The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Unz Archive
American Pravda: Amazon Book Censorship
Banning Black Historiography During Black History Month
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

As most are surely aware, the last year or two has seen a growing crackdown on free speech and free thought across the Internet, with our constitutionally-protected First Amendment rights being circumvented through the agency of monopolistic private sector corporations such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google. Although as yet our government has not gained the power to ban discordant views nor punish their advocates, anonymous tech company censors regularly take these steps, seemingly based upon entirely opaque and arbitrary standards which lack any power of appeal. No one really knows why some individuals are banned or “de-platformed” and others are not, and surely this looming uncertainty has imposed self-censorship upon hundreds of individuals for every publicized victim who receives an exemplary punishment.

ORDER IT NOW

Some critics have attacked this policy as a new form of “McCarthyism,” but this characterization seems based upon historical ignorance. Although the notorious junior senator from Wisconsin was an alcoholic prone to making reckless, unsubstantiated charges and therefore served as an extremely poor vessel for the movement he eventually came to symbolize, his accusations of massive Communist political subversion were absolutely correct and indeed somewhat understated. Over the last quarter-century, the public release of the Venona Decrypts has demonstrated that throughout most of the Franklin Roosevelt Administration and even afterward, the top levels of our national government were honeycombed with numerous spies and traitors deeply loyal to the Soviet Union rather than the United States. Today’s ritualistic denunciations of McCarthyism are made by ignorant journalists who derive their understanding of the past from misleading Hollywood dramas rather than the meticulously researched volumes produced by leading academic scholars such as John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr.

In fact, just a few years before Sen. McCarthy burst upon the national scene, control of our federal government was nearly seized by agents of Stalin. From 1941 to 1944 FDR’s Vice President was Henry Wallace, who would have succeeded to the presidency if Roosevelt had renominated him in that latter year or had died prior to early 1945. And although Wallace himself was not disloyal, his top advisors were mostly Communist agents. Indeed, he later stated that a Wallace Administration would have included Laurence Duggan as Secretary of State and Harry Dexter White as Secretary of the Treasury, thereby installing Stalinist henchmen at the top of the Cabinet, presumably supported by numerous lower-level officials of a similar political ilk. One might jokingly speculate whether the Rosenbergs—later executed for treason—would have been placed in charge of our nuclear weapons development program.

That America’s national government of the early 1940s actually came within a hair’s breadth—or rather a heart-beat—of falling under Communist control is a very uncomfortable truth. And our history books and popular media have maintained such total silence about this remarkable episode that even among today’s well-educated Americans I suspect that fewer than five in one hundred are aware of this grim reality. Surely this should cause all sensible people to become quite cautious about blithely accepting the standard narrative of other important historical events promoted by those same sources of obfuscation.

ORDER IT NOW

Even leaving aside this total whitewash of Communist infiltration during the 1930s and 1940s, the measures imposed upon the supposed martyrs of that era utterly differ in degree from those visited upon today’s ideological dissenters. In the best-known cases, a few of Hollywood’s most highly-paid screenwriters saw their income dry up due to their Communist affiliations and were forced to cut back on their lavish lifestyles, a personal suffering treated with utmost sympathy in recent mainstream films produced by their spiritual descendants. Meanwhile, today’s targets of social wrath are almost always just working-stiffs, powerless nobodies fearfully voicing their controversial online opinions under a pseudonym before having their identities “doxxed” and then sometimes getting fired from their merely hum-drum jobs.

And even that gross disparity drastically understates the difference between then and now. During the 1950s, any proposal to ban suspected Communists from making telephone calls, watching television, renting cars, or having bank accounts surely would have been universally ridiculed as utter lunacy. But in today’s America, entirely equivalent measures are steadily growing more frequent and more severe, with very little public opposition.

Social media platforms have become the new electronic town square, and just a few weeks ago our own Israel Shamir’s recounted how he was “Banned by Facebook for Telling the Truth.” He described the absurd levels of censorship that he and so many others have suffered on that platform, sometimes even being punished with a lengthy ban merely for posting a link to his own writings.

I don’t much use Social Media myself since my long-form writings are hardly suitable for Facebook let alone the tiny character budget of Twitter. And although the latter seems effective as a means of promoting articles or distributing images or videos, the strict limits of a few dozen words surely render it much more appropriate for slogans or insults than anything more thoughtful or substantive. I find it difficult to believe that too many intelligent people have ever had their minds changed on anything significant by a few Tweets.

Amazon, however, is something else entirely. Its unmatched collection of available books comes close to fulfilling one of the original utopian goals of the very early days of the Computer Age. Over the last twenty years I’ve surely ordered many hundreds of volumes from that source, and reading them has played a huge role in transforming my beliefs on numerous important issues. For this reason, the growing wave of Amazon book-bannings carries very ominous overtones.

On February 19th, an article in Quartz denounced Amazon for continuing to carry “neo-Nazi and White Supremacist” books, and the following week most of the books in question were suddenly “disappeared” after many years of availability, in some cases apparently even vanishing from personal Kindle devices. An article published in American Renaissance provided one of the earliest accounts, and Counter-Currents has attempted to put together a comprehensive list of the dozens of vanished volumes.

The overwhelming majority of the banned works appear to be rightwing texts of a hortatory nature, generally falling under the rubric of White Nationalism or the Alt-Right. Glancing over the list, I found that I was only very slightly familiar with most of them, the most notable exception The Turner Diaries by William Pierce, which became something of a national best-seller in 1995 when the media claimed that it had served as the inspiration for the Oklahoma City Bombing. My own suspicion is that essays and articles of similar ideological sentiments exist in enormous numbers all across the Internet, and these possess vastly greater aggregate readership. It is not entirely clear what those pressuring Amazon had hoped to achieve by making those same ideas of white advocacy less available in concentrated book form. However, the almost unnoticed purge of various other Amazon books, of an entirely different nature, may have far greater negative ramifications.

 

The ADL ranks as one of our most formidable Jewish activist organizations, and according to media accounts it has been playing a central role in efforts to censor “hate speech” on leading Internet platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google’s YouTube. So it seems very likely to have also been behind Amazon’s recent purge, especially once we discover the nature of some of the more significant books now banned.

Such a role for the ADL is extremely unfortunate, given that organization’s long and very sordid history, which includes massive amounts of outright criminal activity, as I had discussed in a long article a few months ago. In fact, if not for the very widespread cowardice and dishonesty of our establishment media, the ADL would have long since lost all shreds of public credibility, and indeed most of its top leadership might well be serving long sentences in federal prison.

In recent years, almost no media mention of the late FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover fails to include condemnation of his sordid role in illegally recording Martin Luther King’s personal activities, and using that secret evidence in attempts at blackmail or intimidation, a devastating charge given King’s subsequent elevation to secular sainthood. However, none of these accounts ever reveal that it was actually ADL operatives who were spying on King and bugging his hotel rooms, then passing their tapes on to Hoover, who merely listened to them.

And that telling example of illegal 1960s ADL surveillance represents merely the smallest tip of the organization’s enormous domestic espionage activities, which have been directed against all individuals or organizations—left, right, or center—suspected of being insufficiently favorable toward Israel or Jews. By the time the FBI and local police departments broke a massive ADL spying operation in the early 1990s, the ADL was reported to be maintaining intelligence files on over one million Americans, a level of private domestic surveillance surely unequaled in our entire national history, with even some suggestions of possible involvement in political assassinations and terrorist attacks. But since the media quickly suppressed news of the scandal and the organization was punished merely with a slight slap on the wrist, there seems every likelihood ADL spying activities on ordinary Americans have actually metastasized since that point in time.

In effect, the ADL seems to function as a privatized version of our secret political police, seeking to maintain the power of the interlocking Jewish groups which dominate our society, much like the Stasi did on behalf of East Germany’s ruling Communist regime.

But for me, the most remarkable ADL revelation came in a book I purchased last year on Amazon, a book Amazon has now banned from sale. It seems that the ADL’s very origin story of one hundred years ago, frequently mentioned in my introductory history textbooks and which I had never previously questioned, actually represented an absolute inversion of historical reality. As I wrote:

Then perhaps a year or two ago, I happened to come across some discussion of the ADL’s 2013 centenary celebration, in which the leadership reaffirmed the principles of its 1913 founding. The initial impetus had been the vain national effort to save the life of Leo Frank, a young Southern Jew unjustly accused of murder and eventually lynched. Not long before, Frank’s name and story would have been equally vague in my mind, with the man half-remembered from my introductory history textbooks as one of the most notable early KKK victims in the fiercely anti-Semitic Deep South of the early twentieth century. However, not long before seeing that piece on the ADL I’d read Albert Lindemann’s highly-regarded study The Jew Accused, and his short chapter on the notorious Frank case had completely exploded all my preconceptions.

ORDER IT NOW

First, Lindemann demonstrated that there was no evidence of any anti-Semitism behind Frank’s arrest and conviction, with Jews constituting a highly-valued element of the affluent Atlanta society of the day, and no references to Frank’s Jewish background, negative or otherwise, appearing in the media prior to the trial. Indeed, five of the Grand Jurors who voted to indict Frank for murder were themselves Jewish, and none of them ever voiced regret over their decision. In general, support for Frank seems to have been strongest among Jews from New York and other distant parts of the country and weakest among the Atlanta Jews with best knowledge of the local situation.

Furthermore, although Lindemann followed the secondary sources he relied upon in declaring that Frank was clearly innocent of the charges of rape and murder, the facts he recounted led me to the opposite conclusion, seeming to suggest strong evidence of Frank’s guilt. When I much more recently read Lindemann’s longer and more comprehensive historical study of anti-Semitism, Esau’s Tears, I noticed that his abbreviated treatment of the Frank case no longer made any claim of innocence, perhaps indicating that the author himself might have also had second thoughts about the weight of the evidence.

Since I had had the impression that virtually all researchers who had investigated the Frank case had concluded that he was innocent of the rape and murder of 13-year-old Mary Phagan, I regarded my own contrary opinion as very tentative. But then someone pointed me to a 2016 book from an unexpected source that argued for Frank’s guilt. With some doubts, I clicked a couple of Amazon buttons and ordered the volume, written by the unnamed researchers of Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam (NOI). As I explained at considerable length:

Anonymous works published by heavily-demonized religious-political movements naturally engender considerable caution, but once I began reading the 500 pages of The Leo Frank Case: The Lynching of a Guilty Man I was tremendously impressed by the quality of the historical analysis. I think I have only very rarely encountered a research monograph on a controversial historical event that provided such an enormous wealth of carefully-argued analysis backed by such copious evidence. The authors seemed to display complete mastery of the major secondary literature of the last one hundred years while drawing very heavily upon the various primary sources, including court records, personal correspondence, and contemporaneous publications, with the overwhelming majority of the 1200 footnotes referencing newspaper and magazine articles of that era. The case they made for Frank’s guilt seemed absolutely overwhelming.

The facts of the case against Frank eventually became a remarkable tangle of complex and often conflicting evidence and eyewitness testimony, with sworn statements regularly being retracted and then counter-retracted. But the crucial point that the NOI authors emphasize for properly deciphering this confusing situation is the enormous scale of the financial resources that were deployed on Frank’s behalf, both prior to the trial and afterward, with virtually all of the funds coming from Jewish sources. Currency conversions are hardly precise, but relative to the American family incomes of the time, the total expenditures by Frank supporters may have been as high as $25 million in present-day dollars, quite possibly more than any other homicide defense in American history before or after, and an almost unimaginable sum for the impoverished Deep South of that period. Years later, a leading donor privately admitted that much of this money was spent on perjury and similar falsifications, something which is very readily apparent to anyone who closely studies the case. When we consider this vast ocean of pro-Frank funding and the sordid means for which it was often deployed, the details of the case become far less mysterious. There exists a mountain of demonstrably fabricated evidence and false testimony in favor of Frank, and no sign of anything similar on the other side.

The police initially suspected the black night watchman who found the girl’s body, and he was quickly arrested and harshly interrogated. Soon afterward, a bloody shirt was found at his home, and Frank made several statements that seemed to implicate his employee in the crime. At one point, this black suspect may have come close to being summarily lynched by a mob, which would have closed the case. But he stuck to his story of innocence with remarkable composure, in sharp contrast to Frank’s extremely nervous and suspicious behavior, and the police soon shifted their scrutiny toward the latter, culminating in his arrest. All researchers now recognize that the night watchman was entirely innocent, and the material against him planted.

As the investigation moved forward, a major break occurred as a certain Jim Conley, Frank’s black janitor, came forward and confessed to having been Frank’s accomplice in concealing the crime. At the trial he testified that Frank had regularly enlisted him as a lookout during his numerous sexual liaisons with his female employees, and after murdering Phagan, had then offered him a huge sum of money to help remove and hide the body in the basement so that the crime could be pinned upon someone else. But with the legal noose tightening around Frank, Conley had begun to fear that he might be made the new scapegoat, and went to the authorities in order to save his own neck. Despite Conley’s damning accusations, Frank repeatedly refused to confront him in the presence of the police, which was widely seen as further proof of Frank’s guilt.

By the time of the trial itself, all sides were agreed that the murderer was either Frank, the wealthy Jewish businessman, or Conley, the semi-literate black janitor with a first-grade education and a long history of public drunkenness and petty crime. Frank’s lawyers exploited this comparison to the fullest, emphasizing Frank’s Jewish background as evidence for his innocence and indulging in the crudest sort of racial invective against his black accuser, whom they claimed was obviously the true rapist and murderer due to his bestial nature.

Taking a broader overview, the theory advanced by Frank’s legion of posthumous advocates seems to defy rationality. These journalists and scholars uniformly argue that Conley, a semi-literate black menial, had brutally raped and murdered a young white girl, and the legal authorities soon became aware of this fact, but conspired to set him free by supporting a complex and risky scheme to instead frame an innocent white businessman. Can we really believe that the police officials and prosecutors of a city in the Old South would have violated their oath of office in order to knowingly protect a black rapist and killer from legal punishment and thereby turn him loose upon their city streets, presumably to prey on future young white girls? This implausible reconstruction is particularly bizarre in that nearly all its advocates across the decades have been the staunchest of Jewish liberals, who endlessly condemned the horrific racism of the Southern authorities of that era, but then unaccountably chose to make a special exception in this one particular case.

The NOI authors devote nearly all of their lengthy book to a careful analysis of the Frank case provided in suitably dispassionate form, but a sense of their justifiable outrage does occasionally poke through. In the years prior to Frank’s killing, many thousands of black men throughout the South had been lynched, often based on a slender thread of suspicion, with few of these incidents receiving more than a few sentences of coverage in a local newspaper, and large numbers of whites had also perished in similar circumstances. Meanwhile, Frank had received benefit of the longest trial in modern Southern history, backed by the finest trial lawyers that money could buy, and based on overwhelming evidence had been sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a young girl. But when Frank’s legal verdict was carried out by extra-judicial means, he immediately became the most famous lynching victim in American history, perhaps even attracting more media attention than all those thousands of other cases combined. Jewish money and Jewish media established him as a Jewish martyr who thereby effectively usurped the victimhood of the enormous number of innocent blacks who were killed both before and after him, none of whom were ever even recognized as individuals.

The NOI authors note that prior to Frank’s trial American history had been virtually devoid of any evidence of significant anti-Semitism, with the previous most notable incident being the case of an extremely wealthy Jewish financier who was refused service at a fancy resort hotel. But by totally distorting the Frank case and focusing such massive national media coverage on his plight, Jewish leaders around the country succeeded in fabricating a powerful ideological narrative despite its lack of reality, perhaps intending the story to serve as a bonding experience to foster Jewish community cohesion.

Let us summarize what seems to be the solidly established factual history of the Frank case, quite different than the traditional narrative. There is not the slightest evidence that Frank’s Jewish background was a factor behind his arrest and conviction, nor the death sentence he received. The case set a remarkable precedent in Southern courtroom history with the testimony of a black man playing a central role in a white man’s conviction. From the earliest stages of the murder investigation, Frank and his allies continually attempted to implicate a series of different innocent blacks by planting false evidence and using bribes to solicit perjured testimony, while the exceptionally harsh racial rhetoric that Frank and his attorneys directed towards those blacks was presumably intended to provoke their public lynching. Yet despite all these attempts by the Frank forces to play upon the notorious racial sentiments of the white Southerners of that era, the latter saw through these schemes and Frank was the one sentenced to hang for his rape and murder of that young girl.

Now suppose that all the facts of this famous case were exactly unchanged except that Frank had been a white Gentile. Surely the trial would be ranked as one of the greatest racial turning points in American history, perhaps even overshadowing Brown v. Board because of the extent of popular sentiment, and it would have been given a central place in all our modern textbooks. Meanwhile, Frank, his lawyers, and his heavy financial backers would probably be cast as among the vilest racial villains in all of American history for their repeated attempts to foment the lynching of various innocent blacks so that a wealthy white rapist and murderer could walk free. But because Frank was Jewish rather than Christian, this remarkable history has been completely inverted for over one hundred years by our Jewish-dominated media and historiography.

Prior to the creation of the Internet and the establishment of Amazon’s book-selling operation, this fascinating history would have remained completely unknown to me. Given its influential political role in our society, the ADL must certainly be concerned if it became widely known that the organization was founded with the central mission of ensuring that no wealthy and powerful Jew ever suffered punishment for the rape and murder of a young Christian girl, nor for trying to orchestrate the lynching of innocent black men in order to cover his own guilt.

When I published my original article in October, I naturally encouraged readers to order the remarkable book in question and decide for themselves. But Amazon has now chosen to ban that book of outstanding black historical scholarship at the height of Black History Month, a step taken just a few days after the ADL President made his annual glowing tribute to that national celebration of black pride. Those interested can still read my lengthy analysis of that book and the important historical event it describes.

 

The true circumstances surrounding the establishment of the ADL is not the only work of serious historical scholarship to have suddenly been removed from Amazon’s shelves, and most of the others seem to follow a very consistent pattern, certainly suggesting the hand of that organization and its kindred spirits.

For more than a half-century, Jewish political activists and engaged academics have pilloried white American society for its longstanding mistreatment of blacks, especially focusing upon the “original sin” of black slavery, and almost every morning my New York Times carries one or more articles filled with such denunciations. Americans of Anglo-Saxon founding stock are invariably portrayed as the villains of the story, with American Jews frequently cited as among the heroic supporters of the Civil Rights Movement that eventually rectified some of those injustices.

Yet just as in the case of Leo Frank, the true facts may be somewhat more complex. Over a quarter-century ago, the same group of provocative NOI researchers published a fascinating volume gathering together a huge quantity of historical evidence suggesting that prior to the Civil War, America’s tiny Jewish population had actually played an enormously disproportionate role in establishing and promoting black slavery, with their co-ethnics even sometimes outright dominating that institution in the vast and exceptionally cruel slave plantations of Latin America, which were frequently operated like death-camps. These claims are hardly so implausible given that slave-trading had been a very traditional Jewish occupation in much of Europe and the Middle East for the last thousand years, and it is probably more than coincidence that the largest centers of Jewish settlement in Colonial America tended to be those cities focused on the slave trade.

ORDER IT NOW

I am hardly a specialist in pre-Civil War history, and weighing the strength of the evidence presented is beyond my expertise. But I did also order and read an angry rebuttal book published a couple of years later by a Dr. Harold Brackman, a Jewish historian working in conjunction with the auspices of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, and found his arguments quite thin and unpersuasive.

Under normal circumstances, scholars of varied opinions would debate this controversial thesis back and forth and eventually come to some conclusion. But when Tony Martin, a prominent black scholar at Wellesley, merely put the provocative book on the reading list of one of his black history courses, he was ferociously vilified in the media and saw his career ruined, with concerted efforts made to fire him despite his tenured position. He later recounted the situation he faced in a short book.

ORDER IT NOW

I briefly mentioned the study and its thesis in a July article and suggested those intrigued by the dispute order it from Amazon and evaluate the evidence for themselves. Alas, that is no longer possible since Amazon has now banned the work, although all the subsequent books rebutting the thesis or discussing the huge controversy it aroused are still freely available. This strongly suggests that the evidence presented of a massive Jewish role in black slavery was simply too compelling to be easily refuted.

 

These anonymous black research studies prepared under the auspices of the Nation of Islam are hardly alone among serious historical texts now banned by Amazon. Indeed, groundbreaking works by eminent Jewish scholars may now also suffer a similar fate if they stray into forbidden territory. As I wrote at length last year:

I do not doubt that much of the candid analysis provided above will be quite distressing to many individuals. Indeed, some may believe that such material far exceeds the boundaries of mere “anti-Semitism” and easily crosses the threshold into constituting an actual “blood libel” against the Jewish people. That extremely harsh accusation, widely used by stalwart defenders of Israeli behavior, refers to the notorious Christian superstition, prevalent throughout most of the Middle Ages and even into more modern times, that Jews sometimes kidnapped small Christian children in order to drain their blood for use in various magic rituals, especially in connection with the Purim religious holiday. One of my more shocking discoveries of the last dozen years is that there is a fairly strong likelihood that these seemingly impossible beliefs were actually true.

I personally have no professional expertise whatsoever in Jewish ritual traditions, nor the practices of Medieval Jewry. But one of the world’s foremost scholars in that field is Ariel Toaff, professor of Jewish Renaissance and Medieval Studies at Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv, and himself the son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome.

In 2007, he published the Italian edition of his academic study Blood Passovers, based on many years of diligent research, assisted by his graduate students and guided by the suggestions of his various academic colleagues, with the initial print run of 1,000 copies selling out on the first day. Given Toaff’s international eminence and such enormous interest, further international distribution, including an English edition by a prestigious American academic press would normally have followed. But the ADL and various other Jewish-activist groups regarded such a possibility with extreme disfavor, and although these activists lacked any scholarly credentials, they apparently applied sufficient pressure to cancel all additional publication. Although Prof. Toaff initially attempted to stand his ground in stubborn fashion, he soon took the same course as Galileo, and his apologies naturally became the basis of the always-unreliable Wikipedia entry on the topic.

It appears that a considerable number of Ashkenazi Jews traditionally regarded Christian blood as having powerful magical properties and considered it a very valuable component of certain important ritual observances at particular religious holidays. Obviously, obtaining such blood in large amounts was fraught with considerable risk, which greatly enhanced its monetary value, and the trade in the vials of this commodity seems to have been widely practiced.

Obviously, the ritual murder of Christian children for their blood was viewed with enormous disfavor by the local Gentile population, and the widespread belief in its existence remained a source of bitter tension between the two communities, flaring up occasionally when a Christian child mysteriously disappeared at a particular time of year, or when a body was found that exhibited suspicious types of wounds or showed a strange loss of blood. Every now and then, a particular case would reach public prominence, often leading to a political test of strength between Jewish and anti-Jewish groups. During the mid-19th century, there was one such famous case in French-dominated Syria, and just before the outbreak of the First World War, Russia was wracked by a similar political conflict in the 1913 Beilis Affair in the Ukraine.

I first encountered these very surprising ideas almost a dozen years ago in a long article by Israel Shamir that was referenced in Counterpunch, and this would definitely be worth reading as an overall summary, together with a couple of his follow-up columns, while writer Andrew Hamilton offers the most recent 2012 overview of the controversy. Shamir also helpfully provides a free copy of the book in PDF form, an updated version with the footnotes properly noted in the text. Anyway, I lack the expertise to effectively judge the likelihood of the Toaff Hypothesis, so I would invite those interested to read Toaff’s book or better yet the related articles and decide for themselves.

Amazon has now banned the English translation of Prof. Toaff’s astonishing book, though it is still available on the Internet in PDF form at the link provided above.

 

All of these almost unprecedented Amazon book bannings occurred just in the last couple of weeks, and unless they are soon reversed, they will surely become just the first of many. The 1990s volumes on Judaism written by the late Israel Shahak, an award-winning professor at Hebrew University in Israel, will surely also be headed for oblivion. As I wrote last year:

ORDER IT NOW

Although Shahak’s books are quite short, they contain such a density of astonishing material, it would take many, many thousands of words to begin to summarize them. Essentially almost everything I had known—or thought I had known—about the religion of Judaism, at least in its zealously Orthodox traditional form, was utterly wrong.

On the most basic level, the religion of most traditional Jews is actually not at all monotheistic, but instead contains a wide variety of different male and female gods, having quite complex relations to each other, with these entities and their properties varying enormously among the numerous different Jewish sub-sects, depending upon which portions of the Talmud and the Kabala they place uppermost. For example, the traditional Jewish religious cry “The Lord Is One” has always been interpreted by most people to be an monotheistic affirmation, and indeed, many Jews take exactly this same view. But large numbers of other Jews believe this declaration instead refers to achievement of sexual union between the primary male and female divine entities. And most bizarrely, Jews having such radically different views see absolutely no difficulty in praying side by side, and merely interpreting their identical chants in very different fashion.

Furthermore, religious Jews apparently pray to Satan almost as readily as they pray to God, and depending upon the various rabbinical schools, the particular rituals and sacrifices they practice may be aimed at enlisting the support of the one or the other. Once again, so long as the rituals are properly followed, the Satan-worshippers and the God-worshippers get along perfectly well and consider each other equally pious Jews, merely of a slightly different tradition. One point that Shahak repeatedly emphasizes is that in traditional Judaism the nature of the ritual itself is absolutely uppermost, while the interpretation of the ritual is rather secondary. So perhaps a Jew who washes his hands three times clockwise might be horrified by another who follows a counter-clockwise direction, but whether the hand-washing were meant to honor God or to honor Satan would be hardly be a matter of much consequence.

If these ritualistic issues constituted the central features of traditional religious Judaism, we might regard it as a rather colorful and eccentric survival of ancient times. But unfortunately, there is also a far darker side, primarily involving the relationship between Jews and non-Jews, with the highly derogatory term goyim frequently used to describe the latter. To put it bluntly, Jews have divine souls and goyim do not, being merely beasts in the shape of men. Indeed, the primary reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve as the slaves of Jews, with some very high-ranking rabbis occasionally stating this well-known fact. In 2010, Israel’s top Sephardic rabbi used his weekly sermon to declare that the only reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve Jews and do work for them. The enslavement or extermination of all non-Jews seems an ultimate implied goal of the religion.

Jewish lives have infinite value, and non-Jewish ones none at all, which has obvious policy implications. For example, in a published article a prominent Israeli rabbi explained that if a Jew needed a liver, it would be perfectly fine, and indeed obligatory, to kill an innocent Gentile and take his. Perhaps we should not be too surprised that today Israel is widely regarded as one of the world centers of organ-trafficking.

ORDER IT NOW

As a further illustration of the seething hatred traditional Judaism radiates towards all those of a different background, saving the life of a non-Jew is generally considered improper or even prohibited, and taking any such action on the Sabbath would be an absolute violation of religious edict. Such dogmas are certainly ironic given the widespread presence of Jews in the medical profession during recent centuries, but they came to the fore in Israel when a religiously-minded military doctor took them to heart and his position was supported by the country’s highest religious authorities.

And while religious Judaism has a decidedly negative view towards all non-Jews, Christianity in particular is regarded as a total abomination, which must be wiped from the face of the earth.

Whereas pious Muslims consider Jesus as the holy prophet of God and Muhammed’s immediate predecessor, according to the Jewish Talmud, Jesus is perhaps the vilest being who ever lived, condemned to spend eternity in the bottommost pit of Hell, immersed in a boiling vat of excrement. Religious Jews regard the Muslim Quran as just another book, though a totally mistaken one, but the Christian Bible represents purest evil, and if circumstances permit, burning Bibles is a very praiseworthy act. Pious Jews are also enjoined to always spit three times at any cross or church they encounter, and direct a curse at all Christian cemeteries. Indeed, many deeply religious Jews utter a prayer each and every day for the immediate extermination of all Christians.

Over the years prominent Israeli rabbis have sometimes publicly debated whether Jewish power has now become sufficiently great that all the Christian churches of Jerusalem, Bethleham, and other nearby areas can finally be destroyed, and the entire Holy Land completely cleansed of all traces of its Christian contamination. Some have taken this position, but most have urged prudence, arguing that Jews needed to gain some additional strength before they should take such a risky step. These days, many tens of millions of zealous Christians and especially Christian Zionists are enthusiastic advocates for Jews, Judaism, and Israel, and I strongly suspect that at least some of that enthusiasm is based upon ignorance.

Shahak’s scholarly research received glowing praise from some of America’s most prominent public intellectuals, including Christopher Hitchens, Gore Vidal, Noam Chomsky, and Edward Said, as well as prestigious publications such as The London Review of Books and Middle East International. But given the political implications of his revelations, I suspect they will soon only be available on scattered websites across the Internet.

A more detailed discussion of the works of Profs. Toaff and Shahak on these lesser-known aspects of the Jewish religion can be found in my long article from last July:

 

Other Amazon books seem to have recently fallen into limbo, still being sold by that website, but hidden away so that most readers would never discover them.

ORDER IT NOW

More than thirty-five years ago, Lenni Brenner, a Jewish leftist of anti-Zionist sympathies, published his ground-breaking research revealing the extensive Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s, which laid the basis for the creation of the State of Israel. Although our media has almost entirely ignored that fascinating history, subsequent studies have fully confirmed Brenner’s central framework.

I myself only became aware of Brenner’s book last year and immediately purchased it on Amazon, then published an article in which I discussed his important findings:

Although the Germans paid little attention to the entreaties of that minor organization, the far larger and more influential mainstream Zionist movement of Chaim Weizmann and David Ben-Gurion was something else entirely. And during most of the 1930s, these other Zionists had formed an important economic partnership with Nazi Germany, based upon an obvious commonality of interests. After all, Hitler regarded Germany’s one percent Jewish population as a disruptive and potentially dangerous element which he wanted gone, and the Middle East seemed as good a destination for them as any other. Meanwhile, the Zionists had very similar objectives, and the creation of their new national homeland in Palestine obviously required both Jewish immigrants and Jewish financial investment.

The importance of the Nazi-Zionist pact for Israel’s establishment is difficult to overstate. According to a 1974 analysis in Jewish Frontier cited by Brenner, between 1933 and 1939 over 60% of all the investment in Jewish Palestine came from Nazi Germany. The worldwide impoverishment of the Great Depression had drastically reduced ongoing Jewish financial support from all other sources, and Brenner reasonably suggests that without Hitler’s financial backing, the nascent Jewish colony, so tiny and fragile, might easily have shriveled up and died during that difficult period.

Such a conclusion leads to fascinating hypotheticals. When I first stumbled across references to the Ha’avara Agreement on websites here and there, one of the commenters mentioning the issue half-jokingly suggested that if Hitler had won the war, statues would surely have been built to him throughout Israel and he would today be recognized by Jews everywhere as the heroic Gentile leader who had played the central role in reestablishing a national homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine after almost 2000 years of bitter exile.

This sort of astonishing counter-factual possibility is not nearly as totally absurd as it might sound to our present-day ears. We must recognize that our historical understanding of reality is shaped by the media, and media organs are controlled by the winners of major wars and their allies, with inconvenient details often excluded to avoid confusing the public.

Once Hitler consolidated power in Germany, he quickly outlawed all other political organizations for the German people, with only the Nazi Party and Nazi political symbols being legally permitted. But a special exception was made for German Jews, and Germany’s local Zionist Party was accorded complete legal status, with Zionist marches, Zionist uniforms, and Zionist flags all fully permitted. Under Hitler, there was strict censorship of all German publications, but the weekly Zionist newspaper was freely sold at all newsstands and street corners. The clear notion seemed to be that a German National Socialist Party was the proper political home for the country’s 99% German majority, while Zionist National Socialism would fill the same role for the tiny Jewish minority.

In 1934, Zionist leaders invited an important SS official to spend six months visiting the Jewish settlement in Palestine, and upon his return, his very favorable impressions of the growing Zionist enterprise were published as a massive 12-part-series in Joseph Goebbel’s Der Angriff, the flagship media organ of the Nazi Party, bearing the descriptive title “A Nazi Goes to Palestine.”

ORDER IT NOW

Just last year, the Brenner books I purchased immediately popped up on the Amazon website, but these days they are hidden away, not even appearing on his nearly empty author page. One suspects that the ADL or similar organizations are very reluctant to have readers discover Brenner’s extensive collection of primary source documents or the paperback edition of his historical narrative, whose cover shows the commemorative medal struck by Nazi Germany to mark its Zionist alliance, displaying the Swastika on one side and the Jewish Star-of-David on the other. Those interested in the entire complex and rather surprising historical relationship between Jews and the Third Reich during its dozen years of existence should consider reading my article on the subject.

 

Jews today constitute less than 1% of the combined population of North America and the European Union, yet any honest observer would have to admit that organized Jewish groups totally dominate the politics and public life of these once-proud nations, which during past centuries had ruled most of the world.

The primary factor behind this astonishing control now exercised over populations that are 99% non-Jewish is probably the powerful leverage Jews today hold over money and media. But an important secondary factor has been the gradual elevation of the Jewish Holocaust of World War II into the status of a near-sacred doctrine, largely replacing traditional Christianity as an official state religion, with dissenters generally treated as heretics and frequently subjected to government prosecution or imprisonment. Indeed, it seems that virtually every morning my newspapers are filled with Holocaust articles, most of them written with the same sort of sacred reverence that Catholic newspapers a century ago might have given to discussions of the Virgin Birth. However, because this so-called “Holocaustianity” purports to be a secular faith, it remains vulnerable to dispute on factual grounds, and many have suggested that its collapse would strike a mortal blow against reigning Jewish power.

The ADL and other Jewish activist organizations certainly seem extremely reluctant to take that risk. We should hardly be surprised that the first great large wave of Amazon book-bannings was the early 2017 purge of many dozens of scholarly texts by revisionist historians who had argued at great length and in considerable detail that the Holocaust was largely a hoax, concocted by Jewish activists and Hollywood filmmakers as a powerful shield against any criticism of Jewish or Israeli misbehavior. Although many of these books are still available for sale by their publisher, their complete disappearance from Amazon has greatly reduced their potential distribution.

Fortunately, I had purchased copies of several such books while Amazon still stocked them, and last year I published a long article summarizing my own conclusions about that complex and highly contentious topic. Although I am hardly an expert, it seemed to me that there was an enormous amount of persuasive evidence that the Holocaust is indeed substantially fraudulent, and quite possibly, almost entirely so. Those interested in considering my reasoning are welcome to do so and decide for themselves.

 

ORDER IT NOW

Probably the most famous dystopian novel of the last one hundred years is George Orwell’s 1984, and perhaps its most memorable observation is that those who control the past control the future and those who control the present control the past. And we should recognize that serious books constitute the congealed nature of that past.

Our electronic media and its new social offshoot may dominate the thoughts of our population, and perhaps a single Tweet by a third-tier political celebrity might attract more readers in an hour than all the books discussed in this article have drawn in a year. But while effervescent, such electronic media emanations are transitory and fleeting, and quite likely to be forgotten an hour later. Meanwhile, serious books of ideas and scholarship have the potential to permanently reshape the contours of reality accepted by the sort of individuals who may eventually alter our society. During a heated national election campaign, billions of dollars may be expended to temporarily shift public opinion on some issue or candidate, but a few weeks later, the effect has usually dissipated. Books may cost just a few dollars, but their potential impact is of a different order of weight and permanency.

Amazon today possesses a near-total monopoly over Internet book sales, and if American society continues to allow it to ban serious works of scholarship on political or ideological grounds, our future intellectual freedom has already been lost.

Related Readings:

 
The American Pravda Series
Hide 692 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Yeah, right. Communists are, or were, or whatever you are up to, about to take over the US. Right, check. I really believed it then and I really believe it now. This is like the class old-fashioned 1950s tin-foil-hat rightwing conservative stupidity cubed. Listen. You don’t have to write this. They already wrote it all in the 1950s. Go back to them.

  2. wayfarer says:

    “Gab’s Dissenter is a Game Changer!”

  3. …the strict limits of a few dozen words surely leave render it much more appropriate for slogans or insults than anything more thoughtful or substantive.

    It would be great for aphorisms. I was going to say that GK Chesterton would have fit perfectly, but someone probably has a Chesterton tweet stream going right now.

    And yep, here it is:

    [MORE]

    …the extensive Nazi-Zionist economic partnership of the 1930s, which laid the basis for the creation of the State of Israel.

    It’s old news that the early National Socialists were friendly with German Zionists, as they shared the goal of resettling the country’s Jews. But it is surprising that this didn’t come to a halt once they turned the party over to the psychotic faggot with the mustache. Was it done behind his back?

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @m___
    , @Wally
  4. Rational says:

    THE DARK AGES ARE UPON US, BUT WE HAVE TO FIGHT IT….

    Thanks for the very excellent article, Sir. You truly are a great man to write such wonderful articles, and one of the greatest human being alive today, for sure, to stand up against such monumental evil that is being heaped upon us. ADL types are afraid of the truth, for sure, or they would not be trying to suppress it.

    Unfortunately, the Republicans failed to pass any law, despite controlling the house and the presidency, to ban political opinion discrimination by social media tech companies.

    Now, the burden falls on the states. They CAN pass laws banning internet censorship of political opinions or discrimination and acquire long arm jurisdiction over the tech giants, who do business in all states. The courts are another option, using existing civil rights statutes, but a federal law would have been better.

    As far as Amazon, there are 2 options:

    a. We must make a list of books that it banned, and set up websites selling them in electronic formats, or paper formats to be drop-shipped by author/publisher, eliminating need for inventory (ebay model). Maybe you can start a company like that? The added revenue will only help.

    There are ready made software solutions now whereby one can set up an online store easily.

    b. Boycott amazon.

  5. Kudos for the outstanding review of the Nation of Islam’s The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews volume three (Leo Frank).

    A couple of items for the record: 1. the book was available for years at Amazon. On Feb. 17 this writer gave a speech at the national “Saviour’s Day” convention of the Nation of Islam where I referred to the The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews as “magisterial revisionist history.” My speech was denounced by the ADL. The week after the speech, Amazon banned all three volumes of The Secret Relationship. Coinicidence?

    2. After being sold by Amazon since 2011, on August 13 my work, Judaism’s Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded was banned by the company in hard copy and on the digital Kindle platform, as was another volume of mine, The Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West’s Most Sacred Relic, which Amazon had sold for nine years.

    3. Furthermore, in February, 2016 more than a hundred so-called “Holocaust denial” books, many of a highly technical and scholarly nature, were removed by Amazon (cf. Revisionist History no. 93 [November 2017]).

    Prior to our post-modernist era, many reasonably literate Americans of the 1960s-1990s, regarded the censorship of any book other than pornography or calls for violence, as a disgrace.

    Now Amazon routinely bans history books with absolute impunity, while Jeff Bezos’ Washington Post, which has never reported at any length on Amazon’s ban on politically incorrect history volumes, continues to propagate its slogan, “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” with no outcry from other journalists or “public intellectuals” over the “darkness” which many worthy books of history and theology have been consigned by Bezos’ Amazon, a business which initially rose to prominence by gaining a reputation as a libertarian mecca for authors and seekers after knowledge unhindered by gatekeepers. Alas, now that he’s wealthier than the dreams of King Midas, such considerations apparently no longer concern Mr. Bezos.

  6. Lot says:

    Amazon doesn’t want antisemitic business, good for them putting morality over profits.

    It is wonderful that our free country gives us such choice.

  7. The Indian girl ELIZABETH declared that as a president she would break up Amazon, Google. Facebook and Twitter. (she has my vote.) She is better than Trump.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  8. anon[182] • Disclaimer says:

    It will get worse. Look what Google is up to in China:

    “Dragonfly would not only allow Chinese authorities to prevent citizens from learning about issues like human rights, but it would also, according to one Google employee who resigned in protest, even block access to accurate air quality data. … But that’s not all. Dragonfly would reportedly link Chinese users’ search queries directly to their phone numbers, according to The Guardian. The search engine will also track the locations of Chinese users.”

    https://thinkprogress.org/google-dragonfly-china-censorship-human-rights-fe1fe1ddf55a/

    “Google employees aren’t convinced that Dragonfly is dead”

    https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/4/18250285/google-dragonfly-censored-search-engine-code-dead-employees-doubt

    It’s not like Google needs the money, so why do you think they are doing this? My guess is that they are using the Chinese market as an excuse to develop the technology to implement a similar system in the United States; Google is state run in all but name. Deplatforming critics like Alex Jones (a clearly coordinated event), censoring books, down ranking critical YouTube channels, hiding controversial YouTube videos, and censoring internet searches is where we are now; linking your name to your activities and directing you to approved sources is the next logical step.

    They are now even censoring Sony’s mature rated, clearly intended for adults, Japanese video games, likely under pressure to make them less appealing to American consumers — politically correct, incompetent, American companies like Microsoft have gotten dominated by the Japanese this console generation and the video game industry is three times the size of Hollywood, and probably now more influential among the youth, so you have to know the deep state is paying attention.

    • Replies: @Gg Mo
  9. Ron:

    What is happening in publishing with Amazon is the result of the bigger problem: The Jews Control just about everything in America and most of the world. Look what they have done in Britain, France and the rest of Europe. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again they control the social-economic-politcal pathways or the world. It is almost impossible to do anything in just about any business in publishing, media (including all visual arts), and of course the internet.

    But this isn’t new and you should realize it. They owned almost all the book publishers, art labels, and music industry. Most people don’t realize that the Godfather Trilogy (as far as I know) was the first mob movie directed by someone other than a Jew! It took that long for them to allow Coppola (and Puzo who wrote the book and the screen play any creative control). They controlled all the print media to the point that even if other writers wrote pieces in magazines and newspapers they almost never got credit. Instead they would put their Jewish friends byline on it. This went on for years and years. They did the same thing in art and photo industry often pumping up their friends and down grading other artists and photographers. The one artist who beat their asses however, was the Pop Icon and creative genius, Andy Warhol. Warhol went around the regular industry pathways and became one of the most famous artist of all time. They couldn’t control him. Today I doubt if Warhol could do what he did back then because they have tightened their grip because almost everything goes through the internet.

    The original men’s magazine Esquire was almost not named Esquire because one of the founders Arnold Gingrich thought the name sounded too Jewish and they wouldn’t be able to attract good writers because of the way the Jews ran the industry of ripping everyone off. The Internet is now controlled by them because they mastered the art networking and if you disagree with them you are out of business whether you are a Congressman, writer or publisher. They control the monetary pathways allowing you to access your money through banks and Paypal, Patreon and so forth. Their final death note to all of us is shown in Amazon which controls most of the publishing and digital distribution. That’s right distribution. This is the final nail in our coffin is that they will limit your ability to distribute your book and collect any money. Of course, you can self-publish and print it including digital but you’ll lack the infrastructure of Amazon to distribute your book widely and make a lot of money. Google also owned by Jews and of course, Facebook will bury you so no one will find it.

    They will condemn everything as hate speech, antisemitic, and anything else they can call it and all the media will fall in line. You have only one thing left give them competition somehow and pull an Andy Warhol on them and go around them. If someone doesn’t then it’s over because they are never going to stop!

    • Replies: @m___
    , @Buck Ransom
  10. Wally says:

    Wow, Ron, wow!!
    A big man hug & kudos to you.

    You’re making a big difference.

    http://www.codoh.com

    recent:
    Auschwitz – Forensically Examined, By Cyrus Cox
    https://shop.codoh.com/book/494/508

    plus video clip:

    • Replies: @2stateshmustate
  11. anonymous[247] • Disclaimer says:

    The verdict of a trial where only the prosecution is given a voice cannot be trusted (E.g., a custody battle where only the mother’s case is presented). Peer review on the results of a clinical trial where only its proponents are allowed to publish is not science. A victory won on an uneven field giving your team a large advantage does not demonstrate your superiority at sport. And, a scientific theory on whose validity only its proponents are allowed to publish and speak cannot be taken as fact.

    The scientific method, whether in law, medicine, sport or science, requires that both sides have a voice, that they compete on equal footing, and that their megaphones be set at equal volume. When this scientific standard has not been applied, then the conclusions must be thrown in the garbage. Its findings are trash — worse than trash, for they provide fodder for deception and con artistry: the medicine probably snake oil, the verdict probably wrong and the theory probably false.

    The only way to personally ascertain the truth in a world where all of the established opinions voiced on a given topic in print and television have been vetted and filtered by partisans — as they are in our world on certain subjects — is to personally invest the time and resources to discover the truth for yourself (and hope that the crime scene has not been sufficiently sabotaged so as to make such an endeavor impossible). Even then, this is often a huge if not impossible undertaking for any individual (E.g., conducting a clinical trial).

    In light of the massive suppression of free expression around the Holocaust — the fact that in all Western countries it’s either illegal to question it, or doing so comes at huge social and financial risk, the only scientifically valid position to take is agnosticism. (That is, unless you are willing to invest the time to become a self-taught expert by reading through the huge published history, objectivity requires agnosticism. And, who’d platform you, if your well researched and substantiated conclusions deviated from the received narrative? Your platform will be a sidewalk and then a prison cell).

    More generally, one must apply this standard on every subject where scientific debate is heavily stifled: Agnosticism until and unless the debate is freed: until neither side fears to speak its mind. It’s the only scientifically valid position, barring a huge personal investment of time. If any theory wants to gain the consideration of the objective and scientifically minded, it must first subject itself to free and open debate. It cannot threaten them with financial or personal destruction. Did Galileo say: “The Earth moves, and if you disagree I will see you fired, bankrupt and imprisoned!”? No, that’s what the Church said to him. Is that not the telltale sign of a madman, jokester or con artist? Is that not exactly what the whole world is, in fact, being told?

    Also see this excellent essay.

  12. No doubt readers with other specialities have their own tales to tell.

    In my area, postwar China, the level of censorship and disinformation is either impressive or disheartening, depending on your mood.

    The Financial Times, for example, blocks comments employing statistics from multinational sources like BIS, OECD, and WTO if they contradict the newspaper’s narrative.

    The Disqus commenting platform (which reaches 100 million readers) blocks present alternative narratives about China. Even progressive sites like Naked Capitalism and Zero Hedge do the same. Do these latter do so because of conviction?

    When I asked a recently retired official about the motive for this behavior he responded, “Panic. They’ve found they can’t make money selling propaganda and they don’t know what else to do.”

  13. Anon[772] • Disclaimer says:

    This is scary stuff – using Black History month and “white nationalism” as pretexts for banning books critical of the secret police, the ADL. Sneaky, sneaky. Have you perhaps considered contacting the copyright holders of these works and offering to sell PDFs of their works through this website? Maybe a teaser, then $1 per download or something like that? Or maybe even they could make their works public domain and you could offer them electronically.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    • Replies: @m___
  14. jfk says: • Website

    Also banned on Amazon…

    A. I. Solzhenitsyn: 200 Years Together, about the Jews in Russian territories.

    https://www.docdroid.net/OdYUy5a/200-years-together.pdf

  15. jfk says: • Website

    And this is how they operate, by their own words and deeds, in the 21st century in America:

    https://electronicintifada.net/content/watch-film-israel-lobby-didnt-want-you-see/25876

  16. anon[160] • Disclaimer says:

    Over the last quarter-century, the public release of the Venona Decrypts has demonstrated that throughout most of the Franklin Roosevelt Administration and even afterward, the top levels of our national government were honeycombed with numerous spies and traitors deeply loyal to the Soviet Union rather than the United States.

    much like the Frank case, the Jews also denied denied denied that the Rosenbergs were guilty of spying

    its almost like they cannot admit any wrongdoing to the lowly cattle

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  17. Miro23 says:

    Amazon today possesses a near-total monopoly over Internet book sales, and if American society continues to allow it to ban serious works of scholarship on political or ideological grounds, our future intellectual freedom has already been lost.

    To fix this problem (and Jewish activism in general) it’s necessary for society to have a stronger countervailing power.

    The ADL and AIPAC aren’t going to be stopped by arguments about fair play, level playing fields, democratic rights and the Constitution. They are Mafia type organizations that use any kind of bribes, lies, smears or threats to further their interests.

    The question then seems to be, what form this countervailing power will take – there are different possibilities with different outcomes.

  18. m___ says:

    Case made, and well.

    There is something innate as to printed books, threading, inter-related research depend on openly available sources, the cluster as a whole. Effectively killing an argument by pulling a source as now done by Amazon is mortal to the whole of the cluster and cluster of authors.

    Now as for Ron, and pointing so outspokenly and knowledgeably to the phenomenon of long term generational effect, how come the lack of discussion on alternative venueways, the adherance and dependency on a Google analytics, Patreon, Cloudflare, WordPress to name a few. Hard to understand but as by design. Louis Farhakan does better.

  19. m___ says:

    @m___

    Correction: make that (Louis Farrakhan).

  20. Amazon has become much too influential. That needn’t be that bothersome, at least as long as free speech reigns. If not, there is a problem. – All ya experts out there: Is there a juridical answer to the problem of Amazon censorship?

    • Replies: @m___
    , @Wizard of Oz
  21. swamped says:

    “Although Prof. Toaff initially attempted to stand his ground in stubborn fashion, he soon took the same course as Galileo, and his apologies naturally became the basis of the always-unreliable Wikipedia entry on the topic.” And as if this isn’t bad enough, see the “always-unreliable Wikipedia”-which always claims it attempts to maintain a neutral point of view – entry on Ron Unz which uses ADL denunciations as its partial basis. Or the more ideological RationalWiki entry on The Unz Review which uses another hit piece by the loathsome ADL as its basis. Interestingly though, the Wikipedia solo entry on The Unz Review which was up until just recently & carried even more defamatory descriptions of its founder, has apparently been taken down.
    “Books may cost just a few dollars, but their potential impact is of a different order of weight and permanency.” And ADL’s despicable declamations may be of questionable permanency but sadly, they seem to carry unwarranted weight in many quarters.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  22. HZ says:

    The best we can do is to make the censors overstep their line. Because currently as a normal person you can’t even argue about it. Any discussion will have to end up in you having to list those books and since those happen to be far rightish your optics will suffer. Sure honest people will see past it but the general public will see you as the Nazi guy.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Wally
  23. Jake says:

    Why is Ron Unz better, smarter and braver and more honest, than at least 90% of America’s professed conservative politicians? Here is a perfect example: “Some critics have attacked this policy as a new form of “McCarthyism,” but this characterization seems based upon historical ignorance. Although the notorious junior senator from Wisconsin was an alcoholic prone to making reckless, unsubstantiated charges and therefore served as an extremely poor vessel for the movement he eventually came to symbolize, his accusations of massive Communist political subversion were absolutely correct and indeed somewhat understated.”

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @TKK
  24. onebornfree says: • Website

    Ron Unz says: “Amazon today possesses a near-total monopoly over Internet book sales, and if American society continues to allow it to ban serious works of scholarship on political or ideological grounds, our future intellectual freedom has already been lost.”

    Dear Ron, wake up! Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Google etc. are not private companies now, assuming any of them ever really were.

    Right from “the git go” Amazon received CIA seed money. It is basically the government staring right in your innocent little face and grinning, at you from behind a mask labelled “Amazon”. Its no different with the other companies I listed here [ and probably more besides ].

    The “private company” mask allows the government to pressure companies to do its bidding, or face termination or complete takeover.

    Hell, the internet itself is a D.A.R.P.A. creation!

    Welcome to Hitlers fascism US style, circa 2019. The Fourth Reich has indeed been initiated, as Jim Marrs detailed in his 2009 book: “The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America”, which, ironically, is still available [for now] at Amazon.

    So what are you going to do now, vote for some scumbag politician who “promises” to pass laws to “protect free speech on the internet”? Yeah, like that’s gonna work.

    Regards, onebornfree

  25. Jake says:

    “During the 1950s, any proposal to ban suspected Communists from making telephone calls, watching television, renting cars, or having bank accounts surely would have been universally ridiculed as utter lunacy. But in today’s America, entirely equivalent measures are steadily growing more frequent and more severe, with very little public opposition.”

    That’s because the Commissars today are Cultural Marxists. So the horrors against average Joes, against decent folks, that the Stalins, Trotskys, and Maos lived to enact are their guideposts and inspiration.

  26. fnn says:

    We have anti-trust laws and monopolies like Amazon, Google and Facebook should be broken up. I’m not a fan of Elizabeth Warren, but at least she’s brought this up. In the meantime, there should be demands for an Internet Bill of Rights. Unfortunately, the left is opposed to this and the right is heavily infected with Randian libertard ideology. This includes the Hindu Chief of Trump’s DOJ Anti-Trust Division.

  27. @obwandiyag

    WTF you bloviating dumbass did you even read his essay, he is putting forward the hypothesis that some Jewish group is behind this latest round of censorship plausible given the books which have been removed from Amazon.
    Small advise, read the fucking article before commenting.

  28. @onebornfree

    I know a little bit about Amazon and have not read about the connection to the CIA at their beginnings. However, once these companies got big, with lots of technology to invade privacy, do harm in other ways, and in general do the Feral Gov’t’s bidding, then that’s just what they’ll end up doing. I’m sure they got some good offers that they no coulda’ refused.

    You are very right that what I’ve been calling “crony capitalism”, hand-in-hand Feral-Gov/Big-Biz relations in which the laws are made by and for Big-Biz is indeed the defnition of Fascism. For most Americans “Fascism” is simply Nazism, with no thought about the economic system, and for the ctrl-left “Fascism” is just another meaningless perjorative term like “racist”.

    This works out great for the Commies, just as it did a century ago, as they can rail against today’s economic system, purposefully erroneously calling it “Capitalism”, in order to explain to us why we need to go Socialist and Communist, as this time, it will work out a whole lot better, I swear ta God. O’Cassional Cortex has been doing a bang-up job at this.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
  29. Mr. Unz, though I don’t always agree with you, you are a beacon of light by allowing those to publish otherwise banned truths (along with some Commie rubbish) that would not easily see the light of day otherwise, as you explain here.

    I appreciate your defense of Senator Joe McCarthy too. I will add here that Miss Ann Coulter came to his defense in one of her books close to a decade ago.

    I have not read this whole thing yet but will keep this tab open to read later today when I have more time. Thanks again. You are a real truth-seeker in the best sense.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  30. Anon545 says:

    “Books may cost just a few dollars, but their potential impact is of a different order of weight and permanency.”

    What Ray Bradbury already knew when he wrote “Fahrenheit 451”!

    Excellent article & thanks Ron Unz for the PDF links.

    Censorship and deliberate historical distortion goes even deeper when you consider the recent announcement that the Bible will be re-written to take out passages deemed anti-semitic, just as it was re-written and published as the Rainbow Bible for the acronym people with passages denouncing sodomy conveniently removed.

  31. m___ says:
    @niteranger

    An also very informative byte, your Andy Warhol adds to the historical perspective.

    …give them competition somehow and pull an Andy Warhol on them and go around them. If someone doesn’t then it’s over because they are never going to stop!

    And no-one to blame for it, but ourselves. It is plain common sense that creating middle-men, out of intellectual sloppiness, tolerating bottlenecks, not knowing or harnessing knowledgeable and loyal technicians, consumer behavior, not imposing favoritism based on ethics on hardware and software (Free Software Foundation, Stallman, a long time litterate advocate, comes to mind, a Julian Assange), one ends up sitting duck.

    The Jewish led assaults on cornering markets, is not outer worldly. A few simple techniques, mind patterns, secondary loyalties can make one his own proper Jew. Indeed it is a matter of not so much intelligence, but simple consequent behavior as to what the hunting grounds consist of. Out of the cocoon, gather context.

    The subterranean element, the tripled layers of navigation, the bet all sides of the International Jew, is not beyond Goyim comprehension. Enact on it, will take some balls, so drop that “camino de la mas minima resistencia” approach of a common consumer.

    Ron Unz, takes part, the betting all sides is on, the Patreon, the Google analytics, the Word-press, the Cloudflare are by design, not coincidence, nor ignorance. The whining has an explicit goal, dropping of steam in a sterilized manner. The valve of the pressure cooker. That is not how wars are won.

    There are times when you capitalize, these are times for Goyim to invest, rally, rethink loyalties, revision methods, get rid of their, to the core, putrid elites. Excellence by wealth is no excellence at all. Above all combine the public whining with some serious covert action. Measure up to the enemy.

    The Malinois approach.

  32. wayfarer says:

    “Stefan Molyneux Free Speech Event Under Attack!”

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
  33. Gordo says:

    Time to break up the monopolies, and examine the bank accounts of those politicians who oppose this measure.

  34. Another masterful entry in Ron Unz’ catalog of public service.

    It’s a pity that the overwhelming majority of sheeple are simply too stupid and/or prosperous/complacent to read and comprehend that everything they have been told is utter bullshit. It’s a terrifyingly minute percentage of our population capable of independent thought and analysis and among them an even smaller number willing to critically analyze cherished beliefs such as religious fairy tales handed down by their parents.

    I become ever more convinced that the only possible way out of this is an existential catastrophe fatal to all who refuse to see what is rather than that they wish to be. And even then, who among us is constitutionally able to admit let alone act accordingly in recognition that his own mother or child or wife is too enfeebled and contemptible to rationally warrant continued support and sustenance? We evolved into our current form via the brutalities of survival versus a Nature intent on our failure. How ironic that our own sentimentalities will undo eons of selective culling and ensure our extinction.

    The meek shall be interred in the earth.

  35. @obwandiyag

    Yeah, right. Communists are, or were, or whatever you are up to, about to take over the US.

    You are a tool.

    A Trolling Tool..

    • Agree: Harbinger
  36. Alden says:

    Thanks for mentioning Henry Wallace and his communist friends. Unlike you, however, I don’t believe Wallace was an innocent dupe. Nor do I believe Roosevelt & wife were innocent dupes of Harry Dexter White and the rest.

    We owe the power of the KKK and the northern labor unions at the summer of 44 Democrat party convention for dumping Wallace and putting in Truman as VP.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  37. @Michael Hoffman

    such considerations apparently no longer concern Mr. Bezos.

    Bezos is obviously controlled and corrupted, look at his fantastically lucrative contracts with FedGov and how he was given a slap by National Enquirer over his sexual peccadilloes as a warning against straying from the reservation of approved thought.

    • Replies: @Wally
  38. m___ says:
    @Anon

    …and offering to sell PDFs of their works through this website? Maybe a teaser, then $1 per download or something like that? Or maybe even they could make their works public domain and you could offer them electronically…

    Halt right there, turning a honey trap into real subversion, you Sir interfere with the experiment! Do not confuse having a stake, ambitioning a stake, and plain revolt. It is a delicate mind to muster and fade the limits. If the control knob is left unattended, the “free speech game” gets out of control.

  39. m___ says:
    @Stan d Mute

    We evolved into our current form via the brutalities of survival versus a Nature intent on our failure. How ironic that our own sentimentalities will undo eons of selective culling and ensure our extinction.

    Not “entitled” but yes, agree.

    One single layer, let alone a second, one must be an over achieving Ashkenazim to see.

  40. @anonymous

    Superb Essay thanks

    Of course, we’re not just looking for things we can’t say. We’re looking for things we can’t say that are true, or at least have enough chance of being true that the question should remain open. But many of the things people get in trouble for saying probably do make it over this second, lower threshold. No one gets in trouble for saying that 2 + 2 is 5, or that people in Pittsburgh are ten feet tall. Such obviously false statements might be treated as jokes, or at worst as evidence of insanity, but they are not likely to make anyone mad. The statements that make people mad are the ones they worry might be believed. I suspect the statements that make people maddest are those they worry might be true.

    That’s the dilemma for the ‘gas chambers with wooden doors’ crowd, they fear one day they will be drowned out by derisive laughter.

  41. @Lot

    About the only counterargument there is to Ron’s case against Amazon, but it doesn’t look so good at second glance. If Amazon wad 100 per cent owned by Bezos that it might be appropriate to say that he can define anti-Semitism as he likes and give effect to his dislike of it by not having anything to do with it. But as a monopolistic business, or at least one with overwhelming market dominance, should he have the right to limit the reach of free speech as he has? And as merely the controlling shareholder why should his take on what is unacceptable anti-Semitism be allowed to prevail?

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
    , @Wally
    , @Lot
  42. anon[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @HZ

    Sure honest people will see past it but the general public will see you as the Nazi guy.

    Think about how much money and effort Jews and their henchmen Anglo/Episcopalians have invested in the “Nazi” brand and its “Swastika” logo.

    Consider the heretical, unthinkably remote possibility that “Nazi” is just as fraudulent as the holocaust.

    Don’t feed the trolls, get to work at busting the brand.

    Sue the bastard Jews who lied about Nazis and the holocaust with at least one purpose of extorting vast sums of money.

    That right there is criminal behavior.

    Nick Sandmann

    Ilhan Omar

    • Replies: @Wally
  43. Much needed. Two niggles:

    (1) The bandwagon argument for high-level Soviet penetration is unconvincing when I look at the putative evidence. A carpet. A cryptonym that some guy marked up as so-and-so. All in transcripts released by the guys who have always been full of shit to the hairline. Did they ever find a reference to Agent Hiss in Soviet records? Last I heard, no. And they looked pretty hard. White was Lamb chop to Keynes’ Shari Lewis at Bretton Woods. Lamest Soviet agent ever.

    The fundamental worldview problem here is that researchers can’t tell the difference between communists and internationalists – and that’s entirely consistent with CIA doctrine, which obscured the distinction to justify domestic repression. Internationalists weren’t scared of Soviets, so they were persecuted. Evidence was selected and interpreted to implicate them. Nothing has changed. Internationalists aren’t scared of Russians or Iranians, so they are persecuted. Everybody you talk to with a Russian-sounding name is ‘close to Putin,’ Ukrainians, Kazakhs, Georgians, Israelis, it’s hilariously stupid.

    (2) Yes, the ADL, CIA’s favorite cutouts. And Amazon are their favorite censors. Again CIA pops up only in the comments. Be careful you don’t burn the illegal domestic agents and leave their handlers unscathed. That is Langley’s plan.

  44. onebornfree says: • Website
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Achmed E. Newman says:“This works out great for the Commies, just as it did a century ago, as they can rail against today’s economic system, purposefully erroneously calling it “Capitalism”, in order to explain to us why we need to go Socialist and Communist, as this time, it will work out a whole lot better, I swear ta God. O’Cassional Cortex has been doing a bang-up job at this.”

    Yes, the old “straw man” tactic- in this case, label fascism [what we have] as capitalism [ what we don’t have], and then call for “the opposite”, that is, even more government control than exists under fascist systems, aka full on communism! Makes total sense, not!

    “O’Cassional Cortex” ? Heck, it ain’t even occasional, as far as I can see. More like delusional. She’ll go far, I’m sure.

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Agree: Wally
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  45. m___ says:
    @Dieter kief

    Is there a juridical answer to the problem of Amazon censorship?

    Not a juridical one, that would be like carrying water to the sea. But yes a systemic one: end basing excellency and admiration into monetizing. Economic theoretics that include Nature and it’s resources, the long term, appreciating progress as to derivatives. Nothing less, or not too much can be done practically.

    We will all wind up vegans, since grass can be pushed to our controlling budgets as expensive as meat. To say, ‘it’ is everywhere, the system is overheating. Our poor elites, have nowhere to go but imagine, plunk their gains in furthering the thickness of the castle walls.

  46. @Reg Cæsar

    It’s old news that the early National Socialists were friendly with German Zionists

    It is old but hardly stale. You probably haven’t yet understood the simple concept that old doesn’t necessarily mean well known.

    It’s even news to most hasbara trolls.

  47. @Rational

    b. Boycott amazon.

    I second that. And not only for their censorship.

    Screw the ____s!

  48. @Dieter kief

    It might be worth watching it closely for false advertising and false representations but this would probably only allow some guerilla warfare against it.

  49. @Lot

    Amazon doesn’t want antisemitic business, good for them putting morality over profits.

    They’ll be putting morality over profits when they reject antigoy business as well.

    It is wonderful that our free country gives us such choice.

    Too bad Amazon limits our choices.

    Free? Don’t make me laugh.

    • Replies: @Lot
  50. @obwandiyag

    You fail to recognize the first rule of communism: establishing/defining the commune. Ironically, this mirrors Dr. Karl Lueger’s “I will decide who is a Jew” comment. The commune has its politburo, which decides what is best for the commune. The ADL is the politburo, and all other Jewish groups and their members, promoting the agenda are the commune. In that respect, the communists are, indeed, taking over the US.

    Not mentioned in this article was the fact that at the time the NSDAP was given its powers by the Reichstag, the German Communist Party (KPD) was the 3rd largest in the Reichstag, and Jews were heavily over-represented in it. The NSDAP losses in the November 1932 election came largely at the hands of the KPD which was its main competition. The fact that over 60% of the Reichstag was “socialist” or “communist” is always ignored. “Those who control the present…”

  51. If I was US American, I would ask, if these businesses are in fact utility companies, that have to be regulated?

    Another question I would ask, if these US companies, that obviously make their own rules, in fact circumvent and ignore the US constitution and its amendments, and if these US based companies have assumed more power than the servants of the US people, the
    US government?

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  52. @swamped

    There are probably quite a few jurisdictions in the world where Ron could sue for defamation as a result of those Wikipedia and RationalWiki articles containing slurs against him. Time for lawfare perhaps.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  53. @onebornfree

    label fascism [what we have] as capitalism [ what we don’t have]

    You are wrong. The fascist movement empowered the workers through higher employment standards and worker councils with teeth. Mussolini was the first to introduce universal health care. Both are totally absent in the US.
    Capitalism, like communism is designed to concentrate wealth in the hands of the elite. The question is what is the commune? In the US, the capitalist banking system is part of the commune.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  54. @onebornfree

    Have you evidence about the CIA seed money in Amazon or is that just a private speculation?

    Do you really think Amazon feels under any pressure from the possibility of federal government takeover or close down,?

  55. @Alden

    Are you seriously suggesting that the Roosevelts looked favourably on Soviet communism as an ideology and practice to be emulated and fostered? That seems to be what you are implying. If so, on what evidence?

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
    , @Alden
  56. @wayfarer

    @ 11:47 Stefan says: “The enemy they are facing [afraid of] is rational discourse.”

    E Michael Jones,
    below, @ 10 min: Hegel: The cunning of reason — God is in charge of history, and the power of God is such that good can come out of evil.

    Two outcomes of Napoleon’s conquest of Germany:
    -unification of the German nation
    -emancipation of the Jews

    Jews are the anti-Logos: “Jew” is the name of those who rejected Jesus, Logos; those who rejected reason, the order of the universe.

    [Anyone who does not see the Jewish hand in the Anti fa puppet is willfully blind]

    • Replies: @wayfarer
  57. Anon[300] • Disclaimer says:

    Ron, I am actually concerned that the powerful censors will get the Unz Review shut down. I assume that the ADL, etc. is already harassing you and attempting to sabotage your publishing of information.

    I wish I could interest more of my fellow dumb Americans in The Unz Review. Has the web traffic increased?

  58. @Rational

    Proud to have closed my Amazon account some years back. No chance reopening that account.

  59. Jewry is in a race against time to destroy incriminating media before enough goyim figure out what’s going on and the gefilte fish hits the fan as never before. These are the highest stakes Jewry has ever played for. Fingers crossed that truth wins the day.

  60. Although Shahak’s books are quite short, they contain such a density of astonishing material, it would take many, many thousands of words to begin to summarize them.

    At the risk of sounding like a sycophant, I have a similar opinion of the present superb piece of work.

    “Yes!” to all!

    RU, how do you do it?

  61. @Wizard of Oz

    Trillions of dollars of government money props up tech*. Nearly all tech firms are one or more degrees of separation from government contracting work, especially, “supporting the warfighter” (as the propaganda goes). From my previous work I know board members of tech/SV companies have TS security clearances. This surprised me at first. Then I saw CEO’s of major financial institutions had government security clearances. It’s order of magnitude worse than Three Days of the Condor.

    I don’t buy into conspiracy theories. They are clumsy, speculative, and highly flawed and thus serve only to make people accept the official narrative. But I don’t buy into conspiracies because they are totally unnecessary when you have a fully-rigged system like we have.

    *Almost all of it through secret Deep State/Military Security Industrial Complex budgets which no will ever know about.

  62. Anon[206] • Disclaimer says:

    Here is the photo Unz should have led with …

    That is more than censorship, that is full-on Orwellian mind control. See https://www.quora.com/Are-the-thought-crime-laws-of-the-type-used-in-Germany-to-imprison-Holocaust-deniers-for-example-unjust-and-taking-things-too-far

    Something crashed on to the bed behind Winston’s back. The head of a ladder had been thrust through the window and had burst in the frame. Someone was climbing through the window. There was a stampede of boots up the stairs. The room was full of solid men in black uniforms, with ironshod boots on their feet and truncheons in their hands.

  63. Just more alarming evidence of the Jew World Order which, in case you haven’t noticed, is very close to being perfected.

  64. @anonymous

    More generally, one must apply this standard on every subject where scientific debate is heavily stifled:

    Very true, but the kicker is that one must recognize when scientific debate is occurring and when it is not; and it almost never is. So, while agnosticism is often valid, skepticism is fundamental.

  65. Anon[190] • Disclaimer says:

    OT

    BUG REPORT

    Ron, can you please fix the bug on the Comments page where the comments are clipped after April 2018 when By Author is selected …

    … or at least respond to this and let me know that you don’t have time for it, so I can stop bugging you about it?

  66. Since my first visit to Unz.com, my education on Judaism’s rituals grew exponentially. Religion had never really been my cup of tea, having been an equal opportunity repudiator of all organized religion for much of my adult life. When I thought that religions worked against rational thought, I could never have imagined the evil that was such a great component of the Jewish faith as has been described here. Simply unfathomable. But because of it, it became easier to comprehend the behavior of citizens of the Zionist state towards the goyim in general and Palestinians in particular. The secretive nature of such rituals also became clearer. Evil is as evil does. The disturbing aspect is how the West with its history and traditions of enlightenment should be held captive by Jewish groups whose sole interest is self-aggrandizement and advancement of the interests of Israel and fuck everyone else.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  67. @Jake

    …[McCarthy’s] accusations of massive Communist political subversion were absolutely correct and indeed somewhat understated.”

    I liked that especially well, and this too.:

    Today’s ritualistic denunciations of McCarthyism are made by ignorant journalists (sic) who derive their understanding of the past from misleading Hollywood dramas rather than the meticulously researched volumes produced by leading academic scholars…

  68. @onebornfree

    Welcome to Hitlers fascism US style…

    Are you the guy who gets peeved every time someone mentions “Jews” as naughty kids? Of course they’re all innocent and besides, “dem nasty Nazis.”

    Drop it already.

    No regards,

    JS

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
  69. @Anon

    Here’s the problem with Orwell. He was a sycophantic semitophile atheist who excoriated English writers like G.K. Chesterton for less-than-flattering portrayals of Jews in their fiction works. Orwell proudly stated that Chesterton would not be allowed to be published in the Britain of Orwell’s day (generation subsequent to Chesterton) because of Chesterton’s “anti-semitism” (i.e., less-than-flattering portrayal of Jews).

    Be careful about buying into a fiction work by a guy like Orwell and his book 1984, which has the imprimatur of public education and had a Hollywood film based on it.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Was_Thursday

    • Troll: Che Guava
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Che Guava
  70. @Stan d Mute

    One fatal catastrophe that seems imminent would be failure of the banking system.
    That should cull some sheeple. But will it right the ship?

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  71. oh man! must I slog through another massive Unz missive to get to what is the clear reality in all this.’.a reality we know already:

    that the clear interest of the Khazars is to lock down society, channel it it in ways that make for the perpetuity of the Khazar empire, and how they are going about it in this particular but relative area of society.

    I know what the Khazars want and are going to try to do to get it..and likely succeed at it because of all this focus and talk by us all, who should be paying attention to the Khazars and acting to stop them doing whatever they think they must do in society. I need to know their sophistication and whether I can cope with it, defend it, stop it or correct it, as it goes

    I am not shocked or bothered by what amazon does or when it does it..as if banning black books in black history month is unusual. I imagine if the Khazars perceive a threat to their interest they wil act regardless, at any time and place it may be necessary for them to do so. they will do any thing they dam well please anytime they deem their interest to be at risk

    I am tired of all this talk, all this analysis, while the Khazars proceed anyway, doing freely, unimpeded, all they must do to maintain and extend their domination of planet earth.

    I mean I was originally impressed by Unz’s Intellect but, that is not an end in itself. the point and a new better start would be the end of Khazar domination and the start cooperative society in which ownership is defused among the people by means and ways they devise to ensure their hands control the social power and keep it that way. popular social control in which all participate and has a vested interest in maintaining and developing to the max would ensure respect for all, at all times

    I am fed up wallowing in all of this talk..Khazar this that and the other..as if they are impregnable, so powerful they are outside time and nature and forever, above us now and will always be.

    nothing at all goes that way..all that is nature affects them too , just like us, making them human, biological and subject to natural imperatives just like the rest of us. if they constitute a collective social problem for the rest of us we are supposed to be able to deal with that problem, and them too..to stop the problem, change it, correct it and make a better situation

    • Troll: utu
  72. Che Guava says:

    Dear Mr. Unz.

    I have no idea (of course three or four ideas) of how the initial vowel in your surname is correctly pronounced. Have wondered.

  73. @Lot

    Now there’s a real Orwellian argument for censorship. “Ignorance is power.”

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  74. @Wizard of Oz

    Are you seriously suggesting that the Roosevelts looked favourably on Soviet communism as an ideology and practice to be emulated and fostered?

    ironically, a response to your question can be found and communicated across the waves and continents via Amazon.

    FDR by Jean Edward Smith

    Passages on pages 340 – 343 +- suggest a more nuanced version of FDR’s attitude toward “Soviet communism:”
    By June, 1933, FDR had pulled USA out of the London Economic Conference, and recognized USSR and established the beginnings of economic relations with Communist Russia:

    a. FDR was persuaded, or persuaded himself, that “Bolshevism was no longer a threat;”
    b. FDR was firmly committed to economic exchange, with Soviet Russia, its “communist ideology” be damned;
    c. Financial interests who had supported his rise to the presidency had strong interests in strengthening relations with Soviet Russia: these interests, predominantly Jewish, sought to collect moneys and assets still in Russia, and were determined to achieve the right of Jewish people to travel freely between USA and USSR;
    d. US State Department was opposed to FDR’s intentions, so FDR ignored them; or, more exactly, worked behind their backs, appointing his ever-present Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, JR, to negotiate with his Russian counterpart. Morgenthau’s chief assistant at Treasury was Harry Dexter White, now (perhaps even then) known to be a Communist agent.

  75. I hope I don’t cause the book to be banned by Amazon, but Chapter 17 of E. Michael Jones’s massive “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit: And its Impact on World History” https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Revolutionary-Spirit-Impact-History/dp/0929891074/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2TWW974AUGXCM&keywords=the+jewish+revolutionary+spirit+by+e.+michael+jones&qid=1552318368&s=books&sprefix=e.+michael+jones+the+je%2Caps%2C141&sr=1-1-catcorr is devoted to the Leo Frank trial, and Jones also concludes, like Unz, that Frank was guilty.

  76. Indeed, books can cause a strong impression. This is the case of a book like the book by Lance deHaven-Smith about conspiracy theories. I heard about it for the first time here and some time ago I decided to read it and was astonished by the book (by the way, it’s not a book for a general public as it talks a lot about the work of philosophers, discusses conceptual matters and so on). I discovered this web site through links in antiwar.com. Without them I would probably never have discovered it, even if I occasionally had seen a link to an article here. I discovered antiwar and counterpunch years ago through links in the forum of The Guardian. At that time discussions in the internet had barely begun and you could discuss more or less freely in the Guardian. But with time this changed. Censure became active. Some times you even didn’t have any idea why something was deleted, or you knew but you also knew that the reason for the deletion was completely arbitrary. I could mention some odd cases that I still remember. Very soon posts with links were often deleted. Apparently they didn’t want people to know that antiwar and so on existed. So, I was conditioned to write without giving links. Der Spiegel also censures a lot of things. Once I wrote them about this which prompted a funny exchange of emails. Now it seems that they are coming for the books.

    The general rule of the media seems to be that almost anything can be deleted. There is an experiment with dogs. There were two lights, one a round light and the other a square light. When the square light was on the dogs knew that they wouldn’t get food that day. This was not very pleasant, but the dogs could live with this situation. But one day scientists begun making the square light a bit more round and give or not give food by chance. What happened? The dogs became crazy and never recovered. I think that is what they do with deletions. You never know what you can write or not besides a few things you know you should say and a few things you know you shoudn’t definitively say.

  77. @jacques sheete

    People who employ, as an all-around epithet and conversation wet blanket, phrases like “Hitler fascism” should summon in the listener’s / reader’s mind’s eye the image of the town idiot, wearing a Dunce cap.

    They do not have a clue what they are talking about.

    They are in the nosebleed seats regurgitating the phrases the cheerleaders on the field shout through their megaphones (recall that George Bush was a cheerleader in his prep school and at Yale; Reagan, Eisenhower, and FDR were also high school or college cheerleaders. What a coincidence. https://www.flocheer.com/articles/5067734-4-us-presidents-you-didnt-know-were-cheerleaders )

    Fascism was an Italian political movement, conceptualized by Benito Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile;
    http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/mussolini.htm
    As you read it — assuming you are capable of reading English — notice how Italian Fascism relies on principles of Roman Catholicism that define and identify the Italian people and culture.

    In comparison, Adolf Hitler / National Socialism was constructed on principles that reflected German Volk culture and heritage and the way that Christianity evolved in- and influenced the culture of Germany. Notice the distinction: Germany is not Italy; German cultural legacy is different from Italian cultural legacy — linked, interrelated, but different.

    US media has so addled the American brain that language is completely scrambled. Confucius never achieved his goal of reforming the language, but he at least established truthfulness and precision in communication as a first principle.

    It would be a good start if Americans, or at least Unz Forum participants, adopted that first principle.
    Shout it through a megaphone, if you must.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  78. Jett Rucker says: • Website

    The foxes are, without the slightest doubt, fully in charge of our henhouse.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  79. Jett Rucker says: • Website
    @wayfarer

    This video doesn’t/won’t load or display on my computer.

  80. Anon[206] • Disclaimer says:
    @Abundans Cautela Non Nocet

    Nobody is perfect, Orwell included, and I wasn’t aware of his philosemitism. My gripe with him is that he wrote about mind control and the control of history while missing the most preposterous hoax in the history of the human race, the holohoax. But, the quotes ! A genius … the guy had absolutely remarkable insight into the functioning of society and IMO ‘1984’ is absolutely essential reading …..

    He who controls the past controls the future, and he who controls the present controls the past

    and then the chosen lie would pass into the permanent records and become truth… Sometimes he talked to her of the Records Department and the impudent forgeries that he committed there. Such things did not appear to horrify her. She did not feel the abyss opening beneath her feet at the thought of lies becoming truths.

    Proles and animals are free

    Crimestop –

    a stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought . . . and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.”

    This last quote is remarkable in it’s description of a phenomena I’ve witnessed many timea when attempting to discuss the holohoax.

  81. @ben sampson

    I am tired of all this talk…

    I am fed up wallowing in all of this talk…

    Well I’m sure I’m not the only one tired of your superiority signalling in 439 words, more or less. Why not cut to the chase? What’re your recommendations?

    • Replies: @mh505
  82. wayfarer says:
    @Grace Poole

    Was unaware of E. Michael Jones, thanks for sharing.
    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Michael_Jones

    “Destruction of Nations and Empire.”

    • Replies: @Anon
  83. Jett Rucker says: • Website
    @Michael Hoffman

    Bezos is well bought and paid for.

    Question: who could so buy a billionaire?

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  84. @Grace Poole

    …ironically, a response to your question can be found and communicated across the waves and continents via Amazon.

    Unfortunately that would take some intelligence, time, motivation and effort, at a bare minimum, to say nothing about questioning one’s own beliefs and heaven forbid, the prevailing mythology.

  85. @ben sampson

    I am fed up wallowing in all of this talk..

    And yet here you are, consuming however-many of Ron Unz’s electronic pulses 400 words requires, to tell the world how tiresome you find reading Ron Unz’s forum, which you just, presumably, read.

    Someone once said “The sign of genius is the ability to hold two competing ideas at the same time without going insane.”

    You appear to have crossed that barrier.

  86. People resort to censorship when they run out of arguments. So do institutions.

  87. @Ralph B. Seymour

    But will it right the ship?

    Nothing will ever right the good ship,”Jake.” It’s full of pre-compost to the gunnels.

    • Agree: Liza
  88. these pages are a showcase for Mr Unz’s intellect..and for all us wannabes to flash our own intellects arguing profusely back and forth week after week, month after month and year, to the extent that Mr Unz now boasts a higher readership and no doubt a larger and growing commentariat and punditocracy that all his competition as alternative news and views

    there is no hint of or impetuous toward action, no bent or lean or suggestion to same: no ideas of how to correct the issues discussed..as if somehow it would be a sin to suggest correction in these parts..so much so I fear the presentation of such ideas by a commentator here would indeed be revolutionary

    this is a capitalist publication, published for talk and profit-an end in itself. there is really no way out to be found here..a way out ends at least in theory, the reason and purpose for a publication like this anyway

    • Replies: @Anon
  89. Che Guava says:
    @Abundans Cautela Non Nocet

    I will add, there is no Hollywood film, there is a Brit. production, I want to see it, never have, have for many years, and it seems to have been banned for a long time. I have only every seen stills.

    In or near the year 1984, there was a remake, parts OK, but with a an ugly pop-culture association (Annie Lennox, I swear that she resembles a crow with a hurt mouth).

    However, the music of dykie Annie and her friend Dave was was not there.

    I would repeat myself, Terry Gilliam did a much better version of the theme with Brazil.

  90. m___ says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    As a rule Jew mongering is on all sides, always, everywhere. One can alter this paradigm in different ways.

    Jew = Jewish thirst for power = moneyed elites thirst for power = innate to power

    Jew = money && political elites = power elites = corrupted, core rotten WASP elites

    Everywhere = global = China = Russia = US = etc.

    There is a hundred more variants to the above ones. We need a clear concise vocabulary to get somewhere. After all the variants as to the variables might be many, but human concepts are rather binary and consist of few variables. Too few often to make sense, but that is because the limits of our “deux chevaux” processor and the echo box of our short term memory.

    Yes, as always bets were placed on the Nazis by all parties, as always is the case, as today in our cherished US, to which we think to be a considered party.

  91. @Curmudgeon

    You can take your universal (meaning GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED) health care and insert it right back where you got your nutty ideas from. What is it with you Commies that you just can’t understand that people like to be left alone?

    Though the technology hasn’t caught up 100% yet, I was pretty impressed with the Chinese Free-Market-oriented health care – read Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and a postscript,

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  92. @David Martin

    It is wonderful

    It’s pretty risible that he chose that word. It has a meaning that is more appropriate than Old Witless could ever imagine.

  93. @Jett Rucker

    The foxes are, without the slightest doubt, fully in charge of our henhouse.

    Yeah, except that though “our” place is quite niffy, it ain’t no henhouse and them ain’t no foxes!

  94. Che Guava says:
    @Anon

    You reply as ‘anon’, you can only expect replies fron idiots.

  95. Anon[206] • Disclaimer says:
    @wayfarer

    Wow. What a great interview. I am a big EMJ fan, but the first 15 minutes of the ‘Destruction of Nations’ vid is slightly incredible, a great overview. See also ….

  96. Anonymous[361] • Disclaimer says:

    The NOI also believes that all white people on Earth are descended from a scence experiment carried out by a man named Yakoob 9000 years ago on the island of Patmos. So.. credibility?

  97. Zumbuddi says:
    @Jett Rucker

    Trump vs Omar are evidence: it’s easier to buy a billionaire than someone who has little.
    “Freedom’s just another word for nothi g left to lose”

  98. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    Banazon

  99. Anon[206] • Disclaimer says:
    @ben sampson

    The role of the intellectual is to analyze and explain. Unfortunately practically every academic and every intellectual not only in the US but worldwide has somehow been co-opted into the Zionist fantasy that constitutes the reality of our public mind today.

    And in that regard this site represents a real and singular breakthrough on the ‘left’ side of the political spectrum.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
    , @utu
  100. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    These anonymous black research studies prepared under the auspices of the Nation of Islam are alone among serious historical texts now banned by Amazon.

    “are alone”? did you not mean “are not alone”?

    [Typo fixed.]

  101. Che Guava says:
    @David Martin

    I will add, there is no Hollywood film, there is a Brit. production, I want to see it, never have, have for many years, and it seems to have been banned for a long time. I have only every seen stills.

    In or near the year 1984, there was a remake, parts OK, but with a an ugly pop-culture association (Annie Lennox, I swear that she resembles a crow with a hurt mouth).

    However, the music of dykie Annie and her friend Dave was was not there.

    I would repeat myself, Terry Gilliam did a much better version of the theme with Brazil.

  102. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    All of these almost unprecedented Amazon book bannings occurred just in the last couple of weeks, and unless they are soon reversed, they will surely become just the first of many.

    There you are, Ron, a great commercial opportunity: Banned Books from Nile.com. You should be able to whip up the software in a week or two and you can issue me a few shares for the idea when you go public.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Wizard of Oz
  103. it is time to break up all corporations everywhere in the world. america should be ready to lead in this direction: to smash corporations and at the same time end the owner/worker relation by transferring all business activity to worker co-operatives.

    all manufacturing and commercial activity must be handed over/or sold into co-operative activity in which all who work must also own the business entity the work in. there must be no individual owner/ownership not engaged in the productive activity.

    individual ownership, away from but profiting from the work of others, as a social viability has lost its efficacy and is now counterproductive..and must be eliminated

    and as with corporative ownership the government bureaucracy itself must also be eliminated, or reduced its barest minimum.. as a monster structural consistency, and the service it is now engaged in providing also sold into co-operative activity where feasible, and otherwise subsumed into wider services that must be carried out and worked ultimately into generally co-operative activity.

    Banking is an urgent service that must be immediately farmed into cooperative activity. all Banking must be organized into smaller entities to hande regular and routine banking services. as general business is reorganized into co-operative activity Big Banking would be of no necessity at all so it to can all be broken up and made co-operative.

    and with this particular change suddenly all debt/usury would disappear from the economy..worker/owners, absent the individual owner, would be able to pay themselves accordingly, obviating all need for personal debt.

    also governments would suddenly be free of predatory and parasitic banking cartels that make the people pay interest on the use of their own money. at once massive government debt disappears, along with inflation and programs of economic austerity.

    AND WITH PARTICULAR RELEVANCE TO THIS THREAD, THE AMAZON CORPORATION WOULD DISAPPEAR, AND ALONG WITH AMAZON ITS CENSORSHIP OF BLACK LITERATURE AND HISTORY AS WELL… AND ANY OTHER CENSORSHIP IT IS ALSO ENGAGED IN AT THIS TIME.

    AND ALONG WITH THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE BANKING CARTELS, AMAZON AND ALL OTHER CORPORATIONS INCLUDING INTERNET MONOPOLY CONTROL CORPORATIONS, WOULD GO THE KHAZAR POWER IN THE WORLD, FREEING UP SUCH AS RON UNZ TO DEDICATE AND ALLOCATE THEIR PRODIGIOUS INTELLECTUAL POWER TO PURSUITS MORE IN LINE WITH THE PRACTICAL NEEDS OF HUMANITY

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  104. ariadna says:

    Yet another well-researched, impeccably argued and superbly written article by Ron Unz, which makes me suspect him of suffering from ban envy.

  105. Wally says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    said:
    “turned the party over to the psychotic faggot with the mustache”

    Clearly you mean the man for which the claims of his impossible “holocaust” cannot be proven, in fact have been easily and thoroughly debunked.

    No wonder Zionists like you demand laws against free speech.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  106. Wally says:
    @Rational

    recommended:
    The Day Amazon Murdered History, By Germar Rudolf : https://codoh.com/library/document/5330/?lang=en
    exc.: “Amazon banned more than 100 books with dissenting viewpoints on the Holocaust, after having been pressured by Jewish lobby groups for years to do so.
    This documentary reveals how revisionist publications explaining ground-breaking archival and forensic research results had become so powerfully convincing over the years that the powers that be resorted to what is obviously a dirty false-flag operation in order to get these books banned from the biggest book retailer for good. Watch it and be amazed and appalled…”

    The Many Beds Amazon Shares with the Government : https://codoh.com/library/document/4323/?lang=en

    much more: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=amazon
    Only lies require censorship.
    http://www.codoh.com

  107. @Wizard of Oz

    The Government, through its Post Office is enabling the suppression of freedom of the press.

    By subsidizing it, it is encouraging it.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  108. Wally says:
    @Stan d Mute

    said:
    ” look at his fantastically lucrative contracts with FedGov”

    But doesn’t receipt of taxpayers money require that the 1st amendment be followed?

  109. …throughout most of the Franklin Roosevelt Administration and even afterward, the top levels of our national government were honeycombed with numerous spies and traitors deeply loyal to the Soviet Union…

    In fact, just a few years before Sen. McCarthy burst upon the national scene, control of our federal government was nearly seized by agents of Stalin … And although Wallace himself was not disloyal, his top advisors were mostly Communist agents.

    C’mon, Ron. These second two paragraphs are incredibly long-winded and lazy. A list of names and actual percentage of “the top levels of our national government” that were spies would be cool if that information actually exists.

    “Honeycombed” and “control nearly seized” is breathless hysteria.

    You did say “meticulously researched” so I’m assuming you have something of substance.

  110. @Che Guava

    You reply as ‘anon’, you can only expect replies fron idiots.

    I resent that. Learn your terms!

    Idiot (IQ of 0–25)
    Imbecile (IQ of 26–50)
    Moron (IQ of 51–70)

    It took me years of painstaking study of test-taking books to raise my level to that of imbecile. And one day, after many more years of study, I hope to be a moron. So there. I accept your apology in advance.

  111. Rurik says:

    Amazing article.

    Just more proof that intelligence, in and of itself, is worthless without the guts to use it.

    For intelligence to be of any merit, it has to be bound with integrity and character.

    Here we have all three, and more. We have a genuine interest in truth. Something I couldn’t say about 99% of all clergy, media, academia and obviously politicians/government.

    All they care about is the steady flow of slop in the $lop trough. Truth and justice be damned.

    Bravo Mr. Unz, on yet another masterpiece of courageous journalism. A field nearly bereft of honesty or integrity of any sort. Your efforts don’t just edify and inform, they also rouse a hope for that most debauched of crafts; the academic / writer / philosopher / scholar.

    Kudos and thank you.

    • Agree: jacques sheete
  112. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    And the fact that Bezos receives taxpayer money via federal contracts should mandate that free speech be allowed.

  113. Wally says:
    @HZ

    “but the general public will see you as the Nazi guy.”

    But for how long?

    Things change slowly until they quickly change.

    Besides, at this point in his life I don’t think Ron, excuse me, gives a fuck.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    http://www.codoh.com

  114. Wally says:
    @onebornfree

    “Welcome to Hitlers fascism US style, circa 2019. The Fourth Reich has indeed been initiated, as Jim Marrs detailed in his 2009 book: “The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America”, which, ironically, is still available [for now] at Amazon.”

    You certainly mean the Third Reich for which there is no proof that they killed 6,000,000 Jews, 5,000,000 others, or had homicidal ‘gas chambers’, and whose domestic policies were no different, and often more liberal than other countries at the time.
    I hope that helps.

  115. @Anon

    True! but where do we go from here..what to do about Amazon?
    that too must be answered in the breakthrough this site has achieved. and no only answered but actively indicate movement towards solving Amazon

    I say break up the corporations..and as government/the political parties, co-opted by the financial powers that doe not see their way clear to represent the peoples real interest then it is incumbent upon the people to move to represent themselves by action and in action to solve such as amazon and far far more than just Amazon in the same vein

    the system has run its useful course and must be revolutionized…in the process all the corporations must be broken up, the structure by and through which the minority Khazar power is exercised destroyed and changed into one that represents the popular interest and will

    it is my contention that the people must go out and take down the current system and create as they go the social organizing and governing forms and instruments they find most suitable to effect their collective interest, the people must go out and create and govern. the people must ignore the political parties for the political parties are the homes of the reaction, the counter revolution that will take away from the people any revolution they make

    the people must not only make the revolution but carry it through and govern it themselves, and in the process eliminate all basis for politics by political parties as we know it. the representation must be grass roots and creative and permanently susceptible to change as society goes..a form of permanent revolution.. for if the people find that they have been wrong here or there they must be able to change and correct at will.

    there will be no written constitutions..or if they are written they will be written in this way..susceptible to permanent change.

    all possibilities for social democracy lie in the popular interest, not in minority social control. what lives in minority social control is dictatorship, Brave New Worlds of scientific social control that enslaves the majority to make safe dictatorships of the minority

    what about such discussion to in the left ‘breakthrough’ in this monolithic atmosphere of right wing capitalist fascism?

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  116. Ron Unz says:
    @Johnny Rico

    …throughout most of the Franklin Roosevelt Administration and even afterward, the top levels of our national government were honeycombed with numerous spies and traitors deeply loyal to the Soviet Union…

    In fact, just a few years before Sen. McCarthy burst upon the national scene, control of our federal government was nearly seized by agents of Stalin … And although Wallace himself was not disloyal, his top advisors were mostly Communist agents.

    C’mon, Ron. These second two paragraphs are incredibly long-winded and lazy. A list of names and actual percentage of “the top levels of our national government” that were spies would be cool if that information actually exists.

    “Honeycombed” and “control nearly seized” is breathless hysteria.

    You did say “meticulously researched” so I’m assuming you have something of substance.

    Well, sure, I specifically referenced and linked the numerous and highly-regarded Venona books by Haynes and Klehr, of which I’ve read three or four, while glancing over a couple of others, including by different researchers.

    https://www.amazon.com/John-Earl-Haynes/e/B000APU6RW/

    I also linked to a long piece from 1995 by an NYT editor, in which he grudgingly admitted that Communist spies had heavily infested the top of our national government during that period despite a half-century of pooh-poohing by the NYT and every other MSM outlet.

    • Agree: Jett Rucker
    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
    , @Cowboy
  117. Wally says:
    @Lot

    Except that Amazon is not a truly private business since it accepts US taxpayers money via federal contracts.

    What “choice” did US taxpayers have when their money was / is given to Amazon?

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  118. Harbinger says:
    @obwandiyag

    Oh boy…..

    I strongly suggest you pick up the Communist Manifesto and read it, especially the tenets. When you have and look at not just American society, but western society you will see that it’s not a case of “Communists are, or were, or whatever you are up to, about to take over the US” but they ALREADY have and if you still can’t see this then you are clearly unable to see reality.

    Russia was simply the testbed for communism. It was the rat, in the lab.
    Why not have a watch of this excellent G.Edward Griffin interview with Norman Dodd on Tax Exempt Foundations and listen to clear proof of what banks are really up to?

    Maybe one day, you’ll actually wake up to see that bankers want nothing more than a communist state because all loans are paid. Why? Well through their control of the government, who control the police, you either pay up or end up dragged from your house, interrogated, thrown into a cell, a gulag or worse, shot.

    If anyone, today truly thinks that Communism was a one off reality in Russia, China and other parts of the world then they’re fools. Judaism IS Communism as Rabbi Stephen Wise stated back in the last century and considering that Jews run the world, it’s only a matter of time before the horrors of communism are fully unleashed, not only in the USA but the rest of Europe. And ironically, they will as long as there are people like you denying the blatant reality of it happening again.

    I don’t know about people like you. Truly I don’t. What are you waiting for, affirmation of a communist party running for power? Every, single politician, in positions of power, in the west is a communist. They are puppets of the bankers, Jews that is and happily do their bidding even though it means the obliteration of their nation and a living hell for their people in the future. However, the material rewards are simply too good to ignore and this is why they become the treasonous sycophants that they are, happily lying daily to bring about the world, communist, state.

  119. I can’t believe it. Somebody defending McCarthyism in this day and age. And in an article opposing censorship no less. Total and utter cognitive dissonance. Two different things out of both sides of the mouth. Absurd. Ridiculous. Unbelievable.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Bill Jones
  120. @Che Guava

    I was using the term Hollywood in a general sense. And I would consider John Hurt a Hollywood actor. The 1956 version featuring American actors playing Winston and Julia and distributed by Columbia Pictures in Hollywood could be considered Hollywood.
    The Guardian refers to a possible new project by Ron Howard as a Hollywood remake.

    Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four forecast for Hollywood remake

    An American consortium that includes director Ron Howard is set to make a new film of George Orwell’s highly influential novel

  121. Jett Rucker says: • Website

    I’ve got a great idea for a game! Let’s bet on the next books Amazon will drop from its ever-shrinking trove of offerings.
    My own nomination is the half-dozen or more titles (e.g., Blood in the Water) that expose the well-covered-up 1967 attempt by Israeli warplanes to sink the US naval vessel Liberty. One book on the subject is written by a Jewish US Navy lawyer who used to fly US Navy aircraft titled The Liberty Incident. In that it argues that the whole thing was just an unfortunate mistake, it alone will survive this purge.
    Any other nominations? Anyone doubt the books I mentioned will be banned, sooner rather than later?

  122. Wally says:
    @anon

    And notice that no one here is even trying to debate the merits of the impossible “holocaust” narrative. Ron has thrown down the gauntlet with his challenge in his article above:

    Although I am hardly an expert, it seemed to me that there was an enormous amount of persuasive evidence that the Holocaust is indeed substantially fraudulent, and quite possibly, almost entirely so. Those interested in considering my reasoning are welcome to do so and decide for themselves.

    but we read nothing to take him on, and if I may, myself.
    Cheers.
    http://www.codoh.com

    Holocaust Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos: http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

    • Agree: Jett Rucker
  123. @David Martin

    EMJ’s 1200-page TJRS can be found in pdf and djvu formats on Library Genesis and other places on the internet. I ordered his Barren Metal and Slaughter of Our Cities through Amazon. These are relatively mild compared to his other books. If I wanted a book but it was really controversial like the book Ron Unz refers to, I would do everything within my power not to order it or have record of purchasing it. And I’m a nobody without a reputation and high position to worry about.

    • Troll: utu, Felix Culpa
    • Replies: @m___
  124. Wally says:
    @obwandiyag

    Except that McCarthy, while a bit rough around the edges, was quite right.

    Indeed, your cognitive dissonance hurts don’t it?

    But alas, Communists never have liked facts.

  125. Blake says:

    Transparency is always good

  126. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    For the immediate future, the big question is which way will the battle for control of information go?

    Will Google/Facebook/NSA/the Teachers’ Federation/the Communists in academic administration/the corporate media and entertainments industry united in support of the Fascist New World Ordure, and yes, the ADL, achieve full-spectrum dominance of information and propaganda, or will the free-speakers keep plugging the memory hole, blowing up Potemkin Villages and spreading forbidden knowledge?

    In America, the right of free speech still theoretically exists. For now, therefore, the battle will continue to be waged by technological means, and during this phase of the struggle there will surely be multiple, even profitable, ways found for the propagation of “banned” information.

    The game seems most likely, however, to end with Chinese-style information tyranny backed by laws, such as the emerging laws against anti-Semitism, anti-racism, “hate speech,” Canada’s idiotic law to compel the use of PC pronouns, etc., etc., (laws, that is, against anything that impedes the emergence of the Fascist New World Order).

    At that point, the question will be whether Americans and others in the West submit or embark on a civil war.

    Physical resistance to the NWO is, I think, most unlikely, not because of overwhelming Jewish power, but because of the treason of non-Jews, the people with power who have been bought and paid for by the Money Power, Jewish, Gentile, Hindu and Muslim.

    Why are the Western nations so corrupt? Because they have trashed Christianity and now believe in nothing much beyond money, sex and power, which means getting along by going along with whatever the Money Power demands, even if that means genocide of your own people and trashing your own nation.

    • Replies: @m___
  127. For anybody who wants to get beyond the cognitive orchestral tutti of the riddled-with-spies catchphrase, you can look at the evidence in context here, and judge for yourself.

    algerhiss.com/history/new-evidence-surfaces-1990s/the-venona-cables/

  128. utu says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Call it deNile.com.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  129. Mike P says:
    @Lot

    Amazon doesn’t want antisemitic business, good for them putting morality over profits.

    Private companies that capitulate to bullying by powerful lobbies are doing the exact opposite.

    It is wonderful that our free country gives us such choice.

    You always have the choice not to read a book you don’t like. What is going on here is that the public is denied access to books it might like.

  130. geokat62 says:

    … the highly derogatory term goyim…

    but, but, but… Sam Shama assured me that I was completely mistaken when I suggested the same thing. You don’t suppose he was trying to pull the wool over our Dumb Goyim eyes, do you?

  131. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:

    awaiting moderation says
    I was going to applaud Ron Unz willingness to go against his own people and say Im not sure i could be as unbiased towards my own. Rons bravery does actually go without saying ,but its occured to me Im an outlier the problem Ron and I and others are trying to solve is actually partly a result of my fellow whites all too easily being willing to go against their own to the point its almost an invitation to abuse us.
    Rons and other jews who are speaking up really make me sad that at this point its too late whites are either going to go bezerk and throw everyone out of their nations or the immigrants are going to murder us soon. Ok maybe if every jew woke up tomorrow and began acting like Unz we might unwind this without bloodshed but short of that there’s no unwinding the past 100 years without war.

  132. utu says:
    @Anon

    This ‘ben sampson’ is a troll. He would rather see us discuss Vatican and British Monarchy conspiracy.

  133. nsa says:

    Tail Gunner Joe McCarthy is getting smeared here in the comment section. There is no evidence Joe was any more alcoholic than your average congressman in the 1950s. It is true he was not your brightest specimen of humanity, but then tail gunners were selected for their light weight and high risk tolerance. Tail gunners had a very high attrition rate. Enemy fighters would routinely get under the tail and rake the rear of the bomber with 50 cal machine gun and 20 mm canon fire. Have read that Joe and his pal Roy Cohn mulled fingering the joos in the state department directly, but decided such a tactic was a bridge too far. So instead they opted to ferret out the “communists” in the state department. The JudenPresse and their owned congress critters made short work of good ole Tail Gunner Joe…….”have you no sense of decency, sir?” was the front page headline on every newspaper in the country.

    • Replies: @fnn
  134. fnn says:
    @nsa

    He wasn’t a tail gunner, he was a USMC intelligence officer. He did serve on a small number of combat flights.

  135. Some writers and commenters here don’t like black people or Islam very much. I hope this and related articles will challenge their views by calling attention to the terrific work of the NOI Research Group, and the brave and eloquent truth-speaking of the Honorable Minister Farrakhan. Relentlessly attacked in the Zionist-dominated media, the NOI has helped tens of thousands of people, many from severely deprived backgrounds, improve their lives and become honorable, productive, moral citizens. The spiritual discipline of Islam, along with its insistence on working for justice and resisting oppression, seems particularly well-suited to the African-American community. Maybe the best thing that could happen to America would be for real Islam (not Wahhabi fanaticism or watered-down “liberal Islam”) to spread rapidly, especially among our underclass.

  136. The JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire is about to walk the plank.

    There is no doubt that wealthy and powerful Jews are buying politicians such as Trump.

    Shelly Adelson has bought and paid for Trump.

    Shelly Adelson has bought almost every Republican in the US Congress.

    Shelly Adelson wants to continue to use the US military as muscle to fight wars on behalf of Israel.

    Walt and Mearsheimer in their book — THE ISRAEL LOBBY — said the same thing as US House Rep. Omar about wealthy and powerful Jews buying politicians like common whores.

    These wealthy and powerful Israel First Jews buy these rancid whore politicians or they destroy them if these politicians balk at complying with the demands of these wealthy and powerful Jews. These wealthy and powerful Israel First Jews don’t find it too difficult to find rancid whore politicians willing to put the interests of Israel ahead of the interests of the USA.

    The JEW/WASP ruling class of the American Empire puts the interests of Israel ahead of the interests of the United States of America. That is TREASON!

  137. @Wally

    Wally you took the words right out of my mouth. After reading this article all I could say was Wow.
    Thanks Mr. Unz for this fascinating article.

  138. edNels says:

    This subject matter calls for some dedicated serious attention, more than I have at the moment, but still I might throw out one little aside.

    […”

    his accusations of massive Communist political subversion were absolutely correct and indeed somewhat understated.

    Now on the issue of Communism, having known many of them through unionized work environment, I spent some time around them, and I’m interested generally in what people have to say, so getting a pretty good idea of what these guys were about. But to balance it out I also know or knew some ultra righties and I read and attended JBS a few times for my edification.

    The average American can’t manage much of a description of C or Socialism either, or maybe much about the workings of Democracy, leave it at that.

    When McCarthy comes up with or without his buddy Roy Cohn I just can’t quite put him in a good light, even though I can see that he may have had correct observations about communism and its growing influence. But in the snipped quote: ”’absolutely’ correct”’ , that’s kind of loose language. science class ie: chemistry to use the of word absolute, there isn’t much absolute observed in behavioral world to begin with much less politics!
    Further: [ …”somewhat understated”. No Way is that sensible. McCarthy’s whole schtick was bombastic overstate of the ‘ enth degree!

    If there was to be any constructive point from the warnings about Communism as an alien enemy force, then that should have been relegated to a higher level. What is the point of these media hoaxes… might ask someday.

    The ”Red Scare” didn’t really take into account that there are many ways to achieve things while one way is too plain and obvious, then another plan can work by greater deception, which is probably the only constant.

    To that end, of course the use of language, even semantics is engaged. So when people lost jobs and careers and got their names ruined around careless allegations about not very well intentioned slurs like any old witch hunt style, ” ya know he’s a Commy” or ” They had so & so over must be something’ going on…”

    I mean this isn’t the highest form of human activity to label others like in these ways that you don’t really have to back anything up just spread BS, Well count me out on that kind of crap.
    If you’re talking about ”Communism” it must be something worth getting more definitive as to what that exactly is… to know what that would likely look like, much less would that have anything to do with outside influences from Russia/Soviet Union? Marx, Germany, Jews?

    How about easing in incrementally so smooth over time something that (works like Communism ),(state ownership of production and command economy etc.) with a different sounding name, or no name, just Do IT.

    Then have fake corporations that appear to the average shit head like ”PRIVATE PROPERTY” Have some nurd MFr dressed up Exactly like DR. Evil and nobody even bats their eyelash… Then you can have your f’n affluent communism (remember under any name a Rose is just a rose… )and eat your cake too!
    When there isn’t any other choices left where to shop, then up the price! and limit the choice. Ya think they would ever do that?

  139. Cleburne says:

    Ron, here is another I would strongly recommend for preservation on your site: The Controversy of Zion, by Douglas Reed.

    https://www.controversyofzion.info

    Thanks for what you do. And stay safe.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  140. Jett Rucker says: • Website
    @Lot

    This characterization of Amazon and some of its customers inspires me (again) to quote the inimitable Joseph Sobran’s definition of anti-Semitism:

    Once a term referring to a person who dislikes Jews, it now refers to a person who is disliked by Jews.

    Amazon now avoids business with people who(se views) are disliked by Jews.

  141. geokat62 says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    … the NOI has helped tens of thousands of people, many from severely deprived backgrounds, improve their lives and become honorable, productive, moral citizens.

    This is a laudable accomplishment. As a result, you’ll hear no complaints from me on this front.

  142. m___ says:
    @CanSpeccy

    Physical resistance to the NWO is, I think, most unlikely, not because of overwhelming Jewish power, but because of the treason of non-Jews, the people with power who have been bought and paid for by the Money Power, Jewish, Gentile, Hindu and Muslim.

    Good proof of concept. Hindu and Muslim will stay “local”, and “flat” fielders. But as understood, the rule of the land by crude escalation of tools, especially and first financial capitalism and the underbelly, sorrowy consumerism has created the conditioning. Lame, no balls all guts underclasses, and shortsighted elites grown out of it. If the morsel is Amazon, that is a crump. The ultimate cocoon is the US, can anyone conceive a world beyond it, here on unz by Unz?

    There is a lot to admire in the Jewish mindset to divert and divest and grope at such a mess. Adapting the tactics of the enemy helps.

  143. Rurik says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    .. commenters here don’t like black people or Islam very much. ..

    eloquent truth-speaking of the Honorable Minister Farrakhan.

    Perhaps they’re returning the favor, since I’ve seen Minister Farrakhan speak less than gushingly about white people.

    But in truth, I agree that the message (sans the anti-White calumny) of the NOI is a positive one for many black Americans.

    What do you think about the NOI’s black nationalism? Is it to be lauded?

    In any case, I just posted a comment describing 99% of the clergy in the ZUSA as corrupt and venal. I would Not consider ‘Calypso Louie’ as part of that group.

    He may denigrate white people, and that’s his right, but at least he speaks the truth about Jewish supremacism. Something far too many Christian clergy are too cowardly and sniveling to ever do.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @republic
  144. Harbinger says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Why would I, a white man, want anything, whatsoever to do with a foolish black man, who believes white people are “blue eyed devils created in the laboratories of Jacub?”

    What amazes me about Farrakhan is that as a member of NOI he has happily forgiven Islam for enslaving far, far more of his people than any Trans Atlantic Slave Trade did and yet continues to see white people as his enemy and not Islam?
    If he cared to do his research on the Sub Saharan Slave Trade he would find the following:

    1. There were more blacks who died en route to Arabia and the middle east, than almost the total number of slaves taken from Africa, during all the years of the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade.

    2. The population of blacks, in the USA, many who are descendants of the slaves, whose ancestors won their freedom is around 40 million. However, why are there very few blacks in the middle east? There aren’t many for the simple reason that the women slaves went to the brothels and the males were castrated, worked in hard labour camps and sent off to fight and die in the armed forces of the time. If we were to calculate just how many blacks would live in the middle east, using the USA as a proportionate comparison, there would be around 3billion of their descendants, had they not been castrated and given their freedom from Muslims, as the whites did.

    3. Farrakhan is a virulent racist, that is in the modern definition of Trotsky’s original one. He hates white people for slavery but loves Islam, ironically ignoring its history.

    Christianity USED to have just what blacks needed, before it was infiltrated by the Jews and the left who have utterly corrupted it, turning it now into an abomination of what it was.

    I have no hatred for Islam or Muslims. However, Islam has its place in the world and not in the west. I will submit to NO ONE.

    As someone from the UK, you are clearly ignorant to what is happening to my once, beautiful set of nations. Whole cities in England are becoming almost a Muslim majority, all pushing for Sharia law and seeking to Islamize them. Streets, formerly bustling with indigenous now have burkha clad women, walking up and down, through bazaars one would find in Islamabad and Karachi. Muhammad is now the most popular name in England. Birmingham is England’s second largest city now with a Muslim majority. The Muslim mayor of London, promotes mass immigration, while knife crime soars, where the police can do nothing courtesy of being destroyed by the Jewish created MacPherson report on the death of black drug dealer Saint Stephen Lawrence.

    There’s nothing I loathe more than Islamic apologists such as yourself. If you love Islam so much then pack your bags and go and live with them. Nothing worse that white people, in the west who are more concerned on the plight of Muslims, while doing nothing about the continuing white genocide happening to their own people, they happily choose to ignore.

  145. @jfk

    As far as I know no publisher has put out a translation of this book in English. This particular example is far larger than Amazon.

    If anybody has a link to a decent English critique of A. S.’s book I would be very interested to see it. Years in the gulag might not fortify one’s impartiality. The volunteer English translation of his book can be hard slogging.

  146. Career says:

    … the NOI has helped tens of thousands of people, many from severely deprived backgrounds, improve their lives and become honorable, productive, moral citizens.

    • Replies: @Alden
  147. @Kevin Barrett

    Speaking of the Nation of Islam, have you read the book “Zebra”?

  148. mh505 says:
    @jacques sheete

    @jacques sheete

    What’re your recommendations?

    I think we all know what action shall be needed; and that such action in no way can be based on so-called “democratic” means

  149. Well, Jeff Bezos is a capitalist, not a communist. Perhaps McCarthy should have been screaming about Zionist capitalism? I’d say McCarthyism is comparable to Russiagate, McCarthy was distracting from the Judeo-capitalist takeover of America by screaming about commies. The Russiagaters are distracting from Judeo-capitalist meddling/control of our politics, economy, and media by screaming about Russia and Putin.

    Monopolies are the guaranteed end product of the capitalist system, not communism. Private enterprise has no obligation to protect free speech, so your censorship problem is also the result of capitalism, not communism.

    So called Jews have gained their riches through state sponsored usury or capitalism not communism. Capitalism is not possible without private banking and private banking is institutionalized usury. Usury is Plutocracy. Compound interest makes it inevitable that the very richest own everything within generations. Capitalism has allowed them to accumulate more wealth than many entire countries are worth, so much money that they can buy governments at will, and have. Capitalism is an economic system who’s driving force is maximizing of profits, and as such the State aligned with Corporations is the most advanced form of capitalism because it is the most profitable.

    The capitalist system was designed in an era of widespread slavery. It is designed to shift profits from workers to the owners of capital, it is working exactly intended, constitutional rights be damned. Money is power, and he with the most money has absolute power. It was never designed to create a prosperous working class, was not designed to protect the rights of the poor or middle class. There were some reforms in the 30s to the system, but these have since been eroded by modern day robber barons. Its no accident that liberty is eroding as their power and wealth outgrows that of the government and workers.

    You can scream communism is a threat and is destroying America till your’re blue in the face, but the fact remains that America is the most rabid capitalist country this planet has ever known.

    Imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism, perhaps Zionism is the highest stage of imperialism. Globalism is just another buzzword to distract from capitalism. Capitalism/Zionism end result is one huge global monopoly and control of all resources in a few private hands, hegemony over the world economies, using its control over the United States foreign policy.

    Zionism, through its control of Western finance capitalism, is striving for global governance. Lenin, writing in 1915, described as ‘indisputable’ the fact that ‘development is proceeding towards monopolies, hence, towards a single world monopoly, towards a single world trust’.

    The love of money is the root of all evil, you were warned!

    Just muh opinion.

    Revealed – the capitalist network that runs the world
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354-500-revealed-the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world/

    https://zionistreport.com/2016/04/commentary-capitalism-is-jewish-usury/

    Free PDF of Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews Vol. 1
    http://www.legalucc.com/secret_relationship_blacks_and/The-Secret-Relationship-Between-Blacks-and-Jews.pdf

    You can find PDF’s of the other volumes with a little work.

  150. Excellent thought about the ‘UNZ Book Exchange’. Ron is the quintessential software innovator, so he can create the alternative book distribution web portal and bust the chops of Amazon and others in the alternative reading space–must be a large population of prospective customers out there. I’ve purchased hundreds of books from Amazon over the past 5-10 years and would love to take my business elsewhere.

  151. m___ says:
    @Abundans Cautela Non Nocet

    EMJ’s 1200-page TJRS can be found in pdf and djvu formats on Library Genesis and other places on the internet. I ordered his Barren Metal and Slaughter of Our Cities through Amazon. These are relatively mild compared to his other books. If I wanted a book but it was really controversial like the book Ron Unz refers to…

    That is the right mindset, the ones who should and can act must stay out of the eye. Now authors not making ends meet, is and can be addressed in other ways, and should as a priority. We wish Ron zero revenue out of Patreon in the same spirit of things.

  152. geokat62 says:
    @Rurik

    Something far too many Christian clergy are too cowardly and sniveling to ever do.

    So true, Rurik. But, I’m happy to report the tide is slowly but surely turning on this front, as well.

    Just get a load of this quote from a Christian preacher, Rick Wiles, of TruNews:

    So, it’s like this. We’re all in a living room and the living room is piling up with elephant dung. And the elephant dung is getting higher and higher and higher. And everybody’s griping about the elephant crap. But you can’t talk about the elephant. You’re not allowed to mention the elephant. And somebody says “hey, why don’t we get the elephant under control and this crap would leave?”… and you’re not allowed to talk about it. Well, who’s crapping on the country? Who is crapping in this country? Who has brought the abortion, the homosexuality, the sexual liberation movement, the vile movies? [the constant wars]. Who has attacked our Christian culture? Who has filed lawsuits to remove crosses and Bibles? Who has done it? The Synagogue of Satan. And you cannot be a preacher in this country and refuse to deal with the truth and then stand some day in front of God and say that you preached the Gospel. You cannot do it. We’re reaching a point in time when you have to confront the Synagogue of Satan. It is what it is!

    Ilhan Omar Controversy: Is Valid Criticism of Israel Policies Racist Hate Speech?

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
    , @Rurik
  153. @Cleburne

    That title (“The Controversy of Zion”) should be revised to pluralize those issues. The “Jews” who occupied Palestine were not descended from Jews. They were converted. The concept developed by Zionists would compel opponents to Zionists annexing a nation containing an indigenous, Semitic population on the premise that they were exercising a “Right of Return” to their “Homeland”, to disregard the pertinent fact that these so-called “Jews” were not returning; they were invading. Herzl was not influential during the process of selecting that location. Madagascar would have been a much better location, and envoys were sent there to assess the island’s suitability for such an influx. Palestine was actually the worst possible choice, for reasons which now are obvious.

    • Replies: @Cleburne
  154. @Kevin Barrett

    Some writers and commenters here don’t like black people or Islam very much.

    Welcome to Hasbara central Mr. Barrett. Obvious ain’t it?

    For a group of people who hate Jews/Zionist so damn much, they sure act a lot like them.

    Perhaps they’re just ashamed that those GOP heroes of theirs don’t have the courage or integrity to speak truth to power like Mr. Farrakhan or Ilhan Omar.

    Perhaps their minds have been successfully programmed by Fox News, Glenn Beck, and John Hagee?

    • Replies: @Harbinger
  155. @Ron Unz

    I’m not sure you are seeing my point. The language you use to describe the referenced material is subjective. And a bit overwrought. I’d like some numbers.

    “heavily infested”?

    • Troll: Ron Unz
    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Alden
  156. Cowboy says:
    @wayfarer

    Patrick Little says Gab (Torba) is controlled opposition. He claims that Gab is the illusion of an alternative platform. He calls Torba a Chomsky clone who keeps people from waking up.

    One reason I like unz.com is because I don’t have to have a registered user. One disadvantage of this is that there are missing features like up/down vote. Gab forces you to register your user to use this new dissenter app. I installed the plugin into firefox, and I can even without logging in I can see whether anyone has commented on any given article. There are none for this unz article.

  157. republic says:
    @Rurik

    In any case, I just posted a comment describing 99% of the clergy in the ZUSA as corrupt and venal. I would Not consider ‘Calypso Louie’ as part of that group.

    He may denigrate white people, and that’s his right, but at least he speaks the truth about Jewish supremacism. Something far too many Christian clergy are too cowardly and sniveling to ever do.

    It is time to start a campaign to strip all churches of their tax exempt status.

    These churches all push for SJW agendas including advocating for open borders

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  158. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    It’s well known to American historians. Most, being ultra liberal approve. Allowing Harry Dexter White to remove from the US mint authentic us currency plates along with the formulas for paper and ink to Russia the millions of non military vehicles sent to Russia, appointing ultra left Russian agent William Bullit ambassador to Russia Mrs Roosevelt’s given authority over the Russian department of the state department and her destroying the files on soviet Russia against the wishes of the state department blocking anti communist George Keenan’s career, in 1938 the head of security of the state department presented the evidence personally to FDR and was told to cease his investigations and destroy the evidence

    It’s very well known to American historians Numerous books about FDR’s appointment of known communists in important positions as well as making a communist his Vice President that was Henry Wallace.

    Just because you are ignorant of something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist

    Does anyone remember the name of the 1930s state department head of security? Can’t find it in the internet and I’m not going over to the university library?

  159. Cleburne says:
    @David Baker

    Yes, Reed goes through all of that in great detail.

  160. @Kevin Barrett

    Some writers and commenters here don’t like black people or Islam very much.

    We can’t help it. Yakub of Shabazz selectively bred us to hate black people.

    • LOL: Erebus
  161. republic says:
    @Michael Hoffman

    only 65 books of volume 1 are available world wide. 3 are outside the US, one located in Israel!

    https://www.worldcat.org/title/secret-relationship-between-blacks-and-jews/oclc/25970645

  162. @geokat62

    Ilhan Omar

    Ilhan Omar Traveled With Anti-American, Pro-Communist Group

    Ilhan Omar took part in a travel delegation sponsored by ‘Witness For Peace,’ an organization formed to stop American intervention efforts in South America combatting the spread of communism

    Witness For Peace was formed in 1983 as a means to oppose President Ronald Reagan’s anti-communist policies in South America. They currently have close relations with communists in Cuba

    She followed that up with a sophomoric grilling of Elliot Abrams…in which she asked his opinion on whether the El Mozote massacre in El Salvador “was a fabulous achievement that happened under [the United States’] watch.”

  163. Alden says:
    @Johnny Rico

    Ron’s article may be new information to you, but it’s very well known to historians and anyone interested. I’ve been using university libraries to learn about FDR’s “ heavily infested “
    With communists administration all my life.

    you won’t find the information with internet searches All you’ll find with internet searches is endless denials of the truth

    You might want to read George Keenan’s books and about the Venona transcripts

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
  164. Cowboy says:
    @Ron Unz

    After Judea declared war on Germany in 1933, the Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxists moved to Columbia University in NY. Wiki:

    “Soon after Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, the Institute first moved from Frankfurt to Geneva, and then to New York City, in 1935, where the Frankfurt School joined Columbia University”

    The Roosevelt bloodline had already murdered its way into its fortune by forcibly pushing opium and creating addicts of the Chinese citizens of the Qing Dynasty. Many reports identify them as Crypto-jews with the original family name of Rosenfeld. Cousin Teddy had run for president under the Bull Moose party and helped insure the election of Woodrow Wilson, thus paving the way for the Fed, the IRS and WWI. Franklin continued the family tradition by seizing the peoples gold, jacking up income taxes to astronomical rates, and then forming all his jew run fascsicstic organizations, from CCC to WPA. Meanwhile. Walter Duranty of the NYT was lying to the US how great things were going in the USSR while deliberately covering up the Holodomor. Then, to cap it off, he sent Americans of Japanese heritage to Concentration camps and dragged the US into a war for Jews and Communism.

    Bolshevism and Communism are only part of the picture, and the genocides and enslavement of Europe and the coming of the Moschiach are only a part of the entire plan. A new world order based on Technocracy is also a key element. Scientists, working for jews and crypto-jews, will decide what is best for the poor chipped and enslaved masses. This is Agenda 21, and 2030. Sustainable development. Global Warming/Cooling/Changing. Rising Oceans. This is Ocasio-Cortez performing her role to precondition the stupid sheeple for Agenda 21.

    They, the Rabbis pushing for the Moschiach, have laid the foundation for the complete and total enslavement of the goyim and destruction of the Christian church and the European seed. In their eyes we are Amalek. “Intellectuals” and “scientists” have been busy selling us out for centuries. They have destroyed our sperm count, turned our children into autistics, queers, trannies, and drug addicts. They have kept interest rates so low for so long that a small increase in rates will cause a complete bankruptcy of the American people. This will make FDR’s gold seizure look benevolent. Plus, not only was 9/11 a complete hoax.

    After all that comes the enforcement of the Noahide laws. Christians are Idolaters in the eyes of Jews and their Talmudic law. Moslems are not. The Noahide laws declare the death penalty for idolatry. The Noahide laws have already passed Congress and are US law. Are Europeans prepared once again to face the lions?

    • Replies: @David Baker
  165. @wayfarer

    I’m a big fan of Gab and use it daily, but

    1) Gab has 225,000 registered users, compared to 328 million monthly active users on Twitter, according to a Mashable article dated Aug 18, 2017. So around .035% of the Twitter audience, or statistically a rounding error.

    2) And Dissenter has only a small fraction of Gab users. So less than 1% of less than 1%. It’s wonderful to have the opportunity to freely comment on articles all over the Internet, but I can do the same thing in my living room to my dog and have roughly the same reach.

    3) Most people reading an article will comment on the website itself. Unless one specifically downloads the software, adds an icon to your browser toolbar, and actually opens the separate l’il window, Dissenter comments remain invisible to all.

    4) Little tiny window in the upper right corner shows, what, a hundred characters? And we can’t comment on comments, which everyone knows is the juiciest part of Disqus. The Dissenter format isn’t conducive for any serious discussion.

    5) “Publish to Gab” button doesn’t work. I’ve tried it several times over several days.

    6) Dissenter doesn’t work at Ace of Spades, where I’ve been banned for Naming the Jew. I’m sure there are compatibility issues elsewhere, but that’s the only one I’ve found so far.

    7) Not sure why a promo for Dissenter is appropriate for this American Pravda article anyway.

    Andrew Torba is a great leader in our fight for free speech, but even Edison electrocuted an elephant.

  166. Alden says:
    @Career

    That’s what NOI claims. But the fact remains that the only blacks who join the organization are convicted felons while they are in prison.

    It’s naive to believe their press releases

  167. Cowboy says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    “Some writers and commenters here don’t like black people”

    Ron Unz hosts a great blog called SBPDL (Stuff Black People Don’t Like). You can see it on the front page. Paul Kersey has thousands of posts going back 10 years of documenting black hatred for white people. It is truly incredible, with a great search engine. Go ahead, put in the name of a major US city. Colin Flaherty has written books about it. White Girl Bleed A Lot and Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry, probably both banned from Amazon too. He had a great Youtube channel until Black apologists finally forced youtube to block it, just like the subject of this Unz artice. Flaherty was taken down for showing black hate and violence against whites, and Asians. Flaherty had hundreds of youtube clips showing black violence to US Asian peoples too. Too.Much.Truth.

    Below the more are some clips showing black hate for whites:

    [MORE]


    This one is great: “armed robber not satisfied with just taking the loot. He also had to tie up the clerk and a customer and try to burn them alive.”

  168. I’m a little surprised this article didn’t reference an earlier featured interview on this very site with an author discussing his personal experience with Amazonian censorship. From last October, maybe?

    I wish I could remember the title or had the link. It was a good (albeit disconcerting) read.

  169. Rich says:

    I haven’t had time to go through all the comments on this article, but, once again, I have to thank, and congratulate Mr Unz on his excellent writing and web site. There are few places in this modern world where free speech is allowed and celebrated, this site is golden. Thank you Mr Unz, and please keep up the great work.

    • Agree: Pat Kittle
  170. @ben sampson

    …it is time to break up all corporations everywhere in the world.

    It’s a do-it-yourself proposition.

    If “we” depend on some gubbermint to do it, we’re screwed from the outset.

    The people voted for [Teddy] Roosevelt be cause he talked of “trust-busting” at the same time that he was sanctioning the purchase of the Tennessee Coal and Iron Company by the Steel Trust. They supported Wilson “because he kept us out of war” at the same time that Wilson was making preparations to enter the war. The rulers can negotiate “secret treaties” at home and abroad. The people, knowing nothing of either the theory or the practice of secret diplomacy, commit all sorts of follies for which they themselves must later foot the bill.

    – R. F. PETTIGREW, TRIUMPHANT PLUTOCRACY, The Story ofAmerican Public Life from 1870 to 1920.

  171. Alden says:
    @Johnny Rico

    Ron is absolutely right about the communist infiltration of FDR’s administration including his 3 rd. Vice President Wallace.

    Just because you believe the pro communist anti McCarthy brainwashing you’ve been exposed to since 7 grade social studies to every time you watch TCM doesn’t mean it isn’t true.

    You won’t find much on the internet.

    I’ve started researching the truth about communist infiltration in the USA about 50 years ago when I bought Eugene Lyons “ Assignment in Utopia” and learned about FDR’s ambassador Bullit and Walter Duranty. I’ve had the advantage of access to 3 of the biggest university libraries west of the Mississippi my entire adult life.

    It’s surprising that the university librarians haven’t purged the anti communist books. I’d say about 80 percent of the university library books are very pro communist. But the other 20 percent are still there and a couple hundred dollars a year for a friend of the library card, a stroll through the stacks and one can easily find the entire story of FDR’s communist administration

    Ron is absolutely right and everything you learned in school, the media and 80 percent of the publications about American communism is absolutely wrong wrong wrong.

  172. republic says:

    Meanwhile, Frank had received benefit of the longest trial in modern Southern history, backed by the finest trial lawyers that money could buy, and based on overwhelming evidence had been sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a young girl. But when Frank’s legal verdict was carried out by extra-judicial means, he immediately became the most famous lynching victim in American history,

    Frank received the death penalty after two years of ligation and appeals up to the US Supreme Court.

    In April,1915, an application for a commutation of Frank’s sentence was to the Ga prison commission.

    It was rejected by a vote of 2-1 on June 9, 1915.

    The governor of Georgia was due to leave office a few days after Frank’s scheduled execution.
    On June 21st , the Governor released an order to commute Frank’s sentence to life imprisonment.

    The public in Georgia was outraged at that outcome.

    A group of prominent Georgians including a former Governor, a former mayor and several
    Local sheriffs was formed.

    This party of 28 men, including an electrician, a mechanic, a locksmith, a telephone man,
    A medic, and a hangman.

    This group of men drove 150 miles to the state prison where Frank was located.

    They cut the telephone wires, others drained the gas from the prison warden’s car,,handcuffed the
    Warden and then drove 175 miles to a location near Atlanta where Frank was lynched.

    A later Grand jury refused to indict any of the lynching party.

  173. @Johnny Rico

    “Honeycombed” and “control nearly seized” is breathless hysteria.

    Sources, please, or it’s a garbage claim which sounds like brainless hysteria to me. In fact, it sounds to me that he understated the facts.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
  174. Harbinger says:
    @redmudhooch

    Hasbara Central?
    Really?

    Interesting the people that the UNZ review attracts onto its forums isn’t it?

    Let’s see……

    We have the right wing, that is those who promote freedom and wish to live by their own culture, keeping their heritage and their lands, predominantly of their own race, safe from invasion and destruction of by alien peoples.

    and

    We have the left wing, that is those who promote multiculturalism, multiracialism, the LGBTQ, while being virulently anti right wing, haters of white culture, history and heritage, blaming them for the problems within the black community….think of the SJW’s, the feminists, the LGBTQ, ANTIFA, Black Lives Matter and any other organization that bangs on whitey.

    But within both groups there is a dislike for the Jews. From the view of the right, control of western nations, owning of banking, the msm, academia, the arts, films, sports, music and a host of other industries, all working in tandem to utterly obliterate the west and genocide the white man. From the view of the left, their persecution of the Palestinian peoples.

    If the Jews weren’t doing what they were to the Palestinians, there wouldn’t be a peep from the left, because every other implementation that the Jew is doing to debase and destroy the west, they’re all fully on board with, more so because pretty much all left wing organization have a Jew slap bang in the middle as its founder.

    And so Islam….
    Hmm…..
    Yes, as someone not from the USA I can clearly see the Zionist propaganda from Fox News, the O’Reilly’s, Becks, Hannitys and Hagees. I can clearly see that the Zionists are happily promoting hatred towards Islam in order to get new recruits from the dumb, American population to fight in their wars of invasion and plunder, not forgetting to remove their enemies. I can clearly see that ISIS is a creation of Zionism and western controlled security services. I can clearly see that Islam is getting a bad rap. We have the controlled puppets doing their best as well to foment hatred towards Islam such as Tommy Robinson, Milo Yiannopolous, Douglas Murray to name a few.

    However,

    What I see, are cities becoming predominantly Muslim. When I lived in London I was confronted, one evening by an Islamic Sharia patrol in East London, where 4 men, in Islamic attire thought they tell myself, my friend and his girlfriend that she wasn’t dressed appropriately and this was a alcohol free zone. I of course told them simply that if they weren’t out of here within the next ten seconds, all four would end up in hospital, some may never wake up.
    What I see are Muslims pushing for Sharia Law, seeing the UK as now an Islamic state (and will be most certainly by 2060).
    What I see are people who have absolutely no respect, whatsoever for my culture and the fact they are guests in my land, not their, that they wish to take over and enforce their Islamic way of life upon those who do not wish it. And ironically they are using the very liberal laws, they despise to bring about their caliphate.

    I used to write a blog called the Destruction of Britain back in 2009/2010. In it I simply stated that Islam would gain complete dominance in the west through immigration, procreation rates and of course tribal voting. I stated that at first we would see the introduction of Islamic parties. I stated that as the Muslim population grew, the parties would become more prominent. I stated that eventually, courtesy of indigenous mistrust of political parties – the left, right and centre, seeing them all as not representative of them, they’d stop voting. I stated that what would then happen would be those indigenous who did vote, their vote would be split. Although the majority over the Muslims, only by about 20% or so, they’d lose, because the Muslims would vote as a tribal group and win election. Upon claiming victory they would immediately remove common law for favour of Islamic law and remove all democratic voting for the future, instantly binding the mosque with the state, turning the UK into a theocracy. By that time there would be be more Muslims in the armed forces and police. This would, of course bring about civil war. And I stated this would come about by the middle of the 21st century.
    Ironically, as I write, this very thing has started to happen in Belgium with the introduction of an Islamic party pushing for Sharia Law. It won’t win…..yet, but give it another 30 years and a couple more generations of Muslim births along with more mass, Islamic immigration, courtesy of the Jews and voila – Belgiumistan!!!

    The thing with Muslims and Islam is quite simple. I refer to the Scorpion and the Frog fable. It’s in their very upbringing, their religious teachings to Islamise ever land that they inhabit. Therefore it’s not that I blame them for being Muslim and wishing to implement their society wherever they go.
    I do however have a problem with their complete and utter lack of respect in not seeing that there are many people, in the lands they move into WHO DO NOT WANT TO LIVE UNDER ISLAM!

    Are you able to understand this or are you just another lefty, who happily promotes white genocide and the eventual turning of the west into part of the global, Islamic Ummah?

  175. @Wally

    Except that Amazon is not a truly private business since it accepts US taxpayers money via federal contracts.

    True.

    And it pays to remember that all the corporations we’re talking about are government protected entities and as such are immoral and dangerous.

    PS: Thanks for catching my error about the “holocaust survivors” aboard the Patria that were murdered by the terrorists of Haganah. I should have used quotation marks as I just did.

  176. @Cowboy

    Rabbi Stephen Wise exclaimed: “Some call it Marxism. I call it Judaism”. His candid admission would be validated wherever these people “Set up Shop”.

  177. Cowboy says:
    @Alden

    “Allowing Harry Dexter White to remove from the US mint authentic us currency plates along with the formulas for paper and ink to Russia”

    Major Jordan wrote:

    “I said, “that we have printed German occupation money for Russia and shipped the currency itself.””No, no,” he replied. He insisted that plates, colored inks, varnish, tint blocks, sample paper-these and similar materials had gone through Great Falls in May in two shipments of five C-47s each.”

    http://www.citizensnewswire.org/files/mjd.pdf

    I read/heard somewhere else that what Jordan delivered was just the plates for the Occupation Marks that the US printed after occupation. Apparently De Gaulle was quite concerned that the US was going to impose the US dollar on France after liberation. In Berlin, the US was playing games with the Russian zone by threatening to no longer accept Reichmarks. That Stalin demanded plates to be able to strip the German losers of their wealth equally well is no surprise.

    When the war is completed, currency manipulation becomes one of the best means to strip the losers of their wealth. Thats what happened in Reconstruction, Weimar and Occupation.

  178. To wit, intrepid Ron has struck again with a well researched and thoughtful polemics… hopefully, something meaningful will come out of it. I just wish he would contribute more frequently nonetheless, I look forward to the next installment!

  179. @Lot

    You don’t mean anti-Semitic, you mean anti-Jewish. There’s no evidence that amazon is banning anti-Arab books.

    Next, Amazon has no moral qualms about taking money from the sale of books expressing harsh criticism of, even hatred towards, white people, Christians, Russians, Muslims, and on and on. What paragons of virtue they are indeed.

    You are a liar and an apologist for “the right people” controlling what people read, see, learn, and therefore THINK.

  180. @Alden

    Does anyone remember the name of the 1930s state department head of security?

    Have not yet found it, but found this interesting.:

    OTHER SENIOR OFFICIALS: [of the US State Department]
    Special Envoys

    Special Envoy for Holocaust Issues
    Special Envoy for the Human Rights of LGBTI Persons

    Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism

    Our tax dollars at work. onebornfree’ll like that!

  181. @Alden

    Thank you for prompting me to update my patchy information on some matters of interest though no great importance to me. You should try it. I was about to help but really your arrogance caused you to blow your attempted put down so badly that I think trying to help might be wasted until you try some self help. E.g. Roosevelt was long dead by the time White caused the occupation plates to be given to the Soviet Union. And Bullitt [two ts] was far from being an “ultra left Russian agent” – much more like a rich old educated WASP socialite who quickly got disillusioned with the Soviet leadership (were you confused by the fact that he married John Reed’s lefty activist widow Louise Bryant just in time to make their daughter legitimate?). And I wonder a bit at your not picking up your mistaking the Scots-Irish “Kennan” for the old Irish “Keenan” even if it was a typo.

  182. @Achmed E. Newman

    Clearly you understand less than nothing about “government controlled” health care, or communism. There are many models, but most of them simply replace the private insurance company with a public “insurance company”. I choose my own doctor, assuming (s)he will have me as a patient, and the MD bills the public “insurance company”. When I have been hospitalized, I receive no bill. I pay for my prescriptions and dental work through my private insurance. The same for physio and occupational therapy, unless I am in hospital. Is the system perfect? No, but no system is. All I know is that the premiums my US relatives pay for health insurance more than makes up for the difference in taxation rate. By the way, studies show the US system, as it exists today, is not only more expensive, but has worse outcomes. Here is one example:
    https://www.commonwealthfund.org/press-release/2015/us-spends-more-health-care-other-high-income-nations-has-lower-life-expectancy

    I have 2 cousins who are MDs, one a specialist. Both detest the insurance companies and claim that the 1973 legislation creating HMOs was the death knell of the US system. It changed what was largely a not for profit system into a system controlled by the insurance industry.

  183. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @utu

    Call it deNile.com.

    Yes, that’s better. Or maybe antideNile.com.

  184. @Bill Jones

    Maybe I’m slow. Is it your point – a new one I think – that the subsidised Post Office props up the lying NYT, Washington Post etc.?

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  185. Skeptikal says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    “The Indian girl”???

    WTF?

    I realize that English is not your first language, but can’t you try a little harder, Russian Girl?

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Bill Jones
  186. TKK says:
    @Jake

    Ron’s Jewish heritage gets a pass?
    Why?

    • Replies: @Wally
  187. Ron Unz says:

    FYI…

  188. @Germanicus

    Just a bit pick…. It is not being a utility that makes a business ripe for regulation (beyond health and safety or fair employment contracts). After all there is no need to regulate the businesses that compete to fill up your heating oil tank. Monopoly and importance to the economy or society perhaps.

  189. @Wally

    There is plenty of proof he invaded Holland, Denmark, Norway, Poland, and even Russia, or at least White Russia. There is no proof at all that he had a normal sex life. Ask his kids.

    Who said anything about restricting freedom of speech? I don’t even believe in income taxes.

    You’re not the “Wally” who ran for president two years ago on YouTube, are you?

    • Replies: @Wally
  190. @Alden

    A funny dust-up between Ann Coulter and David Horowitz occurred a few years ago. She knocked the Truman Administration for being soft on Communism. He countered that his family actually was communist, and life suddenly got much harder for them once Truman took over.

    Which suggests it was somewhat easy before.

    • Replies: @Alden
  191. If Amazon has banned the book you’re looking for, America Free Press or Institute of Historic Review probably has it.

    • Replies: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  192. @CanSpeccy

    I too (unnecessarily) provided him with that idea but it seems to have fallen into some software hole afflicting UR in recent days. Probably Mossad… Yes, it really is time someone capitalised on the niche which the banners are creating.

  193. Anon[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @Skeptikal

    Actually quite sophisticated for one using a foreign language I thought.

  194. Lot says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I doubt it is the personal decision of Bezos, but simply common sense he’d approve if his underlings thought they’d need his approval.

    Maybe the best argument, but not made by Unz, is that these Euro countries with speech restrictions effectively apply them here since multinationals don’t like keeping track and will just follow the harsh ones.

    I still wouldn’t agree here, but Chinese censorship concerns me for this reason since it goes mich further than the typical EU law.

  195. Lot says:
    @jacques sheete

    I agree, there is a double standard that permits anti-white and anti-Christian speech in corporate America and I hope that changes.

  196. Gg Mo says:
    @anon

    See: Adam Green at Y T to witness “martyr” A.Jones

  197. @obwandiyag

    I find it astonishing that anybody thinks that “McCarthyism” needs defending. Astounding that defenders should be attacked.

    The man’s main error was in underestimating the threat.

  198. @Wizard of Oz

    I hope that Ron does it. He’s one of the few people who has earned enough Geld to use the bullies’ legal procedure against them even if it’s a deliberately costly and protracted process.

  199. An amazing and seminal effort for a webzine article by Mr. Unz. Is there an equivalent to The Pulitzer Prize for a webzine article?

  200. @Carroll Price

    I hope that you are not insinuating that you have made some kind of point.

  201. @Wizard of Oz

    The Post Office has, I believe, a different rate for newspapers “printed material?” and perhaps books which, if universally applied is a bit harder to object to. My understanding is that Amazon separately negotiated a lower rate specifically for their goods and that is, on its face, a problem.
    The USPS motive was of course was to damage UPS, whose taxes subsidize the Post Office.

    The insolence of these fuckers knows no bounds, does it?

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @jacques sheete
  202. @Grace Poole

    Thank you for some interesting quotes. Did you notice that they substantially answer my quoted question in the negative. I have come to understand political thinking pretty well and, having had relations well to the left of the Roosevelts who were Communists with inherited money in the 30s and 40s I think I understand the Roosevelt reasoning without having to see him as a crypto–Com.

    My interest in Roosevelt was initially in assessing whether he did or did not follow Keynes’s sound advice. (He didn’t). Eventually I read Roy Jenkins 186 page biography in the series curated by Arthur J. Schlesinger Jr. Nothing about sympathies by a Hudson River Roosevelt for the Soviet Union. However, let me proffer the nice old New England WASP joke that Jenkins couldn’t resist including. A propos of the social custom of that tribe calling each other Cousin Eleanor, Cousin Franklin etc it was said that there was an Armenian family of such ancestral antiquity that they always referred to Jesus’s mother as Cousin Mary.

    • Replies: @Alden
  203. Alden says:
    @Bill Jones

    Books and media rate is about half the rate of the same weight package of other things.

  204. Alden says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    I despise David Horowitz. He was CPUSA liaison and an early organizer of the Oakland Blsck Panthers. When they planned to kill him and others in the organization he quit both parties and instead of being a communist agent, he became an Israeli agent.

    Black Panthers were another gift of LBJ/Nixon war on poverty program. They were students at Merrit community college in Oakland when the war on poverty program found, funded and organized them with a great deal of help from 3rd generation communist David Israel Uber Alles

    Just one more reason I’m not a conservative but an anti affirmative action White Nationalist

  205. Che Guava says:
    @Anon

    I will add, there is no Hollywood film, there is a Brit. production, I want to see it, never have, have for many years, and it seems to have been banned for a long time. I have only ever seen stills.

    In or near the year 1984, there was a (Brit.) remake, parts OK, but with a an ugly pop-culture association (Annie Lennox, I swear that she resembles a crow with a hurt beak).

    However, the music of Annie and her friend Dave was (mainly) not there.

    I would repeat myself, Terry Gilliam did a much better version of the theme of 1984 with Brazil.

  206. Well I never tasted any blood in my matzah, why do you think they stopped the practice of killing christian children to use their blood?

    Obviously, the ritual murder of Christian children for their blood was viewed with enormous disfavor by the local Gentile population, and the widespread belief in its existence remained a source of bitter tension between the two communities, flaring up occasionally when a Christian child mysteriously disappeared at a particular time of year, or when a body was found that exhibited suspicious types of wounds or showed a strange loss of blood.

    This is hilarious, the entire premise of the “one god” part of Judaism, and the Issac and Abraham story was to stop the ritual child sacrifice to deities, like that of the deity Baal, and also practiced by other tribes in the world, (the incas in South America) so Abraham sacrificed the ram, rather than Issac, in Islam it is Ismael. It is the first tenant of the one god of judaism.

    How can you seriously write something like that, you are taking that professor out of context, he was talking about a trial in the middle ages, where a Jews was accused. To accuse in book form any religion of child murder, should be banned.
    Child sacrifice was widly practiced before the Jews came along and stopped it. Everyone knows the Abraham, Issac story, like everyone, and what it means. Everyone but you. If a tenant of the religion is to save a child, what they still kept doing it. Furthermore blood is not eaten from animals never mind humans, Jewish kosher laws call for the illumination of blood from the meat using salt.

    • LOL: Che Guava
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Alden
    , @Alden
  207. Wally says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    I see you dodged what I really said, which was:

    Clearly you mean the man for which the claims of his impossible “holocaust” cannot be proven, in fact have been easily and thoroughly debunked.
    No wonder Zionists like you demand laws against free speech.

    I never said anything the about understandable & deserved military actions on “Holland, Denmark, Norway, Poland, and even Russia”. Just another typical Zionist strawman.

    And yes, Zionist like you do want free speech restricted, in fact they have restricted free speech. Pay attention.

    Only a pervert is interested in Hitler’s sex life.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @David Baker
  208. Che Guava says:
    @Anon

    The holohoax didn’t really ‘ramp up’ until the 1980s. Eric Blair was long dead by then. He certainly wrote nothing or just about nothing on it.

    The unit he was with in Spain was Trotskyite, and he clearly retained Trot sympathies (Snowball in Animal Farm, Goldstein in 1984, both represent Trotsky). That may be the source of his blind spot on such points.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  209. @Alden

    Great comment.

    FDR was a skunk.

  210. Wally says:
    @TKK

    Because it deserves to get a pass.

    Haven’t you been reading? .

  211. Ron Unz says:
    @Fran Taubman

    How can you seriously write something like that, you are taking that professor out of context, he was talking about a trial in the middle ages, where a Jews was accused.

    Well, what do I know? I’m just a software developer…

    But Ariel Toaff of Bar-Ilan University in Israel is one of the world’s foremost scholarly authorities on Medieval and Renaissance Jewry and himself son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome.

    He spent many years of diligent research in producing his book, based on extensive review of primary and secondary sources in eight different languages, working in conjunction with his various grad students and academic colleagues. Personally, I found the analysis in his 500 page book pretty persuasive, and I’d suggest that you just order a copy and decide for yourself, but as I said, Amazon just banned it. However, you can still read the discussions by Israel Shamir and others that I linked upthread.

    And as discussed in the Lindemann books, there were actually high-profile cases well into the late 19th century, providing fairly convincing details, with the last trial held in 1913 Ukraine.

  212. @Bill Jones

    The insolence of these fuckers knows no bounds, does it?

    Nope.

    You may already know this, but not only was Gerard Swope pres of General Electric back in the ’30s, but he was essentially a Commie and held several positions in FDR’s admin and was a dictator like great centralizer of American businesses. He also had sufficient power to get a special law passed by con-gress for his personal benefit relieving him of liability for an inheritance or some other tax!

    Here’s a good article about the Swope Plan for industry in the Commie States of Amerika, courtesy of Mr Unz.:

    The Swope Plan for Industry
    The Outlook
    , September 30, 1931, p. 139

  213. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Arthur Scheslinger jr was a Kennedy family and democrat party propagandist. Some call him a Kennedy hagiographer. Anything he wrote about FDR, Kennedy’s and the Democrat party should be read with a great deal of sceptisn.

    The whole crypto Jew theories about anyone are just conspiracy theories. There were and are plenty of liberal
    Anti Whites in the American government who weren’t crypto Jews such as Supreme Court justices Warren and Brennan.

    It’s astonishing to me that an American president would hire and appoint to so many high positions communists known to be communists unless he knew what he was doing.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  214. @Grace Poole

    People who employ, as an all-around epithet and conversation wet blanket, phrases like “Hitler fascism” should summon in the listener’s / reader’s mind’s eye the image of the town idiot, wearing a Dunce cap.

    They do not have a clue what they are talking about.

    Amen.

    Ron Unz said it best, above, “ritualistic denunciation,”

    Today’s ritualistic denunciations of McCarthyism are made by ignorant journalists who derive their understanding of the past from misleading Hollywood dramas…

    That’s true but far too kind. Anyway, the same applies to Hitler and many others and I’d call their critics scribblers, not journalists, who derive their bonehead ideas not only from Hollywood dramas but from schooling slop and mass media sewage.

  215. Alden says:
    @Fran Taubman

    You forget that Issac was a Jew and what applies to Jews doesn’t apply to the unclean sub human goyim.

    The whole brisk sucking the blood and the human sacrifice is extremely weird considering the insane menstrual taboos like not sitting next to a strange woman on a bus train or plane because she might be menstruating. Or menstruated last week or might menstruate next week.

  216. @Ron Unz

    yeah I did not really care about that stuff, put the ritual murder is way too much, plus it is my lineage, and does not make sense, the Jews weren’t the Vikings, although I would personally have preferred to be a Viking than a Jew. I thought the Golem story was the most far out I had heard. I did a quick wikipedia search and it said that he was talking about a specific case, that it did not represent Ashkenazi Jews or rituals, like maybe a serial killer.
    I will read it you can get it pdf on line I think.
    With regards to McCarthy the problem with him was not whether the communist claim was accurate, it was that he was abusing his power in a very offensive way. What brought him down was Roy Cohen, who you will be thrilled to find out was an awful really awful Jew and a closet homosexual, he fancied a certain soldier I cannot remember his name and wanted him transferred to be closer (you can google it) when the army refused, it was a pretty pernicious request. Cohen’s revenge was to call the army communist, it was a total smear in that particular case, and that is when the Secretary in the famous “have you know decency” came from.
    I have no knowledge of the other things that you write, I never heard of the ADL doing the FBI’s dirty work, it also makes no sense to me, but you are really into smearing Jews beyond recognition so it fits your narrative.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @fnn
  217. Alden says:
    @Johnny Rico

    Adolph Berle was a very wealthy attorney scholar writer and proponent of the moderate socialism of Mussolini and FDR.

    He was a life long friend and advisor of FDR. He was assistant Secretary of State during the 1930s. He soon noted the excessive number of communists in the state department. He investigated.

    In 1936 37? He went to FDR with the evidence names, proof , results of his investigation and FDR outright refused to do anything about the communists in his state department. The communists had not come in through the civil service system but were all appointeded Roosevelt personally.

    I wasn’t sure if the year Berle went to Roosevelt with proof that so many of FDR’s personal appointees were communist so I looked on Berle’s wikepedia entry. Absolutely nothing about Berle’s investigation of communists in the state department

    That’s one reason I don’t believe Wikipedia entries, especially anything about communists black crime immigration and communism. Wikipedia is as much liberal propaganda as Rachel Maddow and Al sharpton. Why people who claim to be well informed, educated and sophisticated cite Wikipedia I don’t understand

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @fnn
  218. Alden says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Go get all dressed up for your Hadassah luncheon and buy a $3,000 dress on a credit card for the next ADL fund raiser. Nag your husband into making a big pledge he can’t afford. Then complain that your kid didn’t get into Stanford because of anti semitism

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  219. Ron Unz says:
    @Alden

    He soon noted the excessive number of communists in the state department.

    One of the most amusing tidbits from the Venona books was that in 1940-something, Kim Philby, the Soviet spy, found out about the US counter-espionage operation working to decipher the Soviet codes and identify the Soviet spies. And just a few months later, the White House issued a direct order to terminate the operation and destroy all records of Soviet espionage.

    The only reason we actually have the Venona Decrypts and are aware of all those foreign spies is that the military officer in charge of the intelligence operation risked a court-martial by disobeying the direct White House order and kept his unit going.

  220. Alden says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    BFD I don’t like blacks because they hate me. The men sexually harass me I hate it and I hate them for doing it.

    The women are just vicious evil harpies who rule every workplace they waddle into and make life miserable for the White women who have to work with them.

    Blacks are a criminal White hating evil vicious group of people

    You are a sanctimonious asshole who has never been around blacks much.

    They hate Whites including you Who the F are you to say we can’t hate them.

  221. @Rational

    b. Boycott amazon.

    Some years ago, the editors at Slashdot boycotted Amazon (IIRC because they disapproved of certain Amazon patents), and always linked to Barnes and Noble instead.

    I wondered how easy it would be to boycott booksellers who want to control what we can read.

    I picked the Nation of Islam’s book on Leo Frank, because I was impressed by Mr Unz’s review, and it appears to be a serious work by a professional historian.

    You can buy the book by following links from the NoI website, ending up at https://store.finalcall.com/collections/the-secret-relationship-between-blacks-and-jews/products/the-secret-relationship-between-blacks-and-jews-volume-3?variant=21594874945

    Anyone who has attempted publishing will know that sales depend on wide distribution to numerous booksellers. So, where else can you buy the book?

    The author, for the sake of his career, had the good sense to remain anonymous. This makes searches by author more difficult than usual, although you can try “Nation of Islam” or “Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam”.

    The easiest search is using the ISBN. The book has:
    – ISBN 10: 0963687786
    – ISBN 13: 9780963687784

    With this information it is possible to discover that the book is not carried by Barnes and Noble, or by Powells.

    In the UK the book has recently been pulled by Amazon (Google has a cached page dated 9th February). W H Smith and its subsidiary Waterstones dominate the UK book trade. Neither offers the book. The response is not “out of stock”, or “enquire with the publisher” – it is as if the book does not exist, and never existed. It has been memory-holed.

    It is possible that the NoI do not get their titles listed at Nielsen – perhaps someone with a Nielsen account could check. If so, this would be a possible innocent explanation for the absence of the book in searches.

    In any case, a boycott of Amazon would be pointless. The rot runs far deeper than just one company, albeit a powerful one. And the company would wear the boycott, by people it regards as wing-nuts, as a badge of honour.

    There is a Wikipedia page for “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews” (volume 1 of the NoI series). Volume 3, the Leo Frank book, merits a paragraph, which provides a rather selective synopsis:

    Volume Three of The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews was published in 2016, with the subtitle “Leo Frank, the Lynching of a Guilty Man”. According to the Anti-Defamation League, Volume Three asserts that “early 20th century ‘Jewish businessmen’ worked to subjugate black people and enrich themselves by masterminding the rebirth of the Ku Klux Klan”. The book also alleges that “Jews were secretly responsible for the lynching of Leo Frank”.

  222. @Lot

    Amazon doesn’t want antisemitic business, good for them putting morality over profits.

    I have a good deal of sympathy for that point of view, because I believe in freedom of association.

    BUT (yes, there’s always a ‘BUT’)…

    Amazon is a listed entity, and its management has a fiduciary duty to maximise shareholder value – and to do precisely nothing else.

    It does not get to do shit on a whim, nor does it get to use shareholder value to express its infatuations or its virtue.

    And it does not matter a single solitary fuck if Bezos has 99.5% of the shares on issue and agrees with everything the company does: if what it does is not EPS-accretive, then management is violating its fiduciary duty.

    That said: the readership of these types of books is sufficiently small, that the downside risk to revenue from refusing to stock them, is almost certainly less than the downside risk to revenue that could result from a campaign designed to boycott AMZN if they continue to stock them.

    (In other words, those who are aggrieved at AMZN’s actions are nowhere near as numerous, vocal or active as those who are aggrieved at AMZN’s stocking of the ‘offending’ material)

    On balance then, it’s an actuarially-defensible course of action by management: the foregone revenue is effectively an insurance premium against being the target of a boycott.

    Extortion works, so long as it represents a credible threat.

    The term “antisemitic business” is also a very inaccurate choice of phrasing – a moment’s thought will tell you that people who hold views that Zionists don’t like, don’t just buy books, Nazi paraphernalia, Pepe t-shirts and so forth… they also buy kayaks, running shoes, trackballs and protein powder, birthday cards etc etc etc.

    AMZN is perfectly happy to take antisemites’ money – just not for products that carry a risk of generating a significant backlash.

    • Agree: Wizard of Oz
  223. Alden says:
    @Ron Unz

    Wow, just wow. Did you ever read the chapter in one of George Kennan’s books about Eleanor supervising the destruction of the Russian department files in the state department?

    One good thing about the left’s hatred of White men, FDR has been dethroned along with the other American presidents Plus the Jews are now blaming him for the holocaust. So the blessed saviors Saints Franklin and Eleanor are going the way of other dead Whites.

    • Replies: @Wally
  224. Anonymous[166] • Disclaimer says:

    This degradation of our intellectual world saddens me, but there may be an upside: often banning books garners them more attention than they would have had. If we could get all the banned books available together on some site it could be a nucleus for preserving the knowledge while also revealing the character of the censors ideology and what they fear.

  225. @Kevin Barrett

    I honor Mr. Farrakhan for his courage in speaking the truth about Jewish power in the US. He’s also to be admired for helping to instill discipline in folks that need it. I don’t agree with everything he says, but to me that in no way outweighs good things he does. In my book he’s a million time better than the traitorous Christian preachers who take money from and promote Israel.

    Islam taking over the US is a red herring it ain’t going to happen any time soon. We’ve got much bigger fish to fry that worrying about that.

  226. utu says:

    Books on inconvenient Jewish subjects has been vanishing since the WWII. The first purge and library cleansing was done by Bolsheviks in the USSR which was the first official anti-anti-Semitic state where a possession of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion or any “anti-Semitic” literature was a capital offense. Then after the WWII libraries were cleansed in the Soviet Block and in the Western Europe.

    How many excellent books that were written in the 19 century and the first half of the 20 century were completely forgotten? There is no anthology of these books. Is this literature going to be irretrievably lost? I suspect that even authors like E. Michael Jones or Michael A. Hoffman could construct only a fragmentary list of these books.

  227. @Wally

    Only a pervert is interested in Hitler’s sex life.

    Family life. Where was his? Didn’t Germany need more children?

    understandable & deserved military actions on “Holland, Denmark, Norway, Poland, and even Russia”

    You left out the United States. So Pearl Harbor was justified? Not Germans, just their beloved allies.

    The discussion was about early National Socialists and German Zionists. By calling me a “Zionist”– just because my opinion of Arabs is even lower than that of Jews?– you’re saying I agree with the early National Socialists. Then you throw a hissy fit because I brought up their disastrous change in leadership.

    Your bringing up “Holocaust”– a word I don’t use– was the real strawman.

    • Replies: @Wally
  228. Alden says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Have you never read a book either pro or con about McCarthy? The boyfriends name was David Schine. You are soooo out of your depth trying to argue with people like myself whose immersed myself for 40 years in studying American communists in some of the greatest university libraries in the country.

    My leftist parents were preaching the same pro communist anti McCarthy garbage you are when I was 10 years old . I believed it because that was all I heard. Then I grew up and read pro and con books about McCarthy and made my own judgement:

    McCarthy was right and he only discovered the tip of the iceberg

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  229. Trupright says:
    @Michael Hoffman

    It appears that Abebooks.com still sells the “Secret Relationship” title. Might be good to support them.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  230. Ron Unz says:
    @Trupright

    It appears that Abebooks.com still sells the “Secret Relationship” title. Might be good to support them.

    Well, they’re owned by Amazon, so I doubt it will be there very much longer…

  231. @Alden

    well thats cool. I never doubted any of what McCarthy said, with all of your depth, you missed my point about his abuse of power, the Shine/Cohen story is true, It was what brought him down.

    • Replies: @Alden
  232. wayfarer says:

    “Lifting the Veil on Big Tech, Censorship, and Neverland”

  233. @Lot

    ‘Amazon doesn’t want antisemitic business, good for them putting morality over profits.

    It is wonderful that our free country gives us such choice.’

    If it were anyone else uttering these words, I’d be impressed by the biting sarcasm.

    As it’s Lot the Zionist, I suspect he’s entirely serious.

  234. @anon

    ‘…much like the Frank case, the Jews also denied denied denied that the Rosenbergs were guilty of spying…’

    Yeah. There’s always been this weird tacit implication that in some unspecified way, the Rosenbergs were martyrs rather than the heinous traitors they were. It’s interesting.

    • Replies: @Alden
  235. @Alden

    OT but your opening reminds me of Schlesinger’s recording in his journals that RFK thought the JFK assination might be down to the mob or Cuba

    https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/10/was-bobby-kennedy-a-jfk-conspiracy-theorist-111729

    Quote….Arthur Schlesinger Jr., a close friend of the Kennedy family, would disclose years later that he was told by Robert Kennedy in December 1963, a month after the president’s murder, that the former attorney general worried that the assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was “part of a larger plot, whether organized by Castro or by gangsters.”

    As to FDR “knowing what he was doing” I suspect that the devious charming upper class FDR, supported also by the reality of presidential power, thought he could use others much better than they could manipulate him. And the cliché about better to have them on the inside pissing out comes to mind as an observation he might have made.

    Also allowing for the way people thought back then (before the post-WW2 time when an in-law of mine was sacked by Rupert Murdoch’s father for his Communist affiliations) it is easy to see people being indulgent of what might have been regarded as youthful folly preserved, amusingly if mostly unfortunately, into what should have been years of discretion. Personal charm, even entertaining chutzpah, would have counted. I wonder if Harry Dexter White was charming. No doubt a number of the Cambridge 5 – not one of whom was ever prosecuted – were.

    So I wouldn’t accept that FDR had Communist sympathies or, by the time Bullitt had become disillusioned, any sympathies for Soviet ways. That he deluded himself he could deal with Stalin rather like Trump with Kim – or Putin or Xi- I could believe.

    • Replies: @Alden
  236. @Achmed E. Newman

    ‘…Mr. Unz, though I don’t always agree with you, you are a beacon of light by allowing those to publish otherwise banned truths (along with some Commie rubbish) that would not easily see the light of day otherwise, as you explain here.

    I appreciate your defense of Senator Joe McCarthy too. I will add here that Miss Ann Coulter came to his defense in one of her books close to a decade ago…’

    Jack Kennedy defended McCarthy as well, calling him ‘a great American,’ if I recall aright.

    It’s one of those details that gets erased in the interests of tidying up the past and making it simple and clear-cut.

  237. Refusing to sell the books is not the same as them not existing: it reduces the “found it by accident” audience and the “got shown it by a recommender” audience, but it’s not going to change the “Y’all should read this book” audience.

    Remember the time before the internet existed? Even more relevantly, remember the time when the internet existed, but there was no such thing as a recommender system?

    During both those dark times, people found out about Nock, Rothbard, Spooner, Proudhon, Bakunin, Bastiat, Mises, Hayek, Hoppe etc… usually because someone who had read them said “Hey, I read this thing the other day“…

    These days, that personal recommendation plus 3 minutes on a search engine will get you to a place to purchase whatever book – from hate-literature like the Babylonian Talmud all the way through the spectrum to a downloadable copy of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion… and everything in between.

    The mechanisms for telling people things have never been more widely available – and nowadays those mechanisms have a built-in global reach.

    You can literally reach the entire Remnant (to use Gary North’s phrase) and tell them about the badthink book, and where to find it.

    My favourite example (bear with me: this has to be set up properly): there is a key communication between two senior English politicians cited in Busch’s Britain, India and the Arabs (1971). The excerpt below makes it abundantly clear that the British hierarchy was specifically planning to keep the region destabilised –

    What we want is not a united Arabia, but a weak and disunited Arabia, split into little principalities as far as possible under our suzerainty — but incapable of coordinated action against us, forming a buffer against the Powers in the West.” Crewe to Hardinge, 12 November 1914, Archives of India (quoted in Busch, Britain, India and the Arabs p62)

    How many people with an interest in Western-Arab relations would you think had read that excerpt prior to the advent of the internet? Best guess: maybe a few hundred – graduate students in history, mostly.

    By contrast, that very excerpt met more than 8,000 sets of eyes as a result of three comments I made on the internet. That has nothing whatsoever to do with me – it is a function of the extraordinary level of communication that is facilitated by the internet.

    Note: not AMZN, not GOOG, not FB, not TWTR… just the plain ol’ internet.

    People who grew up in the era of automatically-large audiences don’t know how good they’ve got it.

    Besides…

    A significant part of the reason that a bunch of alt-righters are getting their panties in a twist about getting soundly beaten in the tactical side of things, is because they can’t make as much money outside of the ‘FAPTA’ ecosphere (FAPTA: Facebook, Alphabet, Patreon, Twitter, Amazon… usually it’s FANTA, but Netflix is irrelevant in this context).

    It’s not that these whiney bitches hold some deep and abiding belief in truth or whatever-the-fuck… it’s all about the Benjamins, baby! (alternatively: dollah dollah dollah, bitch!)

    Bear in mind: but for Patreon, Jordan Peterson would be yet another regional psychocharlatan making it clear that he does not know his arse from a hot rock. Patreon gave an obvious charlatan, the financial freedom to “swing his arms”: not quite “Fuck You” money, but reasonably close. If Peterson was a hard-left charlatan instead of a squishy-pretend-right crypto-Leftist, the alt-right would be braying about how stupid people are for subsidising his shit.

    Anyhow… as others have said in this thread, alternatives to FAPTA have very small ‘reach’, and so provide relatively low leverage (low RoI on promotion) for lazy cunts.

    What this shows is that the alt-right whiners have a very high discount rate. They are behaving as if the current “distribution channels” that enable them to “monetise” their “content”, are the only such channels that will ever exist.

    They want the leverage of a large audience, even if it means arguing against their own principles by forcing a private enterprise to host, distribute, or otherwise facilitate things that it would rather not.

    (I might think that the management of these enterprises are making a strategic error, but it’s hard to argue that their behaviour violates their roles as fiduciaries: they know that if they don’t do what the Left is demanding, the Left will screech and boycott… whereas if they do what the Left demands, the alt-Right will whine).

    The ‘de-platformed’ also want as large (and lucrative) an audience as possible, and don’t want to have to do anything to garner that audience except bloviate about whatever’s on their minds.

    It’s a natural desire, but it doesn’t entail that the platform is obliged to continue to provide it.

    Contrast this with someone I admire: Joe Rogan.

    [MORE]

    He has a massive audience nowadays – among the most popular podcasts in the world – but that audience was built over the best part of a decade.

    Rogan was already kinda-famous (because of Fear Factor and UFC), but his podcast grew organically.

    To begin with it was him and Brian Redban, and a few of their friends: Joey Diaz, Duncan Trussell, Ari Shaffir.

    Nate Diaz put him over the top with “Train by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night… all day!” after Diaz beat B.J. Penn in UFC 137… back in 2011.

    Instant catchphrase – almost as good as “I’m Rick James, bitch!“.

    Back in the day Rogan had maybe 250 people listening live (and not on YouTube: they didn’t have live streams at that point). He had been going for over a year when he managed to get sponsored by Fleshlight (in 2010).

    By the time JRE started broadcasting live on YouTube, he already had millions of listeners.

    Do you think Rogan would give a shit if YouTube deplatformed him?

    Fuck no: he doesn’t rely on passers-by, is why.

    He could put that shit up on his own site and he would still get a million listeners (and not have to share the revenue)… more people want to shoot the shit with Powerful Joe Rogan, than want to give a talk to the Ted-cult (seriously – Ted is 50,000 times worse than Scientology).

    Roger Penrose was a guest on Rogan. Roger.Motherfucking.Penrose… FRS.

    Imagine if Feynman had still been alive.

    But I digress…

    Picking another of my favourites: Stefan Molyneux.

    His stuff was originally entirely hosted on his own site, and grew marvellously – the whole “If you build it,. they will come (CODA: so long as it’s not shit)”.

    His schtick was mostly philosophy, back in the day. (2005-2015, roughly).

    Philosophy? There’s an audience for a guy talking about philosophy for 90 minutes at a time? In 2009?

    These days Molyneux has a learned dependence on YouTube (I don’t think he gives much of a shit about Facebook, Twitter or Patreon). Wasn’t always the case.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  238. @Wally

    The entire Jewish “Holocaust” consists of nothing more than a visceral, histrionic reaction by Jews toward any attempt to verify it. Once this event is subjected to western jurisprudence, with witnesses and experts testifying under oath and cross examined by a competent defense attorney, it dissolves into a rehash of War Atrocity Propaganda, rumors, fabrications and exaggerations.

    • Replies: @Wally
  239. Wally says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Yawn. You still haven’t said why you called Hitler a “psychotic faggot”. LOL

    Another desperate Zionist strawman, I said nothing off Pearl Harbor, you did. LOL

    You may not use the word “holocaust” here, because you know you’ll be slapped silly trying it; so what word DO you use then, ‘shoah‘? LOL

    No one said anything about you & National Socialism, yet another desperate strawman by you. LOL

    You’re infantile babbling reveals your low IQ. LOL

    Bye.

  240. @Ron Unz

    It would be interesting to know the terms of the correspondence to and from the White House which might have resulted in the intended destruction. And what other destructions were ordered. After all it is unlikely to have been expressed in terms of the President wanting the destruction of all proofs that the Soviet Union might have been spying on the American government. Where do you suggest looking? Assuming FDR was no Comm and not entirely naive, the motives – if they were FDR’s – that come to mind include avoiding embarrassing revelations about some people he personally caused to be appointed.

  241. @Alden

    Usually I would not answer something like this but it is too funny, I am not married, I live on a remote Island with a couple of dogs, and I wear the same clothes for weeks until they smell, I work in a metal shop. Got to laugh, don’t you just love that. Now don’t go calling me a liar that is not fair. This whole website is a web of lies.

    • Replies: @Alden
  242. Wally says:
    @David Baker

    Well said, DB.
    This quote has it covered as well:

    The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

    Only lies require censorship, as Ron Unz has just made clear again.

    Thanks.

    http://www.codoh.com

  243. @Che Guava

    Actually, the basic elements of the Holohoax were “Ramped Up” during the Zionist campaign to compel Jews to emigrate to Palestine, which reached its peak after the Versailles Treaty–in conjunction with the Balfour Declaration–cleared the way for Britain to annex Palestine, and fulfill their ‘obligation’ to aid the Zionist agenda. People should read how many times the “6 million Jews” figure was published prior to WWII, included with the term “Holocaust”.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  244. Wally says:
    @Alden

    “Plus the Jews are now blaming him for the holocaust.”

    Must be yet another income stream for Jews.

    There was no so called “holocaust” to blame anyone for.
    The impossible just doesn’t happen whether Jews like it or not.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Alden
  245. @Lot

    Yeah, it is wonderful for Jews and their accomplices. Not very good for everyone else. But then why should Jewry care about everyone else?

  246. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says:

    Ron,
    Thanks from a regular guy who just wants to know the truth and wants everyone to lead a fufilling decent life, irregardless of origin. Appreciate the reading and thought that went into this and will reread. God bless from Tennessee.

  247. Ron Unz: “Amazon today possesses a near-total monopoly over Internet book sales, and if American society continues to allow it to ban serious works of scholarship on political or ideological grounds, our future intellectual freedom has already been lost.” (emphasis added)

    This is the kernel of the problem; not Amazon’s censorship per se, but American society’s tolerance, and indeed, tacit and overt endorsement of it. Just as American whites seem entirely at peace with their own looming racial extinction as a price they are willing to pay to sustain social order, censorship also seems no big deal to them. After all, the widespread de-platforming and censorship aren’t exactly secrets. Anyone inclined to protect freedom of thought and speech is already aware of such things, or can easily find them out with very little trouble. But concern? Little to none. In a society heavily shaped by its Christian past, one in which God is Love, no one wants to be identified with Hate, or to be its champion. All of the books listed by Unz can be fatally marked with the scarlet “H”, which is nowadays just as much a stigma as the Puritan scarlet “A” ever was in colonial America. It’s important to notice that at work here are Christian ethics in ancient form. When classical civilization was destroyed during the Christian takeover almost two thousand years ago, there was widespread burning of books by the Christian zealots. Ignorance was deemed holy, and secular knowledge fell into disrepute as the domain of the devil, sorcerers, and the demon-possessed. There’s only one blogger I’m aware of who concerns himself mainly with this problem, and has coined the word “neo-Christian” to describe it:

    https://chechar.wordpress.com/

    White tolerance and endorsement of Amazon’s censorship is a necessary precondition of its existence. Bezos would never have dared do this over the objections of the vast majority of whites. He thinks they approve, and you know what? He’s right.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  248. @Skeptikal

    Fauxcahontas.

    Please try to keep up.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  249. Alden says:

    Ancient Sumerians Egyptians Greeks Roman’s Armenians Persians etc didn’t have books they had rolled up scrolls.

    Books, pages bound between covers were developed by Christian middle eastern Syrian monks around 450 500 AD. They also invented chapters chapter headings paragraphs table of contents around that time.

    Get yourself a friends of the library card at your major state university or else get copies of books from the library of Congress. It doesn’t cost much. You can punch holes in the left margin and put them in a binder. I’m pretty sure the library of Congress isn’t allowed to throw out books.

    A great great source of anti communist books is Catholic colleges and universities. That was the church’s big crusade 1918 to 1990z They didn’t go Marxist until decades after the secular universities did

    I wish I could remember authors and titles so you all could order them from the library of Congress copy service Sorry

    Occidental observer and IHR sells books. Henry Makow is kind of nuts but he has an excellent excellent anti commie library. Everything he’s written about communism checks out with what I know is true. So he’s very reliable. Check out his work on communist Betty Friedan connections with the young socialist college clubs and commie dominated IBEW. That might be the reason the anti White commie judges never destroyed the electricians like they did the other trades.

    And ignore Wikipedia except for names and dates.

    It’s nice to know the enemy but the enemy has won and we have lost. There really was never a fight between Whites and anti White communists.

    • Replies: @Grahamsno(G64)
  250. Alden says:
    @Wally

    At least the left no longer considers him the savior. The blacks are after him too because his programs were for everybody no special affirmative action for blacks.

  251. Alden says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Sorry for making the wrong assumptions. Living on a remote island might be the reason you’re so uninformed about the civil war and McCarthy

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  252. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Thing is, I’ve immersed myself in the communist movement in the USA for decades. It’s impossible to believe that Roosevelt appointed so many communists and sympathetizers unknowingly.

    Bear in mind that they didn’t apply for civil service jobs and sneak in gradually. FDR personally appointed them. White was assist sec treasury. How did he get hold of the currency plates plus formulas for the paper and ink to send to Stalin? FDR personally appointed White and refused to listen when Adolph Berle confronted him(FDR) about White’s communism.

    My information about American communists is deep and broad the result of decades of research in great libraries. Your’s is not. So I’m not going to get into an argument about it. I know what I know. If you don’t believe me I don’t care. My knowledge of American communism is useless anyway. It hasn’t helped me or my fellow idiot Whites. I might as well have spent all those years watching Oprah

  253. Alden says:
    @Colin Wright

    Their 70 year old sons with the weird name Meeripol are still running around college campuses claiming their parents were innocent. I read the local Jewish publications sometimes. Current excuse is that the Russians were well in their way to the bomb and the information provided by the Rosenbergs didn’t help that much. So they weren’t really traitors and of course were only fighting for the rights of labor and unions and civil rights etc

    One thought I’ve always had about David Greenglass.

    1 He was a skilled experienced machinist with management experience, well qualified to work in the Los Alamos machine shop that actually physically made the bomb prototype.

    2 but there were probably a hundred thousand skilled experienced machinists in America at the time.

    3 exactly how did it happen that the only skilled experienced machinist in America whose communist sister and brother in-law were Russian spies and belonged to Russian spy rat line able to get Greenglass’ information to Moscow

    Logical conclusion; there were more Russian spies than loyal Americans in charge at Los Alamos

    Off topic for Janites Gywneth Paltrow’s Emma is on Netflix again. Mrs Elton is worse than I remembered

    • Replies: @Hamlet's Ghost
  254. Alden says:
    @Fran Taubman

    There was a lot more than that. There was a real CPUSA army officer McCarthy exposed. But the liberals discounted it. Truman fired a few of the thousands of communists working for the feds.

    It’s hard for just one man to go up against Jewish commie power. Hoover never did although he was more powerful than presidents for a while.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  255. Cowboy says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “Bezos would never have dared do this over the objections of the vast majority of whites. He thinks they approve, and you know what? He’s right.”

    The Gilet Jaune, MAGA, Brexit and events in Italy, Hungary and Poland illustrate that the “vast majority” do not agree. What we have had for decades is manufactured consent. This is the result of intimidation, not tolerance and certainly not approval.

    Of course US Jews, the “vast majority” of which live under Talmudic law, not Constitutional law, do approve of all this, but it has little to do with tolerance.

    Things now have advanced to the stage that speaking out may well cost you not only your job, but your entire career. Social Credit in China combined with the US tech industry doxing dissidents for tweets and comments going back over a decade illustrate where this is going. My liberal family members in California may all agree with the left that Trump is the devil incarnate, but they also all understand that the MSM has been feeding them manure for decades.

    This morning Facebook Bans Zero Hedge:

    “Alternatively, it is just as possible that Facebook simply decided to no longer allow its users to share our content in retaliation for our extensive coverage of what some have dubbed the platform’s “many problems”, including chronic privacy violations, mass abandonment by younger users, its gross and ongoing misrepresentation of fake users, ironically – in retrospect – its systematic censorship and back door government cooperation (those are just links from the past few weeks).”

  256. @Alden

    Deep and broad knowledge of the vast subject of Communism and Communists in America in the mid 20th century justifies you in putting up a serious hypothesis that Roosevelt must have known that a number of the people he put into public service jobs were Communists but that is no more than a reason for putting vastly more work into working out why?

    For starters. Have you put obvious search names and words into unearthing relevant papers from amongst the 17 million documents in the Franklin D. Roosevelt Archive (as at 2012)? Are you familiar with the documentscreferred to here as just declassified in 2012?

    “November 2012: Newly Declassified Documents from the Holdings of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library
    Newly declassified documents The National Archives and Records Administration recently declassified and returned to the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library 144 pages of documents from its holdings that had been previously been classified. These materials are from the President’s Secretary’s Files, the President’s Map Room Papers, and the Adolf A. Berle, Jr. Papers. These documents are now open and available for research. In addition to the viewable electronic copies available here, paper copies are located in a binder in the Library’s research room for easy consultation by our researchers. The original documents have been returned to the appropriate collections and files.

    The Roosevelt Library has no classified holdings at its facility in Hyde Park, New York. Less than 250 pages remain classified out of 17 million pages of manuscripts materials. These remaining classified items are in storage at the National Archives in Washington DC and will be undergoing further review in 2013 to determine their eligibility for declassification.”

    You are no doubt able to explain the significance of the intriguing reference to Adolf Berle…..

    Do you know if the remaining documents have been declassified?

    After that there would be the Berle, Bullitt and many other sets of papers.

    And here is a really simple question that you have not so far posed on UR: what threat to the United States did FDR think the purge wracked Soviet Union, or Communists, were to the United States. Is it even unlikely that he would have relished making jokes about Mellon and other political enemies having nightmares about Harry Dexter White leading peasants with pitchforks and torches to the gates of his mansion? It would of course be crediting him with too much prescience in the 30s to predict that the sacrifices of Stalin’s subjects in WW2 would be key to the US emerging after WW2 as the world’s superpower. But don’t let that last sally divert you from considering how Roosevelt may have, rationally at least if not perfectly correctly, assessed the danger from American Communists or the Soviet Union.

  257. Miro23 says:

    There’s a definite technological aspect to all this.

    Without the internet, Amazon could never offer the service that they do (or capture most of the book sales market). And having decision making centered on Jeff Bezos makes a much easier target for the censors than thousands of independent booksellers and publishers.

    It looks like the old story of centralized power.

    If quasi monopolies like Amazon, Google and Facebook were broken up and newly incorporated state by state (Amazon-Texas, Amazon-Montana etc.), local state decision making could influence censorship decisions. For example a political debate in California could result in Amazon California agreeing to the recent censorship, whereas Amazon Montana may reject it.

    In effect, Amazon California and Amazon Montana would show different book listing to their clients, and Shamir’s books could be found and purchased by checking round availability on different Amazon webs state by state.

    Amazon itself wouldn’t have much to say in it, since the public in each state would make the censor/not-censor decision (i.e. direct Democracy) and get the pressure off Jeff Bezos.

    It’s just the idea that participative local democracy (issue by issue direct democracy and voting) is more resistant to elite centralized corruption.

  258. Anon[206] • Disclaimer says:
    @ben sampson

    “True! but where do we go from here..
    ….
    I say break up the corporations”

    The problem with this idea is that ‘we’ have don’t have even a hint of a way to do it.

    So, what to do, that is what can be done just a few, let’s say with 100 people, right now, with no money?

    I don’t believe anything can be done until the stranglehold that the Jews’ have on the American mind, really the worldwide mind, is broken, and I think that there is a way to do that, with 100 people and no money.

    The Jews’ stranglehold on the American mind starts with the holohoax. What need to be done right now is to expose the holohoax. The way to do it is to picket, with leaflets, every holohoax museum, starting with the one in DC. Additionally any holohoax related events could be leafleted. The leaflet would have to be purely factual and not argumentative, so that it’s legality can be defended, it should present a few facts about the hoax, and a link to a web site where more information is presented, e.g. holohoax101.org.

    There would be legal challenges, etc., and that would be all to the better. I believe such a program has a good chance of ultimately breaking the hoax.

  259. @Alden

    Books, pages bound between covers were developed by Christian middle eastern Syrian monks around 450 500 AD. They also invented chapters chapter headings paragraphs table of contents around that time

    .

    Fascinating, thanks for the information. It turns out that codex (the technical name for the book format) was developed from the Roman wax tablet and it is said that Caesar adopted this format and is supposed to be one of the first men to use a ‘note book’.

    Even Books were invented by Europeans!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  260. Skeptikal says:

    Per Dr. Mercola’s website, YouTube has pulled videos that question the safety of vaccines.
    Also, Pinterest.

    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/03/12/vaccine-herd-immunity.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20190312Z1_UCM&et_cid=DM273523&et_rid=565963932

    Last week in the Columbia Journalism Review “Media” email feed Amazon was “accused” of using its algorithms to “curate” a group of books that contain “disinformation” about vaccines and other medical issues. So, who is “deciding” what is disinformation?
    Furthermore, as far as I can tell Amazon’s algorithms basicallly group things so that they are easier to access. In that sense they would to a certain extent recreate the function of a library’s card catalogue, or, indeed, library shelves, where like items are categorized and grouped. This enables the true browsing function, of looking around abecoming aware of th existence of items that one would not have known about if limited only to searches targeted to one specific item.

    In this sense I think such grouping by Amazon is an asset to the public and general intellectual growth. However, it is not an asset to the public if items are grouped only to be then buried forever.

  261. Anon[206] • Disclaimer says:
    @ben sampson

    “True! but where do we go from here..
    ….
    I say break up the corporations”

    The problem with this idea is that ‘we’ have don’t have even a hint of a way to do it.

    So, what to do, that is what can be done just a few, let’s say with 100 people, right now, with no money?

    I don’t believe anything can be done until the stranglehold that the Jews’ have on the American mind, really the worldwide mind, is broken, and I think that there is a way to do that, with 100 people and no money.

    The Jews’ stranglehold on the American mind starts with the holohoax. What need to be done right now is to expose the holohoax. The way to do it is to picket, with leaflets, every holohoax museum, starting with the one in DC. Additionally any holohoax related events could be leafleted. The leaflet would have to be purely factual and not argumentative, so that it’s legality can be defended, it should present a few facts about the hoax, and a link to a web site where more information is presented, e.g. holohoax101.org.

    There would be legal challenges, etc., and that would be all to the better. I believe such a program has a good chance of ultimately breaking the hoax.

    • Replies: @Wally
  262. Skeptikal says:
    @Bill Jones

    Dear Bill,

    Please check out the atmosphere (i.e., context) before cutting a fart.
    Thanks.

    • Replies: @Byrresheim
  263. For several days I have had the experience of my Comments not appearing on the thread until well after the time for editing them has expired, and in at least one case complete dropout. Have others had this experience or should I put on a tinfoil hat and exhibit a touch of paranoia?

  264. @Alden

    Still does not negate the fact that he had a lot of false positives. He accused a lot of people who were friends of communists for being communist. However many there were it is a fine line between attending one meeting or being a friend of a communist.
    Aside from the communism. He made it personal and abused his power. He pissed a lot of non communists off. Game,set,match. He deserved to go down. Suppose you were not a communist and you got called in. Your career ruined. Really

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
  265. @Alden

    Maybe your right!!! Have you ever heard of a computer or the internet?

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  266. fnn says:
    @Alden

    In 1936 37? He went to FDR with the evidence names, proof , results of his investigation and FDR outright refused to do anything about the communists in his state department. The communists had not come in through the civil service system but were all appointeded Roosevelt personally.

    I wasn’t sure if the year Berle went to Roosevelt with proof that so many of FDR’s personal appointees were communist so I looked on Berle’s wikepedia entry.

    9/2/1939:
    Adolf Berle’s Notes on his Meeting with Whittaker Chambers:
    https://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page100.html

    Berle met with FDR within the next two weeks:
    https://www.dcdave.com/article5/070113.htm

    When I called on Berle a couple of weeks later, he indicated to me that the President had given him the cold shoulder after hearing his account of the Chambers disclosures. Although I learned later, from two different sources who had social relations with Berle, that Roosevelt, in effect, had told him to “go jump in a lake” upon the suggestion of a probe into the Chambers charges, I do not recall hearing that exact phrase from Berle. To the best of my recollection, the President dismissed the matter rather brusquely with an expletive remark on this order: “Oh, forget it, Adolf.”

    • Replies: @Alden
  267. schrub says:

    [Clogging up a comment-thread by inserting a gigantic image-transcript without any MORE tag is exceptionally bad commenter behavior, and if repeated, might get most of your future comments trashed.]

    Probably the most convincing argument for Leo Frank’s guilt is contained in the closing statement made by Hugh Dorsey the government’s prosecutor in Frank’s case.

    Read it here. It is elegant, totally rational and utterly convincing.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  268. Rurik says:
    @geokat62

    Well Geo, I had to do some other tasks while I let the video play (it’s very long), but at about 40:50 in, you see four middle-aged, American, Christian white men, standing stalwart with the black Muslim feminist who dared to criticize AIPAC.

    Then the last half of the video has some gems there as well.

    Wow, Christian men calling out the ‘Synagogue of Satan’, for destroying America.

    My respect for Christians just swelled a margin. If they could muster the sand to create a strong movement, this could be something to get behind.

    For once the lyrics ‘Onward Christian Soldier’.. could mean something other than killing and dying for Israel.

  269. Rurik says:
    @Kratoklastes

    these whiney bitches hold some deep and abiding belief in truth or whatever-the-fuck… it’s all about the Benjamins, baby!

    butt-hurt much?

  270. Che Guava says:
    @David Baker

    I may have-shot my own foot with the reply to the Anon.

    So, to me, the lack of such reaction just demonstrates that it is only a drive-by poster.

    Srsly, except the few where I can work out former u-names, or where what they are saying would clearly be a danger to the self, (having used ‘anon’ twice or so in four years of participation for the latter reason) I despise posts here as ‘anon’.

    Since the site software handles ‘anon’ IDs as array elemenents or hash values in a linked list, ‘anon’ is no more anonymous than a pseudonym.

    I disagree with your post.

    I clearly recall seeing broadcast television programmes when overseas in the (very) late 1970s, until the mid-1980s,

    Young enough to have believed the lies re. skin lampshades and soap made with Jewish fat.

    I had come to suspect it was all a lie by the early 1980s.

    The brief period where western MSM sources (TV and newspapers) were occasionally telling the truth was the firing pin for the clamp-down.

    I also credit two songs by the Sex Pistols,
    Holidays in the Sun and Belsen was a Gas, as enlightening. John Lydon likes to disown the latter, and John Beverly (Sid Vicious) claimed to have written it in one show on their disastrous but spectacular U.S.A. tour.

    Given the sincere and strong energy with which Lydon was performing it live, and that Sid was a near-hopeless junky at the time, I don’t believe Lydon’s disclaimers.

    To me Lydon is now a hero with clay feet, he married the mother of his contemporary, ‘Ari up’,who is now dead.

    Sure, I still love much of the music, and don’t think that Lydon married a much older woman as a kind of mask (beard is the technical term), unlike the Micron of La France, who clearly married his drama teacher to further his career.

    … and to hide his homosexual life

  271. fnn says:
    @Fran Taubman

    McCarthy was urged to fire Cohn by his friends. The major biographers admit he would have saved himself form censure had he done so. It’s often theorized that McCarthy chose Cohn over the more level-headed RFK because he thought having Cohn in that position would help protect him from charges of anti-Semitism. And the background of RFK’s father probably helped him in that decision.

  272. Che Guava says:

    M. Ron Unz.,

    What it is the correct way to pronounce your surname?

    Excuse the question, it is sincere.

    • Agree: Liza
  273. Wow, fascinating article. Already changed my mind about a number of things.

    With regard to the recent round of book banning by amazon, and now looking back to the bellwether bannings of the holocaust revisionism books, all of this is correlated in time with the current fight over whether Amazon’s facility will be placed in Jew York or Jew Jersey. There are huge tax cut and financial incentives involved, and as I crudely allude, these two states more than any other are under great Jewish influence. Amazon seems clearly to be bowing to some sort of economic pressure. Perhaps after it’s all a “done deal,” amazon will return to its free speech platform. Wishful thinking.

    Well, we had amazon and its commitment to absolute free speech for over twenty years. Perhaps this has been an unprecedented interglacial in American public discourse. Like the author, my own worldview was transformed rapidly and profoundly by amazon and its reviews and book availability. We should be thankful for what we had, which has been bizarre and unprecedented in affairs. That it existed at all is the aberration, not that it’s going away, sadly.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  274. Amazon is not driven by morality. It sells other books that promote harmful quack remedies:

    https://www.wired.co.uk/article/amazon-autism-fake-cure-books

  275. Anon[399] • Disclaimer says:

    Someone should start a business called BANNED BOOKS. It doesn’t only have to sell books banned by Amazon. It can sell anything, but it will be a place where banned books can be found. Banned by any corporation or any nation

    In the 80s and 90s, certain Chinese movies were marketed as ‘Banned in China’, and that got people interested.

    If freedom-lovers play this right, the current censorship can be ‘judo-ed’ against the censors.

    There is the forbidden fruit factor in human nature. While capitalist oligarchs can suppress things, they can’t totally ban everything… like in Stalinist Russia or Mao’s China. Capitalism can be oppressive but also allows much freedom to pull the rug from the power.

    Take drugs and porn, two things that were either illegal or severely restricted. And yet, they spread and spread because people were to drawn to them. Even when pot was illegal, you could go to certain events and so many people were smoking that stuff.

    Now, something will not be appealing simply because it’s forbidden. If castor oil were forbidden and made illegal, I doubt if people will be buying it just for the ‘forbidden fruit’ factor. In contrast, pot and other drugs(even dreadful meth) give pleasure to people.

    If forbidden knowledge could be made pleasurable and addictive and then could be marketed as a ‘banned product’, it might take off. And learn from Bernays. The power of advertising. Associate banned knowledge with something ‘cool’ and ‘dashing’, like Mission Impossible 007 stuff.

  276. @Alden

    My knowledge of American communism is useless anyway. It hasn’t helped me or my fellow idiot Whites. I might as well have spent all those years watching Oprah

    I believe I know how you feel.

  277. Anon[399] • Disclaimer says:

    Now, CULTURE OF CRITIQUE is banned.

    If Amazon just banned a few titles, the idea of BANNED BOOKS business idea may not amount to much. But Amazon is now banning so much that it is becoming a viable business idea.

    AMAZON is turning into Blockbusters. Safe establishmentarian outfit. Capitalism as Stalinism.

    • Replies: @republic
  278. @Ron Unz

    I found this, since you find Wiki, so unreliable, but you can skew all of this they way that you want. It is interesting that one of your heroes Israel Shahak was a holocaust survivor, he and his family were in the Warsaw ghetto, and the camps. I know that I am nibbling around the edges, but allot of the UR is based on Holocaust denial, that it was a hoax or widely exaggerated.
    Doesn’t that hit you that these anti H folks, would call a Jew hater a liar? Just curious.
    Here is the article and a quote attributed to Toaff which makes sense to me.
    https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/35496

    Mr. Toaff said that he hopes eventually to recast the book, but he added that “my basic error was to think that a subject of this kind could be addressed in an antiseptic, scientific manner. Instead, it’s not possible because it’s linked to so many emotions, so many memories, and so many associations, including with recent events that have happened to our people.”

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @anon
  279. Meanwhile, today’s targets of social wrath are almost always just working-stiffs, powerless nobodies fearfully voicing their controversial online opinions under a pseudonym before having their identities “doxxed” and then sometimes getting fired from their merely hum-drum jobs.

    Uhh, which case (or cases) are being referred to here? Who got “doxxed” and then fired from their “hum-drum job”?

    • Replies: @Wally
  280. @fnn

    You are correct on all accounts, he made a mistake hiring Cohn, however I still think he would have been taken down, he falsely accused many people just look at the video of the last hearing, he often accused subordinates to get to leaders. He was very flawed, and he just got to people. And his logic was somewhat skewed.

  281. @fnn

    Here is the last transcript. What is it about “abuse of power” do people not understand. He started to accuse anyone that challenged him a communist.

    • Replies: @Wally
  282. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    “He started to accuse anyone that challenged him a communist.”

    He did? Where?

  283. Wally says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    I suggest the cases of Germar Rudolf, Wolgang Froehlich, Fred Leuchter, Ernst Zundel, David Irving, Ursula Haverbeck, Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, Robert Faurisson, Roger Garaudy, John Gudenus, Alain Guionnet, Gerd Honsik, Jean-Marie Le Pen, Laurent Louis, Norman Lowell, Roeland Raes, Dariusz Ratajczak, Simon Sheppard, Siegfried Verbeke, & Richard Williamson (bishop), for starters.

    All of them lost more than their jobs, but were fined and / or imprisoned for Thought Crimes and Free Speech violations.


    Ursula Haverbeck

    “It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.”
    – Robert Heinlein

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  284. @Ron Unz

    Ron,

    I thought to ask you (though I’m not holding my breath waiting for the answer…) what your current position is on the “Zebra Murders” attributed to the Nation of Islam back in the seventies?

    I mean, you seem to have discovered (perhaps to your surprise) that the Nation Of Islam actually has ongoing scholarly work of great quality to get at hidden historical truths. On the face of it, wouldn’t it be rather odd for this self-same institution in the Black community to have some program of giving people brownie points for murdering random white people?

    Do you still believe that?

    I only heard about the Zebra murders on this site a few years ago and immediately was very suspicious. For starters because (a) lack of any credible motive for them to do that and (b) it is likely impossible since any such organization is surely completely infiltrated with federal agent informants. (Even if, by some miracle they weren’t so infiltrated, they would have to assume they were!)

    So, have you revisited this? That Zebra murders thing was practically the centerpiece of this article on race relations in America.

  285. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    said:
    “It is interesting that one of your heroes Israel Shahak was a holocaust survivor, he and his family were in the Warsaw ghetto, and the camps. ”

    You are just another run-of-the-mill, uninformed Zionist, hasbarist.

    For starters, Shahak was in Bergen-Belsen where the scientifically impossible ‘Nazi gas chambers’ are not claimed to have existed. Him being one of countless fake “survivor$” is living testimony to the laughable absurdity of the Big Lie / “holocaust” , where it’s claimed ‘the Germans tried to kill every Jew the Germans could get their hands on’.

    We’re waiting for you to show us the millions of Jew remains that Jews like you claim exist in known locations.

    recommended:
    Jewish ‘Survivors’ of Auschwitz-Birkenau / not what we’re told, by John Wear, Inconvenient History, v. 10, n.2, 2018 : http://inconvenienthistory.com/10/2/5482

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  286. Expat tom says:
    @Rational

    Amazon. Kindly keep in mind that it is Amz who has put at least 900 “indie” bookshops out of biz. Amz also controls, owns for all practical purposes all of the used bookcenters on the net. As well as Book Depository, U.K., and is now in process of opening locations in Aus., Brisbane, and Sydney. There is no way in uknowhat that this lad will EVER spend one dime with that evil corp.

  287. Wally says:
    @Anon

    “The Jews’ stranglehold on the American mind starts with the holohoax.”

    You nailed it.
    That load of bogus, impossible, infantile crap is the foundation, the shield and sword for Jew unearned power.
    Without it, it’s game over
    http://www.codoh.com

  288. You must not be a student of this, but Welsh the lawyer for the Army had an assistant named Fisher, in response to Welsh requesting the list of suspected communist by sundown, McCarthy started to intimate that this Fisher guy who was on some legal club suspected of being communist only by rumor, was therefore a communist, It was so directly a slap to fisher for trying to fight back. Fisher is what he is referring to when he says “have you no decency”.
    This Fisher guy went on to be a big time lawyer and was eventually head of the bar association.

    • Replies: @fnn
  289. @jacques sheete

    I’ve got plenty of sources. The history that actually happened being the most significant. You are just trolling. Unless you have something to add to the conversation, you should just sit this one out. You rarely have anything relevant to say. I almost always ignore you. I’ll have no problem doing so in this case. Don’t waste your breath.

    [MORE]

     

     

     

    ‘The Secret War’ by Max Hastings

  290. Che Guava says:
    @Chaotic Neutral

    I read books and buy books. Stopping lately, too many to read. Also a library card, the combo will likely last until my last breath, although there are several English-language books I may like to read, sales relied on Amazon.

    Have never bought anything from Amazon, it was clearly an evil entity (as was ‘Google’, just a little earlier) from the start. I was making comments to that effect many years ago (surely over 15 years ago), not here, which didn’t exist at the time.

    That people are now startled ‘Oh, we were expecting Amazon to be a neutral book shop and are so sad there are no alternatives’, fools, that ‘Amazon’ was *always* predictable, from the start, even from the shite-name, what to expect from such a phenom?

    I will sure not buy a ‘kindle’. Never want,

  291. @Wally

    I suggest the cases of Germar Rudolf, Wolgang Froehlich, Fred Leuchter, Ernst Zundel, David Irving, Ursula Haverbeck, Gaston-Armand Amaudruz, Robert Faurisson, Roger Garaudy, John Gudenus, Alain Guionnet, Gerd Honsik, Jean-Marie Le Pen, Laurent Louis, Norman Lowell, Roeland Raes, Dariusz Ratajczak, Simon Sheppard, Siegfried Verbeke, & Richard Williamson (bishop), for starters.

    Wally, I was asking about the claim that people were “doxxed” and later lost their jobs as a result. I wasn’t aware of any such cases.

    None of the aforementioned people fit that description. None of these people were hiding their identity to start with, so obviously, they were never doxxed.

    • Replies: @utu
    , @Wally
  292. @Wally

    so how do you make that up, your past, when you loose your family and are in a DP camp.
    Are you suspended from reality. Back then no one wanted to fake that, it was humiliating. You are suspended from reality.
    Shahak was never accused of “faking is past”. That is an impossible thing do do after a war.
    All of you deniers are just fruit cakes. There were real people in those camps, and people new them.

    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @Wally
  293. @Fran Taubman

    “All of you deniers are just fruitcakes”. It would seem that you believers should be described in that manner, because you’re validating War Atrocity Propaganda and Camp Rumors. In a court of law, your witnesses were revealed as charlatans, who’ve capitalized on those rumors, but were forced to confess their stories were fabrications during their cross examinations.. Mr. Wiesel was in the process of being exposed as an impostor by a concentration camp survivor, who actually knew the man tattooed with the number Wiesel claimed was his. It may surprise you that, once these ‘witness’ testimonies were debunked during the Zundel False News Trial in Canada, none of them would appear at Zundel’s appeal trial. Frankly, you have vindicated my observation about a polemical orthodoxy of Holocaust so-called “Exterminationists”: You’re projecting a rather pathetic, sanctimonious defense of War Atrocity Propaganda being presented as fact.

  294. Cowboy: “The Gilet Jaune, MAGA, Brexit and events in Italy, Hungary and Poland illustrate that the “vast majority” do not agree. What we have had for decades is manufactured consent. This is the result of intimidation, not tolerance and certainly not approval.”

    What bullshit!

    You seem unacquainted with how things are decided in representative democracies, and in the culture at large. Just because some people have misgivings, you say vast majority don’t agree. If they didn’t agree, they wouldn’t go along with it. That should be self-evident. But they do go along with it. Then you claim that going along with it is the result of “intimidation”. But societies always incentivize certain things, and disincentivize others. What is the law but intimidation by the power of the state? People ordinarily don’t break the law because they make a rational choice that crime doesn’t pay. Culture itself is based on the intimidating power of conformity to norms. Defy the culture, and you will face ostracism and persecution. It’s always been that way.

    If you don’t think the public is tolerating Bezos’ actions, then where’s the outrage? Where are the demonstrations? Where are the riots? Where are serious legislative proposals to restrain Amazon, Facebook, etc. from censorship? Nowhere, that’s where. The problem with your “intimidation” theory is that it’s unfalsifiable. Any cultural norm will have both enthusiastic adherents and people that only go along with it grudgingly. But the fact that these latter DO go along with it shows, in the only way that’s important, that they approve of it.

    • Replies: @fnn
  295. @David Baker

    Stick with that it will get you far.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  296. @republic

    Churches, mosques, and temples, yes.

  297. fnn says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Fisher belonged to the National Lawyer’s Guild, a known Communist front, but had left about five years before the hearings. Today, the NLG still exists and acts as a legal support group for Antifa.

  298. utu says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Michael Brutsch, the Texas man behind the notorious Reddit troll Violentacrez, was fired this weekend, one day after Gawker outed him in an article Friday.
    https://gawker.com/5951987/reddits-biggest-troll-fired-from-his-real-world-job-reddit-continues-to-censor-gawker-articles

    How ‘Doxxing’ Became a Mainstream Tool in the Culture Wars
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/30/technology/doxxing-protests.html

    ‘Doxxing’ someone, even if he’s a Nazi sympathizer, poses a serious ethical dilemma
    https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/08/doxxing-someone-even-if-hes-a-nazi-sympathizer-poses-a-serious-ethical-dilemma.html

    The Ethics Of Doxing Nazis
    https://theestablishment.co/the-ethics-of-doxing-nazis-8e3d400d4619/

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  299. Art says:

    Clearly America is in German 1920 Weimar territory. Our culture is not ours. Just like 1920’s Germany – Jews dominated the intellectual part of the culture. Jew monetary demands dominated government. The average German was not making it – prospects were dim. Morals were loose.

    Will America face a new kind of dictatorship – a Green Dictatorship? Will every human action be prescribed by environment concerns? Will the Greens take over economic production like the Nazis did? That is what they want.

    Could AOC become the new Führer? Looks like she is just getting started.

    Hmm?

    Do No Harm — Art

  300. @Fran Taubman

    Have you ever heard of spelling?

    Also, I enjoy the fact that your name includes the German word for DEAF (“taub”).

  301. Patricus says:
    @jfk

    Thanks jfk for the link to Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together (comment #14).

    I searched for the book several months ago. Amazon had a redacted version. Ten of twenty five chapters were left out. I was able to find a free pdf complete version after about 30 minutes searching. A few days ago I told this to a friend who didn’t believe me. We visited the amazon site together. This time there was no English version, redacted or otherwise, but there was a Russian language version. Unfortuately neither of us speak or read Russian.

  302. @Fran Taubman

    So, there WERE Lampshades made from Jewish Skin? The Germans were making SHRUNKEN HEADS?! Oh, and your Human Soap was a staple resource for camp occupant hygiene? You sure have high standards for describing what is “Bullshit”, don’t you?

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  303. Unz video posted an AlJazeera report on China censoring its internet.

    Seems a Chinese feminist and admirer of the ?MeToo movement was shut down, and she’s annoyed.

    Fascinating that the one western analyst in the clip, Mark Natkin, is most likely a member-by-origin of the same tribe that seeks to censor Facebook, censors Germany to the point of imprisoning for thought crimes, influences Amazon to censor books of which Natkin’s co-tribalists do not approve.

    It would have been useful to have an countering Chinese voice and explanation of why the Chinese wanted to exercise control over their culture.
    Maybe 200-year old upstart Westerners can learn a thing or two from the Chinese.

    This discussion of philosophical differences between Chinese and Americans in choosing political leaders appeared on SicSemperTyrannis recently:

    https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2019/03/bad-blood-secrets-and-lies-in-a-silicon-valley-startup-by-john-carreyrou-observations-by-walrus-.html#comment-4373079848

    [T]hey [Chinese] find our amateur, promise-driven, personality-based governance repulsive. They would no more vote for amateur politicians than for amateur brain surgeons. To them charm, good looks, quick wits and rhetorical skill signify shallowness, instability and glibness. Altruistic politicians have been fundamental to Chinese governance for two millennia.

    Their political stars have always been experienced, scholarly, altruistic problem-solvers chosen on merit after decades of testing.

    In 1000 AD, during our Dark Ages, with just one scholar-official for every eight thousand citizens, China was harmonious, technologically advanced and prosperous. Emperors and dynasties came and went while loyal, disciplined–often courageous–civil servants lived far from family, serving in remote regions under terrible conditions.

    Confucius'[2] moral meritocracy and the rigors of the job discouraged sociopaths and officials integrity, efficiency and entrepreneurial energy made China the most advanced civilization on earth.

  304. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    In the end, it’s not about left vs right. The Right isn’t good on free speech either. GOP voted for anti-BDS legislation which is crazy.

    It all comes down to Thumbs Up or Down by Zionists.

    Amazon might as well be called Ama-Zion.

  305. @Fran Taubman

    …he had a lot of false positives.

    Really?

  306. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Laughable strawmen from you everywhere. You’re in over your head and are now panicking.

    Make what up? Shahak was in Bergen-Belsen as I said, so what?
    No one said Shahak lied about being in Bergen-Belsen.
    No one said Jews were not sent to camps, like Japanese-Americans were, like Christians & anti-communists were in Soviet gulags.

    Where’s the proof that anyone lost their family because of scientifically impossible & laughable ‘gas chambers’? You have none or you would present it.

    Where are your alleged human remains of millions of Jews in allegedly known locations to see? After all, it’s your Jews who make those claims, not me.

    The claimed ‘6M Jews & 5M others’ is one helluva a lot of human remains to just disappear. That alleged 11M equals the population of London.

    It’s you who is in denial of laws of science and are now clinging to a primitive religion that is very profitable and beneficial to Jews and “that shitty little country”.

    The “Holocau$t Industry” in court:
    ‘Please your honor, there really are remains of millions upon millions buried in huge mass graves, we know where the mass graves are, but, but, well, umm, we can’t show the court the human remains. You must trust us, we’re Zionists.’

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @David Baker
  307. @Fran Taubman

    Warning: DO NOT, repeat DO NOT READ this Review if there are sharp objects, bats, children, or persons with hearing aids in the room: You will want to scream, throw something, or say things unfit for innocent ears.

    I read this far before the glass in the windows started to rattle:

    The Nazis diligently covered their tracks and made sure no photographs were taken of prisoners being gassed inside chambers that they later destroyed — and which Mr. Irving insists never existed. In a smugly disingenuous bit of showmanship, he challenges the defense to find holes in the collapsed roof of the gas chambers at Auschwitz through which cyanide pellets were pumped.

    dearie me to gawd.
    Even for New York Times, this is detached from reality.

    But — Aren’t we informed that the Allies got there first, and they had Hollywood camera crews with them, and they took pictures — they got shots of the lampshades and shrunken heads, and they were able to create enough verisimilitude to cause people like Patton to near-puke. But no photos of “prisoners being gassed inside the chambers?”

    And who would have taken those pictures anyway, and at what point in the gassing process: does the NYTimes writer require watching the people — ‘scuse me, Jews — being shoved into the gas chamber, or the chamber packed full of soon-to-be-deaded Jews, or of the pellets dropping, or of Jewish bodies slowly — or quickly, which is it? — turning blue? (um, ZyklonB causes the human body to turn red.) Or should the Germans have taken photos of the aftermath of pellet-dropping, just before bodies taken out? Wouldn’t the chamber have been toxic, at that point?
    So many questions that the NYTimes writer failed to pursue.

    Another line of questions: Isn’t it true that in a circumstance unique in all of history, Allies removed from Germany tons of documents from German official files, archives, secret stashes — the works. Jewish agents were among the most active in acquiring these documents; Jewish prosecutors used the documents in Nuremberg trials; Jewish historians were the first to comb through the tons of documents in storage in Alexandria, VA, before microfilming them, returning originals to Germany and sending copies to “the German archive,” where a Jewish person oversaw their control and access to them, for over 50 years.
    You mean to tell me in all of those tons of files of incriminating evidence against the Germans, not one single teensy-weensy photo of a Zykon-B blue Jewish corpse fresh from the gas chamber could be found? Or even faked?
    Pshaw.
    Somewhere, a Hollywood props curator is sleeping on the job.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
    , @Alden
  308. Skeptikal says:
    @Grahamsno(G64)

    But not paper.
    So, you couldn’t really read yourself to sleep with a codex . . .

  309. Wally says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Oh please, spare me the spin.

    So giving worse examples makes their cases OK by your standards.

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  310. @utu

    Michael Brutsch, the Texas man behind the notorious Reddit troll Violentacrez, was fired this weekend, one day after Gawker outed him in an article Friday.

    Not a great example if the article you linked is accurate.

    This is not surprising, as Brutsch had built his online reputation on distributing pictures of underaged girls in bikinis and being offensive as possible.

    I mean, the whole thing leaves me wondering whether he was fired for genuine dissident political speech or more just for pure assholery.

    I mean, how many known cases are there of people getting doxxed on an Internet forum and then fired on account of what really is a genuine free speech issue? At first blush, the Michael Brutsch case looks like a dubious example.

    Of course, even if one counted Michael Brutsch for the sake of argument, one case, or even two or three in the last decade — I kinda doubt that it’s a very widespread problem.

  311. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    We notice that you don’t say what is in the Hollywoood movie that you claim refutes “holocaust” Revisionism. Because you dare not debate specifics.

    Here’s real analysis of your ludicrous and lie filled Hollywood fantasy movie ‘Denial’.
    Caution: You will see real forensics & science applied.

    DenialTheFilm.com – Revisionist rebuttal of upcoming Lipstadt movie defaming Revisionists: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10675&p=80126&hilit=denial+weisz#p80126
    Denial, “A Battle to Defend the Veracity of Historical Facts”: https://codoh.com/library/document/4101/?lang=en
    The Anti-Revisionist Hollywood Movie Attacking Historian David Irving Is a Flop: https://codoh.com/library/document/4180/?lang=en
    Denial’ movie debut a big flop !! / schadenfreude deluxe: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10727
    much more:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=denial+weisz

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  312. @Wally

    Bergen Belsen was where Anne Frank succumbed to typhus. Her father suffered from the disease, and was treated at the Auschwitz Infirmary. As the Red Army approached, Auschwitz would be hastily abandoned, and the inmates were given the option of being liberated by the Russians, or embark upon the difficult journey to relocate to camps within Germany. Many thousands of camp inmates perished when the German Transportation Infrastructure was decimated by allied bombings and tactical strikes. Food, medicines and other supplies could not reach the camps.

    Those deaths were recorded.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  313. @niteranger

    Jeff Bezos welcomes you to the age of virtual book burnings.

  314. I wish I could make sense of the moderation policies on Unz.com. I’m not sure how site moderating is any different than censorship.

  315. @Wally

    During the Nuremberg Tribunal, a device was described which was capable of “eradicating’ 20,000 Jews without leaving a trace. Perhaps that explains where those remains wound up……..

    • Replies: @Wally
  316. @Grace Poole

    There were survivors who were the sole survivor of their families, meaning their mothers and fathers and sisters and brothers were no longer their in the camp with them, who arrived with them. Are you so strung out that you cannot understand that families, there are documents and testimony from people who lived along the railway lines, people were transported to these camps, and never came out. How do you fake something like that, send the missing people to another planet?
    There was also before the gas chambers, small gassing trucks in polish towns, where people were witnesses to these gassings, that is why they stopped them. They would have the rabbi call everyone to the town center and well. There is documents of and witness to mass grave shootings.
    But I do not need to go on my question to you is in your Hollywood fantasy land WHERE DID ALL THE PEOPLE GO WHO ARRVED THERE AND NEVER CAME OUT.

    Imagine Grace you and your family were transported to a camp after lets say a ghetto liquidation which was witnessed and documented, and you went there with your parents and 3 brothers, at the end of a couple of years there was only YOU. Forget gassing what happened to those people?
    I am told it is stupid to even try and talk to hard core deniers, but what happened to those people?

  317. @Wally

    I am not lookin at your real forensic bullshit I know people who survived those camps, they know what they saw.

    • Replies: @Wally
  318. “They know what they saw”. Two of the most prominent Jewish eyewitnesses in the world “knew what they saw”, until they were subjected to cross examination in a court of law. Suddenly, they were forced to admit they didn’t see what they had claimed. In fact, they merely repeated the rumors that were circulating throughout the camps, and simply embellished the rest until they were exposed. The ICRC was tasked with investigating these rumors, and they didn’t see any evidence of gassing, or other activities attributed to German Camp staff members. Wiesel said he saw Jews being thrown alive into flaming trenches (Jewish babies were furnished with their own pyres…) Somehow, he didn’t notice the gassing of Jews during his tenure at Auschwitz, because he didn’t mention gas chambers in his book “Night”. Raul Hilberg claimed he saw Orders from Hitler to Exterminate the Jews. In the same court, he could produce those orders when he was asked to do so. In fact, he deleted references to those orders in the revised edition of his book “The Destruction of the European Jews”. Have you seen those orders?

  319. Anon[206] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    “WHERE DID ALL THE PEOPLE GO WHO ARRVED THERE AND NEVER CAME OUT.”

    That is a disingenuous question as none of us, including yourself, know the answer, and it implies that no one knows the answer. But that is false. The International Tracing Service has all the records*, a large staff (I’ve read 500 people), and have been researching the subject for 70 years. They know, but they will not tell you the answer. It is worth noting that the Red Cross/ITS did in less circumspect times estimate the total number of deaths in the camps and arrived at a figure of about 300,000 for all the camps for which they had data. Here is the smmary –

    [MORE]

    *The Nazis kept meticulous detailed records including doctor signed death certificates for every prisoner that died in the camps. The Soviets captured the Auschwitz records and hid them. Following glasnost the records were revealed to the world. The stone plaque at the gate to Auschwitz stating that 4 million had been murdered there was removed. The records captured by the Brits/US are still effectively hidden from all the approved ‘authorities’ in Bad Arolsen Germany. You can now check out the Auschwitz records from the NY public library –

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  320. Not to appear disingenuous, but you DO know there was a W-A-R in Europe during World W-A-R II? During wars, people are killed. Jews, Italians, French, American, German, Polish, Russian and Japanese soldiers, civilians and spies were slaughtered. That’s what happens during wars. Though Jews claimed they were singled out by the Third Reich for ‘extermination’, there is no evidence that Hitler wanted the Jews exterminated. He wanted them OUT of Germany, and he was working with Zionists to facilitate the emigration of Jews to Palestine, but he did not kill 6,000,000 Jews, nor did he operate “Death Camps” with Gas Chambers, Steam Chambers, Electrocution Floors, Head Bashing Machines or other mass killing devices.

  321. Here’s something that mentions big corporations as well as governments in the FT

    The web has fallen under the influence of a bad crowd – https://www.ft.com/content/333501f2-43d4-11e9-a965-23d669740bfb?shareType=nongift via @FT

    and this may be of interest too

    https://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/janet-albrechtsen/when-it-comes-to-free-speech-we-either-fight-back-of-shut-up/news-story/366df86b910f919627f4221601511829

  322. @Anon

    You really crack me up. seriously you can not make this shit up, so our families are just lying fools.

    EYE WITNESS
    EYE WITNESS
    EYE WITNESS
    EYE WITNESS

    Take those books a shove them

  323. Biff says:
    @Fran Taubman

    WHERE DID ALL THE PEOPLE GO WHO ARRVED THERE AND NEVER CAME OUT.

    Maybe they went to a wedding party?

    http://www.unz.com/article/school-shooters-and-drones/

  324. Wally says: • Website
    @Fran Taubman

    Stop being a dumb Zionist for a moment and deal with these:
    I challenge you to name just three “survivors”, tell us in their own words what they said, where they were, when.
    – There are vastly more “survivors & witnesses” to witchcraft & sorcery than the impossible ‘gas chambers’ and impossbly absurd “holocaust” claims.
    Please name your so called “witnesses” and what they supposedly witnessed.
    – Tell us what court your so called “witnesses” testified in? Let’s see their verbatim text with cross examination.
    Tell us how the impossible gas chambers supposedly worked
    .
    – laughable ‘gas vans’: Why fake them if they were real? Read below.
    Gas Van Film and Photo Fraud / German News Magazine and Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Museum Caught Faking Photo and Film Captions: http://codoh.com/library/document/3276
    and:
    Scholar Graf debunks the laughable ‘gas vans’: https://forum.codoh.comviewtopic.php?f=2&t=8251
    – said: “There is documents of and witness to mass grave shootings.” OK, then show us and learn.
    Show us the contents of the alleged 2M Jews supposedly shot into mass graves where the locations of the alleged ‘mass graves’ are said to be precisely known.

    Jews went where Jews are. You cannot prove they are missing. Jews poured out of Europe into Palestine for example.
    And if Jews are so sure that millions of Jews were murdered, then why do they ask such dumb questions like “what happened to them then? LOL
    After all, Jews say ’6M Jews & 5M others’ went to huge mass graves, Jews claim to know the exact locations of these alleged enormous mass graves to this day, yet Jews cannot show us what they claim exists.
    see:
    ‘J. Graf and the illogical canard: ‘Where did Jews go then?’ / & more’
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8272
    WJC’s Stephen Wise said 1,250,000 – 1,500,000 Polish Jews homeless in Europe, outside of Poland, & alive after WWII: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10191
    Jews evacuated to USSR during war: https://archive.is/jA9iI
    more Jews evacuated to USSR during war: https://www.jta.org/1944/02/23/archive/german-lauds-russia-for-joining-intergovernmental-committee-for-refugees

  325. Wally says:
    @David Baker

    At Nuremberg it was indeed accepted that Germans used atomic bombs on Jews.

    ‘Nazis killed Jews with magic atomic bomb…’
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1150

    [MORE]

    ‘Germans killed 20,000 Jews with atomic bomb’ LOL

    http://www.codoh.com

  326. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    You’re becoming completely unglued.

    You also dodged what I posted about your laughable “eyewitnesses / survivors”.
    try again:
    Jewish ‘Survivors’ of Auschwitz-Birkenau / not what we’re told, by John Wear, Inconvenient History, v. 10, n.2, 2018 : http://inconvenienthistory.com/10/2/5482

    Debate us here, we challenge you:
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

    http://www.codoh.com

  327. @Fran Taubman

    “..so our families are just lying fools”. If they claim they saw Jews being gassed, then yes. Two EYE WITNESS testimonies were impugned under oath in court. Your families should have been notified and flown to Toronto to offer their testimony–if not during the first trial debacle, then during the appeal trial. NONE of the Holocaust EYE WITNESSES appeared to testify about their experiences during the appeal trial. The only expert the prosecution could muster was a man named Browning, who was so thoroughly trounced by Zundel’s defense team, he shrank two sizes during his brutal cross examination.

  328. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Yeah boy, even more people have claimed to see witches, sorcerers, angels, the devil.

    Yes, I realize you don’t want to be confused by the facts. But then you are a Zionist.

    Your fake & impossible “holocaust” religion is disintegrating, get used to it.

    And heeeerrres is Fran:

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  329. @Ron Unz

    This is unrelated but this form is the only reliable way I can contact you. I think its possable Timothy Tyson realesed this stuff he did on Emitt Till when he did because of the traction your KKK article had. I remember reading about this only days after I read your article. Now maybe it is just a coecidenec but you know what? Carolyn Bryant is still alive and I think you should go and interview her. Time is very limited. I can help you if you want(providing armed protection and what not). Please consider.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till#Admission_that_the_testimony_against_Till_was_false

  330. @Fran Taubman

    Take those books a shove them

    I am not lookin at your real forensic bullshit

    Yes Holotard who needs any stinking evidence for mass murder. So what if there is absolutely no trace of Zyklon B in Kremas 2 & 3 where half a million were allegedly gassed, so what if the doors of these gas chambers where up to two thousand were gassed at a time were made of wood, so what if no holes for the introduction of Zyklon B were found in the ruins of Kremas 2 & 3, so what if the coke supplies to Auschwitz were totally insufficient for cremating a million, so what if the ventilation plans for the gas chambers were upside down with fresh air coming from the top and stale air departing from the bottom ( totally retarded given that Zyklon B is lighter than air), so what if the crematorium capacity was totally insufficient for cremating a million, so what if the Bletchley park intercepts of Auschwitz reveal nothing sinister, we just have to believe right?

    Which witness should we believe? Jews being roller coasted into blast furnaces? SS bicycling victims into gas chambers? The underground swimming pool in Belzec where they were electrocuted? The geysers of blood? The pedal powered brain bashing machines? The masturbation machines or my favourite one SS intervening in the middle of a gassing to pull out a Jewess?

    You’re a believer in a phony pseudo-religious cult. You can never debate us which’s why you throw us into prisons when you can. For all i care you should be paying reparations to Germany.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  331. AnonyMous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    so our families are just lying fools.

    Yes.

  332. @Fran Taubman

    What you need to take on board, Fran, as you ruminate and fulminate over the holocaust porn you learned at your mother’s knee and your Jewish day school and your Hebrew school and that has such a firm grasp on the way you perceive the world and function in it is that a few Big Jews made the decisions on which masses of Little Jews were to die.

    Zionist leaders made sure the rich and smart Jews were safely out of harm’s way before Mossad el-aliyeh bet— false flags set off hostilities.

    Jews surrounding FDR and Churchill — and Hitler — wanted the war and started it on their timetable. Do you think THEY were so “idiotic” or “stupid” as to not realize that many Jews — like those Jews who simply could not be successful at Biro Bijan — would die?

    Herzl tried to convince Kaiser Wilhelm to grant Jews an “Exodus.”
    You know more about Exodus than I do, I’m not Jewish.
    Within the Exodus story, Yahweh tells Moses that Jews who are not fit to enter the Promised Land must die. Moses instructs the Levites to kill Jews.

    Jews killed Jews.

    You want to know where all those dead family members are?
    Ask your Jewish leaders.

  333. @Fran Taubman

    WHERE DID ALL THE PEOPLE GO WHO ARRVED THERE AND NEVER CAME OUT.

    Forget gassing what happened to those people?

    Ask your Jewish leaders.

    When they set the war in motion in 1933, surely they knew that many Jews would die: they started pre-printing death lists for surplus Jews before the turn of the century.

    Big Jews — the ultra-zionists — wanted war and pulled the levers that started the war.

    They also knew which Jews were needed in Palestine and which Jews would migrate to USA to take over that nation. They got out first — did you notice that? Did your Hebrew teachers point that out to you?

    Zionist leaders made studies of the “holding capacity” of Palestine; they knew how many Jews and what type of Jews the zionist project in Palestine could accommodate; Jews like those who could not succeed at Biro Bijan were equally unfit for the kind of pioneering struggle creating Israel would require; their death certificates were written in Yiddish and Hebrew, not German. Jewish leaders knew which Jews were so degenerated that they could never measure up to the standards set by the eugenicists at the head of the zionist project.

    Do you think that the Big Jews who set the war in motion — after first ensuring that rich and educated and skilled Jews got out of Europe — were so idiotic that they did not know that hundreds of thousands of Little Jews would die? (Hold that thought.)

    Ask Rabbi Stephen Wise’s grandchildren — they’re still alive in the midwest USA: ask them what happened to Jews who did not survive a war their grandfather / great grandfather worked so hard to start.

    Nobody that I have ever met in my long life among Catholics could ever conceive of making the statement that Madeleine Albright made: that the deaths of 500,000 innocent children was “worth the price.”

    The zionists who were so ideologically driven that creating Israel trumped all other considerations — for them, the deaths of however many surplus Jews it took was “worth the price.” They had to have known from the moment they started beating war drums — within weeks of Hitler rising to chancellorship — which Jews would live and which Jews would die.

    My people don’t think in those terms.

    Jews do.

    You just displayed for us how a hard core zionist thinks.

    I think you are the scum of the earth.

  334. Cowboy says:

    This recent Ron Unz Article discussed the absurd over representation of jews in the Ivy League universities:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/

    In the comments, many people identified how jews cheat on tests. Kaplan was a theme, IIRC.

    Today ZeroHedge brings this out:

    Meet The Man Behind The “Largest College Admissions Scam Ever”

    The man at the center of the scheme is 58-year-old William Rick (((Singer))). A jew, whodathunk. Up to 7 dollars million to get a rich jew boy into university. He also had these jews lie on their applications about things like disabilities. WTF! A jew lying about disabilities? Oy Vey.

    But it gets even better, he was also rigging the SAT and other tests, just like Kaplan.

    Jews aren’t smarter, they just enjoy lying, cheating and murdering.

    • Replies: @Art
    , @Ralph B. Seymour
  335. fnn says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Culture itself is based on the intimidating power of conformity to norms. Defy the culture, and you will face ostracism and persecution. It’s always been that way.

    Yeah, like the beatniks and the hippies were so relentlessly persecuted. Actually not so much. Even the blacklisted Communists quietly returned to mainstream society after the Red Scare petered out in the early 1960s. Even before that, many worked through pseudonyms or relocated to Europe or Mexico.

  336. @Grace Poole

    Well right back at you with the scum part, and so glad we scummy zionist have nukes.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  337. @Grace Poole

    What we Zionist should do Grace is get some fake Zycon B and create fake photos of Jews gassing Arab children, and then prove that it was staged and fake.
    Then you could spend the rest of your life trying to prove that the Jews gassed Arab children, because only the Jews are capable of that. Better than trying to prove the real gassing by the germans was fake.
    It will be a better use of your time. Don’t you think?
    Accusing the Zionist of gassing, rater then defending the Germans, much easier to accuse then defend.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  338. @Wally

    That photo is actually a photo of me performing a satanic ritual. When I come up from the sand I spit out lizards, then I spit out dead children, then the finally I rise up and spit Goyim male penises.
    Yeah Baby.

    • Replies: @Wally
  339. @Wally

    Hey, Wally, you moron. Don’t you even read the comments you’re replying to before emitting canned response #17 or whatever?

    In comment #283, I was specifically asking about the people (so it is claimed) who were “doxxed” and then fired as a result.

    None of the examples you gave were of that. All of the people, like Faurisson etc. were not anonymous in the first place. So they weren’t doxxed. What you replied has absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote!

    • Replies: @Wally
  340. @Alden

    Particularly disgusting to watch are the two segments aired on 60 Minutes where they twist and turn every fact of the Rosenbergs’ trial to make the case that they were somehow martyrs and that they are owed an apology for their execution.

    Sociopathy in the guise of religion. And it rules over us to our doom.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Alden
  341. @Grahamsno(G64)

    That’s why they (Jews) are convincing government/U.N. shabbos goy politicians to enact laws forbidding any public doubt being expressed about the Holocaust, with revisionist historians and forensic experts being imprisoned after discussing and/or publishing their findings. When you need a law to protect your fairy tale, people should raise both eyebrows on this topic.

  342. Wally says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    So IOW, little busted hasbarist, you dodged my point and just keep on spinning.

    But then that’s how your sort works.

    Oh yes, your mentioned comment #17 is not even by me. LOL

    Cheers.

  343. @Fran Taubman

    Zyklon B was used in Concentration Camps to delouse clothing, bedding, buildings and train cars to prevent the spread of disease. There was an epidemic of typhus occurring in Europe during World War II, and this product was an effective means of killing lice and vermin, which are carriers of viruses. Zyklon B is still in use today.

  344. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    You certainly took a beating here.
    No wonder you dodge the information which shreds your impossible “holocaust”.
    FYI:
    Righteous Jew Revisionists: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6912

  345. @Grace Poole

    Old Adolf never knew how much of a patsy he was for Zionists, who maneuvered him and his Third Reich into power. He not only destroyed a beautiful and prospering nation with a pointless war, he placed his decimated population on the hook for funding Jews with “Reparations. ” You can see why Time Magazine named Der Fuhrer “Man of the Year”, he was a key figure in the establishment of Israel.

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
  346. anon[302] • Disclaimer says:
    @obwandiyag

    thx, you’re always good for a laugh

  347. @Fran Taubman

    Do your “Sole Survivors” have a violinist following them around to accompany their oratories? Why do people like you ignore the Jewish Declaration of War against Germany, along with their Worldwide Boycott of German goods orchestrated to cripple the struggling German economy? When you Declare War on people, don’t expect Tea and Crumpets being offered by the recipients of your declaration.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  348. anon[302] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    say the holohoax actually happened – why should i care?

    The Ukrainians and Armenians don’t push their tragedies on me all day

    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @Wally
  349. anon[302] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    Particularly disgusting to watch are the two segments aired on 60 Minutes where they twist and turn every fact of the Rosenbergs’ trial to make the case that they were somehow martyrs and that they are owed an apology for their execution.

    this is the thing, just like in the Leo Frank case, jews are seemingly unable to admit they are wrong, that one of theirs has harmed someone else even when the evidence is overwhelming

  350. anonymous[396] • Disclaimer says:
    @schrub

    spoiler it please

  351. anonymous[396] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    ‘Stick with that it will get you far.’

    I will translate from yiddish:

    Uncle!

    Uncle!

  352. republic says:
    @Anon

    Separation and its discontents also banned by Amazon today

    see: occidental observer for comments by Kevin MacDonald

  353. Art says:
    @Cowboy

    Jews aren’t smarter, they just enjoy lying, cheating and murdering.

    The difference between most everyone and Jews, is that a Jew is willing to go one lower then the next guy for dollar. Jews are bottom feeders. It is not a canard, money is paramount to a Jew.

    Think Peace — Art

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  354. @anon

    Jews were treated terribly by the Third Reich. Hitler wanted those people out of Germany, and he took steps to encourage their emigrating to Palestine. There were Jews who returned from that country, after they discovered the lack of opportunities for business and personal security Those Jews were rounded up and paced in Concentration Camps as forced laborers. This was the heartless campaign by Hitler to “Purify” his nation of people he considered undesirable. Hitler did NOT endeavor to exterminate the Jews, though, and no evidence of this effort has been presented. The images we’re shown are the result of the collapse of Germany in the waning months of the war.

  355. @Fran Taubman

    I think you will find that taking the low road, as you have in your post, will undermine your already very weak position. In fact, if I was invested in the myth of the holocaust for whatever reason, I would remain silent.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  356. @David Baker

    I think that is absolutely correct.

  357. Wally says:
    @anon

    Except there seems to be no proof for the ‘Armenian genocide’, and from what I’ve seen, very little for the ‘holodomor’.

    However, I’m willing to change those views if shown proof.

    Thanks.

  358. @Grace Poole

    Israel executes Palestinians outright. What does Fran Taubman have to say about this?

  359. @David Baker

    There were survivors, whose were the only members of their family left. Unless you take Grace Pools
    suggestion that Jews killed the other Jews, their own family.
    Nothing like real people who survived.

  360. @David Baker

    I have a human lampshade of a distant relative. Want to see it?

    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @Colin Wright
  361. @David Baker

    You can see why Time Magazine named Der Fuhrer “Man of the Year”, he was a key figure in the establishment of Israel.

    That never occurred to me. Dang. A precursor of Saddam Hussein: first you work for us, then we kill you and your nation.

    Was Time a Luce magazine in that era?
    Benjamin Ginsberg wrote, “How the Jews Defeated Hitler.” iirc the Luces are listed among those that American zionists collaborated with/ colluded with to produce propaganda before and during the war.

  362. @Fran Taubman

    No. Why don’t you produce those Hitler Orders? Hilberg couldn’t find them during his testimony. Maybe German used them to wrap the lampshades for shipping.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  363. fnn: “Yeah, like the beatniks and the hippies were so relentlessly persecuted. ”

    They were ostracized. The long hair and beard meant many jobs were closed to you. And of course, the more radical your hippie ideology, the greater the persecution. Draft dodgers, for example, often went to jail or fled to Canada.

    fnn: “Even the blacklisted Communists quietly returned to mainstream society after the Red Scare petered out in the early 1960s. Even before that, many worked through pseudonyms or relocated to Europe or Mexico.”

    Apparently you don’t understand that the fact that they had to work through pseudonyms or flee to another country undermines your point. As I said, non-conformity is persecuted.

    • Replies: @fnn
  364. @David Baker

    Yo a hole, I am a German Jew from a German Jewish family. My mother’s side completely wiped out. Why don’t you find out what happened to them?
    I am so glad we have nukes to deal with people like you, who may get too close. I do not need to find orders or documents or find lists, I have birth certificates and the last known address which was a concentration camp and no bodies any ware to be found, I cannot believe I would ever see this in my lifetime. Where Grace tells me that should ask the living Jews why they killed the missing Jews.
    Yes those people are missing family members, the living were in DP camps after the war.
    Most went to Israel, the rest came here.
    I don’t know Baker where would you logically think they are?

    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @ANON
  365. @Ralph B. Seymour

    I am a German Jew with a German Jewish family who perished in the Holocaust,
    AND I HAVE A WEAK POSITION!!!
    What position do you have?

  366. @Fran Taubman

    ‘I have a human lampshade of a distant relative. Want to see it?’

    Now we know you are at best misinformed and at worst dishonest. The lampshades made of human skin were an invention.

  367. @Fran Taubman

    “Why don’t you find out what happened to them?” I know they weren’t gassed. They were not killed due to any German Program to exterminate Jews. Why don’t you inform the folks here what DID happen to your family? Or do you actually know?

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  368. @Fran Taubman

    You really crack me up. seriously you can not make this shit up, so our families are just lying fools.

    That’s not really the issue. Probably, if you familiarized with the revisionist position on what happened (I have to assume you haven’t) you would end up seeing that the oral history from your family is at least as consistent with the revisionist position as the conventional view.

    In any case, it is really ludicrous to be arguing that stories in your family substantiate things like a death total of 6 million people (or something on that order.) Your family members could have witnessed some atrocities, but would have no idea how many people were killed in total.

  369. Cowboy says:
    @Art

    “money is paramount to a Jew”

    When (((Leona Helmsley))) said “Taxes are for little people”, what she meant was “Taxes are for goyim”. We will see how many jews get sent to jail for their blatant tax evasion.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-13/parents-college-admission-scandal-may-face-tax-fraud-charges-and-irs-penalties

    “If the IRS then finds out they took deductions on fake charitable contributions, parents could be hit with “large penalties” under “tax code Section 6601 and Section 6662, which cover interest payments and penalties for underpayment of taxes.” The IRS’s audit of the charity was one of the key parts of the Federal investigation that uncovered the scandal.

    The IRS has the option to impose a penalty of 20% of the underpayment, on top of the original tax payment owed. Some parents that paid as much as $75,000 to the foundation could wind up having to pay an additional $15,000, plus interest. The IRS also has the option to impose penalties for civil tax fraud, according to Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, a professor at the University of Notre Dame law school.

    The tax fraud that occurred was a key part of the government’s case. One family said in court documents that they had reported charitable gifts of more than $1 million, which included a payment to the Key Worldwide Foundation.”

    US expats are subject to FBAR (Foreign Bank Account Report) penalties for not declaring an offshore bank account of 50% of the maximum balance PER YEAR. Often these bank accounts earned little or no interest, or the US taxes were paid but the account not listed on TDF forms, so often there were no taxes due anyway.

    Many goyim got caught up in this IRS scam perpetrated by (((Lerner))) and (((Schulmann))) ended paying taxes of over 200% of the maximim balance of a bank account (over a few years) when there was not even a tax liability for it. The IRS passed a special act to make FBAR violations subject to a 6 year SoL instead of 3. They even had a special moniker for this systematic rape of expat goyim: OVDI.

    Very few jews and very few democrats got caught in the IRS FBAR sweep.

  370. ANON[324] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Where in Germany did your family live?

    I lost family in Germany too.

  371. @Fran Taubman

    One of the key unanswerable for the hardcore deniers is why Jews other than working age males and young single women has to be deported from France, Belgium, Holland and Hungary.

  372. dale L ruff says: • Website
    @wayfarer

    Comparing Facebook, which at worst, can ban you, to STASI, which at worst would murder you…absurd.
    Facebook a monopoly? PG & E is a monopoly…you have no choice. The internet gives us hundreds of choices for out news…and I never use Facebook for my news anyway.

    Larry Duggan…a “Stalinist henchman” –the worst kind of name-calling smear. “Laurence Duggan (1905–1948), also known as Larry Duggan, was a 20th-century American economist who headed the South American desk at the United States Department of State during World War II, best known for falling to his death from the window of his office in New York, shortly before Christmas 1948 and ten days after questioning by the FBI about whether he had had contacts with Soviet intelligence.[1][2]

    For many years he was widely thought to be an innocent and loyal public servant who was driven to suicide by unfounded accusations. In the 1990s, evidence from decrypted Soviet telegrams revealed that he may have provided information in 1943-44 to the Soviet Union, a war-time ally, about Anglo-American plans for invading Italy.”

    Wow he gave our allies information about US military plans!

    No wonder white nationalist (Identity politics = white genocide) Paul Craig Roberts calls on Unz as his ally when he needs someone who is Jewish to make his case.

    As I recall, Trump gave Russia (not an ally but officially an “adversary” as describe in the sanctions laws from Congress, top secret information…….an PCR continues to support him, claiming any attempts to impeach or get rid of Trump are treasonous, tho the Constitution defines treason as the very act Trump committed in giving Russia top secret information.

    • Replies: @Alden
  373. @Wizard of Oz

    Ron
    Can you please restore the Edit function which is still down. I don’t like irritating people with typos that myeyes don’t pick up immediately and nay, anyway, be the product of perverse Autofill.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  374. I’m fairly certain that all of the supporters of the zionists will be on the wrong side of history, that is if TRUE history is ever allowed.

    We should question EVERYTHING imo and nothing or no one should be above scrutiny or criticism; However it seems that people of the Jewish faith are, now why is that I wonder, squeaky wheel?

    • Replies: @David Baker
  375. @Cowboy

    The Gilet Jaune, MAGA, Brexit and events in Italy, Hungary and Poland illustrate that the “vast majority” do not agree. What we have had for decades is manufactured consent. This is the result of intimidation, not tolerance and certainly not approval.

    Cowboy,

    You are absolutely correct that indimidation has frightened whites into silence and individual isolation when, as Jews have demonstrated, only noise and consolidated effort have political impact.

    But from my prospective the source of the intimidation is the specter of physical violence, not job or career jeopardy via “doxxing”.

    For the last sixteen presidential elections I’ve resided in non-rural areas of the same midwestern rust belt State. Never have I seen as few yard signs for a major party nominee as was the case in 2016 for the candidate who eventually carried the state – Trump. (Throughout 2016 I resided in an area unsurpassed in Republican Party history and tradition.)

    No question in discussing this with locals during the 2016 campaign and since that fear of violence stopped Trump enthusiasts from displaying yard signs. The fear was not of the sense of violation that comes with yard sign theft, but of property vandalization or physical battery either at home or while out and about after having been identified at the home address.

    The key question then becomes who on the Left do Trump voters (i.e., Republicans of the implicitly white Republican Party per Kevin MacDonald) fear as threatening violence. I say not the LBGTs who have proven obnoxious but not life threatening, not the Mexicans who to date have been law abiding residents in our region, or the Arab Muslims who are few in our town.

    The fear is of the group of whom whites have had mortal fear since the murderous black militants of the late 1960s manifested themselves such that, in general, whites have lived in permanent mortal fear of offending blacks ever since, the cause which has stifled whites to docile political correctness ever since.

    The Jewdia sent out the clear message during the 2016 campaign that Trump supporters were racist. It only energized the white turnout and assertiveness in the privacy of the voting booth, but it kept whitey stealthly silent when not in the safety of numbers at Trump rallies held in secure suburban locations. (As an aside, I say it was those 1960s murderous black militants and not MLK who facilitated all the drastic changes so staggeringly obvious to the detriment of both blacks and whites since.)

    All of this is why Louis Farrakhan’s sonic boom calling out the Jew last October is paramount to the interests of all of us of either Euro or black African descent. Right now only the Jews recognize the potential impact of this game changer mutinizing the domestic shock troops Jews have been exploiting for over half a century to the grave detriment of blacks in whom criminality is encouraged in order to make whites so docilely afraid.

    Blacks have reliably reacted to Jew incitement against whites and most blacks think of Jews as a type of whites, not totally separate from, and proactively genocidally hateful against, whites, as Jews see themselves.

    Farrakhan is making blacks Jew-wise which can only reduce Jew ability to incite blacks against specific political targets like Trump supporters. (Trust me, Farrakhan is heeded by black men in number so far beyond membership of NOI that those who contemplate his words are a majority and may well be a VAST majority.)

    This is why I’ve chosen the screenname used here and why I’ve made extensive efforts as can be seen by clicking on my screenname to chronicle on this site the confluence of opinion mutual among Minister Farrikhan whom the Jewdia portrays as hateful toward whites, Dr. David Duke who the Jewdia portrays as hateful against blacks, and writer Alice Walker whose poem about the Talmud explains the basis for the behavior by Jews about which Duke and Farrakhan relentlessly complain and warn.

    So many Americans with the number growing by the hour realize that our nation’s most immediate critical need is to depose Jew power and free our country from being a colony of Israel.

    But nobody is articulating a path.

    The path to American Freedom and Independence is as Duke and Farrakhan have taken complete risk to mutually express – OVERTHROW JEW TYRANNY by naming and thus knowing the Jew.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  376. @Stan d Mute

    “The meek shall be interred in the earth.”

    Brilliant!

  377. @obwandiyag

    “Troll” is completely inadequate, the forum software needs a “Retard” button for people like you.

  378. Ron Unz says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Can you please restore the Edit function which is still down. I don’t like irritating people with typos that myeyes don’t pick up immediately and nay, anyway, be the product of perverse Autofill.

    It’s fully working on the website. I strongly suspect the problem is that it needs to use a cookie, and your cookies have probably gotten clogged up. If you clear the cookies for this website, it will probably work again.

  379. Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree: “Cowboy, You are absolutely correct that indimidation has frightened whites into silence and individual isolation when, as Jews have demonstrated, only noise and consolidated effort have political impact. ”

    Cultural pressure is intimidating, but no external force compels whites to act as they do, or have the culture that they do. It wasn’t Jews who launched and fought the American Civil War, or who freed the negro slaves and made them citizens, the legal equals of whites. Nor was Jewish control of mass media necessary to achieve that result. America was virtually 100% white and Christian at the time. Large-scale Jewish immigration didn’t come until the 1880s.

    Repeating the canard that external forces compel white behavior absolves whites of moral responsibility for their own actions. That may be comforting for a certain type of conspiracy theorist but it’s ultimately self-defeating, since if we posit that whites are not in control of their own actions, then there is truly no hope for change at all. The culture is the way it is, and has the norms it has, because the vast majority agree with it. They show their approval in the only way that matters, through their behavior.

    Also note that even though Orange Tweetiebird has turned out to be a big disappointment, he was elected over virtually unanimous opposition from the supposedly all-powerful “Jewish controlled” mass media, education establishment, and deep state. This conclusively proves that such entities have substantially less control over events than conspiracy theorists like to claim.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  380. Cowboy says:
    @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    Although I lived most of my early life in the US, I am not a US citizen. I cannot really speak to most of what you are saying.

    I enjoy listening to E. Michael Jones, and he is always talking about the deliberate destruction of the ethnic European neighborhood in the mid west of the US. At the time he is talking about, I was living in the suburbs in Northern California, in a neighborhood cleansed of European ethnicity. For years my best friend on the street was a jew. There were no blacks.

    In Europe most of the towns outside of the population centers never experienced this ethnic invasion. Europeans are not as mobile as Americans anyway, and many families who own much property have been living in the same town or village for centuries. It is my opinion that the towns and villages of Europe will find it far easier to band together for defense when this Talmudic nightmare comes to an end.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  381. @Cowboy

    Assimilation and cultural cohesion/stability are processes which factor religions, traditions, familial structures, emphasis upon education, political ideologies, language, gender roles and disciplinary measures. I am a proponent of multiculturalism, but I do understand racial attitudes and the difficulties inherent in assimilating foreign born and raised people within a given nation. There is one factor which should be addressed concerning racial or religious sects within such environments: No one should receive official recognition for their race, gender or religion. This status serves to undermine cultures, provoking resentment and instability within societies. The process of mixing disparate cultural elements is difficult, but virtually impossible if a government sees fit to designate segments of populations for protection or advantages.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
    , @fnn
  382. @David Baker

    Go easy on me please, like what Grace said that one half of my family killed the other half, that is the plausible theory, that the Jews killed the Jews, how else could they have disappeared? It is a hard truth to digest so just give me some time.

    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @Alden
  383. @Jonathan Revusky

    I am talking about witnesses I am talking about the ones that dissaapeared, whole families arrived at the campus on cattle cars, they were separated, some to have never been after the first day. What do you think happened to them. Aliens arrived and took them away. There were ovens there and ashes, my guess is that they were in the pile of ashes. Just a guess, forgive me if I sound logical.
    I am told on this website that the Jews killed the ones that disappeared, did they have weapons?
    I will repeat: Jews arrived in cattle cars as families where they were separated, after the first day some of the family members were never seen again.
    What do you think happened to them?

  384. @Jonathan Revusky

    These are the way families arrived in Auschwitz:
    Most of these people never came out.
    https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/album_auschwitz/arrival.asp

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  385. Cowboy says:
    @David Baker

    “I am a proponent of multiculturalism”

    Then why don’t you volunteer to pay for your multiculti pets, through all their generations of dysfunction, until they have paid back through taxes their entire share of the public infrastructure and all the assets of the government? By immigrating to another country they are trying to horn in on wealth created over generations. You are facilitating the theft of this wealth, so why don’t you pay?

    Of course, by becoming a citizen of a country, it should be made clear to them that as immigrants they come with full knowledge about how they are voluntarily entering into the “social contract”. Citizens born in a country become subject to the “social contract” involuntarily. Any immigrant who enters the US and then chooses later to leave it should be forced to pay his/her share of the national debt. That is after paying his/her share of the public assets.

    • Replies: @David Baker
  386. @Just passing through

    Zionism is a combination of racial polarization and the need for a Jewish refuge from vengeful populations, who saw their cultures decay, their economies collapse and their sovereignty eroded. Jews were their prime target for culpability for these conditions, and the tribe was unceremoniously expelled. This left them to ingratiate themselves upon other unwary countries for entry and, again, the process of ‘change’ commenced once Jews assembled in significant numbers. Herzl recognized gentile revulsion of his people, and he formulated his “Final Solution” to establish a sovereign nation for Jews–it was actually more of a Safe House, though. Palestine was selected because Jews could claim a religious “Right of Return” to their ancestral home, even though they were not descended from Biblical or Semitic tribes. As I posted earlier, most Jews were less than enthusiastic about the prospect of their pulling up stakes and emigrating to their new Homeland. It took Zionists installing a real asshole named “Hitler” to convince Europe’s assimilated, prosperous Jewish citizens to hit the road.

  387. @Fran Taubman

    If you view the images from any WAR, you’re going to see people herded like cattle. You’ll see POWs crowded into squalid prisons, executions of traitors, spies, belligerents and combatants. It never ceases to amaze me how your tribe projects such revulsion against wars, yet your Israeli leaders keep embroiling American Military forces in their conflicts.

  388. @Fran Taubman

    Would you PLEASE tell us what happened to your family?

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  389. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    What does “large-scale Jewish immigrantion” have to do with anything?

    • Replies: @Anon
  390. @Wizard of Oz

    There’s little question the tech companies are in league with the CIA. If amazon wasn’t fronted by them initially, they’re clearly on board now (e.g. their recent data center venture).

    https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

  391. @Anon

    Orwell was truly brilliant, philo-semitism aside (hey, he was no Derb). In addition to correctly identifying the contours of the (phony) Cold War and the role of the permanent war/fear economy in organizing society, he also correctly anticipated that managerial capitalism could provide enough technological progress to keep the poor sufficiently distracted that they wouldn’t revolt, and hence that ruling elites would have to guard against other threats to their power. He was wrong about the decline of importance of ideology, and failed to see that liberalism would become a weapon against the middle, used by an alliance of the elites and the poor. But still an extremely insightful thinker.

  392. @Cowboy

    I didn’t say I am a proponent of illegal aliens. I don’t believe we need immigrants of any pedigree flooding into the U.S. no matter what justification is offered. America should expel illegal aliens, and seal our borders. Multicultural societies are fine with me. I truly relish different architecture, cuisine, languages, music, traditions and religious practices. The one caveat I will stipulate is that our government should not interfere in the process of stabilizing our cultures. That only serves to expand the government, and create resentment, entitlement and social unrest.

  393. Beefcake the Mighty: “What does “large-scale Jewish immigrantion” have to do with anything?”

    It emphasizes the point that Jews do not control white culture or behavior. Negroes were made the legal equals of whites in the 1860s, when America was virtually 100% white and Christian.

    Jews have only as much power as white people allow them to have.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  394. @David Baker

    Presumably, she was one super-productive girl to be taken out of a “death camp” and nursed back to health in the west, no?

    • Replies: @David Baker
  395. @Wizard of Oz

    How’s it “unanswerable”? No one disputes that the Germans wanted all Jews out of their sphere of influence and instituted harsh wartime measures to effect it. What does that have to do with anything? And why are you trying to have an intelligent conversation with this woman anyway? She’s clearly a loon.

    • Replies: @Anon
  396. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    It emphasizes no point at all because it’s a strawman. No one claims Jews have the power they do because of their sheer numbers.

  397. @David Baker

    You know what happened to them?
    What do you think happened to them, you rewrote the history

    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @Alden
  398. Beefcake the Mighty: “It emphasizes no point at all because it’s a strawman. No one claims Jews have the power they do because of their sheer numbers.”

    Nor did I. Nevertheless, if there are virtually no Jews, as in America of the 1860s, then it should be obvious (except to an idiot, which I hope you are not) that they aren’t in control.

  399. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Fran said:

    I will repeat: Jews arrived in cattle cars as families where they were separated, after the first day some of the family members were never seen again.

    What is your source for THIS information?
    To say it another way, how do you know what you “repeat?” Who told you this?

    I don’t want to seem patronizing, Fran, but you have made very serious charges; all of Jewry has made very serious charges, for many years, with huge things at stake. It’s important to know what is the basis of those charges, if you want people to take you seriously.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  400. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Don’t pretend to be simple. That’s when a critical mass of Eastern European Ashkenazim (not being e.g. Sephardi slave traders and owners or more or less assimilated German sophisticates) began to flood in.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  401. @Alden

    No, this is not new information to me. I have been quite well acquainted with the history. More so than Ron, apparently, since there are a few mistakes and conflations he makes that might appear to be fraud or deception if they aren’t addressed soon.

  402. @Beefcake the Mighty

    Many Jews were “nursed back to health” in those “Death Camps”, including Wiesel and Otto Frank. Hitler’s scheme to exploit his war refugees as laborers would result in thousands of those hapless people dying from diseases, exposure, starvation and suicide.

  403. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    It takes one to know one.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  404. @Fran Taubman

    No, I don’t know what happened to your family. I am asking you what happened to them. I DO know they weren’t gassed, because that canard was debunked. I DO know that the Nazis weren’t plotting the extermination of Jews, nor did Hitler issues orders to that effect. You’re the one projecting the issue of your family being killed. Please tell us how they were killed?

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  405. Zumbuddi says:

    Perhaps your underlying assumption is flawed.
    This video gives evidence that Jews dominated the U S slave trade from its very beginning

    Jews have been small but highly influential part of U S from its beginning.

    • Replies: @anon
  406. @David Baker

    I don’t know that they were gassed, they went into Auschwitz with their family, mother, father, 2 daughters and a son. The mother died of Typhoid, Only the two daughters survived, no traces of the son and father. This happened to many people.
    The daughter came to American, some cousins went to Argentina.
    What does your research say happened to all of the Jews who went into Auschwitz and never came out? Some people still think they were gassed, you viewpoint is a minority.
    Why don’t you look at these photos of all the people going in, where did they all go?
    Most people on the planet including the 2 daughters think their family was gassed and cremated.

    If you know the real story why do you care what happened to my family? It is just a lie to you.

    https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/album_auschwitz/arrival.asp

    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @Wally
  407. @anonymous

    Why don’ t you look at these photos of people arriving at Auschwitz. All of the survivor are dead, the last one died 2 years ago, so I cannot ask them. You can believe or not believe. That is what they said. They did not strike me as liars.
    Would you lie about something like that. Again just look at the photos, most of them were taken by German SS

    https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/album_auschwitz/arrival.asp

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Wally
    , @Wally
  408. @Anon

    The “critical mass” has absolutely nothing to do with raw population numbers, that’s the strawman. It has to do with economic/financial power, and it’s irrelevant how many poor Polish Jews came to America at the end of the 19th century or (more absurdly) how many Jews were in America at the time of the War Between the States. America’s current problems have nothing to do with immigration patterns 150 years ago, and however misguided the non-Jewish elite at that time were, they are not the cause of the current crisis.

  409. @David Baker

    To be clear, my (sarcastic) comment was not directed at you, but at the official hagiography of Anne Frank, who was not gassed at Auschwitz but was sent back west for convalescence, which clearly contradicts the official line (that all Jews unfit for work were immediately put to death).

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  410. anon[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Zumbuddi

    try this link for the video:

    and if that doesn’t work, a verbatim transcript is here:

    http://originalpeople.org/jews-slave-trade/

  411. BTW, the huge-ass post transcribing the Leo Frank trial is really fucking up convenient navigation of these comments, I think the mods should intervene (i.e. delete it).

    [Thanks! It’s fixed.]

  412. Alden says:
    @fnn

    Frannie , your trying to defend communists against Ron’s and my extensive expertise on the subject is like a 2 year old wanting to learn to drive.

    Most of your pro communist anti McCarthy posts are right out of your high school American history book which is where your knowledge ends. We all read the high school text book chapter on McCarthy. Unlike you, Ron and I read extensively on the subject and know McCarthy was right.

    McCarthy was a tiny blip on the screen. I assume your island is hundreds of miles from the nearest university library. I advise you to get on the library of Congress website and order copies of George Keenan’s and Adolph Brele’s autobiographies and other books.

    Your high school naive superficial posts are just laughable.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  413. Alden says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Frannie, try to think logically. What happened to European Jews during WW2 is an entirely different subject from communist spies working for Russia appointed by President Roosevelt.
    They weren’t all Jews. Many were upper class English descended old Americans.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  414. @Alden

    You directed this to the wrong address, I dunno what you are reading I have never defended McCarthy or communist or said that it was not true, are you reading my stuff. I said that McCarthy abused his power.
    That is all I said. It is not my area of expertise in the least, I know about Roy Cohn and followed the army McCarthy hearing on You Tube.
    I am not fnn

    • Replies: @Alden
  415. Alden says:
    @David Baker

    I wouldn’t go so far as to say nursed back to health.

    Reality is, that if a lot of people are crowded into a hastily built camp, either in frozen N Europe or in yellow fever and malaria ridden southern USA, a lot of people will get sick and will die.

    Remember, WW1 was the first war in history that more soldiers died in combat and from wound than disease brought on by crowded unsanitary conditions.

    If you want to learn about what happens in crowded hastily built outhouse sanitation camps read about the civil war army camps disease and deaths.

  416. Zumbuddi: “Jews have been small but highly influential part of U S from its beginning.”

    Let’s not conflate influence with control, an all too common mistake. Jews may have owned the slave ships, but nobody forced whites to let them dock or purchase their cargo. That was their choice, just as, to return to Unz’s post, it appears that it is now whites’ choice to allow Bezos to continue his “politically correct” censorship. The reason whites do this no doubt has many causes, but as I say above in #250, it’s mostly the cultural influence of the Christian and neo-Christian worldview.

  417. @Beefcake the Mighty

    Anne Frank died days before liberation, they had stopped killing at that point and the Germans were in a stall mode, She died it is recorded, Frank and her sister who died of Thyphus just gave up.
    You cannot make something like she went west and survive up.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  418. @Alden

    I agree you are mixing me up with another commentator.

  419. @Ron Unz

    Thanks Ron.

    FYI

    This is my first attempt to see if I have done at least part of what is necessary. The Samsung smartphone User Manual – even for Note 9 – is pretty well useless and online searches for, e.g “How do I remove a Website’s cookies from a Samsung Note 9 phone” don’t provide useful directions. So…

    I usually use Chrome for Unz Review (it is the default when I get an email advice of a reply and click to see it in a browser) but now I have, I think, gone into Samsung’s Internet (it is Microsoft’s Internet Explorer I think) and, via Settings etc. attempted to clear its cache. I have had to restate my moniker and real or fake email address for the moniker and I shall attempt to edit this.

    If I succeed you will see the word “Bingo” added below. Whether it translates to Chrome remains to be seen.

  420. @David Baker

    Yes they did have a violinist following them everywhere with little tiki sticks held hight with lampshades made of human skin, one on each side of the survivor. Didn’t you see any of them go down the street, there are photos somewhere.
    Dang they are all dead now, violinist out of work, you hiring. We will throw in the lampshades

  421. @Ron Unz

    Oops! I was on the point of sending the “Bingo” confirmation that, at least on Samsung’s browse, the clearing of the cache and cookies had restored the Edit function when I discovered that my mysteriously slow Internet or just WiFi connection had left me only 5 seconds to do it.

    Now I shall check the Chrome version. BTW I haven’t found, after lots of searching and experiment, any way to deal with just one website’s Cookies. (And when I went via Settings to my list of installed Apps that might allow tuning of various aspects I didn’t see Unz Review at all despite it being on my Home page and frequently used. It confirms perhaps that computing devices have long since learned a bit about being the humans they want to be: cussed, bloody minded and contrary).

  422. @Fran Taubman

    No idea what you’re babbling about now. She was at Auschwitz, contracted typhus (here’s a hint, that’s why the Germans had gassing facilities, for delousing), and was sent (west) to Bergen-Belsen for treatment, where, yes, she died (I didn’t claim she survived the war). It should be obvious how her story contradicts the official narrative. And it should also be clear that you are too emotionally unstable to be debating this issue.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  423. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    It’s about disproportionate influence. Why do you find this so hard to understand?

  424. Alden says:
    @Grace Poole

    Shrunken heads? Really? I heard about the human skin lampshades and soap made from human fat and crematorium ashes but shrunken heads.

    I always wondered about the human fat soap. If they were so starved where did the fat come from? If they still had fat the Kapos must have removed it, scrapped it off before the trip to the crematorium

    Shrunken heads what will they think of next.

  425. Alden says:
    @Fran Taubman

    You’ve bounced back and forth between attacking McCarthy and preaching holocaustism for this entire thread.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  426. @Ron Unz

    Now I am using Chrome and only the first of my boring replies on this housekeeping matter has appeared. It looks as though, unsurprisingly, I shall have to remove ALL cookies from Chrome and perhaps clear its cache. If not I shall edit this and add “Bingo for Chrome”.

  427. Alden says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Exactly and it was a Protestant judge in Virginia 1654 who instituted slavery in America by judicial order and an African named Antoine Johnson who thus became the first Slave owner.

  428. @Ron Unz

    Now Chrome cookies/cache have been deleted (I think) – with a curious choice of a few sites given to me for which I could choose to not delete the cookies, though not including UR – and I note that my moniker and email address haven’t been deleted as for the other browser. So…

    Here goes with an attempt to send on Chrome a Reply/Comment which can be immediately edited – to add “Bingo”.

  429. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    OK Fran, I looked at the photos.

    Are they photos of YOUR family?

    Which persons in the photos are YOUR family members?
    What was taking place in the photos that include YOUR family members?

    It’s extremely difficult to force our brains to erase the emotionally-embedded interpretation we’ve been convinced to place on certain photos and events, but it’s an interesting exercise, and a smart and intellectually honest person finds it satisfying.

    The photos can mean all sorts of things: I understand that this is not what you have been told the photos mean, but consider this:

    1. The Allies were bombing German cities fiercely. Jews in USA, in England, in Germany itself, and in TelAviv were 100% aware that German cities were being firebombed, with the intention of killing as many civilians as possible. That’s a fact. US government agencies have produced documents that report those facts.

    2. We also know that zionist leaders collaborated with German government leaders in many ways, and that zionist leaders had at least 2500 German Jews on the Allied payroll, working for USA, in Europe, throughout the areas where action was taking place. These German Jewish members of the of US military were well aware of the concentration camps: they traveled to and into and from the camps.

    3. There is a letter at the US Holocaust Museum in DC that states that in June, 1944, David Ben Gurion and his fellow decision makers in Tel Aviv “thought Auschwitz was a labor camp.” Whatever else this tells us, it says that Jewish leadership in TelAviv had solid information about what was going on in concentration camps. Ben Gurion and his team decided NOT to ask Allied to bomb Auschwitz because they did not want to be responsible for “harming a single Jew.”

    4. Again: erase the interpretations of events that you have been persuaded to believe.
    Try to stack up these bits of information in a different way:

    Given that zionist Jews and German government WERE collaborating;
    and Given that Allies WERE BOMBING German cities;
    isn’t it POSSIBLE that Jews were removed from German to camps, to save them from being killed in Allied firebombing raids?

    Is it POSSIBLE that what you see in those photos at Yad Vashem are German Jews like your relatives, that zionist Jews, working WITH German government and SS, are moving out of harm’s way, moving German Jews out of the cities in Germany where Allies are firebombing German civilians?
    I wonder if your surviving relatives have number tattoos?
    If they do, it would bolster my argument that Jews were moved away from firebombing sites for “safe keeping.” People were kept track of: like the migrants in detention centers at US southern border.

    If I were you, the first question I’d ask is, Why would Germans do that?
    Cue Ilhan Omar: It’s the Benjamins, baby.
    We know that Eichmann made bargains with Hungarian Jews to exchange money or goods for a certain number of Jews.
    We know that very many rich Jews bought their way out of the war zones in Europe. Germany needed the money to run the war; Jews had the money to buy their way out.

    I’ll bet that next you will say, That doesn’t tell me what happened to my relatives.
    And that’s absolutely true.

    It’s possible to conceive that the devastation in Germany got out of hand. Firebombing was far, far more devastating that Allies wanted to admit. People died in the camps because the means of getting food and medicine to the camps had been bombed. USA and British planes even bombed Nordhausen camp: they bombed on one day; people in the camp fled to the fields and to ‘shelter’ in railroad cars, and the next day Allied firebombers came back and killed the people in the field and in the railroad cars. They blamed the deaths on the Germans, and even used pictures of the destruction at Nordhausen to prosecute and execute Germans in Nuremberg trials.

    When the hot war was over and more people might have the ability to view the horror the Allies had brought down on Germany, it was essential to devise a coverup. Just like Nordhausen, the Allies lied: ask any 10 people what they know about the firebombing of Germany; they might say, Dresden, but that was only one of thousands of air raids on German cities.

    Your relatives might have died in one of those camps that Allies bombed.
    Or they might have died in a camp where typhus ran viral, due to the destruction of means of obtaining food and medicine.

    But they did not die in gas chambers.

    Untold thousands of people were buried in mass graves AFTER the war, BY ALLIES. Corpses were bulldozed into pits, then the pits backfilled. Allied forces carried out these activities — it’s a fact.

    Allies needed to create a cover story, a way to blame someone else for the horrors that were brought about by FDR & Churchill’s demand for UNCONDITIONAL Surrender; and they needed to cover up the utter destruction of Germany, by Allies.

    enough.

  430. @Ron Unz

    Dammit. No, presumably I must find out how to delete more Chrome cached stuff because neither the last reply to you nor, of course, the Edit function appeared.

  431. @Ron Unz

    Finally?? I have now followed, I trust, Samsung’s (Chrome’ s?) semiliterate and uncertain instructions and deleted the cache (apart from two sites specifically mentioned as options) so I repeat my experiment with UR in Chrome. I have reopened the UR App from the Home Page and note that my moniker and nominated email address are still there…..

  432. @Ron Unz

    Nope. It hasn’t worked. It appears I’ll have to give up on Chrome for UR…. If you know/anyone knows what the problem might be I would be grateful for a heads up.

  433. @anonymous

    I Hope you have a day job that is grounded in reality.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  434. @Beefcake the Mighty

    She doesn’t have a story she is dead. But another inmate spoke to her the day before she died, no she was not gassed, you suggested that she was nurtured back to health in the west.
    Back attach Beefcake with the emotional instability part.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  435. Alden says:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    You watch 60 minutes. You’re a braver man than I am.

    • Replies: @Hamlet's Ghost
  436. @anonymous

    Your ability to protect yourself from the obvious is amazing.

    You appear to equating the firebombing of German cities to (real or just supposed) Holocaust events but killing those civilians who worked directly or indirectly to provide armaments and didn’t choose (or weren’t allowed by their own side) to escape to the countryside like so many Londoners is quite different from what was done to Jewish and other prisoners.

    The idea that Jews but not German families were removed from German cities to protect them from firebombing is beyond barking mad! What is more it says nothing about the deportations from France, Hungary etc.

    Whichever side you are really batting for you are trying too hard and risking a breakdown.

    • Agree: Fran Taubman
    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Fran Taubman
  437. Zumbuddi says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “It was their choice,” to run a slave ship, owned by Jews.

    It is the “choice” of thousands of young men & women to work their tails off in college in order to work for Goldman Sachs.

    There’s a boiling frogs element in the process of making that choice. (Less so for slabers.) You want to provide for your children? You become an Econo.ic Hit Man.

    BTW, it’s almost impossible to avoid “choosing” Bezos, or Google, or acquiescing to govt. Invasion of privacy. Only by rowing the Atlantic can you avoid TSA gropers.

  438. @Fran Taubman

    I’m not the one who can’t recognize sarcasm. Although, the point I was making wouldn’t be any more palatable to you. You really have serious issues.

  439. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fran Taubman

    fuck you Fran Taubman.

    I spent a bundle of my time being as compassionate and patient as I could be.

    You’re sick.
    Your whole tribe is sick.

    If it were just your problem, I would walk away.

    But your psychopathology is destroying the entire world.

  440. @Alden

    I never attacked McCarthy or his premise. Can you hold 2 opposing views together in your mind at one time, can you understand the fast pace explanation of gray areas, or are you a strictly linear, black white guy thinker, because my point is a little gray.

    I will try and explain this one more time:
    You can be correct on the issues (McCarthy) but incorrect on the administration of the truth. You can be a bad messenger and he was. McCarthy was deeply flawed, so was Cohn.

    The Army McCarthy hearings:
    HE ABUSED HIS POWER, COHN WANTED SOMETHING AND WHEN HE DID NOT GET IT, HE WENT AFTER THE ARMY, WHEN THE ARMY LAWYER (speaking slowly now so try to follow)
    c -o-n-f-r-o-n-t-e-d and mocked McCarthy (the first person not afraid to take him on), and challenged Cohn to turn over all the communist names who were in the army over to the army by sundown. McCarthy than got pissed and told him that his assistant Fisher was a known communist.
    ALL OF THIS DISCUSSION HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETER THEIR WERE COMMUNIST IN THE ARMY OR THE GOVERNMENT, IT WAS A POWER STRUGGLE, and people got pissed off at McCarthy using communist accusing smear techniques to win a special transfer for this shine guy.

    Can you follow that abuse of power, not related to whether McCarhty was right about communist infiltration or not.

    Good luck

  441. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    what was done to Jewish and other prisoners.

    Exactly what WAS done to Jewish and other prisoners, Wizard?

    Be precise.

    Dates
    Places
    Context

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  442. @Wizard of Oz

    I have seen some wackado H denier stories, but this takes the cake, and then …. and then…
    they took the Jews to protect them… and then …. they covered the whole thing up with props from central casting. And when you challenge them they call you unstable and a sicko.
    You can make up shit thats cool. but hey just re read your comment.
    I say look up Elie Wiesle? Is he making up that stuff. You show people getting out of cattle cars with stars on their clothes. Some of those people survived and had relatives that did not. They know what happened to them.
    Thanks for your input Wizard.

    • Replies: @Iris
  443. @anonymous

    Dude just re read your explanation. Patient? You should have read it to someone before you posted, they would have pointed out how preposterous your scenario is.
    You have to give some credibility to the original story.
    It was not a Holywood ending.

  444. @anonymous

    Well said.
    All roads lead to the City of London.
    http://www.911nwo.com

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  445. @anonymous

    1. The Allies were bombing German cities fiercely. Jews in USA, in England, in Germany itself, and in TelAviv were 100% aware that German cities were being firebombed, with the intention of killing as many civilians as possible. That’s a fact. US government agencies have produced documents that report those facts.

    You do realize that most of the deportations, and liquidation of the Ghettos, were done way way before the bombing of German cities, the deportations were done during the German assent when they were they were doing the bombing of London and taking over Poland. Nothing to do with the end of the war. Prior to deportations, there were Jewish ghettos, where there were records kept of the deportations. Like the Warsaw Ghetto, the photos in the album were the deportations of the Hungarian ghetto, look at those faces, do these people look like they came from cities where they were doing well, these faces are tired worn out and terrified, I cannot look at those photos without tearing up.

    2. We also know that zionist leaders collaborated with German government leaders in many ways, and that zionist leaders had at least 2500 German Jews on the Allied payroll, working for USA, in

    Europe, throughout the areas where action was taking place. These German Jewish members of the of US military were well aware of the concentration camps: they traveled to and into and from the camps.

    Can you site any source from this or who those 2500 zionist Jews on the allied payroll. They traveled to and from the camps. Did they take photos? You need to look at the faces in those photos. The conditions they were in. Most Jews in Europe at that time were being hunted down. No-one traveled back and forth from the camps.

    Given that zionist Jews and German government WERE collaborating;
    and Given that Allies WERE BOMBING German cities;
    isn’t it POSSIBLE that Jews were removed from German to camps, to save them from being killed in Allied firebombing raids?

    Again your war timing is way off, bombing was not going on till the end of the war, all of the concentration deportations and gassings were done way way before. You should google WW2 or get a book. The rise and fall of the third Riech by william shire.

    Even if you do not believe that gassings occurred it is well documented that the Jews were liquidated from their towns rounded up in mass graves and shot.
    I also find it hard to believe that the Germans would transport German Jews to safety leaving the regular Germans to get killed from the bombing. I mean stop and think about that for a minute.

    • Replies: @Wally
  446. Beefcake the Mighty: “It’s about disproportionate influence. Why do you find this so hard to understand?”

    The Jews have precisely the amount of influence that white people allow them to have. Why do you find THAT so hard to understand? In fact, letting Jews into the country at all was a choice whites made a long time ago. They could have kept N. America for themselves, but quite self-consciously didn’t. Besides that, what’s a disproportionate influence is largely a matter of opinion. You think it’s disproportionate, but if most American whites agreed with you, they’d act to restrict it. They haven’t, so we have to assume they don’t. If fact, quite the opposite. It seems they approve of most of these things. For example, some point to “disproportionate” Jewish involvement in the civil rights movement, or feminism, or in the push to change America’s immigration policies. But the original, most dramatic change in the negro’s status occurred, as I said, when the country was virtually 100% white and Christian. Plus, white people have repeatedly affirmed and voted for the representatives who put these policies into place. They aren’t rioting, aren’t protesting in any significant numbers, and have yet to make a serious attempt to repeal any of it. To the contrary, the vast majority obey all of those laws and endorse those policies and are quite proud of doing so.

    Zumbuddi: “There’s a boiling frogs element in the process of making that choice. (Less so for slabers.) You want to provide for your children? You become an Econo.ic Hit Man.”

    Undeniably so. Yet in many times and places men have chosen to undergo great hardship or even die rather than act against their beliefs. If whites place their economic well-being above their own racial existence, that’s their choice. Likewise, if they choose to turn a blind eye towards Bezos’ censorship, that’s up to them. There are doubtless a lot of rationales that could be given for such choices, but none of the choices have been forced in any meaningful sense of the word. The only path towards changing this, if there is one, is to understand why they choose as they do. I have no doubt that their Christian and neo-Christian worldview is a big part of why. But simply blaming everything on Jewish “control” is simple-minded; a copout. It’s a path that leads nowhere, as the abject failure of the American racial right over the past 150 years makes clear.

  447. @Alden

    Actually, I rarely watch it. Don’t even have a TV at home. Just happened to catch each segment while visiting kin for the holidays. What are the odds, eh?

    Serendipity-doodah it seems.

    • Replies: @Alden
  448. Iris says:
    @Fran Taubman

    “I say look up Elie Wiesle? Is he making up that stuff.”

    You mean Elie Wiesel the imposter and conman, who pretended to have been incarcerated in a concentration camp?
    Of course he was “making up that stuff”: he wasn’t even present at Auschwitz and was denounced by other inmates. What a deluded and fanatic mind you have.

    http://www.bosnewslife.com/38068-auschwitz-survivor-doubts-elie-wiesels-holocaust-past-in-probe-book

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  449. @David Baker

    I fear you have been repeating yourself for a long period in which you should be taking note of fresh evidence, sometimes midfield documents or diary notes that had been overlooked previously. Given that Hitler and most his senior Nazis didn’t weren’t squeamish about human death or the means of it, and clearly regarded the presence of Jews in the new extended German Reich who weren’t even German, or had rejected Germany and left, as a serious problem I don’t see why you have trouble believing that, as the Madagascar solution became impossible and war activities of labour and everything pressing the elimination of Jews who weren’t fit for slave labour just became the logical solution.

    And is it difficult to believe that the upbringing of many Germans, as Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels and Goering all knew, meant that mass shootings were bad for morale and mental health so other methods of killing people were sought? Pursuing a similar thought, is it surprising that non Russian Jews given a chance to escape a death/labor camp and move West with their now fearful guards would take the chance? Some thoughtless opinionators seem to think camp guards would all be and be seen to be fanatics who would pursue orders from on high to the end 200 per cent. Reality says not.

  450. @anonymous

    If that’s serious you are being dishonest (unless you are very stupid which I concede is a possibility) because the point was entirely about the comparison between the assumed assaults on those who were and those who were not under the constraint of imprisonment.

    • Agree: Fran Taubman
    • Replies: @anonymous
  451. @Ralph B. Seymour

    It reflects badly on you that you do not realise you have linked to either a spoof/hoax or the ravings of a madman.

    Reluctant though one normally might be to question the sanity of a senior academic I am fortified in my willingness to make exceptions by a recent 3 part doco on Australia’s ABC “The Cult of the Family” wherein the Oxford and London physicist Raynor Johnson became head of Melbourne University’s Queens College but ultimately a dangerous loon supporting parapsychology and criminal cruelty to children. Your linked professor sounds even barmier.

  452. @Iris

    Wow Iris that is really convincing, since Wiesle was from a town, you know a location where the entire town including his family were deported. He came from a prominent family, people knew him in his town, more than this Gunter dude, do you believe everything you read?
    He lived a long long life, I doubt this guy was the only concentration camp survivor that knew him, it would be pretty hard to live that long as a fraud. no? I mean think about that.
    He showed his number, He lost his father and mother, and one sister. Don’t be grotesque.

    He existed he came from a town which had many many people who knew him. Why don’t you look at the biography on him then make your decision, there is also a photo of him in the camp. Do you think it came from hollywood. Why would you think he is a fake? No one took this guy seriously
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elie_Wiesel

    Rabbi Köves, who leads the Unified Hungarian Jewish Congregation, shares that view. “How can you steal someone’s identity?”, he asked BosNewsLife at the time. “Wiesel received the Nobel Peace Prize for his books, not for who he was or where he was born.”

    Nikolaus (Miklós) Grüner had been hoping for a similar hearing as shown here at the European Court of Human Rights.

    But Grüner said that the court refused to take him seriously and denied him a fair trial. Last month, he also failed in his attempt to hear his case at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. “They even destroyed my papers saying I didn’t sign it. That was not true. I think there is a conspiracy among European countries. Nobody wants to admit that they gave British, Hungarian and other high state awards to an imposter.”

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Iris
    , @Wally
  453. @Wizard of Oz

    Typos that I couldn’t edit our on my other browser:
    missed
    [most] of
    didn’t [delete]
    shortages [instead of activities]

  454. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Answer the questions with specifics, Wiz.
    Pretend you’re explaining things to your Sinhalese driver.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  455. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    The same Elie Wiesel who said he was given a choice to stay at Auschwitz or retreat with the Germans. Most by far chose to leave with the Germans.

    Some of Wiesel’s exact words in “Night” are (p. 78):

    “The choice was in our hands. For once we could decide our fate for ourselves. We could both stay in the hospital, where I could, thanks to my doctor, get him [the father] entered as a patient or nurse. Or else we could follow the others. ‘Well, what shall we do, father?’ He was silent. ‘Let’s be evacuated with the others,’ I told him.”

    Wiesel’s words are corroborated by other “survivor” accounts including that of Primo Levi. In Levi’s book “Survival in Auschwitz”.

    And this gem:

    “Some stories are true that never happened.”
    – Elie Wiesel

    http://www.codoh.com

  456. Iris says:
    @Fran Taubman

    I am not the one being grotesque here.

    Many have detected that your prophet and principal “source” Elie Wiesel, whose fabrications you have been hammering this thread with, was a fraud and liar. He lied for fame, for money, and to promote the Zionist domination agenda.

    ” The trouble here is that in its central, most crucial scene, Night isn’t historically true, and at least two other important episodes are almost certainly fiction. Below, I cite views, vigorously expressed to me in recent weeks by a concentration camp survivor, Eli Pfefferkorn, who worked with Wiesel for many years; also by Raul Hilberg. Hilberg is the world’s leading authority on the Nazi Holocaust. [..]
    If absolute truth to history is the standard, Pfefferkorn says, then Night doesn’t make the grade. Wiesel made things up, in a way that his many subsequent detractors could identify as not untypical of his modus operandi: grasping with deft assurance what people important to his future would want to hear and, by the same token, would not want to hear.”</i>

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/07/01/truth-and-fiction-in-elie-wiesels-night-2/

  457. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    More on Gruner and Wiesel:

    Elie Wiesel: New Documents, By Carlo Mattogno : https://codoh.com/library/document/4443/?lang=en

    Elie Wiesel: “The Most Authoritative Living Witness” of The Shoah?, By Carlo Mattogno : https://codoh.com/library/document/4441/?lang=en

    Revisionists have it ALL covered.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  458. Wally says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    You said: “sometimes midfield documents or diary notes that had been overlooked previously”

    Please show us these “documents” and “diary notes”.
    Originals, not someones creative & alleged ‘translations’.
    We await.

    you said: “Given that Hitler and most his senior Nazis didn’t weren’t squeamish about human death or the means of it”

    What makes you say that?
    Is that why Jews were given a choice to stay at Auschwitz or retreat with the SS?
    Most chose to leave with the SS, BTW
    Is that why known Jews in Berlin were allowed lived there throughout the war.
    Is that why so many Jews are said to be “survivors’?

  459. @Wizard of Oz

    The Germans were brutal combatants, and were effective in their campaigns, but they observed the Geneva Convention, and they were not involved in any effort to exterminate Jews. Jews declared war on Germany, and they threatened a worldwide boycott of German goods. In case you wonder why Jews would make such statements, it was necessary for Zionists to burn the bridges for their brethren to prevent them from remaining in Europe, or returning from Palestine, as many Jews had done, only to be captured and imprisoned. WWII. Up to the point of WWII, Jews were reluctant to pull up stakes and leave their thriving businesses and comfortable homes. Zionists worked feverishly to convince European Jews that their Homeland beckoned, and 6 million of their tribe was on the verge of annihilation. These articles were published years before Hitler entered the picture, so that 6 million jazz was just exaggeration and–as some suspect–a reference to their scripture.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wizard of Oz
  460. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Hey Fran,

    You should post comments under Anatoly Karlin’s articles.

    That childish shill censors / bans all those who debunk the fake & impossible ‘holocaust’ after he brings up that nonsense in his columns. He hates being confused with facts.

    Perfect for you.

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  461. Wally says: • Website
    @David Baker

    David baker said:
    ” Zionists worked feverishly to convince European Jews that their Homeland beckoned, and 6 million of their tribe was on the verge of annihilation. These articles were published years before Hitler entered the picture, so that 6 million jazz was just exaggeration and–as some suspect–a reference to their scripture.”

    fact:
    Jews have been lying about their fake ‘6,000,000’ since at least 1823.

    see: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12265&p=91192&hilit=1823#p91192

    Thanks.

  462. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    So then tell us how the alleged gas chambers supposedly worked.

    Then show the remains of the alleged 1.2M Jews supposedly still remaining there.

    Quite incredible that those ‘evil Germans’ would allow tons of photos of an alleged ‘top secret operation’.

    Altered aerial photo with drawn in ‘Auschwitz Jews being marched to gas chambers’, ON A ROOF. LOL !!

    Only liars need to alter aerial photos.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @David Baker
  463. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Rooftop of crematorium no. 2 at Auschwitz / alleged ‘gas chamber’:

    Taken January/February 1943, noticee there are no little ‘chimneys’ / columns that are alleged for the alleged insertion of Zyklon-B / cyanide.

    The ‘chimneys’ / columns are claimed to have been ca. 2 feet high. The snow is 2-3 inches high. According to Auschwitz “expert” Robert Jan Van Pelt the ‘chimneys’ / insertion columns, which were said to protrude out from the roof, were added as an adaptation in August, 1942.

    http://www.codoh.com

  464. @Wally

    got to laugh, I am not reading that, it is so stupid

  465. @anonymous

    Well while I am waiting to locate an honest potential beneficiary of up to date information from the Nazi era I don’t mind throwing pearls before swine and this might be an approximation

    http://www.karenliebreich.com/black-page-interviews-nazi-film-makers

    As you showed yourself persistently unable to understand simple logic and plain language I daresay you will answer with another irrelevancy.

  466. @David Baker

    Much of that is true, but irrelevant to the ultimate question of whether, sometime in 1941, the Nazi leadership (I don’t say “the Germans” although, of course, there had to be plenty of Germans conditioned to be obedient executioners) moved on to the final solution by killing or working to death Jews who lived in German occupied Europe.

    I am willing to believe that Hitler not only started by thinking that the Jewish problem – on which, as on its importance, he had well established views – could be solved in Germany by making them pay to export themselves as trouble for the British in Palestine. And he would probably not have felt strong antagonism to most Jews who were effectually assimilated Germans and many of whom had served in WW1 or were currently serving in the Wehrmacht. It was a different matter when he was conquering Lebensraum and had to plan for governing the Greater Reich over much of Europe where there were many Jews with no love for Germany.

    You might find it interesting to follow up the comparativelybnew evidence in books like this one containing interviews by Karen Liebreich

    http://www.karenliebreich.com/black-page-interviews-nazi-film-makers

    I also wonder if you are up to date with the recorded and transcribed interviews and/or diaries recording the memories of many high ranking Nazis secretaries and e.g. Hitler’s valet Heinz Linge who is noted in a recent documentary on the History Channel as having said, repeatedly, that Hitler knew everything, even if the only murders that can be attached to his signature are those of the mentally disabled. Linge died in 1980 so there would be appear to be little excuse for a Hitler apologist not to have come across this before.

  467. @Fran Taubman

    What do you think happened to them.

    People who were deported and never seen again, in most cases died, I would think everybody agrees on that. The most famous deportee who died was Anne Frank, who was deported to the infamous Auschwitz camp and later evacuated to Bergen-Belsen, where she later succumbed to typhus in the last months of the war. February 1945 apparently. (I just looked it up.)

    Of course, Anne Frank is just one case, but again, the most famous single one, and she was deported to Auschwitz and not murdered in any gas chamber. So that most famous case hardly supports the canonical Holocaust narrative. As for all the other deportees who presumably died, one would have to make a study of it. Well, people have made a study of it. Entire books have been written. What have you read? Surely your source of information is not solely your family lore, is it?

    In any case, it seems that your framing of the question is that if I can’t tell you exactly what these people’s cause of death is, then they must have been (a) murdered in gas chambers and (b) there must be (roughly) 6 million of them. And (c) this must have been a genocidal policy of the German government with the goal of murdering every last Jew.

    Of course, that is not valid argumentation.

    Aliens arrived and took them away.

    Look, this is a serious conversation. Or it should be. You shouldn’t be disrespectful like this. It’s completely improper. Though, I admit that some people on the other side of the debate are very disrespectful. I consider the approach of this Wally character (even if I mostly agree with him on the factual issues) to be quite deplorable.

    Actually, I was brought up the same as you to believe all of this unquestioningly. And I did believe it for most of my life and then, well into middle age, this became something I decided to look into and I came to the conclusion that the revisionists like Faurisson and so on were the ones telling the truth.

    Actually, the standard Holocaust narrative, I realize in retrospect, was such a part of my mental world, and it was very mentally oppressive, like look what these Goyim would do to us again if they had a chance… and finally, coming to some understanding of the real history was extremely mentally liberating for me.

    I am told on this website that the Jews killed the ones that disappeared, did they have weapons?

    Well, when you dive into the real history, you learn things that are not very nice, that obviously were airbrushed out of the history. There were, apparently, rival gangs in the camps and actually, for all this talk of a “Jewish people”, Polish Jews, Romanian Jews, German Jews…. they didn’t necessarily have that much affinity for one another. So there probably were some killings that took place between rival groups, some of whom were criminals in their own countries before all this.

    But all the above said, I’ve never heard the narrative that Jews killing other Jews in the camps (though there were surely some cases) constituted any significant part of the deaths. I don’t know who told you that. If you want to know what revisionist historians think, you’d actually have to read some of the literature. I get the feeling you never did.

    I also don’t think that the Germans executed that many Jews either. (I mean in the camps. Mass shootings by the Einsatzgruppen is a completely separate matter, I hope you understand…) Well, they executed some Jews surely, and maybe a lot of them were part of the aforementioned criminal gangs. But I would have to think that most of the deaths were analogous to Anne Frank. The conditions in the camps, probably never great to start with, became very very bad, what with shortages of food and medicines and often quite brutal working conditions. And many people died. I think that’s what happened. And I think that’s the standard revisionist view more or less.

    As for the gas chamber story, as best I can tell, it’s just recycled war propaganda. Nobody has ever seen a gas chamber, nobody has ever seen the blueprints of a gas chamber. Nobody has ever described a protocol for killing hundreds or thousands of people at a pop in a gas chamber and then disposing of the bodies by cremation that is remotely technically feasible. These “Sonderkommandos” who testify that they were dragging out the bodies with their bare hands and putting them in the crematoria — these people are obviously false witnesses. There is no getting around that. The bodies would have been suffused with hydrogen cyanide, which is both highly toxic and highly inflammable. The procedure these people describe is completely impossible.

    It’s quite clear that the gas chambers, the central piece of the horror story, is simply a fiction.
    Once you figure that out, you then have to try to figure out how much of the story is true. To say that people were deported and never seen again and almost certainly died, that is just as consistent with the revisionist position as the standard Holocaust story. That is a key point that you really ought to try to understand.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Anon
  468. @Fran Taubman

    These are the way families arrived in Auschwitz:
    Most of these people never came out.
    https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/album_auschwitz/arrival.asp

    What you are showing as evidence for the conventional history is just as consistent with what the revisionist side is saying.

    Deborah Lipstadt, the high priestess of Holocaustianity, says that the Holocaust is 3 things:

    (a) exterminationist intent of the German government
    (b) mostly killed in homidal gas chambers
    (c) roughly six million

    That is the narrative. What you linked does not prove a, b, or c.

    I believed in all this for most of my life, but in the last few years, I have convinced myself that a, b, and c are all false. People like Faurisson and Germar Rudolf have concentrated mostly on b, since it is the one that, on technical scientific grounds, can really be attacked rigorously. I think they demonstrated to a high level of overkill that the gas chambers story is just not tenable. Really, once you take the time understand the key technical issues, the gas chamber narrative is about as believable as WTC 7 imploding from office fires on 9/11.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  469. Alden says:
    @dale L ruff

    Jonathan Pollard also gave a lot of secret information to our greatest ally, Israel.

    There is an excellent reason giving information to allies is so restricted to certain people and not just any government employee.

    Once information goes to an ally, it can go anywhere. For instance, the Israelis sold traitor Pollard’s information to both Russia and China.

    Communist Italians were extremely active and powerful during WW2. In fact, the very well organized communists in constant contact with soviet spies de facto ruled many rural mountainous areas especially in N Italy.

    The Rosenbergs Greenglass Gold and half the scientists at Los Alamos gave information to our soviet ally.

    The FDR administration was run by communists. But they were only Roosevelt employees. Other government departments, especially the military knew very well that the USA soviet alliance was very temporary and that the Russians fully intended to take over all of Europe when the war ended.

    The information sent by Duggan was probably meant to help the soviets take over Italy when the war ended.

    You might remember that the soviets did take over half of Europe after the war.

    It’s naive to think of Russia as an ally in anything but helping them take over Europe after the war.

  470. Alden says:
    @Fran Taubman

    You claim some family members were killed in the holofraud, others survived. So why not tell us the facts about the family members you claim.

    You just repeat the standard stories about cattle cars yellow stars.

    What country did they live in before the war? What relation are they to you? What camps were they sent to?

    I’m an anti Semitic WASP whose ancestors left Europe 400 years ago. But I’ve known survivors and they told me what camps they were in and how the got to America.

    One neighbor and friend was in the Warsaw ghetto and told me all about it. She ended up in California teaching high school French. Daughter in laws grandparents met at Buchenwald as teens and married in Germany immediately after liberation and ended up in California. Wife had some family money and they used to buy real estate.

    Jeweler who designed and made my beautiful white with red flashes opal pendant had a tattoo on his arm. He told me the camp, I forget which one.

    My Mother’s friend Mrs Dekoven immigrated from Poland to America with her parents as a teen in the 1930s. When the war ended all the Polish rematives has disappeared; killed died of disease and malnutrition but gone, an entire extended family.

    New Dekoven and her relatives were real people. The jeweler, daughter in laws grandparents and my friend and neighbor from Warsaw are real people who knew the camps they were in and how they got to America

    I told you about my friend and relatives by marriage. So why don’t you tell us about your relatives who were killed or survived the holocaust.

    Details please, great aunts great uncles the camps who disappeared who survived how did they get to America.

    If an anti Semitic old American WASP has encountered a few genuine survivors who knew the name of the camps they were in and all about life in the Warsaw ghetto, surely you can give us some details instead of history channel documentaries you watched on TV.

  471. Wally says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    said:
    “Mass shootings by the Einsatzgruppen is a completely separate matter, I hope you understand…) Well, they executed some Jews surely, and maybe a lot of them were part of the aforementioned criminal gangs. ”

    [MORE]

    Indeed, Jews were active in the terrorist, non-uniformed, illegal ‘partisans’ and were often legally executed when caught. The Allies did the same thing.
    However, it’s not really separate since The Usual Enemies of Free Speech laughably say that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were supposedly shot by the Einsatzgruppen just because they were Jews. So, anyone, please SHOW us the actual excavations, the enormous mass graves, & remains that are claimed to exist, their precise locations are allegedly known. Is that:
    100 graves of 20,000?
    200 graves of 10,000?
    400 graves of 5,000?
    500 graves of 4,000?
    1000 graves of 2000?
    2000 graves of 1000?
    i.e.:
    Excavation Result: No Enormous Human Remains as Alleged at Babi Yar … of course: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11314
    recommended
    The Einsatzgruppen Trial, By John Wear: https://codoh.com/library/document/5515/?lang=en
    The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories, Genesis, Missions and Actions
    https://codoh.com/news/3424/

    • Replies: @Jonathan Revusky
  472. @Wally

    Is that why known Jews in Berlin were allowed lived there throughout the war.

    Could you be more specific on this point, please? Could you provide some names, for instance?

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  473. @Wally

    However, it’s not really separate since The Usual Enemies of Free Speech laughably say that ca. 2,000,000 Jews were supposedly shot by the Einsatzgruppen just because they were Jews.

    I agree with you that the numbers were nothing like that. What I guess happened is that they started having a big deficit in terms of the numbers they could say died in the camps, what with having to reduce the death toll at Auschwitz from 4 million to below a million, so then they started blowing up the numbers for the Einsatzgruppen to try to keep the total up. But, of course, it’s just nonsense, I agree.

    However, my basic point stands: the shootings by Einsatzgruppen and deaths in the camps really are two completely separate issues that would have to be studied separately.

    And, this business before, where I asked who was doxxed, and you start talking about Faurisson and Germar Rudolf and others.. well, those people were never doxxed, because they never hid behind a mask to start with. I was asking a specific question and you didn’t even bother to understand it before jumping in with some canned response.

    I pointed that out and then you idiotically escalate by calling me a “hasbarist”. Well,… what to say…. Basically, a man does not behave like that. I show my face and I argue the things I argue and I sign my name to it. If you aren’t willing to do what I do, then you have no business engaging in personal insults like that. I’m a man and if you want to insult me, be a man yourself.

    In general, I agree with your position on Holocaust revisionism (though it seems to be about the only issue you understand) but most of what you do is counter-productive, mostly because you’re just such a jerk that it would turn anybody off what you’re saying even when it is factually correct.

    • Agree: utu, Beefcake the Mighty, L.K
    • Replies: @David Baker
    , @Wally
  474. @Wally

    There were other doctored photos, including one Death Camp image which depicted smoke billowing out of a crematory chimney. This photo was displayed in a Holocaust Museum, but then was removed after it was discovered to be altered. The smoke was airbrushed onto the picture. These shenanigans prove two things:

    1. Jews don’t know much about crematoriums.

    2. Jews don’t have viable proof of their Death Camps, so they invent that proof.

    • Replies: @Wally
  475. @Fran Taubman

    “I don’t know if they were gassed…” Well, maybe Wiesel watched them being thrown alive into flaming trenches. Arnold Friedman could possibly have recognized the color of the smoke emanating from the crematorium chimney to positively identify your family. If you people are going to employ the fate of your relatives to validate Holocaust claims, at least have the decency to describe how they were killed.

  476. Wally says:
    @David Baker

    You mean this typical fake:

    altered photo:

    real photo:

    [MORE]

    Just a few more found at CODOH, the tip of the endless fake photo iceberg:
    fake Einsatzgruppen shooting photos – only liars need fakes: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=441
    and:

    caption: Photo taken from the body of a dead German officer killed in Russia, showing a Nazi firing squad shooting Jews in the back as they sit beside their own mass grave, in Babi Yar, Kiev, 1942.
    and:
    Picture of ‘jew being forced into gas chamber’: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12124

    • Replies: @David Baker
  477. @Jonathan Revusky

    Tens of thousands of Concentration Camp inmates died as the German Transportation System collapsed. We’re shown images of stacks of bodies, mass graves being filled with bodies by bulldozers, cremation ovens filled with remains, etc. What we’re NOT shown are the identifications of those bodies. It was initially revealed that 4 million Jews were deliberately exterminated at Auschwitz. Now, the total number has been reduced to 1.5 million, and the vague reference to Jewish deaths is acknowledged with the phrase “Mainly Jews”, as if that tribe somehow warrants special recognition for their casualty count. Yet, the 6 Million figure remains as the official Jewish Death count, as if simple math principles are suspended in this case.

    What truly should be evident that the Jews are losing ground in their campaign to validate that 6 million canard are laws which forbid–by penalty of imprisonment–any questioning of the data, or forensic research of Jewish Holocaust claims. Many brave and resolute revisionists have felt the wrath of these people, as they languish in prisons. When you have to enact laws to prevent historical research, you don’t have any leg to stand on with your version of history.

  478. Wally says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Give me a break, it’s not so easy as that.

    The ‘holocaust Big Lie incorporates a ‘holocaust by bullets’ element, they are not separate, in spite of what you claim.
    The false 2,000,000 Einsatzgruppen claim is part of the bogus 6,000,000, and you know it but want to cling to it for an attempt at ‘holocaust-lite’ which has no more proof than the absurd ‘gas chambers’ claims. I won’t let you get away with it.

    Sorry, but I pointed out numerous examples more egregious than doxxing and you simply cannot deal, your problem.
    Your ‘agreeing’, impossible gas chambers True Believer utu shredded here: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-post-war-france-and-post-war-germany/ comment 429

    Beefcake? Well, he’s coming around.

    http://www.codoh.com

  479. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    said:
    “What does your research say happened to all of the Jews who went into Auschwitz and never came out? ”

    But you have no proof they did not “come out”, you have no roof they are missing, or were murdered.
    You ignore the fact that rules of logic & jurisprudence state that the onus is upon the accuser, you.

    I posted numerous examples of ‘what happened to them’ in comment 329, and of course you dodged them all.
    Another example:
    In the late 1990s the teams put in charge by Steven Spielberg of gathering survivors’ testimonies had to go to nearly sixty different countries to record the said testimonies on video

    http://www.codoh.com

  480. @Wally

    This is also of interest:

    http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2015/06/we-all-know-dont-we-that-during-ww-2.html?m=1

    Going by memory, but I believe in Peter Winter’s book, he points out that, whatever else was decided at Wannsee, Jewish veterans of the German army in WW1 would be exempted, and elderly German Jews would be interned in relatively better camps like Theresienstadt.

  481. fnn says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Apparently you don’t understand that the fact that they had to work through pseudonyms or flee to another country undermines your point. As I said, non-conformity is persecuted.

    No I understand, but apparently you don’t. Today those options aren’t open to contemporary dissidents due to the pervasiveness of the surveillance state and doxxing and the same ideology of Globohomo/cultmarx being hegemonic and virtually mandatory in North America, Western Europe and Australia/NZ. Mexico is (I hope you understand) a far more unfriendly environment than it was in 1950s. And (since I have to spell everything out) they don’t want (or need to have) gringos directing their films these days.

  482. fnn says:
    @David Baker

    Tri-racial liberal Jamaican academic says “assimilation” is mostly a myth:
    https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2017/02/08/the-genetics-of-the-american-nations/

    …all human behavioral traits are heritable, with “nurture” (as it’s commonly thought of) playing a minimal to nonexistent role in each. This means that genetic differences between different peoples lead to differences in their behavioral traits, which, collectively, manifests as cultural differences. As John Derbyshire put it, “if dimensions of the individual human personality are heritable, then society is just a vector sum of a lot of individual personalities.”… assimilation is largely an illusion. Cultural and behavioral characteristics can persist for many generations as long as the people who exhibit them remain.

    https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2016/12/19/clannishness-the-series-how-it-happened/

    . Often we hear that the clannish/honor-based behavior of those from beyond the Northwestern European world can be corrected through “assimilation.” Unfortunately, assimilation is largely an illusion…What we see as “assimilation” is largely when the “assimilated” group adopts superficial aspects of the host group. Other behaviors remain (Those Who Can See: Were you Assimilable?). As well, intermarriage with host group and selective migration can both give the appearance of assimilation, as can long-run secular changes (the kind that affect everyone, such as the move towards secularism, for example).

    • Replies: @David Baker
  483. @fnn

    Assimilation being officiated by government should be a myth. People either learn to live with each other, or they coalesce with their own kind in ghettos. I enjoy visiting cultural ghettos such as China Towns, Dutch Villages, Little Saigon’s, etc. People should be proud of their heritage, and display their pride within these settings

  484. @Wally

    Yes. There’s many more where that came from. I had to laugh when I saw those shrunken heads on the evidence table. These people can really lay it on thick.

  485. @Wally

    The false 2,000,000 Einsatzgruppen claim is part of the bogus 6,000,000, and you know it but want to cling to it for an attempt at ‘holocaust-lite’ which has no more proof than the absurd ‘gas chambers’ claims. I won’t let you get away with it.

    You really have reading comprehension issues, Wally. I specifically said that the claim that the Einsatzgruppen killed 2,000,000 was nonsense. So we agree on that!

    There were Einsatzgruppen and there were atrocities where Jews were killed, but the total was nothing like that. You’re arguing with me as if I was the one making the claim (2,000,000 killed by Einsatzgruppen) that I was specifically saying was nonsense.

    This other thread where you call me a “hasbarist” started when I asked about people who were doxxed. (And lost their jobs as a result.) And then you responded talking about Faurisson and Germar Rudolph and others. Obviously, they were never doxxed because those people were never anonymous in the first place!

    Why don’t you resolve to actually read the things you’re replying to before replying?

    And what I said about the Holocaust being the only issue you understand… well, actually, as I recall, you understand 9/11, at least somewhat. But aside from that, you’re the kind of idiot who believes everything he reads in Breitbart.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wally
  486. fnn: “No I understand, but apparently you don’t.”

    That’s right, I don’t. Your initial response was to challenge my statement that culture itself, like state power, is based on intimidation; i.e., that non-conformists to cultural norms are ostracized and/or persecuted. This subsequent response of yours again admits that they are. Looks like you’ve refuted yourself again. Good job!

    • Replies: @fnn
  487. Wally says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    You have weasel word issues. Work on it will you?
    you said:
    “There were Einsatzgruppen and there were atrocities where Jews were killed, but the total was nothing like that. ”

    – So what was the total then?
    – What atrocities do you faithfully believe in?
    Where were they?
    Show us the alleged immense human remains.

    Let’s go weasel boy, let’s talk Einsatzgruppen.

    I pointed out much worse actions against Revisionist scholars than doxxing, and you just don’t like it. Too bad, deal with it, airhead.

    Your ‘holocaust-lite’ game is being called out for the BS that it is, and I’m the one doing it, you don’t like that either. I enjoy it.

    Show me where I’m wrong about what I post here. This will be hilarious. You’re all talk.
    Breitbart? Ah yes, another strawman from a dimwit.

  488. Wally says:
    @Andrew E. Mathis

    LOL Desperation time for a discredited Zionist, fake ‘holocaust’ pusher.

    – Those nonsensical links have nothing to do with the beat downs you took trying to debate the laughable ‘holocaust’ at CODOH.

    – Let’s see now, that’s 4-5 different people you have claimed that I am.
    Low IQ Zionist, you can’t even keep your lies straight. Yikes.

    – And from what I know, you have claimed that guy in your links is about 12 different people as well. Talk about desperate and owned, you are that. LOL

    Everyone really needs to read this too, Andrew Mathis, the fraud, exposed:
    http://www.angelfire.com/fl4/fci/andysjew.html

  489. Wally says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Hey Jonathan:

    Speaking of doxxing, see comment 492 above where sleazy Zionist and ‘holocaust’ pusher Andrew Mathis tries and fails miserably to dox people. Not successful, but hey, hilarious & desperate creeps are out there.

    I mean he bungles everything he tries.

    To wit: note that he was seriously shredded trying to debate at CODOH.
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4451&p=72138&hilit=mathis+thames+mulegino#p72138

    He lost big time and just can’t handle it.

  490. @Wally

    That is true of most H deniers, they are intolerable in their devotion to allusion, like the whole idea of faking something on that scale, these people maybe you included are very narrow in their focus and impossible to discuss actual issues with. Like you hold up a potato and say this is a potato, and they go off on prove it. Well you know one just gets exhausted,
    If you had a narrow escape from a disaster, a hurricane for fire, and you come out and have PTSD are exhausted and frightening and people are asking questions like “what fire” where” like you faked it.
    It is truly bind boggling, You can argue numbers and small issues, but the whole thing is not made up.
    It is insulting and disrespectful to survivors and the families that were lost.

    • Replies: @Wally
  491. @Wally

    I know you don’t pay attention to anything that contradicts your preconceived ideas but I have already addressed your last two questions.

    You seem to know nothing of what even an ordinarily calculating quite dim politician would choose in a world where balancing priorities is inevitable, even, in practice, for fanatics. Apart from any personal feelings Hitler (and other leading Nazis) might have had for particular German Jews they knew they would have been conscious of the need to be very careful in the way they were seen to deal with Jews known to have served their country in WW1 or currently in the armed forces. Equally, they would have known that a lot of professional and (upper) middle class Germans, especially in Berlin and other large cities had Jewish friends, neighbours and colleagues whose welfare they would value above any respect (very likely none) they had for Nazis. The solution of Germany’s JP (and, remember no morethan 1 per cent of the population even in 1933) was well under way before war started but the huge numbers of foreign Jews in conquered territories multiplied the JP many times over. As to the apparently voluntary departure from Auschwicz it takes little knowledge of people to understand that e.g. the prisoners might well have seen how fearful their guards now were and how willing to curry favour; also that they might have been told horror stories about the Red Army that made them prefer the devil they knew.

    • Replies: @Wally
  492. @Wally

    Well if you heard one H denier you do not need to have it heaped on you. You H deniers are hard to take it wears you out. Like hold up a potato and say this is a potato and you guys say. Prove it.
    It is just exhausting.

  493. @Fran Taubman

    You claim it’s exhausting, yet somehow you’ve managed to tough it out. You’re an inspiration to us all.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  494. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “Preconceived”?

    Cut the juvenile crap. I used to believe like others. All Revisionists are former Believers.

    I /we finally applied science and rational thought to the absurd ‘holocaust’ claims, and there it was, recognition that we had been duped. I recommend that you give it a try. Knowledge is freedom.
    I also see throughout this site your failure to refute anything about the fake & impossible “holocaust” that I have posted. I realize cognitive dissonance can be difficult, all Revisionists experienced it.

    Moving on, you tell us that pols curry favor with their constituents? Not exactly earth shattering news. But so what?

    you said: ” As to the apparently voluntary departure from Auschwicz it takes little knowledge of people to understand that e.g. the prisoners might well have seen how fearful their guards now were and how willing to curry favour; also that they might have been told horror stories about the Red Army that made them prefer the devil they knew.”

    No doubt they heard very real horror stories about the barbaric Red Army, hence chose the safety of the Germans.
    The fact remains that if the claims about what was happening at Auschwitz were factual, the Germans simply would not have left thousands behind to tell of it.
    I also challenge you to back up your description of the Germans as the “devil they knew”.
    http://www.codoh.com

  495. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    IOW, you cannot prove your claims, but you faithfully believe anyway.

    Like I said, it’s a primitive religion.

    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  496. @Beefcake the Mighty

    It ‘s a challenge, mostly because it is so specific. Not of the H deniers were there, but the survivors were. How do you deal with that. The entire premises of denial is based on the suspension of reality, you want the people who were there who suffered and lost family to prove it, yet those who deny it only have to show smoke stacks, there were people who lived thru it. Most children in those camps who came off those trains perished, children could not work, it is so sad to think of that and then run into a H denier that says they are somewhere in Canada we just must have lost contact.

    • LOL: Wally
  497. @Wally

    Thanks for that comment Wally. I was beginning to think that I was loosing my mind with lost family family. Then I saw your comment about my primitive religion and it all became clear, how could have I have let my primitive religion mess with me so, where Id id not see those unpleasant facts you are talking about.
    Then I thought of E=MC2 and I thought now how would someone as bright as Wally prove that equation was true? What facts does he have? I realized that the guy who wrote that equation was one of the most brilliant minds of the 20th century and felt much better because he was part of my primitive religion.
    You know what Wally us primitives are in good company. But thanks for thinking that Betranad Russel telling me how weak and primitive I am might make me see the light.
    Think on that E=MC2. He lost family in the H also.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Wally
    , @ANON
  498. fnn says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    The current regime is quasi-totalitarian and almost universal , unlike what we’ve experienced before. You can’t escape to the frontier, or go to France or England like James Baldwin or the Commies and fellow-travellers did.

    There is no escape.

  499. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    Ah yes, the fake genius Einstein being thrown about by someone who has had her head handed to her about the equally fake ‘holocaust’.

    Exposing the Real Albert Einstein: https://principia-scientific.org/exposing-the-real-albert-einstein
    Albert Einstein was a Fraud; http://coconutrevival.com/?p=5656
    Einstein, plagiarist of the century: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm
    Jew icon Einstein was rabidly racist, xenophobic: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/12/einsteins-travel-diaries-reveal-shocking-xenophobia
    and:

    That was easy.

  500. Wally says:
    @Fran Taubman

    “He lost family in the H also.”

    Proof? Nope …. again.

  501. Wally says: • Website
    @Fran Taubman

    “It is insulting and disrespectful to survivors and the families that were lost.”

    Except that you cannot prove they were murdered. It’s really that simple.

    So many $urvivors utterly debunks the ‘holocaust’ story which claims ‘the Germans tried to kill every Jew they could got their hands on’.

    There many, many more “survivors / eyewitnesses” to witchcraft, so witchcraft must be true. With court trials, and real documents.

    To not accept the truth of witchcraft is insulting and disrespectful to “survivors / eyewitnesses” and their families.

    Witchcraft Documents, Testimony, Eyewitnesses: http://salem.lib.virginia.edu/home.html

  502. Radek says:

    Ron, in the wake of the New Zealand mosque massacre, I think it’s time Microsoft/Google or whoever is hosting your website pull the plug on Unz Review. As a site which provides platform for the most disgusting racist and anti semitic nut jobs, your site is no better than Gab which was shut down last year to save lives. Your website is no better than the worst internet hate site. Many of your contributors including those posting comments espouse such extreme views that it is obvious some of them are inches away picking a semi auto and blasting it at people of a different colour or religion.
    Please shut down your website before someone else does it for you as a result of one of your contributors including those posting comments doing something unspeakably evil with a semi auto. it is a matter of saving lives and is therefore urgent. I have written to Google and Microsoft requesting that their security staff read the contents of your website.

    • Agree: Fran Taubman
    • Disagree: geokat62, Iris
    • LOL: Wally
  503. Robjil says:
    @Radek

    The big people are the problem. The big tragedy of our time is the Seven nations to destroy for the nine eleven false flag. Destroy seven Muslim nations? Why no outcry in the “free” press that you love so much. That is the most anti- Muslim thing one could conceive. The blaming the nine eleven on Muslims is the root of Islamaphobia. Why no outcry in the “free” press you love so much about that? Muslims were the patsies. They didn’t do nine eleven. According to our “free” press, little people who do bad things are the biggest problem on our planet. Our “free” press makes the biggest stink about whatever little people do when the biggies do things a million times worst on this planet. How about a clamp down on your beloved “free” press for its endless calls for Regime Change.

    • Agree: Iris
  504. @Wally

    Perhaps determinedly obtuse best describes someone who so doggedly sticks to his “deny everything” script that he can come up with “I also challenge you to back up your description of the Germans as the “devil they knew”.”

    A moment’s reflection on commomplace language you learned no later than the age of 10 and on the fact that the prisoners were leaving with guards who, or whose commanders or colleagues had threatened focused violence on them, as in any prison, should make you see the utter gratuity of pretending there was a problem about “the devil they know”.

    As to the leaving of prisoners behind who didn’t want to go with them (the guarda) – ah you joking? You really don’t see that it supports what I was hypothesising and completely undermines your position. Clearly the guard understood that they were on the losing side and that there would be plenty of people who would seek retribution against them, whether or not justly, and that making nice with the prisoners was probably their best chance of survival unscathed.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Wally
  505. @Wally

    On your own logic Wally the scared sh*bless guards who might have received orders from some distant superior to leave and leave no evidence might have reasoned like you that the leaving behind unharmed of prisoners who couldn’t or didn’t want to leave would make people disbelieve fantastic horror stories which the guards would want to have covered up. Other likely possinilities. 1. Guards still at the camps seek orders but can’t get any clear direction from anyone with undoubred authority. 2. Apart from shooting or bayoneting them they may (no longer) have had the means to kill and it may therefore not have been practicable given the numbers and the need for the bodies to be disposed of without leaving incriminating evidence.

    • Replies: @Wally
  506. Anon[811] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    Did you get prizes at your school for being able to turn out the most words?

  507. Iris says:

    “Ron, in the wake of the New Zealand mosque massacre, I think it’s time Microsoft/Google or whoever is hosting your website pull the plug on Unz Review”

    Don’t use Muslims as an excuse. The majority of them agree with what is the main credo on this website: the Zionist supremacist ideology of domination and global control has become a danger to all of humankind.

    You are looking at the wrong “racists”.

    Muslims are continuously stigmatised for despicable terror acts committed by a tiny number of “extremist” patsies. Most of them believe that they are unfairly defamed to promote the not-so-secret Zionist political agenda. They won’t be blaming the Whites/Christians (or the UR) for what happened in NZ because they’ve been victim of this same trick many times over.

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @Grace Poole
  508. @Radek

    Tongue in cheek I detect. Because you would well know that Wally couldn’t fire a semiautomatic from his wobbling wheelchair and the rare one of the nutters who are over 70 cripples will be found to have untreated cataracts and in danger of shooting his toes off.

  509. @Wizard of Oz

    Of the typos inflicted by vindictive and insistent Autofill together with absent editing function “gratuity” should be replaced by “fatuity”.

    • Replies: @ANON
  510. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    – There were no such orders to kill those that CHOSE to remain. Why, according to Jews Wiesel & Levi, would they offer the inmates a CHOICE to remain or go with them if they had received orders to exterminate them in the first place? You’re desperately grasping.

    1. No guards were left behind at Auschwitz when the Germans left.
    What? So they could taken POW by the notorious Red Army? LOL

    – German communications to Auschwitz were in fine order when they retreated, British Bletchley Park intercepts confirm that. All German staff did received clear orders to leave, there is no doubt about that. You’re trying too hard.

    2. If your claimed body disposal may have been a problem then the Germans would not have given them the CHOICE to stay or leave, they would have forced them all to leave. Again, you’re making no sense.

    According to Zionist propaganda Himmler ordered ( there is no order) the cessation of all gassing in November, ’44, that false narrative does not say that they could not have gassed more Jews. ‘Oh what a web ….’

    What you’re experiencing is the usual cognitive dissonance that those who have been duped by discredited tales feel. No, you can’t weasel word your way out of this. The “holocaust” is truly The Big Lie.
    https://forum.codoh.com/download/file.php?id=2199&t=1

    – Healthy Jews at Auschwitz ‘liberation’:http://fcit.coedu.usf.edu/holocaust/PICS31/66935a.jpg

  511. Wally says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    said:
    “A moment’s reflection on commomplace language you learned no later than the age of 10 and on the fact that the prisoners were leaving with guards who, or whose commanders or colleagues had threatened focused violence on them, as in any prison, should make you see the utter gratuity of pretending there was a problem about “the devil they know”. ”

    So that’s why MOST by far (thousands upon thousands of Jews) CHOSE to leave with the retreating SS. LOL
    Some “devil” that was.

    See my comment #523 which further demolishes your bizarre Zionist wishful thinking.

    Why do some people want 6M Jews to be dead? Revisionists don’t. Revisionists bring them life affirming good news, 6M Jews were not murdered. Jews should be elated.

    No alleged human remains of millions to be seen in allegedly known locations, no ‘holocaust’.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  512. @Kevin Barrett

    Kevin, get off your high horse and take the plank out. Your lack of humility in your verbal diarrhea is showing. Some commenters here are stuck in the “white” mentality in the same fashion that you are stuck in the “liberal professor” mentality. Neither you nor the “skin color” crowd should be condemned. You have all taken on the labels of your oppressors.

    I heard you once state that Karl Marx had “good” ideas. I believe you uttered this nugget on Tim Kelly’s podcast. As an old academic who prides himself on research and “book smarts,” you completely missed the boat on one very key point regarding Karl. You seem oblivious to the fact that Marx was a satanist and stated so in his poetry. In ‘The Pale Maiden’ Marx writes, “I know it full well. My soul, once true to God, is chosen for hell.”

    I am not surprised at all that the liberal professor in you did not pick up on this. However, as a Muslim, you know for a fact that satanism is extremely ruinous and murderous. Marx stood for absolute humanism, which is the antithesis of the Natural Order and the metaphysical. When you, Dr. Barrett, applaud individuals like Marx while attacking satanism, you contradict yourself.

    You gravitated to Islam because your Unitarian, protestant roots caused a void left behind by your family’s abandonment of Irish-Catholic culture. This degradation in ethnicity by your family is no different than the “white” as well as “black” crowd looking for an identity after losing their ethnicity in the culture war and through weaponized migration.

    • Replies: @Grace Poole
    , @David Baker
  513. Of course they banned “The Culture of Critique.”

    It’s way too much truth in one book.

  514. @Iris

    Thank you, Iris.
    Agree.

    the Zionist supremacist ideology of domination and global control has become a danger to all of humankind.

    You use capital Z – Zionists, making it a proper noun, referring to Jews??

    The Saker uses the term, “Anglo-zionist.”

    His point seems to be to include regimes, or governments, or leaders, other than Jews.

    But Saker’s phrase seems to mean that Anglos and “zionists” follow the same “supremacist ideology.”

    I’m just playing with words, I guess.

    Your statement is pretty close to all-inclusive.
    Addition of Saker’s “Anglo-Zionist” might make it just about perfect: Many in the USA and Britain (and their suborned vassals, like Germany, France, Canada) — the Anglo-sphere — are just as afflicted with the quest for “supremacist domination” as the choosiest of the Chosenite zio-sphere.

    • Replies: @Iris
    , @Iris