond Nazism.

    Trying to minimize the crimes and missteps of the Nazi regime is what this is all about.

    The history of the European peoples is not defined by Nazism. Nazism is one extreme outlier, that was caused by an extreme confluence of events. It is not some alien infestation or whatever, which is how it is depicted in so much of popular culture today.

    But the extreme of “Martian Nazis” is also met with the extreme of “innocent Nazis” which is what is going on here too much.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  167. Wally says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome

    said:
    “Partisans?”

    aka: terrorists in today’s parlance

    Jews were very prevalent among the partisans / terrorists.
    And being illegal, per international law, these non-uniformed combatants were subject to legal executions when caught. Both the Axis & Allied powers executed them when caught.

    But the Zionist game is to claim that those who were legally executed by the Axis powers were ‘holocaust’ victims.

    http://www.codoh.com

  168. phil says:
    @escobar

    Where are the mass graves of bones and/or ash for 5 million people? How were they killed? Gas chambers? Where?

  169. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    said:
    “Secondly, Auschwitz exists. You can go see it. Want to go see Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor? They’re level fields. There’s nothing there. So Auschwitz continues to be where you go to pay your respects, so to speak. As with the MIA/POW controversy, it’d be awkward to change the story at this point. There needs to be a shrine. Auschwitz is it. ‘Don’t talk shit about Auschwitz!’
    However, and this is important, it doesn’t follow from this that the Holocaust didn’t occur. It — or at least most of it — just happened someplace other than at Auschwitz. That’s all.”

    - When cognitive dissonance sets in we often see desperate attempts at ‘holocaust-lite’.
    So what other places did the alleged ‘holocaust’ supposedly occur? We’re waiting. Proof required.

    - Treblinka & Sobibor are really not “level fields.”
    They both contain alleged immense mass graves. Treblinka, an alleged 900,000 Jews, Sobibor, an alleged 250,000 Jews.

    Here are the alleged sites of such claims.

    Sobibor ‘monument’ supposedly over the remains of 250,000 Jew, actual remains of the alleged 250,000 cannot be shown.
    Alleged location of Treblinka mass graves / remains of 900,000 Jews according to Treblinka officials, no alleged remains can be shown
    No immense human remains that are alleged to be in known locations, no ‘holocaust’.

    http://www.codoh.com

  170. utu says:
    @Anon

    The cause of American crime is that too many criminals are out committing crimes and too few are in prison.

    The US has 3.5 higher incarceration rate than Germany had prior to the WWII in 1939 (including konzentration lagers) . Even if Black inmate population was to be excluded from the statistics the incarceration rate still would be higher by factor of two than in Nazi Germany in 1939. Whatever it is about “The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave” it creates more crimes and criminals than any Western country in the history of Western civilization and you are saying that not enough is being locked up which is to be expected form the employee of the American Prison Industrial Complex.

    • Replies: @syonredux
    , @Anon
  171. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘…I am against all brainwashing & taboos, but hard-core holo-deniers, whichever their motives, seem to me a bunch of lunatics not worthy to be bothered about.’

    Hear hear. I certainly don’t think they should be silenced, but to my mind, they rank with the ‘there were no planes on 9/11′ and Israel supporters and ‘blacks are just victims of racism’ and global warming denialists and all the rest.

    As a rule, I don’t even bother to argue with them, and they clog up the forums, but they’re part of the cross to be borne if we’re to have a free society. Those who would silence them worry me more.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  172. Sean says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Well it is possible that older people weakened by lack of food would have almost all died off when forced into overcrowded and dirty conditions, but by the same token they were useless mouths to feed and would not have died fast enough. It would make economic sense to immediately gas them. Every story is some kind of image or lie.

  173. @anarchyst

    ‘…You see, these children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and other unrelated individuals are also seen as jewish “holocaust ™” survivors, worthy of reparations and special treatment…’

    As he himself has pointed out, Norm Finkelstein would emphatically qualify to be included in that group.

    He admittedly hasn’t received reparations, but he’s inarguably been subjected to ‘special treatment.’

    • Replies: @annamaria
  174. Cyrano says:

    Why the fixation on number six in the official “mythology” of the holocaust? Well it’s obvious. As the author himself noted – they were talking about 6 million Jewish victims even prior to the holocaust – pogrom victims or potential victims or what have you.

    That’s the first 6 million. The holocaust is the 2nd 6 million, and as we know today the Jewish population of Israel is 6 million – that’s the 3rd 6 million. And we all know what 3 6’s mean. I mean come on, 666 is the sign of the devil. Do I need to explain more to you?

  175. Wally says:

    FYI:
    This article is now posted at The CODOH Forum for discussion, debate:

    unz.com: !! ‘American Pravda: Holocaust Denial’ !! / join the debate

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11968

    No immense human remains that are alleged, no ‘holocaust’.

    http://www.codoh.com

  176. @Hippopotamusdrome

    ‘Partisans?’

    No doubt in many cases, but as a rule, armed, trained, and organized bodies of Red Army soldiers must have been a greater threat than random groups of fugitives.

    In any case, the Jewish fugitives described being hunted down in Ordinary Men were hardly partisans. They offered about as much resistance as rabbits.

    • Replies: @Dr. Krieger
  177. @bucky

    ‘…Nazism is one extreme outlier, that was caused by an extreme confluence of events. It is not some alien infestation or whatever, which is how it is depicted in so much of popular culture today.

    But the extreme of “Martian Nazis” is also met with the extreme of “innocent Nazis” which is what is going on here too much.’

    Indeed. Ironically, both extremes impose the same hazard. ‘Martian Nazis’ make the whole Third Reich epsiode irrelevant to us, because of course we wouldn’t do anything like that, because we’re decent, rational people, responding to what we perceive as genuine threats. Well, the Nazis didn’t come from Mars, and they were ‘decent, rational people, responding to what they perceived as genuine threats.’

    We can do the same thing they did, and in some places, and in some respects, we already are starting to.

    ‘Innocent Nazis’ poses the same risk, even if for the opposite reason. We aren’t likely to repeat Nazi crimes, because there were no crimes.

  178. @Colin Wright

    Those who would silence them worry me more.

    This certainly is true. As Spinoza had said: In a free society, man speaks what he thinks- and thinks whatever he wishes.

  179. @Wally

    I can’t quantify what I said, and I’m not going to hazard a guess.

    Coincidentally, I’m reading Butz’ book now and the number being tossed around is 1 – 1.25 million Jews killed. “Killed” could mean anything from dying from typhus (as the sainted Anne Frank did, along with many, many non Jews – such were the conditions of war) to hard wartime conditions that took out the very young, the elderly and the sick to outright murder at the hands of National Socialists.

    All I know is that I’ve been fed a massive pile of bullshit my whole life regarding “the holocaust” and I hope I live long enough to see holocaust museums and memorials either bulldozed or turned into monuments to the millions and millions of non Jews who were killed by bolshevism/communism which I’ve now come to see as just weaponized Judaism.

  180. RVBlake says:

    I watched a David Irving presentation on Youtube years ago…Irving stated that re-opened Soviet archives claimed 66,000 deaths at Auschwitz. Irving generously granted the Reds a a 50% margin of error and rounded the figure up to 100,000.

    • Replies: @Henry's Cat
  181. syonredux says:
    @utu

    The US has 3.5 higher incarceration rate than Germany had prior to the WWII in 1939 (including konzentration lagers) . Even if Black inmate population was to be excluded from the statistics the incarceration rate still would be higher by factor of two than in Nazi Germany in 1939. Whatever it is about “The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave” it creates more crimes and criminals than any Western country

    You might want to examine role of race:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/

    God knows that I have my problems with Ron, but he’s done good work on this topic…..

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @utu
  182. @escobar

    ” By the way, no serious historian has mentioned the “Six Million” figure for years, in Germany and the USA they’ve settled on 5.1 to 5.2 million. The fake memoirs and plagiarized accounts do not change what happened.”

    Examples? I and many others still hear of the 6 million endlessly. I’m sure a sizable number of historians (even Jewish ones) think the number is a million lower, but the 6 million, by most everything I’ve seen, is the widely accepted one.

  183. Moi says:
    @Anonymous

    Nothing but respect for Mr. Unz. It would take intelligence and courage to write this.

  184. why are there no commenters who believe lipstadt and believe it was RIGHT?

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
    , @Anon
  185. Jewish fatalities were some 99% lower than the widely-believed total. Furthermore, Jewish deaths actually showed a sharp decline once plentiful supplies of Zyklon B arrived

    Can anyone imagine a future world where Zyklon B is recognized as having saved Jewish lives?

    Try our New Improved Zyklon B+, Now with Extra Cynanide! Endorsed by over 6 million Jews! Better living through chemistry from Degussa

    Somehow I think Zyklon B, like DDT, is a permanently damaged brand.

    • Replies: @byrresheim
  186. bj says:
    @academic gossip

    The factual holocaust was the fire bombing of German cities,

    incinerating millions of German men, women, and children.

    You are repeating a blood libel against the German people.

    Jews are inverting inverting reality for cash.

    Six million Jews claimed reparations as Holocaust survivors.

    Fake Jewish Holocaust survivors are liars and extortionists.

    You are a liar; have you no shame?

  187. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @utu

    Find my post about Rabbi Chaim Michael Dov Weissmandel’s book,
    From The Depths.

    He was there in the middle of it all. His opinion is that the communist Zionists worked with the Germans to separate children and teens from their parents. And train them to be good commie zionists and smuggle them by the standard smuggling routes to Palestine to be the work force of the kibbutzes IDF and be the strong militant New Jewish Man of Israel.

    According to Weissmandel the commie Zionist’s were happy to let the Germans do what they wished not just to the religious Jews but to the bourgeois business owners White collar non communist Jews.

  188. bj says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Fifty-five million died in WWII,

    What makes a few Jews so special?

    Have you no shame?

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
  189. red-ice says:
    @anarchyst

    - All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators:” 23.1.49, The Sunday Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four and five months..The investigators would put a black hood over the accused’s head, punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. Observer & American judge, van Roden

    - Judge van Roden’s allegation of torture to gain “confessions” is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    Wrong!

    According to Freda Utley’s book, The High Cost of Vengeance – this applies to the “Dachau trials.”, not Nuremberg.

    Chapter 7 quote:

    These were the trials conducted by the United States Army Tribunals (as distinct from the civilian and ostensibly international trials at Nuremberg) of the privates, corporals, sergeants, and junior commissioned officers involved in the Malmedy case; of civilians accused of having lynched Allied airmen shot down during the bombing raids; and of the Germans held responsible for the atrocities committed in the Nazi concentration camps.

    Use the link and keep reading nex few pages;

    http://www.unz.com/book/freda_utley__the-high-cost-of-vengeance/#p_8_13

    • Replies: @Wally
  190. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @utu

    If the American criminals weren’t in prison the crime rate would be much higher and even your criminal loving liberal self might be a victim of crime

    We have more people in prison because we have more criminals. That’s all.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Johan Meyer
  191. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @syonredux

    America has more people in prison because we have more criminals.
    That’s all.

    In the 1950s we had more people in elementary school because we had a high population of 5 to 13 year olds.
    That’s all.

    In 2018 we have more people in nursing homes because we have more 75 to 100 year old people. That’s all.

  192. iffen says:

    It’s a good thing that debunking oil comes in 55 gallon drums.

  193. Tremendous article. Exceptional analysis. Thank you Ron Unz.

    I’ve witnessed the scripted, vaunted, orchestrated, hyper-serious, televised rise of ‘unique Jewish Suffering’ (The Holocaust) and generalized Jewish victimology creep into American life and the American mind for the better part of a century. During this time, American culture has shifted dramatically. This unpopular transformation is still underway. And it is doing harm.

    Our captured nation is speeding into a brave, new, multicultural, Zionist-friendly world of hyper-militarism and economic globalism. Some will win, many will lose.

    Along with the rise pro-Zionist serial warfare abroad is the rise of demographic ‘diversity’ here at home. This is no coincidence. One people’s power and solidarity often grows at the expense of another. This is a strategy of conquest.

    Witness the decline in white status, ‘white privilege’, white cohesion, and even life expectancy of blue-collar and middle-America whites.

    Meanwhile, global Zio-Jewish wealth and power is on a tear; as is Washington’s unparallelled commitment to Israeli ‘security’ and our nation’s ‘unshakable’ (i.e. unconditional) alliance with the ethnic-cleansing, Zionist state.

    Does this seem natural or wise?

    Is Washington’s proclaimed love affair with Israel organic, mutually-beneficial, and morally-sound?–or is it due to other forces: some concocted and many duplicitous?

    Consider also: as America becomes (deliberately) less white and less Christian, Israel (with unconditional US aid and succor) is becoming defiantly ‘more Jewish’–with new laws that elevate and empower Israel’s Jewish majority at the expense of that nation’s native, non-Jewish population.

    Israel’s latest legal decree involving its ‘Jewish character’ amount to a race-based assault on its Arab citizenry. This fact is undeniable.

    In America, such laws would be absolutely illegal and loudly condemned by all, including Jews.

    But few or no prominent Americans dare mention or criticize Israel’s latest step towards absolute Jewish supremacism.

    But what about America alleged commitment to ‘equality’?

    Is not America ‘opposed to racism in all its forms’?

    If America is, as claimed, a nation which allegedly goes to war to protect ‘human rights’, then why does Israel’s discriminatory and supremacist trajectory not register among elite Americans or elite American institutions?

    The silence is deafening. The complicity is embarrassing. And revealing.

    We are not only a nation that lives comfortably with countless myths and fabrications, but some are used to prop up a supremacist foreign power.

    This explains why so many US foreign policies and the ‘values’ which nourish them are ad hoc. Contrived. Made up. Politicized.

    Thus there is no genuine connection or consistency between ‘minority protections’ in the US compared to the routine outrages perpetrated by our steadfast ‘democratic ally’ way over yonder.

    This game of deception involving ‘speech’ is being played out in courts and ministries around the world as well as on global media platforms such as Facebook, Google and Twitter. It’s basically a power struggle.

    Free expression is falling before kosher edicts that protect ‘memory’ (The Holocaust) along with its sustaining fables, libels and myths. Protect the dominant narrative!

    America too has entered a new era. With the decline of Christianity (and the rise of the Jews) has come our new quasi-state religion: Holocaust worship and Holocaust remembrance.

    Holocaust indoctrination is only on in film and on our TVs, it’s in our schools and universities. Dissent is not allowed.

    In addition, there are hundreds of Judeo-centric monuments/museums all over the Western world. These icons are devoted to recording an alleged event that occurred during one cataclysmic war in one region of Europe. You may not deride their meaning, their accuracy, or their significance.

    Once the Jewish experience in Europe during WWII was a mere footnote to the greatest war in human history. Now the reverse is true. The meaning and importance of WWII now pales besides ‘The Holocaust’.

    What’s behind this grand reversal?

    The answer is obvious: organized Jewry.

    • Agree: ChuckOrloski
  194. @EugeneGur

    ‘Actually, he didn’t – Stalin, I mean. Stalin was just an apprentice by comparison…’

    I was referring to their cooperative efforts that resulted in the deaths of about sixteen million Russian soldiers from 1941 to 1945. Obviously, Hitler actually killed most of them, but without stunningly profligate and often outright idiotic Russian tactics, he never could have bagged so many.

    In any case, the point is that either that or Chinese civilian deaths represents the greatest single category of human loss of life in World War Two, not the Holocaust.

    • Replies: @EugeneGur
  195. utu says:
    @syonredux

    You might want to examine role of race

    I think I did:

    Even if Black inmate population was to be excluded from the statistics the incarceration rate still would be higher by factor of two than in Nazi Germany in 1939.

    • Replies: @Anon
  196. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @bucky

    There’s a new movie. Operation Finale about the kidnapping and trial of Euchmann.

  197. @Svigor

    Yep, that’s the guy who was bragging about having sex with the underage Russian girls.

  198. Art says:

    “Holocaust Denial” is a fait accompli – because the reason behind “the six million lie” has already failed.

    The purpose for telling the lie was to gain sympathy for Jews and Israel. In 1967 it was working – in 2017 it is failing. Jews have squandered their legacy of pity. Except for some Zionist Christians, good will is vanishing.

    Today, average people around the world, see the Jews as unsympathetic. Fascist Jew treatment of the Palestinians darkens the perception of all Jews.

    Not true, a quarter true, half true – it makes no difference, because people have already judged the Jews — and it is not pretty.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

    • Replies: @renfro
  199. utu says:
    @Anon

    Or perhaps because we have too many useless parole officers like yourself who can’t do their job.

    • Replies: @Anon
  200. Mike P says:
    @Anon

    I looked around for this book, but can’t find it anywhere (paper or electronically). Would you be in a position to prepare a digitized copy? (I know it’s work, but I have put several books online myself, so I feel entitled to ask.)

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  201. Altait says:

    I think Ron sometimes treats anti-establishment theories too easily.

    It’s not at all strange that many half or quarter Jews populated areas of the German military, such persons were, afterall, half or three quarters German. It was essentially still the Prussian military. This does not mean that the pervading attitude of Nazism wasn’t to desire the removal of the Ashkenazi Jews who had only very recently come to Germany (A fact which I always find missing from discussions of German Jews who now seem to totally dominate German history) and were regarded as an utterly alien and unpleasant force who frustrated the self-determination and interests of the German people. (Not to mention Jewish behaviour which rarely engenders much affection from outgroups) And that under capitalism, they could have deeply destabilising effects. How that was to be achieved certainly didn’t only involve murder as the well-documented efforts to make life unpleasant and encourage Jewish emigration.

    So I don’t find the idea that the Nazis didn’t want Jews gone as much as possible from Germany and were only acting in response to Communism to hold much water.

    I do think it’s impossible to argue that the holy 6 million number is unquestionable. As Ron mentioned, there is no solid documentation and the number 6 million was thrown around pre-war and during WWI by Jewish organisations who had little qualms about yellow press and nobody has ever really given a good reason for that number. (Such a number is the upper limit of the number of Jews in Central/Eastern Europe) It’s unquestionable that the entire field of Holocaust studies can be folded into Economics, Gender Studies and Sociology for being utterly worthless by academic standards and totally concerned with political advocacy. But it’s also unquestionable to see that the large Jewish communities that existed in many places in central and Eastern Europe (Though they had themselves exploded in number only recently at the time) were largely gone after the war and it couldn’t be accounted for just by emigration to the US and Israel.

    As for why it wasn’t of interest for the Allied leaders in their books. I haven’t read them, but do they give much mention to the mass deaths from the famines in the Netherlands, Greece, Ukraine, Russia or Norway? Probably not, because they had little to do with them (Or in the case of Churchill, were caused by him) and were largely footnotes in regards to an account of the actual war. The Holocaust has the added bonus of taking place in the Eastern front. The fact that the Holocaust was probably smaller in scale also helps to explain their indifference. As does the likely antipathy all 3 leaders had towards the Jewish ethnic lobbies in their countries.

    • Replies: @Unstremian
    , @Wally
  202. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:

    Wikipedia entry on Arthur Butz:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Butz

    According to the Anti-Defamation League, many of Butz’ arguments were thoroughly debunked in Deborah Lipstadt’s 1993 book Denying the Holocaust, and in John C. Zimmerman’s 2000 book Holocaust Denial: Demographics, Testimonies and Ideologies.[9]

    • LOL: Mike P
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wally
  203. FKA Max says: • Website
    @FKA Max

    Typo: I read the entire article right *away* last night after I saw it published.

    This is a very good talk on historical revisionism by Jonathan Bowden:

    Revisionism:
    Left & Right, Hard & Soft

    November 3, 2007

    [MORE]

    Now this talk which I’m going to give on Revisionism, Left and Right, hard and soft, could be construed in the future as a dangerous talk, because the Chancellor of contemporary Federal Germany would like to extend, as a particular remit of the constitution/treaty which is being negotiated at the present time, the idea that revisionist laws—or more accurately, anti-revisionist laws—that exist in certain Continental societies which have allegedly “known Fascism” at a particular period, be extended to this society and to all other EU access states, including a great wave of Eastern European countries who of course have acceded to the Union in recent years.

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2012/05/revisionism/ Archived link: http://archive.is/1DNvO

  204. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    The published diary was ghost written by American author Meyer Levin and he proved it in his breach of contract lawsuit. His attorney supeonaed Frank’s original work that purported to be Anne’s diary A comparison showed that the book published as Anne’s Diary was significantly different from the diary Otto allegedly retrieved after the war.

    The courts findings were that Levin, not Anne wrote the book published as The Diary of Anne Frank. Levin was awarded the $50,000 Frank promised but it was never collected. There were many hearings

    I gather you don’t believe me. The case was

    Meyer Levin vs Otto Frank Et Al Supreme Court of New York Special Term NY County NY 41130 150 NYS

    Go to any NY legal data base to find it.

    Or don’t and go on claiming I’m lying or whatever you’re claiming.

    • Replies: @renfro
  205. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Only thing I can suggest is to check a college library. If that fails ask the Library of Congress to send you a copy and you can put it in a 3 ring binder.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the book has disappeared from college libraries.

  206. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Lipstadt is a Jewish liar. Butz was a professor of chemical engineering which is gas engineering. His books is strictly from an expert engineering point of view.
    Wikipedia even 5 th graders are told not to rely on it. And ADL??? Founded to defend the right of a Jew to rape and murder a 12 year old

  207. Kelso says:

    Bravo!!
    I have read most of the books cited in this article and agree with the summary and conclusions.
    The Holocaust is a hoax intended to justify the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.
    If you drive a stake in the heart of the Holocaust, Zionism, a racist, terrorist ideology, is defeated.

    • Replies: @RBS
  208. trupright says:

    My doubts regarding the so-called Holocaust began with one thought. Why would anyone use poison gas to kill large numbers of people in the middle of a massive labor camp? The gas would have to be vented somehow to supposedly allow bodies to be collected and where would this lethal gas go? WWI showed how dangerous gas could be even to those using it and why would the very intelligent Germans run the very great risk of having the released gas kill slave laborers or even German soldiers in the camp. Nonsense. Obviously the lie about gas was to make it appear that the Germans looked upon the Jews as vermin, as lice, as insect-life which poison gas was used upon.

    Once you take even a few seconds to think about this one fact, then the Holocaust quickly turns into the Holohoax.

    Germans could have easily used simple water to drown the Jews in the showers with no risk at all and could even reuse the water. But this method somehow escaped the Germans’ minds.

    Israel should be completely defunded to repay for this criminal hoax and all the dishonest museums of the Holocaust should be flattened and salt spread upon them.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wally
    , @tac
  209. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @utu

    My job was to argue for the longest possible sentences to protect POS liberals like yourself from criminals.

    And I did my job.

    More criminals in prison, the less crime on the outside.

    • Replies: @utu
  210. annamaria says:
    @academic gossip

    the “state-organized murder” was an invention of the Jewish Bolsheviks. Unlike the extortionist schema of holo-biz, the barbarian slaughter of Russians by the Jewish KGB’ activists and the Jewish murderers in GULAG is well-documented. Time for Russians to demand reparations from the Jewish bankers worldwide.
    Samples:
    “Naftaly Frenkel was born in Haifa… Frenkel is best known for his role in the organisation of work in the Gulag, starting from the forced labor camp of the Solovetsky Islands, which is recognised as one of the earliest sites of the Gulag. One of Frenkel’s innovations in the labor camps is the “you-eat-as-you-work” system or the “nourishment scale”. This system resulted in a high death toll in the camps.” https://tarbaby.wordpress.com/2017/07/22/gulags-frenkels-efficiency-system/
    “Lazar Kaganovich was one of a small group of Stalin’s top sadists pushing for very high rates of collectivization after 1929. He became Stalin’s butcher of Christian Russians during the late 1920s and early 1930s when the Kremlin launched its war against the kulaks (small landowners who were Christians) and implemented a ruthless policy of land collectivization. The resulting state-organized forced famine, was a planned genocide and killed 7,000,000 Ukrainians between 1932 and 1933, and inflicted enormous suffering on the Soviet Central Asian republic of Kazakhstan.” https://rense.com/general11/stal.htm

  211. annamaria says:
    @Colin Wright

    Think the immense trauma that the Jewish Bolsheviks have inflicted on several generations of Russians.

  212. @syonredux

    I believe he refers to existence of a communication between Kube and Himmler: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Kube#SS_career

    Hardcore revisionists like Hannover won’t accept any evidence for the mass killings of civilians by German forces (outside, perhaps, reprisal shootings), and so must dispute all the documentary evidence for the Einsatzgruppen, police battalions, etc. on the Eastern front.

    Wiser revisionists concentrate on the gas chamber stories.

    • Replies: @Wally
  213. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @utu

    Germans are a notoriously docile law abiding ethnic group, even the descendants of Germans who migrated to the USA S America Russia Poland and other countries

    We Americans are not. Irish and Scots rebels and border bandits crazy puritans, slave traders, moon shiners old country mafia who established mafias as soon as they arrived isolated farmers who fought off Indian raids.

    The conquest of Indian terrority was done more by civilian settlers than the army. Look at how many of us have guns.

    • Replies: @fnn
  214. unseated says:
    @Johnnie Walker Read

    It has been pointed out here many times before that that quote is not from Voltaire but Kevin Alfred Strom. While its content may have some validity, using a quote from Strom is probably not a good idea.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom

  215. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    This piece evokes controversy without answering many questions. It fails, for example, to define the Holocaust, so leaving unclear the meaning of the central issue, namely Holocaust denial. According to my Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 2nd Edn., 1974, the Holocaust was the systematic destruction of over six million Jews before and during WW2 by the Nazis. So does that make the Jewish Holocaust scholar, Raul Hilberg, who estimated just over five million Jewish victims of the Nazis, a Holocaust denier?

    And it would have been useful also to know how the Holocaust is defined in statutes of governments that have made Holocaust denial a criminal offense. Who knows, but that anyone of us, by a casual remark here, could become liable to prosecution while traveling abroad, or even while staying home in Canada.

    It would have been useful had the question of the gas chambers and Zyglon B been put in perspective. Some people seem to think them essential to the concept of the Holocaust and its denial, yet as WoO remarks above, the Germans were short of labor and of food, so what more reasonable assumption than that they put Jews, and others, to work as slave labor on starvation rations, leading to the death of many by starvation and disease. So one would like to know whether denial of mass killings with Zyglon B, an agent developed for the delousing soldier’s clothing, constitutes Holocaust Denial.

    Concerning the rise of Holocaust awareness, the author mentions that it did not emerge as a significant issue until long after the war. It is the case, however, that there were those pushing the story very soon after the war. Thus, I remember, in 1953, while at the age of 10 and travelling with my parents on an ocean voyage, being told by a boy of about my age, that the Germans had gassed six million Jews.

    In evaluating the evidence of the Holocaust, some comment on Solzhenitsyn’s claim, which seem to corroborate Hilberg’s conclusion that most killings of Jewish civilians during WW2 were by open-air shootings in Eastern Europe, would have been of interest. Solzhenitsyn’s numbers more or less match Hilberg’s, so are we to suppose that both a life-long Jewish scholar of the Holocaust and a Nobel Prize winning novelist are both completely deluded? If not, how can the Holocaust, i.e, the direct or instigated murder of millions of Jews by the Nazis be so easily dismissed?

    What I do find disquieting in this account of Holocaust denialism is the evidence it provides of punishment of those in both Europe and North America who, having researched the issue, came to conclusions that conflict with the claims of known liars such as Eli Wiesel, and have as a consequence, had their careers and livelihood’s destroyed. So much for American leadership of the Free World.

  216. @RVBlake

    Those were the so-called Death Books. They didn’t cover the entirety of the camp’s existence. Using these and other documents, Carlo Mattogno estimated the total number of deaths of registered Auschwitz inmates was in the region of 130,000, of which about half, I believe, would have been Jews.

    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
  217. Imho Ron Unz has earned a Nobel Prize for Peace due to his relentless pursuit of truth.

    This article is long and I have yet to read the second half but Unz not only challenges the official story and inflated #s of the ‘holocaust’ he addresses a fundamental fact: Jews, despite being the most murderous group of the 20th century-bolshevik russia-have been portrayed as victims. How? As the essay outlines, via a propaganda campaign.

    Incredible.

    Again, thank you for your courage Mr Unz and your example. The truth only dies if we let it.

    • Replies: @Wally
  218. @jilles dykstra

    He heeft dat boek niet geleest.

    A Nation on Trial defends the German Nation against the charges in Hitler’s Willing Executioners, within the framework of the Holocaust.

  219. utu says:
    @Anon

    The problem with the CDC is that they hired too many simpletons like yourself.

  220. @Anon

    Rubbish. A quick estimate of relative incarceration versus crime may be found by comparing the ratios of incarceration rates to murder rates by country. IIRC USA ranks about 75th percentile in incarceration per murder.

    Also, see chapter 3 of “The rich get richer, the poor get prison” (8th edition, at least)—nine in ten anonymously surveyed USAns admit to felonies, which they quite often do not even recognize as such.

    • Replies: @Anon
  221. @Johan Meyer

    Bloody auto-error insert. “Je” not he.

  222. Wally says:
    @dearieme

    fact:
    Erhard Milch was not a Jew.

    His mother re-married a Jew after Milch’s birth.

    http://www.codoh.com

  223. @Colin Wright

    Hunting rabbits is no cake walk. Ask Elmer Fudd.

    • LOL: Colin Wright
  224. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @trupright

    Easily used water in the showers to drown the Jews? Easy really? Did you do experiments with your cats perhaps? Or just blather?

    And what’s the problem with the right gas used the right way like someone shutting a room while setting off an insect killing bomb?

    • Replies: @Anon
  225. Wally says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    You curiously ignore the many before Unz which have put their asses on the line, were imprisoned, physically attacked, house fire bombed, driven from their jobs, persecuted, stalked, on & on.

    But now, Unz being a Jew, we see praise for the truth bringers.

    Ron deserves praise, but he’s late to the party.

    It’s men like Germar Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Dr. Robert Faurisson, Juergen Graf, Carlo Mattogno, Ernst Zundel. Joseph Bellinger, etc., etc., that deserve the Nobel Peace Prize.

    http://www.codoh.com

  226. Wally says:
    @CanSpeccy

    said: “yet as WoO remarks above, the Germans were short of labor and of food, so what more reasonable assumption than that they put Jews, and others, to work as slave labor on starvation rations, leading to the death of many by starvation and disease. So one would like to know whether denial of mass killings with Zyglon B, an agent developed for the delousing soldier’s clothing, constitutes Holocaust Denial.”

    There were no starvation rations, the Germans ate same as the workers ate. There was a breakdown of food & medical supplies near the end of the war due toillegal Allied terror bombing / strafing of transports into the labor sites. see: The Nazis and SS shared their food with the Jews: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6040

    To repeat, per your absurdly alleged immense shootings / ‘Holocaust by Bullets’, the ‘holocau$t’ Industry now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.
    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?

    There were NO homicidal ‘gas chambers’, period. For a thorough demolition of the alleged Auschwitz gas chambers & alleged Auschwitz homicidal gassing process see analysis at: http://forum.codoh.com/search.php?keywords=model&t=10798&sf=msgonly
    and:
    The Rudolf Report / Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html
    and:
    ‘Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau’ by Master Chemist Germar Rudolf: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html
    and:
    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau

    I suggest you actually do some reading of this thread before you post.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
    , @CanSpeccy
  227. Anonymous[419] • Disclaimer says:

    If Germany was able to prevail in Europe, Japan was somehow capable of landing troops in California, and both countries were blockading America, what would have happened to all those Japanese in the internment camps? The American government identified and quarantined racial-political hostiles as the Germans and other nations did during the war.

    Sure, they were treated fine when the war was thousands of miles away and America was exporting food, but if push came to shove, if Americans were starving and blockaded, if domestic bases had to be abandoned in the face of an enemy offensive, the Japanese-Americans would probably have been slowly starved out and/or exterminated lest they serve as assets to their captors, similar to what happened in occupied Europe in the later years of the war.

    • Agree: Dr. Krieger
  228. Twinkie says:
    @Ron Unz

    I’ve long held Holocaust Denialism in low regard, but your long and thorough piece has given me much to read and look for myself. You are either insane or courageous… or both.

    As for this:

    Indeed, the fascinating and widely-praised 2002 book Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg notes that aside from Milch, Hitler’s military contained over a dozen half-Jewish generals and admirals and another dozen quarter-Jews of that same high rank, plus a total of roughly 150,000 additional half- or quarter-Jewish soldiers, with a large fraction of these being officers. All of these individuals would have had some fully-Jewish parents or grand-parents, which seems decidedly odd behavior for a regime supposedly so focused on the total eradication of the Jewish race.

    Forget military figures and read about the man who was apparently SS member no. 2 after Hitler himself: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emil_Maurice

    He managed to be an intimate of Hitler, be his driver and bodyguard, stay on as a senior SS officer, and even ”cuckholded” Hitler with his half-niece and rumored lover Geli Raubal, and still somehow survived the war and went right back to his pre-Nazi and pre-war profession… all the while being of Jewish ancestry.

    • Replies: @Wally
  229. @Wally

    I disagree.

    There are several paragraphs in which Unz ties things together viz. the Jews i. Bolshevik Russia and their murderous track record and the ‘holocaust’ and it’s use as a tool of propaganda victimhood etc.

    For a jew to lay out his group s dirty laundry is beyond commendable, considering g how vicious Jews are at enforcement of ‘truth’.

    • Replies: @Wally
  230. Wally says:
    @trupright

    The scientifically impossible ‘gas chambers’ claims were technically laughable, and you’re right, gassings as alleged would have endangered the entire site.
    see:
    alleged Auschwitz homicidal gassing process reviewd and demolished here.: http://forum.codoh.com/search.php?keywords=model&t=10798&sf=msgonly

    You’ll enjoy this:
    Drawn in ‘Auschwitz Jews being marched to gas chambers‘, ON A ROOF.LOL!
    VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story : https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11669&p=87558

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the ridiculous ‘holocaust’ storyline is the message.

    http://www.codoh.com

  231. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mike P

    Hi Mike.

    I looked in the UCLA library on line catalog . It’s not there anymore. The library it was in has bathrooms on each floor. A lot of anti communist anti liberal books have been dumped in the bathroom trash cans over the years.

    Gotta fight the fascists you know.

    The book appears as lost for a few years. When they can’t find it they take it off. The books in the forbidden book section like the protocols always show up in the catalog.

    I’ll look in some other college libraries in the area. And the library of Congress catalog I think I can get in it’s catalog.

  232. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    You amount to Holocaust Desecration. Skepticism is one thing. You’re just nuts.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @annamaria
  233. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Historical trivia After the communists destroyed the countryside everybody got on trains to find refuge in the cities or to go as Far East as possible to get to China.
    So Lenin set up delousing stations in many train stations and everybody had to use them. They must have been some kind of body lice, not head lice?

  234. Art says:

    Writing and publishing this article is an act of great courage.

    Mr. Unz is a personage – a public figure. With this article, he is giving that up.

    In Mr. Unz’s intellectual circles, he will be shunned. Friendships will be lost.

    We salute your courage Mr. Ron Unz.

    Thanks!

    Think Peace — Art

    • Replies: @JoeFour
  235. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:

    David Cole was also accused of being a denier. But he rejected certain details of what happened at Auschwitz. He never denied that there was mass killing of Jews.

    http://takimag.com/article/how_many_jews_can_be_gassed_on_the_head_of_a_pin_david_cole/#axzz5PQZ9W9zt

    As for Auschwitz numbers going down from 4 million to 1 million, people say the Western estimates were never based on those Soviet figures.

    http://www.nizkor.org/faqs/auschwitz/auschwitz-faq-09.html

  236. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wally

    “To repeat, per your absurdly alleged immense shootings…”

    Do try to improve your reading comprehension. I cited claims made by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and by Raul Hillberg. I made no claims of my own.

    • Replies: @Wally
  237. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mike P

    It’s in the library of Congress the Dewey numbers are D810 H4 W48.

    And it and all his books are in Hebrew. birth & death are 1904 to 1957

    • Replies: @Mike P
  238. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Himmler was a psychopath and the mass-killing of Jews happened for sure.

    But much of the Hollywood and Mass Media coverage of the tragedy is more schmolocaust than holocaust.

    I don’t find it difficult to believe the holocaust happened because similar things happened all over. Turks and Greeks butchered one another. Armenians got slaughtered. Stalin killed million. US dropped two nukes on Japan and was ready to drop 1o or 12 more. Japan went on a bloody rampage in China. Khmer Rouge were psycho. Hussein killed 100,000s. Rwanda was a horror. US mass bombing of Korean and Vietnam were mostly targeted at civilians.

    There were ‘death squads’ used by right-wing regimes in Latin America to terrorize and wipe out entire villages that might be supportive of Marxists. The failed coup in Indonesia in 65 led to anti-communist bloodbath and many Chinese got killed.
    So, it hardly seems surprising that Germany under Hitler and psychopaths like Himmler were capable of carrying out horrors.

    Still, so much of the discussion on the Holocaust isn’t history but propaganda and neo-religion.
    And because rational discussion of the Holocaust isn’t allowed, the ones who tend to be daring enough to counter the narrative happen to be lunatics who are just as nutty as Lipstadt. The difference Lipstadts of the world have all the cards. Still, BS is BS and a lot of Deniers are begin from “I hate Jews” and develop their argument from there.

    • Replies: @phil
  239. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rational

    David Irving would beg to differ. He says millions were killed.

    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Turpitz
    , @Turpitz
  240. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    If only it were just ‘denial’ that were prohibited. In many places it’s verboten even to ask impertinent questions, and in some places all questions are deemed impertinent.

    Even worse is that these speech laws even spread to arresting people for jokes and comments unrelated to the Holocaust. So, you can get in trouble for saying insulting things about homos and trannies in much of the EU. After Mandela died, some guy in UK was arrested for a joke.

    It began from silencing deniers of genocide to arresting those guilty of irreverence of the idols of PC, esp Jews, homos, and blacks .

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  241. peterAUS says:
    @Colin Wright

    Up to and including

    …That particular question could do with some dispassionate analysis…

    agree.

  242. lysias says:
    @utu

    Von Manstein only got that name through adoption. He was born von Lewinski, and once said that a great great grandfather of his had been rabbi of Warsaw.

  243. peterAUS says:
    @escobar

    ….Yeah, there is a “Holocaust Industry” and the Holocaust has been used and abused to make money and to excuse evil stuff done by Jews–from Wall Street to Tel Aviv. But the core of the Holocaust “narrative” stands…..

    That sums it all up nicely.
    Balance. So lacking everywhere.
    Makes a good “people watching” exercises. Popcorn overeating too, though.

  244. Wally says:
    @red-ice

    Nope, you are wrong. The Nuremberg Show Trials first.

    You simply ignored:
    - Judge van Roden’s allegation of torture to gain “confessions” is confirmed by Texas Supreme Court Judge, Gordon Simpson. He confirmed that savage beatings, smashing of testicles, and months of solitary confinement occurred. Congressional Record, appendix v. 95, sec.12, 3/10/49

    - U.S. Congressional Representative, Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    ” The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history.”
    Congressional Record, appendix, v.95, sec.14, 6/15/49

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @red-ice
  245. peterAUS says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    …I am against all brainwashing & taboos, but hard-core holo-deniers, whichever their motives, seem to me a bunch of lunatics not worthy to be bothered about.

    Don’t say….

    • Replies: @annamaria
  246. @jorge videla (BGI volunteer)

    why are there no commenters who believe lipstadt and believe it was RIGHT?

    Funny choice of words there. Maybe everyone either read Ron’s assessment and concurred or they googled (duckduckgoed?) “it” and saw this:

    I think Ron could have saved a thousand words by simply inserting the photo. What do you think?

  247. Thank you for challenging the Holocaust lie, my apologies for not reading the article. I’ll probably get back to it later.
    It’s just too depressing when articles like your own never seem to make any difference to the status quo.
    This is the first headline that caught my eye when I opened up my browser start page this morning.

    https://home.nzcity.co.nz/news/article.aspx?id=275163

    I’ve been completely convinced the Holocaust story is a lie for years, yet the news media still put out this nonsense as regular as clockwork. The only mainstream newspaper I’ve come across that has allowed me to freely deny the “Holocaust” has been the London “Independent” I believe it’s Russian owned. They have occasional articles that allow their readers full freedom to comment on “holocaust” matters. A breath of fresh air!

    Other than that it’s just too heavy to let myself get upset at what the bastards are getting away with, It makes me so angry, and I’m getting too old to let myself get upset by what they are doing to our western countries.
    Heres a mostly pictorial site to complement your article that does a very good job at disputing the Holohoax nonsense.

    https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com

  248. Mike P says:
    @Anon

    Thank you! I know someone speaking Hebrew, maybe I can get them interested.

    • Replies: @Anon
  249. Wally says:
    @syonredux

    Read what I posted.

    Yes, people have questioned the authenticity of this ‘letter’.

    There is no real German document for this, and that is the case with so much of the claimed ‘documentation’ that simply hasn’t been falsely ‘translated’ into English.
    Crap was just brazenly forged, there’s ton of examples.

    Bring real docs. if you got em.

    http://www.codoh.com

  250. peterAUS says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Good post.
    Especially

    What I do find disquieting in this account of Holocaust denialism is the evidence it provides of punishment of those in both Europe and North America who, having researched the issue, came to conclusions that conflict with the claims of known liars such as Eli Wiesel, and have as a consequence, had their careers and livelihood’s destroyed.

  251. “I think it far more likely than not that the standard Holocaust narrative is at least substantially false, and quite possibly, almost entirely so.”

    Bravo! After spending years researching the subject I’ve come to the same conclusion, and saying it out loud and in public is way overdue.

    My deepest thanks and admiration to Ron Unz for the work he is doing.

  252. Robjil says:
    @Anon

    He was intimidated to say that. Michael Hoffman in this video talks about how Irving was intimidated. Irving was called Agag. Agag was the last survivor of the genocide of the Amalek tribe (men, women, children plus the destruction of their livestock and property) by Israelites. 500 years later there was a descendant of Agag in Persia, his name was Haman and he was an “enemy” of the Jews of Persia . The Jews in Persia massacred Haman, his ten sons and 75000 Persians (men, women and children) who had Haman connections. This is what the “holiday” of Purim is all about. Irving did not want to be part of that “holiday” so he complied with the wishes of our rulers.

    Perhaps this is why the constant “chatter” for Iran to be attacked in our faux free Zpress. Iran is where the first Purim happened. 2003 Purim the attack on Iraq started. 2011 Purim the attack on Libya started. Will the attack on Iran start on 2019 Purim? It seems to be an 8 year cycle for big attacks in the middle east by the Zwest with Purim being the central theme.

    • Replies: @Wade
  253. @unseated

    Point taken. Thanks for the correction.

  254. Wally says:
    @Henry's Cat

    You mean the letter which no one can produce, that’s means you, just make false claims? LOL

    Seriously? Laughable Zionist controlled Wikipedia citation?
    It’s amazing why anyone would cite Wikipedia as a reference for anything which Jews have a special interest in promoting. It’s rather like asking the wolf to guard the chicken coop.

    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet:

    http://www.unz.com/article/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/?highlight=wikipedia

    ‘Hannover’? You mean the guy at CODOH who demolishes the claims of shills like you?
    He’ll take your lunch in a heartbeat. LOL

    Still waiting for your proof of illegal ‘mass shootings’ and the alleged immense human remains that are claimed to be in known locations.

    http://www.codoh.com

  255. anarchyst says:
    @Anon

    Since when did the holocaust become a religion, in which no questioning of holocaust dogma is allowed?
    You, my friend, are deluded..
    Monika Schaefer and Ursula Haverbeck are serving “hard time” in German maximum security prisons for daring to question the holocaust…
    WHY??

  256. Wally says:
    @Anonymous

    Is that why we do not see the alleged ‘debunkings’?
    Talk is cheap and the ADL is certainly all talk.

    per Lipstadt trial:
    It’s claimed that Germans ‘exterminated’ Jews by dumping granules of the pesticide Zyklon-B through four openings / holes or little chimney-like structures that were secured upon the roofs of two gas chambers built alongside crematoriums II & III at Auschwitz/Birkenau.

    photo 1: top of roof of crematorium no. 2Taken January/February 1943 where there are no such ‘little chimneys’ or ‘holes’. Note that the little chimneys are claimed to have been ca. 2 feet high. The snow is ca. 2-3 inches high.
    According to Auschwitz “expert” Robert Jan Van Pelt (who appeared at the Irving/Lipstadt trial), the insertion columns, which were said to protrude out from the roof, were added as an adaptation in August, 1942.

    photo 2: underside of crematorium II, post war:

    Notice no such openings / holes exist in the underside of the roof in crematorium no. II (alleged ‘gas chamber’, there is no indication that these opening / holes were filled in.
    more:

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/controversies/holes/Renk151200.html

    http://www.codoh.com

  257. @Altait

    “I think Ron sometimes treats anti-establishment theories too easily.”

    Maybe. He for ages had that awful “The Ancient Greeks and Romans Were Nordic” on the frontpage, and eventually listed it as a classic to boot.

    “So I don’t find the idea that the Nazis didn’t want Jews gone as much as possible from Germany and were only acting in response to Communism to hold much water.”

    I don’t think that’s what Unz is arguing. He notes how the authors of early Holocaust literature did not acknowledge the Jewish role in communism at all and instead used more elaborate, esoteric explanations:

    “Since all of these Holocaust books almost totally avoid Hitler’s self-declared motive for his anti-Jewish actions, they are forced to desperately search for alternative explanations, seeking clues buried deep within the German past or turning to psychanalytical speculations or perhaps deciding that what they describe as the greatest massacre in all human history was undertaken out of sheer Nazi wickedness.”

    It definitely wasn’t just Communism though. It was also the wildly disproportionate role Jews played in the Weimar Republic and the infamous decadence and political and economic instability that typified it. I doubt this appeared much in their writings either. Jews during the post war period really did achieve an unparalleled degree of economic, cultural and political power throughout Europe (and North America), and it was very much to the detriment of everyone else (kind of like now.)

    • Replies: @CalDre
    , @Colin Wright
  258. Bukowski says:

    The usual smear attached to holocaust revisionists is that they are all “neo Nazis”. Alexander McClelland was an Australian WW2 veteran who served in North Africa and Greece who was captured by the Germans and eventually ended up in Theresienstadt. He became a holocaust revisionist based on what he personally experienced and years of research.

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=4480

    Here is an interview with Alexander McClelland.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1U3oGMQ8iM

  259. Wally says:
    @Altait

    said:
    “But it’s also unquestionable to see that the large Jewish communities that existed in many places in central and Eastern Europe (Though they had themselves exploded in number only recently at the time) were largely gone after the war and it couldn’t be accounted for just by emigration to the US and Israel.”

    Another fake strawman, no one says just “US and Israel”. Jews poured out of Europe after the war. Many did not return to their previous places, so what? Jews went where Jews are, all over the world.

    After the war, many Jews stayed in Europe and many others scattered throughout the world, settling in nearly sixty countries. So it was that in the late 1990s the teams put in charge by Steven Spielberg of gathering survivors’ testimonies had to go to nearly SIXTY different countries to record the said testimonies on video.

    https://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2009/03/alleged-holocaust-of-jews-is-proving.html

    If Jews are so sure that millions of Jews were murdered, then why do they ask such dumb questions like “what happened to them then?
    After all, Jews say ’6M Jews & 5M others’ went to huge mass graves, Jews claim to know the exact locations of these alleged enormous mass graves to this day, yet Jews cannot show us anything.

    see:
    ‘J. Graf and the illogical canard: ‘Where did Jews go then?’ / & more’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8272

    Imagine in a real / legit court of law where someone claims that millions of people were murdered and dumped into mass graves, but then could not produce the claimed mass graves and the alleged contents. They would be laughed out of that court.

    The “Holocau$t Industry” in court:
    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are to this day, … but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    Next time read what has been posted first.

    http://www.codoh.com

  260. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mike P

    You contact the library of Congress and they send you copies. I looked in 8Kos Angelels colleges and LA SF San Jose San Diego public libraries. Nothing Not Stanford

    Five of weissmabdels books are in library of Congress have your friend make sure of the title.
    It’s really so sad even if he exaggerates.
    I knew 5 people who were in the camps. They came to USA and Life resumed

    I found some info about weissmabdel through DuckDuckGo use the full name and check dob and death 1904 1957. His grandson Michael. Is the current Rabbi. It was a whole dynasty of rabbis and their people All gone and lots of Michael Weissmandels

    • Replies: @Mike P
  261. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jorge videla (BGI volunteer)

    Lipstadt’s a well known liar

  262. @Colin Wright

    “It’s also almost comically obvious that the number ‘five million’ was chosen because it’s slightly less than ‘six million’ — there were other victims, but Jews were the biggest victims.”

    In other words, “although millions of others were killed in genocidal actions, the Holocaust is chiefly about Jews.” What Wiesenthal did was, in contrast to “Holocaust Scholars” and such, rather arbitrarily expanded the definition of the Holocaust to include non-Jews who were killed in similar fashions (often times in the same exact camps) for political purposes, but this has never been accepted as the proper definition of the Holocaust by scholars, so it apparently became a popular definition as opposed to those who act as gatekeepers on how it’s defined.

    It’s a really terribly written article that easily leaves the impression Wiesenthal fabricated 5 million extra deaths out of nowhere, when he appended the “traditional” definition of the Holocaust to include other non-Jewish deaths. And the historians interviewed do a terrible job of making this out to not be the case, especially that they aren’t guided by any ethnocentrism in defining the Holocaust as to include only Jews. “Yes, many non-Jews were subjected to genocide, and often in the same locations Jews were, but the Holocaust- the central atrocity of WWII- 100% concerns Jewish deaths.” It’s like they can’t even be really pressed to admit “the Holocaust was one of various genocides in WWII” or something.

    And remember- it didn’t cross a *single* Nazi mind to exterminate all Russians, a group who suffered the highest death toll (in raw numbers) after the Chinese:

    “In fact, he said, the term “genocide” could accurately be applied to the 2 million to 3 million Poles murdered and millions more enslaved by the Nazis. But the mass murder of the Poles, Roma and others should not come under the rubric “Holocaust,” a term that Holocaust historians generally dislike because of its religious connotations but nonetheless have accepted as describing only the annihilation that the Nazis hoped to visit on the Jews.

    “All Jews of the world had to be annihilated,” Bauer said. “That was the intent. There was never an idea in Nazi minds to murder all the Russians.””

    • Replies: @Wally
  263. JoeFour says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “…I just glanced through the article.”

    Very poor form to comment without a serious reading of the article. I’d suggest you go back and do so. You might discover your confidence in the authors you have read has been significantly misplaced.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  264. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wally

    Look, Wally, if someone questions the Holocaust, which they are entirely free to do so far as I am concerned, they need, if they wish to be convincing, to address the arguments of those who claim that the Holocaust did occur. If they fail to do that, then their argument fails. Giving their critics a URL to follow is like saying, “hey, if you don’t agree with me, go do you own research and prove yourself wrong”, which is an idiotic response.

    And the W of O’s father’s war-time weight loss argues rather strongly against your unlikely claim that the concentration camp occupants were as well fed as anyone in Germany.

    • Replies: @Wally
  265. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Read Earl Butz book. He was a professor of chemical Engineering and knew about how to use gas. He says they didn’t use gas and the gas chambers are fake.

    The Germans sent many people from the occupied countries to Germany to work. They sent working age men. Not children, young teens and old people

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @j2
  266. Wally says:
    @bucky

    said:
    “Sure, several million were killed in the context of a war. The lesson should be to not to go war so that such deprivations happen. That actually is Pat Buchanan’s take on it, and he’s got it right. He doesn’t dispute that some sort of mass killing occurred. His take is that if the United States hadn’t entered WWII, the deprivation which led to the killing of Jews and other minorities would not have occurred.”

    ‘Several million killed’? LOL

    Where’s the proof for that? Simple question.

    The “Holocau$t Industry” in court:
    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are to this day, … but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    http://www.codoh.com

  267. JoeFour says:
    @Art

    “Writing and publishing this article is an act of great courage.”

    Yes!

    May God bless and protect Ron Unz and his family!

    • Replies: @Wally
  268. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Johan Meyer

    Oh please, I’ve been hearing pro criminal stuff all my life. You don’t know any criminals do you?

    They like it and they like the life. Did you know bank robbery is just the most fun ever? Go running in, scare everybody run out the adrenaline rush getting away with it. It’s fun

    Go reccomend your book to another brainwashed liberal.

  269. Bukowski says:
    @Colin Wright

    A lot of Russian pows did die but Stalin was happy with that. He considered anyone who surrendered to be a traitor to the USSR and deserved all they got. Hitler offered to treat Soviet prisoners according to the Geneva Convention if Stalin would do the same for captured German troops. The Soviet dictator refused.

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7627

  270. Wally says:
    @CanSpeccy

    IOW, you do NOT have proof for your impossible ‘holocaust’ claims. Very simple.

    I gave you the right place to find those answers, instead you did nothing to answer your own questions.

    My father lost a lot of weight in the war too, he fought in the Pacific.

    Your fake strawman argument is noted:
    No one said that “concentration camp occupants were as well fed as anyone in Germany”, I said as well as German staff in those camps.

    Try reading what I post.

    Cheers.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  271. @Colin Wright

    As so often, the whole field could do with some exact and disciplined inquiry. I’ve little patience with outright Holocaust Denial, but stuff such as Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners is almost equally useless.

    Please, read the two works I cited above. They summarize the arguments from the best sources on each side. They will spring board you into the most technical aspects of the debate.

    There is no shortage of intellectual rigor on the Revisionist side.

    On the other side, it’s more like rigor mortis.

  272. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Anon

    Anatoly Karlin just reacted and replied to Mr. Unz’s article:

    Holocaust Exegesis

    There were 3,028,538 Jews in the USSR according to the 1939 Census, but only 2,266,334 in the 1959 one (despite the demographic catastrophe of WW2, even the ethnic Russian population expanded by 15% between these two dates); this was also before the start of Soviet Jewish emigration to the West. Where did they go?

    http://www.unz.com/akarlin/holocaust/

    I commented about this here, in great detail:

    The real number of Jews in the former USSR

    https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=233955 Archived link: http://archive.is/rx9gi
    [...]
    Here the original in Russian: http://tavrio.ru/index.php/politics/nazpol/42-skolko-evreev-pf Archived link: http://archive.is/EDYeZ
    [...]
    “All demographers are wrong. In Russia, there are significantly more Jews than there are specialists.”
    [...]
    The number of Jews in different places is two to three times greater than what is indicated in the census data. In Russia, this coefficient is from 2 to 3. And this despite the fact that Jews do not belong to groups with high birth rates. And despite the fact that many are leaving, and the community is aging.
    [...]
    So all the tragic predictions about the extinction and disappearance of the Russian Jewish community are greatly exaggerated. The official estimate of the Jewish population of Russia today is four hundred thousand. But it’s funny. Look around! Take the Russian Jewish encyclopedia and make a selection of contemporary politicians. Will you find among them someone who, being a Jew, is recorded as such in the passport? Hardly

    https://www.unz.com/article/against-david-irvings-view-of-hitler/#comment-2394694

    This is the explanation, in my opinion and according to my research:

    Maybe instead of dying they just changed status, i.e. they (were made to) register(ed) as just Russians instead of (Soviet Union) Jews
    [...]
    the greater part of the decline being attributable to internal processes.
    [...]
    Data on the offspring of mixed couples in the Soviet Union show that they tended formally to affiliate with the nationality of the non-Jewish parent. Unlike passport data, which could not be changed, declarations of nationality in the census were variable and unverified.

    https://www.unz.com/article/against-david-irvings-view-of-hitler/#comment-2394826

    If I understand these Soviet registration processes and practices properly, depending on whether the extra 2 million Jews that became part of the Soviet Union after those annexations had one or two Jewish parents, they would either be registered/issued a passport stating they were Jewish (two Jewish parents) or Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian, Polish, Romanian (one Jewish parent) by Soviet authorities.

    If these Jewish populations had even higher intermarriage rates than Russian Jews, which likely could be the case, easily 40% to 50% of the “new” Soviet Jews could “disappear” due to the Soviet passport registration process. Alternatively instead of 2 million extra Jews, it was actually 4 million Jews (one or two Jewish parents) that were added to the Soviet Union through these annexations, but only 2 million (two Jewish parents) were registered as Jewish and the other 2 million (one Jewish parent) were registered as Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian, Polish or Romanian.

    https://www.unz.com/article/against-david-irvings-view-of-hitler/#comment-2394910

    The Sanning book Epilogue by Germar Rudolf makes a similar point:

    All of the following reasons why the number of Jews in a country could have been reduced were simply lumped together as German Holocaust victims:
    [...]
    Jews not statistically registered or identified as Jews today – p. 207 “Walter N. Sanning: The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry 2nd edition” http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=29

    • Replies: @FKA Max
    , @Wally
    , @j2
  273. @Anon

    He specifically says “Die Judenevakuierung” – “The Jew-evacuation”. In other words, military lingo for deportation. The Holocaust-promoters who put up this speech have then translated the word “Ausrottung” into “extermination” to give the impression that Himmler is using an euphemism, but “Ausrottung” doesn’t have to imply killing. Himmler then goes on to say that this deportation of Jews (“Judenevakuierung”) has caused a lot of dead Jews, but that is not in dispute.

  274. Wally says:
    @JoeFour

    Why do ignore the many before Unz which have put their asses on the line, were imprisoned, physically attacked, house fire bombed, driven from their jobs, persecuted, stalked, on & on.

    They published the very stuff that Ron Unz is merely reacting to.

    Ron deserves praise, no doubt, but he’s just the messenger.

    It’s men like Germar Rudolf, Bradley Smith, Dr. Robert Faurisson, Juergen Graf, Carlo Mattogno, Ernst Zundel. Joseph Bellinger, etc., etc., that deserve the blessings.

    Anyway, welcome aboard. Cheers.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @JoeFour
  275. geokat62 says:
    @Johnny Rottenborough

    Ron Unz, the greatest Athenian of our time.

    To the goyim, Ron is an Athenian. To the Jews, he’s a Hellenizer.

  276. @Anonymous

    it has become a treasured little pleasure of mine to read through a new one on my Monday commute

    I hope you position yourself with your back to a bulkhead – being observed reading material like this on an American public conveyance would raise even greater risk that that faced by people doing algebra on airplanes.

    It might not be as big a risk for thee, as for me. As the song goes…

    “My eyes are dim, I cannot see,
    My browser font’s at 23,
    My brow-ser fo-ont’s a-at twen-tee-three”

    Note to 5-Eyes: I fully support and endorse the practice of delaying flights in the event that a dusky, curly-haired person is caught doing sums with foreign squiggles in them. After all, right-thinkers know – or ought to suspect – that algebra is a Muzzie invention… al-jabr sounds bad enough (it might be a leader of ISIS or something) but worse still, it means re-union of broken parts‘… parts of a bomb or a terrorist cell, perhaps?

    STOP RESISTING.

  277. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    You wouldn’t usually miss the point that I was just objecting to blathering lack of substance. However your last point overlooks the serious question as to why women, children and the elderly were transported a long way from home unless you are willing to try and make a case that it was, even after Stalingrad, a resource consuming part of resettlement plans which I suggested above and poured doubt on. Of course they weren’t transported to Germany, or anywhere, as labour.

    • Replies: @Anon
  278. FKA Max says: • Website
    @FKA Max

    More confirmation from the NY Times, Wikipedia and Foreign Affairs in this comment:

    In the Soviet Union, when someone with parents of two nationalities received identity papers at age 16, he could pick which nationality to list. A child of a Jewish father and non-Jewish mother could put down “Jew [or not].” The religious principle of matrilineal descent was irrelevant.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/02/magazine/02jewishness-t.html
    [...]
    As of 1 December 1941 the release of Polish nationals no longer included members of prewar minorities. All Polish Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Jews were considered Soviet and excluded from the amnesty.
    [...]
    In 1959, for the first time, they were allowed to volunteer, without proof, the nationality with which they chose to be identified. Despite the possibility thus provided for Jews to “pass,” 2,268,000 people specified their nationality as Jewish (there are reasons to believe that the total number more closely approximates 3,000,000).

    https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/1963-01-01/status-jews-soviet-union

    https://www.unz.com/article/against-david-irvings-view-of-hitler/#comment-2395070

  279. Wally says:
    @Unstremian

    said:
    ““In fact, he said, the term “genocide” could accurately be applied to the 2 million to 3 million Poles murdered and millions more enslaved by the Nazis. But the mass murder of the Poles, Roma and others should not come under the rubric “Holocaust,” a term that Holocaust historians generally dislike because of its religious connotations but nonetheless have accepted as describing only the annihilation that the Nazis hoped to visit on the Jews.
    “All Jews of the world had to be annihilated,” Bauer said. “That was the intent. There was never an idea in Nazi minds to murder all the Russians.””

    LOL
    There were no “2 million to 3 million Poles murdered and millions more enslaved by the Nazis.”
    Nor were Roma killed. You simply have no proof. It’s a simple as that.

    The Germans in WWII did nothing different than what the Allies and countries worldwide did.
    Ask Japanese-Americans who were enslaved in US concentration camps.
    Ask those enslaved in the Soviet gulags.

    If “all the Jews had to be annihilated” then why are there ca, 1,000,000 “survivors”?

    Why are there no immense humans that are alleged in allegedly known locations?

    This is incredibly easy.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Unstremian
  280. red-ice says:
    @Wally

    You are mixing up trials. The latter quote in your post clearly refers to Nuremberg.

    The first doesn’t – it refers to Dachau (Landsberg) trials.

    Uninterrupted section from The High Cost of Vengance;

    Colonel Everett’s action, nevertheless, forced the Army to take notice, and Secretary Royall appointed a commission to investigate his charges. This commission, sent to Germany in 1948, consisted of Judge Edward Leroy van Roden, of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, and Justice Gordon Simpson, of the Texas Supreme Court.

    The report made by these two American judges following their investigation, like so many other reports pertaining to Germany, has been kept secret from the American public. But Judge van Roden, after his return to the United States, gave a series of lectures and after-dinner speeches in which he stated that such third-degree methods as the following were used to obtain the conviction of the Germans condemned to death, many of whom have already been hung:

    ▲▼Beatings and brutal kickings; knocking-out of teeth and breaking of jaws; mock trials; solitary confinement; torture with burning splinters; the use of investigators pretending to be priests; starvation; and promises of acquittal. Speaking to the Chester Pike Rotary Club on December 14, 1948, Judge van Roden said: “All but two of the Germans in the 139 cases we investigated had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operating procedure with our American investigators.”

    http://www.unz.com/book/freda_utley__the-high-cost-of-vengeance/#p_8_18

    Freda Utley has separate chapter about the Nuremberg trials and while her description matches what Lawrence H. Smith of Wisconsin said:
    ” The Nuremberg Trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history.”

    The horrible torture described above didn’t happen there.

    I find it very serious to spread such in-accurate information about the infamous Nuremberg trials. They were bad enough without any exaggeration.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wizard of Oz
  281. Wally says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    And I commended Ron Unz for it. And will continue to do so.

    But Unz is really just a messenger. And we need them all, no doubt about it.

    But just watch as the scam breaks, it’s Jews who will be falsely praised as the ‘cutting edge, brave pioneers’.

    It’s those that I have mentioned and many more who have done the real work, the heavy lifting.

    Welcome aboard.

    http://www.codoh.com

  282. renfro says:
    @Art

    Jews have squandered their legacy of pity. Except for some Zionist Christians, good will is vanishing

    Agree

  283. Wally says:
    @Twinkie

    Mich’s mother was not a Jew, she married one after Milch’s birth.

    Be careful of Wikipedia lies. When it comes to any topic that is known to be of special financial & political interests to supremacist Jews, and certainly there is no cash cow & political tool quite like the ‘holocau$t’ scam, you can bet the fix will be in. To them truth is irrelevant.

    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet: http://www.unz.com/article/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/?highlight=wikipedia

    See the facts about Emil Maurice here:
    German Nationalist Jews During the Weimar and Early Third Reich Eras, by Kerry R. Bolton:

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3215/?lang=en

    http://www.codoh.com

  284. renfro says:
    @Anon

    good info……thanks

  285. Wally says:
    @CanSpeccy

    You said:
    “In evaluating the evidence of the Holocaust, some comment on Solzhenitsyn’s claim, which seem to corroborate Hilberg’s conclusion that most killings of Jewish civilians during WW2 were by open-air shootings in Eastern Europe, would have been of interest. Solzhenitsyn’s numbers more or less match Hilberg’s, so are we to suppose that both a life-long Jewish scholar of the Holocaust and a Nobel Prize winning novelist are both completely deluded? If not, how can the Holocaust, i.e, the direct or instigated murder of millions of Jews by the Nazis be so easily dismissed?”

    My points stand. Obviously you’re now in full retreat mode. Good.

    All Revisionists are former Believers.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  286. Wally says:
    @red-ice

    They said what they said.

    Yes their was torture for the Dachau trials and the Frankfurt trials.

    recommended:
    From the Records of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, Part 3, by Germar Rudolf : https://codoh.com/library/document/1492/?lang=en
    and:
    From the Records of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, Part 2, by Germar Rudolf : https://codoh.com/library/document/1471/?lang=en

    said:
    “I find it very serious to spread such in-accurate information about the infamous Nuremberg trials. They were bad enough without any exaggeration.”
    Yawn. As if you can do anything to elevate Nuremberg, here’s more torture:

    - “The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to [Bernard] Clarke the blows and screams were endless. Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: ‘Call them off, unless you want to take back a corpse.’”(12)
    12.R. Butler, Legions of Death, Hamlyn, (London, 1983), p.237

    - The admission of Bernard Clarke was corroborated by Mr. Ken Jones in ‘The Wrexham Leader’, October 17, 1986.
    Mr. Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery stationed at Heid in Schleswig-Holstein.
    “They brought him to us when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activites during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks,” recalls Mr. Jones. Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Hoess in his cell to help break him down for interrogation.”
    “We sat in the cell with him, night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance,” said Mr. Jones.
    When Hoess was taken out for exercise, he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights without sleep, Hoess finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities.

    • Replies: @red-ice
    , @Andrew E. Mathis
  287. RudyM says:

    When my older brother went to Northeast High School in Philadelphia, during the 70′s (probably late 70′s), he took a Communications class which featured guest visits from exponents of controversial viewpoints, including, yes, a Holocaust denier. I have trouble imagining something like that being allowed to happen today. (The teacher was Jewish, incidentally.)

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  288. tac says:

    “If anyone thought that Holocaust denial was a marginal phenomenon among a few Talmudic Jews and Gentile haters, evidence is emerging that it is a much wider, more well-established and dangerous phenomenon that is receiving reinforcement on the ground from the United States and European countries. There is a disturbing trend that suggests Jewish genocide against Europe’s Christian nationalities is being ignored by Western mainstream media and the educational system.”

    http://renegadetribune.com/holocaust-denial-in-europe/

    ‘The Chekist’ 1992 Russian movie w/ English subtitles 1.5 hrs

  289. Wally says:
    @FKA Max

    “Anatoly Karlin just reacted and replied to Mr. Unz’s article:”

    The same Karlin who bans Revisionist posts from his comments section. What a faker he is

    Besides the claim that Jews went to immense mass graves which do not exist, we have more on ‘where Jews went’.

    Jews evacuated to USSR during war: https://archive.is/jA9iI
    and:
    more Jews evacuated to USSR during war: https://www.jta.org/1944/02/23/archive/german-lauds-russia-for-joining-intergovernmental-committee-for-refugees
    exc.:
    “Since the outbreak of the war hundreds of thousands of Jews from Poland, Rumania and the Baltic countries have been given shelter in the U.S.S.R., and many of them were permitted to pass through Russia en route to the United States and to Palestine.”

    http://www.codoh.com

  290. @Anon

    ‘…If only it were just ‘denial’ that were prohibited. In many places it’s verboten even to ask impertinent questions, and in some places all questions are deemed impertinent.

    Even worse is that these speech laws even spread to arresting people for jokes and comments unrelated to the Holocaust. So, you can get in trouble for saying insulting things about homos and trannies in much of the EU. After Mandela died, some guy in UK was arrested for a joke.

    It began from silencing deniers of genocide to arresting those guilty of irreverence of the idols of PC, esp Jews, homos, and blacks .’

    What’s decidedly ironic is that if you look up the actual conditions that obtained in Nazi Germany, the level of free speech Germans could permit themselves in 1933-1945 is getting to be not all that distinct from what we can still permit ourselves.

    We can still speak our minds on this site, and people who are retired like yours truly can pretty much let fly — but a lot of people in a lot of situations no longer can, or fear to, or just censor their thoughts before they’re even formed. Conversely, in 1933-1945, you really could get away with the odd joke, and even if you pushed your luck, the usual outcome was a brief interview with no penalty if the Gestapo concluded you weren’t a serious threat.

    How different is that from here? We still have freedom of speech, in theory — except for ‘hate speech,’ of course. Then it’s possible you may be fired from your job, or lose tenure, or suddenly become unpublishable if you go too far.

    But you can say what you want. It’s not like Nazi Germany.

  291. @RudyM

    ‘When my older brother went to Northeast High School in Philadelphia, during the 70′s (probably late 70′s), he took a Communications class which featured guest visits from exponents of controversial viewpoints, including, yes, a Holocaust denier. I have trouble imagining something like that being allowed to happen today. (The teacher was Jewish, incidentally.)’

    Yeah. My thought exactly. The times, they are a changin.’

    Unz mentioned reading something back in the seventies as well. Back in the day, Holocaust Denial wasn’t taken seriously — but if you wanted to espouse it, you were free to do so, more or less without let or hindrance.

    It was like thinking the moon landings were faked. Have at it; it’s not a crime.

  292. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wally

    you do NOT have proof for your impossible ‘holocaust’ claims. Very simple.

    Wally, you seem to be seriously challenged in the comprehension of the English language. I made no “holocaust” claims.

    I said anyone who wishes to argue that there was no Holocaust might reasonably be expected to address the claims to the contrary made by Raul Hilberg and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. Of course no one is obliged to argue anything at all, but then someone who won’t debate among the most notable proponents of the position they seek to debunk seems unlikely to convince many people of validity of their position.

    I spent the best part of an hour reading Ron Unz’s article and came away from it with the belief that it proves nothing concerning the occurrence or otherwise of the murder of several million Jews by the Nazis. But that does not mean that having wasted one hour on the subject that I now want to spend many further hours on the subject in order to become some kind of Holocaust researcher. I don’t.

    • Replies: @Wally
  293. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wally

    My points stand.

    Yes, your pointless points stand.

    My point concerned the article by Ron Unz, not your points, yet to be made, i.e., a URL to a website I have no interest in exploring because life is short and the Holocaust is not a topic that I wish to research.

    • Replies: @Wally
  294. @Stan d Mute

    Perhaps they can sue for damages?
    In an American court, no less?

  295. @CanSpeccy

    ‘…What I do find disquieting in this account of Holocaust denialism is the evidence it provides of punishment of those in both Europe and North America who, having researched the issue, came to conclusions that conflict with the claims of known liars such as Eli Wiesel, and have as a consequence, had their careers and livelihood’s destroyed. So much for American leadership of the Free World.’

    This ties in with Gilad Atzmon’s observation that the Holocaust has ceased to become a subject for historical analysis, but rather, has become a religious truth.

    I can advance more or less any idea I wish to on a historical question without fear. If I choose to, I can argue that the ‘Black Death’ wasn’t a single disease at all, but rather a cluster of unrelated epidemics. Many may disagree, and they probably can even convincingly refute me if they try hard enough, but I can advance the hypothesis. No one objects.

    That’s what occurs with historical questions. But the Holocaust has ceased to be a historical question; rather, it has taken on some of the characteristics of religious ‘truth.’ You can no more question the Holocaust in Paris than you could doubt the authenticity of Mohammed’s revelation in Mecca.

    • Replies: @CalDre
    , @utu
    , @jilles dykstra
  296. red-ice says:
    @Wally

    The error I pointed out is obvious. The good Judge wasn’t investigating the civil Nuremberg trials. He was investigating Dachau, closed military trials. The horrible torture he describes, including broken jaws and crushed testicles happened there.

    If you don’t see the difference and the significance of this you should probably find another hobby.

    • Replies: @Wally
  297. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    It was my point that only working age men from the occupied countries were sent to Germany as labor. That only Jewish old people children and women were sent. That was the point.

    • Replies: @j2
  298. S says:

    The excerpted article below entitled ‘Our Israelitish Brethren’ appeared in an October, 1870 edition of the highly influential journal Atlantic Monthly which was then being published in Boston, Massachusetts. Boston has historically been a major power center of both the Anglo-Saxon and Jewish peoples in the United States as well as that of Freemasonry. The journal, now known as The Atlantic, remains quite influential and is based at present in Washington D.C.

    The title of the article ‘Our Israelitish Brethren’ would translate into more modern English as ‘Our Jewish Brothers’.

    The author of the article was one James Parton, a person with a seemingly Anglo-Saxon name, a name not dissimilar in origin to the bulk of the US population at the time. One might wonder what might have prompted Parton to write an article so entitled, rather than one entitled ‘Our Germanic Brethren’ in regards to, say, Germany, as after all that’s where the Anglo-Saxons had originated.

    An explanation for this likely lies in the long term dysfunctional relationship which has existed between the Jewish and Anglo-Saxon people, a relationship which is ultimately harmful, destructive, and unhealthy for both peoples.

    Reflective of that unhealthy relationship has been the historically unfortunate (and absurd) adoption by powerful elements of the Anglo-Saxon elites and hangers on of British Israelism (aka Anglo-Israelism & American Israelism), the belief being basically that the Anglo-Saxon people are of the ‘Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, rather than being from the forests of northern Europe.

    During the 20th century the ideology of British Israelism has been believed ‘without a doubt’ by First Sea Lord Admiral Fisher, King George VI, and even now it’s said by Queen Elizabeth II, amongst others.

    George VI (then Duke of York) wrote in 1922 that:

    “I am sure the British Israelite business is true. I have read a lot about it lately and everything no matter how large or small points to our being the chosen race”.

    Getting back to the excerpted article and the initial emboldened quote referring to ‘the huge Andersonville outrages’; this is a reference to the Civil War era Andersonville prison camp maintained in the South to house Union prisoners.

    The prison camps on both sides, North and South, had very poor conditions that resulted in not dissimilarly large numbers of deaths, the South’s situation exacerbated by the strict Union blockade of all food and medicine from entering the Southern states and it’s being in the process of losing the war during the last couple of years of fighting. As the war progressed to its conclusion in 1864-1865 dark rumors began to circulate in the North about the southern camps and the alleged deliberate mass murder of Union prisoners…ie the manufacture of leather wallets from the human skin of ‘murdered’ US prisoners.

    Andersonville, located in Georgia, was the largest of the South’s camps, and thus had a proportionately higher number of deaths in comparison to the other southern camps. As stated, both the North and South’s camps had comparable high death rates due to poor conditions.

    At the conclusion of the Civil War in the Spring of 1865 the United States (Union) due in part out of bitterness due to its great losses incurred began a campaign that by way of a series of trials was to try the entirety of the upper echolons of the political and military leadership of the defeated South (ie Jefferson Davis and his cabinet, General Robert E Lee and his subordinate generals) for ‘crimes against humanity’ allegedly involving the southern camp system, the main southern camp Andersonville with its associated rail depot being the centerpiece of this effort.

    This would be about the same difference as if a terrible car accident were to take place with deaths in both of the vehicles involved, and yet one of these two parties would accuse the other of planned deliberate murder in the accident, get a lawyer, and then seek out the death penalty for the other car’s driver.

    These plans fell through, and the US rather than looking towards itself to explain and help it to understand the disaster of the war, would instead try the solitary hapless Henry Wirz, the commanding officer at Andersonville, as a scapegoat to satiate its desire for vengeance.

    Wirz was placed on trial under the auspices of a military tribunal and would be accused of many horrible things, ie the random shooting down of prisoners with his personal pistol for sport, the setting of ferocious and large dogs upon the men, deaths resulting from the deliberate poisoning of great masses of the men disguised as health measures (measures at Andersonville such as vaccination against disease to protect and preserve the lives of prisoners were turned upside down on their face and declared by the United States to have been in reality ‘poisonous injections’), the planned ‘systematic’ murder of many thousands more of the men through their deliberate starvation, etc.

    Henry Wirz after a months long trial would be convicted on the basis of these accusations and hung in Washington D.C. on November 10, 1865.

    After the war, the Union General and amateur painter Lew Wallace whom was the presiding judge over the case against Wirz, would paint a scene of a Union prisoner at Andersonville shot down as he crossed a ‘deadline’ (something all the camps, North and South, had) to obtain a drink of water from a stream. The painting was entitled ‘Over the Deadline’ and would go on tour across the North multiple times in the years after the war. The Boston Advertiser declared the painting to be ‘horribly realistic’.

    Wallace would also be the author in 1880 of the novel (and later 1959 movie) Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ about a Jewish prince (Judah Ben-Hur) whom after being enslaved by the Romans and then freed, ultimatey converts to Christ.

    For decades after the war the corporate national media of the day would harangue southerners about ‘the camps’, the ‘cattle cars’, the ‘poisonous injections’, the allegedly planned ‘systematic’ mass murder thru deliberate starvation, and the ‘slaughter pens’, the latter being the 19th century term for slaughter house, and in the context of the accusation the equivelant of ‘death camps’, places designed so that living beings enter and none leave alive.

    During these years songs were published in the north containing the phrase ‘Never Forget’ in regards to Andersonville. Mixed in amongst these many accusatory articles after the war would be the occassional rare US establishment journal which acknowedged that it was the Union’s own strict food and medicine blockade of the South which had been largely responsible for the condition of Andersonville and the other southern camps at the end of the war.

    All the quoted phrases here can be found when doing a patient search of the term ‘Andersonville’ at the multiple sites on line containing cached post Civil War 19th century US journals.

    For whatever reason in about 1900 the incessant accusations about the southern camps stopped appearing in the US media.

    One thing though, the accusations against Wirz regarding Andersonville which resulted in his being hanged as well as the accusations regarding the other Southern camps are now almost universally, though not too loudly, acknowledged to have been wholly untrue. And that Henry Wirz had been scapegoated out of Union picque about a war which had cost both themselves and the South hundreds of thousands of lives.

    Why the fraudulent accusations then? It would seem first and foremost they serve as a negative means of social control of the people from which the accusations eminate from… eminating from and aimed broadly in this case at the Civil War era Anglo-Saxon general public of the US (Union), but more importantly targeting the largely Anglo-Saxon Union troops fighting at the front, ie ‘You had better fight hard, very hard, resisting in every possible way, and not even think of surrendering…lest you too should wind up in one of those places. A powerful secondary reason is the demonization of a declared enemy.

    The US (Union) rather than ultimately making fraudulent accusations would have done better to have looked towards itself early on and examined its own motivations for pursuing war, and perhaps have decided against prosecuting a war with the South.

    [MORE]

    One of these lesser known powerful motivations for war being the North’s monetization of chattel slavery and its trade via its adoption of the much more profitable and efficient wage slavery (ie the cheap labor/mass immigration system then being promoted globally by the British Empire) and its desire to force this same system upon a recalcitrant South..

    ..a South whose inefficient and costly chattel slavery was producing expensive cotton to feed northern textile mills, and thus affecting their bottom line and ability to compete. Regarding this see the 1840-1850′s financing and construction by the powerful New England Lawrence family of textile magnates of first Lawrence ‘Immigrant City’, Massachusetts and then its sister city of Lawrence, Kansas, the latter being at the center of vicious fighting in contested ‘Bleeding Kansas’ between guerilla armies privately financed by New England industrialists and Southern plantation owners.

    One other lesser known major motivation for war no doubt being the powers that be having since its founding designated the United States a model for the other continents of the world of the unified continental super state, these continents some day to join together to form the future New Rome/United States of the World, and it wouldn’t do to have this model continental super-state split asunder down the middle indefinately.

    (I say all this within the context of my personal belief that in 1861 when violence became unavoidable that rather than turning the guns upon each other the guns should have been turned upon the slavery addicted and corrupted elites and hangers on of the North and South with their respective competing wage and chattel slavery systems.

    These systems of slavery had resulted in the displacement of their own Anglo-Saxon people in Massachusetts and South Carolina, and the same process was well under way in 1860 via the backdoor of the state of California with the importation by diktat of tens of thousands of wage slaves from China.

    Most I think would have readily surrendered where they then could of been replaced in positions of authority by people whom had not been involved in either wage or chattel slavery. A true abolition of slavery, both chattel and wage, could of then taken place, followed by self determination for both the former African slave and European, each with plenty of reasons to go their own way.)

    In lieu of the North not having done that self examination first, and perhaps declining to pursue war in 1861, but rather instead choosing to make costly and needless war upon the South, followed up with angry fraudulent accusations, one can only surmise that:

    When a moral cause is dubious it is sometimes necessary to augment it with something…anything.

    ‘Of the giant wrongs to which they [the Jewish people] have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded.’

    Atlantic Monthly (October, 1870) – Our Israelitish Brethren

    ‘Who can estimate the reparation which Christendom owes this interesting and unoffending people? How abundant, how untiring, should be our charity in judging the faults of character which our own superstition has created or developed!

    Of the giant wrongs to which they have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded. In the slaughter of the Jews of Seville, in 1391, thirty-five hundred families were murdered. In 1492, under Ferdinand and Isabella, three hundred thousand heroic Israelites preferred exile to apostasy.

    Many of them found a resting-place only in the grave or in the depths of the sea; for neither Portugal nor Italy nor Mohammedan Morocco would tolerate the presence of a people who would not comply with their superstitions, and who, by their frugality, continence, temperance, and industry, absorbed the wealth of every country in which they lived. Those who remained in the Peninsula suffered baptism, and were obliged to conform to the outward observances of the reigning church.

    Far more enviable was the lot of those who had accepted banishment. The favorite office of the Spanish Inquisition for two centuries was to “question” the sincerity of those two hundred thousand Jewish converts; and the national amusement was to witness the burning of Jewish Rabbis and Jewish maidens. Similar atrocities were committed, as we all know, in England, Germany, and France.’

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Israelism

    https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/British_Israelism

    http://www.britishisrael.co.uk

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1870/10/our-israelitish-brethren/306257/

    http://wallacestudy.blogspot.com/2011/02/art-of-lew-wallace-over-deadline.html?m=1

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben-Hur:_A_Tale_of_the_Christ

    • Replies: @S
  299. CalDre says:
    @phil

    It would be helpful if Putin would do more to make Soviet-era archives available

    Putin closed the archives and he has made Holocaust Denial a very serious crime in the Russian Federation.

    Don’t put your hopes in that Globalist.

    • Replies: @Wally
  300. tac says:
    @trupright

    Yet the Western countries continue to pay ….

    Jewish holocau$$$t extortionist$$$ busy expanding ever growing racket:

    “Holocaust profiteering by literary hoax is widespread. “Holocaust profiteers” is the term originally coined on the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal. The anatomy of “Holocaust profiteering” was made clear by the Reuters Agency when it reported from Buenos Aires, Argentina on Friday, 19, April 1996 (14:50:17 PDT) on a meeting of the World Jewish Congres Rabbi Israel Singer, General Secretary of the World Jewish Congress stated that “More than three million Jews died in Poland and the Polish people are not going to be the heirs of the Polish Jews.  We are never going to allow this. (…) They’re gonna hear from us until Poland freezes over again.  If Poland does not satisfy Jewish claims it will be “publicly attacked and humiliated” in the international forum.”

    http://www.pogonowski.com/?p=2411

    Holocaust survivors’ grandchildren call for action over inherited trauma

    “Jewish activists in Scotland have started a campaign to support the grandchildren of Holocaust survivors across the world, saying the trauma of the extermination camps continues to haunt the descendants of those who suffered there.

    Dan Glass, 29, from London, said he heard constant tales of the Holocaust as he grew up, which have deeply affected him into adulthood.

    “All four of my grandparents narrowly avoided the gas chambers in Auschwitz and countless of their friends met with this fate. For my father it was a daily conversation in my teens and early 20s and even though I very profoundly understood his pain, one day I had to say to him, ‘Dad, I can’t talk about this anymore.’ My father had a whole wall of books on the subject of the Holocaust – it was all he wanted to talk about, but it was so harrowing for me.””

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/03/holocaust-survivors-grandchildren-inherited-trauma

    “The organization that handles claims on behalf of Jews who suffered under the Nazis says Germany has agreed to pay another 75 million euros ($88 million) to fund social welfare services for Holocaust survivors.

    The New York-based Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany said Tuesday the additional money brings total funding next year to 480 million euros ($560 million), to help survivors as they grow older and more frail.
    [...]
    Germany also agreed to increase pensions paid to 55,000 Holocaust survivors in Central and Eastern Europe, and expand eligibility for child survivors.”

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/germany-agrees-to-88-million-more-for-holocaust-survivors/

    “We call it the ‘Hoaxoco$t’ because it is a hoax, and it costs plenty. In addition to the jillions of dollars already paid out, directly or indirectly, in cash, goods, and services to Hoaxoco$t ‘survivors’ and the racketeer state of Israel since 1945, with new, improved ‘Hoaxoco$t survivor’ rip-offs, shake-downs, protection rackets, extortion rackets, blackmail schemes, and related swindles being invented and refined almost every week; one would need a computer to calculate the number of unprovoked ‘air strikes’, invasions, bombings, burnings, sinkings, shellings, confiscations, expulsions, tortures, book-burnings, beatings, arrests and detentions, both with and without trial, all caused by the insane delusion that we are fighting ‘Hitler’ every five seconds, in the need to prevent yet another ‘Hoaxoco$t’(for the umpteenth time).”

    https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Carlos_W._Porter

  301. CalDre says:
    @Colin Wright

    This was the great point made by the brave Ahmedinijad some years ago:

    They have fabricated a legend under the name Massacre of the Jews, and they hold it higher than God himself, religion itself and the prophets themselves.

    If somebody in their country questions God, nobody says anything, but if somebody denies the myth of the massacre of Jews, the Zionist loudspeakers and the governments in the pay of Zionism will start to scream.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/archive/2005/12/200849154418141136.html

  302. utu says:
    @Colin Wright

    I can advance more or less any idea I wish to on a historical question without fear. If I choose to, I can argue that the ‘Black Death’ wasn’t a single disease at all, but rather a cluster of unrelated epidemics. Many may disagree, and they probably can even convincingly refute me if they try hard enough, but I can advance the hypothesis. No one objects.

    But not if you try to advance a hypothesis that some of the epidemics were spread by Jews.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Anon
  303. CalDre says:
    @Unstremian

    It definitely wasn’t just Communism though. It was also the wildly disproportionate role Jews played in the Weimar Republic and the infamous decadence and political and economic instability that typified it.

    I think it’s pretty clear why Hitler and Nazis wanted to expel Jews from Europe. First there is the Bolshevik issue – and not just the 10s millions murdered in the Soviet Union largely by Jews, but that Jews formed an impressive Fifth Column of Communists throughout Europe. Second was their belief that Jews are greedy, ruthless liars, which finds substantiation of course in Jews’ religious tenets (they are not allowed to lie to each other but lying to non-Jews is kosher so long as it does not invite backlash). Third Jews were very active among the industrial revolts during WW I which paralyzed Germany’s war industry and was responsible for German losses. Fourth Hitler specifically blamed Jews for arranging for the unconditional surrender of Germany in WW I and then for imposing, and profiting from, the Treaty of Versailles. Fifth Nazis understood the virulent Jewish (religious/tribal) antipathy toward Christianity and Western Civilization. Probably some more I forgot but Mein Kampf is not hard to find.

  304. j2 says:
    @Anon

    “The Germans sent many people from the occupied countries to Germany to work. They sent working age men. Not children, young teens and old people”

    They did send children from Poland to Germany to work. I personally know very well a Polish woman, who was taken to Germany to work. She was less than 15 years at that time.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Anon
  305. Wally says:
    @CanSpeccy

    You’re a blatant liar. Your posts speak for themselves.

    You’re getting the crap knocked out of you and you’re now tying to distance yourself from your posts. LOL

    you said:
    “I spent the best part of an hour reading Ron Unz’s article and came away from it with the belief that it proves nothing concerning the occurrence or otherwise of the murder of several million Jews by the Nazis. But that does not mean that having wasted one hour on the subject that I now want to spend many further hours on the subject in order to become some kind of Holocaust researcher. I don’t.”

    So what makes you think that “several million Jews” were “murdered”?

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  306. @Wally

    ‘LOL
    There were no “2 million to 3 million Poles murdered and millions more enslaved by the Nazis.”
    Nor were Roma killed. You simply have no proof. It’s a simple as that.

    The Germans in WWII did nothing different than what the Allies and countries worldwide did.
    Ask Japanese-Americans who were enslaved in US concentration camps.
    Ask those enslaved in the Soviet gulags.

    If “all the Jews had to be annihilated” then why are there ca, 1,000,000 “survivors”?

    Why are there no immense humans that are alleged in allegedly known locations?

    This is incredibly easy.’

    Actually, Wally. Maybe World War Two didn’t happen at all — any of it.

    Can you prove it did? Hmm? Hmm? Wally? Wally?

    You’re right. This is incredibly easy.

  307. @utu

    I largely agree with this, and I’d add that the reason they make ever-expansive laws against holocaust “denial” and “relativization” is because they specifically want all opponents of the narrative of eternal guilt to be associated with denial of the whole thing – that way they could easily claim that all opponents of the narrative are crazy.

    The narrative of eternal guilt has also been pushed to be ever more expansive, it’s not only eternal German guilt, but also eternal Hungarian guilt, eternal French guilt, even eternal Polish guilt (who really didn’t even have many collaborators even on that narrow issue), eternal American guilt and eternal British guilt (needless to say how unhinged that is), eternal guilt of the whole world (especially whites), a debt the world owes to Jews for eternity.

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Anon
  308. Wally says:
    @CanSpeccy

    You said:
    ” If not, how can the Holocaust, i.e, the direct or instigated murder of millions of Jews by the Nazis be so easily dismissed?”

    Yes, they can be “easily dismissed” and in fact it is being dismissed worldwide.

    So where’s you proof for your alleged ‘millions of murdered Jews’?

    You don’t like it and I don’t care, but my points stand, you said what you said. You’ve been busted.

    http://www.codoh.com

  309. j2 says:
    @FKA Max

    Apparently the following is a quote from Anatoly Karlin:
    “There were 3,028,538 Jews in the USSR according to the 1939 Census, but only 2,266,334 in the 1959 one (despite the demographic catastrophe of WW2, even the ethnic Russian population expanded by 15% between these two dates); this was also before the start of Soviet Jewish emigration to the West. Where did they go?”

    The Soviet figure for 1939 is highly in doubt. This time Wikipedia is a reasonable source (as it often, but not always is): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Census_(1937)
    read:
    “The preliminary result of the census (i.e., 1937 census), reported to Stalin in the middle of March 1937, was 162,039,470 people, much lower than the “criminally decreased” registered numbers of 170-172 million or Stalin’s expectation of 180 million people.”
    and:
    “The new Soviet Census (1939) showed a population figure of 170.6 million people, manipulated so as to match exactly the numbers stated by Stalin in his report to the 18th Congress of the All-Union Communist Party. No other censuses were conducted until 1959″.
    Thus, about 8 million people were invented just to make Stalin happy.

    Concerning the Jewish population, the American Jewish Congress yearbook 1939 figures sum to the Soviet Union of 1939 as 2.8 million. This figure includes the three Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) that were annexed to the SU in 1940. They cannot be in the Soviet census of January 17, 1939 and therefore this Jewish figure gives a considerably smaller Jewish population for the SU of 1939.

    This AJC number is still based on Soviet estimates and AJC Yearbook acknowledges that it is highly uncertain. It is very likely to be at least 1 million too large because Jewish immigration to the USA seems to have been 1 million higher than the official figures give between 1921 and 1939. As Soviet census often meant a person going to register with a set of internal passports of his household, we cannot know how many of the passport holders had illegally emigrated. We only know there were so many internal passports.

    A further reduction to the number may be considered because of lowered birth rate, and the size of the Jewish population after the war is also not quite certain. It was given as a round number of 2 million in 1948.

  310. @academic gossip

    The Eden document from July 7 presumably discussed the extermination camp at Auschwitz and possibly the German extermination program more generally. By “science” Churchill is probably talking about gas chambers.

    Presumably, possibly, probably…

    Churchill’s book contains a succint statement of the standard Holocaust account as uniquely exceptional, technologically specialized, state-organized murder of Jews.

    You forgot the “succinct” quote.

  311. Erebus says:
    @utu

    If the Holocaust revisionism is to be taken seriously it must come up with the story for the vanished religious Jews of Poland. But it can’t present a credible story of survival because these Jews indeed died during the WWII while in a custody of German occupying forces.

    You were on a track until you got to “custody of German occupying forces”.

    The Polish Jews were concentrated in the east, and so were in the “custody” of the Red Army in the early stages of the war, and not the Wehrmacht’s. During that time a great many (numbers escape me atm) were evacuated east, deep into the SU. In wartime, a few million could disperse across Eurasia without raising too many eyebrows, but they were noticed.

    They did not show up in America or Argentina or Brazil.

    No, but in addition to the SU, there’s lots of documentation of them showing up in what Timothy Snyder called the Bloodlands.
    The Ukraine, Belarus, Romania and the Baltics saw an orgy of violence as a combination of territorial/political/social vendettas and racial/tribal hatreds were unleashed in what amounted to a war of all against all. Displaced Jews migrating east were targeted by just about everyone. The violence accelerated with Barbarossa, and continued throughout the war, dying out only in the ’50s, when the Soviets finally crushed the last of it in the Ukraine.

    Snyder notwithstanding, the full story of what happened there has yet to be told. We saw the tip of that underlying iceberg of latent hatred in the Mariupol & Odessa massacres, and the targeting of civilians in the Donbas in 2014. I’ve long held that if a Holocaust happened, it happened there.

    Interestingly, the vast majority of the so-called “evidence” of German atrocities presented at the Nuremberg Trials came from the Soviets, and specifically from the Ukraine. One would be forgiven for thinking that its production was politically motivated.

    • Replies: @j2
  312. @JoeFour

    My list of books on the persecutions of the jews is nearly forty books.
    I also saw and participated in many internet discussions, read the reports of chemical analyses in what is presented as gas chambers for humans.
    I therefore just glanced though the article, there is very little I do not know, in my opinion.
    I do not put trust in authors, I compare the writings.
    Butz urges his readers to read one of the ‘standard’ works on the holocaust, I did.
    The great thing about truth is that it is consistent.
    I am at a point of knowledge where I seldom must change a view, but a recent change were the two atomic bombs on Japan, together with the annihilation of the Kwantung army by the USSR the bombs may have saved some 20 million lives.

    • Replies: @byrresheim
  313. @Colin Wright

    ” No doubt the Germans were being beastly to the Jews ”
    Beastly ?
    Ordinary Germans not at all, as jew Klemperer describes.
    The Gestapo was nasty, but no more than that
    Victor Klemperer, ‘I will bear witness, A diary of the Nazi years, 1942-1945’, New York 1999

    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
  314. @Colin Wright

    ” known liars such as Eli Wiesel, ”
    Could not discover any lie in
    Elie Wiesel, ‘La Nuit’, 1958, 2007
    On the contrary, Wiesel confirms Rassinier, Burg, Kogon.
    If this was his intention, I wonder

  315. @Johan Meyer

    I indeed did not read the book, did not even know it.
    About
    Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, ‘Hitler’s gewillige beulen’, Antwerpen 1996 (Hitler’s willing executioners; ordinary Germans and the holocaust, New York 1996)
    I suppose, Goldhagen is an idiot.

    • Replies: @Mike P
    , @Colin Wright
  316. @Anon

    I suppose you know how the story is what had to be done after the asserted killing by an insecticide.
    Anyone using this method would have used cyanide, it kills instantly.
    Saves a lot of time.
    Then about removing the bodies and having them cremated, one by one, as the story goes, then removing the remains.
    Did I have to design a mass killing process for humans, I suppose it is not very difficult to design an efficient installation.
    But I do not want to think about how.

    As to Churchill, in his memoirs, must admit I do not have all ten or eleven volumes in Dutch, seven or so, not a word about extermination of jews.
    Maybe you know that Churchill’s mother was the daughter of a New York banker, whose name may show the banker was a jew.
    Technically then Churchill may have been a jew.
    He supported zionism until 1953, when his life long friend Moyne was killed in Egypt by zionists.

    • Replies: @Anon
  317. Heros says:

    Once again, Ron Unz has bravely broached a taboo, but once again he tries to maintain his plausible deniability to JP by using milquetoast words like “highly likely” or “almost certain”. This is almost as damning as jews having to force draconian holocaust denial and hate speech legislation on their goy slaves across the west in order to prop up their never ending stream of absurd lies. It shows that Ron Unz fears JP, and rightfully so. As a US expat living in exile, I would advise him not to leave the country because CBP may now have him on one of their run away slave lists, and the experience at the border when re-entering ZOG USA can be highly unpleasant Believe me I know.

    If we look at some of the worst cases of jewish psychopaths projecting their own foul and satanic deeds back onto Christians, we have the (((bolshevik))) destruction of Russia, the Holdomor, the Holohoax, Ritual Child Sacrifice, the Palestinian Genocide, and far more, but these 5 Jewish psychopathic crimes against humanity will suffice for my calculations.

    Statistically, the formula for calculating the probability of jews waging genocidal war against the entire planet the way they did the Amaleks would be:

    1-(1-”likelyhood of psycopaths”)^5 = 1-(1-.95)^5 =.99999968

    All these “highly likely” historical events taken together reveal the truth. Calling them the enemy of humanity doesn’t even start to describe the evil that they represent.

  318. Heros says:

    I have stated many times in this AP series that one of the most revealing facts that has come out is the difference in character between the jews and the people whose lives they have attempted to destroy.

    On one side we have Lipstadt, Weisel, and dozens of kvetching Rabbi’s flinging spittle.

    On the other side we have the finest examples of modern Christian chivalry and honor: Irving, Rudolf, Zundel, Faurisson, Haverbeck, Stoll, Schaefer, and even Wally.

    Yes Wally, who day after day keeps plugging away at Hasbara agents and their idiot mind controlled puppets who never manage to string a coherent argument against the evidence he continually presents. These agent idiots just keep spewing the same old drivel: CanSpeccy, PeterAUS, utu, and many others.

    This massive truth schism between jews and gentiles could not be more blatant, and it mirrors all the hate speech and denial legislation that they have used to enslave all of Christianity with.

    Here is a particularly loathsome creature call Barbara Lipstadt in action doing her best to deceive the stupid goyim.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  319. @Ron Unz

    Having visited Birkenau with a Holocaust survivor who only managed to stay alive by being part of a Sonderkommando unit forced to remove bodies from and “disinfect” the gas chambers, the theses of Holocaust deniers seems to me to be rather distasteful.

    Although the number of victims in the gas chambers will surely never be known with certainty, the “evidence” denying the possibility of the chambers themselves appears to be based mainly on the Leuchter report, which claimed to be the first forensic analysis of Auschwitz. This was, of course, not true – and Faurisson’s dismissal (in the introduction to the first Leuchter report) of the forensic examinations carried out in 1945 was entirely too facile.

    Given the state of the crematoria at the time Leuchter carried out his analysis (1988), it seems to me that he could have written most of his report without ever stepping foot in Auschwitz. That he was paid rather handsomely for his “investigation”, presumably by Faurisson and Zundel, doesn’t help vouch for its credibility. You find what you are paid to find (or more properly in this case, you don’t find any evidence that you are paid not to find).

  320. @Wally

    Plenty of prisoners working as forced laborers died because of the conditions, particularly in mines and building underground factories. No doubt in a situation where American and British Pods were almost starved to death, and certainly weakened in resistance to any disease, the calculation for forced labor would be to give them just enough of whatever food was available to keep most of them alive and working balancing that against calculations about finding replacements and the means of transport to bring them to the places of work. But the logic wouldn’t have been very different from that of the slave managers in the WI before 1833. The short term requirements would have meant a lot of the non volunteers compelled to labor hard would have succumbed. Obviously if there was plenty of food around the more skilled workers would be relatively well looked after as long as they were needed. And as you seem to have missed my point was that other things being equal amongst the underfed the Jews would have been in the bottom layer.

    • Replies: @phil
  321. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    Silly stuff. Obviously Germans, including SS guards and managers, who could see the war was lost weren’t going to put in special efforts to keep the killing of Jews going, especially when actual destruction of the camps had been ordered. So the sick who couldn’t walk were no doubt left to (probably) die while in some, though probably not all, parts of large camp complexes prisoners would be coerced into moving West with the guards, while some prisoners would have thought at this stage e.g. “Better the devil we know” or “at least we speak/understand our guard’s language” or “I don’t think Comrade Stalin is going to welcome me nicely”. Human reality is quite complex Wally. Have you ever thought of reasons why the guards might want to have prisoners with them? Think self preservation.

    • Replies: @utu
  322. @Unstremian

    ‘…It definitely wasn’t just Communism though. It was also the wildly disproportionate role Jews played in the Weimar Republic and the infamous decadence and political and economic instability that typified it…

    That’s my suspicion as well. It’s something that conventional historians seem to have been loathe to explore — perhaps it would appear to justify the Nazi reaction and the willingness of so many Germans to embrace it.

    It’s a pity, as psychologically, we seem to be in about the same place today. What’s that about being doomed to repeat something?

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  323. @Felix Krull

    What you say about what cannot be discussed and about the restrictions on legal argument seem so fantastic to me that I would be much obliged by chapter and verse substantiation. BTW hasn’t the inability to have the truth debated in court been taken to the European Court of Human Rights? If so, with what result? If not why not?

  324. @Johnny Smoggins

    “This would be like me setting up a GoFundMe for my cancer treatment and then telling you that actually I just have the flu…….but I’m still sick so I should be able to keep the money.”

    … and we go to jail if we say you have merely the flu rather than cancer.

  325. j2 says:
    @Anon

    “It was my point that only working age men from the occupied countries were sent to Germany as labor. That only Jewish old people children and women were sent. That was the point.”

    You are wrong in this. Jews actually were not sent as labor. They were transferred and had to do forced labor while being transferred. As Jews were transferred, it included all ages. But to forced labor in Germany were sent ethnic Poles and there were quite young among them, under 15. Sent to farm work. I know one who was sent there as a young girl, she is Polish, not Jewish. Poles were also sent to work for German farmers in Poland as forced workers. Germans tried to round-up people and take them to forced labor, I knew one who escaped this fate by hiding, a boy at that time, Polish, not Jewish.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  326. Mike P says:
    @Anon

    Thanks again. It is pretty remarkable that the English version has been completely purged, apparently! I checked abebooks.com and archive.org, too, but nothing.

    • Replies: @Anon
  327. Anon,
    you can continue to ignore that camp inmates died of hunger, because the inmate camp management ate very well.
    Yet Poliakov describes this explicitly for the Warsaw ghetto.
    The description is accompanied by how the jew at the top behaved like a Roman emperor with a court.
    Restaurant, wine and liquor prices are specified.
    If you do not find it in the english translation, I’m quite willing to specify the French text with page numbers etc.
    Léon Poliakov, ‘Bréviaire de la Haine, Le IIIe Reich et les Juifs’, 1951, 1974, Paris

  328. @Colin Wright

    The Weimar Republic war run by USA bankster committees, there were three of them, Owen, Davis, forgot the third name.
    The Weimar Republic did not pay the reparations, as Keynes had explained, impossible.
    If among the committees there were jews, probable, never saw it mentioned as such.
    And indeed, nearly all the ‘leading’ German politicians were jews.

  329. Excellent and much-needed article, mr.Unz!

    Two aphorisms, the first from 1903 by the once famous German-Jewish philosopher Otto Weininger, in my translation, the second from 1897 by German philosopher Ludwig Klages in the translation of Joseph D. Pryce:

    “The trick of the Jew is to stand alongside God”.

    (The prophesy of a Jewish friend:) “Herr Klages, the ancient world was destroyed by Judaism, just as the modern world is about to be!” When I voiced my skepticism as to the accuracy of his prophesy… he merely responded: “Just wait – you will live to see my prophesy fulfilled!”

    • Replies: @Anon
  330. @muselman3295

    Weird, all these sonderkommando’s were killed after a few weeks, so the story goes, on top of that, according to Poliakov, at the end of 1944 the gas chambers for humans were demolished by explosives.
    What you visited in Birkenau has never been used for killing humans, university chemical analyses demonstrated.

    • Replies: @j2
  331. Mike P says:
    @jilles dykstra

    I suppose, Goldhagen is an idiot.

    That is beside the point. Goldhagen was given a faculty position of Harvard – he is a symptom of the deep dishonesty and corruption in academia regarding all things holocaust (and many other themes as well, but don’t get me started).

  332. @j2

    Nearly anyone registered as a jew was deported from the Netherlands.
    Leaving the trains at Auschwitz those seen as fit for work were separated from the others.
    Also from the Netherlands were deported all men seen as fit for work.
    Yet, an uncle of mine prevented this by simulating that he did not speak German.
    Someone else, not jewish, was deported for work.
    He was treated badly, how and why I never knew, he did not want to talk about it.
    But his whole life after the war was influenced by it.
    However, being treated badly is consistent with Rassinier describing how the inmate camp management acted cruelly, including slow strangulation for anyone to see.
    The Germans did not care, they were only interested in marching out each morning the number of workers they needed.
    Stories about workers dying because of work conditions, highly improbable, with any able bodied man fighting Germany was desperately short of manpower.
    Even able bodied in the army was not possible, the Atlantic Wall was manned by inferior soldiers, among them foreign, such as Russian.

    • Replies: @MarkinPNW
  333. For those like Ron who have not read the diary attributed to the young Anne Frank, they might save themselves some time by reading “What Did Anne Frank Have against Americans?” http://www.dcdave.com/article5/150811.htm

  334. @Greg Bacon

    Having read nearly all that Wikipedia article I can see that there is a lot of badly drafted legislation but only the Israeli law seemed – arguably – to prevent someone saying the 6 million or any other figure is an exaggeration. I don’t defend the legislation but I think only some stupid, badly advised out the flaw or determined to challenge it in a pigheaded way has to fear imprisonment. An obvious line would be “I support my Jewish friends, all decent sensible people, who care for the goodwill of all and oppose exaggeration of the appalling facts of the Holocaust and closing down honest expressions of opinion for political purposes. I fear it will not help defend Israel, if that is their main objective, to insist that no one is allowed to point out or argue that the proven Nazi killings of Jews are a lot less than the 6 million figure which we have all grown up with”.

    • Replies: @Chase
  335. @Wally

    Neither of the Rudolf links refers to torture committed against defendants at the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial.

    • Replies: @Wally
  336. Anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:
    @academic gossip

    Eisenhower in fact specifically anticipated Holocaust revisionism and made a point of being personally photographed at German concentration camps in front of piles of dead prisoners

    Even the official version holds that there were no death camps in Germany.

    • Agree: Ron Unz
  337. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    Typically annamaria is all over the place. I don’t know whether Russian friends set her on her blogging path but I doubt they have increased her pay after initial probation.

  338. Anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    There is no doubt that this [persecution of Jews in Hungary and
    their expulsion from enemy territory] is probably the greatest and
    most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world,
    and it has been done by scientific machinery by nominally civilised
    men in the name of a great State and one of the leading races of
    Europe.

    What does Churchill’s singling out Hungary as exceptional imply about the rest of the official version?

  339. Anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:
    @academic gossip

    There is no doubt that this [persecution of Jews in Hungary and
    their expulsion from enemy territory]
    is probably the greatest and
    most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world

    How faithful is the bracketed language to the original intended referent of “this”?

  340. @Anon

    The translation of ‘ausrottung’ as ‘extermination’ colors the interpretation of the speech.
    In english you might translate it as ‘rooted out’. Anyway, the term ‘exterminate’ (from the latin ex terminus) literally means ‘taken to the boundaries’. So there you have it – ‘rooted out’ and expelled.

    • Replies: @ben tillman
  341. Anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:

    In Wikopedia on the subject of Ron Unz, they state that he is not “anti-semetic”, but I think all that is going to change with this article. What is left to say to Mr. Unz except “duck”.

  342. @Bardon Kaldian

    hard-core holo-deniers

    What, precisely, is a “holo-denier”? And what constitutes a “hard-core” one?

  343. utu says:
    @Anon

    Yes, the self preservation. They did not want to go fight Soviets. The human material that was used to fill up positions of guards in concentration camps was not the best. Which is no different than it is with department of correction workers and parole officers nowadays.

  344. S says:
    @S

    The below excerpt from the account regarding Andersonville, the South’s Camps, and the 1870 Atlantic Monthly article has been corrected with the emboldened portion below…

    Andersonville and the Southern Camps

    At the conclusion of the Civil War in the Spring of 1865 the United States (Union) due in part out of bitterness due to its great losses incurred began a campaign that by way of a series of trials was to first try, and then to have executed by hanging, the entirety of the upper echolons of the political and military leadership of the defeated South (ie Jefferson Davis and his cabinet, General Robert E Lee and his subordinate generals) for ‘crimes against humanity’ allegedly involving the southern camp system, the main southern camp Andersonville with its associated rail depot being the centerpiece of this effort.

  345. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Why do you invite derision by such blatant nonsense as suggesting Jewish ancestry (and it’s relevance) for Churchill and getting the date of Lord Moyne’s assassination wrong by 9 years? (He was killed in 1944). As to ancestry see

    http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/churchills-jewish-ancestry-not_08.php

  346. JoeFour says:
    @Wally

    I’ve been on-board.

    Ron Unz has put himself in the gun sights and deserves the same respect (and blessings) as the gentlemen you mention (who can all be considered messengers of the truth).

    I find your response to me to be … well … a bit odd.

    Cheers.

  347. annamaria says:
    @Anon

    Anon [121], it is the accomplished feat of Holocaustians to make people see with a greater clarity the horrors inflicted on Russia by the Jewish Bolsheviks in the first half of the 20th century, as well as the ongoing horrors inflicted on the civilian populations of the Middle East by Ziocons according to Yinon plan for Eretz Israel.
    The WWII was the World war so that many people of various ethnicities died. There is no sense to focus our sympathies on one, Jewish ethnicity that is known for its murderous habits towards Russians and Middle Easterners.
    “Although only around 4% of Russia’s population was Jewish, Jews constituted perhaps 80-85% of the early Soviet government … prior to World War II, Jews remained enormously over-represented in the Communist leadership, especially dominating the Gulag administration and the top ranks of the dreaded NKVD. … the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close.”
    Stop practicing your profiteering / extracting habits. They are disgusting.

  348. annamaria says:
    @peterAUS

    “…I am against all brainwashing & taboos.”
    You and Bardon Kaldian are both are for taboos and against the First Amendment when your ethnic sensitivity is affected. Live with that and do not pretend on being a free thinker.
    You are no Spinoza

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  349. I long thought the Holocaust was the greatest crime in human history premised on two beliefs.
    One, which remains, is that it was done by one of us, a modern Western nation. The other is that it was a concerted effort organised by the government and with few underlings showing their reluctance to wipe out the Jewish people from Europe – whether that was after expulsion had failed or not I didn’t consider.

    Where am I at now? There was a long history of German anti-Semitism. Particularly in the circumstances created by WW1, the Bolshevik Revolution, related insurgencies, and the Depression of the early 1930s blaming of the Jews and violence toward opponents, political or ethnic (and/or religious perhaps) became much more thinkable and likely and old ideas of extermination by no means unsayable. Hitler and his gang themselves entertained and represented this strain of thought very strongly. Hitler, however, knew he must dissemble about all sorts of matters on which most respectable Germans, and foreigners in particular, would draw the line. Moreover in his scale of priorities, in 1933, squeezing money out of Jews while that squeezed them ju them out of the country suited him fine as an initial goal. Ostjuden were already seen as a problem before September 1939, and the idea of a large number being added to an extended German Reich was a disastrous prospect so he was perfectly content to let his most ferociously anti Semitic henchmen like Himmler sort it out with the same care he showed in concealing what would cause the Nazis unnecessary trouble, even to some extent in Germany, if it was generally understood. There were so many reasons for shooting or encouraging locals to shoot Jews where Einsatzgruppen followed in the wake of Barbarossa that the case for it to happen, and that it did happen, was overwhelming. That, after the Wannsee conference, more comprehensive destructive measures against the Eastern European Jews were taken seems to be the only explanation covering the mass transportation of Jewish women, children and the elderly from France, Holland, Belgium and Hungary. Numbers? Irrelevant.

    BTW… As I meant to say in answer to some wittering about how efficient Germans *would have* killed those unfit for work Zyclon B may have been primarily an insecticide (therefore cheap and maybe less likely to raise suspicions) but it was cyanide based so a pretty efficient medium for killing people crammed into a small space. Also, how can the chemists who have allegedly found too little cyanide residue be sure that they have examined everything needed to draw reliable conclusions given the extent of the destruction by retreating Germans? (I haven’t yet finished listening to Nicholas Kollerstrom as recommended by Ron so I may end up seeing Auschwicz as a sideshow in the Holocaust story but he hasn’t impressed me so far).

  350. Anonymous[908] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Typically annamaria is all over the place. I don’t know whether Russian friends set her on her blogging path but I doubt they have increased her pay after initial probation.

    Why don’t you have the integrity and honesty of character necessary to make accusations against annamaria using your own name, and addressing such posts to annamaria?

    • Replies: @Anon
  351. Anonymous[908] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    In Wikopedia on the subject of Ron Unz, they state that he is not “anti-semetic”, but I think all that is going to change with this article. What is left to say to Mr. Unz except “duck”.

    Jesus H. Mother-Humping Keerist!! The term “antisemitic” has been in existence and common usage for over 100 years. Why in the name of Satan can’t you dumbfucks SPELL it?

  352. @Wizard of Oz

    Why would they bother trying to use Zyklon B when they had Sarin?

    https://cen.acs.org/articles/94/i41/Nazi-origins-deadly-nerve-gases.html

    In addition, Prussian Blue is a very stable compound and allegedly can still be found in the places where clothing etc was treated for lice. Cyanide reacts with the iron in bricks.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  353. S says:

    My guess is that Ron Unz with his American Pravda series of articles has concerns, as do more than a few others, about where the murderous fanaticism reflected in much of the language of what is termed the ‘radical left’ within the modern West is ultimately heading towards…ie he’d rather not be at the receiving end of a gunshot fired by a fanatical member of a ‘revolutionary tribunal’ irrespective of whether the person firing the gun is Jewish or Gentile, and hence the brutal personal honesty (the times demand it!) displayed in this series of articles which I can only commend.

    Would be members of ‘revolutionary tribunals’ in the United States and elsewhere might do well to recall the ultimate fate of some of their spiritual and political compatriots…ie France’s Robespierre (execution by guillotine) and many of the ‘Old Bolsheviks’ in Russia (death by gunshot fired into the base of their skulls)…as this fanatical murderousness has a way of coming around full circle.

    And just as Robespierre and the Old Bolsheviks found out it in years past, it won’t matter when that day comes around (as it likely will should these modern fanatics get their way) how much they blubber on about their lives and their ‘loyalty’.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  354. j2 says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “Weird, all these sonderkommando’s were killed after a few weeks, so the story goes”

    So the story goes, and therefore it is strange to read that Nazis left 110 sonderkommandos alive, very stupid of them. And a strange case is also Henryk Tauber, who was sonderkommando much longer than a few weeks. I found only 12 sonderkommandos, who have testified, the first 7 escaped Auschwitz, of the others I do not know how they survived.
    1. Alfred Wetzler (alias Jozef Lánik)
    2. Rudolf Vrba
    3. Arnost Rosin
    4. Czesław Mordowicz
    5. Henryk (Tauber) Fuchsbrunner, sonderkommando 1943-1945
    6. Szlomo Dragan
    7. Abraham Dragan
    8. Alter Feinsilber
    9. Henryk Mandelbaum
    10. Filip Müller
    11. Milton Buki (Kaufmann)
    12. Dov Paiskovic
    Maybe muselman’s sonderkommando was one of these. Their testimonies have been scrutinized by the so called deniers. Some gave very a short time for cremation of a body. Would be good to know the name of the sonderkommando muselman refers to.

  355. bossel says:

    And although Germans are notorious for their extreme bureaucratic precision, this immense wartime project was apparently implemented without benefit of a single written document, or at least no such document has ever been located.

    That’s nonsense, there are more than enough documents that relate to the effort, decided in 1941, to exterminate Jews. The question is not whether there was a holocaust, only how large it was. Reasonable estimates range from 4 (eg. Reitlinger) to around 6 million (eg. Asmuss).
    Yad Vashem has over 4m individual names, at least 2m of which stem from documentary evidence.

    Considering the planned “deportation” of 11 m Jews (Wannsee conference, 1942):

    6m actual victims doesn’t seem too unreasonable.

    Most probably the number was somewhere between 5 & 6 million. I tend to rely on Rummel for democide. He usually has the most reasonable numbers.

    The problem is not that freaks like Irving get pummeled, but that 6m has become a dogma. & even if the numbers your research gets to are only slightly lower, in some circles you already become a holocaust denier.

    • Replies: @j2
    , @Wally
    , @j2
  356. EugeneGur says:
    @Colin Wright

    Obviously, Hitler actually killed most of them, but without stunningly profligate and often outright idiotic Russian tactics, he never could have bagged so many.

    Forgive me but this is an idiotic statement borne of ignorance and, perhaps, of the ingrained Western propaganda. First, it wasn’t 16 million – the military, meaning combat, losses were roughly similar in the Russian and German Armies. Second, there were non-combat losses, which were way higher in the Russian army, since the Russians did not deliberately kill their German prisoners.

    Obviously, mistakes were made and stupid things done, particularly in the earlier phase of the war. But that was an inevitable learning curve, since before that war the Russian commanders at all levels lacked experience in the modern warfare, and many lacked even elementary education. But even then they didn’t do that badly: they made do with what they had in hand faced with the huge material superiority of the Germans.

    For example, it took the Germans led by venerable von Manstein, no less, 8 months to take Sevastopol in the spring of 1942. The Russians took it back in the spring of 1944 in 5 days suffering approximately 4-fold lower losses – in the attack, mind you – than the Germans.

    The Western sources on all these events are grossly inaccurate and prejudicial. They’ll all tell you about “the General frost” or “a pile of bodies”. Don’t pay attention to them.

    • Replies: @L.K
  357. @Colin Wright

    Of course the Holocaust happened. It’s tedious that there are so many who so monotonously insist otherwise.

    No, what’s beyond tedious is that there are so many apparently intelligent people who feel so compelled to monotonously bleat meaningless, thought terminating cliches like: “Of course the Holocaust happened.”

    If we’re going to even attempt to begin assessing whether or not “the Holocaust happened”, Colin, you’re going to have to stop monotonously bleating mindless mantras, and begin by defining and describing in a clear and concise manner what “the Holocaust” was and how it “happened”.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  358. @Peripatetic commenter

    C’mon! Are you really saying you can’t see why they might have decided not to send Sarin to Auschwicz and have dumb soldier Schweik handle it?

  359. @S

    I think you Are referring to people who make it easier to believe in the prevalence of savage would be exterminators.

    • Replies: @S
  360. Hans says:

    Excellent short film of the persecutions of Rudolf, Zundel, and Cole: El Gran Tabu –

    The revisionist film that DESTROYED a film festival! Victory in Baja! A Revisionist Dream Comes True: An unprecedented step forward for the Holocaust revisionist movement by the late, great Bradley R. Smith

  361. j2 says:
    @bossel

    “6m actual victims doesn’t seem too unreasonable.”

    But it does seem unreasonable in the sense that only 4.5M are missing if you subtract AJCY figures in 1946 and 1939 and make known corrections for emigration out of Europe.

    “I tend to rely on Rummel for democide. He usually has the most reasonable numbers.”

    What could mean the most reasonable numbers? The Jewish population of Eastern Europe is very uncertain. There are no “usually most reasonable numbers”. There are estimates. Divide Poland to West and East by the border after 1939. Then calculate how many were in West, where the population figures are fairly reliable. Take into account transfers between East and West not through Operation Reinhard camps, West including all outside the SU of 1940 and Romania. Subtract all known losses everywhere but Auschwitz and known survivors. You will end up to the upper bound 400,000 to Auschwitz, meaning the official version is clearly wrong. Indeed “I tend to rely…” Please, calculate the figure and do not rely on “usually the most reasonable numbers”.

  362. Anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    And you are? Actually some good advice to Colin Wright not to waste his time. Maybe you should take the benefit too.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  363. Wally says:
    @bossel

    “Documents”? What documents? Laughable. Post them if you have them and get educated.

    As for Wannsee, there was a conference, yawn, however:
    The Wannsee Conference Protocol, Anatomy of a Fabrication
    By Johannes Peter Ney : https://codoh.com/library/document/934/?lang=en
    and: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=wannsee
    and:
    Wannsee Conference minutes debunked: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1647
    and: A fresh look at the Wannsee Conference minutes.: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11741

    And due to obvious war complications, Hitler decided that the ‘Jewish question’ would be decided AFTER the war.
    Schlegelberger Document

    “Mr Reich Minister Lammers informed me that the Führer had repeatedly declared to him that he wants to hear that the Solution of the Jewish Problem has been postponed until after the war is over. That being so, the current discussions are of purely theoretical value, in Mr Reich Minister Lammers’ opinion. He will moreover take pains to ensure that, whatever else happens, no fundamental decisions are taken without his knowledge in consequence of a surprise briefing by any third party.”

    Document’s origins. Schlegelberger’s undated minute on Lammer’s reference to Hitler’s ruling is in German Federal Archives (BA) file R.22/52. It was sent to Staatssekretär Freisler and two other officials (bottom left).
    This document has been published in facsimile in David Irving’s books Hitler’s War, Goebbels. Mastermind of the Third Reich, and Nuremberg, the Last Battle. It was definitely dated March or April 1942. Lammers was in Berlin on April 26, 1942.
    See Scheel’s report on a talk between Lammers and Meissner after the final session that day (T175/139/7479 et seq.)

    In support of the Schlegelberger Document see the Luther Memorandum: http://www.codoh.com/library/document/154/

    Hitler, the ‘Final Solution,’ and the Luther Memorandum, A Response to Evans and Longerich
    excerpt:
    “On the occasion of a reception by the Reich Foreign Minister on 26 November 1941 the Bulgarian Foreign Minister Popoff touched on the problem of according like treatment to the Jews of European nationalities and pointed out the difficulties that the Bulgarians had in the application of their Jewish laws to Jews of foreign nationality.”

    “The Reich Foreign Minister answered that he thought this question brought by Mr. Popoff not uninteresting. Even now he could say one thing to him, that at the end of the war all Jews would have to leave Europe. This was the unalterable decision of the Fuehrer and also the only way to master this problem, as only a global and comprehensive solution could be applied and individual measures would not help very much.”

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Andrew E. Mathis
  364. @Colin Wright

    Actually, Wally. Maybe World War Two didn’t happen at all — any of it.

    Can you prove it did? Hmm? Hmm? Wally? Wally?

    You’re right. This is incredibly easy.

    No one is disputing that World War Two happened, Colin.

    Can you please define and describe in a clear and concise manner what “the Holocaust” was and how it “happened”, in order that we may begin assessing whether or not “the Holocaust happened”.

    Thanks in advance.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  365. Anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @Flying Dutchman

    Don’t be mysterious or cryptic. Spell out how Judaism destroyed the ancient world. It sounds like some grandfather teasing his bright 10 to 15 year grandchildren with a bit of nonsensical paradox to work out.

    • Replies: @Flying Dutchman
    , @Robjil
  366. anastasia says:
    @muselman3295

    Have you ever closely questioned your friend. I doubt it. You were probably afraid to question him, for fear of bringing up a sore subject. Or perhaps it never even occurred to you to question him. But I would start there, if I were you.

  367. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    You’re in over your head.

    - So present your proof for the alleged massive Einsatzgruppen shootings that you claim. The Industry says that ca. 2,000000 Jews were shot and to this day their remains lay in mass graves.

    - Please show these alleged immense human remains that Jews claim still exist at alleged locations.

    - Zyklon-B was not cheap, quite the contrary. The insecticide required much more processing, expense, and labor to produce vs. the much more efficient & readily available sarin and tabun.

    - Please tell us how the alleged gas chambers worked.

    Germar Rudolf utterly destroys the Zyklon B / cyanide absurdity, impossibility.
    more from Master Chemist Germar Rudolf:

    The Rudolf Report / Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz: http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html
    and:
    ‘Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau’, by Master Chemist Germar Rudolf: http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html

    http://www.codoh.com

  368. @Wizard of Oz

    Wait. The Germans efficiently organized the extermination of 6M Jews and incinerated the bodies at a time when they needed all the coal and oil/gasoline they could get their hands on, but they couldn’t find soldiers who could handle nerve gas carefully?

    Is that the new narrative?

  369. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Even more silly was the alleged use of a pesticide, Zyklon-B, in the first place.

    The Germans had huge stocks of very efficient, low amounts required, Sarin & Tabun nerve gases they could have used had they actually wanted to exterminate people.

    The entire Zyklon-B issue is truly laughable.

    see: b> Zyklon-B help!: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10798
    much more:

    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=sarin+tabun

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Anon
  370. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wally

    Wally,

    Are you Unz’s guard dog or what?

    But in any case, why don’t you post that picture of a mechanical shovel again. That might finally convince everyone that no Jews at all were harmed in any way by the Nazis who sent them to concentration camps from all over Europe, including France and Italy, for their own health and happiness.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wally
  371. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    Wow!
    You’re panties are in a twist.
    Obviously I’m now inside your head.

    No worries, cognitive dissonance can be a bitch.
    Calm down, just admit it, & get it over with.
    The ‘holocaust’ narrative is preposterous any way you look at it.
    All Revisionists are former Believers.

    recommended:
    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos

    https://shop.codoh.com/category/22


    http://www.codoh.com

  372. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    The problem is not so much for Ron Unz, a very rich, self-employed Jew. The problem will be for ordinary folks who thoughtlessly echo Unz’s sentiments, bolstered perhaps by Wally’s picture of a steam shove. People, in other words, folks who don’t know what they are talking about. For them, career, social standing and even personal liberty may be put at stake.

    On the plus side, the ADL and Canada’s very own B’nai Brith must love this kind of incitement to anti-Semitism. It’s what brings the money in and the publicity flowing. They will of course not criticize Unz, but the innocents so readily persuaded by the Unz and Wally team should watch out.

  373. Wally says:
    @j2

    Right, and many have seen witches & werewolves too.

    However, there were many who volunteered to work & Germany and get paid.

    http://www.codoh.com

  374. Anonymous[398] • Disclaimer says:
    @Muh 6 Gorrillion!!!!!!!!

    If we’re going to even attempt to begin assessing whether or not “the Holocaust happened”, Colin, you’re going to have to stop monotonously bleating mindless mantras, and begin by defining and describing in a clear and concise manner what “the Holocaust” was and how it “happened”.

    Where would such an “assessment” end up? It is 2018. Jewish/Israeli monetary monopoly and control dominates the globe, and ruthlessly controls the actions of all western so-called “democracies”.

    What goddamn difference does any 75-years-past “holocaust” make? Why would any sensible, intelligent individual spend two freaking microseconds of concern with the topic? Such activity is an utter, self-destructive waste of time.

  375. Anonymous[398] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    And you are? Actually some good advice to Colin Wright not to waste his time. Maybe you should take the benefit too.

    Nah. How about I make it a practice to point out what a miserable asshole you are for attacking posters behind an alias and misogynist prejudice? What’s your druthers, bruvver? Once a day? Twice a day? One for one? Two for one?

    Act like a man, you puling adolescent.

  376. j2 says:
    @bossel

    “Most probably the number was somewhere between 5 & 6 million. I tend to rely on Rummel for democide. He usually has the most reasonable numbers.”

    The issue is not selecting numbers that you think reasonable. That would be like flipping a coin. I think 5 to 6 million is most reasonable, so I pick up that number, and this Rummel has numbers that I like, so I rely on him. No, this is not the way to do it. If there is a controversy on something you must find out which one is correct and have reasons for it, not that someone is more reasonable because you like some 5-6M number. You must have a solid proof.

    There is one set of numbers to start with, they are the AJC Yearbook numbers, they are the oldest, to them one can make justified corrections if there is good reason to do so. For Western Europe these numbers are very much the same for every analysis, even your Rummel must have almost the same numbers.

    Directly calculating from these numbers and including emigration (before the war from Germany and Austria, legal, illegal and from the DP camps after 1946), which AJCY forgets and correcting an error on Romania you get to 4.5M, but by doing only this way you get one possible number for the death toll. You do not know if it is more reasonable than some other. Therefore you must do differently. You need a proof, not reasonable numbers.

    Do it like this. First you start with the Western Europe and Western Poland and calculate if the figures make sense. This gives you a compelling reason to doubt the Auschwitz death toll, as you get an upper bound 400,000 that is much smaller than the official death toll for Jews, 1-1.5M. Now, and only now, and you check that for sure you did not make any mistake and these Western numbers are quite reliable. This gives you the first proof: all sent to Auschwitz did not die. They were sent from there to other camps.

    Now you can continue to calculate the 4.5M. But while you do it, what you notice is a second problem in the official explanation: the DP camps. There came 270,000 Jews from the East to the DP camps. This you can completely show by calculating how many emigrated from those DP camps and how many were left there after 1946. This second proof. 270,000 Jews did pass the Operation Reinhard camps alive. Now you really start to doubt the official explanation.

    The final gives 4.5M, but then you start asking if the Jewish population in the SU of 1940 was 2.8M+1.55M=4.35M. The 1.55M is Eastern Poland and 2.8M is the rest. How do we know it was this figure? Check the growth of the USA Jewish population. Yes, it grew 1M too fast. Consider if 0.5M of Polish Jews were not in France and other Western Europe as recent arrivals, maybe?

    It is really a most ridiculous way to approach a controversial problem to “tend to rely” on numbers provided by one of the sides in this controversy. Naturally, you have to do the calculations yourself in order to form your opinion on it. Numbers taken from some author give the result that the author already obtained. You need a solid proof to resolve a controversy.

    • Replies: @Wally
  377. Wally says:
    @utu

    said:
    “But not if you try to advance a hypothesis that some of the epidemics were spread by Jews.”

    Actually diseases were indeed spread by Jews.

    “Which brings us to the larger issue of Weindling’s extreme apologetic tendencies. That Eastern European Jews – like virtually any other Eastern Europeans – were vectors of typhus and other diseases endemic to the region is a simple fact. “

    source:
    Typhus and Cholera, Nazis and Jews, a Book Review, By Samuel Crowell: https://codoh.com/library/document/3002/?lang=en

    http://www.codoh.com

  378. Wally says:
    @CalDre

    see:
    Roman Yushkov: First Russian On Trial for ‘holocaust denial’

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11965

    And that’s one of best indicators that the matter is a fraud which cannot withstand scrutiny, as we are proving right here at http://www.unz.com
    Only lies require censorship.

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the ‘holocaust’ storyline is the message.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  379. S says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I think you Are referring to people who make it easier to believe in the prevalence of savage would be exterminators.

    Hmmm. No, within the context of my entry I’m referring specifically as stated to:

    ‘..the murderous fanaticism reflected in much of the language of what is termed the ‘radical left’ within the modern West..’

  380. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    In Wikopedia on the subject of Ron Unz, they state that he is not “anti-semetic”, but I think all that is going to change with this article. What is left to say to Mr. Unz except “duck”.

    Lol, yeah, Unz’s previous American Pravda pieces (rabbis pray to Satan; Jews did kidnap & kill Christian children to use their blood in making matzos; Nazi Germany helped in the founding of Israel; et al.) were within bounds. But now, with this piece, Ron will definitely be scratched off of the list of potential keynote speakers at Abe Foxman’s 80th birthday celebration at ADL headquarters.

    • LOL: Ron Unz
  381. @jilles dykstra

    ‘I indeed did not read the book, did not even know it.
    About
    Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, ‘Hitler’s gewillige beulen’, Antwerpen 1996 (Hitler’s willing executioners; ordinary Germans and the holocaust, New York 1996)
    I suppose, Goldhagen is an idiot.’

    He is. Hitler’s Willing Executioners’ has some astonishing logical holes in it.

    Goldhagen appears to belong to the tribe of ‘vengeful German Jews.’ This is my term for those assimilated German Jews who abruptly found themselves cast out of Germany in the thirties — and to judge by their subsequent careers, appear to have vowed revenge. In Goldhagen’s case, the hurt was actually visited on his father, but as the son’s work demonstrates, proved heritable.

    As with another work of propaganda on behalf of Jewry — Joan Peter’s From Time Immemorial — what’s disturbing wasn’t the book itself. People write all kinds of books, advocating all kinds of things. It was the rapturously uncritical reception accorded it. In both cases the work was transparently flawed. Yet it took some time, and some insistent raised voices, for this to be accepted.

    • Replies: @utu
  382. Che Guava says:
    @utu

    Vonnegut was a P.o.W. in Dresden you fool, sure, he didn’t know exact numbers, but he was sure experiencing it. HE WAS THERE.

    That you try to conflate his work with a writer you dislike (and whose work I respect) really has convinced me that you are just a stupid propagandist.

  383. Wally says:
    @red-ice

    Yawn, I see the “difference”, but so what? It’s apparent that torture was used in many trials.

    The real question is why are you trying to whitewash Nuremberg?

    Here you go, Google search: testicles nuremberg van roden

    Oops!

    http://www.codoh.com

  384. @Muh 6 Gorrillion!!!!!!!!

    ‘No one is disputing that World War Two happened, Colin.’

    No, I choose to dispute that it happened. I just did.

    Now, demonstrate the contrary. Need I mention that no form of evidence you would reject if it came to establishing the reality of the Holocaust will be accepted when it comes to establishing World War Two occurred?

  385. Vox Day raises an interesting possibility:

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2018/08/aristotle-and-holocaust.html

    However, Ron Unz’s iconoclastic piece got me thinking about the logic of the historical situation as we know it and some of the anomalies that have proven so difficult to resolve in a satisfying manner, massive anomalies that have led to criminal accusations of Holocaust denial on the one hand and charges of shameless historical mythmaking on the other. But what if both parties are basically correct concerning their primary points of emphasis? What happens if, in the spirit of theoretical skepticism, we simply apply straightforward logic to the facts as we observe them to be.

    Major Premise: A very large quantity of Jews were killed in the 1936 to 1945 time frame.

    Minor Premise: The meticulously bureaucratic Germans, for whom historians possess a tremendous quantity of historical documents related to the WWII era, do not appear to have kept any records of any of the many aspects of the logistical and operative decisions and actions required for the major premise, nor did they have the motive or the opportunity to thoroughly eliminate those records.

    Conclusion: Someone other than the Germans killed most of those Jews.

    Hmmmm, who might that be?

    Vox leaves us with this thought:

    And finally, a Soviet Holocaust might also explain the insane neocon obsession with going to war with Russia. Are they really that bitter about the Tsars, who vanished into history more than 100 years ago? Or is it possible they are seeking revenge for a more recent historical offense?

    • Replies: @Wally
  386. Ron Unz says:

    A couple of very old-time libertarians dropped me notes, generally commending my article, but noting some factual errors that I would now like to now correct.

    First, the late Murray Rothbard was apparently not an outright Holocaust Denier. Apparently, he was quite cautious about accepting either side of the debate and believed that additional research was necessary to resolve the issue. But he was very critical of the attempts to suppress such further investigation.

    It’s very easy to imagine how this sort of position could have gotten garbled after so many decades, especially if he did sometimes ridicule those trying to enshroud it in a near-religious aura.

    Also, David Hoggan was apparently a tenured professor at San Francisco State around the time he produced his manuscript of The Myth of the Six Million in the early 1960s. Apparently some time afterward, he suffered a nervous breakdown and eventually resigned, or at least that’s the claim that was made by a prominent former colleague in an oral histery, and the details are a little unclear, but this professional trajectory seems quite plausible. The explicit published claim I read that he was at Stanford in the late 1960s is either a very strange error, or perhaps he later quietly held some sort of temporary position there.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wizard of Oz
    , @Sam
    , @L.K
  387. Wally says:
    @j2

    The real questions are:

    1. How were they supposedly killed?

    2. Were the alleged methods logically, physically, & scientifically possible?

    3. What were the alleged specific procedures taken to achieve these alleged immense killings?
    The alleged ‘gassings’ for example.

    3. What proof for these alleged immense killings actually exist?

    4. Why are there no immense human remains that are alleged to be in known locations?
    No immense human remains as alleged, no ‘holocaust’.

    Imagine in a real / legit court of law where someone claims that millions of people were murdered and dumped into allegedly known mass graves, but then could not produce the claimed mass graves and the alleged contents. They would be laughed out of that court.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @j2
  388. Hrw-500 says:
    @Hans

    Thanks for sharing that link Hans! I founded another one who included cartoons from Brazilian cartoonist Carlos Latuff about Charlie-Hebdo double standards.

    https://anonhq.com/charlie-hebdo-fired-anti-semitic-cartoonist-ridiculing-judaism-2009/

    • Replies: @Hans
  389. Wally says:
    @Peripatetic commenter

    posted:
    “Conclusion: Someone other than the Germans killed most of those Jews. ”

    No doubt the communist Soviet gulags and executions consumed some Jews along with the massive numbers of Christians, but one has to apply the same science and rational thought to that claim as one does with the claim of German guilt.

    Heretofore I see nothing to support that claim other than armchair musing.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Agree: Mike P
    • Replies: @Mike P
  390. utu says:
    @Colin Wright

    Goldhagen appears to belong to the tribe of ‘vengeful German Jews.

    Look at what was the Godhagen affair about? Whether he was vengeful or not it does not matter. It was about money. The Holocaust Industry wanted to keep squeezing Germany while Germans thought in their naivety that they have already paid enough. And it worked. Germany began donating submarines to Israel. Goldhagen did his job. How was he hired for it or how did he know what was his job I do not kno but it worked. Strangely however there was a controversy and the new Chair at Harvard that was specially funded for Goldhagen by a rich Jewish donor was not given to him. He was not hired for the tenured position. Is it possible that rich German foundations exerted some pressure on Harvard wanting to send the message to the future Goldhagens that Germany will not succumb to more extortions?

  391. Wally says:
    @Colin Wright

    WWII does not defy laws of science, rational thought, & logic.
    The ‘holocaust’ story certainly does.

    Choose to deny WWII if you wish. No one will try to send you to jail for doing so.

    Wow, you’re really grasping.

    Anyway, cheers

    http://www.codoh.com

  392. Surely this is a parody?

    https://www.historiography-project.org/1946/02/13/pedalactuated-brainbashing-mac/

    “In this small room there was a slot in the wall, approximately 50 centimeters in length. The prisoner of war stood with the back of his head against the slot and a sniper shot at him from behind the slot. In practice this arrangement did not prove satisfactory, since the sniper often missed the prisoner. After 8 days a new arrangement was made. The prisoner, as before, was placed against the wall; an iron plate was then slowly lowered onto his head. The prisoner was under the impression that he was being measured for height. The iron plate contained a ramrod which shot out suddenly and poleaxed the prisoner with a blow on the back of the head. He dropped dead. The iron plate was operated by a foot lever in a corner of the room. The personnel working in the room belonged to the above-mentioned Sonderkommando.” (Emphasis changed from the original.)

  393. Isabella says:

    To start with, thank you Unz for producing this very fair and scholarly work.

    This whole issue of the Holocaust has been a difficult one to work through.

    Like millions of others, I have seen the films made by the liberating Armies, of the gaunt, starved walking skeletons in humiliating prison garb; had seen the video of a front end loader filled with naked bodies being shovelled into a mass grave; had seen the photo of a young woman clutching her baby to her breast gazing down into a pit, a uniformed Nazi with his pistol at her head.
    It seemed too much to deny.
    So I have never denied that the Nazi’s treated anyone who they disliked appallingly. This to include the mentally defective, Romanies, Christian Democrats [German ones too], and many Jews.
    They cannot be excused that crime.

    What I could not accept was the number. 6 million people is a lot of people. They are too many to hide. The grave sites for them would be utterly massive. Even Katyn was discovered, and that held about 22,000 bodies.
    Where would they put 6 million bodies? And this many could be proved, since, although sorting through limb and rib bones could be an onerous task, finding and counting skulls is very do-able.
    So do we have documents with picture, forensic evidence in other words, that demonstrates 6 million skulls found?? Because if so, I have never heard of it.

    Can we acknowledge that the German Nazi machine killed many people, including many jews, even if they were killed by starvation and neglect rather than extinguished in gas ovens, but doubt the number.? Does doubting the number count as being a “Holocaust Denier?”

    I would like to add that, contrary to the picture of the map of Europe and Russia, that Russia does NOT outlaw being a “Holocaust Denier”. It outlaws denying that the Nazis committed crimes, [any crimes] ; denying the role of the USSR in the battle to defeat the Nazis, and outlaws any mockery of those USSR soldiers who fought or in any way downgrading their fight.

    Thus it is very open – it doesn’t specify the Holocaust at all. IN this way this law in Russia has been badly misrepresented.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Anatoly Karlin
  394. Graham says:
    @escobar

    Hear, hear. Ron Unz’s views are a great pity, as are his provocative and irritating book recommendations (Mein Kampf etc.), which seem designed to suggest that unz.com is a Nazi site; because his site fills a real need inasmuch as it provides a platform for those denied platforms elsewhere. No, I don’t suggest that Nazi views should be censored, just that I would prefer that they didn’t appear on this site.

    Perhaps Steve should consider moving. Steve is in a small minority of rational writers on unz.com, together with John Derbyshire and James Thompson; and perhaps a couple of others.

    My views don’t matter, but I’d like to say (i) that I believe the Germans murdered several million Jews in WW2; (ii) whether you call that a holocaust is immaterial; (iii) holocaust denial should not be a crime – free speech should be absolute.

    • Replies: @Art
    , @Wally
  395. @Anon

    Well, a little bit of old-fashioned European history for you;

    this Jewish prophet (Richard Perls was his name) was, like his friend Klages, a paganist, who saw Christianity as a Jewish sect, bringing the Roman empire to its knees, and with it a whole nature-centered ancient world.

    As for the modern world – we see Zionists behind and among the neocon psychopaths, using the ‘holocaust’ as one of their weapons, driving the whole world to a nuclear, real holocaust.

    Cryptic, what?

  396. phil says:
    @Anon

    There is a big difference between 0.5 million, or 1 million, and 6 million people. The Ukrainian Holodomor (“terror famine”) of the early 1930′s quite arguably involved more deaths than the Holocaust, but where are the Holodomor movies, the Holodomor Studies programs, and laws preventing people from questioning the severity of the Holodomor?

    • Replies: @Anon
  397. I have been just reading the book by Shlomo Sand, “The Invention of the Land of Israel”. He speaks in it about “semantic manipulation” that was used to justify the colonization of Palestine. What he explains more generally is the creation of myths to justify a project of conquest and power. Months ago I also read an article which spoke of a tomb which was a tomb of the 17th or 18th century of a Palestinian Sheik near which people of the villages around used tradicionally to gather and make their fests. This tomb was later transformed by Zionists in an old tomb of some Jewish patriach and nowadays religious Jews go there to pray to a supposed patriarch who in reality is a Palestinian sheik. Judaism and the country seems to be linked very strongly with myths. Zionism is based on myths which falsify reality. Because of that I think that it’s important to question what we are told.

    Concerning the H., I heard and read in the last years many stories which are difficult to understand immediately according to our popular ideas and to the official H. paradigma. There are all kind of stories, of things that need some explanation. Clearly many Jews who were in concentration camps had never heard of gas chambers until the end of the war. Once i saw an interview with a survivor who told that she had been born in a concentration camp where she lived with her mother and two older sisters. How did she survive? I saw on tv an Israeli who had been in a KZ who told that he learned about the H. only after the war. I read the book by Joachim Fest about the colapse of the nazi regime. He tells a lot about what was being discussed during the last months, weeks and days of the regime and it’s surprising that they never seemd to have any concerns about anything related to the H. There is an interview in which a man says that he was scheduled to the gas chambers but was saved because on that day he got sick and was sent to a hospital. There are other absurd stories.

    Two of the secretaries of Hitler and Goebbels (if I remember rightly) told that they never heard anything related to the H. At least one of them became very antinazi, didn’t doubt the H., warned about right radical parties, but said when she was already very old that she had never heard anything about the H. while working on the center of power. This is just the beginning of such stories which need explanation. I think that it would be important that historians give a careful explanation for such things that you read in newspapers or see on tv which are difficult to understand for a layman. History is made of myths and we need to get a clear view which reflects reality more closely.

    (initially I had written a commentary mentioning details of those cases that I heard but decided not to post the commentary).

  398. j2 says:
    @Wally

    Wally, your questions are good but you cannot give them answers in such a way that would immediately convince anybody. But try this:

    Assume 1.45M dead in Operation Reinhard camps, 0.15M in Chelmno, 1M in Auschwitz, 0.41M survived in concentration camps after the war. The sum of these numbers is 3M and you agree that these are the numbers that are proposed, Auschwitz even on the lower border. Now, notice that all of these camps are in present day Poland, about the same as Western Poland that Germany took 1939.

    How many Jews were in Western Poland in the war time? Well, there were about 3.3M Jews in Poland, divided into 1.8M in the West and 1.5M in the East after some 180,000 escaped to the east just before the German attack. And from Western Europe Germans transported about 1.2M. If all of them ended to Western Poland, the total is 3M. Additionally there were small direct transports from East to West and West to East, but these added only 60,000 to the Western Polish Jews. Thus, there were 3.06M Jews and we already explained the fate of 3M of them. There is 60,000 left.

    So, where are the death tolls from ghettos in Western Poland (0.17M), camps in Germany (0.3M) and Theresienstadt (0.03M) and deaths from German 1939 attack and terror (0.05M), which make
    together 0.55M? Nowhere. The death toll in Auschwitz must be only 0.45M. But as 1-1.5M Jews were taken to Auschwitz, this means that over half were transported to other camps, which means that the official story is absolutely wrong! And this is undeniable.

    Then we can reconsider if there were 3.3M Jews in Poland. Maybe some had moved to France and other Western Europe. Must be so because if the official story for Auschwitz is wrong, then we may just as well assume that only 60,000 Jews died there. Thus, the Jewish population in Western Poland was 0.3-0.4M smaller and the Polish Jewish population 0.5M smaller. That is 2.8M.

    Then we do the calculation of DP camps. There were 0.41M Jewish camp survivors when the war ended. In 1946 250,000 Jews in DP camps. Between 1946 and 1948 138,000 immigrated legally to Palestine, so 112,000 were left. But after 1948-53 Israel took 338,000 Jews from DP camps, the USA 137,00 and Canada and South Africa 20,000. So, there were 112,000 and 495,000 were taken. It means that after 1946 to the DP camps came 383,000. Of them 123,000 were from Romania, 104,00 from Poland, the rest 268,00 must have come from the SU and they must be Jews who survived the Operation Reinhard camps. That means, the official story is wrong. Those were not total extermination camps.

    If the official story is wrong with Operation Reinhard camps, we may assume that the death toll in these camps was only some 150,000, say. So, 1.3M passed them to the SU. Then we can ask how many died in the SU and for what reason. Supposedly in the SU in 1941 were 1.3M+2.8M=4.1M Jews and there came 1.3M more through the Operation Reinhard. That is 5.4M. The SU claimed that 2M survived and 268,000 went to the DP camps (round to 0.3M), so 3.1M would have died in the SU. That seems clearly too high, so we assume that the Jewish population in the SU of 1940 was 1M less, they immigrated to the USA through some other country and as non-Jews. This reduces the death toll to 2.1M.

    The last step is a bit speculative: 2.1M in the East may still be too high by 0.5M, because the population growth in the SU was probably smaller than 1.4%, so the final death toll may be 1.6M in the East and 0.8M in the West, total 2.4M.

    So, this is my simple way and you can derive from that where Jews died and that the death ratios are typical to concentration camps. Let us look at your questions:

    You want to pose the question if Jews could have been gassed in Auschwitz. I cannot see why it would be logically impossible to gas people. I agree that there should be Prussian Blue in gas chamber walls, but we know that many people deny this. You try to claim that bodies could not be burned to leave no traces to the mass graves, I agree, but they do not, and where is your proof that Germans could not manage to do such a miracle of technology. You want proofs of killings, documents, photos and so on. They give you these all. You claim they are forgeries, they claim they are authentic. That is, your questions do not solve the problem. You cannot make a simple proof with them. A proof must be so simple that it is undeniable. Rudolf’s chemistry is not undeniable as anybody can say that I do not understand chemistry and our expert says that Rudolf is wrong. So, there went your argument. But my addition and subtraction, well, they can do it.

    Wally, you have good links, but think about the strategy: how can you convince a person who does not like to be convinced? It must be simple and undeniable.

    By the way, Wally, if your comment on werewolves was to my comment that a young Polish girl was taken to work in Germany, then that case I know to be true, happens to be a person I know very well and can completely trust on this, the same the other case.

    • Replies: @Wally
  399. Otterboy says:

    As someone who used to be Jewish and believed everything I was told when I was growing up in a Jewish community in London, I have thoroughly researched the mainstream narrative of the holocaust religion

    This included reading most of the material listed in Ron Unz’s article (for and against) and two separate personal visits to Auschwitz. My research into this period of history began after a friend of mine gave me a copy of the Butz book. I was so sure it was all lies, I set about trying to debunk it.

    Unfortunately, many years later, I realised I could not debunk it and had to concede that the narrative of the holocaust that we have been led to believe simply didn’t happen

    It’s strange that I can openly argue, deny, revise and discuss ANY historical period in any country in the world EXCEPT this particular one. I can disagree with certain scholars who have researched the Atlantic slave trade, a human tragedy far more horrific than the alleged events of the holocaust. Some argue that the total death toll was ‘only’ around 8 – 9 million. Others argue that the figure was closer to 30 million and also argue that Jews had a prominent role in that disgraceful period of our history

    But in a growing list of countries, any such debate on the holocaust could land me in jail. This is the only period of human history since the beginning of human sentient time where a historical narrative can only be agreed with. Any diversion from that strictly narrow narrative can land you in jail in some countries and ruin your career in many others

    How have we allowed this to happen? It’s the beginning of the end of free speech

    Ron Unz is an incredibly brave human being. He’s obviously a very intelligent person and knew full well before he wrote this what the likely repercussions would be to him personally

    He has my utmost RESPECT

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Art
  400. kikl says: