The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Paul Craig Roberts ArchiveBlogview
Washington Leads the World to War
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

What must the world think watching the US presidential campaign? Over time US political campaigns have become more unreal and less related to voters’ concerns, but the current one is so unreal as to be absurd.

The offshoring of American jobs by global corporations and the deregulation of the US financial system have resulted in American economic failure. One might think that this would be an issue in a presidential campaign.

The neoconservative ideology of US world hegemony is driving the US and its vassals into conflict with Russia and China. The risks of nuclear war are higher than at any previous time in history. One might think that this also would be an issue in a presidential campaign.

Instead, the issues are Trump’s legal use of tax laws and his non-hostile attitude toward President Putin of Russia.

One might think that the issue would be Hillary’s extremely hostile attitude toward Putin (“the new Hitler”), which promises conflict with a major nuclear power.

As for benefitting from tax laws, Pat Buchanan pointed out that Hillary used to her benefit a loss almost as large as Trump’s and during the Arkansas years Hillary even took a tax deduction for itemized pieces of used clothing donated to a charity, including $2 for one of Bill’s used underpants.

The vice presidential “debate” revealed that the Democratic Party’s candidate is so ignorant that he thinks Putin, who is democratically elected and has enormous public support, is a dictator.

Here is what we know about the two presidential candidates. Hillary has a long list of scandals from Whitewater and Vince Foster to Benghazi and violation of national security protocols. She is bought-and-paid-for by the oligarchs on Wall Street, in the mega-banks, and in the military-security complex as well as by foreign interests. The proof is the Clinton’s $120 million personal fortune and the $1,600 million in their foundation. Goldman Sachs did not pay Hillary $675,000 for three 20-minute speeches for the wisdom they contained.

What we know about Trump is that the oligarchic establishment cannot stand him and has ordered the Ministry of Propaganda, a.k.a., the US media, to destroy him.

Clearly, Hillary is the candidate of the One Percent, and Trump is the candidate for the rest of us.

Unfortunately, about half of the 99 percent is too dumb to know this.

Moreover, if Trump were to end up in the White House, it doesn’t mean he could prevail over the oligarchy.

The oligarchy is entrenched in Washington with control over economic and foreign policy positions, think tanks and other lobbyists, and the media.

The people control nothing.

What does the world think when they see Donald Trump damned because he doesn’t want war with Russia or the American economy moved offshore?

Where in American politics do Washington’s European, British, Canadian, Australian, and Japanese vassals see leadership worthy of their sacrifice of sovereignty and independent foreign policy? Where do they even see a modicum of intelligence?

Why does the world look to the most stupid, vile, arrogant, corrupt and murderous government on the planet for leadership?

War is the only destination to which Washington can lead.

(Republished from PaulCraigRoberts.org by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2016 Election, American Media, Donald Trump 
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
    []
  1. Miro23 says:

    The basic picture is that the US people are getting the governments they deserve. If they are so lazy, disconnected and cynical about Democracy then they open the door to the present Special Interest Plutocracy or more likely one day no Democracy at all.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Sharing Comment via Twitter
    /proberts/washington-leads-the-world-to-war/#comment-1597920
    More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  2. Rurik says:

    Clearly, Hillary is the candidate of the One Percent, and Trump is the candidate for the rest of us.

    Unfortunately, about half of the 99 percent is too dumb to know this.

    I wouldn’t simply put it down to dumb, although you can never go wrong betting on their collective stupidity

    but I think even more than stupidity there is the motivation of identity politics that bolsters the war sow’s prospects. Blacks and Hispanics and a few women will be voting for her to get a bigger share of the entitlement pie. Not to mention knowing how much that shrill, cackling gorgon’s voice is for the rest of us worse than ten thousand babies screaming with fingernails on black boards combined. They aren’t voting for Hitlery as much as they’re voting against the deplorables- the ‘patriarchy’ and all those ‘white, male construction workers’ that Robert Reich was shitting on. They don’t like us very much, and these select specimens are certainly not stupid per se

    so if you ask the typical BLM or La Raza voter if he’d prefer Hillary and more wars and corruption and more of these castrating hounds on the court, vs. a Donald Trump appointee, then they’re likely to prefer the ones pictured. Even knowing that they’re screwing their prospects for any hope of an honest country and prosperous future. The EBT card holders and race pimps would side with the one percent in a calculated and cynical preference for even more wars and cronyism because they really do hate the deplorables that much.

    Politics makes strange bedfellows indeed

    Read More
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    You could have at least posted a warning about the link.

    While I'm not prone to nightmares, I think I may have some tonight after clicking that link, if I can sleep at all !

    Good grief, man! Have some respect for yer fellow commenters, eh? ;)
    , @Anonymous Smith
    Hey, Rurik!

    Now, when you say "They don’t like us very much..." are you referring to liberals in general, er what? Or are you referring to women who look like men?

    Speaking of 'them'...I'm not sure if you've ever heard of a guy by the name of Noel Ignatiev; he was/is a Jewish professor at Harvard University. Although a white man himself (Ashkenazi Jews are not a different race), Ignatiev absolutely despises white people! Check out some of these quotes from Dr. Ignatiev...

    "The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists...Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed."

    "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign."

    Here's a good one...

    "If you are a white male, you don't deserve to live. You are a cancer, you're a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world!"

    How is this POS still breathing?! This shows us that groups like the Klu Klux Klan, the Aryan Brotherhood, the Neo-Nazi's, et. al., are nothing but a scam, a false front to serve the Jews in their plans to destroy America. David Duke, too...he's been so discredited, shamed, and slandered in the MSM, that he's now nothing but toxic waste! Every time the Jew's want to smear something they roll out David Duke to promote it...which automatically taints that thing!
  3. What must the world think watching the US presidential campaign?

    I just got back from Europe and if the people I met were in any way representative of the whole, I’d say nearly all would agree with your points. All of them.

    Moreover, if Trump were to end up in the White House, it doesn’t mean he could prevail over the oligarchy.

    As happened to Jesse Ventura in Minnesota when he was guv.

    Read More
  4. @Rurik

    Clearly, Hillary is the candidate of the One Percent, and Trump is the candidate for the rest of us.

    Unfortunately, about half of the 99 percent is too dumb to know this.
     
    I wouldn't simply put it down to dumb, although you can never go wrong betting on their collective stupidity

    but I think even more than stupidity there is the motivation of identity politics that bolsters the war sow's prospects. Blacks and Hispanics and a few women will be voting for her to get a bigger share of the entitlement pie. Not to mention knowing how much that shrill, cackling gorgon's voice is for the rest of us worse than ten thousand babies screaming with fingernails on black boards combined. They aren't voting for Hitlery as much as they're voting against the deplorables- the 'patriarchy' and all those 'white, male construction workers' that Robert Reich was shitting on. They don't like us very much, and these select specimens are certainly not stupid per se

    https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t31.0-8/p720x720/10603995_10153332503649384_6114905935391146369_o.jpg

    so if you ask the typical BLM or La Raza voter if he'd prefer Hillary and more wars and corruption and more of these castrating hounds on the court, vs. a Donald Trump appointee, then they're likely to prefer the ones pictured. Even knowing that they're screwing their prospects for any hope of an honest country and prosperous future. The EBT card holders and race pimps would side with the one percent in a calculated and cynical preference for even more wars and cronyism because they really do hate the deplorables that much.

    Politics makes strange bedfellows indeed

    You could have at least posted a warning about the link.

    While I’m not prone to nightmares, I think I may have some tonight after clicking that link, if I can sleep at all !

    Good grief, man! Have some respect for yer fellow commenters, eh? ;)

    Read More
    • Agree: Kiza
    • Replies: @Rurik
    mea culpa Jacques (and Kiza)

    my bad
  5. Russia has no choice but to leave Syria.

    Something Putin must come to accept is this: let’s say that Putin succeeds in reclaiming all of Syria’s original land and eliminating all enemy forces in Syria. Then once Russia leaves after accomplishing this, West will again send hundreds of thousands of armed and trained Arab/Muslim warriors to wage war on Assad and start reclaiming the land piece by piece.

    So, what this means is that Russia would have to stay in Syria FOR EVER! Is Russia willing to do this? Does Russia want to handle the cost, resources, and lost Russian soldier lives associated with staying in Syria forever, constantly fighting wave after wave of Arab/Muslim warriors trying to break into Syria? Think about it, Putin: Arabs and Muslims have extremely high fertility: for every warrior Putin kills, five more are born, and West has endless funds to train and arm them. And these Arabs/Muslims enjoy fighting, enjoy war: they are like Klingons: to die in battle is considered honorable and desirable, for Heaven awaits them in the After-Life.

    You can’t do it, Putin. You have no choice but to give up on Syria. Assad should step down and allow West to hold elections in Syria to establish a new government.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Erdo
    "Russia has no choice but to leave Syria."

    Assuming everything you wrote is correct, then what?

    What will follow if Putin takes his army out of Syria back to Russia?

    It is clear that the same warriors you mentioned will then move their fight inside Russia. Putin knows this so he obviously decided it's better to fight them in a far away country rather than in Russia. I think his rationale is very sound.

    USA will make a big mistake if they try to dislodge Russia out of Syria. Russians feel under existential threat and will fight rather than to back down.

    , @CalDre
    You mean Russia will be "stuck" in Syria like US is in Afghanistan? Perhaps. Assad's initial problem was the large number of defections which allowed ISIS/al Qaeda to seize large parts of Syria unopposed - much like ISIS seized large parts of Iraq unopposed. Once the rule of law has been restored, the borders will be tightened to prevent the steady terrorist and weapons infiltration and the terrorists won't be allowed to get such a strong foothold anymore. As we know, border control is key to having security.
    , @Jus' Sayin'...
    To me this reads like nickel-per-word Hasbara. The only ones that really benefit from Assad's overthrow are Israel, the Gulf States and Turkey. (Maybe the US elites/oligarchs if it opens the way for a Gulf-Europe pipeline.)
  6. Erdo says:
    @AshkeNietzsche
    Russia has no choice but to leave Syria.

    Something Putin must come to accept is this: let’s say that Putin succeeds in reclaiming all of Syria’s original land and eliminating all enemy forces in Syria. Then once Russia leaves after accomplishing this, West will again send hundreds of thousands of armed and trained Arab/Muslim warriors to wage war on Assad and start reclaiming the land piece by piece.

    So, what this means is that Russia would have to stay in Syria FOR EVER! Is Russia willing to do this? Does Russia want to handle the cost, resources, and lost Russian soldier lives associated with staying in Syria forever, constantly fighting wave after wave of Arab/Muslim warriors trying to break into Syria? Think about it, Putin: Arabs and Muslims have extremely high fertility: for every warrior Putin kills, five more are born, and West has endless funds to train and arm them. And these Arabs/Muslims enjoy fighting, enjoy war: they are like Klingons: to die in battle is considered honorable and desirable, for Heaven awaits them in the After-Life.

    You can’t do it, Putin. You have no choice but to give up on Syria. Assad should step down and allow West to hold elections in Syria to establish a new government.

    “Russia has no choice but to leave Syria.”

    Assuming everything you wrote is correct, then what?

    What will follow if Putin takes his army out of Syria back to Russia?

    It is clear that the same warriors you mentioned will then move their fight inside Russia. Putin knows this so he obviously decided it’s better to fight them in a far away country rather than in Russia. I think his rationale is very sound.

    USA will make a big mistake if they try to dislodge Russia out of Syria. Russians feel under existential threat and will fight rather than to back down.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    Russians feel under existential threat and will fight rather than to back down.
     
    I hope so

    but their enemy in DC (and London and Tel Aviv) is not rational. That's the tricky part, because if you tell them a war with Russia will end up slaughtering potentially untold millions upon millions of people, and destabilize and destroy country after country, and plunge huge swaths of the region into dire despair and misery... they'd respond by saying 'Ok, but what's the down side?'

    Watching Syrians and Russians and Turks and American GI's getting blown to bits is fun for them. So that is our collective challenge. Putin can't do this alone. He needs the voice of the American people as an amen corner. Like what we did when Obama tried to bomb Syria over the false flag "chemical weapons attack". But we, the American people called our congressmen (that was the first and only time I've ever actually picked up the phone and called my congresswomen) and said basically 'fuck no!' to bombing Syria.

    We need to muster that kind of resolve once again, and demand that we stay out of Syria.

    They're afraid that Trump might win, and with his America First mantra, we're going to begin coming home and stop terrorizing the world on behalf of our bestest little buddy.

    Before they allow that to happen, they might want to start a hot war with Russia. The world's hopes and prayers are that Vlad can manage to out-maneuver them, perhaps with China's and the world's diplomats behind closed doors, all working against the interests of the war/banking cartels and cabals and for the interests of peace and sanity.

    May sanity (and peace) prevail.
    , @AshkeNietzsche
    Putin will have to stay in Syria forever and find a way to pay for it. The only other option would be for him to bring Brown fertility down to zero. I don't believe he has the Chutzpah to do this.
  7. CalDre says:
    @AshkeNietzsche
    Russia has no choice but to leave Syria.

    Something Putin must come to accept is this: let’s say that Putin succeeds in reclaiming all of Syria’s original land and eliminating all enemy forces in Syria. Then once Russia leaves after accomplishing this, West will again send hundreds of thousands of armed and trained Arab/Muslim warriors to wage war on Assad and start reclaiming the land piece by piece.

    So, what this means is that Russia would have to stay in Syria FOR EVER! Is Russia willing to do this? Does Russia want to handle the cost, resources, and lost Russian soldier lives associated with staying in Syria forever, constantly fighting wave after wave of Arab/Muslim warriors trying to break into Syria? Think about it, Putin: Arabs and Muslims have extremely high fertility: for every warrior Putin kills, five more are born, and West has endless funds to train and arm them. And these Arabs/Muslims enjoy fighting, enjoy war: they are like Klingons: to die in battle is considered honorable and desirable, for Heaven awaits them in the After-Life.

    You can’t do it, Putin. You have no choice but to give up on Syria. Assad should step down and allow West to hold elections in Syria to establish a new government.

    You mean Russia will be “stuck” in Syria like US is in Afghanistan? Perhaps. Assad’s initial problem was the large number of defections which allowed ISIS/al Qaeda to seize large parts of Syria unopposed – much like ISIS seized large parts of Iraq unopposed. Once the rule of law has been restored, the borders will be tightened to prevent the steady terrorist and weapons infiltration and the terrorists won’t be allowed to get such a strong foothold anymore. As we know, border control is key to having security.

    Read More
  8. Ivan K. says:

    Clearly, Hillary is the candidate of the One Percent, and Trump is the candidate for the rest of us.
    Unfortunately, about half of the 99 percent is too dumb to know this.

    The attitude of that half is also a consequence of a certain historical inertia, on national level.
    Historian Benjamin Madley:

    In the year 1851, California’s first elected civilian governor, a man named Peter Burnett , declared that, and I quote:
    “A war of extermination will continue to be waged until the Indian race becomes extinct.”
    The very next year, Californian senator John Weller who later became a US Governor, told the US senators in Washington DC:
    “Californian Indians will be exterminated before the onward march of the white man.” (1)

    “State and federal policies,” Benjamin Madley writes, “in combination with vigilante violence, played major roles in the near-annihilation of California Indians during the first twenty-seven years of U.S. rule. . . . [reducing] California Indian numbers by at least 80 percent, from perhaps 150,000 to some 30,000. In less than three decades newcomers — with the support of both the state and federal governments — nearly exterminated California’s Indians.” (2)

    Medley: “It’s hard to wrap your head around the idea of the government carrying out such a policy, but it did. Not only did governors of California call out militia expeditions. State legislators passed three bills in the 1850s that raised up to one and a half million dollars to fund these operations [in the 1850s those were enormous money]. … And they raised these money after the fact, after reports of what the militia have done have come in. …. And if you think this is merely something going on in a rogue state, the United States Congress raised nearly a million dollars, also after the facts came in, also to pay for these operations.” (3)

    It’s simply difficult to get rid of this social pattern.

    (1) 06:20 (https://ia801508.us.archive.org/32/items/talknationradio_20160928/talknationradio_20160928.mp3)

    (2) (https://www.amazon.com/American-Genocide-California-Catastrophe-1846-1873/product-reviews/0300181361)

    (3) the link at (1) at 11:10

    Read More
  9. Rurik says:
    @jacques sheete
    You could have at least posted a warning about the link.

    While I'm not prone to nightmares, I think I may have some tonight after clicking that link, if I can sleep at all !

    Good grief, man! Have some respect for yer fellow commenters, eh? ;)

    mea culpa Jacques (and Kiza)

    my bad

    Read More
  10. Roberts:

    “Where in American politics do Washington’s European, British, Canadian, Australian, and Japanese vassals see leadership worthy of their sacrifice of sovereignty and independent foreign policy? Where do they even see a modicum of intelligence?

    “Why does the world look to the most stupid, vile, arrogant, corrupt and murderous government on the planet for leadership?”

    Well, uh . . . I don’t know.

    Read More
    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Rurik

    I don’t know.
     
    sure you do

    because the Zio-regime has the Fed, and can >>poof<<, create trillions of dollars of bribing lucre ~just like that~

    so if you're a corrupt politician like all the ones in Western Europe and Australia, etc.., then you do what they tell you to do, or you won't get that cushy job at that university or be a board member on a bank once you retire.

    when you're calculating the great karmic universe, and your place in it...

    what are a few hundred thousand murdered souls and millions of destroyed lives / compared to a cushy job as dean of some rotting university?!

    it's a no brainer
  11. Rurik says:
    @Erdo
    "Russia has no choice but to leave Syria."

    Assuming everything you wrote is correct, then what?

    What will follow if Putin takes his army out of Syria back to Russia?

    It is clear that the same warriors you mentioned will then move their fight inside Russia. Putin knows this so he obviously decided it's better to fight them in a far away country rather than in Russia. I think his rationale is very sound.

    USA will make a big mistake if they try to dislodge Russia out of Syria. Russians feel under existential threat and will fight rather than to back down.

    Russians feel under existential threat and will fight rather than to back down.

    I hope so

    but their enemy in DC (and London and Tel Aviv) is not rational. That’s the tricky part, because if you tell them a war with Russia will end up slaughtering potentially untold millions upon millions of people, and destabilize and destroy country after country, and plunge huge swaths of the region into dire despair and misery… they’d respond by saying ‘Ok, but what’s the down side?’

    Watching Syrians and Russians and Turks and American GI’s getting blown to bits is fun for them. So that is our collective challenge. Putin can’t do this alone. He needs the voice of the American people as an amen corner. Like what we did when Obama tried to bomb Syria over the false flag “chemical weapons attack”. But we, the American people called our congressmen (that was the first and only time I’ve ever actually picked up the phone and called my congresswomen) and said basically ‘fuck no!’ to bombing Syria.

    We need to muster that kind of resolve once again, and demand that we stay out of Syria.

    They’re afraid that Trump might win, and with his America First mantra, we’re going to begin coming home and stop terrorizing the world on behalf of our bestest little buddy.

    Before they allow that to happen, they might want to start a hot war with Russia. The world’s hopes and prayers are that Vlad can manage to out-maneuver them, perhaps with China’s and the world’s diplomats behind closed doors, all working against the interests of the war/banking cartels and cabals and for the interests of peace and sanity.

    May sanity (and peace) prevail.

    Read More
  12. @AshkeNietzsche
    Russia has no choice but to leave Syria.

    Something Putin must come to accept is this: let’s say that Putin succeeds in reclaiming all of Syria’s original land and eliminating all enemy forces in Syria. Then once Russia leaves after accomplishing this, West will again send hundreds of thousands of armed and trained Arab/Muslim warriors to wage war on Assad and start reclaiming the land piece by piece.

    So, what this means is that Russia would have to stay in Syria FOR EVER! Is Russia willing to do this? Does Russia want to handle the cost, resources, and lost Russian soldier lives associated with staying in Syria forever, constantly fighting wave after wave of Arab/Muslim warriors trying to break into Syria? Think about it, Putin: Arabs and Muslims have extremely high fertility: for every warrior Putin kills, five more are born, and West has endless funds to train and arm them. And these Arabs/Muslims enjoy fighting, enjoy war: they are like Klingons: to die in battle is considered honorable and desirable, for Heaven awaits them in the After-Life.

    You can’t do it, Putin. You have no choice but to give up on Syria. Assad should step down and allow West to hold elections in Syria to establish a new government.

    To me this reads like nickel-per-word Hasbara. The only ones that really benefit from Assad’s overthrow are Israel, the Gulf States and Turkey. (Maybe the US elites/oligarchs if it opens the way for a Gulf-Europe pipeline.)

    Read More
    • Replies: @AshkeNietzsche
    Yes, it benefits Israel, and I believe this is a good thing.

    Evolution dictates that the stronger replace the weaker. But, I do believe in altruism, so I support replacement with a touch of love. The Arabic people in the Middle East should, in a gentle and loving manner, be relocated to Europe and Australia. The much more advanced Israelis require a nation as big as the USA, so the entire Middle East has to be annexed.

    Plus, Caucasians love multiculturalism, so they will love their new Arabic neighbors.
  13. Rurik says:
    @Orville H. Larson
    Roberts:

    "Where in American politics do Washington's European, British, Canadian, Australian, and Japanese vassals see leadership worthy of their sacrifice of sovereignty and independent foreign policy? Where do they even see a modicum of intelligence?

    "Why does the world look to the most stupid, vile, arrogant, corrupt and murderous government on the planet for leadership?"

    Well, uh . . . I don't know.

    I don’t know.

    sure you do

    because the Zio-regime has the Fed, and can >>poof<<, create trillions of dollars of bribing lucre ~just like that~

    so if you're a corrupt politician like all the ones in Western Europe and Australia, etc.., then you do what they tell you to do, or you won't get that cushy job at that university or be a board member on a bank once you retire.

    when you're calculating the great karmic universe, and your place in it…

    what are a few hundred thousand murdered souls and millions of destroyed lives / compared to a cushy job as dean of some rotting university?!

    it's a no brainer

    Read More
  14. Realist says:

    “Clearly, Hillary is the candidate of the One Percent, and Trump is the candidate for the rest of us.

    Unfortunately, about half of the 99 percent is too dumb to know this.”

    Again, this is the main reason democracy has never worked for long and never will.

    Read More
  15. @Jus' Sayin'...
    To me this reads like nickel-per-word Hasbara. The only ones that really benefit from Assad's overthrow are Israel, the Gulf States and Turkey. (Maybe the US elites/oligarchs if it opens the way for a Gulf-Europe pipeline.)

    Yes, it benefits Israel, and I believe this is a good thing.

    Evolution dictates that the stronger replace the weaker. But, I do believe in altruism, so I support replacement with a touch of love. The Arabic people in the Middle East should, in a gentle and loving manner, be relocated to Europe and Australia. The much more advanced Israelis require a nation as big as the USA, so the entire Middle East has to be annexed.

    Plus, Caucasians love multiculturalism, so they will love their new Arabic neighbors.

    Read More
  16. @Erdo
    "Russia has no choice but to leave Syria."

    Assuming everything you wrote is correct, then what?

    What will follow if Putin takes his army out of Syria back to Russia?

    It is clear that the same warriors you mentioned will then move their fight inside Russia. Putin knows this so he obviously decided it's better to fight them in a far away country rather than in Russia. I think his rationale is very sound.

    USA will make a big mistake if they try to dislodge Russia out of Syria. Russians feel under existential threat and will fight rather than to back down.

    Putin will have to stay in Syria forever and find a way to pay for it. The only other option would be for him to bring Brown fertility down to zero. I don’t believe he has the Chutzpah to do this.

    Read More
  17. @Rurik

    Clearly, Hillary is the candidate of the One Percent, and Trump is the candidate for the rest of us.

    Unfortunately, about half of the 99 percent is too dumb to know this.
     
    I wouldn't simply put it down to dumb, although you can never go wrong betting on their collective stupidity

    but I think even more than stupidity there is the motivation of identity politics that bolsters the war sow's prospects. Blacks and Hispanics and a few women will be voting for her to get a bigger share of the entitlement pie. Not to mention knowing how much that shrill, cackling gorgon's voice is for the rest of us worse than ten thousand babies screaming with fingernails on black boards combined. They aren't voting for Hitlery as much as they're voting against the deplorables- the 'patriarchy' and all those 'white, male construction workers' that Robert Reich was shitting on. They don't like us very much, and these select specimens are certainly not stupid per se

    https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t31.0-8/p720x720/10603995_10153332503649384_6114905935391146369_o.jpg

    so if you ask the typical BLM or La Raza voter if he'd prefer Hillary and more wars and corruption and more of these castrating hounds on the court, vs. a Donald Trump appointee, then they're likely to prefer the ones pictured. Even knowing that they're screwing their prospects for any hope of an honest country and prosperous future. The EBT card holders and race pimps would side with the one percent in a calculated and cynical preference for even more wars and cronyism because they really do hate the deplorables that much.

    Politics makes strange bedfellows indeed

    Hey, Rurik!

    Now, when you say “They don’t like us very much…” are you referring to liberals in general, er what? Or are you referring to women who look like men?

    Speaking of ‘them’…I’m not sure if you’ve ever heard of a guy by the name of Noel Ignatiev; he was/is a Jewish professor at Harvard University. Although a white man himself (Ashkenazi Jews are not a different race), Ignatiev absolutely despises white people! Check out some of these quotes from Dr. Ignatiev…

    “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists…Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed.”

    “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign.”

    Here’s a good one…

    “If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world!”

    How is this POS still breathing?! This shows us that groups like the Klu Klux Klan, the Aryan Brotherhood, the Neo-Nazi’s, et. al., are nothing but a scam, a false front to serve the Jews in their plans to destroy America. David Duke, too…he’s been so discredited, shamed, and slandered in the MSM, that he’s now nothing but toxic waste! Every time the Jew’s want to smear something they roll out David Duke to promote it…which automatically taints that thing!

    Read More
    • Replies: @Rurik

    “They don’t like us very much…” are you referring to liberals in general, er what?
     
    Hey Anon Smith,

    I'm referring to all those people who consider us deplorable because we don't want Hillary Clinton as pres. If you want to talk about pure, raw hatred so perfect that it could split diamonds, that would probably come from John McCain. And he'd be the first person I'd like to see behind bars.

    And then you go down the rows and rows of others that hate the deplorables. Blacks, Zionists Jews, liberals and assorted butt-hurt minorities.

    Every time the Jew’s want to smear something they roll out David Duke to promote it…which automatically taints that thing!
     
    yes, I know

    Dr. Duke's persona is more of a cartoon caricature of the real man. A media construct, just like Vlad Putin or even Donald Trump. But they own the media, don't they? It was Woodrow Wilson who handed our destiny over to those people. And no one put a bullet in his head, so we live with the consequences and move on. Doing what we can. But the script was written long before any of us came on the scene.
  18. Rurik says:
    @Anonymous Smith
    Hey, Rurik!

    Now, when you say "They don’t like us very much..." are you referring to liberals in general, er what? Or are you referring to women who look like men?

    Speaking of 'them'...I'm not sure if you've ever heard of a guy by the name of Noel Ignatiev; he was/is a Jewish professor at Harvard University. Although a white man himself (Ashkenazi Jews are not a different race), Ignatiev absolutely despises white people! Check out some of these quotes from Dr. Ignatiev...

    "The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists...Keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed."

    "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign."

    Here's a good one...

    "If you are a white male, you don't deserve to live. You are a cancer, you're a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world!"

    How is this POS still breathing?! This shows us that groups like the Klu Klux Klan, the Aryan Brotherhood, the Neo-Nazi's, et. al., are nothing but a scam, a false front to serve the Jews in their plans to destroy America. David Duke, too...he's been so discredited, shamed, and slandered in the MSM, that he's now nothing but toxic waste! Every time the Jew's want to smear something they roll out David Duke to promote it...which automatically taints that thing!

    “They don’t like us very much…” are you referring to liberals in general, er what?

    Hey Anon Smith,

    I’m referring to all those people who consider us deplorable because we don’t want Hillary Clinton as pres. If you want to talk about pure, raw hatred so perfect that it could split diamonds, that would probably come from John McCain. And he’d be the first person I’d like to see behind bars.

    And then you go down the rows and rows of others that hate the deplorables. Blacks, Zionists Jews, liberals and assorted butt-hurt minorities.

    Every time the Jew’s want to smear something they roll out David Duke to promote it…which automatically taints that thing!

    yes, I know

    Dr. Duke’s persona is more of a cartoon caricature of the real man. A media construct, just like Vlad Putin or even Donald Trump. But they own the media, don’t they? It was Woodrow Wilson who handed our destiny over to those people. And no one put a bullet in his head, so we live with the consequences and move on. Doing what we can. But the script was written long before any of us came on the scene.

    Read More

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS