The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersThe Journal of Historical Review
Life Styles: Native and Imposed
‘The Blame of Those Ye Better’
🔊 Listen
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_728405233

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Images
List of Tables
List of Bookmarks

For decades now, African American leaders have been calling for a formal United States apology forthe American role in the slave trade, with some even demanding reparations. Indian tribes proclaim their tax-exempt status as something they are owed for a legacy of persecution by the United States. Mexican Americans in the southwest United States seek to incorporate this region, including California, into Mexico, or even to set up an independent nation, Aztlan, that will recreate the glories of the Aztec empire, destroyed centuries ago by the imperialistic Spaniards.

That we live in an age of grievance and victimhood is not news. But did these peoples – these Mexican-Americans, these Native Americans, these African-Americans – really lose more than they gained in their confrontation with the West? Were they robbed of nobility, and coarsened? Or did White subjugation force them to shed savagery and barbarousness, and bring them, however unwillingly, into civilized humanity?

Today our children our being taught that the people who lived in the pre-Columbian Western Hemisphere were not “merciless Indian savages” (as Jefferson calls them in the Declaration of Independence), many of whom delighted in torture and cannibalism, but rather spiritually enlightened “native Americans” whose wise and peaceful nobility was rudely destroyed by invading European barbarians; that the Aztecs were not practitioners of human sacrifice and cannibalism on a scale so vast that the mind of the 20th-century American can hardly comprehend it, but rather defenders of an advanced civilization that was destroyed by brutal Spanish conquistadores; and that Africans were not uncultured slave traders and cannibals, but unappreciated builders of great empires.

But just how did these peoples live before they came into contact with Europeans? Although historical myth is ever more rapidly replacing factual history, not only in popular culture but also in our schools and universities, we may still find accurate historical accounts buried in larger libraries or in used book stores.

Aztec Civilization

In his famous work, The Conquest of New Spain, Bernal Diaz del Castillo describes the march on Mexico with his captain, Hernan Cortés, in 1519. The Spanish forces set out from the Gulf of Mexico, and one of the first towns they visited was Cempoala, situated near the coast, where Cortés told the chiefs that “they would have to abandon their idols which they mistakenly believed in and worshipped, and sacrifice no more souls to them.” As Diaz relates:

Every day they sacrificed before our eyes three, four, or five Indians, whose hearts were offered to those idols, and whose blood was plastered on the walls. The feet, arms, and legs of their victims were cut off and eaten, just as we eat beef from the butcher’s in our country. I even believe that they sold it in the tianguez or markets.

Of their stay in Tenochtitlan, the present-day Mexico City and the heart of the Aztec empire, Diaz writes that Emperor Montezuma’s servants prepared for their master

more than thirty dishes cooked in their native style … I have heard that they used to cook him the flesh of young boys. But as he had such a variety of dishes, made of so many different ingredients, we could not tell whether a dish was of human flesh or anything else … I know for certain, however, that after our Captain spoke against the sacrifice of human beings and the eating of their flesh, Montezuma ordered that it should no longer be served to him.

In renouncing cannibalism, was Montezuma cooperating in the destruction of his Aztec “cultural roots,” or was he aiding a victory of civilized custom over barbaric?

A few pages later, Diaz provides a detailed description of

the manner of their [that is, the Aztecs’] sacrifices. They strike open the wretched Indian’s chest with flint knives and hastily tear out the palpitating heart which, with the blood, they present to the idols in whose name they have performed the sacrifice. Then they cut off the arms, thighs, and head, eating the arms and thighs at their ceremonial banquets. The head they hang up on a beam, and the body of the sacrificed man is not eaten but given to the beasts of prey.

This contemporary Aztec drawing of a human sacrifice ritual shows a priest cutting out the heart of a victim. (From the \"Codex Laud,\" reproduced from the book, \"The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya,\" by M. Miller and K. Taube, p. 97.)
This contemporary Aztec drawing of a human sacrifice ritual shows a priest cutting out the heart of a victim. (From the "Codex Laud," reproduced from the book, "The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya," by M. Miller and K. Taube, p. 97.)

Diaz also describes the great market of Tenochtitlan, and its

dealers in gold, silver, and precious stones, feather, cloaks, and embroidered goods, and male and female slaves who are also sold there. They bring as many slaves to be sold in that market as the Portuguese bring Negroes from Guinea. Some are brought there attached to long poles by means of collars round their necks to prevent them from escaping, but others are left loose.

Plainly it was the Spanish who stamped out human sacrifice and cannibalism among the people of pre-Cortesian Mexico. As for slavery, it is as obvious that the Europeans did not introduce it to the New World as it is that they eradicated it, albeit not immediately. Moreover, the moral impulse to end slavery came from the West, specifically out of England. Had the Aztecs, Indians, and Africans been left to their own devices, slavery might well have endured in North and South America, as it does in parts of present-day Africa.

North American Natives
Following the ceremony in which humans are sacrificed to their gods, high-ranking Aztecs eat the flesh of the victims. (A contemporary Spanish illustration, from the \"Codex Magliabechiano,\" 72 verso, reproduced from the book \"Aztecs: An Interpretation,\" by Inga Clendinnen.)
A contemporary Spanish witness commented: \"This figure demonstrates the abominable thing that the Indians did on the day they sacrificed to their idols. After [the sacrifice] they placed many large earthen cooking jars of that human meat in front of the idol they called Mictlantecutli, which means lord of the place of the dead, as it is mentioned in other parts [of this book]. And they gave and distributed it to the nobles and overseers, and to those who served inthe temple ofthe demon, whom they called tlamacazqui [priests]. And these [persons] distributed among their friends and families that [flesh] and these [persons] which they had given [to the god as a human victim]. They say it tasted like pork meat tastes now. And for this reason pork is very desirable among them.”
Following the ceremony in which humans are sacrificed to their gods, high-ranking Aztecs eat the flesh of the victims. (A contemporary Spanish illustration, from the "Codex Magliabechiano," 72 verso, reproduced from the book "Aztecs: An Interpretation," by Inga Clendinnen.)
A contemporary Spanish witness commented: "This figure demonstrates the abominable thing that the Indians did on the day they sacrificed to their idols. After [the sacrifice] they placed many large earthen cooking jars of that human meat in front of the idol they called Mictlantecutli, which means lord of the place of the dead, as it is mentioned in other parts [of this book]. And they gave and distributed it to the nobles and overseers, and to those who served inthe temple ofthe demon, whom they called tlamacazqui [priests]. And these [persons] distributed among their friends and families that [flesh] and these [persons] which they had given [to the god as a human victim]. They say it tasted like pork meat tastes now. And for this reason pork is very desirable among them.”

In his epic work France and England in North America, the great American historian Francis Parkman describes the early 17th-century recreational and culinary habits of the Iroquois Indians (also known as the Five Nations, from whom, some will have it, the United States derived elements of its Constitution). He tells that the Iroquois, along with other tribes of northeastern United States and Canada, “were undergoing that process of extermination, absorption, or expatriation, which, as there is reason to believe, had for many generations formed the gloomy and meaningless history of the greater part of this continent.” Parkman describes an attack by the Iroquois on an Algonquin hunting party, late in the autumn of 1641, and the Iroquois’ treatment of their prisoners and victims:

They bound the prisoners hand and foot, rekindled the fire, slung the kettles, cut the bodies of the slain to pieces, and boiled and devoured them before the eyes of the wretched survivors. “In a word,” says the narrator [that is, the Algonquin woman who escaped to tell the tale], “they ate men with as much appetite and more pleasure than hunters eat a boar or a stag …”

The conquerors feasted in the lodge till nearly daybreak … then began their march homeward with their prisoners. Among these were three women, of whom the narrator was one, who had each a child of a few weeks or months old. At the first halt, their captors took the infants from them, tied them to wooden spits, placed them to die slowly before a fire, and feasted on them before the eyes of the agonized mothers, whose shrieks, supplications, and frantic efforts to break the cords that bound them were met with mockery and laughter …

The Iroquois arrived at their village with their prisoners, whose torture was

designed to cause all possible suffering without touching life. It consisted in blows with sticks and cudgels, gashing their limbs with knives, cutting off their fingers with clam-shells, scorching them with firebrands, and other indescribable torments. The women were stripped naked, and forced to dance to the singing of the male prisoners, amid the applause and laughter of the crowd …

On the following morning, they were placed on a large scaffold, in sight of the whole population. It was a gala-day. Young and old were gathered from far and near. Some mounted the scaffold, and scorched them with torches and firebrands; while the children, standing beneath the bark platform, applied fire to the feet of the prisoners between the crevices … The stoicism of one of the warriors enraged his captors beyond measure … they fell upon him with redoubled fury, till their knives and firebrands left in him no semblance of humanity. He was defiant to the last, and when death came to his relief, they tore out his heart and devoured it; then hacked him in pieces, and made their feast of triumph on his mangled limbs.

All the men and all the old women of the party were put to death in a similar manner, though but few displayed the same amazing fortitude. The younger women, of whom there were about thirty, after passing their ordeal of torture, were permitted to live; and, disfigured as they were, were distributed among the several villages, as concubines or slaves to the Iroquois warriors. Of this number were the narrator and her companion, who … escaped at night into the forest …

Of the above account, Parkman writes: “Revolting as it is, it is necessary to recount it. Suffice it to say, that it is sustained by the whole body of contemporary evidence in regard to the practices of the Iroquois and some of the neighboring tribes.”

Human sacrifice, often accompanied by ceremonial cannibalism, was a feature of Aztec religious ritual. As this contemporary drawing shows, a priest wielding a stone dagger has just ripped out the heart of a victim, and is offering it to the Aztec sun god, Tonatiuh.
Human sacrifice, often accompanied by ceremonial cannibalism, was a feature of Aztec religious ritual. As this contemporary drawing shows, a priest wielding a stone dagger has just ripped out the heart of a victim, and is offering it to the Aztec sun god, Tonatiuh.

The “large scaffold” on which the prisoners were placed, is elsewhere in his narrative referred to by Parkman as the Indians’ “torture-scaffolds of bark,” the Indian equivalent of the European theatrical stage, while the tortures performed by the Indians on their neighbors – and on the odd missionary who happened to fall their way – were the noble savages’ equivalent of the European stage play.

If the descendants of the New England tribes now devote their time to selling tax-free cigarettes, running roulette wheels or dealing out black jack hands, rather than to the capture, torture, and consumption of their neighboring tribesmen, should we not give thanks to those brave Jesuits who sacrificed all to redeem these “native Americans”?

Native Africans

What kind of life did the African live in his native land, before he was brought to America and introduced to Western civilization? That slavery was widely practiced in Africa before the coming of the white man is beyond dispute. But what sort of indigenous civilization did the African enjoy?

In A Slaver’s Log Book, which chronicles the author’s experiences in Africa during the 1820s and 1830s, Captain Theophilus Conneau (or Canot) describes a tribal victory celebration in a town he visited after an attack by a neighboring tribe:

On invading the town, some of the warriors had found in the Chief’s house several jars of rum, and now the bottle went round with astonishing rapidity. The ferocious and savage dance was then suggested. The war bells and horns had sounded the arrival of the female warriors, who on the storming of a town generally make their entry in time to participate in the division of the human flesh; and as the dead and wounded were ready for the knife, in they came like furies and in the obscene perfect state of nakedness, performed the victorious dance which for its cruelties and barbarities has no parallel.

Some twenty-five in number made their appearance with their faces and naked bodies besmeared with chalk and red paint. Each one bore a trophy of their cannibal nature. The matron or leader … bore an infant babe newly torn from its mother’s womb and which she tossed high in the air, receiving it on the point of her knife. Other Medeas followed, all bearing some mutilated member of the human frame.

Rum, powder, and blood, a mixture drunk with avidity by these Bacchantes, had rendered them drunk, and the brutal dance had intoxicated them to madness. Each was armed also with some tormenting instrument, and not content with the butchering outside of the town of the fugitive women, they now surrounded the pile of the wounded prisoners, long kept in suspense for the coup de grâce. A ring was formed by the two-legged tigresses, and accompanied by hideous yells and encouraging cry of the men, the round dance began. The velocity of the whirling soon broke the hideous circle, when each one fell on his victims and the massacre began. Men and women fell to dispatching the groaning wounded with the most disgusting cruelties.

I have seen the tiger pounce on the inoffensive gazelle and in its natural propensity of love of blood, strangle its victim, satiate its thirst, and often abandon the dead animal. But not so with these female cannibals. The living and dying had to endure a tormenting and barbarous mutilation, the women showing more cannibal nature in the dissection of the dead than the stronger sex. The coup de grâce was given by the men, but in one instance the victim survived a few minutes when one of those female furies tormented the agony of the dying man by prostrating herself on his body and there acting the beast of double backs.

The matron, commander of these anthrophagies, with her fifty years and corpulous body, led the cruelties on by her example. The unborn babe had been put aside for a bonne bouche, and now adorned with a string of men’s genital parts, she was collecting into a gourd the brains of the decapitated bodies. While the disgusting operating went on, the men carved the solid flesh from the limbs of the dead, throwing the entrails aside.

About noon the butchering was at an end, and a general barbecuing took place. The smell of human flesh, so disgusting to civilized man, was to them the pleasing odor so peculiarly agreeable to a gastronomer …

The barbecuing over, an anthrophagous repast took place, when the superabundant preserved flesh was packed up in plantain leaves to be sent into the Interior for the warriors’ friends. I am silent on the further cruelties that were practiced this day on the unfortunate infirm and wounded that the different scouting parties brought in during the day, supposing the reader to be sick enough at heart at the above representation.

Vanishing History

This is the history that has been handed down to us by men who either were present when the recorded events took place – that is, Diaz and Conneau – or who had access to period documents – that is, Parkman. But this factual history has suffered greatly at the hands of politically correct myth-mongers. The books themselves are disappearing from the shelves: Conneau’s book has been out of print for nearly a generation; perhaps Diaz’s and Parkman’s will follow in the next 20 years. In its place, the most absurd historical fantasies are substituted. As the seemingly inexorable forces of political correctness grind on, we may be left with as much knowledge of our true history as Orwell’s Winston Smith had of his.

Were it not for their subjugation by Europeans, Mexicans would perhaps have continued to practice the Aztec traditions of slavery, human sacrifice and cannibalism; many American Indians would probably still be living their sad and perilous life of nomadism, subsistence farming, and warfare; and Africans would likely be expiring in even greater numbers on the fields of mayhem and slaughter (as the world has noted to its horror in Rwanda, Liberia and Congo), when not being bought and sold as slaves (as still is done in Sudan and Mauritania).

In his 1965 work, The Course of Empire: The Arabs and their Successors, the sagacious Glubb Pasha wrote in defense of Western colonialism:

Foreign military conquest has not only enabled backward people to acquire the skills and the culture of the conquerors, but it has often administered a salutary shock to the lethargic mentality of the inhabitants, among whom the desire to rise to equality with the foreigners has roused a new spirit of energy … Britain has permeated Asia and Africa with her ideas of government, of law and of ordered civilization. The men of races who less than a hundred years ago were naked are now lawyers, doctors and statesmen on the stage of the world.

But if the present trend of denigrating the West’s mission civilisatrice continues, the achievements of that great civilizing venture might well be squandered and lost forever. If we permit inhumane customs and mores to reassert themselves, the ultimate dissolution of the West itself is not an impossibility. In his famous poem “White Man’s Burden,” Rudyard Kipling eloquently spelled out the fate of a culture that loses faith in itself and its mission:

And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch Sloth and heathen Folly
Turn all your hope to naught.

(Republished from JHR, May/Jun 1998 by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 55 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Most Americans and myself would fully support a “right of return” citizenship path for anyone who proves with real documents that their ancestors originated in the USA. The GOP should sponsor this to upset the open border crazies. Everyone knows that 99.999999% of those wanting to immigrate to the USA have no ancestral ties north of the border. A few hundred might have evidence, so let them in and tell the others to stay home.

    Whenever some nitwit claims the SW part of the USA was part of Spain or Mexico, I ask how did those Europeans based in Madrid and Mexico City acquire these lands? Did they purchase them from someone? No, some guy just waved his hand and proclaimed vast regions belonged to Spain and later Mexico.

    Students of history know that Mexico legally belongs to France. But we never hear of Frenchmen complaining.

    • Agree: Jim Christian
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  2. What is interesting is that Mexico maintains an almost blatant White Supremacy and yet the Aztecs who would like to run through Washington DC throwing knives like Danny Trejo manage to be kept under thumb by white Criollo like Vincente in Mexico.

    • Replies: @Wally
  3. pensword says:

    Thank you for presenting this compelling piece.

    I see this as an antidote to a particularly stifling variety of political correctness, and I’m not convinced you’re claiming that occidental endeavor alone is responsible for civilizing the world, since there is copious evidence that proves otherwise.

    By and large, the concept of religious liberty was anathema to Europe prior to Andalusian Spain. With respect to the same period, the Church acted as a virtual monopoly throughout the continent, condemning the very act of earning profit as “usurious.” This was not the case in North Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian Subcontinent. Additionally, the world’s first universities were established in North Africa.

    Paper, a commodity whose availability we now take for granted, was introduced to Europe via the Arab muslim world, which also introduced, inter alia, the practices of quarantine, inoculation, and navigation by means of spherical trigonometry. Were it not for Arabic translations of Greek tomes of antiquity, such knowledge would have been consigned to the dustbin of history.

    Of course, this is a mere sample of information that anyone might easily find if they bother to do so. It would be just as unwise to deny it as it would the great accomplishments that arose out of Europe.

    • Replies: @Biff
    , @Biff
    , @DeMar
  4. Biff says:

    Sorry, I see no moral high ground from any element of humanity. In 2018 we are still ‘barely out of the jungle’. I do agree with the author that there is a consorted effort to re-write history, but at the same time, the attempt to re-write history is as old as history itself.
    Back on the Columbus topic, the news papers of today(and text books in elementary/public schools) still refer to Columbus with one moniker – an explorer. His real occupation along members of his family was ‘Slave Trader’. He was commissioned to explore, but not in the scientific sense, but more accurately to expand the Spanish empire(which mostly done by stealing shit – that goes for all empires).

    Nope, the whole lot of them are sinners and pricks, but the more industrious usually gets the upper hand. BTW, where’s my servants – I need my feet cleaned.

    • Replies: @DeMar
  5. Spot on!

    All that nonsense about Indians (and I do not apologize for using this word) being so noble, humane and civilized or about the Blacks in their native Africa being poor victims of evil Europeans, it is just pathetic. Even more pathetic are the growing legions of half-wits that believe in this nonsense. It is all the result of an educational system that has systematically been dumbing down the generations born since the 1970s. So those poor half-wits are not really to blame, I am afraid.

    Anybody with a bit of a brain can figure out that to idealize Indians and Blacks in the way that has become politically correct, is to deny them their humanity: all men are inherently capable of both good and evil, that is precisely what history shows us. Of course Indians and Blacks were both good and bad, for they are essentially no different from us, European whites. Moreover, this is a Christian point of view and the only viable position to take in this world which may perish at any moment.

    During my over 20 years of teaching Latin American history at college level in the US and Europe, I have always stressed these points and always fund appreciative audiences. If more colleagues would have had the courage to stand up to the advance of idiocy in academe, I am sure we’d be better off today.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @Che Guava
    , @Anon
  6. edNels says:

    Here these archaic accounts of whites first taste of Aztec hospitality… and culinary stuff are really something a little different. But they seemed to scarf it up and only backed away after the Captain stated strictures on humans for dinner, lunch or breakfast too. So what, who says these writers weren’t just making it all up? The ability to spin a tall tale isn’t new. I don’t believe a word of it.

    And Parkman’s description of the naked African women doing their wild thing dance is damned good too. These guys were something though! They take the invitation to a big feast and go and enjoy the hell out of it, and then go and criticized.

    I don’t believe a word, just because it was from hundreds of years ago, like they couldn’t be lying their butts off! And psycho porno as well.

  7. utu says:

    Europeans had two approaches: Protestant that was exterminationist and Catholic that lead to assimilation through Christianization and miscegenation. Jesuits and Dominicans did a good job.

    Africa, however should have been left alone. The Scramble for Africa was a terrible mistake. Africa should have been quarantined and left for the future generation of anthropologist to study the development of human societies and cultures. However we would have to control Arab interference. Then by know we would see Africans like some Amazonian tribes that should be left alone and protected without interference.

    Bringing slaves from Africa was the greatest sin and mistake. This lead to the opening of Africa and our eternal guilt for which they will never let us atone.

    Eventually they will kill us all. They are dreaming of blood and revenge. There is no question about it.

    • Replies: @Da Wei
  8. I think it a disgrace that any excellent, objective work of history be “disappeared” on the basis of “political correctness”.
    However, trying to justify the West’s various “evils” on the basis that the objects of its Imperialism were somehow worse “evils” strikes me as morally self indulgent.
    Pot & kettle & an argument over blackness….
    It’s also rather … bold to suggest that these native people would have continued on with their distasteful practices absent our compassionate interventions.
    Maybe, maybe not.
    Alas, I lack the massive crystal balls of the author here.
    Nor I do not under rate the vast riches, both cultural & material, of Western Civilisation. But nor am I blind to the horrendous possibilities of today.
    The doomsday clock is at 2 minutes to midnight: this equals the worst “times” of the cold war.

  9. I wonder what the millions who died in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen have to say about the civilized, western intervention…?

    • LOL: Biff
    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  10. Realist says:

    For decades now, African American leaders have been calling for a formal United States apology forthe American role in the slave trade, with some even demanding reparations.

    Blacks have received their reparations….living in an infinity better country than any of the shithole African countries. The luckiest blacks on the planet are descendants of slaves.

  11. Miro23 says:
    @Hans Vogel

    All that nonsense about Indians (and I do not apologize for using this word) being so noble, humane and civilized or about the Blacks in their native Africa being poor victims of evil Europeans, it is just pathetic. Even more pathetic are the growing legions of half-wits that believe in this nonsense.

    But, the half-wits are out in force, enraged and “On Fire” about what may have happened at a teenage party 30 years ago.

    • Replies: @Da Wei
  12. @edNels

    And Parkman’s description of the naked African women doing their wild thing dance is damned good too.

    A more careful reading of the article would show that Parkman made no descriptions of any Africans. His writing was on North American Indians.

  13. Biff says:
    @pensword

    Additionally, the world’s first universities were established in North Africa.

    When you google today you get Karueein in Morocco at year 859, and some searches only go back to Balogna Italy at 1088. I remember researching the subject about the time Iraq was invaded 2003, and the two oldest were listed in Istanbul and Baghdad in around 600 AD. Makes sense since that was about the time math and science was really gaining a foothold in the Middle East.
    Seems like someone has been busy re-writing history.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  14. Biff says:
    @pensword

    And then there was this:

    As early as 700 B.C., there existed a giant University at Takshashila, located in the northwest region of Bharat(India).

    Taxila also known as Takshashila, flourished from 600 BC to 500 AD, in the kingdom of Gandhar. 68 subjects were taught at this university and the minimum entry age, ancient texts show, was 16. At one stage, it had 10,500 students including those from Babylon, Greece, Syria, and China. Experienced masters taught the vedas, languages, grammar, philosophy, medicine, surgery, archery, politics, warfare, astronomy, accounts, commerce, documentation, music, dance and other performing arts, futurology, the occult and mystical sciences,complex mathematical calculations. The panel of masters at the university included legendary scholars like Kautilya, Panini, Jivak and Vishnu Sharma. Thus, the concept of a full-fledged university was developed in India.

    https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-worlds-first-university

    • Replies: @Dr. Krieger
  15. Mike P says:
    @edNels

    Why would they make up those stories, though? To sell books?

    Cannibalism was common among our ancestors in Europe, too; there’s enough shattered bones left behind to prove it. Greek mythology contains human sacrifice, as does the bible.

    In New Guinea, cannibalism was a thing even in the 20th century – look up for example Kuru disease, which is “mad cow” disease transmitted by eating human brains. Cannibalism is part of the human condition.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  16. Sherlock says:

    BUSH MEAT ………
    KONDA The Konda were among the most proficient and brutal of slavers. Description of a Konda sword — Form specifically used for the capture of slaves for their human consumption (cannibalism) market. The Konda provided slaves for the Arab market as well as for domestic consumption, which was described by Glave in 1890. This weapon served in the confined quarters where captives were subdued and gathered. It served to control, disable and kill the victims while preserving the marketable corpse.
    NGOMBE/POTO — The Ngombe melded with the Poto who themselves were displaced and assimilated into the Bantu culture. As with all Congolese slavers, their weapons were designed for effective use in close quarters and later, used for dismemberment of slaves slaughtered for human consumption.
    MANDINGO — the period of the transatlantic slave trade of which Gambia and the Mandingo were pivotal elements. Since contact with the Portuguese in the 18th century and subsequently the British, the Mandingo supplied a steady stream of slaves for the North American and South American markets. It was the Mandingo from which Alex Haley drew his main character for now largely discredited “Roots” .
    TETELA — the late slave trade period which supplied the markets for the Arab world and South America. In this period, there were just two commodities produced in Africa, ivory and slaves, of whom millions were exported. The Tetela were slavers who used a variety of weapons depending on the situation. Shorter weapons served battle at close quarters as in the hut or kral with spears and sword used on the battle field. Once subdued, the adversaries were sorted for usefulness and saleablilty with fit men and women sent to market, and young men sometimes introduced into the ranks of the slavers. The old, infirm and wounded were executed. The Tetela were considered the most vicious and most feared of Congolese slavers. They were savage in their attacks which included tribal war for the purpose of slave captures. During the second half of the 19th century, tribal wars were specifically for the capture of slaves and not territorial.
    YAKA (Congo) —- The Yaka were ferocious warriors. They were slavers and likewise preyed on by their neighbors.
    ASHANTI — Slave raiding was all hand to hand combat often within confines of the hut or kral. The weapons needed were necessarily short. The Ashanti traded slaves and ivory with the English and Portuguese.
    AZANDE — Azande, whose name literally means “owners of much land,” entered the 19th century with a history of conquest and expansion. The descendants of great warriors faced economic and demographic changes which turned them to the industry which harvested humans for export to the Arab world, slavery. The trade was curtailed by the Anglo-French convention of 1899, before which it was the major occupation of Azande warriors.
    NBANDI — Lower Congo
    TIKAR — The Tikar controlled trade routes of the Hausa and Fulani to the coast, exacting tribute for passage. The trade, presumably included slaves and ivory. After 1800, the affected traders banded together and aided by Europeans, fought the Tikar. With no modern weapons, the Tikar were defeated and scattered as they themselves became the prey of the slavers. Large numbers became victims of the transatlantic slave trade. Reportedly, a large proportion of the males committed suicide on the slave ships.
    NGALA — Type used for the execution and hideous dismemberment of slaves for human consumption (cannibalism) witnessed and reported by Glave in 1890. By Glave’s account, captured slaves were lashed in the sitting position to a group of poles near a sapling which was pulled down and attached by a rope to a basket enclosing the victim’s head. The neck was severed with a stroke of the sword and the head flung with onlookers following and kicking it around in a soccer-like game. Glave reports that the baskets of body parts, dismembered for sale for human consumption, contained some with tattoos which he recognized as those of slaves he had seen bound alive the previous day.
    FANG — The Fang, noted for their carving in ivory, were cannibals as documented by Mary Kingsley who visited in 1893-95 and wrote Travels in West Africa, a 1897 best seller. The reports were confirmed independently by Sir Richard Burton. The Fang would wage war which, after the death of a few enemies, was concluded. The dead were brought home and eaten.
    OVAMBO — After the decline of the transatlantic slave trade, the Ovambo continued the trade, selling slaves for use within Africa.
    Cannabalism and violence in Africa. ‘The Naked Prey’ with Cornel Wilde trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bQc_rZumOw

  17. JackOH says:

    I’ve heard the “Columbus was a naughty boy” stuff off and on for years. This is, of course, about cherry-picking historical facts to propagandize for some current advantage, and it’s a scurvy racket.

    I’ll stipulate that conquest and subjugation of a people are pretty bad for the people conquered and subjugated, except for the people who are actually liberated, eventually, by the conquerors’ best qualities. Yesterday’s Aztecs removed hearts for sacrifice; today’s Mexican surgeons work on hearts to cure disease and extend life. America’s Blacks are, indeed, better off than most of their kin in Africa, although I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be a Black slave in Virginia.

    Kevin Beary is right to point out that just because a people has been defeated doesn’t make them virtuous. Would the critics of Columbus want the same logic applied to the Confederacy, Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy?

  18. @Daniel Rich

    I always appreciate it when people incapable of measuring proportion self identify.

    Thanks buddy!

  19. wayfarer says:

    Some insight into the NWO’s divide-and-conquer U.S. Civil War 2.0 agenda.

  20. @Carlton Meyer

    “No, some guy just waved his hand and proclaimed vast regions belonged to Spain and later Mexico.”

    Indeed. It always amazes me that liberals, who deny the claims of present day nation-states to territory they settled by dint of courage in battle, suffering and toil, have no trouble swallowing the legitimacy of Hispanic claims to “vast regions” just by virtue of some guy stepping ashore from a rowboat and saying “I claim this land in the name of Her Majesty the Queen, Isabella”.

    (and to confound things even further, they don’t even acknowledge the legitimacy of Monarchy or the Divine Right of Kings)

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  21. @edNels

    The book “The Negro in Negroland” is chock full of accounts written by diverse sources, men who explored darkest Africa one or two hundred years ago. They were missionaries, traders, explorers, botanists, soldiers, medical doctors etc. Their accounts are strikingly uniform in depicting just the behavior Beary describes above. Cannibalism was rampant. Torture was indulged as a recreation.

    It’s unlikely that so many different first-hand sources over such a long span of time would have agreed on so many points had there been no core of truth to the matter.

    Read it here:

    https://archive.org/details/negroesinnegrola00helpiala/page/n5

    • Replies: @edNels
    , @MBlanc46
  22. For a non-fiction account about modern missionaries’ encounter with stone-age Indians in the Amazon River basin, watch this movie on Amazon Prime. End of the Spear

    The missionaries intervened in an attempt to prevent neighboring tribes from killing each other off in intertribal warfare. And paid for that with their lives. More than 50% of native death was caused by warfare between these “peaceful children of the forest”.

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0399862/

  23. Anonymous[305] • Disclaimer says:
    @edNels

    Can’t speak for the other groups but there is archeological evidence of what the Aztecs did. Massive human sacrifice is attested to by skulls found neatly organized in rows.

  24. @ThreeCranes

    Aztec ire strangely does not seem directed at Spanish whites in Mexico who comprise I think 10-15% of the population who additionally own EVERYTHING in Mexico.

    The Aztecs seem obsessed with Anglo-Saxons.

    • Replies: @Anon
  25. Anonymous[305] • Disclaimer says:

    This is a needed corrective to mythologizing. However, let us not go too far in the opposite direction. I don’t contest the accuracy of these descriptions – I know already about the barbarity of the Aztecs – but rather how representative they are of all the inhabitants of these continents.

    Did the Maya engage in human sacrifice and cannibalism? Did the Inca? (That’s going to take some research)

    Did the Taino on Hispaniola? Certainly what Columbus did do the Taino is as barbaric as what you described.

    Did all Indian groups in North America behave as the Iroquois?

    Etc.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @utu
  26. Anonymous[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @Biff

    I remember researching the subject about the time Iraq was invaded 2003, and the two oldest were listed in Istanbul and Baghdad in around 600 AD. Makes sense since that was about the time math and science was really gaining a foothold in the Middle East.

    Except that, around 600 AD, ‘Istanbul’ was still known as Constantinople, and Baghdad didn’t yet exist, only being founded a century later after the Arab invasion. No, most of Mesopotamia was still solidly Persian around 600 AD.

  27. Wally says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    The Mexican Congress:

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  28. @Anonymous

    No, the Aztecs were particularly primitive and obsessed with death.

    They are also the tribe into which the Spanish intermarried to the greatest degree.

  29. The raw meathead who authored this article is using material that is little different to contemporary accounts demonizing Gaddafi with the claim he issued viagra to his soldiers to go on rape sprees, or claiming Assad gassed his own people knowing this would invite missile barrages or the so called ‘Serb rape camps’ as the excuse to bomb Yugoslavia and create Kosovo where NATO could set up shop. It was the propaganda of its’ era, for the most part, taking small bits of fact and blowing them so far out of proportion as to be a stereotype fantasy novel. Here’s a different point of view, based on 3+ decades actually living immersed in a Northern Plains culture contrasted to the idiocy of European perspective:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2018/06/19/my-political-introspection/

    ^ renamed ‘A Tribal Perspective’

    For those who prefer the facts via authentic Native humor:

    https://ronaldthomaswest.com/2013/05/24/essay-on-native-american-humor/

    ^

  30. Che Guava says:
    @Hans Vogel

    As for ‘Indian’.

    Russell Means, famous Indian activist of old times, feet-on-the ground Cold Warrior for Reagan in Nicaragua (not his best role, but surely a great adventure for him), and media star says it it is fine.

    Never having been to Nth. America, all of those I have met from the U.S.A. or those with significant ancestry from there prefer the term. That is only a few people, but from reading, most seem not to mind it, or take pride in it.

    What made me do the double take was when I was still buying the Japanese edition of NYT (IHT, it was so annoying that I was boycotting some time before it vanished).

    One of many annoyances (there are so many, they are liars), was an article in praise of some Indian-American.

    I thought, wow!, they are praising an American Indian, so unusual for Noo Yawk press!

    For sure, after reading a few lines, I was very disappointed to see that it was about some obscenely wealthy sub-continental immigrant.

    So I learnt something, of usage, but that was, IIRC, the final or near-final straw to stop me buying it at all.

    Seems to mainly be Canadidian commisars troubled by it. They have to separate the ice dwellers, but I have never seen a reference to Alaska’s related people as that either.

    I am pretty sure (cannot prove) that some in the more southerly parts of Canadidia would prefer not to have the cloyingly PC terms applied to themselves.

    BTW, Free Leonard Peltier! It is way past time, one of fake MLK-copy pantomime speechmaker Obama’s biggest failures was not to do so.

    If anyone reading has political connections, it would be a great move for justice if he were to be pardoned, also from the PoV of Trump, it would really be confounding his ‘resistance’, too. I have only read a little of the history, but from it, cannot see how Peltier is still in prison, Means and others did much the same kind of things.

    Wanted to write a reply to the article, not if not posting tonight.

  31. @Mike P

    “Cannibalism is part of the human condition.”

    So is incest. But most people have a visceral and, to all appearances, instinctual revulsion to cannibalism and incest. After a point the cannibals and the incestuous lose the genetic race, such that the behavior is considered non-normative/pathological, like lionesses that eat lion cubs.

    • Agree: Che Guava
  32. Agent76 says:

    There is not enough paper from the Bankster’s to pay everyone they have hand in killing and have killed using their funny money which has been cruel to the world in total.

    February 23, 2015 America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 222 Out of 239 Years – Since 1776

    The U.S. Has Only Been At Peace For 21 Years Total Since Its Birth. Below, I have reproduced a year-by-year timeline of America’s wars, which reveals something quite interesting: since the United States was founded in 1776, she has been at war during 214 out of her 235 calendar years of existence. In other words, there were only 21 calendar years in which the U.S. did not wage any wars.

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41086.htm

    • Replies: @Sir Launcelot Canning
  33. Pat Boyle says:

    Just as the proper translation of the slogan “White Privilege” is ‘Black Inferiority”, so too are the attacks on the accomplishments of Columbus a cover for the lack of accomplishments by Africans in general.

    We know that Columbus was not the first European to visit the New World. Currently that man is believed to be the Norseman Leif Erickson. There had long been runic accounts of the Norse visiting America but no one believed them until actual artifacts were found. So today there are tales of an even earlier Saint Brendan who sailed to the Americas in an a coracle.

    Nobody believes these Irish stories now but they will if someone just digs in the right place. But it won’t change anything. The leftists hate all white people – Norse, Irish or Italian. This commotion is not about history or discovery but about raw hatred. Blacks and Latinos have gained the social license to hate Europeans because they have done so much while blacks and browns have done so much less.

  34. @Wally

    You underscore my statement but do not explain it

  35. Che Guava says:

    The Romans opposed ritual human sacrifice, at least until the Empire, and cannibalism, always.

    Gladiator fights and capital punishment, I am not sure they count as ritual sacrifice.

    They did encounter people practising both that and cannibalism.

    The earliest account of Japan is from China, second century A.D., the major figure mentioned is a Queen Himiko, it seems of a small domain in Kyushu, the Chinese chroniclers wrote her name with characters meaning ‘horrible voice’. Modern Japanese has a less impolite rendering of her name. There is no talk of human sacrifice or ritual cannibalism.

    Likewise, the Greeks already hated the idea, although anybody who has read Homeros and the mythology knows that they had contact with people still practising it at times, and a memory of it, whether from themselves or earlier contacts.

    In China, it was rejected long in the distant past, as early as the Greeks and Romans had, although several of the emperors had people buried alive for company, as of course did some Pharaohs.

    The only European group which was still conducting ritual sacrifice when in contact with the Romans was the Druids, somebody even better read in history, of course, may contradict me on that.

    It did not happen in old Germania, etc.

    At times of famine or starvation, as in the USSR and PRC at times (although the latter is determined to conceal any details), the Donner party, those people in the aeroplane crash in the Andes in the 1970s, Japanese soldiers towards the defeat at times, would resort to cannibalism, but usually of people who were already dead (although in the three cases I cite that were not in the Americas, a few seem to have exceeded that, and like anybody else, not entirely sure of the Donner party on that point).

    There was a former Imperial Army soldier who had been driven mad by what he had seen, shot ball bearings at the Emperor with a slingshot, was locked up for a little while, when he was released, he was even more angry.

    I have never seen the version with English subtitles, but the English-language title is ‘The Emperor’s Naked Army Marches on’, or very close to that.

    Strongly recommended to anybody with some interest. Do not want to post spoilers, it is starting a little slow, but it is worth the wait. He is furious.

    As far as the combination of riual slaughter and cannibalism as a habit in Asia and Europe, it sems to have been confined to only a few groups, the last holdouts seem to have been the Druids, and, much later ended (or possibly not), the Kali cults in India. Others can offer different examples, perhaps not. Riual sacrifice and cannibalism seem to have become horrid things to be avoided, all over the place, very early, Egypt and Persia too.

  36. ” Glubb Pasha wrote in defense of Western colonialism: ”
    Ghandi once was asked what he thought about western civilisation.
    His answer was ‘it would be nice’.
    What Ghandi meant is well described in
    Ian Hernon, ‘Britain’s Forgotten Wars, Colonial Campaigns of the 19th Century’, 2003, 2007, Chalford – Stroud
    Massacres, shrapnel cannon and repeater rifles.
    But I wonder if we did much worse than say the Assyrian king Sargon.
    Whatever history book one reads, wars, small and big all the time, massacres, rape, pillage, arson.
    Just the 19th century European wars were decent wars, decent meaning just between armies of European countries.
    Slavery, as old as the world, as Harms writes in his very enlightening book about slavery
    Robert Harms, Das Sklavenschiff, Eine Reise in die Welt des Sklavenhandels’, München 2007 (The Diligent, New York, 2001) ‘the French aristocracy did not treat their peasants much better than slaves’.
    How British internal slavery for the navy functioned
    Roy & Lesley Adkins, ‘Jack Tar, The extraordinary lives of ordinary seamen in Nelson’s navy’, 2009 London
    Ordinary Britons were kidnapped in the same manner as African blacks.
    What we should do is explain to the world what we gave the world: steam engine, railroad, the Otto engine, the Diesel engine, the screw for ships, electricity, radio, airplanes, medical progress, etc.
    Maybe all the peoples that produced no progress should pay us.

  37. edNels says:
    @ThreeCranes

    Thanks for the link to reading material of old books. I just found out that Columbus Day was renamed something like Indigenous Peoples Day or something, and a lot of my friends who were Italian used to revere Columbus Day, and I say fine that was one of my favorites too.

    Oh, why couldn’t there just be a brand new holiday created on its own merit about the Indigenous People? I mean, in these days of less work days a week, and less and less, why not squeak in just one more holiday into the calendar, that wouldn’t break the bank, maybe they could pay for it with Father’s Day, and then later to be half way fair, Mother’s Day could become Ladies Day, or Anti rape day. etc. etc. way off topic…

    One book I read about Columbus that was interesting I thought was ”Columbus in the Americas” by Least Heat Moon.

    Now human sacrifice is one thing, usually full of ceremonial and stuff, but wholesale cannibalism, is a horror story that I can’t believe yet, though it isn’t impossible, but part of keeping it from becoming normal, (Soilent Green, around the corner… patent pending for sure!). Just remember that the well meaning sensitive approach of the New Guinea cannibals that only eat little bits of their ancestor’s brains and things as a religeous practice, and they got the mysterious disease: Creutzfeldt-Jakob… Mad Cow-Human.

  38. Utter cherry-picking disingenuous bullshit.

  39. utu says:
    @Anonymous

    Did all Indian groups in North America behave as the Iroquois?

    It was pretty common. Perhaps there were some differences. But there is a consensus among historians that it was wide spread.

    Juha Hiltunen “Spiritual and religious aspects of torture and scalping among the Indian cultures in Eastern North America, from ancient to colonial times”

    The most dramatic data comes from osteological examinations of burial grounds and massacre sites. One site in particular is a prime example. It is the Crow Creek archaeological ground in the Middle Missouri region, where the historical Mandan and Hidatsa tribes lived. It has been dated to around 1300 ad. What is astonishing here is a mass grave of about 500 men, women, and children, which almost all have been mutilated, tortured and scalped (Arkush & Allen 2006, Case 2010, Dye 2009: 131–2, Keeley 1996, LeBlanc 1999, Smith 1991). This prehistoric killing field stands as a horrible Pol Potian kind of landmark in Native American history

    In the eastern areas of North America it was quite common, especially among the matrilineal tribes, that the active torturers were women and children. This is a logical element in humiliating a male victim, whose masculinity is

    The victims were treated with certain respect, which may seem strange. This is manifested especially in the way in which the torturers spoke with them. According to this etiquette, the victims were metaphorically seen as beloved relatives, whose fate was to be a sacrified offer .

    A Place Under Heaven: Amerindian Torture and Cultural Violence in Colonial New France, 1609-1729

    https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1174&context=

    And also different form of cannibalism for different reason was practiced. Here Iroquois eating Jesuits because they were impressed with their conduct under torture:

    A Huron Indian who escaped Iroquois captivity described how a Jesuit was killed and eaten. The priest had endured great pain before his death, and the Iroquois told the Huron that they drank his blood and ate his flesh so that they could be as strong as the priest had

    Some Indians were lead to conversion because of the practice of torture:

    While some embraced the Christian message of mercy towards their captives, others resented the cultural intrusion and even overcompensated for it when the time came to burn captives. Among the Hurons, Algonquians, and particularly among the Iroquois, we can observe how Christianity did more to divide communities than unite them, and this divide manifested most acutely with the torture of captives. Even in the early seventeenth century, the French struggled to reconcile with the customs they abhorred, particularly when traditional non-combatants such as children became involved. As the seventeenth century progressed, this changed. Catholic priests found torture by fire a useful teaching point about the severity of damnation, Catholic devotion, as well as Christian mercy. They also found a steady stream of converts among the captives their Amerindian allies sent to the flames. Finally, by the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, the French and Amerindians began to combine each others’ customs when captured. When death became imminent, many sang their death song or prayed while walking to the torture platform. Whether French or Amerindian, they often met this death calmly as early Christian martyrs, or brave Algonquian warrior.

  40. @Biff

    But what have they done for us lately?

  41. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Because the aztecs love Spain , love spanish culture , are spanish .

    You arrogant greedy anglocabrones are not simpatico , you generate rejection .

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  42. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hans Vogel

    http://interaccionalternativa.blogspot.com/2012/08/lo-que-aporto-espana-al-continente.html

    for your clases

    Spain , brought to the Americas more than 3.000 years of euroasian advances , euroasian advances .

    The american natives where in the neolitic , did nor even know the wheel , writing , there were canibals ,commited human sacrifices , incest .

    I beleive that europeans civilized them , the same way that grecoromans civilized Europe .

  43. MBlanc46 says:
    @ThreeCranes

    It’s definitely worth a read.

  44. Or did White subjugation force them to shed savagery and barbarousness, and bring them, however unwillingly, into civilized humanity?

    It’s a silly argument, because the colonial powers didn’t establish colonies to “civilize the natives.” They established colonies to obtain resources, and when the laws of “civilized people” were inconvenient they were simply ignored. The same attitude prevails in the colonies of today.

    Also, cannibalism hasn’t gone anywhere:

    https://www.rt.com/news/440463-russian-cannibal-girl-anime/

  45. Capn Mike says:

    ” What kind of life did the African live in his native land, before he was brought to America and introduced to Western civilization? That slavery was widely practiced in Africa before the coming of the white man is beyond dispute. But what sort of indigenous civilization did the African enjoy?”

    Muhammad Ali:
    “Champ, what did you think of Africa?” Ali replied, “Thank God my granddaddy got on that boat!”

  46. DeMar says:
    @pensword

    The myth of the preservation of Greek philosophy by Muslims has been dealt with by Dario Fernandez-Morera in “The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain.” 75% of Greek writings were already in Constantinople by the time of the Muslim conquests of that region. Also see https://stix1972.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/myths-of-arabic-preservation-of-greek-philosphy-debunked/ for a more concise article, though I highly recommend Dr. Fernandez-Morera’s book.

    The University of al-Qarawiyyin is older than that of Bologna, but Muslim universities until relatively recently did not allow study of the breadth of subjects offered in the European universities. They concentrate on Islamic religious and legal sciences with a heavy emphasis on Classical Arabic and law as understood under Islam. Quite the contrary of politically correct doctrine, the advance of Western thought owes a huge debt of gratitude to the Catholic Church. See “How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization”by Thomas Woods for more in this.

  47. DeMar says:
    @Biff

    I’ve read a couple of biographies of Columbus and many histories that include him. I’ve never come across him being a slave trader. Can you point to a reference?

  48. Guilt is a powerful weapon – perhaps even more so now in the internet age.

    It’s important that we realize this and refuse to acknowledge any guilt unless their is an explicit and justified reason to do so. Those who dig up history and try to use it as a weapon should be rejected outright.

    Do the Mongolians of today have shame for the destruction of Baghdad? (Which set Middle East back hundreds of years.) The devastation of China? The subjugation of modern day Russia? No and they shouldn’t. Should the Turks, the descendants of the Ottomans, feel bad for trashing the Balkans, almost wiping out Bulgarian culture, oppression of the Greeks, various Arab people’s and especially my own Armenian ancestors?

    No.

    Sure you can acknowledge something happened. Trying to atone is nonsense as well as showing any guilt for something you had no part in. Just as your legacy is built off your ancestors victories and defeats and the consequences of them, so is everyone elses. To pretend as if there needs to be compensation for the actions your genetic legacy from 5000 years ago to now is laughable and should be dismissed as such.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
    , @Avery
  49. @Agent76

    Wow, some of these I have never heard of. Thanks.

  50. @armenia4ever

    Based on your claim — the genetic history of mankind starts with Africa . . . far longer than 5000 years, t’is a wonder why you chose 5000, though not much.

    There is no attempt to redress genetic history from a mode of genetic history —

    Recognizing Columbus’s contribution to the navigation of the seas and overcoming the distance is appropriate and valuable in my view. Whether i have to dismiss brutal treatment by people claiming to be bringers of Christ — is another matter.

  51. Avery says:
    @armenia4ever

    { Should the Turks, the descendants of the Ottomans, feel bad for trashing the Balkans, almost wiping out Bulgarian culture, oppression of the Greeks, various Arab people’s and especially my own Armenian ancestors?

    No.}

    YES.

    I highly doubt you are of Armenian ancestry: it is almost always Turks posing as Armenians who preach “Forgive and Forget”. (almost: there certainly are confused, ahem, ‘Armenians’)

    Turks of today are not much different than the nomad savage UygurTürkoğlar that invaded the Armenian Highlands centuries ago.
    Turks and the state of Turkey still are trying to erase what is left of the Armenian nation – the Republic of Armenia.
    Turks are still occupying 40% of Cyprus, from which the nomad invaders have completely ethnically cleansed the indigenous Cypriots.
    The fascist, genocidal state of Turkey is actively supporting the criminal Aliyev regime and the fake state of Azerbaijan in their goal of exterminating the native people of Artsakh (aka Nagorno Karabagh), the indigenous Armenians.
    During the Artsakh war of 1988-1994, retired Turks, NATO generals and officers, were in Baku advising the mass-murderers in their attempted extermination of Artsakh Armenians by their Caspian Turk cousins.
    Grey Wolf “volunteers” (actually Turk Special Forces) were fighting in Artsakh and killing Armenians.
    And on, and on, and on…..
    Turks have never given up their centuries long goal of wiping out every last Armenian from our ancestral lands.

    Safaroglu (aka Safarov) is a national hero (sic) in his native Turkbaijan for murdering a sleeping Armenian officer with an axe.

    What the Hell are you talking about homes?

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  52. @Anon

    Actually, pendejo, Aztecs were not Spanish. They were, um, Aztecs.

    And modern Mexicans are typically NOT mostly Spanish either.

    What was your point about “Spanish” Aztecs?

  53. Da Wei says:
    @Miro23

    “But, the half-wits are out in force, enraged and “On Fire” about what may have happened at a teenage party 30 years ago.”

    Yeah, and nobody got eaten.

  54. Da Wei says:
    @utu

    utu, I’d like to respond to what you have said, because many seem to share your view that the outraged Negroes — and perhaps even Mexicans and others — will rise up and take over America, because of the past misdeeds of us white people. At least I think that’s what you’ve said and it it’s not, bear with me.

    “Bringing slaves from Africa was the greatest sin and mistake. This lead to the opening of Africa and our eternal guilt for which they will never let us atone.” – utu

    Here is a brief anecdote, if I may. A few weeks ago I accepted an invitation to visit a museum in Shenzhen (PRC), where one of the curators presented a 1,500 year old burial vault of a prominent Chinese merchant. The vault itself was several feet wide and greater in length and had been lined with stone tablets or tiles, each about 2 feet by nearly 3 feet high. Once unearthed, the tomb had been pilfered and the curator spent 10 years searching out the tiles from China, Europe and the USA. The pieces were valued, because of the figures etched in detail on each one. There was no writing on them, but, assembled, they told in picture form a loose biography of the deceased.

    Now, to my point. The Chinese had slaves taken from East Africa (by Arabs, I suppose) who worked on the Silk Road, and all this was relevant to the deceased merchant. I studied one particular panel consumed entirely by an African slave with head askew, holding a stringed instrument similar to a lute or banjo, and with legs and feet flung upward in jointless abandon. The curator explained to me that the Negroes liked to drink bai jiu (hootch), make music and dance. That was 1,500 years ago in China.
    This man is a highly cultivated and highly respected art collector. His credentials are impeccable, and he is straightforward and entirely bereft of the kind of sheepish chagrin you would expect of his American or British counterpart. He is, in other words, not about bullshit.

    To me, white American that I am, this was the highlight of the day, this one panel. I marveled that I had never heard Negroes ever complain of being subjugated as slaves by the Chinese. Doubtless, the Chinese have never heard that, either, and for good reason. It wouldn’t fly in China, where there is no PC and such pathetic grievances would be rightly scoffed at. There are no “survivors of slavery” in China, because nobody gives a shit. These people have faced real problems, but they keep it to themselves. And they work.

    So, why the difference between there and the USA, where we are beaten up by “survivors of slavery” and “white privilege” and — importantly — we listen to it and believe it?

    This isn’t rhetorical; I have an answer. It’ because our educational system and our media, our god-forsaken money system and our Congressional whores all conspire against us with the same agenda: to beat down and subjugate white America and to give our country away to carpetbaggers from everywhere but home. They have found the supreme model of guilt — the “Holocaust” — works like a charm to keep guilt ridden white Europeans and Americans in the stocks of public contempt and they’ve used that same phony formula to militarize women and racial “minorities”. Hell, everybody is a “survivor” these days.

    Well, that may fly in the JewSA, but only because we allow it. Without our welfare socialism, we wouldn’t be talking of paybacks of any kind. If you want something, work for it.

  55. anon[250] • Disclaimer says:

    “Don’t forgot to have your boarding passes ready my niggaz and don’t forget your $20 in reparations. This flight to Freetown, Liberia has no food service but water is available for
    $20/ bottle. Thanks and good ridance.”

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.