The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
American Pravda: The Nature of Anti-Semitism
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_26002846

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I recently published a couple of long essays, and although they primarily focused on other matters, the subject of anti-Semitism was a strong secondary theme. In that regard, I mentioned my shock at discovering a dozen or more years ago that several of the most self-evidently absurd elements of anti-Semitic lunacy, which I had always dismissed without consideration, were probably correct. It does seem likely that a significant number of traditionally-religious Jews did indeed occasionally commit the ritual murder of Christian children in order to use their blood in certain religious ceremonies, and also that powerful Jewish international bankers did play a large role in financing the establishment of Bolshevik Russia.

When one discovers that matters of such enormous moment not only apparently occurred but that they had been successfully excluded from nearly all of our histories and media coverage for most of the last one hundred years, the implications take some time to properly digest. If the most extreme “anti-Semitic canards” were probably true, then surely the whole notion of anti-Semitism warrants a careful reexamination.

All of us obtain our knowledge of the world by two different channels. Some things we discover from our own personal experiences and the direct evidence of our senses, but most information comes to us via external sources such as books and the media, and a crisis may develop when we discover that these two pathways are in sharp conflict. The official media of the old USSR used to endlessly trumpet the tremendous achievements of its collectivized agricultural system, but when citizens noticed that there was never any meat in their shops, “Pravda” became a watchword for “Lies” rather than “Truth.”

Now consider the notion of “anti-Semitism.” Google searches for that word and its close variants reveal over 24 million hits, and over the years I’m sure I’ve seen that term tens of thousands of times in my books and newspapers, and heard it endlessly reported in my electronic media and entertainment. But thinking it over, I’m not sure that I can ever recall a single real-life instance I’ve personally encountered, nor have I heard of almost any such cases from my friends or acquaintances. Indeed, the only persons I’ve ever come across making such claims were individuals who bore unmistakable signs of serious psychological imbalance. When the daily newspapers are brimming with lurid tales of hideous demons walking among us and attacking people on every street corner, but you yourself have never actually seen one, you may gradually grow suspicious.

Indeed, over the years some of my own research has uncovered a sharp contrast between image and reality. As recently as the late 1990s, leading mainstream media outlets such as The New York Times were still denouncing a top Ivy League school such as Princeton for the supposed anti-Semitism of its college admissions policy, but a few years ago when I carefully investigated that issue in quantitative terms for my lengthy Meritocracy analysis I was very surprised to reach a polar-opposite conclusion. According to the best available evidence, white Gentiles were over 90% less likely to be enrolled at Harvard and the other Ivies than were Jews of similar academic performance, a truly remarkable finding. If the situation had been reversed and Jews were 90% less likely to be found at Harvard than seemed warranted by their test scores, surely that fact would be endlessly cited as the absolute smoking-gun proof of horrendous anti-Semitism in present-day America.

It has also become apparent that a considerable fraction of what passes for “anti-Semitism” these days seems to stretch that term beyond all recognition. A few weeks ago an unknown 28-year-old Democratic Socialist named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez scored a stunning upset primary victory over a top House Democrat in New York City, and naturally received a blizzard of media coverage as a result. However, when it came out that she had denounced the Israeli government for its recent massacre of over 140 unarmed Palestinian protesters in Gaza, cries of “anti-Semite” soon appeared, and according to Google there are now over 180,000 such hits combining her name and that harsh accusatory term. Similarly, just a few days ago the New York Times ran a major story reporting that all of Britain’s Jewish newspapers had issued an “unprecedented” denunciation of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, describing it as an “existential threat” to the Jewish community for the anti-Semitism it was fostering; but this apparently amounted to nothing more than its willingness to sharply criticize the Israeli government for its long mistreatment of the Palestinians.

ORDER IT NOW

One plausible explanation of the strange contrast between media coverage and reality might be that anti-Semitism once did loom very large in real life, but dissipated many decades ago, while the organizations and activists focused on detecting and combating that pernicious problem have remained in place, generating public attention based on smaller and smaller issues, with the zealous Jewish activists of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) representing a perfect example of this situation. As an even more striking illustration, the Second World War ended over seventy years ago, but what historian Norman Finkelstein has so aptly labeled “the Holocaust Industry” has grown ever larger and more entrenched in our academic and media worlds so that scarcely a day passes without one or more articles relating to that topic appearing in my major morning newspapers. Given this situation, a serious exploration of the true nature of anti-Semitism should probably avoid the mere media phantoms of today and focus on the past, when the condition might still have been widespread in daily life.

Many observers have pointed to the aftermath of the Second World War as marking a huge watershed in the public acceptability of anti-Semitism both in America and Europe, so perhaps a proper appraisal of that cultural phenomenon should focus on the years before that global conflict. However, the overwhelming role of Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution and other bloody Communist seizures of power quite naturally made them objects of considerable fear and hatred throughout the inter-war years, so the safest course might be to push that boundary back a little further and confine our attention to the period prior to the outbreak of the First World War. The pogroms in Czarist Russia, the Dreyfus Affair in France, and the lynching of Leo Frank in the American South come to mind as some of the most famous examples from that period.

 

ORDER IT NOW

In 1991 Cambridge University Press published The Jew Accused by Albert Lindemann, a noted scholar of European ideological movements, and his book focused on exactly that era and those sorts of incidents. Although the text is quite short, running less than 300 pages, Lindemann built his discussion upon a huge foundation of secondary literature, with his footnotes drawn from the 200 works included in his extensive bibliography. As far as I could tell, he seems a very scrupulous scholar, generally providing the multiple, often conflicting accounts of a given incident, and coming to his own conclusions with considerable hesitation.

This approach is certainly demonstrated in the first of his major cases, the notorious Dreyfus affair of late 19th century France, probably one of history’s most famous anti-Semitic incidents. Although he concludes that Captain Alfred Dreyfus was very likely innocent of the charge of espionage, he notes the seemingly strong evidence that initially led to his arrest and conviction and finds—contrary to myth-making by numerous later writers—absolutely no indications that his Jewish origins played any role whatsoever in his predicament.

However, he does note some of the underlying social context to this fierce political battle. Although only one Frenchman in a thousand was Jewish, just a few years earlier a group of Jews had been the leading culprits behind several huge financial scandals that impoverished large numbers of small investors, and the swindlers afterward escaped any punishment by means of political influence and bribery. Given this history, much of the outrage of the anti-Dreyfusards probably arose from their fears that a Jewish military spy from a very wealthy family might be able to walk free using similar tactics, and the public claims that Dreyfus’s brother was offering enormous bribes to win his brother’s release certainly strengthened this concern.

Lindemann’s discussion of the 1913 Leo Frank Affair, in which a wealthy Northern Jew working in Atlanta was accused of sexually-assaulting and murdering a young girl, is even more interesting. Once again, he notes that contrary to the traditional narrative, there seems absolutely no hint that Frank’s Jewish background played any role in his arrest or conviction. Indeed, at his trial it was instead his very highly-paid defense attorneys who unsuccessfully sought to “play the race card” with the jurors by crudely attempting to deflect suspicion upon a local black worker by means of racially-charged invective.

Although Lindemann regards Frank as probably innocent, my own reading of the evidence he presents suggests the overwhelming likelihood of his guilt. Meanwhile, it seems undeniable that the outpouring of popular anger against Frank was produced by the vast ocean of outside Jewish money—at least $15 million or more in present-day dollars—that was committed to the legal efforts to save the life of someone widely regarded as a brutal murderer. There are strong suggestions that far more improper means were also employed, including bribery and influence-peddling, so that after Frank was convicted by a jury of his peers and thirteen separate legal appeals were denied, a governor with strong personal ties to the defense lawyers and Jewish interests chose to spare Frank’s life a few months before leaving office. Under these circumstances, the lynch-mob that hung Frank was viewed by the community as merely enforcing his official death sentence by extra-judicial means.

I also discovered that the leading figures in the anti-Frank movement had views far nuanced than I had expected. For example, populist writer Tom Watson had previously been a strong defender of Jewish anarchist Emma Goldman, while ferociously denouncing the Rockefellers, Morgans, and Goulds as the “true destroyers” of Jeffersonian democracy, so his outrage that Frank might escape punishment for murder seemed motivated by the extreme wealth of Frank’s family and his supporters rather than any pre-existing anti-Semitic sentiments.

The unmistakable conclusion of Lindemann’s analysis is that if the defendants in both the Dreyfus and Frank cases had not been Jewish, they would have suffered identical arrests and convictions, but lacking any wealthy and politically mobilized Jewish community to rally around them, they would have received their punishments, just or unjust, and immediately been forgotten. Instead, Theodor Herzl, the founding father of Zionism, later claimed that the massive anti-Semitism revealed by the Dreyfus Affair was the basis of his personal ideological awakening, while the Frank Affair led to the establishment of America’s Anti-Defamation League. And both these cases have entered our history books as among the most notorious examples of pre-World War I anti-Semitism.

 

Lindemann’s discussion of the often difficult relations between Russia’s restive Jewish minority and its huge Slavic majority is also quite interesting, and he provides numerous instances in which major incidents, supposedly demonstrating the enormously strong appeal of vicious anti-Semitism, were quite different than has been suggested by the legend. The famous Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 was obviously the result of severe ethnic tension in that city, but contrary to the regular accusations of later writers, there seems absolutely no evidence of high-level government involvement, and the widespread claims of 700 dead that so horrified the entire world were grossly exaggerated, with only 45 killed in the urban rioting. Chaim Weizmann, the future president of Israel, later promoted the story that he himself and some other brave Jewish souls had personally defended their people with revolvers in hand even as they saw the mutilated bodies of 80 Jewish victims. This account was totally fictional since Weizmann happened to have been be hundreds of miles away when the riots occurred.

Although a tendency to lie and exaggerate was hardly unique to the political partisans of Russian Jewry, the existence of a powerful international network of Jewish journalists and Jewish-influenced media outlets ensured that such concocted propaganda stories might receive enormous worldwide distribution, while the truth followed far behind, if at all.

For related reasons, international outrage was often focused on the legal confinement of most of Russia’s Jews to the “Pale of Settlement,” suggesting some sort of tight imprisonment; but that area was the traditional home of the Jewish population and encompassed a landmass almost as large as France and Spain combined. The growing impoverishment of Eastern European Jews during that era was often assumed to be a consequence of hostile government policy, but the obvious explanation was extraordinary Jewish fecundity, which far outstripped that of their Slavic fellow countrymen, and quickly led them to outgrow the available spots in any of their traditional “middleman” occupations, a situation worsened by their total disinclination to engage in agriculture or other primary-producer activities. Jewish communities expressed horror at the risk of losing their sons to the Czarist military draft, but this was simply the flip-side of the full Russian citizenship they had been granted, and no different from what was faced by their non-Jewish neighbors.

Certainly the Jews of Russia suffered greatly from widespread riots and mob attacks in the generation prior to World War I, and these did sometimes have substantial government encouragement, especially in the aftermath of the very heavy Jewish role in the 1905 Revolution. But we should keep in mind that a Jewish plotter had been implicated in the killing of Czar Alexander II, and Jewish assassins had also struck down several top Russian ministers and numerous other government officials. If the last decade or two had seen American Muslims assassinate a sitting U.S. President, various leading Cabinet members, and a host of our other elected and appointed officials, surely the position of Muslims in this country would have become a very uncomfortable one.

As Lindemann candidly describes the tension between Russia’s very rapidly growing Jewish population and its governing authorities, he cannot avoid mentioning the notorious Jewish reputation for bribery, corruption, and general dishonesty, with numerous figures of all political backgrounds noting that the remarkable Jewish propensity to commit perjury in the courtroom led to severe problems in the effective administration of justice. The eminent American sociologist E.A. Ross, writing in 1913, characterized the regular behavior of Eastern European Jews in very similar terms.

Lindemann also allocates a short chapter to discussing the 1911 Beilis Affair, in which a Ukrainian Jew was accused of the ritual murder of a young Gentile boy, an incident that generated a great deal of international attention and controversy. Based on the evidence presented, the defendant seems likely to have been innocent, although the obvious lies he repeatedly told police interrogators hardly helped foster that impression, and “the system worked” in that he was ultimately found innocent by the jurors at his trial. However, a few pages are also given to a much less well-known ritual murder case in late 19th century Hungary, in which the evidence of Jewish guilt seemed far stronger, though the author hardly accepted the possible reality of such an outlandish crime. Such reticence was quite understandable since the publication of Ariel Toaff’s remarkable volume on the subject was still a dozen years in the future.

 

ORDER IT NOW

Lindemann subsequently expanded his examination of historical anti-Semitism into a much broader treatment, Esau’s Tears, which appeared in 1997. In this volume, he added comparative studies of the social landscape in Germany, Britain, Italy, and several other European countries, and demonstrated that the relationship between Jews and non-Jews varied greatly across different locations and time periods. But although I found his analysis quite useful and interesting, the extraordinarily harsh attacks his text provoked from some outraged Jewish academics seemed even more intriguing.

For example, Judith Laikin Elkin opened her discussion in The American Historical Review by describing the book as a “545-page polemic” a strange characterization of a book so remarkably even-handed and factually-based in its scholarship. Writing in Commentary, Robert Wistrich was even harsher, stating that merely reading the book had been a painful experience for him, and his review seemed filled with spittle-flecked rage. Unless these individuals had somehow gotten copies of a different book, I found their attitudes simply astonishing.

I was not alone in such a reaction. Richard S. Levy of the University of Illinois, a noted scholar of anti-Semitism, expressed amazement at Wistrich’s seemingly irrational outburst, while Paul Gottfried, writing in Chronicles, mildly suggested that Lindemann had “touched raw nerves.” Indeed, Gottfried’s own evaluation quite reasonably criticized Lindemann for perhaps being a little too even-handed, sometimes presenting numerous conflicting analyzes without choosing between them. For those interested, a good discussion of the book by Alan Steinweis, a younger scholar specializing in the same topic, is conveniently available online.

The remarkable ferocity with which some Jewish writers attacked Lindemann’s meticulous attempt to provide an accurate history of anti-Semitism may carry more significance than merely an exchange of angry words in low-circulation academic publications. If our mainstream media shapes our reality, scholarly books and articles based upon them tend to set the contours of that media coverage. And the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them.

ORDER IT NOW

The undeniable truth is that for many centuries Jews usually constituted a wealthy and privileged segment of the population in nearly all the European countries in which they resided, and quite frequently they based their livelihood upon the heavy exploitation of a downtrodden peasantry. Even without any differences in ethnicity, language, or religion, such conditions almost invariably provoke hostility. The victory of Mao’s Communist forces in China was quickly followed by the brutal massacre of a million or more Han Chinese landlords by the Han Chinese poor peasants who regarded them as cruel oppressors, with William Hinton’s classic Fanshen describing the unfortunate history that unfolded in one particular village. When similar circumstances led to violent clashes in Eastern Europe between Slavs and Jews, does it really make logical sense to employ a specialized term such as “anti-Semitism” to describe that situation?

Furthermore, some of the material presented in Lindemann’s rather innocuous text might also lead to potentially threatening ideas. Consider, for example, the notorious Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, almost certainly fictional, but hugely popular and influential during the years following World War I and the Bolshevik Revolution. The fall of so many longstanding Gentile dynasties and their replacement by new regimes such as Soviet Russia and Weimar Germany, which were heavily dominated by their tiny Jewish minorities, quite naturally fed suspicions of a worldwide Jewish plot, as did the widely discussed role of Jewish international bankers in producing those political outcomes.

Over the decades, there has been much speculation about the possible inspiration for the Protocols, but although Lindemann makes absolutely no reference to that document, he does provide a very intriguing possible candidate. Jewish-born British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli certainly ranked as one of the most influential figures of the late 19th century, and in his novel Coningsby, he has the character representing Lord Lionel Rothschild boast about the existence of a vast and secret network of powerful international Jews, who stand near the head of almost every major nation, quietly controlling their governments from behind the scenes. If one of the world’s most politically well-connected Jews eagerly promoted such notions, was Henry Ford really so unreasonable in doing the same?

Lindemann also notes Disraeli’s focus on the extreme importance of race and racial origins, a central aspect of traditional Jewish religious doctrine. He reasonably suggests that this must surely have had a huge influence upon the rise of those political ideas, given that Disraeli’s public profile and stature were so much greater than the mere writers or activists whom our history books usually place at center stage. In fact, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, a leading racial theorist, actually cited Disraeli as a key source for his ideas. Jewish intellectuals such as Max Nordau and Cesare Lombroso are already widely recognized as leading figures in the rise of the racial science of that era, but Disraeli’s under-appreciated role may have actually been far greater. The deep Jewish roots of European racialist movements are hardly something that many present-day Jews would want widely known.

 

One of the harsh Jewish critics of Esau’s Tears denounced Cambridge University Press for even allowing the book to appear in print, and although that major work is easily available in English, there are numerous other cases where an important but discordant version of historical reality has been successfully blocked from publication. For decades most Americans would have ranked Nobel Laureate Alexander Solzhenitsyn as among the world’s greatest literary figures, and his Gulag Archipelago alone sold over 10 million copies. But his last work was a massive two-volume account of the tragic 200 years of shared history between Russians and Jews, and despite its 2002 release in Russian and numerous other world languages, there has yet to be an authorized English translation, though various partial editions have circulated on the Internet in samizdat form.

ORDER IT NOW

At one point, a full English version was briefly available for sale at Amazon.com and I purchased it. Glancing through a few sections, the work seemed quite even-handed and innocuous to me, but it seemed to provide a far more detailed and uncensored account than anything else previously available, which obviously was the problem. The Bolshevik Revolution resulted in the deaths of many tens of millions of people worldwide, and the overwhelming Jewish role in its leadership would become more difficult to erase from historical memory if Solzhenitsyn’s work were easily available. Also, his candid discussion of the economic and political behavior of Russian Jewry in pre-revolutionary times directly conflicted with the hagiography widely promoted by Hollywood and the popular media. Historian Yuri Slezkine’s award-winning 2004 book The Jewish Century provided many similar facts, but his treatment was far more cursory and his public stature not remotely the same.

Near the end of his life, Solzhenitsyn gave his political blessing to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Russia’s leaders honored him upon his death, while his Gulag volumes are now enshrined as mandatory reading in the standard high school curriculum of today’s overwhelmingly Christian Russia. But even as his star rose again in his own homeland, it seems to have sharply fallen in our own country, and his trajectory may eventually relegate him to nearly un-person status.

A couple of years after the release of Solzhenitsyn’s controversial final book, an American writer named Anne Applebaum published a thick history bearing the same title Gulag, and her work received enormously favorable media coverage and won her a Pulitzer Prize; I have even heard claims that her book has been steadily replacing that earlier Gulag on many college reading lists. But although Jews constituted a huge fraction of the top leadership of the Soviet Gulag system during its early decades, as well as that of the dreaded NKVD which supplied the inmates, nearly her entire focus on her own ethnic group during Soviet times is that of victims rather than victimizers. And by a remarkable irony of fate, she shares a last name with one of the top Bolshevik leaders, Hirsch Apfelbaum, who concealed his own ethnic identity by calling himself Grigory Zinoviev.

ORDER IT NOW

The striking decline in Solzhenitsyn’s literary status in the West came just a decade or two after an even more precipitous collapse in the reputation of David Irving, and for much the same reason. Irving probably ranked as the most internationally successful British historian of the last one hundred years and a renowned scholar of World War II, but his extensive reliance on primary source documentary evidence posed an obvious threat to the official narrative promoted by Hollywood and wartime propaganda. When he published his magisterial Hitler’s War, this conflict between myth and reality came into the open, and an enormous wave of attacks and vilification was unleashed, gradually leading to his purge from respectability and eventually even his imprisonment.

ORDER IT NOW

Similarly, Israeli academic Ariel Toaff, son of the chief rabbi of Rome, was regarded as one of the world’s leading scholarly authorities on Medieval Jewry. But when he published his remarkable 2004 analysis suggesting the likely reality of the Jewish ritual murders of Christian children throughout history, the resulting media firestorm forced the cancellation of the book’s publication, and the work only survives in samizdat form, while there were even calls for his arrest and incarceration.

In other cases, pressure from the ADL and similar Jewish activist groups have led Amazon to completely eliminate entire categories of historical analysis and ban those publishers who produce such works, which drastically reduces their availability to the reading public.

All of these cases were the sort of high-profile examples which are well-known to anyone who pays attention to such matters. But surely there must have been many other incidents, involving far less prominent authors, which never received any significant media coverage, and also a vastly larger universe of cases in which writers have self-censored their texts in order to avoid such controversies. Over the decades, I have gradually discovered through sad experience that I must exercise extreme caution whenever I read anything relating to the subjects of Jews, Judaism, or Israel.

 

These important examples may help to explain the puzzling contrast between the behavior of Jews in the aggregate and Jews as individuals. Observers have noticed that even fairly small Jewish minorities may often have a major impact upon the far larger societies that host them. But on the other hand, in my experience at least, a large majority of individual Jews do not seem all that different in their personalities or behavior than their non-Jewish counterparts. So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.

We live our lives constantly immersed in media narratives, and these allow us to decide the rights and wrongs of a situation. The vast majority of people, Jew and Gentile alike, are far more likely to take strong action if they are convinced that their cause is a just one. This is obviously the basis for war-time propaganda.

Now suppose that a relatively small number of zealous Jewish partisans are known to always attack and denounce journalists or authors who accurately describe Jewish misbehavior. Over time, this ongoing campaign of intimidation may cause many important facts to be left on the cutting-room floor, or even gradually expel from mainstream respectability those writers who refuse to conform to such pressures. Meanwhile, similar small numbers of Jewish partisans frequently exaggerate the misdeeds committed against Jews, sometimes piling their exaggerations upon past exaggerations already produced by a previous round of such zealots.

Eventually, these two combined trends may take a complex and possibly very mixed historical record and transform it into a simple morality-play, with innocent Jews tremendously injured by vicious Jew-haters. And as this morality-play becomes established it deepens the subsequent intensity of other Jewish-activists, who redouble their demands that the media “stop vilifying Jews” and covering up the supposed evils inflicted upon them. An unfortunate circle of distortion following exaggeration following distortion can eventually produce a widely accepted historical account that bears little resemblance to the reality of what actually happened.

So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger.

Furthermore, this situation is exacerbated by the common tendency of Jews to “cluster” together, perhaps respresenting just one or two percent of the total population, but often constituting 20% or 40% or 60% of their immediate peer-group, especially in certain professions. Under such conditions, the ideas or emotional agitation of some Jews probably permeates others around them, often provoking additional waves of indignation.

As a rough analogy, a small quantity of uranium is relatively inert and harmless, and entirely so if distributed within low-density ore. But if a significant quantity of weapons-grade uranium is sufficiently compressed, then the neutrons released by fissioning atoms will quickly cause additional atoms to undergo fission, with the ultimate result of that critical chain-reaction being a nuclear explosion. In similar fashion, even a highly agitated Jew may have no negative impact, but if the collection of such agitated Jews becomes too numerous and clusters together too closely, they may work each other into a terrible frenzy, perhaps with disastrous consequences both for themselves and for their larger society. This is especially true if those agitated Jews begin to dominate certain key nodes of top-level control, such as the central political or media organs of a society.

Whereas most living organizations exist solely in physical reality, human beings also occupy an ideational space, with the interaction of human consciousness and perceived reality playing a major role in shaping behavior. Just as the pheromones released by mammals or insects can drastically affect the reactions of their family members or nest-mates, the ideas secreted by individuals or the media-emitters of a society can have an enormous impact upon their fellows.

A cohesive, organized group generally possesses huge advantages over a teeming mass of atomized individuals, just as a Macedonian Phalanx could easily defeat a vastly larger body of disorganized infantry. Many years ago, on some website somewhere I came across a very insightful comment regarding the obvious connection between “anti-Semitism” and “racism,” which our mainstream media organs identify as two of the world’s greatest evils. Under this analysis, “anti-Semitism” represents the tendency to criticize or resist Jewish social cohesion, while “racism” represents the attempt of white Gentiles to maintain a similar social cohesion of their own. To the extent that the ideological emanations from our centralized media organs serve to strengthen and protect Jewish cohesion while attacking and dissolving any similar cohesion on the part of their Gentile counterparts, the former will obviously gain enormous advantages in resource-competition against the latter.

Religion obviously constitutes an important unifying factor in human social groups and we cannot ignore the role of Judaism in this regard. Traditional Jewish religious doctrine seems to consider Jews as being in a state of permanent hostility with all non-Jews, and the use of dishonest propaganda is an almost inevitable aspect of such conflict. Furthermore, since Jews have invariably been a small political minority, maintaining such controversial tenets required the employment of a massive framework of subterfuge and dissimulation in order to conceal their nature from the larger society surrounding them. It has often been said that truth is the first casualty in war, and surely the cultural influences of over a thousand years of such intense religious hostility may continue to quietly influence the thinking of many modern Jews, even those who have largely abandoned their religious beliefs.

The notorious Jewish tendency to shamelessly lie or wildly exaggerate has sometimes had horrifying human consequences. I very recently discovered a fascinating passage in Peter Moreira’s 2014 book The Jew Who Defeated Hitler: Henry Morgenthau Jr., FDR, and How We Won the War, focused on the important political role of that powerful Secretary of the Treasury.

A turning point in Henry Morgenthau Jr.’s relationship with the Jewish community came in November 1942, when Rabbi Stephen Wise came to the corner office to tell the secretary what was happening in Europe. Morgenthau knew of the millions of deaths and the lampshades made from victims’ skin, and he asked Wise not to go into excessive details. But Wise went on to tell of the barbarity of the Nazis, how they were making soap out of Jewish flesh. Morgenthau, turning paler, implored him, “Please, Stephen, don’t give me the gory details.” Wise went on with his list of horrors and Morgenthau repeated his plea over and over again. Henrietta Klotz was afraid her boss would keel over. Morgenthau later said the meeting changed his life.

It is easy to imagine that Morgenthau’s gullible acceptance of such obviously ridiculous war-time atrocity stories played a major role when he later lent his name and support to remarkably brutal American occupation policies that probably led to the postwar deaths of many millions of innocent German civilians.

Related Reading:

 
The American Pravda Series
Hide 666 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous[221] • Disclaimer says:

    @Ron Unz

    If you really want your mind blown, read Voluptuous Panic by Mel Gordon. It covers the Weimar Republic and how debauched they were. Everything from mother daughter prostitute teams, to a lot of gay sex, to pedo stuff too.

    It was so over the top I couldn’t believe it. But at the same time we are starting to see the parallels here in America. Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry. I would like you to cover this sexual angle in a future article.

  2. utu says:

    OMG, RU compared Jews to uranium.

    • Replies: @Real K5
    , @Anon
  3. Dr. Pol says:

    /pol/ was right again.

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  4. RobinG says:

    This film is a smart take-down of the anti-Semitism charade, made with humor and a light touch. While deftly revealing the absurdity, it manages to entertain.

    “Defamation” – An Israeli’s examination of the ADL and anti-Semitism

    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
    , @Chu
  5. Anon[413] • Disclaimer says:

    Chaim Weizman, the future president of Israel, later promoted the story

    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @phil
    , @cassandra
  6. Peasant says:

    I am curious as to what Mr Unz thinks of Dov Bechhofer an orthodox Jew who was recently doxed for being a supporter of White nationalism?

    see here

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/07/dov-bechhofer-did-nothing-wrong/

  7. Anon[208] • Disclaimer says:

    Still reading…. On the fly “Coningsby” not “Conigsby” (btw have you got any Hitler or other Nazi references to it?)

    I sought, by Googling, to see if Em Prof Albert S. Lindemann was/is, as I thought till I looked up “Walter Lindemann, Lord Cherwell” and found what Wiki says about the great Frederick (sic) Lindemann, Jewish. I still don’t know as the Wikipedia entry is somehow mysteriously “archived”. Is this a known condition? I don’t suppose Albert S. is Jewish…. Pity.

  8. Brilliant! Simply brilliant description and reasoning!!!!

  9. With bated breath we eagerly await the 50 megaton ‘Tsar Bomba’ American Pravda the Holocaust.

    Although a tendency to lie and exaggerate was hardly unique to the political partisans of Russian(International) Jewry, the existence of a powerful international network of Jewish journalists and Jewish-influenced media outlets ensured that such concocted propaganda stories might receive enormous worldwide distribution, while the truth followed far behind, if at all.

    Just change a word in your quote Russian to international and we’re talking about the Holocaust.

    the remarkable Jewish propensity to commit perjury in the courtroom led to severe problems in the effective administration of justice.

    That would be Nuremburg.

    Morgenthau knew of the millions of deaths and the lampshades made from victims’ skin, and he asked Wise not to go into excessive details. But Wise went on to tell of the barbarity of the Nazis, how they were making soap out of Jewish flesh

    But we’re led to believe that millions of Jews were gassed to death in primitive brickhouses with wooden doors another fairy tale like lampshades and soap.

    • Replies: @Abbybwood
    , @Heros
  10. Wally says:

    Unz said:
    “… the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them.”

    The absolute best examples of that are the fake ’6M Jews and gas chambers”, forgetting for the moment the equally fraudulent ’5M others’ used by Jews to essentially buy votes for their agenda.

    It’s quite bizarre that Jews actually want 6M Jews to be dead. Revisionists bring Jews good news. Jews should be elated to know that 6,000,000 of their brethren were not murdered.

    Truth can no longer be stopped. Regardless of “Holocau$t Industry” lies, their religion does not hold up to scientific, rational scrutiny.

    Be part of the solution:
    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    • Replies: @mcohen
    , @Sic Semper
    , @Moi
  11. Anonymous[413] • Disclaimer says:

    Even without any differences in ethnicity, language, or religion, such conditions almost invariably provoke hostility….. When similar circumstances led to violent clashes in Eastern Europe between Slavs and Jews, does it really make logical sense to employ a specialized term such as “anti-Semitism” to describe that situation?

    Good question.

    Certainly the Jews of Russia suffered greatly from widespread riots and mob attacks in the generation prior to World War I.

    Certainly individual Jews suffered harm as a result of the inter-class or inter-ethnic conflict of that period. Is it really accurate though to describe “the Jews of Russia” as having suffered, much less “suffered greatly”? How does it look when one takes into account the frequency and magnitude of such incidents in the context of the expanse of geography and extent of decades within which they occurred (meaning that there were also vast stretches of time therein in which Jews were just living their lives)? How does that description square with the description of a population as being relatively prosperous compared to the Slavs and experiencing a remarkable surge of fecundity?

    I’ve heard that John Doyle Klier’s work on the Russian pogroms is interesting, if you aren’t already familiar with it.

  12. So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.

    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion—mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever “the holocaust” may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

  13. Wally says:
    @Anon

    Indeed.

    “We reached the [Balfour] Declaration not by miracles, but through persistent propaganda, through unceasing demonstration of the life force of our people. We told the responsible authorities: We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not. You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.”

    - World Zionist leader [1st President of Israël] Chaim Weizmann, speech in Jerusalem, December 1919.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @DF
  14. Bill P says:

    Some enjoyable prose in this piece. I like the image of people “secreting” ideas.

    I tend to identify religion as the fundamental issue here. Judaism and Christianity are not compatible over the long term. Over time, religions probably select for certain personality traits and have some genetic influence on populations. I suspect this has happened with Jews. People suggest Amish have self-selected for plainness; maybe Jews have selected for zeal.

    And maybe, when Jews become comfortable and secular and begin to mix more and more with gentiles in host countries, this zeal starts to fade. That seems to have happened in the USSR, and it’s probably happening here in the US outside of the Orthodox population.

    It isn’t a racial issue, because Jews aren’t really a race. They’re pretty much a standard east Mediterranean population with some degree of European ancestry. They may have been more endogamous than most, but probably no more so than Icelandic people or Finns.

    They are a people who shaped themselves with their faith, and they are not the only example of that. Take the influence of Confucius on China, for example. It seems reasonable to me that a couple thousand years of Confucianism has left its mark on the Chinese people.

    The problem is that Christians have shaped themselves on different values and concepts. At times, this has caused a lot of trouble between the two peoples. Maybe then Zionism really is a pretty reasonable solution.

  15. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:

    I can’t believe he’s on with the blood libel thing again.

    The internet acronym SMH was made for this.

    As was the football phrase “own goal”..

  16. renfro says:

    Unz has given us a accurate, dispassionate summation on what is called anti Semitism.
    Well done.

    I am curious how those here who dislike Jews came to that dislike. From comments it seems that Jewish ‘politics’ (interference in US policies & Israel) and their control of most of our press, media (the censorship, slants and lowering of social and moral standards) are the two main complaints.
    For me it grew after I began a study of the Mid East post 911 and came across a section about Zionism in the ME in the British National Archives. That led me back to the US and the Jewish lobby and thru Jewish activities in the US beginning even before 1948. I absolutely did not want to believe that a Jewish or any other ‘cabal’ was controlling much of our government….but that is the way the cookie crumbled on the facts. And these ‘facts’ did not come from books, they came from months and months and months, years actually, of combing thru documents at the Library of Congress, every bill and resolution passed dealing with Jewish interest and Israel, every presidential library, all the MOUs and declassified documents and on and on.

    The only question I have had since then is what do we do about it? We have to end Jewish entitlement in the US before we can end the unholy US-Israel relationship.

    One thing I want to add to this:

    So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger.

    Is that the ordinary Jews will never stand up to the Fifth Column Jews because even the ordinary Jews benefit too much from the uber Jews hold on our government. I could go on and on about the many special favors US Jews get, the 90% of Homeland Security funds, the extra social services government money awarded ‘only’ to Jewish organizations, …..I could fill this entre site with all the gifts congress has given to the Jews courtesy of US taxpayers. You can even find awards to Jewish groups in various politicians ‘earmarks’ for gawds sake…..people have no idea, none at all about how truly deep they go into our tax money thru every agency in the US. It even involves ‘promoting Jews’ , as when Schumer several years ago required the pentagon to review records of all Jews serving in WWII and come up with some ‘heroes’ who didn’t get medals because of anti semitism.

    I would love to see Ron put his extra sharp mind to some research and do an article on this alone.

    Bottom line the Jews aren’t going to give up their special benefits. But maybe if enough ‘ordinary Americans’ learn that they are ‘not special and are third class citizens’ below the Entitled Jews they will rise up and get loud.

  17. But thinking it over, I’m not sure that I can ever recall a single real-life instance I’ve personally encountered, nor have I heard of almost any such cases from my friends or acquaintances.

    That’s basically what Michael Wolffsohn, German jew and historian, says day in day out. Instead of going after the obviously antisemitic (and anit-western, anti-democatric, anti-liberal)) islamists in Europe, the officials rather try to hunt down nice young blonde Lauren Southern for example as being “racist” for displaying “Allah is a Gay god” posters in (pretty moselm) Luton and ban her from entering the UK with the help of the “UK Terrorism Act”!

  18. Roy Bauer says:

    Hello Mr. Unz.

    I’ll just post this here:

    holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com

    I hope that your moderators will leave it up in the spirit of free discussion. I would love for someone to go through this document and debunk it if it is false.

    Good day.

    • Replies: @phil
  19. @Anon

    If prof Lindemann, Churchill’s scientific advisor, later Lord Cherwell, was a jew, opinions were divided.
    His mother was jewish, if she already was jewish before her marriage to a jew, is uncertain.
    Lindemann’s father, his mother’s second marriage, was not a jew.
    But his father was financed by a Rothschild.
    Lindemann on the one hand was known for his antisemitic jokes, on the other for his hatred of Hitler Germany.
    His misuse of a scientific study by Solly Zuckermann on the bombing of Coventry convinced Churchill that bombing the German civilian population was the thing to do.
    Jones, of British scientific counter espionage made fun of Lindemann about Lindemann, a physics professor, denial of the existence of the VII.
    As Jones said, Churchill present ‘if the British had no idea how to do it, maybe the Germans did’.
    After WWII Zuckermann learned about the misuse of his Coventry report, in his biography he writes that the bombing of German civilians harmed GB more than Germany, and prolonged the war.
    Churchill never forgave Jones.
    R.V. Jones, ´Most secret war, British Scientific Intelligence 1939 – 1945’, 1978, 1979, London
    Solly Zuckermann, ‘From Apes to Warlords, an autobiography, 1904- 46’, London 1988
    Adrian Fort, ´PROF, The Life of Frederick Lindemann´, London 2003
    The Earl of Birkenhead, ‘The Prof in Two Worlds, The official life of Professor F. A. Lindemann’, Viscount Cherwell, London, 1961
    C.P.Snow, ´Science and government’, 1961, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    • Troll: utu
    • Replies: @Ivan
  20. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:

    @Ron Unz

    Another article of interest. I didn’t know pedofelia was so prevalent amongst Jews, especially religious Jews. Of course in popular culture it is always the Catholic church that gets the blame. Makes me wonder if the church was maybe infiltrated by crypto Jews to do damage to the trust gentiles have with the church.

    The below link is a prime example of Jews being victims of their debauchery. With no one to call them out, is it any wonder this is happening? Bravo to Unz for being a brave man.

    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/qbe8bp/the-child-rape-assembly-line-0000141-v20n11

    • Replies: @j2
    , @Herro Worrd
  21. In the article I did not see the distinction usually made between antijudaism, and antisemitism.
    The watershed is seen in the 19th century when, on the one hand many jews stopped being religious, on the other getting equal right almost everywhere.
    The one and only jewish historian explaining anti semitism I know is
    ‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA.
    Katz mentions things like ‘close economic cooperation, intermarriage, ostentious life styles’.

    What the close economic cooperation caused was maybe demonstrated in Lithuania, where most jews were massacred before the German troops arrived.’
    The UNESCO, if I remember well, around 2000 gave money for the retauration of the ghetto of Vilnius, in itself an interesting place to see it when I saw it, 2003 or so, in ruins, very small, no ostentatious houses, and what I supposed to have been a synagogue with a floor digged out.
    I suppose there was a maximum building height, by lowering the floor inside more height was attained.

    Anyhow, when the UNESCO money was about to come the question was asked in the Lithuanian parliament ‘if the Luthianians again should become the slaves of jews’, something like that.
    Dan Jacobson, ‘Heshels Rijk Familiekroniek’, Amsterdam 1998; the massacres described.
    Lonely Planet Guide ‘Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania’, Nicola Williams, Debra Herrmann, Cathryn Kemp, 2003, Victoria, Australia; the question in parliament.

    I suppose jews see me as an antisemite, I see myself just as someone who criticises jewish behaviour, certainly not of all jews.
    On the contrary, I see the majority of jewry as victims, of their identity, and of maybe, in my estimate, of no more that a few thousand jews, people like neocons, Soros, Netanyahu, etc.
    I still am of the same opinion of what around 1890 one Rothschild wrote to another ‘the only enemy of jews is jews’.

  22. Caruthers says:

    “Many years ago, on some website somewhere I came across a very insightful comment regarding the obvious connection between “anti-Semitism” and “racism,” which our mainstream media organs identify as two of the world’s greatest evils. Under this analysis, “anti-Semitism” represents the tendency to criticize or resist Jewish social cohesion, while “racism” represents the attempt of white Gentiles to maintain a similar social cohesion of their own. ”
    This is a phenomenon I have often observed. It’s “racist” and “bigoted” for a person of European “gentile” ancestry to care about or discriminate on the basis of common ancestry, but “antisemitic” (and hence bigoted and racist) to object to when Jews care about or discriminate on the basis of common ancestry.
    The word “antisemitic” should be stricken from the lexicon. “Racist”—-meaning discrimination based on background/ancestry——should suffice.

    • Replies: @Dan
  23. the media-emitters of a society can have an enormous impact

    A cohesive, organized group generally possesses huge advantages over a teeming mass of atomized individuals, just as a Macedonian Phalanx could easily defeat a vastly larger body of disorganized infantry.

    To the extent that the ideological emanations from our centralized media organs serve to strengthen and protect Jewish cohesion while attacking and dissolving any similar cohesion on the part of their Gentile counterparts, the former will obviously gain enormous advantages in resource-competition against the latter.

    These three statements represent very important ideas that I’ve been thinking about lately.

    1. Control the media and you can control what the society believes.
    2. Social atomization and hyper-individuality make a group relatively weak against a more socially unified group.
    3. Group competition is mostly about resource competition. Groups compete for resources.

    You seem to be saying that Jews want to weaken gentile unity (while maintaining Jewish cohesiveness). If gentiles are atomized/divided and Jews are united, Jews can more easily dominate lucrative resource niches and thrive as a tribe. Almost like a divide and conquer strategy.

    • Replies: @Sic Semper
  24. ‘From prejudice to destruction, Anti-Semitism 1700-1933’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA

    Katz is/was professor of Jewish Educational and Social History, Emeritus, at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    Below is the end of the chapter, on the emergence of anti-Semitism, in Germany, around 1870.
    Scholars distinguish between anti Judaism, before Jews in most West European countries were granted equal rights, around 1800, and anti-Semitism, what began around 1870.

    Page 258, chapter ‘The incubation’.
    ‘The decisive factor in the anti-Semitic eruption was the failure to fulfil the condition upon which the eradication of Gentile suspicions of Jews had been predicated, namely, the disappearance of the tightly knit Jewish community. Far from disappearing, this community only assumed a new metamorphosis, not all aspects of which were regarded favourably by the Gentiles. Though Jews now were active inside German society, in economic life, culture, and politics, they nevertheless remained conspicuous as a group. Their pursuits, never centrally planned or directed, were determined by historical and sociological factors…….
    And despite their integration, they stood out as a closely knit group’.

    Page 259
    ‘What remained unimpaired was Jewish inbreeding, the maintaining of exclusively Jewish family ties. This, and the residues of that religious nonconformity, comparative economic co-operation, and social isolation, and some cultural peculiarity gave the Jewish group a special physiognomy. If the group was different from what it had been a century before, it certainly had not assumed the characteristics expected by those who propounded the idea of fusion with Christian society.

    Thus, instead of completely disappearing as expected, the Jewish community merely underwent a transformation. And the old stereotypes were now revived. The wait-and-see attitude of the Gentile population, which involved the concealment and suppression of anti-Jewish sentiment, turned into overt resentment. This was the point at which anti-Semitism boiled over’.

    End of chapter.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  25. Dreyfus affair was a fake incedent or hoax designed to create a public anti-semitism controversy.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @ploni almoni
  26. @Anon

    Benjamin Disraeli, ‘Coningsby’, 1844, 1983, Harmondsworth
    Only indirect ‘England ist total verjudet’.
    Something like ‘completely judaized’.
    What is not true, as the following title already makes clear
    E. T. Raymond (Edward Raymond Thompson), ‘Disraeli: The Alien Patriot’, 1925, London

  27. JackOH says:

    You’re a pretty courageous guy, Ron.

    I’d like to see an enterprising academic or independent writer pull together the threads, and make the case that the careers of how the terms “anti-Semitism” and “racism” have come to be used have themselves enabled “compulsory philo-Semitism”, “anti-Christianity”, Black Supremacism, anti-White racism, self-censorship, and much narrowed possibilities for public debate to solve America’s problems. I’m sort of half-confident such a case can be made.

    For example, anti-Semitism = Auschwitz, racism = slavery–these “equations”, I think, have found a purchase within the popular political imagination by dint of popular novels and movies. You offer a sharp criticism of a particular Israeli policy or action, as Philip Giraldi has done, and whack, you’re an anti-Semite. You offer the opinion that many Black students may be better off in the manual trades, and whack, you’re a racist. Auschwitz, slavery. I’m caricaturing a bit, I suppose, but not by a whole lot.

  28. mcohen says:

    Obviously you would not publish again the ritual murder of christian children by orthodox rabbis story unless you had solid proof and sources.

    So

    1.where did they take place.country and town
    2.what were the names of the rabbis
    3.were they ever convicted
    4.did any other people besides jews commit the same crimes.
    5.do you understand the biblical story of abraham sacrificing a ram instead of his son

    • Replies: @res
  29. Usual stream-of-consciousness. I may agree with something with the author, disagree with him on other points, but- he has not stressed enough that “classical Jew” is alien to the West & there is no way of ignoring that (assimilated Jews are something different & they would need a separate & more nuanced analysis).

    “the Hebrews, a very recent people…an Arab horde”.

    Voltaire, referring to the Jews in op. cit., “Genèse”.

    “The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world”

    Johann Gottfried Herder
    , “Behkerung der Juden”,

    “The Jew is the enemy of the human race. This race must be sent back to Asia or exterminated”.

    Pierre Joseph Proudhon, “Selected Writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon”

    “The Palestinians living among us have, for the most part, earned a not-unfounded reputation for being cheaters, because of their spirit of usury since their exile. Certainly, it seems strange to conceive of a nation of cheaters; but it is just as odd to think of a nation of merchants, the great majority of whom, bound by an ancient superstition that is recognized by the State they live in, seek no civil dignity and try to make up for this loss by the advantage of duping the people among whom they find refuge, and even one another. The situation could not be otherwise, given a whole nation of merchants, as non-productive members of society (for example, the Jews in Poland). So their constitution, which is sanctioned by ancient precepts and even by the people among whom they live (since we have certain sacred writings in common with them), cannot consistently be abolished — even though the supreme principle of their morality in trading with us is “Let the buyer beware.” I shall not engage in the futile undertaking of lecturing to these people, in terms of morality, about cheating and honesty. Instead, I shall present my conjectures about the origin of this peculiar constitution (the constitution, namely, of a nation of merchants).”

    Immanuel Kant, from “Anthropology from the Pragmatic Viewpoint”

    Contempt for theory, art, history, and for man as an end in himself, which is contained in an abstract form in the Jewish religion, is the real, conscious standpoint, the virtue of the man of money. The species-relation itself, the relation between man and woman, etc., becomes an object of trade! The woman is bought and sold.

    The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.

    Karl Marx, On the Jewish Question

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @anonymous
  30. Thank you for your excellent and ongoing investigation of “the Jewish problem”.
    http://www.911nwo.com

  31. But we should keep in mind that a Jewish plotter had been implicated in the killing of Czar Alexander II, and Jewish assassins had also struck down several top Russian ministers and numerous other government officials.

    In the article you published by Anatoly Karlin ” The Russian Empire: Too Nice for Its Own Good ” ( September 26 2017 ), Mr K writes, “What Communist propagandists don’t like to mention as much is that just during the three years1904-1907 some 4,500 Tsarist officials were murdered by what would today be classified as Far Left terrorist groups.”

    It would be interesting to discover what percentage of those convicted of the murders were of Jewish origin.

    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    , @Anonymous
  32. Deschutes says:

    Wow this made for great, eye-opening reading! I often wondered about how the entire anti-semite narrative started before WWII, WWI and into the 19th century and how historically accurate it was. Quite revealing that when researchers such as Lindemann publish even handed research which calls into question the mainstream dominant narrative of widespread anti-semitism, they are viciously attacked by other Jewish scholars.

  33. As shown in this article, there is a significant difference in how American Jews and non-Jews view the state of Israel:

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2018/06/who-backs-israel.html

    White evangelical Christians’ support for the Jewish possession of Israel is higher than for any other religious group other than modern orthodox Jews and is nearly twice the level of religious Jewish support for the concept of a God-given promise of a Jewish homeland.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Cleburne
  34. ● On the Russian pogroms, John Doyle Klier, professor of modern Jewish history at University College London, examined the archival record and found that the stories of violence reaching the West were greatly exaggerated. He published the findings in his 2005 book, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-2. Andrew Joyce has written several times about Klier’s book, most recently in this article on the Occidental Observer site; go to the paragraph beginning, ‘It was only in the 2000s’.

    quite frequently they based their livelihood upon the heavy exploitation of a downtrodden peasantry

    As an example, in Chapter 5 of Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn quotes from a report presented to Tsar Alexander III in 1881: ‘Moreover, because of their [the Jews’] cohesion and solidarity, they have, with few exceptions, directed all their efforts not toward the increase of the productive strength of the state, but primarily toward the exploitation of the poorest classes of the surrounding population.’

    ● The PDF of a complete English translation of Two Hundred Years Together can be downloaded here.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  35. @Anonymous

    Pedophilia is a protected sacrament in the jewish community. There are thousands of victims in NY City with a sitting NY Governor and his NY Governor father having profited and protected a serial child rapist for decades. The media erases the cries of the victims and instead works to rehabilitate the public images of child rapists see Anderson Cooper of CNN/60 Minutes interview titled: An Unlikely Informant in 2015: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-informant-michael-blutrich-60-minutes/

    The most detailed examination of the relationship of two NY Governors, their political party and a serial child rapist was conducted in 1999 by an outraged ex-NYPD detective: https://www.scribd.com/document/327564828/USA-Confidential-December-1998

    This seminal investigation was cited by The American Spectator https://www.scribd.com/document/383369648/Banking-on-Cuomo
    as well as other newspapers during the ensuing conviction of said child rapist, not for serial raping children, but a $400 Million fraud where current NY Governor was personally appointed to the board of directors.

    No mention has been made of these stories in more than 20 years. The pleas of hundreds of victims are completely ignored by the media.

    • Replies: @Fidelios Automata
  36. Patricus says:

    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can’t find any.

  37. dearieme says:

    ‘Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, describing it as an “existential threat” to the Jewish community for the anti-Semitism it was fostering.’

    You need to tread carefully here. Corbyn’s far left mob seems indeed to include numerous anti-semites. I first noticed the strange business of leftie anti-semitism in the shower who took control of the Labour Party and the City Council in Dundee some decades ago. There is doubtless additionally what I might call ‘calculated anti-semitism’ i.e. an attempt to encourage moslems to the polls.

    And yet I agree with Labour’s refusal to be foisted with somebody else’s definition of anti-semitism, which definition looks to me to be a blatant attempt to censor political criticism of Israel. On a more rational, narrower definition, the Corbynistas still seem substantially anti-semitic to me, so the argument about definitions ought to be redundant. But because it is actually about Israel it is still pursued.

    On the internet I have been subject to accusations of anti-semitism. That’s because I am disinclined to toe the Israeli line on the history of Palestine and Israel/Palestine. Interestingly I have no memory of being accused of anti-semitism when I have opined that everything important in the Old Testament is absurd fiction. So the key matter seems to be politics – modern Israel – not Judaism.

    As for ‘Holocaust Denial’, it’s foolish or wicked to deny that Jews were murdered, presumably by the millions. No doubt lies have been told by members of the Holocaust Industry but that doesn’t mean that the slaughter didn’t happen. Making ‘Holocaust Denial’ a crime seems to me foolish or wicked too. As ever, the world is well provided with folly and evil.

  38. @Intelligent Dasein

    Ask any “unclean meat” – the real meaning of the kosher slander “goyim,” what it is like to be under their subjugation and harassment for a generation. Be it in, as Reverend Jesse Jackson appropriately labeled “Hymie Town” or a Palestinian confined to the open air death camp of Gaza – ask any of us our thoughts of the Holocaust™ – I assure you it is not as a “horror story” but a complete fabrication. Had it been real, a perfectly understandable solution likely too inefficient and lacking enough prosecutorial conviction to cure a long unchecked spreading malignancy.

    Until an unclean meat has prolonged interactions with the tribe, they cannot understand the all encompassing malevolence. No opportunity is spared to terrorize the goyim, no opportunity is spared in viciously attacking children, reputations, property and person. “Antisemitism” is the projection by jews onto every other people of what they themselves are guilty of doing to every other people.

    No act of Christian kindness is ever repaid in anything but slanderous calumnies, opportunistic profit and malignant manipulations – the embodiment of the shabbas goyim. A goyim represents an opportunity to practice thousands of years of Talmudic methodology of dehumanizing and victimizing outsiders.

    Jews Must Live and Now and Forever by Samuel Roth http://www.jrbooksonline.com/roth.htm was a complete admission of this by a disgusted jew.

    “The next time you read about a particularly bloody pogrom and pause to wonder how Christians, dedicated to a religion of mercy, can exercise so much brutality against the Jews, remember that the Jew wheedles all the mercy out of his neighbors in the ordinary course of business. He lies and cheats until he is caught. When caught, instead of accepting punishment, he moans and tears his hair, invokes the sores of ancestors in their graves and living relations at the point of death in hospitals, until the wronged gentile, nauseated, lets him go. Then, thumbing his nose at the gentile behind his back, the Jew goes about his business the same way, lying and cheating now doubly to make up for lost time. A pogrom is usually the climax of years of such relentless goading. Do you wonder that when the final reckoning comes the gentile is absolutely merciless?”
                –  Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live, Ch. 13, p. 206, f/n 31

    • Agree: Druid, Kolo
  39. “Eventually, these two combined trends may take a complex and possibly very mixed historical record and transform it into a simple morality-play, with innocent Jews tremendously injured by vicious Jew-haters.”

    This same dynamic has occurred with the historiography of the Spanish Civil War – the dominant narrative written and promulgated by the Left

    Eventually, these two combined trends may take a complex and possibly very mixed historical record and transform it into a simple morality-play, with innocent [democracy-loving-Republicans] tremendously injured by vicious [Francoist-Fascists].

    See: http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2017/10/has-spanish-civil-war-ended.html

    http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2015/05/santiago-carrillo-last-stalinist_51.html

  40. Real K5 says:
    @utu

    It is a metaphor and it works

  41. @renfro

    ” So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger. ”

    Who made this statement when ?
    Quite ordinary ways.
    Depends on what one sees as ordinary.

    Spinoza was thrown out of the Dutch sephardic community because he brought a business conflict to a Dutch judge, in stead of letting the rabbi decide.
    Both Solsjenytsyn and Hödl describe how jewish communities fought for their autonomy, resisted assimilation.
    Both German and Russian jews dodged military service, though in WWI many jews did fight in the German army.

    Present day Muslims not all of them, behave in a similar way in NW Europe.
    There simply seems to be a loyalty conflict.
    In an undercover tv report on Muslims in Denmark, from mosques, one could hear the sentence ‘w’re not Danes, w’re Muslims’.
    Sharia law was practiced in the mosques, as it is in present GB.

    About the other side of the ledger, Baruch describes his years supporting FDR as ‘Public Years’.
    He does not excuse himself in this autobiography.
    I’m quite sure that Soros is equally convinced of doing the right thing.
    So, I fear, for most jews there is no other side of the ledger.
    Bernard M. Baruch, ‘Die Jahre des Dienens’, München 1962 (The public years, New York, 1960)
    The german title is even more explicit ‘the years of service’.

    • Replies: @renfro
  42. @JohnnyWalker123

    I witness the kosher media apparatus along with its tendrils into the judiciary every single day. Tribal crimes are ignored in the media and their tendrils in the judiciary pull the strings in keeping the tribesman out of secular courts. Whereas goyim are viciously attacked in the media and scapegoated by the courts for far less than what their kosher masters do as entitlements.

    The only way to increase the power and wealth of an already unified and wealthy group is for that group to lord over broken and looted peoples. Breaking gentile eggs yields a bigger kosher omelet.

  43. @dearieme

    ” but that doesn’t mean that the slaughter didn’t happen ”
    Dying after six months in a concentration camp because of undernourishment, caused by the autonomous camp self management, that ate three times as much as the non members, slaughter ?
    In case you reject what is described by camp inmates, read what Poliakov describes about the Warsaw ghetto, exactly the same.
    Léon Poliakov, ‘Bréviaire de la Haine, Le IIIe Reich et les Juifs’, 1951, 1974, Paris

  44. Jews are syphilis to a society, they first attack through the sex organs ie promiscuity, prostitution – promotion of perversion and degeneracy. They then attack the organs – entering the courts, the schools – Finally in end stage syphilitic infection their infection enters the brain destroying the society’s perception of itself afflicting its cognitive ability and rendering it an invalid carted off to a hospice

    • Replies: @Kolo
  45. @dearieme

    English Left vs. US Left

    Pakistani Brits will naturally veer towards the Left for the generous welfare (Comparatively) and minority perks, same as US blacks and Hispanics. But of course they are Pakistanis so they hate Jews.

    American never had substantial Muslim immigration. So the Jewish have always been Left.

    • Replies: @Moi
  46. mcohen says:
    @Wally

    gimme a wally

    Hohohohohoho at codoh

    • Replies: @Prester John
    , @Wally
  47. Kingfelix says:

    The feedback loop described, whereby a new generation of zealots build upon the work of the previous generation is apposite. I would add to this the fact that, in my personal experience (interacting with Jewish professors at a university bookstore), Jews appear to discount the opinions/guidance/facts furnished of non-Jews to the point where one would often feel invisible and mute, as one’s answers to queries were discounted, while the same response from another Jew would be heard clearly and acknowledged. This, and variations upon it, was a more or less regular occurrence.

    • Replies: @Sic Semper
    , @JackOH
  48. lavoisier says: • Website

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    • Agree: Dan Hayes
  49. Lot says:

    “cries of “anti-Semite” soon appeared, and according to Google there are now over 180,000 such hits combining her name and that harsh accusatory term. ”

    There are also 186,000 Google results combining her name with the word “ducks.”

    What does that prove?

    • Replies: @David
    , @Johnny Rico
    , @Ace
  50. Benedetti says:

    A ‘conservative’ website recently ran a series of articles on antisemitism. Contrary to the usual practice at this site comments were not allowed for these daily antisemitism pieces by various authors.
    One of these pieces was deploring antisemitic conspiracy theories at the beginning. Near the end of the piece the author wrote that Jews have to get more control of the media and educational system to fight antisemitism. Kind of ironic.

    • LOL: Mike P
  51. @Intelligent Dasein

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    That’s a great insight.

    • Replies: @utu
  52. Cleburne says:
    @Patricus

    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can’t find any.

    At the risk of speaking for Mr Unz, I believe his point was you have to look at the Toaff book, as I did. The book (rather pdf, which I obtained via the usual samizdat channels) is incredibly dry/scholarly/detailed/non-hysterial, examines cases in medieval Germany and Italy and makes the careful case that the “blood libel” is likely not a “libel” at all.

    And no, I don’t think you’d find an account of Toaff’s book, much less a summary of the cases he mentions, on the internet or elsewhere.

  53. Cleburne says:
    @Sally Snyder

    White evangelical Christians’ support for the Jewish possession of Israel is higher than for any other religious group other than modern orthodox Jews and is nearly twice the level of religious Jewish support for the concept of a God-given promise of a Jewish homeland.

    Dispensationalism (for which we can thank Mr Scofield’s footnotes for the most part) is without a doubt the most successful heresy Christendom has ever produced.

  54. fnn says:

    Now consider the notion of “anti-Semitism.” Google searches for that word and its close variants reveal over 24 million hits, and over the years I’m sure I’ve seen that term tens of thousands of times in my books and newspapers, and heard it endlessly reported in my electronic media and entertainment. But thinking it over, I’m not sure that I can ever recall a single real-life instance I’ve personally encountered, nor have I heard of almost any such cases from my friends or acquaintances. Indeed, the only persons I’ve ever come across making such claims were individuals who bore unmistakable signs of serious psychological imbalance. When the daily newspapers are brimming with lurid tales of hideous demons walking among us and attacking people on every street corner, but you yourself have never actually seen one, you may gradually grow suspicious.

    Moldbug:

    https://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2013/09/technology-communism-and-brown-scare.html

    It’s actually not hard to explain the Brown Scare. Like all witch hunts, it’s built on a conspiracy theory. The Red Scare was based on a conspiracy theory too, but at least it was a real conspiracy with real witches – two of whom were my father’s parents. (The nicest people on earth, as people. I like to think of them not as worshipping Stalin, but worshipping what they thought Stalin was.) Moreover, the Red Scare was a largely demotic or peasant phenomenon to which America’s governing intellectual classes were, for obvious reasons, immune. Because power works and culture is downstream from politics – real politics, at least – the Red Scare soon faded into a joke.

    As a mainstream conspiracy theory, fully in the institutional saddle, the Brown Scare is far greater and more terrifying. Unfortunately no central statistics are kept, but I wouldn’t be surprised if every day in America, more racists, fascists and sexists are detected, purged and destroyed, than all the screenwriters who had to prosper under pseudonyms in the ’50s. Indeed it’s not an exaggeration to say that hundreds of thousands of Americans, perhaps even a million, are employed in one arm or another of this ideological apparatus. Cleaning it up will require a genuine cultural revolution – or a cultural reaction, anyway. Hey, Americans, I’m ready whenever you are.

    The logic of the witch hunter is simple. It has hardly changed since Matthew Hopkins’ day. The first requirement is to invert the reality of power. Power at its most basic level is the power to harm or destroy other human beings. The obvious reality is that witch hunters gang up and destroy witches. Whereas witches are never, ever seen to gang up and destroy witch hunters. By this test alone, we can see that the conspiracy is imaginary (Brown Scare) rather than real (Red Scare).

    Think about it. Obviously, if the witches had any power whatsoever, they wouldn’t waste their time gallivanting around on broomsticks, fellating Satan and cursing cows with sour milk. They’re getting burned right and left, for Christ’s sake! Priorities! No, they’d turn the tables and lay some serious voodoo on the witch-hunters. In a country where anyone who speaks out against the witches is soon found dangling by his heels from an oak at midnight with his head shrunk to the size of a baseball, we won’t see a lot of witch-hunting and we know there’s a serious witch problem. In a country where witch-hunting is a stable and lucrative career, and also an amateur pastime enjoyed by millions of hobbyists on the weekend, we know there are no real witches worth a damn.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
    , @Skeptikal
  55. nickels says:

    “Anti-semitism” is merely the enforcement wing of Jewish hegemony against moral argument. Anywhere jew power uses injustice, pointing that out becomes anti-semitic.
    The jew, unlike the dullard goyim, undetstands the power of the moral force, despite the fact they work fully against it’s dictates.

  56. Anonymous[329] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Patricus

    http://cwporter.com/toaff.htm

    Discusses some of the reviews of and links to Toaff’s book Blood Passover as well as other thoughts. Poster (Porter?) is undecided.

    Either way, although the subject is fascinating, its veracity is hardly a key component of the greater discussions Mr. Unz recent articles have ignited.

    • Replies: @Patricus
  57. @Kingfelix

    What you say is absolutely true! In the Fall of 1995 I was a senior in Brooklyn College and taking a seminar in American politics, the day Yitzak Rabin was sent to Jesus. The professor was of course a tribe member – Kahan was his surname. A large percentage of the class of course was tribe as well – but not all, approximately 60% were not kosher.
    This professor dedicates the entire class into a weeping session for a dead israeli – having nothing to do with the class – when one jew said to the professor that you know “some” of the students were not jewish and perhaps the lecture should be on the study material – he said “no”… and continued to hold the unclean meat students hostage to his mourning.

    As always once they make up percentages larger than their societal representations they take control over every dynamic and hold the host population in contemptuous disdain and silence.

    Incidentally, this same professor was quoted in Time Magazine in 1994 as saying American students would have no job prospects in the United States and should look overseas – that he was most certainly correct on.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Sic Semper
  58. On our local cable outlet there is a network that is devoted solely to matters of concern to Jewish people. Fine. Except for one thing: the obsession with the Holocaust. It is not healthy, either on the individual level or on the collective level, to obsess over dark events in life. Unless of course some benefit is derived. And in the case of the Holocaust there seems to be no end to this obsession. Which suggests that Finkelstein, known to be Alan Dershowitz’ “bete noir”, may be right after all–there really IS a “Holocaust industry”!

  59. @mcohen

    I assume this is garden variety black subkultcha.

    Talk about reinforcing stereotypes!

  60. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The pompous Bardon Kaldian babbling about something again. When he isn’t bragging about his supposed high IQ he is calling out people as antisemites and thinking up strange convoluted reasons why the Jews are never wrong and are always victims.

    This whole classical Jew vs assimilated Jew argument is laughable. In other words the kind of Jew that is causing all the problems are a tiny, tiny segment of all Jews. And once they are assimilated, it is nothing but apple pie and baseball. Might as well import all the Jews world wide so we can assimilate them lol. Well the problem with that is we know that even assimilated Jews, like presumably you, more often than not have similar character flaws. So it is a moot point.

    You can also say that the problems with black people are not from black people per se but an issue of classical blacks vs assimilated blacks. Or there is no Muslim problem, there are classical muslims vs assimilated muslims. But you would laugh at those examples no?

  61. nagra says:

    (if I may)

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Druid
  62. @lavoisier

    A price has to be paid for honesty though i.e. Mr. Unz won’t be getting any invites from the NYT to do an op-ed piece anytime soon. On the other hand, that’s a badge of honor and worth the price.

  63. Gordo says:
    @lavoisier

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    Very much so.

  64. Anonymous[329] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Patricus

    http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/jewish_sacrifice.htm

    This page cites 40 or more historical jewish ritual murders (usually of Christians) including those of children. Many sources are cited all the way to antiquity. Search the page for “Herodotus”. The list begins there.

    • Replies: @Heros
  65. @Sic Semper

    He was right about the job market. But few young people have the initiative to move overseas or adapt. They’d rather remain in the city in post-industrial decline waiting for the economy to “come back”.

    Which it never did.

    I’d have never done anything in my field if I had remained in Detroit.

  66. @Sic Semper

    Another example of being held ideologically hostage occurred in 1994 in a class lectured by Iranian Hostage crisis survivor Barry Rosen, the image of him being blindfolded and held hostage was the graphic accompanying every newscast for the year and a half the crisis continued.

    Rosen taught an Iran module and was very fair in his depiction of the country and even-handed regarding his treatment as a hostage. Near the end of the semester he brought an Iranian diplomat in to speak to the class – It was truly fascinating.

    I vividly remember one jew in the class wearing his yarmaluke and kippah who obnoxiously slept the entire class and made grunting noises and loudly sighed the entire time. He quickly awoke during the opportunity to ask questions – of which he raised his hand and DEMANDED to know why Iran was HOSTILE to israel. Now, this person gave zero respect to the speaker and the lecture was not on Iranian foreign policy, all of it pertained to the nation’s history avoiding anything remotely divisive or combative – israel was not mentioned once by the guest speaker – the speaker politely explained that israel was also hostile to Iran and shied away from any further discussion of geopolitics. With that the disrespectful student who had accomplished his grandstanding got up and stormed violently out of the classroom.

    I remember the feelings of disgust I had at witnessing the matter. The diplomat was not politically posturing, put no one on notice and was not hostile even to the person who attacked him. It was a disgusting attempt at holding hostage a classroom lecture on history with the witnesses to it.

    Just once I would love to see a similar act on a “holocaust survivor” –

    Hijacking discussions at every opportunity is another hallmark.

    • Agree: RobinG
    • Replies: @Heros
    , @A guy in Germany
  67. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @dearieme

    I am unimpressed with your whole antisemite trope. Jews or useful gentiles which you seem to be, see antisemitism everywhere. You could just as easily say that UK leftists hate the Chinese because of trade issues or that they are racist against Russians because of hysteria in the UK press.

    How bout you not treat Jews as if they are a special class of people to be coddled like retarded children. In any group, there will be people who do not like others. That does not make a movement antisemitic.

    As far as the holocaust, I have to admit that seeing contemporary Jews like so much in the media has me feeling skeptical about what happened in WW2. But I also have no motivation to believe what happened then until Jews acknowledge the modern day holocaust happening in Palestine which has caused at least as many deaths.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Anon
  68. What Ron Unz says makes a lot of sense. I personally know a few Jewish people, In-laws and others and I find them to be some of the nicest people. But the “International Jew” is a whole other matter.
    I wonder what these Jewish people would really think about important matters as all I remember in my discussions with them has been about sports , weather, vacations and such. Broaching incorrect topics maybe would have been the end of friendships and perhaps incurred shunning. Can you imagine if I had brought up the topic of hereditary IQ. To be fair a lot of non Jewish people have the same ideas of “we are created equal”.
    Ron you are a very brave man. We need more people like you.

  69. @Sic Semper

    That’s horrible, but probably not much different than the Catholic Church closing ranks to protect pedophile priests.

  70. @nagra

    (They) want more of (Them) to return to (their homeland) so the plot conceived by (Them) to import Muslims who hate (Them) is a secret (Z-conspiracy) plot.

    Sorry, its the Freemasons. They’re Jews too.

    • Replies: @nagra
  71. @Verymuchalive

    So about this issue: One time Minister of the Interior Vyacheslav von Plehve estimated that 40% of Russia’s revolutionaries were Jews.

    From a 1903 speech:

    In Western Russia some 90% of the revolutionaries are Jews, and in Russia generally – some 40%. I shall not conceal from you that the revolutionary movement in Russia worries us but you should know that if you do not deter your youth from the revolutionary movement, we shall make your position untenable to such an extent that you will have to leave Russia, to the very last man!

    He was assassinated in 1904. In fairness, his killer seems to have been an ethnic Russian (Egor Sazonov).

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  72. @dearieme

    Leftists, as blank slate opponents of “privilege”, should be more anti-Semitic than right-wingers by default. Anything else is dishonest.

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @Silva
  73. res says:
    @mcohen

    4.did any other people besides jews commit the same crimes.

    That says a great deal. Time to change the narrative from denial to tu quoque?

  74. @Wally

    a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews

    Replace the word ‘jews’ with ‘cells’ and you have aptly described cancer

  75. joe webb says:

    Strange that Kevin MacDonald’s magisterial three volumes on Jewish history and especially his third volume, Culture of Critique, is not remarked in Ron’s otherwise very good article.

    Also, the Neoconservataives, who are starting world war 3 and attacking Russia, misleading American pols big-time on Russia and the middle east, while China looms larger and larger, is also a notably overlooked theme.

    Maybe there will be a Part Two from Ron.

    Joe Webb

  76. @Anonymous

    Russia is assassinating people on UK soil with nerve gas. There is a fair degree of reason for the UK to be wary of them.

  77. res says:

    After reading this article I understand the extended recent outage at unz.com. You are a brave man, Ron. Mazel tov.

  78. A very good example of “Anti-semitism” is Lindbergh’s “notorious” speech in Des Moines in September 1941, which is inevitably trotted out whenever anyone (Pat Buchanan, Trump) starts talking of any independent (“isolationist”) foreign policy. Lindbergh, heretofore, an American icon, was forever after tarnished goods.

    It is interesting to read the text of his speech today, and compare it to the reaction it elicited (and still elicits).

    Here is a link to the speech:

    http://www.charleslindbergh.com/americanfirst/speech.asp

    and here is a summary of the manner in which it was received by the nation’s press (courtesy of the JTA, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency):

    https://www.jta.org/1941/09/15/archive/lindberghs-anti-jewish-speech-meets-with-severe-criticism-in-american-press

    Finally, here is a compilation of the “anti-Semitic” parts of the speech:

    The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration . . .

    The second major group I mentioned is the Jewish.

    It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race.

    No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its consequences.

    Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far-sighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not.

    Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.

    I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.

    We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.

    It is highly recommended to read the whole speech, as it offers an equally astute analysis of the other two principal actors of US intervention in the war.

    • Replies: @LSJohn
  79. Heros says:

    Thank you Ron Unz, not only for lifting this series of rocks and boulders covering up massive and even biblical jewish lies, frauds, and conspiracies, but also for providing me personally with a platform where I can vent my digust with this jewish collective to other like minded people without being banned or even excessively trolled. I thank you as a Christian for helping us to get off of our mind controlled knees to face these centuries old sects of ritual child murderers and genociders. I thank you for being a shining beacon of honesty and good character for jews to look up to (as if any will). The good lord knows that jews suffer from a massive dearth of people of character like you so I ask him to protect you.

    “If our mainstream media shapes our reality, scholarly books and articles based upon them tend to set the contours of that media coverage. And the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them.”

    We have to recognize that these same “energetic Jews” are pulling all kinds of strings, not just media. They are making every institution across the entire west dance to their tune of Anti-semitism, holohoax, pornography and cultural degradation, and mass population replacement.

    But most important is their control of the CIA and so called “deep state”. The CIA is deeply involved in media across the west, as is Mossad. We now know that Walter Cronkite, who got famous propagating the moon landing fraud, was a CIA asset. We know that today, Anderson Cooper, descendant of the bloodline Vanderbilt family, is a CIA asset.

    “Sometimes the intelligence agencies come to your office, they want you to write an article”

    Shortly after his book “Bought Journalists” was published in English, Udo suddenly died of an unexpected heart attack. Hmmmm. Maybe this is relevant:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6001335/How-Israels-secret-service-world-leader-assassins.html

    “Poison toothpaste, prisoners hypnotised to kill: How Mossad, Israel’s secret service, has become the world leader in assassins with 800 operations in the last decade

    Jews assasinate, or use a dagger to stab in the back, on an average of 80 goyim a year. I would bet that they took Udo out, along with Breitbard, Aaron Schwarz, and many, many others.

    I think we have to recognized that jews, historical assasins and ritual murderers for thousands of years, are still marching around the planet murdering goyim and jews who squeal. Like Seth Rich.

    So my questions to jews is: We know jews murder without compunction any inconvenient goyim to this day, so on what basis can you expect stupid goyim to believe that you have stopped torturing, extracting blood and organs from, and murdering Christian infants?

    Back to Unz saying to the jews that the lies and deceptions spewing out of the vast jewish media industrial complex has had “enormous consequences for our larger society” (milquetoast). Here is what the jewish master of propaganda and mind control, and inbred double nephew of Sigmund Freud, had to say:

    “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”

    Through their control of the narrative and the media, the jews have been the “rue ruling power of our country” for over a hundred years. Every international action the US has taken since then has been made for the express purpose of helping Jews.

    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Replies: @anonymous
  80. Many thanks for this, Ron Unz. One of the hardest things in the world is trying to focus on what is true when you know that those on one side of the argument are ready to clobber you if you veer onto the other side.

  81. iffen says:
    @Anatoly Karlin

    Most leftists:

    Each successful Jew has attained his position because of that particular individual’s agency.

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.

    Do blacks, women, browns, etc. have agency?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Wally
    , @anon
  82. nagra says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    I would rather call a spare pope as a witness in global
    never heard about bosnian nation or language as well
    \same happens on the land of so called palestine now\

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Druid
  83. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    No they are not. Russians aren’t stupid and there are so many holes in this conspiracy theory it is laughable. The UK set up this assignation on their own to frame Russia duh.

  84. nagra says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Russia can do you all in one go if they are really after that
    no single Scripal died apropos your call of “assassination”

  85. JackOH says:
    @Kingfelix

    Kingfelix, yep. “Are you Jewish?”, a Jewish businessman asked me. I guess I presented as intellectually aggressive and verbal. Nope, I replied. He stayed friendly, but it’s a sure bet I missed something of an opportunity that would have been open had I offered the “right” answer.

    I may have mentioned here when I first noted my “are you Jewish?” story that I’ve grossly overestimated talent alone as a determinant of hiring, interviews, advancement, and what-not, and grossly underestimated familial and ethnic ties, the whole mess of other human bonds and attributes, plus affirmative action as “helper” or “clincher” determinants.

  86. @nagra

    Since you cannot read or write in English, I am unable to understand the point of your post.

    • Replies: @nagra
  87. One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it.

    This contrasts vividly with the immediate accusations of ‘anti-semitism’ one provokes if one criticizes Israel. I’ve been labeled an ‘anti-semite’ myself for attacking Israel. The prominent professor Deborah Lipstadt has called Jeremy Corbyn’s views ‘soft-core anti-semitism’ — simply because he refuses to actually endorse Israeli criminality. Jimmy Carter has been called an ‘anti–semite’ for daring to point out some of Israel’s more outrageous practices. The brilliant and otherwise impeccably progressive Norm Finkelstein was not merely denied tenure for his views; there were actual efforts to get him evicted from his apartment. These figures are all supposedly ‘anti-semites’ — and as such, to be persecuted, hounded, and if possible, forced to recant.

    This strikes me as ridiculous: would one be labeled as an anti-German bigot if one objected to Nazism? Would a ferocious anti-Communism be considered proof that one hated Russians?

    The point, though, is that those who wield the club of labelling all and sundry ‘anti-semites’ don’t seem to care about anti-semitism at all, per se. As many here manage to unconsciously demonstrate, you can voice the most unmeasured anti-semitism without fear of condemnation.

    On the other hand, as I’ve enumerated, there are examples of people being criticised, persecuted, hounded from their jobs for attacking Israel. However, the unfortunate Professor Toaff is the only example I can think of of anyone being seriously attacked for expressing anti-semitic views as such. Generally, if you’re feeling froggy, jump. No one cares.

    What can — and will — provoke a response is criticism of Israel. The condemnation of anti-semitism isn’t about anti-semitism at all. Much more commonly, it’s a useful club to prevent criticism of Israel.

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @jsm
  88. this is in no way meant to be inflammatory, derogatory or conspiratorial; however, does the author have any opinion regarding the authenticity of the protocols.

    i have read them, and the scheme depicted therein is a cogent, thoughtful, and disciplined plan which appears to be coming to some form of fruition, and is in no way as nebulous, and ill-defined as the much more academically accepted oracles of nostradamus.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  89. @Jeff Stryker

    Some “nerve gas” that seemingly is only fatal in just 25% of cases and takes several days to kill. Military grade you say?

    • Replies: @nagra
    , @anon
  90. It could have been Russian mafia. But the again, Trotsky was killed with an ax.

  91. bjondo says:
    @Patricus

    Every day, in Israel, Muslim and Christian children.

  92. nagra says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    oh really

    како би било да ти мало научиш српски па да онда мало паметујеш па тек онда да цијели свијет може мало боље разумјети па да дохвати такву примитивну патетичност
    није ти мало тих твојих гена које смо ти дали

    како би било да ти почнем причу од неке тамо Винче

    https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin%C4%8Danska_kultura

    what you are not able to read now is 7ooo year old language

    ме
    In Roots

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  93. nagra says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    no person was even killed in Scripal case
    @Jeff Stryker is just pathetic with tear in his eye

  94. David says:
    @Lot

    Good rhetoric but upon searching the two strings, in the case of anti-semite, the word or a closely related one actually appears in the hits, whereas with ducks, no hit (out of the first 8 or 10) actually contains the word duck, unless in a link to another, unrelated article.

  95. RudyM says:

    6,000,000 comments by the end of the week.

    • Replies: @nagra
  96. nagra says:
    @RudyM

    let’s not forget 25 mill russians
    and the 1.7 mill serbs
    as well

  97. utu says:
    @TomSchmidt

    That’s not an insight. And insight requires something to exist. This is a construction by our wannabe Freud, you idiot, who, btw, also is an idiot.

    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
  98. This is in the category of “Jeez, I wish I’d have said that!” Terrific article, Ron Unz.

  99. @Anonymous

    Rather Funny but I was reading about the Trump vrs NYTimes controversy. I began to wonder about not just jews individually but jewish conrol (USA) institutions in major pro Zionist historical events….what has been the role of the NYTimes during the USA Civil War, the creation of the Fed, WW I, WW II, the Vietnam, Watergate, JFK,RKennedy, 911, dimise, etc. has any scholar investigated the UNknown history of the NYTimes …???? IBM heped the NAZIs…NYTImes role in Hstorical events collaboration with Nazism, pro Israel terrorists…what??

  100. @nagra

    HEY TITO

    I knew you were a dumb Slav to think a German American could read that.

  101. Heros says:
    @Colin Wright

    “One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it.”

    Get a grip on in Colin! Week after week, Ron Unz has been chronicling jewish perfidity and coverups of centuries of crimes against humanity. At least on unz.com, if you don’t agree with Ron’s analysis you had a loads of chances to debate it there. Instead, like all the other arrogant jews, you start your entire comment kvetching and flinging spittle with the same old “anti-semite” canard. Give us a break for crying out loud.

    There is no more discussion, except among you jewish racist supremacists who are accessories to the murder of children, of if anti-semitism is a chicken/egg dilemma. Anti-semitism is a reaction to jewish lies and crimes. Here at Unz, with this article, it has been laid to rest.

    When you immediately start your post with this standard centuries old jewish canard, we know that you are just being duplicitous.

    However, now that we do know that the roots of anti-semitism are a reaction to jewish crimes, jewish lies, and jewish ritual sacrifices, it is time to turn our attention back to 1933. That is the year that the “anti-semite” Hitler got elected. To quote Benjamin Freedman:

    “Before Hitler had touched the hair of a single jew, Judea declared war on Germany”

    .
    Jews deliberately started WWII using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call “anti-semitism”.

    If we go further back to WWI, with the prolonging of the war until Balfour was signed and the Jews brought America into the war, it is clear that jews started this war too, using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call “anti-semitism”.

    So if we look back over the last 100 years, or even all the way back to the French revolution, what we see is hundreds of pointless wars between Christian countries, that were started using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call “anti-semitism”.

    When I look at the score card here, I see in the White European column tens upon tens upon tens of millions of dead fighting wars for lying jews. In the jew column I see 6 million, listed about 33 times starting about 1880. All of them fake. All of them projected back onto the goyim.

    What a race of swine.

    • Agree: Druid
  102. AaronB says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    You are one of the most original thinkers here – I don’t necessarily agree with everything you say, but you say interesting and original things that are out of the box.

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.

    So you won’t get much appreciation here – but write for the invisible audience, its worthwhile.

  103. nagra says:
    @Anonymous

    If you really want your mind blown, read Marquis de Sade
    ( just saying : )

  104. @Intelligent Dasein

    How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point

    Now if only we could manage to awaken the gentile masses to the reality that the Jews weaving these fanciful fables of victimization and hardship to manipulate and ultimately harm us are in fact the terrifying and challenging enemy that we have been wanting for.

    Then we could genuinely put that desire for heroism to good work.

  105. Wally says:
    @mcohen

    Yep, another True Believer, mcohen, bites the dust. That’s his best shot.
    recommended:
    The Counter Terminology to Holocaust Denial Should Be Holocaust Belief, by Carolyn Yeager: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11899
    exc.:
    “Just as with any religion, obedience to it’s dogma makes one a Believer, a faithful True Believer.
    Since there are no verifiable, actual, provable facts or physical evidence to hold onto, the Believer clings to faith & faith alone.

    Just look at the intentionally misleading make-believe theatrical lighting & staging, embarrassing actually”:
    http://www.codoh.com

  106. How DARE you notice (fill in the Israeli/Jewish outrage here or over there), you anti-Semite! That’s pretty much the deal. That ain’t no poor little country on the heels of three wars that I knew 45 years ago. Read up on AIPAC and ADL, to say nothing of another 5 or 6 hundred other distributors of billions in cash to our politicians. Then compare the “Russians’ effect.Israeli’s own the joint. Pardon us amti-Semites for noticing. It gets that way when Jews call through their proxies for the elimination of us anti-Semitic Whites, the Jews themselves being Whiter than the the Whi.
    tes they hate.

  107. sarz says:

    And no, I don’t think you’d find an account of Toaff’s book, much less a summary of the cases he mentions, on the internet or elsewhere.

    I think Israel Shamir’s review of Toaff might be what you say you are unable to find.

    http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Eng11.htm

    • Agree: Cleburne
  108. Heros says:
    @Anonymous

    Wow Wow Wow! Incredible.

    Aside from all the documented ritual blood sacrifices throughout history, what is a revelation is that it proves that this is still going on today on a massive scale:

    “Abortion has become an overt means of child sacrifice which Jews have instituted under their defacto law. A more covert means of {Christian} child sacrifice has been by their infamous ‘ritual murders, which Jews have been accused through the ages.’ In this practice ‘the blood of the sacrificed gentile {Christian Child} is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.’”

    We know that Kevin Okeefe exposed Planned Parenthood for selling parts of aborted fetuses. I wonder if the jew PP organization might have got the idea to extract 100% of the blood from these fetuses and sell it on for us in Purim rituals? Naa, jews have morals. Thats what all the jews on unz keep telling us anyway.

    Then they also say this:

    “Typical was the case of Jan Masaryk, the President of Czechoslovakia.

    Masaryk was an obscure lawyer when the body of Agnez Hruza was found in Bohemia in 1899.
    A Jew named Hilsner confessed to the murder and implicated two other Jews.
    Nevertheless, a new trial was ordered. Dr. Baxa, attorney for the murdered girl’s mother, who was seeking justice in this case, made a speech in the Bohemian Diet, or Parliament, December 28, 1899, accusing the Government of having shown extreme partiality to the Jews in this case. A second body was found, that of Maria Klima, who had also been murdered with a ritual knife which was found in Hilsner’s possession.

    Hilsner’s defending counsel at this trial was Jan Masaryk. At the Versailles Peace Conference, twenty years later, the Jews showed their gratitude by making a new nation, Czechoslovakia, and appointing Masaryk President, with the title, founder of Czechoslovakia. Throughout his life, Masaryk was an eager and willing tool of Jewish leaders.

    Suddenly we understand why the jews in Czechoslovakia were tormenting, murdering and likely even bloodletting the Sudeten Germans. This is how the jews started WWII, by killing and murdering Christians and then projecting their crime back on some other innocent but stupid goyim. But also it was all based on the cover up of a jewish ritual blood sacrifice. Amazing, the coverup is always worse.

    There is sooo much more in the document:

    “Because the city of Chicago is a center of Jewish financial power, and is completely controlled by the Jews, some of the most flagrant cases of ritual murder of Christian children have occurred there in recent years. Chicago is said to have become one of the world centers of the supply of children’s blood used in Jewish rites. The Chief of Police admitted that three hundred children disappear each month in Chicago, but he claims that they are all “runaways.” it is odd that these runaways never turn up, either in Chicago or anywhere else. In October, 1955, the rash of ritual murder cases was at a height when the bodies of two Schuessler boys, a Peterson boy, and the two Grimes girls were discovered.”

  109. Abbybwood says:
    @Grahamsno(G64)

    Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!

    I was listening to an update by Alan Zabrosky last night where he laments that it is game over for the United States related to Jewish control over The White House, Congress and more and more state legislatures.

    Already about 20 or more states have made it illegal to support the BDS movement. Soon any negative discussions or questioning of “the official story”regarding The Holocaust will be illegal, so get at it Ron while you still can!

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @James Forrestal
    , @Wade
  110. @utu

    It was Jung who was the big theoretician of the Shadow.

    I recall an argument with a colleague about the Bishop Ussher, who calculated the precise date of creation October, 4004BC. He said well, the answer’s wrong, so the work is useless. I pointed out that, given the assumptions that the Bible is real, that it was a major work of scholarship. What we judged was the ability to logically apply scholarship within a paradigm. This did not require us to accept the premises of Biblical literal correctness.

    Within a Jungian paradigm, that’s an insight, defined as
    “the capacity to gain an accurate and deep intuitive understanding of a person or thing”. To quote from Wikipedia on Shadow:

    Contrary to a Freudian definition of shadow, the Jungian shadow can include everything outside the light of consciousness and may be positive or negative. “Everyone carries a shadow,” Jung wrote, “and the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is.”[2] It may be (in part) one’s link to more primitive animal instincts,[3] which are superseded during early childhood by the conscious mind.

    Carl Jung stated the shadow to be the unknown dark side of the personality.[4][5] According to Jung, the shadow, in being instinctive and irrational, is prone to psychological projection, in which a perceived personal inferiority is recognized as a perceived moral deficiency in someone else. Jung writes that if these projections remain hidden, “The projection-making factor (the Shadow archetype) then has a free hand and can realize its object—if it has one—or bring about some other situation characteristic of its power.”[6] These projections insulate and harm individuals by acting as a constantly thickening veil of illusion between the ego and the real world.

  111. Wally says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Good points.

    The demonization of the great Richard Wagner is a great example.

    Euro-gentiles cannot be allowed to have their heroes, tales of courage & strength unless Jews create them, control the message within them.

    Jews:
    the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral

    The debunked game is now out in the open, change is occurring.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  112. renfro says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Who made this statement when ?

    Ron made it in this article.

    • Replies: @Herald
  113. phil says:
    @Roy Bauer

    The article at holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com says:

    ‘It is highly significant that among this enormous collection of secret German records, not a single one provides any evidence of mass killing, or even refers to a German wartime policy or program of “extermination.” To the contrary, many of these documents — such as those cited in this article — further demonstrate the seriousness of the efforts by high-level government and SS authorities to maintain the health of inmates by combating disease in the camps.’

    However, David Irving has been touting correspondence between Heinrich Himmler (head of the SS) and a German statistician that indicates that the number of Jews executed in the Reinhardt Camps of Eastern Poland was in the millions, not even counting the many thousands of Jews who were allegedly shot by mobile units that operated in Eastern Europe after the launch of Operation Barbarossa in 1941. He also refers to documents in which Himmler indicates a desire to conceal information about mass deaths from Hitler.

    Will the debate end up being between Irving, who lost a famous court case as a “denier,” vs real denialists?

    See Irving’s Youtube “The Life and Death of Heinrich Himmler.” See also the document “Himmler Decodes” (British intercepts of Himmler’s correspondence) at Irving’s website.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wally
    , @Mulegino1
  114. @Heros

    Well, I suppose jews had read Mein Kampf, where jews are called schmarotzer, parasites.
    Now for me the basic moral question of WII is simple: was Hitler right in drastically reducing jewish influence in Germany, or were jews right in trying to remove Hitler ?

    Such conflicts are not seldom in history.
    Michel Rostovtzeff, ‘Geschichte der Alten Welt, erster Band, Der Orient und Griechenland’, Bremen 1961 (The History of the Ancient World), page 445: Antiochos IV tried by force to impose Greek culture in Judea. Jews responded with a vehement national reaction, that led them into almost complete segregation in religion and customs.

    I’d like to add that I wonder how much longer common USA citizens accept the present jewish influence in the USA.
    If people as Wolfowitz, Soros and Netanyahu had any common sense, they would ask themselves if for jewry the moment for a complete change of jewish behaviour is not necessary now.
    I here quoted Katz ‘can it happen again ?’.
    I suppose it can, though I see gas chambers for humans as a fairy tale.
    After Pearl Harbour the USA was quite capable of interning anyone Japanese or of japanese descent in concentration camps.

    Stephen Steinlight wrote that in case of disaster there would always be Israel to go to.
    He did not realise that, in my opinion, Israel is wholly dependent on USA support.
    The Samsom option will not save jewish lives, on the contrary.

    • Replies: @Heros
  115. Wally says:
    @Abbybwood

    said:
    “Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!”

    Indeed, I too would like Ron Unz to open up a bit more about that impossible, easily exposed fraud. However, by simply allowing the subject to be discussed at his site is pretty damn admirable.

    It’s already well covered here:

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos: http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1
    Visit & search here: http://www.codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau

  116. nagra says:

    (just in case someone doesn’t understand my posts)

  117. Heros says:
    @Sic Semper

    “Hijacking discussions”

    The problem is that if you scale up “discussions” you come to “narratives”, and yes they have been hijacked. This jewish hijacking of the narrative, like many of the things they have imposed on us, has been done patiently and salami style: slice by slice.

    Jews always like to run to the boss, or the person of most authority. Where you or I would go through channels, escalating things properly so that the system can work smoothly, the jew looks for some vulnerable higher level goyim or another heeb in authority, and immediately jumps the queue.

    Do you think that judea is being ruled by a Frankist/Sabattean cult?

  118. Dan says:
    @Caruthers

    It should be stricken from the lexicon because it simply makes no sense. The word “Semite” refers to:

    “a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs” or “a descendant of these peoples.”

    So how did “anti-Semitism” come to refer only to anti-Jewish sentiment?

    Further, the only group mentioned above that most would equate with modern Jews is the Hebrews, and their relation is rather dubious.

    A “bottom line” would be that most people who identify as Jewish are not Semitic while most Arabs are. Simplistic, but largely true.

    Note too, that while the definition I gave above is from Merriam Webster, if you “Google” it the first result Google returns is this:

    “a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic language, including in particular the Jews and Arabs.”

    • Replies: @nagra
  119. Heros says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “jews are called schmarotzer, parasites.”

    I’ll have to remember that one. If anyone ever calls me a schmarotzer I’ll declare war on him and hire a bunch of sadistc jewish communists to ritually murder his family. That’ll teach him not to call me a parasite.

    As I linked above, Mossad has assassinated 800 people in the last 10 years, it still hasn’t stopped, the jewish war of blood lust against goyim. This has been going on for centuries, anti-semitism is really nothing more than jewish projection and gaslighting of the goyim. Please read this article for more information. Nothing Hitler did was wrong, just ask Bibi:

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578

    ““Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked public uproar when on Tuesday he claimed that the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, was the one who planted the idea of the extermination of European Jewry in Adolf Hitler’s mind. The Nazi ruler, Netanyahu said, had no intention of killing the Jews, but only to expel them.

    Of coures, Bibi is also gaslighting the goyim here, we know that he will make up other lies about Hitler as soon as it is convenient or necessary. The point is that the jews used their Polish and Czech puppets to attack Germany after the jews had publicly declared war in 1933. Now we know that the President of Czechoslovakia was tied to the jews through the blood sacrifice of Christian children, and Pole Buffoon was also dancing on their string, as were the 3 stooges Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin.

    Judea started the second world war, there is no longer any question.

  120. nagra says:
    @Dan

    So what is Palestinian language?

  121. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:

    In my naive younger years, I used to admire the Jews a great deal, mostly for their enormous success in finance, entertainment and educational attainment. To me they were a people who succeed despite 2,000 years of persecution, and are simply the smartest people around. They seemed to dominate every field despite being such a small percentage of the world’s population, a mere 15 million out of 7 billion.

    But these days I’m increasingly suspicious of Jewish success. Are they really successful because they are smarter and better than everyone else, or did they simply succeed through a combination of ethnic nepotism, ruthlessness and extreme dishonesty? Dishonest people always make honest people look like fools. They were smart in that they first took over the pantheon of academia, Harvard, and from there, all of our colleges esp. the humanities. From there they educated all future generations of teachers, journalists and took over msm. The rest is history. Once a Jew breaks into an industry, he’ll only hire and promote other jews until they dominate, even those with mediocre talent.

    This ethnic nepotism is the main reason why Hollywood, modern lit and modern art, all dominated by Jews, have produced increasingly degenerative garbage(while being propped up as brilliant masterpieces by Jewish “experts”), while the Scientific Research field has become so dog-eat-dog and dishonest, with researchers stealing each other’s works and ideas. Hollywood, Wall Street, K Street, Academia, Silicon Valley, the Media, judiciary bench, the Deep State — practically all fields dominated by Jews, have descended into cesspools of depravity. It’s as if they can’t help themselves, no matter what field they get into, Jews seek to dominate, then run it to the ground through greed, lust and total lack of self-restraint.

    Jews have hit the jackpot by seizing control of US Deep State. They now pretty much control the world. As usual with their greed for power and money, they want to hold on to that perch for as long as possible — by promoting open borders and multiculturalism, to dilute white power. The media and academia are their biggest propaganda machines. They viciously hunt down and shame all who challenge their dominance(like what Sasha Baron Cohen is doing with his show).

    Jews will run America to the ground the same way they run Wall Street, Hollywood, SV and every industry they dominate to the ground. To defeat this, we need to start with academia, the same way they started, by taking back control of the pantheon of academia, Harvard. We must either defeat affirmative action, or make Harvard and the Higher Ed cartel irrelevant by promoting online learning, and hiring and promoting those who are self-taught through MOOCs.

    • Agree: renfro
    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  122. phil says:
    @Anon

    David Irving found a document in Weizmann’s archives saying that, not only had Jews gotten the US into WWI; they could also get the US into WWII.

    Astonishing when you really think about it.

    • Replies: @nagra
    , @Anon
  123. nagra says:
    @phil

    US was mostly a watcher in both wars you have mentioned
    both the US and the UK charged even for boot laces in gold

    • Replies: @phil
    , @phil
    , @Ace
  124. AaronB says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    I would also say that there similarities between parts of the Old Testament and Norse Sagas – both are “heroic epics” on the grand scale.

    What is fascinating is how a “heroic epic” can change form so dramatically over the centuries while retaining the essential kernel and manifest in the most unlikely and unpromising forms.

    And you are surely right that if Whites weren’t materialists but had their own “heroic epics” and so themselves as protagonists in a grand sweeping narrative – as to some extent the Left does – they would have nothing fear from Jews.

    But my experiences on this site have taught me that materialism among whites, while on the wane, is far from a spent force, and I was shocked by the tenacity, rage, and fierceness with which the materialists fight for maintaining their position (witness utu, and many commenters over at Karlin)

    So we are far from out of the tunnel yet, and the metaphysical stupidity of Whites today remains astounding.

    • Replies: @iffen
  125. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.

    Don’t say……

    So you won’t get much appreciation here – but write for the invisible audience, its worthwhile.

    Yup.

    • Agree: AaronB
  126. @Anatoly Karlin

    They don’t make Interior Ministers like that anymore, sadly. Could you imagine any contemporary European or North American Interior Minister saying such a thing to Muslims ?

  127. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @phil

    Citation?

    • Replies: @Phil
  128. Wally says:
    @phil

    I assume Irving is referring to the Korherr Report, which is laughable, it says nothing about killing Jews.

    The Korherr Report is explained by Richard Korherr himself:

    The well-known, racially persecuted writer H.G. Adler, previously resident in Prague, now in London, wrote in the foreword to the second edition to his extraordinary book Theresienstadt 1941-1945 in 1960:

    “It has definitely been determined that the designation of Dr. Korherr as SS-statistician…is not true, because he never belonged to the SS and has been rehabilitated insofar as his behaviour in the National Socialist years is concerned.”

    Unfortunately, Der Spiegel is publishing the claim of the English historian Irving that in the spring of 1942, at Himmler’s order, I calculated the number of Jewish victims. In fact, these figures along with the text were delivered to me in completed form by the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA) with the order that not one word or figure was to be changed.

    The statement that I had claimed in this regard that more than a million Jews had died as a result of special treatment in the camps in German-occupied Poland and in the Warthegau is also incorrect. I have to protest against the word “died” in this context.

    It was precisely the term “special treatment” (sonderbehandlung) that motivated me to inquire of the RSHA by telephone what this term meant. I received the answer that it referred to Jews who would be settled in the District of Lublin.

    - Dr. Richard Korherr

    Braunschweig Nr. 28, July 1977, p. 72-74, Der SPIEGEL, an article commenting on the controversy surrounding David Irving’s book “Hitler’s War” under the title : HITLER — Kecke Revision.
    Korherr’s letter appears among a series of reactions (“Hitler gegen Irving”) by people like Robert M. W. Kempner or the historians John Toland and Hans-Heinrich Wilhelm An English translation of the letter was presented during Udo Walendy’s testimony at the Zündel trial 1988.

    Another recommended take down on the Irving claims about the Korherr Report:
    The Razor and the Ring, by John Weir

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3008/?lang=en

    • Replies: @Phil
  129. Taco Town says:
    @renfro

    Three answers:

    1. I came to my current opinion via “where there’s smoke there’s fire” reasoning. Reading alternative commentary on the internet has simply added up.
    2. I don’t distrust Jews specifically so much as I distrust the progressive left. Any opinion of Jews that I have is based on the strong correlation between the Jewish people and the progressive left.
    3. What to do about it? Defeat and suppress the progressive left.

    • Replies: @renfro
  130. LSJohn says:
    @for-the-record

    Thanks.

    Lindbergh really got a bad rap, and still does.

    After Pearl Harbor he tried to re-enlist in the Air Service but was spitefully denied for his earlier opposition to the war. He went to work for Henry Ford as a consultant to the production of B-24s.

    In early ’44 he went to the Pacific and flew 50 combat missions as a civilian “Tech Rep.”

  131. Anon[409] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome

    Would you care to elaborate on that, how the hoax worked, who was responsible and, above all evidence, sources?

    Or should we take it as supporting material for being put in the same ward as Wally?

  132. Moi says:
    @Wally

    Though I don’t know if this is true, I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel’s victory in the ’67 war. After that there was a flood of holocaust books. Can anyone shed some light on this….

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @renfro
    , @anon
  133. @iffen

    Haven’t you left out “empowerment” (individual division)? I’m sure it belongs in their somewhere.

    • Replies: @iffen
  134. Wally says:
    @phil

    As for the claimed mass shootings of Jews, the fraudulent “Holocaust Industry” now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.

    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the ‘holocaust’ propganda is the message.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  135. Anon[267] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    The Skirpals were killed with a poison developed at the British defense department facility at Porton Downs, just a few miles from where they were poisoned.

    • Replies: @nagra
    , @Druid
  136. anon[148] • Disclaimer says:

    My advice is to keep your head, and don’t let this drive you crazy as it has to so many. No matter what your genetic background, be yourself. Take what good your culture may have given you, reject the bad and the superstitious, and live life as best you can with the DNA you’ve got.

    • Replies: @Ace
  137. nagra says:

    it might be Gandhi saying
    if you see two fish in the ocean fighting
    you’ll find some Britishmen (a Kingsman) around

  138. Silva says:
    @Anatoly Karlin

    It’s possible to be Leftist and non-blank-slatist (or to be blank-slatist on race, but consider inherited culture decisive). I (non-Jew) always was, and notice growing numbers of Jews becoming of late: of course, it’s from that position that one can try to argue Jews deserve all the power they have, and blacks more than they have (at you-know-who’s expense, they being at fault) – but I think (e.g.) Ron’s analysis is plenty for one to think “they have actually superior ability (be it cultural or genetic) *and* corrupt collusion”.

  139. Moi says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    It seems to me Jews are like the Indian Brahmins who want to keep control of the lower castes/peoples.

    • Replies: @Druid
    , @anonymous
  140. Gullibility doesn’t truck with exaggeration and its companion, mendacity…

    It takes a diamond to cut diamond and poison to cut poison thus it takes a Jew to expose…

    I’ve stated before without exaggeration I haven’t met a Jew that I didn’t like…

    I envy you, Ron Unz, for being able to dig up the material, and the fact that there is so much of it thanks to the record keeping, first, in European nations including Imperial Russia and second, in the Americas, whereas, if Hindu India ever wants to know how their ‘Jews’, the Jains, managed to impoverish the local Slavs, the Indian landed and landless peasantry. Of course, India was ‘blessed’ with many a type of Jew, including the real ones (which counted in its midst the local Bene Israeli, the Kochin Jews, the Baghdadi Jews and last but not least, the Ashkenazi that piggybacked with the British) unlike its linguistic sister, Europa. But for the lack of types of record with which you and others who discuss Jews and their positive as well as nefarious behaviour, the Hindu can’t discover the malpractice by Jains, which has impacted him the most since time immemorial, in spite of being curious. Sadly, the dharmic attitude of believing that one’s karma guides the fate, thus excessive desire to uncover your oppressor is swept away in fear of engendering additional negative credit and thus silently suffering the evil.

    Needless to say, a time will come when Jews will face up to the evils their forefathers may have engaged in and perhaps setting an example for others in non white Christian societies to fess up and modify their egregious mercantile behavior. Until such time, you enforce my belief that non-Jews’Jews behave just as badly, save the ritual blood drawing part, for after all, the Jain is a firm believer in ahimsa (the practice of nonviolence) to animals, while committing himsa (violence) to fellow human beings, who just happened to be non-Jains, i. e. the rest of humanity.

    P. S. It would be very interesting when the blood suckers of world will come into conflict over the loot and who will be victorious… I am putting my shekels on the lowly Chinese, for he is a godless materialist, who doesn’t get into the socio-culture of the host societies and he will eat a porker or a dog or a cat without bringing in the superstitious hogwash of religion. Let the games begin!

    • Replies: @Druid
    , @anonymous
  141. nagra says:

    enough said

    the jew one

  142. nagra says:

    show me some ‘palestinian’ as such please
    ( :

  143. renfro says:
    @Taco Town

    . I don’t distrust Jews specifically so much as I distrust the progressive left. Any opinion of Jews that I have is based on the strong correlation between the Jewish people and the progressive left.

    Its not that simple….I think you are basing that opinion on Jewish influence on immigration, social immorality etc etc.. within the ‘left’.
    The fact is there is more anti Israel at least in the left and more pro Israel within the right….the right is totally blind, or pretends to be, to what the Jews promote to US society–immigration, gays, socialism which is what the that conservatives are totally against…so go figure.
    For both parties their stand on jews and Israel comes down to where their money comes from.

  144. Art says:

    Mr. Unz: “extraordinary Jewish fecundity”

    fecundity
    noun
    1. the ability to produce an abundance of offspring or new growth; fertility.

    the ability to produce many new ideas.

    “the immense fecundity of his imagination made a profound impact on European literature”

    It is the Jews immense fecundity of imagination – it is the Jews immense ability to concoct a series of lies – that sets them apart from the rest of humanity. They believe that they have the ability to endlessly keep humanity off balance through lies. For the last seventy years the Jews have had their way with the truth.

    That is starting to come to an end. The Unz Review and American Pravda are kick starting the end of this darkness.

    The foundation of Zionism – the mendacious Talmud and its anti-human character is now exposed.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

  145. nagra says:
    @Anon

    the Skirpals are still alive
    disregard @ jeff the stryker
    all he has is the nonsense

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @annamaria
  146. Anonymous[192] • Disclaimer says:
    @raymond_k_hessel

    Read Unz last article where he goes over the Protocols.

  147. renfro says:
    @Moi

    The Jews power and influence in every US sector came to full bloom in the 60′s .
    This was about 40 years after the huge wave of 2 million + Jewish immigrants between 1890 and 1920.
    During those 40 years they took full advantages of their increased numbers and opportunities in the US to fully penetrate academia, media and government…..putting them in the positions and to further gin up the holocaust industry and Israel narrative.

    If you look at the bios of almost every single member of the current Fifth Column Jews you will see that their parents were 1900′s immigrants, mostly Polish and other eastern European countries, very few of German origin.

    • Replies: @nagra
  148. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @nagra

    Thanks for the information.

  149. renfro says:
    @Moi

    I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel’s victory in the ’67 war

    Regarding the 67 war…..the Jews embraced it and were emboldened by it because it was a sort of sexual climax release from the Jews historical impotence and powerlessness and especially during WWII. ….they wanted to see themselves as warriors and heroes .

    • Replies: @nagra
  150. @anon

    You have just raised the most important point.
    (You have my highest respect)
    And that is why Jews were always persecuted, and they will be persecuted.

  151. Anon[826] • Disclaimer says:

    What the Jews did in the past is debatable but that they now dominate US policy is not.

    So Jews are perhaps more likely to screw up than say Anglos because of their blind attachment to Israel. In any case it does not matter who is to blame for extreme immigration and off-shoring of jobs. That is where we are today. Undoubtedly Jews were major contributor to our current problems.

  152. nagra says:
    @renfro

    MarkTwain was in the area in his time
    it was a pretty empty according to him

    then Jews came and they’ve opened it economically and land worth something
    which than attracted Arabs to move in pretending to be palestinians nowadays

    • Disagree: Zumbuddi
    • Troll: renfro
    • Replies: @unseated
    , @Druid
  153. iffen says:
    @AaronB

    if Whites weren’t materialists but had their own “heroic epics”

    WTF

    We appropriated the Old Testament and it is chock full of heroes.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  154. nagra says:
    @renfro

    [It would be much better if you made greater effort to follow proper capitalization, spelling, spacing, and punctuation, especially if you're leaving such a large number of comments.]

    there was also war in 1948
    five Arab counties attacked
    a from the every single side
    they’ve lost such enterprise

    you loose war you loose territory
    that is really how the war works

    sometimes for strategic reasons
    get mature and simple get a real

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @ploni almoni
    , @Druid
    , @iffen
  155. iffen says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Haven’t you left out “empowerment”

    Good point. I’m not sure where they think it comes from or how to get it, only that it is a good thing; a sort of amulet that can be wielded by any individual regardless of the individual’s otherwise limitations.

  156. Anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains

    Have there been excavations at these sites?

    • Replies: @Mike P
    , @Wally
  157. @Lot

    Everything you want. Dude, technology is amazing. It basically means the United States is looking more and more like Orwell’s vision of the future in 1984. But with smartphones and flavored iced coffee.

  158. jsm says:
    @Colin Wright

    The point, though, is that those who wield the club of labelling all and sundry ‘anti-semites’ don’t seem to care about anti-semitism at all, per se. As many here manage to unconsciously demonstrate, you can voice the most unmeasured anti-semitism without fear of condemnation.

    That’s the singular most retarded thing I’ve read this year.

    We’re all here under ASSUMED names, because we all know what will befall us professionally and personally if we get doxxed for what we’ve said here.

    Ask Mike Enoch (real name Mike Peinovich) about being doxxed for voicing *measured* anti-semitism, much the less “un”measured anti-semitism

    • Replies: @Wally
  159. Karl says:

    one or two murders PER CENTURY, do not a “ritual” make

    Every single “ritual” in the Jewish religion, is the subject of reams and reams and reams of open-source written discussion, presenting all possible discussions about “how to do it the kosher way”

    Anytime someone pegs the value of (e.g.) soybeans or winter-wheat wrong…. a clever someone-else can game that to make a buck

    i will find a way to make a buck off of RonUnz’s incorrect “pricing”

    Anyone want to purchase indemnification in case of having your kid “ritually killed” by a Jew? i’ll be happy to take your money

    • Replies: @Art
    , @Heros
  160. Wally says:
    @iffen

    said:
    “Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.”

    PC nonsense which ignores the low IQs of blacks & browns and the fact that women rarely venture into higher paying STEM fields, nor work the hours of men, nor work the higher paying dangerous & laborious jobs.
    When there are cases of being evenly matched, equally qualified, women actually get higher pay.

    If the mythical ‘same work for less pay’ was a fact then men would never get jobs if profit oriented businesses could hire women for the same job for less money.

    The Marxist ‘Gender Pay Gap’ – Class Struggle Meets Gender Struggle
    Females Actually Earn More Than Their Equally Matched Male Counterparts

    https://sites.google.com/site/deanjackson60/the-marxist-gender-pay-gap—class-struggle-meets-gender-struggle-females-earn-more-than-their-equally-matched-male-counterparts

    • Replies: @anonymous
  161. T. Weed says:

    This brave article by Unz brought it all back: in 1985 I wrote a letter to the editor of the Hoboken (NJ) Reporter criticizing Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. I became aware of Palestinians because when I was working as a TEFL teacher in the ’70′s in Saudi Arabia I met a couple of them who had been ethnically-cleansed. Before this, like most Americans, I believed the “land without people for a people without land” hoax. So in 1985 I wrote my first letter to a start-up weekly free paper, the Hoboken Reporter, and the letter did not go unnoticed. One writer bragged about his “jew pressure” and warned me to shut up. Well, I didn’t. I wrote another letter, and another, and it was as if I had hit a hornet’s nest. The “swarm”, as Israel Shamir calls Jews who can be counted on to sting any truth-telling intruder, was all over me. The Reporter was also published in several other towns on the West Bank of the Hudson river, Jersey City, Union City, Weehawken, Secaucus, West New York, North Bergen, and my letters, and the replies to them, were published in all. I wrote under a pseudonym, T. Weed, but eventually I was found out and received several threatening phone calls. (I used the pseudonym because I was writing a book under my real name that was published by Random House and Bloomsbury Press, England, called Fool’s Paradise–travels in Saudi Arabia) The letters went on and on, back and forth, for a decade, quite instructive and entertaining, and I collected and published them in a volume called Enough Rope, dedicated to the publisher, a Jew, who gave us all enough rope. He gave us enough rope because, as he admitted in an introduction to the book, the controversy “made” his paper, but he also, in a full page, defended my right to free speech, defended me against tremendous pressure in the form of letters from the Swarm to shut my mouth, these letters always claiming “we are all for free speech, but…”
    That decade of letters, Enough Rope, 1985-1995 still appeals to a new generation of readers. and is on an outdoor table at Symposia Books in Hoboken, $5.00, donated to the store.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Anon
    , @renfro
  162. Wally says:
    @jsm

    No to mention getting physically assaulted, fire bombed. etc.

    recommended:
    French Scholar Who Questioned ‘Gas Chamber’ Claims Recants after Three-Year Campaign of Intimidation and Violence : https://codoh.com/library/document/2421/?lang=en

    Revisionist Historian Suffers Savage Beating * : https://codoh.com/library/document/300/?lang=en

    Revisionist Zündel’s Office-Home Damaged in Fire Bomb / Arson Attack, Zionist Group Claims Responsibility : https://codoh.com/library/document/2598/?lang=en

    *

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  163. Sow the Wind

    “We’re hated, we’re hated, we’re hated.”
    Oh, how hollow it rings.
    People are usually hated
    When they do hateful things.

    http://www.dcdave.com/poet10/010211.html

    The remarkable thing, though, as this article well shows, is how little Jews are hated, and for that we can credit their very powerful opinion molding apparatus.

  164. AaronB says:
    @iffen

    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists – the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    German reader who thinks we shouldn’t contact aliens because it would be dangerous? Daniel Chieh who thinks our problems are caused by some random genetic process and the solution is to colonize many planets and isolate them from each other so when the random POZ occurs it won’t spread?

    Reiner Tor who has resigned himself to obsolescence because no solutions are obvious from within the materialist paradigm?

    Or utu with his old school anti-Semitism and complete inability to grasp metaphysics and his simplistic binary way of thinking where materialism is the underlying principle?

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story – and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.

    • Replies: @iffen
  165. cassandra says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    “It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.”

    Jungian.

  166. cassandra says:
    @Anon

    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.

    The Declaration was finally made not to Weizmann but Rothschild. Curious, that.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
    , @Seraphim
  167. annamaria says:
    @nagra

    Agree. Considering the riches of available info on Skripals Affair, “jeff the stryker” is a petty provocateur littering this forum.

    Jewish State and WMD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
    “Israel has not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)… There are speculations that a chemical weapons program might be located at the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR) in Ness Ziona. …

    Israel is not a signatory to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). The US Congress Office of Technology Assessment records Israel as a country possessing a long-term, undeclared biological warfare program.

    Israel has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), but supports establishment of a Middle East Zone free of weapons of mass destruction.”
    — The hypocrites through and through.

    List of targeted killings [assasinations] performed by Israel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Israeli_assassinations

    A sample of Israeli assassinations: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/04/mossad-carries-assassinations-180422152144736.html

    Mossad idiots: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/tourists-with-a-license-to-kill-a-look-at-the-mossad-s-assassination-squads-a-678805.html

  168. Mulegino1 says:
    @Wally

    Euro-gentiles cannot be allowed to have their heroes, tales of courage & strength unless Jews create them, control the message within them.

    And ergo, the sick and perverted tales of Hollywood, the lousy music oozing from the entertainment world and the dumb goy obsession with professional sports, particularly the NFL and NBA.

    Jewry, as a hive or collective hates peace, thrives upon chaos, moral corruption and economic misery. It directs its hatred toward the best of the goyim, whom its so called “Holy” Talmud directs the Jews to kill. It can only prosper when it plays parasite to a nation or culture in declining health, as vigorous and virile cultures are immunized to it- the naming of the international Jewry and being wise to its machinations is a sine qua non of the freedom, independence, sovereignty and prosperity of any people.

  169. Mulegino1 says:
    @phil

    Five of the so called “Reinhardt” camps were simply transit camps, used for the relocation of Jews and others in German custody for purposes of resettlement and labor conscription. Majdanek/Lublin was a major SS administrative center located right at the edge and in full view of the City of Lublin.

    The most notorious of the Reinhardt camps was Treblinka II, a sub-camp for the Treblinka I labor camp. It is alleged that over 700,000 Jews were murdered using non-lethal diesel exhaust there, buried in gigantic mass graves. Never mind that mass graves containing 700,000 bodies would have to cover nearly 100 times the surface area of the mass graves at Katyn. Subsequently, the bodies were exhumed and cremated on outdoor cremation pyres which were set up on top of rail ties.

    There is absolutely no evidence that anything like this ever happened at Treblinka II. There are no signs of any mass graves or major excavations having occurred there. Aerial reconnaissance photos taken of the camp area shortly after the camp was closed show absolutely nothing. In other words, nothing happened at Treblinka II other than perhaps passengers de-training, being deloused and given a meal and continuing on their journey elsewhere.

    The Holohoax account of Treblinka II is an utter and absolute impossibility from a physical and logistical standpoint. The sick blood libel of European Christians carried out by international Jewry is collapsing under the weight of logic and empirical investigation.

  170. Phil says:
    @Anon

    The Weizmann archives in Israel. Watch David Irving’s YouTube videos on Himmler and other subjects; he talks about including it for publication.

    • Replies: @phil
  171. cassandra says:
    @lavoisier

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    This site is a breath of fresh air from an opened window.

    • Agree: geokat62, Druid
    • Replies: @Wally
  172. First, ‘we’ need to correctly define words:

    antisemitism [all Arabs, Muslims and Palestinians excluded!]

    Please continue…

  173. anon[329] • Disclaimer says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    Are you one of the experts on UR who says “military grade” and can explain what an expert means by it? Why wouldn’t the military have designed for it
    (a) a gas which disables quickly as its main intended effect
    (b) doesn’t kiĺl or permanently disable quickly to guard against accidents and allow antidotes to be administered and take effect?

  174. Art says:
    @Karl

    Anyone want to purchase indemnification in case of having your kid “ritually killed” by a Jew? i’ll be happy to take your money

    Hmm — how about an indemnity about being economically killed by a Jew?

    Not selling any of those – are you!

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

    p.s. Talmudism is Zionist is Israel. Darkness can only beget darkness.

    p.s. America will overcome this darkness.

  175. @T. Weed

    And available online for those not in or near NJ?

    • Replies: @T. Weed
  176. Wally says:
    @Anonymous

    There have been some claimed and dishonest attempts to claim that millions of jew corpses have been found, but they found only button, combs and ordinary backyard stuff.
    In spite of not finding what’s alleged it hasn’t stopped from claiming the opposite. No surprise there. The entire matter pure bluff. The excuses they come up with are laughable.
    I recommend that you visit http://www.codoh.com for more, and visit their forum to ask questions and read the huge amount of debunking information that has been collected.

    Think about, real verifiable, witnessed, and displayed archaeology excavations would end Revisionism overnight. Yet we see nothing other lies.
    CODOH has tons on the absolutely fraudulent ‘holocaust archaelology’.

    ex.:
    The Big Excuse: ‘excavation & exhumation of Jews forbidden‘: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6817

    [MORE]

    Sites Where Excavations Are Physically Obstructed, Blocked: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9171
    just a few examples:
    Treblinka

    Belzec

    Sobibor Jew corpses claimed here, so why don’t they excavate, verify, & show the world? !!!

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10610

    sham archaeologist Caroline Sturdy-Colls caught lying.: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11121

    http://www.codoh.com
    debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Only Liars Want Censorship

  177. @Anonymous

    Here is an interesting comment from the Amazon website:

    “There’s an apocryphal story about David Bowie meeting Christopher Isherwood, author of “Berlin Stories.” Bowie said something to the effect that it must have been exciting to be in Weimar Germany during the Roaring Twenties, what with the tycoons, transvestites, and spies all rubbing shoulders. At this point Isherwood felt compelled to let the relatively younger man know that he was a writer of fiction, and that the Weimar that fed his adventurous stories was very much fabricated.

    [MORE]

    The point of this anecdote is to highlight how elusive the reality of any bygone era is at a certain remove, and to further point out that Mel Gordon does the reader interested in the real history of Weimar a bit of a disservice by (by his own admission) ignoring anything that doesn’t serve his sensationalist agenda. “Eroticism” is a subjective term, and while I didn’t object to the S & M/ gender play content (or even the urolagnia/coprophagia), the sexualization of children glorified in the book (even if Gordon would deny this was his intent) was a bit much too stomach.

    Taken in the right spirit, as something in the same vein as Kenneth Anger’s “Hollywood Babylon,” which is to say a kind of salacious bit of tabloid-style light reading, the book really isn’t half bad. Some of the photos, flyers, and bits of artwork are essential Weimar memorabilia that help give the reader insight into Germany’s ill-fated experiment with democracy in the post-Wilhelmine era. But those of a more scholarly bent beware: there is a bibliography, but no sources, and when I attempted to find external corroboration of many of the assertions in the book, the only results I got online led me right back to this book. That’s a red flag right there. Tepid recommendation.”

    “Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry.” And yet, the churches and other groups (non-Jews) do very little about it. The RCC has been taken over by homos so you won’t hear condemnation of anything. The RCC is the biggest human-trafficking institution on the planet. It’s not the Jews. It’s the cucks. If Jews own the porn industry (which they don’t), why don’t they name the Jews? The Western cuck is incapable of doing anything. The cuck’s mind is so twisted by “universal church” and “universal brotherhood,” he can’t make a statement about anything. This “blame the Jews” schtick has to end. It is time to deal squarely with the problems in the West. The cucks are going to have be dragged kicking and screaming into the battle.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Bill
    , @Seraphim
  178. Wally says:
    @cassandra

    “Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?”

    Yes of course there are.
    CODOH, http://www.codoh.com and Inconvenient History, https://inconvenienthistory.com/ have incredibly brave writers

    But being a Jew, Ron probably gets more slack. For how long is the question.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @cassandra
  179. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Multiculturalism is a recipe for national suicide. Culture, including religious belief, is the unifying factor that allows strangers to work with one another, by ensuring that they share the same assumptions about morality and about correct behavior in general.

    Jews have been a problem for European societies for hundreds of years. The recent mass migration of people of multiple races and religions to Europe and its settler outposts in the America’s and the Pacific is creating cultural chaos.

    Immigrants who will not assimilate to the Christian culture of the West have no place in the West. For Africans, Asians, Hispanics and Middle-Easterners the message must be: assimilate or leave. The same for Jews who now, fortunately, have a place to go where they can live by the precepts of their ancient religion, however bizarre some of those precepts may seem to others.

    That then leaves only the problem of the Palestinians. A solution can surely be found in a deal with Egypt. The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants. The US could easily organize a purchase, funded by itself, Britain, the country primarily responsible for the dispossession of the Palestinians, the EU, Russia and some other countries, and of course Israel, which would have to pay for the land and houses of the departing Palestinians.

    At say $10,000 per hectare, a ridiculous price for a desert sand and rocky hillsides, the whole of Sinai could be purchased for $60 billion, a trivial amount in relation to the US trillion-dollar defense budget. In addition, there might be a need for something like half a trillion dollars for construction of the the cities and high-tech desert agricultural system of the new Palestinian state. But again, that is a rather trivial amount over, say ten years.

  180. iffen says:
    @AaronB

    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists – the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    I will concede leftists do believe that they are proponents of the “next” phase of universalism and egalitarianism. I do not concede that Evangelical Christians do not see themselves as protagonists in an epic narrative.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    It is not clear what the long term consequences of the collapse of the traditional family among the peons will be. The upper class families seem to be doing okay.

    Cognizance of cultural rot would seem to tie many of the commenters together, even the ones with Jews on the brain disease.

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story – and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @peterAUS
  181. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @T. Weed

    Good for you!!!

    • Replies: @T. Weed
  182. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @nagra

    We’ve all heard the arguments that Arabs moved in to work for Jews back in 1900 to 1940. We’ve all heard the argument that to the victor belongs the land We’ve all heard the arguments that the Arabs left during the battles and therefore the Jews had the God given right to take over their real estate, homes, businesses farms and other property.

    Those are nursery school level Zionist arguments. We’re all Stanford Harvard PhD & professor level anti Zionists.

    Your arguments would go over in a Jewish private school Kindergarten, or a Hadassah luncheon but not here.

    • Replies: @nagra
  183. Anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:
    @Verymuchalive

    The Czar’s assassins left the following written on the wall at the scene of the murders.

    “Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht / Von seinen Knechten umgebracht,” “Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves.”

    Belshazzar, the Gentile king of Babylon who, in the Old Testament story, saw ‘the writing on the wall’ foretelling his destruction (Daniel 5) and was killed as punishment for his offences against Israel’s God. In a clever play on the Heine quotation, the unknown writer, almost certainly one of the killers, has substituted Belsatzar for Heine’s spelling Belsazar in order to signal even more clearly his intended symbolism. The Heine inscription described the racial / ethnic nature of the murders: ‘A Gentile king had just been killed as an act of Jewish retribution.’

    • Replies: @Anon
  184. unseated says:
    @nagra

    Palestine in 1948:

    “Making the desert bloom – a myth examined ” by Alan George.

  185. Citizen24 says:

    Many thanks to Ron Unz for this website and its many insightful articles, please continue!

    • Agree: mark green
  186. Bill Jones says: • Website

    It is of course not anti-semitism. It is counter-semitism.

  187. @Wally

    ‘…No to mention getting physically assaulted, fire bombed. etc…’

    Point taken. However, there is a specific narrative here that calls the guardians of orthodoxy to arms: ancient Israel — the Holocaust — modern Israel-the need to uncritically support Israel. It’s not so much anti-semites in general who become the focus of attack, but those who question the specific narrative culminating in ‘our only ally and the the only democracy in the Middle East.’

    You can assert the most extravagant things about the Protocols. No one will care. But dare to suggest that Israeli ‘archeology’ has an agenda, and you’re for it.

    It has struck me. It isn’t ‘antisemitism’ that is the issue — it’s not viewed with favor, but no one really cares. It’s anything that leads to a critical view of Israel that is targeted. When people object to ‘anti-semitism,’ nine times out of ten, it’s ‘anti-Israelism’ they’re objecting to. Interfere in that narrative, and you’d better have tenure.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Anon
  188. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:
    @utu

    Oppenheimer was Jewish. A great scientist.

  189. anastasia says:

    Mr. Unz thinks alot about unthinkable things.

  190. ValmMond says:

    The submission of American politicians to zionist interests is not just complete and consummated but also source of much entertainment and mockery for their abusive overlords. Look at this hapless, obsequious, altright Alabama wretch. After being thoroughly humiliated by the putative israeli interviewer, Moore walks out, stating that he’s still a “supporter of Israel”.

    They’d rather be falsely accused of pedophilia than be suspected of lacking loyalty for their racist, parasitic masters.

  191. anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m afraid we may be too deep into the Jewish Problem now to avoid a terrible calamity.

    The Israelis were involved with 9/11 and they have distorted the facts of WW2 and the Holocaust in such a way that the public simply can’t find out the truth. I suspect most at the top levels of government understand the reality, but there is nothing that can be done.

    The internet allows for the most obscure information to spread rapidly, and people are eventually going to find out the colossal scam that has been pulled, and they are going to be very unhappy. Learning some of this information literally put me in a depression. It will put many others in a rage.

    There are huge problems brewing and I’m sure the Israelis are aware of this and they’ve planned accordingly. I have a bad feeling the age old Jewish Question might be coming to a head soon.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wade
  192. @Heros

    Lol. Poor Colin…

    To put it mildly, you’re missing the target.

    ‘…Get a grip on in Colin! Week after week, Ron Unz has been chronicling jewish perfidity and coverups of centuries of crimes against humanity. At least on
    und.com, if you don’t agree with Ron’s analysis you had a loads of chances to debate it there. Instead, like all the other arrogant jews, you start your entire comment kvetching and flinging spittle with the same old “anti-semite” canard. Give us a break for crying out loud.

    There is no more discussion, except among you jewish racist supremacist…

    You can’t win. I’ve been banned for ‘antisemitism.’ Youall are going to have to make up your mind: am I an ‘anti-semite’ or a ‘Jewish racial supremacist’? It seems improbable I could be both.

    Anyway, thanks. You’ve given me some amusing lines to quote. Colin Wright: Jewish racist supremacist.

    You can’t win.

  193. ohmy says:

    Today I read an article published by VT which mentioned that in Russia there has been a call for investigation(s) into the Bolshevik’s involvement in the 1918 murder of Czar Nicholas, and his entire family. Also, the investigation will attempt to determine if there are any connections, links, or similarities between the Romanov killings and, earlier assassinations of Russian leaders which seem to happen every 100 years (cough cough, psst, it’s 2018). I can hear the anti-Semitism cries building. If the Russian inquiry doesn’t get shut down it may just be very interesting.

  194. @Hippopotamusdrome

    For a description of the Dreyfus Affair as a Psy-OP (a fake incident) to engineer public opinion leading to the First Zionist Congress of Basel one year later see

    http://mileswmathis.com/dreyfus.pdf

    Journalists, like Herzl and Zola are what is now called Presstitutes.

  195. phil says:
    @nagra

    If the US didn’t matter, the Jews would not have been so eager to get it involved in both wars.

    The D-Day invasion on June 6, 1944 was not a small operation.

  196. phil says:

    Volume 2 of Churchill’s War, by David Irving, has a chapter entitled “We Did It Before and We Can Do It Again.” The chapter refers to the role played by Jews in getting the US involved in World War I, and the Jews’ confidence that they could do an encore performance for World War II. There is an acknowledgement given early in the chapter to the Weizmann archives. On Youtube Irving expresses amazement that he was allowed to access them.

  197. Bill Jones says: • Website

    Longhand was right. Cromwell was wrong.
    Keep the tickets out.

  198. AaronB says:
    @iffen

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.

    Actually, it has recently occured to me that Christians were the Leftists of their time – proponents of “progress” – and the conservatives of their time were the Pagan restorationists. And Muslims were similarly the Leftists of their time and the Pagan Arabs were the conservatives.

    If this is true, then conservatives have never historically won ever, anywhere – and that “narratives” of moving towards some goal of perfection will always win.

    This means that to defeat the Left, you must flip the script and cast them in the mold of conservatives trying to hold back progress towards some goal of perfection, and that “conservatives” had better become the new Leftists! – come up with some new new goal of “progress”.

    Only Leftists can defeat Leftists, only progressives can defeat progressives – conserving the old cannot win. Ideas of stability, homeostasis, and the like, cannot win.

    If older values are correct, as I believe they are in many cases, then we must learn to see them as steps on the path to some perfect goal, as exciting and sexy because standing for “true” progress.

    The “traditional” family – defeat is written in the words. Conjures up images of stability and safety but also boredom. Why not the family as the environment in which the task of self perfection – “progress” – can best take place. That is sexier and more exciting.

    But anyways my point is that many on Karlins blog seem to genuinely resent women qua women – and without some ideal for women, even if it involves different rights and duties than men, you again aren’t going to win. Christianity had an ideal for women that was better than the Pagan one – which was focused on the physical.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.

    And there is no organized opposition because there is no Platonic Idea around which they can rally – while the Left has one. The Right seems to just be a headless chicken- all body, no head.

  199. peterAUS says:
    @iffen

    ….They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition…

    Then, perhaps, the question would be: why is there no opposition?
    I don’t know, just feel, that digging out that truth could prove quite unpopular around here.

    • Replies: @iffen
  200. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB

    Only Leftists can defeat Leftists, only progressives can defeat progressives – conserving the old cannot win. Ideas of stability, homeostasis, and the like, cannot win.

    You sure?

    Don’t know.

    Franco, for example.
    Then, more recently, Nationalists winning over Communists in Eastern Europe after the fall of The Wall. We could agree, I guess, that Nationalism is a bit older than Communism.

    And there is no organized opposition because there is no Platonic Idea around which they can rally – while the Left has one. The Right seems to just be a headless chicken- all body, no head.

    In the West.

    In the East…not so sure about that.

    Do a (mental) test: imagine that US (military) power can’t get delivered in Balkans anymore.
    Or Russian (military) power can’t get delivered in Donbass. Or some other places.

    Watch……..

    • Replies: @AaronB
  201. ohmy says:
    @Anon

    Anon 208 asks; ” I still don’t know as the Wikipedia entry is somehow mysteriously “archived”. Is this a known condition?
    Anon 208, who do you think is the editor in-chief of Wikipedia, and also Wikileaks?

    • Replies: @Anon
  202. nagra says:
    @Anon

    so you might explain me what language your ‘Palestinians’ speak and what literature and culture they rely on in all your arguments

  203. ohmy says:

    It’s been years since I searched the internet for news print references prior to 1930 of 6 million Jews dead or dying. I was amazed when I discovered over 25 newspaper articles, some from as early as the 1890′s, either proclaiming, or predicting 6 million Jews are in danger of dying, or starving in Eastern Europe or Russia. Many of the articles asked for donations. Check it out yourself. It has been a scam for 130 years.

    • Replies: @Wally
  204. Thomm says:

    This is interesting. On ‘What would you do?’, a group of actors assumes their roles. A white girl has a Jewish boyfriend, and her parents disapprove. The show tries to draw out some White Trashionalists from the patronage, but to no avail, since normal Americans are not like that :

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=RGeTDN4knlM

  205. Ace says:
    @Lot

    Answer: That your search terms need to be revised.

  206. phil says:
    @nagra

    The Jews think otherwise, and on average they are not dumb.

  207. renfro says:
    @T. Weed

    Bravo……good for you.

    • Replies: @T. Weed
  208. T. Weed says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    No, Wizard, I never bothered to publicize it outside of Hoboken, or its sequel, the next decade of letters called More Rope, because the argument continued, not as heavy as before but there were still defenders of Israel (and other indefensible topics) willing to hang themselves. Now everybody in town knows who I am, because (along with a couple of other books of mine on the table), Fool’s Paradise, the Arabia book, was shortlisted for the Pulitzer Prize and there’s a big blown up letter in the window from Bloomsbury Press in London congratulating me.

    I’d be glad to send you a copy of Enough Rope, but you may not want to divulge your address. Better, actually, that you buy from the bookstore, for bookstores in Internet America struggle to make a living. Symposia books, 510 Washington St., Hoboken, NJ 07030. [email protected].

    Thanks for your inquiry. If you do read the letters, I hope you get a good laugh out of them.

  209. AaronB says:
    @peterAUS

    That’s a good point about nationalism – but I think what we are seeing in places like Russia and Poland is a resurgence of religious nationalism – pure nationalism, without a Platonic Idea, just materialism, seems to have no long term success anywhere. I don’t think the attempt to revive it among materialist western right wingers will work. I think they fundamentally misunderstand this.

    In the context of a failed Communism, religious nationalism appears as progressive – as an exciting step in the direction of progress towards a higher state.

    Its not that old traditional ideas can’t be revived – its that I think conservatives basically misunderstand traditional ideas. In their time, traditional ideas were meant to facilitate the self-perfection of man – not provide stability, safety, or homeostasis. Christianity was a program for the perfection of man – not social stability.

    Traditional ideas were based on a Platonic Idea – never materialism. The attempt to revive traditional ideas on a materialist basis, because they provide stability, seems a misunderstanding. In fact, traditional ideas provide stability because they were accepted as part of the plan of self-perfection. That’s why they secured consent – i.e became the basis of a stable society. People accept a social organization that they believe will assist in self-perfection, and that is the source of social stability.

    As for military power projection, once local power balances alter its hard to predict what will come to seem “progressive”. And short term social expedients taken in chaotic cobditions don’t necessarily translate into long term social organization.

    That’s my take, at any rate.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  210. @nagra

    Why, what big teeth you have grandma.

  211. phil says:
    @Phil

    In Volume 2 of Churchill’s Wars there is a chapter entitled “We Did It Before, and We Can Do It Again.” The title reflects the success the Jews had in getting the US into World War I, and that they were confident that they could do an encore performance for World War II. Early on in the chapter there is an acknowledgement given to the Weizmann Archives; Irving relies on primary source documents. On Youtube Irving expresses amazement that he was given access to the archives.

  212. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @iffen

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.

    And who are these “whites” who unfairly deny their success, are they whites or are they (((whites)))? The institutions that are the most discriminatory towards women and minorities are Hollywood, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, management consulting, law firms, upper echelons of academia, media, businesses…all are dominated by (((whites))).

  213. @cassandra

    That Rothschild was the head of the British Zionist organization in Britain. To who should the Declaration have been addressed? Weizmann was not British. Have you considered informing yourself?

  214. Anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Let wealthy Jews negotiate a price for Palestine with the Palestinian leadership. And let wealthy Jews pay for it.

    • Replies: @Heros
  215. escobar says:

    Jew Derangement Syndrome?

    The Kushners and gang from Goldman Sachs embody the American dream: amassing wealth. In a culture where nothing matters as much, Jews rose to great power. They could not have done it had the Sermon on the Mount had as many readers as “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?” had watchers. The peddler in the old shtetl got the chance in America to run a private equity firm and amass assets of $12 billion. As that swell fellow Larry Summers said “We’re the insiders now.” They played the American game and the few fielded the strongest team. The Asian-Americans will challenge.
    We are a market democracy, not a people’s democracy.
    “The world is not run by justice and morality, but by power and money, and money buys power.”
    Stevenson warned us in 1956, Ike in 1961, Carter in 1980. Eh.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @CanSpeccy
  216. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    The Czar’s assassins left the following written on the wall at the scene of the murders.

    “Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht / Von seinen Knechten umgebracht,” “Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves.”

    Citation?

  217. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    But dare to suggest that Israeli ‘archeology’ has an agenda, and you’re for it.

    What is the agenda of Israeli archeology?

    • Replies: @bjondo
  218. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    Learning some of this information literally put me in a depression.

    What specifically were some of the things that had an impact on you?

  219. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Sounds like a good plan. Or simply subsidize the Palestinians at $10,000 per head to relocate there. As there are 4.4 million Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza Strip combined, that should only cost $44 Billion, chump change compared to the $2.4 Trillion we’ve spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars since 2003. Leave the entire Mideast to Israel after that. If they can’t make peace with anyone it’s their wars to fight.

    Someone needs to go sell this “diversity is strength”, “immigrants enrich their host country” propaganda to the Egyptians. Aren’t Jews good at sales?

  220. renfro says:
    @CanSpeccy

    I see you are promoting the ‘Zionist Jerusalem Summit’ plan for transferring the Palestines out of Palestine.
    Since the Palestine’s ancestors were the first and constant inhabitants of Palestine -going back 9000 years….it should be the Jews who are transferred out–don’t you think.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  221. Druid says:
    @nagra

    You’re right about many immigrant Moslems to your country,nut your defense and outcry on behalf of the Talmudists is pure stupidity!

  222. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @lavoisier

    Hear hear. If more Jews were as honest and open to self-critique as Ron Unz they wouldn’t have been so distrusted throughout history. As it is, he is a rare bird. One in 15 million. Cheers to Ron, for this article and this awesome website.

  223. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @escobar

    The Asian-Americans will challenge.

    The Jews are carefully grooming East Indians to take over as puppet CEOs, college deans, bureaucrats, judges, prosecutors etc. They make for the perfect puppets as they worship whites, are mostly English speaking, loquacious as the Jews, smarter than blacks but have dark skin, and aren’t as big of a threat as the East Asians who are equally smart and cunning as the Jews, but aren’t as loquacious or politically ambitious as the Indians.

    But the Jews should be careful what they wish for. The Indians are as clannish and politically ambitious as the Jews, and they are far larger in number. It won’t take long before they supplant the Jews as the dominant group, especially once Trump and the GOP traitors eliminate the per country limit on green cards so we can be swamped by Indians.

    • Replies: @renfro
    , @jsm
  224. Wally says:
    @ohmy

    said:
    ” I was amazed when I discovered over 25 newspaper articles, some from as early as the 1890′s, either proclaiming, or predicting 6 million Jews are in danger of dying, or starving in Eastern Europe or Russia. ”

    Here you go, Jews have been pushing their ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1823:

    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF

    and:
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Heros
  225. Druid says:
    @nagra

    Your writing doesn’t correspond to the verbal pro -Israli diatribe in your above post. You must be a zio shill

  226. Anonymous[161] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen

    Sorry but the sexual deviance in Weimar Germany is well documented. There are other books that say the same thing. Your anecdote adding nothing.

    This “blame antisemitism” schtick is tiresome. According to Jews, Jews have never ever done anything wrong and if you point anything out you are an antisemite. There are others who participate in porn, but Jews absolutely rule this industry.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  227. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB

    A thoughtful post.

    ….traditional ideas were meant to facilitate the self-perfection of man – not provide stability, safety, or homeostasis. Christianity was a program for the perfection of man – not social stability.

    …..traditional ideas provide stability because they were accepted as part of the plan of self-perfection.

    I am not quite sure I get this.
    Feels as a deep topic. Not well versed in that I am afraid.

    A couple of things: the concept of “self-perfection” in, say, traditional Catholic/Orthodox Christianity, with accepting that a man is a sinner and only though Jesus he/she can find salvation.
    Then, I can get that top thinkers of those nations maybe thought along those lines; common folk, though, based their nationalism on simple living with people who shared the same values in life. Sometimes even just the same customs. The sense of belonging. The perception of “us” and “them” as the bottom line.

    You want a problem to ponder about?
    Here it is, then:
    Why such ..animosity….. then, between Catholics and Orthodox in Balkans and Ukraine? The same, now dormant, between Protestant and Catholics in N.I.?

    I guess that your approach to nationalism is, say, what…..metaphysical?
    Mine is way, way below. Just blood and soil, in that order. “Us” vs “them”.

    West is doomed re nationalism. Maybe. Not quite sure.
    All those wars of Catholics vs Protestants…………..and we are talking about people of the same race.
    Now, that “we” vs “them” is much more visible.

    ….short term social expedients taken in chaotic cobditions don’t necessarily translate into long term social organization.

    Agree.
    Again, so what? If it works during my lifetime fine (say, if I were a young man). After me, their problem. Something like that.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  228. cassandra says:
    @Wally

    I mean intellectually honest: Unz presents evidence and sources pointing one way, then another, and then arbitrates only so far as reasonable. What separates this approach is that other articles tend to advocate for or against specific political positions. I prefer to learn facts first, and stave off taking sides to the very end, in a mostly futile effort to maintain objectivity.

    Thanks for the inconvenienthistory link. I’ve already bought the codoh library. I’m aware that there are many other brave writers, and didn’t intend to diminish anyone else’s courage.

  229. Druid says:
    @Anon

    Really, amazing that after being killed, they’re still alive and in British hands!

  230. Druid says:
    @Dagon Shield

    I would like to know more about what you say about the Jains.

    • Replies: @Dagon Shield
  231. Druid says:
    @nagra

    Hey nagar. You seem to be a new commenter here. We’ve heard all your BS before and it has been debunked repeatedly. You obviously are a new paid troll. Get a life !

    • Replies: @nagra
  232. Seraphim says:
    @cassandra

    The Declaration was addressed in fact to the Zionist Federation.

    Why was the letter containing the Declaration addressed to Rothschild?
    I can’t better answer it than quoting a short but comprehensive article:

    “The Balfour Declaration – Why Lord Rothschild?” by Neville Teller:

    https://www.jpost.com/Blogs/A-Mid-East-Journal/The-Balfour-Declaration-why-Lord-Rothschild-505748

    [MORE]

    “In 1917 the Board of Deputies [of British Jews] was led by David Lindo Alexander, and the AJA [Anglo-Jewish Association] by Claude Montefiore. Both were convinced anti-Zionists. In their view national identity and religion were completely separate. They were Englishmen of the Jewish persuasion. There was no such thing as the Jewish nation, and they saw absolutely no need for a separate state for Jews.
    The Conjoint Committee, composed of selected members from the Board and the AJA , was led jointly by Alexander and Montefiore. Aware that Chaim Weizmann had gained the ear of the prime minister and leading members of the Cabinet, and fearful that the government was on the verge of declaring itself supportive of the Zionist cause, the joint chairmen drew up a statement of their position on the Zionist issue on behalf of the Conjoint Committee. Dated May 17, 1917, they sent it to The Times.
    The editor of The Times, a member of the upper echelons of the British establishment by virtue of his position, was George Geoffrey Dawson. He was certainly aware that prime minister Lloyd George, foreign secretary Lord Balfour, and other Cabinet ministers favored the Zionist cause. It was no secret, either, that a conference had been convened in London by the English Zionist Federation for Sunday, 20 May, 1917.
    No doubt to their disappointment, Alexander and Montefiore did not find their letter in the correspondence columns on Friday 18 May. Nor did it appear in the Saturday edition. The Zionist conference duly took place on the Sunday. As it got under way, Weizmann made a momentous announcement. “I am authorized to state in this assembly that His Majesty’s Government is ready to support our plans”. For the first time Weizmann declared publicly that the Zionists could rely upon British support and protection during their progress towards their final aim – “the creation of a Jewish Commonwealth in Palestine”.
    The wind had been taken out of the Conjoint Committee’s sails. Their letter was held back for another few days, while news of Weizmann’s announcement spread. When it finally appeared on the 24th of May, its attack on Zionism and its argument that establishing a Jewish national identity in Palestine would stamp Jews everywhere as ‘strangers in their native lands’, seemed petulant and ineffective.
    On the Monday morning The Times published three rebuttals. A letter from Lord Rothschild emphasized that the anti-Zionists did not represent Britain’s Jewish community. Britain’s Chief Rabbi Joseph Hertz asserted that the views of the Conjoint Committee belonged to a very small minority. A letter from Chaim Weizmann, as chairman of the English Zionist Federation, regretted “that there should be even two Jews who think it their duty to exert such influence as they may command against the realization of a hope which has sustained the Jewish nation through 2,000 years of exile, persecution, and temptation.”
    In the next few weeks the pro-Zionist Jewish Chronicle was bombarded with letters and statements from rabbis, readers, community leaders, synagogues, and Jewish organizations, the vast majority opposing the anti-Zionists. The resultant furore led the Board of Deputies to permit a vote to be tabled censuring the Conjoint Committee, and on June 17 it was passed by 56 to 51, with six abstentions – presumably the six Board members on the Committee. The result: the resignation of the Conjoint members, swiftly followed by that of the President of the Board, David Lindo Alexander, the co-signatory of the letter. Elected in his place was Sir Stuart Samuel, elder brother of Herbert Samuel, a former Home Secretary and later to be the first High Commissioner in Palestine.
    When Balfour penned his historic letter only four months later, the Board of Deputies was still heavily tainted by the Conjoint Committee affair, and Samuel had scarcely settled into his new position as its President. The Declaration could not be despatched to an organization so equivocal about Zionism. Lord Rothschild, a leading figure in the Anglo-Jewish community and a strong supporter of Zionism, who had written to The Times to condemn the Conjoint Committee’s statement, was the obvious recipient.
    On Sunday December 2, 1917 London’s Royal Opera House was filled to capacity. Rothschild was chairing a meeting of thanksgiving for the Declaration – thanksgiving directed, one presumes, equally to the Almighty and the British government. Besides the government officials present, Zionist dignitaries were led by Chaim ‎Weizmann and included Nahum Sokolow, secretary-general of the World Zionist Congress, Herbert Samuel and Chief Rabbi Joseph Hertz. After speeches by clergy, officials and even an Arab representative from Palestine, the occasion ended with loud cheers and the audience singing “Hatikvah.”

  233. Druid says:
    @CanSpeccy

    If you’re not an American Indian, the best suggestion is that YOU leave!

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  234. Heros says:
    @Anonymous

    Jews don’t pay retail. Just ask a Palestinian.

  235. renfro says:

    The Jews are furious that this bill hasnt passed yet. All these demands Jews make on the US and tax payer money make me anti Jewish in general although I will recognize a few ‘righteous Jews just as Jews recognize only a very few righteous gentiles.

    115th CONGRESS
    1st Session

    H. R. 1911

    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to monitor and combat anti-Semitism globally, and for other purposes.

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    April 5, 2017

    [MORE]

    Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Engel, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Bilirakis, and Mr. Veasey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

    A BILL

    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to monitor and combat anti-Semitism globally, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
    SECTION 1. Short title.

    This Act may be cited as the “Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act of 2017”.

    SEC. 2. Finding.

    Congress finds that since the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004 was enacted, in many foreign countries acts of anti-Semitism have been frequent and wide in scope, the perpetrators and variety of threats to Jewish communities and their institutions have proliferated, and in some countries anti-Semitic attacks have increased in frequency, scope, violence, and deadliness.

    SEC. 3. Monitoring and Combating anti-Semitism.

    Subsection (a) of section 59 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2731) is amended—

    (1) in paragraph (2)—

    (A) in subparagraph (A)—

    (i) by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate”; and

    (ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Special Envoy shall report directly to the Secretary.”; and

    (B) in subparagraph (B)—

    (i) by striking the first sentence; and

    (ii) in the third sentence, by striking “The Secretary may allow such officer or employee to retain the position (and the responsibilities associated with such position)” and inserting “Such officer or employee may not retain the position (or the responsibilities associated with such position)”; and

    (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

    “(3) DUTIES.—The Special Envoy shall serve as the primary advisor to, and coordinate efforts across, the United States Government relating to monitoring and combating anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement that occur in foreign countries.

    “(4) RANK AND STATUS OF AMBASSADOR.—The Special Envoy shall have the rank of ambassador.

    “(5) QUALIFICATIONS.—The Special Envoy should be a person of recognized distinction in the field of—

    “(A) combating anti-Semitism; or

    “(B) religious freedom.”.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  236. renfro says:
    @anon

    The Jews are carefully grooming East Indians to take over as puppet CEOs, college deans, bureaucrats, judges, prosecutors etc

    Correct—-they are doing just that.

  237. APilgrim says:

    One of the premises of Martin Luther, is now null & void. Both the USA & Russia have recognized Jerusalem as the capital city of Israel. (I am a Lutheran.)

    On the Jews and Their Lies, Martin Luther, (1543), Translated by Martin H. Bertram, http://www.prchiz.pl/pliki/Luther_On_Jews.pdf

    Therefore a Christian should be content and not argue with the Jews. But if you have to or want to talk with them, do not say any more than this: “Listen, Jew, are you aware that Jerusalem and your sovereignty, together with your temple and priesthood, have been destroyed for over 1,460 years?” For this year, which we Christians write as the year 1542 since the birth of Christ, is exactly 1,468 years, going on fifteen hundred years, since Vespasian and Titus destroyed Jerusalem and expelled the Jews from the city. Let the Jews bite on this nut and dispute this question as long as they wish. For such ruthless wrath of God is sufficient evidence that they assuredly have erred and gone astray. Even a child can comprehend this. For one dare not regard God as so cruel that he would punish his own people so long, so terribly, so unmercifully, and in addition keep silent, comforting them neither with words nor with deeds, and fixing no time limit and no end to it. Who would have faith, hope, or love toward such a God? Therefore this work of wrath is proof that the Jews, surely rejected by God, are no longer his people, and neither is he any longer their God. This is in accord with Hosea 1:9, “Call his name Not my people, for you are not my people and I am not your God.”

  238. APilgrim says:

    What does this phrase mean to the Ashkenazim? Bible: Ezekiel Chapter 18, Verse 1:

    … “The word of the LORD came unto me again, saying,” …

    Did Ezekiel hear something? Did he read something? Did someone say something?

    Or is it a literary technique for telling an entertaining old story?

  239. @CanSpeccy

    Ridiculous. Your thinking is as outlandishly off the planet rational as mine. Actually I think I prefer your solution to my Taxpayer State single state solution and yours would be cheap at three times the price – which might be getting closer than your $60 billion to make it work (think of how much Egypt would calculate that it could extort. Think of the incentives to get the first million Palestinians to move. Fortunately a lot of Israeli research and development for the Negev would be a plus for Sinai).

    My Taxpayer State would put off Palestinian political control by reproductive superiority by 100 years or more by giving substantial additional political power – not least blocking power – to serious net taxpayers. It is just an old idea revived with modifications for this century.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  240. Heros says:
    @Wally

    All the centuries of jewish genocides of Christians are starting to catch up with them, 30m Ukrainians starved, 30m Russians gulaged, 30m Germans firebombed and obliterated. So obviously, 6 million is no longer sufficient to keep the profits from the cult of Holohoax flowing.

    No Worries, the jews have a typical jew solution : We’ll tell even bigger lies!

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  241. Anon[235] • Disclaimer says:
    @ohmy

    Please elaborate. I assume you refer to a Jew being editor-in-chief of Wikipedia and therefore presumptively in favour of Jews doing the editing but your reference to Wikileaks completely throws me. After all Julian Assange is no special friend of Israel or Jews.

    Anyway,, what can you tell me about the “archiving”?

  242. Hi Ron,

    According to Eric Clopper, the world’s foremost authority on circumcision, anti-semitism in Europe came about because Christians were disgusted at, and fearful of, the Jewish practice of circumcision.

    I highly recommend this lecture by Clopper (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCuy163srRc), which got him fired from Harvard.

    • Replies: @Heros
  243. “A specific group of people have controlled power and money for centuries. They’re the source of most of the the conflict and suffering throughout history and during the present day. In the name of progress and our national virtue, they should be named and shamed whenever possible. They should be denied access to wealth and positions of power, in favor of people who are more ideal in the way they look and think. If this group of people show any resistance, we must (regretfully, of course) respond by denying them the very protection of rights and law.”

    “I had no idea you were anti-Semitic.”

    “I was talking about old white men.”

    “Oh, that’s totally cool then. Right on.”

  244. Anne Lid says:
    @Patricus

    Read up on the Tiszaeszlár blood libel. The papers of the era covered it all over Europe, and in the end they were exonerated. I believed for a long time the official story. A servant girl, Eszter Solymosi, disappeared. A body was found in the Tisza river 80 days after her disappearance in her clothes, and the neck was untouched. When I read – only two years ago!- the exact words of the doctors who examined the cadaver it is quite clear that it did not spend 80 days submerged in water. It was a different woman in the clothes Eszter wore on the last day anyone has seen her alive. Make of it what you will!

  245. j2 says:
    @Anonymous

    “Of course in popular culture it is always the Catholic church that gets the blame”

    Yeah, isn’t it strange. Check how many paedophiles among the Catholic priests there actually are compared to the average population, and how many actually attack children under certain age versus how many are simply homos who like teenage boys. Homos were accepted as priests after the Second Conclave, applauded as a great step forward by the mass media (in destroying this pillar of the gentile society). I checked all this once and the results were quite revealing, I mean of the mass media control of the public opinion. Not that I am Catholic, far from it. Just interesting to notice these things. A war on the Catholic Church, it is.

    • Replies: @Ivan
  246. iffen says:
    @AaronB

    – and that “narratives” of moving towards some goal of perfection will always win.

    The narrative of restoring what was great in the past works pretty well at times.

    But anyways my point is that many on Karlins blog seem to genuinely resent women qua women – and without some ideal for women, even if it involves different rights and duties than men, you again aren’t going to win.

    Yes, I agree. There is a lack of vision.

  247. iffen says:
    @nagra

    Keep on keeping on, nagra, you’ll run them out of debunking oil yet.

  248. anonymous[271] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “The Palestinians living among us have, for the most part, earned a not-unfounded reputation for being cheaters, because of their spirit of usury since their exile. …”

    Immanuel Kant, from “Anthropology from the Pragmatic Viewpoint

    Of course, Mr.Kunt obviously got the right idea about Judenscum, but he whitewashes the satanic levels of greed and psychopathy of his own kind.

  249. iffen says:
    @peterAUS

    Then, perhaps, the question would be: why is there no opposition?

    A serious error on my part. I should have said there is no organized opposition.

    Many commenters here consider themselves in opposition, but few belong to any organized opposition.

  250. Anon[349] • Disclaimer says:

    As an atheist Anglican I used to be mildly worried about the Catholic Church teaching its flock, including Catholic politicians, to vote for social policies – in the end to be enforced by criminal law – that I disagreed with. In Australia, as even now in Ireland, that seems to have been wiped out by the Church losing nearly all power and all moral credibility. Indeed it seems to stand for nothing much that matters apart from largely ignored dogma on when a zygote becomes a person and how human embryos may be treated. Now one has to worry rather that those like Cardinal Pell** who have argued that Western societies are living on their Christian legacy are right and that it matters.

    I don’t know what the likely outcome of lost faith is. I recall thinking that bringing up children with specifically religious moral reaching was dangerous because the likely rational overthrow of supernatural belief would be a case of the baby out with the bathwater. Suddenly a lot of young people in increasing numbers from the 50s on were finding themselves detached from their religious grounding and without more than glib and superficial ways to reason about morality. Maybe it hasn’t worked out too badly, and maybe legacy emotions have had some place (certainly educated Catholics seem less likely to condone abortion than those who may still be nominally Anglican, not that I find that agreeable to me). What does seem.apparent is that it is by no means only Jews in the media who are responsible for the anti Catholic bias that I think is probably a justified complaint against a lot of media institutions like the BBC and ABC. Maybe though the revolt against the parents syndrome amongst journalists is largely a thing of the past, of say the 50s to 90s. That would fit in more than one way. After all who needs to kick the Church when it is down.

    **Yes the Cardinal against whom charges of sexually molesting young candidates for the priesthood, or some such, 30 or 40 years ago, have been brought in Victoria. I can almost hear his forceful Jewish counsel, known for the acquittals of some very lucky too-sharp-by-half businessmen, making the jury understand that this is a true witch hunt. 300 years ago the jury would have a mind set ready to receive the totally untrue fantasies passing for evidence of witchcraft. Now ambitious or sectarian prosecutors are seeking to rely on the MSM created mindset that this is what celibate Catholic clergy do.

  251. @Heros

    I also have the idea that holocaust propaganda has intensified lately.
    Any time someone jewish dies who survived the holocaust, big news, in the Netherlands, even more in France: Simone Weil.
    I wonder what the strategy is for the period, coming soon, when there are no more Nazi criminals alive, and no holocaust survivors alive.
    What the propagandists fail to see is that the younger people are not interested at all in WWII or holocaust: history, long ago.

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @anarchyst
  252. @AaronB

    I like your contribution. Let me add the thought that the Christians of the first century might not have had much in common with the winners of three and more centuries later. And of course Shia and Sunni were split from early on.

    Moreover the pagan conservatives had a pretty good run for the few hundred years of progressive Christian activism and struggle. Did the Romans use CIA or Comintern sophistication to prolong Christian divisions one wonders.

  253. annamaria says:
    @Patricus

    “Gaza Flotilla Ship Al Awda Violently Seized by Israelis, USS Liberty Survivor Amongst Those Captured:” https://consortiumnews.com/2018/07/30/gaza-flotilla-ship-al-awda-violently-seized-by-israelis-uss-liberty-survivor-amongst-those-captured/

    “People on board were tasered and hit by masked IOF soldiers. Do not believe reports of peaceful interception… blood on the deck of the Al Awda as the last participants were being dragged off the ship..”

    “Meadors [a survivor of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty] was a signalman on the bridge of the USS Liberty when it was attacked by Israeli warplanes and submarines, killing 34 U.S. sailors.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=cclT8AV98VM

  254. annamaria says:
    @renfro

    The treasonous and money-loving sponsors of the Bill — Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Engel, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Bilirakis, and Mr. Veasey — should watch this bloody abuse of an honorable American veteran by the lawless IDF: https://consortiumnews.com/2018/07/30/gaza-flotilla-ship-al-awda-violently-seized-by-israelis-uss-liberty-survivor-amongst-those-captured/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=cclT8AV98VM

  255. bjondo says:
    @Anon

    That current Jew has right to steal land and kill Palestinians.

    Of course Jew has no right to Palestinian land and Israeli Archeology has proven the Jew biblical stories to be fiction.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  256. anonymous[271] • Disclaimer says:
    @Heros

    so I ask him to protect you.

    You mean you ask the following figure to protect Mr.Unz (and protection of Mr.U is surely a noble endeavour, I agree);

    http://factsanddetails.com/world/cat55/sub353/item1403.html

    Now, this figure should resemble one of your great great grandfathers. Do you think one of great great grandfathers has the power to protect anyone… Mr.Pagan? ;)

  257. lavoisier says: • Website
    @fnn

    Pretty interesting approach to this issue!!

  258. @Anon

    All eight who did kill Czar and his family were Hungarian Jews. (The driver was Russian.)
    Thouse eight Jews did not speak German. After picking up the diamonds, they caught the train back to Hungary, and they disappeared.

    • Replies: @Anne Lid
  259. anonymous[271] • Disclaimer says:
    @Moi

    Hence why the two are such loving bedfellows. You should read some of the most nauseating verbal fellation each other engage in some forums.

    The clergy of the Judenscum went so far as to proclaim that Hindoo paganism is not Avodah Zarah (idolatry). Say what?

    Yeah, you scratch my nethers, I scratch yours…

  260. anonymous[271] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dagon Shield

    Yes, you are right. Jains are as cultist as the Judens. Just 4+ million.

    Jain is a firm believer in ahimsa (the practice of nonviolence) to animals, while committing himsa (violence) to fellow human beings

    Yes, sometimes against their deluded own… starved by her own parents, and a demented pagan ideology.

    https://www.ndtv.com/hyderabad-news/13-year-old-jain-girl-dies-in-hyderabad-after-fasting-for-68-days-1471700

  261. anonymous[271] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    PC nonsense which ignores the low IQs of blacks & browns

    As compared to the lily white geniuses? Aren’t those the specimens who go around screaming hilariously how 3 (or 4) is 1… man is god… god is man? How smart do you think they are in trying to prove these illogical delusions?

    Of course, there are plenty of blacks & browns who also go around screaming… 3 (or 4) is 1… etc.!

    I agree, they got nothin’.

  262. Skeptikal says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants.”:

    So, resettle the Jews there.
    Why shoujd the Pals leave their native land, their farms, their springs, their culture, their traditions, for a piece of unimproved desert?
    The Jews can take all of that of their own with them and turn the Sinai green.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  263. anon[317] • Disclaimer says:

    yes, in the generation prior to WWI, (between the real birth of organized Zionism 1896 and today) and I agree with you just what suffering was inflicted. However a much more important question: why and how was the little bit of suffering made the subject of grand ole global propaganda scheme? The Palestinians have suffered immensely, but few know about it, 32 million Ukrainians died under Jewish led Lenin post Christian Tzarist Russia, yet very few know about that. The banksters and their privately owned, massively wealthy, politically powerful corporations wanted the every Jew they could find to venture forth on Bankster “take the oil from the Arab” programs. That goal of these programs was to mobilize immigration by propaganda, and to use the mobilization, as a weapon, to invade the Ottoman lands for the purpose of taking the oil and gas from the Arabs.. Reason for WWI was to gain rule of law and military authority control over the Ottoman Territory.. and it was the British and French banksters and their privately owned, massively wealthy, politically powerful corporations that pushed this to reality. Remember all minds were set on “taking from the Arabs their oil” before the Damn Germans and Russians could get their hands on it. Destroy the Ottoman Empire, eliminate German military and bargaining power as a nation, (though many Jewish Russian oligarch became investors in the Arab Oil), in fact get the state apparatus of Russia involved to help weaken the Germans (Germans had strong inroads to Arab oil already in place, since 1865) in order to take the Arab oil from the Arabs..

    • Replies: @bjondo
    , @Wizard of Oz
  264. Heros says:
    @jilles dykstra

    There is also the persecution of elderly women like Sivia Stohl, Ursula Haverbeck, and Monika Schaefer.

    Yes, it is always appalling to watch jews finally being cornered and forced to look at their lies in the face. They simply aren’t used to it. Usually, as they say, as the jew strikes you, he screams anti-semitism, deflects, projects, spits, kvetches, claims persecuted victimhood. When all that fails he pretends you don’t exists, continues the same lies, and contacts one form of the jewish gangster goyim hit squads or another. It could be ADL or SPLC. It could be the HR department where you work. It could be Mossad or Cube. It could be the FBI, BAT, BLM or any other US department they control. It doesn’t matter, when you think you have won, the jew merely escalates to another battle space where is collective has even more control.

    In otherwords, it is impossible for honest, trusting Christians to coexist along side these people who would blood sacrifice Christian children, then murder and defame more Christians to cover it up, and finally project their jewish guilt back onto the Christians for being “anti-semitic”.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  265. bjondo says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Relocate Yid back to Pale of Settlement (mentioned in article size of France and Spain) some 50 times size of current (but ever enlarging) Israel.

    The walls now used against Palestinians can be used to begin surrounding the PoS. Makes everyone happy except Yid who now has to live with Yid and leech off Yid. Total boycott and sanctions and isolation.

    Or

    give ‘em an old aircraft carrier. Can continue wandering forever. And making up taller tales.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  266. jsm says:
    @anon

    Just thinking out loud. Maybe this is a good thing. Maybe this is actually a strategy that can work to our advantage?

    Consider: One thing that allowed Jews to wrest control while keeping the Flyover Country kinda naive about it, is that Jews can “pass” as Whites. Flyover country rubes are just now realizing that the people in charge Are Not Like Them and Do Not Like Them. Not true for Indians. The dark skin is a dead giveway.

    Plus, stupid Rapture Bunnies think they have to “stand with Israel” to get Jesus to come back in time to save them from the grave. So, Jews get a “pass” from criticism.
    Not true of Hindu Indians. Scofield’s Bible doesn’t promise that Jesus Will Come Back Soon if dot-Indians get to move into Palestine.

    So, when Indians wrest control from Jews in America, it’s gonna be a lot harder for them to hold down the natural inclination of White people to Throw Them Out. Hindus are no real threat. After all, the British Raj, all, what, several hundred of them, managed to dominate a billion of ‘em in their own country.

    So, let the Indians take over from the Jews. Getting our country back will then become a million percent easier.

  267. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @renfro

    Since the Palestine’s ancestors were the first and constant inhabitants of Palestine -going back 9000 years….it should be the Jews who are transferred out–don’t you think.

    No. Justice ain’t got nuthin’ to do with it.

    It’s a question of what’s feasible. Egypt will never give or sell land to Israel or accommodate millions of Jewish immigrants, whereas the Palestinians, as Muslims and members of the Arab family, would surely be acceptable.

    Moreover, any such settlement would have to involve solemn and internationally backed diplomatic agreements: A treaty of perpetual peace between Israel and New Palestine, and a treaty of perpetual mutual defense between New Palestine and Egypt. In that way, the New Palestinian state would provide Egypt with hugely increased security on its Eastern border.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Skeptikal
    , @renfro
  268. escobar says:

    What is the “Jewish question” in America? Our alliance with Zionism is a symptom, not the root. And thew root, for me, is that the 2% Jews in the USA outperformed most other “groups” in achieving the American Dream of wealth. And that wealth bought them the power they now have.
    It is true that most Jews have the morals of a skunk drunk on Manishewitz. But then, those competing best against them are not far behind as embodiments of greed and deceit.
    If only “money talks” in America, fuggedaboutit. Probably too late to chase our moneylenders out of the temple. They, Jews and Christians alike, bought it. Change that, or live with it.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Wally
    , @peterAUS
  269. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Druid

    If you’re not an American Indian, the best suggestion is that YOU leave!

    No, you are either one of the many liberal dupes and fools who fail to understand the meaning of open borders, or a settler intent on usurping the place of the Europeans in the Americas.

    The Europeans came to the Americas because the Amerindians had open borders. The Amerindians were thus displaced as the owners of the land. The Euro settlers are now faced by would-be usurpers, the settlers yelping about “white privilege” with the backing of a treasonous elite and a cretinous so-called academic establishment.

    If the Euro-Americans do not fight back ruthlessly, kicking out disruptive non-assimilating inmmigrants, booting the traitors from political office, the bureaucracy and the educational/brainwashing system, while getting on an reproducing themselves, then they will be finished too.

    But I’m going nowhere voluntarily. And if you wanna make something of it, I’ll get a gun, if necessary.

  270. bjondo says:
    @anon

    The Palestinians have suffered immensely, but few know about it, 32 million Ukrainians died under Jewish led Lenin post Christian Tzarist Russia, yet very few know about that.

    Most groups of people, maybe all, have suffered. Maybe all have suffered more than Jew (certainly Palestinians, Iraqis have). And maybe in any one year greater suffering than Jew in 2500 years to include the fictional suffering. Certainly Indians, Blacks, Asians, poor whites. But only Jew whines, whines, whines, about it. Others take it as part of life and struggle on. And only Jew seeks revenge for Jew suffering in their own fictional stories.

  271. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    Ridiculous.

    Yeah, well the Devil would be in the details, no doubt. But there’s a lot of plus in it for the Egyptians. At present, Sinai is an open invitation to Israeli expansion. Filled with Palestinian Arabs cultivating the desert using, as you point out,* Israeli technology, Sinai would contribute to both the territorial and food security of Egypt.

    ———
    * It’s interesting to look at the satellite image of the Israel Egypt border. The way intensive farming stops at the Israeli border, indicates the potential of Sinai.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  272. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Skeptikal

    “The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants.”:

    So, resettle the Jews there.
    Why shoujd the Pals leave their native land

    Because the alternative you suggest won’t work for the reasons I state at #274.

    • Replies: @Heros
  273. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @bjondo

    Relocate Yid back to Pale of Settlement (mentioned in article size of France and Spain) some 50 times size of current (but ever enlarging) Israel.

    Fine with me, but what do the Lithuanians, the Poles, and the NovoRossiyans have to say about that? Niet, I should think. Likewise, probably the Jews. During WW2, the Lithuanians, were particularly keen about murdering Jews, according to Solzhenitsyn.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    , @bjondo
  274. annamaria says:
    @CanSpeccy

    You carefully avoided the most important line, “the Palestinian’s ancestors were the first and constant inhabitants of Palestine going back 9000 years.”

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  275. Heros says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Can’t you get a thick jew lie into your brain Skeptikal! The jews don’t want to be given desert when they can ritually sacrifice families before stealing their land. It is so much more “fulfilling”. Anyone who thinks Jews should have to give back land they have murdered to steal, is clearly and anti-semite and a racist!

  276. annamaria says:
    @escobar

    You are correct: http://www.voltairenet.org/article202215.html
    “This situation may be described as a confrontation between, on the one hand, a transnational ruling class and, on the other, the governments responsible to their people.”

  277. Skeptikal says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “Egypt will never give or sell land to Israel or accommodate millions of Jewish immigrants, whereas the Palestinians, as Muslims and members of the Arab family, would surely be acceptable.”

    It jsut goes to show how nice the Pals were to the Jews in the first place.

    I say: Israel has to give up something very valuable in order for such a deal to take place.
    Or even be considered.
    It is Israel that has to be controlled via a web of treaties and agreements, not the Pals. And, The Zionist will keep their fingers crossed behind their backs as they sign anything!!

    Zion must define its borders in perpetuity.
    Zion must depart from the Golan.
    Zion must provide complete documentation of its nuclear facilities and warheads.
    Zion must bear the cost of resettlement of Palestinians, plus must purchase from Palestinians every hectare that has been stolen, every house the has been bulldozed, since 1967.

    Now, let’s make a deal!
    Uh huh.
    The Israelis will once again expect the rest of the world to pay for what they want.
    Ain’t gonna happen!

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  278. Skeptikal says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Send the Jews back to their countries of origin.
    russians go back to Russia.
    Americans go back to America.
    Germans go back to Germany.
    Etc.
    Only problem is that no one will want them.

    There is only one solution. It is the one-state solution.

  279. annamaria says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “The way intensive farming stops at the Israeli border…”
    – Have you heard about Israeli’s thievery of water resources? http://www.palestinechronicle.com/whitewashing-apartheid-israels-dirty-water/
    “Reuters report from 2009: “Amnesty says Israel curbing water to Palestinians.” Citing Amnesty International’s calculation that per capita water consumption in Israel was four times higher than in the Palestinian territories.”

    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180320-israel-cuts-fresh-water-supplies-to-gaza/

    “All of the irrigation wells used by farmers near the Gaza border have collapsed due to Israel taking the underground water sources through their deep wells.”

    https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2010/0322/World-Water-Day-Thirsty-Gaza-residents-battle-salt-sewage

    “The pollution, the poor wastewater treatment, the lack of pipes and cement for repairs – all of this is more a result of the blockade than anything else.”

    The theocratic Jewish state is a criminal state through and through.
    The Israelis supremacists are only sensitive to the needs of “moderate” terrorists of ISIS and White Helmets and the needs of Ukrainian neo-nazi.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @CanSpeccy
  280. AaronB says:
    @peterAUS

    You are right about the us vs them thing. I my self argued on another thread that group conflict seems to be the human norm, whether we like it or not.

    I guess what I am trying to say is that group identity has to have a cultural and religious – a metaphysical – component to really be successful and to be strong and lasting.

    The group that lacks that metaphysical glue will fail to see itself as an “us” and will simply surrender to the “them” or join them.

    The right wing attempt to base white group identity on HBD, which is pure materialism, had never been tried before in history and will fail, it seems to me.

    All groups who have been successful at maintaining group identity, Jews, Japanese, Muslims, have a strong metaphysical element solidifying group identity.

    It is always – ethny + religion + culture, or ethny + metaphysical glue.

    The HBD attempt to base it solely on ethny does not seem like it will work.

    The HBD people look at Jews and Japanese with envy and wonder why they can’t have similar ethnic solidarity – being materialists, they are blind to the metaphysical glue which holds everything together.

    If law and order break down in the US, whites who are pure materialists will likely surrender to or join and blend with other groups who are held together by metaphysical glue – they won’t fight based on their race or skin color. Race isn’t enough of a Platonic Idea.

    So nothing can be done until materialism ends. It is literally the main thing standing between a recovery – and all the attempts to make recovery based on materialist systems will just fail.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @peterAUS
  281. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    Ron, I think your stepping stones to this point are likely mostly false. Starting with your error of using different methodologies to estimate the number of Jews at Harvard and the number of Jews who academically deserved to be there.

    Strangely you even try to prove some sort of Jewish ideological hegemony by pointing to all of the Jewish dissenters. This is self defeating.

    Nonetheless I do think there is some value in the second half of this article but that you way over-exaggerate and complicate the case.

    Of course if a minority really really cares about one thing that no-one else much cares about, then the minority will likely get their way. I liked the Orange Club chocolate bars at school. Most other people didn’t, so on the day they were handed out I got a lot of them.

    The following does not dismiss your argument. It is just a question. If there’s been a Jewish Pravda over America for a hundred years, what time would you turn the political clock back to?

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  282. bjondo says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Good point.

    No one wants them. Ugly souls just ain’t wanted.

    Leaves the wandering aircraft carrier.

  283. APilgrim says:

    The choice of the word ‘Holocaust’, (A Burnt Offering to God) universally used by Ashkenazim to describe Hitler’s mass execution of his Jewish kinsmen, remains ironic. So from September 8, 70 AD until June 7, 1967 the Jews were excluded from Jerusalem.

    1896 years banishment and immolation of millions, was quite a price to pay, for Ashkenazim migration to Jerusalem.

    Martin Luther would have been shocked, perhaps dazzled, at the prospect.

    • Replies: @Wally
  284. @AaronB

    Americans and Australians are a mixture of various European nationalities, to begin with.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  285. Wally says:
    @annamaria

    said:
    “The Israelis supremacists are only sensitive to the needs of “moderate” terrorists of ISIS and White Helmets and the needs of Ukrainian neo-nazi.”

    Please tell us what you find so bad about “Ukrainian neo-nazi.”
    We certainly know that the original ‘Nazis’ did not do what has been alleged about them.

    So why do you have a bizarre fetish for “neo-Nazis”?

    By continually using that silly, loaded phrase, all you’re doing is perpetuating lies, which play right into the hands of the horrific Zionists.

    Thanks.

  286. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Anon

    They could not have done it had the Sermon on the Mount had as many readers as “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?”

    Actually, the Sermon on the Mount is more deadly than any guide to worldly fame and fortune.

    The globalists take as the message from the Mount that white people should move over and make way for the Third World. It’s basically bullshit, off-yourself to make way for a settler, morality.

    And it’s not what Jesus meant, if one goes by the version in St. Matthew where Jesus speaks disparagingly of gentiles.

    No, the SOTM, was a message to Jews, specifically a call to avoid inter-family and inter-tribal strife. Which makes sense. if you forgive a brother or a neighbor when he has wronged you, he knows he owes you one, and unless he’s a psychopath, he will return the favor one day.

    On the other hand, if you play tit-for-tat in every encounter with those you must deal every day, you will for ever be embroiled in conflict.

    The European nations will not survive without ridding themselves of their toxic snowflake morality. That means ridding themselves of the entire bureaucratic-brainwashing machine known as the education system, and the corporate monopoly media, the latter representing a total denial free speech.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  287. Tyrion 2 says: • Website
    @Tyrion 2

    Also, as per your point about never having come into contact with anti-Semitism in real life. I almost one hundred percent agree. I’ve seen cartoonish versions of it twice.

    Once, understandably, in the West Bank where I was subject to a long but strangely friendly diatribe about how Jews destroyed the Roman Empire and created the Black Death and so on.

    The other was at a dissident right event where no one would know I was Jewish so it wasn’t personal and, to be fair, it was more comical than threatening.

    The only thing is that it clearly does exist in deranged form. If only on the comment sections that you (genuinely) kindly host.

    What I find most annoying about this Pravda series is that it is clear that Western media does lie a lot.

    Or, at least, the journalists don’t know any better.

    My issue though is that the vast majority of these falsehoods have nothing to do with Jews so you don’t seem to care about them. We live in a weird soft 1984 (perhaps even since 1984) and you obsess over 1% of the horrifying picture.

    The conspiratorial part of my mind feels that this is a deliberate dystopian ploy of distraction. Nonetheless, by now, it is quite clear that you’re perfectly earnest in your endeavours.

    Another question, apologies for its obtuseness, at what point does a small counter-balance end up falling off the deep end when shuffling to the extremes to make up for the much greater weight on the other side?

  288. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @annamaria

    Have you heard about Israeli’s thievery of water resources?

    Yes, but don’t worry about the water. Sinai has sunshine, which means a virtually limitless supply of pure water by solar-powered desalination of sea water.

    Desalination works very well with solar power. Surplus power is used to pump water to mountain reservoirs, from which, during hours of darkness, it flows under pressure through membrane filters to provide the water to irrigate the desert.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
    , @renfro
    , @renfro
  289. Wally says:
    @escobar

    said:
    “And thew root, for me, is that the 2% Jews in the USA outperformed most other “groups” in achieving the American Dream of wealth. And that wealth bought them the power they now have.”

    Except that Jew are much more numerous than “2%”
    .
    Most Jews are not ‘religious’ so they do not say they are Jews in census questions about religion. They consider themselves Jews nonetheless. They want you to think they are so few & helpless victims when in fact they create massive resentment towards themselves by their owns actions.

    According to Jewish law Jews are to avoid being counted.
    “To actually count Jews directly is forbidden (Talmud, Yoma 22b), as the prophet says: “And the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which shall neither be measured nor counted.”

    http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/896203/jewish/Laws-of-Counting-Jews.htmand:

    ‘Why is it forbidden to count Jews?’

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/18472

    “This opening verse of our Biblical portion teaches that it is forbidden to take a number count of the Israelites, a census activity which Jewish organizations are constantly involved in doing. This prohibition is reinforced by the prophet Hosea (chapter 2), when he declares: “The number of the children of Israel shall be as the sands of the sea, which cannot be numbered and cannot be counted…” And historically even King David learned the bitter lesson of the power of this command, when- against the will of his Chief Commander Joab – he ordered a census, and the Israelites suffered a plague (II Samuel, 24).”

    - “This prohibition is reinforced by the prophet Hosea (chapter 2), when he declares: “The number of the children of Israel shall be as the sands of the sea, which cannot be numbered and cannot be counted…”

    - “I have seen all the (Jewish?) works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and a striving after wind. That which is crooked cannot be made straight, and that which is wanting cannot be numbered….” Book of Ecclesiaste

    “We reached the [Balfour] Declaration not by miracles, but through persistent propaganda, through unceasing demonstration of the life force of our people. We told the responsible authorities: We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not. You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.”
    - World Zionist leader [1st President of Israël] Chaim Weizmann, speech in Jerusalem, December 1919.

    http://www.codoh.com

  290. AaronB says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    All groups are heavily blended mixes.

    A German or an Englishman is a heavily blended ethnic mix held together by a metaphysical glue – once the metaphysical glue vanishes, then people start talking about how there is no such thing as a German, anyone can be a German just by living on the geographic area known as Germany, et, etc.

    And those people are quite right. That is why materialism is the main thing holding things back.

    • Replies: @Art
  291. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Skeptikal

    Now, let’s make a deal!
    Uh huh.
    The Israelis will once again expect the rest of the world to pay for what they want.
    Ain’t gonna happen!

    Maybe not. But your morality is irrelevant to the question of what will happen. The reality, whatever that turns out to be, will be morality free.

    Morality does not exist in the international realm. (That is why multi-culti doesn’t work, because it purports to integrate national groups that do not recognize one another as deserving the moral rights of their co-religionists, co-nationalists, or co-racialists. )

    All that matters, or should matter, to the participants in any solution to any international problem is what works and what achieves the aims of the participants at minimal cost in blood and treasure.

    ME instability is costing the US and NATO trillions. To allow your petty and irrelevant morality to prevent a deal that eliminates a major cause of ME instability would be evidence of Western insanity.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Skeptikal
  292. Skeptikal says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “This, and the residues of that religious nonconformity, comparative economic co-operation, and social isolation, and some cultural peculiarity gave the Jewish group a special physiognomy. ”

    In The Pity of It All, it is described how assimilated Jews who *really wanted to assimilate totally* could not do so. Their origins hung like boulders arouind their necks. They were always identified as jews, not matter what they did. So, it seems like the “cultural peculiarity” is something that Germans, too, were not willing to let go of in their view of Jews. Or, the assimilated Jews were excluded from enough Gentile organizations that they had to band together (for example, from organizations for such typical upper-middle-class pursuits such as a boating club in Berlin, or a swimming club in Vienna, and other athletic pursuits) to form their own such organizations. Then of course they are back with their own kind, reinforcing their cultural traits and developing a new subculture. These Jews might have been able to totally assimilate, leaving no Jewish traces, in another generation or two, if the Bolsh Revolution and Hitler had not come along.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  293. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @escobar

    In error, I attached my comment #293 to anon’s comment on your comment that Jews could not have risen to great power in the US:

    …had the Sermon on the Mount had as many readers as “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?”

  294. AaronB says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Ok, what about Buddhism – Buddhism does not speak of Jew or gentile and yet has the same message as the Sermon On The Mount. The countries that have adopted it don’t seem to have any problem standing up for themselves.

    Interestingly, when Europeans believed in a literal Universalist version of the Sermon – not your limited tribal version – they had no problem standing up for themselves.

    Don’t get me wrong, I admit there is a paradox here – I’m just pointing it out. It seems that the more a Universalist message is accepted, the more a person, a group, a country is willing to stand up for itself, and the more a person or a country is individualist and materialist, the less he’s willing to stand up for himself.

    It’s an interesting paradox.

    Jews, as I’ve pointed out before, have a Universalist religion of total human redemption through the agency of the Jews – and are quite willing to stand up for themselves.

    I don’t fully understand these matters or pretend to have the solution, but I think we must grapple with these paradoxes.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    , @escobar
  295. Heros says:
    @Grahamsno(G64)

    This foto really reveals the fraud:

    • Replies: @bjondo
    , @Wally
  296. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB

    Don’t get me wrong, I admit there is a paradox here – I’m just pointing it out.

    I think you are wrong and that there is no paradox.

    As for Buddhists standing up for themselves, I have no real knowledge, although Buddhist Thailand is known as the center of the world’s sex tourism industry, which suggests that they have a problem of their children lying down with foreigners.

    Interestingly, when Europeans believed in a literal Universalist version of the Sermon – not your limited tribal version – they had no problem standing up for themselves.

    The Europeans were never universalists. Christianity is the application of Judaic morality to the people of an empire. The people beyond the imperial far-flung battle line are fair game for genocide or slavery.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @renfro
  297. escobar says:
    @AaronB

    Yes, Buddhists or Ethical Humanists can and should stand up for themselves. But these two don’t usually seek power. Our money-lender/rulers must be deprived of much of their power and a government “for” the people established. “Muscular Christian socialism” once hoped to do that in England. In the USA? Remember when Rev. Schuler (sp?) declared his megachurch “God’s shopping mall”? Right now we don’t have anything larger in the American mind and heart than the Self—neither God nor Nation.
    Waiting for Godot?

    • Replies: @AaronB
  298. APilgrim says:
    @CanSpeccy

    There is no ‘surplus-power’ during peak hours in the afternoon & early evening.

    Surplus Electrical Power is available at 3:00 AM, When the sun is down, & the wind is generally still. The reverse-osmosis ‘membrane filters’ are in the ocean. Most of the peak power is probably from their new natural gas fields.

    But your point is well taken. Israel has begun to recharge rivers & creeks flowing into the Sea of Galilee, with desalinated water. They are also producing massive quantities of RO water in their Southeast and Southwest boundary waters.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  299. Heros says:
    @recoveringVideoGameAddict

    Here is a Twitter thread laying out the story of how a handfull of jews in Iceland have have forced the icelanders not only to accept circumcision, but also forced them to pay for a synogogue and a Rabbi to agitate from it! All because Icelanders have been such big anti-semites throughout history.

    Circumcision is a sign of submittal to the noahide laws. Soon, there will be the chip too.

  300. AaronB says:
    @CanSpeccy

    I’m just talking about how Europe’s theologians wrote about the Sermon for centuries – as Universalist, not tribal.

    The new tribal interpretation now emerging in the right is a step in the right direction, don’t get me wrong. Its better than individualism. But it is a striking fact that during the centuries when Europe’s theologians thought the Sermon was universal Europe had enough pride to stand up for itself.

    As for Buddhism, most of Asia is Buddhist – Japan, China, Thailand, these places don’t quite go in for self hate like the West.

  301. APilgrim says:

    According to Scripture, it appears that God is often anti-Semitic, for cause.

    “Yea they sacrificed their sonnes, and their daughters vnto deuils, And shed innocent blood, euen the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whome they sacrificed vnto the idoles of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood. Thus were they defiled with their owne works: and went a whoring with their owne inuentions. Therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled against his people: insomuch that he abhorred his owne inheritance. And he gaue them into the hand of the heathen: and they that hated them, ruled ouer them. Their enemies also oppressed them: and they were brought into subiection vnder their hand. Many times did he deliuer them: but they prouoked him with their counsell, and were brought low for their iniquitie.”

    Bible, 1611 KJV Authorized Version, Psalms, Chapter 106, Verses 37- 43: https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611_Psalms-Chapter-106/

  302. AaronB says:
    @escobar

    As long as you have society you’ll have rulers, and they’ll mostly be bad. I don’t think it’s worth worrying about too much.

  303. bjondo says:
    @Heros

    Bottom 3, pics of potato sheds?

  304. annamaria says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “Morality does not exist in the international realm.”
    – Thank you for clarification. Then what is the purpose of Holocaust Museums? The Anne Frank diary? The long-term extortion by Jews the reparations from destroyed Germany?

    The whole zionist project is built on the notions of “eternal victimhood,” “incomparable sufferings,” and “superior morality.” Your statement nicely conforms with the definition of Jews “being cheaters, because of their spirit of usury.”

    CanSpeccy writes, “To allow your petty and irrelevant morality to prevent a deal that eliminates a major cause of ME instability would be evidence of Western insanity.” — Would not the (invented) “final solution” become a great method of eliminating a “major cause of instability” in Germany?

    The zionist project (an imitation of the German ideology of Romantic Nationalism) has become an abomination from the perspective of the best in western civilization. The imitation has become an ugly farce.
    As for the “multi-culti” mess in Europe, it is rather dishonest to pretend that Lybia, Iraq, and Syria were not mentioned in Oded Yinon plan for Eretz Israel. The idiot ziocons that had produced PNAC and then performed a careful weeding out the competent specialists in the Middle East in the US government, before the illegal interventions by the US in the ME, should be named one by one in relation to the refugee/migrant crisis in EU.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  305. renfro says:
    @CanSpeccy

    No. Justice ain’t got nuthin’ to do with it.

    History says …’no justice, no peace.’

    Whats feasible and also doable is move all Jew settlers off Palestine land back to Israel within its original boarders awarded by UN Res 181.
    Then the majority of the world would be satisfied….US Arab relations would be repaired, International Law would be upheld, justice would be done.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    , @Anonymous
  306. renfro says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Judaic morality

    There is no such thing as Judaic morality.
    Find me one example of Judaic morality in practice.

  307. Skeptikal says:
    @CanSpeccy

    “To allow your petty and irrelevant morality to prevent a deal”

    My morality? WTF are you talking about?
    But if my morality had any power to “prevent” anything—the notion is too absurd for me to credit the sanity of the writer—you can be darn sure it would prevent such an injustice to the Pals as you represent.

    Speaking of “morality,” perhaps it is just and moral that the ME instability is costing the US and NATO millions. They started most of it. With the creation of Israel. The invasion of Iraq. The undermining of Lyria. The destruction of Libya. Duh.

    What is totally unjust and immoral is to calculate the “cost” of ME instabilitly in terms of $$$ cost to the US and NATO. Creepy. Oh, I guess that must be my “petty” morality.

    Of course all that we write here is “irrelevant.”

    Except, sound like CanSpeccy, however, imagines that the world is listening to him!!!
    If the Sinai deal goes through, we’ll know that he was right!!!

  308. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @APilgrim

    There is no ‘surplus-power’ during peak hours in the afternoon & early evening.

    The thing is, if you are building what is purely a solar system to power desalination, you would balance the solar collecting area to the size of the desalination plant, such that the plant operated 24/7. Thus it would either draw power from the solar array, or when solar power is not available, it would be driven by pressurized water from an elevated reservoir, where water is pumped when solar power is available. But those are min0r technical points.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  309. Wally says:
    @Heros

    Well done.

    German News Magazine and Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Museum Caught Faking Photo and Film Captions / Gas Van Film and Photo Fraud:

    http://codoh.com/library/document/3276

    and: http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DT/gcturen.html

    U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum displays standard German air-raid shelter door, describing it as the door to a gas chamber at Majdanek

    [MORE]

  310. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB

    But it is a striking fact that during the centuries when Europe’s theologians thought the Sermon was universal Europe had enough pride to stand up for itself.

    If they thought that, I’d like to know what they thought of Christian slavers, and the highly respectable Christians, like the family of UK Prime Minister, William Gladstone, who made fortunes as drivers of slaves in the Caribbean, or who traded in commodities produced, as some still are today, with slave labor, e.g., cocoa.

    As for Buddhism, most of Asia is Buddhist – Japan, China, Thailand, these places don’t quite go in for self hate like the West.

    That’s true but nothing to do with the religion. It is simply that they have not yet been adequately multicultied by a treasonous elite. Some have, though, for example Singapore, which is mainly Buddhist and where there is a horrible trade in child sex and trafficked women, and where the fertility rate is even lower than the pathetic suicidal European rates.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  311. bjondo says:
    @AaronB

    As for Buddhism, most of Asia is Buddhist – Japan, China, Thailand, these places don’t quite go in for self hate like the West.

    Give ‘em western Jew, they will hate themselves and you.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  312. anarchyst says:
    @jilles dykstra

    There will ALWAYS be holocaust ™: “survivors”.
    The latest jewish “holocaust ™” swindle is that of the “holocaust ™ transference syndrome” where (only) jewish “holocaust™ memories are transferred to their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and even to unrelated persons. This claim by two jewish psychiatrists is gaining traction among jewish “holocaust ™” promoters in order to “keep the dream alive” and to “keep the reparations and shekels flowing”. You see, these children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and other unrelated individuals are also seen as jewish “holocaust ™” survivors, worthy of reparations and special treatment.
    When will it end?

  313. APilgrim says:
    @CanSpeccy

    A solar voltaic array, or solar-thermal radiant field, together with a sufficient energy storage system to maintain a continuous water supply for Israel, would be enormous. About half of Egypt, or Syria would probably be large enough to keep that water pumping.

    That would be more than a few “minor technical points”. (IMHPO)

    Example: The USCG requires an 8 Day Battery Supply for offshore production platform fog-horns and beacons (flashing lights)…

  314. @Anonymous

    Who cares what Jews say or think? This shows you are the problem. We can do what we need to do to save the West. It is cucks like you who stand in the way.

  315. iffen says:
    @AaronB

    From Wiki:

    for example German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (a famous atheist) regarded self-transcendence, asceticism and the recognition of one’s connection to all as a key to ethical living

    You comment as if you think that you have some sort of cod-lock on the spiritual.

    You don’t.

    In its simplest expression, spiritualism just requires recognition of something greater than the self.

    Your vague references to materialism do not illuminate. If you think that the recognition that molecules move themselves without God’s help is the ultimate downfall of humanity, so be it.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
    , @AaronB
    , @AaronB
  316. Anonymous[249] • Disclaimer says:
    @renfro

    Excellent post.

  317. Wally says:
    @APilgrim

    said:
    “The choice of the word ‘Holocaust’, (A Burnt Offering to God) universally used by Ashkenazim to describe Hitler’s mass execution of his Jewish kinsmen, remains ironic.”

    You are way out of date. There was no ‘mass execution of Jews by Hitler’.

    If you really believe in that, then I request that you submit your proof.

    Thanks.

    A new day is coming.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  318. Wally says:
    @anarchyst

    Yep, you’ve touched upon one the prime reasons for manufacturing the ‘holocau$t’ propaganda in the first place.

    Cash & lots of if …. forever.

    The bogus ‘holocau$t’ museums are great examples of the scam.

    Tax exempt cash taken in by USHMM, aka: ‘Holocau$t’ Theme Park, for fiscal year 2016 which supports huge salaries for Jews only, which most of the remaining money goes to Jews & Zionist organizations:
    $151,826,695.00
    $151,826,695.00

    https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/042717-IRS-Form-990-FY16.pdf

    US taxpayers money to the USHMM in the 2017 budget:
    56,999,500.00

    https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/20160209-fy17-pres-budget-request.pdf

    http://www.codoh.com

  319. APilgrim says:
    @bjondo

    Nothing says ‘self-love’ like leaping into the flames. /S

    Self-immolation is an act of killing oneself as a sacrifice. The self-immolation (jauhar) of the Rajput women, during the Siege of Chittorgarh in 1568 is an example, as is Thích Quảng Đức a Vietnamese Mahayana Buddhist monk who burned himself to death at a busy Saigon road intersection on 11 June 1963.

    Self-immolation is tolerated by some elements of Mahayana Buddhism and Hinduism, and it has been practiced for many centuries, especially in India, for various reasons, including jauhar, sati, political protest, devotion, and renouncement.

  320. peterAUS says:
    @iffen

    You comment as if you think that you have some sort of cod-lock on the spiritual.

    You don’t.

    Nobody does.

    In its simplest expression, spiritualism just requires recognition of something greater than the self.

    Sounds right.
    Now, I am sure that several posters and around dozen readers would be quite happy to correct us. Several pages of………writing.
    They could even be right.
    Irrelevant, I feel, or worse, distracting.

    All what matters is finding and having something to rally Western people into something capable of resisting this…”Brasil-emulaton” we are experiencing at the moment.
    Something simple; something that can move a common man. Long lectures about metaphysics and such aren’t it.

    Not easy, of course.
    Fear not, though. There is a backup plan.
    Here it is: West simply weakens enough NOT to be able to interfere when some other peoples make their moves.

    Like…just don’t send US military there and all will be O.K.

    And, then, just watch and learn. Simple and efficient.

    • Replies: @iffen
  321. AaronB says:
    @iffen

    I’m not talking about specific spiritual beliefs. Just a realm you can’t see with your senses.

    If you don’t believe in that, I don’t think you can have a group identity.

    That’s just my take. To each their own.

    • Replies: @iffen
  322. APilgrim says:
    @Wally

    Reasonable persons may request evidence, explanation and/or argument. ‘Proof’ is an unattainable standard for Holocaust Deniers. There are none so blind as those who will not see. I don’t personally attach more significance to German atrocities against Ashkenazim than the Turkish slaughter of Armenians, or the genocides of the USSR, ChiCOMs, Cambodia, and/or Rwanda.

    Most of the ‘proofs’ I have written, relate to advanced mathematics, physics & engineering.

    I doubt that you could fathom such matters.

    • Replies: @Wally
  323. AaronB says:
    @iffen

    Also wanna say a few words about “vagueness” because I got that before from GR and others.

    Spiritual things are supposed to be vague – if you are unwilling to accept vagueness then you close yourself off to the spiritual. Precise, clearly defined spirituality is an oxymoron.

    In fact, the modern world began when Descartes said no more vagueness and only clear precise ideas. Turns out there aren’t too many of those.

    Your choice is either modernity – with its clear ideas, or spirituality, which is vague – it’s fine if you choose modernity and clarity but then don’t imagine you are criticizing spirituality by saying it us vague. By saying that you are merely confirming that you have chosen modernity and closed yourself off to the spiritual – which is so vague it has been called a Mystery.

    So again – not criticizing you for choosing modernity and being anti vagueness. That’s up to you.

    Just don’t mix categories. It would be like me wanting a vague math, or vague science.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  324. Anne Lid says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Search engines bring up nothing on this. How do you know that they were Hungarians, please?

  325. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @annamaria

    You carefully avoided the most important line, “the Palestinian’s ancestors were the first and constant inhabitants of Palestine going back 9000 years.”

    Of course I did not avoid it. I addressed it directly.

    No. Justice ain’t got nuthin’ to do with it.

    So let me repeat: Justice ain’t got nuthin’ to do with it.

    Palestine was obtained by conquest. There is no question of morality or justice where nations engage in violence, rapine and theft. If the Palestinians want Palestine back, they will have to take it by force, and no one is going risk being nuked by Israel by helping them.

  326. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @annamaria

    “Morality does not exist in the international realm.”
    – Thank you for clarification. Then what is the purpose of Holocaust Museums? The Anne Frank diary? The long-term extortion by Jews the reparations from destroyed Germany?

    It’s bullshit, of course. Propaganda, if you want a polite word. If the purveyors of propaganda can get away with the purveying and the targets of the propaganda respond as intended, then the propaganda will go on. It’s a continuation of war by other means. Put a stop to it if you can.

  327. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @renfro

    Whats feasible and also doable is move all Jew settlers off Palestine land back to Israel within its original boarders awarded by UN Res 181.

    I doubt it’s feasible or doable, else it would already have been done. But it’s fine with me, it it is done.

  328. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @renfro

    There is no such thing as Judaic morality.

    I am no expert, but the ten commandments are, I believe, of jewish origin and they are certainly moral commands. Whether anyone pays any attention to them is another matter.

    • Replies: @Felix-Culpa
  329. Bill says:
    @attilathehen

    If Jews own the porn industry (which they don’t), why don’t they name the Jews? The Western cuck is incapable of doing anything. The cuck’s mind is so twisted by “universal church” and “universal brotherhood,” he can’t make a statement about anything. This “blame the Jews” schtick has to end. It is time to deal squarely with the problems in the West. The cucks are going to have be dragged kicking and screaming into the battle.

    The circularity in this “argument” is a wonder to behold. Westerners’ failure to name the Jew is why they must not name the Jew.

    Just what would it look like for Westerners to de-cuckify and enter the battle? Well, every other ethnocentric, xenophobic, religious bigot has endless stories of how they are victimized by other groups and how any wrong act their group committed was merely understandable or even justified revenge for these victimizations. You might think that telling, hearing, and believing these stories serves some, you know, function in motivating collective action.

  330. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB

    But concerning the self hate of the West, it has nothing to do with Christian ideals, because the West today is not Christian.

    Christianity has lost all real authority and is now represented by such as the man from MI6, aka the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the advocate of white genocide, Pope Gigolo.

    Christianity has lost all force due to the rise of democracy, which places power without responsibility in the hands of the plutocracy, which buys the elections and bribes the holders of office. Democracy means a hidden Money Power rules, seeking relentlessly to make as much money as possible while, as Gore Vidal noted, causing as much damage as possible to as many people as possible.

    Hence the Treason Party that rules throughout the European nations, headed by get-rich opportunists such as the Clintons, Tony Blair ad many others. If some supposedly Buddhist and democratic nations have so far resisted national self-destruction it is likely because a political aristocracy has so far managed to restrain the natural tendency of democracies to self destruct through the kinds of insanity evident in the US today.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @iffen
  331. notanon says:

    if church-inspired european outbreeding led to the gradual replacement of the default human concentric familial morality (me against my brother, me and my brother against my cousin etc) with an evolved more universalist guilt based morality then…

    Jews manipulating white guilt could be seen as an evolved adaptation to the white environment i.e. Jews are adapted to white people.

  332. AaronB says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Sounds like a reasonable analysis. That’s why I don’t care so much about political systems. They come, they go, they’re always fucked up in one way or another.

    I figure the current system will collapse sooner or later, to be replaced by something better in some ways and worse in others.

    I can’t imagine the point of life is to be concerned with politics.

    Jews are on top now, tomorrow it’ll be someone else. It always is.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  333. notanon says:
    @renfro

    it’s familial morality – a set of rules for *within* the in-group which don’t apply to out-groups (unless fear of retaliation applies)

    this is default human morality – Jews aren’t the outlier, Euros are

  334. iffen says:
    @peterAUS

    All what matters is finding and having something to rally Western people into something capable of resisting this…”Brasil-emulaton” we are experiencing at the moment.
    Something simple; something that can move a common man. Long lectures about metaphysics and such aren’t it.

    We just need to double down.

    • Agree: AaronB
  335. notanon says:

    Eventually, these two combined trends may take a complex and possibly very mixed historical record and transform it into a simple morality-play, with innocent Jews tremendously injured by vicious Jew-haters.

    the mechanism you describe could be seen as an adaptation to prevent assimilation

  336. Art says:
    @AaronB

    That is why materialism is the main thing holding things back.

    Holding what things back?

    Materialism brings food, shelter, medicine – and longer safer lives.

    Christian philosophy brings hope, and with it the Western quest for discovery, which leads to better lives.

    Billions have spoken, clearly, the East wants what the West has produced.

    Go off and contemplate your metaphysical wonders – become a monk and beg from the hopeful and materialistic.

    Think Peace — Be Idealistic — Art

    p.s. Metaphysics – abstract theory or talk with no basis in reality.

    p.s. Isn’t the Talmud metaphysical?

    • Replies: @AaronB
  337. Skeptikal says:
    @anarchyst

    “You see, these children, grandchildren, great grandchildren and other unrelated individuals are also seen as jewish “holocaust ™” survivors, worthy of reparations and special treatment.”

    This is true. They call themselves “second generation” and posit that their own life experiences have been irremediably influenced by their parents’ (or, now, grandparents”) experiences as Holocaust survivors. I don’t discredit the idea that parents’ and grandparents’ experiences do have an effect on the general psychology of their children and grandchildren, because parents’ personalities ahve a lot to do with shaping their children’s personalities.

    What bothers me is that, again, many, many groups and individuals have great suffering in their antecedents’ lives, and they must somehow integrate the issues this has raised for them. But AFAIK they don’t make this fact of life a central portion of their individual *and group* identity.

    But the Jews can’t stop the navel gazing and guilt tripping. In fact, guilt tripping is a major facet of the Jewsih personality, also for Jews who never came near the camps. That is why, for many Jews, just being a member of a Jewish family—having a Jewish mother—is a major psychological burden, and the subject of numerous works of literature, films, etc.

    Fer chrissakes, get over yourselves! And acknowledge that others have suffered and also bear scars.
    Such as, say, the Palestinians. It is, in fact, a miracle that the whole Palestinian people have not gone stark raving mad, living as they do in a world where their basic experience of that world is denied, distorted, invalidated, in favor of the world view of their torturers, and they are punished for responding rationally to the cruelty to which they are subjected daily. This is a madness machine, a machine for generating madness. Another invention of those wily, clever Jews.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
    , @Skeptikal
  338. @RobinG

    Yeah – I loved it when it came out. Sure showed the ADL for who they were.

  339. AaronB says:
    @Art

    Sounds reasonable.

    I think its cool if you’re into materialism. If it makes you happy, do it. You do you.

    • Replies: @Art
  340. Zumbuddi says:
    @Skeptikal

    Extraordinary comment.
    Kudos.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  341. Dear Ron,

    Great work on exposing the ‘Cabal’ .. this might be of interest ..

    https://www.amazon.com/Dope-Inc-Drove-Henry-Kissinger/dp/0943235022

    • Replies: @Faraway
  342. renfro says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Yes, but don’t worry about the water. Sinai has sunshine, which means a virtually limitless supply of pure water by solar-powered desalination of sea water.

    Desalination has a huge down side….but that doesnt worry the Jew Israelis because they are very short term thinkers.
    The salt extracted in the process is returned to the water source along with some chemicals used in the process—-adding back more salt than is natural in the water—-this over time will poison marine life , create red tides and make desalination from the same source harder and more expensive.

    But you ignored her question about Israel theft of Palestine water resources. So lets set the record straight.

    From National Geographic

    http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2010/04/parting-the-waters/belt-text/2

    [MORE]

    “Since occupying the West Bank in 1967, Israel has built dozens of settlements in the Jordan Valley, in addition to the 120 or so elsewhere in the West Bank. The settlers’ water is provided by Mekorot, Israel’s national water authority, which has drilled 42 deep wells in the West Bank, mainly to supply Israeli cities. (According to a 2009 World Bank report, Israelis use four times as much water per capita as Palestinians, much of it for agriculture.

    *the west bank is actually legally Palestine territory, Israel confiscated it because its 3 huge water aquifers which were the main source of water .

    In contrast, West Bank Palestinians, under Israeli military rule, have been largely prevented from digging deep wells of their own, limiting their water access to shallow wells, natural springs, and rainfall that evaporates quickly in the dry desert air. When these sources run dry in the summer, Palestinians have no choice but to purchase water from Israel for about a dollar a cubic yard—in effect buying back the water that’s been taken out from under them by Mekorot’s pumps, which also lower the water table and affect Palestinian springs and wells.
    As Bromberg and I followed the Auja spring east, we passed a complex of pumps and pipes behind a barbed-wire fence—a Mekorot well, drilled 2,000 feet deep to tap the aquifer. “Blue and white pipes,” Bromberg said. “This is what water theft looks like in this part of the world.”
    In the past five decades the Jordan has lost more than 90 percent of its normal flow. Upstream, at the Sea of Galilee, the river’s fresh waters are diverted via Israel’s National Water Carrier to the cities and farms of Israel, while dams built by Jordan and Syria claim a share of the river’s tributaries, mostly for agriculture. So today the lower Jordan is practically devoid of clean water, bearing instead a toxic brew of saline water and liquid waste that ranges from raw sewage to agricultural runoff, fed into the river’s vein like some murky infusion of tainted blood.
    When I returned to Auja in early May, its spring had been reduced to a trickle, leaving the village as dry as a fistful of talcum powder. The fields around it lay empty and exhausted, while on Auja’s one plot of flat ground, boys were playing soccer amid a swirling dust cloud they were kicking up, chasing an old leather ball worn to the consistency of flannel.
    I stopped by the home of an elderly farmer named Muhammad Salama. “We haven’t had running water in my house for five weeks,” Salama said. “So now I have to buy a tank of water every day from Mekorot to supply my family and to water my sheep, goats, and horses.” He also has to buy feed for his animals because there is no water to irrigate crops. To meet these costs he is selling off his livestock, and his sons have taken jobs at an Israeli settlement, tending the tomatoes, melons, and other crops irrigated from the aquifer that is off-limits to Palestinian farmers. “What can we do?” he asked, pouring me a glass of Mekorot water from a plastic bottle. “It’s not fair, but we’re powerless to do anything about it.”
    It was a clear day, and from his front window we could see across the parched, brown valley all the way to the thin line of gray-green vegetation marking the path of the Jordan River. For a moment, its water seemed within reach. “But to get there I’d have to jump an electric fence, cross a minefield, and fight the Israeli army,” Salama said. ”
    In the West Bank at an average sustainable rate, the amount of renewable shared freshwater available throughout the entire Jordan Valley is roughly 2700 million cubic metres per year, out of which 1400 million cubic metres per year comes from groundwater and 1300 million cubic metres per year from surface water.[15] However, only a fraction of this can be used by Palestinians in the West Bank.
    Israel has denied Palestinians access to the entire Lower Jordan River since 1967. After the start of Israel’s military occupation in 1967, Israel declared the West Bank land adjacent to the Jordan River a closed military zone, to which only Israeli settler farmers have been permitted access.[16] Groundwater resources include two main aquifers: The highly productive mountain aquifer that slopes towards the more rainy West, and the less productive Eastern aquifer located under the drier part of the West Bank. Palestinians are not allowed to drill wells into the mountain aquifer. Most of its water thus flows underground towards the slopes of the hills and into Israeli territory. According to different estimates, between 80 and 85% of groundwater in the West Bank is used either by Israeli settlers or flows into Israel.
    After the assault on Gaza in 2008-09 the World Bank reported the destruction of the water and sanitation infrastructure in the Gaza Strip. Almost all sewage and water pumps were out of operation due to a lack of electricity and fuel. Spare parts and other maintenance supplies were in urgent need to be replenished. This situation resulted in a serious shortage of water and sewage overflows in urban areas, posing a threat to public health.
    According to a 2009 report by Amnesty International, some 180,000-200,000 Palestinians living in rural communities have no access to running water and “the Israeli army often prevents them from even collecting rainwater.
    The 450,000 settlers use as much or more water than the 2.3 million Palestinians. Many Palestinians have to buy water, of often dubious quality, from tanker trucks at very high prices. Water tankers are forced to take long detours to avoid Israeli military checkpoints and roads which are out of bounds to Palestinians, resulting in steep increases in the price of water. According to Amnesty International, the Israeli army also destroys rainwater harvesting cisterns and confiscates water trucks.
    Gaza has a well designed Master Plan for water and sanitation, but less than 2% of the investment program has been implemented. The Plan provided for an integrated production and conveyance system, and a major expansion of wastewater treatment capacity, including three new plants. It
    has proved impossible to implement the Plan under emergency closure conditions. By November
    2008, with the deterioration in the political and security situation, less than 2% of the investment
    program was being implemented. Even small relief projects had to be abandoned across the
    board, due to Israel’s occupation blocked imports of materials,
    while hardly any international contractor is prepared to work in Gaza. All conditions worsened with the December 2008/January 2009 Israeli military offensive on Gaza.

  343. renfro says:
    @CanSpeccy

    And in case you didnt get it I will repeat it from yet another source. Anyone who doesn’t understand that the Jews are genociding the Palestines is ignorant of all the ways they deny Palestine’s any chance of healthy lives or lives at all. They kill them with bullets, bombs, with holding water , food, medicine.
    I look forward to the day the Arabs, and indeed the world, dances on Israel’s grave.

    From the World Bank

    http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWESTBANKGAZA/Resources/WaterRestrictionsReportJuly2009.pdf

    ‘Palestinians have access to one fifth of the resources of the Mountain Aquifer. Palestinians
    abstract about 20% of the “estimated the West Bank , Israel abstracts the balance, and in addition overdraws without JWC approval on the “estimated potential” by more than 50%, up to 1.8 times its share under Oslo. Over-extraction by deep wells combined with reduced recharge has created risks for the aquifers and a decline in water available to Palestinians through shallower wells. (Chapter 1)

    Water withdrawals per head of the Palestinian population have been declining, and there are real water shortages. Palestinian abstractions have actually declined over the last ten years, under the combined effect of dropping water tables and restricted drilling, deepening and rehabilitation of wells. Water withdrawals per capita for Palestinians in the West Bank are about one quarter of those available to Israelis, and have declined over the last decade. By regional standards, Palestinians have the lowest access to fresh water resources.’

    • Agree: Cloak And Dagger, L.K
  344. @anon

    It would be useful, if you are purporting to provide facts as well as emotion, to give us a few dates and quotes. “Arab oil”, “damned Arabs” e.g. After all memory tells me that Iranian oil was pre WW1 and Saudi Arabian oil only about 30 years later. When did the Germans start using lots of oil? When was it made the main fuel for its Kriegsmarine?

  345. Seraphim says:
    @attilathehen

    So you are an adept of coprophagia. No wonder, ‘Shit eater’ is an idiomatic expression for liar. No shit!

  346. Wally says:
    @APilgrim

    IOW, you obviously have no proof for your laughable & impossible ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers.’

    We’re not talking about Armenians or your other alleged “genocides”. Your attempted subject change is noted and typical of those who can’t back-up what they claim. Your dodging my challenge displays your superficiality. IOW, you’re faking it.

    It’s amazing how easy it is shoot down True Believers in the ’6M’ propaganda & religion, just ask for proof.

    You claim to be interested in “advanced mathematics, physics & engineering”.
    Which means you should be interested in the absurd & scientific impossibility of the ‘holocaust’ narrative.
    But apparently science to you only goes as far as your religion allows.

    Here is some real science for you:

    [MORE]

    The Rudolf Report / Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz

    http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html

    ‘Some Technical and Chemical Considerations about the ‘Gas Chambers’ of Auschwitz and Birkenau’
    by Master Chemist Germar Rudolf

    http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html

    Lectures on the Holocaust / Controversial Issues Cross Examined

    https://codoh.com/library/document/1196/?lang=en

    Dissecting the Holocaust—The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  347. Tom67 says:

    Mr. Unz
    Thanks a lot for your interesting article. I very much welcome your endeavour to highlight things that have gone down the memory hole. Regarding Jews and their role in the history of the 20th century I myself once stumbled on such a memory hole myself. (I am a German writer fluent in Russian and English who has published several books) You find a former comment of mine regarding your article about post war Germany and France.
    So here it is: about ten years ago I was researching a man called Louis Horch in the National Archives in Washington. Louis Horch was a Jew of German extraction who was a mid level player on Wall Street before, during and after the first world war. His speciality was currency trading which back then meant also trading in Gold and Silver. My interest in him was caused by the fact that he was financing a Russian artist about whom I was writing a biography.
    Not expecting much I found a whole file on him. This file was by investigators of the State Department who drew on a whole lot of other agencies. The gist of the matter was that he had been closely monitored during the recent war for SUPPORTING GERMANY. That might not have been that surprising by itself but in the file there were very clear signals that they had not only monitored him but all German Jewish bankers. And in fact had imprisoned several from 1917 and had also put Louis Horch under immense pressure. Some of the most prominent names came up: Kuhn&Loeb and Otto Kahn. (Kuhn&Loeb being the most important German Jewish bank and Otto Kahn the most important banker)
    I had never heard of this and found no literature on German Jewish bankers on Wall Street using their influence to lobby for Germany and keep the US out of the war. (Not to speak of financing German imports during the war a.s.o) Neither had I ever heard of immense pressure on firms like Kuhn&Loeb which were then second only to the house of Morgan.
    I didn´t find any literature on it. Nothing. Only several passages that hinted at “false” accusations that Otto Kahn had tried to prevent the US entering the first world war. To counter these “slanders” they cited his autobiography (written much later) and comments he had supposedly made during the war.
    But there were the files which I had seen with my own lying eyes! Thinking that something as important as that (the German-Jewish banking community was right behind the WASP bankers
    – Morgan – in importance) I thought that one must find traces of it in a general history. As luck would have it I found it in a book called the “the house of Morgan” by Ron Chernow.
    To sum it: there was intense competition between WASP bankers and German Jewish bankers on Wall Street. (Among them the Schiff dynasty which you mention in your article). The WASP bankers generally had the upper hand but the German-Jewish bankers (who consisted of several families from Southwest Germany who constantly intermarried) were coming up. In the First world war they indeed lobbied against US participation in the war. In 1917 they were swept up in the furor against anything German and lost most of their influence.
    Their pro German stance had been very, very bad for business and after the war they understandably did everything to sweep their previous stance under the carpet. Goldhagen and his ilk then did the rest after the second world war.
    So what to make of this surprising fact?
    First you must understand that the position of German Jews was in some ways unique in Europe. There weren´t many – about half a million – and their position in society was quite different. At least compared to East European Jews who numbered at least ten times more and who were the bulk of Europe´s Jewish population. First of all the vast majority identified themselves foremost as Germans. Albeit of Jewish extraction. Rather like Jews in the US today. Their mother tongue was German and only a minority had typically Jewish names. There was none of the jewish mysticism which you would find in the East.If they were religious at all they adhered to a “reformed” Judaism which – in its bareness and rationality – resembled main stream Protestantism. They intermarried to a degree that is completely incomprehensible if you believe todays historiography about the supposed “eternal” antisemitism of Germany. There is a very interesting book by a Texan historian
    about mixed race soldiers in the Wehrmacht “Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers
    The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Descent in the German Military
    Bryan Mark Rigg” According to this very well researched book there must have been more than a hundred thousand men of partial Jewish heritage in the Wehrmacht. Which shows the immense amount of intermarriage.
    Jews had indeed a huge head start on the rest of the German population during the industrial revolution. They already lived in cities and knew city ways when it all started and they all were literate. So they very quickly rose in all spheres which were not reserved for the aristocracy. That is industry, banking, science, law and the arts. Maybe cronyism played a part. But certainly not as big a one as has been later claimed by the Nazis.
    Jews played a huge and leading part in the German war effort. Walter Rathenau (head of the German war economy) comes to mind or Fritz Haber who was instrumental in the German use of poison gas. Finally it is very doubtful that Jews were under represented in front troups. There is the famous “Judenzählung” (counting of Jews among front line troups) in 1916. The results were only published after the war and did indeed point to an under representation. But there is ample reason to doubt the soundness of these findings.
    First of all because Jews were classified according to religion, then because the baseline was to high (number of assumed Jews vs. real number of Jews in Germany) and then also because Jews were overrepresented in areas that were excempted from the draft like Doctors.
    There´s lot´s of evidence that German Jews deeply identified with Germany. It is certainly a fact that they were for the most part rather conservative. You might counter that with some prominent Socialists like Rosa Luxemburg. But take a closer look and you find that she and most of the others were actually Jews from the East.
    John Spallek the greatest expert on the German Jewish emigration during the Third Reich – who was tasked by Helmut Kohl to repatriate the literary estates of Germans (mostly Jews) – told me that most of Jewish exiles were German patriots who would have gladly worked under Hitler.

    Sorry, that was a very long diversion. But I think one needs to keep the above facts in mind if one wants to understand why the German-Jewish elite supported Germany in the first world war. THEY IDENTIFIED AS GERMANS. It is a fact that they tried to make forget after the war. Actually just like non Jewish German-Americans

    A second consideration was the fact that they hated Russia. One shouldn´t belittle the progroms in Russia. Compared to what was to follow it was absolutely nothing. But it was bad enough and the discrimination of Yiddish speaking Jews in Czarist Russia was a sorry fact. (There was actually a second minority speaking a Germanic tongue that was conversely favoured by the authorities: ethnic German colonists and Baltic barons. After the revolution Germans were therefore overrepresented in the ranks of the White Army whereas Jews were over represented in the red Army.)

    It is a further fact that educated Eastern European Jews turned towards German culture. They learned German, spoke German at home and send their kids to German schools and universities.

    After the Russian revolution of 1917 there was a break down of public order and one quickly loses count when one tries to sum up incidents of antisemitic violence. Not surprisingly Jews all over Western Russia were very happy to see German troups restoring public order. In the second world war the positive image of Germany was one reason why Jews staid put when the Wehrmacht came.

    This was a very long post. Mr. Unz, one of my books is two thirds translated into English. I dare say you will find it interesting. It is the story of a man between Gestapo and GPU, Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia and the US. I consulted files in Moscow (archive of the Comintern), Berlin (Gestapo) and Washington (CIC, FBI a.s.o) to write it. The translation was done about 15 years ago but I never got around to finish it. If you promise not to show it to anybody else (the copyright of the translation is with the person who paid for it – not me) I will send it to you. Please see my Email adress above.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  348. @renfro

    Jabotinski, leader of the Irgun terrorist group, described zionist morality in 1923 in his article The Iron Wall

  349. nagra says:
    @Druid

    Who is nagar?
    ( you might be obviously drunk : )

    But since I’m “paid troll” for you would you mind to tell us what language Palestinians speak?
    Enlighten us please.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  350. iffen says:
    @AaronB

    If you don’t believe in that, I don’t think you can have a group identity.

    What did the Bolsheviks have?

  351. iffen says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Don’t sugar coat it, CS, give it to us straight.

  352. Glancing through a few sections [of 200 Years Together], the work seemed quite even-handed and innocuous to me, but it seemed to provide a far more detailed and uncensored account than anything else previously available, which obviously was the problem. The Bolshevik Revolution resulted in the deaths of many tens of millions of people worldwide, and the overwhelming Jewish role in its leadership would become more difficult to erase from historical memory if Solzhenitsyn’s work were easily available. Also, his candid discussion of the economic and political behavior of Russian Jewry in pre-revolutionary times directly conflicted with the hagiography widely promoted by Hollywood and the popular media.

    This is a propaganda technique, which you will sometimes notice in begging letters from charities. To elicit sympathy for a group, it must be portrayed as morally pure.

    Therefore Jews wish to remind us of the times when they were victims, but never of the times when they were perpetrators.

    despite [200 Years Together's] 2002 release in Russian and numerous other world languages, there has yet to be an authorized English translation

    It is available in French and German but not in English. The fear of anti-semitism is no greater in the English-speaking world than in France or Germany, so why this strange omission?

    I suggest that American support for the state of Israel is so valuable to Jews that they dare not risk losing the support of American public opinion. If 200 Years Together were published in English, its publisher would face a quiet boycott in the literary world, and would be forced out of business.

    In the post-war years, there were daring Jewish publishers such as Victor Gollancz and George Weidenfeld, who were not afraid to publish controversial material. Their companies are now imprints of a large multinational publisher. The scope for risk-taking or personal initiative in this new corporate world is limited.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  353. Skeptikal says:
    @Tom67

    ” why the German-Jewish elite supported Germany in the first world war. THEY IDENTIFIED AS GERMANS. ”

    Of course they did! Why would any intelligent person question this?
    And they did NOT support the Zionist program.
    They thought that this would be very bad for all Jews—to that extent they identified as Jews.
    They knew that their pretty successful assimilation could be “turned back” very quickly—was not that well established. For example, a Gentile country girl (such as my grandmother) who married an established German Jewish Bankier (yes, that is the correct term) could be ostracized by her family back in the Hinterland.

    The Zionist virus had the potential to infect everything these assimilated Jews had achieved.
    They were Germans, foremost, and that is why many of them refused to leave Germany, even in the thirties: They felt that they would be regarded as traitors, especially if they were in finance.

    “It is a further fact that educated Eastern European Jews turned towards German culture. They learned German, spoke German at home and send their children to German schools and universities.”

    In the Anglo-American world, very little is understood or even known of the German diaspora in Eastern Europe, going back to the Middle Ages. The first “German” university was the Karlsuniversitaet Prag. Again, to use shorthand, Germans brought “culture” and education as well as technical know-how to Eastern Europe, the Baltics, Russia, Hungary, etc.

    A number of educated Jews from Eastern Europe, if they could, migrated to German cities such as, especially, Berlin, once they were allowed to do so.
    And became Germans.

    An interesting work of that builds on this historical background is
    Memoirs of an Anti-Semite, by Gregor von Rezzori

  354. Skeptikal says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Does anyone know the source is of the English=language version available online as a pdf?
    Who did the translation?
    How reliable it is?
    Was it translated directly from Russian, or is it a translation from French or German?

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  355. Heros says:
    @Karl

    “one or two murders PER CENTURY, do not a “ritual” make”

    Of course jews are going to lie, lie, lie and project their depravity and guilt on any and every body else.

  356. AaronB says:
    @iffen

    Good point.

    • Replies: @iffen
  357. APilgrim says:
    @nagra

    1st Languages

    Some Christian Palestinians speak Aramaic, which is the 1st Century Hebrew language used in Israel. Most Muhammadan Palestinians speak Arabic.

    Lots of Palestinians and Israelis speak multiple languages. English is common. Russian is not rare.

    • Replies: @nagra
  358. Chu says:

    Not to be forgotten is Judge Goldstone and his report on the Gaza massacre in 2014. He retracted his report after pressure from Jewish groups.

  359. Chu says:
    @RobinG

    I liked how they indoctrinated the kids in Israel before they flew to Poland that the world (etc al) hates Jews. More evidence on how the socially control their congregants, even without the rabbinate’s influences.

  360. @AaronB

    But please refrain from doing as Popes, Imams and Shamans all do, namely try to impose the ethics you derive from vague spirituality on anyone but your family.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  361. @dearieme

    I agree with all of this.

    There are many aspects of Corbyn’s leadership that are problematic, but it does not pose an “existential threat” to Jews in Britain or anywhere else.

    It seems to me that the “internationally accepted” definition of anti-semitism is far too broad. It forbids, for example,

    claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor

    so anyone who believes (as the mass-immigration crowd does) that all nation-states are racist endeavours, is automatically an anti-semite. This might seem to be an unreasonably pedantic observation, but it is similar in character to the exchange between Corbyn and the Board of Deputies of British Jews, in which Corbyn “sprang into life with a ‘convulsion’ when told his support for ‘two state solution’ in the rift between Israel and Palestine meant he was a ‘Zionist’”.

    The definition of anti-semitism also forbids

    Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

    When this insult is applied to Labour politician Margaret Hodge, with no particular evidence, it is obviously anti-semitic. When it is applied to Paul Wolfowitz, architect of the Iraq war, it might actually be true!

    The Jewish Chronicle will keep pushing because Labour does harbour a great deal of anti-semitism. Jeremy Corbyn himself is afflicted with full-blown Radical Chic syndrome: he regards Hamas, Hezbollah, and the (pre-ceasefire) Provisional IRA as his “friends”, and he allegedly supported the release from prison of Abdul Aziz Umar, the organizer of a suicide bombing in Jerusalem in 2003 that killed seven people:

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/londoners-diary/the-londoner-corbyn-defended-hamas-brother-a3899281.html

    Umar was charged with providing a safe house for the terrorists and guarding the property as they fitted the bomber with a suicide belt. He was released a year before his Press TV appearance as part of the prisoner swap arranged to release Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

    “You have to ask the question why they are in prison in the first place,” said the now Labour leader. “I’m glad that those who were released were released.”

    Part of Corbyn’s problem is that he never expected to become Labour leader, so he never bothered to hold his tongue: he let the world know what he really thinks. Nobody else expected him to become leader either, and so for example he has not passed through the British-American Project’s vetting procedure. Even if he were squeaky-clean, there would be moves to depose him. But he is not squeaky-clean, and his affinity for terrorist killers makes him an easy target.

    The leaked account of Jeremy Corbyn’s meeting with the Board of Deputies concluded that he was ‘too unemotional or too stupid’ to understand claims that he has failed to combat anti-Semitism in the Labour Party. I think they are right.

    • Replies: @hyperbola
  362. @renfro

    One ginormous omission. Where can we get the benefit (beyond abbreviated hearsay summary) of your immense researches?

    • Replies: @renfro
  363. APilgrim says:
    @Wally

    Your personal attacks & pseudo-science are unconvincing.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    , @Wally
  364. APilgrim says:

    Shark Island Namibia was the location of an earlier German extermination camp.

    In 1904, Germany’s Second Reich, under Kaiser Wilhelm II, had a colony called German Southwest Africa, today’s Namibia. The Germans wanted to develop the colony for agriculture and settlement.

    The local indigenous people from the Herero and Nama tribes occupied the land, so the Germans slaughtered them. Fully 80 percent of the Herero and 60 percent of the Nama men, women, and children perished. This was a genocide, defined as “the deliberate intent to exterminate, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.”

    Key perpetrators of this African genocide became high-ranking Nazis 30 years later. Names are chillingly familiar: Dr. Heinrich Ernst Goering was Namibia’s governor. His son, Hermann Goering, became a top Nazi leader. Eugen Fischer, a physician and professor of medicine, conducted experiments on the Herero that included forced sterilizations and injections of smallpox, typhus and tuberculosis. One of Fischer’s students was Dr. Joseph Mengele, known as the “angel of death” for sending people to the Auschwitz gas chambers and performing cruel medical experiments that he learned from Fischer. Franz Ritter von Epp commanded German troops against the Herero and later was a Nazi leader until he was captured by the U.S. Army in 1945.

    Namibia was a trial run.

  365. @CanSpeccy

    Old Testament Jews did follow morality of which the Decalogue still applies. Talmudic Jews are not their theological descendants; Catholics are. Talmudic Judaism is a rejection of the Old Testament. It is Logos-rejecting social revolution masquerading as religion.

    See E. Michael Jones’ The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History for over one thousand pages of details.

    • Agree: Intelligent Dasein
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  366. Johnj says:

    If we compare Jewish crimes and Christian crimes over the last 500 years which would be worst? There were trials by fire and trials of witches in the Christian camp.

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @notanon
    , @Seraphim
  367. AaronB says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Fair enough. I don’t want to forcibly impose anything on anyone. It would make no sense. People have to work out their own karma.

    I’m just trying to show people what I think is missing in the modern world, but no one has to agree.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @UnzReader
  368. APilgrim says:

    The term ‘catholic’ is an archaic synonym for ‘universal’.

    “Old Testament Jews did follow morality of which the Decalogue still applies. Talmudic Jews are not their theological descendants; catholics are.”

    There, fixed it for you.

  369. @Skeptikal

    Does anyone know the source is of the English=language version available online as a pdf?
    Who did the translation?
    How reliable it is?
    Was it translated directly from Russian, or is it a translation from French or German?

    A fragment of the book, professionally translated, is available on Scribd (see below the fold).

    Reading this fragment makes clear that conveying the author’s tone is an important aspect of the translation. The translator also provides some of the footnotes, to explain points that are not obvious to an English speaker, reading 100 years after the events that are described.

    For these reasons, I would not trust anything less than a professional translation of the rest of the book – even though it means I must wait.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  370. Skeptikal says:

    I don’t see why we can’t just say “anti-Jewish” and drop the stupid “anti-Semitic” phrase.”

    Isn’t “anti-Jewish” what is really meant when people shout “anti-Semitism!!”?

    Wouldn’t it clear the atmosphere to use a clear term, not an outdated euphemism that basically has no meaning?

    Then, those who wish to profess their “anti-Jewish” sentiments can just do so.

    And one would not be accepting the framing of the whole “anti-Semitism” crowd.

    “Anti-Catholic”; “anti-Protestant”; “Islamophobic” etc. are not illegal to utter.
    So why not level the playing field.

    • Replies: @Felix-Culpa
  371. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @AaronB

    “I’m just trying to show people what I think is missing in the modern world…”

    And you’re absolutely right. But as you know most people won’t understand because they’re simply too “ignorant” or not ready.

    Anyway, I don’t think it’s possible to convince someone to follow the path. “Modern world” is too noisy and here (Unz) is one of the noisiest places.
    I like reading your posts.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  372. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB

    I can’t imagine the point of life is to be concerned with politics.

    But politics is concerned with you.

    Jews are on top now, tomorrow it’ll be someone else.

    Not really. There are many rich Jews and many Jews in positions of influence, especially in banking, higher education, the legal and medical professions and the entertainments industry. But there are many more rich and influential people in American who are not Jews. Most of America’s economy, manufacturing, energy, agriculture, transportation, etc., is largely run by non-Jews. Most members of the US governing class are non-Jews. To think that Jews are somehow responsible for everything rotten in America, notwithstanding the obvious rottenness of many of the the non-Jewish elite is simply dumb.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Anon
  373. AaronB says:
    @anonymous

    Thanks.

    Right, I’ve also concluded that people in the modern West are just not ready yet. There were some positive indicators that things are changing, but they were false signs. Its too soon.

    Since I’ve been posting here, I’d have to say the spiritual level has actually dropped. Guys who I thought initially had a spark of spirituality that needed to be fanned into a flame, have actually revealed themselves to be the most vicious materialists.

    Anatoly Karlins blog has recently descended into a cesspool, and most intelligent people have left.

    This is actually pretty common for blogs – there seems to be a downward trend that is inescapable. On whatever level they start off, they always get worse rather than better. I’ve been on several blogs where this happened.

    So the great descent continues, and the West is not ready yet. It is still in the throes of an irresistible downward pull.

    I take this as a lesson on the proper purpose if life – in every generation a certain number of souls will achieve “enlightenment”, and the purpose of life is not politics or social organization.

    One mistake of mine was to focus on collectivism – it is obvious that today everyone has to go it alone, and in fact spiritual people should strive to be as isolated from others as possible. That way you can actually cultivate a deeper unity.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  374. Mulegino1 says:
    @APilgrim

    It’s not “pseudo-science.” It is honest to goodness forensic examination, and it proves that the alleged homicidal gas chambers did not exist in Auschwitz-Birkenau (or anywhere else for that matter). There was no “Holocaust” of the Jews, if by that term you mean an industrial scale, deliberate genocide. You cannot point to a single mass grave, or a single trace of human remains commensurate with hundreds of thousands of victims, let alone upwards of 4 million.

    The so called “Holocaust” is the biggest shakedown/guilt extortion racket in history, and constitutes a vile blood libel against the Christian peoples of Europe. The carriers of this mendacious fable, international Jewry, know that the game is about up, so the only option they have left is to double down on the bullshit. The world is growing tired of their whining, their warmongering and their litigiousness.

  375. @iffen

    What did the Bolsheviks have?

    Are you serious? Marxism is a colossal ideology that was developed in every particular by a host of academics and philosophers great and small, plus their thousands of associated propagandists and pamphleteers. Marxist exegesis probably accounts for half the academic writing produced over the last century and a half. Its ideas have spread into every corner of public life—sociology, psychology, economics, religion, government—it’s all been thoroughly worked over by the Marxists. Wherever there is problem, there is Marxist on the scene with a tract and a theory. As ideologies go, it has been one of the most developed and rigorous ever to appear on Earth.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @iffen
  376. Another masterpiece. Honest, comprehensive and even-handed.

    I would comment that while there is such a thing as mass media, the term, “mainstream media” is probably a deliberate distortion of reality and seems a propaganda term similar to the silly canard, “anti-Semitism.”

    Calling it “mainstream” is a subtle way of conferring legitimacy and authority on utter trash. It’s a form of brainwashing that none of us should participate in.

  377. Heros says:
    @Johnj

    Typical jew deflection. The issue here is Jewish lies and blood sacrifices, so of course jews are going to point the finger and say “look over there, a Christian”.

    • Agree: Them Guys
  378. AaronB says:
    @CanSpeccy

    I definitely don’t think everything rotten in America is the fault of Jews. Rather the opposite – the complete spiritual rot among white Americans makes Jews dominate easily.

    America was established by whites specifically as a place for aggressive economic competition where money is the primary value and a cold individualism reigns, and rapaciousness as a way of life is the norm, and where an impersonal abstract set of principles is substituted for a warm organic culture that grows over centuries in a natural process.

    America is the quintessence of modern European culture.

    Jews had nothing to do with this. Being spiritually healthier, they can easily stick together and dominate. Despite all their negative traits, Jews present a more attractive picture than the typical nihilistic white materialist, as I’ve found out.

    But Jews are declining as well, and will fall rather soon.

    As for politics bring concerned with me, not really. The more you engage with spirituality, the more you find you don’t need what you thought you did. I have enough money to live well according to my lights, thank God, but I find as the years pass I am happy on less and less, and can be supremely content with a tiny fraction of what the average westerners think essential to his mental health.

    All I need is nature, a bit of free time, some books, some good conversation – and I am in paradise!

    I can be happy almost under any political system.

  379. iffen says:
    @AaronB

    And one more thing.

    If religion is the only way of keeping a group together, why are there literally tens of thousands of religious groups and sects?

    • Replies: @AaronB
  380. @Sic Semper

    My sisters and I all attended the University of Delaware. There was a very imminent history professor there by the name of Dr. Raymond Wolters. Unfortunately, I never had him, but my sisters did. They both told a tale of two Jewish women constantly contradicting everything he said in class. He wasn’t a progressive.

  381. Ace says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    The Skripals’ misadventure (contretemps, dust up, theater, bit of bother) is absurd but did the U.K. government embrace it with alacrity and a vengeance or what? The only thing missing was narration by Edgar R. Murrow. Not to mention the Skripals.

    The very absurdity of it calls into question anything that preceded it with the same story line, viz., “Russians are animals.”

    What anyone needs to be wary of is the people who push this and other “narratives”: “Animal Assad,” “religion of peace,” “multiculturalism,” “propositional nation,” “comprehensive immigration law reform,” “living Constitution,” “equality,” “hate speech,” “Iranchiefsponsorofterror,” “regime change,” “treason,” “collusion,” “McCarthyism,” “humanitarian intervention,” “global/climate freeze/warming/change/disruption,” “anti-Semitism,” “Judeo-Christian,” “target civilians/hospitals,” and such like.

  382. AaronB says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Its also obviously the a corrupt version of all the great spiritual traditions of mankind – it’s basically materialist spirituality.

    Which is why it’s literally unstoppable as long as materialism reigns.

  383. Heros says:

    Typical Jew deflection. Caught time after time after time over thousands of years cheating Christians, lying to Chrisitians, defrauding Christians, murdering Christians and blood sacrificing their children, poisoning their wells, and trying to propagate the most outrageous and impossible lies about their fake holocaust, and what does the Jew do? Out of reflex, his spittle flinging turns to his most despised foe after Russians: the Germans. The Germans bla bla bla. No proof, no credibility, only the time proven ability of the jew to lie and kvetch.

    What a race of swine.

    Speaking of jew swine, have you jews heard about your idol and saviour Steven Spielberg? The guy that created a string of lies about a cult of Christian baby murderers, who were finally locked up and forced to work a little to protect the German populace from their world leading terrorism, the same Germans they were planning genocide on? That Spielberg? The same one practically every jew in Hollywood has long known was a pedophile, because practically every jew in Hollywood is one too?

    Well Isaac Kappy has come out with some startling revelations about these jews in Hollywood and what they have been doing to Christian children:

    “Taking to Periscope, Kappy accuses Spielberg and Hanks, along with other influential figures, of sexual crimes against children, cannibalism, and other “sickening” rituals involving minors.

    No matter how disgusting and depraved you may think jews are, it is an underestimate. Just when you think there could not be a lower creature on the planet, jews out do themselves.

    • Agree: Kolo
    • Replies: @Heros
    , @Intelligent Dasein
  384. Don’t ask me why, but Jews always moved into German-American population centers. Even AFTER World War II when Jews came to Skokie it was a German enclave. Same with Queens (Where Trump’s father told Jewish renters he had been “born in Sweden”).

    In the US, Jews seemed to have problems with Irish-Catholics. Yet, Irish-Catholics eventually became the second group of Hollywood elite-Rosie, Mel Gibson, Nicholson etc.

    For that matter, Iranians moved into Jewish-dominated areas of Los Angeles. So did Armenians, who’d had a long history of antipathy for Jews-like the Kardashians.

  385. APilgrim says:

    I do not care for BullSHlT artists, in any subject area.

    Eisenhower Presidential Library & Museum, 200 SE 4th Street, Abilene, KS 67410, (877) 746-4453, The Eisenhower Presidential Library, Museum, and Boyhood Home is part of the Presidential Libraries System administered by the National Archives and Records Administration.

    [MORE]

    “When I found the first camp like that I think I never was so angry in my life. The bestiality displayed there was not merely piled up bodies of people that had starved to death, but to follow out the road and see where they tried to evacuate them so they could still work, you could see where they sprawled on the road. You could go to their burial pits and see horrors that really I wouldn’t even want to begin to describe. I think people ought to know about such things. It explains something of my attitude toward the German war criminal. I believe he must be punished, and I will hold out for that forever.” – Press conference, 6/18/45 [DDE's Pre-Presidential Papers, Principal File, Box 156, Press Statements and Releases, 1944-46 (1)]

    “We continue to uncover German concentration camps for political prisoners in which conditions of indescribable horror prevail. I have visited one of these myself and I assure you that whatever has been printed on them to date has been understatement. If you would see any advantage in asking about a dozen leaders of Congress and a dozen prominent editors to make a short visit to this theater in a couple of C-54s, I will arrange to have them conducted to one of these places where the evidence of bestiality and cruelty is so overpowering as to leave no doubt in their minds about the normal practices of the Germans in these camps.” – Cable, DDE to George C. Marshall, 4/19/45 [The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, The War Years IV, doc Number 2424]

    “But the most interesting – although horrible – sight that I encountered during the trip was a visit to a German internment camp near Gotha. The things I saw beggar description. While I was touring the camp I encountered three men who had been inmates and by one ruse or another had made their escape. I interviewed them through an interpreter. The visual evidence and the verbal testimony of starvation, cruelty and bestiality were so overpowering as to leave me a bit sick. In one room, where they [there] were piled up twenty or thirty naked men, killed by starvation, George Patton would not even enter. He said he would get sick if he did so. I made the visit deliberately, in order to be in position to give first-hand evidence of these things if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these allegations merely to ‘propaganda’.” – Letter, DDE to George C. Marshall, 4/15/45 [The Papers of Dwight David Eisenhower, The War Years IV, doc Number 2418]

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    , @silviosilver
  386. Heros says:
    @Heros

    And now we have another confirmation about Spielberg.

    Jews are still to this day molesting, raping, murdering, and extracting the blood and harvesting organs from Christian children on a massive scale.

    Meanwhile we have to play stupid jew games about how many million jews will fit into a 24′ shower.

    • Replies: @Heros
  387. AaronB says:
    @iffen

    That is indeed a good question – I do not have an answer for that.

  388. AaronB says:
    @AaronB

    Actually, Southern American culture was the only chance this country had to have a gracious and refined culture not based on mercantile ideals, and it was utterly crushed.

    Slavery was obviously bad, but it would have ended one way or another – and the South represented a cultural challenge to the soulless Northern culture of money and hustling that could not be ignored.

    So its not entirely true to say America was set up entirely as a place for brutal economic competition – for a moment it could have been different. But things went otherwise.

    • Replies: @iffen
    , @iffen
  389. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @AaronB

    the complete spiritual rot among white Americans makes Jews dominate easily.

    Complete spiritual rot may be descriptive of the moral state of Hillary Clinton and other scoundrel members of the American elite, but I reject the notion of complete spiritual rot among Americans as a whole, white, black or any other color. Rather, it would seem that most Americans are horribly distracted, spending nearly half the day interacting with media. Thus, when the FANG stocks crash, we’ll know that the American soul has been saved.

    America was established by whites specifically as a place for aggressive economic competition where money is the primary value and a cold individualism reigns, and rapaciousness as a way of life is the norm, and where an impersonal abstract set of principles is substituted for a warm organic culture that grows over centuries in a natural process.

    America is the quintessence of modern European culture.

    That’s a hopeless muddle! Too muddled even to attempt to unravel. But think about this: how can the America of 1776 be the “quintescence of modern European culture?

    As for politics bring concerned with me, not really… I have enough money to live well according to my lights, thank God

    Politics can get you in many ways, including the hydrogen bomb, wealth-destroying inflation, or the collapse of services, from policing to water supply and sewage disposal, food distribution and disease control, upon which just about every life depends. You may ignore politics, but politics may not ignore you.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @peterAUS
  390. @Heros

    I don’t know anything about these specific accusations, but Spielberg’s entire oeuvre as a directer/producer can be aptly described as a “cult of childhood.” From ET and Batteries not Included to the sickeningly saccharine AI, it’s all been one massive attempt to penetrate the inner lives of children, particularly male children. This is not inconsistent with pedophile behavior. Spielberg comes across as a more sophisticated, less edgy version of Michael Jackson.

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @Anon
  391. renfro says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    One ginormous omission. Where can we get the benefit (beyond abbreviated hearsay summary) of your immense researches?

    Well you could get it from my 203 files.

    Or you could call 1 -800- rent – a brain and for a small fee rent enough of a brain to do the research yourself.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  392. APilgrim says:

    It appears that a few NXIVM cultists are trolling this site. Very bizarre stuff … IMHPO

    Keith Raniere, the founder of NXIVM told the “Jewish women” in his life that they were reincarnated Nazis who had to serve him for atonement.

    Liquor heiress charged with aiding group called a ‘sex cult’ NXIVM: Clare Bronfman’s attorney says her client did nothing wrong. By TOM HAYS The Associated Press Jul 24, 2018, http://www.lockportjournal.com/news/liquor-heiress-charged-with-aiding-group-called-a-sex-cult/article_1b568a06-f709-588e-bac3-96e7bb87bcaf.html

    Clare’s father, Edgar Bronfman was President of the World Jewish Congress [from 1979-2007.] He was also President of the World Jewish Restitution Organization, whose stated objective is to ensure “…the return of communal Jewish property stolen by the Nazis and then by the communists in Eastern Europe, and property in Western Europe stolen by the Nazis and unaccounted for.”

    https://artvoice.com/2018/01/02/exclusive-raniere-claimed-he-had-proof-for-holocaust-denial-so-bronfman-zionists-had-to-stop-him-at-commodities/#.W2HpGdVKjX4http://www.thetanster.com/blog/2018/6/30/apparently-keith-raniere-told-the-jewish-women-in-his-life-that-they-were-reincarnated-nazis-who-had-to-serve-him-for-atonement

    • LOL: utu
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  393. @AaronB

    Excuse my intervention if you are American but surely your statement “America was established by whites specifically as a place for aggressive economic competition…etc.” is total rubbish unless you somehow see it as being established about 1870. Think Pilgrim Fathers. Think those fanatical witch hunters of Salem.

    • Agree: iffen
    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @APilgrim
  394. Heros says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    I have been following the Spielberg allegations since Pizzagate broke. It appears that Kappy has accused the following:

    Seth Green
    James Gunn
    Dan Scheinder
    Steven Spielberg
    Tom Hanks
    Steven Colbert
    Jimmy Kimmel
    Barack Obama
    Kevin Spacey
    Kathy Griffin

    These accusations are not your vanilla style Catholic buggery. This is ritual child sacrifice, a la Jimmy Saville.

    So how will jews deal with it when their depravity is finally exposed? Just the same as always, squeal, kvetch, murder, wars and genocide. It has happened so many times throughout history its like watching old Seinfeld episodes.

  395. AaronB says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Perhaps then the spiritual rot of our elites, but really, I think the average American is as bad. Its popular to blame elites and excuse the common man, but I don’t know how true that is.

    True, some extreme political breakdowns would be bad – ill just have to deal with it if it happens.

  396. Anon[199] • Disclaimer says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    For someone who declares to not know “anything about these specific accusations,” you are doing fine work of attaching a sympathetic, more pointedly, alleging a (fatuous) link, between children’s authors and paedophilia.

    By the standards of this beetle “Heros”, J.K Rowling, Tolkien, Lewis, Seuss, Kipling, Twain, Carroll, Verne, H.G. Wells, Beverly Cleary, Rene Goscinny, R.L. Stevenson etc are all possible paedophiles.

    • Replies: @Heros
  397. AaronB says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    But the Puritans were very money obsessed from an early stage – there is extensive documentation of this. When America revolted from Britain it explicitly set itself up as a place governed by abstract enlightenment ideals which would provide a neutral framework for the pursuit wealth.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  398. Mulegino1 says:
    @APilgrim

    Never mind that it was the Allies (primarily the RAF and the USAAF) that were primarily responsible for the plight of the internees during the last weeks of the war. Germany was mostly destroyed. Its transportation, power and supply infrastructure were in absolute ruins, thanks to the “liberators.”

    Then, this evil bastard “good old Ike” committed far worse atrocities against “disarmed enemy personnel in his Rhine Meadows starvation camps. These “liberators” had an abundance of food and supplies with which to house and feed these men, but made it illegal to do so.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  399. Skeptikal says:
    @James N. Kennett

    This is different from what I found (or clicked on) when I did a Google search.
    Namely, this:

    https://archive.org/stream/Solzhenitsyn200YearsTogether/Solzhenitsyn-200%20Years%20Together_djvu.txt

    This is the link I provided on another related thread (or maybe this one?) but I said I couldn’t vouch for it–just that I found it. So, still do not know what its provenance is.

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  400. @renfro

    Excuse me if I am missing something obvious but how can I see your 203 files?

    • Replies: @renfro
  401. Skeptikal says:
    @APilgrim

    What in the world is NXIVM?

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  402. @Skeptikal

    E. Michael Jones, in his book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History, addresses this question. Anti-Semitism is the term Wilhelm Marr gave the world. Marr identified the Jewish problem a DNA problem in accordance with the materialist fancy of his time. So, anti-Semitism is invalid as a method of criticism and has to be rejected. That Jews have tacitly redefined the term to mean “anyone Jews don’t like” and use it to shut down valid criticism of their ideology and its consequences, has robbed the term of its force.

    Jones notes that Judaism became something different after the Jewish rejection of Christ. We are no longer talking about a people whose religion is that of the Old Testament when we now speak of Judaism, we are talking about a people formed by the OT’s replacement, that is, the Talmud. And the Talmud produces not religious adherents but social revolutionaries; rejectors of mankind’s social order under which the human race flourishes. Opposition to this Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, ought to be unapologetically termed anti-Jewish, Jones argues.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  403. @renfro

    We have to end Jewish entitlement in the US before we can end the unholy US-Israel relationship.

    That answers your question,

    I am curious how those here who dislike Jews came to that dislike.

    Seeing mediocre tribesmen being preferred over highly competent goyim woke me up. The special treatment is everywhere, it seems, and is confirmed by other observers, most of whom have been ignored or smeared into oblivion or worse, and I’m not only referring to the “Anointed One.”

  404. Art says:
    @AaronB

    Metaphysics – abstract theory or talk with no basis in reality.

    AaronB,

    You are an advocate of spirituality and metaphysics.

    What is your “spirituality” – how does it manifest itself – is it a form of mediation on metaphysics?

    Has trance like mediation about things that “have no basis in reality” ever produce anything of actual value?

    In Western science, deep contemplation about factual matters has produced our modern world.

    Think Peace — Be Idealistic — Art

  405. And another thing…the yellow star depicted at the head of the article that we hear so much about. Seems there’re a few facts most aren’t aware of.

    Georg Kareski was a Berlin banker who was president of the Zionist Organization of Germany…and as a Zionist he was concerned, above all with promoting the migration of Jews to Palestine. …in 1938, Direktor Kareski advocated that Jews be forced to wear the Jewish star.

    http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/authors.php?auid=5929

    Such indicators were nothing new, however.

    Indian “messengers from the Emperor” coming to an English tract were required to wear a badge “upon paine of death”. Early on the badges were “a coate of striped stuffe (material)” picked up and returned by a messenger Indian at appointed places. In 1656 a “ticket” authorized passage. 1661/62 the badges became coin silver and copper medallions with the names of towns inscribed on them. These are the badges depicted here. These metal badges were given to the local kings to issue to messengers.

    http://www.chesapeakearchaeology.org/AnneGrulich/HTML%20Files/MaterialEvidence2.htm

    Even further back we have biblical references to marks of slavery.

    Exodus 21:1-6 And his master shall bore his ear through with an awl, and he shall be his slave forever.”

    Deut 15:12-17…then you shall take an awl, and put it through his ear into the door, and he shall be your slave forever.”

  406. Heros says:
    @Anon

    The jews are circling the wagons, and are setting up their anti-semite spittle flecking gatling guns. Low low moaning kvetch is rising out of heimi town:

    Dozens of people are coming forward and risking their lives to jewish revenge “blood libel” murders. Like the King David Hotel, or even 9/11 with the dancing Israeli’s. Die stupid goyim die.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  407. @AaronB

    No surprise then Jews rose to run everything.

  408. hyperbola says:
    @James N. Kennett

    When this insult is applied to Labour politician Margaret Hodge, with no particular evidence, it is obviously anti-semitic.

    Given her background, Hodge is not above scrutiny.

    Margaret Eve Oppenheimer was born in Egypt in 1944 to Hans and Lisbeth Oppenheimer, a refugee multi-millionaire German Jewish steel trader and his Austrian Jewish wife. The family’s company Stemcor is the world’s largest privately owned steel-trading corporation, with an annual turnover of £6.28 billion in 2008. After World War II, the family settled in London.

    She certainly fits in with other characteristics.

    Child abuse controversy
    In 1985, Demetrious Panton complained about abuse that he had suffered while in the council’s care in the 1970s and 1980s. He did not receive an official reply until 1989, in which the council denied responsibility.

    ….In 2003, following Hodge’s appointment as Minister for Children, Demetrious Panton went public with his allegation that he was abused in Islington Council care and had repeatedly raised this issue with no effect. He accused Hodge of being ultimately responsible for the abuse that he suffered. Davies also went public with the issues that she had raised concerns about while working for the council.

    Following a media campaign conducted by several national newspapers calling for her to resign from her new post, she responded to Panton by letter, in which she referred to him as ‘extremely disturbed’. Panton then passed the letter to the press which planned to publish it, only to be judicially restrained from doing so at the instruction of Hodge. The letter was eventually published, mainly on the grounds that the blocking of the letter was seen as disproportionate. Hodge was forced to publicly apologise and offered to contribute to a charity of the man’s choosing as recompense…..

    • Replies: @James N. Kennett
  409. Art says:
    @AaronB

    I definitely don’t think everything rotten in America is the fault of Jews. Rather the opposite – the complete spiritual rot among white Americans makes Jews dominate easily.

    AaronB,

    This is what spirituality and metaphysics does for you – Zero reality.

    The greatest advocates of materialism and money in America are Jews.

    You have an ugly disgusting hateful mind. Where does it come from?

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Practice Hope, Love, Truth, & idealism — Art

    p.s. The truth – the Talmudic Jews have brought spiritual rot to America.

  410. iffen says:
    @AaronB

    Actually, Southern American culture was the only chance this country had to have a gracious and refined culture not based on mercantile ideals, and it was utterly crushed.

    So the “materialistic” North was able to unite disparate races and ethnicities to defeat a homogeneous “spiritual” South.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  411. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB

    Have you ever thought about a simple fact: takes around 30 years to make a person who is spiritual (on average).
    Takes around 5 seconds to kill him/her.

    As one poster said here: you don’t need to get concerned with politics. The “others” will then, with ease, use that “politics” as a tool to take you down/out.
    Guys coming to do that, at 2 in the morning, aren’t the types into spiritual pursuits; most of the time they can’t put together a long sentence.
    To prevent them from raping and killing your womenfolk and killing your manfolk, after watching the former, no debate on spirituality will work.
    Belt fed machinegun could.

    Now I think I get the angle you are coming from and that’s admirable.
    It is also naive.

    Karlin’s blog tends to attract people interested in that part of the world. Those regions have been ruled by brute, naked force. Not by high spirituality.

    I just have a feeling that you don’t, really, get the political violence.

    The first thing that serious “others” do is to take out the spiritual and intellectual elite. From home detention to on the spot execution.

    So, true, your types can do that. Just live lives as you want and if/when that moment comes, well, you accept it and of you go. Free will.
    The thing is….can you accept that for your kids?
    If you can’t, well, then you MUST get into politics. You MUST find a way to motivate and organize hard men to do the work for you. You know…fire that machinegun, for example; three guys usually. And almost always such guys aren’t into high minded intellectual and spiritual pursuits. Simpletons by your social group standards.
    But, then, your social group guys wouldn’t last 5 minutes with that machinegun; those simpletons could do it all night…..

    I like to point, in cases like this, to Hague court.
    Recent events, documented as well as they can be, in Europe.
    I suggest reading up how those sides dealt with educated people from the “other” group, spiritual leaders in particular. For example:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bijeljina_massacre

    Take a look at that picture (one picture thousands words…).
    You’d be the people on the ground in that/similar scenario.

    So, it’s very easy to lecture people from within safe modern Western society, upper middle class part of the city.
    That guy on the ground, I am sure he could’ve shamed the “kicker” in 15 seconds flat on any intellectual/spiritual topic of this world.

    So, yes, I believe that your pursuits and attitude, in real world, are admirable.
    The problem is, that’s just a part of the real game. A small part, actually.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Jeff Stryker
  412. iffen says:
    @AaronB

    Not to mention the fact that slavery was predicated on making money, lots of money, and the refusal by the fire-eaters to give up that money making institution led directly to the War.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  413. peterAUS says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Politics can get you in many ways, including the hydrogen bomb, wealth-destroying inflation, or the collapse of services, from policing to water supply and sewage disposal, food distribution and disease control, upon which just about every life depends. You may ignore politics, but politics may not ignore you.

    Yup.

    Having said that, there are people who can do that. Their belief/value system is so strong that they could forfeit their very lives in such situation. That could even be seen as truly admirable.
    Putting own children in the same basket is another matter altogether.

    Besides….hehe….easy to talk about it here.
    Facing that moment of truth is, again, another matter altogether.

    The types “I could NEVER take a human life”. “Yeah……….sure………sure you can’t…I believe you..”.

    My take is, around 1 % of “talkers” could really do that.
    If that.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  414. iffen says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Yes. It is odd to see a contemporary scholar or writer referenced as Marxist.

    My point to AaronB was that they didn’t have a religion based on the supernatural and they certainly held together for a while, and as you point out the ideology still has uniting power.

  415. APilgrim says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    WOZ apparently never read the works of William Bradford: Of Plymouth Plantation, Mourt’s Relation & Dialogues.

    What a misguided statement …

  416. Treg says:

    Two Hundred Years Together, Alexander Solzhenitsyn — “…without Jews, there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew, nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood maddened Jewish terrorists have murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.”

    “You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russian. They hated Russians. Driven by ethnic hatred, they tortured and murdered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators”.

  417. Ace says:
    @nagra

    Red Army losses were enormous. U.S. losses were not even close to that. We did not face the cream of the Wehrmacht as the Red Army did. Our losses were not inconsequential, however.

    Don’t be an ass.

  418. APilgrim says:
    @Skeptikal

    Skeptikal wrote: “What in the world is NXIVM?”

    Skeptikal,

    Is your Search Engine Broken?

    We can explain things to you, but cannot understand them for you.

  419. AaronB says:
    @peterAUS

    Right, the kind of spirituality I was talking about here was very individual – go into the forest and do your thing. Its available to anyone under most political systems.

    Its not a social or political solution, you are right.

    However, at some points in history it may be the correct choice – to wait things out and preserve good values until things are more propitious.

    What else can one do? One needs judgement to decide.

    Fighting spiritual battle in an environment that isn’t even slightly ready can actually do damage to the spiritual person and lead to a loss of good values, not to mention a waste if good energy – in that situation, it may be better to retreat to the metaphorical woods with some like minded people and wait it out.

    The hard thing is to decide when the environment is for the moment hopeless – I.e completely not ready, and when its just difficult. Not easy.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  420. AaronB says:
    @iffen

    I probably have a different I interpretation than you on what really caused the war, but I think you make a good point that the North did have a spiritual that proved compelling – a vision of “progress”.

    Nor am I defending the South in its entirety – but it seems to me now that today, moral progress depends on resurrecting certain values that existed once in the South.

  421. APilgrim says:
    @Heros

    Muhammadans were the ones dancing in Texas on 911.

    A fair number of Muhammadans got their butts whipped over it.

    Ashkenazim of my acquaintance were as horrified as any other American.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @annamaria
  422. @iffen

    The South actually preferred blacks to Italians and Huey Long passed a law against employing or importing them.

    The North was more or less Anglo-Saxon in 1865. The Italians, Jews, Irish-Catholics, Polish, Germans, Scandinavians, Greeks did not enter the US until the 1880′s for the most part.

    The character of the North with its ethnic neighborhoods arose in the 1880 to 1930, fueled by factories.

    • Replies: @iffen
  423. APilgrim says:
    @Mulegino1

    ‘I Like Ike!’

    1944 had a cold winter. Eurasia was devoid of crops and industry, due to the ravages of war. The USA was producing virtually everything during the war. Americans tightened their belts, and rationed everything, for the war effort, and the recovery.

    We fed Eurasia, even the God Damned Communist War Criminals and the God Forsaken Fascist War Criminals and the Imperial GodlessNIPS. None of them deserved a table scrap, but we fed them.

    There were shortages of ships, trains, trucks, and fuel; but we produced those as well. Nobody else could. Nobody else would. But we did it.

  424. @peterAUS

    Byrant convinced Australians that they could not be trusted with guns, so you no longer have automatic weapons.

    The NRA ran ads depicting Australians cowering in their houses in their campaign.

    Which is untrue.

    That ad was in the late 90′s.

  425. @peterAUS

    you strike me as a bit deranged, Peter.

  426. Skeptikal says:
    @Felix-Culpa

    ” Opposition to this Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, ought to be unapologetically termed anti-Jewish, Jones argues.”

    I agree. I think.
    When I was a child I never gave a thought abouit Judaism, even though I am 1/4 Jewish. My mother was a totally assimilated German Jew.
    So, the first Jews qua Jews I met were summer visitors from Westchester County and Scarsdale to the place where I lived. And then, students in t he private day school I attended.
    I never gave the fact of their Jewishness any thought whatsoever. I was proud of my quarter Jewish ancestry—and still am. Because my grandfather was a smart fellow!
    The more I became exposed to the Palestinian plight, through a friend who was in the first Freedom Flotilla, the more I have read the history of the Jews, the more I have learned about the internal workings of Judaism for the Jewish community—the more disgusted I have become by the whole thing! The more pity I feel for regular Jews who are trapped in this subculture. The more I have come to think that Jews really should all have converted to Christianity. Even though I am not a Christian, I perceive that Christianity does have something to offer the world, whereas Judaism has nothing.
    I have become disgusted with both the Jewish faith and Jewish nationalism. I don’t really think there is such a thing as the Jewish faith. It is really an empty shell.
    At this point I think I can describe myself honestly as anti-Jewish.

  427. APilgrim says:
    @Treg

    Joe Stalin, the Georgian former Orthodox Monk, killed most of the Jewish Communist Party Leaders, after the death of Lenin . “On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences”was a report by Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev made to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on 25 February 1956.

  428. @AaronB

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.

    That most commenters here (resident trolls such as Rosie, Colin Wright, EliteCommInc. and so forth notwithstanding) tend to espouse broadly similar beliefs is irrelevant to the question of whether those beliefs are “edgy and nonconformist,” because they most certainly would be viewed as the latter by those right-thinking goodwhites still is enmeshed in the matrix (assuming that they didn’t immediately collapse into hysterics upon being confronted with said beliefs).

  429. @AaronB

    But anyways my point is that many on Karlins blog seem to genuinely resent women qua women – and without some ideal for women, even if it involves different rights and duties than men, you again aren’t going to win.

    To not resent women for their behaviour en mass over the past hundred years (well, longer, really, but definitely kicking into high gear over the course of the 20th century and into the present) would, I think, demand that the intellectually-consistent man adopt the position that women are rather like large children, and thus do not possess true agency or responsibility for their actions.

    I think you’re doing those commenters an additional disservice as well in suggesting that they have no “ideal for women” in mind; I suspect most do, even if it goes unmentioned.

  430. this jew dared to mention the forbidden and i think he lost his job over it.
    it is an amazing video about the rabbinic revenge, or as you call it now in murica CIRCUMCISION.
    never mind that you are the only western country that allows genital mutilation, not on girls luckily i might add. there is literally no difference in the result tho, as lately as the 70`s murican doctors openly and honestly stated and wrote in literature it was to stop boys from masturbating and enjoy sex fully. see dr kellogg and how howling mad they were a 100 yrs ago btw.

    You simply refuse to study what the true function of the foreskin is and live in cognitive dissonans to cope with the fact that deep down you know that you destroyed your childs genital/reproductive organ and ONLY source to experience real sexual pleasure as he grows up.

    Never mind it is an puritan tradition to controle their tribe, just as the rabbis that decided to shred the foreskin and suck the blood from newborn babies thousands of years ago is still a living and thriving tribe.. many of you even worship that tribe today, yet have no real knowledge about them or their customs and true beliefs i might add.
    Maybe one of them will telling the truth will make some of you think and stop that barbaric custom so your boys will experience a full life.

    All your “arguments” is teared to shreds like a foreskin in the video,muuh hygiene argument and such are daft and only makes me wonder how you manage to wash your hands tbh, so dont bother with typing them or the std bs.. just yell instead if you must share ur feelz wo watching or knowledge on the topic, i dgaf bc it proves you didnt bother to see the video or do some real research… and people like that must be braindead or brainwashed imho. but know i have deep sympathy and im sorry that you never will experience true sex bc of retarded opinions the last centuries on sexual morals and that your father didnt know better and defendef you as he should have out of lack of knowledge i hope, a jews father did it so the rabbis could get their revenge and fear/group pressure/malice and it is his evidence he is a jew. I truly understand the need to live in cognitive dissonans to cope with it, im a father to. Please let this tradition end with you.
    To the Christian men i ask why do you not read the Bible? Galatians 5 will shock you i guess, you are in BIG BIG trouble mr and mrs Stopwanking, mr mrs Hygiene, mr mrs Stdprevention, mr mrs Cancerdicks and every one else, you are truly proven to be lukewarm or fake christians.
    they to are mentioned in the Good book to, but i guess you didnt know that either;)
    (im orthodox Christian)

    (age restricted on yt,but i didnt find another link)

    how much $ is there in the lube business?
    who wrote aap`s papers on this topic, do you believe they are unbiased?
    those simple questions will lead to the rabbitholes entrance and let you see how far it is to the first bend, learn what it is you steal from the boy, the male gspot is one thing..
    There is no objective reasons to let this horrible abuse continue, non.
    Sorry for ranting like a lunatic, i truly find genital mutilation abhorrent and i let my my feelz write wo caring abt the lenght..
    just watch the video and you will at least understand me if not agree..

    &t=3s

    • Replies: @APilgrim
    , @APilgrim
  431. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB

    ….. the kind of spirituality I was talking about here was very individual – go into the forest and do your thing.Its available to anyone under most political systems.

    It is.
    If you don’t need any services (as medical, for example) and can hide there from people not liking you and keen on finding you. That opens a lot of other practical problems.

    Two scenarios, at least:
    In Western world, say, you “go to the forrest” and don’t pay your taxes. They WILL find you.
    In less civilized parts of the world maybe they won’t find you but you have to be bloody good and have some very good friends to do that.

    As for this:

    …to wait things out and preserve good values until things are more propitious.

    What else can one do? One needs judgement to decide.

    agree, of course.
    If….if…you do that to be as ready as possible “until things are more propitious.”
    Christianity, Catholic Church in particular, was that spiritual, even psychological, “shelter” under Communism in some countries before the fall of The Wall. Poland, Slovenia and Croatia as prime examples.

    Fighting spiritual battle in an environment that isn’t even slightly ready can actually do damage to the spiritual person and lead to a loss of good values, not to mention a waste if good energy – in that situation, it may be better to retreat to the metaphorical woods with some like minded people and wait it out.

    The hard thing is to decide when the environment is for the moment hopeless – I.e completely not ready, and when its just difficult. Not easy.

    Agree, of course.

    My point, though is simple: that spiritual place, even sanctuary, simply serves to make the physical struggle possible. In crude terms, it gives that inner strength to a man going against a helicopter gunship……

    Now, the thing is…WHAT is that place, NOW, for a Western man?
    Well….hehe….chatting here isn’t a bad surrogate for the real thing. Long way to go, I guess.

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @mcohen
  432. renfro says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Excuse me if I am missing something obvious but how can I see your 203 files?

    You can’t.

  433. Art says:
    @AaronB

    I definitely don’t think everything rotten in America is the fault of Jews. Rather the opposite – the complete spiritual rot among white Americans makes Jews dominate easily.

    Hmm?

    Chomsky accuses Israel of ‘brazenly’ meddling in US elections

    Renowned American scholar and political activist Noam Chomsky has accused Israel of meddling in US elections, stressing that the Israeli intervention “vastly overwhelms” any efforts allegedly carried out by Russia in 2016.

    “First of all, if you’re interested in foreign interference in our elections, whatever the Russians may have done barely counts or weighs in the balance as compared with what another state does, openly, brazenly and with enormous support,” Chomsky said in an interview with Democracy Now! published on Tuesday

    https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018/07/31/569832/Noam-Chomsky-Israeli-intervention-US-presidential-election

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

  434. Is your investment of time and intellect ever going to pay a dividend?

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  435. Heros says:

    Henry Ford nailed it with this one. Of course Goebbels said similar things. Guess what Jews, we know about the never ending centuries old blood sacrifice of our children.

    The question is how long will jews keep spitting “anti-semite” at us even as they watch their the mass hypnosis scam come crashing down around them, while the goyim openly discuss this swine of a race?

  436. Anon[167] • Disclaimer says:

    Off topic or on, can anyone recommend histories of the Weimar Republic (in English, please). Thank you.

  437. APilgrim says:
    @Per/Norway

    “There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence.”

    Male circumcision for HIV prevention, World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  438. Ace says:
    @anon

    Refreshing. Thank you.

  439. Wally says:
    @APilgrim

    Please point out your alleged “pseudo-science”, Mr. ‘Scientist’.
    Please be specific rather than your usual dodging. We’re waiting.

    You started the personal attacks, please review.

    APilgrim and his “Holocau$t Industry” in court:

    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are to this day, … but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    It’s amazing how easy it is shoot down True Believers of the ’6M’ propaganda & religion, just ask for proof.

  440. APilgrim says:
    @Per/Norway

    ‘Adolescent Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in High Priority Countries: Opportunities for Improvement’, Catherine Lane; Robert C Bailey; Chewe Luo; Nida Parks, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 66, Issue suppl_3, 3 April 2018, Pages S161–S165, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix950, https://academic.oup.com/cid/issue/66/suppl_3

    ‘Scaling Up Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention for Adolescents and Young Adult Men: A Modeling Analysis of Implementation and Impact in Selected Countries’, Emmanuel Njeuhmeli; Marjorie Opuni; Melissa Schnure; Michel Tchuenche; Peter Stegman … Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 66, Issue suppl_3, 3 April 2018, Pages S166–S172, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix969, https://academic.oup.com/cid/issue/66/suppl_3

    So, there’s that.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Kratoklastes
  441. @APilgrim

    This is a highly misleading statement as Stalin did not turn against the Jewish faction of the Party until the late 30’s (the Purges are best understood as a reaction against an essentially Jewish mafia), by which time this faction had wrought bloodthirsty terror. Stalin was obviously no angel, but one shudders to think of the horrors that would have been unleashed had Trotsky assumed control.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  442. Mulegino1 says:
    @APilgrim

    Yes, and “we” also killed more innocent European civilians, raped more women and ruined and wrecked more precious cultural landmarks than the Germans ever did. What Europe underwent was not “liberation” but outright destruction and rebirth as a US or Soviet satrapy. In the long run, the Soviet occupation was less deadly than “our” own because it did not result in the destruction of its subjects culture and spirituality- quite the contrary. I daresay that had our soldiers known beforehand the future fate of their European motherland as a modern day Sodom overrun by criminal third world scoria they would have turned the boats back at Normandy.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  443. AaronB says:
    @peterAUS

    I hear.

    I don’t really accept the dichotomy between collective effort and individual spiritual effort – in most traditions, the hermit who goes into the wilderness to pray extends his influence throughout the world. He also serves as a living nonverbal example of the true ends of life. If everything is truly connected, then no action is truly individual.

    Isolation has always been seen as a legitimate spiritual choice, and as having effects in the unseen web that connects us all.

    Of course, when social conditions are propitious, some social contact can be healthy – and hermits always used to receive guests and visitors and play some role in society, often coming into towns for brief periods.

    So leaving the larger society isn’t abandonment of the world provided one believes in the connectedness of everything – and can even help someone better realize the connectedness of everything.

    So even under the most favourable social conditions solitude is a legitimate spiritual choice and a salutary example to all – it demonstrates the futility of the pursuit of status and wealth, and the petty strife most of us spend our days embroiled in.

    So you are certainly correct that solitude needs to be part of an effort to save humanity as a whole, and has been understood this way in most traditions – and one crucial way it does this is by keeping alive and nurturing values in dark times, which can then spread again when things get better. But that’s not the only way – it is also intrinsically beneficial on its own terms, as an example to others, as an influence on the energy net that connects us all, and as providing necessary respite from the petty strife of ordinary life so that spirituality can grow and develop.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  444. iffen says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    General Philip Sheridan was born of Irish parents and Generals James Shields and Robert Nugent were both Irish-born. With over 150,000 native Irish in uniform and countless thousands of Irish descent, the Irish fought their way to recognition in the United States through their service in the Civil War.

    https://www.nps.gov/articles/irish-soldiers-in-the-union-army.htm

    Nearly 180,000 free black men and escaped slaves served in the Union Army during the Civil War.

    http://www.crf-usa.org/black-history-month/black-troops-in-union-blue

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  445. Mulegino1 says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    You’re 100 percent correct. An interesting book on this subject is “Stalin’s Enduring Legacy” by Kerry Bolton. Bolton does not excuse Stalin’s brutality, but he points out exactly what you wrote. Stalin was a thousand times preferable to Trotsky and the other vicious Jewish Bolsheviks.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  446. In May of 1924 College students Nathan Freudenthal Leopold Jr. and Richard Albert Loeb murdered 14-year-old Robert Franks . All three were neighbors, sons of wealthy Jewish businessmen living in a very affluent Jewish suburb of Chicago. Upon arrest Leopold and Loeb confessed to the murder claiming that reading Nietzsche had turned them into thrill killers. More likely reading the Talmud had inspired them to murder Robert Franks after his Jewish parents had converted to being Jehovah Witnesses. This may be a better explanation for Jewish cohesiveness.

  447. @hyperbola

    Given her background, Hodge is not above scrutiny.

    I agree entirely – which makes it all the more foolish when some people stoop to accusing her of “loyalty to Israel”. Her actual vices are even more dangerous and revolting, and reminding the public of these would be a much more effective weapon for those who wish to reduce her political influence.

  448. @Skeptikal

    The PDF of the same text is much easier to read, and includes figures:

    https://archive.org/download/Solzhenitsyn200YearsTogether/Solzhenitsyn-200%20Years%20Together.pdf

    Some chapters are missing. This is one of the “samizdat” versions.

    The fragment (on Scribd) that I linked to appears to be the proofs of a chapter of “200 Years Together”, that had been selected for inclusion in an anthology.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  449. Anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:
    @bjondo

    They don’t care if it’s fiction. The strangest thing about jews is they will happily acknowledge that their Talmud and Torah are human creations, and they may be merely legends and may contain errors. But it doesn’t matter. They see even the errors and legends as having some divine guidance.

    Not technically being a descendant of the Middle East is not a problem. The jewish people, through their actions create the will of god on earth, even if they are wrong or driven by ‘erroneous’ dogma. The jewish people ARE god. Their collective action is the will of god manifested.

  450. notanon says:
    @Johnj

    no population has a monopoly of sin – however i think the issue here is how one set of sins are hidden and another set magnified as a method of manipulation

  451. Ivan says:
    @jilles dykstra

    R.V. Jones book reads like a thriller. It is a uniquely revelatory book. It was pretty clear that the scientific mandarins of the UK, Lord Tizard and PMS Blunkett among others were against the bombing of civilians for many reasons, with one of the most pertinent being that it would be ineffective and counterproductive as Sir Solly Zuckermann said. In my youth when I read of Nazi atrocities I was filled with rage, but I now understand that one has to control that rage to contribute anything useful in the long run. The civilians in Germany were no more independent actors – in the sense of being immune to manipulation – than civilians elsewhere were.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  452. @Abbybwood

    Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!

    Naw, he’s pushing it enough with this stuff. Most people are not ready to accept that, and it draws too much pushback. Gotta start somewhere.

  453. @Dr. Pol

    /pol/ was right again.

    /pol/ is always right.

    The concept of “anti-semitism” is not only a marvelous piece of reified projection, but reflects an entire narrative — a worldview — in one word. If one accepts the validity of this construct, he accepts a narrative frame that demands that any and all conflicts between Jews and other peoples not only can, but must be explained, not by conflicts over territory, resources, ideology, etc., but by the simple “fact” that most non-Jews harbor a psychotic, irrational, insane hatred for the Chosen People. For reasons that have nothing to do with the actions of the Tribe, and everything to do with the psychopathology of the goyim. This is a very convenient explanation for intergroup conflict — for one side, anyway.

    In addition to facilitating the guilting of the goyim in the stereotypically-Jewish “aggressive victim” manner, the “anti-Semitism” canard also helps to enhance/ maintain group cohesion by maintaining / reinforcing Jewish paranoia/ hatred/ supremacism towards outsiders. If the goyim fail to generate “adequate” levels of “anti-Semitism,” it must be manufactured. See the notorious Jewish community center bomb threats, for example. Perpetrated by some evil neon-nazi, no doubt. Nope:

    http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Dual-US-Israeli-citizen-behind-most-JCC-bomb-threat-calls-484990

    To put it another way… what is the prevalence of “anti-Gentilism?” How is it defined? Name a recent incident that was motivated largely by “anti-Gentilism.” There’s no such thing? Why? Hmm…
    You’ve been suckered, goys. A rather ingenious long con.

    • Replies: @Anon
  454. “A few weeks ago an unknown 28-year-old Democratic Socialist named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez scored a stunning upset primary victory over a top House Democrat in New York City, and naturally received a blizzard of media coverage as a result. However, when it came out that she had denounced the Israeli government for its recent massacre of over 140 unarmed Palestinian protesters in Gaza, cries of “anti-Semite” soon appeared, and according to Google there are now over 180,000 such hits combining her name and that harsh accusatory term.”

    That’s just drama (and building her “anti-racist” cred by appearing to stand up for the poor brown people in Palestine), though. She ran away from the “greedy Jewish landlords” guy as fast as she could. She’ll bend the knee to AIPAC when it counts.

    The Forward is much more concerned about the “threat” of the historic American people standing up for their own interests than they are about this mestiza, who escaped her impoverished childhood in the crime-ridden slums of Westchester County to achieve the Puerto Rican dream of controlling how the gibs are dispensed.
    No, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Is Not Bad For The Jews. But 9 GOP Candidates Are

    https://forward.com/opinion/405408/white-nationalist-republican-candidates/

  455. but the obvious explanation was extraordinary Jewish fecundity, which far outstripped that of their Slavic fellow countrymen, and quickly led them to outgrow the available spots in any of their traditional “middleman” occupations,

    Yes. Absolutely. It’s amazing that the population explosion of the Ostjuden in the 1800s is almost completely ignored in most historical analyses, when it was obviously such a critical factor in the history of this period (and well into the 20th century). Incidentally, the TFR of Israeli Jews is currently… 3.16. Higher than Saudi Arabia. Just sayin’

  456. As Lindemann candidly describes the tension between Russia’s very rapidly growing Jewish population and its governing authorities, he cannot avoid mentioning the notorious Jewish reputation for bribery, corruption, and general dishonesty, with numerous figures of all political backgrounds noting that the remarkable Jewish propensity to commit perjury in the courtroom led to severe problems in the effective administration of justice. The eminent American sociologist E.A. Ross, writing in 1913, characterized the regular behavior of Eastern European Jews in very similar terms.

    The exception to lashon hara for legal testimony is commonly understood (by most halakhic authorities) to apply to Jewish courts only.

    Lindemann also notes Disraeli’s focus on the extreme importance of race and racial origins, a central aspect of traditional Jewish religious doctrine.

    In “Coningsby,” he uses the term “Hebrew Arabs” to refer to Jews. Interesting.

  457. utu says:
    @APilgrim

    Gentile circumcision is very import issue for Jews. On one level it is a form of Jewish proselytism. But it is also a part of mimicry strategy to alter the host to render the drop-your-pants test useless. All ‘scientific’ articles about benefits of circumcision stem form Jewish interest. The alleged medical benefits if any are negligible.

    Michael Greenberg of TLS recalled how satisfied and gleeful his father was when as a medical doctor in the US Army he managed to persuade/trick almost the whole battalion to undergo a circumcision.

  458. Ivan says:
    @j2

    Homos and Jews do the double grind on Catholics. Been like this for a while.

  459. Skeptikal says:
    @James N. Kennett

    Thanks. I have bookmarked the pdf to read.
    I notice that a certain Gessen is heavily referenced.

  460. mcohen says:
    @peterAUS

    Have you read todays (thursday) herald sun article by andrew bolt about unity lost to new tribes.curious what you think of it

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  461. @Johnny Rottenborough

    The fairly-ready availability of the suppressed English translation of Solzhenitsyn’s second major work, presents a really interesting phenomenon that is often overlooked – namely, that the ‘suppression’ is not aimed at making the work unavailable tout court, but is aimed at making it unavailable to the broad public.

    That way, the public discourse is kept under control – and anybody who deviates from the Overton Window will have a hard time finding fellow-travellers among their run-of-the-mill personal network.

    Enthusiasts can almost always get hold of ‘suppressed’ works, but nobody’s going to see those works in a bookshop as they peruse the shelves (I’m assuming people still do that IRL).

    It is informative that on Amazon, entire categories are suppressed… the books contained in those categories will generally be available for download somewhere. (Whenever I see a work that might interest me, my first port of call is the various internet ‘newsgroups’, as indexed by the likes of NZBIndex.com – and I am rarely disappointed).

  462. Question says:

    @unz

    Whom do you designate as Semite?
    “Descendants” of the mythical Shem. No such real person.
    Even so, the term would include the Arabs also.
    So, anti-Semite is anti-all-others of the same provenance?
    If you feel so intellectual, why do you perpetuate the misnomer?

  463. @APilgrim

    Pfft… I’ll see your poorly-conducted studies that fail to control for any other factor (apart from mutilation of guys’ junk), and raise you as follows:

    Ioannides (2005) Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, PLOS Medicine 2(8): e124

    Angell, M (2009) Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption, New York Review of Books, Jan 15 2009

    [MORE]

    Key quote:

    “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine”

    Horton, R (2015) What is medicine’s 5 sigma?, The Lancet, Vol 385 (April 11, 2015) p1380

    Key quote:

    “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness”

    .
    .
    Let’s leave aside the obvious (ahem) ethnocultural biases underpinning the junk science you cited (although by all means let’s ask: where did the funding for those ‘studies’ come from? Who has an interest in providing fig-leaves for [ritual] male genital mutilation? ).

    Let’s instead concentrate on how fucking ridiculous it is to ‘stump’ for genital mutilation of male babies, justifying it by reference to a lifestyle disease that affects under 0.5% of the population (and far less than that, outside of populations that can be readily identified as at-risk without regard to the state of their prepuce).

    Seriously – folks should stop trying to pretend that there is the least scintilla of valid scientific evidence for population-wide health benefits from cock-mutilation that are significantly greater than those from “condom use plus washing your cock properly“.

    What you’re actually saying when you try to run that shibboleth, is

    “We’re not saying that we should sacrifice our male kids’ cock-ends to Yahweh … not a bit of it… it’s just that, erm, if we don’t mutilate our baby boys, they’ll all get HIV. See? This impossible-to-verify study in Africa proves it.”

    Yeah, and Yakob Wilkomerski was a documentarian.

    Seriously – the whole “some folks just make shit up” schtick is pretty transparent – but I guess the thing is, it only has to work at the median, amirite?

  464. Seraphim says:
    @Johnj

    The witches of yore were not the ‘Wicca’ freaking stupid clownesses of today. They were real practitioners of casting spells to ‘magically’ kill, maim, defraud people, seduce women to sex against their will or induce impotence in men. All of these were crimes incurring the death penalty in the codes of law of all peoples from the remotest antiquity.

  465. @Beefcake the Mighty

    It already has for me and mine. Aren’t you ashamed when I point out that you are preferring to show your pettifogging nastiness rather than show an enthusiastic interest in getting the benefit of what seems to be a great deal of interesting research by renfro.

    • Troll: L.K
    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  466. Heros says:
    @Heros

    Another Spielberg victim comes forward.

    Okay jews, how many dead children, ruined families, and destroyed lives will it take? How long will you cover up the blood sacrifices of your idol, the hagiographer of the sacred cult of holohoax, Spielberg?

    It is important to recognize that jew filth like Spielberg and Weinstein have been hiring Mossad offshoot organizations like Cube to intimidate victims, murder victims and cover up their disgusting existence as smorotzer. These bloody coverups go back centuries, and are the origin of the criminal Christian hating organizations Bnai Brith, ADL and SPLC. Jews covering up the sadistic murders by other jews.

    And that is the real point here, this holohoax narrative was created by the worst jews among you, those who would ritually torture and murder children out of hatred for Christians. Jews don’t care, its only goyim. All you jews, ALL OF YOU, as long as you cling to jew lies and deny what your people have done to the entire planet for thousands of years, are covering for these child murders just as your filthy collective of psychopaths has done for centuries.

    Thats the true jew credo: “Never snitch, never admit the truth, just keep blaming your victims for being anti-semites”.

    https://twitter.com/the_mikeknapp/status/1024885705380700160

    Hey jews, guess what, theres MORE!

    https://forward.com/news/national/407147/popular-minneapolis-rabbi-charged-in-underage-sex-sting/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Main

    I love the Rabbi’s confession:

    ““I sort of deserve it,” Cohen said unprompted while being taken to the local police department”

    Of course, he only “sort of deserves” it because he only got caught molesting Christians.

    What a race of swine.

  467. Faraway says:

    Speaking of soap and lampshades, here is another collector piece. It is the opening sentences of a book by renowned professor Simon Baron-Cohen, The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty published in 2011 by Basic Books:

    “When I was seven years old, my father told me the Nazis had turned Jews into lampshades. Just one of those comments that you hear once, and the thought never goes away. To a child’s mind (even to an adult’s) these two types of things just don’t belong together. He also told me the Nazis turned Jews into bars of soap. It sounds so unbelievable, yet it is actually true. I knew our family was Jewish, so this image of turning people into objects felt a bit close to home. My father also told me about one of his former girlfriends, Ruth Goldblatt, whose mother had survived a concentration camp. He had been introduced to the mother and was shocked to discover that her hands were reversed. Nazi scientists had severed Mrs. Goldblatt’s hands, switched them around, and sewn them on again so that if she put her hands out palms down, her thumbs were on the outside and her little fingers were on the inside. Just one of the many ‘experiments’ they had conducted. I realized there was a paradox at the heart of human nature—people could objectify others—that my young mind was not yet ready to figure out. […] Today, almost half a century after my father’s revelations to me about the extremes of human behavior, my mind is still exercised by the same, single question: How can we understand human cruelty?”

    This passage is from the kindle édition (108-150), and can also be read on the online edition on archive.org , or by “looking inside” on Amazon.com the Penguin edition retitled Zero Degrees of Empathy. But, as I had a hard time believing what I read, I also “looked inside” the new 2012 edition by Basic Books, and had the surprise to see that the author has modified this passage, deleting the sentence “it sounds so unbelievable, yet it is actually true”, and requalifying the soap and lampshade stories as “rumors”. Yet he sticks to his belief in the surgical miracle of the reversed hands.
    Baron-Cohen, by the way, is the cousin of “comic” actor Sacha Baron Cohen, whether that is relevant or not.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  468. Anon[386] • Disclaimer says:
    @James Forrestal

    ‘Antisemitism’ is an associative and diagnostic than merely descriptive term.

    For example, most ‘anti-something’ is merely descriptive. ‘Anti-French’ means you’re anti-French, ‘anti-Iranian’ means you’re anti-Iranian, and ‘anti-Japanese’ means you’re anti-Japanese. They merely describe your antipathy without judgement.
    In contrast, ‘antisemitic’ associates you with virulent Nazis and diagnoses you as sick in the head because of your antipathy. So, ‘antisemitic’, unlike ‘anti-most-things’, is an accusation than merely a description. Also, as it applies not only to antipathy but even to moderate criticism or lack of enthusiasm for Jews, ‘antisemitism’ is lobbed at anyone who refuses to obey and serve Jews.

    For reasons that have nothing to do with the actions of the Tribe, and everything to do with the psychopathology of the goyim.

    True, but there have been extreme and psychotic forms of anti-Jewish hatred. As they were seen as the Outsider, they could be scapegoated by the community during hard times. All groups can fall into such mindset, Jews too. Today, Jews are ‘antisemitic’ about Russia, foaming at the mouth as they cook up the most insane lies about Russia meddling. There have been bouts of such extreme anti-Jewish feelings because (1) Jews were outsiders (2) Jews were involved in professions that made them richer than others (3) Jews were of another religion, esp one associated with death of Christ. For sure, the Nazis took anti-Jewishism to pathological success, lending credence for all time that anti-Jewish feelings can go totally off the rail.
    But all this hunt for any anti-Jewish view or stance as ‘rabid and virulent antisemitism’ has blinded many Jews to their own pathology of paranoia and hatred.

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
    , @anon
    , @utu
  469. @Ivan

    These Nazi atrocities disappeared with me the more I read about them.
    This does not mean that there were none, but if the Nazi atrocities were more or bigger than the allied ones, I wonder.
    Vincent Reynouard, ‘Die Wahrheit über Oradour, Rekonstruktion und Forschungsbericht eines Franzosen, Was geschah am 10. Juni 1944 wirklich ?’, Stegen am Ammersee, 2005 (Le Massacre d’Oradour, Antwerpen 1997)
    Oradour sur Glane is the French Auschwitz tourist attraction, Germans are accused of having killed almost all inhabitants of a small village, a few hundred, at the end of 1944.
    The book argues, convincingly in my opinion, that there was no massacre at all.
    De Gaulle’s Free French had stockpiled ammo and explosives on the roof of a church, when the Germans had brought women and children into the church, for their safety, while searching the village for a kidnapped German officer, somehow there was a huge explosion on top of the church roof, hurling big stones downward.
    But, the writer was condemned to two years in jail, his archive was seized, and the records of the 1953 Oradour trial are secret until 2053.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  470. @anarchyst

    Never, or with the next jewish catastrophe

  471. @Skeptikal

    Simply not true.
    Only in later life did Richard Feynman find out that his parents were, or had been, jews.
    Many jews after immigration into the USA seem to have done the same, hiding that they were jews.
    ⦁ Jagdish Mehra, ‘The Beat of a Different Drum, The Life and Science of Richard Feynman’, Oxford 1994

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  472. @Heros

    I knew quite well, suppose both of them died, two Dutch university professors, one of them later a Nobel Prize winner, both jews, quite decent men.
    One of them a member of Een Ander Joods Geluid, the Dutch jewish pro Palestinian organisation.

    • Replies: @Heros
  473. @Faraway

    It is easy to see why he could honestly “stick[s] to” the story of the reversed hands while being scrupulous in his revisions. To start with there is no biological problem about getting a person’s own tissue to reconnect and he would know of cases where there had even been limb or face grafts from other people. Then it seems quite possible that he quizzed his father closely and anyway was inclined to believe him on matters he spoke of first hand.

  474. @CanSpeccy

    I’ve never heard anything like your criticisms of Singapore. To the contrary. Where do you get it from?

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  475. @jilles dykstra

    You have raised the possibility of countering any impression that you are a crank. I have just read the Wikipedia entry on Oradur-sur- Glanes and you really need to try editing it and reporting back on what that leads to. You don’t need to try and remove reference to all the distinguished Germans who accept the seriously unforgiveable atrocity story (which is by no means confined to the church). You don’t need to delete anything. Just add to the long list of books and films about or based on the 1944 events mention of the book you cited, a description of its contents and the fate of the author. It doesn’t even get a mention under a typical heading like Controversy.

    What btw was the charge against the author? I was unaware that writing a different version of military events in Frsnce could be treated as criminal. Presumably there was something more.

  476. nagra says:
    @APilgrim

    it is essential for nation to have literature in its own language
    otherwise such nation can’t claim its nationality
    so there is no palestinian language

    (my question was for Druid guy
    but thank you for the answer : )

  477. Skeptikal says:
    @jilles dykstra

    What is “simply not true.””?
    And what does my post have to do with Feynman?

  478. Skeptikal says:
    @APilgrim

    “”“There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. ”

    Why the emphasis on “heterosexually”?
    How much HIV infection is acquired heterosexually?
    What is the point of this study?
    Seems to have some kind of subtext, i.e., we are more concerned with heteros, not just gays.
    Or did they find that circumcision did nothing to reduce homosexual acquisition of infection?

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  479. Heros says:
    @jilles dykstra

    What did these jews have to say about the holohoax? About blood sacrifice? About Irgun, Haganah, about Hamburg and Dresden. What did they say about jews opening the gates to muslims in both Constantinople and Granada? What about the Protocols and Coudenhove-Kalergi? What about the holomort and the Armenian Genocide? What about their murder of the Tsar and theft of Russia? What about their world wars for Israel?

    Most of all, would they be willing to denounce investigate world jewery for the ongoing genocide of Christian babies?

    The answer is that these jews would deflect, lie and call you and me “anti-semite”. If you claim they wouldn’t, then I will call you a liar.

    Calling out the jewish genocide of Palestine and the Palestinians is merely the first step, like an alcoholic making it through the night without a drink.

  480. Mulegino1 says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Thank you- actually I had not read that article, but it was very informative.

    The usual suspects need their “monsters” to hide behind and use as a lightning rod to conceal their own horrendous crimes. A USSR under Trotsky would have made Stalin’s rule look like a picnic in the park.

  481. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    The “Oradour-sur-Glane massacre”? Been there, debunked that, see:

    Persecution in France for “The Waffen-SS: Innocent at Oradour” ‘
    By Vincent Reynouard: https://codoh.com/library/document/631/?lang=en
    and:
    France: New evidence prompts investigation (Oradour-sur-Glane: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7603

    And lots, lots more here: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=oradour

    you said:
    “the distinguished Germans who accept the seriously unforgiveable atrocity story ”

    You obviously mean the Germans that would be arrested if they did not “accept” the propaganda.

    You referred to Zionist dominated Wikipedia, LOL:
    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course : http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189
    How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet: http://www.unz.com/article/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/?highlight=wikipedia

    Do better next time.

    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  482. @Wizard of Oz

    The charge against the author, no idea.
    The problem of course was that De Gaulle’s Free French could not be the perpetrators.
    That Germans accepted the story, of course, in the French trial the alleged German perpetrators got away with very light sentences, they confessed.
    The mentioned book could not even be published in Germany, just in Austria ‘for study purposes’.
    I suppose in this way Austrian censorship can be circumvented.
    What should make you realise that indeed there was much more to the official version is that in 1953 it was decided that the trial records would not be accessible for a hundred years.
    I’ve never been in de present tourist attraction, but it seems that the repair of the roof of the church is clearly visible.
    Anyone who asks questions is not answered.
    Wonder if you know if it all began with the silly kidnapping and hanging of a German officer.
    And there is indeed more to it, the German SS troops accused of the atrocity arre accused of also having perpetrated an atrocity in Tulle, the French town where former French president Hollande was mayor.
    He each year goes there the remember another atrocity that never happened.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  483. @Anon

    True, but there have been extreme and psychotic forms of anti-Jewish hatred.

    Oh? Give an example of an “extreme and psychotic form” of Jewish anti-Gentile hatred, then. Why is there no word for this? Alternatively, what is “semitism?” “Anti-semitism” is not merely a label for a self-evident “thing” that exists independently in the real world. It is an inextricable part of an entire (artificially-constructed) narrative. It serves as a trigger to evoke a false frame of reality. It’s a rhetorical trick — word magic. See also “racism.”

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    , @Seraphim
  484. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB

    Well….don’t disagree overall.

    With the below, agree:

    So even under the most favourable social conditions solitude is a legitimate spiritual choice and a salutary example to all – it demonstrates the futility of the pursuit of status and wealth, and the petty strife most of us spend our days embroiled in.

    and

    So you are certainly correct that solitude needs to be part of an effort to save humanity as a whole, and has been understood this way in most traditions – and one crucial way it does this is by keeping alive and nurturing values in dark times, which can then spread again when things get better.

    with

    ….and as providing necessary respite from the petty strife of ordinary life so that spirituality can grow and develop.

    One thing, though:
    The “hermit” would be well advised to keep his eye on his environment, close and wide. He’ll also have to have (contingency) plans to survive, evade and escape should the “bad” guys come for him. From an opportunist criminal to organized state repression.

    I am aware that this “new world” is a new thing for Americans and they struggle to find their way around it.
    For Europeans, for example, Eastern in particular, it’s much easier.

    As I keep mentioning (without much success, of course) one only needs to take a look as how nationalists managed all that under Communism.

  485. @Wizard of Oz

    What btw was the charge against the author? I was unaware that writing a different version of military events in Frsnce could be treated as criminal. Presumably there was something more.

    Your gross ignorance, while admittedly rather comical, lacks any magical power to alter reality. Even (((wikipedia))) confesses that Reynouard was convicted and sentenced solely on the charge of citing heretical facts about the alleged “Oradour-sur-Glane massacre.” Read, and learn:

    In 2004, Reynouard was convicted by a French court of crimes under the 1990 Gayssot Act for distributing a pamphlet and videocassette that questioned the Oradour-sur-Glane massacre, in which many French villagers were killed. He was sentenced to 24 months in prison, of which 18 months were suspended.[8]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Reynouard

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  486. @Wally

    I read your first link and it seems reasonable and logical and well written (in translation). The idea that the author could have been sentenced to imprisonment for “approving a war crime” seems as reprehensible as it is absurd on the face of it. So I challenge you too to try and edit Wikipedia to mention the book and trial and see what comes of it.

    • Replies: @Wally
  487. @jilles dykstra

    See my reply to Wally. Seriously, you should try and add a summary and link about the book and trial to the Oradur-sur-Glane Wikipedia entry.

  488. Phil says:
    @Wally

    Wally,
    I am not fully satisfied, but I do believe that deniers have some strong points on their side. Korherr apparently asked for clarification on the telephone about the term ‘special treatment.’ Whether he was given a truthful or adequate answer is open to dispute. The piece by John Weir is partly rhetorical, but provides interesting information about other documents. Some documents do indeed indicate a desire by the Germans to deport large numbers to the east.
    Deniers have strong arguments about the lack of physical evidence for millions of dead bodies. On the other hand, there must of been much resistance to the round-up of Jews, so it seems possible to me that there were thousands of shootings and decentralized burials and/or burnings. However, there also seems to be a strong case for the vast majority of people having been deported from transit camps and to the East. We should hear from Irving in either a revised or more comprehensive way—or else he is left with a highly questionable position.

    • Replies: @Wally
  489. I usually just come here to read, the articles and comments both, to learn. But I have to say now. This is weapons-grade kryptonite self-help material. Mr Unz, Sir, thank you for your efforts to make the world a better place.

  490. peterAUS says:
    @mcohen

    Well, I haven’t. Haven’t got prescription on any MSM paper/media. In fact, don’t read them. Just take a look at the front page of those free to see has anything major happened overnight/yesterday.

    Having said that I’ve seen the “teaser”, so here I go:

    That issue is HUGE. To discuss that, right, we’d need to spend all day talking somewhere, if we are on the same page.

    Australia and NZ are in the same position there as the rest of the Western world. The only positive, especially for Kiwis, is the ocean. But, the elites ruling both countries are the same as those in all the West. Globalists. Enough said.

    The problem is very well known to anyone with common sense. Fixing it is another matter altogether. I don’t think it’s possible at the moment. Things will simply get worse.

    To make it better, or even right, is, IMHO, simple:
    -”controlled immigration”
    And much more important
    -INTEGRATION.

    The later, in this world….impossible. Simply impossible.
    The root of that issue is DEEP and some very smart people described it well, even on this site.

    Will things get better, I don’t know.
    It is possible; how and when, well, have some ideas but no point putting them here.

    Personally, I believe two other options are more likely:
    -Globalized world, organized as current Brasil society
    -Nuclear war, resulting in Mutual Assured Destruction

    We’ll just have to wait and see.

  491. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    The Jewish Problem pops up in the strangest places. In the winter of 1991, at the height of the first gulf war, I asked a right-wing Japanese politician who still wields considerable power in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party to explain the Japanese role in the Middle Eastern conflict. After clearing his throat with some perfunctory remarks about oil supplies and United States-Japan relations, he suddenly stopped midsentence, gave me a shrewd look and said: ”Look, we Japanese aren’t stupid. We saw Henry Kissinger on TV. We know how America operates. We’re perfectly well aware that this war is not about Kuwait. It’s about Jewish interests. It’s all about Israel.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/31/magazine/how-to-talk-about-israel.html

  492. @APilgrim

    Paris after the bad guys invaded:

    Dresden after the good guys attacked:

    Swimming pool at Auschwitz (a “death camp”), with prisoner housing in the background:

    Facilities at the Rhine meadows camp in Sinzig, Germany — one of a number of similar humane internment facilities where German POWs were imprisoned for many months after the war at Eisenhower’s direction.

    Not a “death camp” — right?

    See also — Morgenthau Plan.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  493. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    Earlier this year, Representative James Moran, a Democrat, said that ”if it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this.” In Britain, Tam Dalyell, a longstanding Labor member of Parliament, expressed a similar view. Tony Blair, he opined, was listening too much to a ”cabal” of Jews around President Bush that included Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz; an under secretary of defense, Douglas Feith; Richard Perle, a member of the Defense Policy Board; Elliott Abrams, director of Middle East Affairs in the White House; and the former presidential spokesman Ari Fleischer. ”Those people drive this policy,” Dalyell said.
    Dalyell was ”worried about my country being led up the garden path on a Likudnik-Sharon agenda” by British Jews close to Blair.
    —————-
    Earlier this year, Representative James Moran, a Democrat, said that ”if it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this.” In Britain, Tam Dalyell, a longstanding Labor member of Parliament, expressed a similar view. Tony Blair, he opined, was listening too much to a ”cabal” of Jews around President Bush that included Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz; an under secretary of defense, Douglas Feith; Richard Perle, a member of the Defense Policy Board; Elliott Abrams, director of Middle East Affairs in the White House; and the former presidential spokesman Ari Fleischer. ”Those people drive this policy,” Dalyell said.
    Dalyell was ”worried about my country being led up the garden path on a Likudnik-Sharon agenda” by British Jews close to Blair.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/31/magazine/how-to-talk-about-israel.html

    The way , this war has played out, the way Oslo has been shredded, the way Iran deal has been gutted, the way Blair spoke in Bush’s ranch and took money form and awards from Israel, the way attacks on Lebanon and Syria have been allowed and helped , the way Libya have been made a failed country, the way billions have been poured on Israel, the way dissent against war has been suppressed, the way Corbyn was attacked prove one thing – only one thing that is the author was entirely wrong .Moran Japanense and British minister are and were correct.

  494. @Druid

    Better late than never…

    Lest I leave you with the erroneous impression of Jains of India, let me say poignantly that one could be assessing it incorrectly, thus it should be verified independently… caveat emptor!

    India is the bloodsuckers’ paradise and thus being ‘BLESSED’ with numerous mercantile minorities, since the Middle Ages and of all those, the unctuous Jain, should be placed atop the pyramid for his sheer chutzpah in committing the most fraudulent financial crimes equalling that of Bernie Madoff, Mark Rich, Ivan Boesky et al in India.

    And he operates under the Hindu umbrellas when acting illicitly, e.g the shyster Rajneesh of 50 plus Rolls Royce fame in Oregon (people think he was a Hindu). His imprimatur is well noted in India but remains obscured outside.

    He looks just like the Hindu majority, and talks like them for the most part expect that he may adopt a special vocabulary akin to Ashkenazi Jews mixing Yiddish to confuse the Pollack in order to gain favorable advantage.

    He eats like the Hindu vegetarians but once again, he is special in that regard as well. He is a vegan who also abhors all things yielding its offspring underground, e.g. peanuts, potatoes, onions etc. He disdains garlic to keep his libido in control but makes up for it in settling his usurious position in non-bank loans by eagerly soliciting sexual favors from his desperate debtors, thus n the face of the claims of extraordinary piety, he is lecherous at best.

    He dresses, for the most part, like a typical Hindu native but not unlike his diet, there are idiosyncrasies native to Rajasthan, the desert state.

    His faith has the semblance and trappings of Sanatana Dharma (the Hindu faith) but he is godless, not unlike Buddhist, in that his creed has no deity thus Mammon is the god;.

    The Hindu place of worship is called Mandir while his is called Derasar and is off limits to non-Jains. There are countless little other things, including skyclad priests (nude) who roam all over the land and a rat temple for which the Hindu is caricatured as well as a bird hospital or two to ease his conscious from the violence (Himsa) he inflicts upon debt ridden farmers and the downtrodden, while his much touted practice of nonviolence (Ahimsa) is strictly for the animals. And he builds the fanciest marble temples on the backs of the hoi polloi.

    He is like the Jew in many a respect save his deity-absent creed. He is the businessman of India; he controls the securities business, the stock market, the media, wholesale and retail,the new industries and Bollywood. He controls small carat diamond business and generally keeps a wary eye on Chasids, his competitors and collaborators in the gem trade. His income puts him in another level altogether and like the Jews he has his share of poorer brethren but his charity is largely confined to helping his own.

    He doesn’t like menial work and prefers to do mentally challenging work. He is slow to anger and willing to wait his turn for either a great opportunity or a greater revenge. He is very clannish and doesn’t allow the Indian goy into his clique so readily.

    He is smart and discreet and a teetotaler. He is gifted in his ability to do math and his children are making a huge difference to arts and sciences. He has run the Deutsche Bank and he is a right hand man of Warren Buffett.

    He rarely marries the non-Jains but like a Jew, he is fun to know on that rear chance he lets you peak into his milieu but would shun you just as easily. He is a bundle of contradictions to say the least and Hindus are stuck with him come hell or high water!

    I Hope it helps to crack open the door just a bit…

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  495. @Dagon Shield

    Jains really made their money in the Arab Gulf. People overlook how much oil money built parts of India.

  496. utu says:
    @Anon

    But all this hunt for any anti-Jewish view or stance as ‘rabid and virulent antisemitism’ has blinded many Jews to their own pathology of paranoia and hatred.

    The reason anti-semitism for Jews is not just a descriptive anti-Jewishness is because it is a projection. The pathology and paranoia is Jewish which is then projected on gentiles.

  497. Skeptikal says:
    @Skeptikal

    The dynamic that currently obtains between the Israelis and the Palestinians they have trapped/captured is the same as that of a parent who hits a child and then, when the child cries, hits the child again to punish him/her for crying/screaming.

    I think most sane observers would characterize such behavior of a parent as sadistic.
    And there are parents who are sadistic in this way, and in this way drive their children crazy.

    Why can’t we come out and state it clearly: The Jewish State is not only an apartheid state; it is a sadistic state. It has institutionalized sadism and taught the populace,the children, that sadistic behavior is healthy. The Jewish state represents a total inversion of very basic concepts.

    The rest of the world looks on and does nothing to rescue both the victims and the victimizers from this unholy cycle of sadism. Because I think we can agree that sadism is a major psychosis. The Israelis and their supporters are sick sick sick.

    It is a miracle that the Palestinians are still spiritually able to fight back at all—have not been psychologically crushed by the unremitting sadism.

    I think it is time to start calling this Israeli sociopathy by its true name, SADISM.

  498. Skeptikal says:
    @James Forrestal

    ” It serves as a trigger to evoke a false frame of reality. ”

    Exactly. it frames reality, and any discussion, as a manachean struggle of the victimized Jews against the always Jew-hating Goyim. The Jews take ZERO responsibility for any of the negative behaviors they have brought on themselves. NONE. They are like history’s children.
    We need a new frame.
    That is why I usggest “anti-Judaism.”
    There are plenty of reasons to be annoyed at Jews in general, specific groups of Jews, or specific individual Jews—and especially to actually hate Zionists. It is practically a moral imperative to hate zionists and all they stand for.

    Back in the thirties, when it came to organizing labor to stand up for itself, the demand was: “Which side are you on?” You couldn’t be on both sides; you had to choose. Let’s challenge American Jews to come out and clarify: “Which side are you on?” The side of the Zionists or the side of their victims?

    • Replies: @utu
  499. mcohen says:

    Hi ron
    These essays you write make me feel bad about being a jew.i get pretty anger reading the comments and i wonder why you persist with these continuous attacks on judaism.

    • Replies: @Heros
    , @Anon
    , @L.K
  500. utu says:
    @Skeptikal

    That is why I suggest “anti-Judaism.”

    (((They))) have already taken care of it.

    https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/03/20/imaginary-jews/
    Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition by David Nirenberg
    The book is not about Jews at all or, at least, not about real Jews; it deals extensively and almost exclusively with imaginary Jews.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  501. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    I’ve never heard anything like your criticisms of Singapore. To the contrary. Where do you get it from?

    Paul Theroux. I think the book was: Ghost Train to the Eastern Star: On the Tracks of the Great Railway Bazaar

  502. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Felix-Culpa

    Old Testament Jews did follow morality of which the Decalogue still applies. Talmudic Jews are not their theological descendants; Catholics are. Talmudic Judaism is a rejection of the Old Testament. It is Logos-rejecting social revolution masquerading as religion.

    See E. Michael Jones’ The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History for over one thousand pages of details.

    I have not read the Talmud which appears to be of almost intolerable length: An English edition offered at Amazon, for example, comes in 20 volumes. But from quotes I have read, it seems that the Jews have a lot to answer for and owe their neighbors an apology for the horrible things that the Talmud says about them. Instead, however, here in Canada, the Quebec government, and perhaps others, subsidizes Talmudic schools, which seems truly weird.

    • Replies: @Felix-Culpa
  503. Seraphim says:
    @James Forrestal

    In its proper sense “a Semitism is a grammatical or syntactical behaviour in a language which reveals that the influence of a Semitic language is present. The most common example is the influence of Aramaic on some texts written in Jewish Koine Greek”.
    Like all ‘-isms’, semitism is a participle ‘ a word formed from a verb and used as an adjective or a noun. To semitize, or semiticize: to make Semitic.

    “The German word ‘antisemitisch’ was first used in 1860 by the Austrian Jewish scholar Moritz Steinschneider (1816–1907) in the phrase ‘antisemitische Vorurteile’ (antisemitic prejudices). Steinschneider used this phrase to characterise the French philosopher Ernest Renan’s false ideas about how “Semitic races” were inferior to “Aryan races”, and then abused in order to hide the specific anti-Judaism.

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  504. Skeptikal says:
    @utu

    What are imaginary Jews?
    Jews as others think they are?

  505. UnzReader says:
    @AaronB

    AaronB, your observations are always insightful and interesting. I wonder if you believe in freewill at all, even in “insignificant” matters because time and sequence are all important and such trivial events set up the really big ones in our lives.

    “Human beings, in their thinking, feeling and acting are not free but as causally bound as the stars in their motions.” – Albert Einstein.

    I look forward to your response.

    UR

    • Replies: @AaronB
    , @Heros
  506. Skeptikal says:
    @fnn

    Funny!
    What is the Brown Scare?

  507. @CanSpeccy

    Usury and its concentration of wealth into their hands explains all.
    That and the Québécois kicking over the traces the of the Faith.
    Distinct society? More like extinct.