The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewRon Paul Archive
Are We A Nation of Wimps?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

We now live in a society where safety and security are to be sought at all costs. The sacrifice of liberty is not a concern for most Americans today. This is not something new and it has been characteristic of most people throughout history but it has gotten especially bad in America since 9/11. In addition many Americans have become deeply worried as a consequence of the economic crisis that started in 2008. They have lost confidence in their future financial security but continue to deny our nation’s bankruptcy.

This has prompted many to opt for dependency on government even if it requires the use of force to get what they want to ameliorate their fears. Rather than having confidence in the benefits that accrue from a free society, the majority of Americans are now frightened by the thought of self-reliance and accepting the responsibility that comes with liberty.

There has been a steady erosion of confidence over the past 100 years as the American people as a whole have accepted the so-called need for big government to provide safety and security for its citizens. In the process they have readily accepted the personal income tax and the abuse of the IRS along with the illegal power of the money manipulators at the Federal Reserve to pay the bills by simply printing money. Unfortunately they have also convinced themselves of our “righteousness” by supporting force to spread American “greatness” throughout the world. This of course is a fantasy and is self-deceptive. This trend has been ongoing since the Woodrow Wilson era up to and including the policies designed by the current crop of neoconservatives.

It’s a sense of insecurity that prompts the need to demonstrate strength and confidence in an artificial manner. In a way it’s “a little man syndrome” to compensate for our diminishing achievements in our domestic economy and our position in world affairs. This includes the “chicken Hawks” as well as those who participate in aggressive behavior both domestically and internationally.

Many get a sense of strength and a feeling of patriotism from being able to bomb and kill individuals 6,000 miles away from our home though they have never committed an aggressive act against us. Our policies are designed to search for enemies to destroy though they pose no threat to us. We use remotely controlled drones and cruise missiles to perpetuate a sense of power even against powerless Third World pseudo-enemies.

We never hesitate to put on sanctions to punish those who do not obey our wishes, causing suffering, including death, to millions of innocent people. It is common now for us to pursue these policies around the world with the use of surrogates and training of other people. Because Americans, though they want to be powerful and in control, do not want to see any more Americans killed. In spite of the need for heroic militarism, Americans are getting tired of proving to the world that we are not a nation of wimps.

They have been convinced that we can be the strongest nation in the world, maintain an empire, and contract out the dirty work. And they seem surprised that it’s not working very well. It is now necessary for us to make snipers our super-heroes. Matter of fact every member of the military is now a hero, “risking his life” defending freedom and the Constitution, and deserving constant public displays of gratitude and special recognition. This pretense occurs while neglecting the veterans whose lives have been ruined by the senseless wars.

Denial is epidemic as to what should be done to address the problem of misplaced militarism being used to compensate for a deep-seated fear of inadequacy. Just killing imaginary enemies doesn’t make us strong and confident. The danger is that this morally confusing policy can destroy the soul of a nation.

We must remember that insecurity and fear provide fodder for authoritarians. And they are only too willing to oblige and fill the needs of the weak to feel better about themselves by engaging in the patriotic defense of our country, even if the threats are manufactured by the propagandists. The tragic part of all this is that it’s all done at the expense of liberty since loss of liberty was the major source of the problem in the first place.

Although the wimpiness of the American citizenry has been developing for quite a while, on 9/11 nineteen individuals brought America to her knees. This was principally due to the lack of understanding of exactly why 9/11 occurred — and to the successful efforts of our government to perpetuate a fraudulent explanation that those who want to kill us are doing so only because they are angry with us due to our freedoms and our prosperity. We are constantly being frightened of some unknown potential enemy lurking around the corner ready to attack and destroy us at any moment.

The Bush doctrine of preemptive war, which is nothing more than aggression, was met with essentially no resistance from the American people and very little from politicians. This idea of presidents being able to go to war recklessly and ask questions later possibly satisfies those who claim this serves the interest of our national security, but it’s a reflection of a sense of insecurity and contributes to the persistent attitude that we have a great need for Empire to make us safe and free. Nothing could be further from the truth

The ones who suffer most from this policy are those who pay and die without questioning, who actually lack courage and wisdom to resist the forces that push for war that serve the special interests. These special interests include: the political demagogues, financial beneficiaries, the military-industrial complex, proponents of the “sphere of influence argument,” money and power and false patriotism which are all promoted by government lies designed to perpetrate fear to a gullible public suffering from chronic wimpiness.

Support for these policies come from the many who succumb to the propaganda. Complacency is also a major contributing factor as people become more and more dependent as long as they believe the government will deliver safety and security. The wimps want to believe these false promises in spite of the evidence of their failure and the true costs. But that may be about to change. Liberty is not thought much about as long as benefits come in spite of the increasing concern for the solvency of the country. This attitude can change quickly when the dollar takes a big hit

The majority of Americans are deeply worried that a foreign enemy is at our doorstep. The Al Qaeda could hit us any day and is out to get us in any country in which we find ourselves. Meanwhile it appears that ISIS is winning all the wars.

People have to be convinced that a potential Hitler is about to attack us at any time even without any evidence that it’s likely to happen. During the 20th century hundreds of millions of people were killed by the Communists and Fascists, yet the size and scope of today’s dangers are miniscule in comparison. Blinded by the propaganda, the wimps refuse to see how the enemy, which is real to some degree, is made stronger by our inciting hatred by our occupations, and foolishly getting ourselves involved in civil wars in the many countries of the Middle East.

The evidence is overwhelming that our efforts in the Middle East are the best recruiting tool for the jihadist radicals to recruit supporters willing to wage guerrilla war against us. The process has led us to spend hundreds of billions of dollars with the results being that our enemies grow stronger as they end up using our weapons against us. The current foreign policy has been an absolute failure in achieving any positive results and it certainly hasn’t removed the need and desire for the American people to feel victorious on the battlefield to compensate for their sense of inferiority and insecurity.

Economic dependency is every bit as bad as the need for the American people to have military victories to feed their egos. This is initiated quite frequently by the politicians seeking votes and anxious to get people dependent on them so that they can serve as their rescuers. Bad economies, essentially caused by bad economic planning by our government and the Federal Reserve, breeds dependency. It also contributes to wealth inequality, and tragically the blame is placed on free markets and liberty as the cause rather than understanding how the problems are created by the government and its economic policies. The worse the problems get the louder the demands become for “fairness” in the redistribution of goods which of course have to be first stolen from one group to give to another.

This attitude breeds discontent and contributes significantly to the turmoil in our inner cities as the contest between those demanding entitlements are pitched against the militarized police. The militarization of the police of recent years contributes significantly to the problem which prompts those who are dependent to lobby the politicians to fight for their share of the wealth while at the same time the economic pie is shrinking. Rarely is there ever a demand for independence, self-reliance, and free markets — instead it’s for more welfare redistribution for which the recipients believe they are entitled and have a right to. Of course all of this contributes to further wimpiness of our society.

Sociopaths, those without scruples, appear tough but this only compensates for their own inadequacies and fear. They believe the military can provide “the manliness” they seek. They’re convinced they are showing strength and superiority over others yet the real problem is their own lack of confidence. The more inadequate they feel, greater is the need for aggression to prove their toughness. This is especially troublesome since our leaders are incapable of expressing regret or a wiliness to reconsider the policies that have caused so much harm. Without a conscience, they never suffer from PTSD.

This requires that they ridicule, badger and discredit anyone with enough self-confidence and self-esteem that does not require artificial “strength” achieved by bullying weaker nations or individuals by hiding behind the authoritarian force provided by government. It is this insecurity that drives the neoconservatives to depend on war for their sense of satisfaction. Actually they are wimps and afraid of their own shadow. They believe Al Qaeda exists under our bed and we’re about to be invaded. At least this is what they want the people to believe so they can pursue their bold militarism for their own psychological and special interest needs.

Since these are all false and unnecessary justifications for war, success is rare. Since World War II the wars have been essentially lost. Now bands of renegades are achieving military victories every place we go to promote regime change to teach people in faraway lands to adhere to democratic elections following our rules. If the candidate we support doesn’t win, no problem, we can then simply throw our support behind the next “regime change.”

Too often our fighting and spending money help our enemies and never serve our national security. It’s easy to frighten the people by stories of the attacks by ISIS yet they never mention countries like Saudi Arabia which practice sharia law and are not bashful about beheading citizens for even social and religious reasons. The fear and insecurity many Americans feel is encouraged by individuals seeking power and money.

The only answer to this is for the people to stand up to the truth that the real wimps are the ones who hide behind militarism and initiate needless wars. Confidence and strength of character to challenge forced redistribution of wealth is also necessary. An answer can be found in promoting the cause of liberty. The people unfortunately have been conditioned to believe that government violence both economic and military is a “tool” that serves the people. The job of the propagandists, for which there are many, is to convince the people that it’s all done for the purpose of helping them.

Unfortunately dependency destroys the soul, as well as the soul of a nation, by eliminating the satisfaction one gets from producing freely as an individual and assuming responsibility for oneself. And as this lack of self-confidence grows, so does the dependency on the state. Those who seek more government help to alleviate their sense of weakness and fear, conclude that it’s all the government’s fault for failing to provide society with enough security. Seeking more liberty is rarely seen as the answer to the people’s frustrations. Instead this produces a sense of victimization that results in demanding that government do more for those dependent who eagerly grant more power to the authoritarians.

Throughout history there have always been opportunities for the authoritarians to run roughshod over the people. A nation of wimps, dependent on the government for safety and security, opens the doors for the authoritarians who delight in satisfying their needs by controlling others and falsely believing in their own strength and wisdom. Soldiers fighting wars and bureaucrats passing out welfare are emboldened by a sense of satisfaction that they are serving a special purpose by providing the strength that the weak and helpless lack.

The problem is that these efforts are never helpful in dealing with the dependency of the weak. By accommodating the needy, who are all looking in the wrong places for satisfaction, the dependency only gets worse. The solution can only come from understanding the significance of practicing self-reliance. This cannot come from government. If it does not come from within us, it will only lead to frustration and a greater desire to foolishly give up more liberty for safety and security. Those who are dependent will continue to seek security in the entitlement system and “strength” from a national endorsement of the warrior state.

The politicians are well attuned to the desires of those whose weakness encourages them to become dependent on government largesse. Polling is key to the politician’s success in responding to the demands and expectations of those who are no longer self-reliant.

Everyone is aware that a thug with a gun used to satisfy his personal needs or demands is a criminal. Politicians and armies in a dependent society, who use guns to wage war and forcibly redistribute wealth at will, are “criminals” as well. This is not only true for many of the poor who have become dependent. Business interests, especially in the midst of a crisis, are always looking to the government for favors with financial bailouts, targeted regulations, special contracts as we see in the military-industrial complex, and in the many benefits banks get from our monetary system.

A predictable consequence of Keynesian economic policy is the development of structural poverty which affects even those desirous of independence and self-reliance but are more or less forced to listen to the promises of the politicians who claim they have an answer for their needs. All political factions are anxious to take care of the people but they do nothing more than create more dependency and a poorer nation.

It seems at this time that the task is overwhelming because more people become dependent on the state and as they do they become more fearful of the future. The only solution for this is to get the people to understand the principles of liberty and the positive results thereof. This cannot work unless we reinstitute the work ethic instead of allowing the lobbyists and big money to run the system.

The solution has to be found in peaceful resistance to the policies of government benevolence, which were supposed to solve our problems. Dependency on government force in redistribution of wealth and militarism around the world as a source of strength has to end. The people have to come to realize that real strength comes from resisting the status quo that preaches the doctrine of a command society, and to recognize that insecurity drives many Americans to support wars that are expensive and futile.

Depending on militarism and promotion of Empire to compensate for weakness and dependency is not an answer. We must raise up a generation of individuals who are not frightened and embarrassed to support the natural instinct for peace, love, and friendship. Wars do little to provide strength of character for individuals who do not understand why we’re in the mess that we find ourselves today. Not only should we insist that the government not lie to us, we should stop lying to ourselves as well. This means that there should be no more glorification of war and using the military personnel as a source of our confidence and strength. This can only come by living in a free society

Summary:

The prevailing attitude of the American people today reflects weakness, fearfulness, and dependency. In general, confidence and self-reliance has been lost.

Government failure, false promises, bad economic policy has contributed greatly to this condition. Human nature also is a major contributor to this sense of hopelessness. It is not unnatural to accept unearned benefits when trouble begins. We as a nation have grown to believe that government redistribution of wealth, through force, is a right and an entitlement. Sadly, hard work, savings, production, sound economy, and honest money are of little interest to most Americans.

True sense of worth can only come from productive effort. When people become overly dependent on government redistribution of wealth, true happiness and satisfaction is difficult, if not impossible, to achieve. There is little personal satisfaction when individuals become addicted to government “benefits” which actually worsen the conditions and increase the fear that the future does not bode well for us. This only provides the incentive and the need to expand the welfare/warfare state

The cycle, once it has started, sets the stage for the continued erosion of liberty and in spite of the fact that the people become unhappy, poor and angry, they blame government for not doing enough to take care of them. Under these conditions the demagogues in and out of government thrive. The social and economic philosophers, politicians, power seekers, and powerful special interests all step forth with solutions that only serve their interests and not the interests of the people who are on the receiving end of bad policy. It is their use of the “wimps” to enhance their agenda that becomes a full-time job in Washington. The weak are conditioned to believe the lies and promises about both domestic and international affairs. Only individual liberty and the principles of a Republic offer us any hope.

Is the American dream dead? Once it was characteristic of most Americans to believe in the American dream. That meant there was a strong conviction that everyone had an equal opportunity to achieve any goal they sought with hard work and effort. They believed in the work ethic and that determination would ultimately pay off. Achieving the American dream was thought to be a result of hard work.

Today there are still a lot of people who believe in the American dream but too often they are individuals who have recently left countries much poorer than ours and are hopeful that with hard work and effort they too can have a better life for themselves here. It is proven by many who come to this country — both illegal and legal — that they bring with them a work ethic that has become difficult to find in Americans who have become dependent on the “the American dream” being delivered to them by government action and corporate favoritism.

Many Americans have come to the conclusion that hard work and effort is no longer rewarded due to the many obstacles put in their way by an overly intrusive government. And it is for this reason that the numbers are growing of those individuals anxious to expatriate and go to other countries where they believe that their work and effort will not be diminished as they are in our country today.

The majority of the American people unfortunately have accepted the idea that it is necessary to be aggressive and dependent and driven by fearfulness to survive in a political-economic culture that rewards political action and lobbying for success rather than being rewarded for hard work and effort. Because of this, most policies in Washington are designed to accommodate this culture. Even though government policy has been the main contributor to the problems we face and the destruction of the American dream, the majority is still supporting the idea that more activism by the government to intervene in our lives and in the economy is the solution.

Welfare demands drive a lot of politicians to continuously redistribute wealth out of a desire for fairness with a policy that does the opposite. The zeal for patriotism and for the support of America’s greatness makes the electorate overly anxious and willing to support militarism which has done such great harm to us as a nation and to our moral character.

Even though the majority of the American people reflect a philosophy of the past hundred years that promoted dependency and foreign entanglements, a large number of citizens are now recognizing that it has been a failed policy. However difficult this may be to overcome, it does not mean that our policies can’t be reversed. More accurately we’re probably in a transition period, and even though many are frightened by change, support for a philosophy based on liberty and peace is gaining in acceptance.

There are signs on the horizon that the American people are awakening and once again are beginning to understand what the American dream was all about and how our politicians and our culture of dependency has led us astray. The intellectuals of the past century were very supportive of these views that gave credibility to both the domestic welfare programs as well as the international intervention that has given us so many needless and wasteful wars.

The good news is that the intellectual framework that is now developing in our society is advocating a different sentiment for the American people. One day if enacted it will reignite the idea of self-reliance and emphasize that by hard work people can get ahead and do better economically rather than by depending on a government that has driven us into bankruptcy. Hardly has the educational system been enhanced by $1.3 trillion in student debt which is now currently being defaulted on — all we have to show for it is a large number of graduates not well trained and without jobs available.

Something different is required than depending on government controlled education. Thankfully it’s available in the growing interest in home and private schooling. The Internet provides the vehicle for spreading the answer to the mess created by the authoritarian’s false promises to provide safety and security by sacrificing liberty.

The good news is that we’re well on our way to raising up a new generation that understands the dangers and the limits on the system that we have today and are anxious to promote and support the ideas of liberty. That is where the answers will be found.

(Republished from The Ron Paul Institute by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 23 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. D. K. says:

    Judging by your own “chip off of the old block” who is dreaming of the White House, in 2017 et seq., I quess that the question pretty much answers itself!?!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /rpaul/are-we-a-nation-of-wimps/#comment-945757
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Allow me to add that Dr. Paul was a U.S. Air Force officer for five years. He is too classy to toss in that extraneous info. Here are two old G2mil blog postings about him:

    Jan 21, 2012 – Did Ron Paul Win Iowa?

    A forbidden topic in our corporate media is vote fraud, or even suggesting that something is amiss. We all know that Mitt Romney won Iowa, unless you noticed a small article a few days later that the Iowa race is “unresolved” with details further down that Santorum probably won. It is possible that “unelectable” Ron Paul won, but we’ll never know, because votes from eight precincts are missing! Missing? Iowa vote counters had to “hunt down” the results from dozens of precincts, and found the results for 134 precincts had errors which “they” corrected. Is the Republican party in Iowa run by fools, or mobsters? After the hundreds of hours of corporate media coverage of the Iowa campaign, you might think our media would find that an interesting story to pursue. Where is the FBI investigation?

    Mar 2, 2012 – More Vote Fraud

    For another example of blatant voter manipulation by our corporate media, read this. It seems that Mitt Romney did not narrowly win the Maine primary as widely reported. When the vote tallies were announced, votes from several counties were missing. After complaints, they were counted, but the Republican guy in charge said that he would not release the results until March 10, because people were upset. Everyone suspects Ron Paul won, but he is not permitted to win any state, at least not until March 6 (super Tuesday) when Mitt Romney secures the nomination.

    __________________

    It was eventually announced that Paul easily won Maine.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. Crassus [AKA "Ergot"] says: • Website

    “….we’re well on our way to raising up a new generation that understands the dangers and the limits on the system that we have today….”

    The increasing chilling effect of government surveillance dampens my optimism about this. I suggest that there should be better options for would-be leakers and whistleblowers: http://worldcrass.com/2015/05/03/selling-government-secrets/

    Otherwise, many who are in the know will be afraid to teach the new generation about the threats to privacy.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Art says:

    God bless Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul. Of course Ron is 100% correct in this speech. But it does not tell the whole truth – he left out the “J” word, the “Z” word, and the “I” word.

    Nothing good will happen until those words are spoken – period.

    Only then will America be able to shake off our downward spiral.

    End of story.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  5. Dr Paul (I’m sorry to report) failed the ‘wimpy’ litmus test when he stated:

    on 9/11 nineteen individuals brought America to her knees

    If he’s going to recover his gonads, he’s going to have to stand up and admit this was never in fact the case:

    If you can wrap your head around the fact over 2,200 certified architects & engineers have directly disputed the official report on 9/11, that’s a good start. Now, consider what happened to a 47 story steel & concrete modern structure on the afternoon of 9/11.

    No plane hit Building 7, only minor debris.

    Building 7 is the only modern steel structure in the world purportedly brought down by minor fire, compared to other steel structures surviving much larger & more intense fires.

    Read more at:

    http://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/12/1617/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  6. Blobby5 says:

    Wonderful, brillant man! Glad to see him on Unz.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. Ron Paul says a lot of good, smart things. However, he is a liberal when it comes to civil rights and immigration. You can’t say you’re against our foreign policy insanity when you simultaneously import the same pathologies into the nation. We end up weakening ourselves by breaking down our core identity. Historically, that has only led to catastrophic war and break-up. On that road will lie government tyranny of all sorts.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Flower says:

    What are the chances of a bill in Congress being passed into law? Our “democratic” govt tells us that the majority wins; therefore, under our prevailing theory, the more people who want a particular law would mean that bill has a better chance of being passed than a bill that nobody wants. But that’s not the way it is. According to researchers, a bill in Congress, any bill in Congress, stands a 30% chance of being passed. It doesn’t matter how many are for or against a particular bill, the chances of it being passed is a flat 30%.

    Think back to the Wall Street welfare act that gave upwards of 2 TRILLION dollars to the banks to cover their gambling debts. When that bill came up for a vote, the number of Americans calling, emailing, telegraphing Congress to NOT pass the law was so great that it actually broke the comm system of the US Congress. It was reported that the American public was 80% AGAINST giving money to the banks. But what happened?

    So what’s the point, Ron? Are you suggesting that we march in the streets every time we disagree with Congress? That’s all we’d be doing. The silly reply that we need to notify our congressional representative has been proven to be a joke. If I email my rep every hour on the hour, the chances are 30% it will make any difference. If I don’t ever call the slimeball that purportedly “represents” me, the chances are still 30%.

    Ron Paul, your article seems to indicate that you have finally woken up to the reality that the rest of us see and deal with every efing day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    I think you got that wrong. The chance of a bill the public wants is less than 30%. However, if the donor class wants it the odds go up to 99.999%
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  9. annamaria says:

    Key words:
    1. Plutocracy
    2. Empire of Federal Reserve

    There are no political instruments to stand against the juggernaut of money&power that make the war and peace decisions.

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/04/01/plutocracy-in-america/

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Renoman says:

    I think the word you’re looking for is Pussy’s and yes the plague has hit. Bunch of whiny Women and weasel Lawyers strangling any sort of testosterone out of existence. This will end badly.

    Read More
    • Replies: @annamaria
    Poor bankers. Poor warriors. These whiny women have been destroying the perfect world of the Vampire Squid and Military Industrial Complex. The innocent and defenseless Empire of Federal Reserve (guarded by the mega-war profiteering corporations) needs urgently to protect itself from the whiny females and weasel lawyers (with the exception of the brave Jay Bybee and John Yoo).
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  11. MarkinLA says:
    @Flower
    What are the chances of a bill in Congress being passed into law? Our "democratic" govt tells us that the majority wins; therefore, under our prevailing theory, the more people who want a particular law would mean that bill has a better chance of being passed than a bill that nobody wants. But that's not the way it is. According to researchers, a bill in Congress, any bill in Congress, stands a 30% chance of being passed. It doesn't matter how many are for or against a particular bill, the chances of it being passed is a flat 30%.

    Think back to the Wall Street welfare act that gave upwards of 2 TRILLION dollars to the banks to cover their gambling debts. When that bill came up for a vote, the number of Americans calling, emailing, telegraphing Congress to NOT pass the law was so great that it actually broke the comm system of the US Congress. It was reported that the American public was 80% AGAINST giving money to the banks. But what happened?

    So what's the point, Ron? Are you suggesting that we march in the streets every time we disagree with Congress? That's all we'd be doing. The silly reply that we need to notify our congressional representative has been proven to be a joke. If I email my rep every hour on the hour, the chances are 30% it will make any difference. If I don't ever call the slimeball that purportedly "represents" me, the chances are still 30%.

    Ron Paul, your article seems to indicate that you have finally woken up to the reality that the rest of us see and deal with every efing day.

    I think you got that wrong. The chance of a bill the public wants is less than 30%. However, if the donor class wants it the odds go up to 99.999%

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  12. MarkinLA says:

    It also contributes to wealth inequality, and tragically the blame is placed on free markets and liberty as the cause rather than understanding how the problems are created by the government and its economic policies.

    I don’t know anybody who attributes it to “liberty” but free trade and free markets sure as hell do contribute. The natural tendency is for people to collude to make their lives easier. The in-group does whatever it can to extract as much as it can with as little effort as possible from the out-group. The idea that more “freedom” is the counterbalance to this tendency is ridiculous and only something your read about among big L libertarian nitwits (especially after they’ve had their bong hits).

    Why is it that every time more freedom is given to people in the financial markets, a bubble and bust soon occur? Carter and Reagan gave the thrifts more freedom and they destroyed themselves on a orgy of commercial real estate lending and junk bonds. We just saw what the end of Glass-Steagal did. Of course, the libertarian answer is “we didn’t give them enough freedom” or the old standby – some evil government program or person somehow threw a monkey wrench into the whole beautiful thing.

    I voted and supported Paul with the maximum donations at the time because he was by far better than the other turds but his big L libertarianism is something I have an issue with.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Drapetomaniac
    If you think of government as a weapon version of a multi-tool, used by those in control to their benefit, on the masses to their detriment, and able to evolve new weapons through new laws, you will understand why everything government touches turns to crap.

    But not for those able to use the multi-tool.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. annamaria says:
    @Renoman
    I think the word you're looking for is Pussy's and yes the plague has hit. Bunch of whiny Women and weasel Lawyers strangling any sort of testosterone out of existence. This will end badly.

    Poor bankers. Poor warriors. These whiny women have been destroying the perfect world of the Vampire Squid and Military Industrial Complex. The innocent and defenseless Empire of Federal Reserve (guarded by the mega-war profiteering corporations) needs urgently to protect itself from the whiny females and weasel lawyers (with the exception of the brave Jay Bybee and John Yoo).

    Read More
    • Replies: @Renoman
    Good one!
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Renoman says:
    @annamaria
    Poor bankers. Poor warriors. These whiny women have been destroying the perfect world of the Vampire Squid and Military Industrial Complex. The innocent and defenseless Empire of Federal Reserve (guarded by the mega-war profiteering corporations) needs urgently to protect itself from the whiny females and weasel lawyers (with the exception of the brave Jay Bybee and John Yoo).

    Good one!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. @MarkinLA
    It also contributes to wealth inequality, and tragically the blame is placed on free markets and liberty as the cause rather than understanding how the problems are created by the government and its economic policies.

    I don't know anybody who attributes it to "liberty" but free trade and free markets sure as hell do contribute. The natural tendency is for people to collude to make their lives easier. The in-group does whatever it can to extract as much as it can with as little effort as possible from the out-group. The idea that more "freedom" is the counterbalance to this tendency is ridiculous and only something your read about among big L libertarian nitwits (especially after they've had their bong hits).

    Why is it that every time more freedom is given to people in the financial markets, a bubble and bust soon occur? Carter and Reagan gave the thrifts more freedom and they destroyed themselves on a orgy of commercial real estate lending and junk bonds. We just saw what the end of Glass-Steagal did. Of course, the libertarian answer is "we didn't give them enough freedom" or the old standby - some evil government program or person somehow threw a monkey wrench into the whole beautiful thing.

    I voted and supported Paul with the maximum donations at the time because he was by far better than the other turds but his big L libertarianism is something I have an issue with.

    If you think of government as a weapon version of a multi-tool, used by those in control to their benefit, on the masses to their detriment, and able to evolve new weapons through new laws, you will understand why everything government touches turns to crap.

    But not for those able to use the multi-tool.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  16. […] This has prompted many to opt for dependency on government even if it requires the use of force to get what they want to ameliorate their fears.  Read the entire story. […]

    Read More
  17. tangent to the topic –

    C Span is framing the issue of Jade Helm exercise in a way crafted to assure Americans that they are not the target of the US military.

    I think there’s a larger question: nearly 40 years ago a US military contractor working on behalf of Shah Reza Pahlavi conducted exercises over the same terrain that is involved in Jade Helm.

    That region, specifically, around Los Alamos, New Mexico (“uncertain, likely hostile” in the JH exercise) was selected because it closely resembles terrain in the desert in Iran which the engineers thought would be most favorable for a radar installation.

    I’m not as worried about US military plans to target Americans as I am that the US military and special forces are planning covert operations to attack Iran.

    Last March Dan Joyner observed on his blog that IAEA leaked information that US used to build a “Top-Secret U.S. Replica of Iran Nuclear Sites Key to Weapons Deal.”

    Quoting from an LA Times article, Joyner posted:

    U.S. officials won’t comment on the classified research, which is being conducted at an undisclosed location in the United States. But former officials and private analysts say American agencies have constructed models of the Iranian facilities, relying on informants in Iran, information from foreign governments and voluminous data about Iran’s program collected by the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog.

    Joyner commented that IAEA’s ability to function requires absolute confidentiality.

    It is not unlikely that names of Iranian nuclear scientists who were assassinated (likely by Mossad operatives) were identified through IAEA inspections/leaks.

    Times of Israel reported that In Tennessee, a mock Iranian nuke facility tests breakout time US scientists provide information to negotiators on Tehran’s program, based on a replica, the New York Times reports.

    The US Congress and DoD are not to be trusted when it comes to Iran or, in fact, any foreign policy.

    We the People have got to demand that our government stop subverting, destabilizing, destroying, overthrowing, attacking and killing and calling it security and diplomacy.

    George Washington offered good counsel on how the people of the Constitutional Republic of the United States ought to conduct their affairs with foreign nations:

    Observe good faith and justice towards all Nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and Morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great Nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt, that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages, which might be lost by a steady adherence to it ? Can it be, that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a Nation with its Virtue? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices ?

    32 In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential, than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular Nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The Nation, which indulges towards another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness, is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The Nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the Government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The Government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times, it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of Nations has been the victim.

    33 So likewise, a passionate attachment of one Nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite Nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite Nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the Nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained; and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens, (who devote themselves to the favorite nation,) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.

    34 As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent Patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practise the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the Public Councils! Such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a great and powerful nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.

    35 Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens,) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove, that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defence against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  18. No, the real wimps are those who still call for peaceful resistance.
    The time for dialogue has expired for the traitors in fed gov and their lackys in the states.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factor"] says:

    http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/15/oakland-kids-who-cuss-teachers-out-no-longer-need-to-fret-about-getting-suspended/

    yes, we are a nation of wimps but not necessarily in the way Ron Paul thinks we are.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  20. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factor"] says:

    We live in a world of meritocraZy than meritocraCy.

    Ever notice that some of the smartest and richest people in America push the craziest agendas?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  21. Person says:

    I was pondering earlier today how Americans had become such cowards, and then I serendipitously came across this article. I attempted to be courteous earlier in the day, and it seems it was interpreted as a threat – because no modern American can believe an adult male they don’t know is more likely to be friendly than not, regardless of the fact that it was in a public area with people all around.

    I can understand that people are sometimes fearful and that is not necessarily a bad thing – but to be so frightened of normal, everyday life and good manners? That can only be cowardice.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  22. Stonehands is unfortunately right, this all boils down to power and the only way power is gained throughout history is via violence. To think that we are going to actually change things for the better with voting or demonstrating is utterly ridiculous at this point.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Ron Paul Comments via RSS