The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewPaul Craig Roberts Archive
Trump’s Opponents See Normal Americans as Deplorables
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I guess we have all noticed that the holier-than-thou groups who whined that Trump wasn’t going to accept the outcome of the election refuse to accept it themselves.

Because I was critical of the George W. Bush regime, the liberal-progressive-leftwing and homosexual/transgendered rights groups have me on their mailing lists.

And it is unbelievable. The entirety of “the other America” refuses to accept the people’s decision. They think that their concerns are more important than the concerns of the American people, who they regard as nothing but a collection of racist homophobic rednecks.

Unless they provoke him beyond reason, Trump is not going to bother any of these people.

Trump wants to bring middle class jobs back to Americans, including for all those paid to protest him.

In order to avoide nuclear war, Trump wants to restore normal relations between the major nuclear powers.

When there are no jobs for Americans that pay enough to support an independent existence, Trump doesn’t see the point of massive legal and illegal immigration.

This is only common sense.

Yet “the threatened people” see it as fascism.

Who are “the threatened people?” As always, the most powerful.

Tell me, what lobby is more powerful than the Israel Lobby? You can’t. But the Jewish Lobby, J Street, has sent me a hysterical email at 5:11pm on 14 November. Unless “we all come together and oppose Trump’s appointment of Breitbart editor Stephan Bannon as chief strategist and senior counselor” a “wave of hate will sweep across the land,” consuming “Jews, Muslims, African-Americans, LGBT peoople (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered), immigrants, Hispanics, women and other groups.”

Really now! So is Trump’s chief strategist, whatever position that is, going to attack the Jews and those with unusual sexual impulses with drones and cluster bombs, like the zionist neoconservatives who controlled the Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama regimes did to millions of slaughtered and displaced peoples in 7 countries, and like Israel does to Palestinians? Or is the former Breitbart editor going to round them all up and torture them in Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo like Bush and Obama did. And like Netanyahu does in Israel?

Or will Trump simply shoot them down in the streets like Netanyahu does to the Palestinian women and children.

How come J Street and the Oligarchy-funded fronts are only concerned with nonexistent threats and ignore all of the real threats?

According to J Street, the main concern is that Trump has appointed an “Alt-Right” person to advise him. Dangerous tensions between nuclear powers? A collapsing American middle class?
These concerns, if present, are in the peripheral vision of the “threatened people.”

ORDER IT NOW

According to the front group known as the Southern Poverty Law Center, Trump’s election by fly-over America has resulted in “over 250 reports of hate crimes around the country.” Is the Southern Poverty Law Center including the brutal beating of a white man by a gang of blacks? How many innocents has Trump slaughtered and put into concentration camps? How many countries has he invaded? The corrupt American media and oligarchic front groups have created “the new Hitler” before he is even inaugerated.

The Klingon Clintons and neoconed Bush/Cheney and Obama killing regimes have murdered more people and invaded more countries than Hitler, and the holier-than-thou group doesn’t care. Yet, the all-powerful Israeli Lobby thinks a Breibart editor is going to target the Jews, immigrants, the transgendered and homosexuals, women, Muslims, Hispanics, “and other groups.” What a change this will be. Only non-immigrant, white, heterosexual males will be in the protected group known as the “preferred minority.”

We must hope that Donald Trump understands the state of moral, cultural, legal, and political collapse that America is in. Two years ago at the Valdai International Discussion Club, Russian President Vladimir Putin said:

“Many of the Euro-Atlantic countries are actually rejecting their roots, including the Christian values that constitute the basis of Western civilization. They are denying moral principles and all traditional identities, national, cultural, religious, and even secular. They are implementing policies that equate families with same-sex partnerships, worship of God with worship of Satan. I am convinced that this opens a direct path to degradation and primitivism, resulting in a profound demographic and moral crisis.”

Ordinary Americans know what he means. They are forced to accept blasphemous films about Jesus Christ and shameless newspaper caricatures of the Virgin Mary, but if one of them calls a homosexual a pervert, he has committed a hate crime.

America is a country without an honest media. A country without an honest judiciary. Without an honest government. Without an honest legislature. Without honest schools and universities. A country whose morals are confused by propaganda. A country whose elites believe that they are entitled to all the income and wealth and that normal American people are the “deplorables,” to use Hillary’s term for ordinary Americans.

(Republished from PaulCraigRoberts.org by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2016 Election, Donald Trump 
Hide 23 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    One thing for sure, Trump would not be president if he had said in the tape, “I wanna shove my fist up her ass” than “Grab her by the pu**y.”

  2. Diogenes says:

    The “ALT-RIGHT” movement is a violent reaction to the excesses of LIBERALISM. It places a favorable emphasis on ultra-nationalism, white supremacism, Islamophobia, antifeminism, homophobia, antisemitism, ethno-nationalism, right-wing populism, nativism, traditionalism and reactionism.

    In essence it stands in opposition to the values of Liberal ideology which has been the the paradigm of free enterprise democratic capitalism in the modern age.
    The election of Trump is the culmination of the failure of the Liberal political classes to practice the values of Liberalism in an inclusive way.

    Chris Hedges in Death of the Liberal Class [2010] argues that:
    … “the failure of the liberal class to confront the rise of the corporate state and the consequences of a liberalism that has become profoundly bankrupted.”

    “…the five pillars of the liberal establishment – the press, liberal religious institutions, labor unions, universities and the Democratic Party– and that each of these institutions, more concerned with status and privilege than justice and progress, sold out the constituents they represented. In doing so, the liberal class has become irrelevant to society at large and ultimately the corporate power elite they once served.”

    “The liberal class plays a vital role in a democracy. It gives moral legitimacy to the state. It makes limited forms of dissent and incremental change possible. The liberal class posits itself as the conscience of the nation. It permits us, through its appeal to public virtues and the public good, to define ourselves as a good and noble people. Most importantly, on behalf of the power elite the liberal class serves as bulwarks against radical movements by offering a safety valve for popular frustrations and discontentment by discrediting those who talk of profound structural change. Once this class loses its social and political role then the delicate fabric of a democracy breaks down and the liberal class, along with the values it espouses, becomes an object of ridicule and hatred.”

    There you have it, Hedges predicted the rise of the Alt Right and Trump six years ago, which he called “Proto- Fascists”, because of the failure of the liberal class to do what it was suppose to do; instead it became corrupted my money and power and today we can see what this failure has wrought. It’s not going to be pretty to watch the decline of “liberal democracy” in America!

  3. @Diogenes

    Yes. The Alt-Right movement is a reaction to the excesses of liberalism. The rest of your first paragraph is nonsense.

    Chris Hedges is correct regarding the death of the liberal class.

    “It’s not going to be pretty to watch the decline of “liberal democracy” in America!”

    Should read: It has not be pretty to watch. It’s over. Liberal democracy in America is history.

  4. Well said Mr. Roberts. I have come to view Trump’s opponents as my personal enemies. They threaten my life. Politics in America have devolved and are devolving into a blood sport. It has become vitally important to know who are your friends and who are your enemies.

  5. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Diogenes

    —-Chris Hedges in Death of the Liberal Class [2010] argues that:
    … “the failure of the liberal class to confront the rise of the corporate state and the consequences of a liberalism that has become profoundly bankrupted.”—-

    But Hedges is also in denial. Many of his critique of late capitalism is spot on, and I agree with his denunciation of what he calls the empire of illusion. We are living in some kind of perverted mickey mouse fantasy land where reality meets fantasy.

    But Hedges is also living in a kind of fantasy, one built on PC. He won’t challenge the real shibboleths of American Power, namely that there is an ethnic component to this problem. Jews aren’t merely rich people acting like ‘rich a-holes’. They are rich people using their power for tribal interests. Now, Jews acting tribally is fine as long as whites are allowed to act tribally too. But Jews defend their interests and identity but excoriate whites for expressing any identity or interest. Worse, Jews keep fanning anti-white flames among non-whites.

    Also, Hedges is too wedded to radical cliches to realize that they are just as idiotic as Pop Culture fantasies. Good for him to tear apart something like 50 SHADES OF GREY, a vapid celebration of wealth, power, and obsession with privilege. But what was his healthy alternative for a better future?

    Yep, you guessed it:

    Read the whole thing here: https://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pornography_is_what_the_end_of_the_world_looks_like_20150215

    Hedges is so deeply into radical PC that he is clueless that he essentially trolled himself. I mean what worse sexual torture can one think of than Andrea Dworkin?
    50 Shades of Grey is Mister Rogers compared to Andrea the Giant.

    Hedges is right that the Democratic Party now serves the globo-capitalist elite.
    He is right that our pop culture is about excessive narcissism, hedonism, escapism, trashism, infantilism, and etc.
    But he won’t attack homomania that is the center of this idiocy. He won’t admit that the elites pushed homomania as the new ‘progressivism’ to turn the Left into a joke, more a fashion show and faddish cult than a serious movement about basic problems facing most middle class and working class folks.
    Now, I can understand Progressives championing tolerance for homos and allowing homo individuals to pursue careers. If a homo is a fine accountant or engineer, why not let him do his job?
    BUT, homosexuality can never be of EQUAL value with real sex, and notions such as ‘marriage equality’ opens the pandora’s box to all sorts of inanities and insanities.
    I mean if homo fecal penetration is basis for marriage, then just about any freak can make any demands on the name of equality.
    After ‘gay marriage’, there is no moral defense against polygamy or ‘incest marriage’. Such aren’t yet laws of the land, but if we follow the logic of ‘marriage equality’, anything goes. If homos should ‘marry’ on the basis of their idea of ‘love’, then why not mother and son or father and daughter and homo father and homo son?
    Also, if homosexuality is just as good as real sexuality and if trans-sexualism is also great cuz of its alliance with homos, then so are 50 or 100 other ‘genders’. Doesn’t Hedge see how homomania is related to the Empire of Illusion? We now have ‘progressives’ in colleges bitching and whining endlessly about how having green hair and tattoo on their ass makes them a ‘ze’ than a ‘he’ or ‘she’.
    In a real and normal world, we should acknowledge some people are born homo and accept them as such. But we should not turn praise of homos into some kind of pomo-homo-religion.

    Also, Leftism used to be about hard men and women facing hard times and having the guts to take on hard tasks for a better future. Grapes of Wrath is not about Fruits(homos) of Frivolity.
    But once proggism was taught to EVERY kid in America, even coddled privileged upper middle class and elite kids grew up with precious ‘victim’ mentality. Even though they had easy lives and all the privilege, they grew up wanting to be ‘victims’. So, every snowflake in college doesn’t want to be ‘triggered’ by uh.. ‘micro-aggressions’.
    Leftism used to be about workers with rough hands from real work in factory or on the farm. Now, it’s about fragile emotions and chipped fingernails of spoiled brats and pampered twits like Emma Sulkowicz, Lena Dunham, fat blowhard on Young Turk, Black Lives Matter lesbians(who have no understanding of reality), and men in dress who wanna wee wee in women’s room.

    But Hedges won’t touch on any of this.

    Also, Hedges overly idealizes the People. Yes, many people are suffering from White Death and Black Decay and all sorts of decadence, but a lot of people brought it upon themselves with excessive hedonism, narcissism, individualism, and infantilism. Granted, the elites made it worse by feeding garbage to the people via TV and movies and music, but there is moral corruption at every level of society.
    During the Great Depression, times were much tougher with far fewer safety nets, but people were stronger and had moral fiber. But look all around, and the problem of a lot of people is excess, not lack. Even among the poor, their main obsessions are hair weaves. It’s like that black woman in Milwaukee saying it’s better to burn stores in suburbs cuz they need their hair weaves. I mean WTF.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EFNLZ6Ug04

    Trump is right that the working class did get the shaft. But watch the documentary COUNTRY BOYS, and there is something really wrong with white working class and underclass. They are lazy, unmotivated, and have a millions excuses for messing up.
    They’d rather get ass tattoos than some learning.
    Americans were far less educated in the 19th century, but country boys back then walked miles to get to school to learn the basics. Now, a lot of students don’t even bother to learn when school buses pick them up.
    Where the elites have failed is in their refusal to lead. But then, in Jewish-controlled America, the notion of white elites caring about and leading white masses is just a no-no. Sounds too much like National Socialism.

    Hedges, like Gore Vidal, is a much better critic of the rich and privileged than an expert of the American People. Vidal wasn’t born rich but he had rich connections, and he knew the ins-and-outs of how the elites thought and operated. He has no illusions about how devious and nasty they could be. But he knew nothing about the people. They were a mere abstraction for him, and he was pro-people in ideology without having any knowledge of them realistically. Also, being pro-people was an easy way for him to gain advantage credits since he wasn’t born with lots of money like others in the rich class. It’s like the Tom character in METROPOLITAN. He is born into elite class culturally but lacks the means financially. So, his crutch is ‘socialism’.

    I think Hedges is the same way. He attended elite schools with kids with far more money and connections. He watched them with envy and resentment. He knows their world, and he finds people like George W. Bush just awful: entitled, spoiled, and shallow. So far so good. But he has no real understanding of people since his formative experiences were with the rich. Later in life, surely he went to poor towns and troubled nations and reported on problems. But he always saw that reality through the formative prism of ‘corrupt elite vs everyone else’, and his sense of ennoblement is premised on self-image as champion of the suffering oppressed masses.

    But real folks like us, who’ve had contact with the underclass all our lives, have no illusions about the People. They are as corrupt, if not more so, than the elites. It’s just that they don’t have the power or means to rob tons via Wall Street or cook up BS to invade other nations.

    Now, religions are useful in this sense. The concept of sin says moral corruption is in all our hearts. Sure, the rich and powerful can exploit religion as ‘opiate for the masses’, but if used properly, religions or moral philosophy can be a sobering medicine for the people. Unlike leftist ideology that says, “bring down the evil elites, and we will have kingdom of heaven on earth”, religions teach that Sin is in the hearts of each and every person. Each of us, rich or poor, have the seven deadly sins that make us eat too much, covet too much, get ass tattoos, refer to women as ‘cu*buckets’, or stare into the mirror all day with fake eyelashes and lipsticks. We are our own worst enemies. Look at rappers in ghetto. They be yapping about how the white man got all the goodies, but whenever some rappers makes some money, all he cares about gold bling, lotsa ho’s, mansions and swimming pools, vanity, and materialism like Tony Montana of Scarface.

    When Jesus was tempted by Satan, He owned nothing. Yet, He felt the temptation of wealth and power even in His poverty-stricken state. In other words, rich or poor, our hearts are tempted by same sins. NO wonder that whenever a revolution heralds a new era, the new boss is hardly better than the old boss. So, it’s not just about good poor folks vs bad rich folks. It is about moral corruption in the heart of anyone.

    The problem with Hedgian ideology is ALL THE BLAME is placed on elites and capitalist. Yes, they do a lot of bad things.
    But the people must learn to realize that their own hearts are tempted by rot, evil, and wickedness. Getting an ass tattoo may not blow up the world, but it is trashy. It is an act of perversity, narcissism(of the most twisted kind as what is beautiful about a picture of a skull on one’s ass?), stupidity, infantility.

    So, if poor folks don’t wanted to be exploited and manipulated by scum suckers like Jerry Springer and Hollywood and others, they need to wake up and grow up and etc.

    But Hedges just sees the people as victims without agency. And the ONLY kind of agency he believes in is the politics of demento rage that does no good. He supports nonsense movements like BLM that is founded on lies.
    In fact, Blacks are dying because too many blacks are nuts with guns. Black problem is that too many blacks holler ‘Black Lives Matter’ from one side of the mouth while hollering ‘Die Ni**a Die’ from the other side of the mouth as they blaze away with their guns in crazy gang wars.

    “The “ALT-RIGHT” movement is a violent reaction to the excesses of LIBERALISM. It places a favorable emphasis on ultra-nationalism, white supremacism, Islamophobia, antifeminism, homophobia, antisemitism, ethno-nationalism, right-wing populism, nativism, traditionalism and reactionism.”

    I don’t think you are understanding the real appeal of Alt Right. True, Alt Right has certain ideological leanings. But its real appeal is lack of PC and lack of dog-whistling.

    Outside Alt Right, it’s all PC or dog-whistling.

    Gentrification, we know, is really about pushing blacks out of cities.
    We know about the Wall Around Hyde Park. It’s all about race — blacks are stronger and more aggressive, therefore more thuggish — , but Libs pretend otherwise.

    http://uchicagogate.com/2014/06/02/a-wall-around-hyde-park/

    When Jews denounce ‘white supremacism’, they really mean white identity is obstacle to whites supporting Jewish Supremacism.
    We know ‘rape culture’ is all about driving a wedge between unity of white men and white women. After all, top rapists are blacks, not white men, but ‘rape culture’ hysteria is always about white males raping women. Rape culture freaks out about Haven Monahans like BIRTH OF A NATION freaked out about black rapists(who were more likely).
    Neocons, Libs, traditional Conservatives, Christian Libs and Cons, Mormons, the Left, the Far Left, blacks, and etc. are all full of PC, hypocrisy, and dog-whistling. Regardless of their position, they are not capable of carrying out a HONEST conversation about identity and interests. The so-called ‘Left’ and non-whites resort to same old same old KKKrazy Glue and pretend whites or white males are responsible for all problems.
    And Cons and Libertarians pretend ‘liberty’ and ‘constitution’ are panacea for everything.
    Behind all such talk are issues of race and ethnic interests. But they pretend otherwise.

    But Alt Right is willing to speak honestly and put everything on the table. It doesn’t dogwhistle about race or Jews because it wants an honest debate.

    This is where Alt Right is different from Trump. When Trump says ‘globalists’, he could be meaning ‘Jewish elites’… but then, Stephen Miller his speechwriter is Jewish, so maybe not. Or, maybe Miller is paradoxically trying to appropriate ‘antisemitism’ to make it pro-semitic. Have Trump talk like a dog-whistling ‘antisemite’ while supporting Israel and bashing Muslims. Thus, talk of ‘globalism’ goes from hostility toward Jews to support of Jews.

    But Alt Right is different cuz it talks about race and ethnicity and different interests.
    And it scoffs at all taboos on the matter.

    By the way, I don’t think Alt Right had much to do with Trump’s success. Most Trump voters never heard of Spencer or Alt Right. They were voting on the basis of “it’s the economy, stupid”. Also, they are not asking for pro-white policies that favor whites over others. They are just asking for policies that aren’t anti-white and esp not anti-white-working-class.

    Alt Right votes for Trump was what? Maybe 5% if that. I think less. Alt Right got a boost because the media wanted to smear Trump via association, but it only made Alt Right look funny and trollish cuz they played with frog memes.

    • Replies: @hbm
    , @Anonymous
  6. Anon • Disclaimer says:
    @Diogenes

    —–The “ALT-RIGHT” movement is a violent reaction to the excesses of LIBERALISM.—–

    I think the Dems made a big mistake in going with Obama in this sense.

    While Obama was no hardcore lefty socialist, he had ties with people like Bill Ayers and Wright. He also appointed a woman who claimed to admire Mao(though she was dropped from the nomination).

    For American Politics to work, the Center-Right must reject the far right, and the Center-Left must reject the far left. Center-Right must favor Center-Left over the far right, and the Center-Left must favor Center-Right over the far left.

    And I think ‘anti-nazi’ conservatives and ‘anti-communist’ liberals got along during the Cold War.

    But Obama’s ties to loathsome Wright was too close. And what was he doing with Ayers, a total shi*head?

    When the media and Libs said that doesn’t matter, they lost their moral justification to attack the Right of shmoozing up to the ‘far right’.

    If it was a-okay for Obama to pal around Ayers and Wright, then it’s okay for Trump to pal around ‘alt right’ types, even though, to be sure, Trump has no direct connection to any ‘far right’ figure. Unlike Obama who really was close to Wright and palled around with Ayers, Trump never golfed with David Duke. Not even with Pat Buchanan.
    But because Alt Right supported Trump and because Bannon has loose ties with Alt Right, people are freaking out over Trump’s ties to extremism.

    But it’s too late for the media and progs to bitch. They said they didn’t pursue the Wright-Ayers thing cuz it had ‘no traction’. Well, it had no traction because PC and media normalized radicalism on the left and vilified extremism only on the right.

    Chicken’s coming home to roost. Lib media shrugged off the problems of Obama’s associations and, if anything, worked with PC to suppress free speech and real debate.
    So, it is disingenuous for them to freak out about Trump’s extreme associations and authoritarian ways(when PC has been the main driver of shutting down honest discussion). But in fact, Trump has no direct connection to any extremist organization… except for AIPAC, the vehicle for Zionist supremacism over Palestinians.

    Another thing. The media look foolish mocking what they see as Trump’s cult of personality, but they paved the way with their celebrity mania over Obama.
    Media didn’t cover Obama. They anointed him as The One, the messiah, the messenger of ‘hope and change’. Evan Thomas said he is ‘sort of god’.

    http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2009/06/05/newsweeks-evan-thomas-obama-sort-god

    And when Obama won the presidency, the gushing drivel from the media was comparable to North Korean adulation of the Great Leader.

    https://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/new-time-editor-nancy-gibbs-has-lengthy-record-liberal-goo

    “Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope….Barack Hussein Obama did not win because of the color of his skin. Nor did he win in spite of it. He won because at a very dangerous moment in the life of a still young country, more people than have ever spoken before came together to try to save it. And that was a victory all its own.”

    — Time’s Nancy Gibbs in the November 17, 2008 cover story.

    When American politics turns into such mindless celebrity mania and fawning adoration of The Leader, is it any surprise that Trump took it the next step as the ‘god emperor’?

    But Trump is refreshing because his cult is a kind of stunt, circus, and joke.

    It’s not earnest and naive like the gushing worship of Prince Obama.

    The Cult of Trump comes in with a built-in cynicism of the media, the celebrity enterprise, and of Trump himself.

    • Replies: @KenH
  7. anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    It’s unfortunate but apparently very few Americans care anything about the lives of others around the world. The governments of the past three presidents, which included the recent failed presidential candidate as a primary actor as Secretary of State, have caused hundreds of thousands of people to die and millions to become refugees. Yet one rarely hears anything about that. Other people, non-Americans, are like ants who are of no interest whatsoever. What’s of importance to many of these Clintonistas is their little sex parades and endless squabbling about micro-aggressions and who uses what bathroom. If there’s any conflict the proles will go to do the fighting on their behalf so no need to worry.
    Mr Roberts is one of the very few public figures who has expressed any concern about the policies that have killed, maimed and immiserated millions of people around the world and my hat is off to him.

  8. Marcus says:

    I hope you’re right, but Trump’s belligerence to Iran bothers me. The Jewish hysteria is remarkable: he’s probably the most overtly pro-Jewish and pro-Israel president ever.

  9. David says:

    Does anyone know a person more likely to exude a holier-than-thou attitude than the “truth-teller” PCR, the man “at the top of the Washington hierarchy for a quarter century,” the once-member of “a secret committee that allowed Reagan to end the Cold War?”

    And does anyone know an American man more likely to crap on the generality of the “stupid” American public or more likely to sell out his people for a little Mexican acclamation?

    PCR is not the first to observe that the sublunary sphere is corrupt, he’s just the queeniest. He’s an embarrassment even when he’s right.

    • Replies: @Fran Macadam
    , @Ironfist666
  10. Ivan K. says:

    – The Klingon Clintons

    I’d say Cylon Clintons.

    – Bannon … Putin…

    Bannon on Putin:

    You know, Putin’s been quite an interesting character. He’s also very, very, very intelligent. I can see this in the United States where he’s playing very strongly to social conservatives about his message about more traditional values, so I think it’s something that we have to be very much on guard of. Because at the end of the day, I think that Putin and his cronies are really a kleptocracy, that are really an imperialist power that want to expand.
    https://www.buzzfeed.com/lesterfeder/this-is-how-steve-bannon-sees-the-entire-world

    Thankfully, there is hope in that in politics the players often end up with attitudes very different from their initial ones.

  11. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    That would have made him an “America Fister.”

  12. @David

    This is pretty “Queenie” on its own.

  13. hbm says:
    @Anon

    >When Jews denounce ‘white supremacism’, they really mean white identity is obstacle to whites supporting Jewish Supremacism.

    That’s exactly right. This election was and is about Jewish hegemony and globalization versus the remaining deplorable goyim not thrilled by the prospect of their disposession, displacement and ultimate genetic erasure, which the Elites assure us is the same thing as “hate.”

    The Left, the Democrats, the Marxists– whatever you want to call that fine bunch, have gone all-in on a post-White majority America. The Democratic National Convention was an orgy of anti-White hate and a celebration of our passing. That was their platform; load-up on minorities, women and Muslims and shout bigot and racist and “hate” at those who weren’t as thrilled as they were by the prospect of our nation ruled by those not of European descent, but lorded over by a predatory and genocidal Jewish elite with well-paid and well-brainwashed goyishe inner party members doing their bidding, all of them hiding behind the same tired stalking horse of Utopian promises of human perfectibility which always just happens to produce a mountain of goy corpses.

    I agree with Justin Raimando: Alt-Right is a nexus and basically means anti-Neocon. He wouldn’t say it, but it is inherently “anti-Semitic.” It has to be.

  14. @Anon

    Am I to surmise that you think anal fisting is normal?

  15. In many Democrat segments, yes, anal fisting is normal and customary.

  16. @Diogenes

    Richard Spencer coined the phrase Alt-Right in 2008 and started his own web site in 2010. Spencer was recently kicked off of Twitter. The best Alt Right web sites are Daily Stormer and Info Stormer. I stay away from Jared Taylor’s site, too many idiots posting moronic comments.

  17. @David

    Reagan never ended the cold war, he just sped up the inevitable. The U.S.S.R. had over stated their GDP for decades. Coupled with their unproductive economy and unorganized political system, the Soviet days were numbered. I would take PCR at his word before any of these pseudo insiders claiming non-sense for personal gain. PCR knows where the bodies are buried.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  18. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Usually I can’t bring myself to read such long comments but this one was different. A rant it is, but an inspired rant. I don’t know whether you drank a lot of coffee or wine, but you were writing from an altered state of mind.

    Well done. You hit many nails squarely on the head, perhaps the most important being: “But Alt Right is willing to speak honestly and put everything on the table.” and “it scoffs at all taboos on the matter”.

    And of course, the reason scoffing at taboos is taboo is because the other side has no real, tangible arguments–backed up by specific allegations which can be empirically tested–to put on the table.

    Reading the reactions of Hillary supporters to Trump’s election, one can’t help but notice that their denunciations of him are general ad hominems which, while putting their personal disappointment on display, don’t bother to cite any specific statement or quote of his to back up their claims of his misogyny, anti semitism, anti Muslim and/or racial animus towards blacks.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  19. MarkinLA says:
    @Ironfist666

    Actually, the Cold War ended because a blunder by Reagan that put the USSR on high alert and had them considering a first strike scared the hell out of Margaret Thatcher and she convinced Reagan that it was time to negotiate with Gorbachev.

    The Great Dufus wanted to attend a massive NATO exercise from the flagship. Since the nuclear football went everywhere he does, the Russians thought this was a ruse for a first strike and considered their own. They eventually realized that Reagan was just a moron but word of those discussions got back to Thatcher through spies. She realized how things could easily spin out of control and convinced Reagan to talk to Gorbachev.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/10/world/europe/nato-war-games-unwittingly-put-soviets-and-us-on-hair-trigger-in-83-analysis-suggests.html?_r=1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Archer_83

  20. anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Replying to your own posts again, eh, Priss?

  21. KenH says:
    @Anon

    For American Politics to work, the Center-Right must reject the far right, and the Center-Left must reject the far left. Center-Right must favor Center-Left over the far right, and the Center-Left must favor Center-Right over the far left.

    Sorry, but that ship has sailed and we’re now entering an America era of racialized politics and it’s an open question whether whites have what it takes to reject anti-racism and “race doesn’t matterism” and embrace racial nationalism like every other group. The Democrats have been taken over by the ultra left radicals and black and brown race chauvinists, so who or what will force the Dems to suddenly become milquetoast center lefties who work on behalf of all including the hated white deplorables?

    Black Muslim Keith Ellison, with ties to the not so center-left Nation of Islam and other Islamic groups, is poised to become the next DNC chair. Centrists and center-lefties are no longer in vogue and never will be again with the demographic changes sweeping the nation. After all that’s pretty much a white thing anyway.

  22. The US has been runned now for quite some times by Zionists (Jews and Christians waiting for the apocalypse). Among them, some are the heirs of the British empire, they want to reign over the whole World. Everywhere, if the can’t buy the local elite, they are destroying every thing turning the old system into chaos. To justify their action, they are trying to impose their new religion: the holocaust, the gender theory, the homosexuality etc..They are just slaves drivers. Others more fanatics are preparing the return of the Messiah in Israel and they are ready to kill all the goyim, like the Jihadists.
    The new elected US president is the result of the reject of Zionism by the common people in the US, but I am fearing that they will be disapointed by Trump, for he is very close to the Zionists. The difference with these zionists is; He enjoys life, he does not hate people and he does not want to blow up the world with a nuclear war. But between the gangsters and the crazies fanatics Zionists, he will have a tough time and will even risk his life if he wants to clean the house. I think that the US and theirs European domnions are a mad house and you cannot expect a soft landing in getting out of this madness.

  23. Ivan K. says: • Website

    Paul Craig Roberts hasn’t appeared with anything new on the net in five days. Even more strikingly, he hasn’t posted a new article in the past seven days. In the prior weeks, the interval between his new articles has been one to three days.
    There is a possibility that he could be seriously unwell – and keeps that fact very private.
    Another possibility is that Trump Team has called him for collaboration.
    Given the timing, the latter looks likelier.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Paul Craig Roberts Comments via RSS