The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
American Pravda: The Nature of Anti-Semitism
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_26002846

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I recently published a couple of long essays, and although they primarily focused on other matters, the subject of anti-Semitism was a strong secondary theme. In that regard, I mentioned my shock at discovering a dozen or more years ago that several of the most self-evidently absurd elements of anti-Semitic lunacy, which I had always dismissed without consideration, were probably correct. It does seem likely that a significant number of traditionally-religious Jews did indeed occasionally commit the ritual murder of Christian children in order to use their blood in certain religious ceremonies, and also that powerful Jewish international bankers did play a large role in financing the establishment of Bolshevik Russia.

When one discovers that matters of such enormous moment not only apparently occurred but that they had been successfully excluded from nearly all of our histories and media coverage for most of the last one hundred years, the implications take some time to properly digest. If the most extreme “anti-Semitic canards” were probably true, then surely the whole notion of anti-Semitism warrants a careful reexamination.

All of us obtain our knowledge of the world by two different channels. Some things we discover from our own personal experiences and the direct evidence of our senses, but most information comes to us via external sources such as books and the media, and a crisis may develop when we discover that these two pathways are in sharp conflict. The official media of the old USSR used to endlessly trumpet the tremendous achievements of its collectivized agricultural system, but when citizens noticed that there was never any meat in their shops, “Pravda” became a watchword for “Lies” rather than “Truth.”

Now consider the notion of “anti-Semitism.” Google searches for that word and its close variants reveal over 24 million hits, and over the years I’m sure I’ve seen that term tens of thousands of times in my books and newspapers, and heard it endlessly reported in my electronic media and entertainment. But thinking it over, I’m not sure that I can ever recall a single real-life instance I’ve personally encountered, nor have I heard of almost any such cases from my friends or acquaintances. Indeed, the only persons I’ve ever come across making such claims were individuals who bore unmistakable signs of serious psychological imbalance. When the daily newspapers are brimming with lurid tales of hideous demons walking among us and attacking people on every street corner, but you yourself have never actually seen one, you may gradually grow suspicious.

Indeed, over the years some of my own research has uncovered a sharp contrast between image and reality. As recently as the late 1990s, leading mainstream media outlets such as The New York Times were still denouncing a top Ivy League school such as Princeton for the supposed anti-Semitism of its college admissions policy, but a few years ago when I carefully investigated that issue in quantitative terms for my lengthy Meritocracy analysis I was very surprised to reach a polar-opposite conclusion. According to the best available evidence, white Gentiles were over 90% less likely to be enrolled at Harvard and the other Ivies than were Jews of similar academic performance, a truly remarkable finding. If the situation had been reversed and Jews were 90% less likely to be found at Harvard than seemed warranted by their test scores, surely that fact would be endlessly cited as the absolute smoking-gun proof of horrendous anti-Semitism in present-day America.

It has also become apparent that a considerable fraction of what passes for “anti-Semitism” these days seems to stretch that term beyond all recognition. A few weeks ago an unknown 28-year-old Democratic Socialist named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez scored a stunning upset primary victory over a top House Democrat in New York City, and naturally received a blizzard of media coverage as a result. However, when it came out that she had denounced the Israeli government for its recent massacre of over 140 unarmed Palestinian protesters in Gaza, cries of “anti-Semite” soon appeared, and according to Google there are now over 180,000 such hits combining her name and that harsh accusatory term. Similarly, just a few days ago the New York Times ran a major story reporting that all of Britain’s Jewish newspapers had issued an “unprecedented” denunciation of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, describing it as an “existential threat” to the Jewish community for the anti-Semitism it was fostering; but this apparently amounted to nothing more than its willingness to sharply criticize the Israeli government for its long mistreatment of the Palestinians.

ORDER IT NOW

One plausible explanation of the strange contrast between media coverage and reality might be that anti-Semitism once did loom very large in real life, but dissipated many decades ago, while the organizations and activists focused on detecting and combating that pernicious problem have remained in place, generating public attention based on smaller and smaller issues, with the zealous Jewish activists of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) representing a perfect example of this situation. As an even more striking illustration, the Second World War ended over seventy years ago, but what historian Norman Finkelstein has so aptly labeled “the Holocaust Industry” has grown ever larger and more entrenched in our academic and media worlds so that scarcely a day passes without one or more articles relating to that topic appearing in my major morning newspapers. Given this situation, a serious exploration of the true nature of anti-Semitism should probably avoid the mere media phantoms of today and focus on the past, when the condition might still have been widespread in daily life.

Many observers have pointed to the aftermath of the Second World War as marking a huge watershed in the public acceptability of anti-Semitism both in America and Europe, so perhaps a proper appraisal of that cultural phenomenon should focus on the years before that global conflict. However, the overwhelming role of Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution and other bloody Communist seizures of power quite naturally made them objects of considerable fear and hatred throughout the inter-war years, so the safest course might be to push that boundary back a little further and confine our attention to the period prior to the outbreak of the First World War. The pogroms in Czarist Russia, the Dreyfus Affair in France, and the lynching of Leo Frank in the American South come to mind as some of the most famous examples from that period.

 

ORDER IT NOW

In 1991 Cambridge University Press published The Jew Accused by Albert Lindemann, a noted scholar of European ideological movements, and his book focused on exactly that era and those sorts of incidents. Although the text is quite short, running less than 300 pages, Lindemann built his discussion upon a huge foundation of secondary literature, with his footnotes drawn from the 200 works included in his extensive bibliography. As far as I could tell, he seems a very scrupulous scholar, generally providing the multiple, often conflicting accounts of a given incident, and coming to his own conclusions with considerable hesitation.

This approach is certainly demonstrated in the first of his major cases, the notorious Dreyfus affair of late 19th century France, probably one of history’s most famous anti-Semitic incidents. Although he concludes that Captain Alfred Dreyfus was very likely innocent of the charge of espionage, he notes the seemingly strong evidence that initially led to his arrest and conviction and finds—contrary to myth-making by numerous later writers—absolutely no indications that his Jewish origins played any role whatsoever in his predicament.

However, he does note some of the underlying social context to this fierce political battle. Although only one Frenchman in a thousand was Jewish, just a few years earlier a group of Jews had been the leading culprits behind several huge financial scandals that impoverished large numbers of small investors, and the swindlers afterward escaped any punishment by means of political influence and bribery. Given this history, much of the outrage of the anti-Dreyfusards probably arose from their fears that a Jewish military spy from a very wealthy family might be able to walk free using similar tactics, and the public claims that Dreyfus’s brother was offering enormous bribes to win his brother’s release certainly strengthened this concern.

Lindemann’s discussion of the 1913 Leo Frank Affair, in which a wealthy Northern Jew working in Atlanta was accused of sexually-assaulting and murdering a young girl, is even more interesting. Once again, he notes that contrary to the traditional narrative, there seems absolutely no hint that Frank’s Jewish background played any role in his arrest or conviction. Indeed, at his trial it was instead his very highly-paid defense attorneys who unsuccessfully sought to “play the race card” with the jurors by crudely attempting to deflect suspicion upon a local black worker by means of racially-charged invective.

Although Lindemann regards Frank as probably innocent, my own reading of the evidence he presents suggests the overwhelming likelihood of his guilt. Meanwhile, it seems undeniable that the outpouring of popular anger against Frank was produced by the vast ocean of outside Jewish money—at least $15 million or more in present-day dollars—that was committed to the legal efforts to save the life of someone widely regarded as a brutal murderer. There are strong suggestions that far more improper means were also employed, including bribery and influence-peddling, so that after Frank was convicted by a jury of his peers and thirteen separate legal appeals were denied, a governor with strong personal ties to the defense lawyers and Jewish interests chose to spare Frank’s life a few months before leaving office. Under these circumstances, the lynch-mob that hung Frank was viewed by the community as merely enforcing his official death sentence by extra-judicial means.

I also discovered that the leading figures in the anti-Frank movement had views far nuanced than I had expected. For example, populist writer Tom Watson had previously been a strong defender of Jewish anarchist Emma Goldman, while ferociously denouncing the Rockefellers, Morgans, and Goulds as the “true destroyers” of Jeffersonian democracy, so his outrage that Frank might escape punishment for murder seemed motivated by the extreme wealth of Frank’s family and his supporters rather than any pre-existing anti-Semitic sentiments.

The unmistakable conclusion of Lindemann’s analysis is that if the defendants in both the Dreyfus and Frank cases had not been Jewish, they would have suffered identical arrests and convictions, but lacking any wealthy and politically mobilized Jewish community to rally around them, they would have received their punishments, just or unjust, and immediately been forgotten. Instead, Theodor Herzl, the founding father of Zionism, later claimed that the massive anti-Semitism revealed by the Dreyfus Affair was the basis of his personal ideological awakening, while the Frank Affair led to the establishment of America’s Anti-Defamation League. And both these cases have entered our history books as among the most notorious examples of pre-World War I anti-Semitism.

 

Lindemann’s discussion of the often difficult relations between Russia’s restive Jewish minority and its huge Slavic majority is also quite interesting, and he provides numerous instances in which major incidents, supposedly demonstrating the enormously strong appeal of vicious anti-Semitism, were quite different than has been suggested by the legend. The famous Kishinev Pogrom of 1903 was obviously the result of severe ethnic tension in that city, but contrary to the regular accusations of later writers, there seems absolutely no evidence of high-level government involvement, and the widespread claims of 700 dead that so horrified the entire world were grossly exaggerated, with only 45 killed in the urban rioting. Chaim Weizmann, the future president of Israel, later promoted the story that he himself and some other brave Jewish souls had personally defended their people with revolvers in hand even as they saw the mutilated bodies of 80 Jewish victims. This account was totally fictional since Weizmann happened to have been be hundreds of miles away when the riots occurred.

Although a tendency to lie and exaggerate was hardly unique to the political partisans of Russian Jewry, the existence of a powerful international network of Jewish journalists and Jewish-influenced media outlets ensured that such concocted propaganda stories might receive enormous worldwide distribution, while the truth followed far behind, if at all.

For related reasons, international outrage was often focused on the legal confinement of most of Russia’s Jews to the “Pale of Settlement,” suggesting some sort of tight imprisonment; but that area was the traditional home of the Jewish population and encompassed a landmass almost as large as France and Spain combined. The growing impoverishment of Eastern European Jews during that era was often assumed to be a consequence of hostile government policy, but the obvious explanation was extraordinary Jewish fecundity, which far outstripped that of their Slavic fellow countrymen, and quickly led them to outgrow the available spots in any of their traditional “middleman” occupations, a situation worsened by their total disinclination to engage in agriculture or other primary-producer activities. Jewish communities expressed horror at the risk of losing their sons to the Czarist military draft, but this was simply the flip-side of the full Russian citizenship they had been granted, and no different from what was faced by their non-Jewish neighbors.

Certainly the Jews of Russia suffered greatly from widespread riots and mob attacks in the generation prior to World War I, and these did sometimes have substantial government encouragement, especially in the aftermath of the very heavy Jewish role in the 1905 Revolution. But we should keep in mind that a Jewish plotter had been implicated in the killing of Czar Alexander II, and Jewish assassins had also struck down several top Russian ministers and numerous other government officials. If the last decade or two had seen American Muslims assassinate a sitting U.S. President, various leading Cabinet members, and a host of our other elected and appointed officials, surely the position of Muslims in this country would have become a very uncomfortable one.

As Lindemann candidly describes the tension between Russia’s very rapidly growing Jewish population and its governing authorities, he cannot avoid mentioning the notorious Jewish reputation for bribery, corruption, and general dishonesty, with numerous figures of all political backgrounds noting that the remarkable Jewish propensity to commit perjury in the courtroom led to severe problems in the effective administration of justice. The eminent American sociologist E.A. Ross, writing in 1913, characterized the regular behavior of Eastern European Jews in very similar terms.

Lindemann also allocates a short chapter to discussing the 1911 Beilis Affair, in which a Ukrainian Jew was accused of the ritual murder of a young Gentile boy, an incident that generated a great deal of international attention and controversy. Based on the evidence presented, the defendant seems likely to have been innocent, although the obvious lies he repeatedly told police interrogators hardly helped foster that impression, and “the system worked” in that he was ultimately found innocent by the jurors at his trial. However, a few pages are also given to a much less well-known ritual murder case in late 19th century Hungary, in which the evidence of Jewish guilt seemed far stronger, though the author hardly accepted the possible reality of such an outlandish crime. Such reticence was quite understandable since the publication of Ariel Toaff’s remarkable volume on the subject was still a dozen years in the future.

 

ORDER IT NOW

Lindemann subsequently expanded his examination of historical anti-Semitism into a much broader treatment, Esau’s Tears, which appeared in 1997. In this volume, he added comparative studies of the social landscape in Germany, Britain, Italy, and several other European countries, and demonstrated that the relationship between Jews and non-Jews varied greatly across different locations and time periods. But although I found his analysis quite useful and interesting, the extraordinarily harsh attacks his text provoked from some outraged Jewish academics seemed even more intriguing.

For example, Judith Laikin Elkin opened her discussion in The American Historical Review by describing the book as a “545-page polemic” a strange characterization of a book so remarkably even-handed and factually-based in its scholarship. Writing in Commentary, Robert Wistrich was even harsher, stating that merely reading the book had been a painful experience for him, and his review seemed filled with spittle-flecked rage. Unless these individuals had somehow gotten copies of a different book, I found their attitudes simply astonishing.

I was not alone in such a reaction. Richard S. Levy of the University of Illinois, a noted scholar of anti-Semitism, expressed amazement at Wistrich’s seemingly irrational outburst, while Paul Gottfried, writing in Chronicles, mildly suggested that Lindemann had “touched raw nerves.” Indeed, Gottfried’s own evaluation quite reasonably criticized Lindemann for perhaps being a little too even-handed, sometimes presenting numerous conflicting analyzes without choosing between them. For those interested, a good discussion of the book by Alan Steinweis, a younger scholar specializing in the same topic, is conveniently available online.

The remarkable ferocity with which some Jewish writers attacked Lindemann’s meticulous attempt to provide an accurate history of anti-Semitism may carry more significance than merely an exchange of angry words in low-circulation academic publications. If our mainstream media shapes our reality, scholarly books and articles based upon them tend to set the contours of that media coverage. And the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them.

ORDER IT NOW

The undeniable truth is that for many centuries Jews usually constituted a wealthy and privileged segment of the population in nearly all the European countries in which they resided, and quite frequently they based their livelihood upon the heavy exploitation of a downtrodden peasantry. Even without any differences in ethnicity, language, or religion, such conditions almost invariably provoke hostility. The victory of Mao’s Communist forces in China was quickly followed by the brutal massacre of a million or more Han Chinese landlords by the Han Chinese poor peasants who regarded them as cruel oppressors, with William Hinton’s classic Fanshen describing the unfortunate history that unfolded in one particular village. When similar circumstances led to violent clashes in Eastern Europe between Slavs and Jews, does it really make logical sense to employ a specialized term such as “anti-Semitism” to describe that situation?

Furthermore, some of the material presented in Lindemann’s rather innocuous text might also lead to potentially threatening ideas. Consider, for example, the notorious Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, almost certainly fictional, but hugely popular and influential during the years following World War I and the Bolshevik Revolution. The fall of so many longstanding Gentile dynasties and their replacement by new regimes such as Soviet Russia and Weimar Germany, which were heavily dominated by their tiny Jewish minorities, quite naturally fed suspicions of a worldwide Jewish plot, as did the widely discussed role of Jewish international bankers in producing those political outcomes.

Over the decades, there has been much speculation about the possible inspiration for the Protocols, but although Lindemann makes absolutely no reference to that document, he does provide a very intriguing possible candidate. Jewish-born British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli certainly ranked as one of the most influential figures of the late 19th century, and in his novel Coningsby, he has the character representing Lord Lionel Rothschild boast about the existence of a vast and secret network of powerful international Jews, who stand near the head of almost every major nation, quietly controlling their governments from behind the scenes. If one of the world’s most politically well-connected Jews eagerly promoted such notions, was Henry Ford really so unreasonable in doing the same?

Lindemann also notes Disraeli’s focus on the extreme importance of race and racial origins, a central aspect of traditional Jewish religious doctrine. He reasonably suggests that this must surely have had a huge influence upon the rise of those political ideas, given that Disraeli’s public profile and stature were so much greater than the mere writers or activists whom our history books usually place at center stage. In fact, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, a leading racial theorist, actually cited Disraeli as a key source for his ideas. Jewish intellectuals such as Max Nordau and Cesare Lombroso are already widely recognized as leading figures in the rise of the racial science of that era, but Disraeli’s under-appreciated role may have actually been far greater. The deep Jewish roots of European racialist movements are hardly something that many present-day Jews would want widely known.

 

One of the harsh Jewish critics of Esau’s Tears denounced Cambridge University Press for even allowing the book to appear in print, and although that major work is easily available in English, there are numerous other cases where an important but discordant version of historical reality has been successfully blocked from publication. For decades most Americans would have ranked Nobel Laureate Alexander Solzhenitsyn as among the world’s greatest literary figures, and his Gulag Archipelago alone sold over 10 million copies. But his last work was a massive two-volume account of the tragic 200 years of shared history between Russians and Jews, and despite its 2002 release in Russian and numerous other world languages, there has yet to be an authorized English translation, though various partial editions have circulated on the Internet in samizdat form.

ORDER IT NOW

At one point, a full English version was briefly available for sale at Amazon.com and I purchased it. Glancing through a few sections, the work seemed quite even-handed and innocuous to me, but it seemed to provide a far more detailed and uncensored account than anything else previously available, which obviously was the problem. The Bolshevik Revolution resulted in the deaths of many tens of millions of people worldwide, and the overwhelming Jewish role in its leadership would become more difficult to erase from historical memory if Solzhenitsyn’s work were easily available. Also, his candid discussion of the economic and political behavior of Russian Jewry in pre-revolutionary times directly conflicted with the hagiography widely promoted by Hollywood and the popular media. Historian Yuri Slezkine’s award-winning 2004 book The Jewish Century provided many similar facts, but his treatment was far more cursory and his public stature not remotely the same.

Near the end of his life, Solzhenitsyn gave his political blessing to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Russia’s leaders honored him upon his death, while his Gulag volumes are now enshrined as mandatory reading in the standard high school curriculum of today’s overwhelmingly Christian Russia. But even as his star rose again in his own homeland, it seems to have sharply fallen in our own country, and his trajectory may eventually relegate him to nearly un-person status.

A couple of years after the release of Solzhenitsyn’s controversial final book, an American writer named Anne Applebaum published a thick history bearing the same title Gulag, and her work received enormously favorable media coverage and won her a Pulitzer Prize; I have even heard claims that her book has been steadily replacing that earlier Gulag on many college reading lists. But although Jews constituted a huge fraction of the top leadership of the Soviet Gulag system during its early decades, as well as that of the dreaded NKVD which supplied the inmates, nearly her entire focus on her own ethnic group during Soviet times is that of victims rather than victimizers. And by a remarkable irony of fate, she shares a last name with one of the top Bolshevik leaders, Hirsch Apfelbaum, who concealed his own ethnic identity by calling himself Grigory Zinoviev.

ORDER IT NOW

The striking decline in Solzhenitsyn’s literary status in the West came just a decade or two after an even more precipitous collapse in the reputation of David Irving, and for much the same reason. Irving probably ranked as the most internationally successful British historian of the last one hundred years and a renowned scholar of World War II, but his extensive reliance on primary source documentary evidence posed an obvious threat to the official narrative promoted by Hollywood and wartime propaganda. When he published his magisterial Hitler’s War, this conflict between myth and reality came into the open, and an enormous wave of attacks and vilification was unleashed, gradually leading to his purge from respectability and eventually even his imprisonment.

ORDER IT NOW

Similarly, Israeli academic Ariel Toaff, son of the chief rabbi of Rome, was regarded as one of the world’s leading scholarly authorities on Medieval Jewry. But when he published his remarkable 2004 analysis suggesting the likely reality of the Jewish ritual murders of Christian children throughout history, the resulting media firestorm forced the cancellation of the book’s publication, and the work only survives in samizdat form, while there were even calls for his arrest and incarceration.

In other cases, pressure from the ADL and similar Jewish activist groups have led Amazon to completely eliminate entire categories of historical analysis and ban those publishers who produce such works, which drastically reduces their availability to the reading public.

All of these cases were the sort of high-profile examples which are well-known to anyone who pays attention to such matters. But surely there must have been many other incidents, involving far less prominent authors, which never received any significant media coverage, and also a vastly larger universe of cases in which writers have self-censored their texts in order to avoid such controversies. Over the decades, I have gradually discovered through sad experience that I must exercise extreme caution whenever I read anything relating to the subjects of Jews, Judaism, or Israel.

 

These important examples may help to explain the puzzling contrast between the behavior of Jews in the aggregate and Jews as individuals. Observers have noticed that even fairly small Jewish minorities may often have a major impact upon the far larger societies that host them. But on the other hand, in my experience at least, a large majority of individual Jews do not seem all that different in their personalities or behavior than their non-Jewish counterparts. So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.

We live our lives constantly immersed in media narratives, and these allow us to decide the rights and wrongs of a situation. The vast majority of people, Jew and Gentile alike, are far more likely to take strong action if they are convinced that their cause is a just one. This is obviously the basis for war-time propaganda.

Now suppose that a relatively small number of zealous Jewish partisans are known to always attack and denounce journalists or authors who accurately describe Jewish misbehavior. Over time, this ongoing campaign of intimidation may cause many important facts to be left on the cutting-room floor, or even gradually expel from mainstream respectability those writers who refuse to conform to such pressures. Meanwhile, similar small numbers of Jewish partisans frequently exaggerate the misdeeds committed against Jews, sometimes piling their exaggerations upon past exaggerations already produced by a previous round of such zealots.

Eventually, these two combined trends may take a complex and possibly very mixed historical record and transform it into a simple morality-play, with innocent Jews tremendously injured by vicious Jew-haters. And as this morality-play becomes established it deepens the subsequent intensity of other Jewish-activists, who redouble their demands that the media “stop vilifying Jews” and covering up the supposed evils inflicted upon them. An unfortunate circle of distortion following exaggeration following distortion can eventually produce a widely accepted historical account that bears little resemblance to the reality of what actually happened.

So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger.

Furthermore, this situation is exacerbated by the common tendency of Jews to “cluster” together, perhaps respresenting just one or two percent of the total population, but often constituting 20% or 40% or 60% of their immediate peer-group, especially in certain professions. Under such conditions, the ideas or emotional agitation of some Jews probably permeates others around them, often provoking additional waves of indignation.

As a rough analogy, a small quantity of uranium is relatively inert and harmless, and entirely so if distributed within low-density ore. But if a significant quantity of weapons-grade uranium is sufficiently compressed, then the neutrons released by fissioning atoms will quickly cause additional atoms to undergo fission, with the ultimate result of that critical chain-reaction being a nuclear explosion. In similar fashion, even a highly agitated Jew may have no negative impact, but if the collection of such agitated Jews becomes too numerous and clusters together too closely, they may work each other into a terrible frenzy, perhaps with disastrous consequences both for themselves and for their larger society. This is especially true if those agitated Jews begin to dominate certain key nodes of top-level control, such as the central political or media organs of a society.

Whereas most living organizations exist solely in physical reality, human beings also occupy an ideational space, with the interaction of human consciousness and perceived reality playing a major role in shaping behavior. Just as the pheromones released by mammals or insects can drastically affect the reactions of their family members or nest-mates, the ideas secreted by individuals or the media-emitters of a society can have an enormous impact upon their fellows.

A cohesive, organized group generally possesses huge advantages over a teeming mass of atomized individuals, just as a Macedonian Phalanx could easily defeat a vastly larger body of disorganized infantry. Many years ago, on some website somewhere I came across a very insightful comment regarding the obvious connection between “anti-Semitism” and “racism,” which our mainstream media organs identify as two of the world’s greatest evils. Under this analysis, “anti-Semitism” represents the tendency to criticize or resist Jewish social cohesion, while “racism” represents the attempt of white Gentiles to maintain a similar social cohesion of their own. To the extent that the ideological emanations from our centralized media organs serve to strengthen and protect Jewish cohesion while attacking and dissolving any similar cohesion on the part of their Gentile counterparts, the former will obviously gain enormous advantages in resource-competition against the latter.

Religion obviously constitutes an important unifying factor in human social groups and we cannot ignore the role of Judaism in this regard. Traditional Jewish religious doctrine seems to consider Jews as being in a state of permanent hostility with all non-Jews, and the use of dishonest propaganda is an almost inevitable aspect of such conflict. Furthermore, since Jews have invariably been a small political minority, maintaining such controversial tenets required the employment of a massive framework of subterfuge and dissimulation in order to conceal their nature from the larger society surrounding them. It has often been said that truth is the first casualty in war, and surely the cultural influences of over a thousand years of such intense religious hostility may continue to quietly influence the thinking of many modern Jews, even those who have largely abandoned their religious beliefs.

The notorious Jewish tendency to shamelessly lie or wildly exaggerate has sometimes had horrifying human consequences. I very recently discovered a fascinating passage in Peter Moreira’s 2014 book The Jew Who Defeated Hitler: Henry Morgenthau Jr., FDR, and How We Won the War, focused on the important political role of that powerful Secretary of the Treasury.

A turning point in Henry Morgenthau Jr.’s relationship with the Jewish community came in November 1942, when Rabbi Stephen Wise came to the corner office to tell the secretary what was happening in Europe. Morgenthau knew of the millions of deaths and the lampshades made from victims’ skin, and he asked Wise not to go into excessive details. But Wise went on to tell of the barbarity of the Nazis, how they were making soap out of Jewish flesh. Morgenthau, turning paler, implored him, “Please, Stephen, don’t give me the gory details.” Wise went on with his list of horrors and Morgenthau repeated his plea over and over again. Henrietta Klotz was afraid her boss would keel over. Morgenthau later said the meeting changed his life.

It is easy to imagine that Morgenthau’s gullible acceptance of such obviously ridiculous war-time atrocity stories played a major role when he later lent his name and support to remarkably brutal American occupation policies that probably led to the postwar deaths of many millions of innocent German civilians.

Related Reading:

 
The American Pravda Series
Hide 664 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous[221] • Disclaimer says:

    @Ron Unz

    If you really want your mind blown, read Voluptuous Panic by Mel Gordon. It covers the Weimar Republic and how debauched they were. Everything from mother daughter prostitute teams, to a lot of gay sex, to pedo stuff too.

    It was so over the top I couldn’t believe it. But at the same time we are starting to see the parallels here in America. Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry. I would like you to cover this sexual angle in a future article.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sic Semper
    Pedophilia is a protected sacrament in the jewish community. There are thousands of victims in NY City with a sitting NY Governor and his NY Governor father having profited and protected a serial child rapist for decades. The media erases the cries of the victims and instead works to rehabilitate the public images of child rapists see Anderson Cooper of CNN/60 Minutes interview titled: An Unlikely Informant in 2015: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-informant-michael-blutrich-60-minutes/

    The most detailed examination of the relationship of two NY Governors, their political party and a serial child rapist was conducted in 1999 by an outraged ex-NYPD detective: https://www.scribd.com/document/327564828/USA-Confidential-December-1998

    This seminal investigation was cited by The American Spectator https://www.scribd.com/document/383369648/Banking-on-Cuomo
    as well as other newspapers during the ensuing conviction of said child rapist, not for serial raping children, but a $400 Million fraud where current NY Governor was personally appointed to the board of directors.

    No mention has been made of these stories in more than 20 years. The pleas of hundreds of victims are completely ignored by the media.
    , @Martin Luther
    Rather Funny but I was reading about the Trump vrs NYTimes controversy. I began to wonder about not just jews individually but jewish conrol (USA) institutions in major pro Zionist historical events....what has been the role of the NYTimes during the USA Civil War, the creation of the Fed, WW I, WW II, the Vietnam, Watergate, JFK,RKennedy, 911, dimise, etc. has any scholar investigated the UNknown history of the NYTimes …???? IBM heped the NAZIs...NYTImes role in Hstorical events collaboration with Nazism, pro Israel terrorists...what??
    , @nagra
    If you really want your mind blown, read Marquis de Sade
    ( just saying : )
    , @attilathehen
    Here is an interesting comment from the Amazon website:

    "There's an apocryphal story about David Bowie meeting Christopher Isherwood, author of "Berlin Stories." Bowie said something to the effect that it must have been exciting to be in Weimar Germany during the Roaring Twenties, what with the tycoons, transvestites, and spies all rubbing shoulders. At this point Isherwood felt compelled to let the relatively younger man know that he was a writer of fiction, and that the Weimar that fed his adventurous stories was very much fabricated.

    The point of this anecdote is to highlight how elusive the reality of any bygone era is at a certain remove, and to further point out that Mel Gordon does the reader interested in the real history of Weimar a bit of a disservice by (by his own admission) ignoring anything that doesn't serve his sensationalist agenda. "Eroticism" is a subjective term, and while I didn't object to the S & M/ gender play content (or even the urolagnia/coprophagia), the sexualization of children glorified in the book (even if Gordon would deny this was his intent) was a bit much too stomach.

    Taken in the right spirit, as something in the same vein as Kenneth Anger's "Hollywood Babylon," which is to say a kind of salacious bit of tabloid-style light reading, the book really isn't half bad. Some of the photos, flyers, and bits of artwork are essential Weimar memorabilia that help give the reader insight into Germany's ill-fated experiment with democracy in the post-Wilhelmine era. But those of a more scholarly bent beware: there is a bibliography, but no sources, and when I attempted to find external corroboration of many of the assertions in the book, the only results I got online led me right back to this book. That's a red flag right there. Tepid recommendation."

    "Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry." And yet, the churches and other groups (non-Jews) do very little about it. The RCC has been taken over by homos so you won't hear condemnation of anything. The RCC is the biggest human-trafficking institution on the planet. It's not the Jews. It's the cucks. If Jews own the porn industry (which they don't), why don't they name the Jews? The Western cuck is incapable of doing anything. The cuck's mind is so twisted by "universal church" and "universal brotherhood," he can't make a statement about anything. This "blame the Jews" schtick has to end. It is time to deal squarely with the problems in the West. The cucks are going to have be dragged kicking and screaming into the battle.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. utu says:

    OMG, RU compared Jews to uranium.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Real K5
    It is a metaphor and it works
    , @Anon
    Oppenheimer was Jewish. A great scientist.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. Dr. Pol says:

    /pol/ was right again.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James Forrestal

    /pol/ was right again.
     
    /pol/ is always right.

    The concept of "anti-semitism" is not only a marvelous piece of reified projection, but reflects an entire narrative -- a worldview -- in one word. If one accepts the validity of this construct, he accepts a narrative frame that demands that any and all conflicts between Jews and other peoples not only can, but must be explained, not by conflicts over territory, resources, ideology, etc., but by the simple "fact" that most non-Jews harbor a psychotic, irrational, insane hatred for the Chosen People. For reasons that have nothing to do with the actions of the Tribe, and everything to do with the psychopathology of the goyim. This is a very convenient explanation for intergroup conflict -- for one side, anyway.

    In addition to facilitating the guilting of the goyim in the stereotypically-Jewish "aggressive victim" manner, the "anti-Semitism" canard also helps to enhance/ maintain group cohesion by maintaining / reinforcing Jewish paranoia/ hatred/ supremacism towards outsiders. If the goyim fail to generate "adequate" levels of "anti-Semitism," it must be manufactured. See the notorious Jewish community center bomb threats, for example. Perpetrated by some evil neon-nazi, no doubt. Nope:
    http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Dual-US-Israeli-citizen-behind-most-JCC-bomb-threat-calls-484990

    To put it another way... what is the prevalence of "anti-Gentilism?" How is it defined? Name a recent incident that was motivated largely by "anti-Gentilism." There's no such thing? Why? Hmm...
    You've been suckered, goys. A rather ingenious long con.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. RobinG says:

    This film is a smart take-down of the anti-Semitism charade, made with humor and a light touch. While deftly revealing the absurdity, it manages to entertain.

    “Defamation” – An Israeli’s examination of the ADL and anti-Semitism

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cloak And Dagger
    Yeah - I loved it when it came out. Sure showed the ADL for who they were.
    , @Chu
    I liked how they indoctrinated the kids in Israel before they flew to Poland that the world (etc al) hates Jews. More evidence on how the socially control their congregants, even without the rabbinate's influences.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Anon[413] • Disclaimer says:

    Chaim Weizman, the future president of Israel, later promoted the story

    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Indeed.

    "We reached the [Balfour] Declaration not by miracles, but through persistent propaganda, through unceasing demonstration of the life force of our people. We told the responsible authorities: We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not. You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world."

    - World Zionist leader [1st President of Israël] Chaim Weizmann, speech in Jerusalem, December 1919.
     
    www.codoh.com
    , @phil
    David Irving found a document in Weizmann's archives saying that, not only had Jews gotten the US into WWI; they could also get the US into WWII.

    Astonishing when you really think about it.

    , @cassandra

    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.
     
    The Declaration was finally made not to Weizmann but Rothschild. Curious, that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. Peasant says:

    I am curious as to what Mr Unz thinks of Dov Bechhofer an orthodox Jew who was recently doxed for being a supporter of White nationalism?

    see here

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/07/dov-bechhofer-did-nothing-wrong/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. Anon[208] • Disclaimer says:

    Still reading…. On the fly “Coningsby” not “Conigsby” (btw have you got any Hitler or other Nazi references to it?)

    I sought, by Googling, to see if Em Prof Albert S. Lindemann was/is, as I thought till I looked up “Walter Lindemann, Lord Cherwell” and found what Wiki says about the great Frederick (sic) Lindemann, Jewish. I still don’t know as the Wikipedia entry is somehow mysteriously “archived”. Is this a known condition? I don’t suppose Albert S. is Jewish…. Pity.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    If prof Lindemann, Churchill's scientific advisor, later Lord Cherwell, was a jew, opinions were divided.
    His mother was jewish, if she already was jewish before her marriage to a jew, is uncertain.
    Lindemann's father, his mother's second marriage, was not a jew.
    But his father was financed by a Rothschild.
    Lindemann on the one hand was known for his antisemitic jokes, on the other for his hatred of Hitler Germany.
    His misuse of a scientific study by Solly Zuckermann on the bombing of Coventry convinced Churchill that bombing the German civilian population was the thing to do.
    Jones, of British scientific counter espionage made fun of Lindemann about Lindemann, a physics professor, denial of the existence of the VII.
    As Jones said, Churchill present 'if the British had no idea how to do it, maybe the Germans did'.
    After WWII Zuckermann learned about the misuse of his Coventry report, in his biography he writes that the bombing of German civilians harmed GB more than Germany, and prolonged the war.
    Churchill never forgave Jones.
    R.V. Jones, ´Most secret war, British Scientific Intelligence 1939 – 1945’, 1978, 1979, London
    Solly Zuckermann, ‘From Apes to Warlords, an autobiography, 1904- 46’, London 1988
    Adrian Fort, ´PROF, The Life of Frederick Lindemann´, London 2003
    The Earl of Birkenhead, ‘The Prof in Two Worlds, The official life of Professor F. A. Lindemann’, Viscount Cherwell, London, 1961
    C.P.Snow, ´Science and government’, 1961, Cambridge, Massachusetts
    , @jilles dykstra
    Benjamin Disraeli, 'Coningsby', 1844, 1983, Harmondsworth
    Only indirect 'England ist total verjudet'.
    Something like 'completely judaized'.
    What is not true, as the following title already makes clear
    E. T. Raymond (Edward Raymond Thompson), 'Disraeli: The Alien Patriot', 1925, London
    , @ohmy
    Anon 208 asks; " I still don’t know as the Wikipedia entry is somehow mysteriously “archived”. Is this a known condition?
    Anon 208, who do you think is the editor in-chief of Wikipedia, and also Wikileaks?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  8. Brilliant! Simply brilliant description and reasoning!!!!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. With bated breath we eagerly await the 50 megaton ‘Tsar Bomba’ American Pravda the Holocaust.

    Although a tendency to lie and exaggerate was hardly unique to the political partisans of Russian(International) Jewry, the existence of a powerful international network of Jewish journalists and Jewish-influenced media outlets ensured that such concocted propaganda stories might receive enormous worldwide distribution, while the truth followed far behind, if at all.

    Just change a word in your quote Russian to international and we’re talking about the Holocaust.

    the remarkable Jewish propensity to commit perjury in the courtroom led to severe problems in the effective administration of justice.

    That would be Nuremburg.

    Morgenthau knew of the millions of deaths and the lampshades made from victims’ skin, and he asked Wise not to go into excessive details. But Wise went on to tell of the barbarity of the Nazis, how they were making soap out of Jewish flesh

    But we’re led to believe that millions of Jews were gassed to death in primitive brickhouses with wooden doors another fairy tale like lampshades and soap.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Abbybwood
    Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!

    I was listening to an update by Alan Zabrosky last night where he laments that it is game over for the United States related to Jewish control over The White House, Congress and more and more state legislatures.

    Already about 20 or more states have made it illegal to support the BDS movement. Soon any negative discussions or questioning of “the official story”regarding The Holocaust will be illegal, so get at it Ron while you still can!
    , @Heros
    This foto really reveals the fraud:

    https://wearswar.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/gaschamberdoors1.jpg?w=1204&h=2048
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  10. Wally says:

    Unz said:
    “… the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them.”

    The absolute best examples of that are the fake ’6M Jews and gas chambers”, forgetting for the moment the equally fraudulent ’5M others’ used by Jews to essentially buy votes for their agenda.

    It’s quite bizarre that Jews actually want 6M Jews to be dead. Revisionists bring Jews good news. Jews should be elated to know that 6,000,000 of their brethren were not murdered.

    Truth can no longer be stopped. Regardless of “Holocau$t Industry” lies, their religion does not hold up to scientific, rational scrutiny.

    Be part of the solution:
    The ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @mcohen
    gimme a wally

    Hohohohohoho at codoh

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2wXH8m34-js
    , @Sic Semper

    a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews
     
    Replace the word 'jews' with 'cells' and you have aptly described cancer
    , @Moi
    Though I don't know if this is true, I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel's victory in the '67 war. After that there was a flood of holocaust books. Can anyone shed some light on this....
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. Anonymous[413] • Disclaimer says:

    Even without any differences in ethnicity, language, or religion, such conditions almost invariably provoke hostility….. When similar circumstances led to violent clashes in Eastern Europe between Slavs and Jews, does it really make logical sense to employ a specialized term such as “anti-Semitism” to describe that situation?

    Good question.

    Certainly the Jews of Russia suffered greatly from widespread riots and mob attacks in the generation prior to World War I.

    Certainly individual Jews suffered harm as a result of the inter-class or inter-ethnic conflict of that period. Is it really accurate though to describe “the Jews of Russia” as having suffered, much less “suffered greatly”? How does it look when one takes into account the frequency and magnitude of such incidents in the context of the expanse of geography and extent of decades within which they occurred (meaning that there were also vast stretches of time therein in which Jews were just living their lives)? How does that description square with the description of a population as being relatively prosperous compared to the Slavs and experiencing a remarkable surge of fecundity?

    I’ve heard that John Doyle Klier’s work on the Russian pogroms is interesting, if you aren’t already familiar with it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.

    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion—mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever “the holocaust” may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sic Semper
    Ask any "unclean meat" - the real meaning of the kosher slander "goyim," what it is like to be under their subjugation and harassment for a generation. Be it in, as Reverend Jesse Jackson appropriately labeled "Hymie Town" or a Palestinian confined to the open air death camp of Gaza - ask any of us our thoughts of the Holocaust™ - I assure you it is not as a "horror story" but a complete fabrication. Had it been real, a perfectly understandable solution likely too inefficient and lacking enough prosecutorial conviction to cure a long unchecked spreading malignancy.

    Until an unclean meat has prolonged interactions with the tribe, they cannot understand the all encompassing malevolence. No opportunity is spared to terrorize the goyim, no opportunity is spared in viciously attacking children, reputations, property and person. "Antisemitism" is the projection by jews onto every other people of what they themselves are guilty of doing to every other people.

    No act of Christian kindness is ever repaid in anything but slanderous calumnies, opportunistic profit and malignant manipulations - the embodiment of the shabbas goyim. A goyim represents an opportunity to practice thousands of years of Talmudic methodology of dehumanizing and victimizing outsiders.


    Jews Must Live and Now and Forever by Samuel Roth http://www.jrbooksonline.com/roth.htm was a complete admission of this by a disgusted jew.

    "The next time you read about a particularly bloody pogrom and pause to wonder how Christians, dedicated to a religion of mercy, can exercise so much brutality against the Jews, remember that the Jew wheedles all the mercy out of his neighbors in the ordinary course of business. He lies and cheats until he is caught. When caught, instead of accepting punishment, he moans and tears his hair, invokes the sores of ancestors in their graves and living relations at the point of death in hospitals, until the wronged gentile, nauseated, lets him go. Then, thumbing his nose at the gentile behind his back, the Jew goes about his business the same way, lying and cheating now doubly to make up for lost time. A pogrom is usually the climax of years of such relentless goading. Do you wonder that when the final reckoning comes the gentile is absolutely merciless?"
                --  Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live, Ch. 13, p. 206, f/n 31
    , @TomSchmidt
    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    That's a great insight.
    , @AaronB
    You are one of the most original thinkers here - I don't necessarily agree with everything you say, but you say interesting and original things that are out of the box.

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.

    So you won't get much appreciation here - but write for the invisible audience, its worthwhile.
    , @RealAmericanValuesCirca1776Not1965

    How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point
     
    Now if only we could manage to awaken the gentile masses to the reality that the Jews weaving these fanciful fables of victimization and hardship to manipulate and ultimately harm us are in fact the terrifying and challenging enemy that we have been wanting for.

    Then we could genuinely put that desire for heroism to good work.
    , @Wally
    Good points.

    The demonization of the great Richard Wagner is a great example.

    Euro-gentiles cannot be allowed to have their heroes, tales of courage & strength unless Jews create them, control the message within them.

    Jews:
    the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral

    The debunked game is now out in the open, change is occurring.

    www.codoh.com

    , @peterAUS
    A thoughtful post.
    , @AaronB
    I would also say that there similarities between parts of the Old Testament and Norse Sagas - both are "heroic epics" on the grand scale.

    What is fascinating is how a "heroic epic" can change form so dramatically over the centuries while retaining the essential kernel and manifest in the most unlikely and unpromising forms.

    And you are surely right that if Whites weren't materialists but had their own "heroic epics" and so themselves as protagonists in a grand sweeping narrative - as to some extent the Left does - they would have nothing fear from Jews.

    But my experiences on this site have taught me that materialism among whites, while on the wane, is far from a spent force, and I was shocked by the tenacity, rage, and fierceness with which the materialists fight for maintaining their position (witness utu, and many commenters over at Karlin)

    So we are far from out of the tunnel yet, and the metaphysical stupidity of Whites today remains astounding.

    , @cassandra
    "It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet."

    Jungian.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Wally says:
    @Anon

    Chaim Weizman, the future president of Israel, later promoted the story
     
    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.

    Indeed.

    “We reached the [Balfour] Declaration not by miracles, but through persistent propaganda, through unceasing demonstration of the life force of our people. We told the responsible authorities: We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not. You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.”

    - World Zionist leader [1st President of Israël] Chaim Weizmann, speech in Jerusalem, December 1919.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @DF
    another link to help the party ;)

    https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Bill P says:

    Some enjoyable prose in this piece. I like the image of people “secreting” ideas.

    I tend to identify religion as the fundamental issue here. Judaism and Christianity are not compatible over the long term. Over time, religions probably select for certain personality traits and have some genetic influence on populations. I suspect this has happened with Jews. People suggest Amish have self-selected for plainness; maybe Jews have selected for zeal.

    And maybe, when Jews become comfortable and secular and begin to mix more and more with gentiles in host countries, this zeal starts to fade. That seems to have happened in the USSR, and it’s probably happening here in the US outside of the Orthodox population.

    It isn’t a racial issue, because Jews aren’t really a race. They’re pretty much a standard east Mediterranean population with some degree of European ancestry. They may have been more endogamous than most, but probably no more so than Icelandic people or Finns.

    They are a people who shaped themselves with their faith, and they are not the only example of that. Take the influence of Confucius on China, for example. It seems reasonable to me that a couple thousand years of Confucianism has left its mark on the Chinese people.

    The problem is that Christians have shaped themselves on different values and concepts. At times, this has caused a lot of trouble between the two peoples. Maybe then Zionism really is a pretty reasonable solution.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  15. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:

    I can’t believe he’s on with the blood libel thing again.

    The internet acronym SMH was made for this.

    As was the football phrase “own goal”..

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. renfro says:

    Unz has given us a accurate, dispassionate summation on what is called anti Semitism.
    Well done.

    I am curious how those here who dislike Jews came to that dislike. From comments it seems that Jewish ‘politics’ (interference in US policies & Israel) and their control of most of our press, media (the censorship, slants and lowering of social and moral standards) are the two main complaints.
    For me it grew after I began a study of the Mid East post 911 and came across a section about Zionism in the ME in the British National Archives. That led me back to the US and the Jewish lobby and thru Jewish activities in the US beginning even before 1948. I absolutely did not want to believe that a Jewish or any other ‘cabal’ was controlling much of our government….but that is the way the cookie crumbled on the facts. And these ‘facts’ did not come from books, they came from months and months and months, years actually, of combing thru documents at the Library of Congress, every bill and resolution passed dealing with Jewish interest and Israel, every presidential library, all the MOUs and declassified documents and on and on.

    The only question I have had since then is what do we do about it? We have to end Jewish entitlement in the US before we can end the unholy US-Israel relationship.

    One thing I want to add to this:

    So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger.

    Is that the ordinary Jews will never stand up to the Fifth Column Jews because even the ordinary Jews benefit too much from the uber Jews hold on our government. I could go on and on about the many special favors US Jews get, the 90% of Homeland Security funds, the extra social services government money awarded ‘only’ to Jewish organizations, …..I could fill this entre site with all the gifts congress has given to the Jews courtesy of US taxpayers. You can even find awards to Jewish groups in various politicians ‘earmarks’ for gawds sake…..people have no idea, none at all about how truly deep they go into our tax money thru every agency in the US. It even involves ‘promoting Jews’ , as when Schumer several years ago required the pentagon to review records of all Jews serving in WWII and come up with some ‘heroes’ who didn’t get medals because of anti semitism.

    I would love to see Ron put his extra sharp mind to some research and do an article on this alone.

    Bottom line the Jews aren’t going to give up their special benefits. But maybe if enough ‘ordinary Americans’ learn that they are ‘not special and are third class citizens’ below the Entitled Jews they will rise up and get loud.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    " So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger. "

    Who made this statement when ?
    Quite ordinary ways.
    Depends on what one sees as ordinary.

    Spinoza was thrown out of the Dutch sephardic community because he brought a business conflict to a Dutch judge, in stead of letting the rabbi decide.
    Both Solsjenytsyn and Hödl describe how jewish communities fought for their autonomy, resisted assimilation.
    Both German and Russian jews dodged military service, though in WWI many jews did fight in the German army.

    Present day Muslims not all of them, behave in a similar way in NW Europe.
    There simply seems to be a loyalty conflict.
    In an undercover tv report on Muslims in Denmark, from mosques, one could hear the sentence 'w're not Danes, w're Muslims'.
    Sharia law was practiced in the mosques, as it is in present GB.

    About the other side of the ledger, Baruch describes his years supporting FDR as 'Public Years'.
    He does not excuse himself in this autobiography.
    I'm quite sure that Soros is equally convinced of doing the right thing.
    So, I fear, for most jews there is no other side of the ledger.
    Bernard M. Baruch, ‘Die Jahre des Dienens’, München 1962 (The public years, New York, 1960)
    The german title is even more explicit 'the years of service'.

    , @Taco Town
    Three answers:

    1. I came to my current opinion via “where there’s smoke there’s fire” reasoning. Reading alternative commentary on the internet has simply added up.
    2. I don’t distrust Jews specifically so much as I distrust the progressive left. Any opinion of Jews that I have is based on the strong correlation between the Jewish people and the progressive left.
    3. What to do about it? Defeat and suppress the progressive left.
    , @Anonymous
    Excellent post.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    One ginormous omission. Where can we get the benefit (beyond abbreviated hearsay summary) of your immense researches?
    , @jacques sheete

    We have to end Jewish entitlement in the US before we can end the unholy US-Israel relationship.
     
    That answers your question,

    I am curious how those here who dislike Jews came to that dislike.

     

    Seeing mediocre tribesmen being preferred over highly competent goyim woke me up. The special treatment is everywhere, it seems, and is confirmed by other observers, most of whom have been ignored or smeared into oblivion or worse, and I'm not only referring to the "Anointed One."
    , @PvtCharlieSlate
    My father was in the Army in WWII and was nowhere near any combat yet he was awarded a VA 10% disability. One day I asked him how he could get disability compensation when he had no sign of any disability. This was his story:
    As part of the large number of discharges going on right after the war every GI had a some kind of exit interview with an Army doctor. There were multiple reviewing stations set up side-by-side to handle the volume. When my OM’s turn came he noticed that his doctor seemed angry about something. When his review ended the doctor awarded him a 10% disability. “Why? There’s nothing wrong with me” he asked and the doctor said that the two Jewish MD’s on either side of him were giving disability awards to every single Jewish soldier who came to their station and ... dammit! ... you’re going to get a disability, too.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  17. But thinking it over, I’m not sure that I can ever recall a single real-life instance I’ve personally encountered, nor have I heard of almost any such cases from my friends or acquaintances.

    That’s basically what Michael Wolffsohn, German jew and historian, says day in day out. Instead of going after the obviously antisemitic (and anit-western, anti-democatric, anti-liberal)) islamists in Europe, the officials rather try to hunt down nice young blonde Lauren Southern for example as being “racist” for displaying “Allah is a Gay god” posters in (pretty moselm) Luton and ban her from entering the UK with the help of the “UK Terrorism Act”!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. Roy Bauer says:

    Hello Mr. Unz.

    I’ll just post this here:

    holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com

    I hope that your moderators will leave it up in the spirit of free discussion. I would love for someone to go through this document and debunk it if it is false.

    Good day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @phil
    The article at holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com says:

    'It is highly significant that among this enormous collection of secret German records, not a single one provides any evidence of mass killing, or even refers to a German wartime policy or program of “extermination.” To the contrary, many of these documents — such as those cited in this article — further demonstrate the seriousness of the efforts by high-level government and SS authorities to maintain the health of inmates by combating disease in the camps.'

    However, David Irving has been touting correspondence between Heinrich Himmler (head of the SS) and a German statistician that indicates that the number of Jews executed in the Reinhardt Camps of Eastern Poland was in the millions, not even counting the many thousands of Jews who were allegedly shot by mobile units that operated in Eastern Europe after the launch of Operation Barbarossa in 1941. He also refers to documents in which Himmler indicates a desire to conceal information about mass deaths from Hitler.

    Will the debate end up being between Irving, who lost a famous court case as a "denier," vs real denialists?

    See Irving's Youtube "The Life and Death of Heinrich Himmler." See also the document "Himmler Decodes" (British intercepts of Himmler's correspondence) at Irving's website.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  19. @Anon
    Still reading.... On the fly "Coningsby" not "Conigsby" (btw have you got any Hitler or other Nazi references to it?)

    I sought, by Googling, to see if Em Prof Albert S. Lindemann was/is, as I thought till I looked up "Walter Lindemann, Lord Cherwell" and found what Wiki says about the great Frederick (sic) Lindemann, Jewish. I still don't know as the Wikipedia entry is somehow mysteriously "archived". Is this a known condition? I don't suppose Albert S. is Jewish.... Pity.

    If prof Lindemann, Churchill’s scientific advisor, later Lord Cherwell, was a jew, opinions were divided.
    His mother was jewish, if she already was jewish before her marriage to a jew, is uncertain.
    Lindemann’s father, his mother’s second marriage, was not a jew.
    But his father was financed by a Rothschild.
    Lindemann on the one hand was known for his antisemitic jokes, on the other for his hatred of Hitler Germany.
    His misuse of a scientific study by Solly Zuckermann on the bombing of Coventry convinced Churchill that bombing the German civilian population was the thing to do.
    Jones, of British scientific counter espionage made fun of Lindemann about Lindemann, a physics professor, denial of the existence of the VII.
    As Jones said, Churchill present ‘if the British had no idea how to do it, maybe the Germans did’.
    After WWII Zuckermann learned about the misuse of his Coventry report, in his biography he writes that the bombing of German civilians harmed GB more than Germany, and prolonged the war.
    Churchill never forgave Jones.
    R.V. Jones, ´Most secret war, British Scientific Intelligence 1939 – 1945’, 1978, 1979, London
    Solly Zuckermann, ‘From Apes to Warlords, an autobiography, 1904- 46’, London 1988
    Adrian Fort, ´PROF, The Life of Frederick Lindemann´, London 2003
    The Earl of Birkenhead, ‘The Prof in Two Worlds, The official life of Professor F. A. Lindemann’, Viscount Cherwell, London, 1961
    C.P.Snow, ´Science and government’, 1961, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Read More
    • Troll: utu
    • Replies: @Ivan
    R.V. Jones book reads like a thriller. It is a uniquely revelatory book. It was pretty clear that the scientific mandarins of the UK, Lord Tizard and PMS Blunkett among others were against the bombing of civilians for many reasons, with one of the most pertinent being that it would be ineffective and counterproductive as Sir Solly Zuckermann said. In my youth when I read of Nazi atrocities I was filled with rage, but I now understand that one has to control that rage to contribute anything useful in the long run. The civilians in Germany were no more independent actors - in the sense of being immune to manipulation - than civilians elsewhere were.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:

    @Ron Unz

    Another article of interest. I didn’t know pedofelia was so prevalent amongst Jews, especially religious Jews. Of course in popular culture it is always the Catholic church that gets the blame. Makes me wonder if the church was maybe infiltrated by crypto Jews to do damage to the trust gentiles have with the church.

    The below link is a prime example of Jews being victims of their debauchery. With no one to call them out, is it any wonder this is happening? Bravo to Unz for being a brave man.

    https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/qbe8bp/the-child-rape-assembly-line-0000141-v20n11

    Read More
    • Replies: @j2
    "Of course in popular culture it is always the Catholic church that gets the blame"

    Yeah, isn't it strange. Check how many paedophiles among the Catholic priests there actually are compared to the average population, and how many actually attack children under certain age versus how many are simply homos who like teenage boys. Homos were accepted as priests after the Second Conclave, applauded as a great step forward by the mass media (in destroying this pillar of the gentile society). I checked all this once and the results were quite revealing, I mean of the mass media control of the public opinion. Not that I am Catholic, far from it. Just interesting to notice these things. A war on the Catholic Church, it is.
    , @Herro Worrd
    Turns out evangelicals and public school teachers (and I guess Jews ) are more likely to rape children than Catholics. The Church is the most calumnied organization on the planet by (guess who?) the Judeo Calvinist alliance between the Jews of Marxism and the WASP establishment of Harvard and The Rockefeller foundation
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. In the article I did not see the distinction usually made between antijudaism, and antisemitism.
    The watershed is seen in the 19th century when, on the one hand many jews stopped being religious, on the other getting equal right almost everywhere.
    The one and only jewish historian explaining anti semitism I know is
    ‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA.
    Katz mentions things like ‘close economic cooperation, intermarriage, ostentious life styles’.

    What the close economic cooperation caused was maybe demonstrated in Lithuania, where most jews were massacred before the German troops arrived.’
    The UNESCO, if I remember well, around 2000 gave money for the retauration of the ghetto of Vilnius, in itself an interesting place to see it when I saw it, 2003 or so, in ruins, very small, no ostentatious houses, and what I supposed to have been a synagogue with a floor digged out.
    I suppose there was a maximum building height, by lowering the floor inside more height was attained.

    Anyhow, when the UNESCO money was about to come the question was asked in the Lithuanian parliament ‘if the Luthianians again should become the slaves of jews’, something like that.
    Dan Jacobson, ‘Heshels Rijk Familiekroniek’, Amsterdam 1998; the massacres described.
    Lonely Planet Guide ‘Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania’, Nicola Williams, Debra Herrmann, Cathryn Kemp, 2003, Victoria, Australia; the question in parliament.

    I suppose jews see me as an antisemite, I see myself just as someone who criticises jewish behaviour, certainly not of all jews.
    On the contrary, I see the majority of jewry as victims, of their identity, and of maybe, in my estimate, of no more that a few thousand jews, people like neocons, Soros, Netanyahu, etc.
    I still am of the same opinion of what around 1890 one Rothschild wrote to another ‘the only enemy of jews is jews’.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. Caruthers says:

    “Many years ago, on some website somewhere I came across a very insightful comment regarding the obvious connection between “anti-Semitism” and “racism,” which our mainstream media organs identify as two of the world’s greatest evils. Under this analysis, “anti-Semitism” represents the tendency to criticize or resist Jewish social cohesion, while “racism” represents the attempt of white Gentiles to maintain a similar social cohesion of their own. ”
    This is a phenomenon I have often observed. It’s “racist” and “bigoted” for a person of European “gentile” ancestry to care about or discriminate on the basis of common ancestry, but “antisemitic” (and hence bigoted and racist) to object to when Jews care about or discriminate on the basis of common ancestry.
    The word “antisemitic” should be stricken from the lexicon. “Racist”—-meaning discrimination based on background/ancestry——should suffice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dan
    It should be stricken from the lexicon because it simply makes no sense. The word "Semite" refers to:

    "a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs" or "a descendant of these peoples."

    So how did "anti-Semitism" come to refer only to anti-Jewish sentiment?

    Further, the only group mentioned above that most would equate with modern Jews is the Hebrews, and their relation is rather dubious.

    A "bottom line" would be that most people who identify as Jewish are not Semitic while most Arabs are. Simplistic, but largely true.

    Note too, that while the definition I gave above is from Merriam Webster, if you "Google" it the first result Google returns is this:

    "a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic language, including in particular the Jews and Arabs."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  23. the media-emitters of a society can have an enormous impact

    A cohesive, organized group generally possesses huge advantages over a teeming mass of atomized individuals, just as a Macedonian Phalanx could easily defeat a vastly larger body of disorganized infantry.

    To the extent that the ideological emanations from our centralized media organs serve to strengthen and protect Jewish cohesion while attacking and dissolving any similar cohesion on the part of their Gentile counterparts, the former will obviously gain enormous advantages in resource-competition against the latter.

    These three statements represent very important ideas that I’ve been thinking about lately.

    1. Control the media and you can control what the society believes.
    2. Social atomization and hyper-individuality make a group relatively weak against a more socially unified group.
    3. Group competition is mostly about resource competition. Groups compete for resources.

    You seem to be saying that Jews want to weaken gentile unity (while maintaining Jewish cohesiveness). If gentiles are atomized/divided and Jews are united, Jews can more easily dominate lucrative resource niches and thrive as a tribe. Almost like a divide and conquer strategy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sic Semper
    I witness the kosher media apparatus along with its tendrils into the judiciary every single day. Tribal crimes are ignored in the media and their tendrils in the judiciary pull the strings in keeping the tribesman out of secular courts. Whereas goyim are viciously attacked in the media and scapegoated by the courts for far less than what their kosher masters do as entitlements.

    The only way to increase the power and wealth of an already unified and wealthy group is for that group to lord over broken and looted peoples. Breaking gentile eggs yields a bigger kosher omelet.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  24. ‘From prejudice to destruction, Anti-Semitism 1700-1933’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA

    Katz is/was professor of Jewish Educational and Social History, Emeritus, at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    Below is the end of the chapter, on the emergence of anti-Semitism, in Germany, around 1870.
    Scholars distinguish between anti Judaism, before Jews in most West European countries were granted equal rights, around 1800, and anti-Semitism, what began around 1870.

    Page 258, chapter ‘The incubation’.
    ‘The decisive factor in the anti-Semitic eruption was the failure to fulfil the condition upon which the eradication of Gentile suspicions of Jews had been predicated, namely, the disappearance of the tightly knit Jewish community. Far from disappearing, this community only assumed a new metamorphosis, not all aspects of which were regarded favourably by the Gentiles. Though Jews now were active inside German society, in economic life, culture, and politics, they nevertheless remained conspicuous as a group. Their pursuits, never centrally planned or directed, were determined by historical and sociological factors…….
    And despite their integration, they stood out as a closely knit group’.

    Page 259
    ‘What remained unimpaired was Jewish inbreeding, the maintaining of exclusively Jewish family ties. This, and the residues of that religious nonconformity, comparative economic co-operation, and social isolation, and some cultural peculiarity gave the Jewish group a special physiognomy. If the group was different from what it had been a century before, it certainly had not assumed the characteristics expected by those who propounded the idea of fusion with Christian society.

    Thus, instead of completely disappearing as expected, the Jewish community merely underwent a transformation. And the old stereotypes were now revived. The wait-and-see attitude of the Gentile population, which involved the concealment and suppression of anti-Jewish sentiment, turned into overt resentment. This was the point at which anti-Semitism boiled over’.

    End of chapter.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    "This, and the residues of that religious nonconformity, comparative economic co-operation, and social isolation, and some cultural peculiarity gave the Jewish group a special physiognomy. "

    In The Pity of It All, it is described how assimilated Jews who *really wanted to assimilate totally* could not do so. Their origins hung like boulders arouind their necks. They were always identified as jews, not matter what they did. So, it seems like the "cultural peculiarity" is something that Germans, too, were not willing to let go of in their view of Jews. Or, the assimilated Jews were excluded from enough Gentile organizations that they had to band together (for example, from organizations for such typical upper-middle-class pursuits such as a boating club in Berlin, or a swimming club in Vienna, and other athletic pursuits) to form their own such organizations. Then of course they are back with their own kind, reinforcing their cultural traits and developing a new subculture. These Jews might have been able to totally assimilate, leaving no Jewish traces, in another generation or two, if the Bolsh Revolution and Hitler had not come along.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  25. Dreyfus affair was a fake incedent or hoax designed to create a public anti-semitism controversy.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Would you care to elaborate on that, how the hoax worked, who was responsible and, above all evidence, sources?

    Or should we take it as supporting material for being put in the same ward as Wally?

    , @ploni almoni
    For a description of the Dreyfus Affair as a Psy-OP (a fake incident) to engineer public opinion leading to the First Zionist Congress of Basel one year later see
    http://mileswmathis.com/dreyfus.pdf

    Journalists, like Herzl and Zola are what is now called Presstitutes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. @Anon
    Still reading.... On the fly "Coningsby" not "Conigsby" (btw have you got any Hitler or other Nazi references to it?)

    I sought, by Googling, to see if Em Prof Albert S. Lindemann was/is, as I thought till I looked up "Walter Lindemann, Lord Cherwell" and found what Wiki says about the great Frederick (sic) Lindemann, Jewish. I still don't know as the Wikipedia entry is somehow mysteriously "archived". Is this a known condition? I don't suppose Albert S. is Jewish.... Pity.

    Benjamin Disraeli, ‘Coningsby’, 1844, 1983, Harmondsworth
    Only indirect ‘England ist total verjudet’.
    Something like ‘completely judaized’.
    What is not true, as the following title already makes clear
    E. T. Raymond (Edward Raymond Thompson), ‘Disraeli: The Alien Patriot’, 1925, London

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. JackOH says:

    You’re a pretty courageous guy, Ron.

    I’d like to see an enterprising academic or independent writer pull together the threads, and make the case that the careers of how the terms “anti-Semitism” and “racism” have come to be used have themselves enabled “compulsory philo-Semitism”, “anti-Christianity”, Black Supremacism, anti-White racism, self-censorship, and much narrowed possibilities for public debate to solve America’s problems. I’m sort of half-confident such a case can be made.

    For example, anti-Semitism = Auschwitz, racism = slavery–these “equations”, I think, have found a purchase within the popular political imagination by dint of popular novels and movies. You offer a sharp criticism of a particular Israeli policy or action, as Philip Giraldi has done, and whack, you’re an anti-Semite. You offer the opinion that many Black students may be better off in the manual trades, and whack, you’re a racist. Auschwitz, slavery. I’m caricaturing a bit, I suppose, but not by a whole lot.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. mcohen says:

    Obviously you would not publish again the ritual murder of christian children by orthodox rabbis story unless you had solid proof and sources.

    So

    1.where did they take place.country and town
    2.what were the names of the rabbis
    3.were they ever convicted
    4.did any other people besides jews commit the same crimes.
    5.do you understand the biblical story of abraham sacrificing a ram instead of his son

    Read More
    • Replies: @res

    4.did any other people besides jews commit the same crimes.
     
    That says a great deal. Time to change the narrative from denial to tu quoque?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  29. Usual stream-of-consciousness. I may agree with something with the author, disagree with him on other points, but- he has not stressed enough that “classical Jew” is alien to the West & there is no way of ignoring that (assimilated Jews are something different & they would need a separate & more nuanced analysis).

    “the Hebrews, a very recent people…an Arab horde”.

    Voltaire, referring to the Jews in op. cit., “Genèse”.

    “The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world”

    Johann Gottfried Herder
    , “Behkerung der Juden”,

    “The Jew is the enemy of the human race. This race must be sent back to Asia or exterminated”.

    Pierre Joseph Proudhon, “Selected Writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon”

    “The Palestinians living among us have, for the most part, earned a not-unfounded reputation for being cheaters, because of their spirit of usury since their exile. Certainly, it seems strange to conceive of a nation of cheaters; but it is just as odd to think of a nation of merchants, the great majority of whom, bound by an ancient superstition that is recognized by the State they live in, seek no civil dignity and try to make up for this loss by the advantage of duping the people among whom they find refuge, and even one another. The situation could not be otherwise, given a whole nation of merchants, as non-productive members of society (for example, the Jews in Poland). So their constitution, which is sanctioned by ancient precepts and even by the people among whom they live (since we have certain sacred writings in common with them), cannot consistently be abolished — even though the supreme principle of their morality in trading with us is “Let the buyer beware.” I shall not engage in the futile undertaking of lecturing to these people, in terms of morality, about cheating and honesty. Instead, I shall present my conjectures about the origin of this peculiar constitution (the constitution, namely, of a nation of merchants).”

    Immanuel Kant, from “Anthropology from the Pragmatic Viewpoint”

    Contempt for theory, art, history, and for man as an end in himself, which is contained in an abstract form in the Jewish religion, is the real, conscious standpoint, the virtue of the man of money. The species-relation itself, the relation between man and woman, etc., becomes an object of trade! The woman is bought and sold.

    The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.

    Karl Marx, On the Jewish Question

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    The pompous Bardon Kaldian babbling about something again. When he isn't bragging about his supposed high IQ he is calling out people as antisemites and thinking up strange convoluted reasons why the Jews are never wrong and are always victims.

    This whole classical Jew vs assimilated Jew argument is laughable. In other words the kind of Jew that is causing all the problems are a tiny, tiny segment of all Jews. And once they are assimilated, it is nothing but apple pie and baseball. Might as well import all the Jews world wide so we can assimilate them lol. Well the problem with that is we know that even assimilated Jews, like presumably you, more often than not have similar character flaws. So it is a moot point.

    You can also say that the problems with black people are not from black people per se but an issue of classical blacks vs assimilated blacks. Or there is no Muslim problem, there are classical muslims vs assimilated muslims. But you would laugh at those examples no?
    , @anonymous

    “The Palestinians living among us have, for the most part, earned a not-unfounded reputation for being cheaters, because of their spirit of usury since their exile. ...”

    Immanuel Kant, from “Anthropology from the Pragmatic Viewpoint
     
    Of course, Mr.Kunt obviously got the right idea about Judenscum, but he whitewashes the satanic levels of greed and psychopathy of his own kind.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. Thank you for your excellent and ongoing investigation of “the Jewish problem”.
    http://www.911nwo.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  31. But we should keep in mind that a Jewish plotter had been implicated in the killing of Czar Alexander II, and Jewish assassins had also struck down several top Russian ministers and numerous other government officials.

    In the article you published by Anatoly Karlin ” The Russian Empire: Too Nice for Its Own Good ” ( September 26 2017 ), Mr K writes, “What Communist propagandists don’t like to mention as much is that just during the three years1904-1907 some 4,500 Tsarist officials were murdered by what would today be classified as Far Left terrorist groups.”

    It would be interesting to discover what percentage of those convicted of the murders were of Jewish origin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anatoly Karlin
    So about this issue: One time Minister of the Interior Vyacheslav von Plehve estimated that 40% of Russia's revolutionaries were Jews.

    From a 1903 speech:

    In Western Russia some 90% of the revolutionaries are Jews, and in Russia generally - some 40%. I shall not conceal from you that the revolutionary movement in Russia worries us but you should know that if you do not deter your youth from the revolutionary movement, we shall make your position untenable to such an extent that you will have to leave Russia, to the very last man!
     
    He was assassinated in 1904. In fairness, his killer seems to have been an ethnic Russian (Egor Sazonov).
    , @Anonymous
    The Czar's assassins left the following written on the wall at the scene of the murders.


    “Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht / Von seinen Knechten umgebracht,” “Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves.”


    Belshazzar, the Gentile king of Babylon who, in the Old Testament story, saw ‘the writing on the wall’ foretelling his destruction (Daniel 5) and was killed as punishment for his offences against Israel’s God. In a clever play on the Heine quotation, the unknown writer, almost certainly one of the killers, has substituted Belsatzar for Heine’s spelling Belsazar in order to signal even more clearly his intended symbolism. The Heine inscription described the racial / ethnic nature of the murders: ‘A Gentile king had just been killed as an act of Jewish retribution.’

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Heine_poem_written_on_the_wall_of_the_Ipatiev_House.gif

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. Deschutes says:

    Wow this made for great, eye-opening reading! I often wondered about how the entire anti-semite narrative started before WWII, WWI and into the 19th century and how historically accurate it was. Quite revealing that when researchers such as Lindemann publish even handed research which calls into question the mainstream dominant narrative of widespread anti-semitism, they are viciously attacked by other Jewish scholars.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. As shown in this article, there is a significant difference in how American Jews and non-Jews view the state of Israel:

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2018/06/who-backs-israel.html

    White evangelical Christians’ support for the Jewish possession of Israel is higher than for any other religious group other than modern orthodox Jews and is nearly twice the level of religious Jewish support for the concept of a God-given promise of a Jewish homeland.

    Read More
    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @Cleburne

    White evangelical Christians’ support for the Jewish possession of Israel is higher than for any other religious group other than modern orthodox Jews and is nearly twice the level of religious Jewish support for the concept of a God-given promise of a Jewish homeland.
     
    Dispensationalism (for which we can thank Mr Scofield's footnotes for the most part) is without a doubt the most successful heresy Christendom has ever produced.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. ● On the Russian pogroms, John Doyle Klier, professor of modern Jewish history at University College London, examined the archival record and found that the stories of violence reaching the West were greatly exaggerated. He published the findings in his 2005 book, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-2. Andrew Joyce has written several times about Klier’s book, most recently in this article on the Occidental Observer site; go to the paragraph beginning, ‘It was only in the 2000s’.

    quite frequently they based their livelihood upon the heavy exploitation of a downtrodden peasantry

    As an example, in Chapter 5 of Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn quotes from a report presented to Tsar Alexander III in 1881: ‘Moreover, because of their [the Jews’] cohesion and solidarity, they have, with few exceptions, directed all their efforts not toward the increase of the productive strength of the state, but primarily toward the exploitation of the poorest classes of the surrounding population.’

    ● The PDF of a complete English translation of Two Hundred Years Together can be downloaded here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
    The fairly-ready availability of the suppressed English translation of Solzhenitsyn's second major work, presents a really interesting phenomenon that is often overlooked - namely, that the 'suppression' is not aimed at making the work unavailable tout court, but is aimed at making it unavailable to the broad public.

    That way, the public discourse is kept under control - and anybody who deviates from the Overton Window will have a hard time finding fellow-travellers among their run-of-the-mill personal network.

    Enthusiasts can almost always get hold of 'suppressed' works, but nobody's going to see those works in a bookshop as they peruse the shelves (I'm assuming people still do that IRL).

    It is informative that on Amazon, entire categories are suppressed... the books contained in those categories will generally be available for download somewhere. (Whenever I see a work that might interest me, my first port of call is the various internet 'newsgroups', as indexed by the likes of NZBIndex.com - and I am rarely disappointed).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    If you really want your mind blown, read Voluptuous Panic by Mel Gordon. It covers the Weimar Republic and how debauched they were. Everything from mother daughter prostitute teams, to a lot of gay sex, to pedo stuff too.

    It was so over the top I couldn't believe it. But at the same time we are starting to see the parallels here in America. Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry. I would like you to cover this sexual angle in a future article.

    Pedophilia is a protected sacrament in the jewish community. There are thousands of victims in NY City with a sitting NY Governor and his NY Governor father having profited and protected a serial child rapist for decades. The media erases the cries of the victims and instead works to rehabilitate the public images of child rapists see Anderson Cooper of CNN/60 Minutes interview titled: An Unlikely Informant in 2015: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-informant-michael-blutrich-60-minutes/

    The most detailed examination of the relationship of two NY Governors, their political party and a serial child rapist was conducted in 1999 by an outraged ex-NYPD detective: https://www.scribd.com/document/327564828/USA-Confidential-December-1998

    This seminal investigation was cited by The American Spectator https://www.scribd.com/document/383369648/Banking-on-Cuomo
    as well as other newspapers during the ensuing conviction of said child rapist, not for serial raping children, but a $400 Million fraud where current NY Governor was personally appointed to the board of directors.

    No mention has been made of these stories in more than 20 years. The pleas of hundreds of victims are completely ignored by the media.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Fidelios Automata
    That's horrible, but probably not much different than the Catholic Church closing ranks to protect pedophile priests.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. Patricus says:

    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can’t find any.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Cleburne

    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can’t find any.
     
    At the risk of speaking for Mr Unz, I believe his point was you have to look at the Toaff book, as I did. The book (rather pdf, which I obtained via the usual samizdat channels) is incredibly dry/scholarly/detailed/non-hysterial, examines cases in medieval Germany and Italy and makes the careful case that the "blood libel" is likely not a "libel" at all.

    And no, I don't think you'd find an account of Toaff's book, much less a summary of the cases he mentions, on the internet or elsewhere.
    , @Anonymous
    http://cwporter.com/toaff.htm

    Discusses some of the reviews of and links to Toaff's book Blood Passover as well as other thoughts. Poster (Porter?) is undecided.

    Either way, although the subject is fascinating, its veracity is hardly a key component of the greater discussions Mr. Unz recent articles have ignited.
    , @Anonymous
    http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/jewish_sacrifice.htm

    This page cites 40 or more historical jewish ritual murders (usually of Christians) including those of children. Many sources are cited all the way to antiquity. Search the page for "Herodotus". The list begins there.
    , @bjondo
    Every day, in Israel, Muslim and Christian children.
    , @Anne Lid
    Read up on the Tiszaeszlár blood libel. The papers of the era covered it all over Europe, and in the end they were exonerated. I believed for a long time the official story. A servant girl, Eszter Solymosi, disappeared. A body was found in the Tisza river 80 days after her disappearance in her clothes, and the neck was untouched. When I read - only two years ago!- the exact words of the doctors who examined the cadaver it is quite clear that it did not spend 80 days submerged in water. It was a different woman in the clothes Eszter wore on the last day anyone has seen her alive. Make of it what you will!
    , @annamaria
    "Gaza Flotilla Ship Al Awda Violently Seized by Israelis, USS Liberty Survivor Amongst Those Captured:" https://consortiumnews.com/2018/07/30/gaza-flotilla-ship-al-awda-violently-seized-by-israelis-uss-liberty-survivor-amongst-those-captured/

    "People on board were tasered and hit by masked IOF soldiers. Do not believe reports of peaceful interception... blood on the deck of the Al Awda as the last participants were being dragged off the ship.."

    "Meadors [a survivor of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty] was a signalman on the bridge of the USS Liberty when it was attacked by Israeli warplanes and submarines, killing 34 U.S. sailors."
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=cclT8AV98VM
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. dearieme says:

    ‘Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, describing it as an “existential threat” to the Jewish community for the anti-Semitism it was fostering.’

    You need to tread carefully here. Corbyn’s far left mob seems indeed to include numerous anti-semites. I first noticed the strange business of leftie anti-semitism in the shower who took control of the Labour Party and the City Council in Dundee some decades ago. There is doubtless additionally what I might call ‘calculated anti-semitism’ i.e. an attempt to encourage moslems to the polls.

    And yet I agree with Labour’s refusal to be foisted with somebody else’s definition of anti-semitism, which definition looks to me to be a blatant attempt to censor political criticism of Israel. On a more rational, narrower definition, the Corbynistas still seem substantially anti-semitic to me, so the argument about definitions ought to be redundant. But because it is actually about Israel it is still pursued.

    On the internet I have been subject to accusations of anti-semitism. That’s because I am disinclined to toe the Israeli line on the history of Palestine and Israel/Palestine. Interestingly I have no memory of being accused of anti-semitism when I have opined that everything important in the Old Testament is absurd fiction. So the key matter seems to be politics – modern Israel – not Judaism.

    As for ‘Holocaust Denial’, it’s foolish or wicked to deny that Jews were murdered, presumably by the millions. No doubt lies have been told by members of the Holocaust Industry but that doesn’t mean that the slaughter didn’t happen. Making ‘Holocaust Denial’ a crime seems to me foolish or wicked too. As ever, the world is well provided with folly and evil.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    " but that doesn’t mean that the slaughter didn’t happen "
    Dying after six months in a concentration camp because of undernourishment, caused by the autonomous camp self management, that ate three times as much as the non members, slaughter ?
    In case you reject what is described by camp inmates, read what Poliakov describes about the Warsaw ghetto, exactly the same.
    Léon Poliakov, 'Bréviaire de la Haine, Le IIIe Reich et les Juifs', 1951, 1974, Paris
    , @Jeff Stryker
    English Left vs. US Left

    Pakistani Brits will naturally veer towards the Left for the generous welfare (Comparatively) and minority perks, same as US blacks and Hispanics. But of course they are Pakistanis so they hate Jews.

    American never had substantial Muslim immigration. So the Jewish have always been Left.
    , @Anonymous
    I am unimpressed with your whole antisemite trope. Jews or useful gentiles which you seem to be, see antisemitism everywhere. You could just as easily say that UK leftists hate the Chinese because of trade issues or that they are racist against Russians because of hysteria in the UK press.

    How bout you not treat Jews as if they are a special class of people to be coddled like retarded children. In any group, there will be people who do not like others. That does not make a movement antisemitic.

    As far as the holocaust, I have to admit that seeing contemporary Jews like so much in the media has me feeling skeptical about what happened in WW2. But I also have no motivation to believe what happened then until Jews acknowledge the modern day holocaust happening in Palestine which has caused at least as many deaths.
    , @Anatoly Karlin
    Leftists, as blank slate opponents of "privilege", should be more anti-Semitic than right-wingers by default. Anything else is dishonest.
    , @James N. Kennett
    I agree with all of this.

    There are many aspects of Corbyn's leadership that are problematic, but it does not pose an "existential threat" to Jews in Britain or anywhere else.

    It seems to me that the "internationally accepted" definition of anti-semitism is far too broad. It forbids, for example,


    claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor
     
    so anyone who believes (as the mass-immigration crowd does) that all nation-states are racist endeavours, is automatically an anti-semite. This might seem to be an unreasonably pedantic observation, but it is similar in character to the exchange between Corbyn and the Board of Deputies of British Jews, in which Corbyn "sprang into life with a ‘convulsion’ when told his support for ‘two state solution’ in the rift between Israel and Palestine meant he was a ‘Zionist'".

    The definition of anti-semitism also forbids


    Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
     
    When this insult is applied to Labour politician Margaret Hodge, with no particular evidence, it is obviously anti-semitic. When it is applied to Paul Wolfowitz, architect of the Iraq war, it might actually be true!

    The Jewish Chronicle will keep pushing because Labour does harbour a great deal of anti-semitism. Jeremy Corbyn himself is afflicted with full-blown Radical Chic syndrome: he regards Hamas, Hezbollah, and the (pre-ceasefire) Provisional IRA as his "friends", and he allegedly supported the release from prison of Abdul Aziz Umar, the organizer of a suicide bombing in Jerusalem in 2003 that killed seven people:

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/londoners-diary/the-londoner-corbyn-defended-hamas-brother-a3899281.html


    Umar was charged with providing a safe house for the terrorists and guarding the property as they fitted the bomber with a suicide belt. He was released a year before his Press TV appearance as part of the prisoner swap arranged to release Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

    “You have to ask the question why they are in prison in the first place,” said the now Labour leader. “I’m glad that those who were released were released.”
     

    Part of Corbyn's problem is that he never expected to become Labour leader, so he never bothered to hold his tongue: he let the world know what he really thinks. Nobody else expected him to become leader either, and so for example he has not passed through the British-American Project’s vetting procedure. Even if he were squeaky-clean, there would be moves to depose him. But he is not squeaky-clean, and his affinity for terrorist killers makes him an easy target.

    The leaked account of Jeremy Corbyn's meeting with the Board of Deputies concluded that he was ‘too unemotional or too stupid’ to understand claims that he has failed to combat anti-Semitism in the Labour Party. I think they are right.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  38. @Intelligent Dasein

    So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.
     
    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion---mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever "the holocaust" may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice "victim"---Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you---is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    Ask any “unclean meat” – the real meaning of the kosher slander “goyim,” what it is like to be under their subjugation and harassment for a generation. Be it in, as Reverend Jesse Jackson appropriately labeled “Hymie Town” or a Palestinian confined to the open air death camp of Gaza – ask any of us our thoughts of the Holocaust™ – I assure you it is not as a “horror story” but a complete fabrication. Had it been real, a perfectly understandable solution likely too inefficient and lacking enough prosecutorial conviction to cure a long unchecked spreading malignancy.

    Until an unclean meat has prolonged interactions with the tribe, they cannot understand the all encompassing malevolence. No opportunity is spared to terrorize the goyim, no opportunity is spared in viciously attacking children, reputations, property and person. “Antisemitism” is the projection by jews onto every other people of what they themselves are guilty of doing to every other people.

    No act of Christian kindness is ever repaid in anything but slanderous calumnies, opportunistic profit and malignant manipulations – the embodiment of the shabbas goyim. A goyim represents an opportunity to practice thousands of years of Talmudic methodology of dehumanizing and victimizing outsiders.

    Jews Must Live and Now and Forever by Samuel Roth http://www.jrbooksonline.com/roth.htm was a complete admission of this by a disgusted jew.

    “The next time you read about a particularly bloody pogrom and pause to wonder how Christians, dedicated to a religion of mercy, can exercise so much brutality against the Jews, remember that the Jew wheedles all the mercy out of his neighbors in the ordinary course of business. He lies and cheats until he is caught. When caught, instead of accepting punishment, he moans and tears his hair, invokes the sores of ancestors in their graves and living relations at the point of death in hospitals, until the wronged gentile, nauseated, lets him go. Then, thumbing his nose at the gentile behind his back, the Jew goes about his business the same way, lying and cheating now doubly to make up for lost time. A pogrom is usually the climax of years of such relentless goading. Do you wonder that when the final reckoning comes the gentile is absolutely merciless?”
                –  Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live, Ch. 13, p. 206, f/n 31

    Read More
    • Agree: Druid, Kolo
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. “Eventually, these two combined trends may take a complex and possibly very mixed historical record and transform it into a simple morality-play, with innocent Jews tremendously injured by vicious Jew-haters.”

    This same dynamic has occurred with the historiography of the Spanish Civil War – the dominant narrative written and promulgated by the Left

    Eventually, these two combined trends may take a complex and possibly very mixed historical record and transform it into a simple morality-play, with innocent [democracy-loving-Republicans] tremendously injured by vicious [Francoist-Fascists].

    See: http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2017/10/has-spanish-civil-war-ended.html

    http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2015/05/santiago-carrillo-last-stalinist_51.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  40. Real K5 says:
    @utu
    OMG, RU compared Jews to uranium.

    It is a metaphor and it works

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. @renfro
    Unz has given us a accurate, dispassionate summation on what is called anti Semitism.
    Well done.

    I am curious how those here who dislike Jews came to that dislike. From comments it seems that Jewish 'politics' (interference in US policies & Israel) and their control of most of our press, media (the censorship, slants and lowering of social and moral standards) are the two main complaints.
    For me it grew after I began a study of the Mid East post 911 and came across a section about Zionism in the ME in the British National Archives. That led me back to the US and the Jewish lobby and thru Jewish activities in the US beginning even before 1948. I absolutely did not want to believe that a Jewish or any other 'cabal' was controlling much of our government....but that is the way the cookie crumbled on the facts. And these 'facts' did not come from books, they came from months and months and months, years actually, of combing thru documents at the Library of Congress, every bill and resolution passed dealing with Jewish interest and Israel, every presidential library, all the MOUs and declassified documents and on and on.

    The only question I have had since then is what do we do about it? We have to end Jewish entitlement in the US before we can end the unholy US-Israel relationship.

    One thing I want to add to this:


    So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger.
     
    Is that the ordinary Jews will never stand up to the Fifth Column Jews because even the ordinary Jews benefit too much from the uber Jews hold on our government. I could go on and on about the many special favors US Jews get, the 90% of Homeland Security funds, the extra social services government money awarded 'only' to Jewish organizations, .....I could fill this entre site with all the gifts congress has given to the Jews courtesy of US taxpayers. You can even find awards to Jewish groups in various politicians 'earmarks' for gawds sake.....people have no idea, none at all about how truly deep they go into our tax money thru every agency in the US. It even involves 'promoting Jews' , as when Schumer several years ago required the pentagon to review records of all Jews serving in WWII and come up with some 'heroes' who didn't get medals because of anti semitism.

    I would love to see Ron put his extra sharp mind to some research and do an article on this alone.

    Bottom line the Jews aren't going to give up their special benefits. But maybe if enough 'ordinary Americans' learn that they are 'not special and are third class citizens' below the Entitled Jews they will rise up and get loud.

    ” So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger. ”

    Who made this statement when ?
    Quite ordinary ways.
    Depends on what one sees as ordinary.

    Spinoza was thrown out of the Dutch sephardic community because he brought a business conflict to a Dutch judge, in stead of letting the rabbi decide.
    Both Solsjenytsyn and Hödl describe how jewish communities fought for their autonomy, resisted assimilation.
    Both German and Russian jews dodged military service, though in WWI many jews did fight in the German army.

    Present day Muslims not all of them, behave in a similar way in NW Europe.
    There simply seems to be a loyalty conflict.
    In an undercover tv report on Muslims in Denmark, from mosques, one could hear the sentence ‘w’re not Danes, w’re Muslims’.
    Sharia law was practiced in the mosques, as it is in present GB.

    About the other side of the ledger, Baruch describes his years supporting FDR as ‘Public Years’.
    He does not excuse himself in this autobiography.
    I’m quite sure that Soros is equally convinced of doing the right thing.
    So, I fear, for most jews there is no other side of the ledger.
    Bernard M. Baruch, ‘Die Jahre des Dienens’, München 1962 (The public years, New York, 1960)
    The german title is even more explicit ‘the years of service’.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    Who made this statement when ?
     
    Ron made it in this article.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. @JohnnyWalker123

    the media-emitters of a society can have an enormous impact
     

    A cohesive, organized group generally possesses huge advantages over a teeming mass of atomized individuals, just as a Macedonian Phalanx could easily defeat a vastly larger body of disorganized infantry.

     


    To the extent that the ideological emanations from our centralized media organs serve to strengthen and protect Jewish cohesion while attacking and dissolving any similar cohesion on the part of their Gentile counterparts, the former will obviously gain enormous advantages in resource-competition against the latter.
     
    These three statements represent very important ideas that I've been thinking about lately.

    1. Control the media and you can control what the society believes.
    2. Social atomization and hyper-individuality make a group relatively weak against a more socially unified group.
    3. Group competition is mostly about resource competition. Groups compete for resources.

    You seem to be saying that Jews want to weaken gentile unity (while maintaining Jewish cohesiveness). If gentiles are atomized/divided and Jews are united, Jews can more easily dominate lucrative resource niches and thrive as a tribe. Almost like a divide and conquer strategy.

    I witness the kosher media apparatus along with its tendrils into the judiciary every single day. Tribal crimes are ignored in the media and their tendrils in the judiciary pull the strings in keeping the tribesman out of secular courts. Whereas goyim are viciously attacked in the media and scapegoated by the courts for far less than what their kosher masters do as entitlements.

    The only way to increase the power and wealth of an already unified and wealthy group is for that group to lord over broken and looted peoples. Breaking gentile eggs yields a bigger kosher omelet.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  43. @dearieme
    'Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, describing it as an “existential threat” to the Jewish community for the anti-Semitism it was fostering.'

    You need to tread carefully here. Corbyn's far left mob seems indeed to include numerous anti-semites. I first noticed the strange business of leftie anti-semitism in the shower who took control of the Labour Party and the City Council in Dundee some decades ago. There is doubtless additionally what I might call 'calculated anti-semitism' i.e. an attempt to encourage moslems to the polls.

    And yet I agree with Labour's refusal to be foisted with somebody else's definition of anti-semitism, which definition looks to me to be a blatant attempt to censor political criticism of Israel. On a more rational, narrower definition, the Corbynistas still seem substantially anti-semitic to me, so the argument about definitions ought to be redundant. But because it is actually about Israel it is still pursued.

    On the internet I have been subject to accusations of anti-semitism. That's because I am disinclined to toe the Israeli line on the history of Palestine and Israel/Palestine. Interestingly I have no memory of being accused of anti-semitism when I have opined that everything important in the Old Testament is absurd fiction. So the key matter seems to be politics - modern Israel - not Judaism.

    As for 'Holocaust Denial', it's foolish or wicked to deny that Jews were murdered, presumably by the millions. No doubt lies have been told by members of the Holocaust Industry but that doesn't mean that the slaughter didn't happen. Making 'Holocaust Denial' a crime seems to me foolish or wicked too. As ever, the world is well provided with folly and evil.

    ” but that doesn’t mean that the slaughter didn’t happen ”
    Dying after six months in a concentration camp because of undernourishment, caused by the autonomous camp self management, that ate three times as much as the non members, slaughter ?
    In case you reject what is described by camp inmates, read what Poliakov describes about the Warsaw ghetto, exactly the same.
    Léon Poliakov, ‘Bréviaire de la Haine, Le IIIe Reich et les Juifs’, 1951, 1974, Paris

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  44. Jews are syphilis to a society, they first attack through the sex organs ie promiscuity, prostitution – promotion of perversion and degeneracy. They then attack the organs – entering the courts, the schools – Finally in end stage syphilitic infection their infection enters the brain destroying the society’s perception of itself afflicting its cognitive ability and rendering it an invalid carted off to a hospice

    Read More
    • Replies: @Kolo
    Agree
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. @dearieme
    'Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, describing it as an “existential threat” to the Jewish community for the anti-Semitism it was fostering.'

    You need to tread carefully here. Corbyn's far left mob seems indeed to include numerous anti-semites. I first noticed the strange business of leftie anti-semitism in the shower who took control of the Labour Party and the City Council in Dundee some decades ago. There is doubtless additionally what I might call 'calculated anti-semitism' i.e. an attempt to encourage moslems to the polls.

    And yet I agree with Labour's refusal to be foisted with somebody else's definition of anti-semitism, which definition looks to me to be a blatant attempt to censor political criticism of Israel. On a more rational, narrower definition, the Corbynistas still seem substantially anti-semitic to me, so the argument about definitions ought to be redundant. But because it is actually about Israel it is still pursued.

    On the internet I have been subject to accusations of anti-semitism. That's because I am disinclined to toe the Israeli line on the history of Palestine and Israel/Palestine. Interestingly I have no memory of being accused of anti-semitism when I have opined that everything important in the Old Testament is absurd fiction. So the key matter seems to be politics - modern Israel - not Judaism.

    As for 'Holocaust Denial', it's foolish or wicked to deny that Jews were murdered, presumably by the millions. No doubt lies have been told by members of the Holocaust Industry but that doesn't mean that the slaughter didn't happen. Making 'Holocaust Denial' a crime seems to me foolish or wicked too. As ever, the world is well provided with folly and evil.

    English Left vs. US Left

    Pakistani Brits will naturally veer towards the Left for the generous welfare (Comparatively) and minority perks, same as US blacks and Hispanics. But of course they are Pakistanis so they hate Jews.

    American never had substantial Muslim immigration. So the Jewish have always been Left.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Moi
    It seems to me Jews are like the Indian Brahmins who want to keep control of the lower castes/peoples.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  46. mcohen says:
    @Wally
    Unz said:
    "... the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them."

    The absolute best examples of that are the fake '6M Jews and gas chambers", forgetting for the moment the equally fraudulent '5M others' used by Jews to essentially buy votes for their agenda.

    It's quite bizarre that Jews actually want 6M Jews to be dead. Revisionists bring Jews good news. Jews should be elated to know that 6,000,000 of their brethren were not murdered.

    Truth can no longer be stopped. Regardless of "Holocau$t Industry" lies, their religion does not hold up to scientific, rational scrutiny.

    Be part of the solution:
    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    gimme a wally

    Hohohohohoho at codoh

    Read More
    • Replies: @Prester John
    I assume this is garden variety black subkultcha.

    Talk about reinforcing stereotypes!
    , @Wally
    Yep, another True Believer, mcohen, bites the dust. That's his best shot.
    recommended:
    The Counter Terminology to Holocaust Denial Should Be Holocaust Belief, by Carolyn Yeager: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11899
    exc.:
    "Just as with any religion, obedience to it's dogma makes one a Believer, a faithful True Believer.
    Since there are no verifiable, actual, provable facts or physical evidence to hold onto, the Believer clings to faith & faith alone.

    Just look at the intentionally misleading make-believe theatrical lighting & staging, embarrassing actually":
    http://carolynyeager.net/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/auschwitz_3180334b.jpg?itok=ovrF2gnU

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  47. Kingfelix says:

    The feedback loop described, whereby a new generation of zealots build upon the work of the previous generation is apposite. I would add to this the fact that, in my personal experience (interacting with Jewish professors at a university bookstore), Jews appear to discount the opinions/guidance/facts furnished of non-Jews to the point where one would often feel invisible and mute, as one’s answers to queries were discounted, while the same response from another Jew would be heard clearly and acknowledged. This, and variations upon it, was a more or less regular occurrence.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sic Semper
    What you say is absolutely true! In the Fall of 1995 I was a senior in Brooklyn College and taking a seminar in American politics, the day Yitzak Rabin was sent to Jesus. The professor was of course a tribe member - Kahan was his surname. A large percentage of the class of course was tribe as well - but not all, approximately 60% were not kosher.
    This professor dedicates the entire class into a weeping session for a dead israeli - having nothing to do with the class - when one jew said to the professor that you know "some" of the students were not jewish and perhaps the lecture should be on the study material - he said "no"... and continued to hold the unclean meat students hostage to his mourning.

    As always once they make up percentages larger than their societal representations they take control over every dynamic and hold the host population in contemptuous disdain and silence.

    Incidentally, this same professor was quoted in Time Magazine in 1994 as saying American students would have no job prospects in the United States and should look overseas - that he was most certainly correct on.

    , @JackOH
    Kingfelix, yep. "Are you Jewish?", a Jewish businessman asked me. I guess I presented as intellectually aggressive and verbal. Nope, I replied. He stayed friendly, but it's a sure bet I missed something of an opportunity that would have been open had I offered the "right" answer.

    I may have mentioned here when I first noted my "are you Jewish?" story that I've grossly overestimated talent alone as a determinant of hiring, interviews, advancement, and what-not, and grossly underestimated familial and ethnic ties, the whole mess of other human bonds and attributes, plus affirmative action as "helper" or "clincher" determinants.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. lavoisier says: • Website

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    Read More
    • Agree: Dan Hayes
    • Replies: @Prester John
    A price has to be paid for honesty though i.e. Mr. Unz won't be getting any invites from the NYT to do an op-ed piece anytime soon. On the other hand, that's a badge of honor and worth the price.
    , @Gordo

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.
     
    Very much so.
    , @cassandra

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.
     
    This site is a breath of fresh air from an opened window.
    , @anon
    Hear hear. If more Jews were as honest and open to self-critique as Ron Unz they wouldn't have been so distrusted throughout history. As it is, he is a rare bird. One in 15 million. Cheers to Ron, for this article and this awesome website.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Lot says:

    “cries of “anti-Semite” soon appeared, and according to Google there are now over 180,000 such hits combining her name and that harsh accusatory term. ”

    There are also 186,000 Google results combining her name with the word “ducks.”

    What does that prove?

    Read More
    • Replies: @David
    Good rhetoric but upon searching the two strings, in the case of anti-semite, the word or a closely related one actually appears in the hits, whereas with ducks, no hit (out of the first 8 or 10) actually contains the word duck, unless in a link to another, unrelated article.
    , @Johnny Rico
    Everything you want. Dude, technology is amazing. It basically means the United States is looking more and more like Orwell's vision of the future in 1984. But with smartphones and flavored iced coffee.
    , @Ace
    Answer: That your search terms need to be revised.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. Benedetti says:

    A ‘conservative’ website recently ran a series of articles on antisemitism. Contrary to the usual practice at this site comments were not allowed for these daily antisemitism pieces by various authors.
    One of these pieces was deploring antisemitic conspiracy theories at the beginning. Near the end of the piece the author wrote that Jews have to get more control of the media and educational system to fight antisemitism. Kind of ironic.

    Read More
    • LOL: Mike P
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  51. @Intelligent Dasein

    So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.
     
    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion---mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever "the holocaust" may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice "victim"---Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you---is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    That’s a great insight.

    Read More
    • Replies: @utu
    That's not an insight. And insight requires something to exist. This is a construction by our wannabe Freud, you idiot, who, btw, also is an idiot.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Cleburne says:
    @Patricus
    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can't find any.

    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can’t find any.

    At the risk of speaking for Mr Unz, I believe his point was you have to look at the Toaff book, as I did. The book (rather pdf, which I obtained via the usual samizdat channels) is incredibly dry/scholarly/detailed/non-hysterial, examines cases in medieval Germany and Italy and makes the careful case that the “blood libel” is likely not a “libel” at all.

    And no, I don’t think you’d find an account of Toaff’s book, much less a summary of the cases he mentions, on the internet or elsewhere.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. Cleburne says:
    @Sally Snyder
    As shown in this article, there is a significant difference in how American Jews and non-Jews view the state of Israel:

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2018/06/who-backs-israel.html

    White evangelical Christians' support for the Jewish possession of Israel is higher than for any other religious group other than modern orthodox Jews and is nearly twice the level of religious Jewish support for the concept of a God-given promise of a Jewish homeland.

    White evangelical Christians’ support for the Jewish possession of Israel is higher than for any other religious group other than modern orthodox Jews and is nearly twice the level of religious Jewish support for the concept of a God-given promise of a Jewish homeland.

    Dispensationalism (for which we can thank Mr Scofield’s footnotes for the most part) is without a doubt the most successful heresy Christendom has ever produced.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. fnn says:

    Now consider the notion of “anti-Semitism.” Google searches for that word and its close variants reveal over 24 million hits, and over the years I’m sure I’ve seen that term tens of thousands of times in my books and newspapers, and heard it endlessly reported in my electronic media and entertainment. But thinking it over, I’m not sure that I can ever recall a single real-life instance I’ve personally encountered, nor have I heard of almost any such cases from my friends or acquaintances. Indeed, the only persons I’ve ever come across making such claims were individuals who bore unmistakable signs of serious psychological imbalance. When the daily newspapers are brimming with lurid tales of hideous demons walking among us and attacking people on every street corner, but you yourself have never actually seen one, you may gradually grow suspicious.

    Moldbug:

    https://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2013/09/technology-communism-and-brown-scare.html

    It’s actually not hard to explain the Brown Scare. Like all witch hunts, it’s built on a conspiracy theory. The Red Scare was based on a conspiracy theory too, but at least it was a real conspiracy with real witches – two of whom were my father’s parents. (The nicest people on earth, as people. I like to think of them not as worshipping Stalin, but worshipping what they thought Stalin was.) Moreover, the Red Scare was a largely demotic or peasant phenomenon to which America’s governing intellectual classes were, for obvious reasons, immune. Because power works and culture is downstream from politics – real politics, at least – the Red Scare soon faded into a joke.

    As a mainstream conspiracy theory, fully in the institutional saddle, the Brown Scare is far greater and more terrifying. Unfortunately no central statistics are kept, but I wouldn’t be surprised if every day in America, more racists, fascists and sexists are detected, purged and destroyed, than all the screenwriters who had to prosper under pseudonyms in the ’50s. Indeed it’s not an exaggeration to say that hundreds of thousands of Americans, perhaps even a million, are employed in one arm or another of this ideological apparatus. Cleaning it up will require a genuine cultural revolution – or a cultural reaction, anyway. Hey, Americans, I’m ready whenever you are.

    The logic of the witch hunter is simple. It has hardly changed since Matthew Hopkins’ day. The first requirement is to invert the reality of power. Power at its most basic level is the power to harm or destroy other human beings. The obvious reality is that witch hunters gang up and destroy witches. Whereas witches are never, ever seen to gang up and destroy witch hunters. By this test alone, we can see that the conspiracy is imaginary (Brown Scare) rather than real (Red Scare).

    Think about it. Obviously, if the witches had any power whatsoever, they wouldn’t waste their time gallivanting around on broomsticks, fellating Satan and cursing cows with sour milk. They’re getting burned right and left, for Christ’s sake! Priorities! No, they’d turn the tables and lay some serious voodoo on the witch-hunters. In a country where anyone who speaks out against the witches is soon found dangling by his heels from an oak at midnight with his head shrunk to the size of a baseball, we won’t see a lot of witch-hunting and we know there’s a serious witch problem. In a country where witch-hunting is a stable and lucrative career, and also an amateur pastime enjoyed by millions of hobbyists on the weekend, we know there are no real witches worth a damn.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    Pretty interesting approach to this issue!!
    , @Skeptikal
    Funny!
    What is the Brown Scare?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. nickels says:

    “Anti-semitism” is merely the enforcement wing of Jewish hegemony against moral argument. Anywhere jew power uses injustice, pointing that out becomes anti-semitic.
    The jew, unlike the dullard goyim, undetstands the power of the moral force, despite the fact they work fully against it’s dictates.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  56. Anonymous[329] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Patricus
    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can't find any.

    http://cwporter.com/toaff.htm

    Discusses some of the reviews of and links to Toaff’s book Blood Passover as well as other thoughts. Poster (Porter?) is undecided.

    Either way, although the subject is fascinating, its veracity is hardly a key component of the greater discussions Mr. Unz recent articles have ignited.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Patricus
    I clicked on the site and read commentaries on Toaff's work including specific examples of convicted Jewish perpetrators. Every conviction mentioned involves torture. Today no court allows lie detector tests as evidence in a court trial. Torture is beyond the pale today and invalidates any confession. I find it hard to give credence to a torture induced confession today or in centuries past. I would like to learn of a case where there is better evidence than that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  57. @Kingfelix
    The feedback loop described, whereby a new generation of zealots build upon the work of the previous generation is apposite. I would add to this the fact that, in my personal experience (interacting with Jewish professors at a university bookstore), Jews appear to discount the opinions/guidance/facts furnished of non-Jews to the point where one would often feel invisible and mute, as one's answers to queries were discounted, while the same response from another Jew would be heard clearly and acknowledged. This, and variations upon it, was a more or less regular occurrence.

    What you say is absolutely true! In the Fall of 1995 I was a senior in Brooklyn College and taking a seminar in American politics, the day Yitzak Rabin was sent to Jesus. The professor was of course a tribe member – Kahan was his surname. A large percentage of the class of course was tribe as well – but not all, approximately 60% were not kosher.
    This professor dedicates the entire class into a weeping session for a dead israeli – having nothing to do with the class – when one jew said to the professor that you know “some” of the students were not jewish and perhaps the lecture should be on the study material – he said “no”… and continued to hold the unclean meat students hostage to his mourning.

    As always once they make up percentages larger than their societal representations they take control over every dynamic and hold the host population in contemptuous disdain and silence.

    Incidentally, this same professor was quoted in Time Magazine in 1994 as saying American students would have no job prospects in the United States and should look overseas – that he was most certainly correct on.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    He was right about the job market. But few young people have the initiative to move overseas or adapt. They'd rather remain in the city in post-industrial decline waiting for the economy to "come back".

    Which it never did.

    I'd have never done anything in my field if I had remained in Detroit.
    , @Sic Semper
    Another example of being held ideologically hostage occurred in 1994 in a class lectured by Iranian Hostage crisis survivor Barry Rosen, the image of him being blindfolded and held hostage was the graphic accompanying every newscast for the year and a half the crisis continued.

    Rosen taught an Iran module and was very fair in his depiction of the country and even-handed regarding his treatment as a hostage. Near the end of the semester he brought an Iranian diplomat in to speak to the class - It was truly fascinating.

    I vividly remember one jew in the class wearing his yarmaluke and kippah who obnoxiously slept the entire class and made grunting noises and loudly sighed the entire time. He quickly awoke during the opportunity to ask questions - of which he raised his hand and DEMANDED to know why Iran was HOSTILE to israel. Now, this person gave zero respect to the speaker and the lecture was not on Iranian foreign policy, all of it pertained to the nation's history avoiding anything remotely divisive or combative - israel was not mentioned once by the guest speaker - the speaker politely explained that israel was also hostile to Iran and shied away from any further discussion of geopolitics. With that the disrespectful student who had accomplished his grandstanding got up and stormed violently out of the classroom.

    I remember the feelings of disgust I had at witnessing the matter. The diplomat was not politically posturing, put no one on notice and was not hostile even to the person who attacked him. It was a disgusting attempt at holding hostage a classroom lecture on history with the witnesses to it.

    Just once I would love to see a similar act on a "holocaust survivor" -

    Hijacking discussions at every opportunity is another hallmark.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. On our local cable outlet there is a network that is devoted solely to matters of concern to Jewish people. Fine. Except for one thing: the obsession with the Holocaust. It is not healthy, either on the individual level or on the collective level, to obsess over dark events in life. Unless of course some benefit is derived. And in the case of the Holocaust there seems to be no end to this obsession. Which suggests that Finkelstein, known to be Alan Dershowitz’ “bete noir”, may be right after all–there really IS a “Holocaust industry”!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  59. @mcohen
    gimme a wally

    Hohohohohoho at codoh

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2wXH8m34-js

    I assume this is garden variety black subkultcha.

    Talk about reinforcing stereotypes!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian
    Usual stream-of-consciousness. I may agree with something with the author, disagree with him on other points, but- he has not stressed enough that "classical Jew" is alien to the West & there is no way of ignoring that (assimilated Jews are something different & they would need a separate & more nuanced analysis).

    “the Hebrews, a very recent people…an Arab horde”.

    Voltaire, referring to the Jews in op. cit., “Genèse”.

    “The Jewish people is and remains in Europe an Asiatic people alien to our part of the world”

    Johann Gottfried Herder
    , “Behkerung der Juden”,

    “The Jew is the enemy of the human race. This race must be sent back to Asia or exterminated”.

    Pierre Joseph Proudhon, “Selected Writings of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon”

    “The Palestinians living among us have, for the most part, earned a not-unfounded reputation for being cheaters, because of their spirit of usury since their exile. Certainly, it seems strange to conceive of a nation of cheaters; but it is just as odd to think of a nation of merchants, the great majority of whom, bound by an ancient superstition that is recognized by the State they live in, seek no civil dignity and try to make up for this loss by the advantage of duping the people among whom they find refuge, and even one another. The situation could not be otherwise, given a whole nation of merchants, as non-productive members of society (for example, the Jews in Poland). So their constitution, which is sanctioned by ancient precepts and even by the people among whom they live (since we have certain sacred writings in common with them), cannot consistently be abolished — even though the supreme principle of their morality in trading with us is “Let the buyer beware.” I shall not engage in the futile undertaking of lecturing to these people, in terms of morality, about cheating and honesty. Instead, I shall present my conjectures about the origin of this peculiar constitution (the constitution, namely, of a nation of merchants).”

    Immanuel Kant, from “Anthropology from the Pragmatic Viewpoint”

    Contempt for theory, art, history, and for man as an end in himself, which is contained in an abstract form in the Jewish religion, is the real, conscious standpoint, the virtue of the man of money. The species-relation itself, the relation between man and woman, etc., becomes an object of trade! The woman is bought and sold.

    The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.

    Karl Marx, On the Jewish Question

    The pompous Bardon Kaldian babbling about something again. When he isn’t bragging about his supposed high IQ he is calling out people as antisemites and thinking up strange convoluted reasons why the Jews are never wrong and are always victims.

    This whole classical Jew vs assimilated Jew argument is laughable. In other words the kind of Jew that is causing all the problems are a tiny, tiny segment of all Jews. And once they are assimilated, it is nothing but apple pie and baseball. Might as well import all the Jews world wide so we can assimilate them lol. Well the problem with that is we know that even assimilated Jews, like presumably you, more often than not have similar character flaws. So it is a moot point.

    You can also say that the problems with black people are not from black people per se but an issue of classical blacks vs assimilated blacks. Or there is no Muslim problem, there are classical muslims vs assimilated muslims. But you would laugh at those examples no?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. nagra says:

    (if I may)

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    (They) want more of (Them) to return to (their homeland) so the plot conceived by (Them) to import Muslims who hate (Them) is a secret (Z-conspiracy) plot.

    Sorry, its the Freemasons. They're Jews too.
    , @Druid
    You're right about many immigrant Moslems to your country,nut your defense and outcry on behalf of the Talmudists is pure stupidity!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. @lavoisier
    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    A price has to be paid for honesty though i.e. Mr. Unz won’t be getting any invites from the NYT to do an op-ed piece anytime soon. On the other hand, that’s a badge of honor and worth the price.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  63. Gordo says:
    @lavoisier
    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    Very much so.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Anonymous[329] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Patricus
    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can't find any.

    http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/jewish_sacrifice.htm

    This page cites 40 or more historical jewish ritual murders (usually of Christians) including those of children. Many sources are cited all the way to antiquity. Search the page for “Herodotus”. The list begins there.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Heros
    Wow Wow Wow! Incredible.

    Aside from all the documented ritual blood sacrifices throughout history, what is a revelation is that it proves that this is still going on today on a massive scale:


    "Abortion has become an overt means of child sacrifice which Jews have instituted under their defacto law. A more covert means of {Christian} child sacrifice has been by their infamous 'ritual murders, which Jews have been accused through the ages.' In this practice 'the blood of the sacrificed gentile {Christian Child} is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.'"
     
    We know that Kevin Okeefe exposed Planned Parenthood for selling parts of aborted fetuses. I wonder if the jew PP organization might have got the idea to extract 100% of the blood from these fetuses and sell it on for us in Purim rituals? Naa, jews have morals. Thats what all the jews on unz keep telling us anyway.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjCs_gvImyw

    Then they also say this:


    "Typical was the case of Jan Masaryk, the President of Czechoslovakia.

    Masaryk was an obscure lawyer when the body of Agnez Hruza was found in Bohemia in 1899.
    A Jew named Hilsner confessed to the murder and implicated two other Jews.
    Nevertheless, a new trial was ordered. Dr. Baxa, attorney for the murdered girl's mother, who was seeking justice in this case, made a speech in the Bohemian Diet, or Parliament, December 28, 1899, accusing the Government of having shown extreme partiality to the Jews in this case. A second body was found, that of Maria Klima, who had also been murdered with a ritual knife which was found in Hilsner's possession.

    Hilsner's defending counsel at this trial was Jan Masaryk. At the Versailles Peace Conference, twenty years later, the Jews showed their gratitude by making a new nation, Czechoslovakia, and appointing Masaryk President, with the title, founder of Czechoslovakia. Throughout his life, Masaryk was an eager and willing tool of Jewish leaders."
     

    Suddenly we understand why the jews in Czechoslovakia were tormenting, murdering and likely even bloodletting the Sudeten Germans. This is how the jews started WWII, by killing and murdering Christians and then projecting their crime back on some other innocent but stupid goyim. But also it was all based on the cover up of a jewish ritual blood sacrifice. Amazing, the coverup is always worse.

    There is sooo much more in the document:


    "Because the city of Chicago is a center of Jewish financial power, and is completely controlled by the Jews, some of the most flagrant cases of ritual murder of Christian children have occurred there in recent years. Chicago is said to have become one of the world centers of the supply of children's blood used in Jewish rites. The Chief of Police admitted that three hundred children disappear each month in Chicago, but he claims that they are all "runaways." it is odd that these runaways never turn up, either in Chicago or anywhere else. In October, 1955, the rash of ritual murder cases was at a height when the bodies of two Schuessler boys, a Peterson boy, and the two Grimes girls were discovered."
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. @Sic Semper
    What you say is absolutely true! In the Fall of 1995 I was a senior in Brooklyn College and taking a seminar in American politics, the day Yitzak Rabin was sent to Jesus. The professor was of course a tribe member - Kahan was his surname. A large percentage of the class of course was tribe as well - but not all, approximately 60% were not kosher.
    This professor dedicates the entire class into a weeping session for a dead israeli - having nothing to do with the class - when one jew said to the professor that you know "some" of the students were not jewish and perhaps the lecture should be on the study material - he said "no"... and continued to hold the unclean meat students hostage to his mourning.

    As always once they make up percentages larger than their societal representations they take control over every dynamic and hold the host population in contemptuous disdain and silence.

    Incidentally, this same professor was quoted in Time Magazine in 1994 as saying American students would have no job prospects in the United States and should look overseas - that he was most certainly correct on.

    He was right about the job market. But few young people have the initiative to move overseas or adapt. They’d rather remain in the city in post-industrial decline waiting for the economy to “come back”.

    Which it never did.

    I’d have never done anything in my field if I had remained in Detroit.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. @Sic Semper
    What you say is absolutely true! In the Fall of 1995 I was a senior in Brooklyn College and taking a seminar in American politics, the day Yitzak Rabin was sent to Jesus. The professor was of course a tribe member - Kahan was his surname. A large percentage of the class of course was tribe as well - but not all, approximately 60% were not kosher.
    This professor dedicates the entire class into a weeping session for a dead israeli - having nothing to do with the class - when one jew said to the professor that you know "some" of the students were not jewish and perhaps the lecture should be on the study material - he said "no"... and continued to hold the unclean meat students hostage to his mourning.

    As always once they make up percentages larger than their societal representations they take control over every dynamic and hold the host population in contemptuous disdain and silence.

    Incidentally, this same professor was quoted in Time Magazine in 1994 as saying American students would have no job prospects in the United States and should look overseas - that he was most certainly correct on.

    Another example of being held ideologically hostage occurred in 1994 in a class lectured by Iranian Hostage crisis survivor Barry Rosen, the image of him being blindfolded and held hostage was the graphic accompanying every newscast for the year and a half the crisis continued.

    Rosen taught an Iran module and was very fair in his depiction of the country and even-handed regarding his treatment as a hostage. Near the end of the semester he brought an Iranian diplomat in to speak to the class – It was truly fascinating.

    I vividly remember one jew in the class wearing his yarmaluke and kippah who obnoxiously slept the entire class and made grunting noises and loudly sighed the entire time. He quickly awoke during the opportunity to ask questions – of which he raised his hand and DEMANDED to know why Iran was HOSTILE to israel. Now, this person gave zero respect to the speaker and the lecture was not on Iranian foreign policy, all of it pertained to the nation’s history avoiding anything remotely divisive or combative – israel was not mentioned once by the guest speaker – the speaker politely explained that israel was also hostile to Iran and shied away from any further discussion of geopolitics. With that the disrespectful student who had accomplished his grandstanding got up and stormed violently out of the classroom.

    I remember the feelings of disgust I had at witnessing the matter. The diplomat was not politically posturing, put no one on notice and was not hostile even to the person who attacked him. It was a disgusting attempt at holding hostage a classroom lecture on history with the witnesses to it.

    Just once I would love to see a similar act on a “holocaust survivor” –

    Hijacking discussions at every opportunity is another hallmark.

    Read More
    • Agree: RobinG
    • Replies: @Heros

    "Hijacking discussions"
     
    The problem is that if you scale up "discussions" you come to "narratives", and yes they have been hijacked. This jewish hijacking of the narrative, like many of the things they have imposed on us, has been done patiently and salami style: slice by slice.

    Jews always like to run to the boss, or the person of most authority. Where you or I would go through channels, escalating things properly so that the system can work smoothly, the jew looks for some vulnerable higher level goyim or another heeb in authority, and immediately jumps the queue.

    Do you think that judea is being ruled by a Frankist/Sabattean cult?

    , @A guy in Germany
    My sisters and I all attended the University of Delaware. There was a very imminent history professor there by the name of Dr. Raymond Wolters. Unfortunately, I never had him, but my sisters did. They both told a tale of two Jewish women constantly contradicting everything he said in class. He wasn't a progressive.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @dearieme
    'Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, describing it as an “existential threat” to the Jewish community for the anti-Semitism it was fostering.'

    You need to tread carefully here. Corbyn's far left mob seems indeed to include numerous anti-semites. I first noticed the strange business of leftie anti-semitism in the shower who took control of the Labour Party and the City Council in Dundee some decades ago. There is doubtless additionally what I might call 'calculated anti-semitism' i.e. an attempt to encourage moslems to the polls.

    And yet I agree with Labour's refusal to be foisted with somebody else's definition of anti-semitism, which definition looks to me to be a blatant attempt to censor political criticism of Israel. On a more rational, narrower definition, the Corbynistas still seem substantially anti-semitic to me, so the argument about definitions ought to be redundant. But because it is actually about Israel it is still pursued.

    On the internet I have been subject to accusations of anti-semitism. That's because I am disinclined to toe the Israeli line on the history of Palestine and Israel/Palestine. Interestingly I have no memory of being accused of anti-semitism when I have opined that everything important in the Old Testament is absurd fiction. So the key matter seems to be politics - modern Israel - not Judaism.

    As for 'Holocaust Denial', it's foolish or wicked to deny that Jews were murdered, presumably by the millions. No doubt lies have been told by members of the Holocaust Industry but that doesn't mean that the slaughter didn't happen. Making 'Holocaust Denial' a crime seems to me foolish or wicked too. As ever, the world is well provided with folly and evil.

    I am unimpressed with your whole antisemite trope. Jews or useful gentiles which you seem to be, see antisemitism everywhere. You could just as easily say that UK leftists hate the Chinese because of trade issues or that they are racist against Russians because of hysteria in the UK press.

    How bout you not treat Jews as if they are a special class of people to be coddled like retarded children. In any group, there will be people who do not like others. That does not make a movement antisemitic.

    As far as the holocaust, I have to admit that seeing contemporary Jews like so much in the media has me feeling skeptical about what happened in WW2. But I also have no motivation to believe what happened then until Jews acknowledge the modern day holocaust happening in Palestine which has caused at least as many deaths.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    Russia is assassinating people on UK soil with nerve gas. There is a fair degree of reason for the UK to be wary of them.
    , @Anon
    You are I suppose entitled to.the rather juvenile attitude that you won't be particularly interested in discovering the truth until Jewish supporters of Israel show themselves keen to tell the truth about the treatment of Palestinians. But you completely blow it with your total BS about Palestinian deaths at the hands of Israel being "at least as many" as in the WW2 killing of Jews. That is a very stupid thing to say.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. What Ron Unz says makes a lot of sense. I personally know a few Jewish people, In-laws and others and I find them to be some of the nicest people. But the “International Jew” is a whole other matter.
    I wonder what these Jewish people would really think about important matters as all I remember in my discussions with them has been about sports , weather, vacations and such. Broaching incorrect topics maybe would have been the end of friendships and perhaps incurred shunning. Can you imagine if I had brought up the topic of hereditary IQ. To be fair a lot of non Jewish people have the same ideas of “we are created equal”.
    Ron you are a very brave man. We need more people like you.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  69. @Sic Semper
    Pedophilia is a protected sacrament in the jewish community. There are thousands of victims in NY City with a sitting NY Governor and his NY Governor father having profited and protected a serial child rapist for decades. The media erases the cries of the victims and instead works to rehabilitate the public images of child rapists see Anderson Cooper of CNN/60 Minutes interview titled: An Unlikely Informant in 2015: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-informant-michael-blutrich-60-minutes/

    The most detailed examination of the relationship of two NY Governors, their political party and a serial child rapist was conducted in 1999 by an outraged ex-NYPD detective: https://www.scribd.com/document/327564828/USA-Confidential-December-1998

    This seminal investigation was cited by The American Spectator https://www.scribd.com/document/383369648/Banking-on-Cuomo
    as well as other newspapers during the ensuing conviction of said child rapist, not for serial raping children, but a $400 Million fraud where current NY Governor was personally appointed to the board of directors.

    No mention has been made of these stories in more than 20 years. The pleas of hundreds of victims are completely ignored by the media.

    That’s horrible, but probably not much different than the Catholic Church closing ranks to protect pedophile priests.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. @nagra
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIesXORjBps
    (if I may)

    (They) want more of (Them) to return to (their homeland) so the plot conceived by (Them) to import Muslims who hate (Them) is a secret (Z-conspiracy) plot.

    Sorry, its the Freemasons. They’re Jews too.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    I would rather call a spare pope as a witness in global
    never heard about bosnian nation or language as well
    \same happens on the land of so called palestine now\
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  71. @Verymuchalive

    But we should keep in mind that a Jewish plotter had been implicated in the killing of Czar Alexander II, and Jewish assassins had also struck down several top Russian ministers and numerous other government officials.
     
    In the article you published by Anatoly Karlin " The Russian Empire: Too Nice for Its Own Good " ( September 26 2017 ), Mr K writes, "What Communist propagandists don't like to mention as much is that just during the three years1904-1907 some 4,500 Tsarist officials were murdered by what would today be classified as Far Left terrorist groups."

    It would be interesting to discover what percentage of those convicted of the murders were of Jewish origin.

    So about this issue: One time Minister of the Interior Vyacheslav von Plehve estimated that 40% of Russia’s revolutionaries were Jews.

    From a 1903 speech:

    In Western Russia some 90% of the revolutionaries are Jews, and in Russia generally – some 40%. I shall not conceal from you that the revolutionary movement in Russia worries us but you should know that if you do not deter your youth from the revolutionary movement, we shall make your position untenable to such an extent that you will have to leave Russia, to the very last man!

    He was assassinated in 1904. In fairness, his killer seems to have been an ethnic Russian (Egor Sazonov).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
    They don't make Interior Ministers like that anymore, sadly. Could you imagine any contemporary European or North American Interior Minister saying such a thing to Muslims ?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. @dearieme
    'Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, describing it as an “existential threat” to the Jewish community for the anti-Semitism it was fostering.'

    You need to tread carefully here. Corbyn's far left mob seems indeed to include numerous anti-semites. I first noticed the strange business of leftie anti-semitism in the shower who took control of the Labour Party and the City Council in Dundee some decades ago. There is doubtless additionally what I might call 'calculated anti-semitism' i.e. an attempt to encourage moslems to the polls.

    And yet I agree with Labour's refusal to be foisted with somebody else's definition of anti-semitism, which definition looks to me to be a blatant attempt to censor political criticism of Israel. On a more rational, narrower definition, the Corbynistas still seem substantially anti-semitic to me, so the argument about definitions ought to be redundant. But because it is actually about Israel it is still pursued.

    On the internet I have been subject to accusations of anti-semitism. That's because I am disinclined to toe the Israeli line on the history of Palestine and Israel/Palestine. Interestingly I have no memory of being accused of anti-semitism when I have opined that everything important in the Old Testament is absurd fiction. So the key matter seems to be politics - modern Israel - not Judaism.

    As for 'Holocaust Denial', it's foolish or wicked to deny that Jews were murdered, presumably by the millions. No doubt lies have been told by members of the Holocaust Industry but that doesn't mean that the slaughter didn't happen. Making 'Holocaust Denial' a crime seems to me foolish or wicked too. As ever, the world is well provided with folly and evil.

    Leftists, as blank slate opponents of “privilege”, should be more anti-Semitic than right-wingers by default. Anything else is dishonest.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Most leftists:

    Each successful Jew has attained his position because of that particular individual's agency.

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.

    Do blacks, women, browns, etc. have agency?

    , @Silva
    It's possible to be Leftist and non-blank-slatist (or to be blank-slatist on race, but consider inherited culture decisive). I (non-Jew) always was, and notice growing numbers of Jews becoming of late: of course, it's from that position that one can try to argue Jews deserve all the power they have, and blacks more than they have (at you-know-who's expense, they being at fault) - but I think (e.g.) Ron's analysis is plenty for one to think "they have actually superior ability (be it cultural or genetic) *and* corrupt collusion".
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. res says:
    @mcohen
    Obviously you would not publish again the ritual murder of christian children by orthodox rabbis story unless you had solid proof and sources.

    So

    1.where did they take place.country and town
    2.what were the names of the rabbis
    3.were they ever convicted
    4.did any other people besides jews commit the same crimes.
    5.do you understand the biblical story of abraham sacrificing a ram instead of his son

    4.did any other people besides jews commit the same crimes.

    That says a great deal. Time to change the narrative from denial to tu quoque?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @Wally
    Unz said:
    "... the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them."

    The absolute best examples of that are the fake '6M Jews and gas chambers", forgetting for the moment the equally fraudulent '5M others' used by Jews to essentially buy votes for their agenda.

    It's quite bizarre that Jews actually want 6M Jews to be dead. Revisionists bring Jews good news. Jews should be elated to know that 6,000,000 of their brethren were not murdered.

    Truth can no longer be stopped. Regardless of "Holocau$t Industry" lies, their religion does not hold up to scientific, rational scrutiny.

    Be part of the solution:
    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews

    Replace the word ‘jews’ with ‘cells’ and you have aptly described cancer

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. joe webb says:

    Strange that Kevin MacDonald’s magisterial three volumes on Jewish history and especially his third volume, Culture of Critique, is not remarked in Ron’s otherwise very good article.

    Also, the Neoconservataives, who are starting world war 3 and attacking Russia, misleading American pols big-time on Russia and the middle east, while China looms larger and larger, is also a notably overlooked theme.

    Maybe there will be a Part Two from Ron.

    Joe Webb

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  76. @Anonymous
    I am unimpressed with your whole antisemite trope. Jews or useful gentiles which you seem to be, see antisemitism everywhere. You could just as easily say that UK leftists hate the Chinese because of trade issues or that they are racist against Russians because of hysteria in the UK press.

    How bout you not treat Jews as if they are a special class of people to be coddled like retarded children. In any group, there will be people who do not like others. That does not make a movement antisemitic.

    As far as the holocaust, I have to admit that seeing contemporary Jews like so much in the media has me feeling skeptical about what happened in WW2. But I also have no motivation to believe what happened then until Jews acknowledge the modern day holocaust happening in Palestine which has caused at least as many deaths.

    Russia is assassinating people on UK soil with nerve gas. There is a fair degree of reason for the UK to be wary of them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    No they are not. Russians aren't stupid and there are so many holes in this conspiracy theory it is laughable. The UK set up this assignation on their own to frame Russia duh.
    , @nagra
    Russia can do you all in one go if they are really after that
    no single Scripal died apropos your call of "assassination"
    , @NoseytheDuke
    Some "nerve gas" that seemingly is only fatal in just 25% of cases and takes several days to kill. Military grade you say?
    , @Anon
    The Skirpals were killed with a poison developed at the British defense department facility at Porton Downs, just a few miles from where they were poisoned.
    , @Ace
    The Skripals' misadventure (contretemps, dust up, theater, bit of bother) is absurd but did the U.K. government embrace it with alacrity and a vengeance or what? The only thing missing was narration by Edgar R. Murrow. Not to mention the Skripals.

    The very absurdity of it calls into question anything that preceded it with the same story line, viz., "Russians are animals."

    What anyone needs to be wary of is the people who push this and other "narratives": "Animal Assad," "religion of peace," "multiculturalism," "propositional nation," "comprehensive immigration law reform," "living Constitution," "equality," "hate speech," "Iranchiefsponsorofterror," "regime change," "treason," "collusion," "McCarthyism," "humanitarian intervention," "global/climate freeze/warming/change/disruption," "anti-Semitism," "Judeo-Christian," "target civilians/hospitals," and such like.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  77. res says:

    After reading this article I understand the extended recent outage at unz.com. You are a brave man, Ron. Mazel tov.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  78. A very good example of “Anti-semitism” is Lindbergh’s “notorious” speech in Des Moines in September 1941, which is inevitably trotted out whenever anyone (Pat Buchanan, Trump) starts talking of any independent (“isolationist”) foreign policy. Lindbergh, heretofore, an American icon, was forever after tarnished goods.

    It is interesting to read the text of his speech today, and compare it to the reaction it elicited (and still elicits).

    Here is a link to the speech:

    http://www.charleslindbergh.com/americanfirst/speech.asp

    and here is a summary of the manner in which it was received by the nation’s press (courtesy of the JTA, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency):

    https://www.jta.org/1941/09/15/archive/lindberghs-anti-jewish-speech-meets-with-severe-criticism-in-american-press

    Finally, here is a compilation of the “anti-Semitic” parts of the speech:

    The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration . . .

    The second major group I mentioned is the Jewish.

    It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race.

    No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its consequences.

    Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far-sighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not.

    Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.

    I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.

    We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.

    It is highly recommended to read the whole speech, as it offers an equally astute analysis of the other two principal actors of US intervention in the war.

    Read More
    • Replies: @LSJohn
    Thanks.

    Lindbergh really got a bad rap, and still does.

    After Pearl Harbor he tried to re-enlist in the Air Service but was spitefully denied for his earlier opposition to the war. He went to work for Henry Ford as a consultant to the production of B-24s.

    In early '44 he went to the Pacific and flew 50 combat missions as a civilian "Tech Rep."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Heros says:

    Thank you Ron Unz, not only for lifting this series of rocks and boulders covering up massive and even biblical jewish lies, frauds, and conspiracies, but also for providing me personally with a platform where I can vent my digust with this jewish collective to other like minded people without being banned or even excessively trolled. I thank you as a Christian for helping us to get off of our mind controlled knees to face these centuries old sects of ritual child murderers and genociders. I thank you for being a shining beacon of honesty and good character for jews to look up to (as if any will). The good lord knows that jews suffer from a massive dearth of people of character like you so I ask him to protect you.

    “If our mainstream media shapes our reality, scholarly books and articles based upon them tend to set the contours of that media coverage. And the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them.”

    We have to recognize that these same “energetic Jews” are pulling all kinds of strings, not just media. They are making every institution across the entire west dance to their tune of Anti-semitism, holohoax, pornography and cultural degradation, and mass population replacement.

    But most important is their control of the CIA and so called “deep state”. The CIA is deeply involved in media across the west, as is Mossad. We now know that Walter Cronkite, who got famous propagating the moon landing fraud, was a CIA asset. We know that today, Anderson Cooper, descendant of the bloodline Vanderbilt family, is a CIA asset.

    “Sometimes the intelligence agencies come to your office, they want you to write an article”

    Shortly after his book “Bought Journalists” was published in English, Udo suddenly died of an unexpected heart attack. Hmmmm. Maybe this is relevant:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6001335/How-Israels-secret-service-world-leader-assassins.html

    “Poison toothpaste, prisoners hypnotised to kill: How Mossad, Israel’s secret service, has become the world leader in assassins with 800 operations in the last decade

    Jews assasinate, or use a dagger to stab in the back, on an average of 80 goyim a year. I would bet that they took Udo out, along with Breitbard, Aaron Schwarz, and many, many others.

    I think we have to recognized that jews, historical assasins and ritual murderers for thousands of years, are still marching around the planet murdering goyim and jews who squeal. Like Seth Rich.

    So my questions to jews is: We know jews murder without compunction any inconvenient goyim to this day, so on what basis can you expect stupid goyim to believe that you have stopped torturing, extracting blood and organs from, and murdering Christian infants?

    Back to Unz saying to the jews that the lies and deceptions spewing out of the vast jewish media industrial complex has had “enormous consequences for our larger society” (milquetoast). Here is what the jewish master of propaganda and mind control, and inbred double nephew of Sigmund Freud, had to say:

    “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.”

    Through their control of the narrative and the media, the jews have been the “rue ruling power of our country” for over a hundred years. Every international action the US has taken since then has been made for the express purpose of helping Jews.

    Read More
    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Replies: @anonymous

    so I ask him to protect you.
     
    You mean you ask the following figure to protect Mr.Unz (and protection of Mr.U is surely a noble endeavour, I agree);

    http://factsanddetails.com/world/cat55/sub353/item1403.html

    Now, this figure should resemble one of your great great grandfathers. Do you think one of great great grandfathers has the power to protect anyone... Mr.Pagan? ;)
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Many thanks for this, Ron Unz. One of the hardest things in the world is trying to focus on what is true when you know that those on one side of the argument are ready to clobber you if you veer onto the other side.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  81. iffen says:
    @Anatoly Karlin
    Leftists, as blank slate opponents of "privilege", should be more anti-Semitic than right-wingers by default. Anything else is dishonest.

    Most leftists:

    Each successful Jew has attained his position because of that particular individual’s agency.

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.

    Do blacks, women, browns, etc. have agency?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    Haven't you left out "empowerment" (individual division)? I'm sure it belongs in their somewhere.
    , @Wally
    said:
    "Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual."

    PC nonsense which ignores the low IQs of blacks & browns and the fact that women rarely venture into higher paying STEM fields, nor work the hours of men, nor work the higher paying dangerous & laborious jobs.
    When there are cases of being evenly matched, equally qualified, women actually get higher pay.

    If the mythical 'same work for less pay' was a fact then men would never get jobs if profit oriented businesses could hire women for the same job for less money.

    The Marxist 'Gender Pay Gap' - Class Struggle Meets Gender Struggle
    Females Actually Earn More Than Their Equally Matched Male Counterparts
    https://sites.google.com/site/deanjackson60/the-marxist-gender-pay-gap---class-struggle-meets-gender-struggle-females-earn-more-than-their-equally-matched-male-counterparts

    , @anon

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.
     
    And who are these "whites" who unfairly deny their success, are they whites or are they (((whites)))? The institutions that are the most discriminatory towards women and minorities are Hollywood, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, management consulting, law firms, upper echelons of academia, media, businesses...all are dominated by (((whites))).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. nagra says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    (They) want more of (Them) to return to (their homeland) so the plot conceived by (Them) to import Muslims who hate (Them) is a secret (Z-conspiracy) plot.

    Sorry, its the Freemasons. They're Jews too.

    I would rather call a spare pope as a witness in global
    never heard about bosnian nation or language as well
    \same happens on the land of so called palestine now\

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    Since you cannot read or write in English, I am unable to understand the point of your post.
    , @Druid
    Your writing doesn't correspond to the verbal pro -Israli diatribe in your above post. You must be a zio shill
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    Russia is assassinating people on UK soil with nerve gas. There is a fair degree of reason for the UK to be wary of them.

    No they are not. Russians aren’t stupid and there are so many holes in this conspiracy theory it is laughable. The UK set up this assignation on their own to frame Russia duh.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. nagra says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    Russia is assassinating people on UK soil with nerve gas. There is a fair degree of reason for the UK to be wary of them.

    Russia can do you all in one go if they are really after that
    no single Scripal died apropos your call of “assassination”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. JackOH says:
    @Kingfelix
    The feedback loop described, whereby a new generation of zealots build upon the work of the previous generation is apposite. I would add to this the fact that, in my personal experience (interacting with Jewish professors at a university bookstore), Jews appear to discount the opinions/guidance/facts furnished of non-Jews to the point where one would often feel invisible and mute, as one's answers to queries were discounted, while the same response from another Jew would be heard clearly and acknowledged. This, and variations upon it, was a more or less regular occurrence.

    Kingfelix, yep. “Are you Jewish?”, a Jewish businessman asked me. I guess I presented as intellectually aggressive and verbal. Nope, I replied. He stayed friendly, but it’s a sure bet I missed something of an opportunity that would have been open had I offered the “right” answer.

    I may have mentioned here when I first noted my “are you Jewish?” story that I’ve grossly overestimated talent alone as a determinant of hiring, interviews, advancement, and what-not, and grossly underestimated familial and ethnic ties, the whole mess of other human bonds and attributes, plus affirmative action as “helper” or “clincher” determinants.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. @nagra
    I would rather call a spare pope as a witness in global
    never heard about bosnian nation or language as well
    \same happens on the land of so called palestine now\

    Since you cannot read or write in English, I am unable to understand the point of your post.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    oh really

    како би било да ти мало научиш српски па да онда мало паметујеш па тек онда да цијели свијет може мало боље разумјети па да дохвати такву примитивну патетичност
    није ти мало тих твојих гена које смо ти дали

    како би било да ти почнем причу од неке тамо Винче
    https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin%C4%8Danska_kultura
    what you are not able to read now is 7ooo year old language

    ме
    In Roots
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it.

    This contrasts vividly with the immediate accusations of ‘anti-semitism’ one provokes if one criticizes Israel. I’ve been labeled an ‘anti-semite’ myself for attacking Israel. The prominent professor Deborah Lipstadt has called Jeremy Corbyn’s views ‘soft-core anti-semitism’ — simply because he refuses to actually endorse Israeli criminality. Jimmy Carter has been called an ‘anti–semite’ for daring to point out some of Israel’s more outrageous practices. The brilliant and otherwise impeccably progressive Norm Finkelstein was not merely denied tenure for his views; there were actual efforts to get him evicted from his apartment. These figures are all supposedly ‘anti-semites’ — and as such, to be persecuted, hounded, and if possible, forced to recant.

    This strikes me as ridiculous: would one be labeled as an anti-German bigot if one objected to Nazism? Would a ferocious anti-Communism be considered proof that one hated Russians?

    The point, though, is that those who wield the club of labelling all and sundry ‘anti-semites’ don’t seem to care about anti-semitism at all, per se. As many here manage to unconsciously demonstrate, you can voice the most unmeasured anti-semitism without fear of condemnation.

    On the other hand, as I’ve enumerated, there are examples of people being criticised, persecuted, hounded from their jobs for attacking Israel. However, the unfortunate Professor Toaff is the only example I can think of of anyone being seriously attacked for expressing anti-semitic views as such. Generally, if you’re feeling froggy, jump. No one cares.

    What can — and will — provoke a response is criticism of Israel. The condemnation of anti-semitism isn’t about anti-semitism at all. Much more commonly, it’s a useful club to prevent criticism of Israel.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Heros

    "One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it."
     

    Get a grip on in Colin! Week after week, Ron Unz has been chronicling jewish perfidity and coverups of centuries of crimes against humanity. At least on unz.com, if you don't agree with Ron's analysis you had a loads of chances to debate it there. Instead, like all the other arrogant jews, you start your entire comment kvetching and flinging spittle with the same old "anti-semite" canard. Give us a break for crying out loud.

    There is no more discussion, except among you jewish racist supremacists who are accessories to the murder of children, of if anti-semitism is a chicken/egg dilemma. Anti-semitism is a reaction to jewish lies and crimes. Here at Unz, with this article, it has been laid to rest.

    When you immediately start your post with this standard centuries old jewish canard, we know that you are just being duplicitous.

    However, now that we do know that the roots of anti-semitism are a reaction to jewish crimes, jewish lies, and jewish ritual sacrifices, it is time to turn our attention back to 1933. That is the year that the "anti-semite" Hitler got elected. To quote Benjamin Freedman:


    "Before Hitler had touched the hair of a single jew, Judea declared war on Germany"
     
    .
    http://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/judea_declares_war_on_germany.jpg

    Jews deliberately started WWII using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    If we go further back to WWI, with the prolonging of the war until Balfour was signed and the Jews brought America into the war, it is clear that jews started this war too, using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    So if we look back over the last 100 years, or even all the way back to the French revolution, what we see is hundreds of pointless wars between Christian countries, that were started using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    When I look at the score card here, I see in the White European column tens upon tens upon tens of millions of dead fighting wars for lying jews. In the jew column I see 6 million, listed about 33 times starting about 1880. All of them fake. All of them projected back onto the goyim.

    What a race of swine.

    , @jsm
    The point, though, is that those who wield the club of labelling all and sundry ‘anti-semites’ don’t seem to care about anti-semitism at all, per se. As many here manage to unconsciously demonstrate, you can voice the most unmeasured anti-semitism without fear of condemnation.

    That's the singular most retarded thing I've read this year.

    We're all here under ASSUMED names, because we all know what will befall us professionally and personally if we get doxxed for what we've said here.

    Ask Mike Enoch (real name Mike Peinovich) about being doxxed for voicing *measured* anti-semitism, much the less "un"measured anti-semitism
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. this is in no way meant to be inflammatory, derogatory or conspiratorial; however, does the author have any opinion regarding the authenticity of the protocols.

    i have read them, and the scheme depicted therein is a cogent, thoughtful, and disciplined plan which appears to be coming to some form of fruition, and is in no way as nebulous, and ill-defined as the much more academically accepted oracles of nostradamus.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Read Unz last article where he goes over the Protocols.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. @Jeff Stryker
    Russia is assassinating people on UK soil with nerve gas. There is a fair degree of reason for the UK to be wary of them.

    Some “nerve gas” that seemingly is only fatal in just 25% of cases and takes several days to kill. Military grade you say?

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    no person was even killed in Scripal case
    @Jeff Stryker is just pathetic with tear in his eye
    , @anon
    Are you one of the experts on UR who says "military grade" and can explain what an expert means by it? Why wouldn't the military have designed for it
    (a) a gas which disables quickly as its main intended effect
    (b) doesn't kiĺl or permanently disable quickly to guard against accidents and allow antidotes to be administered and take effect?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. It could have been Russian mafia. But the again, Trotsky was killed with an ax.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  91. bjondo says:
    @Patricus
    Could you name one credible case where Jews ritually murdered Christian children, or muslim/pagan/any children? I can't find any.

    Every day, in Israel, Muslim and Christian children.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. nagra says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    Since you cannot read or write in English, I am unable to understand the point of your post.

    oh really

    како би било да ти мало научиш српски па да онда мало паметујеш па тек онда да цијели свијет може мало боље разумјети па да дохвати такву примитивну патетичност
    није ти мало тих твојих гена које смо ти дали

    како би било да ти почнем причу од неке тамо Винче

    https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin%C4%8Danska_kultura

    what you are not able to read now is 7ooo year old language

    ме
    In Roots

    Read More
    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    HEY TITO

    I knew you were a dumb Slav to think a German American could read that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. nagra says:
    @NoseytheDuke
    Some "nerve gas" that seemingly is only fatal in just 25% of cases and takes several days to kill. Military grade you say?

    no person was even killed in Scripal case
    is just pathetic with tear in his eye

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. David says:
    @Lot
    "cries of “anti-Semite” soon appeared, and according to Google there are now over 180,000 such hits combining her name and that harsh accusatory term. "

    There are also 186,000 Google results combining her name with the word "ducks."

    What does that prove?

    Good rhetoric but upon searching the two strings, in the case of anti-semite, the word or a closely related one actually appears in the hits, whereas with ducks, no hit (out of the first 8 or 10) actually contains the word duck, unless in a link to another, unrelated article.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. RudyM says:

    6,000,000 comments by the end of the week.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    let's not forget 25 mill russians
    and the 1.7 mill serbs
    as well
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. nagra says:
    @RudyM
    6,000,000 comments by the end of the week.

    let’s not forget 25 mill russians
    and the 1.7 mill serbs
    as well

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  97. utu says:
    @TomSchmidt
    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    That's a great insight.

    That’s not an insight. And insight requires something to exist. This is a construction by our wannabe Freud, you idiot, who, btw, also is an idiot.

    Read More
    • Replies: @TomSchmidt
    It was Jung who was the big theoretician of the Shadow.

    I recall an argument with a colleague about the Bishop Ussher, who calculated the precise date of creation October, 4004BC. He said well, the answer's wrong, so the work is useless. I pointed out that, given the assumptions that the Bible is real, that it was a major work of scholarship. What we judged was the ability to logically apply scholarship within a paradigm. This did not require us to accept the premises of Biblical literal correctness.

    Within a Jungian paradigm, that's an insight, defined as
    "the capacity to gain an accurate and deep intuitive understanding of a person or thing". To quote from Wikipedia on Shadow:

    Contrary to a Freudian definition of shadow, the Jungian shadow can include everything outside the light of consciousness and may be positive or negative. "Everyone carries a shadow," Jung wrote, "and the less it is embodied in the individual's conscious life, the blacker and denser it is."[2] It may be (in part) one's link to more primitive animal instincts,[3] which are superseded during early childhood by the conscious mind.

    Carl Jung stated the shadow to be the unknown dark side of the personality.[4][5] According to Jung, the shadow, in being instinctive and irrational, is prone to psychological projection, in which a perceived personal inferiority is recognized as a perceived moral deficiency in someone else. Jung writes that if these projections remain hidden, "The projection-making factor (the Shadow archetype) then has a free hand and can realize its object—if it has one—or bring about some other situation characteristic of its power."[6] These projections insulate and harm individuals by acting as a constantly thickening veil of illusion between the ego and the real world.
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. This is in the category of “Jeez, I wish I’d have said that!” Terrific article, Ron Unz.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  99. @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    If you really want your mind blown, read Voluptuous Panic by Mel Gordon. It covers the Weimar Republic and how debauched they were. Everything from mother daughter prostitute teams, to a lot of gay sex, to pedo stuff too.

    It was so over the top I couldn't believe it. But at the same time we are starting to see the parallels here in America. Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry. I would like you to cover this sexual angle in a future article.

    Rather Funny but I was reading about the Trump vrs NYTimes controversy. I began to wonder about not just jews individually but jewish conrol (USA) institutions in major pro Zionist historical events….what has been the role of the NYTimes during the USA Civil War, the creation of the Fed, WW I, WW II, the Vietnam, Watergate, JFK,RKennedy, 911, dimise, etc. has any scholar investigated the UNknown history of the NYTimes …???? IBM heped the NAZIs…NYTImes role in Hstorical events collaboration with Nazism, pro Israel terrorists…what??

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. @nagra
    oh really

    како би било да ти мало научиш српски па да онда мало паметујеш па тек онда да цијели свијет може мало боље разумјети па да дохвати такву примитивну патетичност
    није ти мало тих твојих гена које смо ти дали

    како би било да ти почнем причу од неке тамо Винче
    https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin%C4%8Danska_kultura
    what you are not able to read now is 7ooo year old language

    ме
    In Roots

    HEY TITO

    I knew you were a dumb Slav to think a German American could read that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  101. Heros says:
    @Colin Wright
    One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it.

    This contrasts vividly with the immediate accusations of 'anti-semitism' one provokes if one criticizes Israel. I've been labeled an 'anti-semite' myself for attacking Israel. The prominent professor Deborah Lipstadt has called Jeremy Corbyn's views 'soft-core anti-semitism' -- simply because he refuses to actually endorse Israeli criminality. Jimmy Carter has been called an 'anti--semite' for daring to point out some of Israel's more outrageous practices. The brilliant and otherwise impeccably progressive Norm Finkelstein was not merely denied tenure for his views; there were actual efforts to get him evicted from his apartment. These figures are all supposedly 'anti-semites' -- and as such, to be persecuted, hounded, and if possible, forced to recant.

    This strikes me as ridiculous: would one be labeled as an anti-German bigot if one objected to Nazism? Would a ferocious anti-Communism be considered proof that one hated Russians?

    The point, though, is that those who wield the club of labelling all and sundry 'anti-semites' don't seem to care about anti-semitism at all, per se. As many here manage to unconsciously demonstrate, you can voice the most unmeasured anti-semitism without fear of condemnation.

    On the other hand, as I've enumerated, there are examples of people being criticised, persecuted, hounded from their jobs for attacking Israel. However, the unfortunate Professor Toaff is the only example I can think of of anyone being seriously attacked for expressing anti-semitic views as such. Generally, if you're feeling froggy, jump. No one cares.

    What can -- and will -- provoke a response is criticism of Israel. The condemnation of anti-semitism isn't about anti-semitism at all. Much more commonly, it's a useful club to prevent criticism of Israel.

    “One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it.”

    Get a grip on in Colin! Week after week, Ron Unz has been chronicling jewish perfidity and coverups of centuries of crimes against humanity. At least on unz.com, if you don’t agree with Ron’s analysis you had a loads of chances to debate it there. Instead, like all the other arrogant jews, you start your entire comment kvetching and flinging spittle with the same old “anti-semite” canard. Give us a break for crying out loud.

    There is no more discussion, except among you jewish racist supremacists who are accessories to the murder of children, of if anti-semitism is a chicken/egg dilemma. Anti-semitism is a reaction to jewish lies and crimes. Here at Unz, with this article, it has been laid to rest.

    When you immediately start your post with this standard centuries old jewish canard, we know that you are just being duplicitous.

    However, now that we do know that the roots of anti-semitism are a reaction to jewish crimes, jewish lies, and jewish ritual sacrifices, it is time to turn our attention back to 1933. That is the year that the “anti-semite” Hitler got elected. To quote Benjamin Freedman:

    “Before Hitler had touched the hair of a single jew, Judea declared war on Germany”

    .
    Jews deliberately started WWII using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call “anti-semitism”.

    If we go further back to WWI, with the prolonging of the war until Balfour was signed and the Jews brought America into the war, it is clear that jews started this war too, using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call “anti-semitism”.

    So if we look back over the last 100 years, or even all the way back to the French revolution, what we see is hundreds of pointless wars between Christian countries, that were started using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call “anti-semitism”.

    When I look at the score card here, I see in the White European column tens upon tens upon tens of millions of dead fighting wars for lying jews. In the jew column I see 6 million, listed about 33 times starting about 1880. All of them fake. All of them projected back onto the goyim.

    What a race of swine.

    Read More
    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Well, I suppose jews had read Mein Kampf, where jews are called schmarotzer, parasites.
    Now for me the basic moral question of WII is simple: was Hitler right in drastically reducing jewish influence in Germany, or were jews right in trying to remove Hitler ?

    Such conflicts are not seldom in history.
    Michel Rostovtzeff, 'Geschichte der Alten Welt, erster Band, Der Orient und Griechenland', Bremen 1961 (The History of the Ancient World), page 445: Antiochos IV tried by force to impose Greek culture in Judea. Jews responded with a vehement national reaction, that led them into almost complete segregation in religion and customs.

    I'd like to add that I wonder how much longer common USA citizens accept the present jewish influence in the USA.
    If people as Wolfowitz, Soros and Netanyahu had any common sense, they would ask themselves if for jewry the moment for a complete change of jewish behaviour is not necessary now.
    I here quoted Katz 'can it happen again ?'.
    I suppose it can, though I see gas chambers for humans as a fairy tale.
    After Pearl Harbour the USA was quite capable of interning anyone Japanese or of japanese descent in concentration camps.

    Stephen Steinlight wrote that in case of disaster there would always be Israel to go to.
    He did not realise that, in my opinion, Israel is wholly dependent on USA support.
    The Samsom option will not save jewish lives, on the contrary.
    , @Colin Wright
    Lol. Poor Colin...

    To put it mildly, you're missing the target.


    '...Get a grip on in Colin! Week after week, Ron Unz has been chronicling jewish perfidity and coverups of centuries of crimes against humanity. At least on
    und.com, if you don’t agree with Ron’s analysis you had a loads of chances to debate it there. Instead, like all the other arrogant jews, you start your entire comment kvetching and flinging spittle with the same old “anti-semite” canard. Give us a break for crying out loud.

    There is no more discussion, except among you jewish racist supremacist...


    You can't win. I've been banned for 'antisemitism.' Youall are going to have to make up your mind: am I an 'anti-semite' or a 'Jewish racial supremacist'? It seems improbable I could be both.

    Anyway, thanks. You've given me some amusing lines to quote. Colin Wright: Jewish racist supremacist.


    You can't win.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  102. AaronB says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.
     
    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion---mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever "the holocaust" may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice "victim"---Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you---is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    You are one of the most original thinkers here – I don’t necessarily agree with everything you say, but you say interesting and original things that are out of the box.

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.

    So you won’t get much appreciation here – but write for the invisible audience, its worthwhile.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.
     
    Don't say......

    So you won’t get much appreciation here – but write for the invisible audience, its worthwhile.
     
    Yup.
    , @Buster Keaton’s Stunt Double

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.
     
    That most commenters here (resident trolls such as Rosie, Colin Wright, EliteCommInc. and so forth notwithstanding) tend to espouse broadly similar beliefs is irrelevant to the question of whether those beliefs are “edgy and nonconformist,” because they most certainly would be viewed as the latter by those right-thinking goodwhites still is enmeshed in the matrix (assuming that they didn’t immediately collapse into hysterics upon being confronted with said beliefs).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  103. nagra says:
    @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    If you really want your mind blown, read Voluptuous Panic by Mel Gordon. It covers the Weimar Republic and how debauched they were. Everything from mother daughter prostitute teams, to a lot of gay sex, to pedo stuff too.

    It was so over the top I couldn't believe it. But at the same time we are starting to see the parallels here in America. Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry. I would like you to cover this sexual angle in a future article.

    If you really want your mind blown, read Marquis de Sade
    ( just saying : )

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  104. @Intelligent Dasein

    So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.
     
    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion---mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever "the holocaust" may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice "victim"---Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you---is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point

    Now if only we could manage to awaken the gentile masses to the reality that the Jews weaving these fanciful fables of victimization and hardship to manipulate and ultimately harm us are in fact the terrifying and challenging enemy that we have been wanting for.

    Then we could genuinely put that desire for heroism to good work.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  105. Wally says:
    @mcohen
    gimme a wally

    Hohohohohoho at codoh

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2wXH8m34-js

    Yep, another True Believer, mcohen, bites the dust. That’s his best shot.
    recommended:
    The Counter Terminology to Holocaust Denial Should Be Holocaust Belief, by Carolyn Yeager: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11899
    exc.:
    “Just as with any religion, obedience to it’s dogma makes one a Believer, a faithful True Believer.
    Since there are no verifiable, actual, provable facts or physical evidence to hold onto, the Believer clings to faith & faith alone.

    Just look at the intentionally misleading make-believe theatrical lighting & staging, embarrassing actually”:
    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  106. How DARE you notice (fill in the Israeli/Jewish outrage here or over there), you anti-Semite! That’s pretty much the deal. That ain’t no poor little country on the heels of three wars that I knew 45 years ago. Read up on AIPAC and ADL, to say nothing of another 5 or 6 hundred other distributors of billions in cash to our politicians. Then compare the “Russians’ effect.Israeli’s own the joint. Pardon us amti-Semites for noticing. It gets that way when Jews call through their proxies for the elimination of us anti-Semitic Whites, the Jews themselves being Whiter than the the Whi.
    tes they hate.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  107. sarz says:

    And no, I don’t think you’d find an account of Toaff’s book, much less a summary of the cases he mentions, on the internet or elsewhere.

    I think Israel Shamir’s review of Toaff might be what you say you are unable to find.

    http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Eng11.htm

    Read More
    • Agree: Cleburne
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  108. Heros says:
    @Anonymous
    http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/jewish_sacrifice.htm

    This page cites 40 or more historical jewish ritual murders (usually of Christians) including those of children. Many sources are cited all the way to antiquity. Search the page for "Herodotus". The list begins there.

    Wow Wow Wow! Incredible.

    Aside from all the documented ritual blood sacrifices throughout history, what is a revelation is that it proves that this is still going on today on a massive scale:

    “Abortion has become an overt means of child sacrifice which Jews have instituted under their defacto law. A more covert means of {Christian} child sacrifice has been by their infamous ‘ritual murders, which Jews have been accused through the ages.’ In this practice ‘the blood of the sacrificed gentile {Christian Child} is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.’”

    We know that Kevin Okeefe exposed Planned Parenthood for selling parts of aborted fetuses. I wonder if the jew PP organization might have got the idea to extract 100% of the blood from these fetuses and sell it on for us in Purim rituals? Naa, jews have morals. Thats what all the jews on unz keep telling us anyway.

    Then they also say this:

    “Typical was the case of Jan Masaryk, the President of Czechoslovakia.

    Masaryk was an obscure lawyer when the body of Agnez Hruza was found in Bohemia in 1899.
    A Jew named Hilsner confessed to the murder and implicated two other Jews.
    Nevertheless, a new trial was ordered. Dr. Baxa, attorney for the murdered girl’s mother, who was seeking justice in this case, made a speech in the Bohemian Diet, or Parliament, December 28, 1899, accusing the Government of having shown extreme partiality to the Jews in this case. A second body was found, that of Maria Klima, who had also been murdered with a ritual knife which was found in Hilsner’s possession.

    Hilsner’s defending counsel at this trial was Jan Masaryk. At the Versailles Peace Conference, twenty years later, the Jews showed their gratitude by making a new nation, Czechoslovakia, and appointing Masaryk President, with the title, founder of Czechoslovakia. Throughout his life, Masaryk was an eager and willing tool of Jewish leaders.

    Suddenly we understand why the jews in Czechoslovakia were tormenting, murdering and likely even bloodletting the Sudeten Germans. This is how the jews started WWII, by killing and murdering Christians and then projecting their crime back on some other innocent but stupid goyim. But also it was all based on the cover up of a jewish ritual blood sacrifice. Amazing, the coverup is always worse.

    There is sooo much more in the document:

    “Because the city of Chicago is a center of Jewish financial power, and is completely controlled by the Jews, some of the most flagrant cases of ritual murder of Christian children have occurred there in recent years. Chicago is said to have become one of the world centers of the supply of children’s blood used in Jewish rites. The Chief of Police admitted that three hundred children disappear each month in Chicago, but he claims that they are all “runaways.” it is odd that these runaways never turn up, either in Chicago or anywhere else. In October, 1955, the rash of ritual murder cases was at a height when the bodies of two Schuessler boys, a Peterson boy, and the two Grimes girls were discovered.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  109. Abbybwood says:
    @Grahamsno(G64)
    With bated breath we eagerly await the 50 megaton 'Tsar Bomba' American Pravda the Holocaust.

    Although a tendency to lie and exaggerate was hardly unique to the political partisans of Russian(International) Jewry, the existence of a powerful international network of Jewish journalists and Jewish-influenced media outlets ensured that such concocted propaganda stories might receive enormous worldwide distribution, while the truth followed far behind, if at all.
     
    Just change a word in your quote Russian to international and we're talking about the Holocaust.

    the remarkable Jewish propensity to commit perjury in the courtroom led to severe problems in the effective administration of justice.
     
    That would be Nuremburg.

    Morgenthau knew of the millions of deaths and the lampshades made from victims’ skin, and he asked Wise not to go into excessive details. But Wise went on to tell of the barbarity of the Nazis, how they were making soap out of Jewish flesh
     
    But we're led to believe that millions of Jews were gassed to death in primitive brickhouses with wooden doors another fairy tale like lampshades and soap.

    Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!

    I was listening to an update by Alan Zabrosky last night where he laments that it is game over for the United States related to Jewish control over The White House, Congress and more and more state legislatures.

    Already about 20 or more states have made it illegal to support the BDS movement. Soon any negative discussions or questioning of “the official story”regarding The Holocaust will be illegal, so get at it Ron while you still can!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    said:
    "Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!"

    Indeed, I too would like Ron Unz to open up a bit more about that impossible, easily exposed fraud. However, by simply allowing the subject to be discussed at his site is pretty damn admirable.

    It's already well covered here:

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos: http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/img/HHS-300x127.jpg

    Visit & search here: www.codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau
    https://youtu.be/SUc6Y_E5zb0

    , @James Forrestal

    Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!
     
    Naw, he's pushing it enough with this stuff. Most people are not ready to accept that, and it draws too much pushback. Gotta start somewhere.
    , @Wade
    Can you provide a link to the Alan Zabrosky update you were listening to?

    The Jews will impoverish us all especially the middle class. They've already been doing a number on us for decades now. They hate us.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  110. @utu
    That's not an insight. And insight requires something to exist. This is a construction by our wannabe Freud, you idiot, who, btw, also is an idiot.

    It was Jung who was the big theoretician of the Shadow.

    I recall an argument with a colleague about the Bishop Ussher, who calculated the precise date of creation October, 4004BC. He said well, the answer’s wrong, so the work is useless. I pointed out that, given the assumptions that the Bible is real, that it was a major work of scholarship. What we judged was the ability to logically apply scholarship within a paradigm. This did not require us to accept the premises of Biblical literal correctness.

    Within a Jungian paradigm, that’s an insight, defined as
    “the capacity to gain an accurate and deep intuitive understanding of a person or thing”. To quote from Wikipedia on Shadow:

    Contrary to a Freudian definition of shadow, the Jungian shadow can include everything outside the light of consciousness and may be positive or negative. “Everyone carries a shadow,” Jung wrote, “and the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is.”[2] It may be (in part) one’s link to more primitive animal instincts,[3] which are superseded during early childhood by the conscious mind.

    Carl Jung stated the shadow to be the unknown dark side of the personality.[4][5] According to Jung, the shadow, in being instinctive and irrational, is prone to psychological projection, in which a perceived personal inferiority is recognized as a perceived moral deficiency in someone else. Jung writes that if these projections remain hidden, “The projection-making factor (the Shadow archetype) then has a free hand and can realize its object—if it has one—or bring about some other situation characteristic of its power.”[6] These projections insulate and harm individuals by acting as a constantly thickening veil of illusion between the ego and the real world.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  111. Wally says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.
     
    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion---mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever "the holocaust" may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice "victim"---Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you---is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    Good points.

    The demonization of the great Richard Wagner is a great example.

    Euro-gentiles cannot be allowed to have their heroes, tales of courage & strength unless Jews create them, control the message within them.

    Jews:
    the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral

    The debunked game is now out in the open, change is occurring.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mulegino1

    Euro-gentiles cannot be allowed to have their heroes, tales of courage & strength unless Jews create them, control the message within them.
     
    And ergo, the sick and perverted tales of Hollywood, the lousy music oozing from the entertainment world and the dumb goy obsession with professional sports, particularly the NFL and NBA.

    Jewry, as a hive or collective hates peace, thrives upon chaos, moral corruption and economic misery. It directs its hatred toward the best of the goyim, whom its so called "Holy" Talmud directs the Jews to kill. It can only prosper when it plays parasite to a nation or culture in declining health, as vigorous and virile cultures are immunized to it- the naming of the international Jewry and being wise to its machinations is a sine qua non of the freedom, independence, sovereignty and prosperity of any people.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  112. renfro says:
    @jilles dykstra
    " So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger. "

    Who made this statement when ?
    Quite ordinary ways.
    Depends on what one sees as ordinary.

    Spinoza was thrown out of the Dutch sephardic community because he brought a business conflict to a Dutch judge, in stead of letting the rabbi decide.
    Both Solsjenytsyn and Hödl describe how jewish communities fought for their autonomy, resisted assimilation.
    Both German and Russian jews dodged military service, though in WWI many jews did fight in the German army.

    Present day Muslims not all of them, behave in a similar way in NW Europe.
    There simply seems to be a loyalty conflict.
    In an undercover tv report on Muslims in Denmark, from mosques, one could hear the sentence 'w're not Danes, w're Muslims'.
    Sharia law was practiced in the mosques, as it is in present GB.

    About the other side of the ledger, Baruch describes his years supporting FDR as 'Public Years'.
    He does not excuse himself in this autobiography.
    I'm quite sure that Soros is equally convinced of doing the right thing.
    So, I fear, for most jews there is no other side of the ledger.
    Bernard M. Baruch, ‘Die Jahre des Dienens’, München 1962 (The public years, New York, 1960)
    The german title is even more explicit 'the years of service'.

    Who made this statement when ?

    Ron made it in this article.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Herald
    Whoops!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  113. phil says:
    @Roy Bauer
    Hello Mr. Unz.

    I'll just post this here:

    holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com

    I hope that your moderators will leave it up in the spirit of free discussion. I would love for someone to go through this document and debunk it if it is false.

    Good day.

    The article at holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com says:

    ‘It is highly significant that among this enormous collection of secret German records, not a single one provides any evidence of mass killing, or even refers to a German wartime policy or program of “extermination.” To the contrary, many of these documents — such as those cited in this article — further demonstrate the seriousness of the efforts by high-level government and SS authorities to maintain the health of inmates by combating disease in the camps.’

    However, David Irving has been touting correspondence between Heinrich Himmler (head of the SS) and a German statistician that indicates that the number of Jews executed in the Reinhardt Camps of Eastern Poland was in the millions, not even counting the many thousands of Jews who were allegedly shot by mobile units that operated in Eastern Europe after the launch of Operation Barbarossa in 1941. He also refers to documents in which Himmler indicates a desire to conceal information about mass deaths from Hitler.

    Will the debate end up being between Irving, who lost a famous court case as a “denier,” vs real denialists?

    See Irving’s Youtube “The Life and Death of Heinrich Himmler.” See also the document “Himmler Decodes” (British intercepts of Himmler’s correspondence) at Irving’s website.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    I assume Irving is referring to the Korherr Report, which is laughable, it says nothing about killing Jews.

    The Korherr Report is explained by Richard Korherr himself:


    The well-known, racially persecuted writer H.G. Adler, previously resident in Prague, now in London, wrote in the foreword to the second edition to his extraordinary book Theresienstadt 1941-1945 in 1960:

    "It has definitely been determined that the designation of Dr. Korherr as SS-statistician...is not true, because he never belonged to the SS and has been rehabilitated insofar as his behaviour in the National Socialist years is concerned."

    Unfortunately, Der Spiegel is publishing the claim of the English historian Irving that in the spring of 1942, at Himmler's order, I calculated the number of Jewish victims. In fact, these figures along with the text were delivered to me in completed form by the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA) with the order that not one word or figure was to be changed.

    The statement that I had claimed in this regard that more than a million Jews had died as a result of special treatment in the camps in German-occupied Poland and in the Warthegau is also incorrect. I have to protest against the word "died" in this context.

    It was precisely the term "special treatment" (sonderbehandlung) that motivated me to inquire of the RSHA by telephone what this term meant. I received the answer that it referred to Jews who would be settled in the District of Lublin.

    - Dr. Richard Korherr

    Braunschweig Nr. 28, July 1977, p. 72-74, Der SPIEGEL, an article commenting on the controversy surrounding David Irving's book "Hitler's War" under the title : HITLER -- Kecke Revision.
    Korherr's letter appears among a series of reactions ("Hitler gegen Irving") by people like Robert M. W. Kempner or the historians John Toland and Hans-Heinrich Wilhelm An English translation of the letter was presented during Udo Walendy's testimony at the Zündel trial 1988.

     

    Another recommended take down on the Irving claims about the Korherr Report:
    The Razor and the Ring, by John Weir
    https://codoh.com/library/document/3008/?lang=en
    , @Wally
    As for the claimed mass shootings of Jews, the fraudulent "Holocaust Industry" now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.

    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the 'holocaust' propganda is the message.

    www.codoh.com
    , @Mulegino1
    Five of the so called "Reinhardt" camps were simply transit camps, used for the relocation of Jews and others in German custody for purposes of resettlement and labor conscription. Majdanek/Lublin was a major SS administrative center located right at the edge and in full view of the City of Lublin.

    The most notorious of the Reinhardt camps was Treblinka II, a sub-camp for the Treblinka I labor camp. It is alleged that over 700,000 Jews were murdered using non-lethal diesel exhaust there, buried in gigantic mass graves. Never mind that mass graves containing 700,000 bodies would have to cover nearly 100 times the surface area of the mass graves at Katyn. Subsequently, the bodies were exhumed and cremated on outdoor cremation pyres which were set up on top of rail ties.

    There is absolutely no evidence that anything like this ever happened at Treblinka II. There are no signs of any mass graves or major excavations having occurred there. Aerial reconnaissance photos taken of the camp area shortly after the camp was closed show absolutely nothing. In other words, nothing happened at Treblinka II other than perhaps passengers de-training, being deloused and given a meal and continuing on their journey elsewhere.

    The Holohoax account of Treblinka II is an utter and absolute impossibility from a physical and logistical standpoint. The sick blood libel of European Christians carried out by international Jewry is collapsing under the weight of logic and empirical investigation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  114. @Heros

    "One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it."
     

    Get a grip on in Colin! Week after week, Ron Unz has been chronicling jewish perfidity and coverups of centuries of crimes against humanity. At least on unz.com, if you don't agree with Ron's analysis you had a loads of chances to debate it there. Instead, like all the other arrogant jews, you start your entire comment kvetching and flinging spittle with the same old "anti-semite" canard. Give us a break for crying out loud.

    There is no more discussion, except among you jewish racist supremacists who are accessories to the murder of children, of if anti-semitism is a chicken/egg dilemma. Anti-semitism is a reaction to jewish lies and crimes. Here at Unz, with this article, it has been laid to rest.

    When you immediately start your post with this standard centuries old jewish canard, we know that you are just being duplicitous.

    However, now that we do know that the roots of anti-semitism are a reaction to jewish crimes, jewish lies, and jewish ritual sacrifices, it is time to turn our attention back to 1933. That is the year that the "anti-semite" Hitler got elected. To quote Benjamin Freedman:


    "Before Hitler had touched the hair of a single jew, Judea declared war on Germany"
     
    .
    http://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/judea_declares_war_on_germany.jpg

    Jews deliberately started WWII using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    If we go further back to WWI, with the prolonging of the war until Balfour was signed and the Jews brought America into the war, it is clear that jews started this war too, using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    So if we look back over the last 100 years, or even all the way back to the French revolution, what we see is hundreds of pointless wars between Christian countries, that were started using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    When I look at the score card here, I see in the White European column tens upon tens upon tens of millions of dead fighting wars for lying jews. In the jew column I see 6 million, listed about 33 times starting about 1880. All of them fake. All of them projected back onto the goyim.

    What a race of swine.

    Well, I suppose jews had read Mein Kampf, where jews are called schmarotzer, parasites.
    Now for me the basic moral question of WII is simple: was Hitler right in drastically reducing jewish influence in Germany, or were jews right in trying to remove Hitler ?

    Such conflicts are not seldom in history.
    Michel Rostovtzeff, ‘Geschichte der Alten Welt, erster Band, Der Orient und Griechenland’, Bremen 1961 (The History of the Ancient World), page 445: Antiochos IV tried by force to impose Greek culture in Judea. Jews responded with a vehement national reaction, that led them into almost complete segregation in religion and customs.

    I’d like to add that I wonder how much longer common USA citizens accept the present jewish influence in the USA.
    If people as Wolfowitz, Soros and Netanyahu had any common sense, they would ask themselves if for jewry the moment for a complete change of jewish behaviour is not necessary now.
    I here quoted Katz ‘can it happen again ?’.
    I suppose it can, though I see gas chambers for humans as a fairy tale.
    After Pearl Harbour the USA was quite capable of interning anyone Japanese or of japanese descent in concentration camps.

    Stephen Steinlight wrote that in case of disaster there would always be Israel to go to.
    He did not realise that, in my opinion, Israel is wholly dependent on USA support.
    The Samsom option will not save jewish lives, on the contrary.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Heros

    "jews are called schmarotzer, parasites."
     
    I'll have to remember that one. If anyone ever calls me a schmarotzer I'll declare war on him and hire a bunch of sadistc jewish communists to ritually murder his family. That'll teach him not to call me a parasite.

    As I linked above, Mossad has assassinated 800 people in the last 10 years, it still hasn't stopped, the jewish war of blood lust against goyim. This has been going on for centuries, anti-semitism is really nothing more than jewish projection and gaslighting of the goyim. Please read this article for more information. Nothing Hitler did was wrong, just ask Bibi:

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578


    "“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked public uproar when on Tuesday he claimed that the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, was the one who planted the idea of the extermination of European Jewry in Adolf Hitler’s mind. The Nazi ruler, Netanyahu said, had no intention of killing the Jews, but only to expel them."
     
    Of coures, Bibi is also gaslighting the goyim here, we know that he will make up other lies about Hitler as soon as it is convenient or necessary. The point is that the jews used their Polish and Czech puppets to attack Germany after the jews had publicly declared war in 1933. Now we know that the President of Czechoslovakia was tied to the jews through the blood sacrifice of Christian children, and Pole Buffoon was also dancing on their string, as were the 3 stooges Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin.

    Judea started the second world war, there is no longer any question.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  115. Wally says:
    @Abbybwood
    Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!

    I was listening to an update by Alan Zabrosky last night where he laments that it is game over for the United States related to Jewish control over The White House, Congress and more and more state legislatures.

    Already about 20 or more states have made it illegal to support the BDS movement. Soon any negative discussions or questioning of “the official story”regarding The Holocaust will be illegal, so get at it Ron while you still can!

    said:
    “Yes, Mr. Unz SHOULD write about the holocaust, while he still legally can!”

    Indeed, I too would like Ron Unz to open up a bit more about that impossible, easily exposed fraud. However, by simply allowing the subject to be discussed at his site is pretty damn admirable.

    It’s already well covered here:

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos: http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1
    Visit & search here: http://www.codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Chemistry of Auschwitz / Birkenau

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  116. nagra says:

    (just in case someone doesn’t understand my posts)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  117. Heros says:
    @Sic Semper
    Another example of being held ideologically hostage occurred in 1994 in a class lectured by Iranian Hostage crisis survivor Barry Rosen, the image of him being blindfolded and held hostage was the graphic accompanying every newscast for the year and a half the crisis continued.

    Rosen taught an Iran module and was very fair in his depiction of the country and even-handed regarding his treatment as a hostage. Near the end of the semester he brought an Iranian diplomat in to speak to the class - It was truly fascinating.

    I vividly remember one jew in the class wearing his yarmaluke and kippah who obnoxiously slept the entire class and made grunting noises and loudly sighed the entire time. He quickly awoke during the opportunity to ask questions - of which he raised his hand and DEMANDED to know why Iran was HOSTILE to israel. Now, this person gave zero respect to the speaker and the lecture was not on Iranian foreign policy, all of it pertained to the nation's history avoiding anything remotely divisive or combative - israel was not mentioned once by the guest speaker - the speaker politely explained that israel was also hostile to Iran and shied away from any further discussion of geopolitics. With that the disrespectful student who had accomplished his grandstanding got up and stormed violently out of the classroom.

    I remember the feelings of disgust I had at witnessing the matter. The diplomat was not politically posturing, put no one on notice and was not hostile even to the person who attacked him. It was a disgusting attempt at holding hostage a classroom lecture on history with the witnesses to it.

    Just once I would love to see a similar act on a "holocaust survivor" -

    Hijacking discussions at every opportunity is another hallmark.

    “Hijacking discussions”

    The problem is that if you scale up “discussions” you come to “narratives”, and yes they have been hijacked. This jewish hijacking of the narrative, like many of the things they have imposed on us, has been done patiently and salami style: slice by slice.

    Jews always like to run to the boss, or the person of most authority. Where you or I would go through channels, escalating things properly so that the system can work smoothly, the jew looks for some vulnerable higher level goyim or another heeb in authority, and immediately jumps the queue.

    Do you think that judea is being ruled by a Frankist/Sabattean cult?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  118. Dan says:
    @Caruthers
    “Many years ago, on some website somewhere I came across a very insightful comment regarding the obvious connection between “anti-Semitism” and “racism,” which our mainstream media organs identify as two of the world’s greatest evils. Under this analysis, “anti-Semitism” represents the tendency to criticize or resist Jewish social cohesion, while “racism” represents the attempt of white Gentiles to maintain a similar social cohesion of their own. ”
    This is a phenomenon I have often observed. It’s “racist” and “bigoted” for a person of European “gentile” ancestry to care about or discriminate on the basis of common ancestry, but “antisemitic” (and hence bigoted and racist) to object to when Jews care about or discriminate on the basis of common ancestry.
    The word “antisemitic” should be stricken from the lexicon. “Racist”—-meaning discrimination based on background/ancestry——should suffice.

    It should be stricken from the lexicon because it simply makes no sense. The word “Semite” refers to:

    “a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs” or “a descendant of these peoples.”

    So how did “anti-Semitism” come to refer only to anti-Jewish sentiment?

    Further, the only group mentioned above that most would equate with modern Jews is the Hebrews, and their relation is rather dubious.

    A “bottom line” would be that most people who identify as Jewish are not Semitic while most Arabs are. Simplistic, but largely true.

    Note too, that while the definition I gave above is from Merriam Webster, if you “Google” it the first result Google returns is this:

    “a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic language, including in particular the Jews and Arabs.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    So what is Palestinian language?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  119. Heros says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Well, I suppose jews had read Mein Kampf, where jews are called schmarotzer, parasites.
    Now for me the basic moral question of WII is simple: was Hitler right in drastically reducing jewish influence in Germany, or were jews right in trying to remove Hitler ?

    Such conflicts are not seldom in history.
    Michel Rostovtzeff, 'Geschichte der Alten Welt, erster Band, Der Orient und Griechenland', Bremen 1961 (The History of the Ancient World), page 445: Antiochos IV tried by force to impose Greek culture in Judea. Jews responded with a vehement national reaction, that led them into almost complete segregation in religion and customs.

    I'd like to add that I wonder how much longer common USA citizens accept the present jewish influence in the USA.
    If people as Wolfowitz, Soros and Netanyahu had any common sense, they would ask themselves if for jewry the moment for a complete change of jewish behaviour is not necessary now.
    I here quoted Katz 'can it happen again ?'.
    I suppose it can, though I see gas chambers for humans as a fairy tale.
    After Pearl Harbour the USA was quite capable of interning anyone Japanese or of japanese descent in concentration camps.

    Stephen Steinlight wrote that in case of disaster there would always be Israel to go to.
    He did not realise that, in my opinion, Israel is wholly dependent on USA support.
    The Samsom option will not save jewish lives, on the contrary.

    “jews are called schmarotzer, parasites.”

    I’ll have to remember that one. If anyone ever calls me a schmarotzer I’ll declare war on him and hire a bunch of sadistc jewish communists to ritually murder his family. That’ll teach him not to call me a parasite.

    As I linked above, Mossad has assassinated 800 people in the last 10 years, it still hasn’t stopped, the jewish war of blood lust against goyim. This has been going on for centuries, anti-semitism is really nothing more than jewish projection and gaslighting of the goyim. Please read this article for more information. Nothing Hitler did was wrong, just ask Bibi:

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578

    ““Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked public uproar when on Tuesday he claimed that the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, was the one who planted the idea of the extermination of European Jewry in Adolf Hitler’s mind. The Nazi ruler, Netanyahu said, had no intention of killing the Jews, but only to expel them.

    Of coures, Bibi is also gaslighting the goyim here, we know that he will make up other lies about Hitler as soon as it is convenient or necessary. The point is that the jews used their Polish and Czech puppets to attack Germany after the jews had publicly declared war in 1933. Now we know that the President of Czechoslovakia was tied to the jews through the blood sacrifice of Christian children, and Pole Buffoon was also dancing on their string, as were the 3 stooges Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin.

    Judea started the second world war, there is no longer any question.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  120. nagra says:
    @Dan
    It should be stricken from the lexicon because it simply makes no sense. The word "Semite" refers to:

    "a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs" or "a descendant of these peoples."

    So how did "anti-Semitism" come to refer only to anti-Jewish sentiment?

    Further, the only group mentioned above that most would equate with modern Jews is the Hebrews, and their relation is rather dubious.

    A "bottom line" would be that most people who identify as Jewish are not Semitic while most Arabs are. Simplistic, but largely true.

    Note too, that while the definition I gave above is from Merriam Webster, if you "Google" it the first result Google returns is this:

    "a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic language, including in particular the Jews and Arabs."

    So what is Palestinian language?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  121. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:

    In my naive younger years, I used to admire the Jews a great deal, mostly for their enormous success in finance, entertainment and educational attainment. To me they were a people who succeed despite 2,000 years of persecution, and are simply the smartest people around. They seemed to dominate every field despite being such a small percentage of the world’s population, a mere 15 million out of 7 billion.

    But these days I’m increasingly suspicious of Jewish success. Are they really successful because they are smarter and better than everyone else, or did they simply succeed through a combination of ethnic nepotism, ruthlessness and extreme dishonesty? Dishonest people always make honest people look like fools. They were smart in that they first took over the pantheon of academia, Harvard, and from there, all of our colleges esp. the humanities. From there they educated all future generations of teachers, journalists and took over msm. The rest is history. Once a Jew breaks into an industry, he’ll only hire and promote other jews until they dominate, even those with mediocre talent.

    This ethnic nepotism is the main reason why Hollywood, modern lit and modern art, all dominated by Jews, have produced increasingly degenerative garbage(while being propped up as brilliant masterpieces by Jewish “experts”), while the Scientific Research field has become so dog-eat-dog and dishonest, with researchers stealing each other’s works and ideas. Hollywood, Wall Street, K Street, Academia, Silicon Valley, the Media, judiciary bench, the Deep State — practically all fields dominated by Jews, have descended into cesspools of depravity. It’s as if they can’t help themselves, no matter what field they get into, Jews seek to dominate, then run it to the ground through greed, lust and total lack of self-restraint.

    Jews have hit the jackpot by seizing control of US Deep State. They now pretty much control the world. As usual with their greed for power and money, they want to hold on to that perch for as long as possible — by promoting open borders and multiculturalism, to dilute white power. The media and academia are their biggest propaganda machines. They viciously hunt down and shame all who challenge their dominance(like what Sasha Baron Cohen is doing with his show).

    Jews will run America to the ground the same way they run Wall Street, Hollywood, SV and every industry they dominate to the ground. To defeat this, we need to start with academia, the same way they started, by taking back control of the pantheon of academia, Harvard. We must either defeat affirmative action, or make Harvard and the Higher Ed cartel irrelevant by promoting online learning, and hiring and promoting those who are self-taught through MOOCs.

    Read More
    • Agree: renfro
    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    You have just raised the most important point.
    (You have my highest respect)
    And that is why Jews were always persecuted, and they will be persecuted.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  122. phil says:
    @Anon

    Chaim Weizman, the future president of Israel, later promoted the story
     
    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.

    David Irving found a document in Weizmann’s archives saying that, not only had Jews gotten the US into WWI; they could also get the US into WWII.

    Astonishing when you really think about it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    US was mostly a watcher in both wars you have mentioned
    both the US and the UK charged even for boot laces in gold
    , @Anon
    Citation?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  123. peterAUS says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.
     
    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion---mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever "the holocaust" may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice "victim"---Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you---is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    A thoughtful post.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  124. nagra says:
    @phil
    David Irving found a document in Weizmann's archives saying that, not only had Jews gotten the US into WWI; they could also get the US into WWII.

    Astonishing when you really think about it.

    US was mostly a watcher in both wars you have mentioned
    both the US and the UK charged even for boot laces in gold

    Read More
    • Replies: @phil
    If the US didn't matter, the Jews would not have been so eager to get it involved in both wars.

    The D-Day invasion on June 6, 1944 was not a small operation.
    , @phil
    The Jews think otherwise, and on average they are not dumb.
    , @Ace
    Red Army losses were enormous. U.S. losses were not even close to that. We did not face the cream of the Wehrmacht as the Red Army did. Our losses were not inconsequential, however.

    Don't be an ass.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  125. AaronB says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.
     
    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion---mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever "the holocaust" may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice "victim"---Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you---is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    I would also say that there similarities between parts of the Old Testament and Norse Sagas – both are “heroic epics” on the grand scale.

    What is fascinating is how a “heroic epic” can change form so dramatically over the centuries while retaining the essential kernel and manifest in the most unlikely and unpromising forms.

    And you are surely right that if Whites weren’t materialists but had their own “heroic epics” and so themselves as protagonists in a grand sweeping narrative – as to some extent the Left does – they would have nothing fear from Jews.

    But my experiences on this site have taught me that materialism among whites, while on the wane, is far from a spent force, and I was shocked by the tenacity, rage, and fierceness with which the materialists fight for maintaining their position (witness utu, and many commenters over at Karlin)

    So we are far from out of the tunnel yet, and the metaphysical stupidity of Whites today remains astounding.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    if Whites weren’t materialists but had their own “heroic epics”

    WTF

    We appropriated the Old Testament and it is chock full of heroes.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  126. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB
    You are one of the most original thinkers here - I don't necessarily agree with everything you say, but you say interesting and original things that are out of the box.

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.

    So you won't get much appreciation here - but write for the invisible audience, its worthwhile.

    People on this website like to larp as edgy and nonconformist but in fact people on this site across the board are cliquey conformist group thinkers, and very attached to their sacred cows and pieties which they cannot stand if you challenge.

    Don’t say……

    So you won’t get much appreciation here – but write for the invisible audience, its worthwhile.

    Yup.

    Read More
    • Agree: AaronB
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  127. @Anatoly Karlin
    So about this issue: One time Minister of the Interior Vyacheslav von Plehve estimated that 40% of Russia's revolutionaries were Jews.

    From a 1903 speech:

    In Western Russia some 90% of the revolutionaries are Jews, and in Russia generally - some 40%. I shall not conceal from you that the revolutionary movement in Russia worries us but you should know that if you do not deter your youth from the revolutionary movement, we shall make your position untenable to such an extent that you will have to leave Russia, to the very last man!
     
    He was assassinated in 1904. In fairness, his killer seems to have been an ethnic Russian (Egor Sazonov).

    They don’t make Interior Ministers like that anymore, sadly. Could you imagine any contemporary European or North American Interior Minister saying such a thing to Muslims ?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  128. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @phil
    David Irving found a document in Weizmann's archives saying that, not only had Jews gotten the US into WWI; they could also get the US into WWII.

    Astonishing when you really think about it.

    Citation?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Phil
    The Weizmann archives in Israel. Watch David Irving’s YouTube videos on Himmler and other subjects; he talks about including it for publication.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  129. Wally says:
    @phil
    The article at holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com says:

    'It is highly significant that among this enormous collection of secret German records, not a single one provides any evidence of mass killing, or even refers to a German wartime policy or program of “extermination.” To the contrary, many of these documents — such as those cited in this article — further demonstrate the seriousness of the efforts by high-level government and SS authorities to maintain the health of inmates by combating disease in the camps.'

    However, David Irving has been touting correspondence between Heinrich Himmler (head of the SS) and a German statistician that indicates that the number of Jews executed in the Reinhardt Camps of Eastern Poland was in the millions, not even counting the many thousands of Jews who were allegedly shot by mobile units that operated in Eastern Europe after the launch of Operation Barbarossa in 1941. He also refers to documents in which Himmler indicates a desire to conceal information about mass deaths from Hitler.

    Will the debate end up being between Irving, who lost a famous court case as a "denier," vs real denialists?

    See Irving's Youtube "The Life and Death of Heinrich Himmler." See also the document "Himmler Decodes" (British intercepts of Himmler's correspondence) at Irving's website.

    I assume Irving is referring to the Korherr Report, which is laughable, it says nothing about killing Jews.

    The Korherr Report is explained by Richard Korherr himself:

    The well-known, racially persecuted writer H.G. Adler, previously resident in Prague, now in London, wrote in the foreword to the second edition to his extraordinary book Theresienstadt 1941-1945 in 1960:

    “It has definitely been determined that the designation of Dr. Korherr as SS-statistician…is not true, because he never belonged to the SS and has been rehabilitated insofar as his behaviour in the National Socialist years is concerned.”

    Unfortunately, Der Spiegel is publishing the claim of the English historian Irving that in the spring of 1942, at Himmler’s order, I calculated the number of Jewish victims. In fact, these figures along with the text were delivered to me in completed form by the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA) with the order that not one word or figure was to be changed.

    The statement that I had claimed in this regard that more than a million Jews had died as a result of special treatment in the camps in German-occupied Poland and in the Warthegau is also incorrect. I have to protest against the word “died” in this context.

    It was precisely the term “special treatment” (sonderbehandlung) that motivated me to inquire of the RSHA by telephone what this term meant. I received the answer that it referred to Jews who would be settled in the District of Lublin.

    - Dr. Richard Korherr

    Braunschweig Nr. 28, July 1977, p. 72-74, Der SPIEGEL, an article commenting on the controversy surrounding David Irving’s book “Hitler’s War” under the title : HITLER — Kecke Revision.
    Korherr’s letter appears among a series of reactions (“Hitler gegen Irving”) by people like Robert M. W. Kempner or the historians John Toland and Hans-Heinrich Wilhelm An English translation of the letter was presented during Udo Walendy’s testimony at the Zündel trial 1988.

    Another recommended take down on the Irving claims about the Korherr Report:
    The Razor and the Ring, by John Weir

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3008/?lang=en

    Read More
    • Replies: @Phil
    Wally,
    I am not fully satisfied, but I do believe that deniers have some strong points on their side. Korherr apparently asked for clarification on the telephone about the term ‘special treatment.’ Whether he was given a truthful or adequate answer is open to dispute. The piece by John Weir is partly rhetorical, but provides interesting information about other documents. Some documents do indeed indicate a desire by the Germans to deport large numbers to the east.
    Deniers have strong arguments about the lack of physical evidence for millions of dead bodies. On the other hand, there must of been much resistance to the round-up of Jews, so it seems possible to me that there were thousands of shootings and decentralized burials and/or burnings. However, there also seems to be a strong case for the vast majority of people having been deported from transit camps and to the East. We should hear from Irving in either a revised or more comprehensive way—or else he is left with a highly questionable position.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  130. Taco Town says:
    @renfro
    Unz has given us a accurate, dispassionate summation on what is called anti Semitism.
    Well done.

    I am curious how those here who dislike Jews came to that dislike. From comments it seems that Jewish 'politics' (interference in US policies & Israel) and their control of most of our press, media (the censorship, slants and lowering of social and moral standards) are the two main complaints.
    For me it grew after I began a study of the Mid East post 911 and came across a section about Zionism in the ME in the British National Archives. That led me back to the US and the Jewish lobby and thru Jewish activities in the US beginning even before 1948. I absolutely did not want to believe that a Jewish or any other 'cabal' was controlling much of our government....but that is the way the cookie crumbled on the facts. And these 'facts' did not come from books, they came from months and months and months, years actually, of combing thru documents at the Library of Congress, every bill and resolution passed dealing with Jewish interest and Israel, every presidential library, all the MOUs and declassified documents and on and on.

    The only question I have had since then is what do we do about it? We have to end Jewish entitlement in the US before we can end the unholy US-Israel relationship.

    One thing I want to add to this:


    So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger.
     
    Is that the ordinary Jews will never stand up to the Fifth Column Jews because even the ordinary Jews benefit too much from the uber Jews hold on our government. I could go on and on about the many special favors US Jews get, the 90% of Homeland Security funds, the extra social services government money awarded 'only' to Jewish organizations, .....I could fill this entre site with all the gifts congress has given to the Jews courtesy of US taxpayers. You can even find awards to Jewish groups in various politicians 'earmarks' for gawds sake.....people have no idea, none at all about how truly deep they go into our tax money thru every agency in the US. It even involves 'promoting Jews' , as when Schumer several years ago required the pentagon to review records of all Jews serving in WWII and come up with some 'heroes' who didn't get medals because of anti semitism.

    I would love to see Ron put his extra sharp mind to some research and do an article on this alone.

    Bottom line the Jews aren't going to give up their special benefits. But maybe if enough 'ordinary Americans' learn that they are 'not special and are third class citizens' below the Entitled Jews they will rise up and get loud.

    Three answers:

    1. I came to my current opinion via “where there’s smoke there’s fire” reasoning. Reading alternative commentary on the internet has simply added up.
    2. I don’t distrust Jews specifically so much as I distrust the progressive left. Any opinion of Jews that I have is based on the strong correlation between the Jewish people and the progressive left.
    3. What to do about it? Defeat and suppress the progressive left.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    . I don’t distrust Jews specifically so much as I distrust the progressive left. Any opinion of Jews that I have is based on the strong correlation between the Jewish people and the progressive left.
     
    Its not that simple....I think you are basing that opinion on Jewish influence on immigration, social immorality etc etc.. within the 'left'.
    The fact is there is more anti Israel at least in the left and more pro Israel within the right....the right is totally blind, or pretends to be, to what the Jews promote to US society--immigration, gays, socialism which is what the that conservatives are totally against...so go figure.
    For both parties their stand on jews and Israel comes down to where their money comes from.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  131. LSJohn says:
    @for-the-record
    A very good example of "Anti-semitism" is Lindbergh's "notorious" speech in Des Moines in September 1941, which is inevitably trotted out whenever anyone (Pat Buchanan, Trump) starts talking of any independent ("isolationist") foreign policy. Lindbergh, heretofore, an American icon, was forever after tarnished goods.

    It is interesting to read the text of his speech today, and compare it to the reaction it elicited (and still elicits).

    Here is a link to the speech:

    http://www.charleslindbergh.com/americanfirst/speech.asp

    and here is a summary of the manner in which it was received by the nation's press (courtesy of the JTA, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency):

    https://www.jta.org/1941/09/15/archive/lindberghs-anti-jewish-speech-meets-with-severe-criticism-in-american-press

    Finally, here is a compilation of the "anti-Semitic" parts of the speech:

    The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration . . .

    The second major group I mentioned is the Jewish.

    It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race.

    No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its consequences.

    Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far-sighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not.

    Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.

    I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.

    We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.
     
    It is highly recommended to read the whole speech, as it offers an equally astute analysis of the other two principal actors of US intervention in the war.

    Thanks.

    Lindbergh really got a bad rap, and still does.

    After Pearl Harbor he tried to re-enlist in the Air Service but was spitefully denied for his earlier opposition to the war. He went to work for Henry Ford as a consultant to the production of B-24s.

    In early ’44 he went to the Pacific and flew 50 combat missions as a civilian “Tech Rep.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  132. Anon[409] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome
    Dreyfus affair was a fake incedent or hoax designed to create a public anti-semitism controversy.

    Would you care to elaborate on that, how the hoax worked, who was responsible and, above all evidence, sources?

    Or should we take it as supporting material for being put in the same ward as Wally?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  133. Moi says:
    @Wally
    Unz said:
    "... the ability of a relatively small number of agitated and energetic Jews to police the acceptable boundaries of historical narratives may have enormous consequences for our larger society, deterring scholars from objectively reporting historical facts and preventing students from discovering them."

    The absolute best examples of that are the fake '6M Jews and gas chambers", forgetting for the moment the equally fraudulent '5M others' used by Jews to essentially buy votes for their agenda.

    It's quite bizarre that Jews actually want 6M Jews to be dead. Revisionists bring Jews good news. Jews should be elated to know that 6,000,000 of their brethren were not murdered.

    Truth can no longer be stopped. Regardless of "Holocau$t Industry" lies, their religion does not hold up to scientific, rational scrutiny.

    Be part of the solution:
    The '6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers' are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the 'holocaust' scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    Though I don’t know if this is true, I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel’s victory in the ’67 war. After that there was a flood of holocaust books. Can anyone shed some light on this….

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro
    The Jews power and influence in every US sector came to full bloom in the 60's .
    This was about 40 years after the huge wave of 2 million + Jewish immigrants between 1890 and 1920.
    During those 40 years they took full advantages of their increased numbers and opportunities in the US to fully penetrate academia, media and government.....putting them in the positions and to further gin up the holocaust industry and Israel narrative.

    If you look at the bios of almost every single member of the current Fifth Column Jews you will see that their parents were 1900's immigrants, mostly Polish and other eastern European countries, very few of German origin.
    , @renfro

    I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel’s victory in the ’67 war
     
    Regarding the 67 war.....the Jews embraced it and were emboldened by it because it was a sort of sexual climax release from the Jews historical impotence and powerlessness and especially during WWII. ....they wanted to see themselves as warriors and heroes .
    , @anon
    The first I ever read anything about it was an article in Esquire in 1967 about Treblinka.
    It certainly picked up speed, though.
    By 1977, Germans in Australia were commonly referred to as Jewburners.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  134. @iffen
    Most leftists:

    Each successful Jew has attained his position because of that particular individual's agency.

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.

    Do blacks, women, browns, etc. have agency?

    Haven’t you left out “empowerment” (individual division)? I’m sure it belongs in their somewhere.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Haven’t you left out “empowerment”

    Good point. I'm not sure where they think it comes from or how to get it, only that it is a good thing; a sort of amulet that can be wielded by any individual regardless of the individual's otherwise limitations.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  135. Wally says:
    @phil
    The article at holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com says:

    'It is highly significant that among this enormous collection of secret German records, not a single one provides any evidence of mass killing, or even refers to a German wartime policy or program of “extermination.” To the contrary, many of these documents — such as those cited in this article — further demonstrate the seriousness of the efforts by high-level government and SS authorities to maintain the health of inmates by combating disease in the camps.'

    However, David Irving has been touting correspondence between Heinrich Himmler (head of the SS) and a German statistician that indicates that the number of Jews executed in the Reinhardt Camps of Eastern Poland was in the millions, not even counting the many thousands of Jews who were allegedly shot by mobile units that operated in Eastern Europe after the launch of Operation Barbarossa in 1941. He also refers to documents in which Himmler indicates a desire to conceal information about mass deaths from Hitler.

    Will the debate end up being between Irving, who lost a famous court case as a "denier," vs real denialists?

    See Irving's Youtube "The Life and Death of Heinrich Himmler." See also the document "Himmler Decodes" (British intercepts of Himmler's correspondence) at Irving's website.

    As for the claimed mass shootings of Jews, the fraudulent “Holocaust Industry” now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.

    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the ‘holocaust’ propganda is the message.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous

    so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains
     
    Have there been excavations at these sites?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  136. Anon[267] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    Russia is assassinating people on UK soil with nerve gas. There is a fair degree of reason for the UK to be wary of them.

    The Skirpals were killed with a poison developed at the British defense department facility at Porton Downs, just a few miles from where they were poisoned.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    the Skirpals are still alive
    disregard @ jeff the stryker
    all he has is the nonsense
    , @Druid
    Really, amazing that after being killed, they're still alive and in British hands!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  137. anon[148] • Disclaimer says:

    My advice is to keep your head, and don’t let this drive you crazy as it has to so many. No matter what your genetic background, be yourself. Take what good your culture may have given you, reject the bad and the superstitious, and live life as best you can with the DNA you’ve got.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ace
    Refreshing. Thank you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  138. nagra says:

    it might be Gandhi saying
    if you see two fish in the ocean fighting
    you’ll find some Britishmen (a Kingsman) around

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  139. Silva says:
    @Anatoly Karlin
    Leftists, as blank slate opponents of "privilege", should be more anti-Semitic than right-wingers by default. Anything else is dishonest.

    It’s possible to be Leftist and non-blank-slatist (or to be blank-slatist on race, but consider inherited culture decisive). I (non-Jew) always was, and notice growing numbers of Jews becoming of late: of course, it’s from that position that one can try to argue Jews deserve all the power they have, and blacks more than they have (at you-know-who’s expense, they being at fault) – but I think (e.g.) Ron’s analysis is plenty for one to think “they have actually superior ability (be it cultural or genetic) *and* corrupt collusion”.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  140. Moi says:
    @Jeff Stryker
    English Left vs. US Left

    Pakistani Brits will naturally veer towards the Left for the generous welfare (Comparatively) and minority perks, same as US blacks and Hispanics. But of course they are Pakistanis so they hate Jews.

    American never had substantial Muslim immigration. So the Jewish have always been Left.

    It seems to me Jews are like the Indian Brahmins who want to keep control of the lower castes/peoples.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Druid
    So true
    , @anonymous
    Hence why the two are such loving bedfellows. You should read some of the most nauseating verbal fellation each other engage in some forums.

    The clergy of the Judenscum went so far as to proclaim that Hindoo paganism is not Avodah Zarah (idolatry). Say what?

    Yeah, you scratch my nethers, I scratch yours...
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  141. Gullibility doesn’t truck with exaggeration and its companion, mendacity…

    It takes a diamond to cut diamond and poison to cut poison thus it takes a Jew to expose…

    I’ve stated before without exaggeration I haven’t met a Jew that I didn’t like…

    I envy you, Ron Unz, for being able to dig up the material, and the fact that there is so much of it thanks to the record keeping, first, in European nations including Imperial Russia and second, in the Americas, whereas, if Hindu India ever wants to know how their ‘Jews’, the Jains, managed to impoverish the local Slavs, the Indian landed and landless peasantry. Of course, India was ‘blessed’ with many a type of Jew, including the real ones (which counted in its midst the local Bene Israeli, the Kochin Jews, the Baghdadi Jews and last but not least, the Ashkenazi that piggybacked with the British) unlike its linguistic sister, Europa. But for the lack of types of record with which you and others who discuss Jews and their positive as well as nefarious behaviour, the Hindu can’t discover the malpractice by Jains, which has impacted him the most since time immemorial, in spite of being curious. Sadly, the dharmic attitude of believing that one’s karma guides the fate, thus excessive desire to uncover your oppressor is swept away in fear of engendering additional negative credit and thus silently suffering the evil.

    Needless to say, a time will come when Jews will face up to the evils their forefathers may have engaged in and perhaps setting an example for others in non white Christian societies to fess up and modify their egregious mercantile behavior. Until such time, you enforce my belief that non-Jews’Jews behave just as badly, save the ritual blood drawing part, for after all, the Jain is a firm believer in ahimsa (the practice of nonviolence) to animals, while committing himsa (violence) to fellow human beings, who just happened to be non-Jains, i. e. the rest of humanity.

    P. S. It would be very interesting when the blood suckers of world will come into conflict over the loot and who will be victorious… I am putting my shekels on the lowly Chinese, for he is a godless materialist, who doesn’t get into the socio-culture of the host societies and he will eat a porker or a dog or a cat without bringing in the superstitious hogwash of religion. Let the games begin!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Druid
    I would like to know more about what you say about the Jains.
    , @anonymous
    Yes, you are right. Jains are as cultist as the Judens. Just 4+ million.

    Jain is a firm believer in ahimsa (the practice of nonviolence) to animals, while committing himsa (violence) to fellow human beings
     
    Yes, sometimes against their deluded own... starved by her own parents, and a demented pagan ideology.

    https://www.ndtv.com/hyderabad-news/13-year-old-jain-girl-dies-in-hyderabad-after-fasting-for-68-days-1471700

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  142. nagra says:

    enough said

    the jew one

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  143. nagra says:

    show me some ‘palestinian’ as such please
    ( :

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  144. renfro says:
    @Taco Town
    Three answers:

    1. I came to my current opinion via “where there’s smoke there’s fire” reasoning. Reading alternative commentary on the internet has simply added up.
    2. I don’t distrust Jews specifically so much as I distrust the progressive left. Any opinion of Jews that I have is based on the strong correlation between the Jewish people and the progressive left.
    3. What to do about it? Defeat and suppress the progressive left.

    . I don’t distrust Jews specifically so much as I distrust the progressive left. Any opinion of Jews that I have is based on the strong correlation between the Jewish people and the progressive left.

    Its not that simple….I think you are basing that opinion on Jewish influence on immigration, social immorality etc etc.. within the ‘left’.
    The fact is there is more anti Israel at least in the left and more pro Israel within the right….the right is totally blind, or pretends to be, to what the Jews promote to US society–immigration, gays, socialism which is what the that conservatives are totally against…so go figure.
    For both parties their stand on jews and Israel comes down to where their money comes from.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  145. Art says:

    Mr. Unz: “extraordinary Jewish fecundity”

    fecundity
    noun
    1. the ability to produce an abundance of offspring or new growth; fertility.

    the ability to produce many new ideas.

    “the immense fecundity of his imagination made a profound impact on European literature”

    It is the Jews immense fecundity of imagination – it is the Jews immense ability to concoct a series of lies – that sets them apart from the rest of humanity. They believe that they have the ability to endlessly keep humanity off balance through lies. For the last seventy years the Jews have had their way with the truth.

    That is starting to come to an end. The Unz Review and American Pravda are kick starting the end of this darkness.

    The foundation of Zionism – the mendacious Talmud and its anti-human character is now exposed.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  146. nagra says:
    @Anon
    The Skirpals were killed with a poison developed at the British defense department facility at Porton Downs, just a few miles from where they were poisoned.

    the Skirpals are still alive
    disregard @ jeff the stryker
    all he has is the nonsense

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Thanks for the information.
    , @annamaria
    Agree. Considering the riches of available info on Skripals Affair, "jeff the stryker" is a petty provocateur littering this forum.

    Jewish State and WMD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
    "Israel has not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)... There are speculations that a chemical weapons program might be located at the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR) in Ness Ziona. ...

    Israel is not a signatory to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). The US Congress Office of Technology Assessment records Israel as a country possessing a long-term, undeclared biological warfare program.

    Israel has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), but supports establishment of a Middle East Zone free of weapons of mass destruction."
    --- The hypocrites through and through.

    List of targeted killings [assasinations] performed by Israel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Israeli_assassinations

    A sample of Israeli assassinations: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/04/mossad-carries-assassinations-180422152144736.html

    Mossad idiots: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/tourists-with-a-license-to-kill-a-look-at-the-mossad-s-assassination-squads-a-678805.html

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  147. Anonymous[192] • Disclaimer says:
    @raymond_k_hessel
    this is in no way meant to be inflammatory, derogatory or conspiratorial; however, does the author have any opinion regarding the authenticity of the protocols.

    i have read them, and the scheme depicted therein is a cogent, thoughtful, and disciplined plan which appears to be coming to some form of fruition, and is in no way as nebulous, and ill-defined as the much more academically accepted oracles of nostradamus.

    Read Unz last article where he goes over the Protocols.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  148. renfro says:
    @Moi
    Though I don't know if this is true, I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel's victory in the '67 war. After that there was a flood of holocaust books. Can anyone shed some light on this....

    The Jews power and influence in every US sector came to full bloom in the 60′s .
    This was about 40 years after the huge wave of 2 million + Jewish immigrants between 1890 and 1920.
    During those 40 years they took full advantages of their increased numbers and opportunities in the US to fully penetrate academia, media and government…..putting them in the positions and to further gin up the holocaust industry and Israel narrative.

    If you look at the bios of almost every single member of the current Fifth Column Jews you will see that their parents were 1900′s immigrants, mostly Polish and other eastern European countries, very few of German origin.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    MarkTwain was in the area in his time
    it was a pretty empty according to him

    then Jews came and they've opened it economically and land worth something
    which than attracted Arabs to move in pretending to be palestinians nowadays
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  149. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @nagra
    the Skirpals are still alive
    disregard @ jeff the stryker
    all he has is the nonsense

    Thanks for the information.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  150. renfro says:
    @Moi
    Though I don't know if this is true, I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel's victory in the '67 war. After that there was a flood of holocaust books. Can anyone shed some light on this....

    I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel’s victory in the ’67 war

    Regarding the 67 war…..the Jews embraced it and were emboldened by it because it was a sort of sexual climax release from the Jews historical impotence and powerlessness and especially during WWII. ….they wanted to see themselves as warriors and heroes .

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    [It would be much better if you made greater effort to follow proper capitalization, spelling, spacing, and punctuation, especially if you're leaving such a large number of comments.]

    there was also war in 1948
    five Arab counties attacked
    a from the every single side
    they've lost such enterprise

    you loose war you loose territory
    that is really how the war works

    sometimes for strategic reasons
    get mature and simple get a real
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  151. @anon
    In my naive younger years, I used to admire the Jews a great deal, mostly for their enormous success in finance, entertainment and educational attainment. To me they were a people who succeed despite 2,000 years of persecution, and are simply the smartest people around. They seemed to dominate every field despite being such a small percentage of the world's population, a mere 15 million out of 7 billion.

    But these days I'm increasingly suspicious of Jewish success. Are they really successful because they are smarter and better than everyone else, or did they simply succeed through a combination of ethnic nepotism, ruthlessness and extreme dishonesty? Dishonest people always make honest people look like fools. They were smart in that they first took over the pantheon of academia, Harvard, and from there, all of our colleges esp. the humanities. From there they educated all future generations of teachers, journalists and took over msm. The rest is history. Once a Jew breaks into an industry, he'll only hire and promote other jews until they dominate, even those with mediocre talent.

    This ethnic nepotism is the main reason why Hollywood, modern lit and modern art, all dominated by Jews, have produced increasingly degenerative garbage(while being propped up as brilliant masterpieces by Jewish "experts"), while the Scientific Research field has become so dog-eat-dog and dishonest, with researchers stealing each other's works and ideas. Hollywood, Wall Street, K Street, Academia, Silicon Valley, the Media, judiciary bench, the Deep State -- practically all fields dominated by Jews, have descended into cesspools of depravity. It's as if they can't help themselves, no matter what field they get into, Jews seek to dominate, then run it to the ground through greed, lust and total lack of self-restraint.

    Jews have hit the jackpot by seizing control of US Deep State. They now pretty much control the world. As usual with their greed for power and money, they want to hold on to that perch for as long as possible -- by promoting open borders and multiculturalism, to dilute white power. The media and academia are their biggest propaganda machines. They viciously hunt down and shame all who challenge their dominance(like what Sasha Baron Cohen is doing with his show).

    Jews will run America to the ground the same way they run Wall Street, Hollywood, SV and every industry they dominate to the ground. To defeat this, we need to start with academia, the same way they started, by taking back control of the pantheon of academia, Harvard. We must either defeat affirmative action, or make Harvard and the Higher Ed cartel irrelevant by promoting online learning, and hiring and promoting those who are self-taught through MOOCs.

    You have just raised the most important point.
    (You have my highest respect)
    And that is why Jews were always persecuted, and they will be persecuted.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  152. Anon[826] • Disclaimer says:

    What the Jews did in the past is debatable but that they now dominate US policy is not.

    So Jews are perhaps more likely to screw up than say Anglos because of their blind attachment to Israel. In any case it does not matter who is to blame for extreme immigration and off-shoring of jobs. That is where we are today. Undoubtedly Jews were major contributor to our current problems.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  153. nagra says:
    @renfro
    The Jews power and influence in every US sector came to full bloom in the 60's .
    This was about 40 years after the huge wave of 2 million + Jewish immigrants between 1890 and 1920.
    During those 40 years they took full advantages of their increased numbers and opportunities in the US to fully penetrate academia, media and government.....putting them in the positions and to further gin up the holocaust industry and Israel narrative.

    If you look at the bios of almost every single member of the current Fifth Column Jews you will see that their parents were 1900's immigrants, mostly Polish and other eastern European countries, very few of German origin.

    MarkTwain was in the area in his time
    it was a pretty empty according to him

    then Jews came and they’ve opened it economically and land worth something
    which than attracted Arabs to move in pretending to be palestinians nowadays

    Read More
    • Disagree: Zumbuddi
    • Troll: renfro
    • Replies: @unseated
    Palestine in 1948:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGBoGKPZlQE

    "Making the desert bloom - a myth examined " by Alan George.
    , @Druid
    Idiot Zio fascist
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  154. iffen says:
    @AaronB
    I would also say that there similarities between parts of the Old Testament and Norse Sagas - both are "heroic epics" on the grand scale.

    What is fascinating is how a "heroic epic" can change form so dramatically over the centuries while retaining the essential kernel and manifest in the most unlikely and unpromising forms.

    And you are surely right that if Whites weren't materialists but had their own "heroic epics" and so themselves as protagonists in a grand sweeping narrative - as to some extent the Left does - they would have nothing fear from Jews.

    But my experiences on this site have taught me that materialism among whites, while on the wane, is far from a spent force, and I was shocked by the tenacity, rage, and fierceness with which the materialists fight for maintaining their position (witness utu, and many commenters over at Karlin)

    So we are far from out of the tunnel yet, and the metaphysical stupidity of Whites today remains astounding.

    if Whites weren’t materialists but had their own “heroic epics”

    WTF

    We appropriated the Old Testament and it is chock full of heroes.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists - the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    German reader who thinks we shouldn't contact aliens because it would be dangerous? Daniel Chieh who thinks our problems are caused by some random genetic process and the solution is to colonize many planets and isolate them from each other so when the random POZ occurs it won't spread?

    Reiner Tor who has resigned himself to obsolescence because no solutions are obvious from within the materialist paradigm?

    Or utu with his old school anti-Semitism and complete inability to grasp metaphysics and his simplistic binary way of thinking where materialism is the underlying principle?

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story - and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  155. nagra says:
    @renfro

    I read somewhere there were actually very few books published about the holocaust until Israel’s victory in the ’67 war
     
    Regarding the 67 war.....the Jews embraced it and were emboldened by it because it was a sort of sexual climax release from the Jews historical impotence and powerlessness and especially during WWII. ....they wanted to see themselves as warriors and heroes .

    [It would be much better if you made greater effort to follow proper capitalization, spelling, spacing, and punctuation, especially if you're leaving such a large number of comments.]

    there was also war in 1948
    five Arab counties attacked
    a from the every single side
    they’ve lost such enterprise

    you loose war you loose territory
    that is really how the war works

    sometimes for strategic reasons
    get mature and simple get a real

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    We’ve all heard the arguments that Arabs moved in to work for Jews back in 1900 to 1940. We’ve all heard the argument that to the victor belongs the land We’ve all heard the arguments that the Arabs left during the battles and therefore the Jews had the God given right to take over their real estate, homes, businesses farms and other property.

    Those are nursery school level Zionist arguments. We’re all Stanford Harvard PhD & professor level anti Zionists.

    Your arguments would go over in a Jewish private school Kindergarten, or a Hadassah luncheon but not here.
    , @ploni almoni
    Why, what big teeth you have grandma.
    , @Druid
    Hey nagar. You seem to be a new commenter here. We've heard all your BS before and it has been debunked repeatedly. You obviously are a new paid troll. Get a life !
    , @iffen
    Keep on keeping on, nagra, you'll run them out of debunking oil yet.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  156. iffen says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    Haven't you left out "empowerment" (individual division)? I'm sure it belongs in their somewhere.

    Haven’t you left out “empowerment”

    Good point. I’m not sure where they think it comes from or how to get it, only that it is a good thing; a sort of amulet that can be wielded by any individual regardless of the individual’s otherwise limitations.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  157. Anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally
    As for the claimed mass shootings of Jews, the fraudulent "Holocaust Industry" now claims that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were shot by the Einsatzgruppen into huge pits, so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains that are claimed to exist, their locations are allegedly known.

    Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the 'holocaust' propganda is the message.

    www.codoh.com

    so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains

    Have there been excavations at these sites?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Mike P
    Guess.
    , @Wally
    There have been some claimed and dishonest attempts to claim that millions of jew corpses have been found, but they found only button, combs and ordinary backyard stuff.
    In spite of not finding what's alleged it hasn't stopped from claiming the opposite. No surprise there. The entire matter pure bluff. The excuses they come up with are laughable.
    I recommend that you visit www.codoh.com for more, and visit their forum to ask questions and read the huge amount of debunking information that has been collected.

    Think about, real verifiable, witnessed, and displayed archaeology excavations would end Revisionism overnight. Yet we see nothing other lies.
    CODOH has tons on the absolutely fraudulent 'holocaust archaelology'.

    ex.:
    The Big Excuse: 'excavation & exhumation of Jews forbidden': https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6817

    Sites Where Excavations Are Physically Obstructed, Blocked: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9171
    just a few examples:
    Treblinka
    https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ch5LK3nycx8/Ub88yvfO2CI/AAAAAAAAABs/cem5kFBXOrg/s1600/Stones+representing+Poland_Treblinka.jpg
    http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/ar/treblinka/treblinkatodaygallery/Treblinka%20monumen%20with%20memorial%20stones.jpg
    Belzec
    http://www.deathcamps.org/belzec/pic/mem2.jpg

    Sobibor Jew corpses claimed here, so why don't they excavate, verify, & show the world? !!!
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10610

    sham archaeologist Caroline Sturdy-Colls caught lying.: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11121

    www.codoh.com
    debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    Only Liars Want Censorship
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  158. @Lot
    "cries of “anti-Semite” soon appeared, and according to Google there are now over 180,000 such hits combining her name and that harsh accusatory term. "

    There are also 186,000 Google results combining her name with the word "ducks."

    What does that prove?

    Everything you want. Dude, technology is amazing. It basically means the United States is looking more and more like Orwell’s vision of the future in 1984. But with smartphones and flavored iced coffee.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  159. jsm says:
    @Colin Wright
    One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it.

    This contrasts vividly with the immediate accusations of 'anti-semitism' one provokes if one criticizes Israel. I've been labeled an 'anti-semite' myself for attacking Israel. The prominent professor Deborah Lipstadt has called Jeremy Corbyn's views 'soft-core anti-semitism' -- simply because he refuses to actually endorse Israeli criminality. Jimmy Carter has been called an 'anti--semite' for daring to point out some of Israel's more outrageous practices. The brilliant and otherwise impeccably progressive Norm Finkelstein was not merely denied tenure for his views; there were actual efforts to get him evicted from his apartment. These figures are all supposedly 'anti-semites' -- and as such, to be persecuted, hounded, and if possible, forced to recant.

    This strikes me as ridiculous: would one be labeled as an anti-German bigot if one objected to Nazism? Would a ferocious anti-Communism be considered proof that one hated Russians?

    The point, though, is that those who wield the club of labelling all and sundry 'anti-semites' don't seem to care about anti-semitism at all, per se. As many here manage to unconsciously demonstrate, you can voice the most unmeasured anti-semitism without fear of condemnation.

    On the other hand, as I've enumerated, there are examples of people being criticised, persecuted, hounded from their jobs for attacking Israel. However, the unfortunate Professor Toaff is the only example I can think of of anyone being seriously attacked for expressing anti-semitic views as such. Generally, if you're feeling froggy, jump. No one cares.

    What can -- and will -- provoke a response is criticism of Israel. The condemnation of anti-semitism isn't about anti-semitism at all. Much more commonly, it's a useful club to prevent criticism of Israel.

    The point, though, is that those who wield the club of labelling all and sundry ‘anti-semites’ don’t seem to care about anti-semitism at all, per se. As many here manage to unconsciously demonstrate, you can voice the most unmeasured anti-semitism without fear of condemnation.

    That’s the singular most retarded thing I’ve read this year.

    We’re all here under ASSUMED names, because we all know what will befall us professionally and personally if we get doxxed for what we’ve said here.

    Ask Mike Enoch (real name Mike Peinovich) about being doxxed for voicing *measured* anti-semitism, much the less “un”measured anti-semitism

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    No to mention getting physically assaulted, fire bombed. etc.

    recommended:
    French Scholar Who Questioned ‘Gas Chamber’ Claims Recants after Three-Year Campaign of Intimidation and Violence : https://codoh.com/library/document/2421/?lang=en

    Revisionist Historian Suffers Savage Beating * : https://codoh.com/library/document/300/?lang=en

    Revisionist Zündel's Office-Home Damaged in Fire Bomb / Arson Attack, Zionist Group Claims Responsibility : https://codoh.com/library/document/2598/?lang=en

    * https://codoh.com/media/files/Faurisson16.09.1989-700x1043.jpg

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  160. Karl says:

    one or two murders PER CENTURY, do not a “ritual” make

    Every single “ritual” in the Jewish religion, is the subject of reams and reams and reams of open-source written discussion, presenting all possible discussions about “how to do it the kosher way”

    Anytime someone pegs the value of (e.g.) soybeans or winter-wheat wrong…. a clever someone-else can game that to make a buck

    i will find a way to make a buck off of RonUnz’s incorrect “pricing”

    Anyone want to purchase indemnification in case of having your kid “ritually killed” by a Jew? i’ll be happy to take your money

    Read More
    • Replies: @Art
    Anyone want to purchase indemnification in case of having your kid “ritually killed” by a Jew? i’ll be happy to take your money

    Hmm --- how about an indemnity about being economically killed by a Jew?

    Not selling any of those - are you!

    Think Peace --- Do No Harm --- Art

    p.s. Talmudism is Zionist is Israel. Darkness can only beget darkness.

    p.s. America will overcome this darkness.
    , @Heros

    "one or two murders PER CENTURY, do not a “ritual” make"
     
    Of course jews are going to lie, lie, lie and project their depravity and guilt on any and every body else.

    https://twitter.com/cursedsalad/status/946099871492186112
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  161. Wally says:
    @iffen
    Most leftists:

    Each successful Jew has attained his position because of that particular individual's agency.

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.

    Do blacks, women, browns, etc. have agency?

    said:
    “Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.”

    PC nonsense which ignores the low IQs of blacks & browns and the fact that women rarely venture into higher paying STEM fields, nor work the hours of men, nor work the higher paying dangerous & laborious jobs.
    When there are cases of being evenly matched, equally qualified, women actually get higher pay.

    If the mythical ‘same work for less pay’ was a fact then men would never get jobs if profit oriented businesses could hire women for the same job for less money.

    The Marxist ‘Gender Pay Gap’ – Class Struggle Meets Gender Struggle
    Females Actually Earn More Than Their Equally Matched Male Counterparts

    https://sites.google.com/site/deanjackson60/the-marxist-gender-pay-gap—class-struggle-meets-gender-struggle-females-earn-more-than-their-equally-matched-male-counterparts

    Read More
    • Replies: @anonymous

    PC nonsense which ignores the low IQs of blacks & browns
     
    As compared to the lily white geniuses? Aren't those the specimens who go around screaming hilariously how 3 (or 4) is 1... man is god... god is man? How smart do you think they are in trying to prove these illogical delusions?

    Of course, there are plenty of blacks & browns who also go around screaming... 3 (or 4) is 1... etc.!

    I agree, they got nothin'.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  162. T. Weed says:

    This brave article by Unz brought it all back: in 1985 I wrote a letter to the editor of the Hoboken (NJ) Reporter criticizing Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. I became aware of Palestinians because when I was working as a TEFL teacher in the ’70′s in Saudi Arabia I met a couple of them who had been ethnically-cleansed. Before this, like most Americans, I believed the “land without people for a people without land” hoax. So in 1985 I wrote my first letter to a start-up weekly free paper, the Hoboken Reporter, and the letter did not go unnoticed. One writer bragged about his “jew pressure” and warned me to shut up. Well, I didn’t. I wrote another letter, and another, and it was as if I had hit a hornet’s nest. The “swarm”, as Israel Shamir calls Jews who can be counted on to sting any truth-telling intruder, was all over me. The Reporter was also published in several other towns on the West Bank of the Hudson river, Jersey City, Union City, Weehawken, Secaucus, West New York, North Bergen, and my letters, and the replies to them, were published in all. I wrote under a pseudonym, T. Weed, but eventually I was found out and received several threatening phone calls. (I used the pseudonym because I was writing a book under my real name that was published by Random House and Bloomsbury Press, England, called Fool’s Paradise–travels in Saudi Arabia) The letters went on and on, back and forth, for a decade, quite instructive and entertaining, and I collected and published them in a volume called Enough Rope, dedicated to the publisher, a Jew, who gave us all enough rope. He gave us enough rope because, as he admitted in an introduction to the book, the controversy “made” his paper, but he also, in a full page, defended my right to free speech, defended me against tremendous pressure in the form of letters from the Swarm to shut my mouth, these letters always claiming “we are all for free speech, but…”
    That decade of letters, Enough Rope, 1985-1995 still appeals to a new generation of readers. and is on an outdoor table at Symposia Books in Hoboken, $5.00, donated to the store.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    And available online for those not in or near NJ?
    , @Anon
    Good for you!!!
    , @renfro
    Bravo......good for you.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  163. Wally says:
    @jsm
    The point, though, is that those who wield the club of labelling all and sundry ‘anti-semites’ don’t seem to care about anti-semitism at all, per se. As many here manage to unconsciously demonstrate, you can voice the most unmeasured anti-semitism without fear of condemnation.

    That's the singular most retarded thing I've read this year.

    We're all here under ASSUMED names, because we all know what will befall us professionally and personally if we get doxxed for what we've said here.

    Ask Mike Enoch (real name Mike Peinovich) about being doxxed for voicing *measured* anti-semitism, much the less "un"measured anti-semitism

    No to mention getting physically assaulted, fire bombed. etc.

    recommended:
    French Scholar Who Questioned ‘Gas Chamber’ Claims Recants after Three-Year Campaign of Intimidation and Violence : https://codoh.com/library/document/2421/?lang=en

    Revisionist Historian Suffers Savage Beating * : https://codoh.com/library/document/300/?lang=en

    Revisionist Zündel’s Office-Home Damaged in Fire Bomb / Arson Attack, Zionist Group Claims Responsibility : https://codoh.com/library/document/2598/?lang=en

    *

    Read More
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    '...No to mention getting physically assaulted, fire bombed. etc...'

    Point taken. However, there is a specific narrative here that calls the guardians of orthodoxy to arms: ancient Israel -- the Holocaust -- modern Israel-the need to uncritically support Israel. It's not so much anti-semites in general who become the focus of attack, but those who question the specific narrative culminating in 'our only ally and the the only democracy in the Middle East.'

    You can assert the most extravagant things about the Protocols. No one will care. But dare to suggest that Israeli 'archeology' has an agenda, and you're for it.

    It has struck me. It isn't 'antisemitism' that is the issue -- it's not viewed with favor, but no one really cares. It's anything that leads to a critical view of Israel that is targeted. When people object to 'anti-semitism,' nine times out of ten, it's 'anti-Israelism' they're objecting to. Interfere in that narrative, and you'd better have tenure.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  164. Sow the Wind

    “We’re hated, we’re hated, we’re hated.”
    Oh, how hollow it rings.
    People are usually hated
    When they do hateful things.

    http://www.dcdave.com/poet10/010211.html

    The remarkable thing, though, as this article well shows, is how little Jews are hated, and for that we can credit their very powerful opinion molding apparatus.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  165. AaronB says:
    @iffen
    if Whites weren’t materialists but had their own “heroic epics”

    WTF

    We appropriated the Old Testament and it is chock full of heroes.

    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists – the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    German reader who thinks we shouldn’t contact aliens because it would be dangerous? Daniel Chieh who thinks our problems are caused by some random genetic process and the solution is to colonize many planets and isolate them from each other so when the random POZ occurs it won’t spread?

    Reiner Tor who has resigned himself to obsolescence because no solutions are obvious from within the materialist paradigm?

    Or utu with his old school anti-Semitism and complete inability to grasp metaphysics and his simplistic binary way of thinking where materialism is the underlying principle?

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story – and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists – the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    I will concede leftists do believe that they are proponents of the “next” phase of universalism and egalitarianism. I do not concede that Evangelical Christians do not see themselves as protagonists in an epic narrative.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    It is not clear what the long term consequences of the collapse of the traditional family among the peons will be. The upper class families seem to be doing okay.

    Cognizance of cultural rot would seem to tie many of the commenters together, even the ones with Jews on the brain disease.

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story – and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  166. cassandra says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.
     
    I would like to suggest a possible psychological interpretation (and I believe you subsequently alluded to something similar, Mr. Unz) deriving from the gentile and specifically White Christian yearning for something we desperately need and no longer get from our established organs of culture and religion---mortal dread.

    Whatever the causes that prompt Jews to behave as they do, their attempts to manipulate the ideational space of Western nations would all be in vain if the gentiles were not so prone to believe the horror stories involving supposed antisemitism. I think we believe them because we identify with the Jews in these narratives, and we secretly wish that we were them. When we hear of Jews persecuted at every turn, hunted into the night, desperately fighting for survival against a seemingly omnipotent foe, huddled together in their little bands of family and faith, this stirs the sense of adventure and community laying latent in our Northern blood; and out of a spirit of protest against the bathetic banality of our modern lives, we believe. We want to be what the Jews tell us they are. We have to endow something, somewhere with the mantle of the herrenvolk, even if it is no longer ourselves. How we long for an enemy that can truly terrify us, for a challenge that can test our mettle to the breaking point; how we long for the blood-ties, hall-songs, and camaraderie of fighting men and the companionship of our shield maidens. Without such fear there is no love. Without this dread there cannot be the ecstasy, exultation, and triumph to which we feel called.

    Whatever "the holocaust" may mean to the Jews, to us it seems like a great epic poem (with the Jew as hero) which it would be impious not to revere. But since we can no longer openly revel in battles and bloody deeds, we recast the Jew as a victim and transmogrify the heroic impulse into etiolated expressions of moral indignation. The Jew inwardly understands nothing of this, but he has learned how to capitalize on our nature nonetheless, manipulating reactions of ours which he perceives but does not comprehend.

    It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice "victim"---Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you---is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.

    “It may not be too far off to conjecture that every social justice “victim”—Jew, Black, immigrant, or what have you—is simply the repressed and perverted shadow of the White desire for heroism that no longer finds an outlet.”

    Jungian.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  167. Mike P says:
    @Anonymous

    so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains
     
    Have there been excavations at these sites?

    Guess.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  168. cassandra says:
    @Anon

    Chaim Weizman, the future president of Israel, later promoted the story
     
    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.

    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.

    The Declaration was finally made not to Weizmann but Rothschild. Curious, that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @ploni almoni
    That Rothschild was the head of the British Zionist organization in Britain. To who should the Declaration have been addressed? Weizmann was not British. Have you considered informing yourself?
    , @Seraphim
    The Declaration was addressed in fact to the Zionist Federation.

    Why was the letter containing the Declaration addressed to Rothschild?
    I can't better answer it than quoting a short but comprehensive article:

    "The Balfour Declaration - Why Lord Rothschild?" by Neville Teller:
    https://www.jpost.com/Blogs/A-Mid-East-Journal/The-Balfour-Declaration-why-Lord-Rothschild-505748

    "In 1917 the Board of Deputies [of British Jews] was led by David Lindo Alexander, and the AJA [Anglo-Jewish Association] by Claude Montefiore. Both were convinced anti-Zionists. In their view national identity and religion were completely separate. They were Englishmen of the Jewish persuasion. There was no such thing as the Jewish nation, and they saw absolutely no need for a separate state for Jews.
    The Conjoint Committee, composed of selected members from the Board and the AJA , was led jointly by Alexander and Montefiore. Aware that Chaim Weizmann had gained the ear of the prime minister and leading members of the Cabinet, and fearful that the government was on the verge of declaring itself supportive of the Zionist cause, the joint chairmen drew up a statement of their position on the Zionist issue on behalf of the Conjoint Committee. Dated May 17, 1917, they sent it to The Times.
    The editor of The Times, a member of the upper echelons of the British establishment by virtue of his position, was George Geoffrey Dawson. He was certainly aware that prime minister Lloyd George, foreign secretary Lord Balfour, and other Cabinet ministers favored the Zionist cause. It was no secret, either, that a conference had been convened in London by the English Zionist Federation for Sunday, 20 May, 1917.
    No doubt to their disappointment, Alexander and Montefiore did not find their letter in the correspondence columns on Friday 18 May. Nor did it appear in the Saturday edition. The Zionist conference duly took place on the Sunday. As it got under way, Weizmann made a momentous announcement. "I am authorized to state in this assembly that His Majesty's Government is ready to support our plans". For the first time Weizmann declared publicly that the Zionists could rely upon British support and protection during their progress towards their final aim – "the creation of a Jewish Commonwealth in Palestine".
    The wind had been taken out of the Conjoint Committee’s sails. Their letter was held back for another few days, while news of Weizmann’s announcement spread. When it finally appeared on the 24th of May, its attack on Zionism and its argument that establishing a Jewish national identity in Palestine would stamp Jews everywhere as 'strangers in their native lands', seemed petulant and ineffective.
    On the Monday morning The Times published three rebuttals. A letter from Lord Rothschild emphasized that the anti-Zionists did not represent Britain’s Jewish community. Britain’s Chief Rabbi Joseph Hertz asserted that the views of the Conjoint Committee belonged to a very small minority. A letter from Chaim Weizmann, as chairman of the English Zionist Federation, regretted “that there should be even two Jews who think it their duty to exert such influence as they may command against the realization of a hope which has sustained the Jewish nation through 2,000 years of exile, persecution, and temptation.”
    In the next few weeks the pro-Zionist Jewish Chronicle was bombarded with letters and statements from rabbis, readers, community leaders, synagogues, and Jewish organizations, the vast majority opposing the anti-Zionists. The resultant furore led the Board of Deputies to permit a vote to be tabled censuring the Conjoint Committee, and on June 17 it was passed by 56 to 51, with six abstentions – presumably the six Board members on the Committee. The result: the resignation of the Conjoint members, swiftly followed by that of the President of the Board, David Lindo Alexander, the co-signatory of the letter. Elected in his place was Sir Stuart Samuel, elder brother of Herbert Samuel, a former Home Secretary and later to be the first High Commissioner in Palestine.
    When Balfour penned his historic letter only four months later, the Board of Deputies was still heavily tainted by the Conjoint Committee affair, and Samuel had scarcely settled into his new position as its President. The Declaration could not be despatched to an organization so equivocal about Zionism. Lord Rothschild, a leading figure in the Anglo-Jewish community and a strong supporter of Zionism, who had written to The Times to condemn the Conjoint Committee’s statement, was the obvious recipient.
    On Sunday December 2, 1917 London’s Royal Opera House was filled to capacity. Rothschild was chairing a meeting of thanksgiving for the Declaration – thanksgiving directed, one presumes, equally to the Almighty and the British government. Besides the government officials present, Zionist dignitaries were led by Chaim ‎Weizmann and included Nahum Sokolow, secretary-general of the World Zionist Congress, Herbert Samuel and Chief Rabbi Joseph Hertz. After speeches by clergy, officials and even an Arab representative from Palestine, the occasion ended with loud cheers and the audience singing “Hatikvah.”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  169. annamaria says:
    @nagra
    the Skirpals are still alive
    disregard @ jeff the stryker
    all he has is the nonsense

    Agree. Considering the riches of available info on Skripals Affair, “jeff the stryker” is a petty provocateur littering this forum.

    Jewish State and WMD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
    “Israel has not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)… There are speculations that a chemical weapons program might be located at the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR) in Ness Ziona. …

    Israel is not a signatory to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). The US Congress Office of Technology Assessment records Israel as a country possessing a long-term, undeclared biological warfare program.

    Israel has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), but supports establishment of a Middle East Zone free of weapons of mass destruction.”
    — The hypocrites through and through.

    List of targeted killings [assasinations] performed by Israel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Israeli_assassinations

    A sample of Israeli assassinations: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/04/mossad-carries-assassinations-180422152144736.html

    Mossad idiots: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/tourists-with-a-license-to-kill-a-look-at-the-mossad-s-assassination-squads-a-678805.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  170. Mulegino1 says:
    @Wally
    Good points.

    The demonization of the great Richard Wagner is a great example.

    Euro-gentiles cannot be allowed to have their heroes, tales of courage & strength unless Jews create them, control the message within them.

    Jews:
    the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral

    The debunked game is now out in the open, change is occurring.

    www.codoh.com

    Euro-gentiles cannot be allowed to have their heroes, tales of courage & strength unless Jews create them, control the message within them.

    And ergo, the sick and perverted tales of Hollywood, the lousy music oozing from the entertainment world and the dumb goy obsession with professional sports, particularly the NFL and NBA.

    Jewry, as a hive or collective hates peace, thrives upon chaos, moral corruption and economic misery. It directs its hatred toward the best of the goyim, whom its so called “Holy” Talmud directs the Jews to kill. It can only prosper when it plays parasite to a nation or culture in declining health, as vigorous and virile cultures are immunized to it- the naming of the international Jewry and being wise to its machinations is a sine qua non of the freedom, independence, sovereignty and prosperity of any people.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  171. Mulegino1 says:
    @phil
    The article at holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com says:

    'It is highly significant that among this enormous collection of secret German records, not a single one provides any evidence of mass killing, or even refers to a German wartime policy or program of “extermination.” To the contrary, many of these documents — such as those cited in this article — further demonstrate the seriousness of the efforts by high-level government and SS authorities to maintain the health of inmates by combating disease in the camps.'

    However, David Irving has been touting correspondence between Heinrich Himmler (head of the SS) and a German statistician that indicates that the number of Jews executed in the Reinhardt Camps of Eastern Poland was in the millions, not even counting the many thousands of Jews who were allegedly shot by mobile units that operated in Eastern Europe after the launch of Operation Barbarossa in 1941. He also refers to documents in which Himmler indicates a desire to conceal information about mass deaths from Hitler.

    Will the debate end up being between Irving, who lost a famous court case as a "denier," vs real denialists?

    See Irving's Youtube "The Life and Death of Heinrich Himmler." See also the document "Himmler Decodes" (British intercepts of Himmler's correspondence) at Irving's website.

    Five of the so called “Reinhardt” camps were simply transit camps, used for the relocation of Jews and others in German custody for purposes of resettlement and labor conscription. Majdanek/Lublin was a major SS administrative center located right at the edge and in full view of the City of Lublin.

    The most notorious of the Reinhardt camps was Treblinka II, a sub-camp for the Treblinka I labor camp. It is alleged that over 700,000 Jews were murdered using non-lethal diesel exhaust there, buried in gigantic mass graves. Never mind that mass graves containing 700,000 bodies would have to cover nearly 100 times the surface area of the mass graves at Katyn. Subsequently, the bodies were exhumed and cremated on outdoor cremation pyres which were set up on top of rail ties.

    There is absolutely no evidence that anything like this ever happened at Treblinka II. There are no signs of any mass graves or major excavations having occurred there. Aerial reconnaissance photos taken of the camp area shortly after the camp was closed show absolutely nothing. In other words, nothing happened at Treblinka II other than perhaps passengers de-training, being deloused and given a meal and continuing on their journey elsewhere.

    The Holohoax account of Treblinka II is an utter and absolute impossibility from a physical and logistical standpoint. The sick blood libel of European Christians carried out by international Jewry is collapsing under the weight of logic and empirical investigation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  172. Phil says:
    @Anon
    Citation?

    The Weizmann archives in Israel. Watch David Irving’s YouTube videos on Himmler and other subjects; he talks about including it for publication.

    Read More
    • Replies: @phil
    In Volume 2 of Churchill's Wars there is a chapter entitled "We Did It Before, and We Can Do It Again." The title reflects the success the Jews had in getting the US into World War I, and that they were confident that they could do an encore performance for World War II. Early on in the chapter there is an acknowledgement given to the Weizmann Archives; Irving relies on primary source documents. On Youtube Irving expresses amazement that he was given access to the archives.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  173. cassandra says:
    @lavoisier
    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    This site is a breath of fresh air from an opened window.

    Read More
    • Agree: geokat62, Druid
    • Replies: @Wally
    "Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?"

    Yes of course there are.
    CODOH, www.codoh.com and Inconvenient History, https://inconvenienthistory.com/ have incredibly brave writers

    But being a Jew, Ron probably gets more slack. For how long is the question.

    www.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  174. First, ‘we’ need to correctly define words:

    antisemitism [all Arabs, Muslims and Palestinians excluded!]

    Please continue…

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  175. anon[329] • Disclaimer says:
    @NoseytheDuke
    Some "nerve gas" that seemingly is only fatal in just 25% of cases and takes several days to kill. Military grade you say?

    Are you one of the experts on UR who says “military grade” and can explain what an expert means by it? Why wouldn’t the military have designed for it
    (a) a gas which disables quickly as its main intended effect
    (b) doesn’t kiĺl or permanently disable quickly to guard against accidents and allow antidotes to be administered and take effect?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  176. Art says:
    @Karl
    one or two murders PER CENTURY, do not a "ritual" make

    Every single "ritual" in the Jewish religion, is the subject of reams and reams and reams of open-source written discussion, presenting all possible discussions about "how to do it the kosher way"

    Anytime someone pegs the value of (e.g.) soybeans or winter-wheat wrong.... a clever someone-else can game that to make a buck

    i will find a way to make a buck off of RonUnz's incorrect "pricing"

    Anyone want to purchase indemnification in case of having your kid "ritually killed" by a Jew? i'll be happy to take your money

    Anyone want to purchase indemnification in case of having your kid “ritually killed” by a Jew? i’ll be happy to take your money

    Hmm — how about an indemnity about being economically killed by a Jew?

    Not selling any of those – are you!

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

    p.s. Talmudism is Zionist is Israel. Darkness can only beget darkness.

    p.s. America will overcome this darkness.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  177. @T. Weed
    This brave article by Unz brought it all back: in 1985 I wrote a letter to the editor of the Hoboken (NJ) Reporter criticizing Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. I became aware of Palestinians because when I was working as a TEFL teacher in the '70's in Saudi Arabia I met a couple of them who had been ethnically-cleansed. Before this, like most Americans, I believed the "land without people for a people without land" hoax. So in 1985 I wrote my first letter to a start-up weekly free paper, the Hoboken Reporter, and the letter did not go unnoticed. One writer bragged about his "jew pressure" and warned me to shut up. Well, I didn't. I wrote another letter, and another, and it was as if I had hit a hornet's nest. The "swarm", as Israel Shamir calls Jews who can be counted on to sting any truth-telling intruder, was all over me. The Reporter was also published in several other towns on the West Bank of the Hudson river, Jersey City, Union City, Weehawken, Secaucus, West New York, North Bergen, and my letters, and the replies to them, were published in all. I wrote under a pseudonym, T. Weed, but eventually I was found out and received several threatening phone calls. (I used the pseudonym because I was writing a book under my real name that was published by Random House and Bloomsbury Press, England, called Fool's Paradise--travels in Saudi Arabia) The letters went on and on, back and forth, for a decade, quite instructive and entertaining, and I collected and published them in a volume called Enough Rope, dedicated to the publisher, a Jew, who gave us all enough rope. He gave us enough rope because, as he admitted in an introduction to the book, the controversy "made" his paper, but he also, in a full page, defended my right to free speech, defended me against tremendous pressure in the form of letters from the Swarm to shut my mouth, these letters always claiming "we are all for free speech, but..."
    That decade of letters, Enough Rope, 1985-1995 still appeals to a new generation of readers. and is on an outdoor table at Symposia Books in Hoboken, $5.00, donated to the store.

    And available online for those not in or near NJ?

    Read More
    • Replies: @T. Weed
    No, Wizard, I never bothered to publicize it outside of Hoboken, or its sequel, the next decade of letters called More Rope, because the argument continued, not as heavy as before but there were still defenders of Israel (and other indefensible topics) willing to hang themselves. Now everybody in town knows who I am, because (along with a couple of other books of mine on the table), Fool's Paradise, the Arabia book, was shortlisted for the Pulitzer Prize and there's a big blown up letter in the window from Bloomsbury Press in London congratulating me.

    I'd be glad to send you a copy of Enough Rope, but you may not want to divulge your address. Better, actually, that you buy from the bookstore, for bookstores in Internet America struggle to make a living. Symposia books, 510 Washington St., Hoboken, NJ 07030. [email protected]

    Thanks for your inquiry. If you do read the letters, I hope you get a good laugh out of them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  178. Wally says:
    @Anonymous

    so, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains
     
    Have there been excavations at these sites?

    There have been some claimed and dishonest attempts to claim that millions of jew corpses have been found, but they found only button, combs and ordinary backyard stuff.
    In spite of not finding what’s alleged it hasn’t stopped from claiming the opposite. No surprise there. The entire matter pure bluff. The excuses they come up with are laughable.
    I recommend that you visit http://www.codoh.com for more, and visit their forum to ask questions and read the huge amount of debunking information that has been collected.

    Think about, real verifiable, witnessed, and displayed archaeology excavations would end Revisionism overnight. Yet we see nothing other lies.
    CODOH has tons on the absolutely fraudulent ‘holocaust archaelology’.

    ex.:
    The Big Excuse: ‘excavation & exhumation of Jews forbidden‘: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6817

    [MORE]

    Sites Where Excavations Are Physically Obstructed, Blocked: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9171
    just a few examples:
    Treblinka

    Belzec

    Sobibor Jew corpses claimed here, so why don’t they excavate, verify, & show the world? !!!

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10610

    sham archaeologist Caroline Sturdy-Colls caught lying.: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11121

    http://www.codoh.com
    debate here:

    http://forum.codoh.com

    Only Liars Want Censorship

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  179. @Anonymous
    @Ron Unz

    If you really want your mind blown, read Voluptuous Panic by Mel Gordon. It covers the Weimar Republic and how debauched they were. Everything from mother daughter prostitute teams, to a lot of gay sex, to pedo stuff too.

    It was so over the top I couldn't believe it. But at the same time we are starting to see the parallels here in America. Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry. I would like you to cover this sexual angle in a future article.

    Here is an interesting comment from the Amazon website:

    “There’s an apocryphal story about David Bowie meeting Christopher Isherwood, author of “Berlin Stories.” Bowie said something to the effect that it must have been exciting to be in Weimar Germany during the Roaring Twenties, what with the tycoons, transvestites, and spies all rubbing shoulders. At this point Isherwood felt compelled to let the relatively younger man know that he was a writer of fiction, and that the Weimar that fed his adventurous stories was very much fabricated.

    [MORE]

    The point of this anecdote is to highlight how elusive the reality of any bygone era is at a certain remove, and to further point out that Mel Gordon does the reader interested in the real history of Weimar a bit of a disservice by (by his own admission) ignoring anything that doesn’t serve his sensationalist agenda. “Eroticism” is a subjective term, and while I didn’t object to the S & M/ gender play content (or even the urolagnia/coprophagia), the sexualization of children glorified in the book (even if Gordon would deny this was his intent) was a bit much too stomach.

    Taken in the right spirit, as something in the same vein as Kenneth Anger’s “Hollywood Babylon,” which is to say a kind of salacious bit of tabloid-style light reading, the book really isn’t half bad. Some of the photos, flyers, and bits of artwork are essential Weimar memorabilia that help give the reader insight into Germany’s ill-fated experiment with democracy in the post-Wilhelmine era. But those of a more scholarly bent beware: there is a bibliography, but no sources, and when I attempted to find external corroboration of many of the assertions in the book, the only results I got online led me right back to this book. That’s a red flag right there. Tepid recommendation.”

    “Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry.” And yet, the churches and other groups (non-Jews) do very little about it. The RCC has been taken over by homos so you won’t hear condemnation of anything. The RCC is the biggest human-trafficking institution on the planet. It’s not the Jews. It’s the cucks. If Jews own the porn industry (which they don’t), why don’t they name the Jews? The Western cuck is incapable of doing anything. The cuck’s mind is so twisted by “universal church” and “universal brotherhood,” he can’t make a statement about anything. This “blame the Jews” schtick has to end. It is time to deal squarely with the problems in the West. The cucks are going to have be dragged kicking and screaming into the battle.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Sorry but the sexual deviance in Weimar Germany is well documented. There are other books that say the same thing. Your anecdote adding nothing.

    This "blame antisemitism" schtick is tiresome. According to Jews, Jews have never ever done anything wrong and if you point anything out you are an antisemite. There are others who participate in porn, but Jews absolutely rule this industry.
    , @Bill

    If Jews own the porn industry (which they don’t), why don’t they name the Jews? The Western cuck is incapable of doing anything. The cuck’s mind is so twisted by “universal church” and “universal brotherhood,” he can’t make a statement about anything. This “blame the Jews” schtick has to end. It is time to deal squarely with the problems in the West. The cucks are going to have be dragged kicking and screaming into the battle.
     
    The circularity in this "argument" is a wonder to behold. Westerners' failure to name the Jew is why they must not name the Jew.

    Just what would it look like for Westerners to de-cuckify and enter the battle? Well, every other ethnocentric, xenophobic, religious bigot has endless stories of how they are victimized by other groups and how any wrong act their group committed was merely understandable or even justified revenge for these victimizations. You might think that telling, hearing, and believing these stories serves some, you know, function in motivating collective action.
    , @Seraphim
    So you are an adept of coprophagia. No wonder, 'Shit eater' is an idiomatic expression for liar. No shit!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  180. Wally says:
    @cassandra

    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.
     
    This site is a breath of fresh air from an opened window.

    “Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?”

    Yes of course there are.
    CODOH, http://www.codoh.com and Inconvenient History, https://inconvenienthistory.com/ have incredibly brave writers

    But being a Jew, Ron probably gets more slack. For how long is the question.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @cassandra
    I mean intellectually honest: Unz presents evidence and sources pointing one way, then another, and then arbitrates only so far as reasonable. What separates this approach is that other articles tend to advocate for or against specific political positions. I prefer to learn facts first, and stave off taking sides to the very end, in a mostly futile effort to maintain objectivity.

    Thanks for the inconvenienthistory link. I've already bought the codoh library. I'm aware that there are many other brave writers, and didn't intend to diminish anyone else's courage.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  181. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Multiculturalism is a recipe for national suicide. Culture, including religious belief, is the unifying factor that allows strangers to work with one another, by ensuring that they share the same assumptions about morality and about correct behavior in general.

    Jews have been a problem for European societies for hundreds of years. The recent mass migration of people of multiple races and religions to Europe and its settler outposts in the America’s and the Pacific is creating cultural chaos.

    Immigrants who will not assimilate to the Christian culture of the West have no place in the West. For Africans, Asians, Hispanics and Middle-Easterners the message must be: assimilate or leave. The same for Jews who now, fortunately, have a place to go where they can live by the precepts of their ancient religion, however bizarre some of those precepts may seem to others.

    That then leaves only the problem of the Palestinians. A solution can surely be found in a deal with Egypt. The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants. The US could easily organize a purchase, funded by itself, Britain, the country primarily responsible for the dispossession of the Palestinians, the EU, Russia and some other countries, and of course Israel, which would have to pay for the land and houses of the departing Palestinians.

    At say $10,000 per hectare, a ridiculous price for a desert sand and rocky hillsides, the whole of Sinai could be purchased for $60 billion, a trivial amount in relation to the US trillion-dollar defense budget. In addition, there might be a need for something like half a trillion dollars for construction of the the cities and high-tech desert agricultural system of the new Palestinian state. But again, that is a rather trivial amount over, say ten years.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    Let wealthy Jews negotiate a price for Palestine with the Palestinian leadership. And let wealthy Jews pay for it.
    , @anon
    Sounds like a good plan. Or simply subsidize the Palestinians at $10,000 per head to relocate there. As there are 4.4 million Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza Strip combined, that should only cost $44 Billion, chump change compared to the $2.4 Trillion we've spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars since 2003. Leave the entire Mideast to Israel after that. If they can't make peace with anyone it's their wars to fight.

    Someone needs to go sell this "diversity is strength", "immigrants enrich their host country" propaganda to the Egyptians. Aren't Jews good at sales?
    , @renfro
    I see you are promoting the 'Zionist Jerusalem Summit' plan for transferring the Palestines out of Palestine.
    Since the Palestine's ancestors were the first and constant inhabitants of Palestine -going back 9000 years....it should be the Jews who are transferred out--don't you think.
    , @Druid
    If you're not an American Indian, the best suggestion is that YOU leave!
    , @Wizard of Oz
    Ridiculous. Your thinking is as outlandishly off the planet rational as mine. Actually I think I prefer your solution to my Taxpayer State single state solution and yours would be cheap at three times the price - which might be getting closer than your $60 billion to make it work (think of how much Egypt would calculate that it could extort. Think of the incentives to get the first million Palestinians to move. Fortunately a lot of Israeli research and development for the Negev would be a plus for Sinai).

    My Taxpayer State would put off Palestinian political control by reproductive superiority by 100 years or more by giving substantial additional political power - not least blocking power - to serious net taxpayers. It is just an old idea revived with modifications for this century.

    , @Skeptikal
    "The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants.":

    So, resettle the Jews there.
    Why shoujd the Pals leave their native land, their farms, their springs, their culture, their traditions, for a piece of unimproved desert?
    The Jews can take all of that of their own with them and turn the Sinai green.
    , @bjondo
    Relocate Yid back to Pale of Settlement (mentioned in article size of France and Spain) some 50 times size of current (but ever enlarging) Israel.

    The walls now used against Palestinians can be used to begin surrounding the PoS. Makes everyone happy except Yid who now has to live with Yid and leech off Yid. Total boycott and sanctions and isolation.

    Or

    give 'em an old aircraft carrier. Can continue wandering forever. And making up taller tales.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  182. iffen says:
    @AaronB
    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists - the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    German reader who thinks we shouldn't contact aliens because it would be dangerous? Daniel Chieh who thinks our problems are caused by some random genetic process and the solution is to colonize many planets and isolate them from each other so when the random POZ occurs it won't spread?

    Reiner Tor who has resigned himself to obsolescence because no solutions are obvious from within the materialist paradigm?

    Or utu with his old school anti-Semitism and complete inability to grasp metaphysics and his simplistic binary way of thinking where materialism is the underlying principle?

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story - and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.

    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists – the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    I will concede leftists do believe that they are proponents of the “next” phase of universalism and egalitarianism. I do not concede that Evangelical Christians do not see themselves as protagonists in an epic narrative.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    It is not clear what the long term consequences of the collapse of the traditional family among the peons will be. The upper class families seem to be doing okay.

    Cognizance of cultural rot would seem to tie many of the commenters together, even the ones with Jews on the brain disease.

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story – and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.
     
    Actually, it has recently occured to me that Christians were the Leftists of their time - proponents of "progress" - and the conservatives of their time were the Pagan restorationists. And Muslims were similarly the Leftists of their time and the Pagan Arabs were the conservatives.

    If this is true, then conservatives have never historically won ever, anywhere - and that "narratives" of moving towards some goal of perfection will always win.

    This means that to defeat the Left, you must flip the script and cast them in the mold of conservatives trying to hold back progress towards some goal of perfection, and that "conservatives" had better become the new Leftists! - come up with some new new goal of "progress".

    Only Leftists can defeat Leftists, only progressives can defeat progressives - conserving the old cannot win. Ideas of stability, homeostasis, and the like, cannot win.

    If older values are correct, as I believe they are in many cases, then we must learn to see them as steps on the path to some perfect goal, as exciting and sexy because standing for "true" progress.

    The "traditional" family - defeat is written in the words. Conjures up images of stability and safety but also boredom. Why not the family as the environment in which the task of self perfection - "progress" - can best take place. That is sexier and more exciting.

    But anyways my point is that many on Karlins blog seem to genuinely resent women qua women - and without some ideal for women, even if it involves different rights and duties than men, you again aren't going to win. Christianity had an ideal for women that was better than the Pagan one - which was focused on the physical.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.
     
    And there is no organized opposition because there is no Platonic Idea around which they can rally - while the Left has one. The Right seems to just be a headless chicken- all body, no head.
    , @peterAUS

    ....They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition...
     
    Then, perhaps, the question would be: why is there no opposition?
    I don't know, just feel, that digging out that truth could prove quite unpopular around here.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  183. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @T. Weed
    This brave article by Unz brought it all back: in 1985 I wrote a letter to the editor of the Hoboken (NJ) Reporter criticizing Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. I became aware of Palestinians because when I was working as a TEFL teacher in the '70's in Saudi Arabia I met a couple of them who had been ethnically-cleansed. Before this, like most Americans, I believed the "land without people for a people without land" hoax. So in 1985 I wrote my first letter to a start-up weekly free paper, the Hoboken Reporter, and the letter did not go unnoticed. One writer bragged about his "jew pressure" and warned me to shut up. Well, I didn't. I wrote another letter, and another, and it was as if I had hit a hornet's nest. The "swarm", as Israel Shamir calls Jews who can be counted on to sting any truth-telling intruder, was all over me. The Reporter was also published in several other towns on the West Bank of the Hudson river, Jersey City, Union City, Weehawken, Secaucus, West New York, North Bergen, and my letters, and the replies to them, were published in all. I wrote under a pseudonym, T. Weed, but eventually I was found out and received several threatening phone calls. (I used the pseudonym because I was writing a book under my real name that was published by Random House and Bloomsbury Press, England, called Fool's Paradise--travels in Saudi Arabia) The letters went on and on, back and forth, for a decade, quite instructive and entertaining, and I collected and published them in a volume called Enough Rope, dedicated to the publisher, a Jew, who gave us all enough rope. He gave us enough rope because, as he admitted in an introduction to the book, the controversy "made" his paper, but he also, in a full page, defended my right to free speech, defended me against tremendous pressure in the form of letters from the Swarm to shut my mouth, these letters always claiming "we are all for free speech, but..."
    That decade of letters, Enough Rope, 1985-1995 still appeals to a new generation of readers. and is on an outdoor table at Symposia Books in Hoboken, $5.00, donated to the store.

    Good for you!!!

    Read More
    • Replies: @T. Weed
    Thank you, Anon.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  184. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @nagra
    [It would be much better if you made greater effort to follow proper capitalization, spelling, spacing, and punctuation, especially if you're leaving such a large number of comments.]

    there was also war in 1948
    five Arab counties attacked
    a from the every single side
    they've lost such enterprise

    you loose war you loose territory
    that is really how the war works

    sometimes for strategic reasons
    get mature and simple get a real

    We’ve all heard the arguments that Arabs moved in to work for Jews back in 1900 to 1940. We’ve all heard the argument that to the victor belongs the land We’ve all heard the arguments that the Arabs left during the battles and therefore the Jews had the God given right to take over their real estate, homes, businesses farms and other property.

    Those are nursery school level Zionist arguments. We’re all Stanford Harvard PhD & professor level anti Zionists.

    Your arguments would go over in a Jewish private school Kindergarten, or a Hadassah luncheon but not here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    so you might explain me what language your 'Palestinians' speak and what literature and culture they rely on in all your arguments
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  185. Anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:
    @Verymuchalive

    But we should keep in mind that a Jewish plotter had been implicated in the killing of Czar Alexander II, and Jewish assassins had also struck down several top Russian ministers and numerous other government officials.
     
    In the article you published by Anatoly Karlin " The Russian Empire: Too Nice for Its Own Good " ( September 26 2017 ), Mr K writes, "What Communist propagandists don't like to mention as much is that just during the three years1904-1907 some 4,500 Tsarist officials were murdered by what would today be classified as Far Left terrorist groups."

    It would be interesting to discover what percentage of those convicted of the murders were of Jewish origin.

    The Czar’s assassins left the following written on the wall at the scene of the murders.

    “Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht / Von seinen Knechten umgebracht,” “Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves.”

    Belshazzar, the Gentile king of Babylon who, in the Old Testament story, saw ‘the writing on the wall’ foretelling his destruction (Daniel 5) and was killed as punishment for his offences against Israel’s God. In a clever play on the Heine quotation, the unknown writer, almost certainly one of the killers, has substituted Belsatzar for Heine’s spelling Belsazar in order to signal even more clearly his intended symbolism. The Heine inscription described the racial / ethnic nature of the murders: ‘A Gentile king had just been killed as an act of Jewish retribution.’

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    The Czar’s assassins left the following written on the wall at the scene of the murders.

    “Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht / Von seinen Knechten umgebracht,” “Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves.”
     
    Citation?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  186. unseated says:
    @nagra
    MarkTwain was in the area in his time
    it was a pretty empty according to him

    then Jews came and they've opened it economically and land worth something
    which than attracted Arabs to move in pretending to be palestinians nowadays

    Palestine in 1948:

    “Making the desert bloom – a myth examined ” by Alan George.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  187. Citizen24 says:

    Many thanks to Ron Unz for this website and its many insightful articles, please continue!

    Read More
    • Agree: mark green
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  188. Bill Jones says: • Website

    It is of course not anti-semitism. It is counter-semitism.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  189. @Wally
    No to mention getting physically assaulted, fire bombed. etc.

    recommended:
    French Scholar Who Questioned ‘Gas Chamber’ Claims Recants after Three-Year Campaign of Intimidation and Violence : https://codoh.com/library/document/2421/?lang=en

    Revisionist Historian Suffers Savage Beating * : https://codoh.com/library/document/300/?lang=en

    Revisionist Zündel's Office-Home Damaged in Fire Bomb / Arson Attack, Zionist Group Claims Responsibility : https://codoh.com/library/document/2598/?lang=en

    * https://codoh.com/media/files/Faurisson16.09.1989-700x1043.jpg

    ‘…No to mention getting physically assaulted, fire bombed. etc…’

    Point taken. However, there is a specific narrative here that calls the guardians of orthodoxy to arms: ancient Israel — the Holocaust — modern Israel-the need to uncritically support Israel. It’s not so much anti-semites in general who become the focus of attack, but those who question the specific narrative culminating in ‘our only ally and the the only democracy in the Middle East.’

    You can assert the most extravagant things about the Protocols. No one will care. But dare to suggest that Israeli ‘archeology’ has an agenda, and you’re for it.

    It has struck me. It isn’t ‘antisemitism’ that is the issue — it’s not viewed with favor, but no one really cares. It’s anything that leads to a critical view of Israel that is targeted. When people object to ‘anti-semitism,’ nine times out of ten, it’s ‘anti-Israelism’ they’re objecting to. Interfere in that narrative, and you’d better have tenure.

    Read More
    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Anon

    But dare to suggest that Israeli ‘archeology’ has an agenda, and you’re for it.
     
    What is the agenda of Israeli archeology?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  190. Anon[425] • Disclaimer says:
    @utu
    OMG, RU compared Jews to uranium.

    Oppenheimer was Jewish. A great scientist.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  191. anastasia says:

    Mr. Unz thinks alot about unthinkable things.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  192. ValmMond says:

    The submission of American politicians to zionist interests is not just complete and consummated but also source of much entertainment and mockery for their abusive overlords. Look at this hapless, obsequious, altright Alabama wretch. After being thoroughly humiliated by the putative israeli interviewer, Moore walks out, stating that he’s still a “supporter of Israel”.

    They’d rather be falsely accused of pedophilia than be suspected of lacking loyalty for their racist, parasitic masters.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  193. anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m afraid we may be too deep into the Jewish Problem now to avoid a terrible calamity.

    The Israelis were involved with 9/11 and they have distorted the facts of WW2 and the Holocaust in such a way that the public simply can’t find out the truth. I suspect most at the top levels of government understand the reality, but there is nothing that can be done.

    The internet allows for the most obscure information to spread rapidly, and people are eventually going to find out the colossal scam that has been pulled, and they are going to be very unhappy. Learning some of this information literally put me in a depression. It will put many others in a rage.

    There are huge problems brewing and I’m sure the Israelis are aware of this and they’ve planned accordingly. I have a bad feeling the age old Jewish Question might be coming to a head soon.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon

    Learning some of this information literally put me in a depression.
     
    What specifically were some of the things that had an impact on you?
    , @Wade
    I agree. I worry that one of the things they will do to us is attempt to impoverish us. They are already slowly succeeding at that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  194. @Heros

    "One thing that has struck me since I have started visiting this site is how commonly anti-semitic attitudes and theories are voiced at it.

    Or rather, I am struck by not how often they are voiced, but by the apparently lack of outrage and concern about it among those who profess to care about and police such matters. Perceive a gigantic Jewish conspiracy? Have at it."
     

    Get a grip on in Colin! Week after week, Ron Unz has been chronicling jewish perfidity and coverups of centuries of crimes against humanity. At least on unz.com, if you don't agree with Ron's analysis you had a loads of chances to debate it there. Instead, like all the other arrogant jews, you start your entire comment kvetching and flinging spittle with the same old "anti-semite" canard. Give us a break for crying out loud.

    There is no more discussion, except among you jewish racist supremacists who are accessories to the murder of children, of if anti-semitism is a chicken/egg dilemma. Anti-semitism is a reaction to jewish lies and crimes. Here at Unz, with this article, it has been laid to rest.

    When you immediately start your post with this standard centuries old jewish canard, we know that you are just being duplicitous.

    However, now that we do know that the roots of anti-semitism are a reaction to jewish crimes, jewish lies, and jewish ritual sacrifices, it is time to turn our attention back to 1933. That is the year that the "anti-semite" Hitler got elected. To quote Benjamin Freedman:


    "Before Hitler had touched the hair of a single jew, Judea declared war on Germany"
     
    .
    http://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/judea_declares_war_on_germany.jpg

    Jews deliberately started WWII using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    If we go further back to WWI, with the prolonging of the war until Balfour was signed and the Jews brought America into the war, it is clear that jews started this war too, using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    So if we look back over the last 100 years, or even all the way back to the French revolution, what we see is hundreds of pointless wars between Christian countries, that were started using the same kind of lies and tricks that they use to deliberately create the resentment they call "anti-semitism".

    When I look at the score card here, I see in the White European column tens upon tens upon tens of millions of dead fighting wars for lying jews. In the jew column I see 6 million, listed about 33 times starting about 1880. All of them fake. All of them projected back onto the goyim.

    What a race of swine.

    Lol. Poor Colin…

    To put it mildly, you’re missing the target.

    ‘…Get a grip on in Colin! Week after week, Ron Unz has been chronicling jewish perfidity and coverups of centuries of crimes against humanity. At least on
    und.com, if you don’t agree with Ron’s analysis you had a loads of chances to debate it there. Instead, like all the other arrogant jews, you start your entire comment kvetching and flinging spittle with the same old “anti-semite” canard. Give us a break for crying out loud.

    There is no more discussion, except among you jewish racist supremacist…

    You can’t win. I’ve been banned for ‘antisemitism.’ Youall are going to have to make up your mind: am I an ‘anti-semite’ or a ‘Jewish racial supremacist’? It seems improbable I could be both.

    Anyway, thanks. You’ve given me some amusing lines to quote. Colin Wright: Jewish racist supremacist.

    You can’t win.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  195. ohmy says:

    Today I read an article published by VT which mentioned that in Russia there has been a call for investigation(s) into the Bolshevik’s involvement in the 1918 murder of Czar Nicholas, and his entire family. Also, the investigation will attempt to determine if there are any connections, links, or similarities between the Romanov killings and, earlier assassinations of Russian leaders which seem to happen every 100 years (cough cough, psst, it’s 2018). I can hear the anti-Semitism cries building. If the Russian inquiry doesn’t get shut down it may just be very interesting.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  196. @Hippopotamusdrome
    Dreyfus affair was a fake incedent or hoax designed to create a public anti-semitism controversy.

    For a description of the Dreyfus Affair as a Psy-OP (a fake incident) to engineer public opinion leading to the First Zionist Congress of Basel one year later see

    http://mileswmathis.com/dreyfus.pdf

    Journalists, like Herzl and Zola are what is now called Presstitutes.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  197. phil says:
    @nagra
    US was mostly a watcher in both wars you have mentioned
    both the US and the UK charged even for boot laces in gold

    If the US didn’t matter, the Jews would not have been so eager to get it involved in both wars.

    The D-Day invasion on June 6, 1944 was not a small operation.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  198. phil says:

    Volume 2 of Churchill’s War, by David Irving, has a chapter entitled “We Did It Before and We Can Do It Again.” The chapter refers to the role played by Jews in getting the US involved in World War I, and the Jews’ confidence that they could do an encore performance for World War II. There is an acknowledgement given early in the chapter to the Weizmann archives. On Youtube Irving expresses amazement that he was allowed to access them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  199. Bill Jones says: • Website

    Longhand was right. Cromwell was wrong.
    Keep the tickets out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  200. AaronB says:
    @iffen
    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists – the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    I will concede leftists do believe that they are proponents of the “next” phase of universalism and egalitarianism. I do not concede that Evangelical Christians do not see themselves as protagonists in an epic narrative.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    It is not clear what the long term consequences of the collapse of the traditional family among the peons will be. The upper class families seem to be doing okay.

    Cognizance of cultural rot would seem to tie many of the commenters together, even the ones with Jews on the brain disease.

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story – and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.

    Actually, it has recently occured to me that Christians were the Leftists of their time – proponents of “progress” – and the conservatives of their time were the Pagan restorationists. And Muslims were similarly the Leftists of their time and the Pagan Arabs were the conservatives.

    If this is true, then conservatives have never historically won ever, anywhere – and that “narratives” of moving towards some goal of perfection will always win.

    This means that to defeat the Left, you must flip the script and cast them in the mold of conservatives trying to hold back progress towards some goal of perfection, and that “conservatives” had better become the new Leftists! – come up with some new new goal of “progress”.

    Only Leftists can defeat Leftists, only progressives can defeat progressives – conserving the old cannot win. Ideas of stability, homeostasis, and the like, cannot win.

    If older values are correct, as I believe they are in many cases, then we must learn to see them as steps on the path to some perfect goal, as exciting and sexy because standing for “true” progress.

    The “traditional” family – defeat is written in the words. Conjures up images of stability and safety but also boredom. Why not the family as the environment in which the task of self perfection – “progress” – can best take place. That is sexier and more exciting.

    But anyways my point is that many on Karlins blog seem to genuinely resent women qua women – and without some ideal for women, even if it involves different rights and duties than men, you again aren’t going to win. Christianity had an ideal for women that was better than the Pagan one – which was focused on the physical.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.

    And there is no organized opposition because there is no Platonic Idea around which they can rally – while the Left has one. The Right seems to just be a headless chicken- all body, no head.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS

    Only Leftists can defeat Leftists, only progressives can defeat progressives – conserving the old cannot win. Ideas of stability, homeostasis, and the like, cannot win.
     
    You sure?

    Don't know.

    Franco, for example.
    Then, more recently, Nationalists winning over Communists in Eastern Europe after the fall of The Wall. We could agree, I guess, that Nationalism is a bit older than Communism.

    And there is no organized opposition because there is no Platonic Idea around which they can rally – while the Left has one. The Right seems to just be a headless chicken- all body, no head.
     
    In the West.

    In the East...not so sure about that.

    Do a (mental) test: imagine that US (military) power can't get delivered in Balkans anymore.
    Or Russian (military) power can't get delivered in Donbass. Or some other places.

    Watch........
    , @iffen
    – and that “narratives” of moving towards some goal of perfection will always win.


    The narrative of restoring what was great in the past works pretty well at times.

    But anyways my point is that many on Karlins blog seem to genuinely resent women qua women – and without some ideal for women, even if it involves different rights and duties than men, you again aren’t going to win.


    Yes, I agree. There is a lack of vision.
    , @Wizard of Oz
    I like your contribution. Let me add the thought that the Christians of the first century might not have had much in common with the winners of three and more centuries later. And of course Shia and Sunni were split from early on.

    Moreover the pagan conservatives had a pretty good run for the few hundred years of progressive Christian activism and struggle. Did the Romans use CIA or Comintern sophistication to prolong Christian divisions one wonders.

    , @Buster Keaton’s Stunt Double

    But anyways my point is that many on Karlins blog seem to genuinely resent women qua women – and without some ideal for women, even if it involves different rights and duties than men, you again aren’t going to win.
     
    To not resent women for their behaviour en mass over the past hundred years (well, longer, really, but definitely kicking into high gear over the course of the 20th century and into the present) would, I think, demand that the intellectually-consistent man adopt the position that women are rather like large children, and thus do not possess true agency or responsibility for their actions.

    I think you’re doing those commenters an additional disservice as well in suggesting that they have no “ideal for women” in mind; I suspect most do, even if it goes unmentioned.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  201. peterAUS says:
    @iffen
    Sure, but the only Whites who believe themselves to be the protagonists of an epic narrative are Leftists – the true continuators of Christianity, in a corrupted form.

    I will concede leftists do believe that they are proponents of the “next” phase of universalism and egalitarianism. I do not concede that Evangelical Christians do not see themselves as protagonists in an epic narrative.

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.

    And all the guys there who are bitter and resentful of women as such without the ability to see the problem as part of the cultural rot?

    It is not clear what the long term consequences of the collapse of the traditional family among the peons will be. The upper class families seem to be doing okay.

    Cognizance of cultural rot would seem to tie many of the commenters together, even the ones with Jews on the brain disease.

    Your choices at the moment are Leftists and Jews who see themselves as heros in an epic story – and headless chickens, time servers, and time wasters.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.

    ….They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition…

    Then, perhaps, the question would be: why is there no opposition?
    I don’t know, just feel, that digging out that truth could prove quite unpopular around here.

    Read More
    • Replies: @iffen
    Then, perhaps, the question would be: why is there no opposition?

    A serious error on my part. I should have said there is no organized opposition.

    Many commenters here consider themselves in opposition, but few belong to any organized opposition.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  202. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB

    Do u think the guys at Karlins blog for instance have any chance of winning against that?

    No, they (we) don’t. But remember that group dynamics can change quickly. Christians went from a few hundred to millions in about four hundred years and dominated the Western world for several hundred years and still sling a mean hammer at times.
     
    Actually, it has recently occured to me that Christians were the Leftists of their time - proponents of "progress" - and the conservatives of their time were the Pagan restorationists. And Muslims were similarly the Leftists of their time and the Pagan Arabs were the conservatives.

    If this is true, then conservatives have never historically won ever, anywhere - and that "narratives" of moving towards some goal of perfection will always win.

    This means that to defeat the Left, you must flip the script and cast them in the mold of conservatives trying to hold back progress towards some goal of perfection, and that "conservatives" had better become the new Leftists! - come up with some new new goal of "progress".

    Only Leftists can defeat Leftists, only progressives can defeat progressives - conserving the old cannot win. Ideas of stability, homeostasis, and the like, cannot win.

    If older values are correct, as I believe they are in many cases, then we must learn to see them as steps on the path to some perfect goal, as exciting and sexy because standing for "true" progress.

    The "traditional" family - defeat is written in the words. Conjures up images of stability and safety but also boredom. Why not the family as the environment in which the task of self perfection - "progress" - can best take place. That is sexier and more exciting.

    But anyways my point is that many on Karlins blog seem to genuinely resent women qua women - and without some ideal for women, even if it involves different rights and duties than men, you again aren't going to win. Christianity had an ideal for women that was better than the Pagan one - which was focused on the physical.

    They are winning by default as there is no organized opposition.
     
    And there is no organized opposition because there is no Platonic Idea around which they can rally - while the Left has one. The Right seems to just be a headless chicken- all body, no head.

    Only Leftists can defeat Leftists, only progressives can defeat progressives – conserving the old cannot win. Ideas of stability, homeostasis, and the like, cannot win.

    You sure?

    Don’t know.

    Franco, for example.
    Then, more recently, Nationalists winning over Communists in Eastern Europe after the fall of The Wall. We could agree, I guess, that Nationalism is a bit older than Communism.

    And there is no organized opposition because there is no Platonic Idea around which they can rally – while the Left has one. The Right seems to just be a headless chicken- all body, no head.

    In the West.

    In the East…not so sure about that.

    Do a (mental) test: imagine that US (military) power can’t get delivered in Balkans anymore.
    Or Russian (military) power can’t get delivered in Donbass. Or some other places.

    Watch……..

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    That's a good point about nationalism - but I think what we are seeing in places like Russia and Poland is a resurgence of religious nationalism - pure nationalism, without a Platonic Idea, just materialism, seems to have no long term success anywhere. I don't think the attempt to revive it among materialist western right wingers will work. I think they fundamentally misunderstand this.

    In the context of a failed Communism, religious nationalism appears as progressive - as an exciting step in the direction of progress towards a higher state.

    Its not that old traditional ideas can't be revived - its that I think conservatives basically misunderstand traditional ideas. In their time, traditional ideas were meant to facilitate the self-perfection of man - not provide stability, safety, or homeostasis. Christianity was a program for the perfection of man - not social stability.

    Traditional ideas were based on a Platonic Idea - never materialism. The attempt to revive traditional ideas on a materialist basis, because they provide stability, seems a misunderstanding. In fact, traditional ideas provide stability because they were accepted as part of the plan of self-perfection. That's why they secured consent - i.e became the basis of a stable society. People accept a social organization that they believe will assist in self-perfection, and that is the source of social stability.

    As for military power projection, once local power balances alter its hard to predict what will come to seem "progressive". And short term social expedients taken in chaotic cobditions don't necessarily translate into long term social organization.

    That's my take, at any rate.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  203. ohmy says:
    @Anon
    Still reading.... On the fly "Coningsby" not "Conigsby" (btw have you got any Hitler or other Nazi references to it?)

    I sought, by Googling, to see if Em Prof Albert S. Lindemann was/is, as I thought till I looked up "Walter Lindemann, Lord Cherwell" and found what Wiki says about the great Frederick (sic) Lindemann, Jewish. I still don't know as the Wikipedia entry is somehow mysteriously "archived". Is this a known condition? I don't suppose Albert S. is Jewish.... Pity.

    Anon 208 asks; ” I still don’t know as the Wikipedia entry is somehow mysteriously “archived”. Is this a known condition?
    Anon 208, who do you think is the editor in-chief of Wikipedia, and also Wikileaks?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Please elaborate. I assume you refer to a Jew being editor-in-chief of Wikipedia and therefore presumptively in favour of Jews doing the editing but your reference to Wikileaks completely throws me. After all Julian Assange is no special friend of Israel or Jews.

    Anyway,, what can you tell me about the "archiving"?

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  204. nagra says:
    @Anon
    We’ve all heard the arguments that Arabs moved in to work for Jews back in 1900 to 1940. We’ve all heard the argument that to the victor belongs the land We’ve all heard the arguments that the Arabs left during the battles and therefore the Jews had the God given right to take over their real estate, homes, businesses farms and other property.

    Those are nursery school level Zionist arguments. We’re all Stanford Harvard PhD & professor level anti Zionists.

    Your arguments would go over in a Jewish private school Kindergarten, or a Hadassah luncheon but not here.

    so you might explain me what language your ‘Palestinians’ speak and what literature and culture they rely on in all your arguments

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  205. ohmy says:

    It’s been years since I searched the internet for news print references prior to 1930 of 6 million Jews dead or dying. I was amazed when I discovered over 25 newspaper articles, some from as early as the 1890′s, either proclaiming, or predicting 6 million Jews are in danger of dying, or starving in Eastern Europe or Russia. Many of the articles asked for donations. Check it out yourself. It has been a scam for 130 years.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    said:
    " I was amazed when I discovered over 25 newspaper articles, some from as early as the 1890′s, either proclaiming, or predicting 6 million Jews are in danger of dying, or starving in Eastern Europe or Russia. "

    Here you go, Jews have been pushing their '6,000,000' lie since at least 1823:
    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF
    and:
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php
    http://balder.org/judea/billeder-judea/Scan-New-York-Times-Six-Million-Since-1869-Composite.jpg

    www.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  206. Thomm says:

    This is interesting. On ‘What would you do?’, a group of actors assumes their roles. A white girl has a Jewish boyfriend, and her parents disapprove. The show tries to draw out some White Trashionalists from the patronage, but to no avail, since normal Americans are not like that :

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=RGeTDN4knlM

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  207. Ace says:
    @Lot
    "cries of “anti-Semite” soon appeared, and according to Google there are now over 180,000 such hits combining her name and that harsh accusatory term. "

    There are also 186,000 Google results combining her name with the word "ducks."

    What does that prove?

    Answer: That your search terms need to be revised.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  208. phil says:
    @nagra
    US was mostly a watcher in both wars you have mentioned
    both the US and the UK charged even for boot laces in gold

    The Jews think otherwise, and on average they are not dumb.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  209. renfro says:
    @T. Weed
    This brave article by Unz brought it all back: in 1985 I wrote a letter to the editor of the Hoboken (NJ) Reporter criticizing Israel for its treatment of Palestinians. I became aware of Palestinians because when I was working as a TEFL teacher in the '70's in Saudi Arabia I met a couple of them who had been ethnically-cleansed. Before this, like most Americans, I believed the "land without people for a people without land" hoax. So in 1985 I wrote my first letter to a start-up weekly free paper, the Hoboken Reporter, and the letter did not go unnoticed. One writer bragged about his "jew pressure" and warned me to shut up. Well, I didn't. I wrote another letter, and another, and it was as if I had hit a hornet's nest. The "swarm", as Israel Shamir calls Jews who can be counted on to sting any truth-telling intruder, was all over me. The Reporter was also published in several other towns on the West Bank of the Hudson river, Jersey City, Union City, Weehawken, Secaucus, West New York, North Bergen, and my letters, and the replies to them, were published in all. I wrote under a pseudonym, T. Weed, but eventually I was found out and received several threatening phone calls. (I used the pseudonym because I was writing a book under my real name that was published by Random House and Bloomsbury Press, England, called Fool's Paradise--travels in Saudi Arabia) The letters went on and on, back and forth, for a decade, quite instructive and entertaining, and I collected and published them in a volume called Enough Rope, dedicated to the publisher, a Jew, who gave us all enough rope. He gave us enough rope because, as he admitted in an introduction to the book, the controversy "made" his paper, but he also, in a full page, defended my right to free speech, defended me against tremendous pressure in the form of letters from the Swarm to shut my mouth, these letters always claiming "we are all for free speech, but..."
    That decade of letters, Enough Rope, 1985-1995 still appeals to a new generation of readers. and is on an outdoor table at Symposia Books in Hoboken, $5.00, donated to the store.

    Bravo……good for you.

    Read More
    • Replies: @T. Weed
    Thanks, renfro.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  210. T. Weed says:
    @Wizard of Oz
    And available online for those not in or near NJ?

    No, Wizard, I never bothered to publicize it outside of Hoboken, or its sequel, the next decade of letters called More Rope, because the argument continued, not as heavy as before but there were still defenders of Israel (and other indefensible topics) willing to hang themselves. Now everybody in town knows who I am, because (along with a couple of other books of mine on the table), Fool’s Paradise, the Arabia book, was shortlisted for the Pulitzer Prize and there’s a big blown up letter in the window from Bloomsbury Press in London congratulating me.

    I’d be glad to send you a copy of Enough Rope, but you may not want to divulge your address. Better, actually, that you buy from the bookstore, for bookstores in Internet America struggle to make a living. Symposia books, 510 Washington St., Hoboken, NJ 07030. [email protected].

    Thanks for your inquiry. If you do read the letters, I hope you get a good laugh out of them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  211. AaronB says:
    @peterAUS

    Only Leftists can defeat Leftists, only progressives can defeat progressives – conserving the old cannot win. Ideas of stability, homeostasis, and the like, cannot win.
     
    You sure?

    Don't know.

    Franco, for example.
    Then, more recently, Nationalists winning over Communists in Eastern Europe after the fall of The Wall. We could agree, I guess, that Nationalism is a bit older than Communism.

    And there is no organized opposition because there is no Platonic Idea around which they can rally – while the Left has one. The Right seems to just be a headless chicken- all body, no head.
     
    In the West.

    In the East...not so sure about that.

    Do a (mental) test: imagine that US (military) power can't get delivered in Balkans anymore.
    Or Russian (military) power can't get delivered in Donbass. Or some other places.

    Watch........

    That’s a good point about nationalism – but I think what we are seeing in places like Russia and Poland is a resurgence of religious nationalism – pure nationalism, without a Platonic Idea, just materialism, seems to have no long term success anywhere. I don’t think the attempt to revive it among materialist western right wingers will work. I think they fundamentally misunderstand this.

    In the context of a failed Communism, religious nationalism appears as progressive – as an exciting step in the direction of progress towards a higher state.

    Its not that old traditional ideas can’t be revived – its that I think conservatives basically misunderstand traditional ideas. In their time, traditional ideas were meant to facilitate the self-perfection of man – not provide stability, safety, or homeostasis. Christianity was a program for the perfection of man – not social stability.

    Traditional ideas were based on a Platonic Idea – never materialism. The attempt to revive traditional ideas on a materialist basis, because they provide stability, seems a misunderstanding. In fact, traditional ideas provide stability because they were accepted as part of the plan of self-perfection. That’s why they secured consent – i.e became the basis of a stable society. People accept a social organization that they believe will assist in self-perfection, and that is the source of social stability.

    As for military power projection, once local power balances alter its hard to predict what will come to seem “progressive”. And short term social expedients taken in chaotic cobditions don’t necessarily translate into long term social organization.

    That’s my take, at any rate.

    Read More
    • Replies: @peterAUS
    A thoughtful post.

    ....traditional ideas were meant to facilitate the self-perfection of man – not provide stability, safety, or homeostasis. Christianity was a program for the perfection of man – not social stability.

     


    .....traditional ideas provide stability because they were accepted as part of the plan of self-perfection.
     
    I am not quite sure I get this.
    Feels as a deep topic. Not well versed in that I am afraid.

    A couple of things: the concept of "self-perfection" in, say, traditional Catholic/Orthodox Christianity, with accepting that a man is a sinner and only though Jesus he/she can find salvation.
    Then, I can get that top thinkers of those nations maybe thought along those lines; common folk, though, based their nationalism on simple living with people who shared the same values in life. Sometimes even just the same customs. The sense of belonging. The perception of "us" and "them" as the bottom line.

    You want a problem to ponder about?
    Here it is, then:
    Why such ..animosity..... then, between Catholics and Orthodox in Balkans and Ukraine? The same, now dormant, between Protestant and Catholics in N.I.?

    I guess that your approach to nationalism is, say, what.....metaphysical?
    Mine is way, way below. Just blood and soil, in that order. "Us" vs "them".

    West is doomed re nationalism. Maybe. Not quite sure.
    All those wars of Catholics vs Protestants..............and we are talking about people of the same race.
    Now, that "we" vs "them" is much more visible.

    ....short term social expedients taken in chaotic cobditions don’t necessarily translate into long term social organization.

     

    Agree.
    Again, so what? If it works during my lifetime fine (say, if I were a young man). After me, their problem. Something like that.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  212. T. Weed says:
    @Anon
    Good for you!!!

    Thank you, Anon.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  213. T. Weed says:
    @renfro
    Bravo......good for you.

    Thanks, renfro.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  214. @nagra
    [It would be much better if you made greater effort to follow proper capitalization, spelling, spacing, and punctuation, especially if you're leaving such a large number of comments.]

    there was also war in 1948
    five Arab counties attacked
    a from the every single side
    they've lost such enterprise

    you loose war you loose territory
    that is really how the war works

    sometimes for strategic reasons
    get mature and simple get a real

    Why, what big teeth you have grandma.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  215. phil says:
    @Phil
    The Weizmann archives in Israel. Watch David Irving’s YouTube videos on Himmler and other subjects; he talks about including it for publication.

    In Volume 2 of Churchill’s Wars there is a chapter entitled “We Did It Before, and We Can Do It Again.” The title reflects the success the Jews had in getting the US into World War I, and that they were confident that they could do an encore performance for World War II. Early on in the chapter there is an acknowledgement given to the Weizmann Archives; Irving relies on primary source documents. On Youtube Irving expresses amazement that he was given access to the archives.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  216. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @iffen
    Most leftists:

    Each successful Jew has attained his position because of that particular individual's agency.

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.

    Do blacks, women, browns, etc. have agency?

    Blacks, women, browns, etc. are denied success as individuals because whites unfairly deny success to members of the group based on group sterotypes rather than utilizing and accepting characteristics of the individual.

    And who are these “whites” who unfairly deny their success, are they whites or are they (((whites)))? The institutions that are the most discriminatory towards women and minorities are Hollywood, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, management consulting, law firms, upper echelons of academia, media, businesses…all are dominated by (((whites))).

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  217. @cassandra

    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.
     
    The Declaration was finally made not to Weizmann but Rothschild. Curious, that.

    That Rothschild was the head of the British Zionist organization in Britain. To who should the Declaration have been addressed? Weizmann was not British. Have you considered informing yourself?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  218. Anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @CanSpeccy
    Multiculturalism is a recipe for national suicide. Culture, including religious belief, is the unifying factor that allows strangers to work with one another, by ensuring that they share the same assumptions about morality and about correct behavior in general.

    Jews have been a problem for European societies for hundreds of years. The recent mass migration of people of multiple races and religions to Europe and its settler outposts in the America's and the Pacific is creating cultural chaos.

    Immigrants who will not assimilate to the Christian culture of the West have no place in the West. For Africans, Asians, Hispanics and Middle-Easterners the message must be: assimilate or leave. The same for Jews who now, fortunately, have a place to go where they can live by the precepts of their ancient religion, however bizarre some of those precepts may seem to others.

    That then leaves only the problem of the Palestinians. A solution can surely be found in a deal with Egypt. The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants. The US could easily organize a purchase, funded by itself, Britain, the country primarily responsible for the dispossession of the Palestinians, the EU, Russia and some other countries, and of course Israel, which would have to pay for the land and houses of the departing Palestinians.

    At say $10,000 per hectare, a ridiculous price for a desert sand and rocky hillsides, the whole of Sinai could be purchased for $60 billion, a trivial amount in relation to the US trillion-dollar defense budget. In addition, there might be a need for something like half a trillion dollars for construction of the the cities and high-tech desert agricultural system of the new Palestinian state. But again, that is a rather trivial amount over, say ten years.

    Let wealthy Jews negotiate a price for Palestine with the Palestinian leadership. And let wealthy Jews pay for it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Heros
    Jews don't pay retail. Just ask a Palestinian.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  219. escobar says:

    Jew Derangement Syndrome?

    The Kushners and gang from Goldman Sachs embody the American dream: amassing wealth. In a culture where nothing matters as much, Jews rose to great power. They could not have done it had the Sermon on the Mount had as many readers as “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?” had watchers. The peddler in the old shtetl got the chance in America to run a private equity firm and amass assets of $12 billion. As that swell fellow Larry Summers said “We’re the insiders now.” They played the American game and the few fielded the strongest team. The Asian-Americans will challenge.
    We are a market democracy, not a people’s democracy.
    “The world is not run by justice and morality, but by power and money, and money buys power.”
    Stevenson warned us in 1956, Ike in 1961, Carter in 1980. Eh.

    Read More
    • Replies: @anon

    The Asian-Americans will challenge.
     
    The Jews are carefully grooming East Indians to take over as puppet CEOs, college deans, bureaucrats, judges, prosecutors etc. They make for the perfect puppets as they worship whites, are mostly English speaking, loquacious as the Jews, smarter than blacks but have dark skin, and aren't as big of a threat as the East Asians who are equally smart and cunning as the Jews, but aren't as loquacious or politically ambitious as the Indians.

    But the Jews should be careful what they wish for. The Indians are as clannish and politically ambitious as the Jews, and they are far larger in number. It won't take long before they supplant the Jews as the dominant group, especially once Trump and the GOP traitors eliminate the per country limit on green cards so we can be swamped by Indians.
    , @CanSpeccy
    In error, I attached my comment #293 to anon's comment on your comment that Jews could not have risen to great power in the US:

    ...had the Sermon on the Mount had as many readers as “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?”
     
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  220. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous
    The Czar's assassins left the following written on the wall at the scene of the murders.


    “Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht / Von seinen Knechten umgebracht,” “Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves.”


    Belshazzar, the Gentile king of Babylon who, in the Old Testament story, saw ‘the writing on the wall’ foretelling his destruction (Daniel 5) and was killed as punishment for his offences against Israel’s God. In a clever play on the Heine quotation, the unknown writer, almost certainly one of the killers, has substituted Belsatzar for Heine’s spelling Belsazar in order to signal even more clearly his intended symbolism. The Heine inscription described the racial / ethnic nature of the murders: ‘A Gentile king had just been killed as an act of Jewish retribution.’

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Heine_poem_written_on_the_wall_of_the_Ipatiev_House.gif

    The Czar’s assassins left the following written on the wall at the scene of the murders.

    “Belsatzar ward in selbiger Nacht / Von seinen Knechten umgebracht,” “Belsatzar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves.”

    Citation?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    All eight who did kill Czar and his family were Hungarian Jews. (The driver was Russian.)
    Thouse eight Jews did not speak German. After picking up the diamonds, they caught the train back to Hungary, and they disappeared.
    , @CanSpeccy

    They could not have done it had the Sermon on the Mount had as many readers as “Who Wants to be a Millionaire?”
     
    Actually, the Sermon on the Mount is more deadly than any guide to worldly fame and fortune.

    The globalists take as the message from the Mount that white people should move over and make way for the Third World. It's basically bullshit, off-yourself to make way for a settler, morality.

    And it's not what Jesus meant, if one goes by the version in St. Matthew where Jesus speaks disparagingly of gentiles.

    No, the SOTM, was a message to Jews, specifically a call to avoid inter-family and inter-tribal strife. Which makes sense. if you forgive a brother or a neighbor when he has wronged you, he knows he owes you one, and unless he's a psychopath, he will return the favor one day.

    On the other hand, if you play tit-for-tat in every encounter with those you must deal every day, you will for ever be embroiled in conflict.

    The European nations will not survive without ridding themselves of their toxic snowflake morality. That means ridding themselves of the entire bureaucratic-brainwashing machine known as the education system, and the corporate monopoly media, the latter representing a total denial free speech.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  221. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright
    '...No to mention getting physically assaulted, fire bombed. etc...'

    Point taken. However, there is a specific narrative here that calls the guardians of orthodoxy to arms: ancient Israel -- the Holocaust -- modern Israel-the need to uncritically support Israel. It's not so much anti-semites in general who become the focus of attack, but those who question the specific narrative culminating in 'our only ally and the the only democracy in the Middle East.'

    You can assert the most extravagant things about the Protocols. No one will care. But dare to suggest that Israeli 'archeology' has an agenda, and you're for it.

    It has struck me. It isn't 'antisemitism' that is the issue -- it's not viewed with favor, but no one really cares. It's anything that leads to a critical view of Israel that is targeted. When people object to 'anti-semitism,' nine times out of ten, it's 'anti-Israelism' they're objecting to. Interfere in that narrative, and you'd better have tenure.

    But dare to suggest that Israeli ‘archeology’ has an agenda, and you’re for it.

    What is the agenda of Israeli archeology?

    Read More
    • Replies: @bjondo
    That current Jew has right to steal land and kill Palestinians.

    Of course Jew has no right to Palestinian land and Israeli Archeology has proven the Jew biblical stories to be fiction.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  222. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous
    I'm afraid we may be too deep into the Jewish Problem now to avoid a terrible calamity.

    The Israelis were involved with 9/11 and they have distorted the facts of WW2 and the Holocaust in such a way that the public simply can't find out the truth. I suspect most at the top levels of government understand the reality, but there is nothing that can be done.

    The internet allows for the most obscure information to spread rapidly, and people are eventually going to find out the colossal scam that has been pulled, and they are going to be very unhappy. Learning some of this information literally put me in a depression. It will put many others in a rage.

    There are huge problems brewing and I'm sure the Israelis are aware of this and they've planned accordingly. I have a bad feeling the age old Jewish Question might be coming to a head soon.

    Learning some of this information literally put me in a depression.

    What specifically were some of the things that had an impact on you?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  223. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @CanSpeccy
    Multiculturalism is a recipe for national suicide. Culture, including religious belief, is the unifying factor that allows strangers to work with one another, by ensuring that they share the same assumptions about morality and about correct behavior in general.

    Jews have been a problem for European societies for hundreds of years. The recent mass migration of people of multiple races and religions to Europe and its settler outposts in the America's and the Pacific is creating cultural chaos.

    Immigrants who will not assimilate to the Christian culture of the West have no place in the West. For Africans, Asians, Hispanics and Middle-Easterners the message must be: assimilate or leave. The same for Jews who now, fortunately, have a place to go where they can live by the precepts of their ancient religion, however bizarre some of those precepts may seem to others.

    That then leaves only the problem of the Palestinians. A solution can surely be found in a deal with Egypt. The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants. The US could easily organize a purchase, funded by itself, Britain, the country primarily responsible for the dispossession of the Palestinians, the EU, Russia and some other countries, and of course Israel, which would have to pay for the land and houses of the departing Palestinians.

    At say $10,000 per hectare, a ridiculous price for a desert sand and rocky hillsides, the whole of Sinai could be purchased for $60 billion, a trivial amount in relation to the US trillion-dollar defense budget. In addition, there might be a need for something like half a trillion dollars for construction of the the cities and high-tech desert agricultural system of the new Palestinian state. But again, that is a rather trivial amount over, say ten years.

    Sounds like a good plan. Or simply subsidize the Palestinians at $10,000 per head to relocate there. As there are 4.4 million Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza Strip combined, that should only cost $44 Billion, chump change compared to the $2.4 Trillion we’ve spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars since 2003. Leave the entire Mideast to Israel after that. If they can’t make peace with anyone it’s their wars to fight.

    Someone needs to go sell this “diversity is strength”, “immigrants enrich their host country” propaganda to the Egyptians. Aren’t Jews good at sales?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  224. renfro says:
    @CanSpeccy
    Multiculturalism is a recipe for national suicide. Culture, including religious belief, is the unifying factor that allows strangers to work with one another, by ensuring that they share the same assumptions about morality and about correct behavior in general.

    Jews have been a problem for European societies for hundreds of years. The recent mass migration of people of multiple races and religions to Europe and its settler outposts in the America's and the Pacific is creating cultural chaos.

    Immigrants who will not assimilate to the Christian culture of the West have no place in the West. For Africans, Asians, Hispanics and Middle-Easterners the message must be: assimilate or leave. The same for Jews who now, fortunately, have a place to go where they can live by the precepts of their ancient religion, however bizarre some of those precepts may seem to others.

    That then leaves only the problem of the Palestinians. A solution can surely be found in a deal with Egypt. The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants. The US could easily organize a purchase, funded by itself, Britain, the country primarily responsible for the dispossession of the Palestinians, the EU, Russia and some other countries, and of course Israel, which would have to pay for the land and houses of the departing Palestinians.

    At say $10,000 per hectare, a ridiculous price for a desert sand and rocky hillsides, the whole of Sinai could be purchased for $60 billion, a trivial amount in relation to the US trillion-dollar defense budget. In addition, there might be a need for something like half a trillion dollars for construction of the the cities and high-tech desert agricultural system of the new Palestinian state. But again, that is a rather trivial amount over, say ten years.

    I see you are promoting the ‘Zionist Jerusalem Summit’ plan for transferring the Palestines out of Palestine.
    Since the Palestine’s ancestors were the first and constant inhabitants of Palestine -going back 9000 years….it should be the Jews who are transferred out–don’t you think.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Since the Palestine’s ancestors were the first and constant inhabitants of Palestine -going back 9000 years….it should be the Jews who are transferred out–don’t you think.
     
    No. Justice ain't got nuthin' to do with it.

    It's a question of what's feasible. Egypt will never give or sell land to Israel or accommodate millions of Jewish immigrants, whereas the Palestinians, as Muslims and members of the Arab family, would surely be acceptable.

    Moreover, any such settlement would have to involve solemn and internationally backed diplomatic agreements: A treaty of perpetual peace between Israel and New Palestine, and a treaty of perpetual mutual defense between New Palestine and Egypt. In that way, the New Palestinian state would provide Egypt with hugely increased security on its Eastern border.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  225. Druid says:
    @nagra
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIesXORjBps
    (if I may)

    You’re right about many immigrant Moslems to your country,nut your defense and outcry on behalf of the Talmudists is pure stupidity!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  226. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @lavoisier
    Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?

    The man is fearless and tackles all manner of forbidden subjects with the fine vision of the scholar.

    I think he is quite remarkable.

    Hear hear. If more Jews were as honest and open to self-critique as Ron Unz they wouldn’t have been so distrusted throughout history. As it is, he is a rare bird. One in 15 million. Cheers to Ron, for this article and this awesome website.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  227. anon[348] • Disclaimer says:
    @escobar
    Jew Derangement Syndrome?

    The Kushners and gang from Goldman Sachs embody the American dream: amassing wealth. In a culture where nothing matters as much, Jews rose to great power. They could not have done it had the Sermon on the Mount had as many readers as "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" had watchers. The peddler in the old shtetl got the chance in America to run a private equity firm and amass assets of $12 billion. As that swell fellow Larry Summers said "We're the insiders now." They played the American game and the few fielded the strongest team. The Asian-Americans will challenge.
    We are a market democracy, not a people's democracy.
    "The world is not run by justice and morality, but by power and money, and money buys power."
    Stevenson warned us in 1956, Ike in 1961, Carter in 1980. Eh.

    The Asian-Americans will challenge.

    The Jews are carefully grooming East Indians to take over as puppet CEOs, college deans, bureaucrats, judges, prosecutors etc. They make for the perfect puppets as they worship whites, are mostly English speaking, loquacious as the Jews, smarter than blacks but have dark skin, and aren’t as big of a threat as the East Asians who are equally smart and cunning as the Jews, but aren’t as loquacious or politically ambitious as the Indians.

    But the Jews should be careful what they wish for. The Indians are as clannish and politically ambitious as the Jews, and they are far larger in number. It won’t take long before they supplant the Jews as the dominant group, especially once Trump and the GOP traitors eliminate the per country limit on green cards so we can be swamped by Indians.

    Read More
    • Replies: @renfro

    The Jews are carefully grooming East Indians to take over as puppet CEOs, college deans, bureaucrats, judges, prosecutors etc
     
    Correct----they are doing just that.
    , @jsm
    Just thinking out loud. Maybe this is a good thing. Maybe this is actually a strategy that can work to our advantage?

    Consider: One thing that allowed Jews to wrest control while keeping the Flyover Country kinda naive about it, is that Jews can "pass" as Whites. Flyover country rubes are just now realizing that the people in charge Are Not Like Them and Do Not Like Them. Not true for Indians. The dark skin is a dead giveway.

    Plus, stupid Rapture Bunnies think they have to "stand with Israel" to get Jesus to come back in time to save them from the grave. So, Jews get a "pass" from criticism.
    Not true of Hindu Indians. Scofield's Bible doesn't promise that Jesus Will Come Back Soon if dot-Indians get to move into Palestine.

    So, when Indians wrest control from Jews in America, it's gonna be a lot harder for them to hold down the natural inclination of White people to Throw Them Out. Hindus are no real threat. After all, the British Raj, all, what, several hundred of them, managed to dominate a billion of 'em in their own country.

    So, let the Indians take over from the Jews. Getting our country back will then become a million percent easier.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  228. Wally says:
    @ohmy
    It's been years since I searched the internet for news print references prior to 1930 of 6 million Jews dead or dying. I was amazed when I discovered over 25 newspaper articles, some from as early as the 1890's, either proclaiming, or predicting 6 million Jews are in danger of dying, or starving in Eastern Europe or Russia. Many of the articles asked for donations. Check it out yourself. It has been a scam for 130 years.

    said:
    ” I was amazed when I discovered over 25 newspaper articles, some from as early as the 1890′s, either proclaiming, or predicting 6 million Jews are in danger of dying, or starving in Eastern Europe or Russia. ”

    Here you go, Jews have been pushing their ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1823:

    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF

    and:
    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Heros
    All the centuries of jewish genocides of Christians are starting to catch up with them, 30m Ukrainians starved, 30m Russians gulaged, 30m Germans firebombed and obliterated. So obviously, 6 million is no longer sufficient to keep the profits from the cult of Holohoax flowing.

    No Worries, the jews have a typical jew solution : We'll tell even bigger lies!

    https://twitter.com/cursedsalad/status/1020938256962088960
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  229. Druid says:
    @nagra
    I would rather call a spare pope as a witness in global
    never heard about bosnian nation or language as well
    \same happens on the land of so called palestine now\

    Your writing doesn’t correspond to the verbal pro -Israli diatribe in your above post. You must be a zio shill

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  230. Anonymous[161] • Disclaimer says:
    @attilathehen
    Here is an interesting comment from the Amazon website:

    "There's an apocryphal story about David Bowie meeting Christopher Isherwood, author of "Berlin Stories." Bowie said something to the effect that it must have been exciting to be in Weimar Germany during the Roaring Twenties, what with the tycoons, transvestites, and spies all rubbing shoulders. At this point Isherwood felt compelled to let the relatively younger man know that he was a writer of fiction, and that the Weimar that fed his adventurous stories was very much fabricated.

    The point of this anecdote is to highlight how elusive the reality of any bygone era is at a certain remove, and to further point out that Mel Gordon does the reader interested in the real history of Weimar a bit of a disservice by (by his own admission) ignoring anything that doesn't serve his sensationalist agenda. "Eroticism" is a subjective term, and while I didn't object to the S & M/ gender play content (or even the urolagnia/coprophagia), the sexualization of children glorified in the book (even if Gordon would deny this was his intent) was a bit much too stomach.

    Taken in the right spirit, as something in the same vein as Kenneth Anger's "Hollywood Babylon," which is to say a kind of salacious bit of tabloid-style light reading, the book really isn't half bad. Some of the photos, flyers, and bits of artwork are essential Weimar memorabilia that help give the reader insight into Germany's ill-fated experiment with democracy in the post-Wilhelmine era. But those of a more scholarly bent beware: there is a bibliography, but no sources, and when I attempted to find external corroboration of many of the assertions in the book, the only results I got online led me right back to this book. That's a red flag right there. Tepid recommendation."

    "Everyone knows how the Jews own the porn industry." And yet, the churches and other groups (non-Jews) do very little about it. The RCC has been taken over by homos so you won't hear condemnation of anything. The RCC is the biggest human-trafficking institution on the planet. It's not the Jews. It's the cucks. If Jews own the porn industry (which they don't), why don't they name the Jews? The Western cuck is incapable of doing anything. The cuck's mind is so twisted by "universal church" and "universal brotherhood," he can't make a statement about anything. This "blame the Jews" schtick has to end. It is time to deal squarely with the problems in the West. The cucks are going to have be dragged kicking and screaming into the battle.

    Sorry but the sexual deviance in Weimar Germany is well documented. There are other books that say the same thing. Your anecdote adding nothing.

    This “blame antisemitism” schtick is tiresome. According to Jews, Jews have never ever done anything wrong and if you point anything out you are an antisemite. There are others who participate in porn, but Jews absolutely rule this industry.

    Read More
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    Who cares what Jews say or think? This shows you are the problem. We can do what we need to do to save the West. It is cucks like you who stand in the way.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  231. peterAUS says:
    @AaronB
    That's a good point about nationalism - but I think what we are seeing in places like Russia and Poland is a resurgence of religious nationalism - pure nationalism, without a Platonic Idea, just materialism, seems to have no long term success anywhere. I don't think the attempt to revive it among materialist western right wingers will work. I think they fundamentally misunderstand this.

    In the context of a failed Communism, religious nationalism appears as progressive - as an exciting step in the direction of progress towards a higher state.

    Its not that old traditional ideas can't be revived - its that I think conservatives basically misunderstand traditional ideas. In their time, traditional ideas were meant to facilitate the self-perfection of man - not provide stability, safety, or homeostasis. Christianity was a program for the perfection of man - not social stability.

    Traditional ideas were based on a Platonic Idea - never materialism. The attempt to revive traditional ideas on a materialist basis, because they provide stability, seems a misunderstanding. In fact, traditional ideas provide stability because they were accepted as part of the plan of self-perfection. That's why they secured consent - i.e became the basis of a stable society. People accept a social organization that they believe will assist in self-perfection, and that is the source of social stability.

    As for military power projection, once local power balances alter its hard to predict what will come to seem "progressive". And short term social expedients taken in chaotic cobditions don't necessarily translate into long term social organization.

    That's my take, at any rate.

    A thoughtful post.

    ….traditional ideas were meant to facilitate the self-perfection of man – not provide stability, safety, or homeostasis. Christianity was a program for the perfection of man – not social stability.

    …..traditional ideas provide stability because they were accepted as part of the plan of self-perfection.

    I am not quite sure I get this.
    Feels as a deep topic. Not well versed in that I am afraid.

    A couple of things: the concept of “self-perfection” in, say, traditional Catholic/Orthodox Christianity, with accepting that a man is a sinner and only though Jesus he/she can find salvation.
    Then, I can get that top thinkers of those nations maybe thought along those lines; common folk, though, based their nationalism on simple living with people who shared the same values in life. Sometimes even just the same customs. The sense of belonging. The perception of “us” and “them” as the bottom line.

    You want a problem to ponder about?
    Here it is, then:
    Why such ..animosity….. then, between Catholics and Orthodox in Balkans and Ukraine? The same, now dormant, between Protestant and Catholics in N.I.?

    I guess that your approach to nationalism is, say, what…..metaphysical?
    Mine is way, way below. Just blood and soil, in that order. “Us” vs “them”.

    West is doomed re nationalism. Maybe. Not quite sure.
    All those wars of Catholics vs Protestants…………..and we are talking about people of the same race.
    Now, that “we” vs “them” is much more visible.

    ….short term social expedients taken in chaotic cobditions don’t necessarily translate into long term social organization.

    Agree.
    Again, so what? If it works during my lifetime fine (say, if I were a young man). After me, their problem. Something like that.

    Read More
    • Replies: @AaronB
    You are right about the us vs them thing. I my self argued on another thread that group conflict seems to be the human norm, whether we like it or not.

    I guess what I am trying to say is that group identity has to have a cultural and religious - a metaphysical - component to really be successful and to be strong and lasting.

    The group that lacks that metaphysical glue will fail to see itself as an "us" and will simply surrender to the "them" or join them.

    The right wing attempt to base white group identity on HBD, which is pure materialism, had never been tried before in history and will fail, it seems to me.

    All groups who have been successful at maintaining group identity, Jews, Japanese, Muslims, have a strong metaphysical element solidifying group identity.

    It is always - ethny + religion + culture, or ethny + metaphysical glue.

    The HBD attempt to base it solely on ethny does not seem like it will work.

    The HBD people look at Jews and Japanese with envy and wonder why they can't have similar ethnic solidarity - being materialists, they are blind to the metaphysical glue which holds everything together.

    If law and order break down in the US, whites who are pure materialists will likely surrender to or join and blend with other groups who are held together by metaphysical glue - they won't fight based on their race or skin color. Race isn't enough of a Platonic Idea.

    So nothing can be done until materialism ends. It is literally the main thing standing between a recovery - and all the attempts to make recovery based on materialist systems will just fail.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  232. cassandra says:
    @Wally
    "Is there any other modern writer today who is as ruthlessly honest as Ron Unz?"

    Yes of course there are.
    CODOH, www.codoh.com and Inconvenient History, https://inconvenienthistory.com/ have incredibly brave writers

    But being a Jew, Ron probably gets more slack. For how long is the question.

    www.codoh.com

    I mean intellectually honest: Unz presents evidence and sources pointing one way, then another, and then arbitrates only so far as reasonable. What separates this approach is that other articles tend to advocate for or against specific political positions. I prefer to learn facts first, and stave off taking sides to the very end, in a mostly futile effort to maintain objectivity.

    Thanks for the inconvenienthistory link. I’ve already bought the codoh library. I’m aware that there are many other brave writers, and didn’t intend to diminish anyone else’s courage.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  233. Druid says:
    @Anon
    The Skirpals were killed with a poison developed at the British defense department facility at Porton Downs, just a few miles from where they were poisoned.

    Really, amazing that after being killed, they’re still alive and in British hands!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  234. Druid says:
    @Moi
    It seems to me Jews are like the Indian Brahmins who want to keep control of the lower castes/peoples.

    So true

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  235. Druid says:
    @Dagon Shield
    Gullibility doesn't truck with exaggeration and its companion, mendacity...

    It takes a diamond to cut diamond and poison to cut poison thus it takes a Jew to expose...

    I've stated before without exaggeration I haven't met a Jew that I didn't like...

    I envy you, Ron Unz, for being able to dig up the material, and the fact that there is so much of it thanks to the record keeping, first, in European nations including Imperial Russia and second, in the Americas, whereas, if Hindu India ever wants to know how their 'Jews', the Jains, managed to impoverish the local Slavs, the Indian landed and landless peasantry. Of course, India was 'blessed' with many a type of Jew, including the real ones (which counted in its midst the local Bene Israeli, the Kochin Jews, the Baghdadi Jews and last but not least, the Ashkenazi that piggybacked with the British) unlike its linguistic sister, Europa. But for the lack of types of record with which you and others who discuss Jews and their positive as well as nefarious behaviour, the Hindu can't discover the malpractice by Jains, which has impacted him the most since time immemorial, in spite of being curious. Sadly, the dharmic attitude of believing that one's karma guides the fate, thus excessive desire to uncover your oppressor is swept away in fear of engendering additional negative credit and thus silently suffering the evil.

    Needless to say, a time will come when Jews will face up to the evils their forefathers may have engaged in and perhaps setting an example for others in non white Christian societies to fess up and modify their egregious mercantile behavior. Until such time, you enforce my belief that non-Jews'Jews behave just as badly, save the ritual blood drawing part, for after all, the Jain is a firm believer in ahimsa (the practice of nonviolence) to animals, while committing himsa (violence) to fellow human beings, who just happened to be non-Jains, i. e. the rest of humanity.

    P. S. It would be very interesting when the blood suckers of world will come into conflict over the loot and who will be victorious... I am putting my shekels on the lowly Chinese, for he is a godless materialist, who doesn't get into the socio-culture of the host societies and he will eat a porker or a dog or a cat without bringing in the superstitious hogwash of religion. Let the games begin!

    I would like to know more about what you say about the Jains.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Dagon Shield
    Better late than never...

    Lest I leave you with the erroneous impression of Jains of India, let me say poignantly that one could be assessing it incorrectly, thus it should be verified independently... caveat emptor!

    India is the bloodsuckers’ paradise and thus being ‘BLESSED’ with numerous mercantile minorities, since the Middle Ages and of all those, the unctuous Jain, should be placed atop the pyramid for his sheer chutzpah in committing the most fraudulent financial crimes equalling that of Bernie Madoff, Mark Rich, Ivan Boesky et al in India.

    And he operates under the Hindu umbrellas when acting illicitly, e.g the shyster Rajneesh of 50 plus Rolls Royce fame in Oregon (people think he was a Hindu). His imprimatur is well noted in India but remains obscured outside.

    He looks just like the Hindu majority, and talks like them for the most part expect that he may adopt a special vocabulary akin to Ashkenazi Jews mixing Yiddish to confuse the Pollack in order to gain favorable advantage.

    He eats like the Hindu vegetarians but once again, he is special in that regard as well. He is a vegan who also abhors all things yielding its offspring underground, e.g. peanuts, potatoes, onions etc. He disdains garlic to keep his libido in control but makes up for it in settling his usurious position in non-bank loans by eagerly soliciting sexual favors from his desperate debtors, thus n the face of the claims of extraordinary piety, he is lecherous at best.

    He dresses, for the most part, like a typical Hindu native but not unlike his diet, there are idiosyncrasies native to Rajasthan, the desert state.

    His faith has the semblance and trappings of Sanatana Dharma (the Hindu faith) but he is godless, not unlike Buddhist, in that his creed has no deity thus Mammon is the god;.

    The Hindu place of worship is called Mandir while his is called Derasar and is off limits to non-Jains. There are countless little other things, including skyclad priests (nude) who roam all over the land and a rat temple for which the Hindu is caricatured as well as a bird hospital or two to ease his conscious from the violence (Himsa) he inflicts upon debt ridden farmers and the downtrodden, while his much touted practice of nonviolence (Ahimsa) is strictly for the animals. And he builds the fanciest marble temples on the backs of the hoi polloi.

    He is like the Jew in many a respect save his deity-absent creed. He is the businessman of India; he controls the securities business, the stock market, the media, wholesale and retail,the new industries and Bollywood. He controls small carat diamond business and generally keeps a wary eye on Chasids, his competitors and collaborators in the gem trade. His income puts him in another level altogether and like the Jews he has his share of poorer brethren but his charity is largely confined to helping his own.

    He doesn't like menial work and prefers to do mentally challenging work. He is slow to anger and willing to wait his turn for either a great opportunity or a greater revenge. He is very clannish and doesn't allow the Indian goy into his clique so readily.

    He is smart and discreet and a teetotaler. He is gifted in his ability to do math and his children are making a huge difference to arts and sciences. He has run the Deutsche Bank and he is a right hand man of Warren Buffett.

    He rarely marries the non-Jains but like a Jew, he is fun to know on that rear chance he lets you peak into his milieu but would shun you just as easily. He is a bundle of contradictions to say the least and Hindus are stuck with him come hell or high water!

    I Hope it helps to crack open the door just a bit…
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  236. Druid says:
    @nagra
    MarkTwain was in the area in his time
    it was a pretty empty according to him

    then Jews came and they've opened it economically and land worth something
    which than attracted Arabs to move in pretending to be palestinians nowadays

    Idiot Zio fascist

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  237. Druid says:
    @nagra
    [It would be much better if you made greater effort to follow proper capitalization, spelling, spacing, and punctuation, especially if you're leaving such a large number of comments.]

    there was also war in 1948
    five Arab counties attacked
    a from the every single side
    they've lost such enterprise

    you loose war you loose territory
    that is really how the war works

    sometimes for strategic reasons
    get mature and simple get a real

    Hey nagar. You seem to be a new commenter here. We’ve heard all your BS before and it has been debunked repeatedly. You obviously are a new paid troll. Get a life !

    Read More
    • Replies: @nagra
    Who is nagar?
    ( you might be obviously drunk : )

    But since I'm "paid troll" for you would you mind to tell us what language Palestinians speak?
    Enlighten us please.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  238. Seraphim says:
    @cassandra

    It may be of greater relevance to note that Weizmann was a key Zionist lobbyist and was instrumental in securing the Balfour Declaration.
     
    The Declaration was finally made not to Weizmann but Rothschild. Curious, that.

    The Declaration was addressed in fact to the Zionist Federation.

    Why was the letter containing the Declaration addressed to Rothschild?
    I can’t better answer it than quoting a short but comprehensive article:

    “The Balfour Declaration – Why Lord Rothschild?” by Neville Teller:

    https://www.jpost.com/Blogs/A-Mid-East-Journal/The-Balfour-Declaration-why-Lord-Rothschild-505748

    [MORE]

    “In 1917 the Board of Deputies [of British Jews] was led by David Lindo Alexander, and the AJA [Anglo-Jewish Association] by Claude Montefiore. Both were convinced anti-Zionists. In their view national identity and religion were completely separate. They were Englishmen of the Jewish persuasion. There was no such thing as the Jewish nation, and they saw absolutely no need for a separate state for Jews.
    The Conjoint Committee, composed of selected members from the Board and the AJA , was led jointly by Alexander and Montefiore. Aware that Chaim Weizmann had gained the ear of the prime minister and leading members of the Cabinet, and fearful that the government was on the verge of declaring itself supportive of the Zionist cause, the joint chairmen drew up a statement of their position on the Zionist issue on behalf of the Conjoint Committee. Dated May 17, 1917, they sent it to The Times.
    The editor of The Times, a member of the upper echelons of the British establishment by virtue of his position, was George Geoffrey Dawson. He was certainly aware that prime minister Lloyd George, foreign secretary Lord Balfour, and other Cabinet ministers favored the Zionist cause. It was no secret, either, that a conference had been convened in London by the English Zionist Federation for Sunday, 20 May, 1917.
    No doubt to their disappointment, Alexander and Montefiore did not find their letter in the correspondence columns on Friday 18 May. Nor did it appear in the Saturday edition. The Zionist conference duly took place on the Sunday. As it got under way, Weizmann made a momentous announcement. “I am authorized to state in this assembly that His Majesty’s Government is ready to support our plans”. For the first time Weizmann declared publicly that the Zionists could rely upon British support and protection during their progress towards their final aim – “the creation of a Jewish Commonwealth in Palestine”.
    The wind had been taken out of the Conjoint Committee’s sails. Their letter was held back for another few days, while news of Weizmann’s announcement spread. When it finally appeared on the 24th of May, its attack on Zionism and its argument that establishing a Jewish national identity in Palestine would stamp Jews everywhere as ‘strangers in their native lands’, seemed petulant and ineffective.
    On the Monday morning The Times published three rebuttals. A letter from Lord Rothschild emphasized that the anti-Zionists did not represent Britain’s Jewish community. Britain’s Chief Rabbi Joseph Hertz asserted that the views of the Conjoint Committee belonged to a very small minority. A letter from Chaim Weizmann, as chairman of the English Zionist Federation, regretted “that there should be even two Jews who think it their duty to exert such influence as they may command against the realization of a hope which has sustained the Jewish nation through 2,000 years of exile, persecution, and temptation.”
    In the next few weeks the pro-Zionist Jewish Chronicle was bombarded with letters and statements from rabbis, readers, community leaders, synagogues, and Jewish organizations, the vast majority opposing the anti-Zionists. The resultant furore led the Board of Deputies to permit a vote to be tabled censuring the Conjoint Committee, and on June 17 it was passed by 56 to 51, with six abstentions – presumably the six Board members on the Committee. The result: the resignation of the Conjoint members, swiftly followed by that of the President of the Board, David Lindo Alexander, the co-signatory of the letter. Elected in his place was Sir Stuart Samuel, elder brother of Herbert Samuel, a former Home Secretary and later to be the first High Commissioner in Palestine.
    When Balfour penned his historic letter only four months later, the Board of Deputies was still heavily tainted by the Conjoint Committee affair, and Samuel had scarcely settled into his new position as its President. The Declaration could not be despatched to an organization so equivocal about Zionism. Lord Rothschild, a leading figure in the Anglo-Jewish community and a strong supporter of Zionism, who had written to The Times to condemn the Conjoint Committee’s statement, was the obvious recipient.
    On Sunday December 2, 1917 London’s Royal Opera House was filled to capacity. Rothschild was chairing a meeting of thanksgiving for the Declaration – thanksgiving directed, one presumes, equally to the Almighty and the British government. Besides the government officials present, Zionist dignitaries were led by Chaim ‎Weizmann and included Nahum Sokolow, secretary-general of the World Zionist Congress, Herbert Samuel and Chief Rabbi Joseph Hertz. After speeches by clergy, officials and even an Arab representative from Palestine, the occasion ended with loud cheers and the audience singing “Hatikvah.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  239. Druid says:
    @CanSpeccy
    Multiculturalism is a recipe for national suicide. Culture, including religious belief, is the unifying factor that allows strangers to work with one another, by ensuring that they share the same assumptions about morality and about correct behavior in general.

    Jews have been a problem for European societies for hundreds of years. The recent mass migration of people of multiple races and religions to Europe and its settler outposts in the America's and the Pacific is creating cultural chaos.

    Immigrants who will not assimilate to the Christian culture of the West have no place in the West. For Africans, Asians, Hispanics and Middle-Easterners the message must be: assimilate or leave. The same for Jews who now, fortunately, have a place to go where they can live by the precepts of their ancient religion, however bizarre some of those precepts may seem to others.

    That then leaves only the problem of the Palestinians. A solution can surely be found in a deal with Egypt. The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants. The US could easily organize a purchase, funded by itself, Britain, the country primarily responsible for the dispossession of the Palestinians, the EU, Russia and some other countries, and of course Israel, which would have to pay for the land and houses of the departing Palestinians.

    At say $10,000 per hectare, a ridiculous price for a desert sand and rocky hillsides, the whole of Sinai could be purchased for $60 billion, a trivial amount in relation to the US trillion-dollar defense budget. In addition, there might be a need for something like half a trillion dollars for construction of the the cities and high-tech desert agricultural system of the new Palestinian state. But again, that is a rather trivial amount over, say ten years.

    If you’re not an American Indian, the best suggestion is that YOU leave!

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    If you’re not an American Indian, the best suggestion is that YOU leave!
     
    No, you are either one of the many liberal dupes and fools who fail to understand the meaning of open borders, or a settler intent on usurping the place of the Europeans in the Americas.

    The Europeans came to the Americas because the Amerindians had open borders. The Amerindians were thus displaced as the owners of the land. The Euro settlers are now faced by would-be usurpers, the settlers yelping about "white privilege" with the backing of a treasonous elite and a cretinous so-called academic establishment.

    If the Euro-Americans do not fight back ruthlessly, kicking out disruptive non-assimilating inmmigrants, booting the traitors from political office, the bureaucracy and the educational/brainwashing system, while getting on an reproducing themselves, then they will be finished too.

    But I'm going nowhere voluntarily. And if you wanna make something of it, I'll get a gun, if necessary.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  240. Heros says:
    @Anonymous
    Let wealthy Jews negotiate a price for Palestine with the Palestinian leadership. And let wealthy Jews pay for it.

    Jews don’t pay retail. Just ask a Palestinian.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  241. renfro says:

    The Jews are furious that this bill hasnt passed yet. All these demands Jews make on the US and tax payer money make me anti Jewish in general although I will recognize a few ‘righteous Jews just as Jews recognize only a very few righteous gentiles.

    115th CONGRESS
    1st Session

    H. R. 1911

    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to monitor and combat anti-Semitism globally, and for other purposes.

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    April 5, 2017

    [MORE]

    Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Engel, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Bilirakis, and Mr. Veasey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

    A BILL

    To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to monitor and combat anti-Semitism globally, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
    SECTION 1. Short title.

    This Act may be cited as the “Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Act of 2017”.

    SEC. 2. Finding.

    Congress finds that since the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004 was enacted, in many foreign countries acts of anti-Semitism have been frequent and wide in scope, the perpetrators and variety of threats to Jewish communities and their institutions have proliferated, and in some countries anti-Semitic attacks have increased in frequency, scope, violence, and deadliness.

    SEC. 3. Monitoring and Combating anti-Semitism.

    Subsection (a) of section 59 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2731) is amended—

    (1) in paragraph (2)—

    (A) in subparagraph (A)—

    (i) by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate”; and

    (ii) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Special Envoy shall report directly to the Secretary.”; and

    (B) in subparagraph (B)—

    (i) by striking the first sentence; and

    (ii) in the third sentence, by striking “The Secretary may allow such officer or employee to retain the position (and the responsibilities associated with such position)” and inserting “Such officer or employee may not retain the position (or the responsibilities associated with such position)”; and

    (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:

    “(3) DUTIES.—The Special Envoy shall serve as the primary advisor to, and coordinate efforts across, the United States Government relating to monitoring and combating anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement that occur in foreign countries.

    “(4) RANK AND STATUS OF AMBASSADOR.—The Special Envoy shall have the rank of ambassador.

    “(5) QUALIFICATIONS.—The Special Envoy should be a person of recognized distinction in the field of—

    “(A) combating anti-Semitism; or

    “(B) religious freedom.”.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    The treasonous and money-loving sponsors of the Bill -- Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Engel, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Deutch, Mr. Bilirakis, and Mr. Veasey -- should watch this bloody abuse of an honorable American veteran by the lawless IDF: https://consortiumnews.com/2018/07/30/gaza-flotilla-ship-al-awda-violently-seized-by-israelis-uss-liberty-survivor-amongst-those-captured/
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=cclT8AV98VM
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  242. renfro says:
    @anon

    The Asian-Americans will challenge.
     
    The Jews are carefully grooming East Indians to take over as puppet CEOs, college deans, bureaucrats, judges, prosecutors etc. They make for the perfect puppets as they worship whites, are mostly English speaking, loquacious as the Jews, smarter than blacks but have dark skin, and aren't as big of a threat as the East Asians who are equally smart and cunning as the Jews, but aren't as loquacious or politically ambitious as the Indians.

    But the Jews should be careful what they wish for. The Indians are as clannish and politically ambitious as the Jews, and they are far larger in number. It won't take long before they supplant the Jews as the dominant group, especially once Trump and the GOP traitors eliminate the per country limit on green cards so we can be swamped by Indians.

    The Jews are carefully grooming East Indians to take over as puppet CEOs, college deans, bureaucrats, judges, prosecutors etc

    Correct—-they are doing just that.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  243. APilgrim says:

    One of the premises of Martin Luther, is now null & void. Both the USA & Russia have recognized Jerusalem as the capital city of Israel. (I am a Lutheran.)

    On the Jews and Their Lies, Martin Luther, (1543), Translated by Martin H. Bertram, http://www.prchiz.pl/pliki/Luther_On_Jews.pdf

    Therefore a Christian should be content and not argue with the Jews. But if you have to or want to talk with them, do not say any more than this: “Listen, Jew, are you aware that Jerusalem and your sovereignty, together with your temple and priesthood, have been destroyed for over 1,460 years?” For this year, which we Christians write as the year 1542 since the birth of Christ, is exactly 1,468 years, going on fifteen hundred years, since Vespasian and Titus destroyed Jerusalem and expelled the Jews from the city. Let the Jews bite on this nut and dispute this question as long as they wish. For such ruthless wrath of God is sufficient evidence that they assuredly have erred and gone astray. Even a child can comprehend this. For one dare not regard God as so cruel that he would punish his own people so long, so terribly, so unmercifully, and in addition keep silent, comforting them neither with words nor with deeds, and fixing no time limit and no end to it. Who would have faith, hope, or love toward such a God? Therefore this work of wrath is proof that the Jews, surely rejected by God, are no longer his people, and neither is he any longer their God. This is in accord with Hosea 1:9, “Call his name Not my people, for you are not my people and I am not your God.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  244. APilgrim says:

    What does this phrase mean to the Ashkenazim? Bible: Ezekiel Chapter 18, Verse 1:

    … “The word of the LORD came unto me again, saying,” …

    Did Ezekiel hear something? Did he read something? Did someone say something?

    Or is it a literary technique for telling an entertaining old story?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  245. @CanSpeccy
    Multiculturalism is a recipe for national suicide. Culture, including religious belief, is the unifying factor that allows strangers to work with one another, by ensuring that they share the same assumptions about morality and about correct behavior in general.

    Jews have been a problem for European societies for hundreds of years. The recent mass migration of people of multiple races and religions to Europe and its settler outposts in the America's and the Pacific is creating cultural chaos.

    Immigrants who will not assimilate to the Christian culture of the West have no place in the West. For Africans, Asians, Hispanics and Middle-Easterners the message must be: assimilate or leave. The same for Jews who now, fortunately, have a place to go where they can live by the precepts of their ancient religion, however bizarre some of those precepts may seem to others.

    That then leaves only the problem of the Palestinians. A solution can surely be found in a deal with Egypt. The Sinai is twice the size of Palestine, yet has only a half a million inhabitants. The US could easily organize a purchase, funded by itself, Britain, the country primarily responsible for the dispossession of the Palestinians, the EU, Russia and some other countries, and of course Israel, which would have to pay for the land and houses of the departing Palestinians.

    At say $10,000 per hectare, a ridiculous price for a desert sand and rocky hillsides, the whole of Sinai could be purchased for $60 billion, a trivial amount in relation to the US trillion-dollar defense budget. In addition, there might be a need for something like half a trillion dollars for construction of the the cities and high-tech desert agricultural system of the new Palestinian state. But again, that is a rather trivial amount over, say ten years.

    Ridiculous. Your thinking is as outlandishly off the planet rational as mine. Actually I think I prefer your solution to my Taxpayer State single state solution and yours would be cheap at three times the price – which might be getting closer than your $60 billion to make it work (think of how much Egypt would calculate that it could extort. Think of the incentives to get the first million Palestinians to move. Fortunately a lot of Israeli research and development for the Negev would be a plus for Sinai).

    My Taxpayer State would put off Palestinian political control by reproductive superiority by 100 years or more by giving substantial additional political power – not least blocking power – to serious net taxpayers. It is just an old idea revived with modifications for this century.

    Read More
    • Replies: @CanSpeccy

    Ridiculous.
     
    Yeah, well the Devil would be in the details, no doubt. But there's a lot of plus in it for the Egyptians. At present, Sinai is an open invitation to Israeli expansion. Filled with Palestinian Arabs cultivating the desert using, as you point out,* Israeli technology, Sinai would contribute to both the territorial and food security of Egypt.

    ———
    * It's interesting to look at the satellite image of the Israel Egypt border. The way intensive farming stops at the Israeli border, indicates the potential of Sinai.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More...