The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Ron Paul ArchiveBlogview
The Federal Reserve Is, and Always Has Been, Politicized
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Audit the Fed recently took a step closer to becoming law, when it was favorably reported by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. This means the House could vote on the bill at any time. The bill passed by voice vote without any objections, although Fed defenders did launch hysterical attacks on the bill during the debate as well as at a hearing on the bill the previous week.

One representative claimed that auditing the Fed would result in rising interest rates, a stock market crash, a decline in the dollar’s value, and a complete loss of confidence in the US economy. Those who understand economics know that all of this is actually what awaits America unless we change our monetary policy. Passing the audit bill is the vital first step in that process, since an audit can provide Congress a road map to changing the fiat currency system.

Another charge leveled by the Fed’s defenders is that subjecting the Fed to an audit would make the Fed subject to political pressure. There are two problems with this argument. First, nothing in the audit bill gives Congress or the president any new authority to interfere in the Federal Reserve’s operations. Second, and most importantly, the Federal Reserve has a long history of giving in to presidential pressure for an “accommodative” monetary policy.

The most notorious example of Fed chairmen tailoring monetary policy to fit the demands of a president is Nixon-era Federal Reserve Chair Arthur Burns. Burns and Nixon may be an extreme example — after all no other president was caught on tape joking with the Fed chair about Fed independence, but every president has tried to influence the Fed with varying degrees of success. For instance, Lyndon Johnson summoned the Fed chair to the White House to berate him for not tailoring monetary policy to support Johnson’s guns and butter policies.

Federal Reserve chairmen have also used their power to shape presidential economic policy. According to Maestro, Bob Woodward’s biography of Alan Greenspan, Bill Clinton once told Al Gore that Greenspan was a “man we can deal with,” while Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen claimed the Clinton administration and Greenspan’s Fed had a “gentleman’s agreement” regarding the Fed’s support for the administration’s economic policies.

The Federal Reserve has also worked to influence the legislative branch. In the 1970s, the Fed organized a campaign by major banks and financial institutions to defeat a prior audit bill. The banks and other institutions who worked to keep the Fed’s operations a secret are not only under the Fed’s regulatory jurisdiction, but are some of the major beneficiaries of the current monetary system.

There can be no doubt that, as the audit bill advances through the legislative process, the Fed and its allies will ramp up both public and behind-the-scenes efforts to kill the bill. Can anyone dismiss the possibility that Janet Yellen will attempt to “persuade” Donald Trump to drop his support for Audit the Fed in exchange for an “accommodative” monetary policy that supports the administration’s proposed spending on overseas militarism and domestic infrastructure?

While auditing the Fed is supported by the vast majority of Americans, it is opposed by powerful members of the financial elite and the deep state. Therefore, those of us seeking to change our national monetary policy must redouble our efforts to force Congress to put America on a path to liberty, peace, and prosperity by auditing, then ending, the Fed.

(Republished from The Ron Paul Institute by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Economics • Tags: Federal Reserve 
    []
  1. I don’t understand why anyone thinks the Fed engages in criminal activity, and that Ron Paul’s sort of audit will get the goods on the perpetrators. What if the audit’s findings don’t support Paul’s interpretation of the Fed’s operations? Indeed, what if the audit shows that the Fed generally complies with the law?

    Read More
    • Replies: @jtgw
    I think the main problem is that the Fed creates new money but we don't know who is getting the money. Also, the moral objection to the Fed is the same as the objection to any bank that operates on fractional-reserve lending: it is legalized counterfeiting, which is legalized fraud. If you tried to pay your debts by just adding numbers to your bank balance, you would be rightly punished, but somehow this behavior is OK when a central bank does it.
    , @Daniel H
    >>I don’t understand why anyone thinks the Fed engages in criminal activity, and that Ron Paul’s sort of audit will get the goods on the perpetrators. What if the audit’s findings don’t support Paul’s interpretation of the Fed’s operations? Indeed, what if the audit shows that the Fed generally complies with the law?<<

    If you and other Fed defenders have such confidence then why do you fear and resist and audit? If anything you should welcome and audit so you can say, "See, we told you so. All clean over here."
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /rpaul/the-federal-reserve-is-and-always-has-been-politicized/#comment-1840176
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. jtgw says:
    @advancedatheist
    I don't understand why anyone thinks the Fed engages in criminal activity, and that Ron Paul's sort of audit will get the goods on the perpetrators. What if the audit's findings don't support Paul's interpretation of the Fed's operations? Indeed, what if the audit shows that the Fed generally complies with the law?

    I think the main problem is that the Fed creates new money but we don’t know who is getting the money. Also, the moral objection to the Fed is the same as the objection to any bank that operates on fractional-reserve lending: it is legalized counterfeiting, which is legalized fraud. If you tried to pay your debts by just adding numbers to your bank balance, you would be rightly punished, but somehow this behavior is OK when a central bank does it.

    Read More
  3. Daniel H says:
    @advancedatheist
    I don't understand why anyone thinks the Fed engages in criminal activity, and that Ron Paul's sort of audit will get the goods on the perpetrators. What if the audit's findings don't support Paul's interpretation of the Fed's operations? Indeed, what if the audit shows that the Fed generally complies with the law?

    >>I don’t understand why anyone thinks the Fed engages in criminal activity, and that Ron Paul’s sort of audit will get the goods on the perpetrators. What if the audit’s findings don’t support Paul’s interpretation of the Fed’s operations? Indeed, what if the audit shows that the Fed generally complies with the law?<<

    If you and other Fed defenders have such confidence then why do you fear and resist and audit? If anything you should welcome and audit so you can say, "See, we told you so. All clean over here."

    Read More
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Paul Comments via RSS