The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Paul Archive
Will the Trump Administration Overdose on Authoritarianism?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Last week Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered federal prosecutors in drug cases to seek the maximum penalty authorized by federal mandatory minimum sentencing laws. Sessions’ order represents a setback to the progress made toward restoring compassion and common sense to the sentencing process over the past few years. Sessions’ action also guarantees that many nonviolent drug law offenders will continue spending more time in prison than murderers.

Sessions’ support for mandatory minimums is no surprise, as he has a history of fanatical devotion to the drug war. Sessions’ pro-drug war stance is at odds with the reality of the drug war’s failure. Over forty years after President Nixon declared war on drugs, the government cannot even keep drugs out of prisons!

As was the case with alcohol prohibition, the drug war has empowered criminal gangs and even terrorists to take advantage of the opportunity presented by prohibition to profit by meeting the continued demand for drugs. Drug prohibition enables these criminal enterprises to make profits far above the potential profits if drugs where legalized. Ironically, the so-called “law-and-order” politicians who support the drug war are helping enrich the very criminals they claim to oppose!

The war on drugs also makes street drugs more lethal by incentivizing the creation of more potent and, thus, more dangerous drugs. Of course, even as Sessions himself admits, the war on drugs also leads to increased violence, as drug dealers cannot go to the courts to settle disputes among themselves or with their customers.

Before 9/11, the war on drugs was the go-to excuse used to justify new infringements on liberty. For example, laws limiting our ability to withdraw, or even carry, large sums of cash and laws authorizing civil asset forfeiture were justified by the need to crack down on drug dealers and users. The war on drugs is also the root cause of the criminal justice system’s disparate treatment of minorities and the militarization of local police.

The war on drugs is a war on the Constitution as well. The Constitution does not give the federal government authority to regulate, much less ban, drugs. People who doubt this should ask themselves why it was necessary to amend the Constitution to allow the federal government to criminalize drinking alcohol but not necessary to amend the Constitution to criminalize drug use.

Today, a majority of states have legalized medical marijuana, and a growing number are legalizing recreational marijuana use. Enforcement of federal laws outlawing marijuana in those states is the type of federal interference with state laws that conservatives usually oppose. Hopefully, in this area the Trump administration will exercise restraint and respect state marijuana laws.

Sessions’ announcement was not the only pro-drug war announcement made by the administration this week. President Trump himself, in a meeting with the president of Columbia, promised to continue US intervention in South and Central America to eliminate drug cartels. President Trump, like his attorney general, seems to not understand that the rise of foreign drug cartels, like the rise of domestic drug gangs, is a consequence of US drug policy.

The use of government force to stop adults from putting certain substances into their bodies — whether marijuana, saturated fats, or raw milk — violates the nonaggression principle that is the bedrock of a free society. Therefore, all those who care about protecting individual liberty and limiting government power should support ending the drug war. Those with moral objections to drug use should realize that education and persuasion, carried out through voluntary institutions like churches and schools, is a more moral and effective way to discourage drug use than relying on government force.

(Republished from The Ron Paul Institute by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Donald Trump, Drug Laws 
Hide 4 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. MarkinLA says:

    but not necessary to amend the Constitution to criminalize drug use.

    Well they used the same scam they did to outlaw automatic weapons – they created a taxing scheme and “regulated” them. The same as they want to do to all our freedoms eventually.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /rpaul/will-the-trump-administration-overdose-on-authoritarianism/#comment-1881429
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. CalDre says:

    There are two “reasons” for the war on drugs, which dovetail with the two primary beneficiaries of the war on drugs:

    1) The deep state (CIA, etc.) who can transport the drugs across borders with impunity and reap massive profits from their distribution, without any accountability for the money spent; and

    2) The big banks who launder the money at tremendous profit to themselves.

    It has nothing to do with stopping drugs, it has everything to do with creating a monopoly for the deep state and a booming business for the banksters.

    It is no coincidence that Afghanistan was invaded a few years after the Talban eradicated poppy production, and that Afghanistan now produces record amounts of opium pushed on our streets as heroine. The CIA and banksters are laughing all the way to the bank.

    Read More
    • Replies: @hyperbola
    The ironic part is that it is exactly the same sects/banks that have always been involved in heroin. They have been protected by "our" governments for centuries.

    The Jewish Opium Trade and Britain
    http://satyricon20.tripod.com/sat33-Sassoon.htm

    Controller Houses Of The East India Company: EIC Series Part IV
    http://greatgameindia.com/controller-houses-east-india-company-eic-series-part-iv/

    HSBC, too big to jail, is the new poster child for US two-tiered justice system
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/12/hsbc-prosecution-fine-money-laundering

    The sect is more than happy to kill Americans for their "business".

    The Real Afghanistan Surge is in Heroin Production and Tripled Opium Cultivation since the US military arrived/ UN and US Government documents
    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/09/the-real-afghanistan-surge-is-in-heroin-production-and-tripled-opium-cultivation-since-the-us-military-arrived-un-and-us-government-documents.html
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  3. hyperbola says:
    @CalDre
    There are two "reasons" for the war on drugs, which dovetail with the two primary beneficiaries of the war on drugs:

    1) The deep state (CIA, etc.) who can transport the drugs across borders with impunity and reap massive profits from their distribution, without any accountability for the money spent; and

    2) The big banks who launder the money at tremendous profit to themselves.

    It has nothing to do with stopping drugs, it has everything to do with creating a monopoly for the deep state and a booming business for the banksters.

    It is no coincidence that Afghanistan was invaded a few years after the Talban eradicated poppy production, and that Afghanistan now produces record amounts of opium pushed on our streets as heroine. The CIA and banksters are laughing all the way to the bank.

    The ironic part is that it is exactly the same sects/banks that have always been involved in heroin. They have been protected by “our” governments for centuries.

    The Jewish Opium Trade and Britain

    http://satyricon20.tripod.com/sat33-Sassoon.htm

    Controller Houses Of The East India Company: EIC Series Part IV

    http://greatgameindia.com/controller-houses-east-india-company-eic-series-part-iv/

    HSBC, too big to jail, is the new poster child for US two-tiered justice system

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/12/hsbc-prosecution-fine-money-laundering

    The sect is more than happy to kill Americans for their “business”.

    The Real Afghanistan Surge is in Heroin Production and Tripled Opium Cultivation since the US military arrived/ UN and US Government documents

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/09/the-real-afghanistan-surge-is-in-heroin-production-and-tripled-opium-cultivation-since-the-us-military-arrived-un-and-us-government-documents.html

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  4. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/turkey-condemns-us-over-aggressive-acts-against-its-bodyguards-in-dc-during-president-erdogans-visit-in-washington/2017/05/22/05133db6-3ef4-11e7-b29f-f40ffced2ddb_story.html

    It will take a lot to catch up with Erdogan authoritarianism – his bodyguards are quite capable of exporting their attitudes to domestic protest to foreign countries.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Paul Comments via RSS